Loading...
Planning Commission - 06/10/1996 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 10, 1996 7:00 p.m. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Kenneth E. Clinton, Randy Foote, Bill Habicht, Ismail Ismail, Katherine Kardell, Douglas Sandstad, Mary Jane Wissner STAFF MEMBER: Michael Franzen, City Planner I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE--ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. MINUTES IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. TOM THUMB GAS PUMPS by Mike Eiker. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the Neighborhood Commercial District on 2 acres, Site Plan Review on 2 acres, for construction of an additional gas pump island. Location: Southeast corner of Dell Road and Townline Road. do B. PURGATORY CREEK ESTATES (1996)by Barry and Brian Post. Request for Preliminary Plat on 4.98 acres into 7 lots. Location: 12381 Sunnybrook Road. C. MITCHELL VILLAGE by Centex Homes. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review and Planned Unit Development District Review on 41 acres,Zoning District Change and Site Plan Review on 19.65 acres,Preliminary Plat of 41 acres into 21 lots and 5 outlots and road right-of-way. Location: Anderson Lakes Parkway and Mitchell Road. D. HARTFORD AREA ONE RETAIL 1996 by Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 24.43 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.27 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service District on 1.27 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.27 acres and Preliminary Plat of 4.43 acres into 2 lots. Location: Prairie Center Drive and Prairie Lakes Drive V. MEMBERS' REPORTS A. Livable Communities Action Plan VI. CONTINUING BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS VIII. PLANNERS' REPORTS APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION is June 10, 1996 COMMISSION MEMBERS: Kenneth E. Clinton, Randy Foote, Ismail Ismail, Katherine Kardell, Douglas Sandstad, Bill Habicht,Mary Jane Wissner STAFF MEMBERS: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner Kathleen O'Connor,Recording Secretary I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE--ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chair Clinton. Katherine Kardell was absent; all other members were present. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote to approve the Agenda as published. Motion carried 6-0. • III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- APRIL 22, 1996 Sandstad moved, seconded by Habicht to approve the Minutes of April 22, 1996 as published. Motion carried 6-0. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. TOM THUMB GAS PUMPS by Mike Eiker. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the Neighborhood Commercial District on 2 acres, Site Plan Review on 2 acres for construction of an additional gas,pump island. Location: Southeast corner of Dell Road and Townline Road. Franzen reviewed the background of the Tom Thumb commercial center which was approved in 1986 as part of the Hidden Glen Planned Unit Development. The proposal is to add two more fueling pumps (for a total of four), and extend the existing canopy to the north. Elden Bott, 18772 Pennington, inquired as the location of the proposed pumps in relationship to the exiting ones, and which direction will the lights face. Eiker explained they will be located to the north ofthe existing pumps and the lighting will conform to the City's ordinance for recessed lights. • 1 Bott also had concerns about the intercom system being left on occasionally and music being played through it. . Eiker stated the State Fire Code requires two way communication with the pumps. However,it should not be left on nor have music piped through it Wissner asked if there has a been an increase in demand for gas pumps in the area, or is the proposal based on speculation. Eiker explained in order keep pace with the market place this was being done partly on a defensive posture and speculation to stay ahead of the demand expected during peak hours. Ismail asked if past issues of vandalism and trash around the fence line have continued to pose problems. Franzen stated the City has received no further complaints. Sandstad inquired if the City has adopted a noise ordinance. Franzen answered yes. Any complaints about noise from the loud speaker system, or otherwise, would be investigated and dealt with accordingly. MOTION 1: Sandstad moved, seconded by Foote to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Sandstad moved, seconded by Foote to recommend to the City Council • approval of the request of Mike Eiker for Zoning District Amendment on 2 acres based on plans dated June 7, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 7, 1996. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 3: Sandstad moved, seconded by Foote to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Mike Eiker for Site Plan Review on 2 acres based on plans dated June 7, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 7, 1996. Motion carried 6-0. B. PURGATORY CREEK ESTATES (1996)by Barry and Brian Post. Request for Preliminary Plat on 4.98 acres into 7 lots. Location: 123 81 Sunnybrook Road. Franzen gave some background information on the project, explaining it had come before the Planning Commission before in 1994. The major issue with the project at that time had to do with its impact on the wetlands and the need to obtain appropriate permits to fill wetland area. Barry Post reviewed the project plans and the areas that effect wetlands. Ron Peterson with Peterson Environmental explained how the original delineation of the property was done and why the outcome is different now then before. He stated originally the testing was done during the winter of 1994 with snow and frozen soil. Now having redone the tests in more favorable conditions the project proves to have • much less negative impact on the wetlands then first believed. The delineation has now been approved by the Watershed District and Army Corp of Engineers. 