Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 77-93 - Requesting Tax Commissioner to Correct Assessment Inequities - 08/02/1977 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 77-93 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE STATE TAX COMMISSIONER TO CORRECT ASSESSMENT INEQUITIES WHEREAS, the equitable assessment of real property values is absolutely essential in order that taxes levied by governmental units which transcend municipal and county boundaries will be fair, and WHEREAS, studies prepared by the State of Minnesota Department of Revenue show that there is great disparity among the seven counties in the metropolitan area, with the 1976 sales assessment ratio study of residential properties showing, for example, that Hennepin County's limited value ratio was 84.4%, and its market value ratio was 96.3%, while Anoka County's limited value ratio was 89.5% and its market value ratio was 92.7%, and at the low end were Scott County's 73.9% limited value ratio and Dakota County's 81 .5% market value ratio, and WHEREAS, 1973 legislation limited current year assessments for selective property classes to a 5% increase in the preceding assessment valuation, and a 1975 amendment provided that all property classes were limited to an increase in valuation for 1975 and subsequent years of 10% of the previous valuation, or 25% of the • difference between the current estimated market value and previous years' limited market value whichever is greater, and WHEREAS, the introduction of "limited" market value greatly complicates the problems of securing equitable assessments,- and WHEREAS, the authority of municipal and county boards of review to make overall changes in values is severely limited by statute, and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota constitutes the State Board of Equalization and is empowered to reduce wide disparities in assessment levels between counties, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota be requested to take immediate action to secure a uniform level of assessment among the seven counties in the metropolitan area by raising assessment levels in Carver, Scott, Dakota, Ramsey and Washington Counties, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the attention of the members of the House and Senate representing Eden Prairie be called to this entire problem with the request that they make every effort possible to secure whatever changes are necessary in the "limited value" statutes so that application of this feature will not hinder the establishment of a uniform level of assessment, and Resolution No. 77-93 Page Two j BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that cities in Hennepin and Anoka Counties and the Hennepin and Anoka County Boards of Commissioners be urged to make similar requests to the Commissioner of Revenue and to their respective legislators ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on this 2na day of August 1977. C fgaVgqH Penzel , Mayor SEAL ATTEST: Joh . Frane, ty Clerk n AGGREGATE SALES-ASSESSMENT RATIO INDICATED MARKET VALUE 1974 1975 1976 Res. Res. County Aggregate Indicated Wide Ratio Mkt Lmtd Mkt Lmtd Mkt ANOKA 88.0* 88.0** 88.9*** 88.9 93.2 89.5 92.7 CARVER 77.2* 79.0** 78.8*** 81.5 90.9 75.8 81.9 DAKOTA 79.3* 80.7** 80.9*** 81.8 85.8 80.2 81.5 HENNEPIN 88.1* 88.3** 89.3*** 89.6 96.2 84.4 96.3 RAMSEY 72.8* 72.7** 74.4*** 74.4 86.1 74.7 86.7 SCOTT 74.1* 75.2** 73.9*** 74.7 91.4 73.9 88.6 • WASHINGTON 74.5* 76.3** 76.4*** 78.6 83.2 77.9 86.2 EDINA 92.1* 92•.1** 93.8*** 93-8 97.7 94.6 97.1 Eden Prairie 88.3 88.6 92.3 92.3 96.4 90.6 96.8 STATE - - 80.9(p 114) - - - - * Table 1 - 1974 Ratio Study, Department of Revenue ** Table 2 - 1974 Ratio Study, Department of Revenue *** Table 1 - 1975 Ratio 'Study, Department of Revenue **** Table 2 - 1975 Ratio STudy, Department of Revenue *ASSESSMENT UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSION 1956 1968 1970 1972 1973 1974 1975 ANOKA - Residential . 8 9.4 11.6 0.1 9.5 9.7 9.7 CARVER - Residential 21 16.6 16.6 13.4 15.8 15.2 12.6 DAKOTA - Residential 15 10.7 12.5 10.9 11.6 .11.5 11.8 HENNEPIN - Residential 9 10.1 11.2 9.6 10.0 10.8 10.8 RAMSEY - Residential 9 16.8 14.0 13.2 13.2 13.3 13.6 SCOTT - Residential 14 17.1 15.6 14.9 15.5 16.6 15.3 WASHINGTON - Residential 20 13.3 15.3 13.7 13.7 14.2 11.6 Excellent - 1.0 - 9.9 Reasonable - 10.0 - 19.9 Questionable - 20.0 - 29.9 Unacceptable - 30iO & Over. * p. 201 1975 Ratio Study, Department of Revenue