HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/17/1977 JOHN FRANE J.
J.
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, 2
Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam;
Finance Director John Frane; Director of
Community Services Marty Jessen; Engineer
Carl Jullie; Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary
INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING HELD '.PRIL 19, 1977 Page 4581
III. PUBLIC, HEARINGS
Golf Vista Addition by Edenvale, Inc., request for preliminary Page 4591 4
plat and rezoning from Rural to RM 2.5 and P.M 6.5 for the
construction of apartments and double bungFlows. The site is
located in the NF corner of Valley View Head & Golf View Drive.
(Ordinance No. 77-23 and Resolution No. 77-64)
6. Extension of Forest Hili Road to Baker Road,__—I.C. 51.294. Page 4616
Resolution tio. 77-68 —_,____ �_._ ---
C. to-Mob 11 t-ry Kitchen_by CEDO Cuilders, request for PUD Page 4620
concept and h
development stage approval and variances for the
construction of a restaurant/service station combination on
approximately 1.7 acres at 8050 Flying Cloud Drive, "WYE"
Mobil station site. (Resolution. No. 77-65)
IV. kEP(rlil i i' id RG;'15t)kl' COMMISS?ONS
V. ORG_i N•`,NCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. ist_Reading of Ordinance No. 338, amending Hu_man_Rights Ordinance Page 4638
to include Community Based Services Board to : sist all supervised_
res_id^ntial programs or social rehabilitation programs.
8. Resolution No. 77-66__establishinc�ollingolace_L_ Page 4641
C. Resolution No. 77-67, appointing election iudyes for June 14, 1977 Page 4642
Fire Bond Referendum.
D. iesolution No. 77-72, tenorarily�rohibiting the_brim,ing in and Page 4644
insta%lir es residences mobile homes within the City of Eden
Prairie.
Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,May 17, 1977
VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Appointment of one member to the Human Rights Commission for
a three year term.
2. Council Goals & Objectives for 1977-73. Page 4645
B. Report of City Manager
1. City Halt expansion plans.
2. Municipal Liquor_ Page 4649
3. Vernon Seck and Cedric 4tarren's re uest fora rivate off-sale
liquor license. Continued from 3/15 77
4. Sign Ordinance. (Continued from 3/15/77)
5. Request for a Public Hearing for Walnut Addition for June 14, Page 4651
1911.
6. Request for a Public Hearing for Edenvale 14th Addition for
June 14, 1977.
C. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Cash Park Fee Discussion. (Continued from 5/5/77) Page 4554
2. Consideraticn of Boomer Property. (Continued from 5/5/77) Page 4652
3. Gorra Lease. Page 4654
4. Report of Tree Subsidy Program. Page 4656
D. wort of City Engineer
1. Receive 100apetition for City installation of utility and Page 4570
street improvements in the Woodland Addition of the NW
Cdenvale Area, I.C. 51-303. Resolution No. 77-61 - continued
from 5/5/77
2. Preliminary report on feasibility study for utility Page 4657
improvements in Edenview I, Kutcher's Addition and Kurtz
Lane, I.C.51-300. Continued from 5/5777
3. Final plat approval for Garrison Forest 1st Addition. Page 4660
Resolution No. 77-69T-
4. Authorization to advertise for bids for paving machine and Page 4663
roller.
5. Preliminary plat approval for Hipps Mitchell Heights 3rd Addit_ion.Page 4664
Resolution No. 77-71 —
Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,May 17, 1977
D. Report of City Engineer (continued)
6. Receive etition for Ravingon Rile Lake Road I.C. 51-305. Page 4680
Resolution No. 7 -70
E. Report of Finance Director
1. Payment of Claims Nos. 5466 - 5576. Page 4684
2. Clerk's License List dated May 3, 1977 and May 17, 1977 Page 4688
VII. NEW BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT.
1
BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL
(continued from 5/12/77)
BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye,
Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and
Joan Meyers
BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF: City Assessor Bob Martz, Assistant
Assessor Lorna Thomas, and Robert
Kerns, Residential Property Appraiser
INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
II. CONTINUED BUSINESS FROM MAY 12, 1977
III. CLOSE MEETING.
i
1
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 19, 1977 7:00 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan
Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Harlan Perbix; City Engineer Carl Jullie;
Director of Community Services Marty Jessen;
City Planner Dick Putnam, and Joyce Provo,
Recording Secretary
INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were requested to be added to the agenda under the "New
Business" category:
A. Discussion on charge to the Industrial Commission
r
B. Public Relations
C. Voting Machines
i
D. Verbal report on Anderson Lakes cleanup
E. Discussion on Tudor Oaks rezoning agreement
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the agenda as
amended and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY MARCH 15, 1977
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes of the
Council meeting held Tuesday, March 15, 1977, as published. Meyers, Osterholt,
Bye and Penzel voted "aye", Pauly abstained. Notion carried.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Pillsbury Company rezoning, request to rezone 26 acres from Rural to
I-5 Park for construction of Pillsbury research & development facility.
City Manager Ulstad explained that the proponents have appeared before
the Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commissions on two occasions, and have met with the Watershed District.
They have also met on at least 2 occasions with adjoining property
owners regarding berming and parking lots.
y'l�
Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,April 19, 1977
A. Pillsbury Compan,,rezoninq, request to rezone 26 acres from Rural to
I-5 Park for construction of PmsburL research & development facility
continued
Mr. Walker, Vice President of Engineering, Pillsbury Company, requested
that the Council approve the plan in principle with the understanding
that Pillsbury would, together with the City, develop an agreement
setting aside certain areas around Anderson Lakes for the purpose of
wildlife management and open spaces.
Jerry Sincoff, HOK, spoke to the proposal and indicated via models
that the proposal would be developed in two stages. He further explained
that when the plan was first presented there were concerns about the
position of the berming areas and buffer zone proposed; however, since
that time the proponents have met with the adjoining property owners
two times and feel a mutual understanding has been reached with the
residents.
Planner Putnam spoke to the Planning Commission recommendations of
March 28 and April 11, 1977, and the Staff Report dated April 7, 1977.
General discussion took place regarding an emergency connection between
Center Way and the Pillsbury parcel. Putnam explained that the
residents in Northmark were not for it because of traffic going by their
homes to the parking lot. Ulstad stated that the proposal as presented 1
makes fire protection adequate and that the Public Safety Department
did not have a recommendation in a positive manner in tying the road
to the Pillsbury site.
Mike Kinsella, resident of Northmark II, commended the Planning
Commission and Planner Putnam for bringing both the residents and
Pillsbury together so a satisfactory conclusion could be worked
out.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing
and grant the Pillsbury Company PUD concept approval for 228 acres,
and Development Stage approval for 1st Phase construction of a research
and development facility. Motion carried unanimously.
s
MOTION: Meyers'moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the 1st Reading 1
of Ordinance No. 77-21, rezoning from Rural to I-5 Park approximately
25 acres for 1st Phase construction of a research and development
facility. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to direct the City Attorney
to draft a rezoning agreement including recommendations of the
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, Planning Commission,
and Engineering Staff Report. Also general completion of the
Anderson Lakes Park agreement and exploration of emergency vehicle
accesses only, connecting between Center Way and Pillsbury driveway
entrance before the 2nd Readinq. Further that the Planning Commission
review the final building and landscaping plans and forward their
recommendations to the Council for approval. Motion carried unanimously. {
95g�
Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,April 19, 1977
B. Norseman Industrial Park, 2nd Addition by Heile, request to
preliminary plat and rezone 16 acres from Rural to I-2 Park
City Manager Ulstad noted that at the April 5th Council meeting the
Council did request staff to review additional alternatives that
may exist or could be developed that were alluded to in the proposal
as was submitted to the Planning Commission. Staff has reviewed
the alternatives and City Engineer Jullie has drafted a communication
outlining an additional alternative for a future road alignment,
which is located further west of the property.
City Engineer Jullie spoke to his memo dated April 19, 1977 and explained
that staff has looked at three different road alignments to provide
an east/west collector type road connection. Jullie outlined the
three alternatives and further stated that Mr. Helle would support
Alternative "A" and would be prepared to dedicate the necessary
right-of-way required.
William Bearman, 9955 Valley View Road, stated that the Smetana
Lake Sector Plan did show a road somewhere to the east of his property,
thus they oriented their family living to the west and north. The
road as recommended by Mr. Jullie would run about 8 feet in front of their
family room.
William Pearson spoke to the plan as it was when he originally bought
the property in 1958 and hoped the City would adhere to this plan.
i
Gil Darkenwaid, representing people north of Valley View who own
approximately 50 acres, requested that the Council take this property
into consideration for any proposal.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to close the Public Hearing
and approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-19, rezoning 16 acres
from Rural to I-2 Park for Norseman Industrial Park, and adoption
of Resolution No. 77-43,approving the preliminary plat using Alternate
"A" south of Valley View Road with no specific alignment at this time as it runs ;
to the south. Osterholt, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", Meyers and Bye voted l
"nay". Motion failed.
Pauly stated that we have a difficult situation as no one wants a road
through their property without knowing what the land use will be.
Meyers explained she was concerned because of the Smetana Lake Sector
Study and also about traffic flow along with restrictions in the area,
that the City will end up with a situation similar to the industri l s
area at Co.Rd. 4 & TH 5 where our best option is no longer availab�e. She
further stated that by adopting Alternative "B" we at least give 2 residential
properties the option of remaining residential.
MOTION TO RECONSIDER: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to reconsider the
previous action. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing
and approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 77-19, rezoning 16 acres
from Rural to I-2 Park for Norseman Industrial Park. Meyers, Osterholt,
Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", Bye voted "nay". Motion carried.
Meyers explained her "nay" vote on the 1st motion was because the motion
included approval of the preliminary plat as submitted by Mr. Helle.
q�e3
Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,April 19, 1977
B. Norseman Industrial Park Ind Addition b Helle, r uest to preliminary
plat and rezone 16 acres from Rural to I-2 Park continued
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to direct the City Attorney
to draft a rezoning agreement and as part of the agreement calling
for the platting of the Drooerty to include dedication of right f-way
for Alternative "B" of the 4/19/77 City Engineers report and 74t�
Street across the south 40 feet of the 16 acre site. Meyers, Pauly and Penzel
voted "aye", Bye and Osterholt voted "nay". Motion carried.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue the preliminary
platting of the Norseman Industrial Park until the 2nd Reading of
Ordinance No. 77-19 and adoption of the rezoning agreement. Motion
carried unanimously.
IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Petition to be presented to the De ment of Transportation pertaining
to Highway #169 Mrs. Pat McCormick anartd red Baumann
Fred Baumann, 10805 Valley View, distributed information on the residents
petition on Highway #169 dated April 19, 1977.
Don Bossart, who owns triangular part of the parcel on the southeast
quadrant of #169 and #1, displayed a map to Council which he obtained
from the Highway Department denoting proposed road alignments. He further
explained that this is a personal problem strictly between himself and i
the Highway Department and is is not seeking relief from the City.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve and support the petition
as presented by Fred Baumann and Mrs. McCormick. Motion carried
unanimously.
NOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to refer this matter to the
Industrial Commission and request that Mr. Baumann and Mrs. McCormick
present their petition to this Commission. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Baumann thanked the Council for their support and offered to appear
before the Industrial Commission at any time.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to direct the City Manager and
City Engineer to offer any and all assistance to the County Highway
Department or the Minnesota Department of Transportation to facilitate
and speed up the resolution of this issue. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Request from Phillip J Riveness, Executive Director of the South
Hennepin Human Services Council to appear before the Council
Phillip J. Riveness, Executive Director of the South Hennepin Human s
Services Council, spoke to the Position Paper and requested the Council
to approve same.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the Position Paper
on the Community Based Residential Services. Motion carried unanimously.
y5q 0
Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,April 19, 1977
V. RESOLUTIONS & ORDINANCES
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 357 Area "G" of The Preserve Commercial
Plan, rezoning from Rural to G-Re4iona Service and rezoning agreement
City Manager Ulstad requested that this item be continued as there
is a technicality which has to be corrected.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 357, Area "G" of The Preserve Commercial Plan to the
May 3, 1977 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 77-16, rezoning 35 acres for Prairie East
3rd Addition from Rural to R1-13.5 for 85 single family lots
and rezoning agreement
City Manager Ulstad explained that all documents are in order and that
the rezoning agreements have been signed.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 77-16, rezoning 35 acres for Prairie East 3rd Addition
from Rural to R1-13.5 for 85 single family lots and the rezoning
agreement, withholding publication pending resolution of item 5
in the rezoning agreement pertaining to the size and stage of development
of the public parks and better designation, and also clarification of
setback requirements on item 3 relating to fireplaces. Motion t
carried unanimously.
C. 2nd Readinq of Ordinance No. 77-10, regulating the signing of
parking spaces for handicapped persons and relating to enforcement
of state identification certificates
Sargeant Keith Wall and Public Safety Officer James Clark distributed
photos of signs used in Edina and answered questions of Council members.
General discussion took place regarding the size and type of sign
to be used.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the 2nd Reading 1
of Ordinance No. 77-10, regulating the signing of parking spaces for i
handicapped persons and relating to enforcement of State identification
certificates. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Resolution No. 77-54, proclaiming April 24-30, 1977 as Volunteer
Recognition Week.
I
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to adopt Resolution No.
77-54, proclaiming April 24-30, 1977 as Volunteer Recognition Week.
Motion carried unanimously.
VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS !
A. Reports of Council members
1. Council consideration of appointment of Eden Prairie representative to
Hennepin County Landfill Study Committee
Council members unanimously appointed City Engineer Jullie as Eden Prairie's
representative to the Hennepin County Landfill Study Committee.
21)
Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,April 19, 1977
A. Reports of Council members (continued)
2. Osterholt reported on his conversation with the Metropolitan
Airports Commission regarding their willingness to dedicate
land to resolve traffic situation and also land for lighted
tennis courts by ball fields.
3. Bye indicated he thought there would be a traffic problem
with the nursery located on Baker Road and Hwy. 62.
4. Penzel stated he has received an invitation to be extended
to all Council members from Mr. Anderson, legal counsel
for the Tony Team, to go through their building at
6701 West 110th Street in Bloomington, Meyers suggested
that the Tony Team present their proposal through the
proper channels, i.e., Planning Commission, Parks, Recreation
& Natural Resources Commission, and City Council.
B. Reports of Advisory Commissions
No reports. Council members did suggest that this item be put
near the beginning of the agenda to accommodate Commission members
who may be giving a report.
C. Report of City Manager
1. John Suback Liquor License
City Manager Ulstad explained that three years ago when the City
Council approved Mr. Suback's request for a liquor license application,
there was a condition that the building permit be held until the
a
Council was satisfied with the parking spaces to be provided. Ulstad
further stated that the present proposal does exceed these requirements.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt
Resolution No. 77-63, granting a waiver of the
original requirements relative to an easement for additional parking
on the adjacent property to the south, thereby allowing Mr. Suback i
to proceed with a building application and granting him a 60-day extension 1
for a starting date,
2. Discussion on Windslope Project i
City Manager Ulstad stated that he and Mr. Perbix have met with the
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and a representative from this
agency outlined their proposal on changing the siding; however, as of
this evening nothing has been done.
Douglas Rainbow, legal counsel for the National Corporation of Housing
Partnerships, explained that at the present his corporation does not
have another proposal for the Council to consider.
Osterholt questioned the status of seeking a declaratory judgement
at this point. City Attorney Perbix stated the law suit has been
prepared and he is ready to proceed. i
Osterholt recommended that action to secure a declaratory judgement
proceed as soon as possible. The rest of the Council members
wholeheartedly agreed with this recommendation.
y')-F6
Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,April 19, 1977
3. Discussion on Fire Department Bond Referendum
Director of Public Safety Hacking explained that the Fire
Department has presented their proposal before a few of the
community organizations to see how they would react to a possible
fire bond issue in Eden Prairie, and that thus far they have
received 100% support. Hacking also noted that a rough draft
of the literature to be presented door-to-door has been
prepared. In addition representatives of the Eden Prairie
Fire Department are willing to meet with any neighborhood
groups and civic organizations to sell their needs to the
community. Hacking requested the Council consider June 14, 1977
as a possible date for Eden Prairie to vote on the fire bond
referendum.
