Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 09/16/1986 APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNC IIj TUESDAY , SEPTEMBER 16 , 1986 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOARDROOM COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and Paul Redpath CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J . Jull ie , Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D . Frane , Planning Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert , Director of Public Works Eugene A . Dietz , and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members were present . 4 PRESENTATION OF "AWARD OF VALOR" TO CITIZENS RICHARD BERG AND JOHN SORTLAND , AND PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER JEFF BERG FOR TANKER ACCIDENT ON HIGHWAY #1 9; AND LETTERS OF RECOGNITION TO THE EDEN PRAIRIETIRE DEPARTMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY RESERVES t Mayor Peterson presented Awards of Valor to Richard Berg, John Sort- land and Officer Jeff Berg for their rescue efforts in the fuel tanker accident on Highway 169 the morning of August 19, 1986 . Peterson congratulated and thanked the men on behalf of the residents of Eden Prairie . He also presented a Letter of Commendation to the Eden Prairie Fire Department and a Letter of Recognition to the Public Safety Reserve Unit for their outstanding work during the emergency situation after the accident occurred . I . APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOTION: Anderson moved , seconded by Bentley, to amend the Agenda by adding Item III . Q . Set a Special Meetin of the City_ Council for 7:30 PM on Thursday, September 18 , 1286 , and continuing Item VII . B . Request from Mary Ra c 1 e & Lawrence Ka ustka regarding Goose Hunt at Olympic Hills to the Special Meeting on Thursday, Mayor Peterson and Councilmember Pidcock said they would be late for the meeting on Thursday because of a conflict with the Transit Commission meeting in Chanhassen the same evening. K Peterson said he would appoint Councilmember Redpmtth to serve as acting Mayor in his absence . ,a City Council Minutes -2- September 16, 1986 k The following items were added to the Agenda: X . A . 2. Pidcock - Letter from Sharon Gluschenko regarding stop signs; X . A . 3 . Bentle - Current activities at Welcome Home site ; X . A . 4 . Peterson - Nominations for persons to serve on City Hall Committee . a, The following items were continued to the October 7th meeting: VII . C . Presentation by Nae ele Outdoor Advertising Company on Billboards__ (Nancy Fletcher) ; VII . D . Proposed NSP Trans- mission Line along Hi hwa MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business as amended and published . Motion carried unanimously. II . MINUTES A . Regular City Council Meeting, held Tuesday, August 19, 1986 The following changes were made to the minutes : page 15, paragraph 3 , sentence 3 -- change "a petition from" to "a petition he said was from•' ; page 20, paragraph 6, sentence i -- change "the following recommendations contained in the Staff Report of August 15, 1986." to "the attached Findings and Conclusions on the request prepared by City Attorney Pauly . (Attachment C )"; page 20-21 , delete Items 1 through 5 ; page 25 , paragraph 3, sentence 1 -- change "PM" to "AM" . MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes of the regular City Council meeting held Tues- day, August 19, 1986 , as amended and published . Motion carried unanimously. B . Special City Council Meeting held. Thursday, August 21 , 1986 The following change was made to the minutes : page 2, pars- graph 7 , sentence 1 -- change "thanks' to "ask" . MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath , to approve the Minutes of the special City Council meeting held Thurs- day August 21 , 1986, as amended and published . Motion carried unanimously. III . CONSENT CALENDAR A . Clerk ' s License List B . Approval of Revised Joint Powers Agreement for South Henne- pin Human Services Council City Council Minutes -3- September 16. 1986 C . 1st Reading, of Ordinance No . 49-86 , amendinK City Code Chapter 9 by adding thereto a new Section 9.09 which prohibits the harassment of dogs used for Public Safety p purposes ; and adopting by reference City Coe Chapter 1 and Section 9 .9 , which, among other things, contain pen- alty provisions D . Final plat approval for Meadow Park 2nd Addition Home- ward Hills Road at Sunn brook RoadLj Resolution No . -243 E . Final Plat approval for Luknic Fifth Addition Rowland t Road, west of Old Shady Oak Road , formerly the "Garden" Resolution No . -2 F . Final Plat approval for Windson east extension of Chest- nut Drive Resolution No . -2 5 G. Final Plat approval oval for Gonyeea 5th Addition NE corner TH 5 and CSAH Resolution No . 86-246 H . Approve plans and specifications for Bluffs Vest 5th Addi- tion and vicinity Drainage Im rovements Riverview Road I .C . 2-0 Resolution No . 7 I . Approve plans and s cifications for Riverview Road and Riverview Drive UtilitX and Street Im rovements I .C . 