HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 06/27/2016
AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, June 27, 2016, 7:00 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEMBERS:
John Kirk, Jon Stoltz, Charles Weber, Travis Wuttke, Ann
Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Mark Freiberg, Tom Poul
STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer;
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
III. MINUTES
A. Approval of the Minutes for the May 23, 2016 meeting
IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
V. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. WHITETAIL BLUFF
Location: 10065 Eden Prairie Rd
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.48 acres
• Preliminary Plat of one lot into two lots on 2.48 acres
B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Request to:
• Amend the Comprehensive Plan relating to development densities and process for high
density residential developments
VII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VIII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
ANNOTATED AGENDA
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner
RE: Planning Commission Meeting for Monday, June 27, 2016
___________________________________________________________________________________________
MONDAY, June 27, 2016 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE- ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Move to approve the agenda.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION: Move to approve the Planning Commission minutes:
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY, MAY 9, 2016
V. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. WHITETAIL BLUFF
Location: 10065 Eden Prairie Rd
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.48 acres
• Preliminary Plat of one lot into two lots on 2.48 acres
The project proposes creating two lots from an existing 2.48 acre lot. One lot will include
the existing home and the second lot is being created for a new single-family home. The
property is currently zoned Rural and the applicant is requesting a rezoning to R1-13.5
which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the site. As proposed, both lots meet
the zoning and subdivision standards. No waivers are being requested.
The applicant has identified the steep slope areas on the property and is proposing to
protect them with a conservation easement and a drainage and utility easement.
Staff recommends approval.
MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing.
ANNOTATED AGENDA
June 27, 2016
Page 2
MOTION 1: Move to recommend approval of the Zoning District Change
from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.48 acres and Preliminary Plat of one lot into two
lots on 2.48 acres based on plans stamp dated June 14, 2016 and the
information included in the staff report dated June 22, 2016.
B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Request to:
• Amend the Comprehensive Plan relating to development densities and process for
high density residential developments.
Metropolitan Council staff identified an inconsistency within the text language of the
Comprehensive Plan related to medium and high density residential developments. The
Metropolitan Council has communicated that this inconsistency between policy intent and guiding
densities needs to be corrected prior to review of any comprehensive guide plan map amendment
requests. City staff has had conversations with the Metropolitan Council to determine the
preferred alternative to rectify this inconsistency.
The inconsistency identified exists between the text language in the land use chapter and the
densities provided on the guide plan map. The text of the land use chapter refers to maximum
densities of 6.7 for Medium Density and 17.4 for High Density Residential. These density ranges
are consistent with the density language included in the zoning ordinance for the RM-6.5 and RM-
2.5 zoning districts. However, the maps included in the Comprehensive Plan indicate maximum
densities of 10 units/acre for Medium Density and 40 units/acre for High Density and the housing
chapter includes density ranges extending to 10 and 40 units per acres. When the Metropolitan
Council reviewed the 2009 Comprehensive Plan, it reviewed based on the density ranges provided
in the land use chapter text rather than those indicated on the map or in the housing chapter.
Staff is proposing language to the land use chapter that would allow medium density residential
densities up to 10 units/acre and high density residential densities up to 40 units/acre. Densities
proposed ranging from 6.8 – 10 units/acre in the medium density and 17.5 – 40 in the high density
areas would require the review of a PUD. This proposed language is consistent with the practice
that has been used for previous development projects as noted in the staff report.
Staff recommends approval.
MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing.
MOTION 1: Move to recommend approval of the Amending the
Comprehensive Plan relating to development densities and process for
medium and high density residential developments based on the information
included in the staff report dated June 22, 2016.
ANNOTATED AGENDA
June 27, 2016
Page 3
VIII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
IX. MEMBERS’ REPORT
X. CONTINUING BUSINESS
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Move to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, MAY 23, 2016 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER
Council Chambers
8080 Mitchell Road
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Jon Stoltz, John Kirk, Travis Wuttke, Ann Higgins,
Charles Weber, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Mark
Freiberg, Tom Poul
CITY STAFF: Beth Novak-Krebs, Senior Planner
Rod Rue, City Engineer
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
Julie Krull, Recording Secretary
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Vice Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Stoltz was absent.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Higgins, to approve the agenda. Motion carried 8-0.
III. MINUTES
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MAY 9, 2016
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by Farr, to approve the Planning Commission
Minutes. Motion carried 8-0.
IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
V. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PRAIRIE VIEW ENCLAVE
Location: 12701 Pioneer Trail
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.71 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 10.71 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.71 acres
• Preliminary Plat of 18 lots and 1 outlot on 10.71 acres
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
May 23, 2016
Page 2
Ian Peterson, representing the owner, presented the proposal. He stated they would
like to develop 18 single family units on approximately 10 acres. Mr. Peterson said
there were a few concerns raised from the May 3rd neighborhood meeting. The
concerns were related to traffic and it was requested to look into the possibility of
having additional access from County Highway 1 (Pioneer Trail). Because of this
request, they have been working with Hennepin County and City Staff to discuss
the possibility of full access or right in/right out onto County Highway 1. There
was also a concern regarding storm water. There is an existing easement on site
and they will have a catch basin on site tied to the sewer system; they will have to
remove a portion of the fence and a tree. Mr. Peterson said he reviewed the staff
report and they are in agreement with everything except the continuance.
Farr asked the project proponent is he could show the alternative accesses. Mr.
Peterson utilized the overhead projector to show the extension to Surrey Street, the
right in/right out option off of County Highway 1 and stated if the MAC proposal
would go through this would change to full access on the MAC property with a
connection to this project. Poul asked if there were other impacts to development if
this was continued. Mr. Peterson said yes, it would be a delay in construction
because there is only one council meeting in June.
Vice Chair Pieper asked Novak-Krebs to review the staff report. Novak-Krebs said
this is an 18 lot single family subdivision with 2 cul-de-sacs that provide access.
Both cul-de-sacs are longer than what is allowed by the City so that is why the
proponent is asking for a waiver. On May 17, the proponent gave City Staff a
potential solution for the secondary access point onto County Highway 1. Staff
would like additional time to review this with the County. Staff is recommending a
continuance of the public hearing until June 13, 2016 to allow time for further
discussion and review of this issue.
Kirk asked if this secondary access would be permanent or temporary. Rue said it
would be temporary until things would change with the MAC property.
Farr commented this proposal was submitted in February but not completed until
the end of April, and asked if that was applicant or City error. Novak-Krebs said
there were a number of issues that delayed this proposal. One issue was the field
verification of the wetland delineation, which could not be looked at until the spring
when the snow melted. Traffic issues with the secondary access also delayed this.
Farr asked if there were changes to the design. Mr. Peterson said there were no
changes to the design. He said they had to wait until April 23rd so the wetlands
could be verified. They have continued to work with the storm water issues.
Tonight they would like to be granted approval with the access out of County
Highway 1 to keep the project moving.
Farr asked Staff what choices of actions the Commission has this evening. Novak-
Krebs said it can be moved forward in regards to the secondary access but City
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
May 23, 2016
Page 3
Staff would like a little more time to work with the County and the other option is
that is can be continued. If it is continued, the public hearing can be opened tonight
and left open until the next meeting, which is on June 13th.
Vice Chair Pieper opened the meeting up for public input.
John Fedora, residing at 9820 Tree Farm Road, said traffic in this area is a huge
issue and commented if we can do a right turn in and right turn out that would help
and it should be a permanent solution. In regards to safety zones by the airport, the
topic of the distance of 1,000 from the radar has never been discussed. Also, traffic
should be the main concern with this project and is should be continued so this gets
addressed. Vice Chair Pieper asked staff to address the issue of the safety zones
and distance from the radar. Novak-Krebs said this plan was sent to MAC for
review and comment and they did not say anything about it. She stated she can
specifically ask them about this situation.
Clark Wicklund, civil engineer working on this project, said they made an
application with the FAA, who in turn, will provide review and commentary in
regards to this project.
Padina Bandanpalie, of 9692 Tree Farm Road, stated she has concerns about the
storm water issue because they will be digging 20 to 25 feet by her house. They
will be digging up her property and she would like them to replace the sprinkler and
fence and any other damage they do. Mr. Peterson showed the location of the
sewer connection and where they would be digging. It would impact the fence and
lilac bushes in the area. He said the disturbance will be minimal and they will be
replacing a portion of the fence, sod and the irrigation system.
Kelly Artz, of 9636 Ridgewood Drive, said he had a question about the traffic
counter that was placed in the area and asked what the results were. Rue said a
counter was set up and there were 172 weekday trips anticipated with the 18 lots.
Existing traffic was looked at and with 72 units traffic was counted for two days
with a total county of 804. This was slightly over what was anticipated, which was
around 700. With the additional units, it would be 172 more a day.