Osterholt stated that a draft of the literature should be
presented to the Council before it is distributed to the
community.
Fire Chief Mitchell explained that of the cross section of people
represented at the various groups and people he has contacted,
there has been a general consensus they would support a fire bond
issue. However, there were several that would not endorse
anything added to it or any other type of referendum.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution
No. 77-55, determining the necessity and expediency of issuing
bonds and calling a special election to vote on their issuance
for June 14, 1977 in the amount of $998,000. Motion carried
unanimously.
4. Council Goals & Objectives for '77-'78
Continued to May 3, 1977 Council meeting.
5. Request for a Public Hearing for Golf Vista II
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to set May 17, 1977
as the Public Hearing date for Golf Vista. Motion carried
unanimously.
6. Pa ment of special assessments by builders at the time of building
ep rmit
City Manager Ulstad explained that the City has received 3 or 4 requests
from builders that are in and applying for up to 15 permits at a time.
The builders are requesting to move payment of special assessments to
the time of closing or after the building permit has been taken j
out.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to extend the payment
of special assessments to date of closing or 160 days after building
permit has been issued. Motion carried unanimously.
`I jI
Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,April 19, 1977
D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. emcees Concession Stand at Round Lake Park
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated
April 15, 1977, regarding the Jaycee's request for a concession
stand at Round Lake Park.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the Concession
Stand at Round Lake Park deleting beer sales. Motion carried
unanimously.
2. Round Lake Park Property Division 8 Development Plan
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated
April 15, 1977 regarding the Round Lake Park Property Division
and Development Plans.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the
Round Lake Park Property Division 8 Development Plan as per
Staff Report dated April 15, 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Appointment of Tree Inspector
Director of Community Services Jessen recommended Stewart Fox
to be appointed the Tree Inspector for the City of Eden Prairie.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to approve the appointment
of Stewart Fox as tree inspector for the City of Eden Prairie.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. C.E.T.A. Application
Director of Community Services Jessen outlined the C.E.T.A.
Application and recommended approval of same.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No.
77-56, regarding Title VI C.E.T.A. application. Motion carried
unanimously.
5. Cooperative Tree Nursery
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memos dated
March 18, 1977 and April 15, 1977, recommending that the City work
with Twin City Tree Trust and other communities for the cooperative
nursery.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the Cooperative
Tree Nursery. Roll Call Vote: Bye, Meyers, Osterholt, Pauly and
Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
I
y5E8
Council Minutes - 9 - Tues.,April 19, 1977
E. Report of City Engineer
1. Consider bids for utility and street improvements in Stewart
Highlands, I.C. 51-299
City Engineer Jullie spoke to Resolution No. 77-49 and recommended
approval of same.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution
No. 77-49, accepting the low bid from QRS Construction, Inc.,
Bloomington, Minnesota, in the amount of $261,030.15. Motion
carried unanimously.
2. Final plat approval for Prairie East 3rd Addition
City Engineer Jullie spoke to Resolution No. 77-50 and Staff
Report dated April 13, 1977.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No.
77-50, approving final plat of Prairie East Third Addition as
per Staff Report dated April 13, 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Final plat approval for St. John's Wood 8th Addition
City Engineer Jullie spoke to Resolution No. 77-51 and Staff
Report dated April 12, 1977.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution
No. 77-51, approving final plat of St. John's Wood Eighth
Addition as per Staff Report dated April 12, 1977. Motion carried
unanimously.
Meyers requested that the City Engineer's Staff Report be amended
to add a last para. as follows: 3. Cul-de-sac at the south end of
St. John's Drive should be signed to indicate a temporary deadend
situation.
It was the consensus of all Council members to go past the 11:30 PM scheduled adjournment
time.
4. Designation of Valley View Road and Schooner Boulevard from Mitchell
Road to T.H. 169 as an MSA route
City Engineer Jullie spoke to Resolution No. 77-52 and Staff Report
dated April 14, 1977.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No.
77-52, establishing a new portion to municipal state-aid route system
within the City of Eden Prairie. Motion carried unanimously. y
5. Approve Minnesota D 0 T plans for correction of erosion and drainage 1
problems on T H 169 near Riverview Roaa, S.P. a 44-27.
City Engineer Jullie spoke to his memo dated April 19, 1977 and
recommended adoption of Resolution No. 77-53.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 77-53,
approving the erosion and drainage control project on T.H. 169,
SP 2744-37. Motion carried unanimously. {
�'ljH
Council Minutes - 10 - Tues.,April 19, 1977
6. Discussion on extension of Forest Hill Road to Baker Road
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to set a Public Hearing 5/17/77
for the extension of Forest Hill Road to Baker Road. Motion
carried unanimously.
F. Report of Finance Director
1. Clerk's License List
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the Clerk's
License List dated April 19, 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Payment of Claims Nos. 5224 - 536B
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve Payment of
Claims Nos. 5224 - 5368. Roll Call Vote: Bye, Meyers,Osterholt,
Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion on charge to the Industrial Commission
A charge was directed to the Industrial Commission to interview
developers and builders in the community to find out where the
rumors are coming from indicating that Eden Prairie is a difficult
community to build in.
B. Public Relations
Pauly requested staff input on two items: 1) Signs within the j
PUDs for possible multiple sites, and 2) adding a "T" to the Rural
zoning which would stand for Rural - Transitional.
C. Voting Machines
Pauly reported on S. F. No. 1186, prohibiting certain voting machines.
D. Verbal report on Anderson Lakes cleanup
Director of Community Services Jessen reported that Gelco turned out
about 20 people and made arrangements with Krause Anderson to provide
some equipment. Took out about 40 trees but there are still some left.
The trees were loaded and hauled by Krause Anderson to the landfill
late in the day.
E. Discussion on Tudor Oaks rezoning agreement I
City Attorney Perbix explained that in the Tudor Oaks zoning agreement
there is a request that the area designed as open spare be put in the
floodplain zone which the City does not have. There isn't a floodplain
zone under Ordinance No. 135. Perbix stated if the Council is interested
it would take a simple amendment to the Zoning Ordinnace to create a
floodplain district, and that he would come back to the Council with
a recommendation.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adjourn the meeting
at 12:20 AM. Motion carried unanimously. yJ2)p
Ml NUTI:S
CDCN PRAIRIE PLANNING CWt4ISS101
a{-proved
Monday, March 14, 1977 7:30 I'M City Ilall
IV. REPORFS ANT) RItC_0?LVIINDATIONS .
A. Colf Vista,_by filenvale, request to preliminary Plat and rezone from
Itoral fo 101 2.5 approXlmntcl)• 14 acres for :apartments and double bunga-
lows. The site is located in the northeast corner of Valley View Rondfi
Golf View Drive. A continuctl public hearing.
The planter stated the item had bccn continued from the previous meeting at the
proponent's nsgicst and Mr. Peterson is present this evening to explain changes.
Mr. Peter:;011 stated the number of units have rce;ained the same, a walkway
has been added from the multiple to the northern outlot, the col-de-sac serving
some of the doubles is adequately setback from the Golf View 0`1ve and Valley
View Road intersectitn and a small lower outlot is provided for the bituminous
pathway' which will go un.tcr \'alley View Road.
The planucr stated the staff feels the revised plan is a reasonable compromise
and the staff is recouunending approval of the request as it is consistent with
the pUD approved. lie added some neighboring residents desire having diseased
trees replaced nit the upper outlot.
Rearman inquired if any variances were being requested. Mr. Peterson responded
they desire the rental project having the possibility of conversion to condo-
minium, :n+d therefore lot linos between units will be needed and 0 lot line
variances roquesIL"'
suodstrom inquired if some of the drives could be consolidated. Peterson replied
possit)IY. SOndstrom inquired if the s{pace between the multiple and doubles was
sufficient and questioned if the distance could-be widened. i•h.. Peterson stated
the 50 feet between the units is sufficient .
Mr. Stephens, 14267 R'edgcway Court, inquired about the number of units involved
and the width of the driveways. Peterson replied the multiple would have 48
units, the doubles 24 units and th.: drives would be 16-20 feet wide.
Mr. Lee, IF091 SunJial Court, inquired if a stipulation would be Put on the
uac of the no'Ihern outlot prohibiting any recreational development such as
tennis, hall diamonds, etc. Peterson responded the outlot would be turned
over to the F:denvale Association and they would have control over its use.
Mr. Olson.I4.i41 Goif View Drive, inquired if each double unit would have a
to any on-street parkiing on Golf View Drive. Peterson
double ,;arage :md objected
replied till- units would have double garages and perhaps no ]larking could be
posted by the city if necessary.
DRn i oil 1:
Schee moved, Dcarman sec.vlded, to close the public hearing of the Golf View i
Addition preliminary pLtt. The motion carried unanimously.
Motion 7. re nest ;
Schvc moved, Reatmnn aOcundcd, to rccommnend approval of pile rezoning q
scrot- Rural to ItM 2.5 and Rbt 6.5 for the construction of apnrtmentg and dnuhle i
fog:plcr„,, IatoOd upon the revised plan dated IS
Pela. , 1977 and the staff reports
dated Peb. 25, 1977 and Fob. 10, 1977. The motion carried unanimously.
]lot ion 3_
Sclec moved, Rearman seconded, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat
t
for Golf Vista 14 acre multiple dwelling site as depicted on the revised plan
dated Peb. I ' 1977 :.till the staff reports dated I:cb. 25. 1977 and Feb. 10, 1977.
The motion carried wn:mimously, -
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANTING Co?pIISSIOV
approved
Monday, February 28, 1977 7:30 PM City Hall
Sorensen informed the audience as per the request of the proponent and city staff
item IV. B. Golf Vista Addition would be continued to the commission's March 14th
meeting.
i'lannin£ Cor..^:itsion Minutes _z 3pproved
Feb. 26, 1977
B. Golf Vista, by Edenvale, request to preliminary plat and rezone from Rural to
RM 2.5 approximately 14 acres for apartments and double bungalows. The site
is located in the northeast corner of Valley View Road and Golf View Drive.
A continued public hearing.
Continued to March 14, 1977 Planning Commission Meeting ( See page 1
u592
approved
Pl:^nin,: Com:-ission Minutes Feb. 14, 1977
B. Golf Vista, by Edenvale Request to preliminary plat and rezone from Rural
to P14 2.5 approximately 14 acres for apartments and double bungalows. The site
is located in the northeast corner of Valley View Road and Golf View Drive.
A public hearing.
Mr. Enger referred the commission to the memo dated 2-10-77 which outlines the staff's
preliminary review of the project. He stated the units are consistent with the pud
approval, but the staff has concerns about thenumber of parking spaces provided, the
number of trees to be removed, and the maneuverabilityof the hill given the slope of
the entrance road.
'r. Peterson stated they do not plan multiple for the entire site, as approved in the
laud, but instead are proposing double bungalow lots along Golf View Drive as a better
buffer to the surrounding single family. He believed if the parking spaces were increased
it would mean more trees would have to be removed. He asked the commission to allow him
to further work with the staff.
'Minutes 1- Feb. 14, 1977,
rs. Elizer, 14324 itedgeway Court, felt the double bungalows are on too small of lots
A the possibility exists that each lot may have up to 4 cars, some of which will have
to park on the street and the street is too narrow.
Mr. Peterson stated the lots are not small and each lot will have 2 double garages with
additional parking available in the driveways.
Mr. Stiglin, 14045 Forest Hills Road, believed the blacktopping of all the drives
would create an asphalt appearance to the project and to the entrance to their single family.
Mr. Kreibich, 14220 Green View Ct,felt the project would be detrimental to the surrounding
single family values and a traffic problem would result.
Peterson responded that from personally spending time during peak hours ( 2x day ) he
has counted 1 car / 30 seconds and does not feel this project will cause any traffic
Probelm�.
`dr. hhite,14240 Green View Court, felt the double lots should be wider and that when
thr multiple is built to the south traffic problems will occur.
41593
al prnr�•d
r �s.ion '•:inures Q- Feh, 34, 1977
Mr. Ron Lee, 14093 Sundial Court, felt the density of this project and the future multipl(
would be detrimental to the single family.
;retchen Shaw, 7001 Kingston Drive, felt the original pud for Edenvale included some
basic road systems that do not exist today and hence create traffic problems.
Steve Stephens, 14267 hedgeway Court, felt too high of a density is being requested.
Alr. Olson, 14343 Golf View Drive, felt the site should be developed as single family.
Peterson-responded they could not economcially develop this site as single family.
Hussey, 14374 Golf View Drive, felt the project should be modified to prevent future
traffic congestion.
Paul Dallmeyer, 6736 Golf View Drive, felt a traffic study should be conducted
to determine if the project will cause congestion.
Jim Dickey , 34075 Sundial Court, felt the apartments should be owner occupied.
Tom Tennison,14374 Golf View Dr.,felt the project would be detrimental to the single
family.
Motion:
Lynch moved, Suridstrom seconded, to continue the public hearing to the commission's
Feb. 28th meeting for a staff report.
Pauly excused herself from the meeting.
a�9u
COLF VISTA APARTMENTS
AND
D 0 U B L E L 0 T S
P U D DE VELOPMENT STAGE
A P P L i C A T 1 0 N
Dated: January 1977
yy,J9)
APPLICANT GOLF VIEW INVESTMENT CO. and '
EDENVALE, INC.
7766 MITCHELL ROAD
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343
LOCATION Approximately 13.5 acres of land within the
Edenvale Planned Unit Development located
on Lot 2, Block 1 of Edenvale 2nd Addition.
This is north of Valley View Road and
east of Golf View Drive.
PURPOSE To obtain approval os the Development Stage
of the P.U.D., zoning to FJ0.5 and preliminary
plat approval.
INTPODUCTI2Q The following information is presented in
support of the application for reclassi-
fication of this land by the Planning
Commission and City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie. This application follows the
fOrnat of the Planned Unit Development
Procedures adopted by the City.
The site identification, development plans,
and preliminary architectural Dlens are
discussed within this proposal and are
illustrated on the following exhibits:
EXHIBIT A Land Use Plan - Edenvale PID
EXHIBIT B Development Plan - Golf Vista
Townhouse Apartr..ents
EXHIBIT C Prelirinary Plat - Golf vista
Townhouse Apartr-ents
EXHIBIT D Preliminary Architectural
Drawings i
-2- U
<<ii J t0
A. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
1. Ownership - The Apartment portion of the project is
being purchased from Edenvale, Inc. by Golf View
Investment Company. The property will be purchased
by Contract For Deed with releases of individual portions
by Warranty Deed according to the development schedule.
The double lots will be retained by Edenvale, Inc. for
resale to other builders.
2. Developer - The developer of the double lots will be
Edenvale, Inc. and the developer of the apartment portion
will be Golf View Investment Company, a Limited Partnership
formed for the purpose of developing this project. The
General Partners are:
Richard M. Vogel and Eden Land Corporation
who have owned and managed several conecrinium- and
apartment projects in Minnesota and
Florida.
3. Fiscal Economic - Financing will be provided by a
construction loan from local lending institutions as well
as capital contribution by the partners and permanent
financing will be insured under FHA 221-D4.
4. Development Method - The apartments will be leased
out and managed by the General Partners. The double lots
-3-
t/ti"17
will be sold by Edenvale, Inc. to builders to
construct double homes for resale to home owners.
