Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 01/13/1976 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Sidney Pauly, Joan Meyers and Tim Pierce COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Marty Jessen; Engineer Carl Jullie; Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of 1 Youth Member to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. (Term to expire 7/31/76) B. Appointment of 3 representatives to the Southern Hennepin Page 1567 County Committee. III. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 1075, a resolution supporting Federal Revenue Page 1568 Sharing. B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 310, Fee Ordinance. Page 1521 IV. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Report of Planning Director 1. Community Development Funds for 1976. Page 1575 2. Free-standing Commercial Establishments. Page 1586 3. Comprehensive Guide Plan. Page 1587 B. Report of City I_nnin^nr 1. Approve plans and_ eciflca*tons and order advertisement for Page 1596 bids on lateral ;:ev.'er for Cre^kwood I'statea 2nd Addition, I.C_51-280. (Resolution No. 107G). EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Billy Bye, Sidney Pauly, Joan Meyers and Tim Pierce COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Marty Jessen; Engineer Carl Julite; Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of I Youth Member to the Parks, Recreation & • Natural Resources Commission. (Term to expire 7/31/76) B. Appointment of 3 representatives to the Southern Hennepin Page 1567 County Committee. III. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 1075, a resolution supporting Federal Revenue Page 1568 Sharing. . B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 310, Fee Ordinance. Page 1521 IV. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Report of Planning Director 1. Community Development Funds for 1976. Page 1575 2. Ft ee-standing Commercial Establishments. Page 1586 3. Comprehensive Guide PIan. Page 1587 B. Report of City Enrineer 1. Approve plans end specifications and order advertisement for Page 1596 bids on lateral rower for Creekwood f'states 2nd Addition, I.C. 51-280. (Resolution No. 1076). Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,January 13, 1976 IV. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS (continued) C. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study - Recommendation Page 1597 of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. 2. Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission 5-year Capital Page 1604 Improvement Program - Recommendation of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. 3. Communication from Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Page 1614 • Commission concerning the need for Recreational Improvements. 4. Horak and Bren Land Purchases Page 1618 D. Report of City Manager 1. Discussion on whether Council Members should be on various boards/commissions. E. Report of Finance Director 1. Clerk's License List. Page 1629 2. Payment of Claims Nos. 8393 - 8508. Page 1630 V. NEW BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT. OCT 16.;975 `WO J ©NOM anEa GV[O'QOPOLOTA N D O 330 Moho Square Building,Saint Paul, \\\ 1 riy�) T�/p�1 n�'�^-�� ( 0 AVA►I AVA l00000� Minnesota 55101 Phone 612/227-7343 October 13, 1975 �J UVUUVUUU �l Mr. John D. Frane, Clerk City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Frane: The Metropolitan Transit Commission is sponsoring a transit service improvement program for the southern portion of Minneapolis and the south Hennepin County area. The purpose of this project is to ana- lyze the existing bus service and develop new and improved bus ser- vice that is more direct, frequent, faster, convenient, and attractive. We are organizing two Community Advisory Committees, one representing the southern portion of Minneapolis and one representing the south Hennepin County area (Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Richfield) to assure that community review, comments, and suggestions are thor- oughly considered and appropriately i .corporated into the project's recommendations. Our experience indicates that committees of this type are the source of valuable information and advice to improving transit service. Committee members should anticipate attending between six and ten meetings over the next nine months. We would appreciate,your assignment of two representatives to the ' Southern Hennepin County Committee, preferrably one representing the private sector and one representing municipal government. We believe that it would be desirable to consider your representatives who served on the Sub-Area Community Advisory Committee for the Hennepin County Transportation Systems Study as possible represen- tatives on this correnittee. Please inform Terry Hochbein of the MTC (telephone number 227-7343, extension 53) of the names and addresses of your representatives. He plans to schedule the first committee meeting in late October. Sincerely, . ` 4I ,;.ui, ' 1 Camille D. Andre Chief Administrator CDA/TWH/sn /647 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council !Ylnd FROM: John D. Frane, Finance Director THROUGH: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager SUBJECT: Revenue Sharing DATE: January 9, 1976 I recommend the City Council adopt the attached Resolution No. 1075 supporting the concept of Federal Revenue Sharing. The intent of revenue sharing was to place money for specified programs with those responsible for carrying out the program - local government officials. Who can better identify needs, Federal employers or locally elected officials? JDF:Jp Enc. DILL P'REN'Z.ELW'OPMeCIA TNrm Darm n%himm.sorA MR*MAYBEIN CNRIlyd+32N,MANAGER _ 120 VEDIRGAL Summon tMMNIROWlN ORRCHR Muae0.Oua.MWUDNr0 0M01 1020 LONOMORTN WILDING O/h92s•2/7S .�.,2,21 Congressi of the?Buffett*tale's MUM SANDRA MUG.MANAGER 11501 PAAN CUM.DOYIr 000 MT"I r'^ Pou%e of RepreoentatibtO ft.UM PAW.MINNaarA MN10 RICHARD D.W.LLOW lIbOWMO ington.13.0. 2061E 1 p December 16,1975 � 1l NI1 s i ly Mr. Roger Ulstad,Village Manager City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road . Eden Prairie,MN 55343 Dear Mr.Ulstad: SUBJECT: Revenue Sharing 1. Many local officials have asked me about the chances for renewing general revenue sharing. Up until the last week or two,I have always responded that there is no problem and that revenue sharing is certain to be extended. In addition,I have predicted that it would be unlikely that the program would have any new restrictions. 2. In the last several weeks,the picture has changed dramatically. The pressure of our enormous fiscal deficit has begun to weigh hard on some of our Members who would prefer to cut general revenue sharing rather than grant programs which they control. Increasingly,I hear on the floor of the House complaints about money wasted in revenue sharing and threats about terminating the program. A copy of such a statement is attached herewith. The odds on the extension of revenue sharing have dropped sharply. I still believe it can be passed,and that it will be passed. However,I now believe that the conditions • here have changed sufficiently so that it is going to take a full-scale effort to extend the program. • , 3. Therefore,if you favor the extension of revenue sharing,I hope you will write so that I have a new letter for the record. If your local government supports it,I hope you will send a resolution. 4. As usual,I will appreciate any comment,counsel or criticism you may have. Yours very truly, • Br 1( • itS Member of Congress BF:ss Att. • • i 9 THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE WITH RECYCLED name 1 ' December 4, 1975 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE • II 11829 • Mr.HAYS of Ohio.Mr.Chairman,will the gentleman yield? Mr.FItk,N•LEL.I yield to the Wain- . guished gentleman from Ohio. Mr.HAYS of Ohio.Mr.Chairman,my father used to say when he gave me a dose of castor oil,"Actually,you may not like this,but it may do you some good." If you want to save some money,we should do away with revenue sharing. .Every ofliclal In my district Is willing to get the money and they have wasted it In most cases.In my own county,the county commissioners of my own party.spent $150,000 to put glass blocks in the wind- dows of the tail in front of tho bars so prisoners could not escape. The only trouble, we found when summer canto • the prisoners were auflocuUng; so they had to spend another$150,000 to air con- dition it.,It is probably the only air-con- ditioned jail In the country. That is an example of what we are doing with revenue sharing.We are shar- ing revenues we do not have.What wo ought to do is have the courage to tell ' arose fellows back home, "If you need money,go to the taxpayers and ask them to vote a levy or bond issue and see how I• • far you get" • Mr.in,PONT.Mr.Chairman,will the gentleman yield? Mr.1PRIMZELL.I yield to the gentle- man from Delaware. (Mr. nu PONT asked and was given permission to revise and extend his re- marks.) lwssoaAL EXPLANATION Mr.an PONT. Mr. Chairman, a few moments ago I was absent from the floor at an appointment with the House physi- cian and missed the vote on the Stark amendment to this bill.Had I been pros- •. . slit,I would have voted"aye."In order to remove from the bill the capital loss carryback provision of section 1402 of the bill. Mr.CONAI3LE.Mr.Chairman,will the gentleman yield? • Mr.FItENZEL.I yield to the gentle • - man from New York. Mr.CONAI3LI.Mr.Chairman,I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr.Chairman,I cannot leave this at- tack on revenue sharing unanswered. Them is no more important tax reform measure before this House than the ex- tension of revenue sharing.If we want to cant the whole tax system toward regres- sive taxes,toward sales taxes and real estate taxes,then the best way is to re- fuse to enact the extension of revenue sharing. To terminate revenue sharing will move the whole tax sy4r,u away trent pmetrcwr•Ivity,winch snpposrxily is the is- sue Ln lax reform, Mr.Y1tENZiiL.I thank the getUemmrn, and I fierce with him, • • 15(74 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE RESOLUTION 0 1075 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING • Whereas the City of Eden Prairie has used its funds to hire, train, equip and pay salaries of Public Safety Officers Whereas we believe the vast majority of governmental units in the United States have used their Revenue Sharing Funds for similar or other worthwhile, necessary and desirable purposes Be it Therefore Resolved by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that we support the concept of and the extension of Federal Revenue Sharing . MAYOR ATTEST: John D. Frane City Clerk • • • • /-;'/1 • t GleneraI Revenue Sharing Supported MARTIN O.SABO, Speaker,Minnesota House of Reprsenta6ves Testimony presented to the Intergovertwnental Relations and Human Resources Subcommittee of the Government Operations Committee, Nouse of Representatives. Congress of the United • States in October, 1975 New Orleans Mayor Moon Landrieu re- would have a number of options,all equally expounding on the Golden Rule of disastrous: center m "He who Government is quoted asl saying, o Increase individual income tax by 11.4 percent has the gold gets the rule." •Increase corporate income tax by 71.2 As Speaker of the House in the Minn- percent esota legislature,I can fully appreciate •Increase sales tax by 30.1 percent Landrieu's comments and find them parti- •Reduces schoolsb3 .1i7 rnt cularly insightful in getting to the heart of •Reduce aid to aidslocalbygovernments16.7percent t3ti.5 the discussion of General Revenue Sharing. I My advocacy of General Revenue Sharing percent is based upon the program's achievements •Eliminate public welfare aid to families with : dependent children• i as well as fear of the serious fiscal problems •Eliminate all legislative, judicial and levels ifbefveailoShainthesdiscandIued.l executive departments general fund expend- . levels if Revenue Sharing is discontinued. itures Thew are three very basic accomplish •Allow local governments to raise property menu of General Revenue Sharing: taxes by 10percent combined with a 4 percent 1.It has kept the wolf from the door of many increase in individual income tax. • state and local treasuries; 2.It has allowed creation of new programs New and expanded services • • and expansion of existing programs; I don't intend to recite for you a litany of 3.It has fostered a more equitable and accomplishments which General Revenue • progressive means of financing state and local Sharing Funds have made possible in Minn- services. esota. . I,as you,have a healthy skepticism,or more accurately,a positive realism about • A partial solution to the state and local the reports that state and local governments fiscal crisis file with the Office of Revenue Sharing. State and soanl cuttingnmbac are is s. I agree with those who assert that Revenue cre recent study andt back Eseconomic Sharing funds are not"radioactive"and A udy shows the joint economic traceable.The use of Revenue Sharing funds Committeeaseveret that ourt crisis reflects the needs and priorities of different has put a strain iond nee and servi govern- levels of government in terms of their Tocut ability uresourcesto provide poied t wouldu development patterns. A government's use of ma out custoat this pointer revenue depends upon its level of development, mean toea force us to retrench further or to its current needs,its current tax burden, moreinrease our taxes whichare,inx the main, and its community priorities. regressive than wederal taxes. Revenue Sharing, because it strengthens In Minnesota,if alwere ae replace all • state and local General Revenue Sharing the fiscal position of governments,in Minn- moneys which have come into the state,we esota and elsewhere,helps expand existing Minnesota MunicipaMies 6 /J 72' ,..