HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 04/15/1986 ' A PPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 15 , 1986 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS : Mayor Gary Peterson. Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and
Paul Redpath
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J . J ullie , Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D . Frane , Planning Director Chris
Enger, Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert , Director of Public Works
Eugene A . Dietz, and Recording Secretary s
Jan Nelson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I . APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: VIII . A . 1 . t
Update on proposed Housing Code ; VIII . A . 2 . Formation of a
7
committee to recommend future uses for the existing City Hall ;
VIII . B . 3 . Request from Landscape Products Center for pre-
liminary grading approval .
MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Redpath, to approve the
Agenda and Other Items of Business as published -and amended .
Motion carried unanimously.
II . MINUTES
A . Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday,, January 21 1286
MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Pidcock, to approve
the Minutes of the regular City Council Meeting held
Tuesday , January 21 , 1986, as published . Motion carried
unanimously.
B . RegLilar City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 1 186
The following changes were made to the minutes : page 8,
paragraph 5 , sentence 1--change "guideline" to "a Guide
Plan" ; and sentence 2--change "a transition area" to
"adequate transition. "
k:
City Council Minutes -2- April 15 , 1986
MOTION : Anderson moved , seconded by Bentley, to approve
the Minutes of the regular City Council Meeting held
Tuesday, April 1 , 1986 , as amended and published . Motion
carried with Pidcock abstaining.
C . Special City Council Meeting held Friday, April. 4, 1986
The following changes were made to the minutes : page 2 .
sentence 1 --change "personnel employee" to "Human Resources
Director . "
a
MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Bentley, to approve
a
the Minutes of the special City Council Meeting held r
Friday. April 4, 1986 . as amended and published . Motion
carried with Pidcock abstaining.
III . CONSENT CALENDAR
s..
A . Clerk ' s License List
F
B . 2nd Reading of Riley Lake Surface Water ("`Ordinance No . f
-
F
C . RED ROCK HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION, by Jerry Halmrast and
Bill Gilk . 2nd Reading of Ordinance #7-86 , Zoning District
Change from Rural -to RI-13 .5 ; Approval of Developer's
Agreement for Red Rock Heights 3rd Addition; and Adoption
of Resolution #86-67, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance
#7-86 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary . 14 acres
into 7 lots and 3 outlots . Locations Southeast quadrant
of Village Woods Drive and View Lane . (Ordinance #7-86,
Rezoning; Resolution #86-67, Authorizing Summary and Pub-
lication)
D . PROCLAMATION REGARDING VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK IN
EDEN PRAIRIE
E . FINAL PLAT , THE FARM Location: North side of Duck Lake s
T a 1. west of 1?5th Avenue (Resolution No . 86-71 )
I
F. FINAL PLAT, AUTUMN WOODS 4TH Location: Adjacent to Dell
Road , north of Railroad Tracks (Resolution No . 86-72 )
G. Receive petition for utility and street improvements for
Bluff Country P'JD (Resolution No . -75
MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Redpath, to adopt
items A-G on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unani-
mously.
City Council Minutes -3- April 15, 1986
�l
IV . PUBLIC HEARINGS
A . DONNAY'S ROUND LAKE ESTATES by LAD Properties , Inc .
Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment
from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
on 14 .71 acres and Planned Unit Development District Re-
view on 34.92 acres , Zoning District Change from Rural to
R1 -13 .5 on 9 .58 acres and From Rural to RM-6 .5 , with
variances , on 14 .71 acres ,and Preliminary Plat of 34.92
acres into 69 lots and one outlot . Location: North of
Highway #5 , south of Lorence Way and west of Atherton
Way. (Resolution #86-48. PUD Concept Amendment: Ordi--
na.nce #12-86 , PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution #86-49,
Preliminary Plat ) Continued From March 25 , 1986
City Manager Jullie noted this request was continued
from the March 25th meeting of the City Council .
Mr. Mike Gair of Gair and Associates, representing the
proponents , addressed the proposal .
