HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 04/27/1989 - Board of Review APPROVED MINUTES
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIL
BOARD OF REVIEbJ
THURSDAY, APRIL 27, 1989 7: 30 PM, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE
BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS: Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, and
Douglas, Tenpas
BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF: City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Assessor teve Sinell . City Staff
Appraisers Lorna Lisell, John .Sams, Barb
Cook, Earl Zent, Rick Petersburg and
Dean Jacobs, Hennepin County
Representative Ray Shudy, and Recording
Secretary Jan Nelson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIAUCE
( ROLL CALL: President of the Board Gary Peterson was absent .
�1
I . CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Board Member Richard Anderson called the meeting to order .
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this meeting had been properly
published in the Eden Prairie News ; notice of the meeting was also
included with each valuation notice sent to homeowners .
Jullie said the purpose of this meeting was to allow any taxpayer
to come before the Board of Review to request that the Board act to
amend the classification or property valuation which the City
Assessor and his Staff determined to be appropriate to that
property.
Jullie said that the Board of Review will reconvene at a later
date to hear any appeals continued from tonight 's meeting .
I I . ORDER OF BUSINESS
A. Personal Appeals
I . CECIL MA14TIN - 6585 Eden Prairie Road -
#04-116-22 23 Ui050
tir . Martin asked for clarification of the City ' s appeal
process . City Manager Jullie described the process to
him. Mr . Martin said he thought it was unfair that he
Board of Review 2 April 27, 1989
was being assessed this year for double the amount of the
lot . He said only 1-112 acres is usable while the
assessors said it was two acres.
Pidcock asked about the value of the land. Flartin
replied that it was $32, 000 last year and that it
increased to $64, 000 this year . He said he would accept
a $40,000 value on the land, but not $64, 000 .
Tenpas asked how the property was configured. Martin
said it was an old farmstead with swampland, County Rd . "
4 and Rainbow Drive and another residence around him.
Martin said he had always paid a little larger amount
on the land because it is somewhat larger .
R
City Assessor Sinell said the property is a 4. 7 acne
site improved with a house. He said the total value of i
the property is *84, 000, including land and buildings .
The 1988 value was $65, 300. He said he would like to
have this referred back to staff for further
evaluation. Martin noted that most of the property is
floodplain.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Martin property, PID 04-116-22 23 0050, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
i
2. ROBERT DUNCAN - 9134 Fox Run Circle -
#24-116-22 31 0104
Mr. Duncan was not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Duncan property, PID 24-116-22 31 0104, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
3. ROBERT HENDRICKSON - 17355 Pioneer. Trail -
#20-116-22 33 0007 l #29-116-22 22 0004
Mr . Hendrickson was not present .
MOTIO14: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to .refer
the Hendrickson property, PID 20-116-22 33 0007 and
PIV 29-116-22 22 0004, to staff for further review .
Motion carried unanimously .
4 . DONALD ATKIt4S - 9580 Eden Prairie Road -
#29-116-22 12 OOU6
Mr . Atkins said this .residence was on green acres for
five year prior to this but they were taken off this
year . He said they do farm 650 acres altogether .
tie said his taxes will increase about $3, 000 this year.
Board of Review 3 April 27, 1989
Sinell said they will be working with the County
Assessor ' s office on reviewing green acres applications
and would like to have it referred back to staff.
MOTION : Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Atkins property, PID 29-116-22 12 0006, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
5. MICHAEL MCNAMARA - 10260-10270 Tarn Circle -
#24-116-22 43 0038
Mr. . McNamara said he had discussed 1989 valuations
with three realtor.. s in the last month and they said
valuations went up in Eden Prairie about 17%. He
said he thought the valuation should be the same as
last year .
Pidcock asked if this was a twin home. McNamara said
it was a townhouse that backs up to Anderson Lakes
Parkway and that he has been unable to sell it for
some time .
Harris asked what the valuation was last year. .
McNamara said it was about $169, 000. Sinell said the
value assigned was $174, 000 which, upon appeal, was
reduced by the Local Board to $167, 000. On further
appeal to the County Board, it was reduced to $158,000.
He said the 1989 trended valuation was $163, 300.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer.
the McNamara property, PID 24-116-22 43 0038, to staff
for further_ review. Motion carried unanimously .
6. MICHAEL & LISA RYAN - 16792 Whittington Walk-
#05-116-22 12 0029
Mr. . Ryan said he felt the assessment was too high as
he has had considerable construction damage to trees
on his property. He said the trees were valued at
$31, 000 and he will have to take them down . He said
a consulting arborist valued the trees at that amount .
Tenpas asked if the value was based on replacement
with identical trees . Ryan said that was true .
Tenpas asked what the assessed value was in 1988.
Sinell said it was $188, 500. Sinell said he
would like this referred back to staff.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Ryan property, PID 05-116-22 12 0029. to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
Board of Review 4 April 27 , 1989
A
Anderson asked Sinell if the presence of oak and p
elm trees affected the valuation of property . Sinell
said they have not been able to measure a difference
in market value if some of the trees on a wooded lot
die even though there was considerable expense to the
owner to remove the trees.
7 . & RAYMOND STODOLA - 6625 Eden Prairie Rd . -
8. #05-116-22 41 0004 and #05-116-22 41 0068
Mr. . Stodola showed an illustration of his property .
Lie said the valuation of the second parcel went from
$5, 300 to $20, 000 and he was protesting that valua-
tion since it is primarily floodplain. He said he
purchased the land in 1960 for $22, 500 and this year
the valuation has jumped $46, 600 in only one
year .
Sinell asked if he was dropping his appeal on the
parcel with the house on it . Stodola said he
would if he got the other. one .reduced.
Tenpas asked what last year ' s valuation on the
homestead property was . Sineli said it was $80, 400.
f
/ MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust
the valuation on the Stodola property, PID 05-116-22
41 0004, to $7, 000. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTIO14: Harris moved, seconded by Tenpas, to sustain
the Assessor ' s estimated market value on the Stodola
property, PID 05-116-22 41 0068. Motion carried
unanimously.
