HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 09/12/2016
AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, September 12, 2016, 7:00 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEMBERS:
John Kirk, Jon Stoltz, Charles Weber, Travis Wuttke, Ann
Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Mark Freiberg, Tom Poul
STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer;
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
III. MINUTES
A. Approval of the Minutes for the August 22, 2016 meeting
IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
V. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
VII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
A. DESIGN STANDARDS UPDATE
B. TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) UPDATE
VIII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
ANNOTATED AGENDA
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner
RE: Planning Commission Meeting for Monday, September 12, 2016
_______________________________________________________________________________
MONDAY, September 12, 2016 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE- ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Move to approve the agenda.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION: Move to approve the Planning Commission minutes:
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY, August 22, 2016
V. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
VIII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
A. DESIGN STANDARDS UPDATE
The City has contracted with Hay Dobbs to work on the Design Standards initiative. At the
July 19 and September 6 City Council work sessions, Hay Dobbs presented information
addressing building materials, architecture, landscaping, sustainability and public art.
These discussions included current code requirements for each of the topic areas and also
provided recommendations to provide further clarification in either the creation of design
guidelines or amendments to the City Code. Staff will review with the Commission the
presentations that were provided to the City Council (these presentations are attached) and
seek feedback from the Commission prior to coming forward with draft design guidelines
and code amendments.
B. TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) UPDATE
The City Council approved the Transit Oriented Development Ordinance on August 16,
2016. Staff will provide a review of the final adopted ordinance highlighting
modifications that were made to the ordinance following Planning Commission review.
This item is for informational purposes. No formal action is required at this time.
ANNOTATED AGENDA
September 12, 2016
Page 2
IX. MEMBERS’ REPORT
X. CONTINUING BUSINESS
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Move to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, AUGUST 22, 2016 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER
Council Chambers
8080 Mitchell Road
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Jon Stoltz, John Kirk, Travis Wuttke, Ann Higgins,
Charles Weber, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Mark
Freiberg, Tom Poul
CITY STAFF: Julie Klima, City Planner
Rod Rue, City Engineer
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
Julie Krull, Recording Secretary
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Vice Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Stoltz, Weber and Wuttke were
absent.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Poul moved, seconded by Higgins, to approve the agenda. Motion carried 6-0.
III. MINUTES
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 8, 2016
Klima said that Wuttke had notified her that he had to revisions to the minutes. The
first revision is on page 2, the second to the last paragraph and the second to the last
sentence. He would like it to read, “Wuttke said he is concerned about approving
these variances as the code amendment has not yet been approved by the Council.”
The second revision in on page 5 under Members’ Report. He would like the first
sentence to read, “Wuttke said he noticed the parks are heavy trafficked now by users
of augmented reality video games and would like to encourage users and parents of
kids to be safe and to know and be respectful of public and private property rights.”
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Farr, to approve the amended Planning
Commission Minutes. Motion carried 6-0.
IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
August 22, 2016
Page 2
V. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PRAIRIE BLUFFS SENIOR LIVING
Location: 10217, 10220, 10240, 10280 Hennepin Town Road and two additional
parcels (PID’s: 36-116-22-11-0026 and 36-116-22-11-0003)
Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Office to High
Density Residential on 4/74 acres
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.74 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.74 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural and Office to RM-2.5 on 4.74 acres
• Site Plan Review on 4.74 acres
• Preliminary Plat of six lots into one lot and one outlot on 4.74 acres
Link Wilson, of Kaas Wilson Architects, presented the proposal. Mr. Wilson stated
on April 25, 2016 they postponed the public hearing before the City Council
because there were discussions on possibly adding the Robertson property, which
would change the project. The revised proposal was submitted on July 13, 2016 to
include the Robertson property. Because of this, the building and site layout have
changed significantly. The changes are as follows:
1. The acreage of the site has increased from 3.37 acres to 4.74 acres;
2. There are now two buildings connected by a skyway;
3. The buildings are 3 story except for a portion of the north building, which is
proposed to be 4 stories;
4. The number of units has increased from 116 to 138;
5. The density has decreased from 34.7 units per acre to 29.1 units per acre;
6. Trails and walking paths have been added on the property for the residents;
7. Community rooms, day rooms and other amenities have been added;
8. There is surface parking behind each of the buildings and overall there are 29
more parking stalls; and
9. There have been façade improvements including the addition of balconies and
other architectural features.
Mr. Wilson said they will also be providing access to the City’s infrastructure in the
northeast corner of the site via a paved drive between the parking lots.
