HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 12/14/1976EVEN PHAIRIE CITY rplimm
EFSOAY, DECEMBER 14, 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Dye, Sidnuy
Pauly, Juan Meyers and Tim Pierce
City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Flro ,]
Director John Frane; Director of Com4ounity
Services Marty Jcssen; Engineer Carl
Joyce Provo, Recording Secretet.y
lInCATION PLEDGE OE ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPPOYAL OF AGFNDA. AND OTHER ITEMS OF .BUS,INESS
J. mu...prcs,
. A. Mlnu.ces_of tne Rrg ,,Ilarly Scheduled Courcil Mcchno .held Tuesday,. Page 34)0
November 9, 1971'..
h. Minutes_ofthe Reg4larlx Scheduled Council Meet::_rn held Tuesday, niovem5r 111/6.
Page 3E54
USLC HE[.):INGS (Continued from Decsiber 7, 1976 Council Meeting)
Ar ,24 "plof Prerv;,, recoc,..t for approval of Page 3'18
devi:lopmcnt standards. rz.zonin ,j fror, !:Llrel to C-R...:gh•Inal Service and
preliminary. pl aonruval. The :41te is ifteoted in toe northeast quadrant
of S6onner Bouluva-d and !,5 169/212 intersc:tion. (Ordinance No.
35/3
357 and Resolution No. 1217)
n. FastP,Iest relnest for rezoirt from Rural to Page 350t,
PM 2.5 O C.93 aey. for 129 m.lts. The site is located 3590
west of The Preserve Center. (Godinane Nu. 356)
PETITIONS, & CO;0IUVICATTONS .
t . Regec:<,t of tird;.Allon . Lei to Lopoal the 1,.oard t1s& kijustMents Page 3592
doctsion a 2)ln t L n tot ;!'.,ii Fore :?..t
Addition to Stovon, He;qh .;:. eate6 Nnveiker 24, 19/6
attached')
ORDINANCES & RES00_113N.;
2nd Reading_ of Ordior:To No. .4 4. rczoninn 34 lots on appruxiwAely 17 Page 3593 acres t o J.; re7o0na
dIreement.
0. Resol ution Mo. 1272, Cri.:ic2 .Pocric:Itiott Grant, Page ,iS64
U. MEMBERS:
CD:i,jAL ..1/\)17:
touncil Agenda - 2 - Tues.,December 14, 1976
V. ORDINAUCES 0 RESOLUTIONS (continued)
C. Resolution No. 1225 t_granting_a conditional on-sale liquor license Page 3606 to John Suback and Gordon Koehnen.
E. 2nd Readingof Ordinance No. 343, Creekwood double bungalow and single Page 3530 family detachc(i, Hustad Development Corporation, rezoning from rural to RM 6. and rezoning agreement.
VT. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A, Reports of Council members.
!!!_tpor% of City Manager
1. Luburtan Public Health Nursing Service
2. Fire_Deparpent 5-Year Capital Improvement Program
3. Status on Local 49 Negotiations and 1977 Salary Appropriations t. Status on DeceFber 2OtonciTmeetinn.
C. Report of Director of CommuniSy Services
1. KucheliDeayer Properties Page 3624
2. Metropolitan Parks and Oren Space Five -Year Capital Improvement F-oerem
pzIport
2. Final Plat approval for Hidden Oaks Audition esolution No. 1224)
F. Report of Finance Oirectcr
1. Clerk's License List Page 3633
Payment bf Clai!iis Nos. 3088 - 3247,
?IL •FR OUSINESS.
A. Green Acre Law (continued New Business from 42/7/76)
B. Discussion. on Sign Ordinance Dif_t_(continued New Business from 12/7/76)
V/f1. ADJOURNMENT,.
Page 3609
Page 3610
Page 3623
Page 3630
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 1976
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT:
7:30 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel
Billy Bye
Joan Meyers
Tim Pierce
Sidney Pauly
City Manager Roger Ulstad
City Attorney Harlan Perbix
Director of Community Services Marty Jessen
Planning Director Dick Putnam
Recording Secretary Joyce Provo
INVOCATION: Pastor James Barth, Immanuel Lutheran Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were requested to be added to the agenda under the
"New Business" category:
A. Discussion of traffic circulation and parkine at the facility at
rthOast corner ef ghv.ay aria Baker arm [wads.
B. Receive two Outlets . from Hus tad Development Ccinleration..
C. Review of the ltindslope Project.
MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the agenda as amended
and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. Minutes of the Regularly Scheduled Council Meeting held Tuesday, October 26, 1976.
Pg. 3, 5th para., 1st line, after "to" insert "individually".
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the minutes of the Council
meeting held Tuesday, October 26, 1976,as amended and published. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. Minutes of the Regularly Scheduled Council 'Meeting held Tuesday, November 2,
1976,_
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to approve the minutes of the Council
meeting held Tuesday, Noveirber 2, i976 as published. Meyers, Pierce, Bye and
Perizel voted "aye", Pauly "abstained". Motion carried.
C. Minutes of the Cunvassing Board held Thursday, November 4 1976.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the minutes of the Canvassing
Board held Thursday, Nove:t.hun 4, 19M. Meyers, Bye, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye",
Pierce "abstained". Motion :.arried.
Council Minutes
- 2 - Tues.,November 23, 1976
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Fetz Construction, request to rezone approximately 1/2 acre from Rural to
Office for use as an office and warehouse. The site is located at 8555 Flying
Cloud Drive (Old Phoenix
City Manager (listed explained that an affidavit is on file which calls fo
r
this Public Hearing, and the proponents are present to present their propo
s
a
l
to the Council,.
Mr. Fetz stated that their request was turned down by the Planning Commiss
i
o
n
but they had requested to appear before the Council to receive a decision
by the Council. Mr. Fetz and Tony Christenson, Fetz Construction, spoke to
their request and answered questions of Council members.
Pauly noted that one of the concerns of the Planning Commission was outside
storage, and questioned if there have been any changes in the proposal
regarding same.
Mr. Fetz stated that basically they do not need any outside storage and
that everything could be stored inside. They plan on fencing the back area
with a 6 foot privacy fence. Also they do not need the use of two driveways
,
one would be sufficient.
Penzel questioned what kind of screening would there be in addition to th
e
6 foot fence. Fetz replied they would put in some curbs and shrubs to th
e
front and north side of the building.
Planner Putnam outlined the reasons why the Planning Commission and staff
recommended denial of the Fetz proposal, specifically because it is incon
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
with the U.S. 169 Mini-Sector Study and Ordinance No. 135.
MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to close the Public Hearing and de
n
y
the request of Feu. Construction to rezone approximately 1/2 acre from Rur
a
l
to Office for use as an office and warehouse as this request is
inconsistent with the U.S. 169 Mini-Sector Study and Ordinance No.
135. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Pools ide Apartments, The Preserve, 84 unit apartment and double bungalow
lots located south of Anderson Lakes Parkway and northwest of Neill Lake
Road in The Preserve, request for PUD Development Stage, rezoning to RN 2.5
and RM 6.5 and preliminary plat approval.
City Manager Ulstad explained that an affidavit is on file calling for this
Public Hearing and that the Planning Coninission has heard the presentation.
Don Hess, The Preserve, and Doug Moe, architect, spoke to the proposal
and outlined same with graphic illustrations and a site model. Following
their presentation, Mr. Hess and Mr. Moe answered questions of Council
members.
Planning Director Putnam outlined the proposal the Planning Commission
considered and specifically spoke to the Commission's recommendations mad
e
at their meeting held October 25, 1976, and to the Staff Report dated
October 19, 1976.
Larry Peterson, The Preserve, explained that the renter would receive one
cederground parking space inn Line rate or the rent.
Council Minutes
- 3 - Tues.,November 23, 1976
B. Poolside Apartments, The Preserve (continued)
Meyers noted that the Engineer's report and Staff report indicates The Preserve
has not presented a landscaping plan. Mr. Moe explained that the landscaping
budget will be in the vicinity of $20,000.00.
Penzel questioned the distance between the proposed apartment units and
Highpoint lot lines. Mr. Hess replied approximately 450 feet.
Penzel questioned if The Preserve could see an opportunity for taking over
the project. Mr. Peterson replied that they have not considered this as
The Preserve feels this type of development of double bungalow lots would
be very salable.
Meyers asked if, because of the visibility of the parking lot, The Preserve
would consider planting a few trees in the parking lot itself to break up the
monotony. Mr. Moe replied they would certainly consider it, but as of right
now they have not really faced up to that particular question. Putnam added
that when the Planning Commission reviewed the modified plan the Commission
had in mind that there would be plantings similar to Homart's where trees
were brought into the parking lot.
Meyers explained that because of the heighth of the parking lot that internal
lighting fixtures in the parking lot should have some restrictions so adjacent
property owners are not looking al lighting fixtures. Mr. Hess explained
that shields can be provided.
Jim Mars, 10700 Lake fall Drive, stated that as the project moves away from
the residential area he becomes less hesitate about the project. He is concerned
about the size as it is twice the size of the Ridgewood Condominiums. Also
questioned if there would be an assurance of a buffering zone.
John Crouch, legal counsel for Tom Bach who resides at 9051 Neill Lake Road,
spoke to his communication directed to the Council dated November 20, 1976.
(Communication attached as part of minutes).
John Retterath, 9011 Highpoint Circle, questioned the price range from the
original concept.
Tom Bach, 9051 Neill Lake Road. stated that if this project is built it will
have a substantial impact on the single family detached residential area,
ani requested that The Preserve build transitional type housing.
Meyers questioned the management guidelines. Mr. Hess replied that Landtech
is going to try and run a tight ship. but as yet Landtech has made no definite
couuritment.
MOTION: Pierce moved. seconded by Meyers, to close the Public Hearing and
adopt Resolution Mo. 1211, approving the preliminary plat of Poolside Apartments.
Furthey to adopt recommendations cited by the Plahning Commission in their
minutes dated October 25,eed that 4 double bungalow lots totalling a maximum
of 8 units be approved oh '00 1.6± acre site along Neill Lake Road subject to
size and setback recrairements as specified in Zoning Ordinance No. 135. Also
add the requirement that shielding of lights in the parking lot be provided as
visual screening for adjaceat property owners, and that plantings of trees be
I ntegrated in the parking lot and butter treatment between the double bungalow
lots and the aeartment site be required. Motion carried unanimously.
Council i4inutes - 4 - Tues.,November 23, 1976
B. Poolside Apartments, The Preserve (continued)
Although Pauly voted in favor of the aforementioned motion, she expressed
reservations about the project mainly due to the size. However, she felt
caught in a corner as the City had made a previous commitment.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to approve the 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 351, rezoning the 6.39 acre site to RN 2.5, and 1.6± acre site
to NM 6.5 for the construction of 84 apartment units and the maximum of 8 double
bungalow units. Further direct the City Attorney to draft a rezoning
agreement before the 2nd reading, including recommendations of the Staff and
Planning Commission, with the stipulation that access to the underground parking
garage from the Anderson Lakes Parkway may be restricted in the future to right in
right out; and the Planning Commission review a completed landscaping plan and
completed internal site plan before the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 351.
Motion carried unanimously.
C. Vacation of drainacie and utility easement over Lot 17, Block 1, Duck Lake
Estates (Resolution No. 1212).
City Engineer Jullie spoke to his memo dated November 18, 1976, and
recommended adoption of Resolution No. 1212.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 1212, vacating
certain easements in Duck Lake Estates. Further direct staff not to release
Resolution to Hennepin County until we have received documents which cover the
new easements. Motion carried unanimously.
ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
crdinn:e No. 352, realing Ordirar.cm No. 1F.2, which is the ordinance
licensing and regulaLing_the sale of intoxicating liquor by certain clubs
within the Ville,g_e of Eden Prairie.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to approve the 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 352, repealing Ordinance No. 158, which is the ordinance
licensing and regulating the sale of intoxicating liquor by certain
clubs within the Village of Eden Prairie. Motion carried unanimously.
V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council meithers
1. Pauly spoke of the joint meeting held for the Planning Commission and
Parks, Recreation '& Natural Resources Commission held Monday, 11/22/76,
specifically pertaining to Purgatory Creek. She explained this was a
preliminary meetin9 and there will be another meeting in January.
The upshot of the meeting was to prioritize what segments of the Creek
should he looked at, funding, and to study the ramifications of private
ownership.
2. Meyers reported on the Board of Appeals A Adjustments meeting held
Thursday, November 18. As a result of the aforementioned meeting, Meyers
made the following motion:
MOTION: Moyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to direct staff to draw up
some guidelines i-c the inspection Department and Board of Appeals A
AdjastemniCs on sctoark applications tor eeral zoned residential
building parcels and if City initiated rezoning should be
recounended. Motion carried unanimously.
A.
Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,November 23, 1976
A. Reports of Council members (continued)
3. Penzel stated that it was his intent to meet with City Manager
Ulstad on Friday of this week, and if Council members have any concerns
to let him know.
Penzel reported that he had been invited to attend a meeting
on Transcendental Meditation.
B. Report of City Manager
I. Report on Vo-Tech Model Home
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Penzel, to receive and file report
dated November 15, 1976 on additional space for City offices. Motion
carried unanimously.
2. Suburban Public Health Nursing Service
City Manager Ulstad spoke to memo from Betty Johnson dated November 19
and to meeting held on November 17th by Hennepin County's Office of
Planning and Development. As a result of the meeting, Mr. Ulstad
suggested at least at this point to continue with the services that
are being Proposed by Sueerban Public Health Nursing Service. He explained that
there will be a Public Hearing held Tuesday, November 30, 7:30 PM, at the Southdal(
Regional Library for the south suburban area.
Uistad further explai :e that the Suburban Public Health Nursing
Service would like an idea of intent of suburbs at the present time.
It wes the consensus of Councilman Pierce, Betty Johnson and Mr. Ulstad
to continue with the same type of services for 1977 as in 1976.
Penzel stated he would urge staff to recommend a choice between
Methodist Hospital or a Joint Powers Agreement rather than continuing
with the present plan as he feels the services we are receiving have
been minimal.
Meyers felt the City is paying a lot of money for administration,
coordination, and dissemination and not for provision of any services
with the present plan. Pierce stated he was reassured this was not the
case, and from his exposure on the South Hennepin Human Services Council
it appears that for the dollars spent at this particular time we will
end up getting more services with SPHNS. Some
other arrangements in the future might be desirable.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to continue a decision on
this matter until the Ductmber 7th Meeting, and instruct staff to
investigate the dollar figures between our existing service and purchase
of services from Bloomington in the form of a Joint Powers Agreement.
Motion carried unanimme.ly.
Council Minutes. - 6 - Tues.,November 23, 1976
C. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Receive appraisal on the Cedar Hills Golf & Ski area.
Director of Community Services Jcssen explained that an appraisal has
been received for the Cedar Hills Golf & Ski facility in the amount of
$1,200,000 for 300 acres, which includes improvements to the land
for golf and ski but excludes all equipment.
Jessen noted that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
took no action on this proposal but requested further information.
No action necessary.
2. Recommendation from the Parks, Recreation R. Natural Resources Commission
on the Metropolitan Parks, and Open Space 5-year Capital improvement
Program.
Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated
November 19, 1976 and action taken by the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission at their meeting held Monday, November 22,
specifically noting that the Metropolitan Council has included
Lake Riley in their program.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to direct staff to draw
up a resolution to be submitted to the Council on December 7, and to
cortact people around Lake Riley as to the disposition of this
proposal. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Receive Kochev/fleaver
Director of Community Seraices Jessen spoke to the action taken at
the Parks, Recreation & iletural Resources Commission meeting held
Monday, November 22, 1976, recommending to the Council that the City
enter into am option agreement for Kucher property at $4,600 per acre
assuming specials, and that an agreement be prepared with Deaver on
a Contract for Deed basis to be executed by December 31, 19/7 at
$3,000 per acre as presented.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Pierce, to direct staff to draw
up more specific proposals for the December 7th Council meeting and
attempt to secure a realistic figure on the Kucher property.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. Recommendation of the Parks. Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
on the Raze alEaperty.
