Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 07/10/1973 ' EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1973 7:30 P.M., Village Hall INVOCATION - -- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - - - ROLL CALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, Joan Meyers, John McCulloch, Wolfgang Penzel, Roger Boerger. COUNCIL STAFF: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich, Village Attorney Harlan Perbix,Clerk John Frane . AGENDA 1. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD TUNE 26, 1973 . II. PUBLIC HEARING: A. 7.30 ➢.m. Projects SAN 73-1-04 and WTR 73-2-04. Sanitary sewer and watermain lateral service to the Kings Court Additions. (Attachment) Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 731 ordering Improvement Projects SAN 73-1-04 and WTR 73-2-04, approving plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids. B. j)r30 o.m. Protects SAN 73-1-12, WTR 73-2-12, and STR 73-3-12. Sanitary sewer, waterrnain and street surfacing along Hiawatha Ave. from Scenic Heights Road to south of Hillside Drive. (Attachment) Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 732 ordering Improvement Projects SAN 73-7-12, WTR 73-2-12, and STR 73-3-12, approving plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids. C. public hearing reviewing the proposed Major Center Area Planned Unit Development (MCA-PUD), approximately 1,200 acre area located in all four quadrants of the I-494 and 212 interchange. (Attachment-continued from 6/26/73 meeting) Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 733 granting Concept Approval to the I,200 acre Major Center Area Planned Unit Development as proposed by the Major Center Area Task Force in their report dated July 2,1973. (See Exhibit A) and as amended by the Planning Commission in their minutes of July 3, 1973; and further amending the 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan. D. Request by the Gelco Corporation for Concept Ilan Approval Gelco Cora. Planned Unit Development for 30 acre site for corporate office and park use on the north edge of Anderson Lakes. (Attachment) Action: Motion approving Concept Plan Approval for Gelco Corp. P.U.D. in conformance with the recommendations of the Planning Staff Report dated July 3, 1973. .l Council Agenda -2- July 10, 1973 St. PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONT,) E. condor Corporation, request for rezoning from Rural District to I-2 Industrial Park for land west of Washington Avenue and south of Valley View Road. Action: Continue to July 24, 1973, Council Meeting. III. PETITIONS, REQUESTS &COMMUNICATIONS: A. Letter dated June 11 , 1973, from Sterling Field Association, Inc., Raymond H. Carey, President. (Attached) Action: Motion to receive and file. IV. RESOLUTIONS &ORDINANCES: A. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 21 0, an ordinance regulating license fees, permit fees and charges and amending ordinances setting fees and charges. (Attached) Action: Motion approving econd Reading of Ordinance No. 210. B. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 225,an ordinance rezoning approximately 3 .8acres from P.U.D. to O.F.C. for Edenwest Office Building. Action: Motion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No. 225. V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS. BOARDS S COMMISSIONS: A. Reports of Village Engineer: Approve Final Plat of Hi 's 2nd Addition, sin e ily residential plat 113.5)located ut Scenic Heights Roa and ea f Hiawatha Av e in Rectio 16. (Eng ring Report att ched) Action: Mot ad pting Resolution No. ving Final Plat of p's 2nd Add n. 2. Consider amendment to Proposal-Agreement with Brauer& Assoc. , Inc. for East-West Parkway Study. Consultant is requesting lump sum fee of $9,200 for completion of E-W Parkway preliminary alignment and grade study. Reasons for change are as follow: A) A fee based on percentage of the construction cost as specified under the original contract would be somewhat indeterminate because this is a study of preliminary grade and alignment only; B) The scope of services provided by the consultant should be expanded to include review by architects 6 planners. (Att.) Action: Motion approving amendment dated June 13, 1973, in the amount of $9,200 to Proposal-Agreement dated June 26, 1972, and extension thereof dated October 10, 1972, with Brauer & Assoc., Inc. for the East-West Parkway preliminary grade and alignment study. B. Report of Village Clerk: Village Clerk's Recommended License Application List dated 7/10/73. (Att.) Action: Motion approving License Application List. Council Agenda -3- July 10, 1973 V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS 6 COMMISSIONS (CONT.) C. Reports of Village Manager: 1. Amendment to the CATV joint Powers Agreement. Action: Motion deleting Section 10 of Article VI of CATV Joint Powers Agreement. 