HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 10/09/2017 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, October 9, 2017 - 7:00 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION John Kirk, Charles Weber, Travis Wuttke, Ann Higgins,
MEMBERS: Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Mark Freiberg, Michael DeSanctis,
Christopher Villarreal
STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer;
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE --ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
III. MINUTES
A. Approval of the Minutes for the September 11, 2017 meeting
IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
V. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. VARIANCE #2017-02
Request to:
• Permit an accessory garage structure 10 feet from the east side lot line and 10 feet from
the rear south lot line. City Code requires a 30-foot accessory structure setback from the
side and rear lot line in the Rural Zoning District.
VII. PLANNERS' REPORT
VIII. MEMBERS' REPORTS
IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER
Council Chambers
8080 Mitchell Road
COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Travis Wuttke, Ann Higgins, Charles
Weber, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Mark Freiberg,
Michael DeSanctis, Christopher Villarreal
CITY STAFF: Julie Klima, City Planner
Rod Rue, City Engineer
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
Julie Krull, Recording Secretary
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE —ROLL CALL
Weber, Higgins, DeSanctis and Villarreal were absent.
IIII. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Farr, to approve the agenda. Motion carried 5-0.
IV. MINUTES
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY,AUGUST 14, 2017
Wuttke had a change on page 4,paragraph 5, second sentence. He would like it
to read, "He suggested setting that off to the side, further away from the walking
pathways."
Wuttke had a change on page 6,paragraph 2, first sentence. He would like it to
read, "Wuttke asked if the residents, as part of the Eden Prairie Comprehensive
Plan online mapping system, had commented on that intersection."
MOTION: Wuttke moved, seconded by Farr, to approve the minutes as
amended. Motion carried 5-0.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 11, 2017
Page 2
V. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO SELF STORAGE FACILITIES
Request to:
• Amend City Code, Chapter 11 relating to self-storage facilities
Klima said the current City Code does not provide a definition for self-storage
facility or list self-storage facility as a permitted use in any specific zoning district.
This lack of definition or specific zoning district for self-storage facility invites
ambiguity in determining the appropriate zoning district to locate the use. These
self-storage facilities have historically been permitted in the Industrial zoning
districts under the permitted use of warehouse. Currently there are three self-
storage facilities in the I-2 zoning district all developed prior to 2000. One self-
storage facility is located in the Commercial Regional Service (C-Reg-Ser) zoning
district. City Code does not define self-storage or specifically identify as a
permitted use where self-storage facilities may locate. Staff has conducted a
regional and local review of city codes related to self-storage facilities. The term
self-storage facility is the preferred terminology noted in city codes and in the self-
storage industry. The local and national research reveals self-storage facilities
generally occur in the industrial and/or commercial districts as determined by local
controls and the city dictates the degree of architectural and exterior building
material requirements.
Klima said this code amendment is proposed to define and list self-storage facility
as a permitted use in the Industrial I-Gen district in order to preserve commercial
properties for the highest and best commercial use. The I-2 and I-5 Industrial
Districts would be preserved for office and high tech uses. Staff recommends the
following self-storage facility definition: "Self-Storage Facility: -A building or
group of buildings designed and used for the leasing of compartmentalized
individual storage space to tenants who have controlled and secure access for the
sole purpose of storing personal property which is not held or offered for current or
future sale. If this amendment is approved, the existing four self-storage facilities
would become non-conforming, but would be able to remain and be maintained, but
not expand consistent with the non-conforming use language in City Code and State
Statute. The existing property owners of self-storage facilities have been notified
via US mail of the proposed code change. Staff recommendation is for approval of
the following: Amend Section 11.02 Definitions to include a definition for Self-
Storage Facility; Amend Section 11.30 Industrial District to include Self-Storage
Facility as a permitted use in the Industrial (I-Gen) district, as represented in the
Planning Commission Staff report dated September 6, 2017.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 11, 2017
Page 3
Wuttke asked how this code amendment would affect the existing storage facilities
since they are already there. Klima said nothing really changes; only they cannot
expand. Kirk asked if they could sell their facilities. Klima said they could sell
their facilities. Chair Pieper asked if they wanted to expand would they have to get
a waiver. Klima stated they would have to get a waiver.
