City Council - 06/20/1978 APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
tUESDAY, JUNE 20, 1978 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel , Billy Bye, Joan Meyers,
Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Roger
Pauly; Planner Chris Enger; Finance Director
John Frane; Director of Community Services
Bob Lambert; Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce
Provo, Recording Secretary
INVOCATION: Councilman Dave Osterholt
' ILL: Bye, Osterholt, Pauly and Penzel present; Meyers absent.
s
I. -'ROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS ti
The following items were requested to be added to the agenda:
A. Setting date for next Guide Plan Meeting under "New Business"
B. Discussion by Councilman Bye on meeting with Metropolitan
Airports Commission under Reports of council members" .
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the agenda as amended
and published. Motion carried unanimously. i
II. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Payment of Claims Nos. 10392 - 10638
B. Set Public Hearing for Lake Trail Estates for July 5, 1978
C. " Set Public Hearing for Norman Addition for July 5, 1978
D. Approve plans and specifications and order advertisement for
bids for sanitary sewer on Eden Road, L. C. 51-320 Resolution
No. 78-113
E. Resolution No. 78-115, requesting Minnesota Department of Transportation for
traffic speed survey on Old Flying Cloud Drive
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded_ by Osterholt, to approve items A - E on the Consent
Calendar. ' Roll Call Vote: Bye, Osterholt, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion
carried unanimously.
III. MINUTES
A. Minutes of the Board of Review Meeting held Wednesday, June 7,L 1978
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the minutes of the
1. Board of Review held Wednesday, June 7, 1978, as published. Motion carried
unanimously.
Council Minutes - 2 - Tues. ,June 20, 1978
III. MINUTES (continued)
B. Minutes of the City. Council Meeting held Wednesday, June 7, 1978
Pg. 4, after the sixth paragraph, add a new paragraph to read as follows :
"Ostenson stated he is prepared to put a drainage pipe in at this time
according to City specifications."
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the minutes of the
City Council held Wednesday, June 7, 1978, as amended and published.
Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Prairie East 7th, request by Hustad Development Corporation, to rezone
from Rural to RM 6.5 and preliminary platapproval Resolution No.
78-106 and Ordinance No. 78-31
City Manager Ulstad explained this is a continued Public Hearing from
June 7, 1978, and the proponent is prepared to .answer concerns raised by
Council members at that time.
Jim Ostenson, Hustad Development Corporation, explained Hustad is prepared
to put in the necessary pipe to take care of the drainage. He further {
commented that Hustad's engineer has met with City Engineer Jullie and the
drainage issue has been resolved and the proponent will begin installation
of the pipe immediately. In addition , Mr. Ostenson stated he has met
with the residents regarding the screening and has visually walked the site
with them, and the residents are in agreement with what the proponents
have proposed. There will be a 25 foot natural strip, plus additional
berming and screening will be provided along the area to satisfy the
residents who will have a definite input as to the type of plants and f
spacing.
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated June 15, 1978,
regarding the neighborhood park site in the area of Franlo Road and answered
questions of Council members.
Roger Pollock, 9950 Friar Drive, and Mr. Green, 9935 Friar Drive, expressed
concern over the storm sewer system. Rick Sathre, McCombs-Knutson, outlined
the drainage plan and installation of same.
City Engineer Jullie added that the proposed drainage system as outlined by
Mr. Sathre will work, however, reiterated it is critical the swale is put
in properly.
Mrs. Green asked who would be sodding the swale. Mr. Ostenson replied
Hustad would be sodding the swale.
Mr. Pollock further questioned how long it would take to have the storm sewer
completed. Ostenson replied it would take about six weeks to install the
storm sewer in the area.
i
Pollock referred to the easement which runs across lots 11 , 12, 13 and lot 1 .
Mr. Sathre explained there is not a valid reason why the easement could not be
narrowed, and it would be a matter of asking the Council to vacate a portion of
the easement.
Council Minutes - 3 - Tues . ,June 20, 1978
{
1
F
A. Prairie East 7th (continued)
Osterholt questioned if the proponents had considered single family.
City Planner Enger replied he had discussed single family homes in the area
with the proponent, however, Windsor is interested in building the townhouses
and is proposing same. g
Pauly commented in reference to Mr. Osterholt's query regarding single family
housing, that the Council is not looking at a .new piece of land. This land
has always been proposed as multiple units _ and, because of that, to change
the previously existing plan doesn' t seem quite right. Pauly felt Hustad's
has also worked out a satisfactory drainage plan and has worked with City
Engineer Juliie on this plan. Therefore, she supports the proposal .
H
Osterholt felt this proposal is still an intrusion on the single family
neighborhood and he does not feel the setbacks are adequate. Further it '
is not doing the single famly homes in the area any good by putting in multiple.
Frank Thomas, 9785 Garrison, he would like to see more setbacks if this were
at all possible.
Ostenson requested of the Council that the Public Hearing on Prairie East 7th
be continued to the July 5th Council meeting.
