HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 09/24/2018
AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, September 24, 2018 - 7:00 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEMBERS:
John Kirk, Charles Weber, Ann Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed
Farr, Mark Freiberg, Michael DeSanctis, Christopher
Villarreal, Carole Mette
STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer;
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
III. MINUTES
A. Approval of the Minutes for the September 10, 2018 meeting
IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
V. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ASPIRE EDEN PRAIRIE 2040 – COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
Request to:
• Recommend approval to City Council of the draft Aspire Eden Prairie 2040
Comprehensive Plan Update
http://www.edenprairie.org/city-government/departments/community-development/planning/aspire-
eden-prairie-2040
VII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VIII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2018 7:00 PM—CITY CENTER
Council Chambers
8080 Mitchell Road
COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Charles Weber, Ann Higgins, Andrew
Pieper, Ed Farr, Mark Freiberg, Michael DeSanctis,
Christopher Villarreal, Carole Mette
CITY STAFF: Julie Klima, City Planner
Rod Rue, City Engineer
Kristin Harley, Recording Secretary
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
Chair Farr called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Absent were commission members Pieper and Villareal.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by Kirk to approve the agenda. MOTION
CARRIED 7-0.
IV. MINUTES
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Higgins to approve the minutes dated August 27,
2018. MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
V. PUBLIC MEETINGS
SMITH VILLAGE
Location: 16389 & 16397 Glory Lane
Request for:
• Guide Plan change from Industrial and Church/Cemetery to Medium High
Density Residential on 7.16 acres
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.16 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 7.16 acres
• Zoning District Change from Pub and I-Gen to RM-2.5 on 7.16 acres
• Site Plan Review on 7.16 acres
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 10, 2018
Page 2
• Preliminary Plat of two lots into five lots and one outlot on 7.16 acres
Mark Nelson of United Properties displayed a PowerPoint and explained the application.
The applicants are proposing to develop the 7.16-acre property into a multi-family
residential project that provides workforce housing, for-sale townhomes, and senior
cooperative units for a total of 164 units. This would include trails and shared amenities
(storm water, parking, et cetera) including a common space. The senior cooperative
would be a HUD-guaranteed cooperative, and 20% (10 homes) would be priced at 80
percent of area median income (AMI). The majority of the parking would be
underground. The units would be mostly two-bedroom units, or one bedroom with a den.
The applicants were partnering with Halley Land Corporation and Common Bond to
construct the development. Of the workforce apartment housing, 52 of those would be
priced at 80 percent or less AMI, and six (10 percent of the apartments) would be priced
at market rate. These would be one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and three-bedroom
apartments ranging from 750 to 1,250 square feet, with monthly rents from $700.00 to
$1,325.00. A sport court and play area was integrated with the site and the trails.
Klima presented the staff report. The property was currently guided public and industrial.
The project did incorporate similar styles and materials to integrate with the surrounding
community, and the applicant was currently seeking funding for part of the project; a
staff recommendation was contingent upon revisions to the plans including access needed
by the City to the proposed partially-underground water reservoir storage facility which
will be constructed on 6.5 acres to the south. Alternatives were proposed but no final
access points were agreed upon, and staff was recommending the applicant return with a
revised access plan. The development included sustainability features and affordability,
and staff wished to continue working with the applicants on this due to recent decisions
made by the City Council. Also, the applicants needed to clarify their landscaping plan.
Several PUD waivers were being requested regarding the number of units (density),
setback, senior parking (1.62 parking stalls per unit instead of the usual two), lot frontage,
and lot depth. Since additional information was necessary in order for staff to complete
its review and provide a recommendation on the application, staff recommended the
public hearing be continued to October 8, 2018 to allow the applicant to revise the
proposal.
Rue gave a brief presentation on the water reservoir storage tank. He stated the City
purchased roughly six acres of land on the opposite side of the regional trail facility from
the development for the ground water reservoir tank, which would hold five million
gallons, either built all at once or in two phases; discussion on this was ongoing. Eden
Prairie presently had two elevated towers whereas this would be a partially buried
cylindrical tank. The City was requesting construction and operational access.
