Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutParks and Recreation - 02/16/1976 i 1976 FEBRUARY 2 , 16 MINUTES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AG ENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION_ Monday February 2, 1976 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COMMISSION MEMBERS: Marvin Erickson, Tim Pierce , Richard Anderson, Paul Choiniere, William Garens, Francis Helmer, ; Jerry Kingrey, Geneva Middleton, Mary Upton, Steve Fifield, Brian Mikkelson COMMISSION STAFF: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services Approx. Time to Begin Item 7:3 0 L..: R OLL,CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. ORGANIZATION A. Consideration of Amendment to the Bylaws of the Commission. IV. MINUTES OF JANUARY 19, 1976 MEETING V. PETITIONS REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Nonce. VI. RECOMMENDATIONSIAND::REPORTS 7:45 A. Reports of Commissioners 1 . Councilman Pierce 2 . Chairman Erickson - Joint Meeting with Council B. Reports of Staff 8:00 1 . Further Investigation of Deaver Property 8:10 2. .Community Development Act - 1976 Program 8:30 3. Eden Prairie in Action r Parks, Recreation & Natural -2- Mon. , Feb . 2/76 Resources Commission d Approx. Time to Begin Item VII. OLD BUSINESS 8:40 A. Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study 9:00 B. , Parkland Dedication Requirements VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. B. 9:30 IX. ADTOUNMENT r, approved MINUTES - I PARKS, RECREATION AND 14ATURAL RESOURCES C0101ISSION MNDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1976 7:30 P14 CITY HALL 24EMERS PRESENT: Chairman Marvin Erickson, Tim Pierce., Paul Choiniere, William Garens, Mary Upton, Richard Anderson, Jerry Kingrey, Geneva Middlaton, and Brian Mikkelson R MQGERS ABSENT: Francis Helmer and Steve Fifield STAFF 1,04BERS PEZESF1:Tt Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services OTHERS PRESENTS Duane Hookum Chairman Erickson called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM. II. APPRGVA7, OF ACES. Addition of VII. C. Mini-Rink follow-up notifications Choiniere VIII. A. 1976 Conunission Goals Choiniere t C- Garens moved to approve Agenda as amended. Upton seconded, motion carried. III, ORGANIZATION F A. Consideration of Amendment to the Bylaws of the Commission f Jessen said he had reviewed the question with City Attorney Perbix, and that he had indicated that it is acceptable according to rules and regu- lations as to how the Commission goes about its business. MOTIOPT ? J Pierce moved to change the Bylaws for the Commission; Section Five, Subdivision 1, Paragraph C, as presented by 14,emo of January 30, 1976. x Upton seconded. DISCUSSION Erickson felt there should be a rule to go by, and that if we did not have a full quorum, we were not representing the people fully. He added that he felt the law meant that the Chairperson should cl6 s3 the meeting u if there- was notice of a lack of a quorum. ' Anderson was concerned with the fact that in the past, at a few of the mummer meetings when there were many people present, action could not be taken bocause of the lack of one person. Referring to Perbix's opinion, e Minutes - Parks, Rea, and Page Two Natural Resources Com. ,approved February 29, 1976 c A. Consideration of Amendment to the 'Bylaws of the Commission (Cont'd) Anderson said he felt it had worked in the past and did not feel we had to make a change. Pierce commented that there was nothing wrong with discussing issues after a quorum is lost, but that as far as coming to a conclusion, he felt that a quorum was necessary. He added that since''people have volunteered to serve, they have a responsibility to be present, and that there should be very few meetings that would interfere with action. Garens felt strongly that because the Commission was an advisory body and did not have the responsibility of taking final action, a strict interpretation was not necessary. He felt that if he had to leave early, he would not want to have. business restricted because of this. Pierce disagreed that the Commission did not have the responsibility., and felt that his point was, doing the best as a body, rather than individually. Kingrey commented that as the Bylaws stand now, we are acting in accordance with Roberts Rules of Order and Perbix's opinion. He questioned why we had to amend the Bylaws when we want to reach an agreement on how to act, �. _ and suggested letting the Chairman have the perrogative as to whether business should go on. Erickson felt that the responsibility should not fall on the Chairman and that there should be a rule to follow. A roll call vote was requested by Garens. VOTE Motion was defeated by a vote of 6-2-1. Choiniere - yay Anderson - nay Middleton - abtain Mikkelson - yay Kingrey nay- Pierce - yay Erickson - yay Upton - yay Garens - yay IV. MINUTES OF JAIMARY 19. 