The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 10/04/1977 JOHN FRANE • EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNC TUESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Marty Jessen; Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES OF THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, Page 5590 SEPTEMBER 6, 1977 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 1977 Special Assessment Hearing (Resolution No. 77-122) - (Continued Page 5604 from 9/20/77) B. Garrido Forest 2nd Addition. The Preserve, request to rezone Pages 5474 & trom Rural to R1-13.5 and_arel;i:duary plat—Mots on approximately 5550 25 acres. The site is located in the southwest corner of County Road 18 and Amsden Road (Ordinance No. 77-33 and Resolution No. 77- 118) -(Continued from 9/20/77) C. 1978 City Budget (Resolution No. 77-130) -(Continued from Page 5605 9/20/77) • D. Crosstown Industrial Park by Frank Cardarelle, request to rezone_ Page 5608 and preliminary plat 12 acres into 3 lots and rezone from Rural to 1-2 Park. The site is located east and north of the Prairie View Motel. (Ordinance No. 77-34 and Resolution No. 77-129) IV. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Resort from Richard Anderson, Chairman of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission on the followi g : 1. Cash Park Fee Policy/Land Dedication re pirements Page 5621 2. Fden ate Markum Properties and Purgatory Plan Page 5627 3. Discussion on reaffirming the City's policy on liquor store Page 5632 ! profits V. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Readini_of Ordinance No. 77-32, renaming Garrison Way to Amsden Page 5406 Way (Continued ffrom 9/20/77) Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,October 4, 1977 V. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS (continued) B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-19, Norseman Industrial Park, Pages 5347, rezoning 16 acres from Rural to 1-2 Park,pre ii nary plat approval, 5496 & and rezoning agreement 5633 C. Resolution No. 77-133, amendment of Lease and Guaranty Agreement Page 5635 for Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Physical Electronics Industries, Inc.). VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Appointment of 2 members to the Development Commission (1 term to expire 2/28/78, and 1 term to expire 2/28/79) B. Report of City Manager 1. Award bids for City Hall expansion Page 5642 2. Request to set a Public Hearing for Olympic Hills 3rd & Page 5643 4th Additions by Olympic Hills Corporation and Michael Adams 3. Dickey/Kodet/Architects - Concept design for fire stations Page 5644 C. Report of City Attorn_y. 1. Dorenkemper Lawsuit D. Report of Planning Director 1. Revised site plan for Edenvale Covenience Center at Valley Page 5646 View Road and Mitchell Road C. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Tennis Court Funding Page 5651 2. 1977 Forestry Program - determination of subsidies Page 5652 r. Report of City Engineer 1. Final plat approval for Woodland Addition (Resolution No. 77-131) Page 5656 2. Resolution to apportion MSA Funds to TH 169 Improvements Page 5659 tResolution No. 77-132) Report of Finance Director 1. Clerk's License List Page 5660 2.. Pynnent of Claims Nos. 6994 - 7126 Page 5661 VII. NiW ROSINESS V I I I. ADJOURNMENT. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council 1 FROM: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager 4r/I SUBJECT: Council Agenda for Tuesday, October 4, 1977 DATE: September 30, 1977 II. Correct, approve and file minutes of Council meeting held Tuesday, September 6, 1977. III. A. We have made the adjustments to the Assessment Roll as directed at the Public Hearing of September 20th. Mr. Jullie has outlined those adjustments affecting the Assessment Roll and we recommend the Council consider approving Resolution No. 77-122. III. B. I have been advised by Mr. Bale representing The Preserve, they will withdraw their • request of the City to consider any realignment of Anderson Lakes Parkway. Mr. Bale will be presenting a plat for Garrison Forest 2nd Addition in compliance with the Planning Commission recommendation. I would have to assume that in addition to the Garrison Forest 2nd Addition, Mr. Bale will also request the Council if they might consider reopening the hearing on the Amsden plat which is contiguous to the Garrison Forest 2nd Addition. Mr. Bale will be present to outline their proposal and answer any questions you may have. III. C. I have enclosed a draft Resolution No. 77-130 showing the necessary monies that have to be levied for the year 1978. These figures represent a 17.2 mill levy based on an 82 million dollar assessed valuation. I have also included a forestry budget breakdown on how the $177,000.00 of City funds would provide pick up and disposal, identification and reforestation. As I previously stated, the 17.2 mills is a 1 mill increase above the 1977 levy. • III. D. Notices have been sent to the adjacent property owners. The proponent has appeared before the Planning Commission and their recommendation is for the Council to consider approval of the request. The proponent, Fir. Cardarelle, will be present to outline • his proposal and answer any questions you may have. If the Council were to consider ' approval, a first reading of Ordinance No. 77-34 and approval of Resolution No. 77-129 would be in order. Also direct the City Attorney to draft a rezoning agreement prior to the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-34. • IV. A. Mr. Richard Anderson, Chairman of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources I, 2, & Commission, would like to present and review with you their recommended proposals 3 on the cash fee policy, Edengate/Markum properties, and liquor store profits. • V. A. If the Council approves the Garrison Forest 2nd Addition request for rezoning and _ . preliminary plat approval, I would also reconmend that you consider renaming Garrison Way to Amsden Way by adopting the 1st reading of Ordinance No. 77-32. :xS Mayor and City Council - 2 - September 30, 1977 V. B. You will note by the enclosed information that we have had two meetings with the majority of property owners in the Lake Smetana area. I had hoped we could come to some understanding as a result of these meetings. This has not been accomplished. Mr. Helte is still opposed to the north-south route being located as outlined at our previous meeting. Mr. Perbix and myself will meet one more time with Mr. Helle's attorney in an effort to settle the differences on Monday, October 3. Any additional information will be presented to you either by Mr. Perbix or myself Tuesday evening. • V. C. You will note by the enclosed request that an amendment is necessary to the original Lease and Guaranty Agreement. Mr. Perbix has reviewed this request and s has stated their request is reasonable and recommends approval. Mr. Perbix will answer any questions that you may have relative to this request Tuesday evening. 1 VI. B.I We have received bids on September 28th and have enclosed the tabulations for your review. The low responsible bidder id each category are as follows: ; General Contractor: Kranz Construction Co. $135,290 i Mechanical Contractor: Grendahl $ 32,625 Electrical Contractor: Medina Electric $ 15,970 i Total Amount $183,885 ti It is possible to reduce this amount by approximately $20,000 by accepting the alternate bids which would eliminate the party walls, partitions, and some mechanical wA rk.. I believe that the bids are reasonable and will provide us with a facility, in my opinion, to accommodate any increase in personnel Lc) a point-in-time that the City reaches some 30,000 to 40,000 population. I have also included a proposed financing schedule where we could appropriate $50,000 from the General Fund and obtain an inhouse loan from our Utility Operating • Fund for a period of five years on a pay-back schedule of $38,000 per year. • I would recommend that the Council consider awarding bids to the low responsible bidders. VI. 6.2 Request that the Council consider setting November 1 as a date for Public Hearing for Olympic Hills 3rd and 4th Additions. VI. 6.3 The Public Safety Department and the Dickey/Kodet Architectural firm have requested to appear before the Council to review the concept design for the fire stations. I am enclosing their request; however, I have not had an opportunity to review the concept design at this time. I am going to meet with the Public Safety Department and architects on Monday. In the event that I feel the concept plan does not meet our basic requirements, I may ask the Council to continue this item to the next regular meeting. VI. C.1 The City and the previous City Manager, Mr. George Hite, have been served a Summons and Complaint by the attorney for Mr. Dorenkemper. Mr. Perbix would like to briefly review the Summons and Complaint with you and clarify the policy of the City in a matter of this type. VI. D.1 Mr. Peterson of Edenvale has presented his Covenience Center for site plan approval to the Planning Commission and they have recommended approval. Mr. Peterson will be present Tuesday evening to answer any questions the Council may have. Maypr and City Council - 3 - September 30, 1977 VI. El The City has received approval of a grant request of $11,000 for tennis courts at Forest Hills School Park. We would request you approve this request as per the memo attached. VI. E.2 I have enclosed our memo of August 12, 1977 outlining subsidies granted in accordance with State Statutes. You will notice that on page 5655 we estimated that we will have approximately $19,940 remaining in the forestry budget. You will notice that no subsidy has been providid to property owners over 5 acres. We feel that some token subsidy should be provided to these properties and would appreciate reviewing this with you Tuesday evening. VI. F.1 Recommend approval of Resolution No. 77-131 as per Mr. Jullie's memo. VI. F.2 Recommend approval of Resolution No. 77-132 as per Mr. Jullie's memo. VI. G.1 You will notice that Dr. Anonsen has requested a private kennel license. Based on th( Ordinance requirements it appears that Or. Anonsen is short of the area requirements. The proponent is aware of this and will be present Tuesday evening to present his case to you. It appears that there are some residents in the area who might be opposed to this request. VI. G.2 Recommend approval of Payment of Claims Nos. 6994 - 7126. RKU:jp £S UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Marty Jessen, and Recording Secretary Joyce Provo INVOCATION: Councilwoman Joan Meyers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Bye, Meyers, Osterholt and Penzel present; Pauly absent. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were requested to be added to the Council agenda under the "New Business" category: A. Communication from Councilman Bye to School Board Chairman Paul Enblom. B. Wolf property owned by Fraser School C. Discussion of seven-member Council and limitation of Council members terms MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES OF THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1977 Pg. 2, para. 6, 1st line after "fee" insert "versus land dedication" Pg. 7, 10th para., 4th line, strike "a permanent" and insert in lieu thereof "an extended", and in the 5th line after "lease" insert "from three to five years". Pg. 8, 2nd para., change Osterholt's vote to "nay". MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes of the Regularly Scheduled Council Meeting held Tuesday, August 2, 1977, as amended and published. Bye, Osterholt and Penzel voted "aye", Meyers "abstained". Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING HELD FRIDAY, AUGUST 5, 1977 MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the minutes of the Special Council Meeting held Friday, August 5, 1977, as published. Osterholt, Meyers and Penzel voted 'aye' , Bye "abstained'. Motion carried. 55.90 Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,September 6, 1977 • III. PRESENTATION BY DON OPHEIM REGARDING THE EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER FUND RAISING CAMPAIGN Don Opheim thanked the Council and Staff for their interest in the Eden Prairie Community Center fund raising campaign. He further stated he would come back to the Council with a complete proposal at a later time. Brochures were distributed to Council members. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. T.H. 169 improvements at Junction County Highway 1 and at the South • .Hennepin Vo-Tech School entrances, S.P. 2744-28 and 2744-31 • Al Pint, Project Manager for the Minnesota Department of Transportation, conducted the Public Hearing and explained that an official transcript of this hearing will be completed and made available to the public. (Information attached which was distributed by the Minnesota Department r; of Transportation for this meeting and the transcript of this meeting will become a permanent part of the record when completed). i MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, that Council urge the 1 Minnesota Department of Transportation to seriously consider the temporary .I installation of signals at T.H. 169 and County Highway land at the I South Hennepin Vo-Tech School entrance until such time as the permanent - project is completed. Motion carried unanimously. g I MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to close the Public Hearing. 4. Motion carried unanimously. >( B. Maple Leaf Acres 3rd Addition by Jarip Corporation, request for PUD Concept 1 Approval, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for approximately 62 acres and from Rural to C-Commercial for approximately 1.3 acres, and preliminary plat approval for 141 lots (Continued Public Hearing from August 16, 1977) a City Manager Ulstad spoke to concerns expressed by the Council at the August 16th Council meeting: 1) Proposed commercial site; 2) Dell Road and intersection , of Duck Lake Trail; 3) question of park dedication and/or cash park fee in i lieu of land, and 4) trail system as it relates to the development. He further 3 explained that the proponents are prepared to address the first two items. Dennis Griswold, D. R. Griswold & Associates, Project Landscape Architect, stated that the 1.3 acre area previously proposed for Commercial use located at the intersection of Dell Road and Valley View Road has been revised to a Residential use including three single family lots,and that each of the three lots will have ample area to accommodate a T-type driveway to eliminate the necessity of backing onto Valley View Road. Mr. Griswold also highlighted the staging phases of the road system. Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to the location of trails through the proposed development, noting that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission merely spoke to the trails along the major roadways and really haven't pinpointed which side of the street the trails will be located. City Engineer Jullie answered questions of Council members regarding the drainage system in the proposed development. • 659 I Council Minutes - 3 -. Tues.,September 6, 1977 B. Maple Leaf Acres 3rd Addition by Jarip Corporation (continued) 4 Mr. Glisczinski, 7152 Ticonderoga, questioned how the parks would be paid for. Jessen explained the cash park fee is at a rate of $275.00 per lot and would be collected from 144 lots. There are other vacant lands within the `: service area and the fee would be assessed against those as well and would be { applied against the purchase. Mrs. Glisczinski,.7152 Ticonderoga, expressed her fear of Valley View Road becoming a through street for general traffic and construction traffic. City Engineer Jullie responded that none of the streets in the proposed Maple Leaf Acres project would connect to the Hidden Ponds 1st Addition until there is a connection of Valley View Road to County Road 4. Mr. Romsos, 7138 Ticonderoga, asked the proponent if they considered potential trail locations in the proposal. 'Mr. Irvine responded they have included a trail along Valley View, Duck Lake Trail, and Dell Road. Al Herzog, 17141 South Shore Lane, explained that he does not live in the area, but can see things beginning to have an impact in his area. He further questioned the idea of bringing Valley View to Duck Lake Road north to the Railroad Tracks and if there is any right-of-way available for that right now. City Engineer Jullie stated there is a corridor of right-of-way that the Bren Road follows, however, it is in private ownership and would have to be acquired. Both Mr. & Mrs. Irvine answered questions of Council members. `;' MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to close the Public Hearing and give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 77-2B, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 1 for approximately 66.6 acres consisting of 144 lots, Maple Leaf Acres, 3rd Addition by Jarip Corporation. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 77-97, approving the Preliminary Plat for Maple Leaf Acres 3rd Addition, requesting that the developer define the alignments of Duck Lake Trail and Dell Road, and that Valley View Road not be extended beyond this development until final determination as to the ultimate connection of Valley View Road from Hidden Ponds East to County Road 4. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to direct the City Attorney to • draft a rezoning agreement to include the following: 1. Trails be clearly defined. 2. Valley View Road not be extended beyond this development until final determination as to the ultimate connection of Valley View Road from Hidden Ponds East to County Road 4. 3. Include recommendations of the Planning Commission from meeting held July 11, 1977. 4. Cash park fee. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to instruct staff and the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to investigate the options for other lands to be used for public park purposes. Motion carried unanimously. 569 Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,September 6, 1977 C. Garrison Forest 2nd Addition by The Preserve, request to rezone from Rural to R1-13.5 and preliminary plat 43 lots on approximately 25 acres. The site is located in the SW corner of County Road 18 and Amsden Road. (Ordinance No. 77-33; Resolution No. 77-118) City Manager Ulstad explained that the proponent has requested that this Public Hearing be continued to September 20, 1977. