Loading...
Planning Commission - 01/12/1987 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, January 12, 1987 7:30 p.m. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Ed Schuck, Richard Anderson, Julianne Bye, Christine Dodge, Virginia Gartner, Robert Hallett, Charles Ruebling STAFF MEMBERS: Chris Enger, Director of Planning; Michael Franzen, Senior Planner; Don Uram, Assistant Planner; Kate Karnas, Administrative Assistant Pledge of Allegiance--Roll Call I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA II. MEMBERS REPORTS III. MINUTES IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS *(7:35) A. RIDGEWOOD WEST PLAT SIXTH ADDITION, by Centex Homes Corp. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 101 acres with variances, Zoning District Change from R1-13.5 to RM-2.5 on 8.1 acres and Preliminary Plat of 8.1 acres into 11 lots and 4 outlots for construction of 76 condominium units. Location: North and east of Wellington Drive, north and west of Cumberland Road. A continued public hearing. *(8:05) B. THE TREE FARM, by Countryside Investments, Inc. Request for Com- prehensive Guide Plan Change from Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 11.3 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1- 13.5 on 33.6 acres, Preliminary Plat of 33.6 acres into 78 single family lots and road right-of-way. Location: South of County Road #1, west of Surrey Street. A continued public hearing. *(8:35) C. SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK/PRESERVE MEDICAL BUILDING, by Supplee's 7-Hi Enterprises, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Office on 1.09 acres, Zoning District Change , from Rural to Office on 1.09 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals and Preliminary Plat of 1.09 acres into one lot for the construction of a two-story office building. Location: South of Anderson Lakes Parkway, west of County Road #18. A continued public hearing. *(8:40) D. WESTWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION, by Dallas Development Com- pany. Request for Preliminary Platting of 20 acres into two lots within the Westwood Industrial Park. Location: South of County Road #67 and East of Bury Drive. A public hearing. *(8:55) E. MITCHELL ESTATES, by Ray Mitchell . Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.04 acres and preliminary platting of 1.04 acres into two lots and road right-of-way. Location: Southeast quadrant of Scenic Heights Road and Hiawatha Avenue. A public hearing. Agenda Planning Commission Monday, January 12, 1987 Page Two *(9:10) F. CARMEL 6 & 7, by Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 58 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review within an R1-13.5 zoning district on 16.26 acres with variances for lot frontage, zoning district change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.66 acres, and preliminary platting of 16.26 acres into 27 single family lots and road right-of-way. Location: North of Fallbrook Road and east of Thornhill Road. A public hearing. V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. PLANNER'S REPORT VIII. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: THE TIMES LISTED ABOVE ARE TENTATIVE, AND MAY BE SIGNIFICANTLY EARLIER, OR LATER, THAN LISTED. MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, January 12, 1987 School Board Meeting Room 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Ed Schuck, Julianne Bye, Christine Dodge, Virginia Gartner (8:15 p.m.) , Robert Hallett MEMBERS ABSENT: Rich Anderson, Chuck Reubling STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger, Director of Planning; Michael Franzen, Senior Planner; Kate Karnas, Administrative Assistant Pledge of Allegiance--Roll Call I . APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Bye, to adopt the agenda as printed. Motion carried--4-0-0 II . MEMBERS REPORTS None. III. MINUTES MOTION: Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Hallett, to approve the minutes of the November 24, 1986, Planning Commission meeting as printed. Motion carried--3-0-1 (Dodge abstained) k IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. RIDGEWOOD WEST PLAT SIXTH ADDITION, by Centex Homes Corp. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 101 acres with variances, Zoning District Change from R1-13.5 to RM-2.5 on 8.1 acres and Preliminary Plat of 8.1 acres into 11 lots and 4 outlots for construction of 76 condominium units. Location: North and east of Wellington Drive, north and west of Cumberland Road. A continued public hearing. At its December 8, 1986, meeting, the Planning Commission continued this item pending revision by the proponents based on concerns raised by the neighborhood and in the Staff Report of December 5, 1986, on the proposed • development. Planning Commission Minutes 2 January 12, 1987 Planner Enger reported that the proponent had held a neighborhood meeting on Thursday evening, January 8, 1987, but did not have detailed plans finished in time for this Planning Commission meeting. Because of this, proponents were again requesting a continuance in order to provide for resolution of the concernss according to the direction given by the majority of the Commission at its December 8, 1986, meeting. Mr. Tom Boyce, representative from Centex Homes, reviewed the changes made so far in the plans. He pointed out that there had been a realignment of the interior road which was designed to eliminate any direct access to Wellington Drive. He stated that there was now a different mix of structures within the proposed development. The revised plans showed twice the nubmer of four-unit structures, thereby eliminating four units and reducing the number of total units for the proposal to 68 units. He noted that the internal private drivees and parking areas had been altered in order to provide for more room for landscaping within the development. Finally, the architecture was more defined than before, and more in line with what