Kevin Johnson, of 9672 Ridgewood Drive, said he is concerned about traffic and
safety and pointed out there is a neighborhood to the east that uses the same access
road to avoid the light. He commented, having the additional traffic coming in is a
lot. The right hand turn coming into the development should be a minimum, but a
full access would be best.
Kirk asked in regards to the MAC intersection, can anything happen until that is
developed. Rue confirmed nothing can happen until MAC would like to develop on
the property. Kirk said what would be acceptable to the neighbors is the right in
and right out and confirmed the City needs more time to develop. Rue confirmed
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
May 23, 2016
Page 4
that the City has more work to do on this project and needs more time in order to
present it to the County. Mr. Peterson stated that is not completely accurate. They
have been in contact with the County in regards to the right in and right out. In
regards to access points, Homeward Hills has full access and there are many
additional access points out there. Mr. Peterson pointed out that the County said the
right in right/out option would be best located furthest to the west. He also stated it
seemed unfair that the picture that is painted is there is a lot of work still left to do
and pointed out they were discussing the issues just this morning and the County
was agreeable to the access issue.
Vice Chair Pieper asked if the Commission puts a condition on the right in and right
out, would that impact anything. Rue said it would not impact anything but the City
would like more time to discuss the access issues.
Farr asked the project proponent to show the entire neighborhood on site, including
the four access points already there and asked if they were on the margin and if a
fifth access point is required. Rue said when this project came in months ago; it
was discussed to have a secondary access point. After the neighborhood meeting,
the project proponent was asked to address this. Farr stated he did not want the
applicant to be charged with solving traffic issues in the area. Mr. Peterson said
when they started the project and up until the neighborhood meeting, everyone
knew traffic would be an issue. He stated they are where they are today from the
direction giving by the City since August 3rd of 2015. They have been working on
it and are here tonight seeking approval. The reason they are in a PUD situation is
because of an over length cul-de-sac. They were forced into a PUD because Staff
said there would be no access point to Pioneer Trail.
Kirk commented it had been a good public hearing and the Commission needs to
put a balance between staff, developers and neighbors. What he is hearing from the
neighbors is that they would like a secondary access off of County Highway 1. The
question for the Commission is to continue the project or move it on to City
Council. He point out this is only an advisory decision to Council. Freiberg asked
how long it would be for the County to get back to the City and project proponent in
regards to the secondary access. Rue said they have a meeting every Tuesday but
will need more detail to approve the connection.
Vice Chair Pieper asked Freiberg where he was in regards to approving this project.
Freiberg said he acknowledges the need for a continuance but would like to see
what can be moved on gets moved on to City Council. Farr commented he does not
want to see the secondary access be forced.
Wuttke stated he cannot see the rational for the right in/right out access with all of
the other access points so close to each other and does not think it is reasonable.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
May 23, 2016
Page 5
Higgins stated she is satisfied with the conversation tonight and does not want to
hold up the project but said she wanted the City Council to be aware there may be
an issue with the right in/right out access. Kirk also agreed to move the project
forward and let the City Council know there may be discussions in regards to the
secondary access. Poul said he is in favor of moving forward but is not in favor of
the secondary access.
Novak-Krebs said if the Commission decides to move this project forward to the
City Council, they have conditions for the City Council. Novak-Krebs distributed a
sheet to the Commission listing all of the conditions. Kirk commented it would
have been advantageous to have these conditions prior to the meeting.
MOTION: Farr moved, seconded by Freiberg, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried 8-0.
MOTION: Farr moved, seconded by Poul, to recommend approval of the Zoning
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.71 acres; Planned Unit Development
Concept Review on 10.71 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review with
waivers on 10.71 acres; and Preliminary Plat of 10.71 acres into 18 lots, 1 outlot
and road right of way, based on plans stamped dated April 29th, 2016 and a
recommendation to the City Council that a secondary vehicular access from the
development to Pioneer Trail be provided if feasible and approved by City Staff and
Hennepin County; as well as the 5 conditions itemized in the City Staff’s written
report distributed to the Planning Commission. Motion carried 7-0-1 abstention.
VII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VIII. MEMBERS’ REPORT
IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Wuttke, to adjourn the Planning Commission
meeting. Motion carried 8-0.
Vice Chair Pieper adjourned the meeting at 8:33p.m.
