Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/11/1976 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 11, 1976 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Sidney Pauly, Joan Meyers and Tim Pierce COUNCIL STAFF; City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Finance Director John Franc; Director of Community Services Marty jessen; Engineer Carl Jullie; Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS. II. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. Page 2314 APRIL 27�._1976.. III. PUBLIC A. 13^zenirn, rest to rezone approxirwately 9 acres from Page 2324 III I_5 Pa; . .'a i ublic to Office for the construction of a earkin�r lot. The site is located west of the Gelco Office Building within Area A of The Preserve Commercial Plan. IV. ORDINvNCIS & RESOLUTIONS A. 2nd Pe d!.pg of Ordinance No. 327, repealing Ordinance No. 29, grant;;; temoorary 3.2 beer license. B. ict ReadinaUf_ordinance No. 329_,_amending Ordinance No. 280, Page 2337 estahB;i ;nq utility Yates. C. 1st Petdinq of Ordinance No. 330, regulating consumption and Page 2341 display of intoxrcatinq liquor in certain premises, serving of set- ups, and imposing additional fees for state permit under MSA 340.1] . V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS__BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports by Council members. 1 • Council Agenda - 2 - Tuesday, May II, 1976 V. REPPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS (continued) B. port of Director of Community Services 1. C:aeh Park Fee Policy - Final Recommendation Page 2343 2. Communirci ion from Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Page 2344 1 Coip:ri,_,ion for definition of responsibility for Homeowners l,se iiiliona. 3. Edcr f'ooirie Historical and Cultural Center. Page 2345 4. Chemical Waste Disposal Site Page 2347 5. Boat regulations on Staring Lake Page 2349 C. Report of City Engineer • 1. Consider bids for street paving on Eden Court and School Road, 1.C. 51-286 (Resolution No. 1135). 2. Final plat approval for Maple Leaf Acres (Resolution No. 1136). Page 2350 i 3. Receive petition for utility and street improvements on Heritage Page 2354 I Road (Resolution No. 1137). 4. Pecc:ye feasibility report for street improvements on Preserve Page 2357 Boulevard from E-W Parkway to Schooner Boulevard (Resolution No. 1138). D. Report of City Manager 1. Renuest for authorization to appropriate up to $1,500.00 for consulting services for interceptor sewer system. E. Report ..t Finance Director 1. Clerk's License List Page 2359 2. Payment of Claim:; Nos. 1308 - 1431. Page 2360 VI. PETITION'S REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS 1. Communication from Laura Lee Geraghty, Director, Governor's Office Page 2363 of Volunteer Services (dated May 4, 1976). il VII. NEW BUSINESS VIII, ADJOU RNMENT, UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1976 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel Billy Bye Joan Meyers Tim Pierce Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Managei-Roger Ulstad City Attorney Harlan Perbix City Engineer Carl Jullie Director of Community Services Marty lessen Planning Director Dick Putnam Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION - Doug Dudgeon, Eden Prairie Community Church ROLL CALL: Ail members present. (Pauly was excused from the meeting at 9:30 PM) I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS. The following items were requested to be added to the Council agenda under the "New Business" category: A. Discussion on Ordinance revision. B. ReIocation Assistance Act. C. Inquiries - City Hall D. Scheduling of joint meeting with School Board, E. May 18 and May i9 - Hypertension Proclamation F. Vacancy on Human Rights Commission G. Funds for M.A.I. appraisal. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the agenda with the inclusion of the seven afore mentioned items. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES A. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 6, 1976. Council Minutes - 2 - Tuesday, April 27, 1976 A. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 6, 1976 (continued) Pg. 2, para. 4, line 3, after "Jullie" insert ", referring to the traffic lights in the intersection of Wallace Road and Highway #5,"; and in line 4 strtke "maybe" and insert "probably". pg. 4, para. 6, strtke last line and insert in lieu thereof "proposed by the consultant will provide the needed product". pg. 5, last para., 5th line, strike "assessments" and insert in lieu thereof "assessment recommendations". Pg. 7, para. 4th para. , 3rd line, strtke "purchasing". MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the City Council minutes of April 6, 1976 as published and corrected. Motion carried unanimously. B. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 13, 1976 Pg. 3, last para. , line 6, strtke "habitat" and insert in lieu thereof "intrusion"; and in the same para. , add a new sentence at the end of the para. to read as follows: "Water quality and habitat improvement programs must be started now." Pg. 4, 1st para., last line, strike "of"and insert "for". pg. 6, 2nd para., 4th line, strike "encourage" and insert "direct". MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the City Council minutes of April 13, 1976 as published and corrected. Motion carried unanimously. III. PUBLIC HEARING A. Mitchell Lake PUD, revised platting and rezoning for single family and multiple. The PUD is located east of Mitchell Lake and West of County Road 4. Bruce Thompson, President of Pemtom, outlined the proposal to the Council, noting their request is for 14 single family lots rather than 15 single family lots as previously proposed. Mr. Thompson stated that this is the same concept presented last December. Jeff Pederson, laden Prairie News, questioned: (1) The City was going to investigate the feasibility of acquiring the pennlsula, has this decision been made, and (2) is the Counetl considering the land coverage on the pennisula? Council Minutes - 3 - Tuesday, April 27, 1976 A. Mitchell Lake PUD, revised platting and rezoning for single family and multiple. (continued) Ulstad responded to the 1st part of Mr. Pederson's question stating that our City Assessor did establish a value on the pennisula of approximately $160,000.00 - the proponent estimated the pennisula's worth at approximately $350,000.00. Mr. Jessen stated that he had requested of the Watershed Board of Managers as to their interest in sharing with the cost of the pennisula. It was the Board's opinion that the pennisula would be one of a low priority. Based on the Watershed Board's opinion, the staff recommends to the Council and the Commissions that until the City can find additional sources of revenue, we would be hard pressed to purchase this pennisula. Meyers said she was not aware that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission had made a final recommendation on the Pemtom pennisula and is disappointed that this has not been done. Ulstad responded that she was correct that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission had not taken any formal action and that Mr. Jessen has reviewed this matter with the Commission and that the matter has been on the Commission's agenda for about 2 meetings. City Planner Putnam responded to the 2nd part of Mr. Pederson's question verifying the fact that the Council is considering the land coverage on the pennisula and that basically the coverage is hard surface, Le., buildings, driveways and streets, and would not be significantly different for the 14 single family lots vs. 30 - 35 townhouses,and is within the Minnesota Shoreline Management Association regulations. Putnam also spoke to the Planning Commission's recommendations made at their meeting held March 22, 1976. Putnam further stated that the pennisula would be nice for the City to have, but there are so many other things that people have expressed a need for that this might be difficult to achieve at the present time. General discussion took place regarding homeowners' associations. Jim Hill, Pemtom, stated that there would be two homeowners' associations associated with the pennisula - one for single family and the other for townhouses. Fenzel questioned if part of the homeowners' associations convenants would include available access to the public to the pennisula. Hill responded that it was Pemtom's thought that if you had the public access through and adjacent to the lake, that was adequate. Pen2el asked if the road names met with the City Engineer's approval. City Engineer Jullie responded that they did not and they would have to be changed at the time of final platting. Council Minutes - 4 - Tuesday, April 27, 1976 A. Mitchell Lake PUD, revised platting and rezoning for single family and multiple (continued) • MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Pierce, to close the Public Hearing and give a 1st reading to Ordinance No. 326, rezoning the Mitchell Lake PUD from Rural to R1-13.5 for the single family area and RM 6.5 for the townhouse area. Roll Call Vote: Bye, Pauly, Pierce and Penzel voted "aye", Meyers voted "nay". Motion carried. Meyers requested that the minutes reflect her opposition to the change of the land use from cluster townhouses to single family. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Pierce, to approve Resolution No. 1125 approving the preliminary plat. Roll Call Vote: Pauly, Pierce, Bye and Penzel voted "aye", Meyers voted "nay". Motion carried. IV. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 327,repealtng Ordinance No. 29, granting temporary 3.2 beer licenses. City Attorney Perbix spoke to Ordinance No. 327. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to give a 1st reading to Ordinance No. 327, repealing Ordinanca No. 29. Motion carried unanimously. B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 325, establishing salaries for Mayor and City Council. Councilwoman Pauly expressed her concern regarding the $200.00 salary for council members,noting that she has received comments from a number of ci7.tzens who felt that this figure was too high. Favors a lower salary. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to approve the 2nd reading of Ordinance No. 325, establishing salaries for Mayor and City Council. Roll Call Vote: Meyers, Pierce, Penzel and Bye voted "aye", Pauly voted "nay". Motion carried. C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 324, licensing building contractors doing business within the City of Eden Prairie and amending Ordinance No. 311. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to approve the 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 324. Motion carried unanimously. V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, tvARDS & COMMISSIONS • A. Reports of Council Members Council Minutes - 5 - Tuesday, April 27, 1976 A. Reports of Council Members (continued) 1. City Planner Putnam reported on the Planning Commission meeting held April 26 as Councilwoman Pauly had been excused from the Council meeting. 2. Councilman Pierce reported on the following: Cedar Hills Golf Course proposal .South Hennepin Human Services Council - decentralization program the County is undertaking 3. Mayor Penzel spoke to Resolution No. 1134, relating to Hennepin County Detoxification Center. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to consider taking action on Resolution No. 1134. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to adopt Resolution No. 1134, relating to Hennepin County Detoxification Center. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Councilwoman Meyers commented on calls she has received from League of Women Voters pertaining to help they had received from City Hall when making their report entitled "State of our Cities". Special thanks to City Assessor Martz and Finance Director Frane. B. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Bryant Lake Park Season Director of Community Services lessen spoke to Ms memo dated April 23, 1976, and answered questions of Council members. Dick Anderson, member of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, spoke in favor of having Bryant Lake Park open for a longer period of time, and personally feels the park should be open all year long during daylight hours. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, that the Bryant Lake Park be opened on the same basis as we do in the summer time and that the closing date be set at another time. Further to appropriate $1,000.00 to accomplish this early opening. Motion carried unanimously. Council Minutes - 6 - Tuesday, April 27, 1976 1. Bryant Lake Park Season (continued) Meyers requested staff keep a close count on the exact number of dollars and usage generated by the early opening of Bryant Lake Park. Pierce requested staff have some type of publicity put in the newspaper noting that the Bryant Lake Park will be opened early. Also that possibly this information should be included in the "Happenings" newsletter. 2. 1976 Summer Playground Program Director of Community Services Jessen spoke to his memo dated April 23, 1976 and answered questions of Council members. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Fenzel, to support the 1976 Summer Playground Program with the exception that a fee of $2.50 be charged for Summer Fun and a fee of $2.50 for the Tiny Tot program, with a maximum amount of$5.00 per family. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Approval of bids for 1 Ton Stake Body Truck City Manager Ulstad explained that seven invitations were sent out and only one quote was received. He further recommended that the Council award the bid to Suburban Chevrolet Company in the amount of $5,780.27. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Pierce, to award the bid for a one ton stake truck to Suburban Chevrolet Company in the amount of$5,780.27. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Tax forfeited property at Westgate Director of Community Services Jessen explained that he is in the process of contacting people in the Westgate area regarding this tax forfeited piece of property. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to continue this matter to the May 4th Council meeting, direct the City Manager to request an extension from Hennepin County, and further requested that Jessen host a neighborhood meeting of people from the Westgate area before May 4, 1976. Motion carried unanimously. Meyers suggested that Jim Flavin be invited to attend the neighborhood meeting to relate his experiences with Sterling Field. y Council Minutes - 7 - Tuesday, April 27, 1976 C. Report of Planning Director • 1. Hennepin County Transportation Study Herb Klossner and Craig Spencer were present from the Hennepin County Highway Department to answer questions of the Council members. Mr. Spencer explained that there were two major reasons for the study: (1) Major reason for the study is an undate and (2) it is a requirement through the State and Federal regulations that Hennepin County has such a guide plan. The study does not propose any improvements of any kind, it is just a system study. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 1133, a resolution outlining the City of Eden Prairie's concerns and suggestions on the Hennepin County Transportation System Study draft report, and also attach to the resolution a copy of letter to Craig Spencer from City Planner Putnam dated March 12, 1976. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Anderson Lakes Condominiums, consideration of rezoning the property back to Rural as the conditions of the rezoning agreement have not been met. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Pierce, to set a public hearing date of June 1, 1976 for rezoning the Anderson Lakes Condominiums back to Rural. Motion carried unanimously. D. Report of City Engineer 1. Receive feasibility report for street improvements on Staring Lane and Ridge Road, I.C. 51-287. City Engineer Jullie outlined the feasibility report dated April 27, 1976. Doug Olsen, 9030 West Staring Lane, expressed several concerns he had regarding this project, i.e., assessments, longevity of the project, etc. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 1126 receiving report, Project 1.C. 51-287. Motion carried unanimously. Council Minutes - 8 - Tuesday, April 27, 1976 2. Receive feasibility report for utility and street improvements • for the Mitchell Lake Project by Pemtom, Inc., I.C. 51-289. Dave Husby, RCM Associates, outlined the feasibility report on this project dated April 27, 1976,and answered questions of Council members. Meyers stated she would like to have comments from the Watershed District on the storm sewer project. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Bye, to approve Resolution No. 1127, receiving report and ordering improvements and preparation of plans and specs for Phase I, 1.C. 51-289. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Meyers, to continue the meeting past 11:00 PM. Motion carried unanimously. E. Report of City Manager 1. Request from Gelco Corporation to set a Public Hearing for May11, 1976. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Pierce, to set a Public Hearing for May 11, 1976 for Gelco's Parking Lot rezoning to Office. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Discussion of Suburban Public Health Nursing Services City Manager Ulstad discussed this item with Council members and requested the Council authorize him to negotiate a preliminary joint powers agreement with the cities of Edina and Richfield, and possibly purchasing additional services from the City of Bloomington. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Bye, to authorize the City Manager to negotiate a draft joint powers agreement for Suburban Public Health Nursing Services with the cities of Richfield and Edina, and possibly purchasing additional services from the City of Bloomington. Motion carried unanimously. F. Report of Finance Director 1. Payment of Claims Nos. 1188 - 1307. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 1188 - 1307. Roll Call Vote: Meyers, Pierce, Bye and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. '1 of Council Minutes - 9 - Tuesday, April 'L7, IU/b VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion on Ordinance revision. Mayor Penzel, at the request of Councilwoman Pauly, asked the Council if they would be interested in having a committee study the City of Eden Prairie's ordinances to see if any of the City's existing ordinances are obsolete or not being enforced. Roger Pauly would be willing to serve on this committee. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to instruct the City Attorney to contact Mr. Pauly to further discuss this matter. Motion carried unanimously. B. Relocation Assistance Act. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pierce, to direct the staff to draft a letter for the Mayor's signature to our state legislators calling to their attention the apparent needless provision in the relocation act that requires a willing seller to be paid relocation assistance. Motion carried unanimously. C. Inquiries - City Hall Councilman Pierce requested that the City staff do everything possible to assist people when they have an inquiry pertaining to the City of Eden Prairie. D. Scheduling of joint meeting with School Board MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to set a joint meeting with the School Board for May 18, 1976, 7:30 PM, at the High School. Subject to be roads and bonded indebtedness. Motion carried unanimously. E. May 18 and May 19 - Hypertension Proclamation Mayor Penzel proclaimed May 18 and May 19, 1976 as Hypertension Days on behalf of the Kidney Foundation of the Upper Midwest, Inc. F. Vacancy on Human Rights Commission Mayor Penzel announced the resignation of Daphne Krause from the Human Rights Commission and requested names be submitted to him fors successor to this position. a6.2 .,uuueu !VI UiuCes - to - ruesaay, Apra zi, ty/o G. Funds for M.A.I. Appraisal . City Manager Ulstad requested that the Council authorize an expenditure of $1,000.00 out of the contingency fund in the budget to be used, if necessary, for an M.A.I. appraisal on the Condon/Naegele property. MOTION: Pierce moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve an expenditure of$1,000.00 out of the contingency fund to be used for an M.A.I. appraisal on the Condon/Naegele property. Roll Call Vote: Pierce, Meyers, Bye and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. VII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to adjourn the meeting at 11:415 PM. Motion carried unanimously. • .9932 Unapproved i l:ninin;, ( ,.lea ',h., tes -3- April 20, 1976 V. P1iT1T10NS ,V;D REQUESTS. A. Gelco Ryzonin _ request to rezone approximately 9 acres from I-5 