Vice Chair Pieper asked Klima to review the staff report. Klima said the request is
for a comp plan amendment and rezoning requests, plus waivers. Because the site
is a senior resident building they are requesting a reduction in parking. There have
also been modifications in building materials and gathering areas for the residents.
Project Proponent is including affordability in this proposal and City Council will
take this into consideration when they review it. There are two communications
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
August 22, 2016
Page 3
from nearby residents that wanted their views to be known for the record and they
are included in the packet. Also, the triangular piece of MnDOT right of way south
of the driveway entrance into the project area has been conveyed to the City and the
excess right-of-way has been incorporated into the project. Staff is recommending
approval based on recommendations in the staff report.
Vice Chair Pieper opened the meeting up for public input.
Tom Wohler, of 10335 Normandy Crest, who is representing the town home
association, said they are concerned about the parking available on site and they do
not feel it will meet the needs for this project. Their concern was that since there is
not street parking available, they would be parking in their areas when there is not
available parking on site. They also feel there would be added traffic to the area
and they are concerned about the tree loss.
Resident, (did not identify himself, only to say he lived across the property), asked
what the distance was that the building was moved and if the height of the 4-story
building was only 50 feet high.
Annette O’Connor, of 10444 Swans Way, said she brought along emails from
residents in the area that are opposed to this project. She stated that she and others
think the height waiver is too high, and are opposed to the density change. They
also see the parking as an issue, as well as the added traffic to the area. And also
stated, putting a high building in the area would look out of place. They have
concerns with the tree replacement as well as the right turn lane into the
development. She stated they live in a residential area and now are going to have a
commercial building in the area, which will be out of context in the area. She said
they are not opposed to senior living in the property but it is the magnitude of the
property.
Eric Barton, of 9902 Lee Drive, said the back of my house faces this development
and would like to address a few things tonight. The architect said this development
is being placed in an area where there are 3-story houses, and that is simply not the
case. Most homes in the area are 2-story houses, unless the architect is counting
basement windows. But the concern is the setback. This is the gateway to the
neighborhood, down Hennepin Town Road. The first thing you will see coming
into this development is a 4-story building. They are asking for a setback area for
this building and a height waiver. The tall building by the road a problem because
it affects the feel of the neighborhood. In looking at other senior housing
developments in Eden Prairie, they are not in residential areas, but rather
commercial areas and are set back further from the roads. He stated they want a
feel where this is a walkable neighborhood and this project would not promote that.
He would ask when considering the variance requests, how this development would
fit in with the whole neighborhood and would urge Commission to reject this plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
August 22, 2016
Page 4
Tim Beutell, 9890 Lee Drive, said he has lived in this area for about 27 years and
have seen things change and develop. He feels this project is being squeezed into
this area and would like the Commission to consider rejecting it.
Steve Mohn, of 9812 Lee Drive, said he also feels this project is too much for this
area. This is residential area and should have the lower density. He said he
understands this is a difficult property to build on but we feels it is too big for the
area.
Vice Chair Pieper asked Mr. Wilson to address the comments and questions. Mr.
Wilson said this is not cheap land that is for sale today. And because of that, they
want to control what goes in there. Also, in the 1940’s and 1950’s, he said there
was a surge of baby boomers and now we are seeing those same people needed
housing. They do live in this community and deserve an opportunity to stay here.
There was a statement that there was not enough parking and staff would park
outside. That is not correct as staff will park inside, underground. He said there is
more underground parking than what is needed and the memory care residents at
this facility will not utilize the parking. Because of that, there should be plenty of
parking for family and visitors. During the holidays they can utilize parking at the
retail areas across the street and they will also look into a valet service. There are a
lot of trees onsite and they have a very robust replacement plan in place. He said
they are also willing to add more trees to the area. In regards to the setbacks, there
was a question as to how far is the building moved back and that would be 10 feet
as they want to be close to 169. And the question was how tall the building is and
that is 38 feet. That building is over 30 feet away from the curb and that is the
closest location we are to the curb. He also pointed out on the PowerPoint that the
portion of the building closet to the road is 3 stories high. Mr. Wilson said this
development will have significantly less traffic than Summit Place in Eden Prairie,
because they do not have physical therapy there and there were also Minnesota
Vikings that would use the facility for their whirlpool for therapy and they have the
same amount of surface parking as the new development. And because of that, they
will not have that traffic in the area. If this site was developed into office or single
family homes it would generate more traffic. Ben Baelish, stated the traffic study
was done with what the property was zoned currently. It stated the study would
produce less traffic with this project in the area. Mr. Wilson stated they are 30 feet
from the curb and he understands the resident’s concerns when they state it will be a
dense project but he assures them it will not be the case.