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Beth Novak-Krebs, Senior Planner
DATE: June 22, 2016
SUBJECT: Whitetail Bluff
APPLICANT: Robert Schmitt – Premium Construction LLC
OWNER: Duncan and Lisa Tomassen
LOCATION: 10065 Eden Prairie Road
120 DAY REVIEW: October 11, 2016
REQUEST: • Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.48 acres
• Preliminary Plat of 2.48 acres into two lots
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING
The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows the proposed site guided Low Density Residential allowing
a density of up to 2.5 units per acre. The property is zoned Rural. The project proponent is
requesting a rezoning to R1-13.5. The plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The surrounding properties are guided for Rural, Low Density Residential, Medium Density
Residential development and Park/Open Space. The surrounding properties are zoned R1-13.5 to
the north, Rural to the east and south, and Rural and R1-13.5 to the west.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
This project proposes the creation of 2 lots with a gross density of .81 units per acre. Proposed Lot
2 will include the existing single family home and proposed Lot 1 is being created for a new
single-family home. The lot sizes are 40,929 square feet and 67,031 square feet, exceeding the
size requirement of the R1-13.5 zoning district.
GHOST PLAT
The applicant has included a Ghost Plat that shows a potential third lot south of the existing home.
This ghost plat is for informational purposes only and depicts the applicant’s long term plans for
the property. The third lot is not approved with this plat and will require a separate review process.
Staff has not reviewed setbacks, potential building pad locations, utilities, etc. for the potential
third lot. Although it helps illustrate how a third lot may be feasible, the Ghost Plat will not be
included in the officially approved plans for this project.
Staff Report – Whitetail Bluff
June 27, 2016
Page 2
STEEP SLOPES
There are steep slope areas at the back of the property. Steep slopes are slopes of over 12% and
having an elevation difference of 30 feet or more in a given parcel. The proposed plat identifies the
steep slope areas. The proponent is providing a 20 foot wide buffer along the steep slopes. In
order to protect these steep slope areas, the proponent is placing a conservation easement over the
steep slopes and buffer area. The conservation easement is mirrored by a drainage and utility
easement that will be depicted on the plat.
TREE REPLACEMENT & LANDSCAPING
There are 869 diameter inches of significant trees on proposed lot 1. Tree loss is 176 diameter
inches, or 20%. The required tree replacement is 47 caliper inches. The tree replacement plan
includes 57 caliper inches. The tree replacement plan meets code requirements.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
A special assessment agreement is required for the trunk assessments and deferred assessments
will be required to be paid.
UTILITIES
The existing home, located on proposed Lot 2, is served by well and septic. The owners had the
septic system inspected. The inspection report indicates that the septic system is in compliance.
There are sewer and water laterals available to proposed lot 2. The owner of lot 2 will be required
to connect to municipal sewer and water when the septic system is determined to be noncompliant.
Proposed Lot 1 will be served by municipal sewer and water. There are sewer and water laterals
stubbed to the property line. The specific details of the sewer and water service will be reviewed
when a building permit is issued for Lot 1 and at the time that sewer and water is extended to the
existing home.
WATER QUALITY
When the owner of proposed Lot 1 applies for a land alteration permit, detailed stormwater and
erosion control plans will be required at that time. A wetland study was conducted on the property.
The determination was made that the area in the northwest corner of the site is just a seasonally
flooded basin or flat. This was confirmed by the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of the following request:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.48 acres
• Preliminary Plat of 2.48 acres into 2 lots and road right of way
Staff Report – Whitetail Bluff
June 27, 2016
Page 3
This is based on plans stamp dated June 14, 2016, the Staff Report dated June 22, 2016 and the
following conditions:
1. Prior to the public hearing at City Council, the proponent shall:
A. Show the proposed Right of Way for Eden Prairie Road extending to the centerline of
the 66’ of roadway easement on the preliminary plat.
B. Include a drainage and utility easement mirroring the conservation easement and show
it on the plans.
C. Provide additional detail regarding the septic system location on the plan set. The septic
system shall not be located within the conservation/drainage and utility easement.
2. Prior to release of the final plat, the proponent shall:
A. Sign special assessment agreement for City trunk sewer and water assessment fees.
B. Pay deferred assessments.
C. Consider the option of connecting Lot 2 to the municipal water service in place. The
existing well location falls within a few feet of the proposed property line between Lots
1 and 2. This may create an issue with the Department of Health regarding well
location requirements. The applicant should contact the Department of Health regarding
well location requirements. If the owner of Lot 2 connects to water and abandons the
well, it should be shown on the plans.
3. Prior to land alteration permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and
approval by the City Engineer.
B. Submit a tree replacement bond, letter of credit, or escrow surety equivalent to 150% of
the cost of the landscaping.
C. Obtain and provide documentation of Watershed District approval.
D. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading.
