Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 05/26/1987 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION • Tuesday,sday, May 26, 1987 7:30 p.m. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Ed Schuck, Richard Anderson, Julianne Bye, Christine Dodge, Doug Fell , Robert Hallett, Charles Ruebling STAFF MEMBERS: Chris Enger, Director of Planning; Michael Franzen, Senior Planner; Don Uram, Assistant Planner; Kate Karnas, Administrative Assistant Pledge of Allegiance--Roll Call I . APPROVAL OF AGENDA II. MEMBERS REPORTS III. MINUTES IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS (7:35) A. THE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION, by Dirlam Development. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Industrial to Low Density Residential on 6.7 acres and from Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 12.2 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 41.5 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on • 41.5 acres with Zoning District Change from I-Gen to R1-13.5 on 37.7 acres with variances, Preliminary Plat of 41.5 acres into 70 single family lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way. Location: West of Evener Way, South of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad. A continued public hearing. (7:50) B. GOPHER LANE DIVISION, by Patrick G. Bauer. Request for Preliminary Plat of approximately 1.5 acres into 3 single family lots. Location: West of Staring Lane. A public hearing. (8:05) C. TIMBER CREEK WOODS 3RD ADDITION, by Builders Development and Finance. Request for Preliminary Plat of 1.34 acres into 6 single family lots. Location: East of Mistral Lane and South Manor Road. A public hearing. (8:20) D. MAJESTIC OAKS, by All-Land Corporation. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5 acres, Preliminary Plat of 5 acres into 12 single family lots. Location: East of West 168th Avenue, south of Manor Road. A public hearing. (9:05) E. LEGION PARK, by R.M. Feerick & Associates. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial to Community Commercial on 2.9 acres, Zoning District Change from I-2 to Community Commercial on 2.9 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 9.33 acres into 3 lots and 1 outlot with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals for construction of- a 14,400 square foot building. Location: East of County Road #4, north of the Chicago and is Northwestern Transportation Railroad. A public hearing. Agenda May 26, 1987 Page Two (9: 50) F. AMOCO SERVICE STATION, Amoco Oil Company. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial on 0.94 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to C- High way on 0.94 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 0.94 acres into one lot. Location: Southeast corner of Shady Oak Road and Crosstown Highway #62. A public hearing. V. OLD BUSINESS VI . NEW BUSINESS VII. PLANNER'S REPORT VIII . ADJOURNMENT *NOTE: THE TIMES LISTED ABOVE ARE TENTATIVE, AND MAY BE SIGNIFICANTLY EARLIER, OR LATER, THAN LISTED. MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, May 26, 1987 City Council Chambers 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting chairperson, Julianne Bye, Christine Dodge, Douglas Fell, Robert Hallett (9:20 p.m. ), Chuck Ruebling MEMBERS ABSENT: Chairman Ed Schuck, Rich Anderson STAFF PRESENT: Michael Franzen, Senior Planner; Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner; Lois Boettcher, Substitute Recording Secretary Pledge of Allegiance—Roll Call I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Ruebling, to approve the agenda as printed. Motion carried 4-0-0 II. MEMBERS REPORTS None III. MINUTES MOTION: Motion was made by Ruebling, seconded by Dodge to approve the minutes of the May 11, 1987 Planning Commission as printed. Motion carried 3-0-1 (Dodge abstained) IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. THE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION by Dirlam Development. Request for Comprehensive Guide P an Change from Industrial to Low Density Residential on 6.7 acres and from Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 12.2 acres, Planning Unit Development Concept Amendment on 41.5 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 41.5 acres with Zoning District Change from I-Gen to R1-13.5 on 37.7 acres with variance, Preliminary Plat of 41.5 acres into 70 single family lots, one outlot and road right-of-way. Location: West of Evener Way, South of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad. A continued public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes 2 May 26, 1987 Planner Uram introduced Dennis Dirlam of Dirlam Development and explained that this item was continued from the last meeting. Since that time, the developer has made revisions to the plan. Staff's major concern is road access and they feel it is necessary that one of the two roads, Dell Road or Evener Way, already be constructed and the other be under construction, before building permits are issued. Other items on which staff requested revisions before final review were design of Evener Way extension with a minimum 300 foot curve radius, revision of plans to reflect the minimum lot frontage required in the R1-13.5 zoning district on all lots, determine the appropriate sanitary sewer alternative and receive engineering approval, revision of plans to depict the continuation of the 5 foot concrete sidewalk and 8 foot bituminous