Loading...
Planning Commission - 10/24/1988 NOTE CHANGE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 7:00 P.M. AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, October 24, 1988 7:00 p.m. - Planning Commission Workshop 7:30 p.m. - Public Hearings COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Julianne Bye, Richard Anderson, Christine Dodge, Doug Fell , Robert Hallett, Charles Ruebling, Ed Schuck STAFF MEMBERS: Chris Enger, Director of Planning; Michael Franzen, Senior Planner; Don Uram, Assistant Planner; Sue Anderson, Recording Secretary Pledge of Allegiance--Roll Call I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA II. MEMBERS REPORTS III. MINUTES IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS *NOTE: THE TIMES LISTED BELOW ARE TENTATIVE, AND MAY BE SIGNIFICANTLY EARLIER, OR LATER, THAN LISTED. (7:00) A. UPDATE OF COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN. (7:30) B. ZACHMAN BROTHERS 1ST ADDITION, by Zachman Development Corporation. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 5 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural and RM-6.5 to R1-9.5 on 5 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of 5 acres into 18 single family lots, 3 outlots , and road right-of- way. Location: The southwest corner of Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard. A public hearing. (8:15) C. TIMBER BLUFFS, by Brown Land Company. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 44.4 acres, Planned Unit Development Review on 44.4 acres with waivers, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-44 on 26.6 acres, Preliminary Plat of 44.4 acres into 14 single family lots and one outlot, Environmental Assessment Worksheet Review for a single family development. Location: South of Riverview Road, north of Minnesota River. A continued public hearing. (9:15) D. PRAIRIE GREEN MINI-STORAGE, by Prairie Green Associates. Request for Site Plan Review within the I-2 Zoning District on 0.69 acres, Preliminary Plat of 7.2 acres into 2 lots for construction of 8,575 square feet of additional storage space. Location: East of County Road #4, South of Terrey Pine Drive. A public hearing. Agenda Monday, October 24, 1988 Page Two (9:35) E. SUTLIFF PROPERTY. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on two lots comprising 0.95 acres. Location: 7070 and 7080 Eden Prairie Road. A public meeting. (9:45) F. WELTER PURGATORY ACRES 5TH ADDITION, by James R. , Hill , Inc. Request for Preliminary Plat of 1.17 acres into 2 single family lots. Location: East of Olympia Drive, north of Bennett Place. A public hearing. (9:55) G. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS, by Wirtanen Clark Larsen Architects , Inc. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Regional Service on 0.968 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of 0.968 acres into one lot for construction of a retail paint store. Location: Along Plaza Drive in front of the Menard' s Center. A public hearing. V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. PLANNER'S REPORT • VIII. ADJOURNMENT *NOTE: THE TIMES LISTED ABOVE ARE TENTATIVE, AND MAY BE SIGNIFICANTLY EARLIER, OR LATER, THAN LISTED. PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED MINUTES MONDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1988 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMISSION MEMBERS : chairperson Julianne Bye, Richard Anderson, Christine Dodge, Doug Fell, Robert Hallett, Charles Ruebling, Ed Schuck STAFF MEMBERS ; Chris Enger, Director of Planning; Michael Franzen, Senior Planner; Scott Kipp, Assistant Planner; Deb Edlund, Recording Secretary PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL; All members present . I ._APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION• Schuck moved, seconded by Fell to approve the Agenda as published . Motion carried 5-0-0 . II . MEMBERS REPORTS I I I ._MINUTES IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. UPDATE OF COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, stated that Barton-Aschman Associates had been commissioned by the City in May 1988 to update the Comprehensive Park and Open Space System Plan, which was a Chapter in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Lambert said that the Comprehensive Park and Open Space Plan had not been updated since 1979 and considered the next 5 years as a critical time for the development of City parks and open spaces . He said after the preliminary draft had been reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council the draft would be updated, forwarded to the Metropolitan Council, and then the final draft would be presented for a Public Hearing before the Planning Commission and the City Council . Lambert introduced Barry Warner, representative from Barton-Aschman Associates, to present the plan. Warner stated that the purpose of the Comprehensive Park and Open Space System Plan was to identify the City's needs for parks and open spaces currently, in the year 1995, and in the year 2000 . He reported that the Planning Commission Minutes 2 October 24, 1988 following processes had been used to complete the study: 1) Population growth study, which indicated a high percentage of young adults with children, 2 ) Population density study, 3 ) Open space map