The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 06/21/1977 • :RAKE • EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney ti Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Marty Jessen; Engineer Carl Jullie; and Donna Stanley, Recording Secretary • INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. SWEARING I11 OF PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS RONALD ANDERSON, JOHN CONLEY, AND RICHARD RABENORT IiI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Condor Corporation, request to rezone from Rural to I-2 Park Page 4835 approximately 5 acres for office/warehouse use. The site is located 433' west of nwashington Avenue and 2,100' south of Valley View Road. (Ordinance Mo. 77-83) ' B. Bermel/Smaby Realty, Inc., reouest to rezone from Rural to Office Page 4842 1 approx1natel;1 acre at 8i10 Eden Road. (Ordinance No. 77-84) v a C. Edenvale Ipdustrial Park, Outlot F by Edervale, request to preliminaa Page 4849 plat into 5 lots and rezone from I-General to 1-2 Perk. The site is 7 acres located north of Martin Drive, east of Corporate Way, and west of Commerce Way. (Resolution No. 77-41; Drdinance No. 77-14) Continued from June 14th Council meeting. D. Bituminous Paving on Riley Lake Road..I.C. 51-305. (Resolution No. 77-86)Page 4354 IV. REPORTS OFF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS V. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Appeal of decision of the Board of Appeals & Adjustments by Dennis Page 486D Peterson, Attorney reoresenting resident on Cedar Crest Drive. Communication dated May 11, 1977) VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 2nd Readina of Ordinance No 338, amending Human Rights Ordinance to Page 4872 include Community Based Services Board to assist all supervised residential programs or social rehabilitation programs. • 6 Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,June 21, 1977 VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS (continued) 1� B. Resolution No. 77-85, supporting the immediate construction of Page 4875 U.S. Highway #212. C. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-22, prohibiting noisey parties and unlawful trespasses upon the private lands Of another without first Page 4876 securing written permission for'such use from the owner of said property and establishing a penalty for violation thereof. VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council members 1. Appointment of one member to the Human Rights Commission for a term to expire February 28, 1980 2. Appointment of one member to thPIndystrial Commission for a term to expire February. 28, 1979 3. Appointment of one member to the Building Code Board of Appeals for a tern to expire February 28, 1978 • E. Rengrt of City Manager 1. Tax Delin vent property (Resolution No. 77-76) Page 4878 2. _;unicical Liquor Store lease City Hail expansion plans Page 4885 el. Authorization to advertise for bids for Civil Defense Sirens Page 4886 C. P:eoort of City Attorney 1. Regilation of mini and trail hikes D. Report of Planning Director 1. Sign Ordinance Page 4888 2. Metropolitan System Statement (Resolution No. 77-88) Page 4890 E. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Recommendation from the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission on Cash Park Fee and from City Attorney as to what can be enforced. 2. Recommendation of the Parks. Recreation & Natural Resources Page 4891 Commission for a Water Quality Analysis of Round Laxe 3. Recommendation of the Parks. Recreation & Natural Resources Page 4893 • Commission to a raise 4 neighborhood playground sites: I) franlo/I, 2 lloview, 3) Hidden Fonus, and 4) Red Rock. Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,June 21, 1977 F. Report of City Engineer 1. Consider bids for bituminous paver and roller, I.C. 51-307 Page 4894 2. Receive updated feasibility report for Scenic Heights Road Page 4896 " / . Improvements, 1.C. 51-270.(Resolution No. 77-87) 6. Report of Finance Director ' 1. Proposed settlement of 1971-72 reserve capacity charges for Page 4907 1 the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission 2. Payment of Claims Nos. 5989 - 6080 Page 4910 3. Clerk's License List (Dated June 21, 1977) Page 4913 VIII. NEW BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT. • • • approved Planning Commission -3- May 23, 1977 • 1 C. Condor Corporation, request to rezone from Rural to I-2 Park approximately 5 acres for office/warehouse use. The site is located 433 feet west of Washington Avenue and 2,100 feet south of Valley View Road. Mr. Jim Riley, Condor Corporation., stated the 400 feet fronting onto Washington Avenue is zoned 1-2 Park and they desire having an additional 365 feet zoned I-2 Park so the ess lug buildings can be enlarged tv the west ar.d more parking can be added. tie stated they will be working out detailed grading and utility plans with the Engineering Department. The planner stated the request is consistent with the Smetana Lake Report and the staff is recommending approval contingent upon street right-of-way dedication on the entire north side of the property owned by Condor. Schee remarked the staff report had to make some assumptions because insufficient material was submitted. She believed the staff and Commission should require that all material included in the Draft PUD, Platting and Zoning Procedures be submitted with land development applications. The planner stated the staff does prefer having all the material submitted but the procedures are not yet adopted. Motion: Schee moved, Lynch seconded, to recommend to the C ity Council approval of Condor Corporation's rezoning request from Rural to I-2 Park for office/warehouse use on approximately 5 acres to include the recommendations of the staff report dated May 19, 1977 and to require the grading plans and architectural drawings be sub- mitted and agreeable to staff. Motion carried unanimously. zi jam • ' f • • • approved Planning Commission Minutes -.4- May 9, 1977 C. Condor Rezoning, request to rezone from Rural to I-2 Park approximately 5 acres for office/warehouse use . The site is located 433 feet west of Washington Avenue and 2,100 feet south of Valley View Road. The planner located the site within the Smetana Lake Sector. Mr. Riley, Condor, stated the 400 feet fronting onto Washington Avenue is zoned I-2 Park and they are requesting the area behind the lots be zoned to I-2 Park in order to construct additions. He stated adequate setbacks will be provided for the future road alignment on the north side of the site. • approved Planning Commission Minutes -5- May 9, 1977 Sundstrom inquired how close this site is to the future road alignment. The t^- planner estimated 300 feet. Mr. Helle, 6138 Arctic Way, interjected the dis- tance is 306 feet. Motion: Schee moved, Retterath seconded, to refer the item to staff for a report. Motion carried unanimously. 4g3(o • STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant THROUGH: Dick Putnam, Planning Director DATE: May 19, 1977 APPLICANT: Condor Corporation PROJECT: CONDOR Corporation Industrial Townhouses LOCATION: 5.078 acres located on Washington Avenue South REQUEST: Rezoning to 1-2 Park for office / warehouse use. - REFERENCE . DOCUMENTS: 1. Condor Corporation rezoning information 2. Condor Corporation concept study 4/18/77 3. Condor Corporation rezoning request 9/77 4. Smetana Lake Report Sector Plan SPECIP C Pl. ' 1:EQUi'M',17NTS: Regional Rcistionshivs The area protnsed for rezating to 1-2 Park by Condor Corporation is consistent with the ]968 Cuide Plan ::nd the 1974 Smetana Lake Study. (see Figure 1 and 5-16-77 letter) Existing Land Use G Occuaney Vacant land is located to the west, industrial to the east. Existing Transportation Systems • • According to the Smetana lake Sector Study, West 74th Street is to be constructed between Coudur Corporation's property and the Norseman industrial Park site. A 40 font right-of-way has already been dedicated on Norseman Industrial Park 1st Add. An additional :i0 feet will he required for the 70 foot right-of-way needed. • The north parking lot is 40 feet from the north property line. According to Ordinances 1 5 and III, the side setback is 20 feet and half of this setback in the 1--2 Park District can he utilized as parking. This would allow Condor Corporation to dedicate the north 30 feet as right-of-way for Wont 74th Street. Site Area Analysis; •1. Development Objectives - no information submitted. The staff assumes that the objective i.e to expand the existing facility to accommodate increased production. 2. Site Plan - plan submitted shows building addition, parking and roads. 3. Grading - no information submitted. It is assumed that the site will be graded relatively flat to accommodate the building pad, parking and stormwater runoff. 'I 37 Staff Report-Condor Corporation -2- May 19, 1977 , 4. Utilities - no plan submitted. The utilities will be provided from Washington Avenue through an agreement with the City of Edina. S. Preliminary Architectural Drawings - none submitted. It is assumed that the architectural style will correspond with the existing buildings. 6. Housing or land/building use profile - no information submitted. According to Ord. 135 for the 1-2 Park District, a 0.3 Floor Area Ratio is maximum for a one story building. This building conforms to this ratio. 7. Zoning classification - the proposal meets the provisions of the 1-2 Park District for Ord. 135. 8. Phasing and construction schedule - no information submitted. RECOMMENDATIONS The planning staff recommends approval of rezoning for Condor Corporation from Rural to I-2 Park for the 5.078 acres subject to the following conditions: 1. Provisions of Ord. 135 are followed. . 2. The proponent dedicate the north 30 feet of the property as right-of-way for 74th Street. JEJ:jmj 1114 , 4,..., 4\ ..f.e., \, 1 .,.• .0" 20 I 1.1•,*;.*A .,', re.,..4.1-,:=::-.4.... k ..'" ', / A ;VW(..18.....,..1%;1;,;;;•..c.:':•;;;^......:$- ,,, ! 1.. :—$,•-----11.;19._...--.. ‘;''"4 ,, .,,..,....,.....,,..-• , ,t.1 Pt.ATLI, 4 1 4 i -1., ‘11 • \ 1 q ,16 ‘‘,.;:,„, , `N . t...,.; \..; \ \ k,, i il 1 t #7;.," .-------A.7 \_1,31" • --- \---'[.--1 ih .,--...\ I#.--/ - /• -.' 1A- 1 t„ 1 ''. ti-'1Z••••,, ,;), ,'i L'..„, •,...:-..-....-:-.-,z,-.-;,-,-,.. \ j . . ; kt '•.,1,---__,.: 11. ; t. ..... . . • t,..j.5,,,f-,% 13 ..\,.. ; 6. : . 1.A I:F. `:51"4".r.:'TAN A ...'' ; ,.„_, . Nk‘ ; ••. -- .__V. •ti %,, • i ‘,,,..' ;',:-".":. \*. •„!„, ; 1 \.\ . .. • I .. ..%‘• 't • • t ft '. \•. N....."' .1.'• c-. r,-_. .-.c'"!-:;":•^` l'' .. '...'i. 4`''' ....::'''' ----. ‘*..' 1% ' .10-••; //),..1'" .....\z - .„. 4? ••• pki,./..... .,/,,, ,,k'.** li.!",. I Crf .,`:-,..'": ''--• ''''',`",:::/) i p :-.:',..,, - ft' L.-...) L L-.:-,,, - --/ / . A :-'-.', i) t:11.....-,...,;:......-........•.'....r.,:':,,;",;;.; „,1 , '''.:..•'t 04-'.'I.,\.,"..‘.,...., *, / ; , 21 ' 44 .4.„\i i ti . i1 ' -- ....te. '"I.C:‘.. .. ''''' ''' :/,' . ....-''..;*".fL::...!_. -- -,.....7, v, i . ......,. ...: ,.. ,.. ...„, _.,L.....,. i :.yA.:!...c.);_lot.....,:•••1A,-- •••• '--=:A"....,.. • N a• • •...i.."‘...7..1.,:. '' •.', '' --.' -'1. ../.. ii 'W. r .., ..: i ,,:."• L.;„ .. J -- 04.,..;.. ; ..v 1/ / /... •..-c` c,I.: i ; ,r:/... ';!'. 0,i : f. /' 1! ...-. ••,.....;.'i, . f..`I ''' ' '1 I j';d --:'‘. 4,,.--------i;.--::::::-::-..-:,-... 1.1: ,,t 1 ..f.../3,\"-\,•!\.\-:•... / •:,, t i i / \:•,.: . 1.7 i , 8 ':.----...`f:':!..\:/// 4 ' '':\i1/ : 1 ,/ <.• .4. s ,-ie- . • •. . f . _ —' 11 g4.1 Z.1 .4 t er *. ','''''4 t,..-...;.(,----' ' 70 •• , \---' 44 / ii •ii :• _,•-;;-''.2;'''' i'.• .. . l'(:.: .4 ,........2.----/- I .• r' 1 i ..;•.,•."'''' ';:_ 4-';.-.:-,-..:-.----;-• .4„. t. .$ ..0 ,. 1 1 -; --, •••,,,, 4 ,„.,,,,,,,,,,,,----.....:-. .. .--;-- A .,..;•,;,,,,,,,•:-..., i 6 litr"-,.............................:,,,1, li. 1 .!.,.. ..-;,., /.'4.,.... ....At "11 1, '''''..."...1 I: '; 5'' • . ...,t;:, 4 1 1 / .e.,.rZ,"`..:7,./. . .-- ......*to/ :1*. %......_ /4 • •....` • ...............--,--, i,'.., ,-"..--t—.-0 :." p' 4.... '':•,"... 7-"" '..- . ,':- 1 . . ... "'-,/ / ii '4' .*. ."*•• ' c. '• , ..."' **•-.. '..y 'V ... B, 4. / `:•..1, ".............•. ... ........ ' •. .• 114.,-***,ti 0 . I 1 WAN ... .. ...., I ....;- .„.......:5..:,,.:...‘..7:2:k't.,,,::,' ) P .',t. \ -•,,,..:,-1 •-•'' .*: .I..' .'';'''...,. `f 'ti l' . . • • ... !„„e , I • •• ...',-.• .. •••-... •:'"; ....is,.'',, .''''• .-* ,," ''',..- 1 • -,... E '..........--N... .•••.. --- i t."--"'"1-`....... , 1. ...;', '-'•••••••'' ".:L / -• •••• .. ‘ ,.. •" 4., 1 , '`.“,.. 3 I k ..., I -'''',•.. ''.. .. ( .% ..•.. ` / 2. '.::.•••,/ .''''....!.„„0.:,-.*:.2*-21:.21 .. . . , ., ''... .1:.`"**-- . .., --• '1V y ...-..,, ..,,,,,. ..•...'.;'. \•••:-..,---..--.—.....-- q Z31 001 LIMP CODT DE7- ON May 16, 1977 • Planning Commission City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Rd. Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 • Gentlemen: Regarding further requirements of your zoning ordinance, we are submitting the following information with regard to our application for rezoning the West 375 feet of cur property located at 7450 Washington Avenue South: 1. Ownership The property is presently owned by our Corporation -and has been for the past four years.. 2. Developer We are also the developer and builder of the property and plan to extend the present buildings onto the property in questions. 3. Fiscal, Economic We have the financing arranged for the proposed buildings. 4. Developmient Method We anticipate immediate construction of both buildings upon completion of rezoning. We would retain ownership in the buildings and lease them out to the same type of tenants as in the existing buildings. 5. Identify Boundaries and boundary conditions. 6. Identify Project Area and other Major Ownerships The land is located on the West side of Washington Avenue on the boundary between Edina and Eden Prairie. It is bounded on the South by similar office/warehouses which were constructed by Mork Construction approximately one and one-half years ago. To the Northwest is property owned by Mr.Helle. The entire area has been acknowledged to be light industrial. The soil is all sand and gravel and the property would be graded so it would be in compliance and compatibility witn surrounding areas. 7411.w..Ming.oa wennr.rd.a pr.lrlu,niaar.al..)))4)•944.3466 .r..ua y7yv L :J • Page Two (2) Planning Commission May 16, 1977 7. Regional Relationships The entire area is developed with similar uses and past zoning studies would indicated that the majority of the land in the entire area will be used for a similar purpose. 8. Existing_Land Use and Occupancy The existing land is zoned Rural and is unoccupied. 9. Exisiting Transportation Systems There is good traffic flow in the area for automobiles and truck traffic and the proposed up- grading of Valley View Road should only enhance this situation. 10. Existing Zonings The land and the proposed property is zoned both industrial and rural. The Rural portion is presently being mined for the sand and gravel in it and I1r. Helle has proposed a rezoning of a portion of his land to industrial and, I believe, his plans for the balance of his land is for industrial at a future date. 11. City Guide Plan Framework As stated previously, the guide plan for the City indicates that all the land and subject property will be industrial. 