Planning Director Enger noted that this project was first
reviewed by the Planning Commission at its January 27th
meeting at which time it was continued to the February 24th
meeting to allow time for revision to address concerns
raised by the Commission and. Staff. He noted that the
question of density transfer off the central lowlands
area was of particular concern to the Planning Commission.
Enger stated that, at its February 24th meeting, the
Planning Commission on a 6-0 vote recommended approval
of the Guide Plan change from low density residential to
medium density residential and, •on'"a 4-2 vote , recommended
approval of the rezoning requests and preliminary plat ,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports of
January 24 and February 21 , 1986 .
Enger also noted that the Park, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission also reviewed the project and were
particularly concerned with the preservation of the pond
area. The Commission suggested that the road be moved to
accommodate the pond area. Enger said that the proponent
then further revised the plan -to completely save the pond
area, as shown on the most recent drawing of the proposal .
Redpath asked about the status of the Chain-of-Lakes y
drainage study. Director of Public Works Dietz responded
l I'
y
41
City Council Minutes -4- April 15 . 1986
that the Watershed District has completed the study and
a report is due soon that will specify the proposed solu-
tion for interconnecting the lakes and will include a
cost estimate for the project .
Redpath asked about the status of the decision on com-
pleting Dell Road . Dietz responded that , while Chanhassen
has a funding mechanism, the potential impact of the Hwy 5
realignment may result in a proposal this summer for an
interim measure dealing with the Dell Road/Hwy 5 matter.
Bentley asked about the area to the west of the project
being zoned I-General . Enger replied that some of the
area to the west will be developed as some type of multi-
residential . Bentley then asked about the need for addi-
tional screening or berming to the west of the project for
the benefit of the residents and if it would be appropriate
to take action to initiate rezoning from I-General to
rural for the area to the west .
Bentley asked about the existence of an outlet for the
pond and if it was adequate for overflow conditions .
Bentley asked Mr. Gair about the purchase of the lowland
area . A discussion of the density transfer question
followed Bentley noted that he felt density transfer was
a significant issue and that he would be much happier with F
density transfer than with a Guide Plan change . Peterson
noted that proponent is no longer requiring the density
transfer concept .
Anderson asked who had seen the revised plan so far since
it had just been redone . He emphasized the need to have
the plans available to the public for their. reaction.
Anderson asked about the existence of a tree inventory. s
Enger said there was one . Pidcock asked about the plans
for the trees . Mr . Gair pointed out the location of trees
to be saved on the plans and said that 590 of the trees
would be preserved . A discussion of tree preservation
followed .
Mr. Don Uden, 7530 Atherton Way, presented a petition
from area residents. (Attachment A ) Peterson asked if the
petition had been circulated prior to the current plan
revision. Mr. Uden said it had been circulated before
the latest revision. Mr. Uden showed slides of the area .
A photograph of the pond area was circulated among the
c ounc i lmembers . (Attachment B)
1.
City Council Minutes -5- April 15 . 1986
Mr . Chris Geason , 7470 Atherton Way, expressed his con-
cern about the hazards of increased traffic . He also }
noted that it would be necessary for residents of the
project to drive through a low density residential area
9'
to get to a medium density area .
Mr. Dick Thon, 7550 Atherton Way, expressed his concern
with the impact the project would have on the area ,
particularly the grading in the pond area . He noted the
potential of cracking the seal and causing the pond to
drain.
Mr. Rod Olsen, 7610 Heritage Road . distributed a list of
residents ' concerns regarding the project . a map and a
marked copy of Chapter 11 of the City Code . (Attachment C )
He stated the need for assurances to the property owners
adjoining the pond area as to what effect the changes to
the pond will have on their property. He also expressed
concern about the lack of planned amenities for the neigh-
borhood causing increased use of the Round Lake facilities .
Mr. Mike Derickson, 7491 Atherton Way, noted his concern
about changes in the pond and about traffic in the area,
particularly on Evener Way. He also noted his concern
about preserving the unique wildlife in the area .