1976 1ffiETING Page Four, para. 6, lst line; Delete "shown to us tonight of", Insert "pre- sented to the Commission on January 19, 1976;" after "Maple Leaf Acres". „ Page Four, last para., let line; Delete "shown to us tonight of", Insert "pre- sented to the Commission on January 19, 1976;" after "ldaple Leaf Acres". Page Four, last para., line 6; Delete "with, Add "those portions of". Page Four, last para., line 7; Add "denoted on the plat-as drainage easements, • are" after "Block 2". Minutes - Parks, Rea. and Page Three Natural Resources Com. approved February 22 1976 C ' IV. MINUTES OF JANUARY 19. 1976 MEETING (CONTID Page Six, lst para., Delete "aore", add "lot". Choiniere moved to ,accept Minutes of January 19, 1976. Pierce seconded, motion carried, with Anderson and Mikkelson abstaining because of absence. V. PETITIONS. -REQIIESTS AND COEMNICATIONS A. None. is VI. REConlJENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Reports of Commissioners 1. Councilman Pierce I Pierce confirmed recommendation of the Commission as .that of acceptance of the Study, and added that the Planning Commission was presenting their recommendation to the Council. He said the PR & NR Com. should establish priorities, taking into consideration resources, recreational potential, etc.. He added that the Council Cwould take action by next week. 2. Chairman Erickson - Joint Meeting with Council Erickson reported that all Council members except Bye and four Commission members were present, and that anon-political approach to the issue was used. He touched on questions asked such as: was there a need for recreational improvement-a definite "yes"; non- permanent type buildings were general concensus; could we wait for School Bond issuo-it was generally agreed that we could not; did Council feel PR & NR Com. had a handle on recreational needs-with fair reaction; implementation, and importance of neighborhood meetings; and should we wait for completion of Guide Plan Update-Council members generally agreed that the Commission should not wait. Garens added comment that he felt the Council saw a need for Question one, and that we had our research fbr that issue. ' Chairman Erickson changed order of Agenda, due to no-nessity for some members to leave early. w VIII. VM14 BUSINESS A. 1916 Commission Goals - Choiniere Choinidre requested that 1976 Goals for" the Commission be outlined in a reasonable,condensed, easily understood manner, and that it would then be the Commission's responsibility to carry these out. . lessen apTeed to set up a framework for establishing these goals and asked for ideas in this area. i c Minutes - Parks, Rea. and Page Four P _ Natural Resources iapproved February 2, 1976 A. 1976 Commission Goals - Choiniere _ (cont'd) Pierce suggested establishing a one year priority and five year priority, with an update every year. 'VI. RECOIMNDATIONS AND REPORTS (CONTID FROM PG. 3) E, Reports of Staff 2. Cou=nity Development Act - 1976 Program Jessen reported that last year Eden Prairie received $19,600 from CDA, which Council authorized for use in implementing 1st phase of Bikeway/Hikeway program. He said that the 1975 CDA application pro-. vided for continuation of trail funding through 1977 at the discre- tion of the City. He added that funds, in the sum of 067,000, were received from the Federal Aid to Urban Systems to be used for the trail along Co. Rd. 4, and that the City must match the Federal share with a sum of $30,000. There was discussion about priorities of the bikeway/hikeway trails, :and the research done to establish these priorities. Jessen responded that the priorities are taken from Bikeway/Hikeway Task Force Report and have been thoroughly researched by the Staff. Jessen added that the Council will be considering the program at their next meeting, and any recommendation the Commission may have will be taken into consideration. Garens commented that he did not feel that bikeway/hikeway trails are as important as developing some park areas where more people can use them. r Upton questioned acquisition of sites for school parks. Jessen said it was done in conjunction with the school district. a Erickson inquired as!to the amount we are talking about. Jessen �. responded that the sum was $i35,000. r Cost of acquiring options to buy sites identified