___. _.. • social services and helps to provide new this reform has worked to our disadvantage services. However, Revenue Sharing money in at least one way.Minnesota is penalized is woven into the fah,ic of our total revenue and in the present General Revenue Sharing expenditure picture, so much so,that it is formula because of its level of state income tax. impossible to trace the source of moneys in The current formula in measuring state trying to sort conflicting priorities and establish tax effort provides that income tax collections program levels. in excess of 40 percent of federal income i A more equitable and progressive means of tax liability are excluded in the computation of financing state and local services state tax effort.The most recent data I The lessons which Minnesota has to teach have seen showed Minnesota to be the only relative to the success and continuance of state affected by this 40 percent limitation. Revenue Sharing are not primarily based While the fact that we have been so penalized upon the states particular use of General is regrettable,the data is a further indi- Revenue Sharing funds. Rather,the lessons cation of the high level of effort we have made rare to be learned through an examination in using the more progressive income tax of Minnesota's own state-local fiscal relation- as a means of financing state and local ships. government. What Minnesota has in fact done, according The lesson which Congress can learn • to the Advisory Commission on Inter- from the Minnesota tax structure is obvious. governmental Relations(ACIR), is to The federal income tax is,with all of its "rewrite the'book'on state-local fiscal re- shortcomings,still more clearly tied to lations." ability to pay than most state taxes,and the key to understanding the Minnesota this certainly is true if one combines state experience,and hence the lessons which that and local taxes. In addition,the federal experience has for Congress,is to examine government can collect taxes more efficiently the impact of the state and local tax than many state and local governments. structure and the impact of state aids to focal In Minnesota,the legislature has agreed governments. to raise revenues to be used and controlled 1.Development of a progressive fax by local governments because we are con- I sturciure. Our philosophy and goal over the vinced that it is the only way to raise funds in past four years of tax reform has been to an equitable manner.Sound federal policy establish a means of raising revenues calls for Congress to act in a similar fashion. that is efficient,equitable, and progressive. 2.Sharing the revenues raised by a Looking at the state and local per capita progressive tax structure. A commitment by tax burden,Minnesota's relative position elected officials to raise revenues pro- among the states has not changed signifi- gressively and equitably puts elected officials in I cantly over the past few years. What has an uncomfortable position.The position is changed is that our taxes have become more uncomfortable because it requires a sharing progressive. In 1971, property tax levies were of revenues with others and inevitably in- i 47 percent of all state and local taxes;in volves decisions about control of the usage 1 1975,property taxes represented only 35 of funds. percent of state and local taxes. In Minnesota we do not believe that In 1975,we reached a milestone in our all wisdom,efficiency,and good judgment tax reform when we firmly established that is to be found in St.Paul,nor do we believe even the property tax should be related to that it is all to be found in Washington,D.C. income. In a September,1975 bulletin of the So while it is true that Minnesota continues Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental to be among the highest income tax states,most Relations which summarizes state aid to of the money derived from the income tax local governments,Minnesota ranked second and other statecollected taxes is used to among the fifty states in fiscal 1971 in state • provide local government aids, local school intergovernmental expenditures as a percent I aids,and property tax relief to homeowners of total state general expenditures. Minn- and business property in the state. esota spent 51.5 percent of its total budget Minnesota has been at the forefront on intergovernmental expenditures. This was among the states in tax reform; however, exceeded only by the state of New York, lanuary 1976 • 7 • 1673 . I 1 which spent 59.5 percent of its budget on intergovernmental expenditures. i Our own data corresponds with that of the ACIR. In the 1970-71 biennium,when the t state's General Fund appropriation was$2 billion,approximately 50 percent of the funds • were passed through to local governments. In the 1976-77 biennium,with a General Fund appropriation of$5 billion,over 64 t. J percent of the funds will be passed through. . i Those congressmen who oppose Revenue 1 Sharing because they believe in the letter . i of Moon Landrieu's Golden Rule will probably r shake their heads in wonderment at the Minnesota legislature.While not all of the 64 1 percent of our funds are passed through with a no strings attached,a very large percentage of • them are.And this,i believe,is very important j to strengthening local governments. i The lesson which Minnesota's own Revenue Sharing has to teach Congress is . that It isn't necessary to control every dollar given to state and local governments, '• • even when these amounts are substantial. The success which we have had with our own • form of Revenue Sharing has been substantial. We attribute this success to the fact that we i act,whenever possible,as partners with • local government and we foster self- ; determination. , Need for congressional action If we are to have sound federal-state- ; • local fiscal policy,Congress must enact laws • to maximize the use of progressive taxes while ensuring responsible use of Revenue Sharing funds by state and local officials. Congress should also,I believe,reduce the current restrictions on use of General Revenue.Sharing money.State and local governments need flexibility. I not only urge you to continue General Revenue Sharing at the level of funding at least equal to that which has been proposed by the President,but I further suggest that it be made a permanent feature of federal- state-local fiscal policy.And it is essential, I believe,that your decision be made as soon as possible to allow slate and local governments adequate time to make their budgetary plans. ! , Mayor Landrieu last summer said that 1 'General Revenue Sharing has been the best 1 ' thing since ice cream."It is more than a . 1 ? dessert to most of us—to most states,it has " • become the main course.21 H 8 i /514/ • tt • • . . .... El 1, • 114 - r ii—i'\••••••;..;•-rs. 4 2 r P!1 n I 7 I1 • /5-75 MEMO TO: Planning Commission City Council • FROM: Dick Putnam, Planning Director DATE: January 8, 1976 SUBJECT: 1976 Community Development Block Grant Application The 1976 Community Block Grant Program will provide approximately 35,000 dollars to the City of Eden Prairie for completion of eligible projects selected by the community. In 1974 the City of Eden Prairie elected to designate the $19,000 Grant for use in construction of the first phase of the Bikeway/Bikeway Plan . It was determined that the connection from Edenvale Boulevard along Valley View Road to Round Lake Park was a high priority project. Work at the staff level has proccced to accomplish this project during Spring and Summer, 1976 . If the project cannot be accomplished due to conflicts with the Valley Viet: load improvem•=nt project, then the money may be shifted to other trail sites such as the County Road 4 program. The City may use the $35,000 for 1976 under the C.D. Block Grant for continuation of the bikeway proposal , or may choose alternative projects that are eligible or share the money between different projects. The time schedule is very important and included along with this memo. It requires that Eden Prairie have its application to Hennepin County by February 17th. This allows only four weeks for citizen participation, discussion of alternatives, selection of a project ( s ), anti preparation of the grant application. I have included some preliminary information for your review. It may assist you in understanding the reouircments of the program relative to citizen participation , the broad objectives of Hennepin County's participation in the program, and the eli„ihle end ineligible activities as specified in the Act. At the meeting I will highlight the projects that were• discussed last year and try to answer questions regarding this year's application. • I would hope that you will have suggestions as to ways to gaining effective • • and quick community and citizen input , as well as suggestions of potential projects which might be worthy of funding. Due to the time constraints we will be publishing notices in the near future. • • DP:jj 15 c URBAN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION TIME SCHEDULE January lu, 1976 Today's Meeting-Pld^%u^^n "ti, F,iv'e Weeks The Cooperating Communities must complete: public hearing requirement, indivi- dual applications, and determine • local goals for the Housing Assistance Man. • February 17 Cooperating Communities Applicants must be submitted to Hennepin County. February 27 Application due at Metropolitan Council for A-95 Review. April 27 Application due at HUD. • • • • • • • /51 7 TENTATIVE • t ALLOCATION OF URBAN COUNTY COMMUNITY • t DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS V RICi° Second Year Amount $. 138,222 Brooklyn Park 30,745 Champlin 0, 5 Corcoran 1 Crystal 158,046,06 • Dayton 11,286 Deephaven 18,609 A( Eden Prairie 135,600 Edina 15,507 Excelsior • 7 • Golden Valley 78,0792,831 Greenwood 1837 Loretto 31,887 • Maple Grove 34,251 Medina 110,278 Minnetonka 0,920 Minnitrista 12,3 45 Mound 96,553 New Hope 29,114 Orono 29,111 Osseo 60,683411 ' Plymouth • 160,6 Richfield 5 8 Robbinsdale 72,28029,539• St. Anthony • 9 St. Ponifacius p2,2 2.938 Shorewood • ' Spring Park • 9,273 9,034 Tonka Bay 19,978 8 Nay7ata Municipal $1,444,000 • • --- - 108,688 Hennepin County • Grand total $1,552,688 . • 1573/ Inner Ring Suburbs Population - 1970 925 CrAtal 44,046 Edina Edina 24,246 Golden Valley 23,180 New Hope 47,231 Richfield 16,845 Robbinsdale 6,886 St. Anthony • • • Developing Suburbs • Brooklyn Pirk 26,230 Deephaven 3,853 Eden Prairie 6,938 3 Excelsior 2.5687 Greenwood 6,275 Maple Grove 35,776 Minnetonka 2,878 Minnetrista 7,572 • Mound . 6,787 Orono 18,077 Plymouth 4,223 Shorewood • 1,287 Spring Park 1,397 Tonka Bay 3,700 Wayzata Outlying Communities • Corcoran 1,656 Champlin 4,704 Dayton 2,631 340 Loretto •Medina 2,396 , • O 2,908W Osseo . St. Bonifacius 685 TOTAL 336,622 . /5`�9 ._ CITIZEN PARTICIPATION GUIDELINES Item 3 of the Community Development Block Grant Assurances requires that "prior to submission Of its application the applicant has: (a) Provided citizens with adequate information concerning the amount of funds''available for proposed community development and housing activities, the range of activities that may be undertaken, and other important program requirements; (b) Held at least two public hearings to obtain the views of citizens on community dev,:lopment and housing needs, and (c) Provide citizens an adequate opportunity to participate in the Development of the application and in the develupment of any revisions, changes or amendments." • In order to ensure appropriate citizen participation in each of the cooperating cities' application process the required activities should be initiated prior to the nicking of any decision related to use of the community's share of the Block Grant Funds. The following are suggested methods which could be employed to comply with the citizen participation requirements: 1. News releases • 2. City wide mailing 3. Mailing to community interest groups • 4. Establishment of Citizen Advisory Committees 5. Community news letter G. Distribution of public hearing announcements • Attachment A is the draft of a letter to citizens, either groups or individuals, which discusses what the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Program is, how much money the respective community is likely to receive and how the funding allocation is determined, and a description of the projects which can and cannot be undertaken with the Community Development Block Grant Funds, the letter should inform the citizen of the upcoming public hearings and outline the function of the hearings. • The letter is to serve as a vehicle for introducing the communities citizen to the Community Develoiac.nt Program and their opportunities for involvement in developing the application. Attachment B is th sucgea•t:ed format. for the public hearing notice. This year Hennepin County as the progrr.m applicant should be named as a joint sponsor for the required public hearings. Hennepin County will make every effort to have at least one staff member at each hearing. • As a result of the recent HUD Monitoring Team Review of the Urban County'Program,' Hennepin County is requesting that minutes be taken at all public hearings. Also if mailings or news releases are used copies of the mailing, releases and distribu- tion list of each should be submitted to Hennepin County. /63O • Attachment A • Dear (Individual Citizen, Community Organization, Boards, Committee or Commissions) In order to provide additional community development and housing assistance programs for its residents, the City of has joined with more than 20 additional cities and Hennepin County to submit an application for federal assistance under the Urban County Community Development Block Grant Program. As one of less than 80 urban counties in the United States, Hennepin County is entitled to receive a share of the Community Development Funds. The actual amount of funding is determined by the total population, total extent of poverty.and the total extent of housing overcrowding within those cities cooperating jointly with the county to submit the application. In the first • year allocation of funds Urban Hennepin County received $738,000 of which our City received $ . It is projected that these amounts will approxi- mately double for the second program year. The amount of funding which cacti cooperating city .in the Urban Hennepin County program receives is determined by using the same formula which the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development uses in determining Hennepin County's share of the total amount available for distribution. • The city of is requesting your participation in determining what the community development and housing needs of our city are. In making these determinations as to the expenditure of our share of the Community Development Funds, it is necessary to work within the limitations established by HUD. A listing of eligible and ineligible activities for use of the Community Development Block Grant Funds is attached. Two public hearings will be scheduled to aid the city staff in obtaining your views and those of others as to our community development and housing needs, notice of the public hearing will be published, in as well as being sent directly to you. It is the City's intention to involve the residents as fully as possible in the development of this year's Community Development application, if you have any questions, please contact . Members of the city staff are available to meet with any group of citizens which would like additional information on the Coanun•ity Development Program. • • • • • 7531 OBJECTIVES OF THE URBAN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (1) The elimination of slums and blight and the preventiongoborhooa f blighting influences and the deterioration of property and community facilities of importance to the welfare of the community, principally persons of low and moderate income; s ch are ental t health, (2) The elimint,tion of and public welfare,cthrough ncode lenforcement,mdemoliti n, interim safety, rehabilitation assistance, and related activities; (3) The conservation and expansion of the Nation's housing stock in order.to provide a decent home and a suitable living environment for all persons, but principally those of low and moderate income; (4) t of ty nd y of userviices,Gprn and incipallyvfornpersonseofulowlandamoderatetcoincome, whichch are which essential for sound community development and for the develop- ment of viable urban communities; (5) A more rational utilization of land and other natural resources and the better arrangement of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and other needed activity centers; (6) The reduction of the isolation of income groups within communities and geographical areas and the promotion of an increase in the diversity and vngaopportuniti neighborhoods personsooflllower spatial income and thentration of revitalization ousing opt of deteriorating or deteriorated neighborhoods to attract persons of higher income; and (7) The restoration and preservation of properties of special value for historic, architectural or esthetic reasons. • • • • • /63 ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES FOR USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS • ELIGIBLE ACTIvITILSS: 1. Acquisition of real property which is: a. Blight.ed, undeveloped, or inappropriately developed. b. Appre; -ictc for rehabilitation or conservation activities. c. Appropriate for preservation or restoration of historic sites; conservation of open spaces, natural resources and scenic areas; provision of recreational opportunities; or the guidance of urban development. d. To be used for the provision of eligible public works, facilities and improvements. e. Other public purposes, including the conversion of land to other uses where necessary or appropriate to the community development program. 