Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council - 11/12/1975
JOIN MANE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 1975 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor D. W. Osterholt, Joan Meyers, Billy Bye, Wolfgang Fenzel and Sidney Pauly COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad;City Attorney Harlan Perbix; Planner Dick Putnam; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Marty Jessen; Engineer Carl Jullie; Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL _ I. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, Page 1346 1975. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, Page 1355 I 1975. II. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Ordinance No. 309 prohibiting unreasonable acceleration and Page 1362 erratic driving of vehicles; prohibiting the leaving of key in an unattended vehicle and imposing penalty for the violation thereof. III. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from James R. Hill, Vice President of Pemtom, Inc. , Page 1364 for the Council to set a Public Hearing on the revision of the Mitchell Lake PUD. (Communication dated 1V2/75) IV. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Report of City Engineer 1. Registered Land Survey for parcels (2127) and (2129), Sec. 35, Page 1365 located east of Homeward Hills Road at Riverview Road. 2. Receive feasibility report for utilities and street improvements Page 1367 on Forest Hill Road extended east of Edenvale 6th Addition, I.C. 51-273 (continued from 10/28/75 - Resolution No. 1045) 3. Receive feasibility report for utilities and street improvements Page 1368 for Areas F and G'of The Preserve Commercial Han, I.C. 51-274 (Resolution No. 1058) _:_Council Agenda -2 - Wednesday, 11/12/75 A. Report of City Engineer (continued) 4. Change Order No. 3 for I.C. 51-260, Schooner Boulevard Page•1369 Project STR 72-9-26 I, Irving Lamppa Construction, Inc. B. Report of City Manager I. Award bids for three police vehicles. 2. Food Handling Ordinance (continued from 10/14/75) 3. Items to be discussed at Joint Meeting with Planning Commission on 11/13/75. C.Report of Finance Director 1. Clerk's License List. Page 1380 2. Payment of Claims Nos. 7989- 8069. Page 1381 V. NEW BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT. • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL_ TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1975 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor D. W. Osterholt William Bye Joan Meyers Sidney Pauly Wolfgang Fenzel COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad City Attorney Harlan Perbix City Planner Dick Putnam City Engineer Carl Juliie Finance Director John Frane Recording Secretary Joyce Provo. INVOCATION -Given by Father Tom Hunstiger, Immaculate Heart of Mary Catholic Church, Minnetonka. PLEDGE OF ALLIG IANC E ROLL CALL-All members present. Bye arrived at Council meeting at 8:35 PM. I. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1975. Pg. 1, after "ROLL CALL" insert "All members present". Pg. 2, last para.,4th line, strike "not" and insert in lieu thereof "the", and in the same line strike "when" and insert in lieu thereof "but". Pg. 3, para. 1, line 3, after "Item 1," insert "to be increased from original assessment of$971,100 to". Pg. 4, delete Pare. 5, and insert in lieu thereof "Mr. Simchuck explained that he thought the signalized intersection should be placed between Modern Tire and Energy Systems, particularly for reasons of safety." Pg. 4, Para. 6, line 1, strike "and". Pg. 4, Para. 8, 2nd line, strike "and staff". Pg. 4, Para. 9, 2nd line, strike "amended as a guideline" and insert in lieu thereof "adopted as an amendment to the Guide Plan". Pg. 4, Para. 9, lines 9 and 10, strike "Planning and Zoning Commission's" and insert in lieu thereof "western north/south local road connection between Sunnybrook Road.and east/west collector be deleted from maps, and the". Pg. 4, Para. 9, line 10, after "south" add "collector". . r3g6 Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,10/28/75 1. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETXNG HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1975. (Cont'd.) Pg. 5, Pare. 5, line 9, strike "placed on" and insert in lieu thereof "included fn the". Pg. 5, last pare. 2nd line, after "296" insert "rezoning to I-2 Park, instruct City Attorney to draft a rezoning agreement," Pg. 5, last para., 4th line, strike "road" and insert in lieu thereof "access". Pg. 6, para. 2, line 3, strike "single family homes" and insert in lieu thereof "residential". Pg. 6, para. 5, 2nd line, after "rezoning" insert "to office". Pg. 7, strike paragraphs 4, 5, 6 and 7, and insert in lieu thereof: "Mr. Mike Adams, attorney for Olympic Hills, stated that he was opposed to dedication easement at this time as it would close any chance to develop the adjacent property and said he did not think this was a reasonable request. MOTION: Bye moved to close the Public Hearing and grant development stage approval for Phase III of Olympic Hills PUD 72-11 based upon the September 8, 1975 report and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Fenzel seconded. Bye, Meyers, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", Osterholt voted "nay", motion carried. MOTION: Bye moved to approve Ordinance No. 298 rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 for the Olympic Hills Phase III 34 unit single family and double bungalow project based upon the September 8 Planning Commission recommendations and the Planning and Engineering staff reports and instruct City Attorney to draft e rezoning agreement. Penzel moved to amend the motion to delete recommendation "F", Osterholt seconded. Pauly, Penzel, Osterholt voted "aye", Bye and Meyers voted "nay", motion failed. Bye moved his previous motion approving Ordinance No. 298. Bye, Meyers, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", Osterholt voted "nay", motion carried. Pg. 7, last para., line 2, strike "requiring" and insert in lieu thereof "requesting". Pg. 7, last para., line 4, after "adopting" insert "blanket". Pg. 8, para. 1, 3rd line, after "moderate" insert "cost". Pg. 8, para. 3, line 3, strike "of" and insert in lieu thereof "to". Pg. 8, 4th pare., strike "accordingly" and insert "according to the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation of September 29, 1975, emending #2 to read: That varied building types to fit the terrain be used on the later phases of the project". isY t Council Minutes -3 - Tues.,10/28/75 I. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1975 (cont'd.) Pg. 9, para. 2, line 3, strike "Planning" and insert in lieu thereof "Services". Pg. 9, para. 5, line 2, strike "bidded" and insert in lieu thereof "bid". Pg. 10, para. 5, line 3, after "Council" insert "as recommended by the staff". Pg. 10, para. 7,,line 1, strike "a". Pg. 10, para. 7, line 2, strike "bond" an,d insert in lieu thereof "in improvement bonds". MOTION: Penzei moved to continue the October 7th unapproved Council minutes • to the November 4th Council meeting, at which time a copy of the revised unapproved minutes should be presented to the Council, Pauly seconded. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1975_ Pg. 3, para. 3, 2nd line, strike "always tries to keep his planes above the residents line", and insert in lieu thereof"flies his planes away from residents homes". Pg. 4, para. 1, 2nd line, strike "a straw vote" and insert in lieu thereof "the voters". Pg. 5, II B, 1st line, strike "Rieger" and insert in lieu thereof "Riegert", 2nd line strike "Commercial"and insert in lieu thereof "I-2 Park", and further in the same line strike "law" and insert in lieu thereof"lawn". Pg. 8, para. 8, line 5, strike "for moonlighting to patrol trail" and insert in lieu thereof "available to patrol the trail". Pg. 9, para. 3, line 2, strike "snowmobiles" and insert in lieu thereof "snowmobile trails". Pg. 10, add new para. after para. 7 to read as follows: "The City Council directed City Manager Ulstad to contact the Chamber of Commerce and request that the Chamber select a committee to review the Sign Ordinance and recommend any changes or alternatives to the City Council." MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Meyers, to approve the minutes of the October 14, 1975 Council meeting as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. Council Minutes - 4 - Tues. 10/28/75 II. PETITIONS, REQUESTS &COMMUNICATIONS A. Request by George M. Hansen Company to conduct the 1975 Audit of the City of Eden Prairie, Finance Director John Frane stated that he had contacted several C.P.A. firms to submit their proposals if they were interested in conducting the City of Eden Prairie's 1975 Audit. Frane listed in his memo dated 10/24/75 the proposals he had received, noting that the lowest estimate was not necessarily the best. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, that the City Council authorize the City to enter into a contract with the George M. Hansen Company to conduct the 1975 City Audit. Motion carried unanimously. B. Request from Dean Dresbach for a liquor license at the Eden Prairie Supper Club. City Manager Ulstad stated that he had visited with the proponent and received his purchase agreement,only to find that the agreement was not valid as the date was incorrect. Ulstad suggested that if the proponent wants to pursue this request for a liquor license, that he should submit the proper documents and that this item will be placed on the Council agenda at that time. MOTION: Penzel moved to continue this item pending a new application from Dean Dresbach for a liquor license at the Eden Prairie Supper Club, Meyers seconded. Motion carried unanimously. C. C,�ommunication from Mayor David W. Osterholt regarding letter of resignation. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Penzel, to accept the letter of resignation from Mayor David W. Osterholt with sincere regrets. Motion carded unanimously. City Manager Ulstad noted that the 2nd Council meeting in November would fall on a legal holiday and that no official action could be taken. MOTION: Penzel moved, seconded by Meyers, to establish November 12 as the official date for the 2nd Council meeting in November. Motion carried unanimously. III. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS& COMMISSIONS A. Report of City Engineer ' 1. Receive feasibility report for utilities and street improvements on Forest Hill Road extended east of F:denvale 6th Addition, I.C.51-273. MOTION: Meyers moved to continue this item to the November 12th Council meeting, Penzel seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,IO/28/75 A. Report of City Engineer (continued) 2. Change Order No. 4 for I.C. 51-264 Northeast area trunk sanitary sewer project, Barberossa & Sons, Inc.,Contractor City Engineer Jullie explained Change Order No. 4 as outlined in his memo dated October 23, 1975. MOTION: Penzel moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve Change Order No. 4 for I.C. 51-264 Northeast area trunk sanitary sewer project. Motion carried unanimously. • 3. Report on bituminous overlay for W.62nd Street (Townline Road) from County Road 4 to Woodland Road. City Manager Ulstad stated that the City had received a petition from several residents requesting this improvement end, per the Council's request, had checked with the City of Minnetonka end Hennepin County pertaining to cost sharing on this project. City Engineer explained that it appears that possibly we may get some participation from Hennepin County, but Minnetonka's City Engineer said it was unlikely that they would participate at this time, however, he would check further to see if monies were available. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to adopt Resolution No. 1049 ordering the preparation of a feasibility report on Project STR 75-3-17. Motion carded unanimously. 