HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/15/2012 AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP & OPEN PODIUM
TUESDAY,MAY 15, 2012 CITY CENTER
5:00—6:25 PM, HERITAGE ROOMS
6:30 —7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBER
CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad Aho, Sherry Butcher
Wickstrom, Kathy Nelson, and Ron Case
CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Police Chief Rob Reynolds, Fire Chief George
Esbensen, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah,
Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, Communications Manager Joyce Lorenz, City
Attorney Ric Rosow, and Recorder Lorene McWaters
Workshop-Heritage Room II
I. FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION UPDATE
II. FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT SITES
Open Podium - Council Chamber
II. OPEN PODIUM
III. ADJOURNMENT
AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY,MAY 15, 2012 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad Aho, Sherry Butcher
Wickstrom, Kathy Nelson, and Ron Case
CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, City Planner
Michael Franzen, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation
Director Jay Lotthammer, City Attorney Ric Rosow and Council Recorder Jan Curielli
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/COLOR GUARD
III. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION
IV. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS
A. 2011 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR)
V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
VI. MINUTES
A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2012
B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2012
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION UPDATE
VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
B. FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL-PARCEL SUBDIVISION by Allied Waste Second
Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 on 12.4 acres.
Location: 9813 Flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change)
C. HENNEPIN VILLAGE—SITE B by Toll Brothers; Second Reading of the
Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 71.5
acres and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 24.37 acres. Location:
71.5 acres east of Eden Prairie Road& south and west of Riley Creek. (Ordinance
for PUD District Review with waivers and Zoning District Change)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
May 15, 2012
Page 2
D. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF EDEN
PRAIRIE WOODS
E. ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RENEWAL OF THE HENNEPIN
COUNTY RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING GRANT APPLICATION FOR 2012
THROUGH 2015
F. APPROVE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT
OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES PREVENTION
AND MANAGEMENT
G. APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WENCK
ASSOCIATES FOR THE PHASE III POND INVENTORY PROGRAM
H. AWARD 2012 SEALCOAT PROJECT TO PEARSON BROTHERS, INC.
I. AWARD 2012 BITUMINOUS OVERLAY PROJECT TO GMH ASPHALT
CORPORATION
J. APPROVE SEH PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN ANALYSIS AND PREPARATION
OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STABILIZATION AND
RESTORATION OF EROSION WITHIN LOWER RILEY CREEK
K. AWARD THE CONTRACT TO REPLACE RINK 2 ROOF AT COMMUNITY
CENTER TO PETERSON BROTHERS ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION
L. APPROVE DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT
M. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 2007-94, 2007-
95 AND 2007-96 FOR OAK CREEK AT HENNEPIN VILLAGE 6TH
ADDITION
N. ADOPT RESOLUTION RESCINDING APPROVALS FOR THE MEADOWS 2012
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
A. PRAIRIE OAKS CORPORATE CENTER by CSM Corp. Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 8.4 acres, Planned Unit
District Review with waivers on 8.4 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the I-5
Zoning District on 8.4 acres and Site Plan Review on 8.4 acres. Location: 6455
Flying Cloud Drive. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review)
X. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
XI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING CITY CODE SECTION
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
May 15, 2012
Page 3
5.75 RELATING TO ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND
ENFORCEMENT
XII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
XIII. APPOINTMENTS
XIV. REPORTS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
1. Budget Advisory Commission Report on City Council Compensation
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
C. REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
1. Resolution accepting grant from the Eden Prairie Community
Foundation for AV Equipment at the Senior Center
2. Resolution accepting Hennepin Youth Sports Program Grant for a
John Deere Utility Vehicle for the Miller Park Softball Complex
E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF
G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF
H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
XV. OTHER BUSINESS
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
ANNOTATED AGENDA
DATE: May 11, 2012
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Rick Getschow, City Manager
RE: City Council Meeting for Tuesday, May 15, 2012
TUESDAY, MAY 15, 2012 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBER
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. OPEN PODIUM INVITATION
Open Podium is an opportunity for Eden Prairie residents to address the City Council on
issues related to Eden Prairie city government before each Council meeting, typically the first
and third Tuesday of each month, from 6:30 to 6:55 p.m. in the Council Chamber. If you
wish to speak at Open Podium, please contact the City Manager's office at 952.949.8412 by
noon of the meeting date with your name,phone number and subject matter. If time permits
after scheduled speakers are finished, the Mayor will open the floor to unscheduled speakers.
Open Podium is not recorded or televised. If you have questions about Open Podium, please
contact the City Manager's Office.
IV. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS
A. 2011 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR)
Synopsis: Minnesota statutes require that by June 30 of each year,the City prepare a
financial report for activities of the previous year. This accounting report will be
forwarded to the State by that deadline. Preparation of the report is largely the work of
the Finance Division. The report is prepared with review by the independent auditing
firm of Kern,Dewenter,Viere,Ltd. Kern,Dewenter,Viere,Ltd issued an unqualified
opinion which is the highest level of opinion the City can receive and means the auditor
believe the financial statements are fairly presented in all material respects.
Steve Wischmann,Partner in the accounting firm will make a presentation of the financial
report.
MOTION: Move to accept the 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report (CAFR).
V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MOTION: Move to approve the agenda.
VI. MINUTES
MOTION: Move to approve the following City Council minutes:
ANNOTATED AGENDA
May 15, 2012
Page 2
A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2012
B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2012
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION UPDATE
Synopsis: A member of the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission will present
the annual report.
MOTION: Move to receive the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory
Commission 2011 Report and approve its 2012 Goals and Work Plan.
VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: Move approval of items A-N on the Consent Calendar.
A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
B. FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL-PARCEL SUBDIVISION by Allied Waste Second
Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 on 12.4 acres.
Location: 9813 Flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change)
C. HENNEPIN VILLAGE—SITE B by Toll Brothers; Second Reading of the Ordinance
for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 71.5 acres and Zoning
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 24.37 acres. Location: 71.5 acres east of Eden
Prairie Road& south and west of Riley Creek. (Ordinance for PUD District Review
with waivers and Zoning District Change)
D. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF EDEN
PRAIRIE WOODS
E. ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RENEWAL OF THE HENNEPIN
COUNTY RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING GRANT APPLICATION FOR 2012
THROUGH 2015
F. APPROVE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES FOR AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES PREVENTION AND
MANAGEMENT
G. APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WENCK
ASSOCIATES FOR THE PHASE III POND INVENTORY PROGRAM
H. AWARD 2012 SEALCOAT PROJECT TO PEARSON BROTHERS, INC.
I. AWARD 2012 BITUMINOUS OVERLAY PROJECT TO GMH ASPHALT
CORPORATION
ANNOTATED AGENDA
May 15, 2012
Page 3
J. APPROVE SEH PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN ANALYSIS AND PREPARATION OF
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STABILIZATION AND RESTORATION OF
EROSION WITHIN LOWER RILEY CREEK
K. AWARD THE CONTRACT TO REPLACE RINK 2 ROOF AT COMMUNITY
CENTER TO PETERSON BROTHERS ROOFING& CONSTRUCTION
L. APPROVE DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT
M. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 2007-94, 2007-95
AND 2007-96 FOR OAK CREEK AT HENNEPIN VILLAGE 6TH ADDITION
N. ADOPT RESOLUTION RESCINDING APPROVALS FOR THE MEADOWS 2012
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
A. PRAIRIE OAKS CORPORATE CENTER by CSM Corp. Request for: Planned
Unit Development Concept Amendment on 8.4 acres, Planned Unit District Review
with waivers on 8.4 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the I-5 Zoning District on
8.4 acres and Site Plan Review on 8.4 acres. Location: 6455 Flying Cloud Drive.
(Resolution for PUD Concept Review)
Official notice of this public hearing was published in the May 3, 2012,Eden Prairie
News and sent to 16 property owners.
Synopsis: The plan is to change the interior of the building from 75%to 90 % office
and construct 48 new parking spaces. The I-5 zoning district allows up to 50% office.
In 2000, the property was granted a waiver for 75% office use. The proposed waiver
is from 75%to 90% office use. From 1982 to present, the city has granted 15
variances/PUD waivers from city code to allow for greater than 75% office use within
an industrial zoning district. The proposed plan meets parking requirements based on
90% office use. The 120-Day Review Period Expires on July 25, 2012. The Planning
Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project at the April 23, 2012
meeting.
MOTION: Move to:
• Close the Public Hearing; and
• Adopt the Resolution for Planned Unit Development Concept Review
on 8.4 acres; and
• Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development
District Review with waivers, and Zoning District Amendment within
the 1-5 Zoning District on 8.4 acres; and
• Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Staff
and Commission recommendations and Council conditions.
ANNOTATED AGENDA
May 15, 2012
Page 4
X. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
XI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING CITY CODE SECTION
5.75 RELATING TO ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND
ENFORCEMENT
Synopsis: In 2011 the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) stated that the
Illicit Discharge and Detection Enforcement (IDDE)provisions required in our Phase II
NPDES stormwater permit were not met by our existing city code. The MPCA
requested that the city provide an illicit discharge detection and enforcement ordinance
that specifically references non-stormwater discharges to the city's stormwater system
or risk being seen as not in compliance with our permit. This ordinance was based on a
model ordinance provided by the MPCA.
MOTION: Move to approve First Reading of an Ordinance adding City
Code Section 5.75 relating to illicit discharge detection and enforcement.
XII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
XIII. APPOINTMENTS
XIV. REPORTS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
1. Budget Advisory Commission Report on City Council Compensation
Synopsis: At the request of the City Council, the BAC conducted a review of
Mayoral and Council salary to provide rationale for making any changes. The
BAC reviewed Mayor and Council salary of other cities, the history of salary,
and other information that is included in the report. After an analysis of the
data and discussion among the commission members the BAC report
concluded as follows:
The BAC believes there is adequate data to support a salary increase. In the
future, the BAC recommends blending the technology stipend and salary
components together. Some pros and cons of the potential salary increase
follow:
Pros
• Balance to other cities
• Discontinuance of special meeting pay in 2010
• Adjustment for inflation
Cons
• Difficult economy
• Citizen perception/public opinion
ANNOTATED AGENDA
May 15, 2012
Page 5
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
C. REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
1. Resolution Accepting Grant from the Eden Prairie Community
Foundation for AV Equipment at the Senior Center
Synopsis: The grant in the amount of$3,000 will be used in combination
with matching funds from the Eden Prairie Senior Advisory Council ($2,645),
and a memorial donation in memory of Ruth Dover who was an active
volunteer and regular participant at the Senior Center($700) for a total project
cost of$6,345.
The grant will be used to purchase audio/visual equipment for the Senior
Center. The equipment includes a projector and screen which will be used for
presentations during classes, events, meetings and rentals. The proposed
audio/visual equipment will include a portable projector and screen that can
be used in any room in the building.
MOTION: Move to adopt resolution accepting the grant in the
amount of $3,000 from the Eden Prairie Community Foundation
to be used toward the purchase of new audio/visual equipment;
projector and screen for the Eden Prairie Senior Center.
2. Resolution Accepting Hennepin Youth Sports Program Grant for a John
Deere Utility Vehicle for the Miller Park Softball Complex
Synopsis: The City of Eden Prairie partnered with the Eden Prairie Fastpitch
Softball Association on a sports equipment grant application earlier this spring
for a new utility vehicle which could be used by the Eden Prairie Fastpitch
Association, the City of Eden Prairie and other Eden Prairie Youth Athletic
Associations. The new gator, a John Deer utility vehicle, will be used at the
Miller Park pinwheel complex. It will be used primarily to drag aglime
infields, haul equipment, collect trash and assist with other special event
projects.
This utility vehicle will directly benefit the Eden Prairie Fastpitch Association
league play, clinics, tournaments, including the Eden Prairie High School
Fastpitch teams. This utility vehicle will also benefit other youth athletic
associations, including the Eden Prairie Baseball Association and Eden Prairie
Soccer Club who also use outdoor athletic facilities at Miller Park. In addition,
the utility vehicle can be used for community events such as the 4th of July
Celebration, Safety Camp and the City-wide Open House.
ANNOTATED AGENDA
May 15, 2012
Page 6
MOTION: Move to adopt resolution accepting the $9,500 Sports
Equipment Grant from the Hennepin Youth Sports Program to
purchase a John Deere Utility Vehicle for the Miller Park Softball
Complex.
E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF
G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF
H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
XV. OTHER BUSINESS
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Move to adjourn the City Council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Presentations May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: IV.A.
Sue Kotchevar, Office of the 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial
City Manager/Finance Report(CAFR)
Requested Action
Move to: Accept the 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).
Synopsis
Minnesota statutes require that by June 30 of each year, the City prepare a financial report for
activities of the previous year. This accounting report will be forwarded to the State by that
deadline.
Preparation of the report is largely the work of the Finance Division. The report is prepared with
review by the independent auditing firm of Kern, Dewenter, Viere, Ltd. Kern, Dewenter, Viere, Ltd
issued an unqualified opinion which is the highest level of opinion the City can receive and means the
auditor believe the financial statements are fairly presented in all material respects.
Steve Wischmann,Partner in the accounting firm will make a presentation of the financial report.
Attachments
• 2011 CAFR
• Management Letter
• Special Purpose Audit Report
Yuhtmva•tin n; s
111-4111- 0,
.:
7
a II EDEN
r< 1��� �t ., PRAIRIE
4,,,, , t, V(Al
�n
;ww.'n . LIVE•WOEK•DREAM
L" r.
111111111111111111
^� :� SLY , fi'
r '
- Miller :��
.-- Parktz
.1. 8208 "
1 Eden Prairie Road I O�
SP
EDEN _
�� *'"
i-Il il
J
___ ,p 1 ,
7 .,EDEN
PRAIRIE
a r►c.r,.
ry .
1.
.„,,ii,„.,-;„,„-t..,,,-, ,-,
1 \- d. - t
Si: 1e000me
1•,, ^?,•:may `,
,► _
. i frt,
• ' "� ,. A
,�,,: .
l �.
:Y ,
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
COMPREHENSIVE
ANNUAL
FINANCIAL REPORT
of the
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
MINNESOTA
For The Year Ended December 31, 2011
Rick Getschow, City Manager
Prepared by
THE FINANCE DIVISION
Sue Kotchevar, Chief Financial Officer
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
Table of Contents
Page
Introductory Section
Letter of Transmittal 7
GFOA Certificate of Achievement 16
Organizational Chart 17
List of Principal Officials 18
Financial Section
Independent Auditor's Report 20
Management's Discussion and Analysis 22
Basic Financial Statements
Government-wide Financial Statements
Statement of Net Assets 38
Statement of Activities 39
Fund Financial Statements
Balance Sheet-Governmental Funds 42
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds
to the Statement of Net Assets 44
Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 45
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 47
Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance- Budget and Actual- General Fund 48
Statement of Net Assets- Proprietary Funds 51
Statement of Revenues,Expenses and Changes in Net Assets - Proprietary Funds 52
Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds 53
Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets -Agency Funds 55
Notes to Financial Statements 56
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
Page
Required Supplemental Information
Modified Approach for Infrastructure Assets 94
Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan 95
Combining Fund Statements
Combining Balance Sheet-Nonmajor Governmental Funds 103
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance - Nonmajor Governmental Funds 111
Combining Statement of Net Assets - Internal Service Funds 120
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in
Net Assets - Internal Service Funds 122
Combining Statement of Cash Flows - Internal Service Funds 124
Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets-Agency Funds 129
Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - Agency Funds 130
Statistical Section
Government-wide Net Assets by Category 133
Changes in Net Assets - Total 134
Changes in Net Assets- Governmental Activities 135
Changes in Net Assets- Business-type Activities 136
Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 137
Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 138
Assessed/Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Property 139
Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates 140
Principal Property Taxpayers 141
Property Tax Levies and Collections 142
Legal Debt Margin 143
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 144
Ratios of Total Debt Outstanding by Type 145
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Bonded Debt- General Obligation Bonds 146
Demographic and Economic Statistics 147
Principal Employers 148
Employees by Function 149
Operating Indicators 156
Capital Assets Statistics by Function 157
Introductory
EDEN
PRAIRIE
May 8, 2012 1IVE•woFK•DREArd
To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and the Citizens of the City of Eden
Prairie:
The comprehensive annual financial report of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, for the year
ended December 31, 2011, is hereby submitted. The report was prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) as established
by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board and meets the requirements of the State
Auditor's Office.
The report consists of management's representations concerning the finances of the City.
Consequently management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all
information presented within this report. To provide a reasonable basis for making these
representations, management of the City has established internal controls designed to protect the
City's assets from loss, theft or misuse and to provide sufficient information for the preparation
of these financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Because the cost of internal controls
should not outweigh the benefits, the City's internal controls have been designed to provide
reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements will be free from material
misstatements. As management, we assert that to the best of our knowledge and belief this
financial report is complete and reliable in all material respects.
The City's financial statements have been audited by Kern, DeWenter, Viere, Ltd. Certified
Public Accountants. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable assurance that
the financial statements of the City for the year ended December 31, 2011, are free of material
misstatement. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates used by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Based upon the audit, the independent auditor concluded that there was
reasonable basis for rendering an unqualified opinion that the City's financial statements, for the
year ended December 31, 2011, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The independent
auditors report is present in the financial section of this report.
GAAP requires that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to
accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management's Discussion and Analysis
(MD&A). This letter of transmittal is designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in
conjunction with it. The City's MD&A can be found in the financial section of this report
immediately following the report of the independent auditors.
City Profile
Eden Prairie is a suburban community of 62,900 people located in the southwest corner of
Hennepin County in a setting of rolling hills and picturesque lakes and creeks. Eden Prairie has a
convenient location, a comprehensive system of highways, and is a short distance from
downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul and the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.
Incorporated in 1974 as a City,the City of Eden Prairie operates under a Statutory Plan B form of
government. Policymaking and legislative authorities are vested in the governing council, which
consists of a mayor and a four-member council. The governing council is responsible, among
other things, for passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees and hiring the
government's manager and attorney. The council is elected on a nonpartisan basis. The mayor
and council members are elected to four-year staggered terms. The City Manager is responsible
for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the governing council, for overseeing the day-to-
day operations of the government, and to assign appropriate responsibility and authority to City
staff for the efficient and effective delivery of City services.
The City provides its residents and businesses with a full range of municipal services consisting
of police and fire protection, street maintenance, recreation programs, park maintenance,
community and economic development,building inspections, and a water and sewer utility.
The City is also financially accountable for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA),
which is included in the City's financial statements as a blended component unit. Additional
information on the HRA can be found in Note 1 in the notes to the financial statements.
The biennial budget serves as the foundation for the City's financial planning and control.
Departments submit budget requests to Finance in May and the City Manager presents the
proposed budget to the City Council for review prior to September 15th of each year. Budget
workshops are usually held with the City Council in June or July and in August. The City
Council holds a public meeting on the proposed budget and adopts the final budget in December
each year.
During the first year of the two year budget process, both years' budgets are developed and the
first year's budget is adopted by the council. During the second year of the two year budget
process, budget work is minimized. Staff updates the budget for any significant budget
developments and the council then reviews and adopts the second year budget.
8
The budget is prepared by department and division. The City's directors and division managers
may make transfers of appropriations within a division. Transfers of appropriations between
departments require the approval of the City Manger. Any changes in the total budget must be
approved by the City Council.
Economic Conditions and Outlook
The City of Eden Prairie is located in the southwest corner of the Minneapolis/St. Paul
Metropolitan area. With the update of the comprehensive plan in 2008 and the trend towards
condensed multi-family housing in the downtown area, it is expected that Eden Prairie's
population will grow to 77,100.
Year Population Increase
1960 Census 3,233 134%
1970 Census 6,938 115%
1980 Census 16,263 134%
1990 Census 39,311 142%
2000 Census 54,901 40%
2010 Census 60,797 11%
2011 City Estimate 62,900 3%
As you can see from the table below,the City added new market value in 2011.
$25o $12
Market Value History
:: ' ' i
Si
$8
I
— $6
$100 — 11111 1P1
co
$4
: 711111 ,
$2
3 �
Z I 1 I 1 $o ff
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 0
Em New Market Value Total Market Value
The business environment in Eden Prairie is good especially considering the current United
States and local economy. Eden Prairie's unemployment rate is 4.1% which is less than the State
rate of 5.2% and the US rate of 8.2%. Business continues to invest in Eden Prairie including the
following businesses this past year:
9
• New places to eat include Little Caesars, I-Hop, Five Guys Burgers & Fries, Famous
Dave's, Dickey's BBQ, Panino Brothers, and Smashburger. These companies have all
invested visions,time,and money in the community.
• Some of the larger construction projects and values for the last year include:
o Stratasys Inc converted existing office/warehouse space into manufacturing space,
$6,165,488 valuation.
o United HealthCare remodeled the former ADC/Tyco building, $1,552,500
valuation.
o Eagle Ridge Academy renovated an existing building, $1,702,000 valuation.
o Metropolitan Ford built a new building, $5,050,000 valuation.
o CIGNA revamped four floors of their building, $1,500,000 valuation.
o Milestone Audiovisual did an extensive interior facelift on the former Department
56 building, $5,363,979 valuation.
Also, as you can see from the previous graph, the City's tax base declined from $9.6 billion to
$8.9 billion from 2010 to 2011. The change for 2012 is more moderate with a decrease to $8.7
billion. These changes are due to general market conditions and are not reflective of
circumstances specific to Eden Prairie. For taxes payable in 2013, the tax base is beginning to
moderate with an increase in value for apartments and with commercial property maintaining
values or slightly increasing values.
Light Rail Transit(LRT)
The Southwest Transitway is a proposed high frequency light rail transit line connecting Eden
Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins, St. Louis Park, Minneapolis neighborhoods and the Minneapolis
downtown area. The Hennepin County Regional Railroad has been leading the preparation of
studies and plans for a transitway to serve this growing part of the Metro Area. The Southwest
Transitway will be a 15 mile corridor with 17 stations with five of the stations in Eden Prairie.
Despite the funding challenges, Southwest LRT has passed a crucial test this year when it received
federal approval for preliminary engineering. The next big hurdle is getting through the
Environmental Impact Statement process. The line is expected to be operating in 2018. The
City has planned for transit supportive uses and densities within 1/2 mile of the stations proposed
for the Major Center Area's Town Center and the Golden Triangle Area.
United Health Group
Also, in 2012, the northeast corner of Eden Prairie will be transformed as reconstruction projects
along Shady Oak Road and The United Health Group (UHG) campus start up. The first phase of
the UHG project will include the construction of two eight story buildings and a parking ramp
io
set for completion in 2013. The project will include four new buildings totaling almost 1.5
million square feet of office space on 71 acres. The $240 M redevelopment project will transform
the wooded area just bordering Eden Prairie into a state-of-the-art walkable corporate campus
with space for a light rail transit station.
Presbyterian Homes has a signed development agreement for 70,000 SF of commercial space,447
care center and senior units, and 260 market rate apartments. The exact timing of this project is
not known but should be the next couple of years.
Eden Prairie serves as the corporate headquarters location for many national and international
businesses including CH Robinson World Wide, GE Capital, United Healthcare Services,
numerous multi-tenant office building partnerships, Lifetouch Inc., SuperValu Inc, American
Family Mutual Insurance, MTS systems Corporation, and others.
Eden Prairie also has key locations for retailing including the City's mall which was completely
remodeled in 2001 and has approximately 1.5 million square feet of shopping. The mall is part of
the City's "Major Center Area" or downtown. Stores include a 160,000 square foot Von Maur
Department Store, a Barnes and Noble Bookstore, an 18-screen AMC movie theater, numerous
restaurants including Wildfire, Biaggi's, and other national retailers.
The Southwest Station is also part of the City's downtown and includes the Southwest metro
transit hub and offices, 900 car parking structure, multiple restaurants and a luxury 236 unit
condominium complex.
Long-term Financial Planning
The City has implemented various financial/budget policies to guide the Council and staff when
making financial decisions to ensure the long-term stability and flexibility of City finances and
operations. These polices include the following:
• The original budget should be balanced with revenues equal to expenditures,
• One-time revenues will be used for one-time expenditures,
• The City will maintain fund balance for working capital in the general fund 50% of the
next year's tax levy,
• The City will also maintain 10% of the next year's budget in fund balance for budget
stabilization and 5% of the next year's budget for budget balancing,
• The City will confine long-term debt to capital improvements or projects that cannot be
financed from current revenues,and
• The City will maintain a five-year capital improvement plan to provide for capital asset
acquisition,maintenance, replacement, and retirement.
11
As part of the budget process,the council reviews and updates the City's financial policies.
Major Initiatives
Organizational Change
During 2010 the City began the transition and hire of a new City Manager. Rick Getchow started
on 03/28/2011. He served as Hopkins, MN city manager from 2005 to 2011. Between 1996 and
2005, he served as city administrator for the Minnesota cities of Lauderdale and Hector. He
earned his bachelor's degree in political science from Miami University (Ohio) and master's
degree in public administration from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
In June 2011 the City hired a new Public Works Director, Robert Ellis. Mr. Ellis worked as the
Public Works Director in Rapid City, SD from 2008 to 2011, as the City Engineer in Rapid City,
SD from 2007 to 2008, as the Assistant City Engineer in Sioux Falls, SD from 2006 to 2007, and as
the Traffic Engineer in Sioux Falls, SD from 1999 to 2005. He received his Bachelor's Degree
in Civil Engineering from the University of Wyoming.
Flying Cloud Athletic Field Expansion
The Flying Cloud Athletic Field expansion improvements have been in the planning and
development process since 2002. The funding for this project comes from the 2005 Park Bond
Referendum which earmarked money for a variety of park improvement projects within the city.
The scope of this project was the mass grading of 28 acres of land to build four youth athletic
fields, an access road, parking lots and storm water infiltration basins on property leased by the
City from the Metropolitan Airport Commissions (MAC). The youth athletic fields consist of
two multi-purpose turf fields suitable for soccer, lacrosse and football, along with two fenced
baseball fields. The total cost of the project is approximately $1.2 M. The fields are expected to
be open for play in 2013.
Round Lake Park Updates
Many of the amenities at Round Lake Park have reached the age and condition where
replacement is needed. In addition to the play structure replacement, updates to the parking area,
the shelter and community building are planned for 2012. Parks and Recreation staffs along with
consultants have worked with members of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission to complete a master plan that ensures fit and complimentary use of the park into
the future.
12
Round Lake Park Skate Park
The skate park at Round Lake Park has been heavily used and in place for over ten years. Parks
and Recreation staff have been working with a group of skaters and bikers to design the
replacement concept. New concrete materials will be used to provide a smooth skating surface
and a longer lifespan for the park. This project will occur in 2012.
Digital Cities Award
The City of Eden Prairie was awarded first place in the Center for Digital
Government"Digital Cities Survey" in the population category of 30,000 to
74,999. The award recognized the many diverse technology projects being DIGITAL
SU EY
implemented in Eden Prairie. The largest project was the Public Safety R
Consolidation and Integration Project. For the past couple years, Information tee
Technology and Police staff have worked to consolidate the Police record system, the Fire record
system, the Police mobile system and the Police dispatch system into one system. Many
efficiencies and improvements have been made. There is now only one system to manage versus
four separate systems. Citation data is now electronically transferred from the squad cars to
Hennepin County and State Court. This improves accuracy, turnaround time on citations and
eliminates manual rekeying effort for the agencies. The City, County and State all benefited by
the implementation. This allows officers to reduce their traffic stop times down to 85% of the
previous time and spend more time conducting proactive patrols. Also, the City has completed
many County and State interfaces to the New World System to reduce manual data entry and
enhance data sharing.
Energy Initiative
Over the past five years, the City of Eden Prairie has been implementing an energy initiative
called 20-40-15 that is aimed at increasing the overall efficiency of the City's use of electricity,
fuel and other energy resources. The plan calls for increased energy efficiency in City-owned
facilities by 20 percent; increased fuel efficiency in the City's fleet of vehicles by 40 percent; and
accomplishing these goals by the year 2015. The City hired McKinstry to perform energy audits
and to identify energy saving projects within the City.
The City has recently completed Phase III of 20-40-15. This phase included the following
changes and improvements: installing a new, more efficient energy management system which
would control all heating, ventilating and air conditioning units as well as most of the interior
lighting at the City Center, modifying the ice rink dehumidifier at the Community Center to
make it more energy efficient, replacing three major pieces of cooling equipment at the City
13
Center with more energy efficient units, and replacing parking lot lights at four City parks with
energy-efficient LED lighting. For Phase III, the City received $626,700 of Energy Efficiency and
Conservation Block Grant from the federal government.
Upon completion of Phase Three, the City has officially surpassed the half-way mark, toward
accomplishing the goals set forth by the 20-40-15 initiative! With four years remaining, City staff
will continue to explore possibilities for the next phase of the 20-40-15 initiative.
Certificate of Achievement
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA)
awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Eden
Prairie for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended
December 31,2010.
The Certificate of Achievement is a prestigious national award-recognizing conformance with
the highest standards for preparation of state and local government financial reports. In order to
be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government unit must publish an easily readable and
efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report whose contents conform to program
standards. Such comprehensive annual financial report must satisfy both generally accepted
accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for
a period of one year. The City of Eden Prairie has received a Certificate of Achievement every
year since 1990. We believe our current report continues to conform to the Certificate of
Achievement program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA.
In addition, the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada
(GFOA) presented the Distinguished Budget Presentation award to the City of Eden Prairie for
its Two Year Budget for the fiscal years beginning January 1, 2010 and 2011. In order to receive
this award, a government unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a
policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and a communications device. The
award is valid for a period of two years only. The City of Eden Prairie has received a
Distinguished Budget Presentation award for every budget since 1998.
Also,the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) has
given an Award for Outstanding Achievement in Popular Annual Financial Reporting to the City
of Eden Prairie for its Popular Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2010. The Award for Outstanding Achievement in Popular Annual Financial Reporting is a
prestigious national award recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation
of state and local government financial reports. In order to receive an Award for Outstanding
Achievement in Popular Annual Financial Reporting, a government unit must publish a Popular
Annual Financial Report, whose contents conform to program standards of creativity,
presentation, understandability, and reader appeal. An Award for Outstanding Achievement in
Popular Annual Financial Reporting is valid for a period of one year only. The City of Eden
14
Prairie has received the award annually since 1998. We believe our current report continues to
conform to the Popular Annual Financial Reporting requirements, and we are submitting it to
GFOA.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our appreciation to the employees of the Finance Division for their
contribution to the preparation of this report. We would also like to thank the Mayor and
Council Members for their continued support in planning and conducting the financial
operations of the City in a responsible and progressive manner.
Respectfully submitted,
Rick Getschow Sue Kotchevar
City Manager Chief Financial Officer
15
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of Eden Prairie
Minnesota
For its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31,2010
A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial
Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers
Association of the United States and Canada to
government units and public employee retirement
systems whose comprehensive annual financial
reports(CAFRs)achieve the highest
standards in government accounting
and financial reporting.
okti OrAye cep,;(4._,
.47 D STABS`r e.
w: it� '
1 a. TION 2 President
�NiiAG4 *ear
Executive Director
16
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
City of Eden Prairie
Organization Structure
Citizens
Housing&Redevelopment
Boards&Commissions City Council Authority(HRA)*
*Council serves in this capacity
• Arts&Culture Commission
• Board of Appeal and Equalization
• Budget Advisory Commission t
• Conservation Commission City Manager
• Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission
• Heritage Preservation Commission City Attorney
• Human Rights&Diversity Commission
• Parks,Recreation&Natural Resources Commission
• Planning Commission
111 Departments
1 I I 1
Administration Community Development Parks&Natural Police Engineering/
Resources Public Works
• Communication • Assessing • Community Center • Investigation • Building Inspections • Engineering
• Facilities • Economic • Parks • Patrol • Emergency • Fleet Management
• Finance Development • Recreation • Support Services Preparedness • Streets
• Human Resources • Housing& • Fire Inspections • Utilities/Water
• IT Community Services • Fire Suppression
• Office of City Manager • Planning
17
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
Principal Officials
Elected Officials:
Mayor (Term expiration 12/31/14) Nancy Tyra-Lukens
Council Member (Term expiration 12/31/12) Ron Case
Council Member (Term expiration 12/31/12) Brad Aho
Council Member (Term expiration 12/31/14) Sherry Butcher Wickstrom
Council Member (Term expiration 12/31/14) Kathy Nelson
Appointed Officials:
City Manager Rick Getschow
City Attorney Richard Rosow
Departments:
Chief of Police Rob Reynolds
Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah
Fire Chief George Esbensen
Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer
Public Works Director Robert Ellis
18
Financial
I(DN-
Expert advice. When you need it.s"
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type
activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011,which collectively comprise the City's
basic financial statements as listed in the Table of Contents. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the City's management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial
statements based on our audit. The prior year partial comparative information has been derived from the
City's 2010 financial statements in our report dated April 29, 2011, we expressed unqualified opinions
on the respective financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each
major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information.
We conducted our audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards
applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller
General of the United States. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund
and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as of
December 31, 2011, and the respective changes in financial position and where applicable, cash flows,
thereof, and the respective budgetary comparison for the General Fund for the year then ended in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board(GASB) Statement No. 54,Fund
Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The financial statements include prior year partial comparative information. Such information does not
include all of the information required in a presentation in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. Accordingly, such information should be read in conjunction with the City's
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, from which such partial information was
derived.
Expert advice. When you need it.S' St.Cloud Twin Cities www.kdv.com
220 Park Avenue S. 3800 American Boulevard W.
Certified Public Accountants P.O.Box 1304 Suite 1000 Toll Free
Wealth Management St.Cloud,Minnesota Bloomington,Minnesota 877.912.7696
Payroll Services 56302 55431
Business Valuations Phone:320.251.7010 Phone:952.563.6800 Technology Help Desk
Technology Services Fax:320.251.1784 20 Fax:952.563.6801 866.400.6426
WV
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards,we have also issued our report dated May 8, 2012,
on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its
compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements and other
matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over
financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing and not to provide an opinion on the
internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit
performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the
results of our audit.
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that the Management's Discussion and Analysis,
which follows this report letter, and the information on the City's modified approach to infrastructure
reporting as well as the Schedule of Funding Progress, be presented to supplement the basic financial
statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the
GASB, who considers it to be an essential part of the financial reporting for placing the basic financial
statements in an appropriate operational, economic or historical context. We have applied certain
limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted auditing standards, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing
the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our
inquiries, the basic financial statements and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic
financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because
the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any
assurance.
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that
collectively comprise the City's financial statements as a whole. The accompanying supplementary
information identified in the Table of Contents is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not
a required part of the financial statements. The supplementary information is the responsibility of
management and was derived from and relates directly to, the underlying accounting and other records
used to prepare the financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing
and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare
the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other procedures in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all
material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole.
The information identified in the Table of Contents as the Introductory and Statistical Sections is
presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements
of the City. This information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it.
116m,‘4 Pe(11)4,eA 4, V- W.
KERN, DEWENTER, VIERE, LTD.
St. Cloud, Minnesota
May 8, 2012
21
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
As management of the City of Eden Prairie, this section of the City's comprehensive annual financial
report presents a discussion and analysis of the City's financial activities during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the transmittal
letter in the introductory section of this report.
Financial Highlights
The City as a Whole
• The assets of the City exceeded liabilities by$384 million. Of this amount, $58 million (unrestricted
net assets) may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors, $317 million
is invested in capital assets,net of related debt, and$9 million is restricted.
• The City's total net assets increased by $10,663,907 or 3%. The key factor in this increase was the
issuance of crossover bonds in December.
• The City's total long-term liabilities increased by $7,117,552 or 19% in comparison with the prior
year. The key factor in this increase was also due to the issuance of crossover bonds in December.
Fund Financial Statements
• The City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of$52 million, an increase
of $5,607,895 or 12% in comparison with the prior year. The changes in fund balance can be
contributed to changes to various funds including the following:
• Increase in fund balance of$236,900 in the General fund which maintains the City's fund balance
policy of maintaining adequate working capital for the first six months of next year and
providing for budget stabilization.
• Increase in fund balance of$1,783,825 in the General Obligation Improv. Revolving 2005B fund
due to the issuance of G.O. Revolving Crossover Bonds 2011D.
• Increase in fund balance of$1,301,748 in the Capital Improvement Maintenance fund, of which
details can be found in the "Other Major Funds"section.
• Decrease in fund balance of$230,134 in the Public Improvement Construction fund due mainly
to the CSAH4 to TH212 construction project. This project will be funded primarily with State
aid.
• Other governmental funds had an overall increase in fund balance of$2,528,829 due mainly to
the following increases and decreases:
• Decrease in fund balance of$878,040 in the HRA Lease Revenue 2002 fund due to planned
use of fund balance to repay debt.
• Increase in fund balance of$4,325,385 in the General Obligation bonds 2006A fund due to
the issuance of G.O. Refunding Crossover Bonds 2011C.
22
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
• Decrease in fund balance of$1,330,672 in the Parks Referendum fund due to planned project
expenses.
• Approximately 69% of the combined fund balances in the governmental funds is unrestricted
and therefore available to meet the City's current and future needs.
Using This Annual Report
This annual report consists of a series of financial statements. The Statement of Net Assets and the
Statement of Activities provide information about the activities of the City as a whole and present a
longer-term view of the City's finances. For governmental activities, the fund financial statements tell
how these services were financed in the short term as well as what remains for future spending. Fund
financial statements also report the City's operations in more detail than the government-wide
statements by providing information about the City's most significant funds. The remaining statements
provide financial information about activities for which the City acts solely as a trustee or agent for the
benefit of those outside of the government.
Reporting the City as a Whole
The Statement of Net Assets and the Statement of Activities
One of the most important questions asked about the City's finances is "Is the City as a whole better off
or worse off as a result of the year's activities?" The Statement of Net Assets and the Statement of
Activities report information about the City as a whole and about its activities in a way that helps answer
this question. These statements include all assets and liabilities using the accrual basis of accounting,
which is similar to the accounting used by most private-sector companies. All of the current year's
revenues and expenses are taken into account regardless of when cash is received or paid.
These two statements report the City's net assets and changes in them. You can think of the City's net
assets - the difference between assets and liabilities - as one way to measure the City's financial health,
or financial position. Over time, increases or decreases in the City's net assets are one indicator of
whether its financial health is improving or deteriorating. You will need to consider other nonfinancial
factors, however, such as changes in the City's property tax base and the condition of the City's roads, to
assess the overall health of the City.
In the Statement of Net Assets and the Statement of Activities, we divide the City into two kinds of
activities:
• Governmental Activities - Most of the City's basic services are reported here, including general
government, public safety, public works, and parks and recreation. Property taxes, charges for
services, and capital grants and contributions finance most of these activities.
23
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
• Business-type Activities - The City charges a fee to customers to help it cover all or most of the cost
of certain services it provides. The City's utility system (Water, Sewer and Storm Drainage Fund)
and liquor operations are reported here.
Reporting the City's Most Significant Funds
Fund Financial Statements
The fund financial statements provide detailed information about the most significant funds - not the
City as a whole. Some funds are required to be established by State law and by bond covenants.
However, the City Council establishes many other funds to help it control and manage money for
particular purposes or to show that it is meeting legal responsibilities for using certain grants and other
money. The City's two kinds of funds - governmental and proprietary - use different accounting
approaches.
• Governmental funds - Most of the City's basic services are reported in governmental funds, which
focus on how money flows into and out of those funds and the balances left at year-end that are
available for spending. These funds are reported using an accounting method called modified
accrual accounting, which measures cash and all other financial assets that can readily be converted
to cash. The governmental fund statements provide a detailed short-term view of the City's general
government operations and the basic services it provides. Governmental fund information helps to
determine whether there are more or fewer financial resources that can be spent in the near future to
finance the City's programs. We describe the relationship between governmental activities (reported
in the Statement of Net Assets and the Statement of Activities) and governmental funds in a
reconciliation provided after the fund financial statements.
• Proprietary funds - When the City charges customers for the services it provides - these services are
generally reported in proprietary funds. Proprietary funds are reported in the same way that all
activities are reported in the Statement of Net Assets and the Statement of Activities.
The City of Eden Prairie maintains two different types of proprietary funds.
• Enterprise funds are the same as the business-type activities reported in the government-wide
statements but provide more detail and additional information, such as cash flows.
• Internal service funds are an accounting device used to accumulate and allocate costs internally
among the City's various functions. The City uses internal service funds to account for activities
pertaining to employee benefits, workers compensation, personal time off accruals, property
insurance,facilities,fleet services,and information technology.
24
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
The City as Trustee
Reporting the City's Fiduciary Responsibilities
All of the City's fiduciary activities are reported in separate Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets. The City
is fiduciary for resources collected and owed to others including developers and governmental agencies.
We exclude these activities from the City's other financial statements because the City cannot use these
assets to finance operations. The City is responsible for ensuring that the assets reported in these funds
are used for their intended purposes. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for
proprietary funds.
The City as a Whole
The City's combined net assets increased from $373 million to $384 million and maintained its financial
position. By far the largest portion of the City of Eden Prairie's net assets, $317 million (approximately
83%) reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g. land, buildings, machinery, and equipment) less any
related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The City of Eden Prairie uses these
capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future
spending. Although the City's investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be
noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital
assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities.
An additional portion of the City's net assets $9 million (approximately 2%), represents resources that
are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net
assets, $58 million (approximately 15%), may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens
and creditors.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all of the categories of
net assets reported for the government as a whole.
25
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
The following schedule provides a summary of the City's net assets for the year ended December 31,
2011 (in thousands):
Governmental Activities Business-Type activities Total
2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010
Current and other assets $ 70,599 $ 66,081 $ 11,115 $ 7,026 $ 81,714 $ 73,107
Capital assets 208,381 203,633 142,669 138,307 351,050 341,940
Total assets $ 278,980 $ 269,714 $ 153,784 $ 145,333 $ 432,764 $ 415,047
Long-term liabilities 39,216 36,415 4,613 297 43,829 36,712
Other liabilities 3,707 3,587 1,321 1,504 5,028 5,091
Total liabilities $ 42,923 $ 40,002 $ 5,934 $ 1,801 $ 48,857 $ 41,803
Net assets:
Invested in capital assets,net
related debt $ 178,022 $ 169,874 $ 138,398 $ 138,307 $ 316,420 $ 308,181
Restricted 9,191 8,883 - - 9,191 8,883
Unrestricted 48,844 50,955 9,453 5,225 58,297 56,180
Total net assets $ 236,057 $ 229,712 $ 147,851 $ 143,532 $ 383,908 $ 373,244
Key elements of these changes are shown on the following page.
26
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Governmental Activities Business-Type activities Total
2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010
Revenues:
Program revenues
Charges for services $ 8,881 $ 8,609 $ 25,449 $ 23,623 $ 34,330 $ 32,232
Operating grants and
contributions 1,435 1,320 - 32 1,435 1,352
Capital grants and
contributions 4,470 3,104 415 - 4,885 3,104
General revenues
Property taxes 31,310 31,527 - - 31,310 31,527
Tax Increment 3,139 3,450 - - 3,139 3,450
Grants and contributions 752 230 4 - 756 230
Investment income 260 427 35 12 295 439
Gain on sale of capital assets 122 - - - 122 -
Total revenues 50,369 48,667 25,903 23,667 76,272 72,334
Expenses:
General government 9,264 9,183 - - 9,264 9,183
Public safety 17,538 17,986 - - 17,538 17,986
Public works 7,666 7,523 - - 7,666 7,523
Parks and recreation 9,617 9,769 - - 9,617 9,769
Interest on long term debt 1,209 1,241 - - 1,209 1,241
Water - - 8,162 14,036 8,162 14,036
Sewer - - 6,671 - 6,671 -
Storm - - 1,915 1,983 1,915 1,983
Liquor - - 10,782 10,720 10,782 10,720
Total expenses 45,294 45,702 27,530 26,739 72,824 72,441
Changes in net assets
before transfers 5,075 2,965 (1,627) (3,072) 3,448 (107)
Internal transfers 1,270 1,790 (1,270) (1,790) - -
Change in net assets 6,345 4,755 (2,897) (4,862) 3,448 (107)
Net assets,January 1 229,712 224,957 143,532 148,394 373,244 373,351
Prior period adjustment - - 7,216 - 7,216 -
Net assets,December 31 $ 236,057 $ 229,712 $ 147,851 $ 143,532 $ 383,908 $ 373,244
27
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Governmental Activities
Revenue by Source
Charges for
Other services 18%
2% Grants and
contributions 12%
Property taxes and tax
increment 68%
• For the year, property taxes totaled $31,310,140 which is a decrease of $217,430 or .7% from
2010. In 2011, delinquent tax revenue decreased from $299,634 to $20,259 due mainly to
decreased delinquent revenue and tax court adjustments.
• Charges for services increased by $272,472 or 3% from 2010. This was due mainly to increased
building permits and fees and increased revenue at the community center for memberships and
facilities rentals.
• Operating grants and contributions increased by$115,307 or 9% from 2010. This was mainly due
to the Community Development Block Grant.
• Capital grants and contributions increased by $1,366,104 or 44% from 2010. This was due
mainly to state street aid received for the TH169/494 Design Build construction project.
28
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Expenses by Program
Parks & Other General
recreation 3% government 20%
21%
Public works 17%
Public safety
39%
Expenses and Program Revenues- Governmental Activities
(in Thousands)
20,000
18,000
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
IJ i
General govt. Public safety Public works Parks and Interest on long
recreation term debt
•expenses •prog ram revenue
29
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Business-type Activities
For the business-type activities, charges for services accounts for 98% of revenues. The Liquor
operations had a negative change in net assets of $53,429 due mainly to the maintenance of the Den
Road building. The Water Fund, Sewer Fund and Storm Drainage Fund had a negative change to net
assets of$205,292, $1,755,423 and $863,382 respectively. In 2010 the City had a comprehensive utility
rate study completed and in 2011, the City implemented a new utility rate structure. The new rate
structure and future rate changes should eliminate future deficits. The new rates for commercial
accounts took effect with the February billing and new rates for residential accounts took effect with the
April billing.
Expenses and Program Revenues- Business-type Activities
(in Thousands)
$14,000 - —
$12,000
$10,000 -
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$0 I I I I
Water Sewer Storm Liquor
o Expenses ❑Program revenue
30
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
The City's Funds
The General fund is the chief operating fund of the City of Eden Prairie. The General fund had positive
financial performance and the fund balance increased by $236,900. The table below reflects the changes
to the City's General fund balance.
2011 2010 Difference
Fund Balance:
Reserved
Encumbrances $ - $ 29,000 $ (29,000)
Prepaid items - 37,238 (37,238)
Unreserved -
Budget stabilization - 5,534,147 (5,534,147)
Working capital - 15,343,104 (15,343,104)
Nonspendable 18,266 - 18,266
Unassigned
Budget stabilization 5,751,776 - 5,751,776
Working capital 15,252,553 - 15,252,553
Encumbrances 157,794 - 157,794
Total fund balance $ 21,180,389 $ 20,943,489 $ 236,900
Nonspendable Balances
The amounts classified as nonspenable consist of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as
prepaid assets.
Unassigned Balances
The unassigned fund balance consists of the budget stabilization balance and the working capital
balance.
Budget Stabilization
In compliance with City policy, $3,834,517 or 10% of the 2012 budget was maintained for budget
stabilization to be used for emergencies and maintenance of the City's Aaa bond rating. Also, $1,917,259
or 5% of the 2012 budget was maintained for budget balancing to be used for short term volatility in the
City's finances.
31
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Working Capital
In compliance with City policy, 50% of the next year's tax levy or $14,568,998 is maintained for working
capital. This amount represents the amount needed to fund operations for the first six months of the
year. The City receives a tax settlement in December that funds operations until the next settlement in
June of the next year. An additional$683,555 was assigned to cover the planned 2012 budget deficit.
Other Major Funds
The General Obligation Improvement Revolving 2005B fund increased by $1,783,825 in 2011. In
December, $1,725,325 of bond proceeds were received for the G.O. Revolving Crossover Bonds of
2011D. The City will report both the old and new bonds until the crossover date of 12/1/2013.
The General Obligation Improv. Bonds 2003D fund decreased by $40,318 in 2011. The decrease is due
to planned use of fund balance to repay debt. The City will collect deferred special assessments in the
future to cover the negative fund balance.
The Capital Improvement Maintenance fund increased by $1,301,748 in 2011. Revenue of$1,054,797
was collected which includes the tax levy, special assessments, building rental income, grant revenue for
the 20-40-15 project, donations, energy efficient rebate and investment income. The costs for the year
pertained to various park improvements,20/40/15 Energy Initiative, and police/fire enhancements.
The Public Improvement Construction fund decreased by$230,134 in 2011. Revenue of$3,515,120 was
collected which includes special assessments, state street aid, Deed grant, and a reimbursement. During
the year, $2,952,210 of state aid was received for the TH169/494 design build project. The city also
received a $275,000 Deed grant for the Valley View Rd Intersection project. As of December 31, 2011,
the fund had a negative fund balance of$2,965,129. The deficit will be reduced with the collection of
special assessments and state aid.
The Flying Cloud Drive fund increased by $27,045 in 2011. The Flying Cloud Drive project is the
development of a three lane road. The funding for this project includes bond proceeds. As of December
31, 2011,the fund had a positive fund balance of$403,733. This fund will be closed in 2012.
The City's proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government-wide
financial statements,but in more detail.
In 2011, the City implemented a new utility rate structure for water and increased rates for sewer, storm
and the fixed charge. The new rates for commercial accounts took effect with the February billing and
new rates for residential accounts took effect with the April billing. Residential and irrigation accounts
are now being billed on a tiered system.
32
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Water revenue through December 31, 2011 totaled $7,564,259 which is an increase of$1,160,353 or 18%
from 2010 due to the following:
• Sales increased by approximately$915,000 due to increased tier rates, $158,000 due to the
increase in the fixed charge, and$144,000 due to the increase in water use.
• Access charges decreased by $92,340 due mainly from the remodel of the Menards store
in 2010.
Sewer revenue through December 31, 2011 totaled $4,736,246 which is an increase of $366,778 or 8%
from 2010 due to the following:
• Sales increased by approximately $293,000 due to the rate increase and $150,000 due to
the increase in the fixed charge. Rates were increased from $2.20 to $2.35 while
consumption remained consistent from 2010.
• Access charges decreased by $39,595 due mainly from the remodel of the Menards store
in 2010.
Storm Drainage revenue through December 31, 2011 totaled$1,054,077 which is an increase of$222,346
or 27% from 2010. The increase is due to the rate increase.
Liquor sales had a moderate increase of .2% over 2010 to $11,547,025. The sales increase was
comparable to other municipal stores. Overall operating expenses remained the same except for an
increase in wages and benefits and user charges.
Budgetary Highlights
The General fund had positive operating results. Total revenues equaled $37,365,765 or 106% of the
amount budgeted. The positive performance is due to conservative budgeting including a 2% allowance
for uncollectible taxes, positive development revenue and revenues collected from the Community
Center. Other items had positive and negative variances. Total expenditures equaled $36,235,777 or
99% of the budget. Various divisions were over and under budget.
33
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Capital Assets and Debt Administration
Capital Assets
At the end of 2011,the city had$351 million invested in capital assets. Major capital assets added during
the current fiscal year by fund include the following:
Significant Projects Amount
5046/5140 Improvement Projects
TH 169/494 Design Build $ 2,971,627
Valley View Rd- Prairie Center Drive 679,861
CSAH 1 (TH212 (FCdr.) to Shetland Rd 293,066
5130 Parks Referendum
Flying Cloud Fields 1,349,617
7050 Water Capital
Water Plant Process Upgrades 901,299
Water Plant Control Upgrades 566,831
Cherokee Trail Sewer&Water 128,258
7150 Sewer Capital
Lift Stations SCADA 298,158
8540 - Facilities Capital
Community Center Stand By Generator 369,888
City Center Metal Roof Replacement - CHR 151,943
Capital Assets (net of depreciation, in thousands)
Governmental Activities Business-type Activities Total
2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010
Land&land improv. $ 32,241 $ 32,676 $ 751 $ 710 $ 32,992 $ 33,386
Infrastructure 117,280 117,008 - - 117,280 117,008
Distribution system - - 102,592 98,697 102,592 98,697
Buildings&work in progress 51,383 47,041 35,600 35,414 86,983 82,455
Leasehold improvements 40 45 612 691 652 736
Machinery&equipment 1,188 906 2,931 2,657 4,119 3,563
Autos 3,748 3,802 115 94 3,863 3,896
Other assets 2,501 2,155 68 44 2,569 2,199
Total $ 208,381 $ 203,633 $ 142,669 $ 138,307 $ 351,050 $ 341,940
34
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
The City has chosen to maintain infrastructure using the modified approach. This means the City does
not depreciate the cost of infrastructure but maintains the system at a "good condition" level or higher.
Additional information on the modified approach can be found in Note 1 of this report and additional
information on the City's capital assets can be found in Note 4 of this report.
The City's policy is to achieve an average rating of good (55-69) for all streets and trails. In the summer
of 2010, the City conducted a physical condition assessment. This assessment will be performed every
three years. As of December 31, 2010, the City's infrastructure system was rated at a Pavement
Condition Index (PCI) of 81.1%, which is higher than the City's policy level. The City's infrastructure
are constantly deteriorating resulting from the following factors: (1) traffic using the system; (2) the
sun's ultra-violet rays drying out and breaking down the top layer of pavement; (3) utility
company/private development trenching operations; (4) water damage from natural precipitation; and
(5) frost heave. The City is continuously taking actions to prolong the life of the system through short-
term maintenance activities such as pothole patching, crack sealing, seal coating, and overlaying. The
City expended $1,711,894 on infrastructure maintenance for the year ending December 31, 2011. These
expenditures delayed deterioration; however, the overall condition of the system was not improved
through these maintenance expenditures. The City has estimated that the amount of annual
expenditures required maintaining the City's infrastructure at the average PCI rating of good is
approximately$1,661,000.
Debt
At year-end, the City had approximately $43 million in bonds and other long-term liabilities
outstanding versus $36 million last year. During the year, the City issued the following debt:
• $1,135,000 G.O. Water&Sewer bonds 2011A
• $3,405,000 G.O. Bonds 2011B for Water and Sewer projects and SCBA gear
• $4,455,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds 2011C to refund the 2006A Park Referendum Bonds
• $1,805,000 G.O. Revolving Bonds of 2011D to refund the 2005B Revolving Bonds
Refer to Note 10 in the Notes to Financial Statements for a detailed schedule showing the City's long-
term debt activity.
35
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Economic Factors and Next Year's Budgets
The City's elected officials consider many factors when adopting the budget and determining fees for
service and fees that will be charged for the business-type activities. These factors include service levels,
the tax impact on the median value home, commercial/industrial and household growth, and inflation.
Currently, the 2012 general fund budgeted appropriations are $38,345,174 which is an increase of
$1,450,861 or 3.9% from the 2011 budget. Budgeted revenues less expenditures total ($683,555). The
City plans to use fund balance for the difference. The City will soon start reviewing the plans for the
2013 budget and work on a plan to more closely balance the budget.
Contacting the City's Financial Management
This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City's finances for those interested
in the government's finances. If you have questions about this report or need additional financial
information, contact the Finance Division at City of Eden Prairie, 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN
55344.
36
Government - wide
Financial Statements
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS
DECEMBER 31,2011
Primary Government
Governmental Business-type
Activities Activities Total
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 53,175,813 $ 6,242,684 $ 59,418,497
Receivables:
Accounts 530,824 2,255,977 2,786,801
Interest 112,053 9,815 121,868
Due from other governments 284,412 - 284,412
Unremitted taxes 141,641 - 141,641
Delinquent taxes 308,226 - 308,226
Unremitted special assessments 2,889 46,853 49,742
Delinquent special assessments 38,710 322,334 361,044
Deferred special assessments 7,577,824 368,282 7,946,106
Special deferred assessments 703,467 300,592 1,004,059
Inventories 110,133 1,215,328 1,325,461
Prepaid items 475,194 353,278 828,472
Land held for resale 801,699 - 801,699
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 6,335,324 - 6,335,324
Capital assets:
Nondepreciable:
Land 22,584,767 656,356 23,241,123
Infrastructure 117,280,038 - 117,280,038
Work in progress 13,018,143 1,789,770 14,807,913
Depreciable buildings,property and equipment,net 55,498,434 140,222,858 195,721,292
Total assets $ 278,979,591 $ 153,784,127 $ 432,763,718
LIABILITIES:
Accounts and contracts payable $ 1,564,526 $ 1,047,562 $ 2,612,088
Salaries payable 747,755 117,783 865,538
Interest payable 83,527 9,399 92,926
Due to other governments 435,883 142,555 578,438
Unearned revenue 875,230 3,167 878,397
Net OPEB
Due in more than one year 660,558 108,895 769,453
Bonds payable
Due within one year 4,370,000 425,000 4,795,000
Due in more than one year 32,459,277 3,846,215 36,305,492
Compensated absences
Due within one year 862,927 116,477 979,404
Due in more than one year 862,926 116,479 979,405
Total liabilities 42,922,609 5,933,532 48,856,141
NET ASSETS:
Invested in capital assets,net of related debt 178,022,468 138,397,769 316,420,237
Restricted for perpetual care,nonexpendable 133,979 - 133,979
Restricted for debt service 9,056,812 - 9,056,812
Unrestricted 48,843,723 9,452,826 58,296,549
Total net assets 236,056,982 147,850,595 383,907,577
Total liabilities and net assets $ 278,979,591 $ 153,784,127 $ 432,763,718
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
38
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Program Revenue
Operating Capital
Charges for Grants and Grants and
Expenses Services Contributions Contributions
Functions/Programs:
Primary government:
Governmental activities:
General government $ 9,263,991 $ 966,931 $ 422,102 $ 103,975
Public safety 17,538,536 3,264,191 895,065 79,605
Public works 7,665,875 322,561 68,865 4,067,716
Parks and recreation 9,617,076 4,327,323 49,289 218,404
Interest on long term debt 1,209,088 - - -
Total governmental activities 45,294,566 8,881,006 1,435,321 4,469,700
Business-type activities:
Water 8,162,292 7,743,061 - 415,000
Sewer 6,671,324 4,926,624 - -
Storm 1,915,249 1,054,077 - -
Liquor 10,781,636 11,724,900 - -
Total Business-type activities 27,530,501 25,448,662 - 415,000
Total primary government $ 72,825,067 $ 34,329,668 $ 1,435,321 $ 4,884,700
General revenues:
Taxes:
Property taxes,levied for general purposes
Property taxes,levied for debt service
Tax increment
Gain on sale of capital asset
Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs
Investment earnings
Transfers
Total general revenues and transfers
Change in net assets
Total net assets,January 1
Prior period adjustment
Total net assets,January 1 (restated)
Total net assets,December 31
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
39
Net(Expense)Revenue
and Changes in Net Assets
Governmental Business-type
Activities Activities Total
$ (7,770,983) $ - $ (7,770,983)
(13,299,675) - (13,299,675)
(3,206,733) - (3,206,733)
(5,022,060) - (5,022,060)
(1,209,088) - (1,209,088)
(30,508,539) - (30,508,539)
- (4,231) (4,231)
- (1,744,700) (1,744,700)
- (861,172) (861,172)
- 943,264 943,264
- (1,666,839) (1,666,839)
(30,508,539) (1,666,839) (32,175,378)
27,939,407 - 27,939,407
3,370,733 - 3,370,733
3,139,080 - 3,139,080
121,916 - 121,916
752,907 4,016 756,923
259,808 35,297 295,105
1,270,000 (1,270,000) -
36,853,851 (1,230,687) 35,623,164
6,345,312 (2,897,526) 3,447,786
229,711,670 143,532,000 373,243,670
- 7,216,121 7,216,121
229,711,670 150,748,121 380,459,791
$ 236,056,982 $ 147,850,595 $ 383,907,577
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
40
Fund Financial
Statements
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
BALANCE SHEET
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 1 of 2
Debt Service Capital Projects
General General
Obligation Obligation
Improv. Improv. Capital
Revolving Bonds Improvement
General 2005B 2003D Maintenance
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 22,017,792 $ 325,295 $ - $ 5,640,972
Receivables:
Accounts 505,298 - - 6,837
Interest 37,049 747 - 14,172
Due from other governments 144,509 - - -
Unremitted taxes 132,502 - - 355
Delinquent taxes 307,240 - - 986
Unremitted special assessments - - - -
Delinquent special assessments 999 - 160 7,382
Deferred special assessments - 1,909,286 904,985 50,204
Special deferred assessments - - 120,762 317,922
Due from other funds - - - 2,813,016
Prepaid items 18,266 - - -
Land held for resale - - - -
Cash and investments with escrow agent - 1,730,118 -Total assets $ 23,163,655 $ 3,965,446 $ 1,025,907 $ 8,851,846
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable $ 576,747 $ - $ - $ 89,159
Salaries payable 676,524 - - -
Interest payable - - 1,347 -
Due to other governments 20,553 - - 11
Due to other funds - - 471,303 -
Unearned revenue 401,203 - - 77,513
Deferred revenue 308,239 1,909,286 1,025,907 376,494
Total liabilities 1,983,266 1,909,286 1,498,557 543,177
Fund balances:
Nonspendable 18,266 - - -
Restricted - 2,056,160 - -
Assigned - - - 8,308,669
Unassigned 21,162,123 - (472,650) -
Totalfundbalances 21,180,389 2,056,160 (472,650) 8,308,669
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 23,163,655 $ 3,965,446 $ 1,025,907 $ 8,851,846
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
42
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
BALANCE SHEET
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 2 of 2
Capital Projects
Public Other Total
Improvement Flying Cloud Governmental Governmental
Construction Drive Funds Funds
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ - $ 402,725 $ 17,605,103 $ 45,991,887
Receivables:
Accounts - - - 512,135
Interest - 1,008 41,093 94,069
Due from other governments - - 137,613 282,122
Unremitted taxes - - 8,784 141,641
Delinquent taxes - - - 308,226
Unremitted special assessments 2,889 - - 2,889
Delinquent special assessments 30,169 - - 38,710
Deferred special assessments 1,292,696 1,320,000 2,100,653 7,577,824
Special deferred assessments 264,783 - - 703,467
Due from other funds - - 763,643 3,576,659
Prepaid items - - 10,452 28,718
Land held for resale - - 801,699 801,699
Cash and investments with escrow agent - - 4,605,206 6,335,324
Total assets $ 1,590,537 $ 1,723,733 $ 26,074,246 $ 66,395,370
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable $ 146,792 $ - $ 189,878 $ 1,002,576
Salaries payable - - 6,721 683,245
Interest payable 7,019 - 283 8,649
Due to other governments 1,191 - 146,767 168,522
Due to other funds 2,813,016 - 292,340 3,576,659
Unearned revenue - - 331,036 809,752
Deferred revenue 1,587,648 1,320,000 2,100,653 8,628,227
Total liabilities 4,555,666 1,320,000 3,067,678 14,877,630
Fund balances:
Nonspendable - - 812,151 830,417
Restricted - 371,559 12,833,980 15,261,699
Assigned - 32,174 9,610,243 17,951,086
Unassigned (2,965,129) - (249,806) 17,474,538
Total fund balances (2,965,129) 403,733 23,006,568 51,517,740
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 1,590,537 $ 1,723,733 $ 26,074,246 $ 66,395,370
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
43
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
TO THE STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS
DECEMBER 31,2011
Total fund balance-governmental funds $ 51,517,740
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Assets are different because:
1. Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore are not
reported as assets in governmental funds.
Cost of capital assets 234,674,077
Less accumulated depreciation (27,692,940)
2. Long term liabilities,including bonds payable,are not due and payable in the current period and
therefore are not reported as liabilities in the funds.
Long-term liabilities at year end consist of:
Bond principal payable (36,829,277)
3. Taxes and special assessment receivable will be collected in future years,but are not available soon
enough to pay for the current period's expenditures and therefore are deferred in the funds. 8,628,227
4. Governmental funds do not report a liability for accrued interest on long-term debt until due and payable. (74,855)
5. Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of employee benefits to
individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service fund are included in governmental
activities in the statement of net assets. 5,834,010
Total net assets-governmental activities $ 236,056,982
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
44
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES,
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 1 of 2
Debt Service Capital Projects
General General
Obligation Obligation
Improv. Improv. Capital
Revolving Bonds Improvement
General 2005B 2003D Maintenance
REVENUES
General property taxes $ 27,721,271 $ - $ - $ 93,321
Special assessments - 245,828 135,744 55,109
Penalties and interest 42,470 - - -
Licenses and permits 3,363,293 - -Intergovernmental revenue 1,143,397 - - 103,945
Charges for services 4,202,734 - - -
Fines and forfeits 554,862 - - -
Investment income 80,781 2,277 - 36,872
Building rental - - - 691,948
Miscellaneous revenue 256,957 - - 73,602
Total revenues 37,365,765 248,105 135,744 1,054,797
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government 5,477,705 - - -
Public safety 16,737,356 - - -
Public works 5,127,079 - - -
Parks and recreation 8,774,167 - - -
Interest on interfund borrowing - - 3,556 -
Capital outlay:
General government - - - 206,827
Public safety 43,236 - - 69,357
Public works - - - 6,899
Parks and recreation 31,381 - - 263,455
Debt service:
Principal 42,751 110,000 150,000 -
Interest 2,102 83,948 22,075 -
Bond issuance cost - 24,045 - 4,704
Fiscal agent fees - 450 431 -
Total expenditures 36,235,777 218,443 176,062 551,242
Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures 1,129,988 29,662 (40,318) 503,555
Other financing sources(uses):
Issuance of debt - - - 387,120
Issuance of refunding bonds - 1,725,325 - -
Premium - 28,838 - 24,010
Transfers in 294,171 - - 2,262,063
Transfers out (1,187,259) - - (1,875,000)
Total other financing sources(uses) (893,088) 1,754,163 - 798,193
Net change in fund balances 236,900 1,783,825 (40,318) 1,301,748
Fund balance(deficit)-beginning 20,943,489 272,335 (432,332) 7,006,921
Fund balance(deficit)-ending $ 21,180,389 $ 2,056,160 $ (472,650) $ 8,308,669
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
45
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES,
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 2 of 2
Capital Projects
Public Other Total
Improvement Flying Cloud Governmental Governmental
Construction Drive Funds Funds
REVENUES
General property taxes $ - $ - $ 6,704,757 $ 34,519,349
Special assessments 282,222 199,378 395,927 1,314,208
Penalties and interest - - - 42,470
Licenses and permits - - - 3,363,293
Intergovernmental revenue 3,227,210 - 741,391 5,215,943
Charges for services - - - 4,202,734
Fines and forfeits - - 2,650 557,512
Investment income - 2,667 101,782 224,379
Building rental - - - 691,948
Miscellaneous revenue 5,688 - 460,796 797,043
Total revenues 3,515,120 202,045 8,407,303 50,928,879
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government - - 3,290,823 8,768,528
Public safety - - 85,635 16,822,991
Public works - - 151,856 5,278,935
Parks and recreation - - 16,639 8,790,806
Interest on interfund borrowing 12,734 - 966 17,256
Capital outlay:
General government - - - 206,827
Public safety - - 18,253 130,846
Public works 4,127,782 2,334,904 6,469,585
Parks and recreation - - 1,594,585 1,889,421
Debt service:
Principal - - 3,775,000 4,077,751
Interest - - 1,142,276 1,250,401
Bond issuance cost - 59,544 88,293
Fiscal agent fees - - 6,995 7,876
Total expenditures 4,140,516 - 12,477,476 53,799,516
Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (625,396) 202,045 (4,070,173) (2,870,637)
Other financing sources(uses):
Issuance of debt - 27,880 415,000
Issuance of refunding bonds - 4,534,675 6,260,000
Premium - 26,880 79,728
Transfers in 404,861 - 2,438,599 5,399,694
Transfers out (9,599) (175,000) (429,032) (3,675,890)
Total other financing sources(uses) 395,262 (175,000) 6,599,002 8,478,532
Net change in fund balances (230,134) 27,045 2,528,829 5,607,895
Fund balance(deficit)-beginning (2,734,995) 376,688 20,477,739 45,909,845
Fund balance(deficit)-ending $ (2,965,129) $ 403,733 $ 23,006,568 $ 51,517,740
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
46
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES,
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Total net change in fund balances-governmental funds $ 5,607,895
Amounts reported for Governmental Activities in the Statement of Activities are different because:
1. Capital Outlays are reported in governmental funds as expenditures. However,in the Statement of Activities,the cost
of those assets is allocated over the estimated useful life's as depreciation expense.
Capital outlays 7,649,062
Depreciation expense (3,264,017)
The net affect of the disposal of capital assets
Disposals (1,155,857)
Depreciation on disposals 939,680
2. Principal payments of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds,however they have 4,077,751
no effect on net assets.
3. Interest on long-term debt in the statement of activities differs from the amount reported in the governmental funds
because interest is recognized as an expenditure in the funds when it is due and thus requires use of current financial resources.
In the Statement of Activities,however,interest expense is recognized as the interest accrues,regardless of when it is due. 18,244
4. The issuance of long-term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds and has no effect on net assets.
These amounts are reported in the governmental funds as a source of financing. These amounts are not shown as revenue
in the Statement of Activities,but rather constitute long-term liabilities in the Statement of Net Assets. (6,675,000)
5. Governmental funds report debt issuance premiums,discounts and issuance costs as another financing source or use at
the time of issuance. Premiums and discounts are reported as an unamortized asset or liability in the Government-wide
financial statements.
Premiums (79,728)
Amortization of premiums/discounts 42,389
6. Deferred gain or loss on refunded bonds are amortized on the Statement of Activities,whereas governmental funds do not
recognize these costs.
