Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 03/20/1979 JOHN D. FRAME y, EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY,, MARCH 20, 1979 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger UTstad; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; Engineer Carl Jullie; and Donna Stanley, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS ; II. MINUTES OF COUNCIL MEETINGS HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1979, AND Page 573 MARCH 6, 1979 Page 583 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List Page 590�` B. Set hearing date to vacate excess portion of W. 74th Street in Page 591 . Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition for April 17, 1979 (Resolution No. 79-54) C. Final plat approval for Eden Prairie Center 2nd (Resolution No. Page 592A. 79-56 D. Final plat approval for Olympic Hills 5th (Resolution No. 79-57) Page 593 E. Set Public Hearing for High Trail Estates rezoning to'R1-13.5 by Page 596 Countryside Investment for April 17, 1979 F. Set Public Hearing for St. Andrew's Church rezoning to Public for Page 597 April 17, 1979 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Shady Oak Road PUD by D. H. Gustafson & Associates, Inc. Request Page 598 for PUD Concept approval for multiple family housing, regional office, office, and commercial uses. The PUD is located in Section 1, South of Crosstown 62, East of Co. Rd. 61, and West of U.S. 169/212 ?. (Resolution No. 79-51, approving Shady Oak Road PUD Concept Plan) • B. Vacation of draina•e easement along Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Edenvale Page 614 Industrial Park (Resolution No. 79-53) V. REPORTS OF AOVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Request from the Development Commission for a Joint meeting with the Council for April 11, 1979 B. Request from the Planning Commission for a Joint meetning with the Council for ADril 2 or April 16, 1979 Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,March 20, 1979 VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 79-52 apprnving the Environmental Health Services Page 676 Contract with Hennepin County . VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council members 'f B. Report of City Manager 1. Amendment to Personnel Resolgi•on No. 1006 (continued from Page 617 March 6, 1979 Council meeting 2. Amendmen' to Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Page 625 Council Operati0001 BYlewS 3. Building permit fee for 6OOn Prairie High School building C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Senior Citizen Center Plan approval Page 529 2. Topview Park Page f --- E. Report of City Engineer • 1. Final plat approval for Hi.pp's Mitchell Heights 4th Page 635 Addition (Resolution No. 19-66), and .aopro 1 of developer's agreement 2. Finel plat approval for Ridgewood Nest (Resolution,9p. Page 646 79-56) 3. Proposed Hennepin County Transportation System Page 649 4. Connection to Metropolitan W ste Control Comm{ sign i to elrtor Page 668 sewer for Ridgewood WeWest Addition {Resolution . 7 5. RLS Approval for Golf Vista Page.684 F. Report of Finance Director I. Payment of Claims Nos. 3500 - 3674 Page 672 VIII. NEW BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT. , • UNAPPROVED MINUTES !DEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1979 7:30 PM, CITY HALL _ COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; Planning Director Chris Enger; City Engineer Carl Juilie; and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION: City'Manager Roger Ulstad PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members present. • I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER I;Ens OF BUSINESS The following items were requested to be added to the agenda under the "New • Business" category: A. Request from the Human Rights & Services Commission for a Joint • • Work Session with the Council B. Discussion on County Road 18 and Anderson Lakes Parkway C. Cutting down on material submitted to Council in the Council packets MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES OF THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PARKSt RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING HELD THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 19779 is Under "Commission Members Absent:" on the first page, strike "Robert Kruell". .MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes of the February 8. 1979 Joint City Council/Parks. Recreation & Natural Resources Commission meeting as amended and published. Notion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List Shady for approvalHighway B. Commercial Offict Public e and multiplekfam©lyouses on Pa 100acre site bD H. Gustafson for March 20, 1979 C. Receive 100% etition for improvements in Shady Oak Industrial Park, I.C. 81-344 (Resolution No. 79-42�) D. Set hearing date to vacate storm sewer easement in Edenvale Industrial Park (Resolution No. 79-43) • Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,February 20, 1979 III. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) E. Final plat approval 'for Menard's Addition (Resolution No. 79-41) F. RLS approval .for ear Mil Search Corporation {' MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve items A - F on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. IV. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS • No reports. V. PETITIONS,O REQUESTS & COMMtNICATIONS A preliminary pplatt by r13d N acres N 'zoned RM 6.5 Mitchell duplex Addition.ghts Fourth le (58 units) The site is located in the southwest corner of Tamarack Trail and Mitchell Road (Resolution No. 79-21) Continued from February 6, 1979 Council meeting. Don Sorensen, legal counsel for Mr, Kipp, asked the Council to keep in mind that this is a fairly difficult parcel to work with Abe to the shape, topography and surrounding land. Sorensen addressed the concerns of the Council at the February 6th Council meeting: 1) Length of the cul-de-sac - the proponents have attempted to see whether or not a connection of the 2 cul-de-sacs across the property to make it a "U" would be appropriate and possible. Such a connection results in an 8 - 8 l/2% grade which is not acceptable to the City Engineer. Secondarily it would lose three structures or • a total of 6 - 8 units and makes the project unfeasible as far as the developer i is concerned, plus it would put some double frontage lots which would front on two streets and would appear from a planning concept to be undesirable. The proponent tried to find out if having another cul-de-sac would work, making 3 cul-de-sacs. This did not work because the distance between the intersection would be less than 300 feet and does not result in desirable plans, and the location of the southerly cul-de-sac is fixed because of the improvements that were put in sometime ago when the City put in sewer and water. (Mr. Filippi of Filippi & Associates, Inc., outlined in detail the 3 cul-de-sac plan and why it would not work). 2) Retaining walls - these were originally placed on the property in response to a request from staff and Mr. Sorensen displayed a design layout for the Council to review along with a topo of the property. In discussing the retaining wall with the City Attorney and developer, Mr. Sorensen stated the developer is willing to contain in his Covenants a requirement upon the landowners who own the land adjoining the retaining walls, a positive duty to maintain those in a proper manner. This was done to accomplish compliance with the setback and rear yard elevation by the City. Sorensen then answered concerns of the citizens expressed at the February 6th Council meeting: 1) The Park - the developer cannot control much about the park. It is the adjoining landowners and City's situation to decide what to do. This development can aid in the acquisition of that park as this development • is going to pay the cash park fee and in addition dedication of land. 2) Physical appearance of the development and suggestion of berming being used - Sorensen stated that because of the topo view of this site which is extremely elevated, any berming would not hide or mask much of the development whatsoever from its view on Mitchell Road. if terming is to be done on the front of Mitchell Road, Sorensen felt it would be a safety hazard more than anything else. Any traffic trying to enter Mitchell Road with a large berm and the 4 driveways could not see the cars exiting until they are out in Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,February 20, 1979 A. Request by Richard Hipp, Hipp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition (continued) • • the roadway so it would not appear to be advisable. 3) Concept change - the reasons for the concept change are: a) townhouse financing is not available, b) market for townhouses is currently very poor, and c) duplexes are readily salable and duplexes provide a transition situation from the surrounding land users. 4) Density - the density has been changed. There is approximately a 26% density reduction and a ground cover reduction of about 30%. Sorensen stated the.Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission have unanimously rm.JAlABnded approval to the Council. Enger explained the Planning Staff spoke with Mr. Sorensen in trying to solve some of the concerns that were brought up by citizens surrounding the area and the Council at the February 6th Council meeting. The proponents do have a grade problem which is not unsolvable - it is possible to connect the two cul-de-sacs but it would be a long steep grade. Further, Enger stated, he has not had a chance to review the exact details of construction of the retaining walls and suggested due to the heighth of the retaining walls that perhaps the top tier of the retaining wall also include an extension as a fence for safety. The grading with connection to the cul-de-sac is possible, although probably not desirable from a tuw„graphic standpoint. There are other altwrdatives available, but each one of them would probably lose units. The proponents wish to pursue the request as presented. Osterholt felt two main objections in the plat and the alternate shown are the road layout and safety. Further he does not feel the extensive cul-de-sac or the alternate with 3 cul-de-sacs presents an attractive solution to the problem. Osterholt stated the matter calls for either a new plat or a restudy of the old one to eliminate the long cul-de-sac and connecting of those two in some manner, and also some action with the fencing at the dangerous portions of the retaining walls where the grades are severe so somebody doesn't injure themselves. Sorensen asked Mr.Hipp if he would be willing to provide fencing for the retaining walls. Mr. Hipp replied he has'every intention to do so. Jim Gratz, 8343 Mitchell Road, stated double cul-de-sacs will require additional fire, public safety and snow removal costs, no guarantee that the maintenance will be carried out on the retaning walls, does not feel single garages will be sufficient for the homes, and that this type of housing isn't what the people in the neighborhood want for a progressive community. i. Darcy Peterson, 8357 Mitchell Road, questioned who is going to be liable for the buyers that are not in there now, i.e., for erosion of the retaining: wall, drainage, or any problems that come from up above. Sorensen replied: 1) the responsibility for maintaining the property until the time it is sold is the responsibility of the present owner, Hipp's Construction, and 2) he doesn't know of any way to insure this other than by Covenants and Restrictions and • responsibility for lateral land support which is part of the common law of • the State of Minnesota. Mr. Peterson further spoke to the traffic problems on Mitchell Road which will ' be made greater with the duplexes "T" driveways exiting out on to Mitchell Road. However, Peterson, stated his two main interests are the park and preservation of the remaining corner which is still vacant. r`. Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,February 20, 1979 A. Request by Richard Hipp, Hipp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition (continued) • Mary Ann Toner, who lives on Hiawatha Avenue directly behind where the first ' cul-de-sac is proposed, explained she would prefer single family dwellings as there are plenty of townhouses and she doesn't care for the designs of the duplexes proposed. Further Mrs. loner stated she feels the proposal will lower the property values. Fred Baumann, 10805 Valley View Road, spoke in favor of the proposal as being appropriate land use, but yet not as high in density as originally planned. Baumann commented the project as planned allows two homes and keeps the price down so it is affordable housing, but yet quality housing. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to continue the request from Richard Hipp to the March 6th Council meeting to permit a review of the street alignments, redesign for potential loop street, setback question from the rear lot linesrand modification of the retaining wall problem. Motion carried unanimously. B. Request from Tim Eller CentexHomes, for a 60-day extension on his • developer's agreement for Ridgewood West Subdivision Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to grant the request of Tim Eller, Centex Homes, for a 60-day extension on his developer's agreement for Ridgewood West Subdivision. Motion carried unanimously. C. Request for reduction of special assessments on Lot 10, Block 2, Edenview 2nd, from Larry Keller Mr. Keller requested the Council consider reducing the assessments on Lot 10, Block 2, Edenview 2nd, to the price when they were originally deferred (1973), and adding to the original assessments a compounded interest for each delinquent year. (Communication from Mr. Keller dated • 2/14/79 attached as part of minutes). Osterholt asked if Staff had a recommendation. City Manager Ulstad replied Staff's recommendation would be the Council not consider granting a deferment of this type because there are other properties that have similar problems. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to move denial of the request from Mr. Keller for reduction in special assessments on Lot 10, Block 2, Edenview 2nd. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Keller requested that his realtor, Mr. Hallman, speak on his behalf. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Pauly, to reconsider the previous motion allowing Mr. Keller to have his realtor speak on his behalf. Motion carried unanimously. Jim Hallman, Edina Realty, spoke in favor of Mr. Keller's request, noting that any area that has possible flood problems should reflect it in the price, and prices should be substantially less than land in a high or dry area. Fenzel explained it is not the choice of the City to set property values, it is the free market which determines the value of property in reflection of all of the given circumstances which might affect that value. That includes the degree of buildability of a given parcel of land. He does not feel the City is in a role or a position to make or not make that kind of a decision, it is • something between the seller and the potential buyer. Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,February 20, 1979 C. Request for reduction of special assessments on Lot 10, Block 2, Edenview 2nd, from Larry Keller (continued) MOTION: Osterholt moved, second$ by Edstran, to move denial of the request from Mr. Keller for reduction in special assessments on Lot 10, Block 2, Edenview 2nd. Motion carried unanimously. VI. ORDINANCES b RESOLUTIONS • A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 293, rezoning from Rural to RN 2.5 for Parkview Apartments and approval of developer s agreement City Planner Enger explained this is a 2nd Reading for Parkview Apartments, the 1st Reading being given in 1975. Subsequent to that time the City has drafted a new developer's agreement based on the plans now before the Council. Enger spoke to the amendments in the developer's agreement stating that the proponents are in agreement with the amendments, and introduced Mr. Jan Susee, the ultimate builder of the apartment project. Mr. Susee stated the way the project is presently structured is a FHA Loan, and he would be in partnership with Eden Land Corporation during the construc- tion phase, after which time Eden Land would disappear from the ownership picture. • Penzel asked City Attorney Pauly to speak to the idea of cross easements and how those might be affected by conversion to condominiums. Pauly • responded if the cross easements are given and filed against the property, they will run with the property. Even though the property would be conceivably split up in the future, those easements would still be effective. If they go into a condominium arrangement, that would not have to come back before the Council for approval. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 293, rezoning from Rural to RM 2.5 for Parkview Apartments (Burning Tree). Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the developer's . agreement as amended, the open space to be divided or proper cross easements provided to insure that the open space would be useable by both phase 1 and phase 2 of the project. Motion carried unanimously. B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-31, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 for Prairie test 7th Addition and developer's agreement • City Planner Enger went over amendments to the developer's agreement which have been worked out by City Attorney Pauly and Windsor Development Corporation's attorney. Jim Ostenson, Hustad Development Corporation, distributed additional changes the proponents are requesting in the developer's agreement MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the developer's agreement for Prairie East 7th Addition with changes requested by the proponents, with the exception that July 1, 1979 should be substituted in lieu of September 1, 1979 in item 8, and "building permits' should be left in item 9 rather than "occupancy permits". • 677 Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,February 20, 1979 B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-31 rezoning fro!!Rurl to RM 6.5 for Prairie East 7th Addition and developer's agreement (continued) City Attorney Pauly suggested adding new language to item 14, which will read as follows: "Owner shall delicate additional right-of-way for that part of County Road 18 abutting Prairie East 7th, 8th and 9th, which will result in said right-of-way being 60 feet wide as measured from center line of County Road 18 westerly thereof." Council members agreed to this addition in the developer's agreement. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to amend the motion by striking "building permits" in item 9 and inserting "occupancy permits" as requested by the proponents. Edstrom, Redpath and Pauly voted "aye", Osterholt and Penzel voted "nay". Motion carried. Penzel requested on page 2, 6th paragraph, that the date be filled in where the blank appears. Council members agreed with this request. All Council members voted in favor of the developer's agreement as amended. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-31, rezoning from Rural to RN 6.5 for Prairie East 7th Addition. Motion carried unanimously. VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & MISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Appointments to the Citizens Advisory Commission on Cable TV Mayor Penzel reconmended the appointment of Mrs. Ismail Ismail to the Citizens Advisory Commission on Cable TV. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to appoint Mrs. Ismail Ismail to the Citizens Advisory Commission on Cable TV. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Airport runway extension Edstrom reported on the public information meeting he attended a couple of weeks ago sponsored by the Metropolitan Airports Commission on the proposal to extend the southeasterly east/west runway Which was originally scheduled for about March 8. The date of March 8th has been deferred to sometime in April because it is taking longer to develop the environmental impact assessment than.they had originally anticipated. Edstrom suggested the Council monitor this very closely and that this item be placed on the agenda as soon as more information is available. Enger commented he expects the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission will be forthcoming with a recommendation. Council requested to be notified when meetings of the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission are being held. . No action necessary. S'17 • Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,February 20, 1979 3. 1 Appointment to the Planning Commission to fill an unexpired term to 2/28/81• r' Penzel placed the name of Virginia Gartner into nomination to fill the unexpired term on the Plannipg Commission to 2/28/81. Edstrom placed the name of Fred Baumann into nomination. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, that nominations be closed. Motion carried unanimously. Upon tabulation of ballots, Virginia Gartner was selected to fill the unexpired term on the Planning Commission to 2/28/81. 4. Status of Highway #212 Councilwoman Pauly reported on the meeting of the Highway #212 Task Force held February 14, 1979 at the Chaska City Hall. Paul r rev: mended sending individual letters to Governor Quiet Senators Ourere r and Boschwitz, Congressman Frenzel, State Representative Ewald and Senator John Keefe, and form letters to the rest of our Congressional delegation and to the legislators in the #212 army plus a different form letter to the rest of the legislators. Four points that should be brought out, Pauly commented, should be as follows: I) safety - use of our own Public Safety Department for what is mainly through traffic; 2) southwest is the only area in and out of the area without a four-lane highway; 3) Highway Department's historical position and promise to build Highway #212, and 4) development pressure. Penzel requested that letters be drafted by Staff for Coil's review. Fred Baumann, 10805 Valley View Road, commented if community meetings are going to be held regarding Highway #212, that they be held in September rather than in August. B. Report of City Manager No report. C. Report of City Attorney No report. D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Eden Prairie Stables Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated 2/15/79, recommending that the Eden Prairie Stables be closed at the end of February and that the City advertise for a new leases. Lam #„ further pointed out he has contacted the Vo-Tech as they have started a stable management program and are now using Maikerson Stables. There might be a possibility for Vo-Tech to use Eden Prairie Stables and Mr. Lambert will be meeting with the person in charge for program development for all the Vo-Techs to pursue this possibility. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Penzel, to authorize Staff to close the Eden Prairie Stables the end of February and advertise for a new leasee. Motion carried unanimously. 5 Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,February 20, 1979 E. Report of City Engineer 1. Consider bids for quicklime P; MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to award the bid for quicklime to the lowest responsible bidder, Cutler-Magner, Co., in the amount of $55.70 per ton + fuel clause. Roll. Call Vote: Osterholt, Redpath, Edstrom, Pauly and Penzei voted "aye". Motion • carried unanimously. 2. Consider bids for dump truck MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to award the bid .for one 27,500 GVW truck cab and chasis with a diesel engine to Boyer Ford Trucks in the amount of 519,140.46,as reconniended by City Engineer in memo dated February 15, 1979. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Pauly, Edstrom, Redpath and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 3. Final plat approval for Hipp's Mitchell Heights 4th Addition '(Resolution No. 79-32) MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom,,-to continue the final -- plat approval for Hipp's Mitchell Heights 4th Addition to the March 6, 1979 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Release of 10% retainage - HNTB • MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the release of the let retainage to HNTB (Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff). Roll Call Vote: Redpath, Osterholt, Edstrom, Pauly and Penzel voted. "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 5. Change Order #1, I.C. 51-326, Dell Road project MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, tb refer this item to the City Attorney for his advice on 1) whether this is the - appropriate course of action to take and 2) whether there is any recourse to the City in connection to this matter. Motion carried unanimously. Penzel recommended giving the contractor the go ahead on the Change Order and settle who is going to pay for it. Council members agreed with this procedure. F. Report of Finance Director 1. Payment of Claims Nos. 3151 - 3351 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve Payment of Claims Nos. 3151 - 3351. Roll Call Vote: Redpath, Osterholt, Edstrom, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Request from the Human Rights & Services ComniSsi-on for a Joint Work Session with the Council City Manager Ulstad explained he-will find out what the-Human Rights 4 Services. Coinnission wishes to meet with the Council en, and elsa a date. • • • • Council Minutes - 9 - TBes.,February,2Q. 1970 B. Discussion on County Road IS and erson t ee.larbsay City Engineer Jullie explained he met today With Hennepilh County and • Bloomingtonofficials regarding the i rs tion improvements gatCounty Road • 18 and Anderson Lakes Farb/ay.. Jullie cad apparently.:glroring r, is not prepared to approve the intersection plantas theme.ly spin:•County at this time. Further that Bloomington Is stronglys ing w look-toward reserving sufficient right-of-way in terms of the iontrangw plans for Counts Road 18. • City Planner Eager noted the City has-,rived a Cfegy Of Mennonite C, nty's proposed transportation plan far Ilia.arid the does show in the t System an intermediary arterial on-County-R which it aw fre iy., and they, dent 40,t8X1 trips per day on brat w E r slated Ire.ralT� iJ ' • , t litan Council transportationtt an'd they leave info him atgairrr!°as they did last year when ttrer i reviewing crux puidhr• lan, tit t .Count'y • is really in contradiction tie the Met palitnnr il's timugh on County 18, and that Eden Prairie's guide 'plan teas pr sed :showing Coin'' R 18 as a minor arterial is what 7lietineriel fan 3r1 O terholt reiterated.Eden•Prai ii€ h S:.a positionittOntentatint.7.941407,7•,,' plan showing County Read 1B as a grin 'ar#aerlaT and Cif i sold o the tounty and express our-,pos tion, ►Ai=-tot 1• ' Connnissioners, and point out the M .ons rc Fr"9l .9..woul d i lee:to t .... left as a mirror arterial., Osterholt t further'sugge d:Itaf advise. Metropolitan Council when we take our guide.p141n in that this::'.is a: .n . important part of that guide plan. Edstrom asked how we should-peed ncm 1u)1'te f 11 .r shoal g+:• lea tg the County and say this is what our i,nennt • in at the present intersection. . C. Cutting down on material submitted to Council In thatnitiel..packets•„ Council suggested that a list 6e made up. of types of It Lire:net included in the Council packets and also in the ofor Your Infonration°:, and t • Council members indicate which i `:they oil: .like'to receive and'*kith items they do not feel are important. IX. ADJOURNMENT • MOTION: 0.sterholt moved, seconded by 9edpath, to adjourn the Council marling•at 10:45 PM. Motion carried unanimously. • • . „.• , . . ,. .• . . . • • • • . • •. . . . , . ... . •, • -• .. - ' ' • - . . . . ..-_. ... . • - - • "- • - . --- . _., . .- .. , . • - — .. _ , ... . ,, . . . ..... .. .... . , . . ' . . . . ' . ... . !.. • - • t - -. .. .-. Feb. 144 1979- • . • •- . . .. . .. . . , . . . FEB 151971 .. . . , • . •• . beer City CouncU of Eden Prairie, , . .. • . . . • - .., ....... It is the desire of my vitt and I to live in seta',seats; •that-00e Mil, ent 04 tilt 411,001-atitti,Or t114_,0ttl$04V.g011 purchased a piece of property,conting , .:• ., teat, having plane to build. NOW4Vert, me.have.enceiatired a.trenbliml.IM iltatds". . . , .. • -to the building of our home, and ate IX iTeed,41 your ii4,111:Iii-01-1-4.1041341X. • , . , „, , , . . . This ie lt04 the situation stands. The lez.leargarthased-(S,,titilt.icauter'0 - . , . . . South.land Drive and Creekvies Lanel i-a is tated.ettitelOtti.e....,,,,"idadVaWati•41.0.,,,.:. . . ' , ..- •-,,. .-':, -..- fill before any,attempt to build a home amild.fia,;Ontialay.-las--1**42,111-1411-• . ,,.. ,. .. ,2,.• ... .,,:.; an endeavor would he in the 4501304o° te -570004=0,64•-, the - back sgsgliml,gaol of, 4,1.1.,...baglifilWia-*be COItt*S-V-Ont:CO-.. - ; 4 at to this added expense it is unlikely seven year delinquency period a beck taradatild4141.001,1;10#101-.0 ,;;.10WW,-.4*/*:,..'„.-; .:, •• '...,.: ..,,, -,,,,,,,-...., .--.: their taxes since.19-75) at that time Toieu-li. .ifteltie 3140,1d.li.--1*-04011,., "I"'-.1-1:!"-. • ' - .' ,. -.;'-:',,..':-• ."'•': lot that it non-buildable. lie would like tek;bald-pa-Oa lot Iit'S-riklutiattg.,,..,., le, ..,,, •• - --.., ,,-,,,,,.,.„,,, ,..,, iitoe, aud /to surathet Eden Prairie VxMl-hirtsfflAt fx0i-th*.0!**4.# 4-"rw': home, but bow can this situation be soivedt . , . , . : ,,,,, -..,!, •..., ..., .. . ... . What I woad like the city covert*" t0-0004144X-..54,4,11, _,14-1.:-.--10#41.4:-. 1414 ilitt,:z.: asiessmenr.s to the prise when they sere ori-giaelly•lefearad( ,1),:ilindS ;':, - ,.-..,....-...--,.„ .r..,.,,,.....,....,::,,,,. .. . to the original assessments a compounded intaraet let. itatkdOWIOtitt:flear,.4.'..• .'.-. ,-,,•:,-,- ..- .,... ; .", :".:' ',. (The current assessments Osumd.at approximatell Iflitn°40)- .:-. . . . .. -."---,f': .,, -.',-- ,,'..',.-..;•. ,:. .. , . ,. , ,, , t, _:.,.•. - If the City Council mould act on the afore mentianied-'0% ...I * .., ..... .. . enhance the possibility'of our building po that Yert4"0", _Ur 404,.-1-f 130C4".+. . r- .. .,, „ -,- , 2,. is unlikely that we or anyone else mould be able to build...'imi the situatiatc• • . . .„. . ,-, , ...-.: . .. . •• , stands. . . Thankyou for your time in considering this matter. I alt Aszionillit- . - '. . . .,• . . awaiting your decision. . , .. . — Siaatrelts • . • .• - • • ' . , . Larry Weller .,..',• . , -,.-: 77.0g Pent Ave. Wilt liOi 4 '- - • -, ziebilald JN 5S42 _ . . . , . . . . - • - .: . ... , . . - . . • ' • . .. , .. . . . . . .., . . . '- - • . - . ':-.. •• -.•:-.'... '," f.;Yr.,:,. -.:-., ,,',. .,--.• '"." ':'•-.4.;,, . ,- ',..i, - • , . , „, • ,: ,„..,,, , .. .,..---.1-.-;;,-....-,: - •,----,,,-."-',..-'7.. . , • .--.,-..-. , . - ........ -.,.,.. :,,,,,,.,,,....:;,,-.1,..:4,,,,.,.---.,---,,,.."1:-.:,-,-.7....;',--Z;•.,,;.::.-=7::":7--,2•",i'' ... •',:',..; . . . ......L.,-...:._,-..;.:;:..,..:.:.:7-..,---...-,-.,-..,.,. .,-;,.:_:...T.:-,..1•,tir.24,-7?--,-2,--;.....;"1.--,,,,,": -"," '-:':.'"-;':::',, UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 1979 7:30 PM, CITY HALL t` COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrmn, Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger; City Engineer Carl Jullie; Finance Director John Frane, and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION: Councilman Dave Osterholt PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members present. I. AWARD OF CERTIFICATE OF MERIT TO OFFICER STEVE GEIGER FROM PRESID , AND AWARD OF CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION TO OANIEL LOB•STEIN• FROM THE MERIICA RED CROSS Ms. Vickerman, representing the American Red Cross, presented the Certificate of Merit Award to Officer Steve Geiger from President Carter, and the Certificate of Appreciation Award to Daniel Lobstein from the American Red Cross, for saving the life of Heidi Cady. Mayor Penzel expressed sincere thanks and commendation to Officer Geiger and Daniel Lobstein on behalf of the City Council and the citizens of Eden Prairie. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following item was requested to be added to the Council Agenda as item IX. A. 3: Hazardous Waste meeting before the Legislature'. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. III. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 1979 Pg. 11, 4th para., 8th line, strike language "that the water in the mini-park be made more difficult for youngsters to get into" and insert in lieu thereof: "that the tot lot be separated as much as possible from the pending area". • MOTION: Dsterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the minutes of the February 6, 1979 Council meeting as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Request to set a Public Hearing for rezoning from Rural to R1 13.6 for Cardinal Creek for April 3, 1979 B. Request to set a Public Hearing for rezonins of Outlot A, Crestwood 73. by Mr. Dorenkemper and Mr. Wilson, for April 3., 1979 . 3 Council Minutes - 3 - Tues..March 6, 1979 A. Request by Richard Hipp, Hipp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition (continued) Mr. Filippi of Filippi & Associates, Inc., representing Mr. Hipp, spoke to the revised plat dated March 2, 1979. Mr. Filippi along with Don Sorensen, legal counsel for Mr. Hipp, answered questions of Council members. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 79-21,. approving the preliminary plat for Hipp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition as per revised plat dated March 2, 1979, consisting of 28 lots (56 units). and directed staff to modify tint developer's agreement to include changes as outlined in the revised plat,and that the retaining walls are to be 5 feet off the lot line and a fence or dense plantings be included on top of the retaining walls. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution Nq. 79-50, requesting the Minnesota Department of Transportation to put imp o additional manpower, consult assistance and effort it the 212, pro ect Mayor Penzel requested that Congressman Frenzei's name be added to the list to receive a copy of Resolution Mo. 79-50 if adopted, and also Senators, Durenberger and Boschwitz. Amendments were made in Resolution No. 79-50 as follows: 1st WHEREAS clause, 1st line, add "south and" before "crest and in the 3rd WHEREAS clause, 1st line, strike the language after "resolution" and all of the 2nd line. Pauly stated she thought the Council should sign and send this resolution • on,but also felt individual letters should also be sent as discussed at the February 20th Council meeting. Penzel suggested including the resolution as a supporting piece of evidence along withthe letters. Council members agreed. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 79-SO as amended, requesting the Minnesota Department of Transportation to put additional manpower, consulting assistance and effort into the 212 project. Motion carried unanimously. IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & CQhMISSIONS s" A. Reports of Council members r: 1. Appointments to the Citizens Advisory Commission on Cable TV Mayor Fenzel recommended the appointment of Larry Van Meter to the t:.r Citizens Advisory Commission on Cable TV, MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to appoint Larry Van Meter to the Citizens Advisory Commission on Cable TV ds recommended by Mayor Fenzel, Notion carried unanimously, • j. 2. Appointment of Council Representative to the CATV Study Conlsissfien MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to appoint Councilman Redpath to serve as the Council's Representative to the CATV Study Commission. Motion carried unanimously: to Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,March 6, 1979 3. Hazardous Waste meeting before the Legislature Councilman Edstrom volunteered to attend the Hazardous Waste meeting before the Legislature on March 13, 1979. B. Report of City Manager 1. Bill from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission City Manager Ulstad stated back in the early part of 1976 he requested of the Council some outside consulting service to develop a report that we could use in our reviewing of an existing bill from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission stating what the City owes. City Engineer Jullie explained the report reviewed different responsible methods that could be used by the MWCC to compute our reserve capacity charge instead of the method that they are using. The other method resulted in charges to the City, the lowest one would have been $122,000.00 using a variation of the sac method, up to $883,000.00 which would be the MtiCC method, except using the most current 1-letropolitan Council population projections. The Metropolitan Baste Control Commission is suggesting our bill is $1,219,000.00 plus in trrebt. The basic fallacy we have tried to point out to the *CC staff is that they did not include the total service area when splitting the cost, they-only spread the cost to the communities that had pipe in place. The'MWCC countered by saying that was the direction from the legislation that created the sewer district, and that the MACC has the power to levy the charges in that manner. After reading the legislation it says they ma do it that way, it doesn't say they have to do it that way. If they charged taking into account the whole service area, our charges would be 6594,000.00 instead they are saying $1,219,000.00. Jullie commented City staff went over all the various methods and didn't get too far with the MUCC. Jullie suggested paying an add-on to the sac charge, all connections to the sewer system must pay a surcharge of $75.00 starting in the first repayment year to $215.00 in the last year, providing a total repayment of $1,665,000.00. The City has yet to go before the MWCC for their concurrence, but feel the MWCC's staff is prepared to accept this proposal. Ulstad noted the MWCC is stating the City owes $1,643,000.00 as of 1977. The City is proposing a payment over the next 26 years that will amount to $1,665,000.00, which is about the same amount money that we owe. It is the same dollars spread over 26 years and cheaper dollars when you get out 26 years, which is free of any additional interest charges. Ulstad feels we cannot negotiate any further, short of just saying that we do not feel the bill is justifiable. City Attorney Pauly stated the present proposal before the Council has spread the payments out to 26 years at 1,666,000.00, so there appears to be a substantial reduction from the 1976 proposal. MOTION: Redpath moved to direct staff to approach the MWCC and request acceptance of the repayment schedule as outlined in letter of May 23, 1978. Motion died for lack of a second. MOTItNf: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to refer this matter to the City Attorney for a report and opinion at a future Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. • Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,March 6, 1979 [ 2. Amendment to Personnel Resolution No. 1088 Mayor Penzel stated he would like to see some cross reference from communities of our size as to the kinds of policies presently in force, and also some cross reference from the private sector, i.e., Rosemount, NTS and Eaton Char Lynn. City Manager Ulstad explained he put this item on the agenda for discussion purposes realizing there was not any back-up material included. As requested, Mr. Ulstad commented he will prepare the information and bring this item before the Council at the March 20th Council meeting. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to receive the information to-date and place the amendment to the Personnel Resolution on the March 20, 1979 Council agenda. Motion carried unanimously. C. Report of City Attorney No report. D. Report of City Engineer 1. Right-of-entry agreement for Dell Road project. I.CC 51-326 • City Engineer Jullie spoke to the right-of-entry agreement and recommended the Council consider approval of same. City Attorney Pauly commented it is the obligation of the City to do that work under the settlement with Mr. Pautz. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom., to approve the right-of-entry agreement for Dell Road project, I.C. 51-326. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Discuss MCA transportation plan Penzel referred to memo from City Engineer Juliie dated March 20 1979, and asked if Council members had any questions, Osterholt stated he would like Staff to tell the Council how much of the net City share is State Aid and how much is General Levy, Ernie explained he has the figures but not readily available at the present time, Osterholt requested these figures be supplied to Council members, Penzel suggested authorizing Staff to prepare a feasiblity report and take a closer look at the numbers, and at that point once the feasibility report has been accomplished make a determination as to how to,proceedd as far as the total project is concerned - whether in yearly intervals or as a package. Penzel personally feels there is some urgency to this, and there is a real benefit from having the feasibility report in hand, The precise location is becoming more and more fixed, and even if the Council decided not to do the whole package the information will be of value although the dollar figures may have to be adjusted, • 6781 . . ...„ .... ..... „,.„. ,. . .. ... ., . - . . . , . ... . . . . • . ., , • •: , * • „. . . 1 • • , . .. . , . • . - Council Nitrates . • - 6 - Tues.,,Narch 6, 1319.• .. • . ....... _ .-, .. .. . • •• ., . .. • - . 2. Discuss NcA transportation.trjAil .keetiffeed) . . • Ulstad explained Steff•want'through.the who're PreCeder*With the• " "I ' property owners in the WA meet-1*On 6 different occaStetti. the concerns was the 3500,007-Per-acre. -for thelrest'Pert ell'ef the" - . property owners are in-emcee With thet- there-will:irk ill'PrOPerg__ ••crener-- ' or two tryst will appear irefofetle.,Countil and .11quest4 I aine•**I • the $500,00. Ulstad coenortite111-00.-reY did Steff-ASSille,thee'theY were " • • • going to get relief. The prorierty•brifterS'are'noddliWtheft heat" ' . • -. . in approval of all the rietef•the *tete adereelee-Ah14014",jullitil•Mholot. . ' including dropping of the lawsuit..... ... .' • • • • ' .."•• . ..,. . • Knorr; itedpath moved, seconded by heterkelti•te-eht-herflk Staff ti: _..*" - ' •:- prepare a feasibilitY t‘eport_zer thrirrephsed:irtgrieveriverf,tt,?-3,103i4NIthervie:": •''',' , • the expenditure of'34-0200-ahl to=he paid""to Bather,-',Ili IlifrOSV,:lleTtfeld;.Illf,.. . to make plan revisions fOr_liejettlifii-"S. ..lbali...CalT.Ziroter'.,116006th:;,Pa-ti . • " ••• - .•-; Osterholt, Edstrma, Pauly aatt, zi'V,atited also; ..)rotioit_.1morieC--• - r•'•••' " '-' . . • • unarrImeusly. , • .. ,.. • . . • .• ..„• •• ,. .... .. . . . ... .•• - • — .• . . • • - ••,- - ':, •-• 1. Payment of Claims•Ros, 3362-7 Ipt. .. .•.• ,,, ' . '- .,• .--.'.-.•••.,. - •• -.. ..';'..J.:,;. -::-..-.- ‘ ,. ,... .. . . ... • ., • - - .:- .. • . - - - . -._,.. "."...,,— ..:„..'. ' -- --- )131101i: Edstrvm mrniedo" seconded-1v-11000021l .114INITileir"Paxifen./.J'er-` • -•• '•-'''',". '.7, Claims Nos. 3352 -"3507, " Roll Cala..letel. tostgolf-Rigipathi';:istirtAtilti.:.:-....,-..,,...:1,,l'i.1," .1, Pauly and Penzel voted ii•aye. Notintereted.UnerrinirPriiii,"'•',... ' •-.••• - ''''- -"'"••••-•,•••,, ' ''" •• - ' ' - .•," •- •-•',Ir....2, •.":. X. NEW BUSINESS• . ., ..... .. .... .,. .. .... ...• -.• -• . , No new business. . .. XLADJOURtiliEtff , , ,,,, „... • ,. • . NOTIOti: Redpath moved, seconded by•OsterholtAii-ediloorn'the-meeting et eigh".---s,..',•":"...":"-,- otion carried unanimously. . . . . . „ . , ., . • . . . .,. . .. . . . . „ • . , . . . . . ...,„ .„ • • - • . • . . , . • . , . . . • . . • . . .. , . . , .., . ., .... .,.. . ... . ... .. . " " . . , •. . . , • ., , • . .•: . . , .• . .. . ...., _ • - - • .... . . . . • - --• . . , ,, ,,..,,,:„.„,,,,:.:,.....,,,,,.2 ,,,,,-",......4%. i•:.::...........:'.-:::,,,,::-,:-'''' ` -••••.' • ..94. . -.,... ... .: . , ,.,,,:,,,,,,,:.:,.....,-,..,-..„--.. 7-.7.,,.,-..,..-.;,.-:-..7,,,,:•-.2::-. -..---. • COST Si6't '- (For Interceptor Reserved Capacity Allocation Only) • • For Detailed : Calculations 1971 Reserved 1972 Reserved Combined 1971,12 Method of See Appendix Capacity, Capacity ROSlifvcit Capacity Allocation Page 1 Allocation.. .Allocation Allocation NNCC Method, except using most Uurroot Metro Council popu- A-1 • lotion projections A-2 $462,040 421,32D ,968. MCC Method, except using old papule- • tion projections spread over total area of sewer ser- A-3' . vice area 94 A-4 $258,223 1239,912 $138,135 • .MWCC Method., except Musing mounci polcurro etroTation projections spread over total area of sewer ser- A-5 vice area 94 A-6 .$307,646 , • Original Southwest Sanitary Sewer District Method A-7 S 87,466 $ 91047 413 N1MICC "'SAC' Method currently in use • (Note that this also includes A-8 $31,350 $91,. 00 $1 2,6SQ treatment works rese}reserved capa-• MNCC Method being A-9 disputed by A-l0 Eden Prairie A-11 $682,022 tia7,161 $1,24011 Note: Total charges paid MCC in 1975= $192,115.33 • • • • • • . 3 - . - , • • • . • . • • • • CITY OP EDEN PRA1BIE • CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST • March 20, 1979 CONTRACTOR (Multi-family $ Crum.) TOOD ESTABL/SHMENT - Type A Design Management Conat. *wintry Kitchen Auden, Inc. Seaway Homes, Inc. TOM ESTAMISHMENT - Type B CONYMOTOR (X 9 2 Family) Prairie Hotel Air Seal Co. ' Crest Investment Corp. Durabilt Associates, Inc. Steven lox Ambert L. Gustafson Stephen Longman Builders • _ Cartel Construction Co. Patron Builders • Urban unit PLUMBING Atkims'Plumbing & Heating • • Budget Plumbing fi Heating Tom Donahue Plumbing & Heating Hoff Plumbing Nieman Plumbing & Heating HEATING'fi'VENTILAMING • Atkins Plumbing & Heating Northeast Sheet Metal GAS FITTER Northeast Sheet Metal SCAVENGER - Ahh Scavenger • These 14..anaoe have been approved by the department bead rasponaiblit for the licensed activity. iaigAta- 0.4.111Atelt4k•il'A • Rebecca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk • 690 • •March 20. 2979 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, NINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 79-54 RESOLUTION SETTING HEARING FOR VACATING A PORTION OF W. 74TH ST. IN NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION • WHEREAS. it is proposed to vacate a portion of W. 74th St. which is no longer needed and which is legally described as follows: A 70 foot easement for roadway purposes over end across the following described property: That part of the West 500.0 feet of the East 1275.0 feet- of the North Half of the Noortheast Quarter of the Southeast • Quarter of Section 12, Township 116, Range. 22. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, thence North 2 degrees 33 minutes 24 seconds West (assumed bearing) along the East line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, a diStArteT of 6.28 feet; thence North 86 degrees 38 mi nyttect 28 seconds West parallel with the North line of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 750.0 feet; thence Southwesterly a distance of 290.83 feet along a curve concave to the Southeast, said curve having a radius of 477.46 feet and a central angle of 34 degrees 54 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 58 degrees 27 minutes 32 seconds West a distance of 219.00 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 290.83. feet along a curve concave to the North, said curve having a radius of 477.46 feet and a central angle of 34 degrees 84 minutes 00 seconds and there terminating. 59 • !Kiri, THEREFORE, DE IT ItEt01.11ED tof the Eden Prairie City Cosalcil as follows: I. A th hearing snail ne halo on the Iftb dayor:priT, 19;167te,1at the Edon Prairie Citr CEMS 'ger rotetien of said elsOnent. ice Of euCh e troller Itag : thed sat losIzeti 2. TheheariCtnety Clerk as requti*d by giv 1110 (2**Oki':1,aim k101 s notice.) filOPTED by the Eden Preivie City Council VII ir I Futiv ATTEST: SEAL • John D. rrarte, Clerk • • • • ' • • • ^ . 612- • ' . . . . 