5. Development Timing - The grading work will begin as
soon as possible in Spring of 1977 with construction
to follow immediately thereafter. It is expected
that the lots will be built upon in the Summer of
1977 and 1978. The first 16 units of apartrents will
be ready for occupancy by November, 1977 with completion
of the entire project by Fall of 1978.
6. Critical Public Decisions - The request is for approval
of PUD developrent stage plan, preliminary plat and
rezoning of site to Rm 2.5. The portion of Valley View
Road which has previously been vacated gill be made into
a cul-de-sac and ccnsideration should be given to the
permanent construction of Mitchell Road from new Valley
View Road to Baker Road.
7. Additional Project Information - The apartment portion is '
laid out for future conversion to condominiums.
-4-
B. PLAN AREA IDENTIFICATION
1. The project is located on Lot 2, Block 1, Edenvale
2nd Addition. It is bounded on the south and east
by the Lutheran Church of America site, Valley View
Road and Prairie View Subdivision, on the west by
Golf View Drive and on the north by Golf View
Subdivision.
2. The property is presently owned in fee title by
Edenvale, Inc.
3. Regional relationships — The project is located on a
site which was previously approved for up to 79 units
of medium density housing. The site is located with
good vehicular access on Valley View and Mitchell Road and
close to proposed future neighborhood shopping facilities.
4. Existing Land Use Is Open Space.
5. Existing Transportation — The site is served by Valley
View Road, Golf View Drive and the temporary portion
of Mitchell Road. Consideration should be given to the
construction of the permanent portion of Mitchell Road
from Valley View to Baker Road.
—5—
6. Existing zoning is rural and the site is designated
for up to 79 units of medium density housing under
the Edenvale PUD.
7. Guide Plan and concept stage framework - The guide
plan showed commercial at the NA corner of Valley View
and Mitchell with old Eden Prairie Golf Course on a
portion of the site which ceased to be Golf Course. This
was redesignated church and medium density residential on
the subsequent Edenvale PUD plan. The proposal corresponds
with the designation.
8. General Analysis and conclusions — The use of double homes
along Golf View Drive fits well with the single family use
north in Golf View and lends itself well to the linear
lay of the land along Golf View. The apartments will be
clustered around the top of the hill with the majority of
the natural slope remaining open. The north portion of the
woods on the north side of the site will provide a good
buffer between Golf View homes and the units. The hill i
offers a beautiful panoramic view of the Golf Course area !
and will be an ideal setting for apartment units situated
to use this view.
i
—6-
y 606
C. PLAN PROJECT AREA ANALYSIS
1. Topography and slopes - The topography is shown
on the site plan. The low area at the base of this
hill will be filled with excavated material from the
top of the hill at building sites.
2. Soils - The entire area consists of gravely clay, sand
and gravel and no building problems should be present.
3. Vegetation - The top portion of this hill is wooded with
Oak and Elm. About one half of the existing trees can be .
retained to keep the wooded nature of portions of the site.
Efforts will be made to save the trees in the slopes. The
site plan shows existing trees to be retained.
4. Water - no streams, lakes or ponds are on or adjacent to
the site.
5. Photographic Analysis - An aerial photo of the site is
attached.
6. General Ecological Analysis - The site is a prominent knoll
in the center of a residential and commercial portion of
Edenvale. The hill offers a good panoramic view of the
lower lying ground and is an ideal location for housing units
-7-
y6Ul
situated to take advantage of the view. All
living rooms of the units will share the view and
access will be from the center of the project. The
site is extremely rough and a large portion of the site
will require grading for any intended use. The plan
will allow about 50% of the existing trees to remain
to retain the wooded character of the site.
D. PLAN PROPOSAL
1. Development Objectives - The objective is to provide medium
y density housing which will utilize the site to its best advan—
tage. The double units offered for sale to builders will
provide lots on the Golf Course portion of rdenvzle which will
be priced to reeet marl-.et demands. The apartments will offer a
different type of unit than Shadow Green and will be located
on an extrerely desireable site.
2. Site Plan — A site plan is submitted.
3. Grading — A utility and grading plan is submitted.
4. utility Plan — Shown on utility and grading plan•
5. Preliminary Architectural Drawings — Preliminary drawings
of the apartment units are shown.
q(o02
6. Legal Instruments — No owners association will be used
other than the Edenvale Association. The Edenvale
Association legal documents have previously been reviewed
and filed. Outlot A will be deeded to the Edenvale Association.
7. The housing land use profile is shown on the site plan.
8. Zoning Classification — It is requested to rezone the site
to Rm 2.5 to allow both double units and apartment units.
9. Phasing and Construction Schedule — It is expected that city
review will take until }larch 1, 1977 with final plsn
preparation and financing arrangements completed by June 1,
1977. Grading will begin in June or July, 1977 with first
occupancy of units scheduled by Noverber 30, 1977. Lots will
be prepared in May and June, 1977.
10. No additional Information is submitted.
uLO3
iii /
.r
,o
1a
'_m
Z j f
O
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CHECK LIST FOR RFVILIWI14G PROPOSED
LAND UVELOPMEN'PS
DATtic 3/11/77
pL•'VEhOP11ENT
Golf Vista L.D. NO. 77-P-z-06
LOCATION: N.E. corner Valley View Rd. & Golf View
RF,rEREHCT: P.U.D. OR PREVIOUS
ZON114G .AGREEMENT: Part of the Edenvale P.U.D. RES. #.
DSVFIAPER: Edenvale, Inc., and Golf View Investment Co.
ENGIt7L•'Eli/PLHNNER: Don Peterson, Edenvale, Inc.
DOCUMLNTS SUA11ITTE7 FOR REVIEW; Revised preliminary plat and revised utility and
grading plans dated 2/15/77
PROPOGAL: Developer is requesting rezoning and preliminary plat approval for
apartments (48 units) and double bungalows (24 units)
1. Land Dovelopnunt application filed and filing fee & deposit paid YQ6 _
Yes
Cory of application, forwardeu to Watershed District —
2. Processing Schedule:
a. Planning & 'Zoning Commission Preliminary
b. Park & Recreation Comnission
c. Human Rights Commission _
d. Planning Commissirs,l Public Hrg.
3/14/77 (cont'd.)
e: City Council consideration
f. Watershed District
3. Type of D(WelOPment __ Multi family residential _
4. Enviroim,ental as:a:rtiment or impact: statement required per Environmental
Impt:ct policy Act of 1?73s
Not required
L140'
2 -
5. Present Zoning Rural
G. Proposed Zoning RM 6.5 for lots 1-12 and Rig 2.5 for lots 13-18
Consistent with approved P.U.D. or Comp Plan? YeS
List variances required & setbacks that apply: No variance requested
7. Project Area 13.5 ac. Density 9.14 U/ac
B. Public open space and/or cash dedication Outlots A and B shall be permanent
open space and deeded to the Edenva a Homeowners Assoc.
Private open space
Trail systems & sidewalks Connection to underpass on Outlot B.
Range of lot sizes 13,050 min.
9. Preliminary Building Plans submitted for Apt. units
10. Representative Soil Borings None submitted
11. Street System `
A. Access to adjoining properties O.K. Apt. units shall have access directly
south to future Valley View Road.
B. 9 m R/W Roadway (hack to Back of curb)
Private
driveways, no 24
parking ----- Post no parking signs Required
Leading to Cul de sacs 50 28. Required
(not over 1000') &
minor residential
Cul do sacs 100 78 (no island)
120 98 (with island)
i
Thru Residential (collectors)
& Cul do sacs
over 1000' 60 32 {
yloU�
• - 3 -
MSA 70 44
Parkway 100 28 divided
Fire Road 12
Pathways 12 6
Street grades-max. 7.5%, min. .5%
Concrete curb & gutter required,
Deep strength asphalt design Required
C. Check city's comprehensive street system.
Developer builds 1/2 of parkways at his cost, & R/W dedication N/A
D. Street Names'- try to conform with existing in the area. Avoid additional
names on cul de sacs having eight or less lots.
Check list of existing street names. None required for cul-de-sac
E. Private parking lots--BG-12 cone C&G and full depth asph. design
R
F. Street Signs-Developer or City installs Developer purchase - City installs
12. Parking: (See Ord. #141) O.K.
13. Utility Systems:
A. Sanitary Sewer
O.K.
1. Service Detail
2. Service to adjoining property
g. Watermain: O.K.
i
1. Check Service Design (20 psi at highest fixture) will have 5Q Va a..a;lable i
2. Hydrant location-Fire Inspector
3. Valving
4. Compliance with fire code
5. Service to adjacent property
i
C. Storm Sewer Grading Plan required for disposal of storm water from
& __ • -- -•--'-"-" •
Apt-
1, Sediment control plan To be prepared for Watershed District 622LQYal
2. Skimming & grit control for commercial parking lots N/A
3. Positive outlet for drainage ponds N/A
4. Avoid excessive grading and tree removal O.K.
5. Arrows showing drainage Required
Accomodate drainage from adjacent properties O.K.
6. Denote drainage area for individual inlets and projected high water
for ponds
7. Keep drainage in gutters, not in center of street Required
8. Sod drainage swales and steep slopes Required
9,. r'lood plitin encroachment _ None j
\' 10. Watershed Listrict approval Riley-Purgatory Creek for utility,
grading and road plans
11. DNR approval Not required
D. Natural Gas & Telephone Proposed
E. Electric (underground) Proposed
14, Strut Lights & On-Site Lighting Lighting plan required for apt, site
15. Preliminary plat to be submitted to MID or Henn. Co. if abutting a
State or County 17wy.
N/A j
i
1.6. List special assessments levied and pending
#5864 - Mitchell/Baker Rd. $12,653
#5858 - Trunk sew/water $16,851
17. Re-zoning agreement required Yes
Developer's Agreement required Yes _
i
i
Title Abstract for Attorney's review Not required,
I
i
y1�7�
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Chris Enger, Landscape Architect
THROUGH: Dick Putnam, Planning Director
DATE: Feb. 25, 1977
PROJECT: Golf Vista
REFER TO: P.U.A. Development Stage Application Staff Memo
Feb. 10, 1977 (attached)
BACKGROUND
Factors identified as problems in the original plan by the staff,
Planning Commission, and Golf View residents were:
1. Not sufficient parking space (area behind each garage does not
apply as a space under Ordinance No. 142.)
2. 50% of trees on site lost.
3. 10% grade on old Valley View Road ending in cul-de-sac with no
"start up space" at the bottom for winter conditions.
4. Outlet not provided through to Valley View Road trail system.
S. No "mini open space" designated for medium density housing type.
6. Too many double bungalows fronting on Golf View Drive.
7. Residents complained of too much density; too narrow of duplex lots.
Mr. Peterson has revised his plan to take many of these things into
consideration:
1. The parking area behind each unit will continue to be utilized as
a parking space, but overflow parking of about 20 spaces will be
added to the east of the site. This will bring the total parking
to 1 enclosed space per unit and 1 unobstructed open per unit as
specified by ordinance.
2. Under this type of site plan, the amount of trees lost cannot be
significantly reduced. The planning staff, after viewing the site ;
again, concedes that while it would be nice to save all the trees, .if
major selected trees are saved to soften the project and diminish its
scale, the plan as proposed is acceptable.
3. The cul-de-sac has been moved further west to give some flat space before
the 10% grade.
4, 5.• Outlet B has been changed in configuration to allow easier access to
the main pathway. A mini play space has been provided in the form of
Outlot A on the north end of the project, approximately 1001x300' in size.
L160
Staff Report - Golf Vista -2- Feb. 2S, 1977
6,7. The number of double lots fronting onto Golf View Drive has been
cut from 8 doubles to 7 doubles, also increasing their frontage
from 80 to 100' in width.
DDITIONAL COHNIENTS ON REVISED PLAN
The Planning Staff feels that the addition of the parking spaces mentioned
is important and should be required.
An additional leg should be added to Outlot A along the east side of the
project to give free access from the apartments or condominiums to the
Outlot.
The staff feels the revised plan is substantially better than the original
submission because of the concerns addressed.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve revised preliminary plat and rezoning of the 23 double
bungalow lots to R.N. 6.5 and the 48 apartment units to R.M. 2.5,
with parking to be added and extension of Outlot A, contingent
upon the Engineer Staff Report.
2.. Deny proposal.
RECO MENDATION'S
1. Planning Staff recommends alternative one.
yG10
i
( � r
09
LC /ram t.,' \,•
1: Id IR �• ���
r_C
11
' OYT40T �y-•-' � � .•
—AKTMr.NT UNITS
�'t TnL 9AWt NC- UN.TL 7G
S2'N91T1� 1 9.G'. VJ/KNl
LL'Jli ;I LNr .
R�rr.� �t,rbaAwhlat.S •
• j 16M 'b
;� BL JI LY 1 I •�► 1
' pp
•p OVTLr': 19
pr+Jr,.S iL.•f•'A:�G'N' �"T.) I IX
A♦AKT:�1':VT VI•'�Ti � �G
TIT 4 GWfuNN 1/MIT fi 1 72 '
OCN3r,Y t d 37 L:V/�aKl ,
oA r:Y,l rr r. ..r/ xl+crs ,r r../..n,r u•r.
t/G 12
MEMD
' TO: Planning Commission
FR01f: Chris Enger
DATE: Feb. 10, 1977
SUBJECT: Golf Vista Addition
BACKGROUND
In the original Edenvale PUD the site was designated for multiple family of
79 units giving a density of 5.9u/acre. The current proposed plan is con-
sistent with the original PUD.
SITE CH.4R4CTER
The site is located in Edenvale south of the Golf View single family area,
( Edenvale Sixth Addition ), It is bordered on the west by Golf View Drive, '
the south by Valley View Road and on the east by existing single family homes.
A future church site is depicted southeast of this project. The old Valley
View Road right-of-way cuts through the bottom third of this site running
east/west. There is a high pressure gas main running under this road right-
of-way and a sewer trunk line.
The site is primarily a steeply rising wooded knoll with a base elevation
of 864' rising to a high point of 926' .
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
The proposed site plan places 14 double bungalow lots around the lower part of j
the site on Golf View Drive and Valley View Road which are serviced from a {i]
cul-de-sac constructed on the old Valley View Road right-of-way from the east.
The sharp wooded knoll which occupies the majority of the site is developed j
by the use of walk-out 2 story apartment units in groups of eight which wrap !
around the mid-point of the slope and are serviced by a loop parking arrange-
ment .
The grading required for the siting of the units is not significant and they
should fit into the hillside very well. However, to obtain correct amount
of parking a significant flat notch must be taken out of the hill which will
eliminate all but about 35% of the major vegetation on the hill. This wooded 1
hill is of prime significance as viewed from the north and the existing single
family , and as viewed from the south can be seen all the way from TH S.
yGl�
Ilmo-Golf Vista Addition -2- .Feb. 10, 1977
In addition to the large removal of trees from the top of the hill the
• required parking for this type of unit is met by counting 1 parking space
behind every garage unit as a usable space. In the planning staff's
opinion , from past experience with projects such as Chestnut Apartments,
this type of approach to the parking requirements is not what is envisioned
in Ordinance 135 and 141. We believe this type of parking arrangement
will work poorly in an apartment type situation and cause very severe man-
agement problems. I have spoken to Mr. Peterson about decreasing the
grade of the East/West cul-de-sac for winter time use by moving the
cul-de-sac approximately 70 feet to the west to obtain a flat space so
that the 10% grade uphill may be easier to negotiate. This will require
moving some lot lines but will also offer the opportunity for the remolding
of outlot B so that it may include two trail transportation fingers, one
to the north to serve the apartments and one along Valley View Road to be
part of the major trail.
RECOAL' NDATIONS
The planning staff would recommend that the Golf Vista public hearing be
'continued so that Edenvale may have time to respond to the ideas generated
from the first Planning Commission meeting and to possibly work with
the city staff to obtain an overall site plan that'will respond better to
the character of the wooded site.
