Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council - 02/08/1977
• • EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1977 7:30 PM, CITY HALL • COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Marty Jessen; Engineer Carl Jullie; Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary • INVOCATION PLEDGE u,' ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. PUBLIC HEARINGS (private/Public PUB's) A. Miley's Sprinkler System rezoning, County Road 1 & U.S. 169 PUD. Page 3892 A planned unit deve opment for approximately 27 acres of industrial and residential uses and first phase rezoning of the Miley • Sprinkler System site from Rural to I-2 Park. The PUD is located ir the northwest quadrant of U.S. 159 and Co.Rd. 1. (Resolution No. 77-18, and Ordinance No. 77-8.1 B. Eden Prairie Industrial Park PUD & Rezoning to Industrial. The Page 3912 PUD is located in the southeast quadrant of Co.Rd. 4/Toi-5 to Railroad. Rezoning is being request from I-2 Park to I-General. • (Resolution No. 77-19, and Ordinance N . 77-9). fo III. P[TITI%N3, RE UESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request y the Eden Prairie School Board for a Joint Meeting with the City Geunc�l. IV. riRDINrd10ES o RESLi1T1ONS A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 353, approving the request for rezoning. Page 3932 for Rauenhorst Corporation, Opus II, Phase 1, of approximately 5 acres from Rural to Office-(Rezoning agreement and Joint Powers Agreement between Eden Prairie and Minnetonka). B. Resolution No. 77-12, approving the preliminary plat and final plat Page 3939 of Opus 11 2nd Addition. V. NEW BUSINESS , VI. ADJOURNMENT. r -lx ) • ikkriiJ„�oebt ►° • CCetat Pad ' • MAC l!I�IPOZ►'S COMMISSION .-• P.0 (C t1 0 • TWIN CITY AIRPORT • MINNESOTA 55111 OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE(612)7265770 • • FEE. .,,7,•• • • January 31, 1977 • • Roger Ulstad City Manager of Eden Prairie City Hall 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Dear Roger, We have received the notice of Public Hearing for the project: NW US169/ County Road #1 PUD, Miley Re2 Developer Landowners and City of Eden Prairie Land Development fLD-77-PUD-02, 76-Z-23 and have reviewed this site from airport operational standpoint. We do not anticipate that the HUD and MPCA Noise Standards will be exceeded in this area, however, we do have some concern about its relative close location to Flying Cloud Airport. Therefore, we could expect that on occasions the residents in this area would hear some noise from the ground operations at Flying Cloud Airport. In view of this we would urge that the potential residents of the proposed Fr development be advised that they may at times hear airport activity in order to alleviate any potential concern even though it is not expected noise standards will be exceeded. Sincerely, eAdae Claude C. Schmidt Director of Operations and Environmental Affairs CCS/sjp • OFFICE LOCAT ALL SO --%VEST TER!•INAL AREA-MINNEAPOLIS•SAINT PAUL IATERNATIONAL AIRPORT 3 ecaa • PLANNING STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dick Putnam, Planning Director DATE: January 19. 1977 , PROJECT: Co. Rd. 1/ US 169 Planned Unit Development and rezoning first phase Miley Sprinkler Systems LOCATION: Approximately 20-25 acres northwest quadrant of US 169/ Co. Rd. 1 intersection REQUEST: Planned Unit Development approval and rezoning of • first phase to 1-2 Park PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 1. Ownership The property within the study area is owned by the following as illustrated . on figure 1 • ', Raze Nursery j'1. yetiLrTfturn ! ' Mr..Zimmerman 1 ' • h�0,,,, , Mr. Barney ; f ; >,, City of Eden Prairie 1* Inn. ti 1 j ' ! • I IX . w'.Yn ,i • L•.r N•,.,wu ) ,> -±i:: 3�93 • Staff Report-Co. Rd. 1/US 169 PUD -2- Jan. 19, 1977 • 2. Development - Since the property has 7 owners each having different development schedules, improvements would most likely be petitioned to the city and assessed by normal city policies. It is anticipated that many of the properties might be acquired and combined for development or may be developed individually. 3. Development Method/Timing Since —seven owners are involved , petitions for public improvements and rezoning would be the method for development on the remaining parcels. Immediate development of one use, Miley Sprinkler Systems, is proposed to begin early 1977. Timing would be. dependent upon the marketing of the property and the extension of utilities and road improvements to the site. Improvements to the intersection of Co. Rd. 1 and US 169 may be anticipated in 1978 as^proposed by the Highway Department Safety Improvement Program. • • 4. Critical Public Decisions a. Approval of the PUD concept plan for the 27 acre industrial residential area. b. Rezoning ±2 acre Miley Sprinkler System site to I-2 Park • consistent with the approved PUD concept plan. • B. PLAN AREA IDENTIFICATION • • 1. Project Area • Figure 2, page 3, illustrates the boundary of the Co. Rd. 1/US 169 Planned Unit Development. • 3 791/ - • • . : , . • :'71 Staff Report- Co. Rd. 1 /US 169 PUD Jan. 19,1977 • • • .:. • FIGURE 2 • .,..,::::.. . I .. . ./e- • :. • . , r •: ...t /...--' . .":..:„*N"------•.-•. -.•.-,.....,..;_,s_._•_••_\\.• :-•.....‘..---r`.d.•.—..-... %jA• i io;fi s..,.0.....). .w.. 0 - - v (i „ e `.) ) 0 „ %- 7 _ .•7 "" . iisaaew _ . , /- 'e... :... '. ..911631000. \ ‘„....--..""....... .. . • . . . . ._. , . ,.. `\''.:-.. ..I • . , ...„,..1.. lb : . 2.---" " .401.00".liPasanct,----6,, \ \ \.,,,.. • . • -.....A.---. ..- • , ' t . ‘ '•,. . -/ „ tow' .. .,•00. ''''°5'•\--Cr-'"',. t.4k4 s ‘' .\\ .i.,..- ', • k„,, \-,'•..."-:r , • . • \ • : 1 ,11 . . t..\ •,!,. ck.,.o \\--•• . • _____/. ., . 0 tr -- ,..\V \....._........ '.. .•••- ‘ A .• ‘t 1.. K / .?'/V ' • I..'" Ai • , A t‘,.)....•;;,"':./I.•.:../ k'• 0, , ow \.______...----,4 \\‘,.\,,:,\\t. .IL j,.....t../ -,• . „,t 1 ty (CO3-- \ ‘ ‘, •, ..,........--,-''' 6/e.';'.•'2 :..%Ki.'al.--...., p .. ' . ,...._.. -'::::-- .---.ig-"::-0 tt,)-\-...-.0"'"- :1„,•....„. \Mi..ley prp.poe<77-\:\ r-k .fi; oti----.9 ... .1.. .. 4,s.,..- ,..;' / Study Area ., . \ r---.-,\ .- •• Boundary 1/ e.-1\,, l'7.1`'' —' ,...0,..._ .. . . .• • • . • \K-It'-'>:---\ -..-?' . ri ‘ • - '‘•• --- _.' / \,;:, , , -'4..:„P . • _ •••., : * ('-",,,-- ---- • ,*-i'l\s' i % 0\4. .,*: V • '" : %,\\ '‘ ,0, ,/ '' .fC"'' \\ . -4.. 1:.k: • , ..1 . _/.4 -' • . \•\ ..„ . ,•\,.\ /4 • i. ..., , . ,,,,,, ‘‘• /• / •li\ ,,. .:,- ,;,•6‘ . • ••• '7* * , (* N4.,„ \ t.• ;\\,,,.,„i,..-----' ••• lel i/ 4 • . , ....\\'•\\• .c:). rk t,e.. • . ,,,7 't',..'‘‘ %%0 "• . , . La ..,,.:, , , • .. . .,upietiodoesn,.;tovhsesion vieseigiOria P/ • \ • i ,,,• • • — .....- •-""1 "\<.,....1--,P= kwnverors •. ..-", .3.•:,.•,...'Al, s,..,„ . . , • ,. , • . , , • 1 . , . , •• 339S • ,., . Staff Report-Co. Rd. 1/US 169 PUP -4- Jan. 19, 1977 9,: 2. Regional Relationships The site is located at a key intersection,along US 169 and Co. Rd. 1. U. S. 169 functions as a major state arterial roadway and will for the next 8-10 years until such time as US 169/212 is constructed on another alignment. The site is located south of Purgatory Creek- a major city open space corridor The site's location adjacent to Flying Cloud Airport within its zoning influence area effects the site's potential use. 3. Existing Land Use Currently the site is utilized for residential purposes or vacant. 4. Existing Transportation Currently the site has four access driveways to Co. Rd. 1 and no access to US 169. i:i 5. Existing Zoning H`, The entire area is currently zoned Rural bordered on the north and west by Public ( Staring Lake Park ). 6. Comprehensive Plan The 1968 Guide Plan envisioned i)i -----1--_.—_L multiple family and industrial uses for the property adjacent to Purgatory Creek . As illustrated on the Guide • Plan Map the realignment of Co. Rd. 1 q and US 169 will not occur , thereby changing the configuration of land 71/1 uses on the site. en _� a ' I - W . 0 0Y/' 17 : 1 . . N i 3`ay(, . Staff Report-Co. Rd. 1/US 169 PUD -5- Jan. 17, 1977 • 7. Purgatory Creek Study The Purgatory Creek Study completed in 197S defined areas of conservation and transition uses . The industrial sites are outside of the transition zone. The 10.13 acre future multiple and the parkland falls into the ♦ Transition Zone. Development was not prohibited in the Transition Zone, but rather should be designed with maximum respect for the creek corridor. Conclusion: • Currently the t 27 acres is used for residential purnoses. • The Intersection of Co. Rd. 1 and US 169 is currently one of the most dangerous • intersections within the City of Eden Prairie and is scheduled for improvements by the Highway Department in 1978. Thq site located directly across from Flying Cloud Airport. within the noise influence zones of the northern runway, places severe limitations on residen- • tial land uses for the property. The City has acquired parkland on theaorth and west sides of the site completing the Staring Lake Community Park Area. . . C. PLAN PROJECT AREA I- ' 1. Natural Features • Figure 4 illustrates the terrain characteristics, significant slope( varying from 20-SO feet in height) runs east-west through the center of • the site creating two tiers . A swale running north - south provides a logical landform to gain access to the lower terrain. The upland area, along Co. Rd. 1, is approximately 80' above Purgatooryy Creek. ._-v .