2. Establishment of Public Works Utility Division. Action: VI. FINANCES; A. Payment of Claims No. 2177 through 2260. (Attached) Action: Motion approving payment of Claims No. B. cash and Investment Report. (Attached) Action: Motion accepting Cash and nvestment Report dated July 10, 1973. VII. ADJOURNMENT. t I'iINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL TUESDAY, Ju+E 2G, 1973 7:33 P.;i. VILLAGE HALL Council Members: 'iayor Paul Redpath, Councilwoman Joan lioycra, Councilmen Uolfgang Penzel, P,oger Boerger and John :McCulloch. Council Staff: Vil lace Manager Robert P. Heinrich, Village Attorney Harlan Perbix I. i.It?UTES OF REGULAR lEETING HELL JU!'E 12, 1973. motion was made by hr. Penzel seconded by 'irs. 6leyers to approve the minutes of June 12, 1°73, as published. notion carried unani- mously. II. SALE OF $2 ,500�000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER AND ;IATER BONDS. iir. dob Ehlers explained that the bids had been opened at 7:00 P11 that eveni ng for the :p2,5C0,000 non-rated bonds. An explanation on the current bond market was made as well as on the three bids. It was Jr.r Ehler's and i-ir. Frane's recommendation that Bid Two be accepter:, A motion was made by kr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No . 725 autrioriziaq the sale of $2,500,000 General Oblieation Sewer and :Water 3onds to Juran Thody, Inc., St. Paul, at a net interest rate of 5. 3243%. rirs. ,teyers seconded. On roll call, all voted aye, except i'ir. Boerger who was not yet present. Motion carried. III.PU3LIC HEARINGS: A. Public hear inr rev ier.inr the proposed iajor Canter Area Planned Unit Development (T1C7'.-PUO), approximately 1 ,00 acre area lo- cated in all four quadrants of the I -494 and 212 interchange. :ir. Heinrich stated that the iiCA has been reviewed and discussed at hearings before and at l'crk sessions of the Plannino Commis- sion. i,:eighborhood meetinrs have also been held to explain the concept to affected residents. The ;anager then summarized the history of the task force forma- tion and the project and outlined the ;1CA and Village goals and objectives. Summary copies of the MCA Task Force Report of June 1973 were made available for anyone interested. Ir. Putnam, Village Planner, explained how the Task Force divided into committees to investigate and discuss the transportation, land use, environmental and fiscal concerns in the Major Center Area. The recommendations of each committee were highlighted and it was reported that the HCA would include not only a shopping mall but other amenities such as servic es, housing, cul tural activities and perhaps a regional library. • Council Iieeting -2- June 26, 1973 ivr. Putnam added that the report is not a plan whol eheartedly endorsed by any one group, but that the recommendations are work- able and implementable. It is anticipated that final approval for the IICA PUD as an amendment to the 1963 Guide Plan will be given Tuesday, July 10. A motion was made by i•ir. Boerger seconded by fir. ficCulloch to continue the hearing to July 10, 1973. All voted aye. Motion carried. B. Presentation of final feasibility report and preliminary hear- ing on the Ring toad Project STR T2-9-Z6. :it-. Heinrich explained that the offic ial hearing on the construc- tion of the ring route was not possible since the notice had not been published by the Sun Newspaper. However, a preliminary hearing could be held informing interested residents of the pro- posed project. iir. James iiurphy of Howard, Needles, Tammen h Bergendoff, ex- plained construction details--base, 1 ighting, drainage, road widths and lanes, boul evard and sidewalk areas. The path of the road would be as foil ows: Phase I: Northeast beginning at the intersection of County Road 39 and TH 169 and 212; south interchanging with I-494; south intersecting at grade with 73th Street; south and west inter- secting at grade with TH 169 and 212; north and west inter- secting with TH 5 at grade; then north and west to Valley View Road. Phase II: From Valley View Road north and east interchanging with I-494; east and south along the al ignment of County Road G0 and interchanging with TH 212; then south to the point of beginning --intersection of County Road 39 and TH 169 and 212. iir. iiurphy