HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 01/18/1977JOHN FRAME
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 18, 1977
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF:
7:00 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Joan
Meyers, Dave Osterholt and Sidney Pauly
City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Finance
Director John Frane; Director of Community
Services Marty Jessen; Engineer Carl Jullie;
Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary
INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEIGANCE ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Minutes of the Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 28, 1976. Page 3724
B. Minutes of the Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 4, 1977. Page 3726
III. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from Vernon J. Seck and Cedric L. Warren for a private Page 3736
off-sale liquor license. (Communication dated 1/11/77)
B. Carnes RLS, request for approval of a RLS of Tract F of RLS Page 3737
#4121 into 6 lots. The approximate 5.5 acre site is located
north of lots 10-11 Willow Creek Addition.
IV. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 312, relating to the licensing of Page 3745
food establishments and setting health standards for food
handling and amending Ordinance No. 250.
B. Resolution No. 77-8, relating to changing the "Green Acres" Tax Page 3748
Law.
C. Resolution No. 77-4, Joint Resolution Establishing the Hennepin Page 3749
County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council.
V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council members.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Discussion of Ordinen,e No. 202, licensing and regulating the
sale of intoxicating liquor.
2. Local 49 Strike Status
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,January 78, 1977
Page 3769
I. Cooperative Agreement with Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District Page 3765
Page-3799-
E. Report of City Engineer
3gOlt
2. Receive petition for storm sewer and street improvements in Page -3804
C. Report of Director of Community Services
regarding Park Improvement Project.
D. Report of Planning Director
I. Planned Unit Development, Zoning, and Preliminary Plat
Procedures.
I. Receive petition and set hearing _date for vacation of Earl
Drive plus the drainage and utility easements in the plat of
Topview Acres 1st Addition. (Resolution No. 77-6)
the vicinity of T.H. 5 and County Road 4, I.C. 51-298.
(Resolution No. 77-7)
F. Report of Finance Director
I. Payment of Claims Nos. 3360 - 3364; and 9501 - 9502. Page 3807
VI.NEW BUSINESS
VILADJOURNMENT.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES .
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 28, 1976
7:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel
Billy Bye
Joan Meyers
Tim Pierce
Sidney Pauly
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT:
City Manager Roger Ulstad
City Attorney Harlan Perbix
INVOCATION: Councilman Tim Pierce
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Penzel, Meyers, Pierce and Pauly present; Bye absent.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following item was requested to be added to the agenda under the
"New Business" category:
A. Discussion of the Green Acres Law
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to approve the agenda as amended
and published. Motion carried unanimously.
11. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 1230, recognizing the time and effort of Tim Pierce.
City Manager Ulstad acknowledged the telephone call he had received
from Councilman Bye who wished to be recorded in favor of Resolution
No. 1230.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 1230,
recognizing the time and effort of Tim Pierce. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Resolution No. 1231, donation of land along Nine Mile Creek Floodplain.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to adopt Resolution No. 1231,
donation of land along Nine Mile Creek Floodplain. Motion carried
unanimously.
III. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council members.
1. Councilwoman Pauly reported on the Planning Commission held Monday,
December 27, 1976.
?;72q
Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,December 28, 1976
B. Report of Finance Director
1. Clerk's License List.
The Council requested staff to review City Ordinances applicable
to the issuance of 3.2 beer licenses, taking into account deliquent
taxes and utility bills to determine whether the same requirements
should apply to these licenses in the same manner as apply to
on-sale liquor licenses.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the Clerk's
License List dated December 28, 1976. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Payment of Claims Nos. 3248 - 3359.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to approve Payment of
Claims Nos. 3248 - 3359,deleting 3339. Roll Call Vote: Meyers,
Pierce, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
IV. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion of the Green Acres Law
Councilwoman Pauly spoke to the October 25, 1976 report with the
recommendations of the Modest-Cost Private Housing Advisory Committee
of the Metropolitan Council, specifically to page 8, item 17, which
states "The Legislature should charge the Metropolitan Council to study and
recommend changes to the existing Green Acres Law as it applies in the Twin
Cities seven county area. The Council should recommend those changes
necessary to make the consequences of the Green Acres Law consistent with the
objectives of the Development Framework." The Council requested that a
resolution be drafted for Council review for submission to our State
Legislators. In addition, this information should also be provided to
our citizens through the news media and the HAPPENINGS.
V. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to adjourn the meeting at 8:15 PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
TUESDAY, JANUARY 4, 1977
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT:
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel
Billy Bye
Joan Meyers
Dave Osterholt
Sidney Pauly
City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam;
Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo,
Recording Secretary
INVOCATION: Councilwoman Joan Meyers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members present.
I. SWEARING IN CEREMONIES FOR MAYOR AND TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS
City Attorney Perbix conducted the swearing in ceremonies for
M
a
y
o
r
W
o
l
f
g
a
n
g
Penzel, Councilman Dave Osterholt, and Councilwoman Sidney Pau
l
y
.
II. OFFICIAL DESIGNATIONS
A. Appointment of Acting Mayor
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to nominate Council
w
o
m
a
n
Joan Meyers as Acting Mayor. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to cast a unanimous bal
l
o
t
for Councilwoman Joan Meyers as Acting Mayor. Motion carried
unanimously.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following changes and additions were made to the agenda:
1. Discussion of Council programs for 1977-1978 to be added
under the New Business" category.
2. Meyers requested that on page 2, item G of the Agenda
be amended by striking "Alternate" and inserting "Sfiff
Member".
3. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Pauly, to move item VIII,
A. 1 and 2 to follow item IV. Bye, Pauly, Meyers and
Osterholt voted "aye", Penzel abstained. Motion carried.
Council Minutes. - 2 - Tues.,January 4, 1977
B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS (continued)
4. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Pauly, that the Council commend
the City Manager and his staff for the fine and capable manner
in which they have conducted City business during the past year.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the agenda as amended
and published. Motion carried unanimously.
IV.MINUTES
A. Minutes of the Regularly Scheduled Council Meeting held Tuesday,
December 7, 1976.
Pg. 2, 6th para., 4th line, strike "alternatives" and insert
"alternative grading plans"; para. 7, 1st line, after "staff"
insert "together with the proponent".
Pg. 5, 3rd para., strike "seconded by Pauly" and insert "seconded
by Pierce".
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes
of the Council meeting held Tuesday, December 7, 1976, as amended and
published. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Minutes of the Regularly Scheduled Council Meeting held Tuesday,
December 14, 1976.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the minutes
of the Council meeting held Tuesday, December 14, 1976, as published.
Motion carried unanimously.
VIII.REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council members.
I. Discussion on Council Representatives to Boards and Commissions.
2. Discussion on who should select Chairmen of various Boards and
Commissions.
Both items I and 2 were considered at the same time.
Pauly acknowledged that these two items were placed on the agenda
per her request and spoke to Resolution No. 1243 as submitted by
Councilman Bye.
Bye explained that if there are more than seven members on any
of the boards or commissions, that no one would be taken off, but as
terms expire or resignations occur, no appointments would be made
beyond the seven members.
General discussion took place among Council members and changes
were made to Resolution No. 1243.
37.2-1
Council Minutes
- 3 - Tues.,January 4, 1977
A. Reports of Council members (continued)
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resol
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
2
4
3
,
relating to the composition; appointment of members and
t
e
r
m
s
o
f
o
f
f
i
c
e
of members of City advisory commissions and boards.
Meyers requested that an item be added at the beginning
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
agenda for "Reports from Advisory Boards and Commissio
n
s
"
.
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
members agreed with this request.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to call the
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
.
Osterholt, Bye and Pauly voted "aye", Meyers and Penzel
v
o
t
e
d
"
n
a
y
"
.
Motion carried.
Meyers requested that the following language be added
t
o
i
t
e
m
7
o
f
Resolution No. 1243: "unless the Council by unanimous v
o
t
e
r
e
a
p
p
o
i
n
t
s
such members to the board or commission". Council membe
r
s
a
g
r
e
e
d
t
o
include this in Resolution No. 1243.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Reso
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
2
4
3
as modified, relating to the composition; appointment of
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
a
n
d
t
e
r
m
s
of.office of members of City advisory commissions and bo
a
r
d
s
.
O
s
t
e
r
h
o
l
t
,
Bye, Meyers and Pauly voted "aye", Penzel voted "nay".
M
o
t
i
o
n
c
a
r
r
i
e
d
.
(Resolution No. 1243 as modified attached as part of min
u
t
e
s
)
V. APPOINTMENTS
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to continue
i
t
e
m
s
A
-
F
t
o
March 1, 1977, and that members whose terms expire bef
o
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
i
m
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
on until new appointments are made. Motion carried una
n
i
m
o
u
s
l
y
.
Penzel requested that letters be sent to members whose te
r
m
s
h
a
v
e
e
x
p
i
r
e
d
on various boards and commissions asking them to conti
n
u
e
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
u
n
t
i
l
March when appointments are made.
G. CATV Study Commission - Appointment of Council Represe
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
o
n
e
Staff member. Appointment by Council.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to appoint
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
w
o
m
a
n
Meyers and City Manager Ulstad to the CATV Study Comm
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
M
o
t
i
o
n
carried unanimously.
H. Metropolitan League of Municipalities - Appointment of 1
R
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
and 4 Alternates. Appointments by Council - 1 year term
.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to appoint Ma
y
o
r
P
e
n
z
e
l
as the Representative, and the remainder of the Council
a
s
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
s
to the Metropolitan League of Municipalities for a 1 ye
a
r
t
e
r
m
.
M
o
t
i
o
n
carried unanimously.
I. LOGIS - Appointment of 1 Representative and 1 Alternate
.
A
p
p
o
i
n
t
m
e
n
t
s
by Council.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to appoint
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
John Frane as the Representative, and City Manager Ulst
a
d
a
s
t
h
e
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
t
o
LOGIS. Motion carried unanimously.
3 7 2?
Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,January 4, 1977
V. APPOINTMENTS (continued)
J. Health Officer - Appointment of 1 Health Officer for the year 1977.
Appointment by Mayor with consent of Council.
Mayor Penzel recommended the appointment of Dr. Frederic Ekrem as
the Health Officer for 1977.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to appoint Dr. Frederic
Ekrem as the Health Officer for 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
K. Suburban Rate Authority - Appointment of 1 Representative to the
Suburban Rate Authority for 1977. Appointment by Mayor with consent
of Council.
Mayor Penzel recommended the appointment of City Engineer Jullie
as the representative to the Suburban Rate Authority for 1977.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to appoint City Engineer
Jullie as the Representative to the Suburban Rate Authority for
1977. Motion carried unanimously.
L. South Hennepin Human Services Council - Appointment of 3 Representatives
(1 Council Representative to fill an unexpired term of 1 year, 2 at-large
Representativesto serve two year terms). Appointment by
Council.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to appoint Councilwoman
Pauly to fill the unexpired term of I year, and Mary Hayden and
Dr. Richard Williams to serve two year terms. Motion carried unanimously.
M. Appointment of City Attorney - Appointment by Manager subject to approval
of Council.
City Manager Ulstad recommended the appointment of City Attorney Perbix
for 1977.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Pauly, to appoint Harlan Perbix as
City Attorney for 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
N. WAFTA Board - Appointment of 1 Representative for a 1 year term. Appointment
by Council.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to appoint Dennis Jarvela
as the representative for a 1 year to the WAFTA Board. Motion carried
unanimously.
VI. PUBLIC HEARING
A. 1977 Community Development Block Grant, joint application for approximately
145,800 of Federal funds to be used for eligible community projects.
City Planner Putnam introduced Jim Ford, the representative from Hennepin
County, to give a brief presentation.
Vac)
Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,January 4, 1977
A. 1977 Community Development Block Grant, joint application for approximately
34-6-:800 of Federal funds to be used for eligible community projects.
(continued)
Jim Ford explained that this year there will be 35 communities participating
in the Urban County Development Block Grant Program and that it is estimated
Eden Prairie might be receiving approximately $45,800. The application
this year is in many respects similar to the projects two years ago.
However, HUD is looking more and more at the applications and is becoming
stricter. Generally HUD has been emphasizing programs towards low and
moderate income households in the community.
City Planner Putnam spoke to the recommendations of the Parks, Recreation
& Natural Resources Commission made at their meeting held January 3, 1977,
those being: I) Development of the Edenvale and Preserve Neighborhood
Playgrounds like that which occurred at Prairie View this fall; 2) Any
remainder to be used for Right-of-Way acquisition and increased construction
costs on the County Road 4 Trail; and 3) That the $19,000 from the 1975
year program be reallocated for the County Road 4 Trail. Putnam further
explained that the Planning Commission would be making their recommendations
at their meeting to be held Monday, January 10.
Bye strongly urged that the staff investigate the possibility of using
some of this funding for dutch elm replacement and to invite input from
the Task Force which studied this problem. Jim Ford stated that dutch
elm replacement has been mentioned and the only difficulty about this
program is funding can only be used for replacement of trees on public
property.
Meyers suggested that homeowners associations in Edenvale and The Preserve
be notified before the January 11th Council meeting that both the
Edenvale and The Preserve Playgrounds are being considered.
Al Upton, 16163 Edenwood Drive, asked for a clarification on recommendation
1 from the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission which
City Planner Putnam provided.
John Retterath, 9011 High Point Circle, The Preserve, stated he thought
The Preserve is looked at as being loaded with amenities but the children
seem to have nothing to do. The amenities do not fulfill the growing
needs, especially since Windslope is becoming a reality.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to continue the Public
Hearing for the 1977 Community Development Block Grant to the January 11,
1977 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
V1I.RESOLUTIONS & ORDINANCES
A. Resolution No. 1232, designating the official meeting date, time and place
for the City of Eden Prairie Council Members in 1977.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to adopt Resolution No. 1232.
3'730
Council Minutes Tues.,January 4, 1977
A. Resolution No. 1232, designating the official meeting date, time and olace
for the City of Eden Prairie Council Members in 1977.