12. Critical Public Decisions Utilities are available to the property from the existing buildings. The sewer and water were designed in the first buildings so they could be extended to the property additions. I have included herewith copies of our brochure for the existing buildings showing lay out which will he continued on the additional buildings. Very truly yours, CONDORIORPORATIO I ��% .James R. Ril y %President JRR:jmb enc q ql • approved , Planning Commission -2- May 23, 1977 • B. Bermel/Smaby Rezoning', request for rezoning from Rural to Office for approximately 1 acre at 8110 Eden Road. • The planner located the 1 acre sitewithin the Major Center Area which has been conceptually approved for commercial/office uses in the MCA Report. He stated the staff is recommending approval of the request. Mr. Bermel, Executive Vice President of Bermel Smaby, outlined the site's rela- tionship with adjoining properties through overlays and slides. He stated they intend'to fill the southern 1 of the site ( maximum of 18' fill),relocate the driveway further south, provide parking for 18 cars and landscape the parking lot and building. He informed the Commission they desire a "V"shaped sign }} approximately 80square-feet in size with exposure to US 169,(material not submitted). • ' l Redpath inquired if the City had transitional use procedures or an ordinance by which to review the request, or if the only option is to "spot" zone 1 acre. The planner stated agreements have been entered into between the City and proponent in similar cases without zoning approval granted. The planner added that the 'staff believes office use on this site appears to be a legitimate long-term use. Lynch inquired if the house to the north was vacant. Mr. Bermel stated the house is occupied and he has personally spoken to the residents relative to their plans. Schee asked what uses Bermel/Smaby foresees for their remaining acreage. Bermel stated he is unsure at this point in time. Lynch asked if a fast food use could locate on a 1 acre office site. The planner replied negative. - . Sundstrom asked if the council is reviewing a transitional ordinance. The planner i replied such an ordinance would be difficult to formulate prior to the Guide Plan update and hopefully will be completed along with the update. Schee asked if the planning staff feels a staff report is required on the request. The planner stated he believes the Commission can act upon the submitted material as it is straight forward. Lynch felt the zoning of 1 acre at a time can result in negative encroachments to existing single family . He would prefer an agreement with a time limit . Mr. Bermel replied that the residents along Eden Road have been aware of the future ( higher use of their properties since 1970. He did not feel this office zoning would diminish the value of the other homes. • Motion: Schee moved, Retterathi seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the Bermel/Smaby rezoning request for 1 acre at 8110 Eden Road from Rural to Office contingent upon the Bermel/Smaby letter of S/23/77 and the 2 attached Barton- Aschman plans. • Discussion: Bermel asked if the Commission is including approval of their signage request. Schee replied negative. Redpathempathtically requested the Council to proceed on adopting a Transition Ordinance. • Vote: Motion carried 4:1 with Lynch voting nay because he believed it would be spot zoning and not in the best interest of the residential neighbors. (4.,µz • • • • approved • 'Planning Commission Minutes -4- May 9, 1977 B. Bermel Smaby Realty Inc., request to rezone from Rural to Office approximately 1 acre at 8110 Eden'Road. The planner stated the 1 acre property being requested for rezoning is presently a single family home and detailed plans would be submitted prior to the next meeting. Mr. Bruce Bermel stated they are requesting utiliziation of the site for an office for 3-6 years, they intend to paint the structure, provide 12-14 parking �. spaces and landscape the site. He stated in the future they plan to move the - structure end construct a new building. Lynch inquired if notices to adjoining properties had been mailed. The planning staff responded affirmative. Mr. Bermel stated he has also personally contacted • some of the owners. Motion: McCulloch moved, Bearman seconded, to refer the item to the staff for a report. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Sundstrom suggested the staff investigate the avenue of an agreement vs. spot zoning for this request. • • • 013 • • • • w ai, • BmW;J1 KWY 'May 23, 1977 . :City of Eden Prairie Dick Putnam, City Planner 8950 Eden Prairie Road • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 • Dear Mr. Putnam: The purpose of this letter is to comply with the submission requirements Of the City of Eden Prairie on re-zoning our property at 8110 Eden Road, formerly known as the Bensch property. We have met with you and discussed our request and have filed the appli- cation form and fee with the city. We have discussed the re-zoni,nq with same, but not all of the neighbors, including Mr. Richard Yosmek immediately to the north at 8108 Eden Road. I believe our plans are generally known by all the neighbors and that they have all received noti- fication by the city. Our request is to re-zone the property from rural to office. The subject property is owned by Bermel-Smaby Realty, Inc.. The property consists of a single family home, setting on approximately one acre of land. Bermel-Smaby also owns and has owned for the past 20 years, the adjacent 80 acres to the west of the subject property and just north of the 20 acre commercial property owned by the Preserve. Other major ownerships in the area include the Sears Homart Center across #169 immediately to the east, the 36 acre Teman property to the northwest and the 8 acre Temon property to the northeast, and the 3 acre Ball prop- erty to the northeast. The Frank Pobuda property immediately east.of the subject is currently for sale. • It is our desire to convert the existing 1,200 square foot home into a small Eden Prairie real estate office for Bermel-Smaby Realty, Inc.. 9910 WEST BOTH STREET,FOINA,MINNESOTA 65424 927.7049 . yg�y • • • • • •City of Eden Prairie . 2 May 23, 1977 • The following information summarizes our plans for this property, which we intend to complete this summer: • - Repaint exterior to white • - remodel and redecorate interior - re-landscape around home, walkway and parking lot • - fill south 1/2 of property according to Barton-Aschman plan - pave parking lot area for 18 cars - seed and landscape remainder of site filled but not paved according to Barton-Aschman plan - erect sign as drawn by Nordquist Sign Company and approved by city. - sod portion of existing driveway. The enclosed material from Barton-Aschman and Associates depicts the site plan, survey, parking lot, fill area and boundaries of the site. The site • is adequately served by a private well and septic system. • It is our sincere desire to cooperate with the city in every way to accomplish this re-zoning as soon as possible. Yours very truly, ruce C. Bermel Executive Vice President BCB/cn Enclosure: 1 1 ,'••.,.•....•: •..1,..;..'":.':',:•:..i.: , .. . • •'. . . \ ., . • •;•,•:‘,.,.,•,-..r..j::1",',1•A?•••:,s, . . \ • ,:-••• .:-. -T-s..'0,,.N.,;:$- ; '. ' ! ' '‘',.•,,7,,..',.1..-•::':'..,:,,:', , ... • • • i. .,)t...'::••.• " .. '-•-...*..':i.';-.'.. , : ; •;•it ••'..., `4I. :I.,:,..:'-'4.-:'...'.. : :.II.,.•:. ';-'-'•'II "IN.......i".1 i';'.‘...''‘7:...:•;•*--. ..:•`,*..' ' ,. -., ... .. s'N= ;..,,...;;•.-';.?:-..-';'-`,,,,^`...,,,•••.•:'•:..?,--•, .• 7 ': - ` ':. • .i•••4.•:'''.:'•''..i.';'i•:;. '•••-s•,.° ..:••-.-..:•,-----,-- . . _____ '• 16....., „" . ' :2.• ••e'•:',,r,','. .:cc,••••••••'-';-=-'••••••••,:,,......-.,-. - ft, .9‘.-- •• .. / P: -;•.:" .N.--'•:.:-••••-- . i .' '• •' !" ' : ' ;;;..*, 7 ,.. ...; ,.t.• ., ''' itti; \ I ..;:f.7';''''F: . ,:' . . ,.. • • tr'•_..0,-",,-, ::.- .•,.:,_••::.'E...7-c,‘‘- --•'''''-': .N49 \ ' ' .' ''' '. , ;,..„-,..e.„:„:„.. -.,,•-\,•-.:....,, • \ • N\ ,4•:,;,, , 4::,?..14:i,•'-:;•'.•:•4., .•\\:•:;•••,',4.:). /4 ,•,.. ...,_4.4 „...........-"•••••••-•••••;,_ \il , .. .. .• • e4:':,:.!",••4.1 \'':••:`:,. •.4., 1 t3- J;, -77' `.4:,,LI, :••r.,,, \ •7.50::',;,,, •-.).'",1.11:-,,, -- 1 ,': .' ,:.- • , !:•„-,i.':..t.‘,-1. r(,1,,:-....,-,, A., —,----,-- ..;,..' L-.4*.1',.''.-''.- :, '--•- • .. 4.•,..,.-•---77-t.'f'-'--,:-,'7:7; '''Aii,-,------7—:-.-:.,,t,-,-----;;;L.4-,,,,,,,. -,. ..,-- -,--,,,...„ s-- yr''.,-,,,J,,,,,,,p,:,-,-,-..--„,--11:11. r 1 1....!-.7..71--,..i''''..V,-II.7. •-•F,4k., l'.;-.'71 /,`....".'t"','1.,---..,:.'.',.., , ,-:-J.-•..'!.-::;Zi'I.:,''-if: T. r L''1. I 11 LI" ':I" ••••1,1.---j•:'•'-.''---/,, ---;_,\,ti- -1.,•••,- ,,i;;;',,,r• -,..., ••• .:-7 , :1 1 .4 i -.i , -: -.:-,17---,- , .,/-.----,,-,-z,-_,F„--- ,-;--- /NN\ ..,..,,,,...,,:.••7 ;,,:t 1(..1--Tti.14, ,..-..,--=-,'•-..---),:•.,,, :•,[.; .i .„ .,, ,,,.....,,,--„:„--.--,: ...z..---.. ‹.,,, ,./.•,,• ' j•-----i7_72.3:--- -- -",771:, 0 ••••>,,':?: .'.,-/•: :,..L,----,-1-1 --- -.:-, ,..I.- _:-..:!N.:':... ...,.',...'Ir-I!\'.': • ( ••Zi 1 ' : Thi' " 1 i 1:Ili 1 fk.,,i::(It"II, , ., : , .•I, k i ". • ' K.tsa-,.., :1,„ ,,-,-- ,„_ • , -,' '',- ' ' . I I •/' •. . t',1 - - - •\---\;.:-.1 1,'.10 -•'''' :''; '.;44-•.:',...:•- --'-H•'•• 1......4.,jr.; ' '1_.- '' '' s.' i: , ='! ' . •,--7 - Ni- ---- I'/51:41 --...., t ,—r- :,--,-.- ---4-c li , -- ..::::,-M- , •,-Ji•-•,' "---.4.-... 01 . am".-.. • ' - '• Immrk , , :..-..) . ....„•. ..., ,,,, .„ ._ ....... _,...7.-„, , .s, ....,•-....:-._:- /... 11 I:, ;,41-!--.7 --,,'.. ,„1-7--:----:-..-,..,, 4 -' .:Ta I.-, ..':-: . A:,: II 4,-.:-_‘..f I\ I.. I '[4,.52, :::: :I'-':. I--_--.- i'--I._'..-..„;'.'.:'''' '-'-, 4 4 :11).11.-.-71., '.-.-..:: .- IEE---:,,,. .--, :,-.. '' :...,:.%. ::::,..,; ,. .• i;',1i 11,.,...-.. I k 4 04 1 1''''' 'II-.-'1 11;.'..5.'''''''''.'''''':':.":'.'4.r.'7..‘7..?4*=77. •4, ,: .4 ., :‘,.‘"''.. -' '.''''''.,..'4. loifs :;.•:n.'' ' 4'''4.1 4.V•4% ''k,'; ,r:. -..'‘''; '''''''''':' 44.44....:..:( '4:7'3''... '' ''‘4 ..? 4,11.:4:1L‘, ;..r'-:-•,-_ •: , ‘•'l'•„ .' ' \ - -'''•:..--,----,-'.. ...r.' -` ",-II) -;A;::-....'.:.€. --7-I-77,7:ti. .,,,i; -.,._..,,,,...,,',,•,',1-7,.:• -•,-.:_,..,,• ,......-•-,,,,,,,-- __:,,,...-f•--r-*,'.--',-,---•--•,-----,:----, •-r-',.,I,'`." . ••,,'; ,:•:./,•1'.,,.\vs.-•, ..•"7--" ,....---1-,..a_•„-, --I:._ •'+'-*--', 'i. ;,..? _ ---F---,.----'-.-, .-__;; - %-5c•-;.,,------____::_J-- ..k).v," .., :-,....;/-,, " el ‘ ;!.:,.. '.. ., .... .,...... -.,•_-.- 5.;i• '',:1%-': /,,q,'• /•,-'''' :_\;; ‘;;1*.• ' s•-::-..-,' t;••----f-''"7:'\ ..,•,--,:_-•-- --- - :•/;•.':-;.;<././'..1:1 ;\I. 1 Iii ,,, k' - „:- ;'.- ._,.......:-,...'::: ----•',' -'- -1,•:,• -,,..-:., , ..-,..;,, ‘i . '', '•': •:-.....3------7"--:-_,:i..:.7''-"I' -.::. --"I----r-'-f-F-',-:.`:-`.....c:I. I.''.1.;:ic:1;II..-4'''17.''''..11:1p''-'-'.- '':'.--..-,-- _ ' ‘,..i...,....1...--;=' ',.. I.C.____.,.:.;•i`..:14 :'''-:::: .., ,..,1 ,.;:t.....)...)/ ',' -...'.:..'.-.:iv-/-' ..:: .: . c:'. .....•.,.:... I.,- -;. ,... .-.17,,..,'::.::.:, .:k11,,,f,..t.; , r'5`.'..):'';. '-"e./7.Z41/....I.!,I '.,. ...-..'.'.)...I VIi`; ':',I'l,..;'1,I4.I:,,'...f1.;;I:',...?•: :.E4'I.il.4":i qf' 1 • ' ' !,11';',.',,,:....i.A......,..•:.,..:,.... •— -...r.i./k,,..,. .../.•;•,,, p ERFAuGi'.t"8J'JI T( ...e...,«.w... :.. o 4 as r w s coIwr.y<r tI0U9Z�'—....— I I 9 GONVGRT TO orr,ce 1 .1 a, \ • *0 7//1 . i I 1 , A' ,. E m ( '' , ` °' . ,i ,1 8 T i rII ...MpCmJv'AaVmL.e ..: , 7�_ IdISO , . .7..,JLJN :4'1 ,',:, .: ,.1.. ..., . ./ I 3 �� ,Ae ds , )k" J '914N'. .r, I \, .8 �` I// SITE PLAN •,� SLGTI ON • orr/ct 'L.',TRECT I[ lC rY wddtll .. ... _• fi►. it.- -_—ir,r 1 ..... easy.w I a !. ,1 n cur iy • awn.ti NY Air Bcm1d-5i11aby May 2, 1977 1# City of Eden Prairie %Richard Putnam e' Planning Director 7601 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55343 Dear Dick: • Regarding rezoning of 8110 Eden Road, Formerly the 8ensch property,in accordance with our recent conversation and your conversation with Carl Sandstrom,enclosed is the rezoning application Form you requested we complete together with our check for$200.00. As we originally discussed,it is the interest of Bermel-Smaby Realty, the present owner of the property, to remodel this property cn the inside and to repaint, rclundscape and particl!y surface the front yard and open the property as a new residential real estate office for our company. It is anticipated we would have approximately ten sales associates together with a secretary and assistant manrcer and it is our hope that the rezoning of this property could be done in time for us to open on or about June 1st. We are making arrangements to have a drawing submitted to you showing where the blacktopping will be on the south of the property For parking. There will be no other physical change to the property at this time except for painting and other minor exterior adjustments. It is our plan ultimately that this building will be removed from the site and the balance of this site filled and an office building constructed upon it;however, this would not be for five years or so. We would like to locate a sign on the property i t South of the driveway and will very likely have this done by the Nordquist Sign Company. We arc checking the sign ordinance requirements and designing something that is similar to our other signs and will bring it in to you when it has been drawn up. Please advise us of the Council Meeting date and Planning Commission Meeting date if needed and also advise us of any other information you may require. Yours very truly, BERMEL-SMABY REALTY, INC. /5. GCL-G✓ Bruce C.Berme{ Executive Vice President BCB:ab ends. -Contract for Deed Land Development application form Check for$200.00 f I Y • • • approved rianr.ir:g Cn-rr:ission -5- May 23, 1977 1'. FETI T l0':S AND REQUESTS : PUBLIC HEARINGS: • A. Outlet F, Edenvale Industrial Park 2nd Addition, request to rezone from l-Ceneral to l-2 Park and platting of the existing 3 lots into 5 lots. The planner reported the original zoning was granted but no ordinance was ever drafted, therefore the City Attorney, Engineer and himself will be meeting to determine the property's present .oning and to draft a staff report. Mr. Peterson stated the platting request is in response to the demand for small industrial lots. He added that he will be.requesting setback variances and will be subtitling such request to the staff for their review. Motion: kedpath moved, Schee seconded, to continue the Outlot F public hearing to the June 33th steeling and refer the item to the staff and City Attorney for a staff report. Notion carried unanimously. y&u9 MINUTES • EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Unapproved 7:30 City Hall Monday, June 13 , 1977 COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sundstrom, Schee, Lynch, Retterath, Bearman COPUIlSSl0N ABSENT: McCulloch, Redpath STAFF PRESENT Dick Putnam, Jean Johnson _IV. REPORTS AND RECO'IMENDATIONS _ A. Outlot F, Edenvale Industrial Park, request to rezone from I-General to I-2 Park and platting of the existing 3 lots into 5 lots. A continued .public hearing. The planner reported the request is to replat Outlot F into 5 lots 3 being less than 2 acres. He then referred the Commission to the staff report dated June 7th in which the staff is recommending approval of the requests contingent upon the variances listed on page 2. Mr. Peterson, Edenvale Inc., stated small industrial lots are in denard and they are requesting side, front and rear setbacks for the lots as was granted for the industrial park to the east. Bea man asked to be updated on the previous request for Outlot F. The planner replied previously, (Feb.'77), the request was for platting into 3 lots with zoning of I-General and 1-2 ,Park with some outside storage. He stated the present request is not for outside storage. Chairman Sundstrom asked if any member in the audience had questions or comments. None were raised. Motion_1: Schee moved, Lynch seconded, to close the public hearing on the Gutlot F preliminary plat. Motion carried unanimously. Motion?: Schee moved, Lynch seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from I- General to I-2 Park for Outlot F, Edenvale Industrial Park, a3 per the recommendations contained in the staff report dated June 7, 1977. Discussi on Bearoan inquired if the zoning of the property has been established as I-General. The planner replied the City Attorney would have an opinion by the time the item is reviewed by the Council. Sandstrom inquired if the 10 foot distance between the buildings and lot lines would crease an access problem to the rear of the buildings. The planner replied access to the rear of all lots would be necessary and worked-out with the Engineering Department. Vote: Motion carried unanimously. Mction3: Schee moved, lynch seconded, ro recommend to the City Council approval of t!.•r 01. lot F ere•:imtaary plat dated April 25, 1977 as per the recormerdati.tr.s 7, i:;7 sta':C rcr,ort. 1;ti,n ...rir.i un air;rni:lv. 11 O 'PLANNING STAFF REPORT • TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant THROUGH: Dick Putnam, Planning Director DATE: June 7, 1977 • APPLICANT: Edenvale Inc. PROJECT: Replat of Outlot F, Edenvale Industrial Park • LOCATION: North of Martin Drive, East of Corporate Kay, West of Commerce Way and south of the proposed vacation of Rieman Road. REQUEST: Rezoning from I-General to I-2 Park • Replat of 7.51 acres into 5 lots Edenvale Incorporated proposes to subdivide Out lot F, Edenvale Industrial Park into 5 lots ranging in size from 26,000 square feet (.6 acres ), to 2.94 acres sec figure 1 . The 1-2 Park District has the following requirements: ' • 2 acre lot size side setback: 20' one side, 40' both sides 200 foot width 25 foot rear setback 300 foot depth 50 foot front setback The proponent is proposes the following variances from the I-2 District: Lots 2,3,4 6 S setback variances of 30' front yard, 10 ' sideyard and 25 ' rear setback. Lots 3,4, 6 5 lot size variance • PRELIMINARY PLttT Figure 1 EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 3rd ADDITION I. a replat of outlot F edenvale Ind: park / ;•'l•'ot ` i fi + • ilir Lill 3 l: 4 I / !• 4e, ' 4 a•l a 1mac. ;' ILIJ 1�g5� \ `mac:;• _. 