Amortization of deferred gain 76,849
7. Taxes and special assessments receivable will be collected in future years,but are not available soon enough to pay for the
current period's expenditures,and therefore are deferred in the funds. (717,656)
8.Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of employee benefits to individual funds. The net
revenue of these activities is reported in governmental activities. (174,300)
Change in net assets-governmental activities $ 6,345,312
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
47
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE-BUDGET AND ACTUAL
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31,2010
2011 2010
Budget Variance
Original Final Actual Over/(Under) Actual
REVENUES
Taxes and special assessments
General property taxes $ 27,523,994 $ 27,523,994 $ 27,721,271 $ 197,277 $ 27,984,674
Special assessments - - - - 2
Penalty and interest 30,000 30,000 42,470 12,470 73,353
Total taxes and special assessments 27,553,994 27,553,994 27,763,741 209,747 28,058,029
Licenses and permits
Liquor,beer and wine licenses 316,000 316,000 304,896 (11,104) 302,712
Business licenses 16,950 16,950 18,840 1,890 20,373
Dog registration licenses 19,000 19,000 18,189 (811) 20,072
Building permits and fees 1,141,450 1,141,450 2,094,901 953,451 1,874,411
Cable TV 791,677 791,677 775,525 (16,152) 753,291
Other permits 134,760 134,760 150,942 16,182 148,590
Total licenses and permits 2,419,837 2,419,837 3,363,293 943,456 3,119,449
Intergovernmental revenue
Police pension aid 449,355 449,355 435,160 (14,195) 430,744
Fire relief association aid 300,000 300,000 286,728 (13,272) 292,384
State street aid 74,857 74,857 68,865 (5,992) 70,620
Police training 24,000 24,000 24,238 238 23,302
Grants - - 164,072 164,072 143,133
PERA aid 52,384 52,384 52,384 - 52,384
School liaison 111,403 111,403 111,950 547 110,413
Total intergovernmental revenue 1,011,999 1,011,999 1,143,397 131,398 1,122,980
Charges for services
Public safety 115,000 115,000 95,023 (19,977) 109,837
Recreation
Youth programs 274,434 274,434 293,814 19,380 284,418
Organized athletics 326,407 326,407 313,416 (12,991) 352,866
Community center 2,302,549 2,307,549 3,113,551 806,002 2,839,516
Oak point pool 94,863 94,863 98,987 4,124 95,557
Senior center 46,968 46,968 51,016 4,048 57,409
Therapeutic recreation 8,601 8,601 12,510 3,909 6,228
Special events 15,862 15,862 10,462 (5,400) 15,185
Arts 26,888 26,888 18,577 (8,311) 24,345
Arts center 37,389 37,389 66,285 28,896 60,793
Outdoor center 84,769 84,769 50,358 (34,411) 90,198
Park facilities 64,551 64,551 78,735 14,184 73,834
Total charges for services 3,398,281 3,403,281 4,202,734 799,453 4,010,186
Fines&penalties 463,330 463,330 554,862 91,532 496,074
Investment income
Interest income 200,000 200,000 80,781 (119,219) 179,990
Total investment income 200,000 200,000 80,781 (119,219) 179,990
Other revenue 233,275 228,275 256,957 28,682 215,153
Total revenues 35,280,716 35,280,716 37,365,765 2,085,049 37,201,861
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
48
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE-BUDGET AND ACTUAL
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011 Continued
With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31,2010
2011 2010
Budget Variance
Original Final Actual Over/(Under) Actual
EXPENDITURES
Current
General Government
Administration
Legislative $ 238,389 $ 238,389 $ 257,014 $ 18,625 $ 251,480
Office of the city manager 406,988 406,988 330,072 (76,916) 360,713
Legal counsel 444,861 444,861 440,440 (4,421) 425,463
City clerk 164,220 164,220 113,084 (51,136) 215,727
Communications 501,429 526,429 526,022 (407) 471,306
Finance 706,942 706,942 698,551 (8,391) 661,503
Customer service 475,354 475,354 419,364 (55,990) 418,990
Human resources 708,614 708,614 669,193 (39,421) 684,980
Contingency 50,210 50,210 1,013 (49,197) 13,721
Total administration 3,697,007 3,722,007 3,454,753 (267,254) 3,503,883
Community development
Assessing 923,294 923,294 910,300 (12,994) 893,894
Planning 545,304 545,304 539,757 (5,547) 525,793
Community development administration 182,758 182,758 166,633 (16,125) 160,609
Economic development 104,790 108,790 108,620 (170) 97,963
Housing&community services 306,134 306,134 297,642 (8,492) 305,155
Total community development 2,062,280 2,066,280 2,022,952 (43,328) 1,983,414
Total general government 5,759,287 5,788,287 5,477,705 (310,582) 5,487,297
Public Safety
Police 11,827,341 11,827,341 11,866,574 39,233 11,678,049
Fire
Fire 3,692,333 3,692,333 3,678,862 (13,471) 3,935,468
Public safety communications 201,509 201,509 197,016 (4,493) 170,333
Emergency preparedness 36,868 36,868 31,350 (5,518) 37,819
Inspections 1,013,994 1,013,994 1,006,790 (7,204) 991,187
Total fire 4,944,704 4,944,704 4,914,018 (30,686) 5,134,807
Total public safety 16,772,045 16,772,045 16,780,592 8,547 16,812,856
Public Works
Engineering 1,111,218 1,111,218 1,094,919 (16,299) 1,065,996
Street maintenance 3,332,940 3,332,940 3,170,849 (162,091) 3,288,883
Street lighting 873,395 873,395 861,311 (12,084) 791,401
Total public works 5,317,553 5,317,553 5,127,079 (190,474) 5,146,280
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
49
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE-BUDGET AND ACTUAL
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011 Continued
With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31,2010
2011 2010
Budget Variance
Original Final Actual Over/(Under) Actual
EXPENDITURES(continued)
Current(continued)
Parks and Recreation
Park administration 403,257 403,257 395,048 (8,209) 374,152
Park maintenance 3,330,371 3,330,371 3,293,239 (37,132) 3,240,876
Parks capital outlay 47,197 47,197 30,566 (16,631) 35,611
Recreation administration 265,054 265,054 263,480 (1,574) 270,283
Youth programs 387,729 387,729 388,128 399 363,741
Organized athletics 273,344 273,344 245,358 (27,986) 251,475
Special events 53,634 53,634 66,282 12,648 76,129
Arts 125,812 125,812 127,777 1,965 110,421
Arts center 173,198 173,198 192,658 19,460 178,578
Therapeutic recreation 142,582 142,582 135,056 (7,526) 129,782
Senior center 344,357 344,357 356,704 12,347 346,744
Beaches 33,053 33,053 31,787 (1,266) 27,085
Outdoor center 157,839 157,839 104,060 (53,779) 136,610
Park facilities 31,079 31,079 34,674 3,595 32,812
Oak point pool 126,006 126,006 126,857 851 116,511
Community center 2,726,876 2,726,876 3,013,874 286,998 3,142,251
Total parks and recreation 8,621,388 8,621,388 8,805,548 184,160 8,833,061
Debt Service:
Principal 40,920 40,920 42,751 1,831 40,749
Interest 4,120 4,120 2,102 (2,018) 4,103
Total debt service 45,040 45,040 44,853 (187) 44,852
Total expenditures 36,515,313 36,544,313 36,235,777 (308,536) 36,324,346
Excess(deficiency)of revenues over expenditures (1,234,597) (1,263,597) 1,129,988 2,393,585 877,515
Other financing sources/(uses)
Transfers in 270,000 270,000 294,171 24,171 945,816
Transfers out (379,000) (379,000) (1,187,259) (808,259) (1,471,051)
Total other fmancing sources/(uses) (109,000) (109,000) (893,088) (784,088) (525,235)
Net change in fund balance $ (1,343,597) $ (1,372,597) 236,900 $ 1,609,497 352,280
Fund balance,January 1 20,943,489 20,591,209
Fund balance,December 31 $ 21,180,389 $ 20,943,489
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
50
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS
DECEMBER 31,2011
Governmental
Activities
Internal
Water Sewer Storm Drainage Liquor Service
Fund Fund Fund Fund Totals Fund
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and investments $ 4,046,287 $ 916,179 $ 607,028 $ 673,190 $ 6,242,684 $ 7,183,926
Receivables:
Accounts 1,077,164 969,440 208,436 937 2,255,977 18,689
Interest 3,307 2,875 1,924 1,709 9,815 17,984
Unremitted special assessments 23,040 23,813 - - 46,853 -
Delinquent special assessments 305,545 16,789 - - 322,334 -
Deferred special assessments 147,313 220,969 - - 368,282 -
Special deferred special assessments 120,237 180,355 - - 300,592 -
Due from other governments - - - - - 2,290
Inventory 20,890 - - 1,194,438 1,215,328 110,133
Prepaid items 8,488 314,449 60 30,281 353,278 446,476
Total current assets 5,752,271 2,644,869 817,448 1,900,555 11,115,143 7,779,498
Noncurrent assets
Capital assets:
Property,plant and equipment 129,458,768 79,460,648 41,594,706 3,327,964 253,842,086 1,455,885
Less accumulated depreciation (56,804,537) (35,792,358) (17,964,094) (612,113) (111,173,102) (55,640)
Total noncurrent assets 72,654,231 43,668,290 23,630,612 2,715,851 142,668,984 1,400,245
Total assets $ 78,406,502 $ 46,313,159 $ 24,448,060 $ 4,616,406 $ 153,784,127 $ 9,179,743
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 189,547 $ 22,575 $ 45,156 $ 790,284 $ 1,047,562 $ 561,950
Salaries payable 62,426 15,900 4,386 35,071 117,783 64,510
Interest payable 7,533 1,866 - - 9,399 23
Due to other governments 3,091 - - 139,464 142,555 267,361
Unearned revenue - - - 3,167 3,167 65,478
Current portion of bonds payable 345,000 80,000 - - 425,000 -
Current portion of compensated absences 64,002 12,905 7,226 32,344 116,477 862,927
Total current liabilities 671,599 133,246 56,768 1,000,330 1,861,943 1,822,249
Noncurrent liabilities:
Bonds Payable 3,108,046 738,169 - - 3,846,215 -
Net OPEB 45,745 45,745 4,907 12,498 108,895 660,558
Compensated absences 64,004 12,904 7,226 32,345 116,479 862,926
Total noncurrent liabilities 3,217,795 796,818 12,133 44,843 4,071,589 1,523,484
Total liabilities 3,889,394 930,064 68,901 1,045,173 5,933,532 3,345,733
NET ASSETS
Invested in capital assets,net of related debt 69,201,185 42,850,121 23,630,612 2,715,851 138,397,769 1,400,245
Unrestricted 5,315,923 2,532,974 748,547 855,382 9,452,826 4,433,765
Total net assets 74,517,108 45,383,095 24,379,159 3,571,233 147,850,595 5,834,010
Total liabilities and net assets $ 78,406,502 $ 46,313,159 $ 24,448,060 $ 4,616,406 $ 153,784,127 $ 9,179,743
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
51
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENSES AND
CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Governmental
Activities-
Internal
Water Sewer Storm Drainage Liquor Service
Fund Fund Fund Fund Total Fund
SALES AND COST OF SALES
Sales $ - $ - $ - $ 11,547,025 $ 11,547,025 $ -
Cost of sales - - - (8,656,149) (8,656,149) -
Gross profit - - - 2,890,876 2,890,876 -
OPERATING REVENUE
Sales 7,175,198 4,638,701 1,042,132 - 12,856,031 -
Conservation surcharge 6,401 - - - 6,401 -
Access charges 337,060 92,650 - - 429,710 -
Penalty charges 32,389 - - - 32,389 -
Charges for services - - - - - 13,722,408
Other revenue 13,211 4,895 11,945 129,365 159,416 1,313,021
Total operating revenues 7,564,259 4,736,246 1,054,077 129,365 13,483,947 15,035,429
OPERATING EXPENSE
Personal services 2,241,569 583,402 190,643 977,446 3,993,060 4,854,894
Chemicals and supplies 641,805 30,691 19,415 41,905 733,816 1,953,459
Contractual services 936,058 364,128 627,705 757,250 2,685,141 5,947,965
Repairs and maintenance 442,341 107,825 140,164 42,338 732,668 952,108
Disposal charges 4,411 3,640,340 - - 3,644,751 52,777
Utilities 608,643 30,328 802 77,149 716,922 1,104,680
Depreciation 2,605,917 1,721,496 851,795 115,335 5,294,543 27,235
User charges 389,899 121,734 84,725 107,252 703,610 38,718
Total operating expenses 7,870,643 6,599,944 1,915,249 2,118,675 18,504,511 14,931,836
Operating income(loss) (306,384) (1,863,698) (861,172) 901,566 (2,129,688) 103,593
NONOPERATING REVENUE(EXPENSE)
Grants - - 4,016 - 4,016 -
Investment income 58,939 (30,723) 3,774 3,307 35,297 53,995
Special assessments 165,050 176,526 - - 341,576 -
Interest (88,641) (1,866) - - (90,507) -
Bond issuance cost (39,455) (6,214) - - (45,669) -
Fiscalagentfees (872) (121) - - (993) -
Gain(loss)on disposition of capital assets 13,752 13,852 - (6,812) 20,792 121,916
Miscellaneous (162,681) (63,179) - 48,510 (177,350) -
Total nonoperating revenues(expenses) (53,908) 88,275 7,790 45,005 87,162 175,911
Income(loss)before contributions and transfers (360,292) (1,775,423) (853,382) 946,571 (2,042,526) 279,504
Contributions 415,000 - - - 415,000 -
Transfers(out) (260,000) - (10,000) (1,000,000) (1,270,000) (453,804)
Change in net assets (205,292) (1,775,423) (863,382) (53,429) (2,897,526) (174,300)
Total net assets,January 1 68,996,191 45,756,386 25,154,761 3,624,662 143,532,000 6,008,310
Prior period adjustment 5,726,209 1,402,132 87,780 - 7,216,121 -
Total net assets,January 1(restated) 74,722,400 47,158,518 25,242,541 3,624,662 150,748,121 6,008,310
Total net assets,December 31 $ 74,517,108 $ 45,383,095 $ 24,379,159 $ 3,571,233 $ 147,850,595 $ 5,834,010
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
52
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 1 of 2
Governmental
Activities-
Internal
Water Sewer Storm Drainage Liquor Service
Fund Fund Fund Fund Totals Fund
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Receipts from customers $ 7,705,647 $ 4,756,164 $ 1,043,027 $ 11,679,870 $ 25,184,708 $ 13,692,021
Payments from other funds - - - - - 54,104
Payments to other funds - - - - - (54,104)
Payments to vendors (3,277,995) (4,543,000) (899,865) (9,648,351) (18,369,211) (10,330,385)
Payments to employees (2,238,828) (554,719) (186,683) (966,884) (3,947,114) (4,616,819)
Other receipts 13,211 4,895 11,945 48,509 78,560 1,313,021
Net cash provided(used)by operating activities 2,202,035 (336,660) (31,576) 1,113,144 2,946,943 57,838
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment income 57,927 (33,598) 4,620 4,074 33,023 52,325
Net cash provided(used)by investing activities 57,927 (33,598) 4,620 4,074 33,023 52,325
CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Grant - - 4,016 - 4,016 -
Transfers in - - - 40,576 40,576 Transfers(out) (260,000) - (10,000) (1,040,576) (1,310,576) (453,804)
Net cash provided(used)by noncapital financing activities (260,000) - (5,984) (1,000,000) (1,265,984) (453,804)
CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Contributions 415,000 - - - 415,000 -
Acquisition and construction of capital assets (1,981,155) (252,861) (99,972) (113,080) (2,447,068) (606,528)
Proceeds from sale of equipment 13,752 13,852 - - 27,604 121,916
Special assessments 165,050 176,526 - - 341,576 -
Proceeds from debt 3,715,000 865,000 - - 4,580,000 -
Principal paid on debt (370,000) (85,000) - - (455,000) -
Interest and fiscal agent paid on debt (13,389) 31,834 - - 18,445 -
Net cash provided(used)by capital financing activities 1,944,258 749,351 (99,972) (113,080) 2,480,557 (484,612)
Net increase(decrease)in cash and cash equivalents 3,944,220 379,093 (132,912) 4,138 4,194,539 (828,253)
Cash and cash equivalents,January 1 102,067 537,086 739,940 669,052 2,048,145 8,012,179
Cash and cash equivalents,December 31 $ 4,046,287 $ 916,179 $ 607,028 $ 673,190 $ 6,242,684 $ 7,183,926
53
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 2 of 2
Governmental
Activities-
Internal
Water Sewer Storm Drainage Liquor Service
Fund Fund Fund Fund Totals Fund
RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME(LOSS)TO NET
CASH PROVIDED(USED)BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Operating income(loss) $ (306,384)$ (1,863,698) $ (861,172) $ 901,566 $ (2,129,688)$ 103,593
Adjustments to reconcile operating income(loss)to net cash
provided(used)by operating activates:
Depreciation 2,605,917 1,721,496 851,795 115,335 5,294,543 27,235
Miscellaneous (162,681) (63,179) - 48,510 (177,350) -
(Increase)decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable (28,822) 30,106 (30,363) 2,984 (26,095) 8,839
Special assessments receivable 183,421 (5,293) - - 178,128 -
Due from other funds - - - - - 54,104
Due from other governments - - 31,258 - 31,258 (624)
Inventory 8,516 - - (57,482) (48,966) (19,162)
Prepaid items (1,415) (11,087) 155 (14,543) (26,890) (214,711)
Increase(decrease)in liabilities:
Accounts payable (95,033) (173,622) (27,209) 100,950 (194,914) (49,192)
Salaries payable (8,284) 6,688 (849) 3,349 904 (1,078)
Unearned revenue - - - 496 496 (39,226)
Due to other governments (4,225) (66) - 4,766 475 3,010
Due to other funds - - - - - (54,104)
Net other post employment benefits 13,198 13,198 1,455 3,228 31,079 161,818
Compensated absences (2,173) 8,797 3,354 3,985 13,963 77,336
Net Cash provided(used)by operating activities $ 2,202,035 (336,660) $ (31,576) $ 1,113,144 $ 2,946,943 $ 57,838
Noncash investing,capital and financing activities:
Loss on disposition of capital assets $ $ $ (6,812)$ (6,812)$ -
54
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
AGENCY FUNDS
STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET ASSETS
DECEMBER 31,2011
Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 1,371,946
Accounts receivable 144
Total assets $ 1,372,090
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable $ 1,227,692
Due to other governments 144,398
Total liabilities $ 1,372,090
The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement
55
Notes to
Financial Statements
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Reporting Entity
The City of Eden Prairie is a municipal corporation governed by an elected mayor and four-member
council. The accompanying financial statements consist of the primary government and organizations
for which the primary government is financially accountable. In addition,the primary government may
determine through exercise of management's professional judgment that the inclusion of an
organization that does not meet the financial accountability criteria is necessary in order to prevent the
financial statements from being misleading. The criteria used to determine if the primary government is
financially accountable for a potential component unit include whether or not the primary government
appoints the voting majority of the potential component unit's board, is able to impose its will on the
potential component unit, is in a relationship of financial benefit or burden with the potential
component unit, or is fiscally depended upon by the potential component unit.
Blended Component Unit
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (H.R.A.) is a body organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Minnesota. The Authority was established in 1980 by the City to carry out certain
redevelopment projects within the City and is governed by the City Council and the Mayor. The H.R.A.
has a December 31 year-end and does not issue financial statements. This unit is included within the
H.R.A., H.R.A. Lease Revenue Facility Bonds, H.R.A. Lease Revenue 2002, 3rd Rink Lease Revenue Bonds
2007A, H.R.A. Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds 2009A, and Economic Development funds.
Government-Wide and Fund Financial Statements
The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the Statement of Net Assets and the Statement of
Activities) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the City. For the most part, the
effect of interfund activity has been removed from these statements. Governmental activities, which
normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business-
type activities,which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support.
The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or
segment are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a
specific function or segment. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who
purchase, use or directly benefit from goods, service or privileges provided by a given function or
segment and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital
requirements of a particular function or segment. Taxes and other items not properly included among
program revenues are reported instead as general revenues.
57
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Measurement Focus,Basis of Accounting and Statement Presentation
Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary
funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government-wide financial statements. Major
individual governmental funds and major individual proprietary funds are reported as separate columns
in the fund financial statements.
The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement
focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund financial statements. The fiduciary
fund financial statements include Agency funds,which utilize the accrual basis of accounting,but do not
have a measurement focus. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a
liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of the related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as
revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenues in the
year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all
eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met.
Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement
focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both
measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the
current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the
City considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal
period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting.
However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims
and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due.
Property taxes, licenses, interest and special assessments are all considered to be susceptible to accrual
and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. All other revenue items are
considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the City.
58
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
The City reports the following major governmental funds:
• The General fund is the City's primary operating fund. It accounts for the proceeds of specific
revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes other
than debt service and capital projects.
• The General Obligation Improvement Revolving 2005B fund accounts for the accumulation
of tax revenues needed to repay bonds issued to pay for the construction at 212 and
Charleson Road.
• The General Obligation Improvement 2003D fund accounts for the accumulation of
resources needed to repay bonds issued to finance the construction of streets, lateral utilities,
and drainage for the Charlson and Hillcrest Construction Projects. The primary sources of
repayment on these bonds are special assessments levied on benefited properties.
• The Capital Improvement maintenance fund accounts for the accumulation of resources to
be used for capital improvements and maintenance of City property.
• The Public Improvement Construction fund accounts for proceeds of bonds sold and special
assessments collected to finance street, drainage, and lateral utility construction within the
City.
• The Flying Cloud Drive fund accounts for proceeds of bonds sold to finance the construction
of a three lane road from south of Shady Oak Road to the south end of the Liberty Plaza
campus.
The City reports the following major proprietary funds:
• The Water fund accounts for the operations of the City-owned water system.
• The Sewer fund accounts for the operations of the City sewer service.
• The Storm Drainage fund accounts for the operations of the City's storm drainage system.
• The Liquor fund accounts for the operations of the City's three retail liquor stores and the
operations of the City-owned Den Road building which is leased to City liquor operations
and other tenants.
Additionally,the city reports the following fund types:
Internal Service funds:
• The Health & Benefits fund accounts for the activities pertaining to health, dental, life and
disability insurance. This fund also accounts for the employer's portion of pension, FICA and
medicare contributions.
59
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
• The Severance fund accounts for unused vacation and sick leave for governmental fund
employees.
• The Workers Compensation fund accounts for insurance payments and cost reimbursement
from other departments.
• The Property Insurance fund accounts for insurance payments and cost reimbursement from
other departments.
• The Facilities fund accounts for the accumulation of resources to be used for the maintenance
of the city's buildings.
• The Fleet fund accounts for the accumulation of resources to be used for the purchase and
maintenance of machinery and equipment for the City.
• The Information Technology funds accounts for planning, designing and implementing
information systems and cost reimbursement from other departments.
Fiduciary funds:
• Agency funds account for various deposits, collections and remittances of expenses for
accumulating donations and contributions in the Escrow fund,WAFTA and MCES funds.
Private-sector standards of accounting and financial reporting issued prior to December 1, 1989,
generally are followed in both the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements to the
extent that those standards do not conflict with or contradict guidance of the Governmental Accounting
Standards Board. Governments also have the option of following subsequent private-sector guidance for
their business-type activities and enterprise funds, subject to this same limitation. The City has elected
not to follow subsequent private-sector guidance.
As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government-wide financial
statements. Exceptions to this rule are payments in-lieu of taxes and other charges between the City's
water and sewer function and various other functions of the City. Elimination of these charges would
distort the direct costs and program revenues reported from the various functions concerned.
Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating
revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in
connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenue of
the City's proprietary funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for
proprietary funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on
capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating
revenues and expenses.
60
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Assets,Liabilities and Net Assets or Equity
Cash and Investments
Cash and investments, except for small amounts of cash on hand, are deposited in pooled accounts of
the City. The City invests cash surpluses in these accounts; and investment earnings, as well as gains and
losses on sales of securities, are allocated to the various funds on the basis of average cash balances.
Funds with deficit cash balance averages (interfund payable) are charged interest equivalent to the
average investment earnings lost if financing the deficits. For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the
Proprietary funds consider all unrestricted investments held in the pooled accounts of the City to be cash
equivalents because this pool is used essentially as a demand deposit account. The pooled investments
are recorded at fair value in accordance with GASB 31, and are based on quoted market prices at year
end.
Cash and Investments with Escrow Agent
Certain resources set aside for repayment of lease revenue bond proceeds and crossover refunding bond
payments are classified as cash and investments with escrow agent on the balance sheet because their use
is limited by applicable bond covenants.
Interfund Receivables/Payables
Activity between funds that are representative of lending/borrowing arrangements outstanding at the
end of the fiscal year are referred to as "due to/from other funds" (i.e., the current portion of interfund
loans) or advances to/from other funds. All other outstanding balances between funds are reported as
"due to/from other funds." Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and
business-type activities are reported in the government-wide financial statements as "internal balances."
Inventories and Prepaid Items
Liquor fund inventories are valued at average cost. The Water/Sewer and Fleet fund's inventories are
valued at cost. All inventories use the first-in/first-out (FIFO) method. Inventories of governmental
funds are recorded as expenditures when consumed rather than when purchased.
Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as
prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements.
61
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Capital Assets
Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment and infrastructure assets (e.g., roads, bridges,
sidewalks, and similar items), are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities
columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the City as assets
with an initial, individual cost of more than $10,000 and an estimated useful life in excess of 1 year. Such
assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated
capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation.
The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially
extend assets lives are not capitalized.
The City has chosen to use the modified approach for its infrastructure assets, which means the
following criteria will take place:
• The City will preserve and maintain infrastructure assets at a condition level of 60.
• The Engineering department will be in charge of determining the appropriate condition level at
which these assets are to be maintained.
• The City will maintain an inventory of these assets and perform a condition assessment every 3
years to establish that the condition level of 60 is being maintained.
• The City will make annual estimates of the amounts that must be expended to preserve and
maintain these assets at the condition level of 60.
Property, plant, and equipment, except for infrastructure, of the City are depreciated using the straight
line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Buildings 5-50 years
Land improvements 10-30 years
Leasehold improvements 10-25 years
Equipment 5-20 years
Autos 5-20 years
Other assets 5-30 years
Distribution system 50-60 years
Intangible assets 3 years
62
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Compensated Absences
The City compensates employees upon termination for unused PTO. Such pay will be reflected as a
liability in the government-wide financial statement and accrued as an expense as it is earned in an
internal service fund.
General Property Taxes
Property tax levies are set by the City Council in December each year and are certified to Hennepin
County for collection in the following year. In Minnesota, counties act as collection agents for all
property taxes.
The County spreads all levies over taxable property. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are
recorded as receivables by the City at that date. Revenues are accrued and recognized in the year
collectible,net of delinquencies.
Real property taxes may be paid by taxpayers in two equal installments on May 15 and October 15.
Personal property taxes may be paid on February 28 and June 30. The County provides tax settlements
to taxing districts in February,June,and December.
In the governmental fund financial statements, taxes that remain unpaid at December 31 are classified as
delinquent taxes receivable and are fully offset by deferred revenue because they are not available to
finance current expenditures.
Special Assessment Levies
Special assessments represent the financing for public improvements paid for by the benefiting property
owner. In the fund financial statements, special assessment revenue and related interest income is
generally recognized in the year collected. Hennepin County acts as the billing and collection agent.
Amounts collected by the County during the year that have not yet been remitted to the City are
considered collections for purposes of revenue recognition.
Deferred special assessments receivable represents principal amounts due in future years. Special
deferred assessments receivable includes Green Acres, disability, senior citizen owned property or other
qualified hardship properties. These special assessments are deferred until such time the property loses
its exempt status. While these taxes remain a valid receivable, the timing of their collection is uncertain.
Interest accrues from the year of the deferment.
Delinquent special assessments receivable represents special assessments principal and interest that are
past due. In the governmental fund financial statements, deferred and delinquent special assessments
receivable are fully offset by deferred revenue because such assessment revenue is not available currently.
63
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Long-term Obligations
In the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund financial statements, long-term debt
and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the statement of net assets. Bond premiums
and discounts, as well as issuance costs, are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the
effective interest method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount.
Bond issuance costs are reported as deferred charges and amortized over the term of the related debt.
In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as
well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as
other financing sources. Premiums and discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing
sources/uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are
reported as debt service expenditures.
Fund Balance Classifications
In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose
constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows:
• Nonspendable-consists of amounts that are not in spendable form,such as prepaid assets.
• Restricted-consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors,
grantors or contributors;or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions.
• Committed-consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints are established by
Resolution of the City Council.
• Assigned-consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints reflect the specific purpose
for which it is the City's intended use. These constraints are established by the City council
and/or management. Pursuant to City Council Resolution, the City's City Manager or Finance
Manager is authorized to establish assignments of fund balance.
• Unassigned-is the residual classification for the general fund and also reflects negative residual
amounts in other funds.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City's policy to first use
restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed.
When unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City's policy to use resources in the following
order; 1)committed 2)assigned 3)unassigned.
64
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
The City's fund balance policy requires the unassigned for working capital fund balance component to
equal 50% of the next year's budgeted tax revenue. In recognition that the amount for working capital
only covers operating costs for the first six months of the year,the City will maintain an unassigned fund
balance component for budget stabilization which is 15% of the next year's budget. If the balance falls
below 15%, a plan would be developed and implemented to replenish the fund.
Prior Period Comparative Financial Information/Reclassification
The financial statements include certain prior year partial comparative information but not at the level
of detail required for a presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Accordingly, such information should be read in conjunction with the City's
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, from which the summarized information
was derived. Also, certain amounts presented in the prior year data have been reclassified in order to be
consistent with the current year's presentation.
Note 2—Stewardship, Compliance and Accountability
Budgetary Information
An annual budget is adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles for the
General fund. The City does not budget for its Special Revenue funds. All annual appropriations lapse at
fiscal year end.
The proposed budget is presented to the City Council for review. The Council then holds truth-in-
taxation hearings after which a final General Fund annual budget is legally adopted by no later than
December 31.
The appropriated budget is prepared by department and division. The City's directors and division
managers may make transfers of appropriations within a division. Transfers of appropriations between
departments require the approval of the City Manager. The legal level of budgetary control is the fund
level. Any changes in the total budget of each fund must be approved by a majority vote of the City
Council. During the year, adjustments between the original and final General fund amended budget
totaled$29,000. Following are changes made to the original budget during the year:
Communications website redesign $ 25,000
Economic Development Business survey 4,000
$ 29,000
65
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 2—Stewardship, Compliance and Accountability (Continued)
Deficit Fund Equity
The following governmental funds had deficit fund balances at December 31,2011:
Major Funds:
General Obligation Improv. Bonds 2003D $ 472,650
Public Improvements Construction 2,965,129
Non-Major Governmental Funds:
Capital Equip Notes 2008A 23,622
CIP Trails 16,706
Sprint/Nextel 46,590
Shady Oak Road North 159,276
Shady Oak Road South 3,612
Internal Service Funds:
Health and Benefits 143,204
Severance 6,819
The fund balance deficits of these individual Debt Service and Capital Project funds will be financed by
property tax levies and special assessments. The fund balance deficit of the Severance Internal Service
fund will be financed by user charges. The fund balance deficit of the Health and Benefits fund is due to
the OPEB liability which the City will not fund since it pertains only to the Implicit Rate.
66
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 3—Cash and Investments
Components of Cash and Investments
Cash and investments at year-end consist of the following:
Deposits $ 292,476
Investments 66,824,736
Cash on hand 8,555
Total $ 67,125,767
Cash and investments are presented in the financial statements as follows:
Statement of Net Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 59,418,497
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 6,335,324
Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets
Cash and investments 1,371,946
$ 67,125,767
Deposits
In accordance with Minnesota Statutes,the City maintains deposits at those depository banks authorized
by the City Council,including checking accounts and certificates of deposits.
The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits:
Custodial Credit Risk:
In the case of deposits,this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure,the City's deposits may be lost.
Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit insurance, corporate surety
bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered
by federal deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills,
notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligation rate "A" or better; revenue
obligations rate "AA" or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan
Bank; and certificated of deposit. Minnesota Statues require that securities pledged as collateral be held
in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an account at a trust department
67
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 3—Cash and Investments (Continued)
of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or controlled by the financial
institution furnishing the collateral. It is the City's policy to limit collateral to what is authorized by
Minnesota Statutes.
At year-end, the carrying amount of the City's deposits was $292,476 while the balance on the bank
records was $292,476. At December 31, 2011, all deposits were fully covered by federal depository
insurance,surety bonds,or by collateral held by the City's agent in the City's name.
Investments
As of December 31, 2011,the city had the following investments and maturities:
Investment Maturities (in Years)
Fair Less 1 to 5 Credit
Value Than 1 Year Years Risk
U.S. Agencies $ 23,102,758 $ 9,460,538 $ 13,642,220 AAA
Municipal Bonds 5,045,635 2,864,116 2,181,519 (see Note A)
Commercial Paper 3,244,117 3,244,117 - N/R
Negotiable Certificate of Deposit 2,668,293 1,334,688 1,333,605 N/R
Mutual Funds 32,763,933 32,763,933 - N/R
Total $ 66,824,736 $ 49,667,392 $ 17,157,344
Investments are subject to various risks,the following of which are considered the most significant.
A) Moody's Investor Service was used as the primary agency for the municipal bond ratings,in the case that
Moody's did not provide a rating, Standard&Poor's was used. Below is the fair value of municipal bonds
by credit rating:
AA3 $ 1,841,534
AA 886,703
AA- 682,794
BAA2 519,215
AAA 361,679
AA2 308,218
Migl 225,369
A+ 220,123
$ 5,045,635
68
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 3—Cash and Investments (Continued)
Interest Rate Risk
Per City policy, the City will match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. Unless
matched to a specific cash flow, the City will not directly invest in securities maturing more than five (5)
years from the date of purchase. Reserve funds and other funds with longer-term investment horizons
may be invested in securities exceeding five (5) years if the maturities of such investments are made to
coincide as nearly as practicable with the expected use of funds. The intent to invest in securities with
longer maturities will be disclosed to the City Council. Currently, the City does not have any
investments maturing more than five years from the date of purchase.
Credit Risk
It is the City's policy to limit its investments to the following types as authorized by Minnesota Statutes:
• Direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies, its
instrumentalities or organizations created by an act of congress, excluding mortgage-backed
securities defined as high risk.
• Shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940
and whose only investments are in securities described above or in general obligation tax exempt
securities, or repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements.
• Repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements with banks that are members of the Federal
Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000: a primary reporting dealer in U.S.
government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; certain Minnesota securities
broker-dealers, or, a bank qualified as a depositor.
• Commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, of the
higher quality, and maturing in 270 days or less.
• Banker's acceptance of U.S.banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System.
• General obligations of a state of local government.
• Money market mutual funds meeting the conditions of rule 2a-7 of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The fair value of the position in the pool is the net asset value per share provided by
the pool.
69
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 3—Cash and Investments (Continued)
Custodial Credit Risk
For an investment, custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the
city will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the
possession of an outside party. The City's investments held by the broker-dealer were insured by
Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) or other supplemental insurance as of December 31,
2011. However, each investment brokerage firm may have a limit to their supplemental insurance and
because of the size of the City's portfolio in relation to the brokerage firm's excess SIPC coverage limits
the portion of the supplemental policy applicable to the City's portfolio is unknown. The City accepts
the risk due to the controls in place at the broker-dealer. The City's investment policy does not further
address this risk, but the City typically limits its exposure by purchasing insured or registered
investments,or by the control of who holds the securities.
Concentration Risk
This is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the City's investment (considered 5
percent or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as
Treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. The City's investment policy does not limit the
concentration of investments. At year end, the City held the following investments in securities of a
single issuer which exceeded 5%.
Issuer Percentage
FHLBDeb 8.31%
70
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 4-Capital Assets
Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31,2011 was as follows:
2011 2011
Beginning Ending
Balance Transfers Increases Decreases Balance
Governmental activities:
Capital assets,not being depreciated:
Land $ 22,600,571 $ - $ - $ 15,804 $ 22,584,767
Infrastructure 117,007,512 197,218 75,308 - 117,280,038
Work in progress 7,594,200 (987,280) 6,411,223 - 13,018,143
Total capital assets,not being depreciated 147,202,283 (790,062) 6,486,531 15,804 152,882,948
Capital assets,being depreciated:
Buildings 49,400,366 - 202,978 289,178 49,314,166
Land improvements 13,248,626 - 279,240 40,199 13,487,667
Leasehold improvements 77,318 - - - 77,318
Machinery and equipment 3,522,992 322,879 285,448 201,415 3,929,904
Autos 8,899,615 - 755,632 437,487 9,217,760
Other assets 6,679,029 467,183 245,761 171,774 7,220,199
Total capital assets,being depreciated 81,827,946 790,062 1,769,059 1,140,053 83,247,014
Total Capital assets,cost 229,030,229 - 8,255,590 1,155,857 236,129,962
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Buildings 9,953,015 - 1,098,121 102,102 10,949,034
Land improvements 3,172,897 - 693,864 35,834 3,830,927
Leasehold improvements 32,457 - 5,054 - 37,511
Machinery and equipment 2,617,258 - 325,407 201,060 2,741,605
Autos 5,097,574 - 801,410 428,910 5,470,074
Other assets 4,523,807 - 367,396 171,774 4,719,429
Total accumulated depreciation 25,397,008 - 3,291,252 939,680 27,748,580
Total capital assets,being depreciated,net 56,430,938 790,062 (1,522,193) 200,373 55,498,434
Governmental activities capital assets,net $ 203,633,221 - $ 4,964,338 $ 216,177 $ 208,381,382
71
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 4-Capital Assets (Continued)
2011
Beginning 2011
Balance, Ending
Restated Transfers Increases Decreases Balance
Business-type activities:
Capital assets,not being depreciated:
Land 656,356 - - - 656,356
Work in progess 2,409,529 (2,282,347) 1,662,588 - 1,789,770
Total capital assets,not being depreciated 3,065,885 (2,282,347) 1,662,588 - 2,446,126
Capital assets,being depreciated:
Land improvements 62,412 - 44,892 - 107,304
Buildings 57,030,607 1,959,277 - - 58,989,884
Distribution system 185,641,963 147,822 243,680 - 186,033,465
Leasehold improvements 892,090 - - 164,696 727,394
Machinery and equipment 3,665,886 175,248 385,094 75,074 4,151,154
Autos 933,780 - 68,710 44,236 958,254
Other assets 412,867 - 42,103 26,465 428,505
Total capital assets,being depreciated 248,639,605 2,282,347 784,479 310,471 251,395,960
Total Capital assets,cost 251,705,490 - 2,447,067 310,471 253,842,086
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Land improvements 8,543 - 3,713 - 12,256
Buildings 24,025,848 - 1,153,956 - 25,179,804
Distribution system 79,729,044 - 3,712,840 - 83,441,884
Leasehold improvements 201,284 - 72,357 157,884 115,757
Machinery and equipment 1,008,877 - 285,971 75,074 1,219,774
Autos 839,424 - 47,598 44,236 842,786
Other assets 369,198 - 18,108 26,465 360,841
Total accumulated depreciation 106,182,218 - 5,294,543 303,659 111,173,102
Total capital assets,being depreciated,net 142,457,387 2,282,347 (4,510,064) 6,812 140,222,858
Business-type activities capital assets,net $ 145,523,272 $ - $ (2,847,476) $ 6,812 $ 142,668,984
72
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 4—Capital Assets (Continued)
Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the City as follows:
Governmental activities:
General government $ 428,722
Public safety 860,365
Public works 523,222
Parks and recreation 1,451,708
Capital assets held by the government's internal
service funds are charged to the various functions based
on their usage of the assets 27,235
Total depreciation expense-governmental activities $ 3,291,252
Business-type activities:
Water $ 2,605,917
Sewer 1,721,496
Storm 851,795
Liquor 115,335
Total depreciation expense-business-type activities $ 5,294,543
Note 5—Interfund Receivables and Payables
The composition of due to/from balances as of December 31, 2011, is as follows:
Due from Due to
other funds other funds
G.O. Improv.Bonds 2003D $ - $ 471,303
Capital Improvement Maintenance 2,813,016 -
Public Improvements Construction - 2,813,016
Non-Major Governmental Funds 763,643 292,340
Total $ 3,576,659 $ 3,576,659
The funds will be repaid as special assessment revenue,taxes and user charges are received.
Interfund payables and receivables are representative of lending/borrowing arrangements to cover
deficit cash balances.
73
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 6—Interfund Transfers
The composition of interfund transfers as of December 31,2011, is as follows:
Transfers In Transfers Out Amount
General Water fund $ 260,000
Storm Drainage fund 10,000
Non-Major Governmental funds 24,171
Capital Improvement Maintenance General 808,259
Liquor fund 1,000,000
Internal service funds 453,804
Public Improvement Construction Non-Major Governmental funds 404,861
Non-Major Governmental funds General 379,000
Capital Improvement Maintenance 1,875,000
Public Improvement Construction 9,599
Flying Cloud Drive 175,000
Total of transfers $ 5,399,694
Interfund transfers allow the City to allocate financial resources to the funds that receive benefit from
services provided by another fund.All of the City's interfund transfers fall under that category. All of the
2011 transfers are considered routine and consistent with previous practices.
74
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 7—Pension Plan
Defined Benefit Pension Plans-Statewide
Plan Description
All full-time and certain part-time employees of the City of Eden Prairie are covered by defined benefit
plans administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA
administers the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire
Fund (PEPFF), which are cost-sharing, multiple-employer retirement plans. These plans are established
and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356.
GERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are
covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. All new members must participate in the
Coordinated Plan. All police officers and fire-fighters who qualify for membership by statute are covered
by the PEPFF.
PERA provides retirement benefits as well as disability benefits to members, and benefits to survivors
upon death of eligible members. Benefits are established by state statute, and vest after three years of
credited service. The defined retirement benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any
five successive years of allowable service,age, and years of credit at termination of service.
Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERA's Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The
retiring member receives the higher of a step-rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual
formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2 percent of
average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 2.7 percent for each remaining year. The
annuity accrual rate for a Coordinated Plan member is 1.2 percent of average salary for each of the first
10 years and 1.7 percent for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.7
percent of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7 percent for Coordinated Plan members for
each year of service. For PEPFF members, the annuity accrual rate is 3.0 percent for each year of service.
For all PEPFF members and GERF members hired prior to July 1, 1989 whose annuity is calculated
using Method 1, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90. Normal retirement
age is 55 for PEPFF members and 65 for Basic and Coordinated members hired prior to July 1, 1989.
Normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at 66 for Coordinated
members hired on or after July 1, 1989. A reduced retirement annuity is also available to eligible
members seeking early retirement.
75
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 7—Pension Plan (Continued)
There are different types of annuities available to members upon retirement. A single-life annuity is a
lifetime annuity that ceases upon the death of the retiree—no survivor annuity is payable. There are also
various types of joint and survivor annuity options available which will be payable over joint lives.
Members may also leave their contributions in the fund upon termination of public service in order to
qualify for a deferred annuity at retirement age. Refunds of contributions are available at any time to
members who leave public service,but before retirement benefits begin.
The benefit provisions stated in the previous paragraphs of this section are current provisions and apply
to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not
receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public
service.
PERA issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required
supplementary information for GERF and PEPFF. That report may be obtained on the Internet
at www.mnpera.org,by writing to PERA at 60 Empire Drive#200, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55103-2088 or by
calling (651) 296-7460 or 1-800-652-9026.
Funding Policy
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. These statutes
are established and amended by the state legislature. The city makes annual contributions to the pension
plans equal to the amount required by state statutes. GERF Basic Plan members and Coordinated Plan
members were required to contribute 9.1% and 6.25%, respectively, of their annual covered salary in
2011. PEPFF members were required to contribute 9.6% of their annual covered salary in 2011. In 2011,
the City of Eden Prairie was required to contribute the following percentages of annual covered payroll:
11.78% for Basic Plan members, 7.25% for Coordinated Plan members, and 14.4% for PEPFF members.
The City's contributions to the Public Employees Retirement Fund for the years ending December 31,
2011, 2010 and 2009 were $962,681, $911,909, and $858,694, respectively. The City's contributions to the
Public Employees Police & Fire Fund for the years ending December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 were
$909,622, $879,255, and $849,003, respectively. The City's contributions were equal to the contractually
required contributions for each year as set by state statute.
Defined Contribution Plan
Council members of the City of Eden Prairie are covered by the Public Employees Defined Contribution
Plan (PEDCP), a multiple-employer deferred compensation plan administered by the Public Employees
Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). The PEDCP is a tax qualified plan under Section 401(a)
of the Internal Revenue Code and all contributions by or on behalf of employees are tax deferred until
time of withdrawal.
76
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 7—Pension Plan (Continued)
Plan benefits depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus investment earnings, less
administrative expenses. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353D.03, specifies plan provisions, including the
employee and employer contribution rates for those qualified personnel who elect to participate. An
eligible elected official who decides to participate contributes 5 percent of salary which is matched by the
elected official's employer. Employer and employee contributions are combined and used to purchase
shares in one or more of the seven accounts of the Minnesota Supplemental Investment Fund. For
administering the plan, PERA receives 2 percent of employer contributions and twenty-five hundredths
of one percent of the assets in each member's account annually.
Total contributions made by the City of Eden Prairie during the year ending December 31,2011 were:
Amount % of Covered Payroll Required
Employee Employer Employee Employer Rates
$ 2,231 $ 2,231 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Defined Benefit Pension Plans-Volunteer Fire Fighter's Relief Association
Plan Description
The Eden Prairie Firefighter's Relief Association is the administrator of a single employer defined benefit
pension plan established to provide benefits for members of the Eden Prairie Fire Department.
Volunteer firefighters of the City are members of the Eden Prairie Fire Fighter's Relief Association. Full
retirement benefits are payable to members who have reached age 50 and have completed 15 years of
service for monthly service pension, or 10 years of service for lump sum service pension. Partial benefits
are payable to members who have reached 50 and have completed 10 years of service. Disability benefits
and widow and children's survivor benefits are also payable to members or their beneficiaries based
upon requirements set forth in the bylaws. These benefit provisions and all other requirements are
consistent with enabling state statutes.
The Association issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and
required supplementary information. That report may be obtained by writing to Eden Prairie
Firefighter's Association, 14800 Scenic Heights Rd., Eden Prairie, MN 55344 or by calling (952) 949-
8367.
77
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 7—Pension Plan (Continued)
Funding Policy
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 69.772 specifies minimum support rates required on an annual basis. The
minimum support rates from the municipality and from State aid are determined as the amount
required to meet the normal cost plus amortizing any existing prior service costs over a ten year period.
The City's obligation is the financial requirement for the year less state aids. Any additional payments by
the City shall be used to amortize the unfunded liability of the relief association. The Association is
comprised of volunteers; therefore, there are no payroll expenditures (i.e., there are no covered payroll
percentage calculations). During the year, the City recognized as revenue and as an expenditure an on-
behalf payment of$286,728 made by the State of Minnesota for the Relief Association.
The City's annual pension cost for the current year and related information is as follows:
Annual pension cost- $1,116,805 Asset valuation method-Market
Valuation date-December 31, 2010 Actuarial assumptions:
Actuarial cost method-Entry age normal cost Investment return-5%per year
Amortization method-Level dollar open Assumed inflation rate-N/A
Remaining amortization period Cost of living adjustment-N/A
Normal cost-20
Prior service cost-10
Three Year Trend Information
Year
Ended Actual Contribution Required Percentage
Dec 31, City State Total Contribution Contributed
2008 $ 411,221 $ 335,779 $ 747,000 $ 747,000 100%
2009 462,805 284,195 747,000 747,000 100%
2010 1,129,002 292,384 1,421,386 1,421,386 100%
2011 830,077 286,728 1,116,805 1,116,805 100%
78
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 7—Pension Plan (Continued)
Required Supplementary Information
Actuarial
Actuarial Actuarial Accrued (Unfunded)
Valuation Value of Liability Overfunded Funded
Date Assets (AAL) AAL Ratio
12/31/2009 $ 14,511,437 $ 18,574,088 $ (4,062,651) 78.13%
12/31/2010 16,967,737 19,282,133 (2,314,396) 88.00%
12/31/2011 16,838,952 19,282,133 (2,443,181) 87.33%
The Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore, there are no payroll expenditures (i.e.,there are
no covered payroll percentage calculations).
Note 8—Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan
Plan Description
The City provides post-employment insurance benefits to certain eligible employees through the City's
Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan, a single-employer defined benefit plan administered by the City.
All post-employment benefits are based on contractual agreements with employee groups. These
contractual agreements do not include any specific contribution or funding requirements. The Plan does
not issue a separate report. These benefits are summarized as follows:
Post-Employment Insurance Benefits
All retirees of the City have the option under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage
through the City from the time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of eligibility for
Medicare. For members of all employee groups, the retiree must pay the full premium to continue
coverage for medical and dental insurance.
The City is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health insurance coverage in the
same insurance pool as its active employees, whether the premiums are paid by the City or the retiree.
Consequently, participating retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as an "implicit
rate subsidy." This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more favorable
premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if purchasing insurance on their own, due to
being included in the same pool with the City's younger and statistically healthier active employees.
79
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 8—Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan (Continued)
Funding Policy
The required contribution is based on projected pay-as-you-go financing requirements, with additional
amounts to pre-fund benefits as determined annually by the City.
Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation
The City's annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on annual required contributions (ARC) of
the City, an amount determined on an actuarially determined basis in accordance with the parameters of
GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 45. The City prospectively implemented these statements during 2008. The
ARC represents a level funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal costs each
year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed 30
years. The following table shows the components of the City's annual OPEB cost for the year, the
amount actually contributed to the plan, and the changes in the City's net OPEB obligation to the plan:
Annual required contribution $ 288,354
Interest on net OPEB obligation 25,747
Adjustment to annual required contribution (34,900)
Annual OPEB cost expense 279,201
Contributions made 81,899
Increase in net OPEB obligation 197,302
Net OPEB obligation-beginning of year 572,151
Net OPEB obligation-end of year $ 769,453
Other post employment benefits are generally liquidated through the Health and Benefits Internal
Service funds. The City's annual OPEB cost,the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan,
and the net OPEB obligation for the year are as follows:
% of Annual
Fiscal Annual Employer OPEB Cost Net OPEB
Year Ended OPEB Cost Contribution Contributed Obligation
12/31/09 216,372 44,890 20.7% 354,030
12/31/10 282,844 64,723 22.9% 572,151
12/31/11 279,201 81,899 29.3% 769,453
80
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 8—Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan (Continued)
Funded Status and Funding Progress
As of January 1, 2010, the plan was zero percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was
$2,438,910, and the actuarial value of assets was $0, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability
(UAAL) of$2,438,910. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was
$17,127,274, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 14.2%.
Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and
assumptions about the probability occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include
assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined
regarding the funded status of the plan and ARCs of the employer are subject to continual revision as
actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The
Schedule of Funding Progress immediately following the notes to the basic financial statements presents
multi-year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing
over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits.
Actuarial Methods and Assumptions
Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as
understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the
time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and
plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are
designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial
value of assets, consistent with the long-term perspective of the calculations.
In the January 1, 2010 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method was used. The
actuarial assumptions included: a 4.5% percent investment rate of return (net of investment expenses)
based on the City's own investments; an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 8.5% initially, reduced by
decrements to an ultimate rate of 5% after eight years for medical insurance. Both rates included a 2.5%
inflation assumption. The UAAL is being amortized on a level dollar basis over a closed period. The
remaining period at January 1,2010 is 30 years or less.
81
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 9—Leases
As Lessee
The City has entered into lease agreements for two space leases in connection with its liquor store
operations. Rental expense, excluding a prorated share of real estate taxes and common area operating
costs,for the year ended December 31,2011,was approximately$207,500.
The following is an annual schedule of future minimum lease payments under these leases:
Year Ended Prairie Prairie
December 31, Village View
2012 $ 123,014 $ 90,169
2013 126,710 90,169
2014 130,494 92,172
2015 134,430 92,172
2016 138,454 94,176
2017-2019 264,430 286,536
$ 917,532 $ 745,394
The City has entered into a lease agreement with the Metropolitan Airports Commission for expanded
athletic fields. Rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2011,was $3,605. The City will continue
to pay this amount,escalating 3%per year for the remaining lease term,which expires August 1, 2013.
As Lessor
The City occupies approximately one-third of the City Center building. The remaining two-thirds are
primarily leased to the Eden Prairie Independent School District and C.H. Robinson Company. The City
recorded 2011 rental revenue of approximately $439,000 from these two tenants. Both the School
District and C.H. Robinson Company have signed formal lease agreements wherein the City will receive
approximately $463,000 annually through February 28, 2014 plus the lessee's portion of maintenance,
insurance and taxes.
The City has entered into a lease agreement with Pure Grace for the rental of space located at the Smith
Douglas More House. Rental income for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $34,000. This lease will
expire on December 31,2017. The City will receive $34,000 annually through 2017.
82
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 9—Leases (Continued)
The City has entered into a lease agreement with Ace Daycare for the rental of space located at 8098
Glen Lane. Rental income for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $55,400. This lease will expire on
September 30,2015. The City will receive $66,500 annually through 2015.
The City has entered into a lease agreement with BE Ventures I, Inc. d/b/a Complete Nutrition for 1,517
square feet of rental of space located in the Den Road Liquor store building. Rental income for the year
ended December 31,2011 was $32,686. The City will receive$34,891 annually through 2016.
The City has entered into a lease agreement with Jeneka LLC d/b/a Encore Consignment Boutique 3,662
square feet of rental of space located in the Den Road Liquor store building. Rental income will not be
collected until the year 2012. The City will receive rent annually through 2018. Annual rent will be
$73,809 in year 1, $79,018 in year 2, $91,551 in years 3-5, and$98,875 in years 6 and 7.
The City has entered into a lease agreement with a tenant for the rental of space located at 9100 Riley
Lake Road (the "Riley House"). Rental income for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $3,685. This
lease will expire on June 10, 2012. The City will receive $3,300 through June 2012.
The City has entered into a lease agreement with Eden Prairie Historical Society for use of space located
at 13600 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Cummins-Grill House). Rental income for the year
ended December 31,2011 was $1. The City will receive $1 annually until March 31,2015.
The assets acquired for these lease agreements is as follows:
Governmental Liquor
Activities Fund
Asset:
Land $ 2,628,813 $ 536,659
Building 12,124,160 1,900,408
Less: Accumulated depreciation (4,064,363) (454,613)
Total $ 10,688,610 $ 1,982,454
Depreciation Expense $ 278,674 $ 37,936
83
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 10—Long Term Debt
Bonds
The City issues general obligation bonds to provide funds for the acquisition and construction of major
capital facilities. General obligation bonds have been issued for both governmental and business-type
activities. General obligation bonds are direct obligations and pledge the full faith and credit of the City.
The City also issues assessment debt with governmental commitment to provide funds for the
construction of streets and utilities. These bonds will be repaid from amounts levied against the property
owners benefited by this construction. In the event that a deficiency exists because of unpaid or
delinquent assessments at the time a debt service payment is due, the City must provide resources to
cover the deficiency until other resources are received. Assessment debt with governmental commitment
has been issued for governmental activities.
The City also issued lease revenue bonds where the government pledges income derived from lease
agreements to pay debt service.
84
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 10-Long Term Debt (Continued)
Bonds currently outstanding (in thousands of dollars) are as follows:
2011
Interest Original Amount
Maturities Rates Issue Outstanding
Governmental Activity
General obligation bonds
G.O. Refunding Bonds of 2003A 2012 3.00-3.65% $ 3,185 $ 335
G.O. Refunding Bonds of 2003C 2014 2.00-3.90% 1,445 550
G.O. Bonds of 2005C 2026 4.10-4.20% 4,920 4,920
G.O. Bonds of 2006A 2014 3.50-4.00% 8,425 5,980
G.O. Bonds of 2006B 2027 4.25-4.50% 4,290 3,740
G.O. Bonds of 2006C 2012 4.25% 1,080 235
G.O. Equip Notes of 2008A 2018 3.00-4.00% 3,120 2,240
G.O. Equip Notes of 2009B 2018 3.00% 2,455 1,955
G.O. CIP Refunding Bonds 2009C 2014 2.50-3.00% 1,395 865
G.O. bonds 2011B 2016 2.50-3.00% 415 415
G.O. Refunding Bonds 2011C 2021 1.25-2.10% 4,455 4,455
Lease revenue bonds
Public Facility Bonds of 2007A 2028 3.60-4.50% 1,630 1,490
HRA Refunding Bonds of 2009A 2012 2.50-3.00% 3,235 1,195
Assess debt with govt commit
G.O. Bonds of 2003D 2014 1.75-4.00% 4,305 500
G.O. Revolving Bonds of 2005A 2015 3.25-3.55% 2,390 1,060
G.O. Revolving Bonds of 2005B 2013 3.50-3.60% 2,690 2,090
G.O. Revolving Bonds of 2008B 2023 3.50-4.50% 1,845 1,550
G.O. Revolving Bonds of 2010A 2025 2.00-4.00% 1,190 1,125
G.O. Revolving Bonds of 2011D 2025 2.00-2.63% 1,805 1,805
Total Governmental Activity 54,275 36,505
Business Type Activitiy
G.O. Water &Sewer Bonds 2011A 2020 .50-3.80% 1,260 1,135
G.O. bonds 2011B 2020 2.50-3.00% 3,320 2,990
Total Business Type Activity 4,580 4,125
Total $ 58,855 $ 40,630
85
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 10-Long Term Debt (Continued)
Annual debt service requirements to maturity for governmental activity bonds (in thousands of dollars)
are as follows:
Assessment
Debt with Govt
Years Commitment
Ending G.O.Bonds Lease Revenue Bonds Improv Bonds Total
12/31 Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest
2012 $ 2,400 $ 837 $ 1,260 $ 81 $ 710 $ 275 $ 4,370 $ 1,193
2013 2,360 789 65 61 2,445 251 4,870 1,101
2014 6,595 619 70 58 765 158 7,430 835
2015 1,345 462 70 56 610 134 2,025 652
2016 1,360 429 75 53 340 114 1,775 596
2017 1,295 394 80 50 355 104 1,730 548
2018 1,345 360 80 46 365 94 1,790 500
2019 945 330 85 42 375 83 1,405 455
2020 970 307 85 39 380 71 1,435 417
2021 995 276 90 35 390 59 1,475 370
2022 1,060 236 95 31 415 46 1,570 313
2023 1,120 191 100 26 425 32 1,645 249
2024 1,155 143 100 22 275 17 1,530 182
2025 1,190 93 100 17 280 9 1,570 119
2026 1,255 40 110 12 - - 1,365 52
2027 300 7 110 7 - - 410 14
2028 - - 110 3 - - 110 3
Total $25,690 $ 5,513 $ 2,685 $ 639 $ 8,130 $ 1,447 $ 36,505 $ 7,599
86
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 10—Long Term Debt (Continued)
Annual debt service requirements to maturity for business-type activity bonds (in thousands of dollars)
are as follows:
Years
Ending Revenue Bonds
12/31 Principal Interest
2012 $ 425 $ 113
2013 430 104
2014 440 95
2015 445 85
2016 455 73
2017 465 60
2018 475 46
2019 485 31
2020 505 16
Total $ 4,125 $ 623
Capital Lease
In 2008, the City entered into a new lease for financing the purchase of turn out gear for the Fire
department. The lease agreement qualifies as a capital lease for accounting purposes and, therefore, has
been recorded at the present value of their future minimum lease payments as of the inception date. This
equipment was not capitalized by the City.
The last lease obligations of$42,751 in principal and $2,101 in interest was made in 2011.
87
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 10-Long Term Debt (Continued)
Changes in Long Term Debt
Long-term debt activity for the year ended December 31, 2011, (in thousands of dollars)was as follows:
Due
Beginning Ending Within
Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year
Governmental Activity
G.O. bonds $ 23,070 $ 4,870 $ 2,250 $25,690 $ 2,400
Lease revenue bonds 3,795 - 1,110 2,685 1,260
Assess. debt with govt commit
Improvement bonds 7,000 1,805 675 8,130 710
Issuance premium/discount 154 80 42 192 -
Deferred gain 209 - 77 132 -
Total bonds 34,228 6,755 4,154 ' 36,829 4,370
Compensated absences 1,649 1,621 1,544 1,726 863
Capital lease 43 - 43 - -
Total $ 35,920 $ 8,376 $ 5,741 $38,555 $ 5,233
Business Type Activity
Revenue bonds $ - $ 4,580 $ 455 $ 4,125 $ 425
Issuance premium/discount - 158 12 146 -
Total bonds - 4,738 467 4,271 425
Compensated absences 219 230 216 233 117
Total $ 219 $ 4,968 $ 683 $ 4,504 $ 542
For the governmental activities, the capital lease is generally paid with unassigned fund balances within
the General fund. Compensated absences will be paid out of the Internal Service fund.
There are a number of limitations and restrictions contained in the various bond indentures. The City is
in compliance with all significant limitations and restrictions. Call provisions are applicable to certain
general obligation and special assessment bond issues.
88
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 10—Long Term Debt (Continued)
Changes in Long Term Debt
During 2011 the City issued $4,455,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds 2011C to provide for the redemption of
the G.O. Bonds 2006A. The refunding reduced total debt payment by $250,586 and resulted in an
economic gain of$230,849.
The proceeds of the crossover refunding were placed in an irrevocable escrow account and were used to
purchase U.S. government securities. The escrow account investments will provide the resources to
cover principal and interest payments on the refunding bonds until the crossover date. The refunding
bonds cross over on the dates the refunded bonds are callable. Until the crossover dates, both the
refunded and refunding bonds will be reported in the financial statements.
Escrow
Crossover Principal to Deposit
Issue to be Refunded Date be Refunded at 12/31/11
G.O. Bonds 2006A 01/01/2014 $ 4,295,000 $ 4,428,346
The City also issued$1,805,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds 2011D to provide for the redemption of the G.O.
Bonds 2005B. The refunding reduced total debt payment by$134,855 and resulted in an economic gain
of$114,830.
The proceeds of the crossover refunding were placed in an irrevocable escrow account and were used to
purchase U.S. government securities. The escrow account investments will provide the resources to
cover principal and interest payments on the refunding bonds until the crossover date. The refunding
bonds cross over on the dates the refunded bonds are callable. Until the crossover dates, both the
refunded and refunding bonds will be reported in the financial statements.
Escrow
Crossover Principal to Deposit
Issue to be Refunded Date be Refunded at 12/31/11
G.O. Bonds 2005B 12/1/2013 $ 1,730,000 $ 1,809,793
89
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 11—Risk Financing and Related Insurance Issues
The City is exposed to various risk of loss related to torts; thefts of, damage to and destruction of assets;
errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. In order to protect against these risks
of loss, the City purchases commercial insurance through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust, a public entity risk pool, for property insurance and workers compensation. This pool currently
operates as a common risk management and insurance program for municipal entities. The City pays an
annual premium to the League for its insurance coverage. The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust is self-sustaining through commercial companies for excess claims. The City is covered through
the pool for any claims incurred but unreported, however, retains risk for the deductible portion of its
insurance policies. The amount of these deductibles is considered immaterial to the financial statements.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, these were no significant reductions in insurance coverage
from the prior year. Settled claims have not exceeded the City's commercial coverage in any of the past
three years.
Note 12—Contingencies
The City has been named in various legal actions. At the present time, there is no significant litigation
pending that would cause a material effect on the financial statements if unfavorable rulings would
result. While it is not possible to provide any probability of success or estimate of potential loss in
defending any of these legal actions, the City expects to contest the allegations vigorously and does not
believe these actions will have a material effect on the financial statements.
A potential claim may be asserted against the City arising out of its membership in the Western Area
Firing Training Academy (WAFTA). WAFTA is a joint powers entity consisting of 11 member cities
that was formed in 1974 to purchase property to be used and operated as a fire training facility. In the
late 1980's, WAFTA became aware that the site was contaminated. Since that time, WAFTA has been
working with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) and other responsible parties to address
the contamination issues on the site. At this time, there is not an estimated dollar amount of the cost to
remediate the site nor has a claim been asserted against WAFTA or the City.
Note 13—Contract Commitments
At December 31,2011,the City had commitments on various construction projects. These commitments
totaled approximately$ 179,151.
90
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 14—Conduit Debt Obligations
From time to time, the City has issued Industrial Revenue and Housing bonds to provide financial
assistance to private-sector entities for the acquisition and construction of industrial and commercial
facilities deemed to be in the public interest. The bonds are secured by the property financed and are
payable solely from payments received on the underlying mortgage loans. Upon repayment of the bonds,
ownership of the acquired facilities transfers to the private-sector entity served by the bond issuance.
Neither the City, the State, nor any political subdivision thereof is obligated in any manner for
repayment of the bonds. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying
financial statements. As of December 31, 2011, there were 40 series of Industrial Revenue Bonds
outstanding,with outstanding balances of$162,065,101.
Note 15—Subsequent Events
On February 21, 2012 the City issued General Obligation Crossover Refunding Bonds Series 2012A for
$5,110,000. These bonds refinanced the General Obligation Bonds Series 2005C which were issued to
finance park improvements. The refunding reduced total debt payments by $651,406 and resulted in an
economic gain of $551,320. The proceeds of the crossover refunding were placed in an irrevocable
escrow account and were used to purchase U.S. government securities. The escrow account investments
will provide the resources to cover principal and interest payments on the refunding bonds until the
crossover date. The refunding bonds cross over on the dates the refunded bonds are callable. Until the
crossover dates,both the refunding and refunding bonds will be reported in the financial statements.
On February 21, 2012 the City issued General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Crossover
Refunding Bonds Series 2012B for $3,170,000. These bonds refinanced the General Obligation Bonds
Series 2006B which were issued to finance Fire Station#4. The refunding reduced total debt payments by
$304,967 and resulted in an economic gain of$255,092. The proceeds of the crossover refunding were
placed in an irrevocable escrow account and were used to purchase U.S. government securities. The
escrow account investments will provide the resources to cover principal and interest payments on the
refunding bonds until the crossover date. The refunding bonds cross over on the dates the refunded
bonds are callable. Until the crossover dates,both the refunding and refunding bonds will be reported in
the financial statements.
On February 21, 2012 the City authorized the financing of 98 sets of protective equipment and cleaning
service through a five year lease with an interest rate of 2.56%. Payments are made yearly in April.
91
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 16—Fund Balance Classification
At December 31,2011, a summary of the governmental fund balance classifications are as follows:
General General
Obligation Obligation
Innprov. Innprov. Capital Public Flying Other
Revolving Bonds Improvement Improvement Cloud Govt
General 2005B 2003D Maintenance Construction Drive Funds Total
Nonspendable:
Prepaid items $ 18,266 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,452 $ 28,718
Land held for resale - - - - - - 801,699 801,699
Total Nonspendable 18,266 - - 812,151 830,417
Restricted for:
Debt service - 2,056,160 - - - - 8,424,405 10,480,565
Special assessments - - - - - 371,559 55,996 427,555
BRA - - - - - - 858 858
Cemetary - - - - - - 140,348 140,348
Recycling - - - - - - 13,285 13,285
Law enforcement - - - - - - 170,068 170,068
E-911 - - - - - - 198,441 198,441
Park dedication fees - - - - - - 349,335 349,335
Tax increment - - - - - - 2,628,596 2,628,596
Parks referendum - - - - - - 852,648 852,648
2,056,160 - - 371,559 12,833,980 15,261,699
Assigned to:
Capital projects - - - 8,308,669 - - 471,997 8,780,666
Improvement projects - - - - - 32,174 9,138,246 9,170,420
Total Assigned - _ - - 8,308,669 - 32,174 9,610,243 17,951,086
Unassigned:
Budget stabilization 5,751,776 - - - - - - 5,751,776
Working capital 15,252,553 - - - - - - 15,252,553
Encumbrances 157,794 - (472,650) - (2,965,129) - (249,806) (3,529,791)
Total Unassigned 21,162,123 - (472,650) - (2,965,129) - (249,806) 17,474,538
Note 17—Change in Accounting Principle
GASB Statement 54 "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions" enhances the
usefulness of fund balance information by providing clearer fund balance classifications that can be
more consistently applied and by clarifying the existing governmental fund type definitions. Changes to
the government fund type fund balance reporting is reflected in the financial statements and schedules
and related disclosures are included in Note 1 and Note 16.
The implementation of GASB Statement 54 resulted in the reclassification of fund balances on the
governmental fund statement to correspond with the new fund naming structure required by this
statement. In addition certain funds were restated on the City's financial statements. Due to this
statement, some funds previously classified as Special Revenue funds were reclassified as Capital Project
funds.
92
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 18—Prior Period Adjustment
Prior period adjustments were made to correct capital asset balances for distribution lines. The City will
measure the distribution lines based on GIS instead of As-builts. The effect of the adjustment increased
capital assets and net assets by$7,216,121.
93
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Required Supplemental Information
Modified Approach for Infrastructure Assets
Condition Rating of the City's Street System
Average
PCI
2010 81.10%
2007 81.30%
2004 80.40%
2001 80.50%
1998 84.90%
Comparison of Needed-to-Actual Maintenance/Preservation
2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Budget $ 2,304,079 $ 2,280,000 $ 2,190,000 $ 2,080,000 $ 1,795,000
Actual 1,711,894 1,960,670 2,187,455 1,581,724 1,312,279
Difference $ (592,185) $ (319,330) $ (2,545) $ (498,276) $ (482,721)
The condition of road pavement is measured using Good Pointe's Icon pavement management system.
Each of the pavements in the City of Eden Prairie was visually inspected using the Paver-based Pavement
Condition Index (PCI) methodology. The methodology is based on a numeric rating system ranging
from 100 for a newly surfaced pavement to 0 for a failed pavement. The condition index is used to
classify roads in excellent condition (85-100), very good condition (70-84), good condition (55-69), fair
condition (40-54), poor condition (25-39), very poor condition (10-24) and failed condition (0-9). It is
the City's policy to maintain an average PCI of 60 percent.
94
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Required Supplemental Information
Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan
Schedule of Funding Progress
Unfunded Unfunded
Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Liability
Fiscal Valuation Accrued Value of Accrued Funded Covered as a % of
Year Ended Date Liability Plan Assets Liability Ratio Payroll Payroll
12/31/08 1/1/08 $ 1,781,809 $ - $ 1,781,809 0.0% $ 16,945,552 10.5%
12/31/09 1/1/08 1,781,809 - 1,781,809 0.0% 16,945,552 10.5%
12/31/10 1/1/10 2,438,910 - 2,438,910 0.0% 17,127,274 14.2%
12/31/11 1/1/10 2,438,910 - 2,438,910 0.0% 17,127,274 14.2%
95
Combining & Individual
Fund Statements &
Schedules
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Special Revenue Funds
Special revenue funds are used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that
are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes other than debt service or capital
projects.
Housing Redevelopment Authority(HRA Grant) - This fund accounts for monies received under Title
I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and other related housing activities.
Pleasant Hills Cemetery - This fund accounts for the current operations of the City cemetery including
maintenance costs and lot sales.
Heritage Preservation Grant - This fund was established to account for a federal grant awarded to the
City by the Minnesota Historical Society. The grant award is restricted to expenditure on evaluation and
survey work on historic and prehistoric sites within Eden Prairie.
Recycling - This fund accounts for monies received from Hennepin County's household waste rebate
programs. All dollars received are to be refunded to eligible households within Eden Prairie.
Fire Fighters - This fund accounts for donations and other collections to be used for Fire Department
activities.
97
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Debt Service Funds
Debt service funds are used to account for all financial resources that are restricted, committed, or
assigned to expenditures for principal and interest.
HRA Lease Revenue 2002 - This fund accounts for the refunding of the HRA Lease Revenue Bonds of
1992 (Rink Addition) and the HRA Lease Revenue Bonds of 1993 (City Center).
General Obligation Park Refunding 2003 - This fund accounts for the refunding of the G.O. Park
Bonds which accounted for the accumulation of tax revenues needed to repay bonds issued to finance
major park development and park improvement projects within the City.
Open Space Refunding 2003 - This fund accounts for the refunding of the 1994 G.O. Open Space
Bonds which accounted for the accumulation of tax revenues needed to repay bonds issued to finance
the acquisition of land for the City's preservation program.
General Obligation Improvement Revolving 2005A - This fund is used to account for the
accumulation of tax revenues needed to repay bonds issued to pay the construction projects for the ADC
project.
General Obligation Bonds 2005C - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of tax revenues
needed to repay bonds issued to pay the construction projects for various trails, park improvements and
the community center.
General Obligation Bonds 2006A - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of tax revenues
needed to repay bonds issued to pay the construction projects for various trails, park improvements and
the community center.
General Obligation Bonds 2006B - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of tax revenues
needed to repay bonds issued to pay the construction projects for the new Fire station.
General Obligation Bonds 2006C - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of tax revenues
needed to repay bonds issued to finance various fire vehicles and upgrades to the communications
control room.
98
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Debt Service Funds (Continued)
3rd Rink Lease Revenue Bonds 2007A - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of tax
revenues needed to repay bonds issued to pay the construction projects for the 3rd Sheet of Ice at the
community center.
Capital Equipment Notes 2008A - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of tax revenues
needed to repay certificates issued to finance the 20/40/15 project, regional radio conversion project and
two fire trucks.
General Obligation Bonds 2008B - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources
needed to repay bonds issued to finance the construction of streets, lateral utilities, and drainage for the
Flying Cloud Drive construction project. The primary sources of repayment on these bonds are special
assessments levied on benefited properties.
Capital Equipment Notes 2009B - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of tax revenues
needed to repay certificates issued to finance the 20/40/15 project and the regional radio conversion
project.
CIP Refunding Bonds 2009C - This fund accounts for the refunding of the HRA Lease Revenue Facility
Bonds for the Fire Station.
General Obligation Improvement Bonds 2010A - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of
tax revenues needed to repay bonds issued to pay the construction costs for the Singletree Lane project.
General Obligation Improvement Bonds 2011B - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of
tax revenues needed to repay bonds issued to finance the Self Contained Breathing Apparatus Gear for
the fire department.
General Obligation Refunding 2011C - This fund accounts for the refunding of the G.O. Park
Referendum Bonds which accounted for the accumulation of tax revenues needed to repay bonds issued
to finance construction projects for various trails,park improvements and the community center.
General Obligation Refunding 2011D - This fund accounts for the refunding of the G.O. Improvement
Revolving Bonds which accounted for the accumulation of tax revenues needed to repay bonds issued to
finance the construction at 212 and Charleston Road.
99
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Capital Projects Funds
Capital projects funds are used to account for all financial resources that are restricted, committed, or
assigned to expenditures for capital outlay.
Police - This fund accounts for all confiscated money, and / or property obtained through drug-related
criminal arrests and compliance fines. The funds are earmarked for expenditures on law enforcement
operations.
E-911 - This fund accounts for monies received from the State of Minnesota to be used for the E-911
emergency system.
Senior Board- This fund was established to account for monies received for Senior Awareness Week.
Park Improvement - This fund accounts for the park dedication fees, grants, and other contributions
earmarked for expenditure on park acquisition and development.
CIP Trails - This fund accounts for the accumulation of resources to be used for capital improvements
and maintenance of City trails.
CIP Pavement Management - This fund accounts for the accumulation of resources to be used for
capital improvements and maintenance of City streets.
Economic Development - This fund accounts for money set aside to assist in the redevelopment of the
City.
Project - This fund accounts for tax increment revenue set aside to assist in the redevelopment of the
City.
Parks Referendum - This fund accounts for the construction projects at the various city parks which
were approved with the park referendum.
Trails Referendum - This fund accounts for the construction projects on the various city trails which
were approved with the park referendum.
Sprint / Nextel - This fund accounts for contributions from Sprint for the transition of the City's radio
system.
HRA - This fund accounts for the accumulation of resources to be used for economic development
projects.
100
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Capital Projects Funds (Continued)
Transportation - This fund accounts for proceeds of state aid. This revenue is used to finance street
improvements.
