HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 08/24/1999 - Workshop APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1999 5:00 P.M. CITY CENTER
Training Room,
8080 Mitchell Road
CITY COUNCIL:
Mayor Jean Harris; Councilmembers Sherry Butcher-Younghans,Ronald Case,Ross
Thorfinnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra-Lukens
CITY STAFF:
City Manager Chris Enger,Financial Services Director Don Uram,Public Safety Services
Director Jim Clark,Parks &Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert,Public Works Services
Director Eugene Dietz,Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert,Director of Inspections
Kevin Schmieg,Director of Assessing Steve Sinell,Finance Operations Manager Sue Kotchevar,
and Council Recorder Carol Pelzel
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER—MAYOR JEAN HARRIS
Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
H. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Case moved,Thorfinnson seconded,to approve the Agenda as published.
Motion carried 5-0.
III. HIGHWAY 101 COMUNICATION AND CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROCESS
City Manager Enger explained this group has previously discussed the process for design
review approval of Road Projects and ways to improve this process. Enger indicated
Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz is present to review this Workplan and to
discuss what will be involved in the process for Highway 101 improvements.
Dietz briefly reviewed the Strategic Workplan and the Strategy Assessment establishing
the process for approving road projects in the Community. Staff will be using Highway
101 as a working model.Dietz reviewed the changes made to the Workplan. The plan
does include a formal presentation that will include a question and answer session. Dietz
explained the biggest change to this Workplan is that the Mayor will be the moderator for
the public meetings and informal neighborhood meetings will be held. Dietz further
explained a newsletter was prepared by the County for the Highway 101 reconstruction
and mailed in July to property owners within 800 feet of each side of the roadway.
Dietz reviewed the approval process for Highway 101 explaining they do have more lead
time with this project. They are anticipating construction in the fall of 2001 or spring of
2002. An open house will be held which will include a formal presentation with a time
for questions and answers.Dietz stated they will present alternates but will focus on
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
August 24, 1999
Page 2
realistic options. Staff will structure a partnership with the potential for a final design task
force. Dietz reviewed the communication strategy that will include team involvement,
newsletters, Web site and the Eden Prairie News. Staff will also keep a chronicle of the
process as this is a long process and will include different people at different times. They
will need to remind the people of what has already taken place over the three-year period.
Dietz explained that a meeting of the staff design team would be held on September 2 to
finalize the agenda for the public open house scheduled for September 28. It will also be
necessary to review the process with the Mayors of Chanhassen and Eden Prairie to
determine what their role will be at the public meeting. The formal presentation will
involve a panel discussion for the question and answer part.
Tyra-Lukens pointed out that one of the challenging issues of this project is the
involvement of two different cities and the County. She asked what happens if one city is
in favor of a particular plan and the other city is not.Dietz responded that it would
probably take time to solve the conflict. It is staff s hope everyone will recognize there
are both fiscal and public transportation responsibilities to complete this project.
In response to Butcher-Younghans questions regarding funding for this project,Dietz
explained they would be using the turn-back process with the State. The road will have to
be built to State Aid standards at the expense of MNDOT. Trails on both sides of the road
will have to be done at the expense of the City along with any street lighting.Most of the
financing for this project will come from MNDOT. The project cost estimate is$8
million to $9 million with 80%of the funds coming from the State through the turn-back
process.
Thorfmnson pointed out one of the lessons they learned from the Pioneer Trail project is
that you cannot have engineers describing the proposed plans to the citizens. Thorfinnson
asked if this has been addressed in this new process. Dietz responded at one point they
did discuss this but have not built anything into this plan. They have discussed the role of
the moderator being somewhat influential and they are considering having the Mayors be
the moderators at the public meetings.
Mayor Harris asked at what point would the Council be involved in this process and in
what capacity. Enger explained that this process for the Highway 101 improvement gets
them to the first meeting with the neighborhoods most affected by this construction. One
of the reasons this item is being brought to the Council this evening is because ultimately
the entire Council will be involved. They have discussed the dynamics of these meetings
and how they will deal with the residents' answers and concerns. This road construction
is part of an overall transportation system and they need to interact and communicate
with the citizens on all road projects. All of the road projects ultimately require Council
approval. Enger said this project may go on for three or four years and this will require
keeping up to speed as to what is happening with this project and what has happened.
