Planning Commission - 09/08/1980 :..• ... W . _ . Y. . 4 Yrl Ii �u •• .. u rr Jr Y III dY►Y u u u uY r.rl iu • ,L u u .,. . .�YYu.iX - V■ iW1 Wke
I
A
AGENDA
Eden Prairie Planning_ Cq missian Meeting
Monday, September 8, i9au
7: %~ PM, City Hall
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman William Bearman , Liz Retterath , George
Bentley, Grant Sutliff, Virginia Gartner, Hakon
Toriesen. Matthew Levitt
STAFF ►` MEMBERS: Chris Enger, Director of Planning; Jean Johnson ,
Assistant Planner; Sue Schulz, Planning Secretary
Pledge of Allegiance -- Roll Call
I . APPROVAL OF AGENDA
II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM AUGUST 25, 1980
III . MEMBERF 1EPORTS
IV. DEVELOP1ENT PROPOSALS
A. PRAIRIE LAKES CONDOMINIUMS, by Prairie Lakes Corporation & The
Preserve, Request or PUD Development Plan revision A reolatting
•° of Block 6, Lot 1, Basswood Forest for construction of 252 condo-
miniums. Located North of AWerron Lakes Parkway is Northwest of
Basswood Road. A public hearing.
B. PIRAW S FI T ADDITION, by Richard Piram. Request to preliminary
p at approx mate Ty1 acre zoned k1-13. 5 into 2 lots. Located in
the NMrthealt corner of Deck Lake Trail A Bait jr• Lane. A pwbiic
hearing.
LAKE RILEY ESTATE , by Leonard Swedlund. 4est to preliminary
plat + acres-tdned Rural, into 3 'tots. r ..ed north bf Lake
Riley and East of Chanhassen. A public hearing.
D. MENARD ADDITION REPLAT, by Menard, Inc. Request to replat Outlots
, E, & f. Menard Aaditiorv. The easterly portion of Meftrd Addi- —
tion. A ' public hearing.
V. OLD BUSINESS
VI. NEW BUSINESS
VII . PLANNER'S REPORT
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
i
_i
MINUTES
ME'i, n Vii iN i L POUNI''It Isis UO3 C.%NII Il a i V1%
approved
Monday, September 8, 1980 7:30 PM ; City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman William Bea man , Liz Retterath, George
Bentley, Grant Sutliff, Virginia Gartner, Matthew
Levitt
MEMBERS ABSENT: Hakon Torjesen
STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger, Director of Planning ; Sue Schulz ,
Planning Secretary
I . APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Sutliff moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Gartner seconded , motion
carried 6-0.
II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM AUGUST 25 1980
p. 3 para. #1 , second line, should real. . . Phase II of Lakeridge , more
grading would be requ i 1-td.
p. 5 Under Mot' m 4, change Toriesen to Bearman voted nay.
Bentley moved to approve the minutes of August 25, 1980 with the above
changes and/or additions. Gartner seconded , motion carried 6-0.
III . MEMBERS nEPORTS
None
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. PRAIRIE LAKES CONDOMINIUMS, by Prairie Lakes Corporation & The Preserve.
Request for PUD Development Plan revision & replatting of Block 6, Loi
1 , Basswood Forest for construction of 252 condominiums. Located North
of Anderson Lakes Parkway & Northwest of Basswood Road. A public hearing.
Beaman reviewed the letter from The Preserve dated 9/4/80 requesting to postpone
the public hearing until September 22, 1980.
Motion
Gartner moved to continue to the September 22, 1980 meeting. Bentley seconded.
motion carried 6-0.
B. PIRAM'S FIRST ADDITION, by Richard Piram. Request to preliminary plat
approx mate y 1 acre zoned R1-13.5 into 2 lots . Located in the North-
east corner of Duck Lake Trail & Barberry Lane. A public hearing.
The Planner introduced Mr. Richard Piram and Cal Ladd , of Calhoun Realty.
Ladd went over the plans for the division of the property.
