Planning Commission - 03/22/1976 A, G E N D A -
Eden Prairie Planning Commission - -
Monday, March 22, 1976
7:30 PM City Hall
3stinated Invocation --- Pledge of Allegiance --- troll Call
time
7:30 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA.
7:35 II. MINUTES.
A. Minutes of the Joint Council/Planning -Commission Meeting February 23, 1976.
B. Minutes of the Planning Commission Fleeting February 23, 1976.
C. Minutes of the Joint Council/Planning Commission March 15, 1976.
7:45 III. MEMBERS RE-PORTS.
A. Chairman [ion Sorensen.
B. Council Representative Pauly.
C. Others
IV. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATICNS.
8:00 A. Minnesota Protective Life Insurance, request for PUD Concept and Developawmt
Stage approvals and rezoning frm Rural to Office District . The 5.42 acre
site is located north of Leona Road and east of TH i69 in the MCA.
8:30 B. Guide Plan Update, discussion of proposed contract with Brauer 8 Associates.
9:15 C. Park Dedication and Cash in Lieu of Land Policies.
9:40 D. Condon/Nae eg le Auto Dealerships, discussion of items for consideration in
the rezoning agreement. Discussion of Council requests avid staff report
dealing with the site plan.
10: 15 E: How rt Development Company Sign Policy, discussion of March 1 letter frns
Homart.
V. PETITI CNS AND REQUESTS. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
10:30 A. Mitchell lake PUD, revised platting and rezoning for single fancily and
multiple . The PUD is located east of Mitchell Lake and West of Co. Rd. 4 .
11 :00 B. CPrnes/Tangen platting, request to preliminary plat 6 lots and 3 outlots.
The site is located north of Willow Creek Addition and east of Bryant Lake. - - -
11:15 C. Prairie East 2nd Re21at*ing, request by Hustad Development Corporation
or preliminary plat approval on replatting the 64 lots of Prairie East
2nd into 60 lots. The plat is located between Franlo Road and Co. Rd. its.
11 :30 D. Identification Sign for the South CaMs, Hennepin Coanty Technical Ceuter.
11 :45 VI . NEW BUSINESS.
ll :Sd VIt. PLANNERS REPORT. _
12:00 -VI I I. ADJ Cl) MIENi.
• Estimated times are provided as a guideline for consideration of
agenda items.
'•'�--���':�+ � -• . -:.. . ... "` ., _ _ . .. ram.:�* •
-.■ii•__•r�i •• rE.a. II . ■ , . . ''iIW6&4QW Wit W u►1 :44W' w
...��I•—■ ■ YrW� „p jil•ri •n W Ww !~rm. ►' Ml r•,li1tl u .Y it u W iLICI
. �•i J l r 1 1. S
F.DIA PRAIRIE
.approved
t-nday, March 22, 1976 7 : 30 PM City Hall
M-MBERS PRESENT: Chairman Don Sorensen Norma Schee William Beaman , Rod Sundstrom,
Richard Lynch, Sidney Pauly, & Herb Fosnocht
MEMBERS ABSENIT: none
STAFF PRES£:'I:;: D.zk Putnam, Jean Johnson, Marty Jessen
I . APPROlAL OF AGENDA.
The commission approved the agenda as submitted.
I1. MINLITES.
A. Minutes of the Joint Council/Planning Connni ssinn Meeting February 23, 1976.
P. 1, Sth P, should read- and the Planning Commission ;s not given reasons
for the action and is left without concrete policies .
Lynch moved, Fosnocht seconded, to 4rprove the minutes as written and corrected.
The motion carried 5 :0 :2 with Pauly and Bearnan abstaining.
B. Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting February 23 , 1976.
P. 4 , Amendment #2 should read- to Rural and to repeal'
epeal the approval .
Schee moved, Lynch seconded, to approve the minutes as written and corrected.
The motion carried 5 :0 :2 with Pauly and Bearmin abstaining.
C. Minutes of the Joint Council/Planning Commission March 15 , 1976.
P. 1 last P, spelling of spoke.
3earman moved, Fosnocht seconded, to approve the minutes as written and corrected.
The *notion carried 6 :C : 1 with Lynch abstaining.
II f_- IBERS RI-PORTS. moved to end of agenda
M RL_`.P O TS k D RE_COi•ILVIENDAT I ONS.
A. ,I�r.nt�sc�ta i'rotective Life Insurance, request for PUD Concept and Development
Stage :pproval and rezoning from Rural to Office District. The S. 42 acre
site is located north of Leona Ro..d and cast of TH 169 in the 1►ILA.
