Planning Commission - 04/26/1993 i
AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, April 26, 1993
7:30 p.m.
CONEMSSION MEMBERS: Tim Bauer, Kenneth E. Clinton, Cynthia Clish,
Katherine Kardell, Douglas Sandstad, Edward
Schlampp, Mary Jane Wissner
STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE: Lisa-Marie Gualtieri
STAFF MEMBERS: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development;
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner; Donald Uram,
Planner; Deb Edlund, Recording Secretary
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
III. MINUTES
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
To be continued to the May 10, 1993 Meeting:
A. ST. EDWARD'S FIELD by The Pemtom Land Company. Request for rezoning
from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.44 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.04 acres into 12
lots, 1 outlot and road right-of-way. Location: West of Tartan Curve, east of
CSAH 101.
B. VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH by Victory Lutheran Church. Request for
Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 6.6 acres.
Location: East of County Road 4, north of Berger Drive.
Continued Item from 4-12-93:
C. SOWLES PROPERTY by US Homes. Request for Planned Unit Development
Concept Review of 83.55 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on
12.06 acres, Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential
to Medium Density Residential on 12.06 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5
on 50.92 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 12.06 acres and Preliminary
Plat of 83.55 acres into 233 lots. Location: East of Dell Road, north of County
Road 1.
D. FAIRFIELD WEST PHASE 2 by Centex Homes. Request Planned Unit
Development Concept Review on 23.5 acres, Planned Unit Development District
Review on 23.5 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 6.34 acres and
Preliminary Plat of 6.34 acres into 11 single family lots and road right-of-way.
Location: West of Hennepin County Light Rail Authority Right-of-Way, South
of future Scenic Heights Road Extension.
E. EDEN PRAHUE FORD- CAR STORAGE by Eden Prairie Ford. Request for
Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 4.5 acres
and Site Plan Review on 4.5 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of
Adjustments and Appeals. Location: South of Valley View Road, between
Prairie Center Drive and Plaza Drive.
V. MEMBERS' REPORTS
VI. CONTINUING BUSINESS - Election of Officers
VII. NEW BUSINESS
VM. PLANNERS' REPORTS
IX. ADJOURNMENT
•
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVED MINUTES
MONDAY, MAY 1% 1993 7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Tim Bauer,Ken Clinton, Cynthia Clish Katherine Kardell, Doug Sandstad,
Edward Schlampp, Mary Jane Wissner.
STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE: Lisa-Marie Gualtieri
STAFF MEMBERS: Mike Franzen, Senior Planner; Deb Edlund, Recording Secretary
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL
All members present.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION:
Clinton moved, seconded by Kardell to approve the Agenda as published. Motion carried 7-0-0.
M. MINUTES
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. EDEN PRAIRIE FORD-CAR STORAGE by Eden Prairie Ford. Request for Zoning District
Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 4.8 acres and Site Plan Review on 4.8
acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Location: South
of Valley View Road, between Prairie Center Drive and Plaza Drive.
Franzen reported that since the last meeting the Developer was reviewing the Planning
Commission's comments and is making plan changes.
MOTION 1:
Kardell moved, seconded by Clinton to continue the public hearing to May 24, 1993. Motion
carried 7-0-0.
B. ST.EDWARD'S FIELD by Pemtom Land Company. Request for rezoning from Rural to Rl-
13.5 on 2.44 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.07 acres into 11 lots, 1 outlot and road right-of-
way. Location: West of Tartan Curve, east of CSAH 101.
• Dan Herbst, representing the proponent, replied that 3 lots were previously approved for multiple
housing and 10 lots platted for single family. The current plan would have larger single family
lots with only 9 lots proposed. Herbst requested a 5 foot variance on Lot 4 to avoid
encroachment into the creek area. The outlot would be dedicated to the City.
Schlampp asked the depth of the sump between lot 4 and 5. Herbst replied 6 feet. Schlampp
asked if the Watershed District had staked out the site. Herbst replied that a biologist had visited
the property. He added typically the Watershed District did not want to act until the plan was
reviewed by the City Council. Schlampp stated that it appeared that the drainage would go into
the sump. Herbst stated that the drainage would be directed to the West.