E. Install erosion control at the grading limits of the property for review and approval by
the City.
F. Utilize and implement Best Management Practices in conjunction with construction of
the home. Management of the stormwater generated from the driveway and home will
need to be managed so that erosion of the slopes does not occur.
G. Locate the driveway for Lot 1 outside of the 10 foot drainage and utility easement along
the north property line.
4. Prior to building permit issuance for the property, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fees.
B. Provide recorded copies of any Home Owner Association documents or private
covenants and agreements to the City following recording of the final plat.
SITE
Frederick Place
Eden Prairie Road
Reeder Ridge
Flying Cloud Drive
Wutke Crossing
¯
Area Location Map - Whitetail Bluff
Site Address: 10065 Eden Prairie Road, Eden Prairie, MN
0 250 500125 Feet
SITE
Frederick Place
Reeder Ridge
Eden Prairie Road
Flying Cloud Drive
Streams
Principal Arterial
A Minor Arterial
B Minor Arterial
Major Collector
Minor Collector
City of Eden Prairie Land Use GuidePlan Map 2000-2030
¯
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctness
of the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,
including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information it
contains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.
M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialGuidePlan.mxd
Map was Updated/Created: April 18, 2008
DATE Revised 02-23-06
DATE Approved 03-19-03
DATE Revised 01-07-05
DATE Revised 11-07-05
DATE Revised 03-23-06
DATE Revised 06-23-06
DATE Revised 12-06-06
DATE Revised 03-01-07
DATE Revised 06-01-07
DATE Revised 10-01-07
DATE Revised 03-01-08
DATE Revised 03-01-09
Guide Plan Map - Whitetail Bluff10065 Eden Prairie Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre
Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre
Low Density/Public/Open Space
Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre
Medium Density Residential/Office
High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre
Airport
Office
Office/Industrial
Office/Public/Open Space
Industrial
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
Regional Commercial
Town Center
Park/Open Space
Public/Quasi-Public
Golf Course
Church/ Cemetary
Open Water
Right-Of-Way
CityLimits 290 0 290145 Feet
SITE
Frederick Place
Eden Prairie Road
Reeder Ridge
Flying Cloud Drive
QR61
QR4EDEN PRAIRIE RDR E E D ERRIDGEFREDERICK PLFLYING CLOUD
D
R SPRING RDCity of Eden Prairie Zoning Map
In case of discrepency related to a zoning classification on this zoning map, the Ordinance
and attached legal description on file at Eden Prairie City Center will prevail.
¯
Shoreland Management Classifications
100 - Year Floodplain
Natural Environment Waters
Recreational Development Waters
General Development Waters (Creeks Only)GD
NE
RD
Up dated through approved Ordinances #26-2008
Ordinance #33-2001 (BFI Addition) approved, but not shown on this map edition
Date: March 1, 2009
0 0.10.05
Miles
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctness
of the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,
including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information it
contains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.
Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialZoning.mxd
Map was Updated/Created: June 11, 2008
Zoning Map - Whitetail Bluff10065 Eden Prairie RoadEden Prairie, MN 55347
Rural
R1-44 One Family- 44,000 sf. min.
R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min.
R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min.
R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min.
RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A. max.
RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A. max.
Office
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
Highway Commercial
Regional Service Commercial
Regional Commercial
TC-C
TC-R
TC-MU
Industrial Park - 2 Acre Min,
Industrial Park - 5 Acre Min.
General Industrial - 5 Acre Min.
Public
Golf Course
Water
Right of Way
SITE
Frederick Place
Eden Prairie Road
Reeder Ridge
Flying Cloud Drive
QR61 EDEN PRAIRIE RDFREDERICK PLREEDERRIDGEFLYING CLOUD
D
R
¯
Aerial Map: Whitetail BluffAddress: 10065 Eden Prairie RoadEden Prairie, Minnesota 55347
0 225 450112.5 Feet
STAFF REPORT:
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner
DATE: June 22, 2016
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment – Medium & High Density Residential
BACKGROUND:
The Comprehensive Plan adopted in 2009 includes the following language regarding Medium
and High Density Residential development in Section 3.2 of the Land Use Chapter.
Medium Density Residential: This category allows a gross residential density between 2.5 and
6.7 dwelling units per acre. Typical development includes single family detached dwellings, in
addition to multiple family attached dwelling units that are approved either through
conventional platting or a planned unit development. Corresponding zoning districts include the
R1-9.5 and the RM-6.5 (multi-family) district.