}
a
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to continue the Public Hearing on
Prairie East to the July 5th Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Darkenwald Duplexes, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 for 2
existing single family and 52 duplex lots, and Preliminary p)at approval
TResolution No. 78-102 and Ordinance No. 78-30
City Manager Ulstad explained Mr. Darkenwald has requested that this Public
Hearing be continued to the July 5th Council meeting.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to continue the Darkenwald
Duplexes Public Hearing to July 5, 1978. Motion carried unanimously.
V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
No reports.
VI . ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-29 rezoning from RM 2.5 to RM 6. 5 for one
four-plex and 2 duplex lots for Olympic Hills First Addition, Olympic Hil s
Corporation, Outlot B� and developers agreement
Osterholt questioned if this is the total extent of the Master Plan and if
Olympic Hills Corporation would commit to no further development of the golf
course. Don McGlynn, Olympic Hills Corporation, stated he would be willing to
give a statement to that effect.
Osterholt asked if Olympic Hills Corporation owns the properties involved.
Mr. McGlynn replied part of the land is owned by The Preserve, and Olympic
Hills Corporation is in a joint venture with The Preserve.
Council minutes
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-29. Olympia Hills First Addition (continued)
Osterholt further questioned if Mr. McGlynn will agree that the City will not
take over the road as a public street. Mr. McGlynn stated he would be willing
to agree with Mr. Osterholt' s request. - McGlynn further commented
the private road is available for use by the police and fire department and
they are not trying to use it as a thoroughfare, it would serve abutting
properties. City Engineer Jullie stated it would be a public right-of-way;
however, Olympic Hills Corporation could past it a private road, but there would
be essentially no enforcement. Residents in the .-area could use it, and also
the police and fire.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 78-29, rezoning from RM 2.5 to RM 6.5 for one four-pl ex
and 2 duplex lots for Olympic Hills First Addition, Olympic Hills Corporation,
Outlot B. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the developers
agreement for Olympic Hills First Addition, Olympic Hills Corporation,
Outlot B. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Resolution No. 78-110 granting preliminaryapproval for Municipal Industrial
Development Bonds for Gelco Corporation in the amount of 1 ,000,000.00
.._ City Manaqer Ulstad explained Gelco Corporation meets the guidelines established
by the City_ and recommended the Council_ consider the adoption of Resolution
No. 78-110.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 7E-110,
granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds
for Gelco Corporation in the amount of $1 ,000,000.00. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Resolution No. 78-111granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial
Development Bonds for Eaton Char-Lynn in the amount of 1 ,000,000.00
City Manager Ulstad explained Eaton Char-Lynn meets the guidelines established
by the City and recommended the Council consider the adoption of Resolution
No. 78-111 .
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 78-111 ,
granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds
for Eaton Char-Lynn in the amount of $1 ,000,000.00. Motion carried
unanimously.
D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-23, Prairie East 8th and 9th, by Hustad
Development Corporation, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 and developers
agreement
-City -Manager Ulstad explained Ordinance No.- .78-23 was -continued from the
June 7th Council meeting for the purpose of resO ving the park issue,
which was part of discussion under item IV. A.
Osterholt asked about tot lots, and to what extent they are going to be
available in the 8th and 9th additions. John Woodland, Windsor Corporation,
explained there will be three tot lots, one in the 8th and one in the 9th
addition, and 1 in the common area between the two.
Council Minutes - 5 - Tues. ,June 20, 1978
}
D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-23, Prairie East 8th and 9th (continued)
Osterholt questioned if the City would be paying $150,000.00 for the
proposed 20 acre park site. Lambert replied in the affirmative.
f
g
Osterholt further commented sometimes when a developer comes in it might
be better for the City to ask for land dedication. Significant factor
is what the particular acreage cost the developer, and what the developer
is selling it to the City for.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the 2nd Reading of
Ordinance No. 78-23, Prairie East 8th and 9th, by Hustad Development ti
Corporation, rezoning from Rural to RM 6. 5. Pauly, Bye and Penzel voted
"aye" , Osterholt voted "nay" . Motion failed.
Osterholt suggested that reconsideration should be given to the above
motion at a time when five members are present to vote.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to reconsider the precious
motion and continue action on the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-23
to the July 5, 1978 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
E. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-44, street name changes
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 78-44, street name changes. Motion carried unanimously.
2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-09, COR Investment, rezoning from Rural
to RM 6.5 for 48 duplex units, and 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-10,
":OR Investment, rezoning from Planned Study to Office District for 1
ffice lot, and developers agreement
sterholt commented he thought there was going to be an access to the
,,roperty directly west. City Planner Enger responded an exhibit will
be attached to the developers agreement showing the access to the property
to the west.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 78-09, COR Investment, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 for
48 duplex units. Motion carried unanimously. x .
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 78-10, COR Investment, rezoning from Planned Study to
Office District for 1 Office lot. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the developers agreement
for COR Investment. Motion carried unanimously.
G. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-15, Hillsborough and Hillsborough 2nd,
The Preserve, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and developers agreement
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 78-15, Hillsborough and Hillsborough 2nd, The Preserve,
rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Minutes - 6 - Tues. ,June 20, 1978
G. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-15, Hillsborough and Hillsborough 2nd (continued) ;
Changes were made in the developers agreement as follows: Page 1 ,
item 3, 3rd line, strike "as scenic easement", in the last line after
"covenant" add the following language "covering the scenic easement
as delineated on Exhibit "B" . Page 2, *3rd line, strike "Outlot A" and
insert in lieu thereof "scenic easement" .
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the developers
agreement as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
H. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-22, Prairie East 4th, 5th and 6th,
Hustad Development Corporation, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and
developers agreement
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 78-22, Prairie East 4th, 5th and 6th, Hustad Development
Corporation, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5. Motion carried unanimously.
Additional verbiage to be worked out by City Attorney on page 2, item
7, and an amendment to item 19 on page 4.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the developers
agreement for Prairie East 4th, Sth and Gth as amended by City Attorney.
Motion carried unanimously.
' I . REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Appointment of one member to the Planning Commission to fill -an
unexpired term to 2/281 80
This item was continued to the July 5, 1978 Council meeting.
2. Councilman Bye reported on his meeting with the Metropolitan
Airports Commission regarding the establishment of an advisory
commission for Flying Cloud Airport. Bye distributed the
Policy Statement from M.A.C. pertaining to same.
Council members requested that the ordinance establishing
the advisory commission be placed on the July 5th Council
agenda.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Ratification of Super Yalu Stores, Inc. , developers agreement for
a corporate headquarters
City Manager Ulstad reviewed the background on Super Valu`s developers
agreement: On May 4th the City sent a preliminary draft of .the developers
agreement to Super Valu for their approval . Super Valu. countered with a
proposal outlining the points that they felt were reasonable, based on the
guidelines and ordinances of the City. As a result of the counter proposal ,
Mr. Ulstad requested of the legal counsel of Super Valu to explain by
communication their reasons to substantiate their, requested changes in the
draft of the •develoopers agreement, outlined in such communication dated May 30.
from Mike Brewer, legal counsel for Super Valu. As a result of that
Council Minutes - 7 - Tues. ,June 20, 1978
F
1. Ratification of Super Valu Stores, Inc. , developers agreement for
a corporate headquarters continue T
communication, Mr. Ulstad then redrafted the agreement and submitted it
to Super Valu for their review based on what he felt was reasonable
for their consideration. Based on the redraft of the agreement� Super y
Valu still had some items of concern based on rules, regulations and
ordinances of the City. Mr. Ulstad met with Super Valu on June 7th and
reviewed those points that they were still concerned about. At that point
Super Valu asked that in the developers agreement there be a point adopted {
as to a deck to extend down to the lake for the purpose of their employees
to enjoy the lake. On June 7th, this item was on the agenda and Mr.
Ulstad explained he was not prepared to outline all changes in the agreement r
and asked for a continuation. A special meeting was then set by the Council ?
y
for June 12th. On June 12th the Council did review the redrafted agreement,
and there was discussion relative to the deck and the size. Mr. Ulstad
proceeded, through the City`s legal counsel , to change item 3 in the agreement ,
to address a deck which extends out in the lake approximately 9 feet.
Osterholt questioned where the deck would be located. Mr. Morrissey responded
perpendicular to the cafetoria.
Joel Harding, 7060 Willow Creek Road, read a Statement of Position signed
by residents of The Cove and Willow Creek areas. (Attached as part of
minutes)
Dr. Tangen, member of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission,
spoke on behalf of the Commission regarding their meeting held June 19th,
4L as outlined in memo dated June 20th by Director of Community Services
Lambert. Tangen reiterated it has always been the Commission's position
that the shoreline of Bryant Lake be left in an unaltered state.
Mike Brewer, legal counsel for Super Valu, noted that condition 3 and 10
in the letter of May 30th are part and parcel of the agreement, and it may
appear there is an inconsistency if taken out of context.