Director of Community Services Jesser spoke to his memo dated November 19,
1976 to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission on the
Raze property.
MOTION: Meyers moved, neconded by Pauly, to direct staff to proceed
with securing an appraisal on the Raze property along with a "no
cost option". Motion carried unanimously.
Council Minutc:s - 7 - Tues.,November 23, 1976
MTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to continue past 11:00 P.M. Motion carried
unulimously.
D. Report of Planning Director
1. Land Development Procedures: PUD Procedures, Zoning Procedures
and Platting Procedures.
Planning Director Putnam explained that the Planning Commission
has recommended approval of the RID Development Procedures as
distributed to Council members.
City Attorney Perbix stated that the POD Procedures would require
a Public Hearing. He further expressed his opinion that the
PUD Procedures should be incorporated into Ordinance No. 135, and
the other procedures take the form of a resolution.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to request each
Councilperson to contact the City Manager with their particular
concerns by the end of December, and that the Land Development
Procedures and Setback Variances as revised be brought back to the
Council the 3rd meeting in January. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Setback Variances.
The Council received the report on Setback Variances from City Enoineer Jullie
dated October 19, 1976. Action on this item inc1ud4in the above motion.
E. Report of City Engineer
I. Status report on Chanhassen's request to connect to the Eden Prairie
Duck Lake-1 Trunk Sewer.
City Manager Ulstad spoke to communication received from Russell
Larson, Chanhassen's City Attorney, dated November 16, 1976, offering
Eden Prairie $65,000 for permission to connect to the Eden Prairie
Duck Lake-1 Trunk Sewer, said amount to be payable in equal annual
Installments of $4,333.00 for a period of fifteen years without interest
on the unpaid principal balance, with the first installment to be paid
December 10, 1976. Council members felt the figure totally unacceptable
when it includes no interest on the unpaid balance.
Mr. Larson noted their other alternative would be condemnation of Eden
Prairie.
MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to instruct Mr. Larson to bring
back to Chanhassen the Council's offer of being agreeable to accept
$65,000 for trunk sewer payment for Chanhassen to connect to the Eden
Prairie Duck Lake-I Trunk Sewer in equal annual installments for 15 years
with interest on the unpaid principal balance at 67.. Motion carried
unanimously.
--;)12
Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,November 23, 1976
E. Report of City Engineer (continued)
2. Resolutions for cooperative agreements with the State of Minnesota
covering _roadny construction, silinalization and right-of-way dedication
for T.H. 169 imilrovements, I.C. 51-266.
The following resolutions were passed with the stipulation that they
be withheld from the Hiyhway Department until everything has been worked
out to the satisfaction of the City Engineer:
a, MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to adopt Resolution No.
1213, authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute cooperative
construction agreement No. 58346 with the State of Minnesota for
roadway construction on TH 169 from I-494 to 1/4 mile south of Schooner
Blvd. (Ring Road). Motion carried unanimously.
b. MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No.
1214, authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute cooperative
agreement No. 57926 with the State of Minnesota for a traffic signal
installation on T.H. 169 at the northerly Eden Prairie Center entrance.
Motion carried unanimously.
c. MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 1215,
dedicating easements end right-of-way acquired by the City for TM.
169 improvenents, I.C. 51-266 for street and highway purposes. Motion
carried unanimously.
F. Report of Finance Director
1. Payment of Claks Mae. 2931 -
MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve Payment of
Claims Nos. 29t1 - 3087. Roll Call Vote: Pierce, Pauly, Meyers
and Penzel votcd "aye". Motion carried Unanimously.
2. Clerk's License List
MOTIUNI: Meyers moved, seconded Pierce, to approve the Clerk's License
List dated November 23, 1976. Motion carried unanimously.
Concerns were expressed by Council members regarding the licensing
of solicitors in Eden Prairie and a suggestion was made to include
an article in the "HAPPENINGS" pertaining to same.
Cl. I:LW BUSINESS
A. Discussion of traffic ciroolation and parking at the facility at
northeast corner e highwa and Ez; ker and Mitchell Roads.
Meyers expressed kr concern about cars parking on Baker and Mitchell Roads
and the driveway entrance into McDonald's. She feels the parking facilities
are totally inadequate.
Council Minutes — 9 - Tues.,November 23, 1976
A. Discussion of traffic circulation and parking at the facility at northeast
corner of Highway #5 and baker and Mitchell Roads. (continued)
City Engineer Jullie explained that McDonald's is going to be providing
more parking north of the road for overflow parking and that the narrow
winding road will be 28 feet wide next spring. Also the access to Highway
#5 will be revised. Jullie further stated that he would check and see if
the road can be widened with gravel temporarily for the winter.
Meyers questioned if there would be "no parking" signs posted on Baker and
Mitchell Roads. Jullie replied if there is a problem "no
parking" signs will be posted.
B. Receive two Outlots from Hustad Development Corporation
MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Meyers, to accept deeds to Outlot A
in Prairie East 2nd Addition, and Outlot B in Prairie East. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Review of the Windslope Project.
Planner Putnam brought the Council up-to-date on the Windslope project,
specifically speaking to the requested change by the developer and The
Preserve from the original plan as to parking on Anderson Lakes Parkway
and Preserve Boulevard.
Putnam further explained that the people taking the project over will be
National Housing Managerient and their management plan will be brought
before the Council when it is completed. Meyers suggested that this
management plan be submitted to the Human Rights Commission also.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Pauly, to adjourn the meeting at 11:35 PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
MEMORAN DIJM
TO: Eden Prairie City Council
FROM: W. Harlan Perbix
DATE: December 10, 1976
RE: Design Framework Manual
At the last Council meeting I was asked for an opinion as to whether
or not the City Council would have the authority to enter into a procedure of
the type outlined by Area 0 in The Preserve Commercial Center and called a
Design Framework Manual.
It is my opinion that incorporating such a procedure within a
developers agreement would be legal. It is an extension of what we are
already doing albeit in a more limited manner.
Should the Council see fit to use the concept, I would suggest that
we try to clarify the composition and structure of tha Reveiw Board and its
relationship to the Planning Commission and the City Council.
W.H.P.
jh
14 0
City Council
Dick Putnam, Planning Director
Roger Dist:id, City \tanager
Dectinibe r , 1970
DESIC.;n fli.1\11;50gli )1V;i1.51,
f.gigii 1 Al. AREA
AIZEA -
The following eel ccl fiesi go framcwork 0.1 oil., ! ref Its s I he changes suggest ed
lit the I'l ;inn i ss i on Di nut es of Nov, r'be ) tit h, Iclic cf1,?, staff suggest i ens
hiltt C 01,1:aellt to 0 I . C.1 I) 1 mer.bees
The lieu addi t i oss love an ast 'ii sk and not o to the sourcc, i . c (
and Zoning si on, or Ci C ( City' Counci I ).
Mese geaora 1 quc ,t ions were asked by the flake ing Col;a6ssion or Counci 1
mcaers concerning the Donifla framework Manual :
. The i ('Ii licv i Com;;.it t et; Nonibership .
Tlic Desi gn framework );..ntia I speci firs c ty staff mintier, and
a retire sent :it fl'Orl Thu re servo. Addi t ioiri 1 consul t it may
be request oti by ittember, of t bo cccc,cca (tee with the cost paid
for by the :910 i cant .
A sup.gest ioo is that ono tit ,cotinci I or plonaing commission
meads, might ho achicil to the coiami Ii it"
2. Set backs shaii Id be included in the liosi cii Frena-work Manual
.
lii the cot , cticcl ,taff report tit Dec. 20i0 and in the revised
copy on pao,.., i; Piot ." ;Hi! i t (ti Idi cit outlastst
are iiropin.i•it. Those stand:_ rds. c 1'0:1 C:It 11;01' i ital thcy TO1,1
to the ;,r c kiss; f; cat baii. or .0.r, ror Ito sits,. SetiaaA,
vttry ro!i; ;;C feet to 1 feet cc, tool Icci setback s.
5, t\ quest ion has 'wen rai sed colic orn i eipa I park i ng itt Area C.
The 1,cai gn sac',, con, ;tont:II din', not speci fy whether ;wirt in; shout:,
ca ewsteil and Iwo i by the city oi 1.v private pre,ierty owners.
Iodate no cieeoie:,:nent". loolS, inc. lilcIf d ruin] cilia] parking .
4. ii t icai ;on filet ,
The icc ci.c. `Ira:a:work !iiantia I was out -le:1r ns to who d id what.
rev i immad 1 pi oce, 11cc re;iponsibi I it y with the City Planning
st cFf .
5. ;Thor Id t ii• I provis ion I es charge back staff I itt expentlituros
tirj a.c. I ho revised ICI, a rev i fee of S75.00, or some ot !ice
f is! •;, would be olhcirr.l t o each I ic,it ion to cover the cost
of lee ti ccclii 0(0.1 'ac" for on.11 1 ting Sony ices ,IS.Se.se,1
1
G. he I' I er;;;i • a c c000 que!,1 i II fast food rest at; rant s.
Id Ii cc ,;„ cci 00cc 1 1 5. 6!) 1 ..)111:11...,.. cccl r th:It ro a good
day •1 op Jot pldn
to". o I low ia pa t o froest and inn uses • 1w they restaurant
ot I lit s or el I'or coion c cccl bo 'I rc'giilccl iccocloC tin; IIII
sp.''ccc ci ;a wo.clil pveh ;bit vcost :wiling pylon gni; 'Oct would hoe,"
d es ,1%, /1,. ;11,11 ill 111 Ic I 11,, bLI , t hor••iiy realm ing
inany of tic, oo ji .I Iona!, I o :1 it dcl. free, (coccii nafost food restaurant a
11;,, i ,11, 1 ly 111 n Ii
7 . ) h i . f .1 I. a iv inotodoil for tic' Coon,' i I 's rev i ow. These figures
lid II 1.5, I:1 141 I, IA eel I elianyes ncorporat i Ilt 0 (i.e 1111.1
f ;Trio, ed lo; C iy Coolie i I
/
Staff ;lc:port-Arca G -2- Nov. 2, 1976
1:•!:
STAFF EVALMION OF OEM- 10/7/76 DRAFT
I. INTEIJ
(comment) Excellent statement of intent..
II. GOALS/OBJECTIVES
(continent) lIasically good, however, would suggest these ch
a
n
g
e
s
:
In contrast to typical piecemeal land develoumen
t
A
r
e
a
"
G
"
i
n
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
-
Commercial Center presents an excellent opportunit
y
t
o
r
e
a
l
i
z
e
a
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
project mutually beneficial to the community and
t
o
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
b
y
creating a strong, recognizable identity or "sense
o
f
p
l
a
c
e
"
a
n
d
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
i
n
g
high quality design and construct ioneeeceh-as-wes---at.t
.
T
i
n
e
d
e
l
n
-
Y
o
r
l
e
t
e
o
w
n
-
l
e
a
n
-
e ,e4-eeteinee-coe .ff,eec-i-e14-eefridont44f1--d4waomeent-44_Edd nnasofal__.",. 4
t1ne.--sfarre-epprogrii7 --e5-1 -s-2reeeetteelefore'44ite*'eetieec
tior4telecent-------atieieaveed-2 L4decif ty" and the see
The physical environment of the proposed Preserve
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
C
e
n
t
e
r
i
s
cenceived to be an inviting, informal and enjoya
b
l
e
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
c
e
n
t
e
r
.
I
t
i
s
not intended to ccmeete with Eden Prairie Center,
b
u
t
t
o
s
u
p
P
l
e
m
e
n
t
i
t
s
cori7fmeciel neiebor. Ge:aes of the in-.iivideel land parcels cemnrising
/Ted G in The Preseeve Co=ercial Center. the basic de
s
i
g
n
g
o
a
l
i
s
simpV
to "pull the piece's together" and provide an optim
u
m
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
o
f
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
i
t
y
.
,T,Toola,ak• v,,:e41o5 iri,sA 6,6 LfrITO.A.4"
-2 trevi.."-`4e +IAA. it'1.1-,y,c- C"^e-r
Through the DM approach The Preserve and city review of each development
request will he processed faster and casicr with definite standards to
guide each project.
Ill. MPAllM), Aw!e/-- f'D •
The architectural imeee of The Preserve Ccemercia
l
C
e
n
t
e
r
"
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
d
e
p
e
n
d
upon the impler ,eation of past styles of oeveleoment, but upon the in-
tegrity with which'the physical design reflects it
s
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
.
T
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
,
the approach indieeted within the "Design Framew
o
r
k
N
a
n
u
a
l
"
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
t
o
establish a design review board to asstst future b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
t
e
e
m
s
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
within the context of the ftemework plan, materia
l
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
and design
review procedure.
fe framework Plans
rrsn.tusl...:14ca
;;-:t :
.and-hiecoui;----pee-;--,e=etee-4, Each diagram site plan in-
cluded serves to establish the general relationsh
i
p
o
f
t
h
e
individual parcels to the whole and to describe ba
s
i
c
fuhct icnel renu iroments such as pedestr i an, vehicular
e
n
d
leaelecepe Are.:s shoon in the plan and as further nesci ibed
by p1annino criteria, 7 .1.";
c'r- YV,11/V't bG
addition-
l'Aport -Arca G -3 -
Nov. 2, 1976
B. Material Standards
A -st-i;(17,`.-4,5palc-1te.,- of materials will be selected by the
.designmittee which should provide the common bond
necessary to achieve design costinuity without limiting
creative design opportunity. Material selections -1-er-Fri-efi-
shall be governed by limitations
of availability and longevity of the source. Reasonable
projected costs for the material, installation and its
subsequent maintenance will dictate ultimate selections.
C. Design Review
A design review procedure shall be established to coordinate
all projects within Area G of The Preserve Commercial Center.
The _procedure shall be administered in a flexible fashion
.eent--evi,er-t-5- to al low individual inter-
pretation while assuring overall quality control and design
compatibility.
IV. SCOPE
The authority for desion control derives its basis from the 'act that this
'Pesien framework Manual" is incorporated within the developer's*,reernent
betwenn The Preserve developer end City of Eden Prairie and which will be
inclu d ed as part of the. beveloper s land purcha ,...e anreements.
4:. : • " , -4 ehat t (4
Ci4
The extent or scope of design control shall Le concerned with five basic
...ents or categories as noted below:
1. Site Planning
2. Exterior Buildir;g Materials
3. Outdoor Lighting .
4. Landscaping
5. Graphics/Sighage
The first item above is discussed in the Framework Plan section of this
b;annol and the others are outlineJ in greater detail in the Material
Standards seation. All are suhjec.t to discussion and approval according
to thc procedure described in Pcsign Review.
5c 74,
I i•..1 L • C. -4-
V. hI c N.1 7 1::-.:!: l't Aff
Nov . 2, 1976
, to it
In addition to the coal of identity and continuity, one of the important
objectiw2s of Area a in The Preserve Commercial Cent- is to control
vehicular traffic. Consequently, it is essential to develop circulation
systems Othin the project area that reduce potential conflict between
autorebiles, pedestrians, and service vehicles and reinforce the concept
of an iregrated whole. The diaeram site plan serves as a base of refer-
ence for individual owners to relate their separate site plans within the
context of the whole -- not only in terms of circulation, but design con-
tinuity as well.
—LJ A key element in this Framework Plan is the identification of possible
altern%tives which reinforce a desirable vehicular circulation,
/ access and parking system.
52vtizt,
An additional element in this Framework Plan is identification of landscape
and conservation areas which establish building end parking setbacks, re-
strict signage placement and type, and encourage a unified landscape de-
velopment. See attached developc -ient diagrams.