9. JOHN & ELLEN KERBER - 18424 Twilight Trail -
#07-116-22 31 0042
Mr. . Kerber said this was assessed at $181 , 700 a year
ago. He had an appraisal on his home for some
refinancing and was told that his home would sell
for $175, 000. He said this year ' s value went up
to $194, 200. Another independent appraisal was done
in the last week which showed the value of the
property staying the same or actually going down
from last year ' s value . He said he was protesting
the use of new construction to determine resale
values.
Sinell said he would disagree that single family
homes are going down or staying the same. He said
he would like to have the property referred to
staff and would like to see Mr. . Kerber 's most
recent appraisal of the property.
I
b
Board of Review 5 April 27, 1989
r
Anderson asked if the valuations for loans have a
bearing . Sinell said the appraisal is only as
good as the date of the appraisal. fie said they
would look at sales for. 1989 and compare it with
his current appraisal .
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to
adjust the valuation on the Kerber property, PID
07-116-22 31 0042, to $181, 7UO. Motion carried
z
unanimously.
i
10. FREDERICK & CATHLEEN KING - 9766 Archer Lane -
0 25-116-22 14 0060
Mrs. King said they paid $127, 000 {$130, 000 with-
out points ) for their house in December. of 1987.
She said the house needs a lot of work . She said
last year ' s notice must have gone to the pr. iar
owner as she would not have agreed with the $136, 500
valuation last year either. She said the 1989 value
is $141, 000 . She said similar properties in the
neighborhood are taxed less and she thought the
house could be sold for. only $133, 000 at this time.
( Sinell asked if any of the repairs have been made .
King said the house* is not in as good condition as
others in the neighborhood and they have not done any
repairs as yet .
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer.
the King property, PID 25-116-22 14 OD60, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
11 . JAMES BROWN - 11551 Riverview Road -
#35-116-22 14 0001
Mr. . Brown said the estimated market value on his
property went up 70% this year . He said the
assessor told him it was the land value that went
up. fie said he bought the property for less than
$1, 000 in 1955. He said last year 's valuation was
$118, 5O0 and this year 's is $201, 500.
Harris asked how much land he has Brown said it is
approximately 1. 3 acres.
MOTION: Harris moved to refer the Brown property
to staff for further review.
Motion died for lack of a second .
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to
adjust the valuation on the Brown property, PID
35-116-22 14 U0O1, to $125,000.
13oard of Review 6 April 27, 1989
Sinell said properties in superior locations in
Eden Prairie have seen dramatic rises in market
value. He said reducing this property in this
manner would mean it was comparable to homes in
other areas that do not have such superior loca-
tions .
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Pidcock and Tenpas voted "aye, "
Anderson voted "nay, " and Harris abstained. 14otion
failed.
Anderson said he opposed the. motion because values
of the properties along the bluffs would have to be
opened if the motion were to pass . Harris said she
abstained because she did not have enough information
to put a value on this property.
Tenpas said the increases in property taxes have
become ridiculous and the values along the bluffs
are all inflated. He said people who have lived in
this area for a long time suffer from a tax struc-
ture based on the state level.
( Pidcock said the high values on the bluffs is just
hearsay in her estimation as she has no concrete
evidence of such high values.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris , to
refer the Brown property. PID 35-116-22 14 0001 ,
to staff for further review. Motion carried unanimously .
Pidcock said she would suggest that staff, in their
review, keep in mind the sentiments expressed at the
meeting tonight .
12 . WILLIAM QUIRK - 14308 Charing Cross -
#03-116-22 32 0051
Mr. Quirk said he thought the valuation of his property
should be $112, 100, based on a 6% increase in value from
the 1988 value of $97,600 and improvements to the
prop-erty for which he paid $8, 625.
A
Sinell said they have started a market comparison and
would like it to be referred back to complete that
comparison.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to .refer the
Quirk property, PID 03-116-22 32 0051, to staff for
(Y further. review. Motion carried unanimously .
13 . DONALD POUPARD - 6251 Beach Road - #03-116-22 11 0001
and 003-116-12 11 0002
Board of Review 7 April 27, 1989
Mr . Poupard was not present.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Poupard property, PZDs 03-116-22 11 0001 and
03-116-22 11 0002, to staff for further review.
Motion carried unanimously .
14. DAVID & JEAN KELLEY - 10260 Summer. Place - a.
#35-1.16-22 12 0012
Mr . Kelley said he objected to any increase in value
to his home. He said he lives in a small development
off Homeward Hills Road and is faced with the threat
of expansion of Flying Cloud Airport and the continu-
ing problem with the landfill . He said there are
five homes in the development that are for sale and
some have been on the market for almost a year.
He said the value, at best, has stayed the same.
Sineil said the property was purchased in 1987 for
$419, 000. He said the home has 4240 square feet and
has an attached three-car garage . He asked that it
be referred back .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Kelley property, PID 35-116-22 12 0012, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
15. LEONARD KODET - 6536 Eden Prairie Road
#04-116-22 23 0039
Mr. . Kodet was not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Kodet property, PID 04-116-22 23 0039, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
16. JEFFREY & PENNY TAYLOR - 9489 Abbott Court -
#26-116-22 12 0020
The Taylors were not present.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Taylor. property, PID 26-116-22 12 0020, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
17. ANTHONY HIRT - 6533 Kurtz Lane - 'r04-liG-22 24 0049
Mr . Hirt said he questioned what constitutes lakeshore
as his property was reclassified as lakeshore. He
showed photographs of the area that was classified as
a lake.
k
Board of Review £3 April 27, 1989
Sinell said this property classification hasn ' t been
used before this year. , but the County Assessor insists
that we now use the classification so he can measure
whether properties that have a lake influence are
treated the same as properties that don ' t have such
an influence. He said the tax is calculated the same
on both classifications . He said they checked with
the Parks Department to see what bodies of water in
the City would be classified as lakes .
F
Tenpas asked what the valuation was in 1988. Sinell
said it was $86, 300 and this year it is $91, 500.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the dirt property, PID 04-116-22 24 0049, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
16. WILLIAM BECKFELD - 6631 Kingston Drive -
#03-116-22 32 0021
Mr . Beckfeld said his house is 32 years old and the
valuation has gone up 21% in the last two years .