was existing within the adjacent existing structures within the Westover development. Planner Franzen stated that Staff had not had an opportunity to review the proposed revisions. He pointed out that one of the major concerns of the Staff previously, and with this plan, was transition to the adjacent existing developments. He stated that it was Staff's opinion that the • proponent would need to increase the setbacks to the north and west property lines, provide for greater berming height, and provide for heavier plantings on the berms. He stated that another possibility for providing transition may include the provision of more four-unit structures along the perimeter of the site, thereby placing the eight-unit structures toward the interior of the site. Mr. John Ginn, 8961 Knollwood Drive, stated that he was opposed to the proposed development and that he would prefer the property to be developed as single family residential, similar to the was the adjacent sites were developed. He stated that he was also concerned with transition to the adjacent, existing developments and that he was concerned about the proposed density in terms of impact on the neighborhood park in the area. Mr. Ginn stated that one of his major concerns was that of increased traffic from the development if it were allowed at the higher density. He added that units such as those proposed were likely to become rental, instead of owner- occupied and that he was concerned that renters may not be as concerned about maintaining their property as homeowners were. Mr. Ned Devine, 8811 Hawthorne Drive, stated that he concurred with the statements of Mr. Ginn, in particular with respect to potential traffic impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. Ms. Janis Krall, 8966 Knollwood Drive, stated that she was aware that there was the potential for the property to become multiple family, and had reviewed the overall development plan available in the sales office at the • time, showing such development. She stated that she was not concerned because the road access to the site was not located directly across from her home. However, the revised plans showed the access directly in front of her home. She stated that she would not have purchased the home if she had Planning Commission Minutes 3 January 12, 1987 known that b the case. ow a this would d e Ms. Cindy Doms, 13949 Wellington Drive, stated that she had signed forms at the time of closing on her home that indicated that she was aware of the fact that multiple residential development may take place across from her property. She stated that there were many forms to be signed at closing time, and that this issue was "breezed over. " She stated that she felt the matter had been misrepresented to her at that time, as it would have impacted her decision to purchase. Ms. Doms stated that she would like a better explanation of the zoning change which had taken place on the property. Planner Enger reviewed the history of the zoning and development approvals on the property. Hallett asked Ms. Krall who had informed her about the potential development across from her. Ms. Krall responded that she discussed the matter at length with Michael Livingston from the Centex sales staff. She stated that he had told her that the property was designated for multiple residential, that it likely would develop as single family residential, similar to her property. She added that they discussed the access road location at length, to the point where she was sure that it would not be located directly across from her home based on what he represented to her. Dodge asked if anyone in the audience had contacted the City with respect to the status of this property prior to purchasing their home. Of the approximately 20 members of the audience attending the meeting for this issue, no one responded that they had contacted the City. Mr. Boyce stated that the multiple family residential development was listed in the bylaws for the property. He ,stated that Centex had tried to make people aware of their plans for multiple development in the future. Mr. Michael Mlazgal, 13983 Wellington Drive, expressed concern regarding traffic and safety of the children in the area, if this intense of a development were approved for the property. He added that he was also concerned as it was his opinion that there was neglect on the part of Centex to keep up-to-date on maintenance matters within the development. He questioned what this might mean to a multiple family development and the impact of a poorly maintained development on the value of his property. Ms. Judith Mulvey, 13973 Wellington Drive, stated that she felt the development of this property as multiple family residential would break up the continuity of the neighborhood, in that the rest of the area had been developed as single family residential . She stated that she was concerned that people living in the multiple family units would not have the same priorities as those in owner-occupied homes in terms of upkeep of property, etc. Mr. Dennis L. Wavra, 13980 Wellington Drive, stated that he felt it was logical for the property to be developed as single family residential, based on the existing zoning of the property and the existing development of the surrounding neighborhoods. Hallett stated that he was pleased to see that Centex had taken positive Planning Commission Minutes 4 January 12, 1987 steps in redesign of the project. He stated that he did t p g p � i no feel that any decision of the Planning Commission would be made based on the opinion that people living in multiple family residential housing were "second class citizens" and less interested in the maintenance of their property. He pointed out that the road and other utility systems in the area were planned based upon this property being developed as multiple family residential ; therefore, people could be assured that the public utilities and facilities had been built to handle the capacity of