High Density Residential: This category allows a gross residential density between 6.7 and
17.4 units per acre. Typical development includes multiple family attached dwelling units that
are approved either through conventional platting or a planned unit development. The
corresponding zoning district is the RM-2.5 district.
The City has received an application requesting approvals of; Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment to reguide property from Low Density Residential and Office to High Density
Residential; and Planned Unit Development (PUD) requesting a waiver to exceed the 17.4 units
per acre allowed in the RM-2.5 zoning district for the Eden Prairie Senior Living project that
includes assisted living and memory care units, as well as, independent senior housing.
In preliminary review of the guide plan amendment request, staff has reached out to
Metropolitan Council staff to review the proposed map amendment. The Metropolitan Council
considers assisted living and memory care units as housing units and applies those numbers
towards the City’s overall density calculations. As a part of those discussions, Metropolitan
Council staff identified an inconsistency within the text language of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Metropolitan Council has communicated that this inconsistency between policy intent and
guiding densities needs to be corrected prior to review of any comprehensive guide plan map
amendment requests.
The inconsistency identified exists between the text language in the land use chapter and the
densities provided on the guide plan map. The text of the land use chapter refers to maximum
densities of 6.7 for Medium Density and 17.4 for High Density Residential. These density
ranges are consistent with the density language included in the zoning ordinance for the RM-6.5
and RM-2.5 zoning districts. However, the map included in the Comprehensive Plan indicate
maximum densities of 10 units/acre for Medium Density and 40 units/acre for High Density and
the housing chapter includes density ranges extending to 10 and 40 units per acres. When the
Metropolitan Council reviewed the 2009 Comprehensive Plan, it reviewed based on the density
ranges provided in the land use chapter text rather than those indicated on the map or in the
housing chapter.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
City staff has had conversations with the Metropolitan Council to determine the preferred
alternative to rectify this inconsistency. Staff proposes the following changes underlined and as
noted below:
Medium Density Residential: This category allows a gross residential density between 2.5
and 6.7 10 dwelling units per acre. Typical development includes single family detached
dwellings, in addition to multiple family attached dwelling units that are approved either through
conventional platting or a planned unit development. Corresponding zoning districts include the
R1-9.5 and the RM-6.5 (multi-family) district. Development densities ranging from 6.8 to 10
units per acres may be limited to projects that are reviewed through the planned unit
development process, and which are consistent with and further other policies of the
comprehensive plans, such as addressing housing needs.
High Density Residential: This category allows a gross residential density between 6.7
and 17.4 40 units per acre. Typical development includes multiple family attached dwelling
units that are approved either through conventional platting or a planned unit development. The
corresponding zoning district is the RM-2.5 district. Development densities ranging from 17.5 to
40 units per acres may be limited to projects that are reviewed through the planned unit
development process, and which are consistent with and further other policies of the
comprehensive plans, such as addressing housing needs.
The approach of applying a PUD for those projects that exceed the density requirements of the
underlying zoning district is consistent with the practice that has been utilized in past
development projects such as Summit Place, Presbyterian Homes, Martin Blu, Lincoln Parc, and
Water Tower.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan as noted in the staff
report.
1
PROJECT PROFILE – JUNE 27, 2016
PLANNING COMMISSION – JUNE 27, 2016
1. WHITETAIL BLUFF (2016-05) by Premium Construction LLC (BETH)
Proposal for a two lot single family subdivision
Location: 10065 Eden Prairie Rd
Contact: Robert Schmidt – 612-760-9461
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.48 acres
• Preliminary Plat of one lot into two lots on 2.48 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/13/16
Date Complete 00/00/16
120 Day Deadline 00/00/16
Initial DRC review 00/00/16
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/16
Resident Notice Date 00/00/16
Meeting Date 00/00/16
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
2. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT by City of Eden Prairie (JULIE)
Amend the Comprehensive Plan relating to development densities and process for high density
residential developments.
PLANNING COMMISSION – JULY 11, 2016
1. CODE AMENDMENT by City of Eden Prairie (JULIE)
Amend the City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.35 to add schools as a permitted use in the Public
Zoning District.
