Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/16/1978 JOHN FRANE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 16, 1978 7:30 PM, CITY HALL • COUNCIL MEMBERS. Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Rye, Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulsted; City Attorney Ross Thorfinnson; Planner Chris Loner; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; Engineer • Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Set Public Hearing for June 7, 1978 for Amsden Hills IV, Page 11E5 rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 for 11 duplexes B. Set Public Hearin for June 7, 1978 for Darkenwald Duplexes, Page 1185A rezeniny_ from Rural to R1-13.5 for2 existing single family homes and rezoningfrom Rural to R_6.S for 48 duplex lots, and ,,.,;iminary_platapproval C. Set Public Hearin for June 7, 1978 for vacation of Franlo Road west from Anderson Lakes Parkway to west line of Misden Hills IV Addition D. Final plat approval for Edenvale 14th Addition (Resolution Page ]19u {, • E. Preliminary and Final Plat approval for Edenvale 5th Page 11E9 I Addition-ilesolution No. 78-94) F. Clerk's License List Page 1192 G. Payment of Claims Nos. 10052 - 10186 Page 1193 `,{; III. MINUTES A. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, Page 1196 Aprill 18, 1978 ---- B. Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, Page 1203 April 27, 1978 --� IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Hill-.horcugh and Hillsborou<h Second, The Pi_eservez rezynina Pare 1204 1_rov Rural to R1-13 dud prelimirary_pii ac'+roval oi £0 and 721 acres into 139 lots. Lot size and setback variances requested. (Resolution No. 78-53, approving preliminary plat, Ordinance No. 78-15, rezoning to R.1-13.5, and Resolution No. 78-59, granting PUD approval) CONTINUFO PUBLIC HEARING FROM APRIL 4, 1978 Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,May 16, 1978 B. Prairie East 4th, 5th & 6th, request by Hustad Development Page 1215 Corporation for PUD approval, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 and 849 and R1-13.5, and preliminary plat approval. The additions are located in the NE and NW corners of Franlo Road and Co. Rd. 1. (Resolution No. 78-92, approving PUD, Ordinance No. 78-22, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5., and Resolution No. 78-65, approving preliminary plats) CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FROM APRIL 18, 1978 C. Prairie East 7th, 8th and 9th, request by Hustad Development Page I215 Corporation for reaffirmation of PUD multiple concept, and 882 rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5, and preliminaryplat approval. The additions are located north of Prairie East 2nd and east of the 2nd and 3rd Additions. (Ordinance No. 78-23, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5, and Resolution No. 78-66, approving preliminary plat) CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FROM APRIL 18, 1978 D. 8achman-Anderson Center, request by Bachman Anderson, Inc. Page 1233 for rezoning from Rural to Office for approximately 12 acres located north of Anderson Lakes and South of I-494. Ordinance No. 78-26) V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS VI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Rego-"- by Dr. Lund for an interim Office Use Permit Agreement Page 1258 for a single family residence at 7928 Eden Road B. Request from Timothy Eller, Assistant Vice President. of Centex Page 1268 Homes, to appear before the Council • VII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 78-90. PERA for CETA employees Page 1269 8. Resolution No. 78-37, approving preliminary plat for COR Page 1271 investment • C. 2nd Readir!j of Ordinance No. 78-25, rezoning from Rural to Page 1272 RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 for Raven Ridge by Edenvale and rezoning agreement D. Resolution No. 78-96, acquisition of utility easement Page 1280 across Lot 4, Block 1, Edenview Addition, I. C. 51-300 VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOAROS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager 1. Resort on rezoning agreement for Condon/Naegele Realms Page 1283 2. Rescheduling of July 4, 1978 Council meeting Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,May 16, 1978 :a'. 4 B. Report of City Manager (continued) 3. Set date for next Guide Plan meeting 4. Appointment of City Attorney 5. Request from League of Minnesota Cities Page 1285 6. Receive and award bids for two satellite stations and Page 1286 rj an addition to the main facility for the Fire Department 7. Definition of Section 2, Subd. 2.7 of Ordinance No. 135, Page 1290 ;? pecial Requirements pertaining to Design C. Report of City Engineer 1. Receive feasibility report for extension of sanitary Page 1292 sewer on Eden Road - AMOCO site, I.C. 51-320 (Resolution ) No. 78-95) 'j 2. Discussion of transportation projects and priorities Page 1304 .J ,I ti IX. NEW BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT. ,I 1 I i {: i i �-r ThcL- c erve April 26, 197P Mr. Roger Ulstad City Manager City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Public Hearings for Amsden IV Dear Mr. Ulstad: The Preserve has submitted the necessary documentation and there- fore respectfully requests the following public hearings: 1 - Preltsiinary Plat before the Planning Commission on ,, May(, 1979. - Rezoning before the City Council on June 'cr, 197P. Subject to favorable consideration of the Planning Commission, the Council could be renuested to set this hearing at their May 16 meeting. 3 - Vacation of the westerly 558' of old knsden Road by the City Council on June 6, 1g7n. This is "clean up" work and not a function of platting or zoning. This letter also grants approval to the City of Eden Prairie for the City's construction and maintenance of "proposed development signage" at a mutually agreeable location in the proposed project area. Very truly yours, THE PRESERVE ee W. Johpion Vice President - Engineering L6'J/jl i. cc: Chris Fnger 11111 Anderson Lakes Parkway,Eden Prairie,Minnesota 553.14 • (612)941 2001 f/ o l May 10, 1978 yy 9 To Mayor and Eden Prairie City Council: As the Planning Commission has completed review of our request to rezone 10 acres from Rural to RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 (for 2 existing single family homes), at the southwest corner of Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard, we would request the City Council set a date for a public hearing at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, // C- /(iC/fe �'l y`,,t Gil Darkenwald • Darkenwald Real Estate, Inc. 11803 Franlo Road • Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 il r7i f r ,1 May 16, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-93 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT i, OF EDENVALE 14TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Edenvale 14th Addition has been submitted in t the manner required for platting land under the Eden Priarie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and 9 WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin- ances of the City of Eden Prairie. i! NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat Approval Request for Edenvale 14th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated May 10, 1978. A B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, . , ^_mod. 1 waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said Engineer's Report. C. That the City Clerk is herby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. • E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. e' ADOPTED by the City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: May 10, 1978 SUBJECT: EDENVAI_E 14TH ADDITION PROPOSAL: The Developer, Edenvale, Inc., is requesting City Council approval of the final plat of Edenvale 14th Addition. This is a 39 lot single family residential plat (R1-13.5) located north of Edenvale Boulevard and west of Edenvale 11th Addition. This is a replat of Outlot F, Edenvale 3rd Addition. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved on June 14, 1977, per Council Resolution No 77-77. Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on August 5, 1977, per Ordinance No. 77-24. The Developer must maintain a minimum of 43 feet lot frontage at • the pr^^°rty line and 70 feet at the building setback line on all cul-de-sacs as required in the 4/5/77 Planning Staff report, to conform with the approved Preliminary Plat. The Developer plans staging development with the second addition to • follow as financing and marketing allow. VARIANCES: The following setback variances have been requested by the • developer and should be allowed for this plat. These variances were approved in the Rezoning Agreement dated July 28, 1978. 5' garage to side lot line 10' 1 and 11 story house to side lot line 15' 2 story house to side lot line 30' Front of building to front lot line, except 25' on cul-de-sac 20' Rear of house to rear lot line 20' side yard setback for houses built on corner lots but not conflicting with 30' setbacks on adjacent lots Variance from City Ordinance No 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat. The request for this variance should be allowed because the Developer has proceeded with this plat in a reasonable and efficient manner. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, 4' concrete curb and gutter, bituminous paving and walkways will be installed throughout the development in accordance with City standards. - 2 - A temporary turnaround conforming with the City requirements for cul-de-sacs must be provided at the northerly end of Kurtz Lane. The street name Susan Court will be deleted with homes numbered from Kurtz Lane. Walkways will be installed in the locations shown on Exhibit "8" of the July 28, 1977, Rezoning Agreement. This included a limestone or grass pathway over Outlot A and between Edenvale 11th and 14th Additions ! and a paved pathway along Edenvale Boulevard. The northerly 50 feet of Outlot B will be used for access to the exist- ing single family home located to the west of the proposed plat. This 50 foot area should become a separate Outlot and be dedicated to the #' City. The remainder of Outlot B is designated as open space and buffer area with ownership and maintenance by the Edenvale Homeowners Association. PARK DEDICATION: Outlot A and the remaining portion of Outlot 8, as described above will be used for pathways and open space with ownership and main- tenance by the Edenvale Homeowners Association. Park dedication requirements for this plat have been satisfied through approved Edenvale PUD, therefore park dedication fees will not be required. BONDING: A ,.orformance bond or letter of credit, approved by the City Attorney, shall be posted in an amount by the City Engineer, to cover the cost of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, walkways and street signs. A cash deposit of $608.40 will be required to cover the installation and ;k first year maintenance costs for street lighting. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Edenvale 14th 1 Addition subject to the requirements of this report and the following: 1. Execution of the Developers Agreement. j 2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the 1. amount of $1170. 3. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 4. Receipt of cash deposit of $608.40 for street lighting. CJJ:KH May 16, 1978 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-94 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Edenvale Industrial Park 5th Addition has been sub • - mitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance • Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and '. WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the Ciyt of Eden Prairie. `'. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY CDUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat Approval Request for Edenvale Industrial Park 5th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated May 10, 1978. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy o," ,his resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy ; ' of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named Plat. . ' i C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL . John D. Frane, Clerk + CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: May 10, 1978 SUBJECT: EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK. 5TH ADDITION • PROPOSAL: Edenvale, Inc., is requesting City Council approval of the preliminary and final plat of Edenvale Industrial Park 5th Addition. The 4 lot Indus • - trial 0-5 and I-2) plat is located north of Martin Drive and east of corporate way. • HISTORY: The Planning Commission recommended preliminary plat approval to the • • City Council on November 14, 1977. This area including Lots 3 and 4 was zoned I-5 Park through description 9-3 of Ordinance N135. The area including Lots 1 and 2 was zoned 1-2 Park by the City Council on August 5, 1977, per Ordinance N77-17. The final plat now submitted for approval conforms with the preliminary plat approved by the Planning Commission. VARIANCES: Variance from the minimum lot size and side yard setback require- ments of Ordinance #135 should be allowed as follows: Minimum lot size 1.1 acre Minimum lot width 134 feet Minimum lot depth 230 feet Front setback 30 feet Sideyard setback 10:20 feet Rear Setback 25 feet These variances were previously approved in Edenvale Industrial Park 3rd and 4th Additions and were recommended for approval by the Planning Com • - mission. Outside storage will be prohibited and parking within the 30 foot front setback will not be allowej. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, con- crete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing have been installed through- out the development in accordance with City standards. WIC) - 2 - „P,. Sanitary sewer and water services to Lot I and Lot 3 must be extended from .S. existing services. These extensions will be placed by the individual i1: builders with the developer paying all additional costs. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedicaiton requirements for this plat have been satisfied through approval of the Edenvale PUD, therefore a cash contribution will not be required. CJJ:kh h t • j. i • 119I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST May 16, 1978 CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) Aqualand Pool Co. Don Dahl Construction Co. Robert 0. Westlund Construction Co. PLUMBING Hayes Contractors Thoen Plumbing, Inc. SOLICITOR'S LICENSE Ter_encP Lee Swedzinski These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for the licensed activity. e;) Rebecca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk May 16, 1978 STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following_accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 04-18-78 9364 ( 82.27) 04-28-78 9458 (205.60) 10052 PETTY CASH Reimburse fund 48.22 10053 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 167.16 10054 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING Liquor and wine 256.29 10055 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. Liquor 643.37 10056 JOHNSON BROTHERS Liquor 830.45 10057 ED PHILLIPS AND SONS Liquor 939.54 10058 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 50.00 10059 RAMADA, INN. Lodging for six firemen at State convention 180.00 05-02-78 10060 RONNIE H. AND BETTY M. STEVENS Easement 2,536.00 10061 I.IINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL Seminar registration for Public Safety officer 25.00 10062 HOLIDAY INN. Lodging for Public Safety officer to attend seminar 40.00 10063 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employees withheld and employer ASSN. contribution 4-28 payroll 5,865.92 10064 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK Bonds deducted 4-28 payroll 318.75 10065 UNITED FUND Donations deducted 4-28 payroll 27.12 10066 STATE OF MINNESOTA Taxes withheld for April 6,551.20 10067 FEDE1.AL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 4-28 payroll 7,361.63 05-03-78 10068 POSTMASTER Postage for utility bills 63.36 05-05-78 10069 SANDY WERTS Cash for Bryant and Riley Lake 50.00 10070 ED PHILLIPS & SONS Liquor and wine 754.99 10071 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. Liquor 517.35 10072 JOHNSON BROTHERS Liquor 462.33 10073 OLD PEORIA CO. Liquor 383.78 10074 QUALITY WINE CO. Wine 356.14 10075 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING Wine 344.16 10076 AMERICAN EATER WORKS ASSN. Registration fee for convention 75.00 10077 UNITED AIRLINES Air fare for Water Works convention 250.00 10078 RAMADA INN Lodging for Water Works convention 300.00 05-12-78 10079 AKINS FIRE EQUIPMENT Supplies-Fire dept. 7.80 10080 ADVANCE AMBULANCE Supplies-Fire dept. 142.47 10081 AMERICAN BANK Destroying of coupons 50.00 10082 SCOTT ANDERSON Services for life guard test _ 28.00 10083 AMOCO OTL Fuel 34.39 10084 ARTEKA, INC. Trees-Community Development project 109.00 10085 ASTLEFORO EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment parts 35.35 • 10086 ARH WELDING Steel tube-City garage 6.20 10087 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY Repair parts and service 159.99 10068 GLUE CROSS May insurance 450.70 10089 LES BRIDGER Expenses 13.29 10090 BRYAN ROAD PRODUCTS Rock-Street Maint. dept. 1,317.13 10041 BUSINESS FURNITURE, INC. New desk and repair of chair-Public Safety dept. 253.46 10092 BATTERY WAREHOUSE, INC. Equipment parts 81.16 I1Ii'. May 16, 1978 05-12-78 10093 CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK City share of Suburban Health 18.43.43 Nursing service 8 10094 CITY OF EDINA Water samples 1,236.4847 10095 CUTLER-MAGNER CO. Quicklime-Water dept. 10096 COPY EQUIPMENT CO. Supplies-Engineering dept. 3.50 10D97 CLUTCH & U-JDINT Equipment parts and repair service 181.04 1D098 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO. Desk signs-Community Service dept. 80.97 28 10099 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS, INC. Equipment parts 1D100 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO. Bid ads 15.9O 63.04 1D101 DURO-TEST CORPORATION Bulbs for Liquor store 106.38 10102 CHRIS ENGER April expenses 10103 ECKLUND & SWEDLUND Platform for cabinet-Liquor store 124.0C 10104 ESS BROTHERS & SONS Grates-City sewers 82.00 10105 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT Gasoline 2,244.86 10106 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY Raincoats-Street Maint. dept. 84.9C 10107 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS March and April legal ads 798.13 1010E FUTURE PUBLICATION, INC. Service-Park & Rec. dept. 21.70 101D9 ANTHONY FIORENTINO Reimbursement for postage for firearm • 5.01 safety films 10110 F.Y.S. FRAMING, INC. Framing of awards-Public Safety dept. 61.65 10111 FOX VALLEY MARKING SYSTEMS Marking paint-Water dept. 69.16 10112 FEFD-RITE CONTROLS Ferric sulfate-Water dept. 1,799.8C 10113 GROSS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES Cleaning supplies-Liquor store 8.50 10114 GUNNAR ELECTRIC Lamps-Park Maint. dept. 20.30 10115 GUrs AUTO SUPPLY Brake repair parts 320.25 10116 HENNEPIN COUNTY Special assessment fees 192.1E 10117 CAROL HEDGE Refund on tennis lessons 9.0C 10118 HARMON GLASS Repair windshield net of insurance 50.00 10119 HOPKINS PLBG. & HTG. Repair chlorinator water line-Water 4 dept. 47.15 10120 JACK HACKING Expenses 25.0C 10121 HUB OFFICE PRODUCTS Supplies-Public Safety dept. 35.1C 10122 HOPKINS FIRE DEPT. Dues-Fire dept. 5.0C 10123 HOPKINS DODGE SALES Equipment parts 22.4F 10124 HENNEPIN COUNTY Taxes on Park property 3,779.36 10125 VOID CHECK .6C 10126 ITASCA EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment parts 3 1111.6 10127 ELIZABETH JOHNSON April services 67.32 7 10128 JAMES JENSEN Mileage-Planning dept. 10129 KOKESH Plaques for Awards night 61.5C 10130 KARIJLF HARDWARE Supplies 430.93 10131 KRAEMER'S HARDWARE Supplies 174.14 10132 ROBERT LAMBERT April expenses 100.00 10133 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR Equipment parts for City garage $8, Equipment for Park Maint. $4,710 4,717.96 10134 t1INNESOTA DAILY Employment ads-Park & Rec. dept. 16.00 10135 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION June sewer service charges 13,456.19 10136 MARTIN BUSH IRON CO. Pipe-Soccer fields 90.5C 10137 METROPOLITAN FIRE EXTINGUISHER Recharge units-Fire dept. 19.75 10138 VOID CHECK 3.4 01 10139 t1EDCENTER HEALTH PLAN May insurance 1,0 10140 t•1 M INDUSTRIES, INC. Car wash powder-City garage 573 71 2.77 10141 MINNEGASCO Service t i`3' • May 16, 1978 05-12-78 10142 METROPOLITAN ANIMAL PATROL SERVICES April services 972.00 10143 MALKERSON MOTORS Equipment parts 11.60 10144 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. Asphalt-Street !taint. dept. 432.68 10145 MATT'S AUTO SERVICE Towing service 165.00 10146 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK Bond payment 54,650.75 10147 NAS & FCA, INC. Guide book-Fire dept. 10.00 10148 NIELSEN, BLACKBURN, MERRITT Legal services 1,843.45 10149 NORTHERN FORD ENGINES Equipment parts 40.37 10150 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. Service 1,144.96 10151 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN May insurance 4,098.12 10152 POWER, INC. Battery-Fire dept. 42.84 10153 PEPSI-COLA Pop for machines 121.25 10154 ALEC RUTH Survey lath-Engineering dept. 49.80 10155 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES Equipment rental-Tree Disease dept. 453.75 10156 RIDGE DOOR SALES CO. Repair door at Public Works bldg. 189.20 10157 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO., INC. Carpet for fire station 325.00 10158 SEARS ROEBUCK Electric air cleaner, dehumidifier for City Hall and overalls for Public Safety dept. 646.44 10159 STEPHANIE SCHUFT Refund on dance lessons 1.20 10160 SEELYE PLASTICS, INC. Repair parts for water line-Water dept. 52.67 10161 GORDON SMITH CO. Diesel oil and equipment parts 1,320.18 10162 DON STREICHER GUNS Ammunition for Public Safety 108.05 1016.3 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CO. Equipment parts 52.43 10164 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Parts for Public Safety cars 3B.40 10165 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. Uniforms for Public Safety and Fire dept. 1,354.92 10166 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE Catalog-Community Services dept. 20.00 10167 VIKING PIONEER Refund on vending machine licenses 20.00 10168 VAUGHN'S Flags 133.11 10169 JULI 1•IALTER Refund on gymnastics 6.00 10170 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO. May insurance 336.65 10171 WAGNER LAMP, INC. Hocky rink lights 86.44 10172 WATER PRODUCTS CO. Repair parts-Water dept. 546.24 10173 WILENSKY AUTO PARTS Repair starter 150.00 10174 WHOLESALE LIGHTING, INC. Light bulbs for Water plant 106.50 10175 XEROX CORPORATION Service and supplies 3,306.3E 10176 YOURS'N OURS, INC. Pocket jackets-Fire dept. 32.40 10177 ZECO CO. Equipment parts 17.61 10178 JIM ZAIC Tuition for class 35.00 10179 ZIEGLER, INC. Tires-Park Maint. dept. 868.68 10180 MINN. RECREATION & PARK ASSN. Team registrations-Park & Rec. dept. 418.00 10181 BERGERSON-CASWELL, INC. Est. No. 1-Well pumphouse #3 15,300.00 10182 JOHNSON BROTHERS CORP. Est. No. 1- Eden View I 149,405.40 10183 P. C. I. Est. No. 7-TH169 26,115.79 10184 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC. May insurance 883.80 10185 B. DALTON BOOK STORE Books-Public Safety dept. 42.60 10186 STATE OF MINNESOTA Criminal code books-Public Safety 70.00 TOTAL 330,745.6f OS • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 18, 1978 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Ross Thorfnager Roger Ulstad; AttorneyCity innson; Planner Chris Enger Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; City Engineer Carl Jullie; Finance Director John Frane, and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATIDN: Councilman Dave Dsterholt PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were requested to be added to the Council agenda: A. Settin: date for next Guide Plan meetifl (Under item VII. C.) B. Rauenhorst settlement (Under item VII. B.) C. Continuing liaison with the Metropolitan Airports Commission (Under item VIII) MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. CONSENT CALENDAR A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-20, rezoning_of a 22 foot strip west • of I-5 District from Rural to 1-5 Park for Richard Anderson B. Final plat approval for Basswoods 4th Townhouse Addition (Resolution No. 78-71) C. Final_plat approval for Nestlebrook Addition (Resolution No. 78-72) D. Final plat approval for Maple Leaf 6th Addition (Resolution No. 78-73) E. R.L.S. approval for Lots 4 and 5Block 1, Highpoint 3rd Addition F. Clerk's License List G. PaLment of Claims Nos. 9282 - 9409 11`i�v • Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,April 18, 1978 II. CONSENT CALENDAR (continued) H. Request to set a Public Hearing for May 16, 1978 for Bachman-Anderson Center by Bachman Anderson, Inc., for rezoning from Rural to Office for approximately 12 acres located north of Anderson Lakes and South of I-494 MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve all items on the Consent Calendar. Roll Call Vote: Bye, Osterholt, Meyers, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. III. MINUTES A. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 21, 1978 Pg. 9, 9th para.,lst line, strike "Bob" and insert "Dr. Richard" MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the minutes of the • Council meeting held Tuesday, March 21, 1978, as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. B. Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, March 30, 1978 MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the minutes of the Special City Council meeting held Thursday, March 30, 1978, as published. Motion carried unanimously. C. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 4, 1978 Pg. 5, last para., 1st and 2nd line, strike "scenic easements and will be" Pg. 7, 7th para., 2nd line, strike "on" and insert "to", and in the 3rd line, strike "to buy" and insert "about" Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting were laid over until the May 2nd meeting, as questions occurred regarding the motion on page 6, last paragraph. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Pheasant Oaks, Burmith, Inc., request for preliminary plat approval and rezenin g_from Rural to R1-13.5 for 96 simile family_detached homes on 55 acres (Continued Public Hearing) Director of Community Services Bob Lambert spoke to the recommendation for approval of the Pheasant Oaks proposal by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at their special meeting held Monday, April 10, 1978. Lambert further commented that the Commission on Monday, April 17, 1978, withdrew any further consideration for a pedestrian underpass. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, that the Public Hearing be closed. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 78-57, approving the preliminary plat for Pheasant Oaks. Motion carried unanimously. th1'7 Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,April 18, 1978 A. Pheasant Oaks (continued) MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-17, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for single family detached homes for Pheasant Oaks, Burmith, Inc. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to direct the City Attorney to draft a rezoning agreement incorporating the recommendations of the Planning Staff Report dated March 3, 197B, recommendations of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, and the Engineer's Staff report recommendations dated March 7, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. B. Utility and Street Inprovements, Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition and Vicini , I. C. 51-319 City Engineer Jullie outlined the proposal for utility and street improvements in the Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition at a total estimated cost for the entire project of $283,000. Jullie suggested a 17-year spread at B% interest, and explained that if improvements were ordered in, bids would be taken in June and hopefully work would be completed by October of this year. Charles Nixon, legal counsel for Condor, explained that Condor is the owner of Parcel 1310 and has a problem with the street assessments as they would receive no benefit. Jullie :::ted there is a road corridor which abutts the Condor property, and in Condor's rezoning agreement it was outlined there could be a future assessment for road purposes along 74th Street frontage. The back area of the Condor property could use 74th Street for access, so Jullie stated there is some benefit and it would be unfair only to assess the one side. George Hoff, legal counsel for Mr. & Mrs. Helle, spoke in favor of the proposed improvements and supported Jullie's comments regarding the Condor parcel. Hoff also stated it would be inequitable and unfair if Condor did not carry their share of the assessment. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 78-70, ordering utility and street improvements for Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition and Vicinity, I. C. 51-319. • Motion carried unanimously. C. Prairie East 4th, 5th and 6th Additions, request by Hustad Oevelopment for PUU approval, rezoninn of approximately 70 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5, preliminary plat approval_for approximately 200 units of single fami 1j and_ uadraminiums_ This proposal was discussed alcng with item D. D. Prairie East 7th, 8th and 9th Additions, request by Hustad Oevelopment for rezoning and approximately 50 acres from Rural to RM 6.5 and preliminary plat approval of approximately 200 units Items C. & D. were discussed together. City Manager Ulstad explained that the proponent has requested a joint hearing for these two proposals. /HY Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,April 18, 1978 C. Prairie East 4th, 5th and 6th Additions and D. Prairie East 7th, 8th and 9th Additions (continued) Jim Ostenson, Hustad Development Corporation, reviewed the history of the Prairie East PUD, and introduced Mr. Woodland of Windsor Corporation, and Rick Sathre, McCombs-Knutson, who appeared before the Council. Mr. John Woodland, President of Windsor Corporation, developer in Prairie East 4th, 7th, 8th and 9th Additions, outlined his proposals and answered questions of Council members. City Planner Enger spoke to the actions taken at the four Planning Commissions meetings where the aforementioned Prairie East Additions were considered, noting that the open space as proposed is undesirable for usable open space. Director of Community Services Lambert explained that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission did recommend approval of Prairie East 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Additions as outlined by the developer. Steve Jacobs, 9645 Squire Lane, 2nd Addition of Windsor, spoke in opposition to the proposed 7th, 8th and 9th Additions as he is against multiple dwellings next to single family homes, and also stated the park system as proposed is not adequate in the 7th Addition. Ken Franz 9830 Squire Lane, also expressed concerns with the 7th, 8th, and 9th Additions with the traffic, open space, and trailways. Rod Sundstrom, Chairman of the Planning Commission, spoke to the specifics discussed at the Planning Commission pertaining to park sites. MOTION: Osterholt waved, seconded by Meyers, to refer the Prairie 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Additions back to Staff, Planning Commission, and the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission for continued review, and directed Staff to work with the developer regarding concerns contained in the Staff memos dated March 23, 1978. Public Hearing to be continued to May 16, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS No reports. VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 78-76, granting_preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,000,000 for Super Valu MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 78-76, granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,000,000 for Super Valu. Motion carried unanimously. 1199 Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,April 18, 1978 B. Resolution No. 78-69, granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $3,200,000 for C.P.T. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 78-69, granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $3,200,000 for C.P.T. Meyers, Osterholt, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", Bye "abstained". Motion carried. C. Resolution No.78-50,_ g rariting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,100,000 for Barrett Moving & Storage Meyers questioned why the form had not been completely filled out. Marvin Ingber, legal counsel for Barrett Moving & Storage, explained it has now been filled out and is acceptable. Mr. Ingber introduced Bob Eidsvold, Chairman of the Board of Barrett Moving & Storage. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 78-50, granting preliminary approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,100,000 for Barrett Moving & Storage. Motion carried unanimously. D. Resolution No. 78-22, establishing a policy for the Cash Park Fee Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated April 14, 1978, deeds received from The Preserve and Edenvale, and the communication from T"^ °reserve dated April 18, 1978. Osterholt commended Staff for getting a difficult job accomplished. • MDTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 78-22, establishing a policy for the Cash Park Fee, deleting Hidden Ponds from the resolution. Motion carried unanimously. E. Resolution No. 78-75, accepting_deed by the City of Eden Prairie from Independent School District No. 272 for Round Lake Park City Attorney Thorfinnson spoke to his conversation with Peter Popovich, 'legal counsel for the School District, and was told an attorney in Mr. Popovich' office who drafted the deed as submitted would review the joint powers agreement and would revise the deed to be consistent with the joint powers agreement. Osterholt stated he would feel more comfortable adopting Resolution No. 78-75 after receiving a report from Mr. Popovich. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to instruct the City Attorney to accept the deed subject to bringing an action for reformation of the deed to eliminate restrictions on road development, or in the alternative to require the School District to deliver to the City a deed pursuant to the 1970 agreement and purchase of,property. Motion carried unanimously. l2/10 • Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,April 18, 1978 F. Resolution No. 78-77, authorizing the sale of certain property, Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision 335, Hennepin County MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 78-77, authorizing the sale of certain property, Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision 335, Hennepin County. Motion carried unanimously. VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Appointment of one member to the South Hennepin Human Services Council to fill an unexpired term to 1/31/79 Mayor Penzel recommended Doug Meyer to be appointed to the South Hennepin Human Services Council. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to appoint Doug Meyer to the South Hennepin Human Services Council to fill an unexpired term to 1/31/79. Motion carried unanimously. B. Report of City Attorney City Attorney Thorfinnson spoke to the settlement request from Rauenhorst to pay the amount of the bond,plus split the interest that the court found should be paid,in a total amount of $58,000. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to counter-offer in the amount of $60,00D to Rauenhorst. Motion carried unanimously. C. Report of City Manager City Manager Ulstad requested Council to set a date for consideration of the Guide Plan. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to set Thursday, April 27, 1978, 5:00 PM at the City Hall, for consideration of the Guide Plan. Motion carried unanimously. D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Tennis Courts at Flying Cloud Airport Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to memo dated March 31, 1978, and answered questions of Council members. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to work out a long-term lease with the Metropolitan Airports Commission with pro-rata payback for tennis courts at Flying Cloud Airport as per memo dated March 31, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Joint Use Agreement on Tennis Courts with School District MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to continue the item on the Joint Use Agreement on Tennis Courts with School District. Motion carried unanimously. /.20l • Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,April 18, 1978 3. Arbor Month Celebration Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to memo dated March 31, 1978, and answered questions of Council members. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to designate the "Sugar Maple" as the official tree for Eden Prairie, and that Arbor Month be celebrated in a fashion as outlined in memo dated March 31, 1978 from Stuart A. Fox, City Forester. Motion carried unanimously. E. Report of Finance Director 1. Final figures and costs incurred for bond refunding Finance Director Frane answered questions pertaining to his memo dated April 14, 1978. VIII. NEW BUSINESS Mayor Fenzel spoke to communication from Executive Director Glumack of M.A.C. in response to our letter to Chairman 8efera. Penzel recommended to propose to M.A.C. the establishment of a City Advisory Committee. The committee would be responsible for airport matters and to the City Council and M.A.C. The committee as proposed would consist of seven members to be appointed by the City Council: 3 airport businessmen. 3 citizens, and a chairman. Staff would be supplied comparable to other City comissions. All Council members concurred with this recommendation. Penzel requested staff to draft a letter to Mr. Glumack advising him of the Council's action. ! IX. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to adjourn the Council meeting at 11:22 PM. Motion carried unanimously. i SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY, APRIL 27, 197B 5:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, Dave 0sterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad, Planning Director Chris Enger, City Engineer Carl Jullie, and Director of Community Services Bob Lambert The meeting was called to order at 5:00 PM by Mayor Penzel. Roll Call was taken: All Council members present. Chapter 5 of the Guide Plan was reviewed up to the section on Housing. Suggested changes were discussed and the Council requested Staff to provide additional recommendations for Council consideration at their next Special Guide Plan meeting. Meeting stood adjourned at 9:30 PM. MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION approved Monday, April 24, I978 7:30 PM, City Hall COMMISSION_P_RESE_N_T. Chairman Sundstrom, Liz Retterath, John McCulloch, Matthew Levitt COMMISSION ABSENT: Bearman , Lynch, Redpath STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger Planning Director, Jean Johnson Planning Assistant Sundstrom called the meeting to order at 7:55 PM I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA McCulloch moved, Levitt seconded,to approve the agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES DF THE APRIL 10, 1978 MEETING Retterath moved, Levitt seconded, to approve the minutes as submitted. • Motion carried 3:0:I with McCulloch abstaining. III. MEMBERS REPORTS A. Chairman 1. Sundstrom reported he attended the Council Meeting of April 18 where at the Council referred the Prairie East Additions back to the Planning Commission. B. CLne,-,.-none IV. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Prairie East 4th & 6th Additions, request by Hustad's for rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 and preliminary plat approval for 74 lots and 52 lots respectively. A continued public hearing. Sundstrom suggested since no communication has been received from the proponents that the Commission continue the 4th &6th Additions to May 8th when all the Prairie East Additions will be before the Commission as a public hearing. Motion: McCulloch moved, Retterath seconded, to continue the 4th &6th Additions to the May 8th meeting. Motion carried unanimously. B. Hillsborough & Hillsborough Second, request by The Preserve for PUD approval for single family, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and preliminary plat approval for 149 lots. The sites are located South of Co. Rd. 1, and west and east of Homeward Hills Road. A public hearing. The Planner reported a revised plat was presented to the Council, and the Council referred the revised plat to the Commission for review. He added the item will • be back to the City Council on May 16th. The Planner informed the Commission Hillsborough First meets all requirements of the ordinance and has a density of 1.65 units/acre; Hillsborough Second has been revised from 115 lots down to 112 lots, 31 % of the lots are below 13,500 square feet instead of 54%, and the staff is recommending lot size and setback variances based upon the open space dedication. Mr. Hess, The Preserve, outlined the realigned access to Homeward Hills Road and identified the lots in the Second Addition which are below 13,500 square feet in size t`Oil/ a Unapproved Planning Commission -2- April 24, 1978 Levitt inquired if the proponents are receiving a reduced cash park fee for the open space dedication. The Planner replied the open space dedication is the trade-off for density,and full cash park fee will be required of both additions. Levitt asked what types of house5are anticipated. Mr. Hess replied they would be similar to Garrison Forest. Sundstrom asked what plans the proponent's had for outlot A had it not been given as open space. Mr. Hess replied it may have been proposed as townhouses. Sundstrom inquired how close houses would he to the NSP easement. Mr. Hess responded all building pads can and must be located outside of the 125 foot easement. Levitt asked if the variances are necessary for the Second Addition being the lots are quite large. Mr. Hess stated the variances are requested to allow flexibility in locating houses and to accommodate larger house designs. Sundstrom asked if the proponent agrees with the staff report. Mr. Hess replied affirmative. • Sundstrom asked if anyone in the audience had questions or comments. None were raised. Motion 1: Levitt moved, Retterath seconded, to close the public hearing on Hillsborough and Hillsborough Second. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 2: isborough:Levitt moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for Hillsborough First according to the staff report dated April 19, 1978, and Jan. 18, 1978; and contingent upon the plan submitted and dated April 12, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 3: Levitt moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat dated April 12, 1978 contingent upon the staff reports of April 19, 1978 and Jan. 18, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. lsborough Motion 4: econd Levitt moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the PUP for Hillsborough Second which would allow density tradeoff for an overall gross density of 1.87 u /acre to a net density of 2.10u/a with lot size and sideyard setback and frontage variances. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 5: Levitt moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with lot size, sideyard setback and frontage variances based upon the staff reports of April 19 & Jan. 18, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. Motio- n 6: Levitt moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat dated April 13, 1978 contingent upon staff report recommendations of Jan.18 and April 19, 1978. Motioncarried unanimously. // lads • STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission • FROM: Chris Enger, Planning Director DATE: April 19, 1978 • APPLICANT: The Preserve PROJECT: Hillsborough & Hillsborough Second LOCATION: South of Co. Rd. 1 and occurring on either side of homeward Hills Road REQUEST: PUD approval for single family & Open Space Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 • Preliminary plat approval for 33 lots in Hillsborough) on gross total area of 19.99 acres ( 1.65u/acre) ; and - Itilisborouglr Secon:+: 112 lots on gross area of 60.02 acres (1.81u/a) with variances requested fr0m minim;;:- lot size, minimum lot width, and setbacks REFER T0: Staff report dated March 2, 1978 RACKGR NU [loth of there additions were previously reviewed by the Planning Commission at the P1,:rch meetings, and a motion to approve the PUD concept did not pe.ss ( 3: 3 1. No additional motions were made. The City Council held a public hearing on April 4th at which time a rough revised proposal was presented by The Preserve which illustrated less lots than the plat reviewed by the Gomission. The City Council, at the April 4th meeting, referred both additions back to the Planning Commission for further consideration and continued their public hearing on the items to Pay 16th. Therefore, these tee additions were again published for a public hearing before the Planning Commission. Staff Report-Hillsborough -2- April 19, 1978 PRESENT REQUEST Hillsborough First : The Hillsborough plat has been revised to meet the requirements outlined in Ord. 135 for R1-13.5 zoning . All lots are in excessof 13,500 square feet, the overall density is 1.65 units/acre, and the majority of • the lot frontages are 90 feet or more. The lots which do not meet the 90 foot frontage requirement all have at least 90 feet of width at the 30 foot building setback line. When Hillsborough was reviewed the the PRNR Commission, the recommendation • by the Park & Recreation Staff , according to the Purgatory Creek Study, recommended no variances be granted within the Transition Zone. • The Planning Staff would concur with this and reco miends that no sideyard setback variances be given. • • • The Platting of Hillsborough is very similar to the original submission and the comments made in the March 2, 1978 staff report regarding soils, drainage, and vegetation still apply. • Therefore, the Planning Staff would recommend the Planning Commission take the following actions on Hillsborough Addition: • • 1. Since Hillsborough Addition conforms with the requirements of Zoning Ordinance District R1-13.5, the PUD designation • is not necessary for this addition. The 1968 Guide Plan • depicts this area as single family residential. • 2. Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 according to the Plan dated • April 12, 1978, with the following stipulations: • a. that a detailed storm sewer and grading plan be submitted • to the Riley/Purgatory Creek Watershed District for approval • prior to issuance of a grading permit. b. that the 3.64 acres of land including and immediately • adjacent to Purgatory Creek, shown as outlot A, Hillsborough • Addition plat, shall be dedicated to the City of Eden Prairie • • as part of the main Preserve PUD open space requirement. c. that the cash park fee of $275/unit be assessed according to Ord. 332 , payable at time of building permit. • d. that all lots must be at least 90 feet in width at the 30 foot setback line. • e. that a 50 foot setback from Homeward Hills Road be adhered to in all cases. f. that a 5 foot concrete sidewalk be constructed by the developer in the City ROW according to Engineering standards along Homeward Hills Road from the south property boundary to the north property boundary at time of street and ,Orel Staff Report-Hillsborough & Hillsborough -3- April 19, 1978 Second • g. that no variances be granted from sideyard setback requirements. h. that R01( along Homeward Hills Road be dedicated to obtain a total width of t' fee 3. Recommend to t e uil.y Council approval of the Hillsborough preliminary plat dated April 13, 1978 contingent upon the recommendations listed for rezoning. HILLSIBOROUGH SECOND • • The Hillsborough Second revised plat is similar to the previous submission as well as its drainage and grading. The original submission was for • 115 lots, the revised plat contains 112 lots. The original plat had 62 lots which were less than 13,500 square feet in size, the revised plat has 29 lots under the 13,500 square foot size minimum, with 83 lots at or • • above 13,500 . All of these miller lots , ranging from 9,400-13,500 square feet occur in the northern-central-upper portion of the plat. Twenty-five percent of the lots are under 13,500 square feet in size • compared to 54r: in the original plat. • • The overall density for Hillsborough Second Addition is 1.87 units/acre, however subtracting outlot A (6.73 acres) and computing the net density • gives a net density of 2.1 units/acre. Therefore, The Preserve is requesting PUD development in order to accomplish the density I.ransfer. The current proposal illustrates an efficient means of utilizing a diffi- cult site. • Outlot A is a lower area in the direct fly-out pattern of Flying Cloud Airport. The larger lots occurring just north of Outlot A are platted long and thin in order to preserve much of the hill form. Additional density is then made-up in the northern part of the site close to Co.Rd. 1. The staff previously recommended approval of the Hillsborough Second concept. However, there are other means of preserving the landforms • which may not be economically feasible on this site because of the • many detrimental constraints affecting it. One alternate would be larger 1/2 acre lots over the entire site. These larger lots would allow preservation of the landforms , but may not be desirable enough to command the required sale price. A second means would be to further extrapolate the principle of densities and cluster all the units in the higher portion of the site , such as townhouses, as Hill Creek • lying southeast of this site. A third means would be to meet ordinance requirements of 13,500 square foot minimum. This third means would require considerably more grading than the proposed platting. • Staff Report-Hillsborough & Hillsborough -4- April 19, 1978 Second Therefore, the Plannirr Conunission may wish to take the following actions on Hillsborough Second: • 1. Approve the PUD Concept of single family residential allowing sideyard setbacks variances and lot size variances as depicted on the plat dated April 13, 1978. 2. Reconnnend to the City Council rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for approximately 112 lots on 53.3 acres of land according to the restrictions listed under preliminary plat approval. 3. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat dated April 13, 1978 contingent upon the following: a. the plan must be developed in accordance with the plat 'a*ed April 14, 1978. b. that a detailed drainage and storm sewer plan be submitted to and approved by the Riley/Purgatory Watershed District prior to grading permit issuance. c. that a five foot wide concrete sidewalk be installed in the ROW of Homeward Hills Road on the west side of the road according to City Engineering Department standards at the time of utility and street construction. d. that a 50 foot setback he adhered to from Co.Rd. 1 and Homeward Hills Road. e. that 0utlot A , as depicted on the April 13, 1978 plat he dedicated to the city as part of the PUD density tradeoff request. f. cash park fee of $275/unit be paid at time of building permit issuance. g. that ROW he dedicated, 50 feet from centerline, for Co.Rd. 1; and additional POW on Homeward (tills for a total of 40 feet in width from centerline of Homeward Hills Road. h. sideyard setback variances as follows be granted: 5 foot garage to side lot line 10 foot 1-1': story house to side lot line 15 foot 2 story house to side lot line 30 foot front of building to front lot line, except 25' on cul-de-sacs 20 foot rear of house to rear lot line i2v°i • • STAFF REPORT • TO: Planning Commission FROM: James li. Jensen, Planning Assi stant TIIROUGi1: Chris Luger, Planning Director DATE: March 2, 1978 APPLICANT: THE PRESERVE PROJECT: Hillsborough 6 Hillsborough Second LOCATION: Both additions are south of County Road #1 and have frontage on Homeward Ili lls Road. • The first addition is a 20 acre site cast of Homeward Ili 1Is Road and south of Mill Creek Townhouses. The Second Addition :s a 60 acre parcel west of Homeward Hi.1Is and South of #1. REQI1EST: Zoning District. change from Rural to RI-13.5 • Preliminary Plat approval for 149 single family • lots on E0 acres. IIACI:GROUND: • • • Both the 196E Guide PI;:r 8thepreliminary indication on the current Guide • Plan Update. agree in land use with this proposal, showing both as single family rc;tlential. Purgatcry Creel: horde is the first addition on the south and cast and Mill Creek 'I'osnhomes are di red Iy north. The Second Addition has a 12S foot NSF powerline easement running parallel to and adjacent to Homeward Ilills Road. A 66 foot sewer easement affects the eastern portion of the site. LOCATION MAP CT I • NI; Siuutj:broi;ls Rost'i ! �# r- ! -� 4 .,.�' ..��: �� ,$,-11' tit ; ,I a• Io 1 .1!....1• ' j7bi q :v 1'•ai ri(`, n .1_c u}'.•I : •�.errlp 7 Ni‘ 7 .1'�• 1 boron,i� . _ Iru !!! n r ' (h co 1:7 ' Itl•21 1 1 e" '1 j 1210 l a Staff Report-Hillsborough f, llillsborouth Second March 2, 1978 page 2 • ZONING REQUEST The proponent is requesting rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 with lot size and setback variances. The following setback variances arc requested: 5 foot setback to nearest garage wall without living space over or behind 10 foot setback to nearest main house will 11i story. 1S foot setback to nearest main house will 2 story Setback provisions of Ord. 135 for R1-13.5 District arc as follows: 30 foot front yard setback 10-25 foot side yard setback; one side, both sides 20 foot rear yard setback 13,500 square fool lot size minimum maximum density of 2 units/ acre. • Lot sizes in the plats van' from 10.000 square feet to 52,200 in the Second Addition; and 10,800 square feet to 40,125 square feet in the First Addition. Lot size average is 16,691 square feet in the Second Addition, and 17,336 square feet in the First Addition. The maximum density of 2 units/acre is not exceeded by the proponent, it is 1.86 units/acre. ACCESS, CIRCULATION The First Addition has one internal dead-end road with 4 cul-de-sacs serving the 31 lots. Access is from Homeward Hills Road. The Second Addition takes one access from Co.Rd. 1 and 2 from Homeward Hills Road. A dead-end road abuts the west border of the proposed second addition and will connect to future dovelopmciit of the property to the east. Upon completion of the projects it is estimated that 1260 ,AOT will be generated. Homeward IHIls Road, preliminary indication of a collector on the Guide flan Update, and County Itoad 1, shown as a minor arterial , will carry these trips. Homeward Bills Road will provide a major connection to Schooner Boulevard and the Major Center Area, and US 169/212 to the south. The staff has requested the proponent to dedicate additional ROW on Homeward Hills Road from the 66 feet shown to.80 feet, the standard for a future collector road. l'here are no lots fronting on Homeward Hills (toad or Cu.Rd. 1. The proposed plan has, shown one roadway area with slopes of up to 101,. The City '1 Engineer has determined that 7'.",. should he the maximum wherever possible. The proponent has been requested by the staff to decrease this gradient to the standard. Lin Staff Report-Hillsborough tc Hillsborough Second March 2, 1978 page 3 SOILS, TOPOGRAPIIV, GRADING: The Second Addition topography is characterized by a knoll in the north- central and central portions of the site, dropping off gently to the east and west. The site drops off about 90 feet very sharply to the south. Lots that arc platted on t he steep slopes are narrow and long to help in the preservation of the grades. The First Addition has two high areas in the east and west center of the site and drops off in all directions from them . Purgatory Creek runs on the east and south borders of the site where the gradients increase significantly. The grading is shown to he quito significant on the two sites. The Second Addition has cuts of up to 20 feet on the highest point of the site, the fill being utilized primarily on the lower,southern area. A 15 to 25 foot grade will separate the most southern houses from the area to he dedicated, Out lot A. Significant amount:. of grading wi 11 also take place on the First Addition, generally leveling the upper port ions of the site and filling in the lower areas on the perimeter. Maximum cuts on the site will he about 16 feet, with the maxir.ana fills of about. 8 feet. Finished grades are shown to not exceed 2:1 ( ' vertical foot to 2 horizontal feet). The soi on the sites are primarily made up of the soil series Saida, listervi1le, Dickman, and Hubbard with vats11er areas of Kennebec, Biscay and peat soils. The latter group of soils arc concentrated on the southern port ion of the Second Addition and are less desirable for this development. The soils which occupy the largest part of the sites arc good soils fur residential development. These soils have a sandy loam • texture and have a good hearing capacity and shear strength. Changes in volume with changes in aoisttire current is\cry low and presents no problem. However, erosion occurs quite easily when vegetation is removed,so erosion control measures must be taken to prevent this. The poorer soils on the site, Kennebec and Iliscay will be filled upon. These soil:: have a high hazard of frost heave, but because they :ire underlain by soul, they have a fair to good bearing capacity. SOI I. MAP Percolation rates are slow in the upper ` 1 1 soil hurl_ors but are rood as you get , �� „\� )• into the underlying lagers. These sot is ` .��� r t; t, S/ 1 • , t <� are wet unto t of the year. The area of "' /tt ft.`t f . peat soil. is proposed as dedication to 1 r� ) n tgtw9.t "r/; n the City. • \� l • V.t ;• ate l )j \t ' ITT • Staff Report-Hillsborough t Hillsborough Second March 2, 1978 page 4 Vegetation on the site consists primarily of upland meadow grass species with very few trees interspersed. Any elm trees marked for Dutch Elm Disease should be removed prior to April 15, 1978. OPEN SPACE, TRAILS In the First Addition, the dedicated land corresponds roughly to the floodplain of Purgatory Creek. The Conservancy Area, as represented in the Purgatory Creek Study of 1974, will not contain any building pads. Conservancy Area is defined as the area needed to provide adequate protection for the resources associated with the creek corridor. The land dedication proposed for the Second Addition • is outlot A, a low , wet area on the southern reaches of the property. A trail should he constructed along Homeward Hills Road in the traditional sense of a sidewalk. It should be 5 feet wide, constructed of concrete, and be placed in the road right--of-way on the west sideof the roadway surface. A major trail along Co. Rd. 1 will be constructed in the future and will connect to the Homeward Hills Trail. . RECOMMENDAliONS The Planning Staff recommends approval of the requests as follows: 1). Rezoning, ;rom Mural to R1-13.5 with lot size and density variances as listed in the report dated March 2, 1978. 2). 1'relimin:n•y plat approval based upon the following conditions: a. grading and filling should occur in a sensitive manner, disturbing only the areas of the site directly affected. Temporary erosion control measures should be used during construction, per Riley/ Purgatory Creek Watershed District. recommendations to insure soil loss is kept to a minimum. b. permanent erosion control measures and sedimentation ponds should he implemented to help assure the continued integrity of the creek corridor. All storm sewer outlet areas should be associated with sedimentation devices. All drainage and erosion control plans shall he implemented according to Riley/Purgatory Creek Watershed District recommendations. Ground cover should be established immediately upon completion of grading, especially on any slopes greater than 40. c. a trail be constructed m the west side of Homeward IliIIs Road in the right of way from ;'o.Rd. 1 south to the southern property line. The trail should be S feet wide and constructed with concrete in the traditional sense of a sidewalk. d. that cash park fee of $275/unit as per Ordinance 332 he paid. e. restrictive cacenants precluding any building within the Conservancy Zone of Purgatory Creek. f. a road should be stubbed omit to the west property line to provide a through :oimtection to future development to the west. 1213 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HILLSDOROUGH SECOND ADDITION owes VIC AttirRVC A'R j— '— -- - ...,. /1!O IA'LD A ` 1 �•'nAP• COUN-� � A •,~ •• J MJ.t.t,'PtAlll[. Sr • ----� -• ��_- — 'T ftlete .\--•:-.. —ji7-1 —cm: i ,, , :. ,s, ..I. , ... • A , : , , T.j:YI'.FD Z/I /7C It\_� f• 0I - 1� (✓ I Gl.fe. • r { )W.lY IL rn� JIILf:I ' •1 l.1. In r . I -�_ ,IV l'_ .) \�L. ' tom. "i �I '—_ __ _�._ _ w K I � { JI ro I `I • C n[1 I • I` ',. •T rl.. /.,' , Y e • I l' L r , I 01 ) • _ I 1 i I • ' •re,r.t INIA inn.A:rrs I U ' - - ARf4/+I1017 :J:' f(!.5 - - •. • ` 'I � 1 — Dvf07 A (77 All:7 ^ , . T � .IRPArr A/JA.IJi ArS : _—_'V )1 . • „.. r I �03Yoo P.m.- SS I...) n 1. I. 1 MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Unapproved Monday, May 8, 1978 7:30 PM City Hall COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sundstrom , Retterath, Redpath , Bearman , Levitt , Lynch COMMISSION ABSENT: McCulloch STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger, Planning Oirector; Jean Johnson , Planning Assistant I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to approve the agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES_OF THE APRIL 24, 1978 MEETING P.8,VII.,1 , 2nd should read - The Planner replied the staff is recommending more traditional sidewalks due to the lack of homeowner's associations . Retterath moved, Levitt seconded, to approve the minutes as submitted and corrected. Motion carried 3:0:3 (Lynch, 8earman & Redpath abstained). IIIMEMBFRS REPORTS A, Chairman-none 8. Others-none IV. REPORTS AND RI(SO,^1;NDATiONS A. Prairie East. 41h,5th & Gth Additions, request by Hustads for PUD approval, rezoning from Rural to IDI 6.5 and R1-13.5, and preliminary plat approval. A publ ic hearing. B. Prairie East7th,8th &9th Additions, request by Hustads for PUD Approval, • PUD Development approval, rezoning from Rural to RN 6.5, and preliminary plat approval. A public hearing. The Planner informed the Commission the staff and proponent have resolved a number of issues relating to density and park locations. He outlined the revised • park locations of : 8.3 acre mini -park NE of 5th Addition, and a 4 acre park south of the 7th Addition to he maintained and owned by the homeowner's association. lie stated the staff is recommending approval of a six proposed additions contingent upon the staff report of May 4, 1978 which includes adherence to 50 foot setback frmr Franlo Road for all lots. • Redpath asked if the H0A park include part of Finholt's property. The planner replied affirmative. Sundstrom expressed concern relative to the City's liability with the small pond within the 8 acre mini-park. The Planner stated the active portion of the park would on the West one-half of the site, not near the pond. • Sundstrom then asked for the density of the 4th Addition. Jim Ostenson, Hustads, estimated 2.2 units/acre. Sundstrnm , referring to Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Comnission Minutes of 5-1-78, inquired if Co.Rd. 1 is still planned as a minor arterial with a speed of 50 mph. The Planner replied affirmative. /215 Unapproved Minutes- Planning Commission -2- May 8, 1978 Ken Franz,9880 Squire Lane, stated he is pleased to see the park area has been enlarged; and asked if parking of cars would be allowed near the park, and when and who would improve the park. The Planner replied the developer will grade and seed the park and the staff is investigating the possibility of having about 3 parking spaces to serve the park. Tom Reese, 6600 Sally Lane, asked to see the plat for the 8th Addition. The Planner presented the plat for the 8th and outlined the two parcels which are exceptions to the originally submitted 8th Addition. Mr. Reese inquired how the 2 exceptions would gain access in the future . The Planner replied the western piece would access from Linden and the eastern piece would be provided access by the developer if needed in the future. Motion 1: Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to close the public hearings on the Prairie East 4th,5th,6th,7th,8th & 9th Additions. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 2: Redpath moved, Petterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the amended PUD Concept of Prairie East Additions according to open space plans detailed in the staff reports dated April 28, 1978 and May 4, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. • Motion 3: Redpath moved, etterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with side yard setback variances for the 4th & 6th Additions according to the plans dated 4/4/78 & 4/5/78 contingent upon the staff reports of April 28, 1978 and May 4, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 4: Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 for the Prairie East 5th,7th, 8th & 9th Additions according to the staff reports of April 28, 1978 and May 4, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 5: Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the plats of the 4th (less lots 7,8,9,10,81ock 3), 5th ( less 12 units ), and the 6th Addition contingent upon the staff report of May 4, 1978 with attached • park map. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 6: Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plats of 7th,8th &9th Additions according to staff recommendations of May 4, 1978, and the plats dated 3/14/78 , with access to be provided to the eastern parcel exception by the developer. Motion carried unanimously. C. Darkenwald Drplexes, request by Darkenwald Real Estate for rezoning from Rural to R^1 6.5 for 52 duplex lots and from Rural to R1-13.5 for 2 existing single family lots, and preliminary plat approval. The site is located west of Preserve Boulevard and South of Franlo Road. A continued public hearing. The Planner informed the Commission the Engineering Department has submitted an additional report dated May 8, 1973 as an addendum to the April 21 and May 4 reports. He stated the staff is recommending approval of the requests contingent upon storm sewer plans being submitted to the City Ennineer for approval and I)J L • 5"-//-14'• - - - (\t1.42"‹.'.:'. t's \:1/ /-- I . 1 J _ . ✓OT/Nv k's.t '.''-.'' '''- ',' � / /. � �:�,' I _ \; ---j-- y� � :--_/ �� "- per) ,`----;1...'(.1,1 y4 -j r '6 !( "11 ip 7 ,' c3' ,a' +5 ` __is :1_.1 4—. In i S ,,- , 2 • 1. (k{ j • 1 22 Lj ' r6 mil_ ',,,' f Plat dated 4/4/7II o{ / J� 2 i tl, /\� � „/( F,L,NO j � '\9 '© !:.t _ .1 faAN LOTS FP,DI 4T11 ADO17IO 1 `\ �' z 3 ,�*1. 27, 2 z3, ,s,� v�r I � It .N ^ - zt 7 ( ZAY \ cl.....i H( -A hrl '" - p Qi. -6ucA"iNu�_/ .6 DR/1 L surx'NGt•i'— C\ .. .—n _7..5' 51• • /fir.. - .--1.- \ \ ��-". C: 1. 1 ' .II I l / i I 1�/i -r �. r-- , . i I i1 — ' 4 .0 �" I .. r,-1 1.-1 ni; r--, ', .._4=.,,..,........-..„...A., . \\ .i,,„-- \ .c. \, -,',..,'r Ir-' , - ---I, . 1 All C4 _l 1 J (._ I Pia ated 4/4/78 I ._ �` , j� LDTS FROM 5TN ADD.i 1�� STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Planning Director DATE: May 4, 1978 SUBJECT: PRAIRIE EAST ADDITIONS 4TH,5TH,6TH,7TH,8TH & 9TH REFER TO: Planning Staff Report of March 23, 1978 Engineering report of March 23, 1978 • Park & Recreation Report of April 28, 1978 CURRENT STAPJS OF PROJECT The Planning Commission at their April 1Oth meeting voted to deny the 7th,8th &901 Additions on a 5:1 vote. At the samemt;ng gnthet the '5th Addition (quadra�ainiums) were recommended for approval; ee proponent's request the 4th & 6th Additio:.., .sere continued to April 24, 1978. The City Council held a public hearing on the Prairie East Additions on April 18,1978, and referred the additions to the staff to work out the plans according to Commission and staff recommendations. The Council will again hear the items on May 16th. The Planning Commission listed the following reasons for denying the 7th, 8th & 9th Additions: 1. inadequate open space for immediate additions, totally inadequate for entire additions. 2, densities requested without adequate tradeoffs. 3. park areas proposed contain too much storm water pond in relation to usable area. 4. liability problems and maintenance problems associated with public ownership of park/pond areas. 5. variances requested without sufficient need exhibited. • Prairie East 4th-9th -2- May 4, 1978 • The Recreation and Planning Staff have worked with the proponents and recommend approval of the Prairie East subdivsions 4-9 contingent upon the plats . 4th dated 4/ 4/78 5th dated 4/ 4/78 6th dated 4/ 5/78 7th dated 3/14/78 8th dated 3/14/78 9th dated 3/14/78 • and contingent upon: 1. That the mini-park adjacent, to the 7th Addition remain in private owner- ship and be designated a wildlife natural area with itaprovuncuts limited to a trail corridor through tho pork and a significant number of trees and shrubbery planted in the area for wildlife cover. 2. Developer dedicate the 8.15 acres identified adjacent to the 4ih and 5th Additions. . 3. Developer ::ode and seed the antic par!. site in accordance with the City site plan. 4. Developer pick up all assessments on the property. • 5. Developer pay the CAS!I PARK FCC. • 6. Developer will provide the City with a letter of intent that ind;cotcs that the seller :end City staff have agreed to a proposed 20 acre, park site in the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section 7o and that. the developer trill sell this property to the City of Eden Prairie at'a price to be determined by an appraiser, and that the City will pay for their purchase of this park property with CASH PARK FhliS from this neighborhood as the CASH PARE Plh S cone in (payment could be on a nralmonthly or yearly basis as to be determined by the City Council). location •r the park site should be slsoi.A on a mop attached sit„ the letter. 7. Prairie East 7, 8, &9 - Watershed District letter of April 6, 1i97 -Hennepin County recomnendations of March 27, 1978 -Engineering report of March 20, 1978 -Staff report of March 20, 1973 , items B-M -Park ; Roc report of April 28, 1978. 8. Prairie Easl. 4.5,6 -Watershed District letter of April 6, 1978 -Hennepin County letter of March 21, 1978- -Engineering report of March 23, 1918 -Planning Report of March 23, 1978 (pith density, lot size & sideyard setback variances recomnc'nded, setbacks to Franlo Road to be 50 feet. 1219 ( ____ ,,,A„,„ ,>,,, I /....____:.______I ,//L:._____________.. ,,,,____7 r______ „ . c.,,_,,..\.___.___-) . ... -� .. L,-- ::__, L . _....... . �. ./ s --------P e i ir „.,.....,„ ..f .,4, !.t, .. I\..)/-1 ..., / / C\ ,.....1 ` L / \ t . .; I (___,,--.--------"..__....""/....-.....,............j \ \ : SR_ � ) ./rI I .' ` �.� t� 77. ) .. : r--- ', :, . . 1 L „. „, L__I - -- iaav i'.inutca — Tnrlcs, Rec. and Unapproved Natural :ic::ourccs Ooreui^Dion — 2 — Bon., :,ay 1, 1978 B. Report:: of Stuff Gl;ic.cli;lc "f^ !'✓`f l' t)r :clo1__cnt rr1^=l s 1. .. Lnr:bcet stake to the four itc:as listed in his tecao of April 28, 1978 that he felt the lht tc Iit '.%o:,La:::;_on should be concerned with in de••:elop— reni. eroponala. ho c::pinined that if a develor::,cnrt t.rocoanl affects ttt of these its: e he will car cnt on it, but if none are affected, he would Idle to maize it a t'olicy to at those proi•osals on the ;ericia nedtirtlter the Planned- 5tc-f ,Zeport infor• ).c :._ition on tr,o:e ituis. '- to cede '::race of the ;tT, 1'AI'L :'i,li as untcU.2y the only action neces5 ry on those tykes of proposals. Lrucll requested the addition to the checklist of: nuabcr of unit,, :lusher of acres, reore t.iunal space recuircr:enta, asount of land ::c•r•ain;, as water store c area, effect of Grcdin,t on cc.i tiny{ '.efctoticn, end ncip1jurhoo1 scnticut. Co:.::ri asionc r n were f encra:Lly in agr.cc:zest that a chech-list trould be useful. ii; rcvicwin the develo;r:cnt proposals. i1'i.7c'... Carols roved to direct the Staf f to come bach at the next • in ei cb1r t ire r .oretrt, he four Dills as s .,. r . elc.:' ,,- ana also r, orearctin;, st Ott a 1 , ,cr,r.. . o o!' April _,, by Err,ell of: nurlhc r of acres, n uabcr of uyc its, r recreational. spaceeli' c ^r • aunt o f :Iona sc_via as rauiOf an.::, uc:aC;_r:cnt, if;.rl-d . • gr;d'in an+c::inti-nG, vef:elation, and nci, horhooc seeonccd. AMI 1Oh TO ;"CpL h: T::ncn rreucai:d addition of: Lou the ;•r•onr:e l • confor::,s with ad;iocoat uc ^):barl:ood, Garuts and rificlo aceel-tcd the • addition. ration cur:itd unaui:.eualy. • • a. T1 tiri!_st • LrcaberI ❑poke to the revised e en space cor_^.itr:ent by the 1Uu tad f Devrlor`,:cut. :statics for the Irairic at 4,5r,(,7.` s oa Jth additions, e laini.af; that the new propo• 1 would calf for an extension of 1.1:e southern riini.•a•plc site 0dj::deft to the Orrin ilro;peon gums anti ccloaf to in.Ju e :arras fat;l)y lot re;abcra • ( 5 r.na 9slat^ fuel:Ingham Strive and trou.lf include three • of 7, s of the Orrin T1:;::. n quad::, t.a:iu„ this u total of 3.].5 acrca. 1). An+:orsan and Taaf.en ca reaseil concern frith the ri i.-corkrc^,— ndjnccnt to the 'ilia ;,,l::i.tion and i:' r' tintcr.,ncc. • parcl,.d 'hat It. wotbid be owned by the 1.o:.uotflte n:::;o intiat :.rn: unintr.Ineo a; a natural are:: with n trail rminin,; throe;h it1. crnr:cut:u„ it with the Preserve.vo. i • 122,1 Pnria, ibcc. rind Unapproved • • Luturr.) Resources •jor.r.iosion 3 — :::ay 1, 1973 a. Pr:,trio hastaLlnitel r,palte to '..)er..!ia-vionts recr)rnendetion and r,eneral agreenent that rare Caller sites tuad to serve ;,:orc vveop3.e,ond err-Ives:n-(1 surprise that it 'ins boa: for ri-ealisf..:crr.t.l..vn. cfocri. v;,aintc•-.-7 e,ut trA it •.•:as not tie Staff"; rceo.r.f.nCati,r. it-t too aurvc bott(r, and s:-ol:e to rt,„ C.:ov.:Iissian. he ns:ohe to the .;: %0?.1tn COEIC;:lT ;:r!:(:(7, incriaat.3.n,r v,:cre of r•ri l'ren:-.b.!c nine :n :;.:er). cci. of rat:sable land, are, also trat • the ov.*;5.na".1 v;•::: for t.:5 :vexes ivitl, 7-t1 nerc:3 ofIvari lanC, pro-, :oros 2erC5 °ion Cri-"nec, ituch of it • unusnbile. in;n15.rcri rdvc•re tie clasest cococ ',A:11. be serving the /.th tl.rou;',h 9th • AdOitiers t'o v,.•-•.ri. cocci ro--once, L;•:;.Y0 enau:ril recreational space as it f's rr•bert res;enclif.:. that tho 3-19 acre t pnrh, the havesel.ve nnd eventral3y the nei hborboocI tarl• soeth of Co • nerve tie fcvtl o '';It. erplrince that the rini.-1,ar:: i;i1".1 not nerve theentiCe • .'rca, nof -tint it uijl be an inter:in psri. until tic. heirr,hharhood in • .1eNrclopc,.•. rolt tot the need to Hive tv.ro e,covirr.te If•ribert • ern, :et :laCC wore 3r( first, it ;tan bnel: yard that the use NI:A into ncifsi:bort; back ycri , ate; -that it rill be C.1.1.1.icell. tor..-.)litsin. • c.••:- 1•, !.. ;:q7 Lin that hic irrn ICC frvor of tic noiiviborilooe, btiCi3. leentr:i north of Ca. 1, het con:le: acc,cpt the south site if it uert ?.ore ciltnr:1; arr.' the. n::pronchce, ;,t, thin tir.i of ssfe recce.0 for the rt:,cicntn nvrtli or fo. t•.".. 1 to the arl: by -cans of ,CO ov,,r-y:Ino or ion- trriffic. toe' Lnoi vithin 25 to ft. the vi:1.71. be, ;1-.6 1:1)y.t: l i 14j In to VC; a ).otter of intent that ire...tortes tint tic seller love 5,L7ecd to a ••,-.0opoti«1 H ere !‘r,ri• site in the norticr•st ;-prirt cc of the 1:0111".0.A, t:11!'l't.tr r r.Cet.i(111 1..( tr:,31:e to aCCC pl'0111C:1 bCinr, 1.41031 0(•, :LC, holdinz; ep this devcdo:.:'nnt 011111 the rose, 1•?,,Alr. are complete. Airlersen cva0re:-.se6 Concern tint tie CO:A...Ass:ton has ;Tent a lot of tire sod ef'7ort on this I renewal vithout 11:1%i,ov any yroravess, ana' it tiara boon :A:itched real one site to another. he 1:1:3 not in fsvor of the southern site for the par); at this title, l•11. felt tn.: f.hould have n total picture of tic par): before • • tieeic)in:•: for it. larliert, Ivintoe, out tir:t. t,iti this yroponal we do inve five more !lore:: tinn ireviens3y, a n.h the 1:CI.,-,111,or!:oe.i cari site i3 pretty veil tiej (lenn throll eisenssion vay..; r.uyec.cat bet‘r,en '..stennon and that instads have tvretti to fundin!r, flavour+ toe • ;11.ti Ontonson, lInstne invelep.:nt. Corporation, apoke to t::ct boel.:rotraid of thu pre,lect siol:tv to ti.n olian;i• in the y..royasal by eel tin:, ty • /223 ••1.