The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 04/18/1978 JOiN fR1NF EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL 1.r►et" 1UESDAY, APRIL 18, 1976 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Ross Thorfinnsor.; Planner Chris Enger; Finance Directcr John Frane; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo, Recoriing Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. CONSENT CALENDAR (One motion to approve all items on the Consent Calendar) • A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-20, rezoning of a 22 foot strip Page B00 west of I-5 District from Rural to I-5 Park for Richard Anderson B. Final plat approval for Basswoods 4th Townhouse Addition Page 801 tResolution No. 78-71) C. Final_plat a_ p oval for Nestlebrook Addition (Resolution . Page 603 No. 78-721 — 0. Final plat approval for Maple Leaf 6th Addition (Resolution Page 604 No. 76-73) E. R.L.S. apprq"al for Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Highpoint 3rd Page 807 Addition F. Clerk's License List Page 809 G. Payment of Claims Nos. 9282 - 9409 Page B10 H. Reguest_to set a Public Hearing for May 16, 1978 for Bachman- Page 613 Anderson tenter by_Bachman Anderson, Inc., for rezoning from Rurall^to Office for approximately 12 acres located north of Anderson Lakes and South of I-494 III.• MINUTES A. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 212. Page 815 I976 B. Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, March 30.Page 624 1978 'rt C. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 4, Page 825 1978 • • 1. • Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,April 18, 1978 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Pheasant Oaks, Burmith., Inc., re_q_uest for preliminary plat Page 621 & approval and rezoning from Rural to Rl-13.5 for 96 single family 847 detached hones on 55 acres. Located east of Red Rock Lake and South of Village Woods.—(Resolution No. 78-57, approving preliminary plat, and Ordinance No. 78-17, rezoning to R1-13.5) Continued Public Hearing B. Utility_and Street Improvements_LNorseman Industrial Park 2nd Page 848 Addition and Vicinity, I. C. 51-319 (Resolution No. 78-3-0-) C. Prairie East 4th, 5th and 6th Additions, request by Hustad Page 849 Development for PUD approval, rezoning of approximately 70 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5, preliminary plat approval for approximated 200 units of single family and quadraminiums. • 'roperty located in NE and NW quadrants of Co. Rd. 1/Franlo Road. (Resolution No. 78-54, approving PUD concept approval of single family and quads, Ordinance No. 78-22, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 and R1-13.5, .and Resolution No. 78-65, approving preliminary plat of Prairie East 4th, 5th and 6th Additions) D. Prairie East 7th, 8th and 9th Additions, request by Hustad Page 882 Development for rezoning approximately 50 acres from Rural to RM 6.5 and preliminaryolat approval of approximately 200 units. Additions located west of Co. Rd. 18 on Linden Drive. (Ordinance No. 78-23, approving rezoning from Rural to RN 6.5, and Resolution No. 78-66, approving preliminary plat of 7th, 8th and 9th Additions) E. Rezoning of an approximate 1.5 acre site from Rural to Public Page 911 The site is located east of future Hennepin County Library and north of Schooner Blvd. (Ordinance No. 78-16, rezoning said property from Rural to Public) V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS VI. ORDINAICES & RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 78-76,•granting preliminary approval for ,Municipal Page 912 Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of S1,000,000'1 for Super Valu B. Resolution No. 78_69,nranting preliminary approval for Municipal Page 918 Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of b3L200,000 for C.P.T. C. Resolution No. 78-50,granting preliminary approval_ for Municipal Page 923 Industrial DevelopmentBonds in the amount of-1,100,000 for Barrett Moving & Storage D. Resolution No. 78-22, establishing_a_p_olicy for the Cash Park Page 927 E. Resolution No. 78-75, accepting deed,bv the_Cjty_of Eden Prairie Page 929 from lndep ndent S• ool District No. 272 for Round Lake Park F. Resolution No 78-77,:'authorizing the sale of certain property, Page 930 Lot 17, Audi to _S1ulrsiivision-335, i{enn in County_ — 7 Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,Aprit tts, Mil VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS ' A. Reports of Council Members 1. Appointment of one member to the South Hennepin Human Services Council to fill an unexpired term to 1/31/79 B. Report of City Attorney C. Report of City Manager D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Tennis Courts at Flying Cloud Airport Page 932 2. Joint Use Agreement on Tennis Courts with School District Page 935 3. Arbor Month Celebration Page 944 E. Report of Finance Director 1 1. Final figures and costs incurred for bond refunding Page 948 VIII. NEW BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT. • • • 's, rlt/jh 4/13/78 Richard W. Anderson CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 78-20 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to Section , Township 116, Range 22 as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof; which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural and shall be included hereafter in the I-5 Park zone. Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Rezoning Agreement dated March 21, 1978 entered into between RICHARD W. ANDERSON ^r.a the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City relating to such I-5 Park zone. Section 3. This Ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden 'I Prairie on the day of , 1978 and finally read and adopted, and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1978. 1. Wolfgang Fenzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk b 1 Published in the Eden Prairie News on the _ day of , 1978. 'bn� ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager • FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE; April 3, 1978 SUBJECT: Basswoods Fourth Townhouse Addition PROPOSAL: The Developer, a co-partnership of Mark Z. Jones Assoc, Inc. and the Preserve, is requesting City Council approval of the Final Plat of Basswoods Fourth Townhouse Addition." This plat consists of 8 townhouse units and is a replat of Outlot B, Basswoods Second Townhouse Addition. HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved by the City Council on Feb- ruary 13, 1973, per Resolution No. 647. . Zoning to RM 6.5 was finally read and adopted on October 9, 1973, per Ordinance No. 208. The Final Plat now submitted for approval conforms to the approved Preliminary Plat. VARIANCES: A variance from City Ordin;..,:e No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1 will be necessary waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the ap- proval date of the Preliminary Plat and filing of the Final Plat. This variance request is reasonable because the owner is proceeding with the utility improvements and building construction in an orderly and efficient manner, as market demands warrant. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All utilities and streets within the plat will be privately owned and maintained. PARK DEDICATION: There will be no land dedication for park purposes within this plat. '.'Basswoods Fourth Townhouse Addition" is within the Preserve P.U.D. and the required park or open space dedication will be accomp- lished in other areas of the P.U.D. BONDING: Since all streets and utilities will be privately owned and main- tained, no bonding will be required. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Final Plat of "Basswoods Fourth • Townhouse Addition" subject of the requirements of this report and the receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the amount of $240. . A copy of the Conditions, Covenants, Restrictions and Easements must be filed with this plat in the office of the Register of Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles. q,, 4)7 April 18, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, M:NNESOTA RESOLUtION NO. 78-72 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT • OF NESTLEBROOK WHEREAS, the plat of Nestlebrook has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat Approval Request for Nestlebrook is approved upon com- pliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated April 12, 1978. B. That the City Clerk is h,::•eby directed to file a certified copy • of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds and/or • Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 452.358. Subd. 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute • the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • . I r�.+3 April 18, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-73 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF MAPLE LEAF ACRES 6TH ADDITION WHEREAS, th plat of Maple Leaf Acres 6th Addition has been submitted in the manner required for land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 452 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: • A. Plat approval request for Maple Leaf Acres 6th Addition is ap- proved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engin- eer's Report on this plat dated April 12, 1978. B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1 waiving the six mcv"41 maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said Engineer's Report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resilution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Coun- cil upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on Iolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk 'i I H CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 12, 1978 SUBJECT: Maple Leaf Acres 6th Addition PROPOSAL: The developer, Jarip Corporation, is requesting Final Plat Approval of "Maple Leaf Acres 6th Addition." This is a 17 lot single family residential plat (R1-13.5) located south and west of Duck Lake Trail and north of Maple Leaf Acres 5th Addition. This is a replat of Outlot A, Maple Leaf Acres. HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved on September 6, 1977, per Council Resolution #77-97. Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on November 11, 1977, per ordinance #77-28. The Final Plat now submitted for approval conforms with the approved Preliminary Plat. VARIANCES: A variance from the minimum lot size requirement of Ordinance #135 will be necessary. This variance was previously approved in the Rezoning Agreement dated November 11, 1977. A variance from Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will also be necessary. The developer has proceeded with this project in an orderly and efficient manner and approval of this variance is recommended. UTILITIES ANO STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer and watermain, storm sewer, biatuminous streets, concrete curb and gutter, walkways, street signs and street lighting will be installed in accordance with City specifi- cations. An additional utility easement will be necessary along the rear lot lines of Lots 9 through 13 for the construction of the sanitary sewer. PARK DEDICATION: A cash contriubtion of $275 per lot in the conformance with the building requirements of Ordinance #332 will be payable upon issu- ance of building permits as specified in the Rezoning Agreement dated November 11, 1977. • ovJ . - 2 - BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit approved by the City ! Attorney in an amount approved by the City Engineer must be proveded to cover the cost of installing sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, bituminous roadways, concrete curb and gutter, street signs and the pro-rata share for construction of Dell Road and Valley View Road. This pro-rata amount if $16,422•which is based upon $23 per abutting foot. A cash deposit of $202.80 will be required to cover the cost of instal- Cation and first year maintenance for street lighting. 1 RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Maple Leaf Acres 5th Addition, y subject to the requirements of this report as follows: I. 1. Satisfaction of all bonding requirements 2. Cash deposit of $202.80 for street lighting 3. Cash park fee ($275 per lot) due at building 1. permit time. • 4. Receipt of fee for City Engineering Services in the amount of $510. CJJ:kh ; i j • • • • MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer . DATE: April 12, 1978 SUBJECT: RLS of Lots 4 and 5, Block 1 Highpoint 3rd Addition The attached Registered Land Survey covering Lots 4 and 5 of Block 1, Highpoint 3rd Addition, has been submitted for City Council approval by Mr. Phil Hirsch, whose company is constructing double unit houses on these two lots. The purpose of the RLS is to divide each lot along the common party wall and thus allow the sale of individual units. Also, the division will facilitate mortgaging the units at time of sale. The lots are properly zoned (RM-6.5) for double units. Recommend approval of the Registered Land Survey for Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Highpoint 3rd Addition. . CJJ:kh Attachment i I E I,.. '607 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST April 18, 1978 CONTRACTOR (Multi-family & Comm.) Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. Earl Weikle & Sons CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) Dolphin Homes, Inc. Fladager Construction Johnson/Norby L. V. Construction, Inc. Kevin Moynihan Constuction Tessness Construction West Suburban Builders Wildwood Construction, Inc. . HEATING & VENTILATING H. Conrad Manufacturing, Co. D. J.'s Heating & Air Conditioning Southside Plumbing & Heating Co. PLUMBING Earl W. Day & Sons, Inc. FOOD ESTABLISHMENT - Type 8 Roberts Drug TEMPORARY BEER PERMIT Eden Prairie Lions Club • These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for the licensed activity. Rebecca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk April 18, 1978 STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 03-31-78 9282 QUALITY WINE CO. Wine 446.74 9283 TWIN CITY WINE Wine 629.82 9284 ED PHILLIPS & SONS Liquor 320.25 9285 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. Liquor 412.25 9286 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING Wine 356.00 9287 JOHNSON WINE CO. Wine 441.65 9238 MICHAEL NEUOECKER Mileage-City Hall 5.13 04-03-78 9289 STATE OF MINNESOTA Taxes withheld in March 10,067.43 9290 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employees withheld and employer ASSOC. contribution 3-31 payroll 6,055.57 9291 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 3-31 payroll 27.12 9292 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 3-31 payroll 7,085.17 : 9293 HENNEPIN COUNTY 433.00 9294 OLD PEORIA CO. Liquor 665.16 9295 QUALITY WINE CO. Wine 330.55 , 9296 STATE OF MINNESOTA Auto title and license afees 3.25 9297 STATE OF MINNESOTA 9298 STATE OF MINNESOTA " " 3.25 9299 STATE OF MINNESOTA " ° " 1.25 9300 STATE OF MINNESOTA " " 3.25 9301 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage for utility bills 68.85 9302 PETTY CASH Reimbursement of fund 45.33 9303 MASATO IKEGAIII Rental of Gym Equipment-Park & Rec. 75.00 9304 INSTY-PRINTS Service-Public Safety dept. 28.05 9305 ED PHILLIPS Liquor 613.96 9306 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING Wine 753.43 9307 JOHNSON WINE Liquor 525.15 9308 MIDWEST WINE Wine 855.37 9309 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. Liquor 690.10 9310 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage for meter 1,000.00 9311 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1st quarter report-F.I.C.A. 26,881.40 D4-18-78 9312 MINNESOTA PERSPECTIVES CONFERENCE Workshop for 8ob Lambert 27.00 9213 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK Bond payment charges 25D.73 9214 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLANNING OFFICIALS Dues for Chris Enger 30.00 9315 A&H WELDING Equipment parts 11.10 9316 PJIERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC. Decals-Water dept. 26.94 9317 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO., INC. Equipment parts 53.49 9318 I1ARYBETH BUCKIIAN Refund on dance class 16.00 9319 BARTON CONTRACTING CO. Sand-Public Works dept. 52.49 9320 BLOOMINGTON CHRYSLER Service on Public Safety car 39.95 9321 BEACON PROOUCTS CO. Field lining compound-Park Maint. 360.00 9322 BRYAN AGREGATES Rock-Street Maint. and Water dept. 955.32 9323 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE Book-Water dept. 32.22 9324 BLUE CROSS Insurance 756.14 9325 BACHMANS Flowers for Awards Banquet 17.00 9326 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS Equipment parts 229.75 9327 DONNOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Service on Public Safety car 12.00 9328 DORSEY, MARQUART, WINDHORST 2,566.42 WEST & HALLADAY �1U Service-Issue of bonds April 18, 1978 04-18-78 9329 EMMER DISTRIBUTION CENTER Lumber-Preserve Park warming house 1,299.84 9330 CHRIS ENGER March expenses 106.90 9331 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION Services-City Hall 22.50 9332 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN. OF MINNESOTA Dues for two firemen 10.00 9333 F.Y.S. FRAMING, INC. Frames for awards to Jim Clark 40.55 9334 STUART FOX March expenses 38.25 9335 FEED-RITE CONTROLS Chemicals-Water dept. 1,661.80 9336 BARBARA GUETHLING Refund on classes 15.00 9337 JUDITH GOODENOUGH Refund on dance class 12.00 9338 REBECCA GEIMER Refund on skill development 36.50 9339 HENNEPIN COUNTY Dues for Keith Wall 15.00 9340 HENNEPIN COUNTY Percentage of rent collected in lieu of taxes 5,979.00 9341 DIANNE HANSON Expenses-City Hall 14.40 9342 HENNEPIN COUNTY Supplies-Public "orks dept. and rental of chiparvestor for tree disease 3,127.51 9343 HENNEPIN COUNTY VOCATIONAL SCHOOL Service on Public Safety car 19.00 9344 JACK HACKING Reimbursement for supplies purchased 15.97 9345 HAGEN OFFICE EQUIPMENT Typewriter-Fire dept. 125.00 9346 CITY OF HOPKINS Gun range rent-Public Safety dept. 90.00 9347 HONEYWELL Service-Public Safety dept. 16.00 9348 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. or CHIEFS OF POLICE Dues for Jack Hacking 35.00 9349 GENE JACOBSON Training school dues-Fire dept. 289.78 9350 KAPAK, CORPORATION Supplies-Public Safety dept. 136.45 9351 KARULF HARDWARE Supplies 213.44 9352 KARULF HARDWARE Supplies-Fire dept. 6.64 9353 KRAEMER'S Supplies 227.39 9354 BOB LAMBERT March expenses 100.00 9355 L-Z CO., INC. Tool compartment for utility truck 500.00 9356 LEEF BROTHERS Service 166.40 9357 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL May 1 sewer service charge 13,456.19 9358 MEDCENTER HEALTH PLAN Insurance 1,048.09 9359 RICHARD MILLER Tree subsidy 800.00 9360 MODERN TIRE CO. Balance tires 21.86 9361 MAYVIEW RADIO Radio repairs 264.55 9362 3M BUSINESS PRODUCTS Freight charge on copy machine 25.00 9363 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. Gutter broom-City garage 96.26 9364 MINNESOTA FIRE, INC. Supplies-Fire dept. 82.27 9365 MEDICAL OXYGEN Oxygen-Fire dept. 58.59 9366 MYRON MFG. CORP. Notebooks-Public Safety dept. 68.95 9367 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 81acktop-Street Maint. 192.00 9368 MALKERSON Pickup truck 6,667.54 9369 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY Wire connectors for new squad cars 32.44 9370 NORTHERN STATES POWER Service 1,637.83 9371 OLSEN CHAIN AND CABLE CO. Service-Tree Disease dept. 8.00 9372 PENNY'S SUPER MARKET Supplies-Community Services dept. 16.94 9373 PRINTERS SERVICE, INC. Sharpened chipper blades-Tree Disease 10.24 9374 PETTY CASH Reimbursement of fund-Public Safety 12.40 9375 PRENTICE-HALL INC. Book-Water dept. 28.44 9376 PITNEY BOWES Postage meter 35.25 9377 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Insurance 4,054.35 'ii April 18, 1978 04-18-7B 9378 PEPSI-COLA Pop for machines 257.50 9379 SULLIVAN SEPTIC SERVICE Pump lift station-Water dept. 65.50 9380 ELIZABETH SIKES Refund on yoga class 10.00 9381 KARY SMITH Refund on tennis class 9.00 9382 STANDARD OIL Fuel for equipment 4,124.81 9383 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO. Calculator-Assessing dept. and Engineering dept. 201.90 9384 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES Portable restrooms 44.50 9385 W. GORDON SMITH Equipment fuel and parts 67.99 9386 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Dump truck-Park and Rec. dept. 7,098.78 9387 TALL TIMBER TREE CARE Service-Tree Disease dept. 360.00 9388 TRW Adding machine ribbons 12.77 + 9389 TOWN'S EDGE FORD Equipment service and parts 75.59 9390 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. Uniforms-Public Works dept. and Public Safety dept. 250.14 9391 VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment repair service 17.01 9392 UNITED FIRE FIGHTERS Dues for firemen 25.00 9393 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Workshop-Stuart Fox 4.00 9394 WORD PROCESSING CENTER Repair on tape recorder 63.18 9395 WARREN, GORHAM & LAMONT, INC. Personnel forms 18.25 9396 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE Insurance 334.45 9397 LORI WILDERMUTH Mileage-Community Services dept. 8.63 9398 WESTERN AREA FIRE TRAINING ASSN. 1978 share of Fire budget 1,240.82 9399 SANDY WERTS March expenses 35.72 9400 WALDOR PUMP Equipment repair-Sewer dept. 72.00 9401 WATER PRODUCTS Meters and repair parts-Water dept. 1,094.89 9402 BELLIS PAPER Supplies and stemware-Liquor store 117.73 9403 PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL ASSN. Rent-Liquor store 1,001.38 9404 SONIC ALARM CORP. Service-Liquor store 127.50 9405 PERBIX, HARVEY, SIMONS & THORFINNSON Legal service 6,732.20 9406 MINNEAPOLIS STAR Employment ad-Janitor 44.20 9407 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS Employment ad-Janitor 12.00 9408 FLYING CLOUD SANITARY LANDFILL Sludge removal-Water dept. 7,200.00 9409 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER Services-Well Pumphouse #3, ASSOCIATES, INC. Street & water Country Vista, Sewer & water Round Lake Area, Street Imp. Nygren Est., • Eden View 1, Norseman Park 2nd addition, 9,404.09 TOTAL 155,532.34 C i i APR3 3197$ (612)8534500 �l '.ACHMAN • t41 ) N D E R S O N dn�• BlOne Appleton,Square oom nDton,Minna 55420 INSURANCE • FINANCIAL PLANNING James E.Suthcrlin Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer April 12, 1978 Mayor Wolfgang Penzel and Members of the City Council City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 ATTN: Roger Ulstad City Manager Honorable Mayor and Council Members: We would like to request that in order to affect rezoning of our 12 acre parcel of land located at the S. W. Quadrant of I-494 and County Road 18 that you place the Bachman-Anderson Center project on the agenda at the Council Meting on May 16, 1978 for the purpose of a public hearing, as required by your statutes. We were attracted to this particular site because of its unusual and unique setting and we have spent many hours of planning and analyzing all data to make certain that we protect and preserve the natural beauty of this site. We feel that our proposal is one which will accomplish this objective and that our building will be an asset to the surrounding area. Our building has been planned to conform to the configuration of this particular site and to enhance it as much as possible. Our efforts to protect the environmental surroundings have been extensive and we feel that our development will be a definite asset to the immediate area and, thus, we would hope that you would find it possible to grant us our rezoning petition, as requested. Bachman-Anderson is a privately held company, specializing in sophisti- cated corporate insurance risk management programs, and presently employs 56 people. Our company was founded by Edward J. Bachman in 1944 and was located in downtown St. Paul until January of 1975 when we moved our offices to the Appletree Square building in Bloomington. • Attillnteillln American Ineutuncc Marketing Corporation Bon+ CnnkrYne.MA Penny,OA Nnnt.Hlle.AI. Landry.WY M.d.er.n.MI Ph..nl,,AZ It.,..NV a..Oie.WA Office.,in ('k.rlr+h„,,sr. Prn,ry,t'(f Indtnn,o.h.. IN 1 Inca'u.NII N.,h.Ple,TN Paulin/tn.1•A Itirhmund,VA T.sr..FL A,►urn,MF: (harlune.N(' Oe+M,.loe.,IA J.r\..,o.M:i Lhlle Itoh,AN Nr,,Orion..LA hotrod.lilt Norklnrd,IL F,n(I..uderd.M.YI. Kan,a.1'il r,MO I.o+Anrnr..('A N..Park.NY /•rinolon.NJ r...nm,CA W.d,lnrl.a,DC Ial(lm.re,MD (Tir.r•.II. IlryaurJ.1'T Km.of P,u,•ia,PA 1....1.,,i1..KY tihlh,m.(.Of.OK IY,riAnn,Ill Salt lak.COL,CT 111111nr+.MT C,dumi...0 1lu.O..,TX Kirk).nod,M), Milv..k,e.WI Penchi,IL K.ri1C10,KI, N. Francisco,CA WN..linr,WV -2- We are excited about building our new building in Eden Prairie and are hopeful that you will grant our rezoning petition from rural to office use, as requested. Sincerely, BACHMAN-ANDERSON, INC. James E. Sutherlin JES:jm } ?I� • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MARCH 21, I978 7:30 PM, CITY HALL CDUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, Dave Dsterholt and Sidney Pauly CDUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Ross Thorfinnson; Planner Chris Enger; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; City Engineer Carl Jul lie; Chief Building Inspector Wally Johnson; and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATIDN: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel PLEDGE DF ALLEGIANCE RDLL CALL: All members present. PRESENTATION BY THE AMERICAN RED CROSS OF CERTIFICATE DF MERIT AWARDS TD DFFICER JIM CLARK, EDEN PRAIRIE, AND LIEUTENANT WILLIAM BERNHJELM, EDINA, FOR SAVING THE LIFE OF WILLIAM METCALF Al Bergquist, Chairman of the Safety Programs for the American Red Cross, presented Certificate of Merit Awards to Officer Jim Clark of Eden Prairie,and Lieutenant William Bernhjplr., of Edina,for saving the life of William Metcalf. In addition Mr. Bergquist read a congratulatory letter from Congressman Bill Frenzel. Public Safety Director Hacking introduced Mr. Metcalf, the person who suffered the heart attack. Mr. Metcalf personally thanked each of the officers. Mayor Penzel announced that Officer Clark has also received the award of "Police Officer of the Year", which has previously been received by two other Eden Prairie police officers. PRESENTATION OF DISTINGUISHED SERVICE AWARDS TO OFFICERS JIM CLARK AND STEVE GEIGER FROM THE MINNEAPOLIS BUILDERS ASSOCIATION FOR SOLVING SEVERAL PARADE OF HDMES BURGLARIES Richard Feerick congratulated Jim Clark and Steve Geiger, Eden Prairie Public Safety Dfficers, for receiving Distinguished Service Awards, and introduced Douglas Hanson, Vice President of the Minneapolis Builders Association, who presented the Awards to Dfficers Clark and Geiger along with a check for $50.00. Dfficer Geiger thanked Mr. Hanson for the $50.00 check, and turned the check over to Chief Hacking to be used for the Crime Prevention Fund. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were requested to be added to the agenda under the "New Business" category: A. _Communication regarding power of local airport operators B. Bill regarding Chemical Waste Disposal Site r,�i) Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,March 21, 1978 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS (continued) C. Addition to the administrative staff in the Engineering area MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. CONSENT CALENDAR Osterholt requested that agenda items V. A., and VII. B, C & D be placed on the Consent Calendar, and that item II. B., be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion purposes. Council members agreed with this request. A. Clerk's License List B. Request from Hustad Development Corporation for a Public Hearing for Prairie East 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9th Additions (formerly item V. A. on Council agenda) • C. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-13, amending Ordinance No. 261, and regulating and requiring permits for signs and imposing a penalty (formerly item VII. B. on Council agenda) D. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-52, amending Ordinance No. 111, Community Based Services Board (formerly item VII. C. on Council agenda) E. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-51. amending Ordinance No. 77-2, changing name of the Human Rights Commission to the Human Rights and Services Commission (formerly item VII. C. on Council agenda) MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve all items on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. Payment of Claims Nos. 9006 - 9145 (formerly item II. B. on Council agenda) Council members questioned items listed on the Payment of Claims-list, and City Manager Ulstad answered same to the satisfaction of those concerned. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve Payment of Claims 9006 - 9145. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Bye, Meyers, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. III. PUBLIC HEARING A. Olympic Hills Liquor License Mike Adams, Attorney and President of Olympic Hills Golf Club, explained they are requesting the liquor license to be approved as it would be another amenity to enhance the golf club which is a positive influence on the community. • Meyers questioned if notices had been sent out. Ulstad replied notices were not sent out, but the hearing notice was published in the Eden Prairie Community News. `11t0 Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,March 21, 1978 A. Olympic Hills Liquor License (continued) Meyers further questioned if adjacent property owners were aware of the request. Mr. Adams responded he had spoke to about 90% of the adjacent property owners, and they do not view it as a problem. Osterholt questioned how allowing this liquor license would affect the City's allocation of liquor licenses. Mr. Ulstad responded this would be the 2nd liquor license, and the City has an allocation of six. Osterholt asked if there had been any change in ownership. Mr. Adams replied there were originally 10 principals, now there are eight. Osterholt questioned if the City has had any problems with Olympic Hills under the Bottle Club License. Lt. Wall answered in the negative. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to continue final action on the Olympic Hills Liquor License to the April 4, 1978 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Bye noted that the new Manager of the Olympic Hills Golf Club is Joe Duffy, who will be a real asset to the club. IV. MINUTES A. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 21, 1978 Pg. 2, 1st para., 3rd line, strike "lot" and insert "Block". Pg. 4, 6th para., 1st line, strike "Council" and insert "County", and in the 10th para., 4th line, strike "under" and insert "over". MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the minutes of the regular City Council meeting held Tuesday, February 21, 1978, as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. B. Minutes of the Special Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 2, 1978 Pg. 2, 4th para., 3rd line, strike "negative" and insert "in the affirmative". Pg. 3, 2nd para., strike "and projected it to Eden Prairie" in the 2nd line, and insert in lieu thereof "as projected to Eden Prairie"; 6th para., 1st line, strike "as a Council"; and in the 10th para., 2nd line, strike "as a designation for 4/5 intersection" and insert in lieu thereof "for illustration in the Guide Plan". MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes of the special Council meeting held Tuesday, March 2, 1978, as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. C.' Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 7, 1978 Pg. 2, add two paragraphs after para. 8 to read as follows: "Osterholt questioned if the original Homart site was planned for this purpose and/or other uses. Enger responded in the negative." Gt Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,March 21, 1978 • C. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 7, 1978 (continued) "Osterholt further questioned total price per acre. Smith responded $72,000 an acre." Pg. 5, 5th para., 1st line after "allow", insert "required lot". MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes of the regular City Council meeting held Tuesday, March 7, 1978, as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. V. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from Hustad Development Corporation for a Public Hearing for Prairie East 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9th Additions. (This item was moved • to the Consent Calendar - II. B.) B. Request from Eagle Enterprises for a temporary mobile sign City Manager Ulstad spoke to request from Eagle Enterprises for a temporary mobile sign three days prior to Easter Sunday at the Prairie Village Mall. Penzel questioned what kind of a precedent this would set. City Attorney Thorfinnson responded if this request is permitted it should be granted as an exception to the Sign Ordinance so it doesn't set a new precedent. City Manager Ulstad explained that if the amendment to the Sign Ordinance is adopted by the Council,it does provide the vehicle for requesting a variance. Therefore in the future a request of this type would have to be processed through the Board of Appeals & Adjustments. