HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 559 - Cost Recovery System for Industrial Wastes - EPA - 09/12/1972 VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 559
A RESOLUTION OF INTENT NOT TO TREAT
INDUSTRIAL WASTES WITHOUT A COST
RECOVERY SYSTEM SATISFACTORY TO
THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of
Eden Prairie, Minnesota as follows :
That the Village of Eder Prairie does not anticipate the
treatment- of industrial wastes, and that if it will treat such wastes
a cost recovery system satisfactory to the Enviro► mental Protection Agency
(EPA) will be enacted at such time.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on September 12, 1972.
Paul R. Redpath, MayoK
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, CI. rk
a
A
IrrnuS'ITlAr, wAsTf; Ct)sr Tu.(',ovr;r?x ArrA:;Wirarr
Inaccordance with the Special Fart, A Frant, offer condi.tinn regarding industrial
wastes, it is thn appli.canL's n:sixn;;ibi.lit,y to submit a detailed statement of how
it will nett the requirement; of Part 6)1.3).(c) of the July 2, 19;0 Construction
Orant ReLulations. Enclored are Fecleral Gui.6elines to assist in the, preparation
of this statement. As detailed in tho Gu idol ines, in order for a mu-nicipality's
cost recovery system to be satisfactory, as a rrdnimc:m, it must provide an equitable
means for:
1. Industrial participation in the operation and maintenance costs of
the municipality's total waste treatment system.
2. Industrial participation in the niuticip.ality's capital costs .for the
additive facilities. (Al.t.hout;h it is not mandatory, it is strongly
re(,ormtended that the system als:) provide for equitable industrial.
Participation in the capital costs of the municluclity's exist•i[i4
treatment. works.)
3. A suitable rminicipal ordinance providin,l for: (a) the -.nno uniform
service and functions to all industrial contributors, (b) iut;ir5
ad1i;stments to reflect charts;cs in various operation and maintenance
costs, and (c) individual industrial waste treatment agreements, if
any, consistent with said ordinance.
It. A cost recovery formul.a based upon the applicant's total capital cost
outlay and not Just upon industry's incremental portion of those costs.
5. Industrial participation in any additional co::ts as may be necessary
to assure adequate waste treatment on a continuing basis.
In order to review the applicant's systeem, the following information must be avail-
able and, as necessary, should be included in or accompany the detailed statements
1. General information about manufacturing establishments being served
(or to be served) by the applicant's system.
2. Current and future loading, in terms of flow, DOD, SS, and other sig-
- nificant waste constituents from industrial and all other sources.
3. Proportion of the total unused treatment capacity, over and above
poak requirements of the current loading, reserved for industrial .
users' wastes.
4. Condition of financing for capital improvements including amount and
amortization schedule.
(',.nrt r3i+.i rm for finarl(`in_n And the, amount of operation and maintenance
charges including any special costs created by industrial wastes.
6. Distribution of the revenues to be collected arrant; classes of users.
7. Method of collection of revenues.
In the event it is anticipated that a projer.t will not treat industrial wastes, it
-" will. be necessary to submit-a resolution f rort ycur governing body assuring the
r En7ironmental Protection Ar;ency (EPA) that a cost recovery system, satisfactory to
EPA, will be enacted if industrial war•tes should be treated in the future. Such a
�`.. resolution ?would satisfy the requirements of Part 601.3�t(c) of the Regulations.
Enclosure