HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 08/16/1977 EDEN PRAIRIE Cli? COUNCIL
TUFS::AY, AUGUST 16, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL
COhilCIL MEM3ERS: Mayor. Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers,
Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
SIAF : City Rauacer Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Harlan
Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Finance Director
John Franc; Director of Community Services Mart'
Jessen; Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo,
Recording Secretary
INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD TU SDAY, ,'ULY 19z_1977 Page 5246
III. PUBLIC I1EARINGS
A. Mani Leaf-Arres 3rd Addition br Jeri Corporation, request for PUD e
�L. F I __ _ Page 5088
CO ..i7t Appro aT rezoning from Rural P1-13 5 foi' aonroxia tely-$2
C and tree :cr1 to C Co.G.:cro:al _Coor aj oxmalF.iy 1..3 aces and
re iiaim.ry i Ir -tproval for 142 lots. The site is located East
of T.ri. 101, meat or' Hidden Ponds and North ar,d Fast of Hidden Ponds
11. (Xerolution No. ?7-96, approving tn, POD for I`iepie Leef
3rd Addition; 1st. Reading of Ordinance No. 77-Y8, approving rezoning
from Rural to Ri-i3.5 for approximately 52 acres and from Rural to
C-Cormm?rcial for approxiiuctely 1.3 acres for Maple Leaf Acres 3rd
Addition; and Resolution No. 77-97, approving praliminar' plat).
Con': rued Public. Hearing from August 2, 1977
B. Sanitary Sever and Watermain Improvemtints for Ederview I. Kutchsr's Pages 4980,
Addition and Kurtz Late,I.C. 51-30_6 Tkeso ut on il�. 77-903- 4998 & 5257
Continued Public Hearing from July 19, 1977
C. Vzln Woods by Dirlam PropertiesZ rent st to preliminary plat, _oppr-oximatelypage 5260
50 acres into sinrie family_ and double lots, rezoning from 11l-22 and
I-Gone al toill-13.5 and NM 675. and Civi ronmant a l Wo rkssheet. list'Readino
of Ordinarce No. 7/-30, approving rezoning firm Ri-22 and I-General to R1-13.5
and Ri+ 6.5; Resolution No. 77-108, approving the preliminary plat; and
Resolution Na. 77-111, adopting the Environmental Wor!,sheet) The site
is located south of Valley View Road and West of Chicago & northwestern
Railroad.
D. Aeasrlen. Hills 2nd by The Preserve, re nest to rezone from Rural to Page 5296
R1-13.5 andpreliminary _Oat_ulpsrwal_for 33 lots on approximate 15
acres. The :,ite is located rest of proposed farr�son Forest 2nd
and south of Amsderr Road. (Ordinance No. 77-Al and Resolution No. 77-109)
•
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,August 16, 1977
1V. REPORTS 0F_ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
V. 0RDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 2nd Reedim of Ordinance No. 351�Poolside_Apartments_,_The Preserve, Page 5319
rczoei ng hie 6.39acre site to RM 2.5 and approximately 1.6 acres_ to
Rio 6.5 for the construction of 84_apartment_units and the maximum
of 8 double bungalow units, and rezoning agreement
C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-19, Norseman industrial Park, rezoning Page 5347
16 acres from Rural to I-2 Park and Preliminary Platliprova1
C. 2nu^eading of_Ordinance No. 77-29, relaticp to the Industrial
Commission for the Cif of Eden Prairie and ai eniiin$ Ordinance No. 79 Page 5171
as amended--
D. Resolution No. 77-107, leasing equipment for Park Development Page 5367
E. Resolution N0.77-110, granting preliminary approval for MIDB Bonds for Page 5370 '
Covenant Living. Centers
VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Appointment of 1 mcgber to the Parks, Recreation E Natural Resoorces
• Commission fora term to expire February 28, 19601
B. Report of City Ati,orpey
C. Report of City Manager
1. Recommendation of architect for Fire Department Page 5380
2. Set Public Hearing for 9/20/77 on Budget, including use of Federal
Revenue Sharing Funds
3. Windslope Management Agreement Page 5182 &
5383
D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Tree Disease Control Program rage 5398
E. Report of City Engineer
1. Receive Feasibility Report for improvements on Homeward Hills Page 5231 &
Road-1.C. 51_309 (Resolution No. 71-1031 5402
2. Final Plat approval for High Point 3rd Addition (Poolside Apartments) Page 5403 •
Resolution No. 77-113)
3. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-32, renaming Garrison Way to Amsden Page 5406
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,August 16, 1977
`:i
E. Report of City Engineer (continued)
4. 1978 Federal Aid Urban project submittal Page 5411
5. Resolution No. 77-115, declaring costs to he assessed and ordering Page 5412
preparation of 1977 special assessment roll and setting hearing
date for September 20, 1977
6. Accept utilities in Lake Eden North II Page 5420
7. Final Plat approval for Hipps Mitchell Heights 3rd Addition Page 5423
Resolution No. 77-114)
8. Preliminary Plat approval for Round Lake Estates (Resolution No. Page 5426
77-112)
9. Final Plat approval for Walnut Addition - Dirlam Properties Page 5450
(Resolution No. 77-116)
F. Report of Finance Director
1. 1976 Audit Report Page 5452
2. Payment of Claims Nos. 6530 - 6638 Page 5455
3. Clerk's License List
VII. NEW BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT.
August 16, 1977
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENN]EPIN
The follo•,ain _accounts Were audited_and allowed as follows:
07.-'_3 77 6473 VOID 011T CHF.cv ( 343.15)
O -c11-77 6E,?a VOID OUT CHECK (36,767.44)
08•31--77 6529 VOID OUT CHECK
58--E1-77 6530 MINNESOTA TWINS Tickets for twins game-Paid by fees 186.00
00.13 777 6531 MY PIE Dinner for teen workers-Peck 8 Rec. 77.74
653? MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC Registration and title fee on
SAFETY trailer-Public Works dept. 3.00
6533 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage for utility bills 43.29
6534 HOWARO NEEDLES, TAi1MLN & �.,(y+ c�sd f
BERGEEDOFF 35.767.44
98•93-77 6535 IF:STY-PRINTS Services-Public Safety 14.70
36 3113-17 6536 PUIILIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employees withheld and employers
ASSN. contribution 8-5 payroll 5,249.73
6537 SANUI.A WERTS Cash change for playgrounds 30.00 •
65313 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 8--5 payroll 22.01
6539 FEDEPAL RESERVE DANK Taxes withheld 8-5 payroll 6,110.88
651C INTE2E'TIONAL UNION OF OPE^RTINC
3PCIN;LERS Dues withheld for August 121.00
6541 M13FA:SOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC Registration and title fee for
SAFETY new car 3.25
--- 6542 SOT. TESTING LABORATORY Soil test-Planning dept. 3.00
6543 PLTTY CASH Reimburse fund 33.26 I
08-12.77 6544 ACRO-ADROIT, INC. Office supplies 76.71 '
• 6545 AS1LEFORD EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment parts-Garage 38.44
6545 A&G DRAFTING SERVICE: -,b„,i -Liquor store 8.00 •
6547 EARL F. ANDERSEN Street signs 763.75
6548 AUSSSURG COLLEGE Guide Plan update S0ue'",01 3,000.00
6549 A:TEi:A, INC. Trees-Water Plant--bneor- 91.50
65E0 BRAUER F.. ASSOC. Services-Guide Plan and Scenic Heights
Upgrading 6,700.43
6551 CTS BUSINESS MACHINES Calculator-Water dept. 129.95
6552 CIHAUMASSEN AUTO FARTS Equipment parts 473.15
6553 COPY EQEIPt•1ENT Supplies-Planning dept. and ammonia
for blue-ray machine 21.62
6554 CHANHASSEN LAWN E SPORTS Supplies and repairs to chain sao-o
for Tree Disease program 168.56
6555 KENNFIH DRIVOANE Mileage-Tree Disease program 76.80
6556 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CO. July and August services 10.00
6657 STUART FOX Mileage-Tree Disease program 71.90
6558 FORES1RY SUPPLIERS, INC. Supplies-Tree Disease program 10.74
6559 FIRESTONE STORES Tir'•s c,.. SA✓.Kf ,,-, a.,... 368.26
65G0 FAIRFIFIU INTERNATIONAL CORP. Cleaner and degreaser-Water deGpt. 13r 20
6561 FRONTIER Lump Materials- .i t,-. f a-..1.6 .., / " 3.28
6652 GUY'S AUTO SUI'31.Y Repair-fie-auto u..G46.*---pi-^- J .
6563 G[NFRAI. COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Radio repairs-Fire dept. 134.90
6554 GRANT CATTERY SALES .44a4-tery- ;?.f-_-._-,-- 37.89
7r A7
IV August iG, 1977 1
i
r
08-12-77 6565 GLIDDEN PAINT C Paint for Park maintenance and
beach building repairs 134.26
6566 TAHIN HOLASEK Mileage-Tree Disease program 62.70
6567 HOWARD LAWRENCE A t. 125.00
6568 WILLIAM J. HANLEY 4' r - - ,v,� ''"'"1i 1,508.40
6569 MARK HURD AERIAL SURVEYS Topographic mapping 740.00
6570 HOPKINS DODGE SALES . Equipment parts 11.33
6571 HOPKINS PLRG. & TEM. Services-Water dept. 191.05
.6572 JOHNSON-BIGLER CO., INC. Blocks-Round Lake beach _ 10.00
6573 KLEVE HEATING tFE/RN^,r '''"' 5.00
6574 LAURENCE J. KEEFE Cla...-^,...A.",74r.r.,-. -/'^1a"4^'r 1,209.75
6575 KRAEMER'S HARDWARE Supplies vre,,.-,.c�"^ °^^"`, 'p`'' 216.90
6576 EARULF HARDWARE - : Supplies-Fire dept.-awrrwt 96.50
6577 KARLILF HARDWARE SWIM:0 J s -'""^ A.-•c_ T ••: A-11'"'"' 775.94
6578 LANDCO EQUIPMENT, INC. Truck with aerial basket-Park Maint. 19,119.00
6579 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR Parts for mower-Park Maint. 13.14
6580 MINNEAPOLIS STAR AND TRIBUNE House ads-Park dept. and liquor store
ads 77.10
6581 MUSGA LIGHTING CENTER Light bulbs-Water dept. 75.63
6582 N M INDUSTRIES, INC. Car wash powder 68.09
6583 H. R. MCNADCGTAN Services-Building dept. 128.00
6584 MEDCENTER HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance-August 757.98
6585 MiDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Asphalt-Street maint. and drainage
control 1,150.94
6586 3M PRODUCTS Supplies and repair service to
equipment 146.39
6587 MODERN TIRE COMPANY Equipment parts and repair service 24.56
6588 MEiRO PRINTING, INC. Newsletter printing 385.00
6589 MIDWEST RECREA1IOHAL Repair parts for foosball table 2.93
6590 NORTHERN CONTRACTING CO., INC. Repair watermain t L.+/.,4-,,..G..- 1,416.76
6591 NORTHWESTERN BELL Service 391.33
659? PETTY CASH Reimburse fund 39.89
6593 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance 3,219.02
6594 U. G. PEARSON Blacktop-Street maint. and drainage
control 861.23
6595 DICK PUTNAM July expenses 114.92
6596 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN Equipment parts and oil for lawnmower 6.70
6597 PLPSI-COLA BOTTLING CO. Pop machine 219.70
6598 BECK' QUERNEMOEN Mileage-Water dept. 6.00
6599 QUALITY REFRIGERATION, INC. Repair to a air
haia4444rm-arrtt-cu.,r,.,o...0 49.70
6600 NANCY RILEY Mileage-Tree Disease program 45.60
6601 ROGER RUTT Mileage-Tree Disease proyrom 75.90
6602 RIEKE-CARROLL-HULLER ASSOC. Services-Mitchell Lake-Pemtom, Homeward
Hills Rd. Improvements, Eden View I,
Heritage Rd., ST14 TH/5 Co. Rd. 4,
Forest Knolls 2nd and Stewart
Highlands 14,135.43
6603 DONNA STANLEY July services 112.00
6604 ROGER SMOKJI Mileage-Tree Disease program 30.90
6605 HOWARD E. SHENLIION ?.r,-,Lr.--"riL'" l!r---- - "'"o'``"'' 1,015.00
6606 5OUTNWi.STERN LEGAL FOUNDATION Dues 50.00
6607 SLP.RR OFFICE SERVICES, IUG. Typewriter ribbons & correct tape 93.00
6608 STATE OF MINNESOTA Services-Schooner Blvd.-494 3,272.91
6609 CORDON Slim COMPANY Equipment tires, parts and oil 178.09
6610 SIIAKOi'EC SPORTS CENTER Bart oars and locks-Bryant Lake beach 49.75
August 16, 1977
C3-12-77 6611 SUBURBAN AUTO ELECTRIC Repair alternator,
6612 TOWN'S EDGE FORD . 94.87
WY -+fete repairsC�.s °^s�eers $406, and auto
parts $15 421.94
6613 STEPHEN TARGESON "' . 1 Surveying services for Parks 88.50
6614 VAN WATERS & ROGERS Chlorine-Water dept. 514.50
6615 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER First aid kit for utility truck 122.77
6616 LORN L. WOLSKY Mileage-Teen activities program 9.60
6617 WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY Employees insurance 599.32
6618 WHOLESALE LIGHTING, INC. . Light bulbs for Water dept. 20.00 6619 WALDOR PUMP AND EQUIPMENT Repair to pump at lift station-Water
6620 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY rw 0:p°�pep meter and repair parts for 585 52
Water dept. 590.49
6621 CYNDI ANDERSON Refund on swimming lessons 14.00
6622 LORI ANONSEN Gymnastics instructions 30.00
6623 DALE REDPATH Art work for summer recreation program 49.00
6624 VOID CHECK
6625 SARA PALLMEYER Mileage-Teen work program 6.15
6626 BARD KNUDSON Stereo set-up for music at Teen center 10.00
6627 GRACE PEMbERTON Refund on tennis lessons 8.50
6628 CAROL SEVERSON Refund on tennis lessons 8.50
6629 DANIEL NORLING Refund on gymnastics 21.00
6630 COLLEEN RYAN Refund on gymnastics 4.50
6631 KENNETH JOHNSON Refund on gymnastics 10.50
6632 QRS CONSTRUCTION, INC. Est. No. 4-Stewart Highlands 42,143.49
6633 NORTHWEST BITUMINOUS, INC. Est. No. 5-Westgate E. addition 2,713.21 i
6634 G. L. CONTRACTING, INC. Est. No. 3-Heritage Rd. No of TH/5 13,082.87
6635 NORTHME CONSTRUCTION CO. E0t. No. 6-Mitchell Lake-PemLom 10,742.78
6636 P.C.I. Est. No. 2-Schooner Blvd.-494 114,419.38
6637 KOKESH Life guard suits and playground
equipment 348.15
6638 O'NEIL AMUSEMENTS Tickets for trip to Como Park-Park &
Rec. program 163.80
TOTAL 263,716.2C
J643t2.ls'
•
pf
•
•
MEMORANDUM
•--�-- ----- ---- JOHN FRANE
•
TO: Mayor and City Council
Fi:OM: Roger K. Ulsted, City Manager c v/ •
SUBJECT: Council Agenda for Tuesday, August 16, 197%
DAM August 12, 1977
•
II. Correct, approve and file minutes of Council Meeting held Tuesday, July 19,
19/7.
I11. A. At year last Council meeting it was moved to continue this item to August 10.
The Council requested additional information be presented and we do not have
Lon:pleted retorts at this time; however, the Perks, Recre tion Patural
Resource. Cni..eission is meeting Monday, August 15, and will have a reecoreJe!.ation
for ycr, consideration Tuesday evening. Mr. Jullie has finally ar•raaeed a meeting
h'ith the Watershed District for Tuesday morning to review and discuss druinaye
ponds and their location as it relates to this proposal. ito will be read„ to
outline his findings to you on Tuesday evening. Another area of conce+n that
the Council spoke to wcs the extension of Valley View Road east, ultimetcly
to ..eilety Road 1. Mr. Jul lie and I have discussed this and would rer;ucst that
the Council might consider requesting a feashility report on this extension and
should the Council give favorable approval to the proponent, we would have the
fc,..ibiiiie report completed for you to review prior to the final approve of
the ; -ojoct.
III. P. The Council will recall this is a continued Public Hearing from veer July 19th
Cou.c;l eevtiec, whereby the Council requested that responses be received from
the procerty ounces in the affected area. Mr. Jullie's memo attached outlines 1
the attitude and desires of the property owners in the area.
IIi. C. Proper notice:, have been published and notices have been sent to the adjacent
pro;'ori.y o,irers in this area. The Planning Comission recommends than: the. •
Council consider preliminary approval of the project. You will also note the
attached Levircnrrrntal tloeksheet that has been completed. If the Council chooses
to _jive approval, a 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-30 and adoption of
Resolution Teo. //-103 mere Id he in order. Also approval of Reesolution id. 77-111
would be in trrdee requiring the filing of the Environmental Werdsheet. with the
L,ivireemental Quality Council. Further direct the City Attorney to draft a 111
rLeening em'eenetnt.
III. D. Pecter notice,. have been published and notifications sent to all abutting property
owners in the arrected area. The Planning Commission recommends approval. The
proponents are appearine before the Parks, Recreation & (Natural Resources
Crdvsior Mondq evening and their reco;iauendation will be available for your
review luasda; evening. If the Council considers approval, I would recommend
the 1st leacher of Ordinr,nce No. 77-31, edoption of Resolution No. 77-1119,
and instruct i.rem City irltreney to draft a rezoning agreement.
V. A. All documents are in oedcrr. The proponent has presented their landscaping and
internal site plan to tire Planning Cormaisalon and the Commission has recommended
approval. I would recoreeind the Council consider giving a 2nd Reading to
Ordinance No. 351.
Mayor and City Council - 2 - August 12, 1977
V. B. I have not been successful in convincing Mr. Helle to sign the rezoning •
agreement relative to his property. As a result, through Mr. Helie's Attorney,
Mr. Groabeck, they have requested an audience before the Council relative to
their opposition to the dedication of 40 feet on the westerly line of their
propert , which is part of the rezoning agreement requirements providing for
a future road extension to the south as recommended in the Smetana Sector. •
I have arranged to meet with the proponents prior to Tuesday evening in an attempt
to make one wore effort to reach an understanding. 1 doubt if it will be
successful, (Letter attached irom-Mr. David Gronbeck dated August 10, 1977)
V. C. Reconuuend that the Council consider giving a 2nd Reading to Ordinance
No. 77-29.
V. D. Recomend that the Council consider adopting Resolution No. 77-107.
V. E. The attached memo oe lines the request of Covenant Living Centers. We have
included a preliminary resolution of intent for the Council to consider.
I would point out that even though the Council were to approve the •
preliminary resolution of intent, in the event as is outlined in Mr. Frane's
memo, the City would choose to back out at see future point in time, the City
can surely do so.
VI. C.I The attached memo outlines my recommendation for Council consideration of the
consulting firm of Dickey/Kodet/Architects, Inc.
VI. C.2 Recommend that the Council consider setting a Public Hearing for September 20,
1977 on the proposed 1978 Budget.
VI. C.3 As requested, the proponents have provided additional information relative
to their rental procedures. Also a letter of explanation is attached. A
representative of the National Corporation for Housing Partnerships will be present
Tuesday evening to answer any further questions you may have.
VI. D.1 A status report of our tree disease control program is attached. Mr. Enger
will review with the Council what in our opinion will be the total cost of
this operation for 1977. You will note in his report alternatives that should
be discussed Tuesday evening. We will review these in detail with you at that
time.
VI. E.1 Recommend the Council consider approval as per Mr. Jullie's memo.
•
VI. E.2 Recommend the Council consider approval as per Mr. Jullie's memo.
VI. E.3 The City has received a petition requesting the Council to consider renaming
"Garrison Way" to "Asisden Way". As per Mr. Jullie's memo, I would recommend
the Council approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-32.
VI. 1.4 Recommend that the Council consider approving our application for FAU funds for
1978-1080.
V1. L.5 Recommend that the Council consider approving Resolution No. 77-115, setting
September 20, 1977 as the Public Hearing date for approval of the Special
Assessment Roll.
• i
Mayor and City Council - 3 - August 12, 1977
VI. E.6 Recommend approval as per Mr. Jullie's memo.
VI. E.7 Recommend approval as per Mr. Jullie's memo. Also Mr. Perbix has reviewed the
Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions applicable to this plat and will
speak to these documents Tuesday evening.
VI. E.8 Mr. Eliason has presented his preliminary plat to the Planning Commission and
they have recommended the Council consider approval. You will note on the
Planning Commission recommendation-they are requesting the Council to consider
additional access to the proposed plat and are suggesting that the access
• route be provided to connect with Luther Way. The Council could consider
preliminary approval and instruct the staff to develop a report and recommendations
to acquire right-of-way east to Luther Way. We have not notified any of
the property owners in this area as to the proposed recommendations outlined
by the Planning Commission.
VI. E.9 Recommend the Council consider approval of Resolution No. 77-116 as per Mr.
Jullie's memo.
•
VI. F.1 A representative of the George M. Hansen firm will be present Tuesday evening
to answer any questions the Council may have relative to the 1976 Audit Report.
VI. F. Recommend approval of Payment of Claims Nos. 6530 - 6638, and the Clerk's
2 & 3 License List.
RKU:jp
Enc.
L..L-} BERG, HACKING & BERG
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
113 GRAIN EXCHANGE DUILDINO
WINNLAI-0L14 MINNESOTAt S S415
GORD,III J.OFR3 August 10, 191 7 AREA CODE 612
T[LEPII�NE
JOHN F. HACKING? . -. 336.0333
JUHN G.NERO
OF COUNCIL
NEIL B.GICTERICH
DAVID LiNONOECK
Mr. Roder Ullstad
City Manager
City of Eden Prairie
City Hall
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
Re: Heri.eiv Hello-horseman Industrial Park Second Addition
Dear Mr. Ullstad:
This letter will confirm our telephone conversation of Wed-
nesday, August 10, 1977. I requested and you agreed to place
the matter of the rezoning and preliminary plat approval for
Norseman Industrial Park Second Addition on the agenda for
the City Council meeting on August 16, 1977. At this time we
will request the council to reconsider its previous decision
conditioning approval of the plat for Norseman Industrial.
Park Second Addition upon the conditions contained in the
Rezoning Agreement drafted by City Attorney Harlan Perbix.
We anticipate making a presentation to the council which will
last approximately one hour. You have advised me that four
public hearings and other matters will precede us on the agenda
and that we should he prepared to make our presentation com-
mencing not earlier than 9:30. Therefore, we will arrive at
approximately this time and if the council should be ready to
hear us before then please advise them that we will be arriving
at that time. If for any reason we should be unable to attend
on this date, I will, of course, call you.
Yours very truly,
_.r- •tl��hl 'mil:
David Gronbeck
DG:as
cc: Herleiv Hello
W. Harlan Perhix
•
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 19, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers,
Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Harlan
Perbix; City Engineer Carl Jullie; Director
of Community Services Marty Jessen; City Planner
Dick Putnam; Chief Building Inspector Walter
Johnson, and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary
INVOCATION: Councilman Dave Osterholt
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Bye, Meyers, Osterholt & Penzel present; Pauly absent.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were requested to be added to the agenda under the
"New Business" category:
A. Dutch Elm Disease Policy
B. Resolution No. 77-93, requesting the State Tax Commissioner to correct
assessment inequities
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the agenda as amended
and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 1977
Pg. 2, 4th para., 4th line, strike "north" and insert in lieu thereof "south".
Pg. 5, 1st para., 3rd line, strike "private" and insert in lieu thereof "local";
and in the 4th para., 3rd line, after "complex" insert "of apartments
in Chanhassen".
Pg. 6, 3rd para., 2nd line, strike "1977" and insert in lieu thereof "1976";
and in the 8th para., 4th line, after "is" insert "a", and after "valid"
insert "question".
Pg. 7, 7th para., strike "3" and insert in lieu thereof "5".
Pg. 8, Ist para., strike "3" and insert in lieu thereof "5".
Pg. 9, 8th para., 2nd line, add the word "recommendations"at the end of the
sentence.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the minutes of the
Regular Council Meeting held Tuesday, June 21, 1977 as amended and published.
Motion carried unanimously.
Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,JuTy 19, 1977
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Sanitary Sewer and Watennain Improvements for Edenview I, Kutcher's
Addition and Kurtz Lane, C. 51-300 (Resolution No. 77-91)
City Manager Ulstad explained that an affidavit is on file calling for
this Public Hearing and that all benefitted property owners have been
notified.
City Engineer Jullie spoke to the Feasibility Report dated July, 1977,
• and outlined the project location map and various layouts pertaining to
the proposed project. Jullie further stated that all property owners
involved were notified and asked if a Public Hearing should be called.
The City received 76 responses - 55 thought it would be good to call
a Public Hearing,and 21 did not agree and suggested that the project be
dropped. On the basis of that return, the Public Hearing was called.
Jullie answered questions of Council members.
Philip Ween, 15908 South Eden Drive, James Cardinal, 15701 West 62nd Street,
Earl Drebenstedt, 15602 South Eden Drive, Mrs. Robert Jacobs, 6527 Kurtz Lane,
and Ron Pashina, 15600 Oak Ridge, spoke in opposition to this improvement
citing reasons, i.e., septic system has not given any problems, cannot see
additional cost, upset that cost does not include restoration, does not
like City water, and information received four years ago was that sewer
and water would not be in for a long time so one party installed a permanent
sewer system rather than a temporary one.
Gale Clark, 15901 Townline Road, and Clarence Guttromscn, 15004 Seath
Eden Drive, spoke in support of the project for following reasons: sewer
smells and is nothing but trouble, and also the system is getting old and
should be replaced before major problems start.
Tony Hirt, 6533 Kurtz Lane, stated if residents on Kurtz Lane want and
need this improvement, he would be in favor of it, and he along with
Mrs. Robert Jacobs, 6527 Kurtz Lane, and Mrs.Jan Sultzman, 15201 Kurtz Lane,
would like to see the two projects separated.
Francis Helmer, explained he was undecided as to if he was for or against
the project,but questioned why we are assessed for tying into Minnetonka.
Penzel explained the basic reason is the sewage flow would be using the
system being paid for by Minnetonka residents. The trunk and lateral base
is paid for by the local community.
Mayer Berg, 15619 South Eden Drive, asked if we would analyze how much of
a problem is in existence now and what the inevitability of the project is.
The following members of the audience participated in the discussion bot
did not state if they were for or against the project: non Rose, 15909 South
Eden Drive, Ralph Meyers, 15628 South Eden Drive, Ronald Hanson, 15807 South
Eden Drive, Mayer Berg, 15619 South Eden Drive, Mrs. Charles Carney, 15303
Kurtz Lane, Douglas Schmidt, 15209 Scenic Heights Road, Stan Rud, 15612 South
Eden Drive, Paul Rihwoldt, 15617 West 62nd Street, John Norum, 6309 Kutchers
Lane, Dorothy Bloomquist, 6441 Kurtz Lane, Don Lind, 15808 North Eden Drive,
Mrs. Westerman, 6409 Kurtz Lane, Mrs. Makousky, 6209 Eden Prairie Road,
Duane Pidcock, 8379 Red Rock Road, and Harry Bongard, 13600 James Place.
Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,July 19, 1977
A. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements for Edenview I, Kutcher's
Addition and Kurtz Lane, I.C. 51-3007Continuedi
Clyde Savage, 15924 North Eden Drive, explained that he has a big open
area right behind his property and he would like to see a fire hydrant
installed in close proximity to this area to alleviate the problem of
controlling fires.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to continue the Public
Hearing for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements for Edenview I,
• Kutcher's Addition and Kurtz Lane, I.C. 51-300 to the August 16, 1977
Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
Penzel asked that staff provide some alternate methods of assessing the
costs.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to instruct staff to poll
the residents by mail, making sure all residents on the assessment roll
are notified, as to their desires prior to closing the Public Hearing or
before taking any affirmative or negative action on this proposal.
Motion carried unanimously.
Bye stated he is not convinced the 8% reflects the same concern now as
it did the last year, and would like the rationale from the financial
consultants.
Council requested that a stamped self-addressed envelope be provided to
the residents asking them if they are for or against the project, along with
a letter giving both costs estimates as outlined at the Public Hearing.
IV. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
No Reports.
V. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from Tim Pierce for funds to help support "Project Charlie II"
•
Tim Pierce, Chairman of"Project Charlie II", spoke to his request for •
a contribution toward offsetting expenses which have incurred for
this particular project. When asked the amount, Mr. Pierce responded
$200.00.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to request the various Council
members to make a contribution to help defray the $200.00 which have
incurred for "Project Charlie II". Osterholt, Bye and Pauly voted "aye",
Meyers and Penzel "abstained". Motion carried.
B. Appeal of decision of Board of Apoeals & Adjustments from Dennis Peterson,
Attorney representing resident on Cedarcrest Drive
City Manager Ulstad referred to the memo from City Engineer Jullie dated
July 19, 1977, responding to the communication from Mr. & Mrs. Cable,
171B1 Cedarcrest Drive, Mr. & Mrs. Curt Oberlander, 17191 Cedarcrest Drive,
Mr. & Mrs.R. H. Cole, 17251 Cedarcrest Drive, and Mr. & Mrs. Whalen,
17190 Cedarcrest Drive.
Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,July 19, 1977
B. Appeal of decision of Board of Appeals & Adjustments from Dennis Peterson,
Attorney representing resident on Cedarcrest Drive
Mrs. Cable expressed her appreciation for the time and effort put forth
by staff and Council concerning this matter and feels all the requests
have been answered. However, she would still like to have the speed bumps
to slow down the traffic, but could see Mr. Jullie's recommendation against
the speed bumps for safety reasons.
Mr. Cable questioned City Attorney Perbix if the land hold agreement
had been signed and filed. Mr. Perbix replied that the agreement has
been signed and would be filed shortly.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to direct staff to record
and file letter dated July 15, 1977 from the aforementioned residents,
and the memo from City Engineer Jullie dated July 19, 1977, and that
steps referred to in Mr. Jullie's memo be carried out. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Request from Maw Beth Buckman and Diana J. Pauling for the Council
to closely consider expenditure for hockey in Edenvale and The Preserve
School Park
Mary Beth Buckman, 16990 Northmark Drive, and Diana Pauling,10805 North-
mark Drive, urged the Council to proceed with park development using the CE'IA
Grant and other park development funds, but asked that the City consider
carefully the amount of money being spent for hockey facilities as opposed to
other park facilities development.
D. Request from John Komula to build a two-story home in Edenvalc's Greens
Addition
City Manager Ulstad spoke to the request made by Mr. Komula for the Council
to waive item 3 of Resolution No. 526 as it applies to Lot 3, the Greens
Addition. Ulstad further noted that a two-story home has already been
built on Lot 6 of this same addition.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to continue this item to
August 2, 1977 and direct staff to review the proposed home with the affected
residents in the area. Motion carried unanimously.
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 77-89, _Approving the Preliminary Plat for Highpoint 4th
Addition, The Preserve
Don Hess, The Preserve, outlined the proposed changes in the Preliminary
Plat consisting of 34 lots.
Meyers felt the concerns of the residents that open space be provided
around the lakeshore has not been met with the proposed changes.
Bye explained that he thought it was the Council's request that the
developer come back with fewer lots, and this has been done.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 77-89,
approving the Preliminary Plat for Highpoint 4th Addition in The Preserve.
Bye, Osterholt, Tnd-Penzel voted "aye"; Meyers voted "nay". Motion carried.
•
Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,July 19, 1977
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-26, Highpoint 4th Addition, rezoning
from NM 2.5 to R1-13.5 and Rezoning Agreement
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 77-26, Highpoint 4th Addition, rezoning from RM 2.5
to R1-13.5. Motion carried unanimously.
Meyers explained that one of the conditions which should be included
in the rezoning agreement is a resolution as to ownership on Outlot B.
Jessen responded that he has reviewed the situation in the Trails where
the trail corridor and trail are privately owned and maintained, but
are available to the public under an easement and suggested that the
same apply for Highpoint 4th. Meyers requested that the rezoning agreement
be amended to include same.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the rezoning
agreement for Highpoint 4th as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
C. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-20, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for
the western approximately 200 acres of the Bluff's East/West PUD and
Rezoning Agreement
City Manager Ulstad explained that the Brown family has presented two
appraisal reports to the City.
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated July 18, 1977
regarding the two appraisal reports supplied by the Brown's, and further
commented that the approaches used to arrive at the appraisals were valid
in both cases and the two appraisers are well qualified.
William Hibbs, Attorney for Brown's, also answered questions of Council
members and stated that the Brown's would accept $10,000 as a reasonable
price per acre to sell their property.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt the 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 77-20, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for the western
approximately 200 acres of the Bluff's East/West PUD. Motion carried
unanimously.
Ulstad explained that Mr. & Mrs. Brekke are satisfied with the preliminary
plat design and they are in accord that sometime in the future they will
develop their property separate from this development.
Osterholt stated he would like to somehow adopt a policy that the flood
plain area and steep slopes not be included as he does not feel it is
wise for the City to buy unbuildable property for park purposes.
Penzel requested that the following amendments be made to the rezoning
agreement: Pg. 3, item 6, 2nd line, strike "Creekwood" and insert
"Creekeatch", and that a commitment be received from the developer that
the street names be worked out prior to approval of the final plat.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the rezoning agreement
as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
/�2cO
Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,July 19, 1977
D. Resolution No. 77-46, approving preliminary plat of 250 lots on
approximately 200 acres of the Bluffs East/West PUD, Hustad Development
Corporation
Osterhoit asked if this area had been surveyed for dutch elm disease.
Director of Community Services Jessen explained that the area was surveyed
for dutch elm disease last year and again this Spring. The University of
Minnesota and the Department of-Agriculture are advising us on a course
of action to take.
Meyers expressed her concern about the resolution of the northerly
lots on the east boundary of the Brekke property.
Osterholt requested staff to outline the preliminary development
proposals for the 5 acres owned by the Brekke's.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 77-46,
approving the preliminary plat of 250 lots on approximately 200 acres of the
Bluff's East/West POD. Bye, Osterholt and Penzel voted "aye"; Meyers
voted "nay". Motion carried.
E. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-22,prohibiting noisy parties and
unlawful trespasses uQonprivate lands of another without first securing_
written permission for such use from the owner of said property and
establishing a penalty for violation thereof
Osterhoit spoke to the report supplied by the Public Safety ui-!'uru cnt
at the last Council meeting which referred to the number of parties
the Department had reacted to in the last two years, and questioned if these
parties were satisfactorily concluded. If so, then he could see no reason
for the ordinance.
MOTION: Osterholt moved to continue the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-22
to the August 2, 1977 Council meeting. Motion died for lack of a second.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt the 2nd Reading of
Ordinance No. 77-22, prohibiting noisy parties and unlawful trespasses
upon private lands of another without first securing written permission
for such use from the owner of said property and establishing a penalty for
violation thereof. Bye, Meyers and Penzel voted "aye"; Osterholt voted
"nay". Motion carried.
Osterholt stated he believes this ordinance is an infringement upon rights
of assembly.
F. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-27, rezoning Eden Prairie Industrial
Park from I-2 to I-General for Champion Mill Property
Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance
No. 77-27, rezoning Eden Prairie Industrial Park from I-2 to I-General
for Champion Mill Property. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,July 19, 1977
G. Resolution No. 77-92, reg<aestin _and authorizing the Metropolitan
Council Housinc and Redevelopment Authority to ayply for Rehabilitation
Grant Funds for implementation of the Home Improvement Grant Program
within the Cit,_of Eden Prairie
Meyers questioned what happens if the funds aren't used. Planning
Director Putnam explained that not all of the communities are going to
participate and not all of the funds are going to be used. If we happen
to have more requests than $4,700, there is the ability to solicit funds
where needed if other communities do not use them.
•
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No.
77-92, requesting and authorizing the Metropolitan Council Housing
and Redevelopment Authority to apply for Rehabilitation Grant Funds
for implementation of the Home Improvement Grant Program within the
City of Eden Prairie. Motion carried unanimously.
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS •
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Appointment of two members to the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission for terms to commence August 1, 1977 and
expire February 28, 1980
Osterholt placed the name of Dr.George Tangen into nomination.
Penzel placed the names of Steve Fifield and Tom Jensen into
nomination.
MDTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to close the nominations.
Motion carried unanimously.
Upon tabulation of ballots, Steve Fifield was elected to be a
member of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
for a term to commence August 1, 1977 and expire February 28,
1980. There being a tie vote between Dr. George Tangen and
Tom Jensen, the Council requested that the second member be
appointed at the August 16, 1977 Council meeting.
2. Appointment of a U.N. Day Chairman
Penzel recommended the appointment of Doug Lind as the U.N. Day
Chairman.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to appoint Doug Lind
as the U. N. Day Chairman. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Report of City Attorney
1. Amendment to Physical Electronics Lease
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the amendment
to the Physical Electronics Lease. Motion carried unanimously.
•
r.2is
•
Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,July 19, 1977
2. Discussion on communication from Edenvale pertaining to Golf
Vista Addition - K. Schumacher
City Attorney Perbix spoke to the communication received from
K. E. Schumacher, Vice President and General Counsel for Edenvale,
Inc., dated July 1, 1977.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to direct the City
Attorney to provide an opinion relative to the communication
received from K. Schumacher dated July 1, 1977.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Discussion on intervening in MAC's lawsuit regarding jets
City Attorney Perbix spoke to request from iAC (Metropolitan
Airports Commission) for Eden Prairie to join in a lawsuit
prohibiting the establishment of a jet flight training school
at Flying Cloud Airport.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, that the City join
the Metropolitan Airports Commission in the injunction against
Flight Training Center, Inc., and also institute a lawsuit
against the Metropolitan Airports Commission to prohibit all
jet planes at Flying Cloud Airport. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Pepnrt of City Manager
1. Award bids for Civil Defense Sirens
City Manager Ulstad requested that this item be continued to
the August 2, 1977 Council meeting.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to continue awarding
bids for the Civil Defense Sirens to the August 2, 1977 Council
meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Discussion on Preliminary Plans and Layout for City Hall expansion
plans
City Manager Ulstad spoke to communication from Thomas L. Carmody,
Architect, dated July 14, 1977, and requested that the Council direct
the Staff and Architect to proceed with the final plans and specifications
and also prepare bid documents to be reviewed with the Council prior
to setting a date for bids.
Osterholt stated he would like a drawing submitted to the Council on
the land the City owns and how the addition will be situated on same.
Also that a sketch be drawn on how the present building will be utilized
and what work has to be done in renovation.
Meyers asked if a supplemental bid could be prepared for landscaping.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to authorize the City Manager
to proceed with securing final plans and specifications, bids documents,
and preparation of a preliminary landscaping plan. Motion carried
unanimously.
•
Council Minutes - 9 - Tues.,July 19, 1977
3. Fire Department Report on interviews with architectural firms
Fire Chief Ray Mitchell, Assistant Fire Chief Eugene Jacobson,
and Public Safety Director Hacking answered questions of
Council members.
City Manager Ulstad suggested before the Council proceeds in selecting
a firm or individual that not just the fees be looked at,but rather
let staff come back to the Council with a reconnendation outlining past 's
work performance and contracts with other metropolitan governmental agencies.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to refer this matter
to the City Manager for a recommendation at the next Council meeting.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. Request for authorization for Public Safety to advertise for bids
for two 1250 GPM pumper fire trucks and one 1500 GPM aerial ladder
truck
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to receive bids August 19,
1977 and award bids September 6, 1977,for two 1250 GPM pumper fire
trucks and one 1500 GPM aerial ladder truck. Motion carried
unanimously.
D. Report of Planning Director
1. Clarification of conditions for final platting of Red Rock Hills_
3rd Addition
City Manager Ulstad explained that back in 1974 and the early part
of 1975 the Council approved the PUD for Red Rock Hills. The proposal
included a 1st, 2nd and 3rd Addition. The direction given by the
Council at that time was that access to Red Rock Road be considered
before approval of the 3rd Addition. Mr. Ulstad further stated
that Mr. Houston is requesting a waiver of the condition regarding
the access.
John Houston, developer, appeared before the Council speaking to his metro dated
7/19/77. He explained that he is ready for his 3rd Addition and
has not met the staff recommendations of December 4, 1974.
Mr. Houston has brought letters to residents along Red Rock Road
and asked for their support. He explained the concerns of the people
were as follows: 1) Timing of additional access; 2) Assurances that
the City would initiate steps to provide additional access if developer
has not done anything in about a year; 3) Posting of speed limit on
Red Rock Road; and 4) Dirt on the road by developer.
Mr. Martinson, 8317 Red Rock Road, expressed concern about the vehicular
traffic and construction traffic. He reinforced need for the road.
Penzel asked Mr. Houston if he considered a northwesterly connection.
Mr. Houston stated he had and there is about a 45 acre parcel involved.
He further noted that people are cooperative but are concerned about
putting a road in ahead of time. Houston further responded if the City
were willing to obtain an easement, he would be willing to grade the
road.
Council Minutes - 10 - Tues.,July 19, 1977
1. Clarification of conditions for final_platting of Red Rock Hills
3rd Addition (continuedj
Duane Pidcock, 8379 Red Rock Road, would prefer to see the access
on another road other than Red Rock Road. Did not want to go on record
in opposition to the Council's waiving the restriction for Mr. Houston,
but would prefer a construction road.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to refer this matter to
Staff to report on the alternatives as to a resolution of the
matter, and also to the City Attorney for a report on condemnation
proceedings. Further that residents be advised that this item will
be on the August 2, 1977 Council Agenda.
MOTION TO AMEND: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to amend the previous
motion to have the Staff provide road extension information, hut to allow
the final platting and installation of utilities and streets to occur
on the 3rd Phase of the Red Rock Hills Subdivision while the Council
is making its determination on the road extension, with the maximum
of 15 building permits to be issued for 1977. Meyers, Bye and Penzel
voted "aye", Osterholt voted "nay". Motion carried.
VOTE DN MOTION AS AMENDED: Meyers and Bye voted "aye", Osterholt and
Penzel voted "nay". Motion as amended failed.
Meyer; stated that the motion as amended included all concerns.
MOTION TO RECONSIDER: Osterholt moved. seconded by Penzel, to
reconsider the previous motion as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
VDTE ON PREVIOUS MOTION AS AMENDED: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye,
to approve the previous motion as amended. Meyers, Bye and Penzel
voted "aye", Osterholt voted "nay". Motion carried.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to continue the Council meeting until 12:20 AM.
Motion carried unanimously.
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Cooler for Liquor Store
Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to publish notice for bids for a
walk-in Cooler to be received August 1, 2:00 PM, and considered by
the Council August 2, 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Park Development Projects and Financing Sources for 1977
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated July 15,
1977)and answered questions of Council members.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Rye, to approve the Parks, Recreation
& Natural Resources Commission recommendation for Park development, directing
the Staff to apply for funding as necessary, and authorizing the Staff
to publish notice for Bids for items needed to complete the program.
Motion carried unanimously.
';;Z>j
Council Minutes - 11 - Tues.,July 19, 1977
F. Report of City Engineer
1. Receive_petition and order feasibility report for improvements
on homeward Hills.Road, I.C. 51-309
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution
No. 77-80, ordering preparation of a feasibility report for
improvements on Homeward Hills Road, I.C. 51-309. Motion carried
unanimously. -
2. Dedications Minneapolis Floral Company of Lot 16, Block 7,
Westgate Addition, for street purposes
City Engineer Jullie retluested that this item be continued.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to continue dedication
by Minneapolis Floral Company of Lot 16, Block 7, Westgate
Addition, to a future agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Report on Riley Lake Road Improvements, I.C. 51-305
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to receive and file the
report from City Engineer Jullie dated July 14, 1977. Motion carried
unanimously.
G. Report of Finance Director
1. Clergy's License List
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the Clerk's
License List dated July 19, 1977 with a special notation made
that the Peltier Kennel License be approved for one year with the City's
option to withdraw the license if complaints are received. Motion
carried unanimously.
2. Payment of Claims Nos. 6238 - 6405
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve Payment of
Claims Nos. 6238 - 6405. Roll Call Vote: Bye, Meyers, Osterholt and
Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Dutch Elm Disease Policy
Continued to August 2, 1977 Council meeting.
B. Resolution No. 77-93, requesting the State Tax Commissioner to correct
assessment inequities
Continued to August 2, 1977 Council meeting.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to adjourn the meeting at 12:20 AM.