• I
Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District
•
8950 COUNTY ROAD 94
r..... EOEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343
4
i
February 11, 1977
Mr. Richard Putnam, City Planner
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
ke: Garrison Forest; Edenvale Plaze, Golf Vista Apartments
Dear Mr. Putnam:
The Engineering Advisors for the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District
have reviewed the development proposals for the above referenced projects as
submitted to the Watershed District. A grading and land alteration permit
must be obtained from the District for these projects. The permit application
should be obtained after the development has been approved by the City Council,
but before land alteration can begin on the project. Plans detailing how
erosion will be controlled during project construction must accompany the
permit application.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these developments. If you
have any questions about our comments, please contact us.
Sincerely,
Allan Gebhard
BARR ENGINEERING CO.
AG/sb Engineer for the District
cc: Mr. Frederick Richards
Mr. Conrad Fiskness !
MEMO
T0: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: May 12, 1977
SUBJECT: Extension of Forest Hill Road
I.C. 51-294
Attached are petitions received which relate to the connection of
Theresa Place and a stop sign request on Golf View Drive. If Forest
Hill Road is extended to Baker Road it would be appropriate to place
stop signs at the intersection of Golf View Drive and Forest Hill
Road, but not at Greenview and Sundial Court as petitioned.
We are now in the process of completing some additional traffic
counts on old Valley View Road, new Valley View Road, Golf View
Drive and Kingston Drive. These traffic counts may be helpful as
the Council considers the Golf Vista development and the Forest
Hill Road extension. We will have a complete report for the Coun-
cil on Tuesday evAning.
CJJ:kh
Attachments
�p
q&jt-
A
, _ 1
May 2, 1977
Eden Prairie City Council
Eden Prairie
Minnesota 55343
Gentlemen:
We have been discussing one of the proposed changes in
our Eden Prairie road system; namely, the extension of
the existing dead end at Theresa Place towards the
south.
We are certain that there will be proper public hearings
on this proposed change; but, in the meantime, we wish
to register what amounts to our complete opposition to
this plan.
Si:}cerely,
J
�,K
ohn & Lois Westlund
13730 Theresa Place
Donald & Alice Suimer
13720 Theresa Place
Donald & Sharon Opheim
13731 Theresa Place
W4��
O .om
1_24741- 4)4_ 41
Ir
Lk
�2p
Cl-t
(7 v q
4e
(,;,) 2�u .tirt, ��i�t c v �. ���,i ��• �` ��vx
Y., /��/ ('tti7U!-(,..Li CND lJ,'f.l1QYL (/.,1.C1.tAT LK.�i✓�i �.LJ'LC�'
C viz. LeQ )`xcx-Z c7ef Jim .tc(,(gj-
</ �
u.E c J.crl ,L ,t,V `/7i.C..G ,!•>nA:a�-��C-<cz�.- Gz.u cx..� .
�� (�,r,:.*cG,�-Z. c"� fiLc"'-� .•�-t. ct,1cL- Y1♦R.i n�"���,�t�„c, �z,t�-L
_G
x�Ley-� .��Cj J1J ,L•,Z LUt"Ll,l�i itZLG ,
/ J
S"" ezz C'zi
r�'i2 ��'!Z.! /��`G"'t!�''G�L�'i�G�-C✓ �/o�•� 7(�✓��,-/'�C, ✓ Lt:L c,. I
//i1 1i17 >ILL CI f !Z(1?.iY�.�-C/ /�•�7.3 )NN="L `;/za4)Xs f j
/,' � //try✓ (.�L t�
.Ct141 9nL.i zc ,j)&Ic� C Jr "f5 <3ZcrtCLutlZ t"_� .
/,� tA
/27.i 7llLt ,C ,d,
�s)�-��i �1c�/5���"tr.✓ �fFuJ C c...cT`"
I
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Comnission
FMM: Dick Putnam, Planning Director
DATE: May 9, 1977
APPIA CANE; CEllo Builders, Inc. S Country Builders Inc.
LANDOWNER: W. Gordon Smith Company
I'MIKT: Restaurant/Service Station proposal
LOCATION: tl.U.Igye Mobil Station at intersection of
W. 78th Street and TH 169
REQUEST: PUD Development Stage approval with variances:
1. Sethacks front, lido and rear yard.
2. Sign variance
3. Screening and landscaping variance
REFER TO: -PIID Identification Analysis Brochure
-Zoning Ordinance 135
-landscaping Ordinance 178
-Parking Ordinance 141
-Sign Ordinance: 261
-Major Center Area Report
BACKGROUND
The W. Gordon Smith Comp..^.ny has been considering rebuilding the existing Wye
Station and C;ifc for some years. 'fhcir plans tmrc dependent upon the
opening of Homart and more• importantly the scheduled road improvements
to tIS 16lI as it affects their properties.
The c,archouso and iwlk plant previously located north of US 169 across
from the P;yc station %cis purchased as part of the US 169 improvement
project and W. Gordon Smith Company ,(:located their bulk operation along
'111 5 and It'allscu Road.
The 1.7t acre site is zoned Ilighcray Commercial and has existed since
the 1930,; os a service station/cafe. Road realignments and right-of-way
ac(aisitirnci, crere conq)Icted early this year allowing detailed planning to
c0am;cnce on the Mobil / Country kitchen project.
Staff Report-Wye/Country Kitchen -2- May 9, 1977
City Approval Procedures:
The applicant has su►nnitted a PUD Development Stage and variance application
for the 1.7 acre site consistent with the recommendations of the MCA Report.
The proponent could have asked for variances under the orocess adminis-
tered by the Zoning Board of Appeals for signage and setbacks, or the
applicant could have built according to Zoning Ordinance 135 and related
ordinances pertaining to signage and landscaping.
CITY ORDINA,NCP.S AND 1101.1CIES
MCA/PlJD Plan
The MCA Report recognized the improvements needed in the Wye site. On page
82 of the report the Wye site is described as follows:
The small 1-acre triangle between 169 and West 78th
Street,known as the"Wye" service station and cafe,
has functioned as an auto and truck service facility for
over three decades. The station will change with the
construction of new 212 and the rerouting of 169,be-
coming a station which services the regional center and
community needs. Modification of the existing traffic
pattern around the Wye, combined with Homart's
circulation pattern,will create a new set of access re.
quirements for the Wye site. The service station and
perhaps restaurant use is required near a regional mall,
and the Wye is ideally suited for this use."
r
I
The MCA Report on page 71 Pn ouragcs the use " of PIID procedures
should he utilized in processing all developments within the MCA. These
procedures :nut requirements would be specially tailored for the MCA and
will not, be applicable to other sectors of the city."
116a1
Staff Report-Wye/Country Kitchen -3- May 9, 1977
"The concept of multiple use development which would integrate a variety
of uses within a single structure or between adjacent sites is encouraged.
Special design and zoning considerations will be used in evaluating mixed
use developments in the MCA."
The MCA Report encouraged high density urban development that would
encourage various types of transportation "
" Primary movement mode will be the automobile during
the next. decade in the MCA. Land development should
take into consideration the requirements of parking,
efficient circul:.tion and building density will be
reflecting requirements of the autobmobile."
" Free-standing commercial and office uses should be
connected not only with the automobile system but
with useful pedestrian and transit corridors."
Zoning Ordinance k135, Sj,Ln Ordinance ff 261, Parking Ordinance N141,
Landscaping Ordinance A 178
The 11ye site is zoned C-Iiwy Commercial which permits business "serving to
highway and freeway travelers and tourists" . . . and "to provide appro-
priately located, coordinated developments with adequate space for highway
user commercial services . . . " ( Ord. 135, Sec. 7, Subd. 7.1.4)
The revised site plan ( 5/3/77) will require approval of variances to
city ordinances. The following table summarizes those variances needed
to complete the Wye/Country Kitchen project.
City Standards/Requirements Revised 5/77 Wye Plan % variance needed
Zoning Ord i n:nuc MSS
minimumyard,;: - --
front 35 feet US 169 range from 2-35' yes 95-0 %
side 20 " corner 78th St. 7' yes 30
rear 10 " adjacent to liontart 0-2' yes 100-80
Parking; Ordinance #141:
total spaces
restaurant 1/3 seats 73 spaces no
service station 10+,p;tccs 1/2 seats, rest.+21 for
service station
i
parking not allowed in
front yard 35' and only yes,both front and
in 1/2 of side yard closet parking in front and side yard
to street in corner lot side yard 169/W. 78th
Staff Report-Wye/Country Kitchen -4- May 9, 1977
City Standards/Requirements Revised 5/77 Wye Plan $ variance needed
Sign Ordinance ll 261
C-lhay District:
1. wall sign 15% mall area information not provided ?
2, 1 pylon sign/street 3 pylon signs ( 1 C.K., yes l additional pylon
frontage 2 Mobil) sign if 1 site, 2 users.
2 sites-no variance need(
a. 80sq.ft. lst sign information not provided ?
b. height 20 feet information not provided ?
3. pump sign, part of gas information not provided ?
pump
4. Misc. signs information not provided ?
(rest rooms, directional)
5. roof signs prohibitcgi 15'x15111t°;asus signor 225 not normally permitted
sq.ft. each face under city ordinance.
handsca�ing Ordin:uzee V 178
1. Screening/landscaping S"a screening proposed in yes,not possible to
surfaced area for land - revised landscape plan screen parking pump area,
scapingr given site plan in all
cases (estimate 85-90%
of parking areas visible
from streets).
P11D Proce'luros of Ord. H 13S
Eden Prairie provides a process for "variation from the provisions of this
Ordinance including, sethacks height lot area,w idth and depth, yards, etc.,
in order to :
" a, UncoUrnge more creative design and development of land.
b. Promote v:n'icty in tlzc physical development pattern
of the Village.
c. Concentralo open space in more usable areas or to preserve
unique natil"A resources of the site. j
d, preserve and provide a more desirahle environment than
would bo possil,ic under strict intorpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance or Subdivision Regulatiou!;"
Vie Wye dovolopngent p1:!n of 1.7 acres does not by itself meet the 25 acre
mininann size requirement of the 1'1l1) District, however, the location in the
Major Center Arca which is an approved POD would satisfy that requirement.
q03
staff Report-Wye/Country Kitchen -S- May 9, 1977
Nye Revised Plan 5/3/77
The revised plan responds to the following concerns which the staff dis-
cussed with Jesse Schwartz Jr.
1. greater setback at W. 78th Street/US 169 intersection
10-35 feet.
2. greater space at W. 78th Street entrances from station
pumps.
3. defines sign locations.
The revised plan has not made substantial changes to the following items:
1. Parking is about SO% over city requirement. 73 vs. t44.
2. Conflicts at W. 78th Street entrances with cars at pumps,
parking and traffic lanes.
3. Use of Eden Prairie Center parking lot in order to reduce
onsite parking
A. Country Kitchen sign location 20 feet from US 169 curb.
S. The type , design, size and number of signs is not clear.
6. The building and basic lot layout remain the same as originally
submitted.
1
Staff Report-Wye /Country Kitchen -6- May 9, 1977
SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting PUD Development Stage Plan approval in order
to construct a combined restaurant/service station use on the Wye site
in use today.
The applicant determined that variances from certain city ordinances would
be required in order for the use of the 1.7a acres in as an economically
feasible manner.
The "Wye"Mobil/Country Kitchen proposed revised site plan will require
granting; numerous variances to city ordinances. Variation from the strict
requirements of city ordinances are not uncommon within PUDs, normally the
issues deal with the number and extent: of the variance. The "Wye"/Country
Kitchen proposal ;asks for variance consideration in these areas:
front, side and rear yard setbacks, screening of parking areas and
sign ordinance standards.
No one can question the good intent of W. Gordon Smith Company in their
efforts to improve the existing station/cafe. The building design architec-
ture unifies the uses in an attractive structure, access and safety are
greatly improved ovor the existing site conditions--the plan is a significant
improvement to the Major Center Area site.
A LIT RNAT]VI:S
The Planning Coinmission i_s placed in a difficult position inn formulating a
rcconuncn(k:tion to the City Council. The owner has stated that significant
changes to the revised pl:m such as enlarging the setbacks or reduced
signing will stop his proposed improvements. That would force the 11. Gordon f
Smith Comjmny to either sell the site and business or improve the existing
building a small amount or reconsider a different restaurant/service station
combination.
The commission may establish by their recommendations on the Wye proposal
a precedent in development of similar commercial sites. The question of
"unnec.es.:ary hardship" or"special privildge"are judgements to be made by
the commis:ioif uamibers in reaching a recommendation to be forwarded to the
City Council.
Ordinance 11 135 , Solid. 17.5 defines the basis upon which the Zoning Board
of Appeals can gr:mt or deny variance requests:
1. Strict interpretation or enforcement would result in a
Practical difficulty or unnecessary har(L hip inconsistent
with the intent of this ordinance and the Guide Plan.
2. There arc exceptional or extn•ndinary circumstances or
condition,; app:"cable to the property, use or facilities
that do not apply generally to other properties in the
same district.
3. Strict or literal interpretation would deprive the applicant
of the use and enjoyment of his property in a manner similar
to other owners in the sane district.
4. Granting a variance will not constitute a special privildge.
Staff Report-Wyc/Country Kitchen -7- May 9, 1977
S. A comprehensive list of conditions for a particular use
or facility has been adopted by the Village Council by
Resolution.
6. Granting a variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the
public or private properties or improvements in the vicinity.
When these conditions are considered with the intent of the PUD purposes
no clear-cut recommendation is evident in the planning staff's opinion.
DP:jj
i
J ,
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Unapproved
Monday, May 9, 1977 7.30 PM City Hall
COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Sundstrom, Schee, McCulloch, Bearman, Lynch,
Retterath
COMMISSION ABSENT: Redpath
STAFF PRESENT: Dick Putnam, Jean Johnson
IV. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Country Kitchen / Mobil Station,.by CEDO Builders, request for PUD Concept
and Dpment Stage approval for the construction of a restaurant/station
combination on 1.7 acres at 8050 Flying Cloud Drive with variances.
The planner referred the commission to the staff report completed that evening
and stated the council has a public hearing set for May 17th.
Jesse Schwartz Jr., W. Gordon Smith Company, outlined the changes to the plan as:
greater setbacks provided, less parking on the east side and improved access to
the site. He stated their sign request is 1 sign on the east side for Mobil, a small
price sign on the west side, a Country Kitchen pylon along US 169 and retention of
the Flying Red Horse as a roof sign. He estimated the total square footage of
the signs to be less than 100 squ;+re feet. Due to the hardship of developing
the site he stated variances are being requested from city ordinances.
The planner reviewed the staff report stating the combining of uses is consistent
with the MCA Plan and the existing procedures for PUDs allows for variance from
ordinances if objectives as outlined in Ord. 135 are met, but in the planning
staff's opinion no clear-cut recommendation is evident in this request.
Schee asked if the site parking plan was excessive. The planner replied the
number of spaces proposed is in response to Country Kitchen's standards and
are in excess of city minimums: Dave Gustafson, Country Kitchen International,
stated the restaurant would not locate on this site if the proposed parking
spaces are reduced as spaces are also needed for employees and storage of station
cars. Schee suggested that the spaces for employees and storage be outlined and
located on the eastern side of the site therefore minimizing possible customer
traffic conflicts within-out traffic.
Schee stated she personally feels the Pegasus sign should remain as art of the
site.
Bearman inquired if the request and variances could have been handled by the
Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The planner responded that avenue was dis-
cussed , but it was the staff's advice, and the applicant agreed, to pursue
the PUn route with variances and have the commission make a recommendation to
the council. -
Lynch stated he believes the site is unique and that the parking and signage
problems can be dealt with. He added the site is presently in violation of
city ordinances and the proposed plan is an improvement .