Park and Public to Of9'ice for the construction of a parking lot. The site is located , west of the Gelco Office Building within Area A of the Preserve CommercialP]an. The planner informed the commission the survey Gelco is presenting tonight shows a change in the southerh boundary from the plan the staff reviewed in the staff report. Mr. Greenberg, Gelco, stated their request is for rezoning,to Office for the immediate use of a parking lot and future use of anoffice building. The planner stated the staff is recommending approval of the request and suggests the change be part of the Gelco PUD. The staff further.recommends the future building plans be submitted to the City for Planning Commission and Council review prior to the issuances of a building permit. Sorensen asked if Gelco had tried car pools, vans , etc., to relieve their parking prob'.em. Mr. Greenberg replied they have tried car pools, and subsidized vans , but at this time they do not have enough employees to make such systems feasible. The planner informed the commission, the council in approving the Gelco Office rezoning stipulated that future parking be accommodated by ramps over the existing parking or by additional land acquisition. Mr. Norm flours, representing !drs. Durheim ( owner of 1 of the 2 sinv lc family homes adjacent to the site ), asked if the rezoning would affect the taxes of the single family properties. The planner responded the single family properties are presetnly zoned Rural and assessed as resi- dential non-homestead, and the rezoning should not affect their property values at this time. • Mr. Rogers then suggested Gelco install a harrier on the south and west sides of the two single family properties to prevent snow from being pushed onto their property and to discourage trespassers. Mr. Connolly, owner of the other single family lot, spoke in favor of the barrier and questioned what liability he would have if a trespasser were injured on his property. Mr. Greenberg felt they could erect a barrier on the south and west sides of the 2 single family properties. Sorensen asked if the proponents were familiar with the proposed DNR Rules and Regulations which may affect their future building site coverage. Mr. Greenberg's counsel stated they would investigate the item. Motion: cheemoved, Bearman seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning request from ;-5 Park and Public to.Office for the construction of a parking area as per: the document submitted by Parker Klein Associates, the certificate of survey, and the staff report dated 4-22-76 amended on page 4 as follows- 4. The Planning Commission recommends Gelco provide adequate screening to the existing residential properties to minimize casual trespassing with review and approval of the screen by the staff. • STAFF REPORT APPLICANT: Gelco Corporation SITE: 9 f acres immediately East of Corporate Headquarters REQUEST: Rezoning from I-5 and Public to Office and Public .District TO: Planning Commission • FROM: Dick Putnam • DATE: April 22, 1976 BACKGROUND The following graphics included in the appendix ( A ) and explanation summarize the historical zoning and planning that has effected the north shore of Anderson Lakes and specifically the-9 acre Gelco site. 1. Pre 1968 3 The Zoning Ordinance adopted March , 1958, ( Ordinance fl 8 ), zoned the area !; S-1 Special Industrial District and a 250 foot Public park strip along the shore of Anderson Lakes. Exhibit A is a copy of the Ordinance 8 zoning map I• revision 2-7-67. 2. 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan The Guide Planning process in 1967-68 culminated with the adoption of the I• 1968 Guide Plan which illustrated the use of Anderson Lakes as a major regional or community park and preservation of the north shore of Anderson Lakes con- sistent with previous Zoning Ordinance 8 8. The use for industrial develop- ment was also continued in the Comprehensive Plan. Exhibit 8 illustrates the +, 1968 Plan map. 3. 1970 Ordinance k 335 Zoning. The adoption of Zoning Ordinance k 135 zoned the area along I -494 north of Anderson lakes to I-5 as contained in the Zoning Text 13-3 . The zoning of a 250 foot Public strip consistent with the Guide Plan and Ordinance48 was also included for park and open space purposes. The provisions of the I-5 Park District permitted large scale industrial/office land uses benefitting from the freeway exposure and proximity to Anderson Lakes. Exhibit C is a '. copy of the City's current Zoning Map. • 4. 1970 PUD 70-03 Preserve Planned Unit Development The Preserve PUD modified the Guide Plan slightly by reducing the 250 foot strip along Anderson Lakes and by proposing commerical land uses north of the park shore of Anderson Lakes rather than industrial. Graphic D illustrates an early laud use plan from The Preserve PUD. • • Staff Report-Gelco Parking Lot -2- April 22, 1976 • 5. 1971-72 Anderson lakes Regional Park. • Development with the Hennepin County Park Reserve , Metropolitan Council,, • City of Bloomington& the City of Eden Prairie managed to acquire LAWCON Funds for acquisition of a major regional lurk surrounding the entire Anderson Lakes/ Tierney's Woods area. The park acquisition proposed a shoreline preservation and buffer zone around the entire lake with total acquisition of the land north of Amsden Road to Anderson Lakes and the Rhino head area. Acquisition of the north shore of Anderson Lakes to West 78th Street was considered and discarded due to high land value, freeway proximity , access and limitation on funding. • 6. 1973 Blacklock / Weaver Naturalist Study Defining Park Boundary. Naturalist Les Blacklock and Wildlife Management Specialist David Weaver conducted a study of the shoreline of Anderson Lakes in conjuction with The Preserve and the City of Eden Prairie to determine a logical and . consistent shoreline management plan.Respecting private property rights and previous commitments made by the Preserve were considered in an effort to finally define where the park boundary along the North and West shore of Anderson Lakes would be. The study was thoroughly discussed with all concerned property owners. Graphic E illustrates the park line boundary as defined in the Blacklock/ Weaver Study for the area A site in The Preserve. 7. 1974 Preserve Commercial Plan. The Preserve submitted a plan prepared by Development Concepts Corporation that illustrated some modification with all previous plans but did take into account the major land uses of commercial or office and the importance of the park / lakeshore boundary. The plan has never been approved by the City of Eden Prairie due to withdrawal of the plan by The Preserve in order to consider alternatives for development of the commercial sites. Two exhibits F and G illustrate the evolution of the plan. F was the first plan submitted that was modified through discussions with the Parks, Recreation aniNatural Resources Cnmmission and Planning Commission which produced Plan G, that was acceptable to the Planning Commission concerning land uses, visual impact upon Anderson Lakes and park open space definition. • 7. April 1976 Preserve Resubmission of Area A ,platting and land use 6 Gcico Application for Rezoning. Summary Review • of previous City and private actions for the north shore of Anderson • lakes indicates two major concepts. First, that the land uses have since 1958 been considered of a nonresidential type • with evolution from industrial to commercial and office uses. Secondly, that the park boundary has varied from a rather arbitrary 250 foot standard to a carefully considered line drawn with land developer input and wildlife management/naturalist. ( exhibit E ) " Staff Report-Gelco Parking Lot Rezoning -5- April 22, 1976 +�+ Ij An excellent example of how the site maybe developed is the Gelco Corporate Office that exists today,with sensitive treatment of the lakeshore and open meadow area , as well as the high quality architectural design and site planning for the building. Such standards are a credit to the Gelco Corporation, public interest and the City's visual image. GELCO PLAN - April 1976 • The proposed land use plan for the Gelco expansion is in direct response to corporate growth in excess of that anticipated at the'time of Gelco rezoning and construction. You may recall that initial staff and Planning Commission recommendations were that future parking be included in a ramping structure over the existing parking , or through acquisition of additional property. The alternative chosen by Gelco was acquisition of additional property from The Preserve, thereby providing the fastest possible provision of.an additional 200 parking spaces. • The property acquisition also allows for future building expansion as proposed in the original PUP on the existing site or potentially the new parcel purchased. At this time sufficient studies have not been completed by Gelco to determine when, where and how future building expansion would be accomplished. The April 19th plan does reflect the Gelco commitment (' to develop specific portions of the existing and new site and the commitment to preservation of the penninsula east and south of the existing building. The staff's review of the April 19th plan agrees that a logical park development boundary provides consistency with the existing Gelco open space and the arbitrary sewer easement line through the parcel. The • line also will protect the south knoll which is a primary visual focus of the existing Celco building. Also, by retention of the knoll future parking and/or building will be adquately buffered from Anderson Lakes. The staff supports the boundary as defined on the April 19th plan. Access to the site is consistent with the modified Preserve Land Use Plan and allows a high capacity entrance to West 78th Street . The Preserve and Gelco should consider a joint agreement for use of the driveway access . Cost sharing and other neigotiable terms. may be considered by the owners. Screening , landscaping and grading of the parking and/or building areas should provide buffering from Anderson Lakes Park and I - 494 . The same concept utilized in parking for the existing Gelco Building would be appropriate for development of the new site. • Staff Report-Gelco Parking Lot Rezoning -4- April 22, 1976 • RECOMMMENDATIONS 1. The Planning / Park & Recreation staff recommends to the Planning Commission that the 9 t acre Gelco PUD 73 - 10 be revised to include the parking , building and open space uses consistent with the Blacklock Studyf,indicated on the 4-26-76 revised plan. And that such plan is consistent with Anderson Lakes Regional Park develnnmAnt • and the Major Center PUD. 2. The staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council rezoning the ;9 acres from I-5Pk and Public to Major Center Area Office District for the use of regional office and supportive parking as illustrated on exhibit H , April 19, 1976 plan. 3. The staff would recommend the review and approval of the building and site development plans prior to final approval of any building or additional parking expansion other than that shown on the April 26, 1976 plan. The intent would be that the Planning Commission and City Council would approve the building expansion and/or site development plans prior to issuance of building permits. No public hearing would be anticipated . DP:jj • • i • •-- - i r Vift" ' 06.',-;,-,•,;',:`"•413::.:,1-.to..