Motion carried unanimously.
5 J 56
•
MEMO
TO: Mayor Fenzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: August 12, 1977
SUBJECT: Utility Improvements
Eden View I and Kurtz Lane Areas
I.C. 51-300
As directed by the City Council at the public hearing on July 19, 1977,
the attached letter and response form were mailed to all of the proper-
ty owners involved in the referenced project limits. The response received
to date is as follows:
Eden View-Kutcher Area (94 units, 91 owners)
Yes, Alt. II 431 units (46%) 43 owners (47%)
No 29 units (31%) 28 owners (31%)
No response 20 owners (22%)
Kurtz Lane (30; units, 22 owners)
Yes, Alt. II 14 units (46%) 7 owners (32%)
No 9§ units (31%) 8 owners (36%)
No response 7 owners(32%)
If the Council desires to approve the project or portions therof, adop-
tion of Resolution No. 77-90 would be in order.
CJJ:kh
Attachment
REVISED 9/5/77
X.C. 51-300
Assessment Alternates • '
ALT::SU:NTE I . .
Under this alternate, the Edenview-Kutchcr area and the
Kurtz Lane area would remain as separate projects for.
' assessment purposes and the rates would be estimated
as follows:
•
EDENVIEW-KUTCHER AREA . i
$5,476 per single family lot developed '
. prior to June 22, 1971
$8,714 per double bungalow lot
$6,476 per single family lot developed
after June 22, 1971
KURTZ LANE P.REA
S4,660 per single family lot developed
prior to June 22, 1971
$7,490 per double bungalow lot
$5,660 per single family lot developed
after June 22, 1971
ALTERUATE IT •
Under this alternate, the Edenview-Katcher area and the Kurtz• 1
Lane area would be combined into one project having uniform
assessment rates. The City would assign 25 additional
assessable units along the north side of townline road i nd
the east side of County Road 4, thus lowering the per
rates. These rates are estimated•as.follows:
$4, 70 Per single family lot developed
- prior to June 22, 1971
$7,355 per double bungalow lot
$5,570 per single family lot developed .
after June 22, 1971 •
•
J.l- .
) , l
RESPONSE FORM
SEWER AND WATER INP'ROVEMENTS
Z.C. 51-300
Property: Lot Bloc): Tract
Addition
Street Address
To the Eden Prairie City Council:
The undersigned owners of the above referenced property
have been advised of the two alternate assessment methods
for the proposed City sewer and water improvements to
serve our property.
wA request the Eden Prairie City Council to:
Order the installation of the proposed
imrovements based on Alternate I
assessment method.
Order the installation of the proposed
I1 improvements based on Alternate II
assessment method.
Il Do not order the improvements •
I ' under either alternate. •
Signed
Date
• Please complete and return in the enclosed'stamped, self
addressed envelope on or before Aug. 10, 1977.
Aug. 16, 1977
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-108
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF VALE
WOODS FIRST AND SECOND AD-
DITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Vale Woods First and Second
Addition, dated June, 1977, a copy of which is attached
and amended as follows:
is found to be in conformance with the provisions
of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting Ordinances and
amendments thereto and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
• 1
City of Eden Prairie •
Public Works Department
Engineering Division •
•
CHECKLIST FOR REVIEWING
PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENTS •
Date August 9, 1977 L.D. # 77-P-21, Z-21
1. DEVELOPMENT NAME Vale Woods •
LOCATION South of Valley View Road & east of Westgate
Addition in south 1/2 of Section 9
2. DEVELOPER Dirlam Properties
3. ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/PLANNER Westwood Planning and Engineering
4. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW Rezoning application dated June, 1977
5. PROCESSING SCHEDULE: •
Application received Watershed
7-25-77 Planning Commission Duman Rights
City y
Park & Recreation 8/16/77 Council
6. PROPOSAL .
6.1 I I PUD Approval U Rezoning
6.2 n Preliminary Plat
6.3 Present Zoning R1-22 (North 1/2 I-General (South 1/2) _
6.4 Proposed Zoning RM 6.5 (1st Add.) RM 6.5 & RI. 13.5 (2nd Add.)
6.5 Previous PUD # None
6.6 Previous Rezoning Agreement # None
•
- 2 -
6.7 Single family detached lots:
2 less than 13,500 sq. ft. Density
17 13,500 sq. ft. or more Density 2.6
22,000 sq. ft. or more Density _
19 Total SFD lots
Multiple Dwelling Units:
• 121 RM 6.5 Acres 55 Density 2.2 units per acre
RM 2.5 Acres Density
121 Total Malt. Units .
6.8 X Owner occupied X Rentals
6.9 Homeowners Association proposed No
6.10 Other uses proposed None
•
6.11 Requesting City to provide streets and utilities the Developer
has not requested City installation of utilites.
6.12 Consistent with City's Comprehensive Land Use map Yes
•
7. PROPOSED OPEN SPACE, TRAILS
AND PARE DEDICATION •
7.1 Parcels to be undeveloped as open space Outlots A, B, C & D
t
•
7.2 Trails (Location, surface type, ownership) The Developer
has been requested to install a pathway from Valley View
Road to west boundary of Plat. (Refer to Planner's Report,
dated 7/14/77.) Ij
tII
.
•
3
7.3 School/Park sites None proposed
7.4 Park dedication fee As required through Ordinance #332
upon issuance of building permits
8. PROPOSED STREET SYSTEM -
8.1 . Check City's Comprehensive Street Plan O.K.
_ 8.2 Access to adjoining properties The Developer is proposing a
connection with Ontario.Boulevard through dedication of Lot 16,
Block 7, Westgate Addition
8.3 Street R/W and pavements widths 60' required on main
roadway through plat. 50' required on all other roadways.
' 8.4 Private streets None proposed
•
8.5 •Street grades, sight distances at vertical curves, concrete curb
and gutter Sight distances at entrances to Valley View Road
must be verified. Concreee curb and gutter required on all
streets.
8.6 Street names Verification by Engineering Dept. required
8.7 Parking (Ord. #141) O.K. .
8.8 Traffic volume'Impact on existing streets Approximately
775 ADT's would be generated upon completion of Plat. (Refer to
Planning Report dated 7/14/77.)
•
r;7i.)
•
4 _
8.9 Frontages on collector streets Approximately 26 lots
would front on main roadway. 60' street R/W with no front yard
setback variances recommended.
8:10 Other comments
•
9. GRADING AND UTILITIES
9.1 Range of cut and fill maximum cut ± B", maximum fill ± 10' .
9.2 Significant land features to be preserved low, marshy �as
located in OUtlots A, B and C
9.3 Drainage ponds
As recommended by Watershed Dist.
9.4 Flood plain encroachment Flood Plain elevation is 840
9.5 Dcdelopuent plan showing proposed grading, storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, watermain, minimum floor elevations, pond levels and
representative soil borings. Detailed plans and specifications
of all grading and utilities must be reviewed and approved by the
Engineering Dept.
9.6 Skimming and grit control for commercial parking lots N.A.
•
- 5 -
•
i
9.7 Sewer and water service to adjoining properties O.K.
1
1
9.8 Sewage lift stations required
9.9 Landscaping, buffering and lighting plans Required •
9.10 Natural gas, underground telephone & electric Underground
_Utilites required
9.11 Other comments
10. VARIANCES REQUESTED Variance from the minimum lot size require-
ments will be necessary. No setback variances have been requested
•
11.. OTHER AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL CITY APPROVAL
x Watershed District DNR
Minn. EQC Minn. DOT
Henn. Co. Metro Council
Adjoining Community •
• i
•
i
— 6 —
12. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED AND PENDING Levied; #5627, Trunk
sewer & wtr. $38,220.00 (deferred); #5617, lateral water, $1456.00
13. OTHER REQUIREMENTS •
Environmental Worksheet •
X Rezoning Agreement •
X Developers Agreement (PUD only on Final Plat)
•
•
•
•
67,0
•
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -4- July 25, 1977
V. PETITIONS AND REQUESTS
A. Vale Woods 1st and 2nd Additions, by Dirlam Properties, request to prelim-
inary plat approximately 50 acres into single family and double lots and
to rezone the property from R1-22 and I-General to RI-13.5 and RM 6.5 .
The site is located south of Valley View Road and West of C ti NW RR.
A public hearing.
Mr. Peterson stated the project is a joint venture between Dirlam Properties and
himself. The project is a single family and multiple mix on approximately 55 acres,
20 acres of which will be open space. He stated no lots will require variances
and the project is consistent with the Guide Plan'and the 4/5 Study. He stated
they would like to have some credit against the cash in lieu of ]and based on the
land they will dedicate to the city as open space and will be negoitating with
the staff. lie added that a strong demand exists for double units in Eden Prairie
and he believes this project will be very desirable and compatible with adjacent
uses.
Schee expressed concern about the construction traffic which will be using Valley
View Read. Peterson replied the construction traffic will have to use Valley
View Road but the road is already in need of repair.
Rob McDonald, Morehouse-McDonald Real Estate, stated he believes the land is more
appropriate for residential development than industrial and a strong market exists
for double units.
Lynch noted the 7/22/77 letter from Voas's and directed the Secretary to record
the letter in the minutes and to file it. (letter attached )
Schee asked when the 2nd Addition would be started. Peterson stated they hope to
grade this year and begin improvements next year on the 2nd addition.
Lynch asked if lot 16, Westgate Addition, dedication for road purposes had been
approved. The planner replied it has not yet been approved by the Council as
the item was pulled from the agenda by the proponent.
•
•
l(2
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -5- - July 25, 1977 •
Sundstrom inquired if the lots abut the railroad. Peterson replied affirmative
stating the lot depths are about 175 feet.
Motion_1:
lynch moved, Schee seconded, to close the public hearing on the Vale Woods
1st T, 2nd Addition preliminary plats. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 2:
Lynch moved, Schee seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the
rezoning from IGen and R1-22 to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 for Vale Woods 1st $ 2nd
as per the staff report dated 7/14/77. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 3:
Lynch moved, Schee seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the
preliminary plats of Vale Woods 1st $ 2nd Additions per the staff report dated
7/14/77 , contingent upon the road connection through lot 16 , Westgate
Addition, to Ontario Boulevard. Motion carried unanimously.
McCulloch congratulated the proponents on a- project well planned and needing
no variances. The other Commission members concurred.
•
•
•
•
•
• I
. cp,„,,,,, 0?,? /q 77 ;
�t�� .0.c 6,&.�.
70.. A
•
Grin Z.eJ. _,,z::. . G.i..-c��/ o•,-7-4-c_e----rc.
c
G✓y.°mac. .'--',--c-
/' / / i :'•� -J 4 L!.C� ce ` rJ --�.
_ .
,
i^ v �7tiG,,-C, - ye.... 45,
/ A / ( t.
%icei b _.4,.,.,t... li)7L't, /C2 a *'---T� om
/ --r-� .°
•
/ ,y'--,.,rf-mot I
L.
•
lid,
Zçc?; /977
' i
7v���
•4e6.
ex
'7AA-7ar",„/
2)a-f-J
/S2'd 7 d'�`�
•
•
•
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission • •
FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant
THROUGH: Dick Putnam, Planning Director
DATE: .July 14, 1977 -
APPLICANT: Dirlam Properties
PROJECT: Vale Woods 1st G 2no
LOCATION: 54.5 acre parcel located south of Valley View
Road and east of Westgate Addition and West of
Purgatory Creek.
REQUEST: Rezoning from RI-22 and I-General to RM 6.5
in the 1st Addition and RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 in
the 2nd Addition. Plus preliminary plat approval
BACKGROUND
The northern half of the site, presently zoned R1-22 was given
that designation prior to the adoption of Ordinance 135. This
parcel was placed in Planned Study at the time of approval of
Ordinance 135 and has since lapsed back to R1-22.
The southern half of the site was zoned I-General at the time. of
Ordinance 135 adoption. No applications for land development are
on file for these properties prior to this present application by
Dirlam Properties.
Land Use •
The project is hounded on the north by Valley View Road, on the
West by Westgate Addition, on the East by Purgatory Creek flood-
plain and on the South and East by Chicago-Northwestern RR.
PUS• x=' _ '�' ' \J • 1:
SITE LOCATION �+ ji k`'4t'Rr• \-�
MAP ;: �` .
nwrnwm �1'
•
VI i , is • y.
Jtft4 1.141
•
( •` • ( \\
Staff Report-Vale Woods 1F,2 -2- _July 14, 1977
•
•
The Westgate Addition a single family housing area to the West
of Vale Woods is zoned R1-22 . Along its eastern boundary lies
a large outlot which separates the Westgate lots from the Vale
Wood lots. •
-
S,
One single family home is located just west of the northwest corner
of the project, south of Valley View Road. •
To the east of theproject is floodplain dedicated to the City by
Edcnvale. Across the tracks to the south and east is land zoned
I-General and Edenvale's Industrial Park.
The 1968 Guide Plan shows this area as low density single family
residential. The 4/5 Sector Study, adopted as a reference by the
City Council in 1975, shows the area as low/medium density residential.
,
Density •
•
The project is submitted at an overall density of 2.18 units/acre,
121 units on 55.3 acres. Vale Woods 1st Addition has 38 units on
14.65 acres for a density of 2.59 units/acre. Vale Woods 2nd
Addition has 64 units in doubles and 19 single family units for a
total of 83 units on 40.65 acres at a density of 2.04 units/acre.
A maximum density of 2 units/acre is permitted in the R1-13.5 District.
Zoning Request
The proponent requests rezoning from R1-22 and I-Gen to RM 6.5 on the
1st Addition and Rht 6.5 and R1-13.5 for the 2nd Addition. No vari-
ances from Ordinance are being requested.
SITE ANALYSIS
Access, Circulation •
The main access to the subdivision will be from Valley View Road.
One main road runs through the property from the north end to the
southwest at which point a possible connection to Westgate Boulevard
exists through one of the Westgate lots. , If this 'access opens up
it would provide a connection with TH 5.
• It is estimated that upon completion of this project about 775 ADTs
will be generated. This estimate is based upon 8.5 ADT/single family
home and 8 ADT/per double unit. This amount of traffic could be
handled by Valley View Road so it is not necessary for the Westgate
road to he opened for traffic to be successfully moved to and from
the subdivision. If the connection to Westgate Boulevard is com-
pleted access would be available to Valley View and TH 5 on Westgate
Boulevard and to Co. Rd.. 4 on Westgate Drive. The connection to TH 5
will be a controlled access.
The preliminary plat indicates lots platted to the 33' from ROW on
Valley View Road. The staff requests the proponent dedicate an addi-
tional 17' ROW for the future upgrading of Valley View Road. This
will require some lot size configuration changes for these lots with
a common boundary with the road ROW. 0 id
•
Staff Report-Vale Woods lfr 2 -3- July 14, 1977
•
•
Soils, Topogra3hy, Grading -:•_...•..r�:—•--- 'Ls.. - ''
. ` ..
Bw/ ,9uC t
8fC'
WC
The soils on the site are made rpy L, cl Swa �r ��
up mostly of the Gray Series H cc -�^� y
and Marsh in the low areas withlec� e 'C o "/ ii e`
other smaller areas of buildable„�a .•i c- \s'
soils of the Series: Braham , HID j A+ �' `
Minnetonka, Shorewood and swe P\ eq.,
Heydcr. The soils are gener- oA ere swa 14. '' 1
ally sandy in texture and well �'o °' l_
drained with the exception of Etc a Ma KnD
the smaller areas of Minnetonka- ; ,o� u `--�-
and Shorewood soils which are u, p, i7 Sun
low in sand content and poorly mr H. ` wcip, /VJ 2 ' Hc�'
drained. 'e HID o . _ v ,�/ /
, , i.
Most of the soil groups prom- .,; ___. - ,t°
inept on the site have poor to T�. M.;,..- .• a, .,
Ms
fair bearing capacity so the i••�kr�\+• '- 'a -
staff recommends fairly wide Co aj�'.'^ �:" h, Ete .•/EiC
footings. Drain tiling around • : !. •'. .2114v •(°' 1/
the footings are necessary due .:�-2 e
to the proximity to watertable. .' K���]]] �-%' t—Hlc�
The development areas roughly ,-�,,.,, ',''-'. /�
correspond to the buildable
soils.
The site is made up of 2 "islands " of buildable gentle hills
and swa]es surrounded by marshy lowland. Most of the 1st Addition
drains to Outlots A & B while about half of the 2nd Addition drains
to Out lots A G B and the other half to Out lot C on the southeast
side. The Outlots, A G B , 1st and 2nd Additions, have a large •
watershed area emptying a large drainage area in Westgate Addition
before running into Purgatory Creek. The drainage to Purgatory Creek
is interrupted by the proposed main roadway through the site so
a culvert will have to be installed here according to City Engineer
specifications. A storm sewer will empty the large drainage area
in Westgate' into Out lot A of Vale Woods therefore no interruption
of drainage shall occur.
A small depression is located just northwest of the most southern
cul-de-sac. This node presently drains across what is proposed as
the road connection with Westgate. From here water sits on the south
side of the abandoned railroad bed. These depressional areas should
be filled and drainage problems handled to make the area more suit-
able for residences. .
The grading in of the main road will require a considerable amount of
cut and fill. Across the marshy soils the grading plan shows a fill
of about 10 feet with soil being borrowed from other higher areas.
Other than the grading for the roadways very little grading will
be required for homesite preparation. , I
Staff Report-Vale Woods 1 8 2 -4- July 14, 1977 ' 1
.,,
_-- ) - t VALLEI(- ' VIEW"�^ READ_ _
•
,i, ,,,,i/ .,,.: .... lit.A N \ ,:::.-__..,....;
! I f/-_J \i y
\- , -• • -
- • \ *c....\\K k\I\N'•,. V...1.:,.,-----\
Lots 1 $ 2 shown in 1::.,ti -_` i
Figure 1 will require j �\P .. 4 - --y'A• - _� -�.--:. l!�-
a certain amount of / '� + �.: `•
fill to at least �• 1 1 cs6�• J ,`__.-- -r--•
Wring the building ; J � ., + :_�
pad elevations to a 1 / �V" • ."1. Nam'.. �` \••• � \w_ \\I
reasonable level. � •
r � /'•. ±- _ l
The floodplain eleva- -/` ' t '(4/. \ 's l� � ti
tion is 840 and as 1 1�i ,- :/J� Sa ` \. ••,
shown in Figure 2, ' / ti �� ��;- �� "' -«�:
following page, lots J ��" :� \ t.
1-6 have a small ` i.r ` 1 )„,; ' ltr _
amount of floodplain \ �- 1 --• ra -
encroachment. A \. �. `'-`rti� (r,. ,/ . ! lS '
permit is required �` t �� _/ ,t„� 1 .` Al
from the watershed : \ - '+9 .- _ �� 0^' -�
district before any f • .-'cam i --�- -
filling can be done ! `'� %V in the floodplain 1 •� \ r / )
areas. 4. `-' '
• - /!" FIT'Cio
,
•
�•' (-.�+--1- ``-ram. .-J.- • p`N��2°•
I
/ . . .. ../. .. _ . .. 7 . ';..... ...-----
( I • 1
• s
Staff Report-Vale Woods 1G2 -5- -July 14, 1977 i
i
/
i •
�•\�\1.,. k j% �o% /' f tea' -
elt
`, y 1 � i
• ti7. C)
[11 0 -"—C ,
/ .. • -.
(.. , ,--, 1, ,,,,...,. \ ., ....--\ .-g, ..-- . '"..' • . -.. •
\ ...t .
'r •
1i ' J• ' t
,, yI , 1 `• y y� J i
a llltltltl -':�' - '/jam
•
j)J.iS •
•
\ ,
:Staff Report-Vale Woods 1F,2 -6- July 14, 1977
•
Vegetation
The site contains diverse vegetation species and habitats. Some
of the upland and the western end of the lowland (Outlot A) is
-wooded. Marshland and rolling meadow make-up the remainder of the
site. Grading should occur in a sensitive manner to save trees
and generally help maintain the natural open character of the
land. Erosion control measures should be implemented during
grading and construction and ground cover should be established
immediately following construction either by sodding or seeding.
Pedestrian Circulation
. ,
i
The staff feels that a trail — , ,.y ;: ^'J`o, (; ;:,,.. .., ,
should be built along the main ci] �� )y).5,o\1, '��•!.a! .
road in the plat. This trail ••o R `a, r.;,i i, I.� id
will feed the major trail planned �'�•-4-,..4 .�� �,.j.J
for Valley View Road when the ��/—•� f -Frilc r Tr
,,,--
upgrading of that road occurs. _ iTh.��. 1 • Pod-� �•
A trail easement of 12-15' should . • .a ,- 4'ePptdd�o ��, y+;
be established by the developer . 1' . Ast- . \\� • ty'3_
from the rain road to Outlot D ,�.. \. Cow?:- j4
or Outlot C to allow highschool \ ". �\ 1� 1
students walking to school a safe ok '
crossing of TH 5 at the railroad
underpass. At present there is u
a worn path crossing TH 5 at off/ o
Fuller Road and another at the
railroad underpass. The staff _ i.`►tA 2nd, dual r,;;
feels that this trail easement �f ;;
would encourage more use of the 10 - b_ •
underpass as a highway crossing. 04 .1'•.?'
See Figure 3. 1 :,-.‘ f%
a
,�(�, 1•'
r�y ! , '••' • . 1st & 2nd Adeilions
_ly``7 h� • Mom Havwwn Do..lopr
•
Staff Report-Vale Woods 1 8 2 -7- July 14, 1977
•
•
.Cash Park Fee
All lots in the subdivision will be subject to the cash park fee.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning staff recommends approval of the request, as follows:
1. Rezoning from R1-22 and 1-General to RM 6.5 for the 1st Addition
and RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 for the 2nd Addition.
2. Preliminary plat approval contingent upon 'the following:
a. Proponent dedicate additional ROW per City Engineer's
specifications to accommodate the future upgrading
of Valley View Road.
b. Payment of cash park fee in the amount agreed upon by
the City staff.
c. A trail be constructed along the major north/south
roadway as a feeder trail to the future major trail
along Valley View and to provide trail access to TH 5.
A 12-15 ' trail easement should be figured out by
the devcloper to channel the trail traffic to a safe
crossing of TH 5. (as shown in Figure 3)
•
d. Filling should occur on the lower lots to bring all
building pads to an acceptable elevation. Minimum
floor elevations for each lot should be submitted to the
Engineer's Office before final plat approval is given.
e. Temporary erosion control measures be taken during
grading and construction to prevent excessive erosion.
Ground cover should be established immediately following
construction either by sodding or seeding.
•
•
•
•
•
JEJ:jmj
' •t.+ rr`i . . -..��. , Ott! l• t .♦-_y' .i .._ __-._ _.._...._�..r
a,. .*
development plan••
--.- II---a-.!.--,"‘
."'•.�.-- 01....'.3-�. ; .
—
070tb-,,_ 14-1, „":„ "
•ics,,,,&<2 ;i;,s.,,cop._- ,-"\_-..,41.4.71
,.,....;:::/....>, , .,t .„
!•••••-1-N----:•-;5\\.,C? , .
•
r ..ma• y ,
/(2nd Addition '+ s
/ .. •
\ fry•
'�
>y i
w � L
Y
:-_-_-_-- ,•r , +.tom f `
;. 1st c; 2nd Addincns
r • a Dirtam Properties - Developer • t,.
rL r t _ _ Sit
r` ` ! "s r I r• •ir
8/I)/77
•
MINNESCYrA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL
ENV1Rodicurhh ASSESSMENT wORKSIU>1.:r (EAW)
AND NOTICE OF FINDINGS
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE
• E.R. II
NOTE: The purpose of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (RANI) is to provide
inforn.ition on a project co that one can assess rapidly whether or not the
project requires en Lnvironment;:l Impact Statement, Attach additional
pages, charts, male, etc, as needed to answer these questions. Your
answers should bens specific as possible. Indicate which answers are
estimated.' •
I. SUMMARY
h. ACTIVITY FINDING BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY (PERSON)
OY,. Negative Declaration (No EIS) L Jri EIS Preparation Notice (EIS Required)
•
D. ACTIVITY ID'LJITIF'IC:TION
1. Project naaa or title Volcnan3o
• 2. Project proposer(s) )7irrpr Pipe rtic'
hddrenc 7768 Mitch:11A Rnxt_p(1^n PrDi_tii� , )ri4 5i1 q
Telephone the ber n.n) Area Code ( fi12) .941;1.O4e
•
3. Fesponniblo Agency or Person p,nll1:_1?i1:len,
lsidrers 57,3!1<. --
Person in Cesponsiblo Agency (Perron) to contact. for further information.
on this SAW! i.ro:,.1 I2. cyron Telephone...341=5 rin.
4. This ELH e:nd other supporti.nq documentation are available for public in-
spection e.ud/or copying at: Location 7768 Mitchgl.1 fr .d
Telephone 9!,!•_7.0A, HoursMi p+ to 5 p.m.
5. Reason for SAW Preparation •
•
F�f Mandatory Category -cite_ - Petition Other
' ` -' M ,b
tQC Rule n�:ace(s) Cti 11 _ t^. •
•
C. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION SUMMARY •
1. Project location
County Won;Uip City/Town>hih name r:dn,-, pr;,iri• '
Township eurter_1.16 __(North), Range Number 22 Fast or We^, (circle one),
Section number(S) 9 Street address (if in city) or legal descriptions '
•
,:'1'r-
7.)
•
•
•
4 2. Type and scope of proposed project: The project proposes 121 residential
housing units on 55.3 acres of property.
3. Estimated starting date (month/year)__ mauut, 1977
4. Estimated completion date (month/year) October, 1978
S. Estimated construction cost $200,000.00
6. List any federal funding involved-and known permits or approvals needed
from eech unit of government and status of. each:
Unit of Government flame or Type of Permit/Approval Status
(federal, state, or Federal Funding •
regional, local) _.—.--
•
None Ncne Nane
•
•
•
7. If federal permits, funding or approvals are involved, will a federal EIS
I10 YES
be prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act? �_ _UNKNOWN
II. ACTIVITY OESCRIPTZO`1
A. Include the following maps or drawings:
1. A map showing the reyiunal location of the project.
2. An original St: x 11 section of a U.S.G.S. 711 minute, 1:24,000 scale map
with the activity or project area boundaries and site layout delineated.
Indicate quadrangle sheet name. (Original U.S.G.S. sheet must be main-
tained by kesprinsible Agency; legible copies may be supplied to other
FAR distribution points.)
3. A sketch map of the site showing location of structures and including
significant natural features (cater bodies, roads, etc). •
4. Current photon of the site must be maintained by the Responsible Agency.
Photos need not be sent to other distribution points. I
B. Present land use.
1. etiefly dune,ihe the present use of the site and lands adjacent to the site.
The site is present_Jy mastly opn field with wooded areas as shown al the
develop ont plan. 'aye area west of the site is residential. 2')te area
North and East of the site is park and the area to the South is Industrial.
2. Indicate the approximate acreages of the site that are:
•
A. Urban developed .p.fl acres f., Wetlands (Type III, IV, V) j ft acres
b. Urban vacant 0.0 acres g. Shoreland 0_n acres
c. Rural developed 0.0' acres h. Floodplain (i.0 acres
3G3
d. Rural vacant 0.0...acres i. Cropland/Pasture land • acres
•
C. 1)enlgnated itucrc 0.0 acres j. Forested 2 n Peron
at.ion/Oven Space
- 2 - 0:60 •
• 3. List names and sizes of lakes, river:; and stream:: on or near the site,
particularly labes within 1,000 feet and rivers and streams within
300 feet. The closest Lake is Pound Lake, which lies approximately
1 mile West of the site. Purgatory Creek directly Northeast of the
site and approximately 6 acres of the site lies within its floodplain.
C. Activity Description •
1. Describe the proposed activity, including staging of development (if any),
operational characteristics, and major types of equipment and/or pro-
• ceases to be used. Include data that would indicate the magnitude of
the proposed activity (e.g. rate of production, number of customers, tons
of raw materials, etc).
The deveiopn nt will be nude into 2 phases. The first phase will be
.19 deubl.e hose lots in the NorUiwastcrly 15 acres to be developed in
•
• 1977 end Phase 11 will be 19 single bane lots and 32 Bauble hare lots
on the rcitii_niny 40 acres to ha developed in 1970. The lots will be
marketed to individuals and builders for hare construction over a 1;
to 2 year period.
•
2. Fill in the following where applicable: •
a. Total project area SS 'iacres g. Size of marina and access A.A. sq. ft.
or channel (enter area)
Length `k miles h. Vehicular traffic trips
generated per day 950 ADT
b. ;lumber of housing or
recreational units t27 _- i. Ntanber of employees
• 2 st1�-Li. Water supply needed 45>{10°ya1/da
C. }leight of structures j• PP Y _
Source:�•+�ltyypz l
d. Number of parking ' _
spaces , 21 unit k. Solid waste requiring
mesa._
disposal -320 tons/yr
a. Amount of dredging cu. yd.
1. Commercial, retail or
f. L.iquid wastes requir- industrial floor space Nonesq. ft.
Ong treatment 36,0001al/da
•
III. ASSHSSI1ENT or POTCIITIAL EtNIROICIENTAI, IMPACT
•
A. SOILS Mil TOPOGRAYIPI •
1. Pill the project be built in an area with slopes currently • '•
exceeding 126? ...KJo Yea
2. Are there other geologically unstable areas involved in the project,
such as fault zones; shrink-swell soils, peatlandd, or sinkholes? yjNO YES
3. If yes on 1 or 2, describe slope conditions or unstable area and any
measured to be used to reduce potential adverso impacts.
•
3 _ 1),n(
• 4. Indicate suitability of site soils for foundations, individual septic
systems, and ditching, if these are included in the project.
No septic :ystunas will be u<ged. Soils on building site will provide
adun uatc bearing capacity for 1 and 2 story dwellings.
5. Estismte,the total amount of grading and filling which will be done:
8,000 cu. yd. grading 8,000 cu. yd. filling
What percent of the site will be so altered? 5 it
6. What will be the maximum finished slopes? 3 to 1 8
•"7. What steps will be taken to minimize soil erosion during and
after construction? Slopes will be seeded end mulched or sodded to
prevent erosion. Thaiparery erosica omltrol dikes will be ozlstructed
where nco.ssary to protect against s�riil ntatiort.
B. VEGETATION •
1. Approximately what percent of the site is in each of the following
vegetative types:
Woodland 1 % Cropland/ 0
Pasture
Brush or shrubs _ZF i Harsh
•
Grass or herbaceous ra t Other none 4
(Specify)
• i
2. now many Aerec of forest or Woodland will be cleared, if any? acres
3. Are there any rare or endangered plant species or areas of unique
botanical or biological significance en the site? (See DNB publication
The Uncommon Ones.) X N0 YES
the species or arca and indicate any measures to be used
to rcduco potential adverse impact.
C. FISH AND W1LDIATE
1. Are there any designated federal, state or local wildlife or fish manage-
ment aicas or sanctuaries near or adjacent to the site? ,JLNO YES
2. Are there any known rare or endangered species of fish and wildlife
on or near the cite? (Sec PNIt publication The Uncommon X NO YES
Ones.)
•
3. Will time project alter or eliminate wildlife or. fish 1i NO X YES
# habitat? The project will not effect the natural lvatlanTerea. 40'd
.of the project will be act aside es natural area.
4. If yeu on any of questions: 1-3, list the area, species or habitat, and
indicate any measures to he used to reduce potential' Adverse impact on
them.
et habitat for small mammals Ouch as rabbits end gophero, ground nesting birds
and door will he displaced. Thnsu animals and birds may relocate on the
project° open ::pace.
1
i
1
a
• D. HADROLOGY
1. Will the project include any of the following: 1
If yen, describe typo of work and mitigative measures
to rtduco adverse impacts.
a. Drainage or alteration of any lake, pond, marsh, NO YES
lowland or groundwater supply X
b. Shorn protection works, dane,.-or dikes X
•
c. Dredging or filling operations A roadway fill X )
will cross the lei area at its narrowest point X i
d. Channel n;odi.f ications or diversions ` , t
o: Appropriation of ground and/or surface water X r .
f. Other changes in the course, current or cross-
section of water bodies on or near the site X
2. What percent of the area will be converted to new impervious surface? 10 % '
3. What measures will be taken to reduce the'volume of surface water run-
- off and/or treat it to reduce pollutants (sedia>snt, oil, gas, etc.)?
A culvert will be placxl under t fill which separates the watershed
area into iswo areas. This culvert will be sized to slow the rate of
runoff to the creek, thus providing a natural clarification area for
norirl runoff.
4. Will there be encroachr:ent into the regional (100 year) floodplain .
ny new fill or structures? NO X YES
If yes, does it confero to the local floodplain ordinance? NO . YES
Apples.liatrwly 1/3 acre of floa:iolain will be filled.
5. What is the ,wprorisits nrni.mun depth to gronndwatur on 2 feat
the site? A heaver dam has temporarily pounded water on sours
of the floodpluin. This is not harmful to the building area
); . WATER QUALM
1. Will there be a discharge of process or cooling water, sanitary sewage
or other waste waters to any water body or to groundwater? _NO YES
Etna if yes, specify the volme, the concentration of pollutants the
water body receiving the effluent.
/procc:;s water-no • ' / torm.eater no
�'rnsl en SeO]oentat ion controls as
/cni.fee water-no approved by Purgatory Creek Water-
/san.sewer-yes
(Pietro write ircallaold flat to Mn. River) shed District)
waste 2. If discharge of eater to the municipal treatment system is
planned, identify nay tonic, corrosive or unusual pollutants
in the wautewetur.
N.A.
•
3. Will any Binder-in bo generated by the proposed project? X NO YES
If yon, specify the expected volcano, chemical composition anmethod
of disposal. .
' : (3
. 4. What museums will be used to minimize the volume:: or impacts identified
in questions 1-3?
,
Erosion control and sedimentation removal before entering Purgatory Creek.
5. If the project is or includes a landfill, attach information on soil profile, i
depth to water table, and proposed depth of disposal. .
. N.A. f
r. AIR QUALM Akin NOISt i
1. Will•the activity cause the emission of any gases and/or particulates --
into the atmosphere? NO X YES
* If yes, specify the type aid ociyin of those emissions,-Indicate any •
emission control devices or macsures to be used, and specify the approxi-
mate nieowtcs for each emission (at the source) both with and without the
omission control mca:;ures or devices. There will be norricl exhcust csc ionions
from construction equipment during construction. Following construction the
project will genurato approximately 900 automobilo trips per day and cmineiens
from heating 121 homes. •
2. Will noise or vibration be generated by construction and/or operation
of the l',ieject? ._)1.....f:G 2:1'c
to If yea, describe the noise soerce(s)j specify decibel levels [dB(A)3 , and
duration (hrs/del.) for each and any mitigative :u.a;ores to reduce the
noise/vibration. During construction noice will bo genoratod by construction
equipment. Approanato noise levels within 50 feat of equipment will be in
the rangy: of 90-1C0 db.
3. If yes on I or 2, specify whether any moose sensitive to noise or
reduced air quality-(hoepitals, elderly housing, wilderness, wildlife
* areas, residential developments, etc.) are in the affected area and give
distance iero coerce. Purgatory Crook is a wildlife area which is about 600 •
foot fame the construction limits. About 40, of the land will be reserved
for open space which drains into Purgatory Creek. These areas will not bo
significantly affected by censt•ruction.
C. LAND RESO'=CL co:Qsnvvi ioN, ENLOGY .
1. Is rely of the site nuitdlo for agricultural or forestry production .
or cur::ently in ouch use? - NO _X YEE
If yes, specify the acreage involved, type and volume of marketable crop
or weal produced . ut the quality of Lho land for uuch use.
55u of the sae t:vuid Ua tillable for drops. • t
2. Are there Lily known mineral or peat deposits on the site? X NO YES
If yes, v;ecify the typo of deposit and the acreage.
•
3. Will the project revolt In an Incroa.od energy demand? t1O X YES
Complel.e the follot•`^^ a° apu'icablot
121 res:ic3_ait.ia1 hones will increase the demand for energy. •
a. Energy requirements (oil, electricity, gas, coal, solar, etc.) •
•
•Entirated Peak Demand
Annual (flour) or Daily) Anticipated Firm Contract or
T)•pe ltequirenr,nt Sneer Winter Sopp)icr Interrreotible llnuic?
Nato-al Gas 1.8,000 m_f/yen; N.A. 1 120 i.-_f/C ly Minnogasoa Pine contract
Electrica]. 13Gm )c.w. 1160,000 kt N.A. N.S.P. firm Contract _
par year par day fi _ •
I .
b. Estimate the capacity of all proposed on-site fuel storage.
•
None •
•
•
c. Estimate annual energy diatri.bution fors
•
space heating 50 u lighting 75
air conditioning ?p 4 processing (1 6 •
•
ventilation r. 6
d. Specify any mr,jar energy conrorvation systems and/or equipment
incorporateit into thin project.
Al). hoc a will he insulated to exceed Minnesota State rccivi.rementh.
Solar heating nay be inoorforated on scan hams.
e. Whet recnadery energy nee effects may result from thin project
•
(e.g. more or longer car trips, induced hoeninq or bumino:Inca, eta?
The project :.hould reduce automotive travel by providing affordable
howling near to lie Edna Prairie ciployr nt canter which provicias
about 4000 joa., wad only approxi.n otoly 20% of those families live in
• Eden.Prairie.
N. OP'EN SPACC/n::CIO:ATlON
1. Aro there any designated federal, state, county or local recreation or
open space areas near the rite (including wild and scenic rtvsrs, trails,
lake accoaset;)? ' _fi_NO YES
If yes, lint areas by ware and etplain how each may be affected by the
project. Indicate any nnaeur-es to be uued to reduce adverse impacts.
•
- 7 -
II. TIUINSPOIfr1.TION used transportation systems
1. Will the project affect any existing or limp
(highway, railroad, water, airport, etc)? will bfacted. YFor
If yes, specify which part(s) of the syaten(s) ;
these, specify existing use and capacities, average traffic speed and
it percentage of truck traffic (if highway); and indicate how they will be
affected by the project (e.g. congestion, percentago of truck traffic, 1
safety, i.ncreesed traffic (AUT), access requirements). It is anticipated i
that many (11. the ROT generated by this project will ba neighborhood trips
•
which will exit. unto Valley View Road and County Road 914. Valley View Rd.
and TH 4!5 will receives moat regional trips or trips to and from work. Those
trips which would be in the range of 300 vpd will insignificantly affect tho
volumes an Valley View Road of 900 vpd with 10,, truck traffic and T)'.'5 with
. 15,000 vpd and 2O% truck traffic
2. 1s mass transit available to the site?
y, T7O YES'
3. What measures, including transit and paratrena'.t services, are planned to
reduce adverse impacts? .
Park and rids service is available at TH#5 end Mitchell
Road which is about two miles from the site
J. PLANNING, LAND USE, COMMUNITY SERVICES
1. 1s the project consistent with local and/or regional comprehensive
plans? NO _y_JES
If not, explain: .
•
>ecial use permit is necessary, indicate existing
If a zoninh change or rl
zoning and chsnyo requcutad.
Zalillg will ba revised fru% Rural to Rm 6.5 and R 13.5 .
2. will the type or height of the project conflict with the charaaccter ofYthe
existing neighborhood'!
If yea, explain and describe any measures to be used to reduce conflicts.
, • 1
3. flow many employees will move into the area to be near the project? __
How much new housing will be needed?
4. Will the project induce development nearby--either support services
•
or similar developments? It will provide needed housing.
If yes,explain type of development and specify any other counties and
•
municipaliti,ls affected.
•
5. Is there sufficient capacity in the following public services to handle .
the project and any associated growth?
Amount required
Public Service for p121oc:t Sufficient canacl,4:'?
water. 145,02n. gal/da Yes
wastewater treatment 36,1100 gal/da Yes
seWor 4200 feet Yes
schools 25 pupils yes
solid mete disposal 26.5 ton/no Yes
streets 0 NO miles •
Ynst —
other (polies, fire, etc) 113y g _ Yes •
If currant major public facilities are not adequate, do existing local
plane call for exp+nision, or is expansion necessary strictly for this
one project and its associated impacts?
Public facilities are adc uate for the project.
1
•
6. Is the project within a proposed or designated Critical Area or part •
of a nO ated Actions EIS or other envirovnenta).ly sensitive plan or
. prograri reviewed by the EQC? . x NO • YES •
If yes, specify which area or plan. • .
7. will the project involve the use, transportation, storage, release
or disposal of potentially hazardouo or toxic liquids, solide on
•
gaseous substances suds as pesticides, radioactive wastes,•poisiene,
etc? X NO YES
•
If yes, please specify. the substance and rate of usage and any measures
to be taken to minimize adverse environmental iml',acts from accidents.
;
•
O. When the project has served its useful life, will reti�rrementt of theES
facility require special manures or plans?
If yes, specifyt
K. HISTORIC RESOUPCES
1. Arc there any structures on the cite older than 50 yX rNOor on�federal
or•etat:o historical registers?
ES
2. Have any arrowheads, pottery or other evidence of prehistoric or early
settlement been found on the sit.oOaffected,
Might any known archaeologic or paleontological sit be yc NO ed5
by the activity? .
3. List any sito or structure identified in 1 and 2 and explain any
. impact on them.
•
L. OTHER ENVIRONMF.N11L COHCEru4s
Describe any other major environmental effects which may not have been
identified in the previous sections.
Woe.
•
III. OTHER HI'CIG TWC ;.tiw'ASUn S
Briefly r:eecribo mitigative measures proposed to reduce or eliminate potential
adverse bep:.ctc that have not been dencrib.:d before.
Forty 1 rc2:tt of tiroo project in reset t i for n._tt>ial cnvi.to!mrnt and habitat.
The 1erai_n'1ot' of the proocct in plareicd to require an absolute minietrn
grams{., Orin fill area will las plat.d acrO!c a lod area and will bo used • .
as a limiting structure to provide a c ttrollod rate of. runoff to the .
Purc atozy Creek Ploolplain.
.
. I
10 .
V. FINDINGS
The project is a private (X) governmental ( _ ) action. The Responsible Agency
(Person), after consideration of the infoonati.on in this LAW, and the factors
in Minn. Keg. t7EQC 25, make:; the following findings.
1. The project is ( ) is not (X ) a maj...r action.
Stet, reasons:
It i.s a relativ..7y :ana.11 housing project which re:ierves adequate
open spa.c.. and rc.d res relatively little grading. •
2. The (iroject does (T) does not ( X ) have the potential for significant
envlronv,.?i tal effects.
Stale re:.ronn: •
The inc11:..ica of t,.:'_ e'tx: natural. opan ::pax and relatively little grading
,_. along with minor disruption of vrcor3.ed areas will net significantly effect
the envjscr:;u1t. .
3. (For private actions only.) The project is ( ) is not ( ){) of more than
local significance.
State Itensons:
•
IV. CONCL11SIO iS AND CERTIFICATION
NOTE: A N:.g7,tivo Decit.rat.ion or EIS Preparation Notice is not officially filed
until the date of publication of the notice in the P:Qc Monitor section of
tyro Minnesota State Register.. Submittal of the I:AN to the EN constitutes
a request for publication of notice in the 1-QC Monitor. .
A. I, the u0deraigned, am either the authorized representative of the Responsible
Agency or the Respon ible Person identified below. based, on the above findings,
the 1te:1 ansible P,.;cncy (Pennon) makes the following conclusions... (Complete
either 1.or 2).
1. X NFS.ATIVf DI'C:L 1:AT1ON NOTICE ..
No CIS is needed on thin project, because the project is not a .
major action and/or doe,: not have the potential for significant
enviromnontal effects and/or, for private actions only, the
project is not of more than local.nignificance. ,
j.(,1 .
- 1.1 — .
2. EIS P11:1'AklTION NOTICE •
--An LIS will be prepared on this project because the project is a
major action and has the potential for significant environmental '
effects. For private actions, the project is also of more than
local significance.
a. The HEX Rules provide that physical construction or operation of the
project must stop when an EIS in required. In special circumstances,
the IitQC cceoe..clfically anthori..e limited construction to begin or
continue. If you feel there are special circumstances in this
• project, specify the extent of progress recommended and the reasons.
