HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 11/09/2015
AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, November 9, 2015, 7:00 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEMBERS:
John Kirk, Jon Stoltz, Charles Weber, Travis Wuttke, Ann
Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr
STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer;
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
III. MINUTES
A. Approval of the Minutes for the October 26, 2015 meeting
IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
V. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. EDEN PRAIRIE CENTER
B. CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO PUD & SITE PLAN REVIEW
VII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
A. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SYSTEM STATEMENT
B. DECEMBER 7, 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
C. COUNCIL WORKSHOP WITH COMMISSIONS JANUARY 19, 2016 - 5:00-6:30 PM
VIII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
A. COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) REPORT
IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
ANNOTATED AGENDA
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner
RE: Planning Commission Meeting for Monday, November 9, 2015
___________________________________________________________________________________________
MONDAY, November 9, 2015 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE- ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Move to approve the agenda.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION: Move to approve the following Planning Commission minutes:
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2015
V. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. EDEN PRAIRIE CENTER by Eden Prairie Center
Location: 8251 Flying Cloud Drive
Request for:
Planned Unit Development District Review on 35.32 acres
The proposed project is for landscaping improvements along the Flying Cloud
corridor primarily at the intersections of Regional Center Road and Singletree Lane.
The applicant is proposing to update the landscaping at key entrances to Eden Prairie
Center.
The current landscaping on site is primarily coniferous and deciduous trees located
between the street and the building. As a part of this plan, the proponent is seeking to
improve the overall look and functionality of the landscaping through the selective
removal of trees that are dead, diseased or in poor condition. Additionally, the plan
proposes to provide a natural looking landscape that adds color and seasonal interest
at entrances to the mall by constructing landscape beds that include prairie grasses
and native and pollinator species.
Staff recommends approval.
ANNOTATED AGENDA
November 9, 2015
Page 2
MOTION 1: Move to recommend a continuance to the November 26, 2015
meeting.
OR
MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing.
MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval of the Planned Unit
Development District Review on 35.32 acres based on the information
included in staff report dated November 6, 2015.
OR
MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing.
MOTION 2: Move to recommend denial of the Planned Unit Development
District Review on 35.32 acres based on the information included in staff
report dated November 6, 2015.
B. CODE AMENDMENT RELATING TO PUD & SITE PLAN REVIEW
At the direction of City Council, Staff is proposing minor text amendments to existing code
sections within Chapter 11 to address a more streamlined process for minor changes to
existing developed properties.
MOTION 1: Move to recommend a continuance to the November 23, 2015
meeting.
OR
MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing.
MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval of the Code Amendment City
Code Chapter 11 relating to Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review
processes based on the information included in staff report dated November
6, 2015.
VIII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
ANNOTATED AGENDA
November 9, 2015
Page 3
A. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SYSTEM STATEMENT
Michael Larson, Metropolitan Council Sector Representative will be attendance to
present information and answer questions regarding the System Statements issued
by the Metropolitan Council.
B. DECEMBER 7, 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
C. COUNCIL WORKSHOP WITH COMMISSIONS- JANUARY 19, 2016 –
5:00-6:30 PM
IX. MEMBERS’ REPORT
A. COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) REPORT
X. CONTINUING BUSINESS
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Move to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2015 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER
Council Chambers
8080 Mitchell Road
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Jon Stoltz, John Kirk, Travis Wuttke, Ann Higgins,
Charles Weber, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr
STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner
Rod Rue, City Engineer
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
Julie Krull, Recording Secretary
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Vice Chair Kirk called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Pieper, Stoltz and Weber were
absent.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION by Higgins, seconded by Farr, to approve the agenda. Motion carried 4-0.
III. MINUTES
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2015
Higgins had a change on page 2, paragraph 1, second sentence. She would like the
words, “do is demo”, replaced with “demolish”.
MOTION by Higgins, seconded by Farr, to approve the amended Planning
Commission Minutes. Motion carried 4-0.
IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
V. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Planning Commission Minutes
October 26, 2015
Page 2
A. CODE AMENDMENT RELATING TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
Klima presented the code amendment and said staff prepared revisions to this code
because it came to staffs attention that subdivision regulations do not address the
combination of properties. Because of that there has been additional clarity with
process and procedures of the Subdivision Chapter. Staff recommendation is for
approval.
Wuttke asked how many property owners of projects this ordinance will affect.
Klima said it is hard to project the number of homeowners that may seek a property
combination. She pointed out it is not a frequent request to combine two parcels
into one parcel and said the proposed language includes the process associated with
subdivision procedures.
Wuttke asked what criteria would be the difference between minor subdivisions and
the administrative review process. Klima said the minor subdivisions could be used
if there were complicating factors or if there was a need for right of way or
easements and they could proceed directly to the City Council.
Vice Chair Kirk said the wording in the new ordinance used “word resolution”.
Klima said historically minor subdivisions have proceeded directly to the City
Council without a public hearing so action has been taken by adoption of a
resolution.
Wuttke said the administrative approval has four criteria; what is the process if
someone adjacent to the process objects. Rue said it would be the perimeter
properties and if we have to vacate easements it would be a public hearing. If there
are no objections it would simply go through the administrative approval. Rue said
if there is something that comes up that needs public input then it would go through
the normal process of the public hearing process.
Wuttke said he is hesitant in separating government parcels of land. Rue said if
MnDOT or the City is separating land, and there are no issues and they are just
giving up the right away, it would be a resolution and go to the City Council for
approval because it is owned by certain government jurisdictions. Vice Chair Kirk
said he does not see a big issue with this because it does have to go through the city
council. Farr said the issue at hand is transparency; there should be a time tested
process for this.
