HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 07/18/1978 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 18, 1978 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers,
Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Roger Pauly; Planner Chris Enger; Finance
Director John Frane; Director of Community
Services Bob Lambert; Engineer Carl Jullie;
and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary
INVOCATION •PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL
I.✓APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JUNE 20, 1978 Page 1689
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Resolution No. 78-131, designating Outlots D and E, Golden Page 1720
Strip Addition for highway purposes
B. Change Order No. 1, I. C. 51-300, Edenview area sewer and Page 1721
water improvements
C. Resolution No. 7B-126, approving the Final Plat for Olympic _ Page 1725
Hills 3rd
D. Resolution No. 78-127, approving the Final Plat for Olympic - Page 1728
Hills 4th
E. ' Resolution No. 78-12B, approving the Final Plat for Hillsborough Page 1731
1st
F. Resolution No. 78-129, approving the Final Plat for Hillsborough Page 1734
2nd
G. Resolution No. 78-130, approving the Final Plat for Garrison Page 1737
Forest 3rd
H. Payment of Claims Nos. 10786 - 10935 Page 1740
I. Set Public Hearing for Gelco PUD and rezoning from Rural b I-5 Page 1744
to Office for approximately 18 acres west of existing Gelco
site and south of W. 78th for August 1, 1978
J. Set Public Hearing for CPT Corporation, request for rezoning Page 1745
of approamately 30 acres from Rural to 1-5 Park for August 1,
1978. Located in NW corner of Scenic Heights Road and Mitchell
Eicr
K. Set Public Hearing for Anderson Lakes Parkway Apartments by The Page 1746
Preserve for rezoning from Rural to RM 2.5 for 126 market rate
rental apartments for August 15, 1978. Located south of Anderson
Lakes Parkway and west of The Preserve Center.
Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,July 18, 1978
i
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
^ ,,5'\„ A. Prairie East 7th, request try Hustad Development Corporation Page 1747
(> to rezone from Rural to RN 6.5 and preliminary plat approval
,, (Resolution No. 78-106 and Ordinance No. 78-31) Continued `�
Public Hearing from July 5, 1978 ,( .
V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS /
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS i a,�d1,,,, �.. Arm
.i C
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-36, establishing the Flying Page 1748
Cloud Airport Advisory Commission of Eden Prairie ,T,,...-4,1s/ 'V
8�,, Resolution No. 78-119, finding No Significant Impact for Page 1750
,,,,,P M Gelco's requested rezoning as outlined in draft Environmental A
Afw" Assessment Worksheet ,,. °n_�:�7,--- —,fa^�-
VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS _
A. Reports of Council Members i" 1 yore 1, r._ , _}
B. Report of City Manager
C. Report of City Attorney
—__A____
D. port of Director of Community Services /_ ,/
1. Joint Master Plan for Anderso,. Lakes (continued from � P
June 28, 1978) . �/2 J 4';f foe I'
(i1,-'�-� 2. LAWC/N Grant Application - Mitchell Lake Page 1783
/
VIII. NEW BUSINESS 11-14 `-
IX. ABJBURNMENT.
' ,
v
,,,,D,./...6, A44-6 v
/ i.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 20, 1978 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers,
Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Roger
• Pauly; Planner Chris Enger; Finance Director
John Frane; Director of Community Services
Bob Lambert; Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce
Provo, Recording Secretary
INVOCATION: Councilman Dave Osterholt
ROLL CALL: Bye, Osterholt, Pauly and Penzel present; Meyers absent.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS DF BUSINESS
The following items were requested to be added to the agenda:
A. Setting date for next Guide Plan Meeting under "New Business"
B. Discussion by Councilman eye on meeting with Metropolitan
Airports Commission under 'Reports of Council members".
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, =o approve the agenda as amended
and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Payment of Claims Nos. 10392 - 1063B
B. Set Public Hearing for Lake Trail Estates for July 5, 1978
C. Set Public Hearing for Norman Addition for July 5, 1978
D. Approve plans and specifications and order advertisement for
bids for sanitary sewer on Eden Road, I. C. 51-320 (Resolution
No. 78-113)
E. Resolution No. 78-115, requesting Minnesota Department of Transportation for
traffic speed survey on Old Flying Cloud Drive
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve items A - E on the Consent
Calendar. Roll Call Vote: Bye, Osterholt, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion
carried'unanimously.
III. MINUTES
A. Minutes of the Board of Review Meeting held Wednesday, June 7, 1978
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the minutes of the
Board of Review held Wednesday, June 7, 1978, as published. Motion carried
unanimously.
i ;l`1)
Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,June 20, 1978
III. MINUTES (continued)
B. Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Wednesday, June 7, 1978
Pg. 4, after the sixth paragraph, add a new paragraph to read as follows:
"Ostenson stated he is prepared to put a drainage pipe in at this time
according to City specifications."
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the minutes of the
City Council held Wednesday, June 7, 1978, as amended and published.
Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Prairie East 7th, request by Hustad Development Corporation, to rezone
from Rural to RM 6.5 and preliminary plat approval (Resolution No.
78-106 and Ordinance No. 78-31)
City Manager Ulstad explained this is a continued Public Hearing from
June 7, 1978, and the proponent is prepared to answer concerns raised by
Council members at that time.
Jim Ostenson, Hustad Development Corporation, explained Hustad is prepared
to put in the necessary pipe to take care of the drainage. He further
commented that Hustad's engineer has met with City Engineer Jullie and the
drainage issue has been resolved and the proponent will begin installation
of the pipe immediately. In addition, Mr. Ostenson stated he has met
with the residents regarding the screening and has visually walked the site
with them, and the residents are in agreement with what the proponents
have proposed. There will be a 25 foot natural strip, plus additional
berming and screening will be provided along the area to satisfy the
residents who will have a definite input as to the type of plants and
spacing.
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated June 15, 1978,
regarding the neighborhood park site in the area of Franlo Road and answered
questions of Council members.
Roger Pollock, 9950 Friar Drive, and Mr. Green, 9935 Friar Drive, expressed
concern over the storm sewer system. Rick Sathre, McCombs-Knutson, outlined
the drainage plan and installation of same.
City Engineer Jullie added that the proposed drainage system as outlined by
Mr. Sathre will work, however, reiterated it is critical the swale is put
in properly. •
Mrs. Green asked who would be sodding the swale. Mr. Ostenson replied
Hustad would be sodding the swale.
Mr. Pollock further questioned how long it would take to have the storm sewer
completed. Ostenson replied it would take about six weeks to install the
storm sewer in the area.
Pollock referred to the easement which runs across lots 11, 12, 13 and lot 1.
Mr. Sathre explained there is not a valid reason why the easement could not be
narrowed, and it would be a matter of asking the Council to vacate a portion of
the easement.
Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,June 20, 1978
A. Prairie East 7th (continued)
Osterholt questioned if the proponents had considered single family.
City Planner Enger replied he had discussed single family homes hi the area
with the proponent, however, Windsor is interested in building the townhouses
and is proposing same.
Pauly commented in reference to Mr. Osterholt's query regarding single family
housing, that the Council is not looking at a new piece of land. This land
has always been propgsed as multiple units and, because of that, to change
the previously existing plan doesn't seem quite right. Pauly felt Hustad's
has also worked out a satisfactory drainage plan and has worked with City
Engineer Jullie on this plan. Therefore, she supports the proposal.
Osterholt felt this proposal is still an intrusion on the single family
neighborhood and he does not feel the setbacks are adequate. Further it
is not doing the single famly homes in the area any good by putting in multiple.
Frank Thomas, 9785 Garrison, he would like to see more setbacks if this were
at all possible.
Ostenson requested of the Council that the Public Hearing on Prairie East 7th
be continued to the July 5th Council meeting.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to continue the Public Hearing on
Prairie East to the July 5th Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Darkenwald Duplexes, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 for 2
existing single family and 52 duplex lots, and preliminary plat approval
(Resolution No. 78-102 and Ordinance No. 78-30)
City Manager Ulstad explained Mr. Darkenwald has requested that this Public
Hearing be continued to the July 5th Council meeting.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to continue the Darkenwald
Duplexes Public Hearing to July 5, 1978. Motion carried unanimously.
V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
No reports.
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-29, rezoning from RM 2.5 to RM 6.5 for one
four-plex and 2 duplex lots for Olympic Hills First Addition, Olympic Hills
Corporation, Outlet and developers agreement
Osterholt questioned if this is the total extent of the Master Plan and if
Olympic Hills Corporation would commit to no further development of the golf •
course. Don McGlynn, Olympic Hills Corporation, stated he would be willing to
give a statement to that effect.
Osterholt asked if Olympic Hills Corporation owns the properties involved.
Mr. McGlynn replied part of the land is owned by The Preserve, and Olympic
Hills Corporation is in a joint venture with The Preserve.
Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,June YU, i is
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-29, Olympic Hills First Addition (continued)
Osterholt further questioned if Mr. McGlynn will agree that the City will not
take over the road as a public street. Mr. McGlynn stated he would be willing
to agree with Mr. Osterholt's request. McGlynn further commented
the private road is available for use by the police and fire department and
they are not trying to use it as a thoroughfare, it would serve abutting
properties. City Engineer Jullie stated it would be a public right-of-way;
however, Olympic Hills Corporation could post it a private road, but there would
be essentially no enforcement. Residents in the area could use it, and also
the police and fire.
• MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt. to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 78-29, rezoning from RM 2.5 to RM 6.5 for one four-plex .
and 2 duplex lots for Olympic Hills First Addition, Olympic Hills Corporation,
Outlot B. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the developers
agreement for Olympic Hills First Addition. Olympic Hills Corporation,
Outlot B. Motion carried unanimously.
8. Resolution No. 78-110, granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial
Development Bonds for Gelco Corporation in the amount of $1,000,000.00
Ci ttle
nes
byttheaCityrandstad recom,nendeded theelco Councilporation considerththesadopt9 ndofiResolutionis{red
No. 78-110.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 78-110,
granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds
for Gelco Corporation in the amount of $1,000,000.00. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Resolution No. 78-111, granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial
Development Bonds for Eaton Char-Lynn in the amount of $1,000,000.00
City Manager Ulstad explained Eaton Char-Lynn meets the guidelines established
by the City and recommended the Council consider the adoption of Resolution
No. 78-111.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 78-111,
granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds
for Eaton Char-Lynn in the amount'of $1,000,000.00. Motion carried
unanimously.
D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-23, Prairie East 8th and 9th, by Hustad
Development Corporation, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 and developers
agreement •
City Manager Ulstad explained Ordinance No. 7B-23 was continued from the
June 7th Council meeting for the purpose of resolving the park issue,
which was part of discussion under item IV. A.
Osterholt asked about tot lots, and to what extent they are going to be
available in the 8th and 9th additions. John Woodland, Windsor Corporation,
explained there will be three tot lots, one in the 8th and one in the 9th
addition, and 1 in the common area between the two.
council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,June 20, 1978
D. 2nd Readin of Ordinance No. 78-23 Prairie East 8th and 9th (continued)
Osterholt questioned if the City would be paying $150,000.00 for the
proposed 20 acre park site. Lambert replied in the affirmative.
Osterholt further commented sometimes when a developer comes in it might
be better for the City to ask for land dedication. Significant factor
is what th it to the
cost the developer, and what the developer
is
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by 8ye, to approve the 2nd Reading of
Ordinance No. 78-23, Prairie East 8th and 9th, by Hustad Development
Corporation, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5. Pauly, Bye and Penzel voted
"aye", Osterholt voted "nay". Motion failed.
Osterholt suggested that reconsideration should be given to the above
motion at a time when five members are present to vote.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by 8ye, to reconsider the previous
motion and continue action on the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-23
to the July 5, 1978 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
E. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No 78-44, street name changes
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 78-44, street name changes. Motion carried unanimously.
F. 2nd Readin of Ordinance No. 78-09 COR Investment rezonin from Rural
to RM 6.5 for 48 du lex units, and 2nd Readin of Ordinance No. 78-10,
COR Investment, rezonin from Planned Stud to Office District for 1
Tice ot, and developers agreement
Osterholt commented he thought there was going to be an access to the
property directly west. City Planner Enger responded an exhibit will
be attached to the developers agreement showing the access to the property
to the west.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the 2nd Reading •
of Ordinance No. 78-09, COR Investment, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 for
48 duplex units. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 7B-10, COR Investment, rezoning from Planned Study to
Office District for 4 Office lot. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterhot moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the developers agreement
for CDR Investment. Motion carried unanimously.
G. 2nd Readin of Ordinance No. 78-15 Hillsborough and Hillsborough 2nd,
The Preserve, rezoning from Rural to R1 13.5 and developers agreement
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 78-15, Hillsborough and Hillsborough 2nd, The Preserve,
rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5. Motion carried unanimously.
•
:.ouncil Minutes - 6 - Tues.,June 20, 1978
G. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-15, Hillsborough and Hillsborough 2nd (continued)
Changes were made in the developers agreement as follows: Page 1,
item 3, 3rd line, strike "as scenic easement", in the last line after
"covenant" add the following language "covering the scenic easement
as delineated on Exhibit "B". Page 2, 3rd line, strike "Outlot A" and
insert in lieu thereof "sceniC easement".
MOTION: 8ye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the developers
agreement as amended. .Motion carried unanimously.
ie
st
H.
HustadaDevelopment�Corporation, rezoning rfrom a l�Rural 5 6th,th and
R1-13.5and
developers agreement
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 78-22, Prairie East 4th, 5th and 6th, Hustad Development
Corporation, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5. Motion carried unanimously.
Additional verbage)o be worked out by City Attorney on page 2, item
7, and an-amendment to item 19 on page 4.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the developers
agreement for Prairie East 4th, 5th and 6th as amended by City Attorney.
Motion carried unanimously.
VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Appointment of one member to the Planning Commission to fill an
unexpired term to 2/28/80
This item was continued to the July 5, 1978 Council meeting.
2. Councilman Bye reported on his meeting with the Metropolitan
Airports Commission regarding the establishment of an advisory
commission for Flying Cloud Airport. Bye distributed the
Policy Statement from M.A.C. pertaining to same.
Council members requested that the ordinance establishing
the advisory commission be placed on the July 5th Council
agenda.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Ratification of Super Valu Stores, Inc., developers agreement for
a corporate headquarters
City Manager Ulstad reviewed the background on Super Valu's developers
• agreement: On May 4th the City sent a preliminary draft of.the developers
agreement to Super Valu for their approval. Super Valu. countered with a
proposal outlining the points that they felt were reasonable, based on the
guidelines and ordinances of the City. As a result of the counter proposal,
Mr. Ulstad requested of the legal counsel of Super Valu to explain by
communication their reasons to substantiate their requested changes in the
draft of the developers agreement, outlined in such communication dated May 3Oth
from Mike Brewer, legal counsel for Super Valu. As a result of that
t.ouncii minutes - i - Iues.,June 20, 1978
1. Ratification of Super Valu Stores, Inc., developers agreement for
a corporate headquarters (continued)
communication, Mr. Ulstad then redrafted the agreement and submitted it
to Super Valu for their review based on what he felt was reasonable
for their consideration. Based on the redraft of the agreement,Super
Yalu still had some items of concern based on rules, regulations and
ordinances of the City. Mr. Ulstad met with Super Valu on June 7th and
reviewed those points that they were still concerned about. At that point
Super Valu asked that in the developers agreement there be a point adopted
as to a deck to extend down to the lake for the purpose of their employees
to enjoy the lake. On June 7th, this item was on the agenda and Mr.
Ulstad explained he was not prepared to outline all changes in the agreement
and asked for “ontinuous-1 special meeting was then set by the Council
for June 12th. --tin ,rune T2tfi the Council did review the redrafted agreement,
and there was discussion relative to the deck and the size. Mr. Ulstad
proceeded, through the City's legal counsel, to change item 3 in the agreement
to address a deck which extends out in the lake approximately 9 feet.
Osterholt questioned where the deck would be located. Mr. Morrissey responded
perpendicular to the cafetoria.
Joel Harding, 7060 Willow Creek Road, read a Statement of Position signed
by residents of The Cove and Willow Creek areas. (Attached as part of
minutes)
Dr. Tangen, member of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission,
spoke on behalf of the Commission regarding their meeting held June lgth,
as outlined in memo dated June 20th by Director of Community Serviras
Lambert. Tangen reiterated it has always been the Commission's position
that the shoreline of Bryant Lake be left in an unaltered state.
Mike Brewer, legal counsel for Super Valu, noted that condition 3 and 10
in the letter of May 30th are part and parcel of the agreement, and it may
appear there is an inconsistency if taken out of context.