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue the Public Hearing for Garrison Forest 2nd Addition by The Preserve to the September 20, 1977 ' Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS No reports. • VI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Communication from Donald F. Pennie, President of the Board of Managers for Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District dated August 10, 1977 '•, Director of Commununity Services Jessen reported on the recent Riley Purgatory Watershed District meeting regarding the updating of the Watershed District's rules and regulations. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, that staff communicate to the President of the Board of Managers of the Riley Purgatory Watershed District our concurrence that they take cne initiative in requiring performance bonds and suggest they write these into their Rules and Regulations. Motion carried unanimously. B. Communication from Richard Hagstromz Legal Counsel for Herleiv Helle, requesting Council's consideration of Mr. Helle's proposed rezoning • and proposed plat (Communication dated 9/2/77) City Manager Ulstad explained the City staff would like to meet with the property owners in this specific area, that being the area abutting Washington Avenue, #169 and #5, and all the way to #494. In the past the City has recognized the Hennepin County Systems Plan for the extension of County roads as it affects Eden Prairie. About two weeks ago Mr. Ulstad met with Herb Klossner, Hennepin County Engineer, for the sole purpose of discussing the Systems Study and what part Eden Prairie would play in that development. Klossner did outline to Mr. Ulstad that the County was not able to offer any assistance for construction and acquisition for the Shady Oak Road extension; however, they would accept the road if built to their specifications. Ulstad further stated that the alignments as outlined by the County would be difficult to achieve. The City staff has visited with a couple of property owners in the area relative to interior road alignments to serve the property. Ulstad explained that Staff is trying to set a meeting next week to visit with a number of property owners in the area and hopefully by October 4th we could have a recommendation. Mr. Ulstad stated the reason this item has been placed on the agenda is that the City has received a communication from tir. Hagstrom along with the telephone call requesting that this item be placed on the Council agenda this evening. • 0 2; council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,September 6, 1977 B. Commnunication from Richard Hagstrom, Legal Counsel for Herleiv Helle (continued) David Gronbeck, Legal Counsel for Mr. Helle, explained that the plan Mr. Helle has presented divides 16 acres into 4 lots and it is his client's position that the City is asking Mr. Helle to dedicate 40 feet of road to serve needs of other people, not Mr. Helle's project. Mr. Gronbeck asked the Council to reconsider their requirements and that Mr. Helle not be required to dedicate 40 feet for road purposes along the westerly line of the 16 acres. City Attorney Perbix stated that it was about a week ago Mr. Berg, Mr. Helle, and Mr: Perbix met and discussed the problem Mr. Gronbeck has referred to and at that time there were really three things involved in the Helle property: 1) dedication of street right-of-way along the southerly portion of this tract of ground, 2) holding open for a possible acquisition the western 40 feet of Mr. Helle's 16 acre parcel, and 3) park dedication. At that time Mr. Perbix indicated that it was agreed among the City Staff that it was very important that we try to get the people involved in the area to discuss the road alignments. Mr. Perbix referred to letter just received from Mr. Berg today. Osterholt suggested that since Mr. Perbix has just received the correspondence from Mr. Berg today, and since it is the first time the Council has seen a copy of same, that the Council have an opportunity to review the letter and refer back to Staff and City Attorney for a report to be placed on the October 4th Council Agenda. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to refer this matter to Staff and City Attorney for a report, and this item be placed on the October 4, 1977 Council agenda. Motion carried unanimously. 1 Mr. Herleiv Helle stated that 4 1/2 years ago the Condor Corporation asked for rezoning and that created the longest study that has ever taken place, and as of this date nothing has been rezoned. Sigmond Helle, son of the proponent, explained that this area has been under study for 4 - 5 years and there have been a number of studies. He further stated that there has also been an independent engineer's study. I. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-32, renaming Garrison Way to Amsden MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to continue the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-32 to September 20, 1977. Motion carried unanimously. B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 351, Poolside Apartments, The Preserve, rezoning the 6.39 acre site to RM-2-1-5 and approximately 1.6 acres to RM 6.5 • for the construction of 84 apartment units and the maximum of 8 double bungalow units, and rezoning agreement Osterholt stated that nowhere has anyone shown him when a policy was adopted to specifically exclude The Preserve from the payment of the cash park fee, and he would like this more clearly defined. 5 ti 'uuncil Minutes - 6 - Tues.,September 6, 1977 B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 351, Poolside Apartments, The Preserve (continued) William Bale, Legal Counsel for The Preserve, explained that The Preserve has purchased the financing for this project and has spent about $75,000 to arrange the financing. He further stated that this project is up close to The Preserve Center and this is where a project of this type would be appreciated. Mr. Bale said that The Preserve does want to be responsible in their park dedication and does want to work with the Council to get this matter resolved to the Council's satisfaction. MOTION:• Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 351, rezoning the 6.39 acre site to RM 2.5 and approximately 1.6 acres to RM 6.5 for the construction of 84 apartment units and the maximum of 8 double bungalow units for The Preserve's Poolside Apartments. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the rezoning agreement,incorporating the Staff Site Review Report dated August 4, 1977 into the agreement. Motion carried unanimously. VIII.REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Mayor Penzel spoke to the invitation from Methodist Hospital for Friday, September 9, 1977, 10:30 AM in the third floor Conference Room at the St. Louis Park City Hall to discuss Hennepin County support for advanced life support services. The Council requested_ that a.member of the City Staff attend this meeting. 2. Mayor Penzel referred to the invitation to the Hopkins School meeting to be held Thursday, September 15, 1977 at 7:00 PM in the Board Room at Eisenhower High School. Councilman Osterholt volunteered to attend this meeting. 1 B. Report of City Attorney. No report. C. Report of City Manager 1. Receive and award bids for 2 pumpers and 1 aerial ladder truck City Manager Ulstad spoke to memo from Public Safety Director Hacking dated September 1, 1977. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to award the bid for two 1250 Fire truck pumpers to General Safety Equipment Company for the total price of $143,084.00, as outlined in memos from Public Safety Director Hacking dated August 31, 1977 and September 1, 1977. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Bye, Meyers and Penzel voted "aye". Motion-carried unanimously. Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,September 6, 1977 1. Receive and award bids for 2 pumpers and 1 aerial ladder truck (continued) MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to award the bid for one 100 foot Aerial tower fire pumper to Sutphen Corporation for the total price of $208,950.00 as outlined in memos from Public Safety Director Hacking dated August 31, 1977 and September 1, 1977. Roll Call Vote: Meyers, Osterholt, Bye and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 2. Plans, specifications and bid documents for City Hall expansion City Engineer Jullie spoke to the plans, specifications and bid documents for the City Hall expansion. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to receive bids on September 28, 1977 and to be considered by the Council on October 4, 1977. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Request to set a Public Hearing to rezone certain properties to the Planned Study District MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to set a Public Hearing for October 18, 1977 to consider rezoning certain properties to the Planned Study District. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Request to set a Public Hearing for Crosstown Industrial Park MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to set a Public Hearing for October 4, 1977 to consider the Crosstown Industrial Park. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Preliminary 1978 City Budget 11 MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to set Monday, September 12, 1977, 7:00 PM in the City Manager's Office, to consider the 1978 City Budget and whatever other business may come before the Council. Motion carried unanimously. U. Report of Planning Director 1. Report on #212 Corridor meeting held Tuesday, August 23, 1977 City Manager Ulstad reported on the #212 Corridor meeting held Tuesday, August 23, 1977, which was attended by Councilwoman Pauly and Planner Putnam. C. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Tree Disease Program (continued from August 16, 1977) Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to memo dated August 12, 1977, and answered questions of Council members. • 5596 Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,September 6, 1977 1. Tree Disease Program (continued) Elaine Jacques, 9021 Riley Lake Road, commented that she believes the Legislature is not anticipating larger acreages being inspected and that it is harder to remove trees from the woods than out in the open. Jessen replied that the Legislature has mandated enforcement by all communities without respect to acreage. Joe Dolejsi, 9005 Riley Lake Road, stated that if pepple under 5 • acres receive a subsidy, than people over 5 acres should receive an equal subsidy. Gene Jacobson, 7274 Topview Road, explained that he would not feel bad if the City would not grant a subsidy, but would favor reforestation. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the reforestation program as outlined in memo dated July 1, 1977, and defer any action on subsidies until total budget is reviewed. Motion carried unanimously. • 2. 1978 Grant Application MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the 1978 Grant Application as outlined in Staff Report dated September 2, 1977. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Park Maintenance Equipment Osterholt requested an inventory of present equipment before considering additional park maintenance equipment. This item was continued to the September 20, 1977 Council meeting. F. Report of City Engineer 1. Consider bids for Scenic Heights Road Improvements, I.C. 51-270 (Resolution No. 77-119) City Engineer Jullie explained that six bids were received and the lowest bidder was McNamara-Vivant Contracting Company. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 77-119, accepting the bid of McNamara-Vivant Contracting Company in the amount of $302,517.50 for Scenic Heights Road Improvements, I.C. 51-270. Roll Call Vote: Bye, Meyers, Osterholt and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 2. Land division request from W. F. Riegert, 16404 Easy Street City Engineer Jullie spoke to his memo dated September 1, 1977 and recommended approval of the land division request for W. F. Riegert, 16404 Easy Street. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to grant the land division request for W. F. Riegert, 16404 Easy Street, subject to conditions outlined in City Engineer's memo dated September 1, 1977. Motion carried unanimously. 559? Council Minutes - 9 - Tues.,September 6, 1977 3. Final plat approval for High Point 3rd Addition (Poolside r Apartments) MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 77-113, approving the final plat for High Point 3rd Addition. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Change Order No. 1 for Preserve Boulevard Improvements, I. C. 51-282 • MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve Change Order No. 1 for Preserve Boulevard Improvements. Motion carried unanimously. • G. Report of Finance Director • 1. Audit Report Greg Murphy of the George Hansen firm, and Finance Director Frane, answered questions of Council members pertaining to the 1976 Audit Report. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to receive and file the 1976 Audit Report. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Clerk's License List • • MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the Clerk's License List dated September 6, 1977. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Payment of Claims Nos. 6639 - 6885 MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to approve Payment of Claims Nos. 6639 - 6885. Roll Call Vote: Meyers, Bye,Osterholt and Penzel • voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS A. Communication from Councilman Bye to School Board Chairman Paul Enblom General discussion took place among Council members regarding the upcoming School Bond Referendum to be held October 4, 1977. B. Wolf property owned by Fraser School Councilman Bye stated that he has had conversations with Gertrude Suel, member of the Metropolitan Airports Comission, relative to their interest in the acquisition of the Wolf property. • MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to invite Gertrude Suel to appear before the Development Commission to review her concerns relative to the importance of the acquisition of the Wolf property by the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Motion carried unanimously. �59Z ncil Minutes - 10 - Tues.,September 6, 1977 C. Discussion of seven-member Council and limitation of Council members terms Not discussed. X. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to adjourn the Council meeting at 11:55 PM. Motion carried unanimously. 65-99 Reid 9/ h7 COMBINED LOCATION/DESIGN HEARING HANDOUT • For the following projects on Trunk Highway 169 in the city of Eden Prairie, Hennepin.County: 1. State Project 2744-28 at the intersection of C.S.A.H. 1 and T.H. 169 consists of the relocation of C.S.A.H. 1, signalization, channcliza- tion, lighting and turn lanes. The approximate cost of this project is $610,000. It is scheduled for a Fall of 1979 letting. 2. State Project 2744-31 on T.H. 169 at the entrance to South Hennepin County Vo-Tec School consists of channolizstion and signalization. The approximate cost of this project is $400,000. It is scheduled for a Fall of 1979 letting. j It is anticipated that 70 Percent of the cost of these two projects 1,111 be financed by federal fuses with the remaining su percont financed by state, county, and city funds. These projects will need the approval of the city council of Eden Prairie and the Hennepin County Hoard. INTENT OF THIS H7.?,1rX1,76 It is the intent and desire of the liinncscta Department of Tranoportati.on in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration, to provide a scans through which all interested parties may have an opportunity to be fully informed of proposed highway location and des in features; effects to adjacent landowners; the economic, social and environmental impacts to the community; and to obtain cements from the Street:ed individuals and agencies. The combined public hearing is in accordance with Title 23 Section 128 of United Str.tes Code and with the Federal Highway Administration PPH 20-8 which was issued to ensure "That hig'w'ay lortions and designs reflect and are consistent with Federal, State and local seals and objectivee,.....nd... provides medium of free and open dissuasion and to encourage early and amicable resolutions of controversial issues that: may arise." • 5Ga SUBMISSION OF MATERIAL FOR THE OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT An official transcript will he made of this hearing. Written statements in addition to, or inplace of oral statements at tonights hearing will be accepted and included in the official transcript of this hearing. All correspondence submitted must be postmarked no later than September 16, 1977, and can be addressed to Mr. W. M. Crawford, District 5 District Director. Use the address at the end of this handout. AVAILABLE IFORMATION FOR PUBLIC VIEWING Within two months after the hearing, a copy of the transcript will be submitted to the Division Engineer of the Federal Highway Administration. All informa- tion developed in support of the proposed project will be available upon request for public inspection and copying at tt.a Golden Valley Dictriat He gearters prior to any decisions on approval by the Federal Highway Administration. Also, copies of, or reference to, or photo;rep.hs of each statement or exhibit used or filed in connection with this rablic hearing will be available for public inspection and copying not later than the date the transcript is submitted to the Division Engineer. • ' I 66,00 • RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION Necessary right of way for the highway improvement at C.S.A.H. 1 will be acquired as a joint venture by Mn/DOT and Hennepin County. • The right of way acquisition for the relocated Vo-Tech entrance will be acquired by Mn/DOT. There are no structures located on the lands to be acquired as highway right of way. The right of way will be acquired in accordance with the 1970 Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act passed by Congress, and the 1971 State Relocation Asci.st.ance Law. Right of way acquisition will not begin until we have received Design Approval from the Federal Highway Administration. Hearing Conducted by; Minnesota Dapart ont cf Transportation District 5 Headquarters 2055 North Lilac Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 5592E • • 5601 ' .. ..,...1,..,->- 1••• C.1,., .1 • ty •c), ' .1/. .., . _ ,' • •-•-.7,90 , ••••. ,i., -. •' •:.. •ry ? \,..,--,--=-. .