'T,cI j • I Staff Report-Outlot F,Ind. Pk -2- June 7, 1977 A large stormwater drainage ditch bisects the site on the east side of lot 1 and will create an easement for city storm sewer drainage and is also a logical line to divide the, lots. No grading will be necessary to accomplish the development other than normal excavation and grading at the time of building. Edenvale's Industrial Park is bordered on the west by railroad tracks, on the south by TN 5 , on the east by Mitchell Road and on the north by Purgatory Creek and Edenvale Golf Course. Zoning to I-2 Park is consis- tnent with the surrounding uses. The industrial parks to the east and I` south are both zoned 1-2 Park. This zoning district does not provide for ,, • outside storage so screening should not be a problem. �r' A___;.AN, . ,.. , , 4. . ..„ ,, . 7__ __ ,________ ' ' AAA 0: RECOMMI'IENDATIONS: Due to the location of Outlet F in tho center of the Edenvale Industrial Park, the staff makes the following recommendations: 1. That the property be zoned from I-General to I-2 Park with the following variances: -lots 3,4 f, 5 to he less than 2 acres in total area -lots 3,4, G 5 will be developed using setbacks as follows: 30 foot front yard 10 foot side yard 25 foot rear yard (lots 1 G 2 being in excess of 2 acres would use normal 1-2Park standards) 2. That the preliminary plat for 0utiot F be approved for 5 industrial lots on approximately 7.5 acres. it.>2 • • • • , q •. \ ' S - 0, .I. . LI_________.______- . ti • v N - - k'aY I ( 04 j y b S \ i i ... . / A w (11 ' / s ' • / ,.., • ..4.{,-,':, : lji, i,,il ° r / "t / \ry M % / C .?" L \ reCJ I' l // N '•• y I b\ O• Orr Y .i fffff/ \ --I -4 ! ?' / \ to r r t•/ 3 • i A • 0 1 `I, i r • n • t. cammorco, taay ,°, •l� = • aac3 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 77-86 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS ON RILEY LAKE ROAD, I.C. 51-305 WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the City Council on June 21, 1977, recommending the following improvements: I.C. 51-305, Bituminous pavino on Riley Lake Road (limits to be specified) WHEREAS, all property owners whose •property is liable to be assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice and the hearing was held and'property owners heard on the 21st day of June, 1977; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that said improvement 51-305 on Riley Lake Road is herein ordered. ADOPTEd by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PUBLIC WQRKS DEPARTMENT • FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR BITUMINOUS ' SURFACING ON RILEY LAKE ROAD • I.C. 51-305 . June 14, 1977 • I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 04, at Car , P.E. City Engineer Registration No. 9323 �� i - 1 - FEASIBILITY REPORT 1 I.C. 51-305 1 • 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to presentto the City Council an examina- tion of the feasibility of improvement project I.C. 51-305 in terms of the nature and scope of the proposed construction, estimated total cost, assessment rates and scheduling data. On May 17, 1977, the City Council received a petition signed by the prop- erty owners along Riley Lake Road. A public hearing date was then set for June 21, 1977. It was recommended that the hearing he called for the entire unpaved length of Riley Lake Road from Co. Road 1 to the west • City limits. • 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND COST The proposed improvements on Riley Lake Road involve construction of a two (27) inch thick bituminous mat over the existing gravel subgrade, approximately 22 feet wide from County Road 1 to the west City limits, excluding a length of approximately 1000' which was paved in the fall of 1975. The attached map shows this location of the project and the parcels involved. The bituminous mat will relieve the severe dust problem for several lot owners adjacent to the roadway and will also help reduce City main- tenance costs by eliminating periodic oiling and grading. The Municipal utilities will not be available to this portion of Eden Prairie for several years, so that sewer and water installation plus complete street upgrading are not feasible at the present time. The estimated cost of the proejct would include $14,000 for the asphalt mixture plus City engineering and maintenance crew time and equipment time to prepare the suburade and place the surfacing. The 1976 assess- ment rate for the previous paving was $2.33 per foot. Updated to 1977, this rate would be increased by 8% to $2.50 per foot. There is a total of 6,865 assessable feet remaining on the project and, accordingly, the City should recover 6,908 feet times $2.50 or a total of $17,270. 3. ASSESSMENT OF COSTS The attached preliminary assessment roll shows the parcels and front footages involved for the complete project and also an alternate assessment roll for a reduced project which would involve paving only 400 ft. of roadway abutting Lots 2, 3 and 4, Aud. Subd. $372. The owners of these lots are those who have signed a petition for the im- proveaent. - 2 - If the reduced project is selected we would recommend that each of the ' four property owners involved share one fourth of the project cost. We discussed this possibility with one of the petitioners (Mr. Anderson) before the petitions were turned in and it seems to be satisfactory. 4. FEASIBILITY Proposed Improvement Contract 51-305 is feasible and will benefit the properties proposed to be assessed. upon determination of the scope of this project by the Council, the Pub- lic Works staff will proceed with plans for the pavement work. We an- • ticipate delivery of a new paving machine by Aug. 1. The work would be completed shortly thereafter. • - 3 46�7 t�,20caD �I GCT �4cc r) L R N :::....•.• ' j N.-N..'"). I, CR j7'----) 5 /-' IG.51-so — i SC <-- N -57- E!-E I"'500 1 t �Gn L11.�1,T5 • ADD' Sue Y (7,25°.,),,, i • ...!:......... f I / : • a:. (Soo) / i.!-..i....!..:-..::::::!:.!...:--;E:-......-.:.•..:::-:.-..!....-. .:::.::. ......::::.:!::: :::.: !:...::,..::-.....:.!!!, :::.:::: .:; !.....-::.-::!! i::: -..::::-, !: u / 9 _ C s0 Y , .�,ysi XOc '7r�_ Et. / y� o> o: pp . . . . . . . . . . . . . •.Flp ,/ ,//1 T ,. = • i . - • / _ . ., . - U/,,Z . , . ft I.C. 51-305 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Total Assessment Total Property Owner per 1976 Front For Complete For Reduced Description Tar. Records Footage Project ($2.50/ft) Project Sect. 19 • • (2475) Joseph Dolejsi 1305 3262.50 500 (3600) Howard Good 500' 1250.00 - (4012) F. J. Schmidel 520' ' 1300.00 - (6800) Jerome Jacques 490' , 1225.00 - (7250 2825' 7062.50 - Aud. Sub. DiV. 372 Lot 1 Anna Tutewohl ]45' 362.50 - Lot 2 Sandra L. Anderson 326' 815.00 500 Lot 3 Mrs. Howard Perkins 117' 292.50 500 Lot 4 J. M. Kirtland 60' 150.00 500 Lot 5 Mrs. Howard Perkins 60' 150.00 - Lot 6 Leonard Swedlund 560' 1400.00 6908 17,270.00 2000 INSy - s - • MEMO TO: Mayor Fenzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer C DATE: June 16, 1977 SUBJECT: Hendrickson Brothers Land Division The attached letter dated May 11, 1977, from Mr. Dennis L. Peterson, is a request for the City Council to review the March 18, 1976, decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments regarding a variance for a land division for the Hendrickson brothers',property south of Co. Rd. 1 and west of Cedar Forest Addtiion. • For the council's reference, attached hereto are minutes of January 15 and March 18, 1976, Board meetings, pertaining to the Hendrickson's property. The final Board action is shown in page 4 of the March 18 minutes. The drawings attached hereto show the existing property_lines prior to the Board's action and the new lot lines after the division approval. At this point, two new homes have been constructed and all requirements of the Board's approval action have been been complied with, except that some sodding is required on the southerly side of the driveway leading to Cedar Forest Drive in order to prevent erosion of the embankment. Mr. Robert Hendrickson indicated that this work will be completed in the near future. There is a dirt driveway connection between both Hendrickson homes so that it is physically possible to drive from both residences to either Cedar Forest Drive or Co. Rd. 1. This is probably good from an emergency ac- cess point of view, and certainly makes little or:no difference regarding traffic volumes on Cedar Forest Drive. We will ask Mr. Perbix to be pre- pared to comment on the legal aspects of this interconnection on next Tuesday evening. Also attached are the approval letters from the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District and the Landhold Agreement. CJJ:kh Attachments • • • t1AY 1-3 1917 DENNIS L.PETERSON • ATTOONET AT LW • 605 FOURTH AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 400 . MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55415 TELEPHONE 30E.001• May • Eleven 1 9 7 7 Mr. Roger Ulsted City Manager City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 • Re: Driveway installed by Gerald E. Hendrickson 1736 Pioneer Trail which extends to Cedar Crest Drive Dear Mr. Ulsted: I have been retained by one of the residents on Cedar Crest Drive to represent his interest in the above matter. On March 18, 1976, the Board of Appeals and Adjustments had a hearing involving the division of the property on which Mr. Hendrickson's house now sits. The minutes of that meeting appear to indicate that Mr. Hendrickson was given authority to install the driveway in question. However, according to residents who were at that meeting the minutes to not accurately reflect what transpired. Therefore we would like • to have this matter placed on the next available City Council agenda for an appeal of the decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. It is my understanding that the present city ordinances require an appeal within 45 days of any decision such as this. However, I have also been informed that this ordinance was not passed until after March 18, 1976, thus this decision will not fall under that ordinance. It has also been observed by the residents of Cedar Crest Drive that both the residence of Gerald Hendrickson and the residence owned by his brother are being served by the driveway from Cedar Crest Drive. Even assuming that the minutes of the decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustment of March 18, 1976, are accurate, this use is not allowed as the second residence must use the driveway to Pioneer Trail. page-2- Mr. Roger Ulstead City Manager Please advise me as to when this matter can be placed before eforectthe eeCity Council. If you have any questions, please Ver ruly yours, Dennis L. Peterson • DLP/cf • cc: Carl Jullie, Eden Prairie Engineer Duane Cable • ti/62 • t Unapproved , MINUTES 0 BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUST1 71S THURSDAY, January 15, 1976 7:30 PM CITY BALL Y Members Present: Chairman Jim Wedlund • Y • Donald Sorensen Jim Cardinal Joan Meyers Members Absent: Tom Cebulla Staff Present: Wayne Sanders, Chief Building Inspector I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 23. 1Y75 MEETING Sorensen moved to approve Minutes of October 23, 1975 as written. Wedlund seconded, Nation carried. Meyers abstained. APHRDVAL OF MINUTES OF NOV2,BER 13, 1975 MEETING Wedlund moved to approve Minutes of November 13, 1975 as written. Cardinal seconded, motion carried, with Meyers and Sorensen abstaining. CkI. ORGANIZATION A. Swcarina in of Members for vocominr year. Chairman Wedlund declared that the swearing in of members of the Board for the next year vas the first order of business, in order to have a duly constituted body. This was accomplished. ; B. Nomination of Officers Wedlund was elected unanimously to serve again as Chairperson fcr the year. Cebulla was elected unanimously to serve as Vice-Chairperson for the year. Cardinal was elected unanimously to serve as Secretary for the year. III. NEW BUSS?;ESS /A. Study Materials for Variance re,uested bv.Jerry hendrickson Chairman Wedlund announced that this Item will be postponed until a future i date, because additional information has been received and because it is not now reedy for this Board. He added that the ten day advance notice will be given when this Item comes vp again. ) B. Peter Canine - 5)28 Danens Drive. Edina - Variance Reovest Chairman Wedlund turned over the floor to Mr. Peter Lumina, to state his request. ,_.ard of Appeals and Adjustments -2- March 1e, 1976 Meyers asked how many emrloyees Vohs had. He answered myself and.a son. 1 J Meyers also asked what distance are your present neighbors. Vohs said that , the present platted area to the south is a long distance away and there is a farm to the north across Pioneer Trail. Cardinal asked what is the dis- tance between the proposed building and the proposed house. Vohs replied approximately 50 feet. MOTION Motion was made by Cardinal, seconded by Meyers to deny this request for variance with the following reasons and findings: 1. It basically goes against the ordinance. 2. It would set a presidence of going against an ordinance. ! 3. The structure is as large as the home. • Discussion followed and Cebulla stated that this would be allowing a type of factory in a residential area. It can be redesigned in the home. Meyers said that she agreed with the other two gentlemen. It would become a free • standing business. Sorensen also agreed with the others and added the I following: no unique hardship, no unique circumstances, no deprivation 1 of use of property. Granting would constitute a special privilege. The side yard setback would be bad. Vohs asked that should he notr: incorporate this into his house, would we I object to exceeding the Unit'of 2 horsepower for electric motors. He pointed out that most homes exceed this limit. -- } Sorensen said as he saw the ordinance, it addresses this limit only to where there is a home occupation. The entire board voted in favor of denial of the variance. II. iecrest of Gerald Hendrickson permittino a variance from Ordinance No. 93, J Section 3 and zoning designation in Ordinance No. 135 allowinc a division iof_nrc'perty in the rural district having less than 300' frontage on a ; kublic rieut-of-way_ Cebulla asked Sanders to explain the layout of the land. Mr. Jack Miller, :,ttorney for the Hendrickson party, also explained the case. Miller spoke i of the dui-der-nac being patted up to the,property line. He stated the intent 1 was to build only one more home that would exit off of Crestwood Terrace. Soiensen asked when the James Sands property was divided off. Sanders i said that there was no land division for this home. Sorensen asked about the road entrances at the cul-de-sac at Crestwood Terrace might be possible 1 should they be SO feet or 60 feet. Attorney Jack. Miller asked about any developer coming in and platting lots. Sorensen said in Ordinance No. 135 it does not allow for platting of this type of property that is not serviced by city sewer and water. Meyers asked if the Hendrickson's would enter into an agreement with the City. Miller said it is possible, however, he did not know how mortgage companies would look at this. Miller explained the financial crunch that people arc faced with today especially the Hendrick.son's1 . with this piece of property. 3 Board of Appeals and Adjustments -3- March 18, 1976 ! Sorensen asked if this home that Mr. Gerald Hendrickson would like to build \ • ! would be placed according to some future plat. Miller answered no, it is not placed according to any special plat. Sorensen asked Miller if a Landhold Agreement were entered into, would it be a problem to the Hendrickson's. Miller indicated he did not think it would be a problem. Duane Cable, 17181 Cedarcrest Drive, expressed his views. Sorensen asked Cable as to why he was so concerned with the soils and water table. Cable said he is concerned with soil erosion and when future homes are built they cause dif- ferent drainage. William Marshall, 17591 Pioneer Trail, the owner of 5 acres of property, said he was in favor of the proposal and was in favor of granting the variance. Bob Hendrickson, one of the property owners, sited the drainage from the land would not overall be changed if a home were built on this property. Sorensen said that a building would cause an additional runoff and asked the following questions: i` 1. Could a ponding area be built? 1 2. Would he build it if it is found necessary? Hendrickson indicated this is a possibility. Mary Cable, 17181 Cedarcrest Drive,-said listening to the comments we 7 see the following problems: 1. All variances should be consistent. 1 2. There should be a Landhold Agreement. 