Farr asked Mr. Wilson what was the outcome of the neighborhood meeting. Mr.
Wilson said the three story building has a shift back and that was adjusted after the
meeting, as it was straight prior to the meeting.
Vice Chair Pieper asked the city to address the right turn lane. Rue said this right
turn lane is not getting added now, but will be done by the City in the future. Vice
Chair Pieper asked if there were any issues in regards to traffic with this project.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
August 22, 2016
Page 5
Rue said in regards to their traffic study it shows there is no significant shift if
traffic. With this project there would be more traffic throughout the day, rather than
at peak times. The right turn lane would help, but the City would have to save up
for that. Mr. Wilson stated that was in their budget to build that right turn lane and
they would be willing to work with the City to get this installed and they can offer
that on the table tonight.
Mr. Barton stated the project proponent did not show a 4-story building at the
meeting so he is unsure where this came from. He expressed concern with the
changes and also need for additional amenities. He stated he doesn’t feel this isn’t
an appropriate use of land but just feels it is too much for this piece of property.
Farr asked about the traffic study and asked if there was any thought about
pedestrian movement if the residents would be crossing the street going to
Walgreens. Rue said that signal to go across the street would be adjusted to allow
seniors time to cross the street.
Farr asked about the triangular parcel on this project. Klima said the triangular
MnDOT site, MnDOT is conveying that to the City, so they would have it now and
an encroachment agreement would have to be drawn up and the City would not
have liability for it.
Farr asked about the existing tree height and when they are taken down there will be
a loss and could the project proponent address the comparison to this tree loss.
Bourne said there have not been any specific heights that have been measured, but
there are some larger ones that will come down but the majority will stay.
Freiberg asked the project proponent if they can increase the caliber of trees being
replaced. Mr. Wilson said they could absolutely replace with larger trees.
Freiberg said in regards to the 4-story building, he understands what the residents
are saying in regards to height and asked if it be lowered to a 3-story building. Mr.
Wilson said we are trying to accommodate affordability and this was a resolve. He
also stated in regards to the residents walking to Walgreen’s, there is a van that
takes people to and from the building.
Higgins commented that affordability was an issue when this was brought up in the
previous meeting and she would hate to see this go. There is a new community that
is going to come together with this development and she is encouraged by what was
said previously in the presentation.
Kirk said he appreciates the neighbors’ responses and knows that it is a tough
situation when there is a development coming into an area where there has not been
any development. Unfortunately, someone owns this property and they have the
right to have it developed, but said the Commission understands the impact on the
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
August 22, 2016
Page 6
neighbors. He stated he knows there is a strong need for senior housing and would
like to see Eden Prairie offer this to those residents. There is no easy decision on a
development like this but it is important to think what would go into this area if the
senior housing was not developed.
Karen Flood, of 9870 Lee Drive, said she has a question about traffic coming off
Normandy Crest. Are new stop lights going in at that intersection? Rue said a
signal would not be justified in that area and in regards to a four way stop, that may
not be feasible either.
Farr said in regards to the scale of the building, he did not see the length of the
building, but in regards to the height and mass, he stated it is a very substantial
building and is looking for a buffer from the building to the neighbors. A gesture to
the loss of trees on this property may be an upgrade to the landscaping in this area
so it looks like a balanced effect when approaching the development. Also, if the
buildings were disconnected and not one building, no one would know that, so the
ins and outs are very important. To have that look something different to break up
the north and south masses may help. The step down effect was successful in
regards to the roof line and would be nice if this could be done on the longer
building.
Vice Chair Pieper asked City staff to address funding for right turn lane. Rue said
this could be a possibility to work with and partner with them.
Vice Chair Pieper asked in regards to tree loss, would the City be willing to work
with the developer. Bourne said they would work with the developer.
Farr said this is a good use for the land and he is fine with traffic in the area. He is
also concerned with the neighbors in the area and would like the developer to
upgrade the landscaping in the area. He would like them to add strategic features
and also caliber inches in regards to the trees.
Freiberg said he is having a hard time supporting the 4-story building and cannot
see this as not being a problem. He also stated we must realize this property will
get developed and as a Commission must decide what is best for the area.
Higgins asked if the additional landscaping Farr was referencing would require the
project proponent to come back before the Commission. Klima said it could be
brought back before the Commission or could be made as a recommendation to
move onto City Council. Higgins said she would rather it be a recommendation.