2- 01 Resolution No . - J MINNETONKA STATE BANK, ( "The Bank - Eden Prairie" ) by Robert R . Copeland and Raymond O . Mithun . 2nd Reading of Ordinance #40-86, Rezoning from Rural to Community Commer- cial ; Approval of Developer' s Agreement for Minnetonka State Bank ; and Adoption of Resolution #86-233 , Authorizing Sum- mary of Ordinance #40-86 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 3 .458 acres into one lot for construction of a f Dank building. Location: northeast corner of Highway #5 and County Road #4. (Ordinance #40-86 , Rezoning; Resolu- tion #86-233 , Authorizing Summary and Publication) K . PRAIRIE COURTS , by Ronald A . Christensen. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 39-86-PUD-7-86, Rezoning from Rural to Neighbor- hood Commercial with variances; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Prairie Courts ; and Adoption of Resolution #86-237, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #39-86-PUD-7-86 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary . 3 .7 acres into one lot for construction of a 32,000 sq. ft . commercial center. Location: East of County Road #4, north and west of Wagner Way . (Ordinance #39-86-PUD-7-86; Resolution 06- 2.37, Authorizing Summary and Publication) City Council Minutes -4- September 16 , 1986 L. MEADOWPARK 2ND ADDITION, by Spuds, Inc . 2nd Reading of Ordinance , Rezoning from Rural to R1 -13 .5 on 5 .84 acres and from Rural to Public on 3 .28 acres; Adoption of Resolution #86-238, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #41- 86 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 9.12 acres into 8 lots , one outlot , and road right-of-way for construc- tion of 7 single family lots and Fire Station. Location: East of Homeward Hills Road , north of Sunnybrook Road . (Ordinance #41-86; Resolution #86-238 , Authorizing Summary and Publication) M. BLUESTEM HILLS, by Brown Land Company . 2nd Reading of ordinance -86, Rezoning from Rural to RI -13 .5 on 26 .86 acres; Adoption of Resolution #86-239, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #45-86 and Ordering Publication of Said Sum- mary. 31 .56 acres into 62 single family lots, one outlot , and road right-of-way. Location: South of Bennett Place , north of Purgatory Creek. Ordinance #45-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-239, Authorizing Summary and Publication) N. Change Order for Wyndham Knoll Improvements, I .C . 52-097 0 . Chan e Order for Edenwood and Sin letree Lane Improvements , I .C . 52-011A & B P. Appointment of City representative to South Hennepin Human Services Council to fill unexpired term to IZ31,Z8b R . Set a Special Meeting of the City Council for 7.-30 PM on Thursday, September 18. 1986 Redpath noted that Item B regarding Approval of Revised Joint Powers Agreement for South Hennepin Human Services Council should be for wJIAI}y Vim" of iaciii programs by three of the four parties involved . Bentley asked if, then, the funding for such programs would come from the three cities voting for the program and not from the city voting against it . Redpath said that was correct . x MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Anderson, to change Section 12 of Item B to read -shall first have been approved { by the council of at least three of the four parties, " . Motion carried unanimously. Bentley asked if Item C . 1st Reading of Ordinance No . 49- 86 prohibiting the harassment of dogs used for Public Safety purposes was to cover a loophole in the present ordinance . City Manager Jullie said that was correct . City Council Minutes -5- September 16 . 1986 Anderson asked if this sort of thing was happening. City Attorney Pauly said there had been instances of the dogs being teased while in the car. Anderson asked if the dogs were insured since their value is so high . Pauly said he would doubt that the dogs were covered under the general liability coverage . MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Pidcock, to approve Items A-Q on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unani- mously. IV . PUBLIC HEARINGS A . 1986 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING (Resolution No . 86-228 ) Continued from September 2. 1986 for 4 parcels along Ander- son Lakes Parkway City Manager Jullie noted that this item was continued from the September 2 , 1986 meeting. He said Staff has had con- versations with the owner.