\ : • N.• �, i .�`• + .. 1-�' %' t6 to...... ,".. —._ ` ‘ -. • .t •./•• ,lC ` \�rl �.1 Staff Report-Co.Rd.1/US 169 PUD -6- , Jan. 17, 1977 2. Soils (figure 4) • Soils on the site are of three types which reflect the slopes ranging from 0 to 18 % . All of the soils have good building potential and are not subject to frost or shrink and swell changes. The soils present two restrictions for development : severe erosion problems and rapid percolation for drainage fields could pollute ground water. Soils are favorable for development with public sewer if the_slopesand existing vegetation are avoided to reduce erosion. 3. Vegetation Vegetation on the site is illustrated on Figure 5 Trees are located on the steep slopes and around homes . Other vegetation, adjacent to Purgatory Creek,is within the parkland. A mixed hardwood forest exists ranging up to SO feet in height. The majority of the trees are worth perserving by fitting development as much as possible with the terrain. F 1 4 U RE: _ S.,.- \,� •�1) d� "`,'�• — % r"l- ( 1 i fP =-- t -..........-.•i " L1. ..am •.J .. � • K \�'�- •? \ \ "--4-' ciek .,.... -'i., \ -- (.1; . •` // © Q `4? / •to �jt t / ' . :' j� ' •\ 4 -.,\\ ..„.•-••••• 4::,•,,,, ,‘ ....frlo_..... - \'• ' . •$'\'` 4 11 �•� , ii • • . \i \\ ` @ \\ '\II e / \ \ t � ls J�•lj(� i 4Mlllarri J i,6,c sagpaipsumo i•t _p r, • r I. . 1 - Staff Report- Co.Rd. 1/US 169 PUD -.7- Jan. 19, 1977 4. Water • • The site is well drained to Purgatory Creek and because of the soil characteris- . tics absords and percolates water rapidly. No subsurface water table problems • should be encountered during construction. • Conclusion: The site has been developed at a low intensity with single family homes and some agriculatural uses . The major tree areas are located on slopes of 12-18% and the soils are easily developable taking into account the erosion and rapid percolation characteristics . The site would accommodate a variety of uses that respect the terrain . D. GOALS • 1. To provide an orderly transition from existing single family use to more appropirate non-residential and multiple residential uses. 2. To respect the criteria of the airport zoning law. 3. Improve access to the parcel and restrict access to US 169. 4. Develop in a manner that respects the natural features of the site. 5. Develop a plan that is economcially feasible given the multiple ownerships. • E. LAND USES • Figure 6, on the following page, illustrates development plans for an Industrial I-2 Park of approximately 14 acres on the upland adjacent to Co. Rd. 1 and multiple family residential of approximately 13.5 acres adjacent to the park. Access to all of the sites will be from Co. Rd. 1 with an "in-only" access to the proposed multiple family site from US. 169. The building coverage expected in the industrial park would be that permitted by Ordinance 135. The ordinance allows .3 floor area ratio for single story industrial and .5 FAR for multiple story industrial.. Anticipating normal development totally 180,000 square feet single story construction or approximately 300,000 square feet of multiple story industrial office. The multiple family tract of approximately 13.5 acres would permit either a townhouse or apartment development which might range from 50 units of townhouses to perhaps 180 apartment units. . • 3 G qq • • • • • • Staff Report-Co.Rd. 1/US 169 PUD -8- Jan. 19 , 1977 • FIGURE 6 • 11. fr' A^A` /• 1 I eta \(�•9 \ `,` ��,! �f�! • ` ` f' ' /`% . \ \1 ' Y /_ a gm 4..Fcr -ttet. I --R: -d , /� .. . 4•.c, J• ''- 1 led\ =1Y .iYe,.• r17 �•\"-.. '. �� :°r, • i .. C,.‘ t w.r a + s •'• T • ht if j. • `�"-`.Y`4`C?C.: •:�`J �,.1. .J +�•C•.�1 .t.�as:l�l�.:.�1=l.S'� • (� ('•Cry i' "''_;`�•ii .� J 9.,,_ a -•_ :R.. "" l JC / • • • 3900 • Staff Report-Co.Rd.1/US 169 PUD -9-- Jan. 19, 1977 AIRPORT IMPACTS FIGURE 7 • \ 1 :'rT•cam.':. \ po 1t''lt1 J.'' /i ' �\t,' e{p�3�,c•>,l�ct. 1.apt `\r` A. - � =-• a j.4. r! :/ '- C:Zt a ,,.,,. o Y 1 -� .•. d� CI:CT-7 ; . �' V• , 5•- ,,/ �' • • ,'..•\ C fi: -c 1 `I 1, 3 9P!, I t ` 1a/ 1t T:,- • The heavy dashed line represents the break point between lands severely influenced by airport noise and those having a reduced impact . Clearly the upland area proposed for industrial is at the same elevation as Flying Cloud Airport and is close to the Clear Zone ( approximately 400 feet ) for Runway 27 R . The noise levels associated with Flying Cloud Airport as a General Utility Airport would be acceptable for industrial land uses. To thenorth of the dashed line , below the slope, the impact of noise from the airport is reduced by the distance, ( approx. 1,000') from the Clear Zone of Runway 2711 and the effect of the 45' hill, • • • 3 901 Staff Report-Co.Rd.1 /US 169 PUD -10- Jan. 19, 1977 F. TRANSPORTATION Figure 8 represents the proposed road systems serving the site and the access to Co. Rd. 1 and US 169. , FIGURE 8 ' • / ;--, --N \-..:1, ...,,_,.......„-,71 '-'( . . ... ' \ AK;2:>''. ' ' • \ ". - ' .7. n <:::.v;e;,,,,--- ,.t! - f.ic . � ,,i f �/ cat -4" ,1 �'� /.4. -s n'•N \. •:,....,•-•,`?. i, /..,,,,,,,',... r it 0 1, ...;---- ,\ .i k• \ - '''''k k ' - ''..1 --::0 --cj2.1-',—CiT;;;''':: - '—• . . Col \ ./ • . •,\ - ,c..yam,; - •�� 1 Y' 7. - w.! �. _ *:..,, \ .,,: .0 \% • ) a�t..i. - ti . • ' I. .. �:•�...`�r.-..ice j ;a _4?.e'�.. " ~ ''� i'he roads serving the site would be phased to accommodate the needs of the land- owners and improvements made by the County and State highway Departments. For example, the entrance to Miley's proposed building ( far west access) could be constructed immediately . A future north-south street from Co. Rd. 1 would be constructed at such time that the owners of the industrial area and/or multiple family site petition the city for access. The street could be built above the hill to provide access to the industrial areas prior to extension down • the hill to the multiple£unity site. • Staff Report-Co.Rd.1/US 169 PUD -11- Jan. 19, 1977 • Access from US 169 , an"in only"proposed, would be added at such time as the multiple family arca developed providing emergency access to the site and • relieving left turn movements at Co. Rd. l and US 169. This access must be • approved by the State Highway Department. • Other improvements at the Co. Rd. 1 and US 169 intersection are programmed by the State Highway Department and Hennepin County for letting of bids in 1978 The improvements involve moving the current access to the south any where from 100.300 feet and extending Co. Rd. I through the existing drive-in parcel or to the south and connecting with Co. Rd. 1 . Under either realignment proposal, the access to the study area would be acceptable and no less than 350 feet from the redesigned intersection of Co. Rd. 1/US 169. G. UTILITY SCHEMATIC Figure 9 represents the method to serve the site with sanitary sewer and water. The extension would not be required today , but could be made at such time development pressures warrant. Immediate development of the Miley Building could be accomplished with a holding tank if it is the desire of the owner to proceed with construction. As discussed . in the soils section, major industrial development with onsitc septic system would not ba acceptable given the soils conditions. r I c u R e 9 t • To 1w11 1Lci:1 ii - i r max.ci..� la r -.hS .. .tic. -r -.._vr::-;,-.r,— 1 Li . / , t -,:/ ��: t \ ! \ 4' ^, \ ,I l 1 i ,t I'( ck1 =� \ . ': ter • , / ' `` ' • ./ ` t1 1 �(( 1 £ ' u,,.✓ �., '� \Vji c. 0 „( --— ... ,_-tea t ✓ • t f.r '- -'-.-7 • ' .'' i k r-e‘ \ \ .'.v. -s, .?, ____ I it\\ ,..;:.., ;‘,,:-..\ /ii • 1 %.•'• • Staff Report-Co.Rd.I/US 169 PUD -12- Jan. 19, 1977 • COMMUNITY FACILITIES The site is located next to Staring Lake Park and will have an abundance of open •space nearby. The development would he expected to contribute cash in lieu of land as per city ordinance or in the case of the Miley Building, the slope area adjacent to the park might be included in the park area. DEVELOPMENT PHASES It is anticipated that phase I would be the approval of the PUD for the 2 71- acres and the zoning of the 2+ acre Miley site to 1-2 Park. Phase 2 of the development might be the rezoning of other industrial sites and construction of the first phase road to serve those sites. The third phase might be extension of the public street to serve the multiple family site below the hill. The plan is designed to respect the current needs of the singlefamily homeowner while recognizing the ultimate use of their property at a later date. Timing of improvements and future developments is dependent upon the property owners. TRANSIT POTENTIAL • The site with a potential for employment and multiple£imily should include provisions for transit pick-up near the intersection with Co. Rd. l and US 169. Improvements might well be made to Co. Rd. 1 with a bus pull-off. Additional • right-of-way if needed should be provided in the-platting of the industrial lots. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS • The planning staff would recormend the approval of the PUD for the 271 acres • as outlined in this report. Secondly, the staff would recommend rezoning of the approximately 2 acres oWned by Miley Sprinkler Systems to 1-2 Park as the first phase implementation of the Co. Rd. 1/US 169 PUD . Future rezoning and platting requests by the property owners should be handled . es other PUDs with review based upon the approved PUD and zoning and plattine consistent with the concept plan. Also, a PUD fee should be charged • on a per acre basis to all land owners within the study area. That fee should he charged at the time of rezoning and he in addition to the normal platting and zoning fees. The staff would suggest the fee be $SO/acre on the property to be zoned either multiple family or industrial excluding roads and any open space dedication. Said fee should total approximately $2;100.00 and would Over the city's cost of developing the concept plan. • 39v11 approved Planninr. Commission Minutes -4- • Dec. 13, 1976 V. PETITIONS AND REQUESTS A. Miley's Sprinkler Systems Rezoning, by Mr. Miley J. Gjertsen. Request to rezone from Rural to Industrial 3.64 acres located at 13480 Pioneer Trial for the purpose of constructing a shop/warehouse for an irrigation company. The planner illustrated the site's location and referred the commission to the staff report. Mr. Darkenwald, representing Mr. Miley , stated they are in agreement with the report and desire prompt action on the rezoning. Sorensen asked if the city owns the land on either side of the site. The planner responded affirmative. Mr. Leo Kortz, 13420 Pioneer Trail, stated he is not opposed to the rezoning unless it would increase his taxes. Sorensen responded taxes would not increase based solely upon the Gjertsen rezoning approval. • The planner stated Mr. Gjertsen may elect to dedicate the slope area as shown in the report to the city or pay theparkland dedication fee. Fosnocht stated he has no objections to the industrial zoning for this site, but questions the advisibility of a public/private pud if all landowners are not in favor of it. • Fosnocht then asked to what use the facility would be put. Mr. Darkenwald stated the building would be used for light industrial and no outside storage would be required. Sorensen questioned the bay doors opening onto the public road. Mr. Gjertsen responded he believes that would be better than facing toward the parkland. The planner added that the doors' orientation may change if in the future a new road is constructed. Darkenwald stated Mr. Gjertsen would like an answer from the city by January 1st and • to build by Feb. 1st. The planner stated such a timetable could not be met as the council could not set a public hearing prior to some time in mid-January. Motionl: Fosnocht moved, Sundstrom seconded,to recommend the City Council respond to the request of Miley Sprinkler Systems and establish a city administered planned unit development jointly by the City of Eden Prairie and the property owners for the entire 25 acres located in the northwest corner of US 169 and Co. Rd. 1 as recommended in Alternate 03 in the staff report dated Dec. 8, 1976: • • 13. Recommend approval of the entire 25 ± acre area as planned unit development with park, industrial and multiple family residential land uses and rezone first phase Gjertsen property to 1-2 Park. ' Motion 1 carried 4:0:1 with Lynch abstaining. Motion 2: Eearman moved, Sundstrom seconded, to recommend the City Council consider setting a public hearing for the Miley Sprinkler Systems request for a meeting in • January. 1977. The motion carried unanimously. 390„ PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT I' TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dick Putnam, Planning Director DATE: • December 8, 1976 PROJECT: Miley's Sprinkler Systems Rezoning LOCATION: North of Co. Rd. 1 and east of Grill Homestead REQUEST: Rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park ( Industrial ) • The request by Mr. Gjertsen seems straight forward with only.a few issues to be considered. When the request is reviewed taking the City ordinances and plans into account the request becomes more complex. This report will identify issues that must be considered that will affect the ultimate city decision on the rezoning request. A. 1968 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN 1 The 1968 Plan recognized the factors that will change the character of the existing large lot residential area. , 1. Realignment of Co. Rd. 1 and TH169. • "2. Airport expansion over present fac- ility. � •" ___— 6% ` 3. Development of Staring Lake :::e: Purgatory Creek Corridor.4. New land uses of industrial, - cial and multiple family. Today the realignments of Co. Rd. 1 and TH 169 as proposed in 1968 are not likely. Some minor realignment of Co. Rd. 1 and the TH 169 intersection is expected by 1978. • 3966 Staff Report-Miley Rezoning -2- Dec. 8, 1976 The following graphic illustrates the progress on purchase of Staring Lake Park and the Purgatory Creek corridor. • Flying Cloud Airport's expansion contemplated in 1968 will not occur and the industrial, commercial and multiple land uses are not finalized. • �e G#k f j 't f s- :j r • s- K • B. ZONING ORDINANCE 8 135 Ordinance 135 attempts to set minimum Industrial Park District size standards in an effort to create industrial parks of reasonable size, 40-80 acre minimums. Scattering of industrial development throughout outcthe e3c muty would o 40 acrenot ccuoccur mum if the Zoning Ordinance was followedrequires zoning district size for I-2 Park. The request by Mr. Gjertscn raises a question of industrial park size and whether a single site in an industrial area can be zoned by itself. • 39o7 Staff Report-Miley Rezoning -3- . Dec. 8, 1976 C. PURGATORY CREEK STUDY . • The creek study recommended the northern slope of Mr. Gjertsen's site be part of the transition zone with the location for his building out of the study area. • ',l • - �F= i -, .: ; - 5 ` � ' c 1 h I • aT u r .• ;: i ;�- it -- �;-• %. s -r CA 1 v \ i . r E, ice 1 \ •-- . pf (- . -veer ;�.; _(-yw ,+ 7'41 i • Corr60rvBr.CY area ` ..Y �.a `� . 106 YBBr IboO cOnlBw `J�� / iti't� a...nron... — �,` .Intl fg 'caL t. f; , _______ - .....:,..1._/.24,,Z,_,_ . - „„f,....22—.,.,-----, ___..1-_—.-- • ,,!•••44.4.‹._ —i—, frA• , , m.c.a. - staring sector 4� purgatory tree . 390Y ?.•• ,• .( . ... • . , • • -, — \ , ..---"--- \ • • '4,t;•.4., • . - ,,/•"- --- I \ \ ' !• ' ' \ .,- .. /\ . il . 7:- --•--‘... - ,) • •• ..,..••••'''''°7.., .--.. . . ,,...i,Cr•-•, , ( ( ‘ ... r :--:•----/_ • \ ', ,:,-* ,--- 's - , \ ,.._..., .,. ___/.2 ___,"..., , \ ••• \ .....„..—..--- .- ----:..., , .., . \ . , -• / y/* ' C / \....„------,. \ ,.-;,...----' -, .., ---. \.: .• , \ \ \ ., ') ( .. " '‘.. \-".._____-- / \, — .. ‹.., . _...___ ........ .7.7 . —':-----:;,' \. \1 :A \ i / .---- , l• \ ,,/\: . ..;.., ., ... _....-n i - e ' , \.t• \..1.: r — . 1 ,,\.-4\_____.—--- .___,..,/ • .\\'\ ', \: \\liti -Z7,',//' '-' ' 1-4\ •kliiii. 0 \! 1 I le,•1*-4-•.- - ' -,-, :: -, , ..• , kh\ , .‘c.t. "--""-' ',-------' • I / 44.. i• -\',s. : '_.,4441.4.4.114 . 4, i ,*. .7 \'.+.4" ' e••••••::',..L(1- • ‘‘. *D./ ' • 4 •1-- -•• '' • ‘ e\)3 '). ---,;‘) C.'ll?' - :\t) 'tij . • \ eid oie, . i. 2_ .; I.i s 0,11 . . • 7 • 1 . . - ;,.... . , , ...... v% .. / .. '. N. ., .,. ) . • ,.. . ,,. ' CA PO"1:1‘..1::\V. 1\ . . ' 3 90'4 •• . , .• •, / 1 , . it • .' i-. . A\ \ Staff Report-Miley Rezoning -4- Dec. 8, 1976 ALTERNATIVES FOR CITY CONSIDERATION' 1, Reject the zoning application as it does not meet city ordinance requirements for Industrial Districts - does not further any solution to land use questions in area. 2. Zone 3.4 * acre site to 1-2 Park and vary provisions of Ordinance 135. - does not further planning for area and may reduce !• the effectiveness of Ordinance 135. 3. Approve entire 25± acre area as Planned Unit Development with park, industrial and multiple family residential land uses and rezone first phase Gjertsen property to I-2 Park. - option would allow for overall planning for area while allowing reasonable staged development. 4. Continue any action until the completion of the Comprehensive Guide Plan update during mid-1977. The planning staff suggests the commission give serious consideration to Alternative # 3 , as it seems to respond to the short and long term city and property owner needs. • • 3911 Installer of... MILEY'S SPRINKLER SYSTEMS CUSTOM DESIGNED LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEMS AND SERVICE LAWN SPRINKLERS w "f ,4r.1r;. ,:4!.1. 