HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 06/14/1977 £GEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan
Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam;
Finance Director John Frane; Director of
Community Services Marty Jessen; Engineer
Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo, Recording
Secretary
INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
sa
A. Regularly Scheduled Council Meeting held Tuesday, May 3, 1977 Page 4691
B. Council Meeting continued from Tuesday, May 3, 1977, to Thursday, Page 4700 A
May 5, 1577
C. Board of Review Meeting held Thursday, May 12, 1977 Page 4704 1
n Board of Review Meeting continued from Thursday, May 12, 1977, to Page 4705
Tuesday, May 17, 1977
E. Regularly Scheduled Council Meeting held Tuesday, May 17, 1977 Page 4706
F. Special Council Meetinq_held Wednesday, May 25, 1977 Page 4718
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Edenvale Industrial Park, Outlot F by Edenvale, request to preliminary Page 4158
plat into 5 lots and rezone from I-General to I-2 Park. The site
is 7 acres located north of Martin Drive, east of Corporate Way, and
west of Commerce Way. (Resolution No. 77-41: Ordinance No. 77-14)
Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 1977
B. Walnut Addition by Dirlam Properties, request for rezoning from Page 4719
R1-22 to R1-13.5 and preliminary plat approval for 17—iots on
approximately 8 acres. The site is located in the NE corner of County •
Road 4 and Valley View Road. (Resolution No. 77-40: Ordinance No.
77-14)
C. Edenvale 14th by Edenvale, Inc., request for PUD Development Stage Page 4727
approval for 25 acres, preliminary plat approval, and rezoning from
Rur l to R1-13.5 with variances for 65 lots. (Resolution No. 77-77: •
Ordinance No. 77-24)
Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,June 14, 1977
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued)
D. Gunnar Rezoning, request to rezone 2.3 acres at 12975 Pioneer Trail Page 4748
from Rural to I-2 Park. (Ordinance No. 77-25)
E. Vacation of Rieman Road. (Resolution No. 77-79) Page 4765
IV. REPORTS FROM ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
V. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS }}}
A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-20, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 Pages 4274,
for the western approximately 200 acres of the Buffs East/West 4493 &4774
PUD, and rezoning agreement, Hustad Development Corporation.
(Continued from May 3, 1977)
B. Resolution No. 77-46, approving preliminary plat of 250 lots on Page 4782
approximately 200 acres of the Bluff's East/West PUD, Hustad
Development Corporation. (Continued from May 3, 1977)
C. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-23, rezoning from Rural to RM 2.5 Page 4591
and RM 6.5 for the construction of apartments and double bungalows, •
Golf Vista Addition by Edenvale, Inc. (Continued from May 17, 1977)
D. Resolution No. 77-64, approving preliminary plat for Golf Vista Page 4783
Addition b _Edenvale, Inc. (Continued from May 17, 1977)
E. 2od Read iq of Ordinance No. 17-15, rezoning from Rural to RM 2.5, Page 4784
RM 6.5 and Service-Commercial, Area "H" of The Preserve Commercial
Plan for an elderly health care retirement development, Tudor Oaks
by Covenant Living Centers of Minnesota, Inc., and rezoning
agreement.
VJ. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council members
B. Report of City Manager
1. Municipal Liquor Page 4810
2. City Hall Expansion Plans
C. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Season boat launch fees Page 4813
D. Report of City Engineer
1. Edenvale Recreational Center Replat by Edenvale. Inc., request Page 4814
to replat Lot 3, Block 1, Edenvale Industrial Park, into 4
lots. The site is presently zoned C-Comnercial and located
within the NE corner of TH 5 & Mitchell Road. (Resolution No.
77-78)
2. Receive petition and order feasibility report for improvements Page 4818
on Homeward Hills Road, I.C. 51-309. (Resolution No. 77-80)
1
Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,June 14, 1977
D. Report of City Engineer (continued)
3. Approve plans for Minnesota Department of Transportation Page 4819
for bituminous resurfacing on TH 169 from .3 mile south of
Schooner Boulevard to Shakopee. (Resolution No. 77-81-
4. Set public hearing for sewer and water improvements in Page 4822
Edenview I, Kutcher's Addition and on Kurtz Lane, I.C. 51-300.
5. Replat of Block 2, Edenvale Industrial Park 2nd Addition. Page 4823
(Resolution No. 77-82)
E. Report of Finance Director
1. Clerk's License List 5 Page 4825
2. Payment of Claims Nos. 5577 - 5988 Page 4826
VII. NEW BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT.
•
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 3, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan
Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Harlan Perbix; City Engineer Carl Jullie;
Director of Community Services Marty Jessen;
City Planner Dick Putnam, and Joyce Provo,
Recording Secretary
INVOCATION: Councilman Dave Osterholt
{
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Penzel, Meyers, Osterholt and Pauly present; Bye arrived at meeting
at 7:20 PM.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were requested to be added to the agenda:
A. Request for Council to set a Public Hearing June 14 for Gunnar •
Electric's proposed industrial site.
B. Addition of Municipal Liquor to follow item VII. E.3.
C. Flyer for the Fire Bond Referendum
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the agenda as
amended and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. Minutes of the Special Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 29, 1977
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by.Osterholt, to approve the Special •
Council Meeting minutes dated Tuesday, March 29, 1977, as published. •
Pauly, Osterholt, Bye and Penzel voted "aye"; Meyers abstained. Motion
carried.
B. Minutes of the Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 5, 1977
Pg. 2, para. 8, 2nd line, strike "under modified circumstances".
Pg. 4, para. 5, 7th line, strike "part" and insert "park".
Pg. 5, para. 2, 1st line, strike "this" and insert "the", and after "area"
insert "east of Linden Drive"; 5th para., 4th line, strike "to the" and
insert "for the proposed".
Pg. 8, add a new 13th para. to read "Pauly placed the name of -
Tim Pierce into nomination", therefore deleting "Tim Pierce" from the
following paragraph.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes
of the Council meeting held Tuesday, April 5, 1977, as amended and
published. Motion carried unanimously.
�i.(1/
Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,May 3, 1977
II. MINUTES (continued)
C. Minutes of the Special Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 12, 1977
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the Special
Council Meeting minutes dated Tuesday, April 12, 1977, as published.
Motion carried unanimously.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Edenvale Industrial Park, 2nd Addition, Outlot F by Edenvale, request
to preliminary plat and rezone 1 of the 3 lots from I-General to I-2
Park
City Manager Ulstad explained that the proponent has requested a continuation
of his request to the June 14th Council meeting.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue the Public
Hearing on the Edenvale Industrial Park, 2nd Addition, Outl.ot F by
Edenvale, to the June 14, 1977 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Bluffs East/West, Hustad Development Corporation, request for PUD
Concept approval on 400 acres of single family and mu tiple, PUD Development
Stage approval, preliminary plat and rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for
the western 200 acres of the PUD. (Continued from April 12th Special Council
meeting).
City Manager Ulstad explained that since the April 12th Council meeting
the proponent has submitted additional information to the Council relative
to statistics on school children and also additional information relative
to engineering and economics of the properties.
City Engineer Jullie outlined the area where a lift.station would be
necessary in the proposed area and that this lift station would be part
of the project cost absorbed by the developer.
Don Brauer, Brauer & Associates,outlined his communication dated
April 27, 1977 on the Bluffs East4West PUD Review.
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated April 29
and answered questions of Council members.
Wallace Hustad and Jim Ostenson, Hustad Development Corporation, and
Richard Sather, McCombs Knutson, made themselves available for questions
by Council members.
Mayor Penzel questioned if there has been strong concerns regarding the
location of some of the lots on the slopes, if there has been any
reconsideration about the intrusion, and if any conclusions have been
reached. Richard Sather explained that he hasn't examined them individually
but that the lots are natural walkout lots in his opinion. He further
stated that excavation for all of the homesites along the Bluff rim would
have to be carefully done and that proper management would handle the
problem.
City Engineer Jullie spoke to the traffic volumes and the maintenance
of Riverview Road.
_
Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,May 3, 1977
B. Bluffs East/West (continued)
Penzel referred to the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District
letter dated May 3. Allan Gebhard, Engineer for the Watershed District,
explained that the Bluffs East/West Development is scheduled for discussion
at their meeting of May 4th, but felt no action would be taken at this
meeting.
Osterholt stated that there has been discussion about certain sites
being set aside for park acquisition by the City and questioned if
we can agree to those sites and also arrive at some dollar figures.
Mr. Hustad explained he would like to see this, however, it would be
a precedent set for all developers.
Al Brekke, 10091 Homeward Hills, expressed concern of the impact of
this proposal on his land and indicated he did not want to see
development behind his barn. Mr. Hustad indicated he had met with
Mr. Brekke in the past but has been unable to come to an agreement.
Helen Fowler, 10315 Riverview Road, questioned safety with 252 more
units off of Riverview Road,and there would be additional noise
around the curve by her house which already sounds like a race track,
Ms. Fowler further stated the school that would be placed west of
Homeward Hills would not be a safe location because it is a test pattern
for training from the airport. Planner Putnam explained that the School
District is very concerned about this and the State Board of Education
has a number of criteria which would prohibit the location of a
school under the flight pattern.
Gary Gilbertson, 10127 Wild Duck Pass, stated that when he moved
to Creek Knolls one of the reasons was the way the Valley would be
preserved and he is of the opinion that the plan as presented would
keep it in a natural state the way it should be. .
Sally Brown, 10080 Bennett Place, questioned where the line would be
to allow them to enter their 10 acres. City Engineer Jullie answered
Mrs. Brown's question to her satisfaction.
Rod Sundstrom, Chairman of the Planning Commission, spoke to the action
taken by the Planning Commission.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to close the Public Hearing
and adopt Resolution No. 77-47, approving the findings of the Environmental
Assessment Worksheet whereby an Environmental Impact Statement is not needed
as per Option 1. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 77-45,
' approving the PUD Concept Plan of the Bluffs East/West PUD of 400 acres with
the designations of open space included but no density designations on
Bluffs East officially acknowledged by the City at this time. Further
direct the City Attorney to draft a developers agreement for the PUD Concept
Plan requiring that all open space areas be designated as scenic easement
with option to buy those areas defined public acquisition, the remainder
to remain in conservancy trust scenic easement. Direct staff to negotiate
per acre purchase cost and term of contract on potential acquisition area,
and that the washout areas that abut be replatted into lots with scenic
easement attached to the steep slopes and that the percentage of lots under
13,500 square feet be reduced in the final plat to 15%. Motion carried
unanimously. 'kV
•
Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,May 3, 1977
B. Bluffs East/West (continued)
Pauly stated she was reluctant to give Concept approval at this time
to Bluffs East/West until we are closer to the time of development.
Osterholt questioned how the Council intends to acquire or conserve
the open space and what the policy is going to be. Penzel explained
that he feels dedication would be the most desirous, then there is
no question as to who is responsible and who has what rights.
City Attorney Perbix suggested that a rezoning agreement be drafted
and presented to the Council before the 1st Reading of Ordinance No.
77-20.
Meyers suggested eliminating the zoning on Lot "G" at this time, and also
not rezoning the northern lots at the end of the cul-de-sac in Area "A".
In the meantime she would like staff to investigate the purchase of the Brekke
property for park land and report back to the Council if that is a viable
option or not.
•
Pauly requested the City Engineer advise which are the sensitive lots
close to the Creek so they will get special care.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to continue the 1st Reading
of Ordinance No. 77-20 and Resolution No. 77-46, approving the preliminary
plat, until such time as additional information and details have been completed
as requested by Council members. Motion carried unanimously.
IV.REPORTS FROM ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
•
Continued to May 5, 1977.
V.PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from William F. Henning, President of Titus, Inc., requesting
an extension of the PUD Resolution approval which expired April 1, 1977,
for one more year
Continued to May 5, 1977.
B. Request for a Public Hearing from Jesse L. Schwartz, W. Gordon
Smith Company
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to set a Public Hearing
for May 17, 1977 to consider the request for PUD concept and development
stage approval and variances for the construction of a restaurant/service
station combination at 8050 Flying Cloud Drive, "Wye" Mobil station
site. Motion carried unanimously.
VI.DRDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-9, Eden Prairie Industrial Park, rezoning
from 1-2 to I-General the areas designated in the PUD for the southeasterly
quadrant of the County Road 4 - TH 5 Intersection
City Manager Ulstad explained that the requests made by Council members on
screening and setbacks have been accomplished, and everything is in order
for a 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-9,with the exception of the rezoning
q L(
I
Council Minutes - 5 - Tues..May 3, 1977
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-9, Eden Prairie Industrial Park (continued)
agreement being signed by Champion Mill as the owners are out of town
until May 15. Ulstad recommended that the Council consider giving
a 2nd Reading to Ordinance No. 77-9;excluding Champion Mill at this time.
and when the owners return then consider the 2nd Reading for that particular
parcel.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 77-9, rezoning the Eden Prairie Industrial Park from
I-2 to I-General the areas designated in the PUD for the southeasterly
quadrant of the County Road 4 - TH 5 Intersection, excluding Champion
Mill from the 2nd Reading at this time. Motion carried unanimously.
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-21, The Pillsbury Company, rezoning
from Rural to I-5 Park approximately 25 acres for 1st phase construction
of a research and development facility
City Manager Ulstad explained that at the Council meeting held April 19th
the Council gave a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 77-21 with the understanding
that a rezoning agreement would be developed and in that rezoning agreement
conditions should be spelled out relative to wildlife and conservancy
assessment around Anderson Lakes. Pillsbury has now submitted a revised
proposal which we at staff level feel does not comply with the "letter"
of the Blacklock Study recommendation but does strive to meet the intent
of the plan. This revised proposal hiss been reviewed with the Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Commission for their comments.
Martin Hanson, Robert Walker, and Lynn Rhoads, representatives of the
Pillsbury Company, spoke to their proposal and answered questions of
Council members.
Osterholt questioned if this proposal meets the guidelines with the
Anderson Lakes park concept. City Manager Ulstad stated in his opinion
that using the guidelines that the City has used over the years, this
proposal comes within about 70 - 75% of the guidelines that have been
established.
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated May 3 outlining
the proposal submitted to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
on May 2nd. The Blacklock Study line called for a total of about 75 acres
of open space and wildlife habitat. The proposal as submitted includes
66 acres and in the face of that fact Jessen pointed out to the Commission
it does not comply strictly with the Blacklock Study.
Paul Choiniere, past member of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission, stated that on April 4th the Commission heard a presentation
by Pillsbury Company which was unique and well laid out and it was in
conformance with the Blacklock Study which has been used consistently
in development of the Anderson Lakes system. The Pillsbury Company followed
the guidelines almost 100%. Now there is a change in the proposal which
Mr. Choiniere does not believe meets the recommendations for the Anderson Lakes
Park.
Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,May 3, 1977 1
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-21, The Pillsbury Company (continued)
Richard Anderson, member of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission, explained that he was not present at the April 4th Commission
meeting but stated several members of the Commission feel this is a reversal
of position as to what was discussed on April 4. The intent has changed
and the Commission is disappointed that this switch has been made.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 77-21, rezoning for Pillsbury Company from Rural to I-5
Park approximately 25 acres for 1st phase construction of a research
and development facility.
City Attorney Perbix outlined three changes which have been made to the
rezoning agreement and Mr. Rhoads agreed to work with Mr. Perbix on these
changes.
MOTION TO CALL PREVIOUS QUESTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt,
to call the previous question. Motion carried unanimously.
VOTE ON PREVIOUS QUESTION: Osterholt, Bye, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye",
Meyers voted "nay". Motion carried.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the rezoning
agreement with three changes as proposed by City Attorney. Osterholt,
Bye, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", Meyers voted "nay". Motion carried.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution
No. 77-74, approving Environmental Impact Statement for the Pillsbury
property located in The Preserve. Motion carried unanimously.
C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-18, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for
Phase 1, 58 lots, Woodland Addition by Edenvale and rezoning agreement
Continued to May 5, 1977 Council meeting.
D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 357, Area "G" of The Preserve Commercial
Plan, rezoning from Rural to C-Regional Service and rezoning agreement
Pauly recommended change on page 2 of "Design Framework Manual", under
item "B", add a new sentence to read "Staff shall review the range of
material with final approval by the Council". Penzel recommended a change
on page 4, item 3, after "mounted" add "and shielded".
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 357, Area "G" of The Preserve Commercial Plan for rezoning
from Rural to C-Regional Service. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the rezoning
agreement with aforementioned changes. Motion carried unanimously.
VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Appointment of one member to the Human Rights Commission for a three
year term
Continued to May 5, 1977 Council meeting.
iu al.
Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,May 3, 1977
2. Council Goals & Objectives for 1977-78
Continued to May 5, 1977 Council meeting.
B. port of City Manager
•
1. Status report on existing and proposed highway projects - State
7—Minnesota
City Manager Ulstad explained that over the past few weeks our
Council has received a request from Shakopee and Savage
encouraging our City Council to approve a resolution for a study
of improving Highway 18-169 as outlined in Resolution No. 77-75.
Herb Klossner, Hennepin County, and Duane Brown, Minnesota
Department of Transportation, brought the Council up-to-date on
projects which affect Eden Prairie and the immediate surrounding
areas.
Mayor Walt Harbeck, Mayor of Shakopee, Ed Knoll, member of the
Highway 18-169 Corridor Committee, and Dennis Hron, Scott County
Commissioner, urged the Council to support this resolution and
promised to support any resolution our Council may adopt on a
Highway 212 resolution.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution
No. 77-75, pertaining to a study of Highway 18-169 corridor along
County Highway 18 from Interstate 494 to the Minnesota River and
the permanent corridor bridge to connect with the State Trunk
Highway No. 169 bypass to Shakopee. Osterholt, Bye, Pauly and
Penzel voted "aye", Meyers voted "nay". Motion carried.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to instruct staff
to draft a resolution for Council's consideration supporting and
encouraging development and upgrading of Highway #212 at the earliest
possible date, and to circulate to areas heard from at this meeting
to receive their support. Osterholt, Pauly, Bye and Penzel voted
"Aye", Meyers voted "nay". Motion carried.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue the Council meeting past the
11:30 PM scheduled adjournment hour until 12:15 AM. Motion carried unanimously.
C. port of Planning Director
1. Community Development Block Grant Housing Assistance discussion
Planner Putnam referred to the three options in memo dated April 27, 1977,
and recommended the Council adopt Option 3.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve Option 3 as
recommended by Planner Putnam in his memo dated April 27, 1977.
Motion carried unanimously.
uf.y'7
Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,May 3, 1977
. D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Boom Truck/Log Loader Bids
Director of Community Services Jessen recommended awarding
the bid to the 2nd lowest bidder as the low bidder did not
meet specifications.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to accept
the bid of Landco Equipment, Inc., the 2nd lowest bidder,
as the 1st bid did not meet specifications, in the amount of
$10,448.00 for a Boom Truck/Log Loader. Roll Call Vote:
Pauly, Osterholt, Bye, Meyers and Penzel voted "aye". Motion
carried unanimously.
2. Edenvale & The Preserve Park Plans
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated
April 29, 1977 and answered questions of Council members.
Bill Hans, 15370 Creekside Court, requested that more funds
be appropriated for the Edenvale Neighborhood Park Plan.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the development
of the Edenvale and Preserve Neighborhood Park sites as recommended
by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, eliminating
the northern parking lot from the Edenvale park site. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. Cash Park Fee Discussion
Continued to May 5, 1977 Council meeting.
4. Consideration of Boomer Property
Continued to May 5, 1977 Council meeting.
5. Discussion on Park Bill beforr State Legislature
Continued to May 5, 1977 Council meeting.
E. Report of City Engineer
1. Consider bids for utility improvements on Heritage Road, I.C. 51-290
City Engineer Jullie recommended awarding the bid to the lowest
bidder, G. L. Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $60,135.25 for
utility improvements on Heritage Road, I.C. 51-290.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution
No. 77-58, accepting the bid from G. L. Contracting, Inc., in the
amount of $60,135.25 for utility improvements on Heritage
Road, I.C. 51-290. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Bye, Meyers, Pauly
and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
11G98
Council Minutes - 9 - Tues.,May 3, 1977
2. Final Plat approval for Olympic Hills 2nd Addition (Resolution
No. 77-59).
3. City Hail expansion plans
4. Receive 100% petition for City installation of utility and street
improvements in the Woodland Addition of the N.W. Edenvale Area„
I.C. 51-303
5. Preliminary report on feasibility study for utility improvements on
Edenview I and Kuchers 1st Addition, I.C. 51-300
6. Receive etition for vacation of Rieman Road in the Edenvale Industrial
ar nd Addition Resolution Nc- 11-76-2)
Ail of the above items were continued to the May 5, 1977 Council meeting.
F. Report of Finance Director
•
1. Clerk's License List
Continued to May 5, 1977 Council meeting.
2. Payment of Claims Nos. 5369 - 5465
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve Payment of
Claims Nos. 5369 - 5465. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Pauly, Bye,
Meyers and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
VIII.NEW BUSINESS
Items requested to be added under "New Business" on page 1 of Council minutes,
continued to the May 5, 1977 Council meeting. •
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Penzel, to set a Special Council meeting for
May 5, 1977 for Thursday, May 5, 1977, 7:00 PM at City Hall, for the purpose of considering
items that have not received action on this date. Motion carried unanimously.
IX.ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adjourn the Council meeting at
12:17 AM. Motion carried unanimously.
U61a9
1
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, MAY 5, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL
(Continued items from
May 3, 1977 Council Meeting)
COUNCIL, MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan
Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Engineer
Carl Jullie; Director of Community Services
Marty Jessen; and Donna Stanley, Recording
Secretary
ROLL CALL: Penzel, Meyers, Osterholt and Pauly present; Bye was absent.
•
Items listed are those thatdid not receive action on May 3, 1977, thus they
were continued until this meeting.
IV. REPORTS FROM ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
None.
V. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from William F. Henning, President of Titus, Inc.
requesting an extension of the 'FJD Resolution approval which
expired April 1, 1977, for one more year. (Dated 4/20/77)
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to extend the PUD
Resolution approval of Titus, Inc. for six months. Penzel, Pauly, and
Osterholt voted "aye", Meyers voted "nay".
Meyers spoke to discussion by homeowners and was concerned that if
this Resolution expires, we will have a problem, especially if the
construction is going on at that time.
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-18, rezoning from Rural to
Rl-1 .5 for Phase 1, 53 lots, doodland Addition by Edenvale
and rezoning agreement.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 77-18, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for Phase 1,58
lots, Woodland Addition by Edenvale. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve rezoning
agreement. Motion carried unanimously.
/Pb0
Council MinutesThursday, May- y 5, 1977
VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Appointment of one member to the Human Rights Commission
for three year term
Continued until the next meeting.
2. Council Goals & Objectives for 1977-78
Osterholt suggested continuance of this matter until all members
were present. Council members agreed.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Proposed Resolution establishing a moratorium on Mobile
Homes
City Manager Ulstad spoke to request by a proponent to place a
mobile home on his property for use as a home, and suggested the
moratorium until the matter had been studied.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to direct City Attorney
Perbix to draft Resolution establishing a moratorium on mobile
homes, not to exceed one year. Motion carried, with Penzel.
Meyers and Pauly voting "aye", and Osterholt voting "nay".
2. Municipal Liquor
To be considered along with City Hall Expansion Plans (E.4.)
D. Report of Director of Community Services
3. Cash Park Fee Discussion
Director of Jommunity Services Jessen explained original implementa-
tion of "cash park fee", which should speak to providing neighbor-
hood playgrounds, of which there are 21 sites around the City. He
said .:%24O,OCO should be enou h to acquire each site,and that sum
included a fiften t acre site, utilities and roads, plus 20% contin-
gency. He added that in most cases, we are better off asking
for "cash park fees" than for land dedication.
Council members requested that a summarized report on synopsis of
the "cash nark fee" Ordinance, and of the Rusted Bluffs :lest pro-
posal be prepared and be broughhtback on the Agenda.
4. Consideration of Boomer Pro.x rty
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his Memo of
April 29, 1977 and indication by Mr. Boomer that he would consider
y1U1
•
Cr
Council Minutes - 3 - Thursday, May 5, 1977
4. Consideration of Boomer Property (continued)
any offer if you are interested in pursuing the matter.
Osterholt asked for information about taxes on the property;
who pays the back taxes and assessments; and whether there was
Watershed District assistance in funding and what specific
price would be paid. Request the above information for meeting
of May 17, 1977.
5. Discussion of Park Bill before State Legislature
Jessen spoke to the 1977 session of the Minnesota State Legis-
lature and its consideration of a bill to fund parks and recrea-
tion areas and facilities throughout the State, part of which
would be the purchase of the Bren property at Bryant, included in
the Metropolitan Regional Park category.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution 77-57
supporting the parks and recreation bonding program before the
State Legislature. Motion carried unanimously.
E. Report of City Engineer
2. Final Plat approval for Olympic Hills 2nd Addition (Rea. No. 77-59)
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly to.approve Resolution
77-59, final plat approval for Olympic Hills 2nd Addition. Motion
carried unanimously.
3. City Hall expansion plans
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue this
matter and the Municipal Liquor matter until the next regular
meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Receive 100" petition for City installation of utility and
street improvements in the Woodland Addition of the N.J.
Edenvale Area, I.C. 51-303 (Resolution No. 77-61)
Continue until next meeting.
5. Preliminary report on feasibility study for utility
improvements on c;donvi.ew I and Kutcher's 1st Addition,
1.d. d-300
Continue until next meeting.
6. Receive petition for vacation of Rieman Road in the Edenvale
Industrial Park 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 77-62)
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to set June 14,
1977 as Public Hearing date for Rieman Road in the Edenvale
Industrial Park 2nd Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
F. Report of Finance Director
1. Clerk's License List - Continued until next meeting.
Council Minutes -4 - Thursday, May 5, 1977
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Request for Council to set a Public Hearing for an Industrial
Site for June 14, 1977 pay Gunnarson)
•
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to set June 14, 1977
as Public Hearing date for request by Clay Gunnarson for an
Industrial Site. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Discussion on flyer the Fire Department will use to promote
the fire bond referendum
Council authorized Mr. Osterholt to proceed with the layout of the flyer
for the Fire Department bond referendum.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:
Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adjourn the meeting at 8:00 PM..
Motion carried unanimously.
11103
k
MINUTES
BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
THURSDAY, MAY 12, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL
BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Sidney Pauly,
Joan Meyers and David Osterholt
BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS ABSENT: Billy Bye
BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad, City
Assessor Bob Martz, Assistant City
Assessor Lorna Thomas, Appraiser
Bob Korn, Harold Hudson, Hennepin
County Appraiser representative
The Board of Review was called to order by Mayor Penzel at 7:10 PM on
Thursday, May 12, 1977.
The following people appeared and were heard by the Board of Review:
1. 56847 - 4500, Eldred Wiley, Appraiser, representing East-West Office
building, information furnished by the appraiser to be reviewed.
2. 56708 - 2610, D. H. M. Eames, propartu - land - to be reviewed by
City Assessor.
3. 56720 - 5675, Charles DeBono, Pioneer Trail, taxpayer to contact us
for review.
4. 56800 - 9600, Richard O'Brien, representing home owners in Cedar
Ridge. Dispensation to be discussed and worked out with City Manager
Roger Ulstad.
5. 56709 - 3275, Pouglas Page, to contact City Assessor if he wants
property appraised and if so appointment to be made.
6. 56780 - 8110, Robert Danielson, no revalue unless he calls us.
7. 56849 - 7300, Herber J. Stephens, no complaint, just wanted to know
process used in valuation.
MOTION: DAVIDOSTERROLT MOVED, SECONDED BY WOLFGANG PENZEL TO RECONVENE
Tar BOARD OF REVIEW NESTING ON TOES., MAY 17, 1977, AT 7:00 PM.
NOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
•
4704
MINUTES
BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
•
TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1977 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL
(Continuation of Board of Review
meeting held May 12, 1977)
BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Sidney Pauly,
Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt, Billy Bye.
BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF PRESENT: City Assessor Bob Martz,and City Manager
Roger Ulstad.
INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE • ROLL CALL
Invocation was given by Harlan Perbix, City Attorney.
