HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/06/2014 APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2014 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad
Aho, Sherry Butcher Wickstrom, Ron Case, and
Kathy Nelson
CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Public Works Director
Robert Ellis, Community Development Director Janet
Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay
Lotthammer, City Attorney Ric Rosow, and Council
Recorder Jan Curielli
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Tyra-Lukens called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Council Member Case was
absent.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION
IV. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS
A. HUMAN RIGHTS AWARDS
Patricia Fenrick, Staff Liaison to the Human Rights and Diversity Commission,
said awards are presented in four award categories: individual, non-profit
organizations, business and youth. Sandra Filardo, Chair of the Human Rights and
Diversity Commission,presented the Individual award to Lynnea West. Chase
Carlson, Student Commissioner,presented the Business award to DSO
Architecture, represented by Dan O'Brien. Connie Iacovelli, Commission
Member, presented the Non-Profit Organization award to Baro Tutoring,
represented by Linda Bergman. Karena Lin, Student Commissioner, presented the
Youth award to Camila Merino.
B. PROCLAIM MAY 2014 TO BE SENIOR AWARENESS MONTH
Mayor Tyra-Lukens read a proclamation proclaiming May 2014 to be Senior
Awareness Month. A representative of the Senior Advisory Council thanked City
Council Members for their support.
V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 2
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Nelson, to approve the agenda as
published. Motion carried 4-0.
VI. MINUTES
A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,APRIL 22, 2014
MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to approve the minutes of
the Council workshop held Tuesday, April 22, 2014, as published. Motion carried
3-0-1, with Nelson abstaining.
B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,APRIL 22, 2014
MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to approve the minutes
of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, April 22, 2014, as published. Motion
carried 4-0.
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MAC DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 2 by Metropolitan Airports Commission.
Second Reading of Ordinance 12-2014 for Zoning District change from Rural to
Airport Office on 39 acres. Location: Flying Cloud Airport (Ordinance 12-2014
and Resolution No. 2014-45 Approving Summary Ordinance for Publication)
B. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL PERIOD TEXT AMENDMENT by
City of Eden Prairie. Second Reading of Ordinance 13-2014 to amend City Code
regarding the review approval and recording of preliminary and final plats.
(Ordinance No. 13-2014 and Resolution No. 2014-46 Approving Summary
Ordinance for Publication)
C. DIRECT STAFF TO NOT WAIVE THE MONETARY LIMITS ON
MUNICIPAL TORT LIABILITY ESTABLISHED BY MINNESOTA
STATUTES 466.04
D. ACCEPT PETITION AND SET HEARING FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND
FEES FOR EDENVALE HIGHLANDS HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA
E. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2014-47 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO NORTHWEST ASPHALT
COMPANY
F. AWARD CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF NEW
CONTROL ROOM VIDEO PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT TO AVI
SYSTEMS, INC.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 3
G. APPROVE LEASE BETWEEN CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND NGUYEN
LK,INC. FOR LOTUS NAILS AT 8018 DEN ROAD
H. AWARD CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES TO UPGRADE
RED ROCK SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION, I.C. 08-5731
I. APPROVE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH GRANT FOR
SOURCE WATER PROTECTION
J. AWARD CONTRACT FOR SUPPLY OF BITUMINOUS CRACKSEALANT
MATERIAL TO MIDSTATES EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY
K. APPROVE ADDITIONAL IN-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BUDGET
WITH SRF CONSULTING GROUP FOR NORTHERN SEGMENT OF
SHADY OAK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
L. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2014-48 APPROVING COOPERATIVE
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR SOUTHERN
SEGMENT OF SHADY OAK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
M. APPROVE ACQUISITION OF PARCEL 31 FOR SOUTHERN SEGMENT
OF SHADY OAK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
N. APPROVE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR FAIRWAY WOODS II
HIA
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Aho, to approve Items A-N of
the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0.
