HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 02/14/2017 APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2017 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad
Aho, Sherry Butcher Wickstrom, Ron Case, and
Kathy Nelson
CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Public Works Director
Robert Ellis, Community Development Director
Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay
Lotthammer, City Engineer Rod Rue, City Attorney
Ric Rosow, and Council Recorder Jan Curielli
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Tyra-Lukens called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. All Council Members were
present.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. OPEN PODIUM INVITATION
IV. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS
A. ACCEPT DONATION FROM PARK DENTAL EDEN PRAIRIE FOR
CONCERT SERIES (RESOLUTION NO. 2017-21)
Lotthammer said this is a donation from Park Dental Eden Prairie for the free
concert series at Staring Park. He noted contributions from groups such as Park
Dental enable Eden Prairie to offer such events.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Aho, to adopt Resolution No. 2017-21
accepting the $1,000 donation from Park Dental Eden Prairie towards the Starring
at Staring Concert Series. Motion carried 5-0.
B. ACCEPT LIONS CLUB DONATION FOR OUTDOOR CENTER
(RESOLUTION NO. 2017-22)
Lotthammer said the Lions Club is another organization that continues to sponsor
events. The Staring Lake Outdoor Center hosts classes and events for all ages,
including several programs with school children. The Outdoor Center provides
water studies programs with elementary school students, and this is a $400
donation from the Lions Club to purchase water testing equipment for the
Outdoor Center.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 14, 2017
Page 2
MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to adopt Resolution
No. 2017-22 accepting the gift in the amount of$400 from the Eden Prairie Lions
Club for the purchase of water testing equipment for the Staring Lake Outdoor
Center. Motion carried 5-0.
C. ACCEPT BUSH FOUNDATION GRANT FOR$5,000 FOR CITY'S
RECEIPT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LOCAL
GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AWARD
Ellis said, as announced at the January 3, 2017, City Council meeting, the City of
Eden Prairie was the University of Minnesota's overall city category winner of
the 2016 Local Government Innovation Award for the invention of the Vacuum
Dredge Box (VDB). With this award comes a $5,000 grant from the Bush
Foundation. The $5,000 grant will be used to help purchase a small tracked skid
steer that is used in the operation of the VDB.
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Nelson, to accept the Bush
Foundation grant of$5,000 in recognition of the City's receipt of the University
of Minnesota Local Government Innovation Award. Motion carried 5-0.
V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Case, to approve the agenda as published. Motion
carried 5-0.
VI. MINUTES
A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,JANUARY 3, 2017
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Aho, to approve the minutes
of the City Council workshop held Tuesday, January 3, 2017. Motion carried 5-0.
B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,JANUARY 17, 2017
MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Case, to approve the minutes of the City
Council meeting held Tuesday, January 17, 2017, as published. Motion carried 5-
0.
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2017-23 AUTHORIZING MINNESOTA
WATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK (MnWARN) MUTUAL AID
AGREEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 14, 2017
Page 3
C. AWARD CONTRACT TO KEYS WELL DRILLING TO SERVICE WELL 15
D. AWARD CONTRACT TO BERGERSON CASWELL TO SERVICE WELL 16
E. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2017-24 CORRECTING RESOLUTION NO. 99-
215 VACATION OF A PORTION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 11, BLOCK 5, EDENVALE 6
ADDITION (14215 GREENVIEW COURT)
F. APPROVE CONTRACT WITH INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES USA,
LLC FOR INSPECTION, CLEANING,AND REHABILITATION OF
WOODLAND/SUNSHINE DR. STORMWATER SEWER
G. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2017-25 APPROVING COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
TRAIL ON VALLEY VIEW RD. FROM 9977 VALLEY VIEW TO
WASHINGTON AVE. S.
H. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 FOR SOUTHERN SEGMENT OF
SHADY OAK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
I. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR WEST 70TH ST. EXTENSION
J. APPROVE CITY'S PURCHASING POLICY
K. AWARD CONTRACT FOR MILLER PARK OUTDOOR HOCKEY RINK
REPLACEMENT TO FINLEY BROS, INC.