-., cf the parcels in question. a k Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the status of the ? objections received to the four parcels excepted from the resolution approved on September 2nd . He said that, be- -, cause of the divisions that occurred on the property, there was $16 ,935 of sanitary sewer assessments on the three par- cels owned by Douglas Corporation that did not benefit that property. He said he would therefore recommend the assess- ment on those three parcels be reduced by a total of $16 ,935 . Arlyn Grussing, representing Douglas Corporation, said that they would agree to the revised assessment . Dietz said he had met with a representative of the Tandem Corporation to discuss the assessment on the fourth parcel and ha3 suggested a cobi rouiise which they did not accept . e He said he was, therefore, recommending that this Public 3 Hcaring be continued until th& October 7th meeting, at which time the review of -che appraisal of the parcel would be presented as a Staff Report with a recommendation to re- solve the issue on the fourth parcel . MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Pidcock, to continue excepted parcel 22-116-22 12 0001 to the October 7th meet- ing. Motion carried unanimously. Anderson asked if that would be within the time line . City Attorney Pauly said it would be 4 MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Pidcock, to adopt a re- vised assessment on -the following three parcels, reducing their total assessment by $16 ,935 .49: City Council Minutes -6- September 16, 1986 22-116-22 14 0003 22-116-22 14 0004 22-116-22 14 0005 Motion carried unanimously. B . J & L SUBDIVISION, by Frank R. Cardarelle . Request for Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13 .$ on approxi- mately three acres with Preliminary Plat of approximately three acres into seven single family lots. Location: Southeast quadrant of Blossom Road and Bennett Place . (Ordinance #47-86 , Rezoning; Resolution #86-240, Prelimi- nary Plat ) City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified . s Frank Cardarelle , proponent , addressed the proposal . Plaruiing Director Enger said the Planning Commission re- viewed this item at their August 25 , 1986 meeting and recommended approval on a 5-0 vote of the request for rezoning and Preliminary Plat, subject to the recommenda- tions in the Staff Report of August 22nd . He said pro- ponent had submitted the recommended petition for a feasi- bility study to upgrade Blossom Road and the proposed street along the eastern property line . He also said that the tree inventory has not been completed but that they are recom- mending this be provided by the time of 2nd Reading. There were no comments from the audience . MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to close J_L 7'1.1..l s r_ ___t. a -&— • t i. D w w.i .. ..`F• fl w7 �i.n.a r^n n 61Le X-UU1 J.0 I1C CL11.J Lr, dJ 1U tW ryivC +riv alouwaitfj v . vt..+ waav . No . 47-86 for Zoning. District Change from R1 -22 to R1 -13 •S - Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No . 86-240, approving the Preliminary Plat of J & L Subdivision for Frank R. Cardarelle . Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Redpath , to direct Staff to prepare a Developer' s Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Anderson asked if, before 2nd Reading, the Staff recom- mendations would be available for review, particularly the tree inventory. Enger said that the tree inventory was I City Council Minutes -7- September 16, 1986 the only recommendation that was outstanding. A general discussion followed regarding tree inventories and tree removal during construction by developers as well as the City. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. C . WILSON LEARNING, by Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc . Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amend- ment on 60 .85 acres, Planned Unit Development District Re- view and Zoning District Amendment with variances within the Office zoning district on 17 .19 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 17 . 19 acres into two lots for construction of a nine-story office building. Location: East of Highway #i69 , west of Valley View Road , south and west of Flying Cloud Drive . (Resolution ##86-241 , PUD Concept Amendment ; Ordi- nance #48-86 , Amending Ordinance #132-84; Resolution #86-242 , Approving Preliminary Plat) City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified . Bill Me Hale , Wayne Bishop, Dick Koppy, and Larry Wilson, representing proponent, addressed the proposal . Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission first reviewed this project at the August 25th meeting and con- tinued it to the September 8th meeting to allow time for additional information on traffic . He said that, at the September 8th meeting, the Commission recommended approval on a 4-0 vote of the PUD Amendment, rezoning and Preliminary Plat, subject to the recommendations in the Staff Report of August 22, 1986 . He referred to his memo of September 5trL Lu the Planning commission and said the Commission also recommended that a restriction be placed on the outlot for the amount of development expected to occur there, depending on the results of a traffic study to be conducted when a proposal is presented for the outl ot. He said that restric- tion was to replace the original Staff recommendation that the undeveloped land area outside that needed for building and parking should be rezoned from Office to Rural . Enger further noted that a traffic study had been done in 1985 for the Vantage Companies that was designed to encom- pass the Major Center Area, and that study indicated there would be problems if the roadways were not upgraded as the area was developed . He said the study