•
•
•
•
b. Date Draft EIS will he submitted:
(month) (day) (year)
(t.LQC Rules require that the Draft EIS be submitted within 120 dam_
ofpublication of the EIS Preparation Notice in the EQC Monitor."... If
special circumstances prevent compliance with this time limit, a
written request for extension e;:plaining the reasons fur the request
must he submitted to the EQC Chairman.)
c. 1'P i•: :t EIS will be prepares by (list Responsible Agency(s) or
Person(s)):
Signature
Title
Date
B. Attach en affidavit certifying the date that copies of this EAW were mailed
to all points on the official EQC distribution list, to the city and county
directly ir.pactcd, and to adjacent counties or municipalities likely to he
directly iupr,ctcd by the proposed action (refer to question III.J.4 on pogo 9
of the r'J1w). The affidavit need be attached only to the copy of the SAW
which is sent to the GQC.
C. Billing procedures for Fla' Itinitor Publication •
State agency Attach to the EhW .sent to the S;7C a completed OSR 100 ,
ONLY& form (State lteg.irter General Order Form--available at Central
Stores). For instructions, please contact your Agency's •
of ricer to the State Reraic.ter or the Office of the
State lu•gister•--(612) 261.-6hi9.
.. 12 _
';,) J6
\r‘y
( ,
i ,
I p
r
L_ 1 a ,, c, e0
1
J
M[NNLPIN '".,\' I 1• 1/ �y,,� wnoNn+oia� ",�• A
--f `zz::, .....i1 t vl rii ! F` ___e.r - j.,,•»- "o ,
.a,_�.� t
_. 'ram'�. ` I > i Q ^
: ��_ i- —=:,-,. _ ° •'''.. II 'T °si.?duo '' d
hJyll1 i -.ice.• 1 '''' V J: t ]
, •• Jam, T Cf o o i. 1-
. ;;;rr?'4. . i _- cl
tuner, •I�� � .':Y� 1.� y4 .I•
C . . ' �1 1 N.�.- .�..
-...-0--J1"")''-J7,; )-T
. ,.
0
,...,___ ,.....„\
\ /1 />`l l__�� •-:,,1. ,tip ``\1. ✓'
--- l� : 4,--�/*./,1.. 1_1 1 /J 1 1
i J/ n 1 �"9 cif
!;fir/ ?- 1 .._. ,l` i }�, — i -
O r 1
r' •);,, 1 Y c:c, t o , -- -.1 ,-1.-----/ ,-(1-1-i;.
•
•
• MetropoUUt; n Location
,a["Jf G
1
0
••••••••••••••••••••••••••
f .
4V) i4 t r 7.:t r 73
.. i 1 tilt
o tn,, 11 • •
..),P
• '§ • .g ' i..,:';••,?
. . ' =,,q,•
Iiii 0 0
:.• -
' t-t*',-\ y . fz:•.1 -I 0
_c. _1 . ..%,nj.L. .___:_________—_,F,„_tc.--- -- 1.:.i.i .... •;:„
• i'v . • ci.. " i 'I_ .'\-,, ,'„ iiC F.:, 0 )› .
•
z r 1
.. -.-.
• • t .--......"t.7.:7
•t- 7-el) • c)i 1. l'ii''' 1
. .
•
' 9--IT''' —A '5''---;'-- 1 • • •
. ' • _9— .I'', `' • • L• ... • ? • • ) 1
' I , • - • -'/.
•• Y k
• .1. 1 r ti i '', 1. . ' . . • l' . I r '
0 ;• "Q- \'\•,...-'; " '. . '.:''' . •
' —I . ,'• • . . . •. . • ., „).•'.;:u,;'2.
11'‘ s, :,....'..-- -• '.. 1----. . . 1.. .,vk; /....., . II 4)41 • ' • ' . • .•
• - )•-
•..,--- 1, i.(.-.,-),\)' .z,...2.•. . • . .. ..
-LI-. • \ ---,•‘-7 :A.,',.If c,„.)-1); ,tf,. ,. . • . I •. 1 , .
L\. I r t •:. ., y-?;,- ;.; ;:;,::. •.1; ‘,1:,
„
• t.):1 r- :)„ ...P j.,) . a I (Yt.';'',.:,?,"0„;,..C.7 ' ")::.p.' . ' .. T. .• . . .
. •• .o ,:), , .-, ;..).-.-1,',?,,T,, ,,.(... '"----.1.'..1•'.• ••••14' .. :; • ' • • ‘ .
•-----,- •i•\ -• -..-;•••"..-f--" —771.; ' ••.-s.,:.1.:71, . ).../.'.•.. ••••". z_;/.. • .' . • i L.,..s. ••
, • • ........;....1 Nv .-. . i.' f.n.1::•)::_:_: -_-. .•,,,../..4.:11:,;.....2..,:la-.--/ . . , . .: ,,,,,?. •
- - cS, : • :'.•.c`r,: -....:•.: -1....'f'.‘ ; A:.•••:.'!''r )11...••••o• - •• •• ' ••••k....:: <-: 7.4
1 .0
0 F P . 1.• 1-•?''.....',.-: ,\*.-1::(',-1-'-ii1;. ..<:}. 4..:L.........,;:. . ,-.--it ;•... • '
• 1 ,1 :J. ii ,
. . ,,' r.'• Y\--- ;i., -;-..---. • '....,:,-;:-,::...,R;•;.:.A.;.;;...s: -;',,;,.....;',:v;:-, •:•::• sa •-•71/. . .. c-
• , I.,'
.. .'KY:" ....yr,..,-t r 1..:•,..1.,:„;,,!.... ,,,,,, .... .. . 5,,,,, . . ,.,, .
' ' • 4.,c,A1 i- ' ',-;._.;,:L,;',,.1,,.:.....':-.' ',.'!!L'I.:-.,..-'''..-',-."-,".7---r ,1 ,, ;,,„.•.......'•j ..4"el
. \1,1-1, • .1...));''.':—.-"---...:: ..177.t..:.•,...,,'...:::....j.;;:j',!:,`..,,',..1.';., ..I)'....('..,.,i,..1:j.V,'''‘,..,...:1,..:,'.;1‘.,Z. 1'-,,72...:''.‘".' : • .. .,
.'''''',..: • - • ,•;19,' •1.."":“....1'.,': .'''\'.‘:.'....,1..<:,\ i.:.:;'.....,• '..ii;-....,:'i.5',-,',..:•.',."'.'"'':.f...,•.:.'-j..'..!.4.it . ' .
-- \ '' ---1 . .:.6 •' ''''''''.1.:i..tr.4'.‘:c''!;''. ,'..(',,;!..' 1 : ;r:::.',,';'.- '.'..:::.,i.1' •1"... ..:2':: I'. • : •,
.,.V ••\__.:2.-7c1,;L:,••-•-• -,,:;•;•;•••!:-'•::'.-,:,•-'',•-i,,,‘.•:••1,,,-,,f,;,,,itt7:7,::•..-:::','!!'',.-1„:,.•.J7,71,-;;I:!.:••:•;..r.• . . •T :
•7--",._,•-•ry,,,-...t7(„.,. ...,...,:.:•,..:,.,/,,,,,,'•. ,•-),':,::(';'.••:,••„:„:-......-:,',',.1.:..a,L..,:.;;",,i,1 '-';';',"......:.,, ,•.:,••,,,,,..:.,.,,:,4-.,•i:. .,..,•.• • •.....y.
'"";;".;',./-i:.•&!,.,:P.::::•::..,t;:...;•:::: :::\'7';'.7•7 '..*::•...'.'",'•:;(1?..".?,t'l•.••',•'..'-',n'.'.,i'''''',7.N.'c.:;;i'. •‘::::::.:::. .'..,
: .,..:.....:‘,„;.... 1,....;;....s;:,...ii:;i,.!,-;2:Ls:;;:. __•;!..;-...;.;;,-..) ..-.' .'.:;;;..,,... •. ,;,;,1..,.i...,..: ...::!J;•-...;‘,..„.....,-:;,,,, ,..!--;
.........:.„',..4; ;,,, ;7•'7.•.-,. ........,,,:',.If;,-,,1.-r; .;:''-';:;:; '..-',"]-;';,-,-,;.-',.-....-7(---;:-;--;I:.:',-;-...:..-; :t..;•;f1 ,-,. ',.•• '
••:lf....., l',.:•••,,..:„•...,;;;:,J:,i.:„:-.,:,,..,•.,,,.i•.;: :.i',..-.:•-•:-•:::.± , . „::•;5.,,!..,•,...t.:,:i, ,,/
. .. ' •'''.',•,,•..,i:-..",'.',.'',.''.:.\.•'..,..:.-..:.
l o:,,.,'',,,.,.,.:.;.',:.,..:..::.''.'..,.Z..,.'.,.:;.::,-::f:I::,:‹,‘..,..‘.,..I,,1...-,:,..•,::,....,........,.,:..,-„,y.±:•:-::.;':,__\,:.,2..,:,;,_.,..'..i,.:;.',..,......„,:..,,7..17t'.,..:;..;,••..•.,.,.!:;-,-,.,...;.-...;:,;-:.:-:..I.....;c:;7.,./...>.,:,.,:••_•,'-i-..•,.:.:_:i•;:,, ,-;:,.1••.•1-7
: : ' •
.,.0..,.:r.q..'..:.1'.:2.z.,:,•,'.w..',.....:.;.•: •••':.-j;.2•.,.,:••',:'.T\' 7
\ , •
,j ,. 7 ,:'r - 17 ' ?
I .
r f
y :r
. f s- ,1 ,,,:',.-‘,:t„-5x.•
•.4; ;.•,,11::;. ':1:";;, .'.1.1 ;.::‘,'''''- '' e ' j.'''''" ...•
---•.;,1;,-0,t, ;;.; ;;•:,...:,. :;., . .;„:..:-:;,;,:.1: - . —,-7,--). --,-rt,
•.:1-Fr.7--t--.i::-:;•,,,-- ;• .; .-..v,:::,..!;,.....-...J.-::-.F,7•4„.......,, 4•,.,41:,..,.....___:-..(„%.,;,,,,,-.::
. . • ;:;;_c i_... •k.•:,-;;;.'s-1;••• .:. :12---1...- •t.--;;;;,:;2.__.:-.• ..!..r. -11 .1- ' d.,..'
x .
Ai '' - ::::-...4%:.i:77..7.i''.4. ..',:l'''q:',.::::,,i;"!..';'....!t-hj:i;1:cf't'-.1-7:71(` ci,..,
. :• ..-....,,,,,,•,,,-;-- .:, '. ''..c....4........--1•A••, 1;,...0...:.•'.::.i,...,,.N.,::::4-
...-,.t,-'," ,-,`.1%,•.L, ,/.'••• .k.:..':.--,',.:.•..- ,1.,,,-..:,‘•,...i...IA ..'..,,i •
---:1 ..-'••-•.1,),1....•:,!,...-1:-\•:(„,..... r,-;-,:i. :....r, 'i . ". :..11..‘i
1. 1.,::,,,:,?,,'",,'"::,,,,:.......,:i.:..•;••:•:,.4•;;;,..,,:rir.I..'[:......L.-..:L...1.—.. ••?......•.,';•x%)....E....;cc, )4,,,,:,,......y,. . . • ., ..-..., , ,,... •
-...,..!!! ,.., •
,—•-,,-.-,,,,,,/7 7-•----;!,-:...-.77‘.\,,.....:::, -:,.:,...,... ;.,-', I -A • ,.• • -1
. : • • )'' i. '''.::,„-.i:'• ••••••• . ".'... '::iii,:,:;.4i:,t-t,••..,:4-.47-zt:-.K5 ;,•,..,,,::,.,..c.i.1-4/.',,:.,„,-. ‘ . . .1,-)`,P,".). (''( X(/ '.i.' ,.. . .......: ,• • •:• .:.:i...,, ii...1-1...41.1-..1::.• •,!! . ,
• 1\ v.1 . ,?.k: • •.• 6, •:. •••• . (,..h....••••.:•... I, •.; .'.':./.
.r.. -\-',•‘ •11." '
t
'.1
. 1
Ti-4 4..-...)'' -7. -''' :°;,",",),,,!,,,:q.,, ‘s) ',, -- ,,),•kHnr
, , ,,,,,, , .„, - , ,;• ( ‘._...—,1, ,& ).,,-, / ,, "N,:. k..A..\.,- V;......c:
....!•;,-.',',."''''-,,','\,-'' ''''4„, , k,4'',14;'11„ s• , •I';,.' 1)!‘) 1 ,:'r_r_il' i..ti;":?: k;'-1_._.1 ^,`,;.ff: 1-,.;•1, :-..:. .
I 0 co ( I
ill?)c'' -:-)C I.',. ,1'. , ..\>'.C` ,t'1,2:.,c ' :,/•'ct-.. .-.''....,-1-.-c i!.,)-
: .',,!--i. .-••,',.-.!.,),`,'s--:,... 1,,'1,1_,I. c7.,,. -`.,`,, , `' ,,74 -1 ):,,• :,• ,:, 1' VI
•
it.....,:/:17...'''.,,.1''''''' 1‘;,!',::/•,'2._-41(i:).':."':.:-.--.<':.):„.,17\.....:\:',.:":\(.7:-)1.7,1'1.'.:-;::..,!...,;•\\:-.S'ircjt: l'f,' : ,.:‘'.::: , ..12-'-1:.;al''
ftit's''-f, if 'i - '') .-"'''.1,.,,.. 1,....:•,',, r .•,' ., ..:A.) 1,...-:.''41(,....• ',. "••• '$, Po .
\-s ,' - •''-' .,4 4i ' ''' - (,.. <0, '..\.:;, (,/ .. : ,1).14,,:.1 41
., . ,:). • .1,, '` '-, ', , , .• A, t-,-C7 -..,../ ,. ', , t
\_..,_. .:\ ",,,, .. t , AAA'd'‘.0
'' r f ' ' .,\ A. .. (,' I Z. V' ,-ti .,.C.' .-.: :,.%,÷,.......1;..7'. 1.„.,, • .. .'V.. (sA., (6' '. I' '' : ' 2(4 ''
V'''', -'''\•''S. t' / r (".1:.', 's\ / '' -,... '' 1VS,.,,,,....,r,i.,
''''()--. i'.• , -/ '' ,1, ,,,'t' ,,--/f,s, ,‘ ,',zi..1..).)'!)— -;-,-.': .4'.."
c---Tsis. ;.:..) ''/I:i I-'•,-1.--ii.j; :.\''-''..;':'- H' ) f‘--- 's .t•n `.i'::-.( c-- 4
rjs),)\.",7)-..):. ' • :' li' '•''f'Y-4 l'.° .);.1,\,-.-..) c 4 /,Y,'...,.?.„!4,,:z.:-,3 (..:
'----: ''')) ".. "''' %' •"•'..-" ..',,,,q .\..1,2k\ ,:r\‘,, , ;---, 0'.,...... ''..-',',kr -,- ,J
%/r, _)'')'`":. ki.:,:‘, '.1.';'-';',',•?:',,,:.1;•\--=;• ,''‘, .,.';'''',,' ',,c).;,,I, r,1`, ,V't' ',_____,'. ' ':".`;',
, /?:;:c7:.--11' 7. 'I \ '''''i\",N- -":!, '.- 7')',.'•,',,:','''..'°.1k ''
Nl"------..s.,:,,J., i.;, .'.... -.,.;.,..!.• . - ;\,,,, ;_):1,.,,.-,.........1) .......i...--;.;::..)•2.1,-,.,;.,,s,:..",..:.Alt▪,..4.4 ..,, -,,i.i';4---!:''•:-''''''''"--:"..''--''-.1:;'• ?c)(...'. 7.. '''ikli'..'\''''.-.7`
- ---.C' ).,,Q.t ,,I<;",',<," .3 ..).'". c?).,-,---T,r-f.,..,:,.t'1.-';' 1.9.);'',.;,-..;%\.;•;4, - ,,,,ri --)i -'( ''3// ,1,-/-/' ',',-\4 ",'''..,`''01'., (..f1,;.,c.';() ::,'„' -..41'.,„.'.'- '' ',-.?-1:-,%-•.:,\-,-;. 4
J1:';,-;1 ' 7e,).,-.‘?) - (,,: ,,•, ijey,fo,;,\,, rv-ks,,,-% '-'..‘T.,.i.Tio
A' /..4A .,''.4 .).'• ,
,‘;..'..)''';' 0,, i , ) '',-':2,4'', O /• V(4,A;',):',---,',
1
"/)- 44/ .:..''' )
.._/4. r' ; (' '-. 1'''.1 ''"i 4 . •,, I
;.,,I \ ,t,;.,,,. ,s e,./..4..e.,/,...,,,,,,,,
_____. ),4.._._J;-_-_-_-:,-
'..,\-,...--1-) /• ,....,
. k,
-... _, ..,,,,,-) i,...., (,,7.\ ,\• //-: 0/' >f \,.•):,'-.c.,.;:_,--\•')‘1.)..`"' .-)
'-_-21 Y_/-^f ..i'•.\..,_-`,\---- .... ..) ,'(,.?'. -.;.,`tA'''t 1 f.---,,),),.),',...,1", e
'i.
' -- -,'">--"•-•••• " •••• ,.,...., '_::- , ,' 4 .p, 1> s.--,!.. `7_.',-v..•
•,--;.---,.------,f,,,, ..„)..7.,..,;;..,.:-..-. = --7.,-.f,...-.1 ,i ' . r,•,--•
Llik.-2 '4".• i'y ‘, :-,',H.') _,-;-. ',-..-...f•, If •:. •i•i-I\ ‘r2.4... - •
..5;,':.-..,.....4•• .-:. - •/' ),I - 4.''' •.- ;\.'..0. f ... -II-- '"-•'•' \) - • • '
1-;;<,:'/Y ,..'.,c' '',;1; •`;`f .- f, 1-.'Ac.^....,..- ". ,r... -----
c(;--- \'>-iT
. ,1 „ ' • `.;l,'' „ ?\.'(",. .i.n,
1.1
.
(._ . it ) i ( iy-, ','iN',•9 ;., 1$,\'\iyy,- '\,.'.44•4•••"I z.... /,` , F.. rn
7;4 10/ J '_//i,/,,.1\y, cr-V.V,;"?'0))1"1.,:.,,,,',(;,•......';,:
/..1 '. .."''. :!,'-,'.. ., •=-'4.,:1-.-.....--.:' •-•-•-."----.1_,---,•;.; : . ::',••.'1._ .3 Pi
v UI, (----(1.)-V ' ' ''''‘.'`"-J''r.4 '-' ..-"•---'''''',' ':'...it'e' 1. :i/,',.C‘-(0..' (4'... .1,«;\"1-i,)\)\‘.._ . ,--'-''•'.,'.''.(.''i \ .......-... )•,; `,.....`.....";.--1',.;'1.;'..7.,'i;0
7' s'' 1' )-, Pi) .• 'i ' '1 .') I:' .-,,']•‘:. P‘•... • '''' V'',7' 8 z
, - ''..,..,.... -. -,. • .,.. 6.,k, ›.,/\r, , .I'''' .'1.={(.s,',v; -,,;;.--- ,C,`)t •• .•,, \ .t, , ....) •-- '.,i,. ..,-,•,,i 1.:,• 7,
?.( '
(••• '''‘ . :''''.'''' ' '')//' 4 "(I.'-'j I'': ''.icf ',' ‘ - '''': ',I.\'' ',.0- v 0
(,,••••' ' .•'• 'I' (?` ,* )/ ''`' A'4,1 s'6 -ffidst; ':'- ' V
‘ - ,,• ---.-1-----)t f„,, '\ ;.` i i, C...., . , ,,•i, y.:., ,,,, ,. )2 ,•(-.., ...) _
•:1 -''',1 ,, 's:-. •..‘ . I. ' .r.,), ,,,,-"t‘(.,„.CT r''-c'/ ".;3‘4,-;''''--,'"'\ ,-- '•-?f+ ','i I•''' ''1-'" L'''.-.'i.`:-'' ' l':' ''''
a (:•//... % -;,., v,. ...,) ,,..,. ..!,. ; ..:!, .,,, ,,.--,.. ;( ,.t..)„
;-; ., ,s ,L..), '... ...,,,, . ..: —.. 1., ,/ , _
,%,..,\ .—.,, ' .':-.'), f )
/_ ),,...,. II;,..,...L.,.i..):',-:-:4i:L.3'4. *..k.,
, . _(r ,-,. .1s y • " F•../ ,I„ :,';, '. , •,,I., ' t-... :... .:•"*.t.'',/ '
t ''. . {n''''' ) .`.1
,
1 .
,
dev . op. .
• -...-:-_—____-7----_-_-__=-_-_:_- ____.1- c.;:.!..$,:,-, (-1--,:::)) 0..-t-v6T.,
.. i i i ,,,.,,.,,1
co —
1 1 I.••,- 1-.-7,2 ;-,.: ,)0 .0-1,.,--,.)-.,i-
I _ _ 111-0_,-:
1, I
..,-,
f- / Tip ti--) Li-)%.5. e'''' • !
1,
15,,,,)
-
-.,V ,...1 V,0‘•
' h •'k(-"C).‘ . -''
0 - - •,. : 4 l'. i
'-i.....,-- • Li 'ziiill , 1,,.
...,,
•
•
" \—.,--• .- '•, `1X"-.)
•------") .
--
'...., / ‘.,.• 1 .t,„43:
2 rld-), AlcatIon tZg,),i-
-- __-
\ !
---- •417.;.,!,----\ \
..---- V •7.,,.,„,".....,:,,, /
/
,;,
VallocfueecIE
,,..-/
._-_„ , ,. ,....,.r
, 1st & 2nd Addition
1
--„,r.,, ., ./..,.
Dirtam Properties - Devolopet
...';' . '
.:".4
r.,
/‘; 'e VMS wet •
/ Immo.ombem
M...... *mom
4*.i.V tool A-00.6. .10111 om
61' ' • 71.r1—j", ==,:::-- 1
' 1)'
•
•
imi
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
•
RESOLUTION 77-111
A RESOLUTION FINDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WORKSIILET FOR VALE WOODS FIRST AND SECOND ADDITIONS
A PRIVATE ACTION DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT STATEMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie did hold a puhlic
hearing August 16, 1977 to consider the Vale Woods First G Second Additions
LD-77-Z-21,P-21, and
WHEREAS, said rezoning is located on approximately S0 acres of land
which is presently zoned I-General and R1-22, and
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning and Zoning Commission did hold a
public he-Dina to consider the zoning and platting request of Vale Woods and
recommended said request be approved by the City Council, and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council that an
Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for the Vale Woods First and
Second Additions because the project is not a major action which does not
have significant environmental effects and is not more than of local signifi-
cance.
•
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Negative Declaration Notice shall be
officially filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council.
•
ADOPTED this day of `, 1977.
ATTEST:
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
John D. Franc, City Clerk
SEAL
•
6a
I
• Aug. 16, 5977
CITY OF EI)EN PRAIRIE
HENNEI'IN COUNTY, M1NNJ3SOTA
RESOLUTION NO, 77-109
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF AMSDEN
xlLL,S sECOND.ADDITIQN •
BE 1T REV)LVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the pro).ininary plat of Amsderr Hills Second
Addition , dated5/5/77 , a copy of
which is attached hereto and amended-as-follows:
•
•
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of
the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and
aeondr:ents thereto and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
• Wolfgang H. Penzei, Mayor
•
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
•
Fit
City of Eden Prairie •
Public Works Department
Engineering Division •
•
CHECKLIST I•'OR REVIEWING
PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENTS
•
Date August 10, 1977 . .L.D. # 77-"-16, Z-19
1. DEVELOPMENT NAME Amsden Hills Second Addition
• LOCATION North of Amsden Hills Addn., west of Garrison Forest
Adds., south of Anderson Ickes Parkway
2. DEVELOI'F.R The Preserve
3. ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/PLANNER Bather, Ringrose, Wolsfeld, Inc.
4. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW Preliminary Plat dated 5/5/77, Pre-
liminary plans for utilities, grading e.nd street improvements dated
5/4,'7':.
5. PROCESL'ING SCHEDULE: •
Application received Watershed
5/26/77 Planning Commission Human Rights
Park & Recreation 8/16/77 City Council
6. PROPOSAL
• 6.1 Li PUD Approval IX I Rezoning
6.2 kJ Preliminary Plat
6.3 Present Zoning Rural
6.4 Proposed Zoning R1-13.5
6.5 Previous PUD # Preserve PUD 70-3
6.6 Previous Rezoning Agreement # None
— 2
6.7 Single Family detached lots:
23 less than 13,500 sq. ft. Density
10 13,500 sq. ft. or more Density
22,000 sq. ft. or more Density
33 Total SFD lots Total density - 2.2
Multiple Dwelling Units:
RM 6.5 Acres Density
RM 2.5 Acres Density
• Total Mult. Units
6.8 R Owner occupied Rentals
6.9 Homeowners Association proposed Preserve Homeowners Association
6.10 Other uses proposed None
6.11 Requesting City to provide streets and utilities No. .Streets
and utilities to be contracted by developer and dedicated to City.
6.12 Consistent with City's Comprehensive Land Use map Yes
7. PROPOSED Ohli SPACE, TRAILS
AND PARK DEDICATION
7.1 Parcels to be undeveloped as open space Wtlot C
(existing pond area)
•
7.2 Trails (Location, surface type, ownership) 6' bituminous
trail to be required on east side of Amsden Way. Outlots A and B
are trail corridors for grass paths.
•
•
•
- 3 -
7.3 School/Park sites Satisfied through Preserve PUD
7.4 Park dedication fee Refer to Planning Report dated 6/10/77
•
8. PROPOSED STREET SYSTEM -
Additional R/W necessary
8.1 Check City's Comprehensive Street Plan for Anderson Lakes Parkway
- 8.2 Access to adjoining propertiesRight-of-way will be provided in
2 locations to provide access to property west of site
8.3 Street R/W and pavements widths Amsden Way: R/W 60' -
Pavement 32'; all other. street, R/W 50'; pavement 28'. Dedica-
tion of Rill for future expanseion of Anderson Lakes Parkway should
extend to 61 feet south of the south edge of the existing bituminous
roadway per Planning tcmmissl.c„i recununen3YE3:on.
8.4 Private streets
8.5 Street grades, sight distances at vertical curves, concrete curb
and gutter Street grades & sight distance O.K. Concrete curb
and gutter required
•
8.6 Street names U.K. •
8.7 Parking (Ord. #191) N.A.
8.8 Traffic volume impact on existing streets estimate 280 ADT
additional traffic generation from the addition.
•
5 y9g
4 -
8.9 Frontages on collector streets 28 lots will front on Amsden
Way. 60' R/W and 30' minimum setbacks recommended
8r10 Other comments
9. GRADING AND UTILITIES
9.1 Range of cut and fill From utility plan - 8' maximum cut, 5'
maximum fill
9.2 Significant land features to be preserved Fowling area
in northeasterly corner of site. _
9.3 Drainage ponds Show high water elevation & outlet of pont
9.4 Flood plain encroachment None
a
9.5 Development plan showing proposed grading, storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, watermain, minimum floor elevations, pond levels and
representative soil borings. Grading plan has not been submitted
Solt borings will be necessary for some lots to verify footing
design at building permit tine.
9.6 Skimming and grit control for commercial parking lots N.A.
53ff°
— 5
9.7 Sewer and water service to adjoining properties Service stubs
__have been proposed to serve areas west of site.
9:8 Sewage lift stations required None required
9.9 Landscaping, buffering and lighting plans Usual street lighting
flan required
9.10 Natural gas, underground telephone & electric Underground
utilities required
9.11 Othar comments
•
10. VARIANCES REQUESTED Setback and lot size variances will be necessary.
Standard PUD setback variances are recommended.
11. OTHER AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL CITY APPROVAL
X Watershed District DNA
_Minn. FQC Minn. DOT
Henn. Co. Metro Council
Adjoining Community
I
- 6 -
12. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED AND PENDING Levied: y°6452, trunk
sewer & water, $52,640 (deferred)
13. OTHER REQUIREMENTS
Environmental Worksheet
X Rezoning Agreement •
X Developers Agreement (PUD only on Final Plat)
•
•
•
•
•
•
536Y
,)
•
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -3- July 25, 1977
B. Garrison Forest 2nd Addition, The Preserve, request to rezone from Rural to
RJ-13.5 and preliminary plat 43 lots on approximately 25 acres. The site is
located west of Co. Rd. 18 and South of Amsden Road. A continued public
hearing.
C. Amsden Hills 2nd Addition, The Preserve, request to rezone from Rural to
R1-13.5 and preliminary plat approval for 33 lots on approximately 15 acres.
The site is located West of proposed Garrison Forest 2nd Addition and south
of Amsden Road. A continued public hearing.
The planner reported that the staff is recommending the City not give up any
land for parkway construction that has been acquired for park purposes. He felt
if the City had intended the park property to be used for road purposes it would
have been included in the grant submissions.
Mr. Hess, The Preserve, stated they contend that 50:50 splits are the common
practice in road construction and in this case The Preserve is only asking the
City commit to 1/3 .
Mr. Hess then showed various design options for the 7 acre parcel near Co. Rd. 18
(commercial,residential, multiple or mixed uses),stating they would prefer the
land use option be left open at this time.
Lynch asked how many lots Were under 13,500 square feet. Mr. Hess replied he
was unsv;
Chairman Sundstrom asked if any audience members had questions or comments.
None were raised.
McCulloch felt other access options should be explored and land acquired through
grants should not he given up for the benefit of a developer.
Hess believed The Preserve is not the sole benefitcr , but the City and surrounding
communities would benefit.
Motion 1:
hedpath moved, Schee seconded, that the existing Amsden Road be the north or
western lane of the Anderson Lakes Parkway and that right-of-way for the
additional two lanes be dedicated from the property south of existing Amsden Road.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 2:
Redpath moved, Lynch seconded, to continue the public hearing on Garrison Forest
2nd Addition allowing the developer to submit revised plans . Motion carried
unanimously.
Motion 3:
Pcdpalh moved, Schee seconded, to close the public hearing on Amsden Hills 2nd
Addition. Motion carried unanimously..
. If
•
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -4- July 25, 1977
Motion 4:
Redpath moved, Schee seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the
rezoning request from Rural to R1-13.5 for 33 lots on approximately 15 acres for
Amsden Hills 2nd Addition.
Discussion
lynch inquired how many lots are below 13,500 square feet. The planner estimated
40-50%. Mr. Hess agreed .
Vote: Motion carried 4:1 with McCulloch voting nay.
Motion 5:
Redpath moved, Schec seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of a
modified preliminary plat for Amsden Hills 2nd Addition recognizing the road •
alignment change(affecting Lot 16) due to the road right-of-way. Motion carried
4:1 with McCulloch voting nay.
' i
•
•
PLANNING STAFF REPORT 51
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant
THROUGli: Dick Putnam, Planning Director
.DATE: June 10, 1977
• i
• _ 9
APPLICANT: The ('reserve
PROJECT: Amsden hills 2nd Addition
LOCATION: South of Amsden Road and West of proposed Garrison
Forest 2nd Addition
REQUEST: Preliminary plat approval. for 33 lots on 15t acres
and rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with Preserve
standard setbacks.
f
•
BtovgRC"
This preliminary plat is part of the original POD 70-03 and is designated
low density, single family in the PUD Concept approved in 1970. The site
•
is bordered on the north by Anderson Lakes Parkway, on the east by the
proposed Garrison Forest 2nd Addition, on the south by Amsden Hills and
Garrison Forest and on the west by open land that is in the Preserve PUD
shown as single family. Amsden Hills 1st Addition was rezoned from
Rural to R1-13.5 for single family construction.
Land Use
The site is surrounded on the east and south by existing or proposed single
family units zoned R1-13.5. The land directly west is presently zoned Rural
but is shown in concept as low density single family. To the north of
Anderson Lakes Parkway is ills acres of land to he developed as major public
park south of Anderson Lakes. (See figure 1 ) . Amsden dills 2nd Addition
is part of the Anderson Lakes Park System.
Density
The preliminary plat for Amsden Hills 2nd Addition indicates 33 single family
lots on 1S4. acres at a density of 2.2 ufiits per gross acre. The zoning district
Ill-IS.5 allows a maximum density of 2 lots per acre. 71ie smallest lot is 9,300
square feet, the largest is 21,250 square feet and the average lot size is
13,860 square feet.
Y
Staff Report:-Amsden Hills 2nd -2- June 10, 1977
ZONING REQUEST
The Preserve is requesting rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with PUD vari- • •
ances. The proposal is consistent with the PUD Concept plan .
The following variances have consistently been granted to other projects
in The Preserve zoned RI-13.5 and arc requested as modified setback .
standards:
5 feet to side lot line
10 feet 1-l', story house to side lot line
15 feet 2 story house to side lot line
30 feet front of building to front lot line
20 feet rear of house to rear lot line j
20 feet side yard setback for houses built on corner
lots.
50 foot: minimum from any building line on NSA County and State
Highways (fireplaces and overhangs shall not be placed in the
fruit yard and shall be 5 foot minimum from side and rear lot
lines.
Lot sizes vary from 9,300 square feet to 21,250 square feet and the average lot
size i.s 13,tsto . In Zoning District 1l1-13.5 the minimum lot size is 13,500 square
feel. A lot size variance should also be included in the zoning variance requests.
A maximum density of 2 lots per acre is allowed. Ft
1 if
-` .iy_ _ _ tl 4\(•
0 i1 J% ii . ANDS SON'--LAKES--z-. }}f
:c . Garry isrnt -
•-0 - .0 d : <
a 11�+ .
'n. I ry i e) '-�~` )t
GBtriSol
n
r'\- - Amsden lorert ]3.c
\ — — liilis' - •«.—
•` t -i.e; i."I! Prairie F•
` r:i•:,.!I ':> ••„ ,,,3 r
7✓ �..,.___•___ 1_i,.1 i' Prairie
�.r,.f h ii 1--- I ti �• ��g,_ Last 3rd
f i 13.5
•
•
•
•
Staff Report-Amsden Hills 2nd -3- June 10 , 1977
SITE. ANALYSIS ,
Access, Circulation
/unsden Way is the north/south street proposed through the site connecting
to Amsden Way at the southern end of the site which runs east and west through ' '
Amsden IliIls 1st Addition. This road connects to Franlo Road on the west
side of Amsden hills. Amsden Way also connects to Garrison Way which runs
east and west and north/south through Garrison Forest 1st Addition. Garrison
'Way presently dead-ends at the northern boundary of Garrison Forest 1st Addition
and is proposed to connect with Anderson Lakes Parkway through proposed
Garrison Forest 2nd Addition.
Two unnamed streets dcnd-end west from Amsden Way in the proposed plat.
These streets will probably connect up to streets of future proposed develop-
ment to the west of the site.
This project will generate , upon completion , about 280 ADT most of which
will travel north to Anderson Lakes Parkway which is proposed for future
upgrading to a four lane parkway. Anderson Lakes Parkway will eventually
connect Co. Rd. 18 with Highway 169/212 and Mitchell Road.
The staff proposes a right-of-way dedication of a line measured 89 feet to
the south from the existing north edge of the roadway. (See figures 2 8 3 ).
1• • /\`\' --r" � •:/
ci
— • -` -- . t tow lint pi�-T, ' 1
r }1\ 1I bry 25 f 4
71'N,�„ ..)s, k l i I i,;r n i/1 "/ �/ ;-,...CCtttttt).
t tip/ !/.� !''i!Jir1 >� h, _ 'j " ./ .,/\ i1
I /—_i 9 .- /',( /!Ii1///' / .\I_..jrC -„ /�//J�/') i ,,/ 1 1
/ / ,U y,•/ it ,I `I � -, �j ,. r . _`'1'') /
•
Fiji.'e' ......)*.- •
4 1\c'lih{.G� G t xu 4l Yfa.�lea
i/.r.,' vt. ti :,vi si e(wee
>22' mailAh
t
/ V
21F
..
•
Staff Report-Amsden Hills 2nd -4- June 10, 1977
Using parkland to the north of existing Anderson Lakes Parkway is a less
acceptable solution to the problem of building a 4 lane parkway because
of the following reasons
1. Anderson Lakes Park system was purchased with Federal LAWCON
Funds and a 4F,GF conflict exists with using this land to
construct the parkway.
2. Staff has agreed to construct a trail system on the north
side of Anderson Lakes Parkway waiving the need for The
Preserve to construct trails through the developments adja-
cent to the parkway.
3. An environmental impact statement would probe bly be required of
the city to use this parkland to build the parkway.
The staff feels that these reasons ace sufficient to ask for the right-of-way
dedication on the south side of existing roadway as indicated on Figures 2 Fc 3.
Soils, Topography,Cradinit
The site is gently undulating with frequent slopes of greater than 12%. The
entire north half of the site drains into the low northeastern corner desig-
nated eet'uc C on the preliminary plat. The north/south road on this lcalf
of the site follows the drainage scale which presently carries runoff to the
area shown as Out lot C. The southern half of the site drains runoff to the
West and south.
No grading plan was submitted except for the road profiles. Many of the lots
have slopes greater than ]n and may require extensive grading to establish
sufficient building pads.
The soils on the site arc generally well suited for residential development.
The soil series Erin are the major soils of the site with a loamy to clay
loamy texture. 'these soiI:: arc well drained but have moderate limitations
•for residential development because of poor hearing >" -inn. It '(
capacityand moderately high volume change with r' _ l/
changes in moisture. Slopes over 12% arc con- IS- <• " _r`e- 'I'�r ,,�•n!
sidcrcd severe limit at inn for development. ^ ' (r"e. tre,•{/``,a{ `el
�� (\rv,�\ .i ,
\\ Ne Ian \ ;?,.
it small marsh :Ires is located in the northeast l':'?\
, J 1 \'')1ii1 ncorner of the :•ate and is ::hewn :IS ,'ln outlet. ,� Lea l`at ( '
Another area of Glencoe soil is located t 1,po C . 4 r,,\l,\Nd.
directly in the middle of the site. This soil K. r,r: _. ,c,.�,e„1...\-
is poorly drained and i:; sandy to loamy in tex- ((''"'' F e l\:
tore with a hi eh orgainic cnn'c:at . The organic }1 .\ ,` I \ 'I I09 1-; '�a
1 , l t IA.
material should be completely removed and back 7 ri �l � .-.
filled with coarse material. ,The hazard for frost rTe.---�- ;-. �l1`/ 1\t./, --fr.,e
heave on this soil is high, ; ,.:-ice• / ,' j
ec:e.i)C1'4), 1.,:m 1-4-1.iii) ".li f.: -)\
'l r..e ��n, _ 'Ir
•
•
�V •
,'.111 /. Ifni\ ..,y !/
g, U ;,�--7 1)..t. ��rj,f J\:� it•.�
1 �N ,ti ,� I. '.V /
•
•
•
Staff Report-Amsden Hills 2nd Add -S- June 10, 1977
•
Mother small area of poorly drained soils surround the Glencoe soil to the
north and east. This soil is of the Cordova Series and is loamy to clay in
texture. Moderate to severe limitations exist for residential development .
on these soils because of poor to fair bearing capacity and high potential
for fast heave. Special preparation is also needed on this soil to obtain
suitable building condit ions and strength.
The staff recommends the developer submit a complete grading plan with
minimum floor elevations at each lot for the staff's review before the final
plat is approved.
Much of the site consists of slopespfester than 12i . Establishment of
ground cover immediately following or during construction where feasible will
prevent excessive soil loss. •
Vegetation
Much of the 151 acres on the site is wooded and a great deal of care should
be taken in grading and home construction to prevent any unnecessary tree
removal. Alignment of the roads on the site are dictated by the site
configuration but seen to correspond well to the major vegetation stands.
Pedestrian Circulation
The staff proposes a feeder trail to he constructed on the east side of Amsden
Way. This trail would be linked on the south to existing trail through Amsden
Hills 1st Addition and the Garrison forest Addition trail which extends to
rrai tie East northeasterly. This trail would "feed" the major trail proposed
by the city on the north side of Anderson lakes Parkway. ( see figure 5 ).
Rl:CfihlESIIATl OSS
The planning staff recommends approval of the requests for:
1. Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with lot size, density and setback
variances listed in the Planning Staff report of June 10, 1977.
2. Preliminary plat approval contingent upon the following:
a. proponent dedicate right-of-way for future upgrading of
Anderson Lakes Parkway as illustrated in figures 2 G 3
and discussed in'the June 10, 1977 staff report.
b. a grading plan be submitted for staff review showing minimum
floor elevations for each let before final plat approval.
c. Erosion control measures he taken during construction to
prevent excessive soil loss including establishment of ground
cover immediately following or during construction.
d. Grading should occur in a tens it iwo manlier conserving
vegetation, topsoil and natural landfurms whercever
possible.
e. The areas of the site with the soil series Glencoe and '
Cordova be adequately prepared (excavation and backfilling) to
support and maintain a single family home. Adequate drainage
must he provided on sites with these soil types.
f. a pedestrian trail he constructed on the east side of Amsden
Way linking to existing Garrison Forest 1st Addition trail
south to Prairie East and to the existing trail on the south side
of Amsden Way in Amsden lii11s 1st Addition. These trails should
be consistent with Preserve 'Trail System,
g. lots south of line A-A (figure 4 ), are subject to park dedica-
tion fee :is per city policy.
- I
90 •
• . ; i
: I- . .
, t. , . .
•
. . .
1; 1
• .,..... ,, „ .
. .
. ,, • 'I i
':-.••-•'..,:- • • •t• . ; !•••: / , ' i ,..•vi . ,
,... N',.y;',/,,..•,"..,,,- ,.,, . i 0,0-peT ,••-.. i,I,
. .
• "4),I. '.1't.•-a -,", ./ a
.\"••-•-•'-'" ?,/
i:c.; 1;'1,;:',,t . ° 1 .• r•,. '. ;Al ; • • • .
•I , ,' 4 /d'i 0•. \ ' . .,,..;:--• ,....e....:4-___ '..1-. ..i
• II/ , ^: . '..',, "-• . ,,
t.:`,....q.,,
1 (11 . 4
I' ' • • '---_,),,- ' ,. I __ r1 , . ,•\:, t /.,,„7••
I" i 1 ' • °, , '/
•/ 1 i 1 •' '/,. , .- 1 - ,- '••••''.i. • •
•,..,‘ ;,1‘,/ .,,, ii ,;•, „,.. , z)
••', 1-'.7-7*--' ,// ' i ii• '-I '::: '-- f '
I. -
•• / 1 (f ,1
I ... , \ 1..it , I,,,i.,..:,,,. ///, r,,,,i,!cil r.
.//.-.., •.. N./. L- \ ,,, if. .- * ,t!
',1') :..____i. : ' ` :!) / 40"70,
,. . , ,,,,1 \ ,,,•, \ ., ,,
',' il) ' \ --.'"-',.- ,\ ., I‘s. . ':::......'''
1.....1:1,, 1,•,,.\'-., g t, \: ,',.:. fl' \ ,..t. 1 t::: ; .
:, I .• •/ \ 0' il‘ '''',/ f
.,\ .,,,,, ,1,,,, 7...i•i 4, I i 1 .,',•,/ / _.1 ., I.
', ‘,.. .'." ','''i '/, ! :•6/\\ 11 '7'///' :
,:,:,..?,,,e.••••,•\',1,1‘,,. ., / ,,,,\,,. ,/ )0 li i, \, ,,i,./
. 1
.. 6 . . •!I i
•‘. • --:L.:.. .`,i.,..... --,----. ,,.- . ';.' 1 •,'\, , .
. ,
•
_-:--.... --•-: ...., .0' •-•.•-•1-L.,.\\ ,' Adili/',1:-..-•':::': .
. - - •.-.••N',, ;-"I',
- --• -... '," .0,,, •::,i;•••" • ., -':-/,../„••'21; 1
-• •-•.. , ,i ; :; , •, '1,4; , , •
s• ;it '• ;II • ;•• ; •••-' -' //77 -!.------'
......1
i, , I ',:1 '7'7'.....‘,. , 7-:'_,---,.', ,,,,, 4,.,s
,, ,I ii' .. ‘,... -' ''- y, 1•..7i, 1
/' , /- %.? ' fi ,' •,,--• .•1.',"::
, • a i ' " :..---
.