She also sees that the 4-story is a problem with the neighbors but she also would
like to see this project more forward in its current form of 4-story.
Poul said he is supportive of this project moving forward.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
August 22, 2016
Page 7
Kirk said this is a good alternative for the area and he does support it moving
forward. Vice Chair Pieper is also in favor.
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Farr, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried 6-0.
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Farr, to recommend approval of the Guide
Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Office to High Density Residential
on 4.74 acres; Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.74 acres; Planned
Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4/74 acres; Zoning District
Change from Rural and Office to RM-2.5 on 4.74 acres; Site Plan Review on 4/74
acres and Preliminary Plat of six lots into one lot and one outlot on 4.74 acres based
on the plans stamped dated August 17, 2016 and the information included in the
staff report dated August 17, 2016 with the additional recommendation that the City
continue discussion with the project proponent with the goal of enhancing the
landscaping including facilitating landscaping blending with neighborhood and
ways to facilitate the right turn lane in the shortest amount of time. Motion carried
5-1 (Freiberg).
B. VARIANCE 2016-08
Location: 11000 West 78th Street
Request to:
• Allow a variance for proposed exterior screening and improvements to an
existing building that would exceed the maximum building height permitted
by City Code.
Steve Klineman, of SKD Architects, showed a PowerPoint of the project. He said
they have been developing this project since 2007 and are here tonight to beautify
the building and would like to integrate the mechanical screening and create more
of a cap to the building to create an interesting structure to the building. He stated
there are a lot of grade changes on the site. The parking lot is also very steep so this
was a difficult project to work with. The owner wanted to add stone to the building
and that is shown in the pictures. The mechanical equipment is also extending
above the roof. Their goal is to recreate a finished top to the building and they had
to be careful with what they were adding to the building in regard to weight, so the
product is very light weight. Mr. Klineman also showed a 3-D diagram of the
proposed building. He said they feel this is in character with other buildings that
have been approved in the past and an improvement to the existing structure.
Vice Chair Pieper asked Klima to review the staff report. Klima said 4 feet of this
proposal was approved in 1984, so the Commission is just actually approving 10
feet tonight. Staff is recommending approval based on the staff report
recommendations.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
August 22, 2016
Page 8
Poul stated it is a very nice project and looks good. Freiberg and Kirk concurred.
Vice Chair Pieper opened the meeting up for public input. There was no input.
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by Kirk, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried 6-0.
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by Kirk, to approve the Final Order 2016-08
to grant a 14 foot building height variance, subject to the information included in
the staff report dated August 17, 2016 and the building height shall not exceed 54
feet as depicted on the site plans prepared by SKD Architects, Inc. Dated 7/22/16.
Motion carried 6-0.
VII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
A. CODE AMENDMENT – FLOOD PLAIN
Rue stated the City received a letter in early May from FEMA that new Flood Plain
maps were approved and would become effective November 4, 2016 and we need to
update our code amendment with these new changes. In order for citizens in Eden
Prairie to buy discounted insurance through FEMA, Rue stated we do have to adopt this
tonight. The maps are now digitized. Most areas did not change in Eden Prairie.
FEMA has accepted the 9 Mile Creek model. What we are asking for tonight is for the
Commission to recommend to City Council to amend this code change.
Higgins asked about the Minnesota River flood plain and if those requirements that are
in code now will stay the same. Rue said this new flood plain change will take affect
over the old one.
Rue said there were about 150 properties that were impacted by this change and notices
will be sent out to these homeowners of the changes. This process is to get this new
code amendment in place before November 4th.
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Freiberg, to recommend to the City Council
approval of an amendment to the City Code to meet the standards required for
participation in the National Flood Protection Program as outlined in the Code of
Federal Regulations, based on the information included in the staff report dated August
17, 2016. Motion carried 6-0.
VIII. MEMBERS’ REPORT
IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS
X. NEW BUSINESS
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
August 22, 2016
Page 9
Poul asked Klima if there is to be discussion on a senior housing ordinance. Klima said
this will be addressed at the next Planning Commission meeting.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Farr, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
Chair Stoltz adjourned the meeting at 9:07p.m.