as neighborhood parks and school parks was discussed, with the general agreement that only f; one or two could be acquired, with no development possible with that sum of money. Pierce felt that two considerations should be made; how many people 4 benefit by the use of the sum of money, and use of the money in the best way we can, that is, by using the 05,000' to secure more funds. Minutes - Parks, Rea. and 1A, Page Five Natural Resources Come ;' approved. February 2, 1976 2. Community Development Act - 1976 Program (cont'd) Upton directed the question to Kingrey regarding a conmittment by EPAA to provide manpower in helping with the ballfields. Kingrey responded that it was his understanding that volunteer manpower could be available, but does not want to consider it a committment. Jessen commented that the $35,000 would complete the Co. Rd. 4 bikeway/ hikeway trail. He added that the City is facing the obligation to come up with $30,000 to match the FAU grant of t679000 to complete the trail, or turn back the $67,000. In response to Anderson's question on his opinion, Jessen said that all projects are priorities, but from a realistic standpoint, the best -we can get out of some of those are an option for land, but it would construct the bikeway/hikeway trail along this route. Kingrey felt the money could go a long way in developing the Prairie View school park. Jessen said it would do the grading for basic facilities, back stops, boards for skating, and etc.. Erickson felt that we should finish what we are doing, and let the rest of it fall into the improvement program that will have to be worked out. Upton commented that she didn't feel there was any question of where the funds should go, because they had just recently discussed in length the necessity of a safe trailway along Co. Rd. 4. MOTION Garens moved that the Co=ission recommend to the Council that the $35,000 be applied towards continued implementation of Bikeway/Hikeway Trail Plan. Middleton seconded, Motion carried unanimously. 1. Further Investieation of Deaver Pronert� Jessen reported that a letter had been sent from Erickson asking whether they have an interest in selling the land. He said their reply was that they are not trying to market or sell the land at this time, but will be seeking to sell and would sit down with the Staff to decide on price and' details. He added that the 1975 taxes were paid, because this was necessary before a deed in lieu of foreclosure could be filed. 3. Eden Prairie in Action s: Jessen asked for ideas and thoughts for presentation or display for this event. Upton suggested running an informal survey, Jessen agreed that it.was an appropriate time to start.trying to get input for another bond issue. CGareas felt we would be reaching a biased segment of the population, the people that are usually interested i,n community affairs. Erickson asked Upton to head a planning committee for the E.P. In Action weekend, along with Garens and Helmer. r Minutes - Parks, Rec. and Page Six Natural Resources iapproved February 2, 1976 C • VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Pur_ ator.rGreek-0-pen Space Corridor Stud: MO_...TION Choiniere moved to defer question until after City Council takes action. Upton seconded, Motion carried unanimously. B. Parkland Rc.9Lcation R2 irements Jessen referred to memo of February 2, 1976, regarding Council's concerns that were discussed at last meeting in the use of Population Forimtla. Those concerns were: the difficulty in assessing bomber of people anticipated to .live in proposed development depending on type and number of units;, and how proposed formula would be applied to non-residential types of developments, such as, commercial, industrial, . and office. Jessen presented Population Formula transposed to a per acre parkland dedication requirement, with suggestion of collection of money occuring at the time the Building Permit is taken for a particular unit, with inflationary factor(interest) charged, and updating fees annually to keep pace with actual cost to provide park and recreation areas and facilities- MOTION- Choiniere C � moved to accept the Memo of February 2, 1976 regarding Park Dedication Requirements. Anderson seconded, t•5otion carried unanimously- DISCUSSION Non-residential requirements were discussed, with general agreement that this method was easily defensible as being- fair and equitable to everyone. Ctioiniere inquired about the inflationary and deflationary factors. Jesson said that the developer pays the basic fee if it is paid right away, but after a longer time, the