Ttic-ichase-r4e--t-p=ppoes--44-res-t-r-4-c 2i-deye4opracht-44411-in-the-4-el-1-ow-ing--1-andseapt:•.-
-are-es-a:7-0e-s-e-t-i-6ed-h-e-'row:
itt:,)(VPy - shall occur adjacent to Hiohway 159 and Schooner Boule-
vard :TIATiais as on the Area G dzsi-n WaVal proposed landscape
areas the following design elements shall EQ treated as indicated.-
Br/. 1,Pm .e.:;40M
1. Parking - Par'find •and ;y,tcmebile eil-x)ation• within the 20 land-
n-------S-efape-a- re a-Vacl:pf:4:;,;•it-te.-. at the proponent' s
proposed landscaping, grading or structural screening
mitigates the adverse viseE.1' effects of parked cars and
extensive paving surfaces wh2n viewed from outside tne
site, ,
2. Signage - Only temporary free-standing sales signage associated with
primary sales of the developer is permitted within the
area. Other signage shall be limited to building identi-
fication and shall he wall_e_unted either on an approved
— retaining -Wall -Zr -E-Uilding the existing City
by j
sicnage ordinance in effect at the time of area develop-
ment.
3. Lighting- An approved fixture and pole shall provide,,....$1Ny .
internal lighting. Building facades .cdia-14 -be note°
from•low ground mounted or building mounted light sources.
4. Planting- All landscape and gradine plans are subject to approval
prior to impleenLat-ien x tAntJmn rex-vmtzvy,c,vd.
2. a.
Skade Trees - A mixture - 6" caliper specimen
sized trees shall be installed on the site in an informal
fashion in positions which maintain reasonable business
visability, safety and maintenance requirements.
3 77
Leff 1:epoil:Area G -5-
Nov. 2, 1976
!
Shrubs or Small Ornamentals - When desired in designated
landscape are sicali CiTTimited to foundation planting
of the building or screening of adjacent parking or
circulation facilities in such a manner as to preserve
safe site distances for pedestrian and auto systems.
Ground Cover - All ground surface areas must be covered
and nSTi.aTied. Lawn areas shall be created from sod.
Other areas not sodded or paved shall be covered with
hardy ground covers o- acceptable mulch materiels.
BUILOIMC, _LANDSCAPE AREA-- A minimum space of 10' forming a complete envelope
surrounding the proposed structure shall be conceived to be the building -
landscape area (see exhibits).
Permitted uses shall include -- Lighting, Planting, Loading and Unloading
Facilities, Pedestrian Access and Egress Facilities, Terracing or Patio
Screening, and Miscellaneous :Landscape Features - sculpture, fountains, etc.
OPTIONAL PUKING & LANDSCAPE AREAS - See Exhibits C F
1. Parking - Primary parking within these designated areas s`.o..11- to
discouraged, by Future parkin; requiee-
ments nay be satisfied by the paving of all or sole of
these aretis y.. v:444 ...74 4-0 jkc.cc eLreki-
2. Sionace Sienage is discourened-y-,,l',:f.tittot in these areas.
City's sign ordinance in effect at
the time of the areas Luildinp development shall govern.
tty pro,ritte-a--
-props-e-s.ett-,ing,
3. Lishtina - Committee approved architectural lighting fixtures and
poles may be used for parking area lighting. All sign-
age shall be internally illuminated.
4. Planting - Mardy, standard varieties of Minnesota trees, Shrubs
and ground covers shall be used to break up and screen ,
perking facilities. All surface arc-as not paved shall
be landscaped and maintained. 41.-1-ands-c-ap,a-ar,d-gradi-ng
4-1-ar,lia-4-4---be-subjeet--to-the--appr4va-1--of-the--comnittee
additions-
huilding Setback Standards:
1. Til 369 Schocner nivd-all structures shall be setback a minimum
of 30 foet from the street right-of-way.
2. Street_a ( ('0' W of W )-oll structures sbg11 be setback a
mioioum of 21, feet from the street right-of-way.
3. Street h 60' l: of W -collector SO ' (R of W ) - all structures
shall he sethaa a minium of 20 feet fr ,im the right-of-way.
4. Priv:;te Access Fasvments 30' (Rofh) - all structures shall be
net ick a mi 0 ir,nn of iS feel from the cam:wont line.
f.vca G
Nov. 2, 1976
n '1 ._ 1'011 CY
in all case:. the toe of a slope must occur on a property or right of way
line. A hi-Jh side owner may elect to construct a retaining wall on his side
of II;e property line to improve the useability of his site. All land areas
;aust be stabil i7ed during ilnd ei'ter construction to protect the -public from
int cnn cnJ 1;;n9 t ere cffocts of soil erosion.
Ulf= FT-T.:WES
r Jnc , re.! oirin9 features must be designed to conform to the materials
usvi in
trio pri:T7ary building. All retaining well designs and locations are
• sujuct to oproval.
C...s .n.;-!; of adjacent properties are encouraged to arrange joint or coordinated
mai ni.c.n.-.nce a•;reenents with a landscape, or nursery contractor to
,..14ki..o,te.- 144 i f ii• rr".1,:;r2 r, •
er-ior-hose-on-c-Onnec-fi-oris-
o :r-non-ndj Ape
•I
•;:!, ,:,--;',..!;;t-!ic,---.:!&;.,2;-7.7 -;:,ci-J.J4t1 .4-.z11.--.14:-ara.4-:--z=r.;.,-(1._.1_4D:.1.1_,- a_gr oundac1-411
SHIMp yArxmc
To reduce the ru e her of parl;ing spaces within Area G , the concept of shared
ivIng is enco ,JragAhetvren adjrcont ownerships. P....ww-6.1D v,-1,,"41 GLIILarrevafe
i•:, du-v:4,1)P, drA - 41\Ve°- (^ ' ic.A n ca,C FIV2-.6- *
adf.itien- ar IF°
-.-("47--tli,.:---t44 ,ti -i-Ar--1410-s-5 .elt-4-oc-a4 ,41.g-in---AlEV, each rn, CY must provide
ad:T ,;00 parug !Tares on his Site or have a legal easer,cnt 14.11/. parking
spaces off his 7,ite. Joint pall:lug area!: betw .con two or more Sit:CS is
enconr:Iged thereby elilyinting side- yard 'setbacks and gaining additional. •
in;,, area.
AI the lime o: building permit and design reviewanowner ray demonstrate
to the committee Ilvn only a portion of his final parking spaces arc needed.
Th( iAmnilIcc may allow phased d0VolOpl1ilt Of 'the parking area if the
critelia arc met!
1. that the site has adequate Size and layout for the total parking
reenircmynts.
2. that. :my !Olarcd aCCC.CS or driveways ill allow orderly develop-
Swat (if all adtlecmt parcels.
tivil proper screening and landcaping are provided consistent
with he 11.!.7 .
2 .1-- 71
Iff Reporrea G
-7 -
Nov. 2, 1976
// 7 4
PANNING STANhARDS
The guide for parking spaces per land will be the City Parking Ordinance
1;.»Lber lal . The required spaces may be modified by the committee if
he change i s dmnonst rated to be appropriate.
ArCr`,S
To 1:prev ,-.• !. 'et) and to reduce the amount of surface (-overage in the
developsent area, the concept of sharing access points between adjacent
ownertihiin i c encour
Kan TREE CONSERVATION AREA - See Exhibits A arid 13
To retain dominant species of existing tree clecwth in desionated areas
o
f
the develcprit, the developer ‘vi CI protect thein exi sting Vegeta-
tion frem the direct effect of developme.nt. See development plan for
location.
SELECTION OF CONSTRUCTION WkTERIALS
-
To assure aesthetic -c-ensi-nultir of the developratnt area, the developer
p
r
o
., .
poses to rcstrict the type, color amid texture of primary building mate
r
i
a
l
s
*
.
(See attached specif
•
* Building structures and associated retaining features.
* Paved areas park ingt stlkin3 surf ace.).
SNCAITY
To protect private I rivs•fti2nts, all future development within the are
a
w
i
l
l
be subject to final approval by Eden Preirie Fire, Police and local B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
1 nspec ions Departments.
EASEIIENT
To guarantee develop7lont GE the area in accordance with existing proper
t
y
caschents, all properly shown within the existing 165' l. Si'. power line
C'an,C".2111; shall be subject to the approval of 11.S.P. prior to physical
development of a parcel..
DEVElniSNT PARS
To assure quality of standard designed foundation construction a prope
r
r
e
-
cord, for easts•;otit restrict ions al 1 to i lding locations are to be located
o
n
prepared building sites, un .1ess otherwise approved by the review board. See
exhibits for pod luealimr.s.
PLAN PrviN POM
The City Staff of Et'on Prairie working -work-inir directly with The Preserve
dovoloper shall pr,sprucass building permit applications. A report from
t
h
e
City Stal f person shall be required as a building permit document to
fulfill
City roguirements to issue a building permit to the proponent.
c!)
'Stuff Ccpoit. Area G
Nov. 2, 1976
VI. llATIRIN. STAWAR:IS - Tentative Specification
• •
llie use of the materials or products outlined below is not
.
4
4
4
4
3
-
4
.
‘
.
a
r
4
4
y
•
mandatory, nor is it meant to be inclusive. The use of t
r
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
materials like brick, copper cod wood is enceurae,ed, but t
h
a
t
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
mean that all bui1din9; wuf..t include these materials. Th
e
c
h
o
i
c
e
o
f
o
t
h
e
r
basic materials Such be at the discretion cf e,Ach proje
c
t
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
,
I
s
u
t
.
subject t:. anproval by the Review Board. Generally, the
c
e
p
r
o
a
c
l
i
i
s
t
h
a
t
,
if brick is ur foeexarule, it shall be the brick specified herein; cr
If metal fa,i;,s are used, they shall be coi'per or zinc. O
t
h
e
r
b
a
s
i
c
exterior r.:.trials (c.o. stucco, concrete, etc.) ray be a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
f
i
t
c
a
n
be dci ,lestratf-e to tee Review board that the usage is compatibl
e
a
n
d
a
p
-
propriate.
(All itus refer to exterior use.)
1. Face trick Appearance - to be selected by the ,curiZ...kep
nMrs004,c4:41..4,
Revie4 Board.
2. Vet al Roofine/Fascia/Spandrel - cooper, zinc or
cor-ten steel.
3, Metal frames/Trim - dark bron:re or brown color
(anodized or painted), Car-Ten steel,
e
4. 1.!tood Surfacinn - cedarishinclesisiding (seal or
- stain to preserve natural .color). .
5. llood frres/Trim - dark brown color (stain or
pLint, reefer forriel•). •
•
E. Pevino - brict: k
ceecrete Dr c....,-‘1,1 s.=
C 77,7.;;‹
7. o.Jte,,,, -interier reed•ay end oari;iee. ar ,:a
,lightieg is to be selezted by the f,evie4 boc.rd wile
regard to initial installation and ulti:7.ate eperating
costs. '
C. 1i,nd5cLpiao.
a. Plcnti , - to be coordinated by the Review
fios.re.
.b. Fornishiens 7 w ,ilkway syste, henrhes!trar,h receptacles,
hued rj1s/fee ,7esi!.crce..-.;;,
beards/lc. (,bove to te dt.sizse:,/seleLted/installed
by owner as appropriety and/or zpproved by Revicw . .
Board). •
9. Gra;,1:;rs/Sioaee - stellar to Landscaping above, GraphicsA
Sigeaee is a th,siqn project in itself. More definitive
standiaes will tve , t.'..velooed as work proceeds. However, it can
be said iSiS the siraoe will be considered to be one of
t
w
o
'Janie typc:.:
6. fcheral - refers to directional informational sicns u
s
e
d
in !.ral throu;11)s Area G of 'the Preserve Cur ,.:ercial
Cent, r (to he de!: it:3:4qt).
- refers to a sin which directs attention to a
t!jirle!,; io ,n the pro,nisx!:. Individual
Iciest if Scat ion 'woos mr.1 s a' AvIty will tn C allOwed , but
sihs's I'd .1 in 11 ,f 5501 Ore. reused 1f1!; si.ri. lecat i(1nS. and
bail 5;1. o o
teliOw., of leven Prairie' u_ siyi,urthn,loce which is in effe
c
t
io; (,n 1 stet of the priject.:n=j-k t.al..! 15V3s.
Staff Report - Area C. -9- Nov.. 2. 1970
• VII. PI.:;Mt4 RLV I i *
i'..
The third component of the Pesten Framework., and perhaps the most important
to its successful irplementation, is ,16..e'fttshuirit pf a standard design
revieo procedure. Desien Review by a",:g.e,-Vi",.:L`.!:41-*"-xn'Preseriting The
Proso.rv4the City of E.den Prprie shall and aport nye all proposed
projects in ;4e-Cr.e..t.e.r.anf4ikc-i-al--C-e.nter. . lie .4.;;;;;tirt;1al I meet at the
request of the individual projet-t developer. Depending on complexity,
each project shall require at least the three htsic steps noted below:
3 Pre-nes i !L t9.: - lhe owner/develop:sr shall submit totit-r.-.(x.
written troct t:;scrirtion, and i n tarn receive a
copy of the Df.sign Fra-,ev.ork The Project Des,
cription should include the following information:
- project location, funct n cn, size, cost,
special requiremc.nts, etc.
- owner/developer contact
- project design tcom
Initial contact and regJest for this meeting should be made
through Toe 64A-1
The proponent's project architect
t to a preliminary design concept
for approval, Graphic exhi bits shou Id include the fol
nvy.;41-4.6
- comprehensive site plan limited to the appropriate
development area in The Preserve Commercial Center
(scale .- 1".100' )
- project site plan
- floor piers
- elevations/sat:3'i
-study rouel or ketch perspect ive
The•Strz-u- via ii nnt be, with the details ar.d internal
workings of thc project cm much as the cverall relationship
of the site plan and building to the remainder of 4-1:c Proscr*e ,•
-Gornser4.L. 1311 nfitt.t.t,t4-r-
t or".4 o_pposia4e- 44.4,/
1 • Final Desins Pevi rL - The project architect shall present to
the itrvie.; final project defign for approval prior
to bidding anS/or cotistruction. Exhibits should include.
worldnu drawings (set)
-specif icat ions
- model and/or serspective
- basic r.atc.rial
- -ell r
44- mlaterfi 6.:4.1. Ere_ .
err ,
Wri:tea approval by the City Staffokeview w-,,,ro member
will be required befe ,. work roseeds., .i.n4e-se—sormii-i-ee4+Y-
ed-4.,-,..LU--ko4--..tA. Shoo: tat variances or exceptions will be
• cons idereci tars is, but permitted only with written
approval !,v the copy of the written report will be
subriittee otic City' f. 121, i I no', Inspector by the applicant
as a part of his build n ng permit application. Pevi6.0
4. Final co.rPr ,v7A .innlpsi.cr .t The ftve'is....-/-fre ,erd may accom-
pany (he Ci-Ys Tospo2ctor at the time of lanai in-
,
5;iec tiOn 10 il!,m.LIrr. Ma reasonable compliance to building
codes and Design framework :-;anual conaitiQns has occurred.
0 feesof a Desi n n Review Board Coosultant, if needed, will be paid by
proponent to cciiclua the fin] review process. The mount to be deter-
m i ne d by the Revirw Roard shall be suf f ic lent to cover costs incurred.
g
Report,Area 6 -1 0- Nov. 2, 1970
Revised 12-1D-To
5. Appeals
The applicant or any member of the Design Review Committee
may request review of any project by the City Planning
Commission. The ccmmission will review the project as it
conforms with the requirements of the Design Framework
Manual a part of the rezoning argeement for Area C. The
Planning Commission's deiesion on the project may be appealed
to the City Council by the project applicant at his pleasure
within 10 days of the Planning Commission's action. The City
Council review and action on any appeal shall be considered
the final determination of the request.
The City Council may by simple majoiity vote review any
application pending before the Design Review Committee.
6. Project Evaluation Reports
The city staff shall prepare a project evaluation report to he
presented to the City Council and Planning Commission by
February 1st of each year during development of Area G. The
report shall discuss appropriate aspects of the development
including nn evaluation from the developer and the city staff
of the Denign Framework Manual process.