Wuttke asked if homeowners could lease garage space to a person for storage.
Klima said this definition is to address the only activity for the building. It would
be for the overall primary use. Storage in a garage would not be considered as
such. Kirk commented he felt the definition should be expanded.
Wuttke asked if there is a timeline for approving this code amendment. Klima said
there was not a timeline for approving this amendment.
Wuttke said there are working farms in Eden Prairie and asked if they could use
some of their property for storage. Klima said there is not a lot of property to be
developed in Eden Prairie so they want to give permissiveness in the code for
guidance and best use. Wuttke asked when inquiries come in, what guidance has
been given. Klima said it would be typically a broker with a specific property in
mind so the Staff gives them detailed information to inquiries.
Wuttke commented there are enough buildings in Eden Prairie and asked if the City
is limiting itself by having this ordinance. Klima said this ordinance is for people
inquiring about storage units. If it was in the ordinance now there would be many
more expectations brought forward. Wuttke said it looks like there are only four
locations available in Eden Prairie and asked Klima to go over these areas. Klima
said there are four general areas zoning I-General; one of those is the MOSS site,
the other three are on the LRT bike trail, ending at Industrial Drive and Hwy 62.
There are 18 parcels in the area and if this would be adopted the inquires would be
directed towards this area. Wuttke asked if someone wanted it in the Golden
Triangle area, with the enactment of this code, would it be available. Klima said if
this was approved, the inquiry would be directed to where uses are permitted and
the Golden Triangle is not in that area. Wuttke asked if we are limiting ourselves
by this proposed ordinance for individuals that want to store vehicles off of the LRT
line. Klima state she cannot speak for mini-storage for vehicles, as to the need,but
there would not be storage available off of the LRT line.
Farr asked if this code contains outdoor storage. Klima said the I-2 and I-5 does not
allow outdoor storage. If the City was to get an inquiry about outdoor storage with
self-storage, it would need to be stored inside. I-Gen does allow for outdoor
storage. Farr asked what the process would be for an applicant that would like 75%
inside and 25% outside storage. Klima said that would be a new development and
would require the review and approval process.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 11, 2017
Page 4
Kirk said in regards to the language, he would like to see a few words added for
clarity. He commented there is an I-Gen location on Hwy 212 and Hwy 4 that
would be a good location for the City to give direction for the best use of property
for usage.
Farr said the user convenience is becoming more and more important. An example
would be if a woman would want to be going to a safe environment. Farr feels
there is a safety issue placing them in an area that is quiet and dark. Chair Pieper
asked if there are problems with the residents next to these units. Klima said there
are areas in the City that have industrial next to residential areas. This may not be
what the City would like to see but they have to look at what would be the best use
for the property. Freiberg said he likes the way Industrial is defined for this
purpose.
Wuttke asked if this proposal is enacted, would the City want storage units at the
MOSS site. Klima said currently there have been no inquiries for this area and she
does not see any for the future. Wuttke commented that the other three uses for this
site, one is by a church with an industrial area to the east. The other one is by
Venture Lane, which has power facilities so this would not be developed so that
would leave the one on Hwy 62, and asked if the City is creating a problem by
adopting the code amendment. Klima said occupancy of storage units tend to be a
fluid temporary situation. There is a market out there so staff is proposing this to
give direction to the inquires.
Kirk stated he did not feel Eden Prairie would be an ideal area for storage facilities
because of the expense. Farr said it was an important concept for the City. Kirk
also said safety and convenience are issues with the storage facilities. Wuttke
stated the blue areas on the map might have safety concerns. Wuttke pointed out
the one storage facility on the north end is by the asphalt plant and asked if the plant
has any intention of moving. Klima said she has not heard anything in regards to
them moving.
Farr stated these should be a conditional use with architectural standards. Kirk
asked what would happen if we did adopt this or if we do not adopt this. He asked
if an application is accepted in a commercial district what happens. Klima said
three of the four storage facilities are in the industrial districts with only one being
in a commercial area, so that would need more review.
