HomeMy WebLinkAboutFlying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission - 02/07/1996 APPROVED MINUTES
FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 7, 1996 7:00 P.M. City Center
Prairie Rooms A& B
8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Kent Barker, Marge Bundgaard, Peter,
Keller, Rob Kilpatrick, Kate Laseski,Alan Nitchman, Gary Schmidt
STAFF: Scott A. Kipp, Planner, and Barbara
Anderson, Recording Secretary
CALL TO ORDER
Rob Kilpatrick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Commissioners Marge Bundgaard and
Kate Laseski were absent. Roy Fuhrman and John Foggia from MAC were also present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Keller moved, Barker seconded, to approve the Agenda as submitted.
Motion carried unanimously.
II. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 6, 1995 MINUTES
Alan Nitchman asked for a correction on page 4 referring to his statement on MAC's
commitment to the Noise Abatement Program. He said that MAC has made, and
continues to make an effort to reinforce the abatement program.
MOTION: Keller moved, Barker seconded to approve the Minutes of the December 6,
1995 Meeting of the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission as amended. Motion
carried unanimously.
Roy Fuhrman commented that MAC has been concerned about the Noise Abatement
Program at Flying Cloud Airport, and he felt the Minutes indicated otherwise.
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. MAC General Aviation Seminar- January 16, 1996
Schmidt reported on the MAC General Aviation Seminar which was held on
January 16, 1996 and noted that it dealt with a number of reliever airport issues,
including the Flying Cloud Airport land acquisition cost of$38,000/acre for safety
zones A and B. This was option 2, approved by the MAC Commission. Buying
zones A and B and acquiring easements over the developed areas adjacent to these
parcels was discussed, and the costs which were estimated at $13,000 per acre by
MAC in 1992 are now at $38,000 per acre in 1996.
Kipp commented that the City was in opposition to the expansion but in the event
that the expansion goes forward, the City is concerned that the residents get fair
market value for their property according to the Guide Plan density.
Schmidt inquired how lost revenue was calculated and Kipp responded that
valuation was based on the premise that the land was developed with houses at
1.8 units per acre, and valued at $200,000 per home. Discussion ensued regarding
the estimated valuation of the revenue loss from potential development on an
annual basis from the proposed land acquisition property. The Commission
believed both best and worst case scenarios needed to be considered and the
reality issue probably fell somewhere in between. The land is topographically
unique and development can occur in a number of different ways. Schmidt
commented that what land is actually acquired will depend on how the parcels are
divided. The Governor has requested MAC to drop the plan s for a new
International airport, which will put a lot of pressure on MAC and the Airport
Commission.
B. Desiizn Framework Manual for Flying Cloud Airport
Kipp handed out an outline for a Design Framework Manual for the airport, and
explained the need for such a manual for hangar and building construction. It
would give continuity to such things as hangar design, signage, lighting, colors on
buildings, landscaping, etc. The City does not require strict code enforcement
because the airport is owned by MAC, but the Manual would give some
continuity in the case of upgrades and new construction. It would not apply to
those buildings already in place. If the airport expands, the City believes that it
would be important to have some uniformity on the site. The Uniform Building
Code (UBC) standards have to be met, but such things as face brick and other
City code requirements may be hard to enforce on MAC owned property. Staff
believed that design standards would be good and would create a more attractive
airport. Kipp stated that a first draft of the Manual would be available for the next
meeting.
Schmidt commented that MAC requires builders to obtain a permit from the local
governmental authority and to meet the existing codes. Kipp responded that
governmental agencies do not have to meet local zoning codes. Discussion
ensued regarding the difficulties in enforcing requirements if these are set forth in
the manual. The problem of requiring people to meet the code or standards was
discussed. Kipp commented that the Manual could require all metal construction
to have a uniform color scheme. This would not create any additional hardship to
the business owners. The intent is to address what would be acceptable when a
hangar is rebuilt or expanded. The Manual will also address the signage issue to
get rid of painted plywood signs which detract from the appearance of the airport.