trail and submission of a traffic study update. Mr. Dirlam reported that after meeting with Gene Dietz, the center line curve radius at the intersection of Dell Road and Evener Way has been increased from 115 feet to 230 feet. To determine the impact the development would have on traffic, a study was done and it was determined that this development reduced the number of trips from 1910 to 1430. In addition, six variances from lot frontage were eliminated and the number of lots has been reduced from 70 to 69 because of the redesign of the roadway. The sanitary sewer proposal has been changed to utilize a lift station in this project with a force main connection to an 8 inch sanitary sewer line on Evener Way. The grading plan has been altered slightly and any trees removed will be subject to 100% replacement by the developer. Petitions will be submitted for the construction of Dell Road and Evener Way and the developer will submit a landscape plan prior to Council review. Chairman Bye asked for questions from the Planning Commission. Fell referred to the letter from Police Captain Clark and the crime prevention specialist and asked if all safety related items have been addressed. Planner Uram stated that the major concern regarding safety in this development are access points. Fell asked if it is unusual for have a development reviewed by the, city police. Planner Uram answered that in this case, staff asked the police to provide their input and added that no construction could be done until Dell Road and Evener Way are constructed. Fell said he feels it is a good idea to get input from the police on crime prevention and safety. Ruebling asked if the 300' curve radius versus the 230, curve radius will require a variance. Planner Uram said it will not require a variance and was suggested by Gene Dietz for this particular case only. Chairperson'Bye asked for questions or comments from the audience. There were none. Planning Commission Minutes 3 May 26, 1187 Mr. Dirlam commented that he would like to be able to continue working with staff to obtain access for this development, as a number of homes will be completed by the winter months and he would like occupancy to be possible by this time. Planner Uram said that staff will continue to work with Mr. Dirlam on access points. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Dodge to close the public hearing. Ruebling commented that the only problem with the extension of Evener Way is the sewer system connection. Planner Uram said that this problem has been solved through the connection in Lorence Way. Evener Way may or may not be a problem, but this will be addressed at the City Council level. The motion was seconded by Fell. Motion carried 4-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Dirlam Development for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial to Low Density Residential on 6.7 acres and from Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 12.2 acres, for the Ridge 2nd Addition, based on revised plans dated May 15, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 22, 1987. Motion passed 4-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Dirlam Development for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 41.5 acres for the Ridge 2nd Addition, based on revised plans dated May 15, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 22, 1987. Motion passed 4-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request by Dirlam Development for Planned Unit Development District Review with variances and Zoning District Change from I-Gen to R1-13.5 on 37.7 acres for the Ridge 2nd Addition, based on revised plans dated May 15, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 22, 1987. Motion passed 4-0-0 • Planning Commission Minutes 4 May 26, 1987 : MOTION 5: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Dirlam Development for Preliminary Plat of 41.5 acres into 70 single family lots and one outlot, for the Ridge 2nd Addition, based on revised plans dated May 15, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 22, 1987. Motion passed 4-0-0 B. GOPHER LANE DIVVISION, by Patrick G. Bauer. Request for Preliminary Plat of approximately 1.5 acres into 3 single family lots. Location: West of Staring Lane. A public hearing. Planner Uram introduced Mr. Frank Cardarelle representing Patrick Bauer. The site plan depicts a subdivision of 1.72 acres into three single family lots. Mr. Cardarelle's major concern is the lack of sewer and water service on Staring Lane. A special assessment agreement is required with the City for the upgrading of East Staring Lane including water and sewer service and the developer will submit plans for review. Mr. Cardarelle agreed with all staff recommendations. He added that only small trees are located on the site with shrubs around the existing house. The trees will not be removed and the plan is a relatively simple one. MOTION 1: Motion made by Ruebling, seconded by Fell to close the public hearing. Motion passed 4-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion made by Ruebling, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Patrick G. Bauer for Preliminary Plat of 1.5 acres into three single family lots, based on plans dated April 7, 1987. Motion passed 4-0-0 C. TIMBER CREEK WOODS 3RD ADDITION, by Builders Development and Finance. Request for Preliminary Plat of 1.34 acres into 6 single family lots. Location: East of Mistral Lane and South Manor Road. A