The Board of Review reconvened and was called to order by Mayor Penzel at 7:00 P.M.
City Assessor Bob Martz gave a report on the disposition of Items 1 thru 7 of the
May 12, 1977 meeting.
Item #2, D.N. M Eames property, Plat 56708,Parcel 2610,valuation reduced to 1976 value
per verbal agreement between the City Assessors Office and Mr. Eames.
Item #5, Douglas Page, Plat 56709, Parce13275, City Assessor to report findings to
Board Members when owner contacts the City Assessor to setup an appointment for
inspection of property.
MOTION: City Assessor Bob Martz recommended that Resolution #77-74 be
adopted, directing the Board of Review to accept the 1977 Valuation Assess-
ment. Councilwoman Joan Meyers moved, Councilwoman Sidney Pauly seconded,
motion carried unanimously.
The following motion was made for closing the meeting:
MOTION: Councilman Dave Osterholt moved, seconded by Councilwoman Sidney
Pauly, to close the Board of Review Meeting at 7:10 P.M. and certify
its completion of the heraing. Motion carried unanimously.
•
4'105
•
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan
Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Harlan Perbix; City Engineer Carl Jullie;
Director of Community Services Marty Jessen;
City Planner Dick Putnam, and Joyce Provo,
Recording Secretary
INVOCATION: City Attorney Harlan Perbix
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members present.
Council meeting began at 7:14 PM as the Board of Review meeting was held prior to the
Council meeting.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were requested to be added to the agenda under the "New
Business" category:
A. Discussion on mini-bikes
B. Industrial Commission meetings
C. Request from Tudor Oaks for a temporary grading permit
D. Communication System for Public Safety
E. Discussion of potential nuisance ordinance
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the agenda as amended
and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 19, 1977
Pg. 2, 2nd para., 1st line, strike "HOK" and insert "Hellmuth, Obata &
Kassabaum, Inc., Architects.
Pg. 4, last para., 2nd line after "Services" add "as an existing Eden Prairie
Policy".
Pg. 6, 5th para., add "Motion carried unanimously."
Pg. 9, item 4, change heading to read "Designation of Valley View Road from Mitchell
Road to proposed Schooner Blvd. and proposed Schooner Blvd. from Valley View Road
to T.H. 169 as an MSA route".
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes of the
Council meeting held Tuesday, April 19, 1977, as amended and published. Motion
carried unanimously.
Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,May 17, 1977
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Golf Vista Addition by Edenvale, Inc., request for preliminary plat
and rezoning from Rural to RM 2.5 and RM 6.5 for the construction of
apartments and double bungalows. The site is located in the NE
corner of Valley View Road & Golf View Drive.
Don Peterson, Edenvale, Inc., outlined his proposal and answered
questions of Council members.
City Planner Putnam spoke to Planning Commission minutes dated March 14,
noting that the Planning Commission has had this item before them on
three different occasions
Bill Langer, 14160 Green View Court, President of the Green View
Homeowners Association, explained that the homeowners in the Green View
area have two major concerns: 1) eventual traffic pattern on Green
View Drive and 2) what the impact of proposed apartments and double
bungalows will do to their property values and aesthetics of the whole
neighborhood.
Mari Dragseth, 15071 Summerhill, Chairman of the Housing Task Force,
spoke in support of the project as this gives the City some housing in
the community a little bit lower than what single family housing has been
coming in at.
Ron Lee, 14091 Sundial Court, concerned that there is a hodgepodge of
things going into the area that are individually nice, but pushed together are
less than attractive in total.
Tom Tennison, 14314 Golf View Drive, spoke to traffic problem on Golf View
Drive and also construction on the hill,as he does not believe things on the
hill can be preserved.
Mr. Peterson explained that it has always been Edenvale's intent to use the
hill and that the double bungalows are as nice as any home in the Golf View
subdivision, and people will not be able to tell if these are double bungalows
if they don't count the doors.
Dave Anderson, 14349 Wedgeway Court, questioned why this area would not be
successful for single family homes. Mr. Peterson replied because of the cost
this area is not economically feasible for single family housing, and there
is a strong desire for double bungalow units in this kind of environment.
Osterholt expressed his concern about the entrances and exits on to
Golf View Drive and people traveling on that road.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to close the Public Hearing on
Golf Vista Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
Osterholt stated he would like to go out and view the site before he votes
on the proposal. Mr. Peterson stated he would not be opposed to the Council
members wishing to view the site.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to continue any action
on Golf Vista Addition to June 14, 1977 Council meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
y�U7
Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,Mey 17, 1977
B. Extension of Forest Hill Road to Baker Road, 1.C. 51-294
City Engineer Jullie spoke to traffic counts taken on old Valley View
Road, new Valley View Road, Golf View Drive and Kingston Drive, and
to the seven alternatives and cost of same.
Bill Langer, 14160 Green View Court, read a letter submitted by
Mr. John Lobben dated May 17, 1977. (Letter attached as part of
minutes).
Gordon Coomans, 14015 Forest Hills Road, stated he did not really
know whether there is a great need for a through
street on Forest Hill Road.
Don Opheim, 13731 Theresa Place, questioned if there is a problem
right now. City Engineer Jullie responded he has not heard of any
concerns directly to his department on Kingston north of Holly.
Mr. Ophein felt money should be put into an arterial route.
Don Peterson, 7025 Mariann Drive, stated he thought the ultimate
solution should be consideration of Mitchell Road to Baker Road.
Mr. Peterson felt this question should be delayed until the residents
in the neighborhood desire a road and until there is a definite need
for an extension of Forest Hill Road to the east.
John Westlund, 13730 Theresa Place, spoke against the extension of
the existing deadend at Theresa toward the south as he could not see why
the City should make a through street of Theresa when Baker Road
is only a block away.
Wilbur Gjersvik, 7102 Baker Road, could not see building a road until
sewer and water is available.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to close the Public Hearing
and that consideration of the extension of Forest Hill Road to Baker Road
not be approved at the present time. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Wye Mobil/Country Kitchen by CEDQ_Builders, request for PUD concept
and development stage approval and variances for the construction of
a restaurant/service station combination on approximately 1.7 acres at
8050 Flying Cloud Drive, "WYE" Mobil station site.
Planner Putnam spoke to Staff Report dated May 9th and Planning
Commission minutes dated May 9th.
Jesse Schwartz, Jr., W. Gordon Smith Co., outlined the proposal and
answered questions of Council members.
Dave Gustafson, Country Kitchen International, spoke to the signing
aspects of the proposal.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to close the Public Hearing and
adopt Resolution No. 77-65, approving the request for PUD concept and
development stage approval and variances for the construction of a restaurant/
service station combination for Wye Mobil/Country Kitchen on approximately
1.7 acres, and to designate the Pegasus sign as a historic site for Eden
Prairie. Motion carried unanimously.
1110Z
Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,May 17, 1977
Councilman Bye excused himself from the meeting at 9:30 PM.
IV. REPORTS FROM ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A. Report from the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
Director of Community Services Jessen reported on the Parks, Recreation
& Natural Resources Commission meeting held Monday, May 16, whereby the
Commission recommended approval of the City sponsoring a gymnastics program
as a part of the City's activities.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the sponsoring of a
gymnastics program as a part of the City's activities as recommended
by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at their
meeting held May 16, 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
V. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 338, amending Human Rights Ordinance
to include Community Based Services Board to assist all supervised
residential programs or social rehabilitation programs
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the 1st Reading
of Ordinance No. 338, amending Human Rights Ordinance to include
Community Based Services Board to assist all supervised residential
programs or social rehabilitation programs, and to refer this ordinance
to the Human Rights Commission for their review before a 2nd Reading
is given. Motion carried unanimously.
•
B. Resolution No. 77-66, establishing polling places
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No.
77-66, establishing polling places. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Resolution No. 77-67, appointing election judges for June 14, 1977
Fire Bond Referendum
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded b:,' Meyers, to adopt Resolution No.
77-67, appointing election judges for June 14, 1977 Fire Bond
Referendum. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Resolution No. 77-72, temporarily prohibiting the bringing in and
installing as residences mobile homes within the City of Eden Prairie
Osterholt requested that staff review the records to see if any requests
were granted for mobile homes in our community and if a certain policy
was used by the Council.
NOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 77-72,
temporarily prohibiting the bringing in and installing as residences mobile
homes within the City of Eden Prairie.
Fred Baumann, 10805 Valley View Road, asked if there were any directives
given in the resolution as to the development of the guidelines. City Attorney
Perbix explained that the City is in the process of the Guide Plan review and
that it was his expectation that the mobile home question would be part of the
review.
ii'709
Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,May 17, 1977
D. Resolution No. 77-72, temporarily prohibiting the bringing in and
installin as residences mobile homes within the City of Eden Prairie
(continued)
Osterholt felt the adoption of this resolution would be discriminatory.
MOTION TO CALL PREVIOUS QUESTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to call
the previous question. Motion carried unanimously.
VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION: Meyers, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", Osterholt
voted "nay". Motion carried.
Meyers requested this item be placed on the Planning Commission agenda
as a work item pertaining to conditions and circumstances.
VI.REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Report of Council Members
1. Appointment of one member to the Human Rights Commission for
a three year term
Continued to June 21, 1977 Council meeting.
2. Council Goals & Objectives for 1977-78
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to set a Special Council
Meeting to consider Council Goals & Objectives for 1977-78
on Monday, June 13, 1977, 7:30 PM at City Hall. Motion carried
unanimously.
8. Report of City Manager
1. City Hall expansion plans
City Manager Ulstad suggested to the Council that consideration be
given to building a 2-story addition to the City Hall of approximately
2,500 square feet on each floor, and requested authorization from the
Council to proceed in contacting s rchitects for their proposal.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to authorize Staff to
proceed to receive 3 proposals from architects, making certain architects
within the City of Eden Prairie are notified if they desire to submit
their proposal, and to bring recommendations back to the Council.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. Municipal Liquor
City Manager Ulstad spoke to memo from Director of Community Services
Jessen dated May 5, 1977 on comparative figures for Lease vs. Owning
and suggested the Council consider leasing for 2 - 3 years and then see
what position the City would be in for a Freestanding building.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to instruct staff to proceed
to receive firm quotes on lease arrangements, fixtures and details on
inventory by the June 14th Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
4710
Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,May 17, 1977
3. Vernon Seck and Cedric Warren's request for a private off-sale
liquor license
Mr. Seck and Mr. Warren wished the City good luck with Municipal
Liquor and asked that their request be considered in 1980
if the City does not wish to continue with Municipal Liquor.
4. Sign Ordinance
City Manager Ulstad explained that all the information regarding
the comparative analysis of the old Sign Ordinance (Ordinance No. 261),
and the new draft Sign Ordinance has not yet been compiled. This
information will be submitted to the Council in the "For Your Information"
packets.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to continue the
Sign Ordinance to the June 21, 1977 Council meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
5. Request for a Public Hearing for Walnut Addition for June 141_1977
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to set June 14, 1977 as
the Public Hearing date for Walnut Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
6. Request for a Public Hearing for Edenvale 14th Addition for June 14, 1977
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to set June 14, 1977 as the
Public Hearing date for Edenvale 14th Addition. Motion carried
unanimously.
•
C. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Cash Park Fee Discussion
•
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated
April 29, 1977, report on the Cash Park Fee, and answered questions
of Council members.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded b; Osterholt, to refer this matter to
the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission for their
recommendation, and to the City Attorney for a definition as to what
the City can enforce. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Consideration of Boomer Property
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated May 13, 1977
and answered questions of Council members.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to direct Mr. Jessen
to negotiate the transaction for the Boomer property subject
to the Riley/Purgatory Watershed District's participation. Motion carried
unanimously.
Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,May 17, 1977
3. Gorra Lease
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated
May 13, 1977 regarding the Gorra House at Anderson Lakes Park.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to direct staff to
draw up a lease agreement to rent the Gorra House at Anderson
Lakes Park for a two-year period at a realistic rate. Motion
carried unanimously.
4. Report of Tree Subsidy Program
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated May 13, 1977
regarding the Tree Subsidy Program.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to receive the report
from Director of Community Services Jessen dated May 13, 1977 and
to only reimburse residential properties as by State regulations.
Motion carried unanimously.
D. Report of City Engineer
1. Receive 100% petition for City installation of utility and street
improvements in the Woodland Addition of the NW Edenvale Area,
I. C. 51-303
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution
No. 77-61, receiving 100% petition, ordering improvements and
preparation of plans and specifications for public improvements
in the Woodland Addition, I.C. 51-303. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Preliminary report on feasibility study for utility improvements
in Edenview I, Kutcher's Addition and Kurtz Lane, I,C. 51-300
City Engineer Jullie spoke to his memo dated May 12, 1977 and answered
questions of Council members.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconde1 by Pauly, to direct staff to notify
affected property owners and poll them to see if they still wish to have
a Public Hearing, and to report results of the poll to the Council.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Final plat approval for Garrison Forest 1st Addition
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Reolution No.
77-69, approving the final plat for Garrison Forest 1st Addition.
Roll Call Vote: Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", Meyers and Osterholt
voted "nay". Motion failed.
Meyers indicated her ";o" vote was because there is not a street
connection between the two subdivisions.
411 .
•
Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,May 17, 1977
4. Authorization to advertise for bids for paving machine and roller
City Engineer Jullie spoke to memo dated May 12, 1977 and answered
questions of Council members.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to authorize the advertisement
for bids for a tailgate type bituminous paving machine to be received
June 10 and awarded on June 21. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Preliminary plat approval for Hipps Mitchell Heights 3rd Addition
City Manager Ulstad explained that the Planning Commission has recommended
approval of the preliminary plat for Hipps Mitchell Heights 3rd Addition.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution
No. 77-71, approving the preliminary plat for Hipps Mitchell Heights
3rd Addition subject to the recommendations of the Planning Commission.
Motion carried unanimously.
6. Receive petition for paving on Riley Lake Road, I.C.51.305
City Engineer Jullie spoke to memo dated May 12, 1977 and answered
questions of Council members.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution
No. 77-70, receiving petition and calling for a hearing for June 21, 1977.
Motion carried unanimously.
E. Report of Finance Director
1. Payment of Claims Nos. 5466 - 5576
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve Payment of
Claims Nos. 5466 - 5576. Roll Call Vote: Pauly, Osterholt, Meyers
and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
2. Clerk's License Lists dated May 3, 1977 and May 17, 1977
O
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the Clerk's
License List dated May 3, 1977, deleting the private kennel license
for Lewis & Bodine. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the Clerk's
License List dated May 17, 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
VII.NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion on mini-bikes
Meyers referred to call she received from a resident whose son had his
mini-bike impounded by our Public Safety Department. The resident thought this
was a case of discrimination against mini-bikes.
This matter was referred to the City Attorney for his opinion as to how
the City can regulate mini-bikes or trail bikes, or if we already have an
ordinance regulating same.
4'113
Council Minutes - 9 - Tues.,May 17, 1977
B. Industrial Commission meetings
General discussion took place regarding the meeting time and place of the
Industrial Commission.
C. Request from Tudor Oaks for a temporary grading permit
City Manager Ulstad spoke to the request from Tudor Oaks for a temporary 1
grading permit.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to grant Tudor Oaks a temporary
grading permit. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Communication System for Public Safety
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 77-73,
approving Department of Public Safety Radio Service with Hennepin County
for 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
E. Discussion of potential nuisance ordinance
City Manager Ulstad explained that the Council had received a nuisance
ordinance which another municipality has adopted. Ulstad asked the Council
if they would consider such an ordinance for our City.
Council members directed City Attorney Perbix to review the aforementioned
ordinance and draft an ordinance as it would pertain to our City.
VIII.ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adjourn the meeting at 12:20 AM.
Motion carried unanimously.
LON
3
John Lobben
14090 Forest Hill Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
May 17, 1977
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
Re: PUBLIC HEARING ON POTENTIAL EXTENSION OF FOREST HILL ROAD TO
BARER ROAD
Dear Council Members:
My name is John Lobben and my wife and I reside at 14090 Forest Hill Road
with our two children, ages four and two. Although very interested, I am
unable to attend tonight's public hearing due to a work conflict. Therefore,
I instead submit the following written comments for your consideration.
Our basic concern is for the safety of our children. As I am sure you
are aware, children, despite parental efforts, often have an
unfortunate disregard for danger and, at times, an unbelievable lapse
of memory. . . often very conveniently. When playing, despite parental
guidance and supervision, children are often inattentative to potential,
dangers . . . especially when crossing roads with severe site line
problems.
Presently on Forest Hill Road there are eight children under eleven
years of age with five children under age six. Several other children
are eleven years of age and older. As you are aware, Forest Hill Road
is now being extended approximately 300 feet for six additional homes.
That coupled with two vacant lots on the existing Forest Hill Road
could mean a potential increase in additional young children. Extending
Forest Hill Road to Baker Road would obviously mean additional homes
and even potentially more children.
In many ways that is excellent, but in the context of children safety,
a road extension could not only create a serious safety problem on
Forest Hill Road, but also contribute further to the existing dangers
on GolfView Drive. Therefore, we urge that careful consideration be
given to such matters as need, impact, timing, potential traffic
controls (including route), area road improvements, existing and
projected traffic generators, emerging traffic patterns and future
road extensions so that the potential dangers to our children will be
minimized.
I am sure that you also are concerned, and I do appreciate your willingness
to give careful consideration to the following brief but relevant comments,
questions and suggestions:
•
1. Does the condition of the existing section between Valley View Road
to Baker Road cause some individuals to chose to travel on GolfView,
Kingston/Holly and potentially on Forest Hill Road?
In/S
-2-
2. What affect will the Hennepin County Crosstown extension delay
have on plans to upgrade Valley View Road?
3. Would upgrading Valley View or extending Forest Hill be of greater
benefit to Eden Prairie Residents?
4. Which of the above is a higher priority and deserving of limited
funds. . . assuming source eligibility?
5. I am aware of the traffic counts conducted last week with and
without the barrier on Old Valley View Road. It is my under-
standing that the Old Valley View Road section is now under consideration
to be closed because of possible apartments and duplexes. I have
not had the opportunity to review the data collected nor any potential
conclusions drawn. I do, however, commend the council and staff
for this effort and am confident that the data will be studied to
see if in fact temporarily closing Old Valley View Road had
significant enough impact on the traffic volume on the new section
of Valley View Road, Golf View and Kingston/Holly to warrant extending
Forest Hill Road with increased danger to children xesiding there.
6. I have heard it stated by some non-residents that Golf View
residents desire an outlet from Golf View. I am unsure if that
• is in fact accurate and do not recall any polling of feelings with-
in the past two years. Would the city like the Homeowners Association
to poll Golf View residents to find out if they desire any additional
outlets?
7. What, if anything, could be done to lessen potential traffic. on
Forest Hill Road if it were to be extended?
a) Of the four routes under consideration, three appear to go
basically straight to Baker with the fourth angling to Raker
by connecting with Theresa Place. Would a straight route
tend to increase or decrease the volume of traffic, speed,
etc.? Would the ended route discourage the volume of traffic
speed, etc. by being less of a "thoroughfare"?
b) I am wondering as to why these are the only four options under
consideration and not others such as connecting to Mariann
Drive.
c) Considering the width of Forest Hill Road, would no parking
on one or both sides reduce dangers to children?
d) What affect would stop signs have? Who is to enforce potential
violators?
8. Regardless if a straight or angled route is chosen, are any potential
connecting streets contemplated in the future which would add further
to the volume of traffic on Forest Hill and GolfView?
-3-
9. Could a traffic control review be conducted in light of the
present GolfView, Kingston, Holly problem and the potential
Forest Hill road extension? A careful review of existing and
projected area traffic patterns, volumes and controls seems to
be in order, especially in light of such existing and projected
traffic generators as additional high density apartments, McDonalds,
restaurants,Prairie View Mall, golf course, potential extension
of GolfView Drive through the golf course, etc. Rather than
errecting stop signs on a band aid, petition basis to solve the
problems of a developing section of the city, it would seem
appropriate to pause, assess, project, prioritize,and implement
in an organized manner with input from interested, affected citizens.
There is an association of home owners in the Golf View section
of Edenvale that would no doubt be most willing to work with the
City Staff because they are interested and concerned about the •
steadily increasing traffic problem and resident safety. The
rolling terrian of the entire area poses site line problems for
not only cars, but also for the most disciplined child.
Eden Prairie is an excellent, progressive community because of the
Council's willingness to seek neighborhood input as plans are established
which affect not only the future character of the neighborhood, but
also the very safety of its residents. My wife and I appreciate the
opportunity to share our comments as our family is directly affected •
by your ultimate decision.
Sincerely,
John Lobben
•
•
y'l►'?
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
WEDNESDAY, MAY 25, 1977 8:00 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan
Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad and City Attorney
Harlan Perbix
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Bye, Meyers, Pauly and Penzel present; Dsterholt absent.
City Manager Ulstad spoke to the Notice of Call for Special meeting.
I. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from The Preserve for the Council to reconsider action of
May 17 regarding Final Plat approval for Garrison Forest 1st Addition
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to reconsider Resolution
No. 77-69, approving the final plat for Garrison Forest 1st
Addition as requested in May 20th communication from The Preserve.
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Lee Johnson, representing The Preserve, pointed out the
difficulties in providing a street connection to the south and
connecting to Linden Drive. Mr. Johnson also presented a preliminary
draft of a plat to the north of Garrison Forest, outlining how the
two developments would tie together and provide for street access
to County Road 18.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No.
77-69, approving the final plat for Garrison Forest 1st Addition.
Bye, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", Meyers voted "nay".
Meyers explained her "nay" vote was because of her concern about school
bus access and future traffic patterns for residents in the area.
B. Regyest from Bermel Smaby for the Council to set a Public Hearing
for June 21, 1977 for rezoning of 1 acre to Office
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to set June 21, 1977 as the
Public Hearing date for the request from Berniel Smaby for rezoning
of 1 acre to Office. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Request from Condor Corporation for the Council to set a Public Hearing
for June 21, 1977 for rezoning 5 acres to I-2 Park
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Pauly, to set June 21, 1977 as the
Public Hearing date for the request from Condor Corporation for rezoning
5 acres to I-2 Park. Motion carried unanimously.
II. ADJOURNMENT •
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to adjourn the meeting at 8:21 PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
y�l$
• June 14, •1?77
•
• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-40
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
•
• Walnut Addition
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Walnut Addition
_ , dated May 19, 1977 , a copy of
which is attached hereto and amended as follows:
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of
the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and
amendments thereto and is herein approved. -
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on •
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
s
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
0/9
1
9
MINUTES
EDEN PRAlklE PLANNING COM+MISSI0N
Unapproved t
Monday, May 23, 1977 7:30 PM
IV. REPORTS AND RECONt+IENDATIONS •
A. Walnut Addition, by Dirlam Properties, request for rezoning from R1-22 to
R1-13.5 and preliminary plat approval for 18 lots on approximately S acres.
The site is located.in the northeast corner of Co. Rd. 4 and Valley View
Road. A public hearing.
•
Mr. Leo Stern, Attorney for Mr. Dirlam, stated the plat has been revised down to
17 lots as requested by the City staff and the zoning requested is for R1-13.5 .
Sundstrom inquired if the developer would be constructing the berm along Co. Rd. 4.
Mr. Stern replied the property is heavily wooded and perhaps covenants can outline
the necessary berming and landscaping to be done by the developer along Co. Rd. 4.
Mr. Harold Marquardt, 16301 Valley View Road, stated the adjacent property owners
had received a letter from Mr. Dirlam stating no multiple is being requested. He
asked if the holding pond near Valley View Road would still be in use. The planner
stated the pond will be temporary until curb and gutter are in.
Mr. Marquardt asked for the distance from the Valley View Road/Co. Rd. 4 intersection
to the entrance of the project. The planner estimated the distance to be 265 feet.
Mr. Gordon Carlson, 7352 Franklin Circle, inquired if the grading at the north end
of the project would still drain water towards Mr. Berne's property. The planner
stated the City Engineer has reviewed the drainage and it is assumed some drainage
from back lots will still drain to the north but the majority of drainage would
be to the street.
Mr. Carlson stated he appreciates the City Council's and.Mr. Dirlam's efforts
as he feels the neighbors' concerns have been met.
Motion l:
Schee moved, Redpath seconded, to close the public hearing on the Walnut Addition
preliminary plat. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 2:
Schee moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend approval of the rezoning
request from R]-22 to R1-13.5 by Dirlam Properties as per the May 19 ,
1977 plat the May l6, 1977 staff report and May 18, 1977 Engineer's report.
for 17 single family sites. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 3:
Schee moved, Redpath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the
preliminary plat for Walnut Addition as per the May 19, 1977 plat , the staff
report of May 16, ]977 and Engineer's report of May 18, 1977. Motion carried
unanimously.
•
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant
TOROUG : Dick Putnam, Planning Director
DATE: May 16, 1977
APPLICANT: Dirlam Properties
PROJECT: Walnut Addition (2nd submission)
LOCATION: Northeast corner of Valley View Road and Co. Rd. 4
REQUEST: Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 and preliminary plat
approval for 18 lots on 8.5 gross acres.
REFERENCE •
DOCUMENTS: 1. May 3, 1977 Walnut Addition rezoning application
2. Jan. 6, 1977 Walnut Addition rezoning application
3. Staff Report dated Feb. 1, 1977
BACKGROUND
The property was previously submitted for rezoning to RM 6.5 and RM 2.5
for multiple family residential uses. The Planning Commission recommended
approval of a modified request. The request Was withdrawn from considera-
tion at the April 5, 1977 Council Meeting in order to redesign the plan
for resubmission.
ZONING $GQ1Jf:ST '
The current request is for rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 . The RI-13.5
District allows detached single family residential with a minimum lot size
of 13,500 square feet. and a maximum density of 2 lots per acre. Setbacks
required in the district are as follows:
Front yard 30 feet
Side yard 10 feet one side/25 feet both sides
Rear Yard 20 feet
SITE PLAN ANALYSIS
The preliminary plat proposes a north/south street connecting to Valley View
Road . This street, Walnut Court, has 2 cul-de-sacs serving the interior of
the property.
The lots meet the minimum lot size of 13,500 square feet, ranging in size
from 13,504 to 18,430 square feet. The proposed plat shows several lots
having street frontage?. on cul-de-sacs of 40-43 feet. The staff recommends
minimum street frontage of 45 feet to accomplish suitable side setbacks at the
building pad. The proposed plat has 18 lots on 8.5 gross acres at a density
of 2.12 lots per acre. lbe overall density is slightly over the 2 lots/acre
requirement of Ord. 135 and would require a variance.
t 721
•
- 1
Staff Report-Walnut Addition -2- May 16, 1977
2nd Submission
Soils,Topography,Grading and Vegetation
The soils are of the Hcyder Series and are generally well suited for the
type of development proposed.
The site is very gently sloping and a minimum of grading will be required to
accomplish the development. Any excess fill from grading in of streets or
basement excavation should be used to construct a buffer .
Installation of utilities and grading will require removal of some of the
existing vegetation. Vegetation removed may be transplanted in conjunction
with the buffer to provide screening from Co. Rd. 4.
RECOMMENDATIONS
I. The planning staff recommends approval of the rezoning request
from R1-22 to R1-13.5 by Dirlam Properties for 8.5 acres subject
to the following:
a. that the final plat contain no variance requests from the
provisions of Ord, 135.
b. that a buffer be constructed along Co. Rd. 4 to restrict ped-
estrian crossing and reduce visual/noise impacts.
2. The planning staff recommends approval and redesign of Walnut
Addition reducing the plat by one (1) lot , thereby.increasing
the cul-de-sac frontages to a minimun of 45feet.