/ Ovt4c,,..7 cor",,w, n ', •:.: :7..' -:7, -.LI- \ C 434r% ;n04,4 4 F,1 4.4e , - A4,44444 1,4Pry • " Z, eNc NnS'' • 2044drii OpoOgq re porsoN441 k,^6,44.1 <rim € kasxnh4 p7-141 h r..n.•114.1 .44in o.rt`4. Cr.ra .1.4r semorwl ) Assv-Ved Go.to,r) • 3 <4 , r rut: f ,-•.N 4.''' *° ,:.. 4 .. k") r s..----" ;L i i.1, , V - p Preserve Commercial Center ^ Area "G" Design Plan "A" Mixed - Large 8 Small Buildng Pad Concept 9 Pert.; 446 Ort T• t...* of co opw,.id 4.09, Undsce4.4 I 4: 1Q- tq' a•,- FIGURE "A" The Preserve wOhin end 14v441.9-27.-1941 Sco5.• 100' 7-29-R,6 J L Pct .d Or 0 L 8470 Frank) Rcal [1,4 Pr.)°, M.lotSet8 553 .nC"
- • - 1 ; •;' % , / tINCCIS Pc:11,,p 0 3 - / //t4:: P^14,4 5 1/ O Ass,n01- P0004 ol r-x,1 pads 10 b. used far parting as rs0,7•0 / le' 'roe * Public landstaeg aye - So scrsls as. noted •,1" •.0e4 scz et, a0,n1,e4 *Nu.* 1.r.5.c..0 ,76.n Lonekteft Preserve Commercial Center Area "G" Design Plan *B" IvIoximtim Buildng Pod Concept FIGURE "B" c>, Thz Preserve r.10, 7-20,770 Pf as000 4-27-1576 rI H• • :: •• •
009cter AM! 0.W. 777.1. rwst dpnenci Co. •w Arlo {Serwe ApporH1) . — W :o Nen- 5 ttrs / *00 FA. • A 8 tws / 'Q0 GA. • 13 _ Preserve Commercial Center Area "G" Minimum Free Standing Developoent FIGURE 8C8 I Lot Scheme Th2 Preserve CarnAr 1.AA teve,opment Han-Shorwl Rodin %He • f. 20' Oom 7-284976 O' 8r J LH Itwao4.9.27-1978 jimeareet8 2 LM 8?..20 rra*,.0 Read Eden inattie hfinnenetn 55343 ,..,12n
{ !'• "1 71 • • ;1 • • ? .1 • • 1 L:1 I !!•'-11-r-SG 1,1 1 ftdat L•n•••••••• n••• 24 .q f• P.34.Wq St•pl4 Po•krq 5 cm noco F A • 12 car.:100C GF 4 • 19 -215. F..,14 ROW. Preserve Commercial Center Area NG" Maximum Free Standing Development FIGURE "D" I Lot Scheme el2srinio Gem*, tl Defelopmen, • Nw-54wwt Fer1n141 RewsW1•94749715 SoWt. Dwe • 7•28 122G NNW, Bf • J Apoweed P,• DLH rn:r, P•14:i Eqp., 11....,••n••4•11.3 55343 .711.'1441-1,,
0,:tat.o! R 0 W. hlok CarAwe. Safe z va' Preserve Commercial Center Area "GI' Maximum Free Standing Development FIGURE "E" I 1/2 Lot Scheme Preserv2 Come Lea Dereor•wyl Wdh Sborsd Perking hCqUifiii. 21 -.171. Ste.e-1., 70' OM.' 7-284;471 AM-N.1,11;y t
t•fo) act ft ICE 00' IN r-,•n•• 6n•••••• 5.516•1r.5rot-• 5.5,0 • VI :1..1 3 it I ..... . v . ....r...._,..... r...7..._4 _.7.........„..._........_________ ,..,..,,,_________ ________ t_____ ____Iii.:--;:.,-•,; I ,-1 1.• i' ' f . ....; . . . • I i .-1- - -1 1 I I . . ' 1 ' - --. " n ! 1 ' 1 t ' • 1 • ! " ! ...n.- - ln••:',1 :Yu, /...5, - •,•!,!!!‘ •.., -0... •s!,•• ouvo, . not ....Ws! ..... ! 1 L.I1 ! :r , NI , to to o, . :t .. .r: . fa ., r •-•••1 1 ' . i I ,x511•1••, 3. . .!!' 1 " 1. . i ; '1 ) 1 • !: - ^.1 • - ,• L-.,..::3. 14 1. •.' " ' !. ! ''. ', ''' i '. :! . '-• / r.. 1 K---2--- '''' I ! • • ! ! • • ! ; i Preserve Commercial Center Area wG8 Typical Building Pad Development 21/2 Lot Scheme tfe•E • Ifott1op st•••:s Sr tore of 6111 Cody hove boto osauft•td aim& - 10! a 45! tfoubi• - 101 60' FIGURE "F° T112 k ieservc tt"1.11 IF rao''• Dote 1•76 10T6 1 0, •,- M.. • • 330 Py 1773h3tH Ap••0./1 Ity Ill H
1",..yOr ond Ccia 116 1
i): 1-:o3er Ulstad, City manager
merle Gm, lt,len Prairie Schools Dnsinens Managey
John 0. Franc, C.1 ty Finance Diner:tor
Deoember 10, 1976
EX: ),..::,t-West Parkway Apartments - Selynol Impact
Usinj the following data:
1,01: C,t.: ST ODE ,.:"' COST TO 7DUCATE STATE AIDS
PUPILS/UNIT
S. F.
.02
.17
.07
X $ 752
G-12
1,504
12-18
2,105
rsaa rate of 47.637
NEW
C-I
$ 562 .2
1,042 .5
1,426 .5
PER UNIT
SINGLE, FAMILY_ 0-3 D-4.
Va1ne
$100M $50M $755 9005 15. 33.11.
$1229 $860 $1336 $1533 $133 .'248
(.. giy;r;
n. f
t•4- al
. Cc.,;:t to 7:3in,-.,tt e
IT.VYNUE
1341, 1348 1346 200 2E8
(7.,8) (523) (812) ()1t3 .) (9)..(_15.1)
(745' 8: '%"-.3 21' 207 137
481 1683 1869 2056 340 385
- (1955).. (:,:j5) (1555) (418), _(418)
$481 $(272) $(26) $101 $(7 8) '...(33)
6 -ds arcy daced by this "local of fort" factor
rai C
pltys D
1: loss 1
h o n, vole,-.,/ at 086,600 has a -0- yvt. i.e. it pays its own
n-:ay.
p-I uy,its aye raluivaler.t to S.P. ,.,...)ehd at $76,100, 0-4 at. $82,
1
0
0
.
if thc:o were •i c-hildrea in tile Multiple units as
!,1,own 1 .1,en 11-.1 w,.); t] c.,1‘..,1 . $58,190 and 0-4 at $64,700.
c1,.,1 or.,1 indott x i,,i .:,11,at ion ir.creases always benefit our
1 F::Cturcr.
Computations
New C-I
LMV x 43% x 60% m Assessed
Assessed x Mills $
Single Family
AGE NO. STUDENTS COST EXTENSION AIDS EXTENSION
.2 $ 752 $ 150
$ 562
$ 112
6-12 .5 1,504 752
1,042
521
12-18 .5 2,105 1,053
1,426
713
$1,955 $1 346
LMV less $13,000 x 40% + $3,250 Assessed
Assessed x Mills = $
Multiple Apartment
AGE NO STUDENTS
COST EXTENSION AIDS EXTENSION'
.02. $ 752
$ 15
$ 5E.2
$ 31
6-12 . 3.7
1,504 256
1,042
177
32-18 .07
2,105
147
1,426
100
$418
$288
LMVx 40%. Assessed
AssLssed x mills $
Con^lusion
Assessed $1,955 +
(.047637 - .02 0 )
where y equals the net most
LMV = assessed- $3,250
+ 13,000 .4
14016 Chestnut Dr. #2
Eden Prairie, Minn. 55343
November 24, 1976
City Council of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Sirs:
I mould like to be placed on the next available city council
meeting agenda when the following request coulc be heard: an
appeal of the Zoning Board of Appeals decision of November 19,
1976, to den;:. a 20 Coot setback on lot 2, beek 3, Kings Forest
k&dition to Stevens heights.
Also, if pcnoble, 3 logal nterprAation of a. setback would
prove helpful to me. As a case in point, I would like clarifica-
tion of the setback of the house that sits on lot 6, block 3,
Rings Forest Addition to :At:yens Heights. also, is the setback de*
termined from the front or side of a given house?
Please contact me as soon an possible at the above addresc or
by telephone at 941-3331 or 941-6320 ext. 22?. Thank You.
Sincerely,
Mark Allen Lewis
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John D. Franc, City Clerk
DATE: December 13, 1976
RE: East West Parlway Apartments - City Consideration
Usins the following data:
PER UNIT
SINGLE FAMILY 0-3 12-4
Limited Market Valor 1 .
50M 75M --- 10CM 7M 13'1 _
Persons/Unit 3.3 3.8 3.8 2.2 2.2
A. Assessed x 7 mills $126 $196 $266 $ 19 $ 36
S. Less the Per Capita Limited Levy 197 197 197 114 114
Net Tax Revenue (71) (1) 69 (95) (78)
Net Utility Re:venni:, 0 0 0 48 48
Net Per Unit $(71) $ (1) $ 69 $(47)_ 6(20)
Net utility revenue is based on calculations which indicate an apartment conOtx
r ,4t 4 uslay.45% of the utility service billed to it. (50% use is shown in the
example). Single family units will use about the total billed.
ColIclosions:
Co the base of 7 mills the 0-3 unit is equivalent to a $41,300 S.F. and a 0-4
::nit a $47,400 S.F. A home with a LMV of ii75,200 is a -0- net i.e. it pays
its own way. If we adjust for net utility revenue the 0-3 is equivalent to
a $58,400 S.F. and the 0-4 a $64,500 S.F.
balance of ttic• City levy (17 - 7 mills) OY 10
SINGLE FAMILY
50N 7501 100M D-4
(7i0 (20 S.F. or 129 /1:t. on 9 acren)
$1000M $1500M $20004 6893.401 S193.4M
Annossed x 10 Mi.11.5 $3610 $5610 $7610 $357.1 $6774
The 10 mills are fot the moat part fixed costs such as bonds and interest,
insurance, etc. and the cost of special programs such as tree diseases, our
share of grants, etc. which bonefit the City as a whole. Any increases in
aSSOFtiej Valllatirn1 will reduce the rate of taxaticn for these items.
Calculations:
Sin91e Family
1141/less $13,000 x 40% + $3,250 = assessed
assessed x Mills = $
3.8 persons per unit x 51.75 the net per capita levy = $197 per unit
20 units on 9 acres
Multiple 4partment
LMV x 40% = assessed
assessed x Mills =
2.2 persons per unit x 51.75 the net per capita levy = 114 per unit
129 units on 9 acres
Conclus ions
assessed = 197 +
. OC:7
when y equals the net per unit
LMN assessed- $3250 + $13,000 .4
517,534 the per capita limited levy _ 41% 1,264,625 the total. levy
41% x 17 mills = 7 mills
17 mills the 1977 tax levy
7 less 7 mills
10 mills balance
DATE: November 17, 1976
MEMO TO: Zoning Board Of Appeals And Adjustments
FROM: Wayne R. Sanders - Building Inspector
SUBJECT: Request for variance from required front yard setback at Lot 2,
Block 3, Kings Forest addition to Stevens Reights.(14202 Stratford)
The setback required pertains to Ordinance 135 Section 2.2(c) and is as
follows:
"Where 40% or more of a block is developed, the required setback shall
be equal to the average existing setback".
Jo this case the setback should be approximately 41 feet. Mr Lewis has
requested a 20 foot setback. Mr. Carl Jullie - City Engineer and I looked
at this lot aed agreed that a house can be built at the 35 foot setback.
Attached are sketches made by Mr. Lewis showing some elevations in a cross
section. Some of the facts are:
1.)Eront corner of lot at east side has an elevation of approximately 918.0.
I.) Invert, of newer extended to house line is approximately 913.5.
3. )Additional ti)1 will On needed around house and at entrance to garage.
4.) Sewer can he run high in basement ceiling and out of basement side wall.
5.)A small sump pump can be inetalled in basement floor to raise laundry
weter only up to sewer level.
6.)A setback of 35 feet would establish a setbard: pattern so that:
Lot 1 (corner lot) is 30 foot ncLbck.
Lot 2 (This lot) is 35 foot sceliock.
Lot 3 Next empty lot could be 40 foot setback and blend in with
Mr. Saodvicke front yard eetback, Lot 4 at 44 feet.
Ba ,ed on the above information I v.ould recoenend a variance to allow a
35 font front setbeck.
UNAPPPM/11)
ZONING BOARD OF an= AND ADJUSTLT,NTs
Thnradny, November 18, 1976
7:30 P.M., City Hall
FKESK1Ti
Chairman James Wedlund, James Cardinal,
Donald Loronsen, Joan Meyers
Thomas CebUlla
Wayne Sanders, Building Inspector
OT h • .,!E. PP.ESENT:
Roger Sandrick, hen Nelson, & Mr. &
Nis. Lewis
The ..•:•tirig, was called to order at 7140 P.M. by Chairman Wodlund. Approval of
pa el Minutes was postponed until later in the meeting.
oat for variance from reonired front vard setback at It 2, Block_3 4
itr'7orost POdittor to Ste:ons relents. titratford)
Mr. Levis spoke to his primary reason for the request for the variance,
which' was to hcep the scenic, natural look of the lot, rather than bringing
in fill end turninr: it into a fabircated lot, which would not blend in:
with the iajority el houses in that ores. lie felt that the 20 ft. setback
wruld preserve the beauty of the lot, and elmirete the cost of necessary
fi:1 :f1 015s n.v76 e-ok 01 the lot.
Wedldni inquired as to whetter he owned the lend at the present time. Lewis
datat. he had •-i .nonoy on the lot, sobject to contingencies.
There Was discussion pertainins: to solder, token at previous !seating on
Is: 3 of that aS,-2,ition, fhero, naceb en the fact that 40% of the block had
nst h..eou &:velosed, cia chninnoe ,7is not necessary.
Moyers referred to a aettYr. doted Anust 22, 1976, written by City Attorney
Pc 'by, which contained ins ststanect that it was his undorhtanding that en1V
two of the lots bad been hoilt voon, .nd. that Only a 30 ft. setback was
reouircd, 'aret7oro no verlanoo wns rreuired for Lot 1.
C.,e4crs thht aince 405 is now tioveloped, the required setback will
I'., esual avcrne,c netisick.
3)re-1-en the CfdirAnco acts the setback, and that the old Ordinance set
it Lt r000irn .s.s of the lresont Ordinance protects prior citi-
uha htsfon fr,2]. :inttinq out, he spoke to conavints be had nade
!ion aat moetins:, that he only out out a euery. because the
de:hoition of n block uns do ,hat re:trictiwe as to what the Council meant
for tht irdinonoo.
nuestiche:I. the intout of the Crdinance, and felt that if its purpose was
to protect peole on fInt, lcvel than he did not feel it would apply here
1w cIUSO a narbsi of tbin;ls aro involved that do not block anyone's view.
ard of Ape's...eh% and Adjuetments — 2 — November 18, 1976
Sereneen asked what the contingencies on his offer to purchase the land were.
Leeis answered that they were babed on a 30 ft. setback and approval by
hanneeota ileance Agency.
Soreneen queetiened Lewin as to whether he had been aware of the setback fie
statA in the Ordinance cod whether the owner had made reference to it. Lewis
respended that the owner hed felt that building on a 30 ft. setback could be
done, but that he hod neue no reference to the requirements of the Ordinance.
The nature end extent of the trees on the propeety was discus:led, with Lewis
stetlne that in moving the setback further back, more trees would have to be
deetroved, and more fill would be renuired.
Leeie epoke to two different types of house plans that they were contemplating,
eddine that they would have to purehase the lot before we see what type of
Leuae we can build. Be presented his specs and plans to the Board members
for their study.