Phil Parsons, 6861 Beach Road, Gail Roettger, 6881 Beach Road, Elaine
Sorensen, 7121 Willow Creek Road, Steven Hemping, 6641 Beach Road,
Hayner Larson, 7011 Willow Creek Road, Mary Brill , 7041 Willow Creek Road,
Mrs. Wilkie, 7221 Willow Creek Road, Don Sorensen, 7121 Willow Creek Road,
Bruce Brill , 7041 Willow Creek Road, Bob Fransen, 6851 Beach Road, Martin
Hellman, 6921 Beach Road, Helen Bergren, A►nsden Hills in The Preserve,
Mr. & Mrs. Jim Perkins, 7012 Willow Creek Road, and Jim McNeill , 7251
Willow Creek Road, expressed concerns regarding the Super Valu rezoning,
i .e. , if 550 people of Super Valu have a party it may become out of control ,
Super Valu could monopolize the lake summer and winter, will set a precedent
for future development, residents were not notified of June 12th _Council
meeting, petition submftted does include other` points besides the
dock facility and requested reconsideration be taken on position already taken
by the Council , an exact diagram should be provided as to the size of the deck
and configuration of same by Super Valu, residents of Thy rove and Willow
Creek areas are vehemently opposed to any kind of dock on the premises of
Super Valu, Super Valu should occupy the land the way it was made known to
the residents in the first place, Super Valu is attempting to make the
area an employees park which is a detriment to the area does not feel
Super Valu has to use the lake to enjoy it, Super Valu Alas destroyed their
Council Minutes - 8 - Tues. ,June 20, 1978
1. Ratification of Super Valu Stores, Inc. , developers agreement (continued)
credibility with the residents as they have changed 15 out of the 20 items of the
agreement with them, - City should protect the marshes on both ends of the
property, the pond in the middle and two hills and land adjacent thereof,
would like to .believe Super Valu could adequately maintain and police this
area, but thinks it is an impossibility, an indepth study of the effect
of the changes in the developers agreement should be provided, afraid
if Super Valu is allowed to put in a dock, that if other office complexes
build on the available 100 acres they might also want a dock, size of the
dock, Bryant Lake is a natural resource for birds and wildlife and questioned
if the dock would have an affect on them, can fish from shore just as easily
as from a dock, Super Valu will cause a significant nuisance with or without
a dock if employees are allowed to come on weekends and have picnics,
Super Valu employees are using the property now and they have stated they
have permission from Super Valu and they have launched boats and canoes,
and if it is a place of business why does Super Valu have to have a dock.
Uls tad explained the same 'p procedure is followed on any 2nd Reading of an
ordinance whereby notices are not sent out. The meeting of June 12th was
set at an open meeting on June 7th.
Bye commented that Eden Prairie needs a solid tax base. We have some fine
industrial concerns that are contributing. This should be one of our finest
moments to gain an industrial office user whey they lease their warehouse
in Hopkins and put one gigantic facility out here in Eden Prairie. Some
of these 500 people may buy homes out here and increase our ability to provide
the services we have now. If you get into an economical question, the industrial
office concern takes out of the City significantly less than what they put back
in. In this particular case the question is should the dock be-allowed or should
it be taken away? Bye further stated at what point does Super Valu walk away.
John Morrissey, Vice President - Distribution, Super Valu, explained they
do not intend to be an employee picnic area. Do not intend people should picnic
during off hours and would not make it attractive for them to do so. Basic
intent is to keep it as an attractive place of business.
Charles Dugan, Vice President - Legal & Insurance, Super Valu, stated they
would reasonably police it.
Bye asked Mr. Morrissey: 1) Now that you have listened to the discussion
have you and your group representing Super Valu any adjustments that you could
propose to the over water dock as far as square footage is concerned, and 2) if
you were granted a certain square footage what, if any, citizen involvement
would Super Valu be willing to work with.
ti
3
Dr. Tangen requested that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
be made part of the involvement. {
L
A
A brief rec2SS iNdS Ca i led f^vr Super Valu t0 i c^S j+.^..^.d X q.-loe-Stions raised by
Councilman Bye.
Meeting reconvened and. Mr. Morrissey stated Super Valu would be receptive
to a docking facility consisting of the following: 6 feet over the water,
40 feet in width, for a total of 240 square feet , and 560 square feet on land,
for a total of 800 feet. Mr. Morrissey commented that Super Valu would be willing
to consult with the residents of Bryant Lake, but feel Super Valu has to have the
Council Minutes - 9 Tues . ,June 20, 1978
1. Ratification of Super Valu Stores, Inc. , developers agreement (continued)
final approval . Reluctant to work with the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission.
Bill Bearman, member of the Planning Commission, stated this seems to be
a new twist not requiring people to come back with a future s i to plan.
Penzel responded it was felt the floodplain management plan was of an adequate
nature to require the proponents to come back to the City in any case.
Dr. Tangen felt this is not an issue that just concerns the citizens of
Bryant Lake, it concerns entire citizens of Eden Prairie. The Parks, Recreation
& Natural Resources Commission is charged with the responsibility of natural
resources and they should be a part of any further discussion.
i
Pauly requested of the audience if there were any other items
which should be included in the PUD developers agreement as
amended. There were no further requests.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to ratify the PUD developers agreement
with changes dated 6/20/78, including the amend merit concerning the
dock facilities,using square footage figures of 6 teef over the water, 40
feet in width, for a total of 240 square feet, and 560 square feet on land,
for a total of 800 square feet. Further that the proposal for the structure
be submitted for review by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
and the City Council , and that it be made accessible to the residents in the
immediate area. Super Valu shall provide such security with respect to Parcel BB
as shall be reasonably necessary to prevent the use of Parcel BB by its employees
and invitees or trespassers thereon in such a manner as to create a oubiic
nuisance to the residents in the area, and if security is not sufficient, that
this be brought to the attention of the City Council . Motion carried
unanimously.
rt of City Attorney
No report.