7810 WEST 87t6 STREET BLOOMINGTON,MINNESOTA 55438 (612)941-6778 or 941.6779 November 18, 1976 Mr. Richard Putman Eden Prairie Planning Commission Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55343 Re: Rezoneing of 13480 Pioneer Trail Dear Sir: Miley's Sprinkler System is requesting the Eden Prairie Planning Commission to consider the rezoning of 13480 Pioneer Trail,consisting of 3.64 acres, from its present status of rural to industrail. We are asking for this change so that we may build a building as shown on the accompaning drawing. The building that will be at this site will be primarly used for the storage of equip- ment that is used for the installation and mc'ntainance of automatic irrigation systems for residential, commercial , and athletic field applications. We have discussed this proposed zoneing change with the following property owners in the immediate area;; Mr. Mike Zylka, 2520 Arcolo Lane Wayzata,Minnesota Tel.471-7878 Mr.Tom Andrews, 13390 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie, Minnesota,Tel. 941-3119 Mr.Wally Zimmerman, 13420 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie,Minn. Tel. 941-3119 The above property owners expressed no opposition to the proposed change. Not contacted was Mr. Lea Kortz, Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, Tel. 941-1130. We would appreciate your immediate attention to this matter:o that we will have an opportunity to start pouring footings before deep frost sets in the soil. Yours truly, i ( Miley Gjbrtsen ' Miley's Sprinkler Systems r , t- I ! / U 1,/ , , , ..- / . ,/,,/,',/ , ,,'„. :„,,,, 1././.„;///,,,...., • , . /./. • , / •1'. , '' -- '' /•it , . , ... / •" • -- . , i r-,„-•,,1 • . . st.•• _—......4.1 \ E_Hr k V4C 6:1 i ' ''''`-....,,,,,.„....„......, \ \ . 464t •.._ I \ -......_ ri-, 4,I kvki .-...*-- --..... ., ''•-..... .. ..... I Ck . .'• Va . .... . . ( 1 \" . • .,,.,.,, • v\kr . • , . . . . . . . , .. . . .. .. . .. „.-• . • • . ilI,op.,. - ,• -.,' ,.„. ........,.. ... . r •• • , r M .!...!. -,.....,,,,i,,...-..- , :....' • • • • PLANNING STAFF REPORT TO: Planning b Zoning Commission FROM: Dick Putnam, Planning Director DATE: January 17, 1977 • SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Industrial Park REQUEST: Planned Unit Development and rezoning request LOCATION: Southeast quadrant of Co. Rd. 4 and TH 5 to railroad right- of-way REFER TO: a. 4/5 STUDY REPORT b. Development application by Water Products Inc. and land- owners in Eden Prairie Industrial Park c. Staff report 12-9-76 • A. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION • 1. Ownership: The following owners have requested rezoning from 1-2 Park to I-General: Kibbey Engineering L Construction Company et al Water Products Company • Andrew Justus Roll Tank Company Fuller Laboratories Champion Products These property owners within the study area have not applied for rezoning: American Oil Company Kamstra Communications Inc. Eden Prairie Legion More, Mr. Moran, Mr. Lincolnwood Addition residents is • • • 3(1 • Staff Report EP Ind. Pk -2- Jan. 17, 1977 • 2. Developer No single developer will be responsible for projects within the study area, rather individual owners will market or develop their property. The city is acting in a coordinating role by encouraging planning • between owners and responsible governmental agencies. As provided in Ordinance 135, Subd. 19.2, the City Council, Planning & Zoning Commission • or affected property owners may initiate a rezoning action. 3. Fiscal Each owner would develop his property through private financing of building • and site improvements . The city may be involved in utility and roadway improvements consistent with city policy. • 4. Development Method • The property owners may develop in accord with city ordinances and plans. Public improvements common to many owners might be handled through the city • special assessment process or worked-out with the Minnesota Department of Transportation for T.H. 5 projects. S. Development Timing Each property owner will have individual needs for development timing. For example, Water Products would build Spring '77, whereas other owners may have no immediate plans. City improvements may be made over a 1 to 5 year period depending upon the landowners' needs. 6. Critical Public Decisions 1. Approval of a Planned Unit Development for the study area. 2. Approval of the rezoning requests. 3. Preliminary plat approval for study area. 4. Approval of public improvements necessary for orderly develop- ment to proceed. a. utility extension b. road improvements • • • • p: Staff Report-EP Ind. Pk -3- •Jan. 17, 1977 • B. PLAN AREA INDENTIFICATION • 1. Land Use of Study Area "The southeast quadrant is by far the smallest quadrant. It is bounded on the north by Highway 5, the west by Co. Rd. 4, and the southeast by the C.M. h St. P. Railroad. The area is about 60 acres in size, of which about 10 acres is single family residential, and 27 acres are of the existing industrial use. Within the single family subdivision there is a duplex. The industrial uses occuring along Fuller Road arc: Stewart Sandwich, Fuller Lab, Roll Tank, Champion and Kibbey Engineering." ( Page 12, 4/5 Study Report ) 2. Regional Relationships Implementation,.of the 4/S Study recommendations for the study area would result in impacts of a regional character , i.e. , access to TH 5. Development of the industrial lots without reasonable road improvements will increase the existing traffic conflicts on TH 5. Construction of a connection to Co. Rd. 4 from Fuller Road'and improvements to existing , Fuller Road and TH 5 intersection will greatly improve the access road safety for the employees within the industrial park. 3. Existing Transportation "Trunk Highway 5 currently is a state highway and functions as a major arterial west from the 494 grid serving Lake Minnetonka and • . north and central Carver County areas. TH 5 also provides a major regional link for outstate traffic connection with the metropolitan area. Currently T115 is a 9 ton improved roadway through Eden Prairie with one lane traffic in each direction except between Mitchell Road and Wallace Road in Eden Prairie's Industrial Park area. The Highway Department has continued to improve this two lane facility through provision of left turn lanes and bypass lanes at intersections. One stop light currently exists at Highway 5 with channelization of turning lanes. Current plans,as identified in the Minnesota Highway Department's backbone system,do not show major widening or improvements to TH S over the next twenty years, ratherspot safety improvements and signals such as at Mitchell Road would he added. Also, the connection of Highway S south on Co. Rd. 4 to US 212 with a modified diamond interchange at Co. Rd. 4 and US 212 is being considered by the Minnesota Highway Department for implementation in the late 1980s." V. • ( refer to transportation map on following page ) • f 91q Staff Report- EP INd. Pk ..4., Jan. 17, 1977 ' °IPS a-is , ,. -GtN i 9-6 s ,' C-HWY. 4. Existing Zoning__ _ •aesr 1. St ` 8-22 PU! , LI / .1 Jan.'76 Map it P51 <w"/ ~ l {1 / I ; , , . ----.' if. , `dam,: , 6, 3)1 ,= i P1f13 � 1• ' I — iii � ti 5. Previous Zoning, prior to.Ord. 135 )1 i t•r �--:' ,-r.7 u -3 +F ' 1 i .,rrit. ✓' t m.1 //1.3i,./ c-2 ,i-i -....".....',... --;=.--:-.-•-.;::::'‘';:::?..j1 .[IJ i r" , , ,,---,---Lk'-r.0.C..,..----.-/ .....,.,..`.SQt. A.,1 \----- (N„. ,,!--2, 1- - P•O•C Pu'.!'.c.Operri darel'pmcnt•Consuvcrian U nOGIO!:.Ctlon district. C-A nearmtiol Ay:mu:turat dlrtrict.ho„,I.ae•nwr...ynuee••e••i R-1 iscs:acniiai dteirlct. R-2 I ir.ited :letttplo er Uul.1?1c Dwelling district. l:-C Gcucrni i.!ul:iyL Cvnllinn-Lirait:J Commercial. C-1 Lees'Commercial er Sl.:,min0 Center district. C-2 Genorol Commercial or S:,o.piny Cnte'dielriCI. . M•i L!.:fed IO,u!hid i Ltcnuicclurine district. • 1.1-2 GOneret Industrial I'1.tenulccluride district. S-2 Sp.Clol Io lusirinl dlcteiCI. 3giS • • • . • Staff Report-EP Ind. Pk Jan. 17, 1977 • . . 6. Comprehensive Guide Plan & Sector Study • a. The 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan proposed the conversion of the .. entire arca to industrial development in an orderly manner. •,-,--" *".7", *aril 1.7,,,„, -,.... , , .w'r 2'--,•- 1 ! , P. , _..-..----..._ ___, ...:-. 7_,._,,_.„. . ,,..4_,_j, . ..... „.. 0.-;11!.1,1,-.. ...i't•- ,,,•• ' ''. ..) '.C ,_ •-:...-,. .,------.%q• .. __:\\\...„. ......._..........• . ........---\_ -"I I •.. , . s;-,j %. '''I"'Il':.-.5.2.-t- —;:,.—.—H;'1.'1'7;:i.51'4If ., • r,",-,-- '` " . .• 271 . 1'.".i, 'PEit-:ig4;11,...,..:,..,',. ., !urY ' '--,,,,/k . . i _ 0 _ ._-:- • , -...., •_ • '----------.-- --F-7,'---:..-777-1----'-'-' —77,il i,111100, rl, is L . .. . . , . ..'...... ' I .. . 1 . 5 1 M3 2 . ...., . -... •..., , • 7",-.4:16,.. - ...........:;>./ ,;.,, .,..: - \'':•.1\,....,...y. ' ---1------ erj \ •••• ......... , . ...........\\ .... i I C13 • b. 4/S Sector Study . • . ' .0:\ ,.'• • ' , : ....\;.„1.•• _ /...., . 1;._'.-. .,.:`',/,' ---.•.4 . . ...„--..__.._. ....„ : ,.,- t •• 1 .... •// . •-!...!......., 52 . . : ,. • • , • ,.:.•, - ..- , ...• , •••••••/, .....•• ! : .•••-ffr,..:-.r.„,;:-. ....;......„..:..,:,,,......:,,,.....,,,,:ly e r., . .:.u.e...,•::::1 p:...:+. '' '''' ' ',.j i 4 ,^11.-'i ft,t•t-t-tr:LI.-.1-Jott.,-1. t,to 1 00 70-D1 tet,tews.? '-'indu trin ' ', '. '....' ,, .:../... 4-,,,,,,1:,t.., .rt:l.t1 coca...!1-10.I.:.t:.q.1/4,1,t!att Intlt.syiat,art,;-:t,.5 to - Co •. . .•Park -'.