The etleont of fill uecesseey was diecue:ed, and Ibwia said that at a 30 ft.
sethaek, 900 cubic yards would be neeeaccording to his builder. Be added
that for a 20 ft. setbael: the only fill necessary would be to fill garage
fret. heeeeent floor level to proposed garage level. •
or the eleehing, enyieg there veuld be rerral pleebing en
ee firnt fleee, with tee :ewer put in haft in baseeent ceiling and out of
Les.e.eee eide eall, with a eeell frarnb. rum insteleen in basement floor to raise
...eiter only le) to ;c-r level. 7..ore wen dieeseeion as to this method,
eel tlen feeuee pcbeibility of being able to add plerbing for a full bath at
the Meer level. Sanders &aid this 'nee been dens by putting in a larger pump.
cee4ented that it ld be very neatly and night fail.
hr. or Rendviek, L,23 Stratford Reed, connented that the 20 ft. setback
woel(l .2et the house one fell width ahead of his hoeee. Be added that he
the roblem of huildLeg back to 44 ft., such as his was, and suggested
o.'1' of eetbeck festage, he egid he ves concereee with the proposed
reeee.e tee- the L0 ft. setheak, and hoped that for his protection, some kind of
teeeel.ee could to worked out.
3 cleerce‘;ed his undaretendiee of Xr. Lewiets rest, but felt a 20 ft.
Ia extreme, and he streased that financial problems could not be considered
le b •,11owine of a varier:ca.
e felted hr. Nelson, 6E:01 Leerour7h, to give his view.- Nelson responded
ire to peeeloes neetieg, end said that the engineer who walked his lot
r(,
30 ft. on his lee and 30 ft. on lot no. 2. He said be was not
Le the :!0 ft. octIck.
Sueeeeel felt that the Bcprd should tehe into consideration the effect of
lrrldaifl prop ,rties, :tat fit.j new ,dderation should also be a basis for
vcion, but that the Cr ..3r,ance ;f3at%irin certain criteria that should be
nt. be :qoke to lets 2, 3. 6 era'. perhaps 1, and what would happen in the
He felt the 0eildihe De;ertment ehould know why we are taking the action.
le.r.r1 of Appeals and Adjustamats
November 18, 1976
win asked if he could offer a closing statement. He said that be had for their
crnoieloratical a evggestion for thee sotback to ntort at 20 ft. and go back. As
yen take u 0160 view from the road, the woods would give privacy etc. and that
ht feels that houses look sore natural thau building on fill.
arre.-d whether it wore feasible that the City require a lot owaer to
ree_tc 1,i)en the lots do not qualify undo/. the Ordinance before they sell.
.e.ectosen coesrentod that he has bold the opinion that in platting property, the
pleeeor should tohe into consideration whether tics lot is buildable. He added
teat cverybody rho buys property is under legal obligation to be knowledgable
but ehat tho rectri etiors of the lot axe.
:227):::Vie: inquired whether it vos ponAble of running the sewer on the back lot
lire. Sander:: responded that there would be rroblans of easement, but rat it
r.i.z1;t be a possibility.
leeet0771Cardinel moved that erinc73n17ebased on the findings that the request for
veri t one does not erceply with varierno , require:eel -It and wou2d cause rather drastic
vereence on teau sotbaces on the block whether the houses are far apart or not, end
of vierrel lack of contineity, we consent to s 35 ft. setback which was
re.:.or ended. by the bidldiae Dcparteent. licyers seconded. Cardinal withdrew twtion,
%died: ew her cc rood,
veethe.e Ote.cis t1d Tee wil_line to ar4 .:ad his suplicettion to 35 ft.
`Leo:cm b n.,1mL ft. but wic ftvi inst ar tifi c i al topocra ,:!1 :7
ee. there we nZstlirtia that if thin were rot possible, ha would
e :ere Voce, ant. on tie,:
Card -7:r1 :toyed tt deny the earlance with the following findings: Variance
(7.. re, cc ,nr ,11.), with eariar r:gtir ..:: oz.1 -e drastic variance) on setbacks
ee e trer tho boo5(e ore fart- eeart or not; there was a visual lack of
Gee --; eit7 : =7e; ' onron :17s fir.iire )enich ei.re; that the etanting of a variance
elere .7teatiord eee ,d. IH": 2, hire. e 3, ccre't -iision Ki.cs Forest, Stevens
ieee; ir not e.istific -: ier oeorrey:hicol. ch.-eagreo in tho lot; it is further
neeri l'ar .V.r along there ore financial consider-
-7 ere; those eoreeloore.tioosc m1:17)::.0d to n looser dogree of variance are not sig-
.:v..; dlv cccsh n Una ;-.rno ..1 re of te.id variance lould constitute a di—
:r, of t;!•:::. cc ouch a deerce as to violate the spirit
-Lbc, Ur;.;Inwice n.;),;... -east intretrete..ion. It.crees.e. Wee:Lund tdcled his findings: As
re-o ,Lor dcgroe of setbroe. 1e:7e, then eeouired by the enthrone() could be senor:related
(Olerlec the roeee'reone haa aacked to cc cc to cono7.der such a possibility; that
toting h row)) a vori.: wouT d (ion,rive odjeleing property owners of the benr.—
1:',.te .•C the leeenance; and by r.7.7:31.: thia wauld he a special privilege
ccc
v danying ebe varianne, it eine.; q net deeriee tr. Ec Mrs. Lewis of use of that
Eey tr,-3 50:1 ,Dade:1, 11).:,1cr. ceeried unanireouely.
leeiod-,_, informed Lewis of h. r. aiternotive actions; to go beezre. the City Council or
eep lefere rc court of :Ir....,
adeed tbet he &Azle etitior for a 35 ft. setback, accept and not make use
of i t ee:10. he chanee M.:3 rend on ita
• rd of Appeals and Adjustments — 4 — November 18, 1976
C)rvnsen added that if it in not acted upon within a year, according to the
(n.dinanee, it will expire.
YO.r,on naked how the average setback is arrived at. Sorensen responded that the
ditre.Lce between side of the house and front street lino is used to determine the
e -;cr7o setLook.
cozr.ntcei that Lewis did havo another alternative, and that is to request
n c.:,tinuance to the next meeting.
fl:J OF !'ail-OTTS OF MAY 20 JUT:F. 57, JULY 15, & SEYT, 24
fort ,esen moved to approve Minutes of above dated meetings. Cardinal seconded,
nen:on carried unanimously.
Mere was discussion or Council action taken during Hamilton appeal, and there was
conern enpressed that the Board wee unsure of proper approach to similiar cases
will be upcoming.
Snrchen requested list of land divisionz, why, size divicion was made, and what
onixo of property was when it was divided. BQ conmented that land divisions are
a pretiem, and nungested that a solution night be re-zoning of property.
L.1:.oessien of Minnesota Trees sign took place.
:c :es stn(en.ed t3:e. i7iertenoe of s.ii.nlations in verian.nlagranted.
• moved to adjourn at 10;15 P.M. Meyers seconded, motion carried.
by ,
7nnno Ctsolny
Serotary
11/5/76
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.111._
AN MINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 135.
TUE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN
Ad FOLLOWS:
Secticn 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by
rn'iding the following:
Lot 1, Block 4, Basswood Forest,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, and
to be known as Hidden Oaks.
wilich property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone
and shall be included hereafter in the RI-13.5 zone.
soetion_7 .. The above descriad proparty shall be subject to
the terms and conditions of that certain Rezoning Agreement dated
_, 1970', eL.teved into between CREST INVES=NT
CoREJ.ATIO, and the CITY or EDEN pRAIrar, which Agreement is
hrFn e hy made s part her -of and shall further ho subject to all of
the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City relating to such
RI-13.5 zones.
Section 1. This ordinance becomes effective from and after
its passage and publication.
FIRST RE;%n at. a regular meeting of the City Council of the
CiLy of Fden Prairie this day of 1976, and
finally read, adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting
of the City Council of said City on the day of
1976.
Mayor
ATTES T:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Published in the Eden Pm a irie News on the day of • 1976.
- 2 -
1.1.,i5/76
RC -AWING ACREEMENT
THIS .7\GREEMENT, Made and entered into in triplicate this
day of • 1976, by and between CREST
17.NrSTMENT C7ORPOR4TIOM, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", and
the CIT7 OF EDEN PRAIRTE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City",
WITNEESETil:
WHEREAS, ownsr has requested the City to change the zoning
from Rural to R1-13.5 for development of land legally described
Lot 1, Bleck 4, Basswood Forest, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, and to be known as
Hidden Oaks.
anc:,
WIEEa.EAS, It is believed that rezoning of said area to R1-13.5
would: be in the phi c's interes t, feel fare and convenience of the
p:-.,ople of the City of Dlen Pra::rie, and
Owner agn:es to develop the aforementioned property
C.J a single family plat, in consideration of the City changing
the T.:ming, and Owner further agi ens that as part of said
ennsIderation, it will lay out, develop and maintain the project
dereinafter net forth.
THEREFORE, THIS ACREE.1,14.'Nr WITNESSETH: That for and in
con:;ilerat ion of tlqi Meyer and the City Couil of the City of
Ednn 'Prairie adopting an or ii inanca changing the zoning from Rural
to RI-13.5, the Wier ngrees; to construct homes on said property
in accordance with the , planning, architectural, engineering and
12i3/76
landscaping requirements of all City Ordinances, sub
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
following conditions:
1. That the platting will be in accord with the plat
attached hereto and made a part hereof and marked E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
.
2. That said property shall he developed into 34 lots
for single family residences only.
3. That prior to any grading being done on the plat th
a
t
the street grades and drainage for the pond locate
d
o
n
t
h
e
proposed plat be approved by the City Engineer.
4. That all streets located within the plat be identifi
e
d
as "Hidden Oaks Drive".
5. That the following sIdeyard set baths be approved fo
r
hocs lecat.id i.thin the area:
5 ft. - on all garage sides
10 ft. Onc-stori.y Icm,e on living arca side
15 ft. Two-stor:iy home on living area side
6. That all sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer
facilities, conerehe each and ci,rttor and bituminoms
s
u
r
f
a
c
i
n
g
vIc;Ier to be public or private, shall be designed t
o
C
i
t
y
staim"n nrds IT a registered Professional Civil Eniincer an
d
sn'hmitted to the City En‘ii %er for approval.
The developer,
t'!Iroll(-711 his en3ineor, rovide for competent daily
of all street z , Linty construction, both public
ash private. As-buili am ,gs with service and v
a
l
v
e
t
i
e
s
o
n
rorcducible mvlar and ceriticatos of completion a
n
d
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
with specifications shalt .ilso be delivered to the
C
i
t
y
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
.
- 2 -
miP/azd
11/5/76
The developer also agrees to pay all fees for City Engineering
and administrative services consistent with current City
requirements.
FURPITER CITY AND PROPERTY OWNER AGREE:
1. That the property owner shall comply with all
applicable rules, regulat ions , ordinances and
laws of the City of Eden Prairie.
2. That the provisions of this Agreement shall be
binding upon and enforceable against Owner,
its successors and assigns, and upon all
subsequent owners, their respective heirs,
successors and assigns, of the property herein
described.
3. That an executed copy of this Agreement shall
be recorded with the Register of Deeds,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
4. That if tioilt:r tr:5 In to proceed in accordance
with this Agreement within twenty—four (24)
months from the 3ah hereof, Owner, for
suecc!,:sors and assigns, agrees
that it will not oppose the rezoning of said
property bock to its Rural zoning.
IN WITNESS GIBTREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused
these presents to 1.,a executed thc day and year aforesaid.
CREST INVESTMENT CORPORATION
BY
I ts President
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municioal
corporation of the State of Minnesot:
By
Mayor
Manager
3 —
050/ 64(I
11/5/76
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The f egoint, instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of 1976 by Carl Kevlin, President: of•
CREST INVi..;;TMENT CORPORATIoN, corporation, • a'
on behalf of the corporation.
,•?-t
Notary Public
PAUL t..
Notary •;:.: County, M4..
My Coramiss:ost •r• 4, S962.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of , 1976, by Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor and by —
Roger Ulstaci, Mayer cf the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal
c ,ri-,•.riition of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
- 4 -
STATL OF MiNNESOTA APPLICATION FOR ACTION GRANT
GOVERNOR'S COMMISSION ON CRIME
PREVENTION AND CONTROL
PAGE 14
--RESOLUTION OF SPONSORSHIP--
gr,rsment. applicantn must adopt and submit one of the following or an equivalent
r-. 1 :(,n.
A. P -solution authorizinp submission of the prant applicatInn and execution of the
pi ant agreement .
Be it resolved that City of Eden Prairie act as sponsoring unit of govern-
(spont;oring unit of governrent)
U n it U ti P ime P reven ti on n milt and grastec fur the project titled Cr to be conducted
-(p-rOject
by Dept. of Public Safety during the period from 7-1-77 through 6-30-78.
f=11=1 agconyi
(duration dates)
Is hereby duthorized to apply to the Cuvernor's Com-
cutlorized ITC-fa
1AL:sion on Crine Prevention and Control for funding of the project and execute such
agreements as are necessary to iuplerient the project un behalf of
The City of Eden Prairie •
7sponsnring unit of govetnment-3
B. C. 110 authorizing sahmIssion of the application onYy. (A resolution atithariz-
ip ,i7 ei.oeuiloa of the Cr6st Agreement must be adopted before the Governor's Commission
Cr grevanilon and Csatrol can disburse funds for the project.)
If. I rcho lA th,t. The City of Eden Prairie act as sponsoring unit of
(sponsoring unit of government)
for the project. titled Crime Prevention Unit to be conducted by
(project title)
Dept. of Puhlic Safety during thc period f rom 7-1-77 through 6-30-78.
(j-ploruanring agency) (duration dates)
U 1 Stad is hereby author i z (A to apply to the Governor ' COm-
(auLhorivcd of f 1.P1)
'•••;:ii;11 on Cr iy,e Prevost ion and Control for funding of the project on behalf
. City .of Eden Prairie •
10,or lity tall:. 01 plIVCCrtuullItY
1 re rt i f y that the above c so lotion Wil6 adopted by the
1,-Iyor and City Council o f City of Eden Prairie
(c,!, niI ;co lntv noard of Commissioners, etc.) (sponsoring unit of government)
(d-rd -i;-)
:
(tit ie)
Resolution 0223
_ (date) j
Witnessed:
(title)
(date)
(date)
LEAA Funds Request . . $ 54,068.00
LAC Funti. Requested. . $ 1.004.00
Other Sources (List):
Eden Prairie Cash Hatch l 28,025.00
STATE OF MINNESOTA
GOVERNOR'S COMMISSION ON CRIME
APPLICATION FOR ACTION GRANT
PREVYNTM AM CONTROL PAGE 2
PHLECT TITLE
Crime Prevention Unit
.1.;ORrG UNIT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
City of fdeo Prairie Department of Public Safety _
. rKJEcT SUMMARY (Sce Instructions) lietc: For a 2nd or 3rd year apyi_lcation, provide
a summary of progress toward accomplishment
of project goals.
This project which was granted 1FAA fund ng beginning July 1, 1975 was
desined to provide a crime prever;tion staff freed from routine demands o
patrol rew,nsibilities. Once separated from patrol duties, crime preventvm
eific.er were able to direst their attention towards citizens most strxeptible
to crimes against persons and/or property. Project goals for the third year
of fuHitg will be essentially equal to those of the preceding years. The staff
will continue to identify crime patterns, denote problem areas, conduct
security surveys, provide public informition ar.,; generate public Sup7W t for crinie prevention by maintaining a high levJ of respnsiveness to the
ccncerns of all Eden Praiie citizens.
At the time of this re-application 16 months o" funding have been completed.