D. Report of Planning Director
1. Housing and Redevelopment Authority agreement between Hennepin Count
and City of Eden Prairie Resolution No. 78-109
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 78-109,
requesting Hennepin County to apply for Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
Home Improvement Grant Funds for implementation within the City of Eden
Prairie. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to continue the Council meeting past the
scheduled adjournment time of 11 :30 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Joint Master Plan for Anderson Lakes (continued from June 7, 1978)
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue this item to the July
18, 1978 Council meeting when a representative of the Hennepin County
Park Reserve District will be available. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Minutes - 10 - Tues. ,June 20, 1978
E. Report of Director of Community Services_ (continued)
2. Eden Prairie Stables Lease (continued from June 7, 1978)
Director of Community Services Lambe�^t requested that letters from
Wayne Kinion, Quentin Robley, Bill Anderson and R. T. Mulcrone be
entered into the record. (Attached as part of minutes) Lambert spoke
to his memo dated June 16 and answered questions of Council members.
Glen Lorenz, lessee of the Eden Prairie Stables , agreed with the
fact they will have to wait for the Metropolitan Council to act on something
as far as funds are concerned and would be willing to wait for construction
and the new development. However, Mr. Lorenz requested the City do some
minor improvements to the site for the benefit of maintaining the
property in its present state.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve a 3 years lease
for Eden Prairie Stables at $428.00 as of 6/l/78, and an increase of
7% for the following two years, with the provision that if a major
facility is being considered that it be brought back before the Council .
Further, that the Council direct the City Staff to clean up the area and do
minor improvements. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Northwestern Bell request
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated June 16, 1978 4
regarding the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission's action I
of June 5, 1978.
Mr. George Soash, Northwestern Bell , appeared before the Council
speaking to their request.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the recommendation
of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission of June 5, 1978,
as outlined in memo from Director of Community Services Lambert dated
June 16, 1978. Motion carried unanimously.
F. Report of City Engineer
1. Consider bids for utility and street improvements in Norseman Industrial
Park 2nd Addition, I. C. 51-319 Resolution No, 78-11
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to award the bid for utility
and street improvements in Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition,
I. C. 51-319, to the lowest responsible bidder, Northdale Construction
Company, in the amount of $244,193.50. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Byes
Pauly and Penzel voted "aye" . Motion carried unanimously.
2. Receive 100% petition and crder advertisement for the Crosstown Industrial
Park, I.C. 51-329 Resolution No. 78-114
MOTION: nctorhnit mnvpd, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No.
78-114, ordering improvements and preparation of plans and specifications
for public improvements in the Crosstown Industrial Park 1st and 2nd
Addition, I. C. 51-329. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Minutes - 11 - Tues . ,June 20, 1978
3. Request from The Preserve for discussion of grading operations on
the site of proposed Amsden Hills IV Addition
Lee Johnson, The Preserve, spoke to his communication dated June 14, 1978.
City Engineer Jullie explained this matter is before the Council because
of questions raised by the residents. Mr. Jullie stated he agrees with the
concept of stockpiling, but uncomfortable issuing a grading permit when
The Preserve is coming around the corner with a zoning proposal . Suggested
Mr. Johnson come before the Council for direction.
Jim Edwards, 10260 Amsden Way, stated he is at the Council meeting to try
and understand the procedure that should be followed. It is his understanding
that after a 1st hearing on Amsden IV, the next morning The Preserve was out
grading. Mr. Edwards assumed The Preserve had a permit to go ahead and grade,
however, found out 4 or 5 days later they didn't. He further stated he would
like to feel the residents have some protection by City ordinances. Further
Mr. Edwards feels the action taken by The Preserve is a gross violation of the
procedure to be followed.
Jullie explained after he had been notified of the grading, he called Mr.
Johnson and asked him to cease all grading operations and they complied.
Osterholt stated if this happens again the City would have no alternative
but to assess a fine to The Preserve. Mr. Johnson said he understood i
that this could happen.
Gary Wegner, 10220 Amsden Way, explained that a call was placed in the morning
to stop the earth moving and it continued to 5:OO PM. Mr. Johnson explained
it took him a full day to find out they were in violation.
No action necessary.
4. Discussion of proposed transportation program
City Manager Ulstad explained last week at the Chamber of Commerce
meeting a presentation was made on behalf of the City Council outlining
proposed improvements relative to collector streets in our City. A report
was handed out and encouragement was given to the Chamber for their input.
The Development Commission will be going over the report on Wednesday.
Mr. Ulstad further stated he would like to sit down with the Transportation
Committee of the Chamber to go through the whole process .
Betty McNulty, representing the Chamber of Commerce, apologized for the way
the meeting was held. Commended City Manager Ulstad and staff for an
outstanding job and an excellent report.
No action necessary.