recommended that the City make an effort to reduce traffic generation around the Major Center Area, and therefore the Vantage project was required to decrease their originally-proposed development. City Council Minutes -8- September 16 , 1986 s v` Enger said that the projected traffic volume for this project is lower than the original estimates and that it will be within the parameters of the 198j traffic study, including the 20% reduction suggested for the overall Major Center Area . He said , however, that the major concern is with the 6 .5 acre remnant parcel not accounted for and that this problem has not been resolved . Bentleyasked where the production studios would be locat- ed . McHale said their plans are to keep them in the present location. Pidcock asked about the traffic volume being increased by ' the people attending classes in the second floor classroom. McHale said all those people come in by bus . Peterson asked Enger to summarize the Staff position rela- tive to the extra parcel . Enger said they are recommend- ing the Council include in the Developer` s Agreement, which { can be filed against the property, a limitation on the future development of the remnant piece . Enger said that the pro- ponent has a problem with the remnant being returned to Rural zoning, therefore Staff has recommended that proponent return to the City for a site plan review for each individual parcel to be developed on that land . Peterson asked if that meant it would remain zoned as Office with provision for individual parcel site plan review. Enger said that was correct . Anderson asked how many times this sort of thing has occur- red before . Enger said the Hartford project and the Touch of Class building were two examples . Pidnock saiu shie had understood proponent to say that the bank needed all the property to be zoned Office . McHale responded that the deal is structured so that the entire property would be encumbered and that the restriction on future development would be acceptable but the return to Rural zoning would not be acceptable to the New York bank. Peterson asked what kind of accessibility there would be for bus service . McHale said the accessibility is there becau.:e the fire department needs access and that Wilson would have a real interest in keeping the traffic volume low. Enger said the ability to have flexible work hours is a very effective transportation management idea as that avoids additional traffic during the rush hour. Y City Council Minutes -9- September 16, 1986 Anderson asked if the intersection on Valley View Road and Hwy. 169 will be changed . Enger said he thought it had been suggested that the bridge be widened over Hwy. 169. Pidcock said she thought a concern would be whether we are covered if, for some reason, Wilson Learning pulls out and another tenant moves in . Peterson said he thought the building lends itself to a lower occupancy. McHale said the building is designed so that changes would be diffi- cult . Pidcock referred to the letter from Vantage Companies dated September 8, 1986, and asked if their concerns had been satisfied . Enger replied that they were concerned that Vantage was being treated differently from Wilson as they understood they were constrained by daily average trips rather than peak hour trips . He said he reviewed the documents and determined that both firms were being treated exactly the same . He said the same opportunity exists for Vantage to come in with development on individual parcels . There were no comments from the audience . MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 86-241 , approv- ing the Ryan/Wilson Learning PUD Concept Amendment to the overall Wilson Ridge PUD . Motion_ carried with Bentley abstaining. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Red path, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No . 48-86 amending the Ordinance for zoning on the property. Motion carried with Bentley ab- staining. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No . 86-242 , approving -the Preliminary Plat of Wilson Learning for Ryan Construction. Motion carried with f Bentley abstaining. MOTION: Anderson moved , seconded by Pidcock, to direct Staff to prepare a Developer' s Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and including, in recordable form, a covenant which would limit the amount of development on the remnant parcel to no more than 20,000 square feet , subject to the completion of a traffic study in order to substantiate additional development beyond the 20, 000 square foot limitation. Motion carried with Bentley abstaining. i Bentley noted that his abstention was due to a potential business conflict . City Council Minutes -10- September 16 , 1986 D . VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT - MACHINE PRODUCTS PARCEL - WEST OF WASHINGTON AVENUE, NORTH OF HAMILTON AVENUE Reso- lution No . -2 O City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published . Director of Public Works Dietz noted that the utility easement for the parcel is no longer necessary. There were no comments from the audience . MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No . 