Loading...
City Council - 09/25/1972 - Village Meeting • MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL Monday, September 25, 1972 7.30 P.M. , High school Cafetorium Members present ,vere: Mayor Paul R. Redpath, Councilmen Nesbitt, t Cosmano and McCulloch and Councilwoman Joan Meyers . Also present were Village Manager, Robert P. Heinrich, Village Attorney, W. Harlan Perbix, Clerk, Edna M. Holmgren, Finance Director, John D. Frane, Assessor, Kenneth ;,%/ . Chambers and Engineering Asst. , Eugene Pchurman. I. TRUNK SEWER AND TRUNK HATER A"^ESSMENT HEARING The Mayor opened the hearing, then the Village Manager reviewed and presented language and graphics for both the sewer and water trunks. He presented trunk system costs and expected revenue, also rates and charges contained in Resolution No. 425 and Resolution No. 568 amending No. 425 . He then reviewed the resolution on policy position on financing sewer and water utilities. The Mayor then asked for questions and/or comments from the floor. Dave Osterholt, former mayor,asked for a reason for changing policy on trunk charges, the omission from the original policy of a provision for deferred payments to owners of property assessed only for trunk benefit. He stated that the Council had adopted this policy a year ago and they felt it was a good policy. The Mayor replied that the staff recommended the amendments as the only feasible rreans of financing the system. Mr. Osterholt added that he was still concerned about the burden on elderly residents who live on a fixed income . The Village Manager replied that a state law prevents deferral of payments for the elderly. Mr. Osterholt then stated that he felt that there are alternate Nays to finance trunk sewers and thought that the Council should consider other plans . Mr. Loren Irvine stated that he felt the residents were subsidizing future developer's projects by providing a deferral of assessment on tracts that developers plan to plat, subdivide or connect to the system at a later date, up to 1977. Mr. Jerry Miller, Larry Hanson, and Howard Kaerwer, all in Topview Acres , felt that the amendment was not fair to the owner of five to eight acres of land. Mr. Miller charged that the amendment could force people to develop their land, also added that apartment dwellers should have to pay the full R£C charge. The Village Manager expressed the Council's concern for the owner of several acres who came to the Village in hooes of having lance around them and did not plan to subdivide. He further stated that because of development and land costs, the Village has no real aiteniative but to assess on possible eventual use. He stressed that the policy actually shifts the burden from the single REC to future development. Council Meeting September 25 , 1972 Page Two Mrs. Arthur Rogers appeared on behalf of her mother, Mrs. Julia A. Kicher, 16817 West 62nd Street, Eden Prairie , -who is the owner of parcel #2400 and 103220 in Section 5 . `"he stated that she felt no deter- mination of benefit to these properties had been made and that it should be eliminated from the assessment at this time. The Mayor stated that he felt she was ma::ing an unwise request but that the Council would take it into consideration at the time of their decision . Joseph Dolejsi requested how many housing starts the Village has had, the Manager replied that there had been less than 100 per year and that there would have to be 2,500 annually to finance the utilities. A Kirg's Forest resident asked what would happen if the Village didn't get the 2 ,500 RrC's as projected. The Manager replied that the user fees would be raised or by mill levy. Dave Osterholt as%ed about ways of financing utilities other than trunk charges. Finance Director, John Frane , stated that there were many ways of financing, system access charges was one but that any of them were risky other than assessment. Ile stated that he felt that the Village was ta,cing the middle course. Mrs. Russell Lawrence , Sunnybrook Road, stated that she felt the Village was doing a good job of planning, not like the surrounding suburbs which have grown hodge podge . the stated that population growth was moving towards Eden Prairie and that there were few areas left that could plan as Eden Prairie has done . .She further stated that the area must have sewer and water to avoid pollution. Don Peterson, President of Edenvale Corp. , stated that the home owners were not subsidizing the multiple dwelling and that the developers would be frontending all trunk charges. There being no further comments from the floor, Mr. Cosmano made a motion to continue the hearing on trunk sewer and water assessment until the regular October 10th Council meeting. Mr. Nesbitt