Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/02/1978 (7 I-- j JOHN FRANE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNC L TUESDAY, MAY 2, 1978 7:3D PM, CITY HALL • COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, • Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Ross Thorfinnson; Planner Chris Enger; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; Engineer Carl Juilie; and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE DF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL • I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. CONSENT CALENDAR (One motion to approve all items on the Coi.sent • Calendar) A. Set P lic Hearing for Tamarac Addition by Edenvale for Page 951 June 1978 R. Set PUT:Wearing for Olympic Hills, Outlot B, 1st Addition, Page 952 for Jun 6. 1978 C. Set '•:lic Hearing for Olympic Hills. Fifth Addition, for Page 953 JunI 1978 B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-16, rezoning approximately 1.5 Page 954 acre site from Rural to Public located east of future Hennepin County Library and north of Schooner Boulevard E. Final plat approval for Amsden Hills II (Resolution No. 78-83) Page 955 F. Final plat approval for Golf Vista Addition (Resolution No. 78-84) Page 958 G. Final plat approval for The Meadows 2nd Addition (Resolution No. Page 961 1. 78-85) N. Designation of new MSA Street Mileage on portion of Schooner Page 964 Boulevard and Dell Road (Resolution No. 78-80) I. Set Hearing Date for Vacating Portion of Homewar 11s Road and Page 966 Riverview Road in the Bluffs West Plat for Jun 6 1978 (Resolution No. 78-4B) 1 J. Clerk's License List Page 970 K. Payment of Claims Nos. 9410 - 10D51 Page 971 III. MINUTES A. Minutes of the 21gular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 4, Page 975 i T978�dye 6 iContinucd from April 18th Council Meeting) - - B. Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, April 13, Page 976 1978 City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,May 2, 1978 IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from the Flying Cloud Airport Adhoc Advisory Committee Page 977 to appear before the Council V. PUBLIC HEARINGS COR Investment, request to preliminary plat and rezone from Page 981 Rural to RM 6.5 and Community Commercial for approximately 19 acres in the southweS.x corner of TH 5/Co. Rd. 4 for 4 commercial lots and 14 duplex lots. (Ordinance No. 78-09, rezoning to RM 6.5; Ordinance No. 5'8-10, rezoning to Community Commercial; and Resolution No. 78-37, approving preliminary plat) CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FROM MARCH 7, 1978 R. Round Lake Area Trunk Sewer, Watermain and Street Improvements, Page 595J 1. C. 51-315 (Resolution No. 78-62) CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING & 1111 FROM APRIL 4, 1978 • C. Raven Ridge by Edenvale to preliminary plat and rezone from Page 1118 Rural to RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 for 22 single family and 24 townhouses, Outlot V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, directly east of Edenvale Boulevard and West of Edenvale llth (Resolution No. 78-78, approving preliminary plat, and Ordinance No. 78-25, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 and R1-13.5) ' O. Street Improvement on Lotus View Drive, I. C. 51-321 Page 1130 (Resolution No. 18-19) E. Street Improvement on Dell Road and Valley View Road Page 1131 through Edengate and Maple Leaf Acres, I. C. 51-326 (Resolution No. 78-82 & Resolution No. 78-89) VI. ORDIN,pICES & RESOLUTIONS 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-19, rezoning from Rural to R1-22 Page 1135 for Bryant Lake View Estates, Thelma Griffith Haynes Property, 26 lots on approximately 24 acres and rezoning agreement 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 7B-21, rezonirg from Rural & Highway Page 1143 Commercial to I-2 Park for Minnesota Mini-Storage, 2nd Addition, by Bruce Hubbard and rezoning agreement . 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 76-18, rezoning 16 acres from Page 1150 Rural to R1-13.5 for Amsden Hills III, The Preserve, and rezoning agreement VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1 1. Appointment of a UN Day Chairman for 1978 -- Page 1161 2. Set date for Special Council Meeting to discuss Guide Pll B. Report of City Attorney_ C. Report of City Manager City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,May 2, 1978 D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Bid Award for heavy equipment Page 1162 2. Bryant & Riley Lake Users Fee Page 1163 3. Professional Services CSAH for Bikeway County Road 1 to Page 1169 'trunk Highway 5 E. Report of City Engineer 1. Replat of Lots 6, 7 & 8, Garrison Forest 2nd Addition (Resolution Page 1175 No. 78-86), and setting hearing date for vacating drainage and utility easements (Resolution No. 78-87) 2. Right-of-Way Purchase for T.H. 169 Ramp CNR Golden Strip Page 1182 Property 3. Request for a two-year extension of zoning agreement for Condon/Naegele Realty VIII. NEW BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT. • EDENVALE,INC. r76731fitirlirttit is •Eden Prairie,Minn.55343.612/941-5300 14500 Valley View Road • • April 18, 1978 Mr. Roger Ulstad City Manager • City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Ulstad; At their last meeting, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission unaninnusly approved the preliminary plat and rezoning of Tamarac Additica, a single family R 13.5 subdivision in the Edenvale's northwest area. PIPReP schedule a public hearing before the City Council on this project at their earliest ccnvenienoe. 2Pr2 erson DRP/sr • 41 bquce knufftsoR arrc afc cfa 26 April 1978 h it Mr. Roger Ulstad, City Manager City of Eden Prairie 7801 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Re: Public Hearing Olympic Hills, Outlot 'B' Dear Mr. Ulstad: Please accept this letter as a formal request for the City Council to schedule a public hearing on the rezoning and preliminary plat of the Olympic Hills, Outlot 'B', located next to the S.W. Corner of Olympic Hills 1st Addition on Clubhouse Road. If you have any questions, or if I can be of any assistance, please call me. Very truly yours, BRUCE KNUTSON ARCHITECTS {� N Craig'Beddow BK/ms cc: Don McGlynn Mike Adams 100 north sixth street/minneapolis/minnesota/55403/(612) 338 8877 fir? PRESIDENT: ADAMS OLYMPIC HILLS GOLF CLUB _ VICE-PRESIDENT: � + �( • TYRONEK T!IAYFR • e,+1• if Ql�� 'q7 GENERAL MANAGER: 9520 fran!o Road JOSEPH P DUFFY.JR DIRECTORS: Eden Prairie.Minn.55344 WILLIAM M BAKER 011ice:(612)941-6262 E F DORN.SR God Shop:(612)941-6265 COSTNEY R EGAN THOMAS C HOAK RUDY LUTHER DONALO J McGLYNN JAPRICE W S WALSH COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN: Entertainment&House Commnlee Charles G Ashweu • Harold P Braun Golf Committee Richard J Blooston April 27, 1978 Witham M.Bobmer Membership Committee John H.Hankmson Legal Counsel Michael J Adams City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • To Whom It May Concern: This letter requests that our Olympic Hills 5th addition be placed on your next City Council agenda. Thanking you in advance for your usual cooperation. Yours very truly, • . 424.(11)14001 Olympic Hills Corp. Donald J. McGlynn Director. • a.15-3 rlt/jh 4/26/78 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOIA ORDINANCE NO. 78-16 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to Section 14, Township 116, Range 22 as follows: Part of Lot 6, Block 1, Eden Prairie Center Addition • located in the SE 1/4, Sec. 14, T116, R22, lying easterly of a line bearing N380, 19' 6" east (assuming the tangent portion of the southerly line of said lot 6 as bearing N 890, 49' 31") from a point on the southerly line of said Lot 6 distant 39.01 feet east from the easterly end of the curve on said southerly line having a radius of 1074.00 feet, 'which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone and shall be • included hereafter in the Public zone. Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City relating to such Public zones. Section 3. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this day of , 1978 and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1978. Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk Published in the Eden Prairie News on the `day of , 1978. } CITY OF.EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-83 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF AMSDEN HILLS SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Amsden Hills Second Addition has been sub- mitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordi- nance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all pro- ceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat Approval Request for Amsden Hills Second Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated April 25, 1978. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John O. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Engineering Report on Final Plat TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM, Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 25, 1978 SUBJECT: AMSDEN HILLS SECOND ADDITION PROPOSAL: The Preserve is requesting City Council approval of the final plat of "Amsden Hills Second Addition." This is a 31 lot single • family residential plat (R1-13.5) located northeasterly and adjacent to Amsden Hills addition and south of Anderson Lakes Parkway in the Preserve. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved on December 7, 1977, per Council Resolution #77-I09. Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on • January 17, 1978, per Ordinance #77-31. The final plat now submitted for review conforms with the approved preliminary plat. VARIANCES: Variance from the side-yard setback requirements of Ordinance #135 should be allowed as follows: 5' - garage to side lot line 10' - 1 and 11 story house to side lot line 15' - 2 story house to side lot line 30' - front of building to front lot line 20' - rear of house to rear of lot line 20' - side-yard setback for houses built on corner lots These variances were approved in the Rezoning Agreement dated January 17, 197B. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing and walkways will be installed throughout the development in accordance with City stand- ards. Outlot C consists of a storm water ponding area. Ownership and main- • tenance of this Outlot will be by the Preserve Homeowners Association. ti J I - 2 - PARK DEDICATION: The park dedication fee of $275 per lot, in conformance with the requirements of Ordinance #332, will be required of the follow- ing lots: Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2 Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Block 4 These lots were not included in the Preserve PUD 7-D3. Outlots A and B will be used for open space and grass pathway pur- poses. Ownership and maintenance will be by the Preserve Homeowners Association. BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit approved by the City Attorney in an amount approved by the City Engineer shall be posted to cover the cost of installing the sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, walkways and street signs. A cash deposit of $507 will be required to cover the cost of instal- lation and first year maintenance costs for street lighting. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of "Amsden Hills Second Addition", subject to the requirements of this report and the following: 1. Execution of the "Developers Agreement". 2. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 3. Receipt of fee for City engineering services in the amount of $93D.OD. CJJ:kh • • a tr- May 2, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 78-84 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF GOLF VISTA ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Golf Vista Addition has been submitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in ail respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: • A. Plat Approval Request for Golf Vista Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's • Report on this plat dated April 27, 1978. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, y Subd. 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. • ADOPTED by the City Council on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 6)57 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 27, 1978 SUBJECT: Golf Vista Addition PROPOSAL: The developer, Golf View Investment Company, is requesting City Council approval of the final plat of Golf Vista Addition. This is an • 11 lot addition designed for double bungalows. The plat is located north of Valley View Road, east of Golf View Drive and south of Eden- vale 6th Addition. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved on November 1, 1978, per Council Resolution #77-138. Zoning to RM 6.5 was finally read and approved on January 17, 1978, per Ordinance #77-42. The final plat now submitted for approval conforms with the approved preliminary plat. VARIANCES:' No variances will be allowed for this plat. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing and walkways will be installed throughout the development in accordance with City standards. PARK DEDICATION: This addition is part of the original Edenvale PUD, therefore no additional park dedication will be required. Outlots A, B and C will be deeded to the owners of the adjoining single family lots as required through the rezoning agreement dated January 17, 1978. Outlot D will contain a 6 foot wide bituminous pathway connecting to the existing underpass at Valley View Road. The Outlot and pathway will be owned and maintained by the Edenvale Homeowners Association. BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit approved by the City Attorney shall be posted in an amount approved by the City Engineer, . sufficient to cover the cost of installing the sanitery sewer, water- main, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, walkways and street signs. - 2 - A cash deposit of $202.80 will be required,prior to release of the final plat,to cover.the cost of installation and first year mainten- ance of street lighting. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of "Golf Vista Addition" subject to the requirements of this report and the following: 1. Execution of the "Developers Agreement." 2. Receipt of fee for City engineering services in the amount of $330. 3. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 4. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting. • • CJJ:kh • • • y(90 May 2, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-85 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF THE MEADDWS 2nd ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of The Meadows 2nd Addition has been sub- mitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF • EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat Approval Request for the Meadows 2nd Addidion is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated April 26, 1978. { B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1 waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said Engineer's Report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.35B, Subd. 3. D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Counc..l on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk (RA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 26, 1978 SUBJECT: THE MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION PROPOSAL: The Developer, Dirlam Properties, is ryquesting City Council approval of the final plat of "The Meadows 2nd Addition". This is a 32 lot plat designed for single family residential use (R1-13.5) and double units (RM 6.5), and is located south of the Meadows and north of the Chicago and NOrthwestern Railroad. This project was previous described as "Valewoods" Addition. The Developer has requested that platting be allowed to occur in three phases to allow better staging of the project and enable proper financing. The original proposal was approved in two phases. Outlot D will be replatted in Phase Three. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was apprc•:cd on August 16, 1977, per Council Resolution #77-108. Zoning to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on October 18, 1977, per Ordinance #77-30. The final plat now submitted for approval conforms with the approved preliminary plat. VARIANCES: A variance from Ordinance #93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. This variance should be allowed because the developer has proceeded with the plat in a reason- able and efficient manner. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, and walkways will be installed by the developer in accordance with Eden Prairie specifica- tions. An easement for a temporary turn-around will be necessary over part of Lot 13, Block 1 and Lot 19, Block 2. The street names, Aspen Court and Sundial Court are used in other additions and must be changed prior to release of the final plat. New names must be approved by the Hopkins Postal Department and the City Engineering Department. 96 - 2 - PARK DEDICATION: A cash contribution will be required of this plat per requirements of Ordinance #332. This fee will be $275 per single family unit and $200 per living unit for doubles. Outlots A, B and C will remain as open space. These outlots will be pri- vately owned and maintained. BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit shall be posted in an annual amount approved by the City Engineer to cover the cost of in- stalling the sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and glitter, bituminous surfacing, walkway and street signs. A cash deposit of $405.60 will be required upon release of the final plat to cover the cost of installation and first year maintenance costs for street lighting. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of "The Meadows 2nd Addition: subject to the requirements of this report and the following: 1. Execution of the "Developers Agreemetn". 2. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 3. Receipt of fee for City Engineerign services in the amount of $960. 4. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting. CJJ:kh • • May 2, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.78-80 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A NEW PORTION TO MUNICIPAL STATE-AID ROUTE SYSTEM WITHIN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the roads hereinafter described should be designated as Municipal State Aid Streets under the provisions of Minnesota laws of 1967, Chapter 162: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the roads described as follows, to wit: Municipal State Aid Beginning at the junction of Interstate Highway Street No. 112 494 and Hennepin County Road 60; thence westerly Schooner Boulevard approximately four-tenths mile; thence south- ' westerly approximately two-tenths mile to the intersection of Valley View Road (MSAS 110), and Schooner Boulevard (MSAS 111), a total distance of approximately 0.63 miles and there terminating. Municipal State Aid Beginning at the junction of Minnesota Trunk High- Street No. I13 way 5 and Dell Raod (MSAS 108), thence southerly to Dell Road Hennepin County Road 1, a total distance of ap- proximately 1.91 miles and there terminating. be, and hereby is established, located and designated a Municipal State Aid Street of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Highways of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Highways for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said road or portion thereof, that same be constructed, improved and maintained as Municipal State-Aid Streets of the City of Eden Prairie, to be numbered and known as the above numbered Municipal State-Aid Streets. ADOPTED by the City Council on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk li it MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 27, 1978 SUBJECT: New MSA Route Designation Currently the City has 2.54 eligible miles for designation on the Muni ipal State Aid Street System. The attached drawings show the routes proposed for designation and they have been given preliminary approval by the Department of Transportation. Such designation does not mean that the future MSA roads must be built exactly along the routes shown. The desig- nations are corridors rather than final alignments. The City's annual apportionment of MSA construction funds should increase by abount 14% because of these new designations. It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 78-80. CJJ:kh Attachments Y l7J May 2, 1978 • CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-48 RESOLUTION TO SET HEARING DATE FOR VACATING PORTIONS OF HOMEWARO HILLS ROAO ANO RIVERVIEW ROAO. BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: .1. A petition has been received and a public hearing shall be held on the 6th of June, 1978, at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Hall to consider the vacation of portions of Homeward Hills Road and • Riverview Road described as follows: See Attached description 2. The Clerk shall give proper legal notice of such hearing as required by law. (Two weeks published and posted notice). AOOPTEO by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John 0. Frane, Clerk • BLUFFS WEST STREET TO BE VACATED That part of Homeward Hills Road in the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 116, Range 22 lying northerly of the northerly right of way line of Riverview Road. ALSO that part of Homeward Hills Road in the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 22 lying southerly of a line 30.00 feet westerly of and parallel with the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 26; thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 23 minutes 57 seconds West along the west line of said Southeast Quarter 340.01 feet; thence South 0 degrees 23 minutes 57 seconds East along the west line of • said Southeast Quarter 50.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southeasterly 313.56 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, with a radius of 639.33 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 06 minutes 03 seconds and said line there terminating. STREET TO BE VACATED That part of Riverview Road in the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 116, Range 22 lying southerly of a line 30.00 feet southwesterly of and parallel with the following described line; Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 04 minutes 44 seconds East along the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter 396.69 feet; thence North 64 degrees 28 minutes 33 seconds West 80.60 feet to the point of beginning: thence northwest- erly 237.04 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast with a radius of 286.07 feet and a central angle of 47 degrees 28 minutes 33 seconds to the point of termination. ALSO lying southerly of a line 33.00 feet southerly of the following described line; Beginning at the point of termination of the above described line; thence South 73 degrees West 2B.27 feet; thence westerly 207.71 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the north with a radius of 279.87 feet and a central angle of 42 degrees 31 minutes 27 seconds and said line there terminating. • y('/ MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 27, 1978 SUBJECT: Vacation of Portions of Homeward Hills Road and River View Road The attached Resolution No. 78-48 calls for a public hearing date of • June 6, 1978, for vacating a portion of Homeward Hills Road and River View Road. These vacations were anticipated at the time of approval of the Bluffs West subdivision. Hustad Oevelopment Co. has an agreement with the owners of Tract A, RLS #640, to provide a new driveway access to River View Road in lieu of the present access to Homeward Hills Road. It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 78-48. CJJ:kh Attachment C] JQvep®pment corpor a SOW Aur,ust 31, 1977 • Mr. Carl Jullie City Engineer City of Eden Prairie , 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343 Re: Vacation of Riverview Road • Dear Mr. Ji+llie: !t In accordance with the policies of the City of Eden Prairie, the undersigned landowners are requesting that the City Council vacate that portion of Riverview Road described on the attached exhibit. //n4;,1164c/ Ed Schlampp • Wallace H. Hustad, President The Bluffs Company • 9G9 12750 PIONEER TRAIL,EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343(bi2/941-4383 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST May 2, 1978 CONTRACTOR (Multi-family & Comm.) Carlson-Lavine, Inc. Pump & Meter Service, Inc. CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) Aquarius Swimming Pool Co. Imker Construction Lyn/Dale Homes, Inc. R. J. Nelson Construction Patron Builders Sandpiper Const. Van Eeckhout Building Corp. Richard Wilson Builders, Inc. PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE Guy Schoenecker CIGARETTES & TOBACCO Superamerica These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for the licensed activity. ,a Rebecca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk May 2, 1978 STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: • 04-05-78 9293 VOID DUT CHECK (433.00) 9239 VOID OUT CHECK ( 59.37) 04-13-78 9410 STATE OF MINNESOTA March sales tax report 1,126.45 9411 VOID CHECK: 9412 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1st quarter report of building permit surcharges collected 4,678.02 9413 COCA-COLA COMPANY Pop for liquor store 116.40 9414 PEPSI-COLA Pop for liquor store 31.20 . 