Phil Parsons, 6861 Beach Road, Gail Roettger, 6881 Beach Road, Elaine
Sorensen, 7121 Willow Creek Road, Steven Hemping, 6641 Beach Road,
Rayner Larson, 7011 Willow Creek Road, Mary Brill, 7041 Willow Creek Road, •
Mrs. Wilkie, 7221 Willow Creek Road, Don Sorensen, 7121 Willow Creek Road,
Bruce Brill, 7041 Willow Creek Road, Bob Fransen, 6851 Beach Road, Martin
Hellman, 6921 Beach Road, Helen Bergren, Amsden Hills in The Preserve,
Mr. & Mrs. Jim Perkins, 7012 Willow Creek Road, and Jim McNeill, 7251
Willow Creek Road, expressed concerns regarding the Super Valu rezoning,
i.e., if 550 people of Super Valu have a party it may become out of control,
Super Valu could monopolize the lake summer and winter, will set a precedent
for future development, residents were not notified of June 12th Council
meeting, petition submitted does include other points besides the
dock facility and requested reconsideration be taken on position already taken
by the Council, an exact diagram should be provided as to the size of the deck
and configuration of same by Super Valu, residents of The Cove and Willow
• Creek areas are vehemently opposed to anykind of dock on the premises of
Super Valu, Super Valu should occupy the land the way it was made known to
the residents in the first place, Super Valu is attempting to make the
area an employees park which is a detriment to the area does not feel
Super Valu has to use the lake to enjoy it, Super Valu f'ias destroyed their
IG,.,
Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,June 20, 1978
1. Ratification of Super Valu Stores, Inc., developers agreement (continued)
credibility with the residents as they have changed 15 out of the 20 items of the
agreement with them, City should protect the marshes on both ends of the
property, the pond in the middle and two hills and land adjacent thereof,
would like to believe Super Valu could adequately maintain and police this
area, but thinks it is an impossibility, an indepth study of the effect
of the changes in the developers agreement should be provided, afraid
if Super Valu is allowed to put in a dock, that if other office complexes
build on the available 100 acres they might also want a dock, size of the
dock, Bryant Lake is a natural resource for birds and wildlife and questioned
if the dock would have an affect on them, can fish from shore just as easily
as from a dock, Super Valu will cause a significant nuisance with or without
a dock if employees are allowed to come on weekends and have picnics,
Super Valu employees are using the property now and they have stated they
have permission from Super Valu and they have launched boats and canoes,
and if it is a place of business why does Super Valu have to have a dock.
Ulstad explained the same procedure is followed on any 2nd Reading of an
ordinance whereby notices are not sent out. The meeting of June 12th was
set at an open meeting on June 7th.
Bye commented that Eden Prairie needs a solid tax base. We have some fine
industrial concerns that are contributing. This should be one of our finest
moments to gain an industrial office user whey they lease their warehouse
in Hopkins and put one gigantic facility out here in Eden Prairie. Some
of these 500 people may buy homes out here and increase our ability to provide
the services we have now. If you get into an economical question, the industrial
office concern takes out of the City significantly less than what they put back
in.it In thi case e is hould the doesdock SupereValuowed or should
walk away.
John Morrissey, Vice President - Distribution, Super Valu, explained they
do not intend to be an employee picnic area. Do not intend people should picnic
during off hours and would not make it attractive for them to do so. Basic
intent is to keep it as an attractive place of business.
Charles Dugan, Vice President - Legal & Insurance, Super Valu, stated they
would reasonably police it.
Bye asked Mr. Morrissey: 1) Now that you have listened to the discussion
have you and your group representing Super Valu any adjustments that you could
propose to the over water dock as far as square footage cstionn rned, and ned,vamdn2) if
you were granted a certain square footage what, if any,
would Super Valu be willing to work with.
Dr. Tangen requested that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
be made part of the involvement.
A brief recess was called for Super Valu to respond to questions raised by
Councilman Bye.
Meeting reconvened and Mr. Morrissey stated Super Valu would be receptive
to a docking facility consisting of the following: 6 feet over the water,
40 feet in width, for a total of 240 square feet , and 560 square feet on land,
for a total of 800 feet. Mr. Morrissey commented that Super Valu would be willing
to consult with the residents of Bryant Lake, but feel Super Valu has to have the
•
Council Minutes - 9 - Tues.,June 2D, 1978
1. Ratification of Super Valu Stores, Inc., developers agreement (continued)
final approval. Reluctant to work with the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission.
Bed
s to
aill new8eaa , member of twistnnot requiring hpeople e ntogcome back with tat future ssite m be
plan.
Penzel responded it was felt the floodplain management plan was of an adequate
nature to require the proponents to come back to the City in any case.
Dr. Tangen felt this is not an issue that just concerns the citizens of
Bryant Lake, it concerns entire citizens of Eden Prairie. The Parks, Recreation
& Natural Resources Commission is charged with the responsibility of natural
resources and they should be a part of any further discussion.
MOTION: Dsterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to ratify the PUD developers agreement
•
with changes dated 6/20/78, including the amendements concerning the
dock facilities,using square footage figures of 6 teet over the water, 4D
feet in width, for a total of 240 square feet, and 56D square feet on land,
for a total of 80D square feet. Further that the proposal for the structure
be submitted for review by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
and the City Council, and that it be made accessible to the residents in the
immediate area. Super Valu shall provide such security with respect to Parcel BB
as shall be reasonably necessary to prevent the use of Parcel BB by its employees
and invitees or trespassers thereon in such a manner as to create a public
nuisance to the residents in the area, and if security is not sufficient, that
this be brought to the attention of the city Council. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Report of City Attorney
No report.
D. Report of Planning Director
1. Housing and Redevelopment Authority agreement between Hennepin County
and City of Eden Prairie (Resolution No. 78-109)
MOTION: Dsterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 7B-109,
requesting Hennepin County to apply for Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
Home Improvement Grant Funds for implementation within the City of Eden
Prairie. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Dsterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to continue the Council meeting past the
scheduled adjournment time of 11:30 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Joint Master Plan for Anderson Lakes (continued from June 7, 1978)
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Bye,`to continue this item to the July
18, 1978 Council meeting when a representative of the Hennepin County
Park Reserve District will be available. Motion carried unanimously.
16,9
Council Minutes - 10 - Tues.,June 20, 1978
E. Report of Director of Community Services (continued)
2. Eden Prairie Stables Lease (continued from June 7, 1978)
Director of Community Services Lambert requested that letters from
Wayne Kinion, Quentin Robley, Bill Anderson and R. T. Mulcrone be
entered into the record. (Attached as part of minutes) Lambert spoke
to his memo dated June 16 and answered questions of Council members.
Glen Lorenz, lessee of the Eden Prairie Stables, agreed with the
fact they will have to wait for the Metropolitan Council to act on something
as far as funds afe concerned and would be willing to wait for construction
and the new development. However, Mr. Lorenz requested the City do some
minor improvements to the site for the benefit of maintaining the
property in its present state.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve a 3 years lease
for Eden Prairie Stables at $428.00 as of 6/1/78, and an increase of
7% for the following two years, with the provision that if a major
facility is being considered that it be brought back before the Council.
Further, that the Council• charge the staff to clean up the area and do
minor improvements. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Northwestern Bell request
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated June 16, 1978
regarding the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission's action
of June 5, 1978.
Mr. George Soash, Northwestern Bell, appeared before the Council
speaking to their request.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the recommendation
of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission of June 5, 1978,
as outlined in memo from Director of Community Services Lambert dated
June 16, 1978. Motion carried unanimously.
F. Report of City Engineer
1. Consider bids for utility and street improvements in Norseman Industrial
Park 2nd Addition, I. C. 51-319 (Resolution No. 78-112)
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to award the bid for utility
and street improvements in Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition,
I. C. 51-319, to the lowest responsible bidder, Northdale Construction
Company, in the amount of $244,193.50. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Bye,
Pauly and Penzel doted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
2. Receive 100% petition and order advertisement for the Crosstown Industrial
Park, I.C. 51-329 (Resolution No. 78-114)
• MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No.
78-114, ordering improvements and preparation of plans and specifications
for public improvements in the Crosstown Industrial Park 1st and 2nd
Addition, I. C. 51-329. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Minutes - 11 - Tues.,June 20, 1978
3. Request from The Preserve for discussion of grading operations on
the site of proposed Amsden Hills IV Addition
Lee Johnson, The Preserve, spoke to his communication dated June 14, 1978.
City Engineer Jullie explained this matter is before the Council because
of questions raised by the residents. Mr. Jullie stated he agrees with the
concept of stockpiling, but uncomfortable issuing a grading permit when
The Preserve is coming around the corner with a zoning proposal. Suggested
Mr. Johnson come before the Council for direction.
Jim Edwards, 10260 Amsden Way, stated he is at the Council meeting to try
and understand the procedure that should be followed. It is his understanding
that after a 1st hearing on Amsden IV, the next morning The Preserve was out
grading. Mr. Edwards assumed The Preserve had a permit to go ahead and grade,
however, found out 4 or 5 days later they didn't. He further stated he would
like to feel the residents have some protection by City ordinances. Further
Mr. Edwards feels the action taken by The Preserve is a gross violation of the
procedure to be followed.
Jullie explained after he had been notified of the grading, he called Mr.
Johnson and asked him to cease all grading operations and they complied.
Osterholt stated if this happens again the City would have no alternative
but to assess a fine to The Preserve. Mr. Johnson said he understood
that this could happen.
Gary Wegner, 10220 Amsden Way, explained that a call was placed in the morning
to stop the earth moving and it continued to 5:00 PM. Mr. Johnson explained
it took him a full day to find out they were in violation.
No action necessary.
4. Discussion of proposed transportation program
City Manager Ulstad explained last week at the Chamber of Commerce
meeting a presentation was made on behalf of the City Council outlining
proposed improvements relative to collector streets in our City. A report
was handed out and encouragement was given to the Chamber for their input.
The Development Commission will be going over the report on Wednesday.
Mr. Ulstad further stated he would like to sit down with the Transportation
Committee of the Chamber to go through the whole process.
Betty McNulty, representing the Chamber of Commerce, apologized for the way
the meeting was held. Commended City Manager Ulstad and staff for an
outstanding job and an excellent report.
No action necessary.
• G. Report of Finance Director
1. I.OGIS Agreement
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the LOGIS Agreement
as recommended by Finance Director Frane. Motion carried unanimously.
/C,`)`'J
Council Minutes - 12 - Tues.,June 20, 1978
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Setting date for next Guide Plan Meeting
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to set Tuesday, June 27, 1978,
as a Special Council Meeting to discuss the Guide Plan. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Penzel asked if anyone would like to attend a meeting on Labor Relations
at the Ambassador Hotel on June 29. City Manager Ulstad was selected to attend
this meeting.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adjourn the Council meeting at
12:57 AM. Motion carried unanimously.
•
11U
CT?.T„':T OF FOGITION
TO: TH7 CITY fl F-?J PPAIRT? and
STC,..,, I.JCCRP07AT:M
The undersigneJ, residents of The Cove and 'Allow Creek areas, desire to
apprise the City of den Prairie and super Valu of their considered opinion rc—
gardi.ne the proposed `super Valu Home Office development on property abutting
3ryant's Long- Lake.
1. That considering the alternate development possibilities of the site, r:e
support the concept of a high quality office use of the property in question to
the extent that such use is sensitive to the terrain and ecology of the site,
consistent with preserving as much of the existing natural amenities as is rea—
sonably nossible, and compatible with other pre—existing uses of properties ad—
joining the lake.
2. That several months ago, we, in good faith, designated a committee of
our residents to meet with Super Valu, express the areas of our concern, and
attempt to arrive at a mutually agreeable concept and proposal. Thereafter, a
meeting of the residents, officers of Super Valu, and representatives of 'caper
Values architects was held to acquaint the residents with the details of the pro—
posal, whereat additional concerns of the residents were discussed and certain
representations and agreements were made by Super Valu.
3. That a majority, although not all, of the residents approved the pro—
•
posal as it was originally presented to the City's Planning Commission and
Council,as we believed the twenty (2(1) provisions attached to the proposal by the
Council and the representations of Super Valu would serve to acknowledge and pro—
vide a means of control regarding our concerns.
4. That almost all of the undersigned are not knowledgeable in land use
planning and zoning procedures nor trained in the law and we, therefore, trusted
in the integrity of Super Valu and in our elected officials to effectuate •,hat,
•
we understood to be our agreement, but we now realize that we did not receive a
full disclosure of proposal's details and its effects.
5. That we received no notice, either formally or informally, of the special
meeting of the City Council held on Monday, June 12, 1978, but rather learned of
the same by chance. That at that meeting a substantially different proposal *•.as
presented. S:e, further, did not learn of the full impact of the changes until
after this special council meeting. •
U. That now that we have had an opportunity to become informed of the de—
tails of the revised proposal, we are deeply disappointed and dismayed by the
actions of Super Valu, which we believe to be directly contrary to its previous
representations to us. Also, we are shocked that our City Council would even con—
sider, much less adopt,this plan without affording us adequate notice of and time
to evaluate this revised plan, which apparently is contrary to the advice and
recommendations of not only the City's staff but its advisory commissions as
7. That we strongly urge both our City Council and super Yalu to reconsider
their actions and to adopt an agreement Which is et least as responsive to our
concerns as the Ile—soning .Agreement proposed by the City of '.den Prairie on "ay
4, 1978. •
8. That apart from other considerations, we are vehemently opposed to the I'
grantinr'hy the City of any permission to Super Valu for any dock facilities or
other structures below the 854 foot elevation on the site.
I
'aV ti
... '-.'"'4: .''' ''' \ .c "--- , ,..i., , ,,-. •
Po f � n n
,: ,,',\. !.--,,,..,5''' -1-'' c'''. ,,_ :.:'tr‘''...\''''
O
% •
f
C ` N J O , \ n
':
% I::
,� _ f,
41110. 1 , }, .
t .
�
1
.;',..
. .
.. .
. ?
( ,.. -
,‘'1
1" ...
,..1
•
I
i
i
.. ... ...._--
.•
•
.1.--
t.. ,,....
'Ilil'r
1 . ,
1
i
. ,
_ ...
7
•
••
•.
,1
.
2.
• N.,
,
-
dp
t•
§ r
•
•
•
•
{
C)41-(1
'i
4
i
i
`l
I
7
I
•
I')09
•
•
•
6401 Shady Oak Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
June 7, 1978
•
Mr. Robert Lambert
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Lambert,
I am writing to urge that the City of Eden Prairie renew the lease
for Eden Prairie Stables with Bert and Alice Lear. I believe that having
horses and riding facilities is a good use of this park land and tax
money. There are many people currently served there in this way. Since
I live near the stables, I have a definite preference for horses.and
horse-riding over other, noisier forms of recreation.
Bert and Alice are good neighbors and I believe they are a wholesome
influence on the young people who come there to ride and on those who
work there.
I believe it would improve their morale to have a long-term lease,
and think it would enable them to better manage the program and facilities
if they could plan to be there for at least five years.
Sincerely,
Wayne Kinion
t1
- t
ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY
(_ E, COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
• Department of Special Education
St.Cloud,Minnesota 5b30I
(612)'255 2041
June 2, 1978
Mr. Glen D. Lorenz
Advance Corporation
287 Lafeyette Road South
St. Paul, MN 55107
Dear Mr. Lorenz:
I am writing to you at the request of Mr. Murphy with whom I have discussed
your programs and plans. I hope to have the opportunity to visit with you
in the near future. I would like to share with you some facts and comments
about handicapped persons and horses.
The most important goal for any handicapped person is the development of a
good feeling of self-worth. This is true regardless of the nature of the
handicap, whether a person is hearing impaired, blind, orthepedically
capped, retarded or different in other ways enough to have adjustment pro-
blems with the mainstream of American life. The best way to assist persons
in developing good feelings about themselves is the development of indepen-
dence, which means learning certain skills, adjusting according to their
environment, and giving and expecting responsibility of the individual
according to his or her capabilities. There are numerous examples where a
variety of activities in the horse industry have helped develop skills and
lead to a much improved self-concept for handicapped persons. Without
reviewing the numerous horse programs which have been successful, just con-
sider the possibilities. First there is the relationship between a person
and the horse, it automatically places responsibility on the person for care,
feeding, grooming, shelter, and medical attention. Horses make an unusually
good animal for this relationship to develop. The horse responds to con-
sistency and conditioning and their behavior is very predictable using a
basic set of rules. Generally handicapped persons have learned consistency
is necessary for their functioning, pair this with a horse and you have a
natural team. Next consider the physical aspects of horse care, riding, or
driving. These activities promote the development of coordination, balance,
strength, and general health. These physical benefits are probably the most
obvious benefits because they are directly observable.