Wuttke said in regards to Section 12.41, we have been discussing the transit
oriented development (TOD) ordinance and asked if there are conflicting messages
between this and the TOD ordinance. Klima said this ordinance only applies with
the subdivision of property on TOD’s. The language in the TOD ordinance is based
on zoning.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 26, 2015
Page 3
Farr asked for clarification on accuracies of surveys in Subd. 1. In the paragraph it
states at one point, “accurate survey” and further down just states “survey”. Klima
said The term accurate in in place to account for surveys that might be reproduced
and are no longer scalable.
Farr had a question on differences between 15 feet to 100 feet at intersections. Rue
said this is in regards to radius when entering a cul-de-sac.
Farr asked in Subd. 4 on page 12-12, why does it state 100 feet in both sentences in
regards to the radius. Rue said that is incorrect; it should not be 100 feet radius but
should be 15 feet in one instance.
Vice Chair Kirk opened the meeting up for public input. There was no input.
MOTION by Wuttke, seconded by Farr, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried 4-0.
MOTION by Wuttke, seconded by Farr, to recommend approval of the Code
Amendment City Code Chapter 12 relating to subdivision regulations based on the
information included in staff report dated October 23, 2015. Motion carried 4-0
VII. PLANNERS’ REPORT
Klima said the Planning Commission Meeting on December 14th has been moved to
December 7th. The second meeting in December will also be cancelled due to the
holidays.
VIII. MEMBERS’ REPORT
A. COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE –LIGHT RAIL
No Members’ Report
IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS
No continuing business.
X. NEW BUSINESS
No new business.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION by Wuttke, seconded by Higgins, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting.
Motion carried 4-0.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 26, 2015
Page 4
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:41 p.m.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner
DATE: November 6, 2015
PROJECT: Eden Prairie Center Landscape Improvements
LOCATION: 8251 Flying Cloud Drive
APPLICANT: CAPREF Eden Prairie LLC
OWNERS: CAPREF Eden Prairie LLC
120 DAY REVIEW: Expires February 3, 2016
REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 35.32
acres
BACKGROUND
The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows the 35.32 acre property for Regional Commercial land
use. Surrounding land uses are guided Regional Commercial, Community Commercial, Town
Center and Office. The property is zoned Commercial Regional.
SITE PLAN
The proposed project is for landscaping improvements. The applicant is proposing to update the
landscaping at key entrances to Eden Prairie Center. The current landscaping has become
overgrown and unhealthy, requiring further attention to promote improved aesthetics and
resiliency.
The current landscaping on site is primarily coniferous and deciduous trees located between the
street and the building. The landscaping has become dated and overgrown. As a part of this
plan, the proponent is seeking to improve the overall look and functionality of the landscaping as
proposed on the attached plans. The proposed plan includes the selective removal of trees that
are dead, diseased or in poor condition. Additionally, the plan proposes to provide a natural
looking landscape that adds color and seasonal interest at entrances to the mall by constructing
landscape beds that include prairie grasses and native and pollinator species. The applicant
asserts that the improvements will improve security, sight lines and visibility while maintaining
screening of the parking lots. Please see the attached rendering of the existing and proposed
conditions, as well as, the cross section of the proposed view to the mall façade.
The proposed landscaping improvements are located along the Flying Cloud corridor primarily at
Staff Report – Eden Prairie Center Landscaping
November 6, 2015
Page 2
the intersections of Regional Center Road and Singletree Lane. The proposed plan exceeds the
tree replacement requirements identified in City Code.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommend approval of the following request:
1. Planned Unit Development District Review on 35.32 acres
This is based on plans stamp dated October 6, 2015 and the following conditions:
1) Prior to issuance of the land alteration permit issuance for the property, the proponent shall:
a) Provide plans compliant with the City’s Land Alteration, Tree Preservation, and
Stormwater Management Regulations.
b) Provide a tree replacement/landscaping surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the
landscaping plan for review and approval.
Prairie Center Drive
Flying Cloud Drive
Eden Prairie Center Site
QR61
QR61
QR61 PRAIRIE CENTER DRW 78TH ST
PRESERVE BLVDPRAIRIE CENTER DRPRESERVE BLVDEDEN RDGLENLNDEN RDLEONA RD
FRANLORDROLLINGHILLS RD
CARRIAGE C T
REGIONAL CENTERRD
MI
D
D
L
E
S
E
T
R
D
W 78TH
S
T
PRESWICK BLVDWILDER DR
TOWNSEND
D
R
JOIN E R W A Y
SHANNON CT
P
R
O
VI
DENCELN
S
T
RATTONAVE
CARDIFFLNLEXINGTON DRM IN U TEM A N
ALCOVEFLYING CLOUD DRFLYING CLOUD DR¯
Area Location Map - Eden Prairie Center (2015-12)
Site Address:8251 Flyng Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
0 560 1,120280 Feet
V IEWRDPRAIRIE CENTER DREDENR D
CENTERWAYPRAIRIELA
K
E
S
D
R
FRANLORDHYLANDTERDEN RDM
E
D
C
O
M
BLVD EDENPRAIRIECTRSINGLETREE LN GLENLNCRY STALREGIONALCENTER RD
MID
D
L
E
S
E
T
R
D
WAYJOINER PRESWICKBLVDSTKINSLEYTO
WNSE
ND
DR
F
ORGERDV
ALLEYANNAPOLIS
WAYLABO NT
WA
Y
R O L L I N GSTRA
TTONAVE
H ILLSRDPROVIDENCE
LN
LEXINGTON DR
CARRIAGE CT
WILD E R D R
TI F FANYSHANNON
MINUTE
MA
N ALC
Eden Prairie Center Site
Prairie Center Drive
Flying Cloud Drive
Streams
Principal Arterial
A Minor Arterial
B Minor Arterial
Major Collector
Minor Collector
City of Eden Prairie Land Use GuidePlan Map 2000-2020
¯
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctness
of the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracy
of this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,
including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business information
or other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information it
contains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.
Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.
M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialGuidePlan.mxd
Map was Updated/Created: April 18, 2008
DATE Revised 02-23-06
DATE Approved 03-19-03
DATE Revised 01-07-05
DATE Revised 11-07-05
DATE Revised 03-23-06
DATE Revised 06-23-06
DATE Revised 12-06-06
DATE Revised 03-01-07
DATE Revised 06-01-07
DATE Revised 10-01-07
DATE Revised 03-01-08
DATE Revised 03-01-09
Guide Plan Map - Eden Prairie Center 2015-128251 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre
Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre
Low Density/Public/Open Space
Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre
Medium Density Residential/Office
High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre
Airport
Office
Office/Industrial
Office/Public/Open Space
Industrial
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
Regional Commercial
Town Center
Park/Open Space
Public/Quasi-Public
Golf Course
Church/ Cemetary
Open Water
Right-Of-Way 590 0 590295 Feet
V IEWRDPRAIRIE CENTER DREDENR D
CENTERWAYPRAIRIELA
K
E
S
D
R
FRANLORDDEN RDM
E
D
C
O
M
BLVD EDENPRAIRIECTRSINGLETREE LN GLENLNCRY STALREGIONALCENTER RD
MID
D
L
E
S
E
T
R
D
WAYJOINER PRESWICKBLVDSTKINSLEYTO
WNSEND
DR
F
ORGERDV
ALLEYLABO NT
WA
Y
R O L L I N GSTRA
TTONAVE
H ILLSRDPROVIDENCE
LN
LEXINGTON DR
CARRIAGE CT
TI F FANYSHANNON
MINUTE
MA
N ALC
Prairie Center Drive
Flying Cloud Drive
Eden Prairie Center Site
City of Eden Prairie Zoning Map
In case of discrepency related to a zoning classification on this zoning map, the Ordinance
and attached legal description on file at Eden Prairie City Center will prevail.
¯
Shoreland Management Classifications
100 - Year Floodplain
Natural Environment Waters
Recreational Development Waters
General Development Waters (Creeks Only)GD
NE
RD
Up dated through approved Ordinances #26-2008
Ordinance #33-2001 (BFI Addition) approved, but not shown on this map edition
Date: March 1, 2009
0 0.20.1
Miles
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctness
of the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracy
of this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,
including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business information
or other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information it
contains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.
Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.
M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialZoning.mxd
Map was Updated/Created: June 11, 2008
Zoning Map - Eden Prairie Center 2015-128251 Flying Cloud DriveEden Prairie, MN 55344
Rural
R1-44 One Family- 44,000 sf. min.
R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min.
R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min.
R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min.
RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A. max.
RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A. max.
Office
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
Highway Commercial
Regional Service Commercial
Regional Commercial
TC-C
TC-R
TC-MU
Industrial Park - 2 Acre Min,
Industrial Park - 5 Acre Min.
General Industrial - 5 Acre Min.
Public
Golf Course
Water
Right of Way
Green = Site boundaries
V IEWRDLEE WA
R
DPRAIRIE CENTER DRTECHNOLOGY DR
EDENR D
CENTERWAYPRAIRIELA
K
E
S
D
R
FRANLORDLEONA RD
HYLANDTERDEN RDDA
R
N
E
L
R
D
N
O
RTHMARK D R
FIELDCR
E
S
TRDWINDROW DR
M
E
D
C
O
M
BLVD
RIDGEWIN
D
R
D
JOY
C
I
R EDENPRAIRIECTRCASTLEMO OR
PORCUPIN
E
CTK
ATHRYNCTCASTL E M O O RDRSINGLETREE LN GLENLNC RYSTALC O M M O N WEALTHDR
REGIONAL
C
ENTER RD
MID
D
L
E
S
E
T
R
D
WAYJOINER PRESWICKBLVDSTKINSLEYTOWN
SENDDR
K IA WA H D R
LEAPING DE
E
RLNF
ORGERDV
ALLEYANNAPOLIS
WAYLABO NT
WA
Y
RO L L I N GSTRA
TTONAVE
H ILLSRDLANEWOOD CIR
PROVIDENCE
LN
LEXINGTON DR
DEER PATHZACHMAN CIRCIR
CARRIAGE CT
WESTWIND CIRW
I
NWARDCIRGWENETHLNWILD E R D R
TI F FANYSHANNON
CARDIF F L N
GR
IER LN
SCOTCH PINE CT
MINUTE
MA
N ALC
Eden Prairie Center Site
¯
Aerial Map - Eden Prairie Centerl 2015-12
Address: 8251 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
0 860 1,720430 Feet
STAFF REPORT:
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Regina Dean, Senior Planner
DATE: November 6, 2015
SUBJECT: Code Change – PUD and Site Plan Review
BACKGROUND
At the direction of City Council, Staff is proposing minor text amendments to existing code
sections within Chapter 11 to address a more streamlined process for minor changes to existing
developed properties.
Stakeholders have expressed a preference for city code language that offers transition,
compromise and flexibility if and when they go through the development review process. This
was highlighted through the creation of the draft Transit Oriented Development zoning ordinance
and has been expressed for development within other areas of the City.
Proposed development within the TOD will be subject to a Site Plan and Architectural Design
Review and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Process which is consistent with existing
development requirements city wide.
CODE CHANGE
Please see the attached redlined version of Chapter 11 for the proposed changes to the PUD and
Site Plan Review sections.
Site Plan Review
According to City Code, the City Planner may determine that an alteration or enlargement of a
building or structure is minor and can be reviewed administratively for Site Plan Review,
however a threshold for administrative review is not provided. All projects not considered minor
are required to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council which can typically
take a minimum of 90 to 120 days.