9415 BEER WHOLESALERS, INC. 8eer 2,061.55 9416 LAKE REGION BEVERAGE 8eer 592.13 04-18-78 9417 LEDING DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer 1,174.50 9418 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO. 8eer 1,340.45 9419 SEVEN-UP COMPANY Pop for liquor store 56.90 9420 GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE CO. Pop for liquor store 57.75 9421 DAVIDSEN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 8eer 29.90 9422 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer 1,358.19 • 9423 MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC. Liquor 1,184.74 9424 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION March SAC charges 31,284.00 9425 VOID CHECK 9426 VOID CHECK 9427 JOHNSON BROTHERS Wine 1,424.21 9428 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING Wine 252.49 9429 DLD PEORIA CO. Liquor 756.99 9430 ED PHILLIPS & SONS Liquor 1,275.64 9431 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING Wine 298.98 9432 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 172.36 9433 QUALITY WINE CO. Wine 662.83 9434 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION Commercial SAC charges 1,400.00 9435 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employees withheld and employer ASSOCIATION contribution 4-14 payroll 5,738.34 9436 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 4-14 payroll 7,130.28 9437 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 4-14 payroll 27.12 9438 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. Balance due on Civil Defense sirens 2,710.00 9439 U.S. POST OFFICE Stamps for Public Safety 92.50 9440 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION Commercial SAC charges 1,500.00 9441 ALBINSON'S Supplies-Engineering dept. 5.05 04-19-78 9442 ALLIED PLASTIC Supplies for Round Lake Park tennis courts 21.10 04-21-78 9443 HENNEPIN COUNTY Taxes due on park property 358.05 9444 JOHNSON WINE CO. Wine 267.69 9445 ED PHILLIPS & SONS Liquor 1,091.12 9446 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. Liquor 837.46 9447 STATE OF MINNESOTA Auto registration 3.25 May 2, 1978 02-24-78 9448 JIM RICHARDSON Delivery of Council packets 30.00 9449 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN. Registration for four firemen to OF MINNESOTA attend conference 40.00 04-28-78 9450 ADVANCE AMBULANCE Hand bulb syrings-Fire dept. 23.40 9451 AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO. Repair service-Water dept. 22.00 9452 ACRO-MINNESOTA, INC. Office supplies 39.48 9453 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE Book-Water dept. 24.66 9454 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO. Keys-Public Safety dept. 2.85 9455 JEFFERY BENSON Guitar rental refund 10.00 9456 BROWN PHOTO Services & supplies-Public Safety 37.09 9457 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS Supplies-Tree Disease dept. 401.53 9458 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO. Bid ad 205.60 9459 CITY OF EDINA Water samples 27.00 9460 DEAN CONSTANTINE Ballroom dance instructions 62.00 9461 CTS BUSINESS MACHINES Calculator ribbons 18.21 9462 CUTLER-MAGNER CO. Quicklime-Water dept. 1,203.20 • 9463 COPY EQUIPMENT Supplies-Engineering 75.32 9464 DORHOLT PRINTING Printing service 597.62 9465 DOYLE LOCK CO. Supplies-Public Safety dept. 15.00 • 9466 DICKEY-KODET ARCHITECTS Services-New fire station 1,007.05 9467 DALCO Cleaning supplies-Fire dept. 46.00 9468 KELLI ANN DALE Refund on tennis lessons 13,846.8790 9469 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL Gasoline 9470 EDEN PRAIRIE GROCERY Supplies-City Hall 41.27 9471 JOHN FRANE April expenses 110.56 •• 9472 FRONTIER LUMBER ..,aerial-Park Maintenance 137.00 9073 VOID CHECK 9474 GUY'S AUTO SUPPLY Hydraulic jack $797 for garage; 847.83 equipment parts $51 9475 GRENDAHL MECHANICAL, INC. Contract-City Hall addition 4,907.00 9476 GREGG NELSON TRAVEL, INC. Airfare for two Public Safety Officers 252.00 reimbursable 9477 GENERAL COPM4UNICATIONS, INC. Radio repairs-Fire dept. 62.90 9478 HENNEPIN COUNTY Supplies-Street Maint. and garage 102.09 9479 HENNEPIN COUNTY Traffic tickets 274.35 9480 HONEYWELL, INC. Maintenance contract-Water dept. 1,072.25 9481 HONEYWELL, INC. Supplies-Water dept. 58.001 9482 JACK HACKING Expenses 9483 HOPKINS DODGE Equipment repair service 50.35 9484 INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF 45.00 ASSESSING OFFICERS Dues-Robert Martz 9485 I.U.O.E. LOCAL 49 April union dues withheld 187.00 9486 JAMES JENSEN March expenses 9487 ELIZABETH JOHNSON March services and reimbursement of 411 96 expenses 9488 TANYA KUHN Refund on acrobatic & dance class 6.00 9489 VOID CHECK 9490 G. G. KRANZ & SONS Contract-City Hall addition 25,654.00 9491 LANDCO EQUIPMENT, INC. Supplies-Tree Disease dept. 20.29 9492 LACAL CO., INC. Equipment parts 245.70 9493 GEORGE ANN LILLIE Services and reimbursement for supplies-Community Services 28.00 9494 LOFTUS ORNAMENTAL IRON Interior gates at Liquor store 975.00 9495 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION 1,218.50 SYSTEMS March services 9496 LANASS MFG. Snow plow 1,127.00 May 2, 1978 04-28-78 9497 METROPOLITAN ANII1AL PATROL SERVICES, INC. March services 611.00 9498 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Service-Community Services dept. 32.00 9499 METROPOLITAN CLINIC OF COUNSELING, INC. Service-Employees assistance 320.00 9500 ROBERT MARTZ April expenses 110.00 10000 MATT'S AUTO SERVICE Towing service 68.50 10001 MINNESOTA PERSPECTIVES 10002 CONFERENCE Registration for Sandy Werts 226.3927 10003 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. Asphalt 10004 MILLER DAVIS CO. Legal forms-Assessing dept. 11.00 10005 METROPOLITAN FIRE EXTINGUISHER Recharge units and repairs-Fire dept. 180.50 10006 METRO PRINTING Service 4.75 10007 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC Service 10008 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. Gutter broom-Garage 220.00 10009 MINNEGASCO Service 1,044.58 . 10010 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN. Dues-Wally Johnson 40.00 10011 NORTHERN STATES POWER Information service 4.59 10012 NORTHERN STATES POWER Service 2,645.97 10013 NORTHWESTERN BELL Service 2,446.03 10014 PETTY CASH Public Safety fund 6.10 10015 POWER, INC. Battery-Fire dept. 21.77 10016 PATTIE RUCHEL Refund on acrobatic and dance class 2.00 10017 REED'S SALES & SERVICE Weed eater-Park Maint. 242.00 10018 RAINBOW SIGNS, INC. e4 1s for crime prevention 46.25 10019 R. C. PRINTING CO. Liquor licenses ID cards 10.00 10020 ROAD MACHINERY Tree skidder rental-Tree Disease 1,260.00 10021 SUBURBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES Senior Citizen services for 1978 2,200.00 10022 STEPHANIE SCHUFT Refund on dance classes 4.80 10023 JENNY SHORT Refund on acrobatic and dance class 6.00 10024 MAYLEE TELFORD Refund on gymnastics 8.00 10025 TWIN CITIES HARLEY-DAVIOSON Repairs to Public Safety cycle 19.11 10026 ROGER ULSTAD May expenses 137.30 10027 VAN WATERS & ROGERS Chlorine-Water dept. 188.50 10028 WILCOX PAPER CO. Office supplies 292.04 10029 KEITH WALL Reimbursement for meeting expenses 9.00 10030 WHOLESALE LIGHTING, INC. Bulbs for Water dept. 50.64 10031 WATER PRODUCTS CO. Equipment parts-Water dept. 128.11 10032 EOEN PRAIRIE NEWS Subscription-Engineering dept. 88 . 0 8.50 10033 GROUP HEALTH PLAN flay insurance 10034 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE Seminar registration-Carl Jullie 20.00 10035 PEGGY ANDERSON Artwork services-Public Safety 35.00 10036 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES Service-Scenic Heights upgrading 1,014.52 10037 BLOOMINGTON CHRYSLER New Public Safety car 7,042.75 10038 BROWN PHOTO Services-Public Safety 2.50 10039 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN Subscription-Engineering dept.. 26.50 10040 CAPITOL ELECTRONICS, INC.. Radio repair-Fire dept. 66.75 10041 ENGINEERING NEWS-RECORD Subscription-Engineering dept. 42.00 10042' KRIS HEIMBUCK Refund on dance class 12.00 10043 THOMAS HENDRICKSON Reimbursement for supplies-Public Safety dept. 2.45 10044 MASATO IKEGAMI Gym equipment rental-Community Serv. 100.00 10045 CARL JULLIE April expenses 100.00 10046 MINNESOTA FIRE INC. Supplies-Fire dept. 5.00 May 2, 1978 04-28-78 10047 MEDICAL OXYGEN Oxygen-Fire dept. 33.10 10048 W. E. NEAL SLATE CO. Bullentin map board-Public Safety 142.00 10049 ROOT 0 MATIC Thaw frozen line-Water dept. 467.50 10050 KIMBERLY SPANDE Refund on dance lessons 12.00 10051 CONDON-NAEGELE REALTY Payment for deed to outlots D and E; Golden strip addition 85,590.00 TOTAL 234,549.76 • Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,Apri1 4, 1978 • E. Super Valu Stores, Inc. (continued) William Garens, member of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, stated this is a good proposal for the site, but his reservations are with the trail system. 95% of the people have a poor access to get to a major access to a major park. Bye explained it should be pointed out that the problem Eden Prairie has had in acquiring and developing parklands is traced to one similar thing - money. Approximately $40,000 will be contributed by Super Valu to be set aside as their contribution for cash park fee. • Jerry Carnes, 7036 Willow Creek Road, spoke in favor of the Super Valu proposal, complimenting Super Valu and Ellerbe for working with the people in the area and coming up with a proposal that is fair and equitable. Don Sorensen, 7121 Willow Creek Road, explained he is pleased with the efforts Super Valu has made, however, expressed concern about the modification • of the Major Center Area Plan with this particular setting involved. Sorensen also suggested if a trailway easement is going to be provided along Valley View some thought should be given to placing a fence on the inside from the sight standpoint of that trailway system. Mr. Loomis explained Super Valu has same concerns about the misuse of the property,but hoped it would not be necessary to construct a fence. However, Super Valu will take whatever steps necessary to protect the property. Penzel stated the recommendation for a scenic easement has come up a number of times. Mr. Loomis responded it is Super Valu's understanding that through the zoning process they are just rezoning this particular site, and the City has a great deal of control through zoning and permits as to the remaining area. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 78-52, approving the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Super Valu. Motion carried unanimously. Meyers requested that Resolution No. 78-51 be amended in the first line of the second "WHEREAS" clause by adding "conceptual". MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 78-51 as amended, granting request for a PUD Amendment to the Major Center PUD for a 140 acre site for Super Valu. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-14, rezoning of 35 acres from Rural to Office for Super Valu's corporate headquarters. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to direct the City Attorney to draft a developers agreement for the PUD Amendment incorporating land uses as shown for office space and open space only, removing the remaining land use designations of housing and commercial from the Major Center Area original PUD. Further incorporating recommendations of the Hennepin County Department of Transportation for accesses as per communication dated April 3, 1978, restrictions of any docks or piers on the entire PUD parcel, open space to remain unaltered and in natural state, no clearing along lakes other than • 'I) SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 1978 5:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, 8illy 8ye, Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad and Planning Director Chris Enger The meeting was called to order at 5:00 PM by Mayor Penzel. Roll Call was taken: Meyers, Pauly and Penzel present; Bye and Osterholt absent. Chapter 5 of the Guide Plan was reviewed up to the section on Transportation. Suggested changes were discussed and the Council requested Staff to provide additional recommendations for Council consideration at their next Special Guide Plan meeting. Meeting stood adjourned at 8:00 PM. 'r. • APR 121973 Fir. atoll'•-:.n^, H. Penzel April 6, 3978 1:aycr, City of P'den _Prairie Eden Prairie City Council 8950 Etch Prairie Road • Eden Prairie, i•;irn 55344 • Re: Flyir. Cloud Airport Adhoc Committee Dear mayor Penrel and City Council: We, as members of the Adhoc Committee arc reutordl1 ttu_�ou forwarded of March 1"„ l9'8, directed to N.A.C., J' to us with their accorpanyin letter The terninolcr•,v that you chose to use to describe the sincere efforts • • and intense deliberations of. our coctittee was offensive. We believe that we acted independently and creatively and resent the accue?tion that we were obzioasly structured by and totally controlled by the M.A.C'.•. We request placement en the council agenda and will make ourselves available immediately to discuss this matter. At that time, tie will be recommsrdir.^ the establishment of an on;oir„ Adhoc Committee to • • • continue communications and assessing airport operations. + Any coriespor,dence prior to our appearat..... at the council sectiii6 should i,e directed to our acting secretary, Sally Brown, 10080 Bennett Place, Eden Prairie, Minn. 55344. Sincerely, The citizens of the Airport Adhoc Cotoitteo Kent Barker Lois West3nnd• • Tin Pierce Diane Luke Gloria ...stiur.d l.••'•otr $1 Don Pei.c1 cn ' ,lie. 0stcn:-oo Rod Sur•dct.roa • Earns Scaee Nancy Laidla• Sally Brown Tom Jere•tt • c.c.: hi••eort. Adhoc Committee mambos M.A.C. TO April 18, 1978 Dear Airport Adhoc Advisory Committee Member: I am in receipt of your letter dated April 6, 1978, regarding my letter to M.A.C. dated 3/13/78. I do want to thank you for expressing your feelings and concerns and, more importantly, apologize for the terminology which you have found offensive. In no way was it my intention or desire to demean the activities, deliberations, and ideas of the citizen members of the Adhoc Committee. The letter was written at the express direction of the City Council with the intent of conveying the Council's concerns and dissatisfaction with the process used by M.A.C., and the resultant majority report. While it is true that individual citizen members acted, thought, and voted independently and courageously, it is also true that the 16 - 8 final vote clearly shows that a meeting of the minds did not occur, and that the basic makeup of the committee had a lot to do with the result obtained. It is my desire to continue open communications between M.A.C. and our community. This goal would best be achieved, in my opinion, by a committee appointed by the City Council and acting in an advisory capacity to M.A.C. and the City. In order to assure the ability to function, size should be limited and staff support be provided in a manner comparable to present City commissions. I would welcome your thoughts on this matter, and hope to meet with you at the earliest opportunity. Sincerely, Wolfgang H. Penzel Mayor of Eden Prairie WHP:jp (j7 April :8, 1978 Page Two P.S. At the City Council meeting held this evening, April 18, action was taken by the Council to propose to M.A.C. the establishment of a City Advisory Consrittee. The committee would be responsible for airport matters and to the City Council and M.A.C. The connittee as proposed would consist of seven members to be appointed by the City Council: 3 airport businessmen, 3 citizens, and a chairman. Staff would be supplied comparable to other City commissions. If you wish to meet with the Council at the next City Council meeting on May 2, 1978, please let me know. • • • • • • 9 )9 RIC11.ARI) N1. Per RICK 6,Iri1c;.MotiOAnmlc f, Nelt R.mtc,1ltllt e,oLI SC it i �� f\ 4 1��j IJ April 21, 1978 Mayor and City Council Members Eden Prairie City Offices 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mayor and Council Members: This is to provide a few thoughts on the proposed Flying • Cloud Ad Hoc Committee for your consideration. The recent proceedings with the Metropolitan Airports siC Commi- ssion may not have been completely satisfactory from y's standpoint, but there did seem to be a genuine willingness on the part of some of the MAC representatives to work with the community and to address areas of concern. Specifically, I believe Gertrude Suel and Claude Schmidt did everything in their power to understand Eden Prairie and to try to find reasonable solutions. The proposed Ad Hoc Committee would provide for continuing discussion on outstanding issues and would allow for close moni- toring of all activities and progress at the field. This appears to be in the best interests of all the involved parties. It should also be mentioned that there are a number of small businessmen trying to make their livelyhood at the field. Some of these people live in our community, and are involved in our community's organizations. At least one or two are coaches in our youth programs. To a great extent they are caught up in events beyond their control. The Ad Hoc committee would help put many issues in perspective and would also provide an understanding as to the areas where the Flying Cloud field is an asset to the community and metropolitan area. Your consideration is appreciated here. Very truly yours, R. M. Feerick RMF:cn 9` o Unapproved Planning Commission -3- April 24, 1978 C. COR Investment Revised, request fnr PUD approval for office & multiple, rezoning from Planned Study to Office and RM 6.5 and preliminary plat approval for 1 apartment site, 48 duplexes, and 1 office site. A public hearing. The Planner informed the Commission the Council referred the project back to the Planning Commission and will be back to the Council on May 2nd. He reviewed the plan for 1 apartment site, 1 office site, and 48 duplexes, and stated the commercial sites have been eliminated. He added that the project would have to submit buffering and screening plans to be approved by the staff. He added the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission has reviewed the revised plans and recommends a eight foot wide trail along Co.Rd. 4. Sundstrom inquired if the proponent concurs with the staff report. Mr. Bruce Knutson, Bruce Knutson Architects,repl led affirmative. Sundstrom then asked why rezoning is not requested on the apartment site. Mr. Knutson replied they have no immediate user at this time. Sundstrom inquired why the proponent had not submitted grading plans. Mr. Knutson replied they wanted confirmation on uses proposed prior to investing in the cost of such plans. McCulloch asked how high the office building would be. Knutson replied two stories. Sundstrom asked how soon construction would begin. Knutson replied as soon as approval is received from the City. He added they have already received access approval from the County Highway Department. Levitt inquired how many units may be in the apartment building. Knutson • estimated 48 units with underground parking. Sundstrom asked if anyone in the audience had questions or comments. None were raised. Motion 1: McCulloch moved, Retterath seconded , to close the public hearing on COR Investment Revised Plat. Motion carried unanimously. • Motion 2: McCulloch moved, Levitt seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the COR PUD for office and multiple uses according to the plan dated April 4, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 3: McCulloch moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Planned Study to RM 6.5 for 48 duplexes, and rezoning from Planned Study to Office for 1 office lot according to the plat submitted and dated April 4, 1978, and contingent upon the staff reports of Jan. 18 and April 19, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. a?/ `p\t3N[SO �O r9 y0 CI Minnesota Department of Transportation 9 Q % ' District 5 • r C�� OF T \�� 2055 No.Lilac Drive April 24, 1978 Golden Valley.Minnesota 55422 (612)545.3761 Mr. Chris Enger Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 S.P. 2701 T.H. 5 Plat Review of COR Investment Revised located in the Southwest Quadrant of T.H. 5 and C.S.A.H. 4 in Section 8 and 17, Township 116, Range 22 in City of Eden Prairie • Hennepin County Dear Mr. Enger: We are in receipt of the above referenced plc' for our review in accordan J with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys. We find the plat accept- able for further development with consideration of the following comments: -- This development was reviewed by the Department in February of this year and comments were forwarded to you. Most of those comments are still • applicable to this revised plat. • --We would like to take this opportunity to commend the City and the Devel- oper for the solution of a potential noise problem. The proposed eight feet berm should provide a significant reduction in anticipated noise levels. With the addition of the berm, noise levels should be below State and Federal. standards. -- We suggest that the developer also take into consideration comments • furnished by the Hennepin County Department of Transportation in regard to C.S.A.H. 4. • -- Any construction (such as part of the earth berm) on the trunk highway right of way must be approved by a permit from our district office. If you have any questions in regard to the above comments, please contact our District, Layout, Research and Development Engineer, Mr. Joel S. Katz, at 545-3761 extension 150. Thank you for your cooperation in these matters. Since ly, ) //..--771(>n � /1 �,in, cc: John Boland - Met. Council i �LL - Henne in Countya Gary Backer P W. M. Crawford,'P.E• /t An goal Opportunity Employer District Director dD►® (4- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION •+x'� : 320 Washington Av. South ;_ .-T Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 ``' ,,, HENNEPIN 935,3381 April 24, 1978 Mr. Chris Enger, Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: RE: Proposed Plat - "Cor Investment - Revised" CSAH 4 - Southwest quadrant CSAH 4 TH 5 Section 8 & 17, Township 116, Range 22 . Hennepin County Plat No. 657 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We have reviewed the above referenced plat and find it acceptable with consideration of the following conditions: 1. The developer should dedicate an additional 10 feet of right of way for a total of 50 feet from and along the centerline of CSAH 4. 2. The developer must apply for and receive an approved entrance permit before beginning construction of the proposed access to CSAH 4. Entrance permit approval will be conditioned on the developer widening the existing acceleration taper, along the west side of CSAH 4 to a full width (13 feet) turn lane from TH 5 to the proposed access street. An acceleration lane for southbound traffic from the proposed street will also be required. The developer must also submit detailed drainage plans with the permit application. Entrance permit forms are available from our Traffic Division. Please contact Don Murphy, 935-3381, for information. I HENNEPIN COUNTY `1 93 on equal opporlunIty employer Cor Investment - Revised Page 2 3. A copy of the proposed plat must also be submitted to the Minnesota Department of Transportation, District 5 headquarters in Golden Valley, for review. 4. All proposed construction within County right of way requires County approval before beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage construction, utility construc- tion, trail development, and landscaping. A utility permit is required for this work. Utility permit forms are available from our Maintenance Division. 5. The developer must restore any area within County right of way that is disturbed during construction. Please direct any response or questions to Douglas Mattson at this office. Sincerely, James M. Wold, P.E. Chief. Planning and Programming by fr James V. Vohs Supervising Engineering Technician JMW/DBM:bg cc: Bruce Knutson Architects Evan Green, Mn/DOT 4/20/78 Engineering Staff Recommendations COR Development Supplement to Manning Staff Report 1. Storm sewer and gradine plans must be approved by the Engineering Department and Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District. This approval is required prior to Preliminary Plat approval. 2. Access to County Road 4 must be approved by the Hennepin County Highway Department. 3. The Developer shall submit a finalized development plan, prior to final plat approval or building permit issuance, which shall show proposed grading, storm water drainage areas and direction of flow, preliminary utility plans, pending and floodplain high water levels for 100 year storm and minimum floor elevations for all lots. 4. Assessment information: The fallowing assessment has been levied: #7028 Trunk sewer and water $27,373 CJJ:kh • • 975 L STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Planning Director DATE: April 18, 1978 APPLICANT: COR Investment • LOCATION: Southwest corner of TH 5/Co.Rd. 4 REQUEST: 1. PUD approval for approximately 4.21 acres of multiple family( density 10-12 units/acre; residential for 9.14 acres for 24 duplexes medium density (5.25u/a) ; and office designation for 1.76 acres for a building size of approximately 15,400 square feet. 2. Rezoning from Planned Study to Office District for 1.76 acres, and rezoning from Planned Study to Rt 6.5 for 24 duplexes on 9.14 acres. 3. Preliminary plat approval for 43 duplex lots , one 4.21 acre site Tor future apartment and one 1.76 acre site for office. REFER TO: 4/5 Study 1968 Guide Plan 1978 Updated Guide Plan, proposed Jan. 18, 1978 staff report BACKGROUND: Included is a copy of the staff report dated Jan. 18, 1978, which was written on the original COR submission. The Planning Commission, at that time voted unanimously to recommended denial of the rezoning of the • original request to the City Council . The Planning Commission objected to the number of commercial lots proposed as part of the original request. The proponent subsequently requested the City Council to continue the public hearing before the Council to allow the proponents to modify the request more in-line with the Planning Commission's concerns. The City Council continued the CUR public hearing to May 2, 1978, and referred the item back to the Planning Commission. -------- ? i'f: ,;4‘4';'..