JEJ:jmj
•
•
•
•
• •
CITY OF MEN PRAIRIE
C111:X2K LIST FOR REVIEWING P1XWOSED
LAND DEVEIJ.WMaiTS
•
D1d'E: 5/18/77
DEVSLOMENT: Walnut—liddition L.D. NO. .7.7_p_z,A, 1
LOCATION: Northeast quadrant to Co. Rd. #4 and Valley View Rd. (N-Sec. 8
RePERWICE P.D.D. OR PREVIOUS
ZONING AGRIXEENT: (none) Rts #•
DEVEIPPER: Dirlam Properties • -
ENGINEER/PTANNER:
DOCUMENTS SUISEITTED FOR RIX : Preliminary Plat_Aatediaril 1971
PROPOSAL: The Developer is requesting rezoning to R1-123.5 and Prelimthary plat_
Approval
1. Land Develc.p.:Tnt application fi1e0 aml filing fee & deposlt paid Yes
Copy of application forwarded to Watershed District Yes
2. Processing Sc:liedule:
a. Planning & Zoning Commission Preliminary
b. Park & Recreation Commir.:t.ion
c. Doman Right s CommicO ion
(1. Planning Commission Public llrg.C. 5/23/77
City Council cons id erat ion
f. liat.ernhe0 District
3. Typo of novolopment Residential - proposed single family detach4. ed
nwironment al a::::e5Isna•ntor imi,act statement rinnired ror Roy ironmental
bopact Policy Act. of 1073:
No
in 23
. _ 2
•
S. Preuent Zoning R1-22
6. Proposed Zoning R1-13.5
Consistent with approved P.U.U. or Comp Plan? Comp. Plan indicates mult. residential
List variances required & sethacks that apply: None requested. Developer's
Engineer (Don Peterson) has indicated that the plan submitted will be
revised by dropping 1 lot on the southerly cul-de-sac
2.1 units per acre for 18 lots
7. Project Area 8.5 acres __DentatY 2.0.310.its Jx.acre.,fnr 17_1nts__
8. Public open space and/or cash dedication _CA _]gd.ieation air per o ,�32
Private open space Non proposed --
Trail. systems & Sidewalks _None proposed future City Trail prgnosed algpg_l'�11ey
View Road
Range of lot sizes 13,500 _.f, to 18.500 s.f.
9. Prelimin❑ry Building Plans Not submitted
10. Reprc:scnii.ative Soil Borings Not submitted (soils_generally O.K_)
1.1. Strcct System
A. Access to a(ijoi.niny pro; .rt.ios O.K. connection to julpsta Lane could___
causetbrough traffic avoiding the intersection of Valley View Rd. & Co. Rd. 4
D. Type R/N Roadwrrya(1?;,cli to nai: of Curb)
Pr.i.vat.e
driveways, no 24
parking „ Post no parking signs
Leading to Cu). de sacs 50 28. _Required
(not over 10(10') :.
minor residential
Cul do sacs 100 78 (no island)
120 98 (with :inland)
Thr❑ Residential (collectors)
& Cul de saes
over 1000' GO 32
•
0211
/ • _ 3
74SA 70 44
Parkway 100 28 divided
•
Fire Road 12
Pathways 12 6
Street grades-max. 7.5%, min. .5t
Concrete curb F. gutter required,
strength asphalt design Required •
— 1
Deep
C. Check City's comprehensive street system.
Developer builds 1/2 of parkways at his cost, F, R/id dedication
10' dedication required for Valley View Road_ ____ _ __
D. Street Names •- try to conform with existing in the area. Avoid additional
names on cul de sacs having eight or less lots.
Check list of existing street names.
E. Pri:'ato parking lots---RG-12 cone C&G and f NlAdepth aeph design
•
Signs-Developer or City irnit:.�lls Developer purchase - City iu� all
V. Street l` ...-__Developer
-
12. Parking: (See Ord. 4141) _------__--- - -- —
13. Utility Systems:
Available from Valley View Road �, _—
A. Srniiary Newer ^-------
1. Service Detail4".minimum
2. Service to adjoining property n
a
]3. Watcrm:cn: —2.lvailahlu_fxAJ�_I�ugust:arSane_and.-Ua7.leyView--Read
1. Check Servicc Design (20 l+::i: at hidhc::l. fixture)
review pending final design ^—
2. 1lyclr ,t a . ]ucal.iun-Fire Tuspeeter _-_-____-_-._.__�._ --
review pending final dosing
3. Valuing ___� f —
review pending final design
4. Complienc,: with fire code _
5, Service to adj:ccc•ccc pr,+l+r.rly Connc_l.ign_ i.t2LV.83rt .Ad.>dat�� n _
t
rlzTJ
• - a -
C. Storm Sewer. & Grading Drainage.control plan-to.ba prepared-P-.SubttliLY.ed_-
- prior to preliminary plat approval
1. Sediment control. plan Required for ggllt;];5.1t>rta:4n-Alana
2. Shimming a grit control for commercial parking lots N A
Provide temt.. pondinc_area at S.W.
3. Positive outlet for drainage ponds - corner
4. Avoid excessive grading and tree removal Required
Required 5. Arro:us showing drainage Re q -
Accomodate drainage franc adjacent properties Req_uired"_.
6. Denote drainage area for individual inlets and projected high water
for ponds fired ---
Required- _ -
7. Y.cep drainage in gutters, not in center of street
Required
O. Sod drainage swcles and steep :lope, Required ^-
, _ -----�_
9. Flood plain encroachment •_ None .._
}0, Watershed Districtapproe;) Required _-
11. Ili it approvaln.oval .N.A• - -.'
Underground required
U. I.atur;cl Gas & Telephone
required
E. Electric (underground) - required
-- _
Petition from developer required at time
14. :Street Lights S On-Fate Lighting c filial from developer
— - —
15. Preliminary plat to ]re• ruhmitted to NSD or Senn. Co. if abutting a
State or County llwy.
};ennepin County..}li5.1l!•.ua Dept.,__ is .._Rd._�'c91__.---.---
16. List special tcr :Ga:iiu:nC:; ]rvicd and Penc7iuc.] ._LeYicsa. 85.G9'7 r rnra .S Ltnt- r
$86f14.00_ (I S63 Storm sewerc.13118_361---Pcnfli119...-$23_Pe n`t
Valley Vic_ Road _-_ -_._'_
17. Pe-zoning :nlreemant required Yes -----
Developer-'.: Agreo,n nit required -Yes
Title Ah::t.rct, for Attorney's review No ._.r
472(
June 14, 1'77
CITY OF ELEN PRAIRIE •
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-77
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PRELIIMINARY PLAT OF Edenvale
•
14th Addition
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Edenvale 14th •
Addition , dated April 21, 1977 , a copy of
which is attached hereto and amended as follows: •
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of
the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and
amendments thereto and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
•
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
•
027
approvtJ
-2- April 27,, 1.77
Planning Commission
C. Edenvale loth Addition,hy Edenvale Inc., request for POD Development Stage
approval for 25 acres of land and preliminary plat and rezoning approval
from Rural to R1-13.5 for 65 lots. The 14th Addition is located directly
north of Edenvale Boulevard and west of Edenvale 11th Addition. A continued
public hearing.
Mr. Putnam introduced Mr. Jim Jensen, Assistant Planner, who has been working full time
as Planning Assistant since April 15, 1977, and who wrote the report on Edenvale 14th .
Mr. Peterson located the project for the commission and stated the lot sizes are
larger than lots approved in the 10th and 11th Additions. He stated the property
has concept approval for multiple , but they are now requesting single family detached.
He believed the concerns of the staff have been met in the revised plat. As suggested
by the staff, he said the northeastern street could be extended in the future and
a SO' access is provided to the property to the west of the 14th Addition. The lots
have a minimum of 70' across building pad &,average lot size is 10,500 square feet rang-
ing up to 3/2 acre in size. Peterson stated the project was introduced at Edenvale's
annual homeowner's meeting and no objections were raised, in fact the homeowners preferre
the single family to the previously approved multiple.
Bearman inquired about the frequency of train traffic on the tracks to the north and
the distance between the tracks and single family lot lines. Peterson replied the
train runs 4 times a day and the lots range in depth from 100-154 feet and the railroad
right-of-way is 50' on the side.
Bearman asked if a noise buffer would be constructed. Peterson stated a ridge and/or
heavy tree growth does exist along most of the project, and in the areas where it does
not they could construct berms.
Bearman asked for the number of lots below the R1-13.5 size. Peterson responded the
majority of the lots are below 13.5.
Bearman then inquired why the developer is requesting blanket variances. Peterson
replied the blanket variances are requested to allow flexibility in placement and
size of units on the smaller lots.
Redpath asked if P.Ft 6.5 could be used instead of R1-13.5 . The planner responded
it has been used in the past in a few instances but allows construction of multiple
and in order to protect the single family intent of the project the staff is recomweding
it be zoned to R1-13.5 with variances.
•
y`i7.d
•
•
•
•
•
•
• approved
1'l::nr.]ng Cu:40 fission -3- •
April 25, 1977 •
Schee asked if the cash in lieu of land dedication would be applicable to this
project or if the proponent is intending to dedicate green spaces. Peterson replied
U.atlots A-D would be dedicated, approximately 4 or S acres.
Schee then asked if there would be any architectural control. Peterson replied only
through the standard covenants.
Sundstrom asked if members in the audience had any questions or comments. None
•
were raised.
Motion 1:
Schee moved, Beaman seconded, to close the public hearing on the preliminary plat
for the Edenvale 14th Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 2:
Schee moved, Redpath seconded, to recommend to the city council approval of the PUD
Development Stage plan for 25 t acres of land located in Edenvale's NW Area to be
developed as single family detached lots and amending the Edenvale PUD 70-04 .
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 3:
Schee moved, McCulloch seconded, to recommend to the city council approval of the
rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for Edenvale 14th Addition for 65 lots in conformance
with the revised plan dated April 21, 1977 ; the Edenvale 14th Addition brochure
dated March, 1977; the staff reports dated April 5th and 21, 1977; and the
Engineering report dated April 21, 1977. And to include in the approval that the
northeastern road be extendable and that necessary berms be constructed along the
railroad tracks for sight and noise screening. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 4:
Schee moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the city council approval of the
Edenvale 14th Addition preliminary plat for 65 lots as per the revised plat dated April
2l, 1977; the staff report dated April 21, 1977; and Engineer's report dated
April 2], 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
y�29
•
•
•
•
C cizi<<�on approved
6- April ll, 1977
C. Edenvale loth Addition, by Edenvale Inc., rr?uest for PUD Development Stage
approval for 25 acres of land and first phase approval, preliminary plat and
rezoning from Pura) to RM 6.5 for 30 lots. The loth Addition is located
directly north of Edenvale Boulevard and Nest of Edenvale 13th Addition.
Public Hearing.
The planner informed the commission the proponent has requested continuation of
the item.
Motion:
Acarnoan moved, McCulloch seconded, to continue the Edenvale 34th Addition public
hearing to the April 25th meeting. Motion carried unanimously. •
•
q`l 0
•
•
•
•
approved_
tlarrltn9 Commis ion MiruTe, -7- Mardi IV.
B. Edenvale )4th Addition, by Edenvale Inc., request for PUD Development
Stage approval for 25 acres of land and first phase approval , preliminary
plat and rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 for 30 lots. The 14th Addition
is located directly north of Edenvale Boulevard and west of Edenvale llth
Addition. Public hearing to be held April 11, 1977 .
Peterson presented the single family subdivision . The plat consists of.
minimum 60 ' frontage, average across pad of 70 ', and possible connection
of the north/south street across the railroad to ):urtz Lane. He stated the
homes would he moderately priced and they are requesting RM 6.5 zoning
instead of R)-73:5 because some lots are below the 73.5 size.
Motion:
Pauly moved, Sundstrom seconded, to continue the item to the April 1lth meeting
and refer to staff for a report. Motion carried 3:0:1, Sorensen abstained.
11'73(
CITY or EDEN PRAIRIE
CHECK LIST FOR REVIEWING PROPOSED
LAND DEVELOPMF:NTS
DATE: April 21, 1977
•
DEVELOP11:dtr: Edenvale 14th Addition L.D. NO. LD-77-P-10.Z-11
LOCATION: itlots E and F. Edenvale 3rd Addition
REFERENCE P.U.D. OR PREVIOUS
ZONING AGrdi'1ENT: Edenvale PUD 70-03 RES. 4.
•
DEVELOPER: Edenvale Inc.
ENGINEER/PLANNER: Westwood Planning and Engineering
DOCUMENTS SUJMIITTED FOR REVIEW: Preliminary plat dated Dec. 9, 1977 ; revised
preliminary plat April 21, 1977
PRWOSAL: The developer is requesting rezoning and preliminary •
plat approval of GS lots.
1. Land Development application filed and filing fee & deposit paid yes
Copy of application fors:erded to Watershed District Yes
2. Processing Schedule:
a. Planning & Zoning Commission Preliminary 3-28-77
b. Part• & Recreation Coaunission
c. Human Rights Commission
d. Planning Commission Public Nrg. 4-28-77
e: City Council consideration
f. Watershed District
single familyresidential
3. Tyne of Development .__ g
4. Novironi ntal ar:::cr.smenf or i.mwact; statement required per Environmental
ImpacP Policy Act of I9 :
No
L(�31.
` 2 - .
5. Present Zoning Rural
6. Proposed Zoning R1-13.5
Consistent with approved P.U.D. or Comp Plan? yes •
List variances required & setbacks that apply: Standard setback variances •
for PUP areas have been requested. Recommend approval but deleting reference 1
to fireplaces and overhangs ( refer to attac7eO staff-report et.-0, 1976).
Also, variance required for more than 2 units / acre. •
•
7. Project Area 25 acres Density 2.6 units/acre
B. Public open space and/or cash dedication +ark dedication satisfied through
Edenvale PUU.'�
Private open space Outlots A, B, C and D
' Trail systems & sidewalks proposed ( refer to staff report Apri•1 21,.1977 ).
Range of lot sizes 23,400 to 8,400 square feet (10,500 square foot average)
9. Preliminary Puilding Plans not submitted •
10. Representative soil Borings not submitted (soils generally look ok)
11. street System
A. Access to M oira ng properties emergency connection only to Kurtz Lane ,
consider possible extension of EW cul-de-sac
B. Type R/w Roadway (Pack'to Pack of Corb)
Private
driveways, no 24
parking Post no parking signs -_
Leading to Cul de sacs 50 28. required
(not over }000') &
minor residential
Chl de sacs 100 78 (no island)
120 98 (with island) required
Thru Residential (collectors)
& Cul do sass
over 1000' 60 32 required on connection to Kurtz •
A portion of Out lot P. (north 50') should be dedicated for
street purposes.
i 733
•
•
- 3 _
MSA 70 44 •
Parkway 100 20 divided
Fire Road 12
Pathways 12 6 -Eequired
Street grades-max. 7.5t. min. .5%
Concrete curb & gutter required, required
Deep strength asphalt design _
C. Check City's comprehensive street system.
Developer builds 1/2 of parkways at his cost, & R/W dedication N.A.
D. Street Names - try to conform with existing in the area. Avoid additional
names on cul de sacs having eight or less lots.
Check list of existing street names. required-Engineering Department to review
mmles.
E. Private parking lots--B6-12 cone C&G and full depth asph. design
N.A.
F. Street Signs-Developer or City installs _develnperntrrhace-city hall install
12. Parking: (See Ord. t)141) ok
13. Utility Systems:
A. Sanitary Sewer available - onsite extension required
1. Service Detail 4" minimum
2. Service to adjoining property investigate possibility of gel-vivo to
Kurtz Lane area.
B. Watmrmaiu:' available- onsite extension required.
1. Check Service Design (20 psi at highest fixture) ok
2. ilydrat:t location-rite A:,pcctor review pendinl.final des] n
3. Valving review pending final design
4. Compliance with fire code fire inspector to review.
5. Service to adjacent property provide possibility for connection to ._
Kurtz Lane area.
The watermain system in the easterly cul-de-sacs must he looped.
Provision mast be made for eventual connection with future development
to the Cast ( Outlet I) ).
' •
4 _
C. Storm Sewer & Grading _
1. Sediment control plan watershed district to review and fll QY°
2. Skimming & grit control for comnercial parking lots N.A.
•
3. Positive outlet for drainage ponds required. Also check overflow from
Outlot C to lot 14.
4. Avoid excessive grading and tree removal _required
5. Arrows showing drainage !required otynradin _p_Lan
Accomodate drainage from adjacent properties required
G. Denote drainage area for individual inlets and projected high water
for ponds
required
7. Keep drainage in gutters, not in center of street required
8. Sod drainage swales and steep slopes required
9. F]oa3 plain encroach:.ent none - -_-
10. watershed District approval required
11. DPP approva]. N.A.
D. Natural Gas & Telephone underground required
E. Electric (underground) required
14. Street Light. & On-Site Lighting developer or property owners must request
15. Preliminary plat to he submitted to MILD or Henn. Co. if abutting a
State of county Nwe,
16. List special assessments levied and pending Levied: 11 58SS trunk
sewer § water A31,947 . 71 b732, fdenv_tle_streets ji6,451..97.
laterais_ltcndinn_if developer remusts city_to install utilities.
17. Re-toning agreement required required
Developer's Agreement recn•i.rc;l recurd
Title led act for At:turney's review No
03C
•
•
•
MEMO
TO: Dick Putnam
Wayne Sanders
Dave Olson
Roger Ulstad
•
FROM: Carl Jullie
DATE: October 19, 1976 '
RE: Setbacks
For the sake of uniformity, the following setbacks will be recommended in
the case of a single family residential plat in a PUD where setback variances
are requested by the developer:
5' Garage to side lot line
10' 1 and 112 story house to side lot line.
15' 2 story house to side lot line.
30' Front of building to front lot line, except
25' on eel-de-sacs.
20' Rear of house to rear let line,
20' Side yard setback for houses built on
corner lots, but not conflicting with
30' setbacks on adjacent lots.
50' Minimum from any building line on MSA,
County and State highways.
Fireplaces and overhangs shall not be considered
as setback encroachments.
Accessory structures shall not be placed in the
front yard and shall be 5' minimum from side and
rear lot lines.
For subdivisions without variances, the standard setbacks listed in Ord.
f135 (copy attached) shall apply.
y93C
•
•
�s.
STAFF REPORT --- AMENDMENT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: ' Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant
THROUGH: Dick Putnam, Planning Director •
DATE: April 21, 1977
AMENDMENT TO: Edenvale 14th Addition staff report of April 5, 1977
(based on revised plat dated April 21, 1977)
The following changes are proposed by the proponent to reflect concerns
made by the city staff:
1. Round cul-de-sacs with 100'right-of-way radius have
replaced the square cul-de-sac in the March proposal.
This provides for more ease of maintenance and is an
acceptable alternative. Frontages have also been
changed on the cul-de-sacs to provide a more acceptable
width.
2. Grading changes along the east/west roadway provides
for stormwater discharge to Outlot C. This plan also
shows the roadway following over the hill with cuts of
about 4 feet. Double frontage of lots has been eliminated
by placement of an eyebrow cul-de-sac on the north side
of the east/west roadway.
3. Deletion of the most northwestern lot provides for a possible
access point to the small parcel lying between Edenvale 14
Addition and the Purgatory Creek Floodplain. •
• 4. Mr. Peterson has assured the staff that fill would be
provided to establish a sufficient building pad for lots
fronting on the northeastern cul-de-sac. Two of these
lots back onto a low swampy area corresponding to Out lot D.
5. Negotiations on pathway systems have resulted in the following:
-pathway between Edenvale 14th and Ilth Additions •
will be changed from asphalt surface to limestone
or grass.
-a paved pathway will be built in the right-of-way.
along Fdenvale Coulevard to provide future connection
to Edenvale School Park and Valley View Road.(attached)
-Mr. Peterson has agreed to change the zoning request
from Rural to R1-13.5 instead of RM 6.5 for the 14th Addition.
JEJ:jmj
u137
+..irvw ff
P
gppa 4AT11-
0
/ DE
0.
".. rt" ( I4
\ •
a t
, . I. 0
prcTit-
br6rtr f
I I
i
eY UcvEI.• i path
a°eP i�—�eYcrrY
� ED JVPLE
t., ( .
,.., .
,, Pp.1,G PhtN" Y A W4EIL PATH
A" 1
r� y F,y
/ tr rEn `PATH 6 1 5f°1
' GITY
NOTE: UNpAV 1C
eb mkt Fret .
�l'� \\
t;! \�. lox* %vit. Ie mamalisttyp\v T vevEtzfx0 To
\\a -*Saxe 7NL` MAIN PATH 516r6A.
\�a
C� 1
L. I I/
y
•
031
STAFF REPORT
•
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant
THROUGH: Dick Putnam, Planning Director ,
,DATE: April 5, 1977 •
APPLICANT: Edenvale Inc.
PROJECT: Edenvale 14th Addition • •
LOCATION: 25 acre parcel located on Outlots E & F,
Edenvale 3rd Add. , north of Edenvale Blvd.,
south of the C.M. St.P 11 P Railroad and west
of Edenvale 11th Addition
REQUEST: PIID Development Stage Approval
Phase 1 rezoning to RM 6.5 for 30 lots and •
preliminary plat approval
REFER TO: 1. Edenvale PUD Concept
2. Edenvale Trail Concept Study,5/72
3. Suncrest Townhouse Development,3/74
4. Edenvale 14th Addition Application 3-77
S. Edenvale rezoning and PUD concept infor-
mation 4/5/77
BACKGROUND:
This parcel of land is currently designated PUD 70-04 and is shown
in the Edenvale Land Use Plan as N-1, multiple family ( see Fig.l ).
A 6.8 acre public park area borders the site on the south. Cedar
Point Townhouses is located across Edenvale Boulevard directly
south of the site and is zoned RN 6.5 . To the east is Edenvale
11th Addition, Outlot D and Edenvale 3rd Addition. The north is
bordered by Chicago Northwestern Railroad. North of the tracks is
currently zoned R1-22 and is being developed in single family homes.
Kurtz Lane runs paraellel to and north of the railroad tracks.
A small parcel of land is located west of the site and is currently
not zoned. West of this area lies Purgatory Creek floodplain. There
is also one existing single family home occupying one lot.
DENSITY
The site was originally approved on a concept plan for medium
density housing at a density of not more than 6.3 u/acre. It was
rejected by the City Council for a double dwelling project of
4.4 a/gross acre for 134 units on 30.7 acres (see fig.2 ). The
site is now being submitted as shown in the brochure at a lessor
density of 2.76 a/acre on 25 gross acres.
y1 31
Staff Report-Edenvale 14th Add. -2- April 5, 1977
•
ZONING REQUEST
The request is for rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 to accommodate
single f;iaily residential. The following variances are requested
by the applicant:
5 foot side yard setback 15 feet between main buildings
30 foot front setback
According to the Zoning Ordinance, District RM 6.5 has a permitted •
use of " attached dwelling units and accessory structures by platting
or planned development". A minimum of 6500 square foot lots are
permitted . The setbacks are as follows:
30 feet front
20 feet rear
10-25 " sides ( one side, both sides)
The zoning District R1-13.5 provides for single family dwelling
units with a maximum density of 2 lots per acre. This district
refers to "detached dwellings and accessory structures of standard
or modular construction by platting or planned development with
sanitary sewer service". Setbacks are same as RM 6.5.
Blanket variances in R1-13.5 have been granted as follows:
5 foot garage to side lot line
10 foot 11 story unit to side lot line
• 15 feet 2 story unit to side lot line
30 feet front of house to front property line
20 feet rear of house to rear property line
20 feet side yard from houses built on corner lots,
but not conflicting with 30'setback on adjacent
lots.
* densitips greater than 2 du/acre
•
y'7gry
•
•
• Staff Report-Edenvale 14th ..3- April S, 1977
SITE PLAN ANALYSIS
Square cul-de-sacs arc indicated with a 100 ' wide square right-
of-way. According to the city engineer, upkeep and maintenance
makes the square cul-de- sac unacceptable. A round cul-de -sac
with a v' radius would solve the maintenance problem and equally
important , with realignment of lot lines in some areas, the street
frontages could be extended to a minimum of 43 feet. Square cul-
de-sacs seem to indicate additional parking or street frontage
problems. The staff believes that additional parking in the cul-
de-sac is not necessary and that a reasonable street frontage can
be accomplished with round cul -de-sacs.
In the proposed plat there are three lots which are either double
or triple fronted. In all cases, service could be provided from
either street and lot sizes are not large enough to accommodate
double or triple frontages, thus making these lots more undesirable.
The staff feels that the problem can he arrested by a more direct
alignment of the cast/west roadway with the cul-de-sac off of the
other side of the street ( see fig. 3 )
The submitted preliminary plat depicts cuts of up to 10 feet in the •
grading of the east/west road to provide drainage onto the north/
south road. Drainage patterns shown on Fig. 4 . The excess soil
removed would probably be used to fill the southwest lots where
poor soils exist. The staff recognizes the drainage needs but feels
an alternative to the extensive grading of this area should be
sought. The roadway backslopes in this area would also remove
existing vegetation back away from the road right-of-way.
The staff would propose that the east/west roadway follow the
lay of the land with cuts of no more than 2-3 feet . Drainage
could be accommodated in existing sedimentation ponds which
have a proposed overflow connection with street storm sewer system.
The staff also feels that a coarse material be brought in as fill
in the low southwestern lots.
Access, Circulation
Access to the site is gained through Edenvale Boulevard. The major north
access to Co. Rd. 4 would be through a connection of Edenvale Boulevard to
Birch Island Drive. Some type of knockdown barrier to permit emergency
vehicles only would he installed. The main access to Co. Rd. 4 to the south
would be through Valley View Road.
Soils, Topography, Crading
The soils on the site are of the Hayden and Ileyder Series. Vie texture is
loamy to clay which is suitable for single family residential. Potential
groundwater pollution is low on these soils but erosion potential is severe
on slopes greater than 12%, thus creating ❑ pollution problem by sedimentation
in nearby lakes and streams. Much of the site is made up of slopes greater
LI'N I
Staff Report-Edenvale 14th -4- April 6, 1977
than 12 % so a minimum of grading and removal of vegetation is required to
attenuate soil loss during construction.
The alignmq, t of roads and placement of cul-de-sacs- seem to respect the
general topography although a good deal of cut and fill is required in
specific areas to accommodate the site plan.
About half of the site now drains into the low south western portion of the
site which is proposed for 6 lots . Accommodating these lots requires
excavation of several feet and backfilling with coarse material.
The street will intercept most storm water from the higher building area
to the east.
The low area designated Outlot D is shown having two lots extending into it.
The staff feels that more fill than is shown on the grading plan is required
to bring these lots above the wet area. A more acceptable plan would be to
pull the cul-de-sac back 30-40 feet to allow homes to be built with a
minimum of filling.
The grading should be studied more extensively by the developer to see if so
much is required. Cuts of as much as 10 feet are shown on the grading plan
to accommodate road and utility installation.
Since the soils are quite erosive and extensive grading is required in some
areas, establishment of ground cover is necessary to keep soil loss at a
minimum. Sodding of newly graded slopes greater than 12% and seeding of slopes
less than 12% is necessary to accomplish this. The plan does retain the
major land forms however and does not render the land to unrecognizable form.
The streets and major grading areas are kept out of the large stands of trees.
Wherever grading permits, the vegetation should be saved.
Vegetation
Because of the erosive nature of the soils, the vegetation must be treated
as extremely important because of its contribution to prevention of erosion.
The developer should be aware of this importance and not treat any of the vege-
tation as scrub or weed species and discount its importance. Some of the
major tree species on the site include: basswood, ironwood, elm , ash, birch,
tamarack, aspen, cottonwood and poplar, as well as some red cedar and pine occurring
on the dryer slopes.
Pedestrian Circulation
•
The original concept of pedestrian trails is indicated on Figure 1. The planning
staff prnposes trails for this project occuring in the following places: On
the south edge of the proposal along )idenvale Boulevard , and all or part way up
the north south roadway in the right-of-way. This trail system would eventually
circulate pedestrians safely to and from the public areas south on Edenvale
Boulevard. This trail system will provide project residents convenient access
to all community facilities located in )Edenvale. The trails as all other common
areas, should be maintained by the homeowners association. The public should
have the right to use the trails by the same logic that sidewalks are used in
the traditional scu:o. Provisions should be made to connect this trail system
with a possible future Purgatory Creek trail system.
a +
. i N.\\ ./ .fisecitigt T. ,
..) .
. .
• , .., .
. .
. ,
. \., .
: . „ .
\ ,
.. c.4...„, .
. , •,, -..„, .. .. \
.,
.....„. • „.....„, .
.„-., ,....,..
