HomeMy WebLinkAboutHeritage Preservation - 03/20/2006 APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MONDAY, MARCH 20, 2006 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER
Prairie Room A & B
8080 Mitchell Road
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Betsy Adams, Chairperson; Molly Gilbertson, Vice
Chairperson; Bob Amell, Deborah Barkley, Nina
Mackay, Ed Muehlberg, Jane Plaza
STUDENT MEMBERS: Danny Dunleavy, Anna Hewitt, Jennifer Nicklay
GUESTS: Dick Van Sickle, Friendship Ventures
Stuart Bailey, Architect
Ed Stracke, Friendship Ventures
Richard Akerlund, future HPC member
COMMISSION STAFF: John Gertz, Historic Preservation Specialist
Allison Burr, Recording Secretary
I. ROLL CALL
Chair Adams called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Student Members Anna Hewitt and
Jennifer Nicklay were absent. Guest Dick Van Sickle joined the meeting at 7:14 p.m.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Adams noted the plan review of Glen Lake Children's Camp under New Business will
precede Reports of Commission and Staff.
Gilbertson noted the date on the agenda should read March 20 rather than February 27,
2006.
MOTION: Mackay moved, seconded by Gilbertson, to approve the agenda as amended.
Motion carried 7-0.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 27, 2006 MEETING
Adams noted on page 1 of the minutes under Anderson Schoolhouse Deconstruction, the
second sentence states 20 percent of material was thrown away. It is actually 80 percent
of the building that was thrown away and 20 percent that was retained.
MOTION: Plaza moved, seconded by Amell, to approve minutes of the Heritage
Preservation Commission meeting held February 27, 2006, as corrected. Motion carried
7-0.
Eden Prairie Heritage Preservation Commission
March 20, 2006
Page 2
Adams introduced Richard Akerlund and indicated he is attending the meeting as a guest
but will be joining the HPC next month as a member.
IV. NEW BUSINESS
A. PLAN REVIEW—GLEN LAKE CHILDREN'S CAMP
Stuart Bailey, Architect, stated plans continue to be worked on for a projected
late-April start. One of the reasons plans were requested for the HPC to review is
Friendship Ventures is in the process of beginning to complete the plans and
further complete the detailing of the smaller pieces of the building.
Bailey indicated he is also seeking input on outstanding issues. He wishes to
explain the logic and reasoning behind the project, as this is approached as a
restoration on the outside and a renovation on the inside. The plans are a work in
progress.
Bailey asked for questions and input from the HPC.
Adams asked what sorts of things still have to be done. Bailey responded one of
the areas not complete is shown briefly in the plan, the foundation system. One of
the guests coming is Dick Van Sickle, the structural engineer. He will address the
details of the foundation so they are at a frost depth so the buildings stop moving
around. There has been uneven settlement due to frost action, and the goal is to
alleviate that by putting in a frost foundation.
Adams stated lots of the things discussed when the HPC first met with Friendship
Ventures in June of 2005 are included here. She commended their work. She
noted one issue remaining is the windows.
Bailey stated he met with a representative with Marvin Windows earlier today to
discuss the windows. He added there have been conversations with Mark
Buechel with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) with respect to how
to deal with the existing historical element. The condition of the windows in
some places is better than others. However, in looking at it, there is single-pane
glass which is fine for a two- or three-season application and is less effective for a
four-season application. The question is how to maintain the historic elements
and upgrade the safety.
Bailey stated the proposed upgrade for the windows is as follows: they are
suggesting replacement of the windows with sashes that fit within the existing
openings. This would be an out-swinging awning window with screening on the
inside.
Dick Van Sickle joined the meeting at 7:14 p.m.
Eden Prairie Heritage Preservation Commission
March 20, 2006
Page 3
Bailey stated the goal is to fit the window in, and the exterior would be primed
and painted as it is now, and the interior would be bare wood, as it is now. In
this case the screens would be on the interior. With respect to the longevity of the
building, this is the best solution.
Adams asked if this solution to the windows has been proposed to SHPO.
Stracke stated there were two issues when a grant was submitted, the partitions on
the bedroom and the windows. Mr. Buechel seemed more concerned about
partitions than the windows. He stated Mr. Buechel told him that any objection or
concern has to come through the Department of Interior, and they do not
understand Minnesota winters.
Bailey continued the plan is to have the windows removed and saved, not
discarded. There are some interior doors to be changed out as well.
Adams asked if he is saying they are not planning to destroy the casing. Bailey
responded that is the intent. Stracke added some of the windows are not worth
saving.
Plaza asked if they would be looking to change all the windows or if one could be
left as an example. She stated she looked at the minutes from a meeting held last
summer, and one of the comments was putting in windows not existing there now.
Bailey stated at the previous meeting there was the question of possibly
refurbishing existing windows in a portion of the building to show the original
design and intent. That has been discussed. Also, going through the original
plans, there have been some new door openings added and some other window
openings were in-filled; a couple of them were covered up altogether. The
proposal is to bring them back to the original 1922 blueprints.
Bailey stated they are open to keeping existing windows in a couple of places.