residents proposed. Hallett stated that he felt the zoning and land use guiding on the property were confusing to everyone. He asked Staff for a detailed explanation of the history of this property with respect to the zoning and guiding. Planner Enger explained that, prior to the time when Centex had purchased this property, the City had designated the land as Medium Density Residential. In 1978, Centex had purchased the property and proposed a development to the City that was completely single family in nature, or Low Density Residential. The change was made at that time to R1-13.5 zoning and to Low Density Residential . In 1982, Centex returned to the City with a proposal for a total of 168 units on the property, showing a mixture of single family homes, cluster homes, and condominiums. At that time, the Comprehensive Guide Plan was amended to return the property to Medium Density Residential and Centex began rezoning portions of the property from R1-13.5 to match the unit types they had proposed, or RM-6.5 and R1-9.5. Some of the property for single family development was also designated as R1-13.5, particularly along Purgatory Creek where the single family lots were larger. This particular piece of property was part of what was reguided in 1982 to Medium Density Residential. However, since Eden Prairie does not rezone property without a specific plan, this property was not rezoned from R1-13.5 in 1982, and it was not proposed to be rezoned until such time as a plan was presented with the exact use delineated in order that the City could rezone according to a specific plan. Planner Enger stated that the current status of the property was that it had an approved Planned Unit Development Concept plan for multiple family residential 96 units and that it was designated for Medium Density Residential development according to the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The existing zoning of R1-13.5 was "left over" from a previously approved plan, which was superceded by the 1982 Planned Unit Development Concept. The City, and Centex, expected that a proposal would be forthcoming for multiple family residential on this property which would match the land use of the Comprehensive Guide Plan ,for Medium Density Residential and which would request rezoning to some form of multiple family designation. Mr. Devine asked how the City staff would have responded, if asked what the property was zoned. Planner Enger stated that it was possible that someone might simply respond that the property was zoned R1-13.5. However, he stated that the Planning Staff was careful recognize areas such as this and would have made a more full explanation of both the zoning and the land use • guiding designation for the property. He pointed out that this was one of a handfull of parcels in the community where there was such confusion. Generally, the property which had not been developed in the City was zoned Rural, alerting people to the fact that anything was possible. Planning Commission Minutes 5 January 12, 1987 Bye asked that Staff provide an outline of the approval history on this property for the next meeting, delineating the zoning and guiding history on the development. Planner Enger responded that this would be done. Mr. Ginn asked how this proposed development could be considered an asset to the community. Mr. Boyce responded that the original purpose of this overall mixed residential development was to provide for a variety of housing in the City, which, he felt, Centex had accomplished. MOTION: Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Dodge, to continue this item to the February 9, 1987, Planning Commission meeting pending receipt of revised plans from the proponent. Motion carried--4-0-0 (Gartner arrived at 8: 15 p.m. ) B. THE TREE FARM, by Countryside Investments, Inc. Request for Com- prehensive Guide Plan Change from Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 11.3 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1- 13.5 on 33.6 acres, Preliminary Plat of 33.6 acres into 78 single family lots and road right-of-way. Location: South of County Road #1, west of Surrey Street. A continued public hearing. Planner Enger explained that, at the November 24, 1986, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission determined that the relationship of this project to the Flying Cloud Airport Safety Zone B was a primary consideration. The Commission continued the item to allow time for resolution of the conflict with Safety Zone B . Subsequent to that meeting, the proponent revised the subdivision, removing all lots within the area designated as being within Safety Zone B. They also continued discussions with the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) staff. It was the determination of the MAC staff that the proposed development did, in fact, meet the intent of the model ordinance in terms of density and, therefore, intensity of development acceptable within the Safety Zone B area. This was approved by their governing agency, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, as well . A letter would be forthcoming acknowledging this. Planner Enger stated that the possibility of MAC purchasing the property was also discussed. It was determined that MAC was not interested in purchasing the land. Mr. Ron Krueger, representing proponent, asked if it would be necessary for the proponents to construct the trail along County Road #1 at this time. He pointed out that the trail would not be connecting to any other trail to the • east, or west, at this time. In addition, even it were built, an asphalt trail , unused, would likely become unsightly due to the growth of weeds and grasses through the asphalt over a short period of time. Bye stated that the City had encountered difficulties in neighborhoods where Planning Commission Minutes 6 January 12, 1987 trails were installed after the homeowners were moved into their homes. She stated that the trail was