% • :,''P-4 .<•,•;,:'-5;:irl•';:',:'-:: . 1 1 . -c,'{':;,''‘:;..i:, '''‘ii''ili.:7,:-C,,',::;.::,---. 1 ';', .',‘,.`•:;, ' .'f''f...:.43; '':::;',',S": „..4;•:.‘:',.".",•.32,47:::',7.77 (7.:77-0-7,7r,:grfli //4 'r:-"Y•C'C:' t'-'2iC.:'7'.';',...---: ,:.:',';'.''::',: :.C`::-,::'ili„,,.:„::-..: ::::Y;':;;;*.-.„.,',`?:;•,'5,,,:::: , /,/,, ,,,,,4,.., :::'. ,:r:.;,)", '7.... ......:.;,>:;,">'::,•....,5•1•::::'1•:,!14-r......11,,,.:::::.ri (7/7/ ''' : , 7 ///';'''''//////' 7/7/ // • . ' - ,)-‘k' 1 N'.... . :..• ',:',/,///,7 , /2//// / // . ., ,,,,,f,,,.,_,,),`', .. ,,:_. ., . )00\, . ':1 ''''''442/2..7,,. ...„'//,' // J . i - - . 77-''--f:•1":"7- - .----*.- ..e.:•;','t' . ,..'' '- ------ N:..,it:14,:•, - ' . --.---„,..r.,- ,-,--,---:, K,2.c ..,.;.,,.,,.,,..,-, ;.!•:,;.-..i __,J . ...:,;,_, ., y 17 :- 7 77i. 7 '777 '::';',1 .-.-- .1..):,1,%,;,6:.-7''s'..,'i' ;•r///7/ ,/// / / .. .',.:,):. `.','",'_-,..--...r- • //// /i/ i .,,/, ,ri,1;e"''/..'v ' '/ ,'''','!:‘;,.j.;,;;..',•',,!......Z17';',.+(s::i.:1,,I.,•/ c••••';',.•;;', t.,,,7::: •;!,-,., ,.:':::;..,'C' '','1:'.,•:,`;'!:::..1 ' ,,%... '.,'"--\N. . / '2...',, ' .:.;7:7'< <,:,i* .. ,.,1 'C.'?.;'-,..,'.;•3'.,.jsr ,, ',1.-''ii (?,.;:•.,„,,..4,..' '.) , ' . :.k.. .•'• -: .. ...1-----t, .,•:c.r...4.) .:.:',..ft; •:.--' -, i • ,'..•:;..!. ., •. ::,.:.:;;: - --1---- . '''' "...\. s"... .::1:.•.03:,..: ,:,..., . .---)li'':. :V7 •1 <!\ .•%,.) \.• .] \ V A:111/,P.'C,,,•9 0:/d. ' . • •,'•.• t , . , ,. i:i:,.:: :,,..,:•:.::::,,. .., -//,','..-*'\, • :: : 1 ,' \ '.''', ' .. . ..• : • ' - ...— .,::' ,:,:i ,:''.i::.•:.1.1: . • ,": i'..,,;• '. .,,' / [a . .----- 1).,,,,,,( i„,,,2 \ 11!, A‘ ':',. ..`-..._._......._ ,-------:--N,,--..ii -:--,--I.-—, ' ''' - - • -14 '14 .\ , )! \ .k; );-,-----N) s---'\----.---' ,- -----...----,,,...-_,..._ .......3 , ,. .•,,. ---,---:.-.-.. ...--,,--,--_ __---- --- (-)7 !, \ -_--j.._„„) J_---:;-:-,..-."----i.i,7.;------y.-...,.,..,7--.--.;.-...:,(E'1i1Ii,'!.-,\.,.,.„..,.•.P..,.,..,,..•.,I--,.-..::7.1''.i;\':.*- 1 • .-„,.—...M..„.I I-_-._—i i_--•.-•- : - ---"--_-----Y-_-''-7-,'-.1-T'7 i---:)t,--.-.N`r-..%A-,-o1.-z'.'.-...--:-.!.,,-7',n.1,)1-..1;....--.,;\'.V,:*),\'„'1;.*'-.,,1'..•_/-,/1 17,/_);.-i..-..s_-- • .N,v. _ K , R I _ ' / Ir/ . -.1, • ,',A,s j{,'..‘,,"Y.",,Ii,_,.:4-A.•...•:.•.—..•,_„.f:•.•.:','',!,-,•'.- .' II? .:•.'1i • 1.iC ii- ' ' "," ‘ .. .. ); L -,. ),,_..1/ i .., r,- -i--•,,,-,•,..,,:_\. 1 • A••••• ::::,:.:41 I f --- 2 PlIt.,1,.\ • ------- -.....".•,...fe _,.. ---.,.. ...,,,t_ . •1 —71,.,,. al's' ,,,..r..7- -1 '.• 25PRK 5 - .. .... S-. 1j, . 0,.--1„•;;'1 "....-`- 1 N I _.... j ..• U i•-••••-•-V -,,, 1.1-„:,-, L__------ \ uv-t.-- --, -- . •N, i t, . . (1 .r i- IC^REG)i 0, j.,n)70 3 .) ' • • / ,•7S,, .....1 . PD /( ' ,_ 31 Z r• , vt, 72 2 • ' --7"-.7 ' --"'" :' II- i L.. 73-01 I 1 ' $ 2 ,........--1 1 ; ; ,....1 , .. PUD 70-3,.......7_1(Aru0 L -- .-- 1 .,.... i.,„,, 4 1 , . , th,,,,., _1• • -•••_(.; h 0 • a -..c., e, •„,,. i ........._, A. 0 . • _.: ,• • ...„ % •,r, ,,, - , ,- ,•••__, • .':\NI,‘.'ft,_ ,- ';•-•\`'.':I ' (Y.-I&\\-• ' ', s..t`f 4, .-, •••••;...., -..•c..,.. .. 01--..;; ' • ? ).•.;..!--,•1 -, -r-'—..... '' --- ' • 8.-' •s ") i/5 0 -i' il V,.'''' -• 7,---,,,...._.; , '---,,,,,',,,.._7 1: •." : , ...1 1-Nty I. — --- — - — ( I, I 'i /,--,-rs-3---;',' :-:, \c. s' !) ! f'•..- 1::,/' -.3."'• 'k,'• ‘...v. 1(\_i' `,... ):::''-:"(") N , , ,c,-.' r,;,,- i.:',...vi Ivt,--- '_, -_-.-,,_) - • ' ) A-- 6-0Y )Pi : ).) ' c- : -).> -37 —f- -- ;:--;.'''.'--. - `q---•'-_•,,,--1 `r----'..,;..,' '''''4:"---\-•i.ct.::.:\ '''' •--/-:.:":241\\11.. 1 ,\..,•• , A • ))1 -1,'-'1--5".. Q) '•'-t.': k '-- -• \ •, **,...,. ./ il I iSs.,,..., -4 ) ,.,_•, \ /...::,<,,,,,j,.\,,. i ,,.../, ---T j ___iy,r,/,,/1 if,- .„..,;:_.._,,,_ . 11-71° ‘ ..',-------.2 • .,... .(--,.,_,....-----0--",•'1-" ,,3,, '1.1CA _;----.. ) („ „I 7....- _ f 0 lf, ----t--,,,. ,,, ..... ;_,,,- _,,, r cf , ).11 ,cv ',-- --- 7 1---fc ,,, _._-. 4: y' •OfF'l.. ,:: II{ '-' / 71 ),(\._r - , , ,, ,c,_ ,,..., , ,. _ 1.-...\i, -- 1 I , [ ,-. q. 1• I ./L''' > 7 1 \( ..--"N 1 •,}, , •"•,, ( . v.-ix%,, Ci',\\v,/,,,,'' 0 ( ....„......_zd 1 0 , I ,_ 1 ! / 1 (2', e3,1 / \ --„.-;_. ;;.: ,--) ,':•, , c , fi I ! 11./6111\ {)\ 1 k.,, 1,sni.,- (.k.'"-•.:-- .f)(\ '''' - s ,, 1! i \-,,d!,.,_ /(AN ,(5,',).t1 ''.- -'4' 'N't k-tY1-.}-.2-.'•"..4'2A -t. 4 I Elsie .,.. � .. e\e ,.�ram" — y Y•-. I tic , \\ ..r"•.,.ti a ,;\` i�, . 4 1 k %J j\ 1 , 1�•ZQG4,-,54 At i• ' f ' y� 1 . h'..ti J .\ \ \ / ♦ i\Ill .4 / ..♦ Pa � \�_ t �' r ..t -;�f\'W ,-r �( i'l 1. a A 1� Gr 6CJ '"1�`i '-_-�,.� a, •f n �. 'r wr'\\ -/,/• 1�L 1 J,�91 1'Y-F j.'I T 7': i _'�' /4 ris ••4 j FV Ar \\ ..5 a 6,4 " _ �•,..,11,.h��1 11 { /7// //' .'r, 1 .i ---, ,--=,----------z-- \.e \ " f/ w .i, i, ..., t), Sri hi' I3 \�, it Anderson i EL " Esc 4 r 'ill /I�\ f";' l 'ta ' �T��\1� \;, . c.f^-r,raCr�w�I..4. M`.1:'r e; ,-E- .N\:•/�ii:' _ ,I..„,,,,,, ..,r`.i r.t ;,1 i?,\\ •.\,N,T "�C.^t7e::.c.:.T......: '.`'""1 r 1 , . . I . ... ... , .. I 11 .I i • N ? o k 1 ' 7...: ..,_1__-:- 7/ . /7 / ,; ) . \‘ _ _____ .. rn, 11. , W..' ( , / / : / \ \ -,. .. --- r" ____ 0 ...." ,_ -- _ ' ,/ ,i.:;,..,,,,,,,_..... -- ,. ,- -,-_-,-..----_......., . t:',,..•.55:.•A- 7._ ------ --, ..\,..._.. ,. , !...,....-,,.,-^i...-L.,e '6, , , P _ \i • . ,-,..,,,,,,, .,‘......,:,,,,-, -.,,„....,4.,,,:,,,:y,:....,),, . .. .).--,.. ()", i‘,--tp c -, 4v7.o--,-,, .,,c, .,,,,,.........,,,,,,, .; ,,/ , /k•, .,• ‘..A'-f..-, 7 ,-:•/,:,.,..„:,,. .-:7:::,--,2,'',,.'v3,-41 (:)Y . ' ! / ///i7i1 " -'.", ..;,... • '''.4:(.4- —ri......? 0 Zi i 1 `c..1 `..;,.--, '•f.t. 'si.N., ',,,,, * . ---,.. ., ' „„y-'1;4 I, 0 i \ ,, ,: if::'-, -\?:-: i'''''t ;\:""' '''-`,..,. a( ..\‘'‘,,'••\;.,:l..,:1;.....'.•.,;,.?? /6_1:3A I ! i •,\'}' -Oce ,'A., , .t..., °,`. ... ,... ',,,.- •,.• - .•. , ' /%/7 ,i)-',,!,,, ,...':!,.. il,'',',3fei.,:,;„ V,,i.:.:(..›. \.,.,:..,..!:‘,.',-,\"V''...`•":: •,. ',,...t,,),,:.,‘/,:it,..,...7_,',,,,-,,,7,..!4::.t.:;t-:•?:;...1.4:t/i,;:. ' ,',„,t,:'vx.. \'''' ',,,,\,/".:<:H ,:.; ,,,c,. „.• .. . „(1. 1,>'` -T,'..: ..;- ' J. ,jr:• ^‘,....•.-:-....7.,-'7.--.",..-12 c7-"•-•, ..:•-..?...,-- _<?.,'qt• ;,'1) , ...,;. ,..\-; • •- .-,-.••• ,,') v. .,-,- -- ,•-•". ,', .',..,.: , i,...i. •,',.•4 •\ '• '.i -',-- •:`;-'1 1' y . k, ..,.. ..,,,,,, "-,, -',,••i': ..':Af+.1....-.;) -,:- ,f 1---,..• .1‘,"4,, ••• • r,., ...,6 .,.,•:--" t•,',X,'.-:.•1'1I:L •1'e,1--.'.1..,','....'..,S' '7'•u''‘`v,.•d.•,\,1,1 I1,I :'.1:,.:;;%``,.."..„e':,:..?)(4„:4;:',':,,.--i,.;'.,‘'.:':...:,'4'"I I II,Z;.--I, : .%! /,k )'/ , :. fi . ( "I ,i ///i/i/ ;, 1?. ‘ , .,,3 •: • .^,.2,•_.1 .- • ' o - , r,v ' \, (•. • 0Sg. Ia l 1; 1,, ,, : , ' / 11 2 ''''' r/i/14'''•••/1/2;( ',-; ;;7211 1- ll'‘v.:'‘....;',,r;- il ',-.t, 'I"' `,,,,' '" • *: 1.', • -.., ',.: f -: : i 41 ,,1 (,•', vi k\•s\ .( ' \ • ..- -n f -, i / <-\ ' ' - ' - -- \ . . r• r 1 ..- 01.,:',:. /7 iip• ,,,,,(-=',p ro71 !! 4( ,.'k- 13 Li "I';'.. I' ///7,iv'?.'/,../..,- •,'„,,d 4, • ri /5., .. • -.,. L . 1 K ! 11 n : -;2,,•;...,-- _--- -:' .1", ''.•".; ps\ 4, -,,S'„\‘k`,,,,,•i,A (I . _(•:. .."!::•'... 0''. ''•'i r'-',... "7/7), (44 1 ri ''''_i - -tr.'t?..... ,....... . _ ..--' - ) -.:.,-., ',".771 i • "^ ^:` I (_,-;,. - r t e'l ' ' ' 0 (- ,., Cit", .1 ,,,,, r .k.,-- •- t=,i,',i;:.:' , -. ___,:,.'tt •\.-j::i•‘ ..1' 4 . • i., ... ,. I ... ..... I.I. . 0 i „:,.,,i "::,,',,..7--•,-.4,a ........:,:i f---,,, ..::,.:ji. O 0 .• \'.\'' C :.C's'A,•;‘, C 4 !1,-,,V.t..-...„..: ,I. ' o 0 r ,,, . „ c, \.) ;, ..•:k1 7. " ...: Z.'s -,'S'1\'\'''tt t • 1 1.,. '''''''••" . ct cc o . 0 k ,•,(...,'1,,,.,•,.;.,z,,,:-':14'( ' '‘r- '-,:r,;:::'1,"' Z.' : 1 • .." ,' :- t'd ..'. 1., 1•i .,•-•.., -^,,,,....',-,1 r: -,•,,,,. .,,-,;‘,.,,,,• ' 1 ;',,,'.., ,,,,i A.N.:,••-ti(:. p.( ., ,.., ' • 0 f- .1 ' ‘c",\,, \''N L''',_;,', 0 \ " ' '''. .‘ 't ),\ ':•• •;•.(" "*: ,‘'.-/••••••••-•1 ::..•:,.,.\,.....)1.,;,,...,• gq.32, t-, ,,„,i ;.-.•,,,,, ...,,,,,:.\....,1 ;••, ,, •..,..,\?, . , , ,... ;,.,....ivt ,„.\\\,,.,\,,t,j ,.> • ..... - - • • . 1:ev--1...y.' i i ; .,3.Jam..+.—'__. ��, � ��/,./ 1 %.. /.7'if' i.,.."•I.s,),'f\i j. 7'` t r,:,i c,)t.e' .",.3 t / L , t ;f /i r`. 1 , 3', .2": .1 i I 1 t• • ..s"5 i A N.' •.• 1,A.j..1 ,. , • , . -1;"41:' •1 +2 ; f, / �ir''� �j �'� + \ -dam! ,� . f I r.,,.„04 . C./31,., ' rt-.1 i 1 , ....\ :.--' c, \\N ! �/� \ riri`+11 RI St i Cks......... i . //,., .- -r '''N.:____j 2 0\ „ :' ;, . iitti c. : I i rf)il, r., L. - , '; i.,,,,,,2,7:,,,.',././..,....::.:2.,,... -' .; / `..t../1 Lr_.-777-7;..,4 7:9,, ..,,, ., 2 -......, ___-----<,.....z____-_-.... __,,,cf,,,,,,.:.,/,,, , .:,-..-77.._,_.,„, _, ..,,,,,.., .!,. 1„,../...;,/ —______•,_::_-_,..-./.,„ ../ • . . c.1...,_,:r.,..._:, :.....: ../., , , i ._..,____...-..-.--..,,--,...,..........e"......_ ..., ...• ,• e '+.�,,�� , '„'-tr cz....Lx3tts..t:TN....,el1 (i" �, 1....1 i ' \ ',/- 1 1 . ,/ 7 i ), I. . 1 4 _ 1 , ! A 6 ',. A . . /j • M i 26 t ; 4. r . , ... . . i ,• . , I , ! i 1 .'• -„.. 1 ; . 1 '•!, ' ' . t ; I •: •I \ '... . q• ,,, . •• i ., .7. 'c''•. '1 I • i •••-•—•• .. -, ' •ii: . . ..\\.. • F '—1 0 i. • I-, , I . . • • - :!. ! , •... • e. .t:'':;!. '•''.,.% • ‘!,! • I ! r . ......"-,. .4* / -s" (..... '., '.11' \\. .'•1 ... 1 , ' i 1 •r-1" .\\‘'1:••.• '-. e• -:. 14 N.-, '4, % . 1 • -' ,.•.1 •/-,'••• .t , t • : i 1 4 : . • ; '''{ , .'S.: --•... r'. / '• •t I / c'-'.,,-..,.• •••••-•AO' ,,,•-•• . ' ;;) :! ." II' ,1` . ! i it 1 il ;., . • t• ./ •• • 1 1 I •, . ••• j •• 4 / • i i • i . %,, . .,.• '-",.. .:,, ‘'•:,...„. 