HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 09/04/1984 APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 7: 30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel , Richard Anderson, George
Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jul lie, Assistant to the City
Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly,
Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning Director
Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert
Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz,
and Recording Secretary Karen Michael
a
INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel
a
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: all members were present.,
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following item was moved from the regular Agenda to the Consent Calendar:
V_I_I . A. became III . G. CSAH 62 (Crosstown) Plan Approval.
�.. l
The following item was added to the Agenda: V I I I. A. Bentley - Request by
Mrs. McGowan. _
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Agenda and Other
Items of Business as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk' s License List
B. Approve and authorize submission of Joint Cooperation Agreement for parti ci-
pa�t-ion in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program
for Federal Fiscal years 1985, 1986, 1987 Resolution No. 84-226j—
C. 2nd Readinq of Ordinance No. 53-84, amending City Code Section 11.70, Subd.
3. A. &Subd. 5. E. regarding non-accessory signs , including violations and
fines, appeals & variances,_ especially with respect to campaign signs
D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 56-84, amending City Code Chapter 9, Section
9.40, Firearms Regulations
I
City Council Minutes -2- September 4, 1984
E. Final Plat, Rymarland Camp-Kurver's Addition (Resolution No. 84-238)
F. PRAIRIE KNOLL, by Hestia Homes, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 102-84-
PUD-8-84, zoning district change from Rural to R1-9.5, approval of Develop-
er's Agreement for Prairie Knoll , and adoption of Resolution No. 84-228,
approving Summary of Ordinance No. 102-84-PUD-8-84 and ordering the publi-
cation of said Summary of Prairie Knoll . 54 single family residential units
on 24 acres . Location: northwest quadrant of Valley View Road and Edenvale
Boulevard.
G. CSAH 62 (Crosstown) Plan Approval (Resolution No. 84-239) - moved to
the Consent Calendar - formerly was item VII . A.
City Manager Jullie noted that there were some concerns on the part of
the City regarding the berming for Carmel Addition. The County Engineering
Department had agreed to provide for screening and will look at this prior
to the actual awarding of bids which will be sometime in December.
City Attorney Pauly noted that a revised Section 9.40, Subd. 3. B. providing
for fees will be provided for in the Fees Resolution. (Re: II. D. )
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve items A - G on the
Consent Calendar as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
III . PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CITY CODE AMENDMENT to Section 11.70 to regulate signs at the Flying Cloud
Airport, 1st Reading. (Continued from 5/15/84)
City Manager Jullie noted this item was continued from the May 15, 1984,
meeting of the City Council .
Planning Director Enger stated this amendment had been reviewed by the
Planning Commission and the Commission had voted to recommend approval as
per the Planning. Staff memo of August 31, 1984, which was included in the
Council packet.
Bob Gartner, member of the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission and
Eden Prairie resident, reviewed the make-up of the Committee and addressed
the reasons for the amendment. He explained the two versions of the Ordinance,
Planning Director Enger indicated the Planning Commission had reviewed this
at its August 27 , 1984, Meeting and had recommended approval of the second
version.
City Council Mli nutes -3- September 4 , 1984
Gartner said the question of enforcement has been raised. He said the
businessmen at Flying Cloud would like to cooperate and don' t foresee
any problems with the businesses that are there now.
Bentley said he thought the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission
had done a good job and he felt that the Metropolitan Airports Commission
and the businessmen should also be thanked for their cooperation.