--
i.:1 / X. . '!,•-•: -...L•.' • • i/f t'i,-- • :
- •!,i) ; , , ‘",- •,.../, ,1:;,;.,i,/. .,i
."-'
::::..1: i l'i.7•..77 .'....."'t. ;i Z:2'l'1 r.,'ii: i'1 I
',''''// 1 I,'I I.!'-------7 ,;, '. ,,,,I,'•// , /1,-,', '
- --Id --•',. •••,1",‘V 0
----T.- ,i,., 4- ', 1. ,/ /',,
-., 1--,::_•..- ,,!., , /, ,..,,,,,••,,..,,,--, /,,,,,,/, ,',/
6 . ,
\ ,,„,,,„„ ,, , ,,,,,,, , i, „id , , \ : ‘; 1 , „, •
k.„. ,..,,,i), ,,,,, fr, -.• / .!: ,/,,,/,./.y : , ) \ ,
\ /:''''I I /7'//, '.- . , ''.....'•,..'/;:./-.,',./.' \I
i•'!! 1"-**. /.1 11 ,, ,....-'. '4,'. ./../1 ' , \ 1
I')Iiik)' '•''....-1,''"••::::,-'7."---'" tli::•i ‘... \\\ I
t 1'"" ''• .,/,. ,'.r 1 (1 1,•• •\....., \:\\, ..,'
:. '''s ' ;-."(.,,,...: ' i ' ‘ I ••:''' 1 ‘ \ ...__.
'''''.0:.,,,..•t....-7-...-....„.:. ll ‘‘ \ I ‘ \‘, . ''• I
. i
\b ....,,__t_.----•::•:.,. ‘"-4_ i *, \ \ `... tliiki
,. ‘, ,,
, r \ ,...,
...'o.'":// -..........‘ \..:
i • i / .......N___•_.,,,,. 410 , .. i
•
-It . • !
•
i•. ;.`.': .%.r . I- pr1?i.P S�O� — f17Wi'rbr7�A Ili 4 oVl� y
a
.\\\:-.\-11\1:1111,-,,.... . • .-\>-0." -..,./..z.:1?
T 1 71 �+.:
• (( ..�� ., \T� yvl.,t+T'°i-.-,-, r t ,�..I / .1 r1�' s. rh frr.
.;.p S c nsf Yt...+ . r .: ( .{{�^�' ♦ice ti..,
..�i �"^- }•. ��,. J'.� �pp:i ice.ti • ' '•'(+�,
Cl) •
., Y� 1 i `s"AR.rE,J`„A V Garrison ' ,� , r - . .
s ` I
.
4 a •'
"' 4 ` (\�' �> � a/.jr'•
t{t i''` Two G
., It c ,' . , j
ci •o';; •,t:—)'f j L .,.
--1 r
cc,- T `\ I -{ L`.i, 1.:.trl.� _
\1 ` Q' Hustad '"CO
C - — Development �� *"
//4` .j, �;r'•�Y,arl i /v• � '�•l 1� �rV
L.
d`.\,.:7\ '.....t........'\ ., T i
,,,, .,..,,,,, __ _ 1 . .
, ,
, . _:____,I, . • . ..
_._
1
r____
-• .J • ., :. \ •-•-k — 7
. . f 7r,',,e-`--.14-ecerve
Ll'i () • ' ''' '''''s "2:' ).; .../ 1111 I 1--.1, i i
• NOR 1 1-1 ;
,, ; r May 1 , 1977
- •� - f� �'� k
•
MEMORANDUM •
TO: Dick Putnam
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services) ,
SUBJECT: Anderson Lakes Parkway
DATE: June 13, 1977
Issues I've discussed with Don Hess include: •
1. 4f/6f land conflict - I've suggested that to find out whether or not
we could use parkland for road purposes would take months/Years. And
until we find out for sure (final approval by Feds/State/Metro) we
can't permit the Preserve to start.
2. The City purchased the MOORINGS including the road R.O.W. so we've
already put in more than our share of the R.O.W.
3. I suggested that the PRESERVE provide the R.O.W. for the 2nd 2 lanes
(61' from south edge of existing land) while the City would build the
Bikeway/Bikeway in the park.
4. If park land is to be used for road purposes we're probably in the re-
placement land situation (the City would have to find comparable
repla7,..:",t land).
•
•
�jl �'
•
Th:6.4rescrite
May 25, 1977
Mr. Rod Sundstrom, Chairmen
• Eden Prairie Planning Commission
City of Edon Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Re: Letter of transmittal
Development Stage
Additional submission materials
Dear Rod:
I wish to convey 30 copies of the additional development stage
• submission materials requested by the Planning Commission at
its May 23, 1977 public hearing to your attention.
Please indicate if you feel additional information might be •
needed. I will attempt to expedite your suggestions prior to
the next meeting.
Warmest personal regards,
T1SERIfy /L4�Fless, Jr., .LA.
Vice President
Architecture & Planning
DLN/jl
Enclosures
•
T/ !
A Total Environment Community—8920 Franlo Rd.,Eden Prairie,Minn. 55343—(612)941.2001
•
P.U.D. DEVELOPMENT STAGE PROPOSAL - by Donald L. Hess, Jr., A.S.L.A.
Vice President - Architecture & Planning
THE PRESERVE
Legal Descriptions - see preliminary plat documents
Zoning Cl;,ssifiectien - see application and preliminary plat documents
Proposal Limits & Location
Aist!irn UTi15 fr rrison II and High Point IV single family suhdivisions are
separate parts of The Preserve P.U.O., which are currently being proposed for
1977 development and occupancy. See graphic "1977 Single Family Construction
Projects."
P.U.D. Conformance:
The iorreding projects represent conversion in part of higher density (6 d.u./a)
planning area 5 to low density single family development.
Garrison II 43+ lots R (2.48 d.u./gross lotting area)
AWsden Hills II 314-- lots Ca (2.2 d.u./gross lotting area)
High Point IV reprasents a conversion of all "The Trails" remaining unde-
eAleecd IT; P.5 awning (154+ townhe"ses) to 36 single family let develop-
went. (2.12 d.u./gross lotting area).
P.U.D. Residual - See attached graphic "The Preserve Area 5" for a general descrip-
tion or residual use a tyilich is to be incorporated into the selling package of
Area 5 projects. The original P.U.D. concept plan will continue to serve as a
part of the selling package for all areas of the Project.
Special Soil Conditions:
Sigt - cGmt ereLs of unstable soils have been retained as a part of an internal
drainage and open space system. These will be partially developed concurrent
with housing develop:sent and deeded to The Preserve Homeowners Association.
Special P i et t i nn_P-e e l reme1nts:
1. A systc..l o i erar spaces have been delineated which interconnect the de-
velop,ne,: with existing and planted internal and external trailways, open
spaces, Id recreation end other community functions. These spaces will
also be '-ensferred to The Preserve Association concurrent with development.
2. Addition'i space has been provided for future R.O.W. development of
Anderson !zees Parkway as per the recoomendation of City staff. These
spaces wi 1 ce dedicated to the City of Eden Prairie through the proposed
platting :ogrem.
3. Outlots C e D have been described but no development plan is advanced at
this tint cee to the uncertainty of possible future County Road 18 up-
gradine and t present lack of market demand for the site. Discussions have
63111
A Total Environment Community •-8920 Franlo Rd.,Lden Prairie,Minn. 55343—(6121 941-2001
P.U.D. DEVELOPMENT STAGE PROPOSAL Page 2
occurred between the developer and county design staff. These discussions
have precipitated the proposed outlot configurations which are advanced by
The Preserve as a reasonable Interim solution for the developer and the
County Highway Department.
Park Fees:
8+fots of the proposed Amsden Hills II plat are outside of the original P.U.D.
limits as cpproved by the council. Fees in the amount required will be paid
to the park fund. Sae preliminary plat lots 1 - 5, block 1, lot 1, block 2.
lots 1 & 2, block 3, and part of lot 1, block 4. All other proposed lots are
covered by park dedication policies previously approved as a part of The
Preserve P.U.D.
Covenants:
All lots will become a part of The Preserve H.O.A. and be subject to the By-Laws,
Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions of The Preserve Association.
Market Level:
ATTofis within these preliminary plats are proposed to tell at the market
values of the imediately adjacent 1st phase single family plat which bears
the nnme of the platting area.
Tra.nspport.atin Sest rs:
All prow-Lee pints propose a continuation of previous approved local roadway
networks which extend from a neighborhood collector or local arterial network
as per previous P.U.D. commitments.
Zoning Variance:
the plat could utilize the modified setback standards applicable to other pro-
jects in Tha Preserve
5' garage to side lot 20' rear of house'to rear lot line •
10' 1-1.5 story house to side lot line 20' side yard setback for houses
15' 2 story house to side lot line built on corner lots, but not
30' front of building to front lot line conflicting with 30' setbacks on
adjacent lots.
50' minimum from any building line on
MSA County and State highways.
(fireplaces and overhangs shall not be considered as setback encroachments)
(accessory structures shall not be placed in the front yard and shall be 5'
minimtan from side and rear lot lines).
Site Conditions:
Both Area 5 plats will involee careful placement of housing units and roadways
to conserve natural vegetation of the site. Major ponding features will be re-
tained and incorporated into the storm ponding plan of the area.
The High Point IV platting area overlooks a meadow adjacent to Olympic Hills
golf course and the Veill Lake bottom from an adjacent wooded slope. Major
portions of the existing landscape will be retained through the development •
phase.
016
P.U.D. DEVELOPrrUT STAGE PROPOSAL Page 3
Conclusion:
ATt1 ough the platting areas proposed do constitute a reduction in the original
P.U.D. densities the development pattern and quality is consistent with over-
all P.U.D. objectives.
•
if
.
1
' . . ,,.
' / I .
\\
r
1 x
,1\\' '' ..' • •. • • :':1'i,i1,77,i
itti pa;i1c/ ,. l'i .,‘,.1....;....-:,,,. „..•,,..;,,,,,,„ -1
‘,..,g
• I'e,,, d....?,..-0.47' . I:.:.••• • '''...a.,...'..: •:.•...,1170
ci-
1.-4,..-ti,'•• ,- , , ?• ilsol-J,.,..: -..':',:,:•:.,.::"...,,
..
r
. .%"...,....... ,1 ,.. 0 . . 1 ' 1,40`!'° it,' " '".:.'f.i.'•'• ei
1 R..*?•::.,•:•' ,...6. ,:...11.f,pt!..,.,- .., , 1 ,; ri?:••••,. •
-.• '.-..',..i
:-..,... .•.-....,::::.:.:.... /::::,...:,..,:.,;.f..,:..:.. i,, F eri (-!;..,..."..t iri:.''''- .......::; .. ,',,:'.f.
'''.1'.. :'..,:::::!,:''''':: ,:'::::ZI:',::4::::::,:::.:. ',::.:' . if 1--u 1 i„;.-4i...5 , t: :: ....•;•...•;;;;;•:::,.....,„ :.6
, .!„,.. . . ..-... ,......,,...,:::...,,,„..,..,......‘.,,,......,...;.:;.:...:.::,... :• ... ''' ., fj, . • • .,;:•.;. P
p p A
p!rison) ,g
i'.0:,:',;::N.../l.:::,.',.....:...... ''''...: ':'.,''.. .:::'..,-';'.....•''''.'.:'::::.,,49, '4,3 7.,
Two
P I
CP, 1 •=:::::::,,.......-..:::4.;',f1.. ' . ....'''''''''. %it I% ) n ' "
- ,.....,:.•:::: ..;. ...'.. ?rfi..., 17 / • ; w,,,„dm so spa -, 'i
'/::::.:...:.•, ,.....: .;•..:::,://;:,,, i; - 4, 1 t • - 1 ''
'''''' ' • ,,- '•••/•:::•. .: ,f;::::-;;;I:%:•:•• )'.4, ci- I
.T. • i pApirt‘ ••••::,::::,;;.••••., • : ,:.7:. (...7...' ,.:::•:: 4,.. i •T- 1 •,--1— •
2,..i4f,,..,...:./..:...../.,.....,...:::::,,,;;::...........,::,.::/h:::::::::: ::•,..A ,01.,, I 1 )
te."'
. .11.4.:4:::,....,.,::;...::::,:.:.?..,:.:',V:::..../.::::)::..:•7::1!*•.,:'.4 1 ' 1 i 1
, .,:'44.:;•;•,,,;:::.::;:i.:,,:'/'.;:,,--:%:.:1...::.?..if.N'12'144 ,,, 12.A . : ' ; ''''N..s...„, , i
. '"iii!...:4:Yi.,:i'l.,'..;*/:;::;!.....64'.1...........ff.*::•:/;: ', .44\‘" a !, : ,. ,
it • / _,'
,,,
....,.z.4,..4:;../ ...,:„..,,,,,,::•,;:,,:.;.z:,,,fiff.' 3 •'.4.•,...:.,„:::;,,,: -.......:.•....:.y:.:2_ ,5 • ' ,,,,
___
: )
--, r- 1 LA. eiSr''•i•ti....! -, ,.
,,,J -0..----1 `)1_1" /____,/ ______I r--- ..:,-;:1- " • •- --..---.' — -— i
-11-ii L-§• ..:;... --------.--!------
, . ', : ' ‘.. • , i
."-....___
•••-
4,i Hustad
Development 0 i
•
"E - IT 1 • Co' // 73
CC
CU
///------ •
U-
, ..,r.... ,,0-- -kili--\
__ ,_,A r - • .:-', ,----- i r , \
\
I- - 116PW-
-i 1-
. :
i .-, re0 i
ji.le- ,41;serve
N,<
IL
L- r
NORTH•
•
May 1,1977
. . • pcol •- gl •o6ti. ,
Deco to thh
-� Pi•c serv9
j
��_ ��-r1 /_Y/\
\
Eden Prairie \.)
r
Center ;
,,/
rq • Anderson Lakes r---4.,
✓ /' The Pillsbury Company )• , 1
�e � --,fj11 '//
q N 'I t"[f k•'-c• ' i" it 2 1"�__., Anderson Lakes
Wildlife Park
Frank:,1Rani :-tits .t 1 • �„
,•, ;�• scnael�Park , �
} St• -nd ?( � a od
e..,.oea AM ImMla ..Ear-ilia-•••
\\•,....
i, • „church Prcpoe.d ✓BaakavbR
WmOUoP. • Sate Condo r '' 1
AP
* M' Sparlmahls "� ACaPe+W .�. i � 1 '
M++t'anca eassrso� X -M '
Anderson Lakes•
•
i 4•Li • -4 Ti v+ Oaks r ''
CC� ,Min; •.
�� Chi �`J .(l li
�"'" ` ' ";'..i'• Anderson Lakes
Neill Lake --s-)\ 41. Int • Wlldk(e Palk
l(_ ° 1
I \ Jh
C c, And«son
(://,—
J •.f >> Wkdlile Pr,
1 �'Ths Trails R
i Tewnhouaea
•
0
, r () ,` , ,a- ,, ,
/ \I„.-\, ! - 0,0,00-. •\.1 ,
f• 1 , ) _,
,(\ OynSOc Hills Goo Course ,,
c �•Ait•istf,h Hills
4 The Preserve EJ '77 Single Fam.Const. Projects
01t eveloprnent Status-May 11977
whp/jr
7/27/77 - Highpoint Third
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 351
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 135.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended
by adding to Section , Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
A tract of land lying and being in the County of
Hennepin, State of Minnesota described as follows,
to-wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
which al ^^-ty shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone
and shall be included hereafter in the RM 2.5 zone.
Section 2. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended
by adding to Section , Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
A tract of land lying and being in the County of
Hennepin, State of Minnesota described as follows,
to-wit:
See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone
and shall be included hereafter in the RM 6.5 zone.
Section 3. The above described property shall be sub-
ject
to the terms and conditions of that certain rezoning agree-
ment dated • , 1977, entered into between The
i/'T
r
1
• i
Preserve and the City of Eden Prairie, which agreement is hereby
made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all of the
ordinances, rules and regulations of the City relating to such
RM 2.5 and RM 6.5 zones.
Section 4. This ordinance becomes effective from
and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Eden Prairie this day of , 1977
and finally read, adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of said City on the day
of , 1977.
Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
Published in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1977.
-2-
•
Lot 1, Block 1, HIGH POINT THIRD Addition,
according to the recorded plat thereof on
file with the Registrar of Titles in and
for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
EXHIBIT "A"
6 3a I
Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 1, HIGH POINT
THIRD Addition, according to the recorded
plat thereof on file with the Registrar
of Titles in and for Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
EXHIBIT "B"
I
7/27%77
/c/fl 4‘xt 3'
tit
RR%ONTNC AGREEMENT
TIHIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into in triplicate
this day of , 1977, by and between THE
PRESERVE, a co-partnership consisting of Carter & Gertz, Incorporated,
a Minnesota corporation and The Minnesota Gas Company, a Delaware
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", and the CITY
OP EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal. corporation, hereinafter referred
to as "City",
WITNESSETJI:
WHEREAS, Owner has requested City to change zoning
from a 6.39 acres site from Rural to RM 2.5 and a 1.6, plus or
minus, acre site from Rural to PM 6.5 for the construction of
84 apartment units i.n which land is more fully described in
Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, it is believed that rezoning of said area to
RM 2.5 and RM 6.5 will be in the public's interest, welfare,
and convenience of the people of the City of Eden Prairie; and
WHEREAS, Owner agrees to develop the aforementioned
property in consideration of the City's changing of the zoning
and the Owner agrees that as a part of said consideration, it
will lay out, develop and maintain said project as hereinafter
set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETI, that for
and in consideration of the Mayor and the City Council of the City
•
•
adopting an Ordinance changing the zoning from Rural to RM 2.5
and RM 6.5, the Owner agrees to construct on said property
in accordance with the planning, architectual, engineering and
landscaping requirements of all city ordinances and will submit
development-stage rezoning plans to the City, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That the staff report dated October 19, 1976 is
incorporated herein and made a part hereof and specifically
the recommendations contained therein are adopted as the
recommendations of the council, namely:
a. That said site is appropriate for development
for 84 units;
b. That development shall be in accordance with
the Poolside Apartment Plan as depicted in the
September, 1976 brochure which is a brochure of
the owner Which is ma'e a part hereof an,: marked
Exhibit "B";
c. That the 1.6 plus or minus acres along the
Neill Lake Road shall be used for double
bungalow homes which meet the size and setback
requirements specified in Ordinance No. 135;
d. No more than four (4) double bungalows shall be
built (8 individual living units) .
e. That the division between the two areas shall be
as shown on Exhibit "A" herein;
•
f. That the Owner shall shield lights in the
parking lot in such a fashion that they shall
not interfere with the abutting property;
g. That the parking area shall be broken up by
the use of plantings;
h. That the southerly portion of the area abutting
the existing apartments shall he constructed to
create a division between the project involved
herein and the project lying to the south, said
berms are not to interfere with the existing
pathways;
-2-
r-"J;l(1
ei
i. Owner acknowledges that the access to the garage
may in the future be limited to right in -
right out turns from the east-west parking lot.
2. That all sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer
facilities, concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing
whether to be public or private, shall be designed to City Standards
by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer and submitted to
the City Engineer for approval. The developer, through his
engineer, shall provide for competent daily inspection of all
street and utility construction, both public and private. As-
built drawings with service and valve ties on reproducible
mylar and certificates of completion and compliance with specifi-
cations
shall also be delivered to the City Engineer. The
developer also agrees to pay all fees for City Engineering
and administrative services consistent with current City
requirements.
FURTHER CITY AND PROPERTY OWNERS AGREE:
1. That the property owners shall comply with all
applicable rules, regulations, ordinances and laws of the City
of Eden Prairie.
2. That the provisions of this Agreement shall be
binding upon and enforceable against owner, its successors and
assigns, and upon all subsequent owners, their respective heirs,
successors and assigns of the property herein described.
3. That an executed copy of this agreement shall be
recorded with the Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
-3-
4. That if Owner fails to proceed in accordance with
this Agreement within twenty-four (24)months from the date hereof,
Owner, for itself, its successors and assigns agrees that it
will not oppose the rezoning of said property back to its
• Rural zoning.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this agreement have
caused these presents to be executed the day and year aforesaid.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal
corporation of the State of Minnesota
By'
Wolfgang Penzel, Its Mayor
Roger Ulstad, Its Manager
THE PRESERVE, a co-partnership con-
sisting of CARTER & GERTZ, INCORPORATED,
a Minnesota corporation and THE
MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY, a Delaware
corporation.
CARTER & GERTZ, INCORPORATED, a
Minnesota corporation
By: Its:
•
Its:
THE MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY, a Delaware
corporation
By:
Its
Its
-4
•
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before
me this day of , 1977 by Wolfgang Penzel,
the Mayor and by Roger Ulstad, the City Manager of the City
of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation on behalf
of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , 1977 by
the and by the
of Carter & Gertz, Incorporated, a
Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
_._ Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , 1977 by
the _ and by _ the
of The Minnesota Gas Company, a
Delaware corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
•
-5-
•
A tract of land lying and being in the County of
Hennepin and State of Minnesota described as follows:
Lot 1, Block 1, HIGi1POI Nr, according to the recorded
plat thereof, except that part embraced within Tract G,
Registered Land Survey No. 1402, files of the Registrar
of Titles.
EXHIBIT "A"
634
' P
am}
`J J` V
04.1014. ,
^ bf . }
� i tJ : `+ L� � �
� „ v ..a v `
1�� t�. ao- t Y _
i ...1 it1 y:'!'" is !pl y . i i . 'f1 j,
f.yl� jc
i q 9'n,..i
i.. : . .iii.., ..k uS ...47.r•i...., tUtt a.f2...r..'r r .i. ies: r-d6..a.r-_x w., •••' .
..
POOLSIDE APARTMENTS
SCALE 1/16.1L d' DATE 9-76
i'�jc9) ELEVATION
•
._
...
. ,
:a d
� rr
rr
rr
r
rr
at
'Zt rr
t% u
e 11
i
NI
0 • , r------\\....._s„,.......li..".„- 4
`% I a4 "'t' I ij 7
i 3} i, t} ey7�'
f— 3{ :tc
, eden o1 ti 2d, a i as ...... w..
w
17 18 1V+.� 9 0 f
>7 1Y
r.N - t's\ tt q 13 .6'''c •d
J v 1 1 46 • ,
1 R4' Y 9f -'7 a
—. 4
�.. b e d7 c
a mad. a
ff �a' 1 t` a-1
.ff b'2 /
a/ �, , cAy:.1rR 1
^, a a
e 1 I.,, a
t5r -•
o v-d 0 b,,-�r L..J
1 1
al IMO al
rd
8920 Franlo fond
Eden 1-'2 ,Minnesota t 53as 3 PARCELIZATION PLAN
(G121947 20 01
THE PRESERVE - EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN.
DOUGLAS A. MOE, ARCHITECTS
We are pleased to submit for your consideration the following proposal for
84 units or rental housing. The project we propose is as follows:
1. Description of Structure
One 3 story apartment structure with a total of 84 units. The gross
' square footages are divided into 2 categories.
a. Dwelling space 73,706
b. Non dwelling space
Garage 31,356
Corridors, lounge, stairs 15,412
Total 46,768
Total Gross Square Footages 120,474
Total building coverage 11%
Number of units/acre 13.15
Total parking spaces - 21 unit 210
c. Surface coverage - 6.39 = 278,348 - 100%
Building coverage - 31,356 - 11.0% 1
Drives - 19,240 - 6.9%
Open Parking - 19,800 - 7.1%
Open Space - 207,952 - 75%
2. Unit Type & Size
Type Number Net Area/Unit Gross Area/Unit •
Studio 6 495 524
1 BR 30 703 727
' 2 BR 36 1,037 1,081
3 BR 12 1,162 1,224
•
3. Design & Materials
Each half of the building is serviced by the central core with its
elevator and amenity package including lounge, laundries, trash chute,
mail room, etc. Underground heated parking is provided with one space
for each unit and 1'2 additional spaces on grade. Storage lockers for
each unit are located throughout the building. The mechanical,
electrical and trash rooms are located in the basement.
The building is of 1 hour frame construction with a face brick exterior.
4. The Site
The 6.39 acre site is located on East-West Parkway just east of and
overlooking The Preserve Center Pool. Primary entry to the building
and associated parking is taken from the East-West Parkway. The building's
design is adapted to the site in a way that separate underground parking
facilities which are conveniently available to the future tenant. On
grade parking is set away from the building to create a buffer of green
adjacent to the building. The rear of the building orients to an
expansive private lawn terrace with overlooking views of the Preserve
Center Pool, tennis courts and other community amenities. Sufficient
space is planned in the proposed site plan for generous landscaped
screening, parking facilities and on site recreation spaces.
5. The Units
Each unit has its own private balcony or patio on grade. The 2 and 3
bedroom units have 1 3/4 baths and all units have kitchens spacious enough
for separate eating areas. The combined living/dining areas look out to
the view through an 8' wide sliding glass door to the private balcony.
All units meet F.H.A., State and local code requirements.
i be.473))
•
ff, r! 1! i•,/ ,/ \ ,r ,..
.,,,.-..--,:--- •-: -,int-
.\ N'' 1 . -7:7-7------w":.•:--- ' '' :i,''.. .:'
- /1-se----;-,----, ---":7— - r'' .,,'; "';::-..."!"<71-::.>
'1 ''' 7 . ,\ .. ....74,/,.7 .:.,7,.. : ., ...- .- , .
/, -.. , .. .. ,----\
-,v:.,,,:,-- ,i& .
1.1 ----- --;„ ./. , -,-,\ \\\\,,,, _. ..,, ,..• ii.(r' '-'4 ''''' ,>,`‘0"c"----,V.
• /CI 1-oc`,7---- \ ' • >, ,i.-_-'• ': ' 4, ,\ — , ---7,-
,...:..,:: . -:14:27 .11:-.....::'-'...' i:"''''''/' 1.- -.......''.1. ,;-..----..v1._--...„'s. ''''';''':'7\.•---:,',--:'.„..-1-:.......•,;'-:.,---.---,-----'=-,,'
. _ \ ., • ,, ,.A ,,,,,,,,,.\\,„.....-___-- . _ c.0-;,..r: '( ) •••,,1
,-----
• ...„(:"\-• -,..-.1„;-,z .,.,.--)... , •',„. c.\/ ' 'i'\,..^ -„, ,S44 , .,),:i\ 1
‘'„.11(c ..' '-' '1-2.''''-';'; ... V '' I 'rl \ t,'P, ;..• I
''S\ ''''' r' • ''"i) . --''';', ' '''.\,='-
\'• ,' -',', .c‘-.'; — '',?:':;\ r\ 7. 1> .,.--/ \,••-i
' ,‘- '•-C.":- . l'-'\-'---•-•':\---,•2 '.,....•\.", i' ,.: ,I, ',.'.../
:;,`*-,. \:".--'•`, ...--",''.1.'''.-,\ \ ••,' .'' ''',' . i, .,,,,,,\„-•••-•„,),....;/...." ••••;\_,, ,......-"\),,-,,‘,,,,,,,', , *,, 1 1. -'. ,
t i,• / .
•
.. t . 1E,, ,, ,\-Ccj''''`'-.' \,,"-fl.'•I, • tr -11 ,/17/ ')<,\40;:rgl")\
Milimiiia*"1 • It: , .-''''''----P4 jiri, :it,1
angfooms;i6.roocamop 0 8 Me:MUM*,.b att._ k•'74:44t:k4,:e.*- ,
/,,,' \'- '•\ ,r---i-----.-Lta* t*JP .4'2'..' '' ‘ i 1 '4 \ :
\ A,,'1:''',,,r/-".,'"\\ • -:-• 'S. es91 -Nk•••"*.. ' , \ 1 I
• _ _ , :
)1.1.,r.''.\'‘\\\\ , ;:( ' ‘‘,'•\, I, orae_.4.,%,_, , , ‘. • .A.
•\ ‘, .-. ) ., ., '4-4,'ip`\ , ) ' .
4."2- ,..-. ;\ \' ' •(•...T1°I .,.I. • ' \ \ s. ' 0,j, * '3,
1'4 ''1!S-s .‘•'\\ \ c"•.-'-7.1141, j•;•1{.... ,.\. .1% '' '., .
.. , .•
-•-•••\--- .;,.-,,, A., ••• • •• ,--.7 ',
'-•-•---1••-•‘-,-.•.--::" \\s,\\ \ 1#: ..1t..................
\••-'' :
'"POOL --:•• '. \ *dr at‘,' ...4.. : ........"
o,
\ - ''..t.‘i(74;'1:7;li:f;!1, 'i ?A
..sivi:illiEi:i01:•''''':n a
!•t' ..' r,-,1.---V''.«. , ' 'I \''‘ ,, .„2,,
„,:,,,,„,k,,,,, , ,\, .,..0 .......4 • .
.:-..!,,,, ), • :\ , 0.. •!':,,,,,,..oii,:iiiiiiT.:, -----
'\\\ . do k ,,••;ii.i..ki;-,l'ill"" "'•"' 41ifth..........
,4, f7
,4tir ,,....f., \
.::?4, " o, , i . \....---,
4'. . ........ . '
.`,. ;•.,,-•',.„:„ /,' ',.:,/.;1-'. -,,e•-:'•••.„,C,'• '-•• \''\ :`"1.V 4)- : ,
- -:,,i`... • --:‘-.24- 7-,,,-"\\,,\\\\\a, ' ''.':: '
i \
11.I
,...„ .. :
., _ ,:,-....,„,,... 14,X.----..„,1"..‘k.":2‘. ..\isX‘',.:. x • • - -- /
The PII-r...., serve
SCALE 1":200' BATE 1-75
,
89:1)trio Road -
rlit'll rl i1.110 MIII,,'til,i.1 Yi343 EXISTING CONDITIONS N ,
i
1 b /• 0
y
•
•
East West P
ark Liu
\To Garage Parkins 'f _-. r- `� , •Va pe •
\ This Wing p4nted y'-"" 7
. 'FA°Nth .: , .14 • '• ''':'''-
• i.\. i ' ', , • •\ ,. \ 4 \ , .....,.._
Plant •
H.O :` d, ...._\Berm .\
i�
1 L\u.P.d Court - • ,+Y ;
•
MI lel
ii Parking \ ,
•
Pool • 1� ` ` I , , '^"" /
it 1� '�t�� ti •� �1 ' .. J
' . ✓* /,
'. 0\A\ . , 'n• .:
•
To
oAdmin .�,`� /�/' ,.red OenattY ousing
To PreserveTo'r. A.,
Center i'�TA .,. In.r..nq \ / •/.
g I //
i , /
`� r'Sway ~ I
i 44111%101'.'
r ,�
/ ,
• Existing Ridgewoods Condominiums y
/ "NITA. % 4 (tr
1z
POOLS IDE APARTMENTS
SCALE I"=100' DATE 9•76
HIGHPOINT i 2 q
LOT 1 BLOCK 1 )'' SITE PLAN Q.
1
I, -
I 111:11 iii, , :
E ,
Bedroo I Living
1-7 '
D 01 ' Kit. Dining
il,....i
I-Br:144A .
ri ,...Lia?..jr
. Bedroom Bedroom Living
I 1
1
' D 1--\
r nu
1111 1
C3'' B Kit
im, lai •
°L,0 =47 . '9.,B ri Dining
One Bedroom Two Bedroom
727 sq.ft. 974 sq. ft.
,,", ,1-
_ 1....‘, ,, :
a '
Living Dining Living Bedroom Bedroom
1111Kit.a4
0.■....471 --
-_.L.,--1_7__V ' \'itval
1I0' -4 m}iii.,-• D
D Dining Kit. B —i Bedroom
1,
Studio Three Bedroom
524 sq.ft 1224 sq. ft
POOLS1DE APARTMENTS
SCALE 3/32"1=0" DATE 9-76
FLOOR PLAN 1
i')13 5 I
1
too
LOT 1 BLOCK 1 Highpoint
•
't EAST - WEST
4 R
gR�rygr
r
zeoo
74
. 'to Acres
`... e'kyer c 7 y♦
Zi
it
[ASCRIPTION OF CASEMENT ACROSS LOT 1
That part of Lot I, Block 1, High Point according tO the recorded plat thereof,
which lies southwesterly of a line described at follows:
Comment inq at the northwest corner of said lots thence North SO degrees
59 minutes II seconds Last, assumed basis for bearings, along the
northerly line of said lot, 68.69 feet: thence 15.00 feet along a
tangential turve, concave to the south. radius 904.93 feet. central
angle d degrees 57 minutes, to the point of beginning of the line to
be described., thence South 3 degrees 04 minutes Cast 64.42 feet:
thence South 22 degrees 26 minutes 16 seconds Last 466.34 feet.
thence South 64 degrees 34 minutes 40 seconds Fast, to the easterly
line of said lot, and there terminating.
1,Th 2 reserve SCALE 1":200' DATE 545
.8920['radio Road
Eden
' '' PLAT MAP f raves[', b5 Mmnotit+ter :3,33 1 j')l
f6f2941-2001
rov d
Planning Commission Minutes -6- llna mugust B, 1977
D. Poolside Apartments, by The Preserve, review of site and landscaping
plans.
Don Hess, The Preserve, stated they have reviewed the staff report and concur
with the recommendations of the report.
Retterath questioned the reasoning behind the "modern"light fixtures, as they
are not similar to other light fixtures within The Preserve. Mr. Hess replied
the fixtures proposed give "down lighting" as requested by some residents.
Retterath suggested The Preserve investigate other fixtures that might give "down
light" but be more compatible with existing fixtures. Hess stated he would
investigate alternatives.
Motion •
Lynch moved, Rcdpath seconded, to approve the Poolside Apartment site and lighting
and landscaping plans as per the staff report dated August 4, 1977. Motion carried
unanimously.
•
l`-
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
• THRU: Richard Putnam
FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant
DATE: August 4, 1977
PROJECT: Poolsidc Apartments •
•
Staff review of the site and grading plan for the Poolside Apartment project
raised the following concerns:
a. The large open area on the southeastern corner should provide screening for
the single family homes to the east in the same way the parking lot has a
berm on the east side. This could be a continuous berm along the entire east
side. Additional grading material for the berm could be obtained from grading
the open area flat or more gently sloping away from the building. (See Fig. 1)
b. The parking lot has a setback of 25' as shown presently on the site plan. This •
setback is required to be 50' . (See Fig. 2) •
•
c. Additional "islands'for tree plantings should be incorporated into the parking
lot layout to break up the continuous horizonal feeling and provide some
coolness to an otherwise heat absorbing surface. (See Fig. 2)
d. Thv, lnretion of the totlot should be moved farther away from the building
to prevent eventual tenant conflict. Perhaps moving it to a flat spot provided
by the grading of the large open space. (See Fig. 3)
e. Retaining walls will be used along the sides of the below grade driveways
to the underground parking. A dangerous situation is created here by having
a vertical embankment exaggerated by the fact it is next to pedestrian trails
in both instances. A detail should be drawn up showing a barrier of height
consistent with safety standards along these depressed driveway areas. (See
Fig. 4)
f. The V-shaped area created by the two buildings on the west side could be made
more useable perhpas if the area was graded at a gradual slope to the west
along with the construction of a retaining wall along the road. This relatively
•
flat area could become a more useable space for group activities, etc. The
retaining wall could carry the same design motif as the adjacent Preserve Center
thus relating and tying the two together.
g. The landscaping along the north side of the parking lot as shown on the plan
does not provide adequate screening from the Fast/West Parkway. Additional
berming and/or heavier plantings would satisfy this.
h. The Preserve Center east entrance and Poolside Apartments underground parking
will share the same access to and from East/West Perkwey. The information
or directional signage should be clear and concise and accurately depict the
use and entrance/exit of each drive. (See Fig. 2). Poolside Apartments cast
entrance, which also serves the parking lot, should have clear signage on one
side or the other indicating the drives particular use. (Also, see Fig. 5)
j2 1)
•
•
•
. Poolside Apartments —2— Aug. 4/77
i. The information on the light standards is included in the packets. The
information indicates mounting heights of no less than 20'. The staff feels
that the light standards should be a maximum of 20' in height and directional
beams to eliminate as much horizonal-lighting as viewed from outside the parking
area as possible.
J. Final drainage plan should incorporate surface water drainage and storm sewer
details so as not to overburden existing drainage systems.
k. The internal pathway system, where it crosses proposed road, should be more
clearly defined to provide safe crossing and connection points.
DP:md
•
•
•
• it
r,1", \,\\\_‘\.,__.;‘, ,i,,t-.:.,..,,,,',,,, ,,.,,z,t?;,,>' '., ' ;', .. ./(2. 7,c'lit::_:•''',''':‘,1%\:‘‘\:‘\:\:-:;:<::::::1'21.;:";f ,'.- s,:1\--41.\.1 :\N\ '
\ 1 . z. /
/ � �j1D11� t j.
fkAnt
a
i / i.
, ,,,,ic
'' .'{ i Y{ i ''•i.'✓'\. Lm :`. ` �J /' )••
f /
//y�p`J / / %----rST 4t r \ �\ \. •
x-s�\, '/ wn\r{ r,..\\ -x ' {t -
•
"•r' ' r ._
7--',.=)1 :,,. \.',./.1-‘-5 \ t l _
I \. ! ~',`'/AN `• ,./.!`_1i Ir)(�� G'J6',. 1 i .e' , --P✓5 L '-' r,
t\ `_•` \/ \ GoN,T rit z� 'C'T.s s �i 1 ; / ' i
it
'A/ 1
CO
2-Jo \\ \�. i [F19:1) 11'
',,, �\fir �,'•� yj,-; -" ..1
.;:
,
•
•
\ ' r
) -- --^,_.-. --- _"! - '. , -r , 1 /
f ,�" ,, r
\ik....
V.,,, ,....,,,,,
^ 4.` , ' { \ i ,,, I 1 .1 nTif: 1 \i ; . ��%�7 '/ f.,T-
.q // \ .,:' %\ //!JY y / ' 7 f'".','''-',..la'"'.-..; \,�\�� '' J Y-j. /ri'
‘-\-\''\''''' 114/I '7,''',.' ...C...: ' .. ' '' ' ' ,‘ ''' . s'. ' VI>
\ 1
I \\
", 1� ,• c \{/ _.,t.- ,,� tih4 �.
1.
1 L.� \r\ `'ors l� \\ \
i 1 y 17 / 1 _- - tY h ,:-� .
11 ,1\ I(s` /
_ f Yl �I I. !. i j f ...\
1 , } �, \
1-';
r,, i 1 r, «,, y,.' tea_ 4-•-Y,
::::,../.---___.:11,';'/!Ts-,2:,\.:::
1,1:'"---.4,...,7.1-1.\:),,\\\\:\\\'.:1(1.1\.'• • !A-:"\t'.'
.r l too___/� �' ;y.• " ~1
, •. - .„ r -- --- -:.---'\ '1---''',-.'',t— . ..,. ti"..:- ,:','"st.kzii' • , \./. .'4,' :•,‘ ; ir,
N -•., A ', . ':,1:::..- .:•..•-•-:;..• \ \v.• : , _.;,-,r, , ;;;;"--%!', ‘ . ' r 0 c_c,.. ' ''.'
.., .... \. _,A',J. i 1.; .- .-'..!.'
• '-J '` 1. �R - � ;.�' ' �_ .,
1/1 Y :a ` r ,• •. •. /t2. -
1 I �� ` •
_'_..,, '/ _r tot ` 1 f. .. /:4' l \
7
�-- ` '> / • y; ,
__A I '\ %\ >' ,/ ,.'' ,\,, ��lri,��, �,�j1 f;x ,
,•,..?1 :,•:-.• .., -7.....-.,\\/,•;:.,/;',/ \ V___\,. q \\ , .,‘ 7. ,
-, .i \ \ \ .` \\// , \ \• i l .
f /
\\ •\I mil` �`�.[ \- r
SUS t'j~ •—':•r<7`� \\
, __, . •
��- >u�
7,4\ .„,"1:,..,, .........- % r ..,..---j.4*---7:* 1_1,-y...7 174:f 1 --- __:77-:,.....-1-,,,ry-• 4
:._ . _ .,.. \ 1\ ';',It'',\,.q.ie • , 47/„..7,,,---:—,
-\\ -\. , :k- ',),-'\ 1 . - ..-• ..-'•- '" - — ' '!
7 j', �i / ' a I.� if ,
U (r/'/ l ' Nor';"N �'ir�L� c.
•
V
.r
, rI \ 1 ,
{ 7-r 1 t ,.. y.
h•.- It'>.is,. FArlier* ,•,�• ! 11 .! J •1t`!t"'.r{ y''/,I i
2..,:.''-l-c-,1••t;' ), .i / , ,I • •
-- - vo , ' ,.t__--,- 7 , . ./. • i I 1
:.___ WI i-N 1 - — , v,--,.. isf\r-, '• ‘ <,,,;),,v,-,,,i \ ,,ra,'. '
6 ; \TJ .� i 1 r -•';r/�-:..V Ijt
• r•!-,1q.-.1 11-1(..." 1 .'-„--7--,- —7 .>..--...,-,•; ,,,i,1_.1 \), \
-42 1'G r DAi ;""-- nJ
en r y
Council Minutes Nov. 23, ]976
•
•
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS •
B. Poo15ide Apartments, The Preserve, 84 unit apartment and double bungalow
lots located south of Anderson Lakes Parkway and northwest of Neill Lake
Road in The Preserve, request for PUD Development Stage, rezoning to RM 2.5 .
and RN 6.5 and preliminary plat approval.
City Manager Ulstad explained that an affidavit is on file calling for this
Public Hca,ing and that the Planning Commission has heard the presentation.
Don Hess, The Preserve, and Doug Moe, architect, spoke to the proposal
and outlined same with graphic illustrations and a site model. Following
their presentation, Mr. Hess and Mr. Moe answered questions of Council
members.
Planning Director Putnam outlined the proposal the Planning Commission
considered and specifically spoke to the Commission's recommendations made
at their meeting held October 25, 1976, and to the Staff Report dated
October 19, 1976. •
Larry Peterson, The Preserve, explained that the renter would receive one
underground parking space in the rate of the rent.
minutes - 3 - Tues.,November 23, 1976
•
1 r
B. Poolside Apartments, The Preserve (continued)
Meyetrs noted that the Engineer's report and Staff report indicates The Preserve
has not presented a landscaping plan. Mr. Moe explained that the landscaping
budget will be in the vicinity of $20,000.00.
Penzel questioned the distance between the proposed apartment units and
Highpoint lot lines. Mr. Hess replied approximately 450 feet.
Penzcl questioned if The Preserve could see an opportunity for taking over the double
• bungalow portion of the site. Mr. Peterson replied that they have not considered this
as The Preserve feels this type of development of double bungalow lots would
be very salable.
Meyers asked if, because of the visibility of the parking lot, The Preserve
• would consider planting a few trees in the parking lot itself to break up the
monotony. Mr. Moe replied they would certainly consider it, but as of right
now they have not really faced up to that particular question. Putnam added
that when the Planning Commission reviewed the modified plan the Commission
had in mind that there would be plantings similar to Homart's where trees
were brought into the parking lot.
Meyers explained that because of the heighth of the parking lot that internal
lighting fixtures in the parking lot should have some restrictions on heighth and
intensity so adjacent property owners are not looking at lighting fixtures and expos,
to illumination in their homes. Mr. Hess explained that shields can be provided.
Jim I•jnrs, 10700 Lake Fall Drive, stated that as the project moves ar:av from
the residential area he becomes less hesitate about the project. He is concerned
about the size as it is twice the size of the Ridgewood Condominiums. Also
questioned if there would be an assurance of a buffering zone.
•John Crouch, legal counsel for Tom Bach who resides at 9051 Neill Lake Road,
spoke to his communication directed to the Council dated November 20, 1976. •
(Communication attached as part of minutes).
John Retterath, 9011 Highpoint Circle, questioned the price range from the
original concept.
• Toni Bach, 9051 Neill Lake Road, stated that if this project is built it will
have a substantial impact on the single family detached residential area,
and requested that The Preserve build transitional type housing.
Meyers questioned the management guidelines. Mr. Hess replied that Landtech
is going to try and run a tight ship, but as yet Landtech has made no definite
conniitment.
MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Meyers, to close the Public Hearing and
adopt Resolution No. 1211, approving the preliminary plat of Poolside Apartments.
Further to adopt recommendations cited by the Planning Commission in their
minutes dated October 25,and that 4 double bungalow lots totalling a maximum
of II units he approved on the 1.6+ acre site along Neill Lake Road subject to
size and setback requirements as specified in Zoning Ordinance No. 135. Also .
add the requirement that shielding of lights in the parking lot be provided as
visual screening for adjacent property owners, and that plantings of trees be
integrated in the parking lot and butter treatment between the double bungalow
lots and the apartment site be required. Motion carried unanimously.