7 • ,:t. •'.., I ft •i• ..'X. • t i . cf;;I 4'<.••••• , V•,- ••••• I.r.' ‘Z•• , . • j o 1.• .• . •. (....., • • . • ;0. ••? ‘4. • i ! 1 ;, :IA:,,i•-.1\ .„, -,-.,,, ,,,...,-....,....„'....., it' ,I % r . ,. : 1 •i I r a . ; --.. *.s, ..., _._. ..-, ...;#4. \ (;.(7..,:,:il i:::':'.../. ' i ' 1 • 1 :.(1 .- ..---, ,. C 4.( ..ri7i$1 i // •*.'1. r i 1 , f... `•..... 4.‘ .•••••W. :7 :me .... ,.I/ h ...''.."1. t. ... : ' •.• • ,•.. -,\-•...c j 5 / )/ / .1' -_ e 1 i TI I I In i-_-1 1 ii;': • ' .f ;) A/ \s*.X' • . . I r'•10 :t (-'' ^ • 'I 1..9c./ i'. // 1 il , , .. .,• .1,7,•: - ;., ., . i, . f1:1.'..e- 4 •.. ._. .. ,; / 1 1 iy. . . f•I, or ..../ • .i.;.''''r •`. .., v./ for,'•••2•-; ..,4,*\ ,',/:•`., • e•\ •-,:e 1,lc) ,,. • ; ,,,,,/, ..., .,.„ /,,r1. 1 .., .1 - . . • \\A • • • ... I.,:.,..,,.//47,.... ,..,;,./,, .i ,44 \ 'IS ' ,• / V. ...".:.•'//' , ..;'< ''' • I I'•k ' I . ' l'•*.•:,". ' .• •: •'.',...;X/// .Vv-• •1 6-141 -) r.-:-.',-- . ,;-:,'" :----, .,..1 1, 0. ----- •. v.„ " . i,.,-..' , - . • . ...,.'l',/ /// f• ;.,e..`, :,, \‘ \' .e,, -. ,.... .:.... -.,.,„-,,, 1 .^.'•., /y".''''' , . • 1 1 I Ot•.•1-1-2•..L.•'-'':::?-:__. ''r ''i..:. r 2 17,1<... e.,''.'. '`).:••,),:fi . •,..,..;*,, ,„:.'' ‘ 1-7:-----,y7: .. : ''',;%.:''‘: k i'" • ' .".s'V '.,.` -t'sr.:.-:;•".-,'''...% ..;'' %.V ' . I I • "---j. ' .' ' / \\...,'..-- .. •-k.."' •...„..___::::... _____,...,. ::....., ) n , ' ; (2,1 ",-; — .• • •,...- ',---- ,.. ..,- i 1 • , 1 I ti:-'-- --' • • ', 1 - - /,. s-'''' ''1):- ...---------=-17-.--------IN:: ..-;. i . • ; 1 i ; ikilriT\%,l'.;;. r i. :-/i''. • ' s'....7:.:':'-.-:1. % .....-: '1/ .... ..,,,,,i_7" /' .,.9H;27.;',7.-,ri'l I •. . ; ; • /,/ 1 i ;.Y ; • --c, L. --'-------..: -- ; / _..-7/ i ( _."_..,..- ' A c"--.7r iri—-7---. --..' •• -:` '---..\>, :::-"."'--.: • <;/-/-.' / id. ' I I I 't•'+.,- 'f.,- - ,• 1 7' -' ----.-,••- .---":--- ;', . - ' • • I 'I i-••••' 1-,' ". • i.,- -."' . / .• r ------- •-• .72--- --- '•-". --' 4 , 1 1 ' '',,L::'-i i .1 : : '.'5 . : — •,,-...-. - 5----,:"'. '''''''' II , 1 I qi////" .2----;- ' ''''''-' • 1 i .,,. , /i, , •-..., . -- . --:./ / f f` I ,.., i- • i ,i7- z I p ! ! , . ,-1.45, • Ai! 1 1. 1 ti • . tts 5 1 S 1 tr.4 t , I i 1- I-1 4 at ' 1 1 I • ti..1 :' ti 1 I v•••E- .. .,..1. .6 0 ,.........tirt,:,,.. . /1 0 41,7.P1 • L 4 MEMO TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Th'RU: Roger Ulstad, City Manager tt FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Park, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission Recommendation on the Gelco Parking Lot Proposal I. DATE: May 11, 1976 • Attached is a copy of the unapproved minutes of the May 3, 1976 Commission meeting at which this item was discussed. The bottom of the second page containts the specific motion upon which the Commission acted. The Commission expressed concern for more information as to Gelcds future plans for expansion in this area. With this in mind, they suggested that the interim parking solution approval be granted on a one year basis with two one year extentions, and during the three year period a final long range plan from Gelco must be submitted to the City. Included in their discussion, but not specifically referred to in the motion, is the fact that it is understood that Gelco will convey to the City a suitable interest in Parcel B of the survey which they have submitted so as to provide continuity within the Anderson Lakes Park area. Page 5 • U.,rpp'o- . • Choirri cr co:_: ;ntc- '.'.cat when they were al1owcd to build originally, them r•!:a not cuff i.o nt T::eking, and he felt the— L:d to show us how they can control Suture problems. ]r1eLrcn added that Ciro had felt they could solve that problem by the uoe of car cools and bus transportation from l;onkino, but that this had never r:atcrialized. Anderson felt that if this proposal were approved, we are telling them tint every tire they need more parking lots, we will help them out, and 1ms opposed to this. Upton asked whether they will have to come back for approval when they decide to make the parking lot permanent. Jessen responded that they will have to come back to the Council for approval. 15ddleton commented that we are dealing with fragile areas — not flat, barren land with no trees etc.. i•OTICip: lamprey moved. to amend motion to make it very clear that this in no way co�: .its the City to that use beyond the end of the interim period, with the interim bcina defined through negotiation with the Staff and Gelco and be adopted by the City Council. 1•otion died for the lack of a second. Anderson was in favor of Gelco coming in with a presentation of their plans. Jessen asked for a point of information. whether it was meant what Gelco'a present proposal was or for their future plans. Coraiissioners Anderson and iaadleton felt we were opening ourselves to the whole "r.:rl:ing, lot expansion" issue. Jessen explained that Ordinance 135 • covers *•nrking reatlroments for various types of buildings, and added that the Planning Co: ission has historically dealt with this ouestion. Choinic.re suggested building in a reviewal process. He was also concerned with any wash out aroblems that might occur because of a gravel surface. Jensen said ho.l.dina ponds are inspected by the Catershed District on a regular basis. Anderson asked whether the Preserve owned this land. Jessen answered that Gelco is in the j.rocess of buying the land from the Preserve. 1;OTIO11: i:ingrey moved to approve proposal subject tot one year time limit, with two one—year extensions; mutual agreement by the two parties, final plans rust be aubritted to the City; consideration of holding ponds; and re—inforeement of two 1 year check points. Anderson seconded, motion carried with Pierce and hiddleton abstaining. • • 1 r 1 Page 6 ,. • a.. c ion { .1c.:r c91:e to dedication of Parcel B, consisting of 1.3 acres, no r.: ui.rc:cnt before approval of the proposal, which would result in public ownership of shoreline around the lake. Middleton asked what the provisions for run-off would be. Jessen responded that basically they are the same as the last proposal, and are regulated by the '•latarahed District. Anderson was concerned as to time limit on future expansion of their build- ing. Jessen erlained that there were no time limits, and that the Planning Commission will address themselves to this question. Kingrey inouircd whether we had had any trouble with Gelco to this point. Jessen responced that they have been very cooperative. and they hale agreed to no development south of the sewer line. Jessen responded to further questions regarding whether there was any con- sideration of ramp parking - 6 acres would be needed and would have to be purchased from the Preserve, and it was undecided whether there will be underground parking in expanded building. Anderson ca-pressed his opinion that "temporary" basis has a way of turning permanent and asked how long is "temporary". Choiniere arrived at 8:30 PM. iQTIOI:: Anderson roved to recommend to the Council that time limit negotia- tions t:3.e place between Gelco and Council, subject to limit of a valid, reasonable time, on a temporary basis. I;ingrey seconded. Lotion was with- ' drawn by Anderson. Anderson commented that he would like to see some future plans. Choiniere felt that the restrictions and controls for proposals need to be greater. Ho reryucsted that a presentation La fade in order to understand what Colon vas proposing for the future. Fifield left at 9:00 P.1.1.. Concern was expressed for the lack of plans or final design of the proposal by sone of the Comaiasioners. Kingrey questioned the cosmittment that would result from this proposal- whether it would remain a parking lot or whether some other use would be made out of this lot. Jessen answered that it may ultimately turn out to he n building: rather than a permanent parking lot. Pe explained that what they want now is a parking lot on an interim basis. Z36 MEMO TO: Mayor & Council THRU: Roger Ulstad FROM: John Frane DATE 4/6/76 RE: Sewer Utility Rates RESIDENTIAL SEWER RATES Service Area #4 Communities Rate Per Quaterly # Gallons 1000 Gal. Minimum the minimum buys Chanhassen* .50 $7.50 10,000 Deephaven 18.00 Flat Rate Eden Prairie* .50 7.50 15,000 Excelsior .75 7.60 13,000 Minnetonka .60 9.00 15,000 Wayzata .80 8.00 10,000 * in the process of rate review • Our rates were established in March of 1972. Our 1976 Metro sewer bill is at the rate of $ .51/1000 gallons and uses 100,000 gallons per connection for purposes of determining flow. Our present rate structure estimated 60,000 gallons per year, actual use is approximately 75,000 gallons per year. The present rate structure should be $.68/1000 gallons. When we consider a minimum charge a look at what our ultimate rate structure might look like would be helpful ± $18.00 per year for debt service ± 12.00 per year for other City costs $30.00 per year minimum per unit at 0 flow in addition to the minimum we would establish a user charge based on the actual number of gallons using the " winter sewer" concept. This rate would vary yearly using the Metro Sewer gallonage rate adjusted to reflect infiltration. If this ultimate concept is acceptable then we should begin to move toward it. Retention of the present minimum of 60,000 gallons with a $.68 per thousand rate might be the first step. This would mean that approximately 2/3 of the water and sewer customerg. would receive bills above the minimum based on usage. The minimum would be 60,000 gallons per year times .68/1000 usage, or $41.00 + 5.00 for City costs which would be $ 46.00 per year. The minimum for sewer only customers would be set at the City average of 75,000 gallons times .68/1000 + 5.00 or 56.00 per year. Persons objecting to the differential would be encouraged to install meters, however for the $10 per year differential there would not be many initial takers. • In any system there will be infiltration. We currently have a connection about every 231 feet of pipe. The system was designed to accomodate considerably more units, therefore the present connections are bearing an abnormally high, probably 4 times higher than what cohld be considered a normal infiltration burden. For this reason the council may wish to consider some temporary relief. This could be accomplished by not adding the $5.00 per year City cost and transfering-additional funds from the water fund to cover the 1976 sewer deficit. 