4. Receive petition for bituminous overlay on School Road end Eden Court Road. City Engineer Jullie explained that a petition had been received requesting this improvement stating that dust was the main problem for this request. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to adopt Resolution No. 1050 ordering preparation of a feasibility report on Project STR 75-3-18. 5. Accept streets and utilities in Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition. City Engineer Carl Jullie requested the Council accept the streets and utilities in the Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition with a one-year • maintenance bond for the utilities and a two-year bond for street construction commencing October 28, 1975. Council Minutes -6 - Tues.,10/28/75 A. Report of City Engineer (continued) 5. Accept streets and utilities in Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition (cont'd) MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, that the Council accept the streets and utilities in the Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition _ subject to the City Engineer's memo dated October 23, 1975. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, that the Council acknowledge the October 17 communication from Ecklund & Swedlund requesting seal coating for the streets in Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition in 1976, and this request be brought back before the Council at the appropriate time. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Authorize bids for street signing on the Ring Road from T.H. 169 to W. 78th Street. City Engineer stated that the quotes he has received for road signing are as follows: Donnell, Inc. $4,726.40 Lyle Signs, Inc. $5,606.03 Further Jullie explained the following quotes have been given for striping the Ring Road during fall of 1975: Clean Sweep, Inc. $ 622.00 Twin City Striping $ •869.44 The Council questioned the large number of signs involved in the • Ring Road signing. MOTION: Fenzel moved, Bye seconded, to continue this item to the November 4th Council meeting to enable the staff to provide additional information. Motion carried unanimously. B. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Recommendation of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission on regulation of gravel operators in the City of Eden Prairie. MOTION: Fenzel moved, seconded by Meyers, to direct the City Attorney to draw up appropriate questions to be asked of the Attorney General,and to bring these prepared questions before the Council at the November 4th Council meeting for their consideration and approval before submission to the Attorney General. 1361 Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,10/28/75 • B. Report of Director of Community Services 2. Consideration of purchase of Zylka property at Staring Lake. City Manager Ulstad stated that we have been unable to.reach en agreement with Mr. Zylka, therefore, we do not have anything to consider at this time. C. to ort of Planning Director 3. Comprehensive Guide Plan Consultants (Inteviews). City Manager Ulstad explained the order of appearance of the three consulting firms to be interviewed, each allowed an hour if needed: 8:00 PM - Midwest Planning - Mr. David Licht 9:00 PM - Brauer& Associates - Mr. Don Brauer 10:00 PM - BRW(Bather,Ringrose &Wolfeld) - Mr. Peter Jarvis The Council directed the following ten questions to each of the consultants being interviewed and the consultants responded accordingly: I) What do you see as Eden Prairie's major problem or problems in the next five years? 2) What problems have you solved in other communities you feel you were particularly successful in handling? 3) What problems did you feel you did not solve too well and why? 4) Which persons on your staff would you assign to this Eden Prairie project? Why would you select them for this work? 5) Would you handle genuine differences of opinions on planning proposals with the Eden Prairie staff and with the Council or Planning & Zoning Commission members or citizens? 6) Have you done work for any firms now developing in Eden Prairie? 7) Would you agree to prepare a list of current Eden Prairie clients who might be dealing with the Council? 8) What use would you make of the existing Guide Plan and its amendments? 9) How would you involve citizens in the planning process? 10) What would the finished product include? Osterholt asked if the Council could meet with other members of each of the consulting firms who would be working on this Guide Plan. All firms answered in the affirmative. i3c1 Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,10/28/75 D. Report of City Manager 1. Authorization for Public Safety Department to advertise for bids for three police vehicles. • MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to authorize the Public Safety Department to advertise for bids for three police vehicles to be received and reviewed by the Council on November 12. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Request to advertise for bids for: 1 Sweeper, 1 Chipper, and 1 Striper. Continued to November 4th Council meeting. 3. Food Handling Ordinance. • Ulstad stated the necessary changes are not complete at this time. MOTION: Penzel moved, seconded Bye, to continue this item to the December 9th Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. E. Report of Finance Director 1. Clerk's License List MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Clerk's License list dated October 28, 1975. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Payment of Claims Nos, 7903 - 7988 MOTION: Penzel moved, seconded Bye, to approve payment of Claims Nos. 7903 - 7988. Roll Call Vote: Meyers, Bye, Penzel, Pauly and Osterholt voted "aye", motion carried unanimously. IV. NEW BUSINESS A. .General discussion took place pertaining to the consultants interviewed earlier in the evening. Lee Elizer, former member of the Arden Hill's Planning Commission and presently.a resident of Eden Prairie residing at 14324 Wedgeway Court, took part in the discussion. Mr. Elizer as a member of the Planning Commission in Arden Hills had gone through a similar process in updating their Comprehensive Guide Plan, It was agreed that this discussion be continued until the November 4th Council meeting. 136 Ile:: Council Minutes -9 - Tues.,10/28/75 IV. NEW BUSINESS (continued) B. The Council discussed various ways of filling the vacancy created by the resignation of Mayor Osterholt. City Attorney Perbix stated that he would look further into the law pertaining to filling of this vacancy. This item continued to the November 4th Council meeting. C. City Manager Ulstad reminded the Council members of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities meeting to be held Thursday, October 30. D. City Manager Ulstad distributed letters to the Minnesota Congressional District to be signed by the Council members hi support of the Minnesota Valley National Recreation Area E. Ulstad reminded Council that interviews were being held on Wednesday, - - October 28, for census takers. F. Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study-Ulstad requested that this Public Hearing scheduled for November 18 be continued to a later date in order for the Planning Commission to review this study. G. Ulstad has been in touch with Mr. Andre, Administrator, Metropolitan Transit Commission, regarding the establishment of a shelter et the Intersection of 5 and Mitchell Road possibly on a gratis basis. H. Meyers directed the Human Rights Commission to do a thorough .study on providing student housing in the community. I. Meyers expressed concern regarding action on Parkview Apartments rezoning and requested that this item be placed on the November 4th Council agenda. J. Penzel discussed complaint he has received regarding the hockey rink at Prairie View School. V. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: It was moved by Bye, seconded by Penzel, that the meeting be adjourned at 1:10 PM. Motion carried unanimously. • a;= UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL . TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1975 7:30 PM, CITY HALL • COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor D. W. Osterholt William Bye Joan Meyers. Sidney Pauly • Wolfgang Penzel • COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad City Attorney Harlan Perbix Director of Community Services Marty lessen City Engineer Carl Jullie Finance Director John Frane Recording Secretary Joyce Provo INVOCATION -Given by Bill Bonner, Eden Prairie Community Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL -All members present. I. REVISED UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. OCTOBER 7, 1975. Pg. 7, para. 1, 4th line, after "the" and before "golf" insert "entire". " " " 4, 2nd line, after "dedication" insert "of the entire course as an". " 7, 2nd line, strike "Pauly" and in 3rd line insert "Pauly" after "Bye". MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Penzel, to approve the minutes of the October 7, 1975 Council meeting as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS . A. Vacation of W. 78th Street laying between Lot 12, Auditor's Subd. No. 335 (Wye Cafe site) and the Eden Prairie Center Addition. City Manager Ulstad explained that the affidavit of publication is on file and stated that the Planning Commission at their meeting of October 8, 1975 approved the vacation of this property. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 1051 vacating a portion of West 78th Street. Motion carried unanimously. • f35S Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,November 4, 1975 III. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS& COMMISSIONS A. Report of City Engineer 1. Accept bids-for street signing and striping on the Ring Road from T.H. 169 to W. 78th Street. City Engineer Janie spoke to his memo to the Council dated October 31, 1975 regarding bids for street signing and striping on the Ring Road. Tom McMahon, representing Howard, Needles, Tammen'& Bergendoff, answered questions of the Council members pertaining to signing on the Ring Road. General discussion took place as to a new name for the Ring Road. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Pauly, to instruct the staff to take the necessary procedures to change the name of the Ring Road to be officially called herewith "Schooner Boulevard". Roll Call Vote: Pauly, Penzel and Meyers voted "aye", Osterholt and Bye voted "nay". Motion carried. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, to accept the low bid of Donnell, Inc. of Savage, Minnesota in the amount of$4,726.40for street signing and the low bid from Clean Sweep of Eden Prairie in the amount of$622.00 for striping, and to direct the staff to investigate yellow striping the curb in lieu of "No Parking" signs and also to pursue the possibility of putting more than one sign on a single post. Roll Call Vote: Meyers, Penney, Pauly, Osterholt and Bye voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 2. Receive_petition requesting storm sewer study for Gonyea-SchutroP property at the Northeast corner of Co.Road 4 and State Hwy. 5. City Manager Ulstad spoke to the communication dated October 14, 1975 from T. E. Brill, Jr., Attorney, representing Dennis Gonyea, requesting a storm sewer on the above mentioned property. MOTION: Penzel moved, seconded by Bye, to adopt Resolution No. 1052 ordering preparation of a feasibility report on Project STR 75-4-20, contingent on the agreement of the applicant paying ell of the costs incurred by its preparation and to reimburse the proponent if the. project is ordered in through a Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,November 9, 1975 • A. Report of City Engineer (continued) 3. Approval of Amsden Hills Preliminary Plat City Manager Ulstad referred to the Planning Commission's unapproved minutes dated 10/28/75 whereby the Commission recommended to the Council the approval of Amsden Hills preliminary plat. At this same meeting the Commission expressed a number of concerns which City Engineer Jullie spoke to. MOTION: Fenzel moved, seconded by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 1053 granting preliminary plat approval for Amsden Hills. Motion carried unanimously. B. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Recommendation of the Parks, Recreation& Natural Resources Commission on policy and procedures for park land dedication or cash in lieu of land. Director of Community Services Jessen outlined his memos dated August 15 and October 30, 1975 as submitted to the City Council. Meyers noted in Jessen's memo of August 15 that the City will require the developers to provide mini-parks. Jessen responded that this was the consensus of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. City Attorney Perbix stated he thought the simplest way would be to get back to an acreage basis -both commercial, industrial and residential. Penzel suggested that a definite formula be submitted to the Council. Bye replied that the Council would like to be able to react to a firm, solid recommendation which the staff should initiate and recommend, end the Council could react to in one way or another. The Council requested the Parks, Recreation& Natural Resources Commission develop a formula on how credit could be applied and what they would do to protect natural resources, including a provision for trailways and mini-parks for reevaluation by the Council. 2. Recommendation of the Parks Recreation and Natural Resources Commission on rcmulation of gravel operators in the City of Eden Prairie. City Attorney Perbix discussed aspects of Mr. Jessen's memo dated October 9, 1975 to the City Council, stating he thought we could justify increased permit fees, but cannot see how we can justify up to .0S< par cubic yard mining fee. Perbix feels we should Council Minutes -4 - 'rues.,November 4, 1975 2. Recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission on regulation of gravel operators in the City of Eden Prairie (continued) strengthen Ordinance No. 142 by increasing fees, and strengthening the bond provision in terms of reclamation, but does not feel we should ask questions of Attorney General. Noted that the law in Minnesota seems to be pretty clear that we cannot charge a tonage fee. Herliev Helle stated he does not feel gravel mining operations takes much control. MOTION: Penzel moved, seconded by Pauly, to direct the City Attorney, Director of Community Services and the City Engineer • to strengthen Ordinance No. 142 by working together reviewing the provisions for reclamation, bonding and increased fees. Also to make a further recommendation on enforcement procedures to insure compliance with license provisions and cost of this enforcement in terms of man hours, contractual services and related costs. Motion carried unanimously. C.Report of City Manage 1. Discussion of procedure to follow to fill vacancy on the Cites Council. Penzel suggested that information be publicized that the City Council is seeking by November 21 a written statement from people who are desirous of being appointed to the City Council to fill the vacancy which will occur on January, and subsequent to the receipt of these applicants the Council will be making its recommendations on a preliminary basis by November 25. Pauly noted that there are some very capable people who probably would not call in and-suggested their names be submitted by a second party and then contacted to inquire if they would be interested or would accept an appointment to the Council. Pauly further explained that the Manager or a designated staff could make calls to individuals on behalf of the City Council and/or citizens suggested names. Meyers felt we should be specific in our request to the newspaper and individuals giving them the three options available: 1. 1 Year Mayor's position 2. 1 Year Councilman's position 3. 3 Year Councilman's position The Council will consider each applicant based on his or her 1 qualifications. • 2. Continued discussion on Comprehensive Guido Plan Consultants. MOTION: Bye moved to continue this item until after joint Meeting with the Planning Commission on November 13, seconded by Bye, Pauly, Penzel and Osterholt voted "aye", Meyers abstained. Motion carried. 4/8611 • Council Minutes -5 - Tues.,November 4, 1975 2. Continued discussion on Comprehensive Guide Plan Consultants (Cont'd) Osterholt responded to the request from the Council to contact Brauer& Associates to see if there would be a conflict of interest on their part. Don Brauer felt there would not be a conflict of interest as they are not requesting any variances or exceptions. Osterholt further expressed that similar problems may be existent with any of the consultants interviewed. • 3. Request to advertise for bids for: 1 Sweeper, 1 Chipper,and I Striper. Penzel requested clarification on some of the specifications as submitted to the Council. MOTION: Penzel moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue this item to the November 12th Council meeting. Mayor Osterholt relinquished the Chair to Acting_Mayor _- Meyers. 4. Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study Ulstad requested that the Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study Public Hearing previously scheduled for November 18, 1975, be rescheduled to that point in time when the Planning Commission and Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission have had a chance to review this study further. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Penzel, to continue the Public Hearing on the Purgatory Creek Open Space Corridor Study from November 18, 1975, to a date when the study has been thoroughly reviewed by.the Planning.Commission and Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Parkview Apartments - rezoning agreement changes. Meyers expressed her concern that the neighborhood park to be dedicated to the City by the proponent is of a small size. Developed areas surrounding it have their own recreational facilities internally and she would rather see that cash be received in lieu of capital improvements originally planned for this park area. The zoning agreement should so be corrected and amended prior to the 2nd reading of the Zoning Ordinance. MOTION: Meyers moved, seconded by Penzel, in addition to the 2 1/2 acres of park land dedication,that cash in lieu of capital improvements be received from Eden Development, Inc. Motion carried unanimously. Council Minutes -6 - Tues.,November 4, 1975 D.Report of Finance Director 1. Receipt of bids for two park houses. Ulstad spoke to memo submitted by Finance Director John Frans dated 10/30/75, noting that we have received a bid for the home 8t 9800 Amsden Road in the amount of$750.00, and that no bid has been received for the home at 8608 County Road 18. Ulstad further explained that there is a possibility of renting the home at 8608 County Road 18. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Osterholt, to accept the bid for$750.00 from Ernst House Movers for the home at 9800 Amsden Road, and that the City Manager report back to the Council as to an alternative use for the home at 8608 County Road 18. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Bond sale in the amount of$2,150,000.00 Robert Ehlers, Ehlers &Associates, Inc., reported that two bids had been received and tabulated - one from Piper, Jaffrey & Hopwood in the amount of$1,474.989.00, and the other in the amount of$1,454,762.50 from Bancnorthwest. Mr. Ehlers noted that the low bid from Bancnorthwest compares very favorably with communities such as Minnetonka. This bid is -3/4s undar the index. Bancnorthwest was awarded the bid. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Penzel, to adopt Resolution No. 1054 awarding the sale of$2,150,000.00 Bonds and Certificates of Indebtedness. Roll Call Vote: Bye, Penzel, Meyers, Pauly and Osterholt voted "aye", motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bye moved, seconded by Meyers, to adopt Resolution No. 1055, establishing the terms of$1,000,000.00 G.O. Water and Sewer Bonds (Series 8). Roll Call Vote: Bye, Meyers, Penzel, Pauly and Osterholt voted "aye", motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Meyers moved, Penzel seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 1056 establishing the terms of$900,000.00 G.O. Improvement Bonds, and providing for their payment. Roll Call Vote: Meyers, Penzel, Pauly, Bye and Osterholt voted "aye", motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pauly moved, Bye seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 1057 establishing the terms of$250,000.00 Certificates of Indebtedness. Roll Call Vote: Pauly, Bye, Meyers, Penzel and Osterholt voted "aye", motion carried unanimously. 3. Clerk's License List MOTION: Penzel moved, seconded by Osterholt,to approve the Clerk's License List dated November 4, 1975. Motion carried unanimously. 1340 Council Minutes -7- Tues.,November 4, 1975 1V. NEW BUSINESS 1. Pauly noted in reviewing the budget two matters should be looked into: Membership in the Minnesota League of Municipalities and the Public Nursing Fund. Bye requested to leave the meeting at 10:30 PM. 2. Perbix discussed prosecution of shop lifters and bad checks 3. General discussion regarding Edengate depositions. 4. City Manager Ulstad presented letter to Council dated 11/2/75 from James R. Hill, Pemtom, Inc., requesting a Public Hearing on the Mitchell Lake PUD. 5. Meyers requested a report on hunting in Eden Prairie be prepared for distribution to Council members. V. ADJOURNMENT. MOTION: Fenzel moved, seconded by Pauly, that the meeting be adjourned at 10:45 PM. Motion carried unanimously. • /364 • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council // PROM: Roger K. Uistad, City Manager iehYl • SUBJECT: Council Meeting Agenda for Wednesday, November 12, 1975 DATE: November 7, 1975 I. Correct, approve and file minutes of Regular Council Meetings held Tuesday, October 28, and Tuesday, November 4, 1975. A.A. The courts have asked that local governments consider adoption of an ordinance which allows conviction of a violation less than carless driving. We have enclosed a draft ordinance for your review and consideration. Mr. Hacking will be present Wednesday evening to explain and answer any questions you may have. After reviewing the draft ordinance you wish to give it a first reading, it would be Ordinance No. 309. Pemtom, Inc., is requesting the Council to set a public hearing on the ' Mitchell Lake PUD for December 2. IV.A.1 Mr. Jullie has outlined suggested procedures to accomplish the approval of the RLS request. Mr. Brown could accomplish the end result by a purchase agreement and a contract for deed, but apparently feels more comfortable with an RLS. IV.A.2 We have enclosed the feasibility report relative to extension of utilities and street improvements in the Forest Hill area. If the Council is in agreement,you may pass Resolution No. 1045 accepting the feasibility report and calling for a public hearing for December 2. IV.A.3 We have enclosed the feasibility report relative to utilities and street improvements for Areas F and G of The Preserve Commercial Plan. If the Council is in agreement, you may pass Resolution No. 1058 accepting the feasibility report and calling for a public hearing for December 2. IV.A.4 Enclosed please find Change Order 3 relative to Schooner Boulevard construction. We recommend the Council accept this Change Order, IV.B.1 Bids will be tabulated for the police vehicles and presented to the Council for your consideration and approval Tuesday evening. To: Mayor and City Council -2 - November 7, 1975 N.B.2 I would ask the Council to continue this Item as Mr. Perbix will be absent at our November 12 meeting,and further that he has not had ample time to develop recommended changes to the Food Handling Ordinance. N.B.3 I would appreciate it if the Council would suggest a couple of items they would like to discuss at the Joint