C ity of E d E n P rairi E
d E sign s tandards
Project Context
• Elected officials initiated
• Desire to improve aesthetic quality of city
• Desire guidelines to support this effort
• Hay Dobbs Team engaged mid 2016
• Should include both site design and building design
Approach
• Citywide standards for most building types and uses - (not single family)
• Development expectations made clear up-front and early
• Articulating urban design objectives and amending specific code language
• Should allow for flexibility
• Focus on highest impact actions without dampening development
Objectives of Workshop
• Understand how Guidelines and Zoning Code will work together
• Support for Architectural and Exterior Building Code Framework
• Understand Landscape and Sustainability will be addressed at later date
Structure
Zoning Ordinance Changes
Design Guidelines
• Guidelines will work together with Zoning Changes to get results
• Guidelines will influence and inform Comprehensive Plan
• Zoning Changes and Guidelines will be adopted
Guidelines Framework
• Vision
• Values - High Quality, Timeless, Sustainable, Business Friendly
• Expectations - Walkable, Resilient, Aesthetically Pleasing, Durable, Cohesive
Buildings Landscaping
Sustainability Public Art
Site Design Building Form Materials
Orientation
Massing/Scale
Articulation/Texture
Facade
Doors/Windows
Roofs
Stormwater
Paving
Parking
Screening
Plant Materials
Design Guidelines
Fenestration
Encourage - Incent - Require
• Guidelines Encourage
• Guidelines Describe the “why?” and provide tools for Staff
• Ordinance Language (Code) will create requirements and encourage
• Incentives (Landscape?) can be used to support both Guidelines and Code
Proposed Code Changes
Proposed Code Changes
Buildings and Architecture
• Landscape, Sustainability and Public Art will follow in September
• Following examples describe key focus areas and will be expanded further
• Code Changes and Guidelines will evolve together
• Public Review will follow
Proposed Code Changes
Building Orientation
• Primary building entries shall be architecturally emphasized using design features such as protruding and/or recessed entries, unique materials or architectural details.
• Sides of buildings that face a public street or sidewalk shall have one or more entrances.
Proposed Code Changes
Building Articulation
• Building facades greater than 40 feet in length (80 feet in I Districts) shall include recess-es or projections in the facade, material changes, and/or other methods of articulation that create visual interest
• In 3+ story buildings, the ground level must be visually distinct
Proposed Code Changes
Varied Rooflines
• In 1 or 2 story buildings with “flat” roofs, parapet heights should be varied by no less than 1 foot on every facade other than the single facade of the primary service side of the building (loading, trash, mechanical etc.).
• Major building elements may be used achieve the effect of a varied parapet as well, including the use of bays, projections, sign panels, canopies, or other similar elements.
Proposed Code Changes
Roofline Type
• Gabled and hipped roofs will be encouraged near residential or other similarly scaled buildings or neighborhoods
Proposed Code Changes
Fenestration
• In Commercial (C) Districts, 50% of the ground floor facade that is generally visible by the public shall be designed to include transparent windows and/or doors to minimize large expanses of blank walls.
Proposed Code Changes
Building Materials
• 75% of building exterior facades shall consist of at least 3 Class I contrasting yet comple -mentary materials. Fewer than 3 materials may be used to create a similar effect to contrast-ing materials through varied texture, pattern or color.
• Preferred Class I materials include Brick, Stone and Glass. Other other allowable Class I ma-terials include Cast Stone, Cultured Stone, Architectural Precast, Architectural Metal Panels, Fiber Cement products, Precast Concrete Panels with sufficient texture and articulation.
• Vinyl or plastic shall only be used as trim or edging material
Next Steps
- Finalize Design Guidelines
- Landscape, Sustainability and Public Art Workshop in August
- Finalize Zoning Language Changes
- Public Review and Adoption Process
C ity of E d E n P rairi E
d E sign s tandards
Buildings Landscaping
Sustainability Public Art
Site Design Building Form Materials
Orientation
Massing/Scale
Articulation/Texture
Facade
Doors/Windows
Roofs
Stormwater
Paving
Parking
Screening
Plant Materials
Design Guidelines
Fenestration
Encourage - Incent - Require
• Guidelines Encourage
• Guidelines Describe the “why?” and provide tools for Staff
• Ordinance Language (Code) will create requirements
• Incentives can be used to achieve goals of both Guidelines and Code
Sustainability 101
• Sustainability is partially codified (IBC, ASHRAE, ANSI A117, NFPA)
• Sustainability includes design/const. process; bldg. systems; bldg. operations
and site improvements