There are many other benefits which may be derived from a horse program
for handicapped persons:
till
Mr. Glen D. Lorenz
June 2, 1978
Page 2
1. Motivation to get involved and interested in other hobbies
and activities.
2. The chance to work and interact with others with a common
interest. •
3. The chance to solve problems and strive for improvement.
4. The feeling of accomplishment gained when involved in
activities not normally associated with handicapped persons.
5. Training which could lead to employment.
6. An outlet for using leisure time in a productive manner.
Economically, there are no programs for the handicapped that do not have a
tremendous payoff for the American Public. Everytime a handicapped citizen
is able to become more independent it represents a great economic advantage
to tax payers over that persons lifetime.
From a moral point of view it is certainly our responsibility to provide the
best of all possible options for handicapped persons to allow them to develop
to their full potential. In every field where the handicapped have beer
allowed to be involved, employment, the arts, sports, etc, they have usually
exceeded the expectations of the persons involved. Give them the opportunity,
provide the options, and they will not let you down, but will probably sur-
prise you.
I heartily endorse the development of your program in order to provide more
options for handicapped persons. It is my understanding that your program
is carefully planned and the staff is well-trained and competent. I urge
everyone to provide the support necessary to make this program work.
Sincerely,
Quentin Robley
Asst. Professor, Special Education
QR:jk
1')12
£un1er 94;1 514gte
i90 i 2 A,wKw;Anoka
qS 7oso
Motes -
ota, nonce Cpu.nci�
impeetta arta approved 3Ea.tLe.
April 28, 1978
i
•
Mr. Glen D. Lorenz
287 Lafayette Road South
St. Paul, MN 55107
Dear Mr. Lorenz:
This letter is in regards to your inquiry about Bunker Hills
Stable. The stable is located in Bunker Hills County Park in
Anoka. It is owned by the County of Anoka, and is operated by
Rainbow Trails, Inc., as a lease agreement. The facilities and
name are owned by the county. The ho~^es, equipment, and employees
are of Rainbow Trails, Inc. We offer trail rides, hay rides, rid-
ing lessons, and show ring facilities.
This arrangement is beneficial to Anoka County, the leasee,
but is mostly beneficial to the public. Approximately 20,000
people used the horse facilities last year. These people would
not have been able to enjoy this beautiful facility if it were
not for a private business operating within the park.
If you have any further questions, please call me at 757-7010.
Sincerely yours,
•
Bill Anderson
P'anager
djp
•
•
3
MINNESOTA
+ •=• CORRECTIONS BOARD
- NE O
!lay 11, 1973
To Whom It May Concern:
•
Pecreational outlets are important counterbalances to the idleness •
which often leads both young people and adults alike into delinquency
and crime.
I have recently been made aware of the Eden Prarie '.tables and the
possibility of its being forced to close. I would hope that those who
must make that decision will weigh carefully its impact. Those committed
to horse rearing and showing are a unique group of people whose efforts
strengthen family ties, teach young people responsibility, show concern •
for other living things, and augment public recreational dollars. Any
one of those efforts would be sufficient reason for the continuance of
the Eden Irarie Stables. Cumulatively, the fulfillment of those efforts
is an important part of the social health of any community. While
everyone who participates in the Eden Frarie Stables may not be from
that community, the need for the facility and the over-riding social
good resulting are powerful arguements for its continuance.
I am hopeful that thoughtful persons will be able to resolve any
public health concerns and esthetic flaws while allowing the Stable
to continue its important social contribution.
Si ce ly,j
R. . llul crone, Chairman
Minnesota Corrections Board
RTM/m
•
•
•
I1►q
SUITE 238 METRO SQUARE BUILDING • SEVENTH AND ROBERT STREETS • ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55101
•
•
WE, the undersigned, support the continued operation of Eden Prairie
Stables by.the current management, and request that the City of Eden
Prairie provide a long-term lease and make requested improvements for
the following reasons:
1) EPS has proven itself to be a place where entire families can
enjoy the pleasures of horsemanship. It provides a special
recreational opportunity for many young people, who otherwise might
have many idle hours.
2) EPS provides an opportunity for young and old alike to improve
their skills and add to their knowledge of riding and horses.
3) EPS has proven the excellent quality of its training and
instruction through the many awards received at competitive horse
shows throughout the area.
4) EPS provides employment for private citizens and is not a burden
on the taxpayers of tke city.
5) EPS is an irreplaceable facility in terms of location, and its
loss would cause hardship to many who cannot utilize stables located
far out in the countryside.
Anc%vnr, 15C90•,,t,
nn P L(1 _�_� ,
� 130Y1n f\CY �004 I I���P Cc� R� t � Aim, 3 q
�R<Chri`, 1 (., lk,ilit.4 1. 5`C3�1
11�t� f'•ItZti+.l 14}(*) fl i„9•.� %1� 1'„_ J f,
P. ;
Pr�xrnP. F`_r1rnP� 'lb iSUC� �,�«�� ".�� • �,a�,_„ ., .
•
h, { :.ram 11"; 1 ., n�-u,1 •T..,, . '..r1 h., .. �)� ,L�:' ,: f{�
abb��li i ,ily��x.,af � �??± l ,2kc ,t, , 4 i3
oCA,,,,, 5/0/ w://.'slon Rd, 55393
Pi E.r,.•
>Scl G .-? k.r• o,Vla. ,1;,< 41,
C.AQL.t 13ik411 15-7#7 lioap4ATe fp,W. PIT kit 1Mj,
L i ; ,;,•
O.JA ��,.� �2�.;� errM. �4 h.) 1)ti 93'
�fo erI.a.,, Jc- ;7 n 414"PO/n2
3`yj r.l.,s �,S Vt,w4 "'Ann
1115 ,41i)
WE, the undersigned, support the continued operation of Eden Prairie
Stables by the current management, and request that the City of Eden
Prairie provide a long-term lease and make requested improvements for
the following reasons:
1) EPS has proven itself to be a place where entire families can
enjoy the pleasures of horsemanship. It provides a special
recreational opportunity for many young people, who otherwise might
have many idle hours.
2) EPS provides an opportunity for young and old alike to improve
their skills and add to their knowledge of riding and horses.
3) EPS has proven the excellent quality of its training and
instruction through the many awards received at competitive horse
shows throughout the area.
4) EPS provides employment for private citizens and is not a burden
on the taxpayers of the city.
•
5) EPS is an irreplaceable facility in terms of location, and its
loss would cause hardship to many who cannot utilize stables located
far out in the countryside.
rro •
/ t t6a..e.
e:in r� 4611.tp W-5 3t�e 11d.,1f !(�'
'ri�yyx'.�a rr)t�V ��.[ 1:�1��L;;L� �k_Nt.� ,v •
h„s "3
tifr.liV Z., •
- y
s\ti\ �. ,1�� ` tip — \k`-,
79 , a.,ti::-‘ . •
,.�Nrus- 0"Ltk r�y1,�,.
0
)i4 1(4 2 )•&'
ex) k'z\ • L:tit,c4". Cc.—`,1) tiNes
/VG
I
WE, the undersigned,
gn , support the continued operation of Eden Prairie
Stables by the current management, and request that the City of Eden
Prairie provide a long-term lease and make requested improvements for
the following reasons:
1) EPS has proven itself to be a place where entire families can
enjoy the pleasures of horsemanship. It provides a special
recreational opportunity for many young people, who otherwise might
have many idle hours.
2) EPS provides an opportunity for young and old alike to improve
their skills and add to their knowledge of riding and horses.
3) EPS has proven the excellent quality of its training and
instruction through the many awards received at competitive horse
shows throughout the area.
4) EPS provides employment for private citizens and is not a burden
on the taxpayers of the city.
5) EPS is an irreplaceable facility in terms of location, and its
loss would cause hardship to many who cannot utilize stables located
far out in the countryside.
+h (?d& ;,
�-.�r. ? kh/ '311i...._Le: '416
G/t ' " /)? KA
214 i 7 J774-Kir
"771t, e:77.,..,,,...? -Se gttee •
'e_ 4 .t..44f.f.,,,e.4. !
' nc9 .g - -4
• ):-"%-:., ,
n iPZ01,F((1.'Yti 4
ri
-
-� u 11.1V) 0 kotn. a rm P zsa F.
Jimu7(( �/p c /iq fivi/1I/
414.deaik,;„„ ilea_ (,,,,,,..L.L.,
t DAciotlpgr ( /Art .......
r.
WE, the undersigned, support the continued operation of Eden Prairie
' Stables by the current management, and request that the City of Eden
Prairie provide a long-term lease and make requested improvements for
the following reasons:
1) EPS has proven itself to be a place where entire families can
enjoy the pleasures of horsemanship. It provides a special
recreational opportunity for many young people, who otherwise might
have many idle hours.
2) EPS provides an opportunity for young and old alike to improve
their skills and add to their knowledge of riding and horses.
3) EPS has proven the excellent quality of its training and
instruction through the many awards received at competitive horse
shows throughout the area.
4) EPS provides employment for private citizens and is not a burden
on the taxpayers of the city.
5) EPS is an irreplaceable facility in terms of location, and its
loss would cause hardship to many who cannot utilize stables located .
far out in the countryside.
•
-t l4(2c y'64 --&1,(3 Ff-i..)-ur0.) Ore/•. E0 , prA,�,c
2jo • �. fR - iiy'-i/ ,„2.......?rCr�t. _J _t.shc c,
,e[cilit, , /5--in � L. Pttr r�„
- u.,.,: ;i
yla l',{a„,,,. f k 9,:,Dtj�D t 1 n
-
M1 ..ro. c r•hrn,r RQn ,0^n9 rr ,'. ,l..
,
355i t"�,N,kaloq J'I11�-,—
(2 it . . ,,
. ",;t::.,..ir\"74r-°LI-'?) 4 p-(
6-1 u r ha d O {tr ra t
,r ,
J'+`Qlri..<h"-• t0 4;111VE 't
• Qlt_ /.del
vC Irani, r(`,ci,tArr , S-1-eau!, f m6
a-�1 C.1 py A (/`.-'-,,---.1� �j- --.-� —-
WE, the undersigned, support the continued operation of Eden Prairie
Stables by the current management, and request that the City of Eden
Prairie provide a long-term lease and make requested improvements for
the following reasons:
1) EPS has proven itself to be a place where entire families can
enjoy the pleasures of horsemanship. It provides a special
recreational opportunity for many young people, who otherwise might
have many idle hours.
2) EPS provides an opportunity for young and old alike to improve
their skills and add to their knowledge of riding and horses.
3) EPS has proven the excellent quality of its training and
instruction through the many awards received at competitive horse
• shows throughout the area.
4) EPS provides employment for private citizens and is not a burden
on the taxpayers of the city.
5) EPS is an irreplaceable facility in terms of location, and its
loss would cause hardship to many who cannot utilize stables located
far out in the countryside.
4.
if
r 7iii/-na r,
•
•
cck�Ll�Y:c
oJ v4t—`J`'l
•
?•.M'
`� 1111
July 18, 1978
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 78-131
DESIGNATING OUTLOTS D 8 E, GOLDEN
STRIP ADDITIONS, FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES
•
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follo:as:
That Outlots D and E, Golden Strip, have
been acquired by the City of Eden Prairie
for Highway purposes.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Woi fgang H.Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
•
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
/P0
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: July 14, 1978
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1
I.C. 51-300
The attached Change Order No. 1 for the Eden View area and Kurtz Lane utility
improvements, I.C. 51-300, is submitted for Council Approval.
The Change Order covers several amendments to the construction plans which
became necessary because of soil conditions, easement negotiations and
requests for additional improvements. A brief explanation each change is
described in the Change Order form. We have a 100% petition on file cover-
ing all the work under Item No. 6 on Kurtz Circle ($7,120). The net change
resulting from this Change Order is $14,781.00,representing 2.26% of the
original contract amount.
Recommend approval of Change Order No. 1 I.C. 51-300.
CJJ:kh
•
r7.;/
•
MI ilk
i CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
JUNE 20, 1978
SCHEDULE OF AOJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES
PROJECT: Kurtz Lane & Eden View Addition ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 771042
Utility Improvements
OWNER: Eden Prairie, Minnesota CONTRACT OATE: October 25, 1977
OWNER'S PROJECT NO. 51-300
1. Alignment Changes & Addition of Storm Sewer - Plan Sheet 4
With the cooperation of the Hennepin County Highway Oepartment, the alignment
of sanitary sewer from the connection to existing sewer to Manhole 19 is
revised. This will allow the use of PVC in lieu of OIP for approximately 370
feet of this alignment and will result in a reduction in the average depth
of the sanitary sewer over this alignment.
At the request of residents on Lots 2 and 3 of Kutcher's First Addition, an
existing ditch on the west side of County Road No. 4 is to be filled. To
accomodate drainage, 4 catch basins and 250 feet of storm sewer must be installed
along the alignment of the filled ditch. Restoration of the fill area will
require additional topsoil and sod.
The changes in existing contract quantities and addition of new contracting
quantities is summarized as follows:
Delete 157 LF 8" DIP Sewer Pipe ( 8'-10') @ $15.00 $ 2,355.00
Delete 116 LF 8" DIP Sewer Pipe (10'-12') @ $15.50 1,798.00
Oelete 1I LF 8" DIP Sewer Pipe (12'-14') @ $16.50 181.5D
Delete 40 LF 8' DIP Sewer Pipe (16'-18') @ $18.50 740.00
Delete 235 LF 8" DIP Sewer Pipe (18'-20') @ $20.50 4,817.50
Delete 5.8 LF Extra Depth Manhole @ $70.00 406.00
Delete 2.4 LF 8" Drop Section @ $80.00 192.00
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $ 10,490.00
Add 65 LF 8" PVC Sewer Pioe ( 0'- 8') @ $10.50 $ 682.50
Add 48 LF 8" PVC Sewer Pipe ( 8'-10') @ $11.00 528.00
Add 93 LF 8" PVC Sewer Pipe (10'-12') @ $12.00 1,116.00
Add 141 LF 8" PVC Sewer Pipe (12'-14') @ $13.50 1,903.50
Add 23 LF 8" PVC Sewer Pipe (14'-16') @ $14.50 333.50
Add 163 LF 8" DIP Sewer Pipe ( 0'- 8') @ $14.50 2,363.50
Add 51 LF 8" DIP Sewer Pipe (14'-16') @ $17.50 892.50
Add 1 Connect to Existing Manhole @ 51,000.00 1,000.00
Add 500 SY Topsoil & Sod @ 1.50 750.00
*Add 150 LF 15" CMP Storm Sewer @ $15.00 2,250.00
*Add 100 LF 18" CMP Storm Sewer @ $15.00 1,500.00
*Add 4 EA Catch Basins @ $ 500.00 2,000.00
*Add 40 TONS Bituminous Base (2331) @ $ 7.50 300.00
TOTAL AODITIONS $ 15,619.50
*NEW CONTRACT QUANTITIES
^m._--l--__ /
'
' DATED_Ovne-2n. 1978
rxoJccT: ,u/tz Lane x m�n view Xoxidvn pwsIwsEo's PROJECT NO. /D[w'
utility 1.*.o,^�^ts
ouwrxAcT cmE' October 25, `
nuen: r«an rmoie, xw
NO. 5�'.100
"
ou�m�ma
TO: ��r`wx�r��� ��zm'mtioo-_ __-__-'-__- -- —'
-_ `
xw A"c m^.c�m TO *Ks THE o.Aw,�s NOnso Lsuw IN THE suajzCT CONI z Ikx: �
�
c, _/itvulf�xn Prairie u':_------------------------ {
ozc:___
m^rua�- OF THE cy^^Ga See atmcw'd schedule |
sc'cs:,'s'
Revised-Plan Sheet #q
--- '----'- -'-----' '---------'— ------ ---' --'- --
r'e c�IA^GEs csm.o IN THE ,cumx,wm ^DJms,ME°r OF om.Tn^cr FR,cr ^wu n^E:
ccw,n^c` mcc rn/on TO THIS o'�wos oma"
NET (Iwc°cA,e) etsvLr,wo FROM THIS o"mN,-,, w,:)cn $_ 14./x1`uo
/~cm�''"s THIS oy=,= oac,n
cD�,7~,ZT n,c m'uv ,v m`s oa:ss -_--_�A`E"'-AF DAY
NET / n�SULr'ws FROM THIS ce"ws n"oep u^-
c�--~r o-Cca.o n,!--- IcusI~s THIS c*,�E m,,o" C^.�"-A�, mn,
�����.---- ----'f��-��VE-�����s�RE-����v.-- ' ---
—RIEVE CT.2ROLL �SOC AUS. IN _���� _--_
sc�/:�x ' ' Cm"/^°..cv
mxu—�l�-�` ' ' .�-_--__- _'----_-------'--'-- — —'--
�
'
. t 1
,
/
2. Chanoe DIP Sanitary Szwer to PVC Sanitary Serer
Approxinately 4,000.LF of sanitary sewer on County Road !io. 4 and Town Line Road
is scheduled to be DIP becuase of the close proximity to v:aten;ain. This sp ci-
fication is revised to allow the use of SDR 26 PVC .,'eting ",:;A sprcifirati„ns for
waterr.ain r,aterial.