Farr asked if there would be a benefit for apartment buildings or senior living
facilities to have to supply residential storage. Klima said she has never come
across an ordinance requiring a certain amount of storage at these facilities and
stated it could be a challenge to implement.
Kirk asked if we want this ordinance in our City and asked what other city's
positions are in regards to mini-storage and commented as a Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 11, 2017
Page 5
they have to articulate what the City wants. Farr said this is a desirable service for
the community and it should be controlled through architectural standards. Chair
Pieper asked if it should go in industrial zone and Farr said if need be but would
like it in commercial. Kirk said he is in the middle of the road on his decision
tonight. He sees it as a need for the community but it needs to be balanced. He
wants them to be in the right place and appropriately designed.
Wuttke asked if the Commission has come to a conclusion or consensus in regards
to the language. Kirk said, given the circumstances, he is not ready to make a
decision and would rather have the Commission think about it and make a decision
at a later time. Chair Pieper asked what the City could do to help with this. Wuttke
asked if Kirk wanted a continuance. Kirk stated he does want to continue this.
Freiberg said he concurs with Kirk but said there does need to be a balance,
especially when we start talking commercial. He stated he feels it should be kept in
the industrial district even though it is commercial. Farr said he supports Kirk's
suggestion for a continuance. He feels that the use may be appropriate in other
districts with higher architectural standards. Klima said the staff will need to go
back and do more research and look at what it might mean to broaden industrial
areas and be approximate to commercial areas and also come back with additional
information for the Commission. Chair Pieper said it would be nice to have all the
Commission members present for discussion and feels a continuance would be
appropriate.
Chair Pieper opened the meeting up for public input. There was no input.
MOTION: Farr recommended a continuance to the October 23rd meeting,
seconded by Freiberg, at which time City Staff could bring back information on
opportunities for other zoning districts, safety issues, and architectural standards.
Motion carried 5-0.
VIII. PLANNERS' REPORT
Klima reminded Commission Members to RSVP to Lori Creamer for the September 19th
work session.
Klima said the September 25th Planning Commission meeting is cancelled.
IX. MEMBERS' REPORT
Wuttke requested a moment of silence for all those individual that lost their lives and those
grieving for 9/11.
Farr said he attended the Watershed Tour that started out in Chanhassen and ended up in
Eden Prairie and said it was very informative.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 11, 2017
Page 6
X. CONTINUING BUSINESS
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Wuttke moved, seconded by Farr, to adjourn the Planning Commission
meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
Chair Pieper adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Steve Durham, Planner II
DATE: October 4, 2017
SUBJECT: Variance Request#2017-02
APPLICANT/ Craig A Diederichs
OWNER:
LOCATION: 9551 Riverview Road, Eden Prairie, MN
REQUEST: Variance to permit a detached garage structure 10' from the (east) side lot
line and 10' from the (south)rear lot line. City Code requires a 30'
accessory structure setback from the side and rear lot lines in the Rural
Zoning District.
BACKGROUND
The property is zoned Rural and consists of 1.24 acres.
A home was constructed on this site in 1958. A detached garage was added based on historical
aerials around 1965. According to Assessing records the garage contained 928 square feet. The
garage was removed over the summer of 2016 due to its dilapidated and unsafe condition. The
setbacks of the removed garage were 0' from the rear lot line and approximately 15' from the side
lot line.
The property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area(MUSA,) and guided low
density residential. The site is currently not served by City sanitary service.
VARIANCE REQUEST: The request is to construct a garage with a setback variance from the
side lot line and rear yard lot line. The Rural Zoning District requires a 30 foot side and rear yard
setback for detached accessory structures. Due to topography of the lot, location of existing
home, location of existing well, location of existing septic system and drain field, and location of
existing mature trees,positioning of a new garage to meet the required Rural 30' accessory
structure setback is not feasible. The applicant is proposing to construct the garage with a 10 foot
side and rear yard setback due to the constraints listed above. Rezoning the property to an RI
zoning district is not an option as sanitary sewer service is not immediately available to this
parcel.
VARIANCE STANDARD
Variances may be granted when they are"in harmony with the general purposes and intent of
the ordinance and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan."
Furthermore, variances may"be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there
are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used
in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the
property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; the plight of the
landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the
Staff Report—Variance #2017-02
October 4, 2017
Page 2
variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality."