Shady Oak Road North - This fund accounts for the accumulation of resources to be used for the
reconstruction of Shady Oak Road from Rowland Road through Highway 62 interchange.
Shady Oak Road South - This fund accounts for the accumulation of resources to be used for the
reconstruction of Shady Oak Road from Flying Cloud Drive to Rowland Road.
io1
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Permanent Funds
Permanent funds are used to account for resources that are restricted to the extent that only earnings,
and not principal, may be used for purposes that support the City's programs that is, for the benefit of
the City or its citizens.
Historical and Cultural - This fund was established to account for estate monies willed to the City for
preservation and maintenance of the Cummins-Grill House. The fund also accumulates revenue from
the sale of a book on Eden Prairie's 100-year history. The book was donated to the City by the Eden
Prairie Historical Society, with revenues earmarked for expenditure on the preservation of the history of
Eden Prairie.
Cemetery Perpetual Care - This fund was established to account for funds dedicated for cemetery
maintenance in accordance with state statutes.
102
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 1 of 8
Special Revenue
Pleasant Heritage
HRA Hills Preservation Fire
Grant Cemetery Grant Recycling Fighters Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ - $ 6,707 $ - $ 15,248 $ - $ 21,955
Receivables:
Interest - 23 - - - 23
Due from other governments 124,345 - - - - 124,345
Unremitted taxes - - - - - -
Deferred special assessments - - - - - -
Due from other funds - - - - - -
Prepaid items 130 - - - - 130
Land Held for Resale - - - - - -
Cash and investments with escrow agent - - - - - -
Total assets $ 124,475 $ 6,730 $ - $ 15,248 $ - $ 146,453
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable $ 81,379 $ 361 $ - $ 1,963 $ - $ 83,703
Salaries payable 704 - - - - 704
Interest payable - - - - - -
Due to other governments - - - - - -
Due to other funds 41,404 - - - - 41,404
Unearned revenue - - - - - -
Deferred revenue - - - - -Total liabilities 123,487 361 - 1,963 - 125,811
Fund balances:
Nonspendable 130 - - - - 130
Restricted 858 6,369 - 13,285 - 20,512
Assigned - - - - - -
Unassigned - - - - - -
Total fund balances 988 6,369 - 13,285 - 20,642
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 124,475 $ 6,730 $ - $ 15,248 $ - $ 146,453
103
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 2 of 8
Debt Service
General General
HRA Obligation Open Obligation General General
Lease Park Space Improv. Obligation Obligation
Revenue Refunding Refunding Revolving Bonds Bonds
2002 2003 2003 2005A 2005C 2006A
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 1,266,581 $ 270,608 $ 160,677 $ 3,933 $ 292,500 $ 366,882
Receivables:
Interest 3,396 45 113 125 475 917
Due from other governments - - - - - -
Unremitted taxes - 1,106 509 234 543 2,090
Deferred special assessments - - - 676,143 - -
Due from other funds - - - - - 495,534
Prepaid items - - - - 400 -
Land Held for Resale - - - - - -
Cash and investments with escrow agent - - - - - 4,287,132
Total assets $ 1,269,977 $ 271,759 $ 161,299 $ 680,435 $ 293,918 $ 5,152,555
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Salaries payable - - - - - -
Interest payable - - - - - -
Due to other governments - - - - - -
Due to other funds - - - - - -
Unearned revenue - - - - - -
Deferred revenue - - - 676,143 -Total liabilities - - - 676,143 - -
Fund balances:
Nonspendable - - - - 400 -
Restricted 1,269,977 271,759 161,299 4,292 293,518 5,152,555
Assigned - - - - - -
Unassigned - - - - - -
Total fund balances 1,269,977 271,759 161,299 4,292 293,918 5,152,555
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 1,269,977 $ 271,759 $ 161,299 $ 680,435 $ 293,918 $ 5,152,555
104
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 3 of 8
Debt Service
3rd Rink
General General Lease Capital General Capital
Obligation Obligation Revenue Equip Obligation Equip
Bonds Bonds Bonds Notes Bonds Notes
2006B 2006C 2007A 2008A 2008B 2009B
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 368,868 $ 275,582 $ 665 $ - $ 765 $ 135,081
Receivables:
Interest 419 317 249 - - 408
Due from other governments - - - - - -
Unremitted taxes 763 548 - 847 - 713
Deferred special assessments - - - - - -
Due from other funds - - - - - -
Prepaid items - - - - - -
Land Held for Resale - - - - - -
Cash and investments with escrow agent - - 97,185 - - -
Total assets $ 370,050 $ 276,447 $ 98,099 $ 847 $ 765 $ 136,202
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Salaries payable - - - - - -
Interest payable - - - 238 45 -
Due to other governments - - - - - -
Due to other funds - - - 24,231 - -
Unearned revenue - - - - - -
Deferred revenue - - - - -Total liabilities - - - 24,469 45 -
Fund balances:
Nonspendable - - - - - -
Restricted 370,050 276,447 98,099 - 720 136,202
Assigned - - - - - -
Unassigned - - - (23,622) - -
Total fund balances 370,050 276,447 98,099 (23,622) 720 136,202
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 370,050 $ 276,447 $ 98,099 $ 847 $ 765 $ 136,202
105
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 4 of 8
Debt Service
General General General
CIP Obligation General Obligation Obligation
Refunding Improvement Obligation Refunding Refunding
Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds
2009C 2010A 2011B 2011C 2011D Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 115,558 $ 31,239 $ 20,590 $ - $ - $ 3,309,529
Receivables:
Interest 419 68 45 - - 6,996
Due from other governments - - - - - -
Unremitted taxes 679 - - - - 8,032
Deferred special assessments - 1,056,616 - - - 1,732,759
Due from other funds - - - - - 495,534
Prepaid items - - - - - 400
Land Held for Resale - - - - - -
Cash and investments with escrow agent - - - 141,214 79,675 4,605,206
Total assets $ 116,656 $ 1,087,923 $ 20,635 $ 141,214 $ 79,675 $ 10,158,456
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Salaries payable - - - - - -
Interest payable - - - - - 283
Due to other governments - - - - - -
Due to other funds - - - - - 24,231
Unearned revenue - - - - - -
Deferred revenue - 1,056,616 - - - 1,732,759
Total liabilities - 1,056,616 - - - 1,757,273
Fund balances:
Nonspendable - - - - - 400
Restricted 116,656 31,307 20,635 141,214 79,675 8,424,405
Assigned - - - - - -
Unassigned - - - - - (23,622)
Total fund balances 116,656 31,307 20,635 141,214 79,675 8,401,183
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 116,656 $ 1,087,923 $ 20,635 $ 141,214 $ 79,675 $ 10,158,456
106
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 5 of 8
Capital Projects
Senior Park CIP
Police E-911 Board Improvement Trails
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 219,358 $ 290,920 $ 11,627 $ 2,385,544 $ -
Receivables:
Interest 522 679 34 5,286 521
Due from other governments - 13,268 - - -
Unremitted taxes - - - - -
Deferred special assessments - - - - 225,000
Due from other funds - - - - -
Prepaid items - 9,922 - - -
Land Held for Resale - - - - -
Cash and investments with escrow agent - - - - -
Total assets $ 219,880 $ 314,789 $ 11,661 $ 2,390,830 $ 225,521
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable $ 7,567 $ 18,908 $ 67 $ 1,593 $ -
Salaries payable 1,594 - - - -
Interest payable - - - - -
Due to other governments - 12,691 - - -
Due to other funds - - - - 17,227
Unearned revenue - - - 331,036 -
Deferred revenue - - - - 225,000
Total liabilities 9,161 31,599 67 332,629 242,227
Fund balances:
Nonspendable - 9,922 - - -
Restricted 170,068 198,441 - 349,335 -
Assigned 40,651 74,827 11,594 1,708,866 -
Unassigned - - - - (16,706)
Total fund balances 210,719 283,190 11,594 2,058,201 (16,706)
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 219,880 $ 314,789 $ 11,661 $ 2,390,830 $ 225,521
107
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 6 of 8
Capital Projects
CIP Economic
Pavement Development Project Parks Trails
Management Fund Fund Referendum Referendum
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 1,848,545 $ 3,866,928 $ 3,976,673 $ 793,824 $ 133,476
Receivables:
Interest 6,418 9,022 9,893 - -
Due from other governments - - - - -
Unremitted taxes - - - - -
Deferred special assessments - - - - -
Due from other funds - - 268,109 - -
Prepaid items - - - - -
Land Held for Resale - 801,699 - - -
Cash and investments with escrow agent - - - - -
Total assets $ 1,854,963 $ 4,677,649 $ 4,254,675 $ 793,824 $ 133,476
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable $ - $ 3,200 $ 188 $ 59,779 $ 14,873
Salaries payable - - - - -
Interest payable - - - - -
Due to other governments - - 134,076 - -
Due to other funds - - - - -
Unearned revenue - - - - -
Deferred revenue - - - -Total liabilities - 3,200 134,264 59,779 14,873
Fund balances:
Nonspendable - 801,699 - - -
Restricted - - 2,628,596 734,045 118,603
Assigned 1,854,963 3,872,750 1,491,815 - -
Unassigned - - - - -
Total fund balances 1,854,963 4,674,449 4,120,411 734,045 118,603
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 1,854,963 $ 4,677,649 $ 4,254,675 $ 793,824 $ 133,476
108
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 7 of 8
Capital Projects
Shady Oak Shady Oak
Sprint/ Road Road
Nextel HRA Transportation North South Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ - $ 221,680 $ 265,146 $ - $ - $ 14,013,721
Receivables:
Interest - 374 702 - - 33,451
Due from other governments - - - - - 13,268
Unremitted taxes - 752 - - - 752
Deferred special assessments - - 142,894 - - 367,894
Due from other funds - - - - - 268,109
Prepaid items - - - - - 9,922
Land Held for Resale - - - - - 801,699
Cash and investments with escrow agent - - - - - -
Total assets $ - $ 222,806 $ 408,742 $ - $ - $ 15,508,816
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106,175
Salaries payable - 4,423 - - - 6,017
Interest payable - - - - - -
Due to other governments - - - - - 146,767
Due to other funds 46,590 - - 159,276 3,612 226,705
Unearned revenue - - - - - 331,036
Deferred revenue - - 142,894 - - 367,894
Total liabilities 46,590 4,423 142,894 159,276 3,612 1,184,594
Fund balances:
Nonspendable - - - - - 811,621
Restricted - - 55,996 - - 4,255,084
Assigned - 218,383 209,852 - - 9,483,701
Unassigned (46,590) - - (159,276) (3,612) (226,184)
Total fund balances (46,590) 218,383 265,848 (159,276) (3,612) 14,324,222
Total liabilities and fund balance $ - $ 222,806 $ 408,742 $ - $ - $ 15,508,816
109
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 8 of 8
Permanent Fund
Cemetery Total
Historical Perpetual Nonmajor
and Care Governmental
Cultural Fund Total Funds
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 7,553 $ 252,345 $ 259,898 $ 17,605,103
Receivables:
Interest 23 600 623 41,093
Due from other governments - - - 137,613
Unremitted taxes - - - 8,784
Deferred special assessments - - - 2,100,653
Due from other funds - - - 763,643
Prepaid items - - - 10,452
Land Held for Resale - - - 801,699
Cash and investments with escrow agent - - - 4,605,206
Total assets $ 7,576 $ 252,945 $ 260,521 $ 26,074,246
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable $ - $ - $ - $ 189,878
Salaries payable - - - 6,721
Interest payable - - - 283
Due to other governments - - - 146,767
Due to other funds - - - 292,340
Unearned revenue - - - 331,036
Deferred revenue - - - 2,100,653
Total liabilities - - - 3,067,678
Fund balances:
Nonspendable - - - 812,151
Restricted - 133,979 133,979 12,833,980
Assigned 7,576 118,966 126,542 9,610,243
Unassigned - - - (249,806)
Total fund balances 7,576 252,945 260,521 23,006,568
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 7,576 $ 252,945 $ 260,521 $ 26,074,246
110
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Page 1 of 8
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Special Revenue
Pleasant Heritage
HRA Hills Preservation Fire
Grant Cemetery Grant Recycling Fighters Total
REVENUES
General property taxes $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Special assessments - - - - - -
Intergovernmental revenue
Other grants 422,102 - - 154,302 - 576,404
Fines and forfeits - - - - - -
Investment income - 59 - - 118 177
Other revenue
Fees - 7,250 - - - 7,250
Contributions and donations - - - - - -
Miscellaneous - - - - - -
Total revenues 422,102 7,309 - 154,302 118 583,831
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government 424,054 - - - - 424,054
Public safety - - - - - -
Public works - - - 151,856 - 151,856
Parks and recreation - 9,926 - - - 9,926
Interest on interfund borrowing - - - 323 - 323
Capital outlay:
Public safety - - - - - -
Public works - - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - - - -
Debt service:
Principal - - - - - -
Interest - - - - - -
Bond issuance cost - - - - - -
Fiscal agent fees - - - - - -
Total expenditures 424,054 9,926 - 152,179 - 586,159
Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (1,952) (2,617) - 2,123 118 (2,328)
Other financing sources(uses):
Issuance of debt - - - - - -
Issuance of refunding bonds - - - - - -
Premiums - - - - - -
Transfers in - - - - - -
Transfers out - - (5,193) - (16,883) (22,076)
Total other financing sources(uses) - - (5,193) - (16,883) (22,076)
Net change in fund balances (1,952) (2,617) (5,193) 2,123 (16,765) (24,404)
Fund balances(deficit)-January 1 2,940 8,986 5,193 11,162 16,765 45,046
Fund balances(deficit)-December 31 $ 988 $ 6,369 $ - $ 13,285 $ - $ 20,642
111
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Page 2 of 8
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Debt Service
General General
HRA Obligation Open Obligation General General
Lease Park Space Improv. Obligation Obligation
Revenue Refunding Refunding Revolving Bonds Bonds
2002 2003 2003 2005A 2005C 2006A
REVENUES
General property taxes $ - $ 431,501 $ 198,391 $ 106,118 $ 211,586 $ 815,088
Special assessments - - - 200,732 - -
Intergovernmental revenue
Other grants - - - - - -
Fines and forfeits - - - - - -
Investment income 1,935 248 296 487 1,212 2,529
Other revenue
Fees - - - - - -
Contributions and donations - - - - - -
Miscellaneous - - - - - -
Total revenues 1,935 431,749 198,687 307,337 212,798 817,617
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government - - - - - -
Public safety - - - - - -
Public works - - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - - - -
Interest on interfund borrowing - - - - - -
Capital outlay:
Public safety - - - - - -
Public works - - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - - - -
Debt service:
Principal 1,050,000 390,000 165,000 245,000 - 525,000
Interest 48,975 19,248 23,728 45,815 203,145 253,963
Bond issuance cost - - - - - 53,535
Fiscal agent fees - 431 431 350 400 400
Total expenditures 1,098,975 409,679 189,159 291,165 203,545 832,898
Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (1,097,040) 22,070 9,528 16,172 9,253 (15,281)
Other financing sources(uses):
Issuance of debt - - - - - -
Issuance of refunding bonds - - - - - 4,313,786
Premiums - - - - - 26,880
Transfers in 219,000 - - - - -
Transfers out - - - - - -
Total other financing sources(uses) 219,000 - - - - 4,340,666
Net change in fund balances (878,040) 22,070 9,528 16,172 9,253 4,325,385
Fund balances(deficit)-January 1 2,148,017 249,689 151,771 (11,880) 284,665 827,170
Fund balances(deficit)-December 31 $ 1,269,977 $ 271,759 $ 161,299 $ 4,292 $ 293,918 $ 5,152,555
112
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Page 3 of 8
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Debt Service
3rd Rink
General General Lease Capital General Capital
Obligation Obligation Revenue Equip Obligation Equip
Bonds Bonds Bonds Notes Bonds Notes
2006B 2006C 2007A 2008A 2008B 2009B
REVENUES
General property taxes $ 345,613 $ 248,257 $ - $ 383,582 $ - $ 322,953
Special assessments - - - - - -
Intergovernmental revenue
Other grants - - - - - -
Fines and forfeits - - - - -Investment income 1,128 829 620 - - 807
Other revenue
Fees - - - - - -
Contributions and donations - - - - - -
Miscellaneous - - - - - -
Total revenues 346,741 249,086 620 383,582 - 323,760
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government - - - - - -
Public safety - - - - - -
Public works - - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - - - -
Interest on interfund borrowing - - - 524 119 -
Capital outlay:
Public safety - - - - - -
Public works - - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - - - -
Debt service:
Principal 160,000 225,000 60,000 285,000 105,000 230,000
Interest 167,970 14,769 65,450 88,193 68,785 65,550
Bond issuance cost - - - - - -
Fiscal agent fees 400 375 2,150 400 400 400
Total expenditures 328,370 240,144 127,600 374,117 174,304 295,950
Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures 18,371 8,942 (126,980) 9,465 (174,304) 27,810
Other financing sources(uses):
Issuance of debt - - - - - -
Issuance of refunding bonds - - - - - -
Premiums - - - - - -
Transfers in - - 130,000 - 175,000 -
Transfers out - - - - - -
Totalotherfinancingsources(uses) - - 130,000 - 175,000 -
Net change in fund balances 18,371 8,942 3,020 9,465 696 27,810
Fund balances(deficit)-January 1 351,679 267,505 95,079 (33,087) 24 108,392
Fund balances(deficit)-December 31 $ 370,050 $ 276,447 $ 98,099 $ (23,622)$ 720 $ 136,202
113
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Page 4 of 8
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Debt Service
General General General
CIP Obligation General Obligation Obligation
Refunding Improvement Obligation Refunding Refunding
Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds
2009C 2010A 2011B 2011C 2011D Total
REVENUES
General property taxes $ 307,644 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,370,733
Special assessments - 144,821 - - - 345,553
Intergovernmental revenue
Other grants - - - - - -
Fines and forfeits - - - - -Investment income 1,064 371 247 - - 11,773
Other revenue
Fees - - - - - -
Contributions and donations - - - - - -
Miscellaneous - - - - - -
Total revenues 308,708 145,192 247 - - 3,728,059
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government - - - - - -
Public safety - - - - - -
Public works - - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - - - -
Interest on interfund borrowing - - - - - 643
Capital outlay:
Public safety - - - - - -
Public works - - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - - - -
Debt service:
Principal 270,000 65,000 - - - 3,775,000
Interest 31,125 37,935 7,625 - - 1,142,276
Bond issuance cost - 6,200 (191) - - 59,544
Fiscal agent fees 400 400 58 - - 6,995
Total expenditures 301,525 109,535 7,492 - - 4,984,458
Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures 7,183 35,657 (7,245) - - (1,256,399)
Other financing sources(uses):
Issuance of debt - - 27,880 - - 27,880
Issuance of refunding bonds - - - 141,214 79,675 4,534,675
Premiums - - - - - 26,880
Transfers in - - - - - 524,000
Transfers out - - - - - -
Total other financing sources(uses) - - 27,880 141,214 79,675 5,113,435
Net change in fund balances 7,183 35,657 20,635 141,214 79,675 3,857,036
Fund balances(deficit)-January 1 109,473 (4,350) - - - 4,544,147
Fund balances(deficit)-December 31 $ 116,656 S 31,307 $ 20,635 S 141,214 $ 79,675 $ 8,401,183
114
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Page 5 of 8
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Capital Projects
Senior Park CIP
Police E-911 Board Improvement Trails
REVENUES
General property taxes $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Special assessments - - - - -
Intergovernmental revenue
Other grants - 79,605 - 85,382 -
Fines and forfeits 2,650 - - - -
Investment income 1,264 1,776 55 13,729 1,362
Other revenue
Fees - - - 195,000 -
Contributions and donations - - 6,130 24,051 75,000
Miscellaneous 22,804 - - - -
Total revenues 26,718 81,381 6,185 318,162 76,362
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government - - - - -
Public safety 22,993 62,642 - - -
Public works - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - 6,713 - -
Interest on interfund borrowing - - - - -
Capital outlay:
Public safety - 18,253 - - -
Public works - - - - 336,679
Parks and recreation - - - 244,968 -
Debt service:
Principal - - - - -
Interest - - - - -
Bond issuance cost - - - - -
Fiscal agent fees - - - - -
Total expenditures 22,993 80,895 6,713 244,968 336,679
Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures 3,725 486 (528) 73,194 (260,317)
Other financing sources(uses):
Issuance of debt - - - - -
Issuance of refunding bonds - - - - -
Premiums - - - - -
Transfers in - - - 30,000 220,000
Transfers out - - (2,095) - -
Total other financing sources(uses) - - (2,095) 30,000 220,000
Net change in fund balances 3,725 486 (2,623) 103,194 (40,317)
Fund balances(deficit)-January 1 206,994 282,704 14,217 1,955,007 23,611
Fund balances(deficit)-December 31 $ 210,719 $ 283,190 $ 11,594 $ 2,058,201 $ (16,706)
115
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Page 6 of 8
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Capital Projects
CIP Economic
Pavement Development Project Parks Trails
Mgmt Fund Fund Referendum Referendum
REVENUES
General property taxes $ - $ - $ 3,139,080 $ - $ -
Special assessments - - - - -
Intergovernmental revenue
Other grants - - - - -
Fines and forfeits - - - -Investment income 17,336 20,107 29,268 254 48
Other revenue
Fees - - -
Contributions and donations - - - - -
Miscellaneous - 60,958 - 18,691 -
Total revenues 17,336 81,065 3,168,348 18,945 48
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government - 12,429 2,696,988 - -
Public safety - - - - -
Public works - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - - -
Interest on interfund borrowing - - - - -
Capital outlay:
Public safety - - - - -
Public works 1,351,469 - - - 362,865
Parks and recreation - - - 1,349,617 -
Debt service:
Principal - - - - -
Interest - - - - -
Bond issuance cost - - - - -
Fiscal agent fees - - - - -
Total expenditures 1,351,469 12,429 2,696,988 1,349,617 362,865
Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (1,334,133) 68,636 471,360 (1,330,672) (362,817)
Other financing sources(uses):
Issuance of debt - - - - -
Issuance of refunding bonds - - - - -
Premiums - - - - -
Transfers in 1,662,090 2,509 - - -
Transfers out - - (404,861) - -
Total other financing sources(uses) 1,662,090 2,509 (404,861) - -
Net change in fund balances 327,957 71,145 66,499 (1,330,672) (362,817)
Fund balances(deficit)-January 1 1,527,006 4,603,304 4,053,912 2,064,717 481,420
Fund balances(deficit)-December 31 $ 1,854,963 $ 4,674,449 $ 4,120,411 $ 734,045 $ 118,603
116
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Page 7 of 8
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Capital Projects
Shady Oak Shady Oak
Sprint/ Road Road
Nextel HRA Transportation North South Total
REVENUES
General property taxes $ - $ 194,944 $ - - $ - $ 3,334,024
Special assessments - - 50,374 - - 50,374
Intergovernmental revenue
Other grants - - - - - 164,987
Fines and forfeits - - - - - 2,650
Investment income - 1,235 2,029 - - 88,463
Other revenue
Fees - - - - - 195,000
Contributions and donations - - - 50,000 - 155,181
Miscellaneous - - - - - 102,453
Total revenues - 196,179 52,403 50,000 - 4,093,132
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government - 157,352 - - - 2,866,769
Public safety - - - - - 85,635
Public works - - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - - - 6,713
Interest on interfund borrowing - - - - - -
Capital outlay:
Public safety - - - - - 18,253
Public works - - 71,003 209,276 3,612 2,334,904
Parks and recreation - - - - - 1,594,585
Debt service:
Principal - - - - - -
Interest - - - - - -
Bond issuance cost - - - - - -
Fiscal agent fees - - - - - -
Total expenditures - 157,352 71,003 209,276 3,612 6,906,859
Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures - 38,827 (18,600) (159,276) (3,612) (2,813,727)
Other financing sources(uses):
Issuance of debt - - - - - -
Issuance of refunding bonds - - - - - -
Premiums - - - - - -
Transfers in - - - - - 1,914,599
Transfers out - - - - - (406,956)
Total other financing sources(uses) - - - - - 1,507,643
Net change in fund balances - 38,827 (18,600) (159,276) (3,612) (1,306,084)
Fund balances(deficit)-January 1 (46,590) 179,556 284,448 - - 15,630,306
Fund balances(deficit)-December 31 $ (46,590)$ 218,383 $ 265,848 (159,276) $ (3,612) $ 14,324,222
117
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Page 8 of 8
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Permanent Fund
Cemetery Total
Historical Perpetual Nonmajor
and Care Governmental
Cultural Fund Total Funds
REVENUES
General property taxes $ - $ - $ - $ 6,704,757
Special assessments - - - 395,927
Intergovernmental revenue
Other grants - - - 741,391
Fines and forfeits - - - 2,650
Investment income 59 1,310 1,369 101,782
Other revenue
Fees 312 600 912 203,162
Contributions and donations - - - 155,181
Miscellaneous - - - 102,453
Total revenues 371 1,910 2,281 8,407,303
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government - - - 3,290,823
Public safety - - - 85,635
Public works - - - 151,856
Parks and recreation - - - 16,639
Interest on interfund borrowing - - - 966
Capital outlay:
Public safety - - - 18,253
Public works - - - 2,334,904
Parks and recreation - - - 1,594,585
Debt service:
Principal - - - 3,775,000
Interest - - - 1,142,276
Bond issuance cost - - - 59,544
Fiscal agent fees - - - 6,995
Total expenditures - - - 12,477,476
Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures 371 1,910 2,281 (4,070,173)
Other financing sources(uses):
Issuance of debt - - - 27,880
Issuance of refunding bonds - - - 4,534,675
Premiums - - - 26,880
Transfers in - - - 2,438,599
Transfers out - - (429,032)
Total other financing sources(uses) - - - 6,599,002
Net change in fund balances 371 1,910 2,281 2,528,829
Fund balances(deficit)-January 1 7,205 251,035 258,240 20,477,739
Fund balances(deficit)-December 31 $ 7,576 $ 252,945 $ 260,521 $ 23,006,568
118
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Internal Service Funds
Internal Service Funds
Internal service funds are used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one
department or agency to other departments or agencies of the government and to other government
units,on a cost reimbursement basis.
Health & Benefits - This fund accounts for the activities pertaining to health, dental, life and disability
insurance. This fund also accounts for the employer's portion of pension, FICA and medicare
contributions.
Severance - This fund accounts for the payment of unused personal time off for governmental fund
employees.
Workers Compensation - This fund accounts for the costs associated with workers' compensation.
Revenues are primarily charges to other funds, interest earnings and insurance checks. Expenditures
will consist of insurance premiums.
Property Insurance - This fund accounts for the costs associated with the City's property and casualty
insurance program. Revenues are primarily charges to other funds and interest earnings. Expenditures
will consist of insurance premiums.
Facilities - This fund accounts for the costs associated with maintaining city owned buildings. Revenues
are primarily charges to other funds and interest earnings.
Fleet - These funds account for the costs associated with maintaining machinery and equipment for the
City. Revenues are primarily charges to other funds and interest earnings.
Information Technology - These funds account for the costs associated with maintaining and
upgrading the network, computer infrastructure and communications service technologies that support
the City's mission-critical operations. Revenues are primarily charges to other funds and interest
earnings.
119
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS
DECEMBER 31,2011
Health& Workers Property
Benefits Severance Compensation Insurance
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and investments $ 522,028 $ 1,716,343 $ 37,698 $ 135,015
Receivables:
Accounts Receivable 15,654 - - -
Interest 1,313 4,369 - 1,166
Due from other governments - - - -
Inventory - - - -
Prepaid items 278,673 - 79,276 63,518
Total current assets 817,668 1,720,712 116,974 199,699
Non-current assets:
Capital assets
Property,plant and equipment - - - -
Less accumulated depreciation - - - -
Total noncurrent assets - - - -
Total assets $ 817,668 $ 1,720,712 $ 116,974 $ 199,699
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 96,449 $ - $ - $ -
Salaries payable - 1,678 1,933 1,933
Interest payable - - 23 -
Due to other governments 265,203 - - -
Unearned Revenue - - - -
Current portion of compensated absences - 862,927 - -
Total current liabilities 361,652 864,605 1,956 1,933
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB 599,220 - 1,820 1,820
Compensated absences - 862,926 - -
Total noncurrent liabilities 599,220 862,926 1,820 1,820
Total liabilities 960,872 1,727,531 3,776 3,753
Net assets:
Invested in capital assets - - - -
Unrestricted (143,204) (6,819) 113,198 195,946
Total net assets (143,204) (6,819) 113,198 195,946
Total liabilities and net assets $ 817,668 $ 1,720,712 $ 116,974 $ 199,699
120
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS
DECEMBER 31,2011
Information
Facilities Fleet Technology Total
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and investments $ 2,407,496 $ 1,846,705 $ 518,641 $ 7,183,926
Receivables:
Accounts Receivable 987 2,048 - 18,689
Interest 6,473 3,769 894 17,984
Due from other governments - - 2,290 2,290
Inventory - 110,133 - 110,133
Prepaid items - - 25,009 446,476
Total current assets 2,414,956 1,962,655 546,834 7,779,498
Non-current assets:
Capital assets
Property,plant and equipment 1,455,885 - - 1,455,885
Less accumulated depreciation (55,640) - - (55,640)
Total noncurrent assets 1,400,245 - - 1,400,245
Total assets $ 3,815,201 $ 1,962,655 $ 546,834 $ 9,179,743
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 281,022 $ 144,138 $ 40,341 $ 561,950
Salaries payable 24,041 14,896 20,029 64,510
Interest payable - - - 23
Due to other governments 358 911 889 267,361
Unearned Revenue 65,478 - - 65,478
Current portion of compensated absences - - - 862,927
Total current liabilities 370,899 159,945 61,259 1,822,249
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB 22,963 20,817 13,918 660,558
Compensated absences - - - 862,926
Total noncurrent liabilities 22,963 20,817 13,918 1,523,484
Total liabilities 393,862 180,762 75,177 3,345,733
Net assets:
Invested in capital assets 1,400,245 - - 1,400,245
Unrestricted 2,021,094 1,781,893 471,657 4,433,765
Total net assets 3,421,339 1,781,893 471,657 5,834,010
Total liabilities and net assets $ 3,815,201 $ 1,962,655 $ 546,834 $ 9,179,743
121
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Health& Workers Property
Benefits Severance Compensation Insurance
OPERATING REVENUE
Charges for services $ 4,484,973 $ 28,050 $ 626,085 $ 521,732
Other revenue 4,998 - 37,695 123,531
Total operating revenues 4,489,971 28,050 663,780 645,263
OPERATING EXPENSE
Cost of services
Personal services 2,530,770 196,658 63,127 63,448
Chemicals and supplies - - 331 -
Insurance 2,064,280 - 466,943 495,493
Contractual services 27,355 - 273 40
Repairs and maintenance - - - -
Disposal charges - - - -
Utilities - - - -
Depreciation - - - -
User charges - - - -
Total operating expenses 4,622,405 196,658 530,674 558,981
Operating income(loss) (132,434) (168,608) 133,106 86,282
NONOPERATING REVENUE(EXPENSE)
Investment income/(expense) 5,599 9,877 231 3,696
Gain(loss)on disposition of fixed assets - - - -
Total nonoperating revenues(expenses) 5,599 9,877 231 3,696
Income(loss)before transfers (126,835) (158,731) 133,337 89,978
Transfer out - - - (450,000)
Changes in net assets (126,835) (158,731) 133,337 (360,022)
Total net assets,January 1 (16,369) 151,912 (20,139) 555,968
Total net assets,December 31 $ (143,204) $ (6,819) $ 113,198 $ 195,946
122
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Information
Facilities Fleet Technology Total
OPERATING REVENUE
Charges for services $ 4,032,492 $ 2,289,476 $ 1,739,600 $ 13,722,408
Other revenue 1,102,562 33,200 11,035 1,313,021
Total operating revenues 5,135,054 2,322,676 1,750,635 15,035,429
OPERATING EXPENSE
Cost of services
Personal services 815,236 516,458 669,197 4,854,894
Chemicals and supplies 240,599 1,560,649 151,880 1,953,459
Insurance - - - 3,026,716
Contractual services 2,491,405 3,656 398,520 2,921,249
Repairs and maintenance 219,100 423,423 309,585 952,108
Disposal charges 48,232 4,545 - 52,777
Utilities 1,079,550 - 25,130 1,104,680
Depreciation 27,235 - - 27,235
User charges 16,030 19,284 3,404 38,718
Total operating expenses 4,937,387 2,528,015 1,557,716 14,931,836
Operating income(loss) 197,667 (205,339) 192,919 103,593
NONOPERATING REVENUE(EXPENSE)
Investment income/(expense) 26,465 9,923 (1,796) 53,995
Gain(loss)on disposition of fixed assets - 121,916 - 121,916
Total nonoperating revenues(expenses) 26,465 131,839 (1,796) 175,911
Income(loss)before transfers 224,132 (73,500) 191,123 279,504
Transfer out - - (3,804) (453,804)
Changes in net assets 224,132 (73,500) 187,319 (174,300)
Total net assets,January 1 3,197,207 1,855,393 284,338 6,008,310
Total net assets,December 31 $ 3,421,339 $ 1,781,893 $ 471,657 $ 5,834,010
123
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Health& Workers Property
Benefits Severance Compensation Insurance
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Receipts from customers $ 4,483,737 $ 28,050 $ 626,085 $ 521,732
Payments from other funds - 54,104 - -
Payments to other funds - - (54,104) -
Payments to vendors (2,377,424) - (509,497) (420,045)
Payments to employees (2,383,335) (117,644) (62,589) (62,910)
Other receipts 4,998 - 37,695 123,531
Net cash provided(used)by operating activities (272,024) (35,490) 37,590 162,308
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment income 4,935 11,254 108 3,629
Net cash provided(used)by investing activities 4,935 11,254 108 3,629
CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Transfers(out) - - - (450,000)
Net cash provided(used)by noncapital financing activities - - - (450,000)
CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition and construction of capital assets - - - -
Proceeds from sale of equipment - - - -
Net cash provided(used)by capital financing activities - - - -
Net increase(decrease)in cash and cash equivalents (267,089) (24,236) 37,698 (284,063)
Cash and cash equivalents,January 1 789,117 1,740,579 - 419,078
Cash and cash equivalents,December 31 $ 522,028 $ 1,716,343 $ 37,698 $ 135,015
124
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 1 of 2
Information
Facilities Fleet Technology Total
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Receipts from customers $ 3,994,045 $ 2,289,554 $ 1,748,818 $ 13,692,021
Payments from other funds - - - 54,104
Payments to other funds - - - (54,104)
Payments to vendors (4,136,662) (1,983,359) (903,398) (10,330,385)
Payments to employees (807,393) (513,010) (669,938) (4,616,819)
Other receipts 1,102,562 33,200 11,035 1,313,021
Net cash provided(used)by operating activities 152,552 (173,615) 186,517 57,838
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment income 23,658 10,537 (1,796) 52,325
Net cash provided(used)by investing activities 23,658 10,537 (1,796) 52,325
CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACT.
Transfers(out) - - (3,804) (453,804)
Net cash provided(used)by noncapital financing activitie - - (3,804) (453,804)
CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition and construction of capital assets (606,528) - - (606,528)
Proceeds from sale of equipment - 121,916 - 121,916
Net cash provided(used)by capital financing activities (606,528) 121,916 - (484,612)
Net increase(decrease)in cash and cash equivalents (430,318) (41,162) 180,917 (828,253)
Cash and cash equivalents,January 1 2,837,814 1,887,867 337,724 8,012,179
Cash and cash equivalents,December 31 $ 2,407,496 $ 1,846,705 $ 518,641 $ 7,183,926
125
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Health& Workers Property
Benefits Severance Compensation Insurance
RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME
(LOSS)TO NET CASH PROVIDED(USED)
BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Operating income(loss) $ (132,434) $ (168,608) $ 133,106 $ 86,282
Adjustments to reconcile operating income(loss)
to net cash provided(used)by operating activities:
Depreciation - - - -
(Increase)decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable (1,236) - - -
Due from other funds - 54,104 - -
Due from other governments - - - -
Inventory - - - -
Prepaid items (278,673) - (4,160) 75,488
Increase(decrease)in liabilities:
Accounts payable (4,986) - (37,790) -
Salaries payable - 1,678 38 38
Unearned revenue - - - -
Due to other governments (2,130) - - -
Due to other funds - - (54,104) -
Net other post employment benefits 147,435 - 500 500
Compensated absences - 77,336 - -
Net Cash provided(used)by operating activities $ (272,024) $ (35,490) $ 37,590 $ 162,308
126
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011 Page 2 of 2
Information
Facilities Fleet Technology Total
RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME
(LOSS)TO NET CASH PROVIDED(USED)
BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Operating income(loss) $ 197,667 $ (205,339) $ 192,919 $ 103,593
Adjustments to reconcile operating income(loss)
to net cash provided(used)by operating activities:
Depreciation 27,235 - - 27,235
(Increase)decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable 779 78 9,218 8,839
Due from other funds - - - 54,104
Due from other governments - - (624) (624)
Inventory - (19,162) - (19,162)
Prepaid items - 1,500 (8,866) (214,711)
Increase(decrease)in liabilities:
Accounts payable (42,047) 45,315 (9,684) (49,192)
Salaries payable 69 (2,161) (740) (1,078)
Unearned revenue (39,226) - - (39,226)
Due to other governments 301 545 4,294 3,010
Due to other funds - - - (54,104)
Net other post employment benefits 7,774 5,609 - 161,818
Compensated absences - - - 77,336
Net Cash provided(used)by operating activities $ 152,552 $ (173,615) $ 186,517 $ 57,838
127
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Agency Funds
Agency Funds
Agency funds are used to account for assets held by the government as an agent for individuals, private
organizations,other governments, or other funds.
Escrow - This fund is used to account for various deposits (mainly contractor's deposits to guarantee
payment of special assessments for water, sewer, streets and other improvements) required by the City.
This fund is also used for accumulating donations and other contributions for specific purposes.
WAFTA - This fund accounts for the collection and remittance of expenses pertaining to the fire
training facility owned by 11 member cities.
MCES - This fund accounts for the collection and remittance of sewer availability charges to the
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services.
128
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
AGENCY FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET ASSETS
DECEMBER 31,2011
Escrow 2011
Fund WAFTA MCES Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 1,227,692 $ 90,734 $ 53,520 $ 1,371,946
Accounts receivable - 144 - 144
Total assets $ 1,227,692 $ 90,878 $ 53,520 $ 1,372,090
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable $ 1,227,692 $ - $ - $ 1,227,692
Due to other governments - 90,878 53,520 144,398
Total liabilities $ 1,227,692 $ 90,878 $ 53,520 $ 1,372,090
129
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
AGENCY FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2011
Balance Balance
January 1 December 31
2011 Additions Deductions 2011
Escrow
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 1,178,629 $ 368,182 $ 319,119 $ 1,227,692
Total assets $ 1,178,629 $ 368,182 $ 319,119 $ 1,227,692
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 1,178,629 $ 592,611 $ 543,548 $ 1,227,692
WAFTA:
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 71,537 $ 22,410 $ 3,213 $ 90,734
Accounts receivable - 22,144 22,000 144
Total assets $ 71,537 $ 44,554 $ 25,213 $ 90,878
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ - $ - $ - $ -
Due to other governments 71,537 22,554 3,213 90,878
Total liabilities $ 71,537 $ 22,554 $ 3,213 $ 90,878
MCES
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 14,700 $ 396,940 $ 358,120 $ 53,520
Accounts receivable - - - -
Total assets $ 14,700 $ 396,940 $ 358,120 $ 53,520
Liabilities:
Due to other governments $ 14,700 $ 407,979 $ 369,159 $ 53,520
Total liabilities $ 14,700 $ 407,979 $ 369,159 $ 53,520
Totals-All Agency Funds
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 1,264,866 $ 787,532 $ 680,452 $ 1,371,946
Accounts receivable - 22,144 22,000 144
Total assets $ 1,264,866 $ 809,676 $ 702,452 $ 1,372,090
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 1,178,629 $ 592,611 $ 543,548 $ 1,227,692
Due to other governmental units 86,237 430,533 372,372 144,398
Total liabilities $ 1,264,866 $ 1,023,144 $ 915,920 $ 1,372,090
130
Statistical
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Statistical Section
(Unaudited)
This part of the City of Eden Prairie's comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information
as a context for understanding this year's financial statements, note disclosures, and supplementary
information. This information has not been audited by the independent auditor.
Contents Page
Financial Trends 133-138
These tables contain trend information that may assist the reader in assessing the City's current
financial performance by placing it in historical perspective.
Revenue Capacity 139-142
These tables contain information that may assist the reader in assessing the viability of the City's
most significant"own-source" revenue, the property tax.
Debt Capacity 143-146
These tables present information that may assist the reader in analyzing the affordability of the
City's current levels of outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional debt in the
future.
Demographic and Economic Information 147-155
These tables offer economic and demographic indicators that are commonly used for financial
analysis and that can increase one's understanding of the City's present and ongoing financial
status.
Operating Information 156-157
These tables contain service and infrastructure indicators that can increase one's understanding
of how the information in the City's financial statements relates to the services the City provides
and the activities it performs.
Source:
Unless otherwise noted,the information in these tables is derived from the comprehensive annual financial
reports for the relevant year. The City implemented GASB Statement No. 34 in calendar year 2003;
schedules presenting government-wide information include information beginning in that year.
132
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Government-wide Net Assets by Category (accrual basis of accounting)
Last Nine Years
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Governmental Activities
Invested in capital assets,net of related debt $ 106,289,304 $ 128,665,664 $ 135,346,250 $ 133,041,891 $ 155,494,482 $ 162,522,110 $ 165,578,857 $ 169,874,219 $ 178,022,468
Restricted 12,352,637 6,200,846 6,225,359 6,298,693 6,090,520 6,231,872 9,470,494 8,882,954 9,190,791
Unrestricted 45,992,152 45,055,078 50,144,555 64,133,581 53,052,529 56,235,986 49,907,035 50,954,497 48,843,723
Subtotal governmental activities net assets 164,634,093 179,921,588 191,716,164 203,474,165 214,637,531 224,989,968 224,956,386 229,711,670 236,056,982
Business-type Activities
Invested in capital assets,net of related debt 156,101,861 143,594,356 141,987,088 140,872,743 142,849,627 143,504,412 142,093,191 138,307,152 138,397,769
Unrestricted 3,488,927 9,935,174 11,466,436 10,575,056 9,249,768 7,050,651 6,301,188 5,224,848 9,452,826
Subtotal business-type activities net assets 159,590,788 153,529,530 153,453,544 151,447,799 152,099,395 150,555,063 148,394,379 143,532,000 147,850,595
Primary Government
Invested in capital assets,net of related debt 262,391,165 272,260,020 277,333,338 273,914,634 298,344,109 306,026,522 307,672,048 308,181,371 316,420,237
Restricted 12,352,637 6,200,846 6,225,359 6,298,693 6,090,520 6,231,872 9,470,494 8,882,954 9,190,791
Unrestricted 49,481,079 54,990,252 61,611,011 74,708,637 62,302,297 63,286,637 56,208,223 56,179,345 58,296,549
Total primary-government net assets $ 324,224,881 $ 333,451,118 $ 345,169,708 $ 354,921,964 $ 366,736,926 $ 375,545,031 $ 373,350,765 $ 373,243,670 $ 383,907,577
Less than ten years of information presented due to information not available prior to conversion to GASB 34.
133
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Changes in Net Assets-Total (accrual basis of accounting)
Last Nine Years
Source 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Expenses
Governmental activities $ 32,123,423 $ 34,315,872 $ 38,130,927 $ 38,902,477 $ 41,926,473 $ 45,881,058 $ 47,397,022 $ 45,701,477 $ 45,294,566
Business-type activities 19,853,224 20,881,410 22,121,630 22,634,036 24,768,351 25,265,911 25,599,664 26,739,072 27,530,501
Total expenses $ 51,976,647 $ 55,197,282 $ 60,252,557 $ 61,536,513 $ 66,694,824 $ 71,146,969 $ 72,996,686 $ 72,440,549 $ 72,825,067
Program Revenues:
Governmental activities $ 17,974,170 $ 14,928,446 $ 18,214,641 $ 14,693,423 $ 15,020,071 $ 16,270,317 $ 12,361,210 $ 13,032,144 $ 14,786,027
Business-type activities 17,674,920 21,388,751 22,408,032 21,513,949 25,894,561 23,669,165 24,115,894 23,654,183 25,863,662
Total program revenues 35,649,090 36,317,197 40,622,673 36,207,372 40,914,632 39,939,482 36,477,104 36,686,327 40,649,689
Net(expense)revenue (16,327,557) (18,880,085) (19,629,884) (25,329,141) (25,780,192) (31,207,487) (36,519,582) (35,754,222) (32,175,378)
General revenues and transfers:
Governmental activities 26,518,533 29,916,113 30,718,677 35,967,055 38,069,768 39,963,178 35,002,230 37,424,617 36,853,851
Business-type activities (677,069) (1,965,194) (620,361) (405,749) (474,614) 52,414 (676,914) (1,777,490) (1,230,687)
Total general revenues and transfers 25,841,464 27,950,919 30,098,316 35,561,306 37,595,154 40,015,592 34,325,316 35,647,127 35,623,164
Change in net assets $ 9,513,907 $ 9,070,834 $ 10,468,432 $ 10,232,165 $ 11,814,962 $ 8,808,105 $ (2,194,266) $ (107,095) $ 3,447,786
Less than ten years of information presented due to information not available prior to conversion to GASB 34.
134
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Changes in Net Assets-Governmental Activities (accrual basis of accounting)
Last Nine Years
Source 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Expenses
General government $ 9,577,100 $ 10,620,023 $ 13,375,941 $ 14,280,765 $ 14,424,872 $ 15,308,258 $ 9,506,1 04 $ 9,183,334 $ 9,263,991
Public safety 8,244,041 10,910,006 12,102,614 11,713,095 13,883,325 15,808,506 19,346,668 17,985,648 17,538,536
Public works 8,456,449 6,473,043 6,810,846 7,313,935 5,960,154 7,048,819 8,128,507 7,522,749 7,665,875
Parks and recreation 4,338,435 5,480,061 4,949,620 4,396,128 6,087,328 6,212,450 8,606,431 9,769,235 9,617,076
Interest on longterm debt 1,507,398 832,739 891,906 1,198,554 1,570,794 1,503,025 1,809,312 1,240,511 1,209,088
3 3 3 ,v' 3 ,9 ,v. v",f.. ,2 i 5
Tot expenses $ _,1'.,-}_ $ -},31. �;'_ $ 1;,1' _. S � �',-};'. 41 'S,-};'. -}�hTl, ,� -};',' �'2 $ -}� . ;1,4," $ -}�_�4,,4,
Program Revenues:
Charges for services:
General government $ 4,818,031 $ 1,988,779 $ 3,004,416 $ 2,859,961 $ 2,573,708 $ 2,506,269 $ 948,287 $ 958,005 $ 966,931
Public safety 1,103,653 3,483,050 3,410,157 3,425,626 3,349,520 3,005,158 2,351,256 3,135,082 3,264,191
Public works 4,457,178 389,225 567,233 403,363 390,731 443,640 210,606 230,390 322,561
Parks and recreation 3,257,256 2,984,694 2,897,852 2,687,876 3,050,852 3,470,985 3,774,815 4,285,057 4,327,323
Interest on long term debt 50,301 - - - - - - -Operating grants and contributions 925,446 1,173,487 1,220,854 1,443,708 1,558,981 2,002,207 1,735,599 1,320,014 1,435,321
Capital grants and contributions 3,362,305 4,909,211 7,114,129 3,872,889 4,096,279 4,842,058 3,340,647 3,103,596 4,469,700
Tot al program revenues 17,974,170 14,928,446 18,214,641 14,693,423 15,020,071 16,270,317 12,361,210 13,032,144 14,786,027
Net(expense)revenue (14,149,253) (19,387,426) (19,916,286) (24,209,054) (26,906,402) (29,610,741) (35,035,812) (32,669,333) (30,508,539)
General revenues and transfers:
Taxes
Property taxes 24,714,298 25,156,515 26,280,177 28,545,219 31,222,834 31,907,308 31,687,277 31,527,570 31,310,140
Tax increment - 1,702,742 2,289,648 2,407,638 2,689,433 3,034,260 3,250,611 3,450,291 3,139,080
Grants and contributions not restricted
to specific programs 384,565 343,241 298,506 190,446 225,295 195,478 206,907 229,510 752,907
Investment earnings 660,984 619,463 1,046,852 2,574,984 3,049,185 1,751,418 672,822 427,377 259,808
Gain(loss) on sale of capital assets - - - 1,431,440 - 2,883,897 (1,505,613) - 121,916
Transfers 758,686 2,094,152 803,494 817,328 883,021 190,817 690,226 1,789,869 1,270,000
Total general revenues and transfers 26,518,533 29,916,113 30,718,677 35,967,055 38,069,768 39,963,178 35,002,230 37,424,617 36,853,851
Change in net assets $ 12,369,280 $ 10,528,687 $ 10,802,391 $ 11,758,001 $ 11,163,366 $ 10,352,437 $ (33,582) $ 4,755,284 $ 6,345,312
Less than ten years of information presented due to information not available prior to conversion to GASB 34.
135
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Changes in Net Assets-Business-type Activities (accrual basis of accounting)
Last Nine Years
Source 2003 2094 2005 2006 2007 2908 2009 2919 2911
Expenses
Water 1 Sewer $ 12,174,191 $ 12,835,671 $ 11,838,114 $ 12,137,487 $ 13,161,533 $ 13,418,071 $ 13,462,844 $ 14,035,916 $ -
Water - - - - - - - - 8,162,292
Sewer - - - - - - - - 6,671,324
Storm - - 1,329,224 1,256,092 1,986,557 1,725,629 1,523,876 1,983,337 1,915,249
Liquor 7,679,033 8,045,739 8,954,292 9,240,457 9,620,261 10,122,211 10,612,944 10,719,819 10,781,636
Total expenses $ 19,853,224 $ 20,881,410 $ 22,121,630 $ 22,634,036 $ 24,768,351 $ 25,265,911 $ 25,599,664 $ 26,739,072 $ 27,530,501
Program Revenues:
Charges for services:
Water/Sewer $ 8,088,439 $ 11,514,737 $ 9,734,838 $ 10,415,372 $ 11,553,501 $ 11,551,147 $ 11,487,634 $ 11,103,035 $ -
Water - - - - - - - - 7,743,061
Sewer - - - - - - - - 4,926,624
Storm - - 600,237 644,131 614,590 818,987 910,568 831,731 1,054,077
Liquor 8,415,914 8,880,874 10,038,462 10,454,446 10,741,799 11,299,031 11,717,692 11,687,919 11,724,900
Operating grants and contributions - - - - - - - 31,498 -
Capital grants and contributions 1,170,567 993,140 2,034,495 - 2,984,671 - - - 415,000
Total program revenues 17,674,920 21,388,751 22,408,032 21,513,949 25,894,561 23,669,165 24,115,894 23,654,183 25,863,662
Net(expense)revenue (2,178,304) 507,341 286,402 (1,120,087) 1,126,210 (1,596,746) (1,483,770) (3,084,889) (1,666,839)
General revenues and transfers:
Grants and contributions not restricted - - - - - - - - 4,016
to specific programs
Investment earnings 19,835 128,958 183,133 411,579 408,407 243,231 13,312 12,379 35,297
Gain on sale of capital assets 16,540 - - - - - - - -
Transfers (713,444) (2,094,152) (803,494) (817,328) (883,021) (190,817) (690,226) (1,789,869) (1,270,000)
Total general revenues and transfers (677,069) (1,965,194) (620,361) (405,749) (474,614) 52,414 (676,914) (1,777,490) (1,230,687)
Change in net assets $ (2,855,373) $ (1,457,853) $ (333,959) $ (1,525,836) $ 651,596 $ (1,544,332) $ (2,160,684) $ (4,862,379) $ (2,897,526)
Less than ten years of information presented due to information not available prior to conversion to GASB 34.
Prior to 2011,Water and Sewer were combined.
136
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Fund Balances-Governmental Funds
Last Ten Years
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
General fund
Reserved $ 3,946,916 $ 3,585,138 $ 3,906,562 $ 4,198,756 $ 1,145,293 $ 253,954 $ 138,507 $ 55,864 $ 66,238 $ -
Unreserved 15,099,670 16,281,005 16,526,362 17,133,623 18,042,399 19,392,450 20,292,813 20,535,345 20,877,251 -
Nonspendable - - - - - - - - - 18,266
Unassigned - - - - - - - - - 21,162,123
Subtotal general fund 19,046,586 19,866,143 20,432,924 21,332,379 19,187,692 19,646,404 20,431,320 20,591,209 20,943,489 21,180,389
General fund%change 19.8% 4.3% 2.9% 4.4% (10.1%) 2.4% 4.0% 0.8% 1.7% 1.1%
All other govt'funds
Reserved 17,712,219 11,862,916 6,200,846 4,816,402 6,299,082 6,314,553 159,698 141,011 118,186 -
Unreserved:
Special revenue 753,437 943,960 312,197 517,164 579,738 587,431 516,296 556,462 548,831 Debt service (325) (56,285) (94,381) (43,896) (223) (1,162) 6,352,188 5,084,425 4,383,750 -
Capital projects 14,173,459 18,322,735 20,108,258 19,196,836 31,749,345 18,556,887 18,912,365 18,890,716 19,775,005 -
Trust and Agency 129,677 - - - - - - - - -
Permanent - 134,773 136,053 138,518 139,106 139,965 142,094 143,045 140,584 -
Nonspendable - - - - - - - - - 812,151
Restricted - - - - - - - - - 15,261,699
Assigned-Capital Projects - - - - - - - - - 17,951,086
Unassigned - - - - - - - - - (3,687,585)
Subtotal all other
govt'funds 32,768,467 31,208,099 26,662,973 24,625,024 38,767,048 25,597,674 26,082,641 24,815,659 24,966,356 30,337,351
Total govt'funds
Reserved 21,659,135 15,448,054 10,107,408 9,015,158 7,444,375 6,568,507 298,205 196,875 184,424 -
Unreserved 30,155,918 35,626,188 36,988,489 36,942,245 50,510,365 38,675,571 46,215,756 45,209,993 45,725,421 -
Nonspendable - - - - - - - - - 830,417
Restricted - - - - - - - - - 15,261,699
Assigned-Capital Projects - - - - - - - - - 17,951,086
Unassigned - - - - - - - - - 17,474,538
Total govt'funds $ 51,815,053 $ 51,074,242 $ 47,095,897 $ 45,957,403 $ 57,954,740 $ 45,244,078 $ 46,513,961 $ 45,406,868 $ 45,909,845 $ 51,517,740
All gout'funds%change 7.5% (1.4%) (7.8%) (2.4%) 26.1% (21.9%) 2.8% (2.4%) 1.1% 12.2%
GASB 54 was implemented in 2011
137
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Changes in Fund Balances-Governmental Funds (modified accrual basis of accounting)
Last Ten Years
Source 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Revenues:
Taxes and special assessments $ 27,840,254 $ 27,783,835 $ 28,643,886 $ 30,206,322 $ 33,053,204 $ 35,309,781 $ 36,036,370 $ 36,547,460 $ 36,494,481 $ 35,876,027
Licenses and permits 3,765,662 3,580,422 3,257,634 3,513,022 3,484,074 3,414,545 3,318,249 2,386,956 3,119,449 3,363,293
Intergovernmental revenue 1,825,736 2,312,517 3,922,628 1,600,867 4,347,179 3,064,142 4,332,864 4,114,295 2,437,441 5,215,943
Charges for services 6,360,624 6,203,761 2,179,595 2,744,535 3,011,863 2,881,485 4,106,763 3,506,697 3,919,848 4,202,734
Fines and forfeits 394,466 415,896 439,269 476,520 419,745 433,369 384,509 444,979 496,449 557,512
Investment income 1,508,510 769,912 710,752 1,152,288 2,807,250 3,101,558 1,811,199 638,483 406,281 224,379
Miscellaneous revenue 4,991,538 4,277,746 4,936,284 3,604,124 2,950,874 4,597,037 2,386,186 1,556,312 1,609,244 1,488,991
Total revenues $ 46,686,790 $ 45,344,089 8 44,090,048 8 -13,2,:7,,,7, S 50,074,189 S 52,801,917 :; -2„7,,140 5 -19,113,1 2 S -18,4S3,193 S F,0,,..279
Expenditures:
General government $ 9,644,814 $ 9,683,554 $ 10,431,323 $ 13,297,706 $ 14,420,850 $ 13,579,878 $ 14,236,199 $ 9,152,896 $ 8,726,894 $ 8,768,528
Public safety 7,734,958 8,004,610 10,029,529 10,764,727 12,065,308 12,252,120 14,712,895 16,175,725 16,789,050 16,822,991
Public works 4,134,666 3,990,003 4,943,364 4,990,480 5,457,284 5,867,387 5,368,645 5,541,838 5,277,652 5,278,935
Parks and recreation 4,052,831 4,185,467 5,012,804 4,318,601 4,598,217 4,969,495 6,106,885 8,671,355 8,874,758 8,790,806
Capital outlay 14,466,576 11,676,808 11,347,805 16,999,203 10,000,224 25,478,947 13,517,922 8,188,289 5,919,859 8,696,679
Miscellaneous 540,838 105,960 87,377 120,672 242,555 275,397 210,039 130,251 42,967 17,256
Debt service
Principal 9,265,487 4,022,560 3,861,549 4,769,810 3,284,606 3,608,823 3,887,918 4,308,577 3,910,749 4,077,751
Interest 2,014,287 1,624,140 911,869 773,379 1,162,050 1,486,112 1,448,514 1,588,937 1,361,443 1,250,401
Other 106,851 144,951 26,151 73,162 154,805 38,908 55,872 118,782 44,075 96,169
Total expenditures 51,961,308 43,438,053 46,651,771 56,107,740 51,385,899 67,557,067 59,544,889 53,876,650 50,947,447 53,799,516
Excess(deficiency)of revenues
over(under)expenditures (5,274,518) 1,906,036 (2,561,723) (12,810,062) (1,311,710) (14,755,150) (7,168,749) (4,681,468) (2,464,254) (2,870,637)
Other financing sources(uses) 8,885,580 (1,204,376) 2,776,627 11,671,568 13,309,047 2,960,721 8,438,632 3,574,375 2,967,231 8,478,532
Net change in fund balance S 3,611,:062 S 701,660 S 214,904 S (1,138,494)S 11,997,337 S (11,794,42vi S 1,2,),AA3 S (1,107,093)S 502,977 s 5,4()7,>4..v5
Debt service as a 96 of
noncapitalexpendituns 30.1% 16.3% 13.1 9 13.6% 1().9".o 11.4"4. 11.2% 12.3% 11.1% 11.E
138
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Assessed/Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Property
Last Ten Years
Tax Capacity
Tax Tax Capacity Less: Less: Total Total Estimated Annual
Payable Personal Commercial Farm& Before Fiscal Tax Assessed Direct Market 96
Dec.31 Property Residential Apartments &Industrial Other Deductions Disparities Increment Value Tax Rate Value Change
2002 $ 1,012,303 39,052,891 $ 4,891,636 $ 27,869,108 $ 1,338,591 $ 74,164,529 $ 10,134,643 $ 261,957 $ 63,767,929 37.611 $ 5,818,738,000 12.5%
2003 1,026,330 44,591,407 4,590,598 28,284,563 1,245,457 79,738,355 11,193,583 1,070,532 67,474,240 35.192 6,496,639,500 11.7%
2004 1,046,857 51,646,689 4,657,705 27,952,129 1,306,580 86,609,960 11,393,809 1,124,059 74,092,092 32.945 7,188,472,300 10.6%
2005 1,159,659 58,891,623 5,435,153 28,630,702 1,284,443 95,401,580 11,355,915 2,181,143 81,864,522 30.601 7,755,652,600 7.9%
2006 1,202,194 65,779,883 5,700,405 30,783,022 1,187,555 104,653,059 11,557,916 2,396,480 90,698,663 28.782 8,593,444,425 10.8%
2007 1,316,149 71,553,209 6,443,883 35,401,780 1,005,179 115,720,200 12,573,128 2,804,557 100,342,515 28.050 9,439,037,100 9.8%
2008 1,282,145 76,169,571 6,657,437 39,973,888 53,761 124,136,802 14,480,546 3,145,493 106,510,763 27.177 9,961,912,400 5.5%
2009 1,262,207 76,242,150 6,418,903 41,524,663 58,691 125,506,614 16,186,185 3,239,713 106,080,716 27.271 10,019,575,800 0.6%
2010 1,250,594 72,344,688 5,912,957 40,911,206 63,679 120,483,124 16,806,832 3,274,193 100,402,099 28.742 9,577,402,500 -4.4%
2011 1,329,101 67,232,552 5,459,256 37,490,576 59,884 111,571,369 16,432,584 2,863,585 92,275,200 31.239 8,899,287,500 -7.1%
Percentages
2002 1.4% 52.7% 6.6% 37.6% 1.8% 15.9% 0.4%
2003 1.3% 55.9% 5.8% 35.5% 1.6% 16.6% 1.6%
2004 1.2% 59.6% 5.4% 32.3% 1.5% 15.4% 1.5%
2005 1.2% 61.7% 5.7% 30.0% 1.3% 13.9% 2.7%
2006 1.1% 62.9% 5.4% 29.4% 1.1% 12.7% 2.6%
2007 1.1% 61.8% 5.6% 30.6% 0.9% 12.5% 2.8%
2008 1.0% 61.4% 5.4% 32.2% 0.0% 13.6% 3.0%
2009 1.0% 60.7% 5.1% 33.1% 0.0% 15.3% 3.1%
2010 1.0% 60.0% 4.9% 34.0% 0.1% 16.7% 3.3%
2011 1.2% 60.3% 4.9% 33.6% 0.1% 17.8% 3.1%
Source: City Assessing Department and Hennepin County
Source:City Assessing Department and Hennepin County
139
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rate
Last Ten Years
Direct Rates Overlapping Rates
Year School School School Watershed Watershed Watershed
Ended City HRA Hennepin Special District District District District District District
Dec. 31 Rate Rate County Districts(1) #270 #272 #276 #1 #2 #4
2002 37.611 - 50.409 7.386 15.034 15.71 20.868 1.317 0.469 1.608
2003 35.192 - 50.607 7.757 20.588 18.957 24.215 1.267 0.418 1.616
2004 32.945 - 47.324 7.488 22.203 16.933 23.125 1.269 0.381 0.732
2005 30.601 - 44.172 7.382 19.176 21.855 21.989 1.165 0.354 1.375
2006 28.561 0.221 41.016 6.998 21.565 23.187 22.952 1.106 0.315 0.787
2007 27.861 0.189 39.110 7.480 19.019 23.727 24.793 1.107 0.291 0.743
2008 26.998 0.179 38.571 7.397 19.218 23.425 17.98 1.149 0.432 1.302
2009 27.092 0.179 40.413 7.154 20.080 24.691 17.186 1.246 0.936 1.246
2010 28.553 0.189 42.640 8.138 23.050 25.959 18.657 1.293 0.520 1.279
2011 31.034 0.205 45.840 9.172 26.456 28.420 21.274 1.317 0.264 1.352
Market Value Rates
Overlapping Rates
Year City School School School
Ended Direct District District District
Dec. 31 Rate #270 #272 #276
2002 0.0194 0.194 0.116 0.110
2003 0.0177 0.177 0.157 0.100
2004 0.0158 0.158 0.144 0.080
2005 0.0143 0.143 0.133 0.080
2006 0.0177 0.151 0.173 0.177
2007 0.0183 0.141 0.156 0.165
2008 0.0172 0.138 0.146 0.203
2009 0.0171 0.130 0.145 0.202
2010 0.0173 0.139 0.157 0.202
2011 0.0187 0.148 0.162 0.226
(1) Special Districts include Metropolitan Council, Regional Transit Board, Metropolitan Mosquito Control, County Park Museum, &
Hennepin Suburban Parks
140
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Principal Property Taxpayers
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2002
2011 2002
Percentage Percentage
Tax of Total Tax of Total
Taxpayer Capacity Tax(:opacity Taxpayer Capacity Tax Capacity
Eden Prairie Mall, LLC $ 2,239,250 2.0% Liberty Property Ltd Partnership $ 1,863,160 2.5%
ADC Telecommunications, Inc. 879,250 0.8% Best Buy Company 858,706 1.2%
Liberty Property Ltd Partnership- 9023 Columbine Rd, 625,650 0.6% First Industrial Ltd Partnership 848,706 1.1%
Geneva Office Exchange 615,510 0.6% ADC Telecommunications, Inc. 839,250 1.1%
Lifetouch Inc. 609,250 0.5% 11095 Viking Inc. 670,870 0.9%
Flying Cloud Office Inc. 462,830 0.4% Eden PR RPF III Ltd Partnership 621,324 0.8%
United Healthcare Seri. Inc. 452,270 0.4% United Healthcare Services 568,620 0.8%
EP-MN LLC 412,570 0.4% Gelco Corporation (GE Capital) 533,590 0.7%
Liberty Property Ltd Partnership- 7075 Flying Cloud Dr. 411,090 0.4% Ryan 1 Wilson Ltd. Partnership 504,070 0.7%
Liberty Property Ltd Partnership- 10400 Viking Dr. 407,150 0.4% MSP Investors I, LLC 487,910 0.7%
Total principal taxpayers 7,114,820 6.4% 7,796,206 10.5%
All other taxpayers 104,456,549 93.6% 66,368,323 89.5%
Total $ 111,571,369 100.0% $ 74,164,529 100.0%
Source: City of Eden Prairie Assessing Department
141
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Property Tax Levies and Collections
Last Ten Years
Collected Within the
Year Current Year Levy Collections Total Collections to Date
Ended Taxes %of in Subsequent %of
Dec.31 Levied Amount Levy Years Amount Levy
2002 $ 25,029,367 $ 24,825,795 99.19% $ 181,212 $ 25,007,007 99.91%
2003 24,653,827 24,611,527 99.83% 42,000 24,653,527 100.00%
2004 25,195,881 25,008,820 99.26% 187,646 25,196,466 100.00%
2005 26,132,057 26,072,924 99.77% 58,503 26,131,427 100.00%
2006 28,468,831 28,242,002 99.20% 227,933 28,469,935 100.00%
2007 30,657,304 30,422,094 99.23% 236,137 30,658,231 100.00%
2008 31,514,657 31,263,472 99.20% 216,283 31,479,755 99.89%
2009 31,773,143 31,278,850 98.44% 269,971 31,548,821 99.29%
2010 31,719,631 31,299,275 98.67% 15,493 31,314,768 98.72%
2011 31,719,631 31,355,647 98.85% - 31,355,647 98.85%
Source: Hennepin County
2002 taxes levied includes Market Value Homestead Credit
142
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Legal Debt Margin
Last Ten Years
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Estinj ate Market Value $ 5,818,738,000 $ 6,496,639,500 $ 7,188,472,300 $ 7,755,652,600 $ 8„93,444,425 $ 9,439,037,100 $ 9,961,912,400 $ 10,019,575,800 $ 9,577,402,500 $ 8,899,287,500
Legal Debt Margin:
Debt Limit:3%of Market Value(1) $ 116 374,760 $ 129,932,790 $ 143,769,446 $ 155,113,052 $ 171,868,889 $ 188,780,742 $ 298,857 372 $ 300,587,274 $ 287 322,075 $ 266,978,625
General Obligation T3onds 7,660,000 8,321,000 7,141,000 10,832,000 23,407,000 21,881,000 23,369,000 25,300,000 23,070,000 25,690,000
Deductions:
Amt available for repayment
of bonds 169,484 201,322 282,448 350,814 1,145,695 1,585,677 1,825,816 2,288,121 2,317,257 6,917,113
Total debt applicable to limit 7,490,516 8,119,478 6,858,552 10,501,186 22,261305 20,295 323 21,543,184 23,011,879 20,75,743 18,772,887
Legal debt Margin 108,884,244 121,813,312 136,910,894 144,611,866 149,607,584 168,485,419 277 314,188 277,575 395 266,569,332 248,205,738
As a%of debt limit 93.6% 93.8% 95.2% 93,2% 877,0% 89,2% 92,8% 92,3% 92.8% 93.0%
1-In 2008 debt limit was cbawged from 2%to 3%
143
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type
Last Ten Years
Business-Type
Governmental Activities Activities
Special
Year General Lease Assessments Percentage
Ended Obligation Revenue Improvement Contract Capital Loans Revenue of Personal Per
Dec.31 Bonds Bonds Bonds for Deed Lease Payable Bonds Total Income( 1) Capita(2)
2002 $ 7,660,000 $ 19,590,000 $ 3,540,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 64,167 $ 11,966,889 $ 43,321,056 * 737
2003 8,321,000 10,935,000 6,770,000 300,000 - 27,138 11,083,516 37,436,654 * 614
2004 7,141,000 10,085,000 6,200,000 200,000 - 12,589 9,914,891 33,553,480 * 536
2005 10,852,000 9,170,000 8,740,000 100,000 - 6,779 8,209,771 37,078,550 * 579
2006 23,407,000 8,195,000 7,790,000 - 142,773 968 5,648,261 45,184,002 * 706
2007 21,881,000 8,790,000 6,770,000 - 115,918 - 2,879,983 40,436,901 * 620
2008 23,369,000 7,695,000 7,570,000 - 123,076 - - 38,757,076 * 619
2009 25,300,000 4,845,000 6,400,000 - 83,500 - - 36,628,500 * 579
2010 23,070,000 3,795,000 7,000,000 - 42,751 - - 33,907,751 * 541
2011 25,690,000 2,685,000 8,130,000 - - - 4,125,000 40,630,000 * 646
(1)See Demographic and Economic Statistics for personal income
(2)See Demographic and Economic Statistics for population
*Information is not available
144
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Ratios of Total Debt Outstanding by Type
Last Ten Years
Ratio of Net
Year General Less Amounts Bonded Debt
Ended Obligation Available in Debt to Estimated Per
Dec.31 Debt(1) Service Fund Total Market Value(2) Capita(3)
2002 $ 7,660,000 $ 169,484 $ 7,490,516 0.13% 127
2003 8,321,000 201,522 8,119,478 0.12% 133
2004 7,141,000 282,448 6,858,552 0.10% 110
2005 10,852,000 350,814 10,501,186 0.14% 164
2006 23,407,000 (4) 1,145,695 22,261,305 0.26% 343
2007 21,881,000 1,585,677 20,295,323 0.22% 311
2008 23,369,000 1,825,816 21,543,184 0.23% 344
2009 25,300,000 2,288,121 23,011,879 0.23% 363
2010 23,070,000 2,317,257 20,752,743 0.22% 331
2011 25,690,000 6,917,113 18,772,887 0.21% 298
(1) Amount does not include special assessment improvement or revenue bonds.
(2) See "Taxable Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Property" for Market Value
(3) See Demographic and Economic Statistics for population
(4) 2006 includes $8.4 million in debt for the park referendum
145
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Bonded Debt-G. O. Bonds
December 31, 2011
Percent
Debt of Debt Net Debt
Gross Service Net Applicable Applicable
Governmental Unit Debt (1) Funds Debt to Ci y to City
Direct Debt:
City of Eden Prairie $ 25,690,000 $ 6,917,113 $ 18,772,887 100.00% $ 18,772,887
Overlapping Debt:
Hopkins ISD 270 $ 184,460,000 3,044,159 $ 181,415,841 4.07% $ 7,383,625
Eden Prairie ISD 272 85,370,000 13,257,564 72,112,436 97.55% 70,345,681
Minnetonka ISD 276 104,844,548 16,710,573 88,133,975 2.34% 2,062,335
Hennepin County 729,430,000 5,540,899 723,889,101 7.07% 51,178,959
Henn Suburban Park District 81,810,000 17,557,102 64,252,898 9.49% 6,097,600
Henn Regional RR Authority 40,505,000 376,839 40,128,161 7.07% 2,837,061
Metropolitan Council 213,645,000 70,688,475 142,956,525 3.06% 4,374,470
Total Overlapping Debt 1,440,064,548 127,175,611 1,312,888,937 144,279,731
Total Direct and
Overlapping Debt $ 1,465,754,548 $ 134,092,724 $ 1,331,661,824 $ 163,052,618
Notes:
(1) Gross debt does not include special assessment improvement or revenue bonds.