Enger said he would like to have time between the 1st and 2nd Readings
to look into enforcement procedures. He said these regulations would
apply to commercially licensed buildings which are controlled by MAC. r
MOTION: Bentley moved , seconded by Redpath , to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 114-84 (version 2) , regulating
signs at Flying Cloud Airport. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Fall 1984 Special Assessment Hearin (Resolution No. 84-219A) -
Tcont�nued from Bl28/&4- i
City Manager Jullie noted this item was continued from the August 28,
1984, Council Meeting. Jullie said Staff would recommend reducing the
w assessment for tree removal against the Carey property in half from
$485 to $242.50, adopt the assessments on the Hustad properties, and
continue the hearing on the Faulk 's tree assessment and the trunk sewer
and water assessment against Crescent Ridge. City Attorney Pauly reviewed
discussions with attorneys for the various parties which had taken place
since the last meeting. '
Director of Public Works Dietz stated he had met with attorneys for the
Hustads and they wish to keep their options open by leaving their appeals
as presented at the last meeting.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-219A and to continue action on the Crescent
Ridge assessment for trunk sewer and water and the Faulk's tree assessment
to the September 18, 1984, meeting of the City Council . Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Request for Multi-family Housing Bonds in the amount of $6,000 000.00 for
Eames Partnership Resolution No. 84-225)__'CContinued from 8/28/84
City Manager Jullie noted this item was continued from the August 28, 1984,
Council meeting.
David Ames addressed the proposal .
Bentley asked what the City' s standing is regarding low and moderate income
housing. Planning Director Enger stated the Metropolitan Council has indicated
the City should have 790 units by 1990. He said the City now has 61 housing
units for the elderly. He indicated the City' s goals will not be exceeded
with this project.
�1.
City Council Minutes -4- September 4 , 1984
Bentley asked if the location of the proposed project could justify this
r type of housing in regard to low income and handicapped -- is it near
1� shopping and transportation. Enger said this project is more for moderate
income residents.
}
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-225, adopting a program, and giving preliminary
approval to a development and its financing, under Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462C and authorizing submission of the program to the Minnesota
Housing Fi Finance Agency for review and approval . Motion carried with Bentley
�� �.
voting no.
D. Request for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of
$11 ,675,000.00 for Reynolds Printing Resolution No. 84-223 continued `
from 8%28/884T
City Manager Jul l i e indicated this request had been continued from the
August 28, 1984, meeting of the City Council .
Tony Feffer, Investment Services Group, Inc . , addressed the request.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-223, relating to the authorization and
issuance of revenue bonds of the City under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
474, for the purpose of financing a project thereunder; giving preliminary
approval and making an allocation with respect to the project and authorizing
an application by the City to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic
Development. Motion carried unanimously.
E. VALLEY LAKE BUSINESS CENTER, by GSB Investments. Request for Comprehensive
Guide Plan change frown Low Density Residential and Undesignated to Office/
Industrial ; zoning district change from Rural to I-2 for 4.4 acres for a
50,000 sq. ft, officejindustrial building (with variances) ; and preliminary
plat of 10.63 acres into one lot and one outlot. Location: east of Prairie
Center Drive , south of Valley View Road, along the northwest sivore of Smetana
Lake. (Resolution No. 84-235 - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendrnent from Low
Density Residential to Office; Ordinance No. 103-84 - rezoning; and Resolution
No. 84-236 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jul 1 i e said notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Gerald Portnoy, proponent, addressed the request.
City Council Minutes -5- September 4, 1984
Planning Director Enger stated this request had been reviewed by the
Planning Commission at its meeting on August 13, 1984, at which time it
voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included in
the Staff Report of August 10, 1984.
Director of Community Services Lambert stated the Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this proposal at its last meeting
at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the conditions in-
cluded in the August 10, 1984, Planning Staff Report and with the provision s
that a 20' wide trail easement be dedicated at the 840'contour connecting to
the City' s north-south trail and that a scenic easement be granted to the
south to Smetana Lake.
z
Bentley asked what would happen if the Council decided to zone this parcel
to office rather than to I-2 Park. City Attorney Pauly said the Hearing
had not been published for such a change. Bentley asked which would carry
more weight, zoning or a Guide Plan change. Pauly said the Guide Plan
change would because it essentially provides the development control .
A discussion ensued as to whether office or industrial would be the appro-
priate type of designation/zoning .
Anderson noted that Lee Data, Wilson Ridge, etc. all have trails. He
asked if the City had any plans showing these trails and their core lecti ons .