Enger asked how the Council would like staff to provide information to them and what
type of involvement they would like. Enger pointed out that they do have the framework
for this process and would appreciate the Council's comments.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP NIINUTES
August 24, 1999
Page 3
Thorfinnson pointed out he does not want to lose site of the fact that the engineers have
difficulty in communicating with the residents. Enger said he believes they have to first
deal with the concerns, fears and uncertainties of the people before they will be ready to
process the facts. Thorfmnson said he feels they can resolve some of the concerns with
open meetings and questions and answers. However,they need to formalize these
meetings and have minutes prepared so the information can be delivered to the Council.
This would help address any concerns there may be about the Council receiving the
information.Dietz responded that the preparation of minutes is included in the strategy.
Dietz reported while considering County Road 1 the staff and County did not put the
facts on the table at the beginning and were in a responding mode dealing with
misinformation. It is necessary they have a strong meeting at the beginning and get the
facts out in the open. Dietz said he is not sure how they can resolve the communication
problem between the engineers and residents.
Tyra-Lukens suggested they ask the residents what their concerns are before they present
them the plans for the road improvement and once staff is aware of their concerns they
can evaluate the plans on the basis of those concerns.Dietz explained they do have
several alternative plans and they will present a matrix that will show the pros and cons
of each alternative.
Case pointed out at previous meetings, it appears the residents feel it is already a done
deal. It is government's responsibility to work with and educate the residents. Part of this
project is a done deal in that they have decided that this roadwork is necessary.However,
other areas are still workable and the residents' input is required. The elected officials
have decided that this work is critical and it is important that the elected officials attend
different meetings to present the historical information that is necessary.
Following discussion,Mayor Hams asked that staff review this entire process and at a
future meeting discuss what the role of the Council will be over the next few years. Dietz
pointed out that the Mayor would be in attendance at each of the meetings serving as the
moderator. He suggested they consider appointing another Councilmember as a member
of a task force and report back to the full Council the progress of this project. Mayor
Harris asked that staff bring back several options at a future meeting for Council
consideration.
IV. YEARS 2000-2001 BUDGET WORKSHOP H
A. Presentation of Budget Information and Assumptions
City Manager Enger presented introductory comments regarding the budget
process. Staffs goal is to balance the budget but also keep taxes low. Enger
explained this is the first year Service Area Directors have developed a balanced
budget the first time through. Enger explained this is the first year they will be
initiating the multi-year budget process.
With regard to the multi-year budget,Enger explained in 1999 the Council would
adopt the 2000 budget and develop the 2001 budget. In 2000 the Council will
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP M MnS
August 24, 1999
Page 4
adopt the 2001 budget and then in 2001 they will adopt the 2002 budget and
develop the 2003 budget. This process allows staff to carry-over spending and
revenues into the next year. Also,much of the activity involved does not follow
the fiscal year. Therefore, it made sense to look at a couple of years for budgeting
purposes. The advantages of a two-year budget is additional time can be spent on
strategic planning in alternate years;there will be improved financial planning;
and a streamlined budget process which allows staff time to focus on other areas.
Enger reviewed the General Fund Budget objectives explaining that they will
begin the multi-year budget cycle, comply with levy limits, coordinate the budget
with the Strategic Plan,minimize tax impacts and ensure a balanced budget
model. They will also fund necessary services, continue funding capital
improvements and reduce the rate of increase in operational expenditures.
B. Discussion of Budget Scenarios
Financial Services Director Don Uram briefly reviewed the changes between the
2000 budget and 2001 budget on the revenue side.He explained that the total
revenues will increase by 5%in the year 2001. The budget will increase by 6%
from 1999 to 2000.Uram explained that licenses and permits increase 2.7% from
1999 to 2000 with the primary component of this revenue being building permits.