Mr. Jim Brost , 17431 Evener Way, stated that his greatest
concern is with the density issue , that property owners
had purchased in the area with the assumption that the
area to the west would remain low density. He also ques-
tioned the impact of multi-family units on Eden Prairie' s
sewer allotments . Planning Director Enger said that the
agreement with the Metropolitan Council calls for the City
not to exct:tml a c;zrtain amount of sewer flow by the year
2000, based on population estimates . Enger said it could
be a problem if the population growth exceeds the estimates
for the year 2000 .
Ms Mary Bissen, 17613 Lorene Way, commented on her dis-
satisfaction with the proposed multi-family project .
Mr. Hal Yeager, 17609 Lorence Way, stated his concern
with one very large oak tree on his property that is
threatened by the proposed sewer routing.
Mr. Eugene Peterson, 7443 Hames Way, commented on the
potential problems with drainage into Round Lake from the
surrounding developments . He suggested that a storm sewer
City Council Minutes -6 April 15 , 1986
fee be charged to developers to avoid the cost of the
Chain-of-Lakes proposal being passed on to the taxpayers .
Mr . Rod Olsen stated his concern with the multi-unit
development trend creating a wide range of property
values in the area .
Pidcock asked about the adequacy of roads in the area
and if there were alternate ways to get into the project .
Director of Public Works Dietz commented that Evener Way
will probably be the primary traffic conduit in view of
its location and construction as a collector-type facility.
Pidcock asked about the impact of the pond area on existing
property. Dietz noted that he would not recommend moving
the pond closer to the existing homes on the east . Discus-
sign of disturbing the seal of the pond and extending the
pond area followed .
Dietz said it would be possible to determine the effects of
enlarging the pond as well as whether the seal would be
broken by excavation . Peterson said that any approval of
the project should be contingent on the determination of 3
the effects of enlarging the pond area. Anderson noted
his primary concern was that consideration be given to
area residents ` reactions to the extension of the pond .
He recommended that the project be returned to Staff for
more consideration of the density and pond development
issues .
Bentley noted that density transfer has never been used as
a subsidy for developers, but rather as a common devel'opagnt
*' tool for the City of Eden Prairie . He also stated his s
concern about the stability of the pond and the pond outlet ,
particularly in regard to the potential for flooding. He
then stated that he believed it is a very good project and
that it makes a good transition.
MOTION: Pidcock moved , seconded by Anderson, to continue
this item to the May 6th meeting of the City Council to
allow time for staff to review the questions regarding the
pond area and the question of densit-, transfer. Motion
carried unanimously.
Mr. Olsen asked that the area residents be ke pt informed
of developments in the project until the May 6th meeting.
Anderson noted that he believes it is important to have
staff investigate the best use of the major floodplain area
before any more decisions are made on it .
S W
vS�N,
z
City Council Minutes -7- April 15. 1986
B . THE RIDGE by Dirlam Development . Request for Planned '
Unit Development Amendment Review of 152 .4 acres,
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13 -5 on 8 .32
acres , and Preliminary Plat of 10 .42 acres into 17 single
family lots and one outlot . Location: Northwest of
Kilmer Avenue, west of Atherton Way . (Resolution #86-68,
PUD Concept Amendment; Ordinance #19-86, Rezoning from
Rural to R1 -13 .5 ; Resolution #86-69 , Preliminary Plat )
City Manager Jul-lie stated notice of this Public Hearing s
had been published and affected property owners had been {
notified . '
t
Mr . Vince Dirlam of Dirlam Development , the developers of j
the project , addressed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger said that this project was reviewed
by the Planning Commission at its March 24th meeting.
On 7-0 votes the Commission recommended approval of the
PUD amendment and the rezoning; from rural to R1 -13 .5 k
Zoning District Change as well as the Preliminary Plat .
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated
March 21st . Recommendations in the Staff Report included
revising the Preliminary Plat so that the entire project
could be rezoned to R1 -13 .5 and including trails along the
north and west .
Pidcock asked about the planned location of the trails
and what the street na-me would be . Anderson asked about
how the trails would fit into the existing trailway system- I
Enger pointed out the trail system on the plans .