explained the economics and feasibility of the path chosen particularly of the two possible alignments between TH 169- 212 and TH 5--the toe of slope or top of slope alignments. Fur- ther, he stated that during both phases lighting, landscaping, signalization, sidewalk construction would be deferred; however, storm drainage would be provided. iir. Heinrich stated that in conversations with the District 5 Highway Department, he has received indications that things look good and that they are in support of the engineering recommenda- tions in regard to the Phase I underpass at I-494 and the con- stru ction of ramps. The decision as to whether the road will over- pass or underpass 1-494 will be made by the flinnesota Department of Highways and the Federal Highway Administration. The Financing of the Ring Route was explained by hr- Heinrich. The recommendations of the Fiscal cnmrnitt.ee of the MCA Task Force • A i Council fleeting -3- June 26, 1973 were highlighted with fir. Heinrich expounding upon the recoumended policy on financing. The net assessable cost to the Village would be about $9,150,000 with assessments not taking place until Sep- tember of 1974. He further stated that the as sessment district has not yet been determined. To assure equity to all affected. the assessment rates would be computed by combining the Base Rate iiethod, Front Foot Method and Land Use/Trip Generation flethod. The hearing was then opened to questions from the audience. In answer to a question from Iir. Terry Halton, 11401 Leona Road, fir f•iurphy said that until exact gradings and alignments are deter- mined. a statement of who is going to be affec ted cannot be ma de. i•ir. (Murphy explained to Mr. Floyd Derntsen, 12655 Valley View Road, that the ring route would be located south of the present Valley View Road and would intersect with I-494 south and east of the Valley View and I-494 bridge. A buffer zone of earth berms ar►d plantings would be provided between the ring route and Valley View the extent of which would depend on the grade between the two roads. rlr. f•4cGraw, St. Paul, representing the major property owners in the ring route area, read a letter and resolution expressing their feelings about the project. Of prime concern was the assessment policy proposed with 95% of the net cost being borne by the ben e• f ited properties . iir. Don Peterson , President of Eden Land Corporation, expressed his concerns of grading of road at Highway 5 intersection; Front Foot Fiethod of Assessment; limitation of asses sment district in Phase I; and the 95% and 5% sharings--urged investigation of alternatives. , fir. Heinrich introduced a letter from fir. John B. Keefe, who represents Feeders, Inc., which stated that a road could not be constructed on Feeders property and that they were not a part of any group petitioning for such a road. f•ir. Halter Carpenter, I•ilnnesota Tree, Inc., stated that the ring route would impose exhorbitant costs on him and urged the council to recognize the property owners' positions. He requested that the impact and 9 5%-5% ratio be reduced. fir. Doug Johnson . Atherton, was told that land west of Purgatory Creek would not be assessed. Fir. Bob Hanson, Rosemount Inc., expressed concern about the Village's readiness and ability to pay for such a project. A let- ter of comments was submitted. fir. George Carter, The Preserve, submitted a letter addressing his concerns among which were the scope of the assessment district and assessment distribution. The letter also praised the Task Force for a job well done. s a Council Meeting -4- June 26, 1973 Mr. Lloyd Cherney, owner of 64 acres of property on 169, echoed Mr. Carpenter's words and further stated that it was his feeling that all of Eden Prairie should be assessed. Mr. Cherney asked what percentage of the 1250 acres involved are ready for develop- ment and Mr. Putnam, Village Planner, replied that 148 acres are presently before the Planning Commission even before approval of the ring route. Mr. Cherney said it was music to his ears when fir. Putnam informed him that he was not In an assessable area. A motion was made by Mr. Penzel seconded by Mrs. Meyers to adopt Resolution No. 726 receiving the final feasibility report on the Ring Road Project STR 72-9-26 and to continue the public hearing on July 11, 1973 , at 7:30 P.M. All voted aye. notion carried. I I C. Edenwest Offi ce Building by the Oak Manor Corp. located across the street from Fairway Woods Condominiums. Request rezoning of approximately 3.8 acres from PUD to OFC. It was explained