3. There should be a holding pond. She added that an alternate route to enter this property might solve the • whole problem. • • William Marshall, 17591 Pioneer Trail, said an alternate route had been suggested but it would have to be hard surfaced and there would be.more water runoff. Sorensen said Sands driveway seems to be unusable in the r 1 present condition. Would it be agreeable to hard surface the new driveway? f Sands answered yes it would be possible. Mrs. Cable asked if others can i use and benefit from improvements that they have not paid for. Sorensen isaid this is an acceptable use when extending a road. Ralph Bahr, I 17130 Cedarcrest Drive, said the real question is are there alternate ` entrances to this property. Sorensen said any other entrances to this property .would require a variance also. Sorensen asked to continue this 1 to another date and refer the matter to the City Engineer and Watershed District. Miller asked if he could read an agreement proposed to both parties (agreement is attached). 1 i MOTION { iSorensen made the motion to refer this matter until May 6, 1976. Cardinal seconded the motion. DISCUSSION Meyers said I feel this matter can be handled this evening. Cebulla, Cardinal and Meyers voted not in favor of continuing the meeting until May 6, 1976. Sorensen only voted in favor. t yob 't Board cf 7»meals and Adjustments -4- March 113, 1976 A4ENOED MOTION 3 Mayers made the motion to find in favor of a variance request of a division of property in rural district having less than 300' frontage on a public ' right-of-way as a reasonable interim use of the land requiring the land- owners to enter into a Landhold Agreement with the City of Eden Prairie, to be drafted by the City Attorney, including the following provisions \\ ' for the 29.15 acre parcel: Only one additional residence with access on Cedarciest Drive, only one additional residence with access on Pioneer Trail (County Road nl), no additional construction for 13 years or until public sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water are available and until constuuction of a public street system providing access west and north from the parcel. The approval shall be based on a schematic boundary representation dated March 18, 1976. Building site plans submitted to the Riley-Purgatory Creek _ watershed for.review.and recommendations on erosion control measures during construction, water runoff treatment and• 1 / driveway construction with review and modifications by City Engineering Staff. Landowners to comply with all requirements I .y prior to issuance of a building permit., j 1Cebulla, Cardinal, Meyers voted in favor of the motion. Sorensen voted against motion. Motion was carried and the variance was granted. -III. Variance request from Eagle £.nt.erprises, Inc..f emitting 5.4 perking spaces - 4.07 per 1,000 sq. ft. of cross leasable area in a neighborhood sh cooing center. Property located at the northwest corner of Highway 5 and County Road 04. Lance Norderhus presented his proposal for 5.4 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. and said it was more than enough to supply ample parking for their business. Norderhus also said that a variance will also be required for the proposed sign on the property. Sorensen asked about the screening of the open sales area on the west end of the store. Sorensen also asked if Norderhus would object to making the parking variance contingent upon screening at the west end of the building. This screening would have to be agreeable to the City staff. Norderhus indicated that he could do this. Meyers said that she would like to see better screening at the • west end of the building and would like to sec something better for shared parking. Norderhus said that wood railroad type ties would be used for steps to the church parking lot. MOTION Sorensen moved that the board grant the parking variance for•5.39 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. according to standards developed by the City staff with the following provisions: 1. If parking is found to be inadequate according to the City staff, then the landowner shall provide additional parking by one of the following methods: a. Removal of exterior lawn and garden shopping areas. • b. By ramping. c. Other :.jeans acceptable to the City staff. 0 , — .L • O,f6 15650) , n__ S a ( J t.y 1' tt �}y vw B rv" .Qv ,°, fly „i may: vT_r.f. _�_ a.�. ` ��. Let' .! ;. . ...ell ,> "• JJ ti • v i , `G a . : 15730) .,,. ., : .« r • . ,� • : .eeuni•. 1` �1}JA' C.1,F�✓ 7i o -. . I�Set' ,� �25 $ 3 evi,,"` , • •t V. ! O: +' • ' 7 la y.1`i _e rt•--:, ,-- I I2,01 ..A .4,• ,y�,.,•. ,y. ° y : ?ei,i ,, 4 - ,:.,. "- •ry . o • O ,,,, .o62tp7: , s. oR�L��t-A V �nGEL �730 2 ,Z t: /e ;.,,..ry .,ot6: 1,2 - r3 0 30) .2 v S::•• u: • L- y j.4 3.c ,� U �f. J •Y ''tom M `Q. '• s .'4,.• N r.. • ...'n::-.i.:;::..'..;..... ..,,:. ...',.'.'••.:.."05. , • le , . . .. .. --CI-7—-:. ic'' ; • 1 • . •• ..:: • . C.) ' , I. ,.,•• s. . L s • ' . .,.{ 37 3 ',;• --- .. . ii. et. . ;•:. • ...... ; . 6 ..._._ ..z. . -„••,-,.., • 5 ' 1 :., N. ij• a ,.15660) 17625/ 6 —. .%):••• U. ,r..r.v:— '. 1 i.,...,0. , •,.: ,c.2 1.,.:,.. ‘,..... .,‘ 5 ,. .'. -' .... ..... ,. I.:3 :..s ..:JP .... r -6 7, ! ,,,c'N. .,,,, : f.: %. • --.; —:.------1.7777-7.):. f.:s:' , ,,ti.t.‘,:•‘ •—.• :... • , :01:9 1.: , .....; .- 4..,-„.; . . •, : NJ \ 4 : 7... :,...... 4.t:::.':f. .. -': ".• e...•); ,\,• 1 •:::1:—';,,' ••'• "; ..•:.•.' .!•...:: :• ,,,2%,,,.. A ..:' 156/61 ••4V IS.'S.• ..,-;. 'L.- z.. . . ..... •• • \\ 4 %.:r,.: ;F:7"..:"4, F.''• `'.... .''''1'' . ca.' 4; \\:' . • :"...., ..z.'.1' •'.• - at 1\t . ..:1:•+ kk % 2 ..ii ;"7". . {::.", •.r ';.:f 45.1 ._,..• ''...; :. r." . ..... • ,I t 1.33 ' •• - • 2. „ (5730) ......li,..:., ...„ ,.,-4:777::-T: ..,:.'•i.". •. 11 • . . ‘ sr..,ss • 4. ;es' *I 7.,•-•-•iiz 5 I.; 4 § l' TRACT 14 • - zu:: - 0:2 • ••• ,,, Li;,..,„;.,:-..:-. . , •,...i 24 ,„ ..) 1...,. __„,,•••,...J,,, , i ... s ...; 44:,f•. ../..?.• . ..I. • 1 t • 3 .. •.," -.114.•,- • • \ . . ••• • ... . _,..., lizAcx A I' _ • 6 — .:. ••;:e.C3 .. . ....• , s \\ • :'1 -1;0 t•-° ,,..,•• 46 ...-:•:. 5 ........I''tt../VII • •P' 1.1:....,.%)."•,- ..'...5;..1, N A. > .... ''..'T. '',1. 5 '... • ‘•,, -4.0. ,•••• „An, " cc, ••-•,,.. z. -. •\. .. . ,, • .„ '-••:' ..-: .,•::;- .3 , ....:`,•i"..%-.. .• 11210) II fe...14E.1..b7.1Ct(aA.7 '.j.i;vi."- . '-:. ':,',.••-.:. _._.'v.;•••.,..'.1.* I. .. ,,. ....ot •••• ...:. ,.,-. .., • - 1 II i ik SE I . .... . 1....—,:713".".,'' t. •'-''' 1 ., Tr,A t 1 D :-.*TI;;.7'.,.•,!-....0.'.'.:':%', 1 . _ :. 4‘....-,;..•.:!• 4 ; .....-. %•:-:••... e. •'I.,,,,,,. 4,,;':'.I •1 .... ..".f :4 C:: ::•••••.?,'..‘,"*.f,:it 0';''' . ..r• if' i .. 2 ,, :..: - -., .., ••-,• .• • 1,. :,..••• /1,::: :Zr: . ' ..:' ... 112 30) '-'., .13 i._, 4. s. 2'''... \I .. ' .:".••••• '' 6, 14E.1.11*-10r.SOL) S.1.1.4:* :.• '.• 14 . 4" 4......:::'"'''''.3.... S:. ii tili-%.11 r---) •..• .....„:.• 42 * „,..,' . TR CT ..... i-.,-- i Hsi. 1 •,:,,.,•, "." .zy •:•:,..... .4 f cAP't 4 r ..;es.:.-, '-'• f.4., .' *-..'.. /, ---le/ . ....•...`,1--',-',- :*". ‘.x' n.-.0 .,..c. • 5 " 6 3 • f‘L.1 VO i . •:: ..,:.•• .. • •. 0 I• ,.. .- -.. - .....- ii . -- ..1• -..-..., :..;• -A :. : - .. - 11220) -. • '..: 0\C‘ P. .. .. 7 **.7. 4. •• z .... 1,..2)sets.!4/f p . qx/ , 4:4,, ::,:- . ,...., ...., .. . __ • ~�L Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District ee50 COUNTY AC AC ;• EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESCTA 55?c9 I April 7, 1976 • Mr. Wayne Sanders Eden Prairie Building Inspection Department 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Dear Mr. Sanders: The Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District as reviewed the location plan for the two homes to be built by the(Hendrickson) Brothers as submitted to the District. The following erosion control measures should he implemented. 1. i)urin5 construction, hay bales reinforced by snow fence should be installed in the drainage swale between the home sites to prevent sediment from entering the marsh area adjacent to the Cedar Forest Addition. 2. Due to the steepness of the proposed driveway, the driveway should be paved upon completion of home construction. 3. All areas disturbed by construction should be restored with top- soil and seed and mulch, or topsoil within 60 days after the natural vegetation is removed. If you have any questions regarding the District comments, please contact us at 920-0655. Sincerely, Allan Gebhard AG:ps BARR ENGINEERING CO. c: Mr. Conrad Fiskness Engineer for the District Mr. Frederick Richards Mr. .lerry Mendi i cbson Approv ;Z: Howard L. Peterson, President Board of Managers RILEY-PURGATORY CREEP. WATERSHED DISTRICT • • • • DECLARATION • • WHEREAS, tht undersigned,Gerald E.Hendrickson and • Husband and Wife; Robert C.Hendrickson and Husband • and Wife; and James M.Sands and Husband and Wife, • represent that we are the legal owners of real estate lying within the City of Eden Prairie and which real estate consists of approximately.44 acres,and is legally described as follows,to-wit: - i Parcel I • Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of Northwest 1/4•of Section 29, Township 116,Range 22; thence North along the West line thereof to a point distant 506 feet South from the Northwest corner thereof; thence East 400 feet; thence North 500 feet to the North line thereof; thence East to the • Northeast corner thereof; thence South along the East line thereof to a point • distant 290 feet North from Southeast corner thereof; thence West 752 feet; thence South 290 feet to Sord,line of Northwest 1/4 of Northwest 1/4; thence West to beginning; Parcel.2 - That part cf Section 70Townsltip 116, Range 22,described es follows, to-wit: • Commencing at a point in the center line of County Road No. 1, distant 542 35/100 feet Northeasterly from the West line of Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4; thence South 20 degrees,51 minutes,25 seconds East 495 feet; thence East 115ff 15/100 • feet; thence Southerly to a point in South line of Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 dist. 333 19/100 ft. W from SE eon. thereof thence West to a Pt. ;12 ft. E • front SW corner thereof then W parallel with W line thereof to said center • line then Northeasterly to beginning, except road. WHEREAS, said parties are desirous of dividing said Parcel I and Parcel 2 into lour.parcels anti constructing two additional siesidences thereon, and 4• WHEREAS, in order to so divide said property and so construct said homes, variances mutt be received from said City, and WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals and Adjustments of the City of Eden Prairie has granted a variance upon certain terms and conditions. ' • • 11170 NOW,THEREFORE, the undersigned, on behalf of themselves, their. heirs,grantees and assigns, make the following declaration and agreement as a condition for approval of the subdivision of the above described tracts of land into four parcels,the legal descriptions of which parcels are shown as Tracts A,B, C,and Don the attached surveys for Gerald E.Hendrickson, Robert C.Hendrickson and James M.Sands. (Exhibits A, B & C) (1) Tl•at only one residence will be built with access on Cedar Crest Drive. (Tract C1 (Tract A) (2) That one residence will be built with access on Pioneer Trail./This • requirement results in the creation of said Tract U. • . (3) That the undersigned will pot petition for, nor seek further platting of - (Exhibits A.B. 6 C)said Parcels 1 and 2,Jor a period of thirteen(13)years from the date hereof,or until public sanitary sewer system, municipal water system and municipal norm sewer system axe available or under construction, and further until such time as a public street system providing access West and North of said parcels is installed. (4) All building site plans shall be submitted to the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District and Ciry Engineering Staff for review and recomn'ien- dations on erosion control, water runoff treatment and driveway construction. (5) That the undersigned recognize and acknowledge that this agreement shall not waive building requirements and platting and subdivision requirements and all other City ordinances. r _ . IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned have executed this declaration this -' 5j 9_ day of /lam/<•y , 1976. Pl r u�.r /.. Q(-.> / ;2:7 ,S LC -2- q?7t • WHP/azd 5/11/77 3 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 338 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 111 AS AMENDED. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: • • Section 1. Ordinance No. 111 as amended, is hereby amended by inserting the following language at the end of the first sentence: "and to preserve, protect and improve family care homes for the mentally retarded, mentally ill, physically • handicapped, elderly and individuals needing rehabilitation treatment." Section 2. Section 4 of Ordinance No. 111 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following: "7. To continue evaluation of city ordinances and procedures in order to accomodate city group homes experience. 8. To maintain an up-to-date inventory of home locations, and possible areas for home locations that may be available. 9. To oversee the relationship between facilities and its neighborhood environment, and suggest and encourage communication between group homes and the community and initiate if necessary. 10. To review all applications for group homes in conformance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 289 as it may be amended, and prepare a report which details how each home meets City ordinances and State Law provisions. I/87 a WHP/azd 5/11/77 11. To establish liaison with appropriate State agencies and community groups that provide services for group home residents or are involved in their regulation. To act as a mediator to resolve problems or misunder- standings between homes and neighbors or State agencies. 12. To design and implement neighborhood and community wide education programs to enable citizens to better understand the needs and capabilities of group home residents and enable group home residents to better under- stand opportunities available to them within the City. 13. To work with the State and County agencies involved with deinstitutionalization policies to give Eden Prairie decision makers correct and advanced knowledge of new programs or regulations. 14. To provide a forum for all citizens to express ideas concerning the community based services concept. 15. To design ways that better and more efficient city/religious/school/civic organizations services can be utilized by group home residents. 16. To act as a coordinator of all group and foster homes to maximize their communication enabling better economic efficiency and program compatibility. " Section 3. There are added new sections to said ordinance which shall read as follows: Section 5. The board shall annually prepare and present to the City Council a Report in writing of its activities. Section 6. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its date of passage. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this day of , 1977, and - 2 - q �3 WHP/azd 5/11/77 finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of 1977. Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: • John D. Frane, City Clerk Published in the on the day of , 1977. - 3 - wiq whp/.ih 5/12/77 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 14 \\ A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 212 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie has from time to time stated publicly its concern about the lack ofstate and United States Highways and their adequacy as they traverse the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously gone on record of supporting the improvement of all such highways; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined and considers the improve- ment of U.S. 212 of immediate and urgent importance; and WHEREAS, said highway has been under study by various governmental agencies including the Minnesota Department of Transportation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie does hereby urge the Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Transportation that there be speedy acceptance and implementation of construction of U.S. Highway 212 in accordance with the guidelines set forth by Unique System D, which plan has previously been approved by the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City of Eden Prairie this _day of 1977. ATTEST: Wolfgang Pcnzel, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk �l8� kes/Jh 4/20/77 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 77,2E AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING NOISEY PARTIES AND UNLAWFUL TRESPASSES UPON THE PRIVATE IANDS OF ANOTHER WITHOUT FIRST SECURING WRITTEN PERMISSION FOR SUCH USE FROM THE OWNER OF SAID PROPERTY AND ESTABLISHING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION THEREOF. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. No person shall congregate on any private lands because of, or participate in, any party or gathering of people from which noise eminates of a sufficient volume or of such nature as to disturb the peace, quiet or repose of other persons. Any owner of such private lands who has knowledge of the disturbance and fails to immediately abate said disturbance shall be guilty of a violation of this ordinance. SECTION II. No person shall congregate on any private lands of another because of, or participate in, any party or gathering of people in the absence of the owner of said private lands being present, without first having obtained written permission from said landowner. Such written permission shall at all times be in the possession of one or more persons at the site of such congregation. The document containing the written permission must bear the signature of the landowner and date of the permitted use. Failure to display written permission upon request shall be considered prima facia evidence of an absence of permission from the owner. SECTION III. A violation of Section I or II above of this ordinance shall give a policeofficer the authority to order all persons present, other than persons identifying themselves as the landowner or owners to immediately disperse. Any person who shall refuse to leave after being ordered to do so ya'7( • by a police officer shall be guilty of a violation of this ordinance. SECTION IV. Violations. Every person convicted of a violation of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300.00) or by imprisonment for a period of not more than ninety (90) days, or both but in either case the costs of prosecution may be added. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this _ day of , 1977 and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the _day of , 1977. Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Published in the Eden Prairie News on the _day of , 1977. -2- • TO: Roger Ulstad s' FROM: John Frane RE: Tax delinquent properties ` • • DATE: May 31, 1977 • The following parcels are tax delinquent and may be claimed by the city (plat maps attached). Plat Parcel 56841 - 0210 the north 20 feet therof 56704 - 5810 56720 - 6700 • 56671 - 8400 Marty Jessen's memo of May 27, 1977 suggests we claim 3 of the 4 parcels for park or road purposes. The 4th parcel, which is the north 20' of Lot 1, Block 1, Eden School • addition (7800 School Road) along State #5 we could claim for a future widening of State #5. The City Council should pass a resolution indicating its intent to claim or not claim these parcels. If the city does not claim them they will be offered for sale as tax delinquent properties. • �l17F I 94 Al i i�r or • • • • • . / " / • k yr.. ( t.�/� 1 • / / f -F �.. / ` �: • IYv/ , I `��`I�,.�r 'Jiff. f 4 �.n• fyt ,•�`�. • r j • .• . ffff . • • ' i . yp�9 • • • AI• l `i • ' • • r ...mod _ 4-,L, ,. t • .* ;. • o( a w .. • %• r'.a -, vow • i us - ra( < ' f..- .pt - 8 r.;.As/• f - , • i a • . i • • . , • • • ,i • ' +' 3 r . .. Si ' , i J . a•ti . . '-• _ / 619 J . �— sri' �;': r _._ .— ._.— - ._`•4r / Yr t $ . 2,• : ,t'. ;....;..' 0 ,-.i t....1 1 .,. • co chvrY uo. I .____ _-_____.. —: ,-_-------..--•:.:7:---,- _4-77-7.- I ••••••••-f, , , F.' •;..".--:.,: - '':'-- I .1 • I 1 :* _... /1„c1C) 1 . f. • .-; i'"- 2 • i •••1'.‘ 1 . • • (coo) 074 4' ..1 ...1 " . ,bte l'••‘ i'''.4 • et -4 1 • . . _ • ' 1 1 ,.. . •• 1 _ . ..... c•••-, I :1 C)1 ki.It; "9) •-? : . - .1 It , • I 4: i 1(- 7.. .... 1 t4 . .i'L • / rt."1. ‘ I t I;AEA i • !t• 1 • • 7.1 I! ..,___ - ., 1 , I I % . la slaij 0* I /: i '.- 0 0 ROAD ... I — (97 iiii.. 1. 7-0P • I Ar , ct• .._ ... , ! ,.. (0 •i /:::,7:;' (.•..,....10, ! ....,,?! ;.,.,,r- cf,017/ !1:..,•'", „.,:;:•:;) : .; , I L , 4 • •:,:..f, - .„• ." (517P, ..• • ifr.4C)i ROAD 1/4/ 1 &-'Y iffel CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 77-76 A RESOLUTION STATING THE CITY'S INTENT CONCERNING CERTAIN TAX DELINQUENT PARCELS. BE IT RESCLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the City of Eden Prairie wishes to acquire the following tax delinquent parcels for park purposes. Plat Parcel 56704 5810 56720 6700 56871 8400 BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the City of Eden Prairie wishes to acquire the following tax delinquent parcels for right of way. Plat Parcel 56841 0210 which is the north 20' of Lot 1, Block 1, Eden School addition ADOPTED BY THE CITY PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL ON THE day of 1977. • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor SEAL ATTEST: John D. Franc, Clerk • TO: John D. Frane FROM: Harty Jessen . RE: Tax Forfieted Property DATE: Hay 27, 1977 I'd suggest we "claim" the following properties for the reasons given: Parcel 56704 5810 The property is adjacent to City owned land at Birch Island Park and will 'help us in providing buffer from the SF homes to the South. Parcel 56720 6700 We're currently trying to put together some kind of deal with Durance Company for the 300 acres with Cedar Hills. This small parcel is adjacent to Durance's property, we should take it in anticipation of purchasing the Cedar Hills area, or in any event for road purposes. Parcel 56871 8400 We are buying the Boomer Property just South of this parcel and own all the land to the East. This is the last "lowland" parcel in this part of the Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor - except the land way South along Valley View Road. • . i t g-t 1 t 4 i i i . N, r s► N cn Si N1 , $ 4:i 4 (isri-1 141. A %1 Y 4 I il ' i , i g 1 d 8 CQ �• - g .3 1 TZa 1 2 Z 11-- ttj 0 �- jjS - Ili N N N N 6' 4. t 6 i 1; )- ? i P a i ei i 3 3 • '(- 3,„ iz. , It i N p 4: U al `i-,. `tul T.4' 12 6:---A.— i. — r ._i t i it )- , �, QC z 'n a p a in ry S2 i 2 DATE: june 17, 1977 TO: Roger Ulstad FROM: Walter Johnson RE: Architect selection for City Hall After discussing the proposed project with Mr. Tom Carmody, Architect eod:,Mr. J, Nicholas Ruehl, Architect of the firm of Design Two, for the following reasons I think the Design Two firm would be the best selection. 1. Design Two, will reduce there fee by $1000.00 for reducing super- vision, they will still inspect the project for approving quanities and requests for payment. • 2.rDe&ign Two,,can.statt within'7 days,:.ana.will.have`..documents ready for bidding within 30 days. Because the firm is located in Excelsior, they will be able to work closely with the City. 3. The following is a list of some projects,that Design Two has com- pleted in and around Eden Prairie. Belmar - Office & Warehouse - Edenvale Condor - Office & Warehouse - Washington Ave P.E.I. - Office addition - Flying Cloud Drive Moser Residence - Highview Drive Litton Manufacturing Plant - Plymouth, Minn Condor - Office & Warehouse - Maplewood In talking to Mr. Tom Carmody, he told me that he spends most of his time at his fishing camp, North of Thunderbay, Ontario, Canada. Although he indicated that he would be able to handle this project, I feel that perhaps the City might be subject to unnecessary delays, because his priorities I'm sure are with his fishing camp which is 12 hours by train from the last of the roads. June 9, 1977 TO: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Keith Wall Alil • SUBJECT: Advertisement for bids - two Civil Defense sirens • We recently received Federal approval of our project application for two additional Civil Defense warning sirens and the permission to begin purchasing procedures. One of the two new siren sites is located at the end of Anderson Lakes Parkway and the other, 500 feet south of the end of Red Rock Road. These additional sirens are a part of our previously approved nine siren system (map attached). The Anderson Lakes Parkway ' site has been enthusiastically approved by the Preserve Homeowners Association. Letters were sent to all homeowners in the area of the Red Rock site and no negative responses were received. I also made a personal contact with Mr. Clark Fifield, whose home is closest to this site and he did not object. After the installation of these new units, the four operational sirens we will then have should warn approximately 80% of our city's residents. • The Federal agency responsible for warning projects dragged their feet considerably on our application approval. We asked Bill Frenzel's office for assistance and funding approval came shortly thereafter. Because there will be very little of the summer storm season left upon completion of this project, I would appreciate council permission to advertise bids as soon as possible. yYtG ,SIRE,JS ' I i .i ExiSrdG• • ATTACIINEUT B • e •41 t4( APP,ZeveD "Ti 4fyl4AiC EtIERGENCY7PLAN CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • ` 1 1 i 2 I 3 r 4 5' L 6 I 7 $ 9 i IU I R _ \_..toot _ r .r. r �� :+.— n / ...r'y;•.•. ��``•,:„...,..„...•:f/ i I" tri'-5f' 1�1Wfcif Nhn` :-_ _ loot�.: r/•". ` ,,=.,.:1 .a `k`..``� `"1> . i P ..Ji\� 1�` , ...trot�‘ p ' • iwt.�� / f r'. I ' ~• 250b .I I7 r il1,..,..÷.... -,r • l' 3a10 . p. ` fir, "�. If t 1 d .1 ..t \ Y 5001 a 1 r ."'Ili ti1 y I "N \_„ .1 j -1 --.III ' 1 142 013S 1 /� �,_ '' L.''.I. t _ �� ' 1 125bb 't', ! ti.Vf }1 1 s • 7 .•......... i �q4' `Ml`., 1 CAbnO�'/ 1 \ • r�r; : d L i I ms ' W t t w� ,f( n ► —. F / p • 0_ „..•,-.7"' '''''—'-'<`a_.;...ef.:;Z:....,--;•.,—....,...-1),„-. N.,1,,,, .....7" C's...,,k-l'i:7'N''':".:‘,.../4:4(. / j- I 7 i 1 !r. .ioo � '• #9 ii I/,L n--. !../d• .\•ti 1 #ID /K.'. -,.i -.72.;6— •1 aY r, { J 125 b .i: ', 5 t'.• ,4, .11 1 j\ I,:;;dd L✓ ) �)��1__ / X-`\ fI \�,I ,AN I• ' •....... t T ..12G Db • ,%i`' .. I ; w:a. i J�+,, `" K • !• \� f i ' aF I \ d �� 1 / T _ '' 14 i,4 L,r ,. 1 \ `vs 'F / / a\ t tt,',, i_ r•,, " ' OQ* 1, jot ;,, }1 '�.I s-t o r> * ✓ i I if /0-..7;;;,--;--4/1 •445 -...,. . f ,N, .. 1,'.../ 2:;. .........,":%::::——--..� { _ kip I? ""�_ °l ^1t' 1 _ _foot,. --- , 9 . Ni\I - t.. .1; 125 ub..._.1 kf* T ‘‘ • • i. :" ...n•, ."``._ _:...1. ?N,,...._,...._,:.,.2, ._ ++. \` 125 Db. —7 rti ., vA 1 (.. . V _,:,_IIk,:.III.'`...e.i, 1 e• _.`, (=,�`•!1 .r\.- ., /'l n ..r.�..�.,..�`. .toot' F 1 erne 1' '.` 5-� `„ \`vat`•i 7 J/ .�_ ,.ire � jj�� \ r.»s toot., , •, ... F 1.. �'s,s�.."ter.:. I 4' n A `o gg gg A g a 1 r r,—1— 8 F $ i 8 S Ir 6 8 '::` I ..� I__..,i. 4 !, j is I 7 ;i hIO_..�__._. PRESrNT COVERAGE' 59% . PROPO5E1) 93%. C rt Y ar ucc.ro EDEN PRAIRIE• I14141r t. br tort KEY rIM:ti ('II:vitlt. t:N51Nfi:I':INO DIPT. ' CXroiwe.. --- • • wl 11:01'Mr 0 • ••• q s(7 • • • j • . i. 4!P)M COMPARISON of SKS:ORDINANCE.4:61 AND SION DRfINAWT:ftepitrTrE nun Pape 2 • ORDI'AVCD 4261 ProefsionS (SOCD)SIGN ORI'INASfi COMPUTE.PNAIT Provisions Wert ion IV Diat rlet Keetlrat ions e. wltirle Fatally FM �rcti no Y 2enlnS_ln st rll_t Yet9tnllnnF I. Idcnt lficat ie,t Si no 6sAft The draft erd,n.rnrr',roasts a variety of s1Rnngr options within each efty-roning district. 2. Area Went if feat ie., 24 T'ahle i nod rattle II Jeirrihe the proposed regulations. • rr 3. IDstIwtior{Sip. : " • 4. ncessurOse-nr rntcrior si. ' 6. T.pornry r.ii:n.sot Sec. 3 TAKE I - - 1 6. Directional sign •• --_�-.-_."_ p.l PS AmT. Nis,height all signs 6 ft MS111711AL. Ndlt,lttt ,:.,CCi..L 14:t/1glA M t RU I son sr r. ;I Il' i 1 '.a;rT ! ►. coa000tiel U{sl ri rt C UPI SIGN Sirn 14NT Sir, 16nT s I i r"1 sit,!:-PT V06�:InGn re r 1 ar:I t 1 .,A ... I. Wall sign-13:•all area or Das.SOO sN ft AOIC;I0S 2.30202 ha: C g I /I 6 I _ • 2. Ireeslonding sir.4,1 per site RAII _ _ ' Das.601R ft.hclehi ;u ft fiat SI A f iS<\/�l 6 S I I / �IS\ 3. Area identification sign 06 gar!I.1f \I\/�I ,__. -l I per street frou:age,$0sq -- <�Y I \/I�/I•.- �,/ ft.20 foot height irliTlrc;tt_-----TI ''I 4 4_ /�.��`y/ J, !'.- 4. Temporary directional sign. [ANrA16N 6 I 4 6 4 16 6 16 I lb 6 see Sec.3 ,_____--..- .-._.I( _-- -_ _. S. 603 office ormejlrol shall 111d.K AI it,4:C 6 S 6 32 6 32 I_6 32 '6• • Comply with office regale- ----_- lions. IIMn,I.D.{KMrf:'.Al o I < 16 6 ,I)/ �." (Co',SiI,,N1 i 0.i 1 r 11Y`.I.D.rrdli C: -I _ l_ _ e. C•Reg District ffOiTi272v17.1 3. 6 u 11 6 I;- IR : I Sign rogue shall he sub- - � _.1._ Mitred and ro re.1 using PW d7 S12104 SIC', PICI Procedures. ,„,__ d. C•ileg see 6 C-Noy Dist/Arts TMRf Wit_,.. 1. hall signs-1:,:of salt area _oafiff D1Sa1K0$.FIC."._[_ot"P1-(11i113,C3:KRCIM MD ilari5171 no maximum. T. Freestanding sig., I per ( NOttAkt rOa1K.F ot e'a doiNO (T Orr:Ds- i princ:pn ^.tla.te p•r.,pert' - t- frontage,rt sync f P.sett, TYPC ENO u:n.f0ca ," �� I 36 sgft inn Fig„if nore.tna OF 4,./ / to / 4, O / a.e permitted. Step.brand.I OWES PESPITrD ..I J_....-. .05 prir0.ate.. signs included yai1--., __••1 P Yi 3. Puop signs nest Tr part of y« gas gawp rocs-Standing 6,>nc 1 P T P 6. Teruporary dirreti"ual signs: _-.-.___ __ ____. __�__...__- 1 _ refer to Sec. I. IMlc 5er at r• _._. S. Reslraom signs.'emitted, D_l lice'9 _ 7 1 _..._._ aJ Zetuirl,1 0 tern, 2 _ 1 -_ 1 7 re � e. Office District Kr inn. 1 - I _ 1 __-___ I I. idcntifteatirn Sign. 1 pre M I 2 2 Intl IJinl: .F0 oy It en Or ICnxnt -nc` _�0 Si;n I-I•l,n'nt n.tali" a.t:on es✓ Fri-c-St_tding Mgr. I sigo AD soft nod 2nd n N/r.r• D p t.l ... to second si lee I Sir, i )i1. - f P. si Y 6 axC 1 11 &axiom,l:FC r 4 signwall not x .pit a 'I ii �I . I i.,1. i l t I CIDI AL!".6 t•I. 3. per Idiot f In• I (I 11(6 I , , per deeclopo-t, MI•411. a. Maxims relight h ft &•II • S. D{rect. '1 r,I l :p•.rury _-. rr1 .I pl i'. I I i� I 1 1` 1 I tO, IS. sign P S 1. is I IL , t , a 1.+.. ::'.1::' I I I Pistil Scutt... -'I I 1.I 1 0 I',I I I 1 I'• 1• 2 I' f, tn.l,.t 11 1 11.1 I'1 U to t ( I ' I 4 '.I t (, f t 4I.• I. III '1 /, 1) (I dt)1 1 1 I :'•I I ''I l l I rti Su Id r A It ph..I wall sire per I ti 113111 1,.1; Co.,'I I II I :t.I 1 to 1 , I10 ir:-I- fo .,II .pat . ,xd � , J �1 ar l`rr So 111 for 4,11h 2. Area 1 t'I 1C.Iti. •I1,11. I Inn& per 1 1 .,t arr. ......... 3. Ktvir•ots taught n I,,r, rw./...- ---,- t Ir,a•.. ,gyro-. I - -_._ 4. Ili or.1 1r4r41 :.cal',,ap•.r,ary rigor anti tt.ttlt il•n •1:, a 6..1•, et I.,.. •1,•II 1a u ti. stirred refer to.,.,. t. I,.r tn.•Ire .1 redo,rot I ool,to i.ter ., g. Sector I•1•oat if, at r Stem- 'r'n ar t l.i a n rr. ...I n .I.t Ile• w V tgF1„/ Ik•mtllr.l•,tlrrmi l)•appr..,1 I,rr .1+r,.r t'I,..,r t ....,,1",1,+1,.•1. AI)h.•l.,tt•.�.r.d.,11.,1 li.,:rt�!.r, la Irrt, ,nln at,.+.Pre In h. edit nr...irh.ul i.r l At,' tyw'"r.•l. '.I rtr i4c pro,r.tott Itt L....ill,- Im 'fit,...0 env,.,1 elm.. ,r I.tic I. 1•11:,d&rid..1'I.r.,...1 n, r ity, I _ y18s' • TO: Roger K. Itlsead,City Manager P5ON: Dice Mon",Claming Director • DATE: Kay 26. 1977 CfoPARf5t04 OF SUNORDINANCE a 2h1 AND SUN ORDINANCE.COMM111rh DRAFT ORD1NM1lT e741 provisions gmerit1 SIM ORDINANCE.COSNt7T131 DRAFT Provisions MANGE OR DIFFERENCE. Section 1 Mrrppoe andd lntgne e Encourages rrentivr design while protecting the Shorter terfstat�vts ifncrC1tive vei design,gn,and henIth.safety I.fety I. �D inlmo in refconeise restriction,than span • public health. safety and control•,liar,. pro language is s,reshot'•flowery in describing an basis tar sign ordinance and males New ordinance 1261 3. eofCO Ord. d.aIll.ed riteson Guide 14.an. the purpose of the ordinance. a section of Ord, 0I3S,Section 14. Section II IMfinitlons_ Definition section is not in alphabetical Iiefinitlee scctiol is iii alphabetical order. Many more 1. Twine as any terms areinclydedin- order. A shore section winch does not define ten using a s arc defined.70 in all. lon 011 or accepted e."terms used in signage restew, 36 defin- 2. Most dcflni tfona seen cooler to likes are listed. understand 1n the SOCD vs.Ord.e261. Section Ill General Provisions-a:l Eislelets General Provisions Section outline: This section has 20 do's and don't's thnt regn- 3.1 General Ordinance 1241 was not organised,lead late signage In all dietrlets. The rroulaeiou 3.1.'.Permitted Signs Whereas the draft ordinance permits restrict signs that rho,,'),,color,not to..intro- 3.1.3 Prohibited Sigma easy reference. Some maw signs are fare with traffic,no bonnet's,sean,.rds fur 3.1.4 Fife type regulations,canopy awning,other signs explained c insthetdd In ordinancethat campaign signs. trmrorary rcoI estate signs, 3.1.7 special,,,,,,,,,,,,b.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,b.,,,,,,,,,signagr progren were n t directional signs,etc. I ,c any runner 3.2 Construction specs Section III is not orp.ani zed + 3.2.2 3413i!tall peen • that elites easy referrnct• 3.2.3 Plastic enlist run ion 3,2.4 Mehl construction ee Section V Administration and Inforct_nt a. pern,l a s-needed for ell signs Same order as Ord. 1261,some changes in conditinne,fees, Very little change in draft aca onlina . b. fees prornhner. The variance preens,old rea rs for ginl;variances areclearly!tared o d. sign idontificae inn tag ram would permit npprovalof var.."reyu.• e. men oaint i.,,,and rive, I. roil%m.o.sifn•. 