It will have to be done within reason and the Commission felt that this would be a
good project for it to undertake.
Kipp stated he would like to see MAC become a working partner in the
development of the manual and seeing that its contents are enforced. Any adopted
Design Framework Manual would be a policy of the City Council. All
construction has to meet State Building Codes in any case. The Commission did
not want to go through the steps of developing the manual if it would not be
enforceable. Kipp briefly reviewed the types of issues that would be included in
the manual and the process that would be done each meeting until it was
completed; he suggested the end of 1996 as a deadline.
MOTION: Nitchman moved, Keller seconded, to go forward with the manual as
recommended by staff. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN/AIRCRAFT INCIDENTS
A. Noise Complaints for November and December, 1995
Foggia stated that they had held a meeting with tower personnel in November to
try to get a message regarding the noise abatement program on the ATIS
recording, but it was not going to happen here at this time. They had discussions
with personnel regarding this and while the idea was initially agreeable to the
tower personnel, it was not acceptable to the tower manager and it was decided
not to do it at this time.
Foggia stated that there were two meetings held in January with tower personnel
on noise abatement and that they all have to agree on the concept, or it will not be
very successful. He said the noise abatement signs have been purchased and are
ready to be installed in February, which will promote the noise abatement
program at Flying Cloud Airport.
Nitchman commented that they got all the things they wanted except the message
on ATIS but the understood that the message would not change behavior.
Fuhrman discussed the noise complaints from November and December, stating
they received several complaints from people who regularly call in. There were
no complaints received in December, and they had double-checked to ensure that
the line was working.
B. Noise Abatement Signage Implementation Schedule
Fuhrman stated that six signs are runway specific and there will be ten generic
signs which will be placed around the perimeter of the airport. These will be
noticed by people who use the airport regularly as well as people who just fly in
and out on an occasional basis. There will be four generic signs along the
runways so there is some exposure all over. The signs will be 2' X 4' and they
will be metal with reflective lettering, and professionally done. He passed around
samples of what the signs would look like. The signs will be installed in the next
two weeks. Kilpatrick inquired about doing a press release, and after discussion,
the Commission felt that staff should brief the City Council on what was going
on, and thus the Eden Prairie News would contact MAC about the signage, and
the news would be released that way. Barker was concerned that there be no
confusion between the noise abatement issue and the airport expansion issue.
Kipp commented he would submit a memo to the City Council detailing the
signage project which would undoubtedly generate a news story. If the airport
does not expand the noise abatement issue is still viable and valid.
V. OTHER BUSINESS
A. New Recommendations for Boards and Commissions
Kipp outlined the recommendations made to the City Council for changes to the
process of appointing people to serve on the various boards and commissions, and
for better communication with the various boards and commissions. The process
has been revised to include a monthly report to the City Council to appraise them
of what the boards and commissions are doing. There will also be a place created
on the agenda which will allow board and commission members to directly
approach the City Council for direction on specific issues or to make reports to
the Council regarding information the Council has requested. This will allow
direct feedback from the Council.
B. Interview Process for Prospective Commission Members
Kipp stated he had attended the open house for boards and commissions and there
were approximately 70 people there who were interested in serving. The
interviews were scheduled for February 8th in Heritage Room IV, and the
appointments will be made at the second City Council meeting in February.
C. General Discussion Items
Kilpatrick requested staff to place an item on the agenda for the next meeting to
put something together to keep the momentum going on the implementation of the
noise abatement program so that on a bi-annual or quarterly basis, the commission
can do an evaluation to ensure they are continuing to move forward.
Discussion ensued regarding Mrs. Vicky Lewis, a City of Shoreview resident who
has been concerned about aircraft flying directly over her house during early
morning hours. MAC cannot identify the aircraft and they have suggested that
they will come out to the house in June when they have a noise monitoring intern
on staff to record noise levels and try to make an identification. Once that has
been done, they will contact those people and suggest that they modify their flight
pattern.
FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION
February 7, 1996
Page 2
VI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Nitchman moved, seconded by Keller, to adjourn the meeting. Motion
carried unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.