updated, 3) Written inventory prepared for each existing park, 4 ) Needs and demands analysis study, 5) Newspaper survey conducted, 6 ) Four neighborhood meetings held . Warner reported the following conclusions from the study: 1) A broad base community support for the development of parks, • trails, and open spaces was present, 2) Additional land acquisition and facility development should occur, 3 ) Three areas in the City would not have adequate park facilities; southwest area, west central area, and mid- central area, 4 ) Need for additional youth and adult athletic facilities, 5) Further study completed regarding the function of the Community Center, 6 ) Completion of the open space system. Warner said the existing policies regarding parks and open spaces had been reviewed and updated. Warner said the study indicated the need for further study of the Bluff Preservation. Warner discussed the feasibility study completed for the consideration of a golf course . He stated that a strong potential existed for development of a golf course, with three possible sites considered, the best location being west of Flying Cloud Field. Warner said that a considerable amount of land was required for a golf course and a statement needed to be made now for the preservation of the land. Warner presented the following recommendations and priorities : 1) Neighborhood park improvements, 2 ) Outdoor swimming facility, 3 ) Golf course development, 4 ) Trail system development, 5) Land acquisition, 6) Special use facilities developed, 7) Purgatory Creek Recreation area developed, 8 ) Resolution regarding the function of Community Center Facility, 9 ) Miller Park developed with youth facilities developed to compliment the park . Anderson asked Warner what was meant by a resolution regarding the function of the Community Center . Warner replied that because of private development of health clubs, etc . within the community, the City needed to re- analysis the competition from the private sector, the needs which exist within the community, and what facilities should be contained in the Community Center . Anderson asked what the relationship was with Flying Cloud Airport regarding the youth athletics . Lambert replied that an extension of the runway had been suggested; however, he believed that it would be several years before an extension of the runway would take place . Lambert Planning Commission Minutes 3 October 24, 1988 stated that the City's contract with MAC had not been renewed at this time . Anderson asked Warner to elaborate on the resolution of the hockey facilities . Warner replied the hockey demands in relationship to other priorities of the community should be considered and that a statement should be made as to hockey belonging in the Community Center or not. Warner reported that the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission believed that stronger statements needed to be made regarding the Riley Creek development, the function of the Community Center. He said the Commission had suggested an opportunity for a young hunter program, educational opportunities, and trail linkage in the Minnesota River Valley. Warner said the Commission also suggested development of urban treatment for highway right-of-ways to enhance the community's image . Chairperson Bye believed that as a whole the Planning Commission concurred with the findings in the report. Anderson stated that he concurred with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission that the Community Center and hockey issues needed to be more specific. Fell noted that the study called for a small increase in acreage necessary for neighborhood parks and was concerned if this amount of land increase would be sufficient. Lambert replied that there were only 3 to 4 parks left to be built to accomplish the City's goal of a neighborhood park within a 1/2 mile radius of each neighborhood. Lambert emphasized the importance to acquire the land now, especially in the southwest area of the City, before land prices increased further . Fell was concerned about the Minnesota River frontage being lost and believed the City should take advantage of the land. Lambert stated that the Minnesota Valley Wild Life Refuge and Recreation area had a federally approved plan to acquire the Minnesota River floodplain area from Fort Snelling to Jordan. He said that as part of this plan Eden Prairie would be responsible to acquire the floodplain between Riverview Road and the Minnesota Valley. Lambert stated the acquisition of the floodplain would allow the connection of the City's current trail systems to a trail system within the Wild Life Refuge Area. Lambert said the floodplain would be designated as a nature preserve with limited hunting. Schuck believed it was important to have the trail systems connect to neighboring community's trail systems . Planning Commission Minutes 4 October 24, 1988 • Dodge stated that she was impressed with the report and emphasized that land acquisition should be a top priority. Hallett stated that the document had been well done; however, he would have liked to have had more time to respond . Hallett believed the Plan was too important to rush through. Enger suggested having another meeting for further discussion. Lambert said that he did not want the Planning Commission to feel rushed . Ruebling stated that he too would like more time and asked if the Plan had to be approved by the Planning Commission before it could be presented to the City Council . Lambert said that the Plan was scheduled to be presented to the City Council at the November, 15th meeting, which would allow enough time for the Planning Commission to discuss this at the neat meeting. Hallett stated that he would like to see trap and skeet shooting to be discussed for the Minnesota River area . Ruebling stated that he would like more information on indoor hockey and indoor tennis facilities . 