Mr. Rod Olsen, 7610 Heritage Road , asked about plans for
both a sidewalk and a pathway system. Mr. Dirlam said it
would be path only. Mr . Olsen then expressed his concern
about the effect of construction traffic on the existing
streets . Enger mentioned that there is an existing drive-
way off Hwy 5 that might serve for construction traffic .
Director of Public Works Dietz noted that a bond probably
would be required for possible damage from construction
traffic because the neighborhood streets are posted for
four ton only.
Mr. Bob Wagner. 7450 Hames Way, suggested that the two
developers , Donnay and Dirlam, could share the expense of
building an access road for the construction traffic .
MOTION: Redpath ::owed . seconded by Pidcock, to close the
Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No . 86-68 approving
City Council Minutes -8- April 15 , 1986
Tits Ridge PUD Concept Amendment to the overall Crbscent
Ridge PUD . Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to give 1st
Reading to Ordinance No . 19-86 . Motion carried unani-
mously .
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt
Resolution No . 86-69, approving the Preliminary Plat of
The Ridge for Dirlam. Development . Motion carried unani-
mously .
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pideock, to direct
staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement as recommended
by the Planning Commission and staff and including the
recommendation regarding a driveway for construction
access . Motion carried unanimously.
C . CARDARELLE III AMENDMENT by Frank R . Cardarelle . Request
for Zoning District Change from Office to C-Regional-
Service on one acre for existing building. Location:
Northwest quadrant of Regional Center Road and Eden Road .
(Ordinance #8-86 , Rezoning) Continued from February 18,
March 4, and March 25 , 1986, meetings.
City Manager Jullie noted that this request was continued 1
from the March 25th meeting of the City Council .
Planning Director Enger noted that agreement had been m
reached between Mr. Cardarelle and Staff regarding terms
of the restrictive covenant suggested by the City Council
at its March 4th meeting. He said the terms of the cove-
nant would restrict a commercial use for no greater than
50% of the building and only on the first floor of the
building. He further noted that the restrictive covenant
is now in draft form but should be in final form by the
time of the 2nd Reading.
Mr. Frank Cardarelle was present to answer questions .
There were no comments from the audience .
MOTION; Redpath moved , seconded by Pidcock , to close the `
Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No .
8-86 for rezoning from Office to C-Regional-Service .
Motion carried with Bentley voting -no
MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Anderson, to require
that the restrictive covenant be executed prior to 2nd
;a
City Council Minutes -9- April 15 , 1986
Reading of Ordinance No . 8-86 . Motion carried with
Bentley voting "no" .
D . TOUCH OF CLASS INTERIORS by Kate and Craig Halverson.
Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low
Density Residential to Office, and Zoning District Change
from Rural to Office for an interior design studio .
Location: Southwest quadrant of County Roads #1 and #18 .
(Resolution #86-50, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment ;
Ordinance ##14-85 , Rezoning) Continued from March 25 , 1986
City Manager Jullie noted that this item had been con-
tinued from the March 25 , 1986, meeting of the City
Council .
Ms Kate Halverson and Mr. Fred Hoisington addressed the
proposal .
Planning Director Enger noted that the Planning Commission,
after considering the item at both their February 10 and
February 24, 1986 , meetings, recommended the denial of
the request for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from
Low Density Residential to Office . He also noted that the
Planning Commission was not convinced that the best future
use of the property would be as an office.
Enger called attention to the Staff Reports of February 7
and February 21 , 1986, that reviewed the proposal . He
also reviewed the use planned for the surrounding proper-
ties in Bloomington and Eden Prairie and the current
plans for upgrading County Road ,#18 .
Enger further noted that the Planning Commission was
sympathetic to the existing use of the property but
realized that issuing an Interim Use Permit for use as
an office would require an amendment to the City Code .
Bentley asked about the expected road alignments in the
area and possible commercial areas created in the front- y
age areas . A discussion of road alig.=ent and the develop-
went of neighborhood commercial areas Followed .