‘?•• ,r tit,. , Q el c \..,, \.(z....k.,) • ' L..1, -C. , D e II:: , ,'\. , • s...,• , sr 4, ‘t i: < 2 ; . „ / . Z 1 1; . . ...• . ; . a_ blool f .• .. t . 1 -7 0 . i I / 1 1 , L.1.1 0 • 0 -- ii LLI W LL 2 •I' --'7.' . I I 7 1 ....•.. I:: <•:,, •' 1"-- •T.. .. ii • 0 filiC11°11111 "111 8--- NI:i t. . . ..,;. ''i 1-- • a- 0 1-- 8 rt- is s, &k o e Z . ..._ i • 0 o a. : (..) .9. ...71- •.\ .\ w . a •1 ----_) .' I- 4 1 • CO ;•__ I• . c..."t',• 4:::C 0 •••• I 0 I I 3 ,0 \.3 . . tor F., n I. *. (0 ; ,., _..i . 11. ,...v....• , 0 CI: 0411... • ' !! •. 'i Y •LT I • 1„....: • .1 1!) (f 1' •. . . ._ • I , , •1 . II . . , HVr as Jeva 3 n' 1 LUL I. ,1 ta (1)i � A ii ,..., ct 1 \ r ....... , ci) 0 n n CO r ,:,- , ,, i, .... II , Z 6,i I , D� w N Vj gym" ` a: Ei V n. 0s L-- J 7,:___,....._______r____ .,,,, ,,„,,„ :,,,, I.I ix 1 1 i�. ' a m 2 I o ! ' c W I i W a a� (g ff 1 -- -- A O ANNf1S y i it` � _ 16 --- �i :/ �l / `"'t Its (44 0 [110 ‘\ 4(t. (7,..., i , /4; • MEMO f"": TO: Mayor Fenzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulsted, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: 9/30/77 • SUBJECT: 1977 Special Assessments Resolution No. 77-122 • We have made the following changes in the draft of Resolution No. 77-122 regarding the 1977 Special Assessments: 1. Mr. James Carter, 15901 North Lund Drive, submitted a letter and documentation regarding poor soil conditions on Lot 10, Block 2, Eden View 2nd Addition (Plat 56856, Parcel 3800). The deferred assessment against this lot is $4,545.31 for trunk and lateral sewer and water. Based on the soil boring report, we recommend that the deferred assessment be dropped and that the assessment card for this lot will indicate that trunk and lateral assessments will be due at the prevailing rates, if and when this lot is ever - developed. 2. Under I.C. 51-289 (Timber Lakes) we have added the cost of the lift station ($45,570) less its salvage value ($22,785) to the trunk assessment for the parcels involved. CJJ:kh • 56011 • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 77-130 A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING 1977 TAX LEVY, COLLECTABLE IN 1978 BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Eden • Prairie, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectable in 1978, upon the taxable property in said City of Eden Prairie for the followingr purposes: General Fund $1,111,200 Fire Relief 1,900 Bonds and Interest 1968 Park & Building Bonds 90,000 1971 G.O. Water and Sewer 80,000 Certificate of Indebtedness 62,000 1977 Fire Bonds 60,000 $1,405,100 Funds have been provided for principle and interest payments on all bond issues except as shown above and no other levies are required. Provision has been made for payment of the City's retirement costs. :LL The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted this 4th day of October, 1977. 41 Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor SEAL ATTEST: John D. Frane, Clerk 54 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1978 IORESTRY BUDGET--Proposed Revision to Reflect $177,000 of Tax Support Sept. 27, 1977 Anticipiated City Tax Support State Subsidy GENI:RAI.OPERATIONS $16,928 (37%) $28,822 (63%) . 1. Personnel • Regular $26,900 .Temporary 12 700 • 39-600 2. Contractual Service Transportation $ 2,000 Printing • 1,020 Training 300 Meetings, Dues 6 300 Subscriptions 3,620 3. Supplies $ 2,530 $45,750 PICKUP AND DISPOSAL (MAULING) $69,486 (37%) $118,314 (63%) actual "out of pocket' 1. Personnel costs $63,314 Regular $94,200 Temporary 1,500 5 700 2. Contractua: Services Machinery Rentals $ 9,100 Removal Contracts 7,000 Rental charges for use 55,000 of City equipment as per Department of Agriculture schedule $71,100 3. Supplies $ 1,500 General Fuel C Equipment 8,500 Log Loader purchase 11,000$ $187,800 REFORESTATION $13,882.50 (50: $ 84,864 of public property 1. Personnel -0- materials 2. Contractual Services Equipment Rental $ SOO $ SOO 3. Supplies General $ I•C30 Plant Material 37.000 "Free Tree" Plant Material 32,482 - street tree planting program other SO: from ' property owner Plant Material 27,767 • public land qg 249 $ 98,749 , 13-32,2il9 $100,296.50 f177,000 '2-lnoG CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1978 FORESTRY BUDGET Sept. 21, 1977 THE PROGRAM . Identify diseased trees on all property in the City and require "sanitation" on that lying south of Hwy. 5, west of Co. Rd. 4, and south of Co. Rd. 1. Pickup and dispose of all trees taken down as ordered. Disposal at Hennepin County chipping site where dumping will be free of charge. Provide a free reforestation tree for each tree removed from occupied • residential property (single family and multiple) within 100' of the structure to a maximum of 5 per parcel. (Same policy as 1977). . Establish a program of street tree planting wherein the City will pay 50% of the cost of planting a tree on the edge of the street right- of-way. Trees to be spaced from 30-SO feet apart. The balance of the cost (SO%) to be billed to the property owner or assessed against the property. . Continue an aggressive program of public property reforestation in areas where diseased trees are removed and general tree planting on other public lands. . Encourage the "harvest" of elm trees and oak trees in advance of their becoming diseased so as to reduce the potential number of diseased trees in future years. . Require at the time of issuing building permits or approval of sub- divisions the clear cutting of elm in an attempt to reduce the hardship on new residents in the community. This debris to be disposed of by the developer. 1)'V t) Oct. 4, 1977' ' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 77-129 • RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF Crosstown ' Industrial Park BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Crosstown Industrial Park , dated 8/8/77 , a copy of which is attached hereto and amended as follows: is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor • ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk • • C/ 1 City of Eden Prairie Public Works Department • .Engineering Division • CHECKLIST FOR REVIEWING PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENTS Date .8/17/77 ; y.D. iE 77-P-24: Z-25 • 1. DEVELOPMENT NAME Crosstown Industrial Park I LOCATION NOrth of Flying Cloud Drive south and east of T.H. 169-212 in the north 1/2 of Section 1 • 2. DEVELOPER Mr. Frank Cardarelle 3. ENGINEER/ARChITECT/PLANNER Brauer & Associates, Inc. 4. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW Application . material dated 8/8/77 5. PROCESSING SCHEDULE: ' Application received 8/17/77 Watershed 8/22/77 Planning Commission Human Rights Park & Recreation 9/20/77 City Council 6. PROPOSAL • • 6.1 Q PUD Approval ® Rezoning 6.2 r f Preliminary Plat 6.3 Present Zoning Rural 6.4 Proposed Zoning 1-2 Park 6.5 Previous PUD 4 None 6.6 Previous Rezoning Agreement 4 None - 2 - 6.7 Single Family detached lots: less than 13,500 sq. ft. Density • 13,500 sq. ft. or more Density 22,000 sq. ft. or more Density Total SFD lots Multiple Dwelling Units: RM 6.5 Acres •Density RM 2.5 Acres Density Total Mult. Units 6.8 Owner occupied X Rentals 6.9 Homeowners Association proposed No 6.10 Other uses proposed The developer is proposing division of the property into 3 lots intended for office warehouse facilities 6.11 Requesting City to provide streets and utilities No 6.12 Consistent with City's Comprehensive Land Use map Consistent with proposed Guide Plan revision and Smetana Sector study ` 7. PROPOSED OPEN SPACE, TRAITS AND PARK DEDICATION 7.1 Parcels to be undeveloped as open space None 7.2 Trails (Location, surface type, ownership) No trails proposed • 56ia 1 1 - 3 - 1 7.3 School/Park sites None 7.4 Park dedication fee Must conform to the requirements of Ordinance #332 8. PROPOSED STREET SYSTEM • 8.1 . Check City's Comprehensive Street Plan O.K. . 8.2 Access to adjoining properties Outlot A will be used to provide access to and be incorporated with development to the north and east. 8.3 Street R/W and pavements widths 60' minimum R/W 38' wide, 9 ton design roadway, post no parking. • 8.4 Private streets Driveways and entrances must conform to City requirements and be designed to carry truck traffic. 8.5 Street grades, sight distances at vertical curves, concrete curb and gutter 5% maximum grade indicated on proposal. Concrete curb and gutter required. 8.6 Street names Review by Engineering Dept. upon submittal by developer. 8.7 Parking (Ord. #141) Must conform to requirements of Ordinance #141 1 8.8 Traffic volume impact on existing streets ))6f1 - 4 - 8.9 Frontages on collector streets None 8:10 Other comments 9. GRADING AND UTILITIES 9.1 Range of cut and fill Maximum-cut 12' to 14' maximum fill 12' 9.2 Significant land features to be preserved None 9.3 Drainage ponds Subject to recommendation from Watershed Dist. 9,4 Flood plain encroachment _ None 9.5 Development plan showing proposed grading, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain, minimum floor elevations, pond levels and Preliminary plans submitted representative soil borings. Must 9.6 Skimming and grit control for commercial parking lots conform to recommendation of Watershed Dist. - 5 • - 9.7 Sewer and water service to adjoining properties Utility service availability to be provided for property located north & east of site. Watermain loop should be completed through future addition north & east of site 9.8 ' Sewage lift stations required None required 9.9 Landscaping, buffering and lighting plans Conformance with requirements of planning and landscaping departments required. Underground 9.10 Natural gas, underground telephone & electric required 9.13 Other comments 10. VARIANCES REQUESTED None requested 11. OTHER AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL CITY APPROVAL X Watershed District DNR Minn. EQC X Minn. DOT Henn. Co. Metro Council Adjoining Community - 6 - 12. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED AND PENDING Levied: #4594. lateral sewer & water, $4,302.28; #5627, trunk sewer & water, $10,465.00; #6443, Lateral sewer'& water $4,711.28 13. OTHER REQUIREMENTS Environmental Worksheet X Rezoning Agreement X Developers Agreement (PUD only on Final Plat) • I/LI. • • • • Planning Commission Minutes approved A• '4- August 22, 1977 E. Crosstown Industrial Park, by Frank Cardarelle, request to rezone and plat 12 acres into 3 lots and rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park. Located east and north of the Prairie View Motel. A public hearing. Mr. Brauer, Brauer d Associates, stated Mr. Cardarelle and he concur with the staff report on the project. Mr. Brauej informed the commission that Brauer $ Associates have purchased one of the lots for their future office. Lynch inquired if the proposed plat leaves any land-locked parcels. Mr. Brauer responded negative. The planner asked if the Brauer Office would be an office/warehouse use or an office building. Mr. Brauer stated it would be an office / warehouse use. Sundstrom asked if anyone in the audience had questions or comments. None were raised. MotIOn 1: Sc.hee moved, Retterath seconded, to close the public hearing on the Crosstown Industrial Park. Motion carried unanimously. . • 14t ion 2: Schre moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the :1ning request from Rural to I-2 Park for the Crosstown Industrial Park. • Motion jet! unanimously. • ,r,n 3: • moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City .Council approval of the to'.n Industrial Park preliminary plat as follows: 1. that the cul-de-sac be extended to northeast corner of property to insure future development access off'of Flying Cloud Drive. Road should be extended as Shown in Figure 2. 7. outlot A not be zoned to I-2 Park, but should remain Rural until future platting of adjacent properties occur. 3. all industrial lots subject to cash park•fee. 1 carried unanimously. • • r.d0'J � n� • � • . .i; Nine Mile Creek Watershed District • 4344 IOS CENTER '1 .�.A ke ... '. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 35402 • 1,1 L.1 rrI • August 17, 1977 Mr. Richard Munde Brauer & Associates 6440 Flying Cloud Drive ,.f Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Re: Site Grading; Crosstown Industrial Park- Cardarelle Property Dear Mr. Munde: The Board of Managers of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans and grading and land alteration permit application dated August 17, 1977 as submitted to the District for the above referenced project. The Managers find that the proposed project is in general conformance with the policies that have been set forth by the District, and, therefore, approve of the grading and land alteration permit subject to the following conditions: 1. The District will require that the proposed hay bales at the inlet of the existing 24-inch culvert beneath Flying Cloud Drive be installed prior to the commencement of land alteration. These bales must remain in place and be properly maintained until all altered areas on the site have been restored. 2. The District will require that all altered areas be restored with topsoil and seed by October 15, 1977. 3. The District requests to be notified 48 hours prior to the commencement of land alteration. 4. The Watershed District approval is contingent upon full City approval. If you have any questions regarding the District's comments, please contact us at 920-0655. • ^Asti tlln 72truly, 6iJ�/. n D. DicksonR ENGINEERING CO. Engineer for the District A proved by the Board of Managers - NE MILE CREEK W SHED DISTRICT " e,President • Date /T .. JDD/dd • • // . - c: Mr. Raymond Naik 6-6/6 Mrs. rhyl I Is Larsen - ___.' • STAFF IUiPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant THROUGH: Rick Putnam, Planning Director •• DATE: • August 15, 1977 APPLICANT: Cardarelle PROJRCI: Crosstown Industrial Park LOCATION: The site is bordered by flying Cloud Drive on the south Highway 169/212 on the northwest, the Prairie Motel on the west, vacant land owned by Garrison Jones to the north and east and on the east by an office building owned by Mr. Cardarelle. REQUEST: Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 Park for 11.9 acres and preliminary plat approval for 3 lots and Outlot A REFER TO: Lake Smetana Sector Study, PUD 74-08 Rezoning information March 1975 Application material for 1977 request BACKGROUND: The project is within the Lake Smetana Sector Area, a public PUD approved in 1974. This study recommended that thisarea be commercial/industrial. This would include "office warehouse and expansion of existing office or limited coranorcial uses complementing this service to the industrial park". The 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan designates the area as Commercial Rctionat. Service. The preliminary drafts of the Guide flan Update indicate this area may be better utilized as industrial because of the lack of direct access from US 169/212. In 1975 the Cardarelle property was propos+'d for rezoning from Rural to 1-2 but no action was taken due to lack of information submitted by the proponent. A major concern of that time was accessibility to the properties lying to the north and cast. • 5619 S i _ 3 Staff Report-Cardarelle -2- Augu. 1S. 1977 • - SITE ANALYSIS Existing Land Use . Uses to either side of the proposed project arc Highway Commercial, I-2 and Office. North and east of the project is Rural vacant land, south is industrial land zoned I-5 Park. Shady Oak PUD, 71-02, for multi-family, office and commercial'is located directly west of the Cardarellc property across US 169/212. i �' r'' Mivni TDHKA Access, Circulation - Access to the site will be gained . ' rvw from a single cul-de-sac off of , 71-2 Flying Cloud Drive. Access to 1 Flying Cloud Drive from US169/212 ',; •.IL',lfi: -- ' is Shady Oak Road and from Co. • i1j_, ,,;i as pli! °"`eer ' Rd-. 18 a signalized intersection .. i(.0?;;.'. ,$• �Y "°c.bpwc,,1 with Valley View Road off of '' �`1' "r+y11 !I:70.- . Washington Avenue. ;'•,l.. ''', --- ... A major concern is not to land f / ''6PR'` t lock properties north of the pro- :-` t V �� rl posed industrial park, which , ;;; . It c., being surrounded on the north and ; - . 'I' r (' 4 east by US ie9/212 and Co. Rd. )R, .- -- ' c $7 would have no other access other �, i t than proposed by Mr. Cardarelle. I,-.,-, i 11 ./ r e- Figure 6, in the application material submitted by the proponent, indicates future possible platting and future extension of the roadway to serve the properties. The staff is concerned that the proposed cul-de-sac does not extend to the north east corner of the Cardarelle property as the future alignment clearly indicates. The staff recommends that this road be extended to the property line , with a temporary cul-de-sac installed. This will insure that the road may be extended when platting of the properties to the north and cast occur. Site Development The 11.9 acre site is platted into 3 lots and 1 outlot (A) with sizes as follows: Lot 1 2.0 acres Lot 2 2.0 acres Lot 3 5.0 acres Outlot A 2.1 acres roadway .8 acres 11.9 acres The staff feels that the zoning of Outlet A to 1-2 Park is not necessary at this time hut could be zoned when the future platting occurs (see figure 6,last page of application material). Staff Report-Cardarcllc -3- Aug. 15, 1977 • REC(NMENOATIONS • The planning staff recommends rezoning from Rural to 1-2 Park and preliminary plat approval for 3 lots as follows: Alternate A 1. approval as proposed. 2. subject to the cash park fee. Alternate B 1. cul-de-sac be extended to northeast corner of property to insure future development of access off of Flying Cloud Drive. Road should be extended as shown in Figure 2. 2. Out lot A not he zoned to 1-2 Park , but should remain Rural until future platting of adjacent properties occurs. (see Figure 6 of application material) 3. All industrial lots subject to cash park fee. The staff recommends approval of the requests subject to conditions of Alternate B. JEJ:jmj • • 6619 \ 11.44:4 •''e.47:. Gant-c5T ,, I .. A -:1\ i'.� ``. P \,,------7--N ,--- I /' - ) .. 7 (...y. \ . \\ \k : .„.....-__.,:,. ------------- \ , h-laFro g. \ ,..,1 ., \ . , . _________ ,.,- .. , \..,,,,,,,,,, . . s,„_0‹,-- .. ,,,,,„ , ic, . ... .‘,, ,,,..- ,,,,, . .., . . . . . .. . . .. 