4 - March 20T 1,979 - _ . • ',. MT OF EllEtillallat - - • - • • • - HENNEP111•coutrrt 4411110307A- 1. geSOLOTIOUNO.,. 19,4- 56 . L_ . A RESOLOTION APPROVING,FINAL'RAY OF EDER ITIEkIDTE CENTER MO NOITTION I , ol *taw sub-' WHEREAS. the plat Of !dew Prattle fehttr. :;id.. ASIifi00,,t4.-.t*:emir note. . . • rated in none eauiren for piettilifiltoRLUMOr And;P ? Code a r r . • of the litheisolia Statutes ArikaIT.11; idinle hot: . been,duly had thereunder, and liffif.a slid plat it..1O411,1-tbOO; OZ.0 41A., ifileRt1?),tk,th;..!_,Clif',..1111Ykr. .: and the 'reynlations tedirelteeTAtf-Airlatil Of the 3141.°..!r LT.-Ur'''"r- ' . : ordinances of the City of Eden PreMe. NOW, ?HEREFORE, BE TI int III itit,'eittg011ak!Orllit.,CM'OF, approval request tat Eine *aitttt00 ! ti4foi:,...c A. Plupoat li with the reombAblidatIOVPI the City' '.• Reporton this plat dated HbffAC- 5*,,, . . , B. That the City Clerk is hereby'directed. .:TA SupLivi' 1 -',,,beergf,,,Ii. _,,t4t:::.',..•-,.:,:'.:, .., copy of this Resolution In thcafACCO-ghC.- 1110r $%4;77,-, andfor Registrar TitlesfortieltAiiiiitlaiibirddAY, • 462.358. Subd. 3. • C. That the City Clerk is hereby:d4 . •r mit,'.1Atotisit4,_ izoitem.totifitiet-.. ::: .,.... ... . copy of this Resolution Ionto tht otaiii above named plat- . ., ,. ... • hill"d" thratlied talmostule( ...... the Mayor and City adlidger.we '4it,--, .0,.........16 won C. Thatthcr.xtificate of approval on,behalf V the'4,414:‘iminvil • compliance with the foregoing provisions . i ADOPTED by the City Council on • _ • • Votgacmii... tiviriAinurf . 1 , .., , . ATTEST: SEAL John Frane, Clerk . ,. ., . . .... . . • . .,. • 54:326 ..--, '.. '-''F,,,,.-...i-i.'4,::',H"'7,"....".';',2:::kr,.:,,'",,,2.rtl-?4., .,: a.: - •'''''*".".* ' '."..' :"---------"777. "*".•, ::.-.,:::, ':" 7.::'-'4,>":" '...:: • MDm ' TO: 71Syor Pante and iteMbert of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Meted, City manager FRON: CarlTlie, City Engineer . • - DATE: March 15, 1979 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Center 2nd.Pattie* On February 20, 1979, the City C004011 apprOVed a Registered Land Survey • for this property as requested by the btibeiski•Ottroltitteirth Corp. Upon attempting to record the 10 at 141v*Pirt to.i•lire-eitoery diSCOvere‘• that a portion of the property is "elsetlietl!-Tether them being an 'torrens.' Therefore, the RLS could net be recorded bectuvethe-tufuntr- will not accept an RLS if the property tnvetVed, is not completely • • torrens title. The final plat now submitted for approval accomplishes the same purgeSe, as the RLS and can be recored at the County Offices. , Rpronnond approval of the final plat of Eden Prairie 2nd Addition. CAM:kh . , -4 • ' - : • 9328 • - . . • . - •. . , ' • , •. March 20s 1919 -" •• • . • . . . • . . • . . . • •• • __ • ; • CITY OF [DEN PRAIRIE- • • • • . _ , . _ • tioianN-CONTY. nrNNEsoTA ..• . • • REsignenet. 7147 • . • . . • - • --- •• A RESOLUTION RPPROVINN.f113PL:115/1T-'.• • • • Of OLYNrIC WILLS FIFTH ADDITION . , " . WHEREAS, the plat of •r.014i1c-,:fitiliSIIM:AntittION::-.- sub- mitted In a Manner required fOr-blettiOglantr.?Under' the!din Pralrt Ordinance Cods and under thsoter,462. of the •.. . been duly had theleunder and • IMERMS;said pat is ill &1 eoects consst.nt-with the City plan and the regulations and Ilalattad:O#tFOI::*latERItf-TititMlaba*;,:efliiabeabas7.,-ROP.:::12:• - Oriiinabeet of the City Of Eden Pra1r1e . '27-I..: • • •-•••••H,.•,;',-- • NOW, THEREFORE. BE:IT RESOLVED BY THECITYCWNC'IL OP THE CITY OF 'Set PRAIRIE: • • -• • ••... • . A. flat approval remucti.for01‘* 'fi-"`iiii$:;:f"4:i11-4411ff:'1sAP.oreliecf upon compliance with the recomindekitni.:Wf-the #2Mgfav,•-•-•...,,. • Report on this plat dated NartkL4...TIR.71-:•-•.:,'. • • •-'•• . . B. That the City Clerk is hereby-d1reted to supply. a certified copy of this Resolution in the affiCig..4fith0.:46914fet;.:9f.f..910314!:•;.,:,.....-,,,- • . and/or Registrar of Titles for theiruse as required bY MM • 462.368s Saba. 3. .; ;.. . . C. That the City Clerk is hereby direcied*.to*tatigy,*IfIertitlet copy of this Resolution to the statOrsabi.14041444S.41oCtOS--;. • above named plat. • C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby outhoritette::Feel* the certificate of approval on behalf of the.414*.40nceil 4010m.: - . cOmpliance with the foregoing provisions. • . ADOPTED by the City Council on . , ...• • • • , itoltiang A. 01E04. . ATTEST: • SEAL • ' . • • • ' _ . - : . ..• John Franc, Clerk • . „ . , • • • 543 • • . . , r r • • • • LLt „ „ • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger UIstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: March 14, 1979 • • SUBJECT: OLYMPIC HILLS FIFTH ADDITION PROPOSAL: The developer, Olympic Hills Corporation, is requesting final plat appluval of Olympic Hills Fifth Addition. This is a 20 lot single family residential plat (R1-13:S) located north of Pioneer Trail and west of Olympic Hills Golf Course in Section 25. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved on June 7, 1978, per Council Resolution No. 78-100. Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on November 8, 1978. per Ordinance No. 78-28. The Developer's Agreement referred to withing this report was executed on November 8, 1978. Ownership of Outlots A and B will be retained by the Olympic Hills Corporation and are intended to be used as buffer areas. VARIANCES: No lot size or setback variances have been requested for this plat. A variance from Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Requirementf for the installation of utilities and streets are covered in the Developer's Agreement. Item #4 of the Developer's Agreement requires the cul-de-sac, at the terminus of Cleek Manor, to be "squared off." Approval of the pro- posed configuration by the City Planning Department will be necessary prior to release of the final plat. Item #6-d. of the Developer's Agreement requires an additional 17' of right-of-way dedication along Pioneer Trial (County Road`#1). Dedication of the additional right-of-way will be required prior to release of the final plat. • • 614 • • rlr deposit so cover the•fir year TTrr T'atfn as d-mai it $ of streetlighting' mill t iPed is ^ !-to i"Ua7 .. fiat-+pilrt. r 'i of'purchasing at 1 Instal it be'.paid - the divelepet' upon installation. ,straw '" EeTC � ` Plate' 11 if • loge."' a fe•e foor, v r ei "5 A a ie t tsr sare .i �e • ;, *; i ' ` ' tet•Ort item: , :i ding,l ua ai f t raeT,ps r oRe . rpprdie iee subh tO�Itfti1itirgn, to w1n9 i £ n 1 �1 F eipt tof'$ O. . 2, Receipt of-cash deposit for t�''lighting n ° of CdJ:kb March I4 Mr. Rodger tastad, Citp Eezeiger— Eden Prairie 8950, tt Prairie.Rd -` Elea Prairie, ER 5 w 'Hoar Mr. Ulataett of Idea Prairie a to Re.a ,o KetWag'r:4or the' mo d .; far the purpose of Your help in implementing r t id gr appreoiated. �„,,� C.!oun'1,tri e- ' till 1 0L +• " 4 �lA � ,' � r i30 saint @°PCnc swv.1 1 lU 'lilKBiti.,PA 6O-Atiolgorc,Ki.'i • ' ' Walla uitli alit bps` aur' i re s wry; ,., rem'qy"l city d Motor an 7'.. 7 'ate yd agate trs ec1rjri►1r or t flity tow+ 11 te,ap ►1 or atac kM... • fiaOrrr'41- ''''.' -. -.',..:':".:..4 '.'..-4,1;7.-4.-,,,';'...1',2.:; s; eh . . • • — L11071i.PUD-08 Shady Oak Road PUD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE iE IN EPIN Cis MINNESOTA - RESORESOLUTION 79«51 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SIM OAK,ROAD PL,'AI UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDING Pii0 71 - WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by•Vir- Of'Ordinance 135 pro- vided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD)of certain areas located within the City , and • WHEREAS, the Shady Oak.Road Pinned ttntt-DevelOPOtifit IS considered"a proper amendment to the 1971-02 POD„ and WHEREAS, the City Planning Coimdssion did mistier the-Shady Oat toad . PUD request for concept approval of miniple hINint o"ffite,•fin"Won a comaercial uses, and WHEREAS. the City commit of the air of Mkt 7701.-r7.•did hokt Ipob[ hearing on March 20, 1979 to consider the Shy Oat:Road.PUD NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council•-of Eden Prairie as follows: 1. The Shady Oak Road PhD , being in the County of lenlleOn led the State of Minnesota, and legally dearAhe i as outlined in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept apval for multiple housing, office, open space, and ce erclal uses. 3. That the PUD meet the conditions contained in uacil'a motion on the Shady Oak Road PUD made at their meeting. ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this ,r.d V 07; 1979. ATTEST: 16 Penzal,-Maye . .. John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL • • TO: ETEN PRAIRIE COIRICIL fleets JANE?MEM fl&TE: )IAJ CH 13, 1979 • • Please stud'cauafuU,P the attached ipetitiicsi-rega . Oak PUD. I would Like to point Out to y r•that- `'n lNeholders living on.G014d ../EN.. i* 14w Sip**its • • • • . TO: ESN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM RESIIENTS LIVING NEAR THE SHADY OAK BUD ZZVSL3PMENT AREA DATE*'HASH !i, 1979 We the undersigned residents of Eden Prairie would like to bring to your attention that we are concerned about the proposed changes in the Shady Oak PUD plan which has been submitted to the council for approval by Gustafson and Associates, Inc. The presentation of this revised plan, as we see it, does not cmfonu to the original 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan for the City of Eden Prairie, nor does it conform to the udpated plan of 1979. • lbrther, it does not conform to the 1971 PUD plan for this area.We, as neighboring residents, do still support the 1971 PUD. Since all of us who own homes in this area based our purchase, or had an input in the planning and setting up of the Comprehensive Guide Flan, we cannot see anything but.a personal loss of value and a general deterioration of the bee use of this PUD. g0-4 Te�, S�d�aJ bb'3G A . � E)h. ,,,,,,a) c`.1 "1,.. . 4L0i ,r' r- r 1/0.(tms,qik.44,k....c 64 A 1.-44414"" e*"1.1k,' , ,1,4„, . ,f,d1 -.-• ‘4.e.)9. ..dadAjaft" Ai 474, , 63?,'N i L9 6 /;.5- e • hr. f-)7 • 1/4ed ,t-i- fj� 4 6,4. .).1,4 ( a, • t):AAkickfk, -12.Agz e„, , alL117, 77t--2rpi.e,,j ‘‘eti,aua.x-ft,A)4a,./..)„.41( V.e gt,te-cie., c G•.2.2 x"-ec... . . 4..6 / . AiieLeideP . *Yetteew-e-e• r I e/def"-tv"/f *-- 1- 1'` '‘. 1 . . Y.13(6;;;:afil- W:4 if!"'' .I-- f • t. . . . :;iks,, cdt,74._44- , 44:.:,1 _ d,42.4 4--X5p, ),-.1 . ,.• ,• 1 . =2/ C ::' x.. de e CV , .... • _ 1,11 (gDit Minnesota artmetnt of Transportation 2055 No. Lilac Drive op Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422. 160)543781 February 23, 19795. Mr. Chris Pager City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 In Reply Refer To: 315 SP 2763 T.B. 169 Plat review of Shady Oak Road M.D. located in the northwest quadrant of the interchange with Co. Rd. 61 in the northwest quadrant of Section 1,. Township 11.6 north, Range 22 meet in City of Eden'Prairie Hennepin County Dear Mr. Eager: . We are in.receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments: - We suggest the proposed plat be reviewed by the Hennepin County Department of Transportation if this has not already beau done. - After the plat is completed and final survey is made, our District Lend Surveyor, Mr. Keith Slater would like to be notified. Be can be • reached by telephone at 544-9377. If you have any questions in regard to the above cents, please contact our District Layout, Research and Development Engineer Mr. J. S. Eats at 545-3761 extension 150. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. • itI / ,/,"( Sin rely, !;I i://14 M. Crawfo P./ `�11/ District Engineer cc: Charles beaver Metropolitan Council j Gary Backer . Hennepin County Surveyor's Office As Egrat Oppom m ky 6myhper 401 ,gam m • • • • it • .. Pint • MINNES T M I RICAL IET . arm , '- � February 26, 1979 Jean Johnson City of Eden Prairie • 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, 104 35343 Deane tie. Jel neo= t • • UrZe*ieM of POKY •. IwItt.f�ff, a em e • . erraA 4ls'Patter& 13 Thank you for the opportunity to review• od. Omen oa kee.s yn.project.. it has bean reviewed Pursuant to reaponsibil es . the not. Historic Preservation Officer by.the National giSterie4reSerentron,"Act of 1966 and the Procedures of the Netiopa Ald t aoay C a r i1 :din,gireurre- --., Preservation (SWUM. • This review reveals the location of no sites-Of hiaeta i+aeo er, E nee cultural, or archaeological'e3,B �a>soase •�eai,, t� ate.id...the pinpoint; project. There are no sites in the.Area e1hich 4s.en',the 3letiond Register or eligible for inclusion on the =.Regieter,:.'aa■d.,..therE. fore, none ehish-slay ha affected by your.propel/4 .• Again, think you for your part^itipation in th a"x taaaat. 1t8' preserve !Minnesota's heritage. . • Sincerely,• . • • 11 1i. 3 to his 1C♦ear aticn: : • • • • r • Founded 1&!S '..��►8. El:. l h<t�Wi r_._ P; • • approved • Planning Commission Minutes - 3 - Feb. 12, 1979 B. Shady Oak PUD, by D.H. Gustafson & Associates, Inc.,request for revised PUD concept approval of Highway Commerical, Office, and Multiple family . uses on a 108 acre site, (previously PUD 71-02). The site is located south of Crosstown 62, east of Co. Rd. 61, and west of US 169/212. Continued from January 22,.1979. And approval of E.A.W. u The Planner briefly summarized the background of the proposal and its continuance by the Planning Commission action taken November 27, 1978 in order to allow the proponent time to work out more sensitive site treatment. They have withdrawn their request for preliminary plat and re- © zoning in order to resolve land use questions. He referred to material included with the staff report February 7, 1979. Mr. Dan Gustafson, representing the D. H. Gustafson .and R. L. • Johnson Investment Co., presented the P.U.D. request and outlined briefly the background of the project and their present attempt at meeting the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission during the November Planning Commission meeting. He explained that R. L. Johnson Construction Co. is now proposing a Regional-Office on the north side of the site containing a one story office,building, 3 story residential units and townhouses in the east center section, and a single user type of use such as a corporate headquarters on. . . the center west side of site. They proposed a loop road which has, been moved 240' to the north in order to preserve all of the ponds in , I the center of the site, and pointed out the open space defined in the area around the•existing ponds. He explained that some filling would be done in the north part of the site. The utilities would run along . the west property line of Shady Oak Road, and will be contained within • public right-of-way except for one line through the center of the site. Gustafson explained that the proponent has reviewed the staff report of Feb. 7, and feel the recommendations of the staff are consistent with their planning. The plan he felt was consistent with the original P.U.D. in existence presently. Bearman inquired what the total population they.are anticipating for . this area was. Gustafson responded that according to the demographic report done for the original P_U.D.,. about 3200 people were expected, but that figure has been diminished to 7011 to 1200. He felt that the • commercial-office would furnish a balance of trips as far as traffic was concerned. Bearman inquired whether the City Engineering Department has looked .at the traffic potential for the project. The Planner explained that the Engineering Department has not looked at it in great detail because it is a concept at this time. He pointed out that this area is surrounded by very good access, but that detailed intersection geometries would have to be studied at the time of rezoning. . • tt approved Planning Commission Minutes - 4 - Feb. 12, 1979 B. Shady Oak PUD, by D. H. Gustafson & Associates Inc. (cunt'} • Dearman asked what the total coverage of She site would be. The Planner responded 60 to 65% because of physical constraints and large amount of pond and wooded area, as compared to the city ordinance, which would allow 90% coverage. • Lynch questioned what would happen to the landlocked landowner to the east. Gustafson responded there were two ways to get to this 9 acre piece, the project's east property line and his north property line, as the area is cut in half•by a steep slope. j Lynch asked what type of residential they were considering for the two residential areas in the north part of the site. Gustafson explained they were considering family type residential for office employees working in the area, as well as the potential for low and moderate income units. Bentley inquired what available park land is planned for a neighborhood park facility in this area. The Planner responded there is poor proximity tq a neighborhood park site in the area. Recreation facilities would have to be provided by the developer. Bearman inquired whether the 9 acres to the east would be a good area for a park. Gustafson responded that 10.2 acres in the center of the P.U.D.will be designates as scenic easement and would be used for passive type recreation. He - • pointed out there would be a smaller amount of children living in apart- ments and there would be less of a need for a neighborhood type park. Gerald Steelman, 6601 Golden Ridge Road, explained their property was 35' above the proposed site and he was opposed to 90 acres of asphalt development, the lighting, and truck traffic that would be generated. He felt that it was a 90 acre deviance from the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The Planner explained that through the Planned Unit Development process • the Guide Plan was amended to show housing, open space and commercial uses. He asked Gustafson to reply to the advantages of their present plan. Gustafson explained the use would not be industrial, but 12' high 1 story office use, and that at the time of the approval in 1971 of office use the residents were morein favor of office use than multiple residential. He explained further that within the past 7 to 8 yrs. there has been more need for office space on the first floor and convenience to their sources. There were 1000 residential units originally propos, in 1571, which has been reduced to 400 units. Gustafson explained further that there is a greater desire on the part of companies, conscious of their image, to move out and build their own offices to provide better amenities to their employees. Mr. Hakon Torjesen, 6605 Rowland Road,rInquired whether there was any way • this site could be screened from Mr. Steelman's house. The Planner responded that the site plan as drawn would not allow effective screening of all parking areas, but that by placing two story buildings but toward'Shady Oak Road parking could be accommodated behind them to the east as an effective screen. Bentley asked what the income ranges of the apartments would be. Gustafson responded. all ranges, and that there were low and moderate income requirements from 1971-and that there will be a demand for medium and upper income range. i„, • • • approved Planning Commission Minutes - S - i February 12, 1979 Mrs. Jan Gerecke, 6622 Golden Ridge Drive, was opposed to charging the Guide Plan, pointing-out that the northern area was indicated as commercial and the south portion was indicated as multiple. In referring.to the Guide Plan, she was in favor of development that would keep the tax money in Eden. Prairie, rather than Eden Prairie having to contribute 40% of tax collected into Metro s Pool. .Gustafson responded that their main concern was to create a balance of uses, employment and places for people to live. Lynch pointed-out that they were discussing concept here, and that zoning and platting would precipitate much more specific review. • MOTION: Dearman moved to recommend the closing of the public hearing. Retterath seconded, motion carried unanimously. - Planning Commission Minutes - 6 - .approvedFeb. 12, 1979 • B. Shady Oak PUD, by D. H. Gustafson 6.Associates Inc. (cantle') MOTION 12: Dearman moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Shady Oak Planned Unit Development dated January. 197 as an amendment to the previous PUD 71-02 as per the staff report of Feb. 8. 1916. with the following recommendation: No. 14) Investigate the possibility of acquiring the extra 9 acres adjacent to this property the a ssibilit�r' as a park site in this area. Retterath seconded, motion carried unanimcwg3y. • • • • • • • STAFF REPORT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning ' DATE: February 7, 1979 • PROPONENT: D. H. Gustafson b Associates Inc. REQUEST: Planned Unit Development Amendment to the original PUD 1971 PROJECT • LOCATION: 108 acres lying in the northeastern quadrant of the community, lying Qirectly east of the new Shady Oak Road, directly west of the new Highway 169-212. and bordered on the north by the 62 Crosstown PROJECT: Shady Oak Planned Unit Development BACKGROUND ' Included as a part of the staff report is a copy of the November 22, 1978 planning staff report reviewing the original request for P.U.D. designation change. preliminary platting and rezoning. Also included are a copy of the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of November 27th. The Planning Commission at that time was very concerned with the tenativeness of the southern 60 acres of the site regarding its ultimate disposition as a regional-office site. Concern was also voiced by the Planning. Commission concerning the lack of housing as originally contemplated in the 1971 P.U.Q. and the 1979 Guide Plan Update. Since that November meeting, developments have occurred regarding this southern 60 acre site which D. H. Gustafson have outlined for you in a • number of communications, stating that the Toro Company who they were nego- tiating with at the time for purchase of the 60 acre site has dropped the option on the piece. Also in an attempt to resolve the questions the-Planning Commission • had regarding site treatment, industrial designation and elimination of the residential areas in the Planned Unit Development, D. H. Gustafson is now pro- posing to withdraw its request for industrial zoning and its request for pre- _ liminary plat approval and to amend the Land Use Plan with a new P.U.D. which illustrates housing. office-and commercial uses throughout the site. CURRENT REQUEST The current request before the Planning Commission is an amended Planned Unit Development showing anticipated general land uses and schematic building layout and treatment of the property. This plan illustrates 7 and one-half acres of Highway-Commercial, showing two free-standing restaurant sites occurring in the A very northwestern corner of this site. In the very northeastern corner of the site is 6.3 acres of area which is anticipated for a regional office. with ex- posure to Crosstown Highway 62. The balance of the southern portion of th6 site is shown as general office, with tife exception of the central eastern 26 acre piece being shown as medium to high density residential. in terms of general land use designations, the staff feels that this plan is consistent with the 1979 Guide Plan Update proposed. • • . {0+o , k Page 2 Staff Report-Shady Oak P.U.D. Feb. 7, 1979 • i SITE PLAN • • ;: When referring to the November 22, 1978 Planning staff report under the c' -- site plan designation.you will see that the previous proposed loop road was shown bisecting one of the northern central ponds shown on the • existing 100 scale preliminary site plan at an elimination of 895.0. The • current proposal loops north of this pond and utillzeselevation land form, high ground areas for the road and building pads and incorporates the pond within front yards of an office cluster. Access to the parcel line lying east of the northern portion of this site is provided through road right-of-way shown in dotted line. However-the exact location of this • connection is not definite at this time and proper setbacks at time of actual definition would have to be adhered to, which are not illustrated correctly in the preliminary site plan. Also setbacks along new Shady Oak Road should be required at 50' to building and parking areas. The'.schematit site•plan illustrates these at less than 50' and would have to be modified in future submissions. The northernpond lying adjacent to the 62 Crosstown service road.is proposed to be reduced in size by the developer and incorporated as an amenity and. storm sewer pond in the front yard area of the northern restaurant site. This is acceptable to the planning staff contingent upon State Department of Natura Resources approval. The balance of the ponding areas on the site are being preserved through a scenic easement and incorporated well,within the site plan. The loop road should contain within its right-of-way a 5' concrete sidewalk as . an internal circulation system, providing access between the residential units and office/restaurant uses. Also as for timing on the phasing of the project, it appears as if the northem48 acres is proposed for construction first. , . . This could happen with completion of the northern half of the road system with the first phase construction. Any residential units built in the southern half . be put in the rplaceasdpartuofethe ion act the onstructiof these units.ne-half of a road loop system As part of the overall mass grading of the site, definite grade separation areas should be provided between the apartment sites and the office sites proposed to • the west and south of the residential areas. Furthermore the preliminary site plan illustrates less than a hundred feet in distance between the residential apartment units and the office building anticiapted. Although this is schematic- at this stage. part of the requirement of the P.U.D. should be that a buffer area of no less than 150' in width be provided between differing land uses. of office-and apartment and mass grading provide land forms separating these two uses. APPROPRIATE LAND USES There are several land uses which are appropriate within office and multiple residential districts which compliment the development of both of these types of uses. One of these uses is the restaurant use, which is proposed,..although it is somewhat displaced from the residential area. Also the-inclusion cofcaould small neighborhood convenience center under 50.000 sq. ft. in size.include recreational opportunities such as raquet ball courts.and health club tasat ire a quickostopiy grocerytenantto store, dryfcleaice nings and convenience and other convenience relatedstores ' ' FStaff Report-Shady Oake PUD Feb. 7, 1979 would be appropriate and beneficial at part of this Planned Unit Development. FINDINGSAND CONCLUSIONS 1. The general 1979 proposed revision to the 1971 Planned Unit Development is consistent with the 1979 Guide Plan Update and. is appropriate land use in the area with some minor additions and revisions. 