- vrYir , _,-•-... ____, - --, ,r,)_i • • --1g 5Fr iitk•••'... i'i,. "1 • ''I I/ ' '' • I .4.4 itv:::„.,!. i.,..;•-•,. ,• /: i i• ,..,..- ----...____ , ,. ,4 I 7,•'.. i !' •,, ' , • il i ,r, '.'.' ! ___ . : • 1- It-':•;• •,-.t 4.”7 i ; , ! :' , , 7 • :/: ... , -- . \ , \ ,.- --- '',: 1 --!'t.-I 1. it, .;:j1 ;:?• Y„ !J= .' i \\., •\. ' tt ' i" Y - • ' : • ; 4 - -- t ! .--. . . ---,,-- -,...-.-;---7.-1-.--,-!--,-,—;..—..---7---1.----"-t- \--:-f:j . i 1• . .... 1 , ; .,,,,, ,v: ..! ,,,: .,:,,.,i !,,, ; ..... .' 4; 1 ' 1 4 --l'• ! I I : - •_-.1,. ._. . -... ‘ --.:----7.-1'.r--' • 1.7.:77,'•/;',.'.:*:-.-•,' ' , _,-- ,.. .--,t„ ...• ! -,.---, • 1: ` ,::-•--=1 . .N. .;,!.,!•., Id'::_:,___,... .,; . II '7 I -,N,„/ • . ...',.... 1 . ....., ..t . - v.. ,, -, _ „/t. \ -._-....-.....,-...T_-_.•-.-.:..-. .. '. -*......-S1,K 'LI ../,?..---------------1----,--y-r-r--,`,,,,...._:%..‘• -"'/' .71: ' '!.• 1. 4,,, ,• 4,,, ,/ ,, , ,, i r__ . :,.... • ..• .., -, -,...,/,/,., _. !.1 ;," A' ..---";• \ • % • 7, • ,. , t.1__.. i___..1-. , :;i_.-, it' 4 1' , ! i•-ii,;. : I 1- ---.....,'..--'""• '," , ..4',i .'");".-4--.-.--:•• ' .1' ' ''', 71 t ?. * . i • , ,,,,i ,..._,_ --;• ;•: • . ; _'•„,...----- i •'' . . . , . •• -,7-^,-t i t. i,j 1 ;1----'-'—'-..'''-'- ---7',.... -01A1121M111......_. ',....---",, ''' -.) '....' •'-,. - ' .., i -'" •...,...___±_.-.7-.,-:L„ :71 ' V . -. ----,- . _. .•- - '"- ''' '' . ,'i" - .,..-' .'''''.:' - • •-i '-.....__ .•\--,-•-•'- •-• .: ' • 1 ;i, - ' -:•/‘ ',, —'I- 1 ,,, ' •'___ =--iLlit7i'VVtile-t__ :_i ; - , •,- -005+ V‹; t I • ,,--, ‘‘;!•••4t\ ,VI,VJeA lae,! , • .... L----- 174-•:-IVIGri,;(; _:•-•'- :• r c,\--V., r:',! \ t '0,_.• 1). ,, 1 ft .•/ .. ....- . ' . L.---. 1 I.i'; s''. -;' 1 i J. • ,"' \\\ ..... ',-'„-''i;.itl7lt ,-'-'.S."..,....J._•---_•-•_-:1_: ;i!%l 1 \ .•,‘*;\•.,\,.,\.\ ,..: r'i r - I -' a L , t! L L L— - . Abl m 'i! / /1 ,4,li)i • .•1. ! I\ C& I i , t • . f-.-.--'-. ...-."..)i.-....11.7- .- ';'' H ' '' " IT-I 1'47,—.,---'• -.'----.:/-' ---;-1-7,' j' ,_ ,/-. '''P-7- - •:i i ..,,c_. 7, 31,.. l P- .„; ' '4•-,) --i i c.,,',/..7,% ._ : !.. py.'i 0 • i,•1 ii ! : • : , • • •• Ii-- i Z "ft- 1 7---7-k , , , .. 1 . s, .• ,0i,.:, ,41.______._ rs _ — -, . ., ...., t I. ,•!--q ?,'• 4 ,•- , ,:,A , i.--/.:,/;'-- I/ i! ;,, ,4: .., .1.r 1,-1 ;. •c :;,••'',-.,-,-,,-7-.7"... ; N), 1 ,"/ //,',' ,',/,/ // ‘, .1 ; • 0 , i , i'• (.., " IS':.-...-2.:2-.'7.- -,ns / \•'2' ', ----,t/t - : ' ' -t.;-.---'—'-` \s.- / • i-e..-• •'!" --____ 1 ;•:•1*.-_-_-___.-:--1,=-7.,..-,,F7.7,7-.....,,..;•...,..----cr-----,—,.- ,• i ,, , • . i. t •••:' ci; 1•• ..,,--------,.. ..., __ .-_ / c ,, r•-,-., :.------lt:i.,..,, ;,.. 1 • L../ iiNi t' I ; • 1 •— -f, 1 ! i\1::\ , I., y ,i. 1. .. : i ....‘i ,, ;• 1 4 \L‘' 'I il!{',1; ; s , •: -it:-7 .',.. ..:_l___. , tj•L-_:----,.11 1_ \ i C 1 k i.-41.k. ar 4.••;.1..1 .y_tb.ie !j I,.. i t. (77;7,,- ,' ,,,N;:--,. ..1,,r, . ., : •i ..: Staff Report-Revised COR invt. -2- April 18 ,1978 PRESENT REQUEST The new submission is similar to the original submission in basic road configuration. The land uses have been changed by eliminating the four commercial lots. Access is no longer needed from TH 5 and there is a good separation between the duplex land use and the anticipated small office site. The proponent is applying for a PhD approval which requests designation for duplexes on the 9.14 acres of land adjacent to Mitchell Lake, office designation south of Super America and adjacent to Co.Rd. 4, and multiple family designation(hetween 10-12 units/acre) for the 4.21 acres west of Super America and south of TH 5. The Planning Staff believes this basic mix of land uses is a good proposal and includes buffering of the duplex units from TH 5 and Super America; and it allows the transition use of office between the residential uses and Super America and Co.Rd. 4. The amount of traffic expected to be generated out of this particular proposal would be between 750-800 cars/day as compared to over 1200 cars/ day expected in the original proposal. The Hennepin County Highway Department has evaluated this proposal and finds the access to Co.Rd. 4 acceptable, but does recommend turning lanes be constructed. These turning lanes should be constructed according to County standards when the entrance permit is applied for. In addition, the County has requested a total of 50 feet of ROW dedication from the centerline of Co.Rd. 4. RELATIONSHIP OF LAND USES The duplex lots occurring in the northwest corner of the site, directly adjacent to TH 5, shall be a minimum of 50 feet from the ROW. As part of the overall grading, a 8 foot earth berm shall be placed along the northern lot lines of the duplex lots in accordance with plans to be submitted and approved by the Planning Department prior to final plat approval. Also as part of the overall grading, berining should be incorporated along the back lot lines of the duplex lots adjacent to the future designated multiple family area. As part of the approval for office site, prior to building permit issuance, a detailed landscape plan shall he submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval which shows buffering of the office building from the residential uses , and a screening of the parking area from differing adjacent land uses and the public road. • • Staff Report-Revised COR Invt. -3- April 18, 1978 • SETBACKS AND LOT SIZES Of the 48 duplex lots, all are above the 6,500 square feet/unit minimum requirement of Ord. 135. The setbacks for the RM 6.5 category are as follows: minimum lot width of 90 feet minimum lot depth of 100 feet front yard setback minimum 30 feet • side yard setback 10 feet one side; 25 feet both sides rear yard setback of 20 feet • • minimum lot size . 13,000 square feet/duplex The Revised COR plan meets Ordinance requirements with the exception of the units lying on lots 13-20, adjacent to Mitchell Lake. These lots occur on the outside radius of the curve of the road and range between 66 feet of frontage (for total duplex lot) to the required 90 feet of frontage. The staff recommends that at the 30 foot setback, that the lots be no less than 90 feet in width / duplex unit. • ORAINAGE The current grading plan for the cul-de-sac road serving the duplex lots shows no drop on the surface street grade between the cul-de-sac occurring on the northwest end of the parcel and the intersection of the road leading to the multiple family area. This grading plan must be revised and submitted to the Engineering Oepartment prior to Council action on the pre- liminary plat. Storm sewer is not depicted on the current plan and must be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department prior to preliminary plat approval. This storm sewer plan would probably would take drainage from the roads into a catch basin system and down through a storm sewer pipe to Mitchell Lake. This system must be submitted and approved by the Riley/Purgatory Watershed District Board of Managers. PARKS. RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES CODu•1ISSION RECO•iiiENDATIONS • On the original request the PRNR Commission recommended the proponent construct, on their property adjacent to Co.Rd. 4, a section of the Co.Rd.4 bikeway from the southern property line to the northern property line of 4 inch deep strength asphalt, 8 feet in width, according to City Engineering q Department standards. This should be constructed at the time of street and 41 t utility installation. The PRN1t Commission also recouenended cash park fee be paid according to Ord. 332. (5200/duplex unit„200/multiple unit, PeS120O/oFfice) Staff Report-COR Revised -4- April 18, 1978 RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff would recommend the Planning Commission: 1. Approve the PUD depicting mixed residential land uses and office for the COR site . Density to he between 10-12 units/acre occurring on 4.21 acres adjacent to TN 5, office • designation for 1.76 acres occurring directly south of Super America ; and duplex , multiple family designation • for approximately 48 residential lots occurring on 9.14 • acres for a density of 5.25 units/acre. The PUD to be contingent upon the plan dated April 4, 1978. • 2. Recommend to the City Council rezoning of the area shown for duplex lots from Planned Study to 101 6.5 for 48 lots on 9.14 acres, and the 1.76 acre area from Planned Study to Office, all contingent to the plan submitted April 4, 1978 and the conditions listed in the staff report of April 18, 1978. 3. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat dated April 4, 1978 contingent upon the following items: • a. •c tailed grading and utility plans must. be submitted ana approved by the City Ergitletring Department prior to preliminary plat approval by the City Council. These • plans along with sedimentation control plans must be submitted to and approved by the Riley/Purgatory Watershed District prior to issuance of a grading permit. b. city lot size and setback requirements be adhered to. • c. that a bikeway 8 feet in width of 4 inch deep strength asphalt be constructed adjacent to Co.Rd.4 on the property at time of utility and street construction according to City Engineering standards with right of public easement. d. that a detailed landscaping plan showing buffering between uses and highways be submitted to the City Planning Staff for approval prior to final plat approval. The buffering between the duplex area and TN 5, and between the duplexes and apartment site shall he constructed as part of the overall grading of the first phase of development. e. that a new legal description depicting the exact boundaries of the R1.1 6.5 area. office, and future multiple family be submitted to the planning staff prior to the second reading of the ordinance. f. that the cash in lieu of land park fee he paid according to Ord. 332 prior to building permit issuance. g. that any substantial deviation from the plan shown for office a. be approved by the Planning Commission prior to building permit issuance. CE:JJ 990 brILCO • • MEMO TO: Eden Prairie Planning Commission FROM: Cor Investment Company • • RE: Zoning District Change and Platting of Property Located • in the Southwest Quadrant of the Intersection of Highway 5 and County Road 1 DATE: 31 March 1978 • • •In 1974-75, Cor Investment Company presented to the City a plan to develop their property into regional commercial space. With the • development across the highway of a similar facility, their plan was withdrawn and alternate alternatives studied. It was recommended that this property be developed as strip highway commercial for a distance of 200' along Highway 5 and residential (PM 2.5) to • extend to Mitchell Lake and further south. Recently the area was allowed to lapse into plan study. As a result of numerous meetings with the City Planner, Engineering Department and Hennepin County Public Works Department, the present plan was arrived at: • Dlulti-Family (RM 2.5) consisting of + '1 acres adjacent to Highway 15; RM 6.5 residential (duplex) south to Lake Mitchell consisting of 9.14 acres and OFC/Office adjacent to County Road 14 consisting • of 1.76 acres. No variances arc being requested. • • . Specific Requirements • • 1. The property was purchased from George and Mable Moran, November 6, 1972, on a Contract for Deed by Cor Investment Company. 2. Cor Investment was established in 1972, by Carl Nelson, Oliver • Rekow, Sid Hardman and A. L. Rubinger. Their previous experience has been in real estate investment and development. • They anticipate long term involvement in this and other similar • developments. 3. Financing of the project will be through personal investment for • the development costs and mortgage bankers for the long term • capitalization. 4. The present approach to land sale is to develop a land use and site plan that maximizes the location and topography of this choice piece of land. Once a final plan is arrived at, tLe residential . lots will be sold in blocks to one or several independent con- tractors to build homes on. ' • 100 north sixth street/minneapdi:;/rninncsota/55403/(612) 338 8877 1Bni C knlf toon a T�;'G�U�i�` © page '2' Several prospects have expressed an interest in building a • small office building adjacent to County Road 4, south of • the Supera,nerica station. This structure would act as a • buffer between County Road 4 and the residential development. Preliminary plans have been made for a medium density apart- ment adjacent to Highway 5. The building would be of residential scale and provide an excellent buffer and transition • from the highway. Financing has not been arranged and zoning is not requested at this time. The only common areas or facilities will be the roads and their boulevards. Maintenance of these areas will be by the • • • City of Eden Prairie. • • 5. The boundaries to the north and east are State Highway 5 and ' County Road 4, respectively. Immediately to the south is open farm land and then residential. To the west is open land, part of Mitchell Lake and scattered residential. • • 6. North across highway is shopping center. East across Highway 4 is existing acres of industrial uses: Fuller Lab, Stewart Sandwich, Ro 1 I tank Chamtpi^ Kibby Engineering and 10 • acres of single family residential. West and south are basically open land.and Mitchell Lake. • • • 7. The major regional relationship is the projects location. It is the center of two major collectors tying several major residential sectors like Edenwale, Redrock, Western Eden • - Prairie, and Round/Duck Lake together. 8. Existing land use is recommended commercial and residential. The land is unoccupied now except as farm land. 9. Existing transportation systems consist of State Highway 5 to the north and County Road 4 to the east. No interior pedestrian • system exists at the present. • • 10. Existing zoning is open. • • 11. City Guide Plan framework recommends this utilization of the land. • 12. Critical public decisions concerning this property will be the • future status of Highway 5 and the type of access this property will have; the future status of Highway 4 and the ultimate • • development along these roads. Sufficient utilities exist in the area to support this development. The steep wooded slopes to the east of Mitchell would hinder conronercial and larger scale • developments, but enhance the potential for custan single family residences. 92(� 100 north sixth shoot/minncapolis/minnesota/55403/(612) 338 8877 Ib ©© knuason arrc ®ohs • page '3' 13. Careful attention has been given to access off of Highway 5, interior circulation and land use. • • • • • (3g3 100 north sixth street/minneapolis/minnesota/55403/(612)338 8877 .j j':• '; ( 0 ,,. / : ,' tz '• : '' t:- , ._'., zz i!, , . i. i' ', ' ...—._ 4, r 1 4 • r,-:.; . ;,!...-•.:4•: -, i.., • ) .= .1. ,t ' ‘ )i I 'if ; '" ' —•' , 4 ._ .,_.1. ,,.. „._ ....___,_ , 1 ' •e:-.. /'. .1, ,.v..,-„,‘ , - t.,, \; I 1 ,:. ..., •• • • ,.. , ,, t, , ,. ,. , / , I./„...... .. - , ,.77—. — ,... .:st ...,.,.‘,-,,,„ , _ -4;• • _..-=,.. • .!, .\- ,;..-:..\.,,'.._!..J.14?i; 1•!,=---7---1 N,, '\-•c- . , ' ;.? i 4,-77'22 j...... '\ \--;!;:i.- '-', :1.7-7-' ; • ..2•-,' '.•-..i.:-. ..;'2'' ! I 1 i'1.4=22''. '.›.- - z!..!••-/N .., ..; . T-'-:"._,._i_.:3.-----r."-:.7..tra.) 14; ` 1 ! ! .,-, 'ivy ,...,...--:: , 1---.._,..• i j lip -7,.-_-- .•-- - :-.......-; ,"? ../: ..."--;:::::-----"7-1---I---I.7--1-',...-1' I • . , i • 1..1 .• ',.----7.7 r-. , . ,.,_:., ,./, ;7, f :.----1. .. .--,r---1, • ".!' t; ' III' - t --. 4' ..'-' -.:1! -' //,,//- ./- --:1 !ill /1/!.,---2;c1\ ' ., • , , 1 Izz•--., . I •=--• • 1........ a •,..., .,.I'/. ,' ;:... •'• .-4--r--"..,--:2_,t •;1...--+ '\, \ • !,..‘ ; ...-......:'-....,..., '-' i t ' 1 ,',1-t `--• t'1\: ; l'o'l ,‘ ..,. 14-1 ..: _ ! .. t \ . I ••• ,_.J,— t':: , \ t \I I 1 's— F— ' - --)' -----— ,, .1 ;--'-----------,---7.-,--,--..., , --_-..,,""7—.7.. . ,T _ •/, 2--: i 1 2 ,12_•_i.4 i . .; A 2‘I...," 2"".a.,z,- .,. . -,....„.......-- -,„, ,,,.. r. .' --14i-2, 17 1 1:7 '7•"'--1-;/-`, i ' :"2 I- 2:'''' ' :2- '" : 1 ' _ _..,_ ii • . / ---:e , I t 2 -..... -- -L11-'''n I l' ; -7 ± 2:..I ' - 'Il '.-i' 11 I i 1.1 ,r—, • , ,1 • •, ,•...,. i , v• , ,- ..)-1., :-. • i . .-0 i t;---_. ,--.. ;1 r, . 1 - . # ..4-4,•••• • •:isl',• i' 1,f .,., I, I 11,t, —. • 1 - L.___"_.15-i—41;'i-1----,==1,-=•,- r\ 1'4.; i i, '... ..1.; .,1. - L____, Hs 1\:.—„• t --1:;• . , z, ; , i . 4. i !...._-_•___ _.i_7 1,;;,, !---2 2--21„' ,\ i \ \M ; I I' . , Is . 7-77 ,I I:`i:i 1... t , 1 ; `.• , k --„ ---4-4).-•':-:!t' !1- '-a2-2-1 \\'..0 '''' i •, , I. !I .1- .• • '1 t',' ''. '• ! r . !, -'.. 1 : 1 1!. t-7 t , ''13 ) 7\ •, ,i I 11.1 1 -•-f--"‘ ----- .---4•1:1'7 V i t i C.:1,1 - \-/ / ! / it 1 !!, . .----,:i--....47,--.1 .i—:_!__ —__ ,-,..r...— '• .„., I,. ;, i••• k j t I i,/ / if •:'\ 1 ' 1 1 ; , ''' •--:._.-__.,....-----;,,,,„! „.,. _._2.....,,v1 -----5 'ii, •1 i/ I iii .. ...—.7A ,,i1t1 1,7'1-* • ,I.l'----',, , \ . V / 1 ii k I .-,..2 ; •1! 1.--_ I' .2 ''•1.--....-.! I;P- --1-------4----74C-."----471"--'tf-7----`1 f:i •ii! i ' _____...r.ii.i._ Iii:`,. ..:-.-,-,...--;--_-f 1,..i- j, \. • ; ii i • F ' i : ‘. ... , , ,/ , • -...._•.____--,...-.-.- ,•,,••••_„• •._,,p; 1 \ , - ,T.,:„.•• -_.,, $ 1 le •,-ii, 1 --- .,-, • 1 / / ----,:_t ..i: :;,, ,... : \\ / ,, 1 Vi-'7—) t,\i' ','!,.-1:1„..., : \i / • .." t;‘,2...1 .,: n y'i \I-24, / ..------I !'.: :-,1 li.--'-3j ',A ,,(; ..,;__----7H• 7/ ( ; I ), ,1 ,•:,..., . , rr---"° ' l' (4 •,' •///:(// / \ 1, 1 !!k , ::'":-.1_. ___._,. : \y• .', • ',, , ..,•• .5 t , • . 1.. . f . . ,..,•-,:-.;-_-,_:.--, ; ,_, • - :1 i • -_--•-_-- ,, ,,,, r•-rt---.: ,I _ 1 •f----- --'`=-1,_=,.----7.-._--__C..1---.. ,_,„,,_;,,, il,kgAi , . !,', ..,...,...r...,• 1• a .-- --it•itt.t .. '';7—r—h.— !---. i ;;;-.2,,,!'"' 2tik,01 2 • IJ' 1 2.1 1,` ' t- - - -:-'- 'I!-- :. 1 ' ' / ,,\o'g 7 i•t tt,Q : i - I 1 ,--I- t • ' i ' — i . ,if. ' - 7 y i I ,;,1(!ii..!:.1..rsr' ;1,';4..1;.,.:'!;\-7;°;-.:72-'T,T15:1;:'-'•;7* ,_ ..... 4 1 I I-----(-2-L--1.- ---- -. . MINUTES PLANNING CDM-IIISSION MEETING approved Monday, January 23, 1978 .7:30 PM City Hall COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sundstrom, Retterath,McCulloch,lynch, Bearman,Redpath COMMISSION ABSENT: Schee Staff Present: Chris Enger, Jean Johnson • I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA • Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to add under flew Business, Waste Control Site, and approve agenda as submitted and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 9, 1978 MEETING P. 4, D.,2nd line should read . . split a 4 acre tract into two 2 acre tracts . Retterath moved, Redpath seconded, to approve the minutes as submitted and corrected. Motion carried unanimously. • III. MEMBERS REPORTS A. Chairman Sundstrom 1. Sundstrom informed the Commission he had received a letter from Mr. Feerick about the recreational center and copies would be distri- buted to the Commission. 2. Sundstrom informed the Commission the Ord. #51 Adhoc Committee on a 16 to 8 vote recommend approval of Ord. 51 to the Metropolitan Airports Commission. And MAC at their meeting did adopt Ord. 51 thereby allowing restricted jet use of Flying Cloud Airport. B. Others • 1. Lynch informmed the Commission the Board of Appeals on a 3:1 vote did approve the land division referred to on the Commission's Minutes of Jan. 9, 1978, page 4, (division of a 4 acre tract into 2 two acre tracts). 2. Retterath informed the Commission she attended the Hustad Development Tour and Luncheon on Saturday. IV. REPORTS AND RECOiIMENDATIONS_ A. COR Investment, request to preliminary plat and rezone from Rural to Rt1 6.5 and Community Commercial approximately 19 acres in the Southwest corner of TH 5 and Co. Rd. 4. A continued public hearing. Bruce Knutson, Knutson Architects, briefly reviewed the COR proposal . He stated the plan conforms to the County and State Highway Department's recommendations. Sundstrom asked if the proponent had any questions or comments on the staff report. Knutson replied he did not have time to thoroughly review it, but would ask questions as the discussion proceeds. Chris Enger informed the Commission the 4/5 Study depicts the southwest corner , of Co. Rd. 4 and TH 5 as mixed residential and continuation of the existing gas station. He felt the 1978 Proposed Guide Plan's illustration of commercial at this corner reflects the existing gas station use, not additional commercial as COR proposes. Although, Don Brauer, Guide Plan Consultant, believes the COR proposal represents approximately the area outlined on the 1978 Guide Plan. • 191 approved Planning Cor:.:ission Minutes -2- Jan. 23, 1978 she Planner stated the Planning Staff is reconnnending Alternate A of the 4/5 Study for transportation and land uses of mixed residential and retention of the existing gas station. He believed the Guide Plan stresses community commercial uses throughout the City to serve neighborhoods, whereas this request would produce a concentration of commercial uses at a single intersection. He felt .f COR Investment's proposal is approved by the City, then extreme care should be given to the geometries of access and treatment between the commercial and duplex areas. • Sundstrom stated he believes Prairie Village Mall meets the neighborhood needs, and questioned why the proponent feels more commercial is needed by the neigh- borhood. Knutston replied the commercial sites would provide a variety of prepared foods for the residents of the City. The Planner stated as the request stands, the proponent is requesting rezoning without outlining the specific uses that may occur. If the site is zoned with unknown uses tied to the rezoning, anything might occur. Lynch did not feel the site should be commercial, especially when the types of commercial uses are unknown. Bearman expressed concern that approval of this request may produce the same development that is occurir.g at Mitchell Road and TH 5. Sundstrom asked if anyone in the audience had questions or comments. None were raised. Motion 1: • Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to close the public hearing on the COR Investment proposal. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 2: Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning requests of COR based on the following: 1. Traffic-although the new plan shows access to the site moved back from the intersection, 1200 ADT will certainly add to an • existing bad situation. 2. Poor mix of residential and commercial uses. The proponent has not addressed a sensitive transition between these uses on the site plan. 3. Circulation-the way in which traffic is brought through the site will leave the city with the same problems with truck traffic as currently exists at McDonalds. Headlight and noise problems for the residential units would be severe. 4. Land made available for commercial uses at this location has not been planned for, and significantly subtracts from the desirability of uses locating in other neighborhood centers or in the MCA, thereby increasing trips across town and not meeting needs of existing residents. 5. At such time as TH 5 is.no longer a regional facility, major emphasis of commercial may switch elsewhere, thereby leaving an intersection of deteriorating commercial uses in its wake. Motion carried unanimously. �::��P . • • • • • approved Planning Commission Minutes -2- •Dec. 12, 1977 B. COR Investment, request to preliminary plat and rezone from Rural t. :LM 6.5 and—Community Commercial approximately 19 acres in the Southwest corner of TH 5 and Co. Rd. 4. A continued public hearing. The Planner informed the Commission the staff and proponents met last week with the County and State Highway Departments and access.changes were suggested by the Highway Department. He stated the proponent is revising the plan and it is expected to be on the Jan. 9, 1978 Agenda. Motion: Retterath moved, Bearman seconded, to continue the public hearing on COR Investment to the Jan. 9, 197B Meeting. Motion carried unanimously. • • • • • 9: Minutes - Parks, Recreation and approved ' Vatural Reoourcos Cormission - 4 - Monday, Dec. 5, 1977 4. Renion.ai Trnils Flan (cont'd) 1•OTION: Tangen moved to include the following additions to the Regional Trail system within Eden Prairie as suggested by Manning Director Engeri Co. Rd. 1 west of Co. Rd. 4, Valley View Road, and a connection from Hopkins thru Bryant Lake Frrk to 62 Crosstown to Chanhassen and south to Valley View Road. }:ruell seconded, motion carried unanimously. wrens roeuested that the Staff present a review of our trail system to this la:.icission by the end of January, so we can take proper action at a future date and how it fits with the regional plans. • 5. S!orrlan:' !ana•cnent Ordinance :Jerts spoke to the Ordinance and its treatment of different types of lake- . shore, and to the three classifications of lakes by the State which are: • recreational dcvelopmentwaters, natural environment waters, and general development waters. Lruel.l questioned why the shoreline defined a body of water rather than low lying; areas and whether it meant that any low lying area would be subject to develornent. Anderson spoke to a standing invitation from Er. Gebhordt, Engineer for Riley/Purgatory Creck :•!atershcd District, to make a presentation at any time. Several questions were brought up regarding classification of lakes and lowland,& "Shoreline Profile" as contained in the Shoreland ;menage:sent Ordinance. I•:OTIOI:: Kin'-rey roved to table the first draft of the Shorcland Management Ordinance and direct the Staff to report back to the Coweission on the ques- tions listed above, seconded by Krue]1. i:otion carried unanimously. b. Deve1or:'.ent Frores_ls • a. 00R Investment .Jcrts spoke to the proposal which was located south of Eirhwny 5 and . ( west of Co. Rd. 4, end recommended a "cash park fee" and 8 ft. wide trail along Co. Rd. 4. MOTION: Tangcn moved to accept recommendation by alerts of a trail along Co. Rd. 4 and the "cash park fee" be applied to the gOR Investment proposal. Kingrey seconded, motion carried unanimously. b. Evrrrn Estates ' :Arts spoke to the Nygren Estates Iroposal located south of Hidden Ponds Ucve]olmcnt, recommending application of "each park fee" and right-of-way for a trail along Valley View Rd. IY'TION: Tangcn moved to accol t the Staff reco::naendation of "cash park fee" and trail rirht-of-way along Valley View Rd. for the Nygrcn Estates proposal. Kingrcy seconded, motion carried unanimously. 