The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using taxable assessed property values. Applicable percentages
were estimated by determining the portion of the countys taxable assessed value that is within the City's boundaries and
dividing it by the county's total taxable assessed value,
146
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Demographic and Economic Statistics
Last Ten Years
Governmental Activities
(thousands
of dollars) Per
Personal Capita Median School Unemployment
Year Population Income Income Age Enrollment Rate
2002 $ 58,973 * * * $ 10,400 2.9%
2003 60,931 * * * 10,360 3.5%
2004 62,603 * * * 10,360 3.6%
2005 64,032 * * * 9,955 3.5%
2006 64,846 * * * 9,771 4.0%
2007 65,257 * * * 9,806 4.6%
2008 62,210 1 * * * 9,806 6.9%
2009 63,314 1 * * * 10,200 7.4%
2010 62,683 1 * * * 9,628 7.0%
2011 62,900 1 * * * 9,301 5.2%
Sources:
City of Eden Prairie Planning Department
Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development "Community Profile"
Minnesota Local Area Unemployment Statistics File
Minnesota Workforce Center
Eden Prairie School District 272 - Enrollment History Website
* - Data is not available
1 - Using Met Council numbers
147
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Principal Employers
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2006
2011 2006
Percentage Percentage
of Total of Total
Employer Employees City Employment Employer Employees City Employment
Upturn 1,800 3.7% EP Schools 1,400 2.8%
EP Schools 1,500 3.0% GE Capital 1,200 2.4%
CH Robinson 1,462 3.0% Rosemount 1,200 2.4%
tarkey Labs 1,436 2.9% CH Robinson 1,076 2.2%
Super Yalu 1,260 2.6% Super Yalu 900 1.8%
CIGNA 1,200 2.4% Deli Express 842 1.7%
Dell-Compellent 1,000 2.0% MIS Systems 791 1.6%
GE Capital 900 1.8% Life Touch 558 1.1%
Eaton Corp 850 1.7% Eaton Corp 500 1.0%
NITS Systems 708 1.4% Digital River 500 1.0%
Total principal employer 12,116 24.6% 8,967 16.3%
Other employers 37,172 75.4% 46,033 83.7%
Total employers 49,288 100.0% 55,000 100.0%
Source: City Community Development Division
Included 2006 data which is the first year that data was available.
148
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Employees by Function
Last Eight Years
2004 2005 2006 2007 200E 2009 2010 2011
Govcrnmtiii iI Funds:
Adm inistration
City Manager
City M Sul ager 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Assistant to the City Manager 1 1 1 1 1
Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2
City Clerk
City Clerk 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Comm unitutionServioes
Coinintutications Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sr.Comma ications Coordinator 1 1 1 1 1
IOlnintutications Coordinator 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Technician II 1 1 1
Total 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Finame
Finance I41imagi. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Finance Supervisor 1 1 1 1 1 1
Senior Accountant 1 1
Arco mit ant 1 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Accounts Payable Technician I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R.11iOr Accotuitrllg Clerk 1 1 1 1 1
Payroll Technician III 1 1 1 1 1 1
Technician I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 7 7.50 7.S0 7.50 7.50 6.50 5.50 5.50
Source:Human Resource department
Less than ten years is presented due to information not available.
149
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Employees by Function
Last Eight Years
2004 2005 2006 2007 200E 2009 2010 2011
Governmental Funds:
Cus tom er Service
Customer Service f Office 4 4 3.80 4.05 4.05 4.05 4.05 3.55
Total 4.0 4.0 3,8 4.05 4.05 4.05 4.05 3.55
Human Resources
HLun an Re s0 MCC's Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Senior HLunan Resources Generalist 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Human Resotuces Technician III 1 1 1 1 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Organization Development Specialist 0.50 0.50 0.60 1
AdninistrationAssistant I 1 1 0.75 0.75 1 1 1 1
Payroll Technician III 1 1
Total 4 4 425 425 420 4.60 4.60 4.60
Comm unity Development
Assessing
City Assessor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Appraiser 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Technician I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Planning
Pla 'tig
City Planner 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Senior Planner 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Planner 1.65 1,65 1.65 1.65 2.15 1.5 1.5 1.5
Heritage Preservation Specialist 1 1 1 1 0.50
Administrative Assistant! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 4.5 4.5 4.5
Cam m unity Development
Community Development Director 1 1 1 1 1 0.9 0.9 1
Administrative Assistant II 1 1 1 1 1
Total 2 2 0.9 0.9 1
Economic Development
Manager of Economic Development I I I 1 1 1 1 1
Total I I I I 1 1 1 1
Source: Human Resource department
Less than ten years is presented due to information not available.
150
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Employees by Function
Last Eight Years
2004 2005 2006 2007 200E 2009 2010 2011
Governmental Funds:
Housing and Community Services
Manager of I-lousing.-Community Sry 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Comm unity Services Coordinator 1 1 O.S O.S O.S O.S
Comm unity ServicesTechnician 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total 2 2 3 3 2.5 2 2 2
Parks and Recreation
Park Adm inistratiorr
Park and Recreation Director 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Administrative Assistant II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Park&Natural Resources
Manager of Parks and Natural Resource 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Forestry Technician 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Supervisor of Pauk]44aintcnau cc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Supervisor Park Constriutian/Repair 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Maintenance Worker Packs 1S 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Total 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Recreation Program m ing
Manager of Recreation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Recreation Coordinator 4 4 4 4 4 3.5 3.5 3.5
Outdoor Center 1 NatLrC Progr EMI rncr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 6 6 6 6 6 .-
D.-
Com m unity Center
Recreation Coordinator 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Office Supervisor 1 1
Community Center Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1
Customer Service I Office Assistant 3 2 2 2.S 2.S 2.5 2.5 2.5
Total 5 5 5 5.5 5.5 S.5 S.5 S.5
Art Center
Manager-Art Center 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Source:Human Resource department
Less than ten years is presented due to information not available.
151
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Employees by Function
Last Eight Years
2004 2005 2006 2007 200E 2009 2010 2011
Governmental Funds:
Senior Center
Manager-Community Center
Recreation Coordinator 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Administrative Assistant I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Police
Police
Police Chief 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Deputy Police Chief 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Li€ut€ntants 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3
Sergeants 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Police Officers 47 46 47 48 49 48 48 48
Animal Control Officer 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Telecommunications Supervisor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T€l€cornrntulicators 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 10 10 10 10
Records Supervisor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Records Tech 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.7S 6.7=
Int'€strgatrv€Aide 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Adrninistrativ€Assist aunt 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Customer Service 1 Office Assistant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Law Enforcement Analyst 1 1 1 1 1
Projects Coordinator 0,60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Zoning Administrator 0.80 0.80 0.80 1 1 1 1 1
Total 88.65 88.65 89.65 90.85 92.35 9135 91.35 91.35
Fire
Fire
Fire Chief 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Assistant Fire Chief 0,50 1 1 1 1 2
Fire Marshal 1 1 1 1 1 0.8 0.8
Fire Prevention Specialist 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Rental Housing Inspector 1 1 1 1 1 1
Electronic Conlin rnications Specialist 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Administrative Assistant II I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 7 7 8.50 9 9 8.8 8.8 9
Source:Human Resource department
Less than ten years is presented due to information not available.
152
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Employees by Function
Last Eight Years
2004 2005 2006 2007 200E 2009 2010 2011
Governmental Funds:
1 nsjei lions
Manager of Building hispections 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Building Inspectors II 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6
Technician I 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Technician II 1 1 1 1 1
Total 11 11 11 11 11 9 9 9
Public Works
Engineering
Public Works Director 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
City Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Assistant City Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Engineering Technician I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Engineering Technician II 1 1 1 1 1
Senior Project Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Senior Traffic Engineer 1 1 1 1 1
Fin,}in€erung Project Coordinator 1 1 1 1 1 1
Senior Engineering Tech 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Administrative Assistant II 1 1 1 1 1
Total 123 123 123 12.3 12.3 93 8.3 83
Streets&Traffic
Manager of Street Maintenance 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Maintenance Workers 14 14 14 14 14 13 13 13
Administrative Assistant I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 15
Total Governmental Funds
Administration 22.00 22.50 22.55 22.80 22.75 21.15 20.15 19.65
Cornrn unity Development 17.65 17.65 18.65 18.65 18.15 15.40 15.40 15.50
Parks&Recreation 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.50 36,00 35.50 35.50 35.50
Police S8.65 88.65 89.6S 90.85 92.35 91.35 91.35 91.35
Fire 18.00 18.00 19.50 20.00 20.00 17.80 17.80 18.00
Public Works 28.30 28?0 28.30 28?0 28.30 24.30 23.30 23.30
Total 209.60 210.10 213.65 216.10 217.55 205.50 203.50 203.30
Source:Human Resource department
Less than ten years is presented due to information not available.
153
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Employees by Function
Last Eight Years
2004 2005 2006 2007 200E 2009 2010 2011
Enterprise Funds:
Liquor
Liquor Operations Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Managers 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Assistant 141aun age r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Senior Assistant Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Inventory Control Clerk 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Utilities
Public Works Director 0,2 0.2 0,2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Manager of Utilities 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Water Treatment Supervisor 1 1 1 1 1 1
Water Treatment Lead 1 1 1 1
Water Treatment Maintenance Lead 1 1 1 1 1 1
Water Treatment Operators 11 11 8 8 8 8 8 9
Utility Field Operations Supervisor 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Utility Field Operations Lead 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Water Treatrncnt Maintenance Technician 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Utility Field Operators 8 8 11 11 11 11 11 11
Projects Coordinator 1 1
Utility Operations Project Manager 1 1 1 1
Storm Utility Maintenance Operator 1 1 1 1 1
Adtniistrative Assistant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Technician II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Customer Service I Office Assistant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Enviornmental Coordinator 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Senior Engineering Tech 0.S 0.5 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
29.7 30.7 31,7 32.7 33.7 32.7 33.7 34.7
Source:Human Resource department
Less than ten years is presented due to information not available.
154
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Employees by Function
Last Eight Years
2004 2005 2006 2007 200E 2009 2010 2011
Internal Service Funds:
Workers Compensation
Manager of Support Services 0.S 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total 0.S 0.S 0.5 0.S 0.5 0.S 0.S 0.5
Property insurance
Manager of Support Services 0.S 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total 0.S 0.5 0.S 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Fleet Services
Public Works Superintendent 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Maintenance Worker 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5
Total 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6
Facilities
Facilities:PO imager 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Facilities Supervisor 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Facilities Engineer 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
Facilities Technician 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Technician I 0.S 0.5 0.5 0.S 0.S 0.S 0.5 0.5
Total 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5
Information Tech nolo •
Information Technology Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Technology Analyst I Developer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
IT Specialist 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
GIS Specialist 1 1 1 1
IT Technician 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Technician I 0.5 0.5 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total 5.5 5.5 5,5 5,5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Grand Total 2 68.3 0 269.80 2 74.3 5 277.80 282.25 2 69.2 0 268.20 269.00
155
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Operating Indicators
Last Ten Years
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 200E 2009 2010 2011
General Government:
Eondrating Aa1 Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa
Housing and Htunan Services:
Nrun her of residents served 2,645 2,750 3,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,000
Assessing:
Nrunher of appraisals completed 6,458 6,526 6,000 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,643 5,276 5,517 4,827
Parks and recreation:
Avg monthly cornin runty center inem berships nia nl a nla nra lira ilia 843 1,751 2,100 2,300
Program registrations 10,741 10,642 12,173 12,751 14,027 15,281 15,844 15,689 16,213 15,010
Public Safety:
Fie:
Nmnbcr of calls 880 886 908 975 888 1,011 1,233 1,247 1,633 1,143
Inspection permits issued 7,582 7,253 7,000 7,090 6,590 7,042 6,157 5,225 6,446 6,531
Police:
Number of calls 45,122 45,209 52,554 54,622 47,190 52,543 54,483 59,470 52,041 59,544
Public Works:
Patching materials(tons) nra ilia 2,200 2,300 2,500 2,500 1,900 2,500 2,800 2,700
Overlays(tons) 16,140 17,140 17,640 18,140 26,027 19,900 24,600 31,800 26,300 22,400
Crack filling materials tabs) 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 200,000 200,000 112,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
Rai coating(sq yards) 520,000 520,000 320,000 520,000 402,258 360,535 324,000 427,000 392,000 475,300
Water System:
N Lunn ber of connections 17,029 17,370 17,717 18,271 18,607 18,745 18,794 18,800 18,948 18,971
Water in.in repairs n/a nla nra nra 15 153 35 28 41 56
Ntun ber of hydrant flushed IV 3,899 3,980 3,960 4,062 3,998 4,122 4,234 4,224 4,158
Average daily usage 7.3 MGD 8.5 MGD 8.0 MGD 8,0 MGD 8,0 MGD 8,0 MGD 8.0 MGD 9.0 MGD 7.7 MGD 8.1 MGD
Sewer System:
Number of connections 16,555 16,950 17,391 17,971 18,307 18,445 18,557 18,600 18,355 18,416
Miles of sanitary sewer cleaned 79 85 94 94 60 65 50 75 80 94
Storm System:
Number of storm sumps maintained 146 143 188 154 138 63 157 101 93 61
Sources:Various city departments
MGD-Million Gallons Daily
N/A-Not available
156
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Capital Assets Statistics by Function
Last Ten Years
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 200E 2009 2010 2011
Public Safety
Fire Protection:
Num bcr of stations 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
Ntun bcr of voltuiteer firefighters 77 75 74 72 79 95 95 95 96 93
Police Protection:
Ntunber of stations 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Public Works:
Miles of city streets 217 2.21 222 224 225 225 232 231 2.29 230
Parks and Recreation:
City parks 37 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43
Conservation areas 15 15 15 15 5 15 15 15 15 15
Historic sites 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Special ttse areas 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Miles of trails 80 90 90 90 110 112 112 114 114 120
Water System:
Ntun her of wells 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 15 15 16
Total ptunping capacity 19 MGD 22 MGD 22 MGD 22 MGD 22 MGD 22 MGD 22 MGD 22 MGD 24 MGD 24 MGD
Total storage capacity 8.SM gals 8.5M gals S SM gals S.5M gals 8.5M gals 8.5M gals S 5M gals 8.5M gals 8.5M gals 8.5M glas
Miles of water in airs 248 255 259 261 264 265 265 268 269 317
Sewer System:
Miles of sanitary sewer 224 233 236 237 241 242 242 244 244 256
Miles of storm sewer 150 154 159 162 166 168 168 171 172 174
Sources:Various city departments
Note:No capital asset indicators are available for the general government functions.
MGD-Million Gallons Daily
NIA-Not available
157
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Hennepin County, Minnesota
MANAGEMENT LETTER
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AS A RESULT OF
THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1
REQUIRED COMMUNICATION 3
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 6
I(DN-
Expert advice. When you need it.s"
REPORT ON MATTERS IDENTIFIED AS A RESULT OF
THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Honorable Mayor of Members
of the City Council
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing
standards and Government Auditing Standards, we considered the City's internal control over financial
reporting(internal control) as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the
effectiveness of the City's internal control.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the preceding paragraph
and would not necessarily identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be deficiencies,
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses and, therefore, there can be no assurance that all
deficiencies, significant deficiencies or material weaknesses have been identified. Material weaknesses
and significant deficiencies identified, if any, are stated within this letter.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or
detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination
of deficiencies in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the City's financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis.
A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less
severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with
governance.
The accompanying memorandum includes financial analysis and recommendations for improvement of
accounting procedures and internal control measures that came to our attention as a result of our audit of
the financial statements of the City for the year ended December 31, 2011. The matters discussed herein
were considered by us during our audit and they do not modify the opinion expressed in our Independent
Auditor's Report dated May 8, 2012, on such statements.
1
KOV
This communication is intended solely for the information and use of management, the City Council,
others within the City and state oversight agencies and is not intended to be and should not be used by
anyone other than these specified parties.
11{,tih,4 Pe(4)4,eit 4, V- W.
KERN, DEWENTER, VIERE, LTD.
St. Cloud, Minnesota
May 8, 2012
2
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
REQUIRED COMMUNICATION
December 31, 2011
We have audited the financial statements of the City for the year ended December 31, 2011, and have
issued our report dated May 8, 2012. Professional standards require that we provide you with the
following information related to our audit.
OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER U.S. GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS,
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS AND OMB CIRCULAR A-133
As stated in our engagement letter, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to
express an opinion about whether the financial statements prepared by management with your oversight
are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Our audit of the financial statements does not relieve you or management of your
responsibilities. Our responsibility is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, but not
absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatement. As part of our audit,
we considered the internal control of the City. Such considerations were solely for the purpose of
determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such internal control. We
are responsible for communicating significant matters related to the audit that are, in our professional
judgment, relevant to your responsibilities in overseeing the financial reporting process. However, we
are not required to design procedures specifically to identify such matters.
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free of
material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the
determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those
provisions was not an objective of our audit.
We also considered internal control over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and
material effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose
of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in
accordance with U.S. Office of Management and Budget(OMB) Circular A-133.
Also, in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, we examined, on a test basis, evidence about the City's
compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Circular A-133
Compliance Supplement applicable to its major federal program for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the City's compliance with those requirements. While our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion, it does not provide a legal determination on the City's compliance with those requirements.
PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT
We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously communicated to you.
3
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
REQUIRED COMMUNICATION
December 31, 2011
QUALITATIVE ASPECTS OF ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. In accordance
with the terms of our engagement letter, we will advise management about the appropriateness of
accounting policies and their application. The significant accounting policies used by the City are
described in Note 1 to the financial statements. The City implemented a new fund balance policy during
the year ended December 31, 2011 to accommodate Governmental Accounting Standards Board(GASB)
Statement No. 54,Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions. We noted no
transactions entered into during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus.
There are no significant transactions that have been recognized in the financial statements in a different
period than when the transaction occurred.
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are
based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about
future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the
financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ
significantly from those expected. The most significant estimates affecting the financial statements
were:
Depreciation—The City is currently depreciating its capital assets over their estimated useful lives,
as determined by management, using the straight-line method.
Land Held for Resale—Land held for resale is recorded using either the lower of historical cost or
estimated resale value.
We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the above estimate in determining it is
reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
The disclosures in the financial statements are neutral, consistent and clear.
DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT
We encountered no difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit.
CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS
Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during
the audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of
management. Management has received a schedule summarizing uncorrected misstatements of the
financial statements. Management has determined its effect is immaterial,both individually and in
the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole.
4
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
REQUIRED COMMUNICATION
December 31, 2011
DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT
For purposes of this letter,professional standards define a disagreement with management as a
financial accounting, reporting or auditing matter,whether or not resolved to our satisfaction that
could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that
no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit.
MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS
We requested certain representations from management which were provided to us in the
management representation letter
MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and
accounting matters, similar to obtaining a"second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation
involves application of an accounting principle to the City's financial statements or a determination
of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional
standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all
the relevant facts. We are not aware of any consultations by the City's management with other
accountants during the course of our audit.
OTHER ISSUES
We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and
auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However,
these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses
were not a condition to our retention.
OTHER INFORMATION IN DOCUMENTS CONTAINING AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
We have not reviewed, and it is our understanding, that no other published documents exist that
contain audited financial statement information, for which we are currently auditing. As stated in
our engagement letter, if you publish or reproduce the financial statements or make reference to our
Firm name in relation to such documents, you agree to provide us with a copy of the final reproduced
material for our approval before it is distributed.
5
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
The following pages provide graphic representation of select data pertaining to the financial position and
operations of the City for the past five years. Our analysis of each graph is presented to provide a basis
for discussion of past performance and how implementing certain changes may enhance future
performance. We suggest you view each graph and document if our analysis is consistent with yours. A
subsequent discussion of this information should be useful for planning purposes.
GENERAL FUND
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the City experienced a slight increase in General Fund
revenues from $ 37,201,861 in 2010 to $ 37,365,765 in 2011. Changes in revenues by source are
discussed on the following page. The General Fund revenues for 2011 and 2010 are depicted in the
following pie charts. Overall, the various sources of revenue as a percentage of total revenue for the
General Fund remained consistent from 2010 to 2011.
2011 General Fund Revenues
Taxes and
Assessments
74%
Licenses and
Permits
9%
Intergovernmental
3%
Other
3% Charges for
Services
11%
2010 General Fund Revenues
Taxes and
Assessments
76%
Licenses and
Pemuts
8%
Intergovernmental
3%
Other
2% Charges for
Services
11%
6
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
GENERAL FUND
Trends for each of the City's major revenue classifications over the past five years are graphically
portrayed in the chart below; illustrating the majority of revenue for the City is from property taxes,
which makes up 74% of all General Fund revenues. In total, the City's General Fund revenues increased
$ 2,631,305, or 7.6%, from 2007 to 2011.
General Fund Revenues I
$30,000,000
$27,500,000
$25,000,000
$22,500,000
$20,000,000
$17,500,000
$15,000,000
$12,500,000 —
$10,000,000
$7,500,000 —
$5,000,000
$2,500,000 ■ 7 i 7 7 • I ■
$ 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
•Taxes and Assessments $25,413,994 $27,901,526 $27,987,435 $28,058,029 $27,763,741
■Licenses and Permits 3,414,545 3,318,249 2,386,956 3,119,449 3,363,293
o Intergovernmental 1,231,867 1,138,398 1,096,969 1,122,980 1,143,397
•Charges for Services 2,881,485 4,106,763 3,506,697 4,010,186 4,202,734
■Other 1,792,569 1,486,673 1,116,097 891,217 892,600
Taxes and assessments decreased $ 294,288 from 2010 to 2011 as the City received remittances for a
significant amount of previously delinquent taxes in 2010.
Charges for services increased$ 192,548 from $ 4,010,186 in 2010 to $ 4,202,734 in 2011 as a result of
increased memberships and facility rentals at the Community Center.
The General Fund also experienced an increase in licenses and permits for 2011 of$ 243,844, or 7.8%,
resulting from an increase in permits and valuation of commercial remodeling.
Intergovernmental revenues and other revenues, which includes fines and forfeitures, investment income
and miscellaneous other revenue, have remained consistent with the prior years shown.
7
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
GENERAL FUND
The graph below illustrates comparison of the General Fund budget to actual revenues. Overall, General
Fund revenues were $ 2,085,049, or 5.9%, over budgeted amounts. Every category of revenue was over
budgeted amounts in 2011. The most significant variance occurred within licenses and permits, which
were $ 943,456, or 39.0%higher than budgeted as a result of conservative budgeting due to recent
economic conditions. Charges for services were over budget by$ 799,453 due to the Community Center
membership and facility rental revenues exceeding expectations. Intergovernmental revenues exceeded
budgeted amounts by$ 131,398, or 13.0%, as a result of the City receiving several federal and state
grants that were not anticipated.
Taxes and assessments were over budget by$ 209,747, but as these amounts make up approximately
74% of General Fund revenues, this category is less than 1% over budget.
[General Fund Revenues Budget and Actual
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
��
$ Taxes and
Assessments Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Other
■Budget $27,553,994 $2,419,837 $1,011,999 $3,403,281 $891,605
CI Actual 27,763,741 3,363,293 1,143,397 4,202,734 892,600
8
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
GENERAL FUND
The pie charts below and graph on the following page represent an allocation of expenditures by function.
2011 General Fund Expenditures
General
Government Public Safety
15% 46%
Debt Service
Less than 1%
Parks and Public Works
Recreation 14%
25%
2010 General Fund Expenditures
General
Government Public Safety
15% 46%
Debt Service
Less than 1%
Parks and
Recreation Public Works
25% 14%
9
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
GENERAL FUND
General Fund Expenditures
$17,000,000
$15,300,000 -
$13,600,000
$11,900,000
$10,200,000 - -
$8,500,000
I
$6,800,000
$5,100,000 -
$3,400,000
11[]Illt
$1,700,000
$- M.
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
•General Government $10,620,629 $10,288,568 $5,508,084 $5,487,297 $5,477,705
•Public Safety 12,197,501 14,637,693 16,174,590 16,812,856 16,780,592
•Public Works 5,693,181 5,215,411 5,391,226 5,146,280 5,127,079
•Parks and Recreation 4,939,098 6,093,394 8,712,335 8,833,061 8,805,548
•Debt Service 34,227 125,934 44,852 44,852 44,853
Total General Fund expenditures remained consistent with expenditures in 2010, decreasing less than
1% overall.
Expenditure categories have remained consistent with the prior year as a result of prudent spending.
10
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
GENERAL FUND
The graph below illustrates the General Fund budget to actual expenditures comparison. Overall,
General Fund expenditures were $ 308,536, or 0.8%, under budgeted amounts.
General Fund Expenditures Budget and Actual
$18,000,000
$16,000,000
$14,000,000
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000 1 11
$2,000,000
$ General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks and Recreation Debt Service
■Budget $5,788,287 $16,772,045 $5,317,553 $8,621,388 $45,040
❑Actual 5,477,705 16,780,592 5,127,079 8,805,548 44,853
The largest variance can be seen in general government, which was $ 310,582, or 5.3%,under budget.
Nearly every area within general government was under budget during 2011, with most of the variance
due to changes in staffing primarily in the Office of the City Manager, City Clerk, Human Resources and
Customer Service. The City also budgets an amount for contingencies that was not used.
Public works expenditures were $ 190,474, or 3.6%, under budget as a result of less than anticipated
street repairs and maintenance activities.
Parks and recreation expenditures were $ 184,160, or 2.1%, over budget as a result of Community
Center activities and rentals exceeding anticipated usage levels. This variance was accompanied by
Community Center revenues exceeding budgeted revenues, as explained previously.
11
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
GENERAL FUND
General Fund Operations I
$40,000,000 -
$35,000,000 -
$30,000,000 I
al
iii
$25,000,000
2$ 0,000,000 MI
15 000 000 7 I I 1
10 000 000 1 1 I 1
$5,000,000
II II I 1
$ 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
■Revenues $34,734,460 $37,951,609 $36,094,154 $37,201,861 $37,365,765
■Expenditures 33,484,636 36,361,000 35,831,087 36,324,346 36,235,777 1
o Cash Balance 20,201,797 21,149,750 21,026,781 21,426,934 22,017,792
■Unassigned Fund 19,392,450 20,292,813 20,535,345 20,877,251 21,162,123
Balance
As illustrated above, the General Fund unassigned fund balance has remained relatively consistent,
increasing slightly from$ 19,392,450 at December 31, 2007 to $ 21,162,123 at December 31, 2011.
Over the last five years, the City has been able to maintain steady cash and fund balances in a period of
generally increasing costs and variable revenues.
During 2011, the City implemented GASB Statement No. 54 and updated its fund balance policy to
strive to maintain a minimum working capital fund balance not less than 50% of next year's budgeted
tax revenue and a minimum budget stabilization fund balance not less than 15% of next year's budgeted
expenditures in unassigned fund balance. As of December 31, 2011, the City's unassigned fund balance
exceeded these two requirements by$ 157,794, which will be used for encumbrances.
12
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
TAX LEVY, CAPACITY AND RATES
The graphs below and on the following page present information relating to the City's taxable market
value, tax capacity, net tax levy and tax capacity rates.
Over the past nine years, the City's estimated market value has increased 42.0% from $ 6,337,100,230 in
2003 to $ 9,000,112,969 in 2011. There is a two year lag in estimated market values as each year's
value is based on property values estimated on January 1 of the prior year; thus, the 2011 estimated
market value is based on values on January 1, 2010. As shown below,the 2011 estimated value declined
for the second year as the declines in property values were starting to be reflected in estimated market
value. As the housing market continued experiencing difficult times during 2009 and 2010, future
estimated market values may decline.
Estimated Market Value*1
$12,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000 -
$8,000,000,000
$6,000,000,000 r p
$4,000,000,000 0
$2,000,000,000 III
$- 1111' ___A_ ! :
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
* Values obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Market Value and Tax Composition City by
City for Taxes Payable reports for each respective year; 2002 data not available.
13
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
TAX LEVY, CAPACITY AND RATES
Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation and is calculated by applying the state's
property classification system to each property's market value. As illustrated below, the taxable tax
capacity of the City has increased $ 28,683,628, or 45.1%, since 2002. The City's net property tax levy
(net of Market Value Credit and fiscal disparities adjustment) has increased 19.9%, or$ 4,719,259, in
the same time frame. The tax capacity rate has been declining since 2002 as a result of increasing
taxable tax capacity. In 2011, the tax capacity rate increased slightly when compared to 2010 as taxable
tax capacity has decreased for the second consecutive time in the ten years presented.
The levy for 2011 presented below includes the General Fund levy of$ 27,999,013 plus a levy for the
various bonds and other uses of$ 4,210,660. The tax levy is then reduced by a Market Value Credit that
is received in the form of a state aid. This aid reduces the amount of property tax revenue, but is
reflected as intergovernmental revenue in the City's financial statements. In 2011, the full Market Value
Credit state aid of$ 546,223 was unalloted by the State of Minnesota. Delinquent property tax activity
also impacts the property tax revenue amount.
Tax Capacity and Rates I
$120,000,000 - - 40.00%
— ::::
.
$100,000,000 —
$80,000,000 25.00%
$60,000,000 — — 20.00%
— 15.00%
$40,000,000
— 10.00%
$20,000,000 — 5.00%
$- — I I 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Taxable Tax Capacity =Net Levy —A.—Tax Capacity Rate
14
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
TAX LEVY, CAPACITY AND RATES
The chart below depicts average tax rates for the City, along with the average tax rates for the seven
county metro area and all Minnesota cities for 2010 and 2011. Overall, the City has generally
maintained a lower average tax rate when compared to the state and metro averages. For City residents,
the total tax rate for all taxing entities is 1.28 % and 2.13% less than metro averages and for all
Minnesota cities, respectively.
All Cities Seven County City of
State-Wide* Metro Area* Eden Prairie*
2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011
AVERAGE TAX RATE:
City 39.26% 42.53% 36.03% 40.03% 28.55% 31.03%
County 40.97% 43.74% 36.81% 42.13% 42.64% 45.84%
School 22.97% 25.23% 24.00% 26.80% 25.68% 28.18%
Special Taxing 5.87% 6.35% 6.45% 8.04% 9.57% 10.67%
Total 109.07% 117.85% 103.29% 117.00% 106.44% 115.72%
* Amounts obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Property Tax Data Table reports.
15
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
In 2011, the City's water and sewer utilities were separated into two distinct funds. As a result, only two
years of operating information is available for analysis.
Water Fund
Water Fund operating revenues increased$ 1,171,430, or 18.3%, in 2011, due to an increase in rates to
allow the City to better cover the costs of operations and a change in the City's fee structure to comply
with new state requirements. Operating expenses increased$ 376,388, or 5.0%,primarily attributable to
increased costs for an asset management and service order system and greater repairs and maintenance
expenses in an effort to extend the life of the City's infrastructure and equipment. Given this activity,
the Fund experienced an operating loss of$ 306,384, compared to an operating loss of$ 1,101,426 in
2010.
Water Fund
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$-
$(2,000,000) 2010 2011
•Operating Revenues $6,392,829 $7,564,259
•Operating Expenses 7,494,255 7,870,643
•Operating(Loss) (1,101,426) (306,384)
16
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Sewer Fund
Sewer Fund revenues increased $ 368,973, or 8.4%, from 2010 to 2011 due to an increase in fees
implemented to allow the City to cover operating costs. Operating expenses also increased 3.5% due to
an increase in salary expenses allocated to the Fund based on actual time spent on sewer-related projects.
With revenues increasing at a higher rate than expenses, the City's operating loss decreased from $
2,012,497 in 2010 to $ 1,863,698 in 2011. In 2011, operating revenues were equivalent to 72% of
operating expenditures, compared to 68% in 2010.
Sewer Fund I
$9,000,000
$7,000,000
$5,000,000
$3,000,000
$1,000,000
$(1,000,000)
$(3,000,000) 2010 2011
•Operating Revenues $4,367,273 $4,736,246
•Operating Expenses 6,379,770 6,599,944
❑Operating Loss (2,012,497) (1,863,698)
17
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Storm Drainage Fund
The Storm Drainage Fund once again experienced an operating loss in 2011. In 2011, the City increased
its utility rates by approximately 25 % in an effort to bring revenues in line with expenses. Furthermore,
there were fewer projects in this fund in 2011, resulting in a decrease in expenditures. Overall, the Fund
had an operating loss of$ 861,172, which has improved from the prior year by$ 258,620, or 23.1 %.
Storm Drainage Fund I
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$-
$(500,000) -
$(1,000,000) -
$(1,500,000) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
■Operating Revenues $606,590 $818,523 $910,514 $863,229 $1,054,077
■Operating Expenses 1,434,126 1,725,500 1,523,876 1,983,021 1,915,249
❑Operating Loss (827,536) (906,977) (613,362) (1,119,792) (861,172)
18
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Liquor Fund
The chart below shows the operations of the City's Liquor Fund for the past five years with the Building
Fund removed. While gross profit remained consistent with 2010, the fund experienced an increase in
gross profit of$ 213,757 over the past five years. The Fund also experienced an increase in expenses of
$ 346,388 over the same period as a result of increased costs and various leasehold improvements to its
existing locations. The Fund's operating income remained positive,with $ 916,287 operating income in
2011. After factoring in nonoperating revenues and expenses and transfers, net assets remained
consistent with the prior year at $ 1,203,752.
Liquor Fund]
$3,500,000 l - —
$3,000,000 :ill_ 171_
-
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000 ID
$1,000,000
$500,000
$- L
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
■Gross Profit $2,677,119 $2,784,205 $2,888,289 $2,913,571 $2,890,876
•Operating Expenses 1,628,201 1,767,796 1,877,958 1,905,372 1,974,589
O Operating Income 1,048,918 1,016,409 1,010,331 1,008,199 916,287
As depicted below, City liquor operations are consistent with Minnesota cities in the same geographical
area. Overall, the City's gross profit percentage was consistent with the metro average for off-sale
municipal stores and is within a percent of other cities shown.
2011 2010
City of City of Metro
Eden Eden City of City of City of Municipal
Prairie Prairie Edina* Richfield* Savage* Average*
Sales $ 11,547,025 $ 11,524,121 $ 12,854,693 $ 11,117,676 $ 5,181,548 $ 6,512,493
Costs of Sales 8,656,149 8,610,550 9,467,169 8,310,154 3,841,671 4,870,412
Gross Profit 2,890,876 2,913,571 3,387,524 2,807,522 1,339,877 1,642,082
Operating Expenses 1,974,589 1,905,372 2,127,474 1,903,617 1,113,098 1,164,101
Operating Income 916,287 1,008,199 1,260,050 903,905 226,779 477,981
Gross Profit Percentage 25.0% 25.3% 26.4% 25.3% 25.9% 25.2%
* Metro municipal averages obtained from the Office of State Auditor, off-sale operations for 2010.
19
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
The tables below and on the following page illustrate the City's various sources of revenue and
expenditures per capita over a three year period in comparison to 2010 data for Minnesota cities ranked
by various sizes.
Governmental Funds Revenue Per Capita
with State-Wide Averages by Population Class
State-Wide* City of Eden Prairie
Year December 31,2010 2009 2010 2011**
Population 2,500-10,000 10,000-20,000 20,000-100,000 62,536 62,683 62,900
Property Taxes $ 386 $ 359 $ 407 $ 506 $ 506 $ 500
Tax Increments 45 52 56 52 55 50
Franchise Fees and Other Taxes 26 34 30 12 12 12
Special Assessments 74 61 65 26 21 21
Licenses and Permits 19 22 29 26 38 41
Intergovernmental Revenues 291 271 149 66 39 83
Charges for Services 89 83 76 56 63 67
Other 73 70 57 42 40 36
Total Revenue $ 1,003 $ 952 $ 869 $ 786 $ 773 $ 810
* State-wide data obtained from the Office of the State Auditor's 2010 Minnesota City Finances
Report.
** Population is estimated as of January 1, 2011 from the Met Council population data study.
The City receives little in intergovernmental revenues, including Local Government Aid and Market
Value Credits and, thus, has consistently shown higher tax revenues per capita and lower
intergovernmental revenues per capita compared to the state averages. Total governmental revenues
increased$ 37 per capita from 2010. The most significant increase was in intergovernmental revenue,
where the City received a significant amount of state MSA funding to cover the City's portion of costs
for the Trunk Highway 169/494 interchange reconstruction project. Property taxes decreased $ 6 per
capita as a result of a decrease in receipts for delinquent taxes from prior years. Tax increments also
decreased per capital due to a refunding of TIF receipts resulting from a devaluation of property.
20
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
Governmental Funds Expenditures Per Capita
with State-Wide Averages by Population Class
State-Wide* City of Eden Prairie
Year December 31,2010 2009 2010 2011**
Population 2,500-10,000 10,000-20,000 20,000-100,000 62,536 62,683 62,900
Current:
General Government $ 125 $ 102 $ 85 $ 88 $ 88 $ 87
Public Safety 227 223 235 259 268 267
Public Works 115 112 92 89 84 84
Parks and Recreation 75 93 87 139 142 140
Other 75 76 85 60 52 53
Total Current $ 617 $ 606 $ 584 $ 635 $ 634 $ 631
Capital Outlay
and Construction $ 289 $ 312 $ 223 $ 131 $ 94 $ 138
Debt Service:
Principal $ 180 $ 181 $ 111 $ 69 $ 62 $ 65
Interest and Fiscal 63 53 43 27 22 21
Total Debt Service $ 243 $ 234 $ 154 $ 96 $ 84 $ 86
* State-wide data obtained from the Office of the State Auditor's 2010 Minnesota City
Finances Report.
** Population is estimated as of January 1, 2011 from the Met Council population data study.
The City's current expenditures for 2011 were more than the state-wide average for a city of a
comparable population. Overall, governmental expenditures increased approximately$ 2,916,000 from
2010 to 2011. The largest variances was observed in capital outlay, which increased$ 44 per capita in
2011 due to costs incurred for the City's portion of the construction costs on the Trunk Highway
169/494 interchange reconstruction project, as well as costs for the Flying Cloud Ballfield expansion.
Despite additional projects in 2011, capital outlay per capita continues to stand below state-wide
averages for all population categories. Debt service costs also remain well below state-wide averages for
2009-2011.
21
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
December 31, 2011
GOVERNMENTAL NET ASSETS
Components of Net Assets I
$250,000,000 —
$56,235,986 $49,907,035 $50,954,497 $48,843,723
$225,000,000 $53,052,529
$200,000,0001.1
■
M.$9,190,791
$175,000,000 M_$9,470,494 $8,882,954
m. S6,090,520 $6,231,872
$178,022,468
$150,000,000 $165,578,857 $169,874,219
$162,522,110
$125,000,000 $155,494,482
$100,000,000
$75,000,000
$50,000,000
$25,000,000 ■
$-
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
■Invested in Capital Assets,Net of Related Debt ❑Restricted •Unrestricted I
The City's governmental net asset balance is comprised of the three categories listed in the above chart.
Net assets invested in capital assets, net of related debt increased in 2011 as the City increased its assets
more than it increased its debts. Restricted amounts are to be used on future debt payments. The
unrestricted portion of net assets is the remaining balance that is not invested in capital assets or
restricted for specific purposes.
22
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Hennepin County,Minnesota
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF
FEDERAL AWARDS AND INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR'S REPORTS
For the Year Ended December 31,2011
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS 1
NOTE TO THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS 2
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN
AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS 3
REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS THAT COULD
HAVE A DIRECT AND MATERIAL EFFECT ON EACH MAJOR
PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133 5
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133 8
REPORT ON LEGAL COMPLIANCE 10
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS
For the Year Ended December 31,2011
Federal
CFDA Federal
Federal Agency/Pass Through Agency/Program Title Number Expenditures
U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development
Direct:
Community Development Block Grant 14.218 $ 422,102
U.S.Department of Transportation
Passed through the Minnesota Department of Public Safety:
Safe and Sober 20.600 32,459
Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders for Driving
While Intoxicated 20.608 8,384
U.S.Department of Homeland Security
Passed through the Minnesota.Commissioner of Public Safety:
Homeland Security Grant Program 97.067 41,010
U.S.Department of Justice
Direct:
Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program 16.607 10,129
Passed through Hennepin County:
Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant Program 16.804 27,320
U.S.Department of Energy
Direct:
Recovery Act Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant 81.128 103,945
Total Federal Expenditures $ 645,349
The Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is an integral part of this Schedule. 1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
NOTE TO THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS
December 31, 2011
NOTE 1 —BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of the
City and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this Schedule is
presented in accordance with the requirements of U.S. Office of Management and Budget(OMB)
Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Nonprofit Organizations. Therefore, some
amounts presented in this Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in,the preparation of
the basic financial statements.
2
�r
KD
Expert advice. When you need it.'
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities,
each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial
statements and have issued our report thereon dated May 8, 2012. We conducted our audit in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial
audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United
States.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the City's internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an
opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or
detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination
of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis.
Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described
in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in the internal
control that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. We did not identify
any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses as
defined above.
3
COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free of
material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws,regulations,
contracts and grant agreements,noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the
determination of financial statement amounts. However,providing an opinion on compliance with those
provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly,we do not express such an opinion. The
results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be
reported under Government Auditing Standards.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the City Council, federal
awarding agencies and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties.
KERN, DEWENTER, VIERS, LTD.
St. Cloud, Minnesota
May 8, 2012
4
1.(D\
Expert advice. When you need it."'
REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS THAT
COULD HAVE A DIRECT AND MATERIAL EFFECT ON EACH MAJOR
PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
COMPLIANCE
We have audited the compliance of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,with the types of compliance
requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133
Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal
programs for the year ended December 31, 2011. The City's major federal programs are identified in the
summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs in
Accordance with OMB Circular A-133. Compliance with the requirements of laws,regulations,
contracts and grants applicable to each of its major federal programs is the responsibility of the City's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the City's compliance based on our audit.
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards;
the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local
Governments and Nonprofit Organizations. Those Standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types
of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major
federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City's
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit
does not provide a legal determination of the City's compliance with those requirements.
In our opinion, the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, complied, in all material respects,with the
requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal
programs for the year ended December 31, 2011.
5
KDV
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE
The management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control
over compliance with the requirements of laws,regulations, contracts and grants applicable to federal
programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the City's internal control over
compliance with the requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program
to determine the auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test
and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133,but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly,
we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over compliance.
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over
compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a
federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a
deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal
program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis.
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first
paragraph of this section and would not necessarily identify all deficiencies in internal control that might
be deficiencies, significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in
internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above.
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities,
each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, and have issued our report thereon dated May 8, 2012,
which contained unqualified opinions on those financial statements. Our audit was performed for the
purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements as a whole. The Schedule of Expenditures of
Federal Awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by OMB Circular A-133,
Audits of States, Local Governments and Nonprofit Organizations, and is also not a required part of the
financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and
relate directly to, the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements.
The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial
statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information
directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the
financial statements themselves, and other procedures in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
auditing standards. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects in relation to
the financial statements as a whole.
6
KD\T
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council,management and state and
federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by
anyone other than these specified parties.
KERN, DEWENTER, VIERE, LTD.
St. Cloud, Minnesota
May 8, 2012
7
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133
December 31,2011
SECTION I—SUMMARY OF AUDITOR'S RESULTS
Financial Statements
Type of auditor's report issued: Unqualified
Internal control over financial reporting:
• Material weakness(es)identified? No
• Significant deficiency(ies) identified that are
not considered to be material weakness(es)? No
Noncompliance material to financial statements
noted? No
Federal Awards
Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for
major programs: Unqualified
Internal control over major programs:
• Material weakness(es)identified? No
• Significant deficiency(ies) identified that are
not considered to be material weakness(es)? No
Any audit findings disclosed that are required to
be reported in accordance with Section 510(a)
of OMB Circular A-133? No
Identification of Major Programs
CFDA No.: 81.128
Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Recovery Act Energy Efficiency and
Conservation Block Grant Program
14.218
Community Development Block Grant
Dollar threshold used to distinguish
between type A and type B programs: $ 300,000
Auditee qualified as low risk auditee? Yes
8
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133
December 31,2011
SECTION II—FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS
None
SECTION III—FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
None
9
KD\hfr -
Expert advice. When you need it.'
REPORT ON LEGAL COMPLIANCE
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities,the business-type activities,
each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2011,which collectively comprise the City's basic financial
statements and have issued our report thereon dated May 8, 2012.
We conducted our audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the
provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, promulgated by
the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sec. 6.65. Accordingly, the audit included such tests of
the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.
The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions covers seven categories of
compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public
indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions and Tax Increment Financing. Our
study included all of the listed categories.
The results of our tests indicate that for the items tested, the City complied with the material terms and
conditions of applicable legal provisions.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council, management and the
Office of the State Auditor, and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.
U... 1, GAP
KERN, DEWENTER, VIERE, LTD.
St. Cloud,Minnesota
May 8, 2012
10
ITEM NO.: VI.A.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP & OPEN PODIUM
TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2012 CITY CENTER
5:00—6:25 PM, HERITAGE ROOMS
6:30—7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBER
CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad Aho, Sherry Butcher
Wickstrom, Kathy Nelson, and Ron Case
CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Police Chief Rob Reynolds, Fire Chief George
Esbensen, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah,
Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, Communications Manager Joyce Lorenz, City
Attorney Ric Rosow, and Recorder Lorene McWaters
Workshop-Heritage Room II
Council Member Nelson was absent.
I. STRATEGIC PLAN FOR HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT—PART III
City Manager Rick Getschow said this workshop is the third in a series of three to update
the City Council about housing and economic development initiatives and obtain input
and direction from the Council for the new strategic plan. Community Development
Director Janet Jeremiah reviewed timing, priority and funding for projects in four areas:
Southwest LRT, MCA/Town Center, Economic Development and Housing. Jeremiah
also reviewed balances and projections for TIF and Economic Development funds.
Jeremiah said staff is specifically looking for input on the following questions:
• MCA Streetscape/Wayfinding
• Continue $400,000 per year maximum from Economic Development Fund?
• Continue policy of public/private funding partnership at 80% contribution from
businesses and 20% contribution from the City?
• Pursue buy-in for larger special service districts or work with redevelopment
only?
• MCA Public Art(or TOD or City-Wide?)
• Should staff pursue more aggressively?
• Make part of development requirements or create incentives?
• Town Center Land Use Regulations
• Step back from policy to proactively rezone to match the comp plan?
• Consider comp plan text to rezone most when redevelopment proposed? (Allow
most to have additions under current zoning?)
• Transportation Projects for Economic Development
• Is the Shady Oak Bridge the priority for TIF Pooled Funds/project amendment?
• Singletree Lane Phase II Reconstruction
City Council Workshop Minutes
May 1, 2012
Page 2
• Should the Singletree—W. 78th Street Realignment be considered in association
with LRT alternatives?
■ Housing
• Extend affordability of existing TIF housing projects?
• Pursue acquisition from MNDOT/Grants/RFP for Scenic Heights Green Mid-
Market Single-Family Neighborhood?
• Consider rehab assistance and new affordability requirements for Chestnut
Apartments?
City Council Feedback
Mayor Tyra-Lukens said $400,000 seems like a reasonable amount for the MCA
streetscape/wayfinding, but does not want to see the City get boxed in by a particular
number. Council Member Aho said the 80/20 private/public partnership seems
reasonable. Jeremiah said feedback from the Chamber of Commerce and some
businesses is that an 80 private contribution is too high. Tyra-Lukens said special service
districts might make sense one LRT is in place. Aho said a special service district might
be appropriate in conjunction with a redevelopment project.
Council Member Butcher Wickstrom asked if the City has a public art policy. Parks and
Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer said staff is currently looking at public art in
conjunction with future LRT stations. Tyra-Lukens said she wants to pursue public art
and water elements because they can help create a downtown feel; however, she does not
favor an aggressive approach. She suggested using incentives, such as density increases
or setbacks. Aho said he would expand the discussion of public art to include entrance
monuments. Tyra-Lukens suggested looking at what policies other cities are using to
encourage public art. Council Member Case suggested bringing the Heritage
Preservation Commission into the public art discussion. He feels they could helpful in
identifying the City's "icons."
Jeremiah asked if the Council feels it makes sense to move forward on neighborhood
commercial in southwest Eden Prairie. Council Member Case asked where it would be
located. City Planner Mike Franzen said there are six or seven sites along Pioneer trail
that might work; however there may be issues with established land uses.
Jeremiah said current the current funding scenario has $2 million going toward
construction of the Shady Oak Bridge, leaving only $500,000 for other transportation
projects. She asked how Council feels about that. Aho said the Shady Oak Bridge is a
critical project, and encouraged staff to look at how the City can support getting it done.
Mayor Tyra-Lukens said she would like to see the Singletree Phase 2 Reconstruction
Project put off until it can be done in conjunction with LRT.
City Council Workshop Minutes
May 1, 2012
Page 3
Jeremiah asked whether or not the Council is interested in extending TIF affordable
housing districts. Tyra-Lukens said she would like to know how much it would cost and
whether or not it would count toward our Met Council affordable housing goals.
Jeremiah asked whether or not the Council wants staff to pursue acquisition of the Scenic
Heights parcel from MNDOT for a green neighborhood development. Tyra-Lukens asked
if there are grants available. Jeremiah said it may qualify for a Livable Communities
grant. Aho said he prefers that the City not buy the parcel. He would rather use
incentives to encourage an independent developer.
Tyra-Lukens said she agrees that rehab assistance for Chestnut Apartments should remain
a medium priority.
Open Podium - Council Chamber
II. OPEN PODIUM
III. ADJOURNMENT
ITEM NO.: VI.B.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY,MAY 1,2012 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad
Aho, Sherry Butcher Wickstrom, Ron Case, and
Kathy Nelson
CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Public Works Director
Robert Ellis, Community Development Director Janet
Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay
Lotthammer, City Attorney Ric Rosow and Council
Recorder Jan Curielli
I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Tyra-Lukens called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. All Council Members were
present.
II. COLOR GUARD/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. OPEN PODIUM INVITATION
IV. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS
A. SENIOR AWARENESS PROCLAMATION
Mayor Tyra-Lukens read a proclamation proclaiming May 2012 as Senior
Awareness month. Jacque Tornoe, Senior Center Advisory Committee, reviewed
the activities scheduled during Senior Awareness month.
B. TOUR DE TONKA
Tim Litfin, Minnetonka Community Education Director, gave a PowerPoint
overview of the upcoming Tour de Tonka that will be held Saturday, August 4. He
presented a plaque to Mayor Tyra-Lukens honoring Eden Prairie's support of the
Tour de Tonka.
V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Tyra-Lukens added Item XIV.A.1.
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Aho, to approve the agenda as
amended. Motion carried 5-0.
VI. MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 1,2012
Page 2
A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 2012
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Nelson, to approve the minutes of the Council
workshop held Tuesday, April 17, 2012 as published. Motion carried 5-0.
B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,APRIL 17, 2012
MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Case, to approve the minutes of the City
Council meeting held Tuesday, April 17, 2012 as published. Motion carried 5-0.
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. APPROVE SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 9-2012 ADDING
CITY CODE SECTION 5.74 RELATING TO REGULATING USE OF
COAL TAR-BASED SEALER PRODUCTS AND ADOPT RESOLUTION
NO. 2012-73 APPROVING SUMMARY ORDINANCE FOR PUBLICATION
B. APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HTPO FOR
CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
C. APPROVE PROPOSAL FROM ALLIED WASTE FOR CITY CLEANUP
D. APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BARR
ENGINEERING FOR REPAIRS OF TWO STORMWATER TREATMENT
AREAS SOUTH OF RIVERVIEW ROAD
E. APPROVE PLAN AND SPECS FOR FLYING CLOUD DRIVE SANTITARY
SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT
F. AWARD 2012 BITUMINOUS CRACKSEALING PROJECT
G. AWARD PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE WATERMAIN PROJECT TO
PARROTT
H. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2012-74 GRANTING UNITED HEALTHCARE
SERVICES INC. A VARIANCE FROM CITY CODE SECTION 12.50
SUBD.4B. FOR CITY WEST CORPORATE ADDITION
I. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2012-75 APPROVING CONSTRUCTION
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY AND THE
CITY OF MINNETONKA FOR THE NORTHERN SEGEMENT OF SHADY
OAK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
J. PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL
PARAPROFESSIONALS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 1,2012
Page 3
K. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2012-76 AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF
EASEMENTS FOR FLYING CLOUD DRIVE SANITARY SEWER
REPLACEMENT PROJECT
MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Case, to approve Items A-K on the Consent
Calendar. Motion carried 5-0.
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
A. EDENDALE PARKING EXPANSION & SITE IMPROVEMENT by Edendale
Residence Inc. Request for: Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on
3.25 acres, Planned Unit District Review with waivers on 3.25 acres, Zoning
District Amendment within the RM-2.5 Zoning District on 3.25 acres and Site Plan
Review on 3.25 acres. Location: 16700 Main St. (Resolution for PUD Concept
Review)
Getschow said official notice of this public hearing was published in the April 19,
2012,Eden Prairie News and sent to 48 property owners. Edendale has 61 units, but
only 40 existing parking spaces. Edendale wants to add 22 parking spaces and a 2 car
garage. These are permitted uses in the RM-2.5 Zoning District. The parking and the
garage meet the required setbacks. The proposed screening plan for the single family
homes to the north is a 6 foot high fence and tree replacement. The Planning
Commission first reviewed this project at the March 26, 2012 meeting and continued
discussion to allow the applicant to meet with the neighbors to the north about the
proposed screening plan. At the April 9, 2012 meeting the Planning Commission
voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the plan which had been revised to include a 6
foot high fence, earth tone colors for the garage, and shorter light poles.
Wade Johnson, Outland Builders, reviewed the project. He said the additional
parking will be built on the eastern portion of the property. There will be a rain
garden to control storm water runoff. In addition to the 6 foot high fence, they will
place trees for screening along the fence. They also plan to clean up some issues that
exist from the original construction and replace the berm with a retaining wall.
Gerald Beauvais, 7735 Meadow Lane, said he owns the property directly to the north
of the project. When Edendale first went up it was the highest building in Eden
Prairie, and it looked straight down onto his home. At that time they asked for some
sort of berming to help hide the building. Some shrubs and trees were put in by the
builder; however, the trees died. There is now some growth filling in that area, but
that will come out because of putting in the parking lot. He would like the parking lot
to be placed as far away from his property as possible. He got a copy of the revised
plan from the Planning Department, but he could not tell where the trees and shrubs
will be placed. He would prefer this to be a single loaded parking lot that was moved
further to the south away from his property.
Tyra-Lukens said the plan looks tight for emergency vehicle access. Jeremiah said it
isn't too late to consider other options. She suggested they could work with the
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 1,2012
Page 4
developer on an alternative plan. She thought there is some purpose for a senior
building to have a drop-off area. Staff believes it may be possible to configure the
plan in a way to conserve more of the woods and move it back from the residential
area.
Tyra-Lukens asked if the tree mass would be removed for the parking lot. Johnson
said it would. He said they did a number of studies trying to show a single loaded
parking option further to the south; however, the area to the south is loaded with
large trees so the tree replacement becomes insurmountable. He said the turn-around
is non-negotiable because there are often deliveries made to the building. Parking to
the west of the building is not a viable option.
Basil Wissner, 8293 Mitchell Road, said a shopping bus that requires a large turn
around makes regular stops at Edendale. The bus would not be able to serve the
community if the turnaround is eliminated. There are also a lot of Metro Mobility
buses that use the turnaround area. He recommended three or four of the parking
spots in front of the building be moved to the north and east and that would get all
the spots they need.
Mr. Beauvais said the parking lot and the new garage will be right behind his
bedroom. He also saw the garage as a possible food and beverage outlet for this
building and he would like them to provide a written statement that would not
occur. Barbara Kuhlman, Director of Operations for Edendale, said it would not be
their intent to ever create a concession stand or to use the structure for storing food
or beverages. Their events are held on the patio. She did not feel they would ever
be bad neighbors, but to provide a written statement about the usage would be an
unreasonable constraint.
Mr. Beauvais said this is not a neighborhood, rather it is an apartment building that
has 60 residents and is 20 feet away from the back lot line. He asked that they put
some sort of shrubs and trees to help block the back of the garage.
Nelson asked what use they envision for the two-car garage. Kuhlman said it will
be used for storage and maintenance work because their building has no storage for
seasonal decorations or maintenance equipment. It would mainly be used during
business hours.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Nelson, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried 5-0.
Another member of the audience stated their desire to speak on the project.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Nelson, to reopen the public hearing. Motion
carried 5-0.
Mary Beth Rojina said she lives in the cul-de-sac next to Mr. Beauvais. She said the
lights from seven of the parking spaces will be beaming into her living room if the
parking lot is built along the north edge. She asked if the fence could be angled
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 1,2012
Page 5
northwest so she does not get the light beams. Johnson replied the fence will be along
the north edge. Tyra-Lukens asked if screening of the angled parking spaces would
help. Ms Rojina said that would help.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Aho, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried 5-0.
Case said this is the kind of transition between zoning areas that we try to avoid in
the City. This has high density next to residential areas. Any time changes occur we
need to honor the proponent, but we also owe it to the people that live here to
mitigate the impact as much as possible. By taking out the tree mass he thought it
falls into the proponent's lap to fix that situation. It is in our power to help protect the
residents that are living there. He said he could not find any topography lines on the
northern side on the drawing so he couldn't tell what the grades are. If it is flat, the
lights will go right into Ms Rojina's living room as she has stated. He wanted to make
sure the mitigations are helpful to the people who are impacted. Edendale needs a
parking lot for the residents, and it seems the original project wasn't done adequately.
It feels like there are too many problems with this project so he thought we should
review the project again.
Tyra-Lukens said she agreed. She asked if there were proof of parking requirements
in place when the original proposal was brought forward. Jeremiah did not believe
there was anything in place at the time.
Nelson asked if they looked at a double row of parking spots immediately behind the
long row next to the building. There would need to be an access road behind that but
it might not have to go so far off to the side. The lights would then face the Edendale
building. Jeremiah said she was not sure we have looked at that option,but staff can
look at that before coming back for final approval.
Butcher Wickstrom thought there are so many questions that we need to turn this
back to staff to have them look at it again. The Council has talked about our concerns
and we also received the public comment.
MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Nelson, to direct staff to investigate all options
to accommodate some of the concerns voiced tonight by the residents and the
Council and to bring back the project within the time period allowed. Motion
carried 5-0.
B. THE MEADOWS AT RILEY CREEK 2012 by Marsh Cove, LLC. Request for:
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.03 acres and Preliminary Plat
of 5.03 acres into 12 lots and 1 outlot. Location: 9845 Sky Lane. (Resolution No.
2012-77 for Preliminary Plat)
Getschow said official notice of this public hearing was published in the April 19,
2012,Eden Prairie News and sent to 23 property owners. This is a 12 lot single
family subdivision that conforms to the requirements of the R1-13.5 Zoning
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 1,2012
Page 6
District. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the
project at the April 9, 2012 meeting.
Steve Bona, JMS Custom Homes, said there have been many different iterations of
this project. The current proposal is for 12 lots including the existing home. The
proposed layout does not require any waivers.
Robin Smith, 9765 Sky Lane, said there is an easement required that covers this
property, the Driver property and his property. He said there was some debate as to
whether that piece would be committed to an easement for a future roadway to
develop the property to the north. Rosow said he has drafted and circulated
documents to do what Mr. Smith is talking about. He said the attorney for Mr.
Rempfer told him this afternoon that Mr. Rempfer was not willing to provide the
easement ahead of his closing on the sale to the developer. The area of the
easement would have covered the portion of his property included in the plat to be
dedicated for roadway. Rosow said his understanding was that the transaction
would consist of the three parties coming together at once. He said he had a call
into the City Engineer to discuss that but hasn't heard back from him.
Tyra-Lukens asked if there should be some wording in the motion to address the
concern. Rosow said he did not believe this plat is dependent on that. Tyra-Lukens
asked if the easement would go into effect at closing. Rosow said Mr. Rempfer did
not want to grant the easements ahead of his development unless all three parties
granted it at the same time.
Mr. Bona said Mr. and Mrs. Rempfer were out of town when the plan to arrange for
the easements was put together. The Planning Commission recommended approval
of the plat stating that this triangular piece of property should be included as right-
of-way for the future road. The Rempfer property is not landlocked from the public
right of way. He is working with other property owners to coordinate the easement.
He believes Mr. Smith and Mr. Driver will sign agreements and place them in the
title company until all parties sign. He said they are dedicating that piece of
property for public right of way.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to close the public
hearing; to approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development
District Review with waivers, and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5
on 5.03 acres; to adopt Resolution No. 2012-77 for Preliminary Plat on 5.03 acres
into 12 lots; and to direct staff to prepare a development agreement incorporating
staff and commission recommendations and Council conditions.
Case said he thought we recently had some stipulation with Hennepin Village Site B
that they would fix Eden Prairie Road if they damaged it during their construction.
He noted this project is about 25% of the impact of that project, so he asked if there
is anything in here similar to the agreement with Hennepin Site B. He also asked
what the future plan is for redoing Eden Prairie Road. Ellis replied the development
agreement for Hennepin Site B required inspection of Eden Prairie Road during their
construction; however, there will be a lot more construction traffic with that
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 1,2012
Page 7
development because of Prospect Road construction. He didn't think there is a need
to add additional cost to future projects that come forward. The permanent
assessments for improvements with Eden Prairie Road will be shared by all of the
neighborhoods in the area.
Case noted Hennepin Village Site B was 52 homes but this is 12 lots, so it has to be a
significant chunk of what the impact of Hennepin Site B would be. We could be
setting a precedent that says only Hennepin Site B has the burden of dealing with it.
Ellis said the developer of Hennepin Village Site B is aware they have a burden of
some additional costs because they were the first to develop the property.
Nelson asked if the 12 properties will be done with wells and septic systems. Ellis
said Sky Lane has City services available so the project will have City services.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried 5-0.
X. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Case, to approve the payment of
claims as submitted. Motion was approved on a roll call vote,with Aho, Butcher
Wickstrom, Case,Nelson and Tyra-Lukens voting "aye."
XI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
XII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
XIII. APPOINTMENTS
XIV. REPORTS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
1. Town Hall Meetings--Mayor Tyra-Lukens
Tyra-Lukens said we planned to have three town hall meetings this year. The
second one will be held Thursday, May 24 at the Star Bank Community
Room from 7:30 to 9:00 AM and will focus on business issues. She noted
anyone in the community is welcome to attend.
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
C. REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
1. Update on Traffic Related Issues
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 1,2012
Page 8
Ellis said Council Members brought up a number of traffic related issues at
the last meeting.
Flashing yellow arrow signal intersections: Ellis said there are currently six
intersections in Eden Prairie with the flashing yellow arrow signals. The City
partnered with Hennepin County for five of the intersections. The County
provided the labor needed to install the equipment while the City funded the
equipment. He said staff will continue to work with MnDOT and Hennepin
County on this. Four or five more retrofits are planned for 2012. He noted the
expense to install them depends on the retrofit required. They are very
popular, but not all intersections will be good candidates for the retrofit.
Bottleneck at Hwy 5 and 212 merge area: Ellis said staff does not know the
exact solution for this problem, but they do know it exists. It will take some
detailed traffic modeling to analyze the situation, but they believe it should be
studied along with the proposed SWLRT alignment. Staff will consider how
best to pursue this issue.
Interstate 494 at Flying Cloud Drive: Ellis said they asked MnDOT to
examine the vehicle detectors to make sure they are working properly. This
intersection is one of 30 other signalized intersections in the Major Center
Area that are coordinated together. They will take a closer look at it.
Preserve Boulevard and Anderson Lakes Parkway: Ellis said they have a
project in the CIP for 2016 or 2017 to add a southbound lane on Preserve
Boulevard and a possible second left turn receiving lane on Anderson Lakes
Parkway. They believe the improvements underway on I-494 and Hwy 169
may change traffic patterns in this area, so they are waiting to review the
situation once those improvements are completed.
Nelson said that corner is very dangerous to the point where most of the
neighborhood avoids that corner. She didn't think anyone would let a child
cross to the school by themselves at that intersection because so few people
stop. There is a lot more involved to this corner than just traffic backup. An
extra lane wouldn't add to the safety at the intersection. Before any
construction is started, we need to look into the situation at that corner. She
urged staff to take a closer look and consider some signage at the intersection.
Case said we should not wait until 2016. It is a badly backed up intersection
at rush hour.
Ellis said staff can take a look to see if there are intermediate measures to
take.
Spring Road and Prospect Road: Ellis said the traffic study showed this
intersection does not meet signal warrants, nor is it even close to meeting
those. It is a Hennepin County jurisdiction highway. There was one minor
vehicle accident at the intersection in the past three years. There is a marked
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 1,2012
Page 9
crosswalk, and it is adequately signed. Staff would like to wait to see what
happens with the Prospect Road connection as it might be a little premature to
put in anything like a flashing amber beacon or a traffic signal at this point.
Future traffic signal needs: Ellis said we have 75 traffic signals in Eden
Prairie now, and every intersection that warrants one has one in place. In the
future there may be additional signals needed in the Golden Triangle area. At
that point staff would do a traffic study with Hennepin County and MnDOT,
but for now staff feels comfortable signals are in place where they are needed.
Aho noted the signal at Valley View and Topview is one of the old style
signals, and asked what it would take to get that updated. Ellis said they have
talked about a possible jurisdictional swap with Hennepin County for Shady
Oak Road and Valley View Road. The upgrade would cost $100,000-
200,000, so it is scheduled out a number of years.
Nelson said she has heard complaints about the long wait times going out of
Hennepin Technical College onto Flying Cloud Drive. She asked if there is
anything that could be done to get more turn time there so students don't have
to wait so long to leave the school. Ellis said staff could contact Hennepin
Tech and see when their release times are scheduled. Nelson said that would
be good.
Tyra-Lukens thanked Mr. Ellis for his presentation.
F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF
G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF
H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
XV. OTHER BUSINESS
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to adjourn the City Council
Meeting. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Tyra-Lukens adjourned the meeting at 8:23 PM.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: May 15, 2012
SECTION: Reports of Advisory Boards & Commissions
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: VII.A.
Community Development/Planning Flying Cloud Airport Advisory
Janet Jeremiah Commission 2011 Report and 2012
Scott Kipp Goals and Work Plan
Requested Action
Move to: Receive the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission 2011 Report and Approve
its 2012 Goals and Work Plan.
Synopsis
The Annual Report addresses activities of the Commission in 2011 which focused on education and
information about Flying Cloud Airport to various constituent groups, to increase visibility of and
communications from the Commission, and to continue to monitor the Final Agreement. The
Commission proposes similar goals for 2012, which include working to reduce nighttime noise and
work with the City and MAC to improve the appearance of the airport.
The Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission will be meeting with the City Council at the
May 15, 2012 City Council Workshop to present its 2011 Report and 2012 Goals and Work Plan.
Some of the Commission's 2011 activities and areas of review included the following:
• Focus on reducing nighttime noise and Helicopter complaints.
• 2011 Update to the Flying Cloud Airport Security Guide.
• MAC landscaping and aesthetic improvements on south side of airport.
• Continue improvements to, and use of, the City's website on Flying Cloud Airport.
• Tour of airport and control tower, and meetings with various businesses on the field.
• Improvements to noise complaint letters.
• MAC/Control Tower established helicopter hovering and pattern work on the airport.
• Monitor the progress of the Flying Cloud Joint Airport Zoning Board.
• 2010 Year End Report and 2011 Goals and Work Plan.
• Students on Commission Representatives.
• Mac/city police mtg on airport security and crime prevention.
• Briefed on new airport watch program.
• Monitoring MAC's Long Term Comprehensive Plan.
• Monitoring the non-aeronautical development.
• Attention to noise complaints.
• Provide noise information on itinerant aircraft.
• Noise complaints at commission meetings addressed.
• Operator of the year.
• Thunderbird Aviation construction.
• Improving pilot education on noise abatement.
• Website improvement.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Calendar May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.:
Christy Weigel, Clerk's License Application List
Police/ Support Unit
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity.
Requested Action
Motion: Approve the licenses listed below
Amendment to Liquor License
2AM Closing Permit - Renewal
Santorini Y Not, Inc.
DBA: Santorini
Raffle
Organization: Starkey Hearing Foundation
Place: Olympic Hills Golf Club
10625 Mount Curve Road
Date: August 3, 2012
Organization: The Eden Prairie Crime Prevention and Criminal Apprehension Fund
Place: Grace Church
9301 Eden Prairie Road
Date: June 11, 2012
- 1 -
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Agenda May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: VIILB.
Community Development/Planning Flying Cloud Landfill Subdivision
Janet Jeremiah/Regina Rojas
Requested Action
Move to: Approve 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2
on 12.4 acres.
Synopsis
This is for second reading of the zoning change to rezone 12 acres of land for Allied Waste
Services' business operations. Since no construction is proposed, a Development Agreement is
not required.
The final plat of 263.32 acres into one lot, and Outlots A and B, and road right of way that would
allow ownership to be transferred to the MPCA, will occur at a subsequent City Council
meeting. A condition of the release of the Final Plat is to provide the City with a cross access and
maintenance agreement Lot 1 and Outlot A. This will allow the MPCA access to Flying Cloud
Drive.
The City is no longer requesting dedication of Outlot B due to the monitoring wells located in
the proposed outlot.
Background Information
The 120-Day Review Period Expires on June 15, 2012.
Attachments
1. Ordinance for Zoning Change
2. Summary Ordinance
FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL SUBDIVISION
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, REMOVING
CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER,
AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT,AND
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 11 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the
"land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the
Rural District and be placed in the I-2 District.
Section 3. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is
removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the I-2 District, and the legal
descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivisionl,
Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled"General Provisions and Definitions
Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99,
"Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated
verbatim herein.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and
publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the
17th day of April, 2012, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as
attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 15th day of May,
2012.
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on , 2012.
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Proposed Land to be rezoned from Rural to I-2 (Industrial Park)
Lot 1, Block 1, FLYING CLOUD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof', Hennepin
County, Minnesota, except those parts of said Lot 1 previously removed from the Rural District
and included in the I-2 Park District.
/ /
//�1 / Z- N ZONING SKETCH
,,,111 'J/NG
0 200 400 / PROPOSED LAND TO BE REZONED FROM
/ RURAL TO I-2 INDUSTRIAL PARK
SCALE IN FEET /�• I-2 Zd✓fPE
/ 1 �hPPRO%IMAIE-PER MAP] Lot I.Block I.FLYING CLOUD ADDITION.
Hen to thmy recorded plot thereof.
/ Hennepinrtsofold County.Minnesota,except those
ports of said Lot previously removed 2m
/ the Rural clstrict and included in the1-2
��J Pork District.
n1I Note: The plot of FLYING CLOUD ADDITION
1.
hos not been flied us of June 8.2011
���G ///yy
��41G /�-f' 1. ZONING
ll� / DENOTES LAND TO BE REZ DNED FROM
4IP •i RURAL TO I-2(INDUSTRIAL PARK}
j' AREA, 540.000Y-sq,ft.or 12.4i-acres
------------------
4 N • ADDITION- --
r I hereby certlty that this sketch,plan,or report wa s prepared.by me ar un tler my tllrect supervision antl
that am a tluly,Licensed Land.Surveyor under the
11 laws of the State of Mln neota.
j ALA7A RI•
I Dated this 8th day of June,2011
Na SUNCE LAND SURVEYIN LLC.
\ ,_ PRE• r BY
..,n,....
P
k S.Honson,P.L.S. Minn.Llc, No, 154811
40\ - /
0,11 FYRAL ZONING 0 \vv/
RURAL WING ssSUNDE sm Mom
0FF:
DWSIIXYSYfNG eez-eei-za'sin ern«Ieso-�a al 11B
mio_ men3.is�°.g.n,mia.namip,,.,p or=
r.a.m.. y,Perk.Minn.7ez-769-.1e
FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL SUBDIVISION
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE NO. 10-2012
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA,
REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND
PLACING IT IN ANOTHER,AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF
LAND IN EACH DISTRICT,AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS,
CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA,
ORDAINS:
Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at 9813 Flying
Cloud Drive, from Rural to I-2 Zoning District. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance,
gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on , 2012.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Agenda May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: VIII.C.
Community Development/Planning Hennepin Village Site B Toll 2012
Janet Jeremiah/Michael Franzen
Requested Action
Move to:
• Approve 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review and
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5; and
• Approve the Development Agreement for Hennepin Village Site B Toll 2012; and
• Approve and Authorize Issuance of a Grading Permit for Hennepin Village Site B
Toll 2012, subject to release by the City Engineer upon determination that the final
contract documents conform to plans stamp dated March 20, 2012, as approved by
the City Council.
Synopsis
This is final approval of a plan for 52 single family lots.
Background Information
The 120-Day Review Period Expires on May 19, 2012.
Attachments
1. Ordinance for PUD District Review
2. Summary Ordinance
3. Development Agreement
HENNEPIN VILLAGE SITE B TOLL 2012
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 11-2012-PUD-6-2012
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, REMOVING
CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER,
AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT,AND,
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the
"land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the
Rural Zoning District and be placed in the R1-13.5 Zoning District 12-2012-PUD-6-2012
(hereinafter "PUD-6-20 1 2-R1-13.5").
Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain
Development Agreement dated as of May 15, 2012 entered into between Toll, Inc, and the City
of Eden Prairie, (hereinafter"Development Agreement"). The Development Agreement contains
the terms and conditions of PUD-6-2012-R1-13.5, and are hereby made a part hereof.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. PUD-6-2012-R1-13.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive
Guide Plan of the City.