2. .The loop road system is sited well to take advantage of the natural • amenities without destroying them. 3. A provision of right-of-way to the eastern parcel is generally acceptable but specific site plan modifications would have to be made to retain proper setbacks. Final determination of the road access to the eastern property should be made prior to any zoning submission. 4. Schematic setbacks shown along new Shady Oak Road are not sufficient.. 5. Relationship of the residential units to the adjacent office units in the south and west is not handled well in the schematic site plan and revision including adequate buffering space and mass grade separa- • • tion would be desirable: • 6. Inclusion of a small commercial area near the residential would be an important land use addition to the entire Planned Unit Development... .. RECOMMENDATIONS The planning staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development Amendment as proposed January, 1979 including the following items:- 1. That the plan is generally acceptable. however, individual sites would be evaluated for zoning requests based upon their individual site planning merits and their general conformance with the overall plan. - • 2. Road access to the eastern property must be finally determined prior to rezoning application. 3. Any filling of wetland areas in review of storm water system must be accomplished by the State Department of Resources as part of a rezoning application. 4. A 5' concrete sidewalk within the loop right-of-way should be provided at time of road construction. 5. Construction of the residential ufiits should not be completed until co* • pletion of the loop road system. 6. More adequate buffering between the residential units and the office area be illustrated at time of more specific proposal. , • I' Staff Report-Shady Oak PND • Tab. 7. wig 7. The general densiitt.•ref the-resideental ar a a..thall in x, exceed 1S units per sere airs, shall include a vie of • apartments and townhouses. ... . . 8. At time of zoning proposal, nroper setbacks from,roads. . lust be adhered to. • The proposed - 9,. Planned thin heelnt.•shOU1 d be *Mended,.. . to include a small rcial area. , 10. The-cash park fee attording..i eilla' etW trdi nai cos . • or as amended shall'ie curl ect. at titre ief:wilding. t issuance. 11, Adequate area..for.r i"ea°ti space-.ian rns rie_of vvillavillai tMe::dsYeti in'tUfretiemi tti • residential units, Thfi �t111,.ts -AV.•MT d at of articular•res s tonal. tu' '8'vaoa anti lend 12. Parking areas-shall be scree •ed fry,,, Perin..- ;,;7n addiixtdn, a areas and public roads acowding -ih--•.' D g h i; e.''par•7. .. py'' tree'P`lantiOg shpy3.d•he 1000PPar' to pr Si. area similar to t[1 impart tenter is urdlsr:to provide relied fren . the mass of asphalt 13. Pri• retod. °ring, :en 'ironsiantiil ass ist Yorks i ..m ' . coal CE:ds ' *14. Investigate the•possibility of ,acqui.rin9 0Am lames d ll to this property as a Patti:4111y,df-a-park.sit;. - •axe Loki x for in this area. *Addition to staff report as per Planning:+omission ineeti09 af•Fe . °1975�. �_ ••' a, y • . .... . .._.. .__ .. • • • • •N�, ...•........ .,y.0$RTOIVU fit`--+ _ 11 • • • rrica s'' . • . u.•..... ••.•r:t• R101rT WAY ' s• .•u........... . COMMERCIAL • r•"�+•"•e•• i atl..I • w�•iri••w.= - - • .. . - - • tlr•• Rtrimm ttra3tTY., yam ,... • . h.tlrr•.. .YT' ... . .• •�1OFt,oRI10f0!? n`• i . • r 1 4...I EASEMENT .:s .. ,''. .•r a \. _ _....• ..... 111Ctttt --" . Muslim — ---- ., • • : { = •„...—.-•,. .. - 1 F2at••tth, 1 _ ti ..\�. yfiCT ' .. i•r • ICJ 1EWt a .,• • - „ : 't • • • . r OFFICE- . atl aIUM t1ENS1TT • ''•• • ' tl r ROUSING • • • .... • f • . a .•. ." -r �`i:.!1. • w.m...- u -.. ..••rr•a. draw • vy - 4 i i 1. . leers �. Ww•w•.amNO* �_ J. { ..••i ss lWroW1 } • • •• Y4' • '(. Ma*•YYN••40 - J J t • 'i j ”.4. 4 ! yy O' 1 r 10) . "rats. i . t `'• ..:41 ref; •. '•, ,'fin ' /"ia`�`J'j i '10 • • • i` 7 1.1 . r= ! ,/ 6 »G CS7AF6ON&ASSOCDIC LAND U PLAN • • .w•..•M MH • _- t•r•4. ovtuco tsAY.1111 1 •'-"a• " • • DIVISION or • 8 ® D. H. Gustafson and Associates Incorporated Land Planning,Development and Construction February 1, 1979 • • i Planning Commission City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55343 Re: Shady Oak Road, PUD Land Use Application Dear Planning Commission Members: Since I last appeared before the Planning Commission, we have spent considerable time and effort responding to certain matters regarding potential purchasers of land within Shady Oak Road PUD, the Eden Prairie staff report, and contents made at the public hearing by members of the Planning Commission. As a result of these activities, we hereby amend our land use proposal as follows: 1. Amend land use plan and supplemental information as shown on the enclosed documents. 2. Withdraw request for industrial zoning. 3. Withdraw request for preliminary plat approval. The amended land use plan takes into account the following events and • recommendations by the staff and Planning Commission: 1. R.L. Johnson Investment Co., has revised it's development plan wherein it projects the use of the development of the North 48 acres as follows and as shown on the development plan: • • —.. . ... ..wa a•._.�.f 111_..�.....a..N Uinnnenfa ccda4LA17 iriA 7 Planning Commission Page -2- February 1, 1979 a) Development of the highway comn rcial area as a restaurant and service area to adjacent employment centers existing to the north and proposed to the south. b) Development of a regional office building along the cross- town in the area designated as regional office. c) Development of a 1-story combination office-storage facility which would have approximately 50% finished office space and 50% unfinished space utilized for inside storage by the tenant. • These structures would appear similar to 1-story office buildings constructed of brick and break off block veneer. The structures would have no warehouse type docking facilities as access to the storage area, but would be served by a conventional glass double door. Anticipated tenants for this type of office space are small businesses requiring some inside storage and/or unfinished office space such as electronics firms, business -equipment firms and those requiring small product display areas, etc. Rent for such space would be structured like office space rental, i.e. a gross rent would be paid by the tenant including utilities, janitor service and exterior grounds maintenance. The unfinished storage space would have the potential to be finished off as office space and...accordingly the site plan .- would reflect the parking requirements of the general, office zone of one parking space for every 200 sq. feet of office. 2. The Toro Company had an option to purchase the remaining acreage to the south of the construction of their fume office building. In mid December they determined such art action would be premature and did not elect to exercise their option. In the absence of such a major development, we believe it is wise to reconsider the development of multiple family housing in the area, thus limiting the amount of office development in the southern portion to that area adjacent to Shady Oak Road. We have revised the land development plan for the South 60 acres as follows: a) A loop road similar to that included in the original land use plan approved in 1971, has been extended through the property connecting it to the North 48 acres. b) The area along Shady Oak Road has been designated for general office. We anticipate the construction of a general office building on the extreme south corner of the site with the remaining office area being marketed to individual corporations as single user type office buildings. • Planning Commission Page -3- February 1, 1979 c) The area east of the major:moral will be developed as tom. . • house and 3-story muitiple.family dwellings. We are presently mortgage investigating the availability of funding through the Minnesota Housing.Fi-Hance Agency and other sources for the construction of low and Irate income housing in part of this area. We are pleased with the results of this.mniended;proposal•because we believe it. responds to the recommendations made by ,tire-dunning tom tssl•on and staff of Eden Prairie, fulfills the needs of the.;LL. •3ohnsen Investment Co., regarding • develornnen4 of the North 48 urea and provides-a isase for future development _. in the south by our company. We look forward to your comments aat the public hearing on Monday, 'February 12t-. 1979. Thank you for your consideration. • Yo.. very truly. Dan H. Gustafson President . DHG/sa • • • • 413 , ;: Mar. 20, 19?9 • CITT OF EDEN PRAIRIE ?. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 79-53 RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENT IN o� EDENVALE IN TRIAL PARK WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie,has a drainage and utility easenent described as follows: • The 20' x 470.68' drainage and utility eases centered on the cannon line between Lots I and.;2, . . Block.4., Edenval Industrial Park WHEREAS, a public hearing was held'on Marsh,20, 1919, as re. quired by Tarr, and WHEREAS, it has been-determined that area: la ngres quires that this easement be vacatedand that it would nm be to the'public interest to do so, hi(111, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COLVICIL OF THE OF EDEN PRAIRIE: • 1. Hereby vacates said easement. 2. A certified copy of this resolution shall be prepared by the City Clerk and shall be a notice of ct letio P "- proceedings and shall be recorded in accordanr.,Ltehh the provisions of N.S.A. 117.19 . ADOPTED by-the Eden Prairie City taatneil.on Wolfgang H. 'Pentel', NOV . ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk• 4 r. . . • r 0 a • • �tss y-� , v. �. . s • •ao.. ti Via, `' • to : 1 , . Q • M v.._A¢ `. ,f we,A 1 t 9a `+7. �+s : rig fie{ : M r � O . • -.., • 3 ,,,,,• • rSw �f ' ::;• et > _ ;r O • .a • 4, ••'.t • • A c eft La. s. ‘, V., - f' Ts - ik % \ i I -... % i'" 4 a • • i `� \ c • ?� y� 1"• • ___..tGt M.-.--�\ ,10.00 4L .4.=I 4..00 _. • I,til N'lxust 's— t • t. g2 u4,12�g7� ,.,,. �4oj Scc�ian9,To+vma;+iSt1l6,Rot�tc S NI< • X--LXGI{' AY • T • • • • CITY OF EDEN'PRAIRIE. . NENNERIN COUNTY.NITINESOTA • _ RES011ITIli}t NO'. 7942 • • • A RESOLtITiiRA-APPROVING.i!HtI NY I ENTAL i1EALIN -. • SERVICES CONTRACT WITIfilEiiNEP,III COU* ,; - BE it RESOLVED, by the 'C4t Council of the C of en vie? of Hennepin* that the Cif Fierayeir and'CT ClerE-be aniilbrtta d:to 51h the 1979 cortmct•with t pttl•Count►",iti he :E9 are the provision of Efei 1 1 .1 Sepal ' of i Ptah"[- . • , ADOPTED by the City Council this 20th.day of tiara* 1919. •• . . iolfgai 'II: Pffi11 ];Ma Or-- • • ATTEST: • John D. Frane, City erk SERI: • • I • 11 • • • • • • - • NExo tAtC.NR. To: Mayor and.city Ca:meig : • • FWONt City Manager Alper Mated. • SUBJECT: Amendment to Personnel Resolution BATE,: !larch Y,1919 The City Council by resolution approved a Perronetl Polley on February lr.1676. which has insured uniform and equitable seTlay and a rmisin*atretta!r for il'T ems, As is the case with most policies, should be'rwineed and•ortlusted'in r- • to maintain reasonable adjustments of.poolicy to keep.pack with those practices Of . . employment in other areas. 1 need lite to suggest for your consideration an mmenanent to our present palleirr Expand the vacation and/or lave provision of.our palicy as..i`allows- Present.Yanation'Pllics • • • . 1-9 years fueileytient 2 weeks vicati0n,Der 3 • 1P-16- • • - 3 weeks vacattion-.per.year _ • li«'&"aver• . •. ..,• 4 weeks vmEib1F per yei ttloRced Yia51o05 'i 1-5 years arceloyment i""peeks vacation Per year : • 6-16 ' - 3 weeks vacation per year• 16 e.over• " - . 4 eeks vacation,per year . Present.'Acceued`Lick iLeavE Akga urs•- After 5 years--esi►lement - 26t of acerustelek>-loav • Proposed Accr Sick leave Reimburse- et $EpnCe; After 5 years-mmpl*lmment - RES of accrued sick lade • 1' • • - • • a • • 9 • • • - 322 • • • •. • 11 • • - • • • • • 12 • • - 419 r • • • • 13 r • - 4cg • * •• • • 15, • i - aLM...• • • • •' 16 • • - 77s • • r '• • 17 • • + • • • Y • 19 • • - '. • .• •, •. '., . • Irlt. • • fag. • • !'. W .^.: • Acemmrlate l8 dayar ymearJaer�ployee Aver age sick leave time iinfALPer.vilaf4eivanial It is my opinion that the.prolwsed&Magee igy closely fellow f'1. low. - titan communities. Amend-the Commie-1:consider khese.Proosp• . p. ':1 1• Personnel Policy. ;: • It is my Opinion that the overall morale of,:the GICy staff is fi x ailizO 41117e time uacd is 4.3 days per year.. the pursenunil tt twat•Lv miniNml Rod l al lrrel • attitude is line: 1t is;mp rrlavbaeodaiihu 7frat Ffl` llkr ;. propusod amendments to our cant Persoromel' , sancIPAttITIP • • SEVERANCE,PAY; • 9 have no plan 7 pay at 10 years • 4pay at 5 years 6 have no mininum years 3 have other plans .4S Yam;_ AP daYtar 20 days/yeah ,. , 15 at 6 years 20.at•16 yeas. ._. -2 2O Year1:: 13at5years 3at20y 2.at5years 3 at 7 Year 3 at 12 years .,, • 3 at 10 years 2 at 16 years years 3./ 400014,0 T .1Q /4' • . • • SICK LEAVE; • 35 accrue 12 days/year I accrues 15 days/year • Accumu14tion 7 have no limit 21 have 120 days 1 have 180 days • 4 have 100 days 1 have 90 days 3 other y S; 2 a; 1. OELCO CORPORATION Sick Leave: . 'Non Exempt" • • 1/2 day/month accrual 6 mo to 2 yrs svc = 2 wks @ 100% 24 wks @ 6O Excess over 30 days accrual 2 yrs to 5 yrs = 4 wks ill 1001 22 wks @ 607 is paid at the rate of 1/2 . 5 yrs to•10 yrs • 8 wks @•100% 18 wks @ 60`.' • hour for each extra hour over 10 yrs =13 wks @ 100% 13 wks @ 60ro • (will go to 1 for 1) . "Short term disability° *Long term disability* after the 8th consecutive over 26 weeks = 60% of pay to a maximum day 'J5/weekt up to 30 of .00/mo coordinated with social weeks security. No plan over 30 weeks • .. ' Vac*tion: 2 weeks 1-7 years 3 weeks 8-15 years Same • . 4 weeks after 16 years 2r N.P.I. /L4 tamP«relss Sick Leave: . 1st 12 months = 3 days/year • after 1 year = 7 days/year No accumulation . Are flexible in applying this policy •After one year of service if employee is sick over 26 weeks . 60% of pay to $1,500.00/month coordinated with social security. Vacation: • 1- 5 years = 10 days ;• 6-10 years = 15 days • . . 11-15 years = 18 days . • 16-25 years = 20 days r 26- years = 22 days • a • t Y 3. M. T. S. Sick Leave: .• "Mon exempt" 'Exempt" After 6 month accrual is 16 hours/month to a maximum 8 hours/month maximum accumulation of 528 hours accrual 528 hours (3 months) Employee has option once If longer than 3 months 60% of pay a year to be paid for each up to $2,000.00/mo coordinated hour in excess of 352 hours with social security at the rate of 1/2 hour for each excess hour Vacation: 0- 3 years = 10 days 4- 5 years = 11.25 days 6- 7 years = 12.50 days 8- 9 years = 13.75 days 10-11 years = 15.00 days Same 12-13 years = 16.25 days 14-15 years = 17.50 days • 16-17 years = 18.75 days • 18- years = 20.00 days 4. EATON - AL.c. k i►'vt e y my Sick Leave: 1 week salary continuation less than 6 months ssR=rce 2 week salary continuation less than 1 year 4 week salary continuation 1- 4 years ' 2 months salary continuation 5- 9 years 3 months salary continuation 10-14 years 4 months salary continuation 15-19 years. 5 months salary continuation 20-24 years 6 months salary continuation 25- years If Employee is sick over 6 months then 1/2 salary is paid coordinated with social security • Vacation: 10 months - 4 years = 2 weeks • 5 years - 14 years = 3 weeks • 15 years - 19 years = 4 weeks ' 20 years - = 5 weeks . , . . . . . •• , , • , • t , • . . ".1 . . •. . . . . . . . . . . _ • - - . . . . . • • • • . - • . ' -. . • - , • . . -1 ... 5.' .81,5f,Aq4 -44.1. est or I.itere4 . .it . . . • Sick Leave: . - • . ., • After 90 days accrual of . "'tong tens disatdlity"»After 3.• - . • • ,• 3/4 day/month maxima . amothS, thee 70/-Of Pay to-$2000/ma• •• -- • ',, • accrual of 65days ,-coordinated with sotial security. . . - 1st 3 days paid • • ,• • • After 1st 3 days paid .• . ' then each subsequent leave , . ••has a 2 day deduction unless - ' the enplcgree.has 3D or more - , . .. unused days. • ., —Alse.-- . If the employee during the . . last fiscal year used less. then 24 lumps there is no •• . . • , • 2 day deduttion•period. . . . . . , • - .• . ... - , . . Vacation; . . • . . . 0- 2 years w 10 dein . • . • • 3 years 2 11 days .. . 4 years 2 12•days - . • . • 6 years * 13 diva . . . . ... ... ,. ..... . 6 years 6 14 days 7- 9 years w 15 days • 10-12 years 2 16 days • . ' . • • . • '• 13-15 years 2 17 days • • 16-18 years 2 18 days . ., 19 years a 19 days 20 years 2 20 days , 1 • . . - . , • . • ., . , • • . . . -.i • , . . . . • . . • - ,, , .. . . . . . . . • . , . • . . .. . . , . , . . . .. , .. . - • • . . . . . . , , • . . . .. • .. , .. • _ . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . .... . . . ... . • • • . . . . • , '` 421 . ...... . . . r• .., .------•-7-----:••••;7:--•:.;„..,,,•,•.,.....•••''...: .• ,,-, ,J.-,,, '...,. ..:•..:•••,.. .,,..,,,...,;,5::'•:•.7..f.i.'?.,••,• • 6. PHYSICAL ELETRONics • Personal Leave: (Sick, doctor & personal business) "Non Exempt" "Exempt" 40 hours 1st year 2 weeks/year for 1st 7 years 80 hours 2nd year and thereafter Up to 26 weeks/year scaled between 1st 3 days at 100% 8-25 years 4th day to 26 weeks at 70% Paid at: 100% X weeks available At end of each fiscal year . . 70% X balance 26 weeks 50% of unused is paid Example: An employee with 9 years service would have 5 100% weeks and 21 - 70%weeks; say the sickness lasted 8 weeks pay would be: 5 weeks at 100% of salary 4. 3 weeks at 70% salary (over 26 weeks) "Long term disability" 70%•of 1st $16000/year; 50% over $15000/year coordinated with social security Vacation: 0- 1 years = 5 days prorated by starting date 2- 5 years = 2 weeks 6-14 years = 3 weeks 15-24 years = 4 weeks 25 years = 5 weeks 7. WILSON LEARNING ALc 6'4,004-a1'14' Sick Leave: 1/2 day per month accrual to a maximum of 5 days per year. No carry over from year to year. Extension may be granted with the approval of the supervisor and management. Vacation: 1st year 1 day/month accrued after 2 months 2nd year and thereafter 2 weeks, • t i ROSEKINT 8. ... n .. •. .. $Ic leavew; • *80n Exempt" 6 hours/month 0-3 yews 8 ho urata it 8 hours/month 4- years M.x*M searua:1: 40 days. Can accumulate,35 days Paid 1/2 hour far each • hour over 35 • 'Long jam disability`" - off wart,80'dais.,sr ICC of Sa1 c . . to 0/month coordinated with SOttal Se uPi-1;y: Is optional SO-SU cost amploymettopleyer Yacaesn 'Non twang* I hOursimonthr 00 years+1 day.on-.son*ovary 8 hour;./ . 4- years . 9 hours years " 7- ;fears .. . 10 hours/ * 10-11 years 11 hours/ 12-14 years 12 hours/ * 15-17 years 33 hours/ " 18-10 years 14 hours! * 20- years 'Except* 8 hours/month 6- 3 years Then goes to Non exempt schedule • Fy• • ' t . • I 1. • is VACATION: Years to Years Ilasimme weeks- r 3 weeks Years of Service 16 . 4.0-16 2. __ .... 15 ._ 4.445.. L 3. 17 4.0-17 4. 4 14 6.040 . 19 6. 5 14 5.044 7 None None • 2.0"N' 13 4' -1e T 4.1• T SICK LEAVE: "Roo Exert ,� Max Beet.for yearly accrual_ Max use/year Aeereal taress paid ,Jong_or.s►hort term ... 6 days To Acmes 30.days 1-for 1 _ :After 8.da.1 5/wk to ID Ws 12 To + NIA N/A After ek 60% to $1 / 66 days 112►1 Nees Yrs. Sec. Basis Yrly. amt. NIA N/A After 6 ma 1/2 salary 9 days To Actual 65 days N/A After I no 65%.TO.B9110fine 10 days NIA NCI 112-1 70S to 26 weeks 5 days 5 days N/A NIA •After 90 da 606 10-0 12 days To Aceum 35 days 112-1 After:60 da to i+o_? • ,SACK LEAVE: "Exempt" _ Yrs. Sec. Basis 6 months N/A N/A Atter;:26 week* 60% to $O00/mo 7 days 7 days + NIA N/A After 26 weeks 618%1441509W 24 days To Accum 66 days N/A . After 3 met GO to 33000102 Yrs. Svc. Basis 1/2 Yr. Amt. NIA N/A After 6 mo 1/2 salar 9 days To Aceum 66 days N/A After 3 me 60t5 a is Yrs. See. Basis 26 wlks NIA N/A After 26 wits 7. Ist 1 yr +SO%of balance 5 days 5 days NIA N/A After 90 da ;;•? telasaviu 12 days To Accue 45 days N/A - After 60 46 .ON to` mao . • • J t. Anamnippj • PRoPO$Ep AiaRORER? to. HENNEPIN CUUNTY CRI1437Tiii. JUSTICE iplNATit$ COtNCii. • • • •Article IV. N110ERSHIP Section 3. Any suburban local unit of government desiring to become a member of the HCCJCC shall execute a Saint resol ut$cn of participation• and those Sane pelts of government Which execute such resolutions shall _ jointly have the following representation en the FiG CC: • • -- fear-Slwi v 4uals,T-ellhep.arayers-er-aaeotkers-sf=suburban 4ty Emmet 1st-el'eaSedr-thrs ..mailed.aemtnaaems-aud-be nets by-she-mifers-a -eemaetl-members•ef Partlet9+'teSng-suburban Hai•-untes-e€-gevernmen • -- four individuals, either mayors ar members of s4urban city councils, to be selected by "tubers of Association of Metropolitan Municipalities•wbo represent suburban.utti- of govern at within Hennepin,toynty; • -- two suburban city managers/administrators... • • 4: • March 5, 1979 TO: Roger Ulstad FROM: Lt. Keith Wall east' • I received a call last week from John O'5li11i ,-Of-the HeneePile county lrimtnel Justice Coordinating Council a kfng if Our tYY Council, at its earliest c8nvefrieRCe;; tftal +oarsixtew',aar to the litexICC bylaws., allowing fforae1 'tio ff gMbut�f .'t~ - r�g representativesby the Hennepin t it ws e?-iI ai iarat. of i+ tri.itan Municipalities. Apparvntly. during the 1976 reergaililitilikijf .a MCC i Procedure fo this selection wt s revke T and as rdIng to subu mom, became quite mitheltame. t tihrmainiiiefietien of the HCCJCC staff and some mQ- t htS:fteePeeeeeere he adopted. The a.ached.memo f Cou )r Md.Th $-)DhnSon outlines the proposal more therOUROY-thee :I i avne se ik1 with your approval, it might he used toe council..tesetew. • 424 ..._._____........._____—...