AMENDMENT: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to amend Resolution No. 1232
In line 2, strike ", second and fourth" and insert "and third"; and in the
third line strike "7:30 PM" and insert "7:00 PM", in the same line strike
"11:00 PM" and insert "11:30 PM". Bye, Osterholt and Pauly voted "aye",
Meyers and Penzel voted "nay". Motion carried.
MOTION AS AMENDED: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution
No. 1232 as amended, designating the official meeting date, time and place
for the City of Eden Prairie Council Members in 1977. Osterholt, Pauly and
Bye voted "aye", Meyers and Penzel voted "nay". Motion carried.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 77-5,
setting Special Meetings for January 11 and February 8 for Public Hearings
which have already been scheduled. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Resolution No. 1233, designating the Official Newspaper for 1977.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 1233,
designating the Eden Prairie News as the Official Newspaper for 1977.
Motion carried unanimously.
C. Resolution No. 1234, authorization for signatures.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 1234,
authorization for signatures. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Resolution No. 1235, designating a depository for the City of Eden Prairie.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 1235,
designating the Suburban National Bank as the depository for the City of
Eden Prairie. Motion carried unanimously.
Osterholt requested the City Manager to advise the Suburban National
Bank that the Council does not sanction free services to City employees.
E. Resolution No. 1236, authorizing use of facsimile signatures by Public
Officials.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No.
1236, authorizing use of facsimile signatures by Public Officials.
Motion carried unanimously.
F. Resolution No. 1237, authorizing the treasurer to invest City of Eden Prairie
Funds.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 1237,
authorizing the t...'easurer to invest City of Eden Prairie Funds. Motion
carried unanimously.
?'131
Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,January 4, 1977
VIII.REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council members.
1. Discussion on Council Representatives to Boards and Commissions.
?. Discussion on who should select Chairmen of various Boards and
Commissions.
Both items 1 and 2 were discussed on pages 2 and 3 of these Council
minutes.
B. Report of City Manager
City Manager Ulstad thanked the Mayor and Council for their vote
of confidence on behalf of himself and the staff. Osterholt
stated he has received numerous comments from people expressing
appreciation for the work that is being done.
C. Report of City Engineer
1. Approve plans and specifications and order advertisement for bids
on sanitary sewer connection for the New Testament Church/Stewart
Highlands,1.C. 51-283.
City Engineer Jullie spoke to his memo dated December 29, 1976
and Resolution No. 1238.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No.
1238, approving plans and specifications and ordering advertisement
for bids (I.C. 51-283). Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Osterholt, to direct City Attorney
and City Engineer to request a new letter of acceptance reflecting
the actual bid figures and contract for deed holder to proceed with
the project. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Chanhassen request for connection to Duck Lake Area Trunk Sanitary
Sewer.
City Engineer Jullie spoke to his memo dated December 29, 1976, explaining
that he thought the City of Chanhassen would be agreeable to pay
$61,000 to connect to the Eden Prairie Duck Lake Trunk Sewer. He further
stated this would constitute a down payment of 10% and the balance
in equal installments over 15 years at 6% interest.
Mr. Russ Larson, City Attorney for Chanhassen, explained that he had
been authorized to offer $61,000 as outlined by City Engineer Jullie and
requested approval by Council members.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to grant approval for the
City of Chanhassen to connect to the Eden Prairie Duck Lake Trunk Sewer
as outlined in City Engineer's memo dated December 29, 1976, and authorize
City Manager and Mayor to executve the agreement. Motion carried
unanimously.
313).
Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,January 4, 1977
3. Annual Agency Contract with Minnesota Department of Transportation.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 1239,
the annual agency contract with Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. Annual Technical and Engineering Assistance Agreement with Minnesota
Department of Transportation.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 1240,
the annual technical and engineering assistance agreement with Minnesota
Department of Transportation. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Receive petition and set hearing date for vacation of a portion of
Franlo Road in the proposed Olympic Hills 2nd Addition.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 1241, and
set February 1, 1977 as the Public Hearing date for vacation of a portion
of Franlo Road in the proposed Olympic Hills 2nd Addition. Motion carried
unanimously.
D. Report of Finance Director
1. Clerk's License List
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the Clerk's
License List dated January 4, 1977. Motion carried unanimously.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion of Council programs for 1977-1978.
Meyers suggested Council members each make a list of concerns,
programs, policies, revisions, etc., and submit to the City Manager
to be included on the February 1st agenda. Further that
an updating of same could possibly be done every six months.
Osterholt requested that these be submitted to the City Manager
and sent out in the "For Your Information" packet with the Jan. 18 Council packet
and finalized at the February 1st Council meeting. Council members agreed
with this request.
Council members all felt this was an excellent idea.
X. ADJOURNMENT.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Meyers, to adjourn the meeting at
10:10 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
T733
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 1243
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE COMPOSITION; APPOINTMENT
OF MEMBERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE OF MEMBERS OF CITY
ADVISORY COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by ordinances created various advisory
commissions and boards; and
WHEREAS, said advisory boards and commissions provide an indispensible service
to the community; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to improve their effectiveness;
and
WHEREAS, it is believed that by changing the composition, method of
appointment, term of office and certain duties of the members of said commissions
and boards such bodies will be more effective in the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie
that the City Attorney be directed to recommend such changes as may be necessary
in the ordinances of the City creating the Planning and Zoning Commission,
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, Human Rights Commission,
Historical and Cultural Commission, Board of Appeals & Adjustments, Building Code
Board of Appeals, and Industrial Commission to accomplish the following objectives:
I. That all commissions or boards shall be comprised of not more
than seven members.
2. That the terms of members shall be staggered over a period of
three years and the terms shall commence on March 1 of each year.
3. That all boards and commissions shall:
(a) Establish meeting time, place and frequency. Such meetings
shall be held in the 2nd and 4th weeks of each month;
(b) Designate from its members such officers as At deems necessary
or the ordinance creating it requires; and
3'73 q
-2-
(c) Keep minutes of its proceedings and make reports
o
f
i
t
s
action to the City Council in writing. The chairman or designated member shall report in person on matters to
the City Council from time to time.
4. That all members to all commissions and boards shall
b
e
a
p
p
o
i
n
t
e
d
by the City Council.
5. That no one who holds another elective office shall b
e
a
p
p
o
i
n
t
e
d
to serve on a commission or board (i.e. a council memb
e
r
o
r
s
c
h
o
o
l
board member would not qualify).
6. That the City Manager shall designate at least one Cit
y
s
t
a
f
f
member to work with said commissions or boards.
7. That no member shall serve more than 6 years on one bo
a
r
d
o
r
commission, plus that portion of any unexpired term to
w
h
i
c
h
said member may have been appointed, unless the Counci
l
b
y
unanimous vote reappoints such member to the board o
r
c
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
8. That an item be provided on the regular City Council
a
g
e
n
d
a
a
t
t
h
e
beginning for reports of advisory boards and commiss
i
o
n
s
.
ADOPTED BY The City of Eden Prairie this
day of 19
liolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
31 3S
January 11, 1977
Honorable Mayor and Membersof the City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Dear Mayor and Chairpersons:
In as much as the Eden Prairie City Council has not made a decision
regarding the operation of a Municipal Liquor Store, we hereby request
the City Council to give consideration to the application of Vernon J.
Seth, and Cedric L. Warren for a private Off Sale Liquor License.
Sincerely Yours,
Vernon J. Sack
16519 Haywood Lane
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
cc: Eagle Enterprises
?,-)3(0
Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes
December 27, 1976
B. Carnes Registered Land Survey, request for approval of a RLS of Tract F
of RLS If 1421 into 6 lots . The approximate 5.5 acre site is located
north of lots 10 and 11 Willow Creek Addition.
Because of his business and friend relationship with the proponent, Sorensen informed
the other commission members he would not be voting on this item.
Mr. Carnes reviewed the location of the plat, ownership of the lots, access possibilities
and the easement of 15 ' asked by the City for access to the parkland to the north .
He stated lots A and C oftheproposed plat will be built upon. He noted that the IS'
easement would be dedicated to the city now, but maintained by the landowners at this
time.
Ed Ames, Registered Land Surveyor, stated he believes it would be difficult to build
the road to the 66' standard the city desires because of the steep slope.
Sorensen inquired if an additional 16 ' could be obtained from lot 11.
Mr. Porter, owner of lot 11, stated it may be possible. Porter then asked if his taxes
would increase substantially when he combines Tract C to his lot. Mr. Sorensen believed
the assessed value -may risebecause of the additional acreage, but he would not be taxed
for a buildable zoned single family lot in addition to his present lot.
Pearl Freeburg, 7010 Willow Creek Road, complained about traffic nuisances of snow-
mobiles • motorcycles, etc., and questioned if the 15' easement would generage traffic
through Willow Creek as an access to the park.
_
The planner did not believe the 15' easement would be that visible to people
not familar with the area as it would not be marked or surfaced.
Sorensen asked for further questions or comments. No questions or comments were raised.
Motion 1:
Bearman moved, Sundstrom seconded, to close the public hearing. The motion carried
4:0:1 with Sorensen abstaining.
Motion 2:
Bearman moved, Fosnocht seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the
Carnes RLS of Tract F of RLS 1421, Certificate of Survey dated 12-6-76 located
north of lots 10 and 11 of Willow Creek Addition as per the Engineering Report dated
12-23-76. The motion carried 3:0:2 with Sorensen and Pauly abstaining. Pauly abstained
because she still had questions relative to the easement and street and would be voting
on the request when it is on the council agenda.
Jan 4, 1977
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA'
RESOLUTION NO. 1242
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF JERRY
CARNES R.L.S.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Jerry Carnes which is
attached hereto and amended as follows:
1. Widen Tract "F" to 66' in width.
2. Conformance with the recommendations of the
Engineering Report dated 12/23/76.
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of
the Eden Prairie Zoning and platting ordinances and
amendments thereto and is herein approved. .
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
37 Sg
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CHECK LIST FOR REVIEWING PROPOSED
LAUD DEVELOPMENTS
DATF.:
12/23/76
DEVELOPMENT: Carnes R.L.S. L.D. NO. 76-P-15
LOCATION: North of Willow Creek Addition (Tract F, R.L.S. #1421)
REFENECE P.V.D. OR PREVIOUS
zo N ING 1ci=a : Rezoning Agreement dated 4/6/76
RES. U.
DEVELCPEI:: Mr. Gerald Carnes
ENGIREF.R/PLi.PMER:
Orr-Schelen- Meyeron & Associates, Inc.
DOC•a!TS EMNITTED FOR REVIEW: Preliminary Plat for Jerry Carnes dated 12/6/76
PROPOSAL: The developer is requesting Preliminary Plat approval for 3 Iota,
one of which will be combined with an existing lateral. The parcel is presently
platted as Tract F, R.L.S. #1421
I. Land Devolornent application filed and filing fe2 & deposit paid
Yes
Yes Copy of application forwarded to Watershed District ------
2. Processing Schedule:
a. Planning & Zoning Commission Preliminary
b. Park & Recreation Commission
C. Human Rights Commission
d. Planning Commission Public Hrg.
City Council consideration
f. Watershed District
12/27/76
3. Type Of 0.7,velopment
Single family detached
4. EnviroLmental an!,:ct11;m,jnt or impAct tatement required par Eavironmental
Impact Policy Act of )973:
No
3739
- 2 -
5, Present Zoning
R1-22
6. Proposed Zoning same
Consistent with approved P.U.D. or Comp Plan?
Yes
List variances required & setbacks that apply: No Variances Requested
7. Project Area 5.1 ac. Density 1.7 lots per acre
8. PuLlic open space and/or cash dedication
Cash dedication required - $600
Private open rpacc None proposed
Trail systems a SideWLMs
Proposed dedication for 15' walkway
Range of lot 1.4 ac. to 2 ac
9. Preliminary Building Plans Not submitted
10, Representative Soil Borings Not submitted
11. St.'-'eet System *
A. Acces ,.., to ae::;oinii ,g _OA, Tract C shall be combined with Lot 11,
Willow Creek Addition
B. Tyne P/N Roadway (Pac% to Sack of Curb)
Private
driveways, no
parking
Leading to Cul de sacs 50
(not over 1000') &
minor residential
24 (Proposed 16' wide private driveway)
Post no parking signs
28.
Cul de sacs 100
78 (no island)
320 98 (with island)
Thru Pesideraial (collectors)
& Cul de t4w5;
over 1000' GO
32
* Tracts D, E and F to be dedicated to the City. Owners to build and maintain
private driveway. At scme future time, after ut4ity installation, a new road
can be built to City standards and maintained by thc City. Tract F should be
widened to 66 feet rather than 50 feet to provide a proper width for sloping
purposes for such future read.
q0
-3-.
NSA
70 44
Parkway
100 28 divided
Fire Road
12
.• Pathways 12 6
Street grades-max. 7.5%, min. .5%
Concrete curb & gutter required,
Deep strength asphalt design
Owners to maintain private driveway.
Restrictive covenants on the land shall
so indicate.
C. Check City's comprehensive street system.
Developer builds 1/2 of parkways at his cost, & R/W dedication
D. Street Names - try to conform with existing in the area. Avoid additional
names on cul de sacs having eight or less lots.
Check list or existing street names. Address from Willow creek Rd.
R. private parking lots--136-12 cone C&G and lull depth asph. design
F. Street Signs-M2voloper or City installs'
N.A.
12. Parking: (See Ord. tt141)
N.A.
13. Utility Systems:
A. Sanitary Sewer Not available (private system required)
1. Service Detail
2. Service to adjoining property
D. Watermin:
Not available (private system required)
1. Cheek Service Design (20 psi at highest fixture)
2. Hydrant locat4on-Fire Inspector
3. Waiving
4. Compliance with fire Code
5. Service to adjace ,,t property
3'7411
1. Positive outlet for drainage ponds
2. Avoid excessive grading and tree remova
l
N.A.
Required
3. rrowa showing drainage
Required
4. Keep drainage in gutters, not in cente
r
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
B. Sod drain a ge swales and steep slopes Required
None
Required
Required
9. Flood plain encroachment
10. Watershed District approval
11. DNR approval
N.A.