•
DEDUCT S4,100.00
3. Revise Sanitary Sewer Alignments on Town Line Road
Field revisions to sanitary sewer alignments on Town Line Road at Manholes 31 and
32 result in the following quantity and cost adjustments:
Delete 95 LF 8" DIP Sewer Pipe (10'-12') @ $15.50 $1,412.50
Delete 63 LF 8" DIP Sewer Pipe (12'-14') @ $16.50 1,039.50
Delete 1 Standard Manhole i $100.00 /(�0.00
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $3,212.00
Add 78 LF 8" DIP Sewer Pipe ( 8'-I0') @ $15.00 $1,1.70.00
(/. TOTAL ADDITIONS 51,170.00
4. Revise Sanitary Sewer Alignments on Kurtz Lane
Field revisions to sanitary sewer alignments on Kurtz Lane at Manh:les 1, 2, 7 3 6
result in the following quantity and cost adjustri.ents:
Delete 35 LE 8" PVC Sewer Pipe ( 0'- 8') @ $11.00 S TE.F•.00
Delete 209 LF 8" PVC Sewer Pipe (10'-12') @ $12.00 S2,508.00
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $2, -43.00
Add 1'1 LF 8" VCP Sewer Pipe ( 8'-IC') @ 511.50 5.1_96C.50 •
1OTA ADDITIONS S1,968.5D
5. Correction of Street Suh<raJe Deficiencies
•
In certain areas of the project existing sulcr;,de soils cannot IT rt as ;.ab;)'
condi:ic.,jto provide an i'dequate working alatfcnn for the place.,:ent of bitu`ino'us
base. Thee are ge'o rally sr,ali isolated pockets of silty soils or soils of hioh
or ,nic cor.t•rnt. It is . .coro.,cnded that ti, se areas he ...; cut and su :_t,le
L.e.erials s;.5stitu'ed so prcvice the r.zccs,.ary stat,ility in t ,il ;r;ris
fe t _'' .. A co;..b tiou of the Use of sC..c. :.,'.al f 0::
ot. r areas of the pru; .at and crushed rgr:>r.ate ::-.aterials :;.,tors r.'+st fi.as�bic.
The r;co.:G:;cn:ed program budget is as follows:
/123
S,,t,cut unsuitable S.u7rdc soils a .d 1.-place with select
r;,atr:rial from other streets within project area
1,500 CY @ 2.00 = $3,000.00
Subcut unsuitable subgrade soils and replace
with 1 1/2" crushed quarry rock
1060 Tons @ 5.00 • = 55,300.00
10IAL AbD1T1C'';AL COST _k,300.00
•
6. Gr?ding, Stc_lr, Sewer & Curb & Gutter on Kurtz Circle I
The follor.iny quantities not included in the original contract, shall be •
added to cor.plete construction of Kurtz Circle.
Grading Lump Sum $1,150.00
100 LF - 15" CMP Storm Sewer @ $17.50 1,750.00
1 Catch Easin @ S500.00 500.00
400 LF E.P. ipuntable Curb & Gutter @ S8.05 3,220.00
0.25 Acre Topsoil & Seed @ $2000.00 __500.00
TOTAL ADDITIONS $7,120.00
,r
•
7. ,4ddjt on- tp,'1oecee.. =r..S,'.rY.i-ce.5—
•
Revise two 4" =.;ered sewer services crossings of County Road No. 4 to a •
6" sewer service installed in a 20" steel casing with cicancut at
the teorr:ation of the service.
Add Au;ered Service Revisions @ lump Sum S1,300.00
SJ`,: RY OF r''OiT1C:S A.ND DFLETICNS
.ITEM a,? ADDITIONS UELET'C'NS
•
1 515,619.50 SiC,L90.00
2 0- 4,100.00
3 1,170.00 3,212.00
4 1.966.50 2,893.00
5 • 8,300.00 -C-
6 7,120.00 -0-
7 1,300.00
TCrAIS 525,476.00 S20,E95.00
•
Net change is an addition to the contract amount of S14,781.00.
/?2((
CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 78-126
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
OLYMPIC HILLS THIRO ADO.
WHEREAS, thg plat of Olympic Hills Third Addition has been submitted
in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proce_dinys have
been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EOEN PRAIRIE
A. Plat Approval Request for Olympic Hills Third Addition is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
Report on this plat dated July 10, 1978.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8,
Subd. 1 waiving the six month maximum time elapse bete:?an the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
plat as described in said Engineer's Report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy
of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Oeed and/or
Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358,
Subd. 3.
0. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above
named plat.
E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions:
ADOPIEO by the City Council on•
Wolfgang H. Penzel,Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John O. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and Member of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl !Lillie, City Engineer
DATE: July 1D, 1978
SU8JECT: OLYMPIC HILLS THIRD ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The Developer, Olympic Hills Corporation, is requesting City
Council approval of this Final plat of Olympic Hills Third Addition.
This is a 13 lot single gamily residential plat (R1-13.5), located
west of Franlo Road and East of the Olympic Hills golf course in •
Section 25.
Outlots A and B will be owned by the Olympic Hills Corporation and are
intended for use as access to the golf course area. Outlot C will be
owned by the Olympic Hills Corporation intended for future access for the
adjacent parcel.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved on December 7, 1977, per Resolu-
tion No. 77-136.
Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on
January 3, 1978, per Drdinance No. 77-39.
The final plat now submitted for approval conforms with the approved
preliminary plat.
VARIANCES: A variance from Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1 waiving the
six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the prelimi-
nary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. The developer
has proceeded with the project in a reasonable and efficient manner.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer,
concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, walkways, street
signs and street lighting will be installed throughout the development
in accordance with City standards and the Rezoning Agreement dated
December 30, 1977.
PARK DEDICATION: A cash contribution, in conformance with the requirements
of Ordinance No. 332, will be required upon issuance of building permits.
BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit, approved by the City Attorney,
shall be posted, in an amount approved by the City Engineer, to cover the
cost of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter,
bituminous surfacing, walkways and street signs.
- 2
A cash deposit of $304.20 will be required to coverthe first year main-
tenance and installation costs of street lighting.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Olympic Hills Third
Addition, subject to the requirements of this report and the following:
1. Execution of the Engineering Agreement.
2. Receipt'of fee for City Engineering services in the amount of
$390.00
3. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting in the amount
of $304.20.
4. Receipt of revised grading and development plan.
CJJ:kh
•
•
'9
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HE!i'iLPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA •
•
RESOLUTION NO. 78-127
A RESOLUTION AP"r'ROVING FINAL PLAT OF •
• OLYMPIC HILLS FOURTH ADDITION
WA REAS, the plat of Olympic Hills Fourth Addition has b_.n su'xnitted
in the i..anner required for platting land under the Eden Friarie Ordirance
Code and under Chapter 452sof the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have
been duly had thereunder, and
WHLREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and
the regulations and require:hants of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin-
ances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Olympic Hills Fourth Addition is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's •
Report on this plat dated July 11, 1978.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8,
Suhd. 1 waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the. preliminary plat and filing of the final plat
as described in said Engineer's Report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy •
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above cap:,ed
plat.
E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com-
pliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
Wolf tang H. Fenzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk ?
S'
CITY OF VAN PRAIRIE
EN INFF.RiNG REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: t,ayor Fenzel andPember of the City Council
THRO;ASH: Roar Ulstad, City !;:racer
FROM: Carl Jull.ie, City Engineer
DATE: July 11, 197E i
S"BJECT: OLYFIP1C_HILLS FOURTH ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The Developer, Olympic Hills Corporation, is requesting City Council
•
approval of the final plat of Oly.lpic Hills Fourth edition. Tis is a
26 lot single family residential plat (RI-13.5) 10catod north of Pic:-.cer
Trail cnd south of the Olympic Hills Oolf Course in Section 25.
Outlot A will he owned by the Olympic Hills Corporation and is intended
for use as access to the golf course. {
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Councii on Decc;her 7, i
1977, per Resolution No. 77-137.
Zoning ., RI-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on
January 3, 1978, per Ordinance No. 77-40.
The final plat now sutaitted for a-dpiuval conioras with the .,w;;,ved
preliminary plat.
VARIANCES: A variance from Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1, waiving the
six month maximum time elapse be'woen the proval date of the ;,relis.i-
nary plat and filing of the final plat will he r;ncc.sary. roc rirveler
has proceeded with the project in a r asoreble and e f'ic .=ut : c:.ner.
UTILITIES AND STRELTS: Municipal sanitary sewer, waterwain, storm s 4er,
concrete curb and gutter, hitur;inous surfacing, walkways, street signs
and street lighting will he installed throughout the de•:ele,rent in
accordance with City sandr:rds land the . ;,..,:e;ng torn ant da;..ed fcc....-
ber 30, 1917.
Building permits for Lots 20 and 21, Bloch 1 and tots 2, 3, 4 and 5,
Block 2, will not he allowed until the pending area flood elevation has
been determined and provisions, approved by the City Engineer, have
been made for an overflow control structure.
PARK DEDICATION: A cash contribution in conformance with the rc•quir;u nts
of Ordinance No. 332, will he required upon issuance of building 1.cn.:it5.
1.
i
17r-
- 2 -
60.4OI!G: A performance bond or letter of credit, approved by the City
attorney, shall be posted, in an amount approved by the City Engineer,
to cover the cost of sanitary sewer, we ter+::ain, storm s=scr, con.:rete
curb and •cutter, bituminous surfacing, walh.t.eys and street signs.
•
A cash d,;,^sit of S405.60 will be required to cover the first ; ar �.
paint-_ ,:o and installation costs of street lighting.
•
RECO'.`.Ch ATION: Reco!v.end approval of the final plat of Olympic Hills
Fourth Addition, subject to the requirec:ents of this re?ort and the
folk-wing:
1. Execution of the "Engineering Agree:ent."
2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the
a:nmunt of $730. •
3. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting in the
acount of $405.60.
4. Receipt of revised grading and develop;vent plan. '
CJJ:kh
•
I7 3
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNIY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION N0.78-128
- A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
HILLSBORO'UGH
WHEREAS, the plat of Hillsborough has been sg5mitted in a ::.nar
required for platting•land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 452 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings Lave been duly
had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City
plan and the reaula;i ons and requirements of the laws of the State of Minne-
sota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
•
A. Plat approval request for Hillsborough is approved upon, com-
pliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report
on this plat dated July 13, 1978.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy
of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds
and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by NSA
462.358, Subd. 3.
C. That the City Clerk is horcby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat. •
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute •
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on •
•
Wolfgang H. Fennel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL •
0ohn D. F cane, Clerk
1931 •
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ���''
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager •
•
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
•
DATE: July 13, 1978 •
SUBJECT: HILLSBOROUGH
PROPOSAL: The Preserve is requesting City Council approval of the final plat
of Hillsborough. This is a 33 lot single family residential plat (R1-13.5)
located south of Mill Creek Additions and east of Homeward Hills Road.
HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved on May 16, 1978, per. Council
Resolution No. 78-53.
Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on
June 20, 1978, per Ordinance No. 78-15.
The final plat now submitted for approval conforms with the appro'"'1
preliminary plat.
VARIANCES: No setback variances shall be allowed for this plat. Setbacks shall confor+
to the requirements of the Development Agreement dated June 20, 1978.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer,
concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, walkways, street signs
and street lighting will be installed throughout the development in
accordance with City standards.
A 9' radius shall be platted on the property lines at the intersection
of the westerly Runnel Circle cul-de-sac and the main Runnel Circle
and at the easterly Runnel Circle cul-de-sac return.
PARK DEDICATION: Outlot A will be dedicated to the City as part of the
Preserve PUO open space requirement. The developer shall submit a
protective covenant, to be approved by the City staff, covering the
scenic easement. This requirement must be fulfilled prior to the
release of the final plat.
A cash contribution, in conformance with the requirements of Ordinance
No. 332, shall be required upon issuance of building permits.
_ 2 -
BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit, approved by the City
Attorney, shall be posted in an amount approved by the City Engineer
sanitaryto cover the cost of a
m
curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, walkwaysr
and streetrsignsCrete
A cash deposit of $608.40 will be required, upon
release of the final
plat, to cover the installation and first year maintenance costs of
street lighting.
RECOMMENDATION: commeapproval
of the
herffirst
t platfoflof Hillsborough, sub-
ject to the requirements
1. Execution of the Engineering Agreement.
2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the
amount of $99D.
3. Receipt of cash deposit far street lighting in the
amount of $608.40.
4. Receipt of revised development and grading plan.
CJJ:kh
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE •
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 78-129
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
HILLSBOROUGH SECOND ADDITION
•
WHEREAS, the plat of Hillsborough Second Addition has bran sub-
mitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordin'-,ce
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings h>ve
been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and •
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COJNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE: •
A. Plat approval request for Hillsborough Second Addition is
approved upon compliance with the recoe aendation Of the City
Engineer's Report on this plat dated July 13, 1978.B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
•
copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Dceds
and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA
462.358, Subd. 3.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City h'anacer are hereby authorised to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Co.,ncil u,.00n
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
•
ADOPTED by the City Council on
Wolfgang H. Fenzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL •
•
John D. Frane, Clerk
1/i4
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
•
DATE: July 13, 1978
SUBJECT: HILLSBOROUGH SECOND ADDITION
PROPDSAL: The Preserve is requesting City Council approval of the final
plat of Hillsborough Second Addition. This is a 112 lot single family
residential plat (R1-13.5) located south of Pioneer Trail and west of
Homeward Hills Road.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved on May 16, 1978, per Council
Resolution No. 78-53.
Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on
June 20, 1978, per Ordinance No. 78-15.
The final plat now submitted for approval conforms with the approved
prelimwary plat.
VARIANCES: Variance from the minimum lot size requirement of Ordinance
No. 135 was allowed per the Development Agreement dated June 10, 1978.
Setback requirements and variances allowed through the above Agreement
as follows:
5' garage to side lot line
10' 1-1; story house to side lot line
15' 2 story house to side lot line
30' front of building to front lot line
except 25' on cul-de-sacs
20' rear of house to rear lot line
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer,
concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, walkways, street signs
and street lighting will be installed throughout the development in
accordance with City standards.
A 9' radius must be platted on the property lines at all intersections
and cul-de-sac returns.
PARK DEDICATION: Outlot A will be dedicated to the City as part of the PUD
density trade-off, as required through the Development Agreement. All
assessments and taxes will be paid by the owner.
A cash contribution, inconformance with the requirements of Ordinance
No. 332, shall be required upon issusnce of building permits.
- 2 -
BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit, approved by the City Attor-
ney, shall be posted in an amount approved by the City Engineer, to
cover the cost of sanitary sewer, watennain, storm sewer, concrete
curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, walkways and street signs.
A cash deposit of $1723.80 will be required, upon release of the final
plat, to cover the installation and first year maintenance costs of
street lighting.
•
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Hillsborough Second
Addition. subject to the requirements of this report and the following:
1. Execution of the Engineering Agreement.
2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the amount
of $2240.
3. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting in the amount of
$1723.80.
4. Receipt of revised development and grading plan. •
CJJ:kh
July 18.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNFY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 78-130 ;,
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
GARRISON FOREST THIRD ADDITION
WHEREAS, tRe plat of Garrison Forest Third Addition has boon sub-
mitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Orvinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all hroc dins have
been duly had thereunder, and
•
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Garrison Forest Third Addition is
approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City _
Engineer's Report on this plat dated July 13, 1978.
• B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified
copy of this Resolution in the office of the register of
Deeds and/or Registrar o; Titles for their use as required by
MSA 462.356, Subd. 3.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Ccuncil upon
:oiepliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on •
Wolfcang r. Pen.el, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
1237
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Manager
DATE: July 13, 1978
SUBJECT: GARRISON FOREST THIRD ADDITION
PROPOSAL: Bather, Ringrose, Woldfeld, Jarvis, Gardner, Inc., is requesting
final plat approval of Garrison Forest Third Addition. This is a
replat of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 2, Garrison Forest Second Addition.