• ' _ ' ,......—.'‘ • '•'.'" 1,2-1,-,::..,,,,run.,r...:1.:—iii,kt,,..1.7.1.7.1.,t!le...1tfrr.•••••t,II• ( ', ../,' .... trO Ca,e.•..r.`..!Is,.---,... L .ntollt..tat,_i••r.r.r.a...raO area CO.thi 1...,.or...lat.t. . •'. ''-‘\ . t.3:o.t,..:14:.I,:tta et.....,t...,:::.1.1.v...1:,t 1:-.ft will i,a n.tr.‘...1 V-y,us • , •• s - --•••- -,--,- ..:"..•';t..' ) :ft t....,M.-.f:I, ...!,2.,•I II.,74,1: .Z..,.41,:t•1L'.4...ti...te,tt ---_-'I, ,,;' la4.3:r:-!1:1:rt:o es r re:e:-.:.1:;a:pot..thz :-,..litY of the tetat111.11 ewe. • --..--`.•_,. :,.. .„.„-''. '• ;. ;..,.< ..,:.: Tar.ir,r.tr-o•.anton of v:te:•,..c1-4 eel t.tv,...1.r g 1:.,via!alItY Cf'ae tmienrrol 'I".• ' --1).',,-: ( i:1!..•..'.:".-.", tNa-ec,:lfal tr,O1vrraerrit 01.1a,-1$to 1-i -t...,ty S a•ti another a,eass deve:aped - • kl page 46 4/S Study Report ) '. • . . • • . • . 39147 II Staff Report-EP Ind Pk -6- Jan. 17, 1977 7. Plan Area Conclusions The Eden Prairie Industrial Park area isan unique pattern of old and new land uses isolated by major transportation.systems. The diverse land use pattern would not be as uncommon in older suburban communities, however, in the Eden Prairie context it stands-out. The objective of planning for the study area should recognize the existing property uses and owner rights while achieving necessary public and private improvements that allow coexistence of the residential neighborhood and industrial park. • C. PLAN PROJECT AREA ANALYSIS Sections of the 4/5 Study analyzed the natural conditions of the study area: 1. Natural Features The study area has undergone significant alteration from its original condition. Development of the Lincolnwood Lane subdivision did net alter the slopes but changed the vegetation. The subdivision is atop the wooded knoll and the eastern lots overlook the existing industrial lots. The areas surrounding the residential lots have been significantly altered from its natural condition. The airphoto and topographic • map from Nov. 1964 reflects the 50 foot ridge that was removed when the Eden Prairie Industrial Park was developed. 4C i F • —. j i {6 ---.•-mow+; o '.. _-•- -% ri ). ' • , is _A r. '_.: vy— t•'_->1: ll �- ••. ' t l j J �'1 'r r.nf}....,, 'f/ - /X'' / 4•^!1 Ir ___ - 7' • • 'Y I W,,\ : l /' • r" r •w I r-....''.,r % 7.. �.r .)i `I,� y \4 '`` ,1 .gy, •w..+.r. •:.�v.:.,v'�C`r�..l, �utir w'LJfI\•-- - .„`"� • Staff Report-EP Ind. Pk -7- Jan. 17, 1977 The I977 existing topographic conditions reflect a shaping of the site to allow industrial development. The following contour map illustrates the • altered land forms existing today. j . • „ • -. • 1 , .11.0 \ ., -.- .' i...,': / 3. )'Nz I \l,: , \. ^ f,( ' ' ?\ ) .../. ,.:.-'.'-' .i.' i,:', >:•..';'1:. - / / / , f/ i -r _ \ ' / i I : • / .,. ' 391 .. _ • . ' . Staff Report-EP INd. Pk -8- Jan. 17, 1977 The following graphic illustrates the existing vegetation ranging from 30-50 foot mature hardwoods around the Lincolnwood Addition . The remainder of the study area is open rough ground plants grown over previously graded • areas along Fuller Road tnd the railroad. . _____, •: :..- - ..._-_-.N. - .I ,,c_Jt._ ---iL . ,g.....--...-./ . • / --.. ----7":"•r.----7%7-7-7.7.77.-7'r-7---7.77) .., 5 .- ..-V , . . . • 4400z1. . .., ' ., .. ... ...tef5 ' 1 • %y .•..... . ..... '' • . ..• .. . • • ..• .N. >>. .' -''• . ( L—..1'4&r-1--ree,....N.-s. • • • -.-- - . ,,va ::,, - . ...::-. ..., 4.. ..': •',. ., 111,)0,As / /het tvexA) . .. , . - - • •. , ../N,.., ...,.. : .1..,-.--z---.:-..._-.....7_,.-1/ :!,,\S1,4..... _ '• i • . ' . .../..-1 1 j • , . I ( . . . `` ..)'' .:).!.1 1 !f ,,. \ ' • • • — ••••••• . '...<1.. li,s, ."/ • \ . -....... , ,v,...:::,„ • ...,,.... „.„...‘"'-----_,.--,..- . -...,,,---„,;:i i• -,....----• , \,,, :•=,•,t ....,,.v—..c,:,.. ' - .: '-i---:::::.z,,..---ssz•- -..,. • .-, ".. ----, ,-----,, i,••• „'..:, ,-----,-----/- - . ,-----;, ---",•\-- •_,._.....--- / ------ 7'": 7--..-(--; -• ,• • — ' '...,..:..- I. , -::-. ;) :- ---I•iii::•-r-:•S= ;.•:;• ,. z-, 1 ' .j,,.= .. -• = • . -::••• .::-;.. ---; - -.. ... • • .:. .-...-- •....-:......-t•---,---- la • I . • _..... ,,...,q •.-: elok cymho, -.:: ...•:•;.-.,'„(,; •••1:.„; \••••••,.. • . .• - . . ' - - •. - • . . . . ''':::' .."'1. • ., f:.. ... j i i ;. .""-- : a. . 1 • ) . • fl. • '.•••••= i , • :,'.) , 11 :'- , - I . • N . "2!\• . .. *dr.!• ..%,. . ... .. • . 2. Natural Features Conclusions The conservation of the trees and 30 foot slope on the southeast surrounding the residential area would protect the important natural features existing on the site. 31A . . . • Staff Report-EP Ind. Pk -9- Jan. 17, 1977 • D. PLAN PROPOSAL 1. Objectives • a. Develop higher capacity and improve safety for auto S truck access to the industrial area. b. Involve landowners within and adjacent to the study area in the formation of alternatives and decision making process. c. Consider previous and existing zoning and existing develop- ment in the development of a plan. • d. Preserve and enhance significant natural features. e. Reinforce or create buffers between conflicting land uses. -• f. Utilize the 4/5 Study as a guide for the study area. 2. Development Plan • • a. Transportation. The key to approval of a land use plan is the resolution of the access questions. The city staff requested the Minnesota Department of Transportation to review proposed improvements • • .which would accomplish the following: -provide alternate connection to Co. Rd. 4 . -construct turning lanes on TH 5 to Fuller Road -consolidate access to TH 5 at Fuller Road The staff believes the funding of the improvements will bea primary concern of the landowners. Depending upon the dollars which the MDOT and/or city can contribute, the industrial landowners may select the road improvements based upon their convenience and safety weighed against • • the cost. The following sketch illustrates the access alternatives. • • 39ao • s t Nb �� • ///4'..j.'. • t • JA • W ST .r- N;7 lu,mlwS ¢ t T., • ; . I • ;60..or5 4 or . : ) ao' \LT Aida": ; ii 1 \ i . wr , . t C N ► • r ■ t ‹,... r�.1,// ' S C M I�O �. 1 5 1 to G dy S •ENIC .-. . . • . • • /1 1 L',f s Staff Report-EP Lid Pk -10- Jan. 17, 1977 • b. Land Use/Zoning ' Alternates A,FI,C and I) illustrate different road systems and amounts of I-General . The 1-General use allows outside storage of industrial materials. The 1-2 District does not permit outside yard storage. Some industrial landowners believe that the I-Gen District will make t ; their land more marketable and would make use of the railroad siding. Ib The other view point might be from the residential areas which would be concerned with the views of the outside storage areas. ' ALTERNATE A Extension of Fuller Road south and connection to Kibbey Engineering and Water Products site to Fuller Road would provide safe and high capacity traffic access than exists today. Also, the road alignment would provide a logical division for the I-General and 1-2 Park zoning using 1-2 as a buffer to the Lincolnwood Addition area and along Co. Rd. 4. • • JJ 1„ EEE 1, ,•. ,f ; J, .. ` i ' . i alt /74,` _ . , _ 7 r • Il l �lli C- r +� 1 , Cril n �( (1 f ��. ti_ ,.], o f I i' . .'' .1 'X •fii ..' l / : , 11r ,� 11 I e 1 11 . t / \� • .. _ .. .I t• ;'.. .' i ! • i '! t:,? tr . fii : i ' t : ( ' '. /, l •.• � j _ c Al-r1�7 1`1t.r _ / . • ;II ' 1/.. ..l; ;II . ,,, !' 1 Nas •... r Staff Report-EI` Ind Pk -11- Jan. 17, 1977 Alternate A, Continued Landscape or architectural screening would be necessary , either on the industrial parcels along the railroad or in the residential backyards south of th0 railroad. The extension of the road south is costly, estimated to be $70,000.00 and divides the Andrew Justus property into smaller lots. 1)i .L. \ 11 • ALTERNE B 1- AT It ., ..A—___-„,--` — 19,1;!,.f.1 .i 1.__,'•iiii N /-`..:!.. ' . . --- i,r,.�:..: .S- • • I! a ,, . '. 1 c, i / . .:-..1 -' .' ''". ' -?.-'1::"-. ‘,, ii • ,:,---./.- ',,, ..;.• ::.' ,. r f1 • II'' l I � / / i rIA ' i li i 1 ' i.v.`�.l- pi. obi_;. -.. c,.i... i i!'.' / , I' 'I(. Extension of a public street ,.here Fuller Lab's driveway exists, would connect the northern 2/3 of the industrial area with Co. Rd. 4 and Trunk highw;Iy S at ex:•;ting puller Road. Driveway access for Kibbey Engineering and Water Products would he provided along 'I'll S or between Champion and Kubbey. I_General uses would he limited to the properties east of Puller Road and would requito screening and buffering similar to Alternate A. . °P3 Staff Report-PP Ind. Pk -12- • Jan. 17, 1977 Alternate 11, Continued The southern industrial park property , near the Legion Club, would be serviced off a public street or driveway to Co. Rd. 4 . This alternative would provide high quality and safe access to the indus- trail area at a cost of approximately $50,000.00 for public streets and driveways. ALTERNATE C l i \ _ • •:...-., t j �V L.J, i ,r- f_'� s'ts' . L_____\ fir ., . . il . •" _ ! ., ,. . . . ; t___ - ' %, .i,„\ ., . ,.., , ,; , ,, , . ,.:.,.,-,,-..D..:.• v•;- 11 1.- • { s� , < J,..5 , . . • 1,;-,1-.-:.1.-„... :....../....y.