, , , , , ....,,, 4
•
•
• . \, -
•
, GI 4s.-3 _
__. -,,
....0-0 .
. ***••0 e 0 0% Oa
/ ♦ • • t
- :
•
,-.lam' — • ,.— .. ..-/, •` •
••'
\.. .,.
•
•
i ••�
♦ •'• • t .
•
•
•
•
i t
r . '
•
•
r "r7•
n � � & .
.., •
1•rIn• .
.. i. .
.,i
5 1Ci '100 • C / j,
$ �/ lJl�4Ta •
eir / !. i
IDEr'�;1TY
•
•
\ t.,...',.,....c..i.\. ...\ , -./.:; './../ ,,:-...4.y. (
/ /� \l '`, , ti
:'-':-.- \ .
•
,
/
\ l \ ‘ 1 / i
•'
C ,• I \.1
� , • \ ; .\ ' • •1 <_ •\\ \\` • •
N. I - 1
, ‘.2. \ I ..• ;!I'' \00\
i /, . ;'\
• public park
i
/" , yi4S
.. • • ...). :.; . .; ,71i4 13 CCIfit 2;10 . .
\ ,
•
•
f %.. -'tomA \ ° O. 'r u 'a m
' 1 Y
T-------- .. ,.... >
c T 1
, ,\'..-.•-"-\ , \ A „, _.-i\* :. .,
! I . - -2--_1 ,.' -CI ..,, ,),,•:A-,,V, -\• . \ . . r;
. . „,. \ Y \_. \•<' ''''." / '' \ \ V: ' •,., .
•
\.\�i /• • / �' '\ \� ;;/\
Y
1
1
4-1yt-
, ... . :-,.., . TB Ng'10 6
. •. . ), "
, .
.......„.. .: , � , ; ;,, •, . ,
l• - `1-.. \\�•�,1 \ ; \•( �` % • '•
Y r\c,.„r, ....
.__c ?. ,, ;.' 7 , ., ....,), - , \ • \ ,
•
•
/ ,..„,-,'\•- _,.,.' J. J
i r-.....:„. :,,,--..:. r---,.. - v \ • \.., \ 4 , ,..: % g . :,<1._ ...,.:.. • '' . .
,/ \-:'/-II\-''.\
. : ..
..'\\\' '.. \
�I i � 3
I _' C ,\ .! .."\ 4 a .
i •
•
i
•
41111 •
•
•
•
•
r..
b. Gunnar Electric Rr_oning, request to rezone 2.3 acres at l_,75 I'i .ner
Trail from Rural to l-2 Parl:.
The planner referred the cca:mission to the staff report previously submitted
and stated the staff heli.eces the industrial use is appropriate based upon
the uses to the west, proximity to airport rinway noise F, future industrial de•,eltp.-
ment across Co. 'Rd. 1. The planner informed -the commission Mr. Gunnarson
is out of ton but ;Sr.Hen)ricl.son is here to represent Mr. Gunnarson.
Lynch expressed concern that the integrity of single family be protected •
against uses as commercial and industrial .
The planner stated, in his opinion, he does not believe single family uses will
he proposed in this area due to the airport noise and the adiacent industrial.
Lynch questioned if the request can be handled any easier than previous requests
as the road location has not been resolved and utilities are not immediately
available.
Sorensen asked Mr. Hustad how long it might be before the area across Co. Rd.
l from the Gunnar site is developed with utilities. Mr. Hustad replied 1-3 years.
Sorensen believed a holding tank is not a desirable solution to the utility problem.
The planner believed the holding tank is better than a septic tank and that
presently Curr,ar Electric on Co. Rd. 4 is a nonconforming use and is attempting
to relocate. The planner stated water and Sewer connection is not specifically
required under the ordinance but has seemed to be city policy.
tin. Schaitherger stated he is not opposed to industrial development but a
sufficient buffer should exist between single family and industrial , a buffer of
approximately 200 feet not •earth berms and plantings. He expressed his opinion
that the conditions of Resolution 345 , previously denying development, have not
been met and the city does have the basis for denying Gunnar's request at,this time. •
Sundstrom believed that the intent of the resolution are still in effect as not.
all conditions have been adequately resolved.
Motion:
Fetnocht moved, Pauly seconded, to recommend the Gunnar request for rezoning
from Rural to l-2 Park on L 2, B 1, M 6 I) Addition, parcel 8050, be denied
as previous concerns stated in Resolution 345 have not been met . Motion carried
3:0:5 with Sorensen, Schee and Sundstrom abstaining.
1./7i/
•
•
•
•
apprc'.ed •
Planning Commission "eeting -5- March 14, 1977
E. Gunnar+ Electric Rezoning, request to rezone 2.3 acres at 12975 Pioneer Trail
from Rural to I-2 Park.
Mr. Clay_Gunnarson stated his zoning request is for the last lot of the M $ K Addi-
tion, will be east of the existing I-2 lots, the building will be setback 100 feet
from Co. Rd. 1 and will not be affected by future realignment and he intends to
screen his industrial use from the single family home to the east.
The planner referred the commission to the staff report and said the staff is
recommending approval of the request.
Fosnocht inquired how far back the other industrial uses are from Co. Rd. 1 .
Mr. Gunnarson replied approximately SO feet.
Mr. Schaitberger, 12880 Pioneer Trail, stated he does not oppose industrial develop-
ment in the city if it is consistent with the Guide Plan but has opposed rezoning
requests on this lot as the open space provides him with a buffer from the existing
industrial uses. He suggested if the plan is approved the building be further
setback and an adequate buffer constructed. He stated he would prefer the site
zoned to residential.
approved
Planning Cornission Nesting -6- !.arch 14, 19
77
Fosnocht asked what the distance is between the proposed building and the
Schaitberger home. Gunnarson estimated 60 feet.
Schee asked what types of businesses would be within the building. Gunnarson
replied the building would house his electrical company and approximately 6 bays
would be rented-out to other industrial type uses.
Mr. Schaitberger stated he had not seen the building plans until today and acid
if the item could be continued perhaps he and other persons involved could work
something out.
Acting-Chairman Fosnocht directed the staff to place the item on the following .
agenda to allow the property owners further time to discuss the plan and asked
the council to set a public hearing for the request at their convenience.
°?y9
STAFF REPORT
TO: ` Planning Commission
FROM: Dick Putnam, Planning Director
DATE: March 9, 1977
PROJECT: Gunnar Electric
LOCATION: Lot 2 Block 1 M & K Addition
Parcel 8050
12985 Pioneer Trail
OWNER: Herb Kleve
REQUEST: Rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park
BACKGROUND
In February, 1970, George Maurer applied for rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park
for all of the land within the M & K Addition. The City Council and Planning
Commission, after review of the request, denied the application as it was
inconsistent with the Comprehensive Cuide Plan recently adopted .
In the Spring of 1970 Hr. Maurer petitioned District Court to
overturn the city's denial of his rezoning request. In June of 1970 the
Court denied Mr. Maurer's petition thereby upholding the city's decision .
In March 1972 Mr. Maurer submitted a zoning request for the entire M & K
Addition. The city , in reivew of this request,approved rezoning from Rural
to I-2 Park for the eastern 200 feet of the M & K Addiiton , but denied the
rezoning on the western 200 feet .
In March of 1974 Mr. Maurer applied for rezoning for the eastern 200 feet
from Rural to I-2 Park . At that time,due to the pending Airport Study
Public Hearings and road realignments , the city continued action and
did not approve the Maurer rezoning request.
In July of 1975 Hustad Development Corporation applied for a PUD and rezoning
for office and industrial uses across Co. Rd. 1 from the M & K Addition . The
City approved the Hustad PUD and rezoning request to Office ( Ord. # 297) in
October , 1975.
The city has reviewed the Metropolitan Airports Commission Master Plan for
Flying Cloud Field and recommended that no significant improvements be made to
the airport and suggested it retain its General Utility Classification .
The current application , by Gunnar Electric, is for rezoning from Rural to I-2
Park for the remaining parcel in the M & K Addition,( the eastern 200 feet ),
approximately 2.3 acres.
y�•;u
•
N • i. ,,•t '' Iji•Z 4 \ . t! ft .
S as J 1_:r.. ^
•
_ ._. % •kwi r •
.
•
Is \:.\\ . :!..• ,.
.4) :• :...: .� � ,,.y ,o 5 pia -.`
Isn.. .,
a
k• :� !: ': t -\
t
( ?
�! '. JtJOt .
•
Staff Report- Gunnar Electric -2- March 9, 1977
AREA PLANNING
Figure I, illustrates the approved land development surrounding the Gunnar '
rezoning request. The proposed rezoning would add to the existing
industrial development along Co. Rd. 1. The residential use of Mr. Schaitberger's,
•
east of the Gunnar proposal, is the only residential land use in the immediate
vicinity.
r f
uY
lr_ '� 1 4,ry\; + 4M1.4Z ga^rj
sf'
iii
• i i _— i ' •
• i 1 - Y�
/ - .i � . [ �'":_._ :....
M aaraw Caw.
1
4`IS 2.
. v
i , ••
L.%
.711 . .
1.-
•::: 1 „. . •.• .
. i
.'.
• , . .
.1 .
... ...1... ..... .,....., .,,, :
11 i;... „.., QY' • • .
••• ..
e-/• •.., • , , .... , •...., , .
1 7..,..t j
, '
8 004f, ''',..]; :,. - --- .—S 1 i ' 1 7 '..,‘
, .;7:::\:,...:7, _..:. •:,-.4:..i.)!3,::. : ;.j'. : -. . .--11 ',
. ; ,'" ,,, 4. x- IA'I • ' t
,
-- t-
s-
1 „,-•'cilt 1 '.. oir
-- — ..— _____7_. ____.-.. _.-- --------.141116.
\ & .,-.•
to , SI:
-.
---.
- •,.•
_.....;.,. ,..- _ 7- - — ...41 ., :?. -- 1-1:. ,
.4 _....._
--:-.. .....s.,.,,,,.: , , .
: !;."-,i_ . —tm------' 1 It
;1
,...........,__,....oigm_•;.__.._...sfrr__... 1,,1 77.1c ''
s . i
•
-,* • ii, .., ;„,.„.:N-„ ,
1 1 i
i
-6•„ / sL.A.,:- \\',:.., lis' i-ct;11
7t 6 \-. \ ,_, ..i" ttz • '
.. , .
,, ••, - 4, z..-. • c
• •,;\ ...: ,.:. IL__
r,)\-----1
0H11
i , •
. ,
/41 •
,: •
• ______ • t (
•:.
,
I 144.. s!
NN• , ,,,,; ; .
. G., ,i..2 i\N i. •
• \ ,
, 1--k:::-':•-..;'.
ii.;• s - .4 p• — :'.... . "I
.
i . 1 4
.I: '.•..
' t /
.• N\''
41P4k4r %4r.1' i
.1 4
I Tti:,
rt
i--. 1
-1— 1,,,. -L....._$'; ' •
`..
i..1 ::: ,
to:. ,,, '
Staff Report-Gunnar Electric -3- March 9, 1977 •
TRANSPORTATION
Figure III represents two alternate alignments for Co. Rd. 1 and 169 intersection.
Currently the State Highway Department and Hennepin County are considering improve-
ments to the intersection in 1978 . The'City has talked with the Metropolitan
Airports Commission concerning the location of the proposed improvements
and they seem agreeable to such alignments.
Under either alignment, 1 or 2 , the proposed Gunnar site would not be affected
other than switching the major frontage from existing right-of-way to possibly
the rear portion of the lots today based upon alternate 2's alignment.
h ^ „ram r,
(10,.) . .. may „� ;' 2
�
1�1t \ ( 1
�� i ,. t ro1 •"�• .. •
� )
per
•
cid. til i
fN'•v i,,L
. i 9''J• �y I YP.�7•tt,.
Lj1 q .
y
`l
s:
Staff Report-Gunnar Electric. -4- March 9, 1977 y
i
GUIDE PLAN 1
The Comprehensive Guide Plan of 1968 viewed a realignment of US 169 and
potential for commercial uses over this area. ' Figure IV represents
the GuOc Plan uses for this area.
,,,..71!,' r
I ;
'7.-'
L-----,......„
,.._.:„..„-1- --, : .1
,4 ,
, ,
,,,, , ., , ,
_ ..
,..___.
Today with reconsideration of airport expansion, no realignment of US 169
as proposed in 1968 and the existing intersection, concepts of the 1968 plan
require rethinking.
i
SUMMARY
The city in the past two years has considered finalizing the plans for the
quadrants around the US 169/ Co. Rd. 1 intersection . As recently as February, 1
1977 the city approved planning for the northwest quadrant of the intersection
with the Miley Sprinkler System's industrial request. In 1975 the city
reviewed and adopted a PUD for Hustad's north of Co. Rd. 1 for office and
industrial development. The city has reviewed the master planning work
proposed by MAC for Flying Cloud Airport and recommended the airport not undergo
major expansion. The area in the southeast quadrant, which today includes 3
industrial buildings, the drive-in converted to a milk store, the Schaitberger • i
home and vacant property, remain somewhat of a question in terms of overall
development.
Much of this question has evolved around road realignments, particularly the
Co. Rd. 1 alignment as illustrated in Figure III. The two alignments being
considered by highway planning agencies will allow the city and landowners
to make some final determinations as to the extent of industrial development
and the transitioning of that development to other uses •
OS S
Staff Report-Gunnar Electric -5- March 9, 1977
The Schaitberger property adjacent to the proposed industrial site is affected
by the city and landowner decisions. It appears there are 3 options for
Mr. Schaitberger and the city
'. To plan for future office or industrial use of Mr. Schaitberger's
and adjacent properties with zoning and land use changed at the
request of the property owners ( Figure V ).
A `ti l 4. ..,..
• . .a.A I
•P
/ ' ^1! "V Vim' ! „$.,..; C0
•l i ,_.
---tfp... ..;.::,.:' ,,,, ' '. r --,...-_,,,,00/' '.. I )i, p
_.L......--- , .. ...
. , 7 :
. .
., . Lift,f_,..0.41,..J.
. .
..
:. ,
‘ —4* .. 4
t wsa..,a,... ,. - /7
"�. , yC
.V.3.4, 1
1 • I
/'.4 Fi I I
2. Restrict further industrial development of the M B K Addition
by zoning the 2.3 Gunnar site to residential consistent
with Mr. Schaitberger's single family use.
3. Zone the Gunnar site industrial and provide significant buffer
treatment between the Schaitberger home and the industrial site
restricting industrial development to that point and single family
development on Mr. Schaitberger's property and the property to
the east . ( Figure VI , following page ).
I
I
I
..... —
i
x ,
• .1) . 1
1 .
•
. .. .
—1 , ..,i •
_____..___, .r.1 41,..i'',7•.; 1 ,-... • — ', "". i . ,.., ...,:'.;;;,. :. ''' ..il. ' ;
I • .5 , ., • ...: ;:,,,, ;
X. •-•- ••(cort• •
0 •
•
ii... ••,,:..:,-',..... „,•-` 7,....:,.: .''. . ,,.;. 1 .,,..,,':i •Z
•4
..... t • ..
,,t.,;:;- -•'!' -.,.::.- : ..: -) -,'.f•-;..,:,......'.....'. Z` .'•
-•1,-. -:',.: ..',1.,!! :J.:j ,..'..'I.F i','.i;-:.- . i,', - - ,
i.-...., .:.,:.i.i^....,., ' .;,.,'-.-:.'- 'v ,•, -" .1. 15. '
:, ......,,,J,.. '; . .A.0.411 0.4., '::-... t.i.,N. , i... • •I
•
,..
i
•,, i,•
.o.'
',.. • .. ,,.. _/— — ---‘,:Ii s-- . .
....1. -,
1.4 A
f .
........
„...
4 ,
.....,
..t
•
•
•
1 ,.,
r
*sc., ie • . '':-
- \ - g _
3
•
,.',...
1 ..• .
a
o,,.', • ,._ .„.
- •. - '/",- ; _, Ai.
" •,.. i.
•
•
, 4, lain
. _
p - .
e
i•
/i .i' •
,. . ...._... ,..,
1.
. , .-t i•,,.Zli .,.1 in
-} 3
1 . ,.t.,...:„......„ i %
,t•.;;;•", N.,,,,,
-LC
! , •
'II'. •I` i \\:,--:,
1 - Of/ "I •••:,,.
t• ..,
,.
.\_-:. :, *:,(1-
...: , tzz. a __ ,-..,,,,,,-•-•- ,<\,,,,..„,,,,t
•S' .Z.44.I,"' /
, 1 1
- — - i .Z, /
Vt t
- .
-
/ .
.
•.
.... __ .• •
41S1
Staff Report- Gunnar Electric -6- March 9, 1977
RECOMMENDATIONS
The planning staff would recommend the proposed request for rezoning to
I - 2 Perk by Gunnar Electric be approved subject to building placement
design and landscaping that will not detract from the existing single family
home owned by Mr. Schaitberger.
The staff would recommend the city consider future zonings at the request of
the property owners affected to include for future industrial use Mr. Schaitberger's
and a portion of the adjacent Wolfe property as depicted on Figure V' utilizing
the slope and future realignment of Co. Rd. 1 as the definition or boundary of
the industrial/office area.
Our recommendation is based upon the realities of existing development along
Co. Rd. 1 , the planned office/industrial park of Hustad's, the existing
topography along Co. Rd. 1, the proximity to the flight path of runway 27 ,
the noise of major roadways and airport upon single family development in the
area and the greatest flexibility for future site development. •
DP:jj
•
y'j s'
-
. ri1*.fi
4ti?
•
OpEE, TiQA/L
O ( / fr .
._- •
y , _ _ `„' ta.ces q0 sv,44,o 1
20' , I I I
l
v
•
SITE PLAN 1444o ,4 e c,j• , ^
-`4.4 M' v
s i r't, b y
• 'C.
....._._., i•i r,..'ff.,17';;,..,.: •,j... .',.4•:. , , •
I NI
1 12 CARS PAR XiNy -.
:!All, ;.er,....Q
4.
C6lN'A.IQ S e#✓
II4LVD Aa7v to-77-1-op I •
• j. 3 ACPcNs i _ — —
t
y1;9
GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO.,INC.
• 7960 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD
EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343
Phone: 941.1462
•
//8/77
Ref• Gunnarson
Land Development L0-77-2-09
2.3 cerise
In talking to Carl Julie of the sewer department, it was noted that the sewer
line is on the corner directly east of the site and would not be brought up to
serve the building untill the land across the street was developed further. A
holding tank was se3usted, in checking into this we found that a 3000 gal tank
would be the most practical, as the pumping trucks have a capacity of 3000 gallons
and the cost per pumping is the same to that point. The amount of water used with
water saving touts would result in one pumping every two weeks. We plan to do
screening to the east as not to take away from the residence to the east.
Sincerely
Clayton Gunnarson
•
II'?'0
' 12880 Pioneer Trail,
Bien Prairie, Minn. 55343
. . . ?larch 25, 1977.
The Planning Co-eiscion
$ City of Eden Prairie
Bien Prairie, Minnesota. '
{ Dear Members,
When I asked the Pla^airs C, ission for an extention on the rezoning
proposal of the parcel of lend i.=aaiatcly adjacent to the West of my
residence, it was for the purpose of looldng into the natter at greater dotal
•
I have done thin and what follo.s is a se -cry of information I feel in
• pertinent to any decision that the Conaission will Lave to make on the Fropo ..
I am enclocine, a copy of Resolution #345 that was adopted by the
Village Council in i•ay of 1970. In it the reasons are given for denying
a co.plete zoning to irdurtr;al uses of the M & K addition. I feel that
those reasons for the most part are still valid.
The Staff Report dated Fhrch 9, 1977 that I received at the March Wee
meeting and the presentation of it to the Cczroiwsion by 'r. Putman suggested,
to me at least, that the reasons listed in p_ragraph three of the report ha:.
been resolved end therefore this was a plies for the land to be rezoned. I d_•.
not agree with the proaoccd rc,:lirn-..ent of Picaoer .fail Where it intersects
State Highway 1 9 an it wceld d_astica.Uy effect property I own at that sit::-
Follcuing the alarming eeet.tree I reoucstcd neetines with the people concere f
with the project on the State end County levels. Trou;h these meetings I
found that this u7*rnei.ng p.ojcc: cnid he m r e god by the State highway dope
cent with in-rut by pia p1en:ior and henenepin County. I as enclosing a copy c•:
a letter I rceeivod from the »reject usta,cr, Mr. Allan Pint, whore he write::
that no definite read has Lscn Ludt$ at.till time. Cc.asictuontly
10311evn UmL cagy tiFF'cnnniiL fur 1g4c441.n4 4ivn.0 the road sillKanlailL iN Ci IiPihp
le nut a valid one.
In reference to pn_arraeh four of the Staff Report pertaining to tho
Iiustad PUM rezcnir.^ approval by the City of Lien Prairie of property across
•
Pioneer Tr it i'co the II & is z;i;E:.:ica. I believe that any plans they might
have for that property would in pen: expend on a definite road alignment of
Pioneer ;5'ail. In this I believe taey would concur.
In conclusion, it is my feoii.n7 that a razcain� to industrial use of
the Gunner il.eatric rescainl proposal cn the 14is K addition be again denied
until such time that many if no; all of the reasons listed in Resolution #
are met.
In the hope that tho in'cr=ition I have been able to relay to you
in this letter will be of sone help to the Ccrmission in this matter, I ros.i.c ,
eT • ,..
H• arold-L. Schnitberger�
((
1 •
•
t>NNFSOTq '
Minnesota Department of Transportation
•
District 5
OF IRO2055 No.Lilac Drive
Golden Valley,Minnesota 55422 • (612)545.3761
March 22, 19"7 • • • • .
▪ Mr. Harold Schaitberger
12880 Pioneer Trail : : . -- . ;. ,. : '
• Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
In reply refer to: 315
▪ S.P. 2744-28 (T.11. 159) '
At the Intersection with .
CSAH 1 in Eden Prairie, Hennepin County
•
to Mr. Sehn1.tbnrvlsV: . .
• As we discussed yesterday morning, I am writing this letter to again indi-
cate our present position and stage of development regarding the upgrading
of the above referenced intersection.
At present we are considering several alternatives for the upgrading of
this intersection. We are concerned, as you are, with improving the safety
of this hazardous intersection. Our primary purpose in upgrading this
intersection is to reduce accidents and congestion at this intersection
and to improve the flow of traffic.
Since all the alternates under consideration require additional right of
way, an opportunity for a public hearing will be offered some time this
summer. As I indicated yesterday, final alignment and geometric revisions
proposed, oust be arprcvcd by both Hennepin County and the City of Eden •
Prairie prier to tha start of any construction. Presently this project is
scheduled for letting in t:ovenber 1976.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss this further, call me at
545-3761, Ext. 119.
Sincerely,
d'e;.4/7!"4 i- 03;" .
Allan E. Pint
Project Manager
AEr:sb •
A. Equal O,,porrunrry Employe, •
• .C31.9 tf'7 4 1
• 1 1
•
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
• HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 345
•
A RESOLUTION DENYING THE APPLICATION OP GEORGE MAUER
''::+..... .. - FOR REZONING OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, M & K ADDITION
WHEREAS, George Mauer did on January 13, 1970 apply for a rezoning fr..
Rural (RU) to Industrial (I-2-PRX) of Lot 2, Block 1, M & K Addition; and •
WHEREAS, the Zoning and Planning Commission of the Village of Eden Pr%
• by action dated April 7, 1970 did recommend the denial of said rezoning, and
WHEREAS, the Council of the Village of Eden Prairie did on January 13,
•
1970, April 14, 1970 and April 28, 1970 consider said application and hear t':.
argument of applicant and his attorney, and j I
WHEREAS, the Village on October 14, 1969 did enact Ordinance No. 135
which ordinance establishes a comprehensive zoning plan for the Village and
which urdinanj a it+ 414 4411 #.9144- 8i{4 F1}'f:{i :404
UNPNRAN, the lut,d Invniv.'d in sold appilratl.nt la ranted Mira/ (101),.7oa.
WIII IINA::, Lies said Ordinance ,io. 135 vas adopted to protect the public
health, safety and general welfare of the inhabitants of said Village, and
WHEREAS, no utilities exist for immediate connections, further develop•..
of industrial uses should not be permitted without utility service, and
WHEREAS, an area study should be completed before any rezoning is condc:'
around the intersection of County Road No. 1 and Plying Cloud Drive because of
uncertainties as to alignment and grades of the two roads as well as the
proliferation of uncoordinated industrial development, and • II
•
.
...._ _.�.w....�._..,.... _.y...._.�r__.. ._._._._. . .
•
T
.tr
;iREAS, the proposed development is inconsistent with the objectives '
:<...of the comprehensive guide plan in that it tends to expand an area of industrial
uses•further into what has been designated for residential use, and '
.
WHEREAS, the adjacent properties are presently zoned and occupied as ` 1
residential properties,
.. 1'OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of
.Eden Prairie:
Thar based on the foregoing the application for the rezoning of tot 2i ..
Block 1, M A K Addition from Rural (KO) to Industrial (I-2-PRK) be denied.
. . ADOPTED by the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie this
. '. day of May, 1970.
TdW. Osterholt, Mayor
r
Attest: �o'. .
. George C. Hite, Manager
Edna Hc,imgren, Clerk
1
•
•
June 14, 1977
CITY or LDEE PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-79
RESOLUTION VACATING RIEMAN
ROAD FROM COMMERCE WAY TO
MARTIN DRIVE
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has a right-of-way over the
following described land:
Rieman Road, as platted in Edenvale
Industrial Park 2nd Addition, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, between Commerce
Way and Martin Drive, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 14, 1977, as required
by law, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that said right-of-way is not
necessary and that it would be in the public interest that it be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council
as follows:
1. The above described land is hereby vacated.
2. A certified copy of this resolution shall be prepared by
the City Clerk and shall be a notice of completion of the
proceedings and shall be recorded in accordance with
M.S.A. 117.19.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
y'65
•
•
•
•
•
Unapproved
Planning Commission -4- May 2:, 1977
•
D. Rieman Road Vacation, located in Edenvale Industrial Par). 2nd Addition.
Mr. Peterson stated the industrial park was approved 2 years ago for small light
industrial uses. He stated the uses do not require Rieman Road and he has 100:
petition of the users to vacate Rieman Road.
The planner informed the commission the vacation could leave some of the lots
with no access to a public street. He stated the City Engineer and he are
recommending vacation of the street and a replat of the lots to insure all have
frontage onto a public street.
Mr. Peterson replied the staff's suggestion is acceptable.
Motion:
Redpath moved, Retterath seconded, to recommend approval of the Rieman Road vacation
contingent upon the proponent filing a new plat by June 1s, 1977. Motion carried
unanimously.
•
l//6G
MEMO
TO: Mayor Fenzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
•
DATE: June 8, 1977
SUBJECT: Vacation of Rieman Road
On May 3, 1977, the Council received a petition and set a hearing date
of June 14 for the vacation of Rieman Road between Commerce Way and
Martin Drive. On May 23 the Planning Commission reviewed this matter
and recommended vacating the road, subject to a replatting of Block 2
of the Edenvale Industrial Park 2nd Addition, to assure proper access
for all parcels abutting Rieman Road. A public hearing for such re-
platting is scheduled for the June 13 Planning Commission meeting.
The proposed replat shows the lots combined such that all will have
frontage on a public street.
It is recommended that on favorable recommendation from the Planning
Commission that the City Council adopt Resolution No. vacating
Rieman Road from Commerce Way_to Martin Drive.
CJJ:kh
U'167
J
_ _ {ems c
1 ; L . ' . •-..
1 .n V3 C - ems„ oq' -+�-_.1.C=, C
: ,....o • .,„,.`Pos,: ,,,N,.....<... " .'..:---•:::.,:•''' CP<'' . _ . 47.- = .
''' h
o F, i2 ^s tea
i L .... , ,' : F�� Fo ,c. •
N / h
t �' .h r S ?(.w' ?ZOo0J5 OE
I CO "*,' 'i.:r :u lit.'�
4 ' O r' Cs s •C
I g'C' 7 "` So,
N ?Z0000S Si'.'� '� _ 61 t`+ _ I o
sO
•
o A
.n < 99t L (IJ _ 1 .