Gertz asked how Marvin Windows would attach a sash on the exterior and not
alter the frames.
Bailey responded Marvin Windows is going to provide him with some details
based on the representative having viewed it the first time today. It appears on
the existing configuration there is a screen on the exterior, and it appears the
screens could be pulled off if need be.
Gertz asked why the existing sash cannot be moved to the outside and screen be
brought to the interior. He asked if somebody has not looked at the window.
Stracke stated the position Friendship Ventures is taking is that this will be a
year-round structure, and efficiency for heating is important.
Eden Prairie Heritage Preservation Commission
March 20, 2006
Page 4
Stracke added some of the participants at Friendship Ventures have severe
behavioral issues and often strike out at some things. Part of having the screen on
the inside is to protect the person should they strike out and hit the window.
Akerlund suggested there are cabinet makers with Marvin Windows who can
make just about anything. He suggested having some of their master craftsmen
look at it.
Gertz added the important thing is that some effort be made to try to reuse the
windows. He understands there are safety issues,but those can be addressed. If it
turns out those things are not feasible, then alternative windows become an
option,but there seems to be some more work to be done.
Amell stated this could be sent back and forth ad nauseum. He believes this
should not be postponed any longer.
Stracke stated $600,000 has been raised towards this $1 million project. Critical
to the start of the project is union labor, and they are only available in April and
May. If it does not start until June, then it will not happen for another year. He
understands the building's integrity needs to be maintained,but the participants
also need to be safe. He stated Friendship is trying to figure out a reasonable
solution.
Gilbertson asked if they will custom make the windows to make them look
historic. Bailey responded one of the configurations for the windows is there
would be insulated glazing instead of single pane glazing. One of the ways to
achieve the look of a historic window is to apply the muntons to the exterior and
interior of the window.
Discussion continued regarding the widow possibilities.
Gertz suggested the windows are not an impossible task,but a solution has not
been found yet.
Stracke stated this will be the only building that people live in where there is not
protection between the glass and the living area. He stated the plan calls for a
screen, which is the way all cabins are constructed at Camp Friendship.
Gertz asked if there is a way to retrofit the historic window and put the screen in.
Stracke responded it goes back to cost and efficiency. For it to be a functional
entity, it really has to be year-round.
Adams suggested both sides compromise.
Bailey discussed further options about the windows.
Eden Prairie Heritage Preservation Commission
March 20, 2006
Page 5
Adams asked if it is impossible to reconstruct the windows and fit within the
parameters that Friendship Ventures need. Bailey stated that may be the case.
Gilbertson asked if the windows will swing out. Stracke stated that is a
requirement.
Adams asked what Friendship Ventures is requesting at tonight's meeting.
Stracke responded that in order to keep the project moving, they will be put on the
agenda for the April 18"' City Council meeting. The plan is to go to the City
Council and show them the project. It does not require Council approval because
it is a restoration project,but they do want to keep them informed. The problem
is union labor. They need to do their work prior to the first week in June because
the summer camps begin then. Then interior work will begin in the fall again. He
stated Friendship does need some sort of blessing from this group because they do
not want to go to the Council and have people argue about whether this is
appropriate.
Akerlund asked if the windows will be worked on this spring or in the fall.
Stracke stated they will be a fall project.
Stracke stated the Minnesota Historical Society wants to see the plans for the
interior walls dividing the sleeping quarters, and he believes a resolution has been
arrived at.
Akerlund stated they can get the go-ahead with the renovation, and work out the
particulars with the windows by the fall. Stracke stated that is a possibility.
Bailey stated another issue not reflected on this plan that was brought up today
has to do with the accessible route to the Birch Hall building. Currently an
accessible route in this configuration does not exist. What has been discussed is
how to get an accessible route to the building and get an exterior ramp into the
arts and crafts room of the building that would be compliant with the federal
guideline with the ADA, which would deal with the civil rights issue of being
able to access the building.
Bailey continued it would not negate Chapter 1341 in the Minnesota Building
Code,but Friendship must be sensitive to the clientele who use this building to
avoid any of the civil rights pratfalls that could occur with someone who may feel
they have been slighted. He stated he would want to avoid 40 or 50 feet of ramp
which would destroy the character of that building. They are working on a
solution with a ramp and railings plus the grade that is there.
Adams asked if the HPC members would like to speak among themselves for a
few minutes
Eden Prairie Heritage Preservation Commission
March 20, 2006
Page 6
Muehlberg stated it is difficult to provide a recommendation since there is nothing
concrete to move forward on with the windows.
Gilbertson asked if another HPC meeting could be held prior to April 18. Mackay
stated she likes what Akerlund suggested; it does not matter if they have the final
recommendations because windows will not be started until the fall.
Stracke responded that may be a good solution. The foundation, et cetera, will be
finished by the first part of June. If there is no issue with that, then he requested
letting Friendship move forward with that part of the project. He stated one
concern of the Board is if HPC disallowed removal of these windows. That
would be of concern with the Board, since fundraising has already begun. The
Board is very excited about this project. He stated he is just asking that serious
consideration be given to resolution of this issue.
Adams stated the HPC can still have a meeting and a further report from the
guests on the issues that have arisen today while still giving approval on what has
been seen so far.