—...,_—_, : ,... ' r• • ,,,,,,,,,,,o,..r , • • - . 't, • . . . .._ittz e....r4j pc, ,..• I . . • ' .. . . . . , 4:4),!' ''',/}:11 • . • . .. . .,, . • :: . ' • . . . . .• • 4 ., . . •.•., lines - ' • • • RECEIVED ... . Cs) • December 15, 1978 .-- . . i • _... . q 'MB • ,....: . . • 7i. . • . . 1i/7.., .• . . i4•%.'. ,:.i.• rift-- ."... •••• •-- •----. '•"-.!. ; • In the last quarter of 1976 and the first quarter of 1977, yourji—F11:— ' . diction and 28 other political jurisdictions within Hennepin County participated in the reorganization of the Hennepin County Criminal Jus- :•it,71 QC • Vice Coordinating Council. At that same time, your jurisdiction executed 1...K • Pra i' a Joint Resolution establishing your membership in the Council and con- currently approving the Coordinating Council's Operational Bylaws. These .n.o ,.p.. ,,,,, .4 CZ I.. actions established the Council as" a forum through_which local.units k, . • i;;. ".• ..,,I..„',.:t of government in Hennepin County may, by association, consultation and Y. study,.:. cooperatively promote improvements in the criminal justice system 1. . which transcend departments, agencies and the geographical boundaries % •- "ad • of the individual copmunities." • .r.l. 144m • 1Z1 .- ..t:•:: chrA .•. •• In accord with this reorganization, the member units of government auth- s"....:- • -04, '.,r., orized the Council and its staff to assist local units of government and 17'::, ""11 •;.!.. local law enforcement and criminal justice agencies to improve the justice .:..'••• 111% •.••‘...,.. w.; ,: system in our county,' primarily through the provision of technical assis- ^w•;t.,. .: . 3r,Qi tance, program planning and development and the coordination of inter- Nc.,... governmental/interagency-justice system activities. Additionally, the t.i k,_i',' Council and its staff were authorized to continue functioning as the Law.'i- rgw,',-..•'" Enforcement Assistance Administration planning agency for all units of 13. .. • • ,r...-.-• Z.',..':. government in Hennepin County. ,?,:.:,.;.,•: ec 4 A critical factor•related to the Council's ability to provide these ser- vices and represent the collective interests of units of government within 4. the county is the active participation of the 29 member units of govern- -',11.• ;.)Iwa",.A,.,ment through the involvement of their representatives as specified in • .t. ..a. i•ill.'Articl e IV of the Operational Bylaws.' In:this regard, the representatives the member:units of government establish Council policies which have iyif•the effect of directing the activities of staff. In an attempt to insure •:'..-'•';..the continuation of active representation for the member units of govern- ment, the Council is proposing an amendment to the Operational Bylaws .1..1,.111'.Via i.1.,•1• which, in their considered opinion, would improve the method for selecting f„-•.,ii';. ' :'.q.."i suburban unit of government elected official representation. t•j,•'''21' - !i.,,,i,11,: ; -.t....,•! Difficulties with the current selection process as provided in Article . I•Vt':'; Li...1.1;4 IV, Section 3, of the Bylaws were brought to the attention of the Council .1:..;%::, ‘'I'.4.?by Frank Brixius, Mayor of Greenwood,-and the South Lake Ilinnetonka Public •:.01,4 •,.;,..6 - , !:,., •%. . • •- • . .• *. •• . • •. • , :e.,.P• •!,;.,- 1 .. •••: : • . .1.,:-. ..: • 51.. .• ' 4'4'.......1/ .p..• ,..: , .. ... i,... . ,.,.. . . ., ., , •,.. ......;., - . ,' - . 1 . . . wffft.= .1.Ai-i't ,A-2308 Government Center,300 S.Sixth St.,Minneapolis,MN 55487,348-6497.• .:'.)0..q.1.-..4.:•.• "•. • • . • --. • . .. •r .,,, ...• . .•- * • t21 me anve , evmsevil • Safety Department Mayors' Coordinating'Conmission. They advised the Council that • a less cumbersome and time-consuming selection process be considered as an amend- '•• ment to the Bylaws. The Council considered a process wherein suburban elected ''.` .official representation would be selected by the Hennepin County members of the r • Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. It was determined that.such a se- lection procedure, similar to that which was used prior to the reorganization, would be in keeping with the intent of the current selection process. • :••+.•L•. At the October 4, 1978, meeting of the Council, an amendment to the Operational i , . " Bylaws was proposed as a means to improve and change the current selection pro- ,,, ". cess. A motion for adoption of an amendment which would provide for the Hennepin ,`; • County members of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities to select four elected official representatives from suburban units of government to serve on f- ' •the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council was passed unanimously. And, in accord ;•':. •with the rovisions of Article X of the Bylaws this proposed amendment must be :7;• approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council's membership before it can be in force and effect, Therefore, the proposed amendment as approved by the Co- t4.,, ordinating Council is being forwarded to the attention of the Council's 29 member •uTM;lw''.', units of government for consideration. To assist in'this process, we have en- Al .:: closed for your convenience: a copy of the proposed amendment, a listing of the ?....current membership and representation and a copy of your resolution and the Op- 4;w++•; erational Bylaws which authorised the establis mient of the Council and your par- ; i:: ticipation as a member. Each member unit,of government in Hennepin County is '°% , requested to: • ' :ins:, • .:1. Submit the proposed amendment to their governing:boards 1»,:,..• . ; ' for consideration and action; and :;;i`; •, • •.':;�• �2... File a certified copy of their governing boards; action t +.;,'y4 :.: • Y' :regarding this proposed amendment with the Criminal • • * r,.'4. '••, .•+•�. ,.}Justice Coordinating Council's administrative:office Ft i .. .PT 'eti4:••' .onori before February 1, 1979.: • �'ktt'.l' We urge all member units of government to favorably consider this proposed amend- 4 meet as the ability of the Council to effectively serve the many and yarned t 4 criminal justice interests of local units of government in the county is primarily n}_ ', dependent upon the full and active participation of all units of government who itt • share in•the responsibility to provide criminal justice services within our coar- ' munity. Your past support of the Council's activities is appreciated and we . •tt,,,t :...invite your continued interest and involvement,.r ' . - `3'I, '':Thank you yin advancefor your attention to.,this?request. in the event that ad- �.; ...ditional information or a clarification on the enclosures is necessary, please _; do not lit. hesitate.to contact us or Council staff. .• , .:;:,'•I,. if,;::::'',, ,Sincerel ,Avr-:,•�C. Wayne Courtney,_Co-chai n. ;•.Thomas L. Johns* Co-chair '` ,ir�1.,•,• ••Edina Councilman ,• Hennepin.County Attorney-Elect • . 1 ' MEMORANDUM . 1 • TO: Mayor and City Council • FROM: Jim Jensen, Park Planne4 DATE: March 2, 1979 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Senior Citizens Center on Staring Lake • The staff is now receiving written quotes on the electrical work required • to bring the log building, to be used as the.Senior Citizen Center, up to state electrical code for a commercial use. The existing 60 amp electrical service is.to be replaced with a 150 amp service which allows future expansion of electrical facilities if desired. The building is considered to be a fire hazard by the state electrical inspector due to past unprofessional wiring practices, fixtures removed with the hot wires taped, and basically a non-grounded system. Complete rewiring has to be done with all exposed wiring enclosed in conduit. Two security lights will be mounted on the house with electronic eyes regulating night time operation. Further remodeling of the structure for use as Senior Citizen facility includes handicapped ramps, men's and women's bathroom facilities, new doors, additional ceiling insulation, new interior ceiling, new septic facilities, and new copper water pipes. These items have to be completed prior to use of the facility but by no means cover all of the work that needs to be done to the basic structure. The front porch is in need of a complete new roof as well as•footings and other less serious work. The roof of the house needs some repair also. The crawl space below the house should be damp proofed and insulated to keep the pipes from freezing and generally cut down on energy requirements. The well has not as yet been tested, but if the water is found to be of insufficient quality, a new well will have to be drilled. The existing water pipes are galvanized and, as mentioned above, may have to be replaced. The new septic system planned for the facility will be 2 holding tanks of 1,000 gallon capacity each. The toilets will be of a relatively low water use type, using three gallons per flush. Many alternatives were explored before this combination was finally chosen. The holding tanks will have to be pumped periodically but the initial cost makes this system, at least for the time being, economically feasible. The water table is much too high for a traditional drain field, which presently is in use now, and a mound drain system can become quite undesirable to the olfactory. Future use of this facility could warrant the installation of a self-contained digestion septic system which could be contracted in tandem to the holding tanks and would eliminate the need to pump the tanks. Construction of the proposed system will be compatible with this idea. • • Some of the landscaping, trails, patios, etc. may be completed this summer • also, depending on funds and labor availability and how much of the materials can be obtained through donations, etc. The proposed master plan also illustates the moving of the shed, garden plots, bridges,etc., much of which I hope to have completed by.fall. • JJ:ad • • 09 i b. k • r ,1J ). , i iiIi;el$ ht I sue- 0,.. t4iiig i ,lili i • .1 •ti i III t ilieli itatFrsi if�a't iit!tit f I , ,/77...:1 111111 1 .*. j .-••• VI • _ . ti if. . :::,,,..,„. . ,/.„. i ...- -. , t . n .,.•<,t... .,... • --,N- g .114, , . ,.,,..... fix,, 0@ . r . 14.110P.4 ,„,) :,4 '•11,41. --.N. i t'S 3 At . 4 A . - - , DD„,www , _4_,... lir 1.1„, _.... _ : ._ 4'. '\, ', •1-7's i ..:\ c:, Ell') I 0°7* • --„ . .1 _ .." i s n:uuua s Imo'! • I ti L i i, . a uua#;fete i • • e . di t • SI. • - 1 a t ' I • 1.P-r.:7... .• - • . • i •, , • ,,.....„,:.,,,,i--,-„.._: .41,;(..,.._........,..„.z .____...... ,.... --_-__.,. , . ... . t!.. . . • r v ) • .. Api..-74 .-.11.-„ . iii AlIMMINit." ,,:: . 1 I i _ I . • _... .---- .._.._._....._._._ _.. rra2 ....._��i . Y t1J I • _ f MEMORANDUM • TOs Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Distaff, City Manager ' • FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services-WI-- DATE: March 14. 1g7g SUBJECT: Topview Park At the January 16, 1979 Council meeting, staff was directed to identify possible sites in the Topview area for a neighborhood park. Mr. James Jensen, our Park Planner, studied three possible sites in that area; 1) The Miller Site, 2) The Renard Site. and 3) The Gravel.Pite:Site. In. his February 5. 1979 report he indicates the pro's and-conWS Of the throe sty. After an on-site inspection of the three sites, and after:studying,.topagraphy,• • existing natural features. service location and access, I wouldrnd prior- ' iites for this location as follows: 1. Miller Site 2. Gravel Pit Site '3. Menard's Site The Miller site is No. 1 because of its central service location, and its natural features. This area could provide an area for tennis courts, a tetlot.-structure, small picnic area, sliding hill and an.open Mae Play area for neighborhood ball games. This area will ultimately be connected to•Forest•Hilia Park so older children will have safe pedestrian access to the larger bal,lftelds,school ' facilities. etc. . The Gravel Pit site can be graded to allow for more facilities, but it• ld be expensive to develop because of the lack of topsoil, and this site would not offer any natural ammenities. Although. the Menard's site has a great deal of difference in the4levabion.hut one end to the other, the site is developable, but is not centrally located .within the service area, and would not be acceptable unless Valley VieecRoad iscul de-sated. 1 am now requesting the authority to contact Mr. Miller to discuss an option on the 'Miller Site". BL:md MEMORANDUM '__Li TO: Bel Lambert. Director of Community Services FROM: Jim Jensen,?ark Planner 3. DATE: February 5, 1979 SUBJECT: Mini-Park for Topview Area- —____ ..___. --- Three sites have been discussed as possible atlernatives for a mini-park • for the Topview area; they are the Gerald Miller site, the gravel pit site northwest of the Miller site, and the 9 acre Menard's site (Outlet D). l have done preliminary sketches on two of the three.sites„ excluding the gravel pit site, and have drawn conclusions on thi sites regarding trail and vehicular access to the sites, facility alternatives for each site, natural features, and development. . GERALD MILLER SITE: The agpluAimately 5 acre site, excluding the existing residence, is rich in overstory vegetation and natural integrity. The.natural mature stands of oak are supplemented on the perimeters by 20-30 foot white and Norway pine and spruce. The center of the 5 acre parcel is open from Gerard Drive west almost to the property line, with some low brush and sumac. The sve trees slopes of tand would imps developmentof edges of a_ l the -ssize z someday eld.c A�smmaall with overstory _ pie rectangular field, perhaps 120'x250' would fit well, with two tennis courts near Gerard Drive. A totlot and some picnicking area would be will suited for the stop of the hill above the southern slope overlooking the balifield. A small parking lot could be brought off of Valley View near the totlot, or on the northeast corner from Gerard Drive. The Valley View choice would be more centrally located. Trail access by future development to the west and northwest could be-accomplished' as development occurs. The trails could be expected to connect Forest-Mills School/Park with the mini-park and make the necessary connections to the future development in the existing gravel pit area. . (see figure) • :, \_.. �- . eta IOWT.'SX,... ' \ \ NN. ttimotifil- ". . \ • l' '' 'Pdrit .11 sl \\\\ \ . ___t_sra )......— Ailh,k . . . , t 4 I ' . 044 )k'N lei • ,3 ---ram "'" • • • • This peak site would be the most centrally located site in the service area... : - . 'S SII'4.: , ra This.9 acre triangular site is on the extreme south side of the servieere mn «"" It is directly south of Topview, south of existing Valley•View Road, north of the proposed Ring Road. The site generally slopes from east to west and has some Steep slpoen thetas* undevelopable for park use. The slopes are covered with;ovens trees,,acs is some of the southern section of the site. The site would be suitable ter .* full-aged softball field, 2 tennis courts-, pianric'areas,.totiet; and perking for S-10 ears. Vehicular w moos would be from Valley View'Road-or.on•an"vaty ion if Valley View is terminated in•a cul-de-sac. Trail ateess-w uld be'along Valley View twee figure?. Development of this into a park as per the concept pith ce ld,oar with .relmtiTe i . y little grading. GRAVEL PIT N N» SITE: • A 6-8 acre park site in this location would probably yield the,greatestb ' of facilities of the three sites for several reasons.-. The, 'see _out.-.a»e " would allow total grading of the site with little regard.tar.topography or si nce sie it seems likely.that both weld bee short *WIT- mould ' be-an ideal site for setting up several ballfields tennis courts, olot—itaitaWL. integrity, is however, not present on this treeless site. Top i- mil=Roane. - to be hauled in the to cover the site to an ate 44 depth :Ear a six sere site 3,300 cu. yds. of topsoil,.are net . . Vehicular access would be provided for in thethe-fatureAgivelepotent,yeelset4Citpe necessary trails to feed Topview. I feel that this alternative would provide the astat..fao 75riat of the-tax sites,r: yet would cost considerably more to develop.. The verdant Nil le~r and M naxd.sites; far surpass the gravel area in natural integrity. This site.is also lesa.`des tabie than the Miller site in its seavice location'but is better than-thAe4heard`site J 1 tmd • • •-- CITY OF EDEN. PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, NTIRIESDIA _ anotomit lc 7945 _ • A REMOTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT • ' OF HMS 'KITCHELL HEIGHTS FOURTH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat ef Hipps littchell Heights fourth Add. has been Sub-- witted in a manner required far platting land.-under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and tinder chapter 462-of the Ifieneseta StatuteS and all prseeedings hrie been duly had thereunder, and • - • - - WHREAS said plat is in all reispeob CIMPristrit With the OttY Ole and the regulations and requite Of the laws of the State of ilinnesOte and ordinuces of the Citaf•of Edo.Prairie, • • NOW„ THEREFORE,....IT RESOLVED-syTIE CITY awn-OF ve-exTv EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval repast for Hipps Michell Heights Fourth Add, is-suet*. upon compliance with the recomandation of-the-City Engineerts Report on this plat dated March IS, ss. • B. That the City Clerk is her-OW-At-recto to eilPPlY•a certified copy of this Resolution to the office of the motter of Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MCA 462.358, Subd. 3. - C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed 't0 1002 a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Hamer are hereby authorized tolaecute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Count-II upon cbmplianr-e with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on • Wolfgang H. OvizeT. Salter ATTEST: SEAL • John Frane, Clerk • to,a5 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • ENGINEERING REPORT ON PRE- LIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT • TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad. City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: March 15, 1979 SUBJECT: HIPP'S MITCHELL HEIGHTS FOUR t ADDITION PROPOSAL: The Developer. Richard E. Hipp. is requesting City Council approval of the final plat of Hipp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition located within Hipp's Mitchell Heightt PUD. The plat consists of 56 lots designed for double units (RM 6.5). HISTORY: The Hipp's MItchell Heights PUD was approved by the City Council on March 28, 1975, per Resolution #506. Zoning to RM 6.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on April 11, 1972. per Ordinance #169. The preliminary plat was approved on March 5, 1970, per Council Resolu- tion No. 79-21. The Development Agreement for this plat was scheduled for final execution on March 5, 1979. This agreement must be signed prior to final plat approval. VARIANCES: Variances from City Ordinances are approved in the Development Agreement. STREETS AND UTILITIES: All necessary street and utility work will be completed by the developer in conformance with City specifications and as required in the development Agreement. • On all cul-de-sac lots, only one 16' Wide driveway approach shall be provided for each 2-unit building. The street name Cypress Circle will be changed to Cypress Lane prior to release of the final plat. PARK DEDICATION: Prak dedication requirements are satisfied through the Development Agreement. A warranty deed conveying Outlot A to the City will be required prior to release of the final plat. Sodding shall be placed on the steep slope adjacent to the north side • of Outlot A to prevent erosion. Also, drainage shall be routed tbru Outlot A so as not to interfere with the tot-lot development. `3L • BONDING: Requirements for bending are given in.the DerelopMetrt The cost of.street signs and their instst.tainion.sha11 be 'included in • the bond amount. etegysitegnTignz Reamtend approval.ofditf,fire.er�eli : .and f+ria�ti`equi plat t e Hipps Mitchell Heights north ikdbit, sU .# rns of this report and the following: • Agreement, I. Execution of the Development�l 2. Receipt of fee for tit1 Engineering:*brines in the almost of $1500. 3. -.Receipt of cash deposit to cover.,the first year instatlletion ?and maintenance costs Of street lighting in theamount of 5580.40. 4. Receipt of Warranty deed.for Outlet R: .: 5. Receipt of bonding or Letter:of credit requ ree CJJ:kh • • • • II '^ Hipp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition { DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT • THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of 1979 by and between HIPP'S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, . hereinafter referred to as "Owner" and by the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as "City", • WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner has applied to City for preliminary plat oppruva for approximately 13 acres for development of land-more folly described • in Exhibit A. attached hereto and made a part hereof and hereafter referred to as "the property", and WHEREAS, Owner desires to develop the property for construction of 28 duplex buildings on 56 lots. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Mayor and Council of the City adopting Resolution 79-21 approving Hipp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition, Owner covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Owner shall conform with all planningg architectural, engineering, landscaping, fee and building requirements of all City ordinances , except as modified herein. 2. Owner shall plat and develop the property in conformance with the material dated March 2, 1979, revised material dated March 8, 1979, reviewed and approved by the City Council on March 20, 1979 and attached hereto as Exhibit §, except as modified herein. • • Gal • • :i AGREEMENT - Hipp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition Page 2 3. Owner shall submit a development plan prior to approval of the final plat which shall illustrate proposed grad- ing, storm water drainage areas and direction of flow, preliminary utility plans, ponding area and floodplain high water levels for 100 year storm and minimum floor elevations for all lots. The development plan shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 4. Owner shall submit detailed construction and storm sewer plans to'Riley/Purgatory Creek Watershed District for re- view and approval. Owner shall follow all rules and recommendations of said Watershed District. 5. Owner shall pay cash park•fees applicable to all-of the • property as required by an ordinance in effect on the date of the issuance of each building permit for construc- tion on the property. Presently, the amount of cash park fee applicable to the property is $200/unit. The amount to be paid by Owner shall be increased or decreased to the extent that City ordinances are amended or supplemented to require a greater or lesser amount as of the date of the issuance of any building permit for construction on the property. 6. Owner shall construct a 6 foot wide, 4 inch deep strength blacktop pathway in that portion of the right-of-way of Mitchell Road, abutting Lots 1-8, Block 1, as depicted on Exhibit B. Owner shall construct a 6 foot wide, 4 inch deep strength blacktop pathway between Lot 16, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2= and along the rear of Lots 2-5, Block 2, within the pedestrian area to be dedicated to the City as depicted on Exhibit B. 7. Owner shall submit for review and approval to the City Planning Department a landscape plan depicting: screening material between the existing single family homes and Lots 17-19, Block 2; screening material between the 'T' driveway areas and Mitchell • Road; and landscaping material on top of any retaining walls • constructed as per item f13 herein, as depicted on Exhibit B. Said landscaping plan shall be approved prior to issuance of any building permits. 