2. Acquisition, construction, reconstruction or installation of the following public works and facilities: a. Neighborhood facilities b. Senior centers c. Historic properties d. Utilities e. Streets f. Street lights ' g. Water and sewer facilities ' • h. Pedestrian malls and walkways 1.. Parks, playgrounds cad ether facilities for recreational participation. j. Flood and drainage facilities where assistance is. unavailable under other Federal laws or progrems. k. Parking fr.cilities,solid waste disposal facilities and fire protection services end fecilieies in areas, or to serve areas, in which corceunity development ectivitics are to be carried out In o conpiehensive monne[. 3. Code enforcca:cmt in deteriorating areas in which enforcement, together with public improv:'a;fits and services to be provided, may be expected to arrest the decline of the area, 4. Clearance, demolitien, removal and rehabilitation of buildings, and improvements. 5. Projects directed to.the removal of material and architectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessibility of elderly and handicapped persons. • • • I6d9• •i • Page 2 -- Eligible activities under Community Development Act 6. Payments to housing oeners for losses of rental income resulting from temporarily holding housing units to be utilized for relocation of those displaced by program activities. 7. Disposition of real property acquired for community development activities, provided that the prcceds shall be spent only for eligible community development: activities. 8. Provision of necessary or appropriate public services not otherwise available in areas, or serving residents of areas, where community development activities are, or trill he, underway. Such. services include improvement of community public services and facilities such as those concerned with the employment, economic development, crime prevention, child care, health, drug abuse, education, welfare, or recreation needs of persons living in those areas; and coordinating public aria private development programs. • 9. Payment of the non-Federal share required in connection with a grant-in-aid program that is an eligible activity undertaken as part of the community development program. 10. Payment of the cost of completing a project started under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949. 11. Relocation payments and assistance necessary as a result of community development activities. 12. Activities necessary to develop a comprehensive community development plan; and to develop a policy-planning-management capacity to more rationally and • effectively determine the co:+enenity needs, set long-term goals and short- term objectives, devise programs and activities to meet the goals and objectives, evaluate the progress of programs in accomplishing the goals and objectives, and carry out management,coordination and monitoring of activities necessary . ,for effective planning implementation. 13. Payment of reasonable administrative costs and carrying charges related to the • planning and execution of co:;mity development and housing activities, including the provision of inforroAion and resources to residents of areas ;n which other Orm;!nity develo,m nt and housing activities are to he concentrated. Su:.h Ir:fo c tien and resources Ore to be pertinent to the planning end execution of such activities. MLICIUF f,r.TiViTUS • Any type of activities not described above is ineligible. The following list is illustrative and does not.constitute a complete list of all ineligible activities. 1. Public facilities not specifically mentioned in the list of eligible activities. • such as: a. Facilities for the general conduct of government, such as city halls, police stations and other buildings used predominantly for municipal purposes. • • /628 Page 3 -- Ineligible activities under Community Development Act (continued) b. Stadiums, auditoriums, sports arenas, concert halls, cultural and art art centers and similar facilities which arc used by the general public primarily es spectators or observers, except that cultural, art, museum, library end similar facilities may be undertaken as part of a neighborhood facilities project. c. Schools generally, but excluding neighborhood facilities or senior centers in which classes in practical or vocational activities (such as first aid, homemaking, crafts, etc.) may be taught. d. Hospitals, nursing homes and other medical facilities, except for a neighborhood facility cr senior center in which health services are part • of the ser;'ies offered. • 2. Operating and maintenance expenses in connection with community services and facilities are not eligible, except for the public services and interim assistance described in eligible activities. Examples of ineligible activities include maintenance and repairs of water and sewer and parking facilities, and the salaries of staff operating such facilities. 3. Except for the costs incurred in carrying out community development programs, expenses required to carry out the general responsibilities of the local • government are not eligible. as 4. Partisan political activities such/expenditures for use of equipment or premises for political purposes, sponsoring or conducting candidates' meetings, engaging in voter registration (except if it is part of a community-wide registration drive sponsored by the local unit government). • 5. Construction of new housing. 6. Generally, no funds may be spent for direct income payments for housing or for any other purpose, such es payments for income maintenance and housing allowances. • • • • . j . i MEMO TO: Planninc; Commission FROM: Dick Putnam, Planning Director DATE: December 3, 1975 SUBJECT: Free-standing commercial establishments The staff is raising the question for your consideration regarding the potential for free-standing small sized commercial outlets. The most numerous examples of such commercial operations would be the Foto Mat booths located in parking lots of community or regional shopping centers. We raise two questions regarding the potential for these developments : First-is the small one or two-man stores a method of merchandising which the City of Eden Prairie believes reasonable, or is it inconsistent with the thinking of the City relative to commer- cial development. Second- if they are a reasonable commercial venture, are there regulations which should be formulated to guide their establishment so as not to adversely affect traffic safety aesthetic qualities of commercial areas or other City ordinances. Other cities such as Brooklyn Center and Edina have confronted the problem without having their ordinance & review tools geared to such developments and hence have had little or no control or input into the location and design of the structures. It has been pointed-out that the merchandising currently used by Foto Mat(the drive up facility)can be used for many, many different types of commercial establishments. For example, there is a postal station in the parking lot of Knollwood Plaza which utilizes vending machines for stamps, packages , etc . There is no question that a group of vending machines could be located in a similar arrangement. Also the commercial sale of pharmaceutical products or other convenience goods could conceivably be merchandised through a system of booths with automated vending services or one or two employees. If the intent is to regulate the location and design of such businesses various requirements might be considered such as;minimum floor areas, site areas, parking requirements , traffic safety considerations, sign controls, setbacks, etc. If the Planning Commission has concerns or opinions regarding free-standing commercial operations perhaps a recommendation to the City Council would be appropriate so the Council may consider this matter. /�7 tt • • F5t2rJet Cizkr:Alc—/P'tfv4 kq'P-413-4t% 11•44-• .• / /- AIyiçt•-% LC;) • ,60 ; • EDEN PRAIRIE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • 4 WORK PROCRA - TASK BREAKDOWN Prepared by Brauer & Associates, Inc. 12/15/75 . ka�'i ‘`: \lii75 Planncw:: Principal Pr City: Manager M Finance F Planner P1 Planner P1 Building B Technician T Technician T Attorney A Secretarial S Engineer E Public Consultant C Parks Pk Safety PS Task Planner m/h City Staff m/h 1 la. Pre-Planning Consultation . initial meeting . (Pr) 2 (M) 2 . prepare/review work plan (Pr) (P1) (S) (T) 16 (M) (P1) (Pk) (F) (E) 5 . prepare/review contract (Pr) (P1) (S) 8 (14) (P1) (F) (A) 6 . design/review - FORUM (Pr) (P1) (S) 42 (M) (P1) 4 • . make arrangements-FORUM (P3) 4 (M)(P1) (S) 16 , . participate - FORUM (Pr) (P1) 12 10-15 people 72 . prepare summai:y/con • - elusions - FORUM (Pr) (P1) (S) 22. (M) (P1) 4 . design/structure CB FORUM (Pr) (P1) (S) 26 (M) (P1) 2 . . make arrangement-CB FORUM (P1) 4 (M) (P1) (S) 16 (5) Progress Review Meeting/ Report (Pr) (P1) (S) 10 (M)(P1) (T) 8 . participate CB FORUM (Pr)(P1) . 12 (14) (P1) 12 • •sunmiary/report CB FORUM (Pr) (P1) (S) 20 (M) (P1) 4 ($3,560) 178. . lb. Update Base Map • . review all plats-divisions . (P1) (T) 10 • draft base map data (P1) (T) 40 . check/review (Pr) (P1) (T) 6 (P1) (T) 16 . final. draft•-phato-repro. (T) 8 ($120) IC. Inver,tiaation-Plan Data • . • (1) Demographics-research (T) 16 -projections (P1) (S) 16 " -graphics (T) (P1) (S) 52 " -reports/ review (Pr) (P1) (T) 15 (P1) (S) • 16. " -consultant (C) 20 ($700) 35 . •/5la 1 3 -2- , Task Planner EL City Staff m/h (5) t P prs Review Meeting/ Repoort (Pr) (P1) (S) 10 (M) (P1) 8 Re ($2,080) (2) Sociolocical/Cultur.al . research (P1) 16 • design questionnaire- (C) (Pr) (P1) 14 (s) (T) (S) 16 . print/mail/tabulate 16 , interviews 10 (C) ($1,200) • analysis/report (C) (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) • 80. ($2,088) 108 (3) Regional Relationships . research (P1) (T) 12 • text and graphics (P1) (T) (S) 20 . analysis/summary (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 20 ($400) 26 (4) Land Use • . research (P1) (T) 16 • text and graphics (Pr) (P1) (T) 40 . analysis/surranary (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 10 ($1,000) r0 i (5) Progress Review Meeting/ ' Report (Pr) (P1) (S) ' 10 (M) (P1) (T) 4 ($200) (5).Natural Conditions research (P1) (T) 28 . text and graphics 20 (P1) (T) (Pk) (S) 52 . analysis/summary (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 40 ($1,200) 60 • (6) Transportation research • (P1) (T) 16 ' . text and graphics ' (P1) (T) 10 (P1) (T) (E) (S) 46 . analysis/summary (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 40 ($1,000) $0 (7) Utilities • . research 01) (E) (T) 25 . text and graphics 20 '(P1) (T) (S) 50 . analysis/summary (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 40 ($1,200) 60 /639 -3- Task Planner m/h City Staff m h (2) Comunity Facilities . research (P1) (T) (S) 25 text and graphics (P1) (T) 20 (P1) (T) (S) 404 . analysis/summary (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 608 (M) (P1) ($1.,600) (5) ProD_c s Review Meeting/ (Pr) (P1) 10 (F1) (P.l) 4 • Report ($200) id. Field Observation . windshield survey (Pr) (P1) (T) 35 . . community meetings (Pr) (P1) 25 • . review Council - Board minutes & attend 28 meetings (Pr) (P1) 20 . walk over select sites (Pr) (P3.) . prepare summary report/ 4 notes (P1) (Pr) (T) (S) 30 (M) (P1) . ($2,760) 138 (5) Progresr. Review Meeting/ 4 Report (Pr) (P1) (S) 10 (M) (P1) ($200) id le. Community Seminar.-Reality • . design and structure (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 40 (M) (P1) 4 stimulate interest (Pr) (P1) 25 (M) (P1) 4g (P1} (S) 16 . arrange facilities (P1) (S) 8 . participate, (Pr) (P1) (5) 16 (M) (P1) 4 . review/summary (Pr)(P1) (S) 140 40 (M) (P1) (5) Progress Review Meeting/ (Pr) (P1) (,) 10 (Pi) (P1) 4 Repor� ($2,580) 10 1f. Analysis of Total Data . analysis (Pr) (P1) (T.) (S) 60 (M) (P1) . graphic presentation (Pr) (P1(T) 90 (P) (Pk)ctc. 20 . text (Pr) (P1) (S) 60 ($4,200) 210 lg. Staff Presentation (Pr) (P1) 10 (M) (P1) (E) (Pk) --___ ($200) 10 (F)etc. 25 (5) Progress Review Mooting/ (Pr) (1'1) (S) 10 (M) (P1) 4 Report ($200) 00 -4- Task Planner m/h City Staff m/h 2. Coiununity Seminars(2)- • Goals • '-'- . design and structure (Pr) (P1) (T) (C) (S) 60 (M) (P1) 4 . stimulate interest (Pr) (P1) 16 (M) (P1)etc. 8 . arrange facilities (P1) 4 (P1) (S) 16 . participate (Pr) (P1) (T) (C) 32 (M) (Pl)etc. 30 . review/summary . (Pr) (P1) (C) (S) 58 (M) (P1) 4 • ($3,400) 175 3a. Guide Plan Doveloomcn'--'-•-- • goals/objectives • demographics . socio-cultural • • regional . land use (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 250 (M) (P1) (E)etc. 40 . open space/recreation . transportation • . utilities . community facilities • ($5,000) • (5) Progress Review Meeting/ Report (Pr) (P1) (5) 20 (M) (P1)etc. 10 ($400) 3b. Planning Policy Framework • research (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 54 (P1) 4 text development (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 26 (M) (P1) 8 . refine/revise (Pr) (P1) (S) 20 ($2,000) Terti. . • • • • • • 811 t TIME, COST AND PAYMENT SUMARY t • . B&A City ($) (hours) la. Pre-P):•n (Pr) (P1.) (T) (C) (S) $3,000 (all) 140 lb. Fasc I;:to • (Pr) (P1) (T) 100 (P1((T) 74 lc. (1)Dcr o raphics (Pr) (P1) (T) (C) 500 (P1) (T) 100 • (2)Soc/Culture: (Pr) (P1) (T) (C) (S) 1,600 (P1) (T) (S) ($1,200)40 • (3)Regional (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 200 (P1) (T) (S) 32 • (4)Land Use (Pr) (P1.) (i) (S) 800 (P1) (T) (S) 60 (5)Natuzel (Pr) ( i) (T) (S) 1,000 (P1) (T) 80 (G)Tran:;por.tation(Pr) ) (T) (S) 800 (P1) (E) (T) 62 • (7)Utilities (Pr) (T) (S) 1,000 (P1) (E) (T) 75 (8)Community Fac. (Pr) (P1) (T) 1,000 (P1) (Pk) (E) (T) 69 ld. Field Ohser. (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 2,200 (M) (P1) (E) • 10 . le. Comm. FORUM(1) (Pr) (P1) (C) (S) 2,000 (all) 40 if. Analysis (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 3,000 (M) (P1) (E) 20 lg. Staff Present. (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 200 (all) 30 2. Comm. FORUM(2) (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) ' 2,500 (all) 62 3a. Guide Plan (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) • 4,500 (all) 38 3b. Policy Frame 2,000 (all) 30 4. Progress Mtgs. (Pr) (P1) (T) (S) 1,600 (all) 80 • ESTIMATED PAYi•7SNT AND STAFF TIME - BY MONTH B&A($) City(hrs.) January $ 2,000 ' 140 February 1,600 150 , March 2,100 72• • April 2,000 140 May 2,800 1.86 June 3,400 50 July 1,700 30 August_ 2,000 52 September 2,000 33 October 1,200 47 November 3,200 40 neccmher 1,000 38 January 1,000 22 February 2,000 36 1,040 $28,000 I59A t.S........:7,2,1 TIM, CPUliCIL A.