He said the houses around them are valued at around
$100, 000 and are larger in size than his. He asked
Ir if someone come out and take a look at the house.
f He said he would just like to have it valued equally
l to the houses around him.
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Beckfeld property, PID 03-116-22 32 0021, to staff
for further review. Motion ce -ried unanimously.
19. PHILIP BLY 6 BRENDA URKE - 10720 Cty. Rd. #18 -
#36-116-22 41 0010
Ms Ur.ke said their property was valued at $6, 500 in
1988 and is now valued at $27, 500 . She said it is
under a conservation easement, thus they cannot do
anything with the property other than pay taxes on it .
Sinell said this property adjoins their homestead
property and is in the floodplain area off Riverview
Road. He said they have reviewed properties that
are in the floodplain and would recommend that this
valuation be reduced to $10, 000.
Tenpas askew what happened to increase it from $6, 500
to $10, 000. Sinell said those properties were all
in the revaluation area. In looking back to what the
U.N. R. was willing to pay for floodplain when they
had money available, they arrived at a value of 52, 000
per acre for the floodplain properties .
Board of Review 9 April 27, 1989
r
Harris asked if the land is developable. Sinell said
it is not developable because of its location in the
fluodplain ; however, it is a positive amenity and is
usable by the owners of the property.
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the
valuation on the Bly & Urke property, PID 36-116-22 41
0010, to $6, 500. Motion carried unanimously.
a
20. JOHN & LINDA HOFFER - 8711 Meadowvale Dr . -
#21-116-22 22 0031
Mr. . Hoffer said paid $23,900 for his lot and in the
past year, two lots nearby have sold for only a little
more than that . Ile said there is no sewer and water
in the neighborhood now but it will be coming. He
said their property has been valued at $30, 000 which
is the same as lots near his property that are much
more desirable . He said he thought the value should
be in the $25, 000 range.
Sinell said this is a new home that was built and
its value is $152,300 this year for both land and
building. He asked that it be referred to staff for
review.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Hoffer property, PID 21-l16-22 22 0031, to staff
for further review of the lot valuation. Motion carried
unanimously.
21 . & VIRGIL SEIFERT - 8390 Hiawatha Ave . - #16-116-22 43
22. 0002 and #21-116-22 11 0020
Mr. Seifert was not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Siefert properties, PIDs 16-116-22 43 0002 and
21-116-22 11 0020, to staff for further review.
Motion carried unanimously .
23. W. J. LASESKI - 12155 Riverview Road - #35-116-22
24 0002
Mrs . Laseski said she is questioning the valuation
of the lot that increased from $87, 000 to $152, 000
this year . She said it is about 325 feet wide, with
a 150-foot easement for the NSP power lines going
through the center of it .
Tenpas asked how long they had lived in the house.
Laseski replied ten years.
Board of Review 10 April 27 , 1989
CSinell asked if this was the secondary parcel, not
the parcel with the house . Laseski said it was.
Sinell said this is a 17. 33 acre site that does
have the the power line going through it. Fie said
he would recommend the value be reduced to $122, 900 to
take into consideration the reduction in value of
the floodplain land to $2, 000 an acre. He said they
would also recommend that the two other Laseski
properties be reduced by $200 and $10, 600 (0011 and
0001 ) .
Tenpas asked what the total increase from 1988 to
1989. Sinell said 90011 went from $46, 800 to
$92, 300 and V0001 went from $214, 500 to $299, 500.
He said the total increase was $195, 100 or 56%.
MOTION: Tenpas moved , seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Laseski property, PID 35-116-22 24 0002, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
24 .& BOYD & JEAN JONES - 9416 & 9424 Clubhouse Road -
25 . #25-116-22 21 OU18 and #25-116-22 21 0019
Mr. Jones said he has his home for sale and has had
no showings as yet. He said they pay almost double
what the properties close to them pay. He said
the resale value of doubles has gone down consider-
ably since the tax adjustatents made them less attrac-
tive .
Tenpas asked if his property was on the golf course .
Jones said it was but that several of the others
he was talking about were also on the golf course.
Tenpas then asked what the 1988 valuation was . Jones
said it was $178, 000 and $133, 000. Tenpas asked if
the units were identical. Jones said the $178, 000
property is nicer_ than the other one.
Harris asked for clarification on the valuation
figures . Sinell said 9416 Clubhouse had an estimated
market value for. 1989 and 1988 of $171, 400. He said
the smaller unit had a 1989 valuation of $158, 400 and
was the same in 1988.
Sinell saidd they have sold comparables and would
dike the opportunity to complete a market review.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Jones property, PIDs 25-116-22 21 0018 and
25-116-22 21 00190 to staff for further. review.
Motion carried unanimously.
r
25A. JOH14 & SANDRA PIDDE - 14995 Williamsburg Court -
Board of Review 11 April 27, 1989
#16-116-22 43 0017
The Piddes were not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to
r.efe.r. the Pidde property, PID 16-116-22 43 0017,
to staff for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
26 . DELAVAN & FRANCES DYE - 14405 Fairway Drive -
#U9-116-22 41 0092
i
Mr. . Dye said he happens to live on the floodplain in
Fairway Woods where many residents had to pay for
repairs from the flood in 1987 . He said some of the
property is selling for $55, 000 today. He said he
had asked for a .relief culvert under Mitchell Road
in 1955 which was never. done. He said their property
has depreciated in value because of the floodplain.
Anderson asked if he was requesting a reduction in
his valuation. Dye said he was .
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Dye property, PID 09-116-22 41 0092, to staff
for fu,r. ther. review. Motion carried unanimously.
27 . T1iOMAS & JACQUELINE SKELLEY - 6832 Charis Court. -
#06-116-22 33 0074
Mr . Skelley said he was concerned that he had barely
purchased the property before it was valued at $7, 000
to $8,000 more than he paid for it . He referred to an
appraisal he got at the time he bought it .
Tenpas asked if he had bought the home in June of
1988 with a purchase price of $164, 500. Skelley said
that was correct .