86-250 for vaca- tion of the utility easement on the Machine Products Parcel , west of Washington Avenue , north of Hamilton Avenue . Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS . 29577 - 29860 Relative to Claim No . 29689 from Brown Photo , Pidcock asked if it would be possible to get a better deal from another company. City Manager Jullie said he believed that we are getting a special rate . Anderson noted that we have instructed Staff to do business within the City . MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos . 29577 - 29860 . Roll call vote: Ander- son. Bentley , Pideock, Redpath and Peterson voted "aye . " Motion carried unanimously . VI . ORDINANCE & RESOLUTIONS There were none . VII . PETITIONS , REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A . Preliminary Plan approval for TH 5 Im rovements between Prairie Center Drive and Heritage Road Resolution No. 86- 2 9 Director of Public Works Dietz described the preliminary layout for the improvement of Hwy . 5 between Prairie Center Drive and Heritage Road and pointed out some of the features on the drawing of the project . He said there would be a median running down the entire length. He said the improve- ments east of Wallace Road are scheduled for construction next summer and the other phase from Wallace Road west would be started in the spring of 1988. I City Council Minutes -li- September 16, 1986 Dietz said there is a contingency plan in case the rail- road is abandoned . He described the property that would be purchased by the State under each of the two alterna- tives (with or without the railroad line ) . He also noted that Hwy. 4 is proposed to be upgraded by the County and he described the plans for the intersection of Hwy. 4 and 5 . He said there is a bike trail proposed on the north side of Hwy . 5 . A discussion followed regarding the effect of the improvements on landscaping along the highway. Bentley asked if there were any changes in the location of the highway on the eastern end near Prairie Center Drive . Dietz said it would not be significantly changed . Anderson asked if there would be a crossing for the trail- way system that runs down to the creek, as there is no pro- vision now for going across Hwy. 5 . Dietz said there was no provision in the current plans but it may be accommo- dated by the plans for Hwy . 212 . Bentley suggested Staff raise the issue with them and point out the potential prob- lem. ! Pidcock asked if there would be any change to the signal \ lights at the intersection of Mitchell Road and Hwy. 5 so that having the sun in your eyes would not be such a prob- a lem. Dietz said there will be changes in that intersection but he was not sure about the plans for the traffic signals . Anderson expressed concern about the intersection at Wallace and asked about the plans for that intersection. Dietz said it will be signalized and widened but he was not sure if there would be provision for a left-turn arrow. Ander- son said he hoped all the intersections would have that and ccSZL-3 ii we would get any input on the subject . Dietz replied that we can say something about it but that the State has guidelines that they go by. Dietz said he would 3 find out if the left-turn arrows are included in the pro- posed improvements . ° Peterson asked what kind of additional encroachment there would be at Prairie Village Mall and the property west of there . Dietz said the construction limits touch the edge of the parking lot but don't go into it . Peterson asked how many lanes there would be from the intersection several hundred yards to the west. Dietz said there would be seven lanes at the intersection and that it then narrows at Car- } nelian. ' City Council Minutes -12- September 16 , 1986 Peterson then noted that the original assumption in 1970 was. that Hwy. 212 would take away the need for Hwy. 5 to be a major road west of Prairie Village Mall . Dietz said he believed the proposed right-of-way width remains the same for that area. Peterson said the increased traffic volume would cause increased noise and encroachment for the nearby► residences . Dietz said that even with Hwy. 212 the traffic volume is expected to increase . A discussion followed regarding the history of planning for Hwy. 5 and the effect on that highway if Hwy . 212 is constructed . Peterson said he objected to losing the greenspace and plantings along; Hwy. 5 . He said that something was happen- ing to us that we hadn't planned on and it is having an adverse effect on the community . I-Ie said that we have planned the community based on the State plans and then they casually change the conditions by not building Hwy. 212 . Redpath said he thought these improvements to Hwy. 5 were considered safety improvements and we would be remiss to riot take this opportunity to improve Hwy . 