8. Owner shall convey by Warranty Deed that part of the pro- perty shown as Outlot A outlined in green on Exhibit B to the City immediately upon filing of the plat and prior to issuance of building permits. La9 AGREEMENT - Hipp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition Page 3 Prior to the dedication; transfer or conveyance of any real property or interest therein to the City .as pro- vided herein, Owner shall deliver to the City an opinion addressed to the City by an Attorney, and in a form, ac- - ceptable to City as to the condition of the title of such property or in lieu of a title opinion, a title in- surance policy insuring the condition of the property or interest therein in the City. • The condition of the title of any real property or any • interest therein to be dedicated, transferred or con- veyed as may be provided herein by Owner to City shall • vest in City good and marketable title, herein free and clear of any mortgages, liens, encumbrances, or assess- meats. 9. Owner shall grade, seed, plant, landscape and construct a tot lot on Outlot A as shown on Exhibit B in conform- ity with the specifications set forth in Exhibit.C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. exactloca- tion of the tot lot structure shall be designated by the Community Services Staff of the City. • 1Q. Owner shall not construct or permit to be constructed units with the same front facade unless each similar unit shall be separated by at least two units having dissimi- lar front facades. 11. Owner shall construct "T" driveways to serve Lots 1-2, 3-4, 5-6 and 7-8, Block 1, as depicted on Exhibit 8. When duplexes are constructed on cul-de-sacs, or other • lots where units share a common garage wall, only one 16 foot driveway opening will be permitted. 12. Owner shall construct all units with a minimum sideyard setback (living space or garage on the open side of a unit) of 15 feet from side lot lines. 13. Owner shall submit all covenants or restrictions applicable to the property to the City Attorney for review and approval prior to any building permit issuance. Covenants or restrictions relative to the construction of retaining walls on any of the lots shall require that such retaining walls be setback from any rear lot line a minimum distance of 10 feet. 14. City grants Owner the following variances from City or • - dinances pursuant to the provisions of Ordinances 93 and 135 for the property: A. Each lot may be platted to a 6,500 square foot minimum. . (AO • • AGREEMENT - Hipp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition Page 4 B. Space between occupancy separation walls of duplex units may be sited on the lots' common sideyard, thereby allowing a zero lot line. C. Requirements of Subd. 2.7, Special Requirements- Design, Ord. 135, will be waived for the property. D. Requirements of Subd. 2.1, Usable Open Space, will be waived for the property. E. Each lot width and other lot dimensions shall be as set forth in the plat hereto attached as Exhibit B. P. Requirements regarding length, grade and configuration of roadways and cul-de-sacs are waived as depicted on Exhibit B. 15. All sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities concrete curb and gutter and bituminious surfacing, whether to be public or private, shall be designed to city standards by a Registered Professional engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. The Owner, through his engineer, shall provide for competent daily inspection of all street utility construction both public and private. As built drawings with service and valve ties on reproduceable mylar and certification of comple- tion and compliance with specifications shall also be delivered to the City Engineer. The Owner, prior to final plat approval, shall provide a bond or letter of credit in such form as shall be approved by the City and which guarantees completion of construction and payment of costs thereof in an amount no less than the estimated costs of construction plus 20% of all street and/or utility systems to be owned and maintained by the City. The City shall accept such street and/or utility systems subject to recommendations of the City Engineer and sub- ject to receipt by the City of Owner's warranty, guaran- teeing such systems against any defect or defects bondein fot a:period of at least two years, together with a or letter of credit in the amount of 25% of the costs for such systems in such form as shall be acceptable to and containing such further terms as shall be required. by the City. 16. Owner shall file this Agreement with the Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles and supply the City with a copy of this Agreement with information as to Document Number and date and•time of filing duly certified there- on within 60 days from the date of this Agreement. • 4111 • • • • • • • L• kelitiOniff $3pp's 14ttcheU Heights Iroui:t.h Additi Pepe 5 • _ 17. Prov*aiona of the A re t-shall ba►,..b3. 1' Ind enforceable sgsii t wrr elConenuarsp and.altdidnit pervert! 7 of the p beat ' .�� a. ��. .. 18. Canner represents and >arra 3t:. tit-in,fee t t to the p fres and Ql+ of fa s r '°thes: •encumbrances. t'-.,rent 'estate-.t> s,:int' . .. aansiananaents on said paspettYr.aildisessents of record . • and contained en applicable plats..on.> .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Agreement-Hipps Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition . page 6 • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota BY: Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor• - BY: Roger K. Ulstad, Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA} SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1979 by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor and Roger K. Ulstad,the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation on.behalf...of_.the . corporation. • Notary Public H1PA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,a Minnesota corporation � ,E • BY:. r_ l�r-e-t L Ail • Its :i71s,e, -1 c...'C ' • STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was a powledged b;E'Yore.me this/,l day of2%' ' c�.r„ 1979 by / r� �- f 7?the .- - e- Z7 on behalf of the corporation. . e _ 'rftI*74r;ditimet )1 ,ta:y Pub ie r •rY. Fit►rr;TCflltMill 1 • Agreement-Bluffs West Second Addition Page , -C 31GAr. DESCRIPTION Fart of the South East. e the SegthWea he gsctlon'26, I rship 116, '22 wise Went' f tlnaest �er�` o'f S�tion 35. T.taaie iP116' Rea e r _ Also Part off Government Lot Land Lot.2, tan ._IO W* ship 11G, Range 22; Also part of the _er Bt er.2f the Worth East Quarter of Section 34, Teag e-IP,116. 4144131 Ae 1' R Also part of Government Lot 3s Section 34, T 11' + .Baugh 22, Mohnapin County, ftinneesota. 9 EXHIBIT A .. NIPP'S MITCNELL �HEIGHTS ..___ _ .._ ._. FOURTH ADDIT • u-- IX/STING ' • tE.,1 ii ,. .. .7...jiiiiiiiii, • Lam+ TOWNNOY/S£ • . #*11 II I . • ,nnr // / --% %-7" ' 1%Wairj ji .. :,.t".-.14•,.4 1 i ',6 4 .,, ��0'r i .. • »cl s,,t r... —,'.1..1,...1.-1 Am.3.,4. jii A► (C, rMarch 2, 1979 Rev. March 8, 1979 ��, � ��/ XS�� "EXHIBIT 8" \\ r, ; • \ )--fic .•I `,-/, •' v.:,,,, ,,,-A.,‘ \a, \ ,..,?1,..„.. , 5 _ , . ,. .. .. , . , . ,,r ,• i. c...\‘, .i......__," .. . ,. ../ s.t.,.,,,,,„ . . • \ ,-..-.„,:_i tk....10.,‘,. .A1 ,..lfr „slid" : ''''",731 :S:::--.- . '; - . " 44 . *:''''' it.' . 1 ... . ,....„.......,................. , - 1 ___ am .„,,,, ‘,liktk St l'' ''; 4A-1)11":- . .7 i, ly . , ....•, ., s , ..-gm .7`. .::-. 1,111 1*" liti + ta ' Y ` r, — =_' •'% y1t4' ; . 4 . is � • .. �Y 1 1_ .. �...• A. - - - • • March 20,1979 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • & • • • HENNEPIN COUNTY, IIIIDIESITA . RESOLUTION NO. 79•48 • A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF R/DGEWOOD WEST • WHEREAS, the plat of RIDGEWOOD-WEST has been sub* mitted in a manner required far Platting land under the Eden Prtfiris Ordinance • Code and under Chapter 462 of the-Mlhnesota Statutes and all proceedings-Ube been duly had thereunder, and • WHEREAS;Said plat IS it all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of tht lahla Of.the Stitte-Of ifinitelOta nd ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. lientrunk, RE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY cceteiL.-OF 1HE CTIT OF • EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for MEM&WEST is approved' upon compliance with the recoamenda.tion of the City Engineer'sReport on this plat dated Mirth LA, 1979. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution In the office of the_Regfiter of Deeds end/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required-,b,MSA 462.3513, Subd. 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified - copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers Of the, above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Pleercutr• the certificate of approval on beha.14 of the City Council-upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on • Wolfgang H. Avocet, tieyco, ATTEST: SEAL • John Frane, Clerk -• •--• . . • _ • . • r - r • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • • ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT • TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jul lie, City Engineer DATE: March 14, 1979 SUBJECT: RIDGEWOOD WEST PROPOSAL: The developer, Centex Homes Midwest. Inc., is requesting final plat approval of Ridgewood West. This is a 176 lot single family residential plat (R1-13.5) located north of Research Road, east of Mitchell Road and west of Purgatory Creek in Section 22. HISTORY: The preliminary..plat was approved on October 3, 1978, .per.:Coun- cil Resolution No. 78-182. Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on December 5, 1978, per Ordinance No. 78-43. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was exe- cuted on December 5, 1979. VARIANCES: Setback and lot size variances have been allowed for this plat as indicated in the Developer's Agreement. A variance from Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1 waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval, date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Requirements for the installation of utilities, streets and walkways are given in the Developer's Agreement. A cash deposit, to cover the first year installation and maintenance costs of street lighting, will be required from the developer prior to release of the final plat. Purchase and installation costs for street signs will be paid by the developer upon installation. DEDICATION: Requirements for park dedication are given in the Developer's Agreement. Outlot B will be dedicated to the City for use as a totlot. The • Warranty Deed conveying this property will be filed with the final plat. • - 2'. Documents satisf7i g the i equi is of I F li-a i Of tom'' .1 ys Agreesent.(:scents�t:)'-wt filet''th the ffMl Plat. Execution of these documents will-he-requited k-requifed prior to ma Lase of the final ,plot. BONOI Bonding requirements are.coverst 1n the Devel ger`S Aureate*. Rscr NDAt1OH:. Recommend-:dal o'f the 'inal plat Of 211150100-4 legit subject to the ra4Ulr ft$ Of Vile rt antt fall i►g. I. ReceiptRecei'pt of fee fOr city Engineering Serviaes in the amount - of $3520. 2- Reoeipt of cosh Visit fOr*treat iffreteg, n.,the leseent Of 3. Sattsfaatim'.,of park.dedtnartian reqUireffitclittk Caa:kh • • • • • • • *approved Planning Commission MInutes - 8 - February 26, 1979 VIII. PLANNER'S REPORT A. Review of Hennepin County Transportation Plan The Planner briefly summarized the basic discrepancies of the Plan between the County proposed system and the road system anticipated by Eden.Prairie in its 1979 Guide Plan Update. The following comments were added to the Plan by the Planning Commission: Eliminate no. 3. Add "Signalization and improvement of site line distances". to no. 6. Add no. 10: Signal at Co. Rd. 18 and Anderson Lake Parkway. Add no. 11: Signal on Co. Rd. 1 and Highway 212. Motion: Bentley moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Hennepin County Transportation Plan as per Staff report of February 22, 1979 with the additional comments as listed above. Retterath seconded, motion carried 5-0-1, Bearman abstaining because Bearman requested that Mr. Burt Lear be eliminated from the petition submitted by Rowland Road residents dated t2/14/79. as that resident has moved from the arearecently. • • --- — • .MEMO: TO: Planning Commission • FROM: • Chris Enger, Director of Planning REGARDING: Hennepin County Transportation Plan DATE: February 22, 1979 REFER TO: Enclosed information from Hennepin County Enclosed information from Metro Council Development framework defining roadway classifications 1979 Guide Plan Update • Hennepin County is requesting the City's comments regarding their year 2000 Transportation Plan. There are some basic discrepancies between the County proposed system and the road system anticipated by Eden Prairie in its 1979 Guide Plan Update. • 1. County Rd. 18 is recommended by the County as being upgraded to an intermediate arterial. Eden Prairie has shown it as a minor arterial which is consistent with Metropolitan Council direction on the classification. 2. Dell Road north of Trunk Highway 5 is depicted as a minor arterial by the County as a realignment of Trunk Highway 101. Eden Prairie plans for Dell Road to be a local collector street. Eliminate *3. Eden Prairie plans for Valley View Road from Co. Rd. 4 east to Co. Rd. 18 to serve as a minor arterial. Hennepin County shows Valley View as a collector only. 4. The County plans Co. Rd. 1 to swing north of Riley Lake. This is directly contrary to City road and park plans for the area. 5. Eden Prairie suggests in its Guide Plan Update that County Road 4 as it crosses Co. Rd. 1 be realigned to eliminate the present jog. The County shows no plans for this. 6. The County plans for the realignment of County Rd. 1 at Co. Rd. 18 toward the south to eliminate the jog into Bloomington. Eden Prairie Guide Plan Update does not reflect this. * Signalization and improvement of site line distances. 7. The realignment of Baker Rd. or Co. Rd. 60 between the Crosstown and T.H. 5 is not scheduled within the five year C.I.P. Eden Prairie had been given assurances that it would occur by 1983. 8. In the Smetana Lake Sector, the County Plan shows Shady Oak Rd. being extended between 169 and Co. Rd. 18 as a County Road. Because of lack of acquisition participation by the County. this road will now be built as a local collector according to City standards. *Eliminate no. 3. add "Signalization and improvement of site line distance" to no. A. (Planning Commission meeting of 2/26/79) 40 • • Memo-Henn. Cty. Trans. Plan 6e . 9. Also in the Smetana:Lake A1,n,, tlieftioriven P1anaxsd the realignment.of Valley View Rif, to the.sovtik tar,al-Yw for proper widths arid.geowetri ,--The_:ley.P:T.an:a d reflect this. . The Pianning Staff would Teterftnerid..that:the-P`Manr►ing"Cpmm recerm d ttaese cteninents ar li .t1 .. r y Tk ois tatto pl'atn Ant" • the City Ctruncil as Part.of t..rit4f tt't rt. CE;ds *10. Signal at Co. Rd. 18 and Anderson'la-ices:T!erltwiqr. • . *11. Signal at Co. Rd. l .Additions from Planning Gta®i tni- • • • • • TRANSPORTATIOAI r 53TI7178 - r ®Me:rogatifan Centers . I MOO4....". t Fully Developed Area .w,. I -----1 .' Area of Planned Urbanization "I 'I'"`'—'- . • Q fresrpnd//reQrDwlh*wets 'II a,... Q Rural Service Arear I 4 &ib►ealon Design rdn ,w. •••••••"', II!gifi., NO 6._. Jon Boundary ,... .. _;. ..r. I. ��°"�•Urban Service ''YQI Boundary I tliM:- ". I . r ii..,� r„' M ' YYM.Mr..1 ppHW. p W. /ikri7 ks r T4L ,...0. I"4"-1'��. • .<.4!.... .., yy• ` i ` .sue "Y. -- ' s- • __ • W , ` i p Bey, �j��f�yy • Yf.k. M.W. •� i gnqa.rtp .' ! ...p. 1 .Y •j w....rl.. .,.. 11 IL 1 tArl. CO. � ..M.0 a.u.. O.iipl C0. • • L -- j- t--�-J pc tr 's L_.`. mp t ........ .pr.. "ate orr i 1^I p.w -or-orf d^• 1 1 j r I' ..1...1 p. .w 1. . I ...4. t pM.N I • p : I • - 1 pW...r F —'_t--. :'.,.I • Wall • M p a I. raw. w • _ r '�_� '.... t Rpm 25.TRANSPORTATION SERVICE AUG PLANNING AREAS - I\ • IMMYY••W 1 p•=ewYw.1• a.W w.p a.lw :p.=�.i.XAliii.... — 'r..`.riSp " r. p.W..«�p" . ...... p�w4p WatrJpYtlmwAr 1puM .p YY N /...y • • • 462 aai • • • • • • • • Td48LE1ttSSIIi411F6KEkDIM71G : flanolpit * t*i . • Ara9aawitityracus• .fdmrwtrakonbin te+ Ir rerAait. ti>Ste tatter Miser:pr6arldi. wr6ragsn ar+dAf� a eoMrerywmam,* .. 0x r lecbott • o bainadmrsaawrvige,t e:•aaai iltentw ,arMiir . . AYaacwri rMars••• winwirtriiiteoStri u4raar:,. . :I ,U 4 A ebiity Pnoweittoor ieVi .Psioadaf 4rlo i t• r • - 1 beTnawl t : • � Mnwnero. •btthei!O•adlaaad• v w ¢ro fl a s,,mt �tk oidai rAtreseietl• tri6raaRaob latiiradaq figBa'Uiw rTdbdiis • FINOtor hales. 1 iyaMnACo is tooMrerpracitioPwr.. to a +ili a 4. .Yol el MttMdNA .., d>f . • lariata:intemeaeie • aanae nna a iskrt�At -OMN►C91103111: fore) arieriMsyrada�ast. qdi. Vrar�ruusar>ken�t " • aAarirwr.artedda:n0 irtpw9p 100 aodialkrci` ' ..• :.. :. IWaaFlmdecc+eat. waa tl1MAt - foitt lidtiucl .. • 1QaFiAMe. " • • Tetp4►aking t004 1Whigiboat laaw:kr 'Mstlgffirt0 ei{tOS' gfima yr Ai iDg SerdcePertormat +exaaaad toiiptriist >M,• Bltl'kWket ditilrecktanitthstri. JYRE'. 'neMeVA • apmedialhin a A ilMON• .'pirf tone9rartJrsNrl, 1,0411,1411:tl Area t anaa .:E0Oreae • �iOinararbw Mira pl tiaiV' fratea .»tli:foai7arart 'gm* .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • " if • TRANSPORTATION E j. % 58 T/7R6 • TABLE IS.FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS FOR ROADWAYS Principal Intermadlate Minor • Deflector facet Arterial Arterial 3.6miles depending i.3 mites depending 0.5-2.0 0.25•1.0 t dock on trip density.transit on spacing of pence miles. miles. Donor arterial spacing. pat minus ail moor s kLtiea.nwesting arterials.transit.up • 1abMilt .density,and madamea • dealditgfacilities. tNslorineiptl tepgon twister*community InnatualcolmnunRY ©nedgesd or Within neigh. . *operettas defining seperatmns defining develeisnenC botmods a. development ardent developments and not anon dbor• neigaber a sepaadnpit. alepetatitgit Mods. use sreas. We Nonetraffic Major Umiteddireet 3dtlettm8ationon Direct • • Urban generators. teridaccass. dtotdlandeaeess. accede. Rural None freestanding Growth Cointi rcid. Actessto Died land • Centers and Rural indusfain.andagricultural Town Centers. residential uses Mtn msi • • gl la access to Smits lardy uswe low-density residents* • • Grade separated Grade separated •Tradwelg• 4-weysteps As required. • Characteristics Intersection nets and andeome Cfrsrsoferishcs capacitypal r tape bagleda tigra can' cr issaueet traffic sig • - atgrainter aed traIntersections. nets.toop • at grade taus ntersectwrts. slope street slops. fecgonslaray • • Perking None None. asRestrictedecessary. asnscessary• • tprestrctton. Restnatedes Restricted as iletsNfedas Liege trucks No restriction. necessary necessary necessay. Management tools Ramp metering. Rempmeterig.Iraf1 Trellis Minn Contakaty.number d Stop signs. kallro signal timng• signal teasel Staffing Caning.land access. franc Uis �esacs. no lend access. otreconstrucson.Sind g aws. Do t transit.pro4eonbie treatment access spacing. • for transit. inttercnange spacing federal • System Weep Suggested Wirral upper eines ter releadel Suggested federal Suggested federal Suggested arterials and inlet mediate ertenatS Combined: .5eco5en0 ler IiaWataons:Urban limitations:Urban Urban 10per cent principal i oclP as anemia 5401i.Rural 20-35% 65-60I Rural.6345% Rural percent Saarlalorsnoriata • combined.Urban il • 16-25%.Rural 6-t216 Per cenof Travel Suggested laden*limgalanata principal Sugga5tedlederai Suggested feetatm ne Suggested federal 1A arterials and memedmte arterials combined: dmddtonS for 5.10Y patdcptearferm nM arterials. �: 40 65 per call Imedele arterials, a; • andmiwr arterials j,. combined:65.60% yapfofesc rrbttUrbal 20A00•ta00.000 10.000.50.000 000 1.00045,000 LOCO 1.800-10.000 ?.50.2.500 i Rural 5,000-50.000 2.50345,000 40.50 30•40 • Msternun30 li speed Urban Legal Mariew >!6 �iims weY Rural Wit tares 116%150' 86•700 Transit Plentytontgn Pretaeatt*trestmerd Preforonleatiedatent Pe rya' Norm tµslaA(orfU litycsad Accommodations and aMinP Otero venserseeded in inniated Sonnet tented: with*dos galysrnea• 1' pia tinned peak I�at in Odic s bus tams weds designed for re t ar periods. roomed based use by regular Imes. on porcentege Vaned bunt*. fpoowktedkauad and Naha voWnes. safvteewaRamasar i edMoau ef 1 �/ nidafdtr*R1aa• G . TRANSPORTATION • ('4,, r 57 T/7/76 csz. . • i 1 A.Principal Arterials to the principal arterial system,but differs in B.Intermediate Arterials several ways.Intermediate arterials connect two or • C.Minor Arterials more subregions within the Metropolitan Area in Ill. Local Roadways high volume corridors and provide secondary D.Collector Streets connections to outstate areas.They also complement E.Local Streets tho principal arterials at locations in the Urban Service Principal arterials and intermediate arterials Area where few minor arterials are available between together make up the metropolitan highway system. subrc glans.to all vises,they should be designed • The minor arterials,to be included in the Policy as controlled access using either controlled at-grade Planes a guideline system,along with the metropolitan or grade-separated Interchanges with land access highways.are of metro significance.Minor arterials restricted to major traffic generators.Access should are not mapped in this Plan but are intended for be controlled to connections with principal future adoption following the inputs of the Small arterials,other intermediate arterials,minor Area Data Forecasting program.While the functional arterials,and selected collectors only.Intermediate classification system applies primarily to roadways, arterials provide a limited percentage of total road it also Includes transit service guidelines in relation mileage and carry a high percentage of daily travel. to roadways as appropriate. They also are components of transit service as • necessary and should be designed with bus service • Principal Arterials in mind.Their spacing depends on trip density.area The principal arterial system is the foremost element serviced,minor arterial availability,and environmental • in the roadway network Principal arterials will be factors.Intermediate arterials should not connect to provided as a continuous system within the local streets.Together with the primate-arterials, Metropolitan Area.They are used to connect the the Intermediate arterials set theiramework for subregions In the Urban Service Area with each other, planning,location,and size of minor arterials,cofactor end to connect both the Urban Service Area and the streets,and local streets. Rural Service Area with the Metropolitan Centers. They also connect the Metro Area to outstale Minor Arterials centers.Principal arterials provide high speed travel. The minor arterial system complements and supports and should serve a high proportion of the total daily the principal and intermediate system,but is trip travel.Principal arterials may be connected on primarily oriented toward travel within and between a selected basis only.Principal arterials should not Connect to collectors or local streets.In all cases ,• they should be designed as Cully control access •• .. ns� facilities.Fully controlled access means that ' connections with other roadways should be only at • grade-separated interchanges and land access should j�! k 1 r C r 7-t .f . not be provided between these points.Within the Urban Service Area.intersections should all be i._ �� rt�Y} r grade separated:in the Rural Service Area.they may __ Jr ttv be controlled,at grade intersections:with such Intersections and selected minor arterials the access "�' ���\ .i:.. • should be consistent with maintenance of agricultural • `+ i'A i�^�— land-use. r Principal arterials provide a very limited percentage of total road mileage and their spacing depends on ' ,,,1 '?' •• trip density,area served,supporting use of transit, —;r intermediate and minor arterial availability,spacing. , r and environmental factors.Principal arterial �^""` 1.. Intersections with other ertorials should be limited It ► to four approach directions and in all appropriate cases they should be designed as multi-mode nuideways for auto,buses,ands or other types of transit or • paralra nsil vehicles.Principal erterr:11 should not .;-,.