Construction was slated to begin in 2019.
DeSanctis asked if the water tank would be encased in brick as was the one on Mitchell
Road. Rue replied the architecture was not yet determined, but the tank would have a
“depot look” to reflect the structures historically at the site. DeSanctis asked if there
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 10, 2018
Page 3
would be impact on the Red Rock Lake or its adjoining wetland. Rue replied it would not
as this would be water coming from the water plant, and had nothing to do with ground
water or storm water. Kirk asked for the location, and Rue displayed the applicant’s
slides and pointed out the location between the Regional Trail and Highway 212 near
Central Middle School. Freiberg asked for dimensions of the water tank. Rue replied it
was probably 100-200 foot diameter and 40 feet high, with 15 feet below ground and 25
feet above ground. The conceptual designs and layouts were still being created.
DeSanctis asked the applicant if one electrical car charging station was sufficient. Nelson
replied this was a starting point, after which expansion could be considered. Farr asked
for a summary of the neighborhood meeting. Nelson replied one was held at City Hall
and was well attended by residents across from Eden Prairie Road and from Lincoln
Lane. Discussions focused on potential impacts to the Smith House and on the height of
the development. Some residents were in favor of the development due to its focus on
intergenerational diversity. Mette asked how the applicant determined the calculations for
affordable housing, and Nelson replied the Minnesota Financing Agency in collaboration
with HUD supplied those. Mette asked if the rules of the senior cooperative that limited
the value increase to two percent was for 40 years or forever. Nelson explained for the
benefit of the other commission members this was a limited equity cooperative, which
limited the appreciation of the value of the homes to two percent per year. The idea was
to maintain the home values relative to the market and allow senior members to sell if
they must while earning some interest. Nelson was not sure if this rule applied in
perpetuity. HUD and other entities would weigh in on this. Mette asked if there would be
no way to enforce the sale of the affordable units to targeted residents who usually
needed such housing in subsequent sales due to the HUD financing. Nelson replied that
was true; HUD did not allow two classes of membership. This was a corporation in which
residents were buying a share. Sale of affordable units to those needing affordable
housing was encouraged, but could not be forced. However, this as well as the mandated
limit of two percent appreciation in value also prevented flippers or speculators seeking a
“windfall.”
Mette asked what the height of Applewood Pointe was measured from. Klima replied the
City recently revised its definition of heights as from the grade plane to the highest point.
Kirk asked if the financing and two percent limitations were typical of senior
cooperatives in Eden Prairie and surrounding communities. Nelson replied he could not
speak to that, but it was consistent with the United Properties brand. Farr asked for and
received confirmation that there would be a developer agreement. Farr then asked if the
affordable housing requirement would be enforced in perpetuity. Klima replied if the
development agreement, which was a contract that existed between the developer and the
City, included those stipulations there would be no sunset of them and those stipulations
would remain in force consistent with the approved Development Agreement.
DeSanctis stated there is a pedestrian crossing on the west side to Miller Park and
signaled intersections in the northwest and southwest, and asked if a traffic study had
been commissioned. He was concerned about a property attracting seniors that would
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 10, 2018
Page 4
require them to walk across Eden Prairie Road. Nelson replied the study was funded by
the applicants but commissioned through staff. There were two lights, plus seniors tended
to avoid peak traffic times. Farr noted the aerial rendering included a striped pedestrian
crossing at the entrance to Miller Park. Nelson replied that crosswalk coincided with both
Miller Park and the Regional Trail.
Farr invited the public to speak. Donald Hanson of 7936 Timber Lake Drive asked for
and received confirmation the commission received his handout in its packets. He
objected to the development due to its proximity to Eden Prairie Road. This development
would impact three local treasures: Miller Park, the nature trail, and the Smith Douglas
More House. There was no existing building of comparable height in the area, and
therefore this development was not consistent with the rest of the community along the
length of Eden Prairie Road. The entrance to this development would be between the
Smith Douglas More House and the nature trail; this and the development’s design
created visual clutter. Hanson’s idea of nature did not include small intermittent squares
of green and non-earth-tone colored tiles showing above the trees as shown by the
rendering. A successfully contrast to this development was Elim Shores which was
hidden in nature and utilized earth tones.