„.., ary.St-FF e:R.fteirl ?owl/e r.eir.r. ri-Ata.4.512. *ea e--1.2.1:111A- igrc.:13/401.if.:, r'-• i,V5/76 V.ItcricAt(v.vt. Subrojk WV 16.00.) tcur.i,, cat dAati,tzei'muirlin•ch Fas:1 NV.a.,,te,,,:-•t,:p.,02i, regvo.,,,...0 1. reamc.,.i 0.4 •fre;t4-teteca4., GA.o,Vrxitow, ewo. ity24./.sta-,,,(oi vie,,I;41 .,,,,erwito 4 mt..*s 104W ,i\ CAYK.Or'd,....:...-tfiltal,..0 01:1'4,4k0f ttloki..4.'.* elpt.44,..1 ,..,44 3 (— _1•.::-,t,-,•:---.—c./..-.4-.1--,...Y:tc.,.-... (,. 'W N 0 ) .1 - 1Lt a +vsrt, 4- • os aro mn:v.i,-32(n t-ni 15.6) V _--- ollirll'iS (i•-t's..4.1( C.Lu '''''---tr :) 1 C,;;•,..r,v;',..„, Virreme. Cirmi•Ax•cAr-Aaratmunk •pr:.-44 isf..4.64., i Li/t,:q7:. •tvol:44,trio a Co...licApp...tt. in '3'71Fi:.Vt.7.-.0. \., 'Re(MVO...I.,"%n j • z two,ci ;I OrAta.(17.44:-Inroi-ar.i.cAvisnicarAl : 2 Pannwol hWtAAimtves OvOr3 iatst 2 V/Iv/74 0 r Vr• :,'.'s 1,:..,-..A . is ,,,L) t.......,0,, 0,4.-V.vw.•;:.2.4. r:).••' ,,,•,,,,Lt,.,„4„,,,,, ...--„it.,,ectr, („fi.7•-•i) , g (""ns-Lv''c'.1'7-4'1 t''',,...,-,170.•),:•, ---- t.. a P-C4)12.1,44?eiwte 41 212. .1 1.'::?) tit.".4.-eipAircS 0 cramciLi, thvbckyttiswess, amp:m uttitsmtrif E"..s.>•40%7 71,:k7 6,sitts.s.sweir. auNEM -Zut-s Cooia/ s"-Vlanniyol tuAl.;!:....•..v.i...T.,!zwyri Colledns onui. 0 c.:,,,,re,v-.,,etht, pr,t/tvnirakirr- : . . 117 n'otc.t 4r.,ovt..r•L 4 . • • ‘b . t.. 1:5 .4 • 1/1/76 e Um:,A4z,StrA 1 I 61-1%.vi:t Infainwn . , ..... 6.,..o..).1.....,..4., DeTt416 I,...)::Lf LIrAtj::xycjv tIV.,11.--.:143. i a'.yscs• to,n1.,,..z..., ob flf,,,,,,,, t-k.....-o.. c_nld.2.•ral• • • .• • , . ..: - • I59 .. 1 lcOARDS RsSIDarG/t.mn.: 1 i' FS.AUPJti,72 er ct @OR0rt1Ys Quiz 'Y Ft?..vil • 4/1.ad')Gxr.rbk,k Ki (::u1c4..c4a tyia.- . t 7.,6.Lsit tN k lt/iw•cri a •f,urq toci�i•%✓,, r. g J t S%it �4M" I'. (?r�r..r�-1rtn.w f.Y S C:9;r \ •('i!.atR-°.I:ua. �. •541ntn l�ta \ r • Zi 5/1?�5'w f .�j l{.'., S itch P�,�ft a A.-ez : .:. CyrnmC:4WZ1 i=u-zut�c�"F•+aul.a� sh,ttx cod-co/4-ss«va Salecla X I 60 FAA..not,' roBUAlS £K clo.66 cen. . (arnct?•(�aa�.%a. / p au gakcc.Cvc&a470uo . l • L M it. ". - 6 / iG �ry Mut l` � =Wit, ^ La'1'AM.... .,...1 y) t C'e.r.::,±f weld h•.imtnfw'Ktuf •(i,:.at.-T..,..••.t- CC}11Y3Cm �a /I:r41F •Ih IuW'L':J ,IS//6 T oL Oa cwt..Y J� ,7fi2/76 1. a�l:�, Gt..; t g� U ����'GuinJ � i3<<+s='.0 ri, C:,t /:n;kiat-) v Vc,<,i.x rc C:c..:di tF:!'r:sr c'd i.r_rt' •Ar.•r,.i:„: 2 StC;.lha.• awl. Six,eIL.V=.W.!`')Rtutaro—•` Q J ' . tC9 its Z a4 4he and 164- •Sarnm01) /fxf• I '(2. ea.ta.6 _ L(�,���� J •►»lciura R()Jntcttnl-riento..:b'i) Acbulf3� a) ------ e ----s......._ 0 ----17..---- lo140 C. CP'-S-Cti‘-. rtip..) (14...i...-4.41,,0,4 A,: CcI.,..,..„„44,„,13. • t 8? •••:' Veace ILA wc.e...ret....e... 4e) VA- Wel 4- P&L...-. • e t.,.../0,........4- 1...3, PeCi.en"CA. , e..;5! -....-.......—,,.... E„..... ,......---. i:11:11/4),.Mare,140- . D'Cly. ,i....14... 0.1:•.I- C.4,1,i 0.! 1:G.,lik:^-,.Ate_S.verstati et : • Coyn,e,g4,1 tr A:v.:1, zeal.:••••-i:,:i.,P,-.-.,-:. (1..;:,-- eretruo 1„...v.eto e-S•C .... 1•3 ) . C.144 DI •••••.. . . •er,•.•,..,.„,,,,,... •hat:4010u ili..,,.....-....... . ,..-........ .2 Wnirr P LA g..1 . 14.4FT(LW 1 . . C. . . ' --'..fr• Yeolt caut . et..eonee...e2 Rve.4.1.$0- it.:4%.• igitai!fir41 rotA;..ticekliw fe". 44 oi,("1"...47e. ci ) i,,J.:Aei ?<won, e •P.t.e.o.P....,.. - . 0 em--- • p.--... A.-- . (ft-) frA10- :. 0.1. 1 frreu."4,41e1 .....:...: tiomtee..o>L•of) ...reee. • • . Ow.eee,,:ytzer, 1:1:torre"..*.r czb,I taw . i.rofe..c-:.974,i ave.:a Vt-IJI VIM, ....r..,r-....,...,. P-strY . V,;„11.':"tc.1.11.711a44:41 .6""22Sxrious)P..p.f..? tl•rrg- . , liz4/7% P.kro.4.* • -rie." 1-1.vhersq.:74,....64.0,..1...a. -five4. !larch"r.i.1 CaS. • , • . . • • . . . f . . • . . . i . I • i 69 5. • i ..... .. ..—— ....-..- .. . -.• •.-,- January 13, 1£ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 1076 • RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND . SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVER- TISEMENT FOR BIDS ON PROJECT SAN 75-1-08, I.C. 51-280 WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through McCombs-Knutson Assoc., Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvement, to wit: I.C. 51-280, Lateral Sewer for • • Creekwood Estates 2nd Addition and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin in advertise- ment for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approval plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 2 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened at 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Monday, January 26, 1976,,and considered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, January 27, 1976, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor • ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk • t MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission/14,1, SUBJECT: Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study • DATE: December 30, 1975 At the December 15, 1975 meeting the commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study as prepared by the consultant, Brauer and Associates, calling for the acquistion of the conservancy zone and the management of the transition zone along the creek. The staff is preparing additional information for the commission about the cost of acquistion and the cost and scheduling of improvements anticipated by the study. The motion of the commission on this matter is as follows: "Anderson moved to approve the Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study, and send it to the council with approval. Upton seconded, motion carried unanimously." The Commission has discussed, in a very preliminary form, the matter of an implementation program for the Purgatory Creek Study. Some of the actions that have been discussed by the staff and with the Commission include: 1. The possibility of soliciting Metropolitan Trail Funds for the corridor acquisition and development. 2. The amount of land which might be dedicated to the City through development and gift. 3. The amount of land controlled by the Flood Plain Ordinance. 4. The possibility of other encroachments into the Flood Plain and Corridor as development occurs along the creek. 5. The amount of tax revenue realized by the City from private own- ship of this land and the potential i pact of acquisition of the land as recommended by the study. 6. The possible uses for areas along the creek in terms of recreational potential. 7. The possibility of joint funding with the Watershed District for all or pert of the land included in the study. The analysis of these potential implementation tools has been in a preliminary form to date. However, the staff has prepared a parcel by parcel analysis . of all of the land along the creek so that certain basic information could be derived, Each parcel within the Flood Plain in the conservancy zone was analyzed as to its potential for land development, and some judgements were made as to what could be acquired through tradeoffs or dedication and which parcels -2- would have to be acquired through purchase. I should stress that this is a preliminary analysis based on some gut reaction, but I feel that it is e basis from which to discuss implementation of the study. Tire results of this analysis are as follows: 1. Flood Plain Acres Within the Conservancy Zone to be purchased. 395.2 acres at a cost of $604,116 (estimate). 2. Flood Plain Acres within the Conservancy Zone to be acquired through tradeoff or dedication. 404.41 with an estimated value of $438, 970. 3. hand within the Conservancy Zone to be purchased. 189.80 acres with an estimated cost of$1,151,558. 4, tLand radeoff. 1931.6 acres withe } zone anestimated value oft$699 122h dedication & These totals include all of the land within the Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor conservancy zone. They do not include any of the transition land which the study recommends be managed by the City to enhance the corridor, but not to he acquired by the City. Some land within the conservancy zone was "factored out" because of preexisting 2 o ditiAlreonsy committedchas1. to open residential development on the property. n space such as the Edenvale Golf Course. 3. Improve for industrial develop- ment such as the Edenvale Industrial Park, etc. The total cost to implement the recommendations of the study, as estimated by this analysis is $1.756 million dollars. The total acreage of the Open Space Corridor would b dedicated e approximately 1200 acres with the total value (purchased props y Plu property) of 2.84 million dollars. MJ:md I• `il • • t f Werner W. Schulze 9411 11.�5 fii41 NORTH HRd.CRFST COURT • EDEN PRAIRIE.MINNESOTA i{iq t . December 10, 1975 rs, ?• Er. Marty Jessen City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 • Dear Mr. Jessen: . In 1972 when we were thinking of moving to the Twin Cities area, we were most favorably impressed by the seemingly well coordinated and foresighted guide plan for the city • of Eden Prairie. I am sure this has a lot to do with the fact that we now live here. Our house is located on Worth Hillcrest Court near the Purgatory Creek and we sure like the area as well as being residents of Eden Prairie. Of course, we would like to see the plans come to fruition, especially with regard to the parklands along the creek. • About the flood plain between Valley View Road and the Hillcrest Courts itself, we feel it should be left in a wild state to harbor beavers, pheasants, deer and all the other small animals and birds it attracts. It is an ideal area for wildlife and Eden Prairie should regard herself blessed in having such areas as this, the Anderson Lakes and the Minnesota River valley within its boundaries. These nature habitats are important absets of this city and should be preserved and protected. These are the important things that this city still has, that other communities have lost long ago. Let's keep Eden Prairie distinctly different. Our own and the future of our children will be enriched by it for the rest of our lives. Sincerely, p /letAl I5 '9 WHOLESALERS OF MEXICAN FURNITURE&ARTCRAFTS Showroom-Warehouoa 2652-54 Boca Okla Blvd. 19r LI 6-21C fROWNSV1LLE,TEXAS 7852A Dec. 19, 1975 1 • I Mr. Marty Jossen Eden ['rairie, Minn. • [year Mr. Jessen: About two years ago we talked to an engineer in Eden • Prairie, about our land along Purgatory Creek and were informed the city might buy same, and would have an answer for us in twu to three menthe. To date we have not heard anything. We have about 15 or 16 acres of land, Tract F, if this is to be bought for a park along the creek, we would naturally wish to sell it all because what would be left wv,uld be a narrow strip, worthless to anyone. Kindly advise us if any disposition is made concering our property at the muting we heard you were having • et this time. Thenkyou. Very truly�� Paul J. De Lecour . . • /400 • 0 its Box 110 Palm Resaca Park Brownsville, Tex. 78520 Mr. Marty Sessen, Eden Prairie, Minn. Dear Mr. Jessen, I understand there is to be a Council' Meeting on a proposed park along; Purgatory Creek. If the city is to acquire property along Purgatory Creek, I hope they will consider buying all of my property on Sunnybrook Road. If the cit:, acquires the land along the creek then I will not be able to sell the rest of my property as there would not he sufficient land left for five acres to sell with my house and five acres with the duplex. Please inform me of any development in regard to this property. :;inoerely, Mrs. Hilda Baguet Box 110 Palm Rocaca Park • Brownsville, Texas. 78520 /6)I 17109 Duck Lake Trail Eden Prairie, MN. 55343 December 6, 1975 Air. Marty Jessen Director of Community Services City of 7.ion prairie 89,9 Eden Prairie hold �. 1:den Prairi.:, :07. 55?4; Dear Mr. Jerson: Thank you very kindly for the ti.r,e afforded my brother and me at our meeting ia. yot'.r efi5c , 2r1d4. iiovember 21, 1975. As I mentioned to you personally, it is most gratifying to be able to have staff members in our city who are not only courteous, b"..t alco solicitous and aware of the citizens' needs and problems. Relative to our discussion, and in behalf of our mother, Yrs. Julia A. Kocher, we hereby offer to sell to the City of Eden Prairie, the following parcels of property: • Plat 55705, ::action 5. T m. 116, Range 22 Parcels 2400, 3000 and 3220 The above parcels could be broken down, with specific regard to park acoiisi- tion, as shown ielow 1. Eight/ten (8/10) acres - Purgatory Creek Corridor 2. " - Virgin hardwood forest 3. Remaining acreage - general playground area, etc. Again, our thanks to you. We aro confident this matter will be presented to all concerned ,trties in the beet interests of the City of Eden Prairie and. Mrs. Julia A. Kucher. Most sincerely, (Mrs. Arthur J. Rogers)' 17109 Duck Lake Trail r,:tho_r:.r ti 1: Phone: 938-b137 Yois letter i written with • �� �r, r.y full k o:Jede and “a.;rovnit /'/�C/ '•9e l:G�h�r -�}-� t,::d I tie: that yu ccr.ti,;ua your William F. 'Sucher, Sr. comrunicstions with my daughter 16609 West 62nd Street and son, sirnators of the letter. Phone: 938-1592 • . Julia A. Kuchor Dated: 7.i • MR: - Attach. k-F • 16609 West 62nd Street Eden Prairie. MN. 55143 ADD•TIUM: Letter to Mr. Marty Jessen dated December 6, 1975 In conjunction with the offer by Mrs. Julia A. Kucher to sell land for park purposes, we the undersigned, do hereby offer to sell to the City of Edon Prairie, the following property: Parcel 1210, Plat 56705, Section 5, Twp. 116, Range 22. It is our understanding that approximately three (3) acres are in the proposed Purgatory Creek Corridor area. and the remainder in the proposed transition area. The only qualification in this offer is that we remain owners of our home and an approximate 3/4 acre of land. We believe it to be in the best interest of the Gity of Eden Prairie to include this parcel with the offer by Mrs. Julia A. Kucher. Respectfully submitted, ��4G4°J''/mac{.a'� �C,/ Mare A. Kucher / �/®� f 'J. �^"�L William Y. her, Sr. Dated:l)scembar 6. 