An error in platting the utility and drainage easement, located in the
northerly portion of Lot 1, has necessitated this replatting.
HISTORY: The Preliminary plat was approved on May 2, 1978, per Council
Resoluiton No. 78-86.
The affected drainage and utility easements in Garrison Forest Second
Addition were vacated on May 2, 1978, per Council Resolution No. 78-87.
Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved on February 7, 1978,
per Ordinance No. 77-33.
The final plat now submitted conforms with the approved preliminary plat.
VARIANCES: Variances from the sideyard setback requirements of Ordinance
No. 135 should be allowed as follows:
5' garage to side lot line
10' 1-11 story house to side lot line
15' 2 story house to side lot line
30' from front of building to front lot line
20' from rear of house to rear lot line
These variances are the same as those approved for Garrison Forest
Second Addition.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Utilities and streets have been installed throughout
the development in accordance with City standards in conjunction with
Garrison Forest Second Addition.
PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication requirements have been satisfied through
the approval of Garrison Forest Second Addition.
I?3�
- 2 -
BONDING: All utilities and streets have been installed or are covered by
an existing bond for Garrison Forest Second Addition, therefore ad-
ditional
bonding will not be necessary.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Garrison Forest
Third Addition, subject to the requirements of this report and the
following:
1. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the
amount of $90.
CJJ:kh
July 1B, 197B
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
06-06-7B 10400 VOID OUT CHECK ( 2.00)
D6-16-7B 10420 VOID OUT CHECK • (10.00) •
06-29-7B 107B6 SAINTS VALLEY VIEW ROLLER
RINK Tickets for skating trip-Community
Services 144.00
107B7 MINNESOTA ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS Trip to zoo-Community Services 30.00
107BB MINNESOTA ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS Bus parking fee-Community Services 5.00
107B9 ED PHILLIPS & SONS Liquor 151.73
06-30-7B 1079D MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER Notary fee-Jean Johnson 10.00
10791 OLD PEORIA CO., INC. Liquor 517.64
10792 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. Liquor 51B.50
10793 JOHNSON BROTHERS Liquor 1,232.06
10794 HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE
DIST. Parking fee for buses-Community Services 16.00
10795 BLOOMINGTON ICE GARDENS Tickets-Community Services 27.00
10796 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Teen center flyer mailing 21.51
10797 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Utility bills 7B.50
1079B VOID CHECK
07-07-7B 10799 SAINTS VALLEY VIEW ROLLER
RINK Teen work program trip-Community
Services 19.80
1OBO0 MINNESOTA KICKS Ticket-Community Services 92.00
10B01 HIDDEN VALLEY RANCH Horseback riding fee for two leaders
-Community Services B.00
10B02 MILACS COUNTY Bail money 75.D0
10803 PLEASANT REFRIGERATION Repair dehumidifier-Public Safety 3B.90
10B04 INSTY PRINTS Service-Historical/Cultrual commission 9.65
10805 PETTY CASH Reimburse fund 46.21
07-10-7B 1OB06 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employees withheld and employer
ASSPI. contribution 7-7 payroll 6,2B4.75
10B07 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 7-7 payroll 27.12
1080B FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 8,591.61
10B09 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage for meter 1,000.00
10810 DASCO Batteries for Public Safety 46.OB
10B11 INSTY PRINTS Posters and flyers-Community Services 22.45
07-11-78 10812 FRANK'S NURSERY Landscaping for sewer manhold structure B3.72
D7-14-78 10B13 ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN
MUNICIPALITIES Dues 936.00
10B14 ALLIEO PROTECTIVE COATINGS Repair water tank-Paid by insurance 7,2B4.00
10B15 EARL APIDERSEN Traffic signs 4B3.40
10B16 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT Equipment parts 97.74
10817 ADVANCE AMBULANCE Supplies-Fire dept. 5B.32
1081B BRYAN ROCK Rack-Drainage control and Park development
grant program 1,200.14
1OB19 LES AND FRANCES BLACKLOCK Contract for deed payment 16,380.00
10820 BATTERY TIRE WAREHOUSE Filters 45.36
10821 BRY-AIR, INC. Motor-Water dept. 11B.B2
10B22 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH Keys-Public Safety 27.20
10823 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT CO. Supplies-Park Planning dept. 16.B7
July 18, 1978
07-14-78 10824 BRAUN ENGINEERING Services-Eden View I and Norseman Pk
2nd Add 1,844.75
10825 CITY DF EDINA Rental of gun range-Public Safety 108.00
10826 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC
INC. Supplies-Water Dept. 92.09
10827 CUTLER-MAGNER CO. Quicklime-Water dept. 4,970.93
10828 QUALITY WINE CO. Wine 688.94
10829 ED PHILLIPS AND SONS Liquor 1,532.86
10830 JOHNSON BROTHERS Liquor 1,272.48
10831 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 191.54
10832 INSTY PRINTS Service-Public Safety 7.80
10833 VOID CHECK
10834 COPY EQUIPMENT Supplies-Community Development project
$91, Park Planning $5 and Engineering
$76 171.80
1D835 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS Equipment parts 321.92
10836 KATIE DONOVAN Refund on swimming lessons 6.00
10837 DALE OFFICE MACHINES Repair cash registers-Beach concessions 277.90
10838 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS Legals 547.49
10839 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL Gasoline$1,551, Micro filming service
$806 2,357.15
10840 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS Concrete catch basin-Drainage control 140.26
10841 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY Gloves-Fire dept. 81.04
10842 FISCHER SAND Sand for beaches 535.42
10843 F.Y.S. FRAMING, INC. Award frame-Public Safety 8.77
10B44 FLDYD SECURITY Keys and locks-Liquor Store 41.50
10845 FEED-RITE CONTROLS Sulfate-Water dept. 1,089.00
10846 FRONTIER LUMBER Materials 84.10
10B47 MILDRED GRILL Contract for deed payment 47,200.00
1084B GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE CO. Pop for beach concessions 242.00
10849 DALE GREEN CO. Sod-Park tiaint. and Street Maint. 664.50
10850 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. Service-Parks and City Hall 101.90
10851 HDPKINS DODGE SALES, INC. Equipment parts 56.95
10852 HENNEPIN COUNTY Prisoners board-Public Safety 216.OD
10853 MASATO IKEGAMI Gym equipment rental-Community Service
dept. 100.00
10854 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF
BUILDING OFFICIALS Dues for Walter Johnson 75.00
10855 ITASCA EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment parts 24.34
10856 ELIZABETH JOHNSON June services 201.99
10857 BRAD JOHNSON Refund on swimming lessons 6.8D
10858 JAMES JENSEN Mileage-Planning dept. 76.36
10859 KC AUTO BODY Repairs to squad car 288.45
10860 KOKESH Engraving on plaque 5.80
10861 EDWARD KRAEMER Crushed rock-Park development grant
program 583.80
10862 KRAEMER'S HARDWARE Supplies 415.89
10863 KARULF HARDWARE Supplies-Fire dept. 14.58
10864 M. E. LANE, INC. Insurance 8,419.08
10865 PATRICK C. LUCY CO. Drive air impact wrench-City garage 251.29
10866 LOWELL'S C.T.C. AUTO PARTS Equipment parts 99.80
10867 W. R. MCNAUGHTAN June services-Building dept. 256.00
10868 MEDCENTER HEALTH PLAN Insurance 958.73
10869 ROBERT MARTZ July expenses 103.75 1
1087D METROPOLITAN WAS1E CONTROL
COMMISSION August sewer service charges 13,456.19
July 18, 1978
07-14-78 10871 MODERN TIRE CO. Tires and tire repairs 185.08
10872 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. Asphalt-Street maint. 288.10
10873 METRO PRINTING, INC. Service-Public Safety dept. 45.00
10874 MINNESOTA FIRE, INC. Supplies-Fire dept. 289.80
10875 MEDICAL OXYGEN Oxygen-Fire dept. 276.32
10876 BEN MEADOWS CO. Paint-Tree Disease dept. 114.46
10877 MINNEGASCO Service 72.92
10878 NORTHERN AUTOMOTIVE CO. Truck repairs-Fire dept. 205.27
10879 NORTHWESTERN NAtIONAL BANK Bond cremation P78.81
10880 NORTHERN STATES POWER Service 1,054.12
10881 NEWLANO FEED CO. 300 bales of hay-Community Development
project 130.00
10882 NORTHWESTERN BELL Service 1,949.31
10883 OLSEN CHAIN AND CABLE Chain-Community Development
project 60.22
10884 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Insurance 3,800.34
10885 KERRI PORTEL Refund on horseback riding lessons 46.00
10886 LISA PRATT Refund on swimming lessons 10.00
10887 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN Supplies-Park ttaint. • 3.96
10888 PEPSI-COLA Pop for machines 231.10
10889 PUT-ON SHOPPES, INC. Shirts for Tree Disease inspectors 93.00
10890 PHOTO MILL Film-Assessing dept. 165.00
10891 ROAD MACHINERY Equipment rental-Park development grant
project 191.60
10892 ROOT-O-MATIC Services-Sewer dept. 38.50
10893 KAREN RANNOW Refund on swimming lessons 8.50
10894 MARGARET REKOSKE Refund on golf lessons 18.00
10895 ROBERT DRUG Supplies-Community Services dept. 25.44
10896 DONALD ROGERS Seal abandon well at Fire Station 87.00
10897 R. C. PRINTING CO. Liquor servers I.D. cards 17.00
10898 STEICHEN'S Ballfield liner-Park Maint. 59.95
10899 SOUTH-TOWN REFRIGERATION Repair to ice machine-Liquor Store 50.90
10900 SULLIVAN SEPTIC SERVICE Pump lift station 40.00
10901 OON STREICHER GUNS, INC. Gun holster-Public Safety 19.95
10902 W. GORDON SMITH CO. Gasoline and parts for equip.$95
Diesel oil - Community Oevelopment
project$818 913.57
10903 STEWART SANDWICHES Sandwiches-Beach concessions 108.92
10904 SPORTS WORLD Volleyball nets-Community Services 35.90
10905 SEARS ROEBUCK CO. Shocks -dehumidifier- City garage and
Public Safety 42.97
10906 BEVERLY TELFORD Refund on tennis lessons 7.20
10907 VOID CHECK •
10908 TEAM ELECTRONICS Supplies-City Hall Addition 534.90
10909 TOWN'S EDGE FORD Equipment repairs 216.65
10910 VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment parts 17.07 1'.
10911 GREGG & BRAD WALKER Refund on swimming lessons 17.00 !
10912 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE Insurance 324.25 1.
10913 WORD PROCESSING CENTER Equipment repair 25.00
10914 LIGHTING CONCEPTS Light bulbs-Water dept. 83.76
10915 WALDOR PUMP Pump repair-Sewer dept. 663.16
10916 WHEELER HARDWARE CO. Materials-City Hall addition 188.90
10917 WILCOX PAPER CO. Office supplies 224.91
10918 W. A. WEISMAN CO. Food-Beach concessions 327.80
1
• July 18, 1978
07-14-78 10919 ZECO CO. Equipment parts 32.74
10920 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC. Service 16,864.06
10921 SANDY WERTS June expenses 26.85
10922 HENNEPIN COUNTY Deposit on camp site-Community Services 5.00
10923 DALE REDPATH Poster for Community band 15.00
10924 NANCY RANNOW Refund on swimming lessons 10.00
10925 STATE OF MINNESOTA Service-TH169 9,331.11
10926 BRAUER & ASSOC.. Service Scenic Heights upgrading 4,196.28
10927 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO. Bid ad 106.80
10928 P.C.I. Contract-TH169 Est. No. 9 54,827.07
10929 MCNAMARA-VIVANT CONT. CO. Scenic Heights upgrading Est. No.
4 60,018.52
10930 QRS CONSTRUCTION Stewart Highlands Est. no. 8 1,754.73
10931 JOHNSON BROTHERS CORP. Eden View I Est. No. 3 88,336.98
10932 G. L. CONTRACTING, INC. Well pumphouse #3, Est. No. 1 69,188.16
10933 BROWN & CRIS CONSTRUCTION Homeward Hills Rd. Imp. Est. No. 2 25,687.98
10934 W. R. MCNAUGHTAN July Services-Building dept. 192.00
10935 MICHAEL RICHARDSON Softball supervisor services 270.OD
TOTAL ' 480,374.91
OE
}
GELGO GO)POHATION -
ONE GELCO DRIVE• EDEN PRAIRIE.MINNESOTA 55343
612.944.4666 'i
EMERSONP-GREENDCRG •
J:t c G p
`Nea.sta.,an0 ratAilie9
July 11, 1978
Mr. Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
City of Eden Prairie - !
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Mr. Ulstad: •
1
This will confirm our telephone conversation of this
morning.
Gelco requests the necessary Public Hearings at the
earliest possible date for approval of our rezoning ,
request.
Please call me if there is any additional information
the City requires.
Thank you for your help.
Yours v y truly,
,
EPC:am Emerso P. Greenberg 4
•
P
3
0- R.O. KNUTSON
ATTORNEY AT LAW j.
180 SHELARD TOWER AREA CODE 612
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55126 5164646
July II, 1978
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
ti
Attention: City Manager
Re: CPT Corporation - Rezoning Request
Gentlemen:
Concerning the 30-acre site that we are applying to have rezoned from Rural
to Industrial at the intersection of Mitchell Road and Scenic Heights Road,
on behalf of CPT Corporation I hereby request that this matter be set on the
City Council Agenda for a hearing at the earliest possible City Council meeting,
and that the necessary arrangements be made to publish the hearing in the
local paper as required by law and your ordinances. If you need any information
from me or any help in processing this matter, please contact me at your conven-
ience.
51 I ours,
. Hutson
kJ
The reserve i WIS
A.
July 11, 1978 •
•
Mr. Roger Ulstad, City Manager
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Roger:
The Anderson Lakes Apartment project has been approved by the
Planning Commission. Please request the Council to set
August 1!, 1978 as the public hearing on this project and
arrange for the necessary public notices.
Regards.
THE PRESERVE
44:2
/o ff `"i��`�-� .
ee W. Joh.
Vice President, Engineering
LWJ/jl
cc: Doug Moe
William G. Bale •
•
iliWo
. . r.,__n__:_:,. •e:...........,KK?AQ • MR171 0ai.21N)1
M
dQvQ o oment
corporation
Jul 14191b
•
4. Nk
July 14, 1978
Roger Ulstac, City U na er
City of F.en Prairie
8950 E,en Prairie Roac
3cen Prairie, ;•in. 55344
Dear Ito:en
Thia letter is meant to inform you that 'c are still continuing
to explore the possibility of revisinC our site plan in Prairie
East 7th Aeeition .anc: ,re have not receive' our complete set
of oil tests. Therefore, we are requestin,; that you continue
tip' ; item on the July 18 council a?enc'a to the Au vat 1 'meeting.
S' ccrely '/
niA 40,-,
J'n Ostenson
J ier
i
` Mg 1
12750 PIONEER TRAIL EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343(612)941-4383
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 78-36
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION OF
EDEN PRAIRIE
Section 1. Subdivision 1. There is hereby created the Flying Cloud Airport
Advisory Commission for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota consisting of seven members
to be appointed as follows: Three members to be appointed for a term of three
years; two members for a term of two years and two members for a term of one year,
to consist of at least one member to represent the Metropolitan Airports Commission
to be appointed by the Chairman of the Metropolitan Airports Commission, no less than
two members representing the Flying Cloud Airport Businessmen's Association to be
appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council, and four members to be
appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council. Subsequent appointments
shall be made for three year terms or until successors are appointed and-qualified.
Subdivision 2. The purpose of this Commission is to improve the communications
between the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the City and to discuss Flying
Cloud operations as it affects the City.
Subdivision 3. Members of the Commission shall serve withoutcompensation and
t,ftheir respective terms of office shall expire at the end of a ti -for/which they
are appointed.
Subdivision 4. Immediately following appointment of, and acceptance of such
appointment by all members of the original Commission, it shall meet and organize
by electing such officers as may be necessary, and adopt such rules, by-laws and
regulations for the conduct of its work as it deems necessary and advisable. The
Commission shall meet at least once a quarter. Four members present at a regular or 1
special meeting of the commission shall constitute a quorum. i'
1
Section 2. The Commission shall advise the City Council and the Metropolitan
Airports Commission with regard to all matters affecting the flying Cloud Airport,
the classification, rules and regulations supplied to the operation of that airport
and the development of lands adjacent to said airport.