1
•
( ( d
•
•
- 4 - Tues.,Novembcr 23, 1976
•
B. Poolside Apartments, The Preserve (continued)
•
Although Pauly voted in favor of the aforementioned motion, she expressed
reservations about the project mainly due to the size. However, she felt
caught in a corner as the City had made a previous commitment.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to approve the 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 351, rezoning the 6.39 acre site to RM 2.5, and 1.6+acre site
to RN 6.5 for the construction of 84 apartment units and the maximum of 8 double
bungalow units. Further direct. the City Attorney to draft a rezoning
agreement before the 2nd reading, including recommendations of the Staff and
Planning Commission, with the stipulation that access to the underground parking
garage from the Anderson Lakes Parkway may be restricted in the future to right in -
right out; and the Planning Commission review a completed landscaping plan and
completed internal site plan before the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 351.
Motion carried unanimously.
•
r� ) i(
• '
whp/Jh 4/22/77
Norseman lud. Park Second Addn.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO, 77-19
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 135.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to
Section 12, Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
That part of the East 30 acres of the South 1/2 of the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 12, T. 116, R. 22, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying South of County Rd. No. 39,
Except the East 433 feet thereof,
which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural and shall be
included hereafter in the 1-2 Park zone.
Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the
terms and conditions of that certain Rezoning Agreement dated
1977 entered into between HERLEIV HELLE and BORGHILD HELLE and the CITY
or EDEN PRAIRIE, which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further
be subject to all the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City relating
to such I-2 Park zone.
Section 3. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage
and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie on the day of , 1977 and finally read and
adopted, and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of
said City on the day of , 1977,
Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Published in the Eden Prairie news on the day of , 1977.
' I
_2_
• .approved
Planning Commission Meeting -6- Feb. 28, 1977
F. Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition, by Helle, request to preliminary plat
and rezone 16 acres from Rural to Industrial I-2 Park. The site is located
south of Co. Rd. 39 approximately 400 feet west of Washington Avenue. A continued
public hearing.
. The planner referred the commission to the staff report recommending denial of the
project and the BRW letter addressing the traffic concerns. He stated the city staff
believes a north/south route is needed and the property owners should work in conjunc-
tion with the staff in order to allow reasonable industrial development in this area
of the city. He further stated the staff is suggesting Mr. Helle resubmit his plat
and show a north/south road.
Mr. Helle did not believe a north/south road is needed to serve the property and did
not desire dedicating any right-of-way as the right-of-way should be purchased. He
added that the Valley View Road relocation is a county matter and the city need not
become involved and deny his project on that basis. He believed the city is not giving
him equal treatment
Tom Bartel asked if the property to the east of this proposal is zoned. The planner
I
• replied the property is zoned and built upon.
Motion 1: -
Lynch moved, Suudstrcm seconded, to close the public hearing considering the preliminaa
plat of Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 2:
Lynch moved, Sundstrom seconded,to recommend the rezoning and preliminary plat request
by Mr. Hello , dated Jan. 7, 1977 be denied based upon its inconsistencies with the
transportation needs of the Lake Smetana Plan and the Feb. 23, 1977 BRW letter repo-
Motion carried 3:0:1 with Bearman abstaining.
•
•
•
•
•
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -6- . Feb, 14, 1977 •
•
E. Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition, by Mr. Helle, request to preliminary
plat and rezone 16 acres from Rural to Industrial. The site is located
south of Co. Rd. 39 approximately 400 feet east of Washington Avenue. A continued
public hearing.
Mr. Enger referred the commission to Mr. Helle's letter of Feb. 14, 1977 and the
BRW report dated Feb. 10, 1977.
Sidmond Belle, representing Mr. Herleiv Helle, stated the property is shown to be
industrial by all studies done by the city and they wish to receive zoning as soon
as possible so they can market the property which is presently at a -very high tax
level even though it is only zoned Rural.
•
Pauly asked if the staff had concerns relative to the zoning or if their concerns
are about the road location. Mr. Enger replied the staff agrees with the zoning
• request but does have concerns relative to road location and right-of-way.
Sorensen asked if the staff report would be completed by the next meeting. Mr. Enger
replied he believed the report could be completed by the next meeting depending upon
staff time.
Sidmond Helle believed a logistical problem is involved in placing the road as depicted
in the BRW report.
•
Mr. Sorensen suggested Mr. Helle submit any further information to the staff in time
;o that. it could be addressed in the staff report.
Motion:
Fosnocht moved, Sundstrom seconded, to continue thepublic hearing to the commission's
Feb. 28th meeting. The motion carried unanimously.
•
•
•
ti I7S •
... ...w. + �.�,.. - .,. 'A; .. -
•
•
• approved
Planning F, Zoning Commission -6- Jan. 24; 1977
•
B. Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition, by Herleiv Helle, request to preliminary
plat and rezone 16 acres from Rural to Industrial. The site is located south of
Co. Rd. 39 approximately 400 feet east of Washington Avenue.
Mr. Helle stated his request is very simple, 4 acres per lot and sewer and water are
available and will be worked out with the City Engineer. He stated he has tried to
sell the property, but buyers want zoning. He felt the zoning will be consistent
with the Guide Plan and he will retain the tree line between the property and Hillger's
and Bearman's homes. He expressed his opposition to Co. Rd. 39 going through his
property and objected to the road system proposed by the Smetana Lake Report.
Bearman questioned which way Co. Rd. 39 would be relocated. The planner replied the
county will be addressing the issue and the city may be seeking traffic consultants'
assistance in reevaluating the road system in this area of the Smetana Lake Sector.
The planner stated one problem with widening Valley View is that as it crosses the
creek it is limited to the existing right-of-way and no additional right-of-way can 1
be acquired because of park dedication along Nine Mile Creek.
Mr. Bill Pearson stated he has no objection with the road systems.
Helle did not believe further time and study should be spent on road systems in
Smetana Lake as the city has already done one report.
Motion:
Lynch moved, Fosnocht seconded, to continue the public hearing to the commission's
Feb. 14th meeting and direct the staff to prepare a report and recommendations.
Helle objected to any delays and requested the commission take action tonight or
he would proceed to the City Council. •
Sorensen asked Mr.Helle to allow the commission to consider the motion and ruled
Mr. Helle out of order.
Mr. & Mrs. Helle further objected to continuing stating it was a delay that was
uncalled for.
Sorensen informed the Heller they were out of order.
Mr. Putnam reminded Mr. Helle, according to Ord. 135, the commission has 60 days
from the date of referral to make a recommendation on an item before it goes to
the City Council.
Vote: The motion carried 4:0:1 with Bearman abstaining
Mr. Helle again expressed his displeasure of having the item not acted upon and
stated no further study should be done on the road systems. He said he would
ask to he on the Council's agenda with or without a Planning 6 Zoning Commission
recommendation.
•
}
STAFF REPORT
TO : Planning Commission
FROM: Dick Putnam, Planning Director
DATE: Feb. 23, 1977 •
PROJECT: Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition
APPLICANT: Mr. Hello •
REQUEST: Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 Park
LOCATION: South of Co. Rd. 39 and west of Norsem , Ind. Pk 1st Add.
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
a. Smetana Lake Sector Plan , June 20, 1974
b. Eden Prairie Council Resolution #900
c. Feb. 10, 1977 Memo from Richard Wolsfeld, BRW
d. Feb. 14, 1977 letter to Roger Ulstad, City Manager from Mr. Helle
INTRODUCTION •
The reference deeuments listed illustrate the comprehensive research and analysis
that has been utilized in drafting the conclusions and recommendations which fol-
low in this report. The staff will not restate the facts and conclusions , hut
rather confine our discussion to controversial issues.
LAND USE
•
The landowner's request for T-2 Park zoning is consistent with the city Guide Plan
originally adopted in 196S and amended in 1974 with the Snetana Lake Plan.
•
TRANSPORTATION SYSTLDS
The landowner rezoning request does not allow for the construction of a north/south
relocated Valley View Road connecting the Co. Rd. 18 interchange with the MCA
Schooner Geulevard / 212/ 109 interchange.
The Smetana Lake Plan recognized the need for an arterial street as critical to
the orderly development of the industrial land south of Valley View Road, the sep-
aration of industrial and residential traffic and the need for a high volume arterial
connecting two of the three interchanges serving the 1,000 acre sector.
Mr. Noldsfeld's letter, 2/30/77, concludes: 1
" The conclusions of this analysis from a traffic engineering
viewpoint is to build a relocated Valley View Road as a four
lane arterial with turn lanes at major intersections. This
road should intersect at right angles with both the extended
Shady Oak and Ring Road. The specific location of Valley View
Road is beyond the scope of this effort." (refer to Fig. A L B)
, Staff Report- Norseman Ind Pk 2nd Add -2- Feb. 23, 1977
•
Figure A Figure B
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
sH1b A •
09 •
��
•
•
a.Ew
Rl J
RiNcr a�11 2 el
•
•
•
I-k94 •
Land Use 6 Transportation System Recommendations
The staff review of city policy , Mr. Helle's rezoning request and Mr. Woldsfeld's
analysis produces the following recommendations:
• i
1. That the relocated Valley View Road is necessary to allow
orderly development in the Smetana Lake Sector.
2. That the right-of-way for relocated Valley View will require
extension through Mr. Helle's 16± acre plat. •
3. That the use of Mr. Helle's 16t acre site for industrial park
(I-2 ) is consistent with all city plans.
•
•
[��rt
•
I
• s •Staff Report-Norseman Ind Pk 2nd Add -3- Feb. 23, 1977
. i
. ;
; . •
i..,,r„..... 7:7-71-77,.*-----'—VCII
• - .• TK:::...7:1
/".' ---- :7----- - -"..4.7.--.--::--.--4 1
21' ( ---NN i
)) i '''.\ ----------4'.'2.---- ilw .••
--.""------,: ----.., .'..---'"----------7
i•,.'"; I ( 1,..— ii, l„_,
t I
/
1 (1 :N.:A I jet. . • ot74)":1 ((',---,1)) (-- •,'" , '
\ if• A • „(<77' ( V.^2,i4,g47,,___:_...L—•••- )1)!.1 ./
/ / •
C\
)1, L-, »'• 1 _ _
„•-•-„, , ___ /.
• ...;.- - i .•,-/ ,i'; . . . , i „e,d,., ,1
•
. .,%• 7 71, ;in.
---?. ,,...--,- ;;, \--i. 7 •...--4--- .',.•__...,.—, ,, io
).'.., I d'L.----.••,.----- %.2! --I:7/ ii i ._._../.,,, / :I!, •
ICI / '''' ' • -12 ....---; ,,, / , I ,.e•-• ',,.
___---Ai, .2::.• f ---:.; .3--, it ,
_______—,. ; .
.--!:' 1 17---,r ‘ .;
--- — , 1, ,/. — Q- : 1, ' ' / (------91 c"--''--'.% 1
/.
..<---•-----1•-° ':'. I i V' ' ? 1- 1:
7 ----- v, nrn. i
----.;,-- -7-'); --1• / 7 .
.. - ;; ------------0 4' ,i ?,;,.'t
( / ,,';,::•; ..-"tit
.s .,K_,/,' /,/".•:-_,././ I -i 3 ,,:•: ....., ,,,..LLI
--,----•--•— , • -
. . . ,, .c :,:'''••••':•',/ i,- ".,/, ,
-----\ '';--2J'' ''.--;•:',,i- --- ---, '' E
. I-----",-;;"...:•• ,',.:, ;;\ I . . . u
i-` •
•-------.,i::-..;: !:' ,',;;:, ,).., „./ ; II\ f
7 • (5
I. :-..-. .;.•_-:-:--..-••• --- -:"': ...1 il
. .• .. ••• , II z •
• /.y,-,;,,•;•-2,4'; , :.„,
., 1 .,, 4
,..,,,i/74/ ',/ ('‘' F.:7.-7. - .: - !.1 i;Li .,.- 6,.; ' •
/ 1 _..„.,_. , ,. .78/(/,';-.--:- ,. : g
,----- ' -------, '-'.___ -..,-.,. -------; . ....,.1 i '•I , s : - • ._.: : F., .
/it// ti 1
•— — -------221 j '`..—--"-••••,--71%--;---:- --';' • •' / :-;".:'.'.•:••••,-‘i 7: ,
I I i — i 1 I i *
... I
I tlattif i MID.
•-_
Figure 1 is the plan proposed by Mr. Helle with no road alignment provided. •
Figures II, Ill, IV illustrate minimum 2± acre industrial lots with three road
alignments. The staff recommends that figures II, III, or IV be considered
by the property owner in a redesign of his site plan.
(Figures III & IV on following page )
' .
yid
' ' • .
. t
Staff Report-Norseman Ind Pk 2nd Add -4- Feb. 23, 1977
•
.t.,,L.I.•Int .
fikl•Villn- .4..\:'• . '• .5/7Y flag.-.15 • • 1 .
, r
vr...____
i • .11/tvgli4
1
'::::-.-.".7..7._.... ......:,:-1:.17._ -___!.. '°.a ',.,.'- ' 1 ._.il.
,l.
• I-
..--7.7.;;
R' / N .
\ \ , I . 7fI•7.; ...'.;i.r o ii
;111
i
\'•\\) _ )\I •
, •'. \ \' \ II%4 ..,,,,,,,„_;.. ,! -
i ..
)
,„) .,, „,:::, , ,4.• . , .
' `-„;..-/A',17 P-T4,, .,2) / .:;;:, ...,.,..• .....,..t 1-...? til-ti..1/.2)7 7-7.4.,i:!! ...:, ,
..:; . /7) '1 1 I..6 .7 _ r:., ,• ,_. , 9 - _:•:,, ,
,i - ',.//,,I..• ,;7;•:-----.2 •-•' /4,-; '
rgz; . -.. v•/ •'•'; -• i,
• .i....
-•if• . 1 ; i , -...-- _,,,,,...,...___;,..,..; - i-- . •.; .1
.,....., .„._-....:;:, f
i. ------' -:, r.„.„i„ ; 1 ;
:,....=t..-1.----7- _..„.... * Ii 0.:.„,...7 -. ....._,..4. .;
i , , ,.. ---4 :.:. ,; .1 e
•Vo'lly ._
•:-:- ...:: ) /.-;,,
( t*----7// :i '/•:/. . '. '. " 7777.• .'" '. . I ' •
. ...:.--,, , .;—71 / " '" ..--•'•
——, ;''':9 ./._.'" )•I *" * 1 ,74 '--..----r, .F,,,,_____,
---:-.: ..-- • ---,
• - ._ ..„. r,.. . .•,_ _-_-,.,..-.:
...-..-•:-.7.::-...p.i..:::::::-.1 ',., -Y::',I..1.",•--...--.-.-.—:—.. ir.;.- ---7-‘••....--4.,.' , 5, , I . , , , '
es:•••.....-7,1,; ,,,,, ; II, .1 1:
•.7//'.!..:c."•'.:'1 • " 1I l'i z
1,1///1 VI,(,;''.I " •• :'--.1 1, I •I ...' 7:
,•••-•'•A,;iiiI I I - •, -:.- /.1 ,,........ . .• .•-,i -;
•'''1:1-•-;!..L --' / '--"-•: -'2-t•:: f•zt.. --, '..; --..2.. :•-:-.-.... ••: 0..7 ----I. ;.•'-'3-2--...•.',..,.:......;" ..L.:,
I J •I 7----..._._. .....,,,,
'7:i •
. , I
9
••
rt-A2 I .
' . 14414-0.:4-$ • . • i .
. --- ---------------- • -------- ,
_ -
Construction of relocated Valley View Road would be to a normal industrial street .
standard as requested by the property owner. Future street expansion to county
arterial standards would be accomplished by the County or City when the need warrants.
Right-of-way for relocated Valley View Road should be provided by property owners
as the property is zoned and platted for development consistent with the provisions
of Ordinance 93.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The staff recommends that the rezoning and preliminary plat request
.
by Mr. Helle, dated Jan. 7, 1977, he denied based.upon its inconsis-
tencies with the transportation needs of the Lake Smetana Plan .
2. The staff recommends that the proponent redesign his plan to provide
right-of-way for a relocated Valley View Road through the lo* acre site.
•
- • •
DPW
. ,
. .;
- i
/00 •
i
1
• .
n 'I; 1ERI,RIV Il•
ELLG
u4/� /�7 6138 Arctic Way
/1f Edina.Ptiruresota 55436
•
/ February 14, 1977
1, Mr. Roger Ulstad
Manager of
The City of Eden Prairie
.Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
' Dear Mr. Ulstad: .
•
I am sorry that the planner did not show up at the Planning Commission meet-
ing of January 24th. Without notifying me, he had left for an out-of-teen
trip, and his replacement did not show up. He probably would have done a
better introduction than I did.
I have to admit that 1 was very disappointed because my proposal did not pass.
It was sent back to the staff for more study. Then a question came to my mind.
Is this like another Lake Smetana study for over a year ... or is it just two
weeks. I am writing this letter in order to clarify my view, and hope it helps
the City to understand my problem.
1. The Parcel in question lays wrest of Norseman Industrial Park, which
lies in thho Southwest corner of County load r.9 and Washington Avenue.
The Parcel number is b2005, and the size is 16+ acres.
2. The propose zoning is from Rural to I-2 Park. This zoning was recom-
mended in your 19G8 guide plan, and the i•taculen report of September 4,
1973, and the staff report of October 29, 1973, and the final staff re-
port of June 20, 1974, which was approved by the City Council.
The parcel is located roughly 800 feet from a diamund interchange. On your
staff report of October 29, 1973 recommends: "Industrial development should be
considered within the major highway access area". As you can see, all planners
and all plans agree that this particular parcel should be an I-2 Park. There
is also demand fur industrial land in,the area.
I could have sold 1/2 of this parcel to a printing company last spring if it had
•
been zoned. This spring I have another prospect inquiring seriously about 1/2
of this parcel.
The rental in the area seems to be good too. J. T. Mork Co. started construction
on an adjacent site August 17, 1976. in these five months, they have built two
buildings and rented over 50;:, of the area. This is an excellent result when you
consider today's economic condition.
I have to have 74th Street built in order to get service to the south half of
said parcel. As you prooabiy know, when I plotted horseman Industrial Park, I
was requested to dedicate 40 feet for future 74th Strout. Mr. George Night.
who was your planner or manager at that time, said the other 1/2 would be re-
quested from the neic;hbor, When they came in for plotting or request for build-
ing permit. However, the City did not live up to its promise when the neighbor
. , 14-n i.
• •
City of Eden prairie
;Y2 • .
•
February 14,
on the south of my property built, and to avoid any consultations,
I declare
me willing to give another 26 feet of land in order to construct 74th Street.
assessment
will also assume the cost, preferably by of land, as long is the .
neighbor can prove they don't need the street.
Water is available on Washington Avenue. •
Utili� A? parcel at a
Is available on the Northwest corner of my 2 acreley c+ Road. It is
Sewerown
extended• x closest outsideut to of the rod, and itisd llocated within myt own
re . hi of she c"ly bedextended through myetgravel
pitt
be-
border. Tva onn asspr
eduse excavation has proceeded so far that we g
gravity flow through there.
The present zoning on the north and south is Industrial. On the west side are
order line
heavy belt of forest, rather big trees and substantially
two homes which altogether have an area of 7 acres. The
hthbough, except in the properties has a he Y
couplemuciLu
which makes itf foliage
hard to penetrate
can barely see through it. This
s and in to that,
cakes of xcelle• When etre between
is up, youo addition ofo the
Makes myn excellent harrier it w be those twozonings, get a berme with heaYY
- when area is graded, will be at a lower level than the property
neighbor's hone`• Therefore, automatically we will her 2 he that with
he be-
Man could not make a better
orbarrier
r rie here than Mother Nature
• va prlvid on top. side
haso toprovided. I am guessing, bute thinkintention 1
of is l my property, and I have no hsm obcteI re eve and mind
nown do outside is
of the line• I canr�at guarantee `t this time, but I have in mind to erect a
pairhof c buildings like thosek og lot,T. Mork Co., asead cry iT theb tsidel
the office building and Parking and all the loading
ally between the too buildings. This makes truck traffic almost invisible from
• the street aiid adjacent property.
Anybody interested can drive over there in the neighborhood and look at it them-
selves. I want to go on record as
View Road, You can find
When itd eves to the so-calledee nw Valley 1g74 Thereare
opposed to it• It is the same view that I had a few years ago.
1,
and I will try to explain a few of them.
out by reading my report to the Planning Commission of May 2
a number of reasons, ro arty, you
y and Bearman-Hi119ersp will then You
If this road is located 1/2 and 1/2on n+
The neighbor
there is an elevation variation of 3B feet, in ateep
will have to cut down roughly speaking, 100 t�"eeS'
theirirprivacy. furthermore,than
in the ley'
a tremendous cut with high retaining wall,or haveit wide slopes,
distance of not freers than 400 feet. You either will have to build a very
road, build
hh of pae will lower
Which it
requiret a tremendous riree owao• and
project
to wat
y sewer. It is a tremendously
area, it will interfere with the free flow ossurface 11eycVic,wacRoad because of
it hard to construct Interv.cction with thepresent
build a ocuq�cr.++) it well not t a curve
a combination of elevation ul+Lyi f easels and(ohotyzjpot as as verticalcurve.
Furth�r'•,,1e, to build person .. nor can it be built piece-meal either. •
• 9
• City of Eden Prairie 1
February 14, 1977 - Page 03
/• Inc. 1
Inl
the EdenPrareceived�IndustrialaRevenuet the hBondainEthetamountlofu$940,000
had now reusly , had received additionally $1,300,000 in Industrial Revenue
Bon now rguessly,
Bond. I guess you do this in order to create jobs
sthirtigsn Eden
However,rIe'bYand
I assume
thiso+sicran industrialcorrect Park,and+ith doing of he help of the builders, also
developing
as
have created 100 jobs, and maybe more, and none of us so far as I know,
asked for any Industrial Municipal Industrial Bonds. to Eden
All I am asking for is rezoning, so I can continue to bring jobs
• Prairie without any municipal support. However, if some land owners
south
of County Road ir39 and east of Nine-Mile-Creek timer any
wrs rezoning,
lwa
seems to wind up in some kind of a study ... as traffic.
traffic. Those.
hundreds of jobs created by Physical Electronic, bring just
prlem,
a s those
snecesaryw,eit have
sh uldcreated
haveista Norseman
at that time, then youfwouldaf-
fic Y •
be done by now.
I would like to give you a few gross figures of holding costs. The value I am
using is the value the City used for issuing real state tax for the year 1974
and the taxes is what was due and payable
I am including the last parcel inNorseman Industrial Park because that cannot
be used before 1 have the 74th Street problem resolved. Here$are
98,the
figures:
1. 16 Acres valued at $98,000.00 •
2. 2.6 Acres in Norseman Industrial Park, g3,000,00
calued at $43,000.00 000.00
Total Value - for tax purposes • $ 141 141,—
$ 14,100.00 •
Annual Holding Cost on value figure - 10% ll800.00
�r—
Taxes $ 25,900.00 i
Total Holding Cost - per year
- per month 2,158.00
- per day 71.00
- per hour 2.95
(roughly speaking $3.00/hr
around the clock, 365 days
a'year) .
The Holding Cost from your January 24 meeting, to 1,490.00
your February 24th meeting, figures out to be ....
It speaks for itself. Men holding costs get that high, we have to make it
ready for the market, and hope for a sale.
•
,;;+,' r' 141113 •
City of Eden Prairie
February 14, 1977 - Page #4 ; •
•
ti
•
Real Estate Taxes •
•
It may or may not have some interest to you to receive information about the
difference in real estate taxation between me and the two home owners. To-
gether they have about 7 acres, and I will compare them with what I pay for
7 acres in my parcel. On one acre of my land, I pay $471.00 a year, on 7 acres
this amounts to roughly $3,300.00. My neighbor pays less than $3,000Yor their
7 acres. In my opinion, this seems like they arc paying no taxes for their
home. I have a hard time accepting this as being fair. However, that is not
'the worst part of it. What I think is worse is that if those two neighbors, in
some way or another, make the city prevent me from using my land for what it has
been proposed to be on several plans, then I feel I have a right to rebel.
Last year I cleared out all my tax liability on my sixteen acres - it was close
to $40,000.00 or $2,500.00 per acre. If I knew at that time that I would be de-
nied the right to use my land, I would have kept my money, and dropped my land.
Therefore, if the City exercised their right to issue heavy taxes, and also ex-
ercise their right to delay and deny zoning, they can squeeze property out of
the hands of anybody they wish . even if the reason were only that they didn't
like his personality or his broken English. I absolutely do not think that local
government was invented for this purpose. And when we are talking about taxes,
it might be worth while to knew that if this land is rezoned, it will give room
for 200,000 sq. ft. of industrial buildings with a taxation of 40C a foot .. this
will amount fo $80,000 a year. Can the City afford to put down such on opportun-
ity when they have to guarantee over $2,000,000 in order to get the same tax
benefet frem other company.
There has been a rather slow growth in the Golden Triangle. Last year I don't
think that more than ten acrews were used for building. At that rate it will
take over 50 years to build up the Golden Triangle, and by knowing the holding
costs you can just about figure out what an acre will cost about 50 years from
now.
•
Will you do me a favor and respond to a little question? Take a moment or two
and make yourself believe that this property is owned by you, or your retiring
father who is deprived of turning his property into cash, and is responsible
for its holding costs. What would you then do with this property?
My conclusion is then:
1. Rezone Parcel P2005 from Rural to 1-2 Park, something which all your
proposed plans have shown.
2. Have 74th Street built westward to serve the south end of this parcel •
•
as your present guide plan shows: This street has to be built, no
matter what kind of a Valley View Road you use.
3. Take immediate steps to plan and install utility to this property.
I hope this information has been useful for you for the valuation of my situation
as well as the City. Therefore, I hope you will•go along with my proposal and•
recommend for approval by the City Council.
.Resp ctf, ily submitted,
;, • Merl eiv Hello �-✓•
•
•
•
rolL
riomrirm
uu
PLA�/.nlPORTATION/ENGINCERING/ARCNITECTURE
February 10, 1977 •
MEMORANDUM •
•
To: Richard Putnam
From: = Richard Wolsfeld 6)
Subject: Review of Road Plans for Lake Smetana Sector
•
•
•
As per your request BRW has completed an analysis of the follow-
ing traffic issues in the Lake Smetana Sector:
o Need for a road to connect the Valley View/Co.Rd.
• 18 interchange with the proposed ring road.
•
• o Relationship of the road to the extension of
Shady Oak to Valley View/Co.Rd. 18 interchange.
o Type of road that will be required to serve the
expected traffic to, from, and through the area.
o Location of the road between the two points.
The analysis and the results are discussed below.
Background Material
The following resource material was reviewed and utilized in
the analysis:
o Eden Prairie Staff Report - "Lake Smetana Sector
Study", dated June 20, 1974.
o Hennepin County Transportation System Study, BRW,
October, 1976.
DAINER,RINGROSE,WOLSECLD,INC 7101 YORK AVENUE SOWN CDINA.MINNESOTA.S435 PHONE 612/831.23C0
LILT;r �/ '
•
• Richard Putnam • ti
February 10, 1977
Page 2 .. . .
•
Need For Road Connection
This sector of land is extremely unique in the way it is
surrounded by controlled access.freeways. If the interchange
of Co. Rd. 18/1-494 is upgraded, there will be only 3 ways
.into or out of the area.
Connecting the access points in the most direct manner possible
has the following advantages:
o Provides maximum accessibility for properties
within the sector in all directions.
o Helps to balance the traffic loadings en the
various roads.
•
o Tends to minimize the amount of travel and •
tt ;•ns in the area.
o Provides the most direct route across the sector
for any trips from outside the area desiring to
cross the area.
r
Thus, the concept of connecting the access points to the area
with a road system, as presented in the Composite 1974 Plan for
Lake Smetana is logical and valid.
Relationship of Connecting Roads
Figure 1 illustrates two possible relationships for the major
connecting roads in the sector. The traffic planning principles
that apply to this situation include:
o Minimize the number of turns for the heaviest
flow of vehicles.
o Intersect the major roads at right angles.
Since both schemes intersect at right angles, the primary concern
is to minimize the number of turns. Analysis of the composite
plan indicates that more traffic would have access to the exten-
• sion of Shady Oak than to Valley View when the area is fully
developed. Therefore, Method 2 is preferred over Method 1.
In addition, Shady Oak has route continuity to the northwest,
• whereas Valley View ends at the proposed ring road.
•
J L-1
Richard Putnam i
. February 10, 1977
Page 3 .
Type of Road Required To Serve Traffic
The third major issue to be addressed is the required road type
(i.e. two-lane, four-lane, etc.) to serve the traffic along the
Valley View corridor. The key indicator of the size of road
required is the forecasted volume. The forecasted volumes in
the Composite Plan have been reviewed and found to be reasonable.
The key variable is the intensity of industrial use that actually
results; the concept of using the average value for trip genera-
tion is reasonable. Using a capacity of 840-1 ,000 vehicles/
hour/lane for an urban arterial in BRW's opinion is a little
high; 600-800 vehicles/hour/lane is more reasonable. However,
if a lower capacity is used, the degree of failure by the road
system increases.
Designing Valley View and Shady Oak as four-lane, divided road-
ways certainly is a conservative vehicle anu
posture
require
alower
ng
land use intensities, changes in
• of work hours. The real restricting factor is the capacity of
the interchanges; there is no value in bringing a six lane
changeathat with
can only capacity
handle 1,800 vehicles/perr up hour. an inter-
s g
A good balance between the interchange capacities and the connecting
road system geometries is to design Valley View and Shady Oak as
four-lane arterials with turn lanes at major intersections.
Location _of Roadway Within Valle Vjew Corridor
The next key issue is where the required four-lane arterial
roadway in the Valley View corridor should be located. Two
options exist (Figure 2).
• upgrade the existing Valley View
•
o build a new road
In evaluating these two options many factors should be taken
in account. This report only evaluates the options from a
traffic engineering viewpoint.
Existing Valley View Road is a road with curves of less than
30 mph design speed, grades in the range of 6%, and the road is
cut into hills in many cases. All of these characteristics
result in lowering the capacity of the road. According to the
• "Highway Capacity Manual" published by the National Academy of
Sciences the capacity of a roadway is reduced by the following
percentages for rolling terrain and lateral obstructions.
•
•
Richard Putnam
February 10, 1977
Page 4
•
Factor % Reduction
Rolling Terrain 17 •
Lateral Obstructions _ 15
Thus if Valley View were upgraded to four lanes and had rolling
terrain and lateral obstructions, the capability to carry
vehicles would be 32% less than a roadway on level terrain and
no lateral obstructions.
Another factor is the problem associated with mixing traffic
types. A general traffic planning principle is to separate
industrial/employment related traffic from residential traffic.
From traffic engineering standpoint, these two factors would
suggest a relocation of Valley View.
•
Conclusions •
The conclusions of this analysis from a traffic engineering
viewpoint is to build a relocated Valley View Road as a four -
lane arterial with turn lanes at major intersections. This
road should intersect at right angles with both the extended
Shady Oak and the Ring Road. The specific location of Valley
View is beyond the scope of this effort.
RW:ju
•
••
•
•
•
•
A A
4 r
. A -i
oA m
II
. • - Z
U.5, 164
m 4- S . .-+
v a y 1,'t,y- oy m
.r 4.. d0 K
m
GO RP 16 • Q
0
. (1)
• m 21
• n C
4 m
Z ...
• Z
m
• n
A�•
0 i
O >
•. A
U.g, 16_ • n '
• m
z 1 ��4t4.'' o C
-' `�w �sr o
N •-Ir
• Z
i7.P.D.IFS • GO +
1
. I
I UIGA'
•
• �_
Q.4' •
•
•
Dr
m <<Fy .
. z 1.1%, ,
A
-1
. ."4 m 7.4-
• p m
WASNIN6TON AYE. ` m
to, RD. is -ailli� C
yr
rr- 3,3 „
m0 G)
•
p m
. FriA N
`c --1
. �� 70 Z
O
o c
jn���7}
O il
O VJ
m sio
•
. b .
WASNM[TOSS AVE.
9_D. 18 �►- •'
,
•
•
• G. T. •MORK Pa CO. •
LNCORPORATED •
TELEPHONE THE MORK RUILDINO
•AREA CODE 612 0860 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH
941-3E40 EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343
January 28, 1977 •
•
City of Eden Prairie
8950 County Road #4
Eden Prairie, MN 55343 •
Re: Industrial Land
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Gentlemen:
As you are no doubt aware,last Fall we purchased 4.9 acres of property from
Mr. Herieiv Helle on the corner of Valley View Road and Washington Avenue
South.
We started construction of our project, VALLEY SQUARE, approximately August 17,
1976 and in the five months since we begun the project, we are now approxi-
mately 60; leased.
This letter is to serve as notice that if Mr. Helle's property to the west
of my lot had proper zoning with adequately sized utilities, access, etc.,
we would enter into serious negotiations with Mr. Helle for the purchase of
same.
We have consistently enjoyed the spirit of cooperation shown to us on the part
of the City and have always been able to lease our properties that we developed
along Washington Avenue.
Warme personal regards,
G. Mr' O.
G. T. Mork •
President
GTM:baj
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEI'IN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-107
A RESOLUTION FOR LEASING EQUIPMENT FOR PARK DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant to Preliminary approval_ of a HUD Community Development Contract
granting to the City of Eden Prairie Federal Funds for the purpose of developing the
Edenvale and Preserve Parks, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to preliminary approval of a 1977 LAWCON Contract granting to the
City of Eden Prairie Federal Funds for the purpose of developing the Round Lake Park,
and •
WHEREAS, pursuant to the bids received August 11, 1977.
NOW, THLREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council does direct the City Manager
to execute a contract with thelonest qualified bidder immediately upon notification
from the Hennepin County Community Development Grant Program of the appropriate and
final HUD approvals for that part of-the contract dealing with the HUD funding and that
the City Council does direct the City Manager to execute a contract with the lowest
qualified bidder for that part of the contract dealing with LAWCON funding immediately
upon notification from the State Planning Office of final Bureau of Outdoor Recreation
approval.
ADOPTED by :le rii_y Council of the City of Eden Prairie this _ day of
,1977.
Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, Clerk ��
ii
M E KI 0
TO: Mayor and City Council
PROM: Chris linger, Park Planning /Development and Forestry
liIROUGII: Marty Jesscn, Di rector of Community Services
DATE: August 12, 1977
SUBJECT: MD SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF PARK CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Included with this report is the compari son chart of heavy equipment
companies who bid on construction equipment for lease this year. This
equipment would be used by our crews this year for grading at Edenvale
•
Park, The Preserve Park and Round Lake Park, as was done at Prairie
View las year.
We plan to use three 11 cu.yd. self-loading scrapers, one 65 hp small
dozer and a 105 hp medium dozer for a period of approximately three
months this Fall.
Staff recommends taking a three month lease rate for purposes of
awarding the hid to the lowest qualified bidder.
Low bids would be:
ill I] yd. scraper Ziegler $5,700/3 mn. (Cat)
H2 11 yd. scraper Valley Equipment $9,000/3 mo. (John Deere )
113 11 yd. scraper Valley Equipment $9,000/3 mo. (John Deere ) !!
medium dozer Case $6,000/3 mo. (Case)
*small dozer A$M Tractors $3,000/3 mo. (International)
Inc. •
TOTAL THREE MONfII LEASE $35,700
. i
*The small dozer was bid with a lease purchase option which would
enable us to purchase the machine for future park and trail con-
struction minus l00 of lease if desired. A 6 M Tractors, Inc.,
would have a low bid of $14,300.
CE:jj
-S36�'
•
I
Rill 5IIM8At1 1971 PARK CONSTRUCTION tints I1III'?ilNT LEASE
kg!" Case Ryan valley I6m i)+ment A 8 M _ Low Rid
11 yd. scraper 11 $3,400 ---- $4,075 $3,400
1 month 3 month 8,700 ---- 11,616 $8,700s16.00
Hourly over 160 hr/mo. 16.00 ---- 21.65
31 yd. Sc r/('er(2
1 mouth --`- - $3,000 $3,000
3 month $10,200 --- 9,000 $9,000
Hourly over 160 hr/ma. 16.50 ----
35.00 $16.50
31 yd ScraperT13_
1 month ---- $3,000 $3,000
3 month $10,200 ____ 9,000 $9,000
Hourly over 160 hr/mo. 16.50
__.. - 35.00 $16.50
Medium toner H07 hp. 2 000
1..month $2,700 $2,000 $2,760 $2,650 $
3 month 7,500 6,000 7,866 7,950 $6,000
Hourly over 160 hr/ma. 13.00 12.50 14.66 30.00 $12.50
Small Dozer 65 Il.
1 month $1,300 $1,395 $1,450 01 $1,350 not within $1,200 $1,200
02 $1,050 specs $3,000
3 month $3,150 $4,185 $4,134 01 $4,050 not within 3,000 $6.00
Hourly over 160 hr/mo. 02 $3,150 specs
Hourly over 160 hr/mo. 6.00 8.72 7.70 0 1 20.00 not within 9.50
02 20.00 specs
Purchase Option
minus lease (100:1
Small Dozer $22,500 $17,50D aai,it6 01 $21,5011 not within $14,300 $14,300
02 $15,500 specs
•
•
•
•
•
•
?5.3c 7
•
TO: Roger Ulstad
FROM: John Frane
DATE: August 11, 1977
RE: Municipal Industrial Revenue Bonds for Covenant Living Centers
Covenant Living Centers, Inc. are asking the city for preliminary approval
for issuance of $7,500,000 for MIDB's to partially finance their Tudor Oaks
project. Because the project is a new venture i.e. a separate corporation
and a "non profit" residential/care facility the guidelines we have used
in granting approval for MIDB issues for commercial and industrial projects
are not applicable.
The strength of the bonds is directly related to the marketing of the units;
Covenant Living Centers has initiated an aggressive campaign including a
model apartment in the Eden Prairie Center, T.V. and newspaper ads. 6% of
the units have been contracted for as of today, which indicates to me that
the project is very likely to succeed. An appraisal to determine the market
value of the project by an appraiser approved by the city may be required.
There are two alternatives to financing, a public sale of bonds, as we have
had in the past; or a private place,hei.i. to financial institutions. Should
the private placement occur, the city should not have to become involved
in a review prior to passage of a final resolution of approval. The
willingness of these institutions to accept the bonds or a mortgage
instrument would be evidence to me that the project is viable.
Attached is a time schedule furnished by Damn, Kalman and Quail who are
working with Covenant Living Center on this project.
•j;:i
Time Schedule
•
July 77 Marketing of the apartments begins from the model in
Eden Prairie Center.
August 77 Preliminary Resolution passed by City of Eden Prairie.
September 77 When approximately 25Z of the units have been sold, Francoeur
and Company will sell $5.75 million Of Direct Obligation
Notes. These will be secured by escrowed accomodation fees.
•
November 77 $7.5 million of first mortgage revenue bonds are sold
• publicly. These bonds will he escrowed until the building
is completed and certain occupancy levels have been reached.
(A commitment for a private placement would be obtained
at this point.)
February 78 Construction loan of $7.0 million is available to complete
•
the project.
July 78 One wing, the commons and support areas, are completed.
The first occupants will be moving in.
January 79 The balance of the facility is completed and the nursing
home is opened. The bonds are released from escrow to
replace the construction loan and provide permanent
financing. (The primsr, pl.,cement loan would replace the
construction loan at this point.)
March 79 The Direct Obligation Notes will be called with funds
from accomodation fees.
Public Sale
1) The Metropolitan Health Board and the State Board reviewed the entire
project and granted a Certificate of Need. The Certificate applies to
the nursing care beds but the entire project is thoroughly reviewed.
2) The City of Eden Prairie passes a preliminary resolution. This would
be your agreement in principle to the desirability of having the project
located in Eden Prairie and financed with tax-exempt revenue bonds.
3) A feasibility study is performed by Englehart and Co. This study will
analyze the service area, related facilities, and make independent
projections of financial statements.
4) Bond Counsel reviews all documents and gives an opinion as to the
legality and tax-exempt status of the bonds.
•
Public Sale (con't)
5) Eden Prairie passes a final resolution authorizing the issuance
and sale of first mortgage revenue bonds.
6) The Bonds are reoffered to the general public and institutions. The
proceeds are escrowed until project is constructed and certain
occupancy levels have been reached.
•
Private Placement
1) The Metropolitan Health Board and the State Board reviewed the entire
project and granted a Certificate of Need. The Certificate applies
to the nursing care beds but the entire project is thoroughly
reviewed.
•
2) The City of Eden Prairie passes a preliminary resolution. This would
be your agreement in principle to the desirability of having the project
located in Eden Prairie and financed with tax—exempt revenue bonds.
3) A valuation of the project would be performed by an MAI appraiser.
It would use three different means (income approach, market valuation,
and cost approach) to arrive at an accurate valuation.
4) pain, Kalman S Quail locates financial institutions that will purchase
the entire issue. The institution will have a maximum Loan to Value of 75%
($7.5 million loan maximum on $10.0 million valuation). The type of
institution will determine whether the debt instrument is a bond or a
mortgage.
5) Bond Counsel reviews all documents and gives an opinion as to the
legality and tax-exempt status of the bonds.
6) Eden Prairie passes a final resolution authorizing the issuance and
sale of the first mortgage revenue bonds.
RESOLUTION 77-110
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO
A PROJECT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT, REFERRING THE PROPOSAL
TO TIIE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR
APPROVAL, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AND PREPARA-
TION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found, determined and declared as
follows:
1.1. The welfare of the State of Minnesota requires
active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of
economically sound industry and commerce through governmental
acts to prevent, so far as possible, emergence of blighted lands
and areas of chronic unemployment, and the state has encouraged
local government units to act to prevent such economic deterior-
ation.
1.2. Covenant Living Centers-Minnesota, Inc. , ?
Minnesota non-profit corporation engaged in the business of
owning and operating retirement and long-term care facilities
(hereinafter the Company) , has advised this Council of its
desire to acquire, construct and equip a retirement complex
consisting of land, a 240 unit retirement apartment building,
an 80 bed long-term care facility and related and incidental
food service facilities and equipment and furnishings (here-
inafter referred to as the Project) , for use by the Company
in its business operations. The Project and the proposed
financing method are more fully described in a written pro-
posal Of the Company which is on file with the City Finance
Director-Clerk.
1.3. The existence of the Project within the City
would provide additional retirement housing and long-term care
facilities for elderly residents of the City and surrounding
area and would also provide increased employment opportunities
within the City, all of which is in the public interest and
will promote the welfare of the City and its residents.
J,3-)3
1.9. The City has been advised by the Company that
conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of
the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such •
high costs of borrowing that the feasibility of acquiring and
constructing the Project would be significantly reduced and
if acquired and constructed the costs of operating the Project
would be significantly increased. The Company has also advised
the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and its
resulting low borrowing cost, the Project is economically
feasible and the costs of operating the Project and the cor-
relative cha.yes to the residents will be significantly reduced
and the Company has represented to the City that such municipal
financing will constitute a substantial inducement to the
Company to undertake the Project within the City.
1.5. This Council has been advised by representatives
of Dain, Kalman & Quail, Incorporated, of Minneapolis, Minnesota,
investment bankers and dealers in municipal bonds, that on the
basis of information submitted to them and their discussions
with representatives of the Company and potential buyers of tax-
exempt bonds, it is their opinion that revenue bonds of the City
could be issued and sold to finance the Project.
1.6. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 479, to issue its revenue bonds to finance capital pro-
jects consisting of properties used and useful in connection
with a revenue producing enterprise, such as that of the Coinpanj,
and the issuance of such bonds by the City would be a substantial
inducement to the Company to undertake the Project.
2. On the basis of information given the City to date,
it appears that it would be in the best interest of the City to
issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of Chapter 474 to
finance a part of the costs of the Project at a cost presently
estimated to be approximately $7,500,000.
3. The Project above referred to is hereby given pre-
liminary approval by the City and the issuance of bonds for such
purpose and in such amount approved, subject to approval of the
Project by the Commissioner of Securities and to the mutual
agreement of this body, the Company and the initial purchasers
of the bonds as to the details of the bond issue and provisions
for their payment. In any event, it is understood, however,
that the bonds of the City shall not constitute a charge, lien
or encumbrance legal or equitable upon any property of the City
except the Project, and the bonds, when, as, and if issued,
shall recite in substance that the bonds, including interest
thereon, are payable solely from the revenues received from the
Project and property pledged to the payment thereof, and shall
nut-constitute a debt of the City.