The crire rate for Burglary and Vandalism in 1974 (prior to funding) was 397/100,000
r.H 1 ,167/100,000 respectively. The crime rates durirvj the grant period are as
fml lows:
1, 1975 to Decet,;b.?r 1970
1. 7076 to ur O, 1976
Ot.:•;y to Octubr.w 31, 19'/9
31, 19/6
Pu.YY
590/ 1 06,00(:
509/100,0 00
206/100,000
294/100,000
Vandalism
-62-47700, 000 •
803/100,000
578/100,000
864/100,000
b, cern, the hurglary ra17.: has drm:;:!d substantially during the
t:,1(.r.,0; penn. ilnit iore than wdeqrte1y ful fills one goals in this area.
aia' 60: -:;,1 r.qa hoc irrcrowie. On feel that this is largely doe
'..t• thy foci Olat peer ;fte repov -tiwr timse olIcwrsnrs more often. Tie Crime
1 ,rt ‘,nt Oil tOt icer he stre -,!.ed 111;O:, in orar,r to clear this type of offense
it n,' I . b rt ,ported. f),.r citizens ore bN:inrcinc; to ro.4lize that is is important reyo -t all vanoal ',c rio walla ,- how minor ri attire. This has resulted in an
awn of repor .ted vandalivi over the quantity previcnisly reported, thus the
crime rate. It is alA iif!porti..nt to no to that Edcn Prairie has en approximate
nj ii,, Lion or 10,000, therefore, ,'vary vand:11:sm reported increases the crime rate
. _
st'TVAP.,' AND -;(1‘0::CE'-n •Cl .' Pp.o.n:cr suPPORT
P1,,jvc Cost . . . .
tvd Servi
: t
r (is Li.
I 7177 (.07717.7i
$
Si 7,100 (di
r1/A
825.00
IUP
sil/A
.. '$II/A
I.! 7,592 . 00
$ ilr„or.n 00
N
'1 7 n ,•)
Brli /p.)
/-
EDENVAL ,.!,‘,./EC.
//A l/ EY 'r
/
i ;
Schum..cher
Vie President
2:Ln• EDEN VALE, INC.
7766Mi:chell Roar! • En Manic, Minn. 55343 • 612/941-5300
May 25, 1976
Mr. Jena Suback
108t 69t11 Street
11...toe;;poli s , La 55423
rascreent — Lot 1, Block 3 and Lot 1, Block 4, Edunvale Industrial Park
Dear 1 ,:r. Suback:
It ta CI.... intent of Inc. to ;';,:aut en easement for after 4:00 P.M.
to yr.0 L„it 1,ilot.•I , 11;.,;nvai ,.. Indus:trial Park as seen
c.,;1 -.:01115P vpod LI:: tic Pa ptscutly era /3 t -.intinp, tbe fee title with
Pini:.te Life end CiJualt:: Cor,:n ;t:y and zmticipz.te that it will be a few
owe title is co will enter into an
cv,ont with you in ni.enrci6le fort ,. tatifactory to your attpr'ney and our
rttnpy. 1 trust tiA.s lcttpr tcpre:;ente; our intent adequately so that the
will now parted.
Yours very truly,
whp/jh 12/10/16
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENdLPIN COUNRY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 1225
A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APpROV1NC A IJOIEJR LICENSE TO JOHN
SUBACK AND GORDON ROEUNEN UPON CiktkIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
WHEREAS, John Suhack and Gordon Koehnen have applied Co the City of
Eden Prairie for the issuance of an In liquor license; and,
WHEREAS, the applicants have proposed to construct a building on
Lot 1, Block 3 and Outlot C, Edenvale Industrial Park, Hennepin County,
Minnesota,
NOW, THEEFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie that the City of Eden erairic will issue to the applicants
thcreld an intoxicating liquor license pursuant to Ordinante No. 702, which
license shall be for a bufiding to he coi,strdet.:0 n Lot 1, Block 3 and
eatiot C, Edenvalo Industrial Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, providing
Lie following conditions are met:
A. The building he constructed in accordance with the Edenvale
Land use pl%n, rest -re:vane_ site plan, restaurant floor plan
and exterior perspective as contained in the letter of Mr.
Suback subject to the City Council dated December 21, 1973,
subject. however, to the following:
Aigirogai of the location of the side entrance road
from Partin nrive by the Ciiy Engineer.
(2) That the applicants in constructing the restaurant
conyly with Ottlinance Nos. 135, li3 and 93 as to
specific site devolopment improvements, landscaping
and setback requirements.
(3) That the applicants obtain and place of records reciprocal
0,r:ittiog joint nsc of the parking facilities
betwcen the prop,:,rty inv6Ived herein and the adjoining
property, it being the intent of this reqnlremeta that
these e:',,.:emenLs aro necessary to provide the required
amount of parking space for the building to be
constructed.
(4) That construction of the building be commenced within
Six (6) months and he completed with'n Fifteen (15)
manths from the da1 hereof..
ADOPTED by the City of Eden Prairie this day of
1.9
Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. 'rrane, City Cler:t
TO: huger Ulstad, Mayor Penzel and members of City Council
FROM: Betty Johnson
SU1lJECT: Community Health Services, recent information
DATE: December 10, 1976
The interim advisory committee on Hennepin County's plan'for community health
services for 1976 is recorinding that 40Cper capita be allocated to
Suburban Public Health Nursing Service from the County's 1976 subsidy funding.
The corl:Attee (made up of representatives from the various task forces which
hod input to the plan) further recommends that only public agencies (Minneapolis
Public health, bloorington health Dept. and Suburban Public Health Nursing
Service) be designated as providers of public health nursing service for 1976.
Private agencies (such as Methodist Hoapital) that wish to provide service in
the future will be studied and standards of service will be set during 1977.
Approved private agencies would then presumably be eligible for subsidy funding
for 1978.
Suburban Public Healtn Nursing Service will provide nursing service, clinical
immunization and child services and health promotion follow-up for youngsters
seen at the clinics aged up to B years. This funding of 40C per capita is in-
tended as property tax relief and direct replacement of funding now coming from
comvunities. In other words, Eden Prairie will he contributing only 28t per
capita from its budget toward SPHNS in 1977, rather than the budgeted 68t.
There is no new information about Bloomington, but the memo of December 7 shows
anticipated cost rawje for Prairie.
Nursing
It is recommended than that Edsn Prairie notify Suburban Public Health/Service
of its intent to receive its services during 1976 and to urge the Nursing
ComIlitlee to re-orcan;ze and tn.-n.rient is thinking about provision of services
in the remaining cun:unities of Hennepin County within its contract area.
12ARUSO Methodist Hospital hut a genuine interest in providing peblic health
srvices in Eden Pri.irie, and has a buildine in the Eden Prairie Center from
which to operate, there will no continued contact and exchange of information
with the nospital dncing 19/7 befnre the Eden Prairie city budget is developed
in late sem::..er. Contact will also be maintained with Bloomington and the
comunitins that are raking use of that service.
Mark not Vo Iucr
Yearly Cow,.
$40, 003
$11
$60, 000 $70,000
$18
$21 $11
TO: PAYOR 2ND COUNCTL
RaTER V:,STAD
b:O'Fa 12/9/76
:0:d Fire )Jcpt. Capt.-,) iu ,:tovements
UL the f0112:wia, II,=ed,d Tr,
ete :2;
fj ol 7ruc3:
in
un
(2)
t,Iced Tutere,sr S Ccstr
1970
302,000
7,000
309,000
20,000
12,000
650, 030
50 000
'00 000
, 1;,Ireessful
1979
165.000
215,000 •
30, 000
30,000
410, 000
r e :I 0 1 100 1. IT; rst half of 3977,
.00uld he soli O r T1,e 0rd ,:aorl r'r of 3d77 and f . t quorter
r 7c:5.
1 ,x to finance therc imcrovolae-L'i would rt-:
t.,(t 'r reduccrd by 542,003t..d i
n
p
l
a
n
I
T
)
t
r
e
u
i
h
d
y
e
i
.
r
:
0
1
c
o
s
t
00.
Pff PW(N)
DEC 10 1976
REVISIONS Or A NOPOSAL FOR IMPROVED FIRE PROTECTION
SUBMITTED 10 THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 26, 1976
Prepared Py
Eden Praikie fire Department
,
Ray M4chell, Fire Chief
.7/
Gene Jacuk.ou,'Asst. Fire Chief
Jack 'lading, Director
Doartment of Public Safety
:?! 225,231 ) 215,030 to Central Station 2J3,,021 (l) 012,030 Sta" ;stat:.7,!; 5,01 ( 7.00 (!) (2) 124,000 14=-.7,0 15,(W 7-,Ck (ne.ry (I) 20,123 (I) 20.003 (I) 20,200 111 17 TOTAL SY-3 ,001 S-3,03^),flOC: last ,500 * :n 19.73, at the request of tile City .lana,,;,er, a 73 year ca.:7:al -ft.;provement plan ,,as developed based on ec_.--ent needs pArsoant to comlitj cevelop7ent. The qan:ities of ec;uic.:7.enT. have not been adjusted each year, h04ever, the irdi ten costs h.:1've been uodated regularly. =Ian I: This plan was developed using five year ,-:quiprent needs estimates, adjusted for fluctuations , in resential, cnnlercial development during the past thr..e years. The data used to determine these eeds included total pocuTation, v,7:lue of comr;erclal/ind',.strial a--ens and the effects of our city's sire ( 36 scuare miles) on the response ticT/travel distance questions that must be considered by a volunteer fire depar:,--ant. This prooasal was desiged to upgrade our fire protection caabilities to a level more consistent witn t,,ose of similar cities in toe 7etre area. Plan II: The reduction in total costs indicated in this plan are the result of -evisions in construction of the central station addition and minor chances in eluipment quantities. These adjustments amount to approxi-mately S42,000. The fire protection levels outlined in Plan I would be adversely affected if further equipment cuts are ,lade, if it is advisable to seek additional cost reduction, consideration could be given to deleting one satelite station from the overall proposal and presenting it as an alternate.
sperfed insurance WI!)
Meeting; have been held with a representative of the Insurance Services
Office in regard to planning for a proposed hoprovement.
These meoti my; cerfirmed hi; previous Opinion (see attached letter) that
r;ajor additioks in pumping capacity, the addi tion of aerial equipment, and
decreased travel d istarw.es, would bc requi red to improve beyond the present
c n ass rating
The; indicated Chat ths.se invoyments would very likely change our
rating to a Class 6 or lower. (Lower ra Limp, would not further reduce
iesidential insurance prom;ums) A formal request has been submitted to
the Incur-a:xi. Service: Office for their written opinion concerning the
pos.. ibi it ies of rate reduction and the amount of that reduction.
*If successful in obtaining a Class 6 rating, the fire insurance premiums
in the city would be reduced an aye .ege of 10:,;„
The approx'ind ti so v i nqr, for each !ionic owner would he as fol'ows:
111%10'1
Say imp -,
$0,000.0r, $10.00/year
$N1,01)6.00
13.00/year
.Y.0,00:0C
(;n )/yiii r
,PI. IC)
20.00/year
The ,,av rigs for co.1rt. io 1 or industrial property would be comparable.
11,ised urrioi i in rife( I exc lit'. i ve of any general rate
rode idEo i,v.ordnte coloH!o i
SEND TO; Mr. John K. Harking, Public Safety Director
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE.'
OF MINNESOTA
12 50. SIXTH ST„ ROOM 1229, I.' •NINI.Af()LIS. MINN •5402
7ELEPHO5, IGt: 332.7401
October 23, 1973
PAul k.adpatl. !,oyor
;;;;.en
1 , ,edpatb:
lire Protectioo.
1.4cn Prairi.e, *tiencsote.
teat has hacn sent to oil:4innaseta, fire inauranee cov.paniss
ko,,; ?rairle, insAirztnco sz.,erac esivieing them of the claw-
trO t.L,I29 te CarosJ. uh lass iare ihtluntace claaaifica-
tiou to ell 4..1(.11141e propctrtico tin) corporate liatits of Wort Prairie.
'L'Unrc: iudivieuri CO:ZW:Tr:i.11 pz0r.3tty that 'Jill continua to have a Class 9
to: insurance! clabeit'Lcatt0 atic ro lack of mter nains enc. firs hydrants.
.1.yAteo. that 11.ks been in-
7.1.c c:tl.11-2r cir.f ,A ,sse that perelt the establishment 41f
eet,,onity ch2.rinnc.: to Jevt,lop, wator wyeton iro.ut be extended to encoupess
bo!lt 41Vattg o;l ci.itI 1Ze elm ,YA.8 And firl station ioatelled to reduce
trxeCI.cnr t 1:f13 Oa - CO
inatallation of the tatnicipe.1
y L., nnb:itjt. 1,5 aco;::•idvx:d.
cc,n:-..b .,n,:asto(.1%-.v.!1o!1 the. municipal fire protection, this office
• c.tder that cela hpoly the pro:..er fire insurance cloo-
-cAtio:I.
Youxo ver? truly,
0. J. tioocru, Assistant Supervisor
Public Protcu.tion
5Ernitcus OPFICE
,
OF MINNESOTA
12 SO I:II. T H ST.. NOOM 1229, MiNt1t'APOLIS. MINN. 55402
TEL(.(-110U1. tt112) :537.740
w r IA•1•14401
Augtst 15, 1973
TO: ililsoTA CO:.;PANIES
EDEN PRAIRIE, 111:,711ESOTA
(llonnepin Comity)
FUZE INSILTRANGE CT.ASSIFICATIC ,N CHANGE
August 15. 1973
ThP. insuranco classification is chanced from Cli ..as 9 to Class 8.
peltorAl. rate ro*Ion and for nppMcatioil to exist:i.ng policias, the pro-
the in :iota Rule nook nhould beiolltv^,,ti.
An fH.:;,ectioo and rating of all rated properties wr1.1 ho accomplinhed and new rates
atJ inked with all oIf.c t.iv oint if Aui;ust 15, 1973.
IS i n:.nt tint polio -ion, daily topurt ,, biedr!rn, etc, include the street ad-
0,1 Edon Pr;iirle, 1.iii;,:-cot a in it propel ty I,,cntionn dc ,:cription. For rates
in dwelunz prop,rt y re f,r to in:wra:,, :7 *.f•rv! cvs Off Ice of bifunonota,
32 ilnib yccit, Ruoia 1279, Hinc ,,,rolis, Minno,...wt a, 55402.
W. C. FREITAC;
1.1.anni;or
A PROPW,AL FOR IMPROVED 1114 PROTECTION
IN 1111- CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
hewed Dy
Nen Preirie Dire Department
Ray Mitchell, Fire Chiof
Ciur fipn chief
Jack Necking, Director
Dnpi. of Public Safety
!";11111il la ry
Thi: Edell Prd irie F i Pepartment , who is cltarvd with lire Protection
ret,p0e-,thility in thy city, hciieVCS en uilent act'd exists to improve
our protection capability.
A proposed invrovewnt project involving procurement of additional
tire apddratos along with Leo satelite ffte stations and al, expansion of
Iii existing central fire station is stmgly recommended as a necessity
if present protec or capability is to la2 maintained or improved in
light of present and projected development within the city.
Pelays in approval of the proposeU improvements would result in:
1. Erosion of existing fire protection capability.
?. Increawd cot.ts tor proposed hprovement.
ldiLitI MIK I I I MII41 S CI I V MINCH Ce11N.CA110N
Ak:; AAIVA1 01 I I; I 0 Wia%1111 I 01 WI CI L II VI NiCISACY TO
1bl
III ;fit f IN POI ICI ION KI.rUNSI6IIIIIIS 10101 YOU HAUL ASSliALO TO
lio 01 l'ART .
-2-
Proposed 1 re Protvelion Improvement
The following is a summary of the major items in the proposed
nrproves,ent along with th!: reasons h,:eded.
I. Buildirqs and Equipwont
1 -- 3 I ,.ay Sato!' to station located in the Hicillway 169-Valley View
ROOd dr-Ca
1 -- 2 Bay Sateli le station loulA in the County Road 4-West 72nd
Street area
These stations are necessary to reduce the required travel distance
froni station to high ceiuo and high population density areas to more
1hr-' 1 -1/2 mill! ,Jaxiwum specified by the insurance grading
schedule. They will also provide housing for the additional fire
eguipsient needud.