Staff is proposing criteria that would provide a threshold for administrative review and allow
certain changes such as reconfiguring parking or changing landscape species to be approved
administratively as long as Code requirements are met. Minor amendments including building
additions up 2,000 square feet or 10% of building area, whichever is less could be approved
directly by the City Council even if waivers might be involved. Major changes would continue
to require both Planning Commission and City Council review.
PUD Review
Currently, all PUD amendments which require waivers are required to be reviewed by Planning
Commission and City Council. A threshold for level of review is not established.
Similar to the proposed Site Plan Review criteria, minor amendments including building
additions up 2,000 square feet or 10% of building area, whichever is less could be approved
directly by the City Council even if waivers might be involved. Major changes would continue
to require both Planning Commission and City Council review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the amendments to Chapter 11 as represented in the November 6,
2015 staff report and the draft ordinance.
Section 11.03
Subd. 6. Site Plan and Architectural Design Review.
A. Approval Required. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any (i) building or structure
situated or to be constructed within any District, except, (a) those within the Rural District or One-Family
Residential Districts, and (b) duplexes (dwellings designed for or occupied by two families), or (ii) building
or structure constituting a public infrastructure, situated or to be constructed within any District, including
but not limited to Rural and One-Family Residential Districts, unless it shall conform to a Site Plan and
Architectural Design as described in C. hereof, or an amendment thereof, which has been approved by the
Council and such approval is effective as hereinafter provided.
No building permit shall be issued for the construction of an alteration or enlargement, or ofreduction of a
(i) building or structure situated within any District, except, (a) those within the Rural District or One-
Family Residential Districts, and (b) duplexes (dwellings designed for or occupied by two families), or (ii)
building or structure constituting a public infrastructure, including but not limited to Rural and One-Family
Residential Districts, unless it shall conform to a Site Plan and Architectural Design as described in C.
hereof, or an amendment thereof, which has been approved by the Council and such approval is effective as
herein after provided.
The approval of a Site Plan and Architectural Design shall be effective for a period of two years from the
date first approved by the Council, provided however, the Council may within the two year period (or any
extension thereof as hereinafter provided) extend the two year period for an additional period or periods of
two years each.
Source: Ordinance No. 25-89
Effective Date: 8-17-89
Source: Ordinance No. 1-89
Effective Date: 3-9-89
B. Exceptions. The provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to the issuance of a building permit for (a) a
building or structure to be built or constructed on land in conformity with a Site Plan approved prior to
February 21, 1989, but not more than two years prior to issuance of the building permit by the City Council
in connection with the rezoning or platting of the land, or (b) the building or alteration of an antenna or
tower except an antenna or tower which is greater than eighty (80) feet in height.
The City Planner may determine that an alteration or enlargement of a building or structure is minor and
does not require conformance with an approved Site Plan and Architectural Design or an amendment
thereof, provided however, if the Director shall not make such a determination an owner of the land on
which the building or structure intended to be altered or enlarged is situated may request the Council to
make such determination.
Source: Ordinance No. 27-97
Effective Date: 6-13-97
Source: Ordinance No. 1-89
Effective Date: 3-9-89
C. The terms "Site Plan and Architectural Design" as used in this subdivision mean a plan produced in written,
graphic and/or pictorial form prepared by a registered architect, landscape architect or engineer which shall
include the following: (1) a detailed natural systems analysis which documents existing physical features
such as vegetation, soil types, slopes, hydrologic systems, wildlife, and ecology, (2) proposed construction
of all site alterations including grading, drainage, utilities, and storm sewer, (3) building locations, (4)
landscaping and screening, (5) lighting, (6) plans for all pylon, monument, and building signs, (7) an
architectural plan of the exterior of the building or structure intended to be constructed, altered, or enlarged
situated on the site depicting the building elevation, including its height from the surface of the ground in
its altered or finished condition; its width and depth, its location in relation to the land on which it is
situated, and its external appearance such as materials, texture and color, and (8) such other information as
may reasonably be required by the City.
D. The owner of property for which approval of a Site Plan and Architectural Design is required by this
subdivision may apply for Site Plan and Architectural Design review and approval by filing an application
with the City Planner on the form provided by the City Planner and containing the information required by
such form accompanied by a Site Plan and Architectural Design, together with such further information as
may reasonably be required by the City Planner.
The City Planner shall determine the level of review required for an amendment, alteration, enlargement or
reduction of a building, structure or parking area based on the following criteria:
1. The following amendments to an approved site plan shall be reviewed by the Staff
Development Review Committee and approved by the City Planner:
A. Reduction of parking which meets City Code requirements for size, number and
aisle width. Reconfiguration of parking meeting City Code requirements for size,
number and aisle width.
B. Changes to landscaping type and species that do not fall below the site
requirements.
2. The following Minor amendments to an approved site plan shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Council:
A. Additions or reductions which are code compliant or require PUD waivers (as
described in section 11.40) and are 10% or less of the Gross Floor Area of a building
or 2,000 square feet whichever is less. The addition or reduction shall be the
cumulative total and/or cumulative reduction after adoption of this ordinance.
B. Additions which require PUD waivers (as described in section 11.40) and are 10%
or less of the Gross Floor Area of a building or 2,000 square feet whichever is less.
C. Façade remodels which are code compliant or require a PUD waiver.
3. All other amendments, alterations, enlargements, or reduction of a building, structure or
parking area are considered Major and subject to full review.
4. A Zoning Certificate and Certificate of Occupancy shall be required according to City Code
Section 11.77.