1975 mr • 160 MEMO TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council tt FROM: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission SUBJECT: Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission Proposed . Capital Improvement Program DATE: December 29, 1975 At the December 15, 1975 meeting the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission took action as follows concerning the proposed Capital Improvement Program. "Upton moved to recommend to the Council support for the Three Park Program as presented in the Parks and Open Space Commission Five-Year Capital Improvement Program outlined in memo of December 12, 1975, and request cost figures on Purgatory Creek Study Program to be prepared for the next meeting. Anderson seconded, motion carried unanimously." The Metropolitan Capital Improvemnt Program includes three park sites in Eden Prairie at Anderson Lakes, Bryant Lake and Lake Riley, and these are referred to in the 'Three Park Program" eluded to above. Eden Prairie would receive $3,476,500 from the program as proposed. In addition the Commission discussed the possibility of submitting the Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study for inclusion in the linear park funding section of the Metro Capital Improvement Program. The staff is preparing additional information on this matter for the Commission's consideration at the meeting on January 5, 1976. MJ:md . • MEMO TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, Mayor and City Council TtHRU: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services/4.T: SUBJECT: Status of Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission Five Year Capital Improvement Program DATE: December 12, 1975 Last summer the City adopted concepts for development of the three regional park facilities within the community: The Anderson Lakes, Bryant Lake,Lake Riley. With the adoption of the conceptual master plans the staff presented information to the Metropolitan Council so that these would be included in the regional recreational open space system plan. The Metro Council Staff and the.Parks and Open Space Commission have been reviewing the master plans submitted by all the implementing agencies and have put together a draft Five Year Capital Improvement Program for the implementation of the system plan. The five year total for acquisition and development for regional perks is $96,452,089. Of this total $3,976,500 is allocated to three Eden Prairie Park Sites. On Wednesday December 10, the Environmental and Transportation Committee of The Metropolitan Council met in joint session with Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission to review the draft of the Five Year Capital Improvement Program. They recommended to the full Metropolitan Council that a public hearing on the plan be set at the earliest possible.date. The tenative date of January 21 has been set for the hearing. I would recommend that Eden Prairie speak favorably towards The Five Year Capital Improvement Program and restate its position that all three of the park sites be included ih the regional system plan. Present)y the Metropolitan Council has not resolved the question of whether Bryant Lake or Riley Lake should be included. Both are a part of the Capita). Improvement Program and System Plan to this date, pending the resolution of the question which of the two sites or both ought to be included. Both are significant regional recreational resources and as such should be included in the plan, in my opinion. Rather than attempt to secure approval from the State Legislature for the entire Five Year Capital Improvement Program the Forks and Open Space Commission has discussed a "stripped down model" for presentation of the 1976 Legislative Session. Table four attached shows those items included in the striped down model. One hundred and fifteen thousand dollars is included for acquisition of the Schaitberger Parcel at Riley Lake and this is the only element of the 76 request which applies specifically to Eden Prairie. An additional element of. the Capital Improvement Program is the Trail Corridor Acquisition and development and component. A total of 7.4 million dollars has been programed over the five year period for this purpose. The Nine Mile Creek Corridor is included in the Regional Recreational and Open Space System Plan as a potential regional trail location. I have discussed in a preliminary manner the possibility of including Purgatory Creek to this system so that some financial assistance would be available to implement the recommendations of the Purgatory Creek Corridor study. The response has generally been favorable and we have been encouraged to submit formally this proposal if and when the Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study is adopted by the City Council. For the most part Trail Corridor planning has lagged behind regional park planning because of a more urgent priority placed on parks and the relatively young age of trail consideration in park systems. I believe that the Purgatory Creek study is one of the most comprehensive to date in the metropolitan area • in that it accesses natural features of the Corridor Recreational potential transitional adjacent land uses, recreation impacts, etc. For any of the other trail locations to be brought to this degree of detail will require a great bit of time and perhaps the Purgatory Study could serve as a model planning process for trails. The Metro Perk and Open Space Commission will be receiving trail proposals early in 197G, and should Eden Prairie wish to submit the Purgatory Study, as we have been urged to do that would be the appropriate time. I have attached to this memo an excerpt from the Five Year Capital Improvement Program containing itelaa for Eden Prairie_parks and a summary for the five year trail program. In addition the following items are taken directly from the five year plan and copied for your information: 1. Table four shows the 1976 request for additional funding in the metro- politan area. 2. The " for public hearing" notice contains a brief discription of the program. 3. Exhibit A- "priorities for policy plan" for the different components in the regional system. 4. Table one shows the summary of totals acquisition and development for regional parks. Sltt,iM7,1;Y AND RECOMMENDATIONS I believe that the inclusion of all three of these park sites in the Metropolitan Recreation Open Space System is a positive situation. The cost estimates included in the five year programming are for 100% of the acquisition and develoument cost of the thrn : nark sites (exclusive of other costs for.acquisition previously funded and no funding is included for Lake Riley development in this five year program), These cost estimates aro a result of the three master plans which were approved this past summer. I also feel that the inclusion of the Purgatory Creek Corridor Regional Trail would be beneficial to the City of Iden Prairie. Again financial assistance would be available to implement the plan including land acquisition and trail development. /63(0 -3- Because- of this, I would recommend as follows: t That the City of Eden Prairie express its support for the Metropolitan Park and Open Space Commission Five Year Capital Improvement Program for regional recreation.open space and trails, which includes the funding of acquisition of the Lake Riley Park Area and the completion of the Bryant Lake and Anderson Lakes Parks, and that if the Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Stncly is approved and adopted as the cities goal for the creek that it be submitted to the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission for inclusion in the regional trail corridor.system. • • . I • r !,J 0 1 O w o 0 0 Co O N O O 0 0 00 O O t U M O O O O O O ) O '.0 U) ... N t? f? N • O ID .-1 p (I) Q �. VTO . pc V' C' , .' 6� 1 N co O 17. a, is o a> e., m at p F. J .14 m ( a O 47 1-1 a a o I 1--I a.+ a-. • Cr C:w a� COI u, ") C.a o 00 0 0 0 0 0 o rn .-,• N 00 p 0 0 0 0 0 0�0 1 10u, NN0 00 O O'ID U) N c0 V) V' O 0 O 0 O N 0) N N 1-+ N N M 0 Z NN NN CI>N (A. N N p 2 tn. O `a 0 h U) ... N w V) O AL ta co d m m W 0 .54 X .L C itl . ,-u A< .a a a.3 a ° as .4 aw O 7 4 1 ri ,.. M ..r M O NI O w m a a y (a a CC E-, °: 0 'a. N V H . Q N N z L 4 it a x N ro a " 8' 0 n. N Kl• ,. a. .O.1 P. V G V. a r. 0) f aPo oQ U Q c) a0 w m 0 > 0 C m h n CO n CO 44 >" a p d °' �, °: °: w 0 W U 1 as • Table 4 1976 lint:est for Additional Funding I. OUTlAYS 1976 1977 A. Acquisition 1. Immediate Action Sites .8 605,500 5 400,500 a. In Holdings • b. Threatened Parcels • Spring Lake (Dakota County) - 165,000 Lake Elmo 800,000 119,000 Murphy-Han:ehsn 135,000 240,000 Otter Lake 515.000 - • 2. Other Threatened Sltas Medicine Lake 566,700 678,700 Ruin giver Central 237,000 Lake Minnewashta 1,500,000 1,200,000 Fish Lake 350,000 350,000 8t.Paul Fish Hatchery 125,000 - { Riley Lake 115,000 - Minneapolis River Park 500,000 500,000 3. Demonstration Trail 500,000 Subtotal 5,949,200 3,653,200 • 15%Contingency 892,380 547.980 Subtotal 6,841,580 4,201,180 4. Other Sites, Unforeseen Contingencies 2010 QQQ 500,000 Total Acquisition 7.341,580 4.701.180 8. Development Minneapolis River Park 173,000 • St. Paul Hidden Falls/Crosby Farms 528,670 320.670 • Subtotal 501,670 328,670 . 15%Contingency 75.250 49,300 Total Development 576,520 377,970 Total Outlay,Acquisition and Development 7,918,500 • 5,079,150 II. RE'/1NUE'G Existing Ae.J.,riz3tlon , Acquisiti:,,t 741,000 464,000 • Develop::Ion! - 466,000 116,000 1,201,000 580,000 Hew Funding Recalled Acquisition 6,605,000 4.240,000 Developicant 120,000 265 000 6,725,000 4,505,300 Total Funding Required • Acquisition 7,346,000 4,704,000 Development 580.000 381.000 7,926,000 5,085,000 Total New Funding Required: . 511,230,000 _a METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building,Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 For Public Hearing Five Your Capital Improvements Program for Regional Recreational Open Space • .psecess Per Rwelonmentef Leeram The document hes been prepared pursuant to Minnesota Session Laws 1974, Chapter 563,which states, in Suction 4, Sueelivision 1, "The policy plan shall include a five year Capital Improvements Program which se,11 lie rrn ed pertodlcelly, and shell establish criteria and priorities for the allocation of funds for such aceeieiticn cod development." It is the Council's policy to revise and update the Capital Improvements Program (CI?)annually. This proposed five year Capital Improvements Program • is based on ti.c"Development Guide/Policy Plan for Recreation Open Space"adopted by the Metropolitan Council in December 1974,ar;d the combined planning efforts of the implementing agencies, (counties, special perk districts, and scone municipalities) through the master planning process. The proposed CIP includes a prioritized schedule for the acquisition and development of new end existing regional recreation open space components for implementation in the next five year period. The planning process which has led to this proposed CIP is clearly defined in Chapter 563. Following preparation and adoption of the Policy Plan by the Metropolitan Council, each implementing agency prepared and submitted a:tester plan and projected five year CIP for the acquisition and development of regional recreeeen open space within tie jueisdiction of the particular agency. Their master plans were then submtti_:'to the Council for review as to consistency with the Council's Policy Plan. The Metropoiltan Perk and Ceen Space Commission has reviewed these plans in detail and the Commission's review recommeedaeons have been approved by the Council. In the case of certain regional sites, the master plans art:as yet incomplete and require amendment prior to eiigtbia:y of the site for regional acquisition or development furds. This CI?wee prepared from the five year CIP projections included with the master plans. Prioritization of projects follow:: the adopted priorities from the Policy Plan(See attached Exhtbit A). A series of meetings ware held with representatives of each of the implementing agencies throughout the preparation process, and much helpful advice and detail was contributed by that group. In some cases, project cost estimates and timing has been modified to reflect updated information from those discussions. Also, throughout the preparation process, the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission discussed the issues underlying the CIl'and proved••=d direction to staff which has resulted in des proposed Cr?. A key decision of the C:n:.^.fission w;s to not apply any arbitrary fiscal limitation to the CI?. Funds for special use sites and for rites not included in the regional recreation open space system plan have not been included in this CI?for:cozens of currant planning status. However,with those exceptions, the CI?includes basically all of tee seeds projected by the implementing agencies so as to provide thepublic with a full piciere of these nec•ic. Following rr ccseeendetto❑of this CI?by the Commission and review by the Council's Environmental and Transperr.tee.,C,rcni:tee. it Council will sat a public hearing as required by law for an amendment to the adopted Policy l'It.n. ?ellenine the public he Sin„ final recemmerdattons for changes will be considered by the Corees.lizr.ate.'tic Committee,prior to the adoption of the CI?in final form by the Council. Cr?Cotet The Policy elan es edepted by the Council in December 1974, includes a regional recreation open space system plan wl rub Is complete and definitive in terms of existing and proposed regional parks and park reserves. It!cclt:dee a conceptual regional trail system which requires further definition and development. It dee::net luclede seeceal use setae nor epeciel use functions;further study is needed in order to define concepts,needs and plans for tense items. The CIP reflect; this current status of the regional recreation plan. Regional parks and part reserves are include'and t,iIrd os to specific shinn and estimated costs, /',9•J / t specific fundtng level is included for acquisition and development of regional tall corridors. This reflects the high priority betne plecsd by park oiliciels, legislatcrs,the Commission and the public on trail needs in the region. However. pending completion of the above mentioned regional trail system study, the funds • are not allocated to specific trails or trail corridors. That will be done in 1976 following public bearings on the trail plan. There are no funds included in this CIF far special use sites. This is an Issue of special conceal to the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission. After considerable discussion,it was the Commissions view that special use sites should not be included until 1976, following completion of the system study for such sites. The Corumlusten is concerned that