Harmony with Purpose and Intent of Ordinance
The approval of the variance is in harmony with City Code requirements. The requested 10' side
and rear yard setback would be consistent with any future R1-9.5, R1-13.5, R1-22 and R1-44
district should the property ever be rezoned. The new garage will be the same size as the previous
garage. The proposed location of the new garage moves the setbacks closer to compliance with
required setbacks than the previous garage was. The previous garage essentially had a zero foot
setback from the rear property line.
The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan
The property's use as a single family residential property is consistent with the current Guide Plan
Designation of Low Density Residential.
Reasonable Use of the Property
A detached garage is reasonable use of the property.
Unique Circumstances
Unique circumstance, meaning the problem is due to circumstances unique to the property not
caused by the current land owner. The unique circumstance associated with this property include
the location of the existing well, septic system, home site, and mature trees. The property owner
did not create the unique circumstances.
Alteration of the essential character of the neighborhood characteristics
The proposed accessory structure will be in alignment with the neighborhood and an improved
condition to the previous garage setbacks.
STAFF RECOMENDATION
Recommend approval of the request subject based on staff report dated 10-4-17 and plan stamp
dated 09-15-17.
REQUESTED COMMISSION ACTION
The Commission may wish to choose from one of the following actions:
1. Approve Final Order#2017-02.
2. Approve Final Order#2017-02 with modifications.
3. Continue Variance Request#2017-02 for additional information.
4. Deny Final Order#2017-02.
Area Location Map-- Variance Request #2017-02
Address: 9551 Riverview Road,
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55347
�:+;••' IEW IR
HeJnPiIowoa /
nen Rd
Fil
Riverview Road - - - P,IVERV EW RD O
4
SITE
Highway #169
N
0 187.5 375 750 Feet
Guide Plan Map
Variance Request #2017-02
9551 Riverview Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Riverview Road
SITE
Highway #169
Legend
n Lakes -Industrial Streams N
n Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre I Neighborhood Commercial
Principal Arterial
Community Commercial Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre '
—A Minor Arterial
®Low Density/Public/Open Space Regional Commercial '.e—
Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre®Town Center B Minor Arterial
®Medium Density Residential/Office Park/Open Space —Major Collector EDEN
High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre -Public/Quasi-Public m Minor Collector
Airport I I Golf Course
Date Revised 03-01-2014 PRAIRIE
Office -Church/Cemetary
Office/Industrial Open Water
=e-^ •��P°" LIVE•WORK•DAEAM
7 Office/Public/Open Space -Right-Of-Way .e. "•°°1p�°"°"• M•° -°•700 Feet oov.m..° •�°°.mF..m .o m„
0 175 350
I I I I I I
Zoning Map
Variance Request #2017-02
9551 Riverview Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Rivierview Road
.�
I --
Highway #161
SITE
Rural Regional CoC i ty of Eden Prairie Zoning M a p
Shoreland Management Classifications N
R1-44 One Family-44,000 sf.min. I I TC-C NE Natural Environment Waters
R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min. TC-R I RD I Recreational Development Waters
R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min. EA TC-MU I SD I General Development Waters(Creeks Only) ,
R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min. I Industrial Park-2 Acre Min, ® 100- Year Floodplain
RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A.max. I Industrial Park- 5 Acre Min. EDEN
Up dated through approved Ordinances#26-2008
RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A.max. (V General Industrial-5 Acre Min.
Ordinance#33-2001(BFI Addition)approved,but not shown on this map edition PRAIRIE
Office Public Date:March 1,2009
Neighborhood Commercial I Golf Course In case of discrepency related to a zoning classificalon on this zoning map,the Ordinance uve•w0ex•ueenM
a.attached legal description on file at Eden Paide Ciry Center will prevail.
Community Commercial I Water
▪ Highway Commercial I Right of Way 0 0.05 0.1
▪ Regional Service Commercial
Miles
Aerial Map - Variance #2017-02
Address: 9551 Riverview Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55347
) . no 1 . „.:,,.. ,.
)1.: . . •.. . . . ! . .._..