Stracke stated the more research that is done, the more it costs. Cost is an issue.
Adams asked what course of action Barkley recommends.
Barkley stated she believes an interim meeting should be held, and get them
started on the excavation work.
Stracke noted the windows were not part of the grant application. The grant is in
the amount of$79,300. It was based on his conversation with Mr. Buechel about
the lack of understanding of Minnesota winters.
Gertz stated HPC is only approving what it sees here today. The overall plans are
great; the only issue is the windows,because he does not believe that will meet
the Secretary of Interior's guidelines. He stated SHPO will have to be included in
the planning.
Stracke stated Mr. Buechel indicated Friendship literally can do anything they
want with the building. But if it falls outside what the Secretary of Interior deems
as historic, it could be de-listed. But he stated they do not understand Minnesota
winters.
Adams stated that is really not the issue. If there are replacement windows, there
are expectations for those windows.
Gertz stated regarding Buechel's comments about doing anything they want, there
is truth in that. However, it is a City property so it falls under the purview of the
Commission because it is an historic property.
Eden Prairie Heritage Preservation Commission
March 20, 2006
Page 7
Stracke stated he concurs. But Friendship is the organization trying to raise the
money so it is functional.
Adams stated HPC's mission is to be caretakers of the historic buildings. HPC
has to make sure everything has been investigated. And if Friendship Ventures
can demonstrate everything has been investigated, the goal is not to hold the
project up.
Muehlberg stated a motion should be made stating it is contingent on further
review of the window issue. Amell asked if this will hold up the progress of the
renovation.
Stracke stated he believes they can proceed. Bailey added if Friendship goes in
with a full set of documents about how they want to construct the building, yes, a
building permit can be gotten. If the windows are changed, that really does not
wind up being a building permit issue.
Discussion ensued regarding whether a special HPC meeting needs to be held
prior to the next Council meeting. It was decided there will be one more regularly
scheduled HPC meeting prior to the next Council meeting, so an update could be
provided at that time if need be.
Van Sickle stated this will be a very straightforward way to bring the building
into compliance. He described how he would like the panels constructed. He
stated this help with the varmint issue.
Bailey described the various types of wood throughout the structure.
MOTION: Gilbertson moved, seconded by Mackay, to approve the plans dated
3-13-2006 submitted by Friendship Ventures for Edenwood Center Dormitory
and Dining Hall Buildings of the historic Glen Lake Children's Camp, with the
following condition: if reuse of historic windows is not feasible, replacement
windows will be approved by the HPC prior to construction of the windows.
Plaza asked if there needs to be written approval from SHPO. Gertz responded
SHPO needs to approve the plans.
Adams asked if the motion implies that SHPO has to grant approval. Gertz stated
no, it is not implied.
AMENDED MOTION: Gilbertson moved, seconded by Mackay, to approve the
plans dated 3-13-2006 submitted by Friendship Ventures for Edenwood Center
Dormitory and Dining Hall Buildings of the historic Glen Lake Children's Camp,
with the following condition: if reuse of historic windows is not feasible,
replacement windows will be approved by the HPC and SHPO prior to
construction of the windows. Motion carried 7-0.
Eden Prairie Heritage Preservation Commission
March 20, 2006
Page 8
Van Sickle, Bailey, and Stracke departed the meeting at 8:17 p.m.
V. REPORTS OF COMMISSION AND STAFF
None.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
A. CLG GRANT UPDATE
Gertz stated the current CLG grant application will be reviewed by the grants
review committee on March 30. He feels confident they will get the grant for the
reuse study for the Cummins-Grill House project.
Gertz stated the grant staff is working on now is on track to be completed at the
end of July.
Adams suggested she would like to schedule visits to the three sites prior to a
meeting.
Adams asked if the HPC meeting could be held at a different location. Gertz
stated yes, as long as it has to be posted 5 days prior.
Amell questioned whether all three sites can be covered at once. Gertz stated
another option is to put together a PowerPoint presentation on each site and show
it at the next meeting.
Mackay stated if individuals need to see the sites, perhaps they can see them
individually.
Gertz stated he will provide contact information to the HPC members so they can
schedule their visits on their own.
B. CUMMINS HOUSE PROJECT UPDATE
Gertz reported the ice box is demolished. The site has been excavated and
footings will be poured tomorrow. He stated he met at the site today with
Councilmember Sherri Butcher, Tom Guelcher, and Mark Wickstrom. There are
only two people signed up for the Midwest Preservation Institute's winter class.
Because of that, the class will be pushed back to May 8 when the weather will be
better.
C. EDEN PRAIRIE HISTORY BOOK UPDATE
Gertz reported the memo outlines a timeline for reprinting "The First 100 Years"
by Helen Anderson.
Eden Prairie Heritage Preservation Commission
March 20, 2006
Page 9
Adams stated she would like to thank Barkley and Gilbertson for their
participation on the HPC. Barkley has diligently served on the Commission for
nine years. Gilbertson provided expertise and experience during her service.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Amell moved, seconded by Mackay, to adjourn the meeting. Motion
carried 7-0.
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.