E. A Site Plan and Architectural Design may be evaluated by the Council according to its compliance with the
following standards and provisions:
1. Adherence to, and consistency with, the City's policies and objectives as reflected in the
Comprehensive Guide Plan;
2. Adherence to, and consistency with, the City's Code relating to zoning and the subdivision of land.
3. The preservation and enhancement of the natural and built environment as well as those
modifications already effected by development and construction upon the land, including the
minimization of: tree loss, soil removal, wetland, floodplain, lake and creek encroachment; and the
maintenance of the general natural topography or physical grade of the land consistent with that of
adjoining properties.
4. Maintenance of open space to provide a desirable environment both for occupants of the site and
the general public.
5. Transitions where there are differences in land use, building mass, height, densities, and site
intensity, in proximity to that which is the subject of the Site Plan and Architectural Design.
Transitions may be accomplished by increased setbacks, berming, plantings, larger lot sizes, lower
densities, lower flood area ratios, and smaller buildings.
6. Provision for safe and convenient vehicle and pedestrian traffic, including interior drives and
parking arrangements which facilitate clear access to public streets, appropriate widths for drives
and access points, and the separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic.
7. The minimization of negative impacts upon other land uses of surface water run-off, noise, glare,
odors, vibrations, dust, loading areas, parking areas, and refuse areas.
8. Compatibility of materials, textures, colors, and other construction details with other structures
and uses in the vicinity.
9. Such other conditions and criteria as are reasonably related to the health, safety and welfare of the
residents of the City and to preservation of the environment.
Source: Ordinance No. 1-89
Effective Date: 3-9-89
10. Preservation of Heritage Preservation Sites as designated by the Council pursuant to Section 11.05
and adherence to, and consistency with, the City's policies and objectives as reflected in the
Heritage Preservation Site Program.
Source: Ordinance No. 38-90
Effective Date: 12-7-90
F. The Site Plan and Architectural Design for construction and major amendments shall not be acted upon by
the Council until it has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission or until sixty (60) days
have elapsed from the date it has been referred to the Planning Commission for its study and report.
The Site Plan and Architectural Design for minor amendments shall be acted upon by the Council only.
No approval for construction, minor amendment or major amendments shall be given until a public hearing
has been held thereon by the Council. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be
published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days before the day of the hearing. A notice
shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the day of the hearing to each owner of property situated
wholly or partly within five hundred (500) feet of the property to which the requested approval relates. For
the purpose of giving mailed notice, any appropriate records to determine the names and addresses of
owners may be used. A copy of the notice and list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was
sent shall be attested to by the person giving the notice and shall be made a part of the records of the
proceeding. The failure to give mailed notice to the property owners or defects in the notice shall not
invalidate the proceeding provided a bonafide attempt to comply with this provision has been made.
Approval of the Council shall require a two-thirds vote of all the members of the Council.
Source: Ordinance No. 27-97
Effective Date: 6-13-97
Source: Ordinance No. 1-89
Effective Date: 3-9-89
SECTION 11.40. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) CONCEPT.
Subd. 1. PUD Concept Review. Any person or persons who may apply for a PUD may request a concept review
("PUD Concept Review") with respect to land which may be subject to a PUD. The purpose of a PUD Concept
Review is to afford such persons an opportunity, without incurring substantial expense, to have the general
feasibility of a PUD proposal considered. PUD Concept Review shall consist generally of an informal consideration
by the Planning Commission and the Council of such person's PUD proposal. PUD Concept Review may be held
with a public hearing. An application of PUD Concept Review may provide such information with respect to the
request as the applicant shall deem appropriate in consultation with the City Planner. An applicant for PUD Concept
Review shall pay all fees and costs provided for in this Chapter. Upon conclusion of a PUD Concept Review the
Planning Commission and Council may make such recommendations and comments and take such action with
respect to the proposal as they deem appropriate, provided, however, no approval under this Section shall constitute,
or in the future require, approval or formal establishment or designation of a PUD, zoning or subdivision by the
Council of the land which is the subject of the PUD Concept Review.
Subd. 2. Definition. As used in this Section, the term "original district" means a zoning district described in this
Chapter.
Subd. 3. Zoning District Supplement. Planned Unit Development District ("PUD") is supplementary to a zoning
district within or encompassing all or a portion or portions of one or more original districts in accordance with the
provisions of this Chapter.
Subd. 4. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to: (1) Encourage a more creative and efficient approach to the
use of land in the City; (2) Allow variety in the types of environment available to the people of the City; (3)
Encourage more efficient allocation and maintenance of privately controlled common open space through the
distribution of overall density of population and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable and
feasible; and, (4) Provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than is provided
under the strict application of the provisions of this Chapter and Chapter 12 (relating to subdivisions) of this Code
while at the same time preserving the health, safety, order, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare of the City
and its inhabitants.
Subd. 5. Designation. All PUD's shall be designated in the legal description of the original district being
supplemented.
Source: City Code
Effective Date: 9-17-82
Subd. 6. Repealed. Source: Ordinance No. 3-2000
Effective Date: 1-27-2000
Subd. 7. Permitted Uses. The permitted uses set forth in this Chapter pertaining to the original district or districts
within a PUD shall apply to and be permitted uses in that part of a PUD in which such a district is encompassed,
except as such use or uses may be limited by a development plan, an agreement or imposed by the City as a
condition to approval of the PUD.
Subd. 8. Zoning and Subdivision Standards and Requirements. All standards and provisions relating to an
original district as set forth in this Chapter and to the subdivision of land as set forth in Chapter 12 (if land which is
the subject of
a PUD is or will be subdivided in connection with a PUD) shall apply to an original district situated within a PUD
and to such land subdivided or to be subdivided unless any such standards or requirement has been modified or
waived as provided in Subparagraph A and B hereof.
A. Any standard or provision, except permitted uses, set forth in this Chapter relating to an original district
may be waived or modified by the City provided the ordinance relating to such PUD sets forth specifically
or by reference to a development plan or an agreement such modification or waiver.