- t connect to collectors or local ;Irects.Establishment The transpartatian system shan't+Prairie tar the i the ikacWal +` system sets the ire classes. la for efficient movement of goods,including considers. planning,locution,and size of other remaining classes tion of truck routes,internwdal(mains's,and the Intermediate Arterials incorporation of goods movement systems in major The Intermediate arterial is the supporting element r eh( activity comets. • • TRANSPORTATION R 58 TIli76 • .adjacent subregions.Minor arterials are generatly spaced from one-half mile to two miles apart and trpically are two to lour-lane streets in the Urban • Service Area and two-lane roads in the Rural Service • Area with signals or stop signs at major intersections. Minor arterials are primarily oriented toward the • provision at submetrapolitan mobility and any land access should be oriented to public streets and maw . ttatfic generators.Single-family driveways onto minor • arte:lafs should be strongly discouraged.Minor • arterials are generally not to be continuous across two Cr atere subregions.Minor arterials are also an .-_ • •M►aportant component of the transit system providing many of the routes for local transit service.Both • design and layout of the minor arterial should reflect Ills when appropriate. • ;collector Streets • The collector system is to be deployed nearly entirely within subregions to provide mobility between • tsfmmunitiesand neighborhoods.The collector system • provides as much for land servicia as it does for vehicle mobility.The collector system also provides a ' • Naallection and distribution"system for the trips canting from or going to the metropolitan highway system.That is,the collector system provides access tocommercial.industrial,and nigh-density residential • development,while the metropolitan highway system (b more oriented toward line-haul or the"non-stop" portion of trips.Collectors are spaced between principal and minor arterials usually ram one-quarter • • rite to one mile apart.Collectors are usually two or • tour-lane streets with four-way stop signs and traffic signals at intersections with other collectors and • minor arterials.Collectors should not normally provide access to principal arterials. Local Streets The local street system is deployed continuously through all developed areas to provide tor local circulation and direct land access.The local street • system is deployed within the grid of streets created by the collector and minor arterial system and • comprises the largest percentage of total street mileage.The local street system m localtransportation t ans.Figue should. addressed 6 shows the schematic layout of the functioned ri+ssea • • 654 1 !_ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ; "-; 320 Wcishinglan Av. South • ' -}� 7—Li ,-s. I-lopi:ins. Minnesota 55343 ...r• HENNEPIN • Ji__ 935.3381 DATE: January 24, 1979 TO: Officials of Hennepin County Municipalities • • SUBJECT: Coordination of the Hennepin Ceunty Transportation Plan for the Metropolitan Land Planning Act ,(MLPA) FORWARD This letter and its attachments will describe how the Hennepin County Department of Transportation proposes to coordinate its transportation plan with those of other agencies. The transportation plan will be included in the Hennepin County Comprehen- sive plan and will describe, desicnate, end schedule the location, extent,.. function and capacity of existing and proposed local public and private transportation services and facilities. . IRTR0nUCT 10_: The "itenneein County Transportation System Study" (HCTSS) was co'pletee in October of 1976. This study was prepared for the Hennepin County fepar-.,Trant of transportation by the consulting firm of Bather-Ringrose-Wolsfeld, inc. • The purpose of the Transportation System Study was to develop a plan for a Year 2000 transportation system under the jurisdiction of the County that: Is compatible with the values, attitudes, and goals of the residents of the County. • Is compatible and cot:eplaiwftary with the planning of other transportation facilities in the County and iratropolitan area. Is sensitive to changes in: availability of gasoline, metropolitan :.i. development policies, usage of mass transit, carpooling, van pooling, etc. • Addresses roadway, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian trades of travel. i Is capable of accommodating travel in a safe, efficient manner. The study produced a guide to the future County system for the Year MOO. This guide, called the Hennepin County Transportation System Study and Sumury Report will be the basis of the County TrAnspertticn Plan fur the f4Li'n. i. • • HENNEPIN COUNTY. 1a 7 one ppo,tunityemployes ti . . R ,r.. 6tennepin County Transportation Plan, Page y • • N ... DeparIn order to fully comply with the intent of the MLP'A, the Hennepin tment of Transportation proposes to submit the hn County t upplemental Information, maps, and Hon A Attachment with repor tS ashflrtn 4F1 AttaChtrent TMA r the MUNICIPAL CONCt1RRANCE The Department of.Tr ensportation hereby within Hennepin of -Trty review their requehe that all Municipalities material handed out today ,end/o-as shown onopy of t At RCM tachment plusthe Any problems/suggestions for coordinating ,� uAPli°menta ,y with the transportation plans ofthe liC-Tes and supplemental informationr ▪ witted transportation gencie:shoutd mdiatel Douglas Mattson, 935-3381, Ext. 255. If no comments y he trans- • gestions are received by March i, 1979, .will ass� nTr ur`ni is t on Plan is satisfactory to your agency. ? fiira Tr �tttspn� _ S cerely, awes M. Vold, Chief, Planning and Progranmring f/JYY:bg Attachments • • • • • i. 2 21 511 Yj V r.m i. w 411 NR N 2-� n '1 .�2f 04 n 3 • „6 6 aE 1 C t •�•Itq r�3 S NM 1 O V 3 y Y 3 d 0 �J O e�.� + O n N t� n.. O 1 n tc 7 NV r 0 2• o d 3 K 3 w d 1.. 1 .0 :"'. a n f61 N wra n co - 3 ,?.o„ $•poi• ��1 m» Cl Ps .a. .0n :o_.`.a t rc 3N a % .T't `0 it O rq .2-.0.� Con 1 w• ..•al i Y '� �w N,q ro - A 'nw b 000 o or 6 • e ;CO N N a �3 aN r 03 �•^. •4 �"" .na a a Ua 3o C 3R a03 1 r� .. a n 0 a 6 n n yy ry A 0 y3 2. IIp a 3S roN A I. Ct 000 �3 a I g g a! g a a� 5k8 p ^.0 ..K 0 ba O O Ra 3 N - „ oI.r -� C 3 .0 ti q roN ro N a ;3 3 sdr et et A 43 A 1 N a G N a 911 Y 0 a g VV +`B�13 a 6 C m m-aw G 0 . 3 N [� �y yy yy -, `e•-S•+ 2.24 1 0`2O aT. 34g{l •.NC AO 30 02 W^SIO n OO n 6 g5e•'r.. µ 1 nn Q606 Nf0�C �nqp+ 6 �p r••• 011 p� L S•n O ..• n q 'C'G 090 /�f�1 K Gn 6+ 7 n N n n F 1 P O 3 Nq i0 f•-• On Nnd Nr -.":' :! y _ • 2 K'3 . (0 3 3 G,+• N 0 4 A O 0 ••• N 3 1 M O A N e 0 1 n.+O q 6 N -• .t 1 0.N n 0 N 3 ••.O S V. O O q.� N•.. 01 O 7N 4•1 n bn..Q 0a nrn 6.3 r 331 6 •r± p.q p -•.O O Y NNq S. N 10 6 j. 66 3 �1 d Nro n 1 v VI-'•�-I g.A 0.� n' -.3-0.2. om..I to i O S .�.N Cl Oi nq O�• N3-0 .1$$ 3 �.3 na 3'1 r..wry r N3< O,4- 0 '•0 3� +y0ro 4D 0r CNN ••*•�V q4N'" 'nc+ONp .- 3 • •.0 4 A' >n- nN • .16-p dN ,q3,�'N 4*411 6-MT �N n'J In 7d 3 v 3�. ;n� �^ N1 33 N+•nn 0.y n'l• 0a • o.a 3"ON i1« 1 Y 3 N O O S.9 • 0 ^ •.0 ei - 0 •« 7 il3 N 1n 3 Cy+ '.N .n N n as it pn n-. 3 11.ar o �N 1;Q 0.'-. 0 N N_..0. .4 0.7 •'4 Stet 0 4 '0-1.3 .. - 0 . 3 n 6V`t v.- V S0.+ 0 • t rta ra et VI ,"+ n a s .1.1.• 6 C O as 00 g,°' 1 A...0 Fin V •m C-3`r�.p 3 a'.Z.g� h nN 3"3 ni4 a OY'3 ro� N : OS�J0 O•.•p3 w �• SM NNO SOn 3... # K <n 0-S 300 S b 3 Vryry,O N q Ma 3 n S`�y b'` q•: N = • 0.7E1 .4 36> n Sp 3 y. g p2= 3 n8 W• n • 400 1419 mn•-w O naG nOJ n• O6 S3 C a dog � 0 a et a .5.. b' .yppp S VOG NCf.. nnyl+ ni x-a YA N•••IN n{A nWa ANE N.t6W +S V C 5 C O 7, O-•-q1 n. O+f.: 3•w C a f[ qA O C >O n p p aj0* 00i 3n C_.A0 Oro{ ti.nN ONs N3 OL 3V a5 N•c l •e�"•.3•6",AiN 34 r.8.r 4 QV 0 � C 33 N333 f� t n q n\v n s C.1Cf pq3 sL 3 ��3 iyTA 5,a�' N o 'I i3 3 ^n•AY1 1.n�•J AN 6 V }C}4�>q�}�p2. G d Y i b a £ 6 9�11 WN3 4)0 d 30 •_T.l ¢P.N N •w c.0. 9�1•wV 1 3 l a••.•i0 C W 1 V Cl(0 C. 0 0 d VI NN q 3 1 Co 6 10 T tw r.... nab „do-+ Ond ':V Vro nr4 p n 11• N a R ^AV n r q A6 n b 1 9 -+ T,.V S d pT 3 o S O d r N� ng 0 9 6 O S w.2 N - 15 3 0 pN c i O • a 33< 43• O Lro 33 v1 N V 6 1� OJr G6a3 y.M M3 N nq y'A '4 3 p WO n a O '] 07 wo O�2' " aSY 2 p•=..p r 2 n N n'6�� �wV � as g.:�a z^v^ C+3 Fyn AWN �;2* ; pan ...N" C*CS C O 3pnp � N`O^-* 2. g Nq 3i� n O ro w n 3 3 p*O f 6 q o 1 tt n .d 1n n 'S n n' g .4•• ."N 41 rTi . nq,p ON qy yp.dd i ro R »4'pi9 Y =XI2 L.6" j.K" •d N O n r 1"h n r , n a 1 Y<M N w• 3 1:!R . Y O. 0 C 13 on V15 flV a 20 a A' n• . ...�r o.2 �qvo nq`-.• ebt1 •o a'r scan „ • 1" N WV.: INN.. b Iy' Lt- M -4 Vj0 C 0 N rN V 6 b V N q V.iq r� : 3• ` t0•t 0 N CY •• q 1 V N,u .2 W1 N I3 N •yy0 qq1 Y .• q] ..nE. .Nt NN N v 11N ♦ 0 r ID, •"•I11 b w • N N x"r 6 q0•..1 q3• N 33 n. aCs... 'N N O 3 O s N ro i 7 q •v• gwgi G ��yy• . uA Wy Jn ;' 7 .3 Y roY V �1 • a Vwa.I 9 3 a.V �M N w 6 C7 1 (o5 x Ma D Fr►0 HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( • FIVE YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM r'ITl'4/c://,..v. h,7' ... -1b - MC PPCJ TYKE Lf PPG./ • bU hi teeth VOCATION Leib N0h1CIFAL111 1 6840 CMAD-ELIF V6114 61 St 1L NC CF b3h0 ST "-- .57 NLNG1h 1 6846 N1GH1/NAY 66111 S1h1E1 10 63M1; 571,Et1 .57 HUG'''. - 1 '•7672 G1AC-6LI'F 83PD 6114E1 IC FA1 494 -- ' " .69 ilFG1b • 1 1672 NICH1/hAY 6380 olhLEl 1.0 FAI 494 .69 NLh'G1h 6 7659 Eh-HFCCt.5T Al PAlr.1Eh CMEFt .10 1kUr.0 6 781.7 8h-MECL1ET Al PA1h1Eh CIIkK .10 11431.0 17 6829 G-S-NFIDGE 701h FikEE1 IL CEAO 62 .65 ECI1A 18 6744 h1GH1/101 PF.VISICts Al FAI 494 .10 H1.FGlh - 35 7719 G0AD-6LNF CSAN i 1C 6161 SIMEET - - "' 2.12 6tYGIt 53 7E07 I-IGh7/AAY LYtDALU AVFI.UE IL FAI 3515 .47 PC1-416 • E1 .7614 GI•AC-5L14F TH 12 1C SCU1h1-lvGE. HEAD' .22 WINA " 66 7614 CCI.SLI-UES bliCet OVEN P1SSISS11F1 01VER. .20 FPLS 63 7660 8h-6kCChST Al PAII.IER CkEEh .10 INCFIC 933 7245 tlEhl/hAY CSAN };+6 1C F.ASI CCUI.11 LINE .50 :1Ah1H '110 7062 14I681/n4Y CSAN 16 1C CSAP 151 -1.69 F'CCE.0 -FK'IMSl 125 7586 9M-PECCh51 SkF1F:C FAMK-8LACh LANE CNAAt.EL .10 FCUMC -EFM Pic 241 75::3 HF-RECLl51 GEhbEH CAFES .10 FECINA , 3 1261 NICHI/hAY CSA11 4 IC CSAN 61 2.25 FIKA 3.8 6706 G-S-NNILGE lb 7--61b AVE IC PLANE FGAU 1..50 I•CFK1N-6 I. Fit --2077658 bF-hECCtSI Al 2916 57 4VEh CFS1vhf EH • --- .10 FFLS 53 7607 C'hAC•-SLFF LYtDALE AVENUE 1C FA1 35 h .47 NCHFLC . 57 7569 GMAC-EL•rF w ENCfthAY 10 LCi.N1 AVENUE .96 FRS 62 6939 NIG111/hAY CSAN at, IG CSAN 61' • - 1.25 ECN-FF-FIKA 62 7419 147011/hAY 1H 101 IC CSA.h 4 2.20 ECh Ft-FlIA 53 1205 GMAT:-rUME CSAN }.fb It EAST CCUh12 LINE .50 SIAa1N .110 7002 G-E-MM1DGE -CSAN lb IL CSAk. 151 1.t9 P..CUt.0 -1411,61 144 7828 HIG111/hAY FAI 94 1G CSAN 12 6.55 HASSAs-LAYILN _-3 7203 .0l•AD-:LI•F ' 'CSAN v IC C5A1+'61 ._+._.-_.___.__- -2.25 M`1KA . 16 7818 BP-FEW.SI OVEN -FANA Ct-OEl th FIFA FILLS • .16 FTKA 40 6872 G-E-NMIDGE NOHLEN AVENUE IC 12111 F3MEE1 .25 11.1S 62 6839 G-S-L'FH(,6 CSAN 6v 10 'CSAN-61 1.i5 ECb FF-F1NA - 62 7419 GFAC-.ChF Th 101 IC C.SAli 4 2.20 FEN PA-FllA 102 7012 1ICHI/sA1 CSAN 9 IC CSAN b 1.19 CPYS1L 110 7410 M1C1•1/hAY Al HUML1t.G1C6 hlh11.11.o hF .30 Fh18Si - 144 7628 GNAU-ELMS EA1 94 IC CSAf1 12 6.55 HASSAA-CAYICh 2 7727 GhAti=:ll+F --HASfiE.1.q. C'FE •1A 114 52 - _ 1.40 YF1'S 2 7724 GRAD-ECMF 117 52 'IC CtiaLl1G AVENUE - - 1.40 NHS 10 6933 IICh1/hAY 80141N Lf fill 94 1C lt: 52 I. 152 1.20 PPP FK-F'M1G1.1I .18 7227 G-6-EF1UGE 21.1 61 I.E. 10 SCUTN (1F ANAbA CR .40 }:ti-hlh•S 1 FA 44 7412 VP-41CC4S1 Al NA161EALS PAY .10 F.b1NE1-FC6bC E6 7614 G- MI•l0GE KAShitGICir AVE 10 PAF'SEY 51 .60 P81.8 • 116 7414 616111/4AY %AS141111LN AVE IL'5ES1 tf.t: EF .2! FFLg .. 402 6820 N1GNl/hAY CO HU 70 1G 4161 AVE6U6 t.thlh 1.62 C1Y81L 102 7012 CFAC-ECNF CM 1C. CSAN'F 1.19 C91611 :110 7410 Nh-NFCChS1 Al NUNL1641614 ht.I•1hEhh NN .30 Fh1N51 - 130 7467 141Gt.7/4AY CSAN 16 1C 'it. 52 6 152 .62 NNK 46. +• 1N 6933 G-5-k1.1CGE -tti.1N Cf FA1 94 10 IN 52 1 152- --1.2U8F'It fK-MfLCNiI' 31 7431 GNAU-ELI.F bblh :IF667 1C 691N 21f•11.1 .50 8618* • 31 7631 FIGHT/.AY 65111 6141/1 1C 691h 811-ttl .50 EC11:A • '-6 7434 NV-14C146'1 UVEh 4t.1L11.t.-1ta L110[1.s0i. kk. _It► Gtrs+lt 6 • • _ 1979 SAFETY iimROVEMERT& tKxraiL. CeciROL Ian= -_.f:`' 11.12, e . f OCATTOM ;WEST n P1 ii;ii�Ar flr _, >5"0• 1 iii 169 Roots°lntelaomtion. Pew Signal -.Edon-.Prairie 9f0TtT r3+. 1. ISO 5 CSAH 1611-Q94 iie�r Try Flae l ara> lime-tint*; t09. 9 Quebec nor Traifia Siguai •: 'fi • 17 Gallagher Row TrirM4.3't il• =Cdlnt 11t 37 CSAii 62 Ramps 29c Roving/'1 a f e signals ( twine;,.tai6v;i tr:.` 17 V. 70th St. to N. lii2ml St. iiigi�rT Iritm rr .lK: 1 1lT rrgteir; 019 17 _11 90th Street L7iirlili@tixt.is Re Ise.S1grtata `1Tlmoim trait,: mg- 17 V. 96eth Street thatvaiiE<&:I i :'Sigaa'l&ffitiJ) 5i .,, , 0 r •' 31 'V. Gfith St. to U. 76th St. ' ltl + ; if lyd .. 32 90th Street Cl eeelize&'Revise Signals 5]00 mY tat ._., , SAil 62 to 66th Street ' ) 1116brl.id.Sional S16c,,,r.„ ;n .... $2Cith St. to 93th Street Wnspea ified Loeatieas 9" Signals '10 9 lle" tobbi.0 'au :: Unspecified Locations Spat Sale .Improve t Pro1e t Unspecified Locations f979.to/00T'.Con+ w ction'Pert iaipL- Agreement Unspecified Locations 2979 tip1s. 9:igna1 P'aitic3Q,atiOR; Agrsament.• Unspecified Locations 199 9A Signal:Participatioa - • moot - �6 , _ �, • 4. 2980 SAFETY IMPROVEMENT & TRAFFIC CONTROL 1910ONK .. _ °- • • 'RAJ ' RD LOCATION T DESETUPrpN, '-',..:";-.. ...7512 3 E CSAH 20 to Louisiana Ove 1 r Islands `:bus liays4 H it, . . 7513 3 Dakota to TN100. Si nal M adcnn,brook, l-ntcr nn.' S39n41 Update eta-, Revise Signal-8roo.kside,''3ign 1 Inter— ? connect (F.A,1-4 Channel i"ze and.-N.c -Signai-. 814 6 Vicksburg Lane : 7812 18 Betty Crocker Drive Ramps Widen,11aTps;., tip.Sign4l5 76522 19 CSAH 151 (So. 0ct.) Revise 1nte rs G96 35 CSAH 62 to.E 90th Street Signal 1n €m -emu =) tangy 7687 52 E 65th St to E 90#b St Signal'.In ':con Unspecified Locations 6 Ow Signals is Unspecified Locations Spot Safety Inpr..oveaint Projects • Unspecified Locations 1980 13n/.00T Construction- Rartisipatio.Agremt Unspecified Locations 1980.4ls. Steal Agreement • Unspecified Locations 1980 AR Signal Particle t30t1 Agree • • Additional Funding to Support Continuing, ProleetS • • 514/78 Rev. 5/25/78 ' * • •- ' , , 1 s • ,, 1_,.1 r s... s. • \g,4) •' • .. ,r,,,,-ii---r. ;,........4-.,kir.1;.•,,• .. (I,. ----.Ity., 1 ..., \.. 1 -....., t „....44. ,......,,./.„ . ,..,...1....1.)...s.., .;,. & ....-_. -v , ,- Ki e — . , ..„ • ,. ,.. ,... • ,r,--;=? := . -n-a ..1....c...•1, i 1.. .1:\ : . i)e......1/1.1,....,,........1.1v.. ....l-Ss I Saas...S.-)' ... !.;%.1 .4.•.'' !, '.;i)— j r. .3/4\••-- i -7--lic ;fp— .•? ' `-'."..'3' ...: s...-4 ,. •t)t‘:. .• ‘ ' Ns i iv.f.-----.-r— • . -it/10o .—.1. ;;',? '=, '1.4:rf2,\," 4 1'I: 4-- ). (1.• A. ,, ,,.. ;. u)-i k.• 4 ,,„-i - • %,...... __,....;14._ - • Y,ipi- .• . - . 4). ,...r.1..., - ,iti , P g ill • .r-z ..--' g ' tr:' , I -. -f-1 1 * 7';.•• ; , c,:.4 4•7•4':'. , •, - 6* '0 ..• g 1 „ ' • ••s' .e. 1.,fre! ....."4:2 4'.;:•sc..._....,,,,,, • . m t 1 •• -...,00,44 0. • ...1 1 Z ° '"`kit., ,,AN i •• 4 IT:: ,.....2: • — '1 r''-t.'•• ' ' -• # r ., \CF—If 1:'.4.1 .:1"— 1-=1,*" ....• --z• ri**-.* •— .—i 1.t ,0 .:::: :3 .,..; i, • 3 . L.al, r\_ . i:;. ''• 4.'41' i)• V..... •-..,1 •;*: . - • . , ..., (..2 3 tijitif/,f) ..":44 s‘'....i.,...I, l'ii...1'•'.7 s.i..V...4, i 11 H 4 `9: , ..,, t :-.),... il Li• ,.;:,••,:';:-:.,,, i..." -‘—'4.:_N.._:...s.tt,-.....7:1.:":, 4'3' \ .. __,•••••".1 t..# r-.'''''''''.; .1 •(9(• '.....-- ....A .!=, ..,. .. • ....., -, ; 1. ' i I r_tf.....„. f-,_••,,,, I .4s.sr..... .. • 1. ,. . ins Fi ax, es.2 F; 0/ .• :,f , j.., ..i. :...., -.,.... .,,-..... 0 zi : 4: . ",-...":9 ...; V 4,,,,,,, ,,-, 4,- • .. ,.,............ . - ,./. ., „cif ...... ,t,,,-,.,-,, , ,-,1, \ '' .•-.7r-r...s....-,--: s ii •• ' .,.._ _. *4S,,,,...,:=HT."......f.,;,::-....:.. .re::,,...-zsz.li.*.s i 1----.7--r.-: •:„....::••-sar.:r.,:;:'-:-.:„....---:-:.......'•--....:-.i::!;•,,,...... . s• •, iy• I t• i • 1. • ./ -...r ••,••••i'-:-.:48.11-."."--- . Nk. ..;:,:'':••i\q, ..... :". A 4 , 1, • l-- :.3.-1',. - s..--1.).-,7,- • • li 1 -----** 42' : 1••••••••••:' ?..--7,71,11, 1,!, ‘:!4.1:'t,, 4 ,="•;:::,...' -,:...7, i',; c f 4.....•,- .: . • ---..n...--..... 1,4.. • - •..•• I t••••••=.,-,.•-• --A.'. ... ' •I i t;A ' •••• ."•: ; -13 .-:•%-,',..:._!i4)-- • :!-:. „•' \ . g • i - ........._. . .s i ,.:j • r•••\ • .:.; ',..{ ' rrs li • ‘ .....1% i , ,••• --- - 1/4„,k,. • ••., . XR , -.--I, '11 If il : , ....'..1,... z>.-,.... • ...‘„,....„,,.; i., •:::•,Cn.' „..... 7,..„v„,-1,---.,-s..*:r---..iv.7.17•7•Tr••••1:7,7.7-7—41)::..-''Z':'r:1-•44'....'" .• • ill ;L.; ....A 11.,..1,1 :li .. 1.i. . ii.;•i ..-1 . . . r c . !. . (.:, ... , ; s .: t; ..44„........,,,....\.;•::._ „....,....„:::::.„. _ i ,.. 1 0 • r , ,i.:...1•:;,..,, I F./ , '.,:••••, ,. I •• .., •S' . • N — - . .L1\ ..-,1 \ I I i; • • •,:..r ..,...1.; r....... .,...........!......,........,,....„_. .. •rst..,is,,. \ 1 11 i 7 11: ,iT7.)4. •i-:: •77.y.-7 .. ....,7(..H 1,Y w 1 N;:::. '''' is . •. 4 f•S .:, ir. :"1111-"j . '...-*',..*:::::Z.r..14.V.7.' --'1_,.rz,•••-.......°•....L...1 .,1-_1/4•••tj. .,....et,•;;;,„.....?..::.,,71. '• ...-L ...- I fa,.. : I.;; '... '-':-**.I‘..„ ' pT, 0:c u)cn r---. -- gr : -1 " 1 01110C:: . \ cZCCO ' .., r, ..,, .1 I i . r :i..7.=.. .i-tr.'-'c...,.:•„:--: .11,r. • , 77• -4);• \.:••- .71 ••1 41 X"zi .4> \ii. zegsase=:.' sons %. . ....:AS4:4....zsassis.... ,.:,:.je--,--1-L....-7.-7,....:::•.: I. "( M :•;;t. \ ---1,. — . 1"' i;•• • . . ,..„. P....;.......4 . ' je....;s.'t. " .,. .T...;.%.• ..t2.1.l'ille..."4:Lc A.•,?.6•J'I.::••cl Li*i : I . 0.1. .4-.' $ .?Vt? . 1 . ,. • • It.t., ‘ ‘ • • ., :. . ..... .".,:!-......-:,:-...-...: .... •-,.1. I s.... • .. ;-3'1.TI 4 ----- .P- r.%•:-- .,e ' .. — --fryl , i f P!..i;lre-- !, -17z • . iii ' = i:t It... .___..on - i-- • . rilun., i s•-•-,,,,..._.....1 0 2 if , ,:::;•*:,, ,;..1,..4.4...,'r•rs.r.•-- : Y311 I .:. N sit),..)-A,:\,-, c",/,".;:l!,$"".a4 0...e..., . (43 . 4•0„ - 4.-..)...... , -<z5z-c 1 • ,..w..... . I tv-1,,t),•-1•7•:b. ; • tr" z 4 1 /eY E '.111/ -— • , .C.1.., 0 ' 11 • 4 4 a...I. 4ivr• •/ (4. ._ . i . : 'ir*.".'•4...'"•:.'41,.ar lit ,•-.1•1 . ' . i'•• , • • , . 1 I V ",, $T) • atil itl. A,:-..:„':6...c r+ g 1 -05141forsP Amt. .7.4.;,, i . •, /i• s.."7- +.41,-1'..\ii DI:., -*•:-...,., ..!,.*,, I: b-Pi-?Ni t• . •-•-••••• --- .. _._ i'/ •-•,..,_'...-'-..'_.7...:•••(4.4` ; -ti. 7.- .s-gi'''.1,.. -••••..._;' %,--:.:•Ti '\.,4,..- . ....--: 4...1.,•,•. // , . ;i'l:•-r-'-.4,1::-.)- :-....,' -.-- It i,!-/fN.% ti..----, -- .;\.- ./......../ 7.,_. ..,............., ...„, 44.;;;;.- T‘.---m.---ig..-..----, • yi.1 4„ T1,1 I. tatt)i•,-1 ----.. „0.,/"Y"(ri 11 " ;IL'S 'I's t , . • „ ,,.'.:t— •• — t.4-••=1.I-- :..":1 .......;(--(:;;4:". i --, a , r __I- i „ , v ,,,..- \ c.)1 <,•:„Lizzz>. :',,,',,,., . ../ . , . .,..yfin.,.1 ,„t. ,.. „ .... 3 t k r., ! ri ...... ' •••••••••,-.1 .-1..i 0 T..._".I. Ifi.-''.1.4.--III• v7,r 7••?..37•••••,... I!L•Trie. .• •• .; .1_ _.g,..,..j...k .._17,,.:.-...c-- ,..-. tj • 4t \ 1-- - ,. \-- • • FC'• 4 • 1 1 (1)— N.0 . f i L . . 1 0 1 1 4..21_ .‘r."--,,..- # 7------.-en- .. 0 . ,t , ...::...--,Z.-*"'-',7,"•,17-\Y----r,3---, . I : 3 , ii- i '1.' icf: 'cc mini- ' •,t , - 1 :,.., --- ',..,,P2-r........:;A:i,,,.:-...-7--....:-L...,--.,,,rp,v.-: • li. I srl m. .2 .1,, ci• ...,f,, tuo....mo. ... :1.."..!.'-1' 1 4 0 '..i•ir.,is. . 1,-- .1- -.1---''-- .--- .: k.... 1 to cn a:0 ...:.' ifi`'-'-i,,,,--;01 , • ••••--•i 1 I i ' .-1•-..,',4,-..1,...+1-: -T.---,a,"•27— ---,L1-,-;:: , .....-1.---.v.'. •i ti, • •••-.--1•7 ' . , i'-.:4-".1"-L',41,-.7tVat-t.'4:....: _fit.... ;:,:1 'Itv,!,.t..! 1 . . .....-1.-.1. ..4 1 . ,.. s.f 2-, ,,. • , t (z4).p - i ILI' I-4:r - — ' ,f.C>2r,',,-.-1.„-..--i---1---Ltc..P .I ;I I ; i.. ' g...,714' .3 .11'4142.1 :..,...r•... 9 . .".." 0-WA.L....;.;....... .. .. :: t )°t 4 L 'All ..4..r.,. ic 1 ,.-t ' r' . . .: • te,....0', • • 1 '• .....t.i.17.2.,,,,..n.,,,,:.: ..t...7....... I:...-,•;........, . .p.,,,....,.......,:........-..........•E`,.......;•-4,..., .............. ____ .4,54:1.- ,. . ' ! (II i,... 1.::-;;I3' \ .c• i 0.e-•-•'. .^.. --"*-."-- ‘i ''...'i 1 !! 7 1.- ..7 'as. 0 !' .., ';. 1•1 i • .1. 1 7. •**".., r' 4' /.' .. . ::)... r .1.-.)2'tyti... 7,....r..""•-1:1. -..::. fE'-'-!.%:-r-I'::•..:.!2 ...k-7....:......0.... r............. _.... ..... •-9,-.:(71. 4.64” • '... -...-t-- •- ..--..• :- r" • I . *•••• ,,,,...., .. .1', „J :I' ,/ 1 i . :ti. \ ,,,,•,•• nr! -:.-- . 470 \ 1 7 1 - Lit.v.i,,,,,,,.-,,--..._. , ...lit.. i .'"1: ', %-r-..1,L:)• •• I ;i!1 '.\-d.,..,:`,,...: VI 1 4.::: !t1 LI .-4:: - •i'ii E i•-!, '''.'t- 2 •'3.... s""Nri:1:27.".•'''.: .1 11 ... :. ,..\.,,•,71 \di! , ' : 4.-.. ..,,, -1 . ,..-. ... :„; .„,.y....-.2.........,„ s.... s„, , F.•.; 1 . t 4 '... : ....17. Tit.T,,A / C // 1 4... ..''Y r,' . iNLP . • r" I A -.9,. ii b k••=.%.71.•,z.rt17:7,77TC.,;-::'•f;;;2: -.7.:.71,22,-.1...,:-',•••....:4:.7...:1!,<••••:,:ft_.t..'::..:.:-:::.'..:26.•1.2.-•;;•.+77.7:,.....:•,:e..Zr:-•;.=-.7.7.7.._''.1 •-- ..:', . •••••'n,••••,-7.a ., s' ii4cri-A,-)1 it V 1rkri0„1 ,‘-',.". (t.f',"..... ,----N=,/r-4 . .• = "i 1 IA r, ,, • t i •=ti-i-we... ''7";•-77'••• •."Par . , i' 1; * "i 10 a It% i- f 1-7F, ;'4Z-tif .... *.- ...„.:E-1"..,711,?7 ---? 0 • . At • a . , :--,---.:- ••'' ". yi • .-"4---,. 1%, ,/I .i P •-• W. F P , . :. ••,-1-:, i:::';'\,10 -1 _•,. I., IR.. ......,.. _,...„ e .: r... ": 1- '1.-.-Li.':::(t.:Al-1 si./•:i-.'..-.•*.L.V ir- I.' ti.... ......::. i.../.. .........,•• .1..;.•".....;. fp cr. '....( • .. ......(004::-.3....;•:...v.....4.•;-;.:74.....',....„.'71! i k.. 1, itoli [ II :''.2.' '"-.::::-,:j%-'-'..".s.:"" - . t„,z,„„,...,_ .... 1\. a '...,, :„...,1.--°*:--.1t. cc: ii "'.. 6. . 11/4 ...rite -.... . . ._,....., • ....... . gt. .• ?II 0 ,.. •• _ 1 , :43 1' ,t'!7`.1 ... -. .7'Z'' \ 0 2 • 1 \ : Ir- .1.-1,_ ' c. Is"-r.'... •"' ;')11 s 1,-:;•‘. t f • ,.. iLkn'---t.. ';'••'..-1%7.•:: 'N'•••'• -`3 I . t„.1- l'''''.0\s.... : !:':'--.."'N''''''TC7---..----r-1-7('-1,-.... —'-.::111„..... •7,043'---- ........... s% , ..4 , : t,,.• , d.•:-....1 1,..= ...,-::: .;-..N )--->, :,: i f A4., ... • ...Awn '0, A ...' fe..0., -- 's }:\,.. ,,,... ....,,,,-•,... *• ..•_..•=.:•:... s.,..c., •. ' 1- • -,\ , .... i... • , , ',..cr . .1- -• -: ,if.i I, ya••27-ft 1., .7:11... i . • >.Al c.t, •• s• • i...o...."'"•*7"N 4 if .4.1 ofoc, ..., *1-? p.„--4 1-,...-,... t;..---..%---i\j---i-, )---1---.:. ----,1,-;.:,:r IL At k.[.. ----L,s• 4.-- • •,.1.1.,, ri..t........., F..- i.r.„---...., . . 1 --....), .. i /.••. .1,4i"; . • .• d . r ‘'...1 __•i _ _ Tr.10.,.. :I --. iV4, '.i •••• r'.= .• /I-.- ' L- •i"*"' • , . • 4 . ift .,,..e.k.,. -.... . ,--1__I I :zi t...:a t::s.-fi E . .3 I.•.1 ,- '...,: -1,•,.. • it . I. i..1 • ..•,,,....T F1.1.1„N...1.4 ...........,,, .4 ,,,e1•11,0 Al 44 3c • I ig'. ' lec) .s---,;r-:71.,_ ""*•-•;,•:.--.:\ f ii ,,1 \ . , zn,;:f, , . -,,,.L.._:.,.... i .,•••• j, ,..,....••• ,„,,,-*.C•:'•.‘../:..1!-14-47,:i4." is>, .:“...r...-4.!....-z-Tt...;'. .„• .12:::.1.:17,1 :;;;;;,:'•I 11 :1.15 / ...%i-4..,;,*-•4:,.. •4. -...,-,..1.-i.L.,\!:I .........el .-4- . ;-::' i : ;! ; 1 , ., ...A._ •-cti LUCC•- ' ;:::- 74.-.:7-(..' 1 .....t.._:211......_,,,-- . `. ..-...... :.,# . "t;c:-,,,tii'v',:. a ...1 T:t 1.. s t'N cpt.---1 i •-.1 , -.: ; .,,T.-I -2 !.'t•::-; ,.„.:,L.L.,..-.....,„...„. .. . . . -7"..t.z.,!..,..''--i zi-'•!-,-.4.--„..:,.............-44.4.........,.."-........--7.7,.7.,`;; . . -.--t- • - \,.. .-..t.:',' -.i ''''. \\>\ Z.! - • !:I '._!)--rrz.)--•kt , i )..- IN:, fp - f ..__.4,__. ,) N\I ‘. , " " ;-.I , ,t... .. ,.. IL 3 I -•_(**-----r-,k7rr . --4..,-. . "^, .. 0 •-•"' , • 7--..--.:-.....--...-..._ 4.1•w•4,•-•Ni---.,...1 1-41 ' • 1 ti 4 x •4I r---.." 4447., ... ,.........„..___,---ft:i.44:4••••,.-4,-...b.44.. ...a.s. ..,...,4e...'--..24... eto.,...Q.:.r.........,,.. . ^7:0 r:Z .73. .7--.4 i. -1 1 1 ii _.) _._,:i 1 . ..._ •. . -......r..„-.-..,...-- „-.....,.....„.....-4:,...1.,...,...44.4.-. _.__wt.....,........-... . ... . - '''...,,,, r. 0.17-1 DI-,...:-",;:ei .'•.: • .}.,,,,,j •1, -1 f ii -1:.•I.-g. t. I.-4 .,..1 --...--..-.. _ft -3 Oth10 . .•• / ii)tn 3.:0 -':• :-4:.......t...7.:?.2;.;;.4T.L:%.?:,f - ...ST' • .1..c,r'r:-1•••• if 1 1.....,•!...4-4-...prti ....:7,4•,:-..44:-••.