Meeting of the Council and Planning Commission. I have also requested the Planning Commission to do the same. I will then prepare a formal agenda for the Council and Planning Commission to use as a guideline for their discussion session that evening. RX U:jp - • kes:sj 10-22-75 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. q()°1 AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING UNREASONABLE ACCELERATION AND ERRATIC DRIVING OF VEHICLES; PROHIBITING THE LEAVING OF KEY IN AN UNATTENDED VEHICLE AND IMPOSING PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie does ordain: Section I. DEFINI£IOUS. For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following words and lases shall have the meanings hereinafter set forth, (a) UNREASONABLE ACCELERATION means acceleration of a motor vehicle which unnecessarily breaks or interrupts traction between a tire or tires and the driving surface thereby causing a prolonged screeching sound, or the hurling of sand or gravel by the tire or tires of such vehicle, or both. (b) ERRATIC DRIVING means operating or halting any vehicle in a manner which unreasonably reduces the operators control of said vehicle or unreasonably reduces his ability to cope with potential or actual emergency situations in a safe manner, or the operation of a motor vehicle in an irregular, unconventional, or eccentric manner, or in the screeching of tires, grinding of gears, backfiring, or the production of loud explosions or noises or other noise pollution in any manner whatsoever by or with a non-emergency vehicle. Section 2, UNREASONABLE ACCELERATION AND ERRATIC DRIVING PROHIBITED. Any unreasonable acceleration or any erratic driving by the driver of any motor vehicle upon any public or private street, road, parking lot, alley, driveway or other thoroughfare within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie is hereby declared to be a Public Nuisance and is prohibited. No person shall drive or operate a motor vehicle upon any public or private street, road, parking lot, alley, driveway or other thorough- fare within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie in an erratic manner. . Section 3. Unattended Vehicles. No person shall'leave a motor vehicle unattended on any street, alley, used car lot, or unattended parking lot, without first stopping the engine, locking the ignition, removing the key and taking it with him; provided that any violation of these pro- visions shall not mitigate the offense of stealing such motor vehicle, nor shall such violation be used to affect a racovery in any civil • • action for theft of such motor vehicle, or the insurance thereon,or have any other bearing in any civil action. Section 4. Police Duties. Whenever any police officer of the City of Eden Prairie shall find any such motor vehicle standing in violation of the foregoing provisions of Section 3, such police officer shall remove therefrom the keys left therein and deliver the same to the Public Safety Office. The officer in charge may return the keys to the owner or driver of the motor vehicle upon proper proof of identity. Section 5. Penalty. Any person violating any provisions of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a Petit Misdemeanor. First read at a regular meeting of-the Council of the City of Eden Prairie this _ day of 1975, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of said City on the day of , 1975. • • David W. Osterholt Mayor for the City of Eden Prairie • ATTEST: (SEAL) City Manager • . i - Published in the Minnetonka-Eden Prairie Sun on the r,day of , 1975. • • • • • 7 • • November 2, 1975 F— Mr. Roger Ulstad City Manager 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 RE. Mitchell Lake PUD Dear Mr. Ulstad: 0 Request that the City Council at their November 4th regular meeting set the public hearing on our request for revision of the Mitchell Lake PUD to November 25, 1975. Thank you. ad Sincerely, gPEMTOM, INC. \-gskiiitft49/(j4"7 W James R. Hill, P.E. Vice President kb 11 • i 8611 g - MEMO TO: Mayor Osterholt and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, Manager • • FROM: Carl Jullie, Engineer • DATE: November. 7, 1975 w SUBJECT: Registered Land Survey for Robert Brown Property Mr. Robert Brown has submitted a request for City Council approval of a Registered Land Survey covering his property located along River View Road and east of Homart Hills Road. The proposed RLS involves a•division of existing parcels 2127 and 2129 in Sec. 35 into four tracts as shown on the attached location map. ,The owner indicates that the division is required to facilitate a sale of the property. The current zoning for Tracts A and B is rural and R1-22 for.Tract C. Tract D is the present right-of-way for Homart Hills Road and River View Road. An existing home and some outbuildings are located on Tract B. The set- backs from the existing home to the proposed lot lines are in conformance with the requirements of the "Rural" zoning district. However, Tract B contains only approximately 1.3 acres, which is in violation of the mini- mum requirement of 5 acres for the rural district. To accomodate lateral extensions for future platting of Tracts A and C, the Metropolitan interceptor sanitary sewer is located along the west side of Tract A. Municipal water service would require an extension of the City's trunk watermain south along Homart Hills Road from Co. Rd. 1. RECOMMENDATIONS • Council approval of the proposed Registered Land Survey for the Robert Brown property is recommended, subject to the following: 1. Enlarge Tract B to 5 acres in order to conform with City Ordi- nance No. 135 (future division of Tract B could be accomplished together with the future platting of Tract A or; A. Obtain a variance allowing Tract B to be less than 5 acres, or • B. Initiate a rezoning through the Planning and Zoning Com- mission from Rural to R1-22. 2. Dedication of Tract D to the City of Eden Prairie. 3. Removal of any outbuildings located on Tracts A and B which may violate the setback requirements of Ordinance No. 135 within one year following approval of this RLS. • 4. Receipt of $29 fee for processing this RLS per City Ordinance No 280. 13f b lii 7... • A C.- 0 • • -per • C�6`4.k . *- A • d O . le it tb ,* Y SS ss t 1 - 12fic1 A • SLR6L "=Sep = (pavael I2I z,) - . "--1/R AC t p . ./ . (e..cetautq) r•.4p - 7KgG7 E3 . 4061 dr 'N, . G � „k.. . , ,,,,,, ,..,... wN,?. ,_::,_:, .... !"..1...-. ‘..",-1, 1%1I rig: it i 6 0 1 PE °r9 oP©SEL7 C:' r • RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES INC November 12, 1975 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eden Prairie wntl surveyors 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 RE: SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ^'ai1ing • EXTENSION OF FOREST HILLS ROAD p°,1°" box'30 hapki°c,reboot:wta 55343 IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 51-273 • In accordance with your authorization on October 14, 1975, we 1 ,rpn present herewith additional information regarding the feasibility so11 s1sl.crtwutn of extendingForest Hills Road from Edenvale 6th Addition to hnpk.'3- I ota 55343 612 93SSfl01 Baker Road. The original report suggested that the most feasible • route would be via Theresa Place to Baker Road because of problems encountered with alternate roadway entrances all along the county road. This was not meant to imply that other alternatives were impossible. The alternates considered, in addition to the suggested route, are shown on the attached drawings. ALTERNATE 1 is a direct East-West route which follows along an existing cartway easement. As shown on the attached area map, this alignment requires the removal of a small stand of trees, a fence and part of a bituminous driveway. It also passes very close to an existing house on Lot 5 and a fairly new garage on Lot 4. There is a separation of only about 85 feet between these two ouildings. The County Highway Department will allow nucrkorr,boron Apia an entrance at this point only if the county road is re-graded 4,00.,1 to flatten out a crest located at the extension of the property smnwnl line between Lots 3 and 4. '` "°ai° mornkam Dr�:n«ra The estimated cost for this alternate, including work on Baker ,„°,t,,m,m„ Road and based on a 28 foot roadway without curb and gutter, is $59.600. Curb and gutter installed would raise the cost to about $71,000. The property owners of Lots 4 and 5 will oppose this • alternate. •IV • City of Eden Prairie November 12, 1975 Page 2 ALTERNATE 2 represents the least expensive construction cost because the sight distance at Baker Road is adequate without any re-grading. As with Alternate 1, this alignment will require removal of trees and fence and will pass fairly close to the existing houses. The distance between the two houses is approxi- mately 100 feet. Estimated costs are $53,900 without curb and gutter and $66,100 with curb and gutter. Residents on either side will oppose this alternate. ALTERNATE 3 is a somewhat less disruptive route because Lot 6 is vacant. The entrance at Baker Road lies between two crests; the one previously mentioned between Lots 3 and 4 and another opposite Lot 7. The sight distance is therefore inadequate from both directions. However, it may be possible to satisfy the County's requirements by re-grading only the most southerly crest. The estimated cost, based on this assumption, is $72,800. If curb and gutter is added, the estimated cost is $85,000. ALTERNATE 4 could also be constructed without disruption to existing residences. The crest between Lots 3 and 4 would require re-grading and the County would be reluctant to grant an entrance permit so close to the existing entrance on Theresa Place. The cost for the roadway alone is estimated at $84,300. The addition of curb and gutter would increase the cost to approximately $100,800. A summary of costs for the four alternates and the proposed original route follows: Estimated Cost With Curb Without Curb Route & Gutter & Gutter Proposed Original $ 78,900 $64,500 Alternate 1 71,000 59,600 Alternate 2 66,100 53,900 Alternate 3 85,000 72,800 Alternate 4 100,800 84,300 These costs include the costs of easements, based on a 50 foot right-of-way and $0.15 per square foot of land. Additional legal costs will also be incurred if condemnation is necessary to obtain the easements. Considering only the factors of cost and of moving traffic from west to east, Alternate No. 2 is the obvious choice of all D AL alternates. Assuming a 50 foot right-of-way, it could be aligned ! • • City of Eden Prairie November 12, 1975 Page 3 so as to provide a set back of 25 feet from the edge of right-of- way to the houses on either side. The entrance to Baker Road at this point is the only entrance possible without re-grading of Baker Road, It would also be preferred by the County over the • other three alternates. The second choice, based on the same criteria of cost and traffic flow, is Alternate No. 1. If this alternate is chosen, consideration should be given to shifting the roadway to the north and relocating the garage on Lot 4. This would allow a more reasonable set back for the house on Lot 5. • Alternates 3 and 4, while not as desirable from the standpoint of cost and traffic flow, may be more acceptable to the residents in ' the area. They would not cause as much damage to existing homesites and may even be considered as benefitting abutting ' property in terms of future development. • There appears to be no "good" way to gain access to Baker Road in • this area. The only safe entrance location (Alternate 2) will require an easement through Lot 3, the owner of which bitterly opposes any development in this neighborhood. As suggested in • the original report, unless there is strong sentiment for an immediate by-pass route, it is possible to construct only the "reduced project" at this time and delay the remainder until • future development pressures dictate final completion. The property owners on each side. Lots 12 and 13, favor that portion of the project. Very t ly yours, 404.4•"1/024--5••*".