Lambert said there is a trails map which does show the trails in this area. 9
Bentley asked if the question of easements to the Kosteka property been
answered. Portnoy reviewed the problem and how it has been addressed. {
Gary Kosteka, 10805 Valley View Road, said he is concerned about selling
his easement as he would still like to be able to have access onto Valley
View Road. Enger said Staff had recommended joint driveways for these two
landowners. Kosteka indicated this met with his approval .
Pat Kosteka , 10805 Valley View Road, said she thought this was a nice
project.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-235, amending the Comprehensive Municipal
Plan_ Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to give 1st Reading to. Ordinance
No. 103-84, rezoning. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 84-236,
approving the preliminary plat of Valley Lake Business Center for GBS Invest-
ments . Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to direct Staff to prepare a
Developer's Agreement subject to the recommendations of Commissions and
City Council Minutes -6- September 4, 1984
Staff. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to direct Staff to prepare
preliminary guidelines for an office/service zone for review by the Planning
Commission and the City Council. . Motion carried unanimously.
Anderson said he felt it was time for the Council to meeting with the
Planning Commission to review the office/tech zone as well as the 9.5
zone. He said Staff should suggests possible dates for such a meeting.
F. LANDMARK WEST, by Landmark Northwest, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide
Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial ; Planned Unit Develop-
ment Concept Amendment; zoning district change from Rural to Neighborhood
Commercial (with variances) , and preliminary plat of 7.29 acres for service
uses (retail , 200-seat restaurant, health club, fast food restaurant,and
gas station/convenience store. ) Location: southeast corner of Shady Oak
Road and City West Parkway. (Resolution No. 84-229 - Comprehensive Guide
Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial ; Resolution No. 84-230
- Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment, of City West PUD; Ordinance No.
104-84 - rezoning; and Resolution No. 84-231 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jul lie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
John Uban, representing the proponent, addressed the proposal . Also
present was Paul Dahlberg, architect with Korunsky, Krank & Erickson.
Planning Director Enger indicated the Planning Commission had considered
this request at four different meetings. At its meeting on August 13, 1984,
the Commission voted to recommend approval of the requests subject to the
recommendations included in the June 8, 1984, and August 10, 1984, as
amended by the Commission-
Director of Community Services Lambert stated the Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this request at its second meeting
in August at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the recom-
mendations included in the Planning Staff reports.
Bentley said he felt this was a major change in the plan which had been
proposed as a concept. He said he felt the City Council should only take
action on the Guide Plan Amendment; it should defer action on the remaining
portion of the request until a later date. Redpath concurred and called
attention to a letter dated August 13, 1984, regarding rezoning of the City
West property which was received from the Uherkas. This letter noted that
this was a considerable change from what had first been proposed. Redpath
said he felt the properties west of Shady Oak Road should be given some
consideration as to overall use.
i
City Council Minutes -7- September 4, 1984
Tangen said he felt the Council should only discuss the Guide Plan Amendment.
Uban said the developer would like to begin construction as soon as possible.
He said they have worked through the process over a period of time and he
said they would like to have the City Council act on all the elements of the
request this evening.
Bentley noted that the City Council is the final determining body as to
Guide Plan changes. He said he was not unsympathetic with the time problem
but stated the Council has a responsibility to the residents of Eden Prairie
to do the best job it can.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to limit discussion to consideration 3.
of the Guide Plan Amendment change only this evening and to continue action on
the remainder of the request to a later date.
Redpath said he would like to have that sector of the City looked at again.
Penzel said he would concur; he would like to see this referred back to the E
Planning Commission for a sector review. Penzel said he would like to see
a review of the land uses as they were originally proposed by the Guide Plan
in this area. Bentley said he thought the plan seemed to be well conceived
but he felt there were extenuating circumstances which needed further review.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
Redpath said he was tired of having all these Guide Plan changes come
before the Council.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to refer this request back to
Staff for a Sector Study followed by review by the Planning Commission.