• Much of “sustainability” is tracking and measuring what we’re already doing
• Designing sustainable projects requires balancing outcomes with process
Possible Topical Areas
• Sustainable Sites
• Water Efficiency
• Energy and Atmosphere
• Materials and Resources
• Indoor Environmental Quality
Proposed Code Changes
Current Zoning Code Guidelines Proposed Code
Orientation Partial Yes Yes
Articulation Partial Yes Yes
Rooflines/Roofs No Yes Yes
Fenestration Partial Yes Yes
Façade Materials Partial Yes Yes
Door and Window Materials No Yes Yes
Sustainable Sites Partial Yes Partial
Water Efficiency No Yes Partial
Energy and Atmosphere Yes Yes Yes
Materials and Resources No Yes No
Indoor Environmental Quality Partial Yes No
Art within the site No Yes Yes
Art as part of the building No Partial No
Public Art Development Dedication No Partial Partial
Variety of Plant Types Partial Yes Yes
Site and Landscape Design
Building DesignBuilding Form
Building Materials
Sustainability
Public Art
Current Zoning Code Guidelines Proposed Code
Orientation Partial Yes Yes
Articulation Partial Yes Yes
Rooflines/Roofs No Yes Yes
Fenestration Partial Yes Yes
Façade Materials Partial Yes Yes
Door and Window Materials No Yes Yes
Sustainable Sites Partial Yes Partial
Water Efficiency No Yes Partial
Energy and Atmosphere Yes Yes Yes
Materials and Resources No Yes No
Indoor Environmental Quality Partial Yes No
Art within the site No Yes Yes
Art as part of the building No Partial No
Public Art set-aside No No No
Variety of Plant Types Partial Yes Yes
Site and Landscape Design
Building Design
Building Form
Building Materials
Sustainability
Public Art
Sustainable Sites
• Light Pollution Reduction - Code
• Stormwater Design - Quantity and Quality Control - Code (as part of current SWWP)
• Encourage Development Density & Community Connectivity - Guidelines/Incentives
• Protect/Restore Habitat, Maximize Open Space - Guidelines
• Heat Island Effect - Roof and Non-Roof - Guidelines
Water Efficiency
• Water Efficient Landscaping - Guidelines/Incentives through P.U.D.
• Water Use Reduction - Guidelines/Incentives through P.U.D.
(Reduce quantity of landscaping if water efficient)
Energy and Atmosphere
• Commissioning of Building Energy Systems - Building Code
• Minimum Energy Performance - Building Code
• Fundamental Refrigerant Management - Building Code
• Optimize Energy Performance - Guidelines
Materials and Resources
• Storage and Collection of Recyclables
• Construction Waste Management
• Recycled Content - Align with Class 1 Materials
• Regional Materials - Align with Class 1 Materials
• Rapidly Renewable Materials
Indoor Environmental Quality
• Minimum IAQ Performance - Building Code
• Low-Emitting Materials - Guidelines
• Controllability of Systems (Lighting and Thermal Comfort)- Guidelines
• Daylight and Views- Guidelines
Proposed Code Changes
Current Zoning Code Guidelines Proposed Code Orientation Partial Yes YesArticulationPartialYesYesRooflines/Roofs No Yes YesFenestrationPartialYesYesFaçade Materials Partial Yes YesDoor and Window Materials No Yes Yes
Sustainable Sites Partial Yes Partial
Water Efficiency No Yes Partial
Energy and Atmosphere Yes Yes Yes
Materials and Resources No Yes No
Indoor Environmental Quality Partial Yes No
Art within the site No Yes Yes
Art as part of the building No Partial No
Public Art Development Dedication No Partial Partial
Variety of Plant Types Partial Yes Yes
Site and Landscape Design
Building DesignBuilding FormBuilding MaterialsSustainability
Public Art
Screening of Utilities Partial Yes Partial
Parking Lot Islands Yes Yes Yes
Pollinators No Yes Partial
Current Zoning Code Guidelines Proposed Code
Orientation Partial Yes Yes
Articulation Partial Yes Yes
Rooflines/Roofs No Yes Yes
Fenestration Partial Yes Yes
Façade Materials Partial Yes Yes
Door and Window Materials No Yes Yes
Sustainable Sites Partial Yes Partial
Water Efficiency No Yes Partial
Energy and Atmosphere Yes Yes Yes
Materials and Resources No Yes No
Indoor Environmental Quality Partial Yes No
Art within the site No Yes Yes
Art as part of the building No Partial No
Public Art set-aside No No No
Variety of Plant Types Partial Yes Yes
Site and Landscape Design
Building Design
Building Form
Building Materials
Sustainability
Public Art
Site and Landscape Design
• Design a holistic site design that unites landscaping, paving and building - Guidelines
• Encourage designers to view landscaping as an amenity not afterthought - Guidelines
• Design for pedestrian connectivity to surrounding context and within site - Guidelines/Code
Plant Materials
• Use a variety of plant types (trees, shrubs, ground covers, perennials) - Require in Code
• Promote diversity of species - Guidelines
• Use low water consumption plant materials - Guidelines
• Use pollinator friendly plant materials in selected areas where possible - Guidelines/Code
• Use a variety of plant materials with seasonal variety - Guidelines/Code
Screening
• Use Plant Materials to screen at-grade utilities - Code (plants or bldg. matls.)