Uram explained that expenditures will increase 4%from 1999 to 2000. Staff
continues to try to increase the fund balance to reduce the levy at a future date. In
response to a question regarding the 2000 payroll adjustments,Uram explained
that staff has not yet allocated these funds. Wages are adjusted at the beginning of
each year and are allocated throughout the year.
Mayor Harris questioned the reduction of$35,000 under new employees from
2000 to 2001. Swaggert explained that that amount is expenses. In 2000 they are
projecting additional payroll for a certain number of new employees. That amount
will be incorporated into the 2001 budget. If positions are not added,the payroll
number becomes much smaller. Swaggert explained in the year 2000 they are
anticipating increasing staff at the front end and are seeing more activity in 2000
than 2001. There are new positions being proposed in the 2000 budget. This is a
result of a number of emerging issues. These positions will be needed because of
new technology and because of the continued growth in population.
Butcher-Younghans asked how Eden Prairie's wages compare with other cities in
the area. Swaggert responded that it is very difficult to do a comparison from one
city to another because of the different service levels. Eden Prairie has a liquor
enterprise and a different approach to the delivery of water and sewer. Swaggert
explained that the wage base will be different depending on the services offered.
However, economic adjustments and pay equity do balance out from city to city.
The same economic factors are used and each year an informal wage survey is
completed. Swaggert indicated for the year 2000 they are proposing a 4%
economic adjustment with 2%pay equity and a 3%step increase.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP NIINUTES
August 24, 1999
Page 5
Uram reviewed the various capital requests. He explained that median residential
property will see a 2.3%increase in taxes for the year 2000. The median home in
2000 is valued at$186,000 with the median home valued at$195,000 in 2001.
Uram further explained staff is projecting close to a$500,000 transfer from the
General Fund to the Capital Improvement Program to fund capital improvements.
Staff is attempting to increase fund balance levels to increase the City's bond
rating. The City's bond rating is currently AA3 and they are looking for an AA2
rating. One of the things that is looked at when reviewing a city's bond rating is
the city's fund balance. Eden Prairie's fund balance has increased$500,000 from
last year and they have approximately$4.6 million on reserve.Uram stated that a
study from the City's financial advisor indicated Eden Prairie has the lowest
unreserved fund balance. A majority of the cities have a fund balance of at least
50%while Eden Prairie is at 25%. The City does not issue a lot of debt,therefore,
the bond rating does not have such a large impact.However, Eden Prairie should
be rated the same as similar communities that have a bond rating of AA2.
Uram reviewed the budget model and indicated things look relatively good for the
City five years out.Economic growth continues with market values increasing
10%. This may change at any time and that is why staff has taken a conservative
approach. The model is based on information they have today and does not take
into consideration the issuance of debt for a new fire station. This cost will have
to be covered.
Dietz reviewed the Utility Fund Budget and explained their goal is to maintain the
$1 million fund balance. The actual fund balance at year-end in 1998 was
$1,588,000. Staff is not anticipating any rate increases in the year 2000 and will
look at those rates again in 2001. Thorfinnson asked that this be looked at very
seriously. He does not want to get into the situation of where they have to raise
rates 5% every year. Dietz said they would review the rates on an annual basis.
Dietz reported the operating revenues for the Utility Fund Budget will increase
4% from 2000 to 2001 and operating expenditures will increase 1%. Dietz
explained they have not been spending much for capital expenditures in the
Utility Fund. They have recently completed the Wetlands Plan and will be
developing a Water Management Plan. Once these reports are completed,they
will better know what funds will be expended.
Uram presented the Liquor Fund Budget objectives explaining that they have
hired an inventory control clerk. The City does have an inventory of$5 million
and they need to keep better control of this inventory. Uram indicated they would
be spending additional funds to improve store security. Any remaining monies in
this Fund will be transferred to the General Fund or to the Capital Improvement
Program. Last year excess funds were placed in the Debt Service Fund.
Case asked if there are any plans to have a liquor store located at the Hustad
Development on Highway 169 and Pioneer Trail.Uram responded that staff has
discussed this and feel it is an excellent site.However,they question whether or
not this commercial operation is big enough to support a liquor store. Staff will
continue to monitor this site.