1 -- Addition to existing fire station
fhis aritii Lion is required to • rnvide adequate training space for
sr‘o! oz,:l dim; rt.nor ,e, i.iI as storey , and office
c. n c,c.,,LF.Dry f or o il icieni operation of the n re D:iparttot,nt. Tentative
J i tee tu r,' 1 conce.jts also i iii ca te that it could economical ly he
.„11L.Itel for city employees and
1)1 the arne.
111:..;n • i are , in aclaitinn to ornsontly available equipment.
siiirfy -Ow itatod present fire flow regoiresoents as supplied by the
e ant,, !Wr.viees nueu with only a smal 1 margin for growth.
1 n:11 .ass F i re 1 rua
1 Heavy Rescue Truck
aff Car
i lovas ro nood ,!d to iql;.H ,Ve, dopartns.nt cdpabilities and to
.iihJte the !wed of iirp departrnmt off iccr:. end men tI lizi ng personal
les I or (iITOrtn10111. WOrk
-3-
CosL
Cost of the proposed improvements based on current architect's
ehates and equipnpat manufacturer's quotations, is $980,000.00
exei,,,,ive of 1„nd tor the two satelite stations.
lireakdown et fotiewt,
3 Bay Satel te Station
2 Bay Satelite Station
Addition to Existing Station
2 Pumpers
1 Aerial
(.0-0y; i ire !ruck
I Heavy Rescue Truck
1 Staff Car
145,000
124,000
302,000
160,000
215,000
12,000
15,000
7,000
980,00a
Expected Insurance Rating
Meetin9s have hcon held with a representative of the
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
Services office in regard to the planning for the proposed improvement.
lhese meetings confirmed their previous opinion ex
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
the last rating in Eden Prairie that major additions
i
n
p
u
m
p
i
n
g
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
,
the addition of aerial equipment, and decreased travel distanc
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
be required to improve beyond the presont. Class 8.
In discussing this proposed improvoment they indicated that it could
result in a Class 6 (which is the lowest possible rate f
o
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
property) and ot .icred to provide a written opinion if we submit a fo
r
m
a
l
request.
If successful in obtaining a Class 6 rating, the f
i
r
e
i
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
oremiwr, in the city would he reducc, an average of lfr as compared to
the present Class 3. Based on the 2'/, fire insurance refund to the fire cipartment relief association this would amount to
a
s
a
v
i
n
g
s
o
f
$
5
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
per year in insurance costs to the residents of Ed
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
w
h
i
c
h
w
o
u
l
d
partially balance the cost of the huprovement.
11n , cost brva down in savin for the how owner would be as follows:
Insurist Vii ii. (i.e.., 6
SVioo.n
S60,0D0.00
16.00/year
20.00/year
The e -llect on cc:!rTcsicial or industrial property would
b
e
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
t
h
e
som prcentage.
-5-
Pro,j ,e/ td Future Needs
With the propo7.ed additiorwl equipment and stations at this tithe,
a , feel that we Cdll furnish the city wilt) thlegliati , I ire proteution.
However, the need for ;Here pumping capacity will he needed when the
i tV l4)j d i la t ion near., 1!,.(00 net the commorc la I and Indust ria I develops
It where WC IlVed hO PUMP I e qCOPdC I (Y•
We feel that this might, occur in three to five years or more.
-6-
hackground
fire protection in [len Prairie prior to 1967 was very minimal,
being supdlied in vat ous areas of the vi 1 laee under contract
arratiqMOHLt by Hoof ins, Fxcelsior and Shakule fire departments.
Hr.' protection as dett ;tinned by the Insurance Services Offices Class
10 rating which existed at that time is considered an unprotected area.
In 1066, throngh the efforts of incumbent Mayor Osterholt and other
chnco-nel parties, investigation and organizational activities were
hogun in establish 0 volunteer lire departaloa within the village to
provioe hotter fire protection and to elimiimle the increasing outside
contract costs. This et fort culminated in the organization of the
Eden Prairie Volunteer Fire Department in March of 1967.
Through the signif joint efforts and expindi tures of the Eden Prairie
vi 11.1ge/c i ty cchnic i I ( (tooled with doodlotis of limey and equipment of
the (11:11 1 1 1 ,4.1 ii in 10!1•4 (.1(11( 4)11(1 IllnIkir0111( others, the department has
progressed to the point ot having a central shition with seven trucks and
varioes other firelight ing equipment. This progress has resulted in
improved fire protection capabilities as indicated by the present Class
8 insurance rating.
While recugrmi z irry and appreciating the progress which has been
oede in
improving fire protection within the city, the fire department
t-ts duy hound to p'nt out significant irtprovoments whieh
urgently nreded if the present level of protection is going to be
1.1 I nt at Ord or baproved to the level of the sureoundin4 suburban
( imoeuIII
he ',hater i teiti. ol de f 1( nun y the ex nq I ire protect ion
test ace: I ) 1 ltdd!'qtid h. Outliving (WT i ty in eclat. icnn to reou i red
tire flow; %I lock of aerial equipmeot which is required for fire
rescui and hr coo areh building fires; 3) Excessive travel distances
fr ,ni fire station to nigh value tlrea. Another factOr yhioh indirectly
lire protection capabiiity is severely overcrowded training
etlities.
The need for toTlitional equipment and stIlions along with expansion
ot the existing station nds been previcwsly outlined in the annual reports
!roil Thief Mitchell to the Council since 1971 told has reached a critical
iii it i.;v il ii irt iii' I (10/1 Pt•:ri rip Center last spring along
ci;11 outserons ottn r hint' scilutt developnents h have occurred and will
igna log within the cm, years whith wil 1 he required to procure and
ohne the imorovemcnts in '.0YViC.'.
MEMO TO:
MEMO FROM:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
December 10, 1975
COST Of SALARY ADJUSTMENTS
& CONTRIBUTION'. 1976
GENERAL
PUBLIC SAFETY
PUBLIC WORKS
P.E.R.A.
Adiustmentc, F.I.C.A.
30,300
3,700
13,760
2,240
16,830
1,970
60,890
7,910
Single Insurance Coverage Increase
Total_
= $34,000
= $16,000
$18,800
= $68,800
$ 5,400
$74,200
COST OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS
& CONTRIBUTIONS - 1977
P.E.R.A.
Adjustmonts F.I.C.A. Total .
GENERAL $ 28,800 + $ 3,600 $32,400
PUBLIC SAFETY $ 13,000 + $ 2,200
PUBLIC WORKS $ 15,700 $ 1,900 = $17,6..0
$ 57,500 + $ 7,700 = $65,200
Single Insurance Coverage Increase $ 6,900
Total to be transferred from $72,,100
1971 Budgeted Surplus
VV. /1:411 AN Pcnstx
C. HA ,Ivr.Y
C.IrolN,..
LAW OFFICES
PCIRE3IX, HARvCv, SIMONS 8c 'THORFINNSON
A PROCEODIDNAL N.SOCIAT6ON
MAILING ADORGSS•
P. 0. 00 ,1 ISO
HOPKINS. MINNLISISTA
Dece,ber 10, 1976
SITISEti
17 TENTH AVC. SOUTH
MOINO,/, MINN.
0315-4400
7525 MITCHELL ROAD
EDEN PRAIDIC. MINN.
541-13803
lion. City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55::1+3
Gentlemen:
At the Council meeting on December 7 you asked whether or not the
City could legally purchase a large tract of ground for park purposes
htving in mind at the time of its acquisition of re-selling a very sub-
stantial portion of the property because the entire tract would not be
used for park unrposes. The reason for acquiring the tract being that the
relict wants to sell the 1,roperLy as one parcel.
Under the general statutory powers of the City, the City amongst its
many powers does have the right to acquire by purchase or condemnation or
othordise real. proprrty. Likewise it Ims the power to dispoce of property
List it no longer oeedS. The law pretuppores, however, that the City in
accoiring :die property is doing it for a valid public purpose, i.e. park,
Coo not with the intention of re-selling the prepez -ty. The Attorney General
has ruled that a village cd.uncil is limited to acquire only that property
as is rcasona of y atecied ler the purpose for which it intends to use it.
There are potentially further conflicting rules where land is
ostensibly acuoi.ccd for park purposes, A1thWu0 must courts have ruled
thaL vhere land is acquired without to r.occific deed restriction it can be
di sp,,Ted 0 E, all courts do not unanimnurly agree with that theory.
It is my opinion that if the City is nosireus of acquiring the :To-
talled Deaver property it ought to acquire only that portion that it intends
to ii^e as a pork and if Deaver is not desirous of subdividing it, the
City ought to atqu ;re i t through condcmation.
Very truly yours,
liARVEr.., SIMON'S 6. THOREINIZSON, P.A.
/a4e.„.".
H. Harlan Perbix
jIm
MEMORANIM
TO
FROM:
PE:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Roger K. Ii] stud, City Manager '
Marty Director of Community Servie 1q J
Wtro Par=t & Opcn Space Co.:Jilission Draft Capital Improvement
Progral.,
Decendier 10, 1976
Attache ,.' are 2 piZAFT RESOLUTIXZS :-oncernin ,:, the CIP. The "public hearing"
was hc.la N-eember 9th with the record staylnp open for One week--to December
16th.
in the ClP that affect Eden Prairie:
Parks in Ydrli Fr
Andursoi, Lakes
Bryant Lake
Lake Riley
Aequ..sition
$446,000
$1,682,1,00
TOTAL $2,C29,f;0-J
Developm ,..nt
$500,000
$920,000
$1,420,000
Trail Accui ..7,401).000
Ihis 1:1w;ey 1.,!. Tot L,a 1cent:ions or corridors and might
be avaiInL:L. fct PAI ,Lory Crf:oh t:r olhca !'den Prune Trails.
It is important to note thit expenditnrel are spread out over a
5 ye::1 poliod rnd Metro noli:ies_coerni::ii;
parkF and 1 n .r, der ,1 II and w:len a LIP is apo -!o n ad by the Idetr61 ,oliza.: F .oposal till bp , to the LcOlature for
ddit ,atiorc'' to imple..:e.11 the Park Sy-tem. It is unlikely that t)2 entire Cl]' would bc .1:ended by L .egislaln,e and thus that all of the
priurtti t:onld be accomplisht-i vilhtn the 5 year period. The tvi items
of highet prance to in the CIP in Idea Prairie are acquisition of alec
!iron nrr.pert: Lt kryant Lake and reimbursenq.nt or the Schaitberger property
at Lake Ili Icy
A couple it people have queltionA Pier. Prairie's ability to mallage parks fundod from outsiz1c berausc tie' City wil: not be able to
regulate the any of the park. lea, to smr extent, the City rust agree
to do cc.. ,ain net di!,:t1;7-nntc accordirT. to race, color, or
national oric..n and nory -all utlity :.ervice. Dot, the CiLy can't discriminate
on thee hahis anWly.
Via n.ann;p:,:sont plans for the Y. pa 'Is have Leen demeloped in the form of
MATITR arc rcyliA,L'. in o,.der zn be consred for inclusion
in thr Sync a, 211:J were approved by the :ity Council in June of 1975.
Page 2
Those p1 ans ol,e to the facilities to be developed, their capaciti es, and the way in 1.hich the facility would be managed nod operattd. Ihe
plans were dev ,loped Is the City and the City also Juts the responsibility for carrvii! rimn out.
The one re-,olution deals only with Lake Riley Park and reflects the
recomint .ndatitni of the Parl;, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
from t heir De ,.:L.mher 6th incetim!. The second re lotion is supportive
of the iunicr:,on Lakes Park and Bryant Lake Park.
CITY OE EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A N;SOLUTION REGARDING LAKE RILEY PARK
filfRUAS, The 19US Geide Plan shous a 60 acre Comwnity Park at Lake Riley
un the ,Incquos property.
bGIC.S, In April ef 1974 Ken Schaitherger contncted the City concerning
his (1(..ire to null Doien's Resort 'I Its led to a study of The entire Lake Rile;'-
:!:itTiwIl Lake arcs and three park options very developed. The Parks, Reereatiol
and
N., wail Resources CeT7Dission recoi,ocilled a ":.:00 acre option" to the City Council.
On June 10, 1975, the City Council approved an option to acouire the Sehaitberr
proporty per this pl;,n. OP Julio 24, the Council approved the filing of an
application Cr 1976 1.:'.17:CON fundinf, to assist in this purchase. The Schailbert,er
option u2s appioved an,..; signed in July
WHERFAS, The application for 1976 (ANION Funds wns not. approved be.eause
Netroiwlit;.11 Council, in reviewin T';e nppleation, detemined that Lake Riley
should be iiicludedin ILe Metropolitan Regional Pnrk System.
MEREAS, Con ,itera with this position the Metropolitan Council included
$1,a82,S00, for tho purchase 02 the 260 acres at Lake Riley, in their 5-Year
Capital Impc ,vc7aent Prorzrn based on City Council action on July 22, 1971
approving the l a st e;' PI;71 far Lake di ley and dirocting the staff to forward this
pInn to tho Metro Council for action and fundini.
biln.PEAS, On January IN, 1676, (hi' Co77nell expressod it's ,dipport for The MeteoF:litn5
Par n ,s and Oprn Spece S-Yeai - Capitrl Impr6vement Program including acquisition of
the Lals'e Riley Park nreil.
,...FAS, On ;Ireli 2S, 3976, the City Ceiincil adopted Resolution No. 1106 expressing
seppict foe le•:,-•s1;r: ivy oe'L ion 01 Ii, lerr000l it“s iO1.II I.p, Proposal for the
Cap; al liprove7i2111, ',n•wiTaa Tlyis legisla .,ion was never considered by the 197o
liii REAS, In of the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District WDS
Dill'9D iit,!j :MCC j71 rreCi!asia .r, the Sella.' t berp,er preperty. They did
ee to pay f.6"„ Of 1 .,;L: piirch;11 ,.(..‘ pr cc 11011c0 a 10:5 ;vrocii n crt to he repaid if sad
uhen !Actropolitrn nocame iv:. (ails for this parcel.
L'imr.nv.,,, On Nov 2T,, 1276, the City Council voted to reconsider the Enke Riley
plan i n '10 pr,?v de a ty Park with Lake ill Qy 1)515150 for the usLi
anj codconience pi...i712r .ily to the southwestern population of the City of Eden
:1 1'' while al Ihe S;A:,! lime approving, in principal, a cooperative agreement
W:.C,cr!.h(J DisLaiet fOr it:; purchase.
rF iT Thal the Couacil of the City of Eden Prairie
N' 's reHuc-..1 Thu: 1.21, Riley lie deleted from the Metropolitan Regional
rfyL !;y:,to:o wit!1 the nlider-:.oulin Thai' the City will acoire a C.:i=unity Park
of 1,, 1:2)ye 1h2o n‘re.7. This done rec,uoriiiinn th,t by so doing Eden Prairie
eli!1;bility for 1007 keional Park Fonds thru the Metro-
polil20 kit that the posuifility of 1e1er:71 LAbCON or other partial •
penjin11 fort her planniq application and review.
ADOPTEP, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this
day of
, 1976.
Wo1fLlang H. Pen:7e1, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Tram:, Clorb SEAL
DPAFT
CITY OP EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESO1A
RESOLUTION NO.