'Bye stated that the Planning Commission concurred to review the Plan again at the next scheduled meeting. Bye said that she would like to have comments on how the City planned to incorporate working with and educating the Community. She would like to see included the organization of neighborhood groups, such as crime watch. B. ZACHMAN BROTHERS 1ST ADDITION, by Zachman Development Corporation. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 5 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural and RM-6. 5 to R1-9 . 5 on 5 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of 5 acres into 18 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: The southwest corner of Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard. A public hearing. Bob Smith, Ron Krueger & Associates, presented the proposal . Smith stated that the site was located south of the Eden Prairie Center . Smith stated that the land uses surrounding the proposed site were apartments, condominiums, single-family, and cluster homes . Smith said the proposed site was bordered on two sides by high density residential uses and proposed that the Zachman 1st Addition would provide the necessary transition between the high and low density areas . He said the request was for R1-9 . 5 Zoning District change to include single-family and cluster homes . Smith proposed that R1-9 . 5 single- family homes to be constructed along Preserve Boulevard, a cluster lot on the corner, the existing single-family Planning Commission Minutes 5 October 24, 1988 home, and cluster homer along the back side of the property. Smith said that because Preserve Boulevard was a busy street, he believed that the single-family homes should be placed closer to the interior street, allowing for berming and planted screening to be placed along Preserve Boulevard. Smith noted that a drainage problem currently existed on the property and proposed to created a holding pond to correct the drainage . Frank Zachman stated that the objective of the project was to provide starter hordes ranging from $100, 000 to $130,000 . Zachman said that the property had three negative aspects; 1) high density, 2 ) busy street, and 3 ) high assessment . Zachman believed that R1-13 . 5 would be too costly to build on this property. Zachman believed that by having the cluster homes on the inside of the project- it provided for the most economic solution for the property without sacrificing the appearance of the neighborhood . Enger reported that the one-acre adjacent to Franlo Road was currently zoned for duplexes and the balance of the 4. 75 acres was zoned rural . He said the Comprehensive Guide Plan designated the 4 . 75 acres as low density residential, which was 2 .5 units or less per acre. Enger stated that without a Guide Plan change the property could be developed into 13 to 14 lots, consisting of duplex lots along Franlo Road with the balance of the property at 131500 square foot single-family lots . Enger said that Zachman was recommending a different transition consisting of smaller lot sizes for the single-family homes and developing 18 lots . Enger suggested that one alternative would be to place the court yard lots currently proposed in the southwest portion of the project along Preserve Boulevard, which would allow the higher density portion of the project to be further away from the single-family homes . He noted that this alternative would require a reduction of 3 lots; however, it would conform to the R1- 9 . 5 zoning. Enger suggested that a second alternative would be to replace the 5 single-family lots along Preserve Boulevard with 6 cluster homes and the remaining lots to the west and south remain R1-9 . 5 single-family. Enger reported that a 4-foot grade change would be required over the entire site . He said utilities would be provided from Franlo Road. Enger said that to correct the drainage problem the storm water run-off would be collected within a catch basin system within the cul-de- sac and discharged to a holding pond at the rear of Lots 5 and 6. He said the pedestrian system would include a 5- foot concrete sidewalk along the west side of Preserve Boulevard and an 8-foot bituminous trail along the north side of Franlo Way. Planning commission Minutes 6 October 24, 1988 • Enger stated that the issue of appropriate transition was important and the concurrence of the existing neighbors should be taken into consideration. He said that the lot sizes surrounding the proposed development was 15, 000 square feet, with a minimum existing setback of 50 feet. Enger said that the proposed development lot sizes would average 8,682 square feet with a minimum setback of 20 feet . Enger said that Staff had recommended a neighborhood meeting to discuss the transition issue . Enger commented that this was a close situation and that neighborhood input should be weighed heavily. Enger stated that at this time Staff would recommend a 30-day continuance to allow the proponent time to revise the plans. Jon Luebke, 8733 Grier Lane, stated that he was concerned •regarding a cluster home being built next to a single- family home and suggested the cluster homes be constructed next to the existing duplexes and apartments . Luebke was also concerned about the drainage problem. He strongly recommended that no more than 2 . 