• . .. .,. # • : Elnuteo - Parhn, Rec. ond Unapproved Vatural Resources CoL'..Linsion - 4- Monday:I:ay 1, 1978 • a. Prairie }',...st (cent id) in half throui;h cut:An!: 553 unite to 302 units. lie spolze to the PA L 1:11 Ck):-,;--.5- 3.on :tea r3:•r•:-inii -%0:-.I'--ion rceoLudidintion to put the neighborhood park nouth of .o. :id.. I bednir:c the Thad an less c:::edsive nee eontnine6 nom enrcd:;e. lie siol.e of 1'cir aillin:nons to give the City a letter of intent eu void:lag ilith the;.. Tangen asi.ed •.:hether a :letter of intent Ylas the 1,17.r.e. an an option. Osten:ion re :I-on:it-a that Vie letter !inn given until a for:A.;!1 option can be errr.:n up by the City Atiorney i:h.cn approvals are received. ECYTICD: Cnrens :.loved il.at ,.:0 reco:ziend to the Ot,u nr:11 that ...e accent the . . Staff C!,7.,:'re:IIII;e '.'itli the dc.-vel o:ier of the rr:iir ic .i....a ot 4 thron‘,:: c)th A&itionn; that. 'Jo “CO.(''-.'.. the ;:dovnlrolcd hone:dialer assocdtton o,:ncd area ne:accnt to the 7th Additidn; id..e 2.5 :;eras :.:Ijacent to the /U and 5th Atditions for a rylni- par:; the nci:-:nberlided .i:ari: to be located out of Co. Ild. 1, nit:: non-gradc eronsin7 to he clevoloce:1 tit ti:c the the road is 17C,-./3.1.i•-r.Cej tint t:o pf'.77?. COI-I-. rei;:t of icTro::irately 20 ac-cs beat;d on tie hinnil of tl.e il ouartcr of the WI , quarter o ction ad; and iliat en oytion be tslcn before apyrovdl of this clan. Lruell :wounded. . -PI:;317ii'`,"e;;;'• 'Tan,;c.n canal ioncdi thn inc1,2.::Lon of develo-•nedit of the erassi.nr: in the ndtitin bedaunc this ;Inca nil]. net dcvdito,c.c.1 for so,:ic ti..lio, ;Ind tidulel . I:refer eat to hsvc It in the InVon. Canon;: I-eh:ended tint 5!.11CC ..:e are ,:.,in:; to rc-alli:di the 'neC, be 1:":)1.:1;1 lila- t;) ace a so,fc end:in:I.:1J; niece thclyo 'All .. ha ¶0d ndits going in the lanti; dad south, and wou:I:i 11d:c to ::cc:: it in 4,. .e riotion. •. D. Andcrndo. : mod abdtit the present alligry,.ent plans of -Frank' ::e. nr.e, •;o., enter:ion reni-dne.icel that the: .iity ‘..in;ineeri.n7. lic :-.rt.::..ent had catid to L)..11.;n the no rehd, hut he ",-..7 unsune of tic ::recent statun of -those: yldan. 1.c .-d,'..-1:e.• to the i'e el i li! that .1o. :id. C. :7hoold hem: 35 lid: road, unplai sin: that if the eieveloylicnta had access to tlic road, the City could influence 1.cin:ol in 2/..,nnty pl ans. liruell ccir,-.:::ied favor for the notion, but objeete.'. to tlx play a.!.'en in the north section because it r:alics access dit'ficult far tdo !'any pc.::le. VOW.; Thn notion carried ;.:it: a vote of 5-1-3., with I:ruell voting "nay', and Arnlerson °abet:II:lie. b. 1:on!:(rt. ;:yal:e to tic proponal, and asked lir. .'on Peterson, lidonvole, to nn:wcr cuestiona about the lath ;.lonc, the creek. • : Peterson give the leicimnoned of the Creel:nide Addition arprovcd in 1972, c.:.pl Ani/e• that it ..1. :: :0.i:...‘vo: ;:ls 1-x(7.1.m: C.e wtity, lie ergotc to the arca oinv.1 by the City on a nteep bill and to IroblAtion of any buildin:: or path on t1.1:: elope. In ti 1 .., MEMORANDUM • TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Prairie East Development • DATE: April 28, 1978 At the April 3, 1975 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission mooting Mr. Richard Putnam, Ilu:,fain Ucveiopaent Corporation, gave a presentation on the proposed Prairie East 4,5,6, 7, ;,and 9th Additions. He spoke of their proposal of two mini-park sites of 4.3 acres located in the 7th Addition and 4 acres adjacent to the 4th and 5,th Additions to be dedicated to the City and to be graded and seeded by ]lust ad Devclol,,aent Corporation. At that meeting I indicated that the staff was recommending one S acre site with the rationale that the City !should not set a precedent of acquiring mini-parks throughout. the City because of the prob)ens with maintenance of small park sites. At that meeting the Commission recotmaended the Council approve the Host ad proposal for Prairie East 4, S, 6, 7, S, and 9th Addition and to accept the two mini-park properties as proposed, act to assess the CASH PARK ELti. At a later v.eetioyo the Plaeaing Coruaiss,ion felt ,hat the park dedication v: ::Jsi ad was insufficient and rcco:ricnd.'d the developer try to meet staff recommendations. oi At the April IS Council meeting the Council objected to the proposed open space, indic- ating; that both mini-park.: were of an true.oblc site and included a good deal of unusable l:md. 'Ihcy ❑iso noted that the oririn:it Pltl) was for 95 acres and in.loded 7-8 acres of park land and tts' existing proposal included 20O acres with only 9.4 acres of open space, ntnch of it uusable. The Council directed the developer to work with the st;;ff and coma back with a reasonable proposal on open space out May 16t h. It is stafh'r. recnsssenlation That, if the neighborhood park is located south of the road that a ];n'g.e mini-pail; or stall neighborhood park be loc:itcd north of the road to serve the needs of the yotutoor children that will not he able to get down to the ncighborl•oe,l p..rt, south of Co. Road 1. This would trill providing sufficient slice for preobabiy one :.oft.hal] or little league ba]Ifield, a coaple of leunis courts, a playground area :nn1 possibly a mini-skating rink area. The staff felt that a S-10 acre site would be appropriate for this type of use. The staff has now met with the developer and has worked out a proposal that is acceptable to broth parties:. This proposal would call for an extcnstlon of the southern mint-park site adjacent to the Orrin Thompson quad:: and would extend this par}. `:itc to include ziiugic fa'eily lot nombcrs 5, 6, 7, and S along Bucking- ham Drive and weuld include three of the Orrin Thompson quads. This park site would then be expanded to S.15 acres;, . 12a, t • Prairie East -2- Arp. 23/73 The staff recommends approval of the Prairie East 4,5,6,7,C,and 9th Addition with „ the following conditions: 1. That the mini-park adjacent to the 7th Addition remain in private owner- ship and be designated a wildlife natural area with improvements limited • to a trail corridor through the park and a significant number of trees and shrubbery planted in the area for wildlife cover. 2, Developer dedicate the 3.15 acres identified adjacent to the 4th and 5th Additions. 3. Developer grade and seed the entire park site in accordance with the City site plan. 4. Developer pick up all assessments on the property. 5. Developer pay the CASH PARK Fla:. G. Developer will provide the City with a letter of intent, that indicates that the seller and City staff have agreed to a proposed 20 acre park site in the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section ?(i and that the developer will sell this property to the City of Eden Prairie at a price to be determined by en appraiser, and that the City will pay for their purchase of this park property with CAsn l' RK1'be nEs n';w thimoshly s neighborhood as the CASH PARE FEES come in (payment)',cni could • p,• ,Ss as to be determined by 'hT City Council). General..` �,rtcr. lucatinn of the park site should be show❑ on a map attached `h lL /ZVI • • MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION approved Monday, April 10, 1978 7:30 PM, City Hall COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sundstrom,Retterath, Redpath, Lynch, Bearman, — — Levitt COMMISSION ABSENT: McCulloch STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger Planning Director, Jean Johnson Planning Assistant • I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Retter•ath moved, Redpath seconded, to approve the agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. • II. MINUTES OF THE APRIL 27, 1978 MEETING P.2,B.,5P, should read - . increase the cost of the lots $1,000-2,000. P.4,B.,6P, spelling of dominant 15P, should read- . . Mr. Levitt believed the 13 building . . . • 10P, should read . . . the proponent may not have to . . . . P.5,A., Add motion- McCulloch moved, Redpath seconded, to continue the • Tamarac Woods public hearing to April 10th for a staff report. B.,2 P,should read - . . is an incorporated insurance . . . Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to approve the minutes as submitted and corrected. Motion carried unanimously. III. MLI1i6Eni PrDORTS A. Chairman Sundstrom 1. Sundstrom informed the Commission he attended the last Council meeting and submitted the Commission's motion on Hillsborough. He added the Hillsborough plat was referred hack to the Planning Commission to review the revised plat. 2. Sundstrom asked the staff to include a list of present commission/ • council members in the commission's next packet. B. Others • none • IV. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Prairie Fast 4th,5thA 6th Additions, by Hustad Development for rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 for approximately 70 acres, and prel iminary plat approval of approximately 200 units. The additions are located in the NW and NE quadrants of Co.Rd. 18 and Franlo Road. A continued public hearing. • The Chairman asked the Planner if the proponents and the City staff had reached agreements as requested at the last commission meeting. The Planner summarized changes to._the_plats_as follows: 4th Addition, corner lots fronting on Euckingham changed to meet front yard setback of 35 feet, • and setbacks from Franlo hevi'sed to 50 feet except for 3 sideyards; 5th Addition, access to Co.Rd. 1 eliminated, 1 quad eliminated and additional size added to park.; 6th Addition, Buckingham Drive access to Co.Rd. 1 eliminated; &lnts fronting on Franlo Road-some 30feet_ setbacks-some meet • - 50 foot setback. _ . Mr. Putnam replied the project will provide a variety of housing types, 2 park areas, and be subject to cash park fee. Redpath stated he appreciates having all the additions submitted at once, but the densities are in excess of tradeoffsof 'maybe' 500 acres open space on an unapproved 1,000 acre PUD. He believed it would be unsafe to grant densities now on future open space. Motion 1: Redpath moved, Bearman seconded, to close the public hearing on Prairie East 4th,5th & 6th Additions. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 2: Redpath moved, Bearman seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the PUD approval on Prairie East 4th-6th for single family and multiple without specific densities. Motion carried unanimously. Redpath moved to recommend approval of the rezoning from Rural to to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 for the Prairie East 4th,5th & 6th Additions based upon the March 23, 1978 staff report. Mr. Putnam requested the commission to continue the hearings on the 4th & 6th Additions to allow him to advise the developers on the cornnission's concerns and determine if the projects are feasible under those conditions. Motion 3: Redpath moved, Bearman seconded, to recommend to the City Council rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 for the 5th Addition based on the March 23, 1978 staff report with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation on 2 park locations. Motion carried 4:2 (Sundstrom & Levitt voted nay) • Motion 4: Redpath moved, Lynch seconded, to recommend approval of the 5th Addition preliminary plat 4-4-78 based upon the staff report of March 23, 1978 with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation on the 2 park locations. Motion carried 4:2 ( Sundstrom & Levitt voted nay) Motion 5: Lynch moved, Bearman seconded, to reopen the public hearing on Prairie East 4th & 6th Additions. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 6: Lynch moved, Bearinan seconded, to refer the 4th & 6th Additions back to the developer to redesign and continue the public hearing to April 24, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. B. Prairie East 7th,8th & 9th Additions, request by Hustad Development for rezoning of approximately 50 acres from Rural to RM 6.5 , and preliminary plat approval of approximately 200 units. The additions are located east and west of Linden Dirve, West of Co.Rd. 18, a continued public hearing. The Planner stated these additions have not been revised since the last meeting, but agreements understood are: _the loop_streets will be private, setback __ ,ariances from the streets are suggested if no units-front--onto the road(sethacks - 'would in no cases be lets than 30 feet from hack.of curb, and 50 foot setback from requested Co.Rd. 1A MOW is proposed. Redpath asked if the townhouse association would have any park maintenance. Mr. Woodland , Windsor,, stated they do not wish to bear the liability of the park . /.2?X approved Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 10, 1978 The Manner informed the Commission the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recomnended approval of the two mini- parks as proposed by the proponent, but thePlanning and Park & Recreation Department staffs still reconmend one larger usable park for public ownership and maintenance, otherwise, the smaller two play areas should be owned and maintained by a homeowner association. He then referred the Commission to the letters received from Hennepin County Highway Department dated March 21st regarding the 5th & 6th Additions. • Mr. Putnam, Hustads, concurred with the planner's summary of resolutions made. He stated they talked with residents and believe they have met the concerns of the residents. Bearnan inquired if the Engineering Department has reviewed the two mini-parks and if they consider the area to be parkland or storm water ponds. The Planner responded of the 4.3 acre park proposed in the 4th Addition, approximately 1/3 of it is pond with remainder in some backyards. He stated Hustad's engineer believes the pond can be confined to the southeast part of the area , but it will be deep, about 4-6 feet. Bea man expressed concern over the City's liability of ownership arid maintenance of the totlots containing deep water ponds that may vary from 2-5 feet after heavy rains. Redpath inquired how many acres are within the park proposed near the 5th Addition. Mr. Putnam estimated the size of the area to be 5.3 acres and stated they believe it is large enough for softball and Hustads will sod the area. Don McGlyn, Olympic Hills Corporation, stated the Golf Club held a meeting today and voted to go on record in opposition to the lot size and setback variances being requested. He stated the Olympic Hllls 3rd & 4th Additions had to meet ordinance requirements at the request of the City. Mr. Putnam, Hustads, informed the Commission, the Bluffs 1,000 acre area will include possibly 500 acres of public/private open space. Redpath inquired if the proponent bases variance requests on ' possible ',not committed open space. Putnam replied they will commit to open space whether it is purchased through agencies or through City cash park fee funds, and if • some areas are unpurchasable, then they may he developed. Levitt stated that the possible 500 acres open space is not before the Planning Commission, there is not an over ailPUD for the 1,000 acres, therefore what tradeoffs are proposed for the variances requested. j IA2(;) approved Planning Commission Minutes -4- April 10, 1978 • Mr. Moore,10081 Laurel Drive, supported the park plan proposed by the developers. Levitt asked if the proponent will meet the requirements of turn lanes, etc., of Hennepin County Highway Department. Mr. Putnam stated they will do what is required. Redpath expressed concern that the sight distance of the entrance road and Co. Rd. 18 is bad. Sundstrom expressed concern that the open space/pond/recreation area proposed is inadequate for the densities proposed. Bearman expressed concern that the park area proposed is inadequate and carries liability and maintenance problems. Redpath asked if the trail behind the 7th Addition, going to The Preserve. would be maintained by the townhouse association. The Planner replied if it is accepted as public open space, it would be City responsibility, but he is unsure how the City would maintain it. ., • Redpath expressed concern on the additions and their corresponding _ densities without adequate park or open space commitments. Levitt did not believe the proponent is proposing sufficient tradeoffs for the densities requested. Lynch expressed concern about the variances requested. Motion 1: • • • Redpath r:cveu, r',ea neap seconded, to close the public hearing on the 7th,8th and 9th Additions. Motion carried unaaimou'sly. Motion 2: Redpath moved, Rearman seconded, to recommend to the City Council reaffirmation of the multiple concept use forthe 7th,8th & 9th Additions. Motion carried 5:1 with Levitt voting nay. Motion 3: Redpath moved, Beaman seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural to RN 6.5 based on the March 20, 1978 staff report, • the March 27,1978 letter from Hennepin County, and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation on park/open space. Motion failed 1:5 with Redpath voting aye. Motion 4: Levitt moved, Bearman seconded, to recommend to the City Council denial of Prairie East 7th,8th & 9th Additions based upon the following: 1. inadequate open space for immediate additions, totally inadequate for entire additions. 2. densities requested without adequate tradeoffs, 3. park areas proposed contain too much storm water pond in relation to usable 4. liability problems and maintenance problems associated area with public ownership of park/pond areas, 5. variances requested without sufficient need exhibited. Motion carried 5:1 with Redpath voting nay. 030 --c•ation and aproved o 7.f.sc,•. 3 - t:5ton - 6 - l'onday, A:ril 3, 1978 C. 2.112s.r Value (Cont'd) felt 1' i. U r . CO because of recent Staff chance-avers, :,nd spoke to or---oing ,t of jests and lack of meetini.,. R0.1.- GALL ,o,-ried 4-3. R..inek-n-son - "aye" - "nay" - "aye" 1ou3fl - "ray" nar..als - "aye" D.!.!.:coson Fifleld - "aye" !,,•.CTIOn Hotico to hold n secial sleeting to love 3o . 7al_un oft to where the trail • !.1:1 7) and to sp,ak to other points re-j.cotie. by Ecoeji. 1-i;tion tied for the look of a second. lart:on r.eved IL. r rcoar.;:end. to he Council Rot in ray by 3200 cralne, c cetio of -Ft fore trail esse: ent alona. Co. d. ."-!2 be incl-c7cd in the rc-seninz aL;rec .,nt. P. Ant-croon ,oith Lruell tee dloaentirp; vctc. 8, and.2 1.1r, ictitlotnar., litatad 1.!c.velopl-aent Cerporation, spokc brielly to three roe: Aelditions ascady api:.roved and un.d.cx resaInt:t, Additions. lie soeke further to their propoa::1. of too ar 4.3 acres located in the 7th Aci,dittyn end 4 scms • 4.-th and 5th ACditions to be dedicated to the 'ilty, totto be •rd by I:ir-;tad C.:orp.„ Ye acted t2rt they hove s.et, oft t rts, and this is v.,Let they t:ant. tkc .: )dat•ten of one tiLhi to ten acre -:.e.rk site, l'utrn,: ca:-p,3ainc,2 that they -tore units, :-::!1•5117 it econorically u:f'r.aihiu for the ho the 5taff reco:-:-.endatinn of one site, 1,e ea.poct the City to lsaintain toy 7-rks 11 cut the G11; 1,-atu---.o of the types of r:-.ahincry ye not: hr.ve of tavc to bt vent on the read E;C:tt.tnt to td-..c,-o, sitt7. !:e felt tiny ova nd staint,%ined by• horoovncrs -..ns 1n fat-or of five acre parks because they ,Noll:L to snints1n end they -,.011e, Lave exposure to IC-ore poc,pla. ;anger) inquirA 'tic-titer these to rini parks v:11.11 t the U ft 0 If oft' present ir,rit a larL;cr park site to be r t,1!• I'trio yt red a..f'ir:•.otive. P. AnOci•son the cost of a larLer in the aortlesst enadrant In co0, atri.:.;: 1 to I he soul,Lcrfl cite, i, if to did not Lave • to purchase n rite it this and the rirl ;1.-3 vow., be --tuff;aient, tLe City ! cc option red pay for it 1.1-won!)-1 the a it lark fce p:-.y-s!ents • • • •• • }antes - Parks, Recreation approved and I:atural Resources Commission - 7 - • Monday, April 3, 1978 b. Prairie Enst 4. 5. 6. 7, 8, and 9 (cont'd) MOTION: Tangen moved to recommend to the Council that the Punted proposal for Prairie East 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 be accepted with the two mini park properties developed as proposed, and cash park fee be assessed. Johnson seconded. DISCPSSION D. Anderson asked what the tine frame was for a decision on the parkland to the south of Co. 3d. 1. Putnam responded that it was to I:ustad's advantage, as well as to the City's, to agree on this and that they would be receptive to signing an option as recor_:ended. VOTE: ]•motion carried unanimously. l'OTIC2: gruell Loved to direct the Staff to bring the south park site in the Frni.ric at area back to the Ccia:ission by June 1st for review. D. Anderson seconded, motion carried unanimously. l;OTICN: Pruell moved to continue the balance of the Agenda to regularly 5ch;dulcd meeting or next special meeting. Tangen seconded, motion carried • Lnanirausly. c. Eiiis'.,. g_'' 1st_:nd 2nd .addition= Continued. d. Raven ._;;ice*e Continued. e. Fhc4,5e.nt Onks Continued. • 5. J ig'_ U c A-Tce'Icnt en Tennis Courts with School District Deleted. 6. Stnttus of Irrl:. Construction for 1978 Continued. 7. Tennis :_L^t Froro_-_1 for ilvine Cloud Deleted. 8. Cash Flow ;?,nc_1/_ASppPARE FEE Continued. 9. Eden Prairie Stahle Continued, VI. & VII. Continued. "TII. ADJCU4::1 NT I`ii iON:Tangen moved to adjourn at 11:35 FM, seconded by Johnson. };ot.car. unanimously. Respectfully submitted by Donna Stanley, Recording Secretary /?,2. / MEMO TO: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning • DATE: May 3, 1978 SUBJECT: Bachman Anderson Proposal On Monday, May 1, Bob Lambert and I met with Geneva Middleton and Frank Hartman (President of Anderson Lakes Homeowners Association) on the Bachman/Anderson site on the north shore of Anderson Lakes. The purpose of this meeting was to clarify the proposal for these people and their • interested constituants. It was my understanding that there was to be a H.O.A. meeting Tuesday night, May 2, at which time these representatives will be able to more fully explain the project to their neighbors. The three main concerns voiced during yesterday's on site meeting were as follows: 1. Impact of the project on the lake during construction. (The plan has been approved by the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District. The construction part of the site will drain away from the lake.) 2. Visual impact of the project upon Anderson Lakes Park and the residents to ti" east. (The buildings will he built into the hill and will he two stories high across the north side and terracing between 2 and 4 stories across the south side. Less than half of the site is being touched and less j, than lO% covered with buildings, our ordinance allows 30% coverage. The 1 buildings will be below the height of the tree line on the top of the hill, and major trees will be preserved to give the building 'scale'. The parking will be handled in a deck for phase construction.) 3. Impact of traffic on West 78th Street. (As you know, after meeting with Bloomington, Hennepin County, and MNDot, we are waiting for a reply from the State on a suggestion to continue West 78th Street straight east o County Road 18, merging with the off ramp and connecting in with the 1 existing signal. Along with this there would be a prohibited left turn at existing West 78th and County Road 18.) #. CE:md i• /:333 • I:inutes - Parks, Rec. and Approved • Natural Resources Commission - 2 - Monday, April 17, 1978 • 1. Shorelend Lanaeement Act (contrd) Lambert responded that as a Staff person, he would not be in favor of asking for that re-classification without Council approval. lie suggested the Co:e:,ission make the request and submit it to the Council and Commissions for aLproval. :erts added that if the City adopted the Ordinance with the lakes et their present classification it would becon.e official, making it more difficult to re-classif;• after Ordinance has been approved. hrucll quentioncd the variance request provisions of the Crcinar:ce, ccr_.ent- ine that he felt these rrovisions were inconsistent because these variances are yen itted after the rules are set. Anderson eel-Mined that this leaves the control to the local goverment, rather than Lavine it spelled out reecifically. 1-1:TI(I1: l:rucli moved to table the Shoreland F ragcNent Crdinonce item for cencidera ion at a special rioting or continue to the I:ay ]st meeting. • Tangen seconded, :Notion carried unanimously. • 2. joint _ster Pl n-Anderson I ekes • k'.C'TICih: Ten-c a moved to table the Joint ::aster Plan-Anderson Lakes item. The teotion died for a lack of a second. • lirue]1 eeked hod •.ndercon Lakes Park ties in with. the Bloemieeton }ark: cystcr:. le...bert ream oncied that the }roposal for funcine of the parks was beset _.. tie premise that it would 'Lae a joint perk oyster.., with .. all trail connecting. liruell added the Jo.r'_rsicn, the Council, end the coe:aunity to clue etien whether turnip- over the operation and land. to the Leneepin County Perk 3cserve is a wise lore term decision, in view of the recurrin_,o political sauabblcs of the • }memo;in Jouety Board. Lambert winter', out that this is cnc of the e.a jor items • to be detrreined. Several other Cor_issioners observed that this method is one • way to obt•in Lot:.,.te development because Eden Prairie does net ncC• have the funds for i ::rove:..ant. • Lr. .firs C_bcrr,, 9550 Timber Trail, expressed concern with plans for Co. 3d. 18 to be eedo into a four lone freeway, with a high volur.e of 40,000 cars going to sou;h, end the it act it weeld have on the Anderson Lei:es Perk. he re-tested tint this road he considered in the Jo::.ission ;lens. Anderson re‘cleinte that the Commission sub-con_ittee hes net and is on • record as opposing this clan for Co. Rd. IS, and this will be a • point of discussion before we turn over any land to the County. • • hdTIC:a Tcnren roved to table the Joint ]aster Plan-Anderson Lakes. 4(........ D. Anderson seconded, motion carried unanimously. • V.9.1.a. Rachman Anderson I`s. Doug Baird, representing Bach:nen Anderson, showed slides of the existing land end explained the steps of the process they followed. l:inutes - Parks, Rec. and approved Natural Resources Counission - 3 - hbnday, April 17, 1978 a. Bachrsan Anderson (cont'd) 1r. Larry Cramer, Bachman Anderson, spoke to the charge from the owner to find a site which has essentially the points this site has in points of beauty end least violation to the natural environment. He spoke briefly to 1•:r. Baird's background, explaining his work with the Elie Creek Center and his award winning building et the Nyland Nature Interpretative Center, and to the wrest deal of ti:..e spent with the City Staff developing plans for the proposed building so as not to ruin the lake and to fit it into the natural contour of the site. Anderson es}:cd whether at any joint, the building will be higher than the trees. Baird responded negative, and that even though the building would be four stories, it would he built into the ground with only two stories above the ground about twenty feet. A resident of Ensign Rd. expressed objection to the height of the building and requested that it be spread out. Baird responded that the parking ramp is twelve feet above the ground and spoke to their landscaping and screening plan; use of brick or eartt:tone colors, end the use of the curve form for the build- ing to follow the natural contour of the land because it softens. the effect. Anderson naked that the Biacklock Line be pointed out on the slides, and what • the jroperty owners: were planning on doing with that land. Baird responded • it would be dedicTted to the City, aid they would use a natural b^rricr such as the priceley ash end sumac. Bremer spoke to the ore and one-half story parking ramp, explaining that the owners were willing to spend the naney. Baird responded to cuestions on the steep drive-way - which was being raved over; proper screening - re-olenting of trees; and handling of the sewer - which was out in for Gelco and e tended across to serve both buildings. Jim 05berg, 4550 Ti:_ber Trail, expressed concern on the iia ortence of exterior lighting, color of the building, the north shore of Anderson Lakes, and to an EIS to show how it will effect :,nderson Lakes. • Baird responded there will be ra.ni::ana lighting, with some security lighting on the shore side, end referred to the Planning Co:x..ission reco:__endation • on kinds of lights. The gentlenen from Ensign Rd. asked what would be done about the traffic on 78tc Street since Gelco came in, and spoke to the additional traffic • along Ensign Bond, which is residential and of great concern to residents. • Lambert responded tint our engineering staff is going to meet with the Bloo- mington engineering staff for a solution. hruell comeented ththe would like to know the relationship of this protect to other projects on Anderson Lakes and consider as a whole, rather than j step by step. La::,bert spoke to Gelco and only one other project coming in on the north side of Anderson Lnkea. Minutes - Parks, Rec. and approved Iiatural Resources Commission - 4 - Monday, April 17, 1978 a. Rachman Anderson (contrd) I4OTI04;: Tangen noved to recosuaend to the Council approval of the Planning Concession recommendation of April 6, 1973 of re-zoning and acccitance of the ten items with the two following changes: Fo,_10 to`eadd: Lighting shall be of the low canopy type which con- fines liF'ting to the site area, and additional lighting which would be necessary for minimum security Iurposes of the lower level. Addition o' '..^. 11: Final exterior color and materials be reviewed and rrpr.ved by to ilanning Staff, with the understanding that the blcn•:ing with the natural areas should be done to a :cxir;u:O effect, r.reforable with the use of earth tones and natural materials. hruell seconded for pi;r ones of discussion. DISSLSSI'CN: D. Anderson asked how agree.r-ent on colors would be accomplished noting, the prcbloms in the irescrvc recently. Tangen spoke to re- view by the Planning Staff. krucll asked how ,any :.:odes were considered before this parking plan was agreed upon. Baird s ekc to two to three considered. VCTE: ration carried urcnir.ously. b;OTIC:.: hruell moved to :irect the Staff to check with the trine Idle Creek ':hr tcrsbad l ist.riot to inform us cf the net effect of the T_resont and prop. sod drainage plans on the water level of Anderson Lakes. Johnsen seconded, notion carried unenirously. 4. Suaocr Recreation Iro,,r_m 1. Sr,.cr=;VV bry l.or.c_nt Recreation Supervisor '.~'arts spoke to her reams of April 14th and to eor:porison of on going programs with last year's rrefram and to new vrograr.a. She spoke to the trogroir to be planned on a schedule to fit the format cf Year Round School.(intcrcession schedule) 2. Leisure %hail(rime i erts spoke to this new program started last swm.oer, explaining that translertation was a major problem. She added that they are looking to renting a vehicle, and recon ncnds a $10 registration fee to help defray the transportation costs end fees for specialists. Tangen asked whether fees were a deterrent to some children in the City. Werth responded that any child that cannot pay is covered by PROP. She suggested that a policy could be sot by the Commission for such cases. approved Planning Commission Minutes -5- April 10, 1978 D. Bachman-Anderson Center, request by Bachman Anderson, Inc., for rezoning from Rural to Office for approximately 12 acres located north of Anderson Lakes and South of I-494 . Continued item. The Planner informed the Commission the proponent has refined the plan to decrease the grading, and the staff has discussed traffic concerns with Bloomington City staff. He stated the project is anticipated to generate 1400 AN. Mr. Baird, Douglas A. Baird Architects, stated the grade of the entrance has been decreased from 13% down to 7%, the parking lot would be curved with 2nd phase parking accomplished through decking, and they do concur with the staff report. The Planner stated the building is approximately 250-400 feet from the Blacklock Line , the site plan protects and respects the lakeshore, the majority of drainage will go to West 78th Street, and the proponents have agreed to construct a privacy barrier between the site and lakeshore. Sundstroir, • asked what the lake level is todate. The Planner replied it is somewhat below the 833 contour. Redpath inquired if West 78th Street could be changed to a one-way west bound from the Ensign Road area west. • Levitt inquired whet adverse effects the development would have on the lake. The Planner responded the staff believes the plan respects the lakes, and the • watershed district will be submitting their recommendations soon. He suggested any commission recommendation on approval should be contingent upon the watershed district review and approval. • • • Beaman asked if the project meets requirements of the Shoreland Management Act. The Planner replied it meets and exceeds the requirements. • Mr. Osherg,9550 Timber Trail, inquired about the visibility of the building from the lake side. The Planner replied it would have less impact than the present Gelco Building, Geneva Middleton, 9411 Timber Trail, stated she has in the past carefully_ monitored lake development, _ expressed concern that. no"environmental reports were done,and that. more time should be allowed for input.__She believed, although it may have less impact than Gelco, __it will_effect more single_family, __ The Planner stated according to State Regulations no EAW is required and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources would be considering the item soon before it goes to the Council,thereby allowing considerable time for input. Mr. Hubred, 8056 Ensign Road, inquired how soon the second phase of building would begin. Mr. Baird replied he is unsure. Mr. Bud Belk,8116 Ensign Road, suggested duplexes or quads would be a more transitional use than Lhe office proposed. Le.).-j"J H approved Planning Commission Minutes -6- April 10, 1978 Mrs. Mikelson, 8049 Ensign Road, inquired if the office could be constructed on the north side of the site and not into the side of the hill . Mr. Baird ( responded such siting of the building would require considerably more grading. Mrs. Olson, 801f, Ensign Road, stated she would prefer the site be developed in residential uses instead of office. Sundstrom and Levitt both expressed concern that uses of residential would have more impact upon the lake than the proposed office. Geneva Middleton felt more information should be received by the City prior to action. Don Peterson, 7025 Mariann Drive, believed multiple on this particular site would be infeasible. He believed the proposal is sensitive to the site and the only way to preserve the hill would be if it is purchased by the City. ^i Lynch inquired if the City could ask for an EAW even though it is not required. The Planner stated , since the project does not need an EAW according to-State Regulations and the City has not adopted separate criteria , that the City cannot require an EAW. He added the watershed district would be carefully reviewing storm water plans, drainage plans, sedimentation ponds proposed, and erosion control ret`,odc . Mr. Sutherland, Ra_hman-Anderson, stated they have worked 3 months with the 1. City staff, intend to keep the site as natural as possible, meet watershed district requirements, and request the commission take favorable action on the request so all information complied on the request can be forwarded to the City Council for action. • ? , approved .d Planning Commission Minutes ' -7- . April 10, 1978 Motion: Lynch moved, Levitt seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the Bachman-Anderson rezoning of ?2 acres from Rural to Office subject to the staff report of 4-6-78 and the site plan presented tonight 4-10-78. Motion carried 5:1 with Bearman voting nay. Motion lynch moved, Levitt seconded, to strongly recommend to the Council that traffic concerns are such that if West 78th Street cannot be made a one-way street west in order to mitigate major traffic concerns of the project, then approval of this project should be reconsidered. Motion carried unanimously. `} CreekWatershed District �� ` �' • �� ��-=� ;%• Nine Mile 4344 IDS CENTER t [: J. MINNEAPOLIS, MlNNESOTA 55402 -8 April 19, 1978 • Mr. David Weir tit (0 ) 1`O Cramer-Weir Construction U \ ) 12450 Wayzata Blvd. Cr`'°b .,' Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 C /`�' Re: Bachman-Anderson, Inc. Building • Dear Mr. Weir: The Board of Managers of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans and grading and land alteration permit application as submitted to the District for the above referenced project. The Managers find the plans to be in general conformance with the policies of the District and, therefore, approve of the grading and land alteration permit subject to the following. 1. The District will require that the hay bales shown on the erosion control plan be installed prior to the commencement of land alteration. These bales must remain in place and be properly mcin:_..:,: d until all altered areas on the site have been restueed- 2. A detailed utility plan must be submitted to the District for review and approval. 3. The District requests to be notified 48 hours prior to the commence- i went of land alteration. If you have any questions regarding the District's comments, please contact us at 920--O655. . ;Yours truly, .00 e„.4, X John D_ Dickson BARR ENGINEERING CO. Engineer for the District Approved by the Board of Managers j, NINE MILE CREEK WATE1 :D,,DISTRICT / j JDD/111 L'1/1-tom/ L '• _G%/I'4-e?:i nE ''. cc: Mr. Raymond Raik Mrs. Phyllis Larsen Date:__,/7Y_Tf Mr. Chris Eager MEMO TO: Planning Conn ission FROM: Chris Fuger, Planning Director DATE: April 6, 1978 PROPONENT: Bachman-Anderson Inc. PROJECT: Rezoning of 12 acres from Rural to Office District LOCATION : Co. Rd. 1C/ 1-494, North Shore of Anderson. takes LOCATION: The project is loctt>d on the Eden Prairie/Bloomington border, south of West 78th Street , north of Anderson Lakes, and west of Co. Rd.18. • 1 ..� 41 i \\Lalt rt ,.c 1. �`• ,ram- . • - • l; ;- a,c to •Road. • tom,.• Anderson ,.•Lakes • 11 i' BACKGROUND The ]968 Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts this area as industrial with park decianal ion abutting Anderson Lakes shoreline. There was a • previous proposal or this site by McGlynn-Gnrurarker for ],"O large luxury condominiums. -This previous proposal was partly on this site, cod partly on the site imm.Aiatel3 to the west. The condominiums wore to be a six story tcrr..i;d building which rerluired the shclfim;-off of the ?. top of the hill la providr plaza space, parking, and underground parking. This proposal scia d ,rcceptcble because it provided a building type which stepped-down the b`11. aq0 1: .+1 i�.�--!.� -�..-�. r...+ ►.. a._s ru a::1 a•.LGs rn r.-fin+,...............1 is. ri. ,, \_/ t,jJ .fir i. •r' - \ f-:::,..,::!___:_'_:-T.--_-.;' ,•:::::.;:•••••,\,-;,--.:-•1'.:.) f-- t.,.:„,:..) t..:.,..i„. ..: )...„1._;:.1,..,:s-',,;*-• ,.....:`.;.:_-_-:%-. .:.•-:::-...:-%•s.'ZI,....y ,..-,4'1::-.._,\ }...„---._:*.• R-,:•77,s.,i1,! �;. -_ ,,--.ram r ;:. . • / /i:1` S /. ,tom - ,��`✓`�'' / • j/��\�•N\`} — h\,- , _le, ��F?/ '\ t ., .r,r^ //``ire i3� .ti� t /t 1 y ifW v -\� ✓,\ :; lid \\- ' / ,���j 1 �\' 1.,.:::,-:... .:. \,:e iY,,.0' .j:: (774.,. .<7.)::.'N''`.-:- , :,'>,.?5:',',/:../ 71 1 e,\'.-,•:.'.›,t:`, ' (� • �� ^\ /\ 1. `- \.) . �. i / : , --•\ `/' / y ...-,..2%--:,;., ' --, .-:.,,,.-.. ., ..: //( \ ,, . \\:•,,,-;::-. ,-..‘- ; .::-‘,.- .,::1,-,---- :-._- :.-..,,,,:-,7;:"i.-- f,.>.-- ,,,-,...-7,,-,:':;:;‘,,,;;;;-' ./7 k .: : ' / 7 t/ < r ( .ii, . Y' _ •riZ1_4tzc':Z•.•,?:1-:...:2i1V}\`.Jar\✓ �.'" iII % ''�'Q.S1GN x ' 4/tx•_3!tik.'"-. --ill °-V--" Est l` .( --- ' n 1rr\ C, � ), Q j- J ra� 1=375 t! I1n./ q C I , 11 t (;((- ;, 11(15 4)i t A$,1 2.i --'' :: ( 1�i� (: '.\!// 'F :%�/ 1 li.j t....-.,zr V\i"--7.,;-----. C,"— -,,-,,Z1",,,,--,-----,?,..),1*I , cif, 1�r'- 11 .��� ,i fI 1. `/` c l_lt r� '1•_�I.j{'�'P I r7"'-: fi j r k .6/ A\))-: --\'IP i I ';1' t VT - . ^ 1 r 77 {�o�;�'T� �jll(-I -f re ,,U2 Memo-Bachman-Anderson, Inc. -2- April 6, 1978 Background, continued • • The 1978 Draft Guide Plan again depicts the park area to be preserved • for shoreland open space and also designates connercial , of an office or commercial type, on the remainder of the site. In 1974 , Les Blacklock , was engaged by the City of Eden Prairie to do a wildlife study of the Anderson Lakes Area. As part of this study a 'no build' line around the lake was delineated and was called the Blacklock Line. The current proposal is in conformance with • the Blacklock Line. • ORDINANCE I;t_Q111P•fhldillS From Ordinance 135 , Section 6, Office District, • Suhd. 6. 1, Purposes • re addition to the objectives prescribed in Article I f•c eral Objectives, the OIC C ffte District is included in the zoning ordinance to achieve the following purposes: • a) To provide opportunities for offices of a semi- connercial character to locate outside of commercial • districts. b) To establish and maintain in portions of the Village • the high standards of site planning , architecture and landscape design sought by many businesses and professional offices. • c) To provide adequate space to meet the needs of modern offices including off-street parking of automobiles • and where appropriate off-street loading of trucks. d) To provide space for semi public facilities and institutions that appropriately may be located in office districts. e) To minimize traffic congestionand to avoid the over • - loading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the amount of land around them. f) To protect offices from noise disturbance, traffic hazards, and other objectionable influences incidental to certain corwuercial uses. 1,.: 4t Memo-Bachman-Anderson, Inc. -3- April 6, 1978 Subd. 6.2 Permitted Uses a) Business and professional offices and accessory uses. b) Supporting commercial sales and services to office users within large office structures only. c) Public and quasi-public facilities and services required by the resident or working population. • • Subd. 6.3 Required Conditions a) Ali uses shall complywith the regulations prescribed in Section 2, ( Site, Yard, hulk, Usable Open Space, Screening, Landscaping , Parking, Loading , and Performance Standards). b) All professional pursuits and businesses shall be conducted entirely within a canpletely enclosed structure except for off- street parking and loading areas. c) Acreptable , approved sanitary seer services must he provide to all occupied structures. d) Zoning requests will be considered only on the basis of a comprehensive development plan for the entire area to be • zoned and specific plans for initial structures and site development. The following are setback and performance standards for Office District: • Minimum lot size 20,000 square feet Minimum width 100 feet Minimum depth 100 feet • Minimum front yard setback 35 feet • Minimum side yard setback 20 feet one side, 50 feet both sides combined. • Minimum rear yard setback 20 feet floor Area Ratio max. .3 1 story building .5 mutt-story building Maximum height of main structure 30 feet is Memo-Bachman-Anderson, Inc. -4- April 6, 1978 • SURROUNDING LAND USES • The project is bordered on the east by current proposal by AnCor in Bloomington which is an office building; on the southeast by • single family hones in Bloomington; on the South by Anderson Lakes on the North by West 78th Street; and on the west by vacant land designated in the Guide Plan as industrial. • TRANSPOP,TAT108 SYSTEWS: • Access to the site is proposed to be taken from West 78th Street. West 78th Street connects to US 169/212 to the east which currently has an on-ramp onto 1-494 Eastbound. There is construction expected to be commenced this summer to implement to off-ramp from 1-494 to US 169. • • To the east on West 78th Street there is a connection to Co_ Rd 18. • Current average daily trips on Co. Rd. 18 arc in excess of 5,000. • Traffic courts from 1076 at the Eden Prairie/Bloomington border on West. 78th Street siiei an average daily trip of 2825 . The Count; any • State Ilic_1!noy DeI:r rents currently are studying the intersection • problems of Co. Rd. 18 Gnd 1-494. The Eden Prairie Planning Commission and City Council recommended, in feb.,197^, to the Minnesota Department of Transportation, that a • more detailed look be given to the 1-494/Co.Rd. 18 interchange area to • provide good access to Washington Avenue area north of 1-494, and the area directly north of Anderson Lakes. • There is a concern from the people living in the Ensign Road Area in • Western Bloomington that traffic from Eden Prairie proceeding east on West 78th Street will short circuit the west 78th Street / Co.Rd. 18 intersection by proceeding through on Ensign Road to gain access to • Co. Rd. 18. In traffic counts done on Jan. 10, 11, R 12th , 1978, • • by Bloomington Engineering Staff, a total traffic count of 2600 trips during a 16 hour period , 6:00 am - 10:00 pm , was obtained with a generation of approximately 20 vehicle from West i£th Street through the Ensign Road Ara. Bloomington is anticipating a grade separated • • overpass connecting West. 78th Street and Eden Prairie with Tosrnlinn Road • in Bloomington across Co. Rd. 18. As an alternative to this, Lyle Burg. Bloomington Traffic Engineer, suggests an on-grade , ingress / egress • movement between Townline Road and Co. Rd. 18; widening , channeliyation twin lanes ;and other geometric. or controlled features might he ingrle- mented to extend the time of which on grade access may be tolerated • It seems clear, that as traffic increases on the nortbshore of Anderson Lakes, and from the [den Prairie Center, upgrading of the 1.494/Co.Rd. 18 interchange area must be accomplished. WIG • • • • ..,1 • \\\ Li‘.: ......,\...__.....,,..,.............. /..,............,. .../ ,i )'-_______.--- _.-- -"----:---- - ------..-. .- ..s............ _____ — --. ------- N •••.:,-..., ---:77_,--------',---"T II ----7.1\ C=9 ---- \/‘ I Y‘ • \ f . 1:::::: . ---12\ •,- __.- • . .. :::,.: -.'77 .'••••••••••••:''': i....._ •••••• • ••••••• ••••••• `. • • ; •..•::•:.•: . .::::• ::.....*::::.i.:*•ii.::::::::'::: ::.M , -N , 7,.. .., ..•::::::::::,111:„;:•:: : 4,......... .:,................. .:.......ci: ::: :•..._•...._, .. ...: :: . .. •.,-.......::::::!•........,(1 /::::.:::::.•::::•:...- :::: : \ :.:•:::::::::•:::::::,,, :: :.....,../....:::::: :•.:.::•:.•:•. ..,..........i 1— , :::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::.:-:::::•:.•: .\ tl:::•:::::./....:::::::';'. 7• :.:.:11::';.;.:',1:.1....:.....::11.::.:;..:',:..::::...::::::., :.i.:.1.:;":11.;:::.:,:.:.1..!.‘,.:•:.:',.../l.:::.::::.:• .::.::.:.::.::.:.::.: '' - :.: ?•:.:1 :H::.::::::::::: ::::::::"::::::1,1,..'::.• • ' .' ' ••••:••••••••••••... ••••,•,,, i . • • .. . .• •... ....... .... •••••••••.•....,:.,•.:..• 1.....::::::.:: : :: . LI) :.::.::::::: :: ::•:.:::: : :...:..•.::.::.:,..:...:',::::.:.:;•:, . (.:5::: :::::'.::;:: : :: :::::: :.*!:.:;:::.::::•:,::...... ..,„::*•:.....H: Y;::!;;.-.7'. ..-:::::'•,*::::.:::::.:.**••••••:•:.::.H::• I . . ..;;••:.:Pi::.:i•••:?..-1::*11.:..:::.:::::.: •:::::::::::.•:...,;..: :< ,, :::., ::::..... ..::,.....::::::::::::. . 1:::•t:`:::'.'.::::•::•••••••••••••::::.:' :•-'•••*:-.'•*-e'S-::. ..• •••:••...1 •••• :•:..• :;•::•::::...f.• z . .. . • ••••••• ••••••••••••••••••:••:•:::. ••.*:---;-:-...:•:• •:::::::•:; ••••.•:::: •-•::::•:::• ... . • • ... ::::.::.:: :•::.......'•:.::.*:::::.:::::::::::•::::.:::.:::::::.:;;.':7.:'•:.:::.::::::: :••••::.*,......... ....:.::. I •...._- : :*.I.::::::::•:..::::•i::.:::::.*:::;::•••••.*::•:.:1...;•:.::: ::.::.:::::;1:::1 ::..:::.:;••••.::::::::!:::.... . 4,, .." /1 i:::::::::::0Th.::::::::::::::::::::.::•A::::::::r%W. .::::::::.1 . :.•:••••.•: ::••••••-•:•:.•:•:: .•::, : ':•: :• - '-...LL:.;:•:.:•..*::// n .. i •.......:•:•::•::•:•::•:::: .....• ::.1 - ..• • • ...::::::::::::•:::::::•:.....-:: ::: i,..„.,.:•:••••.::•i:::.;_,.:.,..;-. ...:.::::••:•. '...) , : ::•••,:,.:••••.1-:4'. .,..•::::.:::::.:...„:;:...:: . . . •. . •. •. ••••••• •. ,,..•.••• !,\ 0 1 ... ) . . . . . . . ,.- .. . .• .• . „.i. . • . . . .. .. 0 •...::::.:: : ' . . 1., .. ........" .• 2 • • .,.. /)4/(4! .j. • ' • • Memo-Bachman --Anderson, inc. -5- April 6, 1978 The Bachman- Anderson proposal is anticipated to be , at ultimate development, approximately 100,000 square feet of office space. Our traffic projections would show a typical traffic generation of 14 average daily trips / 1,000 square feet . With both phases fully developed, we would anticipate a traffic generation of approximately 1400 A0T. With growth in Eden Prairie, we can expect that as much as 50% of this traffic will ultimately proceed to the west. • • SITE PLAN This site offers many design opportunities while at the same time presenting many difficult site constraints. the severe change in elevation from a lake elevation of 838.6 to a high elevation of 914.3 makes this a • difficult site to develop. • The buildings proposed are curvilinearin nature and will be benched into the hill form with two stories occurring out of the ground on the north • side, end 3-4 stories out of the ground en the south side depending upon • pate:01 td7ed.raphy. The buildings range from bnt.w en 400-600 feet in distance from the the normal erdinary high water mark, which has been established at 838.6. The Shore]and Management Act requires a distance of 150 feet from normal high otter mark t.r building. Although our zoning ordinance allows • a ground coverage in Office District of up to 30%, when the proposed building footprint is compared to to the total land area, building coverage of less than 10'.. is anticipated. the area occurring between the office building and iunterson Lakes should remain essentially untouched during • the construction period. , In order to retain significant: oak trees on the top of the knoll a grade • of 13"• for a short distance on the approach road will he required. However, • major access to the building and the parking area will be gained through • a major drive not. exceeding 7% with a short ]0% rise. The proposal requires cutting in to the northeast side of the knoll to provide for a parking area . This first phase parking area will he benched into the northeast side of the • knoll and will he stepped down the hill se that it meets grade at the north- east corner of the parking area. The southeast corner of the parking area, although sloped to that point, will be about 5 feet out of the ground. This will be treated with a retaining wall structure rather than through heretnr. The hard line created by this retaining wall will be broken • with miss vegetation. A second phase parking anticipated with the construction of the second building aril] slope in the same manner as the parking bencath.The fan shaped way in wlu nh the parking is now proposed will provide wedges of green • space in which trees will he planted. ibis will break up the large parking area and will provide canopy trees that will grow up through corresponding wedges in the second level ramp. /cc�lr/] i • Memo-Bachman-Anderson, Inc. -6- April 6, 1978 The Planning Staff recommends that the second phase building be pulled back from the eastern property line and that the building be stepped-down from the west to the east in order to decrease the crass when viewed from the Bloomington residents. In addition overstory canopy vegetation should be introduced of significant size on the southeast corner of the second phase building in order to break-up the mass created. Complete access to the rear of the building must be available to • • emergency fire vehicles. This is being studied by the proponent,but should allow emergency vehicles to proceed to the rear of the building in the event of a fire. • ., e. ANDERSON LAKES As previously stiffed the normal h qh water mark is 833.G for Anderson Lakes. The buildings proposed are a considerable distance from this lire, varying from 400-000 feet from the line. ,1: The proponent. understands and agrees with , and would like to support the concept of Anderson Lakes Nature Area. To this end, the proponent 1. proposes to donate to the City of Eden Prairie all that land lying south of the Les Blacklock Line on the site. The proponent.will ho modifying the legal description to reflect rezoning to office only for that area lying north of the Blacklock line. The land proposed for rezoning to office should carry with it a requirement for cash park fee of $1200/acre. Tile proponent further agrees that a barrier acceptable to the City staff of either impenetrable vegetation, or fencing will be established as part of the construction of the project in order to prevent disturbance of the shorelend nesting areas. DRAINAGE • Drainage from all impervious surfaces on this site can be taken to the north to West 781h Street and se!acquently to the Nine Mile Creek Area. This a. site plan and Trading plan must he reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile t Creel. Board of Managers with recommendations or sedimentation ponds , skimuning structures, and erosion control during construction. a f 'f Km-Bachman-Anderson, Inc. -7- April 6, 1978 RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the rezoning of approximately 12 acres from Rural to Office District based upon the following items: 1. Final grading plans must be submitted to the City Planning and Engineering staff prior to final approval. 