D.• Natural Gas p Telephone
S. Electric (underground)
Required
14. Street Lights & On-Site Lighting t
o
b
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
u
p
o
n
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
b
y
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
Underground Required
11. Re-zoning agreement required No (No change in zoning required)
D:veloper's Agreement required
Title Al,st)-act for Attorney's review
314
C. Storm Sewer & Grading
1. Sediment control plan
N.A.
2. Skimping & grit control for comercial
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
AccoMedate drainage from adjacent prop
e
r
t
i
e
s
Required
3. Denote drainage area for individual in
l
e
t
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
h
i
g
h
w
a
t
e
r
for pendr.
Required
15. Preliminary plat to be submitted to MUD
o
r
H
e
n
n
.
C
o
.
i
f
a
b
u
t
t
i
n
g
a
State or County Hwy.
N.A.
16. List special assessments levied and pe
n
d
i
n
g
Nme_ley i tt g____
.*
ORR.SCHELEN.MAYERON Et ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
Land Surveyors
December 9, 1976
Dick Putnam
Planning Director
8950 Co. Rd. 4
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Re: Jerry Carnes - R.L.S.
Dear Dick:
As sometime has elapsed since Mr. Carnes and I met with
you and Carl Jullie, I would like to recap some of the itpns
pertinent to this subdivision.
When Mr. Carnes and Dr. Tangen presented Registered Land
Survey No. 1421 for approval, Tract F was left as a 5 acre
parcel with no access. Mr. Carnes' understanding was that
the city would buy Tract F for inclusion in the Bryant Lake
Park. Do to some unforeseen development, this did not take
place. Mr. Carnes would like to sell this property, while
he is alive, so as not to burden his wife with a large tract
of land to pay taxes on or to dispose of.
To obtain access to Tract F, R.L.S. 1421, Mr. Carnes approached
Robert Porter about crossing a portion of Lot 11, Willow Creek.
Mr. Porter and Mr. Carnes acquired the westerly portion of said
Lot 11 and signed an agreement allowing Mr. Carnes access in
exchange for about 2 acres of said Tract F. Mr. Porter requested
this 2 acre parcel to prevent development in the woods
immediately north of his house.
Subsequent to our October 12 meeting, we have prepared the
preliminary plan for a Registered Land Survey to split Tract F,
R.L.S. 1421 into 3 parcels. Proposed Tracts A and B are to be
single family residential Lots. Tract C will go to Mr. Porter
for combination with Lot 11, Willow Creek. Tract D, E, and F
will be deeded to the city by Mr. Carnes, Mr. Freeburg, and
Mr. Porter, respectively, for access to tracts A and B and for
the walkway to Bryant Lake Park.
374? • :235 • .1.!in%5sori, ..;• • :77.:
-Dick Putnam
Jerry Carnes - R.L.S.
December 9, 1976
Page 2
We are proposing that about a 16 foot wide driveway be constructed
to serve Tracts A and with the provision that the owners of
sadd tracts maintain the driveway until such time as it is
constructed to city street standards. To build the access
road to city standards would require the removal of many large
trees and the placement of a fill that exceeds 50 feet in width
at the base.
The dedication for Public sites and open space would be 0.26
acres (5.29 acres x 5%). The walkway, outside the limits of
the cul-de-sac, contains 0.08 acres. The walkway, therefore,
should fulfill one-third of the required dedication. For
the remainder, we propose to pay cash in lieu of land
dedication.
Both Mr. Carnes and myself will attend the Planning Commission
meeting, which I understand is scheduled for December 27, 1976.
If you have any questions or desire additional data, please
call at your earliest convenience.
Yours very truly,
D. Edward Ames , Manager
Land Planning & Survey Dept.
cc: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
Jerry Carnes
orq
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 312
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE LICENSING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS
AND SETTING HEALTH STANDARDS FOR FOOD HANDLING AND AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 250
The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie does ordain:
Section 1. There is to be inserted as a preamble to said Ordinance No. 250,
the following language:
The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie does ordain:
Section 2. Section 1 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
(bb) Church: A religious body organized to sustain public
worship and recognized as such by the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
(cc) Civic Organizations: Groups organized for the purpose
of performing functions of civic or community support
nature, but excluding homeowner associations and their
facilities.
Section 3. Section 5 is hereby deleted; and there is hereby substituted
therefore the following:
Section 5. No License Required. No license hereunder shall
be required for the following:
(a) Churches
(3) Civic organizations - for short term events
such as community festivals.
(0 Persons owning or operating food vehicles for
which a license is not required by this
Ordinance shall not be required to apply for
a license pursuant to this Ordinance, but
shall be subject to all other requirements of
this Ordinance.
First read at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of
Eden Prairie this day of , 197 and finally
read, adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of
the Council of said City on the day of , 19
ATTEST: Mayor
3-1 115
or' 1 r
DATE: January 4, 1977
MEMO TO: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Wayne Sanders, Building Dept
SUBJECT: Ordinance #312 Amending Ordinance #250
Some time ago I sent letters to churches and civic organizations, to get
their feelings on the proposed Ordinance #312,
No one had any objections to the proposed ordinance and some of the churches
wrote letters stating that they were definitely in favor of the amendment.
I am sure that this is what the churches had in mind when they made their
request for a change.
37a6
B. E;r:;1 i?` Ordinarri o. 311, relating to licensing of contractors
of Ih( ('it..• of 1•0( n Pra ri r (continued)
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to approve the first reading
of Ordinance No. 311, an ordinance relating to licensing of contractors of the Ch.
of Eden Prairie. Roll Call Vote: Pauly, Penzel and Meyers voted "aye",
Osterholt voted "nay". Motion carried.
C. First Rendine_of Ordinance No. 312, amending Ordinance No. 250
(Food lizr,dlino Ordinance).
Penzel suggested the following amendments to Ordinance No. 312: Strike
existing language in "bb", and insert in lieu thereof "(bb) Church: A religious
body organized to sustain public worship and recognized as such by
the laws of the State of Minnesota." Add "(cc) Civic Oroanizations:
Groups crgcniicci for the purpose of performing functions of civic or community
support nature, but excluding homeowner associations and their facilities".
In Section 5 after "(a)" add a new "(b)" to read: "(b) Civic Organizations -
for short term e.vents such as community festivals", renumber present "(b)" to
MOTICN: Pen7e..) moved, seconded by Meyers, to direct the staff to
redraft Orciir,ance No. 312, including suggested amendments,and send a letter and
proposed Ordinance No. 312 to all school officials, civic and
community orc:.eni:E.-:1 ,:)ne recue.sting their feedback no later than
January IS, 1976. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Resolution No. 1°C2, Crime 'Prevention Continuation Grant, authorizino
subm:ssion of te Grant ar.,71:lication and e:.necution of the crant ac;serrent.
Public Safety Director Eacking spoke to his memo.dated December 4, 1975
outlining the grant application,and further stated that their request is
for 3 men instead of 4 as this would be more in line with current budget
levels in the City. 1:e further explained that the 3rd person would not be
accepted if Public Safety's budget could not provide the $900.00 cash
match against the salary for the third man.
PenzelqueStional what the earliest time might be for the City to pick up
the Individual cemplctely.
Hacking answered that it would be half in 1978,and the full amount in
1979.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to adopt Resolution No. 1062
authorizing submission of the grant application and execution of the grant
agreement. Motion carried unanimously.
whp/jh 1/13/77
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO, 77-8
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO CHANGING THE "GREEN
ACRES" TAX LAW.
WHEREAS, the State Legislature has adopted cert
a
i
n
t
a
x
l
a
w
s
w
h
i
c
h
have commonly come to be known as the Green Acre
s
L
a
w
s
;
a
n
d
WHEREAS, said laws were adopted to alleviate har
d
s
h
i
p
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
existing real property tax laws; and
WHEREAS, it is proposed by the Metropolitan Counc
i
l
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
L
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
u
r
e
charge the Metropolitan Council to study and reco
m
m
e
n
d
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Green Acres Law to make the consequences of the
G
r
e
e
n
A
c
r
e
s
L
a
w
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
with the objectives of its development framewor
k
;
a
n
d
WHEREAS, it is the belief of the Eden Prairie Cit
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
t
h
a
t
s
u
c
h
changes would be inconsistent with the purpose o
f
t
h
e
G
r
e
e
n
A
c
r
e
s
L
a
w
;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Coun
c
i
l
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
Eden
Prairie that it Empress upon its Legislators tha
t
t
h
e
M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
is not the proper body to be charged with the re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
Changes to the existing Green Acres Law.
ADOPTED by the City of Eden Prairie this
day of
1977.
Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
31ta,
January 13, 1977
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
KW:sa
Roger Ulstad
Keith Wall 4 0.
Hennepin County Criminal Justice Council
The Hennepin County Criminal Justice Council has requested
our city to participate in, and become members of, this
organization. They have sent a Joint Resolution and By-Laws
for our council's consideration. It is thE intent of the
Resolution and By-Laws to reorganize the HCCJC to serve as
a forum through which local units of government in Hennepin
County can by association, consultation and study,
cooperatively promote improvements in the criminal justice
system that transcends departments, agencies and geographical
boundaries. This agency has already provided much needed
assistance with the development of the 911 Emergency Phone
System, the State Wide Police Communication System,
Hennepin County Mutual Aid Pact and assisted communities
in obtaining LEAA funds. The majority of the police
agencies in the county are actively supporting this
re-organization and see a definite benefit for all that
participate. We would concur.
3'749
CITY Or EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESCTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-4
JOINT RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE
HENNEPIN COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL
WHEREAS, the parties to this joint resolution recognize the need for
crtminal justice system planning and coordination on a countywide basis;
and,
WHEREAS, it is the sense of the parties hereto that the effective-
ness of such planning and coordination on a countywide basis would best
be served by the establishment of a criminal justice coordinating council
consisting of representatives of the parties hereto for the purpose of
coordinating activities which will improve and strengthen law enforcement
and criminal justice, encouraging research and development activities
directed toward the improvement of law enforcement and criminal justice
and assisting in the development of new methods for the prevention and
reduction of crime and juvenile delinquency; and,
WHEREAS, the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968
(P.L. 90-351), and acts amendatory thereto, encourages and provides for
the establishment of criminal justice coordinating councils in major
urban areas to assure improved planning for and coordination of criminal
justice agencies and activities within those jurisdictions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Hennepin County Criminal
Justice Coordinating
visions as set forth
to the provisions of
Council be established in accordance with the pro-
in the accompanying operational bylaws and pursuant
the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of
1968, and acts amendatory thereto;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eden Prairie
to participate as a member of the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Co-
ordinating Council.
agrees
3'150
RESOLUTION NO. 77-4
Page 2
ADOPTED BY EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL this
day of
, 1976
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEAL
ATTEST
John D. Frane, City Clerk
.37i; I
12/2/76
OPERATIONAL BYLAWS:
HENNEPIN COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL
ARTICLE I. ESTABLISHMENT
The Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (HCCJCC)
is established pursuant to a joint resolution passed by Hennepin County,
the city of Minneapolis and any number of suburban municipalities within
Hennepin County which, together with the city of Minneapolis, contain at
least 50 percent of the total population of Hennepin County.
ARTICLE II. GENERAL PURPOSE
The HCCJCC is established as a forum through which local units of
government in Hennepin County may, by association, consultation and study,
cooperatively promote improvements in the criminal justice system which
transcend departments, agencies and the geographical boundaries of the
individual communities.
ARTICLE III. DEFINITION OF TERMS
Section 1. For purposes of these bylaws, the terms defined in this
article shall have the meanings given them.
Section 2. "Local unit of government" shall mean any local governmental
unit from within Hennepin County which is a party to the joint resolution,
but shall not include a public authority, a school district, an improve-
ment district or other special district.
Section 3. "Member" means a local governmental unit which executes
a joint resolution declaring its intent to participate.
2-ir J 11*,
- 2 -
Section 4. "Representative", means an individual serving on the Hen-
nepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council on behalf of eligible
member units which enter into the joint resolution. "Representative"
also means an individual serving on behalf of any private Sector agency,
organization and/or association related to or sharing in the responsibility
for the provision of criminal justice services in Hennepin County, as
well as any special departments or offices as designated in these bylaws.
Section 5. "Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council",
which organization is hereafter referred to as HCCJCC, means the organi-
zation created pursuant to the joint resolution of participation.
Section 6. "Council" means the collective member representatives
who shall serve as the governing body of the HCCJCC.
IV. MEMBERSHIP
Section I. Any local unit of government in Hennepin County is elig-
ible for membership in and representation on the HCCJCC. Also, as provided
In these bylaws, private sector agencies and/or associations related to •
or sharing in the responsibility for the provision of criminal justice
services in Hennepin County, as well as any specially designated depart-
ments or offices, are eligible for representation on the HCCJCC.
Section 2. Any local unit of government desiring to become a member
of the HCCJCC may do so by the duly authorized execution of a copy of
the joint resolution by its proper officers. Thereupon, the clerk or
other corresponding officer of the governmental unit shall file an exe-
cuted copy of the joint resolution with the Hennepin County Administrator.
ViS3
3
Section 3. Any suburban local unit of government desiring to become
a member of the HCCJCC shall execute a joint resolution of participation
and those same units of government which execute such resolutions shall
jointly have the following representation on the HCCJCC:
-- four individuals, either mayors or members of sub-
urban city councils, elected, through mailed nomi-
nations and ballots, by the mayors and council mem-
bers of participating suburban local units of gov-
ernment;
-- two suburban city managers/administrators selected
by the Hennepin County members of the Metropolitan
Area Managers Association; and
-- two suburban police chiefs/public safety directors
selected by the Hennepin County members of the
Hennepin County Chiefs of Police Association.