Section 3. The commission shall cooperate with the Metropolitan Airports
Commission staff in reviewing for• the benefit of the City Council matters affecting
the use and control of Flying Cloud Airport and shall make its recommendations to
the City Council and.the Metropolitan Airports Commission upon request with regard
to any proposal affecting the use or operation of Flying Cloud Airport.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie
this 5th day of July, 1978, and finally read, adopted and ordered published at
a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of
1978.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Published in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1978.
i i•'"d�
MEMO:
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jean Johnson, Planning Assistant
DATE: July 17, 1978
•
SUBJECT: CITIZENS INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THE FLYING CLOUD
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION
•
The Planning Department attempted to contact the following persons who
previously served on the commission and inquired if they were interested
in appointment to the Airport Commission:Kent Barker, Lois Westlund,
Tim Pierce, Diane Luke, Gloria Westlund, Don Peterson, Jim Ostenson ,
Rod Sundstrom, Norma Schee, Nancy Laidlaw, Sally Brown,and Tom Jensen.
The following individuals expressed interest in appointment to the ,
commission:
Kent Barker y
Tim Pierce ;JO ^ 1)
Norma Schee . r a �
Nancy Laidlaw(if needed)
Sally Brown . 1 .
Tom Jensen - ;I
Jim Ostenson
We were unable to contact the following individuals:
Lois Westlund (out of town)
Gloria Westlund 1
Don Peterson !'
The following individual did not call back with a response after being
contacted: Diane Luke
JMJ:jj
I
•
St
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sandy Werts, Recreation Supervisor
THROUGH: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
SUBJECT: Gelco Corporation PUD, Stages II - V
DATE: July 18, 1978
The Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission discussed the Gelco
Corporation PUD, Stages II - V at their meeting on Monday, July 17, 1978.
Their motion is as follows:
"Kruell moved the recommendations as submitted by Staff
(Planning Staff Report of July 7, 1978) be approved with
the exception that the Stage II building be limited to
three stories and Stages III - V building be limited to
five stories." Motion carried 4 - 1, with Dave Anderson
voting "nay" because he was not opposed to Stages III
through V being seven stories.
A second motion also was passed by the Commission as follows:
"Dave Anderson moved to direct Staff to contact the
appropriate bodies to find out why the Anderson
Lakes water level is dropping in spite of the recent
heavy rains. Motion carried unanimously."
Third motion as adopted:
" Tangen moved to forward the EAW on Gelco to the
Council, Kruell seconded." Motion carried 4 - 1.
SW:jp
9
JJ •
7-13-71
RESOLUTION 78-119 •
•
A RESOLUTION FINDING THF.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WORKSHEET FOR GELCO CORPORATION A PRIVATE ACTION
DOESZREQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie did
consider the Gelco Corporation Environmental Assessment Worksheet
at the July 18, 1978 regular scheduled Council Meeting, and
WHEREAS, said rezoning is approximately 18 acres of land
from I-5 Park to Office District , and said Planned Unit Develop- _
ment comprises approximately 45 acres located South of Hest 78th
Street, North of Anderson Lakes, and West of existing Gelco
Corporate Office, and
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission did hold a 3i
public meeting on July 10 and June 26, 1978 to consider the zoning
and Planned Unit Development request of Gelco Corporation and
recommended said request be approved by the City Council, and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City
Council that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary
y,
for Gelco Corporation Planned Unit Development and rezoning because
the project is not a major action which does not have significant
environmental effects and is not more than of local significance.
BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Negative Declaration Notice
shall be officially filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality
Council.
, 1978.
day of
ADOPTED this __-- _-- -----
ATTEST:
• Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
•
John-D. Franc, City Clerk SEAL
1•r _ )
6-13-78 .q,
•a••• •:, •oaol'•• R et,i'•se'd''T-/T2/78
1) P\F T' -r
NINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCZL �".'4
ENVIROti ENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSIIEET (EAW) t`.i J)3*5R� .,' .
AND NICE OF FINDINGS
—.ter- __.._•^_._-_-• : ..,. .. : . ... i
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE •
�.._— E.R. # r
NOTE, The purpose of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is to provide
inforrotion on a project so that one can assess rapidly whether or not the
project requires an Environmental Impact Statement. Attach additional
*pages, charts, maps, etc, as needed to answer these questions. Your
answers should be as specific as possible. Indicate which answers are
.estimated- £I
I. SUMMARY
A. ACTIVITY FINDING BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY (PERSON) t
REIINegative Declaration (No EIS) EIS Preparation Notice (EIS Required)
13'
C. c,
B. ACTIVITY IDENTIFICATIa� Gelco Office Building Stage••i1- , ''; .
1. 'Project name or title
2. Project proposers) Gelco Corporation ti ;j
Address One !'oleo Drive , Eden Prairie, Mg. 55344
612 944-466ti ,•... ..
'lephone Nu,dher and Area Code ( ) •
3... Responsible Agency or Person City of Eden Prairie'
•
Address 8950 Eden Prairie-Road; Eden'Prairle,' Mn: 55344 -
Person in Responsible Agency (Person) to contact for further information •
l
on this EAW: Chris Enger - Telephone 612-941-2262
A. This FAW and other supporting documentation arc available for public in-
spection and/or copying at: Location
City of Eden Prairie i
•
" Telephone 941-2262 ' Hours 8:00am-4220pm
5. Reason for EAW Preparation
T.
Ma,:datozy Category 'cite 0Pet:ttion t_._J Other
'MEQC Rule number(s)t1EQC 24(b)(1)(bb)(dd) •• •,•_ _••
j,
C. ACTIVITY UE:SCRIPTION SUMMARY .: .:'.:,:).h ........ :r. ' t_ ti • r
1. Project location •
A
County Hennepin city/Township name Eden Prairie
Township number 116 (North), Range Number 7? East or (circle one),
Section number(s) 13 Street address (if in city) or legal description:
• 1 ,j-'
2. Type and scope of proposed project: Estimate future - 590,000 sq. ft.
110,000 sq.ft. existing office, 120,000 sq.ft. each for the future 4 stages
3. Estimated starting date (month/year) Stage II August. 19Z8
4. Estimated completion date (month/year) Stages III.IV A 1L unknown at this time
5. Estimated construction cost $5,000,000 for Stacie II
6. List any federal funding involved and known permits or approvals needed
from each unit of government and status of each:
Unit of Government,, NameeorrT Type
l euof PPermit/Approval Status
(federal, state,
regional, local)
•Nine Mile Watershed grading & land alternation permit pending .
City of Eden Prairiezoning approval & building permit pending
•
EQB negative declaration pending
7. If federal pennies, funding or approvals are involved, will a federal EIS
be prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act7.-X-
NO YES UNKNOWN
II. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
A. Include the following maps or drawings:
1. A map s'•^'•'ing th.: regional locatica of tha project. Attached.
i. An original els x 11 section of a U.S.G.S. 71 minute, 1:24,000 scale map
with the activity ur project area boundaries and site layout delineated_
Indicate quadrangle sheet name. (Original U.S.G.S. sheet must be main-
tained by Responsible Agency; legible copies may be supplied to other
EAR distribution points.) Attached.
3. A sketch map of the site showing location of structures and including
significant natural features (water bodies, roads, etc). Attached.
4. Current photos of the site must be maintained by the Responsible Agency.
Photos need not be sent to other distribution points.
B. Present land use. •
1. Briefly describe the present use of the site and lands adjacent to the site.
Site contains 2 existing houses and parking for 210 cars. Existing Gelco.0ffice
and parking to the east, and rural undeveloped land to the west. West 78th Street
and I-494 borders the site on the north, and Anderson Lakes on the south. ;•
2. Indicate the approximate acreages of the site that are: '
a. Urban developed 24.4 acres f. Wetlands (Type III, IV,.V) 0 acres
•
b. Urban vacant ()acres g. Shoreland
• acres
C. Rural developed 0•acres • h. Floodplain ' 0 acres ,
d. Rural vacant 16 2acres i. Croplane.✓Pasture land _,__acres
e. Designated Score- 0 acres j. Forested • 1"4 acres
ation/Open Space
- 2
-=-�- .w.MCM I •
i 44
• Cr
' Al.K«G.
wN,.. { « 1.1444.4 T� ma rug« I..ul '«•
NM
Ott wU
«i .. • ........t0rr• •w - •,� WAShWG1OM CO.
•
r ,.O0141.11 1• .rU i.e. - .r.r_.. iw.•I-7.1. 111 •�� 6.«I ! ••
4114
44
.. -^
I .rv,, i .a .i Ll`' • ..r.� «h,. 1..•e` _...r-_.f
\e. ..}I. A 1. - --__ s t 16
'•AWS!V CO. , a I.
N! �t] 1. i... - ./ e 6 __ y.r...r•.Lii..r aria-i�y.i ,`1• ,' ,
r ,_p. , .w.. � . I ..... .. .. .
L ' --- ........... .......
CAM..L. CO
a F. -1 • 1l, DAKOTA CO. r. `
•
.4114441.
Ltd t I .•_•....,. �l _ _ — ..,- -r 1
t-„-- t ram- ILerrefi
« a•„
SCOTT CO.
I ..K..•.•. r .hnt I
•
' «., 'wR '»n u n
. a .." 1 .. ..... ,. u•..
UV .,.
:KM.
.. L—J—_I
L
•
TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA
AtID6i-COun.y OounOOry
='.r.,.•••••.... •••• ..... auu_M,.,,CWnl OouOGOry
••••4 n '::::•::.�• 4••••..... t•=']t__Township OounOnry
ii::C i:: �..... . . al 11 444•4•re.. 1
1153
*The services indicated are:Public water systems 11973).Storm sewers 11973).
• Sanitary seweis 11973),Full time police service(1972),Fire insurance ratings of G or less #
110111 e.l..•.h.t.•,l I...<avvke I1974).39 min.travel times to Mpls.or St.Paul(1973).
[r Gn•N PI .0 Ifryant Lake as, ,•� P,1. ;I' \' }'��� �'((S_.
- \
e• it°' ''•.��; SrJ,;; \ I b 1. I �7 r 1 ' )/n • f
\ ,� a' ` , \'k, . {,• F -.lux(' \, /rL iI
ii � ( -BM B75' .Radom Towers'� � r � 1 i amen.;
y
t 10 d-_ I I e r ��- (KRS.)„ i 4• .--? �t
`�'� �J c n \'... J ,,-, l,, 1.yesc -,nf J' Gravel rit �� t;1
a C.Nt ~ c, q 1 \ \ .yi' ,South Forl Te��,
�„y £t{• ev :Rowland ? .•'i'�'_%2
�.�
15 13 i y
•
_ ( � ' \1 .\ (��.
(. C -- ) fit�
`
:C f �\ o - ,' P tQ�
T - , v• �• - _ f b
1• (122 ( ( `\,,\ •�� 1�p4_\�. . y p 11 •
r
nt1 t �
,9 ll3 - E" `.Lai I -° s
` Q* AM
` •W
` •\\ \' •14LdenP$ aCem b_ ( .:a 1•II
�•,' t
-'� �N 't ro t \ jI rt •��V . .r T
•
�_ ---- I (_ II ,>"•-�...en t. \, I - \
G �y 26I ,� II•A 2.� 23 I �,,,, • .°,"
ice' ' 11• =� \ �, t"
• L
I '\ :••e .t 1 �,_ yi
1-.
in1 c64 fly ,:4,, �t- ��, 3' \
411,
� � fA Ptil �
,{•T kM, tes.. CI
eliv
i fS, ,4,cb`' c A
I<i /,
.. yi • ?�x _. t ti 4);i.l � *<,
'S �� L.
J y
r ;1/44/ 0#1,„i,v-7 .41,., ,M
.."1
12'
J /i i"
II , ,,,/cv„";Niit't
1 ' it(;--=----,'•'?::4_ ./4'4=ii:-.1,11'....4 ' .
d �Y
i ' '.56 //i.e`q,-":,it ; , iLtiy/•-•,',Q'r,
W),<,1)c:› ";,!.;,,‘ N/!!Y ,'it.,'4.f...)4°
,. / YY r Q J/{
\.
:" \ �� W
\ 14 a
II.A.3. 1
,kl/•
,
I
•
•
3. List names and sizes of lakes, rivers and streams on or near the site,
particularly lakes within 1,000 feet and rivers and streams within
300 feet.
Anderson Lakes, a regional wildlife area, is located 160+ feet from the
south property line. Nine Nile.Creek is,north of I-494 about 1500 'from
the site.
C. Activity Description
1. Describe the proposed activity, including staging of development (if any),
operational characteristics, and major types of equipment and/cr pro-
cesses to be used!.Include data that would indicate the magnitude of
the proposed activity (e.g. rate of production, number of customers, tons
of raw materials, etc).
All stages of the office building will provide space fora total approximate
2,400 people. Stage II construction is scheduled to begin in August,
1978 with completion by January, 1980 . Scheduling for stages III,
IV and V have not yet been determined. .
( for additional information see attached brochure)
•
2". Fill. Ia the following where applicable:
a. Total project area 42 acres g. Size of marina and access 0 sq. ft.
or • channel (water area)
Length N.A.miles h. Vehicular traffic trips �"
generated per day Stage II- 0 ADT
b. Number of housing or future total - 816�
recreational units 0 i. Number of employees 2500 total
c. Height of structuresg i tS2' j•
. Water supply needed Stg II 27,90(jal/da
Stages III - V 91' Source: future total 71,500
d. Number of parking 2984
spaces k. Solid waste requiring •
(ordinance requires ) disposal existing BStageII 3C0tors/)r
e. Amount of dredging 0 cu. yd. future total 930
1. Cammercial, retail or
f. Liquid wastes requir- industcia1 floor space _0._sq. ft.
ing treatment . gal/da
existing&stage II 25,000 gal/day
future total 64,000 gal/day
III. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL. ENVIRONMENTAL IMFACT
A. SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY.,
1. Will the project be built in an area with slopes currently
exceeding 12%: X No Yes
2. Are there other geologically unstable areas involved in the project,
such as fault zones, shrink-swell soils, peatlands, or sinkholes? X NO YES
3. If yes on 1 or 2, describe slope conditions or unstable area and any
measures to be used to reduce potential adverse impacts.
•
- 3 -
4. Indicate suitability off site oils these for foundations,
in the indiviprojecdual septic
systems, and ditching, i
Slopes are stable. Also See attached soil map and report.
Conventional spread footings reconnended for steel frame structures.
S.. Estimate the total amount of grading and filling which will be done:
•
1,390,000 cut balance 30% of site
What percent of the site will be so altered?
6. What will be the maximum finished slopes?
7. W'Fat steps will bvstaken to minimize soil erosion during and
after construction?
—Erosion control methods, i:e., dikes, will be followed as per Watershed
District recorimendatiens. After construction seeding and sodding, and other
erosion control methods will be used to stablize graded areas.
Sedimentation and skinning devices will be used to control sedimentation
and pollutants from entering Anderson Lakes.
B. VEGETATION
1. Approximately what percent of the site is in each of the following
vegetative types: •
• Woodland 10 % Cropland/ _ 0_% •
Pasture
Brush or shrubs 35 % Marsh 5 %
Grass or herbaceous 50 1 Other ` 0 Fs •
(Specify)
2. How many acres of forest or woodland will be cleared, if any? 0 acres
3. Are there any rare or endangered plant species or areas of
unique
botanical or biological significance on the site? (See DNS publication
The Uncrr on Ones.) X NO YES
T ye-, Tis[[ii, species or area and indicate any measures to be used
to reduce potential .adverse impact.
•
C. FISH AND WI!.ULl e.
1. Are there any designated federal, state or local wildlife or fish manage-
ment areas or sanctuaries near or adjacent to the site? _NO X YES
2. Are there any known rare or endangered species of fish and wildlife
YF�
on or near the site? (See r.NA publication The Uncommon X Y NO
Ones.)
3. Will the project alter or eliminate wildlife or. fish !NO X YES
habitat? .
4. If yes on any of question.; 1-3, list the area, species or habitat, and
indicate any measures te,be used to reduce potential adverse impact on
them.
See page 4 b •
/752 1
•
•
•
WILDLIFE
The project beimg located near Anderson Lakes Park
has an abundance of wildlife , because of the variety of natural
cover, the proximity to water and the large amounts of open space.
Some of the mammals and birds in the area will be eliminated or dis-
placed. The amount of habitat and food will be reduced, eliminating
the potential to produce wildlife proportionately. The territorial
concerns of other animals such as fox will be disrupted. Microclimate
and other changes will increase the population of certain undesirable
wildlife species including : housemice, norway rats, starlings and
. english sparrows.