Sinell said this was a new construction appraisal in
1988 and stays the same as 1989. He said a market
comparison done in 1988 after Mr. . Skelley filed a
request for review of value with the county supported
a value in excess of $172, 700. He asked that they
be allowed to update the market comparison.
MOT IOth Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust the
valuation on the Skelley property, PID 06-116-22 33 0074,
to $164, 500. Motion carried unanimously .
28. JEFFREY ERICKSOC,i 10117 Phaeton Drive -
( #26-116-22 44 0018
Sinell said Mr. . Erickson notified the appraiser before
the meeting that he would accept a reduction from
Board of Review 12 April 27, 1989
$362, 300 to $337, 800.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to accept
the staff recommendation to adjust the valuation on
the Erickson property, PID 26-116-22 44 0018, to
$337, 800. Motion carried unanimously.
29. MRS . HELEN F014L.ER - 10315 Riverview Road -
136-116-22 43 0003
Mrs . Fowler was not present .
Sinell said he would recommend a reduction on this
property to $311, 300 because it has a substantial
portion in floodplan.
MOTIO14 : Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer.
the Fowler. property, PID 36-116-22 43 0003, to staff
for. further review. Motion carried unanimously .
30. MARK & MARY JO KIMITC - 11961 Pendleton Court -
#35-116-22 12 0071
1
Mr. Kimitch said that the location of his property
near the dump, the airport and the power lines has
adversely affected the value. He said they had an
[ appraisal done last fall after they had finished
their basement which determined they could realis-
tically expect between $122, 000-$125, 000.
Sinell said this neighborhood was revalued in 1989.
lie said they would like this returned to staff for.
review .
Tenpas asked what the 1988 value for 1988. Sinell
replied that it was $104, 700.
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust the
valuation on the Kimitch property, PID 35-116-22
12 0071, to $114, 000. Motion carried unanimously.
31. JOHN & KIMBERLY POLLOCK III - 9563 Woodridge Dr . -
#26-116-22 22 0063
Mr . Pollock said his property is adjacent to County Rd . 1
and a cemetery and he did not think the value should
be increased the same as those around him. Eie said
his house has been on the market for six weeks and
has had only one offer at $100,000 .
Sinell said the appraiser inspected the property today
and would like to have time to complete the appraisal .
{
board of Review 13 April 27, 1989
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer. the
Pollock property, PID 26-116-22 22 OOG3, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried with Tenpas
opposed.
32. EDGAR RAJEK - 6253 Har. bor.ough Ct . - #05-116-22 12 002G &
#05-116-22 21 0042
Mr. . Rajek said they are the oldest residents of Chat-
ham Wood. He said there is a freeway planned for this
area . They also suffered a house fire in October 1986 �
which required $100, 000 in repairs. Fie said they will
have to disclose that repair work because of the dis-
closure laws. He said the 1985 appraisal was $210, 000
and an $18, 000 increase this year was outrageous He
said he believes the house is worth $210,000 at this
time .
Tenpas asked how many square feet were in Rajek ' s house.
Rajek said it was 2650.
Sinell said it was 2570 and that they have not been
able to document through resales of property that the
proposed freeway has lessened the values . j
Tenpas asked what the 1988 valuation was . Rajek said
it was $201, 100 on the major parcel . Pidcock
asked if he thought $204, 000 would be fair . Rajek said
he did.
MOTION: Teripas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust the
valuation on the Rejak properties, PIDs 05-116-22 12 0026
& 05-116-22 21 0042, to a total of $210, 000 for the two
parcels. Motion carried unanimously.
33. ROBERT VUJOVICH - 9697 Brigliton Lane - #25-116-22
11 0112
Mr. Vujovich said his property is a zero-lot line twin
home. He said he objected to the adjustment for func-
tional utility. He handed out a list of comparables for
reference.
Sinell said the appraiser had started a review of the
property and they would like to complete that . Sinell
asked him about his definition of functional value.
Vujovich said he was looking for a value range.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Vujovich property, PID 25-116-22 11 0112, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
34. KENr MOLDE - 7040 6iillow Creek Road - 102-116-22
44 0016
0oard of Review 14 April 27, 1989
1
Mr. . Molde said he felt they are paying a penalty be-
cause of an unusual design feature of their house.
He said they have a concrete-block rumpus room that
extends for two stories inside the house. He said
their house is valued $40, 000 to $50, 000 higher than
houses on Bryant Lake. He said his valuation is
currently $327, 000 while most of the lakefront is
in the $230, 000 to $270, 000 range .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Molde property, PID 02-116-22 44 0016, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
35. CLIFFORD THOMPSON - 6559 Kurtz Lane -
#04-llb-22 24 0050
I.9r. . Thompson said his problem was the same as Mr. .
Hir. t 's in that his property valuation increased
$13, 000. He said the assessor told hire the property
was raised because it was lakeshore property. Fie
said he 'has a 14-foot easement between his property
and the lakeshor.e.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to refer
the Thompson property, PID 04-116-22 24 0050, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
36. MARLOWE ANDERSON - 6254 Harbor.ough Court - 05-116-22
21 0040
Air. Anderson said they had just finished building the
house. He said the square footage is an issue--the
builder says it is 2143 but the house specs say it is
2300 to 2400 square feet. He said he thought there
were errors in the evaluation of the property. He
also questioned why the appraisers don ' t check out
the house at closing time . He also said the freeway
proposal will adversely affect his value. He said he
would like a 20% reduction in the valuation because of
the problems he outlined .
Tenpas asked how his house compared to Mr. . Rajek ' s.
Anderson said it is smaller .
Sinell said the assessor ' s office has never been able
to get inside the house; therefore, the appraisal was
based on that could be seen from the street.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer.
the Anderson property, PID 05-116-22 21 0040, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
37. RICHARD KFIJG - 16270 N. Hillcrest Court -
Board of Review 15 April 27, 1989
#08-116-22 11 0049
Mr_ . King was not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the King property, PID 08-116-22 11 0049, to staff
for further_ review. Motion carried unanimously .