public hearing. Planner Franzen explained that the developer is requesting the replatting of existing lots at the building setback in order to accommodate more desirable homes and maintain minimum setback requirements. Both lot sizes and street frontages conform to City requirements. Staff recommends approval subject to the developer vacating drainage utility easements and the payment of cash park fees. Planning Commission Minutes 5 May 26, 1987 Chairman Bye asked for questions from the Planning Commission. Ruebling asked that since this site has been platted before, do cash park fees have to be paid again. Planner Franzen said cash park fees are only paid when building permits are issued. Dodge asked about the price range of homes in this area. Planner Franzen said that the prices will be similar to homes already located here. The developer is also required to comply with the City's architectural policy for small lots. MOTION 1: Motion made by Dodge, seconded by Ruebling to close the public hearing. Motion passed 4-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion made by Dodge, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Builders Development and Finance for Preliminary Plat of 1.34 acres into six single family lots for Timber Creek Woods 3rd Addition, based on plans dated May 21, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff report dated May 22, 1987. Motion passed 4-0-0 • D. MAJESTIC OAKS, by All-Land Corporation. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5 acres, Preliminary Plat of 5 acres into 12 single family lots. Location: East of West 168th Avenue, south of Manor Road. A public hearing. Planner Franzen introduced Mr. Steve Pellinen of Hanson, Thorp, Pellinen and Olson, civil engineering consultants for the developer. Mr. Pellinen explained that this development is an extension of Purgatory Ridge to the north. Mr. Pellinen discussed the rationale that was used to in developing the modified cul-de-sac including topography and drainage requirements. He added that there are other constraints on the site including the existing home and the barn which will be remodeled and 40 feet added on to the east side. It will then be converted into a home site. If road alignment ties into 168th St. to the west, it was found that the developer will only be able to obtain nine lots instead of the 11 referred to in the staff report. If the road is moved to the north, the developer will be able to get ten lots on the site. Planner Franzen explained that the subdivision to the north was originally called Rembrandt Ridge, but was changed to Purgatory Ridge when changes were made in the development. He added that there are two alternate ways to provide access with a road connection to the south to South Manor Road or up to 168th St. Franzen explained that current City Council policy is to eliminate unnecessary cul-de-sacs and to encourage the use of through streets and connection of neighborhoods. The issue is not the number of lots or density, but providing for good access and circulation. Franzen added that both the Fire Marshal and the City Engineer have reviewed this plan and recommended a through street. Planning Commission Minutes 6 May 26, 1987 . Mr. Pellinen stated that the roadway should not be constructed so headlights shine into neighboring homes. He added that the ponding requirement is part of the overall drainage plan which covers 15 to 20 acres. One of the restrictions on the site is the detention pond and there are other restraints because of existing houses. Corrine Lewis of 16740 N. Manor Road told the Planning Commission that a petition was circulated in her neighborhood approving of the cul-de-sac in the Majestic Oaks development. All residents signed the petition with the exception of one who works for the City and did not feel it was appropriate to sign. Ruebling asked what the rationale is for the residents to feel so strongly in favor of a cul-de-sac. Ms. Lewis said that four policemen live on this street and they cited examples of three arrests recently which they feel could not have been done without a cul-de-sac. She added that the residents feel it is safer to live on a cul-de-sac since the traffic goes at a much slower rate of speed. Robert Blunt of 6501 W. 168th St. said that his street used to be peaceful, but has turned into a racetrack. The addition of another street would be very dangerous. Mr. Blunt asked if a road study has been done in this area. Planner Franzen said that nothing has been done recently. Dodge said she does not like Alternative #1 and feels this would be the most difficult to accomplish. Ruebling commented that when looking at a map of the area, he assumes the original design is similar to Alternative #1. Planner Franzen said that when Mr. Moot built his house, the Board of Appeals required that he locate his house so it could be subdivided in the future with an east west connection from Timber Creek subdivision to 168th St. . Ruebling said he assumes the Moot house is not interfering with the original design. Planner Franzen replied that this is correct. Ruebling said his understanding is that if Alternative #1 is used and the property is subdivided to the south, the road can still go directly through with lots located on both sides. Planner Franzen replied that this is correct. Ms. Lewis commented that it would be difficult to sell lots adjacent to a ponding area. She feels that locating the pond in the middle of the street