developer pays the fee plus interest. C. Mini rink follow un notification - Choinier Choiniere commented on original flyer sent out, and said there is a fair amount of action on the mini-rink in Edenview. He requested a fo_llov-up flyer be sent out on mini-rinks. >, Jessen said that this could be done, and added thay they have had second s� meetings in some areas, as follow-ups. Pierce added additional consideration on CDA regarding 080,000 anticipated for next year and suggested planning what to do with it. Upton suggested adding it to the Goals for 1976. i I7C. ADJOUILIT. TIT C ' Choiniere moved to adjourn at 9:20 PM. Upton seconded, motion carried. Submitted by, Donna Stanley, Recording Secretary AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS , RECREATION AND NATURUAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Monday,February 16 , 1976 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COMMISSION MEMBERS: Marvin Erickson, Tim Pierce , Richard Anderson, Paul Choiniere , Steve Fifield , William Garens, Francis Helmer, Jerry Kingrey, Geneva Middleton, Brian Mikkelson, Mary Upton COMMISSION STAFF: Marty lessen, Director of Community Services ,i Approx. Time to Begin Item 1 7:30 I. ROLL CPZL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. ORGANIZATION A. Swearing in of Members IV. MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2 , 1976 MEETING V. PETITIONS , REQUESTS; AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter from EQC concerning Maple Leaf Acres VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS 7:45 A. Reports of Commissioners 1. Councilman Pierce 2.. School Board Director, .Middleton 3 . Commissioner Upton Eden Prairie in Action. Planning i 1 B. Reports of Staff 8:00 1. Valley View Rd. Bikeway/Hikeway Feasibility 8:15 2. County Rd. 4 Bikeway/Hikeway Feasibility 8:30 3. Forest Hills Play Structure Parks, Recreation & Natural -2- Mon. , reb. 16/76 Resources Commission 8:45 4. Summer Recreation Program Plannin 9:00 5. Development Proposals a. Condon-Naegele Realty b. Protective Life 9:15 6. Consideration of joint Projects with Riley-Purgatory Creek 'Water- shed District VII. OLD BUSINESS A. B. VIII. NEW BUSINESS j A. B. 9:30 IX. ADTOUNMENT i r approved ( MINUTES l PAF{KS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION HONDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1976 7230 PM CITY HALT, 104BERS PRESM- T: Chairman Marvin Erickson, Tim Pierce, Paul Choiniore, William Garons, Richard Anderson, Jerry Kingrey, Geneva Middleton, Brian 141kkelson, Francis Helmer, and Steve Fifield r MEIMERS A!BSEIT: Mary Uptom STAY? PRESENT: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services John Frane, City Clerk Chris Enger, Landscape Architect OTHERS PRES IT: Tom Bartel, E.P. Conmuni ty News c ' The meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM by Chairman Erickson. t II. APPROVAL OF AGE14DAt �- Addition of VII. A. Motorized Vehicles within parks - Anderson Addition of VIII. A. Garden Plots - Gardns Gardes moved to approve Agenda with additions. Choiniore seconded, motion carried. III. ORGANIZATION j A. Swearing in of Members r, John Franc, City Clerk, administered the oath of office to all Coi=ission members present. IV. MINUTES OF 1 DRUARY 2. 1976 1=TING S Page two, under "VOTE", Correct to read, "Kingrey - nay, and Gardns - yay" Choiniore moved to accept Minutes of February, 2, 1976 meeting as corrected. Garons seconded, motion carried. 7, V. PIsTITIONS, RF..:15 3TS AND C0T-2-MICATIONS A. Letter from EQC concerning Maple Leaf Acres r Choiniore moved to receive and file communication of February 11, 1976, from Environmental Quality Council regarding Maple Leaf Acres. Middleton seconded, motion carried unanimously. i Minutes - Parks, Roe. and Page Two Natural Resources Cam. ''approved February 16, 1976 VT, RECOM�I NDATIONS AIM REPORTS A. Reports of Commissioners 1. Councilman Pie c _ Pierce reported that at the last Council meeting, the request by the Commission for a Study on the Nine Mile Creek Corridor was authorized, with the suggestion that the cost not exceed 4p3,000, and that we con- tinue to try and find other funding sources to help absorb this cost. He informed the members that March 9 was the date set for the public hearing on the Purgatory Creek Study and that it was progressing well. He continued that the Council had allocated 05,000 from Community Development hinds to fund a portion of the Bikeway/Hikeway Trail Plan along Co. Rd. /+, and directed the Staff to solicit County High•- way Dept. as far as further funding was concerned, and to contact adjacent landowners. He added that there was a change from HighwW. 