The planner referred the commission to the engineer' s and pIanner' s reports.
He stated '_he project meets the intents and specifics of the MCA and the
planning staff i.ould reco,mend approval of the concept and re-oning.
Mr. Don Iiustad, i;ustad-Pont inen Architects, said they will comply with the staff report .
Mr. Koehler, 11518 Leona Road, stated be is not opposed to !LVGIopment and
appreciates the information supplied by the proporents, but he is concerned about
the impact of the building on his family' s privacy. He then asked questions
related to how additional parking would be handled, location of walkways and
t widening of Leona Road.
z The planner responded that the MPI. has purchased the single family lot directly
adjacent to their site and the present ImPI. site of approximately 6 acres should
r t-o- -iicient to handle present 4nd additional land woulu have to be acquired for
future parking expansion needs. The planner than explained how Leona road might be
widened and possible locations for walkunys.
Mr. Fosnocht questioned if the church would agree to public use of the .
sidewalk pasting the main extrance to the sanctuary.
Lynch expressed concern that Leona Road may not be able to handle the 700-1 ,000
trips/day that are projected fo: the project.
app 1*0 V�•�l
" ' . i' 111E CC11!iln] : SJ (1i; �� IlijYi -�_ March .12 , 11176
'f he planner felt the State lli,;hl:ay ncpartmcnt would sign::l the intersection of
Leona Road ar...1 # 169 if it is -..arranted nad did not believe the city or developer
would install a light at their cost .
Mr. Fosnocht suggested one-way glass may help provide pri%,acy fui Lhe 1 CSi-juiL Ial
area.
Lynch asked what type of fencing mould be placed along the single family uses .
Mr. Hustad responded that a board fwnce with plantings could be used.,but they
Will go along with the neighbors suggestions within reason.
Mr. Sundstroin suggested window treatment on the east $ide of the building ray be
a solution to screening views onto the single family.
Mr. Koehler asked if other situations of office/commercial buildings so close
to single family exists in Eden Prairie.
The planner cited other situations as -Fden Road and Franlo Rbad.
Mr. Sergan, Bentwood Drive, stated one-way glass only works from the direction
the light comes fro(,1, therefore if a light inside a single family home was on
people on the outside could see into the home. '
Sidney Pauly suggested some type of temporary architectural window treatment
be exn1ored.
Mr . Hustad said they would explore methods of architectural treatment foi the
windows but they would not like such a condition tied to the rezoning agreement .
Motion 1
Fosnocht moved , Schee seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of
the P')D Concept flan for the ;Minnesota Protective Life Insurance Company Office
and commercial development as outlined in A in the 3-4- 76 staff report with
first ph:isc Jcve.op;nenr of 73,000 square feet of G. F. A. , with 2nd phase expansion
requiring purchase of additional acreage for a multi-level parking facility.
Furt'lher i-eco�nmend that submission f second phase plains be made to the Planninj
Commission and City Council prior to .issuance of a,ay building permits for the
construction of additicnal floor and/or parking structures . The motion carried
ulaaninous1y.
Mot ion 2 :
Lynch ro )vod, Sehce seconded , to recommend to vie City Council that the Minnesota
Protective Life PUD development Stage revised plan be approved and that the
approximate 5 . 9 acre site be rezoned from the existing zoning to Office District
Per the conditions listed in the ;`larch 4 , 1976 planning staff rcpor.t and the
fol l ol- i ng ;
k. that the adjacent property owners be consulted and agree to
the type of fence s.rccning,
B. that Minnesota Protective Life Insurance Company be responsible
for any signalination at Leona Road and 169, and
C. that the developer be strongly Encouraged to consider
architecturally screening views from the windows on the
Wilding' s south side which are directed toward the residential properties
off the southeast corner of the building.
Tlie motion carried alnaninously.
`0 0►I c c+;
I'1: ttninl; Cc. . . c r !:i •: .t -3- !, r, h 22, 1976
B. CUidC. t'1 -0) '.'� _1`tt ^_, di �,ctr�.siun of rTO 0- ("1 cortract.
The planner infot:ncd, the Coil .iission that the city staff ha% plot with Brauer
rcgardinr, the worl. Irr•ogrx!i :ru(t cor.tract,lrit t.o(!.rtc no final document has been
drafted. lie then o+ttl ined a possiirle process for the update.