Joan Howe-Pullis of 8101 Curtis Lane spoke in support the development as an
intergenerational, diverse, and affordable development as a result of collaboration
between multiple developers. She pointed out 68 percent of Eden Prairie residents spent
over 30 percent of net income on housing.
Higgins asked how children needing school buses would be served in this development.
Diana Dyste, project manager of Common Bond Communities, replied this had been
anticipated, and one alternative was utilizing Glory Lane as a turnaround or utilizing
Eden Prairie Road. The applicants would continue to look at this issue. Jesse Menton,
regional manager for Common Bond Communities added it was not uncommon in their
other developments to have buses enter the common area, which was the preferred option
here since Eden Prairie Road was a high traffic route.
Freiberg stated there had been an outstanding cooperation between the three developers
and encouraged more “thinking beyond the box” alternatives to solve the housing
problems in Eden Prairie which had so little land for development. Kirk agreed lifestyle
and affordable housing remained a significant issue in Eden Prairie and would continue
to be; however, longtime residents, who preferred Eden Prairie as it was, had to accept
growth and change in the community. To balance these two needs was the difficulty, and
density and height were part of this balance. This development represented for Kirk a
reasonable compromise. Farr also applauded the applicant for the effort.
Mette agreed the landscaping was more important here than at other sites, and wanted to
see further work on this. She had seen the two other Applewood developments and was
impressed. She stated she felt confident in the developer and the concept; however, she
would like to see a rendering from the trail to confirm how visible the development
would be. The parking waiver requested seemed in line with other Eden Prairie
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 10, 2018
Page 5
developments, especially since these were two- and more bedrooms. DeSanctis agreed
aggressive landscaping was needed, not only for visual impacts but also for acoustical
buffers for residents west, east, and southeast of Highway 212. Hanson responded to
Kirk’s comments, stating he had suggested at the neighborhood meeting the four-story
apartment building be turned on its side, and place the townhomes on the street. This was
in his handout as well. Farr replied the commission and the applicant received his
handout and would consider such a suggestion as well.
Jason Potvin of 8181 Curtis Lane asked where the other projects were so residents could
view them. Mette replied it was near the bridge on Highway 169. Nelson replied there
were developments in Champlin, Minnetonka, Bloomington, New Brighton, Woodbury,
and Shoreview. Farr asked him to email a list of addresses to City staff so that
participants at this meeting and anyone listening either to the live stream or the video
playback of this meeting could contact City staff for these addresses.
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by DeSanctis, to recommend a continuance of the
Smith Village project, based on staff recommendations and information contained in the
staff report, dated September 6, 2018 and plans stamp dated August 29, 2018 to the
October 8, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
VII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VIII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Weber moved, seconded by Higgins, to adjourn the meeting. MOTION
CARRIED 7-0. Chair Farr adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner
DATE: September 21, 2018
PROJECT: Aspire Eden Prairie 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
BACKGROUND
Minnesota statutes require all metropolitan communities to update their comprehensive plans
every 10 years. In 2016, the City initiated the process to update its comprehensive plan branded
Aspire Eden Prairie 2040. The draft Aspire plan can be found at
www.edenprairie.org/aspireep2040.
The City contracted with Houseal Lavigne Associates to assist with the overall process. The
initial phases included broad community engagement activities and an existing conditions
analysis. The community engagement phase included topical discussions with focus groups,
surveys, online feedback through City Connect, Do-It -Yourself (DIY) meetings, presentations to
community groups such as the Chamber of Commerce and Noon Rotary, and attendance at
community events such as Arts in the Park and the Home Town Celebration. The existing
conditions analysis included field review and analysis of existing policy plans, studies and
reports.
The subsequent phases included further study and the drafting the Comprehensive Plan chapters.
Supplemental studies providing details on housing and transportation have also been completed
to augment Aspire Eden Prairie 2040. Throughout the outreach, analysis and drafting phases of
the project, the City Council and Planning Commission have been actively involved in
discussions held at City Council work sessions in order to provide feedback and policy direction
on the overall plan and specific topic items. The draft plan incorporates the feedback and
recommendations from these studies, community outreach and Commission and Council review.
