HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 06/25/1996 - Workshop APPROVED AIRMIES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 259 1996 7:00 p.m. CITY CENTER
COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP Heritage Room IV, 8080 Mitchell Road
COUNCI MEMEBERS: Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Ronald
Case, Patricia Pidcock, Ross Thorfinnson,
and Nancy Tyra-Lukens
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant City
Manager Chris Enger, HRA Manager David
Lindahl, and Recording Secretary Barbara
Anderson
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting began at 7:15 p.m.
II. PRESENTATION OF LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACTION PLAN
Lindahl stated the Livable Communities Action Plan was essentially the strategies
approved by the City Council to meet the Livable Communities housing goals, and this
will be submitted to the Metropolitan Council with any changes or revisions proposed by
the Councilmembers. Public housing has been stressed because of lawsuits won by people
who felt they were discriminated against. In the future to qualify for tax credits a certain
amount of public housing must be built. The City is not equipped to own or manage
public housing at this time, but should consider having it within the community.
Minneapolis is willing to own these units if Eden Prairie will have it within their
community.
Discussion ensued regarding affordable housing versus low income housing. Minimum
income levels needed to buy affordable housing were discussed. Affordable is a term
applied to housing within a certain price range by the Metropolitan Council but it becomes
difficult to establish exactly what that means. Possibly avoiding labels would be a way
around this problem. Mayor Harris commented that keeping housing affordable once it
has been constructed is a challenge. Lindahl stated most developers are very interested in
talking about this type of housing and most communities are vying for it as well. Enger
said Eden Prairie is behind in this type of housing projects and he was concerned that Eden
Prairie cannot be successful because of the political pressure put upon Eden Prairie to
adopt this type of housing and build it. Pidcock stated people put pressure on
councilmembers to keep things the same and fight change in order to retain their
perception of how the City should remain.
Lindahl said there were ways to accomplish the construction of affordable housing in a
win/win type environment. He believed if they could make a few apartment units
affordable to low income persons, it would not be obvious to the public at large, and
would still accomplish the City's goal of creating affordable housing within Eden Prairie.
They could start a rent reduction program which would not be as threatening to residents
as a new building being constructed. The apartments could be retrofitted by financial
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION bIINUTES
June 25, 1996
Page 2
buying down with little or no fanfare. This could be done when apartments turn over, and
the turnover rate for apartments in Eden Prairie is between 8 and 10%. Lindahl said there
were a few sites left in Eden Prairie which would be good transition between single family
and other uses and also have good access to schools and services. Various sites where
habitat houses could be built were discussed. A proposal for the apple orchard property
was discussed and the results of the second neighborhood meeting were reviewed.
Housing on top of shopping centers or having more high density residential development
in the downtown area was discussed. This would facilitate the development of the
"walking community" concept and perhaps get it going. Enger commented there was a
developer who was interested in constructing luxury condominiums in the downtown area
which would put people living in this area. The transit hub should attract people to this
area as well. There has been talk about selling five acres on the transit hub site for
housing. There would be credit given to all three cities for the housing development if it
were built. They could possibly utilize TIF money to buy down the cost of the land, and
all three cities involved would receive credit for the housing units built even though it is
located within Eden Prairie. The other cities would receive recognition for doing the
construction partnership, and they have TIF money available. The low income portion of
the project would only be 20% or less because they don't want to put all the low income
housing on one site, but spread it throughout the community.
Lindahl commented the legislature had come close to passing a mandate requiring a certain
amount of low income housing but it did not pass. Discussion ensued regarding how the
issue of affordable housing should be handled with developers who proposed projects in
Eden Prairie which would allow Eden Prairie to attain its goals. Concern was expressed
that there is not that much developable land left in which to accomplish this goal of
affordable housing and this issue was not being pushed to reach the goal. Pidcock stated
the market is changing, and while there is a large demand in Eden Prairie at present for
single family residential, the population is changing and the need will be for smaller
houses and more consolidated types of properties. Many housing developers are building
condominiums rather than single family homes. This community offers residents the
opportunity to live here through all the cycles of their lives, and this should continue to
be balanced. Balancing the level of employment with the levels of housing was discussed,
and it was believed that achieving this goal would ultimately reduce traffic levels within
the City.
Lindahl stated the Livable Communities Action Plan would be placed on a Council agenda
in the near future, and Councilmembers could communicate any changes they wished to
make prior to that time.
Discussion ensued regarding the issue of the City of Minneapolis putting low income units
in outlying communities and the possibility of the legislature becoming involved in this.
Concern was expressed about having another municipality owning property within another
municipality and the potential problems which could arise from such a situation.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION NIINUTES
June 252 1996
Page 3
M. OTHER BUSINESS
None.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.