B. PUD-6-2012-R1-13.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and
unified environment within its own boundaries.
C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City
Code that are contained in PUD-6-2012-R1-13.5 are justified by the design of the
development described therein.
D. PUD-6-2012-R1-13.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its
construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete unit without
dependence upon any subsequent unit.
Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is
removed from the Rural Zoning District, and placed in the R1-13.5 Zoning District and shall be
included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-6-2012-R1-13.5 and the legal
descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1,
subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly.
Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled"General Provisions and Definitions
Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled
"Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated
verbatim herein.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and
publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the
20th day of March, 2012, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as
attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 15th day of May,
2012.
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on , 2012.
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of Area to be Rezoned
All of the following described Parcels 1,2,3,and 4:
Parcel 1:
Outlot A and Lot 3,Block 1,SPRING HEIGHTS,according to the recorded plat thereof,Hennepin
County,Minnesota.
Parcel 2:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29,Township 116,Range 22,
Hennepin County,Minnesota,lying Northwesterly of the centerline of Hennepin County State Aid
Highway No.4. Excepting therefrom the following described tract:Commencing at the Northeast
corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter;thence on a assumed bearing of South,
along the East line thereof,a distance of 522.70 feet to the actual point of beginning:thence
continue South,along said East line,a distance of 383.94 feet;thence North 15 degrees,46 minutes,
19 seconds West,a distance of 358.33 feet;thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning.
Parcel 3:
Tracts A and B,Registered Land Survey No.465,Files of the Registrar of Titles,Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
Parcel 4:
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 29,Township 116,Range 22,
lying Easterly of the centerline of Village Road(now Eden Prairie Road), Northerly of Registered Land
Survey No.465,and Southerly of line described as commencing at the Southeast corner of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter;thence North,along the East line of said Southeast
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter,a distance of 681.13 feet to the point of beginning of the line to
be described;thence Westerly,deflecting to the left 87 degrees,43 minutes,44 seconds,a distance
of 1316.94 feet,more or less,to the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
and there terminating.
EXCEPT that part thereof described as lying southeasterly,easterly,and southerly of the following
described line:
Commencing at the southwest corner of said Outlot A,SPRING HEIGHTS;thence on an assumed
bearing of South 89 degrees 00 minutes 39 seconds East,along the south line of said Outlot A,a
distance of 249.68 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described;thence North 32
degrees 36 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 554.02 feet;thence North 29 degrees 10 minutes
34 seconds East a distance of 109.92 feet;thence North 15 degrees 48 minutes 48 seconds East a
distance of 119.82 feet;thence North 03 degrees 36 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 107.39
feet;thence North 04 degrees 57 minutes 46 seconds West a distance of 268.00 feet;thence on a
bearing of North a distance of 479.07 feet;thence North 40 degrees 18 minutes 28 seconds West a
distance of 141.48 feet;thence South 86 degrees 45 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 101.61
feet;thence northeasterly a distance of 129.79 feet along a tangential curve concave to the
northwest having a radius of 274.00 feet and a central angle of 27 degrees 08 minutes 24 seconds;
thence North 66 degrees 06 minutes 17 seconds East,tangent to the last described curve,a distance
of 130.48 feet;thence northeasterly a distance of 157.92 feet along a tangential curve concave to
the northwest having a radius of 254.00 feet and a central angle of 35 degrees 37 minutes 24
seconds;thence northeasterly a distance of 122.28 feet along a reverse curve concave to the
southeast having a radius of 196.00 feet and a central angle of 35 degrees 44 minutes 45 seconds;
thence North 66 degrees 13 minutes 39 seconds East,tangent to the last described curve,a distance
of 212.98 feet to the easterly line of the above-described Parcel 3,and said line there terminating.
ALSO EXCEPT that part thereof described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of the above-described Parcel 4;thence on an assumed bearing of
South 00 degrees 15 minutes 42 seconds West,along said east line of the southeast quarter of the
northeast quarter,a distance of 263.91 feet;thence South 66 degrees 13 minutes 39 seconds West
a distance of 237.06 feet;thence southwesterly a distance of 155.97 feet along a tangential curve
concave to the southeast having a radius of 250.00 feet and a central angle of 35 degrees 44
minutes 45 seconds;thence southwesterly a distance of 124.35 feet along a reverse curve concave
to the northwest having a radius of 200.00 and a central angle of 35 degrees 37 minutes 24 seconds;
thence South 66 degrees 06 minutes 17 seconds West,tangent to the last described curve,a
distance of 130.48 feet;thence southwesterly a distance of 104.21 feet along a tangential curve
concave to the northwest having a radius of 220.00 feet and a central angle of 27 degrees 08
minutes 24 seconds;thence North 86 degrees 45 minutes 18 seconds West,tangent to the last
described curve,a distance of 200.14 feet;thence northwesterly a distance of 114.42 feet along a
tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 220.00 feet and a central angle of 29
degrees 47 minutes 58 seconds;thence North 56 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds East,tangent to
the last described curve,a distance of 75.04 feet;thence northwesterly a distance of 53.68 feet
along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 280.00 feet and a central angle
of 10 degrees 59 minutes 01 seconds;thence North 16 degrees 56 minutes 18 seconds East,not
tangent to the last described curve,a distance of 68.25 feet;thence northeasterly a distance of
43.79 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 35.00 feet and a
central angle of 71 degrees 41 minutes 02 seconds;thence North 86 degrees 37 minutes 20 seconds
East,tangent to the last described curve,a distance of 64.95 feet;thence southeasterly a distance of
61.87 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 50.00 feet,a
central angle of 70 degrees 54 minutes 03 seconds,and a chord of 58.00 feet which bears South 66
degrees 49 minutes 41 seconds East;thence South 12 degrees 16 minutes 43 seconds East,not
tangent to the last described curve,a distance of 130.00 feet;thence North 66 degrees 13 minutes
42 seconds East a distance of 106.16 feet;thence North 34 degrees 10 minutes 04 seconds East a
distance of 105.51 feet;thence North 00 degrees 54 minutes 27 seconds West a distance of 112.25
feet;thence North 37 degrees 06 minutes 17 seconds West a distance of 112.25 feet;thence North
66 degrees 58 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 100.15 feet;thence South 81 degrees 44
minutes 22 seconds West a distance of 179.27 feet;thence South 68 degrees 24 minutes 18 seconds
West a distance of 201.14 feet to the easterly right of way line of Eden Prairie Road per Document
No.3617459;thence northerly,along said easterly right of way line to the northerly line of said
Parcel 4;thence easterly along the northerly line of said Parcel 4 to the point of beginning.
C;:\Uocurnenfs gad$crung,\AM:11211Nt1>cal Sci'ru^,-\1'canprttry lin:Inct}it.,.Cc,ucni.()uflool<\7i)ila/ixl\%m tDa.:crij.77cn [Of l mu -l .._
HENNEPIN VILLAGE SITE B TOLL 2012
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE NO. 11-2012-PUD-6-2012
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING
CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER,
AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located east of Eden Prairie Road
and south and west of Riley Creek from the Rural Zoning District to the R1-13.5 Zoning District
on 71.5 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this
property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on , 2012.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.)
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
HENNEPIN VILLAGE SITE B TOLL 2012
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into as of May 15,
2012,by Toll MN. L.P.,a Minnesota limited partnership,hereinafter referred to as"Developer,"its
successors and assigns, and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation,hereinafter
referred to as "City":
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied for a Planned Unit Development Concept Review on
71.5 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 71.5 acres,Zoning District
Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 24.37 acres,Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.8
acres, and Preliminary Plat of 71.5 acres into 52 lots and 3 outlots, legally described on Exhibit A
(the "Property");
NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. for
Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Ordinance No. for Planned Unit
Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5, and Resolution
No. for Preliminary Plat, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the
Property as follows:
1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised
and stamp dated March 20, 2012,reviewed and approved by the City Council on March 20.
2012, (hereinafter the "Plans") and identified on Exhibit B, subject to such changes and
modifications as provided herein.
2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set
forth in Exhibit C.
3. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR CODE VIOLATIONS: In the event of a
violation of City Code relating to use of the Land construction thereon or failure to fulfill an
obligation imposed upon the Developer pursuant to this Agreement,City shall give 24 hour
notice of such violation in order to allow Developer to commence a cure of such violation,
provided however, City need not issue a building or occupancy permit for construction or
occupancy on the Land while such a violation is continuing,unless waived by City.
The existence of a violation of City Code or the failure to perform or fulfill an obligation
required by this Agreement shall be reasonably determined solely and conclusively by the
City Manager of the City or a designee.
4. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer shall
release,defend and indemnify City,its elected and appointed officials,employees and agents
from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including
attorneys' fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors,
omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants,contractors,subcontractors,suppliers and
agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and
indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City.
5. DEED OF PARK LAND: Developer shall deed to the City for park purposes proposed
Outlots A and B. Developer shall submit a Warranty Deed for review and written
approval by the City Attorney, for Outlots A and B. After approval by the City Attorney,
Developer shall file the Warranty Deed with the Hennepin County Recorder/Registrar of
Title as appropriate immediately after the recording of the final plat and prior to recording
of any document affecting the property including but not limited to any mortgage granted
by the Developer or owners, their successors and/or assigns.
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit
to the City Attorney proof that the Warranty Deed has been recorded in the Hennepin
County Recorder's Office/Registrar of Titles' Office.
6. DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION REGARDING FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT: No
lot shall be sold or transferred to the first intended residential homeowner,nor an agreement
entered into to construct a home on any lot within the development unless the Developer or
its successors and/or assigns personally delivers prior to execution of a purchase agreement
or an agreement to construct a home on the lot (whichever comes first), a disclosure
statement in form and substance as attached as Exhibit D hereto regarding the Flying Cloud
Airport. If the initial purchaser of a lot from the Developer is not the initial intended
homeowner of a residence to be constructed on the lot,Developer shall require by contractual
obligation with its initial purchaser the delivery of the disclosure statement to the initial
intended residential homeowner prior to execution by the intended homeowner of any
agreement to construct a home or agreement to purchase a lot (whichever comes first).
7. EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD CONSTRUCTION: The Developer shall grant,at no cost to the
City,temporary construction easements necessary in City's judgment to construct the Eden
Prairie Road Improvements with such temporary easements to be of reasonable scope and for
a reasonable term. Developer shall convey,at no cost to the City,the temporary construction
easements within 30 days of request by City.
8. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
PLANS:
A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading
and drainage plan contained in the Plans is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land
alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City
Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The
final grading and drainage plan shall include all wetland information, including
wetland boundaries,wetland buffer strips and wetland buffer monument locations;all
Stormwater Facilities, such as water quality ponding areas, stormwater detention
areas, and stormwater infiltration systems; and any other items required by the
application for and release of a land alteration permit. All design calculations for
storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted
with the final grading and drainage plan. Prior to release of the grading bond,
Developer shall certify to the City that the Stormwater Facilities conform to the final
grading plan and that the Stormwater Facilities are functioning in accordance with the
approved plans.
Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan.
The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved
final grading plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP). The design
professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the
grading in conformance the approved final grading plan and SWPPP. In addition,the
design professional retained by the Developer to perform the monitoring of the
Project shall be responsible for all monitoring, data entry and reporting to the
PermiTrack ESC web-based erosion and sediment permit tracking program utilized
by the City.
B. STORMWATER FACILITY CONSTRUCTION: Stormwater Facilities, including
detention basins,retention basins, "Stormwater Infiltration"or"Filtration Systems"
(defined to include such items as rainwater gardens, vegetated swales, infiltration
basins,vegetated filters,filter strips,curbless parking lot islands,parking lot islands
with curb-cuts, traffic islands, tree box filters, bioretention systems or infiltration
trenches)or"Underground Systems"(such as media filters,underground sand filters,
underground vaults,sedimentation chambers,underground infiltration systems,pre-
manufactured pipes, modular structures or hydrodynamic separators) shall be
maintained by the Developer during construction and for a minimum of two(2)full
growing seasons after completion of the development to ensure that soil compaction,
erosion, clogging, vegetation loss, channelization of flow or accumulation of
sediment are not occurring,and thereafter by the Owner of the Property.Planting and
Maintenance Plans for the Stormwater Facilities (where appropriate)to ensure that
the Stormwater Facilities continue to function as designed in perpetuity must be
submitted prior to release of the first building permit for the Development
Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan
to monitor construction of the Stormwater Facilities for conformance to the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency publication entitled"State of Minnesota Storm
water Manual" dated November 2005, the approved final grading plan and the
requirements listed herein. All inspections of underground systems shall be
performed by personnel that have approved OSHA confined space training.
Maintenance techniques must be used during construction to protect the infiltration
capacity of all Stormwater Infiltration Systems by limiting soil compaction to the
greatest extent possible. This must include delineation of the proposed infiltration
system with erosion control fencing prior to construction; installation of the
infiltration system using low-impact earth moving equipment; and not allowing
equipment,vehicles, supplies or other materials to be stored or allowed in the areas
designated for stormwater infiltration during construction. The Stormwater
Infiltration Systems must be inspected prior to final grading to ensure that the area is
infiltrating as proposed and to determine if corrective measures are required to allow
infiltration as proposed.
Field verification of post-construction infiltration rates must be provided to the City
within 30 days after the first rainfall event of inch or greater after the Stormwater
Infiltration Systems become operational. If infiltration rates are reduced, a plan to
restore adequate infiltration must be provided within 90-days of the field verification
test. The work required to bring the Stormwater Infiltration System back into
compliance be implemented within 60 days of City approval of the plan. Pervious
surfaces shall be stabilized with seed and mulch or sod and all impervious surfaces
must be completed prior to final grading and planting of the Stormwater Infiltration
Systems.
C. STORMWATER FACILITY INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE
A Stormwater Maintenance Plan must be provided for operation and maintenance of
all Stormwater Facilities to ensure they continue to function as designed in perpetuity
prior to issuance of the Land Alteration Permit. The Stormwater Maintenance Plan
must identify and protect the design, capacity and functionality of all Stormwater
Facilities. The Maintenance Plan must contain at a minimum: the name of the
party(s) or homeowner's association responsible for maintenance, access plans,
inspection frequency; methods used for field verification of infiltration for
Stormwater Infiltration Systems; routine and non-routine inspection procedures;
sweeping frequency for all parking and road surfaces;plans for restoration of reduced
infiltration for Stormwater Infiltration Systems; and plans for replacement of failed
systems, all pursuant to and in accordance with Eden Prairie City Code Section
11.55, Subd. 8.
During construction and for two years following completion of construction, all
Stormwater Facilities shall be inspected at a minimum of once annually to determine
if the Stormwater Facility(s) is treating stormwater as designed and should occur
within 72-hours after a rainfall event of one-inch or greater to verify infiltration. All
Stormwater Facilities shall be kept free of debris,litter,invasive plants and sediment.
Erosion impairing the function or integrity of the Stormwater Facilities,if any,must
be corrected and any structural damage impairing or threatening to impair the
function of the Stormwater Facilities must be repaired. The following criteria must
be included in the inspection:
• A storage treatment basin(including retention and detention basins)shall be
considered inadequate if sediment has decreased the wet storage volume by
50 percent or dry storage volume by 25 percent of its original design volume.
• A Stormwater Infiltration System shall be considered inadequate if sediment
has accumulated that impairs or has the potential to impair infiltration of
stormwater.
• An underground storage chamber shall be considered inadequate if sediment
has decreased the storage volume by 50 percent of its original design volume.
Based on this inspection,if a Stormwater Facility requires cleanout,the Stormwater
Facility shall be restored to its original design and/or the infiltration capacity of the
underlying soils must be restored and any surface disturbance must be stabilized
within one year of the inspection date.
Sediment, debris, litter or vegetation removal in Stormwater Infiltration Systems
shall be by hand or with a flat-bottomed shovel or rake during dry periods. Only
enough sediment shall be removed as needed to restore hydraulic capacity,leaving as
much of the vegetation in place as possible. Any damaged turf or vegetation shall be
reseeded or replaced. Parking lots and drive lanes that drain to any Stormwater
Facility shall be swept at least once weekly during construction and more frequently
as needed to minimize sediment accumulation within the Stormwater Facilities.
After the two year period of maintenance,the Owner of the Property shall continue to
be responsible for maintenance of the Stormwater Facilities. This shall include
inspections at a minimum of once per every five years. Regular maintenance shall be
conducted and must include regular sweeping of private streets,parking lots or drive
aisles at a minimum of once per year; debris and litter removal;removal of noxious
and invasive plants;removal of dead and diseased plants; maintenance of approved
vegetation; re-mulching of void areas; replanting or reseeding areas where dead or
diseased plants were removed;and removal of sediment build-up. Sediment build-up
in above-ground Stormwater Infiltration or Filtration Systems shall be removed by
hand. Areas above Underground Systems shall be kept free of structures that would
limit access to the System for maintenance or replacement.
D. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP): Prior to
issuance of a land alteration permit,Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and
obtain City Engineer's written approval of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) for the Property. The SWPPP shall include all boundary erosion control
features, temporary stockpile locations, turf restoration procedures, concrete truck
washout areas and any other best management practices to be utilized within the
Project. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall complete
implementation of the approved SWPPP.
9. GRADING IN THE WOODED AREAS ON SITE: Prior to grading within any of the
wooded areas on the Property, delineated on Exhibit B, Developer shall submit to the City
Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a plan depicting construction
grading limits on the Property. Prior to the issuance of any land alteration permit,Developer
shall place a construction fence on the approved construction grading limits. Developer shall
notify the City and watershed district 48 hours in advance of grading so that the construction
limit fence may be field inspected and approved by the City Engineer and City Forester.
Developer shall maintain the construction limit fence until written approval is granted by the
City to remove the fence.
10. INTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION PLAN: Prior to issuance of each residential building
permit for the Property,Developer shall submit to the City Building Official,and obtain the
City Building Official's written approval of plans that establish that each residence is
designed to meet the structural performance standards for residential interior sound levels,
depicted in the Metropolitan Council's Transportation Policy Plan, Appendix H,
(Metropolitan Council Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Aircraft Noise) Table 4,
adopted December 15, 2004.
11. MAINTENANCE OF EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD: Any road segment, as identified by the
City Engineer, of Eden Prairie Road used for construction ingress and/or egress (including
dirt hauling operations) south of Riley Creek shall be subject to the following conditions:
• Prior to issuance of a permit by the City for Land Alteration or construction of streets
and utilities for the Property,Developer and the Engineering Division shall perform
an inspection of Eden Prairie Road to determine required maintenance necessary for
Eden Prairie Road. The Developer shall perform all maintenance identified by the
inspection for the construction entrance/exit off of Eden Prairie Road Northerly to the
improved section of Eden Prairie Road prior to the issuance of any permit.
• Developer shall repair any area of Eden Prairie Road south of Riley Creek subject to
construction traffic that develops pavement distress as determined by the City
Engineer.
• Developer shall provide City with a maintenance bond in the amount of$80,000 per
road mile. The Bond shall remain in full force and effect on each road segment for
which reconstruction has not occurred to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, of
Eden Prairie Road used by construction traffic unless the segment is reconstructed by
City to current design standards or until 75% of the lots contain completed and
occupied homes.
• A 6-ton restriction shall remain in effect between March 1 and May 1, each year on
all road segments.
• All construction ingress and egress on Eden Prairie Road shall be to and from the
north.No construction traffic shall utilize Eden Prairie Road south of Prospect Road
until final completion of Eden Prairie Road Improvements by the City.
• The Developer's engineer shall provide to the City Engineer a sight line analysis for
that portion of Eden Prairie Road used for construction access. Areas that are
determined by the City Engineer as deficient in sight lines as a result of obstruction
due to trees, brush, etc. shall be remedied by removal of those obstructions within
public right of way. The analysis and remediation shall occur prior to issuance of any
grading permit where Eden Prairie Road is used for construction access.
12. PROSPECT ROAD CONSTRUCTION: The Developer shall complete construction of
Prospect Road base course/first lift prior to September 1,2013 or prior to the issuance by the
City of any occupancy permits within the Property or whichever occurs first.
Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of Prospect Road,Developer
shall submit to the City Engineer,and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for
the construction of Prospect Road including grading,street,storm sewer and watermain. All
plans for Prospect Road shall be in accordance with the requirements of Paragraph 20.
13. EXISTING PROSPECT ROAD: The Developer is responsible for implementing the sight
line improvements along existing Prospect Road in substantial conformance with the
improvements shown in Exhibit E and subject to final approval by the City Engineer. The
City and Developer acknowledge that this work will also require the approval of the
Hennepin Village Homeowner's Association(hereinafter referred to as HOA)and the City
and Developer agree to work in good faith with the HOA to obtain its approval. The
Developer shall perform the improvements within a reasonable time after obtaining approval.
The Developer shall complete the improvements prior to the opening of Prospect Road and
the issuance by the City of any occupancy permits unless the HOA has not provided its
approval within 120 days of execution of this Agreement at which time the Developer shall
notify the City of the lack of approval and the City may undertake the work. In such case
Developer shall reimburse City for all project expenses including but not limited to property
acquisition, costs of capitalized interest, legal expenses, engineering services, inspection,
testing, City administrative fees and bond placement costs, and remediation of hazardous
waste or contamination. If Developer fails to reimburse City within 30 days of a written
request for payment, City may draw on or make a claim against the bond or other surety
provided as required above.
14. PROPERTY EVALUATION FOR ACTIVE EROSION: The Property shall be evaluated
regarding existing active areas of erosion by a geotechnical engineer retained by the
Developer and approved by the City. Any areas that are experiencing active erosion should
be repaired according to recommendations by the geotechnical engineer and as approved by
the City Engineer and incorporated into the final project grading plan. The repair of these
areas shall occur concurrent with the grading of the Property.
15. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: The city hereby grants the following waivers to City Code
requirements within the R1-13.5 District through the Planned Unit Development District
Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD (list PUD number):
• Lot size less than 13,500 sf. Lots 11-17, 21-23, Block 1. Lots 4, 5, 9, 11, Block 2
• Lot frontage at the right of way less than 85 feet. Lot 9, 10, 19, 25, 26, Block 1.
• Lot frontage at the right of way less than 55 feet on a cul de sac. Lot 6,Block 1;Lots
7, 8, Block 2
• Front yard setback from 30 feet to 20 feet. (all lots)
• Side yard setback from 10 and 15 feet to 8 and 8 feet. (all lots)
16. REMOVAL/SEALING OF EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS: Prior to
issuance by City of any permit for grading or building on the Property, Developer shall
submit to the Chief Building Official and obtain the Chief Building Official's written
approval of plans for demolition and removal of existing septic systems and wells on the
Property, and restoration of the Property.
Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or building on the Property, Developer
shall complete the demolition and removal of existing septic systems and wells on the
Property and restore the Property.
Prior to such demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a deposit in the
amount of$ 1,000 to guarantee that Developer completes implementation of the approved
plan. The city shall return to Developer the $ 1,000 deposit at such time as the Chief
Building Official has verified in writing that the Developer has completed implementation of
the approved plan.
17 RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or
construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and
obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls
identified on the grading plan in the Plans.
These plans shall include details with respect to the height,type of materials,and method of
construction to be used for the retaining walls.
Developer shall complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance
with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of any
occupancy permit for the Property.
18. SIDEWALK AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Prior to issuance by City of any building
permit on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Parks and Recreation
Services and obtain the Director's written approval of detailed plans for sidewalks and trails
to be constructed on the Property. Prior to release of any portion of the final plat,Developer
shall convey to the city easements for such sidewalks and trails in such locations as
determined by the Director of Parks and Recreation Services. Easements will not be required
where sidewalks and trails are located in the Right of Way as determined by the City
Engineer. Sidewalks and trails shall be constructed in the following locations:
A. The Developer is responsible for the construction of a five-foot wide concrete
sidewalk to be located along Street A,Street B, Street C, Street D, Street D,Prospect
Road as depicted in the Plans.
B. The Developer is responsible for the costs for construction of a five-foot concrete
sidewalk to be located along Eden Prairie Road from Prospect Road to Street B. This
sidewalk shall be constructed in conjunction with the future Eden Prairie Road
Improvements. The Special Assessment Agreement for the Property will include
costs for this sidewalk.
C. Developer is responsible for the construction of an eight-foot wide bituminous trail to
be located along Prospect Road and Eden Prairie Road as depicted in the Plans.
After approval by the City, Developer shall file the sidewalk and trail easements with the
Hennepin County Recorder/Registrar of Title as appropriate immediately after the recording
of the final plat and prior to recording of any document affecting the property including but
not limited to any mortgage granted by the Developer or owners, their successors and/or
assigns.
19. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT: Prior to the release of the final plat for the
Property, an assessment agreement, in the form and substance as attached in Exhibit F,with
the City for trunk sewer and water assessments on an assessable area of 28.65 acres in the
amount of$181,978.25 and for Eden Prairie Road street,trail,sidewalk, storm sewer,utility
and water quality improvements in the amount of$1,144,000.00
The City shall reduce trunk assessments to the property by an amount to be determined by the
City Engineer representing the difference in construction cost of 8 inch watermain, valves
and fittings and 12 inch watermain, valves and fittings for all 12 inch watermain.
20. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the
construction of streets and utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City
Engineer,and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for public streets,sanitary
sewer, water and storm sewer. Plans for public infrastructures shall be of a plan view and
profile on 24 x 36 plan sheets consistent with City standards. Prior to release of the final plat
for the Property,Developer shall furnish to the City Engineer and receive the City Engineer's
written approval of a surety equal to 125%of the cost of said improvements. A permit fee of
five percent of construction value shall be paid to City by Developer. The design engineer
shall provide daily inspection, certify completion in conformance to approved plans and
specifications and provide record drawings.
21. TREE LOSS-TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 15,491 diameter inches of significant
trees on the Property. Tree loss related to development on the Property is calculated at 5,197
diameter inches. Tree replacement required is 2,350 caliper inches. Prior to the issuance of
any grading permit for the Property,Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive
the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 2,350 caliper inches.
This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3-inch diameter minimum size for a
shade tree and a 7-foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also
provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide
tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss.
Prior to issuance of any grading permit for the Property,Developer shall furnish to the City
Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a tree replacement bond equal to 150%of
the cost of said improvements as required by City Code.
Developer shall complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan prior to
occupancy permit issuance.
22. WETLAND/ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN: Prior to release of the Land Alteration
Permit for any portion of the Property, Developer shall submit to the Environmental
Coordinator and receive the Environmental Coordinator's approval of a Wetland Plan.
The approved Wetland Plan shall be consistent with the materials and requirements
shown on the Plans and as required by City Code. The Plan shall include the following
elements.
A. Wetland Buffer Strip Vegetation Evaluation: Developer shall submit to the City a
Wetland Buffer Strip Evaluation Report ("Buffer Report") in accordance with the
Wetland Plan and City Code requirements. If the Buffer Report identifies any
unacceptable vegetation or other conditions, the wetland(s) and/or wetland buffer
strip(s) shall be graded, treated, reseeded and/or replanted (thereon known as
"Landscaping",or"Landscaped")by the Developer within 90 days of submission of
the Buffer Report. If the Wetland Plan is submitted after September 15th, the
Landscaping must be completed by June 30th of the following year. If Landscaping
of the wetland(s)or wetland buffer strip(s)is required,the Developer shall submit a
signed statement by a qualified wetland consultant, as determined by the City
Manager,stating that the wetland(s)and wetland buffer strip(s)comply with all City
requirements within 30 days of completion of the Landscaping of the wetland(s)and
wetland buffer strip(s).
B. Annual Wetland and Wetland Buffer Strip Evaluation: Developer shall submit a
signed contract with a qualified wetland consultant, as determined by the City
Manager and/or designee,for preparation of an Annual Wetland and Wetland Buffer
Strip Evaluation Report(Annual Buffer Report) that evaluates the condition of the
wetland(s)and wetland buffer strip(s)to determine if they are in compliance with all
City and State requirements. The Annual Buffer Report shall provide both an action
plan and proposed cost for correction of all problems identified within the wetland(s)
and/or wetland buffer strip(s).
The first Annual Buffer Report shall be submitted no later than November 1 of the
calendar year in which construction of the wetland and/or wetland buffer strip is
commenced. Thereafter, this report shall be submitted annually until two full
growing seasons following completion of the development have passed, at which
point a final Annual Report shall be submitted. The final Annual Buffer Report shall
evaluate the wetland(s) and wetland buffer strip(s) to determine if the wetland(s)
and/or wetland buffer strip(s) remain in compliance with all City and State
requirements.
If any unacceptable conditions or vegetation are identified within the Annual Buffer
Reports or final Annual Buffer Report, the Developer shall correct the area(s)
identified within 90 days of submission of the Annual Buffer Report.
C. Endangered Species:As part of the Annual Buffer Report,Developer shall evaluate
the Property to determine the presence and location of and evaluate the condition of
any endangered,threatened or special concern species to determine that the Property
complies with all City and State requirements. If any requirements are not met,
Developer shall correct the violation within 90 days of the submission for the Annual
Buffer Report.
D. Wetland Buffer Strip Monuments: Developer shall submit a plan sheet showing
the proposed locations for the wetland buffer strip monuments for review and written
approval by the Environmental Coordinator. Prior to release of the first building
permit for any portion of the Property,Developer shall install all wetland buffer strip
monuments for the property. The Security referred to in paragraph F below shall
include the cost for location,including surveying,and installation of the monuments.
Wetland buffer strip monument locations shall be shown on the final grading plan
and final plat. The post shall be a 1.12 to 2.0 pounds per foot(1.12 pounds per foot
is preferred)green steel channel post or other material pre-approved in writing by the
City Manager or his designee. The post shall be a minimum of 2.25 inches wide and
6 feet 6 inches long(2.25"x 6.5').The sign shall have a minimum size of 3 inch by 8
inch (3" x 8"). The sign shall be mounted flush with the top of the post and shall
include the statement"City Property Boundary,City of Eden Prairie". The post shall
be mounted to a height of four feet above grade and set at least 2.5 feet in the ground.
Removal of the wetland buffer strip monuments is prohibited. Removal of the
wetland buffer strip monuments is prohibited.
E. Wetland Plan Security: Developer shall furnish to the Environmental Coordinator
and receive the Environmental Coordinator's approval of a Wetland Plan
performance bond,cash escrow,or letter of credit with a corporation approved by the
City Manager or other guarantee acceptable to the City Manager(hereinafter referred
to as the"Security")equal to 150%of the cost,as estimated by the City Manager,of
completing said Wetland Plan requirements and/or Landscaping as depicted on the
Plans and as required by City Code. Said Security shall cover costs associated with
the Wetland Plan during development and for two full growing seasons following
completion of the development.
If the Developer fails to implement the Wetland Plan in accordance with its terms,
the City may draw upon the Security in whole or in part to pay the cost of
implementation.
23. MODEL HOMES:Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary,
the City will issue a building permit for one (1) model home and a temporary parking lot
upon Developer's compliance with the following requirements:
• Approval of building plan by chief building inspector;
• Approval of survey for model home and parking lot by ,
• Presence of a paved road within 300 feet of the model home and presence on said paved
road of a fire hydrant within 1000 feet of the model home; and
• Approval by Fire Chief.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be
executed as of the day and year aforesaid.
DEVELOPER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By By
Its Nancy Tyra-Lukens
Its Mayor
By By
Its Rick Getschow
Its City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2012,
by Nancy Tyra-Lukens and Rick Getschow,respectively the Mayor and the City Manager of the City
of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2012,by
,the , of Toll MN,L.P., on behalf of the limited partnership.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie,MN 55344
EXHIBIT A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - HENNEPIN VILLAGE SITE B TOLL
2012
Legal Description Before Final Plat
Outlot A and Lot 3, Block 1, Spring Heights, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29,Township 116,Range 22,
Hennepin County Minnesota, lying northwesterly of the centerline of Hennepin County State Aid
Highway No 4. Excepting therefrom the following described tract: Commencing at the northeast
corner of said Northeast of the Southeast Quarter,thence on a assumed bearing of South, along the
east line thereof,a distance of 522.70 to the actual point of beginning:thence continue South,along
said east line, a distance of 383.94 feet; thence North15 degrees 46 minutes 19 seconds West, a
distance of 358.33 feet; thence Northeasterly of the point of beginning.
Tracts A&B, Registered Land Survey No. 465,Files of the Registrar of Titles,Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 29,Township 116,Range 22,
lying easterly of the centerline of Village Road(now Eden Prairie Road),northerly of the Registered
Land Survey No 465,and southerly of line described as commencing at the southeast corner of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter,a distance of 681.13 feet to the point of beginning of the
line to be described ; thence westerly, deflecting to the left 87 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds, a
distance of 1316.94 feet, more or less, to the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter and there terminating.
That part of the South 225 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 29,
Township 116, Range 22, lying westerly of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 465.
The South 225 feet of the East 350 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast of Section 29,
Township 116, Range 22.
Legal Description After Final Plat
EXHIBIT B
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - HENNEPIN VILLAGE SITE B TOLL
2012
EXHIBIT C
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - HENNEPIN VILLAGE SITE B TOLL 2012
I. Prior to release of any building permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer for
approval two copies of a development plan(1"=100'scale)showing existing and proposed
contours,proposed streets,and lot arrangements and size,minimum floor elevations on each
lot,preliminary alignment and grades for sanitary sewer,water main,and storm sewer, 100-
year flood plain contours, ponding areas, tributary areas to catch basins, arrows showing
direction of storm water flow on all lots,location of walks,trails,and any property deeded to
the City.
II. Developer shall submit detailed construction and storm sewer plans to the Watershed District
for review and approval. Developer shall follow all rules and recommendations of said
Watershed District.
III. Developer shall pay cash park fees as to all of the Property required by City Code in effect as
of the date of the issuance of each building permit for construction on the Property.
IV. If Developer fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement within twenty-four (24)
months of the date hereof,Developer,for itself,its successors,and assigns,shall not oppose
the City's reconsideration and rescission of any Rezoning, Site Plan review and/or Guide
Plan review approved in connection with this Agreement, thus restoring the status of the
Property before the Development Agreement and all approvals listed above were approved.
V. Provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the Property and
the Owners, their successors and assigns of the Property.
VI. The Developer hereby irrevocably nominates, constitutes, and appoints and designates the
City as its attorney-in-fact for the sole purpose and right to amend Exhibit A hereto to
identify the legal description of the Property after platting thereof.
VII. Developer represents that it has marketable fee title to the Property, except:
INSERT ANY NAME/COMPANY LISTED IN ANY OWNER'S SUPPLEMENT
TO THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT)
With respect to any interest in all portions of the Property which Developer is required,
pursuant to this Agreement, to dedicate or convey to the City (the "Dedicated Property"),
Developer represents and warrants as follows now and at the time of dedication or
conveyance:
A. That Developer has marketable fee title free and clear of all mortgages, liens, and
other encumbrances. Prior to final plat approval,Developer shall provide to the City
a current title insurance policy insuring such a condition of title.
B. That Developer has not used, employed, deposited, stored, disposed of, placed or
otherwise allowed to come in or on the Dedicated Property,any hazardous substance,
hazardous waste, pollutant, or contaminant, including, but not limited to, those
defined in or pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 9601,et. seq.,or Minn. Stat., Sec. 115B.01,et.
seq. (such substances, wastes, pollutants, and contaminants hereafter referred to as
"Hazardous Substances");
C. That Developer has not allowed any other person to use, employ, deposit, store,
dispose of,place or otherwise have,in or on the Property,any Hazardous Substances.
D. That,to the Developer's actual knowledge,no previous owner,operator or possessor
of the Property deposited, stored, disposed of,placed or otherwise allowed in or on
the Property any hazardous substances.
Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its successors and assigns,
against any and all loss,costs,damage and expense,including reasonable attorneys fees and
costs that the City incurs because of the breach of any of the above representations or
warranties and/or resulting from or due to the release or threatened release of Hazardous
Substances which were, or are claimed or alleged to have been,used, employed, deposited,
stored, disposed of, placed, or otherwise located or allowed to be located, in or on the
Dedicated Property by Developer, its employees, agents, contractors or representatives.
VIII. Developer acknowledges that Developer is familiar with the requirements of Chapter 11,
Zoning,and Chapter 12, Subdivision Regulations,of the City Code and other applicable City
ordinances affecting the development of the Property. Developer agrees to develop the
Property in accordance with the requirements of all applicable City Code requirements and
City Ordinances.
IX. Prior to release of the final plat,Developer shall pay to City fees for the first three(3)years'
street lighting on the public streets adjacent to the Property(including installation costs, if
any, as determined by electrical power provider), engineering review, and street signs.
X. Developer shall submit detailed water main, fire protection, and emergency vehicle access
plans to the Fire Marshal for review and approval. Developer shall follow all the
recommendations of the Fire Marshal.
XI. Developer acknowledges that the rights of City performance of obligations of Developer
contemplated in this agreement are special, unique, and of an extraordinary character, and
that, in the event that Developer violates, or fails, or refuses to perform any covenant,
condition, or provision made herein, City may be without an adequate remedy at law.
Developer agrees,therefore,that in the event Developer violates,fails,or refuses to perform
any covenant, condition, or provision made herein, City may, at its option, institute and
prosecute an action to specifically enforce such covenant, withhold building permits or
rescind or revoke any approvals granted by the City. No remedy conferred in this agreement
is intended to be exclusive and each shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every
other remedy. The election of any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of any
other remedy.
XII. Developer shall,prior to the commencement of any improvements,provide written notice to
Comcast of the development contemplated by this Development Agreement. Notice shall be
sent to Comcast Cable, 9705 Data Park, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343.
XIII. Prior to building permit issuance,all fees associated with the building permit shall be paid to
the Inspections Department,including;Building permit fee,plan check fee,State surcharge,
metro system access charge(SAC),City SAC and City water access charge(WAC),and park
dedication. Contact Metropolitan Waste Control to determine the number of SAC units.
XIV. Prior to building permit issuance, except as otherwise authorized in the approved Plans,
existing structures, wells and septic systems (if present) shall be properly abandoned or
removed as required by City ordinance and all permits obtained through the Inspections
Department.
XV. Prior to building permit issuance,Developer shall provide two copies of an approved survey
or site plan (1" = 200 scale) showing proposed building location and all proposed streets,
with approved street names, lot arrangements and property lines.
XVI. The City shall not issue any building permit for the construction of any building,structure,or
improvement on the Property until all requirements listed in this Exhibit C have been
satisfactorily addressed by Developer.
XVII. No failure of the City to comply with any term,condition,covenant or agreement herein shall
subject the City to liability for any claim for damages, costs or other financial or pecuniary
charges. No execution on any claim, demand, cause of action or judgment shall be levied
upon or collected from the general credit, general fund or taxing powers of the City.
XVIII. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for the Property, Developer shall permanently
demarcate the location of the boundary of Outlots A and B on each lot property line or corner
with registered land survey pins.
XIX. Within 10 days of the approval of the Development Agreement, the Developer shall record
the Development Agreement at the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Titles. The final
plat shall not be released until proof of filing of the Development Agreement is submitted to
the City.
XX. The City is hereby granted the option, but not the obligation, to complete or cause
completion in whole or part of all of the Developer's obligations under this Agreement for
which a bond, letter of credit, cash deposit or other security (hereinafter referred to as the
"Security")is required if the Developer defaults with respect to any term or condition in this
Agreement for which Security is required and fails to cure such default(s) within ten (10)
days after receipt of written notice thereof from the City;provided however if the nature of
the cure is such that it is not possible to complete the cure within ten(10) days, it shall be
sufficient if the Developer has initiated and is diligently pursuing such cure. The Developer
acknowledges that the City does not assume any obligations or duties of the Developer with
respect to any such contract agreements unless the City shall agree in writing to do so.
The City may draw down on or make a claim against the Security,as appropriate,upon five
(5)business days notice to the Developer,for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or
if the Security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the obligations for
which Security is required are not completed at least thirty(30)days prior to the expiration of
the Security and if the Security has not then been renewed,replaced or otherwise extended
beyond the expiration date, the City may also draw down or make a claim against the
Security as appropriate. If the Security is drawn down on or a claim is made against the
Security, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default(s) and to reimburse the City for all
costs and expenses, including attorneys' fee, incurred by the City in enforcing this
Agreement.
XXI. The Developer hereby grants the City, it's agents, employees, officers and contractors a
license to enter the Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the
City in conjunction with this Agreement.
XXII. This Agreement is a contract agreement between the City and the Developer. No provision
of this Agreement inures to the benefit of any third person,including the public at large,so as
to constitute any such person as a third-party beneficiary of the Agreement or of any one or
more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action for any person not a
party hereto.
EXHIBIT D
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - HENNEPIN VILLAGE SITE B TOLL
2012
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
Developer shall cause the following notice to be given, either from Developer itself or Developer's
successors in interest to any portion of the Property,to all residential home purchasers of lots within
the Property who intend to occupy a residence on such lot, prior to the execution of a purchase
agreement or agreement to construct a residence on a lot within the Property,whichever occurs first:
The Property is located near Flying Cloud Airport, a public use airport owned and operated by
the Metropolitan Airports Commission. The Airport is available 24 hrs a day, year round.
The Airport operates two parallel east/west runways,and a north/south crosswind runway,all of
which are lighted. An FAA control tower manages air traffic near the airport from 7:00 am—
10:00 pm.
The Airport accommodates aircraft operations from single and multi-engine propeller aircraft;
corporate jet aircraft; helicopters; and pilot training facilities; which may affect the Property.
Further information regarding the airport can be obtained from the Office of the Airside Project
Manager, Telephone No.: 612-725-8371.
The following statement is taken from the Metropolitan Airports Commission letter to the
City dated February 24, 2012:
"The Hennepin Village— Site B development is located in an area the receives regular overflights
from Flying Cloud Airport(FCM). The flight tracks in the vicinity of the proposed development
have been previously reviewed by the City and evaluated as part of an Environmental
Assessment process. Although this development is beyond the federally defined noise area, the
proposed development will receive overflights from FCM and residents should expect to see and
hear aircraft. Since this is a potential new development, there should be no expectations now, or
in the future, that the MAC will provide noise mitigation for this new residential development
area.
Given the proximity of this development to the airport and the regular overflights that occur in
the area, MAC has concerns with the development on the site. However, if it is determined that
the development will move forward, it is important that the residents are aware of their new
homes proximity to the airport and the existence of regular overflights prior to purchase.
Additionally, adherence to the Metropolitans Councils Building Performance Standards for
Aircraft Noise should be a requirement of building construction."
EXHIBIT E
EXISTING PROSPECT ROAD SITE LINE IMPROVEMENTS
I
I •
' \, .. . \ D\ n g .... 2g oyy
-' m N
�$y�w % \ fi .. CO �o
Nut ,r,. gp
rnG
rr tHi
a ill i •* _ 1:1r.., .
AriT w •
.. A .....
u _, .j
F "i
i
i•
F §
APF .111.-_. --i
x
F m 0 ti _ � . -—0 p v�N
1-
,-, _ 1 A a y R
cmo ., `n
Ato �J. _r '1 h m N o
.3
;11;
s�a
1f r k i -i
g A n
7 Y 1 F
EXHIBIT F
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - HENNEPIN VILLAGE SITE B TOLL
2012
AGREEMENT REGARDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT MADE THIS day of , 2012,between the
City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, (the "City") and , a Minnesota
(the "Owner").
A. The Owner holds legal and equitable title to property described as_
,Hennepin County,Minnesota,which property is the
subject of this Agreement and is hereinafter referred to as the "Property".
B. The Owner desires to develop the property in such a manner that relies upon and
requires the construction of the following public improvements:
(1) The City's trunk utility system, including trunk sanitary sewers,trunk
watermains,wells, elevated storage facilities and a water treatment plant(all of which is
hereafter referred to as the "Trunk Improvements").
(2) Street and utility improvements adjacent to the Property(which is hereafter
referred to as "Eden Prairie Road Improvements").
C. The parties hereto desire to enter into an Agreement concerning the financing of the
construction of the Trunk Improvements and the Eden Prairie Road Improvements all of which will
inure to the benefit of the Property.
AGREEMENTS
IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:
1. The Owner consents to the levying of assessments against the Property for the
construction, and maintenance of the Trunk Improvements and Eden Prairie Road Improvements as
follows:
a). The Property will be assessed for Trunk Improvements on 28.65 acres in an amount
not to exceed$181,978.25.
b). The Property will be assessed for Eden Prairie Road Improvements in an amount
not to exceed$1,144,000 in accordance with the Feasibility Study pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429.
2. The City will prepare a Feasibility Report that shows proposed costs to be assessed
against the Property and additional amounts to be assessed against other lands for the Eden Prairie
Road Improvements. The actual cost to be assessed against the Property for the Eden Prairie Road
Improvements may differ from the amount in the Feasibility Report. Actual cost to be assessed
against the Property for the Eden Prairie Road Improvements shall be determined in the same
manner as reported in the Feasibility Report prepared with respect to these improvements.
3. For purposes of determining the amount of the assessments,the costs of the Eden Prairie
Road Improvements shall include, in addition to actual construction costs, administrative, interest
and engineering costs and fees incurred or paid by the City in relationship to construction of the
Eden Prairie Road Improvements and costs incurred for acquisition of easements and or right-of-
way including attorney fees.
4. The City's assessment records for the Property will show the assessments as a
"pending assessment"until levied.
5. The Owner waives notice of any assessment hearing to be held at which hearing or
hearings the assessment is to be considered by the City Council and thereafter approved and levied.
6. The Owner concurs that the benefit to the Property by virtue of the Improvements to
be constructed exceeds the amount of the assessment to be levied against the Property. The Owner
waives all rights it has by virtue of Minnesota Statute 429.081 or otherwise to challenge the amount
or validity of the assessments, or the procedures used by the City in apportioning the assessments
and hereby releases the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all liability related to
or arising out of the imposition or levying of the assessments.
7. This agreement shall be effective immediately.
8. This Agreement may not be terminated or amended except in writing executed by
both parties hereto,provided however upon the levying of the special assessments contemplated by
Paragraph 1 hereof the City may upon request of the owner of the property affected,without the
necessity of further City Council approval,unilaterally prepare and provide to the owner for
recording a document releasing any property so levied from this Agreement.
9. This Agreement constitutes a lien upon the Property in the amount of$1,325,978.20
until such time as the assessments referred to above are levied.If the assessments are not levied within
5 years from date of this agreement,Developer may request that the city council,in its sole and absolute
discretion,release the lien of this paragraph,provided however the remainder of this Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect. Upon the recording of the final plat for the Property as provided in the
Development Agreement between the parties dated May 15,2012,the lien shall be deemed to be pro-
rata against each residential lot($1,325,978.20 divided by 52 lots equals $25,499.58 per lot).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to
be executed as of the day and year aforesaid.
OWNERS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By By
Its Nancy Tyra-Lukens
Its Mayor
By By
Its Rick Getschow,
Its City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2012, by Nancy Tyra-Lukens and Rick Getschow, respectively the Mayor
and the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of
said corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2012, by , the of
, a Minnesota , on behalf of the
corporation.
Notary Public
OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into as of ,2012,by and between
Hennepin Village Limited partnership, a Minnesota corporation, ("Owner"), and the CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE ("City"):
For,and in consideration of,and to induce City to adopt Resolution No. for Planned Unit
Development Concept Review,Ordinance No. for Planned Unit Development District Review
and Zoning District Change from Rural to R 1-13.5,and Resolution No. for Preliminary Plat,as
more fully described in that certain Development Agreement entered into as of ,2012,by and
between ,a Minnesota ,and City("Development
Agreement")pertaining to that certain Property described on Exhibit A hereto, Owner agrees with City as
follows:
1 If , fails to commence development in accordance with
the Development Agreement and fails to obtain an occupancy permit for all of the
improvements referred to in the Development Agreement within 24 months of the
date of this Owners' Supplement, Owner shall not oppose the City's
reconsideration and rescission of Resolution No. for Planned Unit
Development Concept Review, Ordinance No. for Planned Unit
Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5,
and Resolution No. for Preliminary Plat, identified above, thus
restoring the status of the Property before the Development Agreement and all
approvals listed above were approved.
2. This Agreement and the Development Agreement shall be binding upon and
enforceable against the Property and the Owner, their successors and assigns of
the Property.
3. If Owner transfers this Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the
transferee requiring that such transferee agree to all of the terms, conditions and
obligations of"Developer" in the Development Agreement. Neither the Owner or
transferee are required to develop the property in accordance with this Agreement,
so long as Owner or transferee obtain such approvals as are required by City Code
to develop the Property in a manner other than as set forth in this Agreement.
(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to
be executed as of the day and year aforesaid.
OWNERS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By By
Its Nancy Tyra-Lukens
Its Mayor
By By
Its Rick Getschow,
Its City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2012, by Nancy Tyra-Lukens and Rick Getschow, respectively the Mayor
and the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of
said corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2012, by , the of
, a Minnesota , on behalf of the
corporation.
Notary Public
EXHIBIT A - OWNERS SUPPLEMENT
Legal Description Before Final Plat
Outlot A and Lot 3, Block 1, Spring Heights, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29,Township 116,Range 22,
Hennepin County Minnesota, lying northwesterly of the centerline of Hennepin County State Aid
Highway No 4. Excepting therefrom the following described tract: Commencing at the northeast
corner of said Northeast of the Southeast Quarter,thence on a assumed bearing of South, along the
east line thereof,a distance of 522.70 to the actual point of beginning:thence continue South,along
said east line, a distance of 383.94 feet; thence North15 degrees 46 minutes 19 seconds West, a
distance of 358.33 feet; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning.
Tracts A&B, Registered Land Survey No. 465,Files of the Registrar of Titles,Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 29,Township 116,Range 22,
lying easterly of the centerline of Village Road(now Eden Prairie Road),northerly of the Registered
Land Survey No 465,and southerly of line described as commencing at the southeast corner of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter,a distance of 681.13 feet to the point of beginning of the
line to be described ; thence westerly, deflecting to the left 87 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds, a
distance of 1316.94 feet, more or less, to the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter and there terminating.
That part of the South 225 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 29,
Township 116, Range 22, lying westerly of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 465.
The South 225 feet of the East 350 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast of Section 29,
Township 116, Range 22.
Legal Description After Final Plat
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Calendar May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: VIII.D.
Randy L. Slick Final Plat Report of Eden Prairie Woods
Public Works /Engineering
Requested Action
Move to: Adopt the Resolution approving the final plat of Eden Prairie Woods.
Synopsis
This proposal is for the plat located south of Flying Cloud Airport, east of Eden Prairie Road and
north of CSAH#61. The plat consists of 71.5 acres to be platted into 53 single family lots, 4 outlots
and right of way dedication for street purposes.
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on March 20, 2012. Second reading of the
Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement will be completed on May
15, 2012.
Approval of the final plat is subject to the following conditions:
• Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$3,445.00.
• Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$13,899.00.
• Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of$3,626.00.
• The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement.
• Prior to the release of the final plat, Developer shall execute the Special Assessment Agreement
for trunk utility improvements in the amount of$181,978.25 and for Eden Prairie Road
improvements in the amount of$1,144,000.00.
• Prior to release of the final plat, Developer shall provide a warranty deed to the City for Outlots
A and B.
• Prior to release of the final plat, Developer shall record and provide proof of filing the
Development Agreement at the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Titles.
• Prior to release of the final plat, Developer shall provide to the City a current title insurance
policy.
• Satisfaction of bonding requirements for the installation of public improvements.
• Revisions to plat shall include street name changes to Parkview Terrace, Woodland Cove and
Highview Court.
• Revisions to plat shall include a 20 foot strip of drainage and utility easement over proposed
storm sewer on Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 1.
• Revisions to plat shall include proposed retaining walls excluded from the drainage and utility
easement on Lots 11 through 14, 18 through 20 and 24, Block 1.
Attachments
• Resolution
• Drawing of final plat
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDEN PRAIRIE WOODS
WHEREAS, the plat of Eden Prairie Woods has been submitted in a manner required for platting
land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and
all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
A. Plat approval request for Eden Prairie Woods is approved upon compliance with the
recommendation of the Final Plat Report on this plat dated May 15,2012.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this resolution to the
owners of the subdivision of the above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of
approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 15, 2012.
Nancy Tyra-Lukens,Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk
DRAFT
EDEN PRAIRIE WOODS C.R.DOC.NO.
R.T.DOC.NO.
PRESENTS:That Toll MN,Limited Partnership,a Minnesota limited partnership,Me owner,of EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
tthe following described property situated in the County of Hennepin,State of Mimes.,to wit
This PAY of EDEN PRAIRIE WOODS was approved and accepted by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota,at a
Parcel 1, regular meeting thereof hem this_day of 20_If applicable the written comments and
OmAt A and La 3.Block 1.SPRING HEIGHTS,according to the recorded plat thereof,Hennepin County,Minnesota. recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by
Abstract and Torten Land the City or the prescribed 30day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations,as
provided by Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03,Subdivision 2.
Parcel 2,
Mat artathe Northeast Quarter of Me Southeast Quarter ofSection z9,Township 116,Range',Hennepin County,
Minnesota,lying Northwesterly of the centerline of Hennepin County State Aid Highway No.A.Excepting therefrom the City Council,Eden Prairie,Minnesota
following ast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter;thence on
assumed bear gtlof South,aa gthegFast line thereof,adistance of 522.70 feet to Me actual point of beginning:thence
continue South,along said EMI line,a distance of 383.94 Aeti thence distance of 25833 feet,thence Northeasterly Lot.pomto beginning.North IS degrees,.minutes,l9 seconds wen,a y Mayor y City Manager
Abrtract Land.
Parcel A TAXPAYERS SERVICES DEPARTMENT,Hennepin County,Minnesota
Tracts A and B,Registered Land Survey No.e6S,Files of Me Registrar of Titles,He pCounty,Minnesota.
Torten Land !hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_antl prior years have been paid for land described on this plat,dated this
day of
Parcel a,
That part of Me Southeast Quarter oft he Northeastetuarter ofSection 29,Township 116,Range 22,Iying Easterly of the Mark Chapin,County Auditor
r Road(now Men Prairie Road).Northerly of Registered Land Survey No.665.and Southerly of line
centerline
as ommendng at Southeast comer a said Southeast quarter oft he Northeast Quarter;thence North,along the
fast line of sart Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter,a distance of 681.13 feet to Me point of beginning e line obe By: ,Deputy
descrart thence Weshdy,deflervng to Me left BE
s, seconds,a distance
less,the Wert line of said southeast Quarter of Me Northheast Quarter and there terminating.
1316.96hm,more or
ating,
Tonenz tans SURVEY DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota
Has used the same to be surveyed and platted as EDEN PRAIRIE WOODS,and does hereby donate and dedicate to
the public for public use forever the public ways,and does also dedicate the easements as shown on this plat Mr Pursuant to MinnesotaStatutes Section 383B.565(1969),this plat has been approved this day of
drainage and utility purposes only. 0
William P.Brown,County Surveyor
In witness whereof said Toll MN,Limited Partnership,has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this
day of
Toll MN,LIMITED PARTNERSHIP REGISTRAR OF TOMES,Hennepin County,Minnesota
SIGNED:
Alex Martin,Vice President Ihereby certify that the within plat of EDEN PRAIRIE WOODS was filed in this office this day of
_o'clock_ .
y ,as Martin McCormick,Acting Reglttar of Titles
STATE OF MINNESOTA By: ,Deputy
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_,by
Alex Martin,as Vice President of Toll Brothers.Inc,on behalf of the corporation. COUNTY RECORDER,Hennepin County,Minnesota
I hereby certify that the within plat of EDEN PRAIRIE WOODS was recorded in this office this day of
20_,at_o'clock_.M.
Notary Public, County,Minnesota Notary Printed Name
My Commission Expires Martin McCormick,Acting County Recorder
I Marcus F.Hampton do hereby certify that this plat was prepared bVme or under MY directsupervisAn,Matlama By: ,Deputy
duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota;that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary
survey;that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat;that all monuments depicted on
this plat have been,or will be correctly set within one year;that all water boundaries and wet lands,as defined In
Minnesota Statutes, Subd.3,as of the date of this certlfirate are shown and labeled on this Plat;and
all public Section ways are shown and labeled on this plat.
Dated this day of ,20
Marcus F.Hampton,Licensed Land Surveyor,
Minnesota License No.67081
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Eby Marcus
F.Hampton,a Licensed Land Surveyor.
Notary Public, County,Minnesota Notary Printed Name
My Commission Expires
MFRA,INC.
ENGINEERING,PLANNING
AND LAND SURVEYING
SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS
DRAFT
EDEN PRAIRIE WOODS C.R.DOC.NO.
R.T.DOC.NO.
CORNER.SEC.RR.
TAP.Ile.
Oa Exx Ca 0111
I __ __ dux-L --
� w
,
II •� •' N87.28'02•W 1248.77 gs'" -
ri
in i
'rrg N d / F� 04,E . /
le to // r \i w \
\ \ \
I( ram( I g b w
IQ I &g ne1•aT'ss;170.30 'ree8i, \ \ \\
1? I I' J s --I r- \ N ,
Ig = ne5%� - g1111 I'14 .' ,'.� \\\ � K /
�. Q :=a .B o o i I 3 I I' / ,' \ \ / 13N°G
W ill i �I . 11 I I Io-n�z'ss• i q9 \ ,.•
OU7LOT A \ / jgt
'W f I-.I`� 2 81 I F ��t�l 11NL><ee.fio :e2 \ \\ / N66 S ..
,'I �+ 1 1 Lr 6N 1 \ 4 B6,wnaE•MT'MOW \ 2
\ Z '` r,\ '*, 2 SI IS� a`Ae.s6j• \ mm NA aF pmOTA \ / zq6
Vt-
OI..u"°txal w` •_ t o•1n J 5:--�'- L,• <�a 5 \ . \\ / 39
1 _ W 1` T \ J\�V/- 2.26• ei \�' \ \a\/�T`/ Gfih
I-�bmT°ae�`7% `� Y` 586.5Y20•W $'' 8Z I` g II' �yy )\ z
c_ IIgggg8 oya;a. &'BO,�''VIEW COURT 8,•4 3�P•L-n]6•5: I $R / eP8 '
s•gll. y � ' �'� . a gas �- !•b r�� 1 s 4�p0 •
1 �� '.:•1.�' naF q & ''a�'� \ram is��� ; d� ��
I' H= ' `E, ---b m•'gAi/F�°.- •J2 3r20 4 e \va / 8'•' \
z •� e'b'E ter,• /J¢4,: ' \\•- 6 / bd' +�,h8 __)- aTEs[/xlrva ev lamwlRon MorvuMENT
'1/ , ,2..,�Ne.Jt ',<„a� [ d �k \\S• / ,}. 'PIP:" - oeN
R�280.00 • \ / @V4t $ETAND MARNED av LICENSE rv0.a2a81.
awNelr ),/fil •Nnr57.;w'n h 4.,:::,' 'z• \'>\\L=sass \1\i - 1P ' \ �' • • DENOTES 1/21NCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND
L=].M ' _•�'f= ^ �za.iF .p [yegD T'(t\'5--'\" N ' •,,,, d, I '� REGISTRATION NO.n2s UNLESS
G=7.M •4F •'` ,]'42' [• O BJ �4 Its 3A L 18T. t0'' IP'44S i \ OTHERWISE SHOWN.
GfiF9.�518.80'4YW N '.......
--18.01 b•W d./3*3- ,` °7�q'§,�93Y0•\ :-_r� ‹, r'4�, 6 N�.E N A ,g 4
a / A/$g 518y1'391Y ,,1•R�\ ,43}��' • 2pR036' !✓Y�24 N6 • 4 \ \ \ STHE EC.EASTLIN]O NE 1/00F THE SE U40F
;= I / _/ 1:4 OUTLOT C o ,t.�• 1 I i °' 1r R"•z2q�'»tt[']an y see°4s•E8E zoau R+a:�° �jo pe • €,x $ A BEARING OF NORTH OU DEGREES 23 MINUTES 9
'fi(� g/�k�`T ,[swum a i ,p. tOe•,4,;',,�'-k`z7t[y a�cr,�. N ti 2. NG6,0�7 E I I seconds WEST.
111 .g /,`- L.6.31 ,+f� I I a[e . •[.ttz39+- PROSPECT ROAD 24• • TN N DRAINAGE AND UTILItt EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:
', =1 I e. fiZl J 86• ffi h^27'06
• Y s� �.'�9'1]35• I 1 kJ7.l r-_:- - SBB'4s'rs 200.14 EN 129.79 g'/4• (NOT TO SCALE)
. � ses Jzza
4 / / 6ja _ Ln N LIE NE I"COsE EA so.RR / 141/6 ffC m--.
O•�u'A`t°��-- .. • -- I 1--- -Tel.. }L-_-_..t---� ` R.3 _ ' __ __ _- -- sJl�
I 1. EE----;,; m 42 S9 I„ 1 -.y / `=i.a81 .uaet,zsze2 -L---- ----- 1
nlp� a ', s o, gl I 7 -,D //fi o-l•46ve" J��r
am$ 6a:'ut vasEav II I•;: Fvt I- 6 I 1 s,/ 1 /(3` ,'' � l�� .xEl/A__,= } A
H-� 589.32'3"E_,5..� ( PA
L4.` �/ /T 8 //•- , ,� sE�/A eECA �f s
zz u I `n - 1I b•i'?•:/ ^I toll \\ _ ' __J L____[.
€. --� vp' '�1}'I Ia'6B•/rlr,�/ / ' . 4 ' OUTLOT B \ 1
.g€ o rL^ 1 a �°n,J L?a x�/ /r 5 . ./ 1=a,,7z . W t }
Q� 3-1 1 4,�• ,, .Io\!jb- • .'/ '%� y �� I S N BEING S FEET IN WIDTH, OTHERWISE
I sa ja • `'�O yf,,.•�;� r3._o-z a•// . cc , •
OM Pa Oramor• \\� ; Y INDICATED,ANDDJOINiGLOT LINES,END
b 5 r3 -y //�a , �a ,. 'tIIN WIDTH,
I_ �1t76.OS i%� AS �t r QTO, , ,�, I INDICATED,AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAV
w•1 t G°d0` -J 4 [. r6•i ••�' I 4 w 3 LINE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT
�, 2 b�'K FI eI 6.21b1.29• woo 51 as 24 t)= ..67.81- -/ gl = ,
r �� I 34'L 28.87:�` `N ryA4.s8 z?r�• o us �a0• q 10 j $ ` �_l //I a: n.s4EAsr L f1 L'--__ 'II° PARKVIEW TF ?°� \,-5 Is \ I \ I �II
I 1 z gj'' L=ta89s` o- EAsr/1sx.•e• -• 9'Q9g \Si I i/ \ll
w gig 4 lit (F1,„, -� _`-L�54.96 L=s4.98.____� Y L \L�. Il,eosx-
6I- L=85,01.c_II1� '- R0300'0 R=120.0 _ LIST ussiz '
m a0T1'30•I R�85.00 I_'-saoo{' M90Yi0'00",�90TMI'00" -saro h•-INB]R6'2b•E 146.15
1 ` '4 T NORTH
iraTa
' 7I L=zao4,I o-zzYass• _ D 1 z
i .-a4.n J•S
fafls�( I EAST 184.29 - I/ SCALE IN FEET
14 ---MATCHLINE A- I = �MATCHLINE A-- MPRA,INC.__ _ ENGINEERING,PLANNING
-1 ---- AND LAND SURVEYING
SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS
DRAFT
EDEN PRAIRIE WOODS C.R.DOC.NO.
MATCHLINE A-E;,,- 'A EAST 134.00 ---------MATCHLINE A - R.T.Doc.No.
89.1] 44.83b _
I , / '.L=54.98 I� L-54.98 N8778'28•E�148.15 -. - '-,� Las,'usu31 _
xA r
R=35.00 1 R-35D0�.--� - - It."e. / \
11
3].80.� T 1 t90`00'00• 0 b909T0'o0' „„,, 1 1� n
-osi jQ! EAST L +84.29 - F� I$ 4 ,°_ I - ' I I H
\I/ W fT 1j it
3 ml 111 q / 51
I \ ;
g 8 B I le L J+ 0 l6 I NEST 13 . / \
I I�gz V EAST 12].18 x-_ $ k- 118.00 �j //I
li a 3 Ly €
el
O r EAST 180.91 1ILE'31�' 8 K 8 12 i1' 8
_ evn
I 0j!2 2 18 3€ '0200 4- 10�00 -fin II( R 5 g
�,5b 1 Im q� I`�-r---1 rEASi T-, - 3 _ P,-. \
1
tp L J - ^: r xEsr 14e.oD °'' ,: I.
o o a 3 = �" « \ �1
Ie EAST 1s&9z a g a 13 g a 1
18 1is 1 € 2 A-
_ )
HEST 148.00 1
- -1R1 1 _I L J L _L 14 aid 8 I 1 / L.I /
i + EAST 158.12 O Eff -- EAST 0204.00 0 �1 8 1 /
.- \` g .�''`Brg 74,uw:117 BEVERLYA EAST 412.48 DRIVE a I , - , NEST 148.00�1( _ ' I I II/ ( *y;0-,-1
I ' O. 01a&o0 85.20 O 89.00 O 132.28 r 9.83 I Tim' +, •
I I 116 1
`~f 1 r 1 r - �= L-z&38�_: a '1-R.275.00. I
pal I n' I -t L-1R ss25.ar } w ; 1 o-5°0000 15 9j $ \ I\ 1 y,
1 �� 8 gl l sIL yzl 8;; ) \ 1 n
n 1 1 ka� 8 ^1 12 1. V-' q
oW Y ppp$ 15 1 14 13 ff _i $ -i- NEST 147.8511.,e.4s; \ 4 A
a I S5 0 2 e O EAST 140.21 5 S;l e1 \ \\ Ww y
C I b 4t I {�_12 ll 16 al ,, OUTLOT B ;,
N L "1J L J L 1_-tilt-
1 y l 1 1� owRULOFwN.we \ a
'1i.38T --862G- T 8 11
d Z�` L O ,..i F [�SrIB9.P2 jp�I T`�F'" K- 14Ni�M 1 �, 8 \ \
r'FAST 19148 1
N w �- 1�1� EAST 14&00 0-32.40 41_ }A46, \ I
I0 f-- I `.11. ;J gI r T0:98 / '•3 2.5.00.00" 1y7 YS6.+ \ I
I�' -N I y.y� d g1 I L=24.00._( A- L 2&38 17 8la $ ``i I I
"'FFF I I R-2]&o0 .'j 1 8
1 g 1 8 9 €T(-10 A-5ro0'Do• 1 i. Ery
8 10 �3.55'z3• I 6 .E.-2" - \ ,./ /,' O DEFOTES1/2INCH8BTu4INC 400555ONUMENT
r.�� I L=IB.B3w NEST 131.48
-- �\ 1 tr87B2' I 5805,539.E ,`I. , F_J8.42 I - '�' / / I /-= •. DENOTES,/z INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND
/��,��? .39 L -�2.8!_- +.1- I ' ,, / 1 AND MARKED BY REGISTRATION NO.//25 UNLESS
-- 1 r 3>p.: , \,Fy`i 81.84 O 704 D �J s° N. 18 V 1 / -2' /:j� OTHERWISE SHOWN,
- W A ]>Qj�` N'j NEST 152.08 L-5,.& I`>-L=4&80 l //
A �2i 4, /!WOODLANDDCOVEo-9roe'i°G R5t 8..'1:::::
o-a54 oz 11 9 /! ( °1/8 /�/ nTHE EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF
`einnw oi NORTHaD DEGREES MINUTES 39
- 5Wll ♦"$1 $S•bk -_5059_�aTm 7 g $ / i50pj-1, - 1 ```,� / SECONDS WEST,
17
Lil ! 1 7 8J).g�S•o. �'IA,,N EAST Rave z00 I' Ir`�`Y � � Nei ,'25 W / - \ GE.zz IS ASSUMED TO HAVE
-IN' 4 ry / /n' '• , DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:
';/e51ni'L0 zS'W/ J /�- 19 /- 1 (NOT TO SCALE)
i 4.4 • N N8051'39•W n d / /A` t. L, `A 3 I
.'�9/ „ei��% 1-.-+° o-45tir53• //./es �k�-- /I =i i •ti.. -Ti 5--m-
il
NO]99'28•11 j/ ? J /038\- „ %R R S� �y u�i S`I I I
'ri / ^\\\ .F `/ �� A, ail' /�___ $ ,+/ 1?,
„;),/ J L----LJ°
iff
20
6 °•/y� J'• \ / ,y�!)� /�` �A -d"si ! /
,:J ¢ BEING 5 FEU IN wIDTnNUNLESS OTHERWISE
n1 .A' / - ° % 4. ry••/ ks he/� $e r+g O ?/ IINDICATED,FEET WIDTH,UNLESS OTHERWISENo
1J , *'� < G6\,-/ 5S , / �,pp°�• P /,/ J.-.7 INDICATED,AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY
yc'Ns0
K� \� 4 \°'/ / sq. - ,- A-J^^`fiy� LINES,uSHOWN ON THE PLAT.
Rzoze&o5 A Tµ o-uwe'3z• i ;''8' i Q� : 21 /.+-_'. x^' ��4 ffi a
,165 •.'� 1r'-,.ezu /� �2r `�,V`\ g QQ' .N a i.e / a?q g R
L-183.02I . .I` °J/ \ .�/� sz 8 4>2r1` "A,}o'ff s. d� 4,�..I (1040/''N 1
,fir •- 101.75 \-'. 64\ �HtN'Y h � d� W
589,5282_ 58975529.E h. - ' / ... -
F - �` can czaae - ry^a + NORTH
;''4..
p
1�__,_MATCHUNE B --- _-- +/" ALE®
------MATCHUNE B--____:-s9� z I 321°31'59'W J
24.62-"--. 'wortNE RA,INC.
ENGINEERING,PLANNING
AND LAND SURVEYING
SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS
DRAFT
EDEN PRAIRIE WOODS C.R.DOC.NO.
MATCHLINE B -___ R.T.DOC.NO.
zRT ; _.I < � ..t_,�,,, , ��� MATCHLINE B
Itml l��gsi\I_\\\\ ,y / z,�,3 \\ 22 / ,L,r- EAST sm.e
1 &IormNl "P( \\\\ 2 .\� ~[O.eP i ` �fi�. /bg 5.111342'45C Y28.o3_<' `,5' V' r
L ._=__gl- \ �� QQ-� ti � �i �8 L-zza.a R-tto7.eµ _-3 �O e^,p• ;sL=219.20 R=1074.54
,' TI \ 2 Q, / `, .'CI ;@/ 8=11.41'1r G•218.82
8 \\ i.' , 23 w„ 371z
a uw,,11 1/.E V4.SEC zE 521331.59'w .0 G&g..52714'20•W
N8918'33'W-.e_-\\L•"•/ •,� ,. •� ��` -- -- -
P .gl$ 3. - ,��\ - �_ ,y/��g __ _ __ __ __ __ n ._521'31'S9'W
29.08 p�a j 2, p 1 \\\\ t�/ 4!., i ro,},p� 'i s.,,,,,' d9' N%i+a-"•• '�•Y.,�` za.62
RI+. $0 1 \\d 'yP;•x/ " 47� r-, xx N8918'33•W
•"�• „j 51i 3,Ri1T j\. •.�"> /;'11ez, /'35.30
%q9 5105 e' •r w yl \\\ r &1 ll
N893T34•E ~^11 M \\\ 25 /,(i A"/Ct
- I
n a 7 1 1 `P\ \ 8/9 /
-- R ur 11112 '°,p��\ qG=_ _ OUTLOT B I
�pJa Jb 111111 26 �C\ / ^•• • fraLaann a //
g9g9 Yi 27 11� \✓. �•./
• �D'SS.,`,, 129.95 _ _,1U-_ 119.73_- •___ 2122�Y _ 589°90'39•E ` / -777��--G&48 R=361.2
>, c)■Frol.p/z' S89 OO'3s'E 461.95 `� -- -- -- -- _ „ _/ o-12'26's3•L.7dai(7a7» --
nI.
/ I
11 I N .3 A
1 IL1i I b / ��10 VI 0 DENOTES I/2 INCH By 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT
= - \ - \ SET AxD MARKED BY LICENSE NO.47481.
N.
W • DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND
�p3 e
1,1
n R OTHERWISE snowN.
EGISTRAnoN Na.nzs UNLESS
Ci
THE EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF
1 - \ I NORTH ISEEEUM DTOi HAVE
A BEARING OF\ SECONDS WEST,
•P \ 1.11
•
t 1• \ DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:
_ \ ,•' • (NOT TO SCALE)
a�T xn Vic`11, .-11-
y. 7m4 :
-IL-
4'. 220.45(220.00) �''- \ -Tr-S
.3 S89°00'39'E tq '��\ \ I
yF n. .... j`n J, _r1u ___IL____L1a
N t}T21 \ 1t t
6, 01 NO. 7.".. \ BEING
FEET NWIO WIDTH,UNLESS OTHERWISE
II 589°00'39'E 33235(33283) ENA IL. OCATEONWI ADJOININGES OTHERWISENO
1 =" uN `• ' HEIGHTS RJ rv0. \\11 \ IiNDIC LINES,SSHOW1NING RIGHT-OHEPLATF-WAV
iO \ LINE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT.