4)l MINUTES • EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION approved Monday, November 28, 1977 7:30 PM City hall COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sundstrom, Schee, Redpath, McCulloch, Retterath COMMISSION ABSENT: Lynch, Bearman STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger, Jean Johnson , I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Redpath moved, Schee seconded to add Harlan Perbix's 11-25-77 memo under Old Business and to approve the agenda as submitted and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 14, 1977 MEETING Redpath moved, McCulloch seconded, to approve the minutes as submitted. Motion carried 3:0:2 with Retterath and Schee abstaining. I II. . MEMBERS REPORTS A. Chairman Sundstrom 1. Sundstrom on behalf of the Planning Commission , and past Planning Commission members, extended thanks and appreciation for Oick Putnam's contributions over the past years. In recognition of his service and assistance, the Commission presented him with an engraved silver cup. Mr. Putnam thanked the Commission for the cup and stated he has thoroughly enjoyed his years with the City and the Commissions. IV. REPOR1S AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Nygren Plat. request to preliminary plat a 8 lot subdivision approved in 197E but never final platted. The area is zoned R1-13.5 and located South of Hidden Ponds and Valley Vicw Road. A public hearing. the planner referred the Commission to the Nov. 17, 1977 update memo and the original staff report of 7-22-76 . He stated the site is zoned for residential and and the staff is recommending approval of the plat as it conforms to the previous approved plat. Motion:_ moved, Retterath seconded, to close the public hearing and to recommend to . the City Council approval of the Nygren Estates preliminary plat 7-9-76. Motion carried unanimously. B. COR Investment Company, request to prelimnary plat and rezone from Rural to RM 6.5 and Community Commercial approximately 19 acres in the Southwest corner of Co. Rd. 4 and T.N. 5 for duplexes (46 units ) and 4 commercial lots. A public hearing. The planner informed the Commission the City Staff is still negotiating with the project planner, Mr. Knutson, in an effort to achieve the best transportation and lane uses for the site& todate no staff report has been completed. Mr. Bruce Knutson,Bruce Knutson Architects, stated they are proposing 4 conm ercial lots with access off a frontage road' 23 duplexes with access from Co. Rd. 4 and a buffer between the commercial and duplexes. He added they intend to construct a bikeway along Co. Rd. 4. Mr. Knutson stated he has talked with SuperAmerica relative to a joint zoning application to rezone the gas station site to Highway Commercial along with the COR request, but has not received positive response todate. He added he has also talked to the Morans&Miller Construction and has not received any objections. • 91y • approved Planning Coainission Minutes -2- Hov. 28,1977 • Sundstrom asked how close duplex lot /14 is to TH 5. Mr. Knutson stated the lot is setback 50' from the ROW and the lot's depth is 150 feet. The planner stated the '68 Guide Plan depicts this site as Commercial at the present gas station site, and the surrounding area as Multiple. He stated Rieke-Carrol- Muller is presently conducting a study on sanitary sewer plan for the area and corresponding road system. The planner believed 4 fast food restaurants , if built, would produce traffic problems at this intersection. Mr. Knutson stated they have a couple restaurants interested in sites and the other uses may be bank branches, etc. Redpath expressed concern that 4 fast food uses would produce traffic problems similar to Highway 7 and TH 101 and that a right-in/right-out would be the minimum improvement necessary. The planner stated the proponent has not requested a full access on TH 5, 1250' west of 4/5 intersection, but the staff is investigating the possibility with the highway department. He felt the 3 vital questions are: should there be commercial?, how much commercial?, and how should the site be served? McCulloch expressed concern that the intersection presently has traffic problems and the proposed plat by COR would create additional problems. Sundstrom questioned why commercial uses are not located behind the present ytis station and not along TH 5. M r. Knutson responded in previous discussion with City Staff it was felt commercial would not be appropriate along Co. Rd. 4 as it is residential in character. Retterath felt the commercial uses proposed would be more appropriate in the MCA. Schee concurred. Sundstrom asked if anyone in the audience had questions or comments. Mr. Putnam, 3045 Casco Piont Road, Mound, stated 1 intent of the 4/5 Study was to"down- play" commercial because of the traffic problems . In addition he felt the odors created by fast food centers would be offensive to the nearby residential if not controlled properly. He felt some commercial at the site would be viable , but not 4 . Motion: Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to continue the public hearing to the December 12th meeting and direct staff to prepare staff reports and other appropriate documents. • • 1000 17 --- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "" 320 Washington Av. South i ��.`7 Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 '.h4,oi HENNEPIN _.]-1... 935-3381 January 25, 1978 Mr. Chris Enger, Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Enger, RE: Proposed Plat - Cor Investment CSAH 4 - Southwest quadrant CSAH 4 and TH 5 Section 8 & 17, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 615 Review and Recommendation Thank you for submitting this plat for our review. We reviewed the proposed plat and have the following comments: 1. Dedicate an additional 10 feet of right of way for a total of 50 feet from and along the centerline of CSAH 4. 2. The location of the proposed access to CSAH 4 is acceptable. However, the developer must apply for and receive an approved entrance before beginning access construction. 3. As a condition to entrance permit approval, the developer must widen the existing taper on the west side of CSAH 4, to a full width lane from the proposed street to TH 5, and provide an acceleration lane from the proposed street to the south. 4. Entrance permit forms and information concerning access require- ments can be obtained by contacting Don Murphy, Traffic Division, 935-3381. 5. The proposed service road should provide access for both the parcel south of the service road and east of Lot 1, and for the Super America station. • HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal opportunity employer 100/ Mr. Chris Enger January 25, 1978 Page 2 6. All other construction within County right of way requires County Engineer approval before beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, utility and drainage construction (requires permits), trail development, and landscaping.- 7. All areas within County right of way disturbed during construction must be restored by the developer. • 8. The proposed access to TH 5 requires State approval. Close coordination with the State for this access is recommended. Contact J. S. Katz or Evan Green; Mn/DOT, Dio... 5, information. Please direct any response or questions on the above comments to Douglas Mattson at this office. • Sincerely, 1). • James M. Wold, P.E. Chief, Planning b Programming Division JMW:DBM:el cc: J. S. Katz P.E., Mn/DDT, Dist 5 ioo2 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant TIIROUGII: Chris Enger, Planning Director . DATE: Jan. 18, 1978 APPLICANT: C 0 R Investment LOCATION: SW corner of TH 5/ Co. Rd. 4 , 19.01 acres REQUEST: 1. Preliminary plat approval for 23 duplex lots and four commercial lots. 2. Rezoning from Planned Study to RM 6.5 and Community Cormrerci al . REFER TO: 4/5 Study 1968 Guide Plan 1978 Proposed Guide Plan • BACKGROUND 1 n fg7O honing Ordinance #135 rezoned the COR Investment proposal site from RM 2.5 and Highway Commercial to Planned Study (PS ). Said desig- 1970 nation not to be more than one year in duration as per Subd. 10.3,b, Ordinance 135. An approximate 15 month study was begun around January, 1974, to 1974 review and study various land use alternatives around the TH 5/Co.Rd. 4 1975 intersection. The study ended in March, 1975 with the City Council adopting the 4/5 Study as a reference document . ( Res. 957). The City Council rezoned the reverted zonings around the 4/5 intersection 1976 back to Planned Study through Ord. 332 passed May 4, 1976 and lapsing May 4, 1977. Again, the City Council placed the properties around the 4/5 intersection back into PS,(except NW corner where Prairie Village Mall is constructed). 1977 through Ord. 77-35 passed Nov.15, 1977, at which time the staff was directed to process all applications received on properties within the PS District. 1977 COR Investment filed application for development in October, 1977. LOCATION - L b%', 1 r, i \� t• 1 7rmber `� /�5 Lwlt co„ t;ww.S Staff Report-COR invt -2- Jan. 18, 1978 A mixture of uses are proposed for the site:commercial properties close to the 4/5 intersection and medium density residential on the south and west sides of the property. The 4/5 Study, adopted as a reference , explores residential and commercial uses but recommends mixed residential ; that is low, medium,and high density residential. The 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan follows this logic by showing low and medium density residential. Preliminary indication for the current Guide Plan Update indicates commercial close to the intersection with medium density residential surrounding it. The Superamerica gasoline station is on the very southwest corner of the intersection with COR Investment's proposal surrounding it on the south and west sides. • ZONING REQUEST The site is divided into 23 duplex lots and 4 commercial lots with zoning district changes requested to RM 6.5 and Community Commercial from Planned Study. All duplex lots are well over the 13,000 square foot require- ment, ranging from 13,500-17,075 square feet. The Community Commercial Zoning District requires a minimum zoning area of 5 acres and minimum lot 'size of 5 acres. The commercial lots requested would require a variance because the zo;,;ng area is 4.9 acres and "7- lot sizes are 1.27, 1.21, • 1.14 and 1.29 acres. Surrounding land uses are as follows:to the east is the Superamerica gasoline • station, currently zoned Rural but with a present rezoning request for Highway Commerical; to the south is Timber Lakes PUD, zoned RM 2.5 for high density residential; to the west is vacant land and several residences zoned R1-22 ; to the north , across Highway 5 is Prairie Village Mall zoned Community Commercial and vacant property zoned R1-22. The site is bordered on the north and east sides by Highway 5 and Co. Rd. 4 respectively. There are 23 duplex lots proposed with 46 units on 10.47 acres. This transforms to an overall density of 41i units / acre. The following are provisions of the RM 6.5 District: 13,000 square foot minimum lot size 30 ' front yard setback 10:25 foot side yard setbacks; one side, both sides 20 ' rear yard setback 6,500 square foot minimum site area per dwelling unit The following are provisions of the Community Commercial District: *5 acre zone area minimum *5 acre minimum lot size 35' front yard setback 20:40side yard setbacks; one side, both sides 10' rear yard setback * require variance from Zoning Ordinances N135. /0(11.1 EXCERPT: ORDINANCE 135 SECTION 7 Com-Commercial Districts Subd. 7.1 Purposes In addition to the objectives prescribed in Article I General Objectives, the Com-commercial districts are included in the zoning ordinance to achieve the following purposes: a) To provide appropriately located areas for retail stores, offices, service establishments, and amusement establishments. b) To provide opportunities for retail stores offices, service establishments, and amusement establishment, to concentrate for the convenience of the public and in mutually beneficial relationship to each other. c) To provide space for community facilities and institutions that appropriately may he located in commercial areas. d) To provide adequate space to meet the needs of modern commercial • development, including off-street parking and truck loading areas. e) To minimize trafficcongestion and to avoid the over-loading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings in excessive size in relation to the amount of land around them. f) To protect commercial properties from noise, odor, dust, dirt , smoke, vibration, heat glare , traffic, fire, explosion, noxious fumes and other hazards. • Subd.7.1.1. Special Purposes of Com-Commercial District a) To provide appropriately located areas for retail stores, offices and personal service establishments patronized primarily by residents of the immediate area. b) To permit development of community shopping centers of the size and in the appropriate locations shoran on the Guide Plan, according to standards that minimize adverse impact on adjoining residential uses. Subd. 7.3 Required Conditions • a) A11 uses shall comply with regulations precribed in Sec.2. b) Acceptable approved sanitary sewer service must be provided to all occupied structures and uses. c) Zoning request will be considered only on the basis of a comprehensive development plan for the entire area to be zoned and specific plans for initial structures and site development. d) Site and use area conditions. /03 Staff Report-COR Invt -3- Jan. 18, 1978 TRANSPORTATION Access, Circulation Access is gained to the site from two locations: one is a right-in/right-out on TH 5 about 1100 feet (335 m.) from the 4/5 intersection; the other is 450' (140m.) south of the 4/5 intersection on Co. Rd. 4. This plan shows shared access with Superamerica although the current Superamerica proposal does not agree with this shared access indicating one access from TH 5 and onefrom Co. Rd. 4. The circulation pattern with some modification seems to work relatively well, having a service road parallel to TM 5 and winding through the site to an intersection on the southern property line with Co. Rd. 4. This road would serve all 4 of the commercial lots. The most internal road on the plat T's into the through service road and serves all of the duplexes. Figure 1 illustrates the TH 5 access which the staff feels could be improved. The staff recommends that the 90degree corner be eliminated in favor of a less severe curve . This is to allow for easier traffic move- ment and to avoid another situation similar to Edenvale's commercial area at Mitchell Road and TM 5. Based upon 7.9 trips per day per unit for the duplexes;and 20 trips per day per 1,000 square feet gross floor area ant the floor area ratio allowed in Ord. 135, it is conceivable that this development could generate 1,200 ADT. This means that 800-1,000 trips could be added to TH 5 and 200-300 to Co. Rd. 4. The staff feels however that a only a portion of these predicted trips would actually be added to TH 5 and Co. Rd. 4 since many of the trips may be for more than one stop in the area. This does not preclude that this number of additional interactions will take place in this area; meaning that many of the predicted trips will occur in and around the intersection and the commercial areas on both sides of TH 5. Truck traffic into the commercial areas has not been addressed by the proponent. If trucks will be allowed, where will they park? If trucks arc not allowed, how can they be kept out? The staff feels that the access from TH 5 is not adequate for trucks because in negotiating two 90 degree corners in less than 100 feet. there are bound to be circulation problems. The residential road, which intersects the service road on the curve, may cause blind left hand turns coming from Co. Rd. 4 onto the residential road in front of vehicles moving south on the service road. The staff recommends that the residential street not intersect the service road on the curve due to the possible sigi distance problems diagonally across commercial lot #4.(Fig. 2). Another problem with this intersection is the short curve which precedes the residential road's intersection with the service road. This situation would inevitably lead to automobiles stopped at the intersection with the rear of the car in the other lane. ( See Fig. 3) Lots 14,15, I, and 23 are sited poorly in relation to the commercial lots and the commercial traffic. During the day and of night trucks and cars will be passin by these lots continuously , and after dark will be shining headlights directly at the units. (see landscaping section). Staff Report-COR Invt -4- Jan, 18, 1978 SOILS The soils are generally sandy loam in texture with slopes of no greater than 12% . The bearing capacity and shear strength of all the soils are good&have a low susceptibility to frost action. Erosion control is very important in this development because of increased runoff due to roofs, sidewalks , and streets and the extremely erosive nature of the soils. Erosion control shall take place according to Riley/Purgatory Watershed District recommendations. LANDSCAPING__ Because of the differing land uses proposed adjacent to one another in this proposal, and the apparent undesirableness of this situation in proximity, the staff feels that screening should occur between all commercial and residential lots. In addition, lots 14,15, 1 and 23 should have screens for noise and visual purposes to help alleviate the problems of commercial traffic previously dis- cussed. These screens should be in the form of earth berming and dense evergreen planting to provide a year around effectiveness. Details of this screening should be worked-out with the staff prior to any final approvals. PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM A bikeway/hikeway is planned for Co. Rd. 4 on the west side, and in the same sense that Prairie Village Mall built a section of the trail, the staff feels that COR Development should he responsible for building the portion of the trail contained in their site. This trail shall be constructed 8 feet wide and of 4 inch deep strength asphalt, according to the specifications for the trail , and have right of public use. LAND USE The Planning Staff feels that the land use issue is the most important consideration in this proposal. With the neighborhood commercial center already across TM 5 and the Superamerica station on the corner, additional commercial on this intersection would only add to the TM 5 traffic situation, running at or near capacity now. As an east/west arterial, TM 5 is the only route moving peak traffic flows through Eden Prairie to the east in the am, and west in the pm. The staff considers the commercial uses presently at the intersection to have ful- filled the planned commercial capacity. There are other sites in the City where commercial uses are needed and would be much more appropriately located. It is the opinion of the staff that the commercial development of this corner would set an undesirable precedent for strip commercial development in the City. Staff Report-COR Invt. -5- Jan. 18, 1978 How Much Commercial ? The 1.968 Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts a commercial area on the southwest corner of theintersection of 4/5 which represents the existing Superamerica. The 1975 4/5 Study shows the .86 acre Superamerica station remaining. This Study shows no further commercial in this quadrant, but, rather mixed residential. At the time of Prairie Village Mall's approval, it was done on the basis that this would be the extent of additional commercial for the 4/5 intersec- tion. This was intended to meet the needs of the neighborhood. The 1968 Guide Plan and all planning since then has been based upon the basic concepts of : 1. THE MCA being the "downtown" area of the community for regional types of commercial uses. 2. Village sectors surrounding the MCA were to each have • neighborhood centers to serve neighborhood needs. These centers were t.o have been made-up of : church, school • park, library, city services , and neighborhood commercial. Several areas of town are approaching the point where there is need for these uses in their neighborhood. The Planning Staff feels that approval of the CDR proposal of four commercial sites would be detrimental to the City of Eden Prairie for the following reasons: 1. Traffic-although the new plan shows access to the Site moved back from the intersection, 1200 ADT will certainly add to an existing bad situation. 2. Poor mix of residential and commercial uses. The proponent has not addressed a sensitive transition between these uses on the site plan. 3. Circulation-the way in which traffic is brought through the site will leave the City with the same problems with truck • traffic as currently exists at McDonalds. Headlight and noise problems for the residential units would be severe. 4. Land made available for commercial uses at this location has not been planned for, and significantly subtracts from the desirability of uses locating in other neighborhood centers or in the t1CA, thereby increasing trips across town and not meeting needs of existing residents. 5. At such time as TH 5 is no longer a regional facility , major emphasis of commercial may switch elsewhere, thereby leaving an intersection of deteriorating commercial uses in its wake. !oo7 Staff Report-COR Invt. -6- Jan. 18, 1978 The Planning Commission may choose to take action on any of the following alternatives: A. Recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat dated Dec. 14, 1977 and rezoning to Community Commercial and RM 6.5. 8. Request the proponent to redo the plat with changes to the frontage road and screening recommend by the Planning Staff. C. Deny the project on basis of items 1-5 on page 5 of the Jan. 18, 1978 staff report. • D. Continue the project until the Commissions and Council have reached a consensus on the 1978 Guide Man designation of this area. The Commission may wish to request a change in the proposed Guide Plan to coincide with the 4/5 Study. The Planning Staff recommends Alternative D. JEJ/CE:jmj • • 1j IOO ' • VOW.NICrft1.Y ._.---�- WO v STAFF REPORT FIGURES ArgTM: c 1 / ,5 , COR Investment 412 ,, IC Jan. 18, 1978 8� z—" '" azow e Gofh • , _,Filoc, 11 it „__ ......._ , ..,__ .__ • • i . 1 LD , 2..'V / .z, t 4WPEtill/ - i� ` 4F VIDE •vokeal • ./\ //RoAp 1 2 1 1 ; VLv 1 ,78:25° 1 1 1 , i GoMo itGiAt. Lof A- 1 1.- i 0 1 , 1 ..._ _ 1 O O �o ° 51 I. `•• Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed Distric t_ ,l `-ice 0 8950 COUNTY ROAD 1\1i� .. EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 553 i . 'LIl`�2 ::::kr1 December 8, 1977 Mr. Chris Eager, City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 • Re: Cor Development Dear Mr. Eager: The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory Creek Ratershed District have reviewed the preliminary plat and storm sewer plan for the above referenced project as submitted to the District by Eden Prairie. The following policies and criteria of the District are applicable to this development: 1. The Managers note that the preliminary plat plan shows lots platted into Mitchell Lake. Platting into public waters is contrary to District policy and will not be approved. 2. A grading and land alteration permit must be obtained from the Watershed District for this project. The permit appli- cation must be acco;apanied by an erosion control plan showing how sediment will be prevented from leaving public waters during construction. 3. A detailed storm sewer plan must he submitted to the District for review and approval. Since surface water runoff from this development is directly tributary to Mitchell Lake, the District requests that upland storage of surface runoff be used prior to discharge into Mitchell Lake. If you have any questions regarding the District's comments, please con- tact us at 920-0655. Sincerely, i it 1 n Allan Cehhard BARR ENCINEERlNC CO. Engineer for the District AC/sb cc: Mr. Frederick Richards '��i1 j, Mr. Conrad i'iskneaa l/ tl.. Reit,-r. Pant.en - May 2, 1978 MEMORANDUM TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA FROM DAVID HUSBY - RCM ASSOCIATES, INC. A meeting with residents along Luther Way was held on April 25, 1978 to discuss possible alternative road systems in connection with the proposed Round Lake Trunk Sewer and Watermain Project. Schematic drawings of several alternates (attached Alternates 4 through 9) were reviewed and Alternates 10 and 11 were developed during the discussions. Alternates 4 and 5 were not acceptable to Luther Way residents because of the temporary connection and the uncertainty of future Valley View Road alignment and time schedule. These were also not acceptable to the developers of the Savaryn property (Parcel 6420) because of the circuitous access route to the east side of the parcel. Alternates 6 and 7 were generally unacceptable because of the temporary connection but there were inaications that Alternate 6 would not be too in i -2- undesirable if the temporary connection could be eliminated. Alternates 8 and 9 were not acceptable to Luther Way residents because of the greater number of added units which would use Luther Way. Alternate 10 was developed as a feasible solution which, while not unanimously acceptable, appears to be the least objectionable. It would provide reasonable access to the east side of the Savaryn property without . adding an excessive number of units to Luther Way extended and would provide two access points for the Round Lake Estates area in addition to the Heritage Road/Highway 5 intersection. • Alternate 11 was developed after the meeting as a good road system from the standpoint of overall traffic circulation. It is probably unacceptable to the Luther Way residents although it would provide alternate outlets during those times when heavy traffic congestion is experienced at the Luther Way/County Road 4 intersection. In Summary, it is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of Resolution 78-62, amended as follows: (1) The proposed extension of Luther Way across Parcel 6420 (Savaryn property) as described in the February 21, 1978 feasibility report be deleted from the project. 