necessary, eventually, along County Road #1 and that it would be important to inform the future residents of this subdivision that this trail would be installed. Hallett asked if the City would be responsible for construction of the trail if it were not built at this time. Planner Enger stated that this could be the case, but that it was also possible that the City could require the developer to provide a bond for future construction of the trail, instead. Gartner asked if it would be possible to place signage in the area indicating the location of the BFI landfill and the Fly4ng Cloud Airport in close proximity to this property. She stated that she felt it would be appropriate to notify the future and potential residents of this area of what type of neighbors they had from the beginning. Planner Enger stated that the City could provide for directional -type signs indicating this information. He noted that this had been done in the Bluffs West 2nd Addition. Bye added that she felt this should possibly be done for the future trail , as well . Mr. Al Lange, 13801 Pioneer Trail , manager of Elliott Beech Craft, one of the business operations at Flying Cloud Airport, expressed concern that this property was located within the "noise footprint" of the airport. He stated that he felt the airport was a public asset to the community, a sizable employer, and that he felt residents should be given fair warning as soon as possible that they would be in close proximity to the airport. He stated that he felt this was a pre-existing condition, along with the landfill, and Highway #169, that the future residents should be made aware of up front, prior to purchase of their property. Mr. Denny Daugaard, 12390 Surrey Street, asked for a detailed explanation of the changes to the plan from the previous proposal. Mr. Krueger reviewed the changes and noted the area where several lots had been eliminated. Mr. Gary Schmidt, MAC staff representative, stated for the record that MAC was now of the opinion that the plan, as currently proposed, met the intent of the model ordinance for Safety Zone B . He stated that he was certain that the letter confirming this would be in the hands of the City prior to review of this matter by the City Council. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to recommend to the City • Council approval of the request of Countryside Investments for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 11.3 acres for the Tree Farm, based on plans dated January 8, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated November 21, 1986, and January 9, 1987, and with the added direction that the City be responsible Planning Commission Minutes 7 January 12, 1987 for providing directional signage regarding the location of the BFI landfill, the Flying Cloud Airport, the future trail , and that the proponent be responsible for providing this information about pre-existing conditions to the future residents of the development in writing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Countryside Investments for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 for 33.6 acres for the Tree Farm, based on plans dated January 8, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated November 21, 1986, and January 9, 1987, and with the added direction that the City be responsible for providing directional signage regarding the location of the BFI landfill, the Flying Cloud. Airport, the future trail, and that the proponent be responsible for providing this information about pre-existing conditions to the future residents of the development in writing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Countryside Investments for Preliminary Plat of 33.6 acres into 72 single family -lots for the Tree Farm, based on plans dated January 8, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated November 21, 1986, and January 9, 1987, and with the added direction that the City be responsible for providing directional signage regarding the location of the BFI landfill, the Flying Cloud Airport, the future trail, and that the proponent be responsible for providing this information about pre-existing conditions to the future residents of the development in writing. Motion carried--5-0-0 C. SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK/PRESERVE MEDICAL BUILDING, by Supplee's 7-Hi Enterprises, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Office on 1.09 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 1 .09 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals and Preliminary Plat of 1.09 acres into one lot for the construction of a two-story office building. Location: South of Anderson Lakes Parkway, west of County Road #18. A continued public hearing. Planner Enger reported that, at its meeting of December 16, 1986, the City Council took action to continue this item to a later Council meeting, meanwhile returning it to the Planning Commission for additional review. Staff had met with the proponents in the interim. At this time, plans were not available for review. Therefore, the proponents have requested a two- week continuance. Planning Commission Minutes 8 January 12, 1987 MOTION: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to continue to the January 26, 1987, Planning Commission meeting per the request of the proponents. Motion carried--5-0-0 D. WESTWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION, by Dallas Development Com- pany. Request for Preliminary Platting of 20 acres into two lots within the Westwood Industrial Park. Location: South of County Road #67 and East of Bury Drive. A public hearing. Planner Franzen explained that this was basically a "housekeeping" item for the proponent. He noted that proponent was requesting the splitting of one lot into two lots for purposes of sale of the property. Mr. Bernie Frye, representative of Dallas Development Company, stated that the building being constructed on the future lot was a mirror image of the