Franzen reported that the zoning was in place prior to the current Shoreland Ordinance being in
place. This plan could have been built if previously approved. The 44 foot street and the
variance request were recommended to keep the distance from the creek. The plan is consistent
with adjacent property and with what was originally approved.
Sandstad asked if the narrow street was being recommended because of the small number of
houses. Franzen replied this the narrow street had been recommended before where the density
was low. Franzen added that there were not a large number of lots which front on the street.
Schlampp asked if the radius of the cul-de-sac would be acceptable. Franzen replied that the
paved surface would be the same as a normal street.
Clinton asked if the building pads would be 50 feet deep. Franzen replied that the area needed
to do the construction would be 50 feet. Clinton asked if St. Andrews Court could accommodate
a school bus. Franzen replied that the school bus would not go into the cul-de-sac; the children
would probably be picked up on Tartan Drive.
Wilma Eisenman, 6890 Tartan Curve, stated that her property was only 18 feet from the
roadway. Eisenman asked if there was anything that could be done to preserve the few
significant trees on their property and if there was any ordinance which required the planting of
trees.
Franzen asked the developer if the grading would be to fill or cut in this area. Dwight Jelly
replied that this would be a fill situation. Franzen believed that the trees could be protected.
He added that the developer would need to field survey the area around the tree.
Eisenman stated that she would appreciate anything that could be done to save the trees.
Eisenman noted that in the letter she received on April 12, 1993 it stated that no variances were
to be requested. Herpst replied that the plan had been changed since that time because of the
wetland. Eisenman asked why their homes were built so close to the road right-of-way. Franzen
replied that he did not have an exact answer. He added that the current requirement was 30 feet
from each street for a comer lot.
. Schlampp asked if the home to the south of Eisenman was the same distance from the street.
Eisenman replied yes.
Dennis Bergmann, 6850 Tartan Curve, asked if a berm could be placed so that the drainage
would flow away from the existing homes. Bergmann noted that when another development was
constructed water problems had started to occur. Franzen replied that the area between the back
of the existing homes could be walked to determine how the water drainage flows and then
determine the correct drainage solution.
Schlampp noted that there was a lot of water running to the north and questioned if the drainage
could be tied into the storm water drainage in lieu of going across the property. Schlampp
believed that the situation could be worse across from Lot 1 and 8. Franzen replied that a swale
could be created or the adjacent storm drainage could be used. Franzen added that the neighbors
could participate in the determination of a solution.
Eugene Spanda, 18960 Lotus View Drive, asked if the trees to the south be affected. Herpst
replied that the grade would be lowered. He added that the trees on the Spanda property would
not be affected. Spanda said that he wanted to keep the trees for the privacy.
Bauer asked for clarification on how the 44 foot right-of-way on Tartan Court occurred. Bauer
also asked if the tree within the right-of-way would be affected. Franzen did not believe that
all of the trees were on the right-of-way. Franzen added that he would need to investigate
further the right-of-way distance issue. Katherine Lunzer, from the audience, stated that in 1976
they had placed on record with the City that road would developed in the future in this area.
Bauer believed that the property and plat existed before the existing home was constructed;
therefore, he was comfortable with approval with the condition for further tree preservation and
drainage protection for the existing homes.
MOTION 1:
Bauer moved, seconded by Wissner to close the public hearing.
Clish asked if it would be difficult to find out about the setback issues. Franzen replied that he
would investigate and bring the findings back to the Planning Commission.
Motion carried 7-0-0.
MOTION 2:
Bauer moved, seconded by Wissner to recommend to the City Council approval of the request
of St. Edward's Field for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.44 acres based on plans dated
April 7, 1993 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 7, 1993
including additions: E. Tree preservation on the Eisenman and Spanda properties. F. Drainage
protection for Lot 1 & 8. Motion carried 7-0-0.
MOTION 3:
• Bauer moved, seconded by Wissner to recommend to the City Council approval of the request
of St. Edward's Field for Preliminary Plat of 7.01 acres into 11 lots, 1 outlot and road right-of-
way based on plans dated April 7, 1993 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated April 7, 1993 including additions: E. Tree preservation on the Eisenman and Spanda
properties. F. Drainage protection for Lot 1 & 8. Motion carried 7-0-0.