Pidcock questioned the possible pressures created on the
only office in a commercial area. Enger noted that the
pressures at the intersection would be primarily commer-
cial with service-type offices .
Peterson said that he felt there had to be compelling
reason in order to change the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
I
City Council Minutes -10- April 15 , 1986
He noted that the best use of the land may not be deter-
mined until the road alignment issue is resolved , thus
he felt that the concept of an interim use of the property
might be the best solution.
Bentley reiterated that an interim use permit would
require a Code change and commented that such a permit
might open a "Pandora's box . He asked why the Guide
Plan change had become such an issue in view of the very
small proportion of the total project requested as office
space . He mentioned past examples of multi-family areas
becoming mixed use areas.
Redpath expressed his concern for the Munsons if Che
interim use permit is approved .
Peterson asked w::at the potential acreage in the area
for office development would be . Enger said that the f
immediate area would be about 2 .5 acres or about 30 ,000
square feet , but he felt the potential for the surroun-
ding area was quite a bit more .
t
Redpath asked about the possibility of a letter of intent
( from the Halversons to show that they do not plan to
enlarge the existing office area . Ms Halverson said
that they would agree to that .
Enger noted that , after conferring with City Attorney
Pauly, there could be no vote by the Council on the
zoning issue because the Planning Commission had acted
only to deny the request to change the Comprehensive
Guide Plan and had not acted on the zoning request .
Bentley asked about the possibility of referring the
issue back to the Planning Commission for another review
of the Comprehensive Guide Plan change and the rezoning
issue and continuing the item to the next City Council
meeting.
MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Anderson, that the
issue be continued until the April 29th meeting of the
City Council to allow further review by the Planning
Commission and staff. Motion carried with Peterson voting
"note
E . OLYMPIC HILLS 7TH ADDITION by Olympic Hills Land Corpora-
t on. Request For Zoning District Change from Rural to
ti
City Council Minutes -il - April 15 , 1986
RI -13 .5 on 1 .05 acres for construction of three single
family homes . Location: 10602 , 10632, 10662 Mount Curve
Road . (Ordinance #13-86 , Rezoning) Continued from
March 25 , 1986
City Manager Jullie noted that this item had been con-
tinued from the March 25th meeting.
Mr. David Van House, attorney for the proponent , was
available to answer questions .
i
Planning Director Enger noted that the Planning Commission
had reviewed this item at its February 24, a986 , meeting.
He also noted the Staff Report on the project dated
February 21 . He stated that the Planning Commission had
recommended approval on a 6-0 vote . s
There were no comments from the audience .
MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Pidcock, to close
the public hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance
No . 13-86 for rezoning. Motion carried unanimously .
F. HOLAND ADDITION by David V . Holand . Request for Zoning
District Change from Rural to R1 -13 .5 on two acres and
Preliminary Plat of two acres into five single family
residential lots . Location: Southwest corner of Creek-
ridge Drive and Bennett Place . (Ordinance #20-86 , Re-
zoning from Rural to R1 -13 .5 ; Resolution #86-70, Prelimi-
nary Plat )
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing
had been published and affected property owners had been
notified .
Mr . Frank Cardarelle , representing the proponent , was
available to answer questions .
Planning Director Enger noted that this item had been
reviewed by the Planning Commission at its March 24, 1986,
meeting, at which time the Commission recommended approval
on a 6-0 vote . He also noted the Staff Report dated
March 21 that reviewed the project .
There were no comments from the audience .
MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Anderson, to close
the Public Hearing and give 1st Reading to Ordinance No.
20-86 for rezoning. Motion carried unanimously.
I
City Council Minutes -t 2- April 15 . 1986
MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Anderson, to adopt
Resolution No . 86-70 , approving the preliminary plat of
Holand Addition for David V . Holand . Motion carried unani-
mously .
MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Anderson, to direct
Staff to prepare a Developer' s Agreement as recommended
by the Planning Commission and Staff. Motion carried
unanimously.