1/12 -3- (2) Any future extension of Luther Way shall be limited to that shown schematically as Alternate 10. (3) The proposed extension of the trunk sewer and watermain shall be ordered, with final alignments in routing to be determined in conjunction with the platting to be approved for Parcel 6420 and the Round Lake Estates 2nd and 3rd Additions. (4) A road connection shall be made, in conjunction with the watermain construction, to West 72nd Street (or Valley View Road, if in place) to provide an alternate access to the Heritage Road/Trunk Highway 5 intersection. II13 I Ea i "il ifi ..'; ; 1 ___-.J L-..1-..- ....-.11-1--6--,1- ---zs...-7,77.1 2 , i 1 in 111 II 1 I Ii0 /, • .... ....a..- i ' 1111 • a i// - a . , l'17 iii WO i t 6' C...,/ / 114 /1111 6 . ---il ?.'"77?'..:- L----•-ri .,..... ....... ... ...... . r.... ; 1 5 % r, 1,, . I. g 1,2 :-...:•:::::::::•::•:::::•::•:•:•:•:•::- 1 Liji, 1Z317) . o •i\1 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::.:::::::::::•:::::•:::::•:•: 1 I *•••••••••••••t••••••••........%;):,:•:••••.-::::•:-:•:•:•:; ii ••••:•.:••••••••)•-:::::::•::•:s..:::::::::•:•:-:-:•::• // ::::::::::31:-:::•:•:::••••••••••v" /f • r- •i.1'c--7 ' i .•• ••••'.-;:.....:•:.. !, ;&tilt ....:.:!/... _..... i r'- ' 3 -- 41kiitT4. 11 r: .." ...A ,' i , - r •t..... _ , , -,...,..N.• 41 4" 4 14 \\\\\\\ ----1;:l z-' \\ '_1•.i 1. --i \--i k.' .1: '1.:t‘r -"is-;';- '''`''' . \ i I •,e11--4..."" -:.1-nf 3---±a___-71 \ ' I -— ...as,— .— -----!.,-.;-. 7:-,:,-..-,-.-svx--nr;as.,._-_:.,:..-.'.:wz.,-.5.---•- --...z:2--..-L......a....- -.......;---- ---......-.--.,,.:., -......,:in 4.-. ............,--..,-2-...........77.7-7-..77 _'"'77°....7'!"iY'f.175-7,71...4'r''''77.!.:•1"7•71",,,,,,wrrelnrisq:,-***.mr,......7,-.111:„.........„,,,,, „,...,,....: ,..,:,......,_:,..,......t",,,,,B 1 'r,:!..,..-.4 ...................../ .......................1 ................s.a.--7.:1., a F1.---74---1,.... 1 i ) III f 1 V .// .a. 1 -i'-I • / 111 , /‘ -.0--••-•..-. -J al raw* 52 i r t ,,, ey/ 4// i :Ike .....,...f..7.,... . .------ --- -----/- ..:.::::. .:.::.:.:.:::.:::::::::: . • - , i ::::::::::::::z: ..... ......... ... ........• ,, . i. . ,1 .:::::::::::.....: .....::.::.„::................:. Mr ----_g , 0 1, :•• ...: :. :::::,:.::::•:::::::::, ... . . .... . ........ ,,,,,/. -.:::........1:.::.::,::.::.::::...„::.... _.,,,y, .• iista, r......?..\--- ,................. -4 ‘ i ti i e;ii- )r-1 Agit ilar ' i ,ii • -"lip \N. •Wr .J ig It 4. — Ou1-' i I 1 i 1— -""` - , •Ni.--, o., V • I % '' ,th - „I-‘• .- r I '' ‘tei i" 1, �- [,.__ 1 + ! , _:, , r r ,,� —t // --r , ,, hi 2 . /. —, ,____ -1 .t- _in r z ^-a 1 r 1 ia 4F r:i":::::: ... .... 5 !I :::.�,::::::::::::. w. ts\. r--1-r-(N 41. , . ----\ N ,, ,/,/i/ ., .% , ...., sr.. ,•., ,..-c.,--c_iti, . , : II ` , f r F . C .< 9 4� - : .a- 7-, -- - r fl: r 1 • i ! i1 4 Li ) ; Y svw. • / r '!:':f^fit',,,• { I `!, `CI>f* W iL 1 1 {i i J vtt,.- 't �^1`A>1r^i-. \J �_ --- it:Ini t:71.I(,::1—L-I------'!::::`:=7:•=t--;:--,:... .1---.=:-;ti---___.-_-_--liv--, • : F ,-,,:„..„3.......,...„,, ...._.... , , ..._ , ati ) -td i . C ___ t•-1 •-•44...r-+ raimirmr:„./. :I /,..- ./ .4c-ji _.„ :,,... a t clie #_____7..1.2. - it/ - ' i • i ..,,..7".•77-77!",„ ,7.-.:4÷•:::,.,:•i•i•,: ..-.'.47.-..1.--- • ....... ............... „/i ...:::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::.:.!•.;::::i:::::::. :. 0 1 i i pc ;.:4 i ::::::::::::::.:.:-:.:•:::::::: :::.:,:•.......-. >1 .•...:....:'.:,...:;-::X•:•..::.e,,,::::•:•:*:...'.•..:::::. 1... ___ 0- tau') 4,\ ::::::::::::::::::::.':•:•::-:•:::•:::::.•:•:-:•:•:•:-:-:-:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•. in . ill •:•:::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•::•:-..:.•:•::::::',;;N:::::::•:•:•:•:•:::::::•:•:-:•: _____Li t• . • • . I 1 •:•:•:•::/.•:•:•:-:-::::......-...•,..:.•.:................•.......;...• E • I/ .....:. .....- ........... . ,............ , ......... ......... ......... , ' " ••••::.-:::::::::::::::::•:::;, /-4"--L-- •••-k—k-z/ J••:1; -:,,,..),. --___.___ :..........„,--....... <C-/-IP-1--1- ‘ . > • /i ....,-1—\---c--("S:---- • - se---'-, 19 i'dc') 1 1 9,11-7, ‘f_.,k' •,..‘y,_‘':--4,1 ‘4-,-1-,,-J,-,,- •,,• -.,. Ii......,-ai. .ti---":1- ./ 11...........,.....j L.1.-.....--1-.1 U-.),J t—L----) .....:, —1 1 i ( 1 I . f . co, t . ii —, • i'I : / / ( ___ I— J -4(...4 a /:77- —— _1 i a- '.;•!. ii . // .4 ..- , IV Y_ '1.-7;z- - if .• in —er . 4/ ... 1 . ci•/ . / •••••• -.._. ......-_-.... _._ . • ....... ................ ...... ................ i . j/ .•:•:•:•:•:•:::::.:.•:•:•:•::::(:i•:•:•:•:•:::.:..... i•-..1 I .:::::::'::.:::::::: . 4:::::::::::::::::::::•. i i 5cc o • >I I •:::::::::::::;::::: ::::::::::::: ::::.::::,::::::::::::::. C): i.._... 1-: = W IA 4\ :::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. 0 : .4\1 ::.......,:,:....... ........................... \k..... .."6 ci. . ..,.. .... ........ ....... ..... ........ ........... .. \\\ ......... I/ -::::....:.:. ...-:....:-..:...w:::::.....-....-..• / :.:::::::::.::::::::::::::c4-:•:-:-::::::. -r ,-(1-\--7- 1 '•i \ --------1/. ' .--':::141......:I.::::....... el ,, ..------\\: . ti,, I. f II -f et/ 1 , / .--7:4Y.•:Tr.. ,-,„ ,i 1...... -1 1 I I.; 1 1 :::.,..::::.I.:•:•:::.:: :•:. .,.. t t :::.:::: •-....-.....:::t.,:::::::::.:: 01 fr is, • , 0•— , /i r i ::::::::::1::::::::::::: :::':::::::::::::::: - )1 f • , - —vv.'!.....;., L.,' •r-Z 11' ''''';\:\`' ---------LL"...,---. "::••*--:-to ,- :;:r fli *****0 0 W in 0- / ii/ \-\\ ------ : /''h --1- • A 1\ ;L.:';-;—•"-- (i'',%,,i: A'f• r -,...;;;:.-l'r i,./..:.4 rt,c.....- 3#--,- ,,,,•a•-,'' 1-7‘. 1- • N.t. --, -‘,1 . '- I s Vtv ±, ,.....,----,,,,,,..,,,, 1 L.) u i LI jj i....L..............--.../ u_,‘....,...,..:_:-.5 E...,—../..._,.......— .......,....._ _...,..... .a................. Ili — • • t 0 ------; /.. a . . 1.7// / It . .... ... . .. . .. .. • .....'. I: :.:::A:::::::•::•:•: C-17 L ...), F, x cr \k ::::::::.-:::::::::::: ::::::•::'::':::'..:.:::::i:::::.::: ....'—‘t w°W-0 r 4\t ....•:•:::.•:....,:,::::.........:.6i ::•:::. 0 .. -A5 i . 0 /, —•,-(/,...,,., , , _E_.... , • APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATIO1i AND NATURAL RESOURCES CO)NISSION MONDAY, APRIL lD, 1978 7:30 PM, CITY EAI.L SPECIAL)' TING • laMERS PRISE?TPz Chairman Richard Anderson, Steve Fifield, William Garens, Robert Johnson and Robert Eruell } 22•i3}:RS EXCUSED: David Anderson and George Tangen c. Raven Rid7e Lambert spoke to the recommendation made by the Planning Commission Report, specificially to the pedestrian trails connecting with other trails. Eruell felt there were some developments in Edcnvale uhich have been approved end constructed, but no cash park fee has been collected. Lambert agreed to 3ook into this. • Anderson expressed concern for materials to be used on the trails, referring • to past u:,.. of materials that have nrt held up. 1e asked whether the City is obligated to allow them to use the same ground cover, speaking to the Bike-way/Efl cway Task Report's specifications for community trails. Iinutes - Parks, Rec. and approved l:atural Resources Coranissien — 3 — ronday, April 10, 1978 c. Raven Ridre (cont'd) Lambert questioned whether the City could ask for a change in the middle of a trail system. Garens comr.ented that the homeowners do not want trails, elthough he felt that trails on the west side of the railrond tracks would not be a problem. �14 MOTION: Eruell moved that we recommend to the Council that the pedestrian lath•aly be incorporated into the developer's proposals sal ndcthatdd that the constructi n action • be the current residential type construction. t tt ,• , /"v.' )- t.�.ile ;ti itit;:harry C,.—v ,li , at,Les!wd ,kti•ict ',. Si .r�) .. ,0,-,0 COt IN 1 Y ROAD -4 . Z, ` 1; � F-IDEN PRAIRIE.MINNI.SUiA ',S)•13 I. 1, } y 4, April 5, 19J8 • Mr. Chris Pn• er City Pl:o,n,,r City of I'.hn rt.oirio ;,)`,D ',i..,t 1`r..Iri. .•,d Pdcn pralrio, Mini-,:eta 3,3',4 Re: Raven R i.l,;c Subd i v i rt i.on — fd,•uvale Dear Mt. '.o,;t•f: The cngineeriug advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley--Purgatory Creek Cator',b.•l District b::vc revi,•v.••d the preliminary plan es submitted to lie District for lhr above referenced project'. The following policies and criteria of Iho District .nr applicable to this project. 1. A y,r.oiin„ and Lori alteration pc omit roust he obtained from the I)i:;i i i,- for this project. '.n or,.•t.,o control plan out 1 ining him :;r,lir,ir•nt will be prevr•nto.d from leaving the cen,Orntien .;ito both dollop, construction dud alter constrt ion ”must. „be subillod along 1 ,j with the permit ;tpplic:tilon. i 2. A detailed :storm newer pins must he submitted to the District for review and .tpproval. th.utk put for the opl,or(tunity to r0 t:.t1.•uturn Ihi:; d,•vclohutcnt. if yell hive j' icy ;u.•,;1 ions r,••.•,:udinl; the District's cr,,.. nts, phet,:o cenlaet ns at 920-06)5. • Sincerely, 00,,, Allan C,•hlttrd RANI: I NCI Ni l-ilINM CO. Engineer for the Ui:Iriot AC/Ill r,•: ;Ir. Conrad Pi'dsness hir. l'irderirk Ri.hiisis t Pii. Donald Peterson '!+ 9 MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COittMISSION approved Monday, March 27, 1978 '7:30 PM . City Hall COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sundstrom, Retterath, Dearman, Lynch, Levitt, - — _ Recpath, licCulloch arrived 7:40 COMMISSION A;SENT: none STAFF PRESENT Chris Enger, Planning Director; Jean Johnson Planning • Assistant • I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Lynch moved, Beaman seconded, to approve the agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. II. NINNIES OF THE MARCH 13, 1978 MEETING P. 5, add P at bottom - The Planning Commission discussed the immediate • availability of sewer on certain sites vs. open land not yet planned for sewer. Dearman moved, Lynch seconded, to recommed approval of the minutes as submitted and corrected. Motion carried 5:0:1 with Retterath abstaining. • III. MEMBERS REPORTS General discussion took place regarding present day decisions that alter • past years of plenning. IV. REPORTS AND REC :!ENDATIONS_ A. Raven Ridge, Edenvale Inc., request for rezoning and platting of approximately 14 acres for 22 single family and 24 townhouses. The site is located on Outlet V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, east of Hipp's Cedar Point Townhouses. A continued public hearing. The Planner informed the Commission Mr. Peterson is unable to attend the meeting .• this evening, but he has conveyed his concurrence with the staff report dated March 16, 1978 . The Planner stated the request is for less density than originall approved on this site which was approximately 6 units/acre. Retterath inquired hew many lots are proposed less than 13,500 square feet . The Planner was unsure of the exact number, but stated the average lot size is 15,500 square feet. Sundstrom inquired w`.at the single family portion density, and overall project density are. The Planner replied the single family is 2.6units/acre and the overall density is aLout 3.05 units/acre. Sundstrom asked if a•yone in the audience had questions or conments. None raised. Motion 1: • Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to close the public hearing on Raven Ridge preliminary plat. N..tion carried unanimously. Motion 2: royal of Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council app the rezoning request from Rural to R1-13.5 and 814 6.5 based upon the staff report dated 3/16/78 and the Engineer's recommendations of 3/17/73. Motion carried unanimously. . 12tj\ • • • approved Planning Commission -2- March 27, 1978 Motion 3: • Redpath moved, Rettcrath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat of Raven Ridge dated Jan. 1978 for 24 townhouse and 22 single family lots based upon the staff report of 3/16/78 and the engineer's recommenda- tions of 3/17/78. Motion carried 6:1Sundstrom voted nay due to the density in R1-13.5 District. . - . • a 0 3/17/78 • ENGINEERING STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RAVEN RIDGF Supplement to 3/16/78 Planning Staff Report 1. Plat a 9' radius along property lines at all street intersections and cul-de-sac returns to provide sufficient R/W for utility installations. 2. Some changes are required on the preliminary utility plans regarding the proposed watermain. These changes are noted on the Engineering Department's copy of the preliminary plans. • 3. The Developer shall submit a finalized development plan prior to Final Plat approval or building permit issuance which shall show proposed grading, storm %later drainage area and direction of flow, preliminary uitlity plans, pondirg and floodplain high water levels for 100 year storm and minimum floor elevations for all lots. 4. Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District review will be required prior to Preliminary Plat approval. 5. Street grades shall not exceed 7.5%. 6. Assessment information: The following assessments have been levied: #5858, trunk sewer and water, S19,816.00 #6732, Edenvale Streets, 9,479.99 CJJ:kh • STAFF REPORT: TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant THROUGH: Chris Enger, Planning Director DATE: March 16, 1978 APPLICANT: Edenvale Inc. ' PROJECT: Raven Ridge LOCATION: The site is a 13.73 acre parcel of land located in Edenvale on Out lot V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, directly east ofEdenvale Boulevard and west of Edenvale 11th Addition. • REQUEST: PUD Development Stage Approval Preliminary plat approval of 22 single family lots and 6 quadraminium lots. Rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 `„ BACKGROUND: - The site was originally approved as part of Edenvale PUD 70-04 as medium density housing with a density of n.i: ....e than 5.8 units/acre. The project proposed reducing the density to 3.05 units/acre. The project is consis- tent with surrounding residential uses and agrees in concept with the prelim- Figure 1 , inary indication on the current Guide Plan Update, where it is designated L. O C A T I O N MAP f low density residential. By defini- t''' \,�,," / i rch tion, low density in the Guide Plan p ;- f F. \_ . Lakq fi,'17...• is 2.0-3.5 units / acre. The 1968 �l yiT� ;?� /...,v-s.:�/,+-• :a.4 j, Guide. Plan shows this area as single f1 •` �3 "` I' family residential. V ,../ ' U� �. l la' , , 'I The site is bordered on the west by ✓"n.!— - 14 u, p Edenvale Boulevard, on the east by ' ' 1 f1dd. - lu-u+ \� kl ; �, Edenvale 7th Addition, on the north- i �� i east by Edenvale 12th Addition, on IN Sf n , tile_ sr.,", ; i !: the Southeast by Edenvale 10th .__I . ._\, er I i�••*�• Addition, and is adjacent to Hipp's �t,il.l er@st^v' lOtll',i4. 1'llill r`'". Cedar Point Townhouses on the 1 \ Huts northwest. s' _ •< / '2 .'''' FP :t\ 4-: k el , 11:4,,:i 4'1.2.1-1*,Crq1V.2 421:r:.••litt•d•f(71.‘''''.:'-- \"C'•:'1":27 i `'t •-• j 7 UU till el 9-9 • 1••" ,i, ... . .- . .1 • Staff Report-Raven Ridge -2 - March 16, 1978 ZONING RCQl1FST The proponent requests rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 . Zoning Ordinance 135 defines the zoning district as "attached dwelling units and accessory structures". The following are provisions of Ord. 135 for tic RM 6.5 District: Minimum lot area 13,000 square feet 30 foot front yard setback 10-25 foot minimum sideyard setback; are side,both sides 20 foot rear yard setback 6,500 square foot - minimum site area per dwelling unit Lot sizes for the single family detached area range from 11,700 square feet to 26,800 square feet, and average 15,500 square feet. The overall density is 3.05 units/gross acre. The Planning Staff recommends that the townhouse and single family portions of the plat be toned to RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 respectively. Access, Circulation • Raven Court is the road serving the 22 single family lots, gaining access from lioodhill Trail. The townhouse lots are all served by a road off of • Edenvale Boulevard. Edenvale Boulevard is shown to be a collector road on the Guide Plan Update, with future connections to the east across • FAI 494 to Shady Oak Road. This future connection would provide a needed link across 494 for the entire northern half of the community and give a more direct access to Bryant lake Park, a designated regional recreation resource,( see figure 2). Raven Court has only the one access and two cul-de-sacs serving the single family units. Seven of the single family lots are double fronted both on Raven Court and on Noodhill Trail and Edenvale Boulevard. Although this is an undesirable situation the parcel configuration and topography almost • dictated the road and lotting patterns. It is estimated that upon completion the project will generate about 355 one way automobile trips per day ( ADT ). Based upon 8.5 ADT / single family detached unit, and 7 ADT / townhouse unit. All of these trips will end up on Edenvale Boulevard and Valley View Road. It is expected that about half or more of the trips will end up on TM S with the remainder on Co.Rd. 4. • • I II?(1 Staff Report-Raven Ridge -3- March 16, 1978 ;ig.5.5 1990 Thoroughfare Plan epErtvr*4 ei.-VV't SolLS,TOPOGRAPHY,GRADING 1 \\//' ra R The site is made up of a gently ' ,••- •' t j .•'� • �.•• %--,, \ undulating knoll in the general - t • ` 11 `'•'�t. • vicinity of Raven Court in the e.�, sr.'1, single family area and on the �? ^� north and east side of the site. The site drops off r�.^'r` w 1- sharply about SO'to the west ,r^;�'r -m / :tl -� �, . :-'. .. and south towards Ldcnvale ) • -.f� ..�� \' 1 {. Boulevard with slopes of op to j `• t, ' 1 - „ i 1:1 Generally however the ' ! •' .-:7': /\_s 7"t t �. w slopes are 3:1 or less, that �r�' �� _, f,.j „-;z.t : , Y. "�{c�,i- r i r. ,. },u;, is 3 horizontal feet for every • ' 1ar•",'i,✓'�' "•11,.;.- • „'\ _)•,_1' - __ ... 1 foot rise vertically. .. r� \. ��'+.,;� r`'----\- o - The coils on the site are gin y � �. orally made up of the lleyder A `\ �=. • . R ` and Hayden series, being loamy .......,.. .c• - in texture, deep, moderately ,, - permeable, and well drained. t-- ='�'- s These soils are quite erosive \ `"" so c'rasi nn cc::'sal should be v - implemented during construe p tion to attenuate unneeded soil legend: eb76u �jlegend' loss. These soils have a fair bearing capacity and shear ,o principal alter; .. `_- - �• In Iern,edleie a strength, and moderate shrink n,mor niu,a+ ,.,, •^^" is swell hazard. Fairly wide conrcto, c ..• , • " footings will he required. net, P.::' , Other soils found on the site Fd !� ^ ';:; /'/rY , 3'\) in smaller quani ties are }laurel � r� �i L-J\'; +"(j/L lt-,,-' l �' L, t: and Marsh. The Hamel soils are e cs � f '�t. ^e poorly drained and high in clay ,,,e /1.,.,,•• �,. , y�1 content. The water table may 1 „,r ,'�✓A� \`��� �,,:°S 5o uv! be near the surface during wet ', r �� i,..,,• r('L.. periods of the year. These �� �_ o/r � ) KI 1` -'of the tmrnhousc units on the t,en , ter ti.'e� J , tea:._ lower port ion of the parcel. • �, 1 +c \ The Marsh soils are found only �� \\ (� \�l+rr-';`.,J n•�t , `• 1 , a,C \Ad • in small quamty on the site { , �` -.�� fr -%�° �/ and are located at the toe of I .+�•��'.�ti) " 1� ii'L the slope in the approximate t� �- c l .w-c ( - vic:ntt)' 01 the townhouse road • "o \J' ;wil � .,•' 7-/ „., and parking areas. I xcavation I ^�ru Mtn ,, ` .' of several feet to remove organ- ,• -- < • r is soils wi)1 have to occur o e't'� 1 with the back Ii11 heir of a o,c o u:+ f//.r.•r.• u.n granular material, g - �� � � ,......y.......:\.,:� l i? • Staff Report-Raven Ridge -4- March 16, 1978 Bearing capacities and shear strength for the Hamel soils on the townhouse site are fair to poor and the hazard of frost heave is high. Careful site design and construction should be followed for the prepara- • tion of the townhouse site. Very little grading is to be done on the site in the initial road and utility installation. The sensible treatment of the site will make it possible to retain most of the wooded character and help create a pleasant residential area. The Engineering Staff have determined that all lots should be graded from the street to the front lot line at about 2% for ease of utility installation in road right-of-ways. VEGETATION The site is heavily wooded with upland hardwood species. A substantial amount of the vegetation will have to be removed in lot and road construction. The grading required is a minimum, so few trees will have to be removed in backsiope areas. Seeding and sodding should be done immediately fol- lowing construction to stablize slopes. All elm trees marked for Dutch Elm Disease on the site should be removed prior to April i�1978. • PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION \ :\j".:::7:::.• • A pedestrian pathway is /r • .,"�<�i >\\--:\ `41. proposed between the single •\ \' `' = family area and the town- t„: • •I \ � n • ,:;,7�.,, ��,\ houses and Ilipps Addition r �` � on Outlot A. This will ��j: • �; n` � join trails in the 10th and 1 , \\ \• : ti '� 7th Additions to the south 4��-"� `� \" •• ' •' b. and the ]Ath Addition to1-V---, \ • r �\ the north. The trails lead !. %\� ,1 • K. `�"` raJ 1 1• to a pedestrian•underpass ,\ . ._�' t` a• ,.'� 1-�'! ,y I 1. with Edenvale Boulevard and ` r ;,•'}�. t '-ti _j 1 ; `r connects to the school/park '`+>-• ..::.:c-1 1 �,? site on the west side of \\ \r•� .r•i ( t .T. :1 ' )1 — the road. The trails will — —t ;;A-_-,...- be maintained through the / ,i' homeowner's association \ .:\� ,}; L •: • 3. 636 44j ,', ,,.. ..n '- , .0. sq TPC:118 N,: - ... v e,\•.,,,. f: - •,',-"k \ '� • OLY[IOPNCNT ►BAN N. RAVEN RIDGE •' • Staff Report-Raven Ridge -5- March 13, 1978 ADDITIONAL SITE CONSIDERATIONS According to Ord.178 all parking areas for multiple dwellings must be screened from public roads by the use of vegetative plantings, earth berms or other methods. The staff recommnends the proponent place screening between l:dcnvale Boulevard and the parking lots and roads of the townhouses. Earth berms in conjunction with tree and shrub plantings work the best a}xlprovide the year around effect desired. The proximity of the proposed townhouse units to the Hipps Townhouses has been discussed. The units arc within the sideyard setback for lot 1. The staff recommends that additional tree plantings take place between the existing and proposed townhouses to lessen the impact of the adjacent locations. N /`,U. . 1 i J c`N : ;;;;;;:..7:1;21-1... :Z:S.;:::;;I: . ( . ,\ _ -- } \ -�1 t- _ u "� ti T 1 — c. • '4-� F7_s I/[V 0 i2...) '. ..,* •'...•>/..:,..:::.F.: ';1_ .•-_.i/I DCVC•OPMCNT PLAN \ RAVEN RIDGE //�. • •• ••• ....Oa fly COUNVAII ii Staff Report-Raven Ridge -6- March 13, 1978 RECOM1ENDATIONS • The staff recommends approval of the requests as follows: • 1. Rezoning from Rural to kM 6.5 for 24 townhouses units, and from Rural to R1-13.5 for 22 single family units with lot size variance. 2. Preliminary plat approval for 22 single family detached lots and 6 townhouse lots contingent upon the following: a. the proponent excavate all organic soils near the townhouse site and backfill with a coarse, granular material. b. soil erosion control measures be taken during all utility, • road, and home construction to prevent excessive soil loss. Ground covers should be established in all disturbed areas immediately following construction. c. berms should be constructed along with tree plantings to screen the townhouse parking areas from Edenvale Boulevard. d. all elm trees marked for Dutch Elm Disease should be removed prior to April 15, 1978. e. that an outlot be left for pedestrian trail to be constructed as shown in figure 4, connecting to the existing trails to the north and south. f. additional tree and shrub plantings should be done between existing Hipps Cedar Point Townhouses and the proposed townhouses as a visual and noise abatement amenity. g. that development plans showing minimum floor elevations of the units be submitted to the Engineering Department for review prior to final plat approval. • JEJ:jmj • • • • • • • approved Planning Commission Minutes -6- March 13, 1978 C. Raven Ridge, Edenvale Inc., request for rezoning and platting of approximately 14 acres for 22 single family and 24 townhouses. The site is located on Outlot V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, east of Hipp's Cedar Point Townhouses. A continued public hearing. Mr. Peterson stated he has had further meetings with the surrounding residents and discussed adding open space to the project, and will he finalizing such • plans and suL...i.ting for staff review. Motion Redpath moved, Lynch seconded, to continue the public hearing to March 27, 1978 for a staff report. Motion carried unanimously. • '' / ((�� 3 May 2, 1978 RESOLUTION NO. 78-79 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS ON LOTUS VIEW DRIVE I.C. 51-321 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 21st day of March, 1978, fixed the 2nd day of May, 1978, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 517321, Street and utility improvements on Lotus View Drive. WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the re- • quired notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 2nd day of May, I978: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement as above indicated is hereby ordered (and amended as follows). 