5 units per acre be allowed. Luebke said that in the past Zachman had had problems with sub-contractors and asked if the Planning Staff knew who would be the sub-contractor for this project . Enger replied that a preliminary study had been completed by the Engineering Department and that Staff was aware of the drainage problems in the area . Enger commented that he could not address the sub-contractor issue. Stephen Newell, 8692 Grier Lane, asked the Planning Commission to seriously consider the transition issue . Newell said the back of the cluster homes would be facing his property and he was concerned about what type of screening would be provided. Newell requested that the project be denied or the location of the cluster homes changed. Michael Miller, 8669 Kathryn Court, stated that he was in basically in favor of the development; however, was concerned about the number of homes and the location of the homes in the southern portion of the development . Pat Heatherson, 8727 Grier Lane, stated a concern about the property value of the existing homes decreasing if the development proceeded as planned . Heatherson wanted the property to remain low density. She also stated a concern about Zachman's reputation as a contractor . Jim Durda, 8746 Grier Lane, believed the proposed development would be a negative statement for the existing homeowners . Durda was also concerned about Zachman as the developer . Durda believed that the property had good potential for a positive development; however, he did not Planning Commission Minutes 7 October 24, 1988 believe what was currently proposed was an appropriate use of the land. Dean Maltotky, 8687 Kathryn Court, believed that the proposal presented tonight did not provide an appropriate transition. Malotky said he would like to see the cluster homes moved to the northern corner of the development . Jodie Miller, 8669 Kathryn Court, stated that not poll had been taken of the 42 homeowners in the neighborhood and the individuals speaking tonight were stating their own views and not necessarily those of the entire neighborhood. Ron Krueger, Ron Krueger and Associates,, stated that the proponent had tried to design the property in a single- family fashion; however, economically a total single- family development was not possible . Krueger stated that he had worked with Zachman on several successful projects . Anderson stated that it was not the Planning Commission's responsibility to judge the merits or financial condition of the developer . He said the main consideration should be transition and he concurred with Staff 's recommendation that the lots remain R1-13 . 5 and duplexes be constructed . Douglas Grobe, owner of the property, stated that he currently owed the City over $100, 000 in taxes and assessments. Grobe said that if the property was not developed soon and in an economical way, he would lose the property. Hallett asked if the project could be zoned R1-9 . 5 single- family. Hallett was concerned about cluster homes or multiple units being developed; however, he wanted to see the property developed so that the owner could receive a return on his investment. Enger replied that staff did not get into the economics of the development. Enger stated that the alternative suggested by staff was to zone the property R1-9 . 5, move the cluster homes along Preserve Boulevard (two sets of three clusters) , and the balance of the property would be single-family. Hallett said he would be more willing to support that proposal rather than the one currently presented by the proponent. Ruebling stated that existing homeowners had purchased their properties with the understanding that the surrounding property was zoned R1-13 . 5 and believed that the Commission had an obligation to consider a change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan very carefully. Ruebling believed the only rationale for the change indicated thus far was related to the busy traffic on Preserve Boulevard . Ruebling believed that the lots abutting the existing Planning commission Minutes 8 October 24, 1988 homes should be of similar character and adequate setbacks maintained. MOTION 1: Anderson moved, seconded by Ruebling to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0-0. MOTION 2 • Anderson moved, seconded by Ruebling to continue the public hearing for 30 days pending redesign of the development plan as discussed at the Planning commission meeting of October 24, 1988. Ruebling commented that if the access to the development came from Franlo Road rather than from Preserve Boulevard additional land would be available for developing. Dodge commented that several alternative layouts for the property could be