L. AWARD CONTRACT FOR ROUND LAKE TENNIS COURT RESURFACING
TO FINLEY BROS. INC.
M. AMEND PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH WEITZMAN
STUDIOS, INC. FOR FABRICATION OF BRIDGE PIER FORM LINERS
N. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2017-26 REGARDING PURCHASE OF TAX
FORFEITED PROPERTIES
O. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2017-27 AUTHORIZING PREPAYMENT OF
LEASE AND REDEMPTION OF OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
P. APPROVE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY
TO FURTHER GOALS OF THE GREEN LINE EXTENSION AND
SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK
Q. APPROVE RENEWAL OF THE TOWING SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH MATT'S AUTO SERVICE
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 14, 2017
Page 4
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Aho, to approve Items A-G and I-Q on the
Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0.
MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to approve Item H on
the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0-1, with Case abstaining.
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
A. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER
11 RELATING TO CELL TOWERS AND ANTENNAS
Getschow said the Federal Communication Commission Act of 1996 established
that antennas and cell towers are a permitted use in all cities and may not be
discriminated against by zoning districts established in cities. To accommodate this
new mandate, the Eden Prairie City Code was amended in 1996 to permit antennas
and towers in all zoning districts. Since that time the City has added a few more
zoning districts including Town Center(TC), Airport Commercial (A-C), Airport
Office (A-OFC) and Golf Courses (GC). This is a housekeeping item to add the
provision for antennas and cell towers as a permitted use in those additional zoning
districts. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the
amendment at the January 9, 2017 meeting.,
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Case, to close the public hearing, and to
approve first reading of the ordinance amending City Code Section 11.27, 11.28,
11.29 and 11.36 relating to antennas and towers as a permitted use in the Town
Center, Airport Commercial, Airport Office and Golf Course Zoning Districts.
Case said he assumed that FAA rules would preempt anything the City might do.
Getschow replied that was correct.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried 5-0.
B. BANEBERRY HOLLOW REASSESSMENT (RESOLUTION NO. 2017-28)
Getschow said on October 19, 2010, the City Council approved the levying of a
Special Assessment of$287.01 for tall grass/weed contract removal on Lot 11,
Block 1, Baneberry Hollow, the parcel containing driveways and open space for the
Baneberry Hollow Homeowners Association. The levy was certified to the 2011
property taxes, however, the taxes were not paid. Hennepin County and the Eden
Prairie City Attorney have determined that,per the provisions of Minnesota State
Statue Chapter 51513, the property of Lot 11, Block 1, Baneberry Hollow, is a
"common element" parcel which may not be specially assessed. Instead, any special
assessments must be evenly divided over the"units," those lots containing dwellings,
of the Baneberry Hollow Homeowners Association. All other aspects of the
assessment—interest rate of 5.25% and repayment period of one (1) year as
established in Resolution 2010-70 -- will remain the same.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 14, 2017
Page 5
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to close the public hearing,
and to adopt Resolution No. 2017-28 approving the Baneberry Hollow reassessment.
Case asked if the ten individual lots impacted by the assessment have been notified
and if there have been any complaints. Ellis replied the Baneberry Hollow
Homeowners Association did not mow the weeds, so the amount of the tall grass/weed
removal was assessed back to the common property. After we researched the statutes,
we found we cannot assess the common property,rather it must be assessed to the
individual units. The City has not added interest to the amount. The property owners
impacted were noticed of the hearing tonight. He said there have been no complaints
about mowing the lot since 2010.
Nelson asked if this will impact how we treat other associations that have common
property. Rosow said it will, and common property will be treated in this fashion
going forward.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried 5-0.
X. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Case, to approve the payment of
claims as submitted. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Aho, Butcher
Wickstrom, Case, Nelson and Tyra-Lukens voting "aye."