2. The City Engineer is he,eLiy designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement, with the assistance of Bather Ringrose Wolsfeld, Inc., Consulting Engineers. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • t • 1130 May 2, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-82 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS ON DELL ROAD I.C. 51-326 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted on the 4th day of April, 1978, fixed the 2nd day of May, 1978, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 51-326, Dell Road Improvements from the north end of Edengate to Duck Lake Trail WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the re- quired notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 2nd day of May, 1978; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement as above indicated is hereby ordered (and amended as follows). 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement, with the assistance of Bather Ringrose Wolsfeld, Inc. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie.on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL } John D. Trane, Clerk 7 MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 28, 1978 SUBJECT: Dell Road Improvements I.C. 51-326 Pursuant to the Rezoning Agreement dated April 6, 1978, for the Edengate project, it is proposed to construct as a public improvement that portion of Dell Road from the north line of the Edengate project to the connection with Duck Lake Road, as shown on the attached drawing. The work would include grading, drainage facilities, Stage One bituminous surfacing (30' wide) and a 5' concrete walkway. The estimated cost of the project is $274,000. Our recommendation to the City Council on April 4, 1978, was to also include in the public hearing notice the upgrading of Dell Road and Valley View Road through the Maple Leaf Acres development. The hearing notice has been so published. However, recent discussions with the developers of Maple Leaf Acres indicates that they are strongly opposed to construction by the City at this time of either Dell Road or Valley View Road through their development. They claim that the resulting assessments would be an economic hardship in that marketing of their lots would be made difficult with only the major roads in place through their development. They also plan to do the grading and storm sewer work along Dell Road and Valley View Road in conjunction with the paving of their development. In view of this we are now recommending that the scope of the project he limited to the Fdengate segment of Dell Road. The Maple Leaf Acres portion of Dell Road and Valley View Road not constructed by the developers can be included with some future project, such as the ex- tension of Valley View Road to Hidden Ponds. The developers have agreed to complete the connection of Dell Road to Duck Lake Trail as part of their construction program this summer. A preliminary assessment roll for this project is as follows: Parcel 2225, Section 6 (Edengate) $200,000 Parcel 4219, Section 6 (Edina Bldg., Inc.) 8,000 Donald Kral 66,000 City MSA Fund $274,000 It is recommended that the proposed improvement on Dell Road under I.C. 51-326 is feasible and that the City Council adopt Resolution - No. 78-82 ordering the improvements and also adopt Resolution No. i'i J _ - 2 - initiating the acquisition of that portion of the needed right-of-way from Duck Lake Trail to the south line of the Edengate project (Purga- tory Creek). • If the Council desires to proceed at this time with the complete project including the Maple Leaf Acres portion, the total estimated project cost would be $584,000. The assessment against the Maple Leaf Acres develop- ment would be $139,000 ($23 per abutting foot). CJJ:kh ..... . . ...,. • . '' I C,.,51-1,2(,, . 1..pr.t... i.‘ ' '''':.-... •-'\\':, .' ; . .. . . . :.•.:..s; .. . . . , ....... ..• ..-) D , I , /. Ity).1CCT 1.4)..i1T I, 5 fk.1 y %\ \‘‘ •, ,:',".)(''','\`'.'. ..;\ '-'--(.. S\ j . , . ....., ....., .-- ..,..\,‘. • \ „\% ce7 .>/ ///::...:,;(::„ 2-::.:s',..'---.—•.:.---._:.-..7.77...' "' !",•, _.:. ..,..: -:'';-:',.,'.•- -.---1-`--:`, N...,.....----",..- 4i• ,,....„-.. - 1 i '-\, \ . -, , • ; ! ....„ •,:. . I,.• .. . . . , 1 \::,......\ \,....., " l?• , __ _). •„-.• . 1 •-1 •• ,74-".."',' ' ,'''r'r \ • ' ,, :-I'' • 11,':"'' - -'-•' \k• \ i .. . . • . .. -------\ '.. .•, • -. ,, . - \i, ../N, ..... .. ; '1':,, ,,. 'i.,,,.,' -;.-..,..: __..._:- — \ •,,,' \‘'..•\,e' . .— ., :'''.;:.:•'-''',..1...',-;.•t:*.,::: 7- AN •'',....-..-../". ;''' -1 /,..,. ' ,, •:...`, ,. • • 1 _-- / ----s-s. :, ..„. •''.'•y, : i': :. ,,"-.- .. .)-';';' '''-.:r•;---.7.--,,-,..1:";:;',.. ---1 I-- ,.. 1t'is:_-...'::.',...1-...",—:::fl',,,'"..:, ' ./- i ,• 1;,____________ ....._ f i . . i I . 1 -_. ._ ,i ' ..... ......,_ j i ••:' 'l• , •..:„\., .....:.t.::: ,,: 7 .1 / ' ''' ••• .1 ., _ .. , •... ,,-;,'-,....',.-L .1•••' _ _ --•...." •':. !. - ...,.• . ...„,„-i •s..s. ...!..i-: __ .--- - .•• ---- __ • .t ,.•. ..f :. .. .. , _.____ •''..:,••••,'....,...1: !\.'...,„,--7-7-7 .y •,,. \-., ..::..- ... 1., ... —.: -• i ••, • , N 1 i -- - ....._•-:-.:..• ' ••- • L.'.,9 -- - ----- ".,. • , • -. '.1 .., '..21-'- 1 r *-: - -- ;' )----1 ,____J I j. 11 . ,..•::...-. .:,:•:,• ••-•-• ,,-• •1-1-:-.• ..., .,, ,--,..- :. ._ -0- ' • • ' \\:I tk)) .... L. - !NU rlt/jh 4/ 7/78 CI'I1' OF EDIIN PRAIRIE IIENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNI STI'A RESOLUTION NO. 78-89 IVHIjREAS, A Rezoning Agreement has been entered into by and between the Eden Prairie Townhouse Company and the City of Eden Prairie involving Edengate Townhouse Development; and ' WIffREAS, the only access to be provided to the Edengate Townhouse development from [kick Lake Trail is the Dell Road Construction; and h1ILREAS, Eden Prairie Townhouse Company has agreed to dedicate to the City of Eden Prairie the right-of-way necessary for the construction of Dell Road through that part of Section 6, 'Township 1.16 North, Range 22 West owned by Eden Prairie Townhouse Company; and WHEREAS, It will he necessary to acquire or condemn the right-of-way to connect Dell Road from the south boundary line of the properties to he dedicated by Eden Prairie Townhouse Company to the north line of Duck Lake Trail, NOW, 1111 tFEORE, BE 1'T RESOLVE.`) that the City Attorney of the City of Eden Prairie proceed inmiedi.ately with the necessary action pursuant to Chapter 117, Minnesota Statutes through power of eminent domain to condemn the necessary right-of-way for the completion of Dell Road as hereinabove set forth and further that the City Attorney, the City Manager and the staff of the City of Eden Prairie he authorized to take the necessary steps in compliance with the provisions of Section 117.042 to secure title and possession of said right-of- way at the earliest possible date. f', MOPPED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 2nd day of May, 1978. Wolfgang II. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John h. Franc, City C1crk • II • ff 2 l i�j rlt/jh 4/26/78 Itryant. I..View Estates CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE IIENNEPIN COUN Y, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 78-19 AN ORDINANCE REI.AT ING TO ZONING AND f tIiNDING ORDINANCE NO. 135. 111E Ci'1'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 13S is amended by adding to Section 3, Township 116, Range 22 as follows: The South 500 feet, measured along the East line, of • that part of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 3, Township 116, Range 22 WEST, lying Easterly on US I-494; subject to limitations of access to said highway, and Tract A, RLS" 1000, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, and That part of Government Lot 4 of Section 2, 'Township lio, Range 22 West, lying westerly of Itryants Long Lake and lying Southerly of the • South line of RLS s 1000 and the Masterly extension thereof, and That part of the South 1/2 of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 3, 'township 116, Range 22, lying Easterly of the Easterly Right-of-Way line of 11S 1-494 as set forth in final certificate document :#907830, which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone and shall be included hereafter in the R1-22 District. Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Rezoning Agreement dated , 1978 entered into between and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:, a municipal corporation, which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all of the ordinances, Rules and regulat ions of the City relating to such R1-22 Districts. Section 3. 'Phis ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this day of , 1978 and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1978. • 'Wolfgang Peu:el, Mayor t1TtEST: • John 1). Franc, City Z:lcrk • Published in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1978. • t -2- Bryant I .View Estates • 4-17-Y8 • • REZONING AGREEMENT • • TiHIS AGREEiMENT made and entered into in triplicate this ___day of , 1978 by and between hereinafter referred to as "Owner" and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner has requested City to change zoning for a 23.4 acre site from Rural to R1-22 District for development of land more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof and which is identified • • • as Exhibit A, and • WHEREAS, Owner agrees to develop the aforementioned property in consideration • • of the C ity's c};o,gang of the zoning , and G.,er further agrees as a part • of said consideration it will lay out, develop and maintain such project as hereinafter set forth. RN THEREFORE, this agreement witnesseth that for and inconsideration of tee • Mayor and City Council of theCity. adopting Ordinance N 78-19 changing the • • zoning from Rural to R1-22, the Oweer agrees to construction on said property • in accordance with the planning, architectural, engineering and landscaping • requir rents of all CiC✓ Ordinances and will submit dcvelop:netit stage rezoning • • plans to the City subect to the following conditions: 1. Erosion control he irEa chanted prior to are properly maintained • during construction to prevent sedimentation entering Bryant Lake, according to Nine (•tile Water,hed District rece.:mendations. 2. Noise abatement plans be submitted to and approved by the staff • prior to final approval. Earth berms, grade separations and • vegetation should be incorporated in such plans. • • 3. A trail he constructed along the east/west roadway in the right- • of-way from Peach Hoed to the eart properti: line. This trail will convert to four, ;rails in I;—ant take Park. Trail should be 5 (five) feet wide end constructed of 5 (live) inch concrete. y 'In H Rezoning Agreement - Bryant Lake View Estates page 2 4. The streets should be planned and constructed so that no more than TA slopes are used. 5. Any homes constructed on organic soils shall have proper footings, excavation and granular backfill. Drain tiling shall be incorporated around footings were required by the City Building Inspector. 6. Preliminary plat approval for 26 lots on 23.4 acres with cash park fee of $275/unit be paid at time of building permit. 7. That the Owner sign the eastern end of the through street to denote it as a temporary deadend. • 8. That the City Engineer's reports be complied with and that all • sanitary sewer , watermain and storm sewer facilities, concrete curb, and gutter and bituminious surfacing,whether to be public or private, shall be designed to city standards by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer and submitted to the City Engineer • for approval. The developer, through his engineer , shall provide • for competent daily inspection of all street and utility construe • - tion both public and private. Asbuilt drawings with service and • telie ties on reproducable mviar and certification of corepletion • and compliance with specifications shall also be delivered to the City Engineer. The developer also agrees to pay all fees • for City Engineering and administrative services consistent • with current City requirements. • 9. That water mains and lines be installed and plugged in order to • allow connection to public water lines when they become available. • 10. That Owner agrees to develop said property in conformance with the preliminary plat dated Jan. 16, 1978, reviewed and approved by the City, and attached hereto as Exhibit B. And Owner • agrees to promptly file this Agreement with the Register of Deeds • and supply the City Clerk with a copy of this Agreement with • • information as to Document No. and date and time of filing duly certified thereon within 60 days from the date of said • Agreement. • 11. That if Owner fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement within 24 months from the date hereof , or file said Agreement • and provide proof of filing in accordance with paragraph #10 • herein, Owner for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees that it will not oppose a rezoning of property back to Rural. 12. That the property Owner shall comply with all applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, and laws of the City of Eden Prairie. • • 13. That the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors and assigns, of the property herein described. 4 i /21 j i Rezoning Agreement-Bryant Lake View Estates page 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed the day and year aforesaid. • CITY OF EVEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota BY: _ ___ fga Wolng H. Fenzel, Its Mayor BY: _ - Rorlcr K. Ulaad, Its}leneger BY .J',�...`4/,A-1-,._•.. ��i Ala BY:Yr �Y..lxlsft�� t�tt.7O x'''� Its — -- — -- ' STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. HENNEPIN COUNTY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this,-2/ aycf ' 4-'�-• . n/8 Wolfgang nzel the Mayor and byRoger Ulstud, the City t•tanifgcr of ],iS by kol t ,al � Pc Y 9 the City of Eden Prairie a Minnesota municipal corporation en Prehalf of the corporation, - • ✓N- x.w..i.4kAAAA!.4a �4.WLAMS.VI1iAl...41X No ry Public 1 LYNNAE CAROL NYE. .r (,, :':' L(�i:::'r rL'C•i tc•pIIt.7;6if L1 l �1,. IIINN!F'IN. COtltllY r ,.,., I rrr.s A',.3o,e0sl XYYYYtrvvvvyvvvvvvv vrtYI)TYYYwVYYA 2.) Rezoning Agreement-Bryant Lake View Estates • page 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) S5. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _ 1978 by the and by the of on behalf of said Owner. i Notary Public qq, 1 i i i 1 i I BRYANT LAKE VIEW ESTATES LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South 500 feet, measured along the East line , of that part of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 3, Township 116, Range 22 WEST, lying Easterly on US I-494; subject to limitations of • access to said highway , and Tract A, RLS# 1000, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Henneoin,and That part of Government Lot 4 of Section 2, Township 116, Range 22 West, lying westerly of Bryants Long Lake and lying Southerly of the South line of RLS # 1000 and the Easterly extension thereof, and That part of the South '-5 of the SouthP?St quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 3, Township 116, Range 22, lying Easterly of the. Easterly Right- of--Way line of US 1-494 as set forth in final certificate document 007830. • • . EXHIBIT A • • 'IL'' .. I PREZ/i/at/4/?Y PL ilT i91-: i . I- f f ti BRYANT LAKE VIEW E.:STA TE S 1\1 :7/-1 41 • , II. I! `.. i'\. •..: !.f.' , • , • .1 ' i':....' ... ', . ‘...,\''. I 'I I' / amen: THELMA C. NA YAIES 1 -. Ir.!' .,.. ,',..1•:::::. ' % I :!! . ... . ..1....I . , • . .• i , i,,,z \.. ;, / ., ,: • , '' ...1•.! ',:, ,.„ -,;"-,--..,,: -,' 't ' : .‘• • .. -.-:' -',";,...'0".'. \, , •. - 1, -'---' - ---;,-.;;::,L,' -.--""•-l'A-1'-.----:-"'"-r;''ri--",,,"'''''.•iP•-.2..-72---'-- - \ •-•,..,\ ,...i ,.....-7.,T . .1 ,s ., .• i,s,.., \--0....:....s-;,....;: •.;:::-:- „„ •,‘ '\,‘ -9. .\; I'l :i (. • .:•%;;;\ \.,"(''''',.-f-:-;•"‘‘ • ,.. A' 1 .• --------r.. `..,\,-,' 't , ... ''.' ',.!-,-A '. .//,CA' ' . ''.,\\ ,..::-.1,i7...''..j 1.t.2'.1.1JI ' 2 '''•-.7'. (1--.Vi ..- ^.- . , ,',\\' .- .,_;'' \, 4 ,' il..,•,.. i 1'' .• 4...//'/ '' ' } ./.•s-•:ri / ' ••••• \ ‘‘.\\... T.\' '-\. ./' ‘i‘1.;•,..-- e-:-7 '/I , '..• ,‘ ‘\.', '' '`;,)- \.I./. ,....';'•1.- .'`•-• ,. "1/ : • • \ N• v . :,7.:;;''' •r .;,,,. ,.,\.\1-•‘. .. .-7—•••:::::S.'\.:,;\,....----1.--: \ '\`' '' s'‘.\ 1.\.,..‘,. :.•,- . t..\",......*\::;...\\ ' , .,14'..:.;)":±:,•••,..... ....„.-:\\:\...,•\. .. ' \., • •1 \ \ ; •' , .,\:(•.\ .,----a .._.!,;., : _......s.' , .... • ..•i...., ----- . s .. . . ..'"' -'.,,...2-;,.\'',.i .‘" A!;• - • • . . .c.... \ • . , • .. ' ,"`N.-- : . \-• ' \`'• ..,s';',....1`, ..\ ' '. t-.,., '- ...-: -,` '1'''' - • .. '' k:. ; \.. '', \\' ; ....... •i, .• , ..7.-:•.::'...::-..-.:.......:.:•;::.:"..:•:.....;•::::•; . ---.<.- •- --—' - i ,'i I :-.......::-..7.'....:'.-..7::7.::,..:::''''-`-"- . '‘.\\:* • / 1.;•: ... -. , \.. N.S.•••-...•:.,... ..., _. •••i:I)if/. • I i..--7::::-:.''''.::,::::•:::.:7:::i.,...:',..:':',.•:3--'::- \\ \ , 'ill :::::::::•:•:-.".......-.:-.7.•:•:-••:.'•.r.:.:,7.::: .; • . . • . . 71.71.ii R41.1.:f J 4::ft, • _1 5 . . 1-1,-,-,iir,.c,s .... ....__........ ... .......... _... .........._ , . ___........_. lil rif 1 • Prc..porly - rlt/jh 4/26/78 Mn. Mini-Storage 2nd CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NI). 78-21 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND MENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135. 171E CITY COUNCII, OP THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to Section 1, Township 116, Range 22 as follows: All that part of the West quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 22, lying northeasterly of Flying Cloud Drive and lying Southeasterly of new US 169. Beginning at a point on the East line of the West quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 1, said point being a distance of 153.85 feet northerly of the northwesterly ROW line of Flying Cloud Drive as measured along said East line of the West quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section I; thence northwesterly to a point or. the ^nthcasterly ROW line of new US 169 said point being a distance of 645.81 feet northeasterly and northerly of the south line of the Northwest quarter of said Section l as measured along said southeasterly ROW line of new US 169 as per Lis Pendens Docunent 11 3781721, which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone and shall be included hereafter in the 1-2 Park zone. Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the terms t and conditions of that certain Rezoning Agreement. dated , 1978 entered into between MINNESOTA MINI-STORAGE, a Minnesota corporation and the CITY OP EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal. corporation, which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City relating to such I-2 Park zones. Section 3. This ordinance becomes effective fran and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this day of , 1978 and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the _ day of , 1978. Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor A11'ES'1': John P. Franc, City Clerk Published in the Eden Prairie News on the_ day of , 1978. i i i I f 2 Mn. • • • Mini-Storage 2nd 4/18/78 • REZONING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into in triplicate this day of • _ __, 1978 by and between M1NNESOTA MINI-STORAGE, hereinafter referred • • to as "Owner", and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation , herein- after referred to as "City", • . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner has requested City to change zoning for a 3.06 acre site from Rural to 1-2 Park for development of land more fully described in • Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, and • WHEREAS, Owner agrees to develop the aterementioued property in cor-i • deretion of the City's changing of the zoning , and Owner further agrees as • • a part of said consideration it will lay out, develop and maintain such project as hereinafter set forth. NOW Tilt this Agreement witnesseth that for and in consideration of the Mayer and City Council of the City adopting Ordinance N 78-21 changing • the zoning from Rural to I-2 Park the Owner agrees to construction onsaid property in accordance with the planning, architectural, engineering and landscaping requirements of all City Ordinances and will submit development stage rezening plans to the City subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Owner agrees to install a screening along US 169/212 border consisting of earth berming and evergreen and deciduous tree plantings to be approved by the City Planning Staff. And prior to issuance of the building permit, Owner aurees to submit • for approval screening of garage doors and loading areas in accordance with Ordinance # 178. 2. That the Owner submit a storm sewer plan to the City Engineer and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for approval prior to issuance of • • building permit. 3. That. erosion control be implemented , in the form of hay bales, during construction to prevent excessive soil loss and in • conformance with Nine Mile Watershed District regulations. _ y Rezoning Agreement-Minnesota Mini-Storage 2nd Page 2 • • 4. That the Owner pay cash in lieu of land as per Ordinance ,• 332 prior to issuance of building permit. 5. That signage be limited to the existing signs for the • present Mini-Storage facility. • • • 6. That the property Owner shall comply with all applicable • rules, regulations, ordinances, and laws of the City of Eden Prairie. 7. That Owner agrees to develop said property in conformance with the plat dated Jan. 3, 1978, reviewed and approved by the City, 'attached hereto as Exhibit B. And Owner agrees to promptly file this Agreement with the Register of Deeds • and supply the City Clerk with a copy of this Agreement with information as to Document No. and date and time of filing duly certified thereon within 60 days from the date of said Agreement.. , 8. (hat if Owner fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement and provide proof of filing in accordance with paragraph 7 herein, Owner for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees that it will not oppose a rezoning of property back to Rural. 9. That the provisions of this Agreement shall bebinding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors and assigns, of the property herein described. • 10. That the City Engineer's reports be complied with and that all sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities, concrete curb and gutter, and bituminious surfacing whether to be public or private, shall be designed to city standards by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer and submitted • to the City Engineer for approval. The Owner through his engineer, shall provide for competent daily inspection of all • street and utility construction both public and private. • Ashuiit drawings with service and valve ties on reproduceable myler and certificai.ion of completion and compliance with specifications shall also be delivered to the City Engineer. The Owner agrees also to pay all fees for City Engineer and administrative services consistent with current city requirements. • r<<1'r • Rezoning Agreement-Minn.Mini-Storage 2nd page 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed the day and year aforesaid. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota BY: Wolfgang H. Pcnzel, Its Mayor • BY: -- ! Roger K. Ulstad, Its Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. • COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) • The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1978 by Wolfgang Penzel , the Mayor and by Roger Ulstad , the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation and on behalf of the corporation . 'f. Notary Public MINNESOTA MINI-STORAGE, a minnesota corporation B.W�,4tubbard, Its Vice-President BY: • Its STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing/ instrument was acknowledged before me thik�'lj day of jO, 1978 by t� r.�,11go•.7/ r1)/f;4C i1 the -1b 1 _'z •ci and by ------- - -------------- the --^—_� —`- of Minnesota Mini-Storage on behalf of said Owner. 1141 Notary ['will is r a co::ar • • • MINNESOTA MINI-STORAGE 2nd ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of the West quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 22, lying . northeasterly of Flying Cloud Drive and lying Southeasterly of new US 169. Beginning at a point on the East line of the West quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 1, said point being a distance of 153.85 feet northerly of the northwesterly ROW line of Flying Cloud Drive as measured along said East line of the West quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 1; thence northwesterly to a point on the south- • easterly ROW line of new US I69 said point being a distance of 545.81 feet northeasterly and northerly of the south line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 1 as measured along said southeasterly ROW line of new US 169 as per Lis Perdens Doc:nsent 3781723. • EXHIBIT A • • / . • 1 i. I .i 1 7 'cy n ...4' ,i . 