McCulloch felt the variances being requested are major not minor.
yea 7
Unapproved
Planning Commission Minutes May 9, 1977
Sundstrom inquired how many employee and storage spaces would be needed.
Jesse Schwartz Jr., estimated the station would need 3-4 spaces. Gustafson
estimated the restaurant would require 6-8 spaces.
Sundstrom asked if the applicants had contacted Homart in reference to pedestrian
circulation. Mr. Schwartz Jr., replied he has contacted Homart ( Mr. Sahli ), and
no agreement was reached as problems of liability and cost are involved. He pre-
ferred the city install a walk along US 169. The planner stated the staff is
recommending a pedestrian walkway from the MPL site through the Titus property to
the Country Kitchen/Mobil site and access from the EP Center to the site.
Mr. Schwartz Jr., stated such a walkway would be important to their use, but they
do not desire to be tied to an exact location now.
Bearman inquired if the signs could be combined. Mr. Gustafson stated it may be
possible but they do not feel they would be as attractive as the proposed plan.
Mr. Schwartz Jr., stated they would attempt to meet the Sign Ordinance requirements.
Plan;iir.g Commission Minutes -3- May 9, 1977
Motion:
_ 4
Sche moved, Lynch seconded, to recommend approval of the revised site plan for
PUD Concept and Development Stage approval for the Country Kitchen/Mobil Station
restaurant combination contingent upon the staff report dated May 9th , the revised
site plan , and request Country Kitchen/Mobil to outline the parking spaces adjacent
to the eastern entrance to US 169 as employee parking and/or storage not available
to customers and to limit the, Country Kitchen sign to 80 square feet.
Discussion:
Sundstrom stated he would like to see an attempt for joint parking between the
site in question and Homart.
Bearman stated the benefits of having a transition ordinance and a MCA ordinance
are again evident and would be appreciated as quickly as possible in reviewing
requests as this.
Vote:
lotion carried 4:2 with Bearman and McCulloch voting nay.
Bearman voted nay based upon concerns expressed during the meeting.
McCulloch voted nay because he believes , as stated by the applicant, the site
is too small for the uses proposed.
approved
Planning Co;nr.i<<io;i -2- April 2S, 197
V. REPORTS AXD RECO':'•1:XDAT'l0NS
B. Country hilchen/_Mobil Station, by CEDO Builders, request for PUD Concept
and Dceelopmenf Stage approval for the construction of a restaurant/station
combination on 1.7 acres at 8050 Flying Cloud Drive with variances.
The planner referred the commission to the April 25, 1977 letter from Mr. Schwartz
requesting the item be continued to the commission's May 9th meeting to allow more
time to modify the plans.
Motion:
Bearman moved, Redpath seconded, to continue the Country Kitchen/Mobil Station
request to the commission's May 9th meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
i
I
qW9
�. CHARLES NO ,14 A.I.A. ARCHITECT/AN 0X ,
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
IDENTIFICATION & ANALYSIS
FOR
A NEW BUILDING FOR COUNTRY KITCHEN
RESTAURANT & MOBIL SERVICE STATION
OWNERSHIP: 1936 to 1972 the W. Gordon Smith Co. owned the
described site. In 1972, Jessie Schwartz Sr. purchased the W.
Gordon Smith Co. and retained it's name. Country Properties, Inc.,
a subsidiary of Country Kitchen International shall lease the restau-
rant area from W. Gordon Smith Co. The service station shall be owned
and operated by W. Gordon Smith Co.
QCV OP B.: CEDO Builders, Inc., d.b.a./ Country Builders, Inc.,
14750 So. Robert Trail, Rosemount, Minnesota, shall be the developer
and general contractor of this project. Country Builders, Inc.,
was incorporated January 1, 1970. Since that date, we have developed
and built nearly 85% of the Country Kitchen Restaurants through-out
the United States. Country Builders is also experienced in the con-
struction of churches, banks, restaurants, apartments, and service
station, etc.
FISCAL, ECONOMIC: The existing "Wye" Mobil station and cafe
currently serves regular patrons and the community with a limited
potential. This new facility will provide reputable family dining
and experienced mechanical and petroleum service to present customers,
to the adjacent Homart Shopping Center and to the additional motor
traffic resulting from the revamping of S.T.N. No. 169 and W. 78th St.
i
DEVELOPMENT METHOD: Common ingress, egress, parking, landscaping,
and utilities will be proportionately shared by both businesses in
relationship to expenses, maintenance and purpose.
QEVELOp[1ENT TIMING: Construction of new building shall begin
directly after final approval of all required applications and permits.
Construction shall be completed 120 working days after start, with
exception to delays due to highway construction.
CRITICAL PUBLIC DECISIONS: This site, as described on attached
sheets, has been designed and coordinated in conjunction with the
revamping of S.T.N. No. 169 and W. 78th Street.
2900 RICE STREET — SUITE 380 — SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 484.1026
14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL — ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 (612) 423-3036
Page 2
The existing utilities (water, gas, electric, telephone, and
sanitary sewer) will conveniently and adequately serve the operation
of the new facility.
The existing "Pegasus" sign, used as an areal landmark by
Flying Cloud Airport, shall be relocated; and remain on the site as
in the past.
The attached plans are submitted with mention to Zone 1 as
referred to in "Eden Praire Major Center Area" brochure, page 82.
BOUNDARIES d MA UR OWNERSHIPS: Please refer to attached site
plan for boundaries, legal description, adjacent property owners and
highways.
REGIONA __flELALIQRS_HM: One major point to be noted is that
the construction of this building will provide the only family style
dining, automobile service and gasoline station in this particular
region of Eden Praire. This facility will well serve it's community.
EXISTING LAND USE A OCCUPANCY: The existing "Wye" Mobil station
and cafe has been in service to the community since 1936.
EXISTING IRANSP R AI ON SYS7EMS: Currently, the only trans-
portation to this region is automobile and truck traffic.
EXISTING ZONING,: This existing site with it's occupancy is
currently zoned "Highway Commercial".
TOP fRgPHY. SLOPES,: Existing topography and contours shall be I
maintained and altered only when necessary to provide proper drainage
to revamped S.T.H. No. 169 and W. 78th Street.
SOILS: Existing soils are satisfactory for this building con-
struction. !
{
i
VEGETATION: Please refer to the attached landscape plan. R
ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS &fONCLUS.IQN: This new facility Will be of
similar use as the existing building. It will, however, provide
a well designed, expanded modern service to the community.
DEVELOPp1ENT f aILUIYU: The major objective of this project
is to provide Eden Praire with a fine quality family style restaurant
and a modern, well equipped service station.
L1431
Page 3
Existing contours shall remain grading modifications
will be required only to obtain proper drainage and access to revamped
S.T.H. No. 169 and 78th Street.
UTILITY PLAN: Please refer to attached site plan for utility
services and connections.
ZONING riaSSIFICATIONS AND/OR VARIANCES: In order to provide
this facility with adequate parking to serve the -public and to operate
at full capacity, we are requesting a setback variance of 10'-0"
to obtain this required parking.
Both businesses feel an economic necessity in displaying one
business Plyon sign each. We, therefore, request a variance to be
granted allowing one Plyon sign at the entrance side to S.T.H. No. 169
and one sign near the easterly entrance to W. 78th Street Please
refer to landscaping plan for parking lot screening.
�r. Char es Novak
Architect
CN/psb
i
i
I
y�3�
6-1
PN
F�i = � ���i i', IL , i \ail\-� �•���tt .�'i
8 ix
i f p c � ��; r�, • I
_; •r j zit ` ',� .
' �Szii :tt`i Z� 1, 1•�
i fIf �
i
`� �\_
..��_
f r�c'�
",
.�, >
•. .� �
r y�- `.�:
�,
�.--' ;
,�•- \ � r i
r � �
'�% �� � p
�r/ ���yam. --- .
,�! � ANC�.,_ �
\,� �-t- � �
-__, Ib I
�,�n.�,.. \ �.
1�� ��� rl
` ' � s
~ '�, � rid � 1
� �::
�' , I ��
4 i
'V �1
1i ;
� n
I11
cc
F7
1 L'
0 II•'' it�l f� t.� r .
f s f
N �--� � Itfl
Ig
F •j.r
i --
Iv
UL 5
� '/� _~,� r... •.�s j Fes'i�Av `5;.
i
va
lAv
,'� it � �;• } �
1
io
• '�NI^583411fi8�A�1Nf10�1(D`
• 1 i�
�" � iI f � =�l1t•3'�l=
f
a
�lG��
WHP/azd
5/11/77
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 338
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS
COMMISSION AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. III
AS AMENDED.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS•
Section 1. Ordinance No. 111 as amended, is hereby amended
by inserting the following language at the end of the first
sentence:
"and to preserve, protect and improve
family care homes for the mentally
retarded, mentally ill, physically
handicapped, elderly and individuals
needing rehabilitation treatment."
Section 2. Section 4 of ordinance No. 111 is hereby amended
by adding thereto the following:
I
"7. To continue evaluation of city ordinances and
procedures in order to accomodate city group
homes experience.
B. To maintain an up-to-date inventory of home
locations, and possible areas for home locations
that may be available.
9. To oversee the relationship between facilities
and its neighborhood environment, and suggest
and encourage communication between group homes
and the community and initiate if necessary.
10. To review all applications for group homes in
conformance with the requirements of Ordinance
No. 289 as it may be amended, and prepare a
report which details how each home meets City
ordinances and State Law provisions.
41W
WHP/azd
5/11/77
11. To establish liaison with appropriate State
agencies and community groups that provide
services for group home residents or are
involved in their regulation. To act as a
mediator to resolve problems or misunder-
standings between homes and neighbors or
State agencies.
12. To design and implement neighborhood and
community wide education programs to enable
citizens to better understand the needs and
capabilities of group home residents and
enable group home residents to better under-
stand opportunities available to them within
the City.
13. To work with the State and County agencies
involved with deinstitutionalization policies
to give Eden Prairie decision makers correct
anI advanced knowledge of new programs or
regulations.
14. To provide a forum for all citizens to express
ideas concerning the community based services
concept.
15. To design ways that better and more efficient
city/religious/school/civic organizations
services can be utilized by group home residents.
16. To act as a coordinator of all group and foster
homes to maximize their communication enabling
better economic efficiency and program
compatibility. "
i
Section 3. There are added new sections to said ordinance which
shall read as follows:
Section 5. The board shall annually prepare and
present to the City Council a Report in writing of
its activities.
Section 6. This ordinance becomes effective from j
and after its date of passage. ;
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Eden Prairie this day of , 1977, and j
2 - 46,31 a
WHP/azd
5/11/77
finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ,
1977.
Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Published in the on the day of
1977.
i
3 - g6uo
CITY OF EDI'N I'RAII?IE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Resolution No. 77-66
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLLING PLACES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie
that the following places are designated as Polls:
Precinct I King of Glory-Lutheran Church
Precinct II Immanuel Lutheran Church
Precinct III Forest Hills Elementary School
Precinct IV Eden Prairie Methodist Church
Precinct V Eden Prairie Presbyterian Church
Precinct VI South Suburban Hennepin County Vo-Tech
ADOPTED by the City Council on this _ day of 1977.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEAL
ATTEST:
John D. F'rane, City Clerk
CITY OF MEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Resolution No. 77-67
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
the following persons have agreed to serve as election judges and are ? '
appointed for the Fire Bond Referendum, June 14, 1977. *Indicates Precinct
Chairman.
Precinct I. KING OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH
*Loretta Eliason 16920 S. Shore Lane 938-6520
Cheryl Glisczinski 7152 Ticonderoga Trail 933-6348
Rosemary Dysinger 15613 N. Lund Drive 938-4836
Marcie Kehr 15804 S. Eden Drive 938-3755
Bernadette Ploumen 17040 S. Shore Lane 935-0595
Helen Schoeneck 16950 N. Manor Road 933-2129
Precinct II. IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH
*Sue Lane 6961 Alpine Trail 941-1669
Mary Upton 16163 Edenwood Drive 941-2851
Ann Parker 16191 S. Hillcrest Court 941-71G2
Barbara Eigen 7701 Meadow Lane 941-3631
Precinct III. FOREST HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
*Doris Johnson 14315 Crown Drive 941-2039
Claudia Bearman 9955 Valley View Road 941-3189
Fred Holasek 7160 Willow Creek Road 941-4051
Sonja Anderson 14208 Charing Cross 941-3078
Joanne Carlin 6890 Canterbury Lane 941-6690
Jean Tangen 7032 Willow Creek Road 941-5299
Precinct IV. EDEN PRAIRIE METHODIST CHURCH
*Genevieve Gibson 15737 Cedar Ridge Road 941-1624
Sharon Levitt 8406 Hiawatha Ave. 944-1300
Shirley Jellison 9560 Highview Drive 445-2650
Evelyn Rogers 9100 Eden Prairie Road 941-4776
Virginia Gartner 15701 Cedar Ridge Road 941-1803
Margie Woodhouse 9520 Lakeland Circle 445-1428
Precinct V. EDEN PRAIRIE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
*Sharon Lynch 11426 Leona Road 941-2792
Norman Brown 14318 Fairway Drive 941-6632
Barbara Vanderploeg 8735 Leeward Circle 941-5363
Mildred Clark 8779 Basswood Drive 941-3269
LILY
Resolution No. 77-67
Page 2 (con't)
Precinct VI, SOUTH SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY VO-TECH
*Edna 11olmgren 8952 C Neill Lake Road 941-6479
Virginia Schmitz 11555 Sunnybrook Road 941-2359
Sally Brown 10080 Bennett Place 941-1532
Jean Reichow 10501 Pioneer Trail 941-4054
ADOPTED by the City Council this day of , 1977.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEAL
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
�IG�{3
whp/Jh 5/11/77
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-72
A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY PROHIBITING THE
BRINGING IN AND INSTALLING AS RESIDENCES MOBILE
HOMES WITHIN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE.
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie is in the process of updating its
comprehensive guide plan; and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that said report on said update shall
be presented to the City Council within nine (9) months from the date
hereof; and
WHEREAS, one of the factors being considered in said comprehensive
guide plan is the regulating of the placement of mobile homes within the
City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie that pending the receipt and adoption of an update of the
comprehensive guide plan, no person, firm or corporation shall be entitled
to receive a permit to move in or install a mobile home upon any land in
the City without having received a permit therefor with unanimous approval
of the City Council.
For purposes of this resolution, a mobile home is as defined in
Minnesota Statutes 327.31 Subd. 6.
ADOPTED by the City of Eden Prairie this ,_ day of , 1977.
Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Shah
a
r W D o cb M m 0
(l r d V1 a V1 C
00 n tr sY j
CL A �+o C6 c n G.
ID F �• m fD m
•7 DF (D (( S £ O N tA•h
w •to O J a d O 0 •V O <(D0 O 3 1 0 n a ^{ 0 to tD
•O N (7 Cc-�• a A O (D ro h n N
O �•n :0 A ro
t0 00 o = to roS C IUD n -�'• 'rot w y
N c 0 7 O Oa in 0, m ro in.(D a 0' N -h (+ O to A e+ CDno m n a ro
-..-S 2-
�m a °`� ci m o a
ro 3 Y m A Cd (+ 7
A a G m O To to _
r+ m a o a sw m a v ro c
o m to n G A IA (T n
m N (D (D ro a
m ro N C w a 00
rT -h G
S 0 m c+ Oe Z
A to H
N N 7 r
v �gp n
Q (2. m h D
_ y
o c� a
C C
ro A OD
C..
-• m
1
m
y
T
O
CT C O O S t•+o C O S
C n7 �ro a 0 I nt7 C V
c+ro A nY- A m(D V
ro A A n
O m m
C) N 1 —•n CT 00
CL0P (Dm `�a 7a ro � .
N �.g 4. 1 O.