• Use Plant Materials to screen service and trash areas - Code Bldg. Matls. currently required
• Use Plant Materials to screen vehicles - Code
• Ensure CPTED principles followed - Guidelines
• Supplement screening with decorative fencing or low walls - Guidelines
Parking Lot Landscaping
• Reduce large expanses of paved areas with islands that beautify the site, provide pervi-
ous surface and reduce heat island effects. - Guidelines
• Design for “dual duty” landscapes that serve more than one purpose - Guidelines
• Encourage design of the landscape as an amenity, not an afterthought - Guidelines
• Incorporate pedestrian amenities into the design - Guidelines
• Ensure compatibility with CPTED principles - Guidelines
Proposed Code Changes
Current Zoning Code Guidelines Proposed Code Orientation Partial Yes YesArticulationPartialYesYesRooflines/Roofs No Yes YesFenestrationPartialYesYes
Façade Materials Partial Yes Yes
Door and Window Materials No Yes Yes
Sustainable Sites Partial Yes Partial
Water Efficiency No Yes Partial
Energy and Atmosphere Yes Yes Yes
Materials and Resources No Yes No
Indoor Environmental Quality Partial Yes No
Art within the site No Yes Yes
Art as part of the building No Partial No
Public Art Development Dedication No Partial Partial
Variety of Plant Types Partial Yes Yes
Site and Landscape Design
Building DesignBuilding FormBuilding Materials
Sustainability
Public Art Current Zoning Code Guidelines Proposed Code
Orientation Partial Yes Yes
Articulation Partial Yes Yes
Rooflines/Roofs No Yes Yes
Fenestration Partial Yes Yes
Façade Materials Partial Yes Yes
Door and Window Materials No Yes Yes
Sustainable Sites Partial Yes Partial
Water Efficiency No Yes Partial
Energy and Atmosphere Yes Yes Yes
Materials and Resources No Yes No
Indoor Environmental Quality Partial Yes No
Art within the site No Yes Yes
Art as part of the building No Partial No
Public Art set-aside No No No
Variety of Plant Types Partial Yes Yes
Site and Landscape Design
Building Design
Building Form
Building Materials
Sustainability
Public Art
Public Art Topics
• Art within the site
• Art as part of building exterior
• Public Art Development Dedication
• Sculpture, Lighting, Paving, Fencing - Guidelines
Art within the site
• Windows, Doors, Facade, Roofs - Guidelines
Art as part of building exterior
• Separate program
• Many ways to set up
• Uses private dollars for public art in public Right-of-way
Public Art Development Dedication
Next Steps
- Finalize Design Guidelines
- Finalize Zoning Language Changes
- Public Review and Adoption Process
1
PROJECT PROFILE – SEPTEMBER 12, 2016
PLANNING COMMISSION – SEPTEMBER 12, 2016
CONSERVATION COMMISSION – SEPTEMBER 13, 2016
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION – SEPTEMBER 19, 2016
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – SEPTEMBER 20, 2016
1. CEDAR RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (2016-06) by City of Eden Prairie (ANGIE)
Location: 8905 Braxton Drive
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to Public on 23.19 acres.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review 06/30/16
Notice to Paper Date 07/21/16
Resident Notice Date 07/25/16
Meeting Date 08/08/16
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/16
Resident Notice Date 00/00/16
1st Meeting Date 09/06/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/16
2. OAK POINT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (2016-07) by City of Eden Prairie (ANGIE)
Location: 13400 Staring Lake Parkway
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to Public on 23.05 acres.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review 06/30/16
Notice to Paper Date 07/21/16
Resident Notice Date 07/25/16
Meeting Date 08/08/16
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/16
Resident Notice Date 00/00/16
1st Meeting Date 09/06/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/16
2
3. EDEN LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (2016-08) by City of Eden Prairie (ANGIE)
Location: 12000 Anderson Lake Parkway
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to Public on 23.46 acres.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review 06/30/16
Notice to Paper Date 07/21/16
Resident Notice Date 07/25/16
Meeting Date 08/08/16
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/16
Resident Notice Date 00/00/16
1st Meeting Date 09/06/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/16
4. FOREST HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (2016-09) by City of Eden Prairie (ANGIE)
Location: 13708 Holly Road
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to Public on 28.31 acres.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review 06/30/16
Notice to Paper Date 07/21/16
Resident Notice Date 07/25/16
Meeting Date 08/08/16
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/16
Resident Notice Date 00/00/16
1st Meeting Date 09/06/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/16
5. HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE (2016-10) by City of Eden Prairie (ANGIE)
Location: 13100 College View Drive
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to Public on 104.38 acres.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review 06/30/16
Notice to Paper Date 07/21/16
Resident Notice Date 07/25/16
Meeting Date 08/08/16
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/16
Resident Notice Date 00/00/16
1st Meeting Date 09/06/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/16
1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT by City of Eden Prairie (JULIE)
Amend the Comprehensive Plan relating to development densities and process for medium & high
density residential developments.