considered. Smith stated that the landscaping and the color selection would be designated by the Homeowners ' Association. Smith said that a heavy buffer of pines and shrubs would be • planted along Preserve Boulevard, additional planting would be done at the time of construction for each individual home, and trees planted throughout the development by Zachman Builders . He commented that maintenance of the vegetation, snow removal, and lawn care would be the responsibility of the Homeowners ' Association, if the project proceeded as a cluster lot development. Smith stated that additional grading was being done to promote improved surface drainage . He said that if the property was raised to the level suggested, the trunk intersect would be too high to handle the run-off. Smith stated that the traffic pattern had been suggested by Staff . He said that only two homes would be negatively impacted by setbacks and there were seven lots which backed up to seven lots . Anderson suggested that in the interim another neighborhood meeting be held. Smith asked if the Planning Commission would consider a 15 day continuance . Bye replied that it had been the experience of the Planning Commission that 15 days was not adequate time to resolve the issues. Bye concluded by stating that the proponent should revise the plan to consider smaller lots, the number of lots Planning Commission Minutes 9 October 24, 1988 should be 18 to 15, the smaller lots should run along Preserve Boulevard, the larger lots should abut the existing homes in a fashion where the lots were in alignment with one another, and that the possibility of a cul-de-sac be considered. Smith asked if the Planning Commission would be opposed to the cluster homes along Preserve Boulevard . Bye said that could be a possibility. Motion carried 7-0-0 . Hallett emphasized the need for the developer to meet with the neighbors again before returning to the Planning Commission. C. TIMBER BLUFF, by By-own Laud Company. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 44 . 4 acres, Planned Unit Development Review on 44 . 4 acres with waivers, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-44 on 26 . 6 acres, Preliminary Plat of 44 . 4 acres into 14 single family lots and one outlot, Environmental Assessment Worksheet Review for a single family development . Location: South of Riverview Road, north of Minnesota River . A continued public hearing. iMike Gair, representing the proponent, gave a slide presentation of the project, which would create a prestigious development of 14 single-family homes . Gair said that Staff had indicated a concern about the view of the horizon. Gair presented a series of slides to demonstrate the view would not be obstructed . Gair stated that based on a 1982 survey, two Indian burial grounds existed on the property. Gair said that the Minnesota Historical Society had been conducted a study and would advise the proponent of appropriate preservation measures if any were required. Gair stated that a complete tree inventory had been completed. Gair said that a request was being made to zone the four interior lots as R1-22 with the remainder of the property to be zoned R1-44 . He said that the building pad sizes for lots 1 through 7 would be 1201x100 ' to accommodate the largest of the homes. Gair said the four interior lots would have building pads approximately 961x801 . Gair stated that the request was to plat Outlot A for a private road and plat Outlot B for private recreation use. Gair said that the private road was to provide the homeowners with privacy and seclusion. • Enger reported the request was for 14 single-family lots on or above the bluff rim, with an Outlot down to the Minnesota River floodplain, with the proposed use not. Planning Commission Minutes 10 October 24, 1988 idesignated at this time . Enger said the R1-44 designation was consistent with the City's intended purpose . Enger commented this was the first time this zoning had been used since its adoption in 1982 . The: R1-22 zoning was limited to the four interior lots. Enger stated that the proponent had requested a private road, which was not allowed per City Code; however, the proponent had applied for a variance . Enger stated the reasons for the private road were; 1) it would allow the larger building pads, which were necessary to reduce the impact to the bluff (a 50 ' right-of-way would not be necessary, allowing the homes to be built further north, away from the bluff ) , 2 ) the proponent was proposing a specially treated road (treated concrete brick) , and 3) the proponent wished to secure the area by utilizing a private gate . Enger said the request for a private road should be considered Judiciously, because in general, lots should be on public road to always assure access and not be dependent on private convenants . Enger noted that to extend the road to the east was precluded by an existing home and to extend the road to the west was not desirable due to the topography of the area . Enger said that after considering all the factors, Staff would recommend a private road. • Enger stated a scenic easement was being requested by the City to preserve the vegetation along the bluff . Enger said the develop had requested the scenic easement be worded in such a manner to allow the homeowners