56,0 • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services1, SUBJECT: CASH PARK FEE/Parkland Dedication Policies DATE: September 30, 1977 At the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting of Monday, September 19 the Commission discussed further the matter of parkland ded- ication/CASH PARK FEE Policies. At that meeting they spoke to three points raised by the Council at their discussion of August 2 as indicated on the attached memo dated September 15th. Attached•is a copy of the minutes of Monday, September 19 indicating the result of the discussion as follows: 1. CASH PARK FEE revenue should not be used for the construction of trails along roadways within developments, but that construction of trails in neighborhoods should be the responsibility of the developer. 2. The City should not assess the CASH PARK FEE in the Preserve, Edenvale and Hidden Ponds, providing these developers live up fully to their open space commitments. 3. That the policies for the expenditure of the CASH PARK FEE be as stated on the memo of July 15, 1977. Attached is a copy of the July 15, 1977 memo with the policies suggested. • • • • FIRST DRAFT MEMORANDUM • TD: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services J. SUBJECT: ' CASH PARK FEE POLICIES: FEE APPLICATION, PRIORITIES FOR EXPENDITURES, ETC. DATE: July 15,1977 In.an attempt to resolve conflicts and misunderstanding concerning the CASH PARK FEE, the following policies are suggested: 1. The classification system for the City Parks identifies various levels • of park service (see exhibit A). The CASH PARK FEE revenues are intended to be used for those facilities at the NEIGHBORHDDD PLAYGROUND level. • 2. The Neighborhood Facilities Study of 1974 (see exhibit B) identifies park sites of neighborhood significance. These sites shall be the basis for identification of expenditure items from CASH PARK FEE revenues: 3. Ordinance #332 the "park dedication ordinance" gives the City the right to levy a requirement for parkland dedication or cash in lieu of land. The right to determine which shall be required - land or cash - rests with the City so as to insure the orderly completion of the City's Park System. 4. When reviewing development proposals the City shall insure that all neighborhood playground sites identified for inclusion in the Park System will be acquired utilizing Ord. 41 332. The City will credit the developer for land dedication only when the area to be dedicated is specifically identified as a neighborhood park site in the Park System Plan. In all other cases the City will require payment of the CASH PARK FEE. 5. The proceeds (revenues) from the CASH PARK FEE shall be expended based on the following priorities: a. ;Acquire neighborhood park sites in service area. b. Acquire neighborhood park sites in other service areas. c. Develop neighborhood park site in service area. d. Acquire and/or develop community park areas and facilities. • CASH PARK FEE POLICIES -2- 6. The City also requires the development of trails along collector roadways for safe biking and hiking. These will be put in by the developer at his sole expense - one side of the street only (to be selected by the City). 7. The City may also require the setting aside of open space for other than neighborhood playgrounds. This shall be done by: purchase (using other than CASH PARK FEE revenues) density trade-off, or based on regulatory authority granted under the Floodplain Ordinance (No.276 • or other appropriate ordinance and/or statute. 8. Mini-parkland and development should be required only in "multiple zoned" areas and then at sole expense of developer. • • • • ';G,23 MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Land Dedication Requirements/CASH PARK FEE Policies DATE: September 15, 1977 On July 18, 1977 the Commission adopted for recommendation to the Council policies for application and priorities for the CASH PARK FEE. On August 2nd Mr. Garens and I discussed these with the City Council. The attached minutes reflect this discussion. As you can see, major points raised were: . What about trails . Should the Preserve and Edenvale be required to pay the CASH PARK FEE? • . The priority for expenditures (Should the revenue be used only in the "service area" or be used first for acquisition regardless of area, etc.?) My comments are as follows: 1. Trails - are being installed by developers along other than residential streets (i.e. along collector or major routes). The City could use some of the revenue from the CASH PARK FEE for other trail construction.(along the creeks, .etc , 2. The Preserve and Edenvale - When the City was considering the establishment of the CASH PARK FEE we on staff suggested that the Preserve, Edenvale and Hidden Ponds be exempt from payment of the "Fee". The reason for our suggestion was that these 3 developments, while staged, had satified the City requirements for open space at the time at which they'd received concept approval. While a subsequent analysis (see attached) of their public open space dedication indicated that the CASH PARK FEE would have yielded greater value to the City than the dedication - we felt that a "deal" had been cut and thus the City should stand by it. 3. Priori - I've previously indicated my priorities as represented by the July 15th memo. S1n MRY It is imperative that the City reach a conclusion on these points soon. The development of the Edenvale Neighborhood Park may not be accomplished this fall 1 unless the question of applying the CASH PARK FEE is resolved soon. Attached . July 15th memo . August 2 Council Minutes . Neighborhood Facilities Map - 1974 . Analysis of Large Scale PUD Open Space Dedication I10rY Minutes - Parks, Rec. and Unapproved Natural Resources Commission - 7 - • Monday, Sept. 19, 1977 VI. OLD BBUSINESS A. Parkland Dedication/CASH PARK FEE Policies Jesson summarized the CASH PARK FEE policies as previously discussed and spoke to questions by the Council whether the Preserve, Edengate, Y and Hidden Ponds developments should be assessed. He offered three choices of action: 1. CASe PARE FED be applied to these developments; • 2. No CASH PARK FEE if the Preserve and Edenvale comply fully with PUD terms; 3. Assess a partial assessment. I Upton asked whether all service areas would generate enough funds for a park site. Jessen responded that some areas are partially developed, therefore they would not have enough fees to acquire a perk site, adding that the projected amount of fees collected throughout. Eden Prairie ' would buy all of the land identified for neighborhood playground pur- poses and have monies left over. Speaking to the memo of July 15, 1977 previously accepted by the Commission, he explained that the priorities were listdinit this iorder to achieve the accuisition of all neighborhood playground the Keighborbood Facilities Study. Garens felt that the CASH PARK FEE collected in ono area should be used for that area. • Jessen spoke to the value of the dedicated land by the Preserve and • Edenvale IUDs vs. what could have been generated through CASH PARK FEES indicating that the value of land dedication was less than the amount of cash which would be collected. MOTIONS Kingrey moved to recommend to the Council that CASH PARK FEES not be used for the construction of trails along road ways, but that construction of trails in neighborhoods be the responsibility of the developer; the City not assess the CASH PARK FEE in the Preserve, Edenvale, and Hidden Fonds, providing they live up fully to their open space committments as per the 1970 Edenvale IUD Plan, The 1970 Preserve PUD Plan as amended by the Blacklock Study for Anderson Lakes Park, and the 1974 Hidden Ponds PUD Plan-and failure to comply with these committ- ments by said 1978 would result in review of CASE PARK FEES and assessment of them. Policies stated on memo of July 15, 1977 are amended to show order of priority as 5.a, c, b, & d. Eotion died for lack of a second. MOTION: Garens moved to recommend to the Council the above position with the exception of reversing the priorities from the July 15, 1977 memo but instead retaining the order of priority as the Commission passed them on July 18, 1977. Kruell seconded, motion carried 5-1, with Kingrey casting the dissenting vote. i Kingrey commented that he disagreed reed with hetthe eeorder of we priority shouldno.5(a) through(d) because of many bydevelop what we acquire. • 1:inutcs - Parks, Rec. and Natural Resources Commission - 8 - lbnday, Sept. 19, 1977 MOTION: Garens moved to adjourn at 10:40 PM. Kingrey seconded. }Motion failed with a voto of 1-5, Garens voting "aye". Garens left at 10:40 PM. B. Commission Goa].@ Jossen spoke to the updating of Goal statements and to the time schedule for accomplishing them. MOTION: Kingrey moved to receive and file the report on Commission Goals. Kruell seconded, motion carried unanimously. Anderson requested a status report on Purgatory Creek. MOTION: Upton moved to adjourn at 10:50 PM.. Motion died for lack of a second. C. Liouor Store revenue - Kingrey Kingrey felt that with the liquor store opening it wps the appropriate time to request a position statement from the Council as to where the revenues would specifically go. Le said he would like to see then used for neighbor- hood playgrounds, adding that if people know what the revenues will be used for, they are more likely to patronize the store. IDTIOK: Kingrey moved, that because of the liquor store opening, we feel • this is the appropriate time to request a position statement from the Coun- cil on the use of the revenues generated. Kruell seconded, motion carried unanimously. • D. lame Leaf Acres Park - Kruell Ireviously discussed. S. Forestry - Pruell, no11O::: Kruell moved to table "Forestry", seconded by Kingrey. Motion carried uranin:ously. .. •sr.rss Construction street maintenance - Kruell truell requested that Jossen review the present controls on the cleaning up of gravel after work is completed. Jesson responded that there.are some regula- tions in effect now, and agreed to check further and bring it back for the next meeting. F1 i '.A'TICI:: Kruell moved to adjourn at 11:00 PM, seconded by Upton. Motion carried .,rv,n i r ou sly. Rce]cctfltlly submitted, Donn'l Stanley, Recording Secretary L J nn// =i MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council 711RU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager ' FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services/u � 1 , SUBJECT: Communication from John Markum concerning his land in the northwest part of Eden Prairie and the Edengate Development Proposal. DATE: September 30, 1977 On Monday, September 19, 1977 the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission considered both of these items. Mr. Markum contacted me a couple of months ago concerning his interest in doing something with his property, one option of which was have the City consider purchasing it because much of it is included in the conservancy zone of the Purgatory Creek Corridor. The Edengate Development Proposal was on the Commissions agenda for its 3. review concerning the park and open space aspects of the plan. After fairly lengthy discussion on the Markum Property the Commission took action recommending to the Council that the City attempt to proceed to acquire through dedication or purchase the Markum Property which is included in the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Zone (attached is a memo dated Augu.` 15, 1977 summarizing the tax status of the property and including the appropriate pages from the Purgatory Study together with a map showing roughly the boundaries of the Markum property and how it relates to the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Zone). In discussing the Edengate Development an opinion was expressed that the City should try an implement the Purgatory Creek Plan fully in this area and thus the Commission recommended that this proposal be integrated with the Purgatory Creek Study and the Markum Property so that the City could proceed with acquisition of the overall northwest Purgatory area. Pending could be available for the acquisition of these properties should the Council wish to proceed. I believe that a likihood of funding through govern- .nental sources (Federal, State, and Metropolitan) is good. Also because ±he Metropolitan Parks Foundation has indicated a willingness to become involved in the lower creek area, I believe that we could enter into a cooperative venture wherein they would finance the acquisition of parts of the Purgatory creole Corridor until the City could secure outside funding and then "buy back" uuui from the Foundation. As we discussed in the Bluffs Development Proposal the Foundation would acquire the property, hold title to it, and sell +t to the City at a cost agreed upon in a contract prior to their acquiring . ,, land. Generally this cost would include land, interest and taxes. Other I.,---,tt ion funding sources may he available under similar terms should the Council I Wish to proceed, A preliminary assessment could be available by the November 1st Public nearing set for Edengate. 56/21 MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services/i J, RE: Markum Land DATE: August 15, 1077 TAX INFORMATION The 5 parcels owned by Mr. Markham have the following "tax situation" today. PARCEL ACRES ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 1977 TAXES LEVIED 1973 1200 5.24 $ 7,900 $ 6,123 $ 363.66 3000' 18.95 $23,940 $ 7,865 $ 774.48 3600 10.0 $ 2,520 $11,700 $ 81.52 4600 19.8 $29,700 $ 8,866 $1,367.16 5812 3.04 $ 4,600 $ 3,549 $ 211.74 57.03 $68,660 $38,103 $2,798.56 All parcels are vacant land. I'm under the impression that no specials have been paid and that the amount due is the total plus 6.6% interest accruing since the date of levy. THE PURGATORY STUDY` The Duck Lake Trail Sector of the Study addresses this area and suggests "protection to the 910 contour". (See attached pages 19, 20, 21 from the study). THE GOLF STUDY Hopkins/Minnetona/Eden Prairie joint Golf Study addressed the potential use of this land for golf purposes. The Study recommended that the Purgatory Site should l;e acquired for golf development. It further called for the acquisition of portions 1 of these parcels. • sector analysis • ' • duck lake trail sector Environm.ntal Setting Natural Features: The area is generally characterized by low, rolling tope- ,i„ grapaiy and a poorly defined drainage system.• A major portion of this sector is marshland, which provides excellent habitat for a variety of wildlife species 9 including beaver, mink, muskrat, fox, racer„,, deer, duck, rabbit and pheasant. Vegetation is made up of dominant lovlanq-associated plants: dog w3, willow, basswood, ? '.basswood, aspen, and sane upland hardticxx s on the marsh edges. • / Hood plain— -•- - - single family lowland deciduous trees!shrubs\ residential development wetlands!grasses / '``,„•_,Z,,, . �� mac, ')` "/11 ,..,, aT _ ;t .y .s ,ate � � ,--,_: east • TYPICAL DUCK LAKE TRAIL SECTION Land Use: This area has historically been used for agricultural purposes, but the pattern today tends toward the single family residential unit. Open land exists beyond the marsh to the west-northwest and to the northeast, how- ever, proposals have been made on the development of portions of this open land. The area is in need of recreational acreage for neighborhood and ccm- sanity use. Constraints: Very little disruption of the natural environment has occurred in the immediate Creek Corridor to date. The concern will be in establishing a control for maintenance of the present condition. Soil conditions will `;?' affect use of land within the corridor (flood plain). Opportunities: Excellent opportunities for the development of neighborhood recreation site(s) and trails exist within the corridor. Unique vegetative areas exist within this sector—this includes tamarack and remnant prairie epicies. Da_1opinnt Proposals: A 120-acre P.U.P. proposal was made for land within the corridor by the Edina Builders group. Tne proposal has since been with- drawn. • 4 '. Roccnnr,xla ti ons Potential Use: The major element within this area is the "marsh". The area i* teeen Itighway 101 and the marsh should be protected for trail development. The marsh should be utilized for loth active and Lussive recreational purposes. 19 purgatory • creek 5( 0) • • • • lhis would include wildlife observation trails, and opportunities for inter- pretive developmnts. The developer nt of trails should initially include F ripheral marsh trails. Managenrnt: The marsh possesses the elements necessary for creating a wildlife Iioaage by increasing water levels. By establishing a program of water level stabilization and storage,- floras downstream can be maintained throughout the season. The structures installed for regulation can also serve to control the mcvalient of rough fish. Control: The area between Highway 101 and Duck Lake Trail can be maintained with the protective 60 acres/creek mile concept while the "marsh" requires broad-reaching controls to maintain the environment and unique habitat. This would require protection to the 910 feet above mean sea level contour (approximate). The marsh is one of the atypical areas within the system which requires regulation beyond that which is included in the 60-acre concept. • • • • • • • • purgatory 20 creek q..3 0 • 1',•` / i^�. cmrs_rvancy an I.^ • • f , IrAn!1nM tnnA 100.yoar flood contour , j ,r hip+ \,,,, l O r. , q fF_n r r ' G :/�l• ! r� • ;� 1; 9 , .. , . . . i \ .1.--N\ _ te _ u1`, )•. r _ ^ JJJ.�'. , , I . • I 1 r.',' ''' ..'