A R;.::0'.1UlON WITH PT.SPECT TO TOE METEOPOITAN COUNCIL'S 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMRCYJP ,IliNT PANKS
W11 1 :!*A!.;, the 1 ,*crt rop , 1 it an ParLs and Open Space Co;..!!!ission is charged with
the of a Sy:;1 t 1 .0 plait for ti C1011:11 roc: cation open space; soil
WlinFAS, the City of Eder Prairin has spplied for inclusion in t
h
i
s
s
y
s
t
o
.. plan Cu.: the fj.tes at Anderson LaLcs and Bryan': lnke; and
lqihKEAS, the Metropolitan Psrks and Open Srace Cot..Tission hes
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
t
h
e
n
o
in thoir draft CiTital 1Nipr00eNenr. Program for 1(1.,', financing to compl(le the acquis n tioa of those sites nod the developnont of recreational facilitic
s
thuon; now, thorefore,
Br IT 0.SOLVED, that the Council of the City of IAen Prairie does
h
e
r
e
b
y
supr.,.rt the Nchropo'it;:n Council's S.- Y;:ar C:tpital liaprovenient Progra
m
rels n .ivo to the Anderson IiitLt,s Park sod gryant Lnle Park Othin the
C
i
t
y
o
f
!:don Prairie and does cotta it the iv.)lementation of these pars under thi.; tj!=cing plan and as per the Maser Plans of these sites,
w
h
i
c
h
L
d
e
n
e has previou:Ily suL:Litted to the Metropolitan Council.
Anonlh, hy t.o City Conoci of Eden
dsy Of , 1976.
Wolfgsir,; Penzei, Mnyor
0. Franc:, C
SEAL
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUF3EcT:
Mayer Penzel and Members or the City Council
Roocr Ulstad, City MenaT2r
Carl Jullie, City Engineer
December 9, 1976
Hidden Oaks
PROPOSAL; The Preserve and Mr. Carl Kevlin are recuesting City Council
approval of the final plat of "Hidden Oaks." This is a 34 lot
single family residential plat (R1-13.5) located east of Basswood
Road and ncrth of knderson Lees Parkway. This w 11 be a replht
of Lot 1, Flock 4, Basswood Forest.
HISTORY; The Preliminary Plat was approved on October 4, 1976, per
Council Resolution No. 1196.
Zoning to P1-13.5 was finally road and approved on October 5, 1976,
par Ordis ,ire 1L. 344.
The Final Plat sow salo-;ittied for approval conforms with the approved
Prelimlncy Mat.
W.RTAt;:_T.S: Wriance froi, the minimcm lot size and side yard setback
regilirtas of Ordin ,inoe No. 135, Section 2, should be allowed
as follows:
5' Garage to s.le lot line.
10' 1 and u isstory house to side lot line.
15' 2 story house to side Jot line.
30' Front of building to f; ant lot Jine, except
.25' on cul-de-sacs.
20' Rear of house to roar lot line.
20' Side 'rd setliai'r, for houses built on
corne) lots, but not conflicting with
30' setoacks on adjacent lots.
50' Minis ii from any building lire on NSA,
County and Stale highways.
Fireplaces and overhancs shall not be considered
as setback encroachments.
Accessory structures shall not be placed in the
front yard and shall be 5' minimum from side and
rear lot lines.
UTILITIES AND STREFTS: Municipal sani.tary sewer, watermain, storm sewer,
concrete curb aria gutter, bitomincmc surfacing and street signs will
be installed throughout the development in accordoice with City
standards.
Private sewer ejector systems will be required for approximately
five lots. This will minimize the arount of grading and disturbance
necessary to construct homes on these lots. The ejector systems
will be owned and maintained by the property owner.
PAP DEDICAT7ON: This plat is located within the Preserve POD, therefore
no park dedication wi • I be required.
BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit approved by the City
Attorney shall be posted in the amount of $197,800 to cover the cost
of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter,
bituminous surfacing and street signs. Street lighting will be
installed upon the request of the developer or homeowners. It is
pr000sed that the cost of such street lighting will be billed to
each home,wnox in the subdvision in conjunction with the sewer
and water killings (est. $1 25 per month.)
11!'701INSNDATISN: Reeortpont approva of the fjnal plat of Hidden Oaks,
subject to the requirements of this report and the following:
1. Execution of the "Developer's Agreement."
2. Satisfaction of the bondil revirornents.
3. Receipt of fee for City Engineering
services in the amount of $1020.
CJj.:kh
December 14., 1974
CITY or EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUT:ON NO. 1224
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL
PLAT OP RIDDEN OrirD
iiIHEYmS, the plat of Hidden 0,1::s has been submitted in a manner
requited for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 402 o the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly
had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City
plan and the regubftions and requirements of the laws of the State of Minne-
sota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, T ,IEREPOR , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY Of
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Wroval Bequest for Hidden Oaks is approved upon Com-
pliance with the recaraendation of the City Engineer's
Rep,rt on this plat dated December 9, 1976.
D. That the City Cler:i is hereby dirc.:ted to file a certified
copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of
Deeds and/(.r Registrar of Titles for their use as required by
NSA 462.356, Subd. 3.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
cony of this ReroIxtion to the owners and subdividers of
the ahove named plat.
D. That the Mayor end City Manager are hereby authroized to
Execute the reititicate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEAL
Jeha D. trace, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PFAIRIE
111,FRK' S LICENSF, 'aPPLiGi.TION LLFT
Leeendier 14, 1976
CONfCTcJi MULTT LY C COMM .
Geahir..e'.ion, Inc.
CONT 9-01( ( 1 2 rAPILY)
Signature
The Gent.,san 2re.
HEAT7NG &
A. Linder .2, S91, Ise.
Metalers Cozporation
3.2 F;Fr.R (Fr.7 1977)
Ce(iui Bills
Dcefl & Mrs
CIG!.P 7 :TTL & TDRACCO (For 1977)
Donn & Mercies
Eden i'rz,i1c. Grocery
Eden Prairie Legion Assoc.
Lyons Tap
Wye Cafe
Lyons Tar:
OlymIcic 1 ;i1ls Golf Orli)
Wye Cafe
3.2 (Fo ,r 1 ,177)
LYCfl & Marti,,4
?.den Prairi e Grocery
CC ft Proj to Leqiun To7Goa.
Lycns Tap
Wye Cafe
'Ihese /icele.cS have )7›,,es plOVOd by the department head responsible
• Ger the 11 ,..nsed t Ly
II
1.)
• • , •
lo Quornen,An, DelLy Cie,
CF.
December 10, 1976
SATE 07 :10!:•:„
:.11)'
C01.17 1-n.' (iF
acr.ourUrna; d i ted allowed 's fo1iow;-
I
Tlr•
Bond payment
Postage for meter
Reimbure cash fund
Taxes On Gri 1 1 property
Employees withMd and employer
contributions 11-26 payroll
Donations withheld 11-26 payroll
Taxes withheld from 11-26 payroll
Postage for utility bills
Taxes withheld for Nove.Ther
Service-Public Safety dept.
Electical services
Electl:ni services
Bond paymnt
Safety uniforms-Fire dept.
Lawn sprinkler-Pack dept.
Equirent parts
az96.7"-1, (-Sign-51--eet end ;43-i.r:r dept.
Stud gun ;nd sewer crpe
ees-!%cforestaticr, ;project
Equipment arid -Prairie Vi,:-:
project
Basketkal 1 ,;ff icial
Mini rink loose
Mini ink lease teLar..LL-
Equip,H]gt, Nn-ts
Tree si:ade rertal P
Rent0 services for football
Equip eat p•arts
Mini yin!: leas
Services
Mini rink lease,
180,376.2'
500.77
2,400.6
4,449.7,1'
2 ,).4 6
4,906.5-1
65.77
18.03
18.(V,
289,166.,
1 ,187
45. S2
68.
2,1,01.
12,71
1 , %Ob. G.,
10.0 5
202.L.;
160.4?
2,173
7N;,.13
30c!7
3Or'n
3C6!
3101
1U3
3102.
31 1 ;1
311,7.
!.!
3.1eP
3111.
3';1
31
3.13
.11 51
31.'2
31.13
3'1'31
31 '1' `3
31:3'
31 '37
113fl
31"!1
3
City 1976 contribution 13,97 .153
Nov. and ',Pc. services
Suppl ics-Pobl ic Sufety dept.
5100d alcoh ,41 test-Public Safety
liovell;'oPc expenses A S .
Matrial /4/ .4-4 217,1
lire.s for equipment 96.3;
EmnInvees insuracce
14-14-47-
386.1 .;e
Supplies-Public Safety (1E:pt. 77.
RF.610 repairs-fire dept. 97 .0
Refund nverpayme.:!nt of assessvent 3/1.?“
Office supplies
Mi1eac 9.67.
Mini rink lease 1.0O
liomstt .(d appl icatiooF.-Assessing 46.7
•
IT 41.4, 110.4
3 114-4";:l
313.) HOPKINS DODGE
3134 JEAN JOHNSCA
3135 JEWELL NURSERIES, INC.
3136 MARTY JESSEN
3137 CARL OULLIE
3' !8 JANSI AND GIBSON
313 LIZ 51.510
3110 KOKESIM
3 1 41 ROBERT KERN
3142 KRAMERS HAW:ARE
3143 JOHN LATZKE
3144 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INLORMATION
SYSTEriS
3145 LACAL CO., INC.
3146 MICHAEL mum:
3147 ROBER -1 17iJ7
3148 11:NNES01 .1. 6L4. OF EMPLOYMENT
SERV:Cis
MINNEWA 1E53E1TI0N & PARK
31 P0 METRT 1 9LITAN ANIMAL PATROL
MLOCETER kFALTH PLAN
3152 311 70 ..17000 PRODUCTS
3153 VOID :HECK
3154 IH5 DAVIS CO.
311 -5
3156 8I00631 157 SILT 6087.
3157
METN6i PPIH11 -1
3162
BRIAN 110111. :7
3159
THERESE 8CEr ,!..7
3160
MAYV1U.'
:151 JERR13r2E! MILLER
3152 MINNEWCO
3163 NORTH'S 8 LATIOAL I0111;
3164 N0RTHEST14: ':10EAL BANK
3165 NOR= 0 1 1A11 11 5 WHIR
3166 11:17:1•11LE0I:.ER BELL
3167 00166L7 FILHA
3162 P! 110111 AR1PAISIRS. 186.
3169 DICK 111810:,1
3170 111Y51C1ANS 1:LAL14i 15101
3171 PII'NEY
3172 EAKO FItH4L!75
31 7 3 PE0SI-001J. HI141116 CO.
3174 N. C. 1118187 co.
3175 RIEKE-CAREat-WiA:R ASSOC.
3175 SUN 85811875
3177 STAJI 17 IIINLISOTA
3178 11I11115 6011E
3179 E0N1B87.6144970
3180 WW: i;;8
December 10, 1976
Equipment parts 77^'''
Mileage
Trees-Reforestation project
November expenses
November expenses
Appraisal services-Park dept.
Gymnastics aide
Football trophies
Mileage -
Supplies
Mileage
October and Novemher services
Supplies for garage le-0(-A•'‘
Gym leAer
November services
Unmploy.ilent charges
Dues-Park dept.
November services
Employees insurance
Copy machine-Public SafPty
Assessment forms-Assessing dept 65.80
Broom-Palk Maint. 214.6
Asphalt
(School to reim 1eerse 873.38) 915.ee
Services-Public Inforeation
Gym lea6er 48.8e
Gymnastic instructions 282.0e
Certification of radios to FCC
rules 112.02
Mini rink lease 1.05
Services 878.4e
Bond service charges 77.87
Bond payment 119,973.2
Services, 62.6e;
Services 306.7/
Mileage 39.10
Appraisal-Krahl land parcel 650.07
November expenses
Employees insurance 2,253.8
Office Supplies 21.67
Camara battery‘Public Safety . 35.00
Employees e6o 94.3e
ID card-Public Safety 1.0e
Services-Westoate E Add., Minn.
Protective life and Preserve Arca
I Div. 2,433.6
Subscription-City Mall 7.00
City pro-rata share for administer-
ine social security coverage 28.0
Basbetball official 24.Ce
Mini 'ink lease 1.00
Expenses 50.7e
32.60
5.73
2,700.00
1013.25
102.00
800.00
90.30
51.46
38.09
284.86
15.13
1,944.4
52.80
103.45
40.10
508.11
70.0
JUDY SKJ[L
DONNA STP:LEY
DENNIS gARI;
SUDUREAN ANTO ELECTRIC
ED SORENSI1
W. GONPON S411 -11 CO.
LIZ TRACY
TOWN'S Err FORD (1 ,,,....
ROGER ULWAD
VALLEY I6U1N1ENT CO.
December 10, 1976
3191
333?
31;2
3: .6
3127
'3122
3190
31R1 VALLEY HILL NLIRSEKiLs
3192 SANDRA
3193 WESTERN LML INSURANCE
3194 LOREN 901.1.11
3195 WARNING tiltS, INC.
3196 DONALD WHITE
3191 WATER PRODUCTS
3192 XEROX C;-)P,P,
3199 JOHN 9093901;
3200 SULLIVAN SEPTIC SERVICE
32O1 CURTIS BEr.:;9LIIST
32;'2 LANCE BRU,'.-
3263 BRUCE Sr;
3204 90111.1)
3205 0013.:9 MULL
329 ,1P.19 0L;,7,I;
3261 SPENCER CIVI;--1,L!
11AL1 ACE Cr.;IX,;;
3209 LARRY MUG
32;0 1 ,11CHI',IIL
3211 .1101 HACKI;;C,
3212 FRIG HAFFNIR
3213 301111 HOBS, SI:.
3214 000: PPERS,
3215 GENE JAM'(:,:'!
3216 JC;r:;],;:
3217 DAVID 1:1,`Ir
3108 DI.LE
3919 STEYI: ,
32 -,'0 919v 1; 10111
13221 VOID CHECK
3222 !I. E. UK ,IRZ.
3113 RONERT LI ST iA
3211 L0'.!Fitt.
3225 JAME:I
3226 RAY Ml lilt
T(YEY 1 ,:OLt14!::
3/21IL 11221:11 NLMANN
3219 GARDA NMSLETTTN
32130 cinIs mimivgn
3221 DOUGLAS 3L 160
01 !11..0 MODOENL
Call igraphy instructions 32.00
November services 97.50
Refund overpayment of assessment 30.00
Equipment parts and service 89.00
November expenses 66.00
Fuel, oil and parts for equip. 1,255.59
Gym leader 60.00
Equipment rcpairs 523.26
December -;:penses 100.09
Equipment rental-Piarie View Imp.
project, Street dept.. and for
Birch island Rd. project 299.85
Trees-Peforestatien project 5,822.50
Novei,lir expenses 22.99
Fenoloyc,,s incerance 518.60
Bye leader 84.06
Sup;.n :es-Elections 27.00
Site evaluation services-Scenic Heic"hts
project 211.25
Repair parts and suppli(!s-Water dept. 496.63
Services
Refund-Swr service location expenses 178.58
Refund-swr service los:ajnn expenses 421.59
Fire services
Fire services
Fire serv;: es 290.06
rife services .59f?.CCI
Fire services
Fire services
Fire services 316.0j:
Fire services
Fire services
Fire services 1,030.cJ
Fire servicr
Fire services 840.00
Fir:, services 238.0
Fire service:, 550.01
Fire services 1,066.82
Fire services 430.00
Fire services 68.00
Fire services 172.0j
Fire serviccs 102.0:
Fire services 622.08
Fire services 358.08
Fire services 466.0
Fire S ervices 768.00
Fire services 552.8
Fire services
1,430.00
Fire services 58.6u
Fire services 328.00
Fire services
48.00
Fire services 942.00
Fire services 798.0e
Fire services 506.00
Decembr 10, 1976
327'2
3".35
3230
3?31
323f1
32>i
3241
3242
32!-13
324 1
32iHL
3247
STA;;LEY RIEGERT
NO1;RERT
111.1GFRE RUUD
CHARLIS SCHAIIBERGER
HARVEY
GE 3/D scuArliLL
EOCEIR:. SPANDF
Vri -.101; STEPP':
BC 2N SUTTON
LAYNE TRAA5ETH
ARVID VANGS n IESS
MIKE ROGERS
MIAR1 PAULSEN
ROBERT CHRISTENS'
VOID CHECK
rire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
TOTAL
services
services
services
services
services
S ervices
services
services
services
services
services
services
services
se r v ices
876.0(,
750.00
184.00
642.03
310.0!')
650.0
440.N
528.00
728.0?
270.0
288.0
462.02
606.0 ,'L
154.01
-------- --
679,671.71