to maintain the natural prairie if they so desired. Enger stated the Indian mounds were not visibly apparent on the property; however, because of historical documentation of their existence, a release from the Minnesota Historical Society would be required. Enger stated the tree replacement was calculated on the worst case scenario; however, the proponent would be give credit as the homes were constructed and if additional trees were saved. Enger concluded by stating that Staff recommended approval of the project based on the 14 recommendations outlined in the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988 . Ruebling asked how the fire and police departments would be able to gain access to the properties if necessary. Enger replied the Public Safety Department had assured Staff that access could be obtained; however, the final details had not been worked out at this time . Ruebling asked Enger if the proposal would be consistent with the land acquisition proposed along the Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes 11 October 24, 1988 • River as outlined by the Park, Recreation and Natural Resources Staff. Enger replied that the Park, Recreation and Natural Resources Staff had requested a 150 ' outlot which would allow the opportunity for a trial corridor and although the City was not in a position at this time to acquire the entire floodplain area, the developer had proposed to leave that portion of the land undeveloped to allow the City to work with the property owner at a latter date to acquire the floodplain. Ruebling asked if the floodplain area would be privately owned or owned by the Homeowners ' Association. Brown replied that it was privately owned currently and a determination had not been made at this time if the land would be park land or turned over to the Homeowners ' Association. Fell asked if Outlot B could be developed as a subdivision. Enger replied that the area could be developed as a recreation area; however, restrictions placed on the property would not allow for any substantial encroachment into the floodplain. Enger commented that if the City wished to acquire the floodplain it should begin immediately to make provisions to do so. Dodge noted that the Staff report indicated that four lots would require pumps which were to be maintained by the homeowners and asked Enger who would be responsible if damage occurred from the pumps malfunctioning. Enger replied that he was not sure; however, in the past the property owner was responsible . Dodge suggested that this be clarified by the Engineering Department. Hallett asked Enger if the Park, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission had reviewed the proposal . Enger replied no; however, the Park, Recreation & Natural Resources Staff had worked with the Planning Department in the formulation of the Plan and concurred with the recommendations . Hallett commented that he would like to hear the Park, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission 's comments . Ruebling believed the proposal was outstanding. Schuck commented that an old trail existed in this area which went to Fort Snelling, it was an old stagecoach trail from St . Peter to Shakopee . Brown stated that the trail existed in the outlot portion of the project and that potential existed to restore the trail if the City desired. By requested that the historical information regarding the trail be presented to the Park, Recreation Natural Resources Department. Fell asked Enger what the status was for Riverview Road . Enger replied the feasibility study had not been completed at this time. Planning commission Minutes 12 October 24, 1988 • Fell asked Enger if the City would have any control over the development of the private recreation area as to its river access . Enger replied the DNR would have control . Fell asked Enger if fences could be built around the recreation area. Enger replied yes . Fell stated that even though he believed this to be a great development he was concerned about the access to the Minnesota River being blocked from the City. Enger replied that access to the Minnesota Rivers across this property was not recommended. Enger said that the Park, Recreation & Natural Resources Department was looking at access further west of this development. Hallett asked Enger if there would only be one public access to the Minnesota River for Eden Prairie. Enger replied there were possibly three points of access to the river . Hallett stated that three locations were proposed on the map; however, how positive was the City that actual development of those accesses would be possible when the City wanted to proceed . Hallett believed that access and adequate parking at the accesses was important. Fell believed the assurance of walking access needed to be addressed now. He was concerned that as more houses were developed the residents of those homes would try to block • the development of a trail . Fell emphasized that precautions needed to be taken now. Hallett concurred with Fell and believed that the last thing the residents of these 14 homes would want was for the public to be able to walk along the front of their properties and believed that a guarantee needed to be made to the City that walking access would be available . Enger stated that approximately 2000 acres of the Minnesota River floodplain would be part of a wildlife refuge which would help to preserve access to the river for the public. Bye concluded that the Planning Commission wished to go on record that even though the accesses and trails had been defined by the Comprehensive Guide Plan, the need• to actually acquire the land to secure these items for the City was vital . Commissionmember Anderson had left the meeting. MOTION 1` Dodge moved, seconded by Fell to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. • Planning Commission Minutes 13 October 24, 1988 . MOTION Dodge moved, seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Brown Land Company for Planned Unit Development Concept on 44 . 