G . CITY WEST BUSINESS CENTER 3RD ADDITION by Ryan Construc-
tion . Request for Planned Unit Development Amendment
Review on 15 .91 acres , Zoning District Change from I-2
Park to Office on 6 .3 acres for construction of a 69,500
square foot office building. Location North of Shady
Oak Road , west of City West Parkway.
City Manager J ullie noted that the proponent has requested
a continuance of one month to allow more time for evalua-
tion of the project .
MOTION Bentley moved , seconded by Anderson, to continue
the City West Business Center 3rd Addition item to the
May 20th meeting of the City Council . Motion carried
unanimously .
V . PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS 26450 - 26703
MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Pidc ock, to approve the
Payment of Claims Nos . 264.50 - 26703 Roll call vote :
Anderson. Bentley . Pidcock, Redpath and Peterson voted "aye" .
Motion carried unanimously .
VI . PETITIONS , REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A . Request by Wendell A . Phillippi for Flood Plain and
Shoreland Management Review for three bridges over
Purgatory Creek . Location: Riverview Road .
Planning Director Enger noted that this request had been
reviewed by the Planning Commission, the Park. Recreation
& Natural Resources Commission and the Watershed District .
He also noted the Staff memo of February 27 , 1986, and
the pictures of the three bridges in question that were
included in the Council material . He noted that the
Watershed District review had determined that the bridges
would not impact the floodplain capacity. Enger stated
that the Planning Commission had voted unanimously to
recommend approval of the bridges on condition that the
City not be responsible for potential damage to the
1
-y
City Council Minutes -13- April 15 , 1986
structures or for liability involving injury from the
s�ructures .
MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Bentley, to approve
the placement of the bridges subject to the condition
that the property owner agrees the City will be held
harmless with respect to any liability involving injury
from or to the structures . Motion carried unanimously .
B . High School Athletic Field Development
City Manager Jullie noted this item is a recommendation
from the Park, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
to approve the development plan of the athletic fields
on school property and to consider assisting the School
District with the project by contributing $50,000 to the
construction costs . The Commission further recommended
that the funds be taken from cash park fees .
Jullie noted the memorandum from Director. of Community
Services Lambert dated April 2 , 1986 , that reviewed the
proposed development and included a copy of a letter of
explanation dated March 26, 1986, sent to Round Lake Park
area residents .
Mr . Paul Fjare reviewed the proposed development .
Anderson asked why there was no gate in the proposed
fence to allow for retrieval of balls . Fjare replied
that it was to restrict parking along North Hillcrest
Court . Anderson suggested that "No Parking" signs could
be used to restrict parking.
John Pollock , II1, 16420 No Hillcrest Ct . , stated that
he was representing 27 neighbors in the area. He noted
his main concern was with the city usage of the fields ,
not the School District usage , in that he believed the
city usage would be more intensive than the school 's
would be . He also noted concern for the potential prob-
lems with lighted fields and "No Parking- signs restricting
the residents ' parking. He said that they would like some
kind of plan for use including a definition of hours and
the age groups expected to use the fields .
Anderson noted the long-standing policy to work jointly
with the School District to get maximum use of the ath-
letic fields and recreation facilities .
r
i
64
City Council Minutes -14- April 15 , 1986
Redpath asked if Mr . Pollock was aware of the athletic
field development when he purchased his home . Mr . Pollock
said he was aware the School District planned to develop
it .
p,
x
Mr . John Pollock, 16460 No. Hillcrest Ct. , noted his
concern about the proposed development causing noise
and traffic problems like those at Round Lake . He also
was concerned about the more intense use as a city facil-
ity and the potential use of alcoholic beverages on the
fields .
Anderson noted that the use of alcoholic beverages is
prohibited on school property. A discussion of the age 4
groups that would be using the facilities and control
of the use of alcoholic beverages on the facilities
followed . Anderson said that he believed the Council
should not put restrictions on the School ' s property.
Pidcock stated that she is opposed to building all ath-
letic fields rather than other recreation facilities .
Further discussion of the fence and gate question ensued .
Peterson requested that Mr. Fjare pursue the fence issue
with the School District .