C. CENTEX DEERFIELD by Centex Homes/Delegards. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 21.8 acres and from
Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial on 3.66 acres. Planned Unit
Development Concept Review on 94.15 acrs. PUD District Review with waivers on 94.15
acres. Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 on 30.1 acres from Rural to RM-6.5 on 21.8 acres, from
Rural to R1-13.5 on 7.3 acres and from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 3.66 acres.
Preliminary Plat on 94.15 acres in 326 lots, 7 outlots and road right-of-way. Location: Dell
Road, and West 82nd Street.
Franzen reported that Staff had always expected uses other than low density residential. He
added that 3.5 units per acre was at the low end of medium density which allows up to 10
units/acre. The commercial area is small with a low Base Area Ratio. Some site plan changes
would still be need regarding transition and tree impact.
Dan Blake, representing Centex Homes, stated that this proposal was joint development between
Centex and the Delegards. Centex will purchase some of the Jacques and Delegard property.
Notices of the proposed plan were mailed out to property owners to the north and the developer
had also spoken with builders adjacent to the site. Blake stated that 89 acres would be residential
. development. The plan was to work around the proposed location of Dell Road at this time.
The property was flat to the east and more rolling to the west. Six wetlands were located
throughout the site. The trees on the site were close to the homestead and along Mitchell Lake
with an additional narrow corridor down the center of the property. The proposal was for 15
R1-13.5 lots and 79 single family homes. The southeast area would be developed Multi-family.
The multi-family homes would be the same design as developed in the Carmody Development.
There would be 232 townhome units all of which would be 8, 10, or 12 units per building. A
private loop road would be proposed for the multi-family housing area. Staff had requested a
28 foot road be developed in lieu of a 24 foot road. Blake believed that a narrower road would
discourage on-street parking. He added that extra guest parking areas would be provided also
to discourage on-street parking. Blake noted that a wider road would require the buildings to
be closer to the wetland areas. Centex was planning a park dedication in lieu of park fees. The
park dedication would be approximately 10.5 acres in the southwest area of the property. Blake
believed that there would be an opportunity for the City to purchase additional property for a
park once Highway 212 was built. Another 4.3 acres along Dell Road would be dedicated for
park. A trail corridor proposed through the property to get to Miller Park.
Sandstad asked how residents would cross Dell Road safely to get to the park. Blake replied that
he did not know at this time. Blake also noted that a statement had been made that Centex
would be grading and constructing the trail system; however, it was Centex's intention to work
with the City but not to be responsible for construction of the entire trail system.
Blake reported that the project would be done in phases. Utilities were readily available. The
tree loss was estimated at approximately 35%. Blake believed that the majority of trees in the
narrow corridor in the center of the property could be saved.
Sandstad asked the price range of the carriage homes. Tom Boise, representing Centex, replied
that some units would start at approximately $60,000 and go on up to approximately $100,000.
Kardell asked where the custom homes would be located. Blake replied the custom homes would
be in the R1-13.5 zoning area.
Bob Smith, representing the Delegards, reported that the request was for a change from
residential to neighborhood commercial. The commercial area would be approximately 3.66
acres. A gas/convenience station would be located right on the MWCC line. The northend of
the commercial site would be a retail food facility and a small retail business would be located
on the eastern portion. The commercial building would be the same size or smaller than the
multi-home buildings. Smith stated that the proponent had requested access from Dell Road to
the site. The green space between the commercial and multi-housing area to the east would be
approximately 100 feet. An 8 foot berm with 12 foot trees would be proposed to the east
providing an immediate 20 foot buffer. A NX.R.P. pond would be located in the northwest and
northeast corners. Smith proposed to make a better transition to move the gas/convenience to
the west, move the retail building further south, and have the NX.R.P. pond enlarged in the
northeast corner. This design would allow for the elimination of the pond in the northwest
corner to allow for additional berming.