CONSERVATION COMMISSION – JULY 12, 2016
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION – JULY 18, 2016
2
CITY COUNCIL OLD BUSINESS – JULY 19, 2016
1. EDEN PRAIRIE CENTER LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS (2015-12) by Eden Prairie
Center (JULIE)
Proposal for landscaping improvements
Location: 8251 Flying Cloud Drive
Contact: Nancy Litwin, 952-525-2152
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review on 35.32 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 07/02/15
Date Complete 10/06/15
120 Day Deadline 09/01/16
Initial DRC review 07/09/15
Notice to Paper Date 10/22/15
Resident Notice Date 10/23/15
Meeting Date 11/09/15
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date 11/20/15
1st Meeting Date 12/07/15
2nd Meeting Date
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – JULY 19, 2016
1. PRAIRIE VIEW ENCLAVE (2016-03) by Dave Weekley Homes-Minnesota. (JULIE/BETH)
Proposal for 18 lot single family subdivision
Location: 12701 Pioneer Trail
Contact: Ian Peterson 612-260-2303
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.71 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 10.71 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.71 acres
• Preliminary Plat of 18 lots and 1 outlot on 10.71 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 02/12/16
Date Complete 04/22/16
120 Day Deadline 08/19/16
Initial DRC review 00/00/00
Notice to Paper Date 05/05/16
Resident Notice Date 05/16/16
Meeting Date 05/23/16
Notice to Paper Date 05/25/16
Resident Notice Date 05/26/16
1st Meeting Date 06/14/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/00
3
2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS File#2016-08L Lease by Sprint (c/o – John Deecher - Pyramid) –
Contact John Deecher Office# 315-796-4481 (STEVE)
(Approved 00-00-16) Review time ?? Days. Incomplete as of 00-00-16
Location: 8950 Eden Prairie Road, Eden Prairie, MN
Request: Re-establishment of Lease. Property zoned Public.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 03/11/16
Date Complete 00/00/16
90 Day Deadline 06/09/16
Initial DRC review 03/17/16
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date N.A
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 00/00/16
2nd Meeting Date N/A
3. DRAFT TOD ORDINANCE (JULIE)
Adoption of the draft TOD ordinance.
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review N/A
Notice to Paper Date 6-24-15
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 7-13-15
Notice to Paper Date 8-6-15
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 8-18-15
2nd Meeting Date
4. CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO LOADING FACILITIES, MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT, SITE LIGHTING AND TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURES (JULIE)
Public hearing to amend City Code Chapter 11, relating to loading facilities, mechanical equipment screening,
site lighting, and architectural requirements for trash and recycling enclosures.
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review N/A
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/15
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 00/00/15
2nd Meeting Date
4
5. HAMPTON INN (2015-15) by Cities Edge Architects (JULIE)
Proposal to develop a 5 story, 105 guest room Hampton Inn
Location: 11825 Technology Drive
Contact: Kevin Hanson – 320-235-7775
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 1.7 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 1.7 acres
• Zoning District Change from Commercial Regional Service (Com-Reg-Ser) to Town
Center Commercial (TC-C)
• Site Plan Review on 1.7 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/12/15
Date Complete 11/12/15
120 Day Deadline 10/07/16
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
Meeting Date 03/14/16
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
6. MARTIN BLU TRAIL (2015-21) by Eden Prairie Development, LLC (JULIE)
Proposal for Dos Manitas Daycare (Jardin) to construct a trail.
Location: 14200 Martin Drive and 14301 Martin Drive
Contact: Rob Bader, 952-540-8643
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 0.97 acres
• Site Plan Review on 0.97 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/28/15
Date Complete 10/28/15
120 Day Deadline 06/23/16
Initial DRC review 11/05/15
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date 11/20/15
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15
Resident Notice Date 12/18/15
1st Meeting Date 01/05/16
2nd Meeting Date
PLANNING COMMISSION – JULY 25, 2016
5
IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED
1. TACO BELL (2016-01) by Border Foods, Inc. (BETH)
Proposal for façade remodel, improved landscaping, and a building addition
Location: 8450 Joiner Way
Contact: B Schneider, 763-489-2970
Request for:
• Site Plan Review on .54 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 01/29/16
Date Complete 00/00/00
120 Day Deadline 00/00/00
Initial DRC review 00/00/00
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/00
Resident Notice Date 00/00/00
Meeting Date 00/00/00
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/00
Resident Notice Date 00/00/00
1st Meeting Date 00/00/00
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/00
2. CHICK-FIL-A (2016-02) by Oppidan Investment Company (JULIE)
Proposal for free standing restaurant with drive thru
Location: 8460 Franlo Road
Contact: Drew Johnson, 952-540-4180
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to Reg-Com-Serv on 2.58 acres
• Preliminary Plat of 3 lots into 2 lots on 2.58 acres
• Site Plan Review on 2.58 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 02/12/16
Date Complete 00/00/00
120 Day Deadline 00/00/00
Initial DRC review 00/00/00
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/00
Resident Notice Date 00/00/00
Meeting Date 00/00/00
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/00
Resident Notice Date 00/00/00
1st Meeting Date 00/00/00
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/00
6
3. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT (2015-23) by SW Metro Transit Commission
(JULIE)
Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.38 acres
• Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on
11.38 acres
• Site Plan Review on 11.38 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 00/00/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date 11/20/15
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15
Resident Notice Date 12/18/15
1st Meeting Date 01/05/16
2nd Meeting Date
4. EDEN PRAIRIE SENIOR LIVING (2015-17) by Kaas Wilson Architects (JULIE)
Proposal to develop a 3 story, 116 unit senior housing and assisted living project
Location: 10220, 10240 & 10280 Hennepin Town Road
Contact: Link Wilson – 612-879-6000
Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Office to High Density
Residential on 3.11 acres.