„... \r, ,..".7•:. • i y�, .,• ;• •'• \ \ 1 ,l 1.;: iI ..,,'.,'_'. ,.,I, • 1, '.,-s= /� ;, ,ll +l. 1 • Termed the "do nothing" alternative . This alternative would continue the access to the industrial park as exists today with access at the Kibbey • Engineering driveway for hater Products and Rihbey and no improvements to Fuller Road. Parcels along Co. Rd. 4 would take driveway access from Co. Rd.4. The rezoning would he for Kibbey and parcels cast of puller Road to 1-Gen requiring screening along the railroad as outlined in Alternative A with 1-2 uses ;wound Lincolnwood. This alternative does little to enhance the current access to the site but would cost little to implement. 3aaL1 Staff Iteport-EP Ind Pk -13- Jan. 17, 1977 ALTERNATE D I �- 1 i .r • ,( -!�/..., ( ,,'•�; j' I ?`;;-.,,• ,,/ !/;.'.; ,fir '4 • • • r t_r „f� i t, % I is —r i �- r ;, j-l'', Ii .�: \-) 1 • .I- ;I 1 t ,'/' 1 1lf J III t /,� i t{, • 'iI - c 1• /n,. This alternative is the most complex and would involve private and public improvements. The access to Fuller Road would be maintained as a public • street with private driveway easements granted along the Fuller driveway extending to Co. Rd. 4 utilized by the industrial park owners. Some form of agreement for maintenance/construction costs, etc., would be necessary for the owners and fuller Labs. A similar arrangement is proposed along III 5 or south of Kibbey Engineering as access to Kibbey and Water Products The property near the Legion Club would be served from a public street or driveway off of Co. Rd. 4 , This alternative has the frea est amount of I-General zoning proposed along the railroad and )'niter Ro:r.l, In conjunct ion with that zoning, a area of ; conservation and buffer space along Lincolnwood Lane and the railroad near School Road would be required. The buffer space would not he zoned . industrial to insure its use for screening and buffering. I1P:.ij ';0') ,-7 1 • • • • approved Planning Commission Minutes -2- Dec, 13, 1976 B. Eden Prairie Industrial Park Rezoning., by Water Products and )abbey Engineering Companies requesting rezoning from I-2 Park to I-General for approximately 26 acres. The site is Iocated northwest of the Chicago and NW railroad and east and south of Fuller Road. The planner backgrounded the site's previous zoning of M-2 which permitted outside storage and stated the rezoning request is for rezoning from I-2 Park to I-General to again allow outside storage. He then referred the commission to the staff report and stated the staff is recommending Alternative f3, a'planned unit development approach jointly between the city and property owners. He further stated Water Products would appreciate knowing if their rezoning request is feasible. Mr.-Morehouse asked the commission to give a recommendation on the Water Product's request this evening then discussion on the pud approach could follow. Lynch inquired if Mr. Morehouse had read the report. Mr. Morehouse replied affirmative and stated he concurs with the conclusions of the report but is concerned about the time a pud approach may take. Mr. Andrew Justus, owner of 15 acres, stated he had read the report and would prefer rezoning to I-General for the entire 26 acres, but is willing to participate in a pud. Planning Commission Minutes 3- approvedDcc. 13, 1976 • Jack Eide, Roll Tank, stated they presently have outside storage on their site,but the other lot they own does not, and they desire it be rezoned to permit outside storage. He stated he would also participate in a pud. Larry Johnson, Kibbey Engineering, stated he concurs with the other landowners and • is willing to participate in the pud and desires to have outside storage. Mr. Holtz, Water Products, stated their time table is somewhat flexible , but urge a favorable decision in the reasonable near future. Glen Reed, Water Products, stated he is apprehensive about the time required for the pud approach as it could take until next Summer. Motion 1: Fosnocht moved, Lynch seconded, to recommend the City Council respond to the request from Kibbey Engineering and Water Products Company for rezoning of the Eden Prairie • Industrial Park by establishing a planned unit development to be administered jointly I . by the City of Eden Prairie and the interested landowners of the property as recom- mended in Alternative#3 in the staff report dated 12-9-76, page 7 as follows: 83. The commission recommends the industrial proposal of 29.6 acres be considered in the framework of a pud providing a variety of industrial uses and standards within that area. Certain sites might best be suited for industrial park with no outside storage • because of their proximity to TH 5, limited size or connection with residential areas. Such a pud plan would accommodate the needs of the existing businesses which have outside storage and could develop screening and appropriate landscaping while providing new sites for businesses requiring outside storage with proximity to the railroad and other I-General uses. The area around the Legion Club and southwest portion of the project might be best suited for industrial park uses or development restrictions on any outside storage as viewed from Co. Rd. 4 and Lincolnwood Addition. The pud approach would allow the city and landowners the flexibility to develop the most efficient and aesthetically pleasing industrial • development within tight site limitations. Under such a plan access for the industrial lots to TH 5 and Co. Rd.4 need to be worked out with the industries and landowners in the area. Also, the zoning of specific lots and development standards for those lots must be arranged along with a timing/phasing plan. Lastly, the actual zoning of the property would be the result of rezoning agree- ments drafted which describe development restrictions and opportunities • for each of the sites. The motion carried unanimously. Notion 2: Lynch moved, Fosnocht seconded, that the City Council give this request immediate consideration if possible. The motion carried unanimously. • • • • 3g27 idRiley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District �LI ,w • 8950 COUNTY ROAD 44 L .� • ♦ EOEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343 "4 f� November 30, 1976 i. Mr. Richard Putnam City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 I Re: Eden Prairie Industrial Park Dear Mr. Putnam: The engineering advisors to the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District have reviewed the information relative to the Eden Prairie Industrial Park as submitted to the Watershed District. A grading and land alteration permit must be obtained from the Watershed District for this development. This permit should be obtained after the development has been approved by the City Council, but before building permits are issued. Plans detailing how erosion will be controlled during the project construction sewer should accompany the permit application. Also, a detailed storm plan should be submitted to the Watershed District for its review and comment. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this development. If you have any questions about the District's involvement in this development, please contact us. Sincerely, PiL%SiOL Allan Gebhard BARR ENGINEERING CO. Engineer for the District AG/llc cc: Mr. Conrad Fiskness Mr. Frederick Richards 39az • • • • • • • • P:.:.i..:g :.._...... . .. .......:c:. -a- Nov. - , ..-.i • B. Eden Prairie Industrial Park Rezoning, by Water Products and )abbey Engineerin! • Companies, requesting rezoning from 1-2 Park to I-Genera) for approximately 26 acres. The site is located northwest of the Chicago G NW Railroad and east and south of Fuller Road. Bob Morehouse presented a drawing illustrating the previous zoning of M-2 and stated the zoning was withdrawn by the City and placed in 1-2 . The owners desire to have their property rezoned to I-General to permit outside storage as was permitted in the previous M-2 zoning. He stated 3 properties presently have outside storage and 2 of the new lots would be less than the.S acre minimum. Lynch excused himself' 10:10 PM Bob M:Dcoald introduced Pab Wigley and Dick Holtz of Water Products. Mr. Wigley stated t?,ev lil.e Eden Prairie and desire to construct a headquarter office i;iti in tker'en ;:airie Irdnstria: Park and be allowed outside storage. Mr_ Halt- said they'woaid screen; fence and berm as desired by the City. Mr. Morehouse stated they feel this is a good opportunity to do a cotprehensive plan for the area 6 provide a new site for the Water Products Company. Mr. ,taL:Cs A Justus, representing Andrew N. Justus, stated Morehouse, McDonald, P;`_gle and Holtz have presented the request adequately. • Chairnan Sorensen directed the staff to prepare a report and recommendations on the request. . . 