existing structure. He noted that the structure met all City Code requirements. Planner Enger informed the Commission that this type of subdivision would likely be more frequently reviewed by the Commission in the future. He stated that, previously, this type of simple subdivision was handled . administratively. However, by requiring the proponents to be processed through platting review, it was much more clear that necessary utility easements were obtained, vacated, and recorded where required. Chairman Schuck asked for comments, or questions, from members of the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Gartner, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Gartner, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Dallas Development Company for Preliminary Plat of 20 acres into two lots within the Westwood Industrial Park, based on plans dated December 30, and 31, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 9, 1987. Motion carried--5-0-0 E. MITCHELL ESTATES, by Ray Mitchell . Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.04 acres and preliminary platting • of 1.04 acres into two lots and road right-of-way. Location: Southeast quadrant of Scenic Heights Road and Hiawatha Avenue. A public hearing. Planner Enger explained that this was a "simple subdivision, " wherein Mr. Planning Commission Minutes 9 January 12, 1987 Mitchell was requesting the splitting of his relatively large lot to build another home on the property. Mr. Ray Mitchell presented a plan for the home to be built on the property, indicating that he felt it would blend well with the existing homes in the neighborhood. Chairman Schuck asked for comments, or questions, from members of the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Dodge, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Ray Mitchell for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1.13.5 on 1 .04 acres for Mitchell Estates, based on plans dated December 29, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 9, 1987. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Ray Mitchell for Preliminary Plat approval of 1 .04 acres into two lots for residential development to be known as Mitchell Estates, based on plans dated December 29, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 9, 1987. Motion carried--5-0-0 F. CARMEL 6 & 7, by Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 58 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review within an R1-13.5 Zoning District on 16.26 acres with variances for lot frontage, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.66 acres, and preliminary platting of 16.26 acres into 27 single family lots and road right-of-way. Location: North of Fallbrook Road and east of Thornhill Road. A public hearing. Mr. Hans Hagen, proponent, explained that there were several changes to the previously approved Carmel Addition preliminary plat which required the review of the Planning Commission due to the extent of the changes involved. Mr. Hagen explained that, due to the grade of the property, it was not possible to provide the connection to the Ward Holasek property to the west as was presented in the original preliminary plat. Alternative access had been provided to Mr. Holasek 's site. The 50 ft. wide right-of-way for access to the east was, therefore, eliminated. Planning Commission Minutes 10 January 12, 1987 Secondly, Mr. Hagen stated that there was one lot in the northeast area of the subdivision which had been designed to have road frontage on three sides. In reviewing the platting in greater detail, it was found that a slight realignment of the road would provide for the lot to be a "normal" corner lot, eliminating one of the road frontages for that lot. Lastly, after detailed discussions with the Director of Community Services, it was determined that it would be appropriate to "swap" small parcels of property between the park and the developer in order to provide for better access to the park and better design of lots for the proponent. Therefore, this change was also being requested at this time. Mr. Hagen noted that a 20 ft. wide easement for vehicle access to the park was also being provided with this revised platting. Mr. Hagen stated that, overall, the elimination of the 50 ft. right-of-way access to the property to the east, the realignment of the road, and the swapping of property with the City resulted in the addition of a portion of property back into the subdivision, which provided for one more lot, overall, within the Carmel development. Chairman Schuck asked for comments, or questions, from members of the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Dodge, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hans Hagen Homes for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment of approximately 58 acres for Carmel 6th and 7th Additions, based on plans dated December 30, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 9, 1987. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hans Hagen Homes for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District amendment within the R1-13.5 Zoning District for 16.26 acres; with variances for lot frontage, and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 for 0.66 acre, for Carmel 6th and 7th Additions, based on plans dated December 30, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of January 9, 1987. . Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Planning Commission Minutes 11 January 12, 1987 Council approval of the request of Hans Hagen Homes for Preliminary Plat of 16.26 acres into 27 single family lots for Carmel 6th and 7th Additions, based on plans dated December 30, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 9, 1987. Motion carried--5-0-0 V . OLD BUSINESS None. VI . NEW BUSINESS None. VII . PLANNER'S REPORT None. VIII . ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Hallett, seconded by Bye. Chairman Schuck adjourned the meeting at 9:35 p.m. •