• i
•' Riverview Road , '
i3°'' ' -it:- -ice• G r
41
.r' - M1
o
Highway#169
\ 4i . .
. • '.-ik .
.. •i. - i- • it- 0114 . • ' '
',.' q•19 41../ .
. 1 ...:. -
, ,., _44..
-tr •. .4.,-,....:m.- • -
•
.. -.1 •• !.. ' '- . — " •g ie.
i.-. . i i i i I h ...
VARIANCE#2017-02
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FINAL ORDER 2017-02
APPLICANT:
OWNER: Craig Diederichs
ADDRESS: 9551 Riverview Road, Eden Prairie, MN
OTHER DESCRIPTION: Not Applicable
VARIANCE REQUEST:
Variance to permit a detached garage structure 10' from the (east) side lot line and 10' from the (rear) south lot
line. City Code requires a 30' accessory structure setback from the side and rear lot lines in the Rural Zoning
District.
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals for the City of Eden Prairie at a regular meeting thereof duly considered the
above petition and after hearing and examining all of the evidence presented and the file therein does hereby find and
order as follows:
1. All procedural requirements necessary for the review of said variance have been met. (Yes No N/A).
2. Variance 2017-02 is:
granted
modified
denied
3. Findings and conditions are attached as Exhibit A.
4. This order shall be effective fifteen days after the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals or on October 9,
2017,however,this variance shall expire one year after the date of the approval unless the applicant has
commenced the authorized improvements or use or has received an extension of the time period as provided below.
The applicant may submit a request for a one-time extension of up to one year from the original expiration date.
Said extension shall be requested in writing to the City Planner at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the
approval. The requested extension shall be reviewed by the City Planner. If the facts and circumstances under
which the original variance was granted have not materially changed,the City Planner may approve the extension.
If there has been a material change in circumstance since the granting of the variance,the City Planner shall submit
the request for review and consideration by the Board.
5. All Board of Adjustments and Appeals actions are subject to City Council Review.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
N/A=Not Applicable BY:
Andrew Pieper—Chair
October 9,2017
EXHIBIT A—FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS:
Findings:
Harmony with Purpose and Intent of Ordinance
The approval of the variance is in harmony with City Code requirements. The requested 10' side and rear
yard setback would be consistent with any future R1-9.5, R1-13.5, R1-22 and R1-44 district should the
property ever be rezoned. The new garage will be the same size as the previous garage. The proposed
location of the new garage moves the setbacks closer to compliance with required setbacks than the
previous garage was. The previous garage essentially had a zero foot setback from the rear property line.
The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan
The property's use as a single family residential property is consistent with the current Guide Plan
Designation of Low Density Residential.
Reasonable Use of the Property.
A detached garage is reasonable use of the property.
Unique Circumstances
Unique circumstance, meaning the problem is due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by
the current land owner. The unique circumstance associated with this property include the location of the
existing well, septic system, home site, and mature trees. The property owner did not create the unique
circumstances.
Alteration of the essential character of the neighborhood characteristics
The proposed accessory structure will be in alignment with the neighborhood and an improved
condition to the previous garage setbacks.
Date: September 18th, 2017
To: City of Eden Prairie
From: Craig Diederichs
9551 Riverview Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
City of Eden Prairie,
I am applying for a variance (request#2017-02)to build a new garage in approximately the same
location where the original garage stood on the above property. Because the property is zoned rural, I
am requesting a variance to allow a 10' setback from the east and south lot lines. My understanding is
that the setback requirement is 30' for property zoned rural.
The original garage was approximately 24'wide by 21' long (504 sq ft). A carport that was enclosed on
the front of the garage was approximately 20'wide by 21' long(420 sq ft). In total, the square footage
of the original building was about 924 sq ft. The original garage location is shown having the back wall
on the south lot line with 0' setback. The east wall of the garage is approximately 16' off the current
east lot line.
I would like to build a garage that is 24'wide by 36' long (864 sq ft). The building would be located 10'
from both the east property line and 10'from the south property line.
The original garage was removed due to the poor condition. The destruction occurred over the course
of the summer of 2016. The cement block wall is still standing(southeast wall of building). Water
infiltration through the floor and sides of the building caused black mold and rotting wood that made
the building unsafe. Also,the carport floor was made of asphalt and not even close to level. There were
mice all over in the walls that left the building in a condition not easy to describe.