G. Report of Finance Director
1. LOGIS Agreement
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the LOGIS Agreement
as recommended by Finance Director Frane. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Minutes - 12 - Tues. ,June 20, 1978
VIII . NEW BUSINESS
A. Setting date for next Guide Plan Meeting
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to set Tuesday, June 27, 1978,
as a Special Council Meeting to discuss the Guide Plan. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Penzel asked if anyone would like to attend a meeting on Labor Relations
at the Ambassador Hotel on June 29. City Manager Ulstad was selected to attend
this meeting.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adjourn the Council meeting at
1 �): 57 AM. Motion carried unanimously.
�e
s
i
STAT-V,Z7T CF POSITION
IIn O: T11`7 CITE OFF "FRJ IR= and
-5L -- Tu'.LL STOP_^, I" COF�r'0 i�'`
The undersigned, .residents of The Cove and -Dillow Creek areas, desire to
apprise the City of 'Eden Prairie and auner Valu of their considered opinion re—
gard:Lng the proposed :super Valu Horne Office development on property abutting
3ryant's Lor.E7, Lake.
I. That considering the alternate development possibilities of the site, we
rup_port the concept of a high quality office use of the property in question to
y
the extent that such use is sensitive to the terrain and ecology of the site,
consistent with preserving as much of the existing natural amenities as is rea—
sonably possible, and compatible vith other pre—existinE, uses of properties ad—
joining the lake.
2. That several months ago, we, in good faith, designated a committee of
our residents to meet with Super Valu, express the areas of our concern, and
attempt to arrive at a mutually agreeable concept and proposal. Thereafter, a
meeting of the residents, officers of :Super Valu, and representatives .of Super
Valul s architects was held to acquaint the residents with the details of the pro—
posal, wbereat additional concerns of the residents were discussed and certain
representations and agreements were made by Super Valu.
That a majority, although not all, of the residents approved the pro—
posal as it was originally presented to the City• s Planning Commission and
Council,as we believed the twenty (W) provisions attached to the proposal by the
Council and the representations of Super Valu would serve to acknowledge and pro-
i
1
vide a means of control regarding our concerns.
4. That almost all of the undersigned are not knowledgeable in land use
planning and zoning procedures nor trained in the law and we, therefore, trusted
s
in the integrity of Super Valu and in our elected officials to effectuate what
we understood to be our agreement, but we now realize that we did not receive a
full disclosure of proposal's details and its effects.
5. That we received no notice, either formally or informally, of the special
meeting of the City Council held on Monday, June 12, 1978, but rather learned of
the same ny chance. That at that meeting a substantially different proposal was
presented. ' e, further, did not learn of the full impact of the changes until
7
after this special council meeting.
u. That now that we have had an opportunity to become informed of the de—
tails of the revised proposal, we are deeply disappointed and dismayed by the
actions of Super Valu which we believe to be directly contra to its P , y 2'Y previous
representations to us. Also, we are shocked that our City Council would even con—
sider, much less adopt, this plan without affording us adequate notice of and time
to evaluate this revised plan, which apparently is contrary to the advice and
recommendations of not only the City?s staff but its advisors commissions as well.
7. That we strongly urge both our City Council and Super Valu to reconsider
their actions and to adopt an agreement which is at least as responsiVe to our
concerns as the Re--zoning Agreement proposed by the City of Eden Prairie on May
4, 1978.
8, That apart from other considerations, we are vehemently opposed to the
grantint by the City of any permission to Super Valu for wW dock facilities or
other structures below the C154 foot ale'v'ation on the site.
:a
ra°
'�. ,� 44 ew. 'Oa�z
71,11
,T
We&/-,T
q
b f ? 2Z t (..til lUu) (.,C
c�
,r
•o
s
.
.ram- �.f
I
r
a
F
r �
---
s
i
i
Gam=
' s
' S
,1
ka-t-m 6
e_
1 �
4
- h
d -�ra ni
�: tiro
f'
i
a 4�,
t
r ,f
6.401 Shady Oak Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
June 7 , 1978
Mr. Robert Lambert
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairi-, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Lambert,
I am writing to urge that the City of Eden Prairie renew the lease
for Eden Prairie Stables with Bert and Alice Lear. I believe that having
horses and riding facilities is a good use of this park land and tax
money. There are many people currently served there in this way. Since
I live near the stables , I have a definite preference for horses and t
horse-riding over other , noisier forms of recreation.
Bert and Alice are good neighbors and I believe they are a wholesome
influence on the young people who come there to ride and on those who
work there.
I believe it would improve their morale to have a long-term lease,
and think it would enable them to better manage the program and facilities
if they could plan to be there for at least five years.
Since/rely,
Wayne Kinion
ST. CLOUD STATEUNIVERSITY U I ERSITY
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Dcpartmont (A Special Education
Iryl.'
St.Cloud, Minnesota 56301
(612) 255.2041
n
June 2, 1978
Mr. G1 en D. Lorenz
Advance Corporation
287 Lafeyette Road South
St. Paul , MN 55107
Dear Mr. Lorenz:
I am writing to you at the request of Mr. Murphy with whom I have discussed
your programs and plans. I hope to have the opportunity to visit with you
in the near future. I would like to share with you some facts and comments
about handicapped persons and horses.