3929 • • t1 1 Q�oovcrs co < �� 5. Z 8050 WALLACE ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343 3 'V • PHONE: (612)941.6368 November 22, 1976 City of Eden Prairie Planning Commission t Dick Putnam, Planner 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 bentlemen: In our original request for rezoning of the Eden Prairie Industrial Park, we have requested a change from 12 which permits lots as small as two acres in area, to I General which requires lot sizes of five acres or larger. When the desired zoning change is complete, it will result in three of the existing tracts being too small to fulfill the size requirements for I General together with the two new tracts being formed by the division of the Kibbey property, a portion of which is the Water Products Company purchase. Therefore, as an amendment to the original rezoning request, we hereby also re(4uest the necessary variances to alleviate the proolem of non- . confor:"ce to the ordinance. esoectfuiiy, ,: . ! / - ?.lip/"/ RICMAPO i NOLTZ l ,4is/hb ) • • r .� ,,,!,� 1Lfl81 11 V EVERY TIME 'X A SQUARE DEAL IPLUMBER CO. Telephone: 938-2741 330 ELEVENTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 s,. November 18, 1976 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Eden Prairie I'' 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 To the members of the Commission: I will be unable to attend the meeting on Monday, November 22. Robert M. Huibregtse and James A. Justus will represent me. • Robert Morehouse and Robert McDonald will represent me as realtors. I am very desirous of having the Eden Prairie Industrial Park re-zoned back to I General from the present 12. The following parcels should also be considered: 1. C&NW parcel 1825 Plat 56717 2. C&NW leasehold parcel 2000 " 56738 3. Klein parcel 0210 " 56717 Description for re-zoning is with this letter. Over the past several years I have had opportunities to sell the above properties, but with the restrictions of 12, the buyers are ultimately not interested. Your thoughtful and kind consideration would be much appreciated. Yours,very `�uy, `l` drew N. J stus, Owner of the above properties 5116 Scriver Road ANJ:bm Edina, Minnesota 55436 Enclosure 3931 "THE COMPLETE BUILDING CENTER" Dull mu;MATERIALS• HARDWARE • ROOFING • FUEL OIL • MILLWORK • INSULATION • PAINT whp/jh 2/3/77 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 353 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to Section 1, Township 116, Range 22 as follows: Lots 2, Block 1, Opus II 2nd Addition, which property shall be and hereby is removed from PUD 74-6 and Rural and sha11 be included hereafter in the Office Zone. Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Rezoning Agreement dated , 1977, entered into between Rauenhorst Corporation and the City of Eden Prairie, which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City relating to such Office Zoning (OFC). Section 3. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this _ day of , 1977 and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the _day of , 1977. Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Published in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1977. 3? ',4 whp/jh 2/3/77 • • • RE-ZONING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1977, by and between RAUENHORST CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, herein- !` after referred to as "Owner", and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", WITNESSETH: ;. WHEREAS, Owner has requested the City to change the designation of PUD 74-6 and Rural to Office Zoning (OFC) for development of land described as Lot 2, Block 1, Opus 2nd Addition, the preliminary plat of which is made a part hereof as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, it is believed that the rezoning of said area to Office would be do the public's interest, welfare and convenience of the people of the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, Owner agrees to develop the aforementioned property in con- sideration of the City's changing of the zoning; and Owner further agrees that as a part of said consideration, it will lay out, develop and maintain said project as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement witnesseth that for and in consideration of the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie adopting an Ordinance changing the designation POD 74-6 and Rural zoning to Office Zoning (OFC), the Owner agrees to construct an office building on said ;. property in accordance with the planning, architectural, engineering and landscaping requirements of all City Ordinances, subject to the following conditions: itf • 1. That design requirements be followed to meet the following objectives: A. Minimize encroachment on the wooded hillside. • B. Create an aesthetically pleasing and high quality image as viewed from Crosstown 62. In line with these objectives the following site plan modifications are necessary: (i) Slight relocation of the building involving elevation and placement to reduce significant encroachment into the northern hillside wooded area. (ii) Relocate the utility connections. (iii) Revised parking and grading plan must be approved by the City Engineer and the City Planner prior to actual construction. (iv) Provide positive screening and buffering of the parking area viewed from Crosstown 62 in accordance with plan submitted to City under date of y 27, 1977. 2. That prior to approval for second reading that the joint powers agreement of the City of Minnetonka be completed between the Cities of Minnetonka and Eden Prairie. 3. That 250 spaces, 4.2/1000GFA is reasonable and if additional parking is necessary it shall be jointly ided dfdhbytra ramp r dconstrucconstruction or upon approval by the City, j Y uses in the area. 4. That work development be done according to the developmental plan of owner dated January 27, 1977. 5. That all sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities, • concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing whether to be public or private, shall be designed to City Standards by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. The developer, through his engineer, shall provide for competent daily inspection of all street and utility construction, both public and private. As-built drawings with service and valve ties on reproducible • mylar and certificates of completion and compliatce with specifications shall also be delivered to the City Engineer. The developer also agrees to pay all fees for City Engineering and administrative services consistent with current City requirements. • -2- 313t1 6, Pay upon application for building permit parkland dedication fees in accordance with City Ordinance. FURTHER CITY AND PROPERTY OWNERS AGREE: • 1. That the property owners shall comply with all applicable rules, regulations, ordinances and laws of the City of Eden V. prairie. • i 2. That the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors and assigns, and upon all subsequent owners, their respective heirs, successors and assigns of the property herein described. I; 3. That an executed copy of this Agreement shall be recorded with the Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 4. That if Owner fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement within eighteen (18) months from the date hereof, Owner for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees that it will not oppose the rezoning of said property back to its Rural zoning. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused their presents to be executed the day and year aforesaid. RAUENHORST, CORPORATION, a Minnesota • corporations l Its: �i� :..Ia�P;1;1 EaTAT1 fJ Its: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation BY: Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk STATE'OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _day of -3- 3934-Ps • , 1977 by and of Rauenhorst Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of I'- the corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF MENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of !' , 19_by Wolfgang Penzel, the Mayor and by John D. Frane, City Clerk of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public _4- J.i r 8 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 77-17 RESOLUTION ADOPTING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN EDEN PRAIRIE AND MINNETONKA TO PROVIDE SANITARY AND STORM SEWER, WATER FACILITIES AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR OPUS II SECOND ADDITION LYING IN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE. WHEREAS, the boundaries of the City of Minnetonka and the City of Eden Prairie abut in certain areas; and WHEREAS, the City of Minnetonka has existing sanitary and storm sewer and water facilities and street improvements cabable of serving the residents of the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, the City of Minnetonka is presently constructing sanitary and storm sewer and water facilities and street improvements to serve its residents; and WHEREAS, County Road 62 landlocks OPUS II Second Addition, lying in the City of Eden Prairie, from the rest of Eden Prairie, making it diffi- cult for Eden Prairie to provide utility service to this land; and WHEREAS, it appears to the respective parties hereto that it is �. reasonable and feasible and in the public interest for the City of Minnetonka to provide municipal sewer and water service and street improvements includ- ing storm