.1 tS)\f i• :4. .., • duck lake trail sector 21 purgatory • • cree • • 56,3I MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council .wik THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services ..), SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission communication concerning expenditure of Liquor Store revenues r. DATE: September 30, 1977 At the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting Monday, September 19, 1977, Commissioner Kingrey asked that the matter of expenditure `a of Liquor Store revenues be added to the agenda for discussion before the Es; Commission. His intent was to express to the Council the Commission's desire for the earmarking of these funds for physical improvements in the park and recreation system. As you will recall, the Commission has from time to time communicated to the Council a desire to expend the profits from the Liquor Store and they are now reiterating this position. One of the Commissions goals for 1977 and early 1978 is to develop a priority expenditure list for the proceeds from the Municipal Liquor Store. They hope to have this completed and to you for your consideration in March. C` 0 A If MEMO . TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: September 30, 1977 SUBJECT: Road Location Iss.ie Lake Smetana Area Helle Property Since the September 6th Council meeting we have met on two occasions with several property owners in the Smetana lake area regarding the road location issue. The attachments hereto show the descriptive materials and road al- ternates given to the property owners at the first meeting on September 22. After lenghty discussions at the first meeting, we requested the owners to consider the matter and submit their proposals in writing to the City Staff. Another meeting was called for September 29th. At this second meeting we believe that there was a general concensus as follows: 1. There should be a "smooth" connection to the bridge approach at County Rd. 18. Such connection should favor the direct route for the 1roperties south of Valley View Rd. 2. A north/south collector street should be provided approximately 800' to 1000' west of Washington Ave. This would place a road- way along the westerly line of Mr. Belle's 16 acre proposal called Norseman Industrial Park 2nd. 3. The feasibility of a ramp connection from Washington Ave. to westbound I-494 should be pursued with the Department of Trans- portation. • 4, Hennepin County will not participate in right-of-way acquisition for either the Shady Oak Road extension or a relocated Valley View Road. 5. Some form of assessment district may be necessary to implement the acquisition of right-of-way and construction of needed road improve- • ments in the Lake Smetana Area. The written response received from Barret Transfer, G. T. Mork Co., Dominic Sciola, William Dearman, C. Binger, E. Peterson and P. Enblom are enclosed with this memo for the Council's reference. An additional meeting is scheduled for Monday, October 3rd between Harlan Perbix and the attorney for Mr. Bello. Perhaps by Tuesday evening we may have a recommendation for the Council in this matter that will be reasonably acceptable to all parties involved. t.. II -\ i Of:LOWiOE MOVING AND S1OIAGE i Member—tinned Vim Linea GOOD Wnyiaie Blvd./Mmneopolls,MN 55410 1612)545,8801 September 26, 1977 "e City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota Attention: R. Ullsted Dick Putman . Carl Jullic Gentlemen; This is in answer to your request for ideas on streets and rorle that would effect, our property on ',1ashin;t,on Avenue. Basically a's we see it at the present time, our property — and am sure others in our immediate area, has two problem. The first problem is the need for a street running north and reuth along the west line of our nronerty — from present Valley Vier! north to an intersection with a street running east—west bordlerin^ the north line of the !'`ilson Ler rninf nronerty. This rt.reet would take the traffic pressure off lleshinrton Avenue acid-7,ou rl Tv7•'�w access to the rear of our property and others to the north, south and west of our property. This street could also be reconnected with Valley View or Shady Oak should Valley View be re—routed at a later date. _ Our next concern would be the ' revision of the Valley View — ':lashi.n;ton Avenue intersection. For the present probably most of us could live with a thru—stop intersection to he later cham-e-i to a stop—go signal intersection. It would seem logical to believe however, that Vnl.lev View mould ultill^tely have to be hooked directly on to the west end of the Valley View bridge eliminating the 900 turns now in exist nce. At this point ingress and egress to and from Htghwny 18 would be— come very important to our operation enri pres;umrhly to others around u s. (continued) l' I ii I ,:ity of den rrnirie 9/26/77 At the present time, because of lack of knowledge on al.ternit•ivc;:, I would also like to be involved in cny future d1 cuosion on thin particular intersection. Attach-i is a men outlining my run,pestion for the street running nl.ong the west side of our property. It is indicated ao rollnyr. Sincerely yours, 11ADA REALTY COMPANY and,/or RARRETT,MOVTNG 3TORAr17 COMPANY • i/77 tohtrt P. Eidsvo..c RHE'/e.j cc: Mr. Gil flarkonwald • I !,tafa •i:t'pt.rt•.Zi'i:1Cr c Pod u. l:.pt . , P.Iit, i Hal f.ut:. - The property owner has not communicated any formal comments concerning the Ziegler plan. The Balfant property is being marketed for multiple family residential development at this time. fi Wilson Learning/other Developed Industrial Uses The adjacent industrial users have not communicated any comments to the city 'regarding the Ziegler plan. These property owners would he affected by the road access proposals at the time Shady Oak Road is constructed and Washington Avenue 's intersec- tion with Shady Oak is relocated. -- .7 tt ##L col t , (.,(2 2. r •) • • ; .1 ___P''_ 0 • _ .:e\s r `i /'�; _ . • cf'•—•:•'•.•.i•..-••? :,:,.,.r , (�A%, • \\ ,. 77773 - ►;. ..........--,, !. 0 ' - .• *k3 - -- Of .60 - 1‘., . ..f. , 7-1 v i. . '.. . I • ,c , . , i \ ' :• `✓� S� 1' YA r r "Si' f - = r • . i t,..ter ,� I 1 l: I " •. I . t 1 s �I�i . / • l J/ it w j' 'i t' fl .....1 ; G. T. MORK fd CO. INCORPORATED TELEPHONE THE MORE BUILDING AREA CODE 812 ede0 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH Ili EDEN PRAIRIE.MINNESOTA 85343 941-3040 September 27, 1977 (+gyp Q c ,977 Mr: Dick Putnman ��++ G Planning Director City of Cdcn Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55343 Re: Smetana Lake Area Road & Land Use planning Dear Dick: a C. T. Mork & Co. strongly supports the City of Eden Prairie in its efforts to assist property owners in resolving the long-standing issue of roads and land use in the area bounded by Washington Avenue. In our opinion, a strong demand for industrial facilities continues to exist in this area. We, therefore, look forward to the implementation of a plan which would allow us to proceed with development along Washington Avenue. Sincerely, C. T. t o r.r a co. C. K. Luxem, Jr. Vice-President CKL:baj cc: Rorer R. Ulstad, City Manager 1,/' - September 29, 1977 Mr. Roger Ulstad City Manager City Hall Eden Prairie, MN Dear Mr. Ulstad: We the undersigned, have thoroughly reviewed our plans with each other and find our proposed uses to be compatible with each other. Because we have found agreement, we also have developed common interest in resolving the status of Valley View Road. We feel this roadway with minor exceptions, should be completely preserved in its present state. The road has excellent potential to serve as a minor collector without any costs or conflict to all properties in its vicinity. The proposed uses along its corridor will not overly tax the roadway and can finalize this sector from reconsidering trans- portation alternatives. We feel that one of the most damaging aspects of these roadway alternatives is apparent lack of agreement on an ultimate roadway system. We, therefore, feel that Valley View can best serve us by remaining in its present state and we will plan our developments to complement the same._ >_ / : , , � o la /�.s1` �.2/ Wil B m Hil g ) er / C ((1/4( --...`(E. Peterson \-6,,(c,.11; ( c P. Enblom --..--` iv • MEMO • DATE: September 22, 1977 FROM: Dick Putnam, Planning Director SUBJECT: PLANNING/ROAD ISSUES , SMETANA LAKE AREA • Purpose • The City Council has asked the staff to meet with property owners in the Lake Smetana Area concerning land use and a transportation system plan. • Property Ownership Figure 1 ( attached ) is a half section map indicating property ownership in the areas affected by road improvements for the Lake Smetana Area. • Status of City/Landowner Plan Smetana Lake Plan The Smetana Lake Plan, adopted by the City Council in 1974, as an amendment to the Guide Plan, has been used as a guide for transportation and land use decisions. For the last year the City has been preparing an update of the total community comprehensive plan assisted by Brauer & Associates, Planning/ Engineering and Consultants. A draft form of the guide plan update will be discussed with community groups beginning this fall, and adoption of a revised guide plan is expected by late 1977. The Smetana Lake Plan attempted to balance the interests of various property owners with land use density/intensity and the provision for adequate trans- portation access to the Smetana Area. To accomplish these goals a compromise plan was adopted which addressed the conflicting interests for environmental sensitivity, residential development, gravel mining and industrial development. The plan provides a separate industrial street system which complements the County and State road system enabling high quality access while retaining the residential character along Valley View Road and Nine Mile Creek. Figure 2 (attached) represents the generalized Smetana Lake Plan as adopted by the City Council. Figure 3 (attached) depicts areas where projects are being considered within the Smetana Lake Area. • • Memo-Smetana Lake Area -2- Sept. 22, 1977 Transportation Many transportation improvements are proposed to serve the Smetana Lake Area. Some of those improvements have been accomplished while others are in various stages of planning or development. Figure 4 (attached) repre- sents the existing road system serving Smetana Lake Sector. The current road system relies upon existing Valley View Road and Washington Avenue/Flying Cloud Drive as the only access roads to industrial properties. ,Construction by the State and County along Co. Rd. 18 and US 169/212 has ;h improved the interchanges between the streets serving Lake Smetana and the freeways. Equally important to the development of the Lake Smetana Area is the status and feasibility of road improvements to serve the ultimate development envisioned by property owners and the City in the Area. Figure 5 (attached) ',1 represents those.proposed transportation improvements necessary to imple- jl ment the County, State and City plans. Those improvements include: I. construction of Shady Oak Road from 212/169 to Co. Rd. 18 as a minor arterial on the County road system 2. construction of a new Valley View Road north/south and east/west between Washington Avenue and the Major Center Area Ring Road. 3. improvement to the intersection between existing Washington . Avenue and Co. Rd. 18 by installation of signals, turning lanes, etc. 4. improvement to 494/Co. Rd. 18 interchange either with signalization, turning lanes, etc., or complete reconstruc- tion in cloverleaf configuration. S. development of industrial internal road patterns to serve expanded industrial areas as envisioned by the Lake Smetana Plan. Figure 6 (attached) illustrates the adopted Hennepin County Transportation System Plan. That plan proposes Shady Oak Road's extension through the +`t Smetana Lake Area to Co. Rd. 18 as a county road , and the continuation of Co. Rd. 39(Valley View) as a collector street for the area. Based upon that system plan county requirements for right-of-ways , street construction standards, etc., would be expected if the County were to retain jurisdiction of those streets Problem Some progress has been made in implementing the Smetana Lake Plan. However, much remains to be done before full development of the area is feasible. A key stumbling block is that successful implementation revolves around the completion of the major arterial road systems serving the planned industrial area. The City has encountered resistance to those needed road improvements from two levels: Hennepin County has expressed an unwillingness to partici- pate in any cost of road right-of-way or construction necessary for County road improvements in the Smetana Lake Area. They have indicated that after construction of said routes to County standards, they would consider taking those routes over for maintenance/jurisdictional purposes. Secondly, some property owners arc reluctant to provide right-of-way for those arterial street systems through their property without public purchase of that right- • of -way and any damages they may feel would be associated with said purchase. 11 Memo-Smetana Lake Area -3- Sept. 22, 1977 The dilemma that this places the City in is that if no cooperation between governmental agencies and affected property owners can be expected, then the cost of necessary road improvements will be excessively high and take a good deal longer than anticipated. This may deter development and may force re- consideration of the total plan based upon the cost vs . benefits. Alternatives to Smetana Plan A number of road system alternatives have been generated by property owners and City staff. These alternatives reflect utilizing existing road right-of- ;k ways and suggestions made by property owners. These alternatives produce different conditions for all property owners regarding land use and transpor- taion access to their parcels. Also, the total traffic which might be handled on these alternative road systems, particularly at the intersections with freeways, will have a significant impact on the desirability for industrial/ office development. ; • Summary • The City believes that the owners'and City's best interests may be served by discussing the transportation needs for the Lake Smetana Area with_the affected governmental agencies, property owners and businessmen of the area. The best solution would be for the property owners and governmental agencies charged with roadway improvements agree on a transportation plan that serves the property owners and is economically feasible. If agreement cannot be reached 3_ thenthe City through its Guide Plan process and road improvement responsibility must make the decision as to what best serves the public interest in the Lake Smetana Area. We hope that the alternatives outlined in this memo are helpful in clarifying the conflicts initially associated with transportation and land use plans and will further everyone's goal, which is to economically develop this important • section of the City of Eden Prairie. • • • DP:jj • • 14 1 I r 1 I. \�. I • C I_ A it C D 0 II 1 1 1l• \ 1 , 11.�',F A R It ,\ 1 1 .. - 1, i • :,.,:.,,.., ‘ ,, L� A Fiq. 1 I 1 1 : .... • I a 1 ,,, .1. \_.:' \ i I ... Ail i 1 i A;I ford,Cartrt,l'1'r I,:I4+.� IM 1 �\\I •?,' + 1110 4 Ion ' 1 Art li•for.l. lC, • .' 00. 0rcn l'artcr.II-l;cn, ti•.c.1,1•.ccn C. Suc°dsccn {Saco° .\ I i IA.00 800 400 ` 1. 1 1 \\\,11r 1 iI11/14• r ii. III I'r1.ly,I.C.i ntcnan;r 11llvllr .. f rau11n41°n •,• �� . >71/. Ini. _ i' -.�._ 1220 •I,,, i � flta ; 1 `. .arty .. . .. w.r.r - lillr•r .. I+ • • r l Condor ..'/I e.l•etrraun / 11.IM11. -sCulp0lat J..n 1 Y7.'.0 lx•t unf• 1120 i j // SJ?ew.Prrrrm. 7:w rvnrrOx tnl.ir • �� Mw.l'v. r ... I.,fc 1 .r.n .1111. / ,`N. I.l ax'1 I.S•vla 1•.1'4 Ccrtncv /,. , "I _ lullcrton 4210 iA.• w.. /' F 7 ,A i,M1 {Lill ` • \ k. 1 f ,n a /et 1 4 � '1/Q/R � ,�� t 1, LI. q ° 0 g ,,.,..,,,,_ �uo/R ' \\\. / >, -..,-,,-, ,.....,,,,, 1 isi.:::/./..\'0 i '1 . , ,, ,,,, .., 4 _ji . ii:,. i/Q 't '\ i td— ,i1/2.7— ,,,,J1..,i,s,) (-0\--- , A\ •I 1 i1/Qf\ \ ( l ) i i l"\:\ ,,5 I, `�..- '%' `))1 jt:( \\. 0 \ ,ii 11 R �� ;: .1•I _ l r ` � � .\ ,fit ...1 t.}. s� O V� R 4, * l' , 1 ,ll 'e - > // 1t1 Ili. 1 / 1. C...J d, ( ti 1/0 •,I, L c 8 i (**---.---. ifij 1 . 1 • -;..,. J i i w 4 i mb.0 �- !ill I, s 1.-3--::-:- .0in`) Cm. o/R l ;( . iL: - • ;` - .,) �. , . , • Q �� r .\ • • • �_ II 4/ k'://r / II'Ir ; I 11P i /� ; g ).. . 11;1,4 .,,,, 6, u.„.,,,.. ,__ ,,, p. I- - _......"/ 1 b.,-,1 ",-, ,,,,,76k, li I : ,. --......_-_. .,,,,,,-, ---4\' 6535) ‘ic . ...... rctict2v.t- L //,.,' 04 1' ir,'.,...P' dig ., *fr 1 \ fr,--ij k.=>72) _.2.1 _ :!, rtr—Lrgli • r, .... ' 12(),,z'• .,,,rl..;.-'1 t'''.'5, ',/i ) Q r , Vi, ,. ..„ .:;)-. •ii u —�1 . . ,;`� it.�,.` / Ct , , y r ��fitA;.iil �cr J,�% \ I 'L O f� G�G:Pg...'LLOLtilllN/,61 k.--2 LAKE SM ETAN A t! , 7 - , - ...-"..%•:Z\N ----.-.*V ..,.:' \ ..: ,..44.1.... ..'' XX /41-.....iti? 11 "A • P14)17 .-- + \t 1 , :4' :pT, A,,-,'.". '..'i r; fcv_A e,iii4Avi -- 14 / .-,-.6-., t..,., , , •., ..4, ,, i ' liIllriarii --. . , • is �nrro=� y ma ,,,,,L,..»).„, (, v, 1 LI t%) . VI ,;.;///-) \-.' '',,-\ • j 1-•,-- / f a•p L I 4 : • : *.- . , ::,..f CI . ' ''''-'r."-, ..!:,, IALTT7' (iy., (.(.c.2,7 ,, 1.--jc . ,1/..21,:_1.:__'• _, i(L.,..)1" , ___Ar--7'.,--L: — dr, � . it o .1,1•64:(- ,,,T ,,....,., -..,•-....,::„. t.,..,N ,fd,- . -- ..--•.:7 k- Akb, skri.f- p.......„ c-k‘\_\...,;„ (4,-,F,_,--k,r'A,__,I•'',, r,..:k-:-,-1 i,,in i;\ 3 • ....0 ' ...--k, c.., (2:____INt._ .. [iiirze- - --7 _-_: .„ _ \:. —____ ,,,c-, • §u ',llMr10 uu—,vV . LAKE SMETANA II i4fl ♦• ti \ a • ` / ) i I -/' ► "r`io 1 / 10: � I il I /I �7f.. 1 i .- nit, .1; . ' ' iii\k\ /,,,i/ , 0::)'.h.V.1,C ..---;\ i /I .r f itil Ilt IL. / 1, A r,'*. ‘,—.)\ . „ V Mwa - - Pr yr?7 (w , V1iiii1 U__\ // it ` •''' '% t(,) , cs... , ../..„.,--,,, p, ,,..: \ ',.. kiiiii ,.; ' ':•-• \ hilif . (e, ,_ r_ ,:,„, , ,..., _ _ .,,,„, .--,,,_._,,_,,.__,__, ,,,_", _ : _ ,, ..."... ..-"-.!-"7, ': gilt ` V•' ,),, r It/ 1 -� • ;. 'AF') %. j (fjl��,/,tom ---T . )� d iii,. 1 1 ---� ,` ) 0 t,. LAKE `,� ,, .✓// 1 l /.t 1 w-ir \� "Ai1-•--0:�.i .l "l•".i. •I.k:t1' a --- 'if a ---r" V., (e + '%tJ tf. zy,, .1 .. / C ,G . � •,a �r ,,, cm e,,II ' � 1. qr ,... \ 6 = . -Di>z o' o f )J� g • P iPtAi r _ \ z 0 e 1 *5 am** ? 71:rn: \otiiitg,-.., INN:, ,,,. \($ \!' Aid,�'4:5 -1.‘",,4 7—, <.:. — S vois / (J `,. _ _ li iim 1,1,1 P H H l MIL• 1�/ p ;W I .'.e' 4\; p I.f / .,is -4-7 . ^ L P� A It - C 67- ' i. -- " - .. 8 ti i -'V„. ..'"•44 . "�-) ' ‘a• f lip".e m'an Ili .`N ''* ail ' —, — 0 ' ,. A, \ F : i 10 ,,, ... , ••• I '`N4... \\ • L, ' "'. :I mill "' ' 1) ! ...t. • d> -<73rn -1 ro „... ..„.. \ 41), „Ili t mzz f l , # it Pill8 (nvv f w... f SgL:1� }` J c.,.,0 1 1'tfl , N. '-• ._,,b*4._. ' Y ''\'',.',\ 1.-,-'',N.--'t) (.ii6'.: _i'-'1'',.\.,,,,‘'-,\'-\:?... f\:,\V\ --1'[.__-1 . , I)1 -.1/4.---> , .-_,,, '."-.<-„„.,„, _ .,':,' �.:,. • ryJ . 1= VN.3WS � , ` ��3.1, ''1, 0 coy 1,, N-.. .. . ... .. ,„...„,, - . ..,:c.,, .. , ,,, ..,,,,,,.___,.. .„.„ ,,_ ,. ,,,, ..„. :),_.-., __(, , -- i .!-J ``I� l- 7'� J^\ //,- - lam `1i T • ��'- ! ; __ ,;;I -i„,,,r-\;/. i ( ' i e ....,,,, ..-_-:......J: ./..-- te..,.."....-... ... �. .,,, -- 1 (r..; g . ,�_.----,- r,y! : , , 6,I „it_ / Via:: "` cl/,:,,,.,,,, , , ,, // ,�iiifik,:! imr 41 ., ,/,),:, , ,,,„ „).,, ...,, ,/, .. N22-.,,,,... ,,,, ir • �, , , . eg / /� /"T�.�'� r rj �' � d .`j, ICI ;Ir t' ' !To" -y�it•. {,l� fn�� iII �/ (T .\/11 folic ---,-- - - - :,,,, i- ,—,p /ruasmier.ill - .. -'.----.:YX.' 1 )----- ' : " . A . '''C'k, ,.., GJ iNi 'i4 -*-.;--7.7 ----Ir V -.t.; 1;. `� t \Jd uti'a V ,�:Ji f :�" • 7: �� jam= 4, 11/----) .., — , ..',:::•.-.Z1-...tt-f,1„-, . .%\ . / ( --�-'"' i -� A b 3.>/V7 111 O 1 it f 0 --tl ''' ' ' /-^S‘4)) ' ( °": }, „..,1:1F-I:.