Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/05/2009 APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 5, 2009 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Phil Young, Council Members Brad Aho, Ron Case, Jon Duckstad and Kathy Nelson CITY STAFF: City Manager Scott Neal, Parks & Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, Public Works Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, City Attorney Ric Rosow and Council Recorder Jan Curielli I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Young called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. All Council Members were present. II. COLOR GUARD/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Young thanked Cub Scout Pack 479, sponsored by The Rotary Club of Eden Prairie, for presenting the colors tonight. III. OPEN PODIUM INVITATION IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Neal added two items under Item XIV.B. and noted the item described on goldenrod paper regarding a police department grant requires Council action tonight. Case added one item under Item XIV.A. MOTION: Duckstad moved, seconded by Aho, to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried 5-0. V. PROCLAMATIONS /PRESENTATIONS A. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Hennepin County Sheriff Richard Stanek gave an update of his office's activities. He noted the Sheriff's Department works in partnership with local police departments including the Eden Prairie Police Department. He said the trend in violent crime is down for the last two years after a number of partnerships and collaborative projects were put in place in 2007. He reviewed the eight lines of business maintained at the Sheriff's Department. He then introduced Inspector Jeff Storms who gave an update on the duties of the Enforcement Services Bureau. Duckstad noted Minneapolis has a huge Police Department, and asked how the crime workload is divided between the Sheriff's Department and the Minneapolis Police Department. Sheriff Stanek said they work with all local agencies and come CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 2 in to assist the Minneapolis Police Department when needed or to provide special services. B. SENIOR AWARENESS MONTH PROCLAMATION Sharon Steiner, Chair of the Senior Advisory Council, reviewed the activities planned for seniors during the Senior Awareness Month. Mayor Young read a proclamation proclaiming May 2009 to be Senior Awareness Month. He thanked the members of the Senior Advisory Council for coming to tonight's meeting and for their work on behalf of seniors. VI. MINUTES A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,APRIL 21, 2009 MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Duckstad, to approve the minutes of the Council Workshop held Tuesday, April 21, 2009, as published. Motion carried 5- 0. B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,APRIL 21, 2009 MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Case, to approve the minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 21, 2009, as published. Motion carried 5-0. VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. AWARD CONTRACT FOR 2009 STREET BITUMINOUS OVERLAY PROJECT TO GMH ASPHALT CORPORATION, I.C. 09-5739 C. AWARD CONTRACT FOR 2009 STREET SEALCOATING TO ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY, I.C. 09-5738 D. APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH PRAIRIE ELECTRIC TO UPGRADE THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND CONTROLS IN WELL NO. 2 E. APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH BERGERSON-CASWELL, INC., MUNICIPAL WELL DRILLERS, TO PROVIDE THE PUMP EQUIPMENT FOR WELL NO. 16 F. APPROVE CONTRACT WITH E. H. RENNER & SONS, INC., TO PERFORM FLOW RESTORATION MAINTENANCE ON WELL NO. 2, INSTALL A LARGER MOTOR PUMP,AND ADDITIONAL WELL PIPE G. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2009-30 APPROVING CONTRACT WITH CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR INSTITUTION COMMUNITY WORK CREW (ICWC) H. ACCEPT LEAST COST PROPOSAL FROM TOTAL ENERGY SYSTEMS FOR 150 KILOWATT GENERATOR TO PROVIDE BACKUP POWER FOR WELL NO. 2 I. RECEIVE FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ADOPT RESOLUTION 2009-31 SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR RIVERVIEW ROAD STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, I.C. 52-157 J. APPROVE SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 5-2009 AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 9, SECTION 9.10, RELATING TO FIRE AND BURGLAR, ROBBERY AND SAFETY ALARM SYSTEMS AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2009-32 APPROVING SUMMARY ORDINANCE K. AWARD CONTRACT TO REPLACE "GARDEN ROOM ROOF" AND THE "CITY HALL ROOF"AT CITY CENTER TO PETERSON BROTHERS ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION L. APPROVE AMENDED CONTRACT AND PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDER ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR LOWER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT STABILIZATION WORK, I.C. 07-5698 M. AWARD BID FOR OVERLAY OF TRAILS TO WILLIAM MUELLER & SONS Regarding Item M, Duckstad asked why capital improvements such as the overlay of trails could not be delayed during this time when the City is watching our spending closely. Dietz said we reviewed this during the presentation about pavement maintenance, and the overlay of trails is an important ongoing aspect of our infrastructure maintenance. MOTION: Duckstad moved, seconded by Nelson, to approve Items A-M on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS /MEETINGS X. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Duckstad, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Aho, Case, Duckstad, Nelson and Young voting "aye." XI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS XII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS XIII. APPOINTMENTS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 4 A. FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT JOINT AIRPORT ZONING BOARD APPOINTMENTS Neal said the City Council discussed membership on the Joint Airport Zoning Board at the April 21 meeting,but there was no formal action item at that time. There was an informal consensus at the meeting to accept the invitation to participate in the Joint Airport Zoning Board. Young said he thought that was the gist of the discussion at the April 21 meeting. He noted Council Members Aho and Duckstad have expressed interest in serving on the board. Nelson asked where the governance of the board extends. Rosow said their authority extends as far as the airport safety zones extend. Nelson asked if the board would have overlaying responsibility with the Planning Commission and the City's Planning Department. Rosow said that was true. He said if nothing was done by the City Council or the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), statute provides that the State substantially lays on the zoning, and there is a model airport zoning statute that could be imposed by the State. He said there is some pressure to form a zoning board at all the airports. He said his understanding is that the MAC will indemnify the City for the taking of private property adjacent to the airport property. Nelson said she was concerned about the whole concept and asked if people who live near there could lose their homes. Rosow said he did not think we are in danger of any homes being lost or businesses being condemned. There is one large private residential property that the MAC had threatened to take,but he understood the MAC is no longer interested in doing anything with that property. He said the kinds of restrictions involved in the zoning board decisions would be those regarding density and height. Nelson noted she would expect height restrictions. Rosow said the density restrictions would occur to prevent the building of a large gathering place within the flight zone. Nelson asked if that would mean Grace Church might be prohibited. Rosow said it would not,but building another large gathering place within the safety zone would be prohibited. Case recalled when Grace Church came before the Council for approval a MAC representative came before the Council and strongly recommended we not approve the church being there. He said the legislature has granted the MAC zoning power over cities so they have power to do what they want anyway. We have 14 years of City Councils that have rejected participating in this type of activity, and he has not heard one compelling reason that our residents would benefit from our participation on this board. He thought the purpose of this was to provide the MAC with cover. He said he would continue to be against this and will vote against our participation on the zoning board. Duckstad asked if, in the event there was a lawsuit as a result of any consequential zoning restriction being too narrow, the City of Eden Prairie would not be held responsible even if we were named in the lawsuit because MAC would step forward to pay the damages. Rosow said we would undoubtedly be part of such a lawsuit,but CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 5 he understood the MAC is willing to indemnify the City for any damages that were awarded. Duckstad asked if the City's zoning board would have any advisory capacity because of the overlap that may occur at the area just beyond the airport. Rosow said the City's zoning board would not have any authority under statute. He said for the past several years the MAC has worked with the City, and the City will have practical input through the zoning staff and the Planning Commission. Duckstad then asked if part of the reason for the zoning ordinance is to provide height separation for the aircraft to maintain with respect to the homes around the airport. Rosow said he believes the intent is not to increase the current height of flights. Young said the creation of this board gives some semblance of power to appointed representatives from other communities over issues within Eden Prairie, and he didn't like that. He thought if the MAC can do this even if we don't participate it makes sense for us to have seats at the table. He asked City Attorney Rosow if there are currently any Joint Airport Zoning Boards that have been placed around other airports. Rosow replied they just recently formed one in St. Paul around Holman Field. Neal noted there is one around MSP airport as well,but there is not a very well developed track about how these things are handled. Young said if the legislature requires it and MAC can do it without us,he didn't understand how it provides cover for MAC. Nelson was concerned if they have been asking us to participate for 14 years and they aren't in place at other similar sized airports this would encourage them to actually set up these zoning boards. She didn't think Flying Cloud Airport is the same as Holman Field in St. Paul, and she would just as soon not have the zoning board. She would rather put the whole issue on the table until we see that other airports have these. Young said we are not sure we are jumping ahead of the field because we don't know for sure they haven't gone to any of the other airports. Neal said from what we understood at our meetings that is their intent, and they wanted to work on setting them up one at a time. Nelson said her preference is to have them start somewhere else other than Eden Prairie. Young was concerned if we don't voluntarily participate, they will proceed without us, and he was not sure we can change the priority list for these boards. Neal said the letter from the MAC staff asked that this be done in March. Duckstad said as the item comes tonight we are to decide whether to place two members of the City Council on the proposed zoning board, so either we pass the resolution to appoint two of our members to the board or we retreat from that opportunity. The zoning ordinance pertains in part to zoning regulations that would have some affect on Eden Prairie citizens. He thought we need to have some voice on that zoning board to be able to participate in what they do. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 6 Case said there are other players in this whole zoning board situation. He was not looking to appease the MAC or to fight against them. They have a focus that is theirs and he respects that;however, very few of our residents profit from that airport and he hasn't seen any compelling evidence this would help our residents. He thought we should table it and perhaps call other cities to find out if there is a reason not to join. Aho said if we table this there is a danger that the MAC will go ahead and appoint the zoning board, and there won't be room left for us. He thought it is up to us and it is our duty to step forward and be a part of this. We need to represent our residents' interests on this board. Neal said when we met with the MAC their rationale for setting up the boards one at a time had more to do with their own staffing levels. They told us they needed to have some logical progression. He said Chanhassen and Shakopee have already appointed their representatives to the proposed Joint Airport Zoning Board,but he has not yet heard from the City of Bloomington. MAC staff told us they are under direction to get this done and fully intend to implement it. One of the first items of business they will undertake is to look at safety zones to determine if they are too big or too small. It is just as likely that some of these zones could be smaller and thereby removing some impediments to development of land around the airport. Young said he agreed with Council Members Aho and Duckstad, and he thought we would miss an opportunity and regret it if the body is formed without us. MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Duckstad, to accept the request of the Metropolitan airports Commission to participate in a Joint Airport Zoning Board for Flying Cloud Airport and appoint Council Members Duckstad and Aho to the Joint Airport Zoning Board for Flying Cloud Airport. Motion carried 3-2-0, with Nelson and Case opposed. XIV. REPORTS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. Case— Goodrich-Remus Barn Regarding the request by Hennepin County to take ownership of the barn the Council discussed at the last meeting, Case said he knows of a proposal by an individual who would like to own or lease it as a farm barn and who would not need parking,just access to the barn. He asked if we could direct staff to help facilitate this,because it is something he has heard the County would want. Young said he didn't see how this would require a formal City Council action, and he thought staff should accommodate the interests of a resident. Neal said staff would be happy to act as facilitator for that sort of discussion. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 7 B. REPORTS OF CITY MANAGER 1. Budget Advisory Commission Recommendations Update Neal said at the Council meeting on April 21 there was discussion about the proposal and recommendations from the March 24 Budget Advisory Commission (BAC) meeting. He noted one of the recommendations was to move the operations of the Senior Center to the Community Center. The other two actions were to rebid the current City Attorney contract and to change the way we inspect our facilities. He said the Council did not act on the recommendations that night because there was to be an April 28 meeting of the BAC where they would have more discussion of the recommendations. At the April 28 meeting a motion was discussed and defeated to rescind the recommendations. He read the motion from the approved minutes of the March 24 meeting of the BAC. He said the BAC is looking for the Council's direction on this particular recommendation. Neal said this is the year we were planning to discuss the RFP for the legal services contract with the City Council. He thought there was a misunderstanding among the BAC members about how we inspect City facilities so that item is somewhat moot. He thought there are a couple of different ways to look at the Senior Center recommendation. He said the Council could accept the recommendation,reject it, or recommend staff take a look at how we provide senior services in the community and see if the Senior Center is the best place to provide those services. Young said the recommendations from the BAC address the 2010-2011 budget cycle; however, the Council hasn't yet seen the proposed 2010-2011 budget from staff. It takes five-six months to prepare the budget and then work through it. The Council will work through it and will approve the final budget in December. He said he was one of those who were a little surprised by the BAC recommendations when they came out,because that wasn't the usual time in the process when recommendations for the budget would come out. The recommendation about the Senior Center brings up an issue the Council addressed a couple of years ago; however, two years ago when the issue came up, it came later in the cycle when we were actually entertaining the recommendations of the BAC. At that time the Council opted not to study options for the Senior Center. He thought it would be premature to adopt any aspect of the recommendation this evening, so we can either dismiss it out of hand or incorporate it into a more thorough budget discussion. The report just makes a recommendation without including any underlying data. Duckstad thought before we make any decision on anything we should have all the facts, so he thought the issue begs for some kind of a study to find out whether there is room for the senior programming at the Community Center and if it could provide a good fit for the seniors. He assumed the BAC is sending a good faith recommendation, and there are serious budgetary problems this year that we have to act on. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 8 Case agreed with Council Member Duckstad's comment that many issues and services might require study. He thought personal values and priorities could lead us to make certain statements tonight. There are many facilities around the community that could provide the functions of the Senior Center,just as people might come to us and say we don't need all the land we have set aside in the City for parks. His concern is that the Senior Center has high value and is a priority place. Some things deserve study but his preference tonight would be to say no to the recommendation to change the location of the Senior Center because it is such a priority and has such value to the community. Nelson said she believes we did look at this issue two years ago and staff spent a good deal of time looking at the costs for this. She finds value in the Senior Center, and we need to make a definite statement that we believe in providing services for seniors in Eden Prairie. We may even want to have a formal mission statement for the Senior Center. The economy is particularly bad for seniors now, and they need something like the Senior Center. She was ready to reject this proposal; however she was not against looking at all the programs to see if there may be a way to do things cheaper at the Senior Center. According to the Senior Task Force Report the number of seniors is increasing. She thought staff could look at this recommendation if we have to, but she thought there are better uses for their time. Aho thought there has been a big misconception about this recommendation from the BAC. It came to the Council sooner than we anticipated, and we didn't ask for it to come at this time. There is a misconception we are looking at closing the Senior Center in 2009,but this recommendation is for a future budget discussion for 2010 and 2011. He has had discussions with staff about the ability to move the current programs to the Community Center and what the options are. When we built the Community Center we did not fully build it out to the highest number of square feet, so we don't have the extra space that would allow us to accommodate the senior programming at the Community Center. He thought there is a lot of value in having a dedicated building for the Senior Center. He didn't think it would be fruitful to look at moving it to another location. He was not opposed to any recommendation from the BAC, and we should thoughtfully evaluate those recommendations. Young asked if Council Member Aho supported Council Member Duckstad's recommendation to study it. Aho said he agreed with Council Member Duckstad's suggestion to study it further;however,he didn't think it is worth spending a lot of staff time to do it since there really isn't room to move it to the Community Center. Young said, after the BAC made the recommendation, Mr. Lotthammer, Mr. Neal and he met with the Senior Advisory Council at the Community Center to fill them in on the status of our budget process. We discussed the recommendation with them and let them know what options we might take CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 9 this evening. This recommendation comes at too early a time in our 2010- 2011 budget process. He said he could be counted as a skeptic of the recommendation that the senior programs could be seamlessly moved to the Community Center without any loss of value. Mr. Lotthammer has said there isn't space available at the Community Center unless you take out the paying programming. He also had no interest in this becoming an annual issue for the Council. He understood Council Member Duckstad's recommendation to study it and put it through the normal process. He thought there may be some value in completing the evaluation and having staff get the information to the Council so we have all the data in order to evaluate it. Duckstad thought everyone on the Council wants the seniors to have a place to go and don't want to disrupt anybody,but he thought it is in the best interest of the entire City of Eden Prairie to get a study and deal with it properly. He was still in favor of a study because we need that information before we make an important decision on issues like this. He said he has talked to a lot of seniors and they are concerned about taxes because they have a limited amount of income and were being driven out of the City because of taxes. We need to look at the big picture and do what we think is right. Neal said staff would be well capable of doing this kind of analysis in house. We have good access to information and cost figures and it wouldn't take that long to put together. He thought the Council may want to consider routing this sort of study through the Parks Commission in order to get public input because that is the commission through which the senior programming is organized. He said this is certainly an issue that doesn't seem to be going away and one that causes anxiety every time it is raised. He said the facts are not well established on it, and it would be worth our time and effort to clear up the issue. MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Case, to state that the City Council supports the Senior Center, to look for input from the public on the recommendation by going through the Parks Commission process, and to direct staff to put together an overall picture of what our Senior Center programming and costs are. Motion carried 5-0. Young said, to recap, the issue will go to the Parks Commission to get more input from residents and to provide a recommendation to the Council. He said he made a commitment to the Senior Advisory Council that anytime the issue came back before the City Council there would be ample public notice well in advance. Nelson noted the Council just went on record that we support the Senior Center. 2. ARRA Update CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 10 Neal said he will leave this item on the agenda for every meeting as we get a clearer picture of what the ARRA means to the City. He asked the Council to take action on one aspect of the funding tonight, the Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) program. He said Eden Prairie is eligible for$71,087 in funding from this grant program. The Police Department plans to use the funds for the CounterAct curriculum, the Juvenile Diversion staffing, Park Ranger program, the Cellebrite UFED system, and a Recon Scout robot. He said the grant eligibility was determined by our population and crime statistics, and we need to have an action by the Council tonight to accept or not accept the money. He said staff recommends we do accept the money. He said there are three other items in addition to the Byrne JAG funding: the supplemental CDBG grant for$69,000 which is scheduled to come to the Council for distribution on May 19; the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant; and a Cops Grant program similar to previous Cops Grants. The energy efficiency grant is the largest part of the ARRA funding our City