this should be done no later than in 1976 because of the size and possible inpertance of eons of the special use proposals such as St. Paul's Como Zoo and Conservatory, marina facilities existing and proposed on the Mississippi River,nature centers and arboretums. The proposed Cl?it shown in Table 1. There are several footnotes in each year of the CIP related to various sites. Thoso notes rclete to specific r:.eomrtendaaons through the master planning process where actions must occur prior to a certain site being eligible for funding. The total five year Capital Improvements Program is$96,452,089 which is 41 percent for acquisition and- 59 percent for development. funding The funding which will be needed to carry out the full scope of this five year CIP greatly exceeds the present bonding authorization under the 1974 legislation(Chapter 563). That authorization is for$40,000,000 of bonds outstanding,but is also limited to an amount for which the principal and interest payments in any one year must not exceed the funds raised by a+mill property tax levy. A total of$40,760,000 has already been obligated either by grant contract or by specific commitment to a project in the 1975 CIP. A public hearing is hemp held on Dezember 10 concerning an additional 1975 grant of$554,000 for Medicine Lake Regional Park. Table 2 summarizes the total grant program for 1974-75. Table 3 gives revenues and expenditert•s for the years 7974-75-7G sf:cwing the utilizeticn of the current bonding authority. It is estimated that less burr$400,000 will remain as an uncommitted balance at the end of 1576. A comprehensive funding recommeneatton for the entire CIP has not yet been formulated. It is the intent of the Commission and Council to do that during 1976 for consideration by the 1977 Legislature. However,certain projects are such that they must be carried out during 1976 and 1977. These represent key acquisitions which will by lost to development if not acquired,and a limited number of critically needed acquisitions and developments in the Cities of Minneapolis and St.Paul. It is the intent of the Commission end Council to request funding of the 1976 Legislature for these Iimtted urgent projects. These projects are designated in the CIP and represent a total cost of$13,011,000. The additional funding needed for these projects is $11,230,000 . This 1976 funding request is detailed in Table 4. • • • / P Exhibit A Priorities From Policy Plan first Priority • Acquisition Development • I e. Parcels in regional parks or I a. Existing regional parks close park reserve sites that are into Metropolitan Area population, under intense pressuro from including redevelopment of development. regional parks in central city and fully developed areas. I b. Lakeshore and riverfront in I b. Multi-use trail demonstration regional park sites. project. I c. Trails for demonstration I c. Existing regional park reserves projects on multi-use trails. close in to Metropolitan Area population. • Second Priority Acquisition Development • II a. Regional parks close in. II a. Existing.regional parks. II b. Regional trails in developed II b. Regional trail corridors close in and urbanizing area. to Metropolitan Area population. • • Third Priori tv • Acquisition Development ' III a. Regional park sacs remaining III a. Regional park reserves. in plan. • III b. Regional park reserve sites lII b. Regional trail corridors. remaining in plan. III c. Regional trail corridors in outlying areas. • a t • a. o a,A G CC C. F: C4 D. 0 N G. 1-- C. o N. a w CC r 03 a w U a 0 m o m m C. . O U' M 03 c Z n u. o . NC� .... •V •-• N C W c U • - yw y C C .pi N . -0..C. . z .D N N . _ Q yy W s a w © A r m CK q r., ., - '� F �+ O N b N 1 3. C 2 w N C. N 0 .1.* N CID O y • w F N z N CT... Co 0 N - m A U Q ,:, 9 C . - Q rC. C1 o N ? I kP w0 e9 m N CO 1 d F ro CC 'CO CC r 00 0i ... e y < .W. rn.. .... N Cmf N U r. 1 S w 1 • E. C f; C m �D O 0 4 S F 03 s n . a s ; o $ 0 <• p t» 4 G C9 (y r i M±MO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission M.J. SUBJECT: Need for Recreational Improvement • DATE: December 29, 1975 At their December 15, 1975 meeting the commission discussed their individual priorities for the need for recreational improvements in the city. A copy of the summary of those priorities is attached to this memo for your information. The commission agreed as follows at the December 15 meeting: 1. There is agreement on the need for a park bond issue of money to finance recreational improvements. 2. There is a need to hold informational meetings to receive citizen feelings prior to any referendum. 3. The commission would like to discuss with the City Council, in e meeting early in 1976, their feelings about specific needs so that the commission can know the Councils interest prior to citizen informational meetings. The following motion was passed unanimously by the commission at the {, December 15th meeting. "Kingrey moved to request a meeting with the City Council at which time we would discuss their interest in a park bond issue and suggest to them our feeling that a park bond issue is called for and also that neighborhood type informational contributions should be received prior to any referendum. Choiniere seconded, motion carried unanimously." MJ:md _ MEMO TO: Park, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services • DATE: December 12, 1975 SUBJECT: Individual Commissioners Priorities for Recreational Improvements Following is the compilation of the Commissioners' Individual priorities for recreational improvements. ,Lrry Kingrey Bond Issue Question#1 1. Neighborhood playgrounds $520.000 No change from previous Bond Issue 2. Hikeway/Bikeway Trails $250.000 a. Develop trails along Scenic Heights Road between Co. Road 4 and Mitchell Road b. Valley View Road c. DuckLake Trail 3. Parks $530.000 Development of Round Lake, a youth sports complex acquisition of 250 additional acres of Community Park Land TOTAL 1.3 Million Stay at essentially the same total figure of Question 1. Small adjustments may be necessary for a new referendums. Dick Anderson Priorities of Question 1 of bond issue should remain the same. Bill.Carens 1. One bond issue in the range of $1 - 11 million to include: a. 8-10 neighborhood Parks b. Scaled down bikeway trail system to include trail along Co. 4 c. Parkland and open space acquisition and development Ii. Trails A. Co. Rd 4 from T.H. 5 to Co. Rd. 1 to Flying Cloud Fields. B. On Valley View from Co. Rd. 4 to Ring Route. C. From Lochanburn along Duck Lake Trail to Sterling Field. From Sterling Field a trail across school and city property to Round Lake Park. III. Community Parks Development $500.000$200.000 A. Round Like B. Byiant Lake $200.000 C. Starring Lake $100.000 $500.000 IV. Land Acquisition $350.000 $225.000 A. Riley Lake Park B. Mitchell Lake Road 25.000 $125.000 It is important to inform the voters that this money is needed for "seed" money to redeive government funding. At times grants are available a 3 times the amount put up by local government. Marve Erickson One Bond Referendum Question to include the following: 1. Development of athletic fields, number to be determined by-future need projections of EPP.A. 2. Neighborhood facilities 9-10 neighborhood parks as set forth in prior Question $520.000 3. highway/Bikeway $250.000 4. Two Community Parks $200.000 • ;/:I ; 2. Before determining the final items in a new bond referendum each commissioner should meet with neighborhood groups, homeowners associations, and community special interest groups for their input. 3. The final step would include meeting with Council and School Board to determine the right time to present a Bond Question before the final approach. Francis Helmer 1. Small parks of 3-5 acres to include: ball diamonds, tot lot, skating rink, picnic area and possibly a tennis court. 2. Trailways throughout community. 3. Public access on all lakes in community. 4. Lighted ball fields at Round Lake. 5. Second beach at another lake in community. Mary Upton 1. Determine position of Council. If they are interested in a new issue how well should it be developed - ie only an outline, or fully developed with costs. 2. New Bond Issue referendum possibly in the Spring of 1976 to include four separate issues. They are as follows: I. Neighborhood Playgrounds $500,000 Neighborhood Acres Acquisition Development A. Edenvalo 10 $50.000 $40.000 B. Prairie View - - $60.000 C. Lochanburn 10 $15.000 $50.000 D. Hidden Ponds (Not enough residents now, close to Prairie View) E. Edenvale Inquire about land for school park site $50.000 F. Forest Hills - - $30.000 G. Topview 2-z $30.000 neighbors seem willing to develop H. Red Rock Center +8/15 $60.000 $50.000 I. City Hall 10 $40.000 $12.000 552 $200.000 $300.000 MEMO TO: Mayor and Members of The City Council FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Community Services hi.J. TIERU: Roger tTlstad, City Manager SUBJECT: Consider.:Lion of Purchase Agreement for George Howl; Property and Option Agreement for Bren Property at Bryant Lake • DATE: January 9, 1976 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Last May the communication was brought to the Council indicating that these parcels were for sale. The Council directed the staff to secure an appraisal for the property and to communicate with appropriate funding agencies as to the availability of monies to assist in the acquisition of these lands. APPRAISALS Appraisal reports have been prepared by an indepentent real estate appraiser and the value for the properties is as follows: Parcel No. Owner Value 7 Horak $116,000 8 Bren $223,000 • FUNDING Eden Prairie received Federal LAWCON and State Natural Resources Funding to pay for 1.00°% of the acquisition of parcels 1-6 at Bryant Lake. These funds were secured in fiscal years 1972 and 1973. The land owned by the Holasek's (Alvin and Ward) was acquired. This constitued parcels 2-6 in the original park boundary. Parcel 1 is owned by Tony Bernardi and we have negotiated with him and are unable to come up with anything close to an agreement (bin asking price is 3-4 times as high as our appraisal value). As reported in May he has expressed a desire to dedicate part of the land to the City at the time of development (we presently have no idea what his development concept night entail). The money allocated to parcel 1 out of the 1972 and 1973 grants has been transferred to parcel 7 at our request. The preliminary estimate of cost for the Bernardi Parcel is $120,000 , and the appraised value for parcel 7 is $116,000. The Federal Bureau of Outdoor Recreation and State Planning Agency have approved this transfer of funding and we are cleared to expend the money for the acquisition of the Horak Property. -2- We made application in the preliminary 1976 LAWCON Grant for funds tdassist in the acquisition of Parcel 8, the Bren parcel. Funding was not approved because Bryant Lake is included in the Regional Recreation Open Space Plan of the Metropolitan Council. Thus, the State Planning Agency felt that metropolitan financing sources ought to be used. The Five-Year Capital Improvement Program of the Metropolitan Parks and Open Spt,ce Commission includes funds in year 2 (1977) of the program for a grant to Eden Prairie in the amount of $225,000 to acquire this property. Legis- lative approval for the Metropolitan Capital Improvement Program will be required before the money is available and another item on the agenda speaks more fully to this point, THE AGREEMENTS Consistent with the funding schedule as outlined above, we have secured agreements with the landowner pending approval by the Council. In the case of the Horak Property we have developed a purchase agreement calling for the acquisition of this property by March 31, 1976 for $116,000. In the case of the Bren Property, we have secured for your consideration option agreements setting forth a value of$223.000 purchase price with the date of closing on or before October 1, 1977. The earnest money required to secure these options if a total of $2500. In both cases, we are suggesting that occupancy be granted until May 1, 1978. There are two houses included on the Bren Parcels, and the residents of the houses would be entitled to relocation assistance provided under the uniform leal Property Acquisition and Ralocation Assistance Law. No residences exist on Horak Property. However, they do use it for agriculture purposes and we are suggesting that he be granted the right to use it'for that purpose through May 1, 1978. On the Horak Purchase Agreement there is a written in clause where he requests the right to move the irrigation pump and motor from the property. I have advised the real estate agent and Mr. Horak that the'City desires to keep this equip- ment on the site as it rney be of some utility in the park development, maintance, and operations schemes. They have agreed that they will leave the irrigation pump and motor as provided under the Purchase Agreement as typed. Should you approve the Purchase Agrrement the document will be modified to reflect the cities retaining the tight to this equipment. RECOMMENDATION I would recommend that the City Council approve the Purchase Agreement for the Horak Property, and the Option Agrrements for the Bren Property as shown on the attached forms and as discussed in this memo. l --lA" �.�or ioi i'tP" • • 4. f-Ni:C 1 . ..•70.1 Yr;\.3 cet 2 ' ./'...•• • • =.'�flA�. — ./ x t1' n ` .,rcel 3 MVO?. 1 - - :'‘• . -. '. *.'^ I 1 r,•'DJ .. � ti..a I 1 a `R : \ \ (0 parcel 4 40 `` :— __:._ 1 • ti T \ B parcel 6 9 rm s • \:. . C as . \ x i ., \ o\` ; - �1 �• 9 • \+`, 1\ 0,m `\''':.,'. : ', 4" 1 �. ..,._..._ BRYANT LAKE PARK VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE . "•" - --i • 'Una • • '9Prlo1 JOREEMENt Per end in consideration of the sus of ClO Illy..AHD DOLLARS Dollars, (f 1,000.00 )to we In paid,to be applied to purchase pates,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,tile undersigned dose hereby grant unto City of Men Pr trio en Option to expire at 11159 P.N. Deptenber 101.1971 to porohese tin following described tract of lend situated in the County of • Hennepin .State of Nianesote,and described se follow. bowies (See attached plat) Open the terms and conditions net forth in the Parches*Agreement attached hereto and made•part hereof by reference. • Should cit.,or`Simon Prdris determine to*remise this Option,it shall,within the time period herein— above eat forth,signify Its intention to es exercise said Option by dopes—. Sting in the United State*Nail a notice of swab intte intention, ,s Office Pita, the undersigned in corn of Graham Land Company,at 5001 weot 00th Street,Hieneapalla,Minnesota. 55131. Pallor..to glee emir notice within the time specified shall terminate this Option and all rights thereunder without further ant or antics whatsoever,tine being the essence of this Agreement. The undersigned do hereby warrant and represent that they have good • title to said property and will be elle to furnish marketable title to said premises in accord with the terms of the attached Purchase agrssomat,which shall be signed by both parties within five days of the dote of exercise of this Option. 