• I 2/,'-'....,,,,z,.... . ...,,, ,) . .. , ,./..,,,,e , N;,..„.,. „ ..„ . .. T, („,., , ,::___,,,,,, , • , i .,_,.._ ..._.( .,... •,..., ,. ,, _,A, i n ' • "/(1( 7 li./I'" 'i 1 1 A .:(' // ic 1 / i '.i.; '1,)1 g I"-, 4, ....), „,,,1\.,\,./_,, ,,,,D � �. � +) VWMi \,\i', 1,-,:.—.,,\L d. 7 ' -.. • --g "b, '''....' I'i ��/n \iji i ,;) ,flu , ----i ,-)) . a illii 4 ' fill : , r-, ..:.:,. \\ i., A 1 .7!11/11 _ . , : v -e«J�� r1 // arc,/ ilt ). -L III= ' .,..v ••v.) ) ,/ itir y�: 11 _ , y %/�` III , .A',';----. ..—,___ , (1:::, ..., ,..6 , 1 -,-..-,_---7-,__-_______ ._____i!vo t littior .• (1, 'N,,,, v.. i .11.v ...,,,Nvi,.. ? _ .—..--„,..„,,,.;. .! --C , i ' L!g - �. 11 1 \ i in I \.,, i (I&Ki -;:i,„-_--=_J - k ,,, ,..) i J kV /7 ,1 1 r- ' -`-.-''pi, ' 1 j// .-?/ •.• i. o, ....„. _ 111, _41 \ 10 g( rA)1 : 1 ',', , ii!� I 10 ,-- , r: \i(((C1U-�t)h'i 3 . ,fir 1 gr. ir4./...,:7 !iii\` ' 1 1 n ,1/ Iji / e013 1.0A /7/j ' ''''T•K--4i/.7' 41' )1 1,:- .' ,-,11c-:,-,.9. 4f\J, i A '''', ;',./-)..3. Illi 'I' Ilti;40 ' .'1;;.f' \,_c—cs y 7-- ____„, 4.. 1V. --� RI yi - if I / 1 `--, L - 1 i :,, \� 'A/\ _ / . b Ihll — •"-__T,&,.., . 411411 ". — \\ t1 1-gA is Qr° 'N', '•; --: ITTEal I. l•-- , - IrC\ 1 7, -- \. , AI A. i 1 ... , , %.„)._,/, --,,,, _ , ,,,,,,,,,, .4 0, ,,,,,,k,,,, 1,_,/ ,,,,,,, ...__ / . . „, .,,4,,, '- :/ A . 111 . ,11. ,;, ,,,,,-, � y ' ` I ----- ._ _ ti't _ - ---1_- — ., i, if , it ::•,---:,-_)`• ]`,167/2H/„1\'''C.: tm --,_-___,A( t- - i ''''--- --) r „,.,__ 4---,,-p...,(!;;:/j. v _____f;,\\. :'.:.\c.,. )-- ).''''''' '''l• ':-;'' —'-. ' '''' '',,'^• - •% ,, X ' 1 \A - ' T q,-, •,..,. q,f-,--)f- ,,s ,'.'y-sz.,-rr"-....,... 1 -..— ,.,... -.\ '\, , .. ••• '",,k.,____ .2,-.4:,., s.____ ,•____ — 1.!„,. 11,..„---..,.., _ :-•..,„,,....„.;,..z...,..,,,,, my,3mvs r-.,,!...Z:20.-,,•.. , \'''\ --------: . ,. 7? .-----':"..7,.- .••• ,...4 .3,11, ) 0 r \\-_ . \ -..,..... .. ,---,_ _.,„,,,,,,, •. ) ..,.......\- //". ii.': ),-,,,_{\ ------)- 3 ,.:, 0-7 '''t,.,__-..,:.---•' ,r-2,-'' .,, , __ ,.;-,.. ,...„.,„--,, ,,. 7,,,,-„;:-...---,-,- .,..• „.. .,_,--,;. ,.1,,,,1 ------,,,, ..,),........ :„-- ....a 4 _--.. • ‘,. ii veT(.0Lti_47--,:11{-01.._.---,:ctjf ? ___. .i.1 .7. -1. . 1 '1 _..r., ,,,, •.-._ . ,, .,,,i-,7 --------, -xi, -.. ,, ,.,, ,---,,, ,, A . n, ..7_ 7 i, ,--, ....: 't,'(,.,.f, r,,),:,z,-..-------4; di - i r.i,, --- —, , . 7 , c_,,, -, ,/,,,,. ../., :,),1,\\...:_,i0\\...:„.,t,„:,,,,,,,::,/./....iiiii,..e, i , v Al ,(/) v.-' 7.—,_,,,,-,L,/..-- -,/ ii/ (t,'-' , .I.'/' ...,-- •:‘,„(C6f..- ip• i 41,---,.: i'„/ .. .----......--,-:,/ i, , .. : LI--' 2I41.7.tirS;7,- . ' "' 'ea. , ---- „,........,,., .1 ' A 00,71-6 I id (12-14' 1.:7;:).;4>"- -e..." ••• .ili,ell :Ili' iz ) I ; k, ..• ..„..., .,_,..,..... i_f____.7_77.„::,_ ,,,,‘___),_ 0,,,,,f __ 2 -- _,_.._ _, - , ,- ' i 4.••-,,,' ii.,,e. it __- ‘,.)''--- , .....„.fl 7 --\- ,---j. • --------,:.----: .,,.— , I , • ‘ i/' — 1 • ' ' _ e" . ii , • • 1:i.":)') ) --...„\ --_ _____. ............. ,.,.. ...• ,„ . ,—,___ , s .-----± --- --- . tt' -r-----1 \,,V,1::: ': ___1_ ' 173..—., ,,,.. . . -L-1. 1;••••.--L--,--------1-- - 1 - .7-. ,-..,\ -------i-ric,•,..-1/2 -.... iC ,.\,.., •••.---,-_-----,--S____--,---it Co" 0*. '---..- --....„_______ /.. "•"•-....;'..-.---- ---\\\\\\,- *''',-::'-"•-% / ) --' .}.)(11)1,f (._ Cr G '• ' ' ‘,,,-, \ "---, ...,......-.zq .^',' T,1 \ " -,-.- '- 1.•''' Y._',/, .....1,'c,-7-*\----' ••.:' '.' ----7.7. \ qo\y_ . ) / •--'. 1\ (---) ..'' ''\'''=`,,.>_. 1 \ , -.;_N-li•I' '.2'j. '`1).11, . .1:.N%'. }"1; : ....1.....- -, ''11- `•'' ..-` '\ -1r,-,-''' • ____•, :',\i„,-.,_: .• ,*- , ____ * .<, — \,, ....-------i,: •-c; ..\ - ' • •....a."------- V1,1015MS \ ''''Z' ...'' 17--:' "--;---t.•.:•-•:-.i("* ". ‘ .-\:,_•': .. . % 0 )( :..:•••:: \ —71\ •' .' • • • f I(.:'-' --'O-V '!;.? :\,.'• ) r---,.,,' , " . it; . k...,'',-,3„-..,„,„, ,f0,,,:•• • ,..)... \\-,‘,..- ,-_... kso T':,100__ ..,_ _...„, .,-;;-:••••g.r...-Y \\ b. 1''''::'•ks-- \''•-t-,-.-',;-," \. if'')/)'-'--)1,.././--\).\.?1,1 4.i':\'17.,,-----_--z•---,Aritik.- : --- --- f 1 t'll---''Vlie i I (IN S'ilt,/ Jr.----1:- .4:' or": %• : ''''':19 r ) ,,;...,(1,\ -,-.,>,-2(('''-:•-• "/tAK -:re°I v "'" -' 4'.. ,, , ,.. • > .)1 • '''' / -,-,------ /-•.•,/ ill ) i/1 k(, i I \ -, — _ 1.1' _:,__ / ./.',. _!---• _.,:/r„---..1 _______-- •.„ -,, ,;i1.\\ .8.:/, ,„) 1,,..,•,,,,--- /I - , ,,, ---„/.- -- — — •c/....7- •,,,,,- , r. )(41/(-4Viii -•,,-,---,:iir, Ili: If I) - ./ hi \,,, / , q)- ...., ,,_ ,/. .„,,, .:•,.,„ -p.,--- 0, ,,,, ,, • .....___. ,, , ! , •—t__ ..:,...___,4-_ - -- ---.41-1'•'lln‘tti‘;',,,J)7 c—r''` IL/,',,--) - _ ,_ : •,... - --..--- r,..;Fsr .. 1 - ' s A -.. .;,,.. ... I '' '''--, - • 7 , .. L. • 11 1,, ..... 2. \-,1,->,,,,,,: •'•;- • /7,,__1 ,,, \ ::. lk's- /' .•'-2::: . \\ \ -':' ) I (7/.''-' ‘A\ ‘-‘ • • I ' via• I I "4.11'III i 1 -- : _ ' , ,\‘;`,2,:._14)L\\•,,-.k. ,), IP...111/ r,)" , I ......•.... t ' bit 1 :Jc 1 , ......_ ( .. ....,..,,..,.._ .,,1 _ .1 \ 0 •-_., i__,,,, // t I q----- - I v, ,',•-,:: ,/--:\-.„ '}'-\ . • II` - ------. s, • • • .--- ----%, 7,.. ,,,- y., ' .1.....-- ,.,yi/ , \,,,,'..),;•911) .1 it \\\ ••. „-/.4',•'• / .. ., fl . \,,,„ ., , ./•-: .,..'.:::,;-,. . _ • ‘ ., )4.?• .,..;,/ v(..- A _,,, ,,,,....-___.=j-\ \ . • ,. .. ...---0.3 L i,.. ' ••\--- \, ,,. • /7•:..'4 I?to; ,6-,), ‘-i-------[_\,\ \ ; ,..•. ..,..,., ,, ...,,,,,„ ,,,---,-,..,1„..1-,2,7--- ,:.3 i . f,j )11 r p•\ iii Ili / ,,, •I • g : ,I j ,, 1,-„, ,,i.,•, _.?"- ,,,,,,.,,,,, / /p ,., %,..i._."---.---.\_ '14:46 : '-,.,4;1,.-- /, , , ..• /1. ,,,:_. •'''- - . .. ._-________ .•ct.4„: .• • -7.71,--ri, 1/,/, ,,' f.,""'""."77:a2"'• ' - ./'' 4)".'1'1/-:'/' /S.) -- /. r i , 0-- .. ' . , -----‘1..41- A 74y. co 1 1 trAke---AA: raV • '•-• 1 , r fi ,_____, ell-) .t_i 6 t _ __ _-4' I • ;`--. /,2' :7; .. tiOci.; <-•Z*:t ..-1-t:31111=3"ClICalitleiii0.413tt 1 il 1! ' • vovgcovv-ir ic" , . , „ ,.. 1 ,.. 1 1 • 4,„, ,,,, .„-_____,_(..45,7,•__ \ ,• 1 1 1 • (:„......„. ..4„.„,,,,:-....._ ,..._14./..,/ ...,_,... ..,._ ,,.,,,(• ,,,0 •,,•••,-,__,,-.:-,1;,. ! J, Ir.., 0-.:::::)• . A go ("'' f,', \__.-.)-:-.\ . , • ; . ' iyiii ) 1 / ) a ii mi,„.•:-.,,v,\, ,;.:1I : . - lei ., //, '/4' . ... - / cm-,ri i,. ,i , . .1 1 "n ...7.....-.., . \ i r : ' ' ...,.. ., - ..-.' ‘ \ '•, .'. ' ' 1-, 1 • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ' HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 77-133 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie be and they hereby are authorized and in- structed to execute on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie the Amendment of Lease and Guaranty Agreement by and among The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a New York corporation, the City of Eden Prairie, a political subdivision in the State of Minnesota, The Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis, Minnesota, a national banking association,.and Physical Electronics Industries, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, which agreement is entered into as of July 29, 1977: and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon execution of the above-mentioned Amendment of Lease and Guaranty Agreement, the fully executed documents are to be transmitted forthwith to appropriate rcprcaentntives for the signatories to Chat document. Adopted by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of October, 1977 Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, Clerk jtI :J4 POPHAM, HAIK,SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY,LTD. Ig , u wArtIr O POPHAM 4344 IDS CENTER RAYMOND A.HAIK ROOLP W.SCHNOBRICH MINNEAPOLIS, MN S5402 16121335-9331 tt DLNVLN K AN DAVID*,.DDT+M TELECOPIER 16121336-6630 ROIIE 1A MINISH RO WPC W rf I O. C WH1tr HEAD t1 4 B4COI D.K SL'; September 22, 1977 IHCDINIC. NOS p HONA1 U C.CLMO UII:At C. I,ODI PT JOHNSON , E.AHv H.14ACC1M6CH f OPENT S.DUHK f Pt DL PICK BROWN • BRL,L D.PALKENSON JAM( R.Si[REN .IAMCs B.LOCKHART JrN W HNDCIAKr.11 CLD f OHUM.GRrLNE D.WNLIAM KAur MAN Ms. Joyce Provo City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Re: City of Eden Prairie Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Physical Electronics Industries, Inc.) Our File Number 4097-011 Dear Ms. Provo: As I discussed with you over the telephone late last week, please find enclosed five copies of the Amendment of Lease and Guaranty Agreement pertaining to the above bond issue. This Amendment is requested by reason of the fact that Physical Electronics Industries, Inc. is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Perkin-Elmer Corporation (which the City of Eden Prairie was previously advised of) and that the only audited statements for these companies will be those of The Perkin-Elmer Corporation. • i understand that this matter will be placed on the agenda for the Council meeting of October 4, 1977. In that • regard, as requested, I have enclosed herewith a draft of a resolution which I would ask on behalf of my client to be adopted by the City Council. If adopted, I would request that the Mayor and City Manager execute all five copies, returning four fully • executed copies to me. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Also, if anyone from the City believes it necessary for me or someone from Physical Electronics Industries, Inc. to is.. • POPHAM,HAIK,SCHNOBRICH. KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTo. Ms. Joyce Provo Page 2 September 22, 1977 attend the Council meeting, please advise and we will make the necessary arrangements. Thank you. • Very truly yours, [mil -7' Frederick S. Richards FSR/nb Enclosures cc: Harlan Perbix, Esq. James Gregory, Esq. Dr. Roland E. Weber F636 AMENDMENT OF LEASE AND GUARANTY AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT OF LEASE AND GUARANTY AGREEMENT (the "Agree- ment") entered into as of July 29, 1977 by and among THE PERKIN- ELMER CORPORATION ("Perkin-Elmer"), a New York corporation, the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE (the "City") , a political subdivision in the State of Minnesota, the NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF MINNE- APOLIS, Minnesota (the "Trustee"), a national banking association, and PHYSICAL ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES, INC. ("Physical"), a Minne- sota corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Perkin-Elmer. WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, Perkin-Elmer, Physical and P.K.N. Corporation, a Minnesota corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of .Perkin- Elmer, entered into an Agreement of Merger and Supplemental Agreement, both dated as of June 16, 1977, pursuant to which, on July 29, 1977 Physical became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Perkin-Elmer; and • WHEREAS, Physical and the City entered into a Lease (the "Lease"), dated as of March 1, 1974 and as amended as of July 1, 1977, providing for the lease by the City to Physical of certain real estate and related improvements and equipment; and WHEREAS, the City and the Trustee entered into a Mortgage and Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture") dated as of March 1, 1974 pursuant to which the City issued a series of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of • $980,000; and r:o WHEREAS, Physical and the Trustee entered into a Guaranty Agreement (the "Physical Guaranty") dated as of March 1, 1974, pursuant to which Physical guaranteed to the Trustee the payment of said bonds and of the interest coupons appertaining thereto issued pursuant to the Indenture; and WHEREAS, Perkin-Elmer desires that Physical no longer be required to furnish to the Trustee and the City copies of Physical's annual financial statements; and WHEREAS, Perkin-Elmer is willing to furnish to the Trustee and the City copies of Perkin-Elmer's annual financial statements; and WHEREAS, Perkin-Elmer is willing to guarantee the obliga- tions of Physical pursuant to the Lease and the Indenture; and WHEREAS, the Trustee and the City are desirous of-having Perkin-Elmer guarantee the Lease and the Indenture and are willing '= to release Physical from its obligations to furnish its annual financial statements to the Trustee and the City; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. Amendment of Lease. Section 7.03 of the Lease is hereby deleted in its entirety and there is substituted a new Section 7.03 of the Lease, to read as follows: "Section 7.03. Annual Statement and Audit. The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a New York corpora- tion, will furnish to the Trustee and the City a copy of each of the annual financial statements and reports that it furnishes to its stockholders, at the same time as such statements and reports are transmitted to stockholders, and will have an annual audit of its books made by an Independent Certified Public Accountant." 2. Guarantee of Lease. Perkin-Elmer hereby uncondition- • ally guarantees the performance of all obligations of Physical under and pursuant to the Lease. 3. Guarantee of Physical Guaranty. Perkin-Elmer hereby unconditionally guarantees the performance of Physical under and pursuant to the Physical Guaranty. 4. No Set-Off. No set-off, counterclaim, reduction, or dimunition of any obligation, or any defense of any kind or nature which Perkin-Elmer has or may have against the City or the Trustee shall be available hereunder to Perkin-Elmer against the Trustee. 5. Default. In the event of a default by Physical under the Lease or the Physical Guaranty, the Trustee or the City, as ::_, the case may be, in its sole diccrction, shall have the right to proceed first and directly against Perkin-Elmer under this Agreement without proceeding against or exhausting any other remedies which 4 it may have and without resorting to any other security held by the Trustee or the City, as the case may be. 6. Costs and Expenses. Perkin-Elmer agrees to pay all the <J costs, expenses and fees, including all reasonable attorney's fees, r, which may be incurred by the Trustee or the City, as the case may be, in enforcing or attempting to enforce this Agreement following any default on the part of Perkin-Elmer hereunder, whether the same shall be enforced by suit or otherwise. 7. Additional Remedies and Non-Waiver. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the Trustee or the City, as the case may be, is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative 3 6-09 and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under y; this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruingF., upon any default, omission or failure of performance hereunder i�. shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. 8. Notices. In order to entitle the Trustee or the City, as the case may be, to exercise any remedy reserved to it in lfa. this Agreement, the Trustee or the City, as the case may be, shall first give five (5) days written notice to Perkin-Elmer at Perkin-Elmer's corporate offices, Main Avenue, Norwalk, Connecti- cut 06856, Attention: James P. Gregory, Esq. 9. Limited Waiver. In the event any provision contained in this Agreement should be breached by Perkin-Elmer and there- after duly waived by Trustee or the City, as the case may be, . such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other breach hereunder. _, 10. Amendment. No waiver, amendment, release or modifi- cation of this Agreement shall be established by conduct, custom "r or course of dealing, but solely by an instrument in writing duly 2 executed by the Trustee, the City, Physical and Perkin-Elmer. 11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the r" entire agreement, and supersedes all prior agreements and under- standings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and may be executed simultaneously in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 4 500 I .41 12. Invalidity. The invalidity or unenforceability of any one or more phrases, sentences, clauses or sections in this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of this Agreement, or any part thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and delivered on and as of the day and year first above written. THE PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION [Corporate Seal] By (/..,, /11;:/; ( Its Vice President and a Attest: Treasurer �) •; I Assistant Se eta ry PHYS1C:4L ELECTRONIC. INDUSTRIES, INC. w_.O2. //�� (Corporate Seal) By .�lA*Z lts President crl Attest: 71 I tacrear ? ';.1 `A CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE >4n [City Seal] By .4 Mayor By City Manager "i NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS, AS TRUSTEE [Corporate Seal] BY I Li t'iirr-L h • /�1n:�Q�--.� 'I':: Its Vice fresdent ntest: Y (., --c._____€:......, -4- 12-4;.-A-6—)‘.7 Its Assistant Secretary 5 6641 6a� 44. )i.C TO: Roger Ulstad ', FROM: John Frane DATE: 9/29/77 RE: City Hall Addition Our cost for the additions are as follows: " Bids Received $185,000 Fees 9,000 Equipment and Moving Costs 8,000 Chamber Improvements 8,000 , 5210,000 We could finance these improvements by appropriating $50,000 from the general fund balance and borrowing $160,000 from the utility operating fund for a period of 5 years at 6% interest. The 1979 through 1983 general fund budgets would repay the loan at a cost of $38,000 per year. I E DIRECTORS: Jowl AMAf S OLYMPIC HILLS GOLF CLUB . .. E f DORIS SR 9520 Franlo Road COS'Nf\Ftt.(AN 1nOMAS C ItOAA Eden Prairie,Minn.55343 nunY umn n 011ice:(512)941.6262 • cam• HAROLCA'AsAl D J AI,HLAO Go!!Shoe (612)941-52f5 HARDLD!PUHLAD e ,: J A f NIC! i ` W S WAIStl 4 If 9 DIRECTORS AND \ P. COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN: Ente�la 'tent 6 Houec Committee \.4j�-" -° ;, Cha,leu C.Acnwell Ha,old I'firaun Go!Commit,. Hifna,d J Rleoston Will,am M lionmer Uen,oe,sn.0 Committee • September 29, 1977 Join H Hanionson Legal Counsel Michael J Adams Mr. Roger Ulstad, City Manager City of Eden Prairie 7801 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Re: Public Hearing Olympic Hills 3rd and 4th Additions Dear Mr. Ulstad: Please accept this letter as a formal request for the City Council to schedule a Public Hearing on the rezoning of Olympic Hills 3rd and 4th Additions as soon as possible under the applicable ordinances. If you have any further questions, or if I can be of any assistance whatsoever, please do not hesitate to call upon me directly. Very truly yours, OLYMPIC HILLS GOLF CLUB 6, id,A...t,_.. , Michae� J. Adams President MJA:ba cc: Mr. Bruce Knutson Bruce Knutson Associates Butler Square Building 100 N. 