B. Any standard or provision set forth in Chapter 12 relating to the subdivision of land which is the subject of
a PUD and is being or will be subdivided in connection with a PUD may be waived or modified as
provided in Chapter 12.
Subd. 9. Application. An applicant for a PUD shall submit in the application all of the material required by this
Chapter for rezoning and if land encompassed within the PUD is to be subdivided, all of the material required by
Chapter 12 of this Code relating to the subdivision of land. In addition, an applicant shall submit the following
information:
A. Project Identification. The following and such other information as is necessary to clearly and completely
describe the project shall be provided:
1. Ownership. Identify all owners legal and equitable of and all encumbrances and easements upon
the land within the proposed PUD.
2. Developer. Identify all parties involved in the development, including their previous experience
and the nature and extent of their participation.
3. Financing of Project. Identify the source and type of financing of the project, including financing
such
as: Municipal Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Housing Revenue Bonds, or otherwise.
4. Development Method. Describe what will be done with the project, if approved, and who will do
it. Will the property be marketed undeveloped; rough graded; developed; or will the developer
carry the project through actual construction of structures? Will structures be retained, sold, or
leased?
5. Development Timing. Specify timing of each stage of development from initial site development
through building construction. Any phasing of different portions of the project should be clearly
explained.
6. Critical Public Decisions. Identify all governmental agencies which have review authority over
any portion of the development, what aspect of the project required their review, and what
approvals are necessary. Explain what public improvements would be necessary to serve the
project, such as: utilities, roads, road improvements, parks, schools, etc.
7. Other Information. Include any other information necessary to explain the unique characteristics
of the project.
B. Plan Area Identification. Provide the following to identify the land included in the proposed PUD.
1. PUD Boundaries. A plan clearly denoting overall project boundaries.
2. PUD Area. A plan which shows the overall PUD area as well as all parcels and their ownership
within 1000 feet of the PUD.
3. Regional Relationships. A description of regional factors the plan is predicated upon such as:
market area, population centers, major roads, railroad, airport, proximity to Regional Services, etc.
Also describe any impact the PUD would have on Regional Services and Systems.
4. Existing Land Use and Occupancy.
5. Existing Transportation Systems. Describe how the land within the PUD will be served by
transportation systems and provide an analysis of the PUD's impact upon such transportation
systems. If transportation systems are not adequate to accommodate the traffic expected from the
development, describe improvements necessary. Illustrate how the plan provides for pedestrian
and bicycle sidewalks and trails and how they tie into the City-wide system.
6. Existing Zoning. A map which shows the existing zoning and zoning of adjacent parcels. A
listing of any zoning district changes or variances from City Code provisions should be provided.
7. Guide Plan and PUD Concept Framework. A map which shows the Guide Plan Designation of the
project and surrounding uses. If the plan was originally part of a PUD Concept Review, the plan
reviewed should be submitted together with a comparative analysis of the proposed PUD.
8. General Analysis and Conclusions.
C. Plan Area Analysis. Provide the following relating to analysis of the plan:
1. Two -foot contour topographic map depicting existing and proposed contours should be submitted
at a scale of 1" = 100'.
2. A soils map depicting surface and subsurface conditions that may affect construction.
3. A map depicting vegetation of the site with detailed locations of trees 12" or over in diameter.
4. All water, streams, lakes, marsh, ponds, drainage, subsurface, flood plains, should be denoted on a
site plan.
5. Photographs of the site sufficient to convey its general visual qualities and relationship to area and
proposed development.
6. A general discussion of natural ecological factors, analysis and conclusions.
7. A utility plan which illustrates the easements, and general sewer, water, and power services to all
uses.
8. Preliminary architectural drawings depicting normal detail achieved during "design development
phase" of architectural design process (does not include single family detached housing).
9. Legal instruments for plan implementation including homeowner's association documents, scenic,
pathway, drainage, or other easements and private documents, etc.
10. Housing or land/building use profile including computations of gross/leasable square footage,
housing unit breakdown to square foot, bedrooms, persons/unit, parking requirements, etc.
11. A map drawn to scale of 1” = 200’ showing roads, structures, lakes, streams, ponds, wetlands,
floodplains, vegetation, topography, utilities, sidewalks, trails, parks, zoning, and land use within
1,000 feet of the boundaries of a proposed PUD and an analysis of the impact the PUD would
have on the above referenced items.
D. Fees and Costs. Applications for a PUD shall be filed at the office of the City Planner. A non-refundable
application fee in the amount established by the Council by resolution to defray administrative costs shall
accompany each application. A deposit established by the City Planner shall accompany the application.
The deposit or a portion thereof, will be refunded after final Council action on the proposal if the total sum
is greater than the administrative review cost, which may include, but not be limited to:
1. Consultant fees assisting in City review.
2. City Staff time expended in specific development review.
3. Mailing, legal notices and other administrative costs.
4. Any other reasonable costs incurred by the City in review of the proposal. Full payment by the
proponent of all fees and costs for City review must be made prior to consideration of the
application.
Subd. 10. Public Hearing. A public hearing on an application for a PUD shall be held before both the Planning
Commission and the Council. A notice of the time, place, and purpose of each hearing shall be published in the
official newspaper at least ten days prior to the day of the hearing. When a PUD involves changes in district
boundaries, a similar notice shall be mailed at least ten days before the day of the hearing to each owner of affected
property and property situated wholly or partly within 500 feet of the property to which the PUD relates. For the
purpose of giving mailed notice, the person responsible for mailing the notice may use any appropriate records to
determine the names and addresses of owners. A copy of the notice and a list of the owners and addresses to which
the notice was sent shall be attested to by the responsible person and shall be made a part of the records of the
proceedings. The failure to give mailed notice to individual property owners, or defects in the notice shall not
invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona fide attempt to comply with this Subdivision has been made.