The most important goal for any handicapped person is the development of a
good feeling of self-worth. This is true regardless of the nature of the
handicap, whether a person is hearing impaired, blind, orthepedically handi-
capped, retarded or different in other ways enough to have adjustment pro-
blems with the mainstream of American life . The best way to assist persons
in developing good feelings about themselves is the development of indepen-
dence , which means learning certain skills , adjusting according to their
environment, and giving and expecting responsibility of the individual
according to his or her capabilities . These are numerous examples where a
variety of activities in the horse industry have helped develop kkills and
bead to a much improved self-concept for handicapped persons. Without
reviewing the numerous horse programs which have been successful , just con-
sider the possibilities. First there is the relationship between a person
and the horse,'it automatically places responsibility on the person for care,
feeding, grooming, shelter, and medical attention. Horses make an unusually
good animal for this relationship to develop. The horse responds to con-
sistency and conditioning and their behavior is very predictable using a
basic set of rules. Generally handicapped persons have learned consistency
is necessary for their functioning, pair this with a horse and you have a
natural team. Next consider the physical aspects of horse care, riding, or
driving. These activities promote the development of coordination, balance,
strength, and general health. These physical benefits are probably the most
obvious benefits because they are directly observable.
There are many other benefits which may be derived from a horse program
for handicapped persons:
;a
ti(.St: is .ot oviai opportunity /affirmative action employer and is in compliance %vitli all state and federal laws prohibiting discrimination.
Mr. Glen D. Lorenz
June 2 . 1978
Page 2
1 . Motivation to get involved and interested in other hobbies
and activities.
2. The chance to work and interact with others with a common
interest.
3. The chance to solve problems and strive for improvement. s
a
4. The feeling of accomplishment gained when involved in
activities not normally associated with handicapped persons_
5. Training which could lead to employment.
6. An outlet for using leisure time in a productive manner.
P
Economically, there are no programs for the handicapped that do not have a
tremendous payoff for the American Public. Everytime a handicapped citizen
is able to become more independent it represents a great economic advantage
to tax payers over that persons lifetime.
From a moral point of view it is certainly our responsibility to provide the
best of all possible options for ishndicapped persons to allow them to develop f
to their full potential . In every field where the handicapped have been
allowred to be involved, employment, the arts , sports , etc, they have usually
exceeded the expectations of the persons involved. Give them the opportunity,
provide the options . and they will not let you down, but will probably sur-
prise you.
I heartily endorse the development of your program in order to provide more
options for handicapped persons. It is my understanding that your program
is carefully planned and the staff is well-trained and competent. I urge
ever."ne to provide the support necessary to make this program work.
Sincerely, C
Quenti n Robley
Asst. Professor, Special Education
QRtjk
}
94Rffo 5
�BunLr tad
190 132." ,M. W�A r►oka
i"pe ea arse)a"-nowe.0 36a bh
April 28 , 1978
Mr. Glen D. Lorenz
287 Lafayette Road South
St. Paul, MN 55107
Dear Mr. Lorenz :
This letter is in regards to your inquiry about Bunker Hills
Stable. The stable is located in Bunker Hills 17ounty Park in
Anoka. It is owned by the County of Anoka, and is operated by
Rainbow Trails , Inc . , as a lease agreement. The facilities and
name are owned by the county. The horses , equipment, and employees
are of Rainbow Trails , Inc . We offer trail rides , hay rides , rid-
ing lessons , and show ring facilities .
This arrangement is beneficial to Anoka County, the lessee,
but is mostly beneficial to the public . Approximately 20, 000
people used the horse facilities last year. These people would
not have been able to enjoy this beautiful facility if it were
not for a private business operating within the park.
If you have any further questions, please call me at 757-7010
Sincerely yours ,
Bill. Anderson
1wanap er
djp
,SATE
MINNESOTA
CORRECTIONS BOARD
1yNE50 j
May 11, 1978
To Whom it May Concern:
Recreational outlets are important counterbalances to the idleness
which often leads both young people and adults alike into delinquency
and crime.
I have recently been made aware of the Eden Prarie Stables and the
possibility of its being forced to close. -1 would hope that those who
must make that decision will weigh carefully its impact. Those committed
to horse rearing and showing are a unique group of people whose efforts
strengthen family ties, teach young people responsibility, show concern
for other living things, and augment public recreational dollars. Any
one of those efforts would be sufficient reason for the continuance of
the Eden Prarie Stables. Cu rwlatively, the fulfillment of those efforts
is an important part of the social health of any community. While
everyone who participates in the Eden Prarie Stables may not be from
that community, the need for the facility and the over-riding social
good resulting are powerful arguements for its continuance.
I am hopeful that thoughtful persons will be able to resolve any
public health concerns and esthetic flaws while allowing the Stable
to continue its important social contribution.