• Sandstad asked why Commissioner had not seen any plans for the commercial area. Smith
replied that he thought that the Commission had plans for review. Franzen indicated that he was
responsible for plans not being available.
Bauer stated that the Commission had not seen commercial plans in the packet so it was difficult
to respond to changes presented this evening. Smith replied that this could be continued for 2
weeks to allow for revisions of the plan. Bauer believed that the Commission should let the
developer know if it was in favor of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change.
Clinton asked if this commercial area would be similar to the one located on County Road 62
and Shady Oak Road. Smith replied that it would be similar. Smith added that the restaurant
would be a short-term sit down facility with approximately 500 trips during peak hours. The
retail space would result in 45 trips. The gas station would have 3 islands with 9 pumps;
generating approximately 54 trips during peak evening hours. Franzen noted that the traffic
generation figures were based on the type of stores and the number of stores.
Schlampp asked where the NX.R.P. ponds would drain. Smith replied that they would go to
the north. Blake added that the designated open space could be developed as a ponding area.
Schlampp believed that the constraints would be different if a pond were developed. Blake
replied that a complete grading plan had been provided.
Smith believed that berming and transition were important on the north and eastern ends of the
property.
Sandstad asked if the roof would be flat. Smith replied that a pitch roof would be used to blend
in with the residential area.
Smith recommended that there only be a right-in access from Dell Road.
Schlampp asked if the commercial facilities would be designed to service the residential units in
this area only. Smith replied that the facilities would serve mostly the neighborhood but,because
of the location of the major roads it could serve a broader population.
Bauer believed that the final plan needed to address internal circulation; traffic would need to
be directed. Smith replied that the major circulation was a "T" design.
Wissner asked if there would be curbing. Smith replied yes.
Sandstad asked where the trucks would drop off material. Smith replied that most of the
businesses would not be using large semi-trucks for delivery and that they would use the front
door for unloading.
Schlampp asked if the trash facilities would be internal. Smith replied yes.
Sandstad asked if Staff had looked at the loading issue. Franzen replied that single doors would
be used for loading. Smith added that there would be no loading docks.
Clish asked if this was truly the right location for this type of commercial development. Franzen
replied that regional commercial areas were designated in advance and are appropriate near the
Eden Prairie Mall, but neighborhood commercial areas are not. They are approved based on
need, traffic, and transition. The Commission needs to look at how a commercial development
will fit in with what is there now and if there is a good reason for neighborhood commercial
development on this site. Clish asked if the narrower street needed to be dealt with this evening.
Franzen replied that a narrower road would need to be posted as a fire lane.
Wissner asked if cars could be given tickets for parking on the street on a private road. Franzen
replied that a fire lane could be enforced.
Franzen reported that if no changes were made the mix of uses would be good. A transition had
been provided and the commercial portion would be located at the interchange. Franzen noted
that the Commission needed to give general direction as to if the Commission was comfortable
with multiple housing and commercial. Franzen stated that based on the presentations by Smith
and Blake the plan could be massaged to deal with the Staff recommendations.
Bauer stated that he was in favor of the plan. He believed that the compelling reasons for a
Guide Plan Change would be Highway 212 and providing affordable housing.
Kardell stated that she would like to see more detail on the tree loss. Kardell supported the
concept of transition.
• Clinton supported the Guide Plan change. Clinton believed that projects were not being looked
at globally but rather project by project and was concerned about what the total impact to this
area would be.
Bauer concurred with Clinton that the Commission should be looking at the whole picture.
Bauer noted that several plans being reviewed within the last few weeks involved Dell Road.
Clinton said that the Southwest Study may have been acceptable at one time, but now plans are
coming in which are closer to reality.
The Commission asked to see an overall plan of this area in the near future to see the "big
picture".
Blake asked that this item be published for the City Council as originally scheduled in 30 days
if a continuance were approved.
MOTION 1:
Clish moved, seconded by Bauer to continue this item to the May 24th meeting of the Planning
Commission and to publish to the City Council as originally scheduled. Motion carried 7-0-0.
D. CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL PHASE U by the Independent School District#272. Request
for Zoning District Amendment within the Public, R1-22 and I-2 Zoning Districts on 20.5 acres
to allow for the construction of replacement athletic facilities and Site Plan Review on 20.5 acres
for review of grading and drainage plans for the outdoor recreational area. Location: Scenic
Heights Road.
Franzen reported that the last time the Commission saw this plan it was a general plan and now
the District was back to update the Commission on their progress.
Mark Kogler, representing the proponent, stated that the District was requesting a concept
approval only and not final approval. The School District was dealing with MnDot on
acquisition of property and would not begin construction until the 1994 season. The plan was
for a new track, two ball fields, eight tennis courts, and a soccer field. Kogler said that eight
tennis courts were required to accommodate a full size gym class.
Sandstad asked if buildings would be demolished. Kogler replied that three buildings would be
removed. Sandstad asked what the proposed width for Highway 212 corridor was in this area.
Franzen replied approximately 180 to 200 feet. Kogler replied that there were still a number of
issues to be worked out between the School District and MnDot. Kogler added that an interim
drainage plan would need to be dealt with along Highway 212 because the ball fields will be
constructed approximately two years before Highway 212 would be constructed. Sandstad asked
if the bill for the funding of Highway 212 affect the schools plans. Kogler replied no.
• Kardell asked if tennis courts were not lost at another school and this was also why eight courts
were needed at this location. Hamilton replied that two courts were lost at Prairie View.
• Franzen reported that the School District would be moving forward with final plans. He added
that the interim drainage plan needed to be dealt with before the plan could progress further.
Sandstad asked if tree loss would be reviewed in more detail once the final drainage plan was
in place. Franzen replied yes.
MOTION 1:
Kardell moved, seconded by Bauer to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0-0.
MOTION 2:
Kardell moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request
of Independent School District #272 for Zoning District Amendment within the Public, R1-22
and I-2 Zoning Districts on 20.5 acres based on plans dated May 7, 1993 and subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 7, 1993. Motion carried 7-0-0.
MOTION 3:
Kardell moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request
of Independent School District #272 for Site Plan Review on 20.5 acres based on plans dated
May 7, 1993 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 7, 1993.
• Motion carried 7-0-0.
E. EDEN PRAIRIE TRANSPORTATION FACILITY by Independent School District #272.
Request for Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 8.31 acres and Site
Plan Review on 8.31 acres for construction of a 40,000 square foot garage. Location:
Technology Drive and Wallace Road.
Steve Thompson, representing the proponent, presented the plans for the relocation of the bus
transportation facility. Wallace Road would be cut off with Phase III of the plan when adding
the media center. The east side of the building would be the location for handling the loading
and unloading of the busses. The site is approximately 8.3 acres. The drainage would flow
mainly to the north. Extensive grading would be required on the site. Thompson noted that
development of the project would be linked to the development of Technology Drive which was
scheduled to take place in July 1993. Two primary access points were planned. Parking spaces
for 140 employees would be provided. Thompson noted that the staff consisted of 95 employees
at this time. A stacking area for up to 30 buses would also be provided. Eight bay within the
facility would be provided for maintenance. Thompson stated that the storage area for the buses
was lower in elevation and would be well screened. He noted that two residential homes were
12 feet higher than this site and they could still see portions of the site. Thompson noted that
Technology Drive was at a higher elevation close to the entrance and, therefore, larger screening
material would be used at the entrance area. Thompson stated that MnDot would be requested
to provide the drainage for the site.
Sandstad asked if any water would be retained on the site. Thompson replied no. Franzen
replied that the water would be pretreated before and after development out in MnDOT right-of-
way-
Hamilton concurred with Staff on the berming and planting for the southeast corner but,believed
that the requirement for a 6 foot wooden fence on top of the berm was over kill.
Clinton asked what type of plant material would be used to screen the residential area.
Thompson replied conifers would be used; mainly spruce.
Franzen reported that in addition to plant material along Technology Drive a 4 foot wooden
fence would be used for screening. He added that if a berm were not possible that only a fence
could be used. Franzen stated that he had not heard any comments from the residents with
homes which were 12 feet above the proposed site. The screening will need to cover at least
75% in this area. The berming and fencing would screen the buses and fueling area. Franzen
recommended approval as proposed.