Section 4. Upon execution of a joint resolution of participation,
the city of Minneapolis shall have the following representation on the
HCCJCC:
-- the Mayor of the city of Minneapolis or his designee;
-- the Minneapolis City Coordinator or his designee;
-- the President or another member of the Minneapolis
City Council;
-- the Chief of the Minneapolis Police Department or
his designee;
-- the Minneapolis City Attorney or his designee; and
-- a community representative selected by the Minneapolis
City Council.
Section 5. Upon execution of a joint resolution of participation,
the county of Hennepin shall have the following representation on the
HCCJCC:
TIsq
-4-
-- the Chairman or another member of the Hennepin
County Board of Commissioners;
-- the Hennepin County Administrator or his designee;
-- the Hennepin County Attorney or his designee;
-- the Chief Judge of the Hennepin County District
Court or his designee;
-- the Chief Judge of the Hennepin County Municipal
Court or his designee;
-- the Hennepin County Public Defender or his designee;
-- the Hennepin County Sheriff br his designee; and
-- the Director of the Hennepin County Department
of Court Services or his designee.
Section 6. In February of 1977 and each odd numbered year thereafter,
the HCCJCC shall select four private sector agencies, organizations and/or
associations for representation on the Council. Such agencies, organiza-
tions and/or associations must have a direct relationship to the provi-
sion of criminal justice services in Hennepin County.
When selected, these private sector agencies, organizations and/or
associations will be notified by the officers of the HCCJCC of their eli-
gibility for representation and requested to nominate representatives.
Upon notification, they shall specify their nomination for representation
on the HCCJCC and, when accepted by the Council, shall be entitled to
full voting privileges.
Section 7. The HCCJCC is duly established when the joint resolution
has been executed by the county of Hennepin, the city of Minneapolis and
any number of municipalities in the county which, together with the city
3 r J
5
of Minneapolis, contain at least one half of the population of the county
and when executed copies from such governmental units have been filed
as set out herein.
Section 8. The initial members shall be those local units of gov-
ernment which execute a joint resolution of participation on or before
February 1, 1977. Governmental units wishing to join the HCCJCC after
February 1, 1977, may do so only upon the execution and filing of a
joint resolution of participation as set out herein.
ARTICLE V. GOVERNING BODY
Section 1. The governing body of the HCCJCC shall be the Council.
Each representative on the Council shall be entitled to one vote.
Section 2. During the conduct of normal Council business or activ-
ities, representatives shall serve without compensation from the HCCJCC;
but this shall not prevent a representative from receiving compensation
for such expenses as are incurred from his appointing authority.
Section 3. A majority of the representatives shall constitute a
quorum of the Council.
Section 4. There shall be no voting by proxy, but each representative
will be entitled to designate one alternate who shall be entitled to at-
tend meetings from time to time, but may not vote in the absence of the
designated representative.
Section 5. Representatives shall serve at the pleasure of the ap-
pointing authority.
9.")1--/
- 6 -
Section 6. Three consecutive absences without good c
a
u
s
e
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
sufficient reason for the Council to find a vacancy ex
i
s
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
t
e
r
m
of the representative involved. The Council shall fir
s
t
n
o
t
i
f
y
t
h
e
representative of his pending termation and, if neces
s
a
r
y
,
t
h
e
a
p
p
o
i
n
t
-
ing authority for the purpose of requesting the appoi
n
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
a
n
e
w
representative.
Section 7. Vacancies on the Council shall occur when
t
h
e
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
-
tative ceases to hold the position which entitled hi
m
/
h
e
r
t
o
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
or for other reasons which shall prohibit the represe
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
f
r
o
m
a
t
t
e
n
d
-
ing duly called meetings of the Council. In the eve
n
t
s
u
c
h
a
v
a
c
a
n
c
y
occurs, the appointing authority shall be notified a
n
d
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
s
h
a
l
l
request the appointment of a new representative.
ARTICLE VI. MEETINGS AND OFFICERS
Section 1. Within thirty (30) days after the filing
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
number of joint resolutions of participation as set o
u
t
h
e
r
e
i
n
,
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
meeting of the HCCJCC shall be called and shall be he
l
d
n
o
t
l
a
t
e
r
t
h
a
n
fifteen (15) days thereafter.
Section 2. At the first meeting of the Council and
i
n
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
o
f
each odd numbered year after 1977, the Council shall
e
l
e
c
t
f
r
o
m
i
t
s
m
e
m
-
bership two co-chairmen and a vice-chairman. The of
f
i
c
e
r
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
elected officials from Hennepin County, the city of M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
a
n
d
a
participating suburban local unit of government.
Section 3. The Council shall have an Executive Commit
t
e
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
i
n
g
of the Council officers and two other representative
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
"3151
7
Council for a term of two years. The Council may delegate authority to
the Executive Committee to meet on its behalf between Council meetings.
Such delegation of authority shall be by resolution of the Council and
may be conditioned in such manner as the Council may deem:
Section 4. The Executive Committee shall have the authority to:
a. Develop administrative policies and procedures for recommenda-
tion to the Council.
b. Develop revisions to these bylaws and policy statements for
recommendation to the Council.
•c. Act as required on those matters which, because of time, must
be decided upon between Council meetings. Prior notice will
be provided to all Council members advising them of the subject
on which such action is contemplated.
d. Report actions to the Council as soon as possible, but in no
event later than the first Council meeting subsequent to the
Executive Committee meeting.
e. Council representatives shall be advised of the date, time and
location of all Executive Committee meetings.
Section 5. Regular public meetings of the Council shall be held at
least quarterly.
Section 6. Special meetings of the Council may be called (a) by the
Co-chairmen, (b) by the Executive Committee or (c) upon the written request
of a majority of the representatives. Five days written notice of special
meetings shall be given to the representatives and such notice shall in-
clude the agenda for the special meeting.
3"151
- 8 -
Section 7. Notice of regular meetings of the Council shall
b
e
g
i
v
e
n
to the representatives at least ten (10) days in advance an
d
t
h
e
a
g
e
n
d
a
for such meetings shall accompany the notice; however, bus
i
n
e
s
s
a
t
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
meetings of the Council need not be limited to matters set
* forth in the
agenda.
Section 8. Complete and accurate minutes of each meeting of
t
h
i
s
Council shall be maintained and copies of said minutes shall
b
e
t
r
a
n
s
m
i
t
t
e
d
to the legal address of each Council representative prior to
t
h
e
n
e
x
t
meeting of the Council. Upon approval and adoption of these
m
i
n
u
t
e
s
,
a
copy of same shall be transmitted within ten (10) days to a
l
l
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
and other official bodies as appropriate.
Section 9. Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised shall govern the
proceedings at meetings of this Council in all matters not
o
t
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
g
o
v
-
erned by these bylaws.
ARTICLE VII. POWERS AND DUTIES
Section 1. The powers and duties of the Council shall inc
l
u
d
e
t
h
e
powers set forth in this article.
Section 2. The Council may appoint such subcommittees, comm
i
t
t
e
e
s
and task forces as it deems necessary. Membership on committee
s
a
n
d
t
a
s
k
forces may be drawn from Council members and representatives
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
from other public and private sector agencies, organizations
a
n
d
'
a
s
s
o
c
i
-
ations.
Section 3. When requested by the Couhcil, and authorized by
t
h
e
H
e
n
-
nepin County Board of Commissioners, the Council may apply
f
o
r
d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
9•1;
J I
- 9 -
gifts or grants of money or other property from the state or federal gov-
ernment or any other governmental units, or individuals, foundations or
other organizations, to perform other work or activities deemed to be
consistent with the scope of these bylaws. The Council may accept such
aid through or with the authorization of the Hennepin County Board of
Commissioners as expressed by their resolution.
Section 4. The Council may study, or cause to be studied, problems
or subjects relating to the provision of criminal justice services within
Hennepin County.
Section 5. The Council may advise and aid in the establishment of
,coordinated and cooperative criminal justice services and programs within
Hennepin County.
Section 6. The Council may render advice and technical assistance
upon request to governmental units and agencies in Hennepin County, es-
pecially in areas of an interagency or intergovernmental nature.
Section 7. The Council may develop and make recommendations to local
units of government and criminal justice agencies for the purposes of
improving the quality and delivery of criminal justice services in Hen-
nepin County.
Section 8. The Council may analyze and cause to be published vari-
ous statistical studies and other reports on matters related to the crimi-
nal justice system in Hennepin County.
Section 9. The Council shall function as the Law Enforcement Assis-
tance Administration (LEAA) criminal justice coordinating council for
PZU
- 10 -
units of government within Hennepin County and shall carry out those
duties and responsibilities as provided for in the Omnibus Crime Control
and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-351), and acts amendatory thereto,
in cooperation with the Governor's Commission on Crime Prevention and
Control.
Section 10. No action of the Council shall bind or alter the power
and authority of any local unit of government or agency in Hennepin County.
Further, nothing contained herein is intended or should be construed in
any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of partners between
the participating units of government or as constituting the HCCJCC as
the agent or representative of any participating units of government for
any purpose except when specifically requested to function as such for
those purposes as provided herein. The participating local units of gov-
ernment are to be and shall remain independent units of government with
respect to all services performed under the authorizing joint resolution
and these bylaws.
ARTICLE VIII. STAFF AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES
Section 1. Staffing and supportive services for normal Council busi-
ness and activities will be provided by Hennepin County and, accordingly
Hennepin County shall be responsible for the selection, employment, super-
vision and dismissal of all employees serving the Council. Hennepin
County will consult with the HCCJCC Executive Committee on matters rela-
ting to the selection and retention of the staff supervisor.
5261
Section 2. To assist in providing this service, Hennepin County will
apply for, accept and function as auditor and controller of funding made
avialable under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968,
and any acts amendatory thereto, from the Minnesota Governor's Commission
on Crime Prevention and Control and any other appropriate private or pub-
lic, local, state or federal sources. Hennepin County shall provide the
share of matching funds necessary to qualify for such planning grant ap-
plications except for those grants wherein matching funds are required
for special projects which benefit or are unique to one or more partici-
pating members, but not all participating members, in which instances
local match requirements shall be the responsibility of the benefited
members.
Section 3. The responsibilities of the staff to the Council shall
be those activities necessary to assist the Council in fulfilling the
powers and duties outlined in these bylaws, primarily those duties and
responsibilities associated with the conduct of LEAA programs within Hen-
nepin County.
Section 4. As provided in Section 2 of this Article and Article VII,
Section 3, of these bylaws, the Council may retain special staff and sup-
portive services to perform other work and activities deemed to be con-
sistent with these bylaws.
ARTICLE IX. WITHDRAWAL, DISSOLUTION AND DURATION
Section I. Any member may, at any time, by resolution of its govern-
ing body, give written notice of withdrawal from the HCCJCC. Actual
- 12 -
withdrawal shall not take effect for a period of thirty (30) days from
the date that the written notice of withdrawal has been received by the
HCCJCC.
Section 2. The Council shall be dissolved (a) whenever a sufficient
number of members, excepting Hennepin County, withdraw from the Council
to reduce the total number of members to a level wherein the remaining
members do not represent at least one half of the county population; (b).
by two-thirds vote of all the representatives on the Council; or (c) by
resolution of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. If dissolution
occurs per the provisions of this section, the Council must notify its
current members of its intent to dissolve and also must continue to pro-
vide services to its members for at least sixty (60) days from said notice
of intent to dissolve.
Sectioh 3. In the event of dissolution of the HCCJCC, any property
acquired as the result of the activities of the Council and any surplus
monies shall be returned consistent with the provisions of federal and
state laws in proportion to the contributions of the parties executing
Joint resolutions after the purposes of the resolution have been completed.
Section 4. The joint resolution authorizing the establishment of
the HCCJCC shall continue in effect initially for one year and shall be
conclusively deemed to have been renewed by the participants each year
thereafter until terminated in accordance with the terms of these bylaws.
ARTICLE X. AMENDMENTS
Amendments to these bylaws may be proposed by any member, member
representative or specially selected representative. Such proposed
- 13 -
amendment shall be submitted in writing to every member and representative
at least thirty (30) days prior to the time it appears on the agenda of a
Council meeting. Proposed amendments must be approved at the Council meet-
ing by the number of votes equal to a two-thirds majority of the number
of voting representatives. Before any amendment so approved by the Coun-
cil representatives shall be in force and effect, it shall be subject to
the approval of a two-thirds majority of the members, including the county
of Hennepin and the city of Minneapolis.
376q
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services/1i
SUBJECT: Nine-Mile Creek Park Improvement Project
DATE: January 7, 1977
Attached is a copy of the DRAFT Agreement between the Nine-Mile
Creek Watershed District and the City for the minimal development
contemplated with the KaerWer Gift.
Everything appears to be in order and we recommend approval where-
upon it will go to the District's Board of Managers for their
approval.
MJ:md
NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
CITY OF EDER PRAIRIE
West Branch of South Fork Project
PARTIES
The nine Mile Creek Watershed District (hereinafter "District")
and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Eden Prairie"), acting by and
through their governing bodies, enter into this cooperative agreement by
reason of and in recognition of the fact that the overall water and re-
lated land management plans for the District will be affected by the
actions of Eden Prairie in adopting or permitting land uses or programs
inconsistent with the District's overall plan objectives for the protec-
tion; maintenance and enhancement of floodplain, open space and recrea-
tional lands and the public water areas of the District.
II PROJECT
The land and water areas subject to this agreement are generally
located along the west branch of the south fork of nine Mile Creek itame-
diately west of Interstate Highway 494. These land and water areas have
potential for enhanced recreational and aesthetic uses, provided that
immediately abutting land areas are not fully developed for urban pur-
poses. The District and Eden Prairie have as an objectivethe protec-
tion of the floodplain areas and the adjacent land areas which provide
the setting for the creek.
III OBLIGATIONS OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Eden Prairie agrees to assume responsibility to undertake and to
promptly complete the ponding areas and program and to improve wildlife
?;761,
habitat as more fully shown in plans prepared by Eden Prairie attached
hereto as Exhibit A. It is anticipated that the projects will be com-
pleted by Eden Prairie during the year 1977.