2. porn tr i•.s 3. spec:.Ii tl,nx+gb the loomed of dppr0ls WO Aljn.l w.+0, 4. variance prmi•.ions Srrl ion VI N.,i.tnnf arming tit rn_._ a,2 L•d,1 h.,n- m,l urm.ng 5,gas a. Tolitaar.ary^ , , ...ply with r.rdinnnrn I.nil one oil r.. >I191'.may he granted a riot if limy Legal nut.rnforming slto poundal"an, . u ra , t r r Ilny.xy,t tom.i Il,.s r n1 iw.,,w r. more(Pali'.11. Ihan lbn.,r wl 14,1,•241 al.,oal i.e,l,,'e'.,,,.c,r r 'I ,. •, , it,., •..1, rlx• by rm.,rni:in,: fe,:a1 n• ennia,winr.nit' I. f,, ant..,•/,.,. well,vAl.d p,.ail Lt.. 'mk•It... ll�a.a Leal. I• x,l I,.a,un 'fnl'.". am) II,,.Cr a,w:l iaua;fur. fat f„/11lr,•L, �n 1 r, n n It ,wpl,tn,,.�+halt b.�1.,ary;l,l Inln r wpl lane, 1n•will ilk)! n•wu:e, ,h+ rl.' •ry.ga la mete Iuei u, t•n.nnl1n tlon.lnrd,of no.l. 12r.1 • • d MEMO ., i TO: Mayor $ City Council FROM: Dick Putnam, Planning Director Don Brauer, Planning Consultant THROUGH: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager DATE: June 17, 1977 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONS ON METRO SYSTEM STATEMENT • Mr. Brauer and the City staff have reviewed the April 14, 1977 Final Draft Metropolitan System Statement for Eden Prairie. We have discussed the pro- 6 visions of the System Statment with the Metro Council staff, Metro Airport : Commission staff, County $ State Highway Departments and City advisory 1 commissions. Copies 1of the System Statement have been distributed to the City Council, Planning Commission and Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources 1 Commission for review and comment. The staff/consultant prepared a summary of questions pertaining to the System Statement dated June 9, 1977. The Metro Council staff is preparing an amendment to the System Statement that reflects many of the specific concerns included in the June 9, 1977 memo. i SYSTEM STATEMENT PURPOSE The Metro System Statment is a requirement of the State Mandatory Planning Act directory the Metro Council prepare a statement which outlines adopted Metropolitan System plans in four specific areas: transportation, airports, waste management and recreation/open space. The System Statement summarizes j Metro policies and plans which affect regional systems within or serving I Eden Prairie. For example, under the transportation section the System 1 Statement only deals with regional transportation systems such as : I-494, U.S. 212/169, C.S.A.H. 62 and C.S.A.H. 18. Throughout the planning process the System Statement will be used as a reference for Metropolitan policies which Eden Prairie must take into account in formulating its community plan. Reconcilation Procedures The State law provides a formal process for resolving disagreements between communities and the Metro Council over System Statement content. The law does not allow the purpose of these procedures to be for discussion and debate of the need or reasonableness of the Metropolitan System plans or parts thereof. Rather, the Land Act reconcilation/substantiation process were intended to focus solely on reviewing and modifying the the Council's specific application or interpretation of the Metropolitan System plan to a particular community or school district." 1 1Metropolitan System Statement Reconcilation Procedure, approved by LUAC 4/20/77 and Metro Council 4/28/77 1 Memo-Recommendations on Metro System Statement June 17, 1977 page 2 If the community wishes to challenge the System Statement's interpretation of Metropolitan policies, then the City must transmit a resolution to the Metro Council requesting reconcilation procedure. The City has 60 days to review the System Statment and request reconcilation or the System Statement stands approved. The City in filing for reconcilation may ask to conduct its appeal before the Land Use Advisory Committee, a Metro Council Committee, or by the State Office of Hearing Examiners. CONSULTANT/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff/consultant recommends that the City Council accept the Metropolitan System Statement as a basis for consideration of those regional systems out- lined in the April 14, 1977 document with forthcoming amendments concerning C.S.A.H. 18 South of I-494 and local crossings of freeways. DP,DB:jj • ggg0 t� METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101 •"�•- COMMUNITY GRANT APPLICATION 7. Name of Community City of Eden Prairie 2. Name of Local Contact Person Richard Putnam. Plannine Director Telephone Number 941-7262 9. Murk Program Outline the major tasks and the total costs of those tasks which must be undertaken in order to prepare or update the community's comprehensive plan according to its systems statement,and prepare and adopt its Official Controls.The outline should follow the • format sheen on the back pi this application form. • See back of application form • 4. Completion Date Estimated completion elate of the Work Program Tasks I-III 17/31/77 Task IV 6/31/78 6. Previous Planning • • Indicate whether this work program reflects the cost of updating a previously prepared plan and,if so,describe to what extent the plan(s)will be utilized in developing the community's Comprehensive Plan. Yes, the 1977 Guide Plan Update will revise the 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan and its amendments. 6. Outside Asslstenes List amounts and sources of outside assistance. None • 7. Special Fund Dements If the community wishes to xppty for a portion of the Special Fund:it)describe the existing or proposed metropolitan feature or activity that exists with'n or near your co:.trnu.ury that increases the total cost to the community of preparing Or updating its comprehensive plan ri:lain/a TO Other COtnmuntties:(i)document a.best as possible how the feature or activity relates to the funding criteria IV C 3 of the Go calmest and how it increases your cost;and 13)state the amount requested and indicate where this amount is reflected in the work program major task cost estimates. See attached sheet Exhibit A 6. Grant Aeeountici Requested: a, Community Comprehensive Planning Fund entitlement $11.193 b. inventory Activity Fund entitlement $11/A c. Special Planning Ptnblems Funds runuested $ 5.000 __ ..,_ TOTAL.• $1k,1p3 •Total grant amount requested,plus assstanrc from the lalunties out al the County Assistance to Freestanding Growth Contort Fund or Inventory Actmsaes Fund,may nut eveeed 75':of the total cost of the work program,or the total cost to enrnnumly. 9. Aitsch o copy of the resolution by the overtime body transmitting this application. • Work Program Total Cost of Performed Major Tasks: Consultantb Major tiask: 1City. by: 2 I. Land Use Plan BrauerF,Assoc. (B/A) A. Inventory3 4,000 2,000 City Staff .(C/S) B. Development of 1 Policies and Plans: i 4 • 1. Lend Use 4,500 3,000 B/A C/S 2. Protection 3,000 2,500 ii ,t 3. Housing 2,000 1,500 II ,t i 4. Airport•retated considerations 2,500 2,000 II II II. Facilities Plan . A. Inventory3 2,000 1,500 " • II B. Development of Policies and Plans: 1. Transportation 1,500 2,000 If If 2. Sewer Policy 1,000 1,500 „ If _-_ 3. Parks and Open Space 3,000 3,000 " ,t III. Implementation Program 1 A. Inventory3 2,000 1,500 „ „ B. Development of Programs or Descriptions: 2,500 • 2,000 „ I, t. Official Controls 2. Capital Improvement 2,500 2,000 " of 3. Housing Implementation it „ 1,500 1,500 IV. Preparation and Adoption of Official Contrcls (estimate) 7,500 7,500 ,, r, _... Total Cost of Work Program 42,000 35,500 = 77,500 Outside Assistance entitlement 11,193 _ S.P.P. Discretionary Fund 5,000 _ 16,193 Cost to Community (1,307 'Includes all Costs defined as included in the total cost of the work program. 2Lead person(s),Firm(s)or agency Is)responsible for tf.s performance of the major tasks of the work program. If indefinite at present,provide your best estimation imp indicate trot his tentative. 3For communities that ere eligible for Inventory Activity Grant ontiflemeaft,sportily III the eligible activities 10 be unde,teken,and IN the cost to all.torumun,IV. //esYO CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 77-88 • RESOLUTION REQUESTING FUNDS FROM THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has received the Metropolitan System Statement dated April 14, 1977, and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared a Community Grant Applica- tion as prescribed by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eden Prairie transmits the Community Comprehensive Planning Fund entitlement grant request for $11,193 and Special Planning Problems Fund grant request for $5,000. ADOPTED this day of , 1977. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL a �f 8 90.0 SPECIAL FUNDS REQUEST SPECIAL PLANNING PROBLEMS DISCRETIONARY FUNDS 1. Allocation Amount Policy Area Eden Prairie's request is for a portion of $7,027 available to developing fringe communities. 2. Eligibility Eden Prairie is classified as a developing fringe community eligible for Special Planning Problems Discretionary Fund Grant. } • E 3. Funding Criteria A. Nature of Metropolitan feature or acitivity. The City has identified a nine square mile area that has special planning problems created by Metropolitan facilities which include the following nine Metropolitan Features . -Flying Cloud Airport -Metropolitan Urban Service Boundary ( MUSA ) 1. Urban Service area 2. Rural Service area -Hennepin County Vocational Technical School -US 212/169 Highway -Purgatory Creek Regional Trail Corridor -Minnesota River Federal Wildlife Refuge -Hennepin County/Flying Cloud Landfill -Staring Lake Community Park ( LAWCON Project ) -Cedar Hills Golf/Ski Area ( prmposed community/regional recreational site) Location of these Metropolitan Features in close proximity to each other create unique inter-relationships that must be coordinated with regional and community planning objectives. B. Uniqueness of Features The Metropolitan features located within this area if considered one by one would certainly qualify as unique , however, what distinguishes Eden Prairie's Special Planning Area from other locations which might experience impacts from Metropolitan features is the concentration and inter-relationships of those systems. Special planning problems result in integrating these features with each other and the surrounding community. • page 2 C. Location of Metropolitan Feature ti The nine square mile area identified in Figure 1 is the Special Planning Area in Eden Prairie. D. Availability of other Assistance Planning funds for the study of the relationships between Metropolitan features located in this area are only available through the Metro- politan Planning Assistance Act. Special Planning Studies for Flying Cloud, US 169/212, the Federal Wildlife Refuge or open space planning may be available to other responsible agencies. The City feels that planning for the total system must be done if each of these major Metropolitan Features is to successfully relate to the community and policies of the Metropolitan Development Guide. E. Previous Actions which impact the Metropolitan Features The following decisions have greatly influenced planning for this area with Eden Prairie: 1. adoption by Congress of the Minnesota River Wildlife Refuge ( located around Grass Lake, Rice Lake and Minnesota River ). 2. the existing Metropolitan Development Guide Airport System Plan and Master Plan Study by MAC of Flying Cloud Airport. 3. closing of Minnesota River bridges and increased traffic on existing US 169/212. • 4. location/timing of new US 212. S. adoption of the Metropolitan Open Space System Plan and the designation of Purgatory Creek as a regional trail corridor. 6. approval of Flying Cloud Landfill site as a county I disposal area. Recent Legislation making landfills tax exempt under the Pollution Control Standards and the restrictions on future use of landfill sites are issues to he considered. 7. location of south Campus of Hennepin County Vocational Technical School adjacent to Flying Cloud Airport and- served by existing US 169/212. The Vo-tec's relation- ship to community and regional recreation resources • creates a joint use potential. 8. the location and purchase of community and regional recreation facilities such as Staring Lake Park and potential for Cedar Hills Recreation Area. 9. the MUSA line divides the area into urban and rural service areas creating special problems. 10. successfully integrating these Metropolitan facilities and their related impacts with surrounding low density housing areas. 11. development of Major Center Area (MCA )-a regional diversified center adjacent to this area. 12. wildlife corridor linkage at Anderson Lakes Regional Park to Purgatory Creek is critical to the functioning of the nature center concept. . . . r • , , , . . i ' • ; I: •- : 0 1 rl. 1. ,• 1 , ,# ,-1 \ •/ , ...-. . \ t )r'.. ,,' ,... ";,,q, t -' i • ‘ ,,,, It .1,.1..r.4' 1 A. 1 \ 1 •I- et,,'% ,, 1. • it , t II,i --, I t "7%, i ..'• ',/ I‘4'I •1 'I a ;,' „ . • ,,.. t 1. ::;'''''LI..1,\.,V ,1! '.• ''... \',.. ,:t.N.is L [1 ' -.-1 I'l ' (• , c,,. -; -1.' ;,. •• ,, •••• i i- si I • , .,; ; t.•r. '...-'j''.---) ., - 'r;' S4,!y'r, i I 1 Ir.I I''''',,,O.I, •t 1 \ '':t .4 ; • -.:- 'I* •-•‘• 1 '' ..., .i:'.......'i /.,. ..., :•• - „•--, • ••.i i.'" : . . :.,.,,; . -, .; - -1 ..i,..7..7 ...,'..' . •--.---; '' I ,' I ,,,,,,., i....,,,.1.„,....„,.•,„. : , , , , • ,.. ,--zi . ,,,,,,,,,,,..z. - __i ‘,...,.,i...,,,?., \ . ,,, .---,,,,- ..:, ,:,,, . ... ..,....,\ ; ,',..,-.771. • - ti.,,-7,',,„.`,\ ' ,.. ;.-7 --.- • ::.';':;j-.: : • .... i . ! .-',73.v.t,':, . -- -,,,,,..;•.:.....!,,..,,...\ ...'.. •1 '•.'-' ',----Ai. I,.,•'•i 1 1..i1.11. ..• II.'l:•'.. '..' '.,,;••i'.3..0 • .. iii.j..1''I''•.A: ("\%,• ',. ,) ,; -. ' ' .., 1'.tI, ••I; , .......,4/ I j •.I. . .i • .‘',.",: '.. , 1‘ 1 1)) ,.. ., ‘,))..., 1 VC-'.- •• i '...I i /I '.• ' ,1 • .. ' 1 1 If':' :- "' ‘ '... - "I -.. I -.' 1 ' t V-,,,.7 „*,V, • I t•-•!•• .. •••- •1 ; : " it- • .... , '\ / • .!•*;•-• ' ' - . ' . L I t .„-• t, - , k:::- .. .'':'•.•• 1 j•7 ,,,, ...... .-. k.,i, ....--.-. v 7 -./ -41 -,) • ' II , ' 1: ,••••' . 7.:,•'.!.,..i.,•,1;,-._:_..:._-•;,‘---,1- , ‘. ..-..i t\--:, L ,,::::::.i....'.: _ : .J I , ,. i , , ma)or• ,• 1, C."' ; . center •,,-.,-,,"•A.,:i:,,,. ..,,,,,,,,,,• /, •e,..,. I - I ,•....41.2 L.....--J •l.. - tf.. 4-' r , y"."- :. --10.01.-....:G ,:i 1 L, •,,, ../(\:: , \_....) ' - , --- ipurc;a2,--Tv .. ‘7 / _'. — . , • ..r 1 v-- , - .- ---.' • . '.. ' 1 . It '2.1.. `. •'. Pn.. ), 3 /LI , 4,i'•f::.:4 ..., 'res-,,,,,,,i,,,,, 0 (...,:::,...;:- - , •.„,fr.;.,•,, 1. ; ::,-.., \ .,-„,NN a ,,, t F, _ A:.7.7.-,,_,:.:•"-_,,,,_:•? — .. tra'.1 t„„A : «,;.,,i, -,..,,•,,, . ii,v.:,,77,, .. 1: , ...-,1, ,', ..,,,:„..,,, , _ ,. :,,,,....,..:....-:',,h••• a. •• . 0 LI , , /'1\ 0 01 .. '..,, •:.;', :111: •, ' ` • • ?.:.,s••1, CI El ,, ° -• -#r, .2,%, '- 1-;•,, ,, ••:,,,-c ,• :-.-1- a • _, ,„....;.....---.--„..,..,,,,4 'y..1, -- . • 1 -..i•-•'...- - a / 11.1 .1(1:,4:.......:7..i T..,,,i, , -ics.":. " ''.7,..7:,.lir.7cielli ,/,„,, ..-. '•,, ,,,Sc 2,:-'„, s',.,.,--.,, NIP O'Gi '1 ;- • ...':'''''',. .'--, - '• rr.:23."-`-::::-.;:;', ' 4, . --,,,,,,..._ .,/ ,., •c-'-c-- _, .. "; i , -J... , • ::',------,-, 4,-<.'' ,''.• E.a- - • . '••• -'• -.-...\,.... 7..:-;.,,,_ k.,;,--'.,0.e. - - .P0.4,i'e(4-,.) ,, ',, '. I 7,1 .. '•:,:, . . 11 f.,..„j - "-,-,.:‘.-, , \,,1 ,5,- ';:,,,,,. 1, 1 \ ,‘ . - ... ' -- - "••• '" - , r.'Lt.:• , : . c,Tiz, ,i 1 : 1:13 \ -1.ccid7'..r..--'.- 1...'-';2 airPOr(: . - '-,'' ' ; 1.-i:,''''•!4...'"'''• ' 1 , r, -. -. . :., t, „ _ - ,',/ ••••'()- ,: 72".i ; ' '11 il I 0- -- •,' . . , ii ,„...,....-- .:..r,4, : 4 c:, ...,-,,..n ....,........; . . --- - •f3tedl ' , ' • . •' I 3 / ..,...•(..- . 1 I • r•P‘.. '''' , / .., ' • 4 : .1 t 1 tatidrill : c'o- ' ,1 : clue.i ....-*‘,:,,:. 1. i . • . ".... ''' '.;;, '' '‘;1" ''''''' .-‘-'"Nr.. .......". ".'- ‘../' •?L''Lirturn.ittliap. ,-.., '',Ii`lA • ', ' ' !... '',, I i - <s, ---..! ''• - 1 1 . , n'Ynn .so17.1 rf,,,,;-?r ..... ,:, ..--, \'-'-'7-!`,-,‘ ','-.. 1 ';'i-----•:'• wi:e.40 rciu;:e 1 \-, .., 1 ---- .--r-,. ,.., ,..„, l , r : • . ,./ . : 1 S'.: i 7 • • . 4.0), T 1 T:.:s:‘ /,' r•,..-:2'.",",„N L.,..., •••,/ ..•'' \ !.:.•- -..--( :--- ; , — ,- ,•--', , .• • • . •-•:::„..t ', :.,-,--' . . . -......_.z.„-- i I «, , 1 r.,.."01„ r10.e5,,,-..-1 I! '-,..-'-• '..04-4'''''''''''''.1' I.''"