Pauly states' site sees the need f:. .norc detail in the kuide plan than was contained
in the 1913 Plan,and suggested th.(t regular updates be part of the new Guile i'lar.
Sorensen asked if norc distinct lines of zoning categories and tighter delineation
of areas would be use3 in the update.
Brauer responded affirmative. 111- stated that what has to be done now is to
recognize what has happened and decks how to build around the existing uses.
Sorensen th:.n osked if the Rural zoning Category would be a part of the new update.
i Brauer stated the update process will probably determine if a Rural catcRory
is necessary.
Riot i on:
Schce raved, Rearman secon3ed, to recc:nmend to the City Co;:ncil approval of the upd-te
process presented tonight as follows:
Citizen Involvement Process ,
I. Consultant selection.
2. Develop process, contract and study outline.
3. Staff/officials ScApar.
A. Revise process, contract and study outline.
S. City Council approve study design G Brauer contract.
6. ist NEIGHBOMOOD FORUMS - ( 6-7 ) to discuss the update ,
neighborhoo3 hroblers, recruit and stimulate GPU participation.
7. EDUCATIONAL Si MIMARS ( 4-6 ) to hroviec background inforAwation
for facilitators, officials and interested citizens.
8. CONMIUNITY FOt;i!;.� ** ( 1 , 2 or 3 ) city wide interaction sessions
that deal with raen Prairie' s realities and goals.
9. 1J,W%FT PL ,.' lii'D+'TF,thc st i f and advisory com Fissions will assist
the consult.-int in a 1st draft plin.
10. 2i:D F-0%"';•1S "* ( 6-7 ) to A c3 ci ti zrtr understanding
and ;vain local cc.-rmonts concerning the process at that point and
the draft plan update.
11. CUT-11INITY I-GUM ( 1 ) city wide session which prevents
the draft pLin tip date, ne-lg`thorhooJ forum inputs and relates the
draft plan to Rcality 6 Goals Forums.
12. RE\'iSFD L)?'AF'f PiAN UPDATE, the consultant,with help from the <<aff
and advisory corirrissions, will prepare a final draft plan update for
presentation to the City Cotincil.
13. ADVISORY Cn,"NI SSI t'1q RLV 1 i:V., cop:nrent , modi f i cat ions and reco:rr endat i ens
to ci ct• Council .
14. CITY CCUNCIL PU►ILIC i1F.nitlhG, formal City Council revicw, modification
and/or approval
1S. AITIUVED P1_1"; UI'll,17'E, submission to review agencies for formal
approval.
't The 6 to 7 Neighbei-hood F-rains depend un.;n resident participation
in first 1 or 20 ic. , if no neighborOood interest,substitution
of I or 2 city wide forurtts may be appropriate.
** The nunber of Coinnuni ty For►rms depend upon how well the
Nci ghhoi•hood Forums Work. 1 to 3 Community Forums can be
anticipated.
'•• 71e 6 to 7 Neignborhood Forums where the draft plan update is
discussed depends upon local hart�ic.pition. If no neight�orhood
interest in �cssioaas city wide forum will be substituted.
T}lc motion carri c d 6: 1 with Bearman voting Pay.
-:s � �f s•-��:.ti yr�r'.�`- ---,-�"�v�� �`-d:rb•,n�YYS1[ Y�� }�.�q "'�rZP..�-t�w��tc.`���y " �:..
C. i ::) : , + c . is >, .,1, it or Policies
Je,�Sc s, ] c ,port e(: f:Irt h,,-r t',or). and research is being done on the policy.
Mot i on
hosno(.)itSMice seconded, to continue the item to pei;nit the staff to
condact further research. The notion carried unanimously.
D. :':radon/':j,-cele Auto Dealerships, discussion of items for consideration in
the rezo„i ng agreez--crt . Wscussi on of Council requests and staff' report
dealing the site plan.
Tl;e planner read items the Council referred to the Planning Commission .
Sorensen asked if the parl;i_ng cf cars would be +v i thi n structures as suggested
by the Parks, Recreation and ;;atural Resources Commission .
Mr. t r auer stated the nature of the auto bt!3 Bless is such that outs] ae storage
is jr, -try.
Mrs. Kostecka felt an auto dealership :•rn.I., he suitc-a to an alt. cr'jat.e site
in the Ci i, as this -ite is a "hinc+c: " te. the City of Eden Prairie.
Lynch asked if the staff agrees with ''Ir. Bre-er' s ccnaputati: n of park ' and forr^nl n .