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
A. APPROVE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY
CODE SECTION 11.51, STANDARDS FOR PROTECTION OF WETLAND
Getschow said this ordinance comes about as a result of an audit conducted by the
Board of Water& Soil Resources. The revisions bring the wetland code up to date
with current State law and clarify process and procedures related to wetland
applications and review.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to close the public
hearing and to approve first reading of an ordinance amending City Code Section
11.51, Standards for Protection of Wetlands. Motion carried 4-0.
B. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-49 APPROVING PROPERTY TAX
ABATEMENT RELATED TO UPGRADES TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE
AQUATICS CENTER
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 4
Getschow said Items IX.B and C relate to the aquatics center upgrade. He said
Mr. Lotthammer will give an overview of the project before the public hearing and
discussion of debt and funding methods.
Lotthammer reviewed the action items along with the design process, schematics
of the proposed new aquatics center and funding methods. He distributed a
goldenrod handout with information about the bids received for the project. He
noted the financing methods were reviewed at the last City Council meeting. He
said the Parks Commission received a similar presentation at their meeting last
night. Construction management for the project will be done by RJM Construction
who will work with subcontractors on behalf of the City. He gave a PowerPoint
presentation that reviewed the history of the project and the design for Phases 1
and 2 of the project. He said the goal was to design an aquatics center that would
move forward for the next 30-40 years and one that would benefit the entire
community. There was a wide variety of community input in the building design.
Lotthammer reviewed the revenue and expenditure forecasts for the aquatics
center. The new amenities are expected to increase membership at the Community
Center, especially family memberships. There will be more revenue from classes
and rental time and increased concessions revenue. Expenses will be driven by the
increase in membership, additional classes and rentals and added operating
expenses. He said the popularity of the Community Center increased after the
upgrades were completed in 2008, making it one of the main cost recovery
amenities in the City. Phase 1 construction would start in June and would open in
March or April of 2015. At that time the current pool could be taken down, and
Phase 2 construction started. Phase 2 would finish in 2017.
Lotthammer reviewed the bid process and noted the total project cost of
$19,636,000 includes some of the alternates listed but not the portion of the
building including the waterslide. At their meeting last night, the Parks
Commission recommended approval of the project and also recommended
including the waterslide alternate in the project because it will be a major
attraction and the plunge pool that is part of the waterslide design could be used
for other purposes. The current cost of the waterslide portion of the design is about
$1,300,000. There would be cost efficiencies if that part of the design were to be
done at the same time as the rest of the building. He reviewed several of the
alternates included in the total cost, such as the upgraded diving boards, the
aquatic climbing wall and shallow depth pool amenities for younger children. Two
of the other alternates were not included in the total: the waterproofing under the
ceramic the and the aluminum ductwork at pool areas.
Lotthammer said at the last meeting the City Council directed staff to look harder
at the use of tax abatement bonds to finance the project. The public hearing for
approval of tax abatement bonds is scheduled for tonight. He said the use of tax
abatement bonds will involve putting the new debt in place of City debt that is
falling off. Funding through the use of tax abatement bonds would be $16-
17,000,000, with additional funds of$2.5-3,000,000 coming from the Capital
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 5
Improvement and Maintenance Fund. The Foxjets swim club has pledged to raise
$500,000 towards the new aquatics center.
Tyra-Lukens asked if the waterslide area could be shut off for safety reasons when
it was not manned. Lotthammer replied it could be shut off and State code requires
someone to be at the top and at the bottom of the slide when it is in use and also
sets a minimum height for users.
Nelson asked if we will hear from the bond people about the probable percentages
for interest. Lotthammer said when they gave their presentation two weeks ago
they gave us their best trends,but we don't know what the exact rates would be at
this point. The action tonight is to move forward to be in a position to sell those
bonds at a time when it is recommended to sell. The bond sale would come back at
another meeting. Nelson asked for a range of interest rates expected. Tammy
Omdal, Northland Securities, said the current estimated true interest cost is about
3.3%,based on a 20-year term;however that is an estimate until we actually go
out for bid. Getschow noted the interest rate would be lower in the beginning years
and would increase over the 20 year term.