23',°► • whp/jh 5/4/76 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 31.0 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR IN CERTAIN PREMISES, SERVING OF SET-UPS, AND IMPOSING ADDITIONAL FEES FOR STATE PERMIT UNDER MSA 340.119 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Intoxicating Liquor, Consumption and Display - Set-Ups: No proprietor or his servant, agent or employee of any private Club or public place of business, other than a holder of a valid permit issued by the Minnesota State Liquor Control Commissioner pursuant to MSA Section 340.119 accompanied by a receipt for the payment of the additional fee therefor as hereinafter prescribed, shall permit the consumption or display of any intoxicating liquors in or upon any such premises. No part of this provision is applicable to any proprietor of any premises holding a valid Club or other intoxicating liquor license. Section 2. Additional. City Fees: There is hereby imposed upon the holder of any State Liquor Control Commissioner's Permits issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.110, an additional fee of $300.00 per year which shall be paid annually to the Eden Prairie City Clerk on or before July 1 of each year and a receipt of said Clerk issued therefor; Provided, that upon the initial commencement of an initial permit period pursuant to said State Statute, if a portion of a year has elapsed such Eden Prairie additional fee may be prorated at $25.00 per month, but no such prorated fee shall he less than $100.00. In computing such fees, any fraction of a month shall be counted as a full month. The written receipt • a3(11 I • issued by said Eden Prairie Clerk shall at all times be posted in some conspicuous place upon the premises with said Liquor Commissioner's Permit. Section 3. Inspections: Any private Club or public place allowing the consumption or display of intoxicating liquor shall be open at all reasonable times for inspection by the Minnesota Liquor Control Commissioner or his duly designated agents and by any duly authorized officers of the City of Eden Prairie or the County of Hennepin. A refusal to permit such inspection shall constitute a misdemeanor. • Section 4. Hours of Consumption and Display. No person shall consume or display or allow consumption or display of any intoxicating liquor on the premises of any private Club or public place between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. or before the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on any Election Day in which a state-wide election is held. FIRST READ, at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Eden Prairie, this - day of 1976 and finally read, adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of said City on the day of , 1976. Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) John D. Franc, City Clerk Published in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1976. -2- MEMO TO: Mayor and Members of City Council THRU: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services A.J. SUBJECT: Cash Park Fee Policy DATE: May 7, 1976 . • The per acre park fee has some problems which we have tried to solve. For example, park fee based on four to seven units density is $1500 per acre. The result is that the park fee at four units per acre is $375.00 per unit and at seven units per acre it is $214.00 per unit; thus, we are suggesting the following fee per unit be the final park fee formula. Units Per Acre Park Fee Per Unit Less than 3 $300 3-4 $300 4-7 $250 8-12 $200 12-17 $180 17+ $170 Commercial/Ind. $2,000 per acre The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission took positive action on this recommendation at their meeting on Monday, May 3, 1976. • -13 43 • MEMO TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services M, S SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission Recommendation With Regard to a Task Force to Study and Make Recommendations on Homeowner's Associations At the meeting on May 3, 1976 the Commission reaffirmed it's position that there is need for a task force to study Homeowner's Associations and to recommend some consistent policies for the same within the City. This was first discussed approximately a year ago by the Commission and the recommendation was brought forward at that time. Mr. Pierce can speak further to the discussion which took place at the Commission meeting should you have any questions on the matter. • • • 2Na MEMO TO: Mayor and Members of City Council THRU: Roger Ulstad, City Manager rROM: Marty lessen, Director of Community Services /4,J, SUBJECT: Establishment of Eden Prairie Historical and Cultural Center DATE: May 7, 1976 As we have discussed in a preliminary way with you the Bicentennial Committee wishes to undertake as it's permanent project the establish- ment of an Eden Prairie Historical Cultural Center. This project was suggested by the Historical Society representatives to the Bicentennial Committee and has received very enthusiastic support from the committee. In an attempt to locate a facility for the center we have looked at a number of alternatives including: renting space from a commercial venture, school space, working in conjunction with the Hennepin County Library system and the possibility of a "park house". The Bicentennial Committee has toured the Brown house which we acquired as part of the Anderson Lakes Park acquisition and they feel that it would make an excellent location for the center. Under the terms of our acquisition of this property the Brown's had the right to continue to use the property for residential purposes for a two year period which expires on February 1, 1977. The Brown's have vacated the house as a place of residence already and it is now being used exclusively for office space for the Brown and Cris Construction Company of which Mr. Brown is the president. Mr. Brown has expressed a desire to continue to use the premises for business purposes (office and yard storage) for a limited period of time so that he has adequate opportunity to relocate his business within Eden Prairie. Mr. Brown has continued to pay his rent since the time of the lease first using it for residential and business purposes and now using it exclusively for business purposes. The first phase of the establishment of a Historical and Cultural Center would be locating a home for the Historical Society at which they could establish a work space for their members, a meeting place,and a place to serve as a collection point for artifacts, histories, etc. There is adequate space for these purposes at the Brown house even with Mr. Brown continuing to occupy the lower level for his business office and the yard for equipment storage. The house is a large four level (counting the base- ment and pitched roof attic) with a great deal of storage and work space on the second floor. The first floor contains a large living room dining room area which could serve nicely as the meeting space for the Historical Society. Mr. Brown has indicated that he would be happy to work with -Z3gi3 -2- them to vacate this area on a regular basis so that they could hold their Sunday afternoon meetings at the center. There is a good condition barn on the premises which could be used for storage of old farm equipment • and other artifacts which the Society has collected or been promised. RECOMMENDATIONS In an effort to meet the desires and needs of all involved and in an attempt to fullfill the intent as well as the letter of our purchase with Mr. Brown we would propose as follows: 1. That Mr. Brown be allowed to continue his occupancy of the premises for business purposes through May of 1977. He will continue to pay rent at the rate of$225.00 per month and will pay all utilities for the premises. The City will provide written notice one hundred and fifty days prior to the date at which he is to vacate the premises. 2. The Eden Prairie Historical and Cultural Center be established at the Brown house (historically cal led the Viska House)with the understanding that further detail must be developed as to the specific operation of the facility which will take both time and money to establish; thus providing for the Brown Business use of the premises until the date previously specified. The City will assume the responsibility for maintenance and utilities of the building at such time as Mr. Brown vacates the premises. 3. The Bicentennial Committee will declare this the permanent project in commemoration of the Bicentennial event and will raise money for the basic developement of the center including: office equipment and furniture, methods of storage, building redecorating, etc. Future monies for additional center development will be raised through other methods as presently unspecified. SUMMARY The recommendations above,while not perfect for any one party,would appear to represent a reasonable compromise for the three parties involved in this project (the Brown's, the Historical Society/Bicentennial Committee and the City). Other potential uses on the site should be considered including utilizing the barn as a community facility for theatre, music, etc. The Metropolitan Council Capital Improvement Program for Parks has programed into it an amount of money for the development of the Blacklock Nature Center at Anderson Lakes Park for the fiscal year 1979. Prior to that time a permanent location for the center must be identified and this is not to say that it is absolutely impossible for it to continue to be housed in this facility. The permanence of the Bicentennial project is intended to be the Center not the buildine in which it is located, so the moving of furniture, office equipment, etc. would not result in a discontinuation of the center program. MEMO TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services A. SUBJECT: Further Information on the Proposed Chemical Disposal Site Project DATE: May 7, 1976 • Ken Botrtiack, Project Manager for this project with the Metropolitan Waste Commission advises that the current status of the project is as follows: 1. A final contract with the consultants for step one planning is not yet complete. However, the contract will include a least the following: write standards of judgement for site selection (criteria), identify at least three sites for more intensive study, characterize the "waste stream" in the Metropolitan area and identify which wastes should be accepted at this site. 2. Step two planning will include the selection of one site on which necessary approvals will be solicited from EPA, PCA, EPC, Metro Council, the County and local government. 