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the request from Eagle Enterprises for a temporary mobile sign at the Prairie Village Mall for 3 days prior to Easter Sunday, and that this request be granted as an exception to the Sign Ordinance so it doesn't set a new precedent. Osterholt, Bye, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", Meyers voted "nay". Motion carried. VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS No reports. VII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-12, amending Ordinance No. 152, and providing for the regulation and licensing of advertising signs City Attorney Thorfinnson answered questions of Council members as to • • the enforcement of Ordinance No. 78-12. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-12, amending Ordinance No. 152, and providing for the regulation and licensing of advertising signs. Motion carried unanimously. 7f Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,March 21, 1978 B. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-13, amending Ordinance No. 261, and regulating and requiring permits for signs and imposing a penalty (This item was moved to the Consent Calendar - II. C.) C. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-52, amending Ordinance No. 111, Community Based Services Board (This item was moved to the Consent Calendar - II. D.) D. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-51, amending Ordinance No. 77-2, changing name of the Human Rights Commission to the Human Rights and Services Commission (This item was moved to the Consent Calendar - II. E.) E. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-37, rezoning 38.2 acres for Edengate • by Gerald Pautz & Pautz-Franklin Realty from Rural to RM 6.5 for 176 units, and rezoning agreement City Manager Ulstad referred to the redrafted rezoning agreement and to the change to be made on page 6 of the rezoning agreement in the 3rd line, to read "1979" instead of "1978". Council members requested other changes in the rezoning agreement as follows: page 2, 3rd para., 1st line, strike varied; page 3, 2nd para., 1st line, after "40,000" insert "cubic"; page 4, 6th para., at the end of the paragraph add "for 1978", and on page 5, 3rd paragraph, last line after "unit" add "for 1978". All changes as indicated were approved by Council members. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-37, rezoning 38.2 acres for Edengate by Gerald Pautz & Pautz-Franklin Realty from Rural to RM 6.5 for 176 units. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the rezoning agreement with changes as indicated above. Motion carried unanimously. Howard Dahlgren, Oahlgren & Associates, thanked the Council for their time, patience, and approval of the project. F. Resolution No. 7B-22, establishing a policy for the Cash Park Fee General discussion took place among Council members, City staff, and William Bale, representing The Preserve, regarding the Cash Park Fee Policy. Ulstad explained that all documents have not been made available to the Council at this time but would be forthcoming. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to direct Staff to work with Edenvale and The Preserve in two areas: 1) Staff to secure deeds to those lands which were agreed to be dedicated to the City in the original PUD, and 2) recommendation from Staff once the deeds have been secured. Motion carried unanimously. IC) Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,March 21, 1978 G. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-34, rezoning Cardarelle's Crosstown Industrial Park from Rural to I-2 Park and approval of rezoning agreement City Planner Enger spoke to Ordinance No. 77-34 and to the initialled changes in the rezoning agreement. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-34, rezoning Cardarelle's Crosstown Industrial Park from Rural to I-2 Park. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the rezoning agreement with the initialled changes. Motion carried unanimously. H. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-01, approving rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park & Office for Crosstown Park by Anderson and rezoning agreement MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-01, approving rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park & Office for Crosstown Park by Anderson. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the rezoning agreement. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Arbor Celebration (Penzel) Penzel spoke to Proclamation and communication received from Commissioner Bill Walker, Minnesota Department of Transportation, and Clare Rossini, Arbor Month Coordinator, dated February 24, 1978. Pauly suggested that nurseries be contacted within the City to offer a special price for residents of Eden Prairie to promote the Arbor celebration. Osterholt requested that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission come up with an official Eden Prairie tree. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt the Proclamation proclaiming April 28, 1978 as "Arbor Day", and May as "Arbor Month", and instruct Staff to develop an effective celebration. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Appointment of 2 members to the Joint Zoning Board for the Metropolitan Airports Commission Ulstad explained he and Planner Enger had visited with Mr. Finney from the Metropolitan Airports Commission and he indicated the • State Law does require MAC to appoint a Joint Zoning Board. If we do not comply MAC will proceed to do it anyway. Bill Herbert, 11030 Northmark Drive, volunteered his services as he IS a Judge Advocate in the Air Force and has information available to him regarding this area. Council members thanked Mr. Herbert for his concern and welcomed his input. 3U • Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,March 21, 1978 2. Appointment of 2 members to the Joint Zoning Board for the Metropolitan Airports Commission (continued) MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to instruct the City Manager to draft a resolution appointing Bill Bye and Joan Meyers as members of the Joint Zoning Board with the recommendation that Mayor Penzel be designated the Chairman. Motion carried unanimously. B. Report of City Attorney 1. Status on flying jets out of Flying Cloud Airport as ruled by Judge Lebedoff City Attorney Thorfinnson explained that Judge Lebedoff will be hearing our motion at 8:30 AM on March 30, 1978. Thorfinnson further reported as to the status of the Rauenhorst trial presently in progress. C. Report of City Manager 1. Receive and award bids for 2 Satellite Stations and an addition to the main facility for the Fire Department City Manager Ulstad explained that bids for the 2 Satellite Stations and an addition to the main facility for the Fire Department have come in at approximately $11D,DDD.D0 above the base established prior to detailed plans and specifications compiled for bid purposes. Recommended that the Council consider denying all bids received and request that staff direct the consulting architect to redesign plans and specifications to comply accordingly. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to deny all bids received for the 2 Satellite Stations and an addition to the main facility for the Fire Department, requesting staff to direct the consulting architect to redesign plans and specifications, and that advertisement for bids be set for April 19, bids received May 10, and awarding of bids for May 16, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Public Property Reforestation Tree Bids Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to memo dated March 17, 1978, from City Forester Stuart Fox. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to accept the low bid on 6 varieties of trees from Arteka, Inc., in the amount of $5,95D.75, and the bid from M. T. Wiley on 5 varieties of trees in the amount of $6,03D.D0. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Meyers, Bye, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 2. Preserve "Name the Park" Contest City Manager Ulstad referred to memo from Sandy Werts, Recreation Supervisor, dated March 17, 197B, and minutes from the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission dated March 6, 1978. Yj Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,March 21, 1978 2. Preserve "Name the Park" Contest (continued) MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to accept the recommendation of the Subcommittee and the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to name the Preserve Neighborhood Park "Nesbitt Preserve Park". Motion carried unanimously. Council members suggested that Timothy Buckman, who won the "Name the Park" Contest,be asked to participate in planting the first tree or in helping to put the sign up. E. Report of City Engineer 1. Consider bids for utility and street improvements for Country Vista and Nygren Estates, I. C. 51-312, and I. C. 51-316 City Engineer Jullie spoke to communication from Rieke, Carroll, Muller Associates, Inc., dated March 15, 1978, and to Resolution No. 78-45. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 78-45, accepting bid for I.C. 51-312 and 316, and awarding the bid to Richard Knutson, Inc. in the amount of $173,900.40, the low responsible.bidder. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Pauly, Bye, Meyers and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 2. Receive feasibility report and set hearing date for utility and street improvements for Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition. I. C. 51-319 City Engineer Jullie spoke to Resolution No. 78-46 and the feasibility report submitted by Rieke, Carroll, Muller Associates, Inc. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 78-46, receiving feasibility report and calling for a hearing for April 1B, 1978 for utility and street improvements for Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Final plat approval for Maple Leaf Acres 5th Addition MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 78-49, approving the final plat for Maple Leaf Acres 5th Addition. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Receive feasibility report and set hearing date for utility and street improvements on Lotus View Drive, I.C. 51-321 City Engineer Jullie introduced Larry Gardner, Registered Professional Engineer with Bather, Ringrose & Wolsfeld, whose firm developed the feasibility report. Mr. Gardner answered questions of Council members pertaining to same. • MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 78-47, receiving feasibility report and calling for a hearing for I. C. 51-321 for May 2, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. 9n, Council Minutes - 9 - Tues.,March 21. 1978 IX. NEW BUSINESS A. Communication regarding power of local airport operators Mayor Penzel referred to letter from Kent Barker and reply from Congressman Bill Frenzel regarding the power of local airport operators. B. Bill regarding Chemical Waste Disposal Site Study General discussion took place regarding the expenses incurred pertaining to the Chemical Waste Disposal Site Study. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, that Staff document bills incurred for providing services which brought the Chemical Waste Disposal Site study to a logical conclusion,and send same to the Pollution Control Agency. Motion carried unanimously. C. Addition to the administrative staff in the Engineering area • City Manager Ulstad spoke to a request from City Engineer Jullie to add a certified civil engineer whose basic qualifications would be in the area of transportation, at an entry level of about $15,000.00 a year. Osterholt questioned if that person would preclude using some of the consulting services and if we would cave money. Jullie responded in the affirmative. Ulstad explained he would come back with the request to transfer funds into the General Fund, and at the earliest we could possibly hire someone by the first of June. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to authorize the Manager to advertise for a certified civil engineer. Motion carried unanimously. Additional New Business: A. Guide Plan Meeting MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Penzel, to set Thursday, March 3D, 1978, 7:00 PM, as a Special Council Meeting to discuss the Guide Plan. Motion carried unanimously. • B. Penzel noted that Bob Williams, one of Eden Prairie's representatives on the South Hennepin Human Services Council, will be resigning. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adjourn the Council meeting at 10:50 PM. Motion carried unanimously. SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY, MARCH 30, 1978 7:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad and Planning Director Chris Enger The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Mayor Penzel. Roll Call was taken: Meyers, Osterholt and Penzel present; Bye and Pauly absent. Goals and objectives were reviewed by members of the Council present., Suggested changes were discussed and the Council requested Staff to provide additional recommendations for Council consideration at their next Special Guide Plan meeting. Meeting stood adjourned at 10:15 PM. • • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 1978 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Ross Thorfinnson; Planner Chris Enger; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; City Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION: Councilwoman Joan Meyers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: A11 members present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the agenda as published. Motion carried unanimously. II. CONSENT CALENDAR Osterholt requested that agenda items VI. D. 1, 2 and 3, and VI. E. 1, with the exception of the Olympic Hills liquor license, be placed under the Consent Calendar. Meyers further requested that approval of the Olympic Hills liquor license be placed under the Public Hearings category as IV. I. All Council members agreed with these requests. A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-12, amending Ordinance No. 152, and providing for the regulation and licensing of advertising signs B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-13, amending Ordinance No. 261, and regulating and requiring permits for signs and imposing a penalty C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-52, amending Ordinance No. 111, Community Based Services Board D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-51, amending Ordinance No. 77-2, changing name of the Human Rights Commission to the Human Rights and Services Commission E. Payment of Claims Nos. 9146 - 9281 F. Setting of a Public Hearing for May 2, 197B for Raven Ridge Addition in Edenvale 3rd Addition G. Consider bids for pumphouse #3 and appurtenances, I. C. 51-301A T esolution No. 78-63) - (formerly item VI. D. 1 on Council agenda) • L' • Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,April 4, 1978 II. CONSENT CALENDAR (continued) H. Easement agreement with NSP for Pumphouse #3 (formerly item VI. D. 2 on Council agenda) I. Resolution setting hearing date for Dell Road/Valley View Road Improvements, I. C. 51-326 (Resolution No. 78-64) - (formerly item VI. D. 3 on Council agenda) J. Clerk's License List, excluding Olympic Hills liquor license request (formerly item VI. E. 1 on Council agenda) MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve all items listed on the Consent Calendar. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Pauly, Bye, Meyers and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. III. MINUTES A. Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 14, 1978 MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 14, 1978, as published. Motion carried unanimously. B. Special City Council Meeting held Monday, March 20, 1978 MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Monday, March 20, 1978, as published. Motion carried urarimnusly. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Round Lake Area Trunk Sewer, Watermain and Street Improvements, I. C. 51-315 (Resolution No. 78-62) City Engineer Jullie spoke to Resolution No. 78-62, his memo dated April 4, 1978 outlining the 3 alternatives for the extension of Luther Way, and answered questions of Council members. Penzel requested that information submitted from Mr. David Pavelka, 16725 Luther Way, and communication from Mr. Robert Williams, 16600 Luther Way dated April 3, 1978, be made part of the permanent record. Mr. Pavelka, 16725 Luther Way, spoke to his communication in detail, and requested the Council to vote "no" on the proposal as presented. Cliff Wiese, 16680 Luther Way, also spoke in opposition to the or-normal. Cliff Swenson, resident of Bloomington and one of the purchasers of the Savaryn property, would like to work with the City in any way that •will please people in the area, as he is anxious to get something going this year. Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,April 4, 1978 A. Round Lake Area Trunk Sewer, Watermain and Street Improvements, I. C. 51-315 (continued) MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue the Public Hearing for Round Lake Area Trunk Sewer, Watermain and Street Improvements to May 2, 1978, and instruct Staff to meet with the residents and property owners to work out the best possible solution. Motion carried unanimously. Council directed City Engineer Jullie to work with Mr. Eliason, the developer, on whatever problems he may have. Bye urged Staff to keep the State Department of Transportation informed on what we are doing which would affect Highway #5. B. Anderson Rezoning of a 22 foot strip west of 1-5 District, lying in the NW corner of Valley View Road and Washington Avenue City Planner Enger spoke to the proposal referring to the recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission at their meeting held February 13, 1978, and memo from City Engineer Jullie dated December 2, 1977. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to close the Public Hearing and give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 78-20, rezoning of a 22 foot strip for Richard Anderson, lying in the NW corner of Valley View Road and Washington Avenue, from Rural to I-5 Park. Motion carried unanimously. C. Bryant Lake View Estates, Thelma Griffith Haynes Property. Request for rezoning from Rural to R1-22, and preliminary plat approval of 26 lots on approximately 24 acres Jack Lynch, Bather-Ringrose-Wolsfeld, representing Mrs. Haynes, spoke to the proposal and answered questions of Council members. City Planner Enger spoke to the Planning Commission meetings held February 13 and February 27, 1978, and the March 13, 197B Planning Commission meeting whereby a recommendation for approval was adopted. Enger further outlined the Planning Staff Report dated February 15, 1978, and answered questions of Council members pertaining to same. Meyers questioned whose responsibility is the dirt mound and who would bear the cost. Enger replied that since a problem exists with the sight line distance, that if additional traffic is brought in by the development it is the Staff's recommendation and also the Planning Commissions that the developer do this improvement within the right-of-way with his development. Penzel asked if the diseased trees on this property have been removed prior to the April deadline. Enger responded the diseased trees have not been removed and they were tagged last year. However, Enger stated, it is the recommendation in the Staff Report that the trees be cleaned •up. Osterholt questioned if there would be any severe problems for a storm sewer in this area. Enger responded there is a high potential for erosion in this area which is one of the main problems of the massive gradings,and that a close look has to be given by the Watershed District 411 Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,April 4, 1978 C. Bryant Lake View Estates, Thelma Griffith Haynes Property (continued) and Staff to insure that proper sedimentation procedures are followed. Dick Anderson, Chairman of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, explained it is important we address ourselves to the accesses to Bryant Lake Park,because not only do we have this development under discussion, but also Super Valu. William Garens, member of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, agreed with Dick Anderson about needed accesses to Bryant Lake Park, as 99% of the citizens live to the southwest and he feels there is need for accesses across Highway #494 for children. Mr. Robert Fransen, 6851 Beach Road, stated he thinks the access to . Bryant Lake Park is adequate, and it would be ridiculous to have an access over Highway #494. . MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 78-60, approving the preliminary plat for Bryant Lake View Estates. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-19, rezoning from Rural to R1-22 the 26 lots on approximately 24 acres for Bryant Lake View Estates, Thelma Haynes Property. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to direct the City Attorney to draft a rezoning agreement incorn,rating recommendations of the February 15, 1978, Planning Staff Report on page 7, items 1. a - e and 2, and also including that the eastern end of the through street be signed to denote it as a temporary deadend. Motion carried unanimously. D. Pheasant Oaks, Burmith, Inc., request for preliminary plat approval and rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 96 single family detached homes on 55 acres Mr. Richard Smith, Burmith, Inc., introduced Ron Bastyr, McCombs- Knutson Associates, who outlined the proposal and answered questions of Council members. City Planner Enger spoke to the Planning Commission meeting March 13, 1978, whereby a recommendation for approval was adopted. Enger further explained that due to the lateness of the hour the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission did not have a chance to consider this proposal at their meeting held April 3, 1978. Director of Community Services Bob Lambert explained that a special Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission meeting has been set for Monday, April 10, 1978, at which time this proposal will be considered. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to continue the Public Hearing •for Pheasant Oaks to April 18, 1978, when a report from the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission will be available. Motion carried unanimously. YaX Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,April 4, 1978 D. Pheasant Oaks, Burmith, Inc. (continued) Ron Bastyr asked if the Council would take action on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet as this has to go through the governmental agencies and it is important that it be started as soon as possible. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 78-55, approving the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Pheasant Oaks by Burmith, Inc., contingent upon favorable action by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at their meeting to be held Monday, April 10, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. E. Super Valu Stores, Inc., request for PUD Amendment to Major Center Area PUD for a 140 acre site, and rezoning of 37 acres from Rural to Office for corporate headquarters to be located on south end of Bryant Lake City Manager Ulstad explained that the Super Valu proposal has been heard before the Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, and the proponents have visited with property owners in and around the area. Howard Loomis, Super Valu, introduced Bob Dill and Gene Stormoen from Ellerbe & Associates. Mr. Dill showed graphic illustrations of the site and outlined the proposal. • City Planner Enger spoke to the recommendation for approval from the Planning Commission and to Staff Reports dated March 7 and March 23, 1978. Enger also referred to the communic_`ion from the Hennepin County Department of Transportation dated April 3, 1978. Enger stated Super Valu is prepared to amend their rezoning to 35 acres so that the area remaining essentially would be unbuildable. Osterholt raised a concern about the balance of the property and if there are any suggestions being made as to what the future use might be. Mr. Dill replied there are no plans for the land and it was purchased so Super Valu could control their neighbors. Enger noted there is no request for zoning of the rest of the property. Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to the concerns expressed by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at their April 3, 1978 Commission meeting, i.e., trail around Valley View or Bryant Lake Park, land dedication and encroachment on the pond. Dick Anderson, Chairman of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, explained the Commission has concerns about the trail system and accesses. Concerned about providing an access to the recreation area. When a developer comes in especially along a natural resources area, there has been a certain amount of dedication. In this proposal there has been no proposed dedication to the City, only that in cash park fee. We have set a certain precedent in this community, and this proposal would not go along with this precedent. Osterholt explained the area shown as open space will be scenic easements and will be left undeveloped by the developer, and would service the community and residents. Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,April 4, 1978 E. Super Valu Stores, Inc. (continued) William Garens, member of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, stated this is a good proposal for the site, but his reservations are with the trail system. 95% of the people have a poor access to get to a major access to a major park. Bye explained it should be pointed out that the problem Eden Prairie has had in acquiring and developing parklands is traced to one similar thing - money. Approximately $40,000 will be contributed by Super Valu to be set aside as their contribution for cash park fee. Jerry Carnes, 7036 Willow Creek Road, spoke in favor of the Super Valu proposal, complimenting Super Valu and Ellerbe for working with the people in the area and coming up with a proposal that is fair and equitable. Don Sorensen, 7121 Willow Creek Road, explained he is pleased with the efforts Super Valu has made, however, expressed concern about the modification of the Major Center Area Plan with this particular setting involved. Sorensen also suggested if a trailway easement is going to be provided along Valley View some thought should be given to placing a fence on the inside from the sight standpoint of that trailway system. Mr. Loomis explained Super Valu has same concerns about the misuse of the property,but hoped it would not be necessary to construct a fence. However, Super Valu will take whatever steps necessary to protect the property. Penzel stated the recommendation for a scenic easement has come up a number of times. Mr. Loomis responded it is Super Valu's understanding that through the zoning process they are just rezoning this particular site, and the City has a great deal of control through zoning and permits as to the remaining area. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 78-52, approving the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Super Valu. Motion carried unanimously. Meyers requested that Resolution No. 78-51 be amended in the first line of the second "WHEREAS" clause by adding "conceptual". MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 78-51 as amended, granting request for a PUD Amendment to the Major Center PUD for a 140 acre site for Super Valu. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 78-14, rezoning of 35 acres from Rural to Office for Super Valu's corporate headquarters. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to direct the City Attorney to draft a developers agreement for the PUD Amendment incorporating land uses as shown for office space and open space only, removing the remaining land • use designations of housing and commercial from the Major Center Area original PUD. Further incorporating recommendations of the Hennepin County Department of Transportation for accesses as per communication dated April 3, 1978, restrictions of any docks or piers on the entire PUD parcel, open space to remain unaltered and in natural state, no clearing along lakes other than 1 Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,April 4, 1978 • E. Super Valu Stores, Inc. (continued) dead vegetation, Super Valu to dedicate all of the land below the 854 contour as scenic easement, and Super Valu to dedicate trail easement along Valley View Road. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to direct the City Attorney to draft a rezoning agreement for the 35 acre office site for Super Valu, including recommendations of the March 7 and March 23, 197B Staff reports, allowing height variances and parking variances. Motion carried unanimously. F. Hillsborough and Hillsborough Second, The Preserve, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5,and preliminary plat approval of 80 acres into 149 lots Don Hess, representing The Preserve, outlined the proposal as presented to the Planning Commission with the exception of a few modifications. City Planner Enger explained the proposal was considered at the Planning Commission on February 13, February 27, and March 13, 1978, and that there were considerable changes from the initial time it was reviewed until action was taken. Rod Sundstrom, Chairman of the Planning Commission, stated the Commission does not disagree with the land use of single family residential, but does not agree with the platting as proposed. Further that the platting was no reason to ;eve a PUD approval because the Commission did not see any trade-offs that would warrant approval. Sundstrom noted the proposal went through a lot of changes from the 1st time the Planning Commission saw it to the 2nd time. Director of Community Services Lambert explained that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission has not had a chance to review this proposal because of the lateness of their meeting, however would be doing so at their special meeting on Monday, April 10, 1978. Lambert stated Staff has some concerns as outlined in memos dated March 2 and March 23, 1978. Leroy Jedlicka, 12501 Pioneer Trail, explained in the proposal The Preserve shows accesses on his land and he has been at his present location since 1968 and nobody has contacted him to buy his land. Mr. Jedlicka also spoke to the extreme noise from the airport which would affect homes proposed in the development, and questioned the price of the homes to go into the area. Mr. Hagen, BanCon, replied to $70,000. the prices of the homes would range from $60,000 Bye stated it is the job of the Council to react to proposals as they have gone through the Commissions and staff. Further that he felt it would be inappropriate for the Council to take any action because the proposal as outlined this evening is different than what the Commissions and Staff 'have considered. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, that the Hillsborough and Hillsborough 2nd be referred back to Staff, the Planning Commission and Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission for consideration, to be back to the Council on May 16, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,April 4, 1978 G. Amsden Hills III, The Preserve, request to preliminary plat 32 acres for single family, multi-family, and park uses; and to rezone 16 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 with variances for approximately 30 lots City Planner Enger spoke to Staff Report dated January 25, 1978, and to the recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission. Director of Community Services Lambert explained that his department does not have a Staff Report but concurs with the Planning Staff Report, and that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission has recommended approval. Penzel requested that the communication from Mr. & Mrs. John Wastvedt, 9166 Neill Lake Road, be entered into the permanent record in opposition to the proposal. Osterholt questioned if the deeds had been received. John Gerts, The Preserve, explained once the final plat has been approved it will be filed at the County, then the deeds will be available to the City. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to close the Public Hearing and give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 78-18, rezoning 16 acres for Amsden Hills III, The Preserve, from Rural to R1-13.5. Meyers, Pauly, Bye and Penzel voted "aye", Osterholt voted "nay". Motion carried. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 78-56, approving the revised preliminary plat dated February 27, 1978. Pauly, Bye, Meyers and Fenzel voted "aye", Osterholt voted "nay". Motion carried. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to direct the City Attorney to draft a rezoning agreement including the cul-de-sac be maintained by the Homeowers Association, developer to work with City Forester to determine the extent and method of tree removal during overall site development, removal of diseased dutch elm trees, and that overstory vegetation be established. Meyers, Pauly, Bye and Penzel voted "aye", Osterholt voted "nay". Motion carried. H. Minnesota Mini-Storage, 2nd Addition, request by Bruce Hubbard to rezone from Rural & Highway Commercial to 1-2 Park 3.06 acres for individual storage warehouse space Bruce Hubbard, Minnesota Mini-Storage, outlined the proposal and answered questions of Council members. City Planner Enger spoke to the Planning Commission meetings held January 23 and February 13, 1978 where a recommendation for approval was passed unanimously. Enger also referred to the Staff Report dated February 2, 1978. Director of Community Services Lambert outlined the recommendation for •approval by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at their meeting held Monday, March 6, 1978. Council Minutes - 9 - • Tues.,April 4, 1978 H. Minnesota Mini-Storage, 2nd Addition (continued) MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to close the Public Hearing and give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 78-21, rezoning 3.06 acres for Minnesota Mini-Storage for individual storage warehouse space from Rural & Highway Commercial to I-2 Park. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Meyer moved, seconded by Osterholt, to direct the City Attorney to draft a rezoning agreement incorporating 5 items in Staff Report dated February 2, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to continue the Council meeting past the 11:30 PM scheduled adjournment time. Motion carried unanimously. I. Olympic Hills Liquor License (formerly item E. 1 under Clerk's License List on Council agenda) MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the Liquor License for Olympic Hills. Motion carried unanimously. V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS No reports. VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIO"!! A. Reports of Council Members 1. Councilwoman Pauly Councilwoman Pauly referred to resolution pertaining to the South Hennepin Human Services Council. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 78-68, supporting the activities and leadership provided by the South Hennepin Human Services Council and urging the Hennepin County Board to continue funding as they have in the past. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Mayor Penzel a. Penzel referred to communication asking for suggestions for Outstanding Women in America. b. Mayor Penzel brought up for discussion the transfer of deeds to park properties. City Manager Ulstad explained there are two deeds, one for 2.2 acres for the purpose of a fire station location, and the second for 41.77 acres for the balance of the property. The 1st deeds does not j. have any restrictions, the 2nd has the following restriction: "Subject to the restriction that no roadway or public thoroughfare shall be located or constructed upon the described premises without the express and prior consent of the Grantor", the grantor being Independent School District No. 272. f; Council Minutes - 10 - Tues.,April 4, 1978 b. Transfer of deeds (continued) MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 78-74, ordering a Feasibility Report for Valley • View Road from County Road 4 to State Highway #lUl based on the general transportation plan concept. Motion carried unanimously. Council directed the City Attorney to draft a resolution accepting the deeds to include the Council is not satisfied with the restriction on the 2nd deed. B. Report of City Attorney City Attorney Thorfinnson spoke to the order received from Judge Amdahl on Rauenhorst. Thorfinnson also recommended that until we get good evidence that there is jet noise in violation of Ordinance No. 51,that the City should not spend any time or money to go into Court. C. Report of City Manager No report. D. Report of City Engineer 1. Consider bids for pumphouse #3 and appurtenances, I. C. 51-301A (Item II. G. on the Consent Calendar) 2. Easement agreement with NSP for Pumphouse #3 (Item II. H. on the Consent Calendar) 3. Resolution setting hearing date for Dell Road/Valley View Road Improvements, I. C. 51-326 (Item II. J. on the Consent Calendar) VII. NEW BUSINESS No New Business. VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adjourn the Council meeting at 12:20 AM. Motion carried unanimously. td1% Gt-, rF�� ' I urge the City Council to vote no on the proposed exten$ion to Luther Way for the following reasons: Desigr of Luther 'vJa 1 . Luther Way was designed and built 13 years ago to serve a small residential neighorhood. It is adequate for its initial intent. 2. It is inadequate to handle the volume of traffic that will be generated by the proposed 250 additional units in these respects: A. Width Two cars cannot safely *feet when a (26') car is parked on the road. B. Sidewalks There are ns sidewalks, so many children with wheeled vehicles use the street. Intersection of Luther '�Ja with County Road 4. 1 . Substantial improvements would be required to the intersection of Luther Way and County Road 4 in order to i:ardl: tha projected traffic. 2. Traffic generator existing on Luther Way in addition to the residential traffic are! A. Church B. Day Care Center C. Nursery School 3. Within a few hundred feet of this intersection arc: A. The major entrance to Round Lake Park B. Two major entrances to the Prairie Village • Shopping Mall. 4. A few hundred feet beyond this on County Road 4 the following traffic generators are located A. The Westgate Housing Additions. B. Lil Red Store C. E. P. Library 5. The paved shoulder on the Luther Way side of Cty Rd 4 is designated as a bicycle path. Proxir:it^ to Round Lake Park 1•. Round Lake Park is a magnet which draws pedestrian traffic (toddlers to ,eenagers) from the reighborhood.. Crossirg Luther Way will be a hazard since: A. Luther Way currently is a "straight shot" B. Extended as prorosed will encourage tarxi!lum V!;hicular speed. Alternative solutions to the problems generated Laz the development of the '3liason nrenerty. 1. Develop a north exit from Heritage to the new Valley View Road. 2. Design the new Valley View Road wide enough to accomodate the 250 units. 3. Design a properp intersection of Valley View Road with County Road ,with stop lights. General Comments 1. It appears as though the proposed extention to Luther Way will create more problems than it solves.. t 2. The proposed Luther Way extention merely transfers a ma d fficult problem of entrance and exit from Reritage at ighway to the intersection of Luther Way and Cty Rd 4+. Final recomendation 1. All planning of the Luther 'W.,7' extention stop until after a concret plan has been adopted, funded and scheduled for the new Valley View Road. 2. The Luther Way extention is a "stop-gap" solution to a bigger problem. Stop-gap solutions have a way of becoming permanent. We have enough of these already. Let's not make Luther Way do a job it was never intended to do. Th you f c�.sideration, /� � David L. Pavelka 16725 Luther Way Eden Prairie, Mn. Home: 94+1 8791 Office: 941 2230 . We, the undersigned, are opposed to the extention of Luther Way as nror.nned under Public Improvents I. C. 51-315 and urge the City Council to vote against the project. • ( . ,,Pine - , . address 1• .:' •te//;.--' )"Li'-'( /4.725 /..../hft. it gl-) 2. t..,: -e 'et' a:.C.L.-`" -1 /(o[L, t....1,17 (lc' 3- ...-\...;Z....,--,,.... i. ', •, ,; . • . • • !(,t.i,te i 11,(_ ,'....1.il i,.t.il.i1/ it:640 ,,L-Li,•tc i,...i,"t4,) <,....t' , ../ ‘ . , ii-cc ,'2,-',-fr_,1,•,•• .-i7r; ,-‘:/ • .;-, (t- . /,,• r-./-- 7 6; ,,\.(/,'.eci../ (i. 7k_ce Xe.=477,,-2(..(4.,,,- , Cf-1• 7. //;‘,-ritti (.''‘7•59,-1(7-'4.17 , n c. .. . ,\ I-1 . AeSD 1\\CC L, L,-C (C-P. r.i ,i,t..•.L. ./' c...s., -,,, - i 7.7(6 -14i;,.‘,.. -4-,..,,,,,,. L.?. . 1 11. i. -t ' ..- —7/cc,- .‘it::: : ,i- •-- , ''.: -1- - - ; 7,1 c /1,! ,,,.,1,..' Lc:ia; - ,• / , 1 2. ,( L,eu,j, ‘,..1-1 /7 4./..,.6 )--fi' 13. , ... .. l, ' ,..,, ., , ' / ) /' , , i\'':_• '';`..t.. k_V. .—)'''---"'s( 1 • —2'i'''‘\.\I\Al 7.‘ (7 6...4'• .., (—' I, L)-- ' (-4- ' - '- - ;',3 LIN., • 7 i)- A.7Li.Ati 1 G. • - ---- . \ i),..., , ,. . -; 5 - \ . \ c ,,• c-c-, c t 17. -4., •,..'..,< c- -;.,,...,/ 7 ./,e'// ,,,,.. i,//./ ••• . . /'• , _. - / -,'• . 1.2, \. 1-•• -/ / ; -.. c'•'• f_ v.<</ ,S7,-, , •' -, '6-j > '' ,...,'('‘(c, (.:•_ ,k'r,-/c • , .„, 20. / ,..^.t.t.4-1‘;`,\ 1- (1,1,k..t.:','-. •\ (1 . L - .• . 21 b .... ? "'Yr.,' ,1`. --.,--,---,,'',"-- ' // ,,,- '''''''' i P.:-(ii.//1,,,e -S:11.-74-f to•-' 22. / . . . , .23 . ,,,, ,_ / e, Pi /i.•,-/ ) . 1440u I-5,44A .i ,. /,1. i i .Lif„ .. . / • • 4 25.//I",..(21-..---:->'";-, I) 40 (11 ,,1;:ol 5, , L.' ),,,,,411....i -• .9- .1 9 • , i /(s t ($.//) i-1 -;•'•1. 1 , ,i; /zij, v,,,J-r,-- • -, , ' S•3r) . . • .,,,,,)/:, Li). - ,. ., . . , . ,,,./;,-. ,;„•,,.;..... , Wei the undersigned, are opposed to t} extention of Luther Way as proposed under Public Improvements I.C. 51-315 and urge the - • City Cou'cil to vote against the project. aMe address y� -1 i28. .� 29. X..0.4"°- j ! '--J A,/��i a , --iG�c... w a. 30• .`-- ,,,.�/..��-.-. ..c-,�,�G 7 o f ..a-4. %4.� 31• Ica- -t LZ, /t 7 i/ .14-- . �,� ' J' 33. , 44i /6 540 .C�(: ek'u.M .) 34•S\i•-<,...c,--�S�,�� 35. / .5 i f 656 o ,zrl CGit/ � 37. r.u_.r../ ,..v.k,- � 38. s...)1 e,c_ ,.)0.1 c 16 5 D 0 1. rkko a- •-u(a... 39. ,.,:::n>>,—t- . ),<�`.1 (( 5?co ?,Di(c2 ...›o.,- 40. ;�^er c`.L-)t ,r'•• '5y0 R-',7,.-{.;�_C: i- 50. /t".z-. .. r,, !�!/-, /['F C-r•<-:r--zf t.'. j r 52. ' ? . L-,,,_ /cJ-c_L,e /( j 7!, «-�.� e ;I-7 53. ,Z c.r //it L /G 0''(i i .75(',77,7 i 1C. 54. 'M r�t:t•�..,/:) /G„2ao CGz.:1. <<.! G. � , r 1/ 56,,;�}i',.c 1 -- , .�:,-/ �iL•..) s�/ 0.%c. (s/1:ie k-=rµ/ �«._ .-. • . / tee 58 ~_ ciyi� ;,, 3• f :✓._: •_. . :-•� , . --, i : ,- , .-' 9g We, the undersigned, are opposed to the extention of' Luther Way as proposed under Public Improvements I.C. 51-315 and urge the City Council to vote against the project. Name Address • 61.: ',,„ ..,.,,- , \ ...,,,,:ci 62. •‘-(2 - . 2.4‘,...4.7 ti /e/77ef . . .,._ .// 63. Af izziL.A.,_ A,..iii,,3/ 6://,/ ..0 ,/,..,,,z6.,,,...t _..... , , ___ L. .-- - 4-/-, , ut. <• ,'4-,,-t- --,.. , /..:5.c-c, s)(• -" ''' 65. -1,1, ,(.'71,,-Xv 110712,7-1,---7 7zteei 7 6.4 0 74-le i Y 66. 67 leLL:721-•:--,t- :/_-/e,-ykt:4 /61?/4 Yi-4-"d• 68. •:-.'4.44, (6 0—ii a...i 1& S 9 I litbaA si,.26 i",, 69. Kt___,-.-Lect_, -/si, L /6 3-7 - . 70. '-,../..t i. ...i 4,-,....;-,,,,,r- /6 r.:•<.57 71.,-.".? )A-,!. 72. av-„? -72,_.,..,....} It 2 3/ 73. '(------.9-7--\--- 2..._ _ ,-,--L, /&. / aiv-or.--5er---etA2'.V 711-. -i-ci-/-LL----‘-</,.....— X.,/e/P4'.,i-,'67,---4; ii-l'il•••" 76. /(,/1,7 Y,?''1,/ ,/1,,,,/,:fir, -- 77.e:'.1. 'e.e 1C-,',1?-1.4te-re-OU / ae itLetui:/,.2,e_ 4-I, • 78. ‘,.,_..,4e- :,/,-A:.',- /e..,7 ) , 79.A1l,L0,,,__ is'e/ L-1/444,--ktt 1/14,4 0 ' 0 8 • 81* LI'/ii '/„.') (._ /0 ‘.' 7„ ' • •J . -; ,e...) .c.t,t --• - --,--, .4.,"" - j ..., t, ,...- - e; 83. 0(/' '-,,. /.4.e / /7/ a Ici///,(7/,•- .). ',4•C._ / /7- 4;1 d' • ia,/ / 85. /11,‘;`11 Clit . 1 31 4/3/78 D twuie i3 t U rat y�y TO: Members of the Eden Prairie City Council n1P/!I 413 • SUBJECT: Proposed Public Improvement Project I.C. 51-315 Residents of Luther Way and Meadow Lane received materials about the above proposed project about March 18, 1978. We had the opportunity to meet with city staff and find out the details (as they existed) concerning these planned changes on March 30, 1978. This proposed "public improvement" appeared very threatening to most of the households that would be directly affected. It would drastically change the environ- ment that we have all been used to over the years. I am sure that in your positions as council members you have heard, many times before, the concerns of households, parents and neighbors that any proposed changes will be to their detriment. My basic concerns about Project I.C. 51-315 are that it would unalterably change the complexion of this previously isolated neighborhood and greatly increase the traffic burden in this area and create a public safety hazard. In • addition, any decision about extending Luther Way should be decided coincidentally with a final decision on the route for the Valley View extension past the new high school. With these concerns in mind, I would make the following comments. Using some basic demographic and traffic analysis data provided in the hennepin County Tranzporta*ion System Study (HCTSS) dated December, 1975, I have tried to estimate current and anticipated automobile daily trips in the affected area of existing Luther Way. Assuming approximately 80 persons on Luther Way and Meadow Lane today, and assuming 2.72 daily trips per person (HCTSS, p.21) (this includes auto trips, truck trips, and transit trips) , this would result in a current trips per day level of approximately 220 vehicles. The maps we received covering this project showed the following proposed or existing potential lots that would be expected to egress to Highway 5 via Luther Way: ADDITION LOTS J Heritage Park 1st 31 Round Lake Estates: 1st &'2nd 52 Round Lake Estates: 3rd add. 47 Parcel #10 (west of Luther Way) 51 181 Assuming that these 181 households contain 4.20 persons each (HCTSS 1-6) , and assuming 2.72 daily trips per person, this would amount to an additional potential 2,070 trips per day down Luther Way, This would represent a traffic vehicle increase of almost 85O%*. • 'it o Page 7 Mo- This staggering increase in traffic would no doubt increase the risk to residents (not just the children) on Luther Way. I would also doubt that existing Luther Way was designed to have this traffic load. (2,000 vehicles per day is about 25% of the current traffic flow on County Rd. 94 in the affected area.) We are not unaware of the problems of the current residents of Heritage and Round Lake Estates in trying to go east onto Highway 45. But easing their problems, while creating a new potential hazard for the residents of Luther Way, is not a good solution. I would request that the City Council direct the City Staff to look for additional alternatives that would reduce the problems of exiting onto Highway 45 but would also not shift the problem to the households on Luther Way. One suggested alternative and one which I believe most house- holds on Luther Way can live with, would be to extend Luther Way to collect the traffic from parcel tl10 west of Luther Way (approximately 51 lots proposed) . Traffic from Heritage and Round Lake Estates would be run north to the extended Valley View Road. Additionally, a "greenway" could be set aside that would go from Round Lake south to Highway n5 (this greenway was originally proposed two or three years ago as part of the total City Open Space systems) (See map) . This alternative would increase rile traffic on Luther Way by about 170%**, which is substantial, but it recognizes that we cannot remain isolated (as in the past) and provides for orderly ingress/eggress; it keeps a greenway buffer that helps protect the southwestern section of the park ; and it provides a medium to handle the problems of the residents in Heritage and Round Lake Estates. We all have a stake in achieving some accomodation. Citizen disenchantment must be balanced against the requirements to develop this community. I only ask that an orderly, safe and enfironmentally sound plan be developed. Developmental rights don't necessarily run with the land but are created by yourselves and allocated by you (our representatives) to the particular land involved. 1 *Admittedly, residents of Heritage Park and Round Lake Estates 1st Add. will find it more convenient to ingress directly via Highway 5; the•est.imate for current traffic on Luther Way did not account for the trips generated by the ABC Day Care Center, the ABC Nursery, and the Immanuel Lutheran Church. ** 51 H.H. @ 4.2/H.H. = 214 people @ 2.72 trips/person 582 trips/day ' Very truly yours, W114-4\\VV.103 Robert K. Williams 16600 Luther Way ('4' // // - ) _.I...DV.'"-2' -\ // / / r/ ra, .N /r r:-..,- 0 :7-c...-- ...".....• , - --- .... ---- _ -------\ I u. 1 t rj . I I LI x I I 1 t4 m It 3 Pt II F.1 0 c • , , •• o ... •• ‘.,•- , -. I I m ,,, SO 1)' i I'u. Itl i PI E‘1 A '11 Z VI- ‘ \ ..,.. , „I 4. • ,,. •.,, \ ... I I I I I I I I / // /// . ------ fd ,., ^ III/ \ 7._m , . _ _(-17... s i .:;.:.. ) z •.) 31v1.41.3u ' CA-Z..1J_.o'4') ' ,-.4••••_;', .`;',...) p-fil 1.:.:_] Ili \ 1 ,C f i I P. A::",,, I •-.. )--4 1 ... 1 • i 1 -., I i :i.• 1 1:.-:' s's I ir.--I I f? i / ou7. I. - `. ;—1 ,',4,1---e; , PI, T1,,*-• , I i 1 \ \ ....:4_,_,,,,• >>.,--" 11/ \N, .7„.„,-e4Th..--•cf •I'i:/•--1.1: 1- 7Y/ :•-•• :::•:.::.:::.::::::: 7/ • '-'4 'Ll •::: :..:ti: :/: • r _ 1-• ../:;:::":::::::::::: ::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: 0 \ I 1-4 _v 0 A.. -- - \cf^ toi..•--- + •W____ ,1"--,' 1 1 0 :A ,,,,,,9,1 • N. re. ch ':::::::::N:::::::. :::.:::::: c,)•1 r ‘ , ,.3 i ..:-.......:::::::::: .:::. _____ll •...„__ -- \ _ c i'-- . ,..- ,..:..i L N , / ///61° : • /4 // / i//i 4 1 , 1 L t . -- Cl I I _ r I V.P.1 r i1 4 — -- ----- [I- --__ - [. _ --.'•,--,'''Y'r"--1 \.-- .- 11:: kr' ti 3i '9 7y G.s<>cc 71rx<l� l2�agE �,/ 71- 7 3c fAy..�.n G' 47f+-�✓ / -�/lZ.LG�"�r�� a�Jf7 ee ifiC U'» DI/ 7.0_1cG _ -.. /.ZN // .<-..c !�Jo..�cuf� U v✓ //ram I141" 9 g "-." u.t�.•� - like -Z.Lrar ceeta - G , Glz 2 /irk-4 < 4 � s Ys�e -#_ /42 f '4 ' e(}jv-r-dL - ,tom++�C, �e.L ,sue ..j 'i"' /te �;!-!l��e:•c.q u st .r8Tr !CL(rt/� F�f1s�l.- • 4e /.-e-0 — ' 99Q47 11 a li. FQ � Q 7 //�r/su �c-ri 7/u Gj - - '— 1 vsY� � - � lit4rzte �f� 9/�6 �� "4. Ad m 6.S3flfl /� • • �/ `- �C,p�,"/� �` a`- Ale Ic • at L ✓/aes„ .te .,t; - ,Fr UNAPPROVED I•:INUTES EDEN PRAIRIE FARES. RECREATION AID NATURAL RESOURCES CQICISSION NCNDAY, APRIL 10, 1979 7:30 PE, CITY EALL SPECIAL I"hLTII:G b. Pheasant Oaks Lar:bert spoke to the Planning Coinission Memo of Earch 3rd and located the prosasal and the 2% land dedication boundaries. Pe explained the deve- lle had agreed to the building of tle necessary trail, with credit to be givenfrom the cash park fee for construction of the trail. Pe stressed • pinpointing the neighborhood park for this area because of the development pressure, and spoke to securing options Lambert answered questions about the use of cul-de-sacs in the area- explaining that they were difficult to maintain; whether there were storm sewers planned for- proposed pond with siltation basin; and whether the trail would cross over the road at street level-affirmative. Anderson asked whether it would be possible tohave an off street under- pass, noting that the Bikeway-fiikeway Task Force Report recomrends its use at some places. Lambert responded that he would check with the City • Engineer es to its expense, and thst it would have to be taken out of the cosh park fee in order to justify it. Ron Bastyr, EcCo:rbs-Enutson Associates, Inc., speaking to the propusal • and to the above suggestion, felt it could be accomplished through the use of a corregated metal pipe, with a wood facing-giving it the appearance of a natural bridge. Lambert referred to the LAW on the proposal, and asked that the FR& NR Commission, at the Council's request, review the worksheet. lk TIGi: ;,wrens moved to accept the Pheasant Caks proposal with the 20% open space dedication, siltation pond, assessed cash park fee-with cost of trail to be subtracted, and pedestrian underpass connecting outlots 3 and C best be assessed to cash park fee. Pruell seconded. Garens requested the addition to the I:CTICN: Recommend that the Staff research feasibility of the pedestrian underpass. WENDED It.TION: Garens moved to accept the Pheasant Oaks proposal with the 20% open since dedication, siltation pond, assess cash perk fee-with cost of trail to be subtracted, pedestrian underpass connecting outlots B and C cost be assessed to cash park fee, and recommend that the Staff research feasibility of the pedestrian underpass. Krucll seconded, notion carried unanimously. Lembcrt asked for questions or additions to the LAW, explaining that the Staff had reviewed it, and that the worksheet will go out to other pertinent units such as the watershed district. II TICIIs hruell moved that we recomend that the Council accept the EN/ as prepared, because it appears to he consistent with our recommendations and the intent of the developer. Garens seconded, motion carried unanimously. U April 18, 1978 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.78-70 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS (I,C, 51-319) WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 21st day of March, 1978, fixed the 18th of April, 1978, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 51-319, Utility and street improvements Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Add. and vicinity WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days of published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the re- quired notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 18th day of April, 1978; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement as set out in Council Resolution of March 21, 1978, and as above indicated is hereby ordered (and amended as follows.) 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and speci- fications for the making of such improvement, with the assist- ance of Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc., Consulting Engineers. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk ) 7.4� MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Unapproved Monday, April 10, I978 7:30 PM, City Hall COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sundstrom Retterath, Redpath, Lynch, Bearman, ��--�-- —V— Levitt COMMISSION ABSENT: McCulloch STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger Planning Director, Jean Johnson Planning Assistant 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Retterath moved, Redpath seconded, to approve the agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. 1I. MINUTES OF THE APRIL 27, 1978 MEETING P.2,B.,5P, should read - . increase the cost of the lots $1,000-2,D00. P.4,B.,6P, spelling of dominant 15P, should read- . . Mr. Levitt believed the 13 building . . . 10P, should read . . the proponent may not have to . . P.5,A., Add motion- McCulloch moved, Redpath seconded, to continue the Tamarac Woods public hearing to April 10th for a staff report. B.,2 P,should read - . . is an incorporated insurance . . Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to approve the minutes as submitted and corrected. Motion carried unanimously. III. MEMBERS REPORTS A. Chairman Sundstrom 1. Sundstrom informed the Conmission he attended the last Council meeting and submitted the Commission's motion on Hillsborough. He added the Hillsborough plat was referred back to the Planning Commission to review the revised plat. 2. Sundstrom asked the staff to list of present commission/ council members. B. Others none IV. REPORTS AND RECOMI1ENDATIONS A. Prairie Fast 4th,5th & 6th Additions, by Hustad Development for rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 for approximately 70 acres, and preliminary plat approval of approximately 200 units. The additions are located in the NW and NE quadrants of Co.Rd. 18 and Franlo Road. A continued public hearing. The Chairman asked the Planner if the proponents and the City staff had reached agreements as requested at the last commission meeting. The Planner summarized changes to the plats as ,follows: 4th Addition, corner lots fronting on Buckingham changed to meet front yard setback of 35 feet, and setbacks from Franlo revised to 50 feet except for 3 sideyards; 5th Addition, access to Co.Rd. 1 eliminated, 1 quad eliminated and additional size added to park; 6th Addition, Buckingham Drive access to Co.Rd. 1 eliminated, &lnts fronting on Franlo Road-some 3Dfeet setbacks-some meet 50 foot setback. il9 Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 10, 1978 • The Planner informed the Commission the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended approval of the two mini- parks as proposed by the proponent, but thePlanning and Park & Recreation Department staffs still recomunend one larger usable park for public ownership and maintenance, otherwise, the smaller two play areas should he owned and maintained by a homeowner association. lie then referred the Commission to the letters received from Hennepin County Highway Oepartment dated March 21st regarding the 5th & 6th Additions. Mr. Putnam, Hustads, concurred with the planners summary of resolutions made. He stated they talked with residents and believe they have met the concerns of the residents. Bearman inquired if theEngineering Oepartment has reviewed the two mini-parks and if they consider the area to be parkland or storm water ponds. The Planner responded of the 4.3 acre park proposed in the 4th Addition, approximately 1/3 of it is pond with additional land backyards more than play area. He stated Hustad's engineer's believe the pond can be confined to the southeast part of the area , but it will be deep, about 4-6 feet. Beannan expressed concern over the City's liability of ownership and maintenance of the totlots containing deep water ponds that may vary from 2-5 feet after heavy rains. REdpath inquired how many acres are within the park proposed by the 5th aoaition. Mr. Putnam estimated the size of the area to be 5.3 acres and stated the believe it is large enough for softball and Hustads will sod the area. Oon McGlyn, Olympic Hills Corporation, stated the Golf Club held a meeting today and voted to go on record in opposition to the lot size and setback variances being requested. He stated the Olympic Hllls 3rd & 4th Additions had to meet ordinance requirements at the request of the City. Mr. Putnam, Hustads, informed the Commission, the Bluffs 1,000 acre area will include possibly 500 acres of public/private open space. Redpath inquired if the proponent bases variance requests on ' possible ',not committed open space. . Putnam replied they will commit to open space whether it is purchased through agencies or through City cash park fee funds, and if some areas are unpurchasable. then they may be developed. Levitt stated that the possible 500 acres open space is not before the Planning Commission, there is not an overall PUO for the 1,000 acres, therefore what tradeoffs are proposed for the Prairie East Additions before the commission? Prairie Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 10, 1978 Mr. Putnam replied the project will provide a variety of housing types, 2 park areas, and be subject to cash park fee. Redpath stated he appreciates having all the additions submitted at once, but the densities are in excess of tradeoffsof 'maybe' 500 acre open space on an unapproved 1,000 acre PUD. He believed it would be unsafe to grant densities now on future open space. Motion 1: Redpath moved, Bearman seconded, to close the public hearing on Prairie East 4th,5th & 6th Additions. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 2: Redpath moved, Bearman seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the PUD approval on Prairie East 4th-6th for single family and multiple without specific densities. Motion carried unanimously. Redpath moved to recommend approval of the rezoning from Rural to to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 for the Prairie East 4th,5th & 6th Additions based upon the March 23, 1978 staff report. Mr. Putnam requested the commission to continue the hearings on the 4th & 6th Additions to allow him to advise the developers on the commission's concerns and determine if the projects are feasible under those conditions. Motion 3: Redpath moved, Bearman seconded, to recommend to the City Council rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 for the 5th Addition based on the March 23, 1978 staff report with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation on 2 park locations. Motion carried 4:2 (Sundstrom & Levitt voted nay) Motion 4: Redpath moved, Lynch seconded, to recommend approval of the 5th Addition preliminary plat 4-4-78 based upon the staff report of March 23, 1978 with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation on the 2 park locations. Motion carried 4:2 ( Sundstrom & Levitt voted nay) Motion 5: Lynch moved, Bearman seconded, to reopen the public hearing on Prairie East 4th R 6th Additions. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 6: Lynch moved, Bearman seconded, to refer the 4th & 6th Additions back to the developer to redesign and continue the public hearing to April 24, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. R61 n c,,cr 7th Rlh R qth Additions, request by Hustad Development for / ::inute s - Far::a, Recreation sand Unapproved l:eturnl ::esourccs .;.,..,:.iasion - 6 - :Monday, April 3, 1978 a. C rValue (Cont'd) Yrucll felt that the nobler ray be because: of recent Staff change-overs, and a o:e to on-r;oise list of projects and lack of r..ectin s. °.Ui.L CALL VO':i: The notion carried 4-3. R.•+ndcrson - "aye" iongcn - "nay" hruell - "aye" Johnson - "nay" Gsrcns - "aye" D.Anderson - "ray" 'rificld - "rye" LOT1C::: G:arena raved to hold a special nccting to have Super Value indicate where the trail aril] co and to sneak to otl er points requested by kruell. Vatican died for the lack cf a second. rGTTt1: Tnnr-t n roved that re reco=crend to the Council that in any proroasl by Sus.er Valet, de.dice.tion of land for a trail case:rent along Co. Rd. 'O be included in the rc-;orin- azrec:.cnt. D. Anderson secon cd, ration carried with l:rucll catin:; the dissenti::; vote. b. Fr.^iric=t A, ? 6, 7,°L on0,_2 1r. Richard Putnam, Nustad Development Corporation, spoke briefly to the • three Prairie i:aat i,dditions ar eac:y epy,roved and under construction, and to the rss;ainin' Lriiti.ena. he spa :;:e further to their proposal. of two mini park Slid- of 4.3 acres l.ecatcd in tho 7th Addition and 4 acres _?jacent to the. proposed 4th and 5th Additions to be dedicated to the City, end to be traced and .^,eci.ed .•, ia'stad Development Corp.. he added that they have met wit% the resi:cr.ts, and this is what they went. Conalenti-nz on the Staff recce.:acncati.ou of one ei••ht tc ten acre park site, human erm]. fined that they t.•ou].d lose twenty-five units, rrci:i.n,o it econcmically unfeasible for t a c. Lambert scokc to the Staff recon::..andation of one site,- er}-lrinin^ that it would be unreasonable to expect the City to maintain ::.any mini p;rks through- out the City because of the types of rach_rcry we now have and the a!rot:nt of tine that would have to he spent en the road cetting to these sites. he felt they should be owned and maintained by homeowners associations. • hruell vas in favor of five acre parks because they t:ould he large enough to maintain and they would have exposure to more people. Tan;,cn inquired whether these two mini parks would take the pressure off present park ra•:ec and allow a lar,;cr park site to be :roved further south. 1anbrrt answered af"ir: tive. D. An'craon co:'Lentrd on the cost of a larger park site in the northeast quadrant in comparison to the southern site, and felt if we did not have to purchase n l::rTcr site at this tine end the mini parks would be sufficient, the City should sccurc the option and pay.for it throufh the eneh inrk fee payments Ps SUCLC atcd. C•u•ens ].eft at 11.:20 II:. 7jj,9- rinutea - Parka, Recreation Unapproved and ::oturol a,sources Co:c•,.isaion - 7 - Ibnday, April 3, 1973 • b. Prr.irie'_•_ t 7. 8; nndd (contrd) I•:OTICh:: Tan:en moved to re-co:Inc:1i to the Council that the'I'.ustad proposal for ;rnirie i:^st L, 5, 6, 7, 3, and 9 be accepted with the two mini park properties developed as proposer:, :ni cash lark, fee be assessed. Johnson seconded. i)1 3;h;SIG:; 1). ir: c_•son ,eked :'hat the tine fra::x was for a decision on the parkland to • the Scutt: of Ca. :ie. 1. ruts;a:n responded that it vas to i:ustad'o advantage, • as well as to the City's, to agree on this and that they would be receptivE to signing an option as recoracnced, VOTE: Lotion carried unanimously. I•O IC:i: l:ruell roved to direct the Staff to bring the south park site in . the Prairie :Oast area back to the Co,amiosion by June 1st for review. D. Anderson seconded, motion carried unanimously. 1:OT!Ic: hrucll novcd to continue the balance of the Agenda to regularly sce nlad meting or next special meeting. Tnngen seconded, motion carried unnnizcualy. c. I:i.l]a''aro ;. 1st and 2nd Addition Continued. d. avcn i.;fie • Continued. e. The_rnnt Cn11: • Continual, 5, _c c eat on Tca..nin Courts with School District Deleted. 6, Status of 17r1: Corntruaticn far 1978 Continued. 7. cant. -urt. Pro:oaa]. for ?ivin>, 31oud Deleted. D. Cosh :1o'_i!