Nelson asked if there will be plenty of space for adults and exercise classes in the
zero entry pool after the play area is put in. Lotthammer pointed out the area
planned for the play structures and noted that left plenty of area for the zero depth
entry.
Tyra-Lukens reviewed the rules for public input on the aquatics center expansion,
including a maximum speaking time of three minutes and the fact that questions
will be answered by staff at a later time.
James Sander, representing Hammargren-Meyer on behalf of Northland Concrete
& Masonry, asked the combined bid of Northland Concrete be accepted because
their base bid was lower by about$150,000 than the bid the City plans to accept.
Dan Kitrell, 15731 Summit Drive, said choosing to have a referendum on
financing the aquatics center is a policy decision, and he asked the Council to give
the residents of Eden Prairie a vote.
Steve Nelson, 16350 S. Hillcrest Court, spoke in favor of the aquatics center and
said he was content with not holding a referendum on this. He noted we have a
wonderful Community Center that we now have an opportunity to improve which
will make Eden Prairie an even better place to live.
Ryan Skogg, 10257 Nottingham Trail, said he is an Eden Prairie resident and a
Foxjets parent. He said the aquatics center expansion is about families, user groups
and senior access. He encouraged the Council to go ahead and build a facility that
will serve us for many years.
Tony Satterthwaite, 7109 Lanham Lane, said he is looking forward to what the
upgrade will do for the Community Center and commended the Council for their
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 6
financial management and prudence that puts us in the position where we can
afford to make this expenditure at this time. He was in strong support of the pool.
Bob Wagner, 7480 Hames Way, said he saw the public notice of the tax abatement
and asked what it means to his property ID. Getschow responded that it will not
affect his property.
Mark Davis, President of the Foxjet swim club, said he represents 1000 Eden
Prairie residents and 300 swimmers who have waited many years for a new
aquatics facility in the City. He said interest rates are at an historic low, as are
construction costs. It is time to move forward with the project. The Foxjets are
committed to raising money for the project, which will be a facility that will serve
the entire community.
Isabella Haeger, 16273 Mayfield Drive, said she is a sophomore at Eden Prairie
High School and is a member of the Foxjets and the High School Swim Team. She
said there are limitations at the current pool facilities. The updates will be
beneficial to many, not just the swim teams.
Jim Diehl, 10530 W Riverview Drive, noted there is an Aqua Jets facility nearby
that could be used for competitive swimming events. He encouraged having a
referendum on the financing of the center.
Kelly Boston, Head Coach of the Eden Prairie swim teams, said the Aqua Jets
facility is privately owned and her teams could not rent it. She thanked the Council
for considering the project.
MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to close the public
hearing. Motion carried 4-0.
Getschow said the idea of tax abatement bonds is that the City can grant tax
abatement to certain parcels in the City that would be used to construct public
infrastructure to provide service to residents. In reality this would be treated much
like our other debt, would be combined with our other debt, and would be levied
across the City. Abatement is the mechanism to accomplish that process. A
resident with one of the PID's listed would not be affected directly by this project
as the debt would be levied across the entire populace. Getschow said staff would
request that Section 4.03 of the resolution be slightly revised to set the amount not
to exceed to be $18,000,000.
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Aho, to adopt Resolution
2014-49 approving Property Tax Abatement related to upgrades to the Eden
Prairie Aquatics Center, with revision of Section 4.03 to set the not-to-exceed
amount at$18,000,000. Motion carried 4-0.
C. AWARD BIDS,ASSIGN CONTRACTS AND ENTER INTO A
GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE WITH RJM CONSTRUCTION FOR
THE AQUATICS EXPANSION PROJECT
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 7
Tyra-Lukens asked for a clarification of the bid situation brought up by Mr.
Sander, the first speaker during the public hearing. Rosow said he had a
conversation with Mr. Sander this afternoon and he disagreed with Mr. Sander.
Northland Concrete entered a combined bid for masonry and concrete but the
specifications called for separate bids for those two items. Separate bids were not
submitted by Northland Concrete on the two items, rather a combined bid was
submitted. A bidder would have a material advantage if it is only bid as a
combined item. He said it is very clear we cannot accept a bid that does not
conform with the requirement.