3. They currently have identified five speculative sites of which two were named in the application to the Federal EPA from which the grant to the State PCA and Metro Waste Commission resulted. These sites are the one in Eden Prairie and a site in Pine Bend. These two sites are included in the five speculative sites now but no final determination has been made as to whether or not they are in fact the two best of the five. 4. No radioactive products will be brought to the disposal site. Things such as acids, paint sludge, caustics, etc are the materials projected for disposal here. They will be secured for long periods of time in barrier wells with an artificial membrane to eliminate seepage and ground water contamination. 011 -2- When a site is found in a particular area and sound data developed upon which they can justify further study of the site they will • contact the community in which it is located so as to explain an assess various problems associated with the site including soical and environmental impact including ground water problems, transportation problems associated from trucks hauling chemicals for disposal, odor, etc. The State PCA is appointing a coordinating committee for this project to be comprised of approximately 24 people from various backgrounds and affiliation including governmental agencies, citizens, etc. A recent conference held by the National Solid Waste Association included sessions on chemical waste disposal sponsored by the Minnesota Association of Commerce and Industry, Metropolitan Intercounty Council, The Metropolitan Council, Pollution Control Agency and so on. Among other items discussed at the conference were: the needs of the industry, definition of what is a hazardous chemical waste, disposal technique, and financial impacts. I've asked that we be placed on the mailing list of the Pollution Control Agency and the Metropolitan Waste Commission to be kept current of their deliberations on this matter so that we can follow it very closely, particularly as they may close in on selection of a site and if Eden Prairie is to be involved. MEMO TO: Mayor and Members of City Council THRU: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services/m... SUBJECT: Lake Usage at Staring Lake DATE: May 7, 1976 The question has been raised as to the regulations and restrictions governing the use of the Staring Lake boat access point. I've discussed this matter with representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and are advised as follows: • 1. There are no restrictions as to motor size which can be launched through the public access area. 2. No overnight camping is permitted at the public access site. 3. They plan to make some improvements to the access this summer, primarily the installation of a concrete ramp which they hope to accomplish by mid-June which will make for easier boat access for smaller and lighter water craft. 4. They are not planning any dredging or other activity at the access to make it easier for the larger boats to launch. 5. There is one gentleman who uses Staring Lake on a regular basis, who secures a permit from the Hennepin County Water Patrol, to set up a water ski course on the lake. The conservation officier said that he has received some complaints on the water skiing on the lake during the opening of the fishing season, but other than that has not received any complaints nor does he see any problem with this use. We have received only a very occasional call or complaint on Staring Lake over the last number of years and again its been from fishermen early in the season who have been inconvenienced by the water skiing activity. This conflict is of rather short duration during the summer because the lake gets so weedy so fast that the fishing is restricted after early June. The regulations for the use of the public access are established by the Department of Natural Resources. Any lake regualtion should be adopted in concert with them. DNR is also responsible for the operation and maintenance of this access and are attempting to take steps to not only improve the facility but also to improve the maintenance of it during the summer. ,07 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ul.stad, City Manager FROM: Carl Julli.e, City Engineer DATE: May 6, 1976 SUBJECT: Maple Leaf Acres PROPOSAL: Mr. Loren Irvine is requesting City Council approval of the Final Plat of Maple Leaf Acres. The proposed plat consists of 26 lots. Lots 1 through 8 are zoned RM 6.5. The remaining 18 lots and Outlot A are zoned R1-13.5. HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved on February 3, 1976, per' Council Resolution No. 1087. Zoning to RM 6.5 (Lots 1-8, Block 1) and R1-13.5 (remaining 18 lots and Outlot A) received second reading by the Council on March 23, 1976, per City Ordinance No. 314. The Final Plat now submitted for approval conforms with the approved Preliminary Plat, except that Lot 8, Block 1 shown on the Preliminary Plat has been divided into 2 residential lots (R1-13.5) which is consistent with the approved zoning. Said Lot 8 was previously proposed for duplex units. VARIANCES: None requested. The rezoning agreement for this project disallows any variances for lot sizes less than 13,500 square feet. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing and street lighting will be installed throughout the development in accordance with city standards. The street name "Tartan" is missing from the submitted Final Plat. Correction will be required before release of the hardshells. The right-of-way width of Tartan Curve should be increased from 50' to 60' as recommended in the Engineer's Report on the Preliminary Plat dated January 27, 1976, and required of collector streets in Ordinance No. 93, Section 10, Subd. 3(1). The alignment of the proposed Tartan Curve and existing Tartan Curve at Duck Lake Trail is in violation of Ordinance No. 93, Section 10, Subd. 3(5), requiting a minimum 150' centerline off-set at street jogs. Con- form-once with this requirement nay cause some hardship (loss of one lot) which the Council may wish to further review. A3s1 -2- Easements for sanitary sewer installed by the City have been shown on the plat. The easement through Outlot A should also be shown. Reference should be made to the document number covering the Xe- spective casement throughout the plat. PARK DEDICATION: A cash contribution of $300 per platted lot will be required for the plat. This will be due upon application for a building permit. Additional park dedication, as per Rezoning Agreement dated March 23, 1976, (the area referred to in item 2a) will be ful- filled when Outlot A is platted and a cash contribution of $300 per platted lot in Outlot A will also be required. BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit approved by the City Attorney shall be posted in an amount approved by the City Engineer to cover the cost of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, streets, street signs, and first year costs for street lighting. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Final Plat of MAPLE LEAF ACRES subject to the requirements of this report and the following: 1. Execution of the "Developers Agreement." 2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the amount of $780.00. 3. Receipt of payment for topography provided by City in the amount of $265.20 per invoice No. 2718. 4. Approval by the State Highway Department of a plan for driveway access to T.H. 101 for Lots 1-7, Block 1. 5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. CJJ:mc • • 2352- .fi • • May 11, 1976 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 1137 RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION Or A FEASIBILITY REPORT (I.C. 51-290) WHEREAS, a petition has been received, is proposed to improve: I.C. 51-290, Street and utilities on Heritage Road. and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost off' the improvement, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of Rieke, Carroll, Muller Associates, Consulting Engineers, and that a feasi- bility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed, advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost, assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Prane, Clerk • • • V • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT • To The Eden Prairie City Council: The undersigncd property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council to consider mol.ing the following described improvements(s); (General Location)1 Sanitixy Sewer j 0 14Q_ It Waternain Storm Sewer • Street. Paving 7:17 Of, Other Street Address or Other Legal Description of Names of Petitioners Property to hP Served (Must Bo Property Ceners) /6/5 1.-6 416( Vioeg /01641 e /251.17i-d Sti:4->k4,5,0t. Ld'*7 '1, vtVik - kk.,70. X • 91CC 14 (IVKA.CWZ6.46', 4 :"P P (For City Use) Daio Received • Project No. —— Council Consido7ation --• . . . , . . , ! (2145) 1 \ 1 I. 1 1 ♦, i *O r -fa 4-p,0S ea .. s Ear. ' ,5J nO. O O , t'if h h Q PART OF 2 -' 0 = Er cr_,F- V i . , 9 ° iN t 43 __ _ : u_<„. . .. _ l ..,__ .,.., ___ . ,... a ScAr`.e It=2A0'i '�� 3 e a A. 1 a S '4 P PoSED i 6 r d g 8 t5 . ��� 1.p oseR , „ ; Rattr1OHERI ).a.cat a '•' : 4S 5 • tP . 3 Y K - •♦ J 43 4 1 yr, 11 .fie gr '. it�ta�STA!!T LMER" ?' AVE. ) R•• to .A.1 f 46'12 y i • I . • "rl 4: j''•I "s ;clP M 3 9 9 !r W 13 22 �"• =w c, �t}^.�� •- ~ •8ortn ,4 .tom ,l _ Ear'._ - -3- :7 .,, ,�d�'IV; 4 .'. �''r +yE ty ` .�0 .� )\ �h," IS .t �`q L� • 3 -e' ' :: 4 ' a 18 '' t:'.5"E'_ °°1.1.`c - ▪ S _/ 24,;=23 '��► f+.;• tl'. • 4 1I M' t ° • ' .5'` 0<� < •M`, r J.Er4r 1 AMtT , 2 1'. �1-° Nlt�ie r �gi 22 ss s ' t v c1.1. \ $ ^ ' ; c ,�?i_ ` t .3�' ▪ '1 y si t , ' N 19 a.,o at vs _If.4 1 ,ril r 20 •r (2)25) •F nee 12'i:- J�f , PARK 1 ° y STATc -- •�WEST- — i---- a May 11, 1976 t CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 1138 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT • AND CALLING FOR A HEARING (I.C. 51-282) WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the City Council on May 11, 1976, recommending the following improvements to wit: • I.C. 51-282, Street improvements on Preserve Blvd. from E-W Parkway to Schooner Blvd. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Sect. 