XI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. APPROVE FIRST AND SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCE NO. 1-2017
AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 6.03 RELATING TO CITY
LICENSING OF TELECOMMUNICATION RIGHT-OF-WAY USERS
Ellis said Chapter 6.03 of City Code allows for the use of any City-owned public
utility structure in the public right-of-way for placement of commercial wireless
telecommunication facilities, such as antennas, by telecommunications companies.
This amendment will require the telecommunications companies to enter into a
license agreement for placement of the telecommunication facility in any public
structure. It spells out a lot of details that really don't belong in a City ordinance.
We have a number of these telecommunication facilities on the utility structures
now, and we have license agreements for those structures. We do expect there will
be an influx of others.
Case asked if there is any bonding piece included in the license. Ellis replied he did
not believe the licensing agreements have that in the agreement. The license will be
issued annually, and we would take down the equipment and return it to the
company if necessary when a company did not renew the license.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 14, 2017
Page 6
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to approve first and
second readings of Ordinance No. 1-2017 amending City Code Section 6.03
relating to City licensing of telecommunication right-of-way users. Motion
carried 5-0.
XII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
XIII. APPOINTMENTS
XIV. REPORTS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
C. REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
1. Receive Feasibility Report and Direct Staff to Include Utility
Improvements with Eden Prairie Road Street and Utility
Improvements (Resolution No. 2017-29)
City Engineer Rod Rue said this would normally be a Consent Calendar
item,but, due to the nature of the project, staff will present a summary of
the feasibility report as a separate item. He said the feasibility study for the
southern portion of Eden Prairie Road was authorized by the Council in
June of 2013. In June of 2015 the City Council authorized a feasibility study
for utility improvements to serve the Lions Tap site and adjoining parcel,
based on a petition received from property owners. The feasibility study
addresses providing sanitary sewer and water utility connection options to
serve the commercial restaurant site and adjoining rural property. The
Metropolitan Council and Eden Prairie City Council have previously
approved serving the Lion's Tap site with city utilities since the restaurant
site is outside the Met Council's Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA)
line. Since the two projects (Eden Prairie Road and Lions Tap utilities) are
interconnected, these projects need to be combined into one project.
Rue gave a PowerPoint presentation describing the four options considered
for the street and utility improvements and summarizing the costs for each
of the options. He said Option 4 is the recommended option. That option
would include a gravity system for the utilities and would be routed around
the existing right-of-way so there would be no need for easements. The lift
station would be located on the west side of Lions Tap. He said the cost of
this option would be $1,730,000, the least costly of the four options and also
the most reliable.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 14, 2017
Page 7
Rue said the Eden Prairie Road Extension to Flying Cloud Drive Street and
Utility Feasibility Report is expected to be received by the City Council at
the March 7, 2017 City Council meeting, and a Public Hearing date will be
set, probably for April 4, 2017. The report will describe the proposed
combined street and utility improvements, the estimated project costs, and
the methodology used to calculate the assessments for the benefitting
properties. Prior to the public hearing, we would schedule a neighborhood
meeting(s) to discuss the feasibility report and proposed assessments. At the
April 4th public hearing, we will be requesting that the City Council order
the combined improvements.
Tyra-Lukens asked if there is some issue we are missing about selecting
Option 4 if that option is the cheapest and probably the most effective and
reliable. Rue replied the gravity system used in Option 4 is more reliable
and is what people are used to dealing with in most areas of the City. The
low pressure systems used in the other options do exist in some areas of the
City; however, the grinder station for that type of system requires the
property owner to own and maintain it, so there can be some replacement
and maintenance issues.
Case said the Notermann's came before the City Council a few years ago
and discussed some pre-zoning for development of their property. He asked
if they might, therefore, be more interested in having easement access
included as part of the development agreement as would be provided by
Options 2 and 3. Rue replied the City has been discussing the improvements
to the Lions Tap site with the Notermann's and their representatives. He
noted Spring Road is being realigned as part the County's CSA No. 61
reconstruction project. As part of the realignment, a remnant piece of right-
of-way will be sold to Lions Tap so they will have additional acreage.