IV OBLIGATIOUS OF THE DISTRICT
The District shall assume and be responsible for the payment of
50 percent of the cost of the improvement up to an amount not to exceed
$1,000.00. The payment to be made by the District to Eden Prairie is
based upon a total estimated present cost of the project of approximately
$2,500.00.
V HETHOD OF PAYMIT
Inc payment by the District in accordance with the terms of the
agreement shall be payable upon certification by Eden Prairie that the
project has been completed. It is recognized that Eden Prairie's con-
tribution towards the cost of the project nay be in the form of labor,
services, materials and equipment, provided that records shall be main-
tained by Eden Prairie to account for expenditures and contributions in
the form of labor, services, materials and equipment. In order to insure
the capability of payment of the obligations due under this agreement,
the District shall budget and set aside the monies required to meet the
obligations of this agreement.
VI SUBMISSIOR OF DEVELOPHEUT PLANS
Eden Prairie agrees to submit to the District Engineer its proposed
project plan.
-2-
31 VI
VII PUBLIC AVAILABILITY
Eden Prairie agrees that the project area will be available to all
residents of the area. The District recognizes that Eden Prairie may
adopt ordinances and regulations covering the times and types of uses
that could be made of the public areas.
VIII DURATIN
This agreement shall be binding on the parties through the period
required to complete the project or December 31, 1977, whichever date
first occurs. Additional commitments or time extensions shall require a
new greement, and in the event it is anticipated that the project will
not be completed by the end of the year 1977, Eden Prairie agrees to give
notice of such fact on or before Sept ,?mber 1, 1976, to the District, in
order that said fact can be taken into account in developing the annual
budget of the District.
This agreement shall be in force and effect upon execution by the
parties in the manner set forth in a resolution of the respective govern-
ing bodies approving the agreement and authorizing the execution of this
document.
Dated
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
And
Dated
NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
By
And
-3-
5'1 68
approved Planning Commission Minutes -2-
Nov. 8, 1976
IV. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Land Development Procedures
I. PUD Procedures
2. Zoning Procedures
3. Platting Procedures
The planner stated he feels the procedures will be of assistance to the cit
y
n
o
w
and can be reviewed if necessary after the Guide Plan Update. He said the
d
r
a
f
t
procedures attempt to make the review process more workable and readable.
Sorensen asked if the City Attorney had reviewed the drafts. The planner
r
e
p
l
i
e
d
the attorney has had some preliminary responses and would be reviewing the
m
i
n
detaia when the colawil considers the items.
Snhee inquired if the procedures need be officially adopted, or if they co
u
l
d
be accepted as procedures.
Sorensen felt they should be adopted by a resolution or more legal form as
t
h
e
y
define the obligations of the city and developer.
fivaimanquestioned if a public hearing format should be included. Discussion
follm.ed regarding the necessity and value of a format
Sundstrom suggested changes on the following pages:
P.3,D."Optional Submission of Concept and Development Stage Plans" , shoul
d
b
e
r—
P.5,1.(i c A r Tilll est it read PUD Concept and/or Development Stage . . .
Motion:
te-ii:Mirimoved, Schee seconded, to recommend to the City Council consideratio
n
o
f
approving the 3 draft procedures ( PUD, Zoning, Platting ), with the recomm
e
n
d
a
-
tions made by the commission this evening.
3%9
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES
' draft
Outline
Page
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
8
8
9
9
JO
Introduction
PUD Requirements & Procedures
A. Size
B. Definition
C. Application
D. Optional Submission of Concept
and Development Stage Plans.
E. -Staff Review
F. Referral to the Planning Commission.
G. Planning Commission Review
H. City Council Review.
I. PUD Concept and Development Plan
Presentation, Public Hearing Format
mission Requirements
A. General Requirements of PUr Concept
and Development Stage Plans.
B. Specific Plan Requirements.
Plan Proposal
PUD Development Stage Plan-Submission
Requirements
A. 'Project Identification.
B. Plan Area Identification.
C. Plan-Project Area Analysis,
D. Plan Proposal.
37 '10
INTRODUCITriN
Eden Prairie has utilized the PUD affectively since 1970
to implement the Comprehensive Guide Plan of 1968, Zoning
Ordirance../135, Subdivision Ordinance #93 and other city
The PUD in an Eden Prairie context provides the
opportunity for a creative relationship of a variety of land
uses in harmony with its natural site. To accomplish this,
the city provides in Section 11, Ordinance 135, that the
• . . "Council shall adopt , and may amend specific pro-
cedurs and requirements for submission and approval of
PUD proposals".
Eden Prairie adopted PUD Procedures on April 6, 1971 as a
guideline to the PUD process. No formal changes to these
procedures have been adopted by the City Council todate,
However, modifications to the April 6, 1971 procedures have
been added to keep the "process current".
3/71
The following is an outline of Eden Prairie's 1976 PUD Procedures:
SECTION 11, ORDINANCE 0135
Purpose
The Planned Unit Development (PUD) provision of
the ordinance is to allow variation from the
provisions of this ordiannce including setbacks,
height, lot area, width and depth, yards, etc.,
in order to:
a. Encourage more creative design and devel-
opment of land.
b. Promote variety in the physical development
pattern of the Village.
c. Concentrate open space in more usable areas
or to preserve unique natural resources of
the site.
d. Preserve and provide a more desirable envir-
onment than would be possible under strict
interpretation of. the Zoning Ordinance or
Subdivision Regulations.
A. Size
The minimum size' for PUD proposals is 25 acres, except in
the MCA (Major Center Area ) where that size is reduced.
B. Definition
I. PUD Concept Stage
The Concept Stage Plan provides the vehicle by which
the proponent may submit a plan to the city illustrating
the basic intent and general nature of the overall devel-
opment without incurring substantial cost involved in
detailed design. ihe PUD Loncept ridu - _
for public discussions regarding the impacts of alternative
plans. Approval of the Concept Plan is not intended to be
the final decision on development of the area, rather the
concept plan may change over the years as the plan is imple-
mented.
2. PUD'Development Stage Plan
The Development Stage Plan provides the specific plans
which the proponent and the city will rely upon for the
project's implementation. The City Council in approving
the Development Stage Plan will pass an ordinance rezoning
the property to the appropriate zoning district and will
take into consideration the previously approved PUD Concept
Stage Plan.
2.
3/72,
C. Applications
Applications for approval of a PUD Concept Stage and/or
Development Stage shall be filed at the office of the
Planning Director. A non-refundable application fee
of $200.00 as established by the City Council to defray'
administrative costs shall accompany each application.
A deposit established by the Planning Director shall
accompany the application. The deposit or a portion
thereof, will be refunded after final City Council
action on the proposal if the total sum is greater than
the administrative review cost, which may include, but
not be limited to:
I. consultant fees assisting in City review.
2. city staff time expended in specific develop-
ment review,
3. mailing, legal notices and other administrative
costs,
4. any other reasonable costs incurred by the City
in review of the proposal.
Full payment by the proponent of all fees and cost for City
review must be paid prior to further consideration of subse-
quent development stages.
Each application shall contain the required information
for PUD Concept or additional information and submissions
as may be prescribed by the Planning Commission.
The applicant shall provide a letter authorizing the city to erect one
or more "Land Development Signs" which identifies the site as proposed
for development. The signs will remain until the city has completed
action upon the applicant's request at which time the city will remove
the signs. The applicant does not assume responsibility for the signs
in case of vandalism or theft and only grants permission to the city
for their erection .
D. Optional Submission of Concept and Development Stage Plans.
The proponent may, at his Option, subqit Development Stage
plans for the proposed PUD simultaneously with the submission
of the Concept Plan. In such case, the proponent shall comply
With all the provisions of the city applicable to submission
of the Development Stage Plan. The Planning Commission and
Council shall oonsider such plans simultaneously and shall
grant or deny Development Stage Plan approval in accordance
with the Concept Plan approved.
E. Staff Review
The City staff will review the PUD submission and prepare
a report for the City advisory commissions and City Council
reviewing the adequacy of the data submitted, conformance
of the ruo with established city, watershed, etc., policies,
PUD's technical design aspects and a staff recommendation
for City action. Such a staff report may be written before
the first Planning Commission meeting or after one or more
meetings depending upon the complexity of the project, issues
and public explanation necessary.
3. 37-73
F. Referral to the Planning_Commission
Upon receipt of a completed application for approval of a
Concept Plan or Development Plan, the Planning Director shall
refer such application to the Planning Commission for consi-
deration at the first regular meeting of such Commission
which would allow for the.necessary publication and legal
notice requirements. In no case shall the first Planning
,Commission consideration be more than 30 days after receipt
of the application.
The first Planning Commission meeting considering the POD '
Concept and/or Development Stage Plan shall be a Public
Hearing with notice published in the official newspaper of
the City prior to the day of the hearing. Notice of the
meeting will also be mailed to affected property owners
in the project'. area.
G. Planning Commission Review
The Commission may refer the PUT) to other City advisory
commissions or other appropriate governmental review agencies
at its discretion. The Commission shall review the POD
Plans and make a recommendation to the City Council within
60 days of its first consideration unless an extension is
agreed to by the proponent.
H. City Council Review
The City Council, upon receipt of the Planning Commission's
recommendation on the POD application and written request from
the proponent, will set a public hearing to consider the Concept
and/or Development Stage application. Notice of the public
hearing will be published in the official newspaper of the
City at least 10 days prior to the day of the hearing. Notice
of the meeting will be mailed to affected property owners
before the day of the hearing.
The City Council after review of the POD request, advisory
commission recommendations, staff recommendations and public
comment, shall approve, deny, or recommend revisions or
reapplication of the Concept or Development Stage Plan.
In the event of a Concept Stage Plan , the Council shall
direct the City Attorney to draft a POD Development Agree-
ment that states the conditions upon which the PUD was
approved. The City Council shall pass a resolution approving
or denying the POD Concept Stage Plan.
The City Council in approving the POD Development Stage
Plan will direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance
amending Zoning Ordinance 135 rezoning the specific site
to the appropriate zoning district. The City Council will
then direct the City Attorney to draft a Zoning Agreement
that states the terms and conditions agreed upon by the
proponent and City. Said Zoning Agreement shall be signed
by the City and proponents prior to the second reading of
the ordinance zoning the property.
4.
3T1i1 1
I. 'PUP Concept Stage and/or Development Stage Plan Presentation
Presentations made to the Planning Commission and City
Council should be brief (1520 minutes ) covering the
major features that influenced the proposed plan, a
clear description of what is proposed and an explanation
of City decisions requested.
Visual aids such as models, slides, air photos, overhead
transparencies, large plan graphics will aid the decision
makers and interested citizens in understanding the proposed
plan. There is no substitute for visual communication in
explaining such complex issues and solutions involved in
land development decisions. Contact the Planning Director
for availability of audio visual equipment.
Public Hearing Format
Generally, the following is the Public Hearitig Format used
by the City Commissions and Council.
1. Call the opening of the Public Hearing.
2. Proponent presentation ( 15-20 minutes ).
3. Commission and/or staff reports ( 10-1S minutes).
4. Council/commission review or questions.
S. Public questions and comments:
6. Council/commission review and question proponents,
opponents, staff.
7. Council/commission close or continue the Public
Hearing and determine the necessary action.
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
Section 11.3, Ordinance 4135
The City Council shall adopt, and may amend specific
procedures and requirements fur submission an? apnroval
of PUD proposals.
A. General Requirements of PUP Concept and/or Development
Stage Plans:
1. One (1) copy of the completed Land Development
Auliratinn form and application fee most he
filed with the Planning Director a minimum of
21 days before the first Planning Commission
meeting.
2. Thirty (30) copies of the application material
shall be filed with the Planning Director a
minimum of 14 days before the first meeting with
the Planning Commission,
S.
3-ns
3: A presubmission conference w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
i
s
important to assist - the p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
i
n
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
i
n
g
•
the existing city policies
,
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
p
l
a
n
s
affecting the proposed pro
j
e
c
t
.
4. The City has found that a
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
of the proposed POD Concept
o
r
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
w
i
t
h
adjacent landowners is a p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
. sfep'in the deliel-
opment und review process.
T
h
e
c
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
w
i
l
l
assist the proponent in set
t
i
n
g
u
p
s
u
c
h
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
if desired by the proponent
.
• B. MID Concept Staee-Submissi
o
n
R
e
n
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
1. Project Identification
:
a. Ownership . . . purchased from, pur
c
h
a
s
e
d
b
y
,
nature of title, contract
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
associations or partnershi
p
s
,
e
t
c
,
.
.
.
b. Developer. . . owners or partners, n
a
t
u
r
e
o
f
business, previous experie
n
c
e
,
n
a
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
extent of participation, o
t
h
e
r
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
ventures, long or short te
r
m
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
intentions, etc. . .
c. Fiscal, Economic . . . interim and longter
m
capital sources of prospect
s
,
n
a
t
u
r
e
o
f
p
a
r
t
i
-
cipation, if any . . .
d. Development Method. . . tract or lot sale or
lease, actual construction
,
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
,
responsibility of common a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
.
e. Development Timing. . . a "critical path" mea
n
s
of description that includ
e
s
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
,
construction sales and occ
u
p
a
n
c
y
,
e
t
c
.
,
t
i
m
i
n
g
through the initial develo
p
m
e
n
t
p
e
r
i
o
d
.
f Critical Publio Decisio
n
s
.
. . highways, utilities,
parks, 'airports, etc. .
g. Additional General Proj
e
c
t
Information .
2. Plan Area Identification
a • Identify Poundaries and boundary con
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
b• Identify Project Area and other major ownership
s
.
6 .
3776
c. Regional -Relationships as pertains to the Metro
Development Guide.
d. Existing Land Use abd Occupancy.
e. Existing Transportation.
f. Existing Zoning..
g. Guide Plan or sector plan amendments.
h. General Analysis and conclusions.
3. Plan-Project Area Analysis
a. Topography, Slopes.
b. Soils. . . surface and generalizedsubsurface.
c. Vegetation . . . quality as well as location & type.
d. Water . . . streams, lakes, marsh, ponds, drainage,
subsurface, floodplains, . .
e. Photographic Analysis . . . photographs of the
site sufficient to convey its general visual
qualities and relationship to area.
f. General Natural Ecological Analysis and conclusions.