-- . . David O. Husby, P.E. • RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. • • jj 1 . • .lf j .. • -. - 7.1.9::., t e MOM' •_d no .ros, .. ..-t• Y _Tille / • fr• i in • 7 ,i v1i • r :: I :. •\ Lilltii { • . • • N 161 . mak i • . . • . ma • _ iii, ..- , . 44( L ‘i, .plli� 7 i 4�,�+ I..., ' 7 it , a . ' T ....., .9 . .,. 1 r iAp.• IFA.... • . silt . .„ 4...jillif u f tl`'SF • , a' �. r'•y 2i t41i4FI1• It�,' " y t ,, t "r, 1 • '• : y { . r ; ; , • IS ''U• V. i@�S'`1�" .'i.){$Is t'- „ f 1 .0.,•sr. \\\ 11 *, it •� )1 >J:: ). fir.t r �' .• :f .,...It �.• ... . Is/ Irk r• j,_ 1 . .... .• .s 13 it % 5 0 a «�+ 7x 5.�e� i -0 i r t . 1 J q 1 ti_.... IF' -45"" . ...:„!,,,',4 or,0 v i is 0. .3 14 • .3' •• t {Ng r Yam•, Q!' /. .,. +•1. e /a„ . t 1 'r -ice p r .40 • r "`•''M1 ?�� '. ' so J 1 is 23 2? 2i 4213 MO n sz ,- .54 V Lcr. 31 s 1y '4 v 42 4044 ~ C S ' Oy NI PROPOSED ORIGINAL .. ,j,, : me .. 7. 'i',, : :ii? ,% a : . ,A/ ; /7 " • 1 • • ° 2•• c • NONITI• < • Neux „i • — — nor .' ; :,, rig w tf 41 • ' • (NI1 • 1 • .I ! 1 1 I. 1101. ',4a44- I.1114 .. .. I." 11400• . i Ji 4. Y ../ s , A AUL •••• : . T. * .... ,--aiht, 6_ „.. .1 1. 1 'I, , , --.-fr it) • ,I. . • --) ,., . , • . i • • e� N •• • . • • NL * 'I • R, • .m. •,.^ I -' i "` ^ N. fir. Y •g• , \ . .: ,.. - ,e„,• A i MK'7 s 2 di\a; t, � t�n P' . . +,µal p d? ., I'.1".11 y� B , • 1 40. 11 + It r 1'. o" , 0" 3 3 �' + u • r, 1'S '1 • all9 Is,• .OA . 5.. 3 ; ` s O;t 1 6% i i •, '. . r� t t1 1 • Ii,�.. • ii 'F.. •••• n. I 2�.;,Lb_ y •.•• 'P0 • �fifit ' . 20 - + _ . r•:.., 1 'bd'' 30 J ,26 28 27!2/.23 24 23^22. a .VALLE'.p < c,-, i� ••1 4.� 1 31 01 1 46 q • O 1;44 a: *; 1 1 ` fALTRAT o. I _I 4FY p`uA a . ' . 1 ..,," ,• 1' 6 1. • -. - Pflefirt. - A lx"•:'....f.•1%. . ,-. . , !-?•7,, 1. -...! . 1; • 'Ill :, '.? .--.d::. . ,p• , • / -4 . 111 • 11 • I r ;. / a tow A , . —• (.. , •••• Ille : . I . ,, . t ,s2 :•,.: !.• ...1 , .. • ' i.-.toll..• .._,..,, . .. a . ...I. I. . !ID', ."1; .....V -:;." ‘ --i.-147'., . .fte el . .. , .‘."i.%.,,..7. ' - .11 I IL-or • .-..*I 3% .. , . .. • - . . . .1: "$ 1"‘,,V. A ,,, - * . „tit :' • . j - , \ ' ',. ' .a. / 4"47. ' ' . .4'....f.....• • 'Mr• ••. = • i H:t) 04. a... ail: ' . ,• •.. • i II i . • • , ,..... r • ;, • . t - 'dll Ak. * •. ' . :It(. ' i ' ' pais 1 • I ' • 4 MI& . • %I •••;', 44.1, 6,1111 . ' •t-... I ...Iit#-\l i l,;io'.tt.1,\0?ic•;.L,'I44I-4.1•"4-.t0C.s.s1741...,.i.‘Sa,r0),a,_,",-;,.:•.1...'.OW-'..2N-..,....•,‘' -•A,•''.'•'N\r i..rI..•,,,.lAt•'...4..*.,..-.1- I,-.-4,..4--,,•i4•I L.4,f,,...•f.,•.,..„ .p,•t k•• a:4t ik k'•,•..-i..,.-.•34' s.•s • l , .4.. • ,• . i ? - — •4,•4' • 2 4 ,.• ... c . . i f 4 I 4 I....k 4%, .. ,',. •. r.-. ..-•or . . • ; 7 I i . ....• . 2 I . ... . . , ..• • ' . • • 3. IV -1 k.7' i .fr, ..41. ..• 1 ' ,..,I • 4417 • ti.,,, , 4 ir %.• 1 „II,.' . ' -• :e., ' ' I I . • \\O: 1 s 4: ,1 1 , -. `. , • ••'. II,› i; % .it ' .-r•-r 1 P;ONWMPVM5:.CA>.; ' I".; ' 1$ • ' is 3. , • - as,. ,tr 4 '.'• .•, t -:.S .t 14 ,.'",} * *; . 1, ,• '. • ''''. • '• • "•• . ' t••.' , II •• ..,‘ •,I • .,00 ,'„.3,1'.;,.......:7.:,"„: „.:..-;::;"„*:.......:' , S a t • ....',1 13 ... 5 0 00 % 1 lt:ir, liv 1, . - 4,"• , • • • 14,7 11y 4-0, • — :. • — ' J , ..., $ --• 1 6 1 , 1.04.... -.:,-' '- - ;-. ` 113••• i i.. . \,7.. •''''\"" ''..: 4.ita, , , . rk, ,'. .... ' -.-.„4,0 4 3 I 4.., V•••,, —,... '. ", ., s:•.' 0.,..7., .. pg,1 ' Oili p il 141.- i ' ' 1 .;3411 .9. " " or 1-... t• .. I l.1 • 1 { • 1[4114 - ,.... ,•-,.. 14. - •, A / Anal ' • 14 • •4•• 11 4 . 14 4" 14 It' 1 " v .":"1" . 1 • • - • a• 0• ...-garirr.4 4; . , ,.. .,.. I _4 iu. _ _. _ _ . . . :I -—._ i ‘• ....,.., 4, 6404„. ) • 1/4 7... . , , 70-,.. 4 1:-;„:, ,, z.: - te . , , , .• 4:)„,. „.....• , • , _ .• . I.,•:, . ,, .,....--4, , 00 ,.. ,.. ,„. .,...„ • ,,,z. .,.. , .v : .. , e:400,4 At ; 1 . • 04.4,, 1 I e . . . L 4._••1•r1 if .44k. 30 4 1 to 211 27 1 as!ss to as 2:-. 42.VaLL/V,,,,: 46 Ern+.I 1? S .* ,.. ..................v........\ ..-41re ; $. ,7` .:: • ,....,0 1-4. ...., ____, 6, 31 ,,, . i zi ' i i :. .., co 1 1 i I0A. -iv ..,- v4/9' ALTERNATE NO. 2 1 •• •• ja‘ . - . i lt78 l',Ve: ........., --... , -......-, .. - -. . . • • - . - are.::•,... 4 1•Ts• : ..:,...v2-1: . ,..,./ 4 1 0 • lam, •,J ff • L ,•.!Mv�.. • " +..etJ_, (F •rf , Jr , 1 . 4 ..., 1 % •• , •s �Ir• 1. 41 •' s .. I •- �. .... �y- . • `. r •8 111 Aor .„ , . 4- i , i . F9: . , . ,,+ • : I • aril, f ,irg. ��••j,i • :/f •T .n "I j'/` Ili.•i.. ty_ •1 t;I•••`• 1 T I `,L-�t I x { • 2 +, • fQ • t C, \�# I� nW. 5�O� u � 0 II . 3 { .4. $ 1 a •IIr '066 .f▪ I { • !Avx I . 1 , • *04 M :i ? _ •• If ' 0 • •ia ..• e i t4 -5?„, /4 NO 11 it _O __ . _ i i ,-• ` •'' "rr,..- 30 J 29 2$ 24 i 26.23 26 23 tt +ryN9 ."I.VALLEY ilk"•• r I r r. 0/et , +Y NAj ii1J # 4W / 31 -3": 46 .'gyp , „.s. 0+Y 4; 1 ALTERNATE NO. 3 �.. _ T •ryu I - . • • ifill:.411.0 I.......1:• lrst. : t. . , ••/-. 4P , . 1. IP " f.1 ,, ,11 -4. . '•:•ii: • 1" ._ r‘... t • HooliTs. . . . Klux ,A , 1 4 rag .. : % . . . • t• ' . . g. 4,• . ..• I:,....,.. •. : i '.' . 31" ;*tl- i Z11'' (4")WIT .:•-MIL 1.441'-;•11..44. '.•.*.7:7' * .'''t."1:. . . . • . . S , ....- . , .. ' • — - .1 ' .,,.. . •--,,,t ti.".1-0 xi. "''.7 nn.- . it en ,-1444 8_ .., ,. r;• • • I :- ., • 'illi aeN,?won. is ; ' . 8 . , • tP 1 , .... • .. • , • .1 I ' 8 i .. \ "" ;' •It CI . H • It.,,, .-',',..i, • . • =1... 1.1 Ai , . .•,,,,,n1 . e • .1 . •'7'.....• ' , . "--41.- --•g,• 11040,•••- ,i '"' , :. " • ,.. 1 • mks 1 • . • 1. • • as&. .• , . 7 ,"t, )0 ... . .$ •• .. •MOW''''' • " I 4 ... 6 n , .0,.. . , l'• 78 r r .... ' II •.••• t.: ... . 408' 4 i II 4 • !, • • • ,, • „1„. - \ • ,,,,-0. ......• a ., , , • . . • • — ... ••••. . a• .. .. - ... ' • 1,14101( - '1 i "1.\-,I a Il P' , ' ., •.ria'" ' 04: t I '-•,2:-.11 i. 5 1- ...r . .• , n- • . i , 1 ' 4 1 .4,- ' ,,,. 7„„:„ ,Lic.,"... ..•''• 1,==,,,-....,- ' . . ...11 • , , 2/2 II ' . 44,4 ....... . .,*---,.. , e — .., . 'A 4'''''• ' ... i . it, ,.4 * i It.t.i . ••...I.,II.A.*''.1111 ..., ,. ...".... p •• .-4. $..... .. „, , . _i, „ i - . -ti II \1..N,. s• oil'',Id, ,, , 0. ) * — <'. .'"-- 1... v- s.. . h . • ,: q .1 1111Mi \l'es4 1111 IS 4, ti .7. i • 1 *4 ...- 1- ' , '.. ' ..,,,;,.....,-........ _.--- • • a 1 . . 0 LI IS .% 5 I ' s.. ' i- I 1 s • 4 ''''• .10% '..I 1. t -SO ' . ,431•• i !..$.je pl••l•' . .• ' ' • ''' 4••,. 1 , A * f A'.. . 4 .ei! „ ... is . ,1 .. . . ,. • li • . 1 '-` 11, ,•i,, ..it . 1 .... I. fOrt p• • , ,,,,,, .. %, ,, - f 46 .. ••• , , • it .. . . il a ''' . r7 0 ' $ .—i - '''i.' "P liflO ,. ' -•"- •....... .. . . . — -.Jul.—. ,, , ,. , wir... ,. 4 .• At•• era I ..4t III,' . / • 4.0 tip._ r , • .. po *' • 44 jib • g . , -.•pt- ,„..e , i , • . .08....0, 1 I 41.. * 1 • .. ' 4.. • gif .45 ..,. 1 , 34 4 tt•to i tilts'tt 24 23 22 4132.-Alr.4Allep -ffirr • .. SI • . 194,40, i V l • 46a, 44 4 1.%•‘ i _..{14 I * I Wp. 3 - 7i ,. . ., _ ALTERNATE NO 4_... ._z_ , -_L- ,- . , _ --..• ------..--yi-------•-•-----. -. • ..-.---,..::.1'.._,:sz--,4;=,..•----•,- --- = - --- •- .. 4-_ThERESAPLACE 2 o z ROBERT PETERSON • r.� 2• �1 MU 11 3• UIURINA REIFF r f D 4.11 • N0. CURTIS SPANOE `-1111 ' 12 4 LOt SS i�YYYrr SIT. f 13 S WILBER 43JERSVIK H } W Q j m 8 6 AREA MAP - .. - • I. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA FEASIBILITY REPORT • FOR • • SEWER, WATER AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS C • • • • • November 12, 1975 Trunk sanitary sewer and watermain, lateral sanitary sewer and watermain, storm sewer and street improvements in The Preserve Commercial Areas F and G. APPROVED: d 1 Car lie, P. City Engineer INDEX COVER INDEX CERTIFICATE FEASIBILITY REPORT SUMMARIES OF PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT SCHEDULE C PROJECT LOCATION MAPS • • - i • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR • IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 51-274 • November 12, 1975 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of ota. avid O. Husby, P.E. • •7 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL RE: I.C. 51-274 ROGER ULSTAD, CITY MANAGER I. GENERAL This report contains preliminary design, cost estimates and suggested assessment methods for public improvements requested by The Preserve. The proposed improvements are shown on the project maps in the appendix of this report and include sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain and street improvements located in the areas referred to as Preserve Commercial Areas F and G. Descriptions of each project along with suggested methods of assessment are presented in the following text. The appendix includes a summary of project costs and funding, project maps and a preliminary assessment roll showing the estimated assessment to be levied against the affected properties. • • II. SANITARY SEWER • A. Proposed Project The proposed sanitary sewer is shown on both Figures 1 and 2 in the appendix. The system shown on Figure 1 consists of 8", 10" and 12" • • diameter pipe serving only areas F and G of The Preserve. Figure 2 shows • the full area which may be served by an extension of this system. It also shows a possible method of providing service to the presently unsewered • areas to the north. :9 -2- CB. Proposed Assessments If the proposed sanitary sewer was designed to serve only areas F and 6 as outlined on Figure 1, the maximum pipe size would be 10". Because the proposed system has been oversized to accaenodate the entire area shown on Figure 2, it is proposed that this larger area be assessed for the cost of oversizing. The estimated cost of the oversizing is 58,413.00 which, when spread over the entire area of approximately 109 acres, results in an assessment cost of $60.73 per acre. This assessment would be levied im- mediately but could be deferred for homesteaded properties until laterals are available. Interest would accrue on such deferments to a point not exceeding 50% of the original assessment. The maximum deferment of $1,784 would be temporarily funded from city bond funds. The portion of the proposed system which is located between the south line of Area F and the existing 12H sewer is considered as a trunk sewer since it lies entirely within city owned property. There is no lateral benefit and the entire 529,895 would be funded through the city trunk fund. The cost of the remaining system, estimated at $158,344, would be assessed against the 55.24 acres of land lying within Areas F and G at a rate of $2,866.47 per acre. III. WATERMAIN A. Proposed Project The proposed watermain includes a section of 16" trunk main along the proposed Ring Road plus 8" lateral extensions into the service area as shown on Figure 3. The trunk portion of the project is estimated at $25,985 and the cost of the lateral system is estimated at $61,656. . -3- B. Proposed Assessments The 16" trunk main is part of the original trunk system design and as such would be funded through the city trunk fund. It is proposed that the lateral system be assessed on the basis of acreage, similar to the proposed method for the lateral sewer system. The assessment area shown on Figure 3 includes all of Area F and G plus a strip of land lying north of Area G which would also benefit from the lateral system. The total area is estimated at 59.28 acres, resulting in a unit cost of $1,038.37 per acre. IV. STORM SEWER A. Proposed Project The proposed storm sewer under this project is designed to carry storm water runoff from all of Area G lying north of the proposed Ring Road plus approximately 12 acres of land lying within the drainage area just north of Area G. The sizes and location of proposed pipe plus the drainage area are shown on Figure 4 in the appendix. The storm sewer system was designed in accordance with the "rational" method to accommodate a 10 year frequency storm based on an average run—off coefficient in this area of 0.75. The proposed storm sewer will outlet into the existing Nell Lake system at the intersection of the Ring Road and Highway 169. B. Proposed