-2-
4. The form of Memorandum of Agreement relating to the
issuance of revenue bonds of the City to finance the cost of the
Project is hereby approved and the Mayor ':.:;I City Manager are
hereby authorized and directed to execute. he Memorandum of
Agreement in behalf of the City.
5. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01,
Subdivision 7, the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed
to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner of
Securities for his approval of the Project. The Mayor, City
Finance Director-Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney and other
officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized
to provide the Commissioner with any preliminary information he
may need for this purpose, and the City Attorney is authorized
to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as
may be appropriate to the Project, if it is approved by the
Commissioner.
Mayor
Attest:
City Finance Director-Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Member , and the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted
and was presented to the Mayor who approved and signed the same,
which was attested by the City Finance Director-Clerk.
1415 -3-
{
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
THIS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT, dated as of
1977, between the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"),
and Covenant Living Centers-Minnesota, Inc. (the "Company") ,
provides as follows:
1. Preliminary Statement. Among the matters of mutual
inducement which have reaulted in this Agreement are the following:
(a) the City is authorized and empowered by the
provisions of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, as
amended (the "Act") , to issue revenue bonds to defray
the costs of a project as defined in the Act.
(b) the Company has proposed that the City, pur-
suant to the Act, .issue its revenue bonds to defray
the costs to be incurred in connection with the acqui-
sition, construction and equipment of a retirement
community complex, consisting of a 240 unit retirement
apartment building, a 60 bed long-term care facility
and related and incidental food service facilities,
(the "Project"), and the City and the Company enter
into a lease, sale or loan agreement or similar
agreement satisfying the requirements of the Act
(the "Revenue Agreement") .
(c) the Company wishes to obtain satisfactory
assurances from the City that the proceeds of the sale
•
?7G
1
of the revenue bonds of the City will be made available
to finance the costs of the Project.
(d) subject to due compliance with all require-
,
ments of law and the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, the City by virtue of such statutory 1
authority as may now or hereafter be conferred by the
Act, will issue and sell its revenue bonds in an
amount not exceeding $7,500,000 (the "Bonds") to pay
a portion of the costs of the Project.
(e) the Bonds shall be limited obligations of
the City and the principal of and interest on the
Bonds shall be payable solely out of the revenues
derived from amounts payable to the City by the
Company pursuant: to the provisio;:. of the Revenue
Agreement.
2. Undertakings on the Part of the City. Subject to
the conditions stated in (d) and (e) of paragraph 1 hereof, the
City agrees as follows:
(a) that it will authorize the issuance and sale
of the Bonds, pursuant to the Act as then in force and
upon terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the
City and the Company, and
• (b) that, if the Bonds are issued and sold, it
will enter into the Revenue Agreement with the Company
upon such terms ant] conditions as are mutually agree-
able to the City and the Company and as satisfy
-2-
the requirements of the Act.
3. Undertakings on the Part of the Company. The
Company agrees as follows:
(a) that it will use all reasonable efforts to
find one or more purchasers for the Bonds, and
(b) that contemporaneously with the delivery of
the Iloncds the Company will enter into the Revenue Agree-
ment with the City upon such terms and conditions as
are mutually agreeable to the City and the Company and
as satisfy the requirements of the Act, and
(c) at such time as the Bonds are sold, and deli-
vered to the purchasers thereof, the Company will reim-
burse the City for all reasonable and necessary expenses,
including fees and expenses of counsel, incurred by the
City in connection with the authorization, sale and
delivery of the Bonds.
4. General Provisions.
(a) all commitments of the City under paragraph
2 hereof and of the Company under paragraph 3 hereof are
subject to the condition that within (r)
months from the date hereof (or such other date as shall
be mutually staisfactory to the City and the Company) , the
City and the Company shall have agreed to mutually accept-
able terms and conditions of the Revenue Agreement, the
Bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating
to the Bonds.
(b) if the events set forth in (a) of this para-
graph do not take place within the time set forth or
any extension thereof and the Bonds are not sold within
such time, the Company agrees that it will reimburse
the City for all reasonable and necessary direct out-
of-pocket expenses which the City may incur at the
Company's request arising from the execution of this
Agreement and the performance by the City of its obli-
gations hereunder, and this Agreement shall thereupon
terminate.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered
into this Agreement by their officers thereunto duly authorized
this day of , 1977.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
By
Mayor
Attest:
City Manager
COVENANT LIVING CERTERS-MINNESOTA, INC.
By
Its
Attest:
Its
i �
i�� 1(i -4-
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager"'f'
SUBJECT: Architectural Firms for Fire_Stations
DATE: August 12, 1977
As a result of the successful bond referendum in June, 18 architectural firms
expressed their interest to he considered in the selection process. In hiring
an architectural firm one has to assume all firms are technically qualified.
From that point the process is one of selecting a firm that provides imagination,
scope of experience, helpful suggestions, works successfully with other governmental
agencies, and the most reasonable cost.
An eight member connnittee consisting of firemen, the Public Safety Director,
and Supervisor of Inspections,interviewed each interested firm, spending up to an
hour with each firm. These interviews resulted in the ranking of all firms based
on the guidelines outlined above. I have personally interviewed the three firms
having the highest ranking as recommended by the Committee. They are as
follows:
1. Lindberg Pierce, Inc.
512 Nicollet Mall Building
Minneapolis, Mn 55402
2. Dickey/Kodet/Architects/Incorporated
4930 France Avenue South
Minneapolis, Mn. 55410
3. Peter Racchini and Associates
716 Third Street
White Bear Lake, Mn. 55110
Based on their individual presentations and personal field inspection of past
•
projects, I recommend the firm of Dickey/Kodet/Architects/Incorporated as the
acceptable consultant to provide architectural services to the City (total fees
of 030,304) for Council consideration. My recommendation is based on the
following: The Dickey/Kodet firm has worked with a number of municipal clients
in the metropolitan area. These have been the City of Edina (2 fire stations,
Public Library, YMCA); City of New Brighton (City Hall, maintenance building,
liquor store); City of New Hope (maintenance building, fire station, liquor store).
I have also checked with each of these three communities regarding their relationship,
satisfaction of service, and would they continue to employ their services
in the future if afforded the opportunity. All communities responded favorably.
I would be happy to answer any questions the Council may have regarding my
reconmeendation.
•
RKU:jp
DATE: July 15, 1977
TO: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Council Members, and City Manager
FROM: Jack Hacking, Public Safety Director
SUBJECT: Architectural Firms Interviewed for Fire Station Construction Project
Ackcrherg and Associates, Inc. tntrikin-Domholt-King, Inc.
1016 Marquette Avenue 503 Wesley Temple Bulidin9
Minneapolis, MN. 55403 Minneapolis, MN. 55463
Mr. Ldain Mackie - 8-11% ya iD Mr. Domholt - $44,324.
** The Architectural Offices H. W. Fridlund, Puchie:-`
4941 trance Avenue South 4501 Minnetonkc Bou: .i. n
Minneoolis, MN. 55410 Iliuncapolis, MA. c, ,.iI if
Mr. Jack Ovick -
$35,000.-3°8('n Mr. Brice Cell - $.6,u`I')
Arretrong, Torseth, Skold and Rydeen, Inc. George Klein and Cu.;;,;n'
4901 Olson Memorial Highway 185'-0 Minnetonka Bcn.l;
Minneapolis, MN. 55422 Ireephaver, !'.N. 55u,':.l
Mr. Kenneth L. Skold - 7'% - 3$,cco Mr. Cliff Buitema - /
** Berystedt, Wahlberg, Bergquist, Rohkohl * Lindherg Pierce, Inc.
400 Sibley Street 512 Nicollet Mall 8.tii im;
St. Paul, MN. 55101 Minneapolis, MN. 55.1;
Mr. Lloyd F. Bergquist - 7-8 $40-45,000. Mr. Robert Pierce - 5.). .iU •
Bettenburo. Townsend, Stolte and Comb, Inc. * Leonard Parker Associates
1437 Marshall Avenue 430 Oak Grove
St. Paul, MN. 55104 Minneapolis, M:I. 55403
Mr. George B. Townsend - $35,000. Mr. Dennis F. Reseutek - $37,, `c•
•
** Thomas Carmody * Peter Racchini and Associate:.
8595 Mitchell Road 716 Third Street
Eden Prairie, MN. 55343 $25,00d. Verbal White Bear Lake, MN. 56:1:1
Mr. Peter Racchini - "•`.., '
dars M. Cooperman and Associates
Shelurd Tower * Rieke-Carroll-Muller A. .e,:i,,r . , inc.
Minneapolis, MN. 55426 1011 First Street South
Mr. James M. Cooperman - 7% Hopkins, MN. 55343
Mr. Thomas Nipper - $46,',t0
Design Two, Inc.
701 highway 7 Smiley Glotter As•so ;..t .. I ...
Excelsior, MN. 55331 1021 LaSalle Avenue
Mr. Nick Ruehl - $43,875. Minneapolis, MN. !,5.10l
Mr. Jerry Gockelman - >'no,o.. !- ,. .
Otcle!y/16 det/Architects/Incorporated
* 4930 trance Avenue South Trossen, Wright and A so:..,ccc•.
Minneapolis, MN. 55410 161 Fast Marie Avenue
Mr. Edward J. Kodet, Jr. - $30,304. St. Paul, MN. 55118
= Mr. Ben Samuel,- 81.,.:
Total cost of construction to include architect fees is S585,Ou0.00
* Selected by the committee to be presented to thy' Lden Prairie City council a'. our
recoranendation for the final five applicants.
Selection committee
Jack Hacking, Public Safety Director
Gene Jacobson, Assistant Fire Chief -- Engineer Minneapolis Honeywell
Bruce Bren, Fire Fighter -- Construction Supervisor Ecklund '.n: dlu+d Hvr,
Walter Johnson, Chief building inspector City of Eden Prairie -Registered arrhitoct
Gerald Schwankl, Fire Lieutenant -- Architectural draftsman
Lowell Lund, Fire lieutenant
Ronald Burke, Fire lieutenant -- Cement contractor
Stan Riegert, Fire Captain
** Have done previous work for the City of Eden Prairie.
Each applicant was interviewed by the selection committee in the Public Sati:y
Department offices. Six applicants were requested to return before the cor:oi:.,,r:::
for a crcrnd interview.
In addition to the above Chief Hacking made himself available to all of the
architectural firms for additional information and tours of the possible loaations.
Public Safety Director Jack Hacking, Chief Mitchell and Assistant Chief Jac:! rm
will be available at the council meeting to answer any questions.
•
twa
National Corporation for Housing Partnerships
1133 Fifteenth Street,Northwest,Washington.O.C.20005 Tea(2071857-5700
TWX 710-822.1905
August 9, 1977
hr. la)ger
The City of ad-an PrLill'SW
8953 Dien 1'rhric itoad
1..don Fcrairi,_•, In. 55:31:3
Dear lir. listed:
As pa' the rc3q13:!;1. of tile City Council at the meetirv: f Aug,ust 2, 1977,
we are enclosing aaili. copies of a GoctiOn C Transmittel booklet, ,Thction
511icsttca form, a lio.vaing Ar.aistr,nee Payment forin and a Sch&dule 70r
!lousing Aasistidnce 1• ;,,,r.i.;rts form. hi onis; with the Section 8 data na also
enclosed :In vartment ,q.plic:rtion and the in.luiry forme ..Catch nih bc,'
utiliv.ed ira Cr:;:nini; psospectivr, residents of the inth-dope Ap..rtr...ents.
A d.?scription of each form follo•,:s:
SectionC Tr•ed::. 1 1 T:cis handbook contsins process3ng, instructions to implem..:nt
tha 'ecti oa a llaaiaa in rl st,nec payment
"cot
_ ford. supp3y all of the in n formatio needed to
. . .
1.,-rears for tho Cnction S'ab Eddy. The f..actfon f.1
progn%m CPA., fatniliO;; to psy appronirmtcly 25, of their
for rent. Tlyd dsta for this form is oldiJ,ined through the inquiry forms which will
ba e:.•rlein,,d 3r, the fo?.lowing, paragr[Ths.
flous:irM 2.•-sst!,mics. l' •md 11.11.T% 5267.); In ordr?.r to reserve `,.action 8
:-••••..ance r:,:rminta, the cr.ner rust prepare and certify th;a ''ord). This
pr.yr:;ent in sent to eho acts as an intermediate. for Ti-ace
';manta an made on hdhelf of tiee resident rho qualifies for the fdAy.:;idy.
Sched•dl.:: Fer 1. :'wnts Form 8.1!.1). 5;::;0 : This form must be
sulnditt.!d 77lan,; -Ate 52.)7.) fori . IL is a deta3]C:Li break dons of every
claim bein: :slthnitt,d for pay;nent. It will also disclose any movement within the
complex.
;0,a rh::2r; inali or ti On: This form provides us with the initial information we
need to n.,nd out til roper inquiry forms listed below.
It; tunit This fors is a very important inquiry as it sill give a
dotailL(1 e.aiainin of pant rental history. It will enable us to know that the
runt till Is paid on time and the unit will be properly maintained. Generally,
this form be sent to the last two landlords.
Fwvdoym.:nt. '..`cri.fic:itic,a: This form is necessary to determine a person's
for the Saction 8 pro,;ram. Their rent amount is calculated
accod1ng to their Income. Once the annual income is established us then know
whether the resident is eligible for the Section 8 subsidy.
fare in:nn rv: Tins fond is scnt directly to this welfare. recipient's
technicic,:. This form is airnilar to the employment form because it enables us
to detormine an income amount and therefore calculate the rent amount
accordingly.
•
City of Eden Prairie August 9,1977
Page 2
Child Care Te-;^iry: This expenditure is a qualified deduction from on annual
income scent. It. is to he completed by the person caring for the child or
children.
Dank Tnqui_r This form is sent directly to the bank and completed by the
proper personnel. It will release the information needed to calculate a
person's rent. Bank interest is considered income and must be included in
the annual. inccrm> amount.
Persor:r1 Rofor:erues: These character references are also required and can
be obt;incd in writing or verbally over the p;:oeu.
These fors must all be completed and returned to us before a unit would
be rased. The statements supplied to us by these forms must have satisfac—
tory information on them before an applicant's application would be approved.
If not sat` fectory (i.c. poor rental history, poor credit history, ctc.) the
person would be rejected.
The l:aneg:;ment will do everything in it's power to cooperate with the
City of "_;den Prairie in the fields of Social S:.rvices, Public Safety, or any
other matters.
Sincerely,//
�—ftC ✓ C r��6sli,ias�..�
' Joan Anderson
Resident !Tanager
JA/ja
Ens.
530
5
Nue-1:ea.
Off 1103 M.S.OFF...T(11W1'••1t0US1kC MD UMAM et ra LePage a Mat 0 O.,i•
,I
ICr.T10M a 4
1r0V0(00 Also IT xe ct PAYY(M11►R0011441
MN COOT P.UC Teel,IUSSTAN 11AL a t ha OtltTITtU11,C MS TING 14001143 I
APPLICATION FQ:'TENANT ELIGIEILITY a
AND IBC:1ITIFICATIOr9
s
Pahl 1 �_`- -` PART N. PNA•OMM(R OK TO RNINAI ION ___- 'j
A Pair,ct lelembecWes: Pip:., __---..A. holed Idenhbcahoa: 3
Millen _. __. I.Stale Coal ❑LJ(-1 '1 f^ .r
2.Purled Num ❑ber❑❑ ❑❑0 1. 0 I
•--- -- 3.Original Lpplluhnn❑ R<aarnmNro C
n )
•
a
D. A;o'.c.:.,Tp:Naga 1
•
B.Applicant: Y
Nowt Address_ __.-_.. _.^ 4.Minority Code 0
1le/nrminority 4.Spanish kennel, e
-NM
I.Negro/Bbcb b to rota) 4
3-Ameticntndin 601her
Lid Slariry No.�_ atb.- - -' 5. Present lousing ❑ 4
1 U Anom
C. 5tally CAYlgoTitiOn(Let,.,�s y.,aly.A.'-,ado win the 0.es.It1•e(u.4)Ctewly H..I(yy/Itf:(•I..rdesu. 21illout of about to be wit(eul housing
PAA,.Y - - RELA((CROUP
Y(Mnan WANE TO HAPLY HEAP AGO SEX 3Substatard
111 II) c3) ts) try) 4 ShId11d
Ili
1 ----_...... - -- 6.Ptisent lousing Cost❑❑0
T. DISPLACEMENT STATUS:(",
t. E•Ulkn;ta "-IA"al 01rat(' '1
� -- - 1•Gooeree.t Acton S-Pri,o'a AchM 4
• 1-0Ikf fnrtnnpent Action 6-Not Dlsnlr.al
•
4 C. Family Cuo oslto¢ 1
1.Family Status
5. ---) IMesNSr.uae 62 or ooar 0
2•1101/Spouse Disabled 0
6. 3Nead/Syouse Handicapped❑
-1- INono of the oboe Q
ICH;oDO(TIOMAL mLR1RR1 OR IRPAMAR,PAOS)
•
9.Nuder in Family❑0 13. Sea of Head
D. 31maC II.Nc.bet of Minors El 0 P O .
.I
Ph:1VI �•._ ANNUAL AN0?MT 14. Husbad sad pile _ 4
ayu50■ {WRCt,RATS AND TYPE OP INCOME --- - II.Pabst of Bedrooms
NCI. CUR MO ANTICISAT EO Fresno!Qret i_ R
(I) 17) �._ t{) get It.Apof Hood❑❑
•
•
15.Mohr;of Recipients 0❑
16.Sonia)Income:
pone.. (✓aa5110Ire El DoTI..
_: IT. Anutl Mcome ❑❑ ❑❑ Tj'{tun ADWYtOSMAL N RAC
OON,* u tl
.loomora Assets ❑u❑❑❑ i E. 'SETS:(ten.t.Je r twos.Lv...Moo es well a ed a►v) E.AmNb cad Eligibility.
f AIIiLY Ot{CRIYTId1 AMOUNT 00❑❑❑beetle es* 19.WI Assets11--�T br III
❑❑❑❑C 111 EligibilityImm�e
Mom Limit: Etiglbiity: •
li
Il.Lauer Isom 23.lower Income .
00000 0 t
22.YeO Law Income 24. very Low Income
F. Alloole¢ea • ❑❑ ❑❑❑. 0
PA".ILY F.Altaeaceu:
tier Rees 0(SCRIPTIOt1 RITUAL UNUSUAL 25.Medical colt Dose'Esp.!:❑0 0
h(I) «1 (I) (e)
26.Tote Allowance, 2).Income Atte.Alloo.uuM
, ❑❑❑❑ ❑o'..-II-J
G.lemmas mas Assidrla Pa(ment:
28. Grass Rent❑❑❑29. Criss Fxaty❑❑C
Corltde<nton
I IT):YO D,A,7:ARE FOR rt5l:OYI,1'WITH OPS G)NS YAK TP
•
WO ADDITIONAL WOOS IP RRCSIMRT) AND.Y(1NiTANTIAI.Nf.NAN(l.ITA((41%/R)I i1YC
(I)Total 1(w8cl frocrwilintal colon 3) __.. 30.Houma!Assistants Payment L3 Q❑
(2) Tctn2 AIka t.t.Et;cl Eayanw(Line 1 Won Pod D,Ion In 31.Albumen let Utilities and ❑❑❑
(3)Tolz4U.cwatLs.r, 't(So'.dtotwi) 61M(Services
(4)Alt'tin ar l;_Ien(IOW I PaIl II,Iles 10) 32.N11 Sway Corerihdian 0❑❑
(5)Totzl Manta I Icttl of lion 2.3.1) :._-
PART
PART 1 II
•
Ir..) (Steam of Arm leres1 .+._(IND) (Sy..ew.of 0.....e/aawy or/
Wi.:.:ieb;01 t.wtwl Il.l of Tlr(•li el Pb.U.E.Co.?.,site It a.rlslsl ohs I.sake w111/01 I.I...Messes.S.weu.pwwrel.I.o t.say O.pe.ns.sl es
ApYsey d den Cl I.lie io s.y ozr:w rl,Ct.Ito)e.lodio0l.e.
corrected /./;r63DMcN ••
1') '
)
)
HIID-ESe7U
US. DI.I'ANTMI-NT OF HIIUSIE I,AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
SECTION n I/OUSINI: AS:Li:TANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM •
NEW CONSTRUCTION AND SUBSTANTIAL REHABILITATION
HOUSING OWNER'S CEilTIFICATION AND APPLICATION
FOR HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS
TO:(Name anti R dJrep of Payee) PAYEE
ls.HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS 2.AMTS.CLAIMED COVER ALL PAYMENTS 3.NO,OF UNITS UNDER HOUSING :1
PAYABLE ON THE FIRST DAY OF ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS CONTRACT:.
CONTRACT NO.
,19
b.PROJECT NUMBER; NO.OF UNITS UNDER LEASE(AS OF THE
DATE S:IOWN IN ITEM 21:
•
4.MONTH 6.AMT.CLAIMED
•
•
•
B.TOTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PAYABLE S
CERTIFICATION: The undersigned certifies 051 to the best of his knowledge and belief(I)the dwelling unit(s)are in decent,safe and
sanitary condition,(2)the amount requested in this billing and supported by the attached schedule,Form HUD-S2670Alhas been cal-
•
ciliated in accordance with the provisions of tire!lousing Assistance Payments Contract, (3)none of the amounts claimed has been pre-
•
viously claimed or paid, (4)any amounts chimed in this billing which arc due and payable to the families shall be promptly paid to
such families upon receipt of p:ynlent of thus billing and (5)all other facts and data on which the request for funds is based are true
and correct.
(Dare Prepay ed) (Signature of Owner or Authorized Agent/
WARNING: Tula IS U.S.G.1001.providas in p rt hot whwv.a knewinsly and willfully matron or tam a document containing any fakir.Nctittette,or
Itaudolant rtalanlent Or Mntt y,m t ny matte,n 11•1I iut w.u$.on of any dromImont or agency of the Unshod Stator shall Ise fined,not coon than 610,000
Por krrawnwd lot:tot morn than*IVY yawn or both. )
INSTRUCTIONS FOtt PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF FORM HUD-62870
HOUSING OWNER'S CERTIFICATION AND APPLICATION
FOR HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS
General: In order to receive Section S Housing Assistance Payments, the housing owner must prepare and certify Fonn
!IUD-52670,Housing Owner's Certification and Application for Housing Assistance Payments.The named the housing mynas
on Form HUD-52670 mutt be the same as the name in the Housing Assistance Payments Contract.The housing owner shall
submit the Form HUD-52670,together with Form HUD-52670A,Schedule of Housing Assistance Payments Payable,by the
20th of the n:anth for Housing Assistance Payments payable on the flat day of the following month and for all adjustments for
over and underpayments applicable to preceding months.Amounts claimed must be shown separately by munih,and should
agree with the monthly subtotals reported on Form HUD.52670A.Separate Forms HUD•52670 and HUD-52670A must be
submitted each Housing Assistance Payments Contract.
Distribution of the monthly billing forms and the number of required copies to be submitted will depend upon the type of
Housing Assistance Payments Contract that has been executed es follows:
a. Private-Owner Project or PHA-Owner Prof::et.In the case of Private.Owner or PHA-Owner Projects,the Housing Assistance
Payment:Contract is executed between HUD and the Housing Owner.Under this type of contract the Housing Owner shall
submit the original and one executed copy of the Forms HLtD-52670 and HUD-52670A directly to the appropriate HUD
Regional Accounting Division for payment.At the same time the Housing Owner shall submit an executed copy of the
forms to the local HUD field office.
b. Private-Ownerll'HA Project. In the case of a Private-Owner/PIIA Project,the Housing Assistance Payments Contract is
executed between the PHA and the Private Owner.Under this type of contract the Housing Owner shall submit the original
and one executed copy of the Forms HUD52670 and HUD-52670A directly to the PHA.
The Housing Owner is to retain in his files a copy of the Forms HUD-52670 and HUD-52670A.
Heading:
a.To : Enter the name and address including ZIP code of the appropriate Regional Accounting Division or the
appropriate Public Housing Agency.
b.Payee: Enter the name and address including ZIP code of the housing owner.
liens la. - Enter the applicable!lousing Assistance Payments Contract Number.
b. - Enter the applicable Project Number.
Items 2& 3 - Self.explenatory.
Items 4& 5 - Enter each month for which a claim for Housing Assistance Payments is made,and enter the amount claimed
for that month from the monthly subtotals on Form HUD-52670A.
Item 6 - Enter the suns of the Housing Assistance Payments shown in Item 5,which should equal the total on Form •
HUD-52670A,Column(9).
•
•' / OcillPres0-SBs17M
Huo-a2n7o '
46
}°§( . .
CO IA __ -� . . . /
L. z z`
U4 §- . 2
- . §
, ' P.
. --- . . . . . 0
(5 ® z\) K) § |
0 e
1. —
t<0 ] i
J
e
rk r °
ƒ\: z `
( } 2 z
;
(\) ) % CC i
%�2 § _
�2\ J }
(.2 S ; . . .. . .. . . . .
o) ¥ % t2
0 =
ob# 0 ` 0. -
; z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S
§ .
. z
o
: .4 §
•
z .
4 / z
. / (3y/
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION P. l) SUBMISSION OF FORM HUD-52670A
SCHEDULE OF HOUSING ASSIS1ANCE PAYMENTS PAYABLE
General: A Pouq I1111)52670A, Schedule of Housing Assistance Paryments Payable must he prepared and submitted by the
Itousiug Owner will,each haw Ill'I)5 470,110usiu1 Owner'sCerlificatiou and Appircanion tin Hosing Assist;ulee Payment,.The
acli>ity for each month inchtdol in Ibis schedule is In be shown sepia:101y with moodily subtotal,for each ntunth.'fhr monody '
subtotals are to be anered un Fonu I100.5267O.when a tenant occupies ll unlit on a Clay other than die lust day of the month it
vacate,a unit un a day other than the last day of the month Columns(8)and(9)shall he prorated to give effect to the actual
number of days the unit was occupied.Adjustments for over and nrrilci payments for previous honing months are to be included uu
the monthly hillier, under the month to which they pertain.Sep is lc Furors 1111D)-52670 and 111.I13•52670A must be submitted fin
each I lousing Assn' .nee Payment,(but tact.
Heading:
a. Ilousine,Owner: kilter the liaise and address of the housing owner.
•
h. P t e_t Normhei: Enter the agpplierhle project number.
c. Niusil ,1•.i'.t,nce Payments Contract Enter the applicable Housing Assistanac Payments CI'aatact Number.
•
Column(I) • hiller the full name of the tenant.
Colorist(2) - SclI-exoh'natory.
Column(3) - Self-explanatory,
Column(4) - Ilse this space for special comments as retplired.
Column(5) • Caner the date the tenant initially occupied the unit. This information should not be shown in subsequent
submissionsrf this form. •
('.loom(6) - Fmtei the dale the Iona ill,rclually vacated the unit.
Column(7) - outer the total contract rent for the unit.
Column(8) - hour the amount of rum payable by the tenant,or applicable portion thereof,if less titan a full north's occupancy.
('.hump(`)) • Enter the amount of the !lousing Assistance Payment,or applicable portion thereof,if less than a full mouth's
occupancy.
Special Instructions:: If a claim is being submitted to adjust for(I)mueeins and muveouts,(2)vacancies during reimmtp,(3)
vacancies after nn)verut,and tenant damages and/or unpaid rent or(4)payment to families where the Allowance for Htrlities and
Other Services exceeds the asides Gross Family Contribution.the Form Ill/D-52670A shall he completed as follows:
a. Adjustments fin Muveins and Mnvc.uts. Assume a claim is being filed on June 20 for amounts payable on July I.1'he owner
has 1(1 families in occupancy who are expected to he in occupancy on July I.For these 1O families the owner would complete
the Form Ill!0•521 70A for each of the families in occupancy and would enter a subtotal in Column(9)for the total housing
assistance payments payable for the month of July.On the Earns 1011152670,lhere would be one line item showing the
month of July under Item 4,and the total amount of housing assistance for that month under item)5.
Assume further that two families who had been included in the previous month's claim moved oat on June 10,and that two
other families moved in on June IS.The owner will have to report a credit on account of the families who moved out,
representing the 20 days of June during which they were not in occupancy.The owner would complete Columns(I),(2),(3).
(4),(6) and(9) for these two families.Column 4 should include the statement that the family moved out and indicate the
number of days on watch the credit is computed.Column(9)should show the artrount of the credit in brackets.
1'he owner will also have in include an additional claims on account of the new families who moved,in on June 15,for their 15
days of occupancy dining June. For these families Columns(I),(2),(.1),(4),(5),17),(ts)and(9)should he completed.
Column (h) should indicate the number of days occupancy for which the claim is being submitted.The housing owner
would cuter a subtotal in Column(9)for the net amount of the additional claim or credit for the month of June.
On the Form 111.1D.52670 there should he one line item showing the month of June under Item 4,and the amount of the
additional claim or credit under Item 5.
h. Vacancies During Rent-this A claim fit vacancies during rent-up shall not be tirade until the vacancy period(riot to exceed 60
clays)has ended.Colunuls(2).(31,(4).17)and(91 shall he completed foe each vacant unit for which such a claim Is being
made.Column(4),shall include the statement "vacancy dining rent-up" and shall show the number of days the unit was
• vacant.The claim for vacauy dining rent-up shall he included ill Ike monthly subtotal for the month in which tire claim is
bcingsubmitted.
c. Vacancies After Rent-lip and Claims for Tenant Damages and/or Unpaid Rent. A claim under this heading shall not be
submittal until the vacancy pen.;,(not tic exceed o0 days)11ascuded.Culunlnsl l),(_).(3).(41,(6),(7),(h)amtl(tr)shall be
completed for units for+sahib:h elaun is being nude for vacancies atici rcnt•up or lur tenant damages and/or unpaid rent.In
order to Ieccive a claim fan Iacancics after tent-up or(or tenant damages auld)ut unpaid rent the housing clutter nosh first
complete Font I Il i11.521,70."I tann for Payment of 1010 Security Deposit and Compensation for Vacancy Loss"and submit
•
the completed form to the Inc:d 1111)Field Of lice for appu,vul.if IIt!I)approves the clauu the original shall he redinrinell to the
housing uw'ner urrliiating IIUI)appnaval. I Ilk hiirns i11',aw'lll'r Sllullld then attach the approved Form 1l110;526761u the hunt
11311).52670A when Icquesuug payment fit suicides after teat up and for tenant damages and/or unpaid rent.A separate
• Farm 11E1)-52(.76 must be completed fl.r each unit (on which a damn is hermit submitted. Column 141 on the Funs •
IItt/52n7UA should include the statement "see attached Fors IIUI)-52676" All claims shall he included in die monthly
subtotal lie the month in whidr the claim is being subnulleJ.
H1,0'.7411/1A )- •l)
d. (limns v:hcic Icn;nu I annlys Gro:.s Faintly('onitthuroal is less than Ihu Allowance for Utilities 811t1()then Seivkcs, II7 midi
casc>the ownci•11,11 el:mn the Iona! ( nlnact I6•ut.plus the amuuril Icy which the Allowance for I 11110ie.and t)Ihet Sec%ices
exceeds the Giusti 1':nnily(ntnrihul moo. For example,if the Conti:tcl I:ont is S150 and Iltc Allowance for lllililies exeeeds the
{;nos I',�nnly('onudhnlum Icy SIII. the owner::hall claim SIN)nn hehall of lice i wicly.I receipt of payment,the()weer
slid('pay to the f;nuily:IU,replescnthip,the execs:,of the Allowance over the Guess Family('omribulinn.(ulunut(S)of the
loin lit111.52L/UA,shall,how the :miffing of the"excess-in hracfsls.Column(9)will he the sum of('nluntns(7)and CO
for the unit.Column(,I)should include the atalcnteul"excess utility alluwauce".
•
•
•
H l)P b:6/On P. •6r91076.011•14/1122
4J 1-J�JU NOW ttµMk HI Y MANAfkMkNT
Project_ —
APARTMENT APPLICATION
Head of Household _ _ Ago Phone Number
Spouse's Name —__.__— ---Age
Street Address _ _ City and State
Years at Present Address_ Social Security No.of Head of Household _Monthly Rent including utilities S _
Name of Landlord — __ Street Address City&Slate
Previous Home Address ._. How Long
11 now expecting child Marital Status
probable birth date ___. __ Married ._ Single Widowed_—___ Divorced
Street City&
Employer _ Address _State —
Years Time Card Weekly
there Position _ or Badge No. Earnings S
Nome and address
of former employer__ __ __ Years there
Name of Wite's __-- Full Wife's weekly
employer Address income$
Explain other income if any_ —
I
Name of your Full Savings
Bank Address Checking_—_ Loan Account No.
_ Loan __—
Accounts at strrne n•h?n4!tit its,finance etc.:
1.
name of firm street address City&State account no.
2.
name of firm street address City&State account no.
Relative or personal
reference
name full addrese
Amount of monthly payments for
loans,time payments and financing$ _— Year of car License plate number&state
Name,age,sex,relationship,and gross annual income of every person who will live in household.
NAME AGE SEX RELATIONSHIP GROSS ANNUAL INCOME
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7,
e.
Dated _�� t SWEAR THE ABOVE IS TRUE. Signed _.._.
ww..
OFFICE U5E ONLY
bd Ne.__—. DR _ , D ASP ,__,__ Score...__ ABB ABA - OWl•Reed. -
Add'Pymr Pd Full .__ Apt.No. M10
PM rM•M urn tilt. ,. -�-3
•
Name ol Supervisor __ • -----
Phone Number of Employer ...
In case of emergency notify
Address _—
Phone Number
Pets: No _ Yes
Kind _
How did you hear about us?
•
FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT
This is to inform you that as part of our procedure for processing your application,an Investigative report may be made whereby information
Is obtained through personal interviews with third parties, such as family members,business associates, financial sources, friends,
neighbors,or others with whom you are acquainted.This inquiry includes information as to your character,general reputation,personal •
characteristics,and mode of living,whichever may be applicable.
Signature
NOTE:This application is subject to availability of a suitable apartment.
•
•
•
•
5ggcs •
•
•
.IHDSLOP ;r['A'Pr; ;NTS
11345 1.estwind Drive
'den Prairie, Pn.
55343
APPLICATION FOR TENANCY--RENTAL HISTORY
RE: (Applicant)
TO: _ (Former Landlord)
• The above identified person has recently applied for residency in the ':ind-
slope hp rtments and has indicated to us that you have had this family as a tenant
in your prop ety located at:
As indicated hy this Person:; signature noted below, the applicant consents to
the release of information p r•tainin;1 to their rental history to the management of
"inc,lop.: Apartments.
could greatly appreciate your cooperation in completing the applicable
parts below and returning the form to :andslope Apartments.
Please ,...a:!er tha ausutions re&ardirc; the applicant's rental
history:
1. flow long did the Lt ov., applicant reside at this address?
2. Hor: many bedroo:cs? _
3. ahat. t.(:s thy, month; rat-7?
4. 'eas the applicant ec..r uehind in payment of the monthly rent?
5. '.!as the applicant destructive to the apartment or the surrounding public
areas?
6. Did t.ht applicant maintain desirable living conditions, i.e., a well kept
home?
7. Did the applicant gut along with the other residents or neighbors in the area?
8. ':hat was the reason for the applicant leaving your apartment?
9. The applicant's overall conduct while residing in my apartment would be con-
sidered: _:xccllent Good Fair Poor
10. Gould you rent to the applicant in the future?
If not, why? _
11. Additional Comments:
Date Signature
Signature of „ppl:i.ccnt
6)INDSLOPE APARMENTS
11345 Westwind Drive
Eden Prairie, Mn.
55343
REQUEST FOR VERIFICATION OF EhPLOYMENT
TO:
RE: Your Employee:
Address:
Social Security No.:
Gentlemen:
Your employee has applied for an apartment at Windslope Apartments. Your
employee's sitnature at the bottom of this form authorizes you to furnish
the follouin4 information:
Length of employment:
Position or job title:
Base pay (per week or month):
Earnings last twelve months:
Probability of future employment:
Comments:
The above information is to be held in strict confidence.
Please send this inquiry to:
bindslope Apartments
11345 Prestwind Drive
Eden Prairie, Rn. 55343
Signature of Employee
Thant: you for your cooperation.
Date
Employer •
Title
Phone Number
`;3131/
i:IND`'.LOP3 APARTMENTS
NZLFAlt3 11dUIRY
This will authoriz.e the , Department of Public Welfare,
or , to release information regarding my family income.
Date: _. Signature
Gentlemen:
The family named above, which receives assistance from your agency, is an
applicant, fora dww<:Il ng unit. in 'Jindalope Apartments. One of the require—
ments of the Federal law is that in order to be eligible, the total family
income must be within the prescribed income limits. we will appreciate
your cooperation in supplying information indicated below. Please mail
this inquiry to:
aindslope Apartments
11345 t,eetwind Drive
Eden Prairie, Mn.
55343
CONFIDE"'1''. L 'RCO:TJ I1:FO%•.;.TION
A. Number in family
U. honthly family assistance: •
1. Cash
2. Other than cash (average value)
•
C. All other (monthly)
1. Family Earnings
•
2. Regular assistance from
relatives including parents
3. Social Security, etc.
4. Military or Veteran Disability
5. Other cash income
- Date: Signature 1
Title ._
Phone N
;d9'>
IiINDSLO1P, :P/rT ENT:
Pate
CHILD CA'::: Ir:4UI!Y
This will authorise
(person or aE;cncy caring fur child/children)
to release information regarding the child care fees provided for:
Chil.dren's Names: Children's Ages:
Parent's :ignature: Parent's ddress:
To whom it may concern:
The person named above is a resident/applicant for a dwelling unit in l;indslope
Apartments. One of the requirements of the Federal law is that families incomes
must fall 'eithin pr• scribed limits. Lorries expended for child care is a recog—
nized deduction from this income. To complete the records regarding tenant eligi—
bility the following information, in strictest confidence, is hereby requested:
Part A
Names of children being cared for: Ales:
Part B
Overage reekly;mon:my e.:pense:
(Circle on
Thank you for your coop-Jration. Please mail this in;uiry to:
?indslope Apartments
11345 '!estwind Drive
Lden Prairie, 1•.11.
55343
•
Date
KINDSLOFE APARTMENTS
HAMS INQUIRY
This will authorize - T to release information
regarding account number (s)
Signature
Address
Gentlemen:
The person named above is a resident/applicant for a dwelling unit in
Nindslope Apartments. One of the requirements of the Federal law which
provides the subsidy, is that family incomes must fall within prescribed
limits. Interest from savings is considered earnings and must be used in
determining total income. Checking accounts are used as credit references.
The information requested below is for the purpose of determining eligibil—
ity and will be kept in strict confidence.
Thank you for y:.ur cooperation. Please complete the portion below which is
applicable and return this to:
l•.indslope Apartments
11345 Kestwind Drive
Eden Prairie, kn.
55343
Sincerely,
Resident Manager
SAVING3 ACCOUNT:
Date opened Is account active Yes No
Total interest for last twelve months
Projected interest for next twelve months
Current Balance
CHECKING ACCOUNT:
Date opened Is account active Yes No
Signature Bank Name
Title Date:
Phone Number
;;,.iy )
MFMORANUUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services
FROM: Chris Enger, Park Planning/Development and Forestry
SUBJECT: Analysis of Forestry Budget and Subsidy Program
DATE: August 12, 1977
Included with this memo are comparison sheets of budgets, anticipated subsidies,
actual costs, and actual subsidies for 1976 and 1977.
In 1976, since the magnitude of Dutch Elm Disease was not fully realized at budget
time, there was a cost over-run of $10,853.14 by year's end. This cost was offset
by a General Fund transfer. Since sanitation subsidy was not anticipated, no money
was budgeted. However, when the State decided to share in sanitation subsidy
50% for private residential properties, we applied for and received $53,100 to be
used for 1976 subsidies and some indirect related costs.
By the time staff weeded out ineligible property owners and applied the graduated
value rates, actual costs to date for 1976 subsidy total $56,250. The State pays
50% of this, which means that we must return $16,175 of State Funds for 1976.
If we add money budgeted for 1976 to the General Fund transfer made in December
1976, add the State Sul•sidy, plus the 1977 levy amount attributable to 1976, and
compare this to actual costs in 1976, it is possible to carry $15,675 into 1977.
Now that we are better than half way through our 1977 program, and we have had
some clarifications from the State, our costs and grants are clearer. At the
bepinninn of July 1977, staff applied for $159,875 in grants, which would have been
45% of our anticipated costs at that time. We have received a connnittment from
the State of up to $134,236.59, which is 37% of subsidy and related costs and 48% a
of public property reforestation costs. State Subsidizes only residential property
of 5 acres or less.
At this point, we estimate the actual subsidy to which we are entitled to be $98,715.
You can see from the 1977 Forestry Program Sheet that by adding our State Grant, with
the 1976 carry over, with the levy applicable to 1977, against our actual costs, we
have $19,940.80 that could be used towards subsidy of land owners of over 5 acres.
As shown in the report of July 1, 1977, approximately 6,700 trees lie on these parcels.
We estimate 1,000 of these occur in City Parks. This leaves 5,700 trees to be sub-
sidized at some rate.
Alternatives:
1. Subsidize them all based upon some number for trees over 6" in diameter.
2. Subsidize trees over 6" diameter with a limit of 100 trees per parcel. (We
believe this would reduce the number of trees subsidized to 4, 700). If trees
were subsidized at $10/tree over 6" in diameter, this corresponds to roughly
20% of removal cost for large numbers of trees. This also corresponds with
the small residential subsidy which is also about 20%, in most cases, of the
removal cost.
-2-
If the decision to subsidize under alternative 2 at a $10/tree over 6" in diameter
were made, the additional $27,059.20 would have to be levied in 1978 in addition
to the 1978 levy. Based upon this years numbers and subsidizes, 1978 levy should
be about $175,000 plus $27,059 or about $205,000.
SUGGFSTED COUNCIL ACTIONS
1. Approve subsidy for property owners for the following amounts:
1 acre or within 100 feet of residential homes
0-6" diameter tree no subsidy
over 6"-18" diameter tree $25.00
over 18" diameter tree $50.00
Residential property over 1 acre and up to 5 platted acres in size
0-6" diameter no subsidy
over 6" diameter $25.00
All other property over 1 acre
0-6" diameter no subsidy
over 6" diameter $10.00
One free tree for each 1 lost for residential property of 1 acre or less or
within 100' of home, in excess of 6" in diameter, up to 5 total free trees.
2. Approve subsidy policies outlined by staff in July 1, 1977 report.
Who does not receive subsidy?
1. Trees which are cut down which have not been tagged by
our inspectors.
2. Trees which have died from causes other than oak wilt or
Dutch Elm Disease, i.e. construction damage, inflicted
injury, horses eating bark off, etc.
a. If elms have died from any of these causes
and the bark is still tight, they are a Dutch
Elm Disease beetle breeding habitat and will be
ordered down by our inspectors. Owner hauls,
no subsidy.
•
3. Trees not down by deadline (staff should be able to exercise
some discretion based upon substantial extenuating circum-
•. • stances).•
3. Approve application for removal of lower Purgatory Creek from City Control Plan.
4. Approve revised tree disease ordinance. .. ,
1976 FORESTRY PROGRAM
ITEM BUDGET ANTICIPATED ACTUAL COSTS ACTUAL STATE SUBSIDY
STATE SUBSIDY
Personnel $14,000 $14,182.40 $4,209
Equipment
Contracts $ 7,036.96 $3,750
Plant Materials $ 3,400 $ 9,377.50
'Free Tree'
Public Prop.
Reforestation
Miscellaneous $ 4,300 $ 3,311.28 $ 845
Refunds - $ 855.00
Subsidy $56,250.00 $44,300 j$28,125 eligible)
89,303.14 $53,100
- $56,250.00 not - $16,175 overpaid
22,200 $33,053.14 pd.in $36,925
1976
Budgeted 1976 + $22,200.00 Actually Spent 1976 - $33,053.14
General Fund Transfer + $10,853.14 Private Property Sub.- $56,250.00
Dec. 1976 paid 1977 Retro 1976 - $89,303.14
1977 Levy Retro 1976 + $35,000.00
State Subsidy Received+ $36,925.00
1977, Retro 1976
+ $104,978.14
Carry Over To 1977 + $15,675.00
1977 FORESTRY PROGRAM
ITEM BUDGET ANTICIPATED PROPOSED ACTUAL STATE
STATE SUBSIDY REVISION SUBSIDY
Personnel $52,000 $50,440 $18,662 (37%)
Equipment - $28,685 (37%)
Contracts. $ 7,000 $ 2,590 (37%)
Plant Materials
'Free Tree' $20,000 $10,000 $37,000
Public Property $25,310 $12,148.80 (48%)
Reforestation
Miscellaneous $ 9,000 $ 9,000
Refunds - $ 2,700
Subsidy $120,800 $60,400 $99,000 $36,630 (37%)
— I
$201.800 $70,400 $225,850 $98,715.80
1977 Program Cost - $225,850.00
Actual State Subsidy + $ 98,715.80
Carry over from 1976 + $ 15,675.00
Levy applicable to 1977+ $131,400.00
+ 9,940.00
There are approximately 5700 large lot trees that the Council is considering subsidizing.