4. Plan Proposal:
a. Goals. . . specific concept plan goals to
be achieved.
b. Land Use. . .'designations, area density or
gross building area proposed. . .
c. Transportation. . . including designation of
arteriarT—F-6-1-lectors and major plan area
feeder streets, access points to arterials and
collectors, right-of-way widths, preliminary
profiles and typical cross-section proposals. .
d. Common Areas and Facilities. . . plan designa-
tion and description including ownership and
development responsibility, maintenance and
phasing.
7 .
37-0
e. Utilities Schematic. . . indicating trunk and
lateral distribution scheme for water, sewer
and power, drainage patterns and schematic struc-
tural requirements. . .
f. Mass Grading. .. plan designation of major
excavation or fill areas required to create
access or prepare sites for structures in
schematic form.
g. Community Facilities. . . including parks, public
open space, schools, churches, and other public
or quasi facilities. . .
h. Development Phases. . . indicate area and nature
of initial development, and best estimate of
future stages of development in chronological
order. . .
1. .Housing-Population Profile. . . identification
' of proposed housing inventory by type and cost.
Profile of project population by age groupings.
j. Land Use Profile. . identification of various
uses and approximate size ( square foot ), etc.
k. Transit Impact Analysis. . .general determination
of the impact of the development upon existing
transit systems and needed transit improvements
to 'Support the plan.
1. Additional Information or documentation which help
s
to illustrate the PUD Concept Stage Plan.
C. PUD Development Stage Plan - Submission Requirement
s
:
1- Project Identification:
a. Ownership. . . purchased from, purchased by, natur
e
of title, contract transfer schedule, associations
or partnerships, etc.,..
b. Developer. . . owners or partners, nature of busi
n
e
s
s
previous experience, nature and extent of partici
p
a
t
i
o
n
other concurrent ventures, long or short term inv
o
l
v
e
-
ment intention, etc....
c. Fiscal, Economic. . interim and long term capital
sources of prospects, nature of participation , if
any. . .
el. Development Method. . . tract Or lot sale or lease,
actual construction, combination, responsibility
of common areas and facilities. . .
8.
'3-177
e. Development Timing. . . a "critical path" means of
description that includes planning, approval,
construction, sales and occupancy, etc., timing through
the initial development period.
f Critical Public Decisions. . highways, utilities,
parks, airports, zoning, platting, environmental
review, etc. . .
g.
necessary to explain the unique characteristics of the
Additional General Project Information. . . as may be
project.
2. Plan Area Identification:
• IdentifY Boundaries and boundary conditions.
' b Identify Project Area and other major ownerships.
c.
Regional Relationships. . . that may be influenced
or have had signficant impact upon the project.
d Existing Land Use and OccupancK.
e. Existing Transportation Systems. . . pedestrian,
auto, etc. . .
f. Existing :Zoning.
g. Guide Plan and PUD Concept Stage Plan Framework.
h• General Analysis and conclusions.
3. Plan-Project Area Analysis
a. Topography, Slopes.
b. Soils. . . surface and subsurface conditions that
may affect construction.
C. Vegetati
•
on. . . quality as well as location.
d• Water. . . streams, lakes, marsh, ponds, drainage,
subsurface, floodplains. . .
e •
Photograp_hie Analysis. . . photographs of the site
sufficient to convey its general visual qualities
and relationship to area and proposed development.
f• General Natural Ecological Analysis and conclusions.
9,
4. Plan Proposal:
a. Development Objectives. . . as they implement the
Concept Plan's goals and specific project objectives.
b. Site Plan. . . depicting specific site layout with
roads, pathways, buildings, open space, landscaping,. -
and other site design features.
c. Grading. . . completed illustrating to 2 foot contour
intervals the site alteration necessary to complete the
planf
. d. Utility Plan. . . which illustrates the easements,
and general sewer, water, and power services to .
all uses.
e • Preliminary Architectural Drawings. . . normal
detail achieved during "design development phase"
of architectural design process ( does not include
single family detached housing).
f • Legal Instruments for Plan Implementation. .
homeowner's association documents, scenic ,
pathway, drainage, or other easements and
private documents, etc. . .
g• Housing or Land/Building Use Profile. . . computations
of gross/leaseable square footage , housing unit
breakdown to square foot, bedrooms, persons/unit,
parking requirements, etc. .
h. Zoning Classifications and/or Variation from,City
Ordinances. . . listing of zoning district changes
needed, variances from City ordinance provisions,
i. Phasing and Construction Schedule. . . explanation
of development time table including city review
through sales and occupancy.
j. Additional Information. . graphics or written
explanation that will aid in the understanding of
the project.
JO.
3-170
col raffia
•
ZONING SUMMARY
Outline
Page
Introduction
Zoning Process Outline:
A. Zoning Ordinance
B. Zoning Map
C. Initiation of Zoning Application
D. Applications
E. Optional Submission of Zoning and PUD
or Preliminary Plat
F. Staff Review
G. Referral to Planning Commission
H. Planning Commission Review
I. City Council Review
Reapplication
K. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council
L. Public Presentation
Submission Requirements:
A. General Requirements
B. Specific Plan Requirements
C. Site Area Analysis
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
6
6
6
7
MI
INTRODUCTION
• Eden Prairie's Zoning Ordinance #135, adopted in 1969, is
quite different from most City zoning codes. The ordinance
relys upon interpretation of most conditions of the ordinance.
For example, specific uses within each zone are not listed,
rather general descriptions of the objectives to be achieved
by land use is included. Ordinance #135 is an exclusive
zoning district concept differing from many which allow all
lesser uses within each higher zone. For example, within
commercial or industrial districts , residential uses are
not allowed. •
Zoning in Eden Prairie is used . . . "to assist in the imple-
mentation of the City of Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan which this Ordinance is based . . . " Sectionl, Subd.
1.2 (2).
Unlike many communities Eden Prairie did not "pre-zone"
large areas to a specific use such as single family R1 or
Industrial, instead most undeveloped property was zoned to
the Rural District. The purpose of the Rural District
included permitting certain agricultural uses and. . .
To prevent premature urban develop-
ment of certain lands which eventually
will be appropriate for urban uses
until the installation of drainage works,
streets, utilities and community facilities
and the ability to objectively determine
and project appropriate land use patterns
makes orderly development possible.
Application to a specific urban zoning
district is timed to be in sequence with
public utility services and construction
of the project. "
1.
31 7),
ZONING PROCESS OUTLINE
A. Zoning Ordinance
Ordinance #135 is the document in which the city's zoning
process is discussed in detail. Copies of : a) Ordinance
#135,b) Appendix A - legal descriptions of all property
zoned, c) Ordinance #141 replaces Sections 1213 of
Ordinance 5135 Parking G Loading, d) Ordinance #261 replaces
Section 14 Signs, e) Ordinance #276 Floodplain Ordinance,
and f) Ordinance 93 Subdivision Ordinance arc reference
documents necessary to prepare a zoning application. Copies
may be obtained from the City Hall .
B. Zoning Map
The City Zoning Map may be purchased from the City Hall.
The Zoning Map is periodically updated, that revision date
is shown on the lower edge of the map. For official zoning
district boundaries or most current zoning information , the
legal descriptions contained in Appendix A and subsequent
zoning ordinances are the most accurate source.
C. Initiation of Zoning Application (Subd. 19.2, Ord.#135)
" An amendment to a zoning ordinance may
be initiated by the City Council, the
Planning Commission or by petition of
affected owners"
A zoning ordinance change may also be
part of a PUD development stage appli-
cation. " (refer to PUD Procedures,
dated
D. Applications
Applications for 'approval of a zoning district change shall be
filed at the office of the Planning Director. A non-refundable
application fee of $200.00 as established by the City Council
to defray administrative costs shall accompany each application.
A deposit established by the Planning Director shall accompany
the application. The dcsposit or a portion thereof, will be
refunded after final City Council action on the proposal
if the total sum is greater than the administrative review
. cost, which may include, but not be limited to:
1. consultant fees assisting in City review.
2. City staff time expended in specific
development review.
2.
31Z 3
3. mailing, legal notices and other adminis-
trative costs.
4. any other reasonable costs incurred by
the city in review of the proposal.
Full payment by the proponent of all fees and cost for city
review must be paid prior to further city consideration.
Each application shall contain the required information for
Zoning District change or additional information and sub-
missions as may be prescribed by the Planning Commission.
The applicant shall provide a letter authorizing the city to erect one
or more "Land Development Signs" which idnetifies the site as proposed
for development. The signs will remain until the city has completed
action upon the applicant's request at which time the city will remove
the signs. The applicant does not assume responsibility for the signs
in case of vandalism or theft and only grants permission to the city
for their erection.
E. Optional Submission of Zoning and PUT) or Preliminary Plat
The proponent may, jut his option, submit PUT) Concept Stage
and/or preliminary plat simultaneously with the submission
with all the provisions of the city applicable to submission
of each separate action. The Planning Commission and Council
shall consider such request simultaneously and shall grant or
deny the applications.
F. staff Review
The city staff will review the zoning application and prepare
a report for the city advisory commissions and City Council
reviewing the adequacy of the data submitted, conformance
of the zoning with established city, watershed, etc., policies,
project's technical design aspects and a staff recommendation
for City action . Such a staff report may be written before
the first Planning Commission meeting or after one or more
meetings depending upon the complexity of the project, issues
and public explanation necessary.
G. Referral to the Planning Commission
Upon receipt of a complete zoning district change application,
the Planning Director shall refer such application to the
Planning Commission for consideration at the first regular
meeting of such commission which would allow for the legal
publication and notice requirements. In no case shall the
first Planning Commission consideration be More than 30 days
after receipt of the application.
The first Planning Commission meeting considering the zoning
district change shall be a public hearing with noticepublished
in the official newspaper of the city prior to the day of
the bearing. Notice of the meeting will also be mailed to
affected property owners in the project area at least S days
prior to the meeting. 71q
H. Planning Commission Review
The Commission may refer the Zoning Application to other City .
advisory commissions or other appropriate governmental review
agencies at its descret ion. The Commission shall review the
plabs and make a recommendation to the City Council within
60 days of its first consideration unless an extension is
agreed to by the proponents.
i. City Council Review
The City Council upon receipt of the Planning Commission's
recommendation on the zoning application and written request
from the proponent, will set a public hearing to consider
the application. Notice of thepublic hearing will be published
in the official newspaper of the city at least 10 days prior
to the day of the hearing. Notice of the meeting will be
mailed to affected property owners at least 10 days prior to
the day of the public hearing.
TheCity Council after review of the zoning request, advisory
commission recommendations -, staff recommendations and public
comment, may approve(by a 2/3 -two thirds-vote ,f council
. members), deny, Or recommend revisions or reppplication.
The City Council in approving a zoning district change will
direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance amending
Zoning Ordinance if155 rezoning the specific site to the
appropriate zoning district . The City Council will then
direct the City Attorney to draft a Zoning Agreement that
states the terms and conditions agreed upon by the proponent
and city. Said Zoning Agreement shall be signed by the city
and proponents prior to the second reading of the ordinance
zoning the property.
J. Reapplication
No application for the same or substantially the same change
shall be made within one (1) year from the date of City
Council denial.
K. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council
Some zoning plans will be required to prepare an Environmental
Assessment worksheet as required by the rlinnesota Environmental Quality
Council Rules and Regulations ( Minn.Reg. DEQC 21 ) pursuant
to the Environmental Policy Act of 1973. The Planning Director
will assist the proponent in such a determination as to the
need for an Environmental Assessment.
3IE
L. Public Presentation
Presentations made to the Planning Commission and City Council
should be brief (10-20 minutes) covering the major features
that influenced the proposed plan, a clear description of
what is proposed and an explanation of city decisions requested.
Visual aids such as: models, slides, air photos, overhead
transparencies, large plan graphics will aid the decision
makers and interested citizens in understanding the proposed
plan. There is no substitute for visual communication in
explaining such complex issues and solutions involved in
land development decisions. Contact the Planning Director
for use of audio visual equipment.
Generally, the following is the Public Hearing Format used
by the City Commissions and Council:
1. Call the opening of the Public Hearing.
2. Proponent presentation (15-20 minutes ).
3. Commission and/or staff reports (10-15 minutes).
4. Council/commission review or questions.
5. Public questions and comments.
6. Council/commission review and question proponents,
opponents, staff.
7. Council/commission close or continue the Public
Hearing and determine the necessary action.
5.
3') G.
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
A. General Requirements f
o
r
Z
o
n
i
n
g
p
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
P
l
a
n
s
:
1. One (1) copy of the compl
e
t
e
d
L
a
n
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Application form and appl
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
e
e
m
u
s
t
b
e
f
i
l
e
d
• with the Planning Directo
r
a
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
o
f
2
1
d
a
y
s
before the first Planning
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
.
2. Thirty (30) copies of the
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
shall be filed with the Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
a
minimum of 14 days before
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
the Planning Commission,
3. A presubmission conferenc
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
i
s
important to assist the p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
i
n
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
i
n
g
the existing city policie
s
,
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
p
l
a
n
s
affecting the proposed pro
j
e
c
t
.
4. The city has found that pr
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
of a proposed zoning chan
g
e
w
i
t
h
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
l
a
n
d
o
w
n
e
r
s
is a positive step in the
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
'
process. The city staff w
i
l
l
a
s
s
i
s
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
in setting up such meetin
g
s
i
f
d
e
s
i
r
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
proponent.
Specific Plan. Requirement
s
1. Ownership. . . purchased
f
r
o
m
,
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
d
b
y
,
n
a
t
u
r
e
of title, contract', transf
e
r
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
,
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
or partnerships, 'etc. . .
•
4.4
2. 'Developer. . . owners or.