38. TIMOTHY PELTIER - 8218 Hiawatha Ave. -
#16-116-22 42 0005
Mr. Peltier was not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Peltier. property, PID 16-116-22 42 0005, to staff
for further. revier. . Motion carried unanimously.
39. CLARENCE MCCONVILLE 13244 Kerry Lane -
#10-116-22 12 0064
Mr. . McConville said he was asking the Board to consider
that the market valve assigned is $183, 600 while the
actual market value for sales purposes is $176, 000.
That means the actual valuation should be $162, 800.
He said he bought the property on March 14 for $176, 000.
Sinell said the owner has not let the assessing staff
in the house.
MOTION: Harris mowed, seconded by Anderson, to adjust
the valuation on the McConville property, PID 10-116-22
12 0064, to $176, 000 .
AMENDMENT TO THE MOTI014: Pidcock moved, seconded by
Tenpas, to adjust the valuation to $174, 000.
VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT: Motion carried unanimously.
VOTE ON THE tiOTION: Motion carried unanimously .
40. HENRY BRANDT - 12300 Ri,?erview Rd . -
#35-116-22 24 0010
#35-116-22 24 0007
#35-116-22 24 0008
#35-116-22 24 0009
Mr . Brandt was not present .
MOTION: Harris moved , seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the following Brandt properties to staff for further
( � review:
�.h PID 35-116-22 24 0010
35- 116-22 24 0007
Board of Review 16 April 27 , 1989
35-116-22 24 0008
35-116-22 24 0005 ,
Motion carried unanimously.
41 . STEVEN STENSGAARD - 6544 Eden Prairie Road -
#04-116-22 23 0040 {
Mr . Stensgaard said his property is on County Rd . 4
and their value has decreased. His property is
identical to Mr . Kodet " s . He said bath properties
have been for sale and could not have sold for more
than $89, 000. He said the valuation is $99, 000.
Sinell said a preliminary appraisal agrees that the
valuation should be reduced to $89,000.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock , to adjust
the valuation on the Stensgaa.-d property, PID 04-116-22
23 0040, to $89, 000. Motion carried unanimously .
42 . LORRAINE & DARRELL DILLIVG - 11441 Riverview Rd. -
#35-116-22 14 0003
Mr . Dilling said he has a one acre lot with a 1467 square
T foot house. He said his valuation increase this year.
' is more than what he paid for the house and lot.
He said there have been no improvements to the house .
He then reviewed the values of several lots along
Riverview Road.
At this point Boardmember Harris left the meeting .
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock , to refer.
the Dilling property, PID 35-116-22 14 0003, to staf f
for further review. Motion carried.
43 . DANIEL & SHERYL COSTIGAN - 9640 Squire Lane - 025-116-22
14 0020
The Costigans were not present .
At this point Boardmember Harris returned .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, :seconded by Tenpas , to refer
the Costigan property, PID 25-116-22 14 0020, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
44. AUDRAE DIESTLER - 9905 Bluff Road - ;#36-116-22
14 0001
Ms Diestler was not present .
Board of Review 17 April 27, 1989
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock to refer
the Diestler property, PID 36-116-22 14 UUbl , to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
45. MICHAEL & HEIDI SPEAK - 17161 South Shore Lane -
#08-116-22 21 CJ33
The Speaks were not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tenpas, to refer
the Speak property, PID 06-116-22 21 0033, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
46. BRUCE & PATRICIA BETTEMMAN - 7551-7555 Bittersweet Dr . -
#09-116-22 31 0049
Ms . Betterman said the property is a rental investment
she purchased five years ago. Since then it has
decreased in value . She said she has had a negative
cash flow since the day she bought it. She has been
told by realtor. s that she will have to take a large
loss if she sells it . She presented sales information
from the neighborhood showing values below her
assessed market value. She also presented a letter from
a realtor that showed a value less than the valuation.
Sinell said this was a recent appeal and they would
like to do a review of the property .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Betterman property, PID 09-116-22 31 0049, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously .
47. JOHN BERRY DAVIS - 9303 Talus Circle - #24-116-22
43 0036
Mr . Davis said similar_ homes in his neighborhood have
lower valuations than his . He said he didn 't want to
pay more than his fair share of taxes . He said he
thought a fair valuation would be $159, 000 to $164, 000.
He said some of the homes in his neighborhood that
are on the market have not sold so it is difficult to
determine market value.
Sinell said this was part of a revaluation areas . fie
said they have not had a chance to discuss this with Mr .
Davis so he asked that it be referred back to staff .
NOTION: Harris moved , seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Davis property, PID 24-116-22 43 0036, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
48. FARAMARZ & MARY TAJADOD - 18808 Twilight Trail -
#07-116-22 32 OU97
Board of Review 18 April 27, 1989
The Tajadods were not present .
MOT 10 t-J: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock , to refer.
the Tajadod property, PID 07-116-22 32 0097, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
49. & GRETCHEN SALYARDS 15824 & 15816 Park Terrace Dr.
50. #04-116-22 32 0008 0009
Ms Salyards was not present .
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock , to refer,
the Salyards properties, PIDs 04-116-22 32 0008 and
04-116-22 32 0009, to staff for further review.
Motion carried unanimously.
51 . JOHN JENKINS - 3780 Flesher Circle - #22-116-22
24 0004
Mr . Jenkins said his property was 27 years old and
that they added a room in 1987 . He said their
valuation jumped from $123, 000 to $165, 500 after
the addition. He said this year ' s valuation is
$179, 700 even though nothing more has been done to
the house. He couldn ' t believe that the value could
jump that much, partly because of the Centex develop-
ment next to him.
Sinell said this is a 5. 1 acre site improved with a
2730 square foot rambler. He said the 1988 valuation
included an increase for partial completion of the
addition.
Tenpas asked what the cost of the addition was . Mr .
Jenkins said it was close to $42, 000.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tenpas, to adjust
the valuation on the Jenkins property, PID 22-116-22
24 0004, to $165, 500. Motion carried unanimously.