The planner s t ate(i he had not had sufficient tine to ;turfy the formula used by
Sai,e,,,sen reIinyuished t1w mohair to vice cbairrfrson Richard iynch.
0.0t ion 1
Soren c;: n,ov0d , ScliCe secondcd ,to recoj-,iWend the ci l-v rounci l nor ap-prove
the c ens: r��a;l;ng of the ordin.ince re_.oning :.he 4 ^l,to dC:ilorship sites
on all provio:Is stuff rC'j)i)T�S :;find t� ]"eCC: ;• :'rcl::t ::)1�`i of thic Planning Coi fission
and Perk--, tion and ';;it�lral R: .•�urccc C'e, ,, �is�ion . 'me motion carried
6 : 0: 1 . th Ptauly
Sc)1 :-T) 11 )'OSG,:led the chair.
Mot iun ? :
Lynch -;iox,cd, Pmj" Y Secondleu, Z lllat in t lle, evenit `he 1 sces fit to i s lore
tilt' ! �[ 1-' �t': on, Tiic P1 ,-nniiig Com!i? -s-.1 (fin mould tl',at tht_t1' be
bis oa the in Vie 3-3-76 stiff rc_.rort.
ri
Seiko l:,iS -:.:ii:1n5C any Ci'l �Cl'73 �. . �'�'C' � lle C'.�::1t �; iai� i3 ;+iJ l}. art+:-�C! LO
the re!ol-sing for m.:;ly i,c at`,-)ns .
Lynch wid Sot'ensC'n Ylol i cl e,l the Coi nc ] l has asked for a rc'cj, ',nso ;.nd '`;e ,Z aff
rcl _ x,:d pre; icie gui (,eii ,les a: 3 o:,tliae pro�1lc re :hick are
Vo<0 '"Tot.i or. 2 .
M,A ] on 2 carfij 3: 2 :2 ( Schee FT F-wi,istrom voted n:iy) , ( Bca, gran Sorensen
abst-wined } , and ( Lynch, P3111v f o r,vc}+t Voted aye ) .
F
F
:%iJ ,ij; Coroiiission Minutes -5- 14.)rch _'Z, 1976
Homart Development ComPan Sign Policy, discussion of March : , 1976 letter
Y
f -um Homart.
Lynch asked if Homart would only allow 6 exterior signs.
Jan Porter, Homart, responded that only 6 signs would be allowed excluding the
UA, Sears, Powers and two future major tenant's signs.
-i
Sorensen did not believe the letter from Homart clearly defined the necessary
criteria to -be used by Homart. in reviewing signs.
The Homart representatives felt such criteria could be submitted.
Motion :
Schee moved, Bearman seconded, to 2ccept the policy of exterior signage for
Homart to be used for the Eden Prairie Center, assuming it includes a maximum
of 6 signs at this time and that particular criteria, i. e. sign location, size, .
timing, etc. , be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval at the
earliest convenience.
Vote: The motion carried unanimously.
ETITIOIS ANTD RE t;E_STS. r'U`SI.IC 1?F:�RIN(:S.
A. Mitchell. lake PUD rev MW
�se� lattinv and rezoning for single family and multiple.
The PUD is located east of }-litchell Take and West of Co. Rd. 4 .
The pl annrr reviewed the hi story of the project anti the present rociuest .
Sorensen asked if he-mes could be placed on the lots without damage to the
natural amenities. Mr. nMompson, Pentom, said they would '_ ake a i 1 Precautions to
protect the amenities.
Strrclst rom inquired what the 4i stance has from the -units on the southeast' corner
of the project to the railroad. The planner estimated 250-300 feet .
Schce asked if the staff report recorurendations were MCcptable to the proponent .
Mr. 1/i 11 s-atcd they are in agreement with most of the rccon-mcndations and they
wovil d like to further work out details on the pathways and dock facilities .
Sc:renrcn r nkcd when the park Would be devc'. oiled. Mr. Thompson said tbey would
try to have it complcted by this Fall , if not , then early next SPri.ng.
F%-Lc-c rovtd, Fosr;ocht sc:ror&-d , to to the City C(I!Incil _.re onir.g from
R,.1:•31A to Rl - 17. S for ccn�-truction of al single family detscchcd ho^^s and
re.-oning to RM 6. 5 for 179 townhouse units as indicated on tlic preliminary
site plat c'ated N14rch 9, 1976. to t-he following; conditions :
A. Propr,c(-d site impr vcxt-nts for streets, utilities , storm- sewr.r,
rr%. , roct the performance standards of the City Engineering bepartment .