A. An application for a PUD or Major PUD Amendment may not be acted upon by the Council until it has
received the recommendation of the Planning Commission or until 60 days have elapsed from the date of
referral to the Planning Commission.
B. In the event land within a PUD is or will be subdivided in connection with a PUD, such subdivision
pursuant to, or any waiver or modification of any provision of, Chapter 12 may be approved only upon
compliance with such additional procedures as are set forth in Chapter 12.
Source: City Code
Effective Date: 9-17-82
C. The following Minor PUD amendments shall be reviewed and acted upon by the City Council only:
1. Additions or reductions which are code compliant or require PUD waivers and are
10% or less of the Gross Floor Area of a building or 2,000 square feet whichever is
less. The addition or reduction shall be the cumulative total or cumulative reduction
after adoption of this ordinance.
2. Additions which require PUD waivers and are 10% or less of the Gross Floor Area
of a building or 2,000 square feet whichever is less.
3. Façade remodels which are code compliant or require a PUD waiver.
D. A Zoning Certificate and Certificate of Occupancy shall be required according to City Code Section 11.77.
Subd. 11 Findings Required. The findings necessary for approval of a PUD shall be as follows:
A. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City.
B. The proposed development is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment
within its own boundaries.
C. Any exceptions to the standard requirements of this Chapter and Chapter 12 of this Code are justified by
the design of the development.
D. The PUD is of composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as
a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit, and the PUD shall be consistent with an
approved PUD Concept.
Source: Ordinance No. 24-91
Effective Date: 12-5-91
Subd. 12. Revisions and Amendments.
A. Minor changes in the location, placement and height of buildings or structures as well as other matters set
forth in the development plan, or any agreement, except as described in Subparagraph B below, may be
authorized by the City Planner if required by engineering or other circumstances not foreseen at the time
the final development plan was approved.
B. Changes in uses as well as any modification or waiver of any standard or requirement relating to an original
district or amendment of any waiver or modification thereof granted in connection with a PUD may be
made only in accordance with the procedures applicable to amendments of this Chapter pertaining to
zoning. Changes relating to any standard or requirement set forth in Chapter 12 pertaining to the
subdivision of land or amendment of any waiver or modification thereof granted in connection with a PUD
may be made only in accordance with the procedures provided in Chapter 12 of this Code pertaining to
subdivision of land.
Source: City Code
Effective Date: 9-17-82
PROJECT PROFILE – NOVEMBER 9, 2015
PLANNING COMMISSION – NOVEMBER 9, 2015
1. EDEN PRAIRIE CENTER (2015-12) by Eden Prairie Center (JULIE)
Proposal for landscaping improvements
Location: 8251 Flying Cloud Drive
Contact: Nancy Litwin, 952-525-2152
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review on 35.32 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 07/02/15
Date Complete
120 Day Deadline
Initial DRC review 07/09/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
Meeting Date
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
2. CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO PUD & SITE PLAN REVIEW (REGINA)
Public hearing to amend City Code chapter 11 relating to Planned Unit Development and Site Plan
Review processes.
Contact: Regina Dean, 952-949-8490
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review N/A
Notice to Paper Date 6-24-15
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 7-13-15
Notice to Paper Date 8-6-15
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 8-18-15
2nd Meeting Date
CONSERVATION COMMISSION – NOVEMBER 10, 2015
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION – NOV. 16, 2015
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING – NOVEMBER 17, 2015
1. DORENKEMPER SITE NOMINATION – PUBLIC HEARING
Public hearing for local site nomination of the Dorenkemper House.
Location: 9180 Riley Lake Road
Contact: Lori Creamer, 952-949-8481
1
2. CODE AMENDMENT RELATING TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
Public hearing to amend City Code Chapter 12, relating to the regulation of subdivisions of property.
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted
Date Complete
120 Day Deadline
Initial DRC review
Notice to Paper Date 10/8/15
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date
Notice to Paper Date 10/29/15
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 11/17/15
2nd Meeting Date
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – NOVEMBER 17, 2015
1. EDEN PRAIRIE RETAIL (2015-10) by EP Equities, LLC (JULIE)
Proposal for construction of a single story retail building
Location: 590 Prairie Center Drive
Contact: Hector Vinas, 954-499-8663 x231
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 0.8 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 0.8 acres
• Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial-Regional-Services District on
0.8 acres
• Site Plan Review on 0.8 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 06/19/15
Date Complete 07/24/15
120 Day Deadline 11/22/15
Initial DRC review 06/25/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
Meeting Date 09/14/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date 10/06/15
2nd Meeting Date
2. MILLER REZONING (2015-16) by David and Karen Miller (TANIA)
Proposal to rezone property from Rural to R1-13.5
Location: 7555 192nd Ave W
Contact: David Miller– 952-934-3305
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/02//15
Date Complete 09/02/15
120 Day Deadline 01/07/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
Meeting Date
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
2
3. EDEN PRAIRIE PLAZA (SALON CONCEPTS) (2015-03) by SCEPRE, LLC. (TANIA)
Proposal for adding 58 additional parking spaces
Location: 8040 Glen Lane
Contact: Brent Van Lieu, 513-200-4261
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review on 3.03 acres
• Zoning District Review on 3.03 acres
• Site Plan Review on 3.03 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 01/16/15
Date Complete 03/02/15
120 Day Deadline 12/15/15
Initial DRC review 01/22/15
Notice to Paper Date 4/9/15
Resident Notice Date 4/11/15
Meeting Date 4/27/15
Notice to Paper Date 4/30/15
Resident Notice Date 5/1/15
1st Meeting Date 5/19/15
2nd Meeting Date
4. DRAFT TOD ORDINANCE (REGINA)
Public hearing to adopt the draft TOD ordinance.