_ert/;AA7.1 P.1"1K r.F Continued. o, I',rsn r:' tale Sir'rl Continued. VI. VII. Continued. VIII, k'.).tC1'3'1a;J_P • r.oved to adjourn at 11:35 TX, seconded by Johnson. I•:ot.car. unanimously.): ;lesreetful]y :submitted by Donna 3tan].cy, ilocording Secretary 3 approved Planning Commission -2- March 27, 1978 Motion 3: Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Copncil approval of the preliminary plat of Raven Ridge dated Jan. 1978 for 24 townhouse and 22 single family lots based upon the staff report of 3/16/78 and the engineer's recommenda- tions of 3/17/78. Motion carried 6:1Sundstrom voted nay due to the density in R1-13.5 District. B. Prairie East 4th,5th & 6th_Additions, request by Hustad Development for rezoning of approximately 70 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 and preliminary plat approval for approximately 200 units of single family and quadraminiums. The additicns are located in the NW and NE corners of Co.Rd.1 and Franio Road. A continued public hearing. Mr. Putnam, Hustad Development Corporation, presented slides and discussed Hustad's and other related investors 81uff Country 1,000+ acre area. He stated the first three additions of Prairie East have homes constructed in excess of $60,000, and the need exists for additional lots. He reviewed the additions locations, density, Guide Plan designation, previous approved and unapproved concepts, present requests, park sites, setbacks requested, approximate lot sizes, and transportation systems. Mr. Putnam objected to the staff's recommending Hustads supply parkland, improve- ments to parks, plus full cash in lieu of land payment. Mr. Putnam believed piping and improvement of swales would correct the drainage problems the existing single family homes are experiencing. Putnam stated the setbacks are mandatory in some of the additions to accommodate the homes that the builders build. He felt reduction in the number of lots to meet lot size and setback standards would.increase the cost of the lots $1,0D0-2,000. Redpath believed if the proponent is not willing to create a 8-10 acre usable park site, then his recommendation last week on the neighborhood park site may be reconsidered. The Planner stated the Planning and Recreation Departments'staff is concerned that the proposed 700-900 units north of Co. Rd. 1,on small lots,would leave very little area for recreation except for the storm pond areas which are not totally usable. He believed usable park land does not include; storm ponds, wooded areas, steep slopes, etc., but instead some relatively flat land that can economically be developed for field uses. Redpath did not feel Hustad's have an overall PUD like Edenvale and The Preserve, yet they are expecting PHD criteria be applied without sufficient tradeoffs. Bearman inquired how many people may live in the Prairie East Additions 1-9 . The Planner roughly estimated 2,400 . Bearman then asked what type and size of recreational area the City foresees as a 'rule of thumb ' to achieve a good neighborhood/park/open space set-up. The Planner responded a neighborhood park, 20-25 acres in size, serving a 1,-1 mile radius accommodates approximately • 4,0D0-5,000 people. • McCulloch did not believe Hustad's park commitments outlined in Res. 762 have been met. approved Planning Commission Minutes -5- March 13, 1978 • V. PETITIONS AND RE000STS: ------------------- A. Prairie East 4th , 5th $ Gth Additions, request by llustad Development for rezoning of approximately 70 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and RH 6.5 and preliminary plat approval for approximately 200 units of single family and quadraminiums. The additions arc located in the NE and NW corners of Co.Rd.1 and Franlo Road. A continued public hearing. B. Prairie East 7th,8th $ 9th Additions, request by llustad Development for rezoning of approximately 50 acres from Rural to ILM 6.5 and preliminary plat approval of app.ruximately 200 units. The additions are located cast and west • of Linden Drive, West of Co. Rd. 18. A continued public hearing. The Planner stated the City staff has concerns to resolve prior to writting staff reports on the additions. Ile asked the Commission their feelings on locating the neighborhood park site in the NE or SE corner of Franlo Road and Co.Rd. 1. He informed the Conmriasion the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resoucres Commission has recommended the NE park site which is the site of the proposed 5th Addition of • Prairie East. He then referred the Commission to the memo dated March 3-17-78 from the Community Services Director regarding park sites and costs. Redpath felt since sewer and water exists for the north site, that it should be developed as lots to help pay for such utilities, therefore the SE site where ( utilities do not exist would he more logical for a park site. Bearman inquired since immediate park users of a south park location would have to cross Co. Rd. 1, would an overpass for pedestrians he feasible. The Planner believed an overpass would be feasible but was unsure if it would be possible to fond such ut time of park construction. The Planning Commission disrris..ed the immediate availability of sewer on certain si? vs. omen land not vet pl;:rnrcd for sewer. approved Planning Commission Minutes -6- March 13, 1978 McCulloch inquired why the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended the NE. site. The Planner responded because it is a more appealing • site, location.,and cost of grading. Mr. Bob lambert stated the NE site is expected • to be easier to develop, closer to users , and more centrally located. Motion Redpath moved, McCulloch seconded, to recommend the southeast park site for the neighborhood park with redesigning of Franlo Rot.d and instruct the staff to negotiate with llustads on costs, development, etc. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Putnam, liastads, stated due to the late hour and no staff report, he would postpone his slide presentation of the projects until the following meeting. Motion Lyaeh moved, Beaman seconded, to continue the Prairie East 4th,5th,6th,7th,8th and 9th Additions public hearings to the March 27, 1978 meeting for staff reports. Motion carried unanimously. Yf;' approved Planning Commission Minutes -5- Feb. 27, 1978 B. Prairie East 4th,5th & 6th Additions, request by Hustad Development for rezoning of approximately 70 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 and preliminary plat approval for approximately 200 units of single family and quadraminiums. The additions are located in the NE and NW corners of Co. Rd. 1 and Franlo Road. A public hearing. C. Prairie East 7th,8th & 9th Additions, request by Hustad Development for rezoning of approximately 50 acres from Rural to RM 6.5 and preliminary plat approval of approximately 200 units. The additions are located east of Linden Drive and West of Co. Rd. 18. A public hearing. B & C considered together. Dick Putnam, Hustad's, suggested since only 3 commission members remain, and a newly appointed member would begin March 13th, he would postpone the slide presentation and give a general outline of the projects tonight. He informed the commission Hustads met with the neighborhood residents last Friday, He summarized the 4th-6th Additions as follows: 4th Addition, single family detached, 2.4 units/acre; 5th Addition, 100 quadraminiums, 25 units, built by Orrin-Thanpson, 5.8 units/acre, approximate sale price$43,OOO ; 6th Addition, single family detached, 52 lots, 2.48 units/acre, sale price approximately$5O,OOO - $80,000. Sundstrom asked what the overalldensity of Additions 4-6 would be. Mr. Putnam did not have the exact figure. The Planner estimated 3 units/ acre and Mr. Putnam agreed. Jerry Mazzara, Windsor Development,summarized the 7th,8th & 9th Additions • as follows: 7th Addition, 56 townhouses, 1000-1600 square feet / unit, split entry and walkout design, 4.3 acre park site; 8th Addition , quadraminium units , 900-1300 square foot units, sale price $46,000-55,000 ; 9th Addition, 88 quadraminium units, 2 acre park site. Sundstrom asked if the units in Prairie East 1st, 2nd & 3rd Additions are completed. Putnam replied not all units are sold in the 3rd Addition, but the 1st and 2nd are nearly sold out. Sundstrom inquired as to the status of Co. Rd. 18's upgrading. Putnam replied the County has informed him the road will be four-lane with interchange improve- ments at Co. Rd. 1 in the near future. The Planner added the County is presently requiring 60 foot right-of-way from centerline for Co. Rd. 18. Sundstrom asked if the townhouse and quadraminium units would be owner occupied. Mazzara replied affirmative. Bob Vurland,1O186 Laur21 Drive, inquired how and when the parkland purposed would be developed, and if trails would connect the additions and parkland. Putnam replied the 2 mini-parks would be graded and seeded and the developer anticipates having the models ready for the August Parade of Homes. approved Planning Coninission Minutes -6- Feb. 27, 1978 Susan Short, 10101 Laurel Drive, expressed concern that drainage from the 7th Addition would add additional water flow to that presently 'occuring across her and neighbor's backyards. Steve Jacobs, 9645 Squire Lane, stated his opposition to multiple family • in the 5th,7th, Eth & 9th Additions. • Ken Franz, 9880 Squire Lane, objected to the park proposed south of Co. Rd. 1 as young children would not be able to cross the road to utilize the park. He also expressed concern over traffic increases, and the developer's previous removal of trees other than elms from Prairie East Additions. Mr. Kurland expressed disapproval of Hustad's present maintenance of outlots. David Brandager, 9660 Lord Court, asked what previous approvals exist on the 7th Addition. The Planner replied a combination of townhouse and apartment units. Motion: • Lynch moved, McCulloch seconded, to continue the public hearings on Prairie East 4th,5th,6th, 7th,8th and 9th Additions to the March 13th meeting for staff report(s). Motion carried unanimously. D. Raven Ridge, Edenvale Inc., request for rezoning and platting of approximately 14 acres for 22 single family and 24 townhouses. The site is located on Outlot V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, East of Hipp's Cedar Point Townhouses. A public hearing. • Mr. Peterson, Edenvale Inc. , informed the Commission the site was originally planned for townhouses, but the present request is for 22 single family lots and 26 townhouse units. He stated the smallest single family lot is 11,7D0 square feet with a less than 2 unit/acre density . Sundstrom asked how long of a cul-de-sac is depicted. Peterson estimated the length to be 500 feet. Roger Miller, 7036 Springhill Circle, stated after he received notification of the public hearing he contacted Mr. Peterson and reviewed the plat. He believed the request would be a good use of the site. John Iverson, 15101 Summerhill Drive, asked how many feet would exist between proposed lots and the nearest lot in the 7th Addition. Peterson estimated 150 feet. Iverson then asked how much the lots would sell for and the expected price of lot and single family home. Peterson estimated the single family lots would sell • for $20,000 ; and lot plus home prices would be $80,000-130,000. mr. Paulson, 7059 Woodland , inquired how much the townhouses are expected to sell for. Peterson estimated $45,000-65,000. • Mr. Hotch, 6937 Edenvale Blvd. , inquired how many feet would exist between the proposed townnouses and Cedar Point Townhouses. Peterson estimated 65 feet. Hotch then suggested the plan be revised down to 5 townhouse units instead of 6. • MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Planning Director DATE: March 23, 1978 REQUEST: PRAIRIE EAST 4TH ADDITION -PUD Amendment from townhouse to single family -Preliminary plat approval of 74 single family lots on 30.6 acres, density 2.4u/acre. -Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with lot size, density, and side yard setback variances REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 4TH ADDITION DATED Feb. 14, 1978 BACKGROUND: The 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan shows this area as single family residential. Ordioance 135 has a sir:le family minimum lot size of 13,500 square feet with a maximum density of 2 units/acre. Setbacks for R1-13.5 District: front 30 feet rear 20 feet side 15-10 feet minimum width of lot 90 feet minimum depth of lot 100 feet Definitions from Ord. 135: Lot Line- the lines bounding a lot as defined herein. When a lot abuts on a street, avenue, park or other public property such line shall be known as a street line. Corner lot- A lot situated at the junction of and fronting on two or more streets. • Yard-front- A yard extending across the front of the lot between the inner side yard lines and lying between the front street line of that lot and the nearest building. • • Memo-Prairie East 4th -2- March 23, 1978 Ordinance 93(Platting Ordinance) speaks to corner lot dimensions in Section 10, "Minimum Subdivision desjgn standards subdivision 17:Lots item(4): corner lots shall be platted at least 15 feet wider than theminimum width required by the zoning ordinance." (Ord. 135 requires 90 ' minimum width) Prairie East 4th Addition proposal Original Prairie East Planned Unit Development included the northern half of Prairie East 4th. In the PUO , Figure 1 (page 2b ), townhouses were shown clustered in Area 2 while Area 6 was shown at 10-15 units/acre. However, included is a copy of the resolution which gives the actual conditions of approval. The PUO as submitted was not approved, see Figure 2 ( page 2c ). PUO VARIANCES: Prairie fast 4th Addition requires rJD a'proval for the lots lying • south of the pending area in order to allow density, lot size and setback variances. The plan proposed shows 74 lots on 30.6 acres for an overall density of 2.42 units/acre. Minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet. Side yard setbacks of 5 foot garage, 10 foot living space, and 15 feet two story living space are being requested. Housing in the $60,000-100,000 price range is proposed on these lots. This is similar in cost to the housing in other areas of town on 13,500 and larger lots without side yard setback variances. Front yard setbacks along 8uckingham Orive, have been suggested by the City Engineering Department to be 35 feet because of the amount of traffic anticipated for this road. The Prairie East 4th plan shows a numberof lots with less than 90 foot frontage. All corner lots should be platted anrinimum of 105 feet in width so front yard setbacks do not conflict. At least 6 of the corner lots shown have one front yard which conflicts with the adjacent yard by allowing the unit to sit between 10 and 15 feet out into the requried front yard setback. As houses are built this condition gives little assurance to neighbors that the unit next door will not jut-out in front. Pig _a.6_ ' et. au AiUIfOO t � 0N ^ a _. . Jf. 1 ..... F--r�r 1 ¢UZUO-- I_ i <<=.<1--- I E i 1 , .;,. • i ( t 1 f i • _ '- < +t a ` 1 l .A.--.-- ` Si-- •L .0>- , 'i.',f '" .-om :..' • ; i ' ' . -I- --:"-•-.17-.. : '. :"• _ . ' ' *I i'. ...,l'iy:,%,:41.0' ./ - L _ .... _ L-' ---'- .-.1;; • '•:, 'I! I .1.... ••:-..-. ;.1/ . ••••.„..--.:...., -; ••_•7"....."7:,...i "--::"....;....-7"...7..--'....17.-, ., i `' 'L ,- ,`.: . .) 4%7 .. `< F.. • +• ' S "�1 t V, • : i • '. RESOLUTION NO 7A7 -2c- RESOLUTION APPRCVN G THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, "PiRAitlE EAST" BY HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION • • BE IT RESOLVED: • That, approval be given Hustad Development Corporation for Planned Unit Development Concept Plan on approximately 95 acaes of land bounded . by Co. Rd. 18 on the cast, proposed 98th Street/Co. Rd. 1 on the south. Pranlo Road on the west, and The Preserve property on the north, for a mixed residential development, and . That approval be given based upon the August 1, 1973, Staff Planning Report with the follcwing recommendations: • 1. Recommend approval of the concept plan for the Prairie East project without indicating specific numbers related to units, but rather identifying the residential character by unit type and general density ranges. 2. Concur vsitii the Prairie East proposal in that Areas S and 6 in the • P.U.D.be designated as residential areas but that the housing type • and density not be determined until critical road decisions are made. 3. Recommend that Area 6 be developed more closely akin with Area 2 in the low to mid-density ranges rather than the medium to high (pg. 5). 4. Recommend the dedication to the Village for any additional right of way necessary for Frank)Road and Co. Rd. l's eedension, if necessary, to provide high quality access to this site. 5. Recommend the redesign of the large 5-8 acre open space in Area 3 . to be used in part as an open field site (pg. 6). 6. Provision for a public trailway access north and south through the • Prairie East site to coanect the Anderson Lakes area with the insti- tutional center proposed south of Co. Rd. 1.Would suggest the development and maintenance cf the tre'lway by the home association with the guarantee of public walkway use (Fq.7). 7. Recommend that the Pail. cert Recreation Commission more closely examine the mechanism for development, ownership, and maintenance • of the neighborhood park and iraiiway systems with the Prairie East project. 8. Recommend the establishment cf an overall Prairie Eest Home Association • charged with the maintenance of co:nmon grounds and as a mechanism for neighborhood organization and input into The Preserve Sector area. 9. Recommend that the !lusted Develop-ant Corporation seriously investigate the provision of low and moderate price range housing within the Prairie East project or within close proximity. 10. Recommend the serious consideration by the developer of the suggested site plan revisions for the townhouse area. If the changes suggested are not Justified, valid reasons should be submitted by the developer to the Village. 11. Withhold rezoning end prclin ir. ry plat as•r.rovat fur the townhouse phase of 76 units for the reason mentioned in the Steii Report (pages 9-11). 12. Recommend rezoning to R1-13.5 for the single family area within Prairie East project (pages 11-13). 13. Recommend pteli:unary plat approval consistent with all recommendations of the Village Engineer for the single family plat in the Prairie East project by Hustad Development Corporation. 14. Suggest th,:t the Posted Development Corporation closely evaluate the • impact of the 13,500 sq.ft. lots on the knoll and woodland character. Strongly tinge the developer to reduce the number of lots, ihereby increasing their size to protect the forest character, that is located ADOPTED by thn Village Council on August 228, 1973. Paul R. Redpatft, Mayo( Memo-Prairie East 4th -3- March 23, 1978 'The most recent plan ( March9, 1978) extends back lot lines into the Central storm water pond to include this area in private ownership. This was done at the suggestion of the City Engineering and Planning ' Staff in order to minimize the City's maintenance responsibilities. This would require that storm sewer utility easements cover the pond so that the City could have access for major drainage corrections. However, with the replotting of these lots, the proponent added a lot which fronts onto Franlo Road. Franlo Road is a collector road, and although there are perhaps 6 or 7 existing homes fronting on Franlo, additional lots should not be allowed. If lot 31, block 2, were allowed its front yard would be adjacent to everone else's back yard. The staff recommends that lot 31,block 2, be eliminated and its area added to surrounding lots. Setbacks from Franlo Road should be 50 feet. 1 /h ' FZE--_/QR/ .. __. / - .1,/,'---,' o` 2 ,4_-I.“.1 m, i o'(/fix %i, '2. <\ 6)1 I /°11: ' ''--47', .. \,''''N a."...1 ,i9, - °,'" ''' i:1 , ''.--...- /Q Z la a'4 r /F-\2 , 5 , `5 r 11: /l. - 22. , - I; , 1.'.,1- ,...1,"v. ..)/ . 1 --N i '-\ TtNGHAM r"{ 1 E 1\: LL4I2710 ;.•,•)-3,2 •- •1�,,11 . Il — :6 - --fi �C'.- I :-AJNG�r�t� `a` . ., ,3 e yrr .,o n 12 t =` —_ - ..1 -_�Y r = - f •k} - ��- �. ; f., , Memo-Prairie East 4th -4- March 23, 1978 SOILS: Although the proponent brochure states . . " that soils in each of Prairie East Additions is considered excellent for urban development", the soils surrounding the center pond area is shown as Marsh. Lots in these areas should be very carefully designed to prevent wet basements and settling foundations. • DRAINAGE lots occurring along the north and east sides of the proposed Nottingham Trail are platted toward the bottom of slopes ranging from 10-20%. This will require careful siting of each home in order to insure proper drainage away from the home. A complete development plan showing minimum floor elevations and drainage must be submitted prior to building permit approval. There have been problems with overland drainage between Prairie East 1st and 2nd because of drainage wales comma uo into back yards near homes rather than being defined clearly along rear lct lines. This situation will have to be remedied between lots 11512, blockl, 4th Addition. Overland drainage must be clearly defined as part of the development plan. Sidwalks loot concrete sidewalk should he installed in the right-of-way of Buckingham Drive. A 5 foot concrete sidewalk should also be installed on the east side of Franlo Road from Laurel Drive south to County Road Number 1. • •�W Memo-Prairie East 4th -5- March 23, 1978 RECREATION Because of the small lots, steep topography , and storm water areas; open space on many of the lots is limited. There is a great need for a usable mini-park area for open game fields. This aspect of the Prairie East submissions is discussed in the 7th, 8th &9th Additions staff report. This area is proposed adjacent to the southeast corner of this site. Cash in lieu of land as outlined in Ordinance 332 must also be assessed against each unit to fulfill the obligation for neighborhood park facilities that may go south of Co. Rd. 1. The figures below illustrate how the developer had envisioned the use of the proposed mini-park. Facilities which should be in the mini- park are 2 open game field areas and space for a possible small parking area and 2 tennis courts. Appropriate area for these facilities should be R-111 acre c of tntal 'Katlic, cnara rfrr L� I rFrolif 5 si t'° t .• .i' • • i 1 I •-y ll 1 r-figios J ,, N H= r j� (4e 1 ,„t.., 1 , ..,_„.,_ rv• r L \tt\\ . 7-- ' • . iFaa.§A . , , . pt~i-1" �r&2i 1 i It ) • , .7„....„7____c.,,N,IN. ,'*..CC-- ::.\'` • .... �•� �r/..,CL--r) i #f•-•rvi I// c% �eY.! / } ,, ...v. ...! .2,:..G.,:, ff 1 f'C.6 ♦(,11 r ii"7 + . 1_``1,• ✓ %i . 'Yl • t • 1'. p • • Memo-Prairie East 4th -6- March 23, 1978 RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission may choose any one of several courses of action regarding this project. A. Approve the PUD, preliminary plat and rezoning as submitted. - B. Approve the PUD for lot size variances and density variance to allow 2.4± units/acre as consistent with original PUD 73, preliminary plat approval, and rezoning to R1-13.5 with following contingencies: 1. No setback variances be granted , corner lots conform to front yard setbacks. 2. A complete development plan defining overland drainage, showing minimum floor elevations and general home location, acceptable • to City Engineering staff be submitted prior to building permit approval. 3. Lot 31, block 2 shall be elminated. • 4. Lots surrounding drainage areas must be improved to allow basement floor elevation a minimum of two feet above 100 year flood eleva- tion as reviewed by the Watershed District. 5. Sidewalks must be constructed by developer 5 feet wide concrete. according to City Engineering standards in approved locations within the ROW on the north side of Buckinham Drive and the East side of Frnalo Road(from Laurel Lane to the south line of the 4th Addition). 6. An area of land be dedicated to the City as shown in Fig. 3 for mini-park field game purposes. 7. Cash in lieu of land be paid of $275/house to fulfill the neighborhood park obligation. 8. Storm sewer utility easements be granted to the City for access to,and storm sewer maintenance of storm water ponding areas. 9. The grading and strom sewer plans must be approved by the Riley/ Purgatory Creek Watershed District, including proper sedimentation control. C. Recommend denial of the PUD request, preliminary platting and rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5. The Manning staff would recommend alternate B. CE:jj MEMO • TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Planning Director DATE: March 23, 1978 PROJECT: Prairie East 5th Addition PROPONENT: Hustad Development Corporation REQUEST: PUD approval Preliminary plat approval for 100 quadraminiums on 17.3 acres, and Rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 BACKGROUND This project is outside of the original PUD. It is shown on the 1968 Guide Plan as low density single family residential . The site has been considered as a neighborhood park site. The development brochure states that these units will market in the $45,000-50,000 range. This will helu to provide housing fur the middle income family. Hennepin County has informed both Hustad's and the City that the access onto Co. Rd. 1 proposed does not have adequate site distance and will not be allowed. This and the requirement for additional usable open space to the north and east sides of this site could significantly change the site plai proposed. The RM 6.5 Zoning category requested permits attached housing and allows a density of up to 6.7 units/acre. • SURROUNDING LAND USES The proposed single family addition to the north ( Prairie East 4th ), borders this project with 125 foot deep lots. The quadraminiums are 40-50 feet from the lot lines to the west and 70-100 feet from the lot lines to the east. A landscape plan showing grade separation and buffer planting must be submitted for review by the staff prior to buildigg permit issuance. Screening and landscaping are requirdd in the RM 6.5 District. The Ted Finholt homestead lies to the east of this parcel approximately 200 feet from the lot line. • Memo-Prairie EAst 5th -2- March 23, 1978 SETBACKS Setbacks to Franlo Road and County Road 1 should be 50 feet. The internal roads will he public streets with private driveways accessing off of them. The setbacks from these streets are 30 feet and are followed in all cases. HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION The plan shows platting of individual lots for the units measuring 29feet x 59feet per unit or 50feet x 118feet per quadraminium. We assume that all land being outside of these lots is owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. FRANLO ROAD Frank, Road must be upgraded along this development as part of the 6th Addition and 5th Addition. SIDEWALKS A concrete sidewalk 5 feet in width shall be built by the developer in the Franlo Road ROW on the east side along the entire length of the project according to City Engineer specifications. UNIT ORIENTATION The units-line up in a very efficient manner. The 'siting' of units "in their own natural clusters" as referred to in the literature is difficult to visualize when looking at this plan however. The unit occurring in the southwest corner of the site has its driveway access directly at the corner of Franlo Road and Co. Rd. 1. This can not be allowed. Driveways should not be allowed within 100 feet of this intersection. • f�� Memo-Prairie East 5th -3- March 23, 1978 RECREATION The mini-park space suggested for the 4th,5th,6th,7th,8th & 9th Additions must be comnitted to prior to approval. The $200/unit cash in lieu of land must be paid to fulfill the developer's obliga- tion for neighborhood park. GRADING All grading and storm sewer plans must be approved by the City Engineering Department and the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District prior to construction. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission may choose any of the following alternatives: 1. Approve the PUD, preliminary plat and rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 as submitted. • 2. Approve the PUD, preliminary plat and rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 with the conditions outlined in the staff report dated March 23, 1978 . 3. Deny or continue the requests. The Planning Staff would recommend alternate #2. CE:jj U MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Planning Director DATE: March 23, 1978 PROJECT: Prairie East 6th Addition PROPONENT: Hustad Development Corporation REQUEST : PUD Approval Preliminary plat approval for 52 lots on 20.9i acres, and Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with density, lot size, and setback variances. PROJECT LOCATION The proposal is located in the northwest corner of Franlo Road and Co. Id. '. on the site of the current Uennepin County Leaf Recyc,ir. Center. BACKGROUND: The 1968 Guide Plan depicts this area as low density single family. This area was not part of the original PUD 73-07. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is an open rolling piece with basically two lower areas which have no apparent outfall. Franlo Road on the east side of this project is an unimproved road and development in this area will require improvement by the developer. There is one existing home on the site which fronts on Franlo Road. REQUEST: • The PUD request is for a density of approximately 2.48 units/acre. The brochure states that the homes will start in the S50,000 to $60,000 price range. Average lot size is approximately 13,000 square feet with a minimum lot size of 9,375 square feet. Memo-Prairie East 6th -2- March 23, 1978 SETBACKS Corner lots should be platted to conform with two front yard setback. Four additional lots are shown fronting onto Franlo Road which is a collector road. If this is to be allowed, setback from Franlo Road, (which has only a 66 foot ROW), should be 50 feet. Setback from Buckingham Drive through the 4th Addition need only be 30 feet. • Setbacks from Co. Rd. 1 should be 50 feet. This is the setback required from collector roads. Side yard setbacks should not be varied from the 10 foot/I5 foot required. • DRAINAGE A complete development plan showing minimum floor elevations shall be submitted prior to building permits. The drainage for the entire site empties ultimately into a luw area which will pond on lots 2,3,6 &7 north of Buckingham Drive. This area apparently has an inlet from sc.Ah of Co. Rd. 1, but no outlet, In addition, runoff from Olympic Hills 4th also drains into this area. A 100 year storm high water line must be determined for this area. Most of lot 6 appears to be in an area which will be inundated. There is a second low area, toward.the center of the project. The storm sewer plan shows drainge from Franlo Road and Raven Drive taken by pipe to this low area along lot 8 and dumped . It is then picked-up out of the backyards by a pipe along lot 2 and taken to the western low area. The staff feels it is undesirable to allow street water to flow across back yards in this manner. The drainage and storm sewer plan must be approved by the City Engineering Department and Riley purgatory creeks Watershed District prior to building permit issuance. RECREATION The cash in lieu of land shall be assessed in order to fulfill the developer's neighborhood park obligation. The developer shall provide adequate usable acreage for a mini-park north of Co. Rd. 1 which will accommodate 2 open field game areas and room for 2 potential tennis courts and limited parking without requiring substantial grading. Memo-Prairie East 6th -3- March 23, 1978 • SIDEWALKS A sidewalk shall be constructed along the west side of Franio Road by the developer, 5 feet in width of concrete to specifications and in location acceptable to the City Engineering Department. Hennepin County Highway Department feels that there is no need for an additional access to Co. Rd. 1 of Buckingham Drive. The proponent has indicated that at sime future time they feel Buckingham Drive will continue south across Co. Rd. 1 to other land holdings. Staff feels that Buckingham should end in a temporary cul-de-sac until firmer plans indicate where a road south would locate. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission may take any of the following actions: 1. Approve the PUD, preliminary plat and rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with variances as requested. 2. Approve the PUD , preliminary plat and rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with lot size, and density variances contingent upon conformance with the items in this staff report. 3. Deny theproject as being inconsistent with City ordinances, • policies, and the existing Comprehensive Guide Plan. The Planning Staff would recommend Alternate #2. • CE:jj • • cfi 91 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ,;{' 320 Washington Av. South A ;) LLJJ Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 HENNEPIN . 1 935-3381 • ,.) March 21, 1978 Mr. Chris Enger, Planning Director • City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: RE: Proposed Plat - "Prairie East Fifth Addition" CSAIi 1 - Northeast quadrant CSAH 1 and Franlo Road Section 25, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 642 Review and Recommendations Thank you for submitting the above referenced plat for our review. ' We reviewed the proposed plat and have the following connnents: 1. The developer should dedicate an additional 17 feet of • right of way for a total of 50 feet from and along the centerline of CSAH 1. • 2. All access from the plat to CSAH 1 must be via existing Franlo Road. We conducted a sight distance check at proposed Spruce Street and at several other locations along the plats CSAH 1 frontage, and in all cases, the sight distance was below our minimum requirement for entering vehicles. 3. The developer must apply for and receive an approved entrance permit before beginning any new access construc- tion. Permit forms are available from our Traffic Div- ision. 