2. Detailed landscaping plans showing buffering along the eastern border , overstory tree planting within the parking area, and revegetation of graded slopes must be submitted to city staff prior to building permit issuance. 3. All grading and drainage plans must be submitted to and approved by the Nine tole Watershed District . • 4. The impact of the second phase building upon the Bloomington residents must he mitigated using the following measures: a. Distance from the eastern property line to the building should be increased. • b. building should ha designed to terrace from the west to the east to decrease the massing. • • c. Buffering and vegetation shall be introduced along the southerly and easterly ends of the second phase building • and easterly edge of the parking ramp area. • r> . Access to the rear of the building for fire and emergency vehicles shall be provided subject to staff approval. • 6 . Significant deviation from the approved site plan and building , plans submitted shall he reviewed by the Planning Commission. 7 . That an effective barrier acceptable to the staff be constructed on or north of the Blacklock Line in order to prohibit distur- • bance of the wildlife area. • 8 . The City accept the proposal to donate the land south of the • Blacklock Line as part of the overall Anderson Lakes open space area. 9 . That cash park fee of $1200/acre he applied to the acreage requested for rezoning payable at time of building permit issuance. 10 . Lighting in the parking•erea shall be of the low canopy type • which comfinos lighting to the site area. • CE:jj 12UU6) . i viz 41 ^�,, (.. i ., r :1• `,,, inr,esota .', vet ! ' . „ .,y ,�r, r, r !fin • a A ",, 7" r ,c v 0 obi,T .i u u_JL,l ItiC. P.O.Bo.346-Almneo o!,s,,Amnes 55440 `>t , .cri`1 '' 'SA,'C CPC COO LAKES' • March 30, 1918 Mr. Rod Sundstro 1, Chairman • • Eden Prairie Planning Con:nission • 8950 Fuca Prairie load Eden Prairie, ti'1. 55343 • Re: Bechm:n-Anderson Proposal • Dear Mr. Sundstrom: • It has come to the attention of the Minnesota Waterfowl Association that the above ht^r.ticned proposal is currently before your con;nission. We are concerned about the revironcwntal effects of this project and the total develop;ucnt now tieing c�419 ideied both ill [den prairie and Bloomington on the north shore of )',jjrde s(I;, Le.,.-_, This includes the recent 1'1r-0 development and their exPCCteG fel-ere eY.paeoh, and now this proposed Slf,,, ,Kant alteration to the environment by Ba::l;ta n--Aedorsou and the Aedcer parcel. • • It would not appear at this tint! that en environmental impact statement would be mandatory, if r:e 10ot: at. each parcel separately. However, there is a very real possibility of e`ne being required if we conaider the com.iined environmental effect: of Celco, Bachman-Andersen and the Andcor developments. • • It would not aprear from the information available at the present time that any study has been uedertat;cn concerning the environmental concerns for local residents of the area. The Anderson Lakes are a significant and delicate water- fowl a'1G wild life area. We believe several key questions have not been addressed: • 1- What effect 0l1 the increased run off of surface waters carrying gasoline, oil and salt have on the water quality of the lake? 2. Whet is the drainage and hydrology situation of the total development? 3. What effect will be put upon resident wild life other than waterfowl, i.e., deer, pheasants, songbirds and forbearers? 4. Would a water pollution effect the remainder of Anderson Lakes, Bush l Lake and the iliuhland Park Reserve? •(continued) - 00 'Lime IYATFGFU17l A Ynt,r'Round 'utmost' approved Planning Contnission -5- March 27, 1978 B. Bachman-Anderson Center, request by Bachman-Anderson, lnc, for rezoning from Rural to Office for approximately 12 acres located north of Anderson .• • Lakes and South of 1-494 The Planner informed the Commission the proponents have been working with City staff since the first of the year and aspects of the project have been worked-out, but in developing the staff report. errors were discovered in the submitted grading plan and is now being redrafted. Larry Cramer, construction contractor, stated Bachman-Anderson is an incorporated insurance broker and the second largest independent insurance broker in Minnesota. • He outlined the building locations studied and the building location proposed. • Doug Baird, Douglas A. Baird Architects, presented slides of the office site location and sight line views from surrounding areas, the existing vegeta*.ion, and the area cney intend to leave as natural adjacent to Anderson takes. • He stated the first phase parking would be on-grade , and the second phase of • parking is expected to be deck parking. Lynch inquired if the Perks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission has reviewed the proposal. The Planner replied they would be reviewing it next Mon day. • The Planner then dated the proposal meets and exceeds setbacks from Anderson Lakes as the proponents are dedicating up to the 840 contour + 50 feet, and also designating areas as scenic easement. • McCulloch asked when the second phase of building is anticipated. Mr. Cramer estimated in 2-3 years. Levitt asked how large the first phase building would be. fir. Cramer stated • 50,000 square feet, 3 stories. Levitt then asked if the 500 space parking is for the first phase, or for the total project. Mr. Dave Weir, Weir-Cramer , replied it would be 500 total • parking spaces, and it does meet City ordinance requirements. McCulloch asked if any neighborhood meetings had been conducted yet. Mr. Baird • replied negative. • Richard Sampson, 8048 Ensign Road, expressed concern about traffic congestion • on West 78th Street, runoff to the lake, visibility of the building and parking from the Ensign Road Area, and believed the development proposed is too dense for the site. • •• .approved Planning Commission -6- March 27, 1978 Sundstrom inquired if the Ensign Road neighbors conform to Eden Prairie Anderson Lake use restrictions. Mr. Sampson replied they have no formal restrictions on lake use, but feel most residents cooperate with sensitive use of the lake. Lynch asked if an EAW would be necessary. The Planner replied negative as the project has 1300 feet of shoreland, not 1500 feet which would require a mandatory EAW. Mrs. Mikelson , 8049 Ensign Road, felt an EAW should be completed on the project. The Planner stated after the grading plan has been resubmitted, the City staff would do a comprehensive staff report which will include many of the items contained in an EAW , and that the City staff is very concerned about sensitive treatment of the lake. Dale Hubred , 8056 Ensign Road, expressed opposition to this development as it is not consistent with the single family existing. The Planner stated the present proposal has less impact upon the lake than the previous condominium proposal for 100 units. He believed the proponents would be as good of neighbors to the lake as Gelco has been. firs. Olson, 8016 Ensign Road, expressed opposition as the building would be } inconsistent * i h the single family, and complained that traffic imorovements promised when Gelco was built have not materialized and that more traffic wo.iid ,i be dangerous. • Lynch inquired if the Ensign Road residents have requested road improvements from Bloomington. They responded affirmative. . Mr. Sampson stated that dead--ending Ensign Road is a possibility the proponents should be aware of. Bud Belk , 8116 Ensign Road, stated 35 of the 36 residents of the Ensign Road Area signed a petition against office development next to them in Bloomington, and believes 'the same will oppose this office development in Eden Prairie. • Mrs. Olson suggested the site be developed in duplexes. Motion Re-ifpath moved, Retterath seconded, to continue the rezoning request to the April 10 meeting for a staff report if grading plans are submitted in time. Motion carried unanimously. /.,N)1l v` �„. 1-26-78 REPORT TO THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION REGARDING THE VICINITY IN THE "NWLY PORTION OF BLOOMINGTON" • • At the regular meeting of the Traffic & Transportation Advisory Commission on • 1-12-78, there was an item (No. 6) on the agenda titled "Review of Proposed Office Building by Andcor Co.-8000 Town Line Avenue". The stated item had been referred • to the I & 1AC by the Planning Commission at their 1-5-78 meeting. Following dis • - cussion of the matter, there was a consensus that the T & TAC, at their regular meeting on 1-26-78, would review further the traffic circumstances relative to • the immediate area of the Andcor proposal but would also consider the status of the larger area in the northwesterly portion of Bloomington. The latter would • include the intersection area of 1-494 and Co. Hwy. No. 18 and would also include general consideration of Highway 18 through Bloomington. The projected accessibility and street arrangement for the Ensign Road area was of particular interest. The alternative considerations for West 78th Street (Town • Line Avenue) west of Highway 18 are of pertinent interest to the subject area. • • The alternate considerations could include the following: 1. Grade separation between Hwy. 18 and the connected local street system of W. 78th St. (Town Line Ave.) on the west side of Hwy. 18, together with Highwood Drive (old 82nd St.) on the east sid" of Hwy. 18. This alternate involving a "grade separation-overpass or underpass-" would likely not occur until Hwy. 18 reaches con- struction stage for a "controlled access-freeway standards" type of roadway. 2. The continuation of W. 78th St. (Town Line Ave.) along the westerly side of Hwy. 18 to the street system southerly of Anderson Lakes -. and possibly connected to the proposed Amsden Road interchange with Hwy. 18 in the glst St. vicinity. This alternate wouldn't occur until Hwy. 18 is reconstructed from I-494 to the 91st St. vicinity because of space needs. 3. Terminate 78th St. (Town Line Ave.) in advance (west) of Hwy. 18. • This alternate might be implemented (together with an emergency • vehicle access provision from the east) during a construction • period. Improvement of 78th St. from Ensign Road westerly in Eden Prairie to Schooner Blvd. (approximately a 1 mile distance) would likely be necessary if this alternate would be chosen as a permanent arrangement. The stated improvement of W. 78th St. could include consideration of a 'divided roadway" concept such • that greater security of accessibility and emergency vehicle pro • - tection would exist. 4. As larger improvements occur at the 1-494 and ik•ry. 18 intersection, it could prove workable for some directional ingress and/or egress to be provided through the "slip-ramp" principle. This alternate could not be approved until near "time of construction" for the major roadway facilities. This alternate shouldn't be assumed as being available until approval from the larger jurisdictions (County, State & possibly Federal) was secured. / - , 5. Further alternatives could evolve through combinations of portions of one or more of the preceding listed concepts. "Portions" as stated should be understood to include "permitted movement only" and "one-way" segments. An example might be to allow right-turn exit-entrance only relative to southbound Hwy. 18 and no crossover or left-turn movements. Provisions of this nature should be allowed only when potential safety, needs, costs, and related aspects are determined reasonable and in concert with general public interests. It may be practical to "stage" certain on-grade access provision with tolerances predicated by traffic • volume magnitudes in the interchange area and on Hwy. 18. Alternate 5 is likely to merit consideration as long as Hwy. 18 remains an on-grade or "expressway design" with limited access. When Hwy. 18 becomes a controlled access type roadway, the appurt- enant connection arrangements discussed in Alternate 5 are not 1 likely to be practical or allowed. 6. Alternate 6 could be thought of as on-grade ingress-egress move • - ments between Town Line Ave. and Hwy. 18. Widening, channelization, twin lanes, and other geometric or control features might be imple- mented to extend the time of which on-grade access may be tolerated. Some background information can be obtained from "area plans" for the subject vicinity. Following arc comments in that regard. When the "Northwest Area" Plan was done in the late 60's, there was tnt....tional desire to avoid extremely convenient, direct, or short coupled accessibility be- tween the major roadways (I-494 or iIny. 18) and the adjacent land areas. • • The Western Area Plan of 1972, the Revised Western Area Plan of 1975, and the • recent Comprehensive Plan for the City of Bloomington all support concepts of the stated nature. Safety and integrity of traffic movement on the major road- ways is generally enhanced through minimizing intersections and on-off facilities. • The Area Plans indicated predominately residential and open space land uses in the northwesterly portion of Bloomington (but south of 1-494). A great amount of open space and grecnway area Was projected. Large tracts of open spaces have been secured. Land deveiopirent type on nest of the land area west of East Bush Lake • Road and north of 84th Street is now committed. Densities are becoming more predictable and access needs can be more accurately realized. The latest Area Plan indicates a grade separation (overpass) over Hwy. 18 connecting Town Line Ave. and Highwood Drive. That alternative may he in the best interests of the majority of people in and near the area. Lconondc feasibility will need evaluation and acceptance before strong confidences should be developed for antici- pation of that bridge. The geometries of the 1-494 and Hwy. 18 interchange will influence the grade separation feasibility and cost. Hwy. 18 is going to continue gaining in traffic flow demand. Development in Eden Prairie and in Bloomington ni11 contribute large volumes of traffic to Hwy. 18. The lack of reasonable alternate roadways assures the validity of that statement. A crossing of the Minnesota River on some alignment with direct continuity of Hwy. 18 is a clear necessity from a regional perspective and is in concert with the expressed position of the Bloomington City Council. I -1 It is anticipated that accessibility to serve the Ensign Road and Town Line Ave. roadways will be retained to and from Hwy. 18 until the major highway improve- ments occur. It might become necessary to implement some turning movement controls and to make relatively minor "turn-lane" geometric improvements - dependent upon- the delay before the larger highway improvements occur. The Traffic Division has made an appreciable number of volume studies in the area during the past year. Detail information from those will be furnished to the Com- mission before the Feb. 9, 1978, hearing. Copies of the Planning Commission minutes of 1-5-78 are included with this report (those relatirg to the Andcor con- sideration). The Public Works Staff will review sone of the Hwy. 18 materials with the Commission at the 1-26-78 meeting. Respectfully submitted, i Lyle L. Berg, Traffic Engineer l: ii,o1U 29176 t3-731 4 . PORTABLE TRAFFIC RECORDER DATA SHEET • LOCATION�es# 7Q St: . Ui COUNTY ncn,.ffji STATION NO. I FOs? City I..4M t • • COUNT BEGINNING DATE 9-2 2-7` DATA BY V.a 4 a E. DATE q-ZZ Q-Z3 9 Z¢ 7 AVERAGE of COUNT DAY MON TUE WED THUR FRI SAT SUN � rY. EI:DA� WEFK END 12-IAM IS /9 - 1-2 12. 12 2-3 --6 2 3-4 — _L6, µ -. - 4-5 � R �3 - ---, 5-6 J !9 _ 25 67 89 R1 7-8 I 1 L90 ,80 B-a i}-- I 2 5 1 _-- 9-10 I 115- I s 10-1 -1 Q O I 11_12NI --- !5'9 r 12-1 _ 2a_ _ 3 4 I _- 12_/1_ 22S- 1 - -aT 27.6_ 3Q2 --_-- i l 5-6 _ 299 I26_B - — �T 1�a_1135-_ _ - ------ w 7-8 _i_o_ _13.6_ o-9 l -- - 92__,1/3- -------- -------- - _9-10 _5' 6.f __ 1 :0-II 27 Lti - __,, II-I2M Y _16 25 ---- ~ i TOTAL 103it 21/6 (goo __— _ .. ' SKETCH AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC Z,!?)ZS RemGrks: N — — • 1,, RECORDER TYPE: HR ® MR CI AR CI I r. a' _. _-. _ .._ 1 .0 2517613-731 PORTABLE TRAFFIC RECORDER DATA SHEET LOCATION WC + 1 - Srree'� (� COUNTY /`*enf�-P4n STATION Nil, i'� T �/ /(o4- Z/z COUNT BEGINNING DATE 9- Z Z-76 DATA BY 22o. Fr ' , P.. DATE q_Zz 9-Z3 9-z4- AVERAGE of COUNT DAY MON TUE WED .THUR , FRI SAT , SUN WEEKDAY WEEK END 12-IAM 1-2 2-3 - - 3-4 , 4-5 5-6 - 6-7 - . l 7-8 - • i 9-10 i ,90-11 j �{ II-I2N 1__^ } 12-1 _ 1-2i ; _ 2-3 3-4 S+L.^f CP-rcK $nd 5-6 _ 6-7 - - 7-8 - I 8 9 — 9-10 l0-11 -II-12M - �r. TOTAL t-3.14- ZZ96 SKETCH AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC N Remorks: 0,04 04 i 71,tc-4 1,,v-11 1 - addigr (.?o�„ /c✓ 1 ++1 S I i .i - RECORDER TYPE: HR ❑ MR 0 AR ❑ i' I MACH NO. TAPE NO. Fit F NA MEMO TO: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Chris Enger, Planning Director DATE: May 12, 1978 SUBJECT: BACHMAN/ANDERSON PROPOSAL ON ANDERSON LAKES As of Tuesday afternoon, May 11th, I was contacted by Mr. Phillip Gettes , attorney representing Anderson Lakes property owners association, regarding the Bachman-Anderson proposal. Mr. Gettes had questions regarding procedures and whether proper requirements were followed on the Bachman-Anderson proposal. The following is a brief summary of the actual meetings the City Staff has had on the Bachman-Anderson proposal. In addition to these documented meetings, a number of phone calls and other meetings were held which may not he documented. However, this list is intended to show the procedure which was followed in reviewing the Bachman-Anderson proposal. Dave Weir and Larry Cramer, representing Bachman-Anderson, first contacted me relative to this site in December, 1977. Subsequent to that meeting and discussions we had regarding impact upon wildlife traffic , and aesthetics to the Bloomington residents; I met with Mr. Weir on Jan. 20, 1978. -later I had a meeting with Larry Cramer, Feb. 7th, 1978, along with Dave Weir, Doug Baird(project architect), and James Sutherland • President, Bachman-Anderson, Inc. This meeting was regarding revisions to site plans, etc. -Feb. 28, 1978 I met again with Dave Weir to further refine the requirements of drainage, setbacks from the lake, parking requirements, minimum site coverage, and access to West 78th Street. -March 2, 1978 I met with Mr. Weir to review the application material • for rezoning. He completed the application and submitted such on March 8, 1978. The legal description and request was published in the Eden Prairie News on March 16, 1978 forthe Planning Commission Meeting of March 27, 1978. -March 27, 1978 Planning Commission public meeting. THe Commission reviewed the request in detail, and continued it to the April 10, 1978 meeting for submission of additional material on grading, access, and impact upon lake. -March 31, 1978 I met with Doug Baird and Dave Weir . Again we reviewed the drainage and grading plans, along with parking ramp details . i Memo- Bachman-Anderson -2- May 12, 1978 -April 6, 1978 I met with Dave Weir just prior to writting the staff report for the Planning Commission. -April 10, 1978 the Planning Commission again reviewed the project and listened to audience input. The Commission unanimously recommended the City Council approve the rezoning of the site from Rural to Office. (prior to the Planning Commission meeting , I met with Doug Baird for explanation of the grading plan) • -April 13, 1978 , Director of Community Services, Bob Lampert, myself Dick Anderson, Chairman of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission; and myself, met on-site to review the actual siting of the building, parking , and project impact upon the site and lake. • -April 17, 1978 the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed the project , and gave unanimous approval according to staff report recommendations. -April 19, 1978 the project was reviewed by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Managers, and their preliminary application for grading of the site was approved ..;th conditions on sedimentation control during construction. -April 25, 1978 I met with Dennis Hanson, Hennepin County Highway Department: Lyle Berg , Bloomington Transportation Engineer; Evan Green, District V MnDot Engineer; Carl Jullie, City Engineer; and Dave Weir, Bachman-Anderson, and Roger Ulstad regarding the potential traffic problem along West 78th Street. -May 1, 1978 8oh Lampert and I met with Geneva Middleton and Frank Hartman, President, Anderson Lakes Property Owner's Association, on-site to explain the actual siting of the building and so on. • • Through this entire process, the items which were of concern were : amount of coverage of the site, impact upon the site, impact upon adjacent residential , impact upon the lake, setbacks from the lake, drainage, wildlife habitat impact, potential traffic problems, adherence to Shoreland Management criteria and existing City Ordinances, and land use designation. As part of the rezoning application, the proponent furnished us with a certified property owner list of owners within 500 feet of the site to be notified of the city meetings. In addition to this, our Planning Staff did additional notification to cover the north side ofthe lake. The meeting notices were published in the Eden Prairie News on March 16, 1978 and on May 4, 1978 for the City Council meeting to be held May 16, 1978. Throughout the entire process, the Planning Staff was careful and deligent in following proper procedures and adhered to proper notification timeframes. •j Memo-Bachman-Anderson -3- May 12, 1978 The City Staff believes this project has been given careful scrutiny both by the staff and advisory commissions, and do not believe any attempt has been made to not present the most complete information possible. The City staff adhered to ordinances and processes adopted by the City as policy as beneficial to the City of Eden Prairie in reviewing the Bachman-Anderson request to rezone property on the North side of Anderson Lakes for an office structure. CE:jj May 10, 1978 City Council of Eden Prairie City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, Minnesota City Council Members: May I request your consideration and approval of this application to secure an interim use permit for the utilization of the property described below: 7928 Eden Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota N. 1/2, Sec. 14, T. 116, R. 22 Lot B, R.L.S. #895 Plat 56986 Parcel 8000 I have entered into a purchase agreement on the described property. Pending city approval of this request, it is my intention to use the property for lease or rental as office space. In my opinion, it would be suitable for businesses such as: real estate, insurance, appraisal, interior design, architectural, etc. It is my intention to seek such a tenant or tenants. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, James P. Lund • 7308 Schey Drive Edina, Minnesota 55435 MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Unapproved Monday, May 8, 197B 7:30 PM City Hall COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sundstrom , Retterath, Redpath , Bearman , Levitt , Lynch COMMISSION ABSENT: McCulloch STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger, Planning Director; Jean Johnson , Planning Assistant E. Lund Interim Use Request, request for an office interim use at 7928 Eden Road. ------ ---------- -------- The Planner located the site in question South of Lake Idlewild and North of Eden Road in the Major Center Area. He stated the Building Inspector has checked the • house for safety and fire code conformance. Lynch inquired what would happen to the property after the proposed 5 year interim agreement. The Planner believed the City could either terminate the use agreement, the structure could revert to single family, or an application for rezoning could be applied for. Bearman asked if any further information has been received from the Council relative • to a transition ordinance to assist the City in reviewing such interim use requests as asked by the Connission previously. The Planner replied after the Guiae Plan is adopted&ordinances are updated , the City would be developing such criteria if necessary. Lynch questioned if similar interim use permits would be possible along Eden Road besides Bermel/Smaby's and the requeste Lund use. The Planner believed it would be possible. Lynch expressed concern that no specific uses are being proposed. Sundstrom believed since the site is located in the MCA and will eventually be commercial, the interim use would not be spot zoning. Redpath believed since the agreement would have a five year limit, the City could after that time reevaluate the request. Motion: Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the Lund Interim Use Permit contingent upon the staff report of May 4, 1978 with a plea to the Council to adopt guidelines for reviewing interim and transitional uses in the MCA. Motion carried 4:0:2 with Lynch and Bearman abstaining. • • PLANNING STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Planning Director DATE: May 4, 1978 REQUEST: Interim Use Permit PROPONENT: Dr. James P. Lund LOCA_TiON: As shown in figure 1 this property is located at 7928 Eden Road. It is the first residential house west of 169, on the north side of Eden Road and south of Lake Idlewild. To the east is vacant property owned by Calvin Anderson ; and on the west a residential home owned by Robert Kooiman . ( letters from both property owners included in Lund's application). EXISTING USE The home is presently used as residential structure. PROPOSED USES: The 1968 Guide Plan depicted the area as Commercial. The Major Center Area PUP of 1974 depicted the area as Regional Commercial. And the proposed Updated Guide Plan depicts the area as Commercial. Major Center Area Plan attached. SITE PIAN AND STRUCTURE. The floor plan of the house is in excess of 1,000 square feet: and according to tabulations done by Walter Johnson, Chief Building Inspector, eight hard surface parking stalls would be required. Upon on-site evaluationof the site and structure, both the Planning and Building Staff felt that the 2 spaces within the garage could be counted toward the eight spaces required if they are unobstructed. This could be accomplished through the method shown in the proponent's site plan —planning for five spaces on the side of the driveway. However, an additional space must be provided along the east side to bring the project into conformance with the eight spaces required. Screening of the parking would he handled as detailed in'the application. information through the use of a six foot. high wood fence surrounding the parking area. i Staff Report-Lund Interim Use -2- May 4, 1978 The driveway area and parking area must be hard surface material, either blacktop or concrete as required by ordinance. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff would recommend the Planning Commission recommend Approval of the Interim Use Permit for the property for a period not to exceed five years , conditional upon the plan submitted and dated April 12, 1978, with the addition of a parking space to bring the total on-site parking to eight spaces. Also, the building must be inspected • and conform to Building Codes. All signs for the property must be consistent with the Office District regulations of Ord. 261. Since this is an interim use agreement, nothing in this approval shall •be construed to mean any special land designations are attributably to this prcperty in the future. All future proposals shall require rezoning according to City Ordinance. 's The Proponent should agree that at the time of conversion of this site to a future use,to bring the property into conformance with all City ordinances. • CE :jj - 3 • FIGURE 1 • LOCATION MAP m • (.....n ( -4 I ?1, ', r. i. o s:,.,,.. .'1I r-1:I,l . 1 i o o 6a�if ronn { ;_ i I 'v l ''may ` \ ° 1 Yi -.. ./'`:.-,:',.7L.j:''''..- 1 ... i ''' . . : . . z�11P, I I �) \. a 1 • q iJ • • r ( poi.r �,_� =,a:? • � '`.any,�') Eib lh ', ° \ - -) t_zii•"7:v. 1 f. — •—\--.'.'----. 2, . O /• lull•> u .N `\"; - . ,_.. ,t. C } 1 i•`Iti` ' J ''I :L7 as` �',,i �-._;_/__.r'. _ .•l rr t -'tom•- __-^ l( i- c- .... •cp r Nf /•' i;C �Q,uz t ��'� Oj �y.. ` • _- 1 - `_----'r°aa.J•_�...N .iJ4In (•l :IC b' l3(� '� t �-`_a......,- ;� q ( N ,ray $�7(fl -�—.� _�, .mrreasaara...e �� •� - 16, • N. C '\ (Yl \,i°• x,a•.. r...r:rrgaerrr �e .1 • :as ( (( ° r :jc . ; /` i titii 1O)' =L oe • \ • ��aee.pomN' ,N, �m ` n . 4 Fc ' r' ( l :•,G7 �u (` u .0•. x04� oa. o r.o � ,n ( . - a 1 xe . I•: yam__.<'( t - �`' .Yl1Rit�y�, �, ` daaa.u.c. •� .c�F 4 fx .i.n 4F,:. . C .n r • f 4`` '7 Y- • I. 1\ , .• I (l ,+,yam, �\ •b� i �.,��, �• . .1',�(..�..n.�,.1 _ ..N / • J Q@1 • 0 "d h i q1:d ! Gt f.dr.'•`hn.0'.`c 7j ,eycd�Y• , , LL E..... 4 , .4.�e• ,. tri e` :C,: b . t •.. yy 8 : I 11 t I t c , • • "---- , i • \ I ,• • • _ i. r • i /' . t . • /2G , ... . 4 . April 12, 1978 Planning Commission of Eden Prairie City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, Minnesota Planning Commission Members: I hereby apply for a special contract arrangement to permit me to use the following described property in the manner described below: 7928 Eden Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota N. 1/2, Sec. 14, T. 116, R. 22 Lot B, R. L. S. i 895 Plat 56986 Parcel 8000 I have entered into a purchase agreement on the above—described property. Pending city approval of this request, it is my intention to use the property for lease or rental as office space. I believe it would be suitable for businesses such as: insurance, real estate, appraisal, architectural, interior design, etc., and I would hope to attract such a tenant or tenants. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, `-g James P. Lund 7308 Schey Drive Edina, Minnesota 55435 • 4 Planning Commission City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, Minnesota STATEMENT OF INTENT -- In support of the application of • James P. Lund to gain a transitional use permit for the property located at 7928 Eden Road, Eden Prairie. It is the intention of the applicant to make changes and additions to the above identified property to more adequately suit the site for use as office space and interior design/drapery workshop. Such changes and additions to the site include the following: 1. Enlarge the parking area On the east side of the a '. lot to provide five (5) parking stalls., each meas- • uring 9' x 18'. Note that the double garage will be used to provide two (2) additional parking spaces. Earth fill will be added and compacted to accommo- date the enlarged parking area. 2. Install hard surfacing on the entire driveway and parking area, to include the newly-added parking # spa'-:s• 3. Erect approximately 135' of six-foot wooden privacy fencing to screen the parking area from the sur- rounding neighborhood. 4. Repair and paint the exterior of the existing struc- ture to better suit commercial use. Color: tan with contrasting trim. 5. Repair as necessary and paint interior of the existing structure to suit commercial use. 6. Install new sod around reconstructed parking area. 1 ROBERT R.KOOIMAN 7936 EDEN ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343 TN..y -y, e- l� r.r..�...-c C',.�- �'( "r'-K p C..l�i., .e .'I ✓//(/ i 4 ,c ter-cwt.-a' er-t.= tit,, 1 7214 Topview Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota April 20, 1978 55344 • City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 I have no objection for an interum use of the house on 7928 Eden Road fhi' office use. Yours truly, / 1 Calvin A. Anderson `la, t:f,. • c . Ol tlAY 2 1973 Hen-ITS Mfdwo:a,inc. May 2, 1978 Honorable Mayor Wolfgang Penzel and Eden Prairie City Council c/o ltoer Muted. City Manager 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Mayor: . Centex homes Midwest, Inc., requests the opportunity to address ' jointly the Eden Prairie City Council and the Eden Prairie Development Comunission in a special public hearing fur the purpose of presenting and discussing a development proposal for approximately Sb acres north of Starring Lake and east of Mitchc'.l Road. The reasons fot this request are first, Centex Homes develops lots esclasivrly for its own use and Centex also preselects and bonus eight (. ) different model hom 2s of its own design on those lots. These homes range in size from 975 square feet to 2000 sgnnrc feet. Under this method, we attempt to market . homes to a broad econctnic: income level by balancing house size, house type and lot size within a subdivision. Second, we believe that our marketing and building methods coupled .} with the geographical location and topography of the property preclude development under the existing zoning ordinance, either k-13.5 or PU1). Third, nor proposal will benefit the City of Eden Prairie by providing hoasint: eppurtuni.ty to a brooder household income level than would otherwise be possible; and fourth, will further benefit the city by having a large subdivision development and the marketing and buiidiug of hom.•s under the control of a builder/ developer with a national. reputation for quality and integrity. Centex Homes Midwest, Inc. appreciates the City Council's attention to this request and we look forward to a mutually beneficial. working relationship with the City of Eden Prairie. Sinccre1y, • CE 1:) HOMES I lOWEST, INC. Timothy R. Eller Assistant Vii•:-Ynrui sat Y 6601 Darnoll 1tA..Eden Prato,Mtnnoautd 55344!(G12)941 ti671 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-90 A RESOLUTION APPROVING P.E.R.A. FOR CETA EMPLOYEES BE IT RESOLVED that, effective with the first payday in April of 1978 the City of Eden Prairie will contribute the employer's share of P.E.R.A. for those CETA employees electing to become members of P.E.R.A. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this day of , 1978. Wolfgang U. Penzel, Mayor SEAL ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk J. 69 TO: Mayor and Council THRU: Roger Ulstad FROM: John Frane DATE: 5/8/78 RE: PERA membership for CETA employees Federal and state legislation has changed the requirement that CETA employees be members of PERA, however a CETA employee can elect to retain his mcaibcrship by paying both the —::ployee's (48) and employee's (5.5%) share of the cost. We presently have 14 employees under CETA contracts, 7 of which are considered permanent employees. Five of the permanent employees have indicated they wish to continue their PERA membership. Two have indicated a desire for withdrawal from PERA. The attached resolution would provide for the City to continue to contribute its share of the PERA cost. ,p 1 nvl/) 'approved Planning Commission -3- April 24, 1978 C. COR Investment Revised, request for PUD approval for office & multiple, rezoning from Planned Study to Office and RM 6.5 and preliminary plat approval for 1 apartment site, 48 duplexes, and 1 office site. A public hearing. The Planner informed the Commission the Council referred the project back to the Planning Commission and will be back to the Council on May 2nd. He reviewed the plan for 1 apartment site, 1 office site, and 48 duplexes, and stated the commercial sites have been eliminated. He added that the project would have to submit buffering and screening plans to be approved by the staff. He added the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission has reviewed the revised plans and reconmends a eight foot wide trail along Co.Rd. 4. Sundstrom inquired if the proponent concurs with the staff report. Mr. 8ruce Knutson, Bruce Knutson Architectsreplied affirmative. Sundstrom then asked why rezoning is not requested on the apartment site. Mr. Knutson replied they have no immediate user at this time. Sundstrom inquired why the proponent had not submitted grading plans. Mr. Knutson replied they wanted confirmation on uses proposed prior to investing in the cost of such plans. McCulloch asked how high the office building would be. Knutson replied two stories. Sundstrom asked how soon construction would begin. Knutson replied as soon as approval is received from the City. He added they have already received access approval from the County Highway Department. Levitt inquired how many units may be in the apartment building. Knutson estimated 48 units with underground parking. • Sundstrom asked if anyone in the audience had questions or comments. None were raised. Motion 1: McCulloch moved, Retterath seconded , to close the public hearing on COR Investment Revised Plat. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 2: McCulloch moved, Levitt seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the COR POO for office and multiple uses according to the plan dated April 4, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 3: McCulloch moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Planned Study to RM 6.5 for 48 duplexes, and rezoning from Planned Study to Office for 1 office lot according to the plat submitted and dated April 4, 1978, and contingent upon the staff reports of Jan. 18 and April 19, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. 0,)1 1 rat/jtt 5/12/78 •-�`� Raven Ridge CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 182Zi P1N COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 78-25 AN ORDINANCE REIJ1'TING TO ZONING AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as follows: That portion of Outlot V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the northwesterly corner of Outlot V and lying on the easterly right of way line of Edenvale Boulevard; thence South 70 Degrees 10 Minutes 03 Seconds East a distance of 422.64 feet; thence South 42 Degrees 30 Minutes 00 Seconds East a distance of 135.00 feet; thence South 09 Degrees 30 Minutes 00 Seconds hest a distance of 135.00 feet; thence South 18 Degrees 30 I'LnutPs 00 Seconds East, approximately 237.00 feet to the South line of Outlot V and there terminating. ALSO That part of Outlot V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, lying easterly of the atx ve described line, which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone and shall be included hereafter in the RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 zones respectively. Section 2. The above described property shall. be subject to the teams and conditions of that certain rezoning agreement dated , 1978 entered .into between Edenvale, Incorporated and the City of Men Prairie, which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City relating to such RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 zones. Section 3. This ordinance beocnrs effective from and after its passage and publication. rt • /012 FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this day of _, 1978 and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City m the day of , 1978. Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor nrrLuf: John D. Frane, City Clerk Published in the Eden Praia?News on the day of _ , 1978. P. `y1 j -2- Raven Ridge 5/5/78 REZONING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into in triplicate this day of • 1978 by and between EDENVALE, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation hereinafter referred to as "Owner", and the City of Eden Prairie a municipal coporation hereinafter referred to as "City", • • WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner has requested City to change zoning for 13 acre site from Rural to RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 for development of land more fully • described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, and WHEREAS, Dwner agrees to develop the aforementioned property in consider- ation of the City's changing of the zoning, and Dwner further agrees as a part of said consideration it will lay out, develop; and maintain such project as herein- after set forth. • NOW , THEREFORE, this Agreement witnesseth that for and in consideration of the Mayor and City Council adopting Ordinance 78-25 changing the zoning from • • Rural to RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 , the Owner agrees to construction on said property in accordance with the planning, architectural, engineering, and landscaping requirements of all City Ordinances and will submit development stage plans to the City subject to the following conditions: • I. Owner agrees to develop said land as described in Exhibit A as 22 single family lots and 6 townhouse lots(24 units) as submitted by the Owner and approved by the City attached hereto as Exhibit 8.dated Jan.,1978. 2. Owner shall plat a 9 foot radius along property lines at all street intersections and cul-de-sacs returns to provide sufficient ROW for utility installations. 3. Owner shall submit a finalized development plan prior to final plat approval which shall show proposed grading, storm water drainage area and direction of flow, preliminary utility plans, ponding and floodplain high water levels for 1OD year storm,and minimum floor elevations for all lots, subject to City Engineering Department approval. Rezoning Agreement-Raven Ridge page 2 • 4. Owner agrees to excavate all organic soils near the townhouse site and backfill with a coarse, granular material to provide suitable building pads. 5. Owner agrees to follow Riley/Purgatory Creek Watershed District reconuendations and regulations on soil erosion control measures during all utility, road, and home construction to prevent excessive soil loss. Ground cover shall be established in all disturbed areas immediately following construction. 6. Owner shall construct a berm along with tree plantings to screen the townhouse parking areas from Edenvale Boulevard. Also, Owner shall provide additional shrub and tree plantings between the existing Hipp's Cedar Point Townhouses and the proposed town- houses as a visual buffer. All berm and landscape planting plans shall be submitted to the City Landscape Architect for review and approval and be consistent with Ord. 178 . 7. City grants approval of 3.05 overall density for the Raven Ridge project based upon the plan attached hereto as Exhibit B. 8. City grants approval of the following setback variances: 5' garage to side lot line 10' 1 and 1' story house to side lot line. 30' front of building to front lot line, except 25' on cul-de-sacs 20' rear of house to rear lot line ' 20' side yard setback for houses built on corner lots, but not conflicting with 30' setbacks on adjacent lots. 9. Owner agrees to construct a pedestrian pathway,at the time of project construction, consistent with the Edenvale Pathway Standards and the location outlined in the attached plan, labeled and attached hereto as Exhibit B. I7a • Rezoning Agreement-Raven Ridge page 3 • 10. That the City Engineer's reports be complied with and that all sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities , concrete curb and gutter and bituminious surfacing, whether to be public or private, shall be designed to city standards by a Registered Y. Professional Civil Engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. The Owner, through his engineer,shall provide for competent daily inspection of all street and utility construction both public and private. Asbuilt drawings with service and valve ties on reproducable mylar and certification of completion and compliance with specifications shall also be delivered to the City Engineer. The Owner also agrees to pay all fees for City Engineer and administrative services consistent with current City j. requirements. 11. . That Owner agrees to develop said property in conformance with the plat dated Jan., 1978 attached hereto as Exhibit B. And Owner agrees to promptly file this Agreement with the Register of Deeds • and supply the City Clerk with a copy of this Agreement with infor- mation as to Document Number and date and time of filing duly certified thereon within 60 days from the date of said agreement. 12. That if Owner fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement 1, within 24 months and provide proof of filing in accordance with I' paragraph #11 herein, Owner for itself, its successors, and assigns agrees that it will not oppose a rezoning of the property back to Rural. 13. That the property Dwner agrees to comply with all applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, and laws of the City of Eden Prairie. 14. That the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the property herein described. 616 • • Rezoning Agreement-Raven Ridge page 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to he executed the day and year aforesaid. . CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota BY: Its Mayor, Wolfgang H. Penzel BY: Its Manager, Roger K. Ulstad • EDENVAIE INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation of the State of Minnesota 1 --- Its& BY: Its STATE OF`MINNESOTA) )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1978 by Wolfgang Penzel , the Mayor and by Roger Ulstad, the City Manager—orthe City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) : SUSAN L REDDIN�= Norm,f IA tlC—MINNESOTA )SS. HENNEPIN COONEY COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) MY Commons..,>.,„.DEC./1,1Dl4 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this/, c day of �� 1978 by4z i ¢u,� - the _ c s«.�t _and by ---(j of Edenvale Incorporated. .,/` 2 tiff) la .-'-..i1:.l�i • RM 6.5 Portion • That portion of Outlot V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line: • Beginning at the northwesterly corner of Outlot V and lying on the easterly right of way line of Edenvale Boulevard; thence South 70 Degrees 10 Minutes 03 Seconds Fast a distance of 422.64 feet; thence South 42 Degrees 30 Minutes 00 Seconds Fast a distance of 135.00 feet; thence South 09 Degrees 30 Minutes 00 Seconds West a distance of 135.00 feet; thence South 18 Degrees 30 Minutes 00 Seconds East, approximately 237.00 feet to the south line of Outlot V and there terminating. RM 13.5 Portion That part of Outlot V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, lying easterly of the above described line. EXHBIT A Raven Ridge Rezoning Agreement 111./ � c '/ • • j.:::•-' \ .N, . .4,A,11, . ; 1 i / 4'.:,..;„.7.7--t--- 6 \ `� �� 'Mir �1 .'1'\.1 77 `� e .(/// . „ // '>.. -/ I + / f ) _ q" £r:`\ • to 4 is �/ i I I \ i I tP/S 1 1 , •I Alin N � . ..,4 to ! :k i :.,,,,\ ��-- \ c ) ------...„ i 1--..-_ I Afs'117t0N \ \ it- \-i-0--,.- \ ------..17.. "?? ,. 1; -2 ,!. ., . ... \., ..,, _.„ \k , ...7,. 1.... .----,--_____i, \ ,! (.....% , N\\.: • k‘ •\ .'_,-.-- .''''' '\, V j :: ' • N / .\-\.6\ ' '''s) ,e'''Y \T''. s \ \A _ .‘ ..i' • •�'< of `\I �' II j �, !DiNVAt£ . 104 ADDITION \ \\ \ . PRELIMINARY PLAT • • RAVEN RIDGE I... IN, • N.1.,*.I.• . BY EDENVALE ,2-1 J • May 16, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-96 RESOLUTION FOR ACQUISITION OF • UTILITY EASEMENT, I.C. 51-300 WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City to acquire certain permanent and temporary easements across Lot 4, Block 1 Eden View Addition in order to • provide sewer and water stubs to the adjoining lot to the south, and WHEREAS, the City believes that the compensation rate (over $8.00 per sq. ft.) requested by the owner of said Lot 4, far exceeds any damages incurred by the easement acquisition, and WHEREAS, similar easements have been acquired under this project at much lower rates ($0.275 per sq. ft. for permanent and $.02 for temporary easement) NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED that the City Attorney of the City of Eden Prairie proceed immediately with the necessary action pursuant to • Chapter I17, Minnesota Statutes, through power of eminent domain to condemn the necessary easement as below described and further that the City Attorney, ,i the City Manager and the staff of the City of Eden Prairie be authorized to take the necessary steps in compliance with the provisions of Section f I17.042 to secure possession of said easement at the earliest possible date. EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A 15.DD foot permanent easement and a 3D.00 foot temporary • construction easement for utility installation and maintenance purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 4, Block 1, Eden View, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows: Said permanent easement being 7.50 feet to the right and 7.50 feet to the left of the following described line. and said temporary construction easement being 15.00 feet to the right and I5.00 feet to the left of said following described line. Said line is described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Lot 4; thence Easterly along the South line of said Lot 4 a distance of 65.00 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence Northerly, deflecting to the left I06 degrees 49 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 28.00 feet more or less to the West line of said lot 4 and said line there terminating. . i «•(.J Said temporary construction easement to expire on or before December 31, 1978. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk /'L 0 J LI La• LA Q , ` LJJ o ud lJ �� CA W v O E— �t } cf> J L 4 CO J w -Y �,. p O a� a CD I sn. _ ta CC d G. > a. D tl. CJ co I— o� o N H L.,O 2 O O_-1 u ¢ r`� _ - ` 1` z i1 9. tit` Z W —. QI- Y pt at 9_� yZa r \�.e . YLJQO_ d 0 �' '� ,_ ! d Of I- sd 4 CC C W 2 ►',•"N N WF- Li . _ bus »' 1 0 M v Z U) a LAi, K I 1. �. ft V r- Cr 0 v 3 N n l rti(cc • LAW OFFICES PERBIX, HARVEY. SIMONS & THORFINNSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 17 TENTH AVE.SOUTH HOPKINS.MINN. 035-4458 W.HARLAN PERSIX IIS22-I977) HOWARD E. HARVEv MAILING ADDRESS: KEITH E. SIMONS P. O. BOX 100 ROSE L. THORFINNSON HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 May 9, 1978 • Mr. Roger Ulstad, City Manager City of Eden Prairie • 8950 Eden Prairie Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Ulstad: • As a result of the questions raised at the Council meeting on May 2, 1978 I have revioded the entire Rezoning Agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and Condon Naegle Realty Company. It is my opinion that under the Rezoning Agreement entered into between the parties there is a provision contained in paragraph 1 subparagraph A on page 2 which gives the • City Council the power to review its action of rezoning the property to determine whether the concept and developmental plans of the owners are still consistent with the development plans of the City. There is no ;s requirement that there be a review of this type until such time as the City Council has reason to question whether said plans are still consistent with developeent plans of the City. This event would only occur under the following conditions: 1. That more than two years have transpired since the signing • of the Rezoning Agreement which is dated August 3, 1976. 