I W - > ! 1
= 1O fz ZSf n+vSe15 L�1 f
o _ cr
ml
C j N 1C L . .o c' •y, ., 1
to > Z 1 W( .'p y.. ' . i- < 1a ' .VI
_ N
P: 0 t.t w O M 0,1..
LY T N O
NIr , 1
`�iaf T 1 1 sl ccl '` :•
J., F-• - c c.e'r, �„ .V 1. ..: 1 L 3 Z00ie05 5'""• S i -
I n N o Q IG
','n
"jDF::' EF� 1051, or.:
.•�2,�. i• OD� c 3..?:.a"Fg2N !'£0: _
•
1 E‘4 !
n
\! :3/,
c 1 O
s� ygGB 1 M
•
mmo
TO: Mayor Pen:;cl and Members of the City Council
TH)OUSH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
•
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer L;`!
DATE: April 28, 1977 ' ill
SUBJECT: Vacation of Rieman Road
The attached petition was submitted by Mr. R. Sather who has applied for a
permit to construct a machine shop on Lot 16, Block 2 of Edenvale Industrial
Park 2nd Addition.
•
The proposed site plan shows some of the required parking to be located within
the required setback from Rieman Road, which is a platted public street. If
Rieman Road were vacated, the parking setback would not be a problem.
it is recommended that the City Council receive this petition and adopt Reso-
lution Mo. 77-62 ordering a public hearing for June 7, 1977.
Since all the abutting property owners involved have signed the petition and.
there are no inpiace utilities, the proponent has asked for permission to •
begin construction on his building prior to the formal vacation. We in-
formed Mr. Peterson from Edenvale, Inc., we would bring this to the Council's
attention.
CJJ:kh
Attachment
•
• ,
PETITION
March 29, 1977
We, the undersigned, constituting 100% of the effected and abutting property
owners abutting Rieman Road hereby declare that such road is not needed for
access to such property and therefore does not benefit such property. We
hereby petition the City of Eden Prairie to vacate the street right of way of
Rienan Road in its entirety.
Property Owner Legal Description •
Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Edenvale
Edenvale, Inc. Industrial Park 2nd Addition
Edenvale, lnc. Lot 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 2, Edenv::_
Industrial Park 2nd Addition
•
i/+'.�,% ,f •/ � / , y v� `i'
By , .
•Cencre1—Ia.ectric`ee-i-eai Systems Lot 13 and 14, Block 2, Edenvale
i1 p ,` ) 1 ,t, L Industrial Park 2nd Addition
.1
Richard Satter Lot 15 and 16, Block 2, Edenvale
Industrial Park 2nd Addition
•
•
I
. •- . .. %: .',• .. 1
• .;'; .' •
• • • . -,
c. .,. • . •
:--. , .., .., .s,•
i \ •••• 0 ''," s.,,,,
••••••..
:, V•:•. • . •' '4.•..-: • ••• ••••; •• •• •
. • t:. et' \ ,,,..,'''• •••:`,.1. •
. '5 ,,-,i:5.::::::•.);:, - .0 ,„ ,
• "
. ..,...1 . .-
4" -' 6 • 6 1." 7:>;•
0 •
• ....I -.., 'i 6 e. • • "ts ,
, i ; •;,:.
Zi
I to . ,2•.-1.„ : •t, •• ' ,
v. ' . •
-..1 • ••• IA J.:4:: 64' ''.° '.,s›...„.
-1:5•; :• Ps . 12 -... :•', C.:.0 PO •1
..... ...•., ,• .A...
.... -....
• 4•• .,,r. ..,..0,0
I . s c.../ ..•:li:?45- ` ` 41.•
e...7?,"74, . LP, 1 35133 2 5;
.... • .•:-,.1........ ,
5., I 403.I II Z*52'5,3"E
:yi "'-/5.01 r,•'... ,•,:-.`"--ii-6,-,-COMMc-..1'-'1C, -'..---__.i... -•:'- ' '"15' ' ,? .'0,,,c,-
GO n•to :. +3;!--73---;4:::::"P., -1 -
..:,....Z...
cr..: •?.' ‹ • <. , .:. •
,
;•-• _ ;,-, .;:'•!.-J. ••• i c*- ''• '
1 :'' u•
_:!•: ia,4, '7... " .3.e'r.• .
. 183 87 ' ,-;•`''• .•?"*'),* ' /.. 4.- . ''' -":".• ',,\.-,V: i•.'.• '•;* ''IV I 0
t...., ,..0 6_ f z....., „.....,,........0.7 ....,..,,Ii... .•7‘....,Ne.s_cf,......,1
to ....,..., 3?• . rs, 0 Z.' '-^ 2...,, 1. •1-..,,,, .... 5:,..7 ;.;:. .
. -
- "-) -;> tg.f.14 ; .7:. 0•:•,.....0,-it ''.;, Z ...'4-'3 i ..../
.5 5000075 ....._ _,
. I:•,,-_-,----_, • -r1 -, . .i.... 4•••••1:,• -• cis, ..... t•'.• .
k,.•rt, ‘,.• • • .• - - - ;0 . - ." ,g•,..• --- 3: ,.,.:
•...2.: ; ';,-•"5;5'1 4.:VI 4 e Z • ti • . 7.Pe .1:.' •tct-O ;
e'", .?,..•-'''7• :-• in - •
I
!' I
i63 •• i , 4..
..J
:1 •, • '."' ....,,-.) .s -
- ill
0 rn .
•
:, ".:-• i ii. na 0 •VI i Z 7 • •
. .• 1-••
•
r. ,i— '.. _...., r,, , _.,. c.,,.
- 1 , • • z •c--. c„
c•
u. .C.
.,•••• P••• 0, II" ' 0 1\••)i ;,':, • . o: i
I I ..."• eL ra..) lb
"-:
.0 . .i.- 0 . .... ,-- ... .
X - rri -4 • ... ,
• si;s4ltst 382.23 - • al , .: 17; 73 rn
01 , < . 0 -
I M
- I -:, ..., ifio • 2. _-
la ,7„.., 0 T j
. j
• •-' - ,
Iv
. • go r-. 11:4!..e.'- . ; .1643 • •:11-t • .
••s••,-
'•-•'-31'..IS 4::,• •-..--- .r i
•
..^. -..- Z.•C
.4-• •5 • 1
/15 5.'0002:- ,, ..-
.. •
i 4s" 0 ,
9'
z,u ,•• ,-, a'. :,.•• I G N;
........ , , , 0 0 ID • i 'I. S! I.
‘t.
INJ Cil L.
. •''' C.‘'•;-.. '/' ' .••••• • ,Z..... j.:.
•',iC i L tre•./,' g j:f..., ', / g• ,s, ....4
.1.
••••. ..--"'c- i0 5[•0::,./2 E • .. 17 ., I'',:•`:• :,1 f t.' 1 ''‘',.'" u.
•
•' r 1
,,,--
...,„ ,,,,,„ ":2,-„,,,.....,..," f •,..- .?„›,.• c,.,,., . •,• _ -3 r .. ••.,.-/... •
•e,
4. C.\. •. .• .: .,..''X..,,• ''..V.1 1.15
.,;•••,. J i• • ...,, . 4z,•:. - •..c•
•'''
0 .-..-.... •' -. -.c. c•I. • ••:.
-
',e -• •I.Zf, - ,.. r:,,: "0:'
.7. ,,t...
0 ,;.•.'•• •!".•.: ....• •, •r-.. c.• ...ii*. ..--• .`.",, .
`r • cf•• .
. •:0 ,' PI "
•••,,t.•. sr. •.(.
.. 1,
.p.. tr• -"
. ... ....._.,...- :!'i 5 l':• ' .'•• • ,i...• "'''•L .5;3;- . .f.........,
,_.; .... • ,,,,. . i'... .1'_ • II .
•
• :1.7,----- .,__ u.' • _ 1 !
• .. ..
:.1..le.,,,,,,,5 : -----.4..,, 3 A•4, 6 3
• ' .• I i CL`'•-• - C.5; . /,..7 '
. .....'2,3:i : ')C/....i•••••.7.....
4.. •; . L''
--.... Ai
, i.,..
'-RO• •-.3 ,0.....1..' • -..
-.__... .
. !1.•4; ;., .4'•3
..
.i • 'Zs
I
j
EDENVALE,INC.
7766 Mitchell Road•Eden Prairie,Minn. 55343•612/941-5300
May 16, 1977
Mr. Carl Jullie
City Engineer
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Mr. Jullie;
Enclosed is a drawing showing the expected pattern for access to
all of the lots in Edenvale Industrial Park 2nd Addition upon the
completion of the vacation of Rieman Road.
The petition for vacation of this road has been signed by the
owners of 100Z of the affected properties and it is agreed by all
concerned that construction of such road would not benefit the
properties but would he an unnecessary expense which would actually
be a detriment to all concerned.
A summary of the access to all lots follows. Lots 1 and 2 are
separately owned and have access from Martin Drive. Lots 3, 4, 13
and 14 are owned by general Electric Medical Systems who have their
access from Martin Drive so separate access is needed for Lots 13
and 14. Lots 5, 6, 7 and 10, 11 and 12 will be developed •jointly
into 2 or 3 building sites with joint: parking and access roads from
Martin Drive. No access will be needed from Rieman Road. Lots 8 and
• 9 both front on Martin Drive and access will be gotten from Martin
Drive only. Lots 15 and 16 are owned by Sather Engineering Company
who will build both lots into one building plan. A future expansion
may run into Lot 15 but access will be from Commerce Way,
Please proceed with the vacatixi of this road as soon as possible so
plans can be finalized for the remainder of this subdivision.
Yours truly, z.
4-Donald R. Peterson
DRP/sr
Encl. toi 9
€ N.1°51r41"E. is �-...�
---453,00— II it
1 r Y,�er irrjh fs/4��r/
[ r __ , .: ..c477„, , .
,1 �a TE • !7 $
i
4 r fr �9
a ° )VJ I T ,, �f
Th N• ~�+
A { 1 T a S• Il Qom`_1 Iflh I 1�.�1 'V x Y =4'1::
—... I
I vy A212,..
L,
.115 45
,-... h
ri
1 d
C.' C.., ~`
\ ,
c„.
i 1 , O W
• �Illillllll c, �,, ....'i�r s,,..„„„r ,., ,, . A
IEJ
. i
IF 1 ,
a \
-10 :.,\�\L,. \ I` i ;, 'S•'• 59"wry
\��\\e�v t) v .0\\\\—mil 1 1 g
\ v ��I \ L
\ Lllli' � —s
+ r\ -- wN »�
•
/a►isl, / .y
20c 7s"
• �sa3Q•97., J �=
•
r,� �:,
i., „_,,,,
ti , Ni...•,s,_.,,g.„„, /i,-•
.
117`7.� '1,1/�4 \ oti v_-•
whp/.ih 6/7/77
•
REZONING AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed in triplicate this _day of
1977 by and between HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Minnesota
corporation, hereinafter called "Developer,"
hereinafter called "Owner" and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal
corporation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called "City"; and
WHEREAS, Developer and Owners have requested the City Council of the
City of Eden Prairie for concept approval of a P.U.D. plan known as "The
Bluff Country" and to change the zoning of a tract of land included therein
from Rural to RM 13.5 for an area known as Bluffs West consisting of
approximately 200 acres which is legally described as more fully set out on
Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, it is believed that granting concept approval and the rezoning
of said Bluffs West area to RM 13.5 will be in the public interest, welfare
and convenience of the people of the City of Eden Prairie; and
WHEREAS, Developer and Owners agree to develop the aforementioned Bluffs
West as a RM 13.5 area in consideration of the City's changing of the zoning
to RN 13.5 and the Developers and Owners further agree as a part of said
consideration to lay out, plat, develop and maintain the areas so rezoned
generally and in accordance with the concept plan heretofore presented to
the City as set forth by Owner's Request which booklet is dated March 20,
1977 and which is made a part hereof marked Exhibit B.
NOW, THEREFORE, this Agreement witnesseth that for and in consideration
of the City Council of the City adopting an ordinance changing the zoning
1
from Rural to RM 13.5 and of the mutual benefits to each of the parties
hereto, the parties, their respective successors and assigns do hereby
covenant and agree as follows:
1. That concept approval of the area known as "The Bluffs
Country" as shown on Exhibit B is given except the area
designated Bluffs East in Exhibit B is not given any
specific housing unit density approval.
2. That the following variances in the area designed as Bluffs
West will be granted:
a. 15 - 20 percent of the lots may be less than 13,500.
square feet.
b. That the lot width may be less than 90 feet.
c. Minimum side yard set backs shall be:
5' - garage
10' - 1 to 11 story living area
15' - 2 story living area.
3. That the owners and developers grant to the City options to
purchase the areas shown on the site plan identified as public
acquisition on Exhibit B and subject to the further condition
- that in the event the options are not exercised by the City
the Purgatory Creek area shall be subject to the constraints
as set forth in the Purgatory Creek study done by the City and
dated wherein conservancy zones are delineated
for open space protection.
4. That portions of lots be subject
to a conservancy easement for open space protection to the
extent that the lots have conservancy zone land as delineated
by the Purgatory Creek Study.
5. That the two "wash areas" as shown on the site plan be
incorporated as a part of adjacent lots but subject to a
conservancy easement prohibiting development and improvement
by the owners.
6. That no concept approval or zoning isgranted to the area
identified as institutional in Area G and the most northerly
eight lots of Area G as shown on the site plan of Exhibit B.
-2-
7. That owners and developers grant the City an option to
purchase land identified as neighborhood park site and as
shown on Exhibit C.
8. That all sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities,
concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing whether to be
public or private, shall be designed to City Standards by a
Registered Professional Civil Engineer and submitted to the
City Engineer for approval. The developer, through his
engineer, shall provide for competent daily inspection of all
street and utility construction, both private and public.
As-built drawings with service and valve ties on reproducable
mylar and certificates of completion and compliance with
specifications shall also be delivered to the City Engineer.
The developer also agrees to pay all fees for City Engineering
and administrative services consistent with current City
requirements.
FURTHER CITY AND PROPERTY OWNERS AGREE:
1. That the property owners shall comply with all applicable rules,
regulations, ordinances and laws of the City of Eden Prairie.
2. That the provisions of this agreement shall be binding upon and
enforceable against Owner, its successors and assigns, and upon all sub-
sequent owners, their respective heirs, successors and assigns of the
property herein described.
3. That an executed copy of this Agreement shall be recorded with
the Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
4. That if Owner fails to proceed in accordance with this agreement
within twenty-four (24) months from the date hereof, owner, for itself,
its successors and assigns agree that it will not oppose the rezoning of
said property back to its Rural zoning.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this agreement have caused these
presents tobe executed the day and year aforesaid.
-3-
4774
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal
corporation of the State of Minnesota
BY:
Its Mayor
Its Manager
HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a
Minnesota corporation
BY:
BY:
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 1977 by Wolfgang Penzel, the Mayor and by Roger Ulstad, the
City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation
on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 1977 by and
-4-
•
of the Hustad Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation on behalf
of the corporation,
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY.OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 1977 by its and by
its of
on behalf of the corporation,
Notary Public
- yI
-5-
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Conmunity Services A. •
SUBJECT: Bluffs Oevelopment Proposal--PARK ASPECTS
DATE: June 10, 1977
SCHOOL DISTRICT REACTION TO NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SITES
I've reviewed, with Paul Schee, the 2 "selected" neighborhood park sites
to serve the S. E. area of Eden Prairie:
1. The Franlo/County 1 site (17± acres).
2. The Homeward Hills site (20t acres).
His reactions were:
. Both seem to be well-located for possible neighborhood elementary
school sites.
. Both seem to be of adequate size given the topo, etc.
. There may well be a need for only 1 (maybe none) more school
in this part of Eden Prairie (assuming the Preserve site is
used).
• . The Homeward Hills site must be outside of the Airport approach
zone.
The future use of the Airport may affect the school use potential
of the Homeward Hills site. If jet traffic increases the noise
may make a school unfeasible.
The Franlo/1 site could be either in the N. E. or S. E. corner
of the intersection.
. We should plan for safe, easy pedestrian access so students can
"walk in".
I advised Mr. Schee that the City would be acquiring this property for
neighborhood park purposes utilizing the CASH PARK FEE and that if and
when there was a need for a school on either or both sites the District
could "buy in" at a then agreed upon price.
On A
•
•
•
-2-
Bluffs June 10-77
ACQUISITION OF THE CREEK CORRIDOR PARCELS
If the Council wishes to proceed to try to acquire these parcels using
available grant programs I'd suggest we pursue the following:
1. Federal LAWCON/State Natural Resource Funding.
2. Metropolitan Council Regional Trail Funding.
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission has recommended
that either or both be solicited. It is possible that 100% funding
can be obtained thru the Metro Council sooner than 75A funding can be
obtained thru the Federal/State option. The 1977 session of the State
Legislature passed the 1978-79 Outdoor Recreation Bonding Program
which included 51.1 million for Regional Trail Corridor Acquisition and
Development. Purgatory Creek is currently indentifed as a Regional Trail
Corridor.
1978 LAWCON applications will be due soon and an increased appropriation
is expected. While 1.5 times as much money may be available it's likely
that the Metro Council will again limit the maximum amount of any one grant
to 5100,000. At this rate it will take years to do and there's no assurance
of repeat funding. Also because Purgatory Creek is on the Regional System
it may be disqualified from eligibility for Federal/State Funding. Finally,
I'd suggest that we try to secure funding for the Mitchell Lake Park from
LAWCON in 1978 and 1979 and historicallu we've been limited to one project
per year.
In order tosolicit funding we should:
1. Authorize an independent real estate appraisal. Rules and regulations
for both funding sources require that we follow the UNIFORM
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION process.
2. Authorize application filing.
3. Secure options if possible.
107g
PARK ACQUISITION PROPOSAL
Submitted by: The Bluffs Company
To: Eden Prairie City Council
The following analysis is intended to provide the City Council with economic
data that will assist them in deciding on park acquisition costs for land located
at the intersection of Franlo Road and County Road #1. in the Bluffs East and
along Homeward Hills Road and Purgatory Creek in the Bluffs West. Although the
dollar numbers utilized in this proposal refer only to Bluffs Company land, it is
assumed that the same numbers are pertinent also for that land proposed for purchase
from other parties.
It may be helpful at the outset to start with a common understanding of
three terns: Land costs, development cost and profit.
1) Land costs consist of two elements, the original purchase price and
subsequent holding costs. Presently the purchase price of Bluffs Co.
land comprises approximately 6o; of the total le.nd cost with holding
costs making up the balance of t,C1',. As of today the cost factor for
land owned by the Bluffs Co. increases approximately 10% per year, or
slightly less than per month. Holding costs are generated from
professional services, e.g. legal, surveyor, planning, and engineering
as well as taxes and penalties, assessments, interest on both the purchase
contract and on borrowed capital.
2) Develo?ment costs are expenses related directly to the improvement of
lots and are typically divided into hard costs and soft costs. Hard
costs relate to the innt::llation of the physical improvements such as
concrete work, black top road surfaces, sewer and water lines, etc. Soft
costs are comprised of professional services, governmental fees, project
management, financing fees, interest and assessments.
•
3) Profit is a term that needs to be defined within a specific situation
to be meaningful. As it relates to The Bluffs'Company the term can be
qualified two ways, firstly, as gross or net profit and secondly, es
corporate or investor profit. Gross profit will here simply be pre-tax
profit while net profit will mean after-tax profit. The Bluffs Company
is a Minnesota Corporatism and hence is subject to regular corporate tax
requirements. It will be assumed here that both corporate and investor
tax brackets are at the 50u rate.
With these definitions in mind the following is an economic analysis of the
parcels of land being presently considered for acquisition from The Bluffs Company
by the City of Eden Prairie.
A. FRAM° ROAD SCHOOL-PARK SITE
Method of Fnding: By developer through building permit fees.
Acquisition Prices $13,535 per acre
In order to arrive at a reasonable acreage value for this site it will be
assumed that The Bluffs Company could develop the land in a similar configuration
as Prairie East 3rd Addition. There the net density is approximately 2.4
dwelling units per acre. If a lower density were assumed, e.g. like Prairie
East 1st Addition where the net density is 2.0 units per acre, the lot numbers
would be different but the per acre number would be comparable.
Lot Analysis
Land Cost $ 3,635.00
Purchasing price - $2,O83:00
Holding costs - 1,552.00
Development Costs 6,365.00
Hard costs - 4,300.00
Soft costs - 2,065.00
Total Cost $10,000.00
(*.ass Profit 2t000.00
Selling price of lot $12,000.00
Profit Analysis per lot
Gross profit $ 2,000.00
Corporate tax -1,000.00
Net corporate profit 1,000.00
Investor tax 500.00
Net Investor profit $ 500.E
The $13,525.00 figure was arrived at by multiplying the sum of land cost
and gross profit per lot by the net density factor.
Land cost $3,635.00
Gross profit 2,000.00
5,05.00
x 2.4
$13,525.00
B. 'BLUFFS WEST CUM( CORRIDOR SITE
Method of Funding,: Extra-Ce mmmity funds
Acquisition Price: $10,000 per acre.
After consulting with the city staff it was felt that a different
set of criteria should be used for this site than that used for the
Franlo Road site. It was suggested that the difference canes from
the fact that utilities are not presently assessed and a plat not yet
approved. The cost of the land to The BluffaCq,is not, however,
appreciable different at $8100.00 per acre because the purchase price
of all the land owned by The Bluffs Co. has been averaged. Likewise,
moat holding costs, with the exception of assessments, have been spread
equally on all its acreage. Adding $1900.00 per acre for developers
gross profit, the sale price to the city would be $10,000 per acre. I
feel confident that the other parties potentially involved in park
acquisition in this area would be amenable to this price for their land
also.
Respectfully submitted by:
(th2c4iL
Wallace H. Busted, President
The Bluffs Company
4i81
June 14:107
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-46
•
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
•
Bluff's West
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Bluff's West
, dated April 11, 1977 , a copy of
which is attached hereto and amended as follows:
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of
the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and
amendments thereto and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
•
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
•
•
4�5C;�
•
t i1t
deve[o o ment
corporat on
To: Eden Prairie City Council
Re: Bluffs West
Dear Council Members: .
Attached is a copy of the new plat of Bluffs West. As requested at
our last meeting, we have made the following changes:
1) The number of lots smaller than 13,500 sq. ft. have been •
reduced from 29% to 14.0.
2) The lots behind Mr. Brekke's have been chanced, one lot was
omitted to allow construction on more gentle slopes.
3) The gap or open space that existed alon7 the ravines has now
been closed by extending lot lines.
q) Although it has not changed on this preliminary plat, the lots
to the very north by tr. Lyken's house will be finally platted
as an outlot.
If you have any questions about this plat or desire any more information
prior to the meeting, please call me.
i lm
i erely:
ini
Ostenson
JO/er
y?c Afi •
12750 PIONEER TRAIL EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343(612)941-4383
• O.
m
m
f i a- cs-
e ,
Lcl 41
1_ r..pL _ a1'/
h 11 c1J g
C". l Q.
— e2ell
1 -S
W N
\ t3 W •11 1
.03 _ ,P S L .fd`
ASP ns' ,Sc• .
M Z. `h
L,
7
•
r
b V
u° • /
M
i
06 n3
V e )
O
171
' I
June 1+, 1977
•
CITY OF EILSN I'FJ+IF,IE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77,64
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF Golf
•
Vista Addition
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Golf Vista
Addition bated warch, 1977 , a copy of
which is attached hereto and amended as follows:
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of
the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and
amendments thereto and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on •
• Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
a
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
•
4'I 83
whp/Jh 4/21/77
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 77-15
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 135.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended
by adding to Section 14, Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
See attached Exhibit A,
which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone and shall be
included hereafter in the RM 2.5 zone.
Subdivision 2. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding
to Section 14, Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
See attached Exhibit B,
which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone and shall be
included hereafter in the RM 6.5 zone.
Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the terms
and conditions of that certain Rezoning Agreement dated , 1977
entered into between Covenant Living Centers of Minnesota, Inc. and the
City of Eden Prairie, which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and
shall further be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of
the City relating to such RM 2.5 and RM 6.5 zones.
Section 3. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage
and publication.
47�U
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie this _ day of , 1977 and finally read and
adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of
said City on the day of , 1977.
Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Published in the Eden Prairie News on the_ day of , 1977.
_2-
473S
•
DESCRIPTION FOR ZONING
PARCEL B: HIGH DENSITY APARTMENTS AND NURSING UNIT
•
A tract of land lying and being in the County of Hennepin and the Stote of Minnesota,
described as follows,to-wit:
•
That part of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 116, Range
22,described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said North Half of the Southwest Quarter;thence on
a bearing of East (assumed basis for bearings), 1112.73 feet, along the north line of said
North Half of the Southwest Quarter,to o point on a curve,the center of circle of which lies
North 84 degrees 58 minutes 28 seconds East, 1101.71 feet from said point; thence
southeasterly 932.37 feel along said curve through a central nngle of 48 degrees 29 minutes
21 seconds;thence South 53 degrees 30 minutes 53 seconds East, 248.59 feet, to the point of
beginning of the land herein described; thence North 53 degrees 30 minutes 53 seconds West,
248.59 feet; thence northwesterly 344.01 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the
northeast,radius 1101.71 feet, through a central angle of 17 degrees 22 minutes 14 seconds;
thence South 53 degrees 51 minutes 21 seconds West, 53.00 feet, normal to last said curve;
thence North 36 degres 08 minutes 39 seconds West 130.00 feet; thence northwesterly,
westerly, and southwesterly, 328.34 feet along a tongentiol curve, concave to the south,
radius 175.00 feet, through a central angle of 107 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence
South 36 degrees 21 minutes 21 seconds West, 202.00 feet; thence southwesterly, southerly,
and southeasterly 410.20 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the east, radius 395.00
feet,through a central angle of 59 degrees, 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 23 degrees
08 minutes 39 seconds East, 234.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 51 minutes 21 seconds
West,60.19 feet,to the south line of said North Half of the Southwest Quarter;thence South
89 degrees 58 minutes 59 seconds Last, 603.40 feet,along said south line, to a line bearing
South 39 degrees 46 minutes 14 seconds West, from the point of beginning; thence North 39
degrees 46 minutes 14 seconds East, 480.82 feet, along last soid line to the point of
beginning.
Containing 625.567 square feet, 14.3610 acres,or 58,117.1 square meters.
4`)(6)
hX11I11TC A - RM 2.5 •
•
•
•
DESCRIPTION FOR ZONING
PARCEL C: ONE STORY DUPLEX AND FOURPLEX RESIDENTIAL
A tract of land lying and being in the County of Hennepin and the State of Minnesota,
described as follows,to-wit:
That part of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14,Township 116,Range
22,described as follows:
•
Beginning at the northwest corner of said North Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence on a
bearing of East (assumed basis for bearings), 1112.73 feet, along the north line of said
North Half of the Southwest Quarter, to a point on a curve, the center of circle of which
lies North 84 degrees 58 minutes 28 seconds East, 1101.71 feet from said point; thence
southeasterly 598.36 feet along said curve through a central angle of 31 degrees 07 minutes
07 seconds;thence South 53 degrees 51 minutes 21 seconds West, 53.00 feet,normal to said
curve; thence North 36 degrees 08 minutes 39 seconds West 130.00 feet; thence
northwesterly, westerly,and southwesterly, 328.34 feet along a tongentiol curve,concave
to the south, radius 175.00 feet, through a central angle of 107 degrees 30 minutes 00
seconds; thence South 36 degrees 21 minutes 21 seconds West, 202.00 feet; thence
southwesterly, southerly and southeasterly 410.20 feet along a tangential curve,concave to
the east, radius 395.00 feet, through a central angle of 59 degrees, 30 minutes 00 seconds;
thence South 23 degrees 08 minutes 39 seconds East, 234.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees
SI minutes 21 seconds West, 60.19 feet,to the south line of said North Half of the South-
west Quarter; thence North 89 degres 58 minutes 59 seconds West,872.25 feet, along sold
south line, to the west line of soid North I loll of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 01
degrees 14 minutes 23 seconds East, 1306.52 feet, along soid west line to the point of
beginning.