4. All proposed construction mum t,uuual ,,y., ', •.-, , requires County approval before beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage construc- • tion, utility construction, trail development, and land- scaping. A utility permit is required for this work. Utility parcut forms are available from our Maintenance Division. 5. The developer must restore any area within County right of way that is disturbed during construction. Please direct any response or questions to Douglas Mattson at this , office. • Sincerely, a lr,C�Pe� • • eP.E. r ranmrin ''Chief, Planning and frog g j JMW/DBM:bg • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 3201Washington Av. South • Hopkins. Minnesota 55343 "k; • HENNEPIN 935 3381 March 21, 1978 ,f r ' Mr. Chris Enger, Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 8950 Fden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: • RE: Proposed Plat - "Prairie East Sixth Addition" CSAH 1 - Northwest quadrant CSAH 1 and Franlo Section 25, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 643 Review and Recommendations Thank you for submitting the above rnferenced plat for our review. We reviewed the proposed plat and have the following comments: 1. The developer should dedicate an additional 17 feet of right way for a total of 50 feet from and along the centerline of CSAH 1. 2. Access from the plat to CSAH 1 should be limited to existing Franlo Road. Lots abutting CSAH 1 must have access to the proposed City streets. individual driveways to CSAH 1 will not be permitted. 3. The developer must apply for and receive an approved entrance permit before beginning any new access construction. Permit forms are available from our Traffic Division. 4. All proposed construction within County right of way requires County approval before beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage construction, utility construc- tion, trail development, and landscaping. A utility permit is required for this work. Utility permit forms are available from our Maintenance Division. 5. The developer must restore any area within County right . of way that is disturbed during construction. • Please direct any response or questions to Douglas Mattson at this office. c'ncerely, 'alf ((416( ,, ames M. Mold, P.F. • Chief, Planning and Programming jl JMW/DRM;bg :73 • March 23, 1978 Community Services Staff Recommendations PRAIRIE EAST 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9th Additions Supplement to March 20, 1978 Planning Staff Report PRAIRIE EAST 4th is 73 single family units on 30.6 acres. PRAIRIE EAST 5th is I00 units on 17.3 acres. PRAIRIE EAST 6th is 52 single family units on 20.9 acres. PRAIRIE EAST 7th is 56 multi family units on 12 acres. PRAIRIE EAST 8th is 80 multi family units on 12 acres. PRAIRIE EAST 9th is 88 multi family units on 14 acres. Total of 449 units. The developer is proposing two mini park sites. A 4.3 acre parcel most of which is lowland holding pond area in the 7th Addition, and a 4 acre parcel adjacent to the proposed 4th and 5th Additions. This 4 acre parcel is also a holding pond area. Refer to Planning Staff Report for location and size of these parcels. At the March 6, 1978 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting, the Commission voted unanimously that the neighborhood park serving this area of the community be located on a northeast quadrant of the intersection of Franlo Road and Co. oad I. The Planning Commission; however, decided that the area south of County Road I would be a more appropriate site due to the difference in :"= cost of the land. Mr. Putnam, from the Hustad Development Co., had submitted a proposed site plan south of County Road 1 that showed the realignment of Franlo Road. This site plan was more feasible than the proposed south site simply because of the road realignment and the terrain. This site plan would; however, require two property owners to agree on the sale of the property for a park site. The property owners being Hustad's and the Reichow's. Another concern on this proposed south site is the cost of realigning the road. After reviewing Prairie East 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9th, the Community Services Staff has the following recommendations: 1. Require 8 to 10 acres for a mini neighborhood park site north of the road. This 8 to 10 acres should be in one site, rather than split as is the present proposal. 2. Obtain an option on a 15-20 acre park site south of the road for the neighborhood school/park site to serve this area of the community. This site would not have to be at the intersection, but could be further south because of the 8-10 acre site just north of the road. 3. Begin to acquire that new park site on a contract for deed basis making payments with the CASH PARK FEE as the CASH PARK FEE comes in. This agreement should also have a cla;mse that would provide for a delay in payments if the number of building permits per year declines. 4. Community Services Staff concurs with the Planning Staff in that the small mini park in the 7th Addition is too small for any game field play and that this area be retained in the homeowners association connected with the townhouses. -t -2- • 5. That the trail from the Preserve's Garrison Forest to Linden Drive should also be maintained and owned by the homeowners association. 6. The CASH PARK FEE of 5275.00 per single family unit and 5200.00 per all other residential uses be assessed to each of the new additions. BL:md • !!1 i t7 A 3/23/78 ENGINEERING STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS PRAIRIE EAST 4TH,_5TH PJD 6TH ADDITIONS Supplement to 3/23/78 Planning Staff Report 1. Plat a 9' radius along property lines at all street intersections and cul-de-sac returns to provide sufficient R/W for utility installations. 2. Grading and storm sewer plans must be approved by the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District. Plans submitted for approval must define the total contributing drainage area at pondinq locations. The developer must work with the developer of Olympic Hills 4th Addition to determine the projected 100 year frequency high water elevation of the pending area at the west property line of the proposed Prairie East 6th Addition. The 100 year frequency high water elevation must be determined for all pending areas within the plats and for the area located south of Prairie • East 4th Addition. 3. The developer shall submit a finalized development plan, prior to final plat approval or building permit issuance, which shall show proposed grading, storm water drainage areas and direction of flow, preliminary utility plans, pondinq and fluodplain high water levels for 100 year stoma «nd minimum floor elevations for all lots. • • 4. Hennepin County Highway Department review is required prior to prelimi- nary plat approval. 5. Some changes are required on the Preliminary utility plans. These changes are noted on the Engineering Department's copy of said plans. 5. The City and developer must determine, prior to preliminary plat ap- proval, which streets and utilities could be owned and maintained by the City in Prairie East 5th Addition. 7. Street grades'shall not exceed 7.5%. 8. Assessment information: The following assessments have been levied: #6452, trunk sewer & water $101,168 #7031, Supplemental trunk sewer & water $37,026 #6446, Franlo Road Improvement $12,400 The following assessment is pending: , Trunk sewer and water $4,047 CJJ:kh MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Franlo Road Park Site DATE: March 17, 1978 The intersection of Franlo Road and Co. Road 1 has been identified as an appropriate area for a neighborhood school/park site to serve residents living approximately within a half mile radius. That area is now under pressure for development; therefore, a decision must be made on the location of the park site. In considering the best location for a park site several factors were taken into consideration. 1. Amount of land available. 2. Amount of grading required on each site. 3. Cost of land. 4. A« rent costs on frontage of public roads. 5. Access by pedestrians. 6. Service area including proximity to the population and distance to existing or proposed active park areas. The northwest site was eliminated early in the process for several reasons, the major reasons being insufficient amount of land (approximately 16 acres) for a school/park site, and the fact that the vast majority of the users would have to cross either Franlo Road or Co. Road 1 to get to the site. That left the northeast quadrant for a "north site" and either the southwest or southeast quardrants, or a combination of both, for a "south site". Franlo Road could be swung either east or west to the south of Co. Road 1 so the south site area can be moved around quite a bit. The easiest way to determine the best site is to compare both sites with the facts available. 1. Amount of land available. We have determined that. 22-25 acres is needed to develop a neighborhood school/park site. The north site has 20 acres available if we allow single family homes to be built along Buckingham Drive all the way to Franlo Road and we acquire a small strip of land from the Firrholt's. We would have about 23 acres of land if we carried the park to Buckinohwn Drive. (We would also have additional assessment costs). The amount of land on the south site is not as limited as there is no development at this time. C.�C -1- 2. Amount of grading required on each site. "Rough grading estimates have been developed according to an acceptable site layout of the various facilities. The north site has considerably less grading, although the staff feels that both facility layout schemes are comparable in terms of potential use". The south site area could be moved east or west with some decreased costs of grading if the site is moved west. The south site could be moved further south for better grading but it would be further away from the users. NORTH SITE - Approximately 30,000 cubic yards SOUTH SITE - Approximately 70,000 cubic yards 3. Appraisals were completed on all four quadrants by Chase-Brackett Co. on November 4, 1977. SITE PARCEL OWNER ACRES *NORTHEAST #7 6420 Wallace Hustad 29.57 Appraised Market Value $7,700 per acre Owner's estimated value $15,000-$22,000 per acre NORTHWEST #9 4020 Wallace Hustad 15.76 Appraised Market Value $6,700 per acre *SOUTHWEST SITE #8 6810 Sam Mayo 5.37 Apparaised Market Value $8,100 per acre #8 6820 Wallace Hustad 15.76 Appraised Market Value $7,400 per acre Owner's estimated value $10,000 per acre SOUTHWEST #10 2150 Wallace Hustad 67.3 Appraised Market Value $6,400 per acre Owner's estimated value $10,000 per acre 4. Assessment costs on frontEige of public roads. The north site would probably have about 1500' of combined frontage on Franlo Road and Co. Road 1. The south site would have about 1400' if the road kept the same alignment. However, the alignment could be changed to more or less frontage. 5. Access by pedestrians Whether the site goes north or south approximately half of the users will have to cross Co. Road 5 a minor arterial. The site should be determined prior to approving any development proposals to insure adequate sidewalks and/or trails to the site from the various neighborhoods surrounding the site. • *Preliminary site plans completed for rough grading purposes. (copy attached) f; 1 ! -2 6. Service area includinj_proximity_to the population and distance to existing and proposed active park areas. The Park Planner's report of March 3, 1978 indicated that there will ultimately be 850 units north of Co. Road 1 and 1200 units south of the road. After reviewing those breakdowns, we found an error. Figuring the number of units in the approved PUD and proposed developments, and figuring 3 units per acre in the remaining open space we have arrived at the following totals: South of Co. Road 1 Bluffs East 672 units Open Space 90 acres @ 3 units per acre=270 units TOTAL 942 North of Co. Road 1 Number of units Amsden Hills 51 Garrison Forest 50 Prairie East 61 Prairie East 2 53 Prairie East 3 85 Prairie East 4 73 *Prairie East 5 100 Prairie East 6 54 • Prairie East 7 56 Prairie East 8 80 Prairie East 9 88 Olymic Hills 4 & 5 40 Olymic Hills 1 22 Olymic Hills 2 49 Olymic Hills 3 35 Bonner/Waters 7 Vacant 20 acres @ 3 units/acre = 60 964 *100 units would be deleted if Prairie East 5 became a park. The nearest active park area to the north is Preserve Park, nearly two miles to the north of the instersection of Franlo Road and Co. Road 1. The nearest active use south of the site will he the proposed Homeward Hills neighborhood park on the west side of Purgatory Creek, about one mile west of the instersection. There is a proposed pedestrian bridge across the creek in that area would provide access for use by residents living east of the creek. It is quite apparent that the sites are equal in many areas. The major differences • being the north site is more centrally located, distance wise, and is a better site to work with considering grading. `1117' -3- RECOMMENDATIONS The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission voted unanimously to recommend purchase of the north site for a neighborhood school/park site, at their March 6, 1978 meeting. Staff also recommends the north site; however, if the Council prefers the south site the staff has the following recommendations: 1. Allow staff to prepare a suitable site plan for the south site - probably realigning Franlo Road. 2. Have the developer agree to assume the costs of realigning the road. 3. Obtain an option that is agreeable to the City on the south site prior to approving the zoning agreement. 4. Have developer agree to pay the difference in the cost of site preparation. 5. Have the developer provide a 8-10 acre mini park north of the road to serve the younger children that will not be able to safely cross Co. Road 1 alone. If the Council approves the north site, an option agreeable to the City should be obtained prior to approving the zoning agreement. B{.:md • pf ; •.. „... ---................ t . ' 1 - • '..--.%-‘.. .1. -..-'. ... ? ... • 1 . . a., I , .. • I , • I 8o,000 sq.VT. , FooT BALL; ' • f•-• 1 `, .,G.Hook i ' SOCC i E.-FL. ' ' 1 P •. . . . $ i . , • . 11,,, .\ , . ' ' \ ,.. I . i •- 1 , 1 N,\`1 •'f'. • ''t7"---4:..........____----•" r i 1••• '--, • • . , — TENN IS _ ,___-----A • . • .._ 1 / .. . • . . ..! 1 ,/ . _,..., ,., . t t , 0 \\\\\ .\ . .1,, ,\ so,TB,LL . H N\\ \\• \\ \ ' 1 / • ' • \_.>": i i Y 1' 1 . . .. ,• 1 . I . I• „,. . , i , /, • ;, 1 , -:.,,...•:‘., `-- ((.. -- > ‘ • . -----... -,.••••„,.. ---_____•- .-- \ •,.\ \ ' • 71.Crii4C c 1 iff .•:; • % \ •,• \ • rion-1 4i1L.-'. •. N \ ; • N N. • SCT113A LL s . ••• . ' \.... ••••..,..., . • . • •••,,,\ Ill. I s . • \.. . • if , \ • • . „,••:;; .7--.:..-1›:;•;,..1 i ' • . 'N ' '', ..';%': '. • • \ <, AC' . `� ,� \\. \• ". ...---('44( :/‘.,."-1 Itt. : • \� \ \ems,. / 1 \ •", i ' _ . . \. \�;` /• '�� i •gyp• 1\T •• -- -- Tn� '/6 1-1 Air— ' r • ter — �� . _ q.: • ./ �r`1 - 7 _---'J 1 ' H H • • • • • MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Unapproved Monday, April 10, 1978 7:30 PM, City Hall COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sundstrom Retterath, Redpath, Lynch, Bearman, ------ Levitt • COMMISSION ABSENT: McCulloch STAffPRESENT: Chris Enger Planning Director, Jean Johnson Planning Assistant B. Prairie East 7th,8th & 9th Additions, request by Hustad Development for rezoning of approximately 50 acres from Rural to RM 6.5 , and preliminary plat approval of approximately 200 units. The additions are located east and west of Linden Dirve, West of Co.Rd. 1B, a continued public hearing. The Planner stated these additions have not been revised since the last meeting, but agreements understood are: the loop streets will be private, setbacks variances from the streets are suggested if no units front onto the road(sethacks would in.no rases be less t ban.30 feet from hack of curb, and 50 foot setback from reouested Co.Rd. 18 Bow is neonosed. Redpath asked if the townhouse association would have any park maintenance. Mr. Woodland , Windsor, stated they do not wish to hear the liability of the park . Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes -4- April 10, 1978 Mr. Moore,10081 Laurel Drive, supported the park plan proposed by the developers. Levitt asked if the proponent will meet the requirements of turn lanes, etc., of Hennepin County Highway Department. Mr. Putnam stated they will do what is required. Redpath expressed concern that the sight distance of the entrance road and Co. Rd. 18 is bad. Sundstrom expressed concern that the open space/pond/recreation area proposed is inadequate for the densities proposed. Bearman expressed concern that the park area proposed is inadequate and carries liability and maintenance problems. Redpath asked if the trail behind the 7th Addition, goting to Preserve, would be maintained by the townhouse association. The Planner replied if it is . accepted as public open space, it would be City responsibility, but he is unsure how the City would maintain it. Redpath expressed concern action on these additions and corresponding densities without adequate park or open space commitments. Levitt did not believe the proponent is proposing sufficient tradeoffs for the densities requested. • Lynch expressed concern about the variances requested. Motion 1: Redpath moved, ^eannan seconded, to close 1"e public hearing on the 7t1„8th and 9th Additions. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 2: Redpath moved, Bearman seconded, to recommend to the City Council reaffirmation of the multiple concept use on the 7th,8th & 9th Additions. Motion carried 5:1 with Levitt voting nay. Motion 3: Redpath moved, Bearman seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 based on the March 20, 1978 staff report, the March 27,1978 letter from Hennepin County, and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation on park/open space. Motion failed 1:5 with Redpath voting aye. Motion 4: Levitt moved, Bearman seconded, to recommend to the City Council denial of Prairie East 7th,8th & 9th Additions based upon the following: 1. inadequate open space for immediate additions, totally inadequate for entire additions, 2. densities requested without adequate tradeoffs, 3. park areas proposed contain too much storm water pond in relation to usable 4. liability problems and maintenance problems associated with area, public ownership of park/pond areas, 5. variances requested without sufficient need exhibited. Motion carried 5:1 with Redpath voting nay. ;:intitea - iarha, ,tocreation and Unappro..-ed Natural lnisources •.;ece.iasion - 6 - Gonda April ), 1978 a. riliper Value ('.lantIC) Frooll reit that the trebles: Liny be bee:luau of recent Staff changc-over , and to on-,:eice, list or p:rojeata and lath of noctirp.:s. ROLL 70".1: The motion caterie 14-3. H.An(leroon - "aye" Tan,:cn - "nay" Erucil - "aye" johason - Garcna - "aye" L.Anderatin - Fificld - "aye" LOTlC Careds moved to held a s',.ecial meetisc to hove duper Valuo indicate t!here the traLl nil] co anO to seenk to oter points requestod by hruell. lotion died far the inch of a second. Tanpen moved that we recommend to the Joureil that in any pratonal by Sc,.or Value, declicb:tion of lend for a trail easement alcm Co. id. fO be inelt,d.ed in cc re,:lonineareci.ent. D. Anderson sccon.;c0, notion carried with Pencil caotin:: the diasentin:; vote. b. Prairie haat 7, 1, nnt,2 R.i.ohaz-d i'utnnr, husted 33cvelopment Corporation, apcke briefly to the • three Prairie' 1.ent Additio,is areatly :17rOVCd and uncler construction, and to tha he ar1:e further to their prol..ossj. of t.,ro mini ait.ea ef 4.3 ;:crea 2.ecatee in i Teb AC.Siiion and 4 acres :-dotelt to tho pr •-.:aeo 4Ih and ith Additioea to be dedicated to the City, and to be Frod. neca'es': hy haslad h.evelpt:-ent "lerp.. Pc adr7ad that they hove ri,:t I.- rod and thiti ia that they bant, jon.ientiw; on the Stsff recoi.ocation of one ci:htir ten acre pork site, :Putnam e:mloined CInt they woule lent: tuent -five units, mehin.7 it economically tolfeasible for thsli. Lambert snake to tLc Staff recors:endation of one site, expluinina that it mule be unreasonable to eioaect tic City to maintain meny mini prrka tit-.cut the City beeanre of the types of maeninery we now ye and the ameunt of time that ::euld have to he spent en the read c,eitin.-r, to ticene sites. Pc felt they cSould he owred and maintained by homcbtiners associations. 1-rue].] ycon in favor of five. acre poi-1:s because they icould he lar7.0 enoueli to moint:ja and they nulcl have exposure to mare people. Tawn incuired uLether these to mini parks vould tabs the pressure off prestnt ;ark s7:ca and n)lot., a la ,-or panic site to he moved further suulh. lar..bort an'eAred afir.4atipc. D. Am'crson eu:T•cnted on the cost of a ls.rLcr park site in the northeast onadvant in cloncarie.an to the nuuthcrn alte, and felt if we did not have to purchase a lar, site at this time nand the Isini parks would be sufficient, the 'jlety eacould 41-nor: thi. option and pay.for it throw,d, the 0/11,11 lark fee inn:aunts nec au', Caronn left at 11:2j II:. • I:inutca - Prrl:n, ;tc crration Unai roved and ::aturul ac aourccn Jo;:.i.pion - 7 - Monday, April 3, 1973 b. IPraitie East 1, ), 7. 3, and 9 (cont'd) i•:OT'ICL: ;'an-en moved to reed :lean: to the Council that the Punted pronocal for ir.:i;•ic loot L, 5, 6, 7, 3, and 9 be accepted with the tiro r,ini I:ark properties cc rc]ored as proposed, sod cash rare fee be assessed. Jehncon seconded. D1T1l'1 3I0:: • D. e:cs on :;ked chat the tine franc was for a dcaision on the parkland to the south of tea. id. 1. Putnam responded that it vas to i:ustad'o advantage, no well no to the -Ci ty's, to agree on this and that they would be receptive to signin: an option as rcco encec. VOTE; Lotion carried unanimously. I•:0'iIC i:: Prue]]. r.o vcd to direct the Staff to bring the south park site in the Prairie Last arca back to the Cot:iinsicr. by Juno 1st for review. D. Ancernon seconded, notion carried unanimously.i:OT'Ic:: lirucll t..ovcd to continue the balance of the Agenda to regularly scheduled meotin or tan et sieccial meeting. Tangen roconced, notion carried unsni nsus ly. c. F:i.11 ',�•': l.et and 2cAddition Continued. d. ;,venn . i;`c Continued. e. Pheasant Cahn • Continued. 5. Joint i:'-c A:_--cot on Tennis ..ou-t. with School District Deleted. 6. Status of I:c': Corr _:uton for ]97:3 Continued. • 7. 7Teenn=.• :_t:^; i'raanr.a] for_)._n- iilnud Deleted. Continued. 9. J_,.c? `''_,i.rtS'._bl_r Conti aucd. Vl. :i 711. Continued. I. VIII. r.ovcd to adjourn at 11:35 :;:, accordcd by Johnson. Not.car. unonimoucly. ilea ectful ly sub::;itted by Donna Stanley, 'tecurdinC Secretory 1,C.) approved • Planning Commission -3- March 27, 1978 Redpath felt the developer should supply two 4 acre usable park areas for the additions. Lynch agreed, stating at the previous meeting the neighbors also asked for 'usable' park areas , not storm ponds. Prairie East 7th,8th &9th Additions Mr. Mazzara, Windsor Development,stated they concur with the Engineer's report, but may desire the private road be only 28 feet wide. He did not agree with the County's request for additional setback from Co. Rd. 18, instead it could be bermed and landscaped to provide buffering. He did not feel the project would be economically feasible if additional right-of-way is required and units are lost. Redpath believed the park issue should be resolved prior to commission action. Lynch concurred adding other items than park seem to be unresolved. Mr. Keeler , 10021 Laurel Drive,stated there would be little usable open area around the storm ponds unless they are filled. He preferred 1 larger usable park than two small unusable parks around storm ponds which would better operate as open space between the multiple and single family. John Moore, 10081 Laurel Drive, asked who would develop the storm pond areas and when. Mr. Putnam responded they intend to redesign the pond location and shape , then seed and sod the area. Moore inquired if the developer or city is responsible if the storm ponds cause wet basements. Mr. Sundstrom replied that is not a decision for the Planning Commission to make. Mr. Kurland, 10186 Laurel Drive, stated the pond 'garbage pit' at Franlo and • Laurel Drive still has not been cleaned-up, and hoped the city would not give any more project approvals until the pond is cleaned-up and park commitments are met. Mr. Ted Finholt, 10010 Pioneer Trail, stated the 4.5 acres Hustad may purchase from him was to be used as a ponding area not for active recreational uses as are being discussed tonight. He beliived the ponding area is needed to store water from the many homes that will be built. Susan Short, 10101 Laurel Drive, inquired if all run-off, from the 7th Addition on south, would eventually end-up in the pond by Finholts. The Planner responded affirmative, adding various delays of culverts and other ponds will delay the runoff before it arrives in the southern most holding pond. Mr. Kurland inquired if the residents could attend meetings between the developer and proponent to keep abreastof decisions made. McCulloch responded all information from such meetings would be brought to the public Commission meeting and all decisions are made at the public meeting. Putnam stated he would notify residents of meetings with the staff. Motioh Redpath moved, McCulloch seconded, to continue the Prairie East Additions 4-9 to the April 10th meeting for resolution between the proponent and staff on unresolved items. Motion carried 6:0:1 with Bearman voting nay. Cs v4' approvc d Planning Commission Minutes -5- • March 13, 1978 V. PETITIONS AND REQUESTS: A. Prairie East 4th , Sth E 6th Additions, request by Hustad Development for rezoning of approximately 70 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and 101 6.5 and preliminary plat approval for approximately 200 units of single family and quadraminiums. The additions arc located in the NE and NW corners of Co.Rd.1 and Franlo Road. A continued puhtic hearing. B. Prairie East 7th,Sth S 9th Additions, request by Ilustad Development for rezoning of approximately 50 acres from Rural to P.M 6.5 and preliminary plat - approval of appaoximately 200 units. The additions are located cast and west of Linden Drive, West of Co. Rd. 18. A continued public hearing. • The Planner stated the City staff has concerns to resolve prior to writting staff reports on the additions. He asked the Commission their feelings on locating the neighborhood park site in the NE or SE corner of Franlo Road and Co.Rd. 1. He informed the Commission the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resoucres Commission has recommended the NE park site which is the site of the proposed Sth Addition of Prairie Fast. He then referred the Commission to the memo dated March 3-1/-78 from the Community Services Director regarding park sites and costs. • Redpath felt since sewer and water exists for the north site, that it should be developed as lets to help pay for such utilities, therefore the SE site where utilities do not exist would be more logical for a park site. Bearman inquired since immediate park users of a south park location would have to cross Co. Rd. I, would an overpass for pedestrians be feasible. The Planner believed an overpass would be feasible but was unsure if it would be possible to fond such ut time of park construction. The Planning Commission discuisned the immediate availability of sewer on certain sit- vs. open land not vet p1:maned for sewer. • approved Planning Commission Minutes -6- March 13, 1978 • • McCulloch inquired why the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended the NI; site. The Planner responded because it is a more appealing site, localionnand cost of grading. Mr. soh lambert stated the NE site is expected to be easier to develop, closer to users , and more centrally located. Metinn Redpath moved, McCulloch seconded, to recommend the southeast park site for the neighborhood park with redesin,uineof Franlo Ro::d and instruct the staff to negotiate with ilustads on costs, development, etc. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Putnam, Mustad', stated due to the late hour and no staff report, he would postpone his slide presentation of the projects until the following meeting. Mot ion lynch moved, Fenrman seconded, to continue the Prairie Fast ltin,Sth,6th,7th,Sth and 9th Additions public hearings to the March 27, 1978 meeting for staff reports. Motion c.(rrie! unanimously. 1.a • • approved Planning Commission Minutes -5- Feb. 27, 1978 B. Prairie East 4th,5th & bth Additions, request by Hustad Development for rezoning of approximately 70 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and RN 6.5 and preliminary plat approval for approximately 200 units of single family and quadraminiums. The additions are located in the NE and NW corners of Co. Rd. 1 and Franlo Road. A public hearing. C. Prairie Fast 7th,2th & 9th Additions, request by Ilustad Development for rezoning of approximately 50 acres from Rural to RN 6.5 and preliminary plat approval of approximately 200 units. The additions are located east of Linden Drive and West of Co. Rd. 18. A public hearing. • B & C considered together. Dick Putnam, ilustad's, suggested since only 3 commission members remain, and a newly appointed member would begin parch 13th, he would postpone the slide presentation and give a general outline of the projects tonight. lie informed the commission Hustads met with the neighborhood residents last Friday, He summarized the 4th-6th Additions as follows: 4th Addition, single family detached, 2.4 units/acre; 5th Addition, 100 quadraminiums, 25 units, built by • Orrin-Thompson, 5.8 units/acre, approximate sale price$43,000 ; 6th Addition, single family detached, 52 lots, 2.48 units/acre, sale price approximately$50,000 - $80,000. Sundstrom asked what the overall density of Additions 4-6 would be. Mr. Putnam did not have the exact figure. The Planner estimated 3 units/ acre and Mr. Putnam agreed. Jerry Mazzara, Windsor Development,summarized the 7th,8th & 9th Additions as follows: 7th Addition, 56 townhouses, 1000-1600 square feet / unit, split entry and walkout design, 4.3 acre park site; 8th Addition , quadraminium units , 900-1300 square foot units, sale price $46,000-55,000 ; 9th Addition, 88 quadraminium units, 2 acre park site. Sundstrom asked if the units in Prairie Fast 1st, 2nd & 3rd Additions are completed. Putnam replied not all units are sold in the 3rd Addition, but the 1st and 2nd are nearly sold out. Sundstrom inquired as to the status of Co. Rd. 18's upgrading. Putnam replied the County has informed him the road will be four-lane with interchange improve- ments at Co. Rd. 1 in the near future. The Planner added the County is presently requiring 60 foot right-of-way from centerline for Co. Rd. 18. • Sundstrom asked if the townhouse and quadraminium units would be owner occupied. • Mazzara replied affirmative. • Bob Kurland,10186 Laurel Drive, inquired how and when the parkland purposed would be developed, and if trails would connect the additions and parkland. Putnam replied the 2 mini-parks would he graded and seeded and the developer anticipates having the models ready for the August Parade of Homes. . �.r rLt= approved Planning Commission Minutes -6- Feb. 27, 1978 Susan Short, 10101 Laurel Drive, expressed concern that drainage from the 7th Addition would add additional water flow to that presently occuring across her and neighbor's backyards. Steve Jacobs, 9645 Squire Lane, stated his opposition to multiple family in the 5th,7th, 8th & 9th Additions. • Ken Franz, 9880 Squire Lane, objected to the park proposed south of Co. Rd. 1 as young children would not be able to cross the road to utilize the park. He also expressed concern over traffic increases, and the developer's previous removal of trees other than elms from Prairie East Additions. Mr. Kurland expressed disapproval of Hustad's present maintenance of outlots. David Brandager, 9660 Lord Court, asked what previous approvals exist on the 7th Addition. The Planner replied a combination of townhouse and apartment units. Motion: Lynch moved, McCulloch seconded, to continue the public hearings on Prairie East 4th,5th,6th, 7th,8th and 9th Additions to the March 13th meeting for staff report(s). Motion carried unanimously. D. Raven Ridge, Edenvale Inc., request for rezoning and platting of approximately 14 acres for 22 single family and 24 townhouses. The site is located on Outlot V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, East of Hipp's Cedar Point Townhouses. A public hearing. • Mr. Peterson, Edenvale inc., informed the Commission the site was originally planned for townhouses, but the present request is for 22 single family lots and 26 townhouse units. He stated the smallest single family lot is 11,700 square feet with a less than 2 unit/acre density . Sundstrom asked how long of a cul-de-sac is depicted. Peterson estimated the length to be 500 feet. Roger Miller, 7036 Springhill Circle, stated after he received notification of the public hearing he contacted Mr. Peterson and reviewed the plat. He believed the request would be a good use of the site. John Iverson, 15101 Sum:nerhill Drive, asked how many feet would exist between proposed lots and the nearest lot in the 7th Addition. Peterson estimated 150 feet. Iverson then asked how retch the lots would sell for and the expected price of lot and single family home. Peterson estimated the single family lots would sell for $?0,000 ; and lot plus home prices would be 580,000-130,000. Mr. Paulson, 7059 Woodland inquired how much the townhouses are expected to sell for. Peterson estimated $45,000-65,000. Mr. H etch, 6937 Edenvale Blvd. , inquired how many feet would exist between the proposed townhouses and Cedar Point Townhouses. Peterson estimated 65 feet. H otch then suggested the plan be revised down to 5 townhouse units instead of 6. f< STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Jensen, Planning Assistant , TIIROUG!1: Chris Enger, Planning Director . DATE: March 20, 1978 APPLICANT: Hustad Development Corporation • PROJECT: Prairie East 7th,Sth S 9th Additions LOCATION: Adjacent to Co.Rd. 18, north and east of Linden Drive REQUEST: Rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 Preliminary plat approval for224 units on 40 acres PUD Development Stage approval BACKGROUND • The 1968 Guide Plan designates the proposals as single family residential. The current Guide Plan Update, although not finalized, indicates the sites of theS f°t as medium density; and t':c 7th as single family.The 7th f Sth proposed additions correspond closely with the Areas of 4 F, S of the original Prairie EAst POD 73-07. Concept approval of these two areas was approved in Res. 762 as follows: " 2. Concur with the Prairie East proposal in. that Areas Sand 6 in the P.U.D. be designated as residential -,.reas but that the housine tync and density not be determined until critical read decisions arc made. 3. Recommend that Area 6 be developed i _. „� . --.