HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 04/17/2001 - Workshop APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP/FORUM
TUESDAY,APRIL 17, 2001 5:00-6:55 PM, CITY CENTER
HERITAGE ROOMS I&H
CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher,Ron Case, Jan Mosman,
Nancy Tyra-Lukens
CITY STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger,Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz,
Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram,Management Services Director
Natalie Swaggert,Public Safety Services Director, Jim Clark,Parks and Recreation Services Director
Bob Lambert, City Attorney Ric Rosow,Recorder Lorene McWaters
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER—MAYOR JEAN HARRIS
Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m.
H. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
III. CIP UPDATE
City Manager Chris Enger and Financial Services Director Don Uram reviewed the Capital
Improvements Plan(CIP)background and process. Best Financial Practices used in the plan
include:
■ A fund balance/working capital policy that maintains an adequate revenue stabilization
fund(which is made up of excess permitting fees that are set aside to covering future
operating expenses)
■ Multi-year financial forecasting that uses a balanced budget model
■ Quarterly financial reporting
■ Debt affordability reviews
■ A five-year CIP that integrates operating costs
A capital improvement is defined as a construction project or capital purchase that costs
more than$25,000 (set by the Council) and has a useful life of more than five years. Enger
described the Capital Improvement Plan as the systematic planning, scheduling, and
financing of capital projects. The City's current CIP was developed by staff based on values
and direction provided by the Council and went through several iterations with Council
input before approval. Enger indicated that capital improvement planning is typically not a
task delegated to an advisory group.
There are three types of capital improvements:
Maintenance—Reconstruction,rehabilitation or restoration of an existing system or facility
to full functionality.
Support—Expansion of an existing system or facility to meet increased demands.
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
April 17, 2001
Page 2
Expansion—Construction of a new system or expansion of an existing system to meet
increased demands or enhance services.
Capital projects are divided into three categories based on urgency of need. "A"projects are
those that must be completed; `B"projects are necessary,but timing is not critical; and"C"
projects are desirable if funding is available.
Staff have identified capital improvements through 2005 at$20,512,500, and have identified
an additional$4,791,000 in projects beyond 2005, for a total of$25,303,500.
Current funding sources include the CIP Revolving Fund, General Fund Tax Levy, one-time
revenues (sales of city-owned land), and the Park Improvement Fund. Potential funding
sources include the Liquor Enterprise Fund,bonding, City Center Debt Service Fund, a
Street Light Utility, and possible Street Utility(which would require passage of legislation
at the State level). Projects not currently on in the CIP that may require consideration
include:
■ GTA Projects ($6-12 M)
■ Unfunded Transportation Projects ($10 M)
■ Public Safety Training Facility($400,000)
■ Southwest Fire Station($2.5 M)
■ City Center Parking($1 M)
■ Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Entry($2-5 M)
■ Water Park/Community Center($4 M)
■ Parkland Acquisition($2 M)
■ Management Conservation Areas ($2 M)
■ Birch Island Woods/Picha($3 M)
■ Historic Sites Improvements ($1 M)
■ Golf Course($4-5 M)
■ Third Ice Rink($4 M)
Youth Athletic Fields ($1-4 M)
■ Golf Course($4-5 M)
Total$42.9—55.9 M
Uram noted that almost none of these projects were part of the original CIP "A"list.
Councilmember Butcher indicated it is important to differentiate between discretionary and
necessary projects. Councilmember Case said he would like to review the entire list again
and tweak it,if necessary. It was noted that some"A"priority items may not have to be
fully funded by the City. Some state funding may be available for Golden Triangle road
improvements, and public/private partnerships might help fund historic homes renovations.
Councilmember Tyra-Lukens asked if a project that received partial outside funding would
be bumped up the list in priority. Enger said that would depend on the timeliness of the
funding. Councilmember Mosman asked at what point the City would consider a bond
issue. Enger said that would depend on any possible school bond issues and other factors.
He said the Council has historically deferred to the school district when they have indicated
they need to do a bond issue.
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
April 17, 2001
Page 3
IV. COUNCIL FORUM
V. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m.