Tangen said he would vote "no" on the motion as there was no one in the
audience speaking for this. Jannn noted there is no neighborhood-type
commercial-service facility ts area of the City and something like
this is needed and necessary. He said he felt there was merit in this
proposal and that a Guide Plan change was warranted. He said he would like
to look at the other uses in the proposal in more detail , but would support
a Guide Plan change at this time.
Penzel asked Enger how long a sector study would take. Enger said it could
be done very quickly because Staff had developed material in this area
for the Carmel development and had material readily accessible for City West.
He said a study could be completed in time for presentation at the next
City Council Meeting.
Bentley said he was concerned about the relationship of this project and
how it was originally conceived.
City Council Minutes -8- September 4, 1984
Ken Biersdorf, representing the Uherkas, had a question regarding the
r Guide Plan and what effect the changes might have on the ultimate use
l of the Uherka `s property. Enger said he thought it would be looked at
from the standpoint of City West and the surrounding uses. He said he
thought the Uherka parcel would be designated an office-use parcel .
Enger stated that this would have to be looked at as to the impact -on ,
the area of additional office uses in regard to the traffic situation.
He said the use of that parcel could be office or office/commercial .
He said residential use would still be retained on the west side of the
road and that nothing would be done to adversely affect the residential
potential .
a
VOTE ON MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue acticn on this
Public Hearing to the September 18 , 1984, Meeting of the City Council .
Motion carried unanimously.
G. BLUFFS WEST 3RD ADDITION, by The Bluffs Company. Request for zoning
district change from Rural to R1-13.5 for approximately three acres and
preliminary plat of 14.3 acres into 20 single family lots. Location:
north of Burr Ridge Lane, south of Purgatory Creek. (Ordinance No.
105-84 - rezoning and Resolution No. 84-232 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Wally Hustad, Jr. , proponent, addressed the proposal .
Planning Director Enger stated this item had been reviewed by the Planning
Commission at its July 9, 1984, meeting at which time it was referred back
to the proponent for. revision. At its August• 13, 1984, meeting, the Commission
reviewed the revised plans and voted to recommend approval subject to the
recommendations included in the August 10, 1984, Staff Report as well as
those in the July 7, 1984, Staff Report.
Director of Conununity Services Lambert noted that the Parks , Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this at its August 6, 1984, Meeting
and had voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included
in the Planning Staff Reports. Lambert asked if the proponent was intending
to dedicate the outlot to the City or whether this was an easement. Hustad
said this would be dedicated to the City as a gift and would not be in lieu
of cash park fees.
Anderson asked if there was any public access to these outlots. Lambert
indicated there is access to one of them. He further explained how the
outlots would be connected.
Redpath asked how the City would control individually graded lots. Enger
said that is very difficult to control ; he reviewed some of the problems
which have occurred and means by which the City might have more control of
these situations. Anderson asked if these methods would be enforceable.
City Attorney Pauly assured him they would be since bonding would be included.
City Council Minutes -9- September 4, 1984
Bentley asked if the proposed drainage plans would meet the needs of the
development. Director of Public Works Dietz said it would.
Jerry Hegge, 10015 Pioneer Trail , said he was concerned about the traffic
patterns in the neighborhood. -He said nothing has been. done with the inter-
section of County Roads 1 and 18; no capacity has been added to these roads.
He stated that every 10-20-30 houses adds more and more cars. Dietz said
the City Council has approved an agreement with Hennepin County to help
defer the cost of signals at County Roads 1 and 18; he indicated he would
check further into the progress on that.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 1084-84. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No.
84-232, approving the preliminary plat of Bluffs West 3rd Addition, for
the Bluffs Company. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to prepare
a Summary Resolution of Approval per Commission and Staff recommendations
and including the dedication of the outlot to the City (as a gift by the
developer. ) Motion carried unanimously.
H. BLUFFS WEST 5TH ADDITION, by The Bluffs Company. Request for zoning
district change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 for 14. 5 acres, and preliminary
plat of 14.5 acres into 32 single family lots, Location: south of River-
view Road, east of West Riverview Drive. (Ordinance No. 106-84, zoning and
Resolution No. 84-215 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Wally Hustad, Jr. , addressed the request. Also present was Floyd Erick-
son, of RCM, who addressed the drainage problems.