'sr IS WITgiffi YNLONP the sod raigned have set their hands this day of ,197. • 7s.f (2 r�. • • • • • • • • 11— . . . ••. ,.... ..., . e. o•e.0.e ,ete• -..." •".' •-.• ' ....—— . :.:ii:,.',";',;:.',7r:,(1.1,9j4).•;..,,,,: r=i-.'!".';;;::, ,..4,;e7--"",,,„ PURCHASE AGREEMENT . - 3,1100s...pol3a Nina, ....l.ala...rjr. .. . ..,197S... •, R,CIIVE,,OP i,S.ts•a.4414.Proiria. .. •. . r1,..won of • • ••.. . f S )DOLLARS ............................as esrma maul and In parr payment for the porelsaw of property sr • . .(4..)O InneL•nd:vo..l......on...licnifin...• . . inane in the County of . .;i117.V.,:...1.X. .„. .... ,Sum of ltimmon,and legally described as follows,town. I 11141...t.1,40.,..L 15.1:41 ior'uding all garden ta,11n.plow.Onolis and ores.al/own.sail,noon doom iitrAthabk vestibules,Krems,awningi.window al,J,....Win&lintlo..,Mg veno,o,blon.h).turiann I alt.traicrie rod,drapery tu1.,1,4:11ring f000ri,and imam,plumbing Maur.,hot ream tasika and 1,..Ann,elm,(with ary burneo.nolo.woken and Other iquipnwnt reed Os too:won.Mery with),write sanwet and 410,14 g,tan‘.And coutruh i d r he OmPtnY'4"0.,.`m^f•P......'",.."..........u.'th... • so,101010410 rinba.s..hr-r,primge diii•Kra.r/II.O.carol.top W110.41 1.135.1 00 condninning teatime.,if any.used and lot area on said perm..MA taltalta atO the fadlowing pool property, all ltl whial property the undersigned hai rhii dot sold to rbt burr for ate min of: .%,...aicl.`1 Td..1.17.,•.;;.J 1;'.....,;d/10-..--•-••-..-'-.'..•--•—•-.-13 P.9.9PTP°.)DOLLARS. which ihe buyer mini so pay in the following manner: Sumo money Intern paid 3 ..I s 8,7,0,0.9 .00.1,01 Or beano nnt ober II.. ..4 j. ,,,,,,,, 1mte 197/t . • . Ity contr-ct for dont teith tatorost at k;per unman postbLo ono yen.frOm • . ant.of aiwina. IteloontIon unit:tan»xill bo yroviani on reltILVed by lane. :to I.OPrVeC,Ofttn innteoevar vill bo dono to thin lona until nook tine en tido G.r..t,.ot 313 p.14 in Pull en until mot.ttsse iat moots letter of oroc.it i'..r tenola nil.noca voll be yreoenton to teller.. • ;:niimen to enjoy:n auto:.oo J.O.Ibt felli bullkliksa until AO lot,1978. This,.;:retorrsat .er ocsatimpat oe Inirais)obtninint;an at.nvoiamat to punnues• horn.;property....buttiaz Sid.,pro...sty toil..t•ortai ......U.00 in owns:not for loot mubjoot to tenroral of caller.attorney. . snen or pirhomom hoof.bar r 0 9.,011er•00m000 re*and dclna a CoI4,.'04,t t Or ... .1,400099 Med (in be',food at Oe to o.e..1 sov i.rowym onlatahl;nrk I.,ta...1 p.,.....44..h.Mandlorwanmaaatiam: • . Is,Mood,and,...erna ha,...a.lona,o,root and I cacti&wobtod.o. • lb:floo.ktecon Wee..ea vet of 00,000ener0 01 0,9 0,09,.00,0,,,,,,•'•10,190000 1,,0•0,00, I 0 Ryon...be.of ewe Noneeele or nowt,RAI.to Ow Sof/of dbneeeea. Of.Ifolree sod 01011.011a enamon a hoi.do not meoffeee•ofe promo.anerownosan. re•Riau.,or unarm w MO.,,..alio met and.im wt...r.toe0001 Thr bow Mall gm dw r,at!Walt oat.d.o de Ow'ea*/e.1 of.mr umml ramhaterai'al fil Useilmonee peoeldo*kb sod fhevetiwt.&Ike...oft.,due feel en.Mee Jot,a dw teat If li,win be .., b000med donnas Ilan.won or nornanetwad—woe Minh, S,il..,...twos dww.i.....d 491..9 01-0000'l.00000,00,0,.I,...of 0,0 00'0'09.04.0'...0.0''''''.•,,t*,0.0,P.M., • ....Ion,1 horn and..1.1ebot rpm filo premoot 00..0 11,t...0.0100 01c.00110••00.00 41.004r:ea.anal..MI eald.e.a.anon mad and looted on sad reff.too ale on oft,•ofe.oe vole,o,dr of efme. Trw wane lonho atexi to dalo ,-.11 of .10.0 WM tat ant ,1/1• .)13 prwrided Ma all tradition.el thie aleanent ann 1...w000l.e4 one.Vole.odor wee...mod elm ode.1.11 b.dood so,,,Winn 60 Mps foam*ado*heart. In Me non Om pc.awns It tikaaal 01 aletattelt,do•o,r,11 r.r.•or.,a...ro-sr hr,......damns dam.MO Woman.doll . . bmorse awl anl mid,ar,I.e yatshm-e.,orraw,ma an al.,.rata Peopoler*II lo ulaaJed la lion. •na•be,ial Ha I/tie.t.taiwal.,Aare..oat ow mu...bonfoom.,of toewooderea,mono.ma Of,seem orb ia ibr MO of Worn periwig,omen.ataille terana salt Iv nu.le..*., .•;... ,9 ,di. Th,•L,01,,0.0..00.0.0...,,,ire 100..000 0.,rcil al On.rowans,far.,an abo.wr al rid,..r•Reamenil Ira m.o.,n,,,,,,..1.dere II.wiodo,••••r,7•••41,.•ti.t11.leo...predi.and ewe end Po fond nobefowere seal firoo.Toe Nom ell......1 10 drof.weer...Mood be oeenuneown.4.../tel.:sod.bo....bow al efe,obfromaleNeolo.mid oboe..el.leo nude ea 0e0114 of.dentool fe.Fe seiwil 0•a.40.r00..“so nude ow.o in.n.II to sibeeed/.`fe deo.b.op1,,owl wit obwkouble.Pool:. . fettriln•FI of wio.Ire p.m...,broonfor...ow...Judi 14..........ex•d.lod r000 defooion of ealo xJ ILIA.10 ed.offte feels.bake MP Of.lielat.a•naln•tall 1,1010,,tenant,eine eent.„00 tate If..,.ffilioie ono ww..evaide nol o na node io•glon I..%,4.v,It,.rh.Axe 14 v..)obiteliose oboe.ea aloe.rom.l.d.dtla r,71r7.,:;:•;:,''.,::,',',74:•:,-2,..!1,'7,:;1;L°7:.`,::,.`"4",,b;1:.'Z,L;.1'.'",:::;,7i:::".,Z'".:1!;"4:1."...t7I'".`LiZU''``."4" Jet Ad io ell;te slo vuerowro...:...fv.o.to....odd.r.d 1••0.••....4•.:10•i.0d.Aro saa ni Mai cue fbe feller ''''w ''''' owl oe:totb1(111.1.0...•On rig paynwn,no......p......r,...rm..,r,,,,,be re,.......1 1,,.00 ul,,,And,...f 00100.m Man intm•ne amt. .e...woes1.••inalial,I,m,.. en.rt i...,.111.•nu mi.1,0nd re.,1•0 0.00 0 0100 n.',eq.rro.,ids,F.,a da•we*of odo4..rsa ore,..1.,,0000001,.0•0•••••00.00 000..0010 0,.9.0,0.0 4,0 r..,1.i%canal...,a.Alotrubl.end peor.4o1 wino re*web socifse • pobeowoor enoi Or...omen wl ooWn./.mond..Wel al,1.t10...a 00.101,1 • it it Manta,..,.4 acne,0101 010,.00 It 00,1e 6060,0,0 01.0*000000110 01.0009,01,•,,,9.0000 0,.0,000.04 0,0 00 00,151. 006.010 edrui 4 0 II.d 0,0004 1.41.oe eeto......ble on wwoot...1 dd.bacenowl.e•wef w fofo.d of eof000f foe dee.1.51amor mid under llo annoy of aII moan andoaxers fluff k nude at rhea..of: ... . . . . .......... ... . ...... DI e ik do toalirward.0900.0,0 140,Jure 400.40 bmahr teem. Amin,.....mi and do ran Ow-Mgr.,. I Wein mot ia pardon the mid piam.ny for On pike ma anal de tom,ehoo 1.1.1Obeereel.tral minim to 01 ww.hriarn hero'a...ma. • . 1 . . sesm ft... . . . . . • . • . . . • . . Oas" i• ib i ;A/ NA. a:CA erg•_ ) .�-we ^ ' . y • i.4t. t '/ !R/40,MAramm WPA. *A �r C,) s, h fed*,rAwM' //%„ "fit...,_.__ta21RO -. ` . --k-1;1*-C- 49 "" 'too) A 8= ' +A AA.rlo/asek : . • G.J. Horok • o . iiite7ti. • 1.51 .../.s . s" . > r • !I (4W) "..�); i John Alm : Ir. oil C.D .._9CA .. tat 944 I .nor N N ��\_ ! (;' • i LI John A.Bryn r 1 I`\ -John ABntn (u lc*or'Mc) saza / r� Garold 0.Carnes (s/04e) -- --- 1; �`� (4 ell/I Rea.... . --On M Rea..- ELMER A PETERSON County Sawyer Nsenpin Coonty.111nn. r 11 a REVISED 11-71 s /atwnt% �� 'OPTION AORSSMER= For and in consideration of the sum of FIPTs''4r1'.Utl0:L) _ DOLLARS Dollars, (31,500.00 )to us in 4.and paid, to be applied to purchase price, the receipt of which in hereby acknowledged, the undersigned does hereby grant unto City of Titan Prairie an Option to expire at 11159 P.M. September tat, 1977 to purchase the following described tract of land situated in the County of Mennanin ,State of Minnesota, and described as follows, to-watt (See attached plat) • i • Upon the terms and conditions sit forth in the Purchase Agreement attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Should City of^.den Prdrte determine to exercise this Option, it shall, within the time period herein- above set forth, signify its intention to so exercise said Option by depos- iting in the United States Mail a notice of such intention, addresseddfice dltna, the undersigned in care of Graham Land Company, at 5001 West 80th Street,Minneapolis,Minnesota, 55437. Failure to give such notice within the time specified shall terminate this Option and all rights thereunder without further act or notice whatsoever, time being the essence • of this Agreement. The undersigned do hereby warrant and represent that they have good title to said property and will be able to furnish marketable title to said premises in accord with the terms of the attached Purchase Agreement, which shall be signed by both parties within five days of the date of exercise of this Option. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have set their hands this day of1 1 T��✓C. �.iLL'+.. "''1:�4i�1e 14.�. 1Gay [tear,, N...it 1,ro lft d. 19:% ' \ win,".INnm rim)',. Iiph\I1'I V'r.IA:YctNLRe' . \-4:tN19. PIN aNr,th,-mla M.,.,...,.... ' ' PINK—Loser,lt.�etp • PURCHASE AGREEMENT • ...---._,:.ia:u^J,•yulia Mioo................_rr naury..__.... ,19 74 R ECM r1:11 OF i:)t:cif emu,L. she sum of __ ... _ (S. . .. .. ) DOLLARS as earnest money end in part payment for the purchase of property at lewd,cosar Nut.--a;.te wbkbl 6.5 c;u::. ';a uPR,Ir SA=i.R. ..,. __situated in the (minty of, . ^a: .I ,State of Minnesma,and legally described as follows,Io.wir I o;.t.c.:..ud'LA including all garden bulbs,p)anndons",.shrabn and trees,all storm sash,storm detachable vestibules,screens,awairyp w,,window shad.,blinds Imdvdiog oenaun blinds),cmrain(OAS,=averse rods,drapery rods,lighting lizwres and bulb,plumbing • hannea,h i,water tank,and heating pbni(with any burn,n,,tanks,stuktrs and other equipment used ni connection there- with),a a:er vdaeoct.used In i1ld gas rank and controls(if the properly of seller),sump pump,television antenna,insister. m,hadr.iu dishwasher.grrb.ur disposal,ovens,took top slurp and central au conditioning equipment,if any,used and leaned a,n said)a(nica and imuluding also the following personal pro finery: all of whirl)pti,tvoy rho umlersiyned has This day sold m she buyer for tlse sum of. ,=.1fi)/1.(9—-•————-- ($1 J1aw,7d.o:).)OO1r.ARS, which the buyer ages to pay in the following manner. Earnest money herein paid$ and E nlaJ7�.W._,ash,on °^.boSoca..(kh abor..,the date of dosing 'lots 1i77 ;;131,o) .:r) ny fir,:,n:ot for iioo`i with iratoront pi a mte of G,.per rearms, ir.:,..u•a:i1:.i iea'.o.11r..:et s of:34 a:�i7.Ji;ale^. inter°r,t. r.:.azt (Oc'i.Llc Ca:13 yoJr frn:l d.:tee of aleeiav s cut°Jolt and awry t•,aac t'er=ail L..id in full. :;elcc-lion c:c'IiJlt.:xw rill bee provided as raquirai lly Lev. •la i'::rnY-CUnia K:.i.tca:Ydr Will ls°das:u to the lo.r4 until auun tit* is full or usaha r•:olc till)wi i.uoaptable tutor Sat cr••,.aa for unpin t 15.1.rwa,=ill bit erre,..+.od to eoMoth. ::olla:a: is enjoy::a elt::tes 031 land:-al iniildisce until 1'.sky fats 1971. ^AIL •i:aca•n4 is u:,rKir,.7..t oa buyer obtalairk;or.a,7ron2,014 to pet�r- a'•u.c su':•.:yroporcy,::;rain;;k.'iio ;ro,crty to the r •tee. Vorb.47$in Lear.load cu1,J.:ot to.c ro¢:1 of oallursa attoraoy. Sabieer ro perinrm,nre by Mr buyer she seller sneers ro eanwse and dehwe a (::n,^:r-ct fur _._..__ .._..Warrants'[seed In,k Knurl in by spa,av,s1 any)erouenng anarkerablr title w said pavans=subject only to the ldlowina exceptions: lel Ruddong and rating ans.=dmnars,Sac and Fedotal argaasi,w. • (by k=rru,ave rtaunp in use or improvement of premises with..n edrelive fafekuse provision. I e1 keetaan m et any mineuab ad minim,rag.,se der Spam al Mirmewua. (d)Utility sod delouse .ts col rh de nn,interfere watt=merit in,p,rivernents. le)Rrehu of O 1 ll (tibia spta:rd,not subject to truancies) The bur Mall nay 11,11 nwa sera due its the year IS I i and any unpaid intelboems of werial anetoaeru payable Ibeewirb • and Mereano:eon warrants that real crate urea dot in the yr=19 I. Il be bowsaw)classification floll,partial or sour-luanearad--state which) Geller IOVV.IIIS that huddin ,it any.are enritely within the boundary lines of the prupenyand gram to serums all penal popery not nrluded hereto aril all dehns m the premesn yri n,o p.nsewion date.Sailerwas s all appliances,hearing.air raduioniay wssas11 .rd plumbing cord aid looted ern.rid prisoner are in proper waking order at date of drain.. e The seller Sunhat acme,to Jenn mr e°pe•a.mnot later than .. ' a 1' .a provided that all conditions of rhea aasnmem have hien o,nnplao w,rh Iinlns osheswiso•pearled this sale shall be dosed on or before 60 days(soon the date bawl. In Olin liens Mi.peopert,a dntn.ir•d or aebsranoially damped by nth n any,wiser stone before she rin•cnp,date,rho aammenr shell Yuman null and a..I,a.the pur.hau i i option,and an nannies p a...I hereunder shall he...howled to him. The F1 ram.dillderatinA raprnlsly•Mall that pro i,tarot allusrnepns i of 10011..iannest.inaurance and city water,and,in the awe of income Thepny Ti,,i'll ! :Min a ae-amal re limn after approval of Min aerenrent,famish an abstract of itk,or a Reentered Prtpmy • Abstract roil,,I a„)crab p..,rr u relies reveme honk narks,and State and Federal asdissa,s.and law.The barer cue be allim,J hl.' ahr r :el.o::.d lust n of snit Iini..a J due akin=•., y objection,thence,mid objections to he made is b� vela Il. meek she sell a shall In shared Ito dal soto Inch ilk ssaakarabtr,Peolien the I.,mines Ianran.iea nrynirn)r shall In Iwap red.but crane eornorioo al title and within 10 days she Wainer nacre tn� she thuyal.to p:r ,Mall[samba 1I11s a era ordinn,,r i,s tint, 1f...sal laic isr�ma n.otnah:r ant a not male�n,wid'in I:ri darsfr.m the date of waMen obpvrions therm as shore prodded.this penmen shall he nail and v sad,anti ci Ito,prinnpai atoll hr IOab'e a Arrru lea t the onion i ip.l.All dsmq herawd p.I by d.. r.I.mda it the:: id I:,amour 1w.Inu,iJ use,kri ble r be n,n de w'hi vial truce,awl uid eau/=sWk default i of s, .d:laulr 1 s reri d sal IO Jays.riun and sat a case Mr elk,u`a, 4 rests ter merest real en oi:h 1111111.1111......11 rlu pavnrnos�ode upon a all he rt tint by aid seller e e sad a t their rcywuise interest. MMe may al'Iea r:Ily.,�ill.J.Ianio m.=.Jar..r Mr=1nr.r hat.,':tI his errotno,n shall n a deprirn eirhr,Nine of she siehm of such enforcing he patina'nil I Chit i i,,'pa rl,'r,l au nt -:'nth nd a seorna,d,and provided anion to enforce such ape 6c petlms l..11 b nl i'nhu u,lo ahaa uth r. of ar mnshill rya. r Is is under . and s ml Mat rho salt made'ao 1,o rthe appeoval by the owner of said protases in waking and that the node.. m.!agent i,r t O anr.ri habit n u a p..a ar ibie en a .wn p,as this,penmen, a account me ,ease=to worm for the.anvil merry paid under Sim cresol The=heel of illoper and monks d:.dl bemsde at the=Ere el, .. _ . ._.. I,she un..1,4ar.1,carer of she abase land, we do hereby ppn a1 .. .......'.........•.......• sVlert the shore areetrarnt anal the sits dwnlq sneak. I hereby apaee to poaduse the said property for the peke and upon the teams store mentioned,Nod er aa subject w sR duio /7.yG Mein espoused. 1 e'. h. ............................................Seller._.....................:.....:._l5GAt1 • �y _.....................................:......... ..........._...._........ //' Darer SEAL) /hrA'pA dU .............................. Seller _.........................(REAL) .................................._.......... ................._..._.........:....(�Ay /Gust . I . . ' . . • •.. . .... ....— .. ..... .... . — * . 11.'1°4°1 44? .:°•!1.• 4 , ••••i i ,,,,..'4‘..!AA 4.0 1.4.4 000 w44. i..4,)41''''/ .f•'.... . . . ..• .4 A Hasse* (410) 6.J.Slack • II . . 4.9 . • s . . . . • . . . N,Arm"12.s. i • N ,• /7 -At" 1 0.1 I -i Wa . 