Containing 1,222,640 square feet,28.0679 acres,or 113,586.9 square meters.
EXIIIsrers — RM6.5
whp/ih 4/21/77
REZONING AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed in triplicate this day of
, 1977 by and between COVENANT LIVING CENTERS — MINNESOTA, INC.,
a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter called "OWNER", and the CITY OF EOEN
PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter
called "CITY"; and
WHEREAS, Owner has requested the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie
to change the zoning of a tract of land from Rural to RM 2.5 and RM 6.5 for
an area consisting of approximately forty-four (44) acres, and which is
legally described as more fully set out on Exhibit A which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, it is believed that the rezoning of said area to RM 2.5 and RM
6.5 will be in the public interest, welfare and convenience of the people of
the City of Eden Prairie; and
WHEREAS, Owners agree to develop the aforementioned property as a RM
2.5 and RM 6.5 area in consideration of the City's changing of the zoning to
Rm 2.5 and RM 6.5 and the Owner further agrees as a part of said consideration
to lay out, plat, develop and maintain the areas so rezoned generally and
in accordance with the concept plan heretofore presented to the City as
set forth by Owner's Request which booklet is dated January 31, 1977 and
which is made a part hereof marked Exhibit B.
NOW, THEREFORE, this Agreement witnesseth that for and in consideration
of the City Council of the City adopting an ordinance changing the zoning
from Rural to RM 2.5 and RM 6.5 and of the mutual benefitsto each of the
lin
•
parties hereto, the parties, their respective successors and assigns do
hereby covenant and agree as follows:
1. That the floodplain encroachment be limited to the area
set forth in Exhibit B, page 6, no. 3d.
2. That development shall be as follows:
Phase 1 - 240 apartment units •
service and common facilities
60 bed skilled care health center
Phase 2 - 96 apartment units
•
Phase 3 - 60± duplex/quadraplex units
Phase 4 - 60 nursing care beds and support services.
3. That the remaining 221 acres of floodplain shall be used only
in accordance with the standards set forth in the Purgatory •
Creek Study as adopted for reference by the City.
4. Access to site from State Highways 169/212 shall be refined to
reflect changes as shown on Exhibit C.
5. Park fees as required by City Ordinances shall be paid by the
owner.
6. All developmental and grading plans must be submitted to the
Planning Commission with the recommendation to the City Council
before further action by Owners can be taken.
7. That all sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities,
concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing whether to be
public or private, shall be designed to City Standards by a
Registered Professional Civil Engineer and submitted to the
City Engineer for approval. The developer, through his engineer,
shall provide for competent daily inspection of all street and
utility construction, both private and public. As-built
drawings with service and valve ties on reproducable mylar and
certificates of completion and compliance with specifications
shall also be delivered to the City Engineer. The developer
also agrees to pay all fees for City Engineering and adminis-
trative services consistent with current City requirements.
-2-
U014
FURTHER CITY AND PROPERTY OWNERS AGREE:
1. That the property owners shall comply with all applicable rules,
regulations, ordinances and laws of the City of Eden Prairie.
2. That the provisions of this agreement shall be binding upon and
enforceable against Owner, its successors and assigns, and upon all sub-
sequent owners, their respective heirs, successors and assigns of the
property herein described.
3. That an executed copy of this Agreement shall be recorded with the
Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
4. That if Owner fails to proceed in accordance with this agreement
within twenty-four (24) months from the date hereof, owner, for itself,
its successors and assigns agree...that it will not oppose the rezoning of
said property back to its Rural zoning.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused these
presents to be executed the day and year aforesaid.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, A municipal
corporation of the State of Minnesota
BY:
Its Mayor
Its Manager
COVENANT LIVING CENTERS — MINNESOTA, INC.
BY: 6.{.
Its
Sit7Its
-3-
47-30
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS. .
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 1977 by Wolfgang Penzel, the Mayor and by Roger Ulstad, the
City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation
on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The oregoing i ument wa ac n w aged befoi me this� day of
1977 b `� �.+Pm.r9� and by
is of Covenant Living Centers -
Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corpora on, on behalf of the corporation.
ia
Notary Public
Pw+v+wAr�
JOAta O.LA PORTE
%SM^ NOTARY PUBLIC•MS*3ft01 A
yi yt 7£q 14tittlE14 C JTI
S•`�1" wp Canrtr.:ia�on Espnnv aW..�8.t9B9
-4-
1091
•
•
A tract of land lying and being in the County of Hennepin and the State of
Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit:
That part of the North half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township
116, Range 22, described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of said North Half of the Southwest Quarter;
thence on a bearing of East (assumed basis for bearings), 1112.73 feet,
along the north line of said North Half of the Southwest Quarter, to a
point on a curve, the center of circle of which lies North 84 degrees 58
minutes 28 seconds East, 1101.71 feet from said point; thence southeasterly
932.37 feet along said curve through a central angle of 48 degrees 29
minutes 21 seconds; thence South 53 degrees 30 minutes 53 seconds East,
473.94 feet, to the northwesterly line of land described in a deed from
The Preserve to the City of Eden Prairie, dated December 7, 1976; thence
South 36 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds West, 87.56 feet along said north-
westerly line; thence southwesterly 215.12 feet along said northwesterly
line, a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, radius 1874.86 feet,
through a central angle of 06 degrees 34 minutes 27 seconds, to the south
line of said North Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 89 degrees
58 minutes 59 seconds West, 1774.82 feet, along said south line, to the west
line of said North Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 01 degrees
14 minutes 23 seconds East, 1306.52 feet, along said west line to the point
of beginning.
Containing 1938534 square feet, 44.5026 acres, or 180095.7 square meters.
•
irma
EXHIBIT A
•
•
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Development Stage Plan
A Rezoning Request
for
Tudor Oaks - Eden Prairie
by
Covenant Living Centers - Minnesota, Inc.
31 January 1977
•
a
Covenant Living Centers - Minnesota, Inc.
Elliott C. George, Project Coordinator
8920 Franlo Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Phone: 941-3900 office
941-5535 home
Exhibit B
CDVENANT LIVING CENTERS - Minnesota, Inc.
PUD Development Stage Plan
1 Project Identification:
a. Ownership... The site is at the Southwest quadrant of the inter-
section of Schooner Boulevard and Flying Cloud Drive (US 169-712).
This property is owned by The Preserve, which holds the deed to
the land. The applicant - Covenant Living Centers - Minnesota,
Inc., has signed an offer to purchase this land from The Preserve.
The applicant is a non-profit Minnesota corporation. The offer is
contingent upon the issuance of a Certificate of Need for nursing
beds by the Minnesota State Board of Health.
b. Developer... The developer of this site will be Covenant Living
Centers - Minnesota, Inc. CLC-MI is a part of the Covenant Living
Centers group. This group constructs and operates retirement
communities. This community will be known as Tudor Daks-Eden
Prairie (TD-EP). It will be managed by Covenant Living Services,
Inc., which is a Wisconsin non-profit corporation whose sole pur-
pose is to provide management services to retirement communities.
TO-EP's staff and facilities will provide residents with apart-
ments for independent living and a broad continuum of health care
and social services. It is TD-EP's purpose to provide retired
people with the services, programs and environment which will
enable them to live with dignity and security.
/R TO-EP will be the third facility within the CLC group. Tudor Daks
South, the first facility in the group, is in its second year of
operation. CLC has contractual agreements for consulting services
with PHP Management Consultants, Inc., a wholly owned sudsidiary
of Presbyterian Housing Programs, Inc. PHP, Inc., is a not-for-
profit Indiana corporation, which is affiliated with the Synod of
Lincoln Trails of the United Presbyterian Church.
c. Fiscal, Economic... Past experience has shown that CLC-MI can
finance this project privately,' rather than use Federal or State
funding programs. It is currently negotiating with Francoeur &
Co., of Deerfield, Illinois and with Dain, Kalman & Quail of
Minneapolis, Minnesota for financing through the placement of
notes or bonds.
Financing of previous projects has included interim funding with a
local savings and loan; permanent financing was done with the
public placement of first mortgage notes and loans from two major
insurance companies.
d. Development Method... The site and structures will be owned by
CLC-MI. Residents of TD-EP pay a one time Accommodation fee, which
constitutes a life-lease of the apartment chosen. This fee varies
according to apartment size. When an apartment becomes vacant,
either through a resident's voluntary departure or death, it re-
verts
to CLC-MI, is refurbished, and re-leased.
• �;
•
{
CLC-MI Development Stage Plan Page 2
e. Development Timing... Planning has been underway for over a year.
It has included the services of Daverman Associates, Inc., of
Grand Rapids, Michigan and consultation with Mr. Dick Putnam,
City Planner of Eden Prairie. Concurrently, CLC-MI has been pre-
paring an application for a Certificate of Need. This is required
for the inclusion of beds for nursing services. The Certificate
of Need application is to be submitted February 8, 1977, to the
Health Planning Board of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin
Cities area. These bodies will review the application and make
recommendations to the Minnesota State Board of Health.
When the State Board of Health issues a Certificate of Need,
CLC-MI will open a sales office and model apartment. These will•
probably be located in Eden Prairie Center. Upon receiving de-
posits or Accommodation Fees for 25% of the initial 240 apartments, ?
CLC-MI will begin construction. CLC-MI estimates that .construction
can begin near the end of August, 1977. The apartments of Phase I
should be ready for occupancy near October of 1978. The health
care center would be ready for licensing and certification during
January, 1979.
Construction is to occur in phases. As presently planned the
phases will be as follows:
I 240 fully equipped and independent apartments, 60 skilled
r nursing beds; •
II 100 fully equipped and independent apartments;
III 60 single family/quadraplex housing units for the elderly;
IV 40 board and care beds (convertible to skilled if needed).
f. Critical Public Decisions... There are two critical decisions to be
made by public bodies. First,.as mentioned above, the Minnesota
State Board of Health must grant CLC-MI a Certificate of Need after
receiving recommendations based upon review by the Health Planning
Board of the Metropolitan Council. Second, upon recommendation of
the Eden Prairie Planning Commission, the Eden Prairie Common
Council will be asked to grant this re-zoning application.
CLC-MI understands that platting and environmental studies for
this site have already been done by the present owners and reviewed
by the Planning Commission.
2 Plan Area Identification:
a. Identify Boundaries and Conditions... The Southwest quadrant of
the intersection of Schooner B—ouE yard and Flying Cloud Drive
(US 169-212).
b. Identify Project Area and other Major Ownerships... The area of the
•
CLC-MI Development Stage Plan Page 3
project is currently owned by The Preserve. Other owners of
surrounding property are:
Plat Parcel
56714 4875 Alan O'Neill
4812 Roycar Road
Minneapolis, MN 55435
56714 4831 Alan O'Neill
4812 Roycar Road {
Minneapolis, MN 55435
56714 4817 Myrtle Mitchell '.
8440 Flying Cloud Drive
• Eden Prairie, MN 55343
56714 5610 The Preserve
8920 Franlo Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
56714 7149 Bermel-Smaby Realty Co. •
5309 Minneapolis, MN Southdale 55419
56715 2000 Lloyd G. Cherne
5704 View Lane
Edina, MN 55436
56963 3000 Gerald Steelman
8410 Flying Cloud Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
c. Regional Relationships... The physical relationship of the site to
the Eden Prairie Center and the Eden Prairie Family Clinic was im-
portant in the selection of the site. Together, with present and
projected public transportation routes, they make major health,
social and commercial enterprises extraordinarily accessible for
retired and elderly people. This accessibility can become more
and more desireable, as people become less and less mobile.
Because of the programs services and style of living offered, resi-
dents of TO-EP may reasonably be expected to come from the entire
Twin Cities area.
At the Metropolitan level, there is concern about containing the
costs of health core. Therefore, CLC-MI's request of a Certificate
of Need for nursing beds will be reviewed as to its economic impact
on nursing homes and board and care homes in the area. CLC-MI is
also concerned about containing the costs while delivering the best
care possible, and is convinced that any economic impact on similar
facilities will be minimal and short-lived.
q1°►(o
CLC-MI Development Stage Plan Page 4
TO-EP residents will be encouraged to exercise their privileges
and rights as members of the community at large, through partici-
pation in the existing programs and activities of The Preserve,
City, County, and metropolitan areas. Besides the residents, the
facilities and staff of TO-EP can be expected to participate in
community life as well. TO-EP will be well situated to serve
Eden Prairie's retired and elderly people, who choose to continue
living in their own homes. It can serve as the physical setting
for day-care, recreational, educational, and health-care programs.
It can also serve as the initiating catalyst and as the home base
for programs such as meals-on-wheels, which carry service to
shut-ins.
d. Existing Land Use and Occupancy... The higher parts of the site
are unused for any purpose. The floodplain portion, approximately
29 acres, is farmed. There are no buildings on the site.
e. Existing Transportation Systems... The site is already accessible
from Schooner Boulevard. Further, it is close enough to Flying
Cloud Drive that suppliers' trucks will be able to avoid other
residential areas when making deliveries. Plans include service
roads and parking facilities on site for TO-EP use.
r Because the site is in the Major Center Area, pedestrian paths are
required for its development. TO-EP will coordinate its own paths
with those which approach or cross the property.
TO-EP will have its own shuttle bus for residents' use. Its
regular routes will provide transportation to various shopping and
service areas. It will also be scheduled to connect with established
routes of the Metropolitan Transit Commission. MTC routes already {
under consideration are those which include Eden Prairie Center and !!
Glen Lake Sanatorium stops. i
i
f. Existing Zoning... The site isccurrently zoned for agriculture. }
The Preserve has already done,extensive research and other work in a
preparation for a similar re-zoning request, i.e. from agricultural
to a mix of service/commercial and high density residential.
g. Guide Plan and PUD Concept Stage Plan Framework... As far back as
1968 the city of Eden Prairie showed a concern for the quality of
living it could offer its present and future citizens. In the
adoption of the "Community Development Program", (COP) prepared for
Eden Prairie by Brauer & Associates, Inc., the city was already
asking such questions as, ,
How should people live together? I
How should the aged and handicapped be cared for? (p 20 CDP)
, The city was also looking ahead to specific land uses. "High
density multiple development is limited to the area surrounding the
•
• , .
•
CLC-MI Development Stage Plan Page 5
major, regional, commercial center.,. Large scale institutional
development should also be encouraged in this area. A community
college, vocational school, hospital, medical center, retirement
community, or other high density quasi-residential development
would be acceptable and desirable in this area.' (p 94 COP)
Since 1968 Eden Prairie has gone on to see and act on specific
needs of people. The Housing Task Force Report (HTFR) of 1972
spoke of the need for a diverse mix of people, if a community is
to be viable in the "real world." (pp 8-12 HTFR) Elderly people
were specifically mentioned as a part of this needed diversity.
(pp 10-11 HTFR) Yet Eden Prairie's population of people 65 years
of age and over is only 246, according to a Special Census done
here in October of 1975, by the Bureau of the Census. This repre •
-
sents a gross increase from 179 people 65 and over, as cited in
the "Development Program." (p 26 COP) However, as a percentage
of the population, people 65 and over have slipped from 3% in
1967 (p 26 CDP) to 27%. Perhaps part of the reason is the type
of housing that has been built. In great contrast to the overall
Metropolitan area, there has been no housing specifically designed
and offered to retired and elderly people in Eden Prairie. This
proposal is also consistent with the Major Center Area Plan which
was adopted in 1973 as an amendment to the 1968 Comprehensive Guide
C Plan, or CD?.
The concerns for people which are consistently shown throughout the
"Community Development Plan" and the Housing Task Force Report have
been a part of the CLC-MI philosophy from its beginning. The TO-EP
project seems to offer another opportunity for the City of Eden
Prairie and CLC-MI to put that philosophy to work and to increase
the diversity of people and housing opportunities in Eden Prairie.
h. General Analysis and Conclusions... In light of the above, Tudor
Oaks-Eden Prairie seems to be one of the best possible uses for this
site.
3 Plan-Project Area Analysis
a. Topography and Slopes... The Site Plan (Appendix A, p 1) shows the
approximate relationship of TO-EP's structure to the site. To
accommodate the site and the structure to each other, some excavation
and filling will be required. The natural elevations and character-
istics of the topography will be incorporated into the site plan
wherever it is possible to do so.
Topographic and elevations of the site are on sheets 2, 3, and 4 of
Appendix B.
b. Soils... See pp 20-24 of the "Eden Prairie Major Center Area Public
1lJlP for a discussion of soil types in zones 5 and 6. '
•
CLC-MI Development Stage Plan Page 6
c. Vegetation... On the floodplain level., 818' elevation, vegetation is
primarily cultivated and wild grasses. Most of this will be undis-
turbed until and unless the floodplain is developed for recreational,
garden, or other open space use.
At approximately 830' elevation, on the floodplain side of the site,
is a row of trees. CLC-MI plans to use these trees as an integral
part of its site development. Most of the other vegetation on the
site is "scrub cover". Much of it will be removed during excavation
and construction. As areas are freed from construction traffic and
use, they will be landscaped with appropriate grasses, other ground
cover plants, shrubs, and young trees.
Also see p 22, MCA Plan.
d. Water... As it presently exists, the site includes 28.5 acres of
f o plain. CLC-MI proposes to fill approximately 5.7 acres of this
for additional building area. The area to be filled, and the re-
sulting configuration of the floodplain, is shown on sheets 3 and 7
of Appendix B.
e. Photographic Analysis...
r- f. General Natural Ecological Analysis and Conclusions... See pp 80-85
MCA Plan for a discussion of land uses in zones S and 6.
I,
4 Plan Proposal
a. Development Objectives... As stated above, CLC-MI wants to provide
a facility, environment and staff, which will enable.people to live
with dignity and security. The main facility will be unique in the
Twin Cities area. It will include a skilled nursing area within
the same building as the apartments. The basic reason for doing
this is that it provides continuity. People, who need this sort of
health care, are able to remain,in much closer contact with their
friends and spouses. They are able to avoid the additional trauma
of moving to a new and strange'setting. This arrangement also pro-
vides a continuity of health care, which is much more difficult to j
achieve, when apartments and health care facilities are separated.
This arrangement makes residents and medical staff much more
accessible to each other.
The health care wing must be built to Federal Life Safety Code
specifications. These include sprinkling systems, automatic fire
doors, heat and smoke detectors, and use of fire resistant materials.
Apartments will be built according to all existing codes and regu-
lations in effect. Beyond these requirements, apartments will also
have nurse call switches at several key points. These alert the
nursing station of a need and put the nurse and resident in voice
contact with each other. Apartment design will also include special
CLC-MI Development Stage Plan Page 7
furnishings such as higher stools and walk-in showers. Apartment
kitchens will be fully equipped,so that residents can prepare meals
other than those they take in the common dining area.
Because many elderly people are increasingly vulnerable, the
security system has remote and automatic features, beyond the nurse
calls.
All outside doors will be connected with a remote control panel.
After a certain time each evening, security personnel can tell at a
glance if a door is ajar. A similar panel will be connected to
heat and smoke detectors throughout the facility.
A commons area will provide office space for administrative staff,
main kitchen and common dining area, service shops--such as beauty
and barber shops, commissary--library, game room, craft rooms, em-
ployee locker areas, chapel, lobby, storage areas for residents be-
longings, and mechanical systems.
Although the site is very accessible to Eden Prairie Center and
Eden Prairie Family Clinic, and although TO-EP will operate its own
shuttle bus, some residents will want to retain their own cars:
whether for pleasure trips or for going to work. Parking facilities,
including garages, will be provided.
/` The Floodplain portion of the site has many possibilities, e.g.
gardening, picnicing, golf, tennis, cross country skiing, ice
skating. The best possibilities are probably those that open the
area to the rest of the community. In this way, the area could pro-
vide opportunities for residents of TO-EP and the larger Eden Prairie
community to mix and meet each other.
b. Site Plan... See Appendix A page 1.
c. Grading... Grading will genera:ly follow that shown in Appendix B
sheets 6 and 11.
d. Utility Plan... See Appendix B sheet 12.
e. Preliminary Architectural Drawings... See Appendix A pages 2-6.
f. Legal Instruments... CLC-MI is aware of NSP's power easement, as
mentioned in the MCA Plan and shown in Appendix B. Other easements,
such as rights of way and floodplain will be granted as needed if
they are not already a part of the title. The title is held by The
Preserve. An offer to purchase has been negotiated between The
Preserve and CLC-MI. Pathway easements will be determined and
granted during the design process, according to established pro-
cedures and in keeping with the MCA Plan, the characteristics of the
land and anticipated use of its various parts.
•
CLC-MI Development Stage Plan Page 8
•
g. Housing or Land Building Use Profile... Design and area specifi-
cations for phases III and IV will •e done at a later date and will
be submitted at that time.
Phase I will include the commons area, 60 nursing beds at approx-
Tmately 300 sq. ft. each including support areas, and 240 apartments
as follows:
16 Studios @ 258 sq. ft. = 4,128 sq. ft.
16 Alcoves @ 432 " " = 6,912 " " •
160 1 BR @ 529 " " = 84,640 " "
48 2 BR @ 687 " " = 32,976 " "
Total apartment area 128,656 Sq. ft.
Commons and health care
and access 136,344 " "
265,000 Sq. ft.
Estimated cost $8,500,000.00
Phase II
75 1 BR @ 529 sq. ft. = 39,675 sq. ft.
25 2 BR @ 687 " " = 17,175 " "
access and other 3,150 " "
60 000
Estimated cost $1,900,000.00
TO-EP will be designed to accommodate 450 people when fully occupied.
See Appendix A pages 2-6 for floor plans, etc.
h. Zoning Classifications and/or Variations from City Ordinances... The
zoning requested is R.M. 2.5, R.M. 6.5 and Service/Commercial.
The service commercial zoning is requested for approximately 2 acres
of the site. This area is indicated by shading in Appendix A page 1.
This zoning is also requested, if required for the service shops and
nursing areas of the facility. If variances or other appropriate
zoning is required, CLC-MI will amend its application upon consult-
ation with the Eden Prairie Planning Commission.
i. Phasing and Construction Schedule... The schedules for Phases III and
IV are undetermined at this time.
The schedule for Phase I is as follows:
1 February '77 Submit rezoning application to Eden Prairie
Planning Commission.
•
416l
•
•
•
CLC-MI Development Stage Plan Page 9
(-� 8 February '77 Submit Certificate of Need application to
Health Planning Board of Metropolitan Council.
14 February '77 Eden Prairie Planning Commission holds public. .
meeting and hears Covenant Living Centers -
Minnesota's presentation.
15 February '77 Eden Prairie Common Council orders public
hearing on CLC-MI proposal.
23 February '77 Review of CoN application by Project Review
Committee of the Metropolitan Health Board.
28 February '77 Eden Prairie Planning Commission sends recommen-
dation concerning CLC-MI to Common Council.
1 March '77 Eden Prairie Common Council has first hearing of
CLC-MI request.
9 March '77 Second Project Review Committee meeting on CLC-
MI. Committee makes its recommendation.
15 March '77 Eden Prairie Common Council signs rezoning agree-
,.- ment and holds second hearing.
23 March '77 Metropolitan Health Board holds public hearing on
project and acts on Review Committee recommend-
ation.
undated Human Resources receives Metro Health Board
recommendation, and acts on it.
7 or 21 April '77 Metropolitan Council receives recommendations of
Metro Health Board and Human Resources, holds
public hearing and takes action.
28 April '77 State Board of Health--Certificate of Need Com-
mitee--receives Metro Council recommendation and
acts on it.
12 May '77 State Board of Health acts on its CoN Committee's
recommendation.
13 May '77 State Certificate of Need issued.
14 May '77 Close negotiations for sales office and model
apartment; begin sales work.
23 May '77 State Health Planning and Development Agency acts
on Federal certification of TO-EP
•
q'U2
•
•
CLC-MI Development Stage Plan Page 10
Labor Day '77 25% of first phase apartments are sold.
Construction begins on TO-EP.
October '78 Apartments are ready for occupancy.
January '79 Health Care wing ready for licensing and certi-
fication.
•
•
T •
420�
J N� L J
\.,,, ..\, , ,,, .
. .
_.----):,-/ (-- -,--s-A R .
, .. 0,\Pe a GC') 1 U.1
\\\ /4,. ir/ ,,,,,,r1 _ ,,,. .,.,.., .
\\01-il Vc6D'()\:' li '61,44° !C:ii;/‘ CC
s. \1-.1":4, A\c',.y(<> . ; ,.._ -,-.;51--1,-',..„-4,,
�\ \Do �O •JFp g .
o -
is 0
it a ' 'i
. r nil
t...! E oi ]
•
•w p
gil• Es 3 „8 A v,en1,X A
11115
Q meg ZaRej1a •
Zg a E$ e:.
o a
•
•
. .
. . .
(---
P." . • f---.7:‘<;\‘ '
•
vr. \e-'. • •
04 C 1c.
' 4,., (, I lh
41
1 . .1, -,..1:.. , 7......„._
5.i... , ‹.. -. . .. •-.. IN
. -t' .7•: -..7 4‘ 6‘i C:' >) ,
r-
/-"'
4 .
_e_.. .. I
1 4
1
i'
I/ j I
- el
1,1
z•c=.
gol
.....---,.,
, \ ,,
,
-••,.
..,. 111 -
III
,
, ;...
p , , • Arep.,:i?k A
•, -,., „• z
. , .
, • •
• oos
- • .i
•
. i
. . .
. .
. i
• ,
. • 1
. i
. .
. ;
. • i
0>:"
i
Lki .
. .
I :.
ILLS t4 • -
Lt.. .
_.
AU .
0 .
. .
..
F-
,
it_:,_,,,,T.-.7! j -1.‘1 •2%
i,1• i:
..-..'' '
/- . !
( • i
. 4PA.CI I X A
3
. i
. ii
•
•
L
® • t
M
; O
g :
/—. "1-L-1.i ' I I::_ •=li----'5,
I( ) . I 1
.
d
L i
1
\\ d
1111E _I-'- - zg I
I -' ° °
-4- �-,
pax a
4
i
z .
® 4 _
1
' 1 ,
•
- 0 6 ''. .1111! .
- ./11 Ltl., a -=' 1
r- 1
11
-4I
"i 1
o
•
.[ qg
N I
f•
j41..." - . , —- 7' 77'- - if i
toot (O L.. 5 •
r---
1. .
•
,11
. ,
1
1,
' . li III
m - ,,17,„
4 1 ,
M 1 .1,0
i .--111- i DI
h i 1
i
VE ' ri .,
Ci* ill
ILO q I I i 1
Ki..0
:,.,. i
,
,
. .
1
1 1 i
,
-i .
41111111N---- -2 - ., ,' . _
um- I
9 I
_,
0 0
0 0 1 II -
1, id-,
(........___....:_...............„ il
4 ,
Irr--WO
Appe..1,1A
.1 : . • 1 ,A--- . --,1
( 1L,1 L.11111 jiii f
_L.
•
•
• Staff Report - Tudor Oaks -2- Feb. 25/77
�+. ACCESS/CIRCULATION .
t The revised site plan 2-7-77 illustrates an access from U.S. 169 less
than 150 feet from the Schooner Blvd and 169 intersection. The Preserve
and the City engineer agreed to the following access restricts for Area H 1
. as outlined in the 12-9-76 letter from Lee Johnson, Vice President Preserve.
•
"3. If a development plan is submitted for Area H showing all commercial use 1
or a combination use of Covenant Living Center and commericial on the
Schooner Blvd. - 169 intersection, then a ROW corridor dedication up to i
• 60' wide shall be located by Preserve design to provide for a loop
connection between Schooner Blvd., and a full access intersection to Highway
169 approximately 600' or less south of the Area F intersection to 169." f
d
• Figure 1 illustrates the changes in the Covenant Living Center-Minnestoa Inc.
. revised site plan necessary to comply with the US/169 access requirements.
• FIGURE 1 .
nciuM-. 1-• /1.
: / .r .r-i‘. _1 t..._" ) '$( ‘ " • .
-.4.1..,_ . -, E---1)\r-Eli 1 \z--.,!. .
'30. 0\\\ cvl r-jr--1 11-11—j j'4\\'. ". -- * .