PLANNING COMMISSION – SEPTEMBER 26, 2016
3
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING – OCTOBER 4, 2016
1. PRAIRIE BLUFFS SENIOR LIVING (2015-17) by Albert Miller (JULIE/BETH)
Proposal to develop a 3 and 4 story, 138 unit senior housing and assisted living project
Location: 10217, 10220, 10240, 10280 Hennepin Town Road and two additional parcels
(PID 36 -116-22-11-0026 & 36-116-22-11-0003)
Contact: Albert Miller – 612-386-6260
Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Office to High Density
Residential on 4.74 acres.
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.74 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.74 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural and Office to RM-2.5 on 4.74 acres
• Site Plan Review on 4.74 acres
• Preliminary Plat of six lots into one lot and one outlot on 4.74 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 07/13/16
Date Complete 08/02/16
120 Day Deadline 11/30/16
Initial DRC review 07/28/16
Notice to Paper Date 08/04/16
Resident Notice Date 08/05/16
Meeting Date 08/22/16
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
2. CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO LOADING FACILITIES, MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT, SITE LIGHTING AND TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURES (JULIE)
Public hearing to amend City Code Chapter 11, relating to loading facilities, mechanical equipment screening,
site lighting, and architectural requirements for trash and recycling enclosures.
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review N/A
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/15
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 00/00/15
2nd Meeting Date
4
IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED
1. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT (2015-23) by SW Metro Transit Commission
(JULIE)
Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.38 acres
• Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on
11.38 acres
• Site Plan Review on 11.38 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 00/00/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date 11/20/15
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15
Resident Notice Date 12/18/15
1st Meeting Date 01/05/16
2nd Meeting Date
2. MARTIN BLU TRAIL (2015-21) by Eden Prairie Development, LLC (JULIE)
Proposal for relocation of a trail.
Location: 14301 Martin Drive
Contact: Rob Bader, 952-540-8643
Request to:
• Amend Development Agreement to reflect revised trail location within the Martin Blu
project
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/28/15
Date Complete 10/28/15
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review 11/05/15
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date 11/20/15
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15
Resident Notice Date 12/18/15
1st Meeting Date 01/05/16
2nd Meeting Date
5
3. HY-VEE CONVENIENCE STORE (2016-11) by Hy-Vee, Inc. (BETH)
Proposal to construct a 7,905 square foot convenience store with gas pumps and drive thru for a coffee shop
Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of Pioneer Trail and Hennepin Town Road.
Contact: Hy-Vee, Inc. – (515)267-2800, jbrehm@hy-vee.com
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 3.96 acres
• Site Plan Review on 3.96 acres
• Preliminary Plat to combine one lot and one outlot on 3.96 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/26/16
Date Complete 00/00/16
120 Day Deadline 00/00/16
Initial DRC review 09/01/16
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/16
Resident Notice Date 00/00/16
Meeting Date 00/00/16
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/16
Resident Notice Date 00/00/16
1st Meeting Date 00/00/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/16
4. PRESTIGE DAYCARE (2016-12) by Shingobee (ANGIE/JULIE)
Proposal to construct a daycare facility
Location: 15219 Pioneer Trail – Southeast Quadrant of Mitchell/Spring Rd & Pioneer Trl
Contact: Stacy Gleason 763-479-5647, sgleason@shingobee.com
Request for:
• Site Plan Review on 3 acres of un-platted land within the 35 acre parcel
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/26/16
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 09/01/16
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/16
Resident Notice Date 00/00/16
Meeting Date 00/00/16
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/16
Resident Notice Date 00/00/16
1st Meeting Date 00/00/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/16
APPROVED VARIANCES
TELECOMMUNICATION PROJECTS