My property is over 1 acre in total size. However,the area available to build a garage is very limited.
There is a septic field to the west of the proposed new garage (and where old garage was). This septic
system was installed in 2009 and was placed as far from the edge of ravine as possible. For this reason,
it is not possible to move the garage further west. Sometime between when the septic system was
installed in 2009 and now, a 10-foot setback from the septic system was required. The location of the
new garage would comply with this requirement.
The Designer of the septic system installed in 2009, was out on site in August 2017. He found the edge
of the septic field and marked it with two flags. This is the reference position that will be used to
measure a 10-foot setback to the new garage.
There is one other possible location that I could build the garage. It would require that I remove 3 oak
trees that must be between 90 and 110 years old. It would also require fill to be brought in because of
the slope of the property(approximately 4 feet). There are regulations as to how much fill could be
hauled in and limits the changes that could be made. I hate to see these mature trees removed to
accommodate a garage.
I am hopeful that the city will approve the variance so that I can build a new garage in essentially the
same location where the original garage stood while ensuring I comply with the 10' setbacks from
property lines and septic field.
Allowing the variance will give me the opportunity to improve this property. I am requesting a 24' wide
by 36' long garage. The old dimensions of the garage were 20-24'wide by 42' long. I would love to be
able to begin construction on the garage this Fall.
Thank you for your consideration.
Craig Diederichs cell: 952-737-3236
M \ 22-141 30 SHEETS
} 22.142 100 SHEETS
'_- 22-3 44 200 SHEETS
e . f c� 1 — r-t ( _ .-�
c.,, ..,..: 1„ i ',.,40 4 "k 3 /
is
9 5 z �i + Ivtet;i ICI [ .�
J ,
J r
-
_ I
1
i
--tk
1 a1 . u
I
r,`f3 ( 1n
Received - Planning Dept i7 set.6.4 I
SEP 1.5 2017 f . i
` City or Eden Prairie I le
}
VVN :FN- /0 Sefk42t# ( k/77-71.7s:de_ cia, (1A, . // ./ ..-/ / -
.),,, _________,_. ,.,,,,,.. - . / _
cf J } r
A Jve 4 0 i&.::.4c !I tA Ir' I `
c.40-hc... 14.e. t'to,A.-12 )(- /
7 s .F€ f 3
:). 1 .e(7-1 i C.- cis 74,--eci-1,..e yr Fro
____ 0,lv,v, _ 10,4615)
-- cK1*( o -1 -i LH r itidt 0 .- 2- 4.
__.�. la V.1 to t 4-1 e , - ---
• ?lat of Survey . -
fol.. Daniel 1Wi . Phillips �J ckt�, - r- k,. -
LL
;_=, 1,;:+3 SE 1/4 of Section 36, 1115iv, � GSA f�- ,r.
+ P V,°
SC
:I `/
i Q:+ NE comer of SEA. o� '�c
o f Se cilon 3 6.114-2 2---.�. j
P_
ProfOOSel - - i -- -
' Mk 1� ft 8 i, of 33' road
,,„--gil 7 — :400:11r:57.,;.1.5°: 4:g TO; I'Z5 �p
++I ,` 0 tivvs� �, D Q line o� Se '/4d SE !.i.
_ � •C�� �ti�°° •f Soc.3� Ili•22 ✓"
®
�� K ` NI
t:� I:" ..; a QGC p{SW VA. —,_ {n
• r ' seal 3•4•I14-2 . Y� Received - Planning Dept N
_. ,,��= • - SEP 15 2417
ti 1' 1 •
is, F-0,; ...., City of Eden Prairie
pi .) 1 g.' chi'-, - - - - - -477' — — — — — — — — i -
Certificate of Survey: o.