1../iit*/* :. / \ . ,e Z . i/ • 1, . / 4::........: 1 .. :a -\- krtn✓-crip‘ r Wit- .fra . ' , •' It tl . rlt/jh 4/2(i/78 Amsden Bills Third CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE IIEiNNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOtA ORDINANCE NO. 78-18 AN ORDINANCE. RELATING 'I'0 ZONING AND AMENDING ORDINANCE. NO. 135. 'DIE. CITY COUNCIL OF 'I'!Iii CM OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to Section Township 116, Range 22 as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 zone. Section 2. The above described property shall. be subject to the tens . and condition:: of that certain Rezoning Agreement dated , 1978 entered into between The Preserve, a co-partnership consisting of Carter t S' Gertz, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and The Minnesota Gas Company, a Delaware corporation and the City of Eden Prairie, which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all of the ordinances, rules t' and regulations of the City relating to such RI-13.5 zones. • Sec•tion 3. 'Phis ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this day of , 1978 and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1978. A'I"!'IiST: Wolfgang Penzel,TEayor -;l1ni 1%�r:+nc,tity Published in the Eden Prairie News on the _day of , 1978. AM S U I I I t l I I J I Fi i r U 4/17/78 REZOiJIING AGREEMENT • THIS AGREEMENT wade and entered into in triplicate this day of , 1978 by and between ihE PRLSERVE, a co-partnership consisting of Carter R Gertz, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and The Minnesota Gas Company, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", and the City of Edon Prairie , a municipal corporation , hereinafter referred to as "CITY". • WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner has requested City to change zoning for a 16 acre site from Rural to R1-13.5 for development of land more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, and M1Fo7Ac. Owner agrees to develop the aforementioned property in consideration of the City's changing of the zoning, and Owner further agrees as a part of said consideration it will lay out, develop and maintain such project as hereinafter set forth. NON 1HLREFORE, this Agreement witnesseth that for and in consideration of the Mayor and City Council adopting Ordinance # 78-16 changing the zoning from Rural to R1-13.5, the Owner agrees to construction on said property in 1 accordance with the planning, architectural, engineering and landscaping requirements of all City Ordinances and will submit development stage plans •1' to the City subject to the following conditions: 1. That Owner agrees to have the homeowner's a«ociation nkaintain the northern cul-de-sac fsa.ANo. % � f,-�, 2. That the Owner or his developer work with the City Forester to determine the extent and method of tree removal during overall site development and removal of diseased dutch elm Lrecs. 3. That Owner agrees to establish dense underbrush and ovcrstory vegetat.ion to define the deer corridor as approved ty the • Planning Pepertwcnt Landscape Architect. In Addition, owner agrees to install fencing, equal to 6 foot cyclone, along the western berde•r of the deer corridor in conjrn etion with the plantings, it densities in that area are greater than six units/ acre. ��,�� Rezoning Agreement- Amsden Hills Third page.2 • • 4. That Outlot B and the northern portion of Outlot 0 as • shown on the letter and plan dated 2-21-78 and attached • hereto as Exhibit 8, be dedicated to the City and that the southern portion of outlot 0 containing the stormwater • pond he retained and maintained by the Homeowner's Association with a drainage and utility easement. Such maintenance shall include : weed control, cleanup of trash • end debris, mosquito control, and odor control. Owner shall be responsible for removal and clean-up of silt and debris from the pond and storm sewer system accumulated during mass grading and construction of streets, buildings, and • utilities. 5. That. Owner agrees not to plat a road across the deer corridor .. to serve as access to Outlot C.. • 6. That the City grants the Owner the following variances from Ordinance 135 for Amsden Hills Third Plat: • • • -lot size variance from 13,500 square foot minimum for 9 lots -setback variances as folle:s' 5 foot setback to nearest garage wall without living • space over 10 foot setback to nearest main house wall l;Z story. • 15 foot setback to nearest main house wall 2 story. • 7. That the City Engineer's reports be complied with and that all sanitary se..;c•r, naatermain and storm sewer facilities, concrete • curb and gutter and hituminions surfacing,whet.hee to be public or private, shall be designed to city standards by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer and submitted to the City Engineer • for approval. The Owner, through his engineer, shall provide for competent daily inspection of all street and utility construction both public and private. Asbuilt drawings with service and valve ties on reproduceable mylar and certification of completion and compliance with specifications shall also he delivered to the • City Engineer. The Owner also agrees to pay all fees for City • Engineer and administrative services consistent with current City requirements. • • 8. That Owner agrees to develop said property in conformance with the • plat dated Feb. 27, 1978, reviewed and approved by th:Cit.y Council, attached hereto as Exhibit C. And Owner agrees to promptly file this Agreement with the Register of Deeds and supply the City • Clerk with a copy of this Agreement with infomnation as to Document Number and date and time of filing duly cotifled thereon within 60 days arum the date of said Agreement. • 9. That if Owner fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement within 24 months and provide proof of filing in accordance with paragraph 8 herein, Owner for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees that it will !-c• not oppir.Ai a rezoning of the properly back to Rural. Rezoning Agreement-Amsden Hills Third page 3 10. That the property owners shall comply with all applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, and laws of the City of Eden Prairie. 11. That the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors and assigns of the property herein described. • I f�6rjj{ Rezoning Agreement-Amsden Hills Third page 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed the day and year aforesaid. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota BY: Wolfgang H. Fenzel, Its Mayor BY: Roger K. Ulstad, Its Manager THE MINNESOTA GAS CO:TAtiY, aDelatiare corporation BY: is ? c II/s 1/ -,-,_. _l_ C'A¢ ie t L'.-Z/ti /cl.C. a i.'.cc5r1A u'' : zr A'PcAT,o,) i Its tat," it -,f.. „ JI` STATE OF MINNESOTA) • )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,, 1918 by Wolfgang Penzcl, the Mayor and by Roger Ulstad, the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municit;.11 corperatie e aid behalf of the corporation. • Notary Nubl ------------•-— — • STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. } COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __day of , 1. 19/8 by --- ------ -- — the _—�_--- ------_. and by :::w• the. - — of -- -___ sue::::* .::.es ------I _ "� REBECCAQUERRE.'.10ENn I+ialf of said ( of ! F MUTARY F'UGUC wN.�twta /�' - ( ,, —_-^1f.'- Ci. HENN. IN COUNTY. 1-/(- c c ` cc (,A..0-,Let„t- 1 Itt \!: Fly ommman Ewe.0ve.10,1^"0 l_.5[ l'_l .• �_ .•e a,'Y Uhl is • f't1.r•vtry 21r .1ie8 i'l:.r•,ing Cer.•,i,snion City of EJcn Prririo • )5O IJ.,n P.'t.i riss Road d,;i Pr..iria� 7t tL1 eta j5a 4 Rai h^:1 r.rt i .•.t 1 .d1ua f: Cb^:ctl^' .vns In response to the oone.:rna outlined in i to^ro 1-6 in the January 25, 1978 Staff Report num.r.ary The 1'.rr.a_vt ;,rcpo• the fo?lcuinvs 1• he Pr•sterve will not request ucc.•ra to Cut lot frc. ncror.e Outlot S. 2. Outlet G (the deer corridor) ,.1)1 i•.1 widened at tho •two ends per the attained ske t. . 6 5. Outlot B and Lo will uu a zero emi.cenance area r.nd allowed to "return to nature After construction is completed in the adjacent areas .,f A":.den III and Outlot tl, Outlot 8 will he reviewed to doter- . mine if supplemental unciert,t :si. and nverstory veget::tion is required. Cy-lone fencing shall not be required unless a high r!nn�ity multiple develop- mont on Outlot (4 is proposed h the developer. If such a proposal is bro.yl.ht For-e:.rd, its situ plan ehr.11 includo a boundary treatn:crrt between Outlets u and A consiating of the fencith• aloi.ea and plantings needed to limit the higher intrusion potential resulting from the higher density. !+• Outlot A is currently refiner negotiation for sale as a double bungalow site with r. lotting plan sin:- liar to that shown on the attached sketch. If the negotiations aro successful a proposal will he be- fore you shortly. No development negotiations are underway for Outlot tL at the pr.•:.ent time. Develop- ment potential is anticipated to he low density attached or detached roer.+entrr.l with a density up to 2 D.U./here. • • i t Cernr rjn•ne R910 1 week)Rd Eden i'r,,r r :faro 5(,.4.t3 .6121 941 ;1C1 • Amadan Hills III • Preliminary Plat February 21, 1978 Page Two 5. T1ho col-du-sac island will he ' •'^,'f '..ai'!tained by The Preserve Association. 6. The Preserve will work with thy' C i t> !u:el.t or to determine the patent and meth., at t;, e removal during ovorall site develop,,e1:t. 1 bolievo The Preserve and the City are un substantial ;(;roe- went and because of restrictive cou-,tiiictiun time deadlines I urge your prompt and favorable acceptance of the Ameden • Hills III subdivision. Respectfully submitted T1 E YIIESERVE % 6 Loe V. John n Vice President - Engineering LWJtoh Enclosure cc Chris Enger • Exti 1B1T B • • nn m't r L �i � .J L � `F2lT • PIAWN,G7 IRANSRU11A70,1,N;JM_CUN:i IA{K,00 LCfJ1E April 27, 1978 • • DESCRIPTION FOR RE-ZONING RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF AMSOEN HILLS THIRD ADDITION A tract of land located in Hennepin County, Minnesota described as- follows: That part of Government Lot 2 and the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 24, and the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 25, all in Townsnip 116, • Range 22, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Government Lot 2; thence North 00 degrees 53 minutes 55 seconds West, assumed basis for bearings, 1327.08 feet along the west line of said Government Lot to the north line of said Government Lot; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 10 seconds East, 165.58 feet along said north line to a point on a non-tangential curve, the center of circle of which lies North 56 degrees 54 minutes 45 seconds East, 666.20 feet from said point; thence southeasterly 646.04 feet along said curve, through a central angle of • 55 degrees 33 minutes 42 seconds; thence South 16 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds East, 33.00 feet; thence North 76 degrees 03 minutes 25 seconds East, 397.88 feet; thence South 04 degrees 08 minutes 03 seconds West, 87.91 feet; to the beginning of the land herein described; thence South 04 degrees 08 minutes • 03 seconds West, e6i.3/ feet; thence South /3 degrees r3 minutes 59 seconds East, 'le+.3 feet; thence Southo. degrees S7 minutes 03 seconds East, "/47, /. feet; thence South 16 degrees 44 minutes 72 seconds East, //2.4z feet; thence South 57 degrees 55 minutes 06 seconds East, Z5H.,“ feet; thence South 08 degrees • 32 minutes 22 seconds West, 'r4i,31.+ feet; thence South v+ degrees o7 minutes zi seconds East, 2 1..'4feet: thence South 87 degrees 58 minutes 17 seconds West, 'zpv.l¢ feet; thence North 57 degrees 49 minutes 41 seconds West, 254.72 feet; thence North 34 degrees 31 minutes 26 seconds West, 190.56 feet; thence North 11 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West, 130.82 feet; thence North 11 degrees • • • • • I!5 28 '?tt 76' TG.�. CNW171N,00710 SE.WOLSFELD..Nw1 soAR'NER.NL 710,7717N AIM SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS.MN 55135 RIODE 7107031.2300 • Page 2 03 minutes 59 seconds East, 323.01 feet; thence North 04 degrees 38 minutes 08 seconds West, 74.24 feet; thence North 68 degrees 19 minutes 04 seconds West, 178.64 feet; thence North 33 degrees 26 minutes 16 seconds West, 155.54 feet; thence North 24 degrees 58 minutes 59 seconds East, 150.00 feet; thence North 57 degrees 42 minutes 42 seconds West, 144.71 feet, to a point on a non-tangential curve, the center of circle of which lies North 01 degrees 01 minutes 13 seconds West, 766.20 feet from said point; thence easterly 202.59 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 15 degrees 08 minutes 58 seconds; thence North 73 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds East, 166.43 feet to the point of beginning. • I hereby certify that this description was prepared by me and that I am a duly RPaistered land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Thomas G. Arneson, II Minnesota Registration Number 21682 • • „ ••\) ,.\\ , . L.. -' • - .,---''' -••••-,z, • •44,\ . / - -. ts"*-- • .• • gz• 7. -\. .‘•\• . . 1 I. I I i i''"'""et:..„..4 • , , .. i 4.t‘t*4•11 ":'t .... -,‘ t 6,0 •,:"...,„, •, 1 , - t 4.,...„, . 0 4,1*,,,,, / __,.,,„-:-._.-- ,--t•-•.•', . •A % 0 -..-- .-",-, : . 1.5,..... .e. %, ,... ._-— ..• ,;.-2:..,;••••••' s i . I .1. • , .--..i•-•--. —. ' ' • *A-."--"'.., 45 , ...2. -,:61?'-''' ., . ,-...-"-..) • • { %%'s , ( ''ft. • g cr7,.. Z.,,e 4 it' 7 . 1 ', /7.,..te: ot \ 4 $)1/ C•41 I . .to. % I 1 . . • .,..i : .--.----,3 ‘,. 0.. . • • • e. .....- . -- i.,._,, --,- fr'''"--..._,•**/ •,,,, ' : * , ----.------*._ • e • ',90 .r • \ . i _44....„4____ /, .,.......x • 6 / •,...i. , , ,,. t.)ts .. -----g 1"._."'......,1' • .... , - s °- I ji \ -------- . ..'•-: .. -,, i...-1 i..,—....,...,;........-----i...a~,-.........- ,:, 1 111S ........4C' '' --'.., ] \ . , •A ' 4z.A.:. i \t•,I. \ , ... 11\. , .-`,.... . .f,i; \ • \ 1 . - ... t,r •, ' .\ ' •‘,.* • \-:° \•( ' .. • \ )+... \. • 1 ,c,to . 0 • , .- , • 4....1,') vsit, DJ'f " . • . . , A.:" .•\ /\ 17 , • -.. • ,, t • . . ., s , • - 1 ,‘ , t •• • ) I ,____,:1,2_:..,„,„, ____ •\ :.7 :,../, • NO:-.11VIAL 132(3.00 r.__ FLOC:43 03p.da : , ••1 -". "1 r-' ' ' Ti-I, .. • . . .,• . l t • '\s : ,,,, ........;.„- , ---------- i 1 -7,--4,77, , !I , ' • ,.. --'.-. _•-•••-- ' -4::-I• ».\---s.-. •• ' 1-"•••--- -r-, . . '74' I( • : \ , . .i ._ _ _ _... I: / I: • . - I . • -- ' . - --- . ...„1 ' 'i let,•• ..,:f er r 1 .„ .. I T•141; 1 .. . .. . . FOR ,• I'll . .. 1•$;i•t. 11Y1 LIMN WARN N . .' ----1 - TOTAL AM A 1,,I Ar',..!, _--.- r.mAttp,i tol T.AliC1 .I LOT ''••" . , ...., AVE 11A,t I Di ,,..'`...• . NUMFILI2 OFLO1S ,/. - .i . . . , i . . , - ... . . / . " . . • . \ . , . . . 1 •• ..... . , . `. ‘t 1.• ''‘,,,, .- ,.. . / ‘.. '\- . . i I 0,.•.,1e, ; ,z,, / , ,„ , . .,,,.' ..1 .. I ., ,,,'-'' • . . 7" ,4 te...1 , . / . 7 Li --- . , • Y • . /, • . i ' e ,• --.- , , •'• 1 I ,, \0 ' N. 74 • ... , ma_ • \ .--., i . . „ • , . • / '' / I? ,.. .,. . . ' ! \ t . 1 \ • i •.. . i , ,.' I i \ \• . '' \I \, \/V6 C'.. ''' ' 1 .. . . , , •- 1 I .\' -..'.• • . 0\ ..;.• '''s ' . ale ic 1 ' \ 0 ...•• . .• '° • . i\ • \.1 / \/ •,\ \ \ 1. \ ‘\ ,‘ \ \ . \ . .. •, '"' 1 '. :..\. • 0, ., 9 A n . 1 ' I 3 ' ' *•2 /** • \ T ' I • 1....-. i •, \ . 1 • : k ' 7 ' I / • , 4? , ; . i . 0 , ,• • ' i i :e t • . - .4. ' i . I . 1 l',.... 41,4t ."' , . •..,._ • , i i i. . , ,./ , ' 7 ./.* .•x •• '" .. ' . . . ' I • -"- (• . 1 - ' - , ,...• . •• 1`.4... . • .' 1 .- - - ..- ,. .'• Wt, . ,,, , , , '..„...,\.• . ,,,,. ., .--, II,... 'I/ . . I , '.. '.•. ,, ! ' I •' : , / , ' -'''.'I . 7.. ...• , -, ) , -..... 1 . . . i --.. . .. . . . i, • i• . UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION • C^.ar.mnn,•r thy A:... •,.., f.,-rI,\ .., William W.Sem,'Ion UNA I ,`1i. .us, of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA Ier, 300 EAST 42nd STREET. NEW YORK, N.Y. 10017 , C,etsb fit\ ..� (212) 697-3232 co cna <ewn A- .-ruru. V3 Cable Address UNASAMER • J V.McDonnell w•IK �J Chairman.M._ilnnncfl DoadIa•.Core �7�` {{{�" ,r., ..;(', •�,.,.,.n ft., ,., r • /rN r .^"`U , n- .,,,,..,r , i.. ;.., .... i V,re Cr„•,...,, ArU,ur J GoINDcrq ,,,,i, .. ..,.„t n 1 Pal,lc�a K n,G,apio Henry Cabot ledge C.C'Gx,v,n,Jr. San irnnc,.cn Feud,UNA Anna Lord Straw°S C^niaman,Loon Coryolallal Jan E.Leslie Ilobort M.Ralnar Gnarins W.Yost Chairmen.Ltacn:G,.4,me t en Never Partner-1Ane,,N'eva•.A Rubin Jean Piclnr Inle,c"nn le inundation .• • Robedv.,W n man 6 CO. April 10, 1978 ram," n,a'nerr L51e<Linzer V P.Sonthe,n N Y.Sale Nv.UNA Harry W.Knight Chaair Han.Neet:Or0 A,,,Ibi'tte<,ton. • Robert F yv.�abl'... TO: THE MAYOR Partner--ANhur Andersen 6 Co. • 6o,,,mv., FROM: CLIFTON C. GARVIN JR. • • Morris B.Worn Partner•Pm,,west,Wrkind, Chairman of the Board, Exxon Corporation wt. n 6 Gagnon R.M Mannning Ilmwe,Jr National UN Day Chairman 1978 Charrm°n,N.Y.life 1o,ur::nce Co Pientd br, .C1Wet" RE: UNITED NATIONS DAY, OCTOBER 24, 1978 P;es,dnnl,Saurnvve5:rrn U�v:vnn,DNA Jacob Clayman P esrdent • Indust.,Union Denerenen1,Ai L.CIU WJham T.Coleman.Jr • rnrm„r..oAle,eenyAMyers In appointing me to serve as National UN Day Chairman for 1978, • GnyW1A lrentnan IiM.C^;,n, ;',n,Naunnul"'ask of CIne,ao President Carter has given me a most challenging assignment- • - • A.nntAar.a•••ne to expand public understanding of international issues that Chairman, Vr s,d��nrc.I,NA ter and affect us all as American citizens and to build support for the Dr.Armand Hammer chairman,o.r,nrnra,retinl<„r,,Corp United States commitment to the United Nations as an important Wader F..Ranson part of our foreign policy. President Carter's two dramatic c^ai,man Port.Ato v ,'. trips to the UN in 1977 underscored its importance as the major nrc Helmer A Co Rath IhmdelC forum for negotiation of global problems. Clarice m.,man • AUnrncy V l•,nicn,Ch:,,der,UNA PlilipIDaDnlck You can help me succeed in my task of creating greater public Awt:n,rkln.e;t,n.,n/s understanding of the UN's work by appointing a distinguished • Cdw:ud lamb r,,,<;,,.,,,.;o.mnLnnrnn:ns.lnc. citizen in your community to serve as UN Day Chairman. Last LF.Mocne„m year your yes once and that of other mayors across the country Gunmen r.,,er,/e_.,Aar,,,:nlun Texas Cow P Port,r,,,,,,,.e.:,;; helped make UN Day 1977 one of the most successful observances ASsecinF,Jo",N❑o,C,cr 7,1 to date. Over 1,000 communities in all SO states participated a,rmelc,.,,n,•„Ma„ Cr,n,n„a,,:,r•,,.N r ,•'rnhir in UN Day programs, most devoted to meaningful discussion of 5,. .,cn,n"ns,rnn Srr mi..S Pero-had US policies on international issues. This active spirit of c^'^"'" i"` `°""' `"""`'"Hark citizen involvement echoed the "working atmosphere" which • W',Iliam Radar i•,es,//m, P.eh:A r,.nn.Ire characterized the 32nd United Nat ions General Assembly as it nrh:,rd J Serene.. dealt with the largest agenda and number of resolutions ever. • J M S f t Lh ,,r l ,m:..a',s le I; This year, as in the past, UN Day provides a unique opportunity • u , "^ +"'°°^It Jr to appraise realistically the work of the UN system and our role Ammo„morn..on in it. I urge you to make an early appointment to insure that there will be adequate time for planning a program of some ream s.o..,cn•hn significance. Arthur R nay If you will return the enclosed card with the name of your JneRy,r.s"° designee as soon as possible, UNA-USA will work with him or her • to help in planning a comprehensive and effective UN Day • Lnes•I I•,rm,n;ntu observance in your community. • Rich,ad rII Wiener 1 <<^' r• !r NI:MJ!1ANI5 M TO: Mayor and City Council --_, 111BU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Jim Jensen, Park PlannerO DATE: April 28, 1978 SUBJECT: Rid Summary and Analysis of Park Construction Equipment Included with this report is the comparison chart of heavy equipment companies who bid on construction equipment for lease this year. This equipment would be used by our crews this year for grading at Preserve and Bryant Lake Parks. We plan to use three 11 cu. yd. self-loading scrapers, one 65 hs. small dozer and one 105 hp, medium dozer for a period of approximately 2 months this summer. Staff recommends taking a 2 month lease rate for purposes of awarding the bid to the lowest qualified bidder. Low bid would be: #1 11 yd. John Deere scrapers Valley Equipment $6,800/2 mo. if2 11 yd. John Deere scrapers Valley Equipment 6,800/2 mo. #3 11 yd. John Deere scrapers Valley Equipment 6,800/2 mo. Medium Dozer Cat Ziegler 6,200/2 no. Small Dozer Cat Ziegler 2,500/2 mo. Total 2 month lease $29,100.00 All leases can be extended as needed at monthly rates equivalent to above rates. Money for equipment rental will come from the Community Development Grant for development of Nesbitt Preserve Park, Edenvale Neighborhood Park, and from the Governor's Trial Program for trails in Bryant Lake Park. is BID SUMMARY: 2 Month Lease Rate Valley Equipment Ziegler Case International** Harvester 3-11 yd. scrapers each $6,800 $7,900 no bid $5,400 (1 only) Medium Do-.er 6,500 6,200 $6,400 no bid Small Dozer 2,800 2,500 3,100 no bid 1 "International Harvesters hid was not correctly submitted and had to be rejected for Ioga1 reasons. 94 l MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council fIIRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager )f' FROM: Sandy Wells, Recreation Supervi.t ii— DAli April 28 1978 SUBJECT: Park Users Fees and Additional (lours at Bryant Lake Park The Paris, (Recreation and National Resources Commission discussed the operations of Round, Riley and Bryant. Lake Parks at their last meeting and made the following recommendations for change. 1. Boat Rental - Currently we are charging an hourly rate of $1 per hour at Round Lake and $1.50 per hour at Bryant Lake for the rental of a sailboat, canoe and Towboats. A deposit has not been required. CO>hulSsInN I:PCO:I ENe,1'f10N: A $10 deposit for the sailboat and $S deposit for canoes and • rowboats be assessed in addition to the hourly rental rate. This deposit would be retained if damage occurcd to the watercraft while rented. 2. Non-Resident Season Pass - Parking at Riley and Bryant Lakes has been free to residents with season masses, which are sent to them in the mail. A daily rate of $1.So per car is assessed to non-residents per visit or they may purchase a season pas:; ,ur $6 per family. • CO'i?It OhJO\ lE.CO.`"ii.XItATIO\: To increase the non-resident season pass to $8. 3. Boat Launching - Fees for launching have been: $2. for boats of 20 hsp. or greater. $1.50 for boats 1-19 hsp. Free for non-motorized or electric motors. Boats over 20 hsp. are not permitted to launch on Sundays or Iloildays at. Bryant lake. co)",t i S S I(N II[tai`i';iAa',i'TO\: Boat launch fees remain the same on weekdays and the following changes made on weekends: $3 for boats 20 hsp. or greater. $2 for boats 1-19 hsp. In 1977 the Cotamission and City Council approved a boat launch season pass for residents and non--residents. The Commission is recommending the rates remaining the same for this season. (See attached memo for rates) Last season 3 passes were sold - two $30 and one $15. 4. Additional Hours at Bryant Park - Bryant Lake Park is scheduled to open Saturday, May o_and he open daily through September 4th. The hours arc: Weekdays 1-9 p.:n.; Weekends and holidays ( a.m. to 9 p.m. Personnel has been budgeted to be on duty during these hours. BECoM\TNPA1I0V: The Commission is requesting the Council consider opening Bryant Lake at 9 a.m. on weekdays after school closes (.June 12) through Labor Day. It i would cost an additional $1,032 in salaries to schedule a Park Attendant on duty these additional hours. The Park Attendants arc required to have current Advanced Life Saving or Water Safely Instructor Certification, be out of High School at least two years and have at least one :season of life guarding experience. We have set these requirements since the primary activities at Bryant and Riley Lake Parks, where Park Attendants arc hired, arc water sports. Attached is a copy of the unapproved minutes of the April 17, 1978 meeting, and my original memo on Peach Operations. SW:md • is • 1611 MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Sandy Nerts, Recreation Stpe or DATE: April 14, 1978 SUBJECT: Beach Operations - Riley, Round and Bryant Lake Parks ROUND I.AEF BEACH Season: June 10-August 13 Hours: Noon to dusk daily Fees: None Boating: $1 per hour canoe rental No motorized boats allowed, except for electric motors. Staff: 3 Life Guards 1 Beach and Concession ;..Jc ROUND LAKE BEACH PERSONNEL - Three guards will be scheduled each day. - Two guards will be on duty from Noon - dusk - Third guard on duty from 1-6 P.M. - In case of "poor weather" one guard will he sent home - An extra guard will be called in whenever necessary - Beach will close completely at 6 P.M. during poor weather - One aide scheduled daily but will be sent home if "poor" weather develops CROUP RESA MFTONS Groups may reserve the park building for a picnic or planned activity. The pavilion is not reserved so that an area is left open for family type picnics. Non-residents rust pay a $100 non-returnable fee. Residea:; pay a $10 deposit returnable it the site is left in order. Staff is currently studying our j' 1-.:serration system and the problems involved and will be making recommendations for po:;sible chAnges. r -3- LAKE RILEY PARK Season: Weekends: May 6-7, 13-14, 20-21 hail)': May 27 - September 4 (lours: 1-9 P.M. Weekdays 6 A.M. - 9 P.M. Weekends and holidays Fees: $1.50 per car non-resident parking fee Free: Residents with pass $6.00 non-resident pass Boating: $2.00 - boats 20 hsp. or more $1.50 - boats 1-19 hsp, Fee - non-motorized or electric motors Group Reservations: Reservations accepted with $25 deposit for all groups. People pay regular entry fees. Deposit is returned if no undue maintenance costs result. Boat launch extra. Staff: 1 Part; Attendant • 1 Park Aide (2 on weekends) 1 Life Guard (weekends only) Personnnel: - A Park Attendant will be on duty during all operating hours - A Park Aide will be scheduled each day Monday-Friday, 1-9 P.M. and Saturdays and Sundays 11 A.M. - 7 P.M.; 1-9 P.M. - Park will close at 7 P.M. if "poor" weather develops - A Life Guard will be on duty from Noon to S P.M. weekends and holidays Rile Lake Owning Last. season we opened Riley the beginning of May and had an attendant on duty. The :mount of revenue generated and the number of users per day was much lower than Pryant Luke. In fact weekend use accounted for fifty percent of the revenue and use. This year the staff is recommending that an attendant he on duty weekends only until Memorial Pay. The amount of revenue we would loose not having an attendant on dirty is insignificant to the cost of the attendant. goat launch Season Passes The ('ommi:::ion and Council approved a head launch season pass for the 1977 season. 