If a maximum of 100 trees for property were eligible for City Subsidy, this number would
be about $4,700.
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
. FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: August 11, 1977
SUBJECT: Homeward Hills Road Improvements
Feasibility Report
I.C. 51-309
The Council received the feasibility report and a draft of Resolution
77-80 with the August 2, 1977, Council packets, but consideration of
this agenda item was continued to August 16.
We have mailed copies of the feasibility report to all of the petition-
. ers and have rotified them that the report will be formally received by
the Council on August 1.6 and that the Council will consider ordering
the improvements without the need for a public hearing because all the
property Owneis proposed to be assessed have signed a petition.
There have been some questions from one of the petitioners, •The Preserve,
regarding our policy of the standard assessment rates on MSA streets.
We will be prepared to address these questions on Tuesday evening, but
in the event that The Preserve or any other property owner wishes to
withdraw their signature from the petition, it is recommended that the
Council amend Resolution 77-80 by indicating that a petition has been
received, the feasibility report has been received, and that a public
hearing be called for Sept. 6, 1977.
CJJ:kh
•
•
r00-
fib
August 16, 1977
CITY or EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-113
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
OF HIGH POINT THIRD ADDITION
WHEREAS, the play of High Poinf Third Addition has been submitted in the
manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and
the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin-
ances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for High Point Third Addition is approved
upon complianr-e with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
Report on this plat dated August 11, 1977.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8,
Subd. 1 waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat
as described in said Engineer's Report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
thin Resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis-
trar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3.
D. That the City Clerk in hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com-
pliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
Wolfgang 11. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, CLerk
II, a
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Engineering Report on Final Plat
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
THROUGH: Roger fisted, City Manager
DATE: August 11, 1977
SUBJECT: HIGH POINT THIRD ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The developer, The Preserve, is requesting Final Plat approval of
"High Point Third Addition." This is a 7.8 acre plat consisting of
four lots intended for double bungalow use (RM 6.5), one lot consisting
of 5.8 acres intended for the construction of an 84 unit apartment
(RM 2.5), and four outlots for trail system and roadway access use.
The plat is located south of Anderson Lakes Parkway and west of Neill
Lake Road and is a replat of Lot 1, Block 1, High Point.
HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved on February 23, 1976, per Coun-
cil. Resolution f`:1.211.
Zoning to RH 2.5 and RM 6.5 is scheduled for final reading and adop-
tion or, August )6, 1977.
The Final Plat now submitted for approval conforms with the approved
Preliminary Plat.
VP.1:IT,NC:TiS: A variance from Ordinance No. 93, Sec: 8, Subd. 1, waiving the
six month minimum time elapse between the approval date of the Pre-
liminary Plat and filing of the Final Plat will be necessary.
No variances from Ordinance No. 135 will be allowed.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Existing utility service to the double bungalow lots
will require modification to provide eight individual sewer and water
services.
Utilities to serve the 84 unit apartment will be installed and main-
tained by the developer.
PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication for this plat has. been satisfied through
the approved Preserve PUD.
BONDING: A letter of credit has been received in the amount of $3,700 to
cover the cost of modifying utility services to serve the double
bungalows.
Utility service to the apartment complex will be privately owned and
maintained by the developer, therefore no bonding will be required.
- 2 -
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Final Plat of "High Point Third
Addition" subject of the requirements of this report and the following:
1. Execution of the "Developer's Agreement."
2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering
services in the amount of $620.
3. Approval of the "Rezoning Agreement."
4. Approval of the second reading of
Ordinance #351.
CJJ:kh
p1p
' 1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 77-32
AN ORDINANCE-CHANGING THE STREET
NAME OF GARRISON WAY TO AMSDEN
WAY IN THE AMSDEN HILLS ADDITION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
The street name "Garrison Way" is herein changed
to "Amsden Way" within the platted limits of
Amsden Hills Addition.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the 'City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie this 16th day of August, 1977, and finally read and adopted
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
City on the day of , 1977.
Wolfgang H. Fenzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
Published in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1977
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: August 12, 1977
SUBJECT: Street Name Change
Garrison Way to Amsden Way
The owners of all the lots fronting on Garrison Way in Amsden Hills
Addition have petitioned to change the street name from Garrison Way
to Amsden. The name Amsden Way will then be continued through the
Amsden Hills Second Addition up to Anderson Lakes Parkway. The name
Garrison Way will be used in the Garrison Forest Addition to the east
of Amsden Hills.
Recommend adoption of first reading of Ordinance No. 77-32 changing
the name of Garrison Way to Amsden Way in the Amsden Hills Addition.
CJJ:kh
',jf/G I
.ii
I.
��11. vk
fJi )
"
lI[g..«r Ei'V'u
i
June 29, 1977
Air. Roger Uls tad, City Manager '
• City of Eden Prairie
' 8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Re: Roadway Name Change
Dear Mr. Ulatadt
The owners whose names and signatures contained herein
do formally petition that the section of roadway presently
identified as Garrison Way and serving Amsden Hills be re—
namcd Amsden Way at the earliest possible convenience.
Respectfully requested,
'Block 1, Lot 1, 10090 Garrison Way i
/ 2, 10120 " ,1
I/ 5, 10180 " "
Block 2, Lot 1, 10200 " "
7, 10330 " "
8, 10360 " "
9, 10390 " to
Block 4, Lot 5, 10285 " "
6, 10265 " "
Block 5, Lot 20,10085 " "
21,10055 " "
22,10025 " "
23,10005 " "
VERNE/GAGN C1 .
(13lock 1'',-Lot 3, 10140 Garrison Way
?Ion H. PALME HOUSE BUILDERS, 7117 West Shore Drive, Minneapolis
Block 1, Lot-4, 10160 Garrison Way
-r.
A Total Environment Community—8920 Franco Rd.,Eden Prairie,Minn. 55343—(612)941-2001
June 29, 1977
Roadway Name Change
Pogo Two
ROBBEERTH. MASON, INC., 14201 Excelsior Blvd., Minnetonka 55343
Bloc}; 2, Lot 3, 10240 Garrison Way
5, 10280 "
DONALD WILSON
`t'...mo)i(�`
Blockk L 2, Lot , 10260 Garrison Way
KEN KROUCHO
Block 2, Lot 6, 10300 Garrison Way
GARY--,WEGNER
L.
Block. 2, LoL 2, ,,102U0 Garri§on Way / '
i• - •
•
•
.
,
'
•
-0. .. .
. .
• • .
. .
• ' ..
•
. • ,
. . . . ,
'
. .
.11•••••••••••,111.10,101.1M”.....sea.,
'' •
. .
.
17.7.Z -a
ai (i'' 4a-'-•"/ eo.":''', c./.''''..... .i.. • (iL..-,-'"'',:.7..3-'
9 • ''" • Z0 r19•
0 ' 200 . 400
T.li -.; F.--.::::2_
_._ .,_,.... . _ ..___
scale
feetr'....."'"•"----..,` _
•-....'-- •:4(f9_ 4o '
" 2641 f
s .0„.•• . . i".vo ,,,_ _______________________________ _
OUT LOT1
,',•''s• • I - , .,, 0.0•••10 c. `n 5P3*4.3'Sr'W
-'•• r ..'
.,,__,...,-"'',; :.. -,.....•Ac_2.8. c'i 75,, 7!.,o„,, 9/..i/. 9.3.57..''.„1:-,:c........:2.1.:2,,•7,,.., if;1i, ....;, 102.8 60, :2,,..o: c?':-.,.,F,.7,3,?„ ,,,,,....,f.. ,.„,:: ,,,,, ,,?...,,,,,i
. .
- ..0 ', ..'-.: ..: Cv ..?(8 1,-. .,,,y s,,,.,,-,-!,+:.-''-,,,,,i..: %•-•'., z.., ,;)0,,,,z 9,,o ,,,
.,.. '•::.-------- 1 .1:1 ,,...,, 2 -..*.„.,,,:'',,',;1,•,• ',.:„':,'".,,,,;'' 0-'• ' , Pori of 0820) '
•,:::,--1'1''''
„..ci-s----
r.-1 i_L" 1°`.._._2. S:....1;. ..1....7.,p;..-...,,,,.---7-;42.1.,.A..... ...-s,...•(:- .- •
;•.:1.-: :::;......7-1":;. ':•;...'1,z/H71:9;le....'
4
...„.,.., ,... „._.. . .
, .,_,_,...,_ , 74 43 5 :71.,r,,,,,,,, 3.,..•s., , , , 4 ip ,,,,, a, 0.9„
e \•'-
..i / . V, . I. n'-^ '', 2:1,.-..13.39 '.... ''-CO ' 9 ...i' `•'',.„ ',ix. •'`,5-*v":".,,,,1'1'`/,,,'''''''.9,',7
''. •\ 1' 1•;,-'`::: 2 4* it.1 i..---.11."1_7 3 ''', ;,::!%:' ej.". .,'''' ''' " 0 it, ;.• t0:" 9 6,° °
'7',.•'-.... ,'",-- ,;., ,. ',', 4.) a 9,,,:'PLi'L..,:.\1_,-:..'5'a, tf,i^' I 'r,i .9 ,17,../''z.0 74)- ;l''.!as,:.`' ''''';-
il 4,, 11: r.. . i,o vii ,.., (/) '"-''" 2 "...,c''',..`", ''' , ' -'''''- •...''&'. ' ''s' / ' 7 'i : '' n' Ct a .5'.:•••:,0 e c-\„:ot 9 F. / 4^.1',i,,"/04,1;‘.10 ,...'. .„..°•,•.,.. ..'ranis a r-r,so- StV31131'.9
''A'..".''''''`'•_:---;<''' I;.-1=,..`1, 3 &'',7?--' -:-i',---, ii'.'..s;a1`' ,,,,(Z "1"8..3/4' r`,,, Vo /::, '`,;-'1_,,,,p, ''' ' 4".
',;;;----' '1.-:n I". .-'it' 24",r,s ,o .!‘,;,' -, ' -.., 1.,':-' %.°-,_s'7,,r- . ''9:‘L,:' -.4.Z: - ,,".'-',..--Z--s-ir--4--"-2f-. --- 'fr•
,:;!..__•tr,t..t..!.l :','1-;..'.4',4;\ ',.:`\`::'„‘, ‘;.." I ,..c' ,;‘'. IC) ..,3,,, 4. .,,;.;''''-'-4,s '; ii .."•,'s, v•:.) ,iii•",;:s ',J.... .,, ' 7 ,. :' ::..... ,
t` 7r . r,.-'''''' 4 '''''''''''''''''-\'4,':;' „, --2-9--.11:' ''Z 7 , '''''',2s-p,',-;-,7 01'.'1:'''•;',,`!,•!.`,,,: "''''."',1,1,1, .c.ii, I'.•., :. i
-, ; . !..'+' 'IX_ /6 5 r''\1,/ ::.5.t.,, _4j ;-,-..i-Grti-i-`` -i-s 0 "4---2';''''Oc;.;' 6.1%.1•'1. .'7,1(2--'y, ,
•11, r i '-',':, ! :-' (: ),'" ,"? rf:A,..,ivi:.,___,:.,'„,,..;;,)•:;, ;:. :J:,:--',..,.ci6, s.,,_,==_1_i2 3_•!--.: _,--...c:, .d,sf.i..lit:',,,l/'%:::;'\ R 0 '''''!N pi/ZoP.I.3c3.-3 i-f 711: 7-t
: • ,,i_,—.........-..Z..--.`a,.,,,,f .,:.:___,..2,1. 3,0;761,90 Nalr3f.Jr/. .... ll 7:c,i.!:,,,,,,.:::',.:‘,..::---...•!.1. ... --I:" ,_Fzi‘,1:::7:,.... ...-0...... tif:„1:,......:, ----'-...ic:94.....,....:e19(...‘,40.ts r 4,
.1-,t.., ...._300 ____ ; 10 .1 n___._L". „:„.__i_i_isT ,,2,.. .:1_,.1...,..,j,,,,,t'Z
. Hint) .i.
c o .,"4'
` .' n J. . . '74 ,
134- s2ti *4'Oc",‘''ils-,r,:,
- ...°°1-'1\11‘2, ''''''','s:•.17,3\ 4 C;c, 5.s: l'," 4 n5ifri.S\n.''' 1.;14, PO:2, rf--t"..:4''''
,...:).:i2.•••;•_,,.."''-'''-'1"::-. -L-'n.i..",''''' l(S074) `''.••• .-; C el, -; ' .7: 14' :V 15 1:,\, 16 4 a ,.,,oi, ZEI i...-11 1• -1
n . aca) 3 . -ln •'
POr317'39E. .\ ::I ."." .':" ' '''
90 oa\ RO 99 / 190 " - . '.
....
is....,o • • \
65 /05.i!3 IIO2 ioEIS ss ---. I
,f, r., 4) 7 1•- 9 \'''' •
-7-..-. •-,:,^ 0:-.
- ft : .:-., 'a's, `,°4 6 .•'• \-0' %.-. •44.d g q •4 iu .-
•C Y. a": 47
•,,,,/6 ‘.,,,'5 ‘.',,,',,,--". Cr:''''&°Cp__.'"...3 C',e'!..4'-- - !0'9.T9/ A,,,,.. -.5..
v ,. ,80 6 0/ ;:,,,,„'CI,.;',...,‘ .,,.25D -i',..,p 9 gef --...,,y,,,,,,„ ,,, 'IA 70 IOC •,...2±'? o.c.2....,,,,,Q, r,i,„.
, ••
--7.•."---.,L-.,, :.f..-.:,..‘
30o. _'. ••.;.-,.-.,e;-,:.-,A.'(,:",.t,•!--.;,;,.,;...„,-.,.,1..••,ia1l1
l:.:1•. -i,,r.,44-7
1(m.5
'4-.-;;-c•.1.3i.01fa.i,E.-_,,.1.".:-.z,,,.."-';-v..i.,,.,
,....
70.-,, • ...z.z.., ....,c f'..'s $(...„,:,
.• 35
1
cm s., 'II • •-• ,.:.., ''''-'.., .4%
''`,k, :i. "",-,N,...6•,-,'' ;..-:" '1.,,!:„9.5:ni s's .21 ..va 2..„,‘‘A,-.0.).‘- CS.‘-."' 9.,'''' .,*i 6.4
,,p5/7,Ar.•!- '...•: ., (6/(,)M ' .q'',/,``''''',...., . t...' /;/''''''c., n•,i• ,-,,,-<21 \ le z;:',? (".." 4.'_b.f-".
, , "<..1 ,;1
4, 71i,•f j ,-;,.
1
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: August 12, 1977
SUBJET: Federal Aid Urban Program
Submittal of 1978-180 Projects
We have been notified by the Transportation Advisory Board of the Metro-
politan Council that applications are due by September 6, 1977, for FAU
projects for the 3978-80 period. Unless otherwise directed by the Council,
we will request Fall funding for Schooner Boulevard and also a trailway
project along Co. Rd. 1 from Co. Rd. 4 to T.H. 169.
It is recommended that the Council, by motion, recieve and file this memo.
CJJ:kh
' I
.
II1
1 1,
Aug. 16, 1977
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
}
RESOLUTION NO. 77-115
RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE
ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF 1977 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS
AND SETTING HEARING DATE
WHERCAS, contracts have been let for the following listed improve-
ments, and the total project cost, including expenses indurred or to be incurred
and the City's share, exclusive of that assignable to City property, are
established as follows
AMOUNT
TOTAL CITY TO BE
PROJECT COST ($) FUNDS ($) ASSESSED ($)
'(See attached Exhibit A)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed are
hereby declared to be those as set forth above.
2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer
shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be assessed for
each improvement against every assessable lot, piece or
parcel of land within the district affected without regard
to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a
copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public
•
inspection.
3. A hearing shall be held on the 20th day of September, 1977, in
the City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assess-
ments and at such time and place all persons owning property•
affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity
to be heard with reference to such assessments.
4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessments to be published once in the
official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing.
He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner
of record of each parcel described in the assessment roll not
less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk '0 f
Exhibit A
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
AMOUNT
TOTAL CITY TO BE
PROJECT COST FUNDS ASSESSED
:1. I.C. 51-266
T.H. 169 Improvements
from I-494 to 1/4 mile
south of Schooner Blvd. 1111�
2_ I.C. 51-282
— i
Preserve Blvd. Street 214,955.32
improvement from
Anderson Lakes Pkwy.
to Schooner Blvd.
3. IC. 51-283
Sewer and water 30,886.59
for New Testament
Church
4. I.C. 51-284
W. 78th St. extension 64,950.07
of sewer and water
5. I.C. 51-2a;
Utility and stint 832,011.58 143,060.00 688,951.58
improvements in
Mitchell Lake POD
6. I.C. 51-290
Sewer and water on 89,073.18
Heritage Rd. north
of T.H. 5
7. I.0 51-291 •
Street improvement 13,119.17
on Birch Island Rd.
south of Co. Rd. 67
8. I.C. 51-292
Street improvements 133,096.93
in Westgate East
Addition
9. S.C. 51-293
Street improvement on
Eden Prairie Road
south of County Rd. 1
611/J
- 2 -
10. I.C. 51-294
Utility and street 32,066.33
improvements in
Forest Knolls 2nd Add.
11. IX. 51-295
Water service to
Modern Tire Cu.
12. I.C. 51-299
Utility and street 310,632.50
improvements in
Stewart Highlands
13. I.C. 51-305
yy4
Bituminous paving on 1,812.98
Riley Lake Road
14. I.C. 51-260
Re-assessment of
Schooner Blvd. storm
sewer. Assessment
levied in 1974.
15. 1.977 Supplemental Assessments
Trunks
Sec. 6 4450 520.00
Sec. 14 6250 18,232.50
Sec. 22 3058 730.00
Sec. 25 5610 17,222.70
7610 10,935.50
8420 37,026
56883 0500 1,034.00
1000 1,034.00 •
1500 1,034.00
•
r;((i
- 3 -
Later..3_
Sec. 1 6235 2,125 sewer only
7260 2,830 sewer only
7421 1,150 water only
Sec. 6 3842 4,365 water and sewer
4450 3,275 water and sewer
Sec. 8 0884 1,150 water only
Sec. 12 4750 4,365 water and sewer
Sec. 13 5510 1,150 water only
Sec. 15 2500 1,150 water only
Sec. 22 3058 1,535 water only
Sec. 26 9800 1,150 water only
56883 0500 1,365 water and sewer
56856 8000 1,535 water only
5702 6750 1,535 water only
53^?8 4250 4,365 water and sewer
4375 4,365 water and sewer
4500 4,365 water and sewer
6125 4,365 water and sewer
7750 4,365 water and sewer
8500 4,365 water and sewer
SAC C)tARCF:S
57014 4300 325.00
CUL-DE-£AC FORK
Sed. 16 6250
WEED WORK
56715 4530 36.00 (1 yr 0 88 int.)
TRUNK DITER14CNTS
Sec. 2 2010 715.80
2030 32,612-80
Sec. 3 0400 78,353.00
4810 654.50
4820 18,269.90
5000 483.16
- 4
Soc. 5 1420 19,541.50
2210 715.80
2220 715.80
2260 715.80
2400 27,021.50
2621 715.80
2637 715.80
3000 8,882.50
3220 31,060.70
3430 3,366.00
3440 26,180.00
4750 84,692.30
5801 2,614.40
6430 18,700.00
Sec. 6 2100 116,519.70
2225 60,101.80
2800 2,281.40
3000 14,847.80
3838 40,728.60
4025 10,715.10
4219 15,184.40
4600 22,757.90
4830 46,525.60
4840 17,877.20
4850 46,488.20
5210 8,845.10
5600 467.50
5812 5,604.80
Sec. 8 2135 715.80
2415 715.80
2610 21,804.20
2830 27,750.80
Sec. 9 0415 2,449.70
4400 70,517.70
Sec. 10 0504 3,740.00
0508 108,946.20
1510 2,487.10
1530 76,651.30
2050 2,992.00
2085 11,182.60
2527 8,508.50
3015 45,104.40
6500 1,431.60
7000 2,863.20
Sec. 11 1516 17,746.30
1540 5,853.10
3540 . 3,440.80
4010 104.009.40
5
Sec. 12 4750 46,937.00
Sec. 13 1000 52,902.30
1500 30,275.30
2000 89,030.70
5565 6,937.70
5600 7,461.30
5625 5,142.50
5650 23,730.30
Sec. 14 0500 7,816.60
5000 4,544.10
1
5200 27,096.30
5610 2,431.00
5625 49,199.70
5800 15,876.30
6025 30,107.00
7149 47,311.00
7260 47,647.60
7270 1,907.30 •
7465 49,368.00
7610 38,896.00
8197 15,053.80
Sec. 15 • 0520 15,408.80
2000 29,751.70
2500 45,590.60
3000 22,814.00
3500 35,922.70
Sec. 16 0470 16,212.90
5680 48,750.90
6525 84,692.30
Sec. 17 0816 715.80
2415 3,927.00
2425 31,247.70
2435 1,870.00
Sec. 22 3590 158,370.30
Sec. 23 3570 81,435.00 1
3575 1,439.90
3590 3,852.20
6020 37,082.10
9030 34,227.10
Sec. 24 1610 6,077.50
1800 39,438.30
2182 61,092.90
/01I
6 -
Sec. 26 0400 63,954,00
0810 .51,873.80
6810 89,591.70
56742 5421 7,199.50
56825 5600 8,602.00
6300 6,526.30
• 56842 9000 16,381.20
56845 4500 4,862.00
7200 23,692.90
56851 4500 5,797.00
9000 24,553.10
56856 3800 715.80
56915 1350 715.80
56977 7500 445.50
56978 4010 8,489.50
56992 4000 28,629.70 •
8000 55,127.60
56993 2100 4,688.46
8100 13,258.30
57004 5000 126,299.80
57027 0250 715.80
0500
0750
2000 "
6750
57028 1000
1500
1625
1750 41
1875
2000
2125
2250
4250
4375
4500
6125
7375
7500
7625
7750
7875
8125 "
8250
8500
flju
• - 7 -
LATERAL DEFERMENTS
Sec. 5 1420 3,822.26
1420 15,287.75 •
3440 20,383.67
Sec. 6 3838 5,095.92
3838 3,822,63
4016 45,863.26 •
Sec. 10 4500 3,367.00
6500 6,733.99
7000 2,525.93
7000 10,100.99
56978 4010 5,095.92
56856 3800 3,829.51
56915 1350 4,136.48
57027 0250 3,367.00
0500
0750
2000
57028 1500
1625
1750
1875
2000
2125
2250
7375
7500
7625
8125
/) , 'I
•
MEMO
TO: Mayer Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Mane.gez
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: August 12, 1977
SUBJECT: Lake Eden North 2nd Add.
Acceptance of Sewer and water
Westwood Planning and Engineering Co. in a letter dated June 1, 1977,
has certified that the construction of municipal sanitary sewer watermain
and storm sewer has been completed for the Lake Eden North 2nd Addition
(location map drawing attached), in accordance with City approved plans
and specifications. The City Engineering staff has made a final inspec-
tion of these utilities and it is recommended that the City:Council accept
for continuous ownership and maintenance the sanitary sewer watermain
and storm sewer in the Lake Eden North 2nd Addition, subject to a two
year maintenance bond commencing August 16, 1977.
CJJ:kh
Attachments
WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY
1
June 1, 1977
•
City of.Eden Prairie
8950 County Road 4
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Attention: Mr. Carl Jullie, P.E. •
Director of Public Works
Re: Lake Eden North--Plat 2
Utility Construction
Gentlemen:
The construction of sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain has
been completed for Lake Eden North Plot 2, far The Dietrich
Company.
This tettcr is to certify that +he construction of the sanitary
sewers, storm sewers and watermoin .for Lake Eden North Piat 2
was done in nccorc'once with plans and specifications approved
by Eden Prairie.
Record drawings ore -being_prepared and will be forwarded to the
City in the very near future.
We respectfully request that Eden Prairie accept these facilities
for continued maintenance.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me.
Sincerely,
WESTWOOD PLANNING& ENGINEERING COMPANY
Francis D. Hagen, Sr., .E.
FDH:ss
smIL 202.7415 NAY}AIA 6111l1Y\HD.MINNLAP005,MINM.507A 55426(612)5460155
i
' _.,�� 41®2 Ifi 1®1,.d4r
•
i't.atwtlul l
• I ° . _ S6irii6'S31 Y- St!WI it •
' . , ' "..... Ss®C114 ' SC.'Wei
,g
141
� �„ 9` 1 ' +�a . �F 1 r_;. N'____••.p712.97 G S 1974....
' 574.41 ._1 •
Bog- _
�, wi
o^ �e
.o h •
• h'ti90353"E . 2 vj 4 m'
3?6$I 25787 . ?/ s
TI40; - 220. . .."-I ` _ O •
2• 6E -,, EAST 01 01 /�. It 7
• • w
y 761 s o 255_30. a 49 .,5. V3:. ov.s..
: v g7`f_ '` Zp6 Q3 ',ram � or •I• ),
�� 13 Try _ • - h 9
°"� IgHia: . •50 o R:447 64 . • ~' pe5Dol.- �c ) r
to q .• p T Y .� ,h �\
^ Q; N123 w . U s ♦ c
o� ,t'. a,• 263.78 In ,r'1 • °o s tar �+ .to � �h
'I'^'". `1) d 7 S� 4: ,RE 6. 1171b f• °e, B c *w. ?' 6+ r .+ •
CiQ� ..:,..,• �K�oC �`/S ',or 8�3^tl�l • 0 `-2, 2•..,," Y�.L .`„. -
T " o e
•
d T 2Z545°O c- • 183 40 . •y''>�,,0 4414- 't' 00
J 2 ,i, � - — PI TA "4'4/ '3 ds3 \ •
S'js.� 298 4,. -IC42P Oj i..•S NI. 0 4.05/t-O •. P .a 4 ,70
op r
Z ss,"iet j y06ti', 1,�Oek\d w,S Et543 R3ro• o,
•✓ l
ti • SEA..'�-i: 0 Y in'''. IAaw: _./fig
t J.^sA1/0 R� a 588315Z!
. ^ �: 338/SE 0° 95 •i i 76.5o,_ i ,
•
983_i) sOvrH`.. IOSF9,..... 14697 - 79,. 'rf+",lc„,
�{c,23y28� lo9�f p'�
I 1091756 E' a y µ'j,C 1,140
I q 69s:3s 14niD�2:Qw L4 k s —ec �.-' 2,,,
5868'- ti/• . PAZ R4vSy 6 7.0
LI `- N89.27'S6 f 0�17 d:/6^G 69 �w4 dS F +'.
•0, . -- D is '.z.M1 e,
•
August 16, 1977
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-114
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
OF HIPPS MITCHELL HEIGHTS THIRD ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Hipps Mitchell Heights Third Addition has been
submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie
Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all
proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City,plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Hipps Mitchell Heights Third Addition
is approved upon compliance with the recommendations of the
City Engineer's Report on this plat dated August 12, 1977.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a ce'-tified
copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of
Deeds andior Registrar of Titles for their use as required
by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above rimed plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
• Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penmel and Members of the City Council
THRONG;;: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DAPS: August 12, 1977
SUBJECT: Hipp's Mitchell Heights Third Addition
PROPOSAL: The Developer, Richare E. Hipp, is requesting City Council approval
of the Final Plat of Hipp's Mitchell Heights Third Addition, located
south of Scenic Heights Road, west of Mitchell Road and northeast of Tam-
arack Trail. This is a replat of Outlot A, Hipp's Mitchell Heights and
Outlot E, Hipp's Mitchell Heights Second Addition. The plat consists of
32 lots designed for double units (RM 6.5).
HISTORY: This Hipp's Mitchell Heights POD was approved by the Council on
March 28, 1973, per Resolution #506.
Zoning to RM 6.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on
April 11, 1972, per Ordinance #169.
The Preliminary Plat of Hipp's Mitchell Heights Third Addition was ap-
proved on May 17, 1977, per Resolution #77-71.
The Final Plat now submitted for review conforms with the approved Pre-
liminary Plat.
VARIANCES: No variances from City Ordinances will be allowed.
STREETS AND UTILITIES: Open cutting of Tamarack Traill will be necessary to
provide sewer and water services to abutting lots. Existing utilities will
be extended to serve lots fronting on Mitchell Road and Scenic Heights
Road. All utility extension work will be done by the developer at his
expense.
No public streets will be dedicated through this plat.
Street lighting will be required along Tamarack Trail. The lighting
•
plan will be approved by the City Engineer. Payment for street lighting
will be in accordance with current City Policy.
PAkK DEDICATION: A cash contribution of $6,400 ($200 per lot) will be re-
quired of the Plat, in lieu of land as required through Ordinance #332,
due upon issuance of building permits.
•
,/J ,l
- 2 -
•
Outlot A will be used as a playground and open space area to be owned
and maintained through covenant restrictions to be approved by the
City Attorney. A 6' wide bituminous walkway will be installed along
Tamarack Trail and Mitchell Road. Waldway along Scenic Heights Road will
be installed under the Improvement Contract 51-270 (Scenic Heights Road
Improvement(.
BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit approved by the City Attorney
will be required to cover the cost of insatalling additional sewer and
• water services on Tamarack Trail, sanitary sewer and watermain serving
lots abutting Mitchell Road and Scenic Heights Road, restoration of
Tamarack Trail, and walkway installation. The bond amount shall be
approved by the City Engineer. Costs for the bituminous wear course on •
Tamarack Trail are covered through an existing bond.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Final Plat of Hipp's Mitchell Heights
Third Addition, subject to the requirements of thir report and the
following:
1. Rxecution of the "Developers Agreement."
2, Receipt of fee for City Engineering Services in
the amount of $960.
3. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
4. Receipt of signed petition for street lighting.
CJJ:kh
• 1/(n 1)'
1
1
4
August 3, 1977
TO THE W YOR AND MEMBERS OF THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
RE: RDUND LAKE ESTATES SECOND ADDITION
Attached is a petition signed by residents of Heritage Park 1st Addition and
Round Lake Estates 1st Addition.
There presently exists one egress/ingress to these Additions. The City
Planning Cor;nission on Monday, July 25, 1977 recommended approval for 37
additional single family detached homes for Round Lake Estates Second
Addition. With respect to this, the concerns of the residents are as
follows:
1. The predominant number of residents in the area turn left onto
Highway 5 in the morning because of work location, services, and
cchool. and li :ewise the resident: of the new plat would have the
same turning movements.
2. Because of the semiphores on Highway 5 for traffic control to the
west and east of Heritage Road, it is very difficult to get onto
Highway 5 and at some times, almost impossible.
3. Durino adverse weather conditions Highway 5 is impossible to enter
during peak traffic and difficult and dangerous during non-peak
traffic because of the lower elevation of Heritaoe Road. Because
of the grade of this Highway to the west, it is impossible to
notice a vehicle until it is at the Heritage Road elevation
approximately 75 yards away because of the hill on Highway 5.
4. There are now 40 houses in the area, not including the vacant -
parcels and houses under construction. The proposal is for an
additional 37 homes for the area. It is estimated each single
family home generates 10 trips per day for a total of 400 trips
per day presently with only one access. It is not sound planning
to more than double this vehicle movement given the circumstances
of the present access.
5. What if there is an accident on Highway 5 or Heritage Road and
there is an emergency in the area such as a fire or need of an
ambulance or police assistance. There has to be another access
to the area.
i
Mayor and t1e:ihers of the
Eden Prairie City Council ,
• Page Two
August 3, 1977
6. The design of the access should be so as to discourage traffic
• filtering into the area. Because of heavy traffic and/or the
semiphares on Highway 5, vehicles turning from Highway 5 to go
north on Eden Prairie Road or coming south on Eden Prairie Road
to proceed west on Highway 5 would most likely cut through the area.
The residents support the separate motion by the Planning Commission
in reference to another access and the first motion where it refers
to grading of the proposed plat to be sensitive to the environment
including dust control, trail and a tot lot.
e
IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE RESIDENTS STRONGLY URGE THAT PRIOR TO
THE APPROVAL FOR ANY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IN ROUND LAKE ESTATES
SECOND ADDITION THAT A SECOND INGRESS AND EGRESS DE COMPLETED WITH j
A ROAD DESIGN THAT DDES NOT INVITE THROUGH TRAFFIC.
•
•
' .
DATE MANE ADDkESS
, ,I.
/(i.17 ./L./-17"4-1f777/1,4t,----1------ I 7 9-6c)
./
I
/7)20
0 “-(f
AA/7), --,-/22/ ‘. ( ('-' • . /7-21 Pc._.
/7'2-4) - ,,,./ • it
rY1.., f:,,,E,1,-, 6.,..o./...---- /7"70 Pail-- ei,vvri e.
1
/0/ ell 71/ ,:,^1
, i 7 , i( , ,,/ J., /7,,F4,-0 A-1
I
0 444__, I 7 SO Pd,-/Afr. ei*Ye.A.
--. .--)-5.„
i / /
f,7 1 e,:-
S'''/(,) ,.,,, /1 /4/I; ("7?ii ii ' /...z •t'
/73o0
__ . . o ,, .. li 1- et 4
eAn, 0,1,11/,1 R..21fd oaao Pcwii 6,/icitt
4= 7.1e-rz.e..6.-t / ,<, l 72.e-,a , e, 44- -
---- --- LT'
11.4-11 ALAA al:ela)
•
DA f E W\'IE ADDRESS
/,'.)/•, , •, .1., 1,-.
„ , , , .,_,. ,• - . - i• -,1 ''. . /--, / 7(--,6./ ,f/14 c.,/-L, ZA• •-
____.............
.,:,, , ,
yli2./7. 7 :,--•//(1 4,A..7.jr.2„..Z V....,,,://, f":_,&",/\ ,• 7/^ / ,..,.
......... ........ .............
(/:-. . ,./-/
...1 ,,, - t,
• , .-_,/,-,....
. LP ef
(-)(,2 "4-1 " • )12 -Q"}",—(•,,-...' 7/,II a ILA,' E;,,... 4e.,,-,-,
,/-
,/, - -
/77,,/(. ,_) 7. 76 ./.7,/......t:-..-;, ..-(i_-
„.,,,..
:,,,,2 ( ,,,.(..,, ,// /
74/(-s. a r 4,,•,‘...1-,:-,-_. ./
/ I. ' — ' ': '
____ 2/ - i•
d /l' r
6.-\.'\ C--,1.-.`-:...\\%: ,-s\ ' \..1.-1\ -\\:,\ -,, \-'t\s' •:,.\-T-,,\\\.',
„........._...
7Z,I61 7:(...1.75_'•:,e-t,e.::""7:---, ',//s'.:::,,
-bi-77 i::),.,,,._.,--/..-7.,? „ . ,.
....._.... _
147
7 /2 . „ '--%'77 L- // ,I1
___.....t.L.,.....)._.. ,,,
//' ) (,,A,,..,•117-.,, 'f-3/, ,-.'%,,,.,..,-`'i /75-9/ A-_-Lt?,;,..,4
/ ...
(4 ./1.) ---3///:_;,,i,_)....-1 (71-9 K/, ,. ( ;is ,I.,,,, t_
1.t . t_I
4 , i
•'''', A111,1iL ,.,7
'
, ... ..............._,....74,.... ...,..., ., ,
,--- „,. . /.
i-i' _1 • 7.1 /Th
I 1 7 i ' r. .1 - , q.-/,--., ,-,-1 . (,-()(, 6.-<_--Zt,c(2•K ) 4, to.o..
eic/77 1,/ ,/., ,----<---'77Z/1 7010 '.-//:•,._/••--.-„ (--e.,•-,,..,
1 i
i ( ,i) ha: ,
c , i ',- ' -17t,to (r`t,t?'..,f,..,,
. ,1
Y
-7 ,/ ' 4 ,,,t- i .(. ' , .e. •
,.\
4--,',/,'• '.7,'/.-:------:':::..71. ,,...•::::75,,,,•-' ,,...7.-----, . ,--1„, ..e,,,,..7„,76-,:,-..-27,71ez-i-77.7-;,--74----.'-' •2' y--
.
„yil 1// / 1 i! /21, /I— -•-• ,,,,;?
/, I 1 /' L..‘ rt..<...f L 1: .(Or If L 77e, I i ifvf,,,1 •10.7 I -.;' ."--4'
••::1;:;
DATE NAME ADDRESS
77 yo
g 77 -INA floA• (:, 77(70 te_7(
en /t: 77/o
• 7 7 /1/c„- 7 2()A,
.24117 „4.11_ 61" /4-42/4-1 .4
1-1 72 •/7v?)-. , , , I.
A 7 galvtli 76 6/ e
• t)
1
•
DATE NAME ADDRESS
- qffy(C.('t . I_,,71a.0,-, 9 76() 0.1A11;tp-,\1A)rf 1,)7____..._. (7-...4.....---
OF' 1
/74 or i 4.4.,tr A oe .
—_,........
-/e,-7 7 ).9, :. 1..1, ,_, )-)7./- // .IY,,12 /7, / k,,/„„,, Ap•
// , : ' ,. /7.5 ()
g---10- 1 7 ..._ ''):•)',-,1..t. c_Q(-r,....c....)--
Q.,.1\n . <A: t ol.,- -87/1 nfr,,Ti -
__ _......
. ,
1
. ,
...._
...._
. .
— :
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW
Subdivision - Round Lake Estates 2nd Addition
Legal description - insert "A"
Legal owner - Eliason Builders, Inc.
- S.A. Eliason
- 10306 Colorado Rd., Bloomington; Minnesota
Surveyor - Consulting Engineers Diversified, Inc.
Existing Zoning - PUD R-1 13.5
Total Area 2nd Addition - 14.75 Ac
Total Park area for dedication - 2.32 Ac.
Total number of Lots - 37
Average net size of lots - 14,593 S.F.
Outlots - 1 CI 1700 S.F.
Project statue - Second Addition to an area which received POD concept
approval in 19 by the City of Eden Prairie.
Existing conditions: The existing conditions as shown on the original P.U.D.
submittal, for the overall project, remain unchanged except for the completion
of Round Lake Estates 1st Addition at the south end of the project (East of
Heritage Rd.) ,
Subdivision design features: Remain the same as originally submitted. The
Road Pattern, Park Areas, Utility Lines, and general drainage patterns all
remain unchanged. The only alternation to the approved concept is the
elimination of the small lots along the easterly cul-de-sac south of Round
Lake Boulevard. It is proposed that all development of roads and utilities
be installed per city standards.
61/ .,- 1 -
i
Other information: All lots developed will be for single family detached
dwellings. The water supply will be municipal. Sanitary sewer mains will
be installed and connected to the city trunk in the parkway area on this
property. Drainage will be conveyed-to the Round Lake proper.
•
The park land to be dedicated in this phase of development is to be considered
as part of the overall dedication for the entire area known as Round Lake
Estates.
- 2 -
P cz
/ \1
�+ C Cl C' O / •
I .{.1O CS.-. C C� O
In
4- O 23 C7 0 C VI • G C' C Cl 4,r
U aJ C)4) -4-17
a C C7 =. v-
G V. 0 4-. Cl C C a 4- 0 4) •
•'' G ti O• O 1: U U a-+CO >.4) D •
4- i r.. a C' Cl C N• 4- • >,a > .+
O .C: Li C.) a al v� OMr > a CS
C
aJ L ..I-.)J 4 CV L L L
L S. G 40))C`J -4CC 0 >-r�4-) !0 C/N .•) _) 0 C
C% C).,-I tit' '- 0 r 4-= L :J C.l C 4I' IA 4-. •.ei •
+J in M•.- J-O • r- 4) L G C C CC r-4.) U Cn
C) , .- (n rt) • a 4-)•-r-•l Orb C O C- VI a C) J
CJ .C) :n q)•� C' }.GT)�'i r: C/ - 4V C co :_ L 1.-- -0( L 41
a) CC t) ,-4-
VI 4a
0 CI
U 4s Q C r 4) �
a-) CC V r- .1 C , C".L C L r•
C COO -L^ 0WUCO CO C L CU
•
CUW O .•.F C. J tr. U J J• O C VI 4., "C- U _C 4, C :t C. 47 CC•_I . C.. Ci.:: r- 4) O C G r ✓v " . rcm a 4- re OC.c 0..4 4-a 4-CC) C CI t N Cl IC) 4, 0 4, C i 174s` OO q r•'r V) C 4)r- 4)'0 4) 0'1_ CW C C CJ L • C in -C U . C, L .. ViIU C 4-'C)--0 0 C` • C 4-- U CC. J C. 1 J�n �� C >;t C G' C. C:V1 0 C C us a CC O 4s L )J C)
CI) • 4) n) ,7 .,,_
4 •: r- U C r- U L
r •) 4- coJ C) r 4-, O 4-4-) C) O U. VC Q
. ..A1..) V) 0•,- C] G) • 44, -0-C O r,4.- 4- a O.0 a .1,W ^ NC VI 4- 4 V) ••r7 • OU UV. Q
• 0 N 0.3 C CI u) •• G O"O C) L C-4•-4- G a a 4- U.0 C r� a a O st r - ) O -- U co U
"co
RI
a N 0 0 C 4-4- -)(p ^ U 4- 4. e7 . aIfI Ca)U C C- -C.. 0C• O C44V) C _0 4-, IA >C 4s 2:•- C C J O Cl) )C-- CO 0, a 4- N•,- ) .7 p O 4) 0 .CCn G a -C C-..) .U 4J VCS L :- U.is 1. O M _ C _ C4. CG 4! oa
US. ()is a 3- O C,. 44 Q,-O 4J a o C U• Q _U4 N 'O n tt n •- G C n .U 4-, ( .LP C ,C O is G .O 0 C i r 4) tJ 0-0 a I1 4)C1 U S.- 4- (/) G C.)4-.4 CO L. C` •••-- ') .. )yC > C ) i-
0 0 - co 0
4 ,41 V
4'4C) C VIV V C. C, a U 4 J...N 0.0 C' )-) .1 C C. N N J G J ) C U 4,+ (.1 a L't v C N 4-, .- W4-,'CI a 4-)'O U C • T.a 4, W .0 UI C OG 4/ r N G C C 1-! IA Cl(COO CC a C a C C) C. 4-
CJ
' .. 41 U 1 V7 ! C
4J3 C C./ C. G CI,r CC CD 4_ C 4s • 0
0.0 4)N ..W ..le 0-1.; C fJ-- 1 CC4- U-0 C) 0 C./ S. 0- C .j .-
!` LL C). •c O.) Q., •• ._ ) U--I-I) cc ..
'C
4- Cl,-.'(0 C./) uo L a• 0 C -. C..Cf) 0 CD: U - - V0) CO 1- G 4J ' •U 4) C) C.) CJ V. 5.,a)+' C elr 0,.. 0) C 0) Y C. •• 1Cu4)r�( r-� C. o ' C C C U 4- a 4- U •C-•,---", C.!O v (..-1 aj •4i •- a . 4_ -4- n C •f is r- -.C. O C O C 4:C -
S C4U arna •, a 4) CC L cc,r -0 ca. Cti C) u CC) C - G4 ( 0 - C a-0 : C 4.0 •.-4- O 4- 4-,4 Cl 44 ,0,CD.:J O IX) 0 CJ 4)-.- C
1 . ; 4,•.-4s 49 CD V 4•r O O C 4- 7).-- •n 7. .- O C.J U •r-
}
U
OCO • v .) IL') C•- ) + O Cr) F. al r v C7 - C1- C C C'U in C 1., 4) 1 40 ` OLC C C -41 C V 0_• ) h •,-- O O a 4-, in a O C- a G 4 •.-4)OJ CD C r U V •- CC O 0 UT., 4- _ C_ ) 3 � � _ G -.:(.1 n v U O 4).4, yi
•_ 0 n • ' C V 4) C.4-CT > • a O•C.,n 10 4) 0 t _ OM 3-O C. S. as 0.1 0 OT: aL: C CLZ 4--...1 • v C4. -
r C a 4 +s Ti=. 4-) ' 0 s 0 C7 4)4- U^ -) f3 S.•a
•
,4O�-_CN J ! C L-0CJN~ 4_,,4__4J L C O CO4-r4, •r-L G v C. CCCG
Ov 4. •C- C 4- U 0 U J v ) C sCCoao7 0 4Ji) G o•-. ..c :9 n C. o C S. ac c -. C.