5 to Pioneer Trail (trail on East side rather than West), and that the Council has requested the Commission's recommendation on the alternatives as to which route was the most feasible in the Bikeway/ Hikeway Plan. 2. School Ro- IrLDirector, I'Lddleton C 1•Siddleton said the School Board is in the process of gathering data as to what kind of facility and the price for site at Round Fake. She said they have a handle on the needs, educational goals, and the price tag, and they felt the City and School district could be integrated on the financial plan. She added that many points are being considered such as: per capita debt, what choice and priority voters will. get in the Fall, problem of tax delinquency, and total community financial picture, with short term and long term needs from financial view point. Choiniere questioned the 11per capita debt". Middleton said it was the combined total debt between City and School district, and that we are faced with obligations which make it an increasing kind of process. Jessen added that in the recent census the population was 9,100, rather than above 10,000 as anticipated, and it necessitated a re-distribution of debt. Jessen asked about a Spring date for school bond issue. Middleton responded that they had talked about a date later in the year-closer to September or October. She said their report should be completed by June. Garens asked whether the facility would definitedly be a high school at the Round Lako Park site and whether a swimming pool was planned. Middleton said it was definitely to be a high school and the pool was part of the educational needs still being studied. Minutes - Parks, Rea. and Page Three Natural Resources Com. .approved February 16, 1976 Pierce left meeting at 7:50 PM. 3. Commissioner Upton - Eden Prairie in Action P3.anning Helmer reported to the Commission on the progress of the subcommittee for Eden Prairie in Action Weekend. He said they had looked at a map prepared by Upton, pictures of areas, and takeoff type drawings of what the areas would look like. He added that they had talked about a short questionnaire to get a feel of what the community wants, and that aftor the noxt meeting they would have more complete plans. k ; B. Reports of Staff 1. Valley View Rd. Bikeway/Hikeway Feasibility Jessen referred to Council meeting where three priority areas advised by Bikeway/Hikeway Task Force were discussed. He said Community Development funding for 1975 is available for this project and that is why it was chosen first. Jessen responded to various questions on when the road would be up- graded and right-of-way problems. He said the road is about 5 yrs. away, and he felt that gave us all the more reason to put in the trail now. He added that the Esther Hills area would C be a problem because of the narrow right-of-ways, but he felt they could work this out. ' Kingrey was concerned with having to tear up portions of the trail w when the road was put in. Jessen said he didn't feel that was going to be necessary, and that they would work with the City Engineer and deal' wi.th the problems as they occurred. The different alternatives were discussed with general feeling that alternative 5 was the most direct and fastest to the actiti�ity node of the Community, which is Round Lake. Jessen said that Edenvale hag an extensive plan for trails. Kingrey asked whether costs would be determined by segments. Jessen answered affirmativo, and added that they have looked at different parts for topography etc.. � Choiniere inquired about acquisition of land. Jessen answered that there is an existing; right of way and that the City owns most of the land along Valley View Rd. with the exception of a couple of sections of land. f i MO'17011 Garens mavpd to recommend that the Staff investigate Alt. 5 and come back to us vi.th feasibility study at future meeting of questions �, involvod with Alt. 5. Mation died for lack of a second. r Minutes - Parks, Roo. and Page Four Natural Resources ', approved February 16, 1976 1. Valley View Rd..--.