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 1st day of June, 1976, at 7:30 p.m. at the Eden Prairie City Hall. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Fcane, Clerk CLERK'S APPLICATION LICENSE LIST May 11, 1976 CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) McCall & Company • CONTRACTOR (Multi-family & Comm.) ABJ Enterprises, Inc. GAS FITTER Grendahl Mechanical, Inc. HEATING & VENTILATING Grendahl Mechanical, Inc. GARBAGE & REFUSE COLLECTION Village Sanitation, Inc. FOOD ESTABISHMENT Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for the licensed activity. ( (.4 Reb&cca Querncmoen, Deputy Clerk May 7, 1976 , STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 02-20-76 8822 VOID CHECK 20.75) 04-23-76 1209 VOID CHECK (113.00) 04-27-76 1308 STATE OF MINNESOTA Bldg. surcharge report for 1st quarter 2,811.65 1309 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL Reserve capacity charge for the COM?MISSION month of March 19,750.50 1310 STATE OF MINNESOTA Sales tax report for the month of March 513.71 1311 POSTMASTER Bulk mailing fee 64.68 1312 WALTER E. BALL Easement - Ring Road 21,675.80 04-28-76 1313 HENNEPIN COUNTY Taxes - Ring Road project 7B4.2O Ball property 1314 INSTY-PRINTS Services-Public Safety dept. 17.25 04-30-76 1315 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION Sewer service installment-March 13,156.90 1316 LESTER BENSCH Easement-Ring-Read I * 9 12,225.00 1317 POSTMASTER Bulk mailing fee-Planning dept. 26.02 05-07-76 1318 A & G DRAFTING Supplies-Engineering dept. 59.10 1319 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO. Parts & oil for equipment 79.41 1320 A & If WELDING & MFG. Steel brace for antenna-Public Safety dept. 10.50 1321 AKINS FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment for Fire dept. 1,561.00 1322 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO. Duplicate keys - Public Safety dept. 61.75 1323 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS, INC. Rental of rubber tire roller Street dept. 59.50 1324 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC. Furniture-Public Safety dept. reimbursed by donations 327.81 1325 BEACON PROOUCTS CO. Field lining compound-Park dept. 294.00 1326 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS Crushed rock-Public Works dept. 700.81 1327 CADILLAC PLASTIC Poly sheets-Forest Hills play structure 128.46 1328 CHAPIN PUBLISHING Bid ads-Preserve Area F Div. 84.24 1329 COOK PAINT CO. Paint-City Hall, Water dept. and Park Maint. 263.68 1330 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY Equipment parts 33.21 1331 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS Equipment parts 13.45 1332 CUTLER-MAGNER CO. Quicklime-Water dept. 876.90 1333 CITY OF EOINA Ice rental-Park & Rec. dept. 197.50 1334 LARRY DOIG Mileage expenses 3.40 1335 DALCO Cleaning supplies-Water dept. 122.64 1336 EDEN PRIAIRE SCHOOLS Gasoline for November thru Feb. 5,012.10 1337 EDEN PRAIRIE CENTER Refund for softball 135.00 1338 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS Ad for employment 4.00 1339 JOHN FRANE Expenses 26.28 1340 GROUP HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance 359.86 1341 GUY'S AUTO SUPPLY Equipment parts 8.60 1342 JOYCE HOLTE Reimbursement for classes 50.00 1343 HENNEPIN COUNTY Public Safety radios 5,420.00 1344 HOFER COMPANY Office supplies-Public Safety 14.08 1345 HENNEPIN COUNTY Taxes-Blacklock property 493.16 1346 JACK HACKING Expenses 62.80 May 7, 1976 05-07-76 1347 RICHARD HOLLOWAY Health inspection services- Feb. & March 575.00 1348 HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGLNDOFF Services-Ring Route 2,785.16 ' 1349 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ARSON INVESTIGATORS Dues for Ed Sherman 15.00 1350 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE Book-Public Safety dept. 7.19 1351 CARL JULLIE Expenses 100.00 1352 ELIZABETH JOHNSON April services 262.50 1353 MARTY JESSEN April expenses 104.75 1354 JEAN JOHNSON Expenses 8.85 1355 JUSTUS LUMBER CO. Materials-Water dept. improvements 45.07 1356 JONES CHEMICALS Flouride and chlorine-Water dept. 401.60 1357 CONNIE LEE ij Refund on golf fee 18.00 ' l 358 SUE LANE �,,_ a Reimbursement for supplies for bicentennial program 37.40 1359 LANGE TANK Repair to water tank-Water dept. 166.95 1360 LEEF BROS., INC. Rags & rugs 79.65 1361 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION June sewer service charge 13,156.90 1362 MINNESOTA FIRE INC. Pumps for Indian pump cans-Fire dept. 127.40 1363 MEDCENTER HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance-May 558.26 1364 ROBERT MARTZ April expenses 109.10 1365 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE DEPT. ASSOC. Dues 45.00 1366 MAYVIEW RADIO Repairs to radio equipment 138.84 1367 WA. MUELLER & SONS Sand-Public Works dept. 6.88 1368 MASON PUBLISHING CO. Law manual-Public Safety dept. 14.00 1369 MINNESOTA STATE MANAGEMENT ASSOC. Dues- 15.00 /1370 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Report-Finance dept. 1.50 1371 MURPHY PLUMBING & HEATING Repair service-Water dept. 19.07 1372 NORTHWESTERN BELL Services 1,176.81 - 1373 NORTHWEST EMERGENCY EQUIP. Resuscitators and first aid equip. for Fire dept. 693.47 1374 POLLY PETERSON Refund on garden plot 5.00 1375 PETTY CASH To reimburse petty cash fund 49.24 1376 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Employees insurance 2,361.52 1377 PAKO FILM SHOPS Police equipment 349.29 1378 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN Equipment repair service-Fire dept. 106.20 1379 JOIN PALMER Service work on new cars 225.00 1380 PHOTO-QUICK Film-Public Safety dept. 7.76 1381 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Employees pop 82.25 1382 J. C. PENNEY COMPANY Speedometer caliberation-Public Safety dept. 22.25 1383 SANDRA STEPHENS Macrame instructions 115.12 1384 STARKLY LABORATORIES Refund for softball 135.00 1385 SIR KNIGHT CLEANERS Cleaning services-Public Safety - dept. :- 4.44- 17.50 1386 DONNA STANLEY April services 97.50 1387 WAYNE SANDERS Expenses 23.94 1388 W. GORDON SMITH CO. Gasoline and fuel oil 219.24 1389 JOHN TEMAN Reimbursement for property appraisal-Ring Road 300.00 May 7, 1976 05-07-76 1390 TOWN MEETING '76 Bicentennial fund contribution 150.00 1391 TAYLOR'S MANUFACTURING Buddy bumpers, frame & bolts -Public Safety vehicles 106.60 1392 LORNA THOMAS April expenses 20.57 • 1393 ROGER ULSTAD May expenses 100.00 1394 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Uniforms-Public Safety dept. 834.98 1395 JEFFERY WHITE Refund on gymnastics 5.35 1396 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE Employees health insurance and life insurance withheld from payroll 521.54 1397 SANDRA WERTS April expenses and reimbursement 26 04 for printing 1398 WILSON LEARNING Refund for softball 135.00 5.00 1399 JONATHAN ZIPF Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1400 DEBBIE KNOLLS Refund for firearm safety 1401 TED R. OTIS Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1402 ERIC MAE Refund for firearm safety 1403 BYRON MOE, JR Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1404 BYRON MOE Refund for firearm safety • 1405 ERIK ANDREW LEE Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1406 STEVEN GEBERT Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1407 JOE HAYS Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1408 CHRISTOPHER SOLBERG Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1409 ROBBIE WILLIS Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1410 JIM CHANDLER Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1411 SCOTT WRIGHT Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1412 DANIEL NASH Refund for firearm safety 1413 CRAIG ROSS Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1414 ANDY BREN Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1415 DAVID NELSON Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1416 MICHAEL NELSON Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1417 KRIS PEARSON Refund for firearm safety 3.D0 1418 DOUG HAMILTON Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1419 RICHARD HARGROVE Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1420 DAN SEERY Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1421 BRIAN TRUEMPI Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1422 SCOTT TRUEMPI Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1423 GREG HASTINGS Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1424 JEFF MOENING Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1425 GREG LINDAHL Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1426 BOBBY LINDAHL Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1427 BRENT FIELDS Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1428 YVONNE WILSON Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1429 RICHARD PATTERSON, SR. Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1430 RICHARD PATTERSON, JR. Refund for firearm safety 3.00 1431 ELIZ SIMONS Refund for firearm safety 3.00 d TOTAL 114,145.44 $ STATE OF' MINNESOTA 'A-N I,0•• (Wrie O!' TOR OOVRRNoR WENDELL R.ANDERSON ST. PAUL 55155 GOVERNOR GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF VOLUNTEER SERVICES May 4, 1976 Dear Mayor: May 16-22 has been proclaimed by Governor Anderson as Volun- teer Recognition Week. It will be a time set aside to pay special tribute to the hundreds of dedicated citizens through- out Minnesota who are volunteering their time and talents to improve the lives and well-being of others.• The Governor's Office of Volunteer Services was established last July. In broad terms, its goal is to promote and expand the effective use of volunteers in the delivery of human services and to coordinate existing programs and efforts. Every community in Minnesota has some projects or programs which are considerably enhanced because local volunteers have become involved with them. Volunteer Recognition Week offers an excellent opportunity for these individuals (or organi- zations from which they are recruited) to be recognized and honored locally. We are contacting you at this time to share the information about Volunteer Recognition Week with you - and to express the hope that local government, through the office of the Mayor, will play an active role in providing visibility and expressing appreciation to the volunteers in your community. If you have any questions, or if I can be of service, please do not hesitate to get in touch with me. Sincerely, Laura Lee M. Geraghty Director LLG/djk a36.,