,so. 2,z07 Fra.A. .,. \ /�I�I�
� 588$5'39'E s lxA l ...... \ 1 \ I �, �rI
R=50 571•37'38.w I \NO���/
D0 h42'53'30' \
\
\
NORTH
G=36.56 L=37.43
S.QUARTER CORNER. I
SEC.M 29.TIP.ire.ROE2 I SCALE IN FEET
®
.;wO.xwx.co.cw SE CORNER-ER.SEC.a9,
__ __ __ 2
------------- ---- FRO•HEWLO.9-. MFRA,WC.
sesmzvr ssasa
- ENGINEERING,PLANNING
AND LAND SURVEYING
SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Agenda May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: VIII.E.
Leslie Stovring Hennepin County Residential Recycling
Public Works/Environmental Grant Application
Requested Action
Move to: Adopt a Resolution authorizing renewal of the Residential Recycling Grant
Application for 2012 through 2015.
Synopsis
The City of Eden Prairie submits an annual report to Hennepin County. This information is used
to determine the amount of recycling grant funds distributed to the City. The majority of these
funds are distributed to residents as a rebate on their utility bills. The funding is expected to be
$152,614 in 2012, which compares to $154,302 in 2011 and resulted in a$6.70 credit to each
residential account with individual refuse collection service. Hennepin County has requested a
Resolution in order to process the Recycling Grant. A copy of the Resolution must be on file
with Hennepin County prior to distribution of the Recycling Grant funds to the City.
Background Information
Hennepin County has renewed their recycling grant program for an additional three (3) years.
The grant funds are distributed to cities to manage their recycling program. As the City has an
open hauling system, the majority of the funds are distributed to residents who are able to recycle
individually. Residents who have communal recycling bins (such as the dumpster-sized
containers at apartments) do not qualify for the rebate. Remaining funds are used for the cleanup
day and to administer education programs on recycling.
Attachments
• Grant Agreement
• Recycling Resolution
Contract No: A120104
RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA,
A-2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 (the "COUNTY"), on behalf of the
Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services, 701 Fourth Avenue South,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1600 ("DEPARTMENT") and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,
8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344-2230 ("CITY").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the County Board, by Resolution No. 11-0476S1, adopted on November 29,
2011, approved the Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy ("Funding Policy")
for the period January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2015, and authorized grant funding for
municipal recycling programs consistent with the Funding Policy; and
WHEREAS, the CITY operates a municipal curbside residential recycling program and
other waste reduction and recycling activities (the "Recycling Program") as described in the
grant application (the "Grant Application") referred to in Section 2 below; and
WHEREAS, the Recycling Program is consistent with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
115A; the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy
Plan; Hennepin County's Solid Waste Management Master Plan; and Hennepin County's
Residential Recycling Funding Policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements
hereinafter set forth, the COUNTY, on behalf of the DEPARTMENT, and the CITY agree as
follows:
1. TERM AND COST OF THE AGREEMENT
a. This Agreement shall commence upon execution and terminate on December 31,
2015.
b. The total grant payment for the year 2012 shall be equal to one hundred fifty-two
thousand six hundred fourteen dollars ($152,614). Grant payments for subsequent
years shall be calculated as set forth in Section 3.
2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
a. The CITY shall operate the Recycling Program as more fully described in the
Funding Policy and the Grant Application. The CITY agrees to submit an updated
Grant Application by February 15 of each year of the term of this Agreement in
order to be eligible for grant funds. The application consists of the Re-TRAC
web-based report and a planning document submitted to the COUNTY describing
the programs or activities the CITY will implement to increase recycling and
make progress toward COUNTY goals. The terms of the Grant Application, as
updated each year, are incorporated herein by reference.
b. In addition to the services referred to above, the CITY agrees as follows:
1) Requests for Proposals and Contracts.
a.) If contracting for curbside recycling services, the CITY shall require a
breakout of the following expenses when renewing or soliciting new
proposals or bids for recycling services:
• Containers—if provided by the hauler;
• Collection service;
• Processing cost per ton;
• Revenue sharing.
b.) The COUNTY recommends the CITY request the following
information in the Request for Proposal/Bid or contract:
• Destination of recyclable materials, including the facility name,
location, and end market;
• Monthly prices for recyclable materials by material type;
• Residue rates at the Materials Recovery Facility (MRF);
• Composition of residue.
2) Materials to be Collected. At a minimum, the CITY shall collect the
following materials curbside:
a.) Newspaper and inserts;
b.) Cardboard boxes;
c.) Glass food and beverage containers;
d.) Metal food and beverage cans;
e.) All plastic containers and lids, #1 —Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET,
PETE),#2 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE),#3 —Vinyl Polyvinyl
Chloride (PVC), #4—Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and#5 —
Polypropylene (PP)plastic bottles, except those that previously
contained hazardous materials or motor oil;
f.) Magazines and catalogs;
g.) Cereal, cracker, pasta, cake mix, shoe, gift, and electronics boxes;
h.) Boxes from toothpaste, medications and other toiletries;
i.) Aseptic and gable-topped containers; and
j.) Mail, office and school papers.
3) Collection Methods. The CITY shall use one of the following systems to
collect materials at the curb:
a.) Single sort system- all materials combined in one container; or
b.) Dual sort system - glass, metal and plastic together with paper
separate.
If one of these two systems is not currently in place, the CITY must submit a
plan with their 2012 Grant Application for converting to a single or dual sort
system by December 31, 2012. If the CITY is unable to meet this deadline, an
alternative implementation plan must be negotiated with and approved by the
2
COUNTY. The implementation plan will include the reasons why an
extension is needed, the projected timeline, and details about each step of the
process. The CITY will also provide the COUNTY with updates to the plan as
implementation progresses.
4) Education and Outreach. The CITY shall:
a.) Use COUNTY terminology when describing recycling guidelines (i.e.
description of materials accepted and not accepted, preparation
guidelines, etc.)
b.) Use images provided by the COUNTY or the Solid Waste
Management Coordinating Board (SWMCB) if using images of
recyclables.
c.) Use the COUNTY's terminology, preparation guidelines and images
on the CITY's website.
d.) Mail a recycling guide once a year to residents using a template
developed jointly through a communications committee and produced
and printed by the COUNTY at the COUNTY's expense. If the CITY
does not want to use the template produced by the COUNTY, the
CITY may develop its own guide at the municipality's expense, but it
must be approved by the COUNTY. If the CITY relies on the hauler to
provide the recycling guide, this guide would also require approval by
the COUNTY.
e.) Complete two additional education activities from a menu of options
developed by the communications committee to support the priority
message campaign. Templates will be provided by the COUNTY.
Any print material that communicates residential recycling guidelines that
were not provided by the COUNTY template will require COUNTY
approval. This does not apply to waste reduction and reuse, articles on
recycling that do not include guidelines, and social media posts. The
COUNTY will respond within five business days to any communication
piece submitted.
5) Use of Grant Funds.
a.) Grant funds can be used for all Recycling Program expenses including
capital and operating costs. Expenses associated with residential
collection of organics are considered eligible Recycling Program
expenses. However, yard waste expenses are not eligible Recycling
Program expenses. If organics and yard waste are commingled, the
organics expenses must be tracked separately.
b.) All grant funds accepted from the COUNTY must be used for
Recycling Program capital and operating expenses in the year granted.
c.) The CITY may not charge its residents through property tax, utility
fees or any other method for that portion of the costs of its Recycling
Program funded by COUNTY grant funds.
d.) The CITY shall establish a separate accounting mechanism, such as a
project number, activity number, or fund that will separate recycling
and waste reduction revenues and expenditures from other municipal
activities, including solid waste and yard waste activities.
3
e.) Recycling and waste reduction activities, revenues, and expenditures
are subject to audit by the COUNTY.
f.) The CITY shall not retain any grant funds in excess of actual
Recycling Program expenses.
g.) If the CITY does not contract for curbside recycling services, the
CITY will receive grant funds provided that at least ninety percent
(90%) of the grant funds are credited back to residents and the CITY
meets all minimum program requirements. The additional ten percent
(10%) may be used for CITY administrative and promotional
expenses.
6) Reporting Requirements.
a.) The CITY shall submit an annual recycling report to the COUNTY
utilizing the Re-TRAC web-based reporting system by February 15 of
each year. If the CITY is unable to access the Re-TRAC system, the
COUNTY must be contacted by February 1 to make arrangements for
alternative filing of the required report.
b.) The CITY will not report residue as a part of recycling tonnages. The
CITY will make arrangements with its hauler to report residue
separately.
c.) The CITY shall annually measure the participation rate in the curbside
Recycling Program during the month of October. The rate will be
calculated by dividing the number of households setting out recycling
by the total number of households (accounts) with recycling service.
The participation rate will be reported in Re-TRAC.
d.) The CITY shall submit an annual planning document to the COUNTY
describing the programs or activities the CITY will implement to
increase recycling and make progress toward COUNTY goals.
e.) To help monitor progress, the CITY shall provide an update on
recycling tonnages and program activities to the COUNTY upon
request. The CITY shall then provide the quarterly tonnage report
received from its haulers or make arrangements with the haulers to
send the information directly to the COUNTY.
7) Recycling Performance. On an annual basis, the CITY shall demonstrate that
a reasonable effort has been made to maintain and increase the average
amount of recyclables collected from their residential Recycling Program to at
least 725 pounds per household or achieve a minimum recovery rate of 80%
by December 31, 2015. Alternatively, if the CITY has a method in place to
accurately measure total waste generation (garbage and recycling), then the
CITY may choose a 35% recycling rate as the performance standard. To
ensure the accuracy of data for these metrics the CITY will be required, upon
request, to provide documentation on the methodology used to calculate
performance. To the extent practicable, the results should rely on actual data
rather than estimates.
Failure by the CITY to demonstrate measureable progress towards one of
these goals will result in the requirement that a Recycling Improvement Plan
be submitted by the CITY within 90 days of being notified by the COUNTY.
The Recycling Improvement Plan must be negotiated with and approved by
4
the COUNTY. The Recycling Improvement Plan will include actions the
CITY will take to improve the performance of its Recycling Program to
achieve the 2015 goals. The plan will focus on program changes and
additional activities in the following areas: materials collected, sort method,
type of container, frequency of collection, education and outreach,
performance measurement, contract management, and incentives. Funding
will be withheld until the CITY's Recycling Improvement Plan is approved by
the COUNTY.
In cooperation with the COUNTY, the CITY may be required to participate in
waste and recycling sorts to identify recovery levels of various recyclables in
their community. Based on the results of the study, the COUNTY and the
CITY will collaborate to increase the recovery of select recyclable materials
being discarded in significant quantities.
8) Public Entity Recycling. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section §115A.151,
the CITY shall ensure that facilities under its control, from which mixed
municipal solid waste is collected, have containers for at least three recyclable
materials, such as, but not limited to, paper, glass, plastic, and metal, and
transfer all recyclable materials collected to a recycler.
3. METHOD OF PAYMENT
a. The COUNTY will annually distribute to Hennepin County municipalities grant
funds only to the extent the COUNTY receives SCORE funds from the State of
Minnesota. SCORE funds are based on revenue received by the State of Minnesota from
a sales tax on garbage collection and disposal fees. SCORE funds are subject to change
based on actual revenue received by the State and funds allocated by the legislature. The
following formula will be utilized to determine the CITY's SCORE grant for each year:
#of Households Served
Curbside by CITY X Total SCORE Revenue _ Grant Funds
Received by COUNTY Distributed to
Total#of Households Served from State of Minnesota CITY
Curbside in COUNTY
b. Under no circumstances will the COUNTY's distribution of grant funds exceed
the CITY's proportion of SCORE fund revenues received by the COUNTY.
c. The initial grant fund payment will be forwarded after the County Board receives
and approves this Agreement signed by an authorized official of the CITY.
Provided the CITY is otherwise in compliance with the terms of this Agreement,
future grant fund payments will be made after submittal by the CITY and
approval by the COUNTY of the updated Grant Application as described in
Section 2 and receipt by the COUNTY of SCORE funds from the State of
Minnesota.
d. Annual grant payments will be made to the CITY in two equal payments. One
payment will be made after the COUNTY receives the Grant Application, which
consists of the Re-TRAC report and a planning document. A second payment will
5
be made after the report has been approved, measurable progress toward the 2015
goal has been confirmed, and, if necessary, a Recycling Improvement Plan has
been approved by the COUNTY. If the CITY meets the COUNTY requirements,
both payments will be made during the same calendar year.
4. PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS
INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CITY shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the services. Nothing is
intended or should be construed as creating or establishing the relationship of a
partnership or a joint venture between the parties or as constituting CITY as the agent,
representative, or employee of the COUNTY for any purpose. CITY is and shall remain
an independent contractor for all services performed under this Agreement. CITY shall
secure at its own expense all personnel required in performing services under this
Agreement. Any personnel of CITY or other persons while engaged in the performance
of any work or services required by CITY will have no contractual relationship with the
COUNTY and will not be considered employees of the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall
not be responsible for any claims that arise out of employment or alleged employment
under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the
State of Minnesota on behalf of any personnel, including, without limitation, claims of
discrimination against CITY, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees. CITY shall
defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents,
volunteers, and employees from all such claims irrespective of any determination of any
pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons
shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind
from the COUNTY, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital
care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' Compensation, Re-employment Compensation,
disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits.
7. INDEMNIFICATION
CITY agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials,
officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action,
judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees,
resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of CITY, a subcontractor, anyone
directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions
they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and
against all loss by reason of the failure of CITY to perform any obligation under this
Agreement.
8. INSURANCE
A. With respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, CITY agrees at
all times during the term of this Agreement, and beyond such term when so
required, to have and keep in force the following insurance coverages, either
under a self-insurance program or purchased insurance:
6
Limits
1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence
basis with contractual liability coverage:
General Aggregate $2,000,000
Products—Completed Operations Aggregate 2,000,000
Personal and Advertising Injury 1,500,000
Each Occurrence—Combined Bodily
Injury and Property Damage 1,500,000
2. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability:
Workers' Compensation Statutory
Employer's Liability. Bodily injury by:
Accident—Each Accident 500,000
Disease—Policy Limit 500,000
Disease—Each Employee 500,000
3. Professional Liability—Per Claim 1,500,000
Aggregate 2,000,000
The professional liability insurance must be
maintained continuously for a period of two years
after the termination of this Agreement.
B. An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability insurance coverages is an
acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits.
The above establishes minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole
responsibility of CITY to determine the need for and to procure additional
insurance which may be needed in connection with this Agreement. Upon written
request, CITY shall promptly submit copies of insurance policies to the
COUNTY.
CITY shall not commence work until it has obtained required insurance and filed
with the COUNTY, a properly executed Certificate of Insurance establishing
compliance. The certificate(s) must name Hennepin County as the certificate
holder and as an additional insured for the liability coverage(s) for all operations
covered under the Agreement. If the certificate form contains a certificate holder
notification provision, the certificate shall state that the insurer will endeavor to
mail the COUNTY 30 day prior written notice in the event of cancellation of any
described policies. If CITY receives notice of cancellation from an insurer, CITY
shall fax or email a copy of the cancellation notice to the COUNTY within two
business days.
CITY shall furnish to the COUNTY updated certificates during the term of this
Agreement as insurance policies expire. If CITY fails to furnish proof of
insurance coverages, the COUNTY may withhold payments and/or pursue any
other right or remedy allowed under the contract, law, equity, and/or statute. The
7
COUNTY does not waive any rights or assume any obligations by not strictly
enforcing the requirements set forth in this section.
C. Duty to Notify. CITY shall promptly notify the COUNTY of any claim, action,
cause of action or litigation brought against CITY, its employees, officers, agents
or subcontractors, which arises out of the services contained in this Agreement.
CITY shall also notify the COUNTY whenever CITY has a reasonable basis for
believing that CITY and/or its employees, officers, agents or subcontractors,
and/or the COUNTY, might become the subject of a claim, action, cause of
action, criminal arrest, criminal charge or litigation arising out of and/or related to
the services contained in this Agreement. Failure to provide the notices required
by this section is a material violation of the terms and conditions of this
Agreement.
9. DATA PRACTICES
CITY, its officers, agents, owners, partners, employees, volunteers and subcontractors
shall abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 (MGDPA), the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) and implementing regulations, if applicable, and all other
applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or
confidentiality. CITY agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY, its
officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from any claims resulting from
CITY's officers', agents', owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or
subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of such protected data, or other
noncompliance with the requirements of this section. CITY agrees to promptly notify the
COUNTY if it becomes aware of any potential claims, or facts giving rise to such claims,
under the MGDPA. The terms of this section shall survive the cancellation or
termination of this Agreement.
10. RECORDS —AVAILABILITY/ACCESS
Subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, Subd. 5, CITY agrees
that the COUNTY, the State Auditor, or any of their authorized representatives, at any
time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary,
shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books,
documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and
procedures of CITY and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. CITY shall
maintain these materials and allow access during the period of this Agreement and for six
(6) years after its termination or cancellation.
11. SUCCESSORS, SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENTS
A. CITY binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the
COUNTY for all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the contract
documents.
B. CITY shall not assign, transfer or pledge this Agreement and/or the services to be
performed, whether in whole or in part, nor assign any monies due or to become
due to it without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. A consent to assign
shall be subject to such conditions and provisions as the COUNTY may deem
8
necessary, accomplished by execution of a form prepared by the COUNTY and
signed by CITY, the assignee and the COUNTY. Permission to assign, however,
shall under no circumstances relieve CITY of its liabilities and obligations under
the Agreement.
C. CITY shall not subcontract this Agreement and/or the services to be performed,
whether in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the COUNTY.
Permission to subcontract, however, shall under no circumstances relieve CITY of
its liabilities and obligations under the Agreement. Further, CITY shall be fully
responsible for the acts, omissions, and failure of its subcontractors in the
performance of the specified contractual services, and of person(s) directly or
indirectly employed by subcontractors. Contracts between CITY and each
subcontractor shall require that the subcontractor's services be performed in
accordance with the terms and conditions specified. CITY shall make contracts
between CITY and subcontractors available upon request.
12. MERGER AND MODIFICATION
A. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is
contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and
negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter. All items that are
referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made a part of this
Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and
referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
B. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this
Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an
amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties.
13. DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION
A. If CITY fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to
administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement, it shall be
in default. Unless CITY's default is excused by the COUNTY, the COUNTY
may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety.
Additionally, failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall be just
cause for the COUNTY to delay payment until CITY's compliance. In the event
of a decision to withhold payment, the COUNTY shall furnish prior written notice
to CITY.
B. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, CITY shall
remain liable to the COUNTY for damages sustained by the COUNTY by virtue
of any breach of this Agreement by CITY.
C. The above remedies shall be in addition to any other right or remedy available to
the COUNTY under this Agreement, law, statute, rule, and/or equity.
D. The COUNTY's failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to
exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or
waiver of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not
9
constitute a general waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the
Agreement.
E. This Agreement may be canceled with or without cause by either party upon
thirty(30) day written notice.
F. Upon early termination or cancellation of this Agreement, the CITY shall itemize
any and all grant funds expenditures up to the date of termination or cancellation
and return such grant funds not yet expended.
G. Upon written notice, COUNTY may immediately suspend or cancel this
Agreement in the event any of the following occur: (i) COUNTY does not obtain
anticipated funding from an outside source for this project; (ii) funding for this
project from an outside source is withdrawn, frozen, shut-down, is otherwise
made unavailable or COUNTY loses the outside funding for any other reason; or
(iii) COUNTY determines, in its sole discretion, that funding is, or has become,
insufficient. COUNTY is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided
after notice and effective date of termination. In the event COUNTY cancels this
Agreement pursuant to the terms in this paragraph 13(G), COUNTY shall pay any
amount due and payable prior to the notice of suspension or cancellation pursuant
to the terms herein except that COUNTY shall not be obligated to pay any amount
as or for penalties, early termination fees, charges, time and materials for services
not then performed, costs, expenses or profits on work done.
14. SURVIVAL OF PROVISIONS
Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term, cancellation or
termination of this Agreement include but are not limited to: INDEPENDENT
CONTRACTOR; INDEMNIFICATION; INSURANCE; DATA PRACTICES;
RECORDS-AVAILABILITY/ACCESS; DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION;
PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE; and MINNESOTA LAW GOVERNS.
15. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
In order to coordinate the services of the CITY with the activities of the Department of
Environmental Services so as to accomplish the purposes of this contract, Dave McNary,
Solid Waste Division Manager, or his or her successor, shall manage this contract on
behalf of the COUNTY and serve as liaison between the COUNTY and the CITY.
16. COMPLIANCE AND NON-DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION
A. CITY shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes,
regulations, rules and ordinances currently in force or later enacted.
B. CITY shall comply with all applicable conditions of the specific referenced grant.
17. SUBCONTRACTOR PAYMENT
As required by Minnesota Statutes Section 471.425, Subd. 4a, CITY shall pay any
subcontractor within ten (10) days of CITY's receipt of payment from the COUNTY for
undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. CITY shall pay interest of 11/percent
10
per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid
on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an
unpaid balance of$100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than
$100.00, CITY shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor
who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from a prime contractor must be
awarded its costs and disbursements, including any attorney's fees, incurred in bringing
the action.
18. PAPER RECYCLING
The COUNTY encourages CITY to develop and implement an office paper and
newsprint recycling program.
19. NOTICES
Any notice or demand which must be given or made by a party under this Agreement or
any statute or ordinance shall be in writing, and shall be sent registered or certified mail.
Notices to the COUNTY shall be sent to the County Administrator with a copy to the
originating Department at the address given in the opening paragraph of the Agreement.
Notice to CITY shall be sent to the address stated in the opening paragraph of the
Agreement.
20. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CITY affirms that to the best of CITY's knowledge, CITY's involvement in this
Agreement does not result in a conflict of interest with any party or entity which may be
affected by the terms of this Agreement. CITY agrees that, should any conflict or
potential conflict of interest become known to CITY, CITY will immediately notify the
COUNTY of the conflict or potential conflict, specifying the part of this Agreement
giving rise to the conflict or potential conflict, and will advise the COUNTY whether
CITY will or will not resign from the other engagement or representation.
21. PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE
CITY agrees, to the extent applicable, to abide by the current Hennepin County
Communications Policy(available upon request). This obligation includes, but is not
limited to, CITY not using the term"Hennepin County" or any derivative in any
promotional literature, advertisements of any type or form or client lists without the
express prior written consent of a COUNTY Department Director or equivalent.
22. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN
The Laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations
concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations
between the parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for
any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of
Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties will be in the
appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. If any provision of this
Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be
affected.
11
COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION
Reviewed by the County Attorney's COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Office STATE OF MINNESOTA
By:
Assistant County Attorney Chair of Its County Board
Date:
ATTEST:
Deputy/Clerk of County Board
Date:
By:
Richard P. Johnson, County Administrator
Date:
By:
Assistant County Administrator, Public Works
Recommended for Approval Date:
By:
Director, Department of Environmental Services
Date:
MUNICIPALITY
CITY warrants that the person who executed
this Agreement is authorized to do so on behalf of
CITY as required by applicable articles,
bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.*
Signature:
Name (Printed):
Title:
Date:
*CITY shall submit applicable documentation(articles,bylaws,resolutions or ordinances)that confirms the signatory's
delegation of authority. This documentation shall be submitted at the time CITY returns the Agreement to the COUNTY.
Documentation is not required for a sole proprietorship.
12
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION
FOR THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
MUNICIPAL RECYCLING GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 115A.551, each county must develop and
implement or require political subdivisions within the county to develop and implement
programs, practices, or methods designed to meet its recycling goal; and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County Ordinance 13 requires each city to implement a recycling
program to enable the County to meet its recycling goals; and
WHEREAS, the County has adopted a Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding
Policy for Source-Separated Recyclables to distribute funds to cities for the development and
implementation of waste reduction and recycling programs from January 1, 2012 through
December 31, 2015; and
WHEREAS, to be eligible to receive these County funds, cities must meet the conditions
set forth in the "funding policy."
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council authorizes the
submittal of Municipal Recycling Grant Applications for 2012 through 2015 for the Hennepin
County Residential Recycling Programs.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that as a condition to receive funds under the
Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy the City agrees to implement recycling
programs as committed to by its submission of the Hennepin County Municipal Residential
Recycling Grant Application.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 15, 2012.
Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
SEAL
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Agenda May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. #12-5815 ITEM NO.: VIII.F.
Leslie Stovring Approve Joint Powers Agreement with
Public Works/Environmental the MN Department of Natural Resources
Requested Action
Move to: Approve the Joint Powers Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources for Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention and Management
Synopsis
Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District(RPBCWD)has requested that the City of Eden
Prairie establish a municipal aquatic invasive species inspection program. To aid in this effort,the
City has hired an intern to manage the watercraft inspector program for the summer. In order for
City staff to receive training for the program, a Joint Powers Agreement(JPA)with the Dept. of
Natural Resources (DNR) is required.
Background Information
On March 14, 2012,RPBCWD sent a letter acknowledging the City's efforts in establishing an
aquatic invasive species (AIS)program. A proposed inspection program was approved on May 1,
2012 by the City Council that targets Riley, Red Rock, Mitchell and Round Lakes. The hope is that
implementation of the inspection program will help in stopping the spread of invasive species such as
zebra mussels. As part of the program, the City agreed to hire an intern to supplement the inspection
hours and manage the program with our consultant. In order for the DNR to provide the training
required for AIS detection and prevention,they require that the City sign a JPA. The JPA will be
effective through December 31, 2012. All internship hours would be paid out of the City's water
quality education program. Any other expenses would be paid out of the stormwater utility.
The JPA includes the following provisions:
• The DNR will provide training of individuals or contractors employed by the City and will
certify them as authorized inspectors.
• The DNR will provide training of licensed peace officers to enforce state invasive species law.
• The City will ensure there is adequate law enforcement staffing to support the inspectors.
• The City will ensure that individuals employed by the City and/or their contractors have
completed the training and certification program.
• The City will ensure that inspections are conducted in accordance with current DNR procedures.
• The City will support education and outreach programs to help increase public awareness about
the risks AIS pose and their ability to contribute to preventing or managing the spread of AIS.
• The City and DNR will regularly meet to develop the AIS program.
Attachments
• Joint Powers Agreement
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
Between the Department of Natural Resources and
the City of Eden Prairie
for Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention and Management
This Agreement is made by and between the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), an
administrative agency of the State of Minnesota and the City of Eden Prairie, a local government
unit with purposes and powers as set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapters 412 (referred to
generally as the Party or Parties). This Agreement is entered into pursuant to authority granted
to DNR pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 84.026 and to the Parties by Minnesota Statutes
section 471.59.
WHEREAS AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES (AIS) are nonnative species that cause or may
cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health or threatens or may threaten
natural resources or the use of natural resources in the state;
WHEREAS DNR has been authorized and charged with responsibility by the state legislature to
establish a statewide program to prevent and manage the spread of AIS in coordination with
other governmental entities; DNR has in its employ conservation officers trained and authorized
to enforce the state invasive species laws; and DNR has developed AIS inspection protocols;
WHEREAS Governmental Unit has authority under Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.221, to
regulate and police public facilities within the boundaries of the Governmental Unit; and
WHEREAS DNR and Governmental Unit are committed to three core principles:
• Coordination of their authority and resources to develop a reasonable and effective water-
related equipment inspection requirement to stop the spread of AIS in the state and
prevent the introduction of new AIS;
• a collaborative, cooperative approach to AIS management and prevention;
• ensuring continued access to public waters.
NOW, THEREFORE it is mutually agreed by and between the Parties as follows:
1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this agreement is to enhance Minnesota's capacity to prevent the
spread of AIS by enabling local governmental units to perform AIS inspections and manage
access to water resources in keeping with the three principles stated above.
2.TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
A. DNR or its delegee will provide training of individuals and/or contractors employed by
the Governmental Unit as inspectors and, on successful completion of training and testing
requirements, will certify individuals as authorized inspectors in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes section 84D.105, subd. 2(a).
B. DNR will provide training of licensed peace officers identified by Governmental Unit to
enforce the state invasive species law, as it pertains to the transport,possession and use of
water-related equipment.
C. Governmental Unit will ensure that there is adequate law enforcement staffing to support
Governmental Unit inspectors when inspection stations are being operated.
D. Governmental Unit will design and implement an AIS inspection program, approved by
DNR, utilizing existing authorities and the authority granted to inspectors under
Minnesota Statutes sections 84D.105, subd. 2(b) and 84D.10, subd. 3(a), clauses 1, 3, and
4 (the Program).
E. Governmental Unit will designate individuals employed by the Governmental Unit and/or
individuals working for contractors employed by Governmental Unit to serve as
inspectors for the Program and ensure that these individuals complete the required
training and certification in paragraph 2A of this agreement prior to performing
inspections. Governmental Unit will help coordinate training of licensed peace officers
as provided under paragraph 2B of this agreement.
F. Governmental Unit will provide staffing for one or more inspection stations established
under the Program with trained and certified inspectors, who will exercise inspection
authorities in accordance with current DNR procedures and manuals. General inspection
procedures include:
i. Visually and tactilely inspecting water-related equipment to determine whether
aquatic invasive species, aquatic macrophytes, or water is present;
ii. Instructing persons on how to comply with AIS laws by removing AIS, draining,
decontaminating, or treating AIS and water-related equipment to prevent the
transportation and spread of aquatic invasive species, aquatic macrophytes, and water;
iii. With owner's consent, assisting with the removal of AIS and decontamination of
water-related equipment;
iv. Issuing verbal orders to prohibit placing water-related equipment, that has AIS
attached or water that has not been drained, into waters of the state; and
v. Contacting Conservation Officers or licensed peace officers if a person transporting
watercraft or water-related equipment refuses to take corrective actions to remove
AIS or fails to comply with requirements to drain water prior to leaving the water
access.
G. Governmental Unit will support education and outreach projects and programs designed
to increase public awareness and knowledge of the risks AIS pose to water resources and
public capacity to contribute to the effort to prevent and manage the spread of AIS.
H. Governmental Unit will bear all costs incurred in completing the tasks and
responsibilities herein, except that DNR will provide, at its sole expense, staff and/or
contracted professionals to coordinate and conduct the training described herein.
I. Governmental Unit and DNR will regularly meet to collaboratively develop the above-
described elements of Governmental Unit AIS Program and potential models that could
be used by other local governments to help the prevent the spread of AIS, guided by the
three core principles stated above.
2
3. INDEMNIFICATION. Each party to this agreement shall be liable for its own acts and the
results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the
other party, its agents, volunteers or employees. It is understood and agreed that liability and
damages arising from the parties' acts and omissions are governed by the provisions of the
Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466, the Minnesota Tort Claims Act,
Minnesota Statutes section 3.736, and other applicable laws.
4. TERM AND TERMINATION. The agreement becomes effective on March 15, 2012, or when
fully executed, whichever occurs later. This agreement expires on December 31, 2012. The
agreement may be terminated with or without cause by 30-day written notice to the other Party.
5. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This agreement supersedes any prior or contemporaneous
representations or agreements, whether written or oral, between DNR and Governmental Unit,
and contains the entire agreement with regard to the subject matter herein.
6. AMENDMENTS. This agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by each of the
Parties.
7. NOTICE. Any written communication required under this agreement will be addressed to the
other party as follows, except that any party may change its address for notice by so notifying the
other party in writing:
To DNR:
Ecosystem Management and Protection Section Manager
Minnesota Depai tiiient of Natural Resources
500 Lafayette Road
St. Paul MN 55155-4025
To Governmental Unit:
City of Eden Prairie
City Center
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
8. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. This agreement will be governed by and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this
agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent
jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota.
9.WAIVERS. The waiver by DNR or Governmental Unit of any breach or failure to comply with
any provision of this agreement by the other Party will not be construed as nor will it constitute a
continuing waiver of such provision or a waiver of any other breach of or failure to comply with
any other provision of this agreement.
10. STATE AUDITS. Under Minnesota Statutes section 16C.05, subd. 5, Governmental Unit
books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this agreement
are subject to examination by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as
appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this agreement.
3
11. GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES. Governmental Unit and DNR must comply with the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statute section 13, as it applies to all data
provided by DNR under this agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received,
stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Governmental Unit under this agreement. The civil
remedies of Minnesota Statute section 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this
clause by either Governmental Unit or DNR.
If Governmental Unit receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause,
Governmental Unit must immediately notify DNR. DNR will give Governmental Unit
instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto execute and
deliver this agreement.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
By:
Title:
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
By:
Title:
Date:
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRE
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
4
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Agenda May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: IC# 12-5812 ITEM NO.: VIII.G.
Leslie Stovring Phase III Pond Inventory Program
Public Works /Environmental
Requested Action
Move to: Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Wenck Associates in the amount of
$114,815 for the Phase III Pond Inventory Program.
Synopsis
The proposal from Wenck is to provide an inventory of the stormwater ponding system within
watersheds for Duck and Red Rock Lake. The inventory will be used to select projects for
completion after 2013. This project is the third step towards completing the city-wide stormwater
treatment inventory required in the Schedule of Compliance (SOC) set by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency. The cost of pond inventory will be paid out of the stormwater utility.
Background Information
The City has been working on inventorying our stormwater system since 2003. The current
inspection program includes visual inspection of stormwater treatment areas (including lakes,
ponds, wetlands, ditches, raingardens, drainage swales and creek segments) to identify problems
that require repair. However, the SOC requires additional inspections to determine stormwater
treatment volume and effectiveness for each stormwater treatment area. The scope of work that
will be used to complete the inventory was approved by the MPCA on April 18, 2011.
The City has identified approximately 90 stormwater treatment areas within the study area. The
services Wenck will provide include items such as the following:
• Survey current pond depth and bathymetric contours for each selected water body.
• Compare existing conditions with as-built information.
• Calculate the removal efficiency(%) for phosphorus and sediment for each pond.
• Determine which ponds need sediment removal.
• Develop a model to evaluate the watershed runoff entering each lake from the study areas;
this will include collecting sediment cores from each lake.
• Determine whether opportunities exist to upgrade functionality of the ponds in areas where
additional treatment may benefit the lakes.
The estimated cost for 2012 is $114,815 based on analysis of 90 stormwater treatment areas
within the study area. Stormwater treatment areas that receive no public drainage do not need to
be included in the inventory. Costs will be paid from the storm water utility fund.
Attachments
• Proposal
• Professional Services Agreement
,n
'4:
`_- R
`'- ''' PROPOSAL FOR
- ,,, - - PHASE III
` POND INVENTORY,
4 t . - MAINTENANCE
PROGRAM
'evil. EVALUATION
w 474 . 'i Prepared for:
} 111 sa4 41004 i:i DCMA
4 4e :
F,,1% `i r .,� +Patel,
Ot t 14:'L ed:6,l.J. r. -. ,.
iia
` ,` ' '• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
8080 Mitchell Road
., — __ �, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
It
I, •
, ti' , { - Prepared by:
i
Fs r. • -
a Add Wend<
Mr w.,;'miners - Scientists
.- = '*.-� 's Wenck Associates, Inc.
r 1800 Pioneer Creek Ctr.
P.O. Box 249
O Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
= T' �^ May 4, 2012
aF l cetf.
s .. d
Wenck Associates,Inc.
1800 Pioneer Creek Ctr.
P.O,Box 249
1n' Maple Plain,MN 55359-0249
11 F encl< (763)479-4200
Fax(763)479-4242
Engineers • Scientists E-mail:wenckmp@wenck.com
May 4, 2012
Ms. Leslie A. Stovring
Environmental Coordinator
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: Proposal for Phase Ill
Pond Inventory, Maintenance Program Evaluation
Dear Ms. Stovring:
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to assist the City of Eden Prairie
with the Phase III Subwatershed Pond Inventory, Maintenance Program Evaluation and
Lake Modeling. Our proposal will demonstrate that the Wenck approach is the best choice
for the City both now and for future maintenance evaluations.
We have assembled the same team of engineers and scientists that completed the Phase II
effort. Our team has considerable experience in providing the GIS, inspection, modeling,
and reporting services necessary to build upon the success of the Phase I and Phase II
projects for the City. Our team is enthusiastic about continuing to serve the City, and we
trust you will find Wenck to be well-qualified and responsive to your needs. Our
employee-owners pride themselves on providing unmatched service, sound strategic
advice, and technical excellence that fosters good decision-making and helps realize on-
the-ground improvements. Thanks for the opportunity to work with you again.
Sincerely,
WENCK ASSOCIATES
Joe Bischoff Ed Matthiesen, P.E.
Project Manager Principal
(763)-479-4229 (763) 479-4208
jbischoff@wenck.com ematthiesen@wenck.com
Table of Contents
Why Wenck? 1
Project Approach 2
Tasks, Schedule, and Budget 9
Wencl<
Engineers•Scientists
Why Wenck?
Wenck Associates, Inc. is a full-service environmental and civil engineering firm with
experience in planning, design, construction, and maintenance of water resource and storm
drainage facilities. We have worked with municipal, county, watershed, and private clients to
inventory and evaluate their infrastructure and maintenance plans to assure compliance with
federal, state, and local regulations as well as to meet engineering and good housekeeping
standards. We understand and are experienced with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's
NPDES stormwater general permit and industrial stormwater standards.
Wenck completed the City of Eden Prairie's Local Water Management Plan, the Plan Update,
Nondegradation Plan, and Phase I of the Pond Inventory, Maintenance Program Evaluation and
brings to the City skills and experience that expand on those previous projects. Presently, we are
wrapping up Phase II of the Pond Inventory project(Eden Lake and Neill Lake subwatersheds
pond inventory). The proposed 3th phase of the study will apply approaches similar to those
applied in Phase I and Phase II. As applicable, Wenck will take the Nondegradation Assessment
and Local Water Management planning documents a step further to evaluate whether current
conditions satisfy goals outlined in the plans. Throughout this proposal, we intend to demonstrate
the following benefits the Wenck team offers the City.
• Easy-to-Use Technical Information
Wenck engineers and scientists pride themselves on technical excellence. More important,
however, Wenck staff is focused on conveying the meaning of this technical information to
the client and how it will impact their business or operation. Just recently, Wenck staff
presented Staring Lake subwatershed study results to the MPCA meeting in tabular and
graphic formats. The MPCA used terms like "impressed" and"great job" during Wenck's
presentation. Wenck's presentation of the 122 ponds inventoried was easy to digest, concise
yet instructive.
• Established Working Relationships
The Wenck team is very familiar with surface water resources in the City. We wrote your
Nondegradation Assessment and Local Water Management Plan and Plan Update. We have
worked with City staff, files, and models in the past. This familiarity will save the City time
and money in not having to re-educate us on how you execute projects.
• Looking to the Future
Wenck intends to build upon the success of the Staring Lake subwatershed by adding to the
electronic, GIS-based approach will enable easy transfer and display of information to City
staff, residents and policy-makers.
1 -iWendk
Engineers-Scientists
Project Approach
The Wenck team proposes to provide the City of Eden Prairie with the third phase of engineering
consultant services expanding the existing inventory and analysis of stormwater facility
performance and maintenance needs. As shown in Figure 1, the Phase III study will include
subwatersheds tributary to Duck Lake and Red Rock Lake. Wenck's approach will build upon
the Phase I and II efforts, and continue use of an all-electronic method of evaluating, collecting
and processing the pond inventory and maintenance needs. This method will allow for easy
transfer of data to City staff and application to other subwatersheds in the City and add to the
Phase I and II database.
Task 1 — Stormwater System Analysis
This task consists of identifying basins where the City is responsible for maintenance and
selecting basins for further field evaluation. (Throughout this proposal, we will refer to
constructed stormwater ponds and stormwater wetlands collectively as "basins.") Basin
identification will be coordinated with City staff to determine which basins are located on City
property, within City right-of-way, or under a drainage and utility easement. We expect to locate
basins on City property and within City right-of-way using GIS-based parcel information from
the City. We will continue collaborating with City staff in determining which basins may be
under drainage and utility easements.
There appear to be between 75 to 100 basins located in the Phase III subwatersheds based on
Figure 1. We will verify that number using the Local Drainage Plan Update, Local Water
Management Plan, and GIS files with 2-foot contour data.
Task 1 also includes two important meetings. The first is the kick-off meeting with City staff to
further discuss project goals and refine the scope of work as necessary to ensure it satisfies the
items noted in the "Schedule of Compliance" issued by the MPCA and MS4 requirements. We
suggest inviting MPCA to this meeting to ensure that they buy into the approach and agree to
proposed reductions in field data collected. We understand that a second meeting may be
necessary to ensure that all relevant data has been collected from the City for Wenck to start the
project. After completion of Task 1, the Wenck Project Manager will meet with City staff a third
time to determine which basins will be selected to undergo additional analysis in Tasks 2 and 3.
Task 1 Deliverable:
■ Spreadsheet or database listing the water bodies identified for inclusion in the project.
Task 2— Sedimentation Survey
For Task 2, Wenck will visually inspect and perform a bathymetric survey for each basin
identified in Task 1. This information will be used to determine if maintenance is required and
assess the basin pollutant removal performance (Task 3).
2 -. Wendk
Engineers•Scientists
Project Approach (cont.)
Wenck will review or collect the following by visual inspection:
• Review storm sewer, grading, and utility plans available for each basin prior to field
evaluation. If possible, these plans will be taken into the field with the inspector to allow
for easy comparison between the proposed and constructed facilities.
• Photograph basin features.
• Identify and report plain-sight maintenance needs (i.e., erosion, accumulation of debris
on trash racks, repairs to damaged structures)using the "Stormwater System Follow-Up
Checklist"provided in the Request for Proposals. This information will be entered into
our hand-held GPS unit such that it can be easily downloaded into the City Water Body
Inventory database or a spreadsheet back in the office.
• Estimate the percentage of the pond's permanent pool surface regularly covered by
aquatic vegetation.
• Measure the basin length and width.
We will conduct the sedimentation survey using a survey-grade sub-centimeter GPS unit. The
survey will include a bathymetric survey of the basin, estimation of accumulated sediment depth,
water surface elevation, and basin outlet/overflow data. Cross-sections will be surveyed
throughout each basin to determine the bathymetry, and we will estimate the depth of sediment
using a metal probing rod. We do not believe that soil borings and subsequent soil analysis are
warranted to determine the original bottom of the basin. Similar to work we have done in County
Ditches and at Albert Lea Lake (18 feet of accumulated sediment), the probe is advanced into the
basin muck until resistance is felt(the original basin bottom). We will record that depth and
compare it to the design, if available.
After completing Task 2, Wenck will meet with City staff to review the results of Task 2 and the
scope of work for Task 3.
Task 2 Deliverable:
• Expand the spreadsheet or database from Task 1 to include the measured parameters from
Task 2.
Task 3 — Basin Analysis
Task 3 analyzes the data collected from Task 2 to determine the sedimentation level, pollutant
removal effectiveness of the basin, and,ultimately, which basins need sediment removal.
Wenck will use ArcMap software to import the GPS survey data from the field evaluation to
determine the degree of sediment deposition in each basin. The ArcMap software will allow
Wenck to calculate the volume of the basin below any elevation. Therefore, we can quickly
calculate the basin surface area, permanent pool volume, and live storage volume. From this
information, we will then estimate the degree of sedimentation by comparing the volume to the
design or as-built plans for each basin. Where design or as-built plans are not available, we will
determine the degree of sedimentation using the probing rod results for those cases.
3 ddWenckk
Engineers-Scientists
Project Approach (cont.)
Using the spreadsheet from Task 2, Wenck will calculate the water quality volume draining to
the basin and the permanent pool volume within the basin. Flood elevations will be obtained
from design plans, or estimated using the top elevation of the basin. Following guidance from
the Minnesota Stormwater Manual, map the path of stormwater flow, and calculate the length to
width and ratios of permanent and temporary storage area to the drainage area.
Wenck will determine the load-based removal efficiency of each basin using a numerical
relationship developed from the computer model P8. We will run the P8 model with a"dummy"
subwatershed and variety of pond permanent pool volumes to determine the total suspended
solids (TSS) and total phosphorus (TP)removal efficiencies. These removal efficiencies will
then be compared to those for a basin designed to NURP standards. This will produce a simple
relationship with which to compare each basin evaluated in the field.
Wenck will prioritize basin maintenance based on the degree of sedimentation found in each
pond, its hydrologic proximity to public waters, and the potential water quality benefits of
increasing permanent pool volumes. We will discuss with City staff whether the plain-sight
maintenance needs identified during the field evaluation should be included in our prioritization.
The City may wish to exclude and evaluate these items on a case-by-case basis and incorporate
them into ongoing maintenance programs.
Wenck and City staff will meet at the completion of Task 3 to discuss the priority rankings and
determine which basins will be selected for the NURP Criteria Analysis in Task 4.
Task 3 Deliverable:
■ Expand the spreadsheet or database from Task 2 to include the calculated parameters
from Task 3. The data will be in a format compatible with the City's GIS system.
Task 4 — NURP Criteria Analysis
The purpose of Task 4 is to quantify the water quality improvement of dredging or expansion of
the priority basins with the goal of satisfying NURP standards. The rankings developed in Task
3 will indicate which basins require dredging or could be expanded. We do not anticipate that all
basins included in the field inventory will be selected for analysis in Task 4 because of physical
(site restraints) or ownership limitations.
NURP standards require that stormwater ponds have a permanent pool volume that is at least
equal to the runoff from a 2.5-inch, 24-hour storm event. For the priority basins, Wenck will
estimate the amount of dredging or expansion that is practical and re-evaluate the load-based
removal efficiency.
Task 4 Deliverable:
• Expand the spreadsheet or database from Task 3 to include the revised load-based
removal efficiency from Task 4.
4 AddWencl<
Engineers-Scientists
Project Approach (cont.)
Task 5- P8 and Bathtub Analysis
The purpose of Task 5 is to provide the City with an expanded assessment of City pond
performance in the Red Rock Lake and Duck Lake watersheds. Wenck proposes the following
additional tasks to provide the City with updating the Phase I P8 and lake-response models for
Duck Lake and Red Rock Lake.
P8 is an industry-standard model developed to assess pollutant loading in urban watersheds.
Similarly, BATHTUB is widely-used model used to assess in-lake pollutant concentrations as a
result of external and internal loads. P8 will be used to generate and predict external loads for
the BATHTUB model.
We will complete the following tasks to accomplish the scope of work:
Task 5A. Data Analysis
Task A entails the collection and processing of data through GIS for developing
watershed inputs for the P8 Model. The same process for developing model inputs will
be used for this analysis as was used to create the models for the Nondegradation Plan.
Input data includes subwatershed area, the watershed impervious fraction, and the
pervious area curve number.
Task 5B. P8 Modeling
Wenck developed a P8 model for Phase I that was an expansion of the Staring Lake
Watershed P8 model for the City of Eden Prairie's Nondegradation Plan. We will
expand on this model to include the Phase II basins identified for field evaluation in Pond
Inventory Project. Watershed information will be determined from the land use analysis
and basin data will be taken directly from the field evaluation. The model will be
validated using water quality monitoring data where available.
Task 5C. Evaluate P8 Model Results
P8 will be used to calculate watershed runoff loads for TSS and TP. Inserting basin data
obtained from Pond Inventory Project will allow us to calculate the approximate amount
of TSS and TP removed by the basins. These values, in turn, will serve as input for the
BATHTUB analysis.
Task 5D. Obtain Sediment Cores from Duck Lake and Red Rock Lake Bottom
Sediments.
To assess the role of watershed loads in affecting Duck Lake and Red Rock Lake water
quality, it is important to know the level of internal loading in the lakes. To assess the
internal load, Wenck will collect sediment cores from the deepest part of the lake and
measure the anoxic release of phosphorus from the sediments. These results will be
combined with dissolved oxygen and temperature profiles from Duck Lake and Red Rock
Lake to develop annualized phosphorus loads from the sediments.
Task 5E. BATHTUB Modeling and Analysis.
Once the watershed load and internal load has been determined using a similar
methodology as completed in Phase I for Staring Lake and Phase II for Eden Lake and
5 AdidWencl<
Engineers-Scientists
Project Approach (cont.)
Neill Lake, Wenck will expand the spreadsheet version of BATHTUB to assess in-lake
water quality response. This model will be conducted for up to 10 years depending on
the availability of the data. The lake response model will then be used to determine the
required level of effort in pond maintenance to meet established lake water quality goals
such as state eutrophication standards.
Task 5F.Draft Technical Memorandum to Summarize Results.
Wenck will draft a technical memorandum to describe the modeling methods, results, and
conclusions. We will evaluate the results of the Pond Inventory Project and discuss the
implication on Duck Lake and Red Rock Lake. For example, the Pond Inventory Project
may show that significant maintenance of stormwater ponds is necessary; however, the
P8 and BATHTUB assessment may show that Duck Lake and Red Rock Lake are still
protected, and perhaps being improved, although pond maintenance is needed.
Task 6— Report Requirements
Upon completion of the analysis, Wenck will complete a final report to summarize the methods
and results of the study. The report will detail the methods of the field evaluation and analysis
from Tasks 2-5, and highlight critical maintenance activities including individual basin sediment
volumes. Plain-sight maintenance activities will be summarized using tables and figures rather
than a detailed explanation for each individual basin visited during the field evaluation. We will
also discuss easement needs for the City to consider.
The report will present cost considerations for the recommended maintenance activities. Among
these, dredging and disposal of sediment is likely the most costly. Therefore, our planning-level
cost estimates will include costs for sediment characterization, mobilization, site preparation,
dredging, sediment disposal, minor storm sewer work, site restoration, and erosion control. We
will also discuss cost impacts if contamination is identified in any dredged material.
The report will also identify whether proposed improvements will require a permit. Local, state
and federal permits for construction may be required. Most importantly, though, is that the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act(WCA)may apply to any proposed work in stormwater
wetlands. The report will address what actions by the City do and do not require a WCA permit.
Wenck will submit a draft report to City staff for review and approval prior to finalizing the
report. We expect one meeting with City staff and one meeting with the Conservation
Commission to present the results and recommendations of the study.
Task 6 Deliverables:
• Final spreadsheet or database from Task 4.
• All GIS files.
• Project report to include all office, field and modeling analyses conducted by the project
team.
6 +didWenckk
Engineers-Scientists
Project Approach (cont.)
Task 7— Meetings, Project Management & Project Summaries
Task 7 includes attendance at the seven meetings noted in Tasks 1-6 above, mileage, and project
coordination time. The task also includes drafting of a project summary to be attached to each
invoice. The project summary will detail the amount billed to date, tasks which need to be
completed, the estimated cost to complete these tasks, and the projected timeline for completion
of the project.
Task 7 Deliverables:
■ Attendance at meetings specified in Tasks 1-6 above.
■ A project summary report with each monthly invoice.
7 Wencl<
Engineers-Scientists
Tasks, Schedule, and Budget
There are six primary tasks to complete the Phase III project. As we identified in the Project
Approach, Wenck has added Task 7 to account for meeting time, project management, and
project summaries. We are ready to begin Task 1 as soon as the City issues the notice to
proceed. Our proposed schedule (Table 1) is flexible and can be adjusted to meet the specific
needs of the City.
Table 1. Tasks and schedule to complete Phase III of Eden Prairie's Pond Inventory and
Maintenance Evaluation and P8 and BATHTUB models.
2012 2013
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Phase 3412341234512341234512341234123451234
0 Notice to Proceed
1 Stormwater S stem Anal sis
2 Sedimentation Survey
3 Basin Analysis
4 NURP Criteria Analysis
5 P8 and Bathtub Analysis
6 Report 1111.111-11
The proposed budget has been estimated on a time and materials basis and includes expenses
(mileage,printing, etc.). The tasks and cost per task are identified in Table 2.
Table 2. Budget to complete the Eden Prairie Pond Inventory and Maintenance
Evaluation.
Task ID Description Not-to-Exceed
Amount
TASK 1 Stormwater System Analyses $7,370
TASK 2 Sedimentation Survey $360 / pond
TASK 3 Pond Analysis $165 / pond
TASK 4 NURP Criteria Analysis $105 / pond
TASK 5 P8 or BATHTUB meetings
5A Data Analysis $3,522
5B P8 Modeling $81 / pond
5C Evaluate P8 Model Results $4,125
5D Obtain Sediment Cores from Neill Lake and Eden $7,000
Lake
5E BATHTUB Modeling and Analysis $6,683
5F Draft Technical Memorandum $5,190
TASK 6 Report Requirements $137 / pond
TASK 7 Meetings, Project Management & Project Summaries $8,700
8
Tasks, Schedule, and Budget
The cost to complete the project is presented in Table 2 on a per task basis. In discussion with
City staff, the total number of basins to be considered for the inventory during Phase III is 90.
The total cost of the proposed project, assuming 90 basins is $114,815.
9
Rev. 3-29-12
Standard Agreement for Professional Services
This Agreement is made on the Fourth day of May, 2012, between the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota (hereinafter "City"), whose business address is 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN
55344, and Wenck Associates Inc., a Minnesota Environmental Consultant (hereinafter "Consultant")
whose business address is 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, P.O. Box 249. Maple Plain, MN 55359.
Preliminary Statement
The City has adopted a policy regarding the selection and hiring of consultants to provide a variety of
professional services for City projects. That policy requires that persons, firms or corporations
providing such services enter into written agreements with the City. The purpose of this Agreement is
to set forth the terms and conditions for the provision of professional services by Consultant for
Phase III Pond Inventory, Maintenance Program Evaluation hereinafter referred to as the "Work".
The City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. Scope of Work. The Consultant agrees to provide the professional services shown in Exhibit
"A" (Proposal for Phase III Pond Inventory, Maintenance Program Evaluation) in connection
with the Work. The terms of this Agreement shall take precedence over any provisions of the
Consultants proposal and/or general conditions including proposals and/or general conditions.
If the Consultants proposal is attached as the Exhibit A Scope of Work, City reserves the right
to reject any general conditions in such proposal.
2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from May 15, 2012 through December 31, 2013
the date of signature by the parties notwithstanding. This Agreement may be extended upon
the written mutual consent of the parties for such additional period as they deem appropriate,
and upon the terms and conditions as herein stated.
3. Compensation for Services. City agrees to pay the Consultant on an hourly basis plus
expenses in a total amount not to exceed $114,815 for the services as described in Exhibit A.
A. Any changes in the scope of the work which may result in an increase to the
compensation due the Consultant shall require prior written approval by an authorized
representative of the City or by the City Council. The City will not pay additional
compensation for services that do not have prior written authorization.
B. Special Consultants may be utilized by the Consultant when required by the complex
or specialized nature of the Project and when authorized in writing by the City.
C. If Consultant is delayed in performance due to any cause beyond its reasonable
control, including but not limited to strikes, riots, fires, acts of God, governmental
actions, actions of a third party, or actions or inactions of City, the time for
performance shall be extended by a period of time lost by reason of the delay.
Consultant will be entitled to payment for its reasonable additional charges, if any, due
to the delay.
1
Rev. 3-29-12
4. City Information. The City agrees to provide the Consultant with the complete information
concerning the Scope of the Work and to perform the following services:
A. Access to the Area. Depending on the nature of the Work, Consultant may from time
to time require access to public and private lands or property. As may be necessary,
the City shall obtain access to and make all provisions for the Consultant to enter upon
public and private lands or property as required for the Consultant to perform such
services necessary to complete the Work.
B. Consideration of the Consultant's Work. The City shall give thorough consideration to
all reports, sketches, estimates, drawings, and other documents presented by the
Consultant, and shall inform the Consultant of all decisions required of City within a
reasonable time so as not to delay the work of the Consultant.
C. Standards. The City shall furnish the Consultant with a copy of any standard or
criteria, including but not limited to, design and construction standards that may be
required in the preparation of the Work for the Project.
D. Owner's Representative. A person shall be appointed to act as the City's
representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. He or
she shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information,
interpret, and define the City's policy and decisions with respect to the services
provided or materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to the work covered
by this Agreement.
5. Method of Payment. The Consultant shall submit to the City, on a monthly basis, an
itemized invoice for professional services performed under this Agreement. Invoices
submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City for:
A. Progress Payment. For work reimbursed on an hourly basis, the Consultant shall
indicate for each employee, his or her name, job title, the number of hours worked,
rate of pay for each employee, a computation of amounts due for each employee, and
the total amount due for each project task. Consultant shall verify all statements
submitted for payment in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.38 and
471.391. For reimbursable expenses, if provided for in Exhibit A, the Consultant shall
provide an itemized listing and such documentation as reasonably required by the City.
Each invoice shall contain the City's project number and a progress summary showing
the original (or amended) amount of the contract, current billing, past payments and
unexpended balance of the contract.
B. Suspended Work. If any work performed by the Consultant is suspended in whole or
in part by the City, the Consultant shall be paid for any services performed prior to
receipt of written notice from the City of such suspension, all as shown on Exhibit A.
C. Payments for Special Consultants. The Consultant shall be reimbursed for the work of
special consultants, as described in Section 3B, and for other items when authorized in
writing by the City.
D. Claims. To receive any payment on this Agreement, the invoice or bill must include
the following signed and dated statement: "I declare under penalty of perjury that this
account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid."
6. Project Manager and Staffing. The Consultant has designated Joe Bischoff and Ed
Matthiesen to serve on the Project. They shall be assisted by other staff members as
2
Rev. 3-29-12
necessary to facilitate the completion of the Work in accordance with the terms established
herein. Consultant may not remove or replace these designated staff from the Project without
the approval of the City.
7. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence in
the performance of its services as is ordinarily exercised by members of the profession under
similar circumstances in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Consultant shall be liable to the fullest
extent permitted under applicable law, without limitation, for any injuries, loss, or damages
proximately caused by Consultant's breach of this standard of care. Consultant shall put forth
reasonable efforts to complete its duties in a timely manner. Consultant shall not be
responsible for delays caused by factors beyond its control or that could not be reasonably
foreseen at the time of execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall be responsible for
costs, delays or damages arising from unreasonable delays in the performance of its duties.
8. Audit Disclosure. Any reports, information, data, etc. given to, or prepared or assembled by
the Consultant under this Agreement which the City requests to be kept confidential, shall not
be made available to any individual or organization without the City's prior written approval.
The books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Consultant or
other parties relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the City and either the
Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor for a period of six (6) years after the effective date of
this Contract. The Consultant shall at all times abide by Minn. Stat. 13.01 et seq., the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, to the extent the Act is applicable to data and
documents in the possession of the Consultant.
9. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party by seven (7) days written
notice delivered to the other party at the address written above. Upon termination under this
provision, if there is no fault of the Consultant, the Consultant shall be paid for services
rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the
City terminates the Agreement because the Consultant has failed to perform in accordance
with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Consultant, and the City may
retain another consultant to undertake or complete the work identified in Paragraph 1.
10. Subcontractor. The Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under
this Agreement except as noted in the Scope of Work, without the express written consent of
the City. The Consultant shall pay any subcontractor involved in the performance of this
Agreement within the ten (10) days of the Consultant's receipt of payment by the City for
undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Consultant fails within that time to
pay the subcontractor any undisputed amount for which the Consultant has received payment
by the City, the Consultant shall pay interest to the subcontractor on the unpaid amount at the
rate of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month. The minimum monthly interest penalty
payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid balance of less than
$100, the Consultant shall pay the actual interest penalty due to the subcontractor. A
subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Consultant
shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing
the action.
3
Rev. 3-29-12
11. Independent Consultant. At all times and for all purposes herein, the Consultant is an
independent contractor and not an employee of the City. No statement herein shall be
construed so as to find the Consultant an employee of the City.
12. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not
discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color,
creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance,
disability, sexual orientation or age. The Consultant shall post in places available to
employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this non-
discrimination clause and stating that ail qualified applicants will receive consideration for
employment. The Consultant shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph
in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such
work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. The Consultant
further agrees to comply with all aspects of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota
Statutes 363.01, et. seq., Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990.
13. Assignment. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein,
without the written consent of the other party.
14. Services Not Provided For. No claim for services furnished by the Consultant not
specifically provided for herein shall be honored by the City.
15. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion hereof is, for
any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such decision shall
not affect the remaining provisions of this Agreement.
16. Entire Agreement. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement
supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject
matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of
the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed
by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein.
17. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In providing services hereunder, the Consultant
shall abide by statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of
services to be provided. The Consultant and City, together with their respective agents and
employees, agree to abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Data Practices Act, Minnesota
Statutes Section 13, as amended, and Minnesota Rules promulgated pursuant to Chapter 13.
Any violation of statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the services to be
provided shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and entitle the City to
immediately terminate this Agreement.
18. Waiver. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not
affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement.
19. Indemnification. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, and
employees harmless from any liability, claims, damages, costs, judgments, or expenses,
including reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent attributable to a negligent or otherwise
wrongful act or omission (including without limitation professional errors or omissions) of the
Consultant, its agents, employees, or subcontractors in the performance of the services
4
Rev. 3-29-12
provided by this Agreement and against all losses by reason of the failure of said Consultant
fully to perform, in any respect, all obligations under this Agreement. Consultant further
agrees to indemnity the City for defense costs incurred in defending any claims, unless the
City is determined to be at fault.
20. Insurance.
A. General Liability. Prior to starting the Work, Consultant shall procure, maintain and
pay for such insurance as will protect against claims for bodily injury or death, or for
damage to property, including loss of use, which may arise out of operations by
Consultant or by any subcontractor or by anyone employed by any of them or by
anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. Such insurance shall include, but
not be limited to, minimum coverages and limits of liability specified in this Paragraph,
or required by law. The policy(ies) shall name the City as an additional insured for the
services provided under this Agreement and shall provide that the Consultant's
coverage shall be primary and noncontributory in the event of a loss.
B. Consultant shall procure and maintain the following minimum insurance coverages and
limits of liability on this Project:
Worker's Compensation Statutory Limits
Employer's Liability $500,000 each accident
$500,000 disease policy limit
$500,000 disease each employee
Comprehensive General
Liability $1,500,000 property damage and bodily injury per
occurrence
$2,000,000 general aggregate
$2,000,000 Products— Completed Operations
Aggregate
$100,000 fire legal liability each occurrence
$5,000 medical expense
Comprehensive Automobile
Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit each accident (shall
include coverage for all owned, hired and non-owed
vehicles.
Umbrella or Excess Liability $1,000,000
C. The Comprehensive General/Commercial General Liability policy(ies) shall be
equivalent in coverage to ISO form CG 0001, and shall include the following:
a. Premises and Operations coverage with no explosions, collapse, or underground
damage exclusion (XCU).
b. Products and Completed Operations coverage. Consultant agrees to maintain
this coverage for a minimum of two (2) years following completion of its work.
Said coverage shall apply to bodily injury and property damage arising out of
the products-completed operations hazard.
5
Rev. 3-29-12
c. Personal injury with Employment Exclusion (if any) deleted.
d. Broad Form CG0001 0196 Contractual Liability coverage, or its equivalent.
e. Broad Form Property Damage coverage, including completed operations, or its
equivalent.
f. Additional Insured Endorsement(s), naming the "City of Eden Prairie" as an
Additional Insured, on ISO form CG 20 10 07 04 or such other endorsement
form as is approved by the City.
g. If the Work to be performed is on an attached community, there shall be no
exclusion for attached or condominium projects.
h. "Stop gap" coverage for work in those states where Workers' Compensation
insurance is provided through a state fund if Employer's liability coverage is not
available.
i. Severability of Insureds provision.
D. Professional Liability Insurance. The Consultant agrees to provide to the City a
certificate evidencing that they have in effect, with an insurance company in good
standing and authorized to do business in Minnesota, a professional liability insurance
policy. Said policy shall insure payment of damage for legal liability arising out of the
performance of professional services for the City. Said policy shall provide an
aggregate limit of$2,000,000. Said policy shall not name the City as an insured.
E. Consultant shall maintain in effect all insurance coverages required under this
Paragraph at Consultant's sole expense and with insurance companies licensed to do
business in the state in Minnesota and having a current A.M. Best rating of no less
than A-, unless specifically accepted by City in writing. In addition to the requirements
stated above, the following applies to the insurance policies required under this
Paragraph:
a. Ail policies, except the Professional Liability Insurance policy, shall be written
on an "occurrence" form ("claims made" and "modified occurrence" forms are
not acceptable);
b. All policies, except the Professional Liability Insurance policy, shall be apply on
a "per project" basis;
c. All policies, except the Professional Liability Insurance and Worker's
Compensation Policies, shall contain a waiver of subrogation naming "the City
of Eden Prairie";
d. All policies, except the Professional Liability Insurance and Worker's
Compensation Policies, shall name "the City of Eden Prairie" as an additional
insured;
e. All policies, except the Professional Liability Insurance and Worker's
Compensation Policies, shall insure the defense and indemnity obligations
assumed by Consultant under this Agreement; and
f. All polices shall contain a provision that coverages afforded there under shall
not be canceled or non-renewed, nor shall coverage limits be reduced by
endorsement, without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City.
6
Rev. 3-29-12
A copy of the Consultant's Certificate of Insurance which evidences the
compliance with this Paragraph 20, must be filed with City prior to the start of
Consultant's Work. Upon request a copy of the Consultant's insurance declaration
page, Rider and/or Endorsement, as applicable shall be provided. Such documents
evidencing Insurance shall be in a form acceptable to City and shall provide
satisfactory evidence that Consultant has complied with all insurance requirements.
Renewal certificates shall be provided to City prior to the expiration date of any of the
required policies. City will not be obligated, however, to review such Certificate of
Insurance, declaration page, Rider, Endorsement or certificates or other evidence of
insurance, or to advise Consultant of any deficiencies in such documents and receipt
thereof shall not relieve Consultant from, nor be deemed a waiver of, City's right to
enforce the terms of Consultant's obligations hereunder. City reserves the right to
examine any policy provided for under this paragraph.
F. Effect of Consultant's Failure to Provide Insurance. If Consultant fails to provide the
specified insurance, then Consultant will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City,
the City's officials, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability and expense
(including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses of litigation) to the extent necessary
to afford the same protection as would have been provided by the specified insurance.
Except to the extent prohibited by law, this indemnity applies regardless of any strict
liability or negligence attributable to the City (including sole negligence) and regardless of
the extent to which the underlying occurrence (i.e., the event giving rise to a claim which
would have been covered by the specified insurance) is attributable to the negligent or
otherwise wrongful act or omission (including breach of contract) of Consultant, its
subcontractors, agents, employees or delegates. Consultant agrees that this indemnity
shall be construed and applied in favor of indemnification. Consultant also agrees that if
applicable law limits or precludes any aspect of this indemnity, then the indemnity will be
considered limited only to the extent necessary to comply with that applicable law. The
stated indemnity continues until all applicable statutes of limitation have run.
If a claim arises within the scope of the stated indemnity, the City may require Consultant
to:
a. Furnish and pay for a surety bond, satisfactory to the City, guaranteeing
performance of the indemnity obligation; or
b. Furnish a written acceptance of tender of defense and indemnity from
Consultant's insurance company.
Consultant will take the action required by the City within fifteen (15) days of receiving
notice from the City.
21. Ownership of Documents. All plans, diagrams, analyses, reports and information generated
in connection with the performance of the Agreement ("Information") shall become the
property of the City, but Consultant may retain copies of such documents as records of the
services provided. The City may use the Information for its purposes and the Consultant also
may use the Information for its purposes. Use of the Information for the purposes of the
project contemplated by this Agreement ("Project") does not relieve any liability on the part of
the Consultant, but any use of the Information by the City or the Consultant beyond the scope
of the Project is without liability to the other, and the party using the Information agrees to
defend and indemnify the other from any claims or liability resulting therefrom.
7
Rev. 3-29-12
22. Dispute Resolution/Mediation. Each dispute, claim or controversy arising from or related to
this Service Agreement or the relationships which result from this Agreement shall be subject
to mediation as a condition precedent to initiating arbitration or legal or equitable actions by
either party. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the mediation shall be in accordance with the
Commercial Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association then currently in
effect. A request for mediation shall be filed in writing with the American Arbitration
Association and the other party. No arbitration or legal or equitable action may be instituted
for a period of 90 days from the filing of the request for mediation unless a longer period of
time is provided by agreement of the parties. Cost of mediation shall be shared equally
between the parties. Mediation shall be held in the City of Eden Prairie unless another
location is mutually agreed upon by the parties. The parties shall memorialize any agreement
resulting from the mediation in a Mediated Settlement Agreement, which Agreement shall be
enforceable as a settlement in any court having jurisdiction thereof.
23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota.
24. Conflicts. No salaried officer or employee of the City and no member of the Board of the City
shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Contract. The violation of this provision
renders the Contract void. Any federal regulations and applicable state statutes shall not be
violated.
25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall
be considered an original.
26. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and
supersedes all prior communications, understandings and agreements relating to the subject
matter hereof, whether oral or written.
Executed as of the day and year first written above.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Mayor
City Manager
FIRM NAME
By: 7i/a'
Its: U e Pelesdpka
8
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Calendar May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 12-5809 ITEM NO.: VIII.H.
Mary Krause Award Contract to Pearson Brothers,
Public Works/Engineering Inc. for the 2012 Sealcoating Project
Requested Action
Move to: Award Contract for 2012 Street Sealcoating to Pearson Brothers, Inc., in the
amount of$584,265.36.
Synopsis
Bids were received on Thursday, April 26, 2012 for the 2012 Sealcoating project. Three bids
were received and are tabulated as follows:
Pearson Brothers, Inc. $584,265.36
Allied Blacktop Company $599,974.12
ASTECH $691,580.35
Background Information
Street sealcoating is an annual street maintenance project. Bid prices increased above 2011 bid
prices; however prices for the 2011 project had actually decreased. Unit prices for this years'
project are similar to prices of the 2010 unit prices. The 2012 Operating and Maintenance
budget for sealcoating is $210,000. The balance of approximately $375,000 between the actual
project costs and the budgeted amount will be taken from the a combination of CIP pavement
maintenance fund for street sealcoating and the Parks and Recreation Division trail and parking
lot maintenance funds.
Attachment
• Bid Tabulation
2012 Seal Coating
City of Eden Prairie I.C. #12-5809
Pearson Brothers,Inc. Allied Blacktop Co. ASTECH Corp.
EST. UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
1 FA-3,C1.A 215,117 Sq.Yd. $1.26 $271,047.42 $1.40 $301,163.80 $1.49 $320,524.33
(0.34 gal/sq.yd.CRS-2P)
Bit. Seal Coat gray or black only
20 lbs/sq.yd.FA-3,CL.A
2 Streets 173,179 Sq.Yd. $1.22 $211,278.38 $1.22 $211,278.38 $1.38 $238,987.02
FA-2,Modified
(0.24 gal/sq.yd/CRS-2)
C1.A(1/8"Trap Rock)
(20 lbs/sq.yd.FA-2 Mod)
Bituminous Seal Coat
3 Trails 22,866 Sq.Yd. $1.50 $34,299.00 $1.29 $29,497.14 $2.10 $48,018.60
FA-2,Modified
C1.A(1/8"Trap Rock)
(0.24 gal/sq.yd/CRS-2)
Bituminous Seal Coat
(16 lbs/sq.yd.FA-2 Mod)
4 Parking Lots 40,024 Sq. Yd. $1.69 $67,640.56 $1.45 $58,034.80 $2.10 $84,050.40
FA-2,Modified
(0.28 gal/sq.yd/CRS-2P)
CI.A(1/8"trap rock)
(16 lbs/sq.yd.FA-2 Mod.)
TOTAL BASE BID $584,265.36 $599,974.12 $691,580.35
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Calendar May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 12-5811 ITEM NO.: VIII.I.
Mary Krause Award Contract to GMH Asphalt
Public Works/Engineering Corporation for the 2012 Bituminous
Overlay Project
Requested Action
Move to: Award Contract for 2012 Street Bituminous Overlay project to GMH Asphalt
Corporation in the amount of$1,323,980.
Synopsis
Bids were received on Thursday, April 26, 2012 for the 2012 Bituminous Overlay project. Six
bids were received and are tabulated as follows:
GMH Asphalt Corporation $1,323,980
Midwest Asphalt Corporation $1,396,125
Hardrives, Inc. $1,396,750
Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $1,438,500
Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $1,468,925
William Mueller& Sons, Inc. $1,574,550
Background Information
The Bituminous Overlay is an annual street maintenance project. The bituminous prices for this
year's overlay project are about 15% more than the 2011 overlay bituminous prices. The 2012
Operating and Maintenance budget for milling and overlay is $217,000. The Pavement
Management CIP fund for 2012 has allocated an additional $1,740,000 for pavement
maintenance. In addition to the overlay project, the pavement maintenance CIP fund also
finances seal coating and cracksealing projects.