drainage for Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 of OPUS II Second Addition, I: otherwise described as Parcel 3425, Section 1, Township 116, Range 22, within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council; That the City of Eden Prairie enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with Minne- tonka providing for such sanitary and storm sewer, water facilities and street improvements for OPUS II Second Addition lying in the City of Eden Prairie, a copy of which is attached hereto. ADOPTED by the City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 393E JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this_day of 1977, by and between the CITY OF MINNETONKA, party of the first part, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Minnetonka", and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, party of the second part, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Eden Prairie", both being municipal corporations organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Minnesota. WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the boundaries of the City of Minnetonka and the City of Eden Prairie abut in certain areas; and WHEREAS, the City of Minnetonka has existing sanitary and storm sewer and water facilities and street improvements capable of serving the residents • of the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, the City of Minnetonka is presently constructing sanitary and storm sewer and water facilities and street improvements to serve its residents; and WHEREAS, County Road 62 landlocks OPUS 1I Second Addition, lying in the City of Eden Prairie, from the rest of Eden Prairie, making it difficult for Eden Prairie to provide utility service to this land; and WHEREAS, it appears to the respective parties hereto that it is • reasonable and feasible and in the public interest for the City of • • Minnetonka to provide municipal sewer and water service and street improve- masts including storm drainage for Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 of OPUS II Second Addition, otherwise described as Parcel 3425, Section 1, Township 116, Range 22, within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie, NOW, THEREFORE, in the joint exercise of their respective common powers to construct and maintain®nitary and storm sewer and water facilities and street improvements, it is hereby agreed as follows: • 1. That the City of Minnetonka shall provideg+nitary and storm sewer and water service and street improvements for Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 of OPUS II Second Addition within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie. . 2. That plans and specifications for such improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the Eden Prairie City Engineer. 3a3"1 • 3. That on or before August 1, 1977, Minnetonka shall provide Eden Prairie with a breakdown of all assessable • costs for such improvements to Eden Prairie properties. 4. That the estimated total assessable costs are $331,578.45, plus 7 percent temporary funding coats, plus 5 percent Eden Prairie charges for engineering, legal, administrative and bonding costs, plus any Minnetonka water or sewer trunk utility connection charges. 5. That not later than November 1, 1977, Eden Prairie shall remit, in a lump sum payment, the total amount due Minnetonka for said improvements. 6. That Eden Prairie shall conduct a special assessment hearing in September, 1977, and levy t at het 8 total asse interest. ss for a period of eighteen (18) years 7. That Minnetonka shall be responsible for issuing all sewer and water hookup permits with copies to Eden Prairie and • make all inspections, and is authorized hereunder to collect fees therefor. ' 8. That maintenance of sewer and water improvements shall be the responsibility of Minnetonka at no expense to Eden Prairie. 9. That Minnetonka shall read all water meters and bill the properties in Eden Prairie directly for sewer and water service. 10. That upon request by Minnetonka, Eden Prairie shall levy • . special assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 and reimburse Minnetonka if said Eden Prairie properties are delinquent by six (6) months or more in payment of such utility charges. CITY OF MINK EroSKA ( (sat) BY: (Carsten 0. Leikvold, City Manager ( YJoh C. Bail¢ . CitYr 1c uP zu PRAIRIE (SEAL) BY: Roger R. Ulatad, City Manager Wolfgang H. Penzel, City Mayor -2- 93)4 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 77-12 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT OF OPUS II 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Opus II 2nd Addition has been submitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie dncevCe odeen de and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings duly had thereunder; and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and Ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: ' A. Plat Approval Request for Opus II 2nd Addition is herein • approved, in accordance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this Plat dated January 27, 1977. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this R�sol+tior, in the office of the Register of Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution•to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council. ADOPTED by the City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel., Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • 5V 1 • approved Planning Commission Minutes -2- ,Decc:.!er 27, 1976 V. PETITIONS AND REQUESTS A. Opus II Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat, Rauenhorst Corporation's request to preliminary plat the approved PUD of Opus II into 3 lots. The 19 acre PUD is located in the northwest corner of Co. Rd. 16 and C.S.A.H. 62. The planner pointed out the location of the PUD plat and the location of the American Family Insurance Company on lot 2. He referred the commission to the staff report by the Engineering Department and stated the Engineering and Planning Departments are recommending approval of the request. Sorensen inquired if the joint service agreement was being finalized. The planner responded some type of arrangement would be arrived at prior to Council approval of the plat. • Motion ]: • Su-ndstroc roved, Scarcan seconded, to close the public hearing. The motion carried unanimously. Motion 2: P.c'arr n moved, Sundstrom seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of Rauenhorst Corporation's request for preliminary plat approval of the plat dated { 12-8-76, Reg. No. 5065, of the Opus I1 PUD located in the northwest quadrant of • Co. Rd. 18 and C.S.A.H. 62. The motion carried unanimously. . 390 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager • FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: January 27, 1977 SUBJECT: OPUS II 2ND ADDITION PROPOSAL: Rauenhorst Corporation is requesting City Council approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Opus II 2nd Addition. The site consists of approximately 21 acres and is designated for office use. HISTORY: Ordinance No. 353, rezoning the site from Rural to Office, re- ceived first reading by the City Council on December 7, 19i6. The second reading of Ordinance No. 353 is scheduled for February 1, 1977. The Preliminary and Final Plat now submitted conforms with the aoproved development plan. VARIANCES: No variances will apply to this plat. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Sanitary sewer and watermain service will be provided by the City of Minnetonka subject to the conditions of a Joint Powers Agreement which has been approved by the City of Minne- tonka. Street construction will also be completed by the City of Minnetonka under the same agreement. Roadways within the plat will be maintained by the property owners. The public streets providing access to Opus II will be maintained by Minnetonka. In return, Eden Prairie will maintain an additional amount of Townline Road, west of Duck Lake Road, which Minnetonka currently maintains. An equitable trade-off of footage will be worked out with the Minnetonka staff and formalized thereafter. Police and fire service for Opus II will-be provided by Eden Prairie. Jack Hacking, Director of Public Safety, recommends that Eden Prairie can provide this service. PARK DEDICATION: A cash dedication of $1,200 per acre will be required of this plat. The total amount is $25,200. Proportionade payment, per parcel, shall be due at the time of building permit issuance. • • - 2 BONDING: Bonding for utilities and streets owned and maintained by property owners will not be required. Utilities and streets to be maintained by the Cities of Eden Prairie or Minnetonka will be as- sessed to the benefited properties. Refer to said Joint Powers Agreement. • RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat of Opus II 2nd Addition, subject to the requirements of this report and the following: 1. Requirements of the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Minnetonka. 2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the amount $920. 1 • 394