Director of Planning Enger stated this request had been reviewed by the
Planning Commission at its meeting on July 9, 1984, August 13, 1984, and
August 27, 1984. At the August 27 th meeting, the Commission voted to
recommend approval subject to the Staff Report of August 24, 1984, with
the provision that no development of the area should be allowed until a
drainage plan has been considered.
Director of Public Works Dietz indicated there had been no attempt on the
part of The Bluffs Company to pay for all the improvements necessary to
improve the drainage. He stated there will be costs assessed to others
in the area for these improvements
_ _ t
City Council Minutes -10- September 4, 1984
Director of Community Services Lambert said this request had been
reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at
its meeting on August 6, 1984. It recommended approval subject to the
recommendations included in the Planning Staff Report and with the
addition of an 8' asphalt trail. on the south side of Riverview Road
to connect with the existing trail system.
z
Redpath asked about the temporary ponding of water and the cost of doing
that -- would it not be better to pay for a solution now rather than later.
Dietz said that, hopefully, by the 2nd Reading the City will come to a
final solution of this drainage problem; we will know the range of the
cost.
Brendan O'Donnell , 11590 Riverview, submitted a petition signed by 100X
of the residents requesting the City to not adopt this proposal . (The
petition is attached to these Minutes . )
Regis Betsch, 11941 Pendleton Court, said the buyers of the lots on the
north side of the street paid a premium for the lots because the lots
were zoned R1-22 and therefore would be facing homes on larger lots.
Gayle Diehl , 10530 West Riverview, said the Planning Commission had seen
an overlay in which there were 29 lots designated.
Dr. James Diehl , 10530 West Riverview, noted the importance of transition
in this area; there should be a variety of housing-types available in
Eden Prairie and this area could be one of large lots just as those to
the north. He noted the importance of having an area such as this available
to those who live in the area and wish to have larger homes in the same
neighborhood so as to maintain the same type of life style. He said it
was his feeling that the temporary ponds are just an attractive nuisance.
Diehl referred to two letters which were sent by him to the City Council .
(July 2, 1984, and August 13, 1984, which were included in the Council
packet. ) He said he did not wish to have to pay for sewer and water which
he did not want or need.
Charles Koshenina, 10541 Riverview Drive, stated he did not wish to have
to pay for streets, gutters, sewer and water which he did not need or
want. He said this would amount to a subsidy for this development and
the developer.
Hustad stated The Bluffs Company, did not intend to have the residents
pay for sewer and water unless they were hooking up to it; he said The
Bluffs Company would pay for the street improvements,
Redpath noted that when a resident's sewer system fails then that resident
is liable for the sewer access charge and not before that time.
City Council Minutes -11- September 4, 1984
Jullie stated The Bluffs Company is expecting to be reimbursed for any
resident who might hook up at a later date.
Bentley said he did not feel an adequate transition had been addressed.
Redpath said sewer and water costs keep rising; he noted that, in the past,
the Council and Staff have said that like or similar frontages should be
across from each other. He said he did not know what the transition would
be in this area. Bentley concurred and stated he had a problem with an
adequate transition. Tangen said he felt there were too many inconsistencies.
MOTION: Tangen moved , seconded by Bentley, to continue the Public Hearing
to October 2, 1984, and to instruct Staff to work out details such as the
drainage, the number of lots, and who will pay for the streets and utilities.
Motion carried unanimously.
I. BLUFFS EAST 3RD ADDITION, by The Bluffs Company. Request for zoning district
change from Rural to R1-13.5 for 9.63 acres , and preliminary plat of 9.63
acres for 29 single family lots. Location: west of Franlo Road, south of
Lee Drive. (Ordinance No. 107-84 - zoning and Resolution No. 84-234 -
preliminary plat)
City Manager Jul 1 ie said notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Wally Hustad, Jr. , representing the proponent, addressed the proposal .