52. GARY WAGNER - 7296 'Gerard Drive - #11-116-22
23 0044
Mr. Wagner said his 1988 valuation went up $3, 900 and
the 1989 valuation went up $16, 700. He said he
thought $21 , 600 in two years was excessive for their
location near the freeway. He said the assessor
compared property values in Cardinal Hills with those
in nis. Topview area. He said a house in his neighbor-
hood sold in 1985 at $115, 000 and it had 1, 000 square
feet more than his house. fie said they have no improve-
ments such as curb and gutter or storm sewers . He played
a tape with freeway noise in his yard.
Board of Review 19 April 27. 1989
r
Sinell said they haven ' t done a review appraisal . He
said it was part of their revaluation area but they
were not able to get into the house. He said they
would like to do a review.
MOTI014: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Wagner property, PID 11-116-22 23 0044, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
Anderson noted that there have been other complaints
about noise in that area since the freeway ramp was
constructed and he thought there should be some
discussion on that issue .
53. DONALD SABINSKE - 7740 Heritage Road - #08-116-22
33 0010
Mr . Sabinske was not present.
MOTION: Barris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Sabinske property, PID 08-116122 33 0010, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
54. DENNIS DIRLAM - 15421 Cr_ eekside Court - #09-116-22
21 0015
Mr. . Dir_ lam said he had a 32% increase in valuation
this year, or. about $50, O00. He said his neighbors
received increases from 0-15%. He said he didn' t
understand that amount of difference. He said he
thought an increase similar to his neighbors would
have been more fair. .
Pidcock asked what the 1968 valuation was . Dir. lam
said it was $163, 700.
Sinell said they would like a chance to review this
property as yesterday was the first day they knew
Mr. . Cir. lam thought the value was wrong.
Pidcock said she thought they should consider what
the banks use as criteria for appraisal--that it
must be within a half mile radius and must be closed
within the last six months to be comparable.
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust
the valuation on the Dirlam property, PID 09-116-22
21 Ou15, to $179, 300.
� f
Anderson said he didn ' t think one day was enough time
for staff to investigate and take a good look at n
valuations in the area.
1,
Board of Review 20 April 27, 1989
f
VOTE ON THE mariou: Motion carried with Anderson
opposed.
55 . Dc' NIEL & PHYLLIS JOHNSON - 15421-23 Trillium Cir. . -
-09-116-22 31 0011
Mr. . Johnson said his property is a double bungalow and
passed around a picture of a similar property that
sold for. $132, 210. He asked that his valuation be
lowered to the same figure.
Sinell said they had not had an opportunity to discuss
this and would like to review it.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer_
the Johnson property, PID 09-116-22 31 0011, to staff
for further review.
r
Pidcock asked if staff had been in the building at all .
Sinell said he reviewed it in 1984 and 1979.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
56. ROBERT & BONNIE JOHNSON - 7626 Carnelian La. -
*, 008-116-22 31 0011
The Johnsons were not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer.
the Johnson property, PID 08-116-22 31 0011, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
57. SCOTT SODERBERG & CATHY LUCAS - 15700 Park Terrace Dr. -
#04-116-22 32 0019
Neither party was present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, sec led by Harris, to refer.
the Soderberg and Lucas property, PID 04-116-22
32 0019, to staff for further. review. Motion carried
unanimously.
58. JAMES MCNEILL - 7251 Willow Creek Road - #12-116-22
22 0006
Sinell said Mr. . McNeill was not able to attend the
meeting but they have been in discussion with him and
have a review half completed .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer_
the McNeill property, PID 12-116-22 22 0006, to staff
- for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
59. ROBERT WIENS - 16468 Manor Road S. - #05-116-22 �
Board of Review 21 April 27, 1989
(� 14 0057
Mr. . Wiens said 'he thought his valuation of $150, 000
was high so he did some comparisons. He said five
very comparable homes near his have an average of
$128, 400 valuation. He showed pictures of the
comparable homes.
Sinell said a complete market evaluation was done
in 1988 and a valuation of $150, 000 was arrived at
as of December 13, 1988. He asked the Board to
sustain the valuation.
MOTIO14: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust
the valuation on the Wiens property, PID 05-116-22
14 0057, to $128, 3+00. Motion carried unanimously.
60. STEFAi4IE & MARVIN SEGAL - 11062 Mt. Curve Road -
#24-116-22 33 0005
The Segals were not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tenpas, to refer.
the Segal property, PID 24-116-22 33 0005, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
61. JAY DARISH - 10430 Buckingham Dr . - #25-116-22 31 0034
Mr. Dar. ish was not present .
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Darish property, PID 25-116-22 31 0034, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
62. SCOTT & DEBRA SCOFIELD - 10823 Spoon Ridge -
iF25-116-22 32 0020
The Scofields were not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer.
the Scofield property, PID 25-116-22 32 0020, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
63 . TRACY JOHANSEN - 7261 Tartan Curve - #07-116-22
24 0018
tds Johansen was not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer.
the Johansen property, PID 07-116-22 24 0018, to staff
r for further review. I-lotion carried unanimously.
` 64. FRED PURCELL - 8610 Red Oak Drive - 021-116-22
22 0024
Board of Review 22 April 27, 1989
Mr. . Purcell said his market value started increasing
ten years ago . He said the City told him it was because
of the development . lie said he should have protested
more back then as values now are way out of line. He
said his value is $151, 300 and a house next to him sold
for $100, 000. He said he had an offer of $104,000 for
his property in January and another shortly after_ that
for $112, 000. He said he thought his valuation was
$31, 000 high based on the two offers he received and
other sales in his neighborhood .
Sinell said this property was part of the revaluation
area in 1986. He said they offered to do a. review of
the property but Mr. . Purcell declined.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Purcell property, PID 21 -116-22 22 0024, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried with Tenpas opposed .
65. CHARLES KOSHL•'NINA - 10541 E. Riverview Dr. - 035-116-22
13 0033
Mrs. Koshenina said their valuation went from $133, 600
to $257, 000 in one year . She said they have a 33-year
old rambler on a little over one acre of land. He
said there was one sold comparison near them that
sold 16 manths ago for. $190, 000 . She said she under-
stood that the valuation of the lot is what caused the
increase this year. . She thought it was invalid to
give the same value to a lot with an existing older
home - that is given to an empty lot on which a new and
more expensive home will be built . The rule is that
the land value should be no more than 1/4 to 1/3 of
the total package and their land is valued at more than
their. house . She said she thought such a large increase
in valuation should be phased in over several years
gather than in one year. .