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
,
n
a
t
u
r
e
o
f
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
previous experience, natu
r
e
a
n
d
e
x
t
e
n
t
o
f
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
-
ton other concurrent vent
u
r
e
s
,
l
o
n
g
o
r
s
h
o
r
t
t
e
r
m
involvement intention, etc
.
.
3. Fiscal, Economic. . . int
e
r
i
m
a
n
d
l
o
n
g
t
e
r
m
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
sources of prospects, natu
r
e
o
f
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
,
i
f
.any. .
4. Development Method. . . tr
a
c
t
o
r
l
o
t
s
a
l
e
o
r
l
e
a
s
e
,
actual construction , com
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
,
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
of common areas and facili
t
i
e
s
.
.
.
S. Identify Boundaries and
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
6. Identify Project Area and
o
t
h
e
r
m
a
j
o
r
o
w
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
.
7. Regional Relationships tha
t
m
a
y
b
e
i
n
f
l
u
e
n
c
e
d
Or have had signficant impact
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
8. Existing Land Use and Occu
p
a
n
c
y
.
6.
3'7 7'1
9. Existing Transportation Systems. . . pedestrian,
auto, etc. . . . .
10. Existing Zonings.
11. City Guide Plan Framework,
12. Critical Public Decisions. . . highways, utilities,
parks, airports, zoning, platting, environmental
review, etc. . .
13. .Additional General Project Information. . . as may
be necessary to explain the unique characteristics
of the project.
C. Site Area Analysis
1. Development Objectives.—
2. Site Plan. . . depicting specific site layout with
roads, patnways, buildings, open space, landscaping,
and other sit( design features.
3. Grading. . . completed illustrating to 2 foot
contour intervals the site alteration necessary
to complete the plan.
4. Utility Plan ... . which illustrates the easements,
and general sewer, water, and power services to
all uses.
S. Preliminary Architectural Drawings.. . . normal
detail achieved during "design development phase"
of architectural design process ( does not .include
single family detached housing ).
6. Legal Iastruments for Plan Implcmentation. . .
homeowner's association documents, scenic pathway,
drainage, or other easements and private documents,
etc . ., .
7. Housing or Land/Building Use Profile. . . computations
of gross/12aseable square footage, housing unit break-
down to square foot, bedrooms, persons/unit parking
requirements, etc. .
7 .
3771
8. Zoning Classification and/or Variations from City
Ordinances. . . Fisting of zoning district changes
needed, variances from city ordinance provisions,
etc
9. Phasing and Construction Schedule. . . explanation
of development time table including city review
through sales and occupancy.
10. Additional Information . . . graphics or written
explanation that will aid in the understanding of
the project.
8.
370
draLA
PRELIMINARY PLAT PROCEDURES
Out
Page
1
Introduction
2 A. City Review Procedure
2
I. Review
2
2. Filing
2
3. Filing Fee
2b
4. Nearing
3 S. Report to Council.
3 6. City Council Action
3'
B. Data for Preliminary Plan
3
1. Identification & Description
4 ;. 2. Existing Conditions
5 .3. Subdivision Design Features
6 4. Other Information
6 C. Ordinance N332-Park & Open Space
3190
INTRODUCTION
The procedures and requirements for preliminary platting are
listed in Ordinance #93, adopted February 28, 1967. Modifi-
cations to Ordinance #93 have been made by the City Council
by amendments or new ordinances while other administrative
changes have streamlined procedures.
Preliminary plats are prepared by a registered engineer and
are reviewed by the city and public. The preliminary plat
is as the name implies, it proceeds the final plat and allows
for changes to be made before the detailed engineering
design is determined.
1.
A. City Review Procedure:
Procedure: Before subdividing any tract .of land
the subdivider shall submit a preliminary plat of
the subdivision for approval of the Planning Com-
mission and City Council in the following manner:
Submission:
(1) Review. The preliminary plat shall be submitted
to the Planning Director who shall review same
to ascertain if said plat with the
regulations as herein set forth. If the Planning
Director finds the material sufficient and in
conformance, the plat shall be given a file
number and scheduled for the Planning Commission's
agenda.
(2) Filing. thirty (30) copies of the proposed plat
shall be filed with the Planning Director. The
required filing fee shall be paid and any neces-
sary applications for variances from the provi-
sions of this ordinance and other applicable
city ordinances, shall be filed before the proposed
plat shall be considered officially filed.
The applicant shall provide a letter authorizing the city to erect
one or more "Land Development Signs" which identifies the site as
proposed for development. The signs will remain until the city has
completed action upon the applicant's request at which time the city
will remove the sign(s). The applicant does not assume responsibility
for the signs in case of vandalism or theft and only grants permission
to the city for their erection.
(3) Filing Fee. The fee to be paid for filing an
application shall be twenty-five dollars ($25.00),
plus one dollar ($1.00) for each lot or
dollars ( ) per acre on non-residentiaf -
property.
(4) Dearing. Within thirty days (30) from the date of
filing, the Planning Director shall:
(a) Set a public hearing for the next regular
meeting of the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission shall conduct the
hearing and report upon findings and make
recommendations to the City Council. Notice
of said hearing shall be published in the
official newspaper at least seven(7) days
prior to the hearing.
Refer one (1) copy of the preliminary plat to
each member of the Planning Commission for
their examination and report. The City
Engineer and Planning Director shall provide
the Planning Commission a copy of their
report (a) at least 9 days prior to the hearing.
(b)
n9a 2.
(c) Public Hearing Format
Generally the following is the Public Hearing Format used by
the City Commissions and Council.
1. Call the opening of the public hearing.
2. Proponent presentation ( 15-20 minutes ).
3. Commission and/or staff reports ( 10-15 minutes ).
4. Council/commission review or questions.
5. Public questions and comments.
6. Council/commission close or continue public
hearing and determine the necessary action.
2b.
3793
(5) Report to Council. The Planning Commission shall
make a report to the City Council within 21 days
following the public hearing.
(6) City Council Action:
(a) The Council shall act upon the preliminary
plat within one hundred and twenty (120)
days of the date on which it was officially
filed . If the report of the Planning Com-
mission has not been received in time to
meet this requirement, the Council may act
on the preliminary plat without such report.
(b) If the preliminary plat is not approved by
the City Council, the reasons for such action
shall be recorded in the proceedings of the
Council and transmitted to the applicant .
If the preliminary plat is approved, such a
approval shall not constitute final accep-
tance of the subdivision, but the general
*acceptance of the layout. Subsequent approval
will be required of the engineering proposals
and other features and requirements as speci-
fied by this Ordinance to be indicated on the
final plat. The City Council may require
. such revisions in the preliminary plat and final
':plat as it deems necessary for the health,
safety, general welfare and convenience of
the City of Eden Prairie.
(c) The City Council shall direct the City Attorney
to prepare a resolution stating the council's
action and reasons for approval or denial of
the preliminary plat application.
B. Data for Preliminary Plat: The preliminary plat
shall be clearly and legibly drawn at a scale approved
by the City Engineer but not less than 1"=50 feet.
The preliminary plat of the proposed subdivision shall
contain or have attached thereto the following infor-
mation:
1 Identification and Description:
(a) Proposed name of subdivision, which name shall
not duplicate or be alike in pronunciation of the
name of any plat theretofore recorded in the
County.
(b) Legal description of property according to the
records in the office of the Register of Deeds.
3.
(e) Name and addresses of the owner, owner's
agent, subdivider, surveyor and designer
of the plat.
(d) Graphic scale.
(e) North Point.
(f) Date of preparation.
2. Existing Conditions:
(a) Boundary line survey of proposed subdivision
clearly indicated.
(b) Existing zoning classifications.
(c) Total acreage.
(d) -Shown on county half-section maps (1".200'
scale) the location, widths, and names of
proposed streets or other public ways, parks
and other public lands, easements, and sec-
tion and corporate lines within the preliminary
plat and to a distance one hundred (100')
feet beyond the boundary line.
(e) Location and size both public and private, of
existing sewers, water mains, culverts or other
underground facilities within the preliminary
plat area and to a distance of one hundred
(100') feet beyond. Such data as grades,
invert elevations • and locations of catch
basins, manholes, and hydrants shall also
be shown.
(f) Boundary lines of adjoining unsubdivided oi
subdivided land, within one hundred (100')
feet identifying by name and ownership.
(g). Topographic data, including contours at
vertical intervals of not more than two
feet (2') , except where the horizaontal
contour interval is one hundred feet (100')
or more , a one foot (1') vertical interval
shall be shown. Water courses, marshes,
wooded areas, rock outcrops, power transmission
policies and lines, and other significant
features shall also be shown.
(h) Two (2) copies of all proposed private covenants'.
(i) At least two (2) soil borings shall be required
by the City Engineer.
( j) At least two (2) percolation tests shall be
required by the City Engineer where appropriate.
3795
4.
3 • Subdivision Design Features:
(a) Layout of proposed streets, including proposed
roads according to.City thoroughfare plans,
showing right-of-way widths and proposed names
of streets. The name of any street heretofore
used in the City or its environs shall not be
used unless the proposed street is an extension
of an already named street, in which event the
name shall he used. The City Engineer will review
street naming with applicant.
(b) Location of widths or proposed alleys, pedestrian
ways and utility easements.
(c) Typical cross-sections of proposed improvements
upon streets and alleys, together with an indica-
tion as to the method of disposing of the proposed
storm water runoff.
(d) Approximate center line gradients of proposed
streets . and alleys.
(e) Location, size and approximate gradient of proposed
sewer lines and water mains.
(f) Layout, numbers and preliminary dimensions of lots
and blocks, and building setback lines.
(g) Areas, other than streets, alleys, pedestrian
ways and utility easements, intended to be dedicated
or reserved for public use, including the size of
such area or areas in acres.
(h) Whenever a lot proposed for platting is intended
or large enough for future platting, a te:.tative
.plan for the future subdivision of the entire
tract shall be submitted to the Planning Commission.
(i) No plan will be approved for a subdivision which
covers an area subject to periodic flooding, or
which contains extremely poor drainage facilities
and which would make adequate drainage of the
streets and lots impossible, unless the subdivider
agrees to make improvements which will, in the
opinion of the City Engineer, Make the area com-
pletely safe for occupancy, and provide adequate
street and lot drainage.
The City Flood Plain Zone and open space system plans
adopted hy the Council will be used in evaluating the
.plat and the plat's conformance with those ordinances
and plans shall he reported to the Planning Commission
and City Council by the Engineer and Planning Director. .
5.
77`)10
Residential Units
Per Acre .
Single Family Detached
All other residential uses
Commercial/Office/Industrial Uses
Pee per Unit
$ 275
$ 200
$1,200/acre 3'799
( j) The preliminary plat shall be in conformance
with the PUD and/or Zoning Agreement for the
• subject site. The Planning Director shall
provide the applicant with copies of any agreement
stating conditions affecting the subject site.
Such an agreement may provide for variances or
special conditions for utilization of the site.
4. Other Information:
(a) Statement of the proposed use of lots stating
type of buildings with number of proposed dwelling
units, type of business or industry so as to
reveal the effect of the development on traffic;
fire hazards or congestion of population.
(b) Water supply source.
(c) Provisions for sewage disposal, drainage and
flood control.
(d) Notation made as to the installation of curb and
gutter, sidewalks, boulevard improvements 0 and
the location of street trees.
(e) Proposed protective covenants or deed restrictions.
(f) Location of proposed street lights, and easements,
and ;he utilities of electricity, gas and tele-
phone. All such utilities are to be underground.
C. Ordinance #332, Park and Open Space
Adopted June 8, 1976, Amending Section 11, Ordinance
4193 Relating to Parks, Playgrounds, Public Open
Space, storm water holding areas or ponds.
Section 11:
Subd. 1. Parks, Playgrounds, Public Open Space, Storm Wate
r
lioldijig Areas or Ponds ...
The owner or owners of land being subdivided for residenti
a
l
,
commercial, industrial or other uses, or as a planned unit
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
-
ment which includes residential, commercial and industria
l
u
s
e
s
,
or any combination thereof shall dedicate a reasonable po
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
each proposed subdivision to the public for public use as
p
a
r
k
s
,
playgrounds, public open space or storm water holding are
a
s
o
r
p
o
n
d
s
;
or at the city's option, the subdivider shall contribute a
n
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
amount in cash based on the following schedule which is h
e
r
e
b
y
determined to be the fair market value of the undeveloped
l
a
n
d
.
Subd. 2. That any money received hereunder shall be placed .
in a special fund by the City and used only for the acquisition
of land for parks, playgrounds, public open spaces, storm water
holding areas or ponds, development of existing park and playgroun
d
sites, public open space and storm water holding areas or ponds
and debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for
such public purposes.
Subd. 3. In ascertaining the amount of money and/or land
dedication required herein to be dedicated to the public for public
use, the City may take into consideration the open space, park,
recreational common areas and facilities which the subdivider has
provided for the exclusive use of the residents of the subdivision.
Subd. 4. Payments required by Subdivision I may, at the
.Council's discretion, be deferred until such time as a building
permit is issued for the property involved.
7.
319?
January 18, 1977
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE .
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-7
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A
FEASIBILITY REPORT ON PROJECT I.C. 51-298
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve:
I.C. 51-298, Storm sewer and street improvements
near T.H. 5 and County Rd. 4
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of
the improvements pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer
for study with the assistance of Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc.,
and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the
City council with all convenient speed, advising the Council in a prelimi-
nary way as to the scope, cost, assessment and feasibility of the proposed
improvements.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
3/99
MEMO
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
Roger Ulstad, City Manager
Carl Jullie, City Engineer
January 13, 1977
Petition for Storm Sewer and Street Improvements
T.H.5/Co. Rd. 4 Area
I.C. 51-298
New petitions (copy attached) have been received requesting storm sewer
improvements in the vicinity of the northeast quadrant of County Rd. 4
and Trunk Highway 5. The drainage area affected is outlined in red on
the attached location map. Also, a petition has been received for com-
pletion of Ontario Boulevard (Westgate Boulevard) down to T.H. 5.