• ' li l,_. ' ii - ' Al". ..... ,, , qg'fo & • MEMORANDUM_ TO: Mayor and City Council 1 THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City planager FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services A•J• SUBJECT: Recommendation from the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission for a Water Quality Study at Round Lake DATE: June 17, 1977 During the course of the spring several members of the Parks, Recreation { and Natural Resources Commission have mentioned the status of the water 1 quality at Round Lake as it relates to the recreational swimming and public beach. As a result of this inquiry, .we scheduled Mr. Al Gebhardt, Engineer for the Riley/Purgatory Creek Watershed District, to appear at a commission meeting and discuss Round Lake,water quality. Mr. Gebhardt reported the following data from the Watershed District Water Quality Inventory of 1975. Table I Water Quality Indicator 1972 1975 Mean Chlorophyll (mg/m3) 5 15 Mean Total Phosphorus (pg/1) 25 66 Mean Secchi disc (feet) 15.8 7.5 (Sec definition on page 2) As you can see from the table the water quality has decreased significantly over this short time span. Increased algae bloom and increased growth of aquatic vegetation are the results of the addition of phosphorus to the water. The possible reasons for this additional phosphorus could be: I. Urban runoff. 2. Agricultural practices within the watershed. 3. Swimmers. • It is important that each of these potential causes be analyzed to determine the extent to which each contributes to the increased phosphorus. Once these sources arc identified and measured a recommended plan of action could be established for improving the quality of the lake. The annual swimmers itch problem may or may not be a part of the recommended solution. I/61 I • Water Quality -2- June 10/77 From a eutrophic standpoint Round Lake is still one of the best lakes in the metropolitan area (quote from Al Gebhard). However, the water quality has deteriorated since 1972. The deteriorating water quality together with the planned recreational uses of Round Lake are cause for concern and an attempt should be made to resolve the conflict there. RECOMMENDATION Based on the information presented at the meeting the Parks and Recreation Commission took the following action: MOTION: "Garens moved that we recommend to the Council to undertake a detailed study to preserve the water quality in Round Lake to insure it as a recreational swimming area. Kingrey seconded. Motion carried unanimously". • • DEFINITION OF WATER QUALITY INDICATOR 1. Mean total Phosphorus is the amount of phorphorus nutrient in the water. It is this element which makes the algae and week growth increase and which influences the other indicators. 2. Mean Chlorophyll is the green coloring in the water which is a part of the algae growth caused by the phosphorus. 3. Secchi disc reading measures the transparency of the water. This is a disc which is placed in the water and the measurement is the point at which it can no longer be seen from above the surface of the lake. IIX'A • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services/0 , 1 SUBJECT: Recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission for proceeding with appraisals on certain neighborhood park sites DATE: June 17, 1977 On Monday, June 6, 1977 the Commission considered the heed to proceed to acquire certain neighborhood park sites utilizing the CASH PARK FEE revenues being realized from development in their service areas. There are currently four areas of the community where CASH PARK FEE revenue receipts are substantial and would apparently permit us to enter into contracts for deed for purchase of the land identified for neighborhood park uses. These are: . Hidden Ponds . Franlo and Co. Road 1 . Red Rock - . Topview The Commission recommends that appraisals be secured on all four of these sites with the total estimated cost $1,000. No other commitments would be made at this time and until the appraisals are received at which time the staff would negotiate with the property owner and agreement for consideration by the City Council. Q 93 • •F 1 MEMO T0: -Mayor Fenzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer • i SUBJECT: Bids for bituminous paver and roller, I.C. 51-307 The following is a summary of the sealed bids received on June 19, 1977, for a tow type bituminous paving machine and a static, steel drum type ' roller. DEDUCT FOR •• AWARD OF BID FOR BID FOR BOTH TO SAME NET BIDDER PAVER ROLLER COMPANY BID Road Machinery & Supp. (All Layton Equipment) $13,250 $11,320 $24,570 Model D550 Model 607W (none) $8,850 $7,100 $15,950 Model F-525 Model 607 used $8,400 $8,950 $17,350 Model H-500B Model 607 new (no augers) Hayden-Murphy $9,349 $12,250 $200 $21,399 Equip. Co. Miller Model Fergusen M5708A Model 35 Zeco Co. (no bid) $11,850 $11,850 Rex Model 5-8 (roller only) $12,432 $12,432 Hyster Model (roller only) C330A The Layton Model F-525 from Road Machinery Supplies Co. and the Miller Model M5708A from Hayden Murphy Equipment Co. are essentially equal in quality and performande capabilities. The Model H-500B has no augers for proper feed of the bituminous mix when paving wider than 9' and the Model D550 is a machine too sophisticated in the controls for our needs. • y�J� - 2 - The bid specification did provide for a used roller as bid by Road Mach- inery & Supplies. We have inspected and road tested this machine and believe it will meet our needs quite well. This Mode1607 roller has a 28 h.p. water cooled engine as specified. However, all of the other rollers bid are 3 to 5 ton rollers and are more machine than our needs warrant. It is recommended that the City Council accept the bid from Road Machin- ery and Supplies Co. in the total amount of $15,950 for one new Layton Model F-525 paving machine at $8,850 and one used Layton Model 607 roller • at $7,100. Sufficient monies have been allocated in the 1977 City Budget under capital improvements to cover these purchases. CJJ:kh June 14, 1977 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 77-87 RESOLUTION RECEIVING REVISED FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A HEARING (I.C. 51-270) WHEREAS, a revised feasibility report dated June 14. 1977, has been given by the City Engineer to the City Council on June 14, 1977. recommending the following improvements to wit: I.C. 51-270.Construction of street improvements on Scenic Heights Road, including curb and gutter, storm sewer, sidewalk, bituminous surfacing, sanitary service and watermain stubs. The project limits extend on Scenic Heights Road from Mitchell Road to County Road 4 (Eden Prairie Road) and on Mitchell Road from Scenic Heights Road to 250 feet south. Also bene- fitting are Lots 1-6, Block 3, Lots 1-4, Block 4 and Lots 1-4, Block 5, Hipp's Mitchell Heights First Addition. The total estimated project cost is $496,100. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by.the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Sect. 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 19th day of July, 1977, at 7:00 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Hall. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 109� Revised 6/14/77 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAILWAY ON SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD FROM MIT- CHELL ROAD TO CO. ROAD 4 I.C. 51-270 Prepared by: Brauer & Assoc., Inc. Eden Prairie, Minn. • Approved and forwarded for City Council consideration: 4 Carl J. lie, P.E. Director of Public Works Reg. No. 9323 t 1 FEASIBILITY REPORT ON PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD I.C. 51-270 1. INTRODUCTION This report examines the feasibility of street construction and a bi- tuminous walkway along Scenic Heights Road. 2. AUTHORITY FOR STUDY Brauer & Associates, Inc. was retained by the City of Eden Prairie to undertake a feasibility study of the proposed improvements of the above mentioned area. Authorization to proceed was issued in a letter dated December 11, 1974, from Mr. Carl Jullie. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND COSTS • The general location of the proposed improvements is shown on Plat la attached to this report. III The scope of the work proposed involved construction of improvements to the existing Scenic Heights Roadway surface including minimum grading and widening to a 46 foot width, construction of bituminous "deep strength" hose and surface, installation of concrete curb and gutter and construc- tion of required storm drainage facilities from the intersection ofMit- chell Road to the intersection of Red Rock Road and on Mitchell Road from the intersection of Scenic Heights Raod, south 250 feet to meet the existing upgraded roadway. Temporary connections will be constructed on Scenic Heights Road from Red Rock Road westerly 300 feet and on Mitchell Road north of Scenic Heights Road. An eight foot wide bitumi- nous walk will be constructed from County Road 4 to Mitchell Road. It is also proposed to overlay Scenic Heights Road from a point 300 feet; west of Red Rock Road to the intersection of County Road 4, The overlay involves construction of a paver laid, bituminous leveling course and wearing course over the existing roadway surface. A sanitary sewer and watermain crossing the intersection of Tamarack Trail with Scenic Heights Road is proposed for future development of Parcel. 5680. The proposed street width and structural sections are shown on Plate 4, page 7 of this report. The design is based upon estimated traffic vol- ume, soil conditions and NSA standard requirements. The 8' wide bitumi- nous sidewalk-will be located on the southerly side of the right-of-way for Mitchell Read to School Road and on the northerly side from there to County Road 4. • - 1 - (n' O • The estimated cost for the proposed improvements breaks down as follows: $339,900 46' Permanent roadway from Mitchell Road to Red Rock Road • 45,850 Bituminous overlay from Red Rock Road to Co. Road 4 74,550 8' Bituminous walkway 2,800 Sewer and water service for Parcel 5680 33,000 Right-of-way $496,100 Total estimated cost These estimated costs include 15% engineering, 9% City engineering and administrative costs and 2% for temporary financing. 4. ASSESSMENT OF COSTS The City's Special Assessment Policies (Rev. 4/6/76) indicate the follow- • I ing assessment procedure for MSA streets: Single family detached properties shall be charged the rate representing the cost of a typical residential street. This rate shall be $2,300 per lot, including storm sewer. A 25% credit shall be applied to those lots platted prior to adoption of the City's Compre- hensive Guide Plan. $23 per foot for unplatted, low density residential property $26 per foot for medium density (RM 6.5) residential property $30 per foot for high density (RM 2.5) residential property $35 per foot for commercial/industrial office property The properties abutting the portion of roadway receiving the bituminous overlay only would be assessed the rate of $2.50 per foot. This is an updated rate based upon the $2.33 per foot rate assessed in 1976 for similar improvements on Mitchell Road and Riley Lake Road. Portions of these properties that are low and swampy have been deleted from the total front footage. • The total cost of the sewer and water stubs will be assessed to Parcel 5680. The attached preliminary assessment roll (page 8 ) lists the parcels involved, ownership, footages and respective amounts proposed to be assosed. - 2 - i The City's MSA share is 406,399. There are sufficient monies in the City's MSA Construction Fund to cover this amount. The front footage of • Lot 1, Block 6, Hipps Mitchell Heights Addition (4201) has been assigned in equal portions to the 14 townhouses on Blocks 3, 4 and 5 of said ad- dition. 5. •PROJECT SCHEDULE• It is recommended to proceed with the proposed improvements under the following schedule: Council receives revised feasibility study June 21, 1977 and sets public hearing date Mail hearing notice'to newspaper June 30, 1977 (publish 7/7 and 7/14) Mail hearing notice to property owners July 1, 1977 • Public hearing July 19, 1977 • Approve plans and specifications August 2, 1977 and order advertisement of bids • Mail notice to Construction Bulletin•; August 5, 1977 • and newspaper` Receive Bids Sept. 2, 1977 Award Contract Sept. 6, 1977 Special Assessment hearing Sept. 20, 1977 Assessments payable 1978 6. FEASIBILITY Improvement Contract I.C. 51-270 as proposed herein is feasible and will result in a benefit to the properties proposed to be assessed. - 3 - ya0° ow • • 102• • , ) . �` g,` 1. j !+ '/' -.. . . _. ... - ' 4 tb'..fi4? -♦ 4 ! i -.. _. - - _. s • �e 1", -sit _ • ! SGGwIc. NEIt'NT5 RD _ • •-r-•SED EAST-WEST . �%4 iMLAtELL �. •^. _ - PARKWAY • !'�' t'•. . - „, 4111411\ • L. .. .1 ...,,., to .a l`.` %RED ROCK - - STARRING • NO y' • • • • L______i j>. . . . • . . , i . . , L___ ........ ....„.. . ~'''.........,, ,b9 Al . 212 / ' • ( BRADER a ASSOC ANSIE • PLATE IA 6440 f CLOUD 00w SITE .LOCATION - 4 �r�o( E, WU § I — 0 V08 MN 113 N011N Q :. ,,, . < O z3.- ..... . c d2 .. a o c • M '----- \ 2 10 •� 11Vt11 K3vamvi a I I I J e�a{{ II 00 1 W 5 i i.. m- 1 u sI 1 t xM .� fa x d — t tr2 1 1 %% M ; -f N s .4._—LL_ ----- ---------- --- �� 3M13AV VHIVMVIH ?—T 7— 1 N /1 -1 N i M �,1 1 20 i v / MB I i1 ' f H 1: L1 \----r--1-�---- • O I i , 1 I m W 1 O NI - 1 - f= 1 2 a- la 1 / L L f..J I 1 3fIN3AV NVOItI3HS H IL 1 1 1 1 i - — 1 NI K11 a 'e N t 1 f,. x W II I i W 11 $ O - r1 a' I in Nf$ x W al r W Z� 1 ✓ Z 1 � �'=J_�1_ � o f $ W • 3A180 301S111H % 41 U) _ n 1 t v -1r►�—.— --T 3 !rt¢ —�— Hi - 1 N f , ) 1 U JO _f I Y g11 4 I • tv 1/ S h i 1 fa „ --L_ ------k--c-• _\^a ♦ 0votl k00 t 032E V \\ \\ - I —-t- • • \ c+\a• $ !... • eD--I i \ s) •• -". .. • of "1 1 1 ♦� \-7-1 C\ v `'\ -\ g+ I o 7A \ t , \ ,e. ......1 # ,.0 !- . \ .. , . \ .13., # ct -§ - . . s. P.:7•.. I 4' 1 1 \ 1)i a Or la ti; IC . , i ! li ..11 "f , ..1 ,, , 0 1 o• k f l z if ¢IC r' o , .....„ -., 4,.. , ...v.,. , _ . i, , , . a __ __________ s ' ,s .. . a IL_°_11._ ______ill _ °-_,A 1 .. If %L.. ..4e • ., ! . f / .� CV eJ k�8 lA dZ�y) Alt N--�_i F z to W C W I"- O Q F- W d O H G -_........-_____ N A. . 2 u .z `W U N C Co N of C . O _ • b 0 Ii 7 / t b gym.— � 01.- O r o 1! A 1 N n o o I 'l;b3 - - EXISTING ROADWAY VAR.25'+ Iy2"-2341 • 11 LEVELING COURSE EXIST. 81T. hurr TEMPORARY STREET • • . 5 le• 23. 5. MITCHELL RD. SCENIC HTS RD. x 3"-2341 ,immera..1 2 x 7 -2331 8-618 CONCRETE C&G 4-CL.2 AGG. PERMANENT STREET PLATE 4 TYPICAL SECTION . BRAVER a ASSOCIATES.WG PLANNERS • 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 5 343 - 7 - ti3014 I.C. 51-270 Rev. 6/14/77 TABLE I - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessable Permanent Bituminous Owner 1976 Tax footage Street Overlay Total BlOck Lot or Parcel Statement or Units Rate Amount Amount Assessment -- 5680 Warren Schultz 1,272' $26 33,072 •-a- 35,872 * 3 1 Outlot "A" Hipp's Construction 564' 26 .14,664 -0- 14,664 -- 4500 Newtown Development . 250' 26 6,500 ' -0- 6,500 -- 410 & 425 M.E. Church 3 units 1,725 5,175** -0- 5,175 -- 860 John Liepke 1 unit 1,725 1,725** -0- 1,725 ! -- 2015 Ethyl Wokasch 1 unit 1,725 1,725** -0- 1,725 i --Sec. 16 2410 Ind. Sch. Dist. 272 1,650' 2.50 -0- 4;125 4,125 -- 2325 Laurette D. Pidcock 900' 2.50 -0- 2,250 2,250 -- 2451 Joseph Nechas 1,350' • 2.50 -0- 2,7.00 3_7i- 2,700 -- 2090 .C. C. Miller 1,300' 2.50 -0- 3,250 3,250 • -- 2050 Henry J. Bach 1nO' 2.50 -0- 250 250 RLS 136 (B) Doug Schmidt 218' 2.50 -0- 545 545 3 1 Harvey R. Kunstman 30' 2- 6 780 -0- 780 3 2 Robert Aycock 30' 26 780 -0- 780 3 3 Harold A. King 30' 2- 6 . 780 -0- 780 3 4 Harold R. Atkins 30' 26 780 -0- 780 3 5 JoAnne M. Wilson 30' 26 780 -0- 780 • 3 6 Eugene A. Roepke 30' 2- 6 '780 -0- 780 4 1 Louis A. Borms 30' 2- 6 780 -0- 780 4 2 Joseph G. Rollins 30' 26 780 -0- 780 4 3 Mike Harling 30' 26 780 -0- 780 4 4 Dennis S. Medd 30' 2- 6 780 -0- 780 5 1 Charles Conover 30' 26 780 -0- 780 5 2 Dominick J. Londino 30 26 780 -0- 780 5 3 Tom Yates 30' 26 780 -0- 780 . 