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 3.11 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 3.11 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural and Office to RM-2.5 on 3.11 acres
• Site Plan Review on 3.11 acres
• Preliminary Plat of five lots into one lot and one outlot on 3.11 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/11/15
Date Complete 11/13/15
120 Day Deadline Open ended
extension
recd from
applicant
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date 11/20/15
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
APPROVED VARIANCES
7
TELECOMMUNICATION PROJECTS
1. TELECOMMUNICATIONS File#2015-18TM by T-Mobile (c/o – Rob Viera – Buell Consulting) – Contact
Rob Viera #612-801-2228. (STEVE)
(Approved 00-00-15) Review time ? days. Complete as of 00-00-15
Location: 6752 Shady Oak Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Request: Construction of new Telecommunication Tower. Administrative review. Property zoned I-2,
PID#01-116-22-43-0008
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 12/03/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
90 Day Deadline 03/02/16
150 Day Deadline 05/01/16
Initial DRC review 12/10/15
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date N.A
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A
2. File#2016-10TROW by Verizon Wireless (c/o – Jared Andrews - Jacobs Telecommunication) –
Contact – Jared Andrews 952-831-1043 ext. 3103. (STEVE)
(Approved 00-00-15) Review time?Days
Request: Small Cell in City Right of way Adjacent to 9701 Portal Drive – Homward Hills Road.
Placement of small antenna on City Light pole – Complete as of 00-00-15
Location: 9701 Portal Drive in Homeward Hills Right of way, Eden Prairie, MN - MIN JUNIPER
SC1
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/10/16
Date Complete 00/00/16
90 Day Deadline 08/18/16
Initial DRC review 05/16/16
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date N.A
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A
3. File#2016-11TROW by Verizon Wireless (c/o – Jared Andrews - Jacobs Telecommunication) –
Contact – Jared Andrews 952-831-1043 ext. 3103. (STEVE)
(Approved 00-00-15) Review time?Days
Request: Small Cell in City Right of way Adjacent to Mill Creek Towehome entranced. Placement of
small antenna on City Light pole – Complete as of 00-00-15
Location: Mill Creek Townhome Entrance, Eden Prairie, MN – MIN JUNIPER SC2
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/10/16
Date Complete 00/00/16
90 Day Deadline 08/08/16
Initial DRC review 05/16/16
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date N.A
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A
8
4. File#2016-12TROW by Verizon Wireless (c/o – Jared Andrews - Jacobs Telecommunication) –
Contact – Jared Andrews 952-831-1043 ext. 3103. (STEVE)
(Approved 00-00-15) Review time?Days
Request: Small Cell in City Right of way Adjacent to 10783 Spoon Ridge. Placement of small
antenna on City Light pole – Complete as of 00-00-15
Location: 10783 Spoon Ridge, Eden Prairie, MN – MIN JUNIPER SC5
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/10/16
Date Complete 00/00/16
90 Day Deadline 08/08/16
Initial DRC review 05/16/16
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date N.A
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A
5. File#2016-13TROW by Verizon Wireless (c/o – Jared Andrews - Jacobs Telecommunication) –
Contact – Jared Andrews 952-831-1043 ext. 3103. (STEVE)
(Approved 00-00-15) Review time?Days
Request: Small Cell in City Right of way Adjacent to 10088 Juniper Lane. Placement of small
antenna on City Light pole – Complete as of 00-00-15
Location: 10088 Juniper Lane, Eden Prairie, MN – MIN JUNIPER SC2
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/10/16
Date Complete 00/00/16
90 Day Deadline 08/08/16
Initial DRC review 05/16/16
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date N.A
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A