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries
of: LU that part of the West 183 feet of the Fast 660 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of Section '
36, 11.6,N, R2211, lying South of County Road No. 37 as now travelled, and North of the following-
described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of
s::id Section 36; thence South.261.57 feet along the East line thereof; thence West at right
angles to said East line 477 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence •
continuing West to the West line of the Fast 660 feet of said Southeast 1/4 of said Section 36, •
and there ending; P, Together with an easement over all that part of the Southeast 1/4 of said
Ss:;•i+ion 36 lying within 16.5 feet of the following-described centerline: Commencing at the
Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence South
261.57 feet -along the East line thereof; thence West at right angles to said East line 454.37
feet to the point of beginning of the centerline being described; thence deflecting right 69°101
a distance of 18.52 feet to a point of curve; thence deflecting right along a tangential curve
having a radius of 90 feet and delta angle of 92°28' a ci:.'ti.nce of 145.25 feet to its point of
tan'"cr.Cy; thence continuing tangent to last-said curve 62.52 feet to a point of curve; thence
- deflecting left along a tangential curve :.a viine a radius of 100 feat and delta angle of 51°04'
c. distance of 89.13 feet to its point of tinn :ncy; thence continuing tangent to last-said curve
. 63.36 fest to a point of curve; thence deflecting right along a tangential curve having a radius
of 113 feet and delta angle of 5C°30' a distance of 99.60 feet to its point of tangency; thence
f.Fm•tinuing tangent to last-said curve to County Road No. 37 as now travelled, and there ending;
� '.- lbgethcr with an easement over all that part of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 36, T116N,R22W,
doncrii:ed as follows: Cormenc_:; at the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast
1/4 of said Section 36; thence Beath 261.57 feet alone the East line thereof; thence West at
sight angles to said East line 454.37 feet to the point of beginning of the easement being des- -
cribe3; thence deflecting right 69°10' a distance of 18.52 feet to a point of curve; thence de-
flc:tirg right along a tangential curve having a radius of 90 feet and delta angle of 92°28' a -
dLLtanco of 145.25 feet to its point of tangency; thence Northwesterly at right angles to the
t.I.n7rvnt to last-said curve 16.5 feat; thence deflecting left at right angles 70 feet more or less
to the West line of the Fast 477 feet of said Southeast 1/4; thence South along said West line
dc, its intersection with a line drawn thru the point of beginning at right angles to the Fast
line of acid Southeast 1/4; t e:xe East to point of beginning. It does not purport to show
�,_ V.enonty c. ensr,aca...Ents, `i any., ��' u .
,-' s: C�:•i ffrr.1,
1k::,. S. •Kelley,7`;; Reg. No. 1342
.3, 19:9 KELLEY & KELLFJY, Engineers • C+ r 3 Z'g •
0 ..�:I:er Lon; Lake, Minnesota
PROJECT PROFILE - OCTOBER 9, 2017
PLANNING COMMISSION - OCTOBER 9, 2017
1. VARIANCE (2017-02) by Craig Diederichs. (STEVE)
Variance to permit an accessory garage structure 10' from the east side lot line and 10' from the rear
south lot line. City Code requires a 30' accessory structure setback from the side and rear lot line in
the Rural Zoning District.
Location: 9551 Riverview Road, Eden Prairie,MN
Contact: Craig Diederichs—952-737-3236
Application Info Planning Commission City Council _
Date Submitted 09/15/17 Notice to Paper Date 09/21/17 Notice to Paper Date N/A
Date Complete 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 09/22/17 Resident Notice Date N/A
120 Day Deadline 12/14/17 Meeting Date 10/09/17 1"Meeting Date N/A
Initial DRC review 09/21/17 2nd Meeting Date N/A
CONSERVATION COMMISSION - OCTOBER 10, 2017
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION - OCTOBER 16, 2017
1. JOINT MEETING WITH EDEN PRAIRIE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
LOCATION CHANGE TO: J.R. CUMMINS HOUSE, 13600 PIONEER TRAIL
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT - OCTOBER 17, 2017
1. EDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD (2017-13)by Station 19 Architects. (ANGIE)
Proposal for a 12,423 sq.ft one and two story addition and a 4,270 sq.ft. remodel of the main and lower level
on 10.06 acres
Location: 16591 Duck Lake Trail.