In November of 1975, a similar petition was received and the Council
ordered a feasibility study, but the study was to proceed only if the •
petitioners would agree to pay for the cost of the study if the im-
provements wer& not ordered following a public bering. The petition-
er (D. Goryeal d e cided not to 1...rsue the project at that time, bat rather
made arrantcl.etts to excavate a ditch tc the cast in order to
lower the pond level on his property, which had been unceasing yearly
because the old drain tile systeM became inoperative. Now, the property
owners to the cast (R. H. Gardner) desires to finish the street (Ontario
Boulevard) and build on more of the platted lots in the East Westgate
Addition. The storm sewer part now being petitioned must be installed
before that street can be finished. Mr. Gonyea also wants to develop.his
property in the near future and desires to have the required drainage
pond constructed on his property.
As noted on the drawing, approximately 60 single family homeowners in the
School Addition, Kirk Meadows and Westgate Additions will be involved in
the storm sewer project. Also, drainage from the new Prairie Village Mall
and the Immanuel Lutheran Church flows to the pond area and proposed storm
sewer system.
A very preliminary estimate of the cost of the improvements is $200,000. A
feasibility report would of course provide the preliminary design, a detailed
cost estimate and proposed assessment rates. The estimated cost for the
feasibility study is $5,000.
. It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 77-7 and pro-
ceed with the feasibility study as petitioned,
CjJ:kh
Attachment
31.06
Names of Petitioners
(l'ost Be Prc ,pertv Cwners)
1
C
(* :) ('
• t.
Tntercontinenal Engine'ering & vev. Co.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,'MINNEBOTA
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
To The Eden Prairie City Council:
The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City
Council to consider making the following described improvements(s):
(General Location)
-Sami,e•ar-y-Secter
441.7.te.44w4a
ether
St:cet ;l-(:5E, or Or
lygal i")iption of
Scrvc-i
Lots 30 thru 39, Block 4
1.7stcato
Lots 24 thru 27, 310ck 7
:Ar.3diticn
Lots 15 t:ru 23, '1lock 7
47 ,7,stcate Aidition •
Prairie Villase Mall - •i; Prairie Village Yall
-
A , 14 66 r(' ALF (t -V.1.41 9,„y
(For City Use)
• Date Received
Project No.
Council Consideration
In Ontarlo (Westgate Boulevard and such other ,
X Ctorm Sewer property as required for planned drainage-district
to allow construction of-Ontario Boulevard from
.t-tk,a,:tc-4 -,•:=i1 T.H.5 to Project 51-292 ,
3Z01
Names of Petitioners
(Must Be Property Owners)
j-7-1) . .
Intercentiiisiitii -T:ne:::771:::1::.--i -ri:4--et.r.-'-t.
By: :-1._-..,..
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
To The Eden Prairie City Council:
The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City
Council to consider making the following described improvements(s):
(General Location)
Sanitary Sower
If-required in Ontar1V -(WUStgate b.CVd.)
X waterraain from T.H.5 to Project 51-292 including Cul-de-Sac
In Ontario -rWeslgate) HEnTllyara & blocks
X Storm Sewer 4 & 7 Westgate Addition
Ontario (Westgate).-13-67-11-diard tram T .H.5
X .Stu'.. Povij to Project 51-292 including Cul-de-Sac
Other
Street Acklrucr Cr Other
Legal Pc..s:7ripti.7.r) of
prcTer:y_to be .Fcrved
Lots 3-6- thru 39, Block 4
stst ,P.ddition
Lots 24 thru 2 7 ,
Lots 15 thru 23, Block -r-
W:'.stcata Aiiition
(For City Use)
Date Received
Project No.
Council Consideration
?)-10.
January 18, 1977
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 77-6
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
1. A public hearing shall be held on the 15th day of February, 1977, at
7:00 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Hall to consider the vacation of
Earl Drive and the drainage and utility easements in Topview Acres
1st Addition.
2. The City Clerk shall give proper legal notice of such hearing as
required by law. (Two weeks published and posted notice).
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
!;1'11E2IN • SiEWARI WILDING
:n 42r. NICLI 1,r1 AVI.N ,.:1: • MINNEAPOLIS. MINNL`.;OTA 5',I21 • 81Z/81i6-36(.4
\I WS
IFIV4F1
ANN STF.1 December 1, 1976
IMANACI R.
ZYG PHILLIP
Honoratle Wolfrang Fenzel, Mayor
6932 Parerry Lane
ieri Prairie, Yinnesota 55343
proposed -roposed Project -
Stewart Hirhlands
::ar Y.sycr Pennel:
::-. 7%:Ez•::'.:- riEht, Deoember 7, we of Stewart Iroperties an:1 our can-
inc frm, Harry L. Johnson Companies, are ocheduaed to Lppeetr
1 ,:fcre
the L ..:En "..rairie City Couroil to ask for apprcv .,1 of our
ap7licaton to rc -zone our 20.4 acres from Rural to it.E 6.5 zoninc,
which falls within the 1968 Ccmprehcnsive Guide Plan. (This
7.7m.:y is r,cw ";:nown as Top View Acres, 1st .LCCition.)
.:e f ..;.:.ther i-rt-, aF:r for preliminary plat approval WITH NO VA -r.IANCES.
ee: vacr:tion of :arl Prve so that the proposed plat N
(
wt .::: a diff&rent street 'rraylierr..ent.
t .
ff r:.or7,r i0 c ..::,.r ::-:I.t,r 13 1,rc-
in*.h7:,r.::-Infr;„- Coszion, th:ls wa3 cl;:c7_.:Id a r.taL,c.nable
t, ::-.aF..Ich as o'ot,-plan cans for cc:,:raf.:.teiy resf:t;:ntfal t;:aze
cf 17r.a Ir:o.l-rty..,n:-: it saefros likely, from rocent comments, tnat the
ad may be a considerable distance from our property.
attacing, a copy of a letter from Bailey Seida, planner for
.TOnson Cc:npanis, our consultants, and this outlines quite
th:.rcui.hly the steps we took prior to our re-submittal to the Planning
omnisliOn on Noventer 8, 1976, at which meeting our proposal was
reccmenisd for atproval by the City Council on a 4-to-1 vote.
We respectfully rcquest that, should there be objections which we
:re unable to solve at the meeting on December 7, that we be informed
of these objections So that we may have an opportunity to try to
respond to them or to make whatever changes are necessary in order to
receive approval.
We ask that, in the event there are outstanding and unresolved questions
or problems in the mind of any member of the Council, that the Council
1),.eraiur ,:. for 25 yenrs. of 11Tf3e AM M ftereo Aritat ft eio
nuS
not take action on December 7 and that the Public Hearing he
Continued over to the next regularly scheduled Council meeting
so that we may avoid the delays and time consuming cots for the
City a:.d for ourselves in the re-publication processes.
We sincerely hope that we may resolve any and all questions at the
December 7 meeting and that our project will rtceive appro-:al of
Council so that we :Lay proceed to plan for spring construction.
ne thanl; you in advanc for each and every courtc.•iy and coeration
er.-.enc::ed to us in the weighing of our proposal.
With kindest regards,
4
1
kL;--
'
cc: Ooan Meyers, Sidney Pauly, Billy Bye, Tim Pierce
3Vo
January 7, 1977
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
payroll
12-31 payroll 6,288.19
Donations withheld 48.92
Services-Mitchell Lake-Pemtom
and Westgate E. Add. 476.00
Reimburse fund 41.32
Workshop registration for
(476.00:7
4,876.82 '
6,064.67 1
Building dept. inspectors 180.00
01-07-77 9501 CRIMINAL LAW SEMINAR Seminar on criminal law for
Public Safety dept. 25.00
9504 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment parts 188.33
9505 EARL ANDERSEN Supplies-Park Maint. 10.12
9506 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. Dues-Carl Jullie 100.00
9507 BATTERY WAREHOUSE SERVICE Equipment parts 80.16
9508 BROWN PHOTO Photo finishing-Public Safety 14.19
9509 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO. Desk signs-Public Safety 21.00
9510 CITY OF EDINA Water samples 18.00
9511 JOHN CONLEY Prisoners meals 8.37
9512 CARGILL SALT Deicing salt 244.73
9513 DWYER SALES CO. Tools-Water dept. 85.15
9514 ESS BROTHERS & SONS Brate-Water dept. 38.00
9515 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL City share of Community Education
and battery cables for Fire dept. 4,471.17
9516 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY First aid kits-Park Maint. 58.14
9517 CHRIS ENGER Minn. registration fee 15.00
9518 FRANZ ENGINEERING REPRODUCTIONS Service-Engineering dept. 111.72
9519 FORSTNER FIRE APPARATUS Equipment parts 105.16
9520 GROUP HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance for Jan. 359.86
9521 CHARLES GOULD Refund overpayment on kennel
license 12.00
9522 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE Registration for Carl Jullie 30.00
9523 GUY'S AUTO SUPPLY Equipment parts 4.05
9524 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS Radio repairs-Fire dept. 84.85
9525 GUNNAR ELECTRIC COMPANY Services-Park dept. Maint. and
development 5,485.50
9526 GMC TRUCK Carbarator 87.50
9527 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. Table-Public Safety dept. 50.89
9528 HOT FISH SHOP OF ANOKA Refund for investigation fee for
liquor license 1,500.00
9529 DIANNE HANSON Mileage 6.60
9530 HENNEPIN COUNTY Equipment rental-Public Safety and
Fire dept. 1,704.80
9531 JACK HACKING Expenses 36.00
3'11,0 1
9502 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
12-23-76 3330 VOID OUT CHECK
12-29-76 3360 STATE OF MINNESOTA Taxes withheld for December
3361 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 12-24 and 12-31
336? PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employers contribution and
ASSN. employees withheld 12-24 and
3363 UNITED WAY
01-07-77 3364 BRAUN ENGINEERING
01-04-77 9501 PETTY CASH
January 7, 1977
69.56
10.00
101.10
143.85
189.10
454.00
102.40
195.00
200.00
272.98
155.80
1,313.00
12.92
25.00
45.00
103.85
13,076.47
1,500.00
71.00
509.25
629.77
1,302.00
100.00
433.33
33.00
30.00
2,812.82
93.25
2.00
9.90
46.40
67.74
45.00
327.46
64.34
480.38
24.84
22.01
100.00
2.00
21.61
150.80
01-07-77 9532 HOPKINS DODGE, INC.
9533 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
ASSESSING OFFICERS
9534 MARTY JESSEN
9535 JAMES JENSEN
9536 JONES CHEMICALS, INC.
9537 HARRY JOHNSON COMPANIES, INC.
9538 CARL JULLIE
9539 ELIZABETH JOHNSON
9540 JANSKI AND GIBSON
9541 KARULF HARDWARE
9542 KRAMER'S HARDWARE
9543 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
9544 JOHN LATZKE
9545 MATT'S AUTO SERVICE
9546 METRO PRINTING, INC.
9547 ROBERT MARTZ
9548 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL
COMMISSION
9549 MAYVIEW RADIO
9550 3M BUSINESS PRODUCTS
9551 METROPOLITAN ANIMAL PATROL
9552 MINNEGASCO
9553 MINNESOTA TREE, INC.
9554 NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK Assn.
9555 NORTHWESTERN BELL
9556 PITNEY BOWES
9557 J. C. PENNY
9558 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN
9559 PEPSI-COLA
9560 JOEL SCHAUBERT
9561 SIR KNIGHT CLEANERS
9562 SCHRER BROTHERS LUMBER
9563 ED SORENSEN
9564 DONNA STANLEY
9565 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES, INC.
9566 ST. PAUL STAMP WORKS, INC.
9567 GORDON SMITH CO.
9568 SEELYE PLASTICS, INC.
9569 TOWN'S EDGE FORD, INC.
9570 ROGER ULSTAD
9571 THE UPPER MIDWEST COUNCIL
9572 SANDY WERTS
9573 WILCOX PAPER CO.
9574 WATER PRODUCTS CO.
9575 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE
9576 STEVE GEIGER
9577 DONNA HYATT
9578 ALLEN LARSON
9579 SUSAN ANDERSON
9580 JACK HACKING
9581 DANIEL BETLOCK
Equipment parts
Membership dues-Robert Martz
Dec. expenses
Services and expenses for work
on model of Round Lake Park
Chlorine-Water dept.
Services-Testiment Church
Dec. expenses
Dec. services
Services-Park dept.
Supplies
Supplies
Membership dues
Mileage
Towing service
Service-Public Safety dept.
Dec. expenses
January sewer charges
Radios
Copy machine-Public Safety
Dec. services
Service
Pick up of diseased trees
Dues-Park and Rec. Commission
Service
Postage meter
Speedometer test-Public Safety
Employees insurance for Jan.
Employees pop
Refund on snowmobile safety class
Service-Public Safety dept.
Materials-Old shop
Dec. expenses and mileage
Dec. services
Portable restrooms-Park dept.
Dog tags
Fuel, parts and garage supplies
Water sample lines-Water dept.
Equipment repair service
January expenses
Books-Community services
Dec. expenses
Xerox paper
Meters and repair parts-Water dept. 627.72
Employees insurance for Jan. 606.50
Uniform allowance 275.00
Uniform allowance 50.00
Uniform allowance 150.00
Uniform'allowance 50.00
Uniform allowance 275.00
Uniform allowance 275.00
ii
January 7, 1977
01-07-77 9582 JOYCE NOLTE
9583 THOMAS BROWN
9584 JAMES MATSON
9585 KEITH WALL
9586 BILL BLAKE
9587 CURTIS OBERLANDER
9588 ROGER DANIELSKI
9589 ROBERT TYSON
9590 LES BRIDGER
9591 JAMES CLARK
9592 NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK
ASSN.
Uniform allowance
Uniform allowance
Uniform allowance
Uniform allowance
Uniform allowance
Uniform allowance
Uniform allowance
Uniform allowance
Uniform allowance
Uniform allowance
Dues for Marty Jessen
TOTAL
275.00
275.00
275.00
275.00
275.00
275.00
275.00
275.00
275.00
275.00
50.00
62,914.36
?,209