Assessment The proposed storm sewer facilities are separated into two projects IC for assessment purposes. The first section consists of all sewer pipe -4- iir along the Ring Road right-of-way for which assessment policies have already been established. The cost of this portion of the project is estimated at $30,147 and, in accordance with past policy, would be spread over a total area of 190.9 acres. The resultant unit assessment is $157.92 per acre. The remaining storm sewer, referred to as the lateral system, will cost approximately $107,471. If the entire drainage area which contributes runoff to this lateral system, about 32.8 acres, is assessed, the resulting unit cost is $3,276.55 per acre. In accordance with past assessments, the storm sewer assessment could be deferred for homesteaded properties for a period not to exceed five years or until the property is rezoned, whichever happens first. Temporary funding of approximately ii $5.200 would be required from City bond funds. V. STREETS A. Proposed Project The proposed streets in this project have not been named but for the purpose of identification in this report are referred to as "F" Street, "6" Street, "East-West" Street and the Ring Road, all as shown on Figure 4 in the appendix. The design criteria and cost data for all streets except the Ring Road are based on a 9 ton capacity. and include concrete curb and gutter and a width of 46 feet. The proposed section for the Ring Road consists of a 28 foot • -5- wide, 9 inch thick bituminous roadway in accordance with a previously T. established first stage of construction. The estimated cost for street improvements does not include the cost of grading since The Preserve, in its grading plan to the City, proposes to provide all grading within Areas F and G. B. Proposed Assessments The proposed assessments for the streets in this project are based on a front footage assessment, each street being considered separately. The estimated project costs and resulting assessments are presented as follows: • • Ring Road Cost - $22,295 Assessable Footage - 1740 Lineal Feet Unit Cost - $12.81 per Lineal Foot "F" Street Cost - $48,564 Assessable Footage - 1532 Lineal Feet Unit Cost - $31.78 per Lineal Foot "G" Street Cost - $55,628 Assessable Footage - 1800 Lineal Feet Unit Cost - $30.90 per Lineal Foot East-West St. Cost - $48,185 Assessable Footage - 1360 Lineal Feet Unit Cost - $35.43 per Lineal Foot The total assessments for the Ring Road and "G" Street will be levied against The Preserve with the condition that The Preserve would receive a credit for the amount of assessment paid against future Ring Road assessments. . -6- I The cost for "F" Street will be split between The Preserve and the new • medical clinic lying just south of "F" Street. The East-West Street assessment will be split between The Preserve and the property owned by Bermel-Smaby on the north side of East-West Street. VI. PUBLIC REACTION All land owners which would be directly affected by the project and the resulting assessments have been advised of the proposal. The proposed construction and methods of assessment were explained during a meeting at City Hall. The residents of several single family units in the area have not been contacted yet since the proposed assessments for these homesteaded lots will be small and may be deferred. They • will be notified of a public hearing in accordance with the attached schedule of events. • Representatives of The Preserve and the Methodist Hospital Clinic have indicated urgent need for the project. The schedule of events reflects • their wishes, specifically with respect to the substantial completion date.• SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST AND FUNDING I.C. 51-274 SANITARY SEWER PRESERVE AREAS "F" A "0" COST ITEM AMOUNT Trunk San.Swr. Lateral San.Swr. Construction Costs $23,700 $132,200 Consultant Engr. Costs @ 12% 2,844 15,864 City Engr. Cost @ 4% 948 5,288 Administrative Costs @ 5% 1,209 6,742 Subtotal $28,701 $160,094 Capitalized Interest @ 4% 1,194 6,663 Total Project Cost $29,895 $166,757 PROJECT FUNDING Lateral Assessment 109.15 Acres @ $60.73 = $ 6,629 Lateral Assessment 55.24 Acres @ $2,866.47 = 158,344 Trunk Sewer (from Trunk Fund) = 29,895 Deferred Lateral Sewer Assessment (from Trunk Fund) 29.37 Acres @ $60.73 = 1,784 Total Funding $196,652 Temporary Funding Source: City Internal Funds Permanent Funding Source: 1976 Bond Issue • SUMMARY OF ' PROJECT COST AND FUNDING I.C. 51-274 WATERMAIN PRESERVE AREAS "F" & "G" COST ITEM AMOUNT Trunk Watermain Lateral Watermain Construction Costs 520,600 548,800 Consultant Engr. Cost @ 12% 2,472 5,856 City Engr. Costs @ 4% 824 1,952 • Administrative Costs @ 5% 1,050 2,489 Subtotal 524,946 559,097 Capitalized Interest @ 4% 1,039 2,459 Total Project Cost 525,985 561,556 PROJECT FUNDING • Lateral Assessment 59.28 Acres @ $1,038.39 = $61,556 Trunk Water (From Trunk Fund) = 25.985 Total Funding 587,541 Temporary Funding Source: City Internal Funds Permanent Funding Source: 1976 Bond Issue 1 • • IL- , SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST AND FUNDING I.C. 51-274 STORM SEWER PRESERVE AREAS "F" & "G" COST ITEM AMOUNT Ring Road Storm Swr. Lateral Stone Swr. Construction Costs $23,900 $ 85,200 Consultant Engr. Costs @ 12% 2,868 10,224 City Engr. Costs @ 4% 956 3,408 Administrative Costs @ 5% 1,219 4,345 Subtotal 528,943 $103,177 Capitalized Interest @ 4% 1,204 4,294 Total Project Cost $30,147 5107,471 • lit PROJECT FUNDING Ring Road Storm Sewer 190.90 Acres @ $157.92 ■ $ 30,147 Lateral Stone Sewer 30.91 Acres @ 3,276,55 . 101,278 Deferred Lateral Storm Sewer Assessment (from Trunk Fund) 6,193 1.89 Acres @ $3,276.55 „ Total Funding 5137,618 Temporary Funding Source: City Internal Funds Permanent Funding Source: 1976 Bond Issue s3 SUMMARY OF 111 PROJECT COST AND FUNDING I.C. 51-274 STREETS PRESERVE AREAS "F" b "G" COST ITEM AMOUNT Ring Road "F" Street "G" Street "E-W" Street Construction Costs $17,675 $38,500 $44,100 $38,200 Consultant Engr. Costs @ 12% 2,121 4,620 5,292 4,584 City Engr. Costs @ 4% 707 1,540 1,764 1,528 Administrative Costs @ 5% 901 1,964 2.249 1,948 Subtotal 21,404 46,624 53,405 46,260 Capitalized Interest @ 4% 891 1,940 2,223 1,925 Total Project Cost $22,295 $48,564 $55,628 $48,185 PROJECT FUNDING "F" Street Assessment 1532 LF @ $31.70 $ 48,564 "G" Street Assessment 1800 LF @ $30.90 55,628 "E-W" Street Assessment 1360 LF @ $35.43 48,185 Ring Road Assessment 1740 LF @ $12.81 22,295 Total Funding $174,672 Temporary Funding Source: City Internal Funds Permanent Funding Source: 1976 Bond Issue • _......,. _._... _. .. ..... . . . - , - .... • • I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 51-274 Trunk Lateral Trunk Lateral "F" '6" "E-W" Ring Ring Rd. Lateral Parcel Owner San.Swr. San.Swr, Water Water Street Street Street Road Storm Swr. Storm Swr. Total lir: Section 14 5407 Manfred A.Beckman -- *304 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- *304 5421 Manfred A.Beckman -- 219 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 219 4910 Walter Ball -- 73 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 73 4425 F. J. Pohuda -- *61 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- *819 *880 RLS Mo. 369 Don L. Reimer -- 61 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 61 Auditor's Sub. No. 335 , Lot 17 Oscar Erck -- *18 -- -- -- -- -- -- *18 -- -- Lot 19 W.G. Smith Co. -- 91 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 91 7255 John Teen -- *44 ... __ -_ ._ _. __ ._ _- *44 7217 B. E.Menke -- *35 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- *35 . 7115 Welter J. Peterson -- *47 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- *47 RLS No. 687 A Ernest Martin -- *24 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- *24 ., *33 B Thomas Midland -- *33 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- .'! C Richard J. Bosmak -- wgz __ ... .- ._ _. _. ._ *1835 *1869 0 Richard J.O'Brien -- -- -- -- -- -- -- *3539 •3605 E Berme'-Smaby -- 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 7260 John Teman -- 1032 -- -- -- -- ._ -- -- -- 1032 !, 7270 John Tenon -- 61 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 61 7149 Bermel-Smaby -- 1336 -- 4195 -- ..- 21.258 -- 1848 41,645 70,282 Preserve Commercial Area"G" . 1151&MOO Carter&Gertz,1nc.-- 73.180 -- 25,960 -- 55.628 26,927 22,295 2716 59,633 266,339 Ed. E. Hudson -- 61 -- -- -- -- -- 61 .! • 4831 Ed E.Hudson -- 65 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 65 4817 Myrtle Mitchell -- *127 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- *127 , . No. 913 . 1 James D. Roth -- *61 -- -- -- -- _- ... -- -- *61 C Anton M.Westerhaus -- *61 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- .• as No. 168 A James F. Fennelly -- 49 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 49 itPreserve Commercial Center Area F 5610.8055, • RLS No. 913 AdO Carter&Gertz, Inc. -- 74.059 -- 26,271 34,902 -- -- 135,414 .:. 8035 Harley Pufhal -- *128 -- -- -- -- -- -- ... -- *128 4850 Alan 0'Neill -- 61 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 61 4600 William W.McNabb -- 13 -- -- -- -- .. _- -- 33 5400 William W. McNabb -- *40 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- *40 4200 Harold O. Daily -- egg _. .. -. ... ._ .. .. -- .oe 2600 Eugene F. Foss -- *91 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- *91 RLS No. 210 A Thomas Wohnoutka -- 6 -. .. _. ._ .. -. ... .. 6 W. E. Anderson -- *134 -- -- -- -- -. -- -- -- *134 • RLS No. 275 A Richard Wohnoutka -- *30 -- -- -- -- _. .. -- -- w30 s J. V. Gleason -- •30 -- -- -- -- .. -- -- -- *30 C Sanders Blacktop -- 109 -- -- -- -- .. ... -- -- 109 3200 Thomas Wohnoutka -- *97 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- .. *97 7450 George J. Karsko -- *112 -- -- -- -- .... -- -- -- *112 7405 Charles Olesener -- *54 -- -- -- -- ... ... -. ... *54 RLS No. 1394 -. Methodist Hospital -- 14.463 -- 5,130 13,662 -- .. .... .- -- 33,255 ., Section 23 i ',. 7515 Everett H. Nesbitt -- *85 -- -- -- -- .. -- .. .. *es City of Eden Prairie/9.895 -- 25.985 -- --- - -- -- -- -- 55.880 TOTALS 29,896 166,757 25.985 61,566 48,564 55,628 48,185 22,295 4,746 107,471 571,082 *Deferred (Homesteaded) .. . . ... .s.. t7 - -.:-.:, -.---'.--.......;."."'-•= 1,!;:---'11,;.-,,..---- 7- - ., • . _ .... . „ .. . - , . ,. • • 11, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING • IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 51-274 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: • The Eden Prairie City Council will meet at the City Hall, 8950 Eden Prairie Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday. December 2, 1975 to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted byMinnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Construction of sanitary sewer and watermain, both trunk and lateral, • storm sewers and streets within the areas referred to as The Preserve Commercial Areas F and G, including the extension of the Ring Road northwesterly from U.S. Highway 169-212. The Total Estimated Cost of the Project is $571,082. AM- The area proposed to be assessed for these improvements is as follows: That portion of the S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of Section 14, Township 116, Range 22 lying between U.S. Highway 169- 212 and the proposed Ring Road; the SW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 116, Range 22; the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 116, Range 22; Parcel 7515 in the NW corner of Section 23, Township 116, Range 22. 11 PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE Phase Date Feasibility Report Presented to Council November 12, 197S Hold Public Hearing and Authorize Plans and Specifications December 2, 1975 Approve Plans and Specifications February 3, 1976 Receive Bids February 27, 1976 Substantial Completion of Construction September, 1976 Final Assessment Hearing September, 1976 Assessments Payable January 1, 1977 4; 4 1 • [ ..;::.7-• i Clit ..