-
C N uiGnJNC.:<.J 0cC/ .) s 4-, G C'.1 ) 7 ) 4-0 4.'
S4r. 4, C. o n c C) '0 Z VI.O C)••- a LJ F-
Lit
.-
O
r-O 04)4) 4- C O'O C C-•
C:N O N
� C' `• f C C U Os .-- O C Cn 4J () COVICC (' Ur
J V _•.-V- C4 �O40)J N 4, CO4JN r•L U•r V•r r 4N..•l 71-`•
� j . ._ •- ^ Gi+ 0 S.-.I 4-4 J= a O s.- C.) Rs O rp 4-, O O+ J C
- a C'` s J`: ('CO_0 C - C
-44
V O Y L U VC 1.- 1CCN C U a W L • a .i a U.--CO CC,44 U O a 4, LC-4- ..(: ] ._ !O . W C S- .0 C .- I'd .• C 4- + .0.CCL - OC,a- 4 4.• . C.) 0 C. G 4-) C., • G C 4- 0 • V) 4J QGl
•
UC
.-.
La_
•
4J'7 J C. = C../4- 4J_. IL C) rO.J O l_ VIO4J 01 4- 0` 1.. 4- S. a C 4-V G v _ 0
•
•
)C .•W i) n L r CO NryO a 0 0• F . W J m4 C N C.I 1) O C- .) C !q'4') G )4- 0"0 0 u V toV S- • _C. 7 is •.-4- L. C 0 r- 4s 4- 4s G 4sL C:4, ._ C + re _ v C44:-: L CI L C) C O C M r; O C 7J C: 4- y .O V) C) Li ~ 0 W4) 4-, 0 C 4 -4) O C), C + , C ) C .. C 4-C.. er•• V
•
..0 .V) V 7 : C: G S- J VI -C. v) a n > (1.,4- C O O' 4.W LO L-.) C)C) CJ.) C) .- -• 0 CI C 0 c C a •-
>, V) C: C) U 4- 4 y `CL NL. U J .0-4 J. 4.- C_ C.
}-.4 . 1 :J S_--,,,.0
L•G L. J 4-.� Cn kJ CC CD :_-. Ja G ,0 Wf L a, 0 U 0.>• a .4 J ..CUOC a o is kJ -,r 0 M.0 a 4-,4,4)..-CUO Cn rJ'O
U M sin v4
4. r C_ O. 4sY 0U a 4-3 U , CC 4- i C74- 7 C G S..0 ,.) .)_C .C S. J) C 4) O O C) 0 G C U C)- 4- ) J ))C"4-C Cu CC -C: V 0 0. 0 .- e-n 4U U )4s CI.C.) CC a 01 U n 0 4s 4-)4) 3-
0
IIA 4-
U 4.1 V)N. CC.-C.4)l') C)•,- 4)4.)4 C C. �C CO•..--+C.: C) >Cl) 0 a L C) in'O In 4-
+ -J.C) C..L Cs N N -] CCC 4-t7 ,0 4- O CCC 4.....-0 _'O•r Cr.L a V)4-CJ O.0 rJ 0tc) CL 0
<•C- O.••-C, U O-.-C) q i- O__4s N n) rt1 L.13 n!0 U 4) GC) G O CJ 4, L T.
L m C. L) C.U
•• (1 4) 4 ()1 4J 4) •4) UGJ 4-, • 4-- C VJ
C) if, es C, a 0/ VI C7 v) C •+) ..) a L)` C
CJ .4:4--4- Cl.'_ :_ el I'... AS
a Col a CO C O Y
V "
J=V H604-4)a,TJNw /1 'l .0 CT 0,rro CL
11C-..CC-,,....r .-.... _ _. ....,..)�C
•
•
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -5- July 11, 1977
1
B. Round Lake Estates 2nd Addition, by Eliason Builders, request
I
to preliminary plat 37 lots for single family development.
The site is zoned C1-13.5 and located north of TH 5 and East of
Heritage Road. A public hearing. {
l
The planner identified the area and stated the request is a replat
of a previous preliminary plat with reduction in the number of lots i
and with larger lot sizes. - The planner informed the commission the
Round Lake approval in 1972 stated that another access should be • I
• provided prior to completion ofthe development..
Mr. Eliason stated the preliminary plat request generally conforms
with the 1972 plat approval. 1
Bearman inquired what the overall density would be. Mr. Eliason j
. replied slightly less than 1.8 units/acre. - {
Lynch asked if the staff would be preparing a report. The planner
. responded the staff is awaiting further material to be submitted by
theproponent as• outlined in the Platting Procedures. j
Mr. Bernhard Stoeber Jr., 7661 Atherton Way, read the following
petition- i
The residents of Eden prairie's Heritage park 1st Addition •
' and Reund Lake Estates hereby officially request that the Planning
•t Cocmisclon's authorization for the development of Round Lake Estates 1iL_` 2n4 Addition be subject to the construction and completion of a 1
second ingress and egreao at the time of plotting of the new addition
End before the building of additional homes in the new existing '
•
1 Beritago Park tot Addition, and Round Lake Estates.
1E- Mr. Stoeber then expressed concern over the traffic safety if addi-
tional lots are built plus the difficulty of emergency vehicles
entering the addition if the only access is blocked. He stated -
another access should be provided before additional homes are built.
Ken Geason, 7621 Atherton Way, stated it is very difficult to get
onto TH S .anytime of the day and extremely dangerous. .
Motion
Bearman_ moved, Redpath seconded, to continue the public hearing to
the July 2Sth meeting and direct the staff to prepare a report with
special consideration given to the traffic problems. Motion carried
unanimously. .
•
' Jib
f
•
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
approved
Monday, July 25, 1977 7:30 PM City Hall
COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sandstrom, Schee, Lynch, Redpath, McCulloch
COMMISSION ABSENT: Retterath , Bearman
STAFF P0i'''' .T: Dicl: Putnam, Jean Johnson
•
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Schee roved, Redpath seconded, to delete the items of OLD BUSINESS, NEW
- BUSINESS AND PLANNER'S REPORT as Mr. Putnam was up late the
-night before for the birth of his first baby. Motion carried unanimously.
II. APPIIOVA! OF THE JUlY 11, 1977 MINUTES
P.4,Motion 4: should read-Motion carried 4:1 .with Bearman voting nay
because of 32% of the lots being under 13,500 square feet.
Motion 5: should rcad-
Rebath moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend approval of the Maple Leaf
Acres Third Addition preliminary plat based on the 7/6/77 plan, as per
the staff report dated June 9, 1977 with lot size variances only, having
the specific coaa.c:rcial use returned at a later date for review. Motion
detested with 2 ayes and 3 nays(Bearman, Sandstrom and R^ttPrath).
Redpath coded, Lynch seconded, to approve the minutes as written and corrected.
Motion carried 3:0:2 with Schee and McCulloch abstaining.
III. HE1IENPS rd-. ORTS
• A. Chairman Sundttrot-none
B. Others-none
IV. REPORTS AND RECOMNE NUATI ONS
A. Round hale Estates 2nd Addition, by Eliason Builders, request to preliminary
plat 37 lots for single family development. The site is zoned R1-13.5 and
located north of TI1 5 and East of Heritage Road. A continued public hearing.
The planner referred the Commission to the staff report dated July 21, 1977 and
the plat information Supplied by the proponent. He reviewed the previous con-
cerns of residents as: traffic volumes, safety and circulation. He then out-
lined alternate access of a north/south connection to West 72nd Street, or an
eastern connection to Luther Way or through the existing park entrance. He
stated the City Engineer has estimated the eastern connection to Luther Way to
cost approximately $22 000(involving purchasing or condcmming 1.5 acres of
Dr. Savaryn's property).
Lynch believed the Luther Way residents would raise objections to such a road
connection,
The planner stated the extension of Luther Way to the west has always been
in City plans and shown in the plat of lark Meadows.
•
approved
Planning; Commission Minutes -2- July 25, 1977
Redpath set:la:sted east bound traffic use Luther Way and returning west bound
traffic would travel on TH 5 and make a right-in at the Heritage Park and Round
Lake Estates entrance.
Mr. Gcasnn 7621 Atherton Way , and Mr. Hoag, 7660 Heritage Road, felt Redpath's
suggestion ass a possit ive solution to the traffic problem.
Mr. LonF:si: m, 17230 Park Circle, stated when he purchased his home he was told an
alternate access would be constructed to Luther Way.
Mr. Mills, 7640 Atherton Way, suggested no new homes be constructed until the
alternate access is constructed.
Lynch inquired how many lots in the project would be under 13,500 square feet.
Mr. Berg, Consulting Engineers, stated S lots are less than 13,500 , 2 of which
are between 13,000-13,500 square feet.
The planner stated the City Engineer and he are recommending that the project be
approved and that the City proceed with an alternate road connection.
Motion 1:
Redpath saved, Lynch seconded, to close the public hearing on the Round Lake
. Estates 2nd Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 2: •
Redpath roved, Lynch secnndcd, to recoyna,erd to the City Council approval of the
preliminary plat of Round Lake Estates 2nd Addition for 37 lots by Eliason
Builders based upon the following:
1. A concrete trail be built along Woodview Lane to channel bicyclists
and pedeat clans to and from Round Lake Park. A trail should also
be built between lots 6,7$8 of woodchips or limestone to allow a
southern access to the northern park area.
2. The developer will construct a tot]ot in the open space area seeking
input from the future homeowners as to where and type.
3. Lot 5, lilock2, frontage to be increased to 45 feet.
4. Grading occur in a sensitive manner especially in the north wooded
areas to preserve the natural integrity of the site.
5. Round Lake Parkway be constructed in tlnear future to give addi-
tional points of access to the project. •
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 3:
Schee moved, Redpath seconded, to recommend the City Council proceed quickly
with the construction of a road from Heritage and Round Lake Additions to
Co. Rd. 4, preferably through Luther Way. Motion carried 4:1 (Lynch voted nay)
Motion 4:
Schee moved, Redpath seconded, to recommend to the City Council that Round Lake
Parkway be constructed quickly to give additional access to this project and
others. Motion carried unanimously. -
•
'�--.., (.
•
•
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant
•THROUGIi: Dick Putnam, PlanningDirector
DATE: July 21, 1977
PROJECT: Round Lake Estates 2nd Addition •
APPLICANT: Eliason Builders
LOCATION: North of TH 5, East of Heritage Park 1st Addition
and West of Round Lake
REQUEST: Preliminary plat approval for 37 lots
•
B A C 1: G 12 0 U N D
•
The PUi) Concept 72-09 for Round Lake Estates was approved in 1972 for 102
single family lots on approximately 48 acres. Rezoning to R1-13.5 for the
entire PUD and preliminary plat approval for Phase I were also requested
and approved at this ti:ne. An open space system of about 10 acres was in-
cluded in the I'UD approval.
The proposed Round Lake Parkway will bound the site on the East. Round Lake
Estates 1st and Heritage 1st are to the south and east and the remainder of
the undeveloped land in the Round Lakes Estates PUP is to the north.
a•is( .aa ///
LOCA71ON • kn-R24 __..n' _.-illy-.i-\ �
Round e•!{, {{ z
MAP - . Lake vuu I FP 1�..
Estates +,i i` 'i 1'' `; ' l
ll N fi. .���.IC�. � ��.
1 V BIG J .. '�.li,�')i_,.
'•". \^.mow e" ..J-r /
fi��n MI-:4 Y'O
8.10 /f 51 to —1- .. • M1'".,. 4.. q-( -
•
e 117111� n JSl'1^a,l- , I{49.1
_ 1 y`
: —
- , w t 19` 1 ^1, t-1.L J1".rn i_-`LS.,:�i51/
F. _fg:\..�;'v _ 5 may/ /�;
•
1.11 1 L t. n i
Il cheil r.Jb 3 .�+H{ ' a
�y 1 I1 NNh \
II 1 f
•d�(i mil ., Y I6':
•' ^�,.'' 11'U1) 11.,J ,// I'YIVIK I
�' run . , j�''
e,
•
Staff Report-Round Lake Estates 2nd -2- July 21, 1977
•
S I TE ANALYSIS
Denr.;t_L
•
.The total area of the proposed plat is 14.75 acres with 37 single family lots
and an overall density of 2.51 units / acre. 2.32 acres will be dedicated
as parkland.
Surrounding Land Ilse •
The site is surrounded by single family residential on the south and east
RI-13.5 and R1-22 respectively. Vacant land is located to the north of the
Pull. Round Lake Park , a regional park, is to the east of the site.
Re lest
The proponent requests preliminary plat approval for 37 lots on 14.75 acres.
The site is already zoned R1-13.3 for single family residential.
There are no variances requested, although a variance allowing for a greater
density will be necessary for approval of the plat as submitted. The maxi-
mum density allowed under Ordinance 135 is 2 units/acre. Round Lake Estates
2nd Addition as submitted has a density of 2.51 units/acre. The average
lot size is 14,593 square feet which is well above the Ordinance requirement.
The following are provisions and setbacks of District R1-13.5, Ord. 135:
maximum lot size 13,500 square feet
front yard setback 30'
side yard
(one side/both) 10'-25'
rear yard setback 20'
Access, Circulation •
The preliminary plat indicates Heritage Way as the only access point to this
project as well as the surrounding residential. This project will add over 300
automobile trips/day coming to and leaving from the intersection of Heritage
Way and 111 5 which is already known to be a dangerous intersection. The
Planning staff feels that other access points must be provided to channel much
of the traffic from this intersection.
Round lake Parkway is to be built,in part,adjacent to this project and simul-
taneous with the grading and construction of the other streets. If this street
•were completed through to provide one and possibly two more access points, it
would yield the needed relief on the TH 5 access. Thepessibility of completing
this roadway through to Co. Rd. 4 or to an east/west street to the north is •
being studied by the City Engineer and a report by him will be ready for •
the Diunday night meeting.
I- �n
•
Staff Report-Round Lake Estates 2nd -3- July 21, 1977
.Pedestrian Circulation
The staff feels that tioodvicw Lane will have enough traffic trips to warrant
a path especially when Round Lake Parkway is completed. This will safely move
pedestrians and bicycles to Round Lake Park where a trail circles the lake.
This trail should he constructed in the-sense of a traditional sidewalk and
be available fee public use.
A path should also be constructed between lots 6-7, and 3,Block 1 , to allow
pedestrian movement to and from the northern park area in the subdivision.
This trail should be constructed of wood chips or limestone in the 10 foot
drainage and utility easement. The other alternative would be to make the
10 foot easement as part of the open space system.
•
k;_� i
. .` .
# 8 i �72
1 - - (:. ) .., .. ... , L.,.-e_A-pot..1.5 1.
[ •
-1 �)
�i i,;�. 1 r t 74'
I\ I FS 1 ` 1 I ,
. I ii I 4\4 '/ 2 y`3 •. \ .i'
Ii 41r S ..I. s C2! I
ht
• IU (•
1,1. 'IIp
1 �
Staff Report-Round Lake Estates 2nd -4-
• .july 21, 1977
•
,cn Space and Cnsh Park Fee
Two small arcs+s , total of 2.32 acres, are being dedicated as part of the open
spthe system approved in original
northern area
is il or
with the exu,ition of pond and will give PathwayaccesstoRoundLakePak'
for the residtnts of this project, Heritage Park and future projects to the
west. The preservation of the woods and the pond are positive elements and add
'to the overall desirability for this single family project.
The parkland on the east side of the plat connects to the open space system
in the first addition and extends a pedestrian corridor to Mitchell Lake.
The developer should consider constructing a totlot in one or both of the
open spaces. The proximity to Round Lake Park does decrease the need for these
totlots but small children crossing the future Round Lake Parkway is the limiting
factor. The staff feels that the proper use of the open spaces will increase
the desirability and saleability of the project._
All lois will be subject to the Cash Park Fee.
Evaluation
Lot 5, Block 2, has a cul-de-sac -frentove of 38 feet which
is unacceptable . These frontages should be widened to at
least 45 ' which is the policy set by the City Engineer.
The most northern lots in the plat extend into the wooded area that is for the
most part to be dedicated as park. Sensitive site construction is imperative
especially in these areas to preserve the forest like character.
The development is consistentand ithsthe
e orginallythe approved
vednPaDgw with
od pthe
rojecxception
of the backyard trailsystem
additional points of access can be made available through the completion of
Round Lake Parkway.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning staff recommends preliminary plat approval based upon the following:
1. A concrete trail be built along lfoodview Lane to channel bicyclists
•
and pedestrians to and from Round Lake Park. A trail should also be
built between lots 6 ,7 88 of wondchips or limestone to allow a
southern access tc; the northern park area. (see figure 2)
2. The developer should consider constructing a totlot in
the open space 3. Lot 5, Block 2, frontage be increased to 45 feet.
4. Grading occur in a sensitive manner especially in the wooded areas to
preserve the natural integrity of the site.
5. Round Lake Parkway he constructed in the near future to give additional
points of access to the project.
Jfl:jmj 60/
•
• '
...14 Am.S4:r•or 4 A
ornin.I Ric: Lr1(1:141_:LI 2;1 DIv1:1S311-11:0 INC. , M.o.,4••••• AO
• :
. '-- ..3 1• ry,
te. %
,..4,.r sr.."914.'ref'-.1
,. r, . .
' pr aciKM/a •.„
,„,r 0.......,.• ,,,,, . 1 1%
C 1 .k.1
twvAr
A.A,
. 1 T• .,%'i,\ .'• ::.1.:::;•f„ • 1.. I
I ;
. .
t
r 1
,...,:::.. :13.:.
P:K. ,,. 0----:v?..,.ir.,.;•••.:,•,...;,,..„.,..t.\
; •
--- •;', ',^r.r•-•,,:---,,,,.. ,-\-1"211.:.'m z, ":01„. '\ . i
`-„,,'.', ,,,56.•,'„ '',.'‘4!".„ .,.
' .:'•/. - ,!". \ - :'..1.":".:1-....::'1.[;:•-'4,::::;:::'1;".\
.:•-• 3 : :-.',', ; 4 -\, ' .. -4-'4"'' ..;s1.)‘*.$""
,',, ,,,;'' •„,..7. ...•:,; ,,1/' ,.4..„'• \.‘11 '''.`4 ' ,'' •-i -- \.\
,, •., .?n ,-.....-:. :•••?,,,•,;,,,. .0...",, .,.z .,,,,,i,,.;,.,,,.,.......„.,;,......,,,,v, .,,i,,. ,z, ,.s ll'i
, ..i.:.,;:4 4,..,:7: '1 •.' ',%!•••••••4', , .•.... ...0 4,.....:- .," -0. 4.
l•
s‘i 1 • 4 .,',..1,,.. -,-- P.i: W. ,......'• ..•• '-.0.::..,;''' ...,1, ..'\
It ..:;.,•''..'44•". '..0 ii' 0 .•,..,,,.,.,•: -. •...1 k; •sIN, ...,.„. i
,. :,, ..,,i,,,..,,;;. .., „ 1 ;i: .. •,-4-_..„,,,,,., !,,14,:. .t i ....., i u - ,,,„ \ n.:•;,,..sp.
1
, I''. i e,l':' '''', !qt.C,. ^: - ';,';.4,5 ".'.!).'.„ ..?,,,, '.,\-`:•"..:- ..'; '1'.,\ .:-j.'.'.4;'g i
- ;',.', ' ;• '.:'.. \l,'.;.: ',. •• . ''.'• ' -:.:.;-,...,. 9 ,.'...,.:::`,. ::. ..•:, •'.-.".• A•Z.N.A.I. i
'..A,,,., /7",..• .••, "•! I •• —• .7••••“..,•,:;!.•.., ,7;..•....%.,:',..•.. •.,, 4 c. •• \ -
I i
-me sr .c,o orn• - • • •
.., • N '"••• • ' •;...!,‘ur-! ''-,''N 1
A.AS,4 4.0A,
I,I 4 6 .,',- . '' -'•'-1;:'.--r''''. i f...!,;•••?'.,,'.:::: ',.,'.,.'''Z-'":-
A.4.1.1...,
•• I I • ,ILK, '''" .b!•"r ::•'•$•:`, • '.7'. ..f. . ,... ..N.,,,
...„ •:.:.;.:;; I
...., •,.F...'..-..,-..-^.-.',.l'.-i•-•.•-,.:,',-;1:,
.... IN I Ai Ai !I.::ai 8 ...:-..... J.,;... ..f.,,,,,,, •''.;.: :,,,,, ',..,, •••,,A..... gs...S At l
• ''.• '• • .!';••.;.. •"‘',••..•..•..12 L.? Y. ,...., . - ..,.„. .„..,$••/ i
,,, .,-,,:•.•:::1:1::.,14', 4,- ^'.•• •.° .,,---v;„-!' -0/4...,,,,.. ,..r.,.... ,
4-: q .
•• - , ..., _...... , ... . ••/..,.,.....• 4k,.. -•,-„.... , .,,c.:• -----——
r,
1-''• ;:;:1'..°0, il• .•''.....1. p',-..4. '.'i.,',..1,..::.••'•••••;—'-'?;t:f.°.:...•;If' .•••••••'''..if,,,c;;•':4-•-•.it•:,,,- • '
N:
',.
- --' .•7€:.. \i!:.:::'''''':::'":1:::1:"--iiI.-':',.1;13-::,'..;.';',-; .'..:.is.;::':-:"-':-..._•:.______';ig;-!.g.?;1-,.*Z-,7r; ••4-
,..• , ..„ .....••••,, :: ,-.!:•••:c••••-••,': '-:_••.;•':. .,•:3•..--;.•,.,--.., ,.. -• -9.•,(,. 'L'-',7-4
,• ..,••,‘,.., .••.••• 3:;,......_ ,..,..4:. -•.,;„.,./.;,:,- -4..,:i.„...`",,,,,r-:• ''t..)., ' 'e,.: '.'.
4 ' ' .b.bc!...?,9•.•r.'.:•.'••=.":1:1%. :,.1-:. .,'• ''•-:-•••. ••;'''',.,'.:: ',- ••• .''.-• i' . .."''''''',
I 'k..-- '
, —P---717-:••• 7, -,'.t; •A.:',4;10 ,,j‘,'''';';cf';7.-,-,'- '.•,:.z.4`;:.".,:;P.2 5
!, :..),..,'' '''' l'• '',..•:0'' %•••:.‘ ,' '', ,..'..(':, AAAA A...r ,.!,) •6- '. ,' •li 3 ..'1.4-4,-, .._';'.. ;•!,,6. Z.:4;:oe'$. •• •••y ,. .--
.zi, •-•,-,--,-, . i.., 1 . ,,: -,:,,:ff.„.,..:v,.,•V• ...:'''..;7'7•-•-:'''i "" ' ..",-,,-..-,-;,...-_. ..4f," •,,,.„„
2- .."••.,' .,''• 14 z'N .,.— •v . x i‘,.',
-,-•,-..--,,s---t--:' -.r.. ``' .,e, ....4 .........P,'•
''''''''s •Z.V....- .,..:_,_...-- (,' .. A.,, ',- ,.:.,..,,if,!,•:;," V‘k--r-.-' -'—: "-.1'k •,-7...f..- 244 L8 '
: t ''','-'r ', '::',V-V-:".di ---,,,,,,,. .,.> ,,,.`, -;:-:•:.,..,. .
• 1., , -,00 ..;•:::,4- ..,.......;-:•••;.•-„.....--7:.--.-,-z..', ,-.!" ' 2- ,";; , ;07-.:..,.-. ;., ,:•'•
;'! I .,.,Z, ;','„,:,,...)... .:?.,:".......,. •,..,>.•::‘,..5.::;.••,....- ..,...,..,,,,,'1.,
A'•,z^ .7,,,a?„,,,,-, i'...v.;:,',', ''. "''''..,,..,.04,''.,1.5. .".1••• ..•:.- ".5:`..;•4)..• i::11 ';'''is'
•!;!‘
t:• ...d 1 . _ . ,....,,, ,r•, ..-'...,.... ..1 0• .-1: ,'..`,="if-,t';.....,,,"• , .-Y,' •': •••,,.-,8 •“ ..1-''.:----------' — •''' L; • PARK ° ".•••
b ,. ...,c , -:.,.„c‘., 4.....,..,,,..,. ^,,k-•••-•„'.., ,;.' 1..P4 %,`"-. ..\,,,,,,.. .% :Z!,:.
1 ,ya• ,•Po ',. ..-`:- ...• -...-----.• ..'!" -:;:i•' '•.-- .. '423 .-"-
V- I I
/.. 1.1:4 AL:',,16'.',,',-•, .!',c.1 . :;'.`,..;:'..""'":.'''''''''.'.... .v.''''4';',`,,. 2 1,,,,`!-\,,,.,....,-, •-. , ,\. &,-..'_,., '' 4
::: : 1 v.,,,,„:03.,,, -,.,, : -r. ,--.:4,....:',,,,..• ”1' 1,.'''' ..;\.t,,.',-,,,J",.22 '.''....., L.,1
• I 1.._,.,5 .,',..,.."..?•;-,.,„il!„-,: -.:'..z :,.." .„7d:.'160-:.'''...'' ' ..‘]".;'..":1-;'°'',t'•tV,'''''',';'", I. '‘:'‘I'''''''..1
‹ ,".'. ;;;:lqz '...."-•:. :2,_ - 2,,, t''',..-1.5-.-,,.-;z-..L. . ..\-, .r.,..;',v';,,,:.!,.;,,'•.1.. 1 1, •,,
I ,t
(:i', ‘. ' n"': ` :4„ ‘ ‘;`.:.,' ..-;...::''';'1".• .1.:t,',N. ''''''''' ..-.','":;'°; 01! ^
..,.., .° „.....,...,•-• •N 6 '•.., ..••...I 4 •• ^ .-L ' 0, 'el
k.3. —,, ' ,‘,..),`.•____-, •'2,.• ,,.,.',,, .0 •,,. .—..r. •... •
I . ‘ rt ', \ c:.:_.7-2—___:_,--,—..,„,---N ,.: , .;,,,7,,,,•_,.,, '..,:_\.%. .,:. ':),‘.2*.1 k'l t '>) .
Iie I A I ..i.....::\,;.......1.. ..5•6 j./P°°•4 ,› ..,,.. ; A•" 4,,. '...., 4 c:. --,..?1:...,...,..., i,
OUT L°T A "tsls.`''.'..,'''..:,'e'C'°7 ..,.'•-!,..e.•'ll 4'.4."`;;;i-ls,'.f-ii
. .....
''''. .4.‘ ' 18 ,r ,i':, •`•:;...,:',.....;•••• o:k ,• . • v,.z ..... ,.
., ‘0,...•—. „ . fi, i
, 4:... t"'....!. „,.....; ,20 . • •.. ... „ .. . „,,,
11- I • A.t.-• wes;'-s• ',": ,1 9-,' - g. .• IV.:fop"ic•••• , •.0" ' .00°4,
,,,,,...•, .-e,-. — I asor?'• .
- .
. . . . -,-•.,.... •
..7 •._.> •-r.- `,.... w25.00'W.
2.S.Of
.•
*A.42 I.• l'A• r , ..
" 11.0.,,zr tv..nr.-.1.r..." „__ ,
4. , , n. .it".....,•r. 4,0 P.:,,a,....'re' 1.4...y.•,..efl 11.11Y Cgpy
,,...„.„.s ,,,..•••• I.qqa-
PEf
)
.. 4••••),VAtIk*20) ‘IA V.5
..''••
••• '...'''''''' '.. •
..,.....---.-----
.....
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-112
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ROUND
•
• LAKE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
BF IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Round Lake Estates
• 2nd Addition dated (not. dated) , a copy of
which is attached hereto and amended as follows:
•
is found to he in conformance with the provisions of
the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and
amendments thereto and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
•
ATTEST: SEAL
•
John D. Franc, Clerk
•
•
1Ii.3,
•
City of Eden Prairie
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
•
CHECKLIST FOR REVIEWING
PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENTS
Date 8/11/77 -L.D. A 77-P-20
1. DEVELOPEENT NAME Round lake Estates 2nd Addition
LOCATION 15 acres located north of Round Lake Estates and
Heritage Park
2. DEVELOPER Eliason PuildezS, Inc.
3. ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/PLANNER Consulting Engineers Diversified, Inc.
4. DOCUMENTS SUP?41TTED FOR REVIEW Preliminary Plat review •
5. PROCESSING SCHEDULE: '
Application received Watershed
7/11/77 & 7/25/77 Planning Commission Human Rights
Park & Recreation 8/16/77City Council
6. PROPOSAL •
6.1 JI POD Approval n Rezoning
6.2 Fro,1 Preliminary Plat
6.3 Present Zoning R1-]3.5
6.4 Proposed Zoning Same
6.5 Previous PUD 8 72-09
6.6 Previous Rezoning Agreement N
- 2 -
•
6.7 Single Family detached'-lots: •
10 less than 13,500 sq. ft. Density
27 13,500 sq. ft. or more Density
•
22,000 sq. ft. or. more Density
37 Total SFD lots Total density 2.51
Multiple Dwelling Units:
• RM 6.5 Acres _ Density
RM 2.5 Acres Density
Total Mult. Units
6.8
_X Owner occupied Rentals
Not indicated in proposal
6.9 Homeowners Association proposed
Outlot A is to he conveyed to and become
6.10 Other uses proposed ——
part of Lot 10, Block 1, Round Lake Estates First Addition
Details of
6.11 Requesting City to provide streets and utilities
cost sharing with other property owners along Heritage Road
for street and utilities to be determined before.final platting
Yes
6.12 Consir;tent with City's Comprehensive Land Use map
7. PROPOSED OL'EN SPACE, TRAILS
AND PARK DEDICATION
7.1 Parcels to be undeveloped as open space Parcels shown on plat
as "park'. Developer is requested to install tot lot (Plan
to he approved by Planning Dept.)
7.2 Trails (Location Trail required
along surface type, ownership)
along proposed Woodview Lane and from "Park" north of Woodview to
Woodview La.
•
•
- 3 -
7.3 School/Park sites None
7.4 Park dedication fee to be consistent with requirements of
Ordinance #332,fees due at time of building permit
8. FROPOSFD STREET SYSTEM
8.1 Check City's Comprehensive Street Plan O.K.
_ 8.2 Access to adjoining properties A road connection to Luther Way
is recommended. Before final platting the staff will prepare
a report on the specifics of this road connection and meet
with the residents on Luther Way and review the proposal with them
8.3 Street R/W and pavements widths Proposed Woodview and Heritage
Road: R/W 60', street width 32'. All other. streets: R/W 50'
street width 2R'. R/W for Round Lake Parkway to also he dedicated •
8.4 Private streets None
8.5 Street grades, sight distances at vertical curves, concrete curb
and gutter Street grades and sight distances O.K. Concrete
curb and gutter required.
•
8.6 Street names Street names conflict with other names in City - —
revision required.
8.7 Parking (Ord. #141) N..A. —
•
8.8 Traffic volume impact on existing streets 300 ADT estimated
. 1
- a -
8.9 Frontages on collector streets Lots 11 and 12, Block 1
A.
front on the proposed Round Lake Parkway but this should
not be a problem because of the anticipated relatively low
volume on this roan.
0:10 Other comments Frontage of Lot 5, Block 2 must be
increased to 45'
•
9. GRADING AND UTILITIES
9.1 Range of cut and fill Grading plan not submitted.'
Required before final platting •
9.2 Gignificant land features La Le preserved Area belwe:eu
proposed Round Lake Parkway and Round Lake
9.3 Drainage ponds None proposed - drainage directed to Round Lake
9.4 Flood plain encroachmentNone I
9.5 Development plan showing proposed grading, storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, watermain, minimum floor elevations, pond levels and
representative soil. borings. Not submitted. Required before
Final Platting
9.6 Skimming and grit control for commercial parking lots N.A.
•
•
• — 5 —
9.7 Sewer and water service to adjoining properties (Refer to 9.11
9.0 Sewage lift stations required None
• 9.9 Landscaping, buffering and lighting plans
•
9.10 Natural gas, underground telephone & electric _
. I
9.11 Other comments Extension by the City of the municipal trunk
sewer system will be necessary to serve site. Recommend project
Proceed and R/W negotiation begin for construction in 1978
10. VARIANCES REQUESTED Standard PUD setback variances have been requested.
Variance from minimum lot size will be necessary also
11. o'nmR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL CITY APPROVAL
X Watershed District DNR
Minn. EQC _Minn. DOT
• I
Henn. Co. Metro Council
Adjoining Community
- 6 —
12.. SPECIAL ASSE1 SMENTS LEVIED AND PENDING _ No assessments levied
at this• time. Trunk assessments will he levied when utilities are
onstalled.
13. OTHER REQUIREMENTS
Environmental Worksheet
Rezoning Agreement •
X _ Developers Agreement (PUD only en Final Plat)
•
•
•
•
i II)
•
August 16, 1977
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-116
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
OF WALNUT ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Walnut Addition has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Tinnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects coni::tent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PF.AIRIE:
A. Plat Approval request for Walnut Addition is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
Report on this plat dated August 11, 1977.
B. 'That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy
of tlO n Resolution in the "ffice of the Register of needs and/or
Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358.
Subd. 3.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the aobve
•
named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzle, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John Franc, Clerk
I
fi
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Engineering Report on Final Plat
TO: Mayor Penzel and Member of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: August 11, 1977
SUBJECT: Walnut Addition
PROPOSAL The Developer, Dirlam Properties, is requesting City Council ap-
proval of the Final Plat of "Walnut Addition." This is a 17 lot single
family residential plat (R1-13.5) located north of Valley View Road
and east of Eden Prairie Road in the north 1/2 of Section 8.
HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved by the City Council on June 14,
1977, per Resolution #77-40.
Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on
June 14, 1977. per Ordinance #77-14.
The Final Plat now submitted for approval conforms with the approved
Prelii:irary Plat.
VARIANCES: No variances from City Ordinances will be allowed.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete
curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing and street signs will be installed
throughout the development in accordance with City standards.
Street lighting will be installed in accordance with current City
policy.
A drainage and utility easement will be provided over the southwesterly
portion of Lot 16.
PARK DEDICATION: In conformance with the requirements•of Ordinance #332, a
cash contribution of $4675 will be required in lieu of land. This dedi-
cation will be required upon issuance of building permits.
BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit approved by the City attor-
ney shall be provided in an amount approved by the City Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Final Plat of "Walnut Addition"
subject to the requirements of this report and the following:
1. Execution of the "Developer's Agreement."
2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering Services in
the amount of $510.
3. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
4. Receipt of signed petition for street lighting.
t
u
1
August 16, 1977 I
i
t
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HEIINEPIN
The, following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
07-23-77 6473 VOID OUT CHECK ( 343.15)
08-01-77 6523 VOID OUT CHECK (36,767.44)
08-01-77 G529 VOID OUT CHECK
08-01-77 6530 MINNESOTA TWINS Tickets for twins game-Paid by fees 186.00
08-03-77 6531 MY PIE Dinner for teen workers-Park & Rec. 77.74
6532 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC Registration and title fee on
SAFETY trailer-Public Works dept. 3.00
6533 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage for utility bills 43.29
6534 HOWARD NEEDLES, TAMMEN &
BERGENDUFF Replaces check il6529 36,767.44
08-08-77 6535 INSTY-PRINTS Services-Public Safety 14.70
08-09-77 6536 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employees withheld and employers 1
ASSN. contribution 8-5 payroll 5,249.73 i
6537 SANDRA WERTS Cash change for playgrounds 30.00
6538 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 8-5 payroll 22.01
6539 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 8-5 payroll 6,110.88
6540 INTERNATIONAL IINNION OF OPERATING
ENGINEERS Dues withheld for August 121.00
6541 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC Registration and title fee for
SAFETY new car 3.25
6542 SOIL TESTING LABORATORY Soil test-Planning dept. 3.00
6543 PETTY CASH Reimburse fund 33.26
08-12-77 6544 ACRO--ADROIT, INC. Office supplies 76.71 I
6545 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment parts-Garage 38.44 i
6546 A&G DRAFTING SERVICE Signs-Liquor stroe 8.00 i
6517 EARL F. ANDERSEN Street signs 763.75
6548 AUGS BURG COLLEGE Guide Plan update 3,000.00
6549 ARTEKA, INC. Trees-Water Plant 91.50
6550 BRAUER & ASSOC. Services-Guide Plan and Scenic Heights
Upgrading 6,700.43
6551 CTS BUSINESS MACHINES Calculator-Water dept. 129.95
6552 CHANHASSEN 0TO PARTS Equipment parts 473.15
6553 COPY EQUIPMENT Supplies-Planning dept. and ammonia
for blue-ray machine 21.62
6554 CHANHASSEiI LAWN & SPORTS Supplies and repairs to chain saw
for Tree Disease program 168.56
6555 KE_NNETHI DRIVDAHL Mileage-Tree Disease program 76.80
6556 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CO. July and August services 10.00
6557 STUART FOX Mileage-Tree Disease program 71.90
6558 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. Supplies-Tree Disease program 10.74
6559 FIRESTONE STORES Tires for trucks and cars 368.26
6560 FAIRFIELD INTERNATIONAL CORP. Cleaner and degreaser-Water dept. 135.20
6561 FRONTIER LUMPI R Materials-Water dept. and Park Maint. 71.87
6562 GUY'S AUTO SUPPLY Repair to alternator 55.71
6563 GENERAL COMIIIUNICATIONS, INC. Radio repairs-Fire dept. 134.90
6564 GRANT BATTERY SALES Three batteries 87.89
r :
•
August 16, 1977
08-12-77 6565 GLIDDEN PAINT Paint for Park maintenance and
beach building repairs 134.26
6566 TARIN HOLASEK Mileage-Tree Disease program 62.70
656/ HOWARD LAWRENCE Condemnation Commission-lioeft 125.00
6568 WILLIAM J. HANLEY Condemnation Commission-Nagengast 1,508.40
6569 MARK IHURD AERIAL SURVEYS Topographic mapping 740.00
6570 HOPKINS DODGE SALES ' Equipment parts 11.33
6571 HOPKINS PIRG. & HTG. Services-Water dept. 191.05
'6572 JOHNSON-RIGLER CO., INC. Blocks-Round Lake beach 10.00
6573 KLEVE HEATING Furnace part 5.00
6574 LAURENCE J. KEEFE Condemnation Commission-Nagengast 1,209.75
6575 KRAEMER'S HARDWARE Supplies-Water Plant, Parks, Trees 216.90
6576 KARULF HARDWARE Supplies-Fire dept. 96.50
6577 KARULF HARDWARE Park Plaint. tools and paint 775.94
6578 LANDCO EQUIEMENT, INC. Truck with aerial basket-Park Maint. 19,119.00
6579 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR Parts for mower-Park Maint. 13.14
6580 MINNEAPOLIS STAR AND TRIBUNE House ads-Park dept. and liquor store
ads 77.10
6581 MUSEA LIGHTING CENTER Light bulbs-Water dept. 75.63 6582 11 M INDUSTRIES, INC. Car wash powder 68.09
6583 W. R. 11CNAUGHTAN Services-Building dept. 128.00
6584 MEDCENTER HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance-August 757.98
6585 MIDI•IEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Asphalt-Street maint. and drainage
control 1,150.94
6586 3Ii PRODUCTS Supplies and repair service to
equipment 146.39
6587 MODERN TIRE COMPANY Equipment parts and repair service 24.56
6583 METRO PRINTING, INC. Newsletter printing 385.00
6589 MIDWEST RECREATIONAL Repair parts for foosball table 2.93
6590 NORTHERN CONTRACTING CO., INC. Repair watermain 1,416.76
6591 N;IRTHIIESTERN BELL Service 391.33
6592 PETTY CASH Reimburse fund 39.89
6593 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance 3,219.02
6594 W. G. PEARSON Blacktop-Street maint. and drainage
control 861.23
6595 DICK PUTNAM July expenses 114.92
6596 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN Equipment parts and oil for lawnmower 6.70
6597 PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING CO. Pop machine 219.70
6598 BECKI QUERNEMOEN Mileage-Water dept. 6.00
6599 QUALITY REFRIGERATION, INC. Repair to air conditioner 49.70
6600 NANCY RILEY Mileage-Iree Disease program 45.60
6601 ROGER RUTT Mileage-Tree Disease program 75.90
6602 RIEKL-CARROLL-PIULLER ASSOC. Services-Mitchell Lake-Peetom, Homeward
Hills Rd. Improvements, Eden View I,
Heritage Rd., ST11 TH/5 Co. Rd. 4,
Forest Knolls 2nd and Stewart
Highlands 14,135.43
6603 DONNA STANLEY July services 112.00
6604 ROGER SlIOKA Mileage-Tree Disease program 30.90
6605 HOWARD E. SHENEHON Condemnation Commission-Nagengast 1,015.00
6606 SOUTHWESTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION Dues 50.00
6607 STARR OFFICE SERVICES, INC. Typewriter ribbons & correct tape 93.00
6608 STATE OF MINNESOTA Services-Schooner Blvd.-494 3,272.91
6609 GORDON SMITH COMPANY Equipment tires, parts and oil 178.09
6610 SHAKOPEE SPORTS CENTER Boart oars and locks-Bryant Lake beach 49.75
r.i }
August 16, 1977
08-12-77 6611 SUBURBAN AUTO ELECTRIC Repair alternator 94.87
6612 TOWN'S EDGE FORD Body repairs on cars $406, and auto
parts $15 421.94
6613 STEPHEN TARGESON Surveying services for Parks 514.5088
661d VAN WATERS & ROGERS Chlorine-Water dept.
6615 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER First aid kit for utility truck 122.77
6616 LORN L. WOLSKY Mileage-Teen activities program 9.60
6617 WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY Employees insurance 599.32
6618 WHOLESALE LIGHTING, INC. - Light bulbs for Water dept. 20.00
6619 WALDOR PUIIP AND EQUIPMENT Repair to pump at lift station-Water dept. 585.52
6620 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY Hydrant
meter and repair:parts for W590.49
6621 CYNDI ANDERSON Refund on swimming lessons 14.00
662? LORI ANONSENI Gymnastics instructions 30.00
6623 DALE REDPATU Art work for summer recreation program 49.00
6624 VOID CHECK 6.15
6625 SARA PALLMEYER Mileage-Teen work program
6626 BARD KNUDSON Stereo set-up for music at Teen center 10.00
00
6627 GRACE PEI•MBERTON Refund on tennis lessons 8.50
6628 CAROL SEVERSON Refund on tennis lessons
6629 DANIEL NORLIlIG Refund on gymnastics 21.00
6630 COLLEEN RYAN Refund on gymnastics 4.50
6631 KENNETH JOHNSON Refund on gymnastics 10.50
6632 QRS CONSTRUCTION, INC. Est. No. 4-Stewart Highlands 42,143.49
6633 NORTHWEST BITUMINOUS, INC. Est. No. 5-Westgate E. addition 2,713.21
6634 G. L. CONTRACTING, INC. Est. No. 3-Heritage Rd. No of TH/5 13,082.87
6635 NOk1HUALE CONSTRUCTION CO. Est. No. 6-Mitchell Lake-Pemtcfl 10,742.78
6636 P.C.I. Est. No. 2-Schooner Blvd.-494 114,419.38
6637 KOKESII Life guard suits and playground 348.15
equipment
6638 O'NEIL AMUSEMENTS Tickets for trip to Como Park-Park & 163.80
Rec. program
TOTAL 263,287.85
y l.' �t
• C3'Pi OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
August 16, 1977
CONTRACTOR Thlt .-re.mi]_y 6 Comm.)
Lang Nelson Assoc. •
Prancer Systems, Inc.
Syring Construction
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family)
L. N. Co:Struct c''
Richard ti1iicue Ruiiders, Inc.
IIRWTM 6 '.ENTT1_':TI C:
Energy Systo-e s, Inc.
7:n:se licenses have been approved by the department head responsible
fury the licensed activity.
/2
teyi,t-e /CA‘
E"necca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk
°> ,I,.