A D o y, ro
o ao e+
N A 00 m O J w n 7
(D d tY 0 a to 7
Z �.r+ �V
a A O (D Ph w
c+O m % + a
33 N 6
0 ro X
m•J• 00 O a v
o
0 ((DD ((DD a -+ N S
O G N N (Ar+ -�.ro C Ph N
n O F ro (D O
N C
ro tit
m c F m 4�
c (p C C
a 1 ct° 0. G.
m w (D
IV
0 m .+ v
3 n a,
ro tom '+
m A O ( m
m Og 4n O (f ro
nm
+ m ww e+
m n h
(D A
ro 'r
m
n
0 0
• a c
N A
to
op �4 rn cn s+ w Or- 0 as m o a
a 0 a
a J a 0 .+ N
ro -S A up a N < O $ a fl°
j t+ fp 7 X 7 X N m =w m N ( m
A ro 1+ m a _ A 9 mm ro a 0 J ro O
3 S 3 su ro O ro a O 3. ro ro Y�� O N cr
w w N 3 N 3 � N.. a 'S 7 N C w
3 m_ A A 'S o o A n A 7 A
O j 0 0
ro w ro m
A tG �'•7 'S t+ 'S O - m t0�C 9
3 7 O N O
m
7 r 0!� N O_ 'S t N <
t0 O IA ; = A N N Z A N m
to 0. fp fD J < c+ �. 7 �.w J W to
10 CD -�+ N �7roS O c1 N 7 lu
• 10 ♦n '4
o m .+w co 1+ OT <
< ro n Y C+ N w�O 7 a N J
X I W m < w
7 a 0a•�+• N to3 v
C+ *0 a ro N 7 m O. m
C+ t0 7 0. 3 V
O O K a 0 (•0 7
w O -S N -1 N '1 O
fD IN 3 a O
I- . O t*
C+ m c
m ro
o a
(Imi N 0 3
N ro O t0
0*0 3 ro
7 O A
l7IW
m N 7
7 Q N
A
N r•
ro
c � �
o m
tom !
o'` 1
= ro m
ID d
r a -4
N 3E ro
C S m O
I
ro S X j
m .+
p�^ppy
p6 tC
c C
N
d
J
�h%
o O
2.
,C yr C
_
N
m Q°
= O
CL
m
O� VI A W N ;.' � �►a m O � � N '
O M y
v o <
h �� :E
c m s J a< m
Nac++ n O
0 a 'v y= _0<K
n 000 a
;o o mn s
m
a ao a Om v<i
° a a v= nn m C 0
_ J m j a n w •Oa Y aK
N O ' 'rn O m h0 '*
'O Nm 'Y .<.. K O
O -z < h n K V
�r K O a E fin.. V
n a < O a V
7 m OA n 00
m a n fD O
s a �. m -+,
0
m
fi m
o � _
n �
'Y
m a
N
K
m
1
1 1 1 1 1 1
-zv J•san via crn mND rraD rrm0 �.G0
m s m = o xm � ia-.0
'some = wc
my o rr= wn�
c o rs v 'o •s E2.
n O -r
m N o
CL s a owE 0 = - +oJ a S
pC o
c Cc, 9Oc+ mCL
n A W C fm+N = Wm = m c+mn n d Cf
a 0 OOIT-• V n 0 ��N
h•S OO• n m ON 0.0 N tnN -A
m c m as Off, N 1�V] A Y
so o *w a= a c O 5
a m Oo
cam a - n *n OK p J. 1 a 'mil � N
T<1+O'Oil Cl NOO m ti'O M JvPt�•S a amah nrofp v
a -+,mv J� Om
O v0m n O
n N ` m = O M
9 �
= O =m
10'A n CCl
7 = �cu1 cNa-O.Cma.+h �� .+rhry
o O a "a= aro on am
io0 ar. o <o
vo
x N rr wa a N s a hum+ my
n 3 �m oN No
m a m m m X x A n S S
--•cr e+Bo m = J � 03 0m N
h `° cs a wa w �:m ' s m I
n V 3 c+a
3
N C) •S m 0 J.D
c+a N
x c+-+ -n o• m v�' N W
n CL N m a - <S' m
N -A 70 c+ K Cr N O C
m y y N A e+ CO
yKa << mc0 d co
= m Y 7
'0
3
� n
i c m
aD m a n
j to n w
a m j 0 < ae
0
a co t
T o m I.
= r m n
c � a a �
o m
o -1 w
m p7p W O
O OS < �_
O m 7
V! m V
V
O
7
3
V
1
O
7
A
a
c->
m
O
e+
v
W
m
T
O
C
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services R.—J.
SUBJECT: Municipal Liquor Store
DATE: May 5, 1977
In an attempt to provide comparative information for Leasing vs. Owning
we've developed the following:
CAPITAL COSTS
LEASE OWN
Fixtures and Equipment $45,000 $45,000
Inventory 40,000 40,000
Building/Land/Improvements 1S5,000
85,000 $240,000
ANNUAL STATEMENT
Total Sales $400,000 $400,000
Cost of Sales (79%) 316,000 316,000
Gross Profit (21%) $ 84,000 84,000
Operating Expense $ S1,000 $ 52,000
33,000 32,000
Lease Payments $ 17,200 --------
Net Profit 15,800 $ 32,000
Debt Service 20,7001 31,7002
Net Cash Flow ( 4,900) $ 300
1 First 5 years only.
2 First S years only, for years 6-30 amount is $11,000 for Building/Land.
If area leased were 3,300 sq. ft. then the lst year lease payment would
equal $13,200 as opposed to $17,200 shown. Net profit would then be
$19,800 and Net Cash Flow ($900).
-2-
Assuming lower sales we've also compared:
$350,000 Annual Sales $300,000 Annual Sales
Lease Own Lease Own
Total Sales $3SO,000 $350,000 $300,000 $300,000
Cost of Sales 276,500 276,500 237,000 237,000
Gross Profit 33,500 73,500 $ 63,000 $ 63,000
Operating Expense S1,000 52,000 51,000 S2,000
$ 22,500 $ 21,S00 $ 12,000 $ 11,000
Lease Payment 17,200 ----- 17,200 -------
$ 5,300 $21,S00 ( $5,200) $ 11,000
Debt Service 20,700 31,700 20,700 31,700
Net Cash Flow ($ 15,400) ( 10,200) ($25,900) ( 20,700)
Again the debt service entries are for lst 5 years only with the amount
for owning reducing to $11,000 for years 6-30. No debt service costs are
incurred under the lease option after five years.
Under the OWN OPTION the following debt service costs are incurred:
30 year Financing: - ($11,000/yr.)
Land and Improvements
Building
5 year Financier - ($20,700/yr. for the first 5 years)
Inventory
Fixtures and Equipment
Under the LEASE OPTION everything is on the 5 year certificate financing plan:
($20,700/yr. for first 5 years)
Inventory
Fixtures and Equipment
Footnote:
( ) Deficit
UV;U
DIRLAM PROPERTIES
15241 Creekside Court 17J7
Eden Prairie, MN 55343 7
May 6, 1977
Mr. Roger Ulstad
8950 Eden Prairie Rd.
Eden Prairie. MN 55343
RE: Walnut Addition
Dear Mr. Ulstad:
I am re—submitting the plat for the Walnut Addition to the planning
commission on May 23. 1977. The only difference in the project is
the change in zoning from R 6.5 and R 13.5 to all R 13.5, otherwise
the plat is the same as previously approved.
I therefore, respectfully request that a public hearing be held
before the city council on June 7, 1977.
Sinceroly,
2
Deh9' p-xn�irlam
DIRLAM PROPERTIES
DPD/mp
qU 51
MEMOR&NDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager tt
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services l
RE: Roomer Land
DATE: May 13, 1977
As directed at the May 5 continued meeting, I've discussed this further
with Mr. Boomer. He is agreeable to the following purchase terms:
1. Price $663/acre x 8 acres (7.93 is exact acreage from tax book).
This is the price paid for the Lund Property - I believe Boomer's
land is "better".
2. Boomer will pay 1976 taxes which are delinquent ($180 plus penalty
and interest) and 1977 taxes ($200).
3. Payment schedule, cash ($5,304) at time of closing (about June
15, 1977).
I've talked to representatives from the Riley/Purgatory watershed District
about a cooperative project. I believe they would fund 50% ($2,652) of
the purchase price as they did for the Lund property.
Attached is a map showing the Lund and Boomer Property.
i
I
AIL 5�.
r/
_ .ass:.z_ ..__.���� •.i?'�"�__JI�4,1 w�a� L. �` �� •�
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services J,
RE: Gorra House at Anderson Lakes park
DATE: May 13, 1977
Mr.Gorra, under the terms of our acquisition thru condemnation, had
3 years occupancy at the home at 8980 County Road 18. The three years
has expired and he has advised that he intends to vacate the premises
on July 1, 1977.
We've requested park development funding from the Metro Council for 1979 -
thus nearly 2 years of interim use is available.
We feel the house could rent for $1,000`-/month and suggest we advertize
and try to rent the house until May 1, 1979.
1
..L.0�;��`.�s' Lilr.r L L.�wr L..C�u �.sC-L_�'• TEIEPi-iJ:<E: 6 6 1-i 2 5's
SE04\'JENTIV,101TH AV-.UE
f CESlOEI:TIAL - COMMERCIAL - BUILDING CONTRACTOP.S MINNEAPOLIS, M.N. 5 5 4 19
OF a.
/1
YVII o
lt,--aj t-
6
C4) -75W9
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services
RE: Tree Subsidy Program
DATE: May 13, 1977
The State check for $53,100 for the City's retroactive 1976 Tree Subsidy
has been received- The amount is based on:
Payments to property owners (Direct Subsidy)
Out of pocket City costs (Indirect Subsidy)
The payments to property owners amount is/was based on $50 per tree
for residential property, $25 per tree for non-residential property
and $15 per tree for burning. Actual subsidies will be less than
estimated because of the sliding scale subsidy. We've asked property
owners to tell us how many trees of what size were removed in 1976.
As these subsidy forms are returned we're drawing the subsidy checks
for payment---provided the owner has fully complied with the program.
The State Department of Agriculture rejected some of our subsidy bill'
because the), were "non-residential" properties. We used the broadest
definition of "residential" for purposes of our billing in an attempt :.
comply with the Council's stated policies. Thus only expressly non-
residential properties--businesses and cemeteries were deleted from our
billing list to the State. We now have 2 choices:
Subsidize these property owners out of local funds.
i
. Not subsidize these properties. i
I
�(�5(0
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: May 12, 1977
SUEOFCT: Preliminary Report
Sewer and Water Lateral Costs
Edenview I, Kutcher's First and Kurtz Lane
I.C. 51-300
The preliminary results of the feasibility study by RCM Associates for
the above referenced improvements indicates the following estimated costs:
Edenview I and Kutcher's 1st Add.
$2,760 per lot for sanitary sewer
1,530 watermain
1,670 restoration
5,960
1,000 (25% credit)
4,960
520 Trunk charge
$5,480 Per lot total
$602,200 Total project cost
40,000 Minnetonka Connection charges
642,200
515,120 Less 94 lots @ 5,480
$127,000 City share
Kurtz Lane
$2,390 Per lct for sanitary sewer
1,530 watermain
1,160 restoration
5,080
1,000 (25% credit)
4,080
520 Trunk charge
$4,600 Per lot total
$167,500 Total project cost
142,600 Less 31 lots @ 4,600
$ 24,900
The relatively high cost for the Edenview and Kutcher areas is due in part
to the lack of assessable lots on the north !•ide of Townline Road and the
2 -
east side of County Road 4. Also, the restoration costs are somewhat high
in the Evenview Area. The council may wish to consider some form of sub-
sidy in order to balance the assessment rates between the two projects.
With the Council's approval, it it our intent to notify all property own-
ers involved as to the estimated costs and ask if they would still desire
a public hearing before the Council. We will report the results back to
the Council together with a formal feasibility study at the June 14 Council
meeting.
CJJ:kh
1
f• ,W
1 to
cw(f.
, °�C �: `F ! i a^ 1• • �f''r••• J`' nria:<.l,fer R...H /
v 6 '
•-� - -. � �' - i Carl
' b
— 8"SAN SEWER40
• sou7M Iu4D a0AD vv• J f (f
46
10
• 6 -y w{
• � w
Y
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Julie, City Engineer
SUBJECT: GARRISON FOREST
PROPOSAL: The Preserve is requesting City Council approval of the Final
Plat of "Garrison Forest." This is a 51 lot single family residen-
tial plat (R1-13.5) located north of Prairie East Second Addition
and east of Amsden Hills Addition in Section 24.
HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved on March 1, 1977 per Council
Resolution 077-26.
Zoning to RI-)3.5 was finally read and approved on April 5, 1977,
per city Council Ordinance #77-11.
The Final Plat now submitted for approval conforms with the approved
Preliminary Plat.
VARIANCES: The Standard P.U.D. setback variances from Ordinance No. 135
shall apply.
Variance from Ordinance No. 135, requiring 13,500 square foot minimum
lot size and 2 units per acre maximum density, is also required.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer,
concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing and street signs will
be installed throughout the development in accordance with City Stan-
dards.
A 6' bituminous walkway will be installed through Outlet C. This will
connect with the Prairie East Second Addition to the south and the
Preserve recreation area between Amsden Hills and this plat. Owner-
ship and maintenance will be by The Preserve Homeowners Association.
Street lighting will be installed upon the request of the developer
or homeowners. It is proposed that such lighting costs will be billed
to each homeowner in the subdivision in conjunction with the sewer
and water billings (estimate $1.50 per month).
PARK DEDICATION: A cash contribution of $14,025 or $275 per lot, as required
in Ordinance No. 332, will be required of this plat. This fee will be
collected upon issuance of building permits.
2 -
Outlot A shall not be further subdivided until sewer and water
service are available through property to the north.
Outlots B and C will be used for pathway purposes with ownership and
maintenance by the Preserve Homeowners Association.
BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit approved by the City
Attorney shall be posted in an amount approved by the City Engineer
to cover the cost of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, roadways,
street signs and walkways within the plat. A two year warranty per-
iod will be required for these utilities.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Final Plat of "Garrison Forest"
subject to the requirements of this report and the following:
1. Execution of the "Developers Agreement."
2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in
the amount of $1500.
3. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
4. Receipt of petition for street lighting improvements.
CJJ:kh
May 17, 1977
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-69
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
OF GARRISON FOREST
WHEREAS, the Plat of Garrison Forest has been submitted in a
manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code
and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have
been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and ordinances of the City of Eden Priarie..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Garrison Forest is approved upon com-
pliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report
on this plat dated May 12, 1977.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy
of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds and/or
Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358,
Subd. 3.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above
named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
Wolfgang H. penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: Ste'
1
John Frane, Clerk
�IG��
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: May 12, 1977
SUBJECT: Authorization for Bids
Paving Machine and Roller
We are requesting Council authorization to advertise for bids for a
tailgate type bituminous paving machine at an estimated cost of
$12,000 and a 3 to 5 ton static roller at $8,000. These items are
included in the 1977 Capital Improvements Budget. We propose to
receive bids on June 10 for consideration by the Council at your
June 21 meeting.
CJJ:kh
i
i
i
�Ibl�3
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jim Jensen, Planning Assistant
1l1ROUGH: Dick Putnam, Planning Director
DATE: May 3, 1977
PRO.iFC'r: Hipps Mitchell Heights Third Addition
APPLICANT: Hipps Construction
LOCATION: 7.8 acres located on Outlots A and E,
Southwest corner of Mitchell Road and Scenic
Heights Road
REQUEST: Preliminary plat approval for 16 duplex units
on 32 lots.