— — - / . ..11 .._ • ,,, . , ...e.. ,... : . . .. ' -.. ... fr g I -i . • C : ,, #j iit,,0,4* 411r ' I I, 4s - Mai ROAD Is.,,. --- .., I • '''''—'— ,_ • _.,......:____..., , I . __A •3 1 Is ah ittrilitrii . Nsr-EXISTING 12' lite' SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT --^POST. SANITRY SEWER • MBA - w4110° .. ...-.. .PIT2•111SED SANITARY SEWER 4 ,ASSESSAWNT DISTRICT — --- --1 . *41 4E. I 1 :' • -:iMi::i]i: :ii':.iii . 01 I ........... ......... .... .......... . ........ ...... .. . - .--•:,. ". ....- or II II - _ ._..-- _-_- •-' i .4__ - -•, -_‘4, ,,,,...1 '..,:; ,,„.N."" _.,--„,__--- .- -- .:__."-,---- ,if- 10 •.-- ' --"-- -• V' , ,_..,—"''-ital.‘ 4.4`,..-Jit,'s"I ' "'-'''',i' I.Nt, ' * :e 1: :."'' ";,.•,''',, `1,„ ,I'' ..,:l- "::.1,1- !!"' •:.7.-f... 1 ' , '' ''' '64 ,i, ' -,,,.. . e , :.-0;t11( '' lit 1 ,6'3 t t.. ..,- rtft . ...„. ', ' 'fin.,'' '',4%'''''. " ' 0 F ''1- ''`T t ‘, ' , 4 i T.i''- : ''.. '‘ \ Y'',; i"OeFr.' ' V"'',-.':7-. II?' ' 2 r. ,_ t'1'" ' A-,l' mummuminsimEmb, ,, "- "-,:'94:,i'?'d• :;'1' ;'.."'".: _f..-"--: -_•04-:?:N- psi vettf- imiiiiiiiingliab, -"44 nf - . -------- .____ -. 1", ,..., , a •4. ' k,, if' 11 ry> -101 _____.„.,.,..r.._ . ,,,L - \ , • . 1 ',0 ..,,,..• ippe, ,,s, 1 , . • ',.:A ,,•‘ _ L_______ ___. _..... _ i illirld /:. •• .... • ::::: • -'''' I I •..,,* ..::..... --t- C 1::1 i •Afti'.‹....... . . . e .1%Y...... .... ... — ,....::-....: ' -'_ .. . ... I/ , 1 41.... S. 1111111 ohl t ...:17. • if • etp417 I • sti*!."7.7: • 4 .. Allaik IIM ..: TASSoll01 • . 1,4111sViroviwi'111 se e ffrial %tr., is \\.. i .44,404,litklop 1 .1 ! ir4Vik . 1 \ I II fe UV gi.. 1 WIIIIMW" 1ppr":r0o..gt;"lgn/i 1 11 s 1 lib... 4 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREAS I \II --P-- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ' C i t ——P.- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER ,1 . 4`-'1. ,, SERVICE AREA FLOWING NORTH. ---- , - * _ FIGURE XE _ SERVICE AREA FLOWING SOUTH ''" • I i Killgarmiliiiiiiiiiirlik.,,,,:r,..4,11 '....' I .`... 1... L 4600 • . ! P 1 • ,-,.... ,• , , ( ,.. • C _ .— • _ _.___._ - - - - „------- . 1 • •-.7. 41r . •-• - , -;... .:7.- i:„ -• EXIST IS' 1 N1110 ROW 1 .4' ••., . — QS" \ • * 11111 . A _... \, , , a . •\ , I .I1o.k • --•-• - -,- I .I i l __, • I WATERIMIN NPROVEMEN 1 4 41, ill g; 4. At,, • v., . Vet Itio - 7— \ EpRomilonlviLr N ,.___.11 ,,,,,P4rligt, •1 gull I 6.- ,0 I - EMI ASSESSMENT INSTINCT ze _ tai ---,7-11_2„------\ 1 . ., , . 1.19URE 34, ,. e . .. ., •"•_;',.'—•:&4: ,:'"—— ' • • - — .H,„- ,; • 1 L' s II - r . . . . ... .. . . _ ... . •• ... . . .. . r,. ; . .."• :: .... ... .:: .. .... .::. .......,,, . :.:.- ... ..m,, 1 ., ,,• . p in• ` 49` w 1 \A .... . .I. ..... .P . 41,' „ '71 . i#-* , Jh' --_______R&NS ROAO 0kiiiiktio, • ., .11\ioEX! �.— 1.--- . . • 11-- — \41 , • STREET St •' SEWER IMPR ( gg a�{ --— EXISTING STORM SEWER . c'S _ PROPOSED STORM SEWER ` NIIIIIIIIIR: STREET IMPROVEMENTS ...,. \\\\\ STORM SEWER FIGURE S ASSESSMENT DISTRICT '''.1:.i.:ii::i':iiiiiiiirr Iiiiii: .. ::::.. :;i i; II•;i • 1 ® ao as SS t27295 19 7217 r 'J 72.0 3.07 7115 t 7270 1 tW i 3421 1 e 17 0 56:1 �*� 7149 4 I i' 3 N• 23 ,, PR -ERVE R ^ L.k" AREA 4 ig 7 A k i o....,- M . i �� � RING ROAD' l Og ma - 1 '\__i 7.30 9033 _ yC33o .PC7I CO ERCIAL 7405 1k44itiV.16% 1 ARE "F" - Al Rl3 NO 210 2A p • d FIGURE 8 STUDY AREA 2 Fe ° • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 Contractor: Irving Lamppa Construction, Inc. City Project No. STR 72-9-26, Phase I Address: 232 Valley View Road, Chaska, Minn. 55318 City Improvement Contract No. 51-260 Job Location: Ring Road - Phase I - T.H. 169 to West 78th Street • This Contract is hereby amended as follows: General Statement: Unit price quotations contained in the "Estimated Change In Cost" section of this Change Order shall be the basis of payment for labor and/or materials furnished to complete the work described herein. The actual payment will be computed by multiplying the unit price by the field measured quantity for a particular work item. I. Change Order 92, part I, item 5 provided for a snow fence along the top of the existing D. V. Anderson bank, however the cost involved was not included in the Estimated Change In Cost tables. Payment is provided for in this Change Order. II. The Preserve requested that a driveway be added between T. H. 169-212 and Franlo Road at Station 104+25 on the right. The net Contract increase for this change is approximately $480.00. • • III. D. V. Anderson requested that the 24' driveway at Ring Road Station 114+62.5 be extended 54.15' into his property, which is located southerly of the • Ring Road. Upon proceeding with the excavation for the driveway, a satur- ated sand pocket was uncovered which is discussed in the September 15, 1975 correspondence from drawn Engineering. A drain tile as described in the Braun recommendation is proposed. The net Contract increase for this change is approximately $9,467.00. IV. The Minnesota Highway Department plans, during the upgrading of T.N. 169 westerly of the Eden Prairie Center, to divert T.H. 169 traffic onto the Ring Road. A temporary right turn lane from east bound W. 78th Street to southbound Ring Road is proposed to handle the large volume expected when the Ring Road serves as the T.N. 169 detour. The net Contract increase for this change is approximately $2,450.00. • • • • /349 • • Change Order 3 (continued) . Page 2 • The following three (3) letters are hereby referred to and made a part of this Change Order: Irving Lamppa Construction Inc. to the City'of Eden Prairie dated November 4, 1974. • Braun Engineering Testing to HNTB dated September 15, 1975. • • HNTB to Irving Lamppa Construction Inc. dated May 28, 1975. The following design detail sheets are hereby referred to and made a part of this Change Order: Sheet 7 of 62 - "Planned Construction and Roadway Profile", Revised 4/3/75. Price quotations contained in the letters incorporated into this Supplement that differ from those contained' in the "Estimated Change in Cost" section are void. Also, letter price quotations not included in the "Estimated • Change in Cost" sections are void. ESTIMATED CHANGE IN COST Unit Item Unit Price Quantity Amount I. Snow Fence L.S. $990.00 " 1 $ 990.00' II. Common Excavation C.Y. .85 100 85.00" Bit. Mat. for Mixture Ton 95.00 1.3 123.50- Binder Course Mixture Ton 8.00 5 40.00' • Bit. Mix for Base Course Ton 6.50 30 195.00% Asphalt Cement Ton 95.00 0.1 9.50- Wearing Course Mixture Ton 14.00 2 28.00` • Bituminous Material for Gal. .60 • 5 3.00 Tack Coat Concrete Curb & Gutter, L.P. 4.40 -1 Design 8624 Sub-Total II + 479.60= • 7II. Driveway Excavation C.Y. 2.90 1800 5,220.00' Select Granular Borrow (CV) C.Y. 4.75 360 1710.00' Crushed Quarry Rock Bedding t.Y. 6.50 5 32.50- Break Into 15" RCP Storm L.S. 75.00 75.00 Sewer 6" PVC Drain Tile L.P. 8.75 30' 262.50'' Install Felt Paper L.S. 20.00 20.00 - • l37C�.. ' CHANGE ORDER 3 • (continued) Page 3 • Unit • Item Unit Price Quantity Amount Bit. Mat. for Mixture Ton 95.00 4.58 435.10 Binder Course Mixture Ton 8.00 15.4 123.20 Bit. Mix. for Base Course Ton 6.50 107.1 696.15 Asphalt Cement Ton 95.00 0.46 43.70 Wearing Course Mixture Ton 14.00 7.7 107.80 Bit. Material for Tack Coat Gal. 0.60 15 9.00 Concrete Curb 4 Gutter, L.F. 4.40 104' 457.60 Design 8624 Salvaged Topsoil from C.Y. 1.10 100 110.00 Stockpile. Roadside Seeding Acre 100.00 .2 20.00 Seed Mixture No. 6 Lb. 1.50• 9 13.50 Mulch Material, Type 1 Ton 75.00 0.4 30.00 Tree Cutting L.S. 100.00 100.00 Sub-Total III +9,466.05 IV. Turn Lane Excavation C.Y. 2.90 100 290.00 Wearing Course Mixture Ton 11.50 31 356.50 Binder Course Mixture Ton 8.00 19 152.00 Bit. Mix. for Base Course Ton 6.50 62 403.00 Bit. Material for Mix Ton 95.00 4.9 465.50 Bit. Material for Tack Coat Gal. 0.60 30 18.00 Salvaged Topsoil C.Y. 1.10 40 44.00 Roadside Seeding Acre 100.00 .05 5.00 • Seed Mx. F6 Lb. 1.50 ' 3.75 5.62 Warning Markers Each 28.00 4 112.00 • Bituminous Curb L.P. 3.00 200 600.00 • $2,451.62 Contract Additions $13,387.27 Contract Deduction - Net Contract Change $13,387.27 Ini ISSUED BY: HOWARDOYEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By: By: Title: '11 tx,c4.4„.• Title: • t -6 -1 Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL: By: On: 19 City Attorney Resolution No.: APPROVED BY: IRVING LAMPPA CONSTRUCTIONS INC. /27; By: - _ pi, 4 v Title: Date: /(05- • • . • • /312 • . . • ,14;),-,40.„.. - - n . f.--;,, x' . , " f•-•3 ,, ,..; t. :. L j�11N.�t1 t7I. — - t t`f'fa�. 1'1-' l�N�'T!k} � General Construction^ �.�� con t_fit. E frr�. ` i 232 VALLEY VIEW ROAD CH/5KA,Mt 55318 !".y.:(�•�_--__.. ., \Y' TELEPHONE:941-4212 November 4, 1974 .— . 11r. Carl Julilo 11r. G.mo Sherman • • City of Dien Prairie. Edon Prairie, Minnesota Doer Sirs' • In reference to the Eden Prairie Ring Road, Phase ill Project. . • 11s are requesting that change order be made for the fol)o:rinC items: 1. Relocating Catch Basin $21C • • Fsokhoo $52.00 hr. x 3 = $156.00 •' Lender $36.00 hr. x 3 = $108.00 S.F. Roller $29.00 hr. x 1 = $ 29.00 11.1xer $12.00 hr. x 2 = $ 24.00 Faro:non $20.00 hr. x 3 _ $ 60.00 lAbor ' $22.00 hr. x 3 = 6l.00 Total $443.00 II Repair Slope Inner Ring Road D-6 $32.00 hr. x 10 $320.00 S.F. Roller $29.00 hr. x 10 2n0.00 Total $610.00 III 4iow Fence On Hr. D. V. Anderson Hill Lump Sum labor & Material $990.00 - IV Water }tin Fxtenslone 2 - 6 ft. ex. oa. 12ft. x $55.00 = $660.00 I would appreciate this change order entered into the next monthly stetorront(ostimato). Thank you. • Bernie Lamppa f•-/•.“- j.....x -rrt� . Irving Lsmpp�a Cnn::t. Co.. Inc.• ) r • • • • 137,E _ • • • +" An Expansion of Soil Engineering Services,Inc. y ENGINEERING TESTING MINNEAPOLIS/ST.PAUI 6800 S.County Rd.18.P.U.Roy 35198.Mpls..Mn.55435 7612•941.5600 J s MUM P.I.hnMp 1.M IMolaSge.bet he,U,.nM., NORTHERN MINN ESOIA 3219 E.15th Avenue,Hibbing.Mn.55796 1 E18 1634669 eaua P.I.,ti..m..a,...,,., O.A.MDT MAN r I.Oir-br,h." • • September 15, 1975 ' Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff • Southdale Office Center • 6750 France Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 • Attention: Mr. David Anderson • Re: 72-200A INSPECTION • Proposed Ring Route • • Southeast of T.H. 169 • • Eden Prairie, Minnesota • Dear Mr. Anderson: • As requested, this writer made an inspection of an area at 1 approximate Sta. 114+60 on the Ring Road, also known as the driveway into the D. V. Anderson property. The purpose of the inspection was to evaluate the potential problems for • the pavement surface of this driveway which might be caused • by the sand pocket and water which was encountered when excavating for this portion of the roadway. Inspection of the side walls of the cut indicate that the upper portion of the soils are relatively impermeable, clayey till. However, approximately 2 to 5 feet below the proposed finished grade a sand pocket was encountered which was saturated. This saturated soil was soft and loose under the action of the excavating equipment and has largely been taken out in the area of the driveway. However, water • continues to seep out of the side walls in the area where • the sand extends into the embankment. Approximately 1 to 2 feet of water currently exist in the bottom of the excavation. • • • • CONS1k lWG ENGINE CRSISMIS AND MAIERALS '/37t1 • • 72-2 c oA _. Howard, Needles, Taxmen & Bergendoff -2- . 