� .+ more closely akin with Area 2 in ic. � . '�� • low mid density ranges rather •j It •i 1 ® 1, than the medium to high." 1 /f."•. 1,.4 .. ) t" '"rij • i' The original PUD outlined a greenway • ; �, _,,-,.. .r' system which was reinforced by the approval,d •r•-• r• • of Prairie East 2nd Addition and the (2) �•. _.�. . platting of Outlots A F, 8•as quasi-public , t open space for the grecnway.At this time ' �, 1 a homeowner's association was to own and ( T maintain the open space , grecnway, and L It +;.trails. In 1976 the 2nd Addition was to rcplatted at the proponent's request bet?IAA{ �u� 73-07 ato 60 .lots. L _ v �\\�L.\Ro. , 690 •r.•.Tt't4%ibtt:"`ut . 1+:'f • Staff Report-Prairie East 7th,8th E9th -2- March 10,1978 The greenway corridor and trails were eliminated because of the proponent's difficulty in establishing a homeowner's association. The idea was then to move the trails into the street ROW, so that the City would be responsible for maintenance, but still providing the connection between Anderson Lakes and the future park site in the Co. Rd. 1/Franlo Road area. 6f:VE T ' To sir aAPTEFF I ' EEC" 9 •��OcppL7fi� .- i EMI I �y 114 i rr�l flit? en 3 ' • if �._._ 9 (fatal;EAvr is;141 '� ` The proposed 9th Addition was platted as an outlot for Prairie East 3rd Addition. Platting and rezoning approvals only were received for 85 single family lots in the 3rd Addition. Both the 3rd and proposed 9th Additions are oustside of the original PUD • In 1977 Prairie East 3rd was proposed and approved for 85 lots. Trails were required for Buckingham Drive and Linden Drive in the road ROW according to Fig.2. A supplement to the rezoning agreement called for conveyance of a G acre and a 2 acre mini-park. (see *'s on Fig. 2) North of the proposed 7th Addition is single family residential zoned R1-13.5 in The Preserve. The 8th and 9th Additions are bordered on the east by Co. Rd. 18, and on all other sides by single family residential, as is the7th Addition. Staff Report-Prairie East 7th,8th G9th -3- March 20, 1978 11 Igo• � 2.5 ):3..„5 4!..1 . 1 ii p•nt� i_ LOCATION MAP ti/ "' i i� �f :_r____....) o --La. 5.d�k ji,/i 2�r.• R.1- �1 Io n.la;o 15.5 rC l�.� ------ YC4 r t .', „j.,, r rt L. 1 7t -n. nner i �tcrsl sf , .zca-i 1.- 1 1 7 -. . -•i WI•cs t1,w cd 4 )L �d-._ c I l 4th ,II•I; ! _ •L:.1.9t1,_ - i !;25n. [.rd\ ❑ :r ZONING REQUEST —\..‘ • The prouc.: it requests rezoning from P••-•11 to RM 6.5 and preliminary plat approval for 224 townhouse units on 40 acres. The breakdown of units in each addition is as follows: • 7th Addition 14 acres 56 units 4u/ac 8th Addition 12 acres 80 units 6.7u/ac 9th Addition 14 acres 88 units 6.3u/ac • The overall density fcr the 3 additions is 5.6 dwelling units/acre. The maximum density allowed in Ord. 135 for the zoning district R14 6.5 is 6.7 units/acre. The following are provisions outlined in Ord. 135 for the Zoning District RA1 6.5: • 30 foot front yard setback 10-25 foot side yard setback; one side, both sides 20 foot rear yard setback 6,500 sq.ft. per dwelling unit , or 6.7 units/acre Front yard setback variances are requested from Ord. 135 to allow for 20 feet instead of 30 feet. n2 • i Staff Report-Prairie East 7th,8th 69th Adds. -4- March 20, 1978 TRANSPORTATION Access to all 3 additions will be from Linden Drive which loops into Prairie East and connects to Co. Rd. 18 in two locations. A series of small loops and cul-de-sacs serve the 3 townhouse additions. It is expected that the 224 units will generate about 1,568 aver- age . trips per day. This figure is based upon 7 trips per unit/day. These trips will be split between Co. Rd. 18 and Franlo Road, probably with a higher proportion using Co. Rd. 18 to get to 1-494. Franlo Road will be fed through Buckingham Drive and will be a collector route along with Anderson Lakes Parkway and Preserve Boulevard to the Major Center • Arca. Along with major development in Western Bloomington the additional trips projected for Co. Rd, 18 will require future upgrading and signalization at major intersections. The County is requesting the developer to dedicate an additional 10'ROW on Co. Rd. 18, for a total of 60 ' from centerline. A policy of 50' setback from a collector road has been established by the City. The staff feels that the SO' setback from a minor arterial is necessary. Many of the townhouses have setbacks as low as 10 feet from Co. Rd. 18 • requested ROW. the County is also concerned abort noise levels along Co. Rd. 18 , especially regarding residential uses. By the Year 2000 it is projector. that Co. Rd. 18 will carry 40,000 ADT. The County and City staff feel that residential uses along a high capacity road, such as Co. Rd. 18, should have noise abatement measures taken for it. Berming and dense shrub and tree plantings should he done by the development during site grading and preparation. The staff requests that a noise abatement plan for the 7th,8th 6 9th Additions be submitted to the City and County for approval prior to any final approvals. PARKS, OPEN SPACE, TRAILS: Two mini-park afeas are proposed by the developer for dedication to the City. The area in the 7th Addition is a 4.3 acre parcel, most of which is lowland ponding for the area's stormwater.and back yards for the town- houses. A 4 acre parcel is to he purchased from Mr. Finholt and is west of .Prairie_F.Ast 3rd Addition and the proposed 4th C5th Additions. This parcel is also a storm water outlet area. The proponent is requesting , in the 7th Addition , the front ' yard setbacks he lessened to twenty ( 20 ) feet to allow for more open space behind the units in an attempt to enlarge the proposed mini-park to usable game field areas. The staff feels that the area is too small for game field play as the proponent has illustrated. The arca is about the right dimension for informal frisbee or hall throwing as might take place in.a hack yard. The staff recommends that this area be retained it homeowner's association ownership and he maintained by them. The trail from The Preserve's Garrison Forest to Linden Drive 4 shall also be maintained and owned by the 1IOA. The ball fields (fig 3), arc shown in their actual size and as the developer envisioned them. Figure on following page. Staff Report-Prairie East 7th,8th 59th Adds. -5- March 20,1978 Figure 3 illustrates that the gale field(mini-park) area is too small for ballfields and therefore City ownership. flowever, as an open space amenity . stormwater ponding areas, and a desirable buffer to single family be owned and maintained by the 110A, it would be a definite plus for the develohn:cnt. :J_ ., • � - IV° -C-I2"l•-- -•`- 1�� `i t�` t// ter-": -.t.•-..i . 7\ 1 F-T-T° ituowj I596311.4 Y The second storm water pending �1 r r-t-;,-;)-- `,,'( 1•-1:.�•i.-\``7Y �,k,,/'--;, ; area of 4 acres is located ad- F�>^-.l`- --:'/ ' s ' •4,1-i •J',c.-�....:.i jacent to Prairie East 3rd,4th i 1 1 7��1 _v %* , 1 " - ]1 and 5th Additions(see Pig.4) I L1 Pie y1 ,�� k �;�t ,w � � There is no room on this 4 1 1-- >,a ‘- �_1-L, )' openr)1 - -..= V: !:. , 1 _,. acre piece either for an ,� �i game fields due to steep tope- \ L(?1• • P*" y Z.. yy graphy and the storm PondinCarca. 1,- . The staff feels that the level- X•; 1 nun r«wr <<"ir.5nat..,t `,f ,,•. , • oper should provide additional ,_.�_; ': \ ') i ,yt% f _ acreage for the mini-park. 4-_ _,•�'�' "' "L-+' how the 4 - � -4 e-_ v,- i; Fig, Sa illustrates ' :� . • � � ,, ,..: acre site is rcaly only largo • • {A� p • 1 _, .} ` ,�'. • enough for a small open game - • i Af 11' •,eo( / '- 1 1L. •. field space. Fig. >b illus- ; r{� � .,:__..,\ trates how the developer had �> :ie;l1 - \ env isianc.l the use of the r•-- ,\t proposed mini-park. Pncilities ` r 7 ^ \., , .�. which should be in the mini 1 's I ' / ' } �._� bbb t: o �. park are ? open g,1mc field •a, areas and space for apossi- _ O, . r... ble small parking area and • • 'l 2 tennis courts. Appropriate .'( _ o ,�:\ (1 p area for these faci 1 i ties 1C4,t`,,"; 'ly UUll ..•�„t,1 ho S-19 acres of total - tL,i •' 1-f -Sb- • The storm water pond could be used for ice skating in the hinter. • This applies however only if the neighborhood park site chosen is south of Co. Rd. 1. . A road is shown in the development plan for Prairie East Sth Addition • dead-ending at the southwest corner of the proposed mini-park area, sec fig. 5a. Future development would extend this road and remove more of the park space. Considering this and the fact that the proposed mini park is too small as shown by the proponent, the staff requests the developer to provide additional space and show how the future road will work in relation. rforw•�i �tnu;It1'" I i II fs . 1 \ . it i I i� •. ____. • 1I � 1 i )r)- - , \ .. ,. lI ,, 'o 1 ....,_ . J / . `'"•J L�—_-___ g . \ Vim` / ..„E---, .....,. »r11YI�� -\�� \\j] l in goQ� 1 ;.>:.q-Ttl- =�1i?.., t i ,!, 1 r� I t i i ' �� i�� - ;\ .� �� .)2- . • Ill N. /7----Li--7 _i__ ; J, / ,1 ‘mi,-‘r: .11 .. L. .*.....N••Sir: 4----4. l'..) ' qi4 • \ j l / 7,---z. --.-7'L......_..."\CA4•_..._ •,... ...'.••<-.11,. / • � T.•tf;,._. . . , / i ter ) I'lL- t,, \t t'` It '` • Staff Report-Prairie East 7th,8th 49th Adds., -6- March 20, 1978 • • If the neighborhood park site on the northeast quadrant of Co. Rd. 1 and Franio Road is chosen, the staff recommends that both storm ponding areas be kept in the homeowner's association and suggest that no mini-park site of City ownership be added in the Prairie East area. In such a case,mini-parks will be recommended for future development directly south of Co. Rd. 1. Trails should be completed by the developer in the Prariie East area • as follows: 1. HOA trail from Garrison Forest Addition connecting to proposed • Preserve trail, through open space area and to Linden Drive. • This section of the trail will be maintained by the HOA. 2. Sidewalk on the west side of Linden Drive in the ROW from the proposed 7th Addition, south to Buckingham Drive. 3. Sidewalk on the north side of Buckingham Drive existing and proposed extension , to Franio Road from Linden Drive. 4. Sidewalk on the east side of Franio Road from Laurel Drive south to Co. Rd. 1. All publi, sidewalks shall be at least S' wide concrete constructed according to City standards. The sidewalks shall be continuous from Garrison Forest to Co. Rd. l except where interrupted by streets. (refer back to fig 2). Where trails cross streets or roads, curbs shall he ramped for bicycle and handicapped use. 1�\� ) i;\ n t"` cn o `(, ""` iL, 7 r;� `• rnF A./ 1. '"F �__ftr:"1 ''t{ EnD Pn SOILS, TOPOGRAPHY, GRADING: r., <;-i I.�. E^;;,(y, ' CCOCA€, rr'7. 4t..•E !'''�, 1 Soils `�,tl,w o• 1r.\ 1 r 1 The major soils on the site are Wessel ..f r ''"",,i� \ t and Erin, both dcep, loamy and well-drained =+;'° �� rl?`r.• ,1� J \ \•. to poorlydrained. Bearing capacities and '! �' j `m5' g o �C• !,;,i,, �� i , ,,,,o shear strength are fair and frost action --, \� _ ) /e . (t r n is moderate. Other soils found on the site 5•\� 1 ,r,, _ 4 Nru t\j <, are: v / /.c "VsN: rw Lerdal loam - 1. :1 `J� Peaty muck ww,1•'�(� i :•� � Hamel loam . \ ")` 1 1'JnC ��y T.1'. Glencoe silty clay loam _);oo�`! '� - �`�� Cordova silty clay loam \ ll ,,,•N Be der sandy loam )1: ,t ' Hayden clay loam `,o ''"t• .� ��' � ---:I ,c� Biscay clay loam • ) '1.� 1 LAp ,. • The peat soi I s (Pm), Hamel (Ha), Glencoe(Gc) ( �'t.. U) {rnc :,.. •Hoc Cordova(Co), and Biscay (Bd) soils have \ \� ), '•�t.�j<' severe limitations for residential develop- n,i :��.—��`�\,t,:•.r`".lrjli, `a,;_. • meet. These soils range from organic to ,'' y!�'"�li,,,•'1, •,__,�1„�:yCi,:a,_,___ A� -I'C rh,U rq • Staff Report-Prairie East 7th,8th Oth Additions -7- March 20, 1978 sandy in texture, most are poorly drained. Hamel and Cordova soils could have the water table near the ground surface as many as 90 or more consecutive days in a year. Bearing capacities range from poor on the peat and Hamel soils to moderate good on the Biscay soils. The hazard of frost action and volume changes with changes in moisture are high on most of these soils. Generally the soils are good but there are numberous smaller areas of poor soils, as mentioned above. Excavation of all organic soils should take place in all areas not to be left as open space. Backfilling with a coarse, granular material is preferred. Drain tiling should take place around foundations wherever these poorer soils are encountered. Fairly wide footings should also be used. • Topography The topo on the sites are gently rolling, small upland land features, and numerous depressional areas. Vegetation on the site is primarily upland grass species, lowland grass and sedges and some tree cover. The main tree species are oak, elm, and boxelder. Any elm trees marked for Dutch Elm Disease should be removed prior to April 15, 1978. Grading • The grading of the site is shown to be extensive. Much of the existing vegetation will be removed in the grading and construction. Marginal oak trees should be removed as they are very susceptible to construction damage. Storm Ponding • The staff has received complaints from residents concerning the storm water situation between the first and second additions. Presently, storm water runs from the pond in the 7th Addition and between the first and second additions. however, the ditch is poorly defined and results in near flooding of some of the homes in wet periods or during spring runoff. A storm water pipe is recommended for this area by the engineering staff. The staff recognizes that with the development of the 7th Addition, runoff • will be increased due to the higher proportion of hard surfaces and recommended that the improper drainage of storm water be corrected with the construction of a drainage swale or installation of a pipe . Staff Report-Prairie fast 7th,8th £,9th Adds. -8- March 20, 1978 FUNCTIONAL AND AESTHETIC RELATIONSHIPS The townhouse units arc all served by streets fronted onto Linden Drive. From these "streets", many drives and parking areas take their service. The problem of maintenance by the City, specifically snow plowing and snow storage, becomes evident. Very little area is retained for snow storage when the street is lined with driveways and parking areas and ending in a cul-de-sac. The interior streets should be owned and maintained by the 1IOA with a utility easement given to the City. This should be worked out with the Engineering Department prior to final plat approval. 61.1 � 0, L\ L O " $ ,0 t. \ t r` .:*----.— : 4, =ram .._, 4. ,411474V' . . ,--- 134. \ 0) , ':.,: ' ..--- . ....--__..... ',3'-------- '/'- -----.......'------...\------- s". C)\'‘c:\11.: ...--- . Figure 6 illustrates how the front doors of some of the townhouse units are directly adjacent to parking and driveway areas of other units with only a small strip provided for grass or shrubs. Without the 20 foot front yard setback variance requested. the units could possibly be loosended up a bit in areas, such as described above, aad eliminate need for any parking areas on the street by lengthening driveways slightly. c',r,'r 6'!C LANDSCAPING, SCREENING Seeding and sodding should occur immediately following construction and grading to keep soil loss due to erosion at a minimum. Slopes exceeding 12% should have extra care especially on the sandy loam soils. Ordinance 178 requires parking for multiple residential units be screened from public roads. The staff recommends the use of earth berms to a sufficient height and shrub and evergreen tree plantings. This combination gives a year around effect. Also, trees should be planted between low density single family residential and obtrusive views in theproposed townhouses, such as views down the entire length of a street or direct visual contact to parking or general utility areas. • RECOMLMENDATI ONS: The Planning Commission may choose to take action on any of the following recommendations: 1. Approval of preliminary plat and rezoning from Rural to PM 6.5 as submitted by proponent. • 2. Approval of preliminary Plat for 224 units and rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 with modifications as follows: a) the developer shall dedicate additional R01J along Co. Rd. 18 for a total of 60 feet from centerline. A 50 foot setback shall be observed from that ROW line. b) the 4.3 acre mini park proposed for dedication • to the City in the 7th Addition be kept in own er- ship by the 110A as an open space amenity,buffer, &storm water pending area for the project. Maintenance of this area shall also be the 110A responsibility with storm sewer utility easements given to the City. c) The other 4 acre proposed mini park he deciated to the City along with additional acres to allow for 8-10 acres of usable open space. The developer should pro- vide additional acres that make sense with the future road extensions and not provide land that in the future will have to be used for streets. Space for the following facilities should be provided for: 1 softball field, l open game field area, and space for possibly two tennis courts. This would apply only if the neighborhood nark site south of Co. Rd.1 is chosen. If the northeast site is chosen, a mini parked owned and maintained by the City is not necessary in the Prairie Bast Area and the 4 acre storm pond area would be kept in I0OA ownership. Mini-parks would then he consi- dered for active recreation south of Co. Rd.1 ` in the future developments. -Staff Report-Prairie East 7th,8th Pi9th Additions March 20, 1978 page 10 d) The trail through Prairie East Area be completed as • shown in fig. 2 and described in 3/20/78 staff report. The trail will provide a connection from Anderson Lakes to the school/park site and further south in the future. All sidewalks be constructed by the developer as outlined in this report. e) All areas of poor soils be excavated to an aporo- • priate depth and back filled and compacted in order to provide lots requiring only normal foundations. f) Preserving natural vegetation and landforms wherever possible in the grading process. Re-vegetation should occur immediately following grading and construction to prevent excessive soil loss from erosion. • g) All elm trees marked for Dutch Elm he removed prior to April 15, 1978. Marginal oak trees should be removed during construction to avoid more costly removal later. Oak trees are very susceptible to construction damage. • h) Storm water drainage swales be improved between the 1st and 2nd additions. Increased runoff will cause further prcblems unless alleviated. Installation of a pipe is the more pre:,,: able solution. i. Provisions of Ordinance 135 be followed. The staff • feels that the front yard setback variance requested is not desirable or warranted. j. All interior streets be owned and maintained by HOA, but constructed according to City standards. Utility easements shall be conveyed to the City. k) The provisions of Landscaping Ordinance 178 be followed including screening of parking and utility areas from public roads. Tree plantings should also occur where necessary for buffering from surrounding residential uses. 1) All lots be subject to payment of cash park fee as per Ord. 332. m) A detailed noise abatement plan for the 7th,8th, 'and 9th Additions be submitted to the City and • County for approval prior to any final approvals. Earth berms should be incorporated with dense tree and shrub plantings to provide the desired noise deflection and absorption. ' 3. Denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning request based upon March 20, 1978 staff report. The Planning Staff recommends Alternate M 2 . d JPJ:j m j �� DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION i•%;,� . 320 Washington AV. South _ '-' 'i Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 \ "� NENNEPIN it935-3381 March 27, 1978 Mr. Chris Enger, Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: RE: Proposed Plat - "Prairie East 7th, 3th, and 9th Additions" CSAH 18 - West side at Linden Drive Section 25, Township 116, Rance 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 644 P^view and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. The above referenced plats are acceptable with consideration of the following: 1. The developer should dedicate additional right of way as follows: - 7th Addition and 9th Addition - 10 feet, for a total right of way width of 60 feet from and along the centerline of CSAH 18. - 3th Addition - 27 feet, for a total right of way width of 60 ftet from and along the centerline of CSAH 18. 2. As shown on the site development plan, all access from the plat to CSAH 18 crust be via existing Linden Drive. A new direct access to CSAH 18 will not be permitted. Any planned revisions to the Linden Drive CSAH 13 intersection will require a new entrance permit application. Permit forms are available from our Traffic Division. 3. We recommend construction of a turn lane and a by-pass lane at each of the Linden Drive CSAH 13 intersections. In 1976, the average • . daily traffic (ADT) along CSAH 18 between CSAH 1 and Amsden Road HENNEPI(NN COUNTY ) an equot opportunity gn4Aoyer Chris Enger, Planning Director Prairie East 7th, 8th, and 9th Additions Page 2 was 2775 vehicles. In a subsequent study conducted in February, 1978, along the same road segment, 5090 vehicles (unadjusted count) were counted. Traffic volumes will continue to increase as development continues and the area changes from rural to urban. Expected benefits resulting from implementing this recom- mendation include improved roadway capacity and most importantly increased roadway safety. 4. We recommend that the City consider noise abatement measures in both site development plans and in building design for the areas adjacent to CSAH 18. The Audible Landscape: A Manual for Hgh- way Noise and Land Use, prepared for the U. S. Department of Transportation in 1974, is a good reference source for noise impact concepts. 5. A drainage problem has developed at the southerly intersection of CSAH 18 and Linden Drive. Runoff from Linden Drive is eroding the shoulder along the County road. Plat approval should be contingent upon the developer correcting the drainage in conformance with Entrance Permit No. 1452 - copy attached, and upon the developer repairing the damaged shoulder areas. The developer should contact Don Murphy, Traffic Division, for additional information. 6. All proposed construction within aunty right of way requires County approval before beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage construction, utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. A utility permit is required for this work. Utility permit forms are available from our Maintenance Division. 7. The developer must restore any area within County right of way that is disturbed during construction. Please direct any response or questions to Douglas Mattson at this office. Sincerely, t/James M. Weld, P.E. Chief, Planning and Programming JMW/DBM:bg Attachment cc: Dick Putnam Hustad Development Corporation Gary Backer Hennepin County Surveyor's Office y IIENNEPIT')COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Permit No, ti I',JS. { 320W.rhin,iO11 Avenue Saud) Location Code iI Hopkins,Minnesota 55143 DRIVEWAY OR STREET ENTRANCE PERMIT AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS SPECIAL PROVISIONS • --- Date C/2u/77 {J 1.O"l d C.. rII' iry td inspected by__:_------ -- - `id cation - 1/4 "i "orta of .:1 Speed zone 5� A.D.T. 2775 1_- 7f j+ Right 700t �htdistance: Actual•Left -- — Minimum-Left__— -�1-- Right 70J ' •rb to be removed to: ❑ Construction Joint ❑ Sawed Joint IOC AC .•L Q T. Culvert diameter (15 rt NI'0. commended drainage: [I Surface n Culvert Culvert length— Equalizer on applicant's property. f -roe of sidewalk: n Concrete ❑ Bituminous U Cutback required I✓ . CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS PNithin Right-of-Way) BASE SURFACE CURB SIDEWALK SHOULDER BLVD-DITCH • ,i is Type Type Type_ Topsoil Type�_�.i Depth__'--- a Depth____IL__Depth ' ' Ucpth_s'' 111 Design • Depth Depth +Seed or Sou TRAFFIC CONTROL REOUIR[MENTS Series) Advance Warning(200-300 Series) Steady Burn(500) Barricades(100 Cones(28"•Day Glo) SPECIAL PROVISIONS • One 32' street with 29' radii approved per submitted plan. All access must be to internal street - No direct access to Co. Rd. 18. 1r1PORTAT)T: Create low point in street to prevent drainaca onto Co. Rd. 13. Approved utility permit required for work within ri311t of way (storm seller, water, etc.) . DO NOT PLACE CONCRETE ON COUNTY RIGHT-OF•WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. . IF YOU HAVE ANY OULSTIONS CALL"DRIVEWAY PERMITS"935.3381 EXT 216 , I Diagram A I Diagram B RAV IMPORTANT: TYRE"a"CONSTRUCT ROUNDED BERM TO CA. IMPORTANT: CONSTRUCT SWALE TO DIVERT WATER FROM RAN -- PIIL VLNT WATEn Timm RUNNING BOON SHOULDER. DRIVE. • b• l 6"Swale [T'Berm I Ortvevr� s.OrivawaY —1--- S�F.fI"'Z.. 7.^Lvixtin7 tload vay ..r n...,._..,_. I� --- Shoulder sirn,nne. 1 rirrttl: f..:!t;,, 'Q ,�,,., Place culvert In ocisting ditch 1..6:Srl 1.11 l.s� 1 A R tf'a�t'.�. E� R'{9 if I (rI".(lft,:C fr I� i l¢ �s;ftrta i.�F'•—ItEVIE1VEDBY — DATE Culvert furn,shed_-_— DESIGN MAINT. Data of delivery inspection . Final in spectiirn data.— ---- Dr iveway was tumid to be n Satisfactory n llnsatrslar.IOrV APPROVED/DENIED! HENNI PIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC SECTION Inspected by_—• - g ':-)J3 Date. f:./K .71 . `,.„\. .-..ss......: • \\ 1 i,:-_-,,-;:._.:.17.____--_____-9:-.1:i.77.-1::c)_:-..z,f,. _ :.\C"?‘../Orr ,,,., r( i �' ` \ ._, 3 r- i I • "...fr.,• Z -sss _ ce........iii -11 > o ni;; �� j • / —�i • (Cra; t uc09 \\i \ 7 •.7 ' C33'N1 -k . \ --__:r 1 li-)'.'t.:.. , t, , . ve',4N ...; • 6 7•':2t---11/////t7: • 7-'-'7 -\ 7,0>,,,C\ . ,1,.......„.....,.. 7 \• __.:;;;T:-.-. i --....,,,,, .,/!, ,„, ......: ._, , ,, ....._....-_,,,..N../ 1 --0,33 ti / , I. ,1 • { : /� ion z b`�a' ��i I V ''.I: 3 \ ''''''';:-....,----...„... .,, ,:f kics(/' r -- \ (7:I.., Cl /' T( • / 9H . • \ \\, ; „. ,). . r , \'k ..... / / k -' \ ----\ \\......_. _,-- ,, 1 .. I. \ ; i ; ;5-- -.3-- , ' , 1 11 i ,---' ...- / \ t;\.•t ( ' -, \ \\\ //,,,...-: ,,,,, ..........„ . ; \ , ) f j, 1 G y)9 '1 it ! t __ r'.. _. .. _.» . -A% \,. " '`Is q.) ,. C • 1 0 •1, . 1 4 Z ' . & •6 ., . 650 ,' • . t'` • .. 0 ' ?4,. •P • .. • C;) . . ; .• . . • . . • . , • • • • , ..- 0 •0 • 'V • . „ 0 , , . \ . s.4°' '• •. • '. C'.'1* \ •, . t(% • • .. , • ', •• •'V '• s'• •.' . ' .'\. ____\ •. ., .. . . . . , . • . • ... „ . ., • .. . • , , . . . /s? . . •2., • 0 . . .••• •.< . </ • -• • -A\ s ' \ .5' )' ( . . • .. ' - ...' ..• ir 13 '.1‘• •,,:. < .. 0 00 tcs , . ,•,....' ...:* '.. ' -(-1 \‘".,- ,.,..:.. '•ID i • - - . . , ., „. . \ • \ ,Ss .. ,.. .„, 's*ikt1/4 , s.• % / :1-... / / '• ! i • • • . ... • . . • .... ... ,- . .„., ... , .,',. •„ ....'..,• . re) .....• N \‘,/227.,‘.--/f 0 i / 5:1 • ---•._ , 0., . , \I )-.-------4 / , • I;V's G 0 1. - --4.--":11 ..-i. . .. • . • ... ... ....„. •...• ., . •.„.„ .. . •• , .. .... • , ... .,„ ...., , •. • .. \ . . . . 0 <0, / f . . . .• ss • . • , . . . . . . :........... . •. .... .... ,,....."....‘. . ..: \ . \ s, • Ato. is u vo„. . • \ t<, \ • . ...... ..... o • • . c eS, ..., „ . A\ . •-' •• - 0„ • . 'Po • sl, . • • . . ..".• . . .. .. \ . • ,,'.. -.. • . 9 •• ,\K ..:...- ...\'.....\ . ... \\\ \ - . . • • • . . •... ' . . 0 z -• -.. . ... , . ./... \ Otrr /V..) • March 23, 1978 Community Services Staff Recommendations PRAIRIE CAST 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9th Additions Supplement to March 20, 1978 Planning Staff Report PRAIRIE EAST 4th is 73 single family units on 30.6 acres. PRAIRIE EAST 5th is 100 units on 17.3 acres. PRAIRIE EAST 6th is 52 single family units on 20.9 acres. PRAIRIE EAST 7th is 56 multi family units on 12 acres. PRAIRIE EAST 8th is 80 multi family units on 12 acres. PRAIRIE EAST 9th is 88 multi family units on 14 acres. Total of 449 units. The developer is proposing two mini park sites. A 4.3 acre parcel most of which is lowland holding pond area in the lth Addition, and a 4 acre parcel adjacent to the proposed 4th and 5th Additions. This 4 acre parcel is also a holding pond area. Refer to Planning Staff Report for location and size of these parcels. At • the March 6, 1978 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting, the Commission voted unanimously that the neighborhood park serving this area of the community be located on a northeast quadrant of the intersection of Franlo Road and Co. oad 1. The Planning Commission; however, decided that the area south of County Road 1 would be a more appropriate site due to' the difference in the cost of the land. Mr. Putnam, from the Hustad Development Co., had submitted a proposed site plan south of County Road 1 that showed the realignment of Franlo Road. This site plan was more feasible than the proposed south site simply because of the road realignment and the terrain. This site plan would; however, require two property owners to agree on the sale of the property for a park site. The property owners being Hustad's and the Reichow's. Another concern on this proposed south site is the cost of realigning the road. After reviewing Prairie East 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9th, the Community Services Staff has the following recommendations: • 1. Require 8 to 10 acres for a mini neighborhood park site north of the road. This 8 to 10 acres should be in one site, rather than split as is the present proposal. 2. Obtain an option on a 15-20 acre park site south of the road for the neighborhood school/park site to serve this area of the community. This site would not have to be at the intersection, but could be further south because of the 8-10 acre site just north of the road. 3. Begin to acquire that new park site on a contract for deed basis making payments with the CASH PARK FEE as the CASH PARK FEZ comes in. This • ' agreement should also have a clause that would provide for a delay in payments if the number of building permits per year declines. 4. Community Services Staff concurs with the Planning Staff in that the small mini park in the 7th Addition is too small for any game field Play and that this area be retained in the homeowners association connected with the townhouses. }a( -2- 5. That the trail from the Preserve's Garrison Forest to Linden Drive should also be maintained and owned by the homeowners association. 6. The CASH PARK FEE of $275.00 per single family unit and $200.00 per all other residential uses be assessed to each of the new additions. BL:md i • • • 3/21/78 • ENGINEERING STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS PRAIRIE EAST 7TH, 8TH AND 9TH ADDITIONS Supplement to 3/20/78 Planning Staff Report 1. Some changes are required on the preliminary utility plans regarding mainly the proposed watermain system. These changes are noted on the Engineering Department's copy of said preliminary plans. 2. The City and Developer must agree, prior to preliminary plat approval, on ownership and maintenance of the various utility lines and services. 3. Hennepin County and Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District review required prior to preliminary plat approval. 4. Building setback variances will be necessary if the plats are approved as proposed. Also, the City and Developer must agree, prior to pre- liminary plat approval, which streets will be owned and maintained by the City through dedicated right-of-way. • • The cul-de-sac streets should remain in private ownership and be main- taiinti by the homeowners ass:.ciation The thru streets can be p'b1ic constructed to City standards (50'R/W 28' B to B) and maintained by the City. If setback variances are granted, the minimum setback of any garage to the curb line shall not be less than 30'. • 5. The Developer shall submit a finalized development plan, prior to final plat approval or building permit issuance which shall show proposed grading, stone water drainage areas and direction of flow, prelimi- nary utility plans, pending and floodplain high water levels for 100 year storm and minimum floor elevations for all buildings. 