4 acres for Timber Bluffs, based on revised plans dated October 20, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988 . Motion carrier_ 6-0-0. MOTION 3 • Dodge moved, seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Brown Land company for Planned Unit Development District Review on 44 . 4 acres, with waivers, and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1- 44 on 26. 6 acres for Timber Bluffs, based on revised plans dated October 20, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988 . Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 4 : Dodge moved, seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Brown Land Company for Preliminary Plat of 44 .4 acres into 14 single family lots . and one outlot for Timber Bluffs, based on revived plans dated October 20, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988. Motion carried 6-0-0 . MOTION 5• Dodge moved, seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council a finding of no significant impact for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Timber Bluffs, based on plans dated October 20, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988 . Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION• Fell moved, seconded by Hallett to recommend to the City Council and the Park, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to review the Minnesota River public access and trail systems and acquisition of those trails prior to any additional development along the Minnesota River . Motion carried 6-0-0. D. PRAIRIE GREEN MINI-STORAGE, by Prairie Green Associates . Request for Site Plan Review within the I-2 Zoning District on 0. 69 acres, Preliminary Plat of 7. 2 acres into • 2 lots for construction of 8, 575 square feet of additional :storage space. Location: East of County Road 44, South of Terrey Pine Drive . A public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes 14 October 24, 1988 • Brian Klutz, presented that proposed plan for the proponent. Klutz stated that the request was to construct four additional mini-.storage buildings to the current facility. He said the proponent had been working closely with Staff and concurred with the staff recommendations . Kipp reported that Staff recommended approval of the plan as outlined in the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988 . Kipp noted the approval was only for the 4 additional buildings and any development of the property to the north would require review by the Planning Commission and City Council. MOTION 1: Fell moved, seconded by Schuck to close the public bearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2• Fell moved, seconded by Schuck to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Prairie Green Associates for Site Plan Review within the I-2 Zoning District on 0 . 69 acres for expansion of the Prairie Green Mini-Storage, based on plans dated October 7, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988 . Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 3: Fell moved, seconded by Schuck to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Prairie Green Associated for Preliminary Plat of 7 . 2 acres into two lots for construction of an 8, 575 sq. ft . addition to the Prairie Green Mini-Storage use, based on plans dated October 7, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988. Motion carried 6-0- 0 . E. SUTLIFF PROPERTY. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13 . 5 on two lots comprising 0 .95 acres . Location: 7070 and 7080 Eden Prairie Road . A public meeting. Enger reported that the Zoning District change was being initiated by the City after being informed the properties were currently zoned Rural and the two homes were in a non-conforming status . Enger stated that Staff recommended a District Zone change to R1-13. 5, which would be consistent with the surrounding properties to the north, west, and south. Enger noted that a condition of • the zoning change would be that the property located at 7080 Eden Prairie Road connect to City sewer and water when the current systems failed. Planning Commission Minutes 15 October 24, 1988 . MOTION: Dodge moved, seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13 . 