The draft Aspire Eden Prairie 2040 plan was distributed for review by the general public and
affected jurisdictions in May 2018. Affected jurisdictions include adjacent communities,
counties, school districts and watershed districts. Aspire was also reviewed on a more detailed
level throughout the summer months by the Planning Commission. This review included
discussion of individual chapters allowing the Commission to provide any feedback or questions
that it may have.
The purpose of the public hearing is to allow comment by the general public on Aspire. In
addition to the public hearing at Planning Commission, a public hearing will also be held at the
City Council level. Following review by the Planning Commission and City Council,
comprehensive plans also require submittal, review and approval by the Metropolitan Council.
Formal submittal to the Metropolitan Council is due by Dec. 31, 2018.
Staff Report – Aspire Eden Prairie 2040
September 21, 2018
Page 2
With this cycle of comprehensive plan updates, the Met Council has initiated a preliminary
review option. This option allows communities to submit draft plans and receive feedback prior
to formal submittal of the draft plan. Met Council comments are offered to inform communities
of any information that may be need to be added or further supplemental data that is necessary
for the Met Council to complete its review of the plan for conformance with regional policies.
Eden Prairie has submitted its draft for review and has received preliminary review comments
back from the Metropolitan Council. Some changes have already been made to the Aspire plan
to address Met Council comments. City s taff and HLA continue to provide other necessary
refinements. These revisions do not affect over the overall goals and directions of the plan but
rather provide additional supporting documentation, more detailed explanations, and
clarifications of items to improve functionality and readability of the plan. The draft that has
been provided to the Planning Commission reflects the purposes, goals, and development
patterns that have been discussed through the drafting process and the chapter by chapter review
over the summer.
PLAN ORGANIZATION
Aspire Eden Prairie 2040 is comprised of the following chapters.
1. Eden Prairie Today;
2. Eden Prairie Tomorrow;
3. Land Use & Development;
4. Housing & Residential Areas;
5. Economic Competitiveness;
6. Transportation & Accessibility;
7. Community Facilities;
8. Parks & Open Space;
9. Water Resources & Infrastructure;
10. Special Study Areas; and
11. Implementation.
Beyond these required elements of the Comprehensive Plan, Aspire Eden Prairie 2040
incorporates local priorities of sustainability, equity and diversity, and community health.
Throughout the entire document, call-outs are included covering these topic areas to promote
education and best management practices.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the draft Aspire Eden Prairie 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
1
PROJECT PROFILE – SEPTEMBER 24, 2018
PLANNING COMMISSION – SEPTEMBER 24, 2018
1. ASPIRE EDEN PRAIRIE 2040 by City of Eden Prairie (JULIE)
Proposed updates for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review N/A
Notice to Paper Date 09/06/18
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 09/24/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 00/00/18
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/18
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT– OCTOBER 2, 2018
1. LION’S TAP SITE IMPROVEMENTS (2018-05) by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (BETH)
Proposal for site and building improvements on the property due to the realignment of Spring Road and
reconfiguration of the lots. The improvements include adding and reconfiguring parking, updating signage,
and adding a new vestibule onto the building
Location: 16180 Flying Cloud Dr.
Contact: John Shardlow, 651-967-4560
Request for:
• Comprehensive Plan Amendment guiding to Rural and Neighborhood Commercial
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 2.2 acres
• Zoning District Change to Rural and Highway Commercial
• Site Plan Review on 2.2 acres
• Preliminary Plat reconfiguring two lots on 11.69 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 04/02/18
Date Complete 07/05/18
120 Day Deadline 11/01/18
Initial DRC review 01/25/18
Notice to Paper Date 07/26/18
Resident Notice Date 07/27/18
Meeting Date 08/13/18
Notice to Paper Date 08/16/18
Resident Notice Date 08/17/18
1st Meeting Date 09/04/18
2nd Meeting Date 10/02/18
2
2. ABRA AUTO BODY (2018-10) by Oppidan Inc. (JULIE)
Proposal for construction of a new Abra Auto Body and Glass building.