B. `''hnt t her *►i n i -Tsark ( -vpprox i r-:ntely 2. S-3 acres ) , be dedicated
-it thr time of fi rr,t phase development to the City and improved
by th^ d ve1c.1ver c,r honded for at th_ time of sale
to inform:Tl field game recreation space , i . e. softball ,
-. NA. „ - :v r,�..�.,. !rR. .;T-..[:-.. ::�'!"• T ,•,•f✓ "� •s*n.. �•,./1M4r -'l'► "f-•� -.T••.:."' { -..►^3�:".3-'� i♦ :�1 Y".. +r_„
J' tong Cr ...:i . . loll TI't �l�.i c 5 -6- I4� 22 , 1976 x
soccer, etc. Also, that an agreem-nt between the siogle family
and townhouse homeo%.n,•.r associations for maintenance of this
park area be included within the: homeowner's document .end/or �
convenants on the land to insure .the maintenance and development
of the area.
C. That a scenic easement no less than 75 feet from the 878
elevation be provided to insure no urban encroachment along
Mitchell Lake in the toi,mhouse section. in conjuni-tioa with
Ij
the scenic easement,a public trail easement be determined and
constructed by Pemtom of a soft surface limestone or- wood
chip surface. 7ne trail should be a minimum of six feet ,
in width along Mitchell Lake from the mini•-park to the
southern property boundary. The. trail will be for homeowner
z;
and public use. * `=
D. That an 8 foot hard surface patiiway be constructed along
Mitchell L ske Road from Co. Rd. 4 to the southwest cul -de. sac.
E. 'rhat a b foot hard surface pathway be constructed along
Mitchell Lake Court -from Mitchell Lake Road to either the
turn around before the island or the western intersection
of Mitchell Fake Lane to Mitchell Lake Court.
F, That adequate right -of-lay along Co. Rd. 4 be provided to
the City for construction of Co. Rd. 4 bikeway in conformance
with the Hikeway/Likcwav Report .
G. That all units in the single fam4 ly and to�rnhouse phases be
subject to a cash in lieu of land dedication fee consistent
with the policies to be adopted by the City. -
H. That prior to final plat approval, common lake access and
dockage facilities be approved by the City and Watershed District .
T . That Hennepin County Highway Department approve. the location
of Mi_tchall Lake Road and grant 'ail entrance permit.
J. That the soil erosion cont.ol and lakeshore deve;opm•.i�It standards
meet titi.ith approval of the Riley Purgatory 1ti'atershed District.
The motion carried unanimously.
Lotion_ 2 :
Sc.}iec r�o�=ed; Rearmio, seconded , that t'lze Planning Cormission close the public
hearing on the preliminary plat of the Mitchell j.ake PUD cc.iipri scd of 1-9
Loon}zcuse units and 81 Sinole family deta-hod homes. The motion carried u;iani ► cusly.
I-lot i on 3 :
Sc}-cc _Z.—oved , Bear)iian secondl`d , to r.'L.�),'micnd to the City ('o,mc-i:l approval of the
prel i r,i ►i.ary plat for the Mitchell Lake PUD subject to review and approval by the
City Engineering Dclr:rtment . The motion carried unani lousi-v.
Mot i on 4 :
Sc)iCI MOVOcl, tic:t1•,r,an seconded, that the Planning t'or;►T,ission finds the envi ron -
mental .,-;scs<mcnt provided by Pcmtom,plus the earlier ►UD submissions as suffi-
cient to judge the urban devclopment impact of the ritchell Lake PUD. The
motion parried unanimously. _
..T a6..ft. ...,y • _. :f'A^w :�.;f. S Tr'-. `-- •. ..✓:Y� 4.;�~�•rt�'?'¢f"..^"n ''i' r '''�'F • T C
March 22, i J76
B. Carnes/T.=n,pe:, pl :1t•ting,-(-quest to pTelirlinary plat_ 0 lots and 3 out Iots.
The site is :oc.ated north of hollow Creek Addition and cast of Bryant Lame.
11he planner stated the staff is rucomnending approval of the plot as submitted
as it is consistent with the previous rezoning.
Sorensen stated he would not vote on the item clue to personal friendship and
past business affiliations with the proponents .
Motion 1 :
Schee moved, Bearman seconded, to close the public hearing on the Carnes/Tangen
preliminary plat The motion carried 4:0:2 wit?, Sorensen and Bearman abstaining.