5 . Pidcock asked if there was anything we could do to force the State to give us more greenspace along the roadway. t Dietz said it would have to come from somewhere . Bentley said he thought we should ask them to look at those places where there will be a landscaping/berming problem and try to find an accommodation that will alleviate the problem. Dietz said there is a possibility of replanting some of the trees in the area where grading has to occur. Anderson said he thought we have an opportunity to make plans to improve the view along Hwy . 5 by berming up on the sides, putting in trees and maintaining the grass, but we must nut it -in the ..i..�,.. vctcr :3 •.a � �� r+.w.•►. ,.••,• . VCiL . via .�7rQ.iL" At %OXI .CIrV we must be as assertive as possible before this gets to the design stage . Anderson noted that the lighting is impor- tant for night traffic . Dietz noted the conditions included in the proposed reso- lution on Hwy . 5 and said that Staff was particularly con- cerned about maintaining the right-in/right-out entrance to Prairie Village Mall as a means of alleviating left- turn traffic at the Hwy. 4 entrance to the shopping center. Peterson said he would like to see Staff review the impacts of encroachment on existing properties and include in the approval the strongest possible request and recommendation that measures be taken to provide approximately the same level of aesthetic quality as presently exists . i City Council Minutes -13- September 16 , 1986 Peterson then asked where the location of the pedestrian overpass would be . Dietz said he thought it would have to be on the east side of Hwy . 4 . Pidcock asked how pedestri- ans would get from the west side of Hwy. 4 . Dietz said that an overpass on Hwy . 4 had been discussed but that the signal light at Driskills should help that situation. MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Pidcock, to adopt Resolution No. 86-249, approving the TH 5 layout, subject to the recommendations from Staff and with additional j recommendations that a crossing for the trailway system be provided on the eastern end of 'he improvements , that left-turn arrows be installed at signalized intersections, and that the same level of aesthetic quality as currently exists be maintained along the highway with such items as berming, tree plantings , grass maintenance and lighting. Motion carried unanimously. B . Request from Mary Radcliffe & Lawrence Kapustka regarding Goose Hunt at Olympic Hills This item was continued to the Special Meeting of the City Council on Thursday, September 18 , 1986 . C . Presentation by Nae ele Outdoor Advertising, Company on Billboards Nancy Fletcher This item was continued to the October 7 , 1986 meeting. D. Proposed NSP Transmission Line along; Highway 5 This item was continued to the October 7 , 1986 meeting. VIII . REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS a A . DEVELOkMENT COMMISSION - Request for Joint meeting with City Counci City Manager Jullie noted the memorandum from the Develop- ment Commission requesting a joint meeting with the Council . MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to set the Joint Meeting with the Development Commission for 6: 00 PM, Tuesday, October 21 , 1986 . Motion carried unanimously. IX . APPOINTMENTS There were no appointments . City Council Minutes -14- September 16 , 1986 Y X . REPORTS OF OFFICERS , BOARDS & COMMISSIONS f A . Reports of Council Members 1 . Charge to Residents ' Committee for City. Administrative . Offices MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath , to approve the charge to the Residents ' Committee for City Adminis- trative Offices , as put forth in the Staff memorandum. Motion carried unanimously . 2 . Pidcock - Letter from Sharon Gluschenko regarding stop s igns Pidcock referred to the letter from Sharon Gluschenko requesting that stop signs be put in on Kristie Lane and Debbie Lane . She asked Director of Public Works Dietz to look into the situation and get back to the Council with recommendations . Dietz noted that he had several such requests and suggested that he would put them all together with a discussion on the desirability of using stop signs for * speed control and get back within a month . 3 . Bentley - Current activities at Welcome Home site Bentley said he had received several calls from resi- dents alarmed about the activities going on at the Welcome Home site . He said that, while $20,000 worth � of improvements was originally planned , it appears that over $100,000 worth may have been done and that there has been no accommodation to any of the concerns raised when the issue was first discussed . He said he wuuid like to Know what is going on over there . He said he is alarmed about the activities and noted that their request made it clear that this was phase one and that they are planning to expand. Redpath asked if Staff was aware of the situation. City Manager Jullie said that Wayne Sanders had a num- ber of concerns that they didn' t seem to know what they were getting into . Bentley said in his opinion what is being done there far exceeds what would qualify to be grandfathered in under the zoning ordinance . Anderson said he would like to have a full report from Staff at the next meeting as to what is going on at that site . City Council Minutes -15- September 16 . 