Q'� ' `� �'� . C ]v:tAc7` ) , pCL
Cry rS�t s�� VO � � �4 \t
\• C ; ., i ,
11
�.f[-Jill � " -----1.-, l% '.s, (�?0,i, 4 G^ 'mac?Cl
C 0.'. /�_-i.• \- N yN''� N.
/-.,-..-, `-ramL '' `J.♦-'0 ..A.',-) 1 / `ham2i .\ q '`U� j `t. \y j C ii-\ 0 , ii••,5;�S. x i •. r ! `, • a /y am / / /
. -¢^ � .-• ,.' , .` Fa j vpseg: /,.f., / "
< ) w , �s1
4)097
.1''' ��.ebor-AL313 pZIODaopt . r2.nada_. b 41V iR. .•,\
r.
IGri «�aE�.' �,tY
Sthibit C --
3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager .
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services/. J,
SUBJECT: Municipal Liquor Store
DATE: June 10, 1977
As directed we have attempted to "hard-line" our projections and estimates
for the municipal liquor store.
THE STORE
•
We've reduced the square footage to an absolute minimum of 2,325 sq. ft.
This enables us to "fill the shelves" without investing great amounts of
money in inventory. It also reduces the costs substantially. Finally,
if the store is very successful--the smaller space forces us out into
a free standing building earlier because of physical space limitations.
The space is adequate.
INVENTORY `
Based on the reduced space we've had actual orders prepared for GRAND
OPENING. The cost of inventory would be $20,000 for liquor and wine
and $5,000 for beer and pop. We'd suggest a $30,000 inventory fund.
The Inventory is based on:
. Good liquor variety--but not "every brand in every size".
. Good wine seclection.
. Beer selection in limited sizes.
EQUIPMENT AND FIXTURES
Also based on the reduced space the following equipment is needed:
102 linear feet of "4 shelf" wall shelving $3,570
2 8' wine racks 800
1 double checkout counter 1,200
1 15'x38' "walk-in" cooler 16,500
2 cash registers 6,000
1 desk 175
1 "2-wheel"cart 50
Total $28,295
The obvious major cost is the cooler. They come in modular sections
and can be expanded, moved, etc. This size we feel is large enough
so that the beer will be handled once--from the delivery truck to the
cooler.
Municipal Liquor -2- June 10/77
THE LEASE
•
Because of the reduced square footage the lease terms have changed
slightly. Previously we'd talked about a sliding scale for 3 years:
1st year $4.00
2nd year $4.25 •
3rd year $4.50
We're now going to have to pay $4.50/year for 3 years to cover additional
costs associated with dividing the larger space into two smaller ones.
Other lease costs include:
Common Areas Maintenance 404/sq. ft.
Taxes 504/sq. ft.
Insurance 84/sq. ft.
Merchants Ass'n Dues $15/month
•
These are included in operating budget estimates.
For this we'll receive the space including:
. Ceiling with sprinkler system
. Electrical System including ceiling lighting
. Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning
We'll have to do the following:
. Store Front $2,000
. Carpet (150 yds. x 10.yd) $1,500
. Paint 500
. Install Lavatory 1,500
. Build back wall 10'x12' 700
. Connect special electrical for
cooler and service counter 500
$6,700
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE COSTS
Total financing for the City going into business would include:
Equipment $28,295
Inventory $30,000
Lease Improvements $ 6,700
$64,995
44i/
Municipal Liquor -3- June 10/77
STAFF
We would propose a. very conservative approach to staffing with:
An Operations Director $12-14,000/year
Assistant $10,000/year
Part-time salespeople $3-4/hour
The number of people on duty at a time would be:
M-F 9 a.m. - 3 p.m. 1 person
M-F 3 p.m. - 8 p.m. 2 people
Sat. 9 a.m. - 1- p.m. 2 people
OPERATING BUDGET
A total operating budget of S51,000 is estimated: •
Operations Director $14,000
Assistant $10,000
Sales People $ 8,000
Employee Benefits $ 6,000
Insurance & Bonds & Taxes $ 7,000
Utilities $ 3,000
Advertizina $ 1,000
Supplies & Maintenance $ 2,000
$51,000
HOURS
The following schedule is proposed: •
DATE LIQUOR GROCERY MALL
Monday 9 a.m. - 8 p.m. 8 a.m. - 9 p.m. 9 a.m. - 9 p.m.
Tuesday 9 a.m. - 8 p.m. 8 a.m. - 9 p.m. 9 a.m. - 9 p.m.
Wednesday ' 9 a.m. '- 8 p.m. 8 p.m..- 9 p.m. 9 a.m. - 9 p.m.
Thursday 9 a.m. - 8 p.m. 8 p.m. - 9 p.m. 9 a.m. - 9 p.m.
Friday 9 a.m. - 8 p.m. 8 a.m. - 9 p.m. 9 a.m. - 9 p.m.
Saturday 9 a.m. - 10 p.m. 8 a.m. - 6 p.m. 9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Sunday CLOSED 10 a.m. - 6 p.m. noon - 5 p.m. '
•
Municipal Liquor -4- June 1 /77
MARKETING
•
We'd suggest( he principal o fair pricing" not the "give away" operations at
some liquor 'tofu. underlying principal is to try to capture a sub-
stantial shape of the local market based on convenience first and some satellite
patronage. We feel that beer and wine (the high mark-up items) will be big
enough sellers to permit an overall gross profit of 21-22 %. We are not
suggesting other sales such as cigarettes, potatoe chips, etc. Penny's is
generally open when the liquor store will be open and we wouldn't beat their
prices anyway. •
The City should "promote" the Municipal Liquor Store by:
. Stressing fair prices.
. Identifying "high visibility" physical projects to be undertaken
with the profits (Examples: Park and Recreation Improvements,
Public Safety Equipment, etc.). -
ANNUAL STATEMENT for 1st 12 months of operation
Total Sales $400,000
Cost of Sales (79%) $316,000
Gross Profit (21%) $ 84,000 -
Operating Expense $ 51,000
$ 33,000
Lease Payments $ 10,463
Net Profit 22,537
Debt Service $ 16,400
Net Cash Flow $ 6,132
All Debt Service costs will be paid in full after the 1st 5 years of operation.
•
`+/O)�
•
MEMORANDUM
T0: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services
SUBJECT: Recommendation from the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission concerning season boat launch fees
DATE: June 10, 1977 •
On Monday, June 6, 1977 the Commission considered the feasibility of
initiating season boat launch fees for Bryant Lake Park and Lake Riley
Park. They recommend that the following fees be established:
Residents Non-residents
20 horsepower or greater $30.00 $50.00
1-19 horsepower $15.00 $25.00
The season launch passes would be valid at both parks until they close •
on taboo Day. -
June 14, 1P;
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-78
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND
FINAL PLAT OF EDENVALE RECREATION CENTER 2ND ADD.
WHEREAS, the plat of Edenvale Recreation Center 2nd Addition has
been submitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden
Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and
all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City
plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minne-
sota and Ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
•
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Edenvale Recreation Center 2nd
Addition is herein approved.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified
copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of
Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required
by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: June 9, 1977
SUBJECT: Edenvale Recreation Center 2nd Addition
Mr. Don Peterson from Edenvale, Inc., has submitted a Preliminary Plat
dated May 16, 1977, for a portion of the Edenvale Family Recreation
Center development at the northeast corner of T.H. 5 and Mitchell Road.
The attached drawing shows the original development plan approved for
this area. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this plat
at their June 13th meeting.
It is recommended that approval of the Edenvale Recreation Center 2nd
Addition should be conditioned on the following:
1. Outlot B shall be increased to 32' wide adjacent to
Lots 1, 2 and 3 and the radii of the first two curves
east of Mitchell Road increased to 50'.
2. The roadway within Outlot B shall be widened from the •
present 21' to 28' and a bituminous wearing course
applied and also concrete curb and gutter.
3. A condominium association shall be formed which will
own the access of Outlot B. This association shall be
comprised of all the owners who use this roadway and
it will be responsible for maintenance of such road-
way and utility lines therein. The lot owners will
automatically become members of this association.
Such association shall also guaranty road and utility
access to the property abutting the east side of Lot 4
and Outlot A.
4. A parking area to accomodate truck parking shall be
constructed or, Lots 1 and 2. Such parking shall be
available for all tenants in the development.
5. Edenvale shall construct the necessary channelization
at the intersection of Highway 5 and Outlot B and shall
properly sign the entrance as required by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation permit.
- 2 -
6. Outlot A shall be dedicated to the City free and clear
upon development of Lot 3.
7. Compliance with the requirements of the June 21, 1976,
rezoning agreement, including construction of a 5' wide .
5" thick concrete sidewalk in the right-of-way of
Mitchell Road from T.H. 5 to the north limits of the
plat.
8. Submission of a $10,000 performance bond or letter of '
credit to assure completion of the roadway, parking •
area and sidewalks required herein, not later than
October 30, 1977.
If the Council chooses to approve this proposal without any major changes,
then the May 16 Preliminary Plat could also be approved as the Final Plat.
C11:kh
Attachment
•
Y��lo
1
4
,
/
'..',
. i
, ... —...-....._. ... 5
• •i,.. ,• i.7,
/
‘• ' .• •..i(*. . ;
- / / / -7--11_-__77_75'.‘-,-_--:,-:-—- - •;';::.:'-'
•• I ---
1
" 0 -
_ %, • -•,,""''' / / I , i LI"
_ 4
l /
/ / .. .1••_*--:';':
§r ; ',,.!..,-.1 - ---.:-- ' , • '' ' '---j. '
: 'N. I .'.''';.4-',..--"-'1'._ -— • ;- • ` ,
-•-, j,..,_,,, ,.t / ii:'.....' 1---j, F i 1----:'" _1 ' .. • '..: '11' L•. I
$
la U a ,......-.....M i 't :L. :.. 1 i_____! 1 . __ i • .. '
,. . ., / ,ii.:•\,7,,i: ,.,- 7-:.1-"•,'-',: . ,•-• : . , •,_'-`
T „,<-:_------7----------_____..,_ /
:, -• ':: : ••!, ' ., , ',-;../ t 1) i :.4.- 4 •
i,• -,';'--------: 7N------ -\ .\;• .. _ c........_,,_p,it, , :. ,,,,., ,..,.', ..;.....-,-..,....-:--1.1
--I
,
, .
--.1 1 , -4-124 '4 Tl-Trt).:-', :...•'- :,*'71- -; • ;I....,. „. 6,,. _71
/ r/ :•"'::i.T A .'"-L'4 - •\ • •' (:t•-•—:11
•- i '' • ! i ': ;.c--- .
.• 8 ;:,i'-'7"4"--_H-ifl:.)-!:7,"1 1
..-. 4.7) 1 ,/ ':...,'7.4 ••,,,..,'
-;-•:.--L-=--:-----71:------..-:: -::f...,','‘ •5-7--t'lr..:..i:- .§, i':--,t1 771-,,,49-i-.1,47:_l• ___1•4;.,..;-tri.- :,....',1,' .'.:'...!.,,.,,::i.;.,-'--41,t..,- ?.;
0.,.:‘ a . ,.!:-.,.',Y.0.,-;-'1-,,,l-='4',.-b 1:1_,j 77.----7177 ';''----0-..'1.1iii 1-:-•)..-';'1•-.':
.,1
_I , ,...„, ,,,,,i,,,,c,L0-. v4T-I •,.!..i._,-.,-,-_,---_-‘_, .--' 1---;—,'. ; ;:', --. ,
-•••,/ ,,f r ((- ..k,,_',,:.-:,',, ,4„,,,s,I,II:g, p peL 1 :::"; 7..--,..-'_-- Li:11_ ..14__I'-____ . i, ..?, ',.,,/ i
'.f.S.N '' / I 1 't--':".;‘,.--5.:-!L'.L!'1•13_ B-,r:,--''''':":-..;!,;j1--li,-,!.3- : . .. ,,•.'t„.•,:?
---... k' ' ., , : i/ ,,:...?, ,,r,!;,,g_ gc,-,,L4 /- - • : r * • I's ft P ' - ' • •
-; L.-'C',I ., ,- -4".:.--..!•--- ---__0,-.‘„ ...,,,..,or,
• '
N• • / / 'I/ /./2:::/_ ' ;------- __ 1,_•_...,,,, i .„, r 13 11 , \i .
, ,'-••• • r.-7-----,;-;--,1.,.,, . i ..._ ,•,1. i
---4 i ---...._ 4 / ,,,,,..1..r., :.,...,...,,,.4,, „, - ,..,..-77---,-.,t.•;„f
4 ' i!".*-,•-•<,'1••••-•'-;;;_-,,--"--)2,,,."-_-!•:-,4_7:-:,PiP.P_•• ,•••':': *...-0:',„; -i,f,,,.6 .. , „..,,, ,,i
bi,p,,.,7r....,:, :,7,,z, .f..,___....__..i....,-:,....:7.4:1,::::,_,-:7;,:::__:.-"ifz--1, 144.•'..,..C.%-_,•._ ,..;:.:,- 2
ti,,,:„..,-.,,,, ij:..,,,,.7,1,:i--.7;-:,,ik."77,':: -',".-;'-,'..7--'1 4:e..i.5-1'.:: ,A.5,41i '' : A) •-'
..,_,......„.... ,, ,r,,, ,k,,j,,,,,4.•,-.el r':;4;0 p!Ei,:,, :-.,.,4,)-A,.. B rs,'1;',:!c : .: ' " •' . •
—•__'` t'•••,;••-•' I i i,!•!,....•;;•.1.•.....; ••, -i 7 ,§- -;---',s1,"- , -v-g:-.-,-,:-r-4_,,.. 1 , ,lin , , . -
., f.1,.7.i•:Nli!:7.„:,fll3_1713.:!,,,,;,,,;-'ft,
-7 ,)1 , I'V.7 ••••••' .--7 -•!C, CI7'.:1:"..:_--i.-7,7c—'),-----;.----;,-:''''- -.--'•::::_.:Ti.4 rg -7 '1
!---__-'
;---,___ — '-t--",r,,.1-_- --f-Li-f!s--•-•'.-- '''71:-•!„;••);-'-i P'.-•r-•-!,';',•;.•-;r;.-!-... I a-i''', 7:-2.!.(:7-.: (7--
...,--,-:
- - "---__T-.2-_-:-_______-' ...,..:. :-,::.:,•...: ....:4 , ,......:-,--7 ,,-_---0
-1, :--- ---, r7-....;;;;;-,-.:-;• --, ,---__.. --„:„..._z_-- . -'.,- .:- ,i,:i:,..---. \ --1, -
i
I family recreation center
...
iP1(i 1
June 14, 1i 7
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-80
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR IMPROVEMENTS
ON HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD, I.C. 51-309
WHEREAS, a 100% petition has been received, and
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve:
I.C. 51-209, Street and utility
improvements on Homeward Hills Road
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the. cost of
the improvement, pursuant to M.S.A 429.011 to 429.111.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY
COUNCIL
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City
Engineer for study with the assistance of Rieke Carroll Muller, Assoc.,
and that a feasibiltiy report shall be prepared and presented to the
City Council with all convenient speed, advising the Council in a
preliminary way as to the scope, cost, assessment and feasibility
of the proposed improvements.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on
Wolfgang H. Fenzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
• • •
•
CITY (.7 =MOM
• PLT1T30:: 11;% •
To The Eden Prairie City Council: • •
The undersigned prer.:,rty owoccs !!erein petition the Eden Prz.irie City
Council to consider making the following Jc::•crihed improvements(s):
(General .14.cation)
Sanitary SLwor
•
_y,__ woL,IF e77.4-4t,
Storm Sewer
•
Street Paving gemE4(4446 /7/1/.,tc
Other •
• •
•
Street Address or Other
Legal IA-scrLption 0: Names of Petitioners
Pro-iert— to b( Served .(Must Pe Property Owners)
AM/ 24340--IS a9CLAd&"-
44-7t11)
A4/Z
•‘-e-s cela
60 A_ W. 7/4..).4.4/4:14
g..
•
•
72,_,_,,K_g0 a I A-tfinft
• , -
/ //
•
(For City MO
•
Date Received (rA
Project No. St—
Council ConsiOcr:Ition 676V/V7
•
• IPA ••.•••;: • .4-
•
tT*NN`SO,
° Minnesota Department of Transportation
tr
F )J QO District 5
yrOF TRPNy 2055 No.Lilac Drive
Golden Valley,Minnesota 55422 (612)545-.3761
May 18, 1977
Mr. Carl Jullie
City Engineer
City Hall
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minn. 55343
In reply refer to: 315
S.P. 1011-16 (TH 169) •
S.P. 2744-29 (TH 169) •
S.P. 7009-41 (TN 169)
North End Br. 4175 in Shakopee to
0.3 Mile S.W. of Ring Road in Eden Prairie
Bituminous Resurfacing and Bituminous Shoulders
Plan Approval
Dear Mr. Jullie;
Attached is a copy of the plan and the proposal for providing a
bituminous overlay and bituminous shoulders on TH 169 between the
north end of Bridge 4175 (Minnesota River) in Shakopee to 0.3 mile
S.W. of the Ring Road in Eden Prairie.
Also attached in duplicate are copies of a resolution form for plan
approval and a receipt form for the plans.
Please review the documents and present them to the City Council
so as to receive their concurrence by resolution in approving the
plans. If you have any questions you may contact Mr. Glen Ellis,
Senior Design Engineer, at telephone 545-3761.
The project is proposed for a special June 10, 1977 letting and
therefore the executed resolution for plan approval and the receipt
for the plans should be returned to this office prior to June 8, 1977.
Sincerely,
W. M. Crawford
District Engineer
Anders
by: K: J.. Anderson
strict Engineering Coordinator
An Equal Opportunity EmPloYer I/119
(IF4r::
f vim.I vl 25_3 (Clow. 11-1f) J.P. Tk t,2; .
fed. Prnj. State PunJm, t ,_
•
RCSOLOTI0% 1+0. 77-81
At a (regular) (rpecial) nectin7 of the City Council or the City City of re..,. __e
_ , July held on t:.e—day of , 1S 77, the follo.i.v+
^y
Resolution was offered by ; sreo•IJe'
Lo sit:
.JLRLAS, the Commissioner of the:.epartrent of trensportatioh for the 'Mate of
Minnesota has caused to be prepared: plans, seecie1 provisions an: specific^lions
for the improvement of Trunk lighway "o. 5 , renumbered an Trunk ''.igheay
ho. 169 , within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie
from the West Corp limits to 0.3 mile Southwest of Ring Road in Ease Prairie
to
and,
%'(REAL, said plans are on file in the Office of the department of Transportation,
St. Paul, linnesota; beinr•marker, lat.eled en:: identified aw: S.P. 1011-16 (10i 5),
S.P. 2744-29 (IboaS)and S.P. 7009-41 (169=5 ; an;,
.
\iif lt.5, said special provisions ore on file in the Office of the .+apartment of
Transportation, St. Paul, 'innesota; bsiny marked, lsbole' and identified an:
S.P. 1011-16 (169.5), S.P. 2744-29 (169.5) and S.P. 7009-41.(169.5)
, ens which, together with, the ':innenota .eparteent of
•
Highways Standard Specifications for highway Construction, dated January 1, 1972,
as emended by I:innesota;apartment of highways iupplementel Specifications for
9iakyay Construction, sated April 1, 1976,will govern, and which are on file in
the Office of the Commissioner of.Icpartment of Transortction, constitute the
•
specifications for said improveunnt of Trunk Highway t:o. 5 , renubmbereJ ns
Trunk I ighway pp. 169 ; and,
to(t.CAS, copies of said plans and special provisions as no awrked, labeled end
identified are also on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and,
:A(RCAS, the tern, said plans and*axial provisions, an hereinafter us.1,in the
body of this Resolution will he Jeewed and intended to men, refer to end in-
corporate the plane nnl special provisions in the foregoing recitals particularly
identified mu described; nru,
tht.RCAS, the ro-,iacioner of the department of Transportation Desires in the interest
•
of public safety that any and all parking of vehicles, if such porkinn is
Permitted within the eorporntc liwita of the City of_Eden Prairie , on
Salo Trunk iliniway 5 . rmasds.rsd ars Trunk IScyhway No. 169�
rill be parallel with the curb adjacent to the highway end will be at leant 2C
feet from any crosswalk.
Page 1 of 4 Pages.
ciao
rc.rr .r ✓ . (key. 11-76)
rw, T!Ef., lC IT RESU tr:) that said plans end special provisions for the )'.'rove•
cunt of Trunk Highway w'o. 5 , renumbered es Trunk Highway 'co. 162_, Y•'t'un
the corporate limits of the Pity of Eden Prairie ,be and hereby are an.:rnica.
3E IT ID:l"CT RCSOLVEU that the City of Eden Prairie does hereby agree to
require the parking of all vehicles, if such parking is permitted within the .
corporate limits of said City, on said Trunk Highway PO.j , renumbered Trunk
Highvay No. 169 , will be parallel with the curb adjacent to the highway, and at
least 2O feet from any crosswalks on all public streets intersecting said trunk
highway.
IT fURI!ER RESOLVE.% that the elevations end grades es shown in said plans and
special provisions are hereby aaproved and consent is hereby given to any ant all
c'.an,es in crave occasioned by the construction of Trunk Highway he. 5
rervn9*ered Trunk Highway fib. 169 , in accordance with said plans end special
provisions.
Upon the call of the roll, the follorirn voted in favor of
the resolution:
any, the following ' voted anainst the adoption of the Resolution:
•
whereupon the mayor and/or the presiding off icier declared the Resolution adopted.
*hated: , 1977
tlayor
Attest
City Clerk
STATE (f !!1"VCSOTA )
COUNTY Of Hennepin )sa.
CITY Of Eden Prairie
1 do hereby certify that at a (regular) (Special) Booting (of which due and legal
notice was given) of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie , .H.nnesota,
on the _ day of , 1977 ; at which a majority of the
,members of said Council were present, the foregoing Resolution was adopted.
Civen under my hand end seal this day of , 1911
•
City Clerk
• Page 2 of 2 Parma.
igat
MEMO •
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM; Carl Jullie, City Engineer
•
DATE: June 9, 1977
•
SUBJECT: Edenview I, Kutchers 1st Addition and
Kurtz Lane Sewer and Water Improvements
I.C. 51-300
Attached are copies of letters and a response form which were mailed to
all property owners involved in the above referenced project.
The responses received to date break down as follows: •
Edenview and Kutcher Areas
40 In favor of public hearing
16 Not in favor of public hearing
Kurtz Lane
15 In favor of public hearing
5 Not in favor of public hearing
' Based on this response we recommend that the City Council set a hearing
date for July 19, 1977. We plan to have a completed feasibility report
to the Council for the June 21st meeting.
CJJ:kh
attachments
•
�r' =
- 1z.
j. --� •
/ ,i.1 .
1v.
!' v
0 , ,y_,.. .,...0 , "." ..:, . , ,
. , ,..._ ,
..,_.,
•.,... c) , \ ,- e ." /0/3 -7,... ,x• .-;,.-f:" -'...,-,. =-::-e.: ,--,---. ,
t.
7 15 ,' i 1/ it/.,(\\. .7, `,, .,.,., .4.,._ ,../r.491_,./ , 5 :%Vi,p..:.1'.; :7''''''‘'''A
& '/,,
/ v V ....1 .7
E;CSC ,. ; �4• "r Y
�• - r✓
\ . . ,
•
-.-/- •;.---. .\-•..s.,-- g) • .. . -, .,..,‘-' t../ -,-, c- ., - — \. , ,
. _ . \.:,....
.. - 1.~ K"r o •b 4 =rj
3 4, . ;''.'gyp - '% -- •. 1
vT'
'
i -a,i, 4 ,. . \ 44\ i 'e,•e-'ty ggJ, a \,� Lits d; w /' ,
! L_• U \\. h s a 1•(\
•
ot1^/C• A u 'y
�F• '_ f `• • .GOB' I lA �i
0
{ ... ..^-F, `‘ \1 4-L, sr; .t
i // �y, 0!. m,y -yam h �Yri„�
{ .!,, / .., ' [� „fit w..,- •
\\ 3iyrb ., . •. �r )..^.• y
11.,.; i 74 ° 0 / .� 1323 Z y, - w;e
. ,,-..---., ,1i1)1,'i' s,,,z..ii.:.."iL,ra- -1-.4
ni - x.t, _. O ^1 t1 Ip '+f . ''i ` f � , ,r -.3.i�i(. gi . 4".
3rrl2vO ,ins 4r y{ " ` •e'
_ t
r • T� O_ '�c \ r .r - 6 rN v.. s 3NV 83HJ1f1)1 , �a .. o 'm rv • ` 1 o. ; iJ6' $ « ^
8..! 1 a /
0a
ii
�. p t" J� O m Y y^ �g �b� _
a i.
.,
:LT
17- .I:.w`r-_.•si.r ,Jtf:r 1:;: p•:1 tiu f��.—.f,_" -7b-
->..„, _..6S9 _ bN :4, Y�� • s • s
.K Fri a a
m c 5::72/;:'\----_- o _
rar it .rr V
.f
I avow 6 .L 1311VA 7'.- '♦ - 1 . d'
T.
A b I .yf•�I� . tl , tl •
w 1
PI
IFI m e m O . J w «
LL
•
• 1 .r C - (7j�. P n. .,
- .}..4 <•„, ,
f r ° �:3Ntll M31A H33H7;
N a �' W ij\\� • I • Y
4Z„^ .
June i4, 11-
C1TY or EDER: FFAIr:£
J • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA •
RESOLUTION NO. 77-62
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE •
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF Edenvale
•
Industrial Park 3rd Addition •
•
BE 1T RESOLVED by the Eeen Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Edenvale Industrial Park
3rd Addition , dated , a copy of
which is attached hereto and amended as follows:
•
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of
the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and
amendments thereto and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
• ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
•
yZA3
* .H
EDENVALE,INC.
7766 Mitchell Road•Eden Prairie,Minn.55343.612/941-5300
June 8, 1977
Mr. Carl Jullie
City Engineer
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Mr. Jullie;
Enclosed are 20 prints of the plat for Edenvale Industrial
Park 3rd Addition. This is a replat of the 2nd Addition which
is being done at the request of the Planning Commission and
Dick Putnam which was initiated through our request to vacate
Rieman Road.
We discussed the treatment of Lots 5 and 6 last week and you
suggested that if we were asking for a split of Lot 5 to allow
two buildings under separate ownership that we should establish
a condominium association for Lots 5 and 6 so that common drives
could be controlled. In reviewing this with the prospective
builder, he feels that the negatives of trying to sell a building
involving a condominium association outweighs the benefits of
being able to split Lot 5. Therefore, we have decided to proceed
as shown on the enclosed plat with the understanding that two
buildings cannot be constructed on Lot 5 unless ownership remains
'with one party and that the parcel cannot be split for partial
transfer without express consent from the City.
Please proceed with the approval of the preliminary and final
plat of this addition at the June 13 Planning Commission and
June 14 Council meeting as scheduled. Please forward the •
necessary copies to Dick Putnam.
Yours truly,
,
11.
Donald R. Peterson
DRP/sr
Enclosures
tl19 Y
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
June 14, 1977
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) SET UP LICENSE
Centex Homes Midwest, Inc. Olympic Hills Golf Club
G 6 M Builders
Johnson-Reiland Construction, Inc. FOOD ESTABLISHMENT - Type C
Stanley Klink Bldg. Contr., Inc.
La Lundgren Construction Co. Lyon's Tap
Lyon Enterprises, Inc.
Bruce Peterson SNACK BAR •
Plywood Minnesota, Icn.
James E. Sorensen Const. Q Petroleum
Van Eeckhout Building Corp.
Adolf son & Peterson, Inc. TEMPORARY FOOD LICENSE
CONTRACTOR (Multi-family & Comm.) Zuhrah Flyers
Behlen Building Systems SOLICITOR
Landtech Corp. •
Edward Perrson
PLUMBING
Laurent Builders
Motz Plumbing & Heating
Schulties Plumbing Co.
HEATING & VENTILATING
Bowler Co., Inc.
Northern Heating
Northwestern Service, Inc.
CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE
Eden Prairie Legion Assoc.
These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for
the licensed activity.