9/15/75 It appears that'this is a perched water table in this granular stratum. This would be recharged by percolation into the soil from the higher area south and west of this location. At some point in the future if this property is cut to the approximate grade of the Ring Road, this recharge would be largely eliminated. At this time and until the property is cut there would be a potential for continuing slow seepage of water into the soils below the proposed driveway. The potential for damage to the driveway is then two-fold, a saturation of the subgrade with the attendant lost of strength and excessive frost heaving because of the ready supply of water for the formation of ice lenses: If the property is cut to the grade of the Ring. Road before the driveway is put into use there would probably be little danger of damage to the pavement-surface. However, if the final grade of the property is considerably above the Ring • Road such that recharge would continue there would be some potential for damage when the driveway is put into service. The conservative approach would be to a granular fill in the abottom ofs the oexcavation up to and Ce slightly above an elevation at which a drain tile could be placed If this tdrain ltile isamore vity into i adjacente than 4feetbelow the bottom ofthe base a cohesive backfill could be used above it. However, if the drain tile is less than 4 feet below the bottom of the base granular fill should be used up to the base to avoid significant loss of strength during spripg thaw and frost heaving. . A less conservative approach would be to dewater the.excavation with a pump and place a compacted cohesive backfill. If the sand pocket has been drained and the surrounding area is cut down to street grade so that no significant amounts of water are available to saturate the compacted fill the pavement will r function similarly to the adjacent roadway which is on cohesive soils. However, if enough time (1 year±) and water are avail- able to saturate this subgrade it will loose its strength under truck traffic and would be particularly susceptible to frost damage. • • If we can be of further assistance kindly contact us at your convenience. Very truly yours, BRAUN ENGINEERING T S G, INC. Cd1'. • .C. G. Kruse, • " Vice President - Engineerin CGK:kebp cc: City of Eden Prairie rommww.�wa ttALlo..at.].,ra711.Rite. a olLedin.caw.ebur.aenceatm.iwaaynann+1,1MM -MANURING TESTING 'mNM lb.rnr.YMwbn and au* roa,p,..b..y�J any Other PbLaa sovaUlaag auCneONedl 676/ t''i;ji ' 'i iI t-. 3 ' •' t. •4 May 28, 1975 HO-WARD NCLDLEB TAMMEN 8 UCRGENQQFF LETTE I OF . 7_$t.' ,, r,:•.tr.. .r-r :o. TRAN:''AITTAL 'i t< 3404-31 TO Mr, Bernie Lapppa RE Ring Road, Phase I S perintendeut Irving Lamppa Construction, Inc 232 Valley View Road Chaska, Minnesota 55318 • air ARE FORWARDING TO YOU: • ®Estimates ❑Proposols Et Reports UPlnns ❑Prints ©Under separate cover via: Shoo drawings D Samples D SDecifications oCopy of letter 0Change order • No.OF DRAWING No. LAST DATED COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 01 5/2775 Estimated Quantities Sbeet 1 01 of 04_ _5/02/75 Typical Sections 1 - 5/06/75 Plan of 78th Street Turn Lane THESE ARE TRANSMITTED El For approval Resubmit_cupies for approval D Approved as submitted For your use Submit copies for distribution DApp.ovedas noted As requested Return corrected prints 0 Returned for catrcctions For review and comment PLEASE NOTE: Confirming our conversation of a-few days ago, you agreed to perform the work at established-hid unit prices plus relocate tlrc hydrant for $600. if we decide to simply remove Lhe hy-7irant trunk, your cost i 3bO. Please let us know rf any of this is incorrect. CC. L/lir C 4Ur/et4s v'7 (l fr • HOWARD../ EDLES.TAMMEN& BERGENDOFF t/ /y1YLCf .-✓ , Pee ��+�. r-Ado on �Y w nrr ,•v t3% .,--.F- ---•- _% c, "... ,.... ti Ls...,, • /4-4/ "-•_.1 5-02-75 "7404- . • IChec le, 'Y Dan! Steel No 14 YI 0WAD NEEDLCU TAMMEN a fiERGENOOFF —0/of 04 '' 1/V. /p, 7" 5 rA'-'Fl-I tl.,-(--Avii,i ,rt, - filsrz-RN .27)/7: Id,r1,1 ii2,soc-.R0A C' •. ., . . . . . . . . .• .. ,1*. • • • • • .• . . I . . . • • zi . t i //. .c‘ny, ES 78"LA/4- r Sr . ......, • 1 ff,.77,4wz„„,,,_ o$vr0 ,1. 51 - .• s,e. R.•,...<... R.,...0 . i • g 7577Y - LE__ /lc' I ' • • ,0,S :1'1: ..,.i ' :4, i . 7 . 8 80 r-77 -7F-7. -..,.....-:. ..,,,,,,...t,:2,...,.., ,.<;::: .0„,_,r. L.:i _...!— • ________--11 '• I 1 ; , 1 1 ..., ___:.:, -- .„, __ .. . I rt; • 1 I • • (..E.T.Stent‘e.4 6..11) . . . . t- v4Nat.tit.3c, MAI:KOK (1111 0114,C1) '. ; 1/ /0' YEA17: . • . . SEC.T.104N A-A .,. 0 0 ate I A,CI klos r) • . •••••' To9r-/oA, • I I I. . I• ; . . , . , . ' • • I . . . • • ' , L 2"2.341 8'Poo i'-.w ' . A 1 1 c.4,sk- , .. 1 . ' /1 P34/ Weoxi.7• I • • Co f.-14?—•• 8 r7-1414).A1 Oa j S 4.-Cri 0 ti 37 231/ 8,9st Berwreff IV 78 r4 5 7-R e-e7- . ; •CoRese" ib,z> Rr 774N, 1.4;"..E. ,T-:2 v 4---, ..,77 grTi-IRAt LANE PA van EV'7- • • •! la 1 .!!.) ... . C Ote•vi Touc. wout i IS CHC ,0 SY L SIC NO CAiLinATIONS IOR - SKI t NO 0 u 3-7 ffs rc/r 78 Rr 7-44"A/ • 1.-7.C.AVil T101-4 iktY, C )( 0. 8.5" = 3 8.2.,5-0 • • • PA -Pr . • r-- ilx 1912: 2-9-7 a 300 + 3 647 3'cYcl: M 14Y .81r I ., P341 WC .r. "7. • 5.3 r 3 " 23 68. 4-57. 4 . • ri fe_•:1 • • 9.0 0 c 10 = 2 7- 2- .2341 c, "Z. 24.4.2 I.2 . Tç Co • tp 4 7 •R = 3 2 • 2..341 We Mix 3'3 V 11,5"0 = 6,01.56 )341 gc Pis ; 4 Ne e.00 = 192.0o 23 4/ I I1liy 0 ip 6.50 = 661.00 .23 41 e.iMmrivrhi.x 9.7 y. 5.00 B to.50 • rnt K. co/17 32 O.Coo 1-- I q • • • 23 s 0 23310.20 • A 1-V C Y y / 10 .05 44(4 Y. (rr? SFEE) •MIX 4- to 75 .oc )4. 4,2 • . z 4/1 ilia.9 2 /317 • - - • - • - 4• . ki\,,,,\\\\,I .• )i.•1/,i11,..--sl it- :...-, .•;-•---„:,,._.,. . .,...• -. iQ•o'._ r I... I . , a - . - ••.! . " -) \ '-'• -z -:`,-_', `A91-; . 11 I\ n II l'irl . .5- "o "\' 1 ,"'r .1.1 -• ---- — ---,---- 1 i , 1 ) 4 1, ', 11' 1 ' y • ..' •••• • I I i1 ' - ril , 20, „‘ ,n ,,_, . . A ,. - , :., .„.....--,..., ,D_,I. - • • .. 1 ; ,1,- , !i, . t\ Alit, 1 , „,.....2_,„....------ . , •tu i, •._. I,: 11— i . 1 , 0? •3 1 r 1 0 :„1 ....___,1) , ,...I 1.,,, •,, i . , I I ., 1,,,-1----..... • o -4 I 1 s'1), ' . 11 I - 'i'' - , 2 I i_ '' ":11..., 1 LI "..I 1 . . , 1 .•-.:i..f:: 1 1..!:, •.....N -,,.. ._ Ot . 4-0-74 1 ift •• , s II-I I _ 4 -. .-...--' kl (i• •'"• —. — i • e-''‘ 1,1 k l',,7,..0 A: k 1\ - NI ti •i' t5 " '.... ' 4 1 I 0 ti ... I h it, 00 sT 0 ea in • .441 . li - I .'. . o . I x • o °+ , u... i i II • . `I. I • • I t i), ! •04. 1 tIl 1 III ,i_, .. ... • , 1--''-. —•V)V) 1,:. I -•4,, ilx,\ - 1 I 4, I " I: ,_ to• i 4 0 elf W il -- - I ' 1 1;1 1 2 I _A. • ./' 1 •• _ * I .(.., k t I 1 —— ,- ' '' I 1 P 1,1 ,, , ., .. I :1-- 1 _?1„,.,-‘- I I • I ql ''• f 1 ili ) l • 1. : .• • Il . I . • I Id 1 • • I I . i • • • I I i • - le. ...I'r,l•cc, tl_ , I .:.... •1 .... .• .,., I• 1 . • I s'\' il ..,,4' II . •- I -1;Ac-s.,cr -.'. ,--,-• I 1\, '-'1 ,_ - I. ..i . . . ...: II\ I II I I?) I 11-'.,1 I 47/ 1 ii. • ' • • i•_ _ .. _ __... • CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST November 12, 1975 • CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) • Oertel Construction Co. HEATING & VENTILATING Royalton Heating & Cooling Co. Wayzata Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. • Fredrickson Heating & Air Conditioning • GAS FITTER Fredrickson Heating & Air Conditioning These licenses have been approved by the program head responsible • for the licensed activity. • 14eAQ,Uii4tp, Re'-cca Quernemoen, Deputy Clerk November 7, 1975 STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN , The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 10-24-75 7989 KATHY HANSON Relocation & moving expense 4,926.00 7990 LES BRIDGER Buy money 50.00 _ 7991 HILDA RAGUET Easement payment-Creekwood Est. Sewer 2,500.00 r-- 7992 MINNESOTA CRIME PREVENTION Crime Watch meeting for 7 persons 38.50 7993 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. Conference registration-Werts/Jessen 80.50 11-03-75 7994 POSTMASTER Postage for newsletter 166.96 11-04-75 7995 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Employees withheld and employers ASSOC. contributions 10-31-75 3,568.03 7996 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK ....Withheld taxes -10-31-75 3,488.79 7997 THE UNITED WAY Withheld donations-10-31-75 61.27 7998 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Withheld taxes for October 5,229.77 7999 STATE OF MINNESOTA Sales tax for October 391.52 8000 STATE OF MINNESOTA Fee for Liquor ID card 5.00 8001 INSTY PRINTS Poster for adult athletics 6.25 11-05-75 8002 ROGER ULSTAD Conference expenses 88.75 • 11-07-75 8003 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC. 1976 dues for Ed Sorensen 100.00 8004 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLAN- NING OFFICIALS Book 6.00 8005 BATTERY WAREHOUSE SERVICE Equipment parts 99.64 B006 BANISTER SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON & ASSOC. Engr. services-Bryant Lake Swr 5,505.87 8007 PAUL BROWN Services-football official 136.00 8008 BLACK & VEATCH Engr. services-Bryant Lake Wtr. 10,034.68 8009 BITUMINOUS ROAOWAYS,INC. Contract-Riley Lake Rd. 3,346.89 8010 BRAUER & ASSOC. Services-San. New Testament Church 1,062.10 8011 ROBERT BERG Services-football umpire 8.00 8012 BRAUN ENGINEERING Services-Ring Route 438.60 8013 CUTLER-MAGNER CO. Quicklime for Water dept. 1,679.69 8014 CAMPBELL APPRAISAL CO. Service-T.H. 169 upgrading 1,500.00 8015 CARGILL, INC. Deicing salt 176.31 8016 DALCO Repair parts-Water dept. 8.70 8017 EGEBERG CYCLE CO. Repairs 81.42 8018 EDEN PRAIRIE STABLES Horseback riding lessons-Community Services dept. 225.00 8019 FRONTIER LUMBER Materials-Hockey P.V. School 233.94 8020 FEED-RITE CONTROLS Polyphosphate for Water Dept. 240.00 8021 JOHN FRAME October expenses 25.60 8022 GUY'S AUTO SUPPLY Equipment parts 25.13 8023 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. Repair service-Fire dept. bldg. 104.53 8024 HENNEPIN STATIONERS Office supplies-Engineering dept. 6.40 8025 HONEYWELL, INC. Maintenance agreement-Water dept. 979.00 8026 INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER 1976 dump truck 8,471.00 8027 CARL JULLIE October expenses 100.00 8028 MARTY JESSEN October expenses 119.7S 8029 KELLY SERVICES, INC. Services-Planning dept. 168.00 8030 LONG LAKE TRACTOR Equipment parts 10.40 8031 LORNA LISELL October expenses • 18.83 8032 LEEF BROS., INC. Rugs-Rags 96.85 13s1 __ November 7, 1975 11-07-75 8033 STATE OF MINNESOTA Registration plates for two 2.50 Public Safety cars 8034 MINNETONKA COMMUNITY SERVICES E. P. share of community services .00 . program 100 000 8035 MINNEAPOLIS STAR Ad for sale of houses 1P5.00 8036 LORN MANTHEY Services-football official 128.00 --- 8037 ROBERT MARTZ October expenses 69.24 75 8038 MINNEGASCO Services 8039 MCCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOC. Engr. services-Creekwood Est. Swr. 1,693.00 .11 1 8040 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. Asphalt 2 221.11 8041 NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE Employees insurance 44.66 66 8042 NORTHERN STATES POWER Services 8043 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC. Membership dues for Ed Sherman 40.00 8044 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 1976 dues for Sandra werts 1,050.00 8045 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. Tires & service 54.00 .42 8046 DAVID OLSON October expenses • 23.16 6 - 8047 PEPSI-COLA CO. Employees pop •8048 . DICK PUTNAM Expenses for the months of March, .35 Sept. and October 359 359.35 3 8049 W. G. PEARSON, INC. Rock-Public Works dept. 6 8050 PITNEY BOWES Postage meter 3 .000.34 8051 JIM RICHARDSON October expenses 85 73 8052 W. GORDON SMITH CO. Fuel 8053 STATE OF MINNESOTA Services-Ring Route, T.H. 169 Ring Rd.,263.34 and Homart signal 8054 WAYNE SANDERS Reimbursement for office supplies 112.00 8055 DONA STANLEY October services 8056 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Registration plates & title fee 3 25 PUBLIC SAFETY for new dump truck 8057 STATE OF MINNESOTA Services-Ring Route, T.H. 169 Ring Rd. and Homart signal 3,019.64.64 8058 SUN NEWSPAPERS, INC. Ads sember expenses 1OO.00 80598060 ROGER ULSTADWATERS & Chlorine-Water dept. 189.00 1 SANDYAN WT & ROGERS October expenses 22.74 8061 WERTS 16.66 8062 WORD PROCESSING CENTER ReSepir aireservices m sstructians 16.O6 8060. XEROX CORPORATION 8063 XEROX WEISSER Services & supplies 130.76 8065 PERBIX, HARVEY, SIMDNS &THORFINNSON Services 6,600.17 8066 JUNE HANSON October expenses 115.1 5 05 8067 METRO PRINTING, INC. Prospectus covers 8068 HOPKINS INSURANCE AGENCY WEoxrrkkmannss comp insurance 682.00 8069 LINDA PATTERSON TOTAL 73,431.63 i38a, _ ...