X
MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Redpath , (1 ) to
approve the request to contribute $50, 000 from cash park
fees for the proposed development of the athletic fields ;
(2 ) that , in regard to the city activities (not the school
activities) on thee fields, the Couapil direct staff to
limit all adult usage to the southern fields and to limit
all use to the southern fields to the maximum extent
possible ; and (3 ) request staff to report back in one
year with the status of usage and problems with the fields .
Roll call vote : Anderson, Bentley, Redpath and Peterson
voted "aye" . Pideock voted "no" . Motion carried .
V1I . REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were none .
VIII . REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A . Reports of Council Members
1 . Update on Proposed Housing Code °
City Manager Jullie noted that this proposal had been
reviewed by the Human Rights & Services Commission
{
t;.
City Council Minutes -1 5- April 15, 1986
3
at their meeting Monday, April 14, 1986 . He said
that he expected the Commission to return a draft
of the Housing Code to the Council along with pro-
cedures for its use .
s
2 . Formation of a Committee to recommend future uses
or the existing City Hall
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, that
staff prepare and have published in the community
an invitation for nine persons to serve on a Facility
Committee to recommend possible future uses for the
existing City Hall . Motion carried unanimously.
B . Report of City Manager
1 . Concept approval on Refinancing Plan for Rogers by
SWSCC and Member Cites
City Manager Jullie reviewed the request by Rogers
Cablesystems for approval of a refinancing plan and
the schedule of proceedings by Southwest Suburban
Cable Commission and member cities .
MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Anderson, to
accept the recommendation on the schedule of pro-
ceedings and to schedule a Public Hearing on the
i5s ue i oi` Vlluy 6 , 1986 . Motion carried unanimously.
2 . Authorize expenditure of funrds for joint lobbying
of orts for MIDI (Metropolitan Development an
Investment Framework Continued from April 1 , 1986
Planning Director Enger noted that there should be
more information available at the April 29th meeting
after the revised draft of the nIF has been reviewed .
Peterson said he believed that our needs and concerns
are dissimilar to others in the southwest area com-
munities and that these differences will not be
perceived when we are part of a lobbying effort.
Bentley said he believed that we have some common
interests and needs with the southwest group but
that we may be better served in pursuing our own
independent lobbying efforts .
A discussion of the advantages of involvement in the
southwest group and the purpose of the group followed .
I
City Council Minutes -16- April 15 , 1986
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to
continue the issue to the April 29th meeting and to
direct staff to develop recommendations to which the it
Council can respond . Motion carried unanimously.
3 . Request from Landscape Products Center for Preliminary
Gradine: Request ,
City Manager Jullie noted the 2nd Reading on this
issue will not be snheduled until April 29th and so
they are requesting an early grading permit .
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve
the request from Landscape Products Center for prelimi-
nary grading with the understanding that they proceed
at their own risk should the 2nd Reading not be r
approved . Motion carried unanimously.
C . Report of City Attorney
City Attorney Pauly qu
estioned the effect on any continued
items of rescheduling the April 22nd meeting to April 29th .
Planning Director Enger said that only the Douglas Corp.
item had been continued to April 22nd and that item had
been republished .
a D . Report of Director of Public Works
1 . Award contract for 1986 Seal Coatin , I .C . 52-091
Resolution No . -73
Director of Public Works Dietz noted the memorandum
dated April 11 , 1986, to the Council summarizing the
bids .
MOTIONs Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt
Resolution No . 86-73 , accepting bid for 1986 seal
coating. Motion carried unanimously.
2 . Award contract for 1986 Water Meter Purchase , I.0 .
52-092 lResolution No . -7
Director of Public Works Dietz noted the memorandum
dated April 11 , 1986, to the Council summarizing the
bids .
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt
Resolution No . 86-74 accepting bid for water meters .
Motion carried unanimously .
City Council Minutes -17- April 15 , 1986
IX . NEW BUSINESS
There was none.
X . ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Pidcock , to adjourn the
meeting at 12:15 AM. Motion carried unanimously.
77
i
r
f
i
r
--