Contact: Regina Dean, 952-949-8490
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review N/A
Notice to Paper Date 6-24-15
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 7-13-15
Notice to Paper Date 8-6-15
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 8-18-15
2nd Meeting Date
5. File#2015-09TM by Verizon Wireless (c/o – Amy Dresch Jacobs Telecommunication) –
Contact – Amy Dresch 612-802-0452Mobile. Reviewed by Steve Durham
Request: First Amendment to Telecommunication License Agreement. Exchange amended
construction plan. – Complete as of 00-00-15
Location: 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN
Application Info (2015-05TM) Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted N/A
Date Complete 00-00-15
90 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC
review
N/A
Notice to Paper
Date
N/A
Resident Notice
Date
N/A
Meeting Date N.A
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 11-17-15
2nd Meeting Date N/A
3
PLANNING COMMISSION – NOVEMBER 23, 2015
1. CODE AMENDMENT ARCHITECTURAL & CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
(JULIE)
Planners report to discuss potential amendments to City Code Chapter 11 relating to architecture and
construction materials.
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – DECEMBER 1, 2015
1. SHOPS AT SOUTHWEST STATION (2015-06) by Venture Pass Partners, LLC.
(REGINA)
Proposal for the redevelopment of the existing Santorini’s restaurant site into an 11,138 sf multi-
tenant retail center
Location: 13000 Technology Drive
Contact: Randy Rauwerdink 612-801-4313
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 1.67 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers and Zoning District
Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service zoning district on 1.67
acres
• Site Plan Review on 1.67 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/08/15
Date Complete 05/08/15
120 Day Deadline 12/31/15
Initial DRC review
Notice to Paper Date 6/4/15
Resident Notice Date 6/5/15
Meeting Date 6/22/15
Notice to Paper Date 7/2/15
Resident Notice Date 7/2/15
1st Meeting Date 7/14/15
2nd Meeting Date
PLANNING COMMISSION – DECEMBER 7, 2015
4
IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED
1. HAMPTON INN (2015-15) by Cities Edge Architects (JULIE)
Proposal to develop a 5 story, 105 guest room Hampton Inn
Location: 11825 Technology Drive
Contact: Kevin Hanson – 320-235-7775
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 1.7 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 1.7 acres
• Zoning District Change from Commercial Regional Service (Com-Reg-Ser) to
Town Center Commercial (TC-C)
• Site Plan Review on 1.7 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/12/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
Meeting Date
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
2. EDEN PRAIRIE SENIOR LIVING (2015-17) by Kaas Wilson Architects (REGINA)
Proposal to develop a 3 story, 120 unit senior housing and assisted living project
Location: 10220, 10240 & 10280 Hennepin Town Road
Contact: Link Wilson – 612-879-6000
Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Office to High Density
Residential on 3.11 acres.
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 3.11 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 3.11 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural and Office to RM-2.5 on 3.11 acres
• Site Plan Review on 3.11 acres
• Preliminary Plat of five lots into one lot on 3.11 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/11/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
Meeting Date
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
5
3. KAL POINT (2015-18) by KAL STAY, LLC (JULIE)
Proposal to develop a 17,000 square foot one story standalone building of new retail space
Location: 13105, 13075 & 13045 Pioneer Trail
Contact: KAL STAY LLC – 952-905-9309
Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to Community Commercial
on 2.98 acres.
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.98 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.98 acres
• Zoning District Change from N-COM to C-COM on 2.98 acres
• Site Plan Review on 2.98 acres
• Preliminary Plat of three lots into one lot on 2.98 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/25/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
Meeting Date
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
4. TIMBER LAKES 2ND ADDITION (2015-19) by PennyMac Loan Services (TANIA)
Proposal to revoke the Final Plat Timber Lakes 2nd Addition
Location: 8008-8011 Island Road
Contact: Michael Sauer– 651-209-3307
Request for:
• Revoke the Final Plat Timber Lakes 2nd Addition
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/15/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
Meeting Date
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
6
5. OPTUM PUD AMENDMENT(2015-20) by United Health Group (JULIE)
Proposal to construct surface parking
Location: 13625 Technology Drive
Contact: Dave Pelner – 952-936-1659
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers and Zoning District
Amendment within the I-5 zoning district on 89.63 acres
• Site Plan Review on 89.63 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/29/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
Meeting Date
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
6. MARTIN BLU TRAIL (2015-21) by Eden Prairie Development, LLC (REGINA)
Proposal to amend the Development Agreement for Mitchell Crossing 2012 (Martin Blu) and
amend the site plan and Development Agreement for Dos Manitas Daycare (Jardin) to construct
a trail.
Location: 14200 Martin Drive and 14301 Martin Drive
Contact: Rob Bader, 952-540-8643
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 0.97 acres
• Site Plan Review on 0.97 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/28/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
Meeting Date
Notice to Paper Date
Resident Notice Date
1st Meeting Date
2nd Meeting Date
APPROVED VARIANCES
7
TELECOMMUNICATION PROJECTS
1. TELECOMMUNICATIONS File#2014-18TM by Verizon (c/o – Justin Holt – Jacob,) –
Contact – Justin Holt 952.831.1043 x3102 office, 773.454.9428 mobile
(Approved 00-00-14) Review time? Days
Request: Small Cell Site (Pilot Project Installation of smaller antennas and associated equipment
on Utility poles, traffic lights etc. in right of way.) – Incomplete as of 00-00-14
Location: Right of Way – Pioneer Trail between Homeward Hills Road and Hwy #169
Application Info (2014-19TM) Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 00/00/14
Date Complete 00/00/14
120 Day Deadline
Initial DRC review
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date N.A
Notice to Paper Date N/A
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A
8