REFER TO: 1. Mitchell Heights PUD and rezoning information
2. Hipps Mitchell Heights Outlet B Duplex application
3. Hipps Mitchell Heights Third Addition application
BACKGROUND
This Parcel of land is located on outlets A and F, of PUD 72-05 and is
currently zoned RIM 6.5 . Platting has been previously approved for phase 1
townhouse and single family development.within the 34 acre planned unit
development.
The proponent , in Feb.'77,requestad pre]iminary plat approval for duplexes
on Outlot B ( zoned RM 6.5 ) south of the existing townhouses. The Planning
Commission recommended denial of the request and the request was never
taken to the city council.
SITE PL.tiN ANALYSIS
Al] lots meet the lot size requirement of zoning District PM 6.5. Although
several lots have a back lot width of between 20-30 feet which limits activity
and usefulness of these lots. The staff is suggesting the developer consider
an alternative to increase the usefulness of the lots with limited width.
The original master plan submitted with the PUD shows a play area incorporated
into a townhouse project. Figure 1 illustrates an alternate use as a
common play/open space which may increase the usability of the area rather
than 20-30 foot rear lots.
The developer should give the common area or deed restriction/covenant
idea some consideration; rear yards 25 feet deep are of little practical
use if developed individually.
i
Access / Circulation
Access to the site is gained through Scenic Heights Road, Mitchell road or
Tamarack Trail. 'rile main access to TH 5 and Co. Rd. 4 are through Mitchell
Road and Scenic Heights Road respectively. A future interchange with new
212 may occur at Mitchell Road north of the site.
Staff Report-Hipps Outlets A$E -2- May 3, 1977
Soils, Topography, Grading
The soils on the site are of the Esterville Series. They are well drained
sandy soils underlain by sand and gravel. These soils have a good bearing
capacity for foundations and are generally well suited for residential
development. The soils are quite erosive , but because of the moderate
slopes on the site the potential for severe erosion is slight.
Vegetation is difficult to establish and maintain on these soils.
Frequent watering and fertilizing is necessary to maintain a good lawn.
The staff suggests that 4-6" of topsoil be graded over the top of existing
soils for ease of establishment and maintenance of vegetation.
Ve eetation
The site is devoid of any major vegetation. Suggested trees for planting
on the site include white pine, white spruce, red pine,red cedar, cotton-
wood, sliver maple and black walnut
Pedestrian Circulation
A trail system is proposed along Scenic Heights Road in conjunction with the
road improvements planned for 1977or1978. The staff feels that a trail system
would provide access to the public area just south of the proposed site. The
staff feels that this trail system should be constructed as a sidewalk either
of concrete or asphalt. Also, the staff recommends either a grass/limestone
trail system through a to foot easement behind all lots or a sidewalk along
Tamarack Trail]. This would provide residents with access to the neighborhood
park to the south. A voluntary homeowner's association may be organized for
maintenance of the common area/totlot area.
Staff Report-Hipps Outlots A6E -3- May 3, 1977
FIGURE I
xf?.:1G riF.1GHl�� F..^aa7 '
! l
J � p
�ti
QI
><
X7
NV
ilw�
� �Qe�i
Staff Report-Hipps Outlots ME -4- May 3, 1977
FIGURE 2
1
TO
rw 5
scF�.ltc, r+�+•
TKW
A17Drtto�
_ fnrtu�
. sm, a�
SYSTra� i
Ul
Staff Report-Hipps Outlots AGE -5- May 3, 1977
RECOMMENDATIONS
The planning staff would recommend approval of the Hipps Third Addition
as follows:
1. Approval of the preliminary plat of Hipps Mitchell Heights
Third Addition ( Outlots A $ E ) contingent upon the
following conditions:
a. The developer consider an alternative that allows
the center of proposed site to be used for a common
open area.
b. A trail system be provided along Tamarack Trail or
the rear lot areas and Mitchell Road.' These trails
could be constructed much like a sidewalk either
concrete or asphalt.
DP:jj
I
Unapproved
Planning Commission Minutes -3- May 9, 1977
B. Guide Plan Update.
Item moved to end of Petitions and Requests.
V. PETITIONS AND REQUESTS
A. Hipps Mitchell Heights Third Addition, request for preliminary plat approval
for (1t�tlot A Mitchell Heights Addition and Outlot E MitcheIl Heights 2nd
Addition for 32 duplexes on 16 lots. The site is located on 7.8 acres west
of Mitchell Road and east and north of Tamarack Trail. A public hearing.
Mr. Doug Goriesky, engineer, outlined the location of the plat and stated minor
difficulties have been encountered in utility service because the lots are very deep.
He stated the city staff is recommending a common space in the center and a water-
main Ioop through the project.
The planner referred the commission to the May 3rd staff report outlining the staff's
concerns of the need for a trail system along Tamarack Trail and Mitchell and a
common open space in the center of the plat.
Lynch asked who world manage the common space. The planner believed a volunteer
w homeoner's association or some other arrangement could be investigated. Mr.
Goriesky agreed with the planner and asked the commission to approve the plat
and allow the: proponent and staff to work out the common space management prior
to council review.
Bearman inquired if the lots meet the minimum front setback of 90' in RM 6.5
Districts. The planner replied each unit is 45' back making two units a total
of 90', therefore meeting the ordinance.
Bearman asked if individuals would be able to buy single units or double units and
if legal problems are anticipated. The planner stated singles or doubles could be
bought and the party wall agreement is a fairly common legal document.
Sundstrom asked if anyone in the audience had any questions or comments.
None were raised. i
Motion 1:
Lynch moved, Bearman seconded, to close the public hearing on the Mitchell
Heights Third Addition preliminary plat . Motion carried unanimously.
Motion 2:
Lynch_moved, Bearman seconded, to recommend approval of the Hipps MitcheIl Heights
Third Addition preliminary plat contingent on the May 3, 1977 staff report and:
a. That the developer consider an alternative that allows the
center of the proposed site to be used for a common j
open area.
b. That a trail system be provided along Tamarack Trail or the
rear lot areas and Mitchell Road. These trails could be i
constructed much like a sidewalk either concrete or asphalt.
c. That the plat be contingent upon the Engineer's report of
May 5, 1977.
d. Insure that the open space delineation does not bring any
of the lots below the district minimum.
Vore: ',rion _arried unanimously. y
CITY Ol'' RDeN PRAIRIE
CIIJ:CX LIST YOJI RJ-.VJ1a1JNG 11JbPO.-ED
LAND DeV1aAPMEN'I's
DATI3: 5/5/77
DJ:•VJr.1.OPl^!;!!•J': Hipps-Mitchell Heights Third Add. L.D. NO. _77-P-12 -
WCATJn;: 7.8 Acres-west of Mitchell Rd., east and north of Tamarack Trail
J21)'1•:PS:N_!i P.U.11, OR PPO-Y'VIOR
YURING Mitchell Heights P.U.D. RES. il. 547
DRV!iJ,011rit: - Mr. Richard Hipps ----� --, -----__--
f:NGJJa1i1iR/;;,i•!;:iU.t; Minnesota Valley Engineers ^-
DOCUMUNr£ SU!°lJ:";:•1'D YOR 1t1:V1.8'v;; Preliminary Plat of Hipps Mitchell Heights -
Third Addition
PROP0,N1,: -_ The developer is requesting Preliminary-Plat approval of
v 32 lots for the construction of 16 double unit buildings_
1. L;;rd Dcvoloproc,i;t 'llicati.or. file•:cl ar•c: filing fec & deposit pai.t,• yes _
Cony of a}>hli.cc•t�-oii furwr.rdrd to {9atcrsh::d D.isa;rict yes -- --
2. l'rocet.o it 1
(5/9/77
a. Pl;lr,ni.ug & ",onirq Coiwnission I'zeliminin-y ---
b. Park & Jcecrcatio!
c. Ilum..n Hi.r;hts co:cmA!:s.ion
d. rl.an:i reel C.c::nui o;,i on PaW—C! Ur'). _----
a.
Y. Y!;ilc•r.Lrci r1.is.cc:ict - ----- -- ___ —
3. Ty1n: c!: Dov, ; ;•::;n` ---Double-unit residential (1tM 6.5)_��� _
4. i+npjc•t :-tat.csnew, roqu-fired l,ur linviron:nu 11.11
lnii•ac:c. 1`ul i.cy Act. ol- 1913;
No
— 2 —
5. Present Zoning RM 6_5
6. Proposed Zoning _TSame
Consi.st(!nt with approval P.U.D. or Comp Plan? Yes
List var.inucc:; required & setbacks that apply: None regnested
7. Project hrua 7.8 Acres Density 4.4 Units yer acre
C. P(;bl is 01,en sp:xcc jcud/oJ: cash dcd.i cation Cash dedication $2000 per unit required
Private open :;pace Refer. to 5/3/77 Flamii.n( Staff Report_
frail systc:ns 6 sidc,walCs Refer to 5/3/77 Planning staff Report
Range of lot sir_cs _ 6,525 S�PTto 11,960 SF
9. Prclimiue:ry 13uilding Plans Not submitted
10. P.c;•rc:acnt.:;tivr. Soil. 13ol'ing;: u Not Submitted .-______�_
ll., 9trcot. ,;Yft(.m
A. 7,cces,s to ad oiniu:; prolx'rties Adjoining properties served with
existing roadways
R/y; Roadwa (Ilacl; t:o 1L_c1: of Cnrb)
Pr1Val 1
drlv(`l-"Y:!, 1)(' 24
rarlci(iq ----- Post no parking signs
Leadi-u,i t-o ('ul Oo :;acs 50 28.�
i
(not over )001') 1:
minor rr:;iclonlia7. - i
i
Cul do :;res 100 78 (no island) j
120 9E1 (w.iE.h island) �_
Thru 1::•:;i,lcntial (collector:) 1
s Col do :;:(c::
over 1000' Gp 32
Accc-s to units as proposed would be from existing roadways. RccOmnend "tee"
driveways to serve units fronting on Scenic licight. Road and Mitchell road.
Final surfacing of 'Tamarack Trail will be required. `
1
1
I
3 -
MSA 70 44
Parkway 100 28 divided
Fire Road 12
Pathways 12 6
siract. grade -m:rx. 7.56, min. .59
Concrete curb & quiter required,
Deep strength asphalt dcc;.ign
C. Check City'.. cc,,npr,l i:naivr. street sy"tem.
Ik veloper bui.ld:: 112 of pal kcaays at his cost, & R/V dedication --N./A--
D. Strcet t1:,mes - try to conform with existing in the area. Avoid additional
names on sill de sac:: having ci.ght or less lota.
Check l.is,t. of existing street name,. __—(Eygtirlg�sl
E. Privat.o parkin.> lots--L6-12 cone c&C, and full depth asph. design
N.A.
F. str(mcL Sign::-L'cveloi,c? or City installs Developer purchase - City installs
12. Parhinn: (S(w Ord. (IM) O.K. _
13. Utility Sy:.ccmr;; Service to units fronting on Tamarack Trail will, require
open cutting of Tamarack. Service to other units from extension
A. Sanitary ScWOr of existing utilities
1. Sccvice Detail 4" minimum - one required for each living unit
2. L�erv.ixc! to adjoining proporty O.K.
Service to units fronting on Tamarack Trail will require open
P. t;atcru•. n: -_cutting_of Tamarack. Service to other units fzom extension of
existing ut.i.li.l.i.es _ ..
1. sheets .'.iei\,ic, Dc::ign (.2.0 psi. at higlwst. fixtur(l) - 0.1,• _
2. liydraul. 7ocnt_ion-i'i.re Nrapcctor to review
3. Valvinq Roview }ending final design _
4. Cempli.nce cuit.h fire code _ Fire inspector to review
5. Service to adj'"'-t. properly
4 -
c. Storm Sewer & Grading
1. Sediment control. plan As required by Purgatory Creek Watershed Dist.
2. SkimiNg & grit control for conunercial parking lots N.A.
3. pos.itive (jjjtl,.-t for drainage I-,onds Required
4. Avoid c>j(,,Or;!;jve grading and tree removal Required
5. Arrows !0jowing dr,iimiqc Submitted
Accomodizko dyaina(Ic, fr(,,n adjacent properties Required
G. Dcjjote dr..iiciule area for individual inlets and projected high watOr
for poml!i Required
7. yec.,p (,.)-jjjjjjjj,u in gutters, not in centor of street Required
soci drj;jj,;:rj, swalos and steel) V-101es Required
9. Flood None
10. Vatvl!:hed District approval Required
11. MT, q,p)"Val N.A.__
D. Natural Gim, & 11,0cphone underground rcqidred
T,3(,c,,jc Required
14. IJ(jhk,�; c. ()II-site IJjhting to be installed upon request from developer or
----jj&i6&wners
15. to be stI1,111itj-cd 1,o mg) or Henn. Co.
X j.f abutting a
Stotk- or County IL,,\
N.T.
36. )A-sA levioTl and] VIOMIXI)II Levipd:#_5027 trunk.sew/wat. .
�7,31(',25�_
_J .�cnq nd c9nid-Alts. STr, $14.382; 51-271
S,I,m swiz, $638.
recit,ji-i Nojunj sr,_rezoned).�
Vllu A1),*-I):,Ic( J'c,y review Not required
Party wall a,jrvements to be required at buildinq Permit tin'O- The
agreement !-,jjoIIld al,;o cover driveway maintenance.
MINNESOTA VALLEY
SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS CORP.
P�
12006 12TH AVEt:UE SOUTH BURNSYILLE,f�INNESOTA 55337
Phone: 890.7750
April 29, 1977
Nr. Richard Putnam
Cit,• Pic-'ncr
City of Edcn prairie
7801 NiCcl:cl'_ Road
Eden Prcfric, Mirnesota 55343
icar 1vr. Put:-cm:
Enclesed is e r letter of February 25, 1977. That letter adeGnately
definos tho intent and essence of our prcccmt proposal vith only
minor variaticns.
Onc important eiffcrcrce with this proposal is the ability to set the
duelling units, fr.rthcr beet: from N-Itchcll Read. This will aid in
Ee^^.nrati_G tl:c d:.cllirgs from £^,• future ecveree effects of the road.
The larger let 2e^,thE £1EC £llc-s the developer the ability to grant
a large ccsc=nt over the cater mein and leave this utility readily
acecssab'_e, and easy to mcintain.
Sincerely,
MINYE1 0"i'A VALLEY S1MVEY0S & EFOINEtRS CORP.
Gardcl L. Ctiriste•:son, President
I
GLC/gm
encl.
i
MINNESOTA VALLEY
SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS CORP.
', !v 12005 12TN AVENUE SOUTH BURNSVILLE,MINNESOTA 55337
Phone: 890.7750
February 25, 1977
Mr. Richard Putnam
City Planner
City of rdcn Prairie
7801 liitchcll Rccd
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
RE: Proposed P.U.D. clionge for Hipp's Mitchell heights.
Dear Mr. Putnam:
The proposed alterLtion of this section of the original P.U.D. is pro=ted
by a ca_1:cd sh_ft in m..erEct interest in double duellingn. Thin usenge
change from the original P.U.D. is, in our opinion, only a miner adjustment
from our original intentions. Development intensity is reduced from cur
original subm-ittc"_ oral tho structures can utilize the site caithc•-t unusual
gradirg of rny 1:ine. T!ic site in its natural state contains no a^znitics
that would rar_ant rresc:caticn techniques , therefore we propose a ccc7lete
regrading erd replcntin; of trees end shrubbery in line with present city i
policies. Since the structures will be clustered into a small circle, we
have nct p:c lecd any pedestrian wcys or recreational areas or. the site, but
instead will rely on the original P.U.D. areas as intended.
All buildings are designed at a minimum of 1 foot above the roadway grade
and nll of the driveways are gently sloping to eccomodate off street parking.
i
The utility systems hnve previously been sized to handle mere units than
are near proposed, therefore no capacity problems are cntieipnted. Utility
depths and slopes are conventional and no unusual construction methods are
anticipr.ted. Each building will have two sets of utility services. The
structures are intended to be split-entry conventional, with front facing
entrances and garage doors. The buildings will have slightly different
exterior treatments but will be similar to all the others in basic layout.