IBC �t,r.r.„
Rebecca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk
ug )
•
June 14, 1977
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: .
D5-13-77 5577 INSTY PRINTS Softball score cards 9.50 .
D5-17-77 557B HOLIDAY INN-OWATONNA BCA school for Donna Hyatt 98.801
D5-18-77 5579 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employers contribution and
ASSOC. employees withheld 5-13 payroll 4,878.201
5580 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 5-13 payroll 22.01 }
5581 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 5-13 payroll 5,734.74
5582 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING
ENGINEERS Dues withheld for May 110.00
5583 INSTY PRINTS Printing service-Public Safety 50.2E
5584 STATE OF MINNESOTA Workshop for Dick Putnam and Jim
Jensen 10.0(
5585 VOID CHECK
05-24-77 5586 INSTY-PRINTS Forms for Public Safety 4.7C •
5587 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Title application and plates for
PUBLIC SAFETY new dodge pickup 3.2E
5588 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Title application and plates for
PUBLIC SAFETY new dodge pickup 3.2E
5589 JOHN E. ROLLIN Refund on application for variance permit 25.0E
D5-25-77 559D ARLEN ANDERSON Tree subsidy 25.0(
5591 KEN ANDERSON Tree subsidy 100.0'
5592 ROGER ANDREWS Tree subsidy 50.0(
5593 BRUCE ARMSTRONG Tree subsidy 1,000.0(
5594 G. E. BARNEY Tree subsidy 50.0E °,
5595 JOHN BEAL Tree subsidy 550.0(
5596 GEORGE BECKMAN Tree subsidy 125.0E
5597 VERN BEDFORD Tree subsidy 50.0( *:".
5598 JAMES BENSHOOF Tree subsidy 100.0(
5599 ROBERT BIANCONI Tree subsidy 50.0(
560D B. D. BLANCHARD Tree subsidy 50.0(
5601 HENK BOON . Tree subsidy 50.0(
5602 FRED BOOMER Tree subsidy 75.0( '.
5603 JIM BOYCE Tree subsidy 50.0(
5604 DON BOSSART Tree subsidy 25.0(
5605 AL BREKKE Tree subsidy 600.0(
5606 HENRY BRANDT Tree subsidy 700.D(
5607 HUGH BRENNER Tree subsidy 250.0(
560E BEATRICE BRIGGS Tree subsidy 125.0( ,
5609 WAYNE BROWN Tree subsidy 25.0( `
561D JAMES BURNETT Tree subsidy 775.0('.
5611 J. CAMPBELL Tree subsidy 900.0(
5612 JOHN CARSTENS Tree subsidy 50.0(
5613 RUS CHANCE Tree subsidy 25.O(
5614 LLOYD CHERNE Tree subsidy 275.0C
5615 CONDON NAEGELE REALTY Tree subsidy 325.00
5616 ROBERT CORDT Tree subsidy 25.0E
5617 DOUGLAS DANIELS Tree subsidy 50.Oo
561E DEAVER PROPERTY Tree subsidy 4,080.0('
5619 EDE DESLAURIERS Tree subsidy 150.0(:
5620 LINDA DIEDE Tree subsidy 75.00,
Lu C
June 14, 1977
05-25-77 5621 JOSEPH DDLEJSI Tree subsidy 300.0D
5622 DOUG DDNOVAN Tree subsidy 125.00
5623 LEO DDRF Tree subsidy 25.00
5624 RDLLAND DOUGHTY Tree subsidy 75.0D
5625 RICHARD EHLEN Tree subsidy 175.00
5626 KRISS EICKHOLT Tree subsidy 75.00
5627 FAIRWAY WOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSDC. Tree subsidy 400.00
5628 TED FINHDLT Tree subsidy 175.00
5629 FRANK FDRMICD Tree subsidy 75.00
5630 HELEN FDWLER Tree subsidy 2,975.00
5631 RDBERT GAGE Tree subsidy 50.00
5632 DAN GIESE Tree subsidy 75.00
5633 GORDON GDRMAN Tree subsidy 25.00
5634 GORDON GRABER Tree subsidy 50.00
5635 DENNIS GRAFF Tree subsidy 100.00
5636 MRS. MARTIN GRILL Tree subsidy 1;375.00
5637 KEN GROVER Tree subsidy 25.00
5638 JOHN GUETZKE Tree subsidy 150.00
5639 GERALD HAAS Tree subsidy 225.0C
5640 BOB HALLETT Tree subsidy 75.00
5641 DAN HAMILTDN Tree subsidy 675.00
5642 ELIZABETH HANLEY Tree subsidy 250.0(
5643 JOHN HANSEN Tree subsidy 25.0C '
b644 ROLF HAUGEN Tree subsidy 50.0C
5645 CLAYTON HAWKINS Tree subsidy 25.0C
5646 LARRY HEINEN Tree subsidy 500.0C
5647 JAMES HOEFT Tree subsidy 425.0C
5648 RALPH HOFFMAN Tree subsidy 325.0C
5649 HAROLD HOFSTRAND Tree subsidy 50.0C ;
5650 LOREN IRVINE Tree subsidy 940.0(
5651 RUSSEL JACQUES Tree subsidy 175.0(
5652 LORMAN JARRETT Tree subsidy 100.01
5653 LEE JEDLICKA Tree subsidy 375.0C
5654 MARILYN JENSEN Tree subsidy 150.0(
5655 GEORGE JEPPESEN Tree subsidy 300.0(
5656 HENRY JOHNSON Tree subsidy 25.00
5657 GERALD JOHNSON Tree subsidy 250.0C
5658 RUTH JOHNSON Tree subsidy 225.00
5659 BRIAN JONES Tree subsidy 100.0C
5660 DORIS JURGENS Tree subsidy 100.00
5661 DAVID KAHN Tree subsidy 50.00
5662 JOHN KASID Tree subsidy 50.00
5663 JOHN KENYON Tree subsidy 50.00
5664 MICHAEL KEOGH Tree subsidy 100.00
5665 LEWIS KINNE Tree subsidy 25.00
5666 HAROLD KNUTSDN Tree subsidy 275.00
5667 KEO KORTZ Tree subsidy 25.00
5068 LORRAINE DRETCHMAN Tree subsidy 50.00
5669 JACK KROUGH Tree subsidy 350.00 :
5670 JULIA KUCHER Tree subsidy 675.00
5671 JOHN KURTZ Tree subsidy 75.00 .
5672 GLEN LARSON Tree subsidy 75.00'
5673 DOUG LAUVER Tree subsidy 100.00.
5674 JIM LEROY Tree subsidy 175.00.
yX;r1
•
1
J
•
June 14. 1977
05-25-77 5675 ALBERT LIBKE Tree subsidy 50.00
5676 N. LIEBLER Tree subsidy 100.00
5677 BOB LISTIAK Tree subsidy - 250.00
5678 MAXINE LORENCE Tree subsidy 75.00
5679 JOHN LOVAS Tree subsidy 50.00
5680 O. S. MCCORMICK Tree subsidy 50.00 3
5681 JOHN MCCULLOCH Tree subsidy 50.00
5682 DAVID MALENFANT Tree subsidy 50.0C
5683 MIKE MARTH Tree subsidy 175.0C
5684 MRS. EDITH MARTINSON Tree subsidy 50.0(
5685 HERB MASON Tree subsidy 100.0(
5686 SAMUEL MAYO Tree subsidy 125.0(
5687 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. Tree subsidy 900.0(
56B8 GEORGE MILKOVICH Tree subsidy 200.0(
5689 MILL CREEK HOMEOWNERS Tree subsidy • 550.0(
5690 JERROLD MILLER Tree subsidy 25.0(
5691 MINNEAPOLIS FLORAL Tree subsidy 450.0(
5692 ALLAN MJOLNESS Tree subsidy 25.0(
5693 ROBERT MODEEN Tree subsidy 150.0(
5694 C. W. MORTRUD Tree subsidy 50.0( .
5695 J. J. NAGENGAST Tree subsidy 780.0(
5696 RALPH NELSON Tree subsidy 250.0,
5697 RALPH NIELSON Tree subsidy 25.0(
5698 RICHARD O'BRIEN & ROBERT GARTNER Tree subsidy 50.0( .
5699 VERN OLSON Tree subsidy 150.0( 'e
5700 ROY OLSON Tree subsidy 100.0
5701 GERALD O'SULLIVAN Tree subsidy 25.0(
5702 JIM OSBERG Tree subsidy 25.0(
5703 RUTH OTIS Tree subsidy 25.0( ,� ;
5704 DOUGLAS PAGE Tree subsidy 50.0(
5705 JOHN PALM Tree subsidy 350.0(
5706 RICHARD PARRIS Tree subsidy 225.Oi `,
5707 GARY PAULSON Tree subsidy 25.0( :``:
5708 ALBERT PAVELKA Tree subsidy 25.0( `.
5709 CARL PERKINS Tree subsidy 75.0(
5710 DON PETERSON - EDENVALE CORP. Tree subsidy 3.050.0( • .
5711 DON PETERSON Tree subsidy 75.0(
5712 ROBERT PETERSEN Tree subsidy 275.0( ;`
5713 ALBERT PICHA Tree subsidy 50.0(
5714 LEO PLETSCH Tree subsidy 25.0( i
5715 VOID CHECK
5716 BOB PORTER Tree subsidy 25.0(
5717 FRANK POBUDA Tree subsidy 125.0(
5718 ALEXANDER RATKE Tree subsidy .100.0( '
5719 CHARLES RAUSCHER Tree subsidy 150.0(
720 STANLEY REIGERT Tree subsidy 500.00
5721 JIM REPPHUN Tree subsidy 25.0C.
5722 MIKE REUTER Tree subsidy 125.0C
5723 JIM RICHARDS Tree subsidy 25.0(
5724 DOUGLAS ROBINSON Tree subsidy 175.00
5725 HARRY ROGERS Tree subsidy 50.0C'
5726 EUGENE ROMSOS Tree subsidy 25.00
5727 GERALD ROSS Tree subsidy 350.00.
I,
1
i
June 14, 1977
05-25-77 5728 GERALD RUMMEL Tree subsidy 100.00
5729 JOE RUZIC Tree subsidy 200.00
5730 JOHN SAKELLA Tree subsidy 500.00
5731 STEVE SANDNESS Tree subsidy 75.00
5732 DONALD SARLES Tree subsidy 250.0C
5733 HAROLD SCHAITBERGER Tree subsidy 125.0C
5734 ALFRED SCHENDEL Tree subsidy 100.00
5735 ED SCHLAMPP Tree subsidy 25.00
5736 DOUGLAS SCHMIDT Tree subsidy 25.00
5737 B SCHROEDER Tree subsidy 1,150.0(
5738 LLOYD SCHROEDER Tree subsidy 525.0(
5739 STUERT FOX Tree subsidy 50.0( .
5740 WERNER SCHULZE Tree subsidy 100.0(
5741 ROBERT SCOBIE Tree subsidy 25.0( :.
5742 NINA SEERY Tree subsidy 200.0(
5743 LARRY SERBIN Tree subsidy 50.O( ,,
5744 DONALD SETHRE Tree subsidy 125.Ot
5745 DENNIS SHARP Tree subsidy 75.0(
5746 M. K. SKARNES Tree subsidy 25.0(
5747 JAMES SKRANKA Tree subsidy 50.0(
5748 TED SMITH Tree subsidy 50.0(
5749 DENNIS SOLIE Tree subsidy 50.0,
5750 LYLE SOLIE Tree subsidy 50.0(
5751 DENNIS SPOHN Tree subsidy 150.0 r'.
5752 GERALD SPRINGER Tree subsidy 75.0
5753 GORDON STODOLA Tree subsidy 175.0
5754 DIANE L. STONE Tree subsidy 25.0 ,
5755 ED STUEDEMAN Tree subsidy 50.0 ` •
5756 HERB STUMPH Tree subsidy 200.0
5757 DONALD SUMNER Tree subsidy 50.0 ;r'
5758 WILLIAM TALALLA Tree subsidy 75.0
5759 BILL TERRIQUEZ Tree subsidy 225.0
5760 ROLL IN TIMM Tree subsidy 100.0r
5761 JIM TORNOE Tree subsidy 250.0,
5762 ROBERT TWISS Tree subsidy 50.0
5763 HOWARD TYSON Tree subsidy 875.0,
5764 LEONARD UHERKA Tree subsidy 25.0,
5765 BDB UNGERMAN Tree subsidy 25.0( `.
5766 JACK VANREMORTEL Tree subsidy 100.0(
5767 LARRY VORLICEK Tree subsidy 50.0,
5768 MARTIN TRANSPORT, INC. Tree disposal 760.0(
5769 RICHARD WALKER Tree subsidy 125.0(
5770 J. M. WALLACE Tree subsidy 10D.O(
5771 C. L. WARREN Tree subsidy 75.Ot
5772 JAMES WEDLUND Tree subsidy 50.0(
5773 ALLEN C. WENDLAND Tree subsidy 375.0( :_
5774 JOHN WESTLUND Tree subsidy 25.U( ''
5775 DENNIS WILDERMUTH Tree subsidy 50.0(
5776 JAMES WILKIE Tree subsidy 175.0(
5777 TOM WOHNOUTKA Tree subsidy 125.0(
5778 LELAND WOLL Tree subsidy 25.0(,
5779 NORMAN WOODARD Tree subsidy 150.0(
5780 MRS. JOHN WRIGHT Tree subsidy 25.0(:
ii721
i.
I
June 14, 1977
R
05-25-77 5781 W. ZIMMERMAN Tree subsidy 150.00
5782 M. E. ZYLKA Tree subsidy 1,150.00 (
05-31-77 5783 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK Deductions for bond purchases i
5-27 payroll 393.75 '
5784 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employers contribution and employees
ASSOC. withheld 5-27 payroll 5,063.28
5785 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 5-27 payroll 22.01
5786 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 5-27 payroll 5,993.70
5787 VOID CHECK
5788 STATE OF MINNESOTA Permit to treat Round lake 6.00
06-02-77 5789 CROSBY FIRE DEPT. For six firemen to attend Minnesota
State Fire Convention 180.01 '
5790 STATE OF MINNESOTA Taxes withheld for May 5,210.7E
5791 SCOTT B. ANDERSON Fire service 184.01
5792 CURTIS BERGQUIST Fire service 718.0(
5793 LANCE BRACE Fire service 300.0(
5794 BRUCE BREN Fire service 460.0(
5795 RONALD BURKE Fire service 790.0(
5796 DUANE CABLE Fire service 532.0(
5797 JAMES CLARK Fire service 510.0(
5798 SPENCER CONRAD Fire service ' 492.0( `•
5799 WALLACE CONRAD Fire service 212.0(
5800 LARRY DOIG Fire service 678.0(
5801 MIKE GERDTS Fire service 742.0(
5802 JOHN HACKING Fire service 744.0(
5803 FRED HAFFNER Fire service 1,014.0i
5804 JOHN HOBBS Fire service 334.0(
5805 JOHN HOBBS 1 Fire service 616.0i
5806 GENE JACOBSON Fire service 1,102.0f
5807 DUANE JOHNSON Fire service 598.0f . •
5808 DALE KINSER Fire service 106.0
5809 STEVE KLEIN Fire service 190.0(
5810 MARV LAHTI Fire service 778.0'
5811 M. E. LANE JR. Fire service 388.0: '
5812 ROBERT LISTIAK Fire service 598.0(
5813 LOWELL LUND Fire service 956.(1
5814 JAMES MATSON Fire service 760.0f
5815 RAY MITCHELL Fire service 1,524.0(
5816 TONY MOLITOR Fire service 142.0(
5817 BERNARD NEUMANN Fire service 438.0(
5818 HARDLD NORDSLETTEN Fire service 170.0(
5819 CURTIS OBERLANDER Fire service 966.0(
5820 MARTIN PAULSEN Fire service 672.0(
5821 DOUG PLEHAL Fire service 880.0(
5822 JEROLD PRODOEHL Fire service 618.0(
5823 STANLEY RIEGERT Fire service 1,066.0(
5824 NORBERT ROGERS Fire service 884.0(:
5825 MICHAEL ROGERS Fire service '596.0(. '
5826 PETE RUUD Fire service 242.00
5827 CHARLES SCHAITBERGER Fire service 694.Ou
5828 HARVEY SCHMIDT Fire service 410.00•
5829 GERALD SCHWANKL Fire service 666.00'
5830 EUGENE SPANDE Fire service 582.00'
5831 BURTON SUTTON Fire service 714.0;!
5832 WAYNE TRASSETH Fire service 68.00
5833 MARILYN MITCHELL Fire service 120.00
4Y3U
1
:y
June 14, 1977
i
1
06-02-77 5834 VERNON STEPPE Fire services 690.00
06-03-77 5835 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Sumer recreation brochure mailing 299.5E '
5836 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Mailing utility bills 70.83
5837 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Election mailing 441.9C
06-07-77 5838 PETTY CASH Reimbursement of fund 49.41
5839 CAMP IHDUHAPI Deposit on summer teen work program
camping trip 100.0C ,
5840 ACRO-ADROIT, INC. Office supplies 75.7E
5841 RONALD ANDERSON Reimbursement of expenses for Safety
Alarm seminar 5.00 3
5842 ALBINSON Metal locator-Engineering dept. 428.4` 4
5843 ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION Pipe straps for drainage control 49.2(
5844 AKINS FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. Wrenches and helmets for Fire dept. 142.7:
5845 ACTION REDDY RENTS Rental of postholer for Water dept.
and Public Works dept. 27.0'
5846 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO. Mud flaps and exhaust parts 214.3:
5847 BROWN PHOTO Service and camera film-Public Safety 57.0'
5848 LEROY BECHTOLD Refund on garden plot 5.0(
5849 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC. File cabinet-Park dept. 154.0(
5850 BACHMANS Trees-Tree reforestation 1,138.2!
5851 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES Services-Guide Plan 697.0! ,
5852 CANTEEN COMPANY OF MINN. Refund overpayment on vending machine
license 45.0.
5853 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. Drafting supplies-Engineering dept. 147.7 '.
5854 COM4UNITY ASSOCIATIONS INSTITUTE Membership-Richard Putnam 50.0
5855 CASTLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Lignasan-Tree jdeseaseproject 1,195.0
5856 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY Lime-Water dept. 2,157.1.
5857 COMPUTER ELECTION SYSTEMS Ballot forms-Elections 61.7
5858 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC Testing supplies-Water dept. 57.1 '
5859 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS, INC. Equipment parts and shop supplies 234.1
5860 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO. Rubber stamps-Building dept. 53.9
5861 IIARLYS DAHL Reimbursement for pens purchased for
forestry maps 6.2
5862 DBK ATTRACTIONS is s for Teen Activities 34.5(
5863 ELECTRONIC CENTER, INC. S lies for installing lights on
(:raw police cars 58.6:
5B64 CHERYL ELMGREN Mileage-Recreation dept. 19.9k
5865 EMt1ER TWIN CITIES, INC. Lumber-Riley Lake Beach 612.B1
5866 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CO. Services for May and June 8.0(
5667 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS Ads and photos-Tree desease project 30.9i •
5868 CURT MOLTER Dues for six fireman-Fire Institute 30.0'
5B69 RONNIE FERRICK Refund on guitar lessons 14.0( '
5B70 FAIRFIELD INTERNATIONAL CORP. Odor control liquid-Water dept. 138.5,
5871 JOHN FRANE May expenses 109.6(
5872 STUART FOX Mileage 102.6,
5B73 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. Equipment and paint-Tree desease proj. 476.3,
5e74 FIRESTONE STORES Tires for equipment (28) 1,019.7(
5875 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN. OF MINN. Training books-Fire dept. 32.8!•
'
5876 ROBERT FLINT Services-Public Safety dept. 105.0([
5877 GROUP HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance for June 577.5(
5876 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY Equipment parts-Water dept. 58.91
5879 GENERAL SPORTS Swimming supplies-Recreation dept. 86.4t`
5880 GUY'S AUTO SUPPLY Equipment parts and shop supplies 23.4t
5881 GOODALL RUBBER COMPANY Traffic counter tubing 125.00
June 14, 1977 i
f
s
06-07-77 5882 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. Reapir services-City Hall 34.74
5883 HOWE, INC. Fertilizer-Park dept. 58.44'
5884 HANUS BUS COMPANY Bus services- Commissions 30.0(
5885 FRED HAFFNER Expenses-Fire dept. 40.8(
5886 HANSMANN WELL COMPANY Repair service-House owned by Park dept. 69.2(
5887 DIANNE HANSON Mileage and refund on tennis lessons 41.9(
5888 JACK HACKING Emergency gas purchase 15.1!
5889 HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE Rental of senior high school swimming
pool-Recreation dept. 23.8(
5890 HENNEPIN COUNTY Election labels 121.4; '
5891 HENNEPIN COUNTY Prisoners board and traffic ticket
forms-Public Safety dept. 368.5'
5892 HOPKINS DODGE SALES, INC. Equipment parts 349.4. '
5893 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
CHIEFS OF POLICE Training supplies-Public Safety dept. 90.0
5894 INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATION Dues 165.0
5895 ITASCA EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment parts 77.2
5896 JOHNSON DUST COATING Services-applying oil to streets 3,450.0 i
5897 MARTY JESSEN May expenses 109.0
5898 CARL JULLIE May expenses 122.6
5899 ELIZABETH JOHNSON May services 214.0
5900 MRS. ELAINE JACQUES Bales of straw-Drainage control 12.0
5901 BOB KERN Mileage 48.6
5902 KOKESH Soccer nets-Recreation dept. 133.9
5903 KARULF HARDWARE Supplies-Fire dept. 6.8 ?.
5904 KRAMERS HARDWARE Misc. supplies and 300 bicycle reflectors
for Public Safety dept. (Business
donations) 438.1. ,:
5905 KARULF HARDWARE Misc. supplies 354.1 _.
5906 ALLEN LARSON Crime prevention school 5.0
5907 JAMES H. GANTS Shotgun lock- Public Safety dept. 38.3
5908 LESLIE PAPER Paper towels-City Buildings 105.0
5909 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
SYSTEMS Services 998.E '
5910 JOHN LATZKE Mileage 33.5
5911 LANDCO EQUIPMENT, INC. Hydraulic loader for logs-Park and
Recreations dept. 10,623.0
5912 LEEF BROS., INC. Laundry for rugs and ran 64.8
5913 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC Services-Park owned hour, 3.7
5914 MEDICAL OXYGEN Oxygen-Fire dept. 21.4
5915 MAYVIEW RADIO Repair services 115.6
5916 ROBERT MARTZ May expenses 108.9
5917 WILLARD MCNAUGHTAN Services-Building dept. 832.0
5918 METROPOLITAN ANIMAL PATROL
SERVICES, INC. April services 847.0
5919 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK
ASSOCIATION 1977 Board/Commission Dinner for
Marty Jessen and Randy Retterath 7.5
5920 MEDCENTER HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance for June 722.z
5921 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Asphalt-Public Works dept. 446.7.
5922 MODERN TIRE COMPANY Tires and service 178.9
5923 MINNEGASCO Service 117.4'
5924 MINNEAPOLIS STAR Employment ad-Building dept. 25.3,
5925 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSO. Dues-Fire deot. 46.0,
5926 NESBITT BROS. Disking garden plots-Community Services 25.0,
•
9
•
June 14, 1977
06-07-77 5927 NORTH STAR DODGE, INC. Two 1/2 ton pickups 7,693.7:
5928 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE Services 1,705.9!
5929 NORTHERN STATES POWER Services 6,263.1;
5930 MARSHA O'BRIEN Refund on garden plot 5.0(
5931 DAVID OLSON Mileage 8.4'
5932 OLSEN CHAIN AND CABLE CO. Steel cables-Tree desease project 86.1(
5933 PERSDNNEL DECISION, INC. Services-Public Safety dept. 50.01;
5934 PRENTICE-HALL, INC. Books-Public Safety dept. 13.0E
5935 PHOTO-MARK Refund on softball registration 135.01
5936 J. C. PENNY CO. Equipment repair service 55.0 i
5937 DARRIL PETERSON Services-Park dept.(Cultivating) 100.0
5938 RICHARD PUTNAM May expenses 151.0
5939 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance for June 2,859.9
5940 W. G. PEARSON, INC. 81acktop-Public Works dept. 644.4
5941 PERBIX, HARVEY, SIMONS &
THORFINNSON Legal services 5,342.8
5942 QUALITY REFRIGERATION, INC. Repair to airconditioning-Public
Safety dept. 54.0
5943 RUSS JOHNSON COMPANY Barricades and flashers-Water dept. 231.8
5944 ROLL TANK COMPANY Two tanks - Gardens 372.9
5945 VOID CHECK
5946 ST. PAUL BOOK Crime prevention display 36.7
5947 SPORTS WORLD Hats-Public Safety dept.(C.S.O.'S) 10.0
5948 STATE OF MINNESOTA Terminal-Public Safety Dept. 238.3
5949 STATE OF MINNESOTA Sales tax 664.1 •
5950 EDWARD SORENSEN Mileage 86.1
5951 DONNA STANLEY May services 150.5
5952 VICKI STEWART Refund on garden plot 8.0
5953 STILLWATER Music services for drop-in center-
Recreation dept. 50.0
5954 SHAKOPEE RECREATION & PARKS Registration for trip to Radisson-
Recreation dept. 25.5
5955 W. GORDON SMITH COMPANY Fuel and equipment parts 139.9
5956 DON STREICHER GUNS Camera case for Fire dept. and
ammunition for Public Safety dept. 277.4
5957 TEAM ELECTRONICS Repair parts for intercom-Public Safety 4.2
5958 JOANN C. THOMAS Refund on garden plot 3.0 `
5959 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS Supplies-Recreation dept. 19.2
5960 TWIN CITY SEED CO. Grass seed-Park development 765.0. '
5961 LORNA THOMAS Mileage 22.2,
5962 TWIN CITY TREE TRUST 666 trees-Community Development
project 4,177.1'
5963 TURF SUPPLY CO. Chemicals-Park Maint. dept. 612.6
5964 TECHNICAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC. Supplies-Planning dept. 269.2
5965 R. J. THOMAS MFG. CO., INC. Picnic tables-Rile Lake Beach 1,014.9
5966 TOWNS EDGE FORD, INC. Repair services (81azer $1800) 2;701.6 ' '
5967 ROGER ULSTAD June expenses 100.0 '
s968 SANDRA WERTS Reimbursement of expenses at conference 36.0,
5969 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO. Employees insurance for June and
Life insurance from payroll deduction 599.5
5970 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY Water meters and equipment parts 10,889.6,'
5971 WILCOX PAPER COMPANY Office supplies 177.3,s
5972 XEROX CORPORATION Services 1,212.0
5973 GREG ARENSON Refund on garden plot 3.0'
5974 AMERICAN CONTRACTING CORP. Contract-Est. •1-New Testiment
Church 24,845.&.
413.E
•
June 14, 1977
06-07-77 5975 BROWN & CHRIS Contract-Est. No. 4-Red Rock 2nd 2,408.521
5976 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO. Contract-Est. No. 4-Mitchell Lake-
Pemtom 71,158.93
5977 NORTHWEST BITUMINOUS, INC. Contract Est. No. 3-Westgate East
Addition 20,868.9F
5978 GERALD STEPANIAK Contract Est. No. 1-Forest Knolls
2nd • • 6,529.32
5979 QRS CONSTRUCTION, INC. Contract Est. No. 1-Stewart
Highlands 68,197.0E
5980 SHARON ENGELBREKTSON Make uniform for Joyce Nolte 125.0(
5981 BOB TYSON Expenses 34.91
5982 JIM CLARK Expenses 33.52
5983 MICHAEL ROGERS Installing equipment on new police cars 200.0t
5984 JOHN PALMER Installing equipment on new police cars 288.0(
5585 JACK HACKING Expenses 1.7`
5986 PATRICIA WALQUIST Refund on swimming lessons 8.0t
5987 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Mailing for Teenage drop-in center 72.0(
5988 INSTY-PRINTS Printing forms-Public Safety dept. • 10.8'.
04-15-77 5358 VOID OUT CHECK (4.0
TOTAL 376,537.9:
•
•
•
•
•
1113/