that the road had been pulled out of the flood plain area but this change reduced the parking to about 225 spaces. Additional parking would be available, however, at the adjacent shopping center. Mr. Henning explained that the buildi ng would house about 1/3 medical and 2/3 general office facilities. A motion was made by Hr. Penzel seconded by Mr. Boerger to: a) approve the first reading of Ordinance 225 for Edenwest Office Bui iding rezoning approximately 3 .8 acres from PUD to OFC 1) incl tiding the June 19, 1973 Planni ng Commission's recommendations, 2) incl tiding the Engineer's recommendations, 3) subject to Watershed District resolvement, b) grant a variance of the parking requirements because of the movement of the road and the adjacent use of the parking ramp. All voted aye. Liotion carried. D. Fairway Woods Condominium and Townhouse Project, 2nd Phase, i Edenval e, review of development stage application for townhou ses and condominium units. Concern was expressed about the fire protection and Mr. Henning replied that the new fire code requires outside fire escapes which would be provided. Easement of the pond will be worked out with Mr. Henning and iIr. Peterson sharing upkeep. The pathway system is being worked out. A motion was made by Mr. Penzel seconded by Mrs. Meyers to approve the revised development stage wi thin the original zoning classifi- cation subject to the recommendations of the engineer and planner. All voted aye. Motion carried. Council fleeting -5— June 26, 1973 IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMIIUNICATIONS A. Petition from G. ii. Carter, Jr. President, The Preserve dated flay 1b, 1973, requesting removal of 42 acres (!borings) from Village tax rolls. A motion was made by fir. Penzel seconded by fir. Boerger to refer fir. Carter's peti tion requesting removal of 42 acres (floorings) from Village tax rolls to the Village Manager for study and recommendation. All voted aye. (lotion carried. B. Letter from H. 0. Klossner Hennepin County Engineer, dated June -1-3, 1973, concerning CSA}$ 4 (speed survey and flasher). A motion was made by fir. Penzel seconded by Mr. Boerger to receive and file Mr. Klossner's letter of June 13, 1973. (lotion carried unanimously. C. Letter from Vi liege of Burnsville concerning legal costs in challenge of Fiscal Disparities Bill . A motion was made by Mr. Boerger seconded by fir. Penzel to autho- rize the expenditure of $1,000 from the General Fund Contingency appropriation to assist the Village of Burnsville in defending the State's appeal on the District Ceurt's ruling on the Fiscal Dis- parities Act. Al 1 voted aye. fiction carried. D. Letter from George ii. Hansen Company (J. Gregory Murphy) dated April 18, 1973 , concerning suggestions for control of internal operations. An invitation wil 1 be extended to a representative of the Village auditing firm to a tiork Session meeting to discuss their audit and the 1972 financial report. E. Petition from Warren Shultz for sanitary sewer trunk extension. A motion was made by firs. Meyers seconded by Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 727 receiving the petition from Warren Shultz and to approve Change Order No. 3 to Improvement Contract 51-243 with Orfei & Sons Inc. on a unit price basis for trunk sewer extension on Co. Rd. 4 from Park Terrace Drive to approximately 300 feet north at an estimated cost of $6 ,200. Said sewer extension to be described as Project SAN 73-7-19 . On roll call, all voted aye. fiction carried. F. Petition from Lochanburn Addi tion residents for sanitary sewer and water laterals. A motion ./,as made by .ir. icCuiloch seconded by fir. Penzel to re- ceive the Lochanburn Addition residents' petition requesting sanitary sewer and water lateral s to be included in the 1974 sanitary sewer construction program in coordination with the Vil- lage of Chanhassen to provide sanitary sewer to Lotus Lake area residents. All voted aye. fioti on carried. ' I Council fleeting -6- June 26, 1973 V. RESOLUTIONS AIR? ORDINANCES A. Second readino of Ordinance No. 213, an ordinance amending 6rdinance No. 135, reclassifying 37.75 acres of the total Homart site of approximately 117 acres to C-Regional Commercial . I. motion was made by ;ir. Penzel seconded by Ir. Boerger approving the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 213. All voted aye. Notion carried. J. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 224 approving reclassification to R1-22 for Alex Dorenke;aper's iiaplewcod Park Estates' Crest- wood Terrace. A motion was made by 1r. [merger seconded by Ilr. Penzel approving the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 224. All voted aye. (lotion carried. VI. REPOKTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS. AND C0,111ISSIOt S A. Report of Councilman Penzel on the activities of the South Hennepin Human Services Board. The hoard has been funded by the County for the remainder of 1973 but funds are being, sought for 1974. Joanna :rills will appear be- fore the Vill age Council on July 24, 1P73, for a brief presentation. O. iiemo from Robert 'iilliams, Chairman, Human Rights Commission. supporting the references to housing contained in the proposed riajor Center Area Planned Unit Development. I. motion was made by fir. Penzel seconded by rir. Doerger to receive and file iir. LIIliams' memo. ;lotion carried unanimously. C. Reports of Village Engineer: 1. Approve final plat of The Trails 2nd Addition. ti motion ;•gas made by Mr. Penzel seconded by firs. Meyers to adopt Resolution do. 729 approving final plat of The Trails 2nd Addition. All voted aye. notion carried. 2. Consider street lighting contract with Northern States Power Co. A motion was made by i•ir. Penzel seconded by :1r. McCulloch approv- ing Street Lighting Contract with Northern States Power Company dated June 26. 1973. All voted aye. (lotion carried. D. Vi l lage Clerk's Report: 1. Village Clerk's Recommended License Application List. A motion was made by Ars. Heyers seconded by iir. licCulloch to approve the license Application List dated June 26, 1973. All voted aye. Motion carried. Council fleeting -7- June 26, 1973 E. Village i;anager's Reports: 1. Request authorization to rent the Village-owned cottage on the north end of Starring Lake (formerly Blesi property) for living space for Eden Prairie Coordinator of Community Edu- cation at the monthly rental rate of $140. A motion was made by 'Ir. McCulloch seconded by Mrs. Meyers to table action on this matter until a later date. notion carried unanimously. 2. Request authorization to increase compensation of the Village P1 anner in the amount of $50 per month effective July 1,1973 . A motion was made by Iir. Boerger seconded by Mrs. Meyers to authorize an increase of $50 per month for the Village Planner effective July 1, 1973. All voted aye. .lotion carried. 3. Di scussion of City of Minnetonka's proposed Community Devel— opment Guide Plan. City Managers and Planners will be meeting in July and more information will be forthcoming. 4. iii scellaneous: a. Received and filed a letter from the Metropolitan Sewer Board regarding corrective action on their part to re- duce odoriferous conditions present in the area of the Blue Lake Plant. b. Letter from Mr. Alan R. Vanasek of Jardine. Logan A O'Brien, attornies regarding the Wilke death. A motion was made by Fir. Penzel seconded by Mr. Redpath to refer the letter to the Village Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. VII.FINAFiCES A. Payment of Claims No. 2127 through 2176. A motion was made by Mr. Penzel seconded by Fors. Meyers to approve payment of Claims No. 2127 through 2176. All voted aye. on roll call. Motion carried. The meet ing adjourned at 12:30 A.M. Suzanne K. Lane. Deputy Clerk { RESOLUTION NO. 731 • RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, a resolution of the Village Council adopted the 12th day of . June, 1973, fixed the 10th day of July, 1973 as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: Projects SAN 73-1-04 and WTR 73-2-04 involving sanitary sewer and watermain lateral service to the Kings Court Additions. WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for the making of such improvements were given ten days' publ i shed notice of the Council hearing through.* weekly publications of the required notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 10th day of July, 1973, and WHEREAS, the Village Engineer, through Rieke, Carroll Muller & Assoc., Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for such improvements and has presented said plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY Till VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement as set out in Council Resolution No. 722 of June 12, 1973 and as above indicated is hereby ordered. 