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55403 N ,"R ;A :4 ^N 4,. } DATE: September 29, 1977 TO: Roger Ulstad FROM: Jack Hacking' SUBJECT: Preliminary drawings on two fire stations and addition to present station Our Architects Dickey and Kodet have requested to be placed on the October 4th agenda to present the preliminary drawings to the council and obtain approval to proceed with the working drawings. They would also like to obtain approval to advertise for bids when the working drawings are completed. They would like to return to the Council on December 6, 1977 to have the Council review and award the bids on that date. Architects Dickey and Kodet, Chief Ray Mitchell, Building Committee Chairman Bruce Bren and Jack Hacking, Public Safety Director will be at the meeting to answer any questions. i:f 1 a• • J-,(:,`I 11P 1, • EDENVALE,INC. 7766 Mitchell Road•Eden Prairie, Minn. 55343• 612/941-5300 September 13, 1977 .''.A Mr. Roger Ulstad City of Eden Prairie -;` 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Dear Mr. Ulstad; The Eden Prairie Planning Commission reviewed the revised site plan for the Edenvale Convenience Center at the meeting last night. The Planning Commission recommended unanimously to the City Council that this site plan revision located at Valley View Road and Mitchell Road be approved. Will you please place this matter on the Council agenda for the earliest opportunity. The site is presently zoned for this use and the approval consists only of site plan revision. Yours truly, Donald R. Peterson DRP/sr • • • approved Eden Prairie Planning Commission -4- Sept. 12, 1977 C. Edenvale Convenience Center, request for revised site plan approval. The site is located east of Shadow Green Apartments. The planner referred the commission to the revised site plan stating the staff is recommending approval based upon the staff report. r Mr. E8 Kodet, architect, stated they feel they can properly screen the project as was intended in the original approval. iie stated they are requesting a median cut on Mitchell Road. Mr. Lynch inquired who would 564 the service pumps. Mr. Kodet replied the attendants of the PDQ store. Don Peterson , Eden.Land Corporation, informed the commission only gasoline would be sold, not oil, antifreeze, etc. 5undstrom inquired where the underground tanks would be located and if there is sufficient room for fuel trucks to deliver. Kodet stated the tank locations are undecided and that they would investigate the room needed for delivery trucks. Peterson felt the 2 accesses provided would allow for flow of traffic if a truck temporarily had to obstruct an area. Fc fj ion_ hue moved, Lynch seconded, to recommend to the City-Council approval of the ';lcuvale Convenience Center at Valley View Road and Mitchell Road as per the report 8-11-77 with specific landscaping details to be worked-out with the city v:,ff and that the underground tank locations be consistent with the original • ; coval. Motion carried unanimously. • A/ I. • • • • approved elanning Commission Minutes -4- August 22, 1977 C. Edenvale Convenience Center, request for revised site plan approval. The site is located east of Shadow Green Apartments. ?, The planner informed the Commission the site is zoned C-Com and was previously ,` approved for a convenience center. } Mr. Peterson located the site at the Southwest corner of Mitchell Road and Valley View Road. He stated the convenience center will house a PDQ, offices, Eden Land Office and other retail/office uses . Ed l;odet, Dickey/kodet Arch.Inc., reviewed the building design, materials and parking plan. He stated a detailed landscaping plan had not yet been done. He felt a 30 foot setback from Mitchell would be adequate as they intend to 'g extensively berm and landscape the area in between the street and parking lot. HP stated a pylon sign and wall identification signs are.anticipated. `• tcrson said they asked,to be on the agenda to familarize the Commission with the , 1 :❑ and ask the commission to continue the item so they may complete their plans. , .un: ,n moved, Schee seconded, to continue consideration of the revised Edenvale nience Center until all .the material is completed and submitted. Motion !tl ,1 unanimously. • • 66/0 STAFF REPORT • TO: Planning Commission FROM: - Jim Jensen `''• THROUGH: Dick Putnam, Planning Director DATE: August 11, 1977 . :; SUBJECT: EVALUATION OF CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL CENTER, EDENVALE BACKGROUND Edenvale proposes a revision to the site plan for the convenience commercial center which was previously zoned to C-Con and approved with the Shadow Green Apartments in 1972. The plan at that time had two access points from Valley View Road with a cut in the median strip to allow for left hand turns into the northwesterly access drive. This location In Valley View , provides for five lanes of traffic , including right and left hand turn lanes and through lanes, and was endorsed by Suburban Engineering. The Mitchell Road access was to be a right hand turn only with no median cut. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Building Data Approved Plan: Proposed Plan: site 2.5 acres site 2.5 acres T retail center 4,000 sq.ft. retail center 5,950 sq.ft. ' parking 41 cars office 4,185 sq.ft. auto/center 1,750 sq.ft. total parking 78 cars • parking 10 cars gas area 3,300 sq.ft. The 1972 submission had a heavily landscaped berm off of Mitchell Road with a setback of at least SO ' and an elevation at the gas pumps consi • - derably lower than the road elevation. The gas pumps were also semi enclosed with a wall arrangement facing Mitchell Road and a port type • roof. This earth berming, heavy landscaped screening, elevation change• and screening wall all served to effectively screen the parking lots, gaslumps and associated uses. • i The proposed development plan has a setback of 30 feet from the street ROW with 18 parking spaces. Because Mitchell Road is a State Aid road a 50 foot setback is required with no parking in that setback. A screening • arrangement something like the original plan, using berms and heavy landscaping, would meet therequirement,;of Ordinances 135 and 178 and increase the overall desirability of the project. As mentioned before, the original plan did not propose to provide an access point for left hand turns off of Mitchell Road with a cut in the median strip. A protected left hand turn lane consistent with Department of Transportation standards will be required. The proposed cut in the median is approximately 220 feet from the Valley View Road/Mitchell Road intersection. Report-Edeitvale Con. Center -2- August 11, 1977 • From Valley View Road One access point off of Valley View Road is proposed with left hand turn lanes provided. This access is the same as was approved in the 1972 proposal. The other access off of Valley View has been eliminated on the proposed plan. The gas pump drive is setback 6 feet from the road ROW and is in full visibility from the road. The canopy over the gas lumps make the service island stand-out • with little or no screening amenities. Ordinance 135 requires 20 feet setback, as in the original plan. This would also provide enough space to do earth herming and/or landscaping between the site lines and the gas pumps. An elevation drop would also be appropriate to divert site lines and provide extra fill for • berming if necessary. Parking may be within 1/2 of the setback from this street. Circulation, Parkin$ The elimination of the additional access from Valley View Road is a plus, helping to define the circulation pattern and identify parking spaces for their uses. There are 78 parking spaces, 10 more than required for the amount of • square foot floor space. 22 of these spaces may be separated and defined as employer/employee parking with the remainder being open for the retail,office G public use. The parking areas are broken-up into small lots surrounding the building, the largest being 21 spaces directly in front of PDQ and the 2 retail stores. This separation of the parking lots is advantageous visually as well as functionally. Landscaping • The landscaping is more sparse. and less functional than the original approved plan. Berming and/or heavy landscape plantings should be incorporated into the plan, screening the parking and the gas pump uses as was the original intention. the additional setback requirements will give more room for these amenity treatments (refer to Landscaping Ordinance 178). Summary The proposed plan is different from the original approval with the use of more floor space, more parking and less landscaped area. The circulation flow is well defined and should work well. With a few site plan changes the neighborhood commercial center will be an asset to the community. RECOMMENDATIONS -Approval with the following revisions: 1. A 50' setback must be maintained from Mitchell Road. 2. A 20' setback for the gas service driveway pumps be met instead of the 6'proposed. X. Earth bcrming, landscaping, elevation changes be incorporated into an effective screening of parking and gas sales related functions. 4. Protected left hand turning lanes be installed at the two access points from Mitchell and Valley View Roads. The turning lane on Mitchell (toad must he according to Mn. D.O.T. standards. 5. Plan should meet standards of Ordinance 135, 178 and Sign Ordinance 261. JIJ:jmj V .. J }. I V. ., 4., ' , (- . . :`a r.. q w yot \ .. � NW t "1_7.Z.," . ,......>, , . ;:;!,,. 0 . 1 — 't '''47' °4\\\ r... . , ..•-•,-•,i,'„:.. , 'St. it,,,, 45 Iliff „I �ae�'r• . .. tip S< ,J CONVENIENCE CENTER PLA "'" a 1972 Plan • A,k rf. y ti 1.1 dE."e' .:,43.1wr.•-'a ,,,,,,l_.ri"�' rrr ' om SECTION • �Jl�) • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Marty Jensen, Director of Community Services..). SUBJECT: Notification of Tennis Court Funding DATE: September 30, 1977 We have been advised by the Office of Local and Urban Affairs Parks and Recreation Grants Section that Eden Prairie has received a grant from the fiscal year 1977 Outdoor Athletic Court Development Fund of $11,100 for construction of two tennis courts at the Forest Hills School Park. The City submitted a request for funding to include this project, Round Lake, Birch Island, Flying Cloud, and Prairie View. Only this project was funded after the review process used by the Parks and Recreation Grants Section and the Metropolitan Council. Initially the contract was for $5,500 based on a misunderstanding between us and the Parks and Recreation Grants Section. We have resolved this problem and the full funding for 50% of the total (100% of materials cost) is now available through the grant. The manpower is to be provided frcm the park crew and CETA work force. On Monday, September 19 this matter was discussed before the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and they recommend that the City proceed to construct the tennis courts at Forest Hills School Park as per our earlier application and the letter of notification from the Parks and Recreation Grants Section as modified to include the full funding of $11,000. 6651 - 7 4 e MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council a THRU; Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services FROM: Chris Enger, Park Planning/Development and Forestry SUBJECT: Analysis of Forestry Budget and Subsidy Program DATE: August 12, 1977 Included with this memo are comparison sheets of budgets, anticipated subsidies, actual costs, and actual subsidies for 1976 and 1977. In 1976, since the magnitude of Dutch Elm Disease was not fully realized at budget time, there was a cost over-run of $10,853.14 by year's end. This cost was offset by a General Fund transfer. Since sanitation subsidy was not anticipated, no money ' was budgeted. However, when the State decided to share in sanitation subsidy _ 50% for private residential properties, we applied for and received $53,100 to be used for 1976 subsidies and some indirect related costs. By the time staff weeded out ineligible property owners and applied the graduated value rates, actual costs to date for 1976 subsidy total S56,250. The State pays 50% of this, which means that we must return $16,175 of State Funds for 1976. r If we add money budgeted for 1976 to the General Fund transfer made in December 4, 1976, add the State Subsidy, plus the 1977 levy amount attributable to 1976, and compare this *o actual costs in 1976, it is possible to carry $15,675 into 1977. Now that we are better than half way through our 1977 program, and We have had some clarifications from the State, our costs and grants are clearer. At the beginning of July 1977, staff applied for $159,875 in grants, which would have been 45% of our anticipated costs at that time. We have received a conmrittment from 1'' the State of up to $134,236.59, which is 37% of subsidy and related costs and 48':; of public property reforestation costs. State Subsidizes only residential property of 5 acres or less. At this point, we estimate the actual subsidy to which we are entitled to be $98,715. You can see from the 1977 Forestry Program Sheet that by adding our State Grant, with - the 1976 carry over, with the levy applicable to 1977, against our actual costs, we have $19,940.80 that could be used towards subsidy of land owners of over 5 acres. As shown in the report of July 1, 1977, approximately 6,700 trees lie on these parcels. We estimate 1,000 of these occur in City Parks. This leaves 5,700 trees to be sub- sidized at some rate. Alternatives: 1. Subsidize them all based upon some number for trees over 6" in diameter. 2. Subsidize trees over 6" diameter with a limit of 100 trees per parcel. (We believe this would reduce the number of trees subsidized to 4, 700). If trees • were subsidized at $10/tree over 6" in diameter, this corresponds to roughly 20% of removal cost for large numbers of trees. This also corresponds with the small residential subsidy which is also about 20%, in most cases, of the removal cost. '3 2 -2- r If the decision to subsidize under alternative 2 at a $10/tree over 6" in diameter were made, the additional $27,059.20 would have to be levied in 1978 in addition to the 1978 levy. Based upon this years numbers and subsidizes, 1978 levy should be about $175,000 plus $27,059 or about $205,000. 'J';" • To • SUGGESTED COUNCIL ACTIONS 1. Approve subsidy for property owners for the following amounts: 1 acre or within 100 feet of residential homes 0-6" diameter tree no subsidy over 6"-18" diameter tree $25.00 over 18" diameter tree $50.00 yK: Residential property over 1 acre and up to 5 platted acres in size 0-6" diameter no subsidy k' k, over 6" diameter $25.00 ix All oLher property over 1 acre 0-6" diameter no subsidy over 6" diameter $10.00 One free tree for each 1 lost for residential property of 1 acre or less or within 100' of home, in excess of 6" in diameter, up to 5 total free trees. 2. Approve subsidy policies outlined by staff in July 1, 1977 report. Who does not receive subsidy? 1. Trees which are cut down which have not been tagged by our inspectors. 2. Trees which have died from causes other than oak wilt or i;, Dutch Elm Disease, i.e. construction damage, inflicted injury, horses eating bark off, etc. a. If elms have died from any of these causes and the bark is still tight, they are a Dutch Elm Disease beetle breeding habitat and will be ordered down by our inspectors. Owner hauls, no subsidy. 3. Trees not down by deadline (staff should be able to exercise some discretion based upon substantial extenuating circum- • stances). 3. Approve application for removal of lower Purgatory Creek from City Control Plan. 4. Approve revised tree disease ordinance. ‘)G`)� 1976 FORESTRY PROGRAM a � ITEM BUDGET ANTICIPATED ACTUAL COSTS ACTUAL STATE SUBSIDY STATE SUBSIDY Personnel $14,000 $14,182.40 $4,209 Equipment Contracts $ 7,036.96 $3,750 Plant Materials $.3,400 $ 9,377.50 'Free Tree' Public Prop. Reforestation Miscellaneous $ 4,300 $ 3,311.28 $ 845 Refunds - $ 855.00 Subsidy $56,250.00 $44,3001$28,125 eligibt $89,303.14 $53,100 - $56,250.00 not - $16,175 overpaid <` $22,200 TRT,T1W.14 pd.in T36,925 Y. 1976 Budgeted 1976 + $22,200.00 Actually Spent 1976 - $33,053.14 General Fund Transfer + $10,853.14 Private Property Sub.- $56,250.00 Dec. 1976 paid 1977 Retro 1976 - $89,303.14 1977 Levy Retro 1976 + $35,000.00 State Subsidy Received+ $36,925.00 1977, Retro 1976 + $104,978.14 Carry Over To 1977 + $15,675.00 • 6GSL/ 1 s 1 1977 FORESTRY PROGRAM ITEM BUDGET• ANTICIPATED PROPOSED ACTUAL STATE STATE SUBSIDY REVISION SUBSIDY Personnel $52,000 $50,440 $18,662 (37%) Equipment $28,685 (37") Contracts $ 7,000 $ 2,590 (37%) Plant Materials 'Free Tree' $20,000 $10,000 $37,000 Public Property $25,310 $12,148.80 (48%%) Reforestation Miscellaneous $ 9,000 $ 9,000 Refunds - $ 2,700 Subsidy • $120,800 $60,400 $99,000 $36,630 (371 $201.800 $70,400 $225,850 $98,715.80 j. 1977 Program Cost - $225,850.00 Actual State Subsidy + $ 98,715.80 Carry over from 1976 + $ 15,675.00 Levy applicable to 1977+ $131,400.00 :' + $ 19,940.00 z There are approximately 5700 large lot trees that the Council is considering subsidizing. If a maximum of 100 trees for property were eligible for City Subsidy, this number would be about $47,000. , 4.'! lj(P J October 4, 1977 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 77-131 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WOODLAND ADDITION • • • WHEREAS, the plat of Woodland Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the city plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minne- sota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED SY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat Approval Request for Woodland Addition is'approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated September 28, 1977. • B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified 'copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by • MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified • copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on • • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk JAA 66S 41 . r,k CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Engineering Report on Final Plat TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council ",a THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager , :d . FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer cC' DATE: September 28, 1977 i SUBJECT: Woodland Addition PROPOSAL: The developer, Edenvale Inc., is requesting City Council approval of the Final Plat of "woodland Addition." This is a replat of Outlots 0 and P, Edenvale 3rd Addition and consists of 57 single family resi- 4)' dential lots and 2 Outlots (R1-13.5). Outlot A contains approximately .R r 0.6 acres and OUtlot B contains approximately 2.0 acres. These out- - , �' lots will be used for open space purposes with ownership by the Eden- w_ vale Homeowners Association. HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved on April 4, 1977, per Council Resolution #77-42. Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the Council on .: 5/5/77 per Ordinance #77-42. di',r ' '^ The Final Plat now submitted for approval conforms with the approved 6" Preliminary Plat. Yv, VARIANCES: Variance for the sideyard setback requirement of Ordinance #135zr is requested as follows: g'; 5' on 1 story garages Y. 10' on 14 story houses `rr 15' on 2 story or greater houses 'l' 20' on houses built on corner lots but not conflicting with 30' setback on adjacent lots. A variance from the minimum lot size requirement of Ordinance #135 is => also required. These variance requests were documented in the 1/13/77 Engineering checklist report on the Preliminary Plat submission. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous roadways and bituminous path- `` ways will be installed throughout the development in accordance with City standards. `x 6;1 - 2 - Five foot drainage and utility easements are required on all rear lot air lines. ' -If • Additional width utility easements may be necessary to allow extension of utilities to adjacent areas and looping of the watermain system. The location will be determined upon the completion of utility plans. A 6' wide bituminous walkway will be installed in the locations indicated in the Planning Staff report dated February 25, 1977. The street name White Oak Court will be changed to Ironwood Court. "T" driveways shall be provided for all lots fronting on Woodland Drive. ` PARK DEDICATION: outlots A and B will be used as a walkway corridor and open space with ownership by the Edenvale Homeowners Association. Park dedication for this plat has been satisfied through approval of the Edenvale PUD. • BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit approved by the City attorney in an amount approved by the City Engineer shall be posted to cover the cost of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous roadways, bituminous pathways and street signs. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of "Woodland Addition" "} subject to the requirements of this report and the following: 1. Execution of the Developers Agreement." 2. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 3. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the amount of $1500. 4. Receipt of petition for street lighting. • CJJ:kh • 5,05? • October 4, 1977 ' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE xr HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • • RESOLUTION NO. 77-132 RESOLUTION FOR THE APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS TO T.H. 169 PROJECT, I.C. 51-266 • . WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City _; of Eden Prairie to participate in the cost of construction projects located ?" on T.H. 169 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction projects have been approved by the Department of Transportation and identified in its records as: S.P. 2744-25 and S.P. 2745-23, grading, • storm sewer, bituminous surfacing and channelization on T.H. 169 from .34 miles southwest of Schooner Blvd. to the south- end of Bridge No. 9738 (City share $56,481.00) S.P. 2744-26, traffic control signal on T.H. 169 at north entrance to Homart Shop- ping Center, 1000' south of W. 78th St. (City share (100%) - ,''.68,900.00) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that we do appropriate from our Municipal State-Aid street funds the sum C' of $125,381.00 to apply toward the construction of said projects and re- `s quest the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to approve this authorization. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • sy' John D. Frane, Clerk 765 • LLk}. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST October 4, 1977 . • CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) Clasen - Faucher PLUMBING • • Sunrise Plumbing, Inc. PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE • Richard Anonsen These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for the licensed activity. 4,L,Le_et4 me Rebecca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk SG10o . � �\ / � ? MEMO Date, September m, 1977 /\ ? To: Rog tam From: Walter Johnson \< \ Subject: Construction bids for addition to City Hall \ \ After opening and rev ns ct bids for the addition to City Hall; It is my recomme t as construction oontracts be awarded as follows: / § . . \ y General Construction Accept Accept • Contractor Base Bid Alt. #2 Alt. #3 G.G. Kranz Inc 135,340.00 +200.00 -250.00 For a total General Construction bid of: $135,290.00 Alternate #1, would provide for only a exterior building envelope, with walls around the toilet rooms and stairs only; if its at all possible, I would suggest that the installation of office partitions, with tile on floor, acoustical tile on the ceiling be installed at this time. I would think that installation at a later date would be more costly than in- stalled under the base bid. I suggest that alternate #1, not be accepted. Alternate #2, provides for the use of pitch rather than asphalt for the built up roof membrane. Due to the fact that the roof is flat with slow run off of water, pitch is a superior product and has self healing pro- perties. I would suggest that this alternate and alternate # 3 accepted, realizing a savings of $50.00. Mechanical Construction Contractor Base Bid :.9 Grendahl Mech Co. $32,625.00 For a LoLai of 632,625.00 Alternates #1,#3,#4, and #5 relate in the most part to alternate #1 of the General construction, so I suggest that we not accept those alternates. Alternate #2 is "frosting on the cake", that can be added later if there develops a noise problem between offices. Electrical Construction Contractor Base Bid Medina Electric Inc $15,970.00 For a total of $15,970.00 All the electrical alternates relate to omitting walls and ceilings in the lower and upper levels, if alternate #1 of the General Construction is not z' accepted then the electrical alternates should not be accepted. r`+ The grand total of General, Mechanical and Electrical construction is: $183,885.00 There is a total of 5920 square feet on both levels (2960 square feet per floor) of the addition. $183,885.00 s 5920 Sq. Ft. a $31.06 per square foot cost, this figure seems to be a good bid and in line with current construction cost. The construction times seem good. _t , Z 6 w�W aN nm I a bi> n A9 $ 2 ryryIOO O O7 Soo uGap 02 NgC, a^a nFN N N 4' h N to W N 1AW Y O . 8 O O O O ro o M a O' O p O O C W 1A6 hR N YC HyY$ n y p N'AF 4�k O o N I+G NG 0,-.• ON 88 ��yyyr l N 7 T11. W m V O 8 O 8 8 8 "o N C yP G �1yp)rypa .°. hy h h N h h� qy 0 '� OW�y p�yy yp L'� Z G O a 0 6 p µ oQO W pO a 1q{r®.� 8 8 O O O 8 t1 a MN H N n w r�o a tg nN/4 "/$ "t of A �QQro� 'w Ooa oa oaoa oa n O co' D b r, •p8O ON g,u OWto F a5 • 8 J 1 1 rti g 1 1 1 N N • 4 e g • o I g le • .Tx-ill a x Can C x n 1- 7 N tl O x M N� 8 M •Cq rrty1 N N r+J b/ ID R N 1 1 yJ :1 1" mrt6 W w. 1 F 7 ra."..a H r' -e; �wn n f] a a M ,aT m ii Z 2 x I 1 a L V C y' 3 � J. m 2 '8O A w N N W A b . 05 �O A A A 0' U N , J , N II S O N H WS O 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 ° 0 _ Vpy M am � gn �n (DNnor n S grt rt rt rt �on Q so g g o o o H nw M r 6 H M. O y a • N Y N g f r] , o O '1 yp {i yp yp {yL py, • yy G rj K m 6 ° 006 W S6 OSL ••D 0. �d N'J�GN o S S o S S S o F b A /90.[yyy� (@� ��pJ 1pp VN� N N g("• : P I 0 4 H F0•E 0 6 P. S W O W Y X w SA 84I Of Off O5 8 O5 8 rt Ort Ort O R O rt Ort Oft Ort W G -8 51 pMo b 9p p„y y QQ9[ . E Ns' (pmy. NN@ppp6 M1p@J (((0yyy (my ppp� O G O 9. O O. O e .p 2' O F `Y A Ort Ort Ort O() O() 8 O(� Ort MF• O O O O r� O t. O r� O ff O f� p b N8 S tl rt • 9 .4R OO Jrt4.JY tE Up Na 0. OC PNP O " C (0 OC OrtO Op l y 8 4 O" Ort O8 O Ort 8 8 84 O N 01 rt a 0 r 8" II II 8� MI 8" Ohy • • . N F K g N© 1 1 n I M , Q m 0 m m m m P . m a i m m m m .. a s o a a s a a a a a r a a q`� RE h n°i nn Iaj rai raj? nE mF ID A A 2 2 2 y' 'Aly • r+ F^ N F^ p. 775 "�ma �1° •°i�".1pi p� � 5 or ro y c S a i 3 p fw1 ": aw�re wM m« r 3 R. al ~: 8 A �� . m o p t"i Y N" O N I�4 7 Y A M 0 0 ~ m o ~ " v. O O O R m J i O w Do 0 O p p O p O o 74 . SFr oa a oa Oa NYd otcal 1 oa Imm Op.A O M 85 ER o f 8 E O 1� ER O rt '.,F` 6�+ ti p "1 A " n py % PE PE Pa11 ,' ua 1 a~ pi Of AG OG •G OG OG 1 . pa N N C OR •DR 8" OR oR DR o o y. H G 77, 0 o b tg gR R md 3E ed Na gg i oa Nd auo� ER � o � n� o e o o oo n R I 011 m m ppH tl N "a Pa PE Pa a Pa �a "aV ror4K ER Na c ER NC c 1 c as o n N 11 o n If ER on 1 an n"E Yo OA N If ER rt7 N!t ER O A OIv O 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 o O" O Y W eg s; Om s! SI a5 a Rnm g 9 ap« ill. 1°,n o pa n �55 w 1 apt n n m (HAS N N 7 N; M W M '1 y r�1 M . M N M M M 11 Fp• N N N O Y ,711 tl October 4, 1977 " STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE J. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 07-15-77 6346 VOID OUT CHECK (12.00) 09-16-77 6994 MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ;; ASSN. Seminar registration for M. Jessen 3.00 6995 MINNESOTA SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER Three P.S. officers for "Violence in the family training" 45.00 at 6996 DONNA STANLEY August services 158.38 6997 INSTY-PRINTS Services-Public Safety dept. 14.35 6998 VOID CHECK 6999 M. G. ASTLEFORD COMPANY Est. No. 4-Preserve Blvd. 14,502.21 , 7000 INVER HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE Seminar registration for Jim Zaic -Building dept. 34.50 D9-20-77 7001 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Federal alcohol tax stamp for _a' liquor store 45.00 •• 7002 HALLA NURSERY, INC. Trees-Fuller Rd. area 1,193.50 09-21-77 7003 TOWN'S EDGE FORD Trophy kit-Punt/Pass/Kick 83.00 t•+ 7004 GREGG NELSON TRAVEL, INC. Air travel to Louisville, Ky. for schooling for Joyce Holte 148.00 r';''r 7005 VOID CHECK i 09-23-77 7006 CASH Change fund for Liquor store 570.00 7007 ROBERT MARTZ Sept. expenses 103.75 7008 ICMA Conference registration for Roger a. Ulstad 131.25 ' 7D09 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSN. Employees withheld and employers contribution 9-16 payroll 5,657.30 7010 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK Bonds deducted 9-16 payroll 525.OD `4 7011 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 9-16 payroll 6,341.36 7012 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 9-16 payroll 22.01 ;, 7013 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERA- ATING ENGINEERS Union dues withheld for new union members 44.00 7014 STATE OF MINNESOTA Copy of Minnesota Session laws 1977 r for Public Safety dept. 35.00 r` 09-27-77 7015 POSTMASTER Postage for meter 1,000.00 'I 7016 MARTY JESSEN Sept. expenses 107.85 T.! 7017 STATE OF MINNESOTA August sales tax report 91.53 7018 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL SAC's collected for the month COMMISSION of August 24,131.25 7019 TARGET STORES, INC. Two cases clay targets for Public Safety dept. 8.30 09-30-77 7020 ACTION REDDY RENTS Rental of auger-Water Dept. 20.00 i . 7021 VOID CHECK 7022 ANCHOR POST PRODUCTS, INC. Pieces of top rail-Water dept. 46.56 7023 CLAUDIA BEARNAN Refund on gymnastics 13.50 7024 BESTOS PRODUCTS COMPANY Safe-way fuel transfer units 17.00 7025 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT COMPANY Equipment rental-Park Planning 100.00 7026 BROWN PHOTO STORES Camera repair-Public Safety dept. 51.65 7027 BUSINESS FURNITURE, INC. Filing cabinet- Two 270.35 October 4, 1977 09-30-77 7028 BROWN PHOTO Finishing service-Public Safety 12.45 `� 7029 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS, INC. Equipment parts 403.15 ''4 7030 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. Supplies-Cty 4 bikeway 8.62 7031 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO. Desk inserts for names-Public Safety dept. 11.67. 7032 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT Paint-Tree disease project 0.00 7033 CHARLES DERSCHEIK Tuition for Fire School 41.00 7034 DAY-TIMERS Supplies-Planning dept. 7035 DWYER SALES COMPANY Freon-Water dept. 64.20 7036 DALCO Cleaning supplies-Water dept. 41.85 7037 DORHOLT PRINTING Printing services 404.85 7038 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY NEWS August ads 242.01 7039 CHRIS ENGER Mileage-Park Planning 40.BO 7040 EDEN PRAIRIE GROCERY Supplies-Public Safety dept. 23.11 4. 7O41 ESS BROTHERS & SONS qu pm� t parts 44.00 +' 7042 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS `a-Werts-Drainage control 66.12 7043 JOHN FRANE Sept. expenses 109.60 7044 KAY FRICK Refund on gymnastics 35.00 7045 JOHN HENRY FOSTER COMPANY Service on compressors at Water Plant 659.55 7046 FRONTIER LUMBER & HARDWARE Materials 152.00 7047 SHARON GAGNON Reimbursement for school expenses 34.50 °w, 7048 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC. Employees insurance 763.10 7049 GLIDDEN PAINT Paint-Park Maint. 76.90 : _ 7050 GRANT BATTERY SALES Four batteries 116.20 7051 GUNNAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. Cover for light fixture-City Hall 15.59 7052 G.T.C. AUTO PARTS Lubricants for equipment 20.85 7053 JACK HACKING Mileage 60.60 s 7054 HANUS BUS COMPANY, INC. Bus service-Park & Rec. dept. 1,736.30 7055 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC. Radar repairs 85.00 7056 CARL JULLIE Sept. expenses 100.00 7057 JUSTUS LUMBER COMPANY Material-Water dept. 62.55 7058 JAMES JENSEN Mileage - Planning dept. 26.53 7059 KOKESH Trophies and football-Park & Rec. 270.63 ): ,, 7060 LOWELL LUND Mileage-Fire dept. IO.BO 7061 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR Equipment parts 43.75 ', 7D62 THE LETTER FACTORY Sign letters for Liquor store 76.39 .,,i.+ 7063 LANDCO EQUIPMENT, INC. Equipment parts 9.34 7064 MERIT PRINTING Envelopes 565.80 7065 RUTH MCCUBREY Refund on tennis lessons 3.20 7066 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY Test on well pumps-Water dept. 49.00 7067 METROPOLITAN CLINIC OF COUNSELING Services-Employee Assistance Plan 320.00 7068 MAYVIEW RADIO Radio repairs 39.00 7069 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC Service 3.75 7070 MID-CENTRAL FIRE & SAFETY CO. Hy-draulic expander-Fire dept. 759.20 7071 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. Blacktop-Drainage control and Street Maint. 11,139.64 .`_ . 7072 3M BUSINESS PRODUCTS Copy machine-Public Safety dept. 113.00 7073 METROPOLITAN FIRE EXTINGUISHER Recharge units-Fire dept. 24.00 7074 MEDICAL OXYGEN Oxygen-Fire dept. 14.30 7075 METRO PRINTING, INC. Envelopes for newsletter 148.00 7076 MCFARLANES, INC. Concrete-Bryant Lake beach 27.00 7077 MODERN TIRE COMPANY 2 tires 118.00 and tire repairs 43.60 161.60 .' 7078 NORTHWODD GAS COMPANY Equipment parts- one cylinder 32.91 of gas Service 64.94 `,` • 7079 MINNEGASCO 5G6.2 I October 4, 1977 .. 09-30-77 7080 NATIONAL POLICE CHIEFS & SHERIFFS INFORMATION BUREAU Book-Public Safety dept. 19.85 7081 NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSN. Dues for Sandy Werts 50.00 ,- I 7082 NORTHWESTERN BELL Services 2,077.79 `'`';'' 7083 NORTHERN STATES POWER Service 5,818.97 7084 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY Repair on seat of Public Safety vehicle 52.50 7085 PAKO FILMSHOPS Battery case and film processing for Public Safety 135.77 wf 7086 KELLEY PATRICK Refund on gymnastics 6.25 7087 PHOTO MILL Film-Assessing dept. 165.78 ,r 7088 PENNY'S SUPERMARKET Food for summer park programs and .,,= `:; for Teen Work project-Park & Rec. dept. 67.22 7089 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES Layton paver with all standard 1 ° and misc.optional equipment for Public Works dept. 8,850.00 7090 R. C. PRINTING COMPANY I.J. cards for liquor servers 1.00 7091 ROBERTS DRUG Supplies-Public Safety dept. 1.98 7092 STATE OF MINNESOTA Terminal for Public Safety dept. 238.33 7093 DON STREICHER GUNS, INC. Ammunition for Public Safety dept. 68.02 7094 STATE OF MINNESOTA Services-TH169-494 12,687.43 , 7095 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO. Single voltage power plant and airless spray `' • p y gun for Water dept. and saw guard for Park Maint. 592.82 7096 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES Portable restrooms-Park & P . 44.50 7097 STEPHEN B. TARGESON Surveying services for Community ` ` Oevelopment project 96.00 ' 7098 THOMPSON PROJECTOR REPAIR Repair projector-Public Safety 29.70 '7., ' 7099 ROGER ULSTAD October expenses 100.00 ': ' ; 7100 VAN WATERS & ROGERS Cholrine-Water dept. 1,008.50 7101 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY Water meter and repair parts for Water dept. 282.35 7102 MINNESOi4 CU MUNITY EDUCATION Conference registration and membership for Sandy Werts 35.00 7103 KRISTIN OPHEIM Refund on gymnastics 5.00 7104 SUSAN WILLIAMSON Refund on gymnastics 5.00 7105 LISA JENSEN Refund on gymnastics 5.00 '' ' 7106 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO. Employees insurance 430.94 7107 M. E. LANE, INC. Workmans comp., Auto liability ' insurance 3,977.00 7108 WM. A HOLMIN CORPORATION Portable sound system-Recreation 205.36 +` 7109 BEER WHOLESALERS, INC. Beer-Liquor store 527.70 7110 LAKE REGION BEVERAGE CO. Beer-Liquor store 468.73 'r` 7111 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Beer-Liquor store 518.70 7112 LEDING DISTRIBUTING CO., INC. Beer-Liquor store 811.25 7113 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer-Liquor store 314.35 1 7114 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS Cu. Liquor- 3,406.42 7115 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Liquor and wine 3,755.45 7116 QUALITY WINE CD. Wine- 546.94 I 7117 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Liquor- 1,182.87 711E JERVELL AND CAROLE HALMRAST Easement - Scenic Heights upgrading 1,145.71 7119 EDEN PRAIRIE UNITED METHODIST Easement-Scenic Heights CHURCH 5,458.57 upgrading • October 4, 1977 09-20-77 7120 LAURETTA PIDCOCK Easement-Scenic Heights upgrading 5,862.75 7121 DENNIS AND BARBARA WASYLYK Easement-Scenic Heights upgrading 122.12 7122 DUANE AND EILEEN PIDCOCK Easement-Scenic Heights upgrading 233.bt 7123 WALTER JOHNSON School and meeting expenses- Building dept. 47.3+' 7124 •W. R. MCNAUGHTAN Sept. services-Building dept. 448.0' ;' . 7125 SHARON GAGNON Reimbursement for book 12.9` 7126 JIM ZAIC Reimbursement for expenses- Building dept. 16.9 TOTAL 136,820.1r 3 607