�.-.�_.r _-. . ..K�.. . �.�x��r,-a..y s't..�.J,--::,: -,.ti�:' -•''.��.�#t,.:*.►�•"*: .- .:-s-, s ::k'r::.�:-.-�'?.sY 1"'.�i,�'
E
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 8, 1980
Levitt asked if the outbuildingis detached. Laid stated that the outbuilding is
9
on different nrnnPrty:
The Planner reviewed the staff report dated 9/4/80 and stated that both lots meet
the minimum lot size.
Bentley asked if the existing structures should also have a cash park fee . The
Planner replied the .staff is investigatino.
R31ph Lauro, 17301 Barberry Circle liked why this proposal was a public hearing.
Bearman replied since all the neighbors did not sign the administrative division
the owner applied For a plat.
George Kissinger, 6601 Barberry Lane, was concerned with the cutting down of trees .
Owen Gehlert, owner of the property, stated that 2 small basswood trees would be
cut down.
Sue Lauro, 17301 Barberry Circle was concerned with the driveway. Gehlert stated
that there are footage requirements that have to be met.
Levitt stated that a staff recommendation was to have the driveway on Barberry Lane .
The Planner stated that because of heavy traffic on Duck Lake Trail , the driveway
should go on Barberry Lane.
Ra ; ph Lauro, 17301 Barberry Circle stated that he felt that the trees should be
• saved.
Motion I
Levitt moved to close the public hearing. Retterath seconded , motion carried 6-0.
Motion 2
Levitt moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Piram 1st Addition
as per the plan dated 8/12/80 and the 9/4/80 staff report. Retterath seconded ,
motion carried 6-0.
C. LAKE RILEY ESTATES, by Leonard Swedlund. Request to preliminary
plat 14+ acres zoned Rural into 3 lots. Located North of Lake
Riley and East of Chanhassen. A public hearing.
The Planner introduced Mr. Leonard Swedlund and Mr. David Squire of McKombs/Knutson ,
representing Mr. Swedlund.
Squire reviewed the proposal and stated that the proponent would like a variance on
the lot size and side setback requirements.
The Planner reviewed the staff report dated 9/4/80 and stated that the lots will not
meet the mean width of 300 ft.
Bentley asked what would happen to the remaining buildings after 3 are remved.
Squire replied that they wi l l remain.
Levitt asked if the homes on the surrounding lots were built prior to the Shoreland
Management Act and asked if the hones are outside of the KJSA line. The Planner
replied yes to both questions.
arov
Planning Comission Minutes 3 Septteemberd8. 1980
Levitt asked if t'"ere are any requir nts for footage. The Planner replied yes,
2500 ft.
Motion 1
BentTey moved to close the public hearing. Sutliff seconded, motion carried 6-0.
Moi ton 2
ent ey moved to recomnend to the City Council approval of the Lake Riley Estates
plat dated 8/11/80 as per the staff report of 9/4/80.
DISCUSSION
ut stated that he wanted to change the second recommendation in the staff
report to read. . .Building plans for lots 2 and 3 shall be subject to Watershed
District review and approval .
Levitt felt that the parcel could be divided into 2 rather than 3 lots and meet
all ordinance requirements.
lbticm was seconded by Retterath and carried 4-2. Bearman and Levitt voted nay.
D. RENARD ADDITION REPLAT, by Menard, Inc. Request to replat Outlots
nar Lion. The easterly portion of Renard Addition.
A public hearing.
The Planner introduced Mr. Dan Johnson of Suburban Engineering and Mr. Mary
Prochaska of Menard's, Inc.
Johnson reviewed the Renard Addition •nd stated that because of problems , the
proponent wants to replat. He also stated that the preponert would like to relocate
Plata Drive so that access can be provided to lots off of Schooner Blvd because
of engineering problems . He also stated that there will be some screening done for
tife views of the hoses near the s i to.
The Planner reviewed the staff report of 9/5/80 and stated that the main difference
in grading is by Schooner Blvd.
Levitt asked if Topview Road would intersect with Valley view Road. The Planner
stated tlat it is not proposed at this tiwt.
Sutliff asked if Topview Road has access to other roadways. The Planner stated
that tlw. e are 2 roadways connectinq with Topview.
fenatley astad if there is a plan for bemfng and landstapinq. The Planner replied no,
3entley asked if the main problem is that they cannot build the road as originally
prw*W becsu!Le of the sewer line. The P 1 anner reel i red yes it i s.
