Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBoard of Adjustments and Appeals - 05/15/1975 - Special • APPROVED MINUTES BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS Thursday, May 15, 1975 City Hall , 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Sorensen, James Cardinal , James Wedlund, Tom Cebulla MEMBERS ABSENT: William Bye STAFF PRESENT: Wayne Sanders I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 1975. Mr. Sorensen moved to approve the minutes as published. Mr. Cebulla seconded the motion. All voted aye. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MAY 9, 1975. Mr. Cardinal moved to approve the minutes as published with one exception: Page 1, Para 2 from the bottom, the word "land" should be "lane". Mr. Sorensen abstained due to absence. Mr. Cebulla seconded the motion. Mr. Cardinal , Mr. Wedlund and Mr. Cebulla voted aye. • III. Variance permitting setback into sideyard of approximately 10' for chain link fence and dog run. Location - 6574 Flying Cloud Drive. Mr. Sanders stated that Mr. Brill was asking for a 10' variance and 7 1/2 to 8' fence within._20 foot sideyard setback. It should be noted that the inside fence should be squared off. Mr. Brill presented a letter from the owner of the property to the east of his stating approval of the , request. Mr. Sorensen requested that the minutes state he would not vote or participate in deliberations as Mr. Brill is his client. Mr. Brill stated that from the outer fence to the runway it is 512". Also the runs are removable cages. Mr. Sorensen asked a point of information as to whether a removable cage was considered a fixture or a structure. Mr. Sanders stated that.he would consider it a structure because it is attached to the building and part of usable space. There was some discussion as to whether or not people moving outside of the fence would cause the dogs to bark. It was stated that the outer chain fence is 8' high. There was also discussion as to whether the dogs would be able to climb the fence. Mr. Brill stated that it would be impossible for a small dog to climb such a tall fence. The larger dogs would not try to climb it but would try to jump over it only if they had been trained to jump fences. Board of Appeals & Adjustments Minutes Page 2 Mr. Sorensen inquired whether board members were aware of the nature and design of adjacent land use, especially the mini-storage structure which would abut the proposed fence area. Mr. Wedlund questioned if the traffic coming and going from the mini- storages would distrub the dogs. Mr. Brill stated a berm, which is a mound of dirt, has been built up about 6' high behind the kennel. He plans on planting pine trees, bushes and shrubs to block the view of the kennel from highway 169/212. Mr. Cardinal moved that the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments hereby grants a variance in the sideyard setback requirements of Ordinance #135 in accordance with the plans dated 4/22/75 with full length runs on the Bruce Brill property located on Flying Cloud Drive provided that the ex- terior fence around the kennel dog run area be between 7 1/2 to 8' in heights throughout and be of wood construction, from the present building along the side fronting on Flying Cloud Drive and along the Northeasterly side to a length sufficient to remove the possibility of visual observance from Flying Cloud Drive and from normal pedrestrian movements on the adjacent Minnesota Mini-Storage property. Said determination of visual observance to be made by the City Building Department giving consideration to the structure, topography and plantings on the said adjacent Mini-Storage • property. Mr. Cebulla seconded the motion. Mr. Sorensen abstained. Mr. Wedlund, Mr. Cardinal and Mr. Cebulla voted aye. IV. Field variance of minimum setback requirements. Con't to next meeting pending discussion with staff set for May 28. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Submitted by, . Rebecca Quernemoen Recording Secretary