;j
Si ce ly,
R. Mulcrone, Chairman
Minnesota Corrections Board
RTM/m
SUITE 238 METRO SQUARE BUILDING • SEVENTH AND ROBERT STREETS • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
r
- -
Y, — —
WE, the undersigned, support the continued operation of Eden Prairie
Stables by the current management, and request that the City of Eden
Prairie provide a long-term lease and make requested improvements for
the following reasons :
1) EPS has proven itself to be a place where entire families can
enjoy the pleasures of horsemanship. It provides a special
recreational opportunity for many young people, who otherwise might
have many idle hours .
2) EPS provides an opportunity for young and old alike to improve
their skills and add to their knowledge of riding and horses.
3) EPS has proven the excellent quality of its training and
instruction through the many awards received at competitive horse
shows throughout the area.
4) EPS provides employment for private citizens and is not a burden
on the taxpayers of the city.
5) EPS is an irreplaceable facility in terms of location, and its
loss would cause hardship to many who cannot utilize stables located
far out in the countryside.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
55chvi-`1 LO"."C"ia SISJ- 6ibi,
70
nA�) e7 L-P9_C' Cin R c\,,k) [c
r)J Y\ Pr�i 1're 0,
� � ' j ' / i 1(s' '- l_. ../• ✓ G`C''. ," - ia..l.:'_ 1 �- ',,: ) ►; 1�..�h-� �,
Lz l3
JCAJ
aa
M i
7 *, •-�
r
i
WE, the undersigned, support the continued operation of Eden Prairie
Stables by the current management, and request that the City of Eden
Prairie provide a long-term lease and make requested improvements for
the following reasons :
1) EPS has proven itself to be a place where entire families can
enjoy the pleasures of horsemanship. It provides a special
recreational opportunity for many young people, who otherwise might
have many idle hours.
2) EPS provides an opportunity for young and old alike to improve
their skills and add to their knowledge of riding and horses .
3) EPS has proven the excellent quality of its training and
instruction through the many awards received at competitive horse
shows throughout the area.
4) EPS provides employment for private citizens and is not a burden
on the taxpayers of the city.
S) EPS is an irreplaceable facility in terms of location, and its
loss would cause hardship to many who cannot utilize stables located
far out in the countryside.
----- ----------------------------------------------------------
-, YA y ��
LF
�. ?,/�4, -ZaG'I�.e►2.E�7� fit..A
w
r
1
WE, the undersigned, support the continued operation of Eden Prairie
Stables by the current management, and request that the City of Eden
Prairie provide a long-term lease and make requested improvements for
the following reasons :
1) EPS has proven itself to be a place where entire families can
enjoy the pleasures of horsemanship. It provides a special
recreational opportunity for many young people, who otherwise might
have many idle hours .
2) EPS provides an opportunity for young and old alike to improve
their skills and add to their knowledge of riding and horses .
3) EPS has proven the excellent quality of its training and
instruction through the many awards received at competitive horse
shows throughout the area.
4) EPS provides employment for private citizens and is not a burden
on the taxpayers of the city.
5) EPS is an irreplaceable facility in terms of location, and its
loss would cause hardship to many who cannot utilize stables located
far out in the countryside.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
/' " '- i
FA.
v
7 t 'r
\ r
d
WE, the undersigned, support the continued operation of Eden Prairie
Stables by the current management, and request that the City of Eden
Prairie provide a long-term lease and make requested improvements for
the following reasons:
1) EPS has proven itself to be a place where entire families can
enjoy the pleasures of horsemanship. It provides a special
recreational opportunity for many young people, who otherwise might
have many idle hours.
2) EPS provides an opportunity for young and old alike to improve
their skills and add to their knowledge of riding and horses.
3) EPS has proven the excellent quality of its training and
instruction through the many awards received at competitive horse
shows throughout the area.
4) EPS provides employment for private citizens and is not a burden
on the taxpayers of the city.
5) EPS is an irreplaceable facility in terms of location, and its
loss would cause hardship to many who cannot utilize stables located
far out in the countryside.
--------------------------------------------------------------
r
'a
C
a
rvn
• v
e. r
Arllo r
S4- (�,uL M t�
�>--r
. .
c-
WE , the undersigned, support the continued operation of Eden Prairie
Stables by the current management, and request that the City of Eden
Prairie provide a long-term lease and make requested improvements for
the following reasons :
1) EPS has proven itself to be a place where entire families can
enjoy the pleasures of horsemanship. It provides a special
recreational opportunity for many young people, who otherwise might
have many idle hours.
2) EPS provides an opportunity for young and old alike to improve
their skills and add to their knowledge of riding and horses.
3) EPS has proven the excellent quality of its training and
instruction through the many awards received at competitive horse
shows throughout the area.
4) EPS provides employment for private citizens and is not a burden Y
on the taxpayers of the city.
5) EPS is an irreplaceable facility in terms of location, and its
loss would cause hardship to many who cannot utilize stables located
far out in the countryside.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Jo
'A
527
c '
7 w
L
L
Y
1
r ,r-
r
a' rs
�.
✓' .GXr.fi