seconded. All votes aye. Motion carried. i a II. LATERAL SEWER AND -1ATER ASSESSMENT - PARADISE VALLEY. r Resolution No. 5 82 . Proiect S71-1-16 and 571-7-16 and W71-2-16 and W71-8-16. The Manager reviewed and presented the lateral sewer and water assess- ment project in Paradise Valley. f Council Meeting September 25, 1972 Page Three There being no questions and/or comments, Mr. Nesbitt made a motion to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 582 approving assess- ments in Paradise Valley as follows: Developed Lot Undeveloped Lot Lateral ater 473 631 Lateral E ewer 1, 780 2 ,374 2 ,253 3 , 005 Mrs. Meyers seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried. III. LATERAL QVATER AND -AfATER ASSESSMENT - THE COVE. Resolution No. 583. Project S70-1-19. The Manager reviewed and presented the lateral sewer and water assess- ment project in The Cove. There being no questions and/or comments, Mr. Cosmano made a motion to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 583 approving assess- ments in The Cove as follows: Developed Lot Undeveloped Lot Lateral fie-wer 1,224 1 ,633 i Mr. Nesbitt seconded. On roll call, all voted aye . Motion carried. 6 TV. ,LATERAL SEWER AND WATER ASSESSMENT - TOPVIEW ACRES. Resolution No. 534. Protect S71-1-24 and 671-7-24 and ti1J71-2-24. The Manager reviewed and presented the lateral sewer and water assess- ment project in Topview Acres. A resident from this area questioned how the cost is computed when the job is not completed. The Finance Director stated that he felt that all costs had been taken into considera- tion and that if the assessment were delayed , it would cause an increase_ in cost to the property owner because of additional interest expense for another year. Councilman Nesbitt asked why the REC's were not the same for seiArer and .,vater. Mr. Frane replied that some of them were hooked directly into the trunks. There being no further comments and/or questions, Mrs. Meyers made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 584 approving lateral sewer and water assessments in Topview Acres as follows: Developed Lot Undeveloped Lot Lateral Water 551 734 Lateral Sewer 1 ,284 1 ,712 1,836 2 ,446 Mr. McCulloch seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried. Council Meeting September 25 , 1972 Page Four V. LATERAL SAVER AND 'AIATER EDEN VIE%V 2ND. . P,esolutio No. 585 . Project S'71-1-16 and 571-7-16 and �t171-2- 16 and 0f71-0-1G. T'ae Manager reviewed and presented the lateral sewer and water assess- ment project in Eden View II. A resident from the area asked if all of the pipe was installed for the water. The Village Engineer replied that it was but that the easement for the pipe to carry the water was some ,,rays away. A resident on Eden Prairie Road in the area of two homes not being served at this time asked when utilities would be available. The Manager stated that no plans were being made at this time for installa- tion. t There being no further questions and/or comments, Mr. Nesbitt made a { motion to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 585 approving lateral sewer and •-eater assessments in Eden View iI as follows: Developed Lot Undeveloped Lot 9 Lateral 'Hater 547. 729 Lateral newer 1 ,540 2 ,053 2 , 087 2 ,782 Mr. Cosmano seconded . On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried . i i VT. LATERAL SE'j%fER AND !�rATER ASSESSMENT - NOTTINGHAM FOREST. Resolution No. 586 . Project 572-1-10 and `e'I72-2-10 . The Manager reviewed and presented the lateral sewer and water assess- ment project in Nottingham Forest. e I There being no questions or comments, Mr. Cosmano made a motion to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 586 approving lateral sever and water assessments in Nottingham Forest as follows: Developed Lot Undeveloped Lot Lateral 'iAfater 6 i 5 926 Lateral Sewer 1 , 899 2 ,533 2 ,594 3 ,459 Mr. McCulloch seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried. VII. LATERAL SEL.NER AND ;AIATER ASSESS IVENT - EDEN SCHOOL. Resolution_ No. 587. Project 571-1-18 and 571-2-18. The Manager reviewed and presented the lateral sewer and water assess- ment project in the Eden School area. A resident on Eden Court (, questioned whether the school and property owners on Wallace Road were paying their share of the assessments. The Manager replied that they were. Council Meeting September 25 , 1972 E Page Five There being no further questions or comments, Mrs. Meyers made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 587 approving lateral sewer and water assessment project in the Eden School Addition as follows: Developed Lot Undeveloped Lot Lateral `,hater 688 917 Lateral 5 ewer 1 ,292 1 , 723 1 , 980 2, 640 Mr. Nesbitt seconded_ On roll call , all voted aye . Motion carried. VIII. LATERAL SMVIM AND "%-rATER ASSESSMENT - ALFiNE, HILLCR EST, ED . AT_QOD_ ESTH ERHILLS, £T AL. Resolution No . 