2. Such plans and specifications (also described as Improvement Contract 51-255), a copy of which is attached here- to and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 3. The Village Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertise- ment for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published as required by law, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be opened at 11:00 o'clock A.M. on Thursday, August 9, 1973, and considered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, August 14, 1973, in the Council Chambers of the Village Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and fi led with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash de- posit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for not less than % (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Village Council on July 10, 1973. Paul R_ Redpath,Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, III NNESOTA • NOTICE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING ON PROJECTS SAN 73-1-04 and WTR 73-2-04 • Notice is hereby given that the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie will meet at the Eden Prairie Village Hall, 8950 Eden Prairie Road (Co. Road 4) at 7:30 P.N. on Tuesday, July 10, 1973 to consider making the following described improvements: . PROJECT SAN 73-1-04: Construction of sanitary sewer lateral's, street - restoration and appurtenances serving those properties in KINGS COURT ADDITION and KINGS COURT 2ND ADDITION abutting on Canterbury Lane, Crown Drive or Castle Lane_ Total estimated cost p $97,800. • PROJECT WTR 73=2-04: Construction of watermain laterals and appurtenances serving those properties in KINGS COURT ADDITION and KINGS COURT 2ND • ADDITION abutting on Canterbury Lane, Crown Drive or Castje Lane. Total estimated cost a $31,500. Pursuant to M.S.A. Sec. 492.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such' improvements is all that property within or abutting on the above des- cribed limits. Written or oral comments relating to said improvements will be received at this hearing. • • John Frane Village Clerk Village of Eden Prairie • Publish: Eden Prairie-Minnetonka Sun on June 28 and July 5, 1973. VILLA%OFFICES 18950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD I EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343 / TELEPHONE S123 911.2262 eclat preiric June 28, 1973 Re: Projects SAN 73-1-04 and WfR 73-2-04 Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Lateral Service toration for the KingsCourt First tandsSecond Additions • Dear Eden Prairie Property Owner: In response to petitions from several residents in your neighborhood the Eden Prairie Village Council has scheduled a public hearing on the above referenced is a copyoof>the pojects for location map whichshows973 at 7:30 P.M.those properties totbehserved. Py A feasibility report covering the projects has been prepared by Rieke, Carroll, Muller Assoc., Inc., Consulting Engineers, and presented to the Village Council. The the scope of the proposed is lable for constructi nlic andrrelatestthee Vil estimatede Hcostsdescribes assessment rates. The following is a breakdown of the estimated assessment costs per lot: $3,760 Lateral Sanitary Sewer and Street Replacement 1011 Lateral Watermain $5,020 - 1 000 Minus 25% Village Share (S1,000 Maximum) $4,020 520 Plus Sewer and Water Trunk Assessment (this covers part of the cost for sewer trunks, lift stations, water plant, reservoirs,wells and trunk mains) - $4,540 Net estimated assessment per lot (20-year spread). If t nt projects,ve please ucealstl ats941 2262eoristos painuattthepVillage HalllWe will be most happy to talk with you. Very truly yours, 9 JAKI Carl J. Jul ie, P.E. Village Engineer PROJECT MAP ' SAN 73-01-04 WTR 73-02-04 . ! • ?�._r ___L}tles_:�_ . K -—t•rwf i..i...>w.....�;'.y 'a1�' S!!' = •� 1 ..G_- 49? s 7 fiz3= q:.It I tNlT •1rw.fi V ,+r• `__s:1f.._..r�= ;ar:! �..� • 1 .1 • i`f p' ' 1 6 w T_` ..1 tM 3 ; +. HEIGHTS' ~' a • 1i _ i y- .ta i 'c' •:'•r. r -- _ •• S ......:77.�,.. fc ar 1 ^a. ''a t• r tr•! sa. e.a�... a w` • _ • Al` et HOLLY-;...-.0:- i _• ROAD C. . 1- - • • • • . • .••v.• \ 4 I _ny `}! ■•i �_) I..- 2Z . . • _ ;:l ZD'. -.. •srN:1! 2 X V. h �1:. ».. f:!N t + .:f+:s ..rr 5 ` i:.__ :i-r • !;t, D:A S . ;II®/L .1; L 8i g ! ; : - io F' pqs.. • li :r/c f as �S 4=:! a • f. 11 . - EAST1.4 Q _ u3 awww! 'y • _ 1 r a I. • i s . tt 1- tut,.• _ ' ' >•_ ,,rFK_i_ 2-a" Zr ° - - -F..—,irn�-1. �'. .1 I ^• . 4 CLlifi�� 3 4 S_COnD 1 w ADD., • f►•, •DOA, i -- r ez-___:. f_t_l 0i.....;ir , ',:•••.„A•re'cli, ..I! �I• ••t i..�.►...� ••` •�—mot 1 V., 4• - ,tit /�tOSb `I DOA 1»O$,;'cJ *:30.'8:DOA 13 CS -VI'Meth. SANITART SEWER • •A 1 • •--WATERMN! 