Motion 2 :
Schee moved, Lynch seconded , to recommend approval of the modified preliminary
plat dated 3-•22-76. The *notion carried 4 :0:2 with Bearman and Sorensen abstaining.
C. Prairie East 2nd Replatting, request by Hustad Development Corporation for
preliminary plat approval to rt plat the 64 lots of Prairie East 2n3
into 60 lots. The plat is located between Franlo Road and Co. Rd. 18.
The planner read the following letter from Mr. Kopesky.
!larch 17, 1976
Mr. Dick Patnam
Planner, City of Edea Prairie
' 6750 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, M. '
Dear m r, Putnaast
I talked with Bill Bonner Tuesday, March 16 about their replattiM
In t!•: Prairie East area. tic exple ned the riot an' the new
road alIrr�:cnt that vou,ld tersinite cm our property line now +end
and would Co thrv):h our pm,,rty at some time to the future.
.I don't ace wjy rrobItz uit:s this row Ik-.-gut ! the road
Situation.
Sincerely,
Cor&on Knpesky
Mr. Bonner reviewed the frontage width change, the pathway elimination between
lots, .-lid the elimination of a homcowner' s association.
_ Sclice asked if the plat would infringe on property other than Kopesky' s. _
The planner felt the maintenance of the park and pathways would have to be discussed
wi tb the developer.
Mot i on l
arri �n moved, rosnocht scc,.•1ic1ed, to close the public hearing on the Prairie fas�
,(I rc•rlattinf±. ;'he inoticr carried unanimousl,.
Motion 2 e Bearman moved, Fosnocht seconded, to recommend approval of the Prairie
fast 2r,d Addition replatting contingent an the reso7ution of the cash in lieu of
land and the handling of the park and ; -thi%.Ily w-aintenance prior to approval of the
final plat in col►folmaYlee with City po: icy. The motion carried unanimously.
�x�;"�4?,}�ti'�.�1';��t�' ^� --,�!`1pC'�s � '^�.'" _ a.""_'�+�.e�'E"�� "'�-�i�,'' -.`�� C; + ,�.:..... :,• ;�;�'•'`".="'R '�G'�.r! '^C'�`��.' s1'k,t•',r3
r j
ap;:ro� cd
C ,...,•:issiM t•iirlutV-, -Si- March 22, 1976
Identification Sign for the South Campus , Hennepin County Technical Center.
Lynch asked why the i"' em was or; the commission' s agenda since it is not
a PUD sign request.
'I r larner stated tl,.� use does :of con A. to the Sign Ordinance and t1iC btaCF
suggested c,ie Planning Commission review the request.
Sorensen suggested that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments would be the proper
UP
review group under the ordinance.
41
Motion
Fosnocht moved, Lymch seconded , that the item be referred to the Board of .Appeals
and .Adjustments with the Planning Commission' s recommendation that the request
be approved..
VI. NEW BUSINIESS. none
111. MEMBERS REPORTS
A. Chairman Don. Sorensen. He informed the commission that
invocation at meetings is being questioned.
Schee a,-,J Fosnoclit stated they are Fro invocation.
Sund:stro:n stated he has no objection tn an invocation.
Bearman stated he is opposed to invocation being Riven at public meetings.
The commission agreed to discuss the item at the next meeting.
B. Counci l Representative Sidney Pauly. Wane
C. Cyt lie rs
1 . i:od Sundstroa,-Hennepin County Trsnsportat i on '•'d-et i ng. Due to the
late hour the it_c;n was continued. \
V1I . P1;1\.\ RS REPORT.
a. The pl;: nner informad the corsrr.ission the staff is +•corking on rczpc; r.--.e to the
Chamber' s duostions and suggestions on the Sign. Ordinance.
b. Tiie pl :inner explained that a retort would he `orthcc-,ring on, tac deve:opr.rnt
costs in the City of Eden I'rai.ri_e.
c. The plarmer inforned the co: -mission upcoming projects are f dengato and
rc:est Knolls Second Addition.
VI I . ADJn1'RN T_N7.
Bearman r A •• d, Simd�trom cecc»�cl�d, to .�djot�rn at 12 :dp ;�,�,. The rot ion c,,rric.i,
Respectfully ;SlibmitteJ
Jcan Johnson
--:�`'. �A4�Ee:i:s�.'�'�'71t�R9lw-�...-•a-.s.ta.ire.rs.a.e...rw......�,....�__.._ `...,._