Wally Hilgren, stated that the plan that he had seen showed very little screening in the fueling
area. He did not believe that it made sense to screen everywhere else and leave the fueling area
open.
Schlampp asked Hilgren if he would favor trees over a fence. Hilgren replied that he would
prefer trees but believed that there was only room for a fence.
Franzen stated that screening of the view from one industrial area to another is not required by
City Code.
Sandstad said that it appeared that there was at least 75 to 80 feet from the lot lines.
Wissner asked Hilgren if he had windows in his facility which faced the bus fueling area.
Hilgren replied in Phase H of his plan his facility would look directly at this site. Wissner asked
Thompson what the exterior of the building would look like. Thompson replied that the fueling
area was screened and the building would be a masonry exterior.
Schlampp stated that at times noise was more of a factor in these situations and believed that a
wooden fence would help more to screen the noise. Hilgren believed that trees would not work
in this area any way because it is too narrow. Schlampp asked how many buses there would be
at this facility. Thompson replied approximately 78 to begin with and a total of 90 when fully
developed.
Hilgren believed that this was the only corner that had been neglected by screening.
Thompson stated that the buses would only be outside the building for short periods of time.
He added that the School District was not asking for any special favors and wanted to screen the
site adequately to be good neighbors. Thompson said that he had not seen the plans for the
adjacent site but would be willing to work with Staff on providing screening.
Franzen stated that the berm and fence needed to wrap around the southeast corner because of
the houses. Franzen believed that trade-offs could be made which would not increase the cost
to the school district.
Sandstad asked what the distance was to the residents. Franzen replied 75 feet from the edge
of the property line and approximately 300 feet from the building.
Thompson stated that the school district took issue with the wooden fence because of the
maintenance costs.
Sandstad asked how critical timing was for the project. Thompson replied that fill from this site
would be needed at Central Middle School.
John Hamilton stated that the School District had no desire to build a new bus garage. The City
recommended the site. The School District wants to be a good neighbor. Hamilton noted that
there were not many other school districts have buses stored indoors. There would be no view
into the building. Hamilton further noted that this building was in an industrial zone.
Clish asked Hamilton what he would recommend. Hamilton replied screening mainly the
residential area and not the industrial area. Franzen replied that if this was a warehouse with a
loading dock the loading area would require screening so the School District is not being asked
to do anything more than what would be required for an industrial use. Franzen added that a
• good quality fence would screen the building adequately. He noted that even conifer trees would
be planted 10 to 12 feet apart.
Schlampp believed that the fencing should be highway standard quality. Franzen recommended
that the fence be a 2" thick construction.
Clish asked if the City required a 35 year fence in other commercial areas. Yes, on Top View
acres Menards built a highway fence. He added that with narrow setbacks fencing is the only
solution. Greater setback would allow a higher berm.
Kardell asked if there was adequate parking on the site. Franzen replied that the parking
provided by the proponent met ordinance requirements. Kardell asked if the parking could be
adjusted to provide additional room for berming. Thompson replied that part of the parking was
for the public use of the eight tennis courts.
Bauer recommended approval of the plan with Staff to work with the developer on resolving the
screening issue.
MOTION 1:
Bauer moved, seconded by Kardell to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0-0.
• MOTION 2:
Bauer moved, seconded by Kardell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request
of Independent School District #272 for Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning
District on 8.31 acres based on plans dated May 7, 1993 and subject to the recommendations of
the Staff Report dated May 7, 1993. Motion carried 7-0-0.
MOTION 3:
Bauer moved, seconded by Kardell to'recommend to the City Council approval of the request
of Independent School District #272 for Site Plan Review on 8.31 acres based on plans dated
May 7, 1993 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 7, 1993.
Motion carried 7-0-0.
V. MEMBERS' REPORTS
VI. CONTINUING BUSINESS
VII. NEW BUSINESS
VIII. PLANNERS" REPORTS
IX. ADJOURNmENT
MOTION:
Kardell moved, seconded by Clinton to adjourn the meeting at 10:45 PM. Motion carried 7-0-0.