1 , skis • c •, '''' '‘.) . cs....,.. i s i ' . _.. .."......_...."-........ 0 . C.) 1.1.1 Ogees. 0) \\' 1/ .4MA A Sewn . . I . . ' . - • . , . .....,, •... . ...4,An A.Brim Oak a smog . . , ......- . ..' . • WI futsi trrekl a Cows is ss.$) . •.40,414 Res• ‘ti, • EUAER J. 14EVER$011 • • , Canty Sinew • • , ilassegis CssathMirs. . '.• //.41 • . REVISED 11.71 • 4 • t 1 . . . i . .. • ...... . i wIt117,--toff,v6,, r Ill1N91•11' t,I A'•,.t.nIti'S,INC l.ttl-tnt9-thIntriarapt. f'INK--Ituyer.•Itreint .-.. PURCILtuSE AGREEMENT I •• .. Mit:IVO,Or . . ., . .• . r the,,III of - it tOt as Cameo inrarey and in part payment for the purchase of property at . ... • •- sinniesi it,the I . ' • Caroni cf ,, .,Siam of Minnesota,and legally descrihrd es fallooz,tomtit: • „ • • • inelitlatp an i•.I;CC!holht Ont., and 11{,,,all sham f..1411,storm cloths,ziettr i.able yes/Males s.ravns,anminct,window . ' shaecs,lettl.•the It.lin,e y.nt,tot Math r,curtain r.sis 1non,,,,'rook,dray cry',sea,Irghnnii(111111,and hulk,plumbrog halos,,hot i•!“1.1,11,.:11,1 il,.111„,j•LI1II(call an)I•.'IterS,tanks,oryki rs cod Ether,Itriprroret irsce in connection there. nith),osat.,toncth.aa,1 inlaid:,..,rank and ionic di(if rho propeny it:sil•cr),only pump,orlyyrsion antenroot,irmacr• later it th•th,csh•'.pi:tie4 er.p...al ocrns,•OA!.!!emus and frittf..1 ate Cf....1160.61g email/G..1r,if any,used and :wane tar',a:::pi:rims.in:iial,..lint.al.11the Irdlinirtg icrsorral proporty: . : all 01 a lb.',p...airty the Lindersipertd th has this day told to e buyer for Mcm soon of: whir I.the hay,ogress to pay in the foilowirrg manticr: i harm.,grahley herein pare$ : • and S : / • ' .cash,net . •'..•.' .1.!.. .i.. .',.. ,rho date of dosing. : . • • . • . . • . . .. . . • / . • I . } I , ziSiLt'eh-4_••• a 1,01-0-44,-e.1 "t-c-011L1 te fuz-frg-e------4' LAA-a1.7it14,....4 ./.(1 1 . ' Saban to pegramaare by the buret thr seller ore,to tact..and drlitef a . • '' ' .... . Wattattne Used lot la,toined to hy 3,01,.it any:onaveithe monomial.Ink nasal PM...Mbi....N..,h,folkoaing...Inf..: ' .. . 1...huildunt or...4 Nr.1,,tot,.oreirnsrooror,Nrr.re and roteral teedlattons. • Ott Itestsitt.ont',O.,tlt Inc or mtpr..atznent or erent.tc.....triwut entonnelorietture pronoun. I,,hin.,.....n..,..o..•non,r,i1,,,,,nN•twt,I I Thrs.g.•tlx•ntan.ff Mn.ortni.t. (d)Utitny.....1.1,..r..,er....n.p.d.ailth ea nir aeittete wan hatrat in.provemcart. I (fa Ott Mt..I.e.......t at.....nnt,.n.tintt tp.....ord.not s..han.r..t.r..anttrt. . . t'Alf,,,reol error.r.,...Jr.in the year PI OW 111T Itar.id ir!,11i/IIVITS 111 liteCiAl P14•55,110110 psy.Ne thcerwith and thn......t,',fr.user...that Eat 1tan rat ‘1,1,o.I!.(cat 19.. en))bc htanettead 41.11106On (foi).parnal te n...tt hontestrad—tow which) Senor...ttnstnt ch,buil.hoes.il A,art orviroiy x Alin it hound,hael Al ti.f',"•Pr,..••94 tones,f,ff09.f en Mr...a pontoons nr.t irookr.14.I Iro,.•,.A.,.!ol,&ht,,h.,:,I,',Int.,,;qr.,'..r,arraii..rtr dote.SA1,1 arr•1!111 A:lappt.anth.bourne,ail corttlitionthi.watts* 1. and plumb....!tont and 1,nel...sant tn....,"are to p...pnr,w...ktop orri,r es datnut el....n.p. •11.,tel.er intlItp.......,...&tr.:.r intan.ti.a.not Ian,411.311 . • . I...tided that all itantlitema of dad . sone...taw 1...vp kr.totap"....1 oath tIntot....hrtwite ant:told ant'ala ahaIl be.1..tril...o 111 larfore al dayt brat the doe het.. . 1..tia.e•r...tint pl.It I()11 dz ..,,)..,sub...tr.:J.111y.inna,•.•..ho nra eta',,...!!!!!0,1,1,11/It the[login,,date.this.110•1101111 shall • Imenat mill...•,1.....1,..,On•part..v..ayt....,and an now.i c.,t 1...e.tchr than In..r.m.hd ro haa a,h..,...,,t t.n..,at,ta.......ta,,,,,..0,,,pan p..a adn•tn-nnt,r.....fro",toternat,ikattraflit and any wale,,and.iI.the ease nf Moat.,pr.tn.,to...I....tn...11g tap-...tt.sl..,I In tn...1.At.If . th..11-v.,.a feat-n.d,.,r9..,t,cr+,.0,‘,1.,,I,j,+,,,..".L..,An aIntratt of rah',or a Rraiartord P. ny Ab.t,t,,,..t.••' .-,.,••....h.I.I..."tr....1.,...,......,1•.5,111,1!..ord NI,,I..!:cer.;...alarm-ma cat:ton.,Ira,lama tha n he i . iIf t...!...1.•n n•.n.........bln t a,.,o...r,....s.a“,ir.I.' i..tv,In,0.,,ka,,I....;•,en whi,rierns tturcn.a,ahone ponitled,this a.,,,,,,,••-'!••••'•...I•••.'..,'•...'',,,•P.....t.4 ,,it t..,i...!•..n-.ttna..........,......n.h•ti•r...the.pt..,! All r...ner eheretninitt . t p.n.{I-,..,,i.....,...1...,.....tr.!It rf ..r!•p,tnd t rnpor.,in I!!!•'!‘1611ii,!1•1.-•......,onni•w.tlan.aid trove.,o.i tad 1,1,1•(6111 ,I,!..!!!...;y,,..!!:.!,!,!!•!•!!!,!!!,,!!!,1„!,!!!,,,!!!!,•!!.!,/Ie.,a yeg 0.3.i'dtv..Own.at,..,Ow tat,th,se,,or n.r4',row,.r'ro.tr.rttron • 4..r...prIra ifIlr ts..I.rtnIn.tf act.,that tnar. r sprt..1.1..,ihr,..1e o rule.krherr 4.,0.4 or,r,d114y dn.owner el said pretnitat in wink,end that the under. antned swim it.-....•...at.rnr itale,,,ott.,....1,10 on an tainr.1 Om apttanntot.e‘ttin O9 9,,n,,,,arnmf.,lot thf•f'.thf-ff 0,9fIeT paid 9". I The d.l.ne'y of 4,11...,..and monies sh.di}a.m.&as thp off:,id. I . • ,'./ ,...." -‘:......4) , .,hr.....4.•.e.....•.i.nrr of thr ahn,Dc1t1,do trnhy ip,,,, BY ..," ?:4,414"0444 ff.' '..4 2(.....';•,-,/..e...—...4443eat , K I i the ann.apt...n.1.and the We thrsrhy otadc. tsp.I t(1.7hitt'n't:".i'..n'YP'Menh1117011ctith'."sidn.i.,,/‘:,..t.17..jet:I..to7.10.1'1',..ndfanaat."(s:4"1.: f 1 p herein eanrossed. I • ; Spite, (SEM I • '" • •• I DOW . Seller . . (SEAl.', . . I. •':' ...7- . ewer • . , . 41,14 • .\°\‘,C.,...1, AM RICA II,... . I •- ,) • PAM A „.. 1 *("Vitt,*i '•'' .. 'II. . 1 ., , • / , A g ,..,. \ ,./.4.-„,',Ai ao•Mho Awn WRA WI ../.•• . . t ° • A.. •• - ." :hs,tho.owo. •:....0' 0,' , 4 1_,2 s : .—.a. —• .4 A Mo/osek (430) • $wore a rl r . . , , . 6.J. Horok !. tg . ,:.) •ffil : ,.,., . • .., . i • . 4. el' . • s ''' . Mit : • • . ' . - . 3 (4$0) i • , . i C\1 `,. r JohnAlkori i I,- •'-..- , 1 . i , . .me i ___\._..-.. , $-ROO) v • 1...%,,,,, Au I-•• i ' : • . ‘.......„,...,.....,.. ,, ",..„,.............._. ,,:, (...) --._ 1.1•1 --,,.‘ 0 1S4'001 : U) • \ . . . . John A.Brim i • I .. 1' .1's. • . • :e •., , , .. / .—..-, •-., . OOO 1 aJob,,.4) , Jo 8nen/ (h,io.4-ors.'L4,; 1 ' I !e• 1 ',it i Cr. 1 / (41111 .$ Gerold G.Comet ' 7 Oa 'frke 1 ' ;,.• - ' { .,."./4 Res .•. IL i .. •.1325 76 Res••• ' ELMER S PETERSON County Sorvoyor KomispIo Cousty.hlka. • • . , . . /4,1)1 • , . — _ . REVISED 11.7) • . . • CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST January 13, 1976 CONTRACTOR (.1 & 2 Family) Michael McCalvy Co. CONTRACTOR (Multi-family & Comm.) Elder-Jones, Inc. Lyell C. Halverson • S. Klug, Inc. Midwest Store Fixture & Display Co. Richard Wiese Construction Co. HEATING & VENTILATING Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal Centraire, Inc. State Mechanical Kleve Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. PLUMBING Bowler Co., Inc. T. D. Gustafson Co. Standard Plumbing & Appliance Co. Hopkins Plumbing & Heating Co. Madsen Plumbing & Heating Katz Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. State Mechanical GAS FITTER Bowler Co., Inc State Mechanical Kleve Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. WATER SOFTNCR Rainy Water Softner & Conditioning. Commers Soft Water Co. Twin City Lindsay, Inc. These licenses have been approved by the program head responsible for,-'he licensed activity. ? /t( « �� C L ll 0:.( . )(fin-le/ Rebecca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk / 29 January 9, 1976 STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY.OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following_accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 8327 VOID CHECK (5,300.00; 2-19-75 8393 PUBLIC Ehi1LOYFLS REiIREf.L_NT Employees withheld and ASSOC. employer contributions 12-12 3,756.27 8394 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 12-12 3,756.77 8395 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION Reserve charge for November 7,722.00 8390 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 12-12 61.27 8397 OLD LOG THEATRE Theatre trip for Special Events 72.00 Park & Rec. dept. 8398 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employees withheld and ASSOC. employer contributions 12-31 4,970.51 8399 UNITED WAY Donations withheld 12-31 60.46 8400 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Taxes withheld for the month of December 4,490.87,490.87 8401 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Taxes withheld 12-31 8402 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL 7,020.04 COMM. Sewer service charge 8403 POSTMASTER Postage for utility bills 49.41 8404 PETTY CASH To reimburse petty cash drawer 48.41 8405 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA MUNICI- I PALITIES Workshop for Lowell Thone 45.00 8406 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA MUNICI- PALITIES Workshop for Ed Sherman 45.00 8407 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA MUNICI- PALITIES Workshop for Jim Zaic 8408 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA MUNICI- PALITIES Workshop for Wayne Sanders 45.00 8409 STATE OF MINNESOTA Permit-.Creek Crossing 15.00 ?-'(i 75 8410 }IENNEPIN COUNTY Taxes on Park Lane 3,174.41 i-LL-76 8411 HENRY KOPESKY Contract for deed payment 5,3 .00 B412 POSTMASTER Postage for meter 8413 LES & FRAN BLACKLOCK Payment for Park land purchase 16,670.63 0.63 1-08-76 8414 JODI ALLAR Gymnastics aide 179 10 8415 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment parts 8416 A & H WELDING .., MFG. Steel bars for equipment repairs 35.90 8417 ACRO-ADROIT, I',C. Office supplies 222.77 8418 I:ELLY BURNS Gymnastics aide 6.00 8419 BALDWIN COOI:E CO. Book-Manager 9.05 8420 THOMAS K. GRONN Test fee reimbursement 15.00 8421 FRAINCES M. BUG; Bus services-Park & Rec. dept. 39.50 8422 KATHY BORGhLAN Refund on gymnastics 8423 BANISTER SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON & ASSOC. Engr. services-Bryan Lake Sewer 4,601.97 8424 BRAUN ENGINEERING Testing-Woodland & Martin Dr. 84.50 8425 RONALD BURKHARDT Land lease for skating rink LOU 8426 TERRY BERGSTROM Land lease for skating rink 077 8427 BATTERY WAREHOUSE SERVICE Equipment parts 207.71 842E CLUTCH & U-JOINT Equipment parts 3 8429 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY 182.85 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES Football lights & supervision /G30 January 9, 1976 1-09-76 8430 CITY OF EDINA Water tests 18.00 8431 ; CROWN RUBBER STAMP Rubber stamp and desk sign 25.05 8432 HOLLY DAVIS Gymnastics aide 6.00 8433 BARBARA DANIELSON Expenses 9.00 8434 DON'S CLEANERS Shirt cleaning-Playground attendents 23.75 8435 GLEN DIX Land lease for skating rink 1.00 8436 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Service in sale & issuance bonds 4,754.18 8437 EDEN LAND CORECRU ION Land lease for skating rink 1.00 8438 EDEN PRAIRIE CONSTRUCTION land lease for skating rink 1.00 ; 8439 EDEN PRAIRIE GROCERY Supplies for Public Safety dept. 16.82 i 8440 JOHN FRANE Expenses 16.20 8441 CREDIT PUBLISHINJG CO. Subscription-Finance & Commerce 40.00 8442 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Radio repair service 46.50 8443 TAMARA GUETZKE Refund on gymnastics 1.25 8444 GRAHAM PAPER CO. Xerographic paper 205.00 8445 HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE • DISTRICT Ski lessons-Park & Rec. dept. 20.00 8446 HONEYWELL, INC. Charts for Water dept. 38.00 8447 HILLCREST SAFETY EQUIPMENT Headlight flashers 16.40 8448 HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICE Alarm-Public Safety dept. 118.00 8449 CHRISTINA HILLI1AN Refund gymnastics 1.25 8450 MARK HURD Topography 335.78 8451 HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT CORP. Land lease for skating rink 1.00 8452 JACK HACKING Expneses 16.65 8453 HOPKINS DODGE, INC. Maint. service & parts for equipment 152.50 8454 ITASCA EQUIPMENT Equipment parts 53.00 1 8455 PEGGY IRVING Refund on gymnastics 1.25 , 8456 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MCH. Office supplies 205.20 8457 DANIEL JOHNSON Gymnastics aide 16.00 8458 MARTY JESSEN December expenses 104.00 8459 CARL JULLIE December expenses 108.50 8460 KOKESH Score book & mesh bag for Park dept. 7.20 8461 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA MUNICI- PALITIES City Engineer's conference registration ' for Carl Jullie 30.00 8462 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS November & december service 2,182.80 i 8463 LEEF BROS. Rags & rugs for Water dept. 4.40 8464 MERIT PRINTING Dog registration cards 78.12 8465 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT Oxygen-Fire dept. 117.14 8465 ROBERT N. MARTZ December expenses 103.25 8!;G7 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. Basketball state registration 30.00 R'6RR TREASURER, MRPA Due for Minnesota Recreation & Park Assoc. 30.00 W.C9 30 BUSINESS PPODUC1S Copier-Public Safety dept. 87.00 84/0 MATT'S AUTO SERVICE Towing service 20.00 8471 ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS, INC. Equipment parts 26.60 8472 CHAD MEYERS Refund on gymnastics 1.25 8473 DOUGLAS MCKCWAN Refund on gymnastics 1.25 8474 MCCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOC. Engr. service-Creekwood Estates 594.00 8475 JERROLD T. MILLER Land lease for skating rink 1.00 8476 METRO PRINTING, INC. Letterhead paper 479.00 8477 MODERN TIRE CO. Tires - Public Safety dept. 395.36 8478 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN Acetylene for shop 10.77 8479 MINNEGASCO Service 1,205.47 8480 NORTHWEST EMERGENCY EQUIP. Blankets-Fire dept. 48.00 January 9; 1976 -09-76 8481 PAULA NELSON Refund on gymnastics 1.25 8482, NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. Services 1,305.92 8483 NORTHWESTERN BELL PHONE CO. Services 376.29 8484 DAVID L. OLSON December expenses 14.70 8485 CHAS. OLSON & SONS, INC. Dump body for Public Works dept. 3,782.00 8486 PARKER LIGHTING CORP. Light for fire truck 57.75 8487 DONNA PFAFF Refund gymnastics 1.25 i 8488 KIM PODPST,7.. Refund gymnastics 1.25 ` 8489 THE PRESERVE Land lease for skating rink 1.00 8490 BECKI QUERNEMOEN Expenses 8.70 8491 JAMES RICHARDSON December expenses 32.16 8492 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC. Services-Lochanburn area 1,301.33 8493 STATE TREASURER Supplies-Public Safety dept. 20.00 8494 . SOUTHWEST PLBG. Services-Round Lake Estate project was in turn billed to Consulting • Engineers 210.00 8495 DONNA STANLEY December services 87.00 8496 KILLY ST0D0LA Refund gymnastics 1.25 8497 SUSAN SICKMAN Refund gymnastics 1.25 8498 STATE OF MINNESOTA Services-Ring Route, TH169 Ring Rd-494 and Homart Signal 3,452.72 j 8499 SULLIVAN SEPTIC SERVICE, INC. Pump out manhole-billed to Hustad 80.00 8500 LORNA THOMAS December expenses 36.78 8501 SANDRA WERTS December expenses 20.64 8502 CARGILL SALT OEPT. Deicing salt 174.44 8503 METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEMENT ASSOC. Dues 10.00 �- 8504 VOID CHECK 8505 CHARLES PERISIAN Repairs to truck 45.60 8506 , APWA EOUCATION FOUNDATION Registration for Edward Sorensen in workshop 8 85.00 8507 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION January sewer service charge 13,156.90 8508 JAN GILMORE Refund on figure skating class 8.50 TOTAL 100,173.65 • • 1632