2 Post explained in order to fill wetlands in the City of Eden Prairie you need to have permits from the DNR,the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency,the Army Corp of Engineers, and the Watershed District. In 1994,they had only obtained two of the • necessary four permits. Today they have all four. Foote asked what type of houses would be built. Post answered they would be two story and rambler walkouts in the$250,000 to $300,000 range. Richard Sentz, 12650 Sunnybrook Road, stated he is very impressed with the layout the Posts have presented for the seven lots and as far as he is concerned the project can't happen fast enough. Gerard Wersel, 12645 Sumybrook Road, explained when the project was first presented in 1994 he was not in favor because of the impact on the wetlands. He asked Peterson to explain what has made the difference today on the delineation. Peterson explained the delineation was based on three criteria; soil,vegetation,and water table based on the 1987 wetland manual. The difference was determined by the time ofyear and the use of the 1987 wetland manual as opposed to the 1989 manual as previously used. Wersel also asked about the proposed sidewalk and which side of the road it would be on. Franzen explained it will be on the north side of the road. • Wersel inquired about the shoreline ordinance and the proximity of the homes to the Conservancy Area. Franzen explained why the City felt it was acceptable to modify the conservancy area line in order to allow the project as proposed. Libby Hargrove, 12640 Sunnybrook Road, stated while she would much prefer to see a five lot plan instead of seven, she can find no fault with the proposed project and has no complaints. Sandstad expressed concern about a fifty inch oak tree on lot one which will be lost by the plan. He went on to explain he estimates a fifty inch oak must be close to three hundred years old. Post stated he shares Sandstad's concern and they have attempted to develop lot plans to allow it to remain,however,they did not find a viable solution. The developer does, however, plan to replace up to two hundred caliper inches of trees. Habicht also considered the loss of the oak tree,but agreed with the developer that it sits right in the muddle of the lot configuration,making it most difficult to save. He felt the project is well thought out. MOTION 1: Wissner moved, seconded by Habicht to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 6-0. 3 MOTION 2: Wissner moved, seconded by Habicht to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Barry and Brian Post for Preliminary Plat on 4.98 acres based plans dated June 7, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 7, 1996. Motion carried 6-0. C. MITCHELL VILLAGE by Centex Homes. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review and Planned Unit Development District Review on 41 acres,Zoning District Change and Site Plan Review on 19.65 acres,Preliminary Plat of 41 acres into 21 lots and 5 outlots and road right-of-way. Location: Anderson Lakes Parkway and Mitchell Road. Franzen explained that the property is currently zoned RM-2.5. The developer is proposing to downzone the property to RM-6.5. The net density of the project is 6.5 units per acre. Dan Blake of Centex Homes displayed photos of the site which showed many dump sites and piles of debris as well as the extensive tree damage by beavers. Cleanup is not possible without significant tree loss. However,while tree loss for the project is estimated to be 67%,they plan tree replacement at almost twice the required formula. Blake stated the planned homes will be two stories with two car garages in a variety of architectural styles. They will have vinyl siding with brick accent and should range in price from$105,000 to$130,000. • Foote asked about tree loss at the corner of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Mitchell Road since it is such a visible spot in the heart of town. Blake explained they will attempt to save as many trees as possible,but most will be lost. Many will be lost along the street side due to the City right-of-way and plans for a sidewalk. Sandstad inquired if all of the buildings will have fire sprinkler systems. Blake said it will be required for some of the buildings due to size, but they may possibly be installed in all of them. Ismail asked if a recreational facility is planned for the development. Blake stated there are no plans for one. Wissner asked Alan Gray if there are plans for a traffic light at the intersection of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Mitchell Road. Gray explained a light will be installed in the future,however,it may be two or three years away. Wissner also mentioned the drainage problems experienced by the neighboring Atherton townhomes and inquired whether it was anticipated that Mitchell Village would improve the situation. Blake believes it will be an improvement. Sandstad mentioned the fact the property to the north is industrial and asked how that transition will be handled. Franzen stated transition is required by ordinance and when the site to the north develops,berming and landscaping will be required. 4 Carol Shear, 8363 Mitchell Road, expressed concerns about the ongoing drainage problems experienced by homeowners in the area. She also is concerned about the swimming pool and the chance the development may bring more non-residents into the Atherton pool area which could be a liability problem. In addition she spoke of the traffic problems, as well as tree and habitat loss. However, she is happy the development will not be more apartments or rental properties. Melony Quelor, 8220 Mitchell Road spoke of the traffic problems currently experienced on Mitchell Road. She also asked when construction would begin if plan is approved. Blake explained it is hoped construction could begin as early as this fall. Habicht was pleased to see the decrease in density and the fact the wetlands would remain. He also mentioned he shares the concerns about traffic but sees it as unavoidable. He is very comfortable with the plan as proposed. Ismail likes the project but asked if there would be future building in the area. Blake explained the areas not built upon during this project would remain undeveloped because they are wetland areas and will probably be dedicated to the City. Foote was uncomfortable with tree loss,however,he does not see how the debris can be cleaned up without the tree loss, and feels it is a well thought out project. Sandstad supports the project,it's fine tuned and the builder seems to be familiar with Commission's expectations. He is also pleased to see signals planned in the next couple of years. Wissner mentioned while the area looks good from the road, once you get into it you see so much ofthe debris and tree loss. She supports the project and thinks it will be an asset in the area. Clinton also likes the project and thinks it makes good use of the land. MOTION 1: Habicht moved, seconded by Ismail to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Habicht moved, seconded'by Ismail to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Centex Homes for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 41 acres based on plans dated June 7, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 7, 1996. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 3: Habicht moved, seconded by Ismail to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Centex Homes for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change on 41 acres based on plans dated June 7, 1996 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 7, 1996. Motion • carried 6-0. 5 MOTION 4: Habicht moved, seconded by Ismail to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Centex Homes for Site Plan Review of 19.65 acres based on plans dated June 7, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report • dated June 7, 1996. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 5: Habicht moved, seconded by Sandstad to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Centex Homes for Preliminary Plat of 41 acres based on plans dated June 7, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 7, 1996. Motion carried 6-0. D. HARTFORD AREA ONE RETAIL 1996 by Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 24.43 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.27 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service District on 1.27 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.27 acres and Preliminary Plat of 4.43 acres into 2 lots. Location: Prairie Center Drive and Prairie Lakes Drive. Franzen reviewed the history of the project stating in 1995 the City approved a 30,000 square foot building for PetSmart on part of this site and gave concept approval to 6,000 square feet of additional retail. Final approval for the 6,000 square foot retail building was not granted because architectural plans were not prepared at that time. The current request is for a 6,000 square foot building with architecture consistent with the standards approved of the P.U.D. and is the same as that of PetSmart. Franzen pointed out that a three foot parapet wall would be adequate to screen mechanical equipment. Also, a sidewalk would be constructed along the north and south sides of the building since that is where the entrances are,rather than the west side. Tom Palmquist of Ryan Companies presented the plans for the site. He explained to the Commission Hartford Place consists of seven sites. Site 1 is PetSmart, Site 2 is still vacant, Site 3 are twin homes, Site 4 are single family homes, Sites 5 and 6 are the Pulte Project, and Site 7 runs from Prairie Center Drive west to the wetlands. Ismail asked what uses are planned for the retail center. Palmquist stated possibilities include a card and gift shop,men's clothing,hair salon,and an optician. Wissner asked if PetSmart's parking lot was to service this building as well. Palmquist stated that is correct. He also advised they hope to begin construction this summer. Wissner asked Alan Gray if there have been complaints about traffic in the area. Gray said the City has received a few complaints regarding rush hour. MOTION 1: Foote moved, Sandstad seconded to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. 6 MOTION 2: Foote moved, Sandstad seconded to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota for Planned Unit Development Concept Review Amendment on 24.43 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.27 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service District on 1.27 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.27 acres and Preliminary Plat of 4.43 acres into 2 lots. Motion carried 6-0. V. MEMBERS' REPORTS A. Livable Communities Action Plan Commissioners reviewed the draft of the Eden Prairie Livable Communities Action Plan. Sandstad said he supports the drafted plan. Wissner read from the plan, "The housing goals the City has agreed to pursue over the next fifteen years correspond favorably with the goals set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. However,unlike the goals in the Comprehensive Plan,which are very general,the Livable Communities goals set specific numeric targets for the City to achieve by 2010." Foote asked if the program is voluntary. Wissner explained it is voluntary. Foote asked if there are penalties for non-participation. Wissner stated there are not. Ismail asked how Eden Prairie looks comparatively for housing. Franzen stated the City is currently 30%housing less than$115,000. Habicht said he was very impressed with the detail of the report. MOTION: Foote moved, seconded by Ismail to accept the Livable Communities Action Plan. Motion carried 5-0. B. Ed Schlampp's Property Foote stated he recently went by Ed Schlampp's property and was very impressed with the layout and the whole overall project. VI. CONTINUING BUSINESS None. VU. NEW BUSINESS None. • 7 VIII. PLANNERS' REPORTS Franzen stated June and July will be very busy meetings for the Commission. There will be seven projects to review: 1) A single family project for West 82nd Street and Dell Road. 2) Office Depot planned for the old Eden Prairie Presbyterian Church site. 3) Single family homes for south and west of County Road 4 and County Road 1. 4) A small office building for Roland Road and Shady Oak. 5)An industrial building on Golden Triangle by Viking Drive. 6)Little Red's request to add a gas pump. 7) One other housing project. Wissner asked if there were any plans for the former Lund's store as yet. Franzen said nothing so far. IX. ADJOURNMENT MOTION:Wissner moved, seconded by Foote to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5- 0. The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. • 8