is a good idea. Chairman Bye asked who is responsible for maintaining the pond. Planner Franzen said that if the pond were located within road right-of-way, it would be the City's responsibility. Planning Commission Minutes 7 May 26J 1987 Chairman Bye asked what the City ordinance is for cul-de-sac length. Planner Franzen said that the ordinance indicates they should not be longer than 500 feet. Ruebling asked how long this cul-de-sac would be. Planner Franzen said it would be 1000 feet long. Ruebling said he is reluctant to approve a cul-de-sac of this length without a contingency plan for a road connection in the future. Gary Mundahl of 16659 N. Manor Road asked what percentage of existing cul-de-sacs exceed 500 feet in length and if the length of the cul-de- sac is the primary issue. Chairman Bye said that because of topography, trees, lakes, railroads, etc. , cul-de-sacs are often approved, but in this situation there are no major constraints which would prohibit a through road connection. Mr. Mundahl asked how accessibility issues can be balanced with the safety of small children in the area who make use of the street as a play area. Dodge replied that she has small children and lives on a through street. - Children should not be allowed to play in the street and she feels children playing on a cul-de-sac can still get hurt because they pay very little attention to cars. Dodge added that the City is considering sidewalks in all neighborhoods because of safety. Fell said that if Alternative #2 were accepted, people living in Purgatory Ridge close to 168th St. could actually have the amount of traffic reduced. Fell added that one of the problems the police currently have is finding the correct house number when they get a call. They prefer a through street because they don't have to turn around as they do on a cul-de-sac. Ruebling said that for safety reasons, a loop should be created. Most of the traffic would be neighborhood traffic and he feels that two access points are important, especially if one was blocked. Dodge asked about sidewalks in this area. Planner Franzen said that in some situations the City has required sidewalks because of increased traffic associated with a new development. Bye said that she previously lived on a long cul-de-sac and that only one access can be very difficult, especially in winter. She added that she likes Alternative #2 with the possibility of a through street in the future. Bye said she is hesitant about adding three more driveways on 168th St. and feels it would be appropriate to have the Public Safety Department review this project. Ruebling said he cannot recommend a permanent cul-de-sac, but that if it were possible to have a through street in the future, he would support this. • Planning Commission Minutes 8 May 26, 1987 Fell said that based on the staff report, the existing cul-de-sac exists on the site because the road was planned to eventually connect to 168th St. Fell added that he would like a review by public safety and continue discussion on this item. Mr. Mundahl asked if the safety issue has come up before regarding cul- de-sacs and the commission is acting on previous experience. Bye replied that the safety issue has come up before. Ruebling said that residents may not realize that there will actually be less traffic with two access points since traffic will be distributed rather than all traffic from this project being channeled through the existing neighborhood. Mark Lewis of 16740 N. Manor Road said that he has talked to his neighbors who feel that the integrity of the neighborhood should be protected and a road connecting to 168th St. would not accomplish this. The residents also want to preserve the value of their homes and a through street would not be beneficial to future buyers. Mr. Lewis questioned if the cul-de-sac were only 500 feet long if there would be as much of a problem. Mr. John Stenson of 6530 168th Ave. said that if Alternative #2 is chosen, headlights will be shining directly into his house. This street is already very.fast and he has already fenced in the yard. Mr. Stenson feels the safety aspects of living on a cul-de-sac greatly outweigh any other problems. Mr. Pellinen commented that topography is one of the primary reasons for constructing a cul-de-sac. One of the constraints to developing this site is the property to the south. Any variation of Alternative #1 would require the removal of one lot, the road would have to be raised and the developer would lose ponding in the middle. The only other place for ponding is at the rear road lines which is not a good solution from a drainage standpoint. Another constraint is that the property is ony 328 feet wide and since the ordinance requiresd 85 feet for street frontage only a nine lot plan could be developed with a road connection to the south. A solution similar to Alternative #2 would not meet setback requirements since there is not enough room between Mr. Blunt's deck and the existing barn. Planner Franzen asked which alternative, the construction of a through street to the south or making a connection to 168th St. , would require the most grading work. Mr. Pellinen said the through street would require more grading. Dodge asked about the time frame involved on this issue. Ms. Lewis said there are some lot sales contingent upon the road construction. Planning Commission Minutes 9 May 26, 1987 MOTION: Motion made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to direct staff to confer with public safety regarding road alignment and the construction of a cul-de- sac in the Majestic Oaks Development and to publish this item for the June 16 Council meeting. Ruebling said he would like specific discussion at the June 8 meeting regarding the through street and the costs involved. He realizes this is a problem site. Motion passed 4-0-0 E. LEGION PARK, by R.M. Feerick & Associates. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial to Community Commercial on 2.9 acres, Zoning District Change from I-2 to Community Commercial on 2.9 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 9.33 acres into 3 lots and 1 outlot with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals for construction of a 14,400 square foot building. Location: East of County Road #4, north of the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Railroad. A public hearing. Planner Uram introduced Mr. Dick Feerick and Mr. Dan O'Brien, architect for the developer. Mr. Feerick said the design is within existing zoning requirements and the best solution for the site is a consolidated • access from County Road 4. He concurs with the staff report and recommendations. Dennis Bertrand, 18111 Priory Lane, Minnetonka, was present at the meeting representing the American Legion. Mr. Bertrand reviewed the goal of the American Legion which is service to the community, state and nation. He added that the town meetings used to be held at the Legion and the members have donated time, effort and financing for many worthwhile projects in Eden Prairie. He believes the new facility will better serve the City in the future. Mr. Bertrand added that the Firemen's Ball or other non-profit organizations could hold activities there. Mr. O'Brien said the American Legion is staying on its present site because they have been there for many years and the area has been serving them well. The site is being expanded adjacent to the railroad tracks. Mr. O'Brien reviewed the site plan for the building which will be a two story structure, the top floor being similar to the existing building with dining and drinking areas, room for large groups and a kitchen. The lower level will be used as a banquet area. The two levels will be separate and distinct with two different entrances and the Legion will share an access with the adjacent property. Mr. O'Brien said the reason for a cul-de-sac here is the need for a wider street to accommodate Planning Commission Minutes 10 May 26, 1987 emergency vehicles and for ample circulation through the site. The parking lot will be set up to allow for turning radius of bus traffic and emergency vehicles. One of Staff's concerns is screening from County Road 4. Mr. O'Brien said that there is a large amount of green space in the middle of the parking lot, in the perimeter and around the building to screen the area from County Road 4. Landscaping will consist of a variety of coniferous trees and deciduous shrubs. Signage will be located on the building. Primary building materials include facebrick, glass, metal fascia and rock face block. Mechanical equipment on the building will be screened. Planner Uram asked for a review of the proposal for demolition of the existing building. Mr. O'Brien replied that the old building will remain in use while the new building is under construction. The upper level only will be ready for occupancy when the old building is demolished and then construction will be completed. Planner Uram added that the American Legion received a building permit in 1953 and has been at this location since then. Since 1982, the American Legion has been operating on a non-conforming use within the Indsutrial Zoning district. Staff requests that the developer revise the grading to reflect maximum berm heights along County Road 4, revise the landscape plan to reflect additional evergreen trees adjacent to County Road 4 to help screen views into the parking lot, that prior to development on the remaining industrial parcels, the proponent be required to go through a site plan review process with the Planning Commission and City Council and that they apply for and receive approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals for the variances as pointed out in the staff report. He added that staff is somewhat concerned with the parking lot lighting and how glare from these lights will affect residential areas. Fell asked what effect the larger group banquets would have on traffic. Planner Uram replied that a traffic study was not done. Dodge commented that she likes the project and feels it will be a good addition to the community. The only problem is the traffic on County Road 4. Planner Uram said that improvements to County Road 4 should be done during 1988. Bye commented that most banquet functions will not be held during prime traffic time, but asked how many parking spaces will be on the site. Mr. O'Brien said that the number of parking spaces is based on the occupancy of the building which is 535 and is figured at a rate of three seats per car. He added that the building won't be fully occupied often and that they are confident with the amount of parking that will be provided. Planning Commission Minutes 11 May 26, 1987 Hallett asked if the Legion will be in competition with other businesses in Eden Prairie and if they have had any comments from them. Mr. Bertrand said that the Legion has worked well with the community and is not in competition with the other establishments. He added that the Legion believes in free enterprise and it is not their intent to undercut prices so other businesses cannot service Eden Prairie. Eden Prairie is growing and there is enough demand so other businesses will also do well. The Legion's principal income will not be derived from serving the public. Ruebling asked if staff is comfortable with the variances requested by the Legion. Planner Uram said that although I-General zoning does not meet standards at this point, there are possible alternatives for the industrial areas in order to meet minimum requirements. Ruebling asked if there would be appropriate commercial use for the adjacent property. Planner Uram said the property is guided Industrial. Bye commented that there is some industrial use already in the area. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell to close the public hearing. Motion passed 4-0-1 (Hallett abstained) MOTION 2: . Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of R.M. Feerick and Associates for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial' to Community Commercial on 2.9 acres for the Legion Park, based on plans and written materials dated April 28, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of May 22, 1987. Motion passed 4-0-1 (Hallett abstained) MOTION 3: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of R.M. Feerick and Associates for Zoning District Change from I-2 to Community Commercial on 2.9 acres for the Legion Park, based on plans and written materials dated April 28, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 22, 1987. Motion passed 4-0-1 (Hallett abstained) Planning Commission Minutes 12 May 26, 1987 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City COuncil approval of the request of R.M. Feerick and Associates for Preliminary Plat of 9.33 acres into three lots and one outlot for the Legion Park, based on plans and written materials dated April 28, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 22, 1987. Motion passed 4-0-1 (Hallett abstained) F. AMOCO SERVICE STATION, Amoco Oil Company. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial on 0.94 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Highway on 0.94 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 0.94 acres into one lot. Location: Southeast corner of Shady Oak Road and Crosstown Highway #62. A public hearing. Planner Franzen introduced Mr. Jim Phillippe who reviewed the development plan. Mr. Phillippe reported that the county has changed their plans regarding intersection alignment and the original site is being condemned for right-of-way. He said the building will be identical to the one on Anderson Lakes Parkway and will be constructed of glazed brick with a mansard. The reason for the 32 foot driveway width is to allow for the turning radius of semis. Mr. Phillippe asked for consideration on height of landscaping in order that vehicles passing by will be able to see the sign. He added that the developer has no problem with staffs recommendations on lighting, rooftop mechanical screening or assessments. Planner Franzen said that revisions have been made on the grading and landscape plan and requested that the developer present turning radius data in order for staff to consider the wider driveway. He added that the sign must be revised to meet minimum setback requirements and the ordinance for size of sign surface. A special assessment agreement will be required for eventual upgrading of the frontage road. MOTION 1: Motion made by Ruebling, seconded by Dodge, to close the public hearing. Motion passed 5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion made by Ruebling, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Amoco Oil Company for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial on 0.94 acre, based on plans dated April 24, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 22, 1987. Motion passed 5-0-0 Planning Commission Minutes 13 May 26, 1987 MOTION 3: Motion made by Ruebling, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Amoco Oil Company for Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Highway on 0.94 acre, based on plans dated April 24, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 22, 1987. Motion passed 5-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion made by Ruebling seconded by Dodge, to recommend to- the City Council approval of the request of Amoco Oil Company for Preliminary Plat of 0.94 acre into one lot for a service station, based on plans dated April 24, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 22, 1987. Motion passed 5-0-0 V. OLD BUSINESS Dodge asked if there would be a possibility to reformat the order in which discussions are handled at the Planning Commission meetings. Since the public is always last to speak, they may feel the commission has already made up their mind on issues before hearing the public's comments. Suggested order would be proponent, staff, public and commission. It was the consensus of the members of the commission that this would be a good idea. Planning Commission Minutes 14 May 27, 1987 VI. NEW BUSINESS Bye said she feels it would be a good idea for the Planning Commission to have a special meeting with the City Council since there are new members in both groups. Hallett concurred. VII. PLANNER'S REPORT None VII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Hallett, seconded by Fell. Chairman Bye adjourned the meeting at 10:10 p.m.