'three passes were :old; all to Eden Prairie residents. pees approved by the Cemrtission are: Residents Non-Residents 20 horsepower or greater / 1-14 horsepower 1114 $15 $25 -2- BRYANt I.Alai PARK Season Daily:beginning Saturday, May Gth thru Monday, September 4th Weekends:in September thru mid-October - weather permitting !lours: 1-9 P.M. Weekdays G A.M.-9 P.M. Weekends/Ilolidays Fees: $1.50 car non-resident parking fee Free: to residents with pass $G.00 Non-resident pass floating: $2.00 launch fee - boats 20 hsp. or more $1.50 launch fee - boats 1-19 hsp. Free - Non-motorized or electic motors. Boat Rental: $1.50 canoe rental rowboat rental Powerboat leg: Sunday and Holidays designated as a non-power day by the City Council. Any boat of 20 hsp. or greater may not be 1a:..;cned on these days. Groups: Reservations accepted with $25 deposit for all groups. People pay regular parking fees if non-residents. Deposit is returned if no undue maintenance costs result. Boat launch and boat rentals arc extra. • Staff: 1 Park Attendant 1 Park Aide (2-3 weekends and holidays) Y 1 Life Guard - weekends only ; Personnel: - A Park Attendant will be on duty during a]I operating hours. - A Park Aide will be scheduled each day Monday-Friday, 1-9 P.M. and Saturday f. and Sunday 11 A.M. - 7 P.M.; 1-9 P.M. - Park will close at 7 P.M. if "poor" weather develops. - Aide will be sent home if poor weather develops f; - A life Guard will be on duty from 11 A.M.-7 P.M. weekends and holidays II(.� Lmuter - Parhs, Itec. Unapproved eno I,Satural Itonources Coldnulon - 5 - Monday, April 17, 1970 2. !k-Isere .31.:,11,- (conttd) AVCr004 s!ohe to the llity Tolley of rceuced mice for core than one child in a faLily enrollin;-; in a proprarl. Anderson asked ohethcr any of these proprans acre run :,oint]y with nity i;d1';e..-Aia, and f(lt it was n ;pod opi'ortunity to ,.!or'n to- r,(ther. 'Arts satd they oay pet help on the boa nitration. 3. To, rlire sfohe to tho pro7rnn and air to eight speaialized pro,,EraLs gcarc d to the ol(T.:r teen . 4. Tern rcnt,r bierta responded to questions on the supervision problem, e;:plainin,, that cii offieer does atop in. It was agreed that tight supervision was needed. 5. Lirs.; 1,!ortf.; to ta:.; puor;ran as in the at, giving the teens fi.•;,;t U enpericncc. dIendC.c.o that they will be intervi‘aNhi,o.; for the 2ons Car the first ye,•” in.201 - ;:!:! r!I: 7 ::heri :are blifis sp:;he to of April 11th and responded to questions. The use of clectric notorn on titund loran questione,I, - a derasit of . 10 on the one of saiThantn and fer canoes was sn'j,:iested. • :;1::'.:C to re,-:ursts frae res:1C.cnts to be able to no into tic Farb. for fit": at 6:as: c . ;n il.at he feel;.; residents shou2d be able to one tic earl: Fore than is presently silowel, Pert.;; r(lt 1,;c: a'a,r1r1 be in 1:co.in, •.,•:ith the et'Icr rants in the arca cpen • at but ntaffin::, is not in 1.1:c bo.,1!:ct. Frs. Claudia F,car:-nr,,c,'935 hafley Nri(.11 13., pointed 01:1; tint last year Vaz early, nd r.ost, of tho yearn there could not be the aced to cr,.en early. I aleii oho to s"ro solic2.ule as for nrynnt Labe. rOTTC;:: no J .eved acec,:t the stun.rcirer.,ramr, as presented with thz.t, in P,:a.:!11 Cp(x.ttion5 of;de;unit of JO fur sailheats no , :• ,rylat ane !dlcy ll ..rb. be 3 k.N.,.; ;:en:1a,:: 3:or cue ; ree0;•;.onl tint V.( ; v'mh e;enlu" ,-,cynnt, Labe nt enriikr the than a- ition rated unnnioously. 110 MEMORANDUM • TO: Mayor and City Council • THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services l. • SUBJECT: Professional Services CSAH for Bikeway County Road 1 to Trunk Highway 5 DATE: April 28, 1978 Over the last two years City staff have completed plans for a bike trail along County Road 4. Each year the plans were completed but nothing else was accomplished due to the great amount of time needed to follow through with the project. • This year the City of Eden Prairie received a grant funding a bikeway project along Co. Road 4 in the amount of $58,500. This grant approved a stretch • from State Highway 5 to Co. Road 1. The $58,S00 grant indicates an estimate of 75% of the total cost of the project. The local unit of government is • responsible for 25% of the development and all of the acquisition costs. The $58,500 figure is not a final figure as MnDot expects the City to come up with final cost estimates and resubmit for a final cost of the project. We will have approximately $58,500 from thL. :cpartment of Transportation (possihily more), $59,100 from Community Development funds and approximately $5,000 that has been comaittcd by Ilcnnepin County. Therefore, the City has approximately $64,000 to use for the 2S% cost of construction, plus the acquisition of the right-of-way for the trail. Plans and specifications for a bike trail adjacent to Co. Road 4 were prepared by City staff last. year. Homeowners were contacted as was Hennepin County. The City plans arc fairly complete but will require some additions and alterations primarily involving alignment, dimensioning, and mathematizing the proposed • bikeway. • I have contacted our consulting engineers BRW and requested a proposal for professional services relative to the implementation of the CSAIi 4 bikeway • from Co. Road 1 to trunk Highway S. I have attached their proposal and costs estimates. These cost estimates would be figured into a final cost of the proicct and 7S% would be covered under the MnDot grant, the remaining coming from Hennepin County or Community Development funds. The City simply does not have the staff time available to complete the tasks necessary to implement the project this year. The staffs recommendation is to contract with BRW for a total cost not to exceed $12,000.for the work outlined in their proposal. BL:md 7 • r Ill ID\ AL.-1 iVV NG,1RAtYlY 1 R10:,1 N.:r.&t1:'' J 4JICIW[ • April 24, 1978 Mr. Bob Lambert Park and Recreation Director City of Eden Prairie 3950 Eden Prairie Road E 'en Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: Professional Services C.S.A.H. 4 Bikeway County Road 1 to Trunk Highway 5 Dear Fir. Lambert: This letter is to act as a proposal for professional services relative to the implementation of the C.S.A.H. 4 bikeway from County Road 1 to Trunk Highway 5. The bikeway is approximately 9,000 feet in length and substantial design work has been completed by the City staff prior to this time. The bikeway envisions an off-street facility paralleling the west side of County Road 4 or Eden Prairie Road. Financing of the project is a combination of State Bikeway Grant Funds, City, and County funds. One critical element of the implementation process at this time is the acquisition of the necessary right-of-way for the off-street system. Existing plans at this time require additions and completion of the design in a manner satisfactory to the Mn/DOT State Aid office. As referenced above, the acquisition of this right-of-w.ay will he the determining factor in the ability to implement this project in a timely manner. The remaining part of this proposal includes a description of the following items: . Work Tasks associated with the completion of the project . Cost Estimates for the professional services required to implement the project . Time Schedule based upon available information at this time w il4r.FW7iti.L WaS,11 .y17.Ci t.N0•AR.11G 701 WRY(AVM(<.AQU7/1 MV (APO,0 M71 15135 Rl7r[6043'7300 Mr. Bob Lambert April 24, 1978 Page 2 The Work Tasks involved in the completion of the C.S.A.H. 4 bikeway include the following: 1.0 Desiyn Completion Using the design available from City staff, additions and alterations to the plan would be made, primarily involving alignment dimensioning and mathematizing the proposed bikeway. In addition, the specifications and special provisions, together with bid proposal quantities, would be prepared followed by an estimate and submittal for approval by both ' City, County, and State agencies. 2.0_ Right-Of-Way Plan • A plan based upon the finalized design would be prepared for purposes of describing the necessary right-of-way to be acquired in accordance with the practices of the State Aid office. 'r. 3.0 Right-Of-Way Acquisition A program of acquiring the necessary right-of-way, including the necessary negotiations and meetings with individual property owners, would be undertaken using every attempt to acquire through negotiation all necessary right-of-way. It is anticipated that the possibility must be considered of the City exercising its eminent domain powers for those portions of the necessary right-of-way which are unable to be negotiated. 4.0 Apj roval and Bidding Assist the City in obtaining all necessary approvals, permits, and in advertising for and awarding a construction contract for the approved bikeway design. 5.0 Inspection and Staking Provide professional services for the construction inspection and staking of the approved design. Mr. Bob Lambert April 24, 1978 Page 2 The Work Tasks involved in the completion of the C.S.A.H. 4 bikeway include the following: 1.0 Design Conpletion Using the design available from City staff, additions and alterations to the plan would be made, primarily involving alignment dimensioning and mathematizing the proposed bikeway. In addition, the specifications and special provisions, together with bid proposal quantities, would be prepared followed by an estimate and submittal for approval by both City, County, and State agencies. 2.0 Right-Of-Way Plan A plan based upon the finalized design would be prepared for purposes of describing the necessary right-of-way to be acquired in accordance with the practices of the State Aid office. 3.0 Right-Of-Way AcOLsition A program of acquiring the necessary right-of-way, including the necessary negotiations and meetings with individual property owners, would be undertaken using every attempt to acquire through negotiation all necessary right-of-way. It is anticipated that the possibility must be considered of the City exercising its eminent domain powers for those portions of the necessary right-of-way which are unable to be negotiated. 4.0 Approval and Bidding Assist the City in obtaining all necessary approvals, permits, and in advertising for and awarding a construction contract for the approved bikeway design. 5.0 _Inspection_and_ Staking Provide professional services for the construction inspection and staking of the approved design. Ire . Mr. Bob Lambert April 24, 1978 Page 3 Cost Estimates for the professional services outlined in the above referenced work tasks are as follows: Professional Technical Work Tasks Man-Hours Man-Hours • 1.0 Design Completion 24 40 2.0 Right-Of-Way Plan 60 40 3.0 Right-Of-Way Acquisition 100 10 4.0 Approval and Bidding 8 0 5.0 Inspection and Staking 24 220 Based upon the estimated man-hours above, the total cost by work tasks are as follows: 1.0 Design Completion $ 1,600 2.0 Right-Of-Way Plan $ 2,400 3.0 Right-Of-'.day Acquisition $ 2,500 4.0 Approval and Bidding $ 100 5.0 Inspection and Staking $ 4,800 Therefore it is estimated at this time that the total professional fees involved should not exceed $12,000 for all work including the right-of-way acquisition, construction inspection and staking as well as design completion. The Time Schedule associated with this work is highly dependent upon the right- of-way acquisition process. Therefore the following schedule is assumed at this time. Authorization to Proceed with the Project 5/ 2/78 Design Completion 6/ 1/78 Right-Off-Way Plan and Approval 6/15/78 Bidding and Award 9/ 1/78 Right-Of-lday Acquisition 9/15/78 Construction 11/ 1/78 • 1113 13 Mr. Bob Lambert April 24, 1978 • Page 4 Upon your review. please contact me with any questions. comments or recommenda- tions you may have. We would be pleased to consider this proposal as a contract upon authorization from the City to proceed. The terms of compensation for engineering services would be at a multiplier times labor based upon the hours actually used for the work. This is in accordance with standard provisions proposed for our engineering services agreement with the City at this time. Sincerely BATHER RINGROS !WOLS ELD-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC. Lawrence/ 1 rdner P./ • LJG:nb 1I • 1 ►►iq . May 2, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.78-86 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF Garrison Forest 3rd Add. BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Garrison Forest 3rd Add. , dated April 42_1978 _, • a copy of which is attached hereto and amended as follows: is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein approved. ADOPTEO by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: Seal John D. Frane,Clerk May 2, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-87 RESOLUTION SETTING HEARING DATE FOR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 2, GARRISON FOREST 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. A petition has been received and a public hearing shall be held on the 6th day of June, 1978, at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Hall to consider the vacation of the 10' drainage and utility easement between Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Garrison Forest 2nd Addition. 2. The Clerk shall give proper legal notice of such hearing as required • by law. (Two weeks published and posted notice). Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • I (.4 1 MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Memebers of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 28, 1978 SUBJECT: Re-plat of Cots 6, 7 and 8, Block 2 Garrison Forest 2nd Addition If the Council desires to consider approval of this request, a public hearing will not be necessary because all property within 500 feet of • the lots involved is in the ownership of The Preserve and the City (Anderson Lakes Park). �. Passing Resolution No. 78-86 would approve the preliminary plat of , Garrison Forest 3rd Addition and Resolution No. 78-87 would set a separate hearing date of June 6, 1978, for vacating the 10' easement between Lots 7 and 8. CJJ:kh li')7 ,[ ,r Ly y � f k A) L_ L_1 R AN ev5,1 RA:.`..,,OR YA1 CN.L NG,ILL N•43,AHJn I FC7 LPZ April 20, 1978 Mr. Carl Jullie City Engineer City of Eden Prairie B950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: Lots 6, 7, and 8, Block 2 Garrison Forest Second Addition Hennepin County, Minnesota Dear Carl: This letter comes to you as requested in our conversation at your office this morning. From our discussion it was deemed appropriate to outline in letter form the problem we have on these three lots and the solution to said problem. The problem we have is that from an oversight on the part of BRW personnel, the lot configuration in Garrison Forest Second Addition was moved northerly from our original intentions resulting in sewer, water and storm sewer utilities being placed across Lot 8, Block 2, of Garrison Forest Second Addition. Upon becoming aware of the problem situation existing, I had the above mentioned utilities precisely located in the field relative to the monumentation of the plat. Subsequently we have prepared a drawing of the vicinity to graphically show where the utilities are relative to platted lot lines and have discussed the alternatives to remedy the situation. Lary Gardner of Gather-Ringrose-Wolsfeld-Jarvis-Gardner, Inc., Lee Johnson of The Preserve, and Hans Hagen of Bancon have met to discuss the situation and try to agree on a method of resolution. It is my understanding that it is the responsibility of Basher-Ringrose-Wolsfeld-Jarvis-Gardner, Inc. to work out the details and take title to Lot 8 and market the lot as can best be accomplished. (WW1 IpXH747.WCX14 LLD..$?MS.CA11[Y&R NC 70 MIK AV(.NLE SOL/N LAME APOLG.AW 5505 1tiO,C 612431-7300 Mr. Carl Jullie April 20, 1978 Page 2 A part of the problem is that Bancon had a sale made to build a home for a party named Pooton on Lot 8, Block 2. Of course, with the utilities located as they are in Lot 8, building the Pooton house on said lot became impossible. However, from the meetings held, agreement has been reached to build the Pooton home on Lot 7 and parts of Lots 6 and 8. With that thought in mind we run into a situation where we have to vacate the dedicated easement for utilities which was established along the lot line between Lots 7 and 8. From our discussions with yourself and your staff it is felt that the easement could be vacated by hearing, of course, but possible because there are no utilities constructed within the easement. As discussed, I would like to list my understanding of the procedures that we could possibly follow to get what has to be done. 1. Resubdivide Lots 6, 7, and 8, Block 2, Garrison Forest Second Addition, as suggested by your staff. 2. Along with application to resubdivide, also make application to vacate the existing easement located adjacent to the lot line between Lots 7 and 8, Block 2. 3. In the resubdivision of Lots 6, 7, and 8, create a utility easement in Lot 8 to cever the existing utilities to a distance five feet south of and parallel with the existing sanitary sewer. 4. Request a building permit be granted on Lot 7 together with the north one foot of Lot 6 and the south ten feet of Lot 8, Block 2, Garrison Forest Second Addition, to get the Pooton dwelling under construction as soon as possible. 5. Demonstrate to the City Staff and Council that the new lot, consisting of Lot 8 except the south ten feet thereof subject to the new utility easement to be created, is still a very good buildable lot. Enclosed herewith find the drawing that I have prepared indicating the utilities as-built, the proposed location of the proposed Pooton dwelling, and a possible house configuration on Lot 8 as it is platted today. After review of this letter and our drawings, please indicate to me the next step to take in this effort. As discussed, time is of the essence to settle this matter. Sincerely, BATHER-RINGROSE-WOLSFF_LD-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC. �7 / J cc: Lary Gardner Lee Johnson James E. Boerhave, F.L.S. Hans Hagen { 109 • „ l'- 5ourR b,NE Gorr zor 3 dam/ _ / �_ _______ —' — L--- „,,�'y L;.-”r -f ri /NE OF SE�ti mot/ oc jQ� N'f.1)s�t -- 5E';, 5 c. z� �17 p.73 5 rl 7''��7' `/ N��L'i;-.(. ' !r 44 np.' IG4,, N n � ,fir;. LOT n 1 �U .3'a8 V \\.'0 ,ti ` \ \ /S3S'.•- • --I, 'if/ r h h �� E''o �` s77'nS•••) :a`%• `�' 'i\.{49.6s 74°sg' • , , �'`t•\ • • \L , Z .\ \� S pD -" 6 \..f O.' �. . cs • ?`•.---- g4Sfl' ZFy.7 0 •o\ �o ?x�Y tga ' . \o t 96 m v• ,h 3��� :5cP q�Zb3! h�d.S- Gn vi\ ' \4 moo' t,,,f: 4.3.):% \''y' ;--‘ \0 3 N �� la / •,�''0 •4 9 °4 0 qk \ :A,\\d o\ \N I N:zt.'r+0/o:,,V° �b;o •` \ ti:� o\\0 2 �\ \�. •ri_O r C k. `i .rs�caQ o: ,•r°1:.J-_,r:���\ TG O T P ..La ` 0 b.ti V�v �s7Jt� 4 ,c, \ ..h w E y\ /3.0 .v.it' p�151'It�) ,°�` SFl•tro-l'Jt a°^�,: 0 6 4,\ itti''�'D ' J Ht 7 4 S 0\' .k T - l2°.°4 %\ �w 1� t Q \� o . .� \ 4 - .,1.. - 1� •,0-4''t • q/' ,: •\. 1 .. .•! .... I .. . , \ . i / . . , \ / ..‘.7" / / / 'i 1' ---,-,.:-- I , 1 / /7- ,.._..i.,.-,-„,-_ 7 - ---.. (<14:c,("1•14/At,_,; . T--c_-_---- il, ;.' i te . t _____,--- --i- - 0 --, --'--- &y;•'----.-.74----0- ---- ''.• . '' •'81 1 ;ft2•1` 5 ; 11,5--1-,-.-- . I-•:',A - •.4 ---- '1•4,,,04, ; -----...2. t : ______----a ----• t---;--— i-----•••••tt-0--- -1,- , . ,,,,,, 4--- • • .-- - +%•,-.4,,,,, y A• ., •ivre '51 .., ea, — ---- ........... „I er 1 N.- .....„...1, ---___) --il'oslible House Locel-/ I'. 0 — 0 r% „,,0 0 •,.1 ..4-------- 1 () ....1:-....••••••1 -",• ..-30— ON ..... . I, ..,:, - 5 00 4 /4 • \ : • ___,- • •-- ---1 —7; --776--,-, 1- -- , -...• ,.. . ...., i:.:. i //00,4? N., • ',--. • :-) ..f.5 5 . , 1 --: 0-•t 1 0 '..,.., 1 .....-- . ••r '0 : 16 6d r-°- I 1 •7.7., r - • . ... ., _,,..,„,,,,,....-,..„----.7 . ._--1 I • . ,, ,-- , • --.,...--1-. /3o , 0 . ..., , % 1 , , --- ' 3 ::: z .0 1 XI 3 ----- -'• I i • . I ,- / 5.00 - k • 1 ' 1 ••• ..• - 1 1 ...:• EL ____......-.., 17::_•._._ 3-4.4te 4,./ -... '-...,, . 0 13:"i='-1,11,A1 10 wy F-Ari op C-Aglz OP . ?_ET 3"' A-sN=. * C-0-1-5 C,, 7 4, 5 ,. / .i. V C T PV,-)01-1—i- FR a- Avb. • - i HI . I MEMO —" TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 27, 1978 SUBJECT: Right-of-Way Purchase for T.H. 169 Ramp CNR Golden Strip Property The legal counsel for Condon-Naegele Realty Co. has prepared the Quit Claim Deed for the right-of-way needed for construction of the westbound I-494 to T.H. 169 ramp. The land is legally described as Outlots D and E of the Golden Strip Addition. The total area is 5 acres. As agreed in the rezoning agreements for the CNR property, the purchase price for the land is the City Assessor's value of the property at the time of the rezoning agrement, which has been determined to be $15,000 per acre. In addition, there are special assessments against the acreage amounting to $10,590, which will be respread against the buildable parcels in the Golden Strip Plat. The total ..:_ommended purchase price is $85,590 and this appears on the May 2, 197S, claims list. CJJ:kh Attachment 11-0 SS� . .T1ji5 31arliturt, .„„..,,.i , 19th a „,. April in 78 lar,,,,,,, Condo -Naegle Realty, a Minnesota general partnership,comprised ., of Robert O. Naegele, Richard F. Condon, Robert O. Nae.jele, Jr. and ., William O. !largely . , „r,,,.(.„,„,,,,„/ Hennepin ,. ,/,‘,,,r. , Minnesota,/, . , ,,,, y 4 ,,,,„,p„,,.,, ,/ The City of Lieu Prarrie . • • Hennepin Minnesota ,. of Ira In ;,.f .441 Nhot,of . .. pa,t Yf II,.!I/1'0/4111,0,1. ilailmfM[111. TIfr it,',lot 11,1,/Y ,,T tt,..lirsi th 1itt irf ,..,1,4,1cr., .tr 4,1 It,....., ,,f . One Dollar .ma Other good and valuable consuFeration it to in hand pal.'I,y Hee said part Y Ill,. e.,crowl prt.thr r-,cript or herrof b.hereby orA140141,.,re,q.,,,,es St re-by t:ralet,liatriaia,Q nil doll,aod C.o.ey 14 if Ito I be,aid part Y of the A,4.4.4111 pari, it' Igrio,0,1,1 assier15,Fore.,r,all II,. tract or par.I of la,,,I lyinf trod i f brir,eir,II.Caa at y of liennePin awl Mat,of Alia'11,14(0,dr veribed e‘s foilmvx,to.lrit: Outlot D and Outlot E, Golden Strip, according to the plat thereof .. on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin . . _ County, Minne:-.ota, for road construction purposes. • . , .,. . '. . . . .:.-. . , ... . .. 11. ... ,; . '...:,:' . . .. , . . . . . . . . , To Itiolic nub In limit lilt Online.7,,,,lb.,orit I, ill thr 1,,,litantertts.and uplarrtrrtonrot therea at,1,..1.,or,i,t wr,..iaaya exe a ppert.ttreivil,to(1.•Kai,'part Y WM..•ecorsrl prat, its ',CIA IFOti..04.4II.f,F,,rell.I. lin TrotIm0111,IHIltrod.TItc..,,id part y of rho./Int part hoe s l,reaato 1 qi 4,•?!,.ii II r.t at,.,writ', 't,r.`,... 1.1.,,/,.....'••l,,:.•:+ , CONDON-NI\',ELF. RGALTY, -Zi Minnesor a ner ge partnership ,••• . - • •t:•,;1•,,......‘'''N'',7".'•••••t•.'L.Y.I b.:2.tr% .,, .....„, ••- 701 aibecri`0. Hacnr,le, a 1,4.17‘, . . • . ..,Z.: ../....-Oir../:••••••/ .i ' i,'"Y ii,,.. 9,=,,-,,, ,,,-,,,,„,„ ()4, ....,-/Ii, .IGJi• I. ' • ,f:H,fr. y,l•f••,, a partner .. ..•.tA,V,'F.---- linTram-0.•17.ieg:el V'a partner lil q , _. ..__ . .. • L.; ,111,1 I. iil 1PM Itac!1,,t i4ri i;1 a pl,:t liceof; tile city Council believes that the rezonini o'- Property to c .td4ional Service and Public will be in Cie public interest owl consistent with the welf:are and convenience of Cis people of the City; and USER;;16, at its regular ;quieting of February 3, 1976, the City Council passed a :notion adopting Resolution No. 10UG granting PUP Concept: approval for the Property, giving a first reading to Ordinance Po. 317 approving the rezoning of the Property to C Regional Service, and directing the City Attorney to draft a rezoning agree:lent, Nix!, TH=FOT:, This ilgreerient witnesseth, that for and in consideration of tl:e City Council adopting an Ordinance changing thn' of the Property fro;i lialt,st-'71 to C Regional Service and 79;elic, end of the Llittual benefits to each of the parties hereto, the parties, their respective succc:Isors and assigns, do herelw covennnt ai;d agree as follows.: 1. Owner:: agree to Ourolop the Property in accordance with the revised pluu dated ,Untie 2,1, 1976 and attached hereto as sub.titted ;:o the City sobjssii. to the following conditions: A. Tiani ii Unless dpdlication for a anildina per:li :A.)17 (7,)11.-::: r,flM,1 iei a site within Cie f,roperty An :idle within teo ysdrs iron the date eb. bite final adoption of tdd n1:dinanes rei:oning the Property, the City Council iLly review its action of rezoning the ercopsrLy to dcteraius iinether tat: concept and d,!volop;iluntal plans of the Ownors are still con- nistiat tilti ths dcvslophsit plans of Cie City. ln tas event taut the:, are not, the Property will .rel.din Las C ;tilai;onal Scri.,ites but: Lis cill it ' required to sua,ait new POD coaeept and developia_ntal plans.. -2- Ott