HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 291 - A Resolution Approving a Property Division for L.P. Jarrett - 06/10/1969 VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 291
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROPERTY DIV,_ 13N FOR L. P. JARRETT
IN PARCEL 2530, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 22, HENNEPIN
COUNTY, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, L. P . Jarrett has applied to the Village Council of
the Village of Eden Prairie for approval of division of property in
Section 9, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
WHEREAS, the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie finds
that s::id division of the above parcel does not interfere with the
purpose and intent of the Ordinances of the Village of Eden Prairie,
t NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the
I Village of Eden Prairie that a division of the aforementioned property
as hereinbefore described be accepted and approved.
ADOPTED by the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie at
a regular meeting thereof held this 10th day of June, 1969.
Mayor, Village of Eden Prairie
Attest :
Clerk
i
Jw-ie 10, 1969
CO(,�CIL I•IT.."T.UTES
Page t1laree
_D. County Pa_ad_61 (S:_au�; 0:;: Road) . Constn.action Plans and Cost
Sl—iarincq agree_,ent.
playLs for u:e c ,r.-stn_ction of Shady Oak Road fr�dai the Crosstown highway
to rlighway 1069 along ,,ai..th a prcposed cost sharing agreement between the
Village of Eden Prairie an3 the County of Hennepin were revie�,red by the
Council. These docu:rr:nts have, 1:)ae_n L,:ba: tted by 11r. Herbert Klossner,
County Engineer.. I tanager Hite nat ed that the plans conforms to the layouts
previously approved by the (�cuncil and that the Eden Prairie share of the
construction will I)e covered ►iy frur d cipa l state aid finds. Eden Prairie's
share was for u portior, of th(3 storm sewer installation. !,Ir. Shultz moved
that the Council adopt 1 _solution ;�_ approvincg the construction
plans for the project and: tae cost sharing agreement between the County
and the Village of Eder. Prairie.. I:r.. F-Iaugen seconded. All voted aye.
Motion carricu.
E. Hennepin County Highway Depart "r.ent: Proposed 1969-1975 Construction
k'L Ogr cult.
Planager r:Ite reported that the County Engineer had recently prepared a long
range construction program and that he would make a gull report on the
program to the Council at their June 24th meeting.
F. Horse Control Policy.
Nanager Hite directed the Counci l's attention to a provision within the
existing zoning or dinance which prohibited the maintenance of horses on
property situated within 500 feet of subdivided or residentially occup.ie-d
prof erty. He added that the Village ...as beginning to get ccmplaints about
horses from persons li.virg in residences adjacent to prepe.-ties upon which
horses are grazed or stabled and that a numrer of prospective Eden Prairie
-residents had asked what the Village's policies would be relative to the
regulation of horses. Mayor Osterholt suggested that the matter be
considered by the nei•., Citizen`s U-visory Council and that they and persons
now owning horses within the croiroaunity be asked for their recamanendation.
G. ProNert� Division.
1. Section 9, Parcel 2530. L.P. Jarrett. Valley View Road.
Manager Kite recaurendcd that the proposed division of this parcel into
t�,io parcels, the smaller of which i�,ould have 22,500 square feet of area
and 150 feet o-� frontage along Valley View Road be approved. Air. Shultz
moved that the division as proposed be approved. Nr_ Redpath seconded.
A.11 voted aye. The rriotion carried.
2. Section 8, part of Cavan ment Lot 2, William Kocourek. Eden Prairie Road..
i4anager Hite reccna en ded that the division resulting in a parcel having
the frontage of 120 feet and a depth of 225 feet be approved. YIr.. Redpath
moved that the Council approve the proposed division. Air. Shultz seconded
.
All voted aye. The motion carried.
11. Claim Against Wal-Don EuiI-ders, Inc.
Attorney Perbix recommended th. at the Village settle this claim against
Wal-Don Builders, Inc. for $350.00. The claim was initially in the amount
Of $716.00 and was for re.imbu_rsement of water studies in the Top View
Addition. Mr. Shultz moved that the reco=erdation of the attorney be
accepted. 1✓�. Radpath seconded. .All voted ave. Motion carried.