•fp.r-rek... 3 ii.:7•4.4„-i_J:it.: ... .1..:.;...,,::::„.•_..,„..„,..,,,,,,L..,,,,,„„:••::-.7-1-4..,--•;_ -, -. . _t 1.7 _ .. :./, ..... ,,,,,...............z.... ,441/.....-0.1.S.14,-.:, .4 10..,-,,r 1 • i • . , . .-• .., . . ,-,...L. •1111144......./44,..1”1.4 .•...42,4,4 . . • ‘• f i .C,'\,..t.,. je...rr- ....V:.% :, .( 1-,,•• .••, •.-7-• 7!...'"',..;"'.."...'w•'.•-•..;:. ...„4.1.7.1„,,,, ,,____.. t, 1 1 I 01 I s . i 0 \ Z...t..•1,-,•: 10.s....v,.:77=41 I At, \I,., .# 71, . C, '. • •t, i . :,..1,, ... - -.,747!....,:y. :'.1-Wa..-1:77c.:.•%t;'71',1.:%. 4••••- , - e relf 4_ ,i,,,4,?,..1 ti ...,„....•..„.0-1-••••••-•••• 1, I.4 , , . 1.11 tfr ..• - .-.....„ r' • , • .-•- . .!•-,./ ,. •-tt../_,,,/• 7.7, , It...74.1'•"17-..Z:::'**...1 ** *"...*'-••- . :Zr.:...k...1Y:.r.iizz.z:;17.:1:.,.7 " -.--1-*''• :::.;' .4 ......-•.. . 44).. ...u•-1 :I r (-71,_"...1.: "*.---r-"AVi,'.• i • 1.--12-,q,••••• ___). ‘,I .., : --: sr,..,•,,, .- ----1 il • - - , .....'' ;7", i • ;- if., • i It. I li i */ . • , ui .,-.11 ,,i, ; ovi! a ••• j;.4%..7k-^"t•.r,r7. 1.----''17-,:t-,-,•, .s:Jil ' 11 ii tt: 1 c,(4.41,t'.". ..=..-Z 044 ,-:' . . 4 - i'•• :11-7%. r.•1721.1.1 b on ..; ', l' +.- r -1::::•-•,i•, 3 ...,, ..,, ,IC* 1 1 ., / . ,'.?:;*k% Iii...7..,.., , .1e-' _./,........447.7•-; Al=•‘...;.• '' ."-\..., ..4...L._ _egN r" ,__, ,i:::.1::,:,7'''''. •-•••••••••••••"'•• ...••••••••••,,-•'44: ( ,, . =44‘,EiT,....:.. , n E , I i f 7,4P-$.‘;). il et 's(1,).;1\•.-.,_ ._ ..„.1(.111P1g,. 1-, .-,/ r- R.ri• 0 q 13 •:.e - • • . „..,. 5 ., . .k - ' 17_,...„)!•*-............,.Vil • .0' , , . ,„ .1 t *,- ; ...1 "k• I • .it / •-=...) f)- •; f j ii,......! , .> . ._ , ......,..kozi • ti,- t-. . ..• 4 0 k « • -z-..-,,I. • ,„ . ,, n . •4:•;:i tr... ,:j., '41,... Z•:i‘‘'4 tP;/ :.. •,:;•• s.,,,K,,:.•;I- .. ?i 4 il.; ...k •.•, ' r *••• ' 4,40.1,:. 3) kol• 1 1'. li- .' V.('2• •••••••••"'..... C.. • ••••••"•,',Ne."-r:1:-1.,',"7.70-7..,4•4-":" --sd...42: 7: • 0 ''2 1 1 II : ...• ..... ..- _:,607.---. .. ,5•.-4 :.. it, .C4. n if.: .h,..„ y 0 i .1 ;t 19--L.3_ • ' • •..,.. ,- 0, 03, • I ,.0 ....., .-•••.•4-v N._. ..7.-..-ttl.•- .. \ • I, / '- GO • i.' %!`1), ..1: (" ' \4)• ‘I 1 . i,„....."3.. , irp vc ,.. „.. . .„... 4 • ..._ , , •\ , • zb. tol_.3'.. --) • s.• a I r 4 ;'..; •-• - ..t. '• la*".: •. s -*:y •'.; it ! i•-•••••••L.:._....._•• '.4. '. j .....,!. -• .. ....... • i I. '\.19. ....- • gfi?*0- . y to i.. .".•••:. 1 1 ..L .0 • •'-'. l, nr`Fr'11.;";: t-,sj.). ''!\\ n t • ‘, ,., ),41 1 .,,7 W, i•ii i'1 ••• •,..„ ,1,4' I... ...: %'F.-.-. N.s.! /..,.......••••...• .A..1 4.4,,,.. - THE GARD 1\1 Orchard & Nursery • Hokon&Karen Torjjesen 6605 Rowland Road Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55343 Tetephone:(612)944-2404 • February 27, 1978 • The City Council • City of Eden Prairie • Eden Prairie Lot 55344 • Dear Friends) Enclosed is a survey that Dean Holes!. and I conduated in our • neighborhood. The signers, who represent all but two of the private properties on Rowland Road in Aden Prairie, are unanimous in their view that the dotted line for an extension of Roland Road accrues the parkland to the Beath Read area should be stricken from the long-term projections envisioned in the now Guide Plan. • At the citizen's forum in the Guide Plan last fall, we asked everyone at our table and surrounding tables whether anyons wanted that dotted line, or knew of anyone else who id. No one did. Accordingly, we recommended that the staff remove .Thave expressed my regret to the planning staff that this has not yet been done. I understand that the Parks Advisory Committee feels there should be a trail connection accross the park, rather than a connector road. In this, I believe they represent the views of both the community at large and the Rowland Road neighborhood. • As *nest of your awareness of community wishes in this patteer, I hope you will amend the current recommendation of the plannVng staff • in the matter of the Haynes subdivision. That applicationws a 4 60-foot right-of-way pointing like a dagger at Rowland Road. It implies that you will approve the dotted line in the Guide Plan. We feel certain you will not do so. • So long as the Haynes subdivision is separated from Rowland Road by the park, it is an appropriate land use, in keeping with the home(tenous high-income, single-family character of that aide of Lake Bryant. Rowland Road is a cohesive neighborhood of a very different character. We pride ourselves on the diversity of our income levels, our land • use and our life styles. We like it that way, and there is deep sentiment in our neighborhood for doing all we can to maintain our diversity. To plan a comingling of the two sides of Lake Bryant is an affront to both neighborhoods. R: .: tful]y v41 c GARD N ,-_ . orchard & Nursery Hokon&Koren Torjesen 6605 Rowland Rood Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55343 Telephone:(612)944-2404 February 14, 1978 Dear Neighborss The draft of the new Eden Prairie Guide Plan contains a dotted line for a future connector road. It would run along Rowland Road to the vicinity of the stables and then cut aceToss the parkland and the north end of Lake Bryant to tie into a new road system being . devised for the other side of the lake. From a long and inconclusive conversation with the city planner about this, I get the impression that there are no overwhelming . reasons for projccing such a road. I told hin that I thought most of my neighbors felt as I did that the dotted line should be removed. . Since the City Council will be studying this plan in a few weeks, rr the,city planner asked for a letter expressing the sentiment of our 1. neighborhood on the connector. I propose we send him this latter, with opr views recorded one way or another in the columns below, and then take whatever additional individual action we ma wish. Respectfully I:, NAME MOVE THE DOTTED IZNE tO NOT WISH TO t i`0 EXP.3:SS OPINION 4 IS NO OPINION IN THIS WAY x : ON'tip., 6C6 • +. .. t. M Firth 1 , iil tITY 8F EDEn r r HENNEPIN cryforr, REsotitirmo>>io-. 1149 - RE,SOUTf1ql inrillarraNG PERMIT AritICATION • WHEREAS, the.proposed sanitary.sue iir Oileasood Wet ri entrei. • a connection to the MetrOpOillen UnSte. t 1'CelesiSMOS OW) inetetegtdr system: and WHEREAS, the proposed ' r Cdefli t .Edefi Prairi Comprehensive Sewer Plan;; end. WHEREAS. tvistreutIon punsWIN*proPosed extension ham:-Isitc;`:.. .. submitted to the Minnesota Pa11 Mon.:u!tr . HOW, THEREFORE., SE lT Rr 'DY the'Eden Prairie 44 ',G it as follows: The City Engineer is hereby'eet tdi and directed-to submit an application for**mit fir' Consection to or Use of Comnissi.on Fucilitles"' to the-4CC. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Counc l on 1 D11nen9 H.t e1;_'fever - ATTEST: SEAT, Jahn D. Frane. Clerk • • WESTW000 PLANNING&ENGINEERING COMPANY March 13, 1979 • Mr. Carl Jullie, City Engineer City of Eden Prairie 8930 Eden •Proirie Road • Eden Prairie, .MN 55343 RE: Ridgewood Nast Centex Hoses Midwest, Ins-. Dear Carl: Please find a copy of a letter from the Mtttropoli t•W ta. Cot 1. Commission which le self 2pfaiargi As the r p t iO4-00e>T 0 resolution by the Council$. air stad4f t� et.d fora 7 for processing, with tha.819Mepti*n t '.rsgir�IJ,'9: 4. t '" be acted upon along with final plat appi oval. If you have any questions, please do not h ittate to cal— • Sincerely, WEST ING 8 1KERTHG COWAN'? Dennis Mashula, P.E. DLi:bm1 Enclosure • cc: Tim Eller Joseph Lucioni • lIE!7@. 4l$W 1tt*T*U MLVWC.JMMNt#0p1 $UIEmA l61lt lilfl'19tI O*M , " , , WRITE _ March 8, 1979 Mr. Dennis Marhula Westwood 7415 Wayzata lanni Blvd., Suite 202ineering , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 Re: Ridgewood West 1 and 2, Application for Sanitary Sewer Extension Dear Mr. Marhula: The subject project connects to the Metropolitan Waste Control Cmenission interceptor, 6-SS-670. For this reason, we request you submit a Permit for Connection tolestropolitan Waste Control Commission Facilities. En- closed are the applicable forms. With your permit application include a drawing indicating the area to be served by the extension and the surrounding sanitary laterals, a, statement explaining why connection to these laterals is not possible or not justified, and a connection detail drawing. In addition, include a City Council resolution: 1. Approving the permit and authorizing transmission; 2. Stating the subject sewer extension conforms to the Compre- hensive Sewer Plan based on their review; and 3. Stating you have submitted the application for extension to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for approval. The subject application for extension and Permit for Connection from your community will be acted upon when we have received the afore- mentioned information. Per the telephone conversation with Mr. Robert Peplin of our staff, the connection detail should be revised to indicate the 8-inch lateral entering the interceptor at the.8 point (809.25). The invert of M.H. 1 should also be lowered to eliminate the excessive slope (40%) between the manhole and interceptor. If you have any questions in this.regard, please contact us. • Very truly yours, Bernard . ton rsomflcorouaKaR Director o iaeer ing annr�� BJH:RJP:hw Enclosures , . . . • • , ' . . t . .. _ r . . . . - — • i - ' - ' • - - _ - . - . MEM1Z . TO: Mayor Menzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Juilie, City Engineer • DATE: February 1, 1979 SUBJECT: Registered Land Survey for Lot 1, Block 1, Golf Vista Addition - - The attached RLS covering Lot 1, Block 1, Golf Vista Addition, has been submitted for City Council approval by 6rollview Invetment Co. ttd., whose company is constructing the multiple dwellingS on this lot. The purpose of the RLS is to divide the lot iftto 6 tracts and thus OITOrt the sale of individual units. This diwistomr mill also facilitate mortgaging . . the units at the time of sale. The property has boon zoned RN 6.5 The enclosed letter from Gregory D. Gustafson further explains the regoest. . - The siting of the units now under construction confermswith the approved plan attached to the 1/17/78 Rezoning Agreement. Dividing the property as . „ proposed will result in violations of the City setback and density rewire- , ments for RM 6.5 zoning. The Restrictive Covenants, Declarations, Arti- cles and By-laws must be revised to the satisfactiOn of the City Attorney to insure that the future owners of the property or dwellings.Waite their. right of objection to these violations. These 4o4uments have been submit- ted to the City Attorney for his review. Recommend approval of the Registered Land Survey for Lot 1. Block 1, Golf Vista Addition with the required side-yard and density variances. CJJ:kh t,k440 A Dt.o.t att.07., 3/,,m, id i elop.41., . • air.At,aaA....toz--- • . _ .... .... . . . . . , . ... • ' . . • GUSTAFSON Ouszostors ' ATTOWEVI wr wort ilia - 74o*wenn MULIENSION •-- °MOOR'S D.mews ' anutor.my/MOWN fkiiiik - iipainett.ourrstaat ' 01P-COMPOM • .Tmumituumft TILLIPIIONS.alb*.learniti ManWAMWVOW 4ouruicaums w*erktre*Aurastir 11101,30.0 lotet.12NO ems, ATKINIKef.Ilk • JaltU.WAY'Ut 10• 79 • ' - Edon Prairie City Council. City of Eden. Prat.,:le 4950 Eden Prairie Road • - , • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Pas Golf Vistas Registered Land Dear Council Members: • The above-captioned law .Gatv14it, tnvcstmeflt Company, LTD, which is curreatly..censtructing condizilautti 0440 upon the real estate now ik%.0q-r ..!.:.4.-as Lot 3., Slack • Addition. On behalf of our client we request that consideration .by Council be given the proposed Rogisterred Lend Spryer at •tbss Council meeting to be held on February -.6, • ' • The proposed Registered Land.,...4^arvey is necessary Since. condominium project is being hilt is stagee, One of the posed buildings is currently .corutvructe4,, another of the building is under construction. Since the.Minnesota Condominium- pro- hibits expandable condominium projects it Will be neresnarY to have a separate legal description,ior each parcel containing.a • condominium building. Hence, the proposed Registered Land•Stuvey • is necessary in order to obtain the separate legal dessriptiens. • . Copies of the Restrictive Covenants, Declarations:, hrtierva • and By-Laws, along with twenty copies of the proposed RVE18*;0419111_ Land Survey will be supplied to the v14.111,041 by .)nnuary lit WI,. • Thank you. Yours vary telly!, ODSTAPSON, IGISTAIT001• Gre9G. D. Gus ttp4 • • • • RLS:cw , cc: Mr. Carl Julio City Engineer i 1• _ • a py .u•y , ...._................**".'.."':; .. Ie ,t if 4 1 s, i? t • Nosh\ • . ..... . , . .. ,- r t 1 I,,,.. i , 1t r j 1 ; . , .--t j ` 21_ t•=. 3 1 1 --I..4_ - t ..YI t. 1 r,p i 1 c„ ; ; t . . " .mot T"_~.I 4. - .` . w -4' !4f..17 µit, h°• 1 I t i I w )kF i k9. ,. t 1 i j I ♦ , 1 1 _1 to ! t it 0071'4,-,"\\ \>•4* e"-3$1. \\/114 ci-. ..).,......_,..,.. . .i.,1 . 4. filf L I.T § N i ';'c. 11':1'.414': 'i *- •orr..,-*.r..i".ti, VMS `•,., . ti, �1:3 r mac. .t .`0* A f'a' ,.ice• ' +1 °3'' t 1 .,yam iAe March 20, 1979 e STATE OF MINNESOTA • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: I 02-07-79 3170 VOID OUT CHECK ( 3.25 02-16-79 3201 VOID OUT CHECK (27.84 3209 VOID OUT CHECK (14.50 • 03-01-79 3508 PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL ASSN. March rent-Liquor store 1,895.13 3509 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Car registration 5.00 3510 NORTHERN STATES POWER . Service 558.06 3511 LEO & SYLVIA DORF Easement-Lotus View St. Imp. 651.38 03-02-79 3512 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. Liquor 444.46 3513 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING Liquor and wine 630.05 3514 JOHNSON BROTHERS Liquor 630.38 3515 WARREN BAIRD Refund on dance lessons 10.00 3516 FEDERAL EXPRESS Shipping charges 17.00 05-05-79 3517 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employees withheld and employers ASSN. contribution 3-2 payroll. 7,188.38 351E FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 3-2 payroll 9,108.15 3519 UNITED FUND Donations withheld 3-2 payroll 32.26 03-07-79 3520 HOPKINS POSTOFFICE Postage for "The Happenings" 420.76 3521 JASPERS, MORIARITY AND WALBURG P.A. TRUST ACCOUNT Option and taxes-Miller Park 59,973.48 3522 CLAYTON & MURIEL SEEMANN Easement-Eden View I 2,137.20 3523 STATE OF MINNESOTA February sales tax report 2,778.35 3524 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION February SAC report 19,775.25 3525 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA School-Spraying 10.00 3526 GRIGGS, COOPER& CO. Liquor 813.15 03-09-79 3527 ED PHILLIPS & SONS • Liquor 1,101.64 352E VOID CHECK 3529 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Liquor and wine 828.32 3530 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING Liquor and wine 384.16 3531 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING Wine 518.93 3532 JOHNSON WINE CO. Wine 339.77 3533 MINNESOTA WINE MERCHANTS Wine 125.63 • 3534 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 671.13 3535 STATE OF MINNESOTA Car registration 5.00 3536 NORTH CENTRAL SECTION OF AWWA Seminar-Water plant employees 115.00 • 3537 NORTH HENNEPIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE Seminar-Jack Hacking and K. Wall 74.00 3538 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK . Bond payment 280.73 3539 AUTO PARTS PRO Lift jack-City garage 393.00 3540 ARMOR LOCK AND SAFE CD. Lock repair-Skating rink 42.45 3541 VOID CHECK 3542 ARA TRANSPORTATION GROUP Bus service-Community services 174.80 3543 ADVANCE AMBULANCE First aid supplies-Fire dept. 1,393.61 i 3544 AKINS FIRE EQUIPMENT Supplies-Fire dept. 37.01 l.73 March 20, 1979 i 03-16-79 3545 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE Feb. and March insurance 264.84 3546 LES BRIDGER Expenses-Public Safety dept. 2.50 3547 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO. Keys for new fire station 354.00 3548 LAURA BAKER Dance instructions-Community services 201.60 3549 BATTERY AND TIRE WAREHOUSE Equipment parts 28.59 3550 BROWN PHOTO Supplies-Public Safety dept. 10.56 3551 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE Books-Water dept. 27.60 3552 BUSINESS FURNITURE, INC. Chair mats-Public Safety dept. 72.00 3553 BLUMBERG PHOTO SOUND CO. Projection screen-Fire dept. 357.00 3554 CLUTCH AND TRANSMISSION SERVICE, INC. Equipment parts 196.89 3555 CLUTCH & U-JOINT Equipment parts 48.57 3556 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CD. Supplies-Public Safety and Fire dept. 35.72 3557 CURIE PRINTING CO., INC. Business cards 45.00 3558 CASH REGISTER SALES, INC. Supplies-Liquor store 157.30 3559 CAROLYN CASSOLA Guitar instructions-Community Services 720.00 3560 CARGILL SALT DIVISION Salt-Public Works 1,415.22 3561 CUTLER MAGNER CO. Lime-Water dept. 2,950.50 3562 DYNA SYSTEMS Parts-City garage 209.36 3563 DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY Installation of one terminal and one STATE OF MINNESOTA printer 100.00 3564 DORHOLT PRINTING Service 1,421.84 3565 DALCO Cleaning supplies-Fire dept. and Water plant 232.99 3566 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CO. February services 22.50 3567 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS February ads 255.39 3568 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOLS Gasoline - 2,157.94 3569 FLYING CLOUD OIL CO. Heating fuel oil-Park property 127.74 3570 JOHN FRANE March expenses 108.44 3571 FLAHERTY EQUIPMENT CORP. Repair parts-Fire dept. 244.39 3572 LOUIS FOLWICK Gym supervisor-Community services 48.00 3573 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. Supplies-Tree Disease dept. 52.55 3574 FUTURE PUBLICATION, INC. Supplies-Community services dept. 30.25 3575 FEED-RITE CONTROLS, INC. Ferric sulfate-Water plant 1,131.00 3576 GROUP HEALTH PLAN March insurance 849.3D 3577 GRENDAHL MECHANICAL, INC. Contract-City Hall addition 475.00 3578 KARIN GORI ' Callegraphy instructions-Community Services 128.00 3579 GUSTAFSON-FUKA, INC. Electrical supplies-Forest Hills warming house 15.84 3580 G. L. CONTRACTING, INC. Repair water leak-Water dept. 564.76 3581 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO., INC. Electrical repairs-Park dept. 122.86 3582 GROSS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES Supplies-Liquor store 7.85 3583 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT Hot water heaters-New fire bldg.; Firetruck repairs 2,478.42 3584 HENNEPIN COUNTY Supplies-Engineering dept. 211.30 3585 HENNEPIN COUNTY Supplies-Public Works and City garage 41.77 3586 MARK HURD AERIAL SURVEYS Topography mapping-Engineering dept. 2,090.00 3587 HANCE HARDWARE, INC. Supplies-Park Maint. 19.95 35:. HARMON GLASS . Windshield 105.84 3589 ERIC HAGEN Services-Packet delivery 140.00 3590 KARULF HARDWARE Supplies 323.16 3591 KARULF HARDWARE Supplies-Fire dept. 3592 KRAEMER'S HARDWARE Supplies 77.38 3593 BDB LAMBERT March expenses 101.75 473 till! March 20, 1979 03-16-79 3594 PAM LESTER Exercise instructions 76.00 3595 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON Legal services 3,078.85 3596 LEEF BROS., INC. Service 107.80 3597 ROBERT MARTZ March expenses 111.00 3598 MEDCENTER HEALTH PLAN March insurance 1,003.20 3599 METRO FANE COMMUNICATIONS Radios-Public Works dept. 35.40 3600 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION April sewer service charges 18,094.55 3601 MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN. Dues-John Fran • 00 3602 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. Truck 26,331.00 3603 MUNICIPAL AND PRIVATE SERVICES (MAPS) February services 769.13 3604 MINNEAPOLIS STAR Employment ad-Public Safety 69.O3 3605 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN. Two office of the year pins 24.00 3606 VOID CHECK 3607 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT Supplies-Engineering dept. 2 25.70.70 3608 MINNEGASCO Service 3609 KATHLEEN MORRISON Dance instructions-Community services 120.00 3610 MERIT PRINTING CO. Office supplies 163.50 3611 M M INDUSTRIES, INC. Car wash powder-Fire dept. and garage 145.54 3612 MINNEAPOLIS GLASS CO. Tempered glass-Park Maint. 96.34 3613 M-V GAS CO. L-P gas-Park Mint. 136.40 3614 METRO PRINTING, INC. Supplies-Assessing dept. • 78.000' 3615 MEDICAL OXYGEN Oxygen-Fire dept. 3616 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIPMENT Recharge extinguishers-Fire dept. 41.25 3617 MINNESOTA BRICK AND TILE Brick-City Hall addition 360.30 3618 MEDINA ELECTRIC, INC. Services-New fire building 59,377.65 3619 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK Bond payment 3620 NORTHWOOD GAS CO. Supplies-Public Works 4.71 4.41 3621 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. Service-Public information 15 3622 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION 40.00 ASSN, Dues-Wally Johnson 122.80 3623 NOREN PRODUCTS, INC. ' Red lights for new squad car1,816.49 3624 NORTHWESTERN BELL Service ,86.69 3625 NORTHERN STATES POWER Service 7.60 3626 OLSEN CHAIN AND CABLE Service-Tree disease dept. .760 3627 PETTY CASH Reimburse fund-Public Safety 187 3628 PROGRESS PUBLISHING CO. Equal opportunity ad 4,18 7 5.0O 3629 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN March insurance 120.00 4 3630 PINK SUPPLY CORP. Towels-Fire dept. 0 0 20. 3631 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING Forms-Public Safety dept. 73.00 3632 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Pop for machine 2.ii00.0I1 3633 ROAD MACHINERY Equipment rental-Tree disease dept. 3634 KELLY ROBERG Dance instructions-Community services 60.00 3635 STREMEL BROS. MFG. CO. Repair door-Water plant 13.009 72 3636 ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL . Blood test-Public Safety24.00 3637 SYSTEMS 3, INC. Tape cassettes-Public Safety 3638 MEG STEVENSON Landscaping instructions-Community 96.00 services dept. 296.00 3639 GORDON SMITH CO. Fuel and lubricants . 229.93 3640 SUBURBAN AUTO ELECTRIC Repair service and parts March Ile. 1979 _ 03-16-79 3641 SEARS ROEBUCK Evil:eat-City Mall 145.87 3642 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CO. Equipment ant 88.07 3643 TIT-STATE TREE SERVICE Hauling diseased trees .00 3644 80B TYSON Expenses-Public Safety dept. 808 3645 TRI-SAFETY SYMBOL.SIB Signs for Skating-rink 39.10 3646 TOWN'S EDGE FORD Equipment parts 28.80 3647 UNITED ADVERTISING Toner far xerox *there 176.53 3648 VAN WATERS&ROGERS Silicofluoride- er dept. 1 080.O0 3649 VIRCO MFG. CORP. Chairs-Fire - 2.373.96 3650 WARTEKA, INC. Burlap-Calenuni-tit services 9_00 3651 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE March ice. 90.20 3652 SttPtaN WHITE School exper►ses-Fire dept. 2.O0 3653 SANDRA WERTS February 42.21 3654 KEITH WALL - Expenses-Public_Safety 14.98 3655 WATER PRODUCTS Repair supplies-Water dept. 1,125.10 3656 XEROX CORPORATION Supplies d s ce 960.26 3657 BATHER, RINORUSt,NORIFELO. JARVIS, GARONER, INC... Boundry su rvey-Miller part 895.00 365E CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO. Ads 70-52 36S9 BATHER, MOROSE, WOLSRLD, GARDNER, INC. Service-Lotus View St. Imp.; Traffic signal THE_8..78th st.; Dell Road 10.485.63 3660 STATE OF MINNESOTA Servi.e-TH16 4 1.078 05 3661 RIEKE-CARR©I L-MULLER ASSOC. Service-Sow Value 6Wr'.; Scar 4.Wtr. trunk Round Lake areas: Well Pause 13; and 6t & Wtr. Country Vista 4$ 91..25 _70— 3662 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED. INC. Unif.+ -Eire dept. and Maio Safety 3,499.22 3663 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Visual aids-Fire dept. 3.75 3664 ROBERTS DRUG Suppiles„.Pybli.c.Safety dept. 2.10 3665 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN. Fire training metals I0 OD 3666 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER Blood testis Safety dept. 60.E 3667 A & K CONSTRUCTION, INC. Contract-Est. No. 5; Well PUMahause • 13 5,182.42 3668 0 & P CONTRACTING, INC. Contract-Est. No. 1; Super value sewer , 400.83. 3669 PETTY CASH Fei rsr dt of fund-City Hall 68.12 3670 SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA Treater tiros-Cemeunity Services 57. 3671 JAMES SALENTINE aasketba11 scorekeeper30.55 3672 CHRIS HOMES a.sketball scorekeeper SAO 3673 DAVID SALENTINE Basketball scorekeeper 23.60 3674 JACK FREDRICKSON e_sketbail.scor+ekeeper 25.85 T3TAL 328.m.92