Generally the wildlife population will be decreased because of the
decrease in habitats, food, territorial boundaries, the introduction
of noise, air pollution, man and his ...::vement, and the changes in
microclimate. The impact on the wildlife is proportional to the
amount of restriction imposed on access to the creek valley which is
the major wildlife habitat.
4b
D. HYDROLOGY
1. Will the project include any of the following:
If yes, describe type of work and mitigative measures
to reduce adverse impacts.
a. Drainage or alteration of any lake, pond, marsh, ED.
• lowland or groundwater supply X_
b. Shore protection works, dame, or dikes J1,_
• C. Dredging or filling operations .X.— —_
d. Channel modific.tions or diversions 1(.._
e. Appropriation of ground and/or surface water X _.
f. Other changes in the course, current or cross- �—
section of water bodies on or near the site
2. What percent of the area will be converted to new impervious surface?
mar-30 a for total
3. Ugameas 5bures Addenduwillm
m be taken to reduce the volume of surface water run-
off and/or treat it to reduce pollutants (sediment, oil, gas, etc.)?
Owner will be working directly with Watershed District in developing
methods of:sedimentation control, skimming tanks or ponds, filtration
plants and storm sewer if necessary, and will meet the requirements
and recommendations of the Nine Mile Watershed District.
4. Will there be encroachment* into the re;ional (100 year) floodplain
by new fill or structures? . X NO YES
If yes, does it conform to the local floodplain ordinance? NO X YES
5. What is the approximate minimum depth to groundwater on 3 feet
the site?
i . WATER QUALITY sanitary sewage
1. Will there be a discharge of process or cooling water,
groundwater? NO X YES
or other waste waters to any water body or to gr and the
if yes, specify the volume, the concentration of pollutants
Water body receiving the effluent.
•
ND YES g
X process water
X cooiing;water
_ X sanitary sewer(Metro wastewater treatment plat to Minn. River)
X storm sewer( rosion and sedimentation controls applied by Nine
Mile WatersPed District)
2. If discharge of waste water to the municipal treatmeltutan is
planned, identify any toxic, corrosive or unusual p y�.
in the wastewater. r
• None •
cct? NO YES
3. Will any sludges be generated by the proposed proj . _.�-
If yes, specify the expected volume, chemical composition and method
•
of disposal.
. J?59
ADDENDUM
Gelco is anticipating building the structures with a
layer of earth on• each roof which will be planted with
•
ground cover. Therefore, the building roofs have not been
counted as impervious surface. The design is currently under
review by Staff members of the DNR, and if it is determined that
the building tops should be considered as impervious service,
Gelco will plan additional parking ramp structures to decrease
the arount of hard surface on-grade parking keeping the total
impervious surface area to no more than 30%,
- Sb -
rite()
4. What measures will be used to minimize the volumes or impacts identified
in questions 1-3?
Sedimentation ponds will be used to control storm water runoff and
discharge of sediment into Anderson Lakes.
Oil skimmers will be used in the ponding areas draining the parking lot.
5. If the project is or includes a landfill, attach information on soil profile,
depth to water table, and proposed depth of disposal.
•� N.A.
F. AIR QUALITY AND NOISE
1. Will the activity cause the emission of any gases and/or particulates
into the atmosphere? NO X YES
If yes, specify the type and origin of these emissions, indicate any
emission control devices or measures to be used, and specify the approxi-
mate amounts for each emission (at the source) both with and without the
emission control measures or devices.
Engine emissions from construction equipment during construction.
Daily automobile and truck traffic. •
Emissions from heating and cooling of the buildings. •
•
2. Will noise or vibration be generated by construction and/or operation
of the project? NO X YES
If yes, describe the noise source(s); snecify decibel levels [dn(A)J, .ead
duration (hrs/da) for each and any mitigative measures to redsce the
noise/vibration. Noise during construction should be confined to daylight hours.
. Standards for noise Maximum dBA Ranges:
Day Night Equipment: At machine at 250 feet
L10 150 L10 L50 scraper gi-I
60dBA 65dBA 50dBA 55dBA oader 78-96 63-8
reas s
3. If yes on 1 or 2, specify whether any aensitive to noise. or
reduced air quality-(hospitals, elderly housing, wilderness, wildlife
areas, residential developments, etc.) are in the affected area and give
distance from source.
Anderson Lakes, a wildlife area, is located approximately 160+ feet from
the site. •
G. LAND RESOURCE CO:3S£RVATIGN, ENERGY
1. Is any of the site meltable for agricultural or forestry production
or currently in such use? X NO YES
If yes, specify the acreage involved, type and volume of marketable crop
or wood produced and the quality of the land for such use.
Topography would limit cultivation.
2. Are there any known mineral or peat deposits on the site? X NO YES
If yes, specify the type of deposit and the acreage.
t1'I
- 6 -
3. Will the project result in an increased energy demand?
NO X YES
Complete the following as applicable* '
a, Energy requirements (oil, electricity, gas, coal, solar, etc.) •
,
Estimated Peak Demand
Annual (Hourly or nails) Anticipated f.
Firmi Contract or
Basis?
e Hrcuiremen
Sumner Winter Sup lien
firm _ Stage II
Electricity 1,728,000 KW 960 KW 600K!•! N S P•
Gas 3227 mcf
1.2mcf/da 29.5mcf/de ()innegasco firm "
Alle.Stages 14,100,000KY. 3750 KW 3000 Kh NSP firm
,l• . " 15,490 mcf 5.70 mc - 141.6 ncf Minne ascc firm
•
•
b. Estimate the capacity of all proposed on—site fuel storage.
. N.A. .
•
c. Estimate annual energy distribution fors
space heating 20._..
lighting 50 t
i . 3 s
air conditioning 22
i processi.ng.�—
ventilation 5 _ '
d. Specify any major energy conservation systems and/or equipment
incorporated into this project. Electric heat pump system is being considered
as well as a variable air volume system. Heat from light fixtures will be reused
as well as building circulated air. Building will utilize passive energy design
techniques, including: reflected insulatinn glass, proper solar orientation and
overhangs, and partial underground design,( north side of building will be built
into hillside). .
e. What secondary energy use effects may result from this project
(e.g. more or loner car trips, induced housing or businesses, etc)'?
The project may increase the length of automobile trips for some time.
Local housing projects may be increased to accommodate increased local ..
employment. In'turn this may increase demand for service commercial.
R. OPEN SPACE/RECREATION
1.. Are there any designated federal, state, county or local recreation or
open space areas near the sit.: (including wild and scenic riv`eCs, trails,
lake accesses)? NO be affected by the
If yes, list areas by name and explain how each may
project. Indicate any measures to be used to reduce adverse impacts.
Anderson Lakes Regional Park is south of the property line. Proponent is
working with the City and Watershed District to achieve sensitive
treatment of the site. .
IT,:)-
N. TRANSPORTATION
1. Will the project affect any existing or proposed transportaation sjsstem
(highway, railroad, water, airport, etc)?
If yes, specify which part(s) of the system(s) will be affected. cos
these, specify existing use and capacities, average traffic speed and
l.erccntage of truck traffic (if highway); andcindaindicate
how
heyr will
lc e
affected by the project (e.g. congestion, pe 9a ef t
safety, increased traffic (ADT), access requirements).
Highway 169/212 ., Co.Rd. 18
55 mph 55 mph
12-13% truck traffic 6-8% truck traffic
15,000-16,000 ADT 4500-10,000' ADT
at capacity 9,000-10,000 capacity
s
* Also see attached sheet 8 b.
2. Is mass transit available to the site?
X NO YES
•
3. What measures, including transit and paratransit services, are planned to
reduce adverse impacts?
Several transit options exist for Eden Prairie as outlined in the
• "Transit Potentials Interim Report". Eden Prairie Center is expected to
• be center of activity in the area and seems to be the logical location
for several transit alternatives. These include Coordinated Transfer
• Service, Park-n-Ride, Service & car and van pooling. Others not ;
necessarily dependent on Eden Prairie Center as a central location are
Fixed Route Deviation and Demand Rc....onsive Service.
J. PLANNING, LAD USE, COtMtUNITY SERVICES comprehve
1. Is the project consistent with local and/or regional ehensi YES
plans? NO X
If not, explain:
•
Eden Prairie's 1968 Guide Plan depicted site as Industrial.
Eden Prairie's Draft 1978 Guide Plan depicts this site as Commercial.
Site is consistent with Draft Guide Plan.
If a zoning change or special use permit is necessary, indicate existing
zoning and change requested.
Site is presently zoned I-5 Park ( Industrial ) a
Proponent is requesting rezoning to Office District. .
•
. •
2. Will the type or height of the project conflict with the characterac of the
• existing neighborhood?
ES
' If yes, explain and describe any measures to be used to reduce conflicts. 11
! ; .3
•
•
•
TRANSPORTATION
•
169/212 Co. Rd. 1118
Completion of this project could Co. Rd. 18 could expect
add additional ADT to 169/ additional trips This
212 which is now running at or near road is now near capacity, but
capacity. the additional traffic could be
•handled. Traffic would enter
Co.Rd. 18 at West 78th Street.
The traffic would enter 169/212 at
theintersection of West 78th street
or Schooner Boulevard.
This project is also expected to The Cities of Eden Prairie &
increase traffic on I-494 , both Bloomington, and the Highway Departments
east and '••est bound. of Hennepin County and the State of
Minnesota are presently researching
upgrading of West 78th to permit
safer access.
•
•
8 b
3. How many employees will move into the area to be near the project? unknown •
How much new housing will be needed? unknown
4. Will the project induce development nearby--either support services '
' or similar developments? Yes
if yes,explain type of development and specify any other counties and
municipalities affected.
The project may induce additional housing projects, in turn which may be
the catalyst for developing additional commercial projects to serve them.
•
S. Is there sufficient capacity in the following public services to handle
the project and any associated growth?
Amount required
Public Service for project sufficiet tt capacj,ty?
27,900 II
water 71,5nn total gal/da yeS
wastewater treatment 25,000 II
Amno gal/da ypc
sewer approx. 1300 feet _ yes
• schools .N.A. pupils N.A.
3 II
solid waste disposal _ 77.5 total ton/mo yes
streets 0 wales yes —
other. (police, fire, etc) no additional _yes
If current major public facilities are not adequate, do existing local
plans call for expansion, or is expansion necessary strictly for this
one project and its associated impacts?
Expansion is necessary for this and other projects. The project is
consistent with city growth plans.
6. Is the project within a proposed or designated Critical Area or part
of a Related Actions EIS or other environmentally sensitive plan or
program reviewed by the EQC? X NO YES
If yes, specify which area or plan.
•
7. Will the project involve the use, transportation, storage, release
' or disposal of rotentially hazardous or toxic liquids, solids on
gaseous substances such as pesticides,-radioactive wastes, poisions, 1
• etc? X No YEs
If yes, please specify the substance and rate of usage and any measures ,
to be taken to minimize adverse environmental impacts from accidents.
• 1 ,bJ .
8. When the project has served its useful life, will retirement of the
facility require s?ecial measures or plans? _j_NO YES
If yes, specify'
K. HISTORIC RESOURCES 4,
1. Arc there any structures on the site older than 50 years or on federal
or state historical registers? X NO YES
• 2. Have any arrowheads, pottery or other evidence of prehistoric or early
settlement been found on the site? X NO YES
Night any known archaeologic or paleontological sites be affected
by the activity? X NO YES
3. List any site or structure identified in 1 and 2 and explain any.
impact on them.
Careful 'construction consistent with erosion control plans will allow
• early detection of any unexpected archaelogical sites.
L. OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
Describe any other major environmental effects which may not have been
identified in the previous sections.
None _
•
III. OTHER MITIGATIVE MEASURES
Briefly describe mitigative measures proposed to reduce or eliminate potential
adverse impacts that have not been described before.
Erosion control plans must be approved by the Nine Nile Watershed District.
City staff review of all public facilities and utilities, building permits,
etc.
City staff field review of all public works construction.
•
•
•
•
•
- 10 —
•
V. FINDINGS . .
The project is a private ( X) governmental ( ) action. The Responsible Agency
(Person), after consideration of the information in this EAW, and the factors
in Minn. Reg. MEQC 25, makes the following findings.
1. The project is ( ) is not (X ) a major action. •
State reasons:
See page 11 b 4 .. . •. .
• 2. The project does ( ) does not U_) have the potential for significant
environmental effects.
State reasons:
See page 11 b .
3. (For private actions only.) The project is ( ) is not (X ) of more than
local significance.
State Reasons: _ ..
See page 11 b
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND CERTIFICATION • • .
NOTE: A Negative Declaration or EIS Preparation Notice is not officially filed
• until the date of publication of the notice in the EQC Monitor section of
the Minnesota State Register. Submittal of the EAW to the EQC constitutes
a request for publication of notice in the M.Monitor.
A. I, the undersigned, am either the authorized representative of the Responsible
Agency or the Responsible Person identified below. Based on the above findings,
the Responsible Agency (Person) makes the following conclusions. (Complete
either 1 or 2).
1. NEGATIVE DECLARA•t7ON NOTICE
No EIS is needed'on this project, because the project is not a
major action and/or does not have the potential for significant
environmental effects and/or, for private actions only, the
project is not of more than local significance.
•
..
• _ 1
i
11 1111 I
•
•
1. •
The project occurs on a gently rolling meadow and will displace
only small mammals and ground nesting birds. Soil erosion is
only significant0if not mitigated by erosion control practices
as established by the Nine Mile Watershed District. Municipal
services such as sewer and water are to be extended to the site
as are natural gas and power. Other municipal services such as
police and fire protection , schools, and transportation systems
are being planned as capacities warrant.
2.
Assuming careful planning and construction , the environmental
effects of the project will be mitigated. The Anderson Lakes
shore is left undisturbed so the major wildlife should remain
intact. Very little tree cover exists , and none will have
• to be removed to accomplish this development.
3.
The development attempts to promote variety and careful placement
of buildings on the site and concentrates open space in more
usable areas ( land near Anderson Lakes Park ) in order to
preserve the natural amenities of the site for office.
•
• .
'11 b
•
• (/V
•
Y �'� -- �•:•e6• „„ t` s� V z c '*'I+ t /__...\ `.• Y .,yam .
"-\••4 " .. 2) x -C i \\
, .. "! '4_,:t ,T..F, I it' ...."1 2 • 1 ( \,, 7°7
5.
11
. a ',../. / \ // 5.:; \ . IA, \,.,,.:
;) ., t" tied .� -. `� ....... %big
%. .•
\'',' x
4. _
.,. i •,.:,-...• (2...----)Q....,,,,...:_i,,,,,,2....I ili . ..
P' '9; \;/' :-:, ' S. •,,.ec,F 419 \, 06-1.,
`•' ' ; T\ n.'. o n Z `Qm
m t' m Iye�1 n�(9 _
Qa s• \r,r / x �� ./1� 'O II i�I' S• / =S� if, • •f
m A iu et‘ P m ' o t Oil g' - n x \O
C— A it
t Q
0 •/ z i > e ! x "r'' „-N
1
a@�o 's�. " e % � : om „ (s f -
,!
>tip,
:.
1.
11%1
39
V . . �
r ., '36, ma, gn r 6 4gy z- • •� _ m may;
� ,
• \\� s mit
�
—- _'m` 4
•
-.7 '. n,• � n rt 'ly I'll ` '.,• '. .�1.•q
•
z T L- t�.( "Y 5 11
1: ' • •a ti, ,` ' :rt • I1 •e�4; �ii
'C'�f �`\�. ° i• T _ 's m s 11I ) ) - �.�J 'a,'R a� .••),r 1.1 j'�
. , `�. ,l 1 !lt•L'./ to, II '1 :,,, i. l•it \'.-• ;v,w, ♦ 1 .?,
_� `j • { j• r•,x' 6.. T- v, Y' _ Ll 4r nt I I. ,) s t 5`a ,.J n0 V.1 ..
)m• .�tt ' , , `r `f -11--'0� i ! ) . + V''..�.. `- "a i
F,T,t �r�� ,.\� \ l �,_��) to•.y��� / '�/n� 1 •• '{‘5.•` )Y••
•t!T t'�.1s..,� �`�i
_.,.. i N °J1`f,-6 ,;,:_ 2-'- . .. r \,41' •• i; ,t;tJ y 3•r• r r •,, ,,,"'.w'`, p C
:f t, v-.?,- ;.„,0 • , \
m• a/ N.
•
00.
'REPORT ON
SOIL INVESTIGATION
• CORPORATE EXPANSION PROPERTY
PARCEL A, THE PRESERVE
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
♦
We were retained by Mr. Emerson Greenberg of Gelco
Corporation to conduct a soil investigation at a property directly
west of the existing Gelco Building. The purposes of our work
were to determine the general soil and ground water conditions
at the site, and to prepare a report including comments about
foundation conditions for future building, any potential soil
problems, etc.