Nelson asked why only $2.5-3,000,000 would be taken from the Capital
Improvement Fund. Getschow said we have had some very positive years in terms
of revenue and expenditures throughout the City and transfer extra revenue to the
Capital Improvement Fund. We use that fund for one-time money towards one-
time items. It is the conservative estimate of staff that we could take $2.5-
3,000,000 out of the fund to put towards this project and still have funds to do the
capital improvements planned over the next 20 years. He thought we could
possibly go as high as $3.5-4,000,000,but anything over that we might want to
take a closer look at the 20-year capital improvement projects. We do feel very
confident with the $2.5-3,000,000 figure. Staff could do more analysis on the
$3.5-4,000,000 and come back with that analysis. We want to keep on the
trajectory of not needing to increase our tax levy or debt in order to fund all the
other projects in the City. Nelson said she would want to do at least$3,000,000.
Nelson said she understood why the Parks Commission recommended including
the waterslide portion of the aquatics center at this time but she felt torn on the
issue because of the $1,300,000 additional cost of the waterslide. Tyra-Lukens
noted we don't have to decide that tonight. Getschow thought we could increase
the portion taken from the Capital Improvement Fund to go up to $4,000,000,but
we would want to fine tune that.
Butcher Wickstrom agreed with doing the extras now. Those are directed at a wide
range of ages for those who would be using the aquatics center. She thought costs
of those extras are reasonable enough to do it now. She would like to keep it at a
zero tax levy so she liked the idea of increasing the amount taken from the Capital
Improvement Fund.
Aho thought adding some of the amenities will bring in other users and more
families to the facility. It is a small additional cost to do some of these alternates,
and he thought the waterslide would bring in more people and would add to the
value of the project.
Tyra-Lukens said she had a bit of a struggle about going to a higher dollar figure
with this,but it comes down to who is living in Eden Prairie and why they are
living here. This is a great family place and we have great facilities. We need to
build on that and the value this amenity adds to our community and will continue
to make it attractive to families. She thought leaving out the waterslide portion
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 8
would not be a wise decision. She believed people chose to live in Eden Prairie
because of the amenities and not because of a low tax rate.
Aho thanked everyone for coming out tonight as well as those who have contacted
Council Members previously. He noted tonight's meeting is a culmination of two
years of hard work on the part of many people. We have evaluated all the possible
options to remedy the current situation. We have done due diligence on our costs
and we have good data. Doing nothing is no longer an option. One single pool
cannot serve the various user groups. The current pool was built back in the 1980's
when we were a small town of 16,000 people. Our population is almost 63,000
now. Our current needs are very different and it is time to do something. It is
somewhat embarrassing for our city when our swim team must hold meets at the
Oak Point pool because we can't hold meets in the Community Center. There are
more swimmers at the high school level than most other sports. We need to take
this seriously. We have a lot of high quality swimmers and we need to meet their
needs as well as those of other users. He noted this is not a conservative versus
liberal issue, rather it is what we need to do to serve our entire community for the
next 30 years. Voters elect the Council Members to represent them. The Council
does not come to residents with a referendum on updating an item of
infrastructure. This aquatics center upgrade is an investment for thirty years. He
fully supported the project.
Butcher Wickstrom thanked the many residents who contacted her to let her know
their perspective on the aquatics center. The community pool has been highly used
for thirty years and has served our community,but for several years it has outlived
its ability to serve our residents' needs. The process the City Council used was a
deliberative, methodical and prudent approach to look at options for what we
could do at the aquatics center. The Council thought about what such a public
improvement would look like. Our goal was always to include as many residents
as possible in our approach. We wanted to determine how to better serve the entire
community of recreational and aquatics users. We conducted a feasibility study to
review the options for the aquatics center. We have looked for efficiencies and for
funding methods. User groups came forward to offer their support. Clearly the
staff has looked at other funding sources. As we reviewed the plans and funding
options, certain attributes came forward that obviously made this a great project. It
is a high quality and highly functioning facility to serve our entire community.