The site fins been designed to convey all surface waters within the boundary
lines and will routo additional run off, from the existing single family '
lots, to the 41cct and the tcwnshnuse units, to the North of this dcvclormcnt,
to Tamarac Trail.
q0 s
February 25, 1977
Mr. Richard Putnam
Page 2
As for the platting of the site, the lot layout has been designed to
allow separate ownership of each living unit with a common wall being
located on the property line. This would be handled with a normal party
wall agreement. The placement of the buildings on the lots are designed
to meet the minimum 30 foot set back and maintain a minimum 15 foot side
yard distance on both ends of each double unit. The lots have a minimum
area of 6,5C0 square feet, so each double unit sits on two lots with a
minimum area of 13,000 square feet, which meets the city code.
The only deviction from the city code in double units, is that of the 90
foot miniurim frontage requirement. It is our feeling that with this type
of plotting, end with the placement of the building on a common lot line,
along -with: maintaining a 15 foot side yard at the end of each double unit,
that tho Q foot minimum frontage does not become relevant to this type
of devclepcont. Each unit is 26 foot in width, (from the center of the
party wcl'_ to the c::tremities of the building), allowing for a 15 foot
side yard distance, the minimum frontage at the set bact: line within this
development would then be 41 feet, or doubled for the two lots (62 feet),
except at the corner lots where a 30 foot set back has been provided from
both streets.
The price range that each living unit -will fall in, will be in the $40,000
bracket. This -.ill include all development costs and a wide range of
options for interior and ew_terior treatments. We anticipate that all of
the homes -will be sold and constructed this sure-er and it is our intention
to begin construction at the earliest possible time.
Any questions that you, or the other members of the staff, might have
regarding this development =y be directed to either Gordon Christenson,
of Minnesota Valley Surveyors & Engineers, or Mr. Hipp of Hipp Construction.
Sincerely
M10ESiTA VALLEY SURVEYOnS & ENGINEERS CORP.
,;/Gordon L. Christenson, President
GLC/gm
y(11
PHASE 9 i4
,jLr----
,;11'f AREA
_iJ IL 'I
'•1—v1..,. � ,�C ±�'1f� �/" tom '• ,
t
tl U 1 J p c:,'J U as approved
MITCH.ELL HEIGHTS P.U.D,
EDEN Y1LIIRIE, 111N%IESOTA
HIPP'S CO:vSTRVCTI011 CO. MINNESOTA VALLEY SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS CORP.
M10'UrCLIS, MIPNIESOTA BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA
\ / { a
� s
rT
41
Proposed Revision
Mitchell Heights P,U,D.
Eden Prarie, Minnesota
t
I
V Hipp's Construction Company
Minneapolis, Minnesota Minnesota Valley Surveyors &
Engineers Corp.
Burnsville, Minnesota
May 17, 1977
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-71
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HIPPS
MITCHELL HEIGHTS THIRD
ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Hipps Mitchell Heights
Third Addition , dated May 13, 1977 , a copy
of which is attached hereto and amended as follows:
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of
the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and
amendments thereto and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
y��g
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council.
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: May 12, 1977
SUBJECT: Petition for Paving on Riley Lake Road
I.C. 51-305
The attached petition has been received requesting a bituminous paving
overlay on a portion of Riley Lake Road. Three out of the four property
owners involved have signed the petition.
It is recommended that the City Council receive this petition and adopt
Resolution No. 77-70 ordering a public hearing for June 14, 1977. It is
also recommended that the notice cover the remaining unpaved portions
of the entire length of Riley Lake Road.
CJJ:kh
Attachment
I
y�OtV
1977
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MI14NESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-70
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND
CALLING FOR A HEARING (I.C. 51-305)
WHEREAS, a petition has been received requesting the following
described improvements;
I.C. 51-305, Bituminous paving overlay on
Riley Lake Road abutting petitioner's
properties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on
the 14th day of June, 1977, at 7:00 P.M. at the Eden Prairie
City Hall. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed
notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEA'
John D. Frane, Clerk
g411
PETITION Folz LC)C;,L
To Vx Elen Prairie City Council:
7re property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City
Gunnell W c0":-jd('r making the following described improvements(s)
(General Location)
Sanitary Fewer
Waternain
Storm Sewer
x Street Paving
Other
Street Mdrcss or other
Legal Dv-scription of
Names of Petitioners
Propc-,rty,to Se2Lv_ed (Must Be Property Cv'ners)
OZ. /"-,-
7 L
(ror City Use)
Date Received
Project No.
Co,zincil Considc.raLlon
I
i
1
1
I
N
t•
ScAI-e 1�=rr5oo'
{xtvTINC MAT . ..j
PEI ITION EBS
i
f-
z To
DO
v I ,/
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
May 3, 1977
CONTRACTOR (I & 2 FAMILY) 3.2 BEER OFF SALE
Carr Properties, Inc. Lyons Tap*
Cedar Crest Building Corp.
Crest Investment Corp. 3.2 BEER ON SALE
Economy Builders
John Mahoney Construction Lyons Tap*
Walter E. Wittman
Willard Eggan Const. CIGARETTE & TOBACCO
CONTRACTOR (Multi-family & Comm.) Lyons Tap*
Willard Eggan Construction
James Construction
Applcation by Donald R. Gilbert
PLUMBING who would be the new owner.
Norman & Smith Co., Inc.
West.man Plumbing
Axel Newman 13cating & Plumbing
Horwitz Mechanical, Inc.
HEATING-& VENTILATING
Horwitz Mechanical, Inc.
GAS FITTER
Horwitz Mechanical, Inc.
Del Air Conditioning, Inc.
TEMPORARY BEER PERMIT
Eden Prairie Lions - Schooner Days-May 20 to 22 j
These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for
the licensed activity.
i
Rebecca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk
quq
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
May 3, 1977
PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE
Lewis & Bodine - See attached memo from Keith wall
This license has not been approved by the department head responsible for
the licensed activity.
Rebecca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk
q
April 15, 1977
TO: Becki Quernemoen
FROM: Keith Wall
SUBJECT: Lewis & Bodine Kennel License Application
Because of repeated violations of Ordinance 134 and attacks on
neighbors by their dogs, we would recommend the denial of their license.
Problems were so severe that Chief Hacking and I met with these
applicants to convince them of their responsibilities as dog owners.
They agreed to take positive action, however, a short time later one of
their dogs bit a passer-by and complaints from our residents continued.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
May 17, 1977
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family)
Kohan Enterprises, Inc.
Miles Garages, A Division of Insilco
Oertel Construction Co.
Dehaas, Inc.
CONTRACTOR (Multi-family & Comm.)
John Lambin Construction Co.
Olson Concrete Co.
Design Management Construction Co., Inc.
PLUMBING
Russ Anderson Plumbing
HEATING & VENTILATING
A. Binder & Son, Inc.
Seasonal Control
GAS FITTER
Seasonal Control
These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for
the licensed activity.
Rebecca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk
q0
May 17, 1977
05-13-77 5502 JOHN FRANE April expenses 109.6(
5503 NICHOLOS FOWLICK Gymleader services 18.0(
5504 FLYING CLOUD OIL CO. Diesel fuel 1,257.0(
5505 GUY'S AUTO SUPPLY, INC. Equipment parts 6.4(
5506 GENERAL SPORTS Bolco bases-Park & Rec. Dept. 607.0(
5507 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORP. Repair front suction on pumper-
Fire dept. 256.0;
5508 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Radio repairs-Fire Dept. 54.9E ;
5509 HOPKINS TILE AND CARPET Plastic runner for carpet protection-
Public Safety Dept. 10.51
5510 HUDSON MAP COMPANY Street atlas' for Public Safety Dept. 111.2(
5511 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT Air compressor-Public Works Dept. 3,196.0.
5512 VOID CHECK
5513 HENNEPIN COUNTY Supplies-Cty 4 Bike Way 15.9E t.
5514 HENNEPIN COUNTY 1/2 section maps with aerial photo
overlay-Engineering Dept. 289.3 '
5515 HENNEPIN COUNTY Forms-Assessing Dept. 46.6,
5516 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC. Radar repair-Public Safety Dept. 105.0
5517 JAMES JENSEN Mileage 18.5
5518 HARRY S. JOHNSON COMPANIES Survey services-New Testiment Church 97.5
5519 JOHN'S WELDING SERVICE, INC. Thaw water pipes-Water Dept. 140.0
5520 MARTY JESSEN Reimbursement for expenses for MRPA
Conference 36.0
5521 ROBERT KERN Mileage 28.9
5522 KOKESH Trophies-Volleyball and Basketball 65.8
5523 MR. & MRS. ROGER LINDEMAN Payment for damages to property caused
by sewer back-up 390.0
5524 DR. G. PATRICK LILIA Instruction services for CIM course-
Public Safety Dept. 100.0
5525 L-J RUBBER STAMP CO. Registered landscape architect stamp-
Park Planning Dept. 10.0
5526 LETTER FACTORY 6" baskerville condensed letters-
"Forest Hills School Park" 130.5
5527 LEEF BROS. Laundry-Rugs 25.4,
5528 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL
COMMISSION June sewer service charges 13,076.4 y
5529 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 24 firearm safety certifications- ;
Park & Rec. Dept. 48.0:
5530 MEDCENTER HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance for May 634.1
5531 WILLARD MCNAUGHTAN Services-Building Inspections Dept. 640.0
5532 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE 97 trees-Tree Desease Program 1,552.01
5533 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGE14 CO. Oxygen-Park Maint. and City Garage 45.0:
5534 MILLER DAVIS COMPANY Forms-Assessing Dept. 33.0
5535 MODERN TIRE CO. Rotate, balance tires B vehicles,
new tires $280.DO 546.7,
5536 MARTIN BUSH IRON & METAL Pipe torching-Park Maint. Dept. 148.0(
5537 MEDICAL OXYGEN Oxygen-Fire Dept. 7,1!I
5538 METROPOLITAN FIRE EXTINGUISHER Two Extinguishers and recharge two units 97.21,
5539 MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY Equipment parts 23.15
5540 MONAIIAN'S TREE REMOVAL SERVICE Tree removal-Tree Desease Program 1,935.0(
5541 3M PRODUCTS Copy machine and supplies-Public
Safety dept. 167.7,
5542 MINNEGASCO Services 378.1r
5543 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER Textbooks used for CIM course 154.0(
5544 NORTHERN AUTOMOTIVE CO. 130 amp alternator for rescue vehicle 475.0(
5545 NRPA PUBLICATION SALES Book-Community Services Dept. 3.9!
11b.0
May 17, 1977
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
J4-29-77 5461 VOID OUT CHECK (30.0(
)3-11-77 9990 VOID OUT CHECK 25.0(
)5-02-77 5466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employers contribution and employees
ASSOC. withheld 4-29 payroll 4,739.9(
5467 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 4-29 payroll 22.0
5468 STATE OF MINNESOTA Taxes withheld for the month of
April 7,531.9:
5469 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 4-29 payroll 5,455.0
5470 POSTMASTER Postage for utility bills 39.1'
5-05-77 5471 ROGER ULSTAD May expenses 100.0;
5472 INSTY-PRINTS Cards to recruit firemen 13.3;
5473 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage for newsletter mailing 271.0'
;5-10-11 5474 STATE OF MINNESOTA April sales tax collected 985.0:
5475 WAUWATOSA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Conference fee for three Public Safety
Off icers 135.0c
5476 SHERATON MAYFAIR HOTEL Lodging for one night for Public Safety
Officers at conference 43.6t
5477 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL
COMMISSION April reserve capacity charge report 20,418.7'
5478 PETTY CASH To reimburse fund at City Hall 47.2,
5479 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment parts 32.7;
-13-77 5480 EARL ANDERSEN & ASSOC. Traffic control signs 220.9t .
5481 AKINS FIRE & EQUIPMENT Hose clamp & adapter-Fire Dept. 142.5(
5482 A & H WELDING Steel for repairs-City Garage 11.7! .
5483 PAUL BROWN Volleyball official services 236.5(
5484 BRAUER & ASSOC. Services-Scenic Heights Upgrading 1,634.4!
5485 BESTOS PRODUCTS CO. Gasoline transfer units for new
Public Safety cars 68.9£
5486 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO. Key rings and locks-Public Safety Dept. 22.0
5487 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. Rock-Park dept. 37.3;
5488 CHANHASSEN PHARMACY Pens-Engineering Dept. 4.3<
5489 JACK CRELLY Instruction services for Crash Injury
Management 200.0( i
5490 LEONARD CRANDALL Instruction services for CIM course 50.0(
5491 CHANHASSEN TIRE & AUTO Repair services 7.0(
5492 COPY EQUIPMENT Supplies-Engineering Dept. 26.2(
5493 CASTLE CHEMICAL CO., INC. Lignasan-To be resold 1,195.0( i
5494 CROWN RUBBER STAMP Desk inserts - New commission
members 65.6C
5495 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO. Bid ad-Stewart Highlands and Heritage
Road No. of TH5 175.3L
5496 DORHOLT PRINTING Supplies and printed forms 234.74
5497 DOYLE LOCK COMPANY Duplicate Ace keys-Public Safety Dept. 21.5E
5498 DALCO Cleaning supplies-City Hall, City
Garage and Water Plant 137.40
5499 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY NEWS Ads for April 403.90
5500 EDENVALE GOLF CLUB Golf instructions 630.00
5501 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL City share of Community Education
Program for year 1977 4,400.00
yjpl
May 17, 1977
05-13-77 5546 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK
OF MINNEAPOLIS Bond payments 117,948.2'
5547 NORTHWESTERN BELL Services 189.6'
5548 DR. JOHN O'CONNELL Instruction services for CIM course 100.0(
5549 DICK PUTNAM April expenses 118.4'
5550 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance for May 2,788.41
5551 POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT CO. Lights for new cars 29.9�
5552 PITNEY BOWES Postage meter ink rollers 25.&
5553 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Pop machine 129.8(
5554 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC. Services-Heritage Road No of TH5,
Forest Knolls 2nd, Stewart Highlands
and Eden View I 7,716.6'
5555 DONNA STANLEY April services 176.7
5556 DON STODOLA'S WELL DRILLING Service call-City Hall water problem 24.0�
5557 SPRAGG ELECTRONICS Radio repair-Public Safety Dept. 7.51
5558 ED SORENSEN Mileage 93.11
5559 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES, INC. Portable restrooms-Ball fields 60.1.
5560 STARR OFFICE SERVICES, INC. Lift off tapes and typewritter ribbons 96.0!
5561 ST. PAUL BOOK Supplies-Public Safety Dept. 36.7:
5562 DON STREICHER GUNS Ammunition-Public Safety Dept. 147.3�
5563 GORDON SMITH COMPANY Fuel and equipment oil 156.9
5564 LOREA THOMAS Mileage 23.1
5565 LOWELL THONE State building test fees and photo
developing for Building Dept. 42.6
5566 LOREN WOLSKY Gym leader services 18.0,
5567 JUDY SKJEE Calligraphy instructions 96.0,
5568 CAROLYN CASSOLA Guitar instructions 432.0(
5569 TERESA WALTON Tennis class refund 13.6i
5570 GINO RODRIQUEZ Services as basketball scorekeeper 60.01
5571 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF
MINNEAPOLIS Paying agent charges 278.8.
5572 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. Services-Water Plant 1,133.4(
5573 CHRIS ENGER Mileage 24.2`
5574 ROGER ULSTAO Meeting expenses 23.6(
5575 ELIZABETH JOHNSON April services 280.9(
5576 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOC. City's share of services during
strike 17.1(
TOTAL 209,086.3 +�
I
I�G90