5 for two lots totaling 0 .95 acre, based on the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988 . Motion carried 6-0-0 . F. WELTER PtRGATORY, ACRES 5TH ,ADDITION, by James R. Hill, Inc:. Request for Preliminary Plat of 1 .17 acres into 2 single family lots . Location: East of Olympia Drive, north of Bennett Place . A public hearing. Kipp reported the request was to combine three lots into two lots to accommodate larger homes . Kipp' stated the lot sizes would be consistent with surrounding lots . Kipp tinted it would be necessary to vacate the drainage and utility easements from the previously platted lots . MOTION 1: Dodge moved, seconded by Fell to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0 . MOTION 2: • Dodge moved, seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of James R. Hill, Inc . , for Preliminary Plat of 1.17 acres into two single family lots, based on plans dated September 23, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988 . Motion carried 6-0-0. G. SHERWIN_-WILLIAMS, by Wirtanen Clark Larsen Architects, Inc. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to C- Regional Service on 0 .968 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of 0 ,968 acres into one lot for construction of a retail paint store. Location: Along Plaza Drive in front of the Menard 's Center . A public hearing. David Clark, presented the proposal for the proponent. Clark stated that the proponent would like to use the shared access with Menards as originally proposed . Clark believed that visibility would not be obstructed with the required setbacks . Clark said that engineering back-up could be provided to Staff to support the request. Clark stated that Sherwin Williams stores did not normally utilize a canopy as suggested by Staff; however, if forced to comply it would do so. Clark said that landscaping • would be limited with a canopy. He said the berm would match that of Menards . Planning commission Minutes 16 October 24, 1988 • Clark stated that the proponent would work with Staff to comply with the Sign Ordinance and suggested building elevations . Clark commented that Sherwin Williams was a national retailer which had standard colors used for its buildings. He asked the Planning Commission to consider allowing the use of the national standards . The Sherwin Williams representative, stated that Sherwin Williams would be flexible . He said the national standard colors were a light sandy brown brick with a brown facia . Enger reported that obvious discrepancies existed between Sherwin Williams and the Staff Report dated October 21, 1989 . Enger believed that the national proto-type building was not designed for a corner lot. Enger said the wrapping of a canopy around the east side of the building had been an attempt to enhance the appearance of the building. He said the building would be visible from Highway 5. Enger stated the signage on the canopy would not be within the guidelines of the City Sign Ordinance . He said the access would be located at the sharpest point on the curve . Enger stated that a sight distance currently existed with the Menard access and the suggested access by Sherwin Williams would have further sight obstruction because of the required screening for the • parking area . Enger believed that adequate access could be provided without having the access on the curve . Enger noted that trees under the canopy were not part of the landscaping plan provided by Sherwin Willimas . Enger concluded that the proposal was "OK", but the Staff recommendations still stand. Bye noted that the memo from Staff indicated the need for an additional parking space, but it was not listed in the Staff recommendations . Enger replied that it should be listed as recommendation 1.F. Schuck recommended that Sherwin Williams do whatever was possible to improve the appearance of the building. The Sherwin Williams representative stated that the building was a retail store, which required a rear access for loading and unloading merchandise. He believed the building had a handsome and well built appearance. He added that he would continue to work with Staff to improve the appearance of the building. MOTION 1• Dodge moved, seconded by Schuck to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. Planning Commission Minutes 17 October 24, 1988 • MOTION 2; Dodge moved, seconded by Schuck to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Wirtanen Clark Larsen Architects, Inc. , for Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Regional-Service on 0 .968 acres, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, for construction of a Sherwin-Williams retail paint store, based on plans dated October 17, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988, with the addition of Item 1 .F, Revise plans to include an additional parking space, for a total of 56 parking spaces . Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 3• Dodge moved, seconded by Schuck to the City council approval of the request of Wirtanen Clark Larsen Architects, Inc. , for Preliminary Plat of 0 .968 acre into one lot for construction of a retail paint store for Sherwin Williams, based on plans dated October 17, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 21, 1988, with the addition of Item 1.F, Revise plans to include an additional parking space, for a total of 56 parking spaces . Motion carried 6-0-0 . • V. OLD BUSINESS VI . NEW BUSINESS VII . PLANNER' S REPORT It was suggested that a special workshop for November 7, 1988 at 7PM be scheduled to discuss the Comprehensive Park and Open Space Plan. VIII . ADJOURNMENT Schuck moved, seconded by Fell to adjourn at 10 :30 PM. Motion carried 6-0-0 . •