Multiple features will serve a breadth of ages and will better fit our current
demographics. We had a trial run with the current Community Center and have
seen a response beyond our expectations. We are excited to provide a zero tax
impact for the total project. We looked at tax abatement bonds with the lowest
interest rate for the City. We continue to provide investments into the high quality
of life our residents want. This strengthens our ability to attract and retain
businesses. This investment will provide a community-wide return for many years
to come. She believes this is the right project at the right time to serve the breadth
of our population as well as our fiscal expectation of zero tax impact.
Nelson said she made a conscious effort to talk to various groups around town to
make up her mind about what kind of pool we need. It became clear we were not
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 9
serving families with young children with the current pool. She talked to senior
groups who said the pool was too cold. They would like to do more exercise,but
the current pool did not have what they needed. We have heard from the swim
team and the Foxjets that the current pool does not provide for competitive
swimming. Adults have said they can't get time for lap swimming. We really are
not giving anybody what they need for swimming with our current pool so it did
seem like it was time for a community investment in this. We do have a very good
tax rating so we can get as low interest rates as possible, and tax abatement bonds
seem to be the way to go. She believed it is time to make this investment. She was
happy we can pay for it over 20 years without raising taxes. It makes financial
sense and serves all the user groups.
Tyra-Lukens thanked everyone for their input. She thought by hearing from a wide
variety of users we have been able to come up with a great product that answers all
the needs of the community. She said it is not unusual for cities to issue debt
without a referendum or to raise taxes without a referendum. We have a AAA
bond rating even though we have a $54,000,000 debt. Our City is well run and
well managed and we have a strong base of business. We have issued debt without
a referendum for bridges and roads as well as police and fire department needs.
She spoke with the mayors of Edina and Woodbury about their recent upgrades
and they said nobody pushed for a referendum. In response to the comment that
this project is "fluff" and is not needed, she said there are four core areas for which
a city is responsible: public works, public service, planning, and parks and
recreation. If we don't go out for a referendum on building a bridge, why should
we go out with a referendum for an aquatics center. Other cities have had bigger
and better pools for a long time. This project is long overdue. She thought we are
being prudent and efficient with what we are doing for our citizens for the least
amount of money. In response to the suggestion that swimmers should cover all of
their costs, she noted the users of our ball fields aren't covering the costs so that is
not the model. We aren't a business. We don't necessarily expect everything to
cover costs. We need to improve the pool for safety and functional reasons. This is
a pool plan that does an outstanding job of providing for a broad range of users
and will position us well for the future. She thanked the Foxjets for being willing
to do a fund raiser for the pool. She was very much in favor of this project.
Tyra-Lukens said Council Member Case was not able to attend tonight's meeting
but asked her to read his comments for the record, as follows:
"I regret not being able to be with all of you this evening. I'm in training in
Toronto for the week. I very much wanted to opportunity to vote for this
Community Center aquatics upgrade and to fund the project by utilizing
declining debt in a way that will not raise taxes. I have confidence in my
colleagues' knowledge, wisdom, and ability to articulate their perspectives,
but I did want to take this opportunity to share my thoughts as well. I've
asked the Mayor to read my comments into the public record.
Over the years, Eden Prairie has clearly done a lot of things right. It didn't
just happen by accident. And it didn't come free. In some incidences,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 10
residents voted to increase their taxes to pay for amenities that they could
enjoy at the time and for which we to this day reap much of the benefit. But
for other amenities, if not for most, from a state of the art water treatment
facility to the best police and fire departments in the Twin Cities, City
Councils have made the difficult choices, built out a quality city, and taxed
its residents, remembering that every council member is a resident as well,
to fund the choices that have created the city we love.
Currently, the Eden Prairie City Council is weighing the pros and cons of
having our City re-invest around $20,000,000, based on bid openings and
alternates, for an aquatics upgrade at our aging Community Center. Exactly
like anytime we make a decision that involves spending taxpayer dollars, we
take this issue very seriously.