1986 Bentley said his major concern now comes down to access; that is , is there adequate parking and is it going to be accommodated under the rural zoning or under the multiple zoning since they will need a significant amount of parking. He said he thought it should also be fully screened and landscaped . MOTION: Anderson moved , seconded by Bentley, to direct Staff to investigate the activities at the Welcome Home site to determine if those activities were exceeding what is permitted and if there will. be sufficient access and landscaping provided . City Attorney Pauly said there were three areas of con- cern: the screening, the hard-surfacing and widening of the driveway to 24 feet and the issue of setback . He said according to a letter from Mr. Sorenson this was just phase one . He said there has been no permit issued for a second phase . Redpath said he would hate to think the Council would approve the building use but then not let them bring it up to code . ,. Bentley said that his point is that this is a land use question and the degree to which there would be a change to that facility impacts the degree to which it can be considered a pre-existing use . Redpath said he would like to hear from Wayne Sanders and Staff about what is going; on. Anderson called the question. VOTE ON THE MOTION: motion carried unanimously. 4. Peterson - Nominations for persons to serve on City Hall Committee Peterson suggested that nominations be deferred until the City budget meeting. He said he had asked for the entire Council to submit names for consideration and had not received any until two days ago . He suggested that if there are any more names to consider, those people should be contacted to see if they would be willing to serve if nominated . MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Andersonp to con- tinue this item to coincide with the first budget meet- ing. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -16- September 16 , 1986 B. Report of City Manager 1 . Receipt of 1987 City Budget City Manager Jullie suggested a Special Meeting be held on Tuesday, September 23rd to discuss the City budget . MOTION. Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to set a Special Meeting of the City Council for Tuesday, September 23 , 1986, at 6 :00 PM for the purpose of discussing the 1987 City budget and the nominations t for the City Hall committee . Motion carried unani- mously. 2 . City Hall Space Needs City Manager Jullie referred to his memo of Septem- ber 12th summarizing the three alternatives discussed at the last meeting on City Hall space needs . He re- s. viewed the three alternatives presented as to cost and potential problems and/'or benefits . MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Anderson, to adopt the recommendation of the City Manager for Alternate III, leasing space for all City Hall departments and for Council Chambers . Peterson said he thought there was merit in the Alter- mte III recommendation but that there also was merit in Alternate II . He said he was still somewhat in favor of Alternate II for the cost savings it repre- sents, inasmuch as the Citizens' Committee will be making their recommendation in January or February. Anderson said he felt that the importance of the Staff working together and finding other facilities for the Senior Citizens and PROP overshadows some of the extra costs for Alternate III . He said he thought we were fortunate to have found someone who was wilxing to lease a part of the present building, thereby helping with some of the expenses . Bentley said he was in favor of Alternate III on the basis of eliminating the other options . He said even though we are considering a three-year option under Alternate III, it would probably be three years before we could move into a building considering the amount of time it would take for the committee process, refer- endum and construction of a new building. City Council Minutes -17- September 16 , 1986 Pidcock said Alternate II would be her choice , She said she thought there were certain departments that could conveniently be separated without causing undue hardship. Peterson asked if Mr. Jullie could shed any more light on the question of separating the Staff. Jullie said this had been discussed at length in Staff meetings and there was a very strong consensus of all depart- ment heads that Staff should remain together as a unit . He said he thought a situation with separated Staff would put an extra work load on an already heavily- burdened Staff . He said , however, that Staff is ready to follow whatever policy the Council sets out and will perform no matter what the situation is . s Peterson asked if the figures in Alternate III reflect the offsetting income from leasing the present facility . 