Anderson said he thought there is a problem with the
properties along Riverview Road and staff clearly will
have to take a look at it .
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Koshenina property, PID 35-116-22 13 U033, to
staff for further review. 1dotion carried unanimously.
66. MICHAEL & MARIE DUNN - 9044 Preserve alvd. - ;#23-116-22
42 0062
The Dunns were not present .
MOTION. Pidcock moved, seconded by Tenpas, to refer.
the Dunn property, PID 23-116-22 42 0062, to staff
Board of Review 23 April 27, 1989
I'
for further review . Motion carried unanimously.
67 . PENTTI LEHTONEN - 10220 Summer Place - #35-116-22
12 0014
Mr . Lehtonen said he has a valuation of $440, 800 on
his property. He said neighboring properties are
much less than his. One of the homes is for sale
at $262, 000. He said he would like to lower his
stated estimate to $320, 000.
t
Sinell said they have not had a chance to review
this property as Mr. . Lehtonen just filed the appeal
this afternoon.
1-1071ON Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer_
the Lehtonen property, PID 35-116-22 12 0014, to
staff for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
68. CURTIS BOTKO - 7036 Willow Creek Road - #U2-116-22
44 0004
Mr. . Botko was not present .
l MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Iiotko property, PID 02-116-22 44 0004, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
69. DAVID BULLOCK - 6436 Fallbrook Road - #02-116-22
13 0012
Mr. Bullock was not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Bullock property, PID 02-116-22 13 0012, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
70. HUSTAD DEV. - (100 properties)
A representative of Hustad Development was not
present .
MOTION.* Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Hustad Development properties (PIDs listed on
appeal #70 attached) to staff for further review .
Motion carried unanimously.
71 . DEtINIS TRUEMPI - 19097 'rwilight Trail - #07-11G-22
32 0047
Mr. . Truempi was not present .
r
- MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Tr. uempi property, PID 07-116-22 32 0047, to staff
Board of Review 24 April 27, 1989
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
72 . LARRY DOUGHERTY - 16700 N . Manor. Road - x05-116-22
13 0011
Mr . Dougherty was not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Dougherty property, PID 05-116-22 13 0011, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
At this point the Board considered additional appeals
filed during the meeting .
73 . EUGENE PETERSEN - 7443 Hames Way - $08-116-22
32 0050
Mr. . Petersen said he felt his •ialuation was $30, 000
higher_ than it should be. He said he had the house
on the market last year and the only reasonable offer
for the property was $134, 000. He said the valuation
is $157, 400 for 1989.
Anderson asked if he had talked to staff . Petersen
Csaid he would be happy to have the assessor come out .
MOT'IOW: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Peterson property, PID 08-116-22 32 0050, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously .
74. BIHARI DESAI - 16587 Terr. ey Pine Dr. . - 417-116-22
12 0058
Mr.. Desai said he bought two twin homes in the City
and he is disputing the valuation of one valued at
$76, 400. He said he had the second highest valuation
on the block last year and had pointed that out to the
assessors at that time.
Sin-ell said the 1988 valuation was set at $72, 900.
Mr. . Desai appealed to the County through the abatement
process and they approved the valuation .
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust
the valuation of the Desai property, PID 17-116-22
12 0058, to $72, 90U. Motion carried unanimously.
75 . i•1ARVIN & MAGDALEN MILLER - 7293 Gerard Dr. . -
&11-11b-22 23 U022
Mr. . Miller said his valuation went up $14, 000 to
$117, 200. tie said they had it appraised at $94, 000.
He said the noise in their yard is much greater than
in Wagner ' s .
Board of Review 25 April 27, 1989
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock , to refer
the Miller. property, PID 11-116-22 23 0022, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
76. WARREN PASCHKE - 1444i Village ►foods Dr . -
421-116-22 11 0019
Mr. . Paschke said the lot was valued at about $26,000 4
when they bought it in November. of 1987. He said it
is now valued at $37, 000. He said adjacent properties
are valued at $25, 000 and $30, UUO. He said the re-
alignment of Mitchell Road will bring the traffic
much closer to his property.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Paschke property, PID 21-116-22 11 0019, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
77. BRENDA URKE - 10720 County Road 413 - f36-116-22
41 0007
Ms Urke was iiot present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer_
the Luke property, PID 36-116-22 41 0007, to staff
for further. review. Motion carried unanimously.
78. JEROME MARCOTTE - 9305 Talus Cir. - #25-116-22 12 0093
Mr. . Marcotte was not present .
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer.
the Marcotte property, PID 25-116-22 12 0093 to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Written Communications
Written communications were received from the following
and are attached to these Minutes .