Levitt asked i f, i n re comwWa ti on 03 of the Staff reMrt , arera l l Aea"s the entire
ate. The Planner replied yes but stated that reconstruction of Valley View Road
rats to be dolt befwe they can gain access.
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 8, 1980
Levitt asked what the land use designations were. Johnson replied that they did
not know but that they assumed Outlots D b E to be commercial .
Levitt stated that the staff report shows many things that the proponent has not
done.
Bentley stated that he felt that the proponents should return.
Bill Verkuilen, 12650 V#1ley View Road, presented photos of the views from his
backyard. These photos are part of tie minutes.
John Reedy, 7262 Gordon Drive, represgnting the residents from Topview stated
that the residents feel that the siteilooka- m+uch different than proposed. He
also read 2 quotes from -Zone 4: AM Book, and stated that he felt that there is
a need for sensitive development for the entire site but also felt that with the
proper .screeiing andLI berming, that the site will look fine:
Jerry Spei bean, 6601 Golden Ridge Drive felt that the plan needs sensitivity.
Apxnadine Moser. 1263 Topview, felt that Menara `s has let down the neighborhood
John Reedy, 7262 Gordon Drive, asked tho comission to recom and modification.
ner asked if Valley View Road was promised to be done by July, 19,30. The Planner
stated that Plaza Drive could be connected to Valley View Road if improvements werj
not done.
Levitt asked Prochaska if they would like this to be returned to them for revision.
Prochaska replied yes.
Motion
ev tt moved to continue the public hearing to September 22, 1980. Bentley seconded ,
motion carried 6-0.
V. OLD BUSINESS
Intone
1 . 11EN BUSINESS
$Wti i'*f f it that the now iho. Of name 1ielOs revision. w _
Sutliff further stated that he felt that the ordinance is very vaque.
The Planner stated that Comissioner- Sutliff .could go to the City Council
with suggested revisions.
A'.:^�1?z*s' '>itr�"s•.:S:r:�l. -- rS-•«•-r--`•n• •;' r- �-.:R�''e. •i,-.�aF-!p •: i`'.',!1!({l:,e':?!M!'�..•rx. K...yyy� 'tS. 5, .Q '^'.r..•• - :v ..
. :4.♦ .. ., .. 4w'r ry :-`-T' c�'�'. ..1..'34'• .b �¢'''_ -"'t°�SM��"i�''eK M}'h+�.Lba i' '
a 7 , A.
_ «:mac-�' (-�' _� ,'•• .�'.
wt
�!�!ti� ��'�1�•;' V.J. '�a � •""_` ` a �r '
i.} ', � �. ''�;�.fl. ���� �` ±� fir.7� •���f, . 1'i T .a
� 'j � �t �M-'.x� i�=�b•S*- -.�e$�ic�',.,C.a.�•�,�4,�*:•+yf fy-r -.•.4Fa-4.uw-
.. - -• t�`:- j'•.a � tt '� S a -.Y y z�' ��. rqj t �r.i ��3�'~�,
_,t i •, i•�n ti 6
1� -'. , •- '� ice:
v k.yis
J
•'" � let �,j�sr _`� - �
fit. � '�•�,• !!'.:Y� !^�'`?' .�. >f r ti �'� c- � a' � �..L
' f l ....,a a,.i• -.:.-.t T• 1 .y !- 'J' + _"y �' ram• •a
61
+ io s. ` y,
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -5- r..^�^�.'-�- o! 'Iftms
VII . PLANNER'S REPORT
The Planner stated that Hartford is ready to start grading their 2nd lot
and showed what they are doing.
The Planner stated that Eide' s Knoll , Dolejsi Addition, and CNR Goldei
Strip East are coming up at the September 22, 1980 meeting.
The Planner also stated that Monday, October 13, is Columbus Day and
anted the Planning Commission to chooss another date for the meeting.
�~ Searman suggested Tu"day, October 14. The Commission so moved and the motion
carried unanimiovtiy.
VIII . ANUIRNMENT
Bentley moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:02 PM. Gartner seconded , motion
carried 6-0.
J
' 1
r