Location: 13045, 13075 & 13105 Pioneer Trail.
Contact: Paul Tucci, 952-294-0353
Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Community Commercial to Industrial on 2.98 acres
• Zoning District Change from C-COM to I-2 on 2.98 acres
• Site Plan Review on 2.98 acres
• Preliminary Plat of three lots into one lot on 2.98 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/18/18
Date Complete 06/29/18
120 Day Deadline 10/28/18
Initial DRC review 05/24/18
Notice to Paper Date 07/19/18
Resident Notice Date 07/13/18
Inform Meeting Date 07/23/18
Notice to Paper Date 07/26/18
Resident Notice Date 07/27/18
P.H. Meeting Date 08/13/18
Notice to Paper Date 08/02/18
Resident Notice Date 08/03/18
1st Meeting Date 08/21/18
2nd Meeting Date 10/02/18
PLANNING COMMISSION – OCTOBER 8, 2018
1. SMITH VILLAGE (2018-12) by United Properties. (BETH) - CONTINUED ITEM
Proposal for construction of 100 unit senior cooperative, 58 unit workforce apartment building and 6 custom
for-sale townhomes
Location: 16389 & 16397 Glory Lane
Contact: Mark Nelson, 952-820-8727
Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Industrial and Church/Cemetery to Medium High Density
Residential on 7.16 acres
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.16 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 7.16 acres
• Zoning District Change from Pub and I-Gen to RM-2.5 on 7.16 acres
• Site Plan Review on 7.16 acres
• Preliminary Plat of two lots into five lots and one outlot on 7.16 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 06/08/18
Date Complete 08/14/18
120 Day Deadline 12/11/18
Initial DRC review 06/14/18
Notice to Paper Date 08/23/18
Resident Notice Date 08/24/18
Meeting Date 09/10/18
Continued to 10/08/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
1st Meeting Date 00/00/18
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/18
3
2. EDEN BLUFF 4th ADDITION (CH ROBINSON) (2017-12) by Pope Architects. (ANGIE)
Proposal to construct surface parking on 11.67 acres. Subsequent phases propose to include the construction
of a 120,000 sq. ft. two-story office building with additional parking.
Location: Charlson Rd & Liatris Ln.
Contact: Paul Holmes – 651-642-9200
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.67 acres
• Site Plan Review on 11.67 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 06/26/17
Date Complete 08/28/18
120 Day Deadline 12/25/18
Initial DRC review 06/29/17
Notice to Paper Date 09/20/18
Resident Notice Date 09/21/18
Meeting Date 10/08/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
1st Meeting Date 00/00/18
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/18
CONSERVATION COMMISSION – OCTOBER 9, 2018
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION – OCTOBER 15, 2018
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT– OCTOBER 16, 2018
1. LINCOLN PARC APARTMENTS/CASCADE AT TOWN CENTER (2018-08) by Magellan
Investment partners. LLC (JULIE)
Proposal for improvements and upgrades to Lincoln Parc Apartments and conversion of a portion of the
ground floor uses from retail/office to residential.
Location: 8090 Eden Road.