1001 . HAROLD KERN - 15301-03 Trillium Cir .. - #U9-116-22
31 UU19
1002. JO11N & SUSAN ORTON - 16760 South Shore La .
#05-116-22 43 0004
1003. HARRIET HEUTMAK]E:R - 9554 Grey Widgeon Place -
f27-116-22 11 U034
1UU4. WILLIAhi JELLISON - 9560 Highview Ur . - #30-116-22
22 0016
Board of Review 26 April 27, 1989
r
1OU5. ALFRL:D HENDERSON - 9443 Clubhouse Rd. -
#25-116-22 21 0010
1006. DIXON JONES - 7541-45 Bittersweet Dr . -
#09-116-22 31 0048
1007. DIXON J014ES - 7501 Bittersweet Dr. . - v09-116-22
31 0091
1008. DIXON JONES - 7505 Bittersweet Dr. . - 909-116-22
31 0092
1009. THOMAS & MARY SCH:VARTZ - 7333 Ann Lane -
#11-116-22 23 0026
1010. GARRY & HELEv ANDERSON - 11845 Runnel Circle -
#26-116-22 42 0029
fi
1011 . ROBERT & GEN GI3SOt4 - 15737 N. Cedar Ridge Read -
#21-116-22 23 0009
{
1012. ANN FOWLER HAGGERTY -- 9495 Clubhouse Road -
#25-116-22 21 0037 u
P
1013. BARRY & DIANE BAIN - 9845 Bluff Road -
#36-116-22 14 0004
1014. CLAIR & LORNA BUDKE, 10550 W. Riverview Dr . -
#35-116-22 13 0OU3
1015. HARLEY & ELIZABLTIi BERGREN - 10812 Mount Curve Rd . -
v25-116-22 22 0024
1016. SAMUEL & DIANE KNIGHTON - 11792 Welters Way -
#26-116-22 12 0014
1017. DONALD & JUDY HASSELD - 12944 Cardinal Creek Rd . -
003-116-22 41 0024
1018. LOWELL GREEN - 9935 Friar Dr . - #25-11G-22
13 0038
101.9 . OILLIAM & JANICE HORBOWY - 10298 Hooer Lane -
#35-116-22 21 0098
1020. JAMES MCCRACKEN - 12655 Roberts Drive -
#11-116-22 23 0002
1021 . KL1'.,4 1L:'rn & CAROL TRAVILLA - 12870 Gerard Dr. . -
#10-116-22 11 U031
1022 . JAMLS & LORI OLSON -- 16581 Ashby La .
405-116-22 12 0040
Board of Review 27 April 27, 1989
1023 . WILLIA14 MUCK - 9965 Friar Dr . - #25-116-22 13 0037
1024 . R. L. RASMUSSEN - 1543G Village Woods Dr. . -
#16-116-22 34 OU39
1025 . ROGER BATES & AMY HAUTMA14 - 9551 Riverview Rd. -
936-116-22 44 0004
1026 . WILLIAMM SCHWARTZ - 15051 Scenic Heights Road
#16-116-22 42 0036
1027 . BRYAN & LYNN CARLSON WEBER - 11405 Mount Curve Rd. -
#23-116-22 44 0021
1028. DOUGLAS & NAINCY HARRIS-HELTNE - 6278 Chasewood Dr. . -
#02-116-22 21 0022
1029 . ROBERT & MITZI MIKELSON - 11742 Mount Curve Rd . -
#23-116 22 43 0019
1030. STEVEN & SALLY MELDAHL - 9415 Olympia Dr. -
#26-116-22 11 0006
1031 . WILLIAM & COLEEN MCHALE - 12237 Chadwick La. -
#02-116-22 21 0026
1032 . GE CAPITAL FLEET SERVICE - Three Gelco Dr_ . -
#13-116-22 13 U005
1033 . WILLIAMM fiALVERSTAD'P & ASSOC. - 6500 Flying Cloud
Dr . - #01-116-22 13 0031
1034. E. & P. ENTERPRISES - 7934 Wallace Road -
#16-116-22 21 0030
1035. PRESERVE PLACE APT, - #24-116-22 22 0025
1036. HOWARD TUTTLE - 9976 Balmoral Lane - #25-116-22
41 0063
1037 . STEPHEN & CAROL WYARD - 8741 Black Maple Dr . -
#24-116-22 21 0016
1038. R0 3ER & PATRICIA ACKLEY - 16776 Whittington Walk -
405-116-22 12 0033
1039. MRS . C. W. MCCARTNEY 7700 Washington Ave .
#12-116-22 44 0001
1040. EDENVALL GOLF COURSE - #09-116-22 41 0002,
404-116-22 44 0001, #lU-116-22 32 U049, wU9-116-22
11 0003, #09-116-22 43 OU11
1041 . DENNIS NESBITT - 16546 Ter. r. ey Pine Dr . -
7
Board of Review 28 April 27, 1989
#17-116-22 12 0077
1042. EUGE14E HEIER - 9816 Crestwood Terrace -
#30-11G-22 13 0022
1043. EUGENE KOCH - 13955 Forest Hill Road - #10-116-22
21 0040
1044. EARL HOUGHTOLI - 9795 Bluff Road - #36-116-22
14 0005
s
1045. ROBERT & KATHLEEN GILMAN - 10661 Mount Curve Rd .
425-116-22 22 0032
1046. GREG & BARBARA HEDLUND 11412 Mount Curve Road -
423-116-22 44 001 U
1047 . NANCY & LES STORHA.UG - 9503 Highview Dr . -
#03-116-22 22 0010
1048. TH014AS & DIANE BRA14DABUR - 12235 Oxbow Dr .
*26-116-22 31 0014
1049 . JAMES CULLEN - 15381 Creekside Court -
409-116-22 21 0008
t 1050 . PAULINE HOLT - 11772 Mount Curve Road -
023-116-22 43 0020
1051 . RAVI KACKER - 8729 Bentwaod Dr . - #24-116-22
21 0029
1052 . RAVI KACKER - 10475 Buckingham Dr . - #25-116-22
31 0016
1053 . DANIEL HERGOTT - #12-116-22 14 0017
1054. DEAL) LONGSYO & MARCELLA DEA14 - 9448 C.r_eekwood Dr . -
#26-116-22 22 0010
1055. LOREN WUTTKE - #29-116-22 34 0002, *29-116-22
43 0007 & 0005, #29-116-22 31 OUll
1056. LOREN WUTTKE - #29-116-22 42 0005
MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Harris, to refer the
properties appealed by written communication to staff for
further. review . Motion carried unanimously.
Sinell then asked if the Board would accept additional appeals
after tonight 's meeting. Anderson responded that the appeals
( were to be heard here tonight .
r
Board of Review 29 April 27, 1989
MOTION: Y
Ten as moved, seconded b Pidcock, that no additional
A
appeals would be considered as the deadline for appeals was
April 27th. Motion carried unanimously.
III . CLOSE MEETING
MOTION: Tenpas :roved, seconded by Harris, to reconvene the
Board of Review at 7: 30 PM, Monday, May 15, 1989. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adjourn the
meeting at 12: 45 AM. Motion carried unanimously. r.
x
f
i
L
f