Planning Director Enger indicated this request had been reviewed by the
Planning Commission at its meeting on August 13, 1984, at which time it
voted to recofrinend approval subject to the recommendations included in the
August 10, 1984, Staff Report. $
Director of Community Services Lambert said the Parks , Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission had reviewed this request at its meeting on August 6,.
1984, at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the recommenda-
tions included in the Planning Staff Report.
Jerry Hegge, 10015 Pioneer Trail , expressed concern about the grading plan,
Enger said the grading would be characterized by 20' cuts and 20' fills;
he indicated there were many areas in which grading of this type had been
done.
rt
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 107-84, Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 84-234,
approving the preliminary plat of Bluffs East 3rd Addition for The Bluffs
Company. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -12- September 4, 1984
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to prepare
a Summary Resolution of Approval as per Commission and Staff recommendations
and with consideration being given to minimizing the grading in the area . r
Motion carried unanimously.
t
J. FEASIBILITY REPORT for Eden Road and Singletree Lane, I.C. 52-011.
Resolution No. 84-240)
City Manager Jul l i e reported that notice of this Public Hearing was published
i
and property owners listed on the preliminary assessment rolls for this project
had been notified.
Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the details of the proposed
improvements and estimated assessment costs.
Penzel asked how assessments of this type on single family homes were
handled. Dietz said the payments were deferred until the homes were sold
and/or the property was developed.
Bentley asked if there was money available at this time for the construction
of four lanes of Singletree Lane. Jull ie said there might be some money
available via the capital improvements program. He said it would be
best to construct that now to contain the costs.
Claire Kooiman, 7936 Eden Road, said she objected to the segment between
Eden: Road and Singletree lake which is presently a dirt road. Penzel said
he could sympathize with Kooiman but it was his feeling that that whole
portion of the City would be developing sooner rather than later.
Tangen asked if there was any differentiation in the manner in which
commercial properties were assessed as opposed to single family homes.
Dietz said there were no proposed differences in the rates assessed.
He noted that the area is considered "land in transition" and the roads
have been designed with that in mind. Tangen asked if the City, by virtue
of this project, is forcing people out and said he was bothered by this.
Bentley said variations in the deferral process might be considered and
looked into. He suggested that the Council look into placing a "cap" on
the amount of interest on special assessments. Anderson asked if that
would put the City in a difficult position. Jullie said if there were a
large number of parcels involved it might,
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue the meeting beyond the 11:30
p.m. deadline to 12:30 a.m. Motion carried unanimously.
_.. -
_ ;,
City Council Minutes -13- September 4, 1984
Dietz called attention to a letter dated August 28, 1984, from Bruce C.
Bermel and John K. Teman.
MOT ION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath , to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-240, ordering improvements and preparation
of plans and specifications for I .C. 52-011 , Eden Road and Si ngl etree Lane
streets and utilities including a 42" pipe and Singletree Lane to be
constructed as four lanes. Motion carried unanimously.
K. TREANOR ADDITION ty Guy J . Treanor, Request for preliminary plat of 0.734
acres into two lots for residential development. Location: 16135 Valley
View Road. (Resolution No. 84-214 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie indicated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and property owners within the project vicinity had been
notified.
Guy Treanor, proponent, addressed the request.
Mary Lahti , owner of property to the west, speculated that this division
of property would lessen the value of his property.
i
Planning Director EngEr noted the Planning Commission had voted to recommend
approval of the preliminary plat.
MOTION: Redpath moved , seconded by Tangen , to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-214, approving the preliminary plat of
Guy Treanor. Motion carried unanimously.
L. T,E, F_R.A. HEARING on the Thomas Hotel IDR Project in the amount of $9,170,000.00
(Resolution No. 84-237)
City Manager Jul 1 i e stated noti ce of thi s Publ i c Heari ng had been publ i shed.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-237, extending public approval previously
given to a project under the Municipal Industrial Development Act. Motion
carried unanimously.
IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS . 15718 - 15829
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Payment of Claims
Nos. 15718 - 15829. Roll call voter Anderson , Bentley, Redpath, Tangen and
Penzel voted "aye. Motion carried unanimously.
V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were no reports .
J
City Council Minutes -14- September 4, 1984
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Woodpile Ordinance
Director of Community Services Lambert called attention to his memorandum
of August 29, 1984, in which this issue was addressed. He said the Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this at its meeting
on July 10, 1984, and again on August 6, 1984. It was the recommendation
of the Commission that there be no ordinance regulating woodpiles.
Anderson said he was aware of Bloomington's ordinance regulating construc-
tion equipment, trailer homes and woodpiles . He said he felt this would
become more of a problem as Eden Prairie gets bigger. He said he would
like a definition of what constitutes a nuisance.
i
Jack Van Remortel , 16031 Summit Drive, said there are rules and regulations
in place now which can take care of the problem; these should be made known_
Penzel asked if there was any provision in the zoning ordinance which would
prohibit storage in the front yard. Planning Director Enger said accessory
structures are not allowed in the front yard.
Bob Mavis , 6620 Lochanburn Road, said he was concerned about the elm wood
stacked on City right-of-way in his neighborhood. He said he felt the City
is asking for a long-term problem.
Bentley said he felt the issue is not one of woodpiles but one of clutter
and attractive nuisances. He said he felt there should be some controls
on not having piles neatly stacked and not having the piles fronting on
streets.
Penzel suggested the City Attorney be directed to bring a definition of
an attractive nuisance back to the Council .
Claude Johnson, 8741 Meadowvale, said he supported the recommendation of
the Parks , Recreation '& Natural Resources Commission. He said he felt
there would be more problems created if there were regulations as to what
people can and cannot do.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to not pursue a woodpile ordinance
and to request City Attorney Pauly review the present Ordinances of the City
as to what can be done to eliminate nuisances and/or to recommend what might
be needed in this area. Motion carried unanimously.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. CSAH 62 (Crosstown) Plan Approval (Resolution No. 84-239)
This item was moved to the Consent Calendar as item III. G.
City Council Minutes -15- September 4, 19a4
VIII . REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
Bentley - Request by Mrs. McGowan - Director of Public Works Dietz
explained the situation in the Amsden Way area in which Mrs. McGowan
lives. McGowan had expressed her displeasure with what has and has not
been done by the City relative to a drainage/run-off problem. Dietz
said the City had intended to put in a catch basin at the rear lot lines
but that was not possible. The City is now in the process of correcting
the drainage problem and McGowan wants to have the backyards put in an
acceptable state. Dietz explained the problems the City was experiencing
in getting easements from the property owners (McGowans and Richs) and
indicated what was being done under the circumstances under which the
City crews had to operate. The consensus was that Staff had done the
best that it could under the circumstances.
Redpath suggested Staff be instructed to start the rezoning process for
Richard Miller as outlined in Planning Director Enger's memorandum.
a
B. Report of City Manager
There was discussion as to possible dates to hold a budget hearing.
City Pianager Jullie will see if the School Boardroom is available for
such a hearing on Tuesday, September 25, 1984, at 7: 30 p.m.
City Manager Jullie indicated Dick Putnam, Tandem Corporation, had
requested in a letter to have the request regarding Muirfield on the
September 18, 1984, Council Agenda. The consensus was that this had
been continued to a "date certain" by the Council and would have to
be acted upon at that time.
C. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Master Plan and Recommendation
Director of Community Services Lambert noted his memorandum of August
17, 1984, in which the request to authorize approaching the Riley-
Purgatory Creek Watershed District with a proposal to determine the
cost of a study of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Drainage Plan
was outlined.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Staff
recommendation outlined in Director of Community Services Lambert' s
memorandum of August 17, 1984. Motion carried unanimously.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
There was none.
X. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 12 :40 a.m.
Motion carried unanimously.