Contact: Dan Torgerson—612-623-1800
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Amendment on 10.06 acres
• Site Plan Review on 10.06 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 07/07/17 Notice to Paper Date 07/27/17 Notice to Paper Date 08/17/17
Date Complete 07/07/17 Resident Notice Date 07/28/17 Resident Notice Date 08/18/17
120 Day Deadline 11/04/17 Meeting Date 08/14/17 Pt Meeting Date 09/05/17
Initial DRC review 07/13/17 2nd Meeting Date 10/03/17
1
2. WHITETAIL BLUFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (BETH)
Amendment to Development Agreement
PLANNING COMMISSION - OCTOBER 23, 2017
1. CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO SELF STORAGE FACILITIES —CONTINUED ITEM
2017-14 (STEVE)
Public Hearing amending City Code, Chapter 11,related to self-storage facilities
Contact: Steve Durham, 952-949-8491
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 07/14/17 Notice to Paper Date 08/24/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17
Date Complete N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A Meeting Date 09/11/17 1st Meeting Date 00/00/17
Initial DRC review 08/03/17 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/17
2. CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 2017-18 (JULIE)
Public Hearing amending City Code, Chapter 11,related to Conditional Use Permits
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/04/17 Notice to Paper Date 10/05/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 1
Date Complete N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A Meeting Date 10/23/17 1st Meeting Date 00/00/17
Initial DRC review 10/05/17 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/17
2
IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED
1. EDEN BLUFF 4TH ADDITION (2017-12)by Pope Architects. (BETH)
Proposal is a two phase approach:Phase 1 to construct surface parking of 252 spaces on 11.67acres;Phase 2
will include a new 3 story, 120,000 square foot office building with additional 530 parking spaces.
Location: Charlson Rd&Liatris Ln.
Contact: Paul Holmes—651-642-9200
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.67 acres
• Site Plan Review on 11.67 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 06/26/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17
Date Complete 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/17
120 Day Deadline 00/00/17 Meeting Date 00/00/17 lst Meeting Date 00/00/17
Initial DRC review 06/29/17 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/17
2. WINDSOR PLAZA—FED EX(2017-15)by Windsor Plaza LLC. (ANGIE)
Proposal to complete the interior of the existing vacant space within Windsor Plaza for a retail use instead of
a restaurant use.
Location: 11993 Singletree Lane E
Contact: Matt Karl—952-324-8900
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 0.24 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 0.24 acres
• Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service District on 0.24
acres
• Site Plan Review on 0.24 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/10/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17
Date Complete 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/17
120 Day Deadline 00/00/17 Meeting Date 00/00/17 lst Meeting Date 00/00/17
Initial DRC review 08/17/17 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/17
3
3. ARBY'S (2017-16)by Arc Vision, Inc. (BETH)
Proposal to complete a minor interior remodel, exterior facade improvements,parking lot repaving and
landscaping.
Location: 560 Prairie Center Drive
Contact: Samantha Igou—314-415-2400
Request for:
• Site Plan Review on 1.15 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/25/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17
Date Complete 08/25/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/17
120 Day Deadline 12/22/17 Meeting Date 00/00/17 1"Meeting Date 00/00/17
Initial DRC review 08/31/17 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/17
4. SCHEELS (2017-17)by CAPREF Eden Prairie. (JULIE/BETH)
Proposal to redevelop the current Sears site and associated parking lot improvements with a two level,
248,756 square foot sporting goods/destination store
Location: 8301 Flying Cloud Dr. -Eden Prairie Center
Contact: Jeff Plauche—214-347-7716
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review on approximately 64 acres
• Site Plan Review on approximately 64 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/08/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17
Date Complete 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/17
120 Day Deadline 00/00/17 Meeting Date 00/00/17 Pt Meeting Date 00/00/17
Initial DRC review 09/14/17 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/17
5. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT (2015-23)by SW Metro Transit Commission
(JULIE)
Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.38 acres
• Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on
11.38 acres
• Site Plan Review on 11.38 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 00/00/15 Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15 Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15
Date Complete 00/00/15 Resident Notice Date 11/20/15 Resident Notice Date 12/18/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15 Meeting Date 12/07/15 1st Meeting Date 01/05/16
Initial DRC review 00/00/15 2nd Meeting Date
4
APPROVED VARIANCES
TELECOMMUNICATION PROJECTS
5