588. Proiect S71- 1-20 and P71-7-20 and :-V71-2-20 and W71-8-20. The Manager reviewed and presented the lateral sewer and water assess- ment project in the Alpine, Hillcrest, Wenc,rood, and Estherhills areas. A resident living on Alpine Trail questioned why there were 1/3 REC's included in their project. The Manager replied that there was some double bungalo%a type housing in this area assessed at 1-1/3 REC's, some to trunk sever and some to trunk ;water. There being no further questions or comments, Mr. Nesbitt made a motion to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 588 approving lateral sewer and water assessment project in the Alpine, Hillcrest, at al area as follows: Developed Lot Undeveloped Lot Lateral 'A ater 546 728 Lateral Sewer 1 ,429 1 , 905 1 , 975 2,633 Mr. McCulloch seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried. e UC. LATERAL SEWER AND .VATER ASSESSIMENT - K?NG'S FOREST, FOREr-T s KNOLLS. Resolution No. 589. Project S71-1-23 and S71-7-23 and 571-1-27 and S72-1-07 and S72-1- 14 and S72-1-15 and S72-1-16 and W71-2-23 and �,:771-8-23 and VN71-2-27 and If72-2-07 and W72-2-14 and W72-2-15 and Af72-2-16 . The Manager reviewed and presented the lateral sewer and water assess- ment project in the King's Forest-Forest Knolls area. There being no questions or comments, a motion was made to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 589 approving lateral sewer and water assessment project in the King's Forest-Forest Knolls area as follows: Developed Lot Undeveloped Lot Lateral Ulater 665 887 Lateral ._ewer 1 ,804 2 ,406 2 ,469 3,293 { Mrs. Meyers seconded . On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried. Council Meeting September 25, 1972 Page Six X. LATERAL SE`dITER AND I:�ATER AcSFSSMEN`)' - DUCK LAKE AREA. Resolution No. 590. Project S7I-1-17 and S71-7-17 and W71-2-17 and vV71-8-17. The Manager revie-r,red and presented the lateral sewer and water assess- ment project in the Duck Lake area. The Manager read a letter received from Mrs. Arthur Rogers requesting deletion of her mother's property. Mr. McCulloch asked what this deletion would do to the cost of the N project. The Village Engineering Assistant stated that they would have to construct a force main. John Frane commented that by excluding this portion -would add $10 more per R EC. j A representative of the King of Glory Lutheran Church on Duck Lake rail questioned ho�v many REC's were assigned to this property. Ken Chambers replied that there were two. Dave Jensen, residing in Coachlight Manor, asked when he could connect. The Manager replied that it would be sometime in the middle of November this year. Dave Husby, Rieke Carroll & Muller Associates, was asked what the Y estimated cost difference would be in putting in a lift station on '*!Nest 168th Avenue by deleting Mrs . Julia IGucher's property in Section S . He felt that this could be assessed in the trunk lateral. A resident in Sterling Field questioned when the streets would be black- topped, when a resident could hook up on Duck Lake Trail, and whether the pipe was large enough on Duck Lal:e Trail to handle the new developments that are being proposed. Mr. Husby replied that the first mat would be completed this fall, they could hook up on Duck Lake Trail by November 15th and that the 10" pipe was large enough to accommodate the Duct; Lake area. Another resident questioned ;r7hy the cost was more in the Duck Lake area, he ;.vas told that it is a very difficult area to serve plus less REC' s. Don Rogers, Dunk Lake Trail, questioned why the streets were not all ulacktopped when the utility work was finished. The Manager stated that the policy was set to restore to the original condition of the streets. Mrs. Meyers asked what difference there would be in the plans if the Kucher property ,sere deleted and v%rhat maintenance cost there would be. Mr. Husby stated that there would have to be a lift station to push to Duck Lake Trail and that only pump service would be required . There being no further questions or comments, Mrs. Meyers made a motion to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 590 approving i Council Meeting September 25, 1972 Page Seven a lateral sewer and water assessment project in the Duck Lake area deleting parcels 2400 and 3220 in Section 5 as follows: Develo ep d Lot Undeveloped Lot_ Lateral Water 760 1,013 Lateral !"ewer 2 , 017 2 ,689 2 , 777 3 , 702 Mr. McCulloch seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried. i The meeting adjourned at 11:45 p.m. Edna M. Holmgren, C1 rk r I a