- Feasibility (cohttd) MOTION Choiniere moved that the Commission accept in concept the Valley View Alternative for the Bikeway/hikeway route from the Edenvale area to Round Lake Park. Kingrey seconded, .motion carried unanimously. Anderson asked for a point of clarificatio on what Choiniere meant by "concept'!. Choiniere responded that his intention was to accept the concept as stated in the report. r Jessen added that he would contact landowners, get an estimate of costs, and bring it back in a month or so. 2. County Rd. 4 Bikeway/Hikewa - Feasibility Jessen reported that information on memo of Feb. 6, 1976 was presented to the Council and the recommendations were accepted, with the exception of no. one. He said they will analyze in greater detail the right-of-way problems, and he added that they think there will be the need for some land outside of the right-of-way. Jessen responded to questions on the changed route of the trail north of Purgatory Creek and whether the crossings were at grade. He said the changed route is one way of getting people to Co. Rd. 4 without need for crossing. He added that the crossings were at grade. o whether the Highway Department will make any committment Kingrey asked g Y p in writing. Jossen said he felt there would be a contract, and in his discussion with Mr. Lee, they had agreed to work so they can find a route ' that they will not have to tear up later. MOTION Kingrey moved to receive the report of February 6, .1976. Helmer seconded, motion carried unanimously. 3. Forest Hi1,].s Plr}v Structure MOTION N' Choiniere moved to accept creative play structure at Forest Hills, accord- ing to Memo of February 131, 1976. Kingrey seconded, for the purpose of discussion. Motion carried unanimously. Jessen briefly reviewed the concept with Commission members and turned the floor over to Enger, Landscape ,Architect for the City, for questions. He said he has ro-worked the design several times over the past year. He explained that the structure contained close to 100 panels that could be moved to different positions without being taken out completely, except for repair. He described it as made up of sliding units, and felt there could still be some changes on the design. Minutes - :Parks, Rea. and Page Five Natural Resources Com. . ;approved February 16, 1976 J 4. Summer F!ecrea�tion Propram Planni no Jessen referred to Memo of February 13 regarding discussion which took place between Sandy Werts and other people for coordinating various summer leisure activities. He said another meeting was scheduled in early March between Werts and school representatives after development of preliminary program ideas, and is anticipating bringing final summer playground activities recommendation back by April 5. No Action Required. 5. Dever o)anent Projn�osale a. Condon -N epele Renity Jessen informed Commission that the Council had requested them to work out their constraints on the Council Recommendation passed dur- ing the last meeting. He added that he would have information ready for the next Commission meeting. Choiniere asked what position an individual on an advisory body can take regarding action that is taken which he did not feel was in keep- ing %•rlth the advisory body's stand. He said he was personally of the opinion that he is not willing to support any discussion on this matter any further. Anderson also voiced his opposition to the Council action. He felt that the Commission had spent much effort to preserve that area, and added that there were two Commissions making opposite recommendations from the Council vote. He requested an explanation of the action and and -alto felt we should ask for an Environmental Assessment Statement. Jessen said the Statement has already been approved. In response to Choiniere's question, he said the Commission does not have to discuss the matter, but he suggested continuing with the Nine Mile Creek Study and looking; at the .facts, without acting on the Condon Naegele proposal. He added that one reason why the car dealerships are probably valid is that the MCA is contemplated for regional commercial use and it is con- sistent to that degree. Middleton voiced her opposition to the proposal because she felt it changed the whole image of Eden Prairie. She added that we should not have a "freeway strip" such as along Highway 494. MOTION Anderson moved to request that the Council not take any, action on the Condon Naogelo proposal until the Nine Milo Creek Corridor Study has been completed. Choiniere seconded, Motion carried unanimously. Minutes - Parks, Rec. and Page Six Natural Resources Com. r,'approved February 16,, 1976 C: • a. Condon-Naegrele Realty (contIc MOTION Kingrey moved to request that the Council give the reason and basis for their decision on the Condon Naegele concept. Anderson seconded, motion carried unanimously. Jessen said he would have information on the Condon Naegele proposal and on Nine Mdle Creek Study at the next meeting. Most of the members were not opposed to car dealerships in Eden Prairie, but did not want them in this area. b. Protective Life Jessen gave a brief description of the proposal, which would be located on Highway 169 near the Mnbil Gas Station. He said it would be an office building and parkin; facilities on 5L�- acres, with no significant natural resoiircos. He added that it would require park land dedication fee of 02,000. MOTION G-arens it,.oved that the park land dedication value be applied to the Protective Life Development proposal. Anderson seconded, motion carried unanimously. 