Attachment
• Bid Tabulation
2012 Bituminous Overlay
City of Eden Prairie I.C. #12-5811
GMH Asphalt Corp. Midwest Asphalt Corp. Hardrives,Inc. Bituminous Roadways,Inc. Northwest Asphalt Inc. Wm.Mueller&Sons
EST. UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
MnDOT Mix
1 (SPWEB240B) 19,500 Tons $54.66 $1,065,870.00 $54.75 $1,067,625.00 $55.00 $1,072,500.00 $54.60 $1,064,700.00 $56.75 $1,106,625.00 $55.90 $1,090,050.00
2 MnDOT Mix
(SPWEB340B) 3,000 Tons $55.87 $167,610.00 $55.00 $165,000.00 $56.00 $168,000.00 $54.60 $163,800.00 $57.35 $172,050.00 $59.65 $178,950.00
3 Bituminous Edge
Milling 5,000 Lin.Ft. $0.55 $2,750.00 $1.50 $7,500.00 $2.00 $10,000.00 $1.05 $5,250.00 $1.00 $5,000.00 $3.00 $15,000.00
Bituminous Full Depth
4 Milling 195,000 Sq.Yds. $0.45 $87,750.00 $0.80 $156,000.00 $0.75 $146,250.00 $1.05 $204,750.00 $0.95 $185,250.00 $1.49 $290,550.00
TOTAL BASE BID $1,323,980.00 $1,396,125.00 $1,396,750.00 $1,438,500.00 $1,468,925.00 $1,574,550.00
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Agenda May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: IC# 08-5717 ITEM NO.: VIII.J.
Leslie Stovring Erosion Stabilization Design Analysis
Public Works/Environmental Project for Lower Riley Creek
Requested Action
Move to: Approve the proposal from Short Elliot Hendrickson for completion of a Design
Analysis and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for stabilization and restoration
of an erosion site within Lower Riley Creek at an estimated cost of$49,659.
Synopsis
The Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed has completed an analysis of Lower Riley Creek to
locate areas that require bluff stabilization. Riley Creek is listed as impaired by the State
impaired for turbidity(sediment) and stabilization of these bluff areas is required to delist the
creek. This project will stabilize and restore a significantly eroded section of Lower Riley Creek
that lies between Prospect Road and Spring Road. The construction would be completed
concurrently with the construction of Prospect Road to minimize project costs and impacts to
residents who adjoin the project area. The costs for this project will be paid out of the
stormwater utility fund.
Background Information
A design analysis and creek stabilization project is proposed for a section of Riley Creek south of
Prospect Road. The plan is to restore this reach by making alterations to the creek channel and
banks that are resilient and self-maintaining while minimizing disturbance to the surrounding
area. The project will include removal of excess trees and brush from the project area to allow
native vegetation to re-establish along the banks to provide long-term stability to the area.
Methods such as incorporation of rock vanes or log control structures would be used to slow
creek flow and focus the flow into the center of the channel. The scope of work will include:
• Collection of hydrologic and hydraulic information for the creek
• Analysis and modeling of the channel and flow conditions
• Floodplain assessment
• Wetland and seep identification
• Coordination of plans and permitting requirements with the technical agencies, including the
Dept. of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff
Creek Watershed District
• Construction administration, including preparation of plans and specifications, staking of
construction limits and field inspections
The estimated cost for the design services, preparation of the plan and specifications, and
construction administration is $49,659.
Attachment
SEH Professional Services Agreement/ Proposal
Rev. 3-29-12
Standard Agreement for Professional Services
This Agreement is made on the 15th day of May, 2012, between the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
(hereinafter "City"), whose business address is 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, and
Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc, a Minnesota consulting firm (hereinafter "Consultant") whose business
address is 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343.
Preliminary Statement
The City has adopted a policy regarding the selection and hiring of consultants to provide a variety of
professional services for City projects. That policy requires that persons, firms or corporations
providing such services enter into written agreements with the City. The purpose of this Agreement is
to set forth the terms and conditions for the provision of professional services by Consultant for
Lower Riley Creek Reach H2-H3 Stabilization Project Design, Bidding and Construction Phase
Services hereinafter referred to as the "Work".
The City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. Scope of Work. The Consultant agrees to provide the professional services shown in Exhibit
"A" (RE: Lower Riley Creek Reach H2-H3 Stabilization Project) in connection with the Work.
The terms of this Agreement shall take precedence over any provisions of the Consultants
proposal and/or general conditions including proposals and/or general conditions. If the
Consultants proposal is attached as the Exhibit A Scope of Work, City reserves the right to
reject any general conditions in such proposal.
2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from May 15, 2012 through December 31, 2013
the date of signature by the parties notwithstanding. This Agreement may be extended upon
the written mutual consent of the parties for such additional period as they deem appropriate,
and upon the terms and conditions as herein stated.
3. Compensation for Services. City agrees to pay the Consultant on an hourly basis plus
expenses in a total amount not to exceed $ 49,659.00 for the services as described in Exhibit
A.
A. Any changes in the scope of the work which may result in an increase to the
compensation due the Consultant shall require prior written approval by an authorized
representative of the City or by the City Council. The City will not pay additional
compensation for services that do not have prior written authorization.
B. Special Consultants may be utilized by the Consultant when required by the complex
or specialized nature of the Project and when authorized in writing by the City.
C. If Consultant is delayed in performance due to any cause beyond its reasonable
control, including but not limited to strikes, riots, fires, acts of God, governmental
actions, actions of a third party, or actions or inactions of City, the time for
performance shall be extended by a period of time lost by reason of the delay.
1
Rev. 3-29-12
Consultant will be entitled to payment for its reasonable additional charges, if any, due
to the delay.
4. City Information. The City agrees to provide the Consultant with the complete information
concerning the Scope of the Work and to perform the following services:
A. Access to the Area. Depending on the nature of the Work, Consultant may from time
to time require access to public and private lands or property. As may be necessary,
the City shall obtain access to and make all provisions for the Consultant to enter upon
public and private lands or property as required for the Consultant to perform such
services necessary to complete the Work.
B. Consideration of the Consultant's Work. The City shall give thorough consideration to
all reports, sketches, estimates, drawings, and other documents presented by the
Consultant, and shall inform the Consultant of all decisions required of City within a
reasonable time so as not to delay the work of the Consultant.
C. Standards. The City shall furnish the Consultant with a copy of any standard or
criteria, including but not limited to, design and construction standards that may be
required in the preparation of the Work for the Project.
D. Owner's Representative. A person shall be appointed to act as the City's
representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. He or
she shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information,
interpret, and define the City's policy and decisions with respect to the services
provided or materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to the work covered
by this Agreement.
5. Method_ of Payment. The Consultant shall submit to the City, on a monthly basis, an
itemized invoice for professional services performed under this Agreement. Invoices
submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City for:
A. Progress Payment. For work reimbursed on an hourly basis, the Consultant shall
indicate for each employee, his or her name, job title, the number of hours worked,
rate of pay for each employee, a computation of amounts due for each employee, and
the total amount due for each project task. Consultant shall verify all statements
submitted for payment in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.38 and
471.391. For reimbursable expenses, if provided for in Exhibit A, the Consultant shall
provide an itemized listing and such documentation as reasonably required by the City.
Each invoice shall contain the City's project number and a progress summary showing
the original (or amended) amount of the contract, current billing, past payments and
unexpended balance of the contract.
B. Suspended Work. If any work performed by the Consultant is suspended in whole or
in part by the City, the Consultant shall be paid for any services performed prior to
receipt of written notice from the City of such suspension, all as shown on Exhibit A.
C. Payments for Special Consultants. The Consultant shall be reimbursed for the work of
special consultants, as described in Section 3B, and for other items when authorized in
writing by the City.
D. Claims. To receive any payment on this Agreement, the invoice or bill must include
the following signed and dated statement: "I declare under penalty of perjury that this
account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid."
2
Rev. 3-29-12
6. Project Manager and Staffing. The Consultant has designated Carter Schulze and Justin
Klabo to serve on the Project. They shall be assisted by other staff members as necessary to
facilitate the completion of the Work in accordance with the terms established herein.
Consultant may not remove or replace these designated staff from the Project without the
approval of the City.
7. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence in
the performance of its services as is ordinarily exercised by members of the profession under
similar circumstances in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Consultant shall be liable to the fullest
extent permitted under applicable law, without limitation, for any injuries, loss, or damages
proximately caused by Consultant's breach of this standard of care. Consultant shall put forth
reasonable efforts to complete its duties in a timely manner. Consultant shall not be
responsible for delays caused by factors beyond its control or that could not be reasonably
foreseen at the time of execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall be responsible for
costs, delays or damages arising from unreasonable delays in the performance of its duties.
8. Audit Disclosure. Any reports, information, data, etc. given to, or prepared or assembled by
the Consultant under this Agreement which the City requests to be kept confidential, shall not
be made available to any individual or organization without the City's prior written approval.
The books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Consultant or
other parties relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the City and either the
Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor for a period of six (6) years after the effective date of
this Contract. The Consultant shall at all times abide by Minn. Stat. 13.01 et seq.; the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, to the extent the Act is applicable to data and
documents in the possession of the Consultant.
9. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party by seven (7) days written
notice delivered to the other party at the address written above. Upon termination under this
provision, if there is no fault of the Consultant, the Consultant shall be paid for services
rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the
City terminates the Agreement because the Consultant has failed to perform in accordance
with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Consultant, and the City may
retain another consultant to undertake or complete the work identified in Paragraph 1.
10. Subcontractor. The Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under
this Agreement except as noted in the Scope of Work, without the express written consent of
the City. The Consultant shall pay any subcontractor involved in the performance of this
Agreement within the ten (10) days of the Consultant's receipt of payment by the City for
undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Consultant fails within that time to
pay the subcontractor any undisputed amount for which the Consultant has received payment
by the City, the Consultant shall pay interest to the subcontractor on the unpaid amount at the
rate of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month. The minimum monthly interest penalty
payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid balance of less than
$100, the Consultant shall pay the actual interest penalty due to the subcontractor. A
subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Consultant
shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing
the action.
3
Rev. 3-29-12
11. Independent Consultant. At all times and for all purposes herein, the Consultant is an
independent contractor and not an employee of the City. No statement herein shall be
construed so as to find the Consultant an employee of the City.
12. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not
discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color,
creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance,
disability, sexual orientation or age. The Consultant shall post in places available to
employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this non-
discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for
employment. The Consultant shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph
in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such
work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. The Consultant
further agrees to comply with all aspects of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota
Statutes 363.01, et. seq., Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990.
13. Assignment. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein,
without the written consent of the other party.
14. Services Not Provided For. No claim for services furnished by the Consultant not
specifically provided for herein shall be honored by the City.
15. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion hereof is, for
any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such decision shall
not affect the remaining provisions of this Agreement.
16. Entire Agreement. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement
supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject
matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of
the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed
by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein.
17. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In providing services hereunder, the Consultant
shall abide by statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of
services to be provided. The Consultant and City, together with their respective agents and
employees, agree to abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Data Practices Act, Minnesota
Statutes Section 13, as amended, and Minnesota Rules promulgated pursuant to Chapter 13.
Any violation of statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the services to be
provided shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and entitle the City to
immediately terminate this Agreement.
18. Waiver. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not
affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement.
19. Indemnification. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, and
employees harmless from any liability, claims, damages, costs, judgments, or expenses,
including reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent attributable to a negligent or otherwise
wrongful act or omission (including without limitation professional errors or omissions) of the
Consultant, its agents, employees, or subcontractors in the performance of the services
4
Rev. 3-29-12
provided by this Agreement and against all losses by reason of the failure of said Consultant
fully to perform, in any respect, all obligations under this Agreement. Consultant further
agrees to indemnity the City for defense costs incurred in defending any claims, unless the
City is determined to be at fault.
20. Insurance.
A. General Liability. Prior to starting the Work, Consultant shall procure, maintain and
pay for such insurance as will protect against claims for bodily injury or death, or for
damage to property, including loss of use, which may arise out of operations by
Consultant or by any subcontractor or by anyone employed by any of them or by
anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. Such insurance shall include, but
not be limited to, minimum coverages and limits of liability specified in this Paragraph,
or required by law. The policy(ies) shall name the City as an additional insured for the
services provided under this Agreement and shall provide that the Consultant's
coverage shall be primary and noncontributory in the event of a loss.
B. Consultant shall procure and maintain the following minimum insurance coverages and
limits of liability on this Project:
Worker's Compensation Statutory Limits
Employer's Liability $500,000 each accident
$500,000 disease policy limit
$500,000 disease each employee
Comprehensive General
Liability $1,500,000 property damage and bodily injury per
occurrence
$2,000,000 general aggregate
$2,000,000 Products —Completed Operations
Aggregate
$100,000 fire legal liability each occurrence
$5,000 medical expense
Comprehensive Automobile
Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit each accident(shall
include coverage for all owned, hired and non-owed
vehicles.
Umbrella or Excess Liability $1,000,000
C. The Comprehensive General/Commercial General Liability policy(ies) shall be
equivalent in coverage to ISO form CG 0001, and shall include the following:
a. Premises and Operations coverage with no explosions, collapse, or underground
damage exclusion (XCU).
b. Products and Completed Operations coverage. Consultant agrees to maintain
this coverage for a minimum of two (2) years following completion of its work.
Said coverage shall apply to bodily injury and property damage arising out of
the products-completed operations hazard.
5
Rev. 3-29-12
c. Personal injury with Employment Exclusion (if any) deleted.
d. Broad Form CG0001 0196 Contractual Liability coverage, or its equivalent.
e. Broad Form Property Damage coverage, including completed operations, or its
equivalent.
f. Additional Insured Endorsement(s), naming the "City of Eden Prairie" as an
Additional Insured, on ISO form CG 20 10 07 04 or such other endorsement
form as is approved by the City.
g. If the Work to be performed is on an attached community, there shall be no
exclusion for attached or condominium projects.
h. "Stop gap" coverage for work in those states where Workers' Compensation
insurance is provided through a state fund if Employer's liability coverage is not
available.
i. Severability of Insureds provision.
D. Professional Liability Insurance. The Consultant agrees to provide to the City a
certificate evidencing that they have in effect, with an insurance company in good
standing and authorized to do business in Minnesota, a professional liability insurance
policy. Said policy shall insure payment of damage for legal liability arising out of the
performance of professional services for the City. Said policy shall provide an
aggregate limit of$2,000,000. Said policy shall not name the City as an insured.
E. Consultant shall maintain in effect all insurance coverages required under this
Paragraph at Consultant's sole expense and with insurance companies licensed to do
business in the state in Minnesota and having a current A.M. Best rating of no less
than A-, unless specifically accepted by City in writing. In addition to the requirements
stated above, the following applies to the insurance policies required under this
Paragraph:
a. All policies, except the Professional Liability Insurance policy, shall be written
on an "occurrence" form ("claims made" and "modified occurrence" forms are
not acceptable);
b. All policies, except the Professional Liability Insurance policy, shall be apply on
a "per project" basis;
c. All policies, except the Professional Liability Insurance and Worker's
Compensation Policies, shall contain a waiver of subrogation naming "the City
of Eden Prairie";
d. All policies, except the Professional Liability Insurance and Worker's
Compensation Policies, shall name "the City of Eden Prairie" as an additional
insured;
e. All policies, except the Professional Liability Insurance and Worker's
Compensation Policies, shall insure the defense and indemnity obligations
assumed by Consultant under this Agreement; and
f. All polices shall contain a provision that coverages afforded there under shall
not be canceled or non-renewed, nor shall coverage limits be reduced by
endorsement, without thirty(30) days prior written notice to the City.
6
Rev. 3-29-12
A copy of the Consultant's Certificate of Insurance which evidences the
compliance with this Paragraph 20, must be filed with City prior to the start of
Consultant's Work. Upon request a copy of the Consultant's insurance declaration
page, Rider and/or Endorsement, as applicable shall be provided. Such documents
evidencing Insurance shall be in a form acceptable to City and shall provide
satisfactory evidence that Consultant has complied with all insurance requirements.
Renewal certificates shall be provided to City prior to the expiration date of any of the
required policies. City will not be obligated, however, to review such Certificate of
Insurance, declaration page, Rider, Endorsement or certificates or other evidence of
insurance, or to advise Consultant of any deficiencies in such documents and receipt
thereof shall not relieve Consultant from, nor be deemed a waiver of, City's right to
enforce the terms of Consultant's obligations hereunder. City reserves the right to
examine any policy provided for under this paragraph.
F. Effect of Consultant's Failure to Provide Insurance. If Consultant falls to provide the
specified insurance, then Consultant will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City,
the City's officials, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability and expense
(including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses of litigation) to the extent necessary
to afford the same protection as would have been provided by the specified insurance.
Except to the extent prohibited by law, this indemnity applies regardless of any strict
liability or negligence attributable to the City(including sole negligence)and regardless of
the extent to which the underlying occurrence (i.e., the event giving rise to a claim which
would have been covered by the specified insurance) is attributable to the negligent or
otherwise wrongful act or omission (including breach of contract) of Consultant, its
subcontractors, agents, employees or delegates. Consultant agrees that this indemnity
shall be construed and applied in favor of indemnification. Consultant also agrees that if
applicable law limits or precludes any aspect of this indemnity, then the indemnity will be
considered limited only to the extent necessary to comply with that applicable law. The
stated indemnity continues until all applicable statutes of limitation have run.
If a claim arises within the scope of the stated indemnity, the City may require Consultant
to:
a. Furnish and pay for a surety bond, satisfactory to the City, guaranteeing
performance of the indemnity obligation; or
b. Furnish a written acceptance of tender of defense and indemnity from
Consultant's insurance company.
Consultant will take the action required by the City within fifteen (15) days of receiving
notice from the City.
21. Ownership of Documents. All plans, diagrams, analyses, reports and information generated
in connection with the performance of the Agreement ("Information") shall become the
property of the City, but Consultant may retain copies of such documents as records of the
services provided. The City may use the Information for its purposes and the Consultant also
may use the Information for its purposes. Use of the Information for the purposes of the
project contemplated by this Agreement ("Project") does not relieve any liability on the part of
the Consultant, but any use of the Information by the City or the Consultant beyond the scope
of the Project is without liability to the other, and the party using the Information agrees to
defend and indemnify the other from any claims or liability resulting therefrom.
7
Rev. 3-29-12
22. Dispute Resolution/Mediation. Each dispute, claim or controversy arising from or related to
this Service Agreement or the relationships which result from this Agreement shall be subject
to mediation as a condition precedent to initiating arbitration or legal or equitable actions by
either party. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the mediation shall be in accordance with the
Commercial Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association then currently in
effect. A request for mediation shall be filed in writing with the American Arbitration
Association and the other party. No arbitration or legal or equitable action may be instituted
for a period of 90 days from the filing of the request for mediation unless a longer period of
time is provided by agreement of the parties. Cost of mediation shall be shared equally
between the parties. Mediation shall be held in the City of Eden Prairie unless another
location is mutually agreed upon by the parties. The parties shall memorialize any agreement
resulting from the mediation in a Mediated Settlement Agreement, which Agreement shall be
enforceable as a settlement in any court having jurisdiction thereof.
23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota.
24. Conflicts. No salaried officer or employee of the City and no member of the Board of the City
shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Contract. The violation of this provision
renders the Contract void. Any federal regulations and applicable state statutes shall not be
violated.
25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall
be considered an original.
26. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and
supersedes all prior communications, understandings and agreements relating to the subject
matter hereof, whether oral or written.
Executed as of the day and year first written above.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Mayor
City Manager
FIRM NAME
By:
Its: i /
8
SEH
EXHIBIT A
May 2,2012 RE: City of Eden Prairie
Lower Riley Creek Reach H2-H3
Stabilization Project
SEH No.P-EDENP 120302
Leslie A. Stovring
Environmental Coordinator
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie,MN 55344
Dear Ms. Stowing:
Building off our past experience working with the City on stream restoration and infrastructure projects,the
City can be confident that SEH team members have the necessary knowledge and experience to successfully
complete this project in an efficient,cost effective and overall successful manner. Our proposal includes a
brief background of the project,our approach,our proposed work plan,our project team and estimated fees.
We have also enclosed several examples of related work.
For this project we have assembled a team of highly qualified water resources,geotechnical and natural
resources professionals.Our team members have diverse experience,but at the same time specialize in key
areas including geomorphology and stream restoration,hydrology and hydraulics,erosion control and
sediment transport, soil mechanics,slope stability,plant ecology and aquatic biology.
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.(SEH®) is pleased to provide the City of Eden Prairie with our proposal for
professional engineering services for the erosion stabilization project along Riley Creek. SEH will provide a
solution that restores and provides stability to the eroded bank.
Background
The Riley Creek Erosion Stabilization project includes two t-l � , n ;_
critical areas of erosion along Riley Creek(Site H2 and H3). The
two sites are located within the Lower Valley of Riley Creek g:~
between River Station 190+00 and 194+00. Site H2 and H3 are
classified as High Priority erosion areas. At both sites,the bank
located along the easterly side of the channel is degrading. Based
on our field observations,the eroded bank at Site H2 is
approximately 15-20 feet high(see Figure 1)and at Site H3 is
15-25 feet in height(see Figure 2)and nearly vertical in both
instances. The erosion at these sites is caused by two
Figure 1-Site H2 Bank Erosion
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive,Suite 300,Minnetonka,MN 55343-9302
SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1952.912.2600 1800.734.6757 I 952.912 2601 fax
Leslie A. Stowing
May 2,2012
Page 2
fundamental factors: fluvial erosion;and steep slopes with limited vegetative cover causing instability on the
face of the bank. In addition, observed ground water seeps in the area lead to increased instability and
additional erosion on the channel banks.
The erosion sites are located within a heavily wooded reach of Riley Creek. In fact,the tree roots and limited
vegetated growth along the channel banks are potentially the only things preventing the erosion from being far
worse than it is today. The heavy canopy created by the dense trees and brush allows only a limited amount of
sunlight to pass through limiting the amount of vegetation that can be established along the channel leaving the
toe of the bank unprotected and highly susceptible to erosion. As a result,the natural forces in the channel
continue to degrade the toe of the bank,leading to the instability of the bank and the degraded state that
currently exists.
Based on our observations during a recent site visit,the
banks continue to degrade at a rapid rate. Rapid
degradation is evident when comparing the picture
provided by the City in the RFP showing a large Oak
tree at the top of the bank at Site H3,to our photograph
where the tree was toppled over across the channel(see
Figure 2). The toppled tree is also partially obstructing
high flows within the floodplain and would be removed
as part of the construction.
Figure 2-Site H3 Bank Erosion
Project Approach
The City proposes to abate the erosion problem and provide long term stability to the channel reach. Our
approach will focus on making alterations to the channel and bank that are resilient,self-maintaining,and
incorporate primarily natural elements that provide both aesthetic and environmental benefits as well as
minimize disturbance of the site and surrounding area during and after construction. This approach will utilize
natural elements found throughout the project area as much as possible and incorporate them into the design to
maintain the natural aesthetics of the area as well as provide cost savings for the project.
After walking the creek,we believe there are two primary alternatives to consider for stabilizing the channel
and the eroded banks. The first option includes stabilizing the toe of the bank along the channel and
reinforcing the slope. Techniques used for this alternative include utilizing coir rolls to provide toe protection
and installing a Vegetated Reinforced Soil Slope(VRSS)to stabilize the bank erosion. A conceptual
rendering of Site H3 has been included showing the integration of coir rolls and a VRSS. A VRSS combines
the mechanically stabilized earth systems of typical retaining wall construction with the principals of soil
bioengineering to create an environmentally responsible solution to slope instability. Overall,the VRSS walls
are very effective bank stabilization solutions that enable riparian areas to be reestablished. This alternative
also presents the least amount of disturbance to the natural habitat along Riley Creek. Potential construction
access points were identified during our site visit which will allow minimized overall disturbance to the sites.
Leslie A. Stowing
May 2,2012
Page 3
The second option includes realigning the channel to a central location with the floodway,allowing the eroded
bank to be stabilized through more traditional practices such as grading to reduce the overall slope of the bank.
The realigned channel would be located away from the eroded bank far enough to allow the slope to be graded
with limited potential for erosion. The channel would be stabilized using coir rolls,erosion control blanket
and other measures to ensure the newly constructed channel would be stable and unable to replicate the extent
of erosion that currently exists. Drawbacks to this alternative include a much larger overall disturbance to the
area. A newly constructed channel and slope grading create a large construction footprint within the sensitive
area.
It is anticipated that a vegetation management program will need to be implemented within the study area,
regardless of which alternative is selected. This critical step will remove excess trees and brush from the
project area and allow native vegetation to be established ensuring the long-term stability of the area. In
addition to the previously mentioned stabilization techniques and practices, grade-control measures may be
necessary for the channel depending on the findings during the preliminary analysis. The grade-control
techniques could potentially include measures such as rock vanes and log control structures to control the
velocities within the stream and focus the thalweg to the center of the channel, away from the stream banks.
Based on our site visit and initial observations,we believe the best solution for these sites is to implement a
VRSS,coir rolls and a vegetation management program. This approach will stabilize the erosion sites,
minimize the disturbance to the stream ecosystem and be the most cost effective. Our work plan has been
tailored based on this approach.We will however evaluate other options during the preliminary design phase to
determine their feasibility,provide a relative cost comparison and make a final recommendation thereafter.
We recognize the erosion sites are located adjacent to an existing development along the eastern extents of the
Riley Creek bank. In addition, a new development along the Riley Creek westerly bank is also being
proposed. These developments will be reviewed to determine if any potential impacts are associated based on
the preferred alternative.
Work Plan
We will provide the services to the City as outlined in the enclosed Task Hour Budget(THB)within the
project area for a not-to-exceed fee of$49,659. Our THB and its footnotes contain our key assumptions
regarding the scope of our work.
Our not-to-exceed fee includes reimbursable expenses.We will bill you monthly on an hourly basis for
our labor and reimbursable expenses.We will only proceed with additional work following your
authorization.
Work shall be done in accordance with the City's Standard Agreement for Professional Services
(Agreement).This proposal letter is an exhibit to that Agreement.
Project Schedule
We will be available to begin work as soon as a contract is approved. The schedule is based on late fall and
early winter construction in order to take advantage of drier conditions. We plan to have the Preliminary
Design Report completed by the end of June 2012,provided that we receive written authorization to proceed
by mid May 2012. Final design will commence in July 2012 with bid documents ready for advertisement in
Leslie A. Stovring
May 2,2012
Page 4
August 2012. Construction is anticipated to start in September 2012 with substantial completion by middle of
November 2012. Final restoration is anticipated to be completed in the Spring of 2013.
The Agreement,Exhibit A, and the THB represent the entire understanding between the City and us with
regards to the project.
We look forward to working with you,your staff and the City of Eden Prairie on this project. Thank you for
the opportunity to continue to work with the City of Eden Prairie. If you have any questions don't hesitate to
contact Carter Schulze at 952.912.2610 or Justin Klabo for any technical questions at 651.765.2933.
Sincerely,
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
Carter A. Schulze,PE
Project Manager
Enclosures
fi J
S EH Task Hour Budget
City of Eden Prairie
Lower Riley Creek Reach H2-H3 Stabilization Project
Design, Bidding and Construction Phase Services
May 2, 2012
ESTIMATED COST
PROJECT TASKS
1.0 Data Collection
1.1 Data Collection(1)
1.2 Project Team Kick off Meeting with City
Subtotal Hours.,
110
Subtotal Labor Cost ,
$ 42
2.p Preliminary Design
2.1 Project Charrette Meeting(12)
2.2 Channel Analysis(2)(4)(5)(16)
2.2.1 Stream Dynamic and Channel Sinuosity
2.2.2 Sediment Transport
2.2.3 Deposition Areas
2.2.4 Off-channel storage areas
2.2.5 Site Survey
2.4 Geotechnical Investigation(6)(7)(8)
2.5 Hydraulic Modeling(15)(18-20)
2.6 Wetland Delineation/Seep Identification/Report(13)
Subtotal,Hours 104 0
Subtotal La. or Cost 1,2
' b
Report.
3.1 Preliminary Report(10)(11)
Sbtota ��urs 32
Subtoal,Laior Cost, S3,48i
4.1 Construction Plans
4.1.1 Construction Details
4.1.2 Grading Plan
4.1.3 Restoration
4.1.4 Erosion control
Page 1 of 4
ESTIMATED COST
PROJECT TASKS
4.1.5 Cross Sections
4 1 6 City Plan Review Meeting
9$0
Subtota Labor Cost, $, 0,203 ,.
4.2 Project Manual(3)
4.2.1 Front end
4.2.2 Special Conditions
4.2.3 Proposal Form
4.2.4 Form of Contract
4.2.5 Performance Bond
4.2.6 Payment Bond
4.2.7 Soil Borings
4.2.8 Appendix
Subtotal Hourrs
150
Subtotal Labor Cost1,73
4.3 Opinion of Probable Cost
4.3.1 Quantity Calculations
Subtotal Hours 1� 0„.
Subtotal Lab:or Cost $:1,443r
4.4 Permits(14)
4.4.1 Agency coordination
4.4.2 Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District
4.4.3 WCA-Wetland Delineation and Final Technical Review
4.4.4 Dept.of Natural Resources
4.4.5 NPDES Permit and SWPPP
Subtotal Hours 2� 0
Subtotal Labor Cost., , ,320, , , ,
4.5 Bidding Assistance
4.5.1 Ad for Bids
4.5.2 Prepare Tabulation of Bids
4.5.3 Prepare and Send Bid Documents to Bidders
4.5.4 Respond to Bid Inquiries
4.5.5 Addendums
4 5 6 Bid Opening
Subtotal Hours
Subtotal tr*411(itEgPriaaIPEIPgigPISIPPIERM
60 ;
$693
5 onstruction tii stratiiou 4. , ,
5.1 Construction Administration and Observation(22)
5.2 Construction Staking
5.3 As-builts(21)
Igen Subtotal Hourrs 56.0
ginteSubtotal Labor Cost M,..,`,.,,. 1"" . ...S1b1910`.,,, "
Page 2 of 4
ESTIMATED COST
PROJECT COST SUMMARY
Subtotal Hours 455.0
Subtotal Labor Cost $48,523
Subtotal Expenses(9) $1,136
TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $49,659
P:\AE\E\Edenp\120302\1-genl\10-contracts\Proposal\[THB RilCrk Stab_H2H3_5.2.12 Council.xls]Hours-Cost
NOTES:
1 Background data includes past drainage studies, as-builts within study area, aerial photography, seep
location diagram and wetland delineation report for the proposed development(Hennepin Village Site B),
Environmental Assessment Worksheet(for Oak Park at Hennepin Village),wetland boundaries and NWI
information,2'contour mapping within project reach, floodplain topography, other utility information as
available,pervious/impervious cover areas within the subwatersheds and insurance information.This data
will be collected from various sources as necessary including; City of Eden Prairie,Riley-Purgatory-Bluff
Creek Watershed District,Hennepin County,FEMA,NRCS,Minnesota DNR and the University of
Minnesota.
2 Includes time for a two person survey crew to collect topographic survey including existing channel thalweg
profile, cross section survey of the erosion areas,channel geometry and geotagged photographs for a
minimum area of 5-10 meanders upstream and 3-5 meanders downstream of the study area.
3 The project manual will be developed in accordance with the City of Eden Prairie's standard construction
plans and specifications.
4 The geomorphic assessment will take into account all of the background data collection and all of the field
reconnaissance,topographic survey, geotechnical investigation,hydraulic analysis,wetland delineation and
seep identification.The channel analysis will include the evaluation of cross sections and channel bottom
profile to look at bankfull depth, bankfull width, width to depth ratio and slopes of the stable reference reach.
Additional information to collect includes sediment transport, deposition areas and off-channel storage areas.
5 Stream dynamic and sinuosity will be evaluated for 5-10 meanders upstream and 3-5 meanders downstream
of the study area.
6 SEH will conduct four soil borings by hand auger. A qualitative geotechnical analysis will be completed to
determine appropriate soil characteristics. The soil borings will extend to a depth of 7 feet or refusal.
7 Additional geotechnical investigation work may be necessary based on the preferred alternative. If
additional soil borings are necessary, SEH will prepare a scope of work for a drilling and testing firm to
complete the additional soil borings. The cost for any additional drilling and testing is not included within
this proposal. It is anticipated the drilling and testing firm will contract directly with the City for their
services.
8 SEH will stake borings in the field,coordinate drilling and testing,perform review of soil samples, and
assign laboratory testing for any additional soil borings.
9 Reimbursable expenses include printing, auto allowances, mileage, and survey equipment.
Page 3 of 4
10 Includes existing condition details, discussion of the need for the project, hydraulic modeling results, results
and analysis of soil borings, analysis of the causes of erosion,discussion of potential stabilization
alternatives, concept plans for the alternative(s) selected for correction of the problem, conceptual details for
stabilization and grade-control options(if selected), determination of the permitting requirements and
jurisdictional agencies, cost estimates for each alternative and potential funding outside of the City and/or
Watershed District.
11 Deliverable includes two hard copies, one digital(MS Word) copy on CD for review, Six(6)original bound
copies delivered to the City, and one pdf copy of the completed final study report emailed to the City.
12 A charrette meeting will be held on site with a member of each technical discipline to discuss the project and
formulate potential alternatives for the erosion issues. The Charrett meeting will be used to streamline the
design process by involving all technical areas within one coordinated approach, ensuring aspects of each
alternative are analyzed and accounted for.
13 The project area will be inspected for potential creek,wetland and seepage impacts. A Wetland Delineation
Report, including identification of all significant seeps within the project and will be the basis for
determining project alternative and wetland impact avoidance and minimization,will be provided to the
City. The report will be compatible with ArcView 9.3 and AutoCAD
14 Includes one coordination meeting will all agency stakeholders as well as adequate time for submittal to
agencies for review and comment and for making any plan changes based on their comments.
15 The RPBCWD XPSWMM model will be utilized to analyze existing and proposed conditions for the project
area. Additional detail will be incorporated into the model based on topographical information and any
additional survey obtained. SEH will utilize XPSWMM 2-dimensional capabilities to analyze varying flow
depths, velocities, shear stresses throughout the project area as well as possible temporary diversion
alternatives.
16 Sediment transport,deposition areas and off-channel storage areas will be identified by field inspection,
17 Not used
18 Hydrologic information including design flows, discharge and corresponding frequency information
(specifically for the 1.5-, 10-and 100-year events)will be obtained from the RPBCWD comprehensive
XPSWMM model. Bank full and discharge conditions will be determined.
19 The geometry will be based on the existing 2' contour mapping provided by the City and the new
topographic survey information previously collected.
20 The model will be a combination XPSWMM 1-dimensional/2-dimensional model. The 2-dimensional
component will be utilized along the study area to determine varying flow depths,velocities and shear stress
for the respective design storm events. The XPSWMM 1D/2D model allows disposition areas and off-
channel storage areas to be readily identified using XPSWMM to analyze the system dynamically.
Stabilization measures,the need for temporary diversion of the creek, and long-term impacts of the proposed
stabilization methods on the creek upstream and downstream of the study area will be evaluated.
21 Task includes time for preparation of as-built documents, including an as-built survey.
22 Inspection is based on an estimated six(6)week construction period for 2 hours per day of construction
observation.
Page 4 of 4
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Calendar May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: VIII.K.
Paul Sticha, Office of the City Rink 2 Roofing Project
Manager, Facilities
Requested Action
Move to: Award the contract to replace the Rink 2 roof at the Community Center to Peterson
Brothers Roofing& Construction.
Synopsis:
Base Bid Alternate G-1 Total
Peterson Brothers $405,000 $77,500 $482,500
John A. Dalsin& Sons $411,952 $71,453 $483,405
McPhillips Received Plans & Specs but did not submit a Bid
Total Budgeted $400,000
• The Rink 2 roof has exceeded its theoretical useful life and is beyond the point of economical
repair. Each year new leaks occur, costing thousands of dollars to repair the roof and to
repair the water damage inside the building.
• Additional insulation will be installed to improve the energy performance of the new roof.
• An ad for bids was placed in the Eden Prairie News on April 12.
• A pre-bid meeting was held on April 17.
• Bids were received May 3.
• McPhillips requested plans and specifications but then did not submit a bid.
• Staff recommends that the contract be awarded to Peterson Brothers for the Base Bid only, in
order to remain near the budgeted amount.
• The Team Room roof(Alternate G-1)will be budgeted for 2015 and done with the Pool roof.
Attachment
Recommendation letter by Environmental Process Inc. (EPI)
Environmental Process, Inc.
715 Florida Avenue South,Suite 111,Golden Valley,MN 55426-1700
Phone: 763-398-3040•Fax: 763-398-0121 •email: epimpls@go-epi.com•www.go-epi.com ept
May 4, 2012
Mr. Paul Sticha
Facilities Manager
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: City of Eden Prairie
Community Center
2012 Rink#2 Roof Replacement
EPI Project No. 12-315
Dear Mr. Sticha:
Environmental Process, Inc. (EPI) reviewed the City of Eden Prairie Community Center
— 2012 Rink #2 Roof Replacement project work scope with Mr. Rich Gannon with
Peterson Bros. Roofing and Construction, Inc. and there were no questions. Rich Gannon
indicated that they will be ready to start work per the tentative schedule. A detailed work
schedule will be discussed in the preconstruction meeting. The Project Superintendent
will be Al Schuna and the On-Site Foreman will be Chad Taylor.
Peterson Bros. Roofing and Construction, Inc. is based in St. Paul, Minnesota. EPI has
worked with Peterson Bros. Roofing and Construction, Inc. in the past. Peterson Bros.
Roofing and Construction, Inc. recently successfully completed the City of Eden Prairie
City Center — Garden Room / City Hall 2009 Roof Replacement project in which their
work was performed in a very professional manner.
Peterson Bros. Roofing and Construction, Inc. received a rating of twenty (20) points out
of a maximum of twenty (20) points as in the bidder's qualifications rating system per the
specifications. A minimum of twelve (12) points is required to qualify all bidders.
Based on the review of project work scope with Peterson Bros. Roofing and
Construction, Inc., review of qualifying project references, and the fact that they are the
low bidder and meet the requirements of contractor qualifications per the specifications
we recommend awarding the project to them. EPI recommends that the base bid cost of
$405,000.00 for the City of Eden Prairie Community Center - 2012 Rink #2 Roof
Replacement Project be accepted from Peterson Bros. Roofing and Construction, Inc.
Please contact us if you need any additional information.
City of Eden Prairie
Community Center—2012 Rink#2 Roof Replacement
EPI No. 12-315
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS, INC.
VA—s- e „0 4.,._...
Denny R. Langer, PE
Senior Engineer/Project Manager
Copy: Charles A. Lane, EPI
Michael Berreau, EPI
EPI File No. 12-315
Attachments: Recap of Bids
Contractor Qualification Points Summary and Tables
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
May 15, 2012
SECTION: Consent Calendar
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: VIII.L.
Cliff Cracauer 2012 Surplus Vehicles/Equipment
Public Works/Fleet Services
Requested Action
Move to: Approve disposal of surplus vehicles and equipment.
Synopsis
Fleet Services provides retirement of surplus property (equipment/vehicles). The equipment and vehicles are
auctioned in accordance with City Code 2.86 Subd. 3. Disposal of excess property.
The City of Eden Prairie has a contract Agreement with Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing for auction of
equipment&vehicles. Minneapolis Auto Auction has the current contract for vehicle auctions that meets our
code requirements. Fred W. Radde & Sons has the Hennepin County contract for equipment auctions and is in
compliance with City code.
Attachments
• 2012 Vehicle /Equipment Auction List
TO: Robert Ellis
FROM: Cliff Cracauer
DATE: May 2, 2012
SUBJECT: 2012 Auction Vehicles
As per our previous conversation, I am requesting authority to dispose of vehicles and equipment
on the attached list. All excess property listed to be sold at Public auction held at and run by
Minneapolis Auto Auction. The City will pay a set fee of$150/vehicle.
Unit Year Unit Serial Number Vehicle Make Vehicle Model
125 2002 1GCEC14W92Z311135 Chevrolet C1500
904 2002 2G1WF52E929296684 Chevrolet Impala
906 1998 1FAFP52U5WG137864 Ford Taurus
267 2007 3GNFK16377G264907 Chevrolet Suburban
129 2002 1GCHK24U42Z271938 Chevrolet CK2500
130 2002 1GCHK24UO2Z274075 Chevrolet CK2500
201 2006 2FAHP71W86X159844 Ford Crown Victoria _
202 2006 2FAHP71W66X159843 Ford Crown Victoria
204 2006 2B3LA43HX6H407400 Dodge Charger
209 2007 2B3KA43H57H843892 Dodge Charger
212 2007 2B3KA43H77H843893 Dodge Charger
215 2008 2B3KA43H58H299279 Dodge Charger
258 2005 2FAHP71W75X157176 Ford Crown Victoria
272 2005 1FAFP53U95A275830 Ford Taurus
273 2005 1FAFP53U95A285435 Ford Taurus
275 2006 1FTPW14V16FB09307 Ford F150
353 2004 1FMZU72K14ZB10085 _ Ford Explorer
376 1999 1GKGK26R4XJ770852 GMC Suburban
440 2002 1GCEC14W12Z307886 Chevrolet C1500
445 2003 1GTHK24G03E272930 Chevrolet 2500
446 2003 1GTHK24G03E272488 GMC 2500
457 1995 1FDZUOOL8SVA57350 Ford
512 2002 1GCEC14W02Z308592 Chevrolet C1500
718 1996 1FDZU90X4TVA27508 Ford L 9000
733 2001 1FDXF47S61EC67378 Ford F 350
739 203 1GTHK29G53E263245 Chevrolet 2500HD
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Ordinances and Resolutions May 12, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: VIII.M.
Community Development/ Oak Creek at Hennepin Village 6th Addition
Planning Rescinding Approvals
Janet Jeremiah/Michael
Franzen
Requested Action
Move to:
• Adopt a Resolution Rescinding Resolution 2007-94 which approved a Comprehensive Guide
Plan Change from Public Open Space to Medium Density Residential on 1.2 acres and from
Medium Density Residential to Public Open Space on 1.6 acres, approved by the City
Council on September 4, 2007; and
• Adopt a Resolution Rescinding Resolution 2007-95 which approved a Planned Unit
Development Concept Review on 73.8 acres, approved by the City Council on September 4,
2007; and
• Adopt the Resolution rescinding Resolution No. 2007-96 which approved the Preliminary
Plat of Oak Creek at Hennepin Village 6th Addition for 109 lots, approved by the City
Council on September 4, 2007.
Synopsis
Hennepin Village Limited Partnership is withdrawing the application for a 12 lot single family
subdivision.
Attachments
1. Resolution Rescinding the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change.
2. Resolution Rescinding the PUD Concept
3. Resolution Rescinding the Preliminary Plat
4. Letter from Hennepin Village Limited Partnership
5. Original Attachments
a. Resolution 2007-94 Comprehensive Guide Plan Change
b. Resolution 2007-95 Planned Unit Development Concept
c. Resolution No. 2007-96 Preliminary Plat
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 2007-94 WHICH APPROVED THE
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE FROM PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ON 1.2 ACRES AND FROM MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ON 1.6 ACRES
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Public Open Space to
Medium Density Residential on 1.2 acres and from Medium Density Residential to Public Open
Space on 1.6 acres was approved by City Council, Resolution No. 2007-94 on September 4,
2007; and
WHEREAS, the Property owner requests that the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change
from Public Open Space to Medium Density Residential on 1.2 acres and from Medium Density
Residential to Public Open Space on 1.6 acres be rescinded; and
WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on May 15, 2012.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY
COUNCIL:
Resolution 2007-94, approved by the City Council on September 4, 2007 is hereby
rescinded, thus restoring the Property to its status before the preliminary plat approval was
granted by the City.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 15th day of May, 2012.
Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk
OAK CREEK AT HENNEPIN VILLAGE 6TH ADDITION RESCINDING GUIDE PLAN
CHANGE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 2007-94 WHICH APPROVED THE
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE FROM PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ON 1.2 ACRES AND FROM MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ON 1.6 ACRES
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
WHEREAS,the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Public Open Space to Medium
Density Residential on 1.2 acres and from Medium Density Residential to Public Open Space on 1.6
acres was approved by City Council, Resolution No. 2007-94 on September 4, 2007;
WHEREAS,the Property owner requests that the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from
Public Open Space to Medium Density Residential on 1.2 acres and from Medium Density
Residential to Public Open Space on 1.6 acres be rescinded;
WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on May 15, 2012.
NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
Resolution 2007-94,approved by the City Council on September 4,2007 is hereby rescinded,
thus restoring the Property to its status before the preliminary plat approval was granted by the City.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 15th day of May, 2012.
Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 2007-95 WHICH APPROVED THE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF OAK CREEK AT HENNEPIN
VILLAGE 6TH ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
WHEREAS,the Planned Unit Development Concept of Oak Creek at Hennepin Village 6th
Addition for 109 single-family lots was approved by City Council Resolution No. 2007-95 on
September 4, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the Property owner requests that the Planned Unit Development Concept of
Oak Creek at Hennepin Village 6th Addition be rescinded; and
WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on May 15, 2012.
NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
Resolution No. 2007-95, approved by the City Council on September 4, 2007 is hereby
rescinded thus restoring the Property to its status before the Planned Unit Development Concept
approval was granted by the City.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 15th day of May, 2012.
Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 2007-96 WHICH APPROVED THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF OAK CREEK AT HENNEPIN VILLAGE 6TH ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
WHEREAS, the preliminary plat of Oak Creek at Hennepin Village 6th Addition for 109
single family lots was approved by City Council,Resolution No.2007-96 on September 4,2007;and
WHEREAS,the Property owner requests that the preliminary plat of Oak Creek at Hennepin
Village 6th Addition be rescinded; and
WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on May 15, 2012.
NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
Resolution 2007-96, approved by the City Council on September 4, 2007 is hereby
rescinded,thus restoring the Property to its status before the preliminary plat approval was granted
by the City.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 15th day of May, 2012.
Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk
The Pemtom Land Company
7697ANAGRAM DRIVE
EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55344
(952)937-0716 ^FAX(952) 937-8635
January 16, 2012
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie,MN 55344-4485
RE: Hennepin Village Site B—Toll Brothers 2012
Hennepin Village Limited Partnership hereby withdraws its application for Oak Creek at
Hennepin Village.
The withdrawal is subject to the City of Eden Prairie completing the review and approval
of all aspects of the Toll Brothers submission and the successful closing of the Property
between Hennepin Village and Toll Brothers. In the event the application is not
approved by the City or Toll Brothers does not close on Site B, we hereby respectively
request that the existing application for Oak Creek be reinstated.
Sincerely,
HENNEPIN VILLAGE LIMITED PARTERNSHIP
By The Pemtom Land Company
(()
Margaret C.Buell
Treasurer of The Pemtom Land Company
OAK CREEK AT HENNEPIN VILLAGE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-94
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the
Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and
WHEREAS,the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review
and comment; and
WHEREAS, the proposal of Oak Creek at Hennepin Village,by Hennepin
Village Limited Partnership is for 109 single family homes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby adopts the amendment of the Plan subject to
Metropolitan Council approval as follows:
Guide Plan Change from Public Open Space to Medium Density Residential on
1.2 acres and from Medium Density Residential to Public Open Space on 1.6
acres.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden rairie this 4th day of
September, 2007.
P Y ng, ayor
ATTEST:
geiO4)/Ae ' t-'
Kat een Porta, City Clerk
OAK CREEK AT HENNEPIN VILLAGE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-95
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT OF OAK CREEK AT HENNEPIN VILLAGE
FOR HENNEPIN VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned
Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on August 13,
2007, on Oak Creek at Hennepin Village by Hennepin Village Limited Partnership and
considered their request for approval of the PUD Concept plan and recommended approval of the
request to the City Council; and
WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on September 4, 2007.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. Oak Creek at Hennepin Village, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally
described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans
stamp dated September 4, 2007.
3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission
August 13, 2007.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 4th day of September,
2007.
it Young, Ma
ATTEST:
Kat een Porta, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
PUD Concept- (Oak Creek at Hennepin Village)
Legal Description:
Outlot A and Lot 3,Block 1,Spring Heights,according to eh recorded plat thereof,Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 116,
Range 22, Hennepin County Minnesota, lying northwesterly of the centerline of Hennepin
County State Aid Highway No 4. Excepting therefrom the following described tract:
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Northeast of the Southeast Quarter,thence on a
assumed bearing of South,along the east line thereof,a distance of 522.70 to the actual point of
beginning: thence continue South, along said east line, a distance of 383.94 feet; thence
North15 degrees 46 minutes 19 seconds West,a distance of 358.33 feet;thence Northeasterly of
the point of beginning.
Tracts A & B, Registered Land Survey No. 465, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 116,
Range 22,lying easterly of the centerline of Village Road(now Eden Prairie Road),northerly
of the Registered Land Survey No 465, and southerly of line described as commencing at the
southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter,a distance of 681.13 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be described ; thence westerly,deflecting to the left 87
degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds, a distance of 1316.94 feet,more or less,to the west line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and there terminating.
That part of the South 225 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section
29, Township 116,Range 22, lying westerly of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No.465.
The South 225 feet of the East 350 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast of Section 29,
Township 116, Range 22.
OAK CREEK AT HENNEPIN VILLAGE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-96
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF OAK CREEK AT HENNEPIN VILLAGE FOR HENNEPIN VILLAGE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Oak Creek at Hennepin Village for Hennepin Village Limited
Partnership stamp dated September 4, 2007, and consisting of 73.8 acres into 109 lots and six
outlots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the
provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is
herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of September, 2007.
P ung, ayor
ATTEST:
, .iti3,a -)ii4YL
Ka leen Porta, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: May 15, 2012
SECTION: Ordinances and Resolutions
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: VIII.N.
Community Development/ Rescinding Approvals for The Meadows
Planning 2012
Janet Jeremiah
Requested Action
Move to:
• Adopt the Resolution rescinding Resolution No. 2012 -77 which approved the
Preliminary Plat of The Meadows for 12 lots, approved by the City Council on May 1,
2012.
Synopsis
The Meadows LLC (JMS Custom Homes) is withdrawing the application for preliminary plat
and rezoning.
Background Information
The 120-Day Review Period Expires on July 12, 2012.
Attachments
1. Resolution Rescinding Resolution 2012-77
2. Withdrawal letter from JMS
3. Resolution 2012-77
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 2012-77 WHICH APPROVED THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE MEADOWS 2012
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
WHEREAS, the preliminary plat of The Meadows 2012 for 12 single family lot was
approved by City Council, Resolution No. 2012 -77 on May 1, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the Property owner requests that the preliminary plat of The Meadows 2012
be rescinded; and
WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on May 15, 2012.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY
COUNCIL:
Resolution 2012-77, approved by the City Council on May 1, 2012 is hereby rescinded,
thus restoring the Property to its status before the preliminary plat approval was granted by the
City.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of May, 2012.
Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk
marsh Cove, CCC
5250 West 74tn Street, Suite 8
Edina. MN 55439
Phone: 952-949-3634
Fax 952-949-3730
May 9,2012
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Rd
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Attn: Mike Franzen
Per your email to me on Monday morning, I am writing this letter to withdraw our current
application on the Rempfer property(12 single family lots including the existing home).
I plan to move forward with the revised preliminary plat, submitted last Friday, which combines
the Rempfer&Driver properties.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Bona
Marsh Cove, LLC
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-77
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF MEADOWS 2012 FOR MARSH COVE LLC (JMS CUSTOMS HOMES)
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Meadows 2012 for Marsh Cove LLC (JMS Custom Homes)stamp
dated May 1, 2012, and consisting of 5.03 acres into 12 lots, a copy of which is on file at the City
Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting
ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 15L day of May, 2012.
ancy ra-Lu ns, ayo
ATTEST:
P
Kat een Porta, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Public Hearings May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: IX.A.
Community Development/ Prairie Oaks Corporate Center
Planning
Janet Jeremiah/Regina Rojas
Requested Action
Move to:
• Close the Public Hearing; and
• Adopt the Resolution for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 8.4 acres; and
• Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review with
waivers, and Zoning District Amendment within the I-5 Zoning District on 8.4 acres; and
• Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Staff and
Commission recommendations and Council conditions.
Synopsis
The plan is to change the interior of the building from 75% to 90 % office and construct 48 new
parking spaces.
Background Information
The 1-5 zoning district allows up to 50% office. In 2000, the property was granted a waiver for
75% office use. The proposed waiver is from 75%to 90% office use.
From 1982 to present, the city has granted 15 variances/PUD waivers from city code to allow for
greater than 75% office use within an industrial zoning district.
The proposed plan meets parking requirements based on 90% office use.
The 120-Day Review Period Expires on July 25, 2012.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project at the April 23, 2012
meeting.
Attachments
1. Resolution
2. Staff Report
3. Location Map
4. Land Use Map
5. Zoning Map
6. Aerial photo
7. Planning Commission Minutes
PRAIRIE OAKS CORPORATE CENTER
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT OF PRAIRIE OAKS CORPORATE CENTER
FOR CSM CORPORATION
WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on April 23, 2012
on Prairie Oaks Corporate Center by CSM Corporation and considered their request for
approval of the PUD Concept plan and recommended approval of the request to the City
Council; and
WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on May 15, 2012.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. Prairie Oaks Corporate Center,being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally
described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans
stamp dated April 5, 2012.
3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission
April 23, 2012.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 15th day of May 2012.
Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
PUD Concept- Prairie Oaks Corporate Center
Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1 Research 2nd Addition
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Regina Rojas, Planner II
DATE: April 20, 2012
SUBJECT: Prairie Oaks Corporate Center
OWNER/ CSM Corporation
APPLICANT:
LOCATION: 6455 Flying Cloud Drive
120 DAY REVIEW: Expires July 25, 2012
• Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 8.4 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.4 acres.
• Zoning District Amendment within the I-5 Zoning District on 8.4
acres.
• Site Plan Review on 8.4 acres.
BACKGROUND
The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows the site as Industrial. Surrounding land uses are Office
and Industrial. The property is zoned I-5. Surrounding zoning is I-2, I-5 and Office.
The approved(2000)plan was an 83,000 square foot building.
SITE PLAN
The plan is to change the interior of the building from 75%to 90 % office and construct 48 new
parking spaces.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVER
The 1-5 zoning district allows up to 50% office. In 2000, the property was granted a waiver for
75% office use. The proposed waiver is from 75% to 90% office use.
From 1982 to present, the city has granted 15 variances/PUD waivers from city code to allow for
greater than 75% office use within an industrial zoning districts.
The proposed plan meets parking requirements based for 90% office use.
Staff Report—Prairie Oaks Corporate Center
April 20, 2012
Page 2
WETLANDS
There are exiting wetlands on the property that are located within conservation easements based on a
wetland delineation in 1999. A new wetland delineation shows a different configuration to the
existing wetland and a retaining wall in the existing conservation easement. The conservation
easement needs to be revised based on the current wetland delineation and exclude the existing
retaining wall.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
The Comprehensive Guide plan shows future improvements to both Flying Cloud Drive and the
Highway 212 / Shady Oak Road interchange. The city anticipates reconstruction of Flying Cloud
Drive adjacent to the property within the next five to ten years. This property will be assessed for
these improvements if the project is ordered. Based on a conceptual estimate, this property could
expect a special assessment of about$300,000. The city will forgo a Special Assessment Agreement
at this time but would encourage and recommend that the property owner petition for these
improvements.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of the following request:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 8.4 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.4 acres
• Zoning District Amendment within the I-5 Zoning District on 8.4 acres.
• Site Plan Review on 8.4 acres.
This is based on plans stamp dated April 5, 2012; the Staff Report dated April 20, 2012 and the
following conditions:
1. Planned Unit Development waiver is granted for increase in office use to 75%to 90%.
2. Receive watershed district and city approval of the wetland delineation/buffers/conservation
easements prior to grading permit issuance.
2
Area Location Map - Prairie Oaks Corporate Center
Address: 6455 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, MN
_, 0 n\
,s
-ti
os
T
62
_ Z212
62
169
Crosstown Circle Hying Cloud Drive
Ail ....
tr 4 ** .
ow
SITE
z
Z
/ 169
(4
GY3 , ',YO
AKRD Shady Oak Road
rr
il
allalkailli 0 3 0 741 1,481 Feet
I i I ` i i I
1
I W 69TH;T
Guide Plan Map
Prairie Oaks Corporate Center
6455 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, MN
// /
Crosstown Circle Flying Cloud Drivel
7 PP"
, _,_ pli J1
At!
Shady Oak Road
ii
tip- - - ._, , , \ \ \ Ili
I ,
,. .
ity of Eden " rairi : La ' • - uide
Pa ► i . p ' ,00-20 ' 0 \ I
7
Legend
Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre Neighborhood Commercial Streams N
Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre - Community Commercial Principal Arterial
1772 Low Density/Public/Open Space - Regional Commercial —A Minor Arterial
B Minor Arterial ' ' + 'l
Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre®Town Center DATE Approved 03-19-03 DATE Revised 12-06-06
Major Collector DATE Revised 01-07-05 DATE Revised 03-01-07 EDEN
n Medium Density Residential/Office - Park/Open Space DATE Revised 11-07-05 DATE Revised 06-01-07
Minor Collector DATE Revised 02-23-06 DATE Revised 10-01-07
- High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre W Public/Quasi-Public DATE Revised 03-23-06 DATE Revised 03-01-08
DATE Revised 06-23-06 DATE Revised 03-01-09
_Airport Golf Course PRAIRIE
Office - Church/Cemetary
V/A, Office/Industrial Open Water EL:m.... .o— ®�..a„ . .a.®u®Y„ 1e,0® iiVE•wOx[•pAEAM
r7j Office/Public/Open Space =Right-Of-Way 0.125 0
- Industrial I I
Miles
Zoning Map
Prairie Oaks Corporate Center
6455 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie MN
7/ 7.------„_ / \
Crosstown Circle c
Flying Cloud Drive \/ I
rill!" .
I
/ •,f4/ pp!' -\\.1
--.. \
I\-4, I
' I.
‘,.../
Shady Oak Road
C:\_\
• / .----1
City of Eden ` airie Zoning Map7/
Rural -Regional Commercial Shoreland Management Classifications N
R1-44 One Family-44,000 sf.min. I-1 TC-C I NE I Natural Environment Waters
R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min. n TC-R I RD I Recreational Development Waters
R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min. an TC-MU I GD I General Development Waters(Creeks Only) t . I
R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min. Industrial Park-2 Acre Min, ® 100- Year Floodplain
RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A.max. a7 Industrial Park- 5 Acre Min. EDEN
Up dated through approved Ordinances#26-2008
-RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A.max. General Industrial-5 Acre Min.
Ordinance#33-2001(BFI Addition)approved,but not shown on this map edition PRAIRIE
Office J Public Date:March 1,2009
Neighborhood Commercial I Golf Course In case ofdiscrepencyreatedtoazoningclassitmaeononthiszoningmap,theOrdinance e•wo.=.r.DREAM
and attached legal description on file at Eden Paine Ciry Center will prevail.
-Community Commercial Water
-Highway Commercial Right of Way 0 0.125 0.25
-Regional Service Commercial
,op....,��mo..,...,ti4..
Miles -6- o..o.a., ..._..1..m ,..,,m„
Aerial Map
Prairie Oaks Corporate Center
6455 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, MN
�.. • r .
PIIPP'.. r Crosstown Circle • • . °
Flying Cloud Drive
.e
•
414 . , .,
0 .. ,.. ., .:
101. • :.,,:;,,,. : ., 4 _
*::.',101,..t,4,$4 .,..: ... . • . : ,
OP '
;�'~ SITE .
44,44, ,,,,,,J) . 1 I. '-' -.4. .•4:44414
..::::
II
4, _ - =r a�ryur�ay ,,., y
,R' _ qM►f� i^NWT.:.:A + -
i _ - - .max• '�-_- -_ • _
,....;:
�. - jti . 1 •
! rt
Shady Oak Road.r.'")\ ..
• Yf • ', .
'.:1 N
2
V
• . Ii11104.. :• . ,
....,..,. .m.,
-
- 111 - •i .,r„: lOilliffr
- - -
F• y
Fh _� �. FY it if
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY,APRIL 23, 2012 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER
Council Chambers
8080 Mitchell Road
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Steve Frank, Matt Fyten, John Kirk, Katie Lechelt,
Jacob Lee, Jerry Pitzrick, Kevin Schultz, Jon Stoltz,
Travis Wuttke
STAFF MEMBERS: Regina Rojas, City Planner
Rod Rue, City Engineer
Stu Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
Julie Krull, Recording Secretary
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE—ROLL CALL
Vice Chair Fyten called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Kirk and Stoltz were absent.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION by Schultz, seconded by Wuttke, to approve the agenda. Motion carried 7-0.
III. MINUTES
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON APRIL 9, 2012
MOTION by Wuttke, seconded by Schultz, to approve the minutes. Motion
carried 5-0. Lechelt and Lee abstained.
IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS
V. PUBLIC MEETINGS
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PRAIRIE OAKS CORPORATE CENTER by CSM Corporation
Location: 6455 Flying Cloud Drive
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 8.4 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.4 acres
• Zoning District Amendment in the I-5 Zoning District on 8.4 acres
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
April 23, 2012
Page 2
• Site Plan Review on 8.4 acres
John Ferrier, representing CSM Corporation, who is the owner and applicant of
the building, presented the proposal. He stated their new potential tenant,
Starkey, would like to occupy the building and because of that they need to
change the interior of the building from 75% to 90% office. He stated they would
also be paving an area on site to supply more parking spaces. Starkey is a
business located in Eden Prairie with their main office building close to this
location. Mr. Ferrier said they would like to have them as a tenant and agree with
the staff report.
Vice Chair Fyten asked Rojas to review the staff report. Rojas stated staff
recommends approval based on the conditions on page 2 of the staff report.
Vice Chair Fyten opened the meeting up for public input. There was no input.
MOTION by Pitzrick, seconded by Wuttke, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried 7-0.
MOTION by Pitzrick, seconded by Schultz,to recommend approval of the
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 8.4 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review with waivers 8.4 acres, Zoning District Amendment
in the I-5 Zoning District on 8.4 acres, and Site Plan Review on 8.4 acres based
on plans stamped dated April 5, 2012 and the staff report dated April 20. Motion
carried 7-0.
VII. PLANNERS' REPORT
Rojas asked the Planning Commission members who have not RSVP'd for the Board and
Commissions Banquet on May 9th, to please do so by May 2nd
Rojas stated there will be one item, possibly two, on the agenda for the May 14, 2012
Planning Commission Meeting. There will be no meeting on May 28, in observance of
Memorial Day. The next meeting after that will be June 11, 2012.
VII. MEMBERS' REPORT
IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION by Kirk, seconded by Schultz, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried
7-0.
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
April 23, 2012
Page 3
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:08 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE:
SECTION: Payment of Claims May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: X.
Sue Kotchevar, Office of the Payment of Claims
City Manager/Finance
Requested Action
Move to: Approve the Payment of Claims as submitted (roll call vote)
Synopsis
Checks 218152—218490
Wire Transfers 1000702 - 1000789
Wire Transfers 4455 4469
Purchasing Card 4466
April 20th payment
City of Eden Prairie
Council Check Summary
5/15/2012
Division Amount Division Amount
General 62,688 601 Prairie Village Liquor 111,842
100 City Manager 1,044 602 Den Road Liquor 139,473
101 Legislative 896 603 Prairie View Liquor 90,652
102 Legal Counsel 40,013 605 Den Road Building 868
110 City Clerk 980 701 Water Fund 67,638
111 Customer Service 4,569 702 Sewer Fund 321,034
112 Human Resources 180 703 Storm Drainage Fund 22,127
113 Communications 7,478 Total Enterprise Funds 753,633
114 Benefits&Training 38,582
130 Assessing 48 803 Escrow Fund 1,694
131 Finance 425 806 SAC Agency Fund 42,570
132 Housing and Community Services 13,750 807 Benefits Fund 629,682
133 Planning 1,115 809 Investment Fund 6,556
136 Public Safety Communications 5 811 Property Insurance 1,410
137 Economic Development 229 812 Fleet Internal Service 153,784
138 Community Development Admin. 323 813 IT Internal Service 30,746
151 Park Maintenance 16,465 815 Facilities Operating ISF 36,344
152 Parks Capital Outlay 2,654 816 Facilities City Center ISF 48,853
153 Organized Athletics 13,347 817 Facilities Comm.Center ISF 64,694
154 Community Center 13,128 Total Internal Service Funds 1,016,332
156 Youth Programs 102
158 Senior Center 1,858
159 Recreation Administration 1,382 Report Totals 2,139,539
160 Therapeutic Recreation 95
161 Oak Point Pool 90
162 Arts 7,809
163 Outdoor Center 1,692
166 CC-Therapeutic Recreation 90
167 CC-Youth Programs 1,846
168 Arts Center 1,278
169 SC-Therapeutic Recreation 63
180 Police 11,883
183 Emergency Preparedness 67
184 Fire 56,619
186 Inspections 609
200 Engineering 620
201 Street Maintenance 7,408
Total General Funds 311,427
301 CDBG 36,581
303 Cemetery Operation 550
304 Senior Board 112
308 E-911 794
309 DWI Forfeiture 182
Total Special Revenue Funds 38,219
444 Shady Oak Rd-CR 61 South 1,950
Total Debt Service Funds 1,950
502 Park Development 2,700
509 CIP Fund 7,318
512 CIP Trails 1,575
522 Improvement Projects 2006 6,385
Total Capital Project Funds 17,979
City of Eden Prairie
Council Check Register
5/15/2012
Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation
218266 314,449 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME MCES User Fee Sewer Utility-General Monthly MCES Fee
218345 278,577 HEALTHPARTNERS Medical/Dental Premiums Health and Benefits May Health/Dental Premium
4458 187,216 CERIDIAN State Taxes Withheld Health and Benefits Taxes Withheld
4456 128,976 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA Health and Benefits PERA
218365 103,399 BOYER TRUCKS Autos Park and Recreation Tree Loader Chassis
4455 46,544 US BANK Interest Fire
4466 46,036 US BANK Purchasing Cards Various
218423 42,144 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Due to Other Governments SAC Agency Fund
218244 36,414 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218432 33,972 MINNESOTA UI FUND Unemployment Compensation Organizational Services
218341 29,894 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
1000723 27,767 GREGERSON ROSOW JOHNSON&NILA Legal Legal Council
218407 27,158 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Transportation Den Road Liquor Store
1000789 24,378 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC Motor Fuels Fleet Operating
4460 23,771 ING Deferred Compensation General Fund
1000730 23,402 LOGIS Network Support IT Operating
218313 23,331 SOUTHERN WINE&SPIRITS OF MN Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
1000715 22,665 DIVERSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE Janitor Service Senior Center
1000788 21,736 WALL TRENDS INC Contract Svcs-General Bldg Fire Station#3
1000758 21,016 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC Design&Engineering Storm Drainage
218160 19,572 ABM JANITORIALSERVICES-NORTH C Janitor Service City Hall-CAM
1000751 19,506 THORPE DISTRIBUTING Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store
1000709 19,212 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN Gas Water Treatment Plant
4459 16,825 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Deferred Compensation General Fund
218342 16,617 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store
218296 16,297 PRAIRIE PARTNERS SIX LLP Building Rental Prairie Village Liquor Store
218484 16,170 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218347 15,350 ARTISAN PLUMBING&REMODELING Other Contracted Services Rehab
218310 15,322 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAI Other Contracted Services Public Safety Training Facilit
218411 15,265 LANDMARK REMODELING LLC Other Contracted Services Rehab
218240 14,567 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESO Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
1000707 14,108 BRAUER& ASSOCIATES LTD Improvements to Land Capital Impr/Maint Fixed
4462 14,097 CERIDIAN State Taxes Withheld Health and Benefits
218292 14,027 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218180 13,325 BONNER&BORHART LLP Legal Legal Criminal Prosecution
4465 13,165 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS,INC HRA Health and Benefits
218275 12,666 MOELTER GRAIN INC Lime Residual Removal Water Treatment Plant
1000785 12,652 THORPE DISTRIBUTING Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store
218485 11,839 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store
218265 10,879 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
218463 9,354 SOUTHERN WINE&SPIRITS OF MN Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
1000713 8,864 DAY DISTRIBUTING Misc Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store
218444 8,741 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Transportation Den Road Liquor Store
1000767 7,818 DAY DISTRIBUTING Misc Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store
218225 7,591 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON Design&Engineering Improvement Projects 2006
1000781 7,500 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES Other Contracted Services Housing and Community Service
218401 7,350 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESO Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation
218339 6,900 WINE MERCHANTS INC Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218391 6,690 GRAYMONT Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant
218280 6,556 NORTHSHORE ADVISORS LLC Interest Investment Fund
1000726 6,554 HAWKINS INC Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant
218461 6,250 SOUTHDALE YMCA YOUTH DEVELOPME Other Contracted Services Housing and Community Service
218302 6,000 RIGHTLINE DESIGN LLC Other Contracted Services Communications
218360 5,889 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY Tires Fleet Operating
1000780 5,878 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN Repair&Maint-Ice Rink Ice Arena Maintenance
218257 5,000 LUEDTKE,ALLISON Other Contracted Services Arts
218314 4,691 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING- Legal Notices Publishing City Clerk
218325 4,404 TECH SALES CO Capital Under$10,000 Water Storage
1000787 4,271 VINOCOPIA Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218252 4,192 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR LLC Contract Svcs-General Bldg Public Works/Parks
218188 4,160 CIVIC SYSTEMS LLC Other Contracted Services IT Operating
218455 3,988 RIVERS EDGE CONCRETE Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance
1000705 3,985 BELLBOY CORPORATION Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218184 3,984 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance
1000702 3,964 A-SCAPE INC Contract Svcs-Lawn Maint. Fire Station#3
218442 3,729 PAUSTIS&SONS COMPANY Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218349 3,686 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE Disability Ins Employers Health and Benefits
218482 3,657 WINE MERCHANTS INC Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store
1000722 3,591 GREENSIDE INC Contract Svcs-Lawn Maint. Fire Station#1
1000710 3,328 CERIDIAN Ceridian IT Operating
218220 3,285 GRAYMONT Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant
218210 3,140 FLOOR CENTER Other Contracted Services Rehab
218353 3,124 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE Capital Under$10,000 FF&E-Furn,Fixtures&Equip.
218388 3,122 GARDEN ROOM FRATELLI'S GARDEN Contract Svcs-Garden Romm Wine Club
218464 3,121 SPECIALTY TURF&AG INC Chemicals Park Maintenance
1000737 3,061 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC Machinery&Equipment Police
218163 3,017 ADVANCED ENGINEERING&ENVIRON Process Control Services Process Control
218395 3,011 HOHENSTEINS INC Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store
218481 2,902 WINE COMPANY,THE Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218446 2,872 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN Machinery&Equipment Capital Outlay Parks
1000760 2,777 BELLBOY CORPORATION Misc Non-Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store
218182 2,700 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Other Contracted Services Park Acquisition&Development
218327 2,688 TITAN ENERGY SYSTEMS Contract Svcs-HVAC Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr
218413 2,688 LAVAN FLOOR COVERING Capital Under$10,000 FF&E-Furn,Fixtures&Equip.
218279 2,675 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION Contract Svcs-Electrical Park Shelters
218264 2,649 MENARDS Building Materials Street Maintenance
1000769 2,396 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218289 2,347 PAUSTIS&SONS COMPANY Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
1000786 2,342 VAN PAPER COMPANY Cleaning Supplies Senior Center
218326 2,325 TEMPCO SYSTEMS Contract Svcs-HVAC 3rd Sheet of Ice
1000741 2,270 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY Contract Svcs-Electrical Garden Room Repairs
218232 2,041 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Tuition Reimbursement/School Fire
218315 1,950 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Design&Engineering Shady Oak Rd-CR 61 South
218338 1,949 WINE COMPANY,THE Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218471 1,933 TITAN ENERGY SYSTEMS Contract Svcs-Fire/Life/Safe Police City Center
4463 1,889 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS,INC Other Contracted Services Health and Benefits
4469 1,881 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS,INC Other Contracted Services Health and Benefits
218392 1,839 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance
Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation
218399 1,824 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI Union Dues Withheld General Fund
1000711 1,723 COMPAR INC I.T.User Charge Recreation Admin
218186 1,710 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO Software Maintenance IT Operating
218222 1,700 GYM WORKS Equipment Repair&Maint Fitness Center
1000768 1,673 FASTENAL COMPANY Clothing&Uniforms Sewer System Maintenance
218431 1,656 MINNESOTA PRINT MANAGEMENT LLC Office Supplies Customer Service
218316 1,645 ST PAUL,CITY OF Patching Asphalt Street Maintenance
218258 1,622 MAACO Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating
218261 1,550 MARTIN-MCALLISTER Employment Support Test Organizational Services
218324 1,508 SURLY BREWING CO Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store
1000784 1,501 STATE SUPPLY COMPANY Supplies-Plumbing Fire Station#1
218328 1,500 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES Other Contracted Services Water Capital
1000732 1,425 LYNDALE PLANT SERVICES Contract Svcs-Garden Rm/Caf. City Hall-CAM
218319 1,425 STAR TRIBUNE MEDIA COMPANY LLC Employment Advertising Organizational Services
218489 1,410 XCEL ENERGY Insurance Property Insurance
218403 1,390 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES/LESCO Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance
1000703 1,389 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY Office Supplies Customer Service
218281 1,381 NORTHSTAR MUDJACKING SPECIALIS Mudjacking Curbs Drainage
218172 1,380 BEACON ATHLETICS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
218267 1,356 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM Misc Non-Taxable Den Road Liquor Store
218332 1,351 US HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL GRP MN Health&Fitness Fire
218344 1,337 XCEL ENERGY Electric Prairie Village Liquor Store
218247 1,329 KEEPERS Clothing&Uniforms Police
218228 1,300 HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEF ASS Training Supplies Fire
218256 1,282 LOCKER GUY,THE Operating Supplies Water Treatment Plant
218284 1,235 OLSEN'S EMBROIDERY/COMPANY Safety Supplies Fleet Operating
218218 1,212 GRAND PERE WINES INC Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218417 1,164 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
1000765 1,137 CHEMSEARCH Supplies-HVAC City Hall-CAM
218355 1,090 AMERICAN RED CROSS Licenses,Permits,Fees Oak Point Lessons
218336 1,050 WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NA Paying Agent Water Capital
1000755 1,038 VAN PAPER COMPANY Cleaning Supplies City Hall-CAM
218165 1,031 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE Capital Under$10,000 FF&E-Furn,Fixtures&Equip.