has eligibility for. It is non-competitive and is based on population, so we are eligible for$627,000 of funding for energy efficiency programs. The City can decide to use it on municipal buildings such as items for the 20-40-15 programs or for trail construction. We could also use it to fund private programs. The purpose is to get money into private hands as quickly as possible so the timelines are very quick, and the Council will need to act on this funding at the next meeting. The Cops Grant would provide three years of funding for police officer positions that have been frozen or eliminated because of budgetary difficulties. We have one position that is frozen vacant that we have not rehired for. The requirement of the grant is to not reduce the count below what it was when we take the money. The Federal government has budgeted about one billion dollars for this nationwide. It is a competitive program, so there is a possibility that we would not receive it. We have a placeholder position,but we will need to know by May 19 if we will accept the grant. Young asked if the vacant position on the police force was previously filled or newly created. Neal replied it was previously filled, but there was a hiring freeze earlier this year and when the position went vacant we did not fill it. Duckstad asked if the only issue before the Council tonight is the Byrne JAG funding. Neal said that is the only issue for Council action tonight. Duckstad asked about the Park Ranger portion of that funding. Neal said we have a number of Park Rangers now and had contemplated a reduction in that existing program before the funding became available. Duckstad asked what happens after this limited amount of money runs out. Neal said we would most likely reduce the size of the program at that point. This funding would keep our Park Ranger staffing at the current level instead of dropping back. Duckstad was concerned if we hire someone and the money runs out, then we have to decide whether to fire them or keep them on. Police Chief Reynolds said the Park Ranger program is a part time seasonal employee with no CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 11 benefits and is usually a student interested in law enforcement. They act as an extra set of eyes and ears in the parks and help to direct traffic for large events. The Park Ranger positions have a natural termination at the end of the summer and do not encumber us with a fulltime employee. Case said he has some personal experience with the CounterAct program in the schools and it is a great program. He has also had a positive experience with the Juvenile Diversion program. He thought both programs save money and have a lot of positive results. Aho asked if there are any other staffing positions that are involved with the grant money that would encumber us in the future. Chief Reynolds said there will be staffing in the Juvenile Diversion and Park Ranger programs. The Juvenile Diversion program is done by a former police officer and other officers on staff on an overtime basis. Neal noted this is a noncompetitive grant so we just have to say we will take it. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Nelson, to approve the agreement authorizing Hennepin County to submit a grant application to the United States Department of Justice for FY09 Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. Duckstad asked if an office for the Juvenile Diversion program is already set up or would this add another person. Police Chief Reynolds said Mr. Thompson is assigned to that program and we consider him a part time employee. Neal said he is a staff member who worked for the City in the schools for a number of years, and when he retired we began to use him part time to do this kind of work. Young asked if there are any additional costs to the City that we would individually incur if we accepted the grant funds. Chief Reynolds said the grant funds would be used to pay the wages for the part time employee, and none of the money would be used to set up an office. Young asked if there are additional costs for equipment or space to rent. Neal said it would be the existing person doing the same things. Young then asked if these five items were proposed to be cut and if accepting these funds will not incur any other funding obligations on behalf of the City. Chief Reynolds said that was correct. Duckstad said what troubles him the most about this issue is that the money is coming from taxpayers, and he objected to the morality of grabbing this money. Nelson said she was glad the money exists so we can keep the program going and get some of the hardware items we might not otherwise have. She thought overall it helps the economy and it is an advantage when you can save money for the citizens. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 2009 Page 12 Young said he expressed skepticism when Mr. Neal first advised us that staff would explore the possibilities for stimulus dollars. He thought there is a lot of validity about what Council Member Duckstad said, and just because it isn't our money doesn't mean it isn't taxpayers' money. Neal noted we are not coming up with new programs just to spend the money. These are existing programs currently in place that are valuable public safety programs. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried 4-1-0, with Duckstad opposed. 3. City Center Landscaping Neal said he mentioned at the last meeting that we were preparing some exemptions to do something environmentally innovative with the landscaping around the City Center. He said staff will bring that to the May 19 Council meeting. 4. Joint Session with School Board Neal said we received an invitation from the Eden Prairie School Board to meet in a joint session from 5:00 to 6:00 PM on Tuesday, June 9 at the School Administrative Center. He asked Council Members to check their calendars for availability, and Ms McWaters will call to confirm their availability. C. REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XV. OTHER BUSINESS XVI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Duckstad moved, seconded by Nelson, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Young adjourned the meeting at 8:47 PM.