5 4 Joseph L. Okun 30 26 780 -0- 780 City of Eden Prairie 373,669 32,730 406,399 • Includes $2800 for sewer and water TOTALS 447,450 45,850 496,100 ** Reflects 25% credit - 8 - I.;1 I J • City of Eden Prairie NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS ' I.C. 51-�70 SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Eden Prairie City Council will meet at the City Hall Council Chambers, 8950 Eden Prairie Road at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July'19 ., 19 77 , to consider the making of the follow- • ing described improvements. I.C. 51-270, Construction of street improvements on Scenic Heights Road, including curb and gutter, storm sewer, sidewalk, bituminous sur- facing, sanitary service and watermain stubs. The project limits extend on Scenic Heights Road from Mitchell Road to County Road 4 (Eden Prairie Road) and on Mitchell Road from Scenic Heights Road to 250 feet south. Also benefitting are Lots 1-6, Block 3, Lots 1=4, Block 4 and Lots 1-4, Block S, Eipp's MItchell Heights First Addition. The total estimated project cost is $496,100. pursuant to Minnesota State laws Section 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvements is all that property within or abutting on the above described limits. Written or oral comments relating to the proposed improvements will be received at this meeging. Publish: ' By Order of the City Council Kathy Hermann, Deputy City Clerk and 19_ City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road, 55343 • • • • - 9 - yJO • MEMO i TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council FROM: Roger Ulstad, City Manager DATE: May 11, 1977 SUBJECT: MWCC Reserve Capacity Charges to Eden Prairie for 1971 and 1972 1 As the City Council is aware, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) has assigned to the City of Eden Prairie a total charge of $1,643,587 for deferred costs relating to reserved capacity in metro fE interceptor sewer pipes and treatment works for the years 1971 and 1972. This amount breaks down as follows: Interest Principal thru 9/1/78 Total 1971 664,221 254,688 918,909 1972 555,581 169,097 724,678 1,219,802 423,785 1,643,587 In 1973 the service availablity charge ;SAC) became effective, thus dis- continuing the old method of cost allocation. However, the SAC method was not retroactive to the years 1971 and 1972, and now the MWCC is pressing hard for an agreement with the City for the debt repayment. Through communications dated March 2 and April 26, 1976, Mr. Richard Dougherty, the Chief Administrator of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, summarized the reserve capacity charges and suggested that if a method of repayment could not be resolved by October 1, 1976, it could be necessary to levy a tax against the City of Eden Prairie through the Metropolitan Council. Subsequently, in May of 1976 the City Council authorized a report by the consulting firm of Schoell and Madsen, Inc., to review the 1971-72 reserve capacity charge method of allocation. This report was completed in August of 1976 and formed the basis of our appeal to the MWCC Staff that said method of allocation was substantially in- equitable to the City of Eden Prairie. On September 15, 1976, Mr. Dougherty informed us by letter that since we were making a sincere effort to study and resolve the repayment problem, the Commission concurred with our request to withold a tax levy for 1977. Over the next several months we conferred with the MWCC Staff, including Mr. Dougherty, Mr. Anthony Ceneri and also Mrs. Ruth Hustad, the District 4 representative on the Waste Control Commission. In a letter dated April 5, 1977, Mr. Ceneri summarily rejected the purposa/and conclusions of the Schocll and Madsen report. The results of our efforts seem to he an impli- cation that the best settlement the City can expect is a forgiveness of the deferred interest charge and a 30 year repayment scheme for the origi- 446"7 • - 2 - 1r nal principal plus interest on the unpaid balance from the present until the debt is repaid. At this point we are recommending that the Council consider a repayment plan which would add a "surcharge". to the SAC payment, ranging from $40 to $215 per unit over the next 30 years as shown on the attached memo from Mr. Franc. This would be an appropriate method since the charge is for capacity reserve for future users. The addition of 600 SAC units per year is reasonable in view of current population forecasts and anticipated commercial industrial growth for Eden Prairie. Mr. Frane inidicates the present worth of the future payments will be $720,000. We are prepared to discuss the details of this memo and our repayment plan recommendation at the Council's convenience. CJJ:kh Attachment TO: ROGER ULSTAD FROM: JOHN D. FRANE RE: METRO WASTE DATE: May 4, 1977 This years SAC is $375. We could add 11% or $40/unit to this years SAC and increase the $40 by 0 per year rounded to the nearest $5. This schedule assumes 600 equivalent connections per year for 30 years: ADDITIONAL ADDITIONAL SAC SAC X 600 UNITS 1977 $ 40 $ 24,000 78 40 24,000 79 45 27,000 1980 50 30,000 81 50 30,000 82 • 55 33,000 83 • 55 33,000 84 60 36,000 85 65 39,000 86 70 42,000 87 70 42,000 88 75 45,000 89 80 48,000 1990 85 51,000 91 90 54,000 92 95 57,000 93 100 60,000 94 110 66,000 95 115 69,000 96 120 72,000 97 130 78,000 98 135 81,000 99 145 87,000 2000 155 91,000 01 160 96,000 02 170 102,000 03 180 108,000 04, 195 117,000 05 205 123,000 06 215 129,000 30 years $1,894,000 PRESENT VALUE $720,000.00 June 17, 1977 • STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 06-15-77 5989 PETTY CASH Reimburse City Hall fund 42.45 5990 INSTY PRINTS House check cards-Public Safety 16.55 5991 ASLESEN'S c.cAy rofR'L C+st/'eei srsrc«. - /i,�t,,.•;.o,, so•, r�o 184.65 5992 SCOTT ANDERSEN Mileage 6.90 5993 ADAMS SUPPLY COMPANY Sign posit-Traffic signaling 74.88 06-17-77 5994 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST Bond payment 104,635.94 5995 AKINS FIRE EQUIPMENT Hose clamps-Fire dept. 244.00 ' 5996 ACRO-ADROIT, INC. Office . q % ies 12.63 5997 A & H WELDING Key"bens°Vu-blic Safety dept. 9.00 5998 BRAVER & ASSOCIATES Services-Planning dept. -8-0:ft 656.70 5999 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS Rock for drainage control.; ew c ✓,sa 17.55 • 6000 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS, INC. Equipment parts and repa r ssrvi a 508.05 6001 DANIELS STUDIO Department pictures-Public Safety 50.50 . 6002 DALCO Cleaning supplies-Water dept. 27.35 6003 DORHOLT PRINTING Service and supplies 1,185.58 6004 CHERYL ELMGREM Mileage o ,n,,,,_,•, 37.95 6005 ESS BROTHERS & SONS 3 Grates-E 6006 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY NEWS Legal adsa 198.70 e '.6007 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS Supplies for drainage control 39.12 6008 FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITALS Blood alcohol test-Public Safety 4.00 ,-e.', 6009 FYS FRAMING Picture frames-Public Safety dept. 21.90 6010 FEED-RITE CONTROLS Ferric sulfate-Water dept. 1,100.00 6011 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Radio repairs-Fire dept. 54.90 6012 GUNNAR ELECTRIC COMPANY Repair to fire hall furnace 66.77 ----6013 GLIODEN PAINT Paint-soccer fields L.Nw_ 61.71 6014 WILLIAM HOBSON Refund on swimming lessons 8.00 ` 6015 HENNEPIN COUNTY Prisoners board - .ed D eys 572.00 6D16 NORMAN HUNSTOCK Refund on overpayment of utility bill 24.54 6017 DONNA HYATT School expense reimbursement 19.37 6018 HILLCREST SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. Fire monitor-Fire dept. 211.00 6019 HOPKINS DODGE SALES Equipment repair 31.10 6020 JONES CHEMICALS, INC. Chlorine-Water dept. 401.60 6021 JUSTUS LUMBER COMPANY Materials for Park Maint.-Pq,.'-'-rscr, 241.34 6022 TOM JAKULIC , Refund on garden plot 3.00 6023 ELAINE M. JARQUES i,r ++-,rf 32 bales of hay for drainage control 19.20 6024 KRAMERS HARDWARE Lawn mower 143.95, fertilizer and weed control 134.99 for Water dept.- '- supplies 333.51 612.45 6025 M. E. LANE Public officials liability policy 2,134.00 6026 LONG LAKE TRACTOR Mower for Park Maint. and equipment parts for repairs 1,223.47 6027 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS May service 1,020.66 6028 L-Z COMPANY, INC. Tool box to fit behind cab of utility truck 100.00 --- 6029 LAKE RILEY IMPROVEMENT ASSN. Membership contribution 50.00 6030 LEEF BROS., INC. Rugs and rags 82.60 6031 MCFARLANES, INC. Hydrant post-Water dept. :. 23.00 6032 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. Asphalt-Public Works dept. 764.46 • June 17, 1977 06-17-77 6033 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS Printed invoices for billings 52.40 6034 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. Gutter broom and equipment parts for City garage 194.01 6035 MYRON MFG. CORP. Note books-Public Safety dept. 112.81 6036 M & M ASSOC. r f -•r Wetting agent for pump luh apd,.aj.I, "6A :"1- f 6037 MINNETONKA COMMUNITY SERVICES r , ?t nc i n� ''"' �r''-1 100.00 i 6038 MODEL STONE COMPANY Brick for drainage control 20.00 6039 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE, INC. Dirt for drainage control 122.00 ,,'' • 6040 METRO PRINTING, INC. Service 1,747.00 I g ' 6041 MERIT PRINTING Permits for building dept. 373.60 ., ' 6042 METROPOLITAN FIRE EXTINGUISHER Recharge extinguishers 96.10 1 } 'W e ,6044 ORTH6043 WESTERNYNATIOMNAL BANK OF BANK OF OLIS Bond payment 113,921.09 ,,"-''t„'``' MINNEAPOLIS Bond payment 12,585.55 „'"r" 6045 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 3.84 .�Ra 6046 NORTHWESTERN BELL COMPANY Service 1,533.95 6047 PAPER DEPOT Roll paper-Public Safety dept. 16.99 6048 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Pop machine 155.00 6049 BECKI QUERNEI1OEN Mileage and supplies for election judges Sp,.,,� 32.50 6050 RAPID COPY, INC. Id cards for liquor lIcen a 11.00 6051 REUBEN DAVID, M. D. Medical exam for new employee 37.00 6052 ROOT-O-MATIC Sewer s. vico repairsc<<'w'N r 234.00 6053 STANDARD LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPLY Ink cleaner tolNilliigrar for Public Safety dept. 15.06 6054 CRANCIS E. SCHAITBERGER Contract for deed payment-Park dcpt.35;400.00 6055 SWEDLUND SEWER & WATER For service stub to property line 340.00 6056 SEARS ROEBUCK Auto parts 50.88 6057 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES, INC. P rta l9e,;:e�trpgip�-.,,_„ r,,,, ,9„„„ 805.24 6058 TOWN'S EDGE FORD, INC. wa#_rP�airc 519.81 6059 TARGET Supplies-Teen Activities 22.89 6060 TRW Repair contract for electric printing calculator 85.00 6061 VALLEY EQUIPMENT COMPANY Supplies.fo lYp grco #,Co)_,,,, 10.00 6062 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Uniforms- pt. 3,223.34 6063 UTAH LUMBER & COAL COMPANY Music for Summer Teen Activities 150.00 6064 RICHARD VOSMEK " Refund on c-rec volleyball 2.50 6065 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE .Employees insurance for June r 586.06 6066 ZIEGLER, INC. hG', ^ •~ -; -e; 501.06 6067 WILLIAM BYE Refund on P.E.R.A. withheld 8.00 6068 JOAN MEYERS Refund on P.E.R.A. withheld 8.00 6069 SIDNEY PAULY Refund on P.E.R.A. withheld 8.00 6070 WOLFGANG PENZEL Refund on P.E.R.A. withheld 8.00 6071 MIDWEST COAST TRANSPORT Tree subsidy 475.00 6072 JOHN BREN Tree subsidy 575.00 6073 THE PRESERVE Tree subsidy 3,125.00 6074 RICHARD MILLER, INC. Tree subsidy 400.00 6075 EDWARD LUNZER Tree subsidy 50.00 6076 G. L. CONTRACTING, INC. Contract-Estimate #1-Heritage Road 44,853.70 6077 NORTHWEST BITUMIINOUS, INC. Contract-Estimate i14-Westgate East Addition 2,894.92 6078 GERALD STEPANIAI: Contract-Estimate #2-Forest Knolls 2nd 8,345.61 i June 17, 1977 06-17-77 6080 QRS CONSTRUCTION, INC. Contract-Estimate #2-Stewart Highlands 68,484.15 TOTAL 419,505.63 • June 17, 1977 • STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE i COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 06-15-77 5989 PETTY CASH Reimburse City Hall fund 42.45 599D INSTY PRINTS House check cards-Public Safety 16.55 5991 ASLESEN'S Cory coffee system-Historical Society 184.65 5992 SCOTT ANDERSEN Mileage 6.90 5993 ADAMS SUPPLY COMPANY Sign post-Traffic signaling 74.88 06-17-77 5994 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST Bond payment 104,635.94 II' 5995 AKINS FIRE EQUIPMENT Hose clamps-Fire dept. 244.00 1 5996 ACRO-ADROIT, INC. Office supplies 12.63 5997 A & H WELDING Key molders-Public Safety dept. 9.00 5998 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES Services-Planning dept.-Bluffs 656.70 • 5999 8RYAN ROCK PRODUCTS Rock for drainage control 17.55 6000 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS, INC. Equipment parts and 2 valve jobs 508.05 i 6001 DANIELS STUDIO Department pictures-Public Safety 50.50 6002 DALCO Cleaning supplies-Water dept. 27.35 6003 DORHOLT PRINTING Service and supplies 1,185.58 6004 CHERYL ELMGREtt Mileage 37.95 6005 ESS BROTHERS & SONS 3 grates-Storm sewer 120.00 6006 EDEN PRAIRIE COtitiUNITY NEWS Legal ads 198.70 6007 FLK RIM CONCRETE PRODUCTS Supplies for drainage control 39.12 6008 FAIRVIEW COMMUtITY HOSPITALS Blood alcohol test-Public Safety 4.00 6009 FYS FRAMING Picture frames-Public Safety dept. 21.90 6010 FEED-RITE CONTROLS Ferric sulfate-Water dept. 1,100.00 6011 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Radio repairs-Fire dept. 54.90 6012 GUNNAR ELECTRIC COMPANY Repair to fire hall furnace 66.77 6013 GLIDDEN PAINT Paint-Soccer field lines 61.71 6014 WILLIAM HOBSON Refund on swimming lessons 8.00 6015 HENNEPIN COUNTY Prisoners board 22 days 572.00 6016 NORMAN HUNSTOCK Refund on overpayment of utility bill 24.54 6017 DONNA HYATT School expense reimbursement 19.37 6018 HILLCREST SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. Fire monitor-Fire dept. 211.00 6019 HOPKINS DODGE SALES Equipment repair 31.10 6020 JDNES CHEMICALS, INC. Chlorine-Water dept. 401.60 6021 JUSTUS LUMBER COMPANY Materials for Park tlaint.Picnic tables 241.34 6022 TOM JAKULIC Refund on garden plot 3.00 6023 ELAINE 11. JARQUES 32 bales of hay for drainage control 19.20 6024 KRAIIERS HARDWARE Lawn mower 143.95, fertilizer and weed control 134.99 for Water dept.- other supplies 333.51 612.45 6025 M. E. LANE Public officials liability policy 2,134.00 6026 LONG LAKE TRACTOR Mower for Park Plaint. and equipment 6027 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION parts for repairs 1,223.47 SYSTEMS May service 1,020.66 6028 L-Z COMPANY, INC. Tool box to fit behind cab of utility truck 100.00 6029 LAKE RILEY IMPROVEMENT ASSN. Membership contribution 50.00 6030 LEEF BROS., INC. Rugs and rags 82.60 6031 t1CFARLANES, INC. Hydrant post-Water dept. _ 23.00 6032 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. Asphalt-Public Works dept. 764.46 7 i 1 June 17, 1977 I 06-17-77 6033 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS Printed invoices for billings 52.40 6034 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. Gutter broom and equipment parts for City garage 194.01 s 6035 MYRON MFG. CORP. Note books-Public Safety dept. 112.81 a 6036 M & M ASSOC. Fire pump lubricant for Fire dept. 290.00 6037 MINNETONKA COt1MUNITY SERVICES Eden Prairie contribution 100.00 6038 MODEL STONE COMPANY Brick for drainage control 20.00 6039 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE, INC. Dirt for drainage control 122.00 6040 METRO PRINTING, INC. Service 1,747.00 6041 MERIT PRINTING Permits for building dept. 373.60 6042 METROPOLITAN FIRE EXTINGUISHER Recharge extinguishers 96.10 6043 NATIONAL CITY BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS Bond payment 113,921.09 6044 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS Bond payment 12,585.55 6045 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 3.84 • 6046 NORTHWESTERN BELL COMPANY Service 1,533.95 6047 PAPER DEPOT Roll paper-Public Safety dept. 16.99 • 6048 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Pop machine 155.00 6049 BECKI QUERNEMDEN Mileage and supplies for election judges 32.50 6050 RAPID COPY, INC. Id cards for liquor servers 11.00 6051 REUBEN DAVID, M. D. Medical exam for new employee 37.00 6D52 RDOT-O-MATIC Sewer cleaning 234.00 6053 STANDARD LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPLY Ink cleaner for Public Safety dept. 15.06 Safety dept. 6054 FRANCIS E. SCHAITBERGER Contract for deed payment-Park dept.35,400.00 6055 SWEDLUND SEWER & WATER For service stub to property line 340.00 6D56 SEARS ROEBUCK Auto parts 50.88 6D57 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES, INC. Portable restrooms 805.24 6058 TDWN'S EDGE FDRD, INC. Body work,fuel system repairs, parts 519.81 6D59 TARGET Supplies-Teen Activities 22.39 6060 TRW Repair contract for electric printing calculator 85.OD 6D61 VALLEY EQUIPMENT COMPANY Supplies for drainage control 10.00 6062 UNIFDRt1S UNLIMITED Uniforms & equip. for new officers 3,223.34 6063 UTAH LUMBER & CDAL COMPANY Music for Summer Teen Activities 150.DD 6064 RICHARD VDSMEK Refund on c-rec volleyball 2.50 6065 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE Employees insurance for June 586.06 6D66 ZIEGLER, INC. Tire and cutting edges 5D1.D6 6067 WILLIAM BYE Refund on P.E.R.A. withheld 8.00 6D68 JOAN MEYERS Refund on P.E.R.A. withheld 8.00 6069 SIDNEY PAULY Refund on P.E.R.A. withheld 8.D0 6071 WDLFGANG PENZEL Refund on P.E.R.A. withheld 8.00 6072 MIDWEST CDAST TRANSPDRT Tree subsidy 475.DD 6D73 JOHN BREN Tree subsidy 575.00 6D74 THE PRESERVE Tree subsidy 3,125.00 6075 RICHARD MILLER, INC. Tree subsidy 400.00 6076 EDWARD LUNZER Tree subsidy 50.00 6D77 G. L. CONTRACTING, INC. Contract-Estimate fl-Heritage Road 44,853.70 6078 NORTHWEST BITUMINDUS, INC. Contract-Estimate #4-Westgate East Addition 2,894.92 6D79 GERALD STEPANIAK Contract-Estimate N2-Forest Knolls 2nd 8,345.61 *607D VOIDED CHECK • v9II June 17, 1977 06-17-77 6080 QRS CONSTRUCTION, INC. Contract-Estimate #2-Stewart Highlands 68,484.15 TOTAL 419,505.63 4°►f r4 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST June 21, 1977 CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) Aqualand Pool Co. W. E. Black Co. Dolphin Homes, Inc. • David A. Williams Realty & Const., Inc. HEATING & VENTILATING Faircon, Inc. I These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for the licensed activity. Rebecca Quernenoen, Deputy Clerk