10 Jullie said they did not and that the amount of offset would depend on who would lease the current building. He said , if the entire building were to be leased to the School District , we would eliminate the operating costs in addition to receiving $4 per square foot . He said , however, that he thought we might end up using a portion of the building for some of the community services outlined in Director of Community Services Lambert ' s memo of September 4th . Peterson said he would like to get a close approxi- mation of the income we might derive from leasing City Hall . Jullie replied that he thought we could get $20,000 in income and could cut our maintenance costs at the present City Hall by half. Rednotl^� nn l 1 -A .emu. r........ ...�.iuu Lt1C t`t4C.`s' t,lUn. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously . C . Report of City Attorney City Attorney Pauly reported on the opinion received from the Attorney General which concluded that the State statute that provides for the filing of campaign reports including campaign contributions and expenditures does not apply to cities having a population of less than 20,000 at the time of the dicennial census. He noted that enforcement of those statutes is in the County Attorney' s office . Pauly said the Attorney General 's opinion also concluded that the City would have the authority to regulate and City Council Minutes -18- September 16 , 1986 impose restrictions on campaign contributions and expendi- tures, subject to constitutional restraints, and that the City could require more frequent and detailed finance dis- closure reports than those imposed by the State statutes . S Bentley noted that we have the coming election, the 1988 election and the 1990 election before the 1990 census is certified and the campaign spending laws come into effect . He said that it would probably not be wise , or even possible , at this point to write new ordinances effective for the cur- rent period but that this is an issue we should probably s look at after the first of the year when the new Council is sworn in. He suggested that Staff remember this topic and bring it up for discussion and possible action sometime shortly after the first of the year. Peterson said he would like to get the consensus of the Council regarding the existing resolution that provides for all campaign contributions to be listed by amount and donor ten days prior to the election and that no contributions are to be received for a period of ten days prior to and ten days after an election. He said he felt this was im- possible to enforce , and, therefore, ineffective . Redpath explained the history behind the existing resolu- tion. Pauly noted that, according to the Attorney General , 1 the City could adopt an ordinance that would limit contribu- tions, but not expenditures . Pidcock said she thought the current resolution was stupid . Peterson then asked if the consensus was that we set the resolution aside or that we retain portions of it . Bentley said he thought the resolution is not a binding one and that it is a function of each individual to look at that resolution and decide what he will do about it : however, he did not think it would be a good idea to just arbitrarily remove the entire resolution. Peterson said he thought the resolution, as it stands, leaves candidates open to unfair criticism if they choose to not reveal their campaign con- tributions . Pidcock said she thought it wasn' t wise to clutter the books with resolutions that are unenforceable or that don't make sense . MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Redpath, to rescind Resolution No . 79-135. Motion carried with Bentley opposed. Bentley said he voted against the motion because he thought the intent of the resolution is that campaign contributions ` City Council Minutes -19- September 16 , 1986 be brought forward and , if those contributions are made public , whether within the stipulated time frame of ten days or not , the spirit of the resolution is adhered to. . Pidcock said that we could have something on the books that had the spirit of disclosure and that had a few more teeth in it than the previous one . She said perhaps Mr . Pauly could suggest something that would carry the spirit of dis- closure . Redpath said he thought we should come up with something better before we are forced to because of the population increase . Pauly also noted that he had learned in the last few days that Woodlake Sanitary Services has withdrawn its applica- tion to the E .Q.B . for a variance from the permit require- ments for expansion. He said this appears to put us back to square one . D . Report of Director of Public Works 1 . Award Contract for Bluffs East 4th T.0 . 2-0 6 (Reso- ution No . 6-2 Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the bids re- ceived for improvements in the Bluffs East 4th Addition and noted the recommendation to award the contract to Kenko , Inc . , as the lowest bidder . MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No . 86-251 , accepting the bid of $879,514.04 from Kenko, Inc . as the lowest responsible bidder for I .C . ,52-096, Bluffs East 4th Addition, Franlo Road & Utility extensions . Motion carried unanimously. XI . NEW BUSINESS There was none . X I I. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 11 : 15 PM. I I