PROCEDURE
A total of eight (8) soil test holes were drilled at
the site on May 5 and 6, 1976. The field work was performed
using a truck-mounted CME-45B drill unit. The test holes were
advanced using 31/4" i.d. x 7" o.d. continuous flight, hollow stem
auger which acts as a temporary casing to prevent collapse of
the sides of the hole. Standard penetration tests were performed
in advance of the casing tip at 2 to 5 foot intervals of depth,
fully in accordance with procedures designated in A.S.T.M. D-1586,
Observations for ground water levels in the borings were made .
after completion.
ANN
n1 SUBTERRANEAN
Ij I�r�I I:NGiN1:1_IIING INC.••
All soil samples nbtaincd were brought to our
laboratory for examination and classification. They will be
retained for a period of at least 90 days from date of issue of
this report, after which they will be discarded unless we arc
otherwise notifped.
Drawing No. 1 is a site plan showing the soil test hole
locations. Detailed soil descriptions together with a plot of
the standard penetration test hlows per foot arc given on the
Borehole Log sheets, Drawings No. 2 and 3. Following the regular
written soil descriptions are capital letters in parentheses,
which represent the appropriate group symbols of the Unified Soil
Classification System. A chart explaining this system is appended.
•
All elevations in this report arc to geodetic datum,
and were obtained using the bench mark noted on the site plan.
SITE AND GEOLOGY
The property under study abuts on the north side of
Anderson Lake. It has a decided slope from the north to the lake
margin at the south, with approximately a 40 to 45 foot differcnc •
in elevation across a distance of approximately 1000 feet. The
site surface is also irregular, and there is a small mound or
• ridge within the central to south-central portion of the property.
ApIN
,. r SUBTERRANEAN
( iy� LLI ENGINEERING INC.
MINNI:APOI.IS. MINN
,
4�
r . 1
"'1 The natural soils at this site arc all related to an
early stage of the Des Moines ice lobe of the Wisconsin glaciation•
These soils tend to be variable in composition, both laterally
•
and vertically. They include a clayey glacial till material
containing randOf lenses or stringers of sand, and strata of •
silty sand and clayey sand. However the clayey glacial till
material is the most predominant. In post-glacial times some
silty organic soils have formed at the surface.
The inorganic glacial soils have been well consolidated •
in the past, first by a glacial ice re-advance, and second by
• desiccation as the ground water table in the area lowered to its
present level.
•
According to information published by the State of
Minnesota Geological Survey, the uppermost bedrock stratum under .
the site is believed to be St. Peter sandstone, and probably
occurs at a depth of at least 50 to 70 feet below present ground
surface.
SOIL CONDITIONS •
Topsoil •
The site is covered by a 6 inch to 3h foot layer of
topsoil. This material is a black to brownish-black organic silt
with traces of fine sand. The topsoil is moist and loose, and is
unsuitable for foundation or floor slab support.
...i
111)-�A SUP.TT�;TLRANLAN
[i'v 1-1 }•:NGINI:I 1 ING INC,
`c 1- MINNKAI'111.Iti MINN
Silt and Silty rinc Sand
In tho vicinity of our test hole 6 the topsoil is
underlain by a 3 foot thick stratum of fine grained silt and sand
material which is moist and loose. We believe that this is a
•
former lakeshore deposit.
Des Moines Glacial Soils
The major soil types at this site occur directly below •
the topsoil and silt at depths of h to 31/2 feet .below grade. These
soils extend well beyond the terminal depths of the borings.
•
•
The principal soil type is a sandy clay with traces of
gravel and some random sand lenses. This material has very low
plasticity and is stiff to very tough in consistency.. It has
moderate load-bearing capacity and low compressibility, and is
thus suitable for foundation support.
• Included with the sandy clay deposits are strata of
silty sand of varying gradation. These soils arc loose to medium
dense. Thcy would perform well under a structure, if they are
confined by a surcharge of fill or natural sandy clay.
•
'
•
•
.11
•
:,- SUBTERRANEAN
11'13 ISNGINEERING INC.
++ti MINNEAPOI.IS. MINN
. (-- to
• • .
GROUND WATER CONDITIONS
Free ground water was observed in 6 of the 8 borings.
Final static water levels were at depths of 2.5 to 13.0 feet below
ground surface. When this information is plotted on a site plan
it indicates thd4 there is a definite ground water gradient througi
Parcel A from the north end down toward the sanitary sewer line
at the south end, with the ground water elevations ranging between
851.6 to the north to lower than 836.0 feet adjacent to the sewer
line. There is also a gradient from the existing Celco Building
immediately adjacent to the east, down toward the south-west.
• The permanent ground water table at this site is of
course directly related to the prevailing water level in Anderson
• Lake, at elevation 835.3 to 835.8 feet. The other grouna water
levels observed above the lake elevation represent a perched
and transient ground water condition, resulting from surface .
drainage water at the roadway system north of the property, which
is finding its way toward the lake through pervious sand seams
within the soil.
DEVILOPMENT PLANS
Dofin'te development plans for this site have not yet
been formulated. It is likely that the first use of the property
will be as a paved parking lot to handle overflow parking from
. the neighboring Celco Building. At some future time it is likely
w.' that an office building will be erected.
�{ SU13TER.RANEAN
�1i 11.1.1.1_I ENGINEERING INC.
MtNNvAi'm tc MINN
I
0
ANALYSIS ANI) RIiCOMENDATIONS
The soil conditions arc generally quite favorable for
foundation support. A building at this property may be supported
upon conventional spread footing foundations based directly on
the natural soi1y. The actual allowable soil bearing pressures
and footing elevations will have to be established at a later date,
when building plans become available., since they are dependent
upon column spacing, type and height of structure, and other
similar factors.
•
Tho practical significance of the perched ground water
condition is that any excavation at this property deeper than
approximately 8 feet is likely to encounter some seepage from
.� • the uph._11 side. However the quantity of such seepage is not
anticipated to be great, and it could be readily handled by
gravity drainage to lower land downhill. The uphill basement
wall would have to be very thoroughly waterproofed, and
consideration would also have to be given to installation of
an exterior tile drain system at that wall, in order to avoid any
potential dampness problems at the north end of the basement.
With regard to the installation of a paved parking lot
at this property, it is recommended that all of the black organic
topsoil should be stripped and removed prior to any pavement
construction. The topsoil is somewhat thicker than usual at
•
.011
: SU13TER,E.ANEAN
1'11 j tl ENG1NI:ERING INC.
MINNEAPOLIS. MINN
this property, and a 2 food :►verage thickness may be used for •
earthwork estimating purposes only.. The pavement design should
be as follows: •
• 2" hot-mix bituminous wearing surface,
Minnesota Highway Department 2341 or 2351 mix.
6" compacted., granular base course,
M.H.D. Class 5 material. •
•
GENERAL •
The soil conditions have been established at our test
hole locations only. There may be variations in conditions betweei I
j
and around the borings, and linear interpolation or extrapolation 1'
of the results is not warranted. j.
. 1
A„, For future building construction at this site it would
be advisable to make some suppl-mentary soil borings at the
specific building location. •
•
1 1
' •
II
•
/
IPS
,•, :.--�; =; SUBTERRANEAN
• 1 , .►_ ENGINEERING INC.
• I���� MINNEAI'OLIS. MINN.
.
•
•
•
During construction operations on this property all
earthwork, fill placement and compaction, installation of sub-
drainage systems, should be inspected and tested by a qualified
soil engineer. We would be pleased to provide the field inspectioi
services. •
•
•
The recommendations and opinions stated in this, report
arc necessarily of a general nature. We should be'consulted
further as planning for construction at this site progresses,
in order that we may have the opportunity of reviewing.the soil
recommendations as they relate to a specific plan.'
Submitted May 11, 1976
SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC.
•
•
(}41.1;j1Ca
Mer yn M ndess
Registered Professional Engineer
n 1 1
MM/lp •
•
Distribution: 4cc. Gelco Corporation,
Attn: Mr. Emerson Greenberg
lei. File
•
SUBTERRANEAN
•
• c'orZ� ENGINEERING INC.
fl')1APIIgrMINNEAPOLIS, MINN.
The Leonard Parker Associates
DESIGN OBJECTIVES >;elco Office Park
PRIMARY
•
- All buildings to have all-weather linkage. •
- All buildings to MMdve simple efficient configuration.
•
- Retain design integrity of existing building. •
- Optimize views of lake.
SECONDARY
- Minimize length of linkage.
- All buildings beyond Stage II to have potential of two additional 'floors. •
- Minimize distance from parking.
•
- Avoid existing utility lines. •
- Preserve west access drive to West 78th Street.
- Screen against northwest winds.
- Open to sun orientation.
The Leonard Parker Associates
•
CONSTRAINTS
- •Amount of impervious surface (paving and roof) is not to exceed 30%
of total lot area. •
- Impervious surface cannot occur within 50 feet of normal high water
mark. `
- No building can occur within 150 feet of normal high water mark.
- Maximum building height of 35 feet unless submitted as a planned •
unit development proposal,
•
- An Environmental Assessment Worksheet will be required:
•
a, When building coverage on lot exceeds 20,000 sq. ft.
b. When length of shoreline exceeds 1,500 feet.
c. When one thousand or more vehicle trips are generated in any
one hour.
Note: Preparation, submission and approval of the EAW will require •
30 to 45 days. This will have an adverse effect on schedule leading
to start of construction date unless Yre are able to continue design
work on the Stage II building during the review period on EAW. a•
•
%
•
•
•
1119
The Leonard Parker Associates
ASSUMPTIONS •
- That the total site under optimum utilization can accommodate approxi-
mately 500,000 gross square feet in building for 2,500 people.
- That buildings will be added as required up to a maximum development
of from four to separate but linked buildings.
•
- Restriction of 30% impervious surface allows for an additional
300,000 square feet of building with surface parking. Beyond that
the parking would be ramped over the surface parking.
- Rooftops will be planted to maximize surface parking by not being
added into the total impervious surface.
•
•
•
1113
The Leonard Parker Associates
BUILDING USE PROFILE
Additional Stage I
EW Scheme Sq. Ft. Floors Parking Parking
Stage II I20,000 3 600 210
Surface
s
Stage II alt. 160,000 4 800 210
Stage II alt. 200,000 5 1000 210
Stage III 120,000 7 600
Surface
Stage IV 120,000 7 600
Ramp
Stage V 120,000 7 600
Ramp
Totals 505,000 1200 Surface
1200 Ramp
•
•
•
l/1 ;1
2.
EIS PREPARATION NO'PICF
An EIS will be prepared on this project because the project is a 4;
major action and has the potential for significant environmental
Yr
effects. For private actions, the project is also of more than
local significance. T,,
a. The MEN Rules provide that physical construction or operation of the 1:
project must stop when an EIS is required. In special circumstances, is
the +E'2C can specifically authorize limited construction to begi:l or'
continue. If you feel there are special circumstances in this
project, specify the extent of pregrees recommended and the reasons.
b. Date Draft EIS will be submitted:
(month) (day) (year)
(MEQC Rules require that the Draft EIS be submitted within 120 days
of publication of the EIS Preparation Notice in the EQC Monitor.. If
special circumstances prevent compliance with this time limit, a
• written request for extension explaining the reasons for the request
must be submitted to the EQC Chairman.)
c. The Draft EIS will be prepared by (list Responsible Agency(s) or
Persc-fs)):
Signature
City Manager, Roger Ulstad Title ;
Date
B. Attach an affidavit certifying the date that copies of this EAW were mailed
to all points on the official EQC distribution list, to the city and county
directly impacted, and to adjacent counties or municipalities likely to be
directly impacted by the proposed action (refer to question iiI.J.4 EAWon age 9
of the EAW). The affidavit need be attached only to the copy
of the which is sent to the EQC. •
C. Billing procedures for E22 Monitor Publication
I'
State agency Attach to the EAW sent to the EQC a completed OSR 100
ONLY: form (State Register General Order Form--available at Central
Stores). For instructions, please contact your Agency's
Liaison Officer to the State Register or the Office of the
State Register-.-(612) 296-8239.
•
) • 12
•
MEMO
TO: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager •l)
l
�L•
FROM: Sandy Worts, Recreation Supervisor
DATE: July 13, 1978
SUBJECT: Mitchell Lake - L1NCON Grant Application
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will he discussing
the resubmission of the Mitchell Lake L'NCON Application at their eceting
on Monday, July 17, 1978, so a recommendation is not available at this
time. I will have a memo with their recommendation to you on Tuesday, •
July 1$ before the meeting. We will need approval by the Council on July
18 as the application must be submitted by July 28, 1978 to the State
Planning Agency. •
SI%:and
:, .. ;k c ;•e;.11.!. F,•r:n C-JiT (15-4J3)
yie :ul' tr r . :t d it c. , ;Jr-, ':ry. ^ _ $P.. ..:- tc to considered
,:y cal cr 1,-;:,-. ..:,
..:'ere tc '..
- •es c _,:, with ;r.or:ed d.:u:.r:ation to: Pork and Recreation
Grants ` -f' r ao- c v, F R 2':10, raoitol S-.a-a Puilding, St. Paul,
V. . to . .c.l tan Council, !7L Mttro Souare Building,
'.h c _ .' , St. -ul, . rcr,to E5101. - .
A. .. .t: , of ;ulis :al B. P,rson to ..in it utr irs r..at plica-
,:ivisl;r s .:c t'-e e_:eat. tion s'',.old be directed.
•
City of :.'en Prairie --.e Robert lar, art
c950 ccr Prairie Road Director of Cutr. n ty Szrvic's
Title -
- Er,::n Prairie . ilenrepin t, -!s 8950 en rairie ;ed
',t344 612 541-2262 65344 r,12 'di-2262
ao ar'.a Zp : ac P .e
C. 1, t ct. Con,^unity Lakes Parks - Mitchell take Park
D. Ti-, -.t-• Arquisit;on [t Levelcicent (_A .o.+bination 1 l
E. List r:.-'tatic•a11 .Ses
i.t,.:i-t fo- t o ;_rk:
__picnicking,picniicking. canoeing, field Dames,_general -dark develo;:nent ._.- _----
F. list a oa ...isition .r.iccts and recreational facilities for deselc;.-ant projects
.
and tai cost. pr'� .e6 in this application,
A uisit;J• e:to nt elt�.:._rt Protects-- _
tin. 6i -.-s - :at .c+ r yuec:td or Type of lea i iitY
_.._ lenoth of focility facility Cost
73.68 5500,000 (e..r._:e hna' of
_._ _
G. Sta:e o:.:':s of lc,-al !..'.c'; f:..di:1g. _.___ ____ _______ _ .._--_- __ .. _
(note: C1l unit! - ',•:,lde
1 _ 1 n�r� to
?CS for L1-;_a.', p�:jeets and �:,. for _ _
LC",R) _. --- - --- - - .
1°68 Park Fond Issue Funds and TOTAL case
"cash-in-lieu of lands" funds
col,_cted from R;al Estate_
r'el e l oilers
f:. Att;:', a c....,ty, ::ic°cal or plat can Sh4a1ng location of project„ identifying the
•r.. r::d, and ,f cot laid c•:.,_rship. - .
1. ..h a S;tt ;;p s',,,.;nc i„•eels to Le orquired or fa:I:itites to t•o constructed in
•
this appi:cation.
•
J. Attache copy of the future 5 ytar recreation action plan of the applicant unit of
goeen,r.nt, incl udinc cost estiratrs of aceuisit ion, , r'-i ii.:nnt, and maintenance of
Tear,ation a:-,Pc will r the jurisdiction of the :ppli ant In cate any type of choral
resJ,urco ordit..:,:r- ,.tad by the applicant (for c,..:::le, s'wreland, sti,de tree disrene
control, erosion i,rtt' 1, etc.). _. _ _ i
F. Cite the projr--ts W.,rrr.ce to the recreational plan of the governmental unit raking
the applicatiae ..,d any priority ranking of that project within the plan.
Short quote referencing Short qir,.te of any , I
Title of P1.n l.tr ";tii!.!..-d Pacie NO._ prat. sedprojector eaa priority rt`tronce of
- - project - i '!
Preserve natural_ . .
Coi ,reherrsive Guide Plan '68 75 amenities 1
t. E.,ruri,,,.
V.Vi o" ".t a1,1,1;5m•t :as car of tniS ,i elm U.ar)' acDisci tton to Pr e.e:uted.
July 10 I. .1 -
,t urt'
Director of Coiunity Services