A representative of the Notermann's, said Option 4 is the Notermann's
preferred option and would provide more of an opportunity to spread the
assessments over the property.
Dean Edstrom, 10133 Eden Prairie Road, said Options 2 and 3 would
disrupt his property, and he thought Option 4 was the best option.
MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Case, to adopt Resolution No.
2017-29 to receive the feasibility report and to direct staff to include the
recommended Lions Tap utility improvements (Option No. 4) into the
Eden Prairie Road extension to Flying Cloud Drive street and utility
improvements. Motion carried 5-0.
F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF
G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 14, 2017
Page 8
H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
1. ERS Estates Lake Access and Dock Appeal
Rosow said in 2016 the City received a request from the owner of the
property at 12551 Beach Circle to confirm that the non-conforming use of a
second dock serving property not abutting the lake remained as a protected
non-conforming use. After conferring with the City Attorney, City staff
provided a determination to ERS Development LLC (the property owner)
that the non-conforming use status of the easement had been lost due to the
discontinuance of use. ERS Development LLC then filed an appeal of that
determination. At the December 12, 2016 meeting, the Planning
Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals,held a public
meeting on the appeal of the staff determination. After hearing information
presented by staff, the appellant, and nearby property owners, the
Commission voted on a 5-2 vote to direct staff to prepare findings and an
order upholding staff s determination. On January 12, 2017, an appeal of the
Planning Commission determination was filed.
Rosow said the provision of the Minnesota statutes that deals with non-
conforming uses states that a legal non-conforming use can be continued,
improved, replaced and repaired unless the occupancy is discontinued for a
period of more than one year. Eden Prairie's City Code contains the same
provision. hi 2005 the City Code was amended to be consistent with the
provision in State law with respect to when a use would be considered to be
discontinued. Before the code amendment in 2005, the standard for non-
conforming use was intent to abandon. The current provision regarding non-
conforming use has been upheld in several cases around the State.
Rosow said the property is located off the lake and, since 1965,has had a
20-foot easement to the lake across another property that abuts the lake. In
2005 a new owner, Dr. Elmer Salovich, purchased the property. The issue is
whether there was a discontinuance of the non-conforming use and whether
the position of the City planner was correct. Mr. Paradis, the owner of the
property that the easement is across, testified before the Planning
Commission at one point that he removed the dock from the easement more
than ten years ago after asking the previous owner to remove the dock as it
was in a state of disrepair after it had been crushed by winter ice. That came
as news to the new owner of the subject property. The issue for the City,
however, is not who removed the dock from the lake but rather it is whether
there was a discontinuance. The evidence showed the dock was not put back
in over the ten-year time period from 2006 to 2016.
Rosow said Dr. Salovich, the owner of ERS Development, states that, in
2006 after he acquired this property, he applied to replat the property. The
staff report on the re-platting of the property notes the non-conforming use
and states it may continue. Dr. Salovich's argument is that he was not told
by City staff he would have to maintain the dock in the lake every year. That
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 14, 2017
Page 9
argument caused two of the Planning Commission members to vote against
the staff recommendation. Rosow said Mr. Beck, the attorney for ERS
Development, argues that, in a duplex situation, you couldn't lose the non-
conforming use when the house was remodeled. However, the City's
position is that use of the dock is what is non-conforming. In his letter of
February 8, Mr. Beck argues that this is an issue of intent to abandon, and
no dock was put in because there was no need for one while the renovation
was going on.
Rosow noted the easement did not provide for storage of the dock.
Peter Beck, representing Dr. Salovich and ERS Development, said the right
of easement was given in 1964, and Dr. Salovich bought the property in
November of 2005. The issues that have emerged are whether Dr. Salovich
should have put the dock in every year during the time of renovation and
whether City staff told him about the new requirement regarding
discontinuance of use. He noted it does make a difference if the dock was
taken out by someone else. The only recourse they could follow was to
appeal the decision by the Planning Commission because it will make it
difficult to sell the property.