218230 1,019 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Board of Prisoner Police
218311 1,000 SOUTHDALE YMCA-CHILD CARE Refunds CDBG-Public Service
218329 1,000 TRIPLE STAR REHAB Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance
218322 991 STREICHERS Clothing&Uniforms Police
1000747 981 SCHARBER&SONS Equipment Parts Park Maintenance
218171 976 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY Tires Fleet Operating
218337 950 WEST SIDE PLUMBING INC Building Repair&Maint. Water Treatment Plant
1000770 950 GRAINGER Supplies-Electrical Park Shelters
218330 943 TRUE FABRICATIONS Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store
218473 943 TRUE FABRICATIONS Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store
218204 922 E H RENNER&SONS Other Contracted Services Water Capital
218390 902 GRAPE BEGINNINGS Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
218375 896 COSTCO Merchandise for Resale Concessions
1000729 895 KIDS TEAM TENNIS LLC Instructor Service CC-Tennis
218422 884 MENARDS Building Materials Street Maintenance
218195 879 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT Supplies-HVAC Ice Arena Maintenance
218205 870 EDEN PRAIRIE FIREFIGHTER'S REL Union Dues Withheld General Fund
1000779 852 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC Machinery&Equipment Police
Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation
218367 832 CENTURYLINK Process Control Services Water Treatment Plant
218250 799 KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC Supplies-HVAC Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr
218169 750 ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING OFFICE Tuition Reimbursement/School Police
218424 750 MICHAELSON,ELIZABETH H Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert
218162 748 ACTIVE NETWORK INC,THE Operating Supplies Athletic Programs Admin
218193 746 COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP Refunds CDBG-Public Service
218309 729 SKY FOOD CATERING INC Supplies-Garden Room Garden Room Repairs
4457 704 CERIDIAN Garnishment Withheld General Fund
218269 696 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC Contract Svcs-Elevator Public Works/Parks
1000778 695 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Transportation Den Road Liquor Store
218217 688 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL OCS-Leak Detection Utility Operations-General
218270 685 MINNESOTA TROPHIES&GIFTS Operating Supplies Fire
1000725 684 HACH COMPANY Laboratory Chemicals Water Treatment Plant
218438 674 OENO'S DISTRIBUTION Wine Domestic Prairie Village Liquor Store
1000746 674 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN Repair&Maint-Ice Rink Ice Arena Maintenance
1000756 674 VINOCOPIA Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store
1000739 666 PETERSON BROS ROOFING AND CONS Contract Svcs-Roof Fire Station#1
218185 658 BUCK,NATHAN Other Contracted Services Volleyball
218418 650 MAECK,TOM Other Contracted Services Summer Theatre
218380 649 DOMACE VINO Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store
218480 646 WATER HEATERS ONLY LLC Supplies-HVAC Riley House
218234 646 HOHENSTEINS INC Beer Den Road Liquor Store
1000763 642 CANNON RIVER WINERY Wine Domestic Den Road Liquor Store
218448 640 PRINT SOURCE MINNESOTA Printing Police
218469 625 SURLY BREWING CO Beer Den Road Liquor Store
1000753 624 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC Operating Supplies Water Treatment Plant
218290 620 PETERBILT NORTH Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218378 616 DALE GREEN COMPANY,THE Improvement Contracts CIP Trails
218358 609 AZTECH EMBROIDERY SERVICES Clothing&Uniforms Inspections-Administration
218368 600 CENTURYLINK Maintenance Contracts E-911 Program
218441 600 PARLEY LAKE WINERY Wine Domestic Prairie View Liquor Store
218176 599 BIFFS INC Waste Disposal Park Maintenance
218386 588 FRAGALE,ANNETTE Instructor Service Senior Center Programs
218419 587 MATSON,TOM Software Fleet Operating
218433 572 MINNETONKA,CITY OF Other Contracted Services Community Center Admin
218157 570 SCOTT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Deposits Escrow
218173 565 BERNICK'S WINE Misc Non-Taxable Den Road Liquor Store
218318 563 STAPLES ADVANTAGE Office Supplies Customer Service
1000772 558 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Supplies-Pool Pool Maintenance
1000721 557 GRAINGER Supplies-Electrical Park Shelters
1000704 551 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC. Waste Disposal Public Works/Parks
218201 550 DH EXCAVATING Other Contracted Services Pleasant Hill Cemetery
1000720 540 GOVDELIVERY Software Maintenance IT Operating
218321 523 STOPTECH LTD Operating Supplies Police
1000716 496 DMX MUSIC Other Contracted Services Den Road Liquor Store
1000712 494 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Office Supplies Customer Service
1000766 492 COMPAR INC Other Hardware IT Operating
218288 492 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY Operating Supplies Fire
218453 486 RAY,LEE Other Contracted Services Softball
218263 485 MEADOW GREEN LAWNS INC Other Contracted Services Storm Drainage
218268 470 MINNESOTA CLAY CO.USA Operating Supplies Arts Center
Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation
218472 465 TKO WINES,INC Wine Imported Prairie Village Liquor Store
218206 464 EDEN PRAIRIE NOON ROTARY CLUB Dues&Subscriptions Police
1000775 458 LANDS END CORPORATE SALES Clothing&Uniforms Police
218260 450 MARCO INC Operating Supplies IT Telephone
218346 446 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Supplies-General Bldg City Hall-CAM
218486 445 WM MUELLER AND SONS INC Patching Asphalt Street Maintenance
218211 441 FLYING CLOUD T/S#U70 Waste Disposal Park Maintenance
218214 440 GE CAPITAL Other Rentals IT Operating
218238 440 IND SCHOOL DIST 272 Gym Rental Basketball
218396 432 HOUSTON,CHRISTOPHER W Instructor Service Ice Rink#1
218303 428 RIVERS EDGE CONCRETE Improvement Contracts Capital Maint.&Reinvestment
218246 420 KAISER,DAVID S Repair&Maint.Supplies Facilities Staff
218255 420 LIFT BRIDGE BREWERY Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store
218449 409 PROP United Way Withheld General Fund
218181 406 BOURGET IMPORTS Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store
218187 405 CENTURYLINK Telephone IT Telephone
1000738 402 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN Office Supplies Planning
218223 402 HALDEMANN HOMME INC Cleaning Supplies Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr
218152 400 CARVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. Deposits Escrow
218155 400 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEF OF POLIC Dues&Subscriptions Police
218300 400 REMARKABLE REPTILES,THE Operating Supplies Outdoor Center
1000724 395 GUNDERSON,CONSTANCE L. Instructor Service Arts Center
218366 394 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLIE Operating Supplies Water Treatment Plant
1000777 393 METROPOLITAN FORD Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218468 372 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218335 364 WAYTEK INC Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
1000727 351 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Supplies-Pool Pool Maintenance
218439 350 OLSON,JOCELYN Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert
218385 346 FORENSIC IMAGING,INC Operating Supplies Police
218374 339 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Storm Drainage
218215 333 GERTENS Chemicals Park Maintenance
218382 332 EARL F ANDERSEN INC Signs Traffic Signs
218235 329 HOLMES,TOM Other Contracted Services Volleyball
218301 320 RICK,ELIZABETH DEE Instructor Service Outdoor Center
218454 320 RICK,ELIZABETH DEE Instructor Service Outdoor Center
1000714 317 DELL Other Hardware IT Operating
218478 317 VINOANDES Transportation Den Road Liquor Store
218297 315 PREMIUM WATERS INC Supplies-General Bldg Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr
218199 308 DALE GREEN COMPANY,THE Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance
218370 307 CLAREYS INC Safety Supplies Sewer System Maintenance
218415 303 LIGHTNING PRINTING INC Operating Supplies City Council
218369 303 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store
218158 300 WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT ADMIN Deposits Escrow
218278 300 NEIDT,JEFF Deposits-P&R Refunds Community Center Admin
218376 300 CREATURE ENCOUNTERS INC Operating Supplies Outdoor Center
1000740 298 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
1000733 298 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Storm Drainage
218379 297 DELEGARD TOOL CO Small Tools Fleet Operating
218393 296 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER Training Supplies Police
218200 296 DELEGARD TOOL CO Small Tools Fleet Operating
218460 288 SHAMROCK GROUP,INC-ACE ICE Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store
Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation
1000735 288 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* Other Rentals IT Operating
218474 287 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Clothing&Uniforms Police
218398 286 IND SCHOOL DIST 272 Printing Recreation Admin
1000761 285 BOUNDLESS NETWORK Operating Supplies Ice Rink#1
218164 284 AERO DRAPERY AND BLIND Capital Under$10,000 FF&E-Furn,Fixtures&Equip.
218445 281 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store
1000717 280 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC Merchandise for Resale Concessions
218229 274 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS Software Maintenance IT Operating
218286 270 ONCE UPON A STAR Instructor Service CC-Preschool Events
1000742 270 PRINTERS SERVICE INC Repair&Maint-Ice Rink Ice Arena Maintenance
218364 269 BOURGET IMPORTS Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store
1000719 267 GOODWAY TECHNOLOGIES CORP Equipment Parts Water Treatment Plant
218306 252 SGC HORIZON LLC Dues&Subscriptions Water Capital
218248 250 KNOWLEDGE MARKETING,LLC Other Contracted Services Communications
1000744 248 PROSOURCE SUPPLY Cleaning Supplies Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr
218198 242 CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPANY INC. Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218426 238 MILIO'S SANDWICHES Merchandise for Resale Concessions
218459 231 SGC HORIZON LLC Legal Notices Publishing Street Maintenance
218208 229 FINANCE AND COMMERCE Dues&Subscriptions Economic Development
218475 222 UNITED WAY United Way Withheld General Fund
218372 221 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES United Way Withheld General Fund
218274 217 MN MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT INC Equipment Repair&Maint Park Maintenance
218373 217 CONCRETE CUTTING&CORING INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Storm Drainage
218425 215 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM Misc Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store
218237 215 HYDRO-VAC INC Equipment Repair&Maint Storm Drainage
218323 215 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
1000734 213 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL Contract Svcs-HVAC Den Road Liquor Store
1000752 210 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE&SUPPLY Misc Non-Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store
218276 200 MRPA Employment Advertising Organizational Services
218343 200 WRAGGE,KARI Refunds Environmental Education
218348 200 SIBLEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPART Deposits Escrow
218221 199 GS DIRECT Operating Supplies Engineering
1000708 197 CATCO PARTS SERVICE Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218293 190 POSTMASTER Postage Customer Service
218177 188 BIGGAR,JERRAD Travel Expense Police
218196 188 COX,KIM Travel Expense Fire
218216 188 GOOD,JAMIE Travel Expense Police
218224 188 HAMMERSCHMIDT,RICK Travel Expense Fire
218272 188 MITCHELL,SANDY Travel Expense Police
218159 186 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM Other Contracted Services Senior Center Programs
218231 182 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Software Maintenance IT Operating
218262 182 MATSON,TOM Small Tools Fleet Operating
1000773 182 INTOXIMETERS Miscellaneous DWI Forfeiture
4461 179 CERIDIAN Garnishment Withheld General Fund
218299 176 QUALITY PROPANE Motor Fuels Ice Arena Maintenance
1000718 172 FASTENAL COMPANY Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218465 170 STAPLES ADVANTAGE Office Supplies Customer Service
1000706 170 BOUNDLESS NETWORK Clothing&Uniforms Facilities Staff
218487 170 WORLD WIDE CELLARS INC Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store
218166 169 AMERIPRIDE LINEN&APPAREL SER Repair&Maint.Supplies Prairie View Liquor Store
218354 168 AMERICAN BOTTLING COMPANY,THE Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store
Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation
1000759 163 AMERICAN TIME&SIGNAL CO Supplies-General Bldg Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr
1000748 160 SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS INC Waste Disposal Fleet Operating
218412 160 LAND EQUIPMENT INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218400 158 J&R RADIATOR CORP Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218287 150 ORION SYSTEMS Other Contracted Services Police
218389 150 GOMELSKY,VLADIMIR Refunds Environmental Education
218202 147 DIRECTV Cable TV Community Center Admin
218168 147 ASPEN MILLS Protective Clothing Fire
218183 147 BROWNING,RYAN Travel Expense IT Operating
218245 147 KAEHLER,BILL Travel Expense IT Operating
218383 146 EXTREME BEVERAGE Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store
218320 145 STERLING FENCE INC Improvement Contracts Capital Maint.&Reinvestment
218434 145 MINNICH,JOHN Refunds Environmental Education
218387 143 FRONTIER PRECISION INC Equipment Repair&Maint IT Operating
218356 141 AMERIPRIDE LINEN&APPAREL SER Repair&Maint.Supplies Prairie View Liquor Store
218437 138 MUSSELL,KATELIN Other Contracted Services Volleyball
218361 134 BERTELSON TOTAL OFFICE SOLUTIO Office Supplies Utility Operations-General
218273 132 MN BOARD OF AELSLAGID Licenses&Taxes Engineering
218334 132 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218457 131 RUE,RODNEY Mileage&Parking Engineering
218178 129 BOBBY&STEVE'S AUTO WORLD EDE Equipment Repair&Maint Police
1000757 128 W P&R S MARS CO Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
1000728 125 JASON'S DELI Operating Supplies Police
4467 124 OPTUM HEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICE Other Contracted Services Health and Benefits
1000764 120 CERIDIAN Ceridian IT Operating
218490 120 EMERY-BOCK,JENNIFER R Events/Admission Fee Ice Show
1000776 117 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* Equipment Repair&Maint IT Operating
218467 115 STREICHERS Clothing&Uniforms Police
218197 115 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Training Supplies Police
218359 110 BANK BEER CO Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store
218251 107 LACROIX,MICHAEL Supply-Playing Cards Senior Board
218466 107 STERLING FENCE INC Improvement Contracts Capital Maint.&Reinvestment
218241 107 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES/LESCO Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance
218153 105 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE Licenses&Taxes Park Maintenance
218307 102 SHAMROCK GROUP,INC-ACE ICE Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store
218154 100 DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Other Rentals Park Maintenance
218212 100 FRASER,GORDON Refunds Environmental Education
218304 100 RUSSO,WENDI Refunds Environmental Education
218317 100 STANSBURY,ARLENE Refunds Environmental Education
218408 100 JOHNSON,MARGARET Refunds Environmental Education
218452 100 RAMSEY,DAWAYNE Refunds Environmental Education
218476 100 US HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL GRP MN Employment Support Test Organizational Services
1000736 100 METROPOLITAN FORD Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating
218282 99 O'BYRNE,ELLEN College Memberships Community Center Admin
218350 99 STATE OF MINNESOTA Licenses&Taxes Fleet Operating
218440 98 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY Operating Supplies Fire
218384 96 FALCK,TIMOTHY R Other Contracted Services Softball
218458 95 SEVENICH,WENDY Mileage&Parking Community Center Admin
218352 94 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM Other Contracted Services Senior Center Programs
218450 93 QUALITY PROPANE Motor Fuels Ice Arena Maintenance
4468 92 VANCO SERVICES Miscellaneous Community Center Admin
Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation
218219 90 GRAPE BEGINNINGS Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store
218227 89 HEFFERAN,CINDI Operating Supplies Day Care
218421 88 MEIERS,NICHOLAS J Instructor Service Outdoor Center
218436 87 MPX GROUP,THE Printing Police
1000774 83 JASON'S DELI Operating Supplies Police
218226 81 HARTZELL,PAUL Operating Supplies Staring Lake Concert
218161 81 ACME TOOLS Equipment Repair&Maint Senior Center Admin
1000745 81 QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER Other Contracted Services Communications
218213 80 FUSCO,PAUL J Instructor Service Outdoor Center
218362 77 BEST BUY Equipment Repair&Maint IT Operating
1000750 77 ST CROIX RECREATION CO INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance
218377 75 CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPANY INC. Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218294 75 POWERS,RICHARD Deposits-P&R Refunds Community Center Admin
218179 75 BOLD,PAULINE Instructor Service Outdoor Center
1000782 75 SHRED-IT USA INC Other Contracted Services Police
218203 73 DISPLAY SALES Supplies-General Bldg City Hall-CAM
218351 72 440400-NCPERS MINNESOTA PERA Health and Benefits
218381 68 DONALD SALVERDA&ASSOCIATES Conference Expense Community Development Admin.
1000749 66 SPRINT Telephone Engineering
218409 65 KOCHER,SUSAN Instructor Service Outdoor Center
218456 64 ROUFS,DANIEL Refunds Environmental Education
218271 64 MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218416 60 LUCID BREWING Beer Den Road Liquor Store
1000771 58 GUNDERSON,CONSTANCE L. Instructor Service Arts Center
218331 58 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Operating Supplies Police
218239 58 J H LARSON COMPANY Supplies-Electrical City Hall-CAM
218451 56 QUALLEY,ANN Deposits-P&R Refunds Community Center Admin
218428 54 MINNESOTA CLAY CO.USA Operating Supplies Arts Center
218295 53 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN Equipment Repair&Maint Park Maintenance
218427 52 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT Software Maintenance IT Operating
218371 51 COMCAST Dues&Subscriptions City Council
218233 50 HERDA,BEN Refunds Environmental Education
218305 50 SCHUH,JEFFREY Refunds Environmental Education
218394 50 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Operating Supplies-Escrow Planning
218397 50 HUNKER,LINNEA Refunds Environmental Education
218420 50 MCDONALD,PAUL Refunds Environmental Education
218430 50 MINNESOTA DEPT OF LABOR AND IN Licenses&Taxes Water Treatment Plant
218470 50 TAYLOR,EMILY Instructor Service Arts Center
218253 50 LANO EQUIPMENT INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218175 49 BERTHOLD,MAUREEN Refunds Environmental Education
218167 48 APPRAISAL INSTITUTE Dues&Subscriptions Assessing
1000783 47 ST CROIX RECREATION CO INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance
1000762 41 BOYER TRUCKS Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218402 41 JOE,ALLAN Refunds Environmental Education
218363 41 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS Supplies-General Bldg Park Shelters
218357 40 AT&T Other Contracted Services Police
1000731 39 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218259 38 MALANEY,MARY KATHERINE Deposits-P&R Refunds Community Center Admin
218488 37 XCEL ENERGY Electric Traffic Signals
218249 35 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Water Metering
218308 32 SHOLD,DAVE&GLENNA Deposits-P&R Refunds Community Center Admin
Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation
218410 31 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC Supplies-General Bldg Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr
218207 31 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance
218191 30 COMCAST Cable TV Fire
1000743 29 PRIORITY COURIER EXPERTS Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating
4464 29 VANCO SERVICES Bank and Service Charges Sewer Utility-General
218298 29 PRENTICE,DIANNE Deposits-P&R Refunds Community Center Admin
218283 29 OLSEN COMPANIES Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218447 28 PRIME SOURCE ONE LLC Other Revenue General Fund
218170 24 AT&T MOBILITY Pager&Cell Phone Park Maintenance
218254 23 LASINKER,EDWARD Refunds Environmental Education
218429 23 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH Licenses&Taxes Water System Maintenance
218435 23 MIRAU,ANTHONY Program Fee Day Care
218414 20 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Office Supplies Customer Service
218236 20 HOOVERSON,ORIN M Building Permits General Fund
218277 17 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218285 14 OLSON,PAUL Other Revenue General Fund
218477 14 VANCE BROTHERS INC Patching Asphalt Street Maintenance
218189 13 COMCAST Operating Supplies Fire
218156 13 RICHFIELD,CITY OF Licenses&Taxes Fleet Operating
218479 12 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
218174 10 BERTELSON TOTAL OFFICE SOLUTIO Office Supplies Water Treatment Plant
218190 9 COMCAST Operating Supplies Fire
218192 9 COMCAST Operating Supplies Fire
218209 5 FISCHER,MARLENE Deposits-P&R Refunds Community Center Admin
218333 5 WALKER,MARTHA Deposits-P&R Refunds Community Center Admin
1000754 4 UPS Postage Water System Maintenance
2,139,539 Grand Total
City of Eden Prairie
Purchasing Card Payment Report
4/20/2012 Payment
Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit
54 US-Irrigation Tools MENARDS Small Tools Park Maintenance
24 US-Irrigation Tools MENARDS Small Tools Park Maintenance
574 US-H20 Sery Freeze kit Repair RIDGE TOOL COMPANY Equipment Repair&Maint Water System Maintenance
460 US-Concrete RIVERS EDGE CONCRETE Improvement Contracts Capital Maint.&Reinvestment
504 US-Concrete RIVERS EDGE CONCRETE Improvement Contracts Capital Maint.&Reinvestment
34 US-Water Tanks MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
67 US-WaterTanks HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
19 US-Water Tanks MENARDS Small Tools Park Maintenance
15 US-Safety Net MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
24 US-Ball Fields HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
976 US-Website Post-It Notes 4IMPRINT Printing Communications
551 US-Armrest LUND INDUSTRIES Machinery&Equipment Police
(21) US-Refund-Sr Ctr Supplies WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Senior Center Admin
886 US-Recognition Lunch SANTORINIS Miscellaneous Internal Events
4 US-SC Supplies DOLLAR TREE STORES,INC. Operating Supplies Senior Center Admin
9 US-St Patricks lunch PARTY CITY Special Event Fees Senior Center Programs
14 US-Woodshop supplies MENARDS Equipment Repair&Maint Senior Center Admin
432 US-St Patricks lunch ANNIE'S CAFE Special Event Fees Senior Center Programs
136 US-Home N Garden show MARKETPLACE EVENTS Special Event Fees Trips
25 US-St Patricks lunch CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Special Event Fees Senior Center Programs
17 US-St Patricks lunch CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Special Event Fees Senior Center Programs
5 US-Supplies EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER Operating Supplies Senior Board
23 US-Woodshop supplies MENARDS Equipment Repair&Maint Senior Center Admin
59 US-St Patricks lunch ANNIE'S CAFE Special Event Fees Senior Center Programs
5 US-Internal Events RAINBOW FOODS INC. Operating Supplies Internal Events
77 US-Gardening Class TONKADALE GREENHOUSE Operating Supplies Senior Center Programs
65 US-Gardening Class WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Senior Center Programs
18 US-Gardening Class DOLLAR TREE STORES,INC. Operating Supplies Senior Center Programs
4 US-Pot o Luck Award RAINBOW FOODS INC. Employee Award Internal Events
14 US-O-Rings/Parts POWER SYSTEMS Equipment Parts Water Treatment Plant
41 US-Parts BRAAS CO Equipment Parts Water Treatment Plant
43 US-Parts QUEST ENGINEERING INC Equipment Parts Water Treatment Plant
21 US-O-Rings DICHTOMATIC Equipment Parts Water Treatment Plant
13 US-Tennis Nets MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
129 US-Dinner GRANITE CITY FOOD&BREWERY Travel Expense Water System Maintenance
31 US-Breakfast PERKINS Travel Expense Water System Maintenance
260 US-Water School HOLIDAY INN Travel Expense Water System Maintenance
204 US-Water School HOLIDAY INN Travel Expense Water System Maintenance
204 US-Water School HOLIDAY INN Travel Expense Water System Maintenance
204 US-Water School HOLIDAY INN Travel Expense Water System Maintenance
144 US-Meeting GINA MARIAS INC Conference Expense Utility Operations-General
426 US-Shelving E-RACKONLINE.COM Office Supplies Utility Operations-General
125 US-Duster Refill BISSELL.COM Cleaning Supplies Utility Operations-General
562 US-Watermain Locator Repair METROTECH CORPORATION Equipment Repair&Maint Water System Maintenance
95 US-Repairs FEDEX Postage Water System Maintenance
109 US-Supplies CLEVELAND BOTTLE&SUPPLY CO Repair&Maint.Supplies Water Treatment Plant
892 US-Water Tanks INDELCO PLASTICS CORP Landscape Materials/Supp Reforestation
Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit
5 US-Stand By Crew Lunch FIVE GUYS Operating Supplies Fire
222 US-Supplies S&S WORLDWIDE Operating Supplies Birthday Parties
66 US-Supplies S&S WORLDWIDE Operating Supplies Day Care
72 US-Supplies S&S WORLDWIDE Operating Supplies Fit Kids Club
20 US-Tot Time Supplies PROSOURCE SUPPLY Operating Supplies Birthday Parties
59 US-Tot Time Supplies PROSOURCE SUPPLY Operating Supplies Gymnasium(CC)
118 US-Operational Supplies PALOS SPORTS INC Operating Supplies Birthday Parties
7 US-Birthday Party Supplies TARGET Operating Supplies Birthday Parties
1,148 US-Cutter MIDWEST PRODUCTS COMPANY Small Tools Fleet Operating
20 US-Supplies MENARDS Operating Supplies Street Maintenance
112 US-eConnect Test EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER Operating Supplies Community Center Admin
(112) US-eConnect Test EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER Operating Supplies Community Center Admin
19 US-Recertification ARC HENNEPIN-CARVER Licenses,Permits,Taxes Pool Lessons
6 US-Facilities Clocks UPS STORE,THE Repair&Maint.Supplies Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr
12 US-Facilities Clocks UPS STORE,THE Repair&Maint.Supplies Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr
12 US-Facilities Clocks UPS STORE,THE Repair&Maint.Supplies Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr
5,341 US-Pontoon boat A-1 MARINE Capital Under$10,000 Capital Maint.&Reinvestment
417 US-Airfare DELTA AIR Operating Supplies Fire
14 US-Lunch MILIO'S SANDWICHES Operating Supplies Fire
109 US-Lamination FEDEX Miscellaneous Planning
275 US-Dues AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN Dues&Subscriptions Planning
210 US-Dues AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN Dues&Subscriptions Planning
375 US-dues AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN Dues&Subscriptions Planning
(15) US-Unauthorized charge US BANK Deposits Escrow
(15) US-Unauthorized charge US BANK Deposits Escrow
15 US-Unauthorized charge US BANK Deposits Escrow
(15) US-Unauthorized charge US BANK Deposits Escrow
76 US-Booking Room Supplies AMAZON.COM Operating Supplies Police
73 US-Booking Room Supplies AMAZON.COM Operating Supplies Police
27 US-USB Thumb Drive MICRO CENTER AIR Miscellaneous IT Operating
360 US-License Renewal PARABEN CORPORATION Miscellaneous IT Operating
42 US-Irrigation/EPCC HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance
28 US-Submersible Pump Cord STA-RITE INDUSTRIES Equipment Repair&Maint Park Maintenance
50 US-Drinking Fountains,tools GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL.COM Small Tools Park Maintenance
19 US-Shop Supplies MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
490 US-Boiler Exam training SPRUNG TRAINING SYSTEM/SERVICE Conference Expense Utility Operations-General
249 US-Absorbant Pads NEW PIG CORPORATION Cleaning Supplies Utility Operations-General
11 US-Ballfield Signs MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
10 US-SWLRT Meeting BEAN GOOD CAFE Miscellaneous Community Development Admin.
9 US-Pics for Council Wkshop CVS PHARMACY Video&Photo Supplies Community Development Admin.
4 US-Parking for Meeting MPLSPARKING.COM Mileage&Parking Community Development Admin.
182 US-Laptop Truck Mounts LAPTOP TRAVEL Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
182 US-Laptop Truck Mounts LAPTOP TRAVEL Equipment Parts Fleet Operating
21 US-Parts PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN Building Repair&Maint. Park Maintenance
368 US-Power Pruner PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN Machinery&Equipment Capital Outlay Parks
30 US-Dept Meeting CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Miscellaneous Recreation Admin
93 US-Spring Recognition WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Internal Events
8 US-Spring Recognition DOLLAR TREE STORES,INC. Operating Supplies Internal Events
373 US-Easter Supplies ORIENTAL TRADING Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
32 US-Easter Supplies DOLLAR TREE STORES,INC. Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
4 US-Easter Supplies MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit
19 US-Easter Supplies TARGET Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
12 US-Bunny Supplies WALGREEN'S#5080 Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
68 US-Bunny Supplies ORIENTAL TRADING Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
48 US-Bunny Supplies TARGET Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
74 US-Bunny Supplies RHODE ISLAND NOVELTY Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
14 US-Bunny Supplies CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
69 US-Bunny Supplies PARTY CITY Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
29 US-Bunny Supplies DOLLAR TREE STORES,INC. Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
20 US-Bunny Supplies MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Special Events(CC)
31 US-Flowers HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Operating Supplies Community Center Admin
180 US-Membership-A Rose SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MAN Dues&Subscriptions Human Resources
7 US-Water Glasses TARGET Training Supplies Organizational Services
146 US-New Hire Gifts POSITIVE PROMOTIONS Employee Award Organizational Services
87 US-Safety Glasses SAFETY SMART GEAR Office Supplies Customer Service
10 US-Water Plant Supervisor NATIONAL STUDENT CLEARINGHOUSE Other Contracted Services Organizational Services
318 US-Officers Leadership Trng BUCA Operating Supplies Fire
69 US-New World Lunch CARLOS OKELLYS Operating Supplies Fire
625 US-FDIC Conference Fees FDIC Conference Expense Fire
27 US-Captains Meetings KOWALSKI'S MARKET Operating Supplies Fire
21 US-SW Joint Ops Mtg CULVER'S Operating Supplies Fire
286 US-Officers Meeting BUCA Operating Supplies Fire
40 US-UB Online Processing PAYPAL INC Bank and Service Charges Utility Operations-General
40 US-UB Recurring Credit Card PAYPAL INC Bank and Service Charges Utility Operations-General
13 US-UB Credit Cards PAYPAL INC Bank and Service Charges Utility Operations-General
20 US-ePermit Web Security PAYPAL INC Equipment Repair&Maint IT Operating
2,400 US-Feb2012 Bldg Surchgs DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY Building Surcharge General Fund
719 US-Feb2012 Bldg Surchgs DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY Mechanical Surcharge General Fund
491 US-Feb2012 Bldg Surchgs DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY Plumbing Surcharge General Fund
(72) US-Feb2012 Bldg Surchgs DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY Other Revenue General Fund
425 US-GFOA Meeting GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS Awards Finance
200 US-Annual Plan SURVEYMONKEY.COM Dues&Subscriptions Organizational Services
268 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions
47 US-Café Food FRESH SEASONS MARKET Merchandise for Resale Concessions
71 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions
26 US-Café Food CRUMB GOURMET DELI Merchandise for Resale Concessions
958 US-Ice Show Sound/Lighting EMI REPAIRS Other Rentals Ice Show
20 US-Café Food CRUMB GOURMET DELI Merchandise for Resale Concessions
104 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions
105 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions
46 US-Café Food KOWALSKI'S MARKET Merchandise for Resale Concessions
38 US-Hand Stamps OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Operating Supplies Ice Rink#1
39 US-Café Food RAINBOW FOODS INC. Merchandise for Resale Concessions
112 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions
14 US-Café Food RAINBOW FOODS INC. Merchandise for Resale Concessions
21 US-Battery for Lift Station BATTERIES PLUS Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer Liftstation
98 US-Trailer MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
84 US-Website Launch Gift Cards HALLMARK INSIGHTS Miscellaneous Communications
135 US-Northern Llights Award Entr MAGC Awards Communications
116 US-Chargers BEST BUY Operating Supplies Fire
107 US-Supplies APPLE.COM Operating Supplies Fire
161 US-Supplies APPLE.COM Operating Supplies Fire
Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit
122 US-Supplies APPLE.COM Operating Supplies Fire
67 US-Sunshine Fund-J Claeys BACHMANS CREDIT DEPT Deposits Escrow
212 US-Council Workshop food DAVANNI'S PIZZA Miscellaneous City Council
60 US-Sunshine fund V Rudolph BACHMANS CREDIT DEPT Deposits Escrow
60 US-Sunshine Fund R Geis BACHMANS CREDIT DEPT Deposits Escrow
292 US-Council Workshop food QDOBA MEXICAN GRILL Miscellaneous City Council
67 US-Sunshine Fund T Johnson BACHMANS CREDIT DEPT Deposits Escrow
38 US-Luncheon-N Tyra-Lukens SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION Miscellaneous City Council
32 US-Council Kitchen AMAZON.COM Miscellaneous Administration
17 US-Council Kitchen WALMART COMMUNITY Miscellaneous Administration
165 US-Retirement Gift HALLMARK INSIGHTS Employee Award Organizational Services
13 US-Squad Car Wash CAR WASH Equipment Repair&Maint Police
45 US-Gas 7-ELEVEN Motor Fuels Fleet Operating
46 US-Gas SHEETZ Motor Fuels Fleet Operating
35 US-Gas SHELL OIL Motor Fuels Fleet Operating
43 US-Gas ATLAS OIL Motor Fuels Fleet Operating
87 US-Hotel COURTYARD MARRIOTT Tuition Reimbursement/School Police
27 US-Gas MARATHON OIL Motor Fuels Fleet Operating
38 US-Gas HOLIDAY STATION STORES INC Motor Fuels Fleet Operating
23 US-Paint for Cabinet HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Utility Operations-General
32 US-Tripod for shop MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance
739 US-Water Main Locator Repair METROTECH CORPORATION Equipment Repair&Maint Water System Maintenance
464 US-Utilities Map Books XPEDX PAPER&GRAPHICS Office Supplies Utility Operations-General
35 US-Shop Supplies MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
58 US-City/School Annual Meeting CRUMB GOURMET DELI Miscellaneous Recreation Admin
33 US-Class Training CRUMB GOURMET DELI Miscellaneous Recreation Admin
473 US-FDIC Conference Fees UNITED AIR Conference Expense Fire
473 US-FDIC Conference Fees UNITED AIR Conference Expense Fire
74 US-FDIC Conference Fees CARLSON WAGONLIT TRAVEL Conference Expense Fire
42 US-Supplies MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
112 US-Trailer Supplies MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
16 US-Shop Supplies-Trailer NAPA AUTO PARTS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
61 US-Shop Supplies-Trailer NAPA AUTO PARTS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
17 US-Shop Supplies-Trailer NAPA AUTO PARTS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
72 US-Shop Supplies-Trailer BATTERIES PLUS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
10 US-Shop Supplies-Trailer FASTENAL COMPANY Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
184 US-Shop Supplies-Trailer MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
34 US-Shop Supplies-Trailer OLSEN CHAIN&CABLE Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
208 US-Shop Supplies-Trailer FASTENAL COMPANY Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
141 US-Shop Supplies-Trailer NAPA AUTO PARTS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
79 US-Garbage Bags and Pickers HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Landscape Materials/Supp Street Maintenance
427 US-Airfare DELTA AIR Travel Expense City Clerk
8 US-MCFOA Annual Conference QDOBA MEXICAN GRILL Conference Expense City Clerk
287 US-MCFOA Annual Conference BEST WESTERN KELLY INN,THE Conference Expense City Clerk
64 US-Slow Moving Vehicle MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer Liftstation
83 US-Squad 293 WALSER BLOOMINGTON TOYOTA Equipment Repair&Maint Police
72 US-Conservation NIAGARA CONSERVATION Operating Supplies Environmental Education
85 US-Equipment AM LEONARD Small Tools Park Maintenance
3 US-Mower Maint. MENARDS Small Tools Park Maintenance
64 US-Mower Equip. HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Small Tools Park Maintenance
97 US-Stork Pins PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING CONSULT Operating Supplies Police
Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit
138 US-Child Safety Seat Inspectio AMAZON.COM Operating Supplies Police
130 US-Child Safety Seat Inspectio AMAZON.COM Operating Supplies Police
140 US-Child Safety Seat Inspectio AMAZON.COM Operating Supplies Police
14 US-Reserve Calendar CALENDAR WIZ Operating Supplies Reserves
210 US-White-Uniforms BACKDEFENSESYSTEMS.COM Clothing&Uniforms Police
160 US-Crime Scene Tech Training PAYPAL INC Tuition Reimbursement/School Police
15 US-Cab Cards for Dump Trucks OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Operating Supplies Street Maintenance
(86) US-School HOLIDAY INN Tuition Reimbursement/School Fire
70 US-School NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EMTS Tuition Reimbursement/School Fire
(12) US-Credit ADVANTAGE KITCHEN&BATH Repair&Maint.Supplies City Hall-CAM
177 US-HVAC Supplies TMS JOHNSON Repair&Maint.Supplies Public Works/Parks
1,378 US-HVAC Supplies TMS JOHNSON Repair&Maint.Supplies Public Works/Parks
354 US-City HVAC Supplies TMS JOHNSON Repair&Maint.Supplies City Hall-CAM
155 US-Shop#711 MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance
51 US-Shop#711 NAPA AUTO PARTS Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance
(16) US-Return MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance
9 US-Cake for Meeting RAINBOW FOODS INC. Operating Supplies Arts
347 US-Summer Musical MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL Operating Supplies Summer Theatre
35 US-Birthday Party Supplies MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Arts Center
21 US-Lock for Sound System TARGET Operating Supplies Recreation Admin
22 US-WILS Meeting PAYPAL INC Operating Supplies Arts Center
44 US-Birthday Parties/Summer Cam JO-ANN FABRICS Operating Supplies Arts Center
12 US-Script for Winter Play DRAMATISTS PLAY SERVICE INC Operating Supplies Winter Theatre
33 US-Volunteer Software VOLGISTICS Other Contracted Services Recreation Admin
109 US-Clay Tool Kits AMAZON.COM Operating Supplies Arts Center
84 US-Audio Equip for Concert Ser PROAUDIO.COM Operating Supplies Staring Lake Concert
526 US-Audio Equip for Concert Ser SWEETWATER MUSIC TECHNOLOGY DI Operating Supplies Staring Lake Concert
25 US-Art Camp Supplies MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Arts Center
17 US-Art Camp Supplies MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Arts Center
11 US-Birthday Party Supplies HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Operating Supplies Arts Center
16 US-Art Camp Supplies RAINBOW FOODS INC. Operating Supplies Arts Center
13 US-Art Camp Supplies MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Arts Center
612 US-Pickelball Stands and Nets USAPA Capital Under$10,000 Gymnasium(CC)
160 US-Pickelball Replacement Nets USAPA Operating Supplies Gymnasium(CC)
37 US-Hand Spreader/Fertilizer HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Operating Supplies Street Maintenance
31 US-Polar Plunge Safety Net MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
14 US-Senior Center Shop THOMAS TOOL&SUPPLY Equipment Repair&Maint Senior Center Admin
5 US-Rope for Tennis nets MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance
6 US-Critter Food PETCO Operating Supplies Outdoor Center
36 US-Critter Food PETCO Operating Supplies Outdoor Center
53 US-Tape Measure MENARDS Small Tools Park Maintenance
5 US-Parts MERLINS ACE HARDWARE Equipment Repair&Maint Public Safety Communications
46 US-Stand By Crew Lunch FIVE GUYS Operating Supplies Fire
5 US-Cotton Swabs WALGREEN'S#5080 Training Supplies Police
8 US-Black Tape SPORTS WORLD USA INC Training Supplies Police
7 US-Supplies US BANK Operating Supplies Police
356 US-Travel Expense SUN COUNTRY Tuition Reimbursement/School Police
138 US-Travel Expense AMERICAN AIRLINES Tuition Reimbursement/School Police
138 US-Travel Expense AMERICAN AIRLINES Tuition Reimbursement/School Police
138 US-Travel Expense AMERICAN AIRLINES Tuition Reimbursement/School Police
70 US-Basic EMT NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EMTS Tuition Reimbursement/School Police
Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit
364 US-Supplies BROWNELLS INC. Training Supplies Police
150 US-For cleaning Basins GANDER MOUNTAIN Clothing&Uniforms Water Treatment Plant
77 US-Spring Break Programs ORIENTAL TRADING Operating Supplies CC-Special Events&Trips
96 US-Family Bingo TARGET Operating Supplies CC-Special Events&Trips
114 US-Bingo Prizes WALGREEN'S#5080 Operating Supplies CC-Special Events&Trips
62 US-Rec Supplies Programs PARTY CITY Operating Supplies Youth Programs Admin
4 US-Socks for Participants EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER Operating Supplies CC-Special Events&Trips
160 US-Spring Break Programs CHUCK-E-CHEESE Operating Supplies CC-Special Events&Trips
229 US-Spring Break Programs MINNESOTA ZOO Operating Supplies CC-Special Events&Trips
90 US-DOT License DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG Conference Expense Fleet Operating
9 US-Supplies-Around Town Progra TARGET Special Event Fees CC-Around Town
51 US-Around Town Program DAVANNI'S PIZZA Operating Supplies CC-Around Town
10 US-Everyone Can Dance supplies KOWALSKI'S MARKET Operating Supplies CC-Leisure Education
63 US-Saturday Night Out Supplies TARGET Operating Supplies SC-Saturday Night Out
21 US-Young Athletes Supplies KOWALSKI'S MARKET Operating Supplies CC-New Adaptive
95 US-Around Town Program STAGES THEATRE COMPANY Special Event Fees Around Town
288 US-Supplies GAIAM Operating Supplies Fitness Classes
69 US-Fitness Floor Supplies GAIAM Operating Supplies Fitness Center
482 US-Safety Ed Supplies MCRMEDICAL SUPPLY Operating Supplies Pool Lessons
51 US-CPR Training AED SUPERSTORE Safety Supplies Pool Lessons
49 US-Training KOWALSKI'S MARKET Operating Supplies Community Center Admin
249 US-Apparel ADOLPH KIEFER&ASSOCIATES Clothing&Uniforms Pool Operations
195 US-Storage for Fitness TARGET Operating Supplies Fitness Classes
304 US-Personal Training Supplies GAIAM Operating Supplies Fitness Center
12 US-Training Supplies MENARDS Training Supplies Police
104 US-Weapon Repair FEDEX Training Supplies Police
489 US-Training Supplies ERBERT&GERBERT'S Training Supplies Police
138 US-Conference R Browning AMERICAN AIRLINES Conference Expense IT Operating
138 US-Conference B Kaehler AMERICAN AIRLINES Conference Expense IT Operating
4 US-Conference R Browning AMERICAN AIRLINES Conference Expense IT Operating
4 US-Conference B Kaehler AMERICAN AIRLINES Conference Expense IT Operating
21 US-Cables AMAZON.COM Computers IT Operating
31 US-iPad Adapter APPLE.COM Computers IT Operating
535 US-Storage Room Rocking ACCENT STORE FIXTURES Office Supplies Utility Operations-General
13 US-Ice Melt MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
51 US-Wheels to repair Cart HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Utility Operations-General
26 US-Storage Room Shelves MENARDS Office Supplies Utility Operations-General
7 US-Storage Room Shelves MENARDS Office Supplies Utility Operations-General
14 US-Shop Supplies HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
136 US-Racks for Storage Room ACCENT STORE FIXTURES Office Supplies Utility Operations-General
14 US-Shop Supplies HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
11 US-Shop Supplies HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
55 US-Cleaning Supplies-shop HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Operating Supplies Utility Operations-General
29 US-Tools MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Utility Operations-General
2 US-Flushing Hose NAPA AUTO PARTS Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance
46,036 Report Total
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Ordinances and Resolutions May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: IC 02-5585 ITEM NO.: XI.A.
Leslie Stovring Approve First Reading of an Ordinance
Public Works/Environmental Adding City Code Section 5.75
Requested Action
Move to: Approve First Reading of an Ordinance adding City Code Section 5.75 relating to
illicit discharge detection and enforcement.
Synopsis
In 2011 the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) stated that the Illicit Discharge and
Detection Enforcement(IDDE)provisions required in our Phase II NPDES stormwater permit
were not met by our existing city code. The MPCA requested that the city provide an illicit
discharge detection and enforcement ordinance that specifically references non-stormwater
discharges to the city's stormwater system or risk being seen as not in compliance with our
permit. This ordinance was based on a model ordinance provided by the MPCA.
Background Information
In June 2011 the MPCA requested a copy of what the City was using to regulate our IDDE
program as part of the Annual Report. The MPCA stated that the IDDE provisions that we
provided did not specifically address stormwater discharges to the municipal stormwater system.
The regulatory mechanism was required to be in place by June 30, 2010. In response, the city
has completed the attached ordinance to meet these requirements. Preliminary review by the
MPCA indicates that the draft ordinance does meet their requirements.
Attachment
• Ordinance - City Code Section 5.75
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. -2012
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY
CODE CHAPTER 5 BY ADDING SECTION 5.75 RELATING TO STORMWATER
ILLICIT DISCHARGE AND CONNECTIONS AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY
CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 5.99 WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS CONTAIN
PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code Chapter 5 is amended by adding Section 5.75 to read as follows:
SECTION 5.75—STORMWATER ILLICIT DISCHARGE AND CONNECTIONS
Subd. 1. Declaration of Policy and Purpose. The purpose of this section is to set forth minimum
requirements for stormwater management that will diminish threats to public health, safety, public
and private property, and natural resources of the community by establishing standards that protect
the city's lakes, ponds, wetlands, and streams from pollutants carried in urban runoff. This
ordinance establishes methods for controlling the introduction of pollutants into the Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) in order to comply with the requirements of the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit process.
Subd. 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this Section, the following terms, phrases, and words
shall have the meanings stated below.
A. "Illicit discharge". Any direct or indirect non-stormwater discharge to the storm sewer
system except as exempted in Subd. 4 of this ordinance.
B. "Illicit connection". Any drain or conveyance, whether on the surface or subsurface, which
allows an illegal discharge to enter the storm drain system including but not limited to any
non-stormwater discharge such as sewage, process wastewater, and wash water, and any
connections to the storm drain system from indoor drains and sinks, regardless of whether
said drain or connection had been previously allowed, permitted, or approved by an
authorized enforcement agency.
C. "Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System(MS4)". A stormwater conveyance or unified
stormwater conveyance system(including without limitation roads with drainage systems,
municipal streets, catch basins, stormwater detention facilities, curbs, gutters, ditches,
natural or man-made channels or storm drains that are located within the corporate limits of
Eden Prairie, MN and are owned or operated by the City, State, County or other public
body.
Illicit Discharge Regulations
City of Eden Prairie
City Code Chapter 5.75
Page 1 of 7
D. "MPCA". The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
E. "NPDES". The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program
which controls water pollution by regulating sources that discharge pollutants into waters of
the United States.
F. "Pollutant". Any man-made or man-induced alteration of the chemical, physical, biological,
thermal and/or radiological integrity of the water which has the potential to harm human life,
aquatic life, terrestrial plant life and/or wildlife.
G. "Stormwater". Any surface flow, runoff, and drainage consisting entirely of water from any
form of natural precipitation and resulting from such precipitation.
H. "Stormwater System". A Stormwater System includes any stormwater facility, drainage
work or improvement that is designed to transport, convey or control the flow of stormwater
or that improves or controls the water quality of stormwater. This shall include but is not
limited to, outfalls, inlets, outlets, conduits, pipes, curbs, municipal streets, catch basins,
gutters, ditches, pumping stations, manholes, structures, channels, retention or detention
basins, infiltration areas, filtration systems and other structural components and equipment
that are used for managing storm drainage or surface water. Stormwater Systems include
both Public and Private Systems.
i. Public Stormwater Systems are those Stormwater Systems that are under the
control and/or ownership of the city, county, state or federal government.
Public Stormwater Systems includes all Waters of the State located within the
City that are used for managing the surface water system.
ii. Private Stormwater Systems are those Stormwater Systems that are not under
the control or ownership of the city, county, state and/or federal government.
I. "Surface water or waters". All streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, wetlands, reservoirs, springs,
rivers, drainage systems, waterways, watercourses, or irrigation systems, whether natural or
artificial, public or private.
J. "Wastewater". Any water or other liquid waste, other than uncontaminated stormwater, that
has been used, such as for washing, flushing, or in a manufacturing process, and so contains
waste products, discharged from a facility and collected in a sewer system and conveyed to a
sewage treatment plant for processing.
Subd. 3. Stormwater and urban runoff control. All water entering the stormwater system will
be protected from illegal disposal/dumping and illicit discharges and connections.
Illicit Discharge Regulations
City of Eden Prairie
City Code Chapter 5.75
Page 2 of 7
A. Illegal disposal/dumping. No person shall throw, drain or otherwise discharge, cause or
allow others under its control to throw, drain or otherwise discharge into a Stormwater
System any pollutants or waters containing any pollutants other than stormwater.
B. Illicit discharges and connections.
1. No person shall cause any illicit discharge to enter a Stormwater System.
2. No person shall use any illicit connection to intentionally convey non-stormwater to
a Stormwater System.
3. The construction, use, maintenance or continued existence of illicit connections to a
Stormwater System is prohibited. This prohibition includes, without limitation; illicit
connections made in the past, regardless of whether the connection was permissible
under law or practices applicable or prevailing at the time of connection.
Subd. 4. Exemptions. The following activities shall be exempt from Subd. 3.
A. Discharge of non-stormwater discharge that is authorized by an NPDES permit, Notice of
Intent, waiver, or wastewater discharge order issued to the discharger and administered
under the authority of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) or MPCA,
B. Firefighting activities or other activities necessary to protect public health and safety,
C. Dye testing, but such testing requires written notification to the City Engineering
Department prior to the time of the test,
D. Water line flushing or flushing of other potable water sources,
E. Landscape irrigation or lawn watering,
F. Residential car washing,
G. Diverted stream flows that have a Permit from the Minnesota Depailinent of Natural
Resources (DNR) or MPCA,
H. Uncontaminated ground water infiltration,
I. Foundation or footing drains that discharge uncontaminated groundwater,
J. Crawl space pumps,
K. Air conditioning condensation,
L. Noncommercial washing of vehicles,
Illicit Discharge Regulations
City of Eden Prairie
City Code Chapter 5.75
Page 3 of 7
M. Natural wetland flows,
N. Dechlorinated swimming pool water,
O. Street wash water discharged that is necessary for health or safety purposes and not in
violation of any other provisions of city code,
P. Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, and
Q. Any other water source not containing a pollutant.
Subd. 5. Good Housekeeping Provisions. Any owner or occupant of property within the City
shall comply with the following good housekeeping requirements.
A. No person shall leave, deposit, discharge, dump or otherwise introduce pollutants in an area
where discharge to streets or the storm drain system occurs.
B. For pools greater than 1,000 gallons in size, water shall sit a minimum of seven (7) days
without the addition of chlorine to allow for chlorine to evaporate before discharge.
C. Any facility subject to a MPCA General Stormwater Permit for Industrial or Construction
Activity shall comply with all provisions of such permit including the creation of a
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The Proof of Coverage from the MPCA of
the Stormwater Permit must be submitted to the City before any discharge occurs under the
permit. Proof of compliance with said permit shall be provided in a form acceptable to the
city upon the City's request.
D. As soon as any person responsible for a facility or operation has information of any known
or suspected release of materials that are resulting or may result in illegal discharges or
pollutants discharging into a Stormwater System, said person shall take steps to ensure the
discovery, containment, and cleanup of such release. In the event of such a release of
hazardous materials said person shall immediately notify emergency response agencies of
the occurrence via emergency dispatch services. In the event of a release of non-hazardous
materials, said person shall notify the City in person or by phone or facsimile no later than
the next business day.
Subd. 6. Public Waters Protection. Every person owning property through which Public Waters
pass, as defined in Minn. Stat. §103G.005, Subd. 15, or such person's lessee, shall keep and
maintain that part of the public waters within the property free of trash, debris, excessive vegetation,
and other obstacles that would pollute, contaminate, or significantly retard the flow of water
Illicit Discharge Regulations
City of Eden Prairie
City Code Chapter 5.75
Page 4 of 7
through the public waters. In addition, the owner or lessee shall maintain existing privately owned
structures within or adjacent to public waters, so that such structures will not become a hazard to the
use, function, or physical integrity of the public waters.
Subd. 7. Inspection,Monitoring and Testing.
A. The city shall be permitted to enter and inspect all Stormwater Systems as necessary to
determine compliance with this ordinance. If security measures are in force which require
proper identification and clearance before entry into its premises, the discharger shall make
necessary arrangements to allow access to representatives of the City.
B. Facility operators shall allow the city ready access to all parts of its Stormwater System for
the purposes of inspection, sampling, testing, examination and copying of records that must
be kept under the conditions of a NPDES Permit to discharge stormwater.
C. The city shall have the right to set up at any Stormwater System devices necessary in the
opinion of the City to conduct monitoring, sampling and/or dye testing of the facility's
stormwater discharge.
D. The city has the right to require the discharger to install monitoring equipment as the City
deems necessary. The facility's sampling and monitoring equipment shall be maintained at
all times in a safe and proper operating condition by the discharger at its own expense. All
devices used to measure storm water flow and quality shall be calibrated to ensure their
accuracy.
E. If the city has been refused reasonable access to any Stormwater System and the City is able
to demonstrate probable cause to believe that there may be a violation of this section, or that
there is a need to inspect and/or sample to verify compliance with this chapter or any order
issued hereunder, or to protect the overall public health, safety, and welfare of the
community, then the city may seek issuance of a search warrant from any court of
competent jurisdiction.
Subd. 8. Violations and Penalties. It shall be unlawful to violate any provision or fail to comply
with any of the requirements of this ordinance.
A. The city may, without prior notice, suspend Stormwater System access to any building/site
when such suspension is necessary to stop an actual or threatened discharge which presents
or may present imminent and substantial danger to the environment, or to the health or
welfare of persons, or to the storm sewer system or surface waters.
Illicit Discharge Regulations
City of Eden Prairie
City Code Chapter 5.75
Page 5 of 7
B. In the event the violation constitutes an immediate danger to public health or safety, the City
is authorized to enter upon the subject property without giving prior notice to take any and
all measures necessary to abate the violation and/or restore the property.
C. Failure to comply with a suspension order issued in an emergency will result in any process
deemed necessary to prevent or minimize damage to the storm sewer system or surface
waters, or to minimize danger to persons.
Subd. 9. Violation deemed a Public Nuisance. In addition to the enforcement processes and
penalties provided, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions
of this ordinance is a threat to public health, safety, and welfare, and is declared and deemed a
nuisance, and may be summarily abated or restored at the violator's expense, and/or a civil action to
abate, enjoin, or otherwise compel the cessation of such nuisance may be taken.
Subd. 10. Cost of Abatement of the Violation. Within 30 days after abatement of the violation,
the owner of the property will be notified of the cost of abatement, including administrative costs.
The property owner may file a written protest objecting to the amount of the assessment within 7
days. If the amount due is not paid within a timely manner as determined by the decision of the
municipal authority or by the expiration of the time in which to file an appeal, the City may assess
the charges against the property. Any person violating any of the provisions of this article shall
become liable to the city by reason of such violation.
Subd. 11. Remedies not Exclusive. The remedies listed in this ordinance are not exclusive of any
other remedies available under any applicable federal, state or local law and it is within the
discretion of the city to seek cumulative remedies. The City may recover all attorney's fees court
costs and other expenses associated with enforcement of this ordinance, including sampling and
monitoring expenses.
Subd. 12. Compatibility with Other Regulations. This ordinance is not intended to modify or
repeal any other ordinance, rule, regulation, or other provision of law. The requirements of this
ordinance are in addition to the requirements of any other ordinance, rule, regulation, or other
provision of law, and where any provision of this ordinance imposes restrictions different from
those imposed by any other ordinance, rule, regulation, or other provision of law, whichever
provision is more restrictive or imposes higher protective standards for human health or the
environment shall control.
Subd. 13. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance is found to be invalid for any reason by
a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity of the remaining provisions shall not be affected.
Subd. 14. Ultimate Responsibility. The standards set forth herein and promulgated pursuant to
this ordinance are minimum standards; therefore this ordinance does not intend or imply that
compliance by any person will ensure that there will be no contamination, pollution, or
unauthorized discharge of pollutants.
Illicit Discharge Regulations
City of Eden Prairie
City Code Chapter 5.75
Page 6 of 7
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the
Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 5.99 entitled "Violation a
Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim
herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the
day of , 2012, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a
regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 2012.
City
Clerk Mayor
Published in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 2012.
Illicit Discharge Regulations
City of Eden Prairie
City Code Chapter 5.75
Page 7 of 7
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Reports of Council Members May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: XIV.A.1.
City Council Budget Advisory Commission Report on
Mayor and Council Salary
Requested Action
Synopsis
At the request of the City Council, the BAC conducted a review of Mayoral and Council salary
to provide rationale for making any changes. The BAC reviewed Mayor and Council salary of
other cities, the history of salary, and other information that is included in the report. After an
analysis of the data and discussion among the commission members the BAC report concluded
as follows:
The BAC believes there is adequate data to support a salary increase. In the future, the BAC
recommends blending the technology stipend and salary components together. Some pros and
cons of the potential salary increase follow:
PROS
• Balance to other cities
• Discontinuance of special meeting pay in 2010
• Adjustment for inflation
CONS
• Difficult economy
• Citizen perception/public opinion
Attachments
• Mayor and Council Salary Report
EDEN
PRAIRIE
To: Mayor and City Council LivE•woRK•oREnM
Rick Getschow, City Manager
From: Budget Advisory Commission
Date: May 2012
Re: Report on Mayor and Council Salary
At the request of the City Council, the BAC conducted a review of mayoral and council pay at its March
1, 2012 meeting. With the aid of comparison data, prepared by City Staff, the Commission reviewed the
compensation of Eden Prairie's Mayor and Council in contrast to the remuneration granted to Council
Members in roughly thirty other metropolitan areas surrounding the Twin Cities.
Background data indicates that Council Members last received pay raises in 2004 and 1992 respectively.
Currently, the Mayor receives an annual salary of $9,900 plus $60 per month as a technology stipend,
resulting in an adjusted gross salary of $10,620 per year. Each council member receives $7,500 in
annual salary, resulting in an adjusted gross salary of $8,220 per year after factoring in the monthly
technology stipend.
A technology stipend of $60 per month is given to each Council Member for costs incurred by them for
equipment such as a computer or cell phone necessary to conduct City business. Ultimately, the City
reports the technology stipend as personal income, rather than expense reimbursement to the Council
Members. Council Members can also request reimbursement for Internet service.
Further, the October 2010 discontinuance of special meeting pay ($35 per meeting) effectively reduced
Council Members' compensation from 2010 to the present. A total of $5,530 for 158 special meetings
and $2,100 for 60 special meetings was paid respectively in 2009 and 2010.
Council Members attend a workshop that precedes each City Council meeting. Increasing the ancillary
time commitment required of their positions, the Mayor and Council Members also sit on various
boards. In response to citizens' emails and phone calls, a considerable amount of ad hoc time is an
inherent demand on the Councils' time. However, Council Members do not document the time spent
on city business. Therefore, without data, an effective comparison of pay per hour worked is not an
option when reviewing the Councils' past, or current, rates of pay. However, if calculating an hourly
equivalent was feasible, the BAC assumes that the result would be quite low and that, rather, Council
salaries serve to offset personal costs and expenses incurred by the Council Members in the course of
their civic duties.
1
Although the rationale used to determine the initial level of the Council's pay is unknown, review of the
current metropolitan pay data indicates that council pay ranges from an adjusted high of $12,996 per
annum in Bloomington (population 84,701), to a low of $5,880 in Hastings (population 22,491).
Concurrently, mayoral pay ranged from an adjusted high of$27,000 per annum in Bloomington, to a low
of$7,740 in Shakopee.
Contemplating that population might act as an appropriate cost driver and provide a meaningful
comparison, the BAC viewed the data again, filtered to display only metropolitan cities comprised of
comparable population. The tables below illustrate the data for metropolitan cities with populations of
greater than 60,000 and less than 70,000.
Adjusted
City Population Mayoral Mayoral
Salary Salary
Burnsville 61,042 $12,000 $12,000
Coon Rapids 63,162 $14,000 $14,000
Eagan 64,206 $13,625 $13,625
Eden Prairie 62,536 $9,900 $10,620
Maple Grove 62,660 $14,500 $14,500
Adjusted
City Population Council Member Council Member
Salary Salary
Burnsville 61,042 $8,400 $8,400
$12,250(at
large),$10,500
Coon Rapids 63,162 (ward) $12,250
Eagan 64,206 $10,000 $10,000
Eden Prairie 62,536 $7,500 $8,220
Maple Grove 62,660 $12,500 $12,500
The BAC notes that this comparison places both Eden Prairie's council and mayoral pay as the lowest in
each of these statistical samples. Viewed as an independent variable, balancing Council pay to that of
other cities would support a recommendation to consider an increase in pay for the Mayor and City
Council Members.
However, when council and mayoral pay is compared based on the GDP deflator, the results indicate
that council pay is slightly below the 20-year average while mayoral pay is slightly above the 20-year
average as illustrated in the following chart:
2
Council Mayor
Inflation Inflation
Salary Technology Total GDP Deflator% 2005 Dollars adjusted Salary Technology Total GDP Deflator% 2005 Dollars adjusted
1993 6,000.00 6,000 78.29 7,663.81 7,200 7,200 78.29 9,196.58
1994 6,000.00 6,000 79.94 7,505.63 7,200 7,200 79.94 9,006.76
1995 6,000.00 6,000 81.61 7,352.40 7,200 7,200 81.61 8,822.88
1996 6,000.00 6,000 83.16 7,215.09 7,200 7,200 83.16 8,658.11
1997 6,000.00 6,000 84.63 7,089.85 7,200 7,200 84.63 8,507.82
1998 6,000.00 6,000 85.58 7,010.66 7,200 7,200 85.58 8,412.79
1999 6,000.00 6,000 86.84 6,909.10 7,200 7,200 86.84 8,290.92
2000 6,000.00 120 6,120 88.72 6,897.87 7,200 120 7,320 88.72 8,250.40
2001 6,000.00 720 6,720 90.73 7,406.84 7,200 720 7,920 90.73 8,729.49
2002 6,000.00 720 6,720 92.20 7,288.82 7,200 720 7,920 92.20 8,590.39
2003 6,000.00 720 6,720 94.14 7,138.68 7,200 720 7,920 94.14 8,413.45
2004 6,000.00 720 6,720 96.79 6,943.15 7,200 720 7,920 96.79 8,183.00
2005 7,500.00 720 8,220 100.00 8,220.00 9,900 720 10,620 100.00 10,620.00
2006 7,500.00 720 8,220 103.23 7,962.72 9,900 720 10,620 103.23 10,287.61
2007 7,500.00 720 8,220 106.23 7,738.15 9,900 720 10,620 106.23 9,997.46
2008 7,500.00 720 8,220 108.58 7,570.32 9,900 720 10,620 108.58 9,780.63
2009 7,500.00 720 8,220 109.73 7,491.18 9,900 720 10,620 109.73 9,678.39
2010 7,500.00 720 8,220 110.99 7,405.94 9,900 720 10,620 110.99 9,568.26
2011 7,500.00 720 8,220 113.36 7,251.17 9,900 720 10,620 113.36 9,368.30
2012 7,500.00 720 8,220 116.31 7,067.42 9,900 720 10,620 116.31 9,130.90
Average 7,356.44 9,074.71
2013* 118.64 6,928.64 9,752.04 10,620 118.64 8,951.60 12,599.36
*-2013 figures projected based on average GDP adjustment for 2005-2012
The chart above shows the history of Mayor and Council salary, the amount of the technology stipend
which began in 2000, and a total salary amount. The 2005 dollars column shows the purchasing power
of the salary based on 2005 dollars, the last time the salary was increased. The inflation adjusted
amount reflects the amount of salary adjusted by the GDP deflator since 2005.
While some cities such as Eagan and Burnsville offer a health insurance benefit, Eden Prairie Council
members can opt in to the health care benefit but they are required to pay the full premium for their
coverage. Cities are prohibited from including provisions for vacation or sick leave in the compensation
plan for council members. Cities are also prohibited from reducing the salaries of council members
because of absences from official duties because of vacation or illness.
Minnesota statutes dictate that no increase in salary shall take effect until after the next succeeding
regular city election. Therefore, if the Council decides to adjust pay during 2012 the pay adjustment
would be implemented in 2013 or 2015.
The BAC believes there is adequate data to support a salary increase. In the future, the BAC
recommends blending the technology stipend and salary components together. Some pros and cons of
the potential salary increase follow:
PROS
• Balance to other cities
• Discontinuance of special meeting pay in 2010
• Adjustment for inflation
3
CONS
• Difficult economy
• Citizen perception/public opinion
Respectfully submitted,
The Budget Advisory Commission
4
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Report of the Parks and Recreation Director May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: XIV.D.1.
Jay Lotthammer, Director, Accept the E.P. Community Foundation
Parks and Recreation Grant for Audio/Visual Equipment at the
Senior Center
Requested Action
Move to: Adopt resolution accepting the grant in the amount of$3,000 from the Eden Prairie
Community Foundation to be used toward the purchase of new audio/visual equipment; projector
and screen for the Eden Prairie Senior Center.
Synopsis
The grant in the amount of$3,000 will be used in combination with matching funds from the
Eden Prairie Senior Advisory Council ($2,645), and a memorial donation in memory of Ruth
Dover who was an active volunteer and regular participant at the Senior Center($700) for a total
project cost of$6,345.
The grant will be used to purchase audio/visual equipment for the Senior Center. The equipment
includes a projector and screen which will be used for presentations during classes, events,
meetings and rentals. The proposed audio/visual equipment will include a portable projector and
screen that can be used in any room in the building.
Background
The Senior Center provides a wide variety of social, recreational and educational opportunities
for adults and seniors, including special events, educational classes, trips and social activities. In
addition, the Senior Center is also used as a rental facility for meetings, classes and gatherings.
This new audio/visual equipment will be used for both City programs, meetings and functions as
well as for outside rental groups.
Attachments
Resolution
Letter from the Eden Prairie Community Foundation
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
RESOLUTION RELATING TO ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL THAT:
The gift to the City in the amount of$3,000 Grant from the Eden Prairie Community
Foundation to be used toward the purchase of new audio/visual equipment; projector and
screen for the Eden Prairie Senior Center, is hereby recognized and accepted by the Eden
Prairie City Council.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 15th day of May 2012.
Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk
April 26, 2012
City of Eden Prairie
Senior Center
EDENPRAIRIE Sue Bohnsack
FOUNDATION 8950'Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 ' Dear Sue and Board,
Mission: We are pleased to inform you that on April 19, 2012 the Board of
Enriching our community Directors of The Eden Prairie Community Foundation approved a grant
through philanthropy, in the amount of$3,000 to Senior Center for the purpose as described
collaboration and in your grant request.
leadership. Purchase of Audio/Visual equipment
Board of Directors: Our Grant Committee worked diligently and put much thought and
consideration into the selection of the proposals to fund. Although the
Patrick Bernal Community Foundation cannot always grant the full request, we are
Dan Boeckermann happy to be able to play a role in the success of worthwhile programs
Carol Bomben such as yours.
Katie Castro
Bruce Hutchins Please read the enclosed Grant Acceptance Letter carefully as it covers
David Lindahl the terms and conditions of this grant. Please sign and return one copy
Doug Loon to our office and keep the other for your files. No grant payment can be
Nancy Tyra Lukens made until the signed contract is returned.
Mary Mackmiller We invite you to attend our Grant Breakfast on Thursday May 17, 2012
Peggy Muller at Biaggi's Ristorante ltaliano (8251 Flying Cloud Dr EP)at 7:30am.
Kathy Nelson Please RSVP by May 14'h
Scott Otis
Sara Ulschmid Congratulations on being awarded the above grant. We wish you every
Dick Ward success in accomplishing the goals of this program. If you have any
questions, please feel free to give me a call.
Phone: Sincerely,
952-949-8499j
Abe4A-7/-
E-mail Address:
ExecDirna tepcf.orq Laura Hookom
Executive Director
Web Address: execdir(aftepcf.orq
www.edenprairiefoundation.orq (c) 952-210-2798
Enclose: Grant Acceptance Letter
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Report of the Parks and Recreation Director May 15, 2012
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: XIV.D.2.
Jay Lotthammer, Director, Hennepin Youth Sports Grant Sports
Parks and Recreation Equipment Recipient
Requested Action
Move to: Adopt resolution accepting the $9,500 Sports Equipment Grant from the Hennepin
Youth Sports Program to purchase a John Deere Utility Vehicle for the Miller Park Softball
Complex.
Synopsis
The City of Eden Prairie partnered with the Eden Prairie Fastpitch Softball Association on a
sports equipment grant application earlier this spring for a new utility vehicle which could be
used by the Eden Prairie Fastpitch Association, the City of Eden Prairie and other Eden Prairie
Youth Athletic Associations. The new gator, a John Deer utility vehicle, will be used at the
Miller Park pinwheel complex. It will be used primarily to drag aglime infields, haul equipment,
collect trash and assist with other special event projects.
This utility vehicle will directly benefit the Eden Prairie Fastpitch Association league play,
clinics, tournaments, including the Eden Prairie High School Fastpitch teams. This utility vehicle
will also benefit other youth athletic associations, including the Eden Prairie Baseball
Association and Eden Prairie Soccer Club who also use outdoor athletic facilities at Miller Park.
In addition, the utility vehicle can be used for community events such as the 4th of July
Celebration, Safety Camp and the City-wide Open House.
Background
The City of Eden Prairie has a close working relationship with the various Eden Prairie Youth
Athletic Associations. These organizations offer Eden Prairie youth the opportunity to learn a
sport and participate in leagues, clinics and tournaments. Each organization is operated
independently. Many of these organizations use city and school facilities; however,they organize
and manage their own registration,tryouts, scheduling and operations.
There are 16 youth athletic associations in Eden Prairie. The City of Eden Prairie provides each
association with a designated City staff liaison who provides support and assistance as required
when using City outdoor athletic facilities (i.e. scheduling, maintenance, improvement projects,
etc.). In addition,the Eden Prairie Youth Athletic Associations are provided meeting space for
their monthly board meetings.
Attachments
Resolution
Email from Hennepin Youth Sports Program
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
RESOLUTION RELATING TO ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL THAT:
The gift to the City in the amount of$9,500 Sports Equipment Grant from the Hennepin
Youth Sports Program to purchase a John Deere Utility Vehicle for the Miller Park Softball
Complex, is hereby recognized and accepted by the Eden Prairie City Council.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 15th day of May 2012.
Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen Porta, City Clerk
Original Message
From: Jan.Craig@co.hennepin.mn.us [mailto:Jan.Craig@co.hennepin.mn.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 3:46 PM
To: Jay Lotthammer
Cc: Lynda Lynch; Cara.Lee@co.hennepin.mn.us; Randy.Johnson@co.hennepin.mn.us
Subject: Hennepin Youth Sports Equipment Grant Award - City of Eden Prairie
Congratulations! Today, Tuesday, April 10, 2012, the Hennepin County Board of
Commissioners approved the list of recipients for the Spring 2012 Hennepin Youth
Sports Equipment Program. Your application for a John Deere Gator for Miller
Park in the amount of $9,500 has been approved.
In the next few weeks, you will receive some information from the Minnesota
Amateur Sports Commission (MASC) as to how to proceed. MASC will be your contact
for the project until it is completed. If you have any questions or need more
information please contact Stephen Olson, Program Director at MASC at 763-782-
3639 or solson@nscsports.org.
Here is the agreement for the above mentioned equipment as part of the Hennepin
Youth Sports Grants Program. Please review and print at least two
copies, get them signed and return to me at the address shown below. Once they
are signed here at the County, I will return a fully executed copy to you.
The agreement states in Section 2, use of funds: The LGU agrees that the
Equipment will display a plaque, decal or sticker, as agreed to by the LGU and
COUNTY, identifying that the Equipment was purchased with funds provided by the
Hennepin Youth Sports Program. Cara Lee, in Hennepin County Public Affairs, will
work with you on determining which form of display will be used and will provide
the display. Please contact her at
612--348-6883 or cara.lee@co.hennepin.mn.us.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
(See attached file: EP John Deere for Miller Park A120518.pdf)
Jan Craig Svidron
Senior Administrative Assistant
Hennepin County Administration
A-2303 Government Center
Minneapolis, MN 55487-0233
612-348-4112 (Mail Code 233)