6. Consideration of Joint Projects with Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District Jessen spoke to the summary of the Memo of February 13• He said they wore awaiting funding for acquisition of Schaitberger Property at Riley Lake through a Dill pending in the Legislature, as part of a one-year funding request by the Pietro Council for development of regional recreational open space. He said the problem is one of timing, and if the Legislature does not act fast enough, the mechanics of selling the bonds and making the money available will not take place by July 1 deadline, and he recommends entering a loan arrangement with the Riley-Purgatory Crook Watershed District. He briefly co=uonted on the other two projects. Choini.ere askod about the point suggested that some money For acquisition of Grill Property come from 1965 park bond funds, and how was the park bond money earmarked. Jessen responded that there was about 00,000 left in the park bond fund and that it was earmarked for acquisition plus development. Fifield left the meeting at 9:00 PM. Gsrons felt the figures on acquisition of Grill property were too high. Jenson said they wore based on appraival done in 1975, and that the lake shore adds value to the slope. Minutes - Parks, Rea. and Page .Seven Natural Resources Com. +iapproved February 16, 1976 6. Consideration of Joint Projects.. District (cont1d) ASOTION Anderson moved to recommend to the Council that a resolution be passed that we investigate funding with Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District on following three projects in order of priority: Schaitberger property at- Riley lake, Grill Property at Starring Lake, and Pemtom Island -Mitchell Lake Estates PUD. Garens seconded. Motion carried with a vote of 8-2, 1•rtth Choiniere and Helmer casting the dissenting votes. Helmer questioned plans if funds were not available. Jessen said. they have approval on Schaitberger funds, but that it is a question of timing; LAWCON money is available to be £;ranted, but we have to put together fund- ing to claim it; and we are looking at other prospects of funding for the Pemtom island. Pierce - back to meeting at 9:15 PId. Choiniere stated that he could not support the motion as it now stands because of the inclusion of the Yemtom island, and feels there are much greater priorities. Jessen co=iented that he had talked to Watorshed District people and he �. feels they will accept our recommendations and priorities, and they have indicatod support for all three ideas. Kingrey called the question and the vote was taken. VII. OLT) i SIITESS Erickson announced the the Goals for 1976 will appear on the next Agenda. Tom Bartel, E.P. Corcmunity News, questioned the Vote on the Condon Naegele proposal 1dbtion in the Minutes of January 5, 1976. a ArOTION Choiniere moved to amend Minutes of January 5, 1976 to read "the motion carried by nll of those voting", on. the Notion pertaining to the Condon Naegele proposal. r' hnderson seconded, and the I.1otion carried unanimously. M A. Motorised vohicl; s td tldn Arks - Anderson r Anderson was concerned with the continual problem of these vehicles being driven in unaccaptable areas and stressed the noed for an Ordinance, rather than ju;.t the ;signs that are now in use. MOTION Choiniere moved to request from the Council, on an advisory basis, a park use Ordinancq if they so aee fit. Middleton seconded, motion carried un- aniinously. v Minutes - Parks. Rec. and Page Eight Natural Resources Com. ',,approved rebruary 169 1976 A. Motorized vehicles:-* . s Anderson_(conttd)_ Jessen commented that the Council would probably give it back to the Commission to. develop. 9III. . I:EW BUSINESS A. Garden Plots for. 1976 - Gardns Gardns suggested offering the garden plots again this year, but stressed that water must be made available. He commented on some of the minor points such as fertilizing etc.. Jessen said he would get a report back to the Commission. A1L 4 �F�I l�U fLY1Ll:11Y i Helmer moved to adjourn at 9s30 PM. Clioiniere seconded, motion carried unanimously. Submitted by, C_ Donna. Stanley Recording Secretary