Tyra-Lukens asked if Mr. Beck made the statement that it is significant
whether the dock was removed or stolen. Mr. Beck said he did and asked
how the use could be discontinued if someone else stole the dock. Tyra-
Lukens then asked if the non-conforming use is the existence of the dock or
the easement allowing the dock. Rosow replied the non-conforming use is
the second dock on the lake property. The ordinance allows only one dock
per lot. The non-conforming use was created when there were two docks,
but in this case one dock was discontinued for more than one year.
Nelson asked if we have rules about keeping a dock in good repair. Rosow
said we don't have rules that deal with maintenance of a dock, and that is
not covered by our exterior maintenance code.
Dr. Elmer Salovich, 12551 Beach Circle, said the dock that was on the
property was made of steel and was not in need of repair. He said he did a
lot of improvements on the house and told staff he was not putting in a dock
because he had to renovate the house first. He also asked staff if Eden
Prairie has some requirements about docks, and staff told him that Eden
Prairie does not have a specific ordinance for docks and follows the
Minnesota State requirements. Staff told him to come and see them when he
was ready to put in a dock and did not tell him about any time constraints to
put in a dock.
Rosow said Mr. Beck asked why, of the two docks, this dock would be
considered the non-conforming one, and noted that dispute would be
between the two property owners. He reviewed the options available for the
City Council to make a decision.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 14, 2017
Page 10
Case said this situation reminds him of past discussions by the Council
about billboards in the City. When the ordinance against billboards was
passed, we grandfathered in the use of existing billboards even though we
did not want them in the City. In this case, we don't want to have two docks
on each parcel around our lakes. The moment someone walks away from a
non-conforming use of a dock, that non-conforming use goes away. The
dock would have been grandfathered in if the dock had stayed there, but it
didn't. He said he will not vote for continuance of the non-conforming use.
Butcher Wickstrom agreed with Council Member Case and said it is a
question of consistency.
Nelson was bothered that the owner came in to talk to staff about when he
could put in a dock. He got a response from the staff that he could put in a
dock again, and that is what he went away with.
Aho agreed with Council Member Nelson that we need to apply the
ordinance fairly across all properties; however, it is not a fair application of
the ordinance if City staff tells someone to come back when he is ready to
put in a dock after he has asked staff what must be done to continue the use
of the dock, and then when he does come back he is told he can't continue to
use it. He said he would vote in favor of the property owner.
Jeremiah said the only documentation found about this situation is a staff
report from 2006 that says a dock is existing at the time and may continue;
however, the report assumes a dock was in place at the time of the report.
She said it is unclear who on staff had reviewed the situation, and there is no
documentation that the dock was there at the time. We said the dock could
continue here,but not that it could be abandoned or discontinued and then
come back to request the use be continued.
Case said we know that ignorance of the law is no excuse, and we hear a lot
of things that staff"claims." We have our rules and ordinances, and a
decision based on perception of how someone interpreted that would set a
dangerous precedent. We have an ordinance, and there is a reason we don't
allow two docks per parcel around the lakes. We allow certain docks to be
grandfathered in, but we get rid of the non-conforming uses as soon as they
are no longer there.
Aho said he could see if this were a new non-conforming use, but this is an
historical one that was already in existence. He thought that is different and
would not be setting a precedent.
Nelson said there is an expectation that an owner would maintain his
property rights, and it would be reasonable to expect someone to walk down
to the lake to see if the dock was there. It appears that was never done in this
situation.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 14, 2017
Page 11
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Case, to uphold the
determination of the Planning Commission that the non-conforming use of
a dock on Lot 8, Block 1, The Cove, for the benefit of Lot 2, Block 1 ERS
Estates, as a nonconforming legal use has terminated. Motion carried 4-1,
with Aho opposed.
XV. OTHER BUSINESS
XVI. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL LITIGATION
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to move to closed session.
Motion carried 5-0.
At 8:29 PM the Council moved to closed session.
XVII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to adjourn the meeting. Motion
carried 5-0. Mayor Tyra-Lukens adjourned the meeting at 9:17 PM.