Elected officials are often maligned for NOT standing up to be accountable
for the tough choices, for NOT exhibiting courage to make difficult
decisions that are often not supported by everyone. Curiously, now, some in
our community are upset for the very reason that this Council clearly has the
courage and is willing to be held accountable for a tough choice and make a
difficult decision.
The genius of our American political system is that one person/one vote
means a vote to elect representatives who study issues and judiciously make
decisions for the good of everyone. We have the technology today in
America to have everyone vote on everything and do away with
representative government. However, can you imagine people coming home
from work each evening, exhausted, overworked and under-paid and having
to cast a vote to build a new nuclear submarine, or buy land to build a park
in a neighboring community? In reality, little would pass and life as we
know it would devolve into random chaos.
There's a reason that our political system has survived as long as it has and
that's because representative government works. In fact, one could argue
that most of the problems with our governmental systems today stem from
attempts to circumvent the representative process. We've got a great group
of people on the Eden Prairie City Council. My colleagues are smart,
respectful, experienced, and incredibly connected to this community. With a
combined nearly 65 years of Council representative experience making
decisions meeting after meeting, month after month, history is on our side
affirming the path we've chosen. Eden Prairie is the envy of the region.
Everything works here. The streets are plowed on time even in the worst of
winters, we worry about and pay attention to our lakes, streams and river,
we're safe here, we have amazing parks and trails, our water is fluorinated,
chlorinated, and softened, and our community heritage, arts and culture are
recognized and celebrated.
Upgrading our Community Center is the right thing to do and now is the
right time. Funding it by replacing declining debt and without raising taxes
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 11
is more than appropriate, it's the model and process used by cities across the
nation. I'm not saying this is a no-brainer. On the contrary, after thoughtful
and careful deliberation, I believe it is absolutely the best, most logical and
reasonable course of action for our community to take as we continue our
transition from middle age to mature. We must continue to re-invest in our
infrastructure. Out future depends on it. Our home values depend on it. Our
present and future residents depend on it. Thank you for allowing me to
weigh in on this very important issue coming before the Council this
evening!"
MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to award the base bids
and alternates (to be reviewed and determined at the Council meeting) as
described in the Attachment 1 —Bid Descriptions and Prices.
Getschow said, as pointed out during the previous discussion, all eleven alternates
listed on page 219 of the Council packet should be included with the exception of
No. 5: Waterproofing Under the Ceramic Tile at the Pool Areas; and No. 6:
Provide Aluminum Ductwork at Pool Areas in Lieu of Galvanized.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried 4-0.
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Nelson, to assign contracts
for the awarded bids to RJM Construction and to enter into a guaranteed
maximum price with RJM Construction as defined by the current agreement with
RJM Construction and as illustrated in Attachment 1 —Bid Descriptions and Prices
and Attachment 2 —Assignment of Contracts. Motion carried 4-0.
X. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Aho, to approve the payment of claims as
submitted. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Aho, Butcher Wickstrom,
Nelson, and Tyra-Lukens voting "aye."
XI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
XII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
XIII. APPOINTMENTS
XIV. REPORTS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
C. REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
1. Nine Mile Creek Water Resource Center Construction Update
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 6, 2014
Page 12
Jeremiah said the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has applied for
building permits for the Water Resource Center. City staff is reviewing those
plans. Staff believes there have been a number of changes that are
administratively approvable and that result in a better plan for the property.
The building additions have been eliminated. They plan to use the attached
garage space as a meeting space. They have moved the driveway and parking
area in order to do less grading and to preserve more trees. Some of the
infiltration basins have been relocated and trails have been added to the
property. They also will do a plan for removal of buckthorn and other
invasive species. She said Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
representative, Kevin Bigalke, was present to answer questions.
Nelson asked Mr. Bigalke when the Water Resource Center would be open.
Mr. Bigalke said they intend to break ground very shortly and hope to move
into the new facility in early November.
D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF
G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF
H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
XV. OTHER BUSINESS
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Aho, to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried 4-0. Mayor Tyra-Lukens adjourned the meeting at 9:20 PM.