2. That the City has made a change in its development plan which would require a review to see whether the plans of the owners are still. consistent with the new development plans of the City. Any change in development plans by the owners would, of course, require consideration by the City Council under the normal procedure for submission of new PUD concept and developmental plans. The zoning of C Regional Service would be retained but upon such an application the City could well decide to deny the application if for any reason the new PUD concept fails to carply with the developmentil plans of the City. PERBIX. HARVEY, SIMONS &THORFINNSON. P.A. Mr. Roger Ulstad, City Manager Page 2 May 9, 1978 The net effect of the clause as I see it is to give the City the power in the event that no development work is commenced within the two year period to make a change in the City's developmental plans and to require the submission of new PUD concept and developmental plans consistent with the change in the City's plans. In other words it freezes the City's developmental plans on this property for two years. It does not give the City the option of rezoning to other than C Regional Service but it does • give it the option of changing its concept as to how the C Regional Service zoning should be developed by the owner of the property. No purpose would be served at this time by a review of this matter by the City Council. This would only become pertinent in the event the City Council makes the determination that a change should be made in the develop, mental plan for this area. R, Sincerely, PERBIX, HARVEY, SIMONS & THORFINNSCN, P.A. • Ross).. Thorfinnson/ RLT:jh • • • aig III lltl ItLi league of minnesota cities May 2, 1978 "`O: itaycrs, Managers and Administrators of All Member Cities FROM: League of Minnesota Cities Over the pas' couple of years, many Minnesota cities have experienced difficuities in obtaining insurance at a reasonable cost. In some instan:es. certain coverages have been unavailable at any cost: The Board of Directors must soon make a decision cn whether to attempt to create an alternative to the convent.i:,nal purchase of insurance from r.cmmer.-ial companies, if it is found to be feasible to do sc This alternative ...: l,t take the form of a joint self-insurance system, a captive (League-owned) insurance company, a servi"e contract with a commercial insurer, etc This would, of course, be a major undertaking, in terms of both time and money For this; reason we need to have a firm indication of the need and cries` interest in ouch a proposal before going ahead. In order 4,i he able tr proceed, it will he necessary to have reliable irt.'mation on loss experience in Minnescta cities For this reason, cities indicating that they wish the League to proceed with the project will be expo'ted to onoperate in furniohtng the necessary data (Cities • which furnished premium and loss data for the survey conducted in the spring of 1977 would, of course, be asked only to update those data. ) Because of budget limitations, it is possible that. the heague would not be able to finance such a project entirely through League funds If this should be the case, the only apparent alternative would be to request • a contribution from cities whs. would be directly benefited by the project. • For these reasons, we are requesting each city council to consider and respond to the following: (OVER) 1.21.1( g 300 hriniivnr building 400 cedar etrnot. nnint.pool. minnesota 55101 (612)222-2861 1 fi - 2 - 't LIABILITY/PROPERTY INSURANCE Yes No 1. The City of agrees that the League should attempt to create an alternative to the conventional ,cmmerciai insurance market, and further agrees to cooperate with the League in supplying such information as may be required. Yes No 2. The City of would be willing to contribute an amount not to exceed $100 toward establishment of an alternative to the conventional c_mmeroial insurance market. (It is understood that any requested contribution would be pro-rated a ording to size of city, and that contributions would be taken into account in establishing rates. ) HEALTH INSURANCE d Yes No 3. Some cities have indicated an interest in having the League attempt to set up a system to make health insuran'-e available at group rates to ,E cities with :mall numbers of employees. This . might be a^<omplished either through joint purchase of insurance or through a joint self- insured plan. Should the League pursue this possibility? Please return this questionnaire as soon as possible after your city council has had a chance to consider and resp)nd to these question_ The address is: , League of Minnesota Cities 1 300 H never Building 480 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Thank you very much for your cooperation in your L-ague's activities. } PST:ch 5/2/78 r-1 DICKEY / KODET / ARCHITECTS / INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE ARTHUR H.DICKEY.A.I.A. PLANNING EDWARD J.KODET,JR..A.I.A. INTERIORS WAYNE A.JESKE,C.S.I. May 11, 1978 Mr. Roger Ulstad City of Eden Prairie 7905 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: Addition to existing fire station Fire station, County Road 4 and Valley View Road Fire station, 78th Street and Highway 169 Dear Mr. Ulstad: We have received and opened bids for the above projects and recommend entering into J contract with the low bidder, C.O. Field Company, as follows: Base Bid $ 529,900.00 Accept Alternate A-1 17,600.00 Contract sum $ 547,500.00 Attached is a summary of the bids. The alternate items are as follows: A-1 Add brick to the County Road 4 and Valley View station A-2 Add brick to the 78th Street and Highway 169 station A-3 Add sprinkler system to all three building projects If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, aor04 •thur H. Dickey, A.I.A. / AHU:cgj vv Enc. 4930 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH / MINNEAPOLIS / MINNESOTA /S5410 / (612)920.3993 AAYl0. 1�'Id (TdI:8� CmoTUCTlm8l» mnuATIG,! � FOR: � Ff:. xrTr� ' �--C r: A.y__-__-____- � —'------------'--- - � ` | � $ 583,838.00 / $546.00.00 ' $529,900.00 i UM: --- 220 210 180 5% | 5% | 5% HUNlNGHELSON ---'------ --`=~~``~~-^^--7--------------'-- -----'---' PASE_��»/ _ i $�9,O0O.Oo $ 08.000.oO + 4,000.00 ' +l/.0o.oO ! � + 4,000.00 +|/.�m oO ������� - ' CoyouTpLl J � 5% � 5% | IVI: _-'--_'_-_'__- _---_-�_-____-__-_-_-_L- � ` � M� / . May 11, 1978 TO: Roger Ulstad FROM: Jack Hacking SU8JECT: Fire Department Building Program Attached is a summary by John Frane concerning our present financial position on the building program for the fire department. It is my personal opinion that we should have brick on the station at !' Round Lake and try to get by with something less than brick on the 169 station. In looking at John's balance sheet, if we have brick on both stations, this will leave us with a balance of $24,800.00 to accomplish the following items; rescue truck, grass rig, staff car, landscaping, furniture, fire hose, some equipment for the new trucks and several miscellaneous items. I have talked with Mr. Dickey and he will be recommending an alternate to brick for the 169 station in the way of a block that looks like brick. He will he prepared to discuss this on Tuesday evening. If you have any questions, please call me. • BUDGET ENCUMBERED BALANCE SPENT BUILDINGS $5B4,000 $ 35,000 $549,000 } TWO PUMPERS 165,000 158,100 6,900 AERIAL TRUCK 215,000 215,000 RESCUE TRUCK 20,000 20,000 GRASS FIRE TRUCK 8,000 8,000 STAFF VEHICLE 6,000 6,000 $998,000 $408,100 $589,900 • BALANCE A3Pur $589,900 $5B9,900 $589,900 LESS BASE BID 529,900 529,900 529,900 BRICK (1) 17,600 17,600 BRCCK (2) 17,600 BALANCE $T 60,000 -42,400 $-2,1i800 x9 LAW OFFICES • PERBIX, HARVEY. SIMONS 8c THORFINNSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 17 TENTH AVE.SOUTH HOPKINS.MINN. 035-4468 W.HARIAN PE11121K 11022-1077) MAILING ADDRESS: HOWARO E. HARV¢v KEITH E. SIMOnl, P. O. BOX 100 Rose L.THORFINNSON HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 May 11, 1978 Mr. Roger Ulstad, City Manager City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55343 Dear Mr. Ulstad: In response to your request I have reviewed Ordinance No. 135, Section 2, Subd. 2.7 - Special Requirements pertaining to Design. This Subdivision provides as follows: "All sites and structures within all Districts except the Rural R1-22 and R1-13.5 shall be developed in accordance with plans and specificat.iuns prepared by a registered professional landsca;_:. or building architect respectively. Exterior building finishes in these Districts shall consist of materials comparable in grade and quality to the following: 1) Face brick. 2) Natural stone. 3) Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture. 4) Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel con- struction, if the panel materials be any of those named above, glass, prefinished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron) or plastic. The Village Manager or his designated representative shall review all proposals to determine if they comply with the provisions of thi section. If he is of the opinion that a particular proposal does not so conform he shall refer the matter to the Board of Appeals for a decision." The critical question would appear to pertain to precast concrete units under Item 3) which provides: "Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with • an applied decorative material or texture." Obviously, the first question to consider is whether a cement block building is a specially designed precast concrete unit. There is some question as to whether it would or would not be. As to precast concrete units of the type being used extensively in building con- Mr. Roger Ulstad, City Manager City of Eden Prairie j #2 struction now, the obvious intent of this Section would be to require that there be some treatment of the surface with a decorative material or texture that it integrated into the concrete precast unit in such a way as to make an attractive exterior building finish. In light of the use of the phrase "precast concrete unit", it is entirely logical to conclude that this does not permit the use of a concrete block-type structure as the exterior building surface in areas other than rural R1-22 and R1-13.5 since it certainly is not customary to refer to concrete block walls as precast concrete units. I would recommend a careful review of this matter and consideration as to whether the Ordinance is acceptable in its present form or • whether some modification 'hould be made in these provisions in the Ordinance. Sincerely, Rods L. Thorfinnspn RLT/a t I r. I I 1 May 16. 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-95 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A HEARING (I.C. 51-320) WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the City Council on May 16, recommending the following improvements to wit: I.C. 51-320, Sanitary sewer extension for the Eden Road area NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant ). to M.S.A. Sect. 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 7th day of June, 1978, at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Hall. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John 0. Frane, Clerk • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION FOR THE EDEN ROAD AREA I.C. 51-320 I, +Ii b fi f y INDEX CDVER INDEX - CERTIFICATION REPORT CONTEXT PROJECT COST SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT SCHEDULE PLATE I RECOMMENDED SEWER ALIGNMENT PLATE II ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE FORM 'i. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or ! under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Carl J. Jullie, P.E. Reg. No. 9323 FEASIBILITY REPORT CONTEXT 1.C. 51-315 I. INTROOUCTION The purpose of this report is to present to the City Council an examination of the feasibility of Improvement Project 51-320 in terms of the nature and scope of the proposed construction, estimated project costs, assessment rates and scheduling data. This study was authorized by the City Council on Feb. 7, 1978, per Council Resolution NO. 78-29. Four property owners within the project area have petitioned for sewer service. The most immediate need for service relates • to the proposed AMOCO service station at T.H. 169 on Tract 0, RLS #1449, • which, according to the owners, is scheduled for construction concurrent with the proposed sanitary sewer installation. There are several single family homes within the proposed project limits along Eden Road. Only two of these homeowners have petitioned for service at this time, and therefore some local opposition to the project can be expected. Assessment deferments for the homesteaded property owners could help minimize the impact on the local homeowners. Watermain, storm sewer and street improvements within the project area should be considered at some future time when additional development ap- plications and rezonings are approved which will require these facilities. II. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER Ii The alignment and assessment area for the proposed sanitary sewer lines are shown on attached Plate I. The alignment extends southerly from the exist- - 1 - ing 10" sewer on Parcel 500, to Eden Road, thence following Eden Road to just north of Centergate Road. Also, an 8' lateral would be extended easterly along Tract B to serve the AMOCO site. Service stubs would be extended at appropriate locations. Street restoration would be limited to 6" of gravel base. An alternate alignment as shown on Plat II was also reviewed. This alter- nate is not recommended because the cost would be $12,000 more than the recommended plan and also R/W acquisition could be a problem. The estimated cost for the improvement is $73,000. The City also has a previously incurred cost of $34,700, which covers the assessed cost of the existing 10" sewer along W. 18th St. which serves as the outfall for this project. The pro,oesed lateral assessment rate for the project is $2,720 per acre. This rate is based upon the rate to other parcels north of Eden Road in 19i7 for similar service. It is proposed that these lots within the project limits which are homesteaded will oe charged the city's standard trunk and lateral assessment rates at time of hook-up. However, at such time that any of these residential parcels would he reconed to some other use, then the ij. per-acre rate of $4,740, plus interest at Ba (But not exceeding 5u% of the principal), would be applied at that time, less any previous lateral assess- ments The proposed 1978 standard trunk and lateral assessments for single tamily lots are as follows: Trunks: $520 per lot (if platted prior to 6/22/71) Otherwise il2,O60 per acre Lateral sewer: $3,000 per lot ($2,420 it lot was developea prior to 5/22/71) - 2 - • These rates would apply if the homesteaded parcels were hooked up and assessed this year. The following pages show the preliminary assessment roll and project schedule for the proposed improvements. III. FEASIBILITY The sanitary sewer improvement proposed herein under I.C. 51-320 is feasible } 1 and will benefit the properties proposed to be assessed. i • ./ 1 I - 3 1, I PROJECT COST SUMMARY Construction 62,400 Consulting Engineering (12%) 7,500 City Engineering and Administrative costs (9%) 5,600 Capitalized Interest (4%) 2,500 Total 78,000 Previously Incurred City Costs 34,700 Total 112,700 • • 4,0 O SD O W O N O J •CC COIn 0 to CO IC. O 01 CO I— I I I N. N N 1 O M I M 1 O O 1 I I in .O 1, 1 M N 1 4,0 ti I V h' I I 1 cl• I r• 1 an O. I ct N U J Z 0 0 0 0 a O N O Q W O K X N 4- u- 4- CO to 0 4- to CO UO 4- ct M 4• CO W N n y d (1) M N N 01 O cf ill 01 LO .-L 01 41' 1-N •• O O C 10 4,0 N. O M ch us C us O1 C ch Q W N N N •-L N N •"• J N+" N L •C) L W O v1 O V1 O O V1 VI N N VI • V) Z N 4- 4- L O N O 4- 01 O O > 0/ 01 4• 0) J O V) N 01 •.- ct H 0 N V1 O CO O1 1/1 VI 01 V1 J CC W CI C r0 01 V1 O O VI CO CO O 1/1 1/1 O N O 1-V) 0_ •-•L Q N Q •••L •-L Q Q Q tY GC a W • 3. ttl N O W(V V)M W Q•--1 C]V) in Q W 10 ct .O 1, M O c, co O ct M in 10 •••i Ln >. N K V 1n V) 01 N O CO ct O1 O1 O N. M O 10 Q • L•)Q •1 l0 •H in M •-L •H Z•-• V1 N a J W CC O_ Y 01 C C .0 '0 VI ro 10 — 0 Q1 N ' C C O A E S. N Cq N 7 i C cc K N as >, >, CO U U 1n v C .0 0) 0 4J O 10 •0 7 C.) 4-) 0 V1 i L CO COJ i 6 W f f LN 1/1 W W O C E 01 1r K •0 I 1 L -0 0_ b Cr) 0 C S. S.W .F1 . . i 0) 0) N • C/ • U Q L X st)t •EE0 10 EE) 0/ 4-i 4- O L L9 C O1- C tl u . E - C C O — +a q .C5- LI) CC CO CO 3 Z 2 Q 3 u J 3 LL (.3 an O O O O an O LC) a O LC) O O N CI O el1 O1 .-1 VI .. L0 N. SO • v .�i l• ...• >- 01 01 a 1- N. Q m U C W G CO klj Q U O N CO a-. N WL0 d-1 M •-L d-1 • U • O N A • CC -1 S.- Q 0 CC I- CC CC 1- I13`) • I • a O O • O CD 4.0 -i Q1/40 o v I- 1 1 I I 1 Ir n V O 1 1 1 , , r J Z Q W LI V. 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- O W N y y N 10 O/ N y4- W p O O O O E O JN [O ',� en 4 t� O N N tti t•fl iJ N N i0 X U! OJ in pf 3 Z y C C S..Z W NI V) 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- VI 4! 12 N N N OJ 0) Q 6! '� _CI-N O O O O O N C iJ I. Q > c 0 N 2N In Vl 0) YI OJ L iJ N O m+J+J W K C J N NL) CO N. N. C) N. C) CI.CO N LO 5 W G O� Y m OJ :. N O 3 L Q t CL N L O.0 •.'N y1 .N n N .N C `n 3 w U U N 4- 03 V S. O O. C C T' 0 3 0) N. m 4_ 4-Y U N .0 3 i . O L VI C m u N E 4- U .-Ci C 014- O E of 3 CU K K C /L C L J7 L•.- �, U ti� 0 a • 2 C a' 0 10_T W Y_CC CC .t) 7 t C •0 4, i Q N z X Y r. d 1,; r E L 4,O.lo- OF- a i 4, i .C. VI U N N' 0 N f0 N 0 0 C QL.- K W S CO 7 01-- 0 T O• V) u 1 v T_ 3 O Q 0 •0 Q to •N. o m O..o .-a .-, LO CO > -' m O. .-1 N N N N Y , F. n Is- CO I.- vl •U c ... v v v 0- C L L +. y LO Q CO d 2 VI O. K ON • II O. CO U O. IX m U v . V) i O. Ir 1- N 13cx) - 25°qlf .___.—•- ' h- T� a161Ta • �J , V1 l y� n.ir°2. O'CO+IJ" (500) _ 1'! • 1 L•.Q}II\ • i 1 (AERIAL PHOTO 1967) — I oN \ I L A • K E„�o—r 1 as ,�J... o- j P 0 1I n � . .e., hR. . S. "N I t c + j . 41, 1' Q / . •u ..a Z / 1 7i f 7 0 o w 20 ~ ,{+, - NO. \895, y- • II _ c.' s .4 -411,i. " ,,o a N .1 rya I m .a. .act. ° o 1 \ %\� l t {�fY J - — �� -- `9—_—_- o.-- ``Q m I it,•(ql5`'� -- V er P ,p. Port of Lot 18 ems` Vie, , '\ 72 oar j r II �, / t';°�,�r N - 700 R. L. S. •N v° w 1 8� ZCt. 12 —.�E$S f'1,ENT �°wNOARy—T•7; ,y^,w NO. . •`^ • ` / •1) .. O-^ - -- + - - •,•-ec33` .are tay i.ii 1▪c -- v iet ti;;" CO2 eS,e 1 fI CO V i•010 •, e/ / ,�•$' , Er PL. ATE I 1,.... Laa i '� ' %�.;`z z ,,RL.S otte) / r4 `-" • ... No.369" r ' IPELOp1MEWDEO SAW. ■ .q 1 i_\.,I� t -n SEWER ALI6N r MEN ro O ::.re 1. .1;•.",,rc• Zi..C...r o 0,0 .,. ..k'..,.,..••-.i'y/•y' aE:.nE ;P W .>. 16 a<1/" • - CENTER N D C. • + mo I I° o t(�•t, .?4 �' - t ice— —� �' i 7 A 4.07'1 • A.0.00!0' ,a 7,fit 0 ) L•.4!!l\ .Y' / � 1` A '/.may (AERIAL PHOTO 19671 ?- \ 1 I L A K E„ 1 • t Nis1 • j, ) I° 1 • 1*flitC": s me;in'' Il.°If: ."1,/‘ Zi . 1- N0. 895`= :s.5so.,• , i ;31 _3! a -----.`--i+i—-—`£ ,01 .n..{�- t 1 y. ,r is ,', ' st C ■.I - °°Sr a:•(\ - { • yyy T / � --k Y ` e`L5� y. vVO12 \\ Porl of lof 18 R (72/7), ,V 6711.3L Ea,t {J�'.� i� l II ��"t 1 J • - r i t00• ! R. L. S. - / "t WI O t $,/= 112 1" / —RCS I'SS MLt✓Y�IJNMRY ..._ ,yqN� NL«�Y /� / � q. .•a. ., cA\V_ •'1'•aai- ^R . •..1�/ ..' 'NI' .l L00 .'' 1 •9 3! A , 12 a m" : I ,a.,144 D i' %/a;r, Er ::o - , `t ;�= tt� ,RL.S. , (41'o' /• - PLATE SC �,_4 cf -No.369" 11 *`.5*/' a RNAYE QwIGNmINr ., r '1 ''I f ,�.,. '1 f w/� viv . ,.or 0 .•Y: (hit•) t. k''� • CENTER B. j 1 _, , 1 -- — -- -- 3 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE s NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSEu PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS 1.C. 51-32U • TO WHOM IT MAY LONCERN: NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN that the Eden Prairie City Council will meet in the Lity Hail Council Chambers, 895u Eden Prairie Road, • at 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday, June 7, 1978, to consider the making of the following described improvements: i.C. 51-320, Trunk and lateral sewer improve- ments to serve those properties abutting Eden Road from T.H. i69 to Centergate Road and Those properties lying between Eden Road and T.H. 169. The total estimated project cost is $112,700, which includes $34,700 of previously incurred City costs. Pursuant to Minnesota State Laws Section 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvements is all that property within or abutting on the above describes limits. Written and oral continents relating to the proposed improvements will be reviewed at this meeting. By Order of the city Council Kathy Hermann, Deputy City Clerk City of Eden Prairie 895U Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Publisn: May 19 ana 31, 1978 • '9.0, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSEu ti PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS I.C. 51-32U `' TO WHOM 1T MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IJ HEREBY GIvEN that the Eden Prairie City Council will meet in the City Hail Council Chambers, 895U Eden Prairie Road, at 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday, June 7, 1976, to consider the making of the following described improvements: I.C. 51-320, Trunk and lateral sewer improve- ments to serve those properties abutting Eden Road from T.H. 169 to Centergate Road and Those properties lying between Eden Road and T.H. 169. The total estimated project cost is $112,700, which includes $34,700 of previously incurred City costs. Pursuant to Minnesota State Laws Section 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvements is all that • property within or abutting on the above describea limits. Written and oral comments relating to the proposed improvements will be reviewed at this meeting. By Order of the City Council Kathy Hermann, Deputy City Clerk City of Eden Prairie ' 895U Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Publish: May 19 ana 31, 19i8 jll PROJECT SCHEDULE I.C. 51-320 5/16/78 Present feasibility report to City Council. 5/19/78 Mail Notice of Hearing to Eden Prairie Community News. Publish 5/24 and 5/31. 5/19/78 Mail Notice of Hearing to Public. 6/7/78 Hold Public Hearing, order improvement and preparation of plans and specifi- cations. 6/20/78 Approve plans and specifications and order Advertisement for Bids. • 6/23/7B Mail Advertisement for Bids to Eden Prairie Community News and Construction Bulletin. Publish 6/30 and 7/7 7/13/78 Open bids. 7/18/78 Award Contract. 10/1/78 Complete construction. • 10/78 Special Assessment Hearing it 1 1303 MEMO • TO: Mayor Penzel and Member of the City Council FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: May 16, 1978 SUBJECT: Transportation Projects The following is an updated listing of various local street and highway improvements which have been reviewed by staff and given priority designa- tiona. Preliminary cost estimates are also noted, together with projected special assessments to abutting properties and the net share to come from MSA funds and a general tax levy. PRIORITIES (A) Project has been given preliminary or final approval and should proceed as planned. (B) Important project which should proceed within 1-3 years. (C) Project can be delayed 3-5 years without serious impact. Special TOTAL assessment Net City & COST x $1,000 MSA Share x $1,000 (A) 1. I-494/T.H. 169 ramps, (D.O.T.) 94 # signals & R-W (A) 2. Co. Rd. 1/T.H. 169 Signal (D.O.T.) 15 (A) 3. Vo-Tec/T.H. 169 Signal (D.O.T.) 15 (A),. 4. Acquire R/W - Valley View 35 35 Rd. connection to Co. Rd. 18 (A) 5. W. 78th St./T.H. 5 Signal (D.O.T.) 15 (B) 6. Dell Road & Valley View 584 353 231 Rd. thru Edengate & Maple Leaf Acres (B) 7. Valley View Rd. Hidden 1,000 161 839 Ponds to Co. Road 4 (B) 8. Valley View Rd. Mitchell 1,060 476 584 Rd. to T.N. 5 & to I-494 (B) 9. Anderson Lakes Parkway 250 65 185 Connection, Lake Eden & The Preserve - 2 - Special TOTAL Assessment Net City & COST x $1,000 MSA share x $1,000 (C) 10. Anderson Lakes Parkway 1,850 391 1,459 T.H. 169 to Mitchell Rd. (B) 11. Widen T.N. 169/I-494 (D.O.T.) Bridge & 4 lanes on T.H. 169 to Co. Rd. 39 (C) 12. Schooner Blvd./I-494 ramps 1,424 1,424 8 conn. to W. 78th St. (C) 13. Schooner Blvd. T.N. 169 500 220 280 to T.N. 5 • (B) 14. W. 78th St. Schooner Blvd. 110 69 41 to T.H. 169 (Widen to 4 lanes) (A) 15. Baker/Mitchell Rd. Connec- (Henn. Co.) tion to Co. Rd. 60 • (C) 16. Co. Rd. 60/I-494 ramps (Henn. Co.) (C) 17. rnlley View Rd. Railroad (D.O.T.) 100 Bridge in Edenvale (B) 18. Assume unassessed debt to ' 500 500 date for Schooner Blvd. Total A & B projects 3,539 1,124 2,415 The attached memo (5/1/78) from John Frane indicates that a combination of • special assessments, MSA bonding and a 1.5 mill levy could provide the • range of 4.8 to 5.4 million in funds for road improvements. Accordingly, it appears feasible to transfer one or more of the "C" projects into the "B" category. CJJ:kh f 3vS TO: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: John D. Frane, Finance Director DATE: May 1, 1978 RE: Road Financing Our previous analysis indicated a 1 mill levy together with special assessments of $1,000,000 and state aid bonds of $1,000,000 would provide for $3,300,000 of road improvements. As an alternative a 122 mill levy, special assessments of $1,500,000 and state aid bonds of $1,900,000 would provide $5,400,000. If special assessments were to remain in the $1,000,000 range then $4,800,000 would be provided. JDF:bq 5/117u !BOLO