Contact: Mark Thieroff, 612-337-6102
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.83 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.83 acres
• Zoning District Change from C-COM to TC-MU on 4.83 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/11/18
Date Complete 06/01/18
120 Day Deadline 10/29/18
Initial DRC review 05/17/18
Notice to Paper Date 06/07/18
Resident Notice Date 06/08/18
Meeting Date 06/25/18
Notice to Paper Date 06/27/18
Resident Notice Date 06/29/18
1st Meeting Date 07/17/18
2nd Meeting Date 10/16/18
4
PLANNING COMMISSION – OCTOBER 22, 2018
1. NOTERMANN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (2018-15) by Stantec Consulting Services,
Inc. (BETH)
Proposal to change the guiding and zoning on the property described below
Location: Northwest quadrant of Flying Cloud Drive and Spring Road
Contact: John Shardlow, 651-967-4560
Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Rural to Low Density Residential on 8.34 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 9.54 acres
• MUSA Boundary extension
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/02/18
Date Complete 08/23/18
120 Day Deadline 12/21/18
Initial DRC review 08/09/18
Notice to Paper Date 10/04/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
Meeting Date 10/22/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
1st Meeting Date 00/00/18
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/18
2. CODE AMENDMENT FOR ADULT USE ESTABLISHMENTS AND PAWN SHOPS (2018-
04) by City of Eden Prairie (PLANNING STAFF)
Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to Adult Businesses and Pawn Shops
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Request:
• Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to Adult Businesses and Pawn Shops
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 03/16/18
Date Complete 00/00/18
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review 00/00/18
Notice to Paper Date 10/04/18
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 10/22/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
1st Meeting Date 00/00/18
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/18
5
IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED
1. RESEARCH RELATED TO FIREARM SALES (2018-13) by City of Eden Prairie (PLANNING
STAFF)
Research regulations relating to Firearm Sales
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Request:
• To Research regulations relating to Firearm Sales
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 03/16/18
Date Complete 00/00/18
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review 00/00/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 00/00/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
1st Meeting Date 00/00/18
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/18
2. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT (2015-23) by SW Metro Transit Commission
(JULIE)
Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.38 acres
• Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on
11.38 acres
• Site Plan Review on 11.38 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 00/00/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date 11/20/15
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15
Resident Notice Date 12/18/15
1st Meeting Date 01/05/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/17
6
3. VARIANCE# 2018-02 by Anderson-Johnson Associates, Inc. (ANGIE)
Location: 13400 Staring Lake
Contact: Jay Pomeroy, 763-544-7129
Request for:
• Variance from Shoreland Code to allow impervious surface to exceed the City Code
requirement of 30%.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 06/20/18
Date Complete 00/00/18
120 Day Deadline 00/00/18
Initial DRC review 07/12/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
Meeting Date 00/00/18
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A
4. PETERSON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (2018-16) by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
(JULIE)
Proposal to change the guiding and zoning on the property described below
Location: Northeaset quadrant of Flying Cloud Drive and Spring Road
Contact: John Shardlow, 651-967-4560
Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Rural to Low Density Residential on 12.3 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 12.3 acres
• MUSA Boundary extension
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/02/18
Date Complete 00/00/18
120 Day Deadline 00/00/18
Initial DRC review 08/09/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
Meeting Date 00/00/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
1st Meeting Date 00/00/18
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/18
7
5. GANDER OUTDOOR/CAMPING WORLD (2018-18) by Camping World Holdings, Inc.
(JULIE)
Proposal for permanent outdoor display and minor parking lot and landscape improvements
Location: 12160 Technology Dr.
Contact: Brett Moody, 6847-229-6457
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.69 acres
• Site Plan Review on 4.69 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/27/18
Date Complete 00/00/18
120 Day Deadline 00/00/18
Initial DRC review 08/30/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
Meeting Date 00/00/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
1st Meeting Date 00/00/18
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/18
6. SOUTHWEST TRANSIT GARAGE (2018-19) by Len Simich. (BETH)
Location: 14405 W 62nd St
Contact: Len Simich, 952-814-5800
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 10.05 acres
• Site Plan Review on 10.05 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/31/18
Date Complete 00/00/18
120 Day Deadline 00/00/18
Initial DRC review 09/06/18
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/18
Resident Notice Date 00/00/18
Meeting Date 00/00/18
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A
APPROVED VARIANCES
8
TELECOMMUNICATION
1. TELECOMMUNICATIONS #2018-07TM by SAC Wireless for AT&T (c/o – Ariel Stouder) (STEVE)
Request: To upgrade antenna on existing street light pole
Location: 9100 Riley Lake Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Contact: Ariel Stouder, 312-971-7588.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/29/18
Date Complete 05/29/18
90 Day Deadline 08/27/18
Initial DRC review 06/07/18
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date N.A
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A
2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS #2018-11TM by Buell Consulting, for Verizon Wireless c/o – Renee
Fontaine) (STEVE)
Request: To upgrade antenna on Water Tank
Location: 6341 Baker Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Contact: Renee Fontaine, 773-530-1708.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 07/05/18
Date Complete 00/00/18
90 Day Deadline 10/03/18
Initial DRC review 07/12/18
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date N.A
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A