6. Assessment information: • The following assessments have been levied: #6452, trunk sewer and water, $59,163.14 #6438, Neill Lake Storm sewer, 2,160.00 CJJ:kh 4 February 2P, 1978 To: City of Eden Prairie Re: Pustad/Windsor's Plans for 7th Addition From: Tod & Susan Short 10101 Laurel Dr. Eden Prairie, Mn. 553!4 Tele: 941-8323 Prairie East 1st Addition, Lot' 35, Block 1 Gentlemen: • The plans for the 7th addition - 56 Townhouse Units - call for utility drainage into the small pond or lake on the land. This pond has a drainage runoff ditch that rang southwesterly some 233 feet, then turns south, crossing our lot (35). Windsor has indicated at one time or another that it plans to move this ditch down the back property lines separating 1st & 2nd additions. Due to some (3-4) elm trees behind their model homes (lots 7 & 8 - 2nd addition) this is not possible behind our lot without exposing the roots or killing the elms. Last year there was water in this ditch most of the time. Our concern is this: in the event of heavy rains, there will be sub- stantially more drainage into the pond from the 7th addition. There will then be much more overflow runoff from the pond down the ditch. We nre not pleased with the prospect of a veritable river through our back yard. should the ditch become clogged with leaves or other debris farther south of us, our backyard could become a lake (due to the gentle slope-grading of its banks in our yard). Whether or not basement flooding might occur might also oe considered. It must be pointed out that it seems that cur back yard is almost entirely considered drainage easement - a fact that we dad to learn at city hall by ourselves. We ask that you keep us in mind when planning the draining for the 7th addition and address yourselves to our situation by letter co that we can be informed of your plans. (over) :T'rli j 2. Our neighborhood has, of course, many concerns regarding this project, especially access to the park area, specific plans for the park, proper screening of the development with vegetation and/or hills. One other point that was not brought up in last night's hearing, was that the area around the pond is full of wildlife - pheasants, even some beavers, i. am told. it is a crying shame that anything has to be built there. Much wildlife will have to be destroyed, and the natural beauty of the whole pond area will be gone. it saddens us all, and, if nothing else, t hope it saddens you, too. We thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely) �.a0cf� ✓✓lJsJ� �!`Z1TCY .1 Tod L. and Susan T..short • 6 0 Z . • a ! J A E 2 , /4 . , 1. k. • 1.,, -, ,:t. ,,,,, -i q] , „_,/7.., ..„„ e ,,, r_ , • ''.,"/,.,, ,i„,/-,, , ,,- 0 /' /y,/,, ., ,'„'.,,,, ; \., ,,,, ri .y. , •,•, , ., .„..... . •// ., , . ./... , , , ,,,,, , .,„ , , g s''. ...._, ,,, \,..2,....K-r• • '1 4 . NN'N. q �, / TO: Mayor & City Council THRJ: Roger K. Ulstad FROM: John D. Franc DATE: April 13, 1978 RE: Super Valu - Request for M.I.D.B.'s Super Valu is requesting the City to give preliminary approval for Industrial Revenue Bonds for its new offices in Eden Prairie. Their request for rezoning has been given a first reading by the Council. The data submitted by Super Valu compared with our guideline is as follows: GUIDELINES SUPER VALU $500,000 $1,000,000 Audit for last 2 years furnished Dun & Bradstreet furnished Earnings 2 x principle and int.:..at 10 + + + JDF:bq 4/13/7U 912 RESOLUTION NO. 78-76 RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT UNDER 'I'DE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, REF'I:RRING THE PROPOSAL TO 'IIIE COMMISL1ONER OF SECURITIES FOR APPROVAL, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AND PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCU- MENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Legislature of the State of Minnesota in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended (the Act) has ' found and declared that the welfare of the State requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce through governmental acts to prevent, so far as possible, emergence of blighted lands and areas of chronic unemployment; has authorized municipalities to issue revenue bonds to finance, in whole or in part, the costs of the acquisition, construc- tion, reconstruction, improvement and betterment of projects, including any properties, real or personal, used or useful in concoction with a revenue prcr'eeing enterprise engaged in any business; and has authorized municipalities to enter into "revenue agreements" as defined in the Act with any person, firm, or public or private corporation or federal or state governmental subdivision or. agency (the "Contracting Party") providing for the payment by the Contracting Party of amounts sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal of and interest on the revenue bonds. 1.02. Pursuant to the authority of the Act, it has been proposed that the City issue its revenue bonds in an amount sufficient to pay part of the costs of the acquisition, construction, improvement and betterment of certain real and personal properties in the City to be used by Super Valu Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) , as its executive office building (the Project) and to make the . proceeds of the sale of those revenue bonds available to the Company, which will agree to pay the City amounts sufficient to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the revenue bonds, and to cause the Project to be constructed. The Project is presently estimated to cost in excess of $5,000,000. 1.03. The existence of the Project would add to the tax base of the City, County and School District in which the City is located and would provide increased opportunities for employment for residents of the City and surrounding area. 1.04. The City has been advised that conventional commercial financing_ to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would he significantly reduced, but that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low borrowing costs, the Project is economically more feasible. 1.05. This Council has been advised that revenue bonds of the City could be issued and sold upon favorable rates and terms Lo finance the Project. 1.06. There has been presented to this Council a form of Memorandum of Agreement relating to the issuance of revenue • bonds of the City to finance costs of the Project. Section 2. Approvals and Authorizations. 2.01. On the basis of information given the City to dote, it appears that it would be in the best interest of the City to issue its industrial development revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to finance part of the costs of the Project. • 2.02. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City and the issuance of revenue bonds for such purpose and in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 approved, • subject to approval of the Project by the Commissioner of Securities and of the purchasers of the bonds as to the details f the bond issue and pre-isions for their payment. 2.03. The form of Memorandum of Agreement is approved and the Mayor. and City Manager are authorized to execute the Memorandum of Agreement, with such changes as the City Attorney may approve, on behalf of the City. • 2.04. Tn accordance with law, the Mayor is hereby • authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner of Securities for his approval of the Project. The Mayor, City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with any preliminary information he may need for this purpose, and the City Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the - Project, if it is approved by the Commissioner. Section 3. Special Obligations. In all events, it is understood, however, that the bonds of the City shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbr.ance, l-egal or equitable upon any property of the City except the Project, if it becomes the property of the City, -2- ,a f ti • and each bond, .as, and if issued, is payable solely from the revenues from the Project and property pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City. • Mayor Attest: -- City Clerk -- i a • -3_ . 1 The total bond issue will he approximately $1,000,000 to be applied toward payment of costs now estimated as--Tollows_ Cost Item Amount I —Land Acquisition and Site Development $- Construction Contracts --9767-00 Equipment Acquisition and Installation Architectural and Engineering Fees _ Legal Fees 10,000 Interest during Construction Initial Bond Reserve Contingencies - Bond Discount 20,000 Other It is presently estimated that construction will begin on or about August 1 , 19 70, and will be completed on or about June 1 -19_8a then completed, there will be approximately • 50 new jobs created by the project at an annual payroll of ap- proxiiar tely $ 150000 based upon currently prevailing wages. The tentative lease term is • 30 years, commencing July_ 1 _, 19 78, and the tenant willZrcri-) have the opti.on to purchase the project for a nominal value upon expiration of the lease term. The municipality will provide the Commissioner with a •comprehensive statement indicating how the project satisfies the public purpose and policies of the Minnesota Industrial Development Act. A letter of intent to purchase the bond issue from an underwriter ., or an analysis of a fiscal consultant as to the feasibility of the • project from a financial standpoint is attached to this application. • We, the undersigned, are duly elected representatives of • Eden Prairie , Minnesota, and solicit your approval of this project at your earliest convenience so that we may carry it to a final conclusion. . Signed by: (Principal Officers) • This approval shall not be deemed to he an approval by the Commissioner or the state of the feasibility of the project or the terms of the lease to be executed or the bonds to be issued therefor. • Date of Approval: • • __-_—_ Couunissiotier of. Seciirilies Minnesota Department of Commerce . 7 . . .. IMPORTANT 1 '',.• :• This Application must be submitted to Commissioner in triplicate 714AM.-.:,)cAk** ***A.),*.Aii*Alci:ki.A1,41.k.i.AA.,U1..****-AkicA.**1,4.**-1.******** ..• .. ' . STATE OF MINNESOTA • . , DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE - SECURITIES DIVISION APPLICATION For Approval of Municipal_Industrial Revenue Bond Prlject Date :. To: ..• Minnesota Department of Commerce • . . Securities Division •., 500 Metro Square Building •: .: St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 •• .. r • , The governing body of Eden Prairie , County of _liounwia , Minnesota, hereby applies to the Commissioner of the State of Minnesota, .•• Securities Pivision of the Department of Commerce, for his approval of •this community's proposed Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond issue, as required by Section 1, Subdivision 7, chapter 474, MinneLota Statutes. •• • We have entered into preliminary discussions with: . .. FIRM Super Valu Stores, Inc. •.. ADDRESS 101 Jefferson Avenue South CITY Hopkins STATELliTIslaotl_____ • State of Incorporation _ Delaware ' Attorney.Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford,_whitney & Halladay 7:300 Filt National Hank Building Address Minnoapolis, Minnesota This firm is engaged primarily in (nature of business): . Wholesale food distribution__ • The funds received from the sale of the Industrial Revenue Bonds will be used to (uneral nature of project): Corp_9rate headquarters .. -- ---- . ------------------ .. ,! It will be located in --- Eden Prairie .. ' --- — :. .. 8/1/77 -1- ...: • TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: John D. Franc, Finance Director DATE: April 5, 1978 RE: C.P.T. Corporation - Request for M.I.D.B.'s C.P.T. is requesting the City to give preliminary approval for Industrial Revenue Bonds for their new quarters in Eden Prairie. Their plans arc to locate north of Scenic Heights Road, west of Mitchell Road (behind Eaton-Char Lynn). The property is presently unzoned, they intend to request zoning which is proper for their use. The data submitted by C.P.T. compared with our guidelines is as ] follows: GUIDELINES C.P.T. $500,000 $3,200,000 }. Audit for last 2 years furnished Dun & Bradstreet furnished '. Earnings 2 x principle and interest 4 + times C.P.T. exceeds our requirements, Resolution 78-69 is attached for your consideration. JDF:bq 4/5/78 Member introduced the following resolu- tion and moved it:; adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, UPON CERTAIN CONDITIONS, OF REVENUE BONDS OF THE CITY UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 474, FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING CERTAIN FACILITIES TO RE CONSTRUCTED BY CPT CORPORATION; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH SAID COMPANY; AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION BY THE CITY TO THE ' MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of. Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as fellows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Legislature of the State of Minnesota in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended (the Act) has found and declared that the welfare of the State requires active pro- motion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce through governmental acts to prevent, so far as possible, emergence of blighted lands and areas of chronic nncmploymcnt; has authorized municipalities to issue revenue bonds to finance, in whole or in part, the cost of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement and better- ment of projects, including any properties, real or personal, used or- useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise engaged in any business; and has authorized municipalities to enter into "revenue agreements" as defined in the Act, with any person, firm, or public or private corporation or federal or state governmental subdivision or agency (the "Contracting Party") providing for the payment by the Contracting Party of amounts sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal and interest on the revenue bonds. 1.02. It has been proposed that the City issue its revenue bonds, pursuant to the authority of the Act, in an amount not exceeding in aggregate principal amount $3,200,000 or such lesser amount as may be necessary to finance the cost of the Pro- ject hereinafter defined, to finance the cost of the acquisition, construction and equipping of certain real and personal proper- ties comprising a headquarters facility including office, manu- factur.ing, training and assembling facilities (all such properties and facilities being hereinafter referred to as the Project) , and to mate the proceeds of the sale of those revenue bonds available to CPT Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the Company) , which will agree to pay the City amounts sufficient to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the revenue bonds, and to cause the Project,to be constructed. The Project is presently estimated to cost approximately $3,000,000. 1.03. The City has been advised that conventional, com- mercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is avail- able only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Project or the economic feasibility of oper- ating the Project would be significantly reduced, but that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low borrowing costs, the Project can be constructed as designed and its opera- tion is economically more feasible. 1.04. This Council has been advised that revenue bonds of the City could be issued and sold upon favorable rates and terms to finance the Project. • 1.05. There has been presented to this Council a form of Memorandum of Agreement, relating to the issuance of revenue • bonds of the City to finance costs of the Project. Section 2. Approvals and Authorizations. 2.01. On the basis of information given the City, it appears that it would be in the best interest of the City to issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to finance costs of the Project and, accordingly, there is hereby authorized to be issued and the City hereby determines to issue, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Memorandum of Agreement, its revenue bonds, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $3,200,000, for the purpose of financing costs of the Project. 2.02. The form of Memorandum of Agreement is approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute the Memor- andum of Agreement, with such changes as the City Attorney may approve, on behalf of the City. 2.03. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended, the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Minnesota Commissioner of Securities for his approval of the Project. The Mayor, City Clerk, City Attorney and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with any preliminary information he may need for this purpose, and the City Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the prepar- ation of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project, if it is approved by the Commissioner. Section 3. Special. Obligations. In all events, it is understood, however, that the rev- enue bonds of the City shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except the Project, if it becomes the property of the City, and • each re'Jenne bond, when, as and if issued, shall be payable solely from the revenues received from the Project and property pledged -2- to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City. Mayor Attest:__ City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -3- 99.1 be applied tow,ud payment of costs now estimated as f.oIlows: Cost: T t c to Amount 1 l.,:nd Acquisition and Site Development $._ - -•300,000 Cum,;t rttct.ion Contracts 2,700,000V Equipment Acquisition and installation -_- _u^ Architectural and Engineering Fees Legal Pees i5,000 interest during Construction Initial fond i'.eserve Contingencies `_-- -- Cond Discount 104,000 Other ----- 81,000` — It is presently estimated that construction will begin on or about August. .l , 19 7a and will be completed on or about June 1 -19 80. When completed, there will be approximately —120.. new jobs created by the project at an annual payroll of ap • - proxtw Ccly $ 3,000,000 based ui,;on currently prevailing 'rages. The tentative lease term is _ 20• years, commencing 7vlh 1 , 19 '73, and the tenant-will.--"(not) have the option to purchase the project for a nominal value upon expiration of the lease term. The municipality will provide the Commissioner with a 'comprehensive statement indicating how the project satisfies i-.he public purpose and policies of the Minnesota industrial Development Act. A letter of intent to purchase the bond issue from an underwriter or an analysis of a fiscal consultant „s to the feasibility of the project from a financial standpoint is attached to this application. We, the urdcrsigned, are duly elected representatives of Eden Proirin Minnesota, and solicit your approval of this project at your earliest convenience so that we may carry it to a final conclusion. Signed by: (Principal Officers) This approval shall not be deemcc to be an approval by the Commissioner or the state of the frasihilit.y of the project or the terms of the lease to be executed or the bc.nls to be issued therefor. ' Date of ,Approval: Coiir.aiseiancr of Sr.curitics ��- Hitntc:,ot:a Department of Corunercc 8/1/77 TO: Mayor and City Council TH RU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: John D. Franc, Finance Director DATE: April 5, 1978 RE: Barrett Moving and Storage - Request for M.I.D.B.'s Barrett is applying to the City for approval of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds which will be sold to institutional investors in the form of mortgages. We have reviewed the data submitted by Barrett with the criteria in our resolution 596. { GUIDELINES BARRETT f, $500,000 $1,100,000 Audits for last 2 years furnished i*in and Bradstreet furnished Earnings 2 x principle and 3 + times interest The property is located in the Washington Avenue area and is zoned I-2. The applicant exceeds our requirements. jl Resolution 78-50 is attached for your consideration. 1i JDF:bq 4/5/78 • • • • 78-50 RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND FINANCED UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR APPROVAL THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. There has been presented to this Council a proposal that the City undertake a project pursuant to the Minnesota Mu- nicipal Industrial Development Act, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, consisting of the acquisition of land and construction thereon of a combination terminal-office building and a maintenance building (the "Project") in the City to be used by Barrett Moving & Storage Company. Under the proposal, a Minnesota partnership to be organized consisting of Mr. Robert H. Eidsvold, Sr., and either (i) mcaLers of his immediate family or (ii.) an inter visos trust, the income and remainder beneficiaries of which are members of Mr. Eidsvold'a immediate family (the "Eidsvold Partnership") will enter into a loan agrecr•:ent whereby *he Eidsvold Partnership agrees to construct the Project and the City agrees to issue up to approximately $1,100,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds of the City pursuant to the Act to finance the Project. The Bonds would be issued to institutional investors in a tax exempt mortgage private placement transaction whereby the Bonds would be secured by a mortgage of the Project. The Eidsvold Partnership wi].1 retain title to the Project and the site thereof and the loan agreement will require the Eidsvold Partnership to pay amounts sufficient to pay the pri.nci.pal of and interest on any Bonds issued. The Eidsvold Partnership will lease the Project to the Company under lease terms sufficient to provide for the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds. The Eidsvold Partnership's interest in the lease will be assigned to the bond- holders as security for the Bonds. The City will also assign its interest in the loan agreement to the bondholders to secure the Bonds. The Bonds shall. he issued in accordance with the Act, and shall provide that the Bonds are payable solely from amounts received by the City pursuant to the loan agreement and other p-opert:y pledged to their payment. The Bonds shall not be a general obligation of the City or be payable from any other property or funds of. the City. 2. There has been presented to this meeting a form of Application to Ccr.r.is:;goner of Secur.iti.ns for approve] of the Projec ',ei_Lidig i;,l:lh the estimated costs of the 'roject and the increased employment and payrolls to result therefrom. It is hereby found, determined and declared that the purpose of the Project .is and the effect thereof will be to promote the public welfare by the attraction, encouragement and development of economically round industry and commerce so as to prevent,• so far as possible, the emergence of bliyhted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; the development of industry to use the available resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of its existing investment in educational and public service facilities, by halting the movement of talented, educated personnel of mature age to other areas and thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; and the more .intensive development of land available in the area to provide an adequate tax base to finance the increase in the amount and cost of govern- mental services provided by the City, the County and the School District in which the City is located. 3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City, subject to (i) approval of the Project by the Minnesota Commissioner of Securities and (ii) approval of this Council, the )iidsvold Partnership, the Company and an institutional investor or investors of the ultimate details of the Project and the terms of the Bonds. 4. The Company is undertaking to make arrangements with institutional investors for the purchase of the Fonds. Upon receipt of a letter of intent to purchase the Bonds, the Mayor, City Manager and City clerk are hereby authorized and direct"; to submit to the Commissioner of Securities an Application for approval of the Project, substantially in the form presented to this meeting, together with the letter of intent necessary to complete such Application. The Mayor, City Manager and City Clerk and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with such prelimi- nary information as he may request. 5. The Company has agreed to pay any and all costs • incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or not the Project is approved by the Co;,;missioner and whether or not the Project is carried to completion. 6. The Company and the l:i.dsvold Partnership are hereby authorized to enter into such contracts as may be necessary for the construction of the Project by any means available to it and in the manner iL determines without advertisement for bids as may be required for the construction or acquisition of other municipal. facilities. Mayor — ----- — Attest: City Clerk ------ ------ ay HLV1bLU S--1/-ill • The total bond issue will be approximately $ 1.1 Million tobe applied toward payment of costs now estimated as icil1-o:.:s-:-----__— Cost Item • Amount • — Land Acquisition and Site Development • $ `308,500 ^— Constructi.on Contracts 11125,000___ Equipment Acquisition and Installation _ _40jO00 -{$caleJ _ Architectural and Engineering Fees Nominal--_--- —_- -- • — Le al Fees —22,500----- ----__- • — Interest during Construction ___16,625 ,__ _ _____ initial Bond Reserve __NA_ `_ • Contingencies 25,000 ____` • • Bond Discount __� �_ Other • Nnnunal__---- • — It is presently estimated that construction will begin on or • about 19 and will be completed en or about -- 19 When completed, there will be approximately --^— new jobs created by the project at an annual payroll of ap- proximately $ , _— based upon currently prevailing The tentative lease term is years, cor:iencin^ • 19 and the tenant :irr not) have the cation to purchase the project for a nominal value upon expiration of the lease term. The municipality will provide the Commissioner with a co;-:prei:e;sive statement: indi fnr, how the project aatigfles the public purposc aad policies of the Minnesota Industrial Development Act. A letter of intent to purchase the bond issue from an underwriter or an analysis of a fiscal consultant as to the feasibility of the • • project from a financial standpoint is attached to this application. We, the undersigned, arc duly elected representatives of Minnesota, and solicit your approval of this • project at your earliest convenience so-that we may carry it to a • final conclusion. Signed by: (Principal Officers) • • This approval shall not be deemed to be an approval by the Commissioner • or the state•of the feasibility of the project or the terms of the lease to be executed or the bonds to be issued therefor. • • • Date of Approval: 00 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-22 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLICY FOR CASH PARK FEES WHEREAS, the Planned Unit Developments of Preserve, Edenvale, and Hidden Ponds in connection with the original planned unit developments made substantial contributions of land and amenities to the City of Eden Prairie, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie: 1. The lands and facilities conveyed in connection with the original planned unit developments of the Preserve, Edenvale, and Hidden Ponds comply fully with the park fee requirements of the City of Eden Prairie and no additional cash fee payment will be required in connection with the original planned unit developments. All future developments proposed by the Preservr, Edenvale and Hidden Ponds outside of the original PUD will be subject to the ordinance of the City of Eden Prairie as to cash park fees. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of March, 1978. 1•lolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, Clerk SEAL • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Bob lambert, Director of Commninity Services{. SUB.IE(:!': CASH PARK FEE. DATE: April 14, 1978 The City Couaeii has directed staff to meet with the personnel from Edenvale and the Presrr•e to obtain the deeds for dedicated park property and to return to the Council with the a reccrnmendation on the CASH PARK FEE. The City staff has provided the Council with all of the relevant documents pertaining to the park dedication and the CASH PARK Flt, and the Preserve has also submitted copies of all of their documents concerning the Preserve commitments to park dedication. At the April 18, 1978 Council meeting the staff will present the following: THE PRESERVE • 1. A deed to the 840 plus SO line around Anderson lakes amounting to approximately 1S acres. 2. A dr..ft document committing to the approximate S2 acres of scenic easement around the west and northern shore of Anderson Lakes. 3. A letter committing to a deed on the 7 acres adjacent to Purgatory Creel. and a 17 acre deer corridor that will be signed over to the City as soon as that property is identified. 4. The City has already received a deed on the 22 acre Nesbitt Preserve Park site. Ebl i\'F A1.E 1. Deeds from Edenvale on their dedicated park property. Sec attached letter. The staff will also be submitting a resolution establishing a policy for CASH PAR): PIES en the Preserve, idcnvalc and Hidden Ponds in connection with the original Planned Unit Developments. I believe the Council new has all the information available on the CAS)1 PARK FEE and 11.1s tin- final c•,r,mii::cl:ts from the Preserve and Wenvale concerning park ded,catin:, and the c'AS;I iAR1: rill. The start is recomrmuding the Council approve the resolution and accept the d:cd:; from the Preserve and Edenvalc. FL:md • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-75 ACCEPTING DEED BY THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE FROM INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 272 FOR ROUND LAKE PARK WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie since 1968, has had under study the development of an East-West thoroughfare to provide essential highway transportation facilities for the residents of Eden Prairie, and WHEREAS, on January 28, 1969, and May 9, 1972, the City of Eden Prairie and Independent School District No. 272 entered into a Joint Powers Agreement for the development of park and recreational facilities to serve the residents of the City of Eden Prairie and the students of said School District, and WHEREAS, in the implementation of said Joint Powers Agreement,title to certain property was taken in the name of the School District with the understanding that title would be conveyed to the City on certain property in connection with the City's Land and Water Conservation Fund application, and WHEREAS, on September 16, 1976 a Joint Resolution of the Eden Prairie Council and the Board of Educaticn for School District No. 272 concerning the Site Development at Round Lake provided that the extension of Valle, View Road through the site will be located in a northerly alignment suitable to both parties and minimizing the adverse affects on the school site development and the park development, and WHEREAS, the School District has delivered to the City a Quit Claim Deed for 2.2 acres for the purpose or a fire station location, and a Quit Claim Deed for 41.77 acres which contained the provision: "Subject to the restriction that no roadway or public thoroughfare shall be located or constructed upon the described premises without the express and prior consent of the Grantor", and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eden Prairie accept said Quit Claim Deed with the provision stating: "That the extension of Valley View Road through the site will be located in a northerly alignment suitable to both parties and minimizing the adverse affects on the school site development and the park development, and that 72nd Street is regarded as a temporary road", as being provisions designed to assure compliance with said Joint Resolution provision concerning the extension of Valley View Road. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this day of , 1978. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 78-77 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN CITY PROPERTY. WHEREAS, the City previously purchased property duly described as: Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision Number 335, Hennepin County, Minnesota • and, WHEREAS, most of the said land purchased was taken for and used for highway purposes, and, WHEREAS, there remains 0.16 acre of said land which is not needed for highway purposes, and therefore may be disposed of, and, WHEREAS, the only feasible purchaser of said property owns the adjoin- ing property, and, WHEREAS, said purchaser has agreed to pay to the City for said property an amount equal to the first square foot cost of the original purchase. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that it does hereby sell Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision Number 335, except that part taken for highway purposes to B.B. 8 S., a co-partnership, for the sum of $9,768.33, plus the buyers paying the taxes due and payable in 1978 and subsequent years, and the unpaid special assessments, and does hereby authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Deed to said buyer for said property. ADOPTED by the City of Eden Prairie, Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • 931 MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THRU: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services FROM: James E. Jensen, Park Planner SUBJECT: Tennis Courts at Flying Cloud Airport DATE: March 31, 1978 I met with Ed McGaa on March 28, 1978 to explore several sites for tennis courts on the airport property. He is willing to provide the fencing and labor. Cedar trees could also be tree spaded in around the courts to provide landscaping and windscreens at no cost to the City. Land for the courts would be leased from MAC on a year to year basis, much the same as the ballfield area. I am now in touch with the leasing committee to determine the conditions under which the lease would exist. The staff feels that 2 or 4 courts should be built just east of the ballfield area • and directly rest of the radio towers. This site is very level and has very good soil conditions: a sandy loam texture. The courts would be easily accessible from County Road 1. MAC would also build a gravel access road and a small gravel parking The City would be responsible for installing the court surface. Two alternatives exist for installation of the asphalt surfacing, either contract the surfacing out or use the City paver and pneumatic roller to do the work. The surface will be laid in two lifts, a 1V base and a 1Y leveling course, on compacted subgrade of class 2 aggregate. Color koting will then be applied to finish off the surfacing. Estimated costs for contracting the surfacing are as follows: Asphalt laid ip_Tlace with color kote applied. Four Courts - $16,000 for surfacing and color kote 434 tons of 2341 $2 per sq. yd. for color kote $500 4 nets, material cost only $600 4 sets of posts, material cost $200 strapes, sleeve plugs, material cost $1,200 40 yds. concrete 0 $29.86 a yd., 3000 P.S.I. $1,000 subbase material class 5 $2.70/ton $19,500 T -2- Two Courts - $8,000 for surfacing and color kote 217 tons of 2341 $2 per sq. yd. for color kote $250 2 nets, material cost only $300 2 sets of posts, material cost $100 strapes, sleeve plugs, material cost $900 30 yds. concrete (d $29.86 a yd., 3000 P.S.I. $500 subbase material, class 5 $2.70/ton $10,050 The staff thinks that the paving and color kote should be contracted out because of the close tolerance desired on tennis courts. The cost of asphalt to do the job with the City's paver is too high to risk the drainage and tolerance factors. In fact, having the asphalt laid in place may be cheaper than buying the asphalt and laying it ourselves. The net posts could be installed by the parks crew at the same time the fence is erected by MAC. Lighting could also be provided by MAC with only the wiring cost to the City. The staff would like to investigate the potential of this particular type of light in a tennis court application before it would be installed. Lighting could ba installed next :..msner or as the needs and dw" uuds dictate. JEJ:md • • l:inutcs — Parks, Rec. and Unapproved l+atural Resources Commission .. 4 — Monday, April 10, 1978 4. Tennis C^urt Fromosrl for Flying Cloud Lambert spoke to two questions on theproposal: 1.) Where will the money come from for our share of construction? 2.) If we find the money, we should have a minie.um of a ten year lease on the property. He added that there is an unbeliev— able need for tennis courts, lie spoke further to using money from the park bond fund or cash park fee. 1•:GTIGli: Garens moved to recommend to the Council that we recommend the construc— tion of two tennis courts co 1113 land and that the approximate cost of $10,000, our share, come out of a cash perk fee fund, and that we protect our investment with a ten year or longer lease, based upon the Staff report of i•:arch 31, 1978. ?ifield seconded, motion carried unanimously. }jq MEMORANDUM T0: Mayor and City Council TIItiU: Roger K. tllstad, City Manager FROM: Bob lambert, Director of Community Services t_},- SUBJECT: Joint Use Agreement of Tennis Courts With School District DATE: April 14, 1978 In April of 1972, the School Board passed a resolution agreeing to cooperate with the Village in constructing tennis courts at the Round Lake Park site. That resolution also included a sentence that indicated the property would be deeded to the School District. The reason for the property being deeded to the School District was to eliminate any legal concern that the School District was spending money for items constructed on non school property. For what ever reason the transfer of title never occured. The four tennis courts were constructed at a cost of $35,766.50. The School District paid one-half of it, $17,883.25 on May 24, 1973. Recently the School Board requested that a formal Joint Use Agreement be developed so that no one can question the propriety of the School District's investment in the tennis courts construction. In February 197S, Merle Comm sent a copy of a proposed Use Agreement to the City staff to review. That original proposal was quite lenghty and the City staff was not satisfied with the language. Subsequently, Tir. Gaunt and 1. met to draw up an agreement that would satisfy the intent of the original resolution. After reviewing the revised proposal, the only concern that the Community Services staff had was under Section V, Use and Availability. This section only refers to the School District's priori ties; it does not address the City's responsibilities. The Community Services staff first recommendation was to add a section 5.3 stating the following: The City and the District agree that City recreation programs will share priority usage with the District's Physical program and the District's tennis team practice schedule. After reviewing that language with Mr. Camm, Mr. Gamm felt that that language would change the intent of the original resolution. After discussing our mutual concerns, we have agreed on the following language: 5.4 paragraph. The City and District agree that the City shall be responsible for the scheduling of usage of the outdoor tennis court facility except as provided for in S.1 through 5.3 of this agreement. With this language the School ttis;riot is still insured of priority usage for its tennis tcant:, and physical education programs, and the City determines the usage of the courts dnrinr all other time periods. This is basically the way the tennis courts have brew a for the last Tive years and we lane not haul any problems. The staff recommends that the Council approve the proposed Joint Use Agreement with the addition of 5.4 as ::t:,ted above. 131.:n:d AGREEMENT This agreement made , 1978, between Independent School District No. 272, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and the City of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. RECITALS 1. The District desires an outdoor tennis court facility • for its educational curriculum and extracurricular activities; and the City desires an outdoor tennis court facility for its community recreation program and for the health, welfare and safety of its citizenry. 2. Minnesota Statutes 47)..5 through 471.19 and 471.59 authorize the District and City to enter into this agreement for the e•nrlose of jointly establishing a program of public recreation and playground, including the acquisition, equipping, operation and mai.ntcnanc.e of land, buildings, or other recrea- tional facilities, and to expend the funds for the operation of such program which may be located on the property under the custody or either the District or the City or under the custody of any other public corporation, body or board, with the consent of such corporations, bodies or boards. 3. Each party desires to enter into a Joint Agreement establishing the responsibilities of each of the parties regard- • ing such a program and each party is willing to contribute money to finance the development of an outdoor tennis court facility, and the City is willing to contribute land. For the reasons recited above, and in consideration of the mutual covenants coi.taincd herein, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. Definitions: • 1.1 District - Independent School District No. 272. 1.2 City - The City of Eden Prairie. Section 2. Scope of Description: 2.1 Dy this agreement, the parties create a joint power and use program for• public education and recreation purposes within the boundaries of each political subdivision. Section 3. Conduct of Agreement: 3.1 Upon execution of this agreement, the parties agree to the terms and conditions of this agreement. 3.2 In the event that any controversies regarding this agreement arise, the City and District agree to submit the contro- versy to arbitration in accordance with the Uniform Aribttation • Act, P!incesota Ctatutc 572.08-572.30 and any amendments thereto. • 3.3 From time: to time the par.les by mutual agreement :-ay adjust the usage schedule contained in this agreement to reflect the needs of the District's educational curriculum and extracur- ricular or cocurricular activities schedules. Section 4. Contributions: 4.1 The City shall be credited with the contribution of the land upon which the outdoor tennis court facility is located and with payment of•the sum of $17,8C3.25 or one-half of the construc- tion cost of the outdoor court facility. 4.2 The District shall be credited with a contribution of $17,883.25 representing the District's payment of one-half of the costs of construction of the outdoor tennis court facility. The description of the property upon which the outdoor tennis court facility is constructed is as follows: 2 THE FOUR TENNIS COURTS IMMEDIATELY NORTH AND ADJACENT 1'O THE ROUND LAKE PICNIC PAVILION. Ownership of the property is and shall remain in the name of the City. Section 5. Use and Availability: 5.1 The City and District agree that the District's Physical Education Curriculum program shall receive priority usage during the school day of the outdoor tennis court facility covered by this agreement and the City shall make the facility available for use of the District whenever so necessary so long as the Dis- trict provides the City with schedules establishing such a need three months in advance of the date needed. • 5.2 The City and District agree that the District's tennis teams shall have priority usage of the outdoor tennis court facil- ity for practices and matches and the Ciiy shall make the facility • available ±...f the use of the tennis crams so long as the Distrt-ct furnishes the City o-:i 'th schedules establishing such a need at least three months in advance of the date when the facility is needed. 5.3 Any additional use or availability by the District may be mutually agreed upon by the parties from time to time. • Section 6. Operation of Facilities: • 6.1 During .thc term of this agreement the outdoor tennis court facility shall be operated by the City. 6.2 The City shall be responsible for minor repairs and main- tenance. 6.3 The City and District agree that the cost of net replace- ments shall be shared equally and the quality of the netting shall be reasonably suited to meet the needs of the District. 3 gag 6.4 The City and the District agree that the coot of jointly planned major resurfacing and major repairs shall be shared equally. Section 7. Insurance: 7.1 Liability: Liability Insurance. Each party shall be solely responsible for any loss, damage or injury to any person or property arising out of the use of the outdoor tennis facility by any person or persons under its jurisdiction or authorization; and each party shall hold the other harmless from and defend it against any claim, demand or cause of action initiated to recover the amount of any such loss, damage or claim for which is re- sponsible. Each party shall carry at its own expense comprehensive liability insurance covering its potential liability under this i section with personal injury limits of not less than One Hundred 1 Thousand ($100,000) Dollars per person and Three Hundred Thousand ($300,000) Dollars per occurrence and property damage limits of • Twenty i'ive Thousand (S25,006) Dollar Ter occurrence and rift" Thousand ($50,000) Dollars aggregate, or such other limits as may time to time be required under the provisions of Minnesota Statute 466.04 and any amendments thereto. 4 939 This agreement executed the day and year first written above: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 272 By Chairman l Clerk CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By 5 April 4, 1978 Community Services recommendations on Tennis Court Agreement Section 5. Use and Availabili : 5.3 The City and the District agree that City recreation programs will share priority usage with the District's Physical Education program, and the District's Tennis Team practice schedule. 5.4 Any additional use • etc. • • { qq1 • ianutes - Purls, Rec. and Unapproved 1:etural Resources Commission - 3 - Eonday,. April 10, 1978 2. Joint Use A-reercnt on Tennis Courts Lambert spoke to the agreement, and to his suggestion for change as far as rgrec:_cnt by the City end. the School District that City recreation programs share priority usage with the District's Physical Education program and District's Tennis Team practice schedule. hruell asked whether the agreei:.ent would cover any new courts. Lambert responded • that it referred to the present four courts only. The Cormdssioners were in egreement that the agreement has worked well in the past, end that it vas rainly Eden irairie residents who benefited by it. Gerens explained the background of the agreement, that it had been expedient for both parties to jointly finance the construction of the courts at a time when neither body had funds. LOTION: Fifield moved to approve the joint agreement between the City and the f School District on the jcint use of he tennis courts as presented. Kruell seconded, motion carried unanimously. • ffi • { iI MEMORANDUM • TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager • FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Service :L SUBJECT: Arbor Month Celebration DATE: April 14; 1978 At the Mar. 21 Council Meeting the Council directed the staff to attempt to develop some sort of celebration for Arbor Day and Arbor Month. The staff felt • it might be appropriate to select a "City Tree" for Eden Prairie, and celebrate Arbor Day with a tree planting ceremony of our new "City Tree" outside of City Hall. Stuart Pox, City Forester, sent a memo to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the Historical and Cultural Commission suggesting a variety of possible trees for a City tree. Both Commissions thought that it was a good idea to endorse a City tree and celebrate Arbor Day with this type of a celebration. The Historical and Cultural Commission recommended the t, selection of both the Red Maple and Sugar Maple as a City tree. The Parks, Recreation and :Natural Resources Commission recommended the Ilackberry as a City tree. If the Council is in agreement with this form of an Arbor Day Celebration, it would be appropriate to select a "City Tree" and to set a time for the tree planting ceremony on Arbor Day. Bl.:md • . IN 3 MEMOiRAN:DUM T0: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission TURD: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services FROM: Stuart A. Fox, City Forester ;m ; SUBJECT: Arbor Month Celebration - Naming City Tree DATE: March 31, 1978 The Minnesota Department of Agriculture is presently sponsoring Arbor Celebration • 1978. This event. is a State effort to encourage citizens to plant trees in their . communities. The month long, statewide celebration will begin April 28, 1978, Arbor • Day, and end May 31, 1978. • With Dutch elm disease and to a lesser degree Oak Wilt disease killing trees in the City, reforestation should be a primary concern in the City. The staff recommends that the Cormrission consider the following ideas as a means of • observing Arbor Day and Arbor Celebration 1978. 1. The City should publicize the event( .) before it occurs. The local paper should cdr y on 1C it dent Arbor" May events, tree pruning and care, tree di<c . , rind timetrer, f^. • ,tang. • 2. Formal nrnclaic.•i:ion of Arbor Day uy the Mayor on April nth in conjunction with the plantings of a tree outside of City Hall. • 3. Selection of a "City Tree" for Eden Prairie. After tel with communities surrounding Eden Prairie the staff learned that very few ciLies have a designated "City Tree Bloomington's tree is the Japanese Tree • • Liliac., Sveinra amureiisis .jT,;nice, which a garden club nominated and was subsequently adopted by the City Council. the City tree of Richfield is the Crab Apple, Males sp. • • • • • Staff suggestions of possible trees. A. Red Maple (Acer r.i'rrum) - a dense foliage tree which has a medium growth • rate and indiu. height. 21i-50 feet. The tree is native to Minnesota but very few are found in Eden Prairie. The tree is available at most nurseries, transplants easily and his few diseases. • B. Sugar Maple (Acer srccharum) - a very hardy native tree reaching a mature height of over LU feet. The growth rate is slow to mod,i aLe. This tree has been tile: ir,sl. popular selection in our reforestaien proarcm for the • lost two years. Avail,ihle at all nurseries and tranplants easily. C. H,ickberry (feltis oci.idwrtalis.) - A native tree suitable for planting under extrrc' crrdil iciness Grot;th rate is, modcirete to rapid with a r:a sure height of over idl feet. the availability of this tree is limited and the teens- planting procedures and time of planting is soaaeimb:! importan:. -2- • D. Green Ash (fraxirrus pensylvanica) and cultivers. Hardy native tree which has a number of cultivers which arc seedless. fast rate of growth with height in excess of 50 feet. This tree was the second most popular select4on in our reforestation program. This tree has excellent availability at local nurseries. E. American linden (Tilia americana) and cultivers. A native tree with large leaves and dense folliaee which is found throuphont the City in conjunction with oat: trees. This tree has a moderate growth rate. The tree is available at most area nurseries and has a wide variety of cutlivers. The staff realizes that endorsement of a tree as a "City Tree" could create a e,onoforest situation in the residential areas. With the potential of a disease similar to Dutch elm disease Tallinn trees in an epidemic manner. Therefore, it is recommended by the staff that ;he Commission r:ould select more than one variety (or others than those listed) es the possible selections for a "City Tree". 9t{)) .. •r I! 11 . . AGRiCULTLIML EXT17..rt..1!ON SF..RVICE . .. '. •,--,. ; 1, c.'., , i ,. ,,..... .„ . „ 11 UNIVItiStlY 011.1WINESCITA ).. i• ),..., I .-:.•,•. ..., / ;, - ' 1•',.. :',i , 4 1 1 • - '''r . .,- . .,...,...,.....-t.,% '•\.,- .:i-,..!.. ,-....,,,,..} `,..••....:-.. ,,,,,,,,,,,,, `,...4,..p.,-a...,,,r,i,-.,,,,,,,... ,,....I.r.,...ter.,..11,4,,C,M.titi-41,,,,X5V111,119serWalidatilar9131,1Unti,IFAFICSialfliV3S11162211.1INTZAVIINTalltPt10464..ma.i.11.9,44, . i-IORTICl.11..TtflE C".-..,,,, ‘''.• 'r. r " /..:"",,. ".":-,o." ..,r... •1*. , FACT,....1;LET No.1.2-titsvisr!d 1977 ,e.),.*,;.....l...1.4t. ; It .? iui 1.iii Di (.-.....C1,..a m.C.MEI Trey:,.i.es.,...sd edinite s'.-rusy In a 1 air ir unity end r 0,1111 I feel- ' arid cut:fully pinned. VI;',11e1 should be provided dut in3 dry ter,'et ii.'do.;,0,1 tr,e.toill.y. "I ii,Itze,,,,•r,,the cool(1,VIM loll- spells et 1-a••.t thre,ills the first two.;growing r.easons, tlialsing age,the in,r,i,the fruit:,tle•hurl:,the 1,:i,nelse..q 1,1,,i.J.rrd the us'is necessur y for trees forgo t.11:::1r,feet or trees lot:ated autumn,..,,,..:(id 1,...;.,...y 1.)via 4111;,`,.,$1,1 il.V11 i, .i lay help in a windswept era. tfilr.ed corn liven roust b:,controlled achieve eorit,nuity ii',la:community t,y tyii,g ,.:•..th,:i vat,ed either by inirIcling or hand hoeirio. A,:mit,i,mulch,or culti- , '• styles of ai chit ecw ie. valet],ii ea or ound the lit:se of the lice will fed!ICfl slit CiterICVS of sditine,ing it wil,11 taws inowers and other equipment. Trees Since Dutch 4,1m ilk,..,,,e..tak'op it toll,I,f linise.,/,ti, rwople • •planted in tx.rks or along l'071(11.4";IVS Wh'SII'Cf.hind is tun grass in towns arid communilre-,al e beconni10 111'0 rt.‘1,11t1 in 0 Pier yhoilld 1,-::p:otected from rodents viith a c.yEnder of ortiten .. trees they c....11 nit nit li,,,,-;,"run tr(.,s fo::,community tod:.y, inch lia:d...va,e dolls. 10 pi Overt sunscald,thin,smooth-barked .. several dif ler Nit l.irrIs t.'.-ioir.,1...;be considered. A rpod plan is to trees;nest 174,WI:kiln:A in the fall for szveral years. The proper ..lig!dif I erent I:inds of NIT,cm dill:,ens streets..Jther lilac a random plz,nting of trosy(1,:‘.. orri kir...1.01 tr:-.,:-.on the 1.,:rile trainierr amd pionire:oi yousin trees will elirnimite many rioters- ... • tisil probleais and t r,duee inainterw.occ costs. StrC1 trees stittt. Va.:p:ty is ile,....1-rs so pi event., iitiati.rit wh,,te a sin:Jle should he pruned to remove lower branches that interfere with tree specks may be injured or killed b,,,il disease or pest. pedeslrian rid vehicular traffic. e Thorn ale a rirn'.,er of;wpm unt comidea rt,Or w tars hen selecting trees. Due Yr q.t.se,•:erity tr:(.•lir clintrte,hl-ditieNs is oi tiff. Most of the trees on the list on the bac%of this fact sheet can ••• mat y imporl.-ee. The m,,,at..elsi• ',1,ivis hat times,/ones its be leers at the Minnesota Landscapir,Arlmeatm at Chaska. Minnesot.7. l.liercdiri:]..,,s,.•.,,ere.in th,t,:irlltry1SS 7.01o..1-in be TREE::I101 SU1TFD FOR STREET TilFES .. more two,i.,.,1•to mthe,..ev,le tivr,it r!oroy-al chin:It,of the iSorat of!hese tr,es il.wy tie use;til for other purposes.) arc.a. 11-a.sc!mist be cm.,id.;,,,ltryhcrs,.-.,-,1cetim,ne,..s. V.'inter •. temr.,-,ratinN,r-,f;en;-,, ,,,,s,-,seve,e in i.,Pm an,!‹,,,,in the tioxisider(At-..,..t ocipndoI--Brittle wood; has boxelder Cups on ......101;;;;.1,..,,,'X.'!-..,`;. ,..,..t;:nkl'll in.';l,,,,,,T.'?!"-P..;li,'0, ;;.. 1,.,11IcII..I'S. .. fliif n,I.1 oil iii she lot and-wimer I)toe bZI.t1,,vi than ino;,,,, SilVt:,1'ilaplf.,.(i,,,er a,c,:1;:g inu I 1)1•-Vicak wood; :hallow roat;', ., fj.•,:tt,.1tioec,..1 CI,cia itt:',,,7111_,11 gets leo 1.3.-g:2. .. Birch(beityL,sop.J-Due to unfavorable conditions,suscepti- Rainfall,wind.end suit tsli.russt he r•,:usisisred. Alrmg th,:!Red •ble to sire-bock arid birch'corers. • fie.,..si Vellev id Nos,tlee,e!,s fd.urreseita twes must l.e tolerant of , Cate.lpd(Catalpa fp,•cios4--;vics5y leaves,flowers,and fruits. .• a high 1111. Eilte.:<Walnut(./,,,,4.-.4.7 Cr,')/),?.a)-(ifsen driori:des early in the .. Th.:tree's ry,:diii 2.:,iit!should I,e eorisrtered when street trees season; nsess.y; slow to leaf c.it in spring. are ClIOSell. 1,:'ICCI Ili;in ef-'s ii,.1 V.'ili not tent qk ow nolv;.11.tiCd Mulberry(t.for,:s.,q44!tita,ica)-I-1 tiit,niessy. space will,.,e...,illaint:,nall,...:Ism.,end clirniri.de tea neces.„ity Poplars(Popc4/4/,;:1;,..)--Stiort-live..1; brittle wood; many get •of remade::trees hcfre:e ti ley r,:,.di mato.it:. Man','tie-vs are too IDIge; satire lis.ye suckering roots. .. being b.uldlly pun,a 1'acorn:':,iti i olio:,•....,o:.nut rjo.,rn to their Black Locust(A'obrnia in.-erldoc,:sia)-Suli,ect to borer dirnact.e; • mature 51,',•1.,l1;IIII,Ill y 1.••••11,p,:-,:lit:(1. It\,cii:lii Ira Italic,if such has suckering;clots. : trees svc:e tr..r..so.rri and tepir,.....ed by smeller ones. Willows(Salix a.••p.)--Vieul:v.00d; Inns numerous Swipe . Elms(111mos.st,p,i--Susceptible to Dlllin elm thsease, some .• If ffetS:fle ifl'Inliril l',IIll..,:fi,lilflny Win'',their matine height have brittle wood. :. th.:nilti Iv 1,71.ow 1.1:e kVi,e!..,6.•111...,tree..stedd tie 1,rmdird Oil the tionie.,,ir.r's limper ty on the Pr,“i a',41t.(...7'till,5,0,4V:IL r, ,. wh,,,,!..az r.),...a it.iNd,:I-.1,1Ittn,.as ti.i..:k tro,n Vie sitetrt -,----+,,, _ •,) ,...,_.,_ .. ,s %011 iwili::11,,e II',!piobli,. ...s. I •e,,..licrd riot ,i ho 1,1,1IDIll;fell _, corners _! I 314,'-`7,,.,.:".---, The zones approximate the where they are litr ely to oh.,tr tel vis.on,ttailic Contfoi ---i. ; ...------.1 I hardiness zones ti ken helm lights and:,!•is.01 q1011 1,;hts, • the plant hat i;ins‘s5 zone .• • Some tre,s1.thl ski,,e....ilks and t.tr eel..with 1.irc....!'ad messy maw.piro.ned by the U.S. 1,61,..,,,,,,.,„,,,,,i 1, ,,,,,,1i,..;,,,i,;,,,,..,,..,•,,In.i..,,,e-i•,.. The f ,'-.- • . 7.4.ne 4A t-1‘..., . 1 p[i )1--,''',-. I: '.. National Arbmettim,Ape • ih,..,t no,h,,,,,,t,,,l)lord',55,ietn!;,.;11,17,tic ,•,,,IS 01!Noe trees r'....-N.......-:•-,......._. cultural Re,earth bawl,', c:111C10,;find ti,:111,1,10 SOW:,lint., ClIecl;II le if)II,',Viilln IIV1 of ‘77.17lit -,-:\l, U.S.DON rtment of Agri- tIntivsi!.,1,it•Ite,5. ISo cer 1...di..I v..1i,Iv,:iiinc,:.0..nit Chit', cuStitie,ill c.uopeidtinn wites.iir..1g is lei.,..xi..I 11,0 i,,:ow‘,.,0,i,irt 1n i. siocr. with tho American I lot ti- inq 1 c,...th,,t i...:,..•i,w ie. "i,,rid,i,,•,',..,,,pi oh.eno.•,...,0 1111111-m I ,.......••:•• ;` cultural Society menu' , ei,th :n,I,,...r.',01p• -.iy,i,,,,,,.ii :.zi. AC ,..,:r‘,;ei,,som : e ; i1;; 0, - -. ,, .. • i! ; 1/1,01!lf tilt:;,,len 11;',..' ..,di,-;,,1,,.,Innwo,,l,,,i 1:-.11,niuirr a ;, -1ff f t;;;;II;•, lit,'.•1,,II.i.,.`,'I•If•1,1 f1;0'....In t\IA!IV!sells,Or W'unit,hi,1;1,1 l•,.i.,'i t,,,I t,ti,r,rive,,ff f.•,,,,,,I1II,'. l 11•I'S ..---------..--......-- ..-........--...--..--.-...... 1,,,,,cl 4...:‘1%••••:•.,‘.1(7,..1 0:11.,7 N xlt,v1.1 woil,of,eirx ir.1.1014141 11111,j 1,••:•1/1t•1-•;,•:,•A,I,h,,.t;a•Ifl OW 0'11t•111-11 IVA.(10:11 t,r.v.•.,/.,,,,,.;:.-It of M..,ti owl it.nr?to,I:ilk;;;,,,,,,,,....tfv,1W.fll stun-.;-,end I;;;;;-;;;;,'1,;;;;;;;,,,,, Ili,U.. I./.•;`,III,n!11 of A.,'-.'1•111/re. li'4...ilti 11.A: .11..1,{,t,;.1”(+1 . Nyi.tdoll,I I Sr.',. n fo :Al v:,i.,thfo.,,,v1v° 1.1 I ,,,in.:ri.,,S,.i',,,,,L.6,14, AI:Ill•••••.14,•.1,,l't.,••, I`V,I,It 1,...1(1).4',4,1Z,,L1,,If-^fj,!!;',I.oul • •;,,I,;;,.,1(1.; l i...e;flrt t,,,p llOtrom,.1 v 1,1,1,WS 10.1*. 1....1•6...wit t,. it. it,e;.11,:•,,il In:v.::cti:li 001::it,1:11,,,,..:,,ii•tv‘v,i;-:i'd, , ,i,,,wia u•',we,eir,1,.401.VI,on 1,4,01,1,P:0 •. 9 11' •. I(P • • TnrEs t (..,,c,,,,,t, Tree He i•elt S!n cad i,te 3, :It. ill 41, P.e•norks --% .— — 1 Not,y tv, c,t,.(A,:rr pi 1;,.,1,),, c) , . , . Al VI M X • VI otect dll toi.,,Its from sunse.a. Cleviliw.kt 1.'0....,-;M,1)1...(Aery p(,..:t10.141 'Cleo 4.11,1) M I M X • Ono of the best maples. Einclidi!011,...1 I:Iwymy ti,I.ito...:(Acer M 47 hi X • Sclw.etli,AS,,,.,ty(.....trh,tili.,.:-,,phl:arold'es ri, W M X • t.+21.111,f:-..!1:.,',,,No;n../,:‘,Y,,V11,. piJI,40 I i".‘L s'5'./wir,,,r.'fr.,.,,,.."1 II W M X • —t• Ilot NI'JO,-(A.c..r rol.,.,/i,) AI A' M . . • • Best on d soi,s. ,,..4,, f'...2,•;:,1(1.-.1,(,i,1 ,(,,w,/,./rin,,) L W &Ai • • • • fiezn,y,',mit:so 1,.-.r eqt:it ed. 0:lit.P.,,C.,‘Vv ji,C.,:;h:,r,g,e'7.4 M IV ;;-M • • 0 It '''''..-1, 1-1`.''i',,'I(C.P,S(.0.':(1.'il( ,,,, L W IA T • • • . finite Cli-sini:t(A,:-top.11,:,,,..or.-..st.-plarr.) L IV M • , fiti....i.)a 01-:, 1!I. '. ,1(1,::11,./1;1 ril/.1). . S-IN M IN T • , • , i".:-...ii'l r:.:!...,,m,ri.:.rit.) L 41 Mr • • • Ni live!oioce woomolenrii,d. -P, G.eel)A'-).fir:,11q,r,...;:y),r,le.-..c IV..r.Owl'S,41.t,-,.(,.,-;4.0-,(TraAinits L W F • • , • • • • StinIinil(qv,.At-it:1-t•I'<ir,...s pen,.yAx,;:a L • W F • • • • fircoi::t than Summit. 1 "S!einf,IJ:1 L W F • • • • - 111.n,i,s;1(i,..xi”,,c ii,..,:,:iedng3h.f.3) . . . M W S X • -, 6,1,,<0 (71,,',.....,bi',!.-.) Al W S X • litip,_:1 1:1 I it,,,,../1.,i-ost(i:ik.dts,, thri.rir4:10.,Is',',.?,.:,:i.?/7 I. IN F X • . . • Skyi;-,e tr,/,.<1.....,t/:,/,::-.7/.1hi,:: .Al' yib)e'l. . L W F X • L,'.,. Xi..",a-ky Coii,:ilice(GI nr'ioa.,.,tn AI L IV S • • Sloa to$,:,....`.nu: frli!-•,?, fl,,, ,••i•,,.,''.:,,,•,,,p,..,,',•.'Ids .... . . S I A' • it • a Hadialil I'It-it,'ilig C,r.io.,Jv,li:(1.:*.4,4 'ii".../•.,1"). S I M lit'd!;i;'$.41.::i,:vak.in '2.,:i..ppIe it.f.ii,'f;•,e:;,,,p.,,b,i S I M • • • • ., ,.. .:id 1 Io•eci'IN)C.,.1-is,i'o S N AI • • . • . lionivood r;.,,q1,1,;',11, ,if 11 I M • • • • ,1 Ailr.u.C.1,i.t, I.1,I..',.,r.:,.•-,f;::::,/vmp„.m..: . ti. W M T • ., Co,-ii:',.,.--,,,,t i,icof.4 . . . L W S-M T • Pin(IA',(0:,c,-/..,::p...:r,,,,.-).-) M I M T • • fleg.iires e(ici:oil. , SjVt.'t.If:,:$I'M 0,1,Wuer/./S;,,•41.,iris .; M I M T • • Ilerittii-cs acid r./il. Sh:-......";I..,,,u,.,..;in;.5,,/,,,.-(:,-.cird). . . . , S I M • • • • Eastern cooilIi,...;only. Protei-t f:et.:son.cold. T,... It-„:i'.'..',..!..,,,,..•ifi,I,10;)!h; •t. Idp,Ill, •A S IV S II • • • ,. 74ny,i...•,11!i:lilr:i i T;ii:,,..,:::.:;:,-11.7) , . . . L 47 M • • • • . Li..I,:.•,;I,,..,,.,(I.:, ...,,,' I./ M W S T T • "(1,4.,,,.;,1,.,...1.,1 1(“1:,‘,...•.:i.-., —112 Al I S T T • (L.1,,.,,,,.,11,1,l_c,,II, iR(T ,z vtic .n......'.1. 'I;-C. ',i . . . . . . . . . . I. I S T T • . III,';-,St ;:ii..1:1 Grt..111 cur •.itx:041.-,,on:.1 S--.i.t.I(l'!,11.,,,,I.,11,11.0 I,/, n.",o,115 it.a..!1..A.I r, CO 1.Via:,1,,,,,, ii.l.st,,,.l•,I,'•••, PI• f,..1.,,r1(..:-.A(.•I) I•.111t,,,,..,1,1c(11a:.!!:/ M..MP(twin X•itvoirw,:...'•(t in sc.ii!“.td 14,1 of scf,,Isinl in I.••I.,,F..•VA,It,0,I over) II'' oei.:t.t:-..11.:,t1;1,,,,irri r-SION no,1`$C1I,Flit 01,,Iii“ottilnht,cird s.•..,S. . : 1 i lqt) i 1 TO: Mayor & City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: John D. Prone, Finance Director DATE: April 14, 1978 RE: Bond Refunding Attached are two schedules for water and sewer bonds. 1.3 is before refunding and 2 is after refunding. The refunding re- j moved a shortfall starting in 1989 and reaching $3,016,000 in r 1993 to one which starts in 1997 and reaches $1,808,000 in 2001. The charges incurred in connection with the refunding were $125,000 for financial consultants and $66,800 for other services. . JDF:bq 4/14//8 i .t • EXHIBIT 1 .3 • 1/31/73 EIDE:N iRA.1 PIE WATER AND E;E_0JI.:.E1 DEBT SERVICE SINE 1.NG FUND E'R0 FORMA CASH FLOW IlIVESTMENT DEBT SERVICE YEAR ENO' YEAR REVENUES (1) EARNINGS (2) ALL BONDS (3) BALANCE BEGINNING BALANCE 2900000 1978 1.827164 1.99053 •1369849 .3556368 1979 1773710 2441.06 1.946615 3627569 1980 1.720257 24899 3 1975355 3621464 19E31. 1666804 240574 1990 061 3546781 19E12 16 0265E 24344E3 1961.659 34.31228 1983 1353500 235516 1E390381 3129863 19E14 1316627 214.831 20 05631 2655690 1985 1279754 .102284 2008287 2109441 1986 1242831. 11+4 790 1945547 1551.565 1987 1206008 1061+98 1994140 869931. 1938 1163859 59711. 1.93041.6 15508 1989 1129431 10645 1860829 — 565668(4) 1990 027E347 0 1762518 — 1500339 L9N1 81.2427 0 1.522333 — 2210245 1992 797006 0 1.351735 — 2764974 1993 595'S72 0 846828 — 30:1.6230 1994 52893'6 0 41.711E3 — 2904.360 1995 401.6,01. 0 15I.063 — 2653822 1996 350000 0 .. . . — 21+53070 1997 362000 0 14+7218 — 223828E 1998 374000 0 1.15775 — 1980063 1999 386000 0 0 — 1591+063 20)10 398000 0 0 — 11.96063 2001 41.0000 0 0 — 786063 2002 422000 0 0 — 364063 2003 4.34000 0 0 69937 • • 2004 4 460 00 4800 0 520737 2005 4581100 35743 0 1014480 • 2o06 470000 69633 0 1.55111.13 2007 482000 106673 0 2142786 20413 49 4000 1.47079 0 2783865 2009 506000 :191082 0 3480947 2010 518000 2333929 0 4237876 (1) Includes 1 mill levy collectible in 1978 and $900,000 delinquent assessments at 6%, per year. (2) Earnings are at 6% annual rate compounded semiannually on previous year's balance. (3) Refunded and nonrefunded Section 444.075 bonds. (4) Deficits cannot cumulate in actual practice, but the cumulative figures are valid in comparing refundings. gq9 EXHIBIT 2 4/14/78 EDEN PRAIRIE WATER AND SEWER DEBT SERVICE SINKING FUND PRO FORM CASH FLOW INVESTMENT DEBT SERVICE YEAR END YEAR REVENUES EARNINGS ALL BONDS BALANCE BEGINNING BALANCE 2480000 ' 1978 1627164 176636 1575061 2908741 1979 1773710 207175 1664868 3224758 1980 1720257 229683 1716763 3457936 1981 1666804 246292 1684398 3686634 ,J 1982 1602658 262581 1636623 3915250 1983 1353500 278864 1613538 3934076 1984 1316627 280205 1598040 3932868 1985 1279754 280119 1561475 3931266 ' 1986 1242681. 280004 1448815 4005336 1987 1206003 285280 1601153 3895472 1988 1163859 277455 15574403 3779383 1989 1129431 269187 1492825 3685176 1990 827847 262477 1443585 3331914 1991 812427 237316 1768318 2613339 1992 797006 186135 1653890 1942590 1993 595572 138361 1123303 1553221 1994 528988 110628 91144.3 1281394+ 1995 401601 91267 933773 840490 j 1996 350000 59864 953098 297257 1997 362000 21172 939538 - 259109 1998 374.000 0 904900 - 790009 1999 386000 0 755000 - 1159009 2000 390000 0 720875 - 1481884 , 2001 410000 0 736750 - 1808634 2002 422000 0 0 - 1386634 2003 434000 0 0 - 952634 2004 446000 0 0 - 506634 2005 458000 0 0 - 48634 2006 470000 0 0 421366 2007 482000 30012 0 933378 2000 494000 66480 0 1493858 2009 506000 106400 0 2106258 2010 518000 150018 0 2774276