1• D LATERAL.SEWER ASSESSMENT . • • 1 O LATERAIL.WATER ASSESSMENT • A► TRUNin UTILITY ASSESSMENT F RESOLUTION NO. .32 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, a resolution of the Village Council adopted the 12th day of June, 1973, fixed the 10th day of July, 1973 as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: Projects SAN 73-1-12, WTR 73-2-12 and STR 73-3-12 involving sanitary sewer and watermain lateral service and street sur- facing along Hiawatha Avenue from Scenic Heights Road to south of Hillside Drive. • WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for the making of such improvements were given ten days' published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 10th day of July, 1973, and WHEREAS, the Village Engineer, through Brauer &Assoc., Inc. has prepared plans and specifications for such improvements and has presented said plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement as set out in Council Resolution No. 723 of June 12,1973 and as above indicated is hereby ordered. 2. Such plans and specifications (also described as Improvement Contract 51-256), a copy of which is attached here- to and made a part. hereof, are hereby approved. 3- The Village Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an adver- tisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published as required by law, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be opened at 11:00 o'clock A.M. on Thursday, August 9. 1973, and considered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, August 14. 1973, in the Council Chambers of the Village Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for not less than % (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Village Council on July 10, 1973. Paul R. Redpath, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL "" -- _... I John 0. Franc, Clerk I VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING ON PROJECTS SAN 73-1-12,WTR 73-2-12 and STR 73-3-12 Notice is hereby given that the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie will meet at the Eden Prairie Vil lage Hall, 8950 Eden Prairie Road (Co. Road 4) at 8:30 P.M, on Tuesday, July 10, 1973 to consider making the following described improvements: PROJECT SAN 73-1-12:Construction of sanitary sewer lateral and appurtenances on Hiawatha Avenue from Scenic Heights Road to 1300 feet south. Total es- timated cost is $32,800. • PROJECT WTR 73-2-12: Construction of watennain lateral and appurtenances • on Hiawatha Avenue from the intersection of Scenic Heights Road to 1300 feet south. Total estimated cost is S23,700. PROJECT STR 73-3-12: Construction of grading, bituminous base and surfacing, drainage structures and appurtenances on Hiawatha Avenue from Scenic.Heights Road to 1300 feet south. Total estimated cost is $41.600. Pursuant to M.S.A. Sec. 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvements is all that property within or abutting on the above described limits. Written or oral comments relating to said improvements will be received at this hearing. John Fran Village Clerk Village of Eden Prairie • Publish: Eden Prairie - Minnetonka Sun on June 28 and July 5,1973. • • • a VILLAGE OFFICES/ 8950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD I EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343 1 TELEPHONE IMO901.2262 acJen June 28, 1973 prairie. Re: Projects SAN 73-1-12, WTR 73-2-12 and STR 73-3-12. Sanitary Sewer and Water- main Lateral Service and Street Surfacing along Hiawatha Ave. from Scenic Heights Road south approximately 1/4 mile_ Dear Eden Prairie Property Owner: In response to petitions from several residents in your neighborhood the Eden Prairie Village Council has scheduled a public hearing on the above referenced improvement projects for Tuesday, July 10, 1973 at 8:30 P.M. Attached is a copy of the project location map which shows those properties to be served. A feasibility report covering the projects has been prepared by Brauer & Assoc., Inc., Consulting Engineers, and presented to the Village Council. The report, which is available for public review at the Village Hall , describes the scope of the proposed construction and relates the estimated costs and assessment rates. The following is a breakdown of the estimated assessment costs per lot: $1,427 Lateral Sanitary Sewer $1,031 Lateral Watermain $2,458 615 Minus 25%Village Share $1,843 $1,523 Street Grading, Drainage and Surfacing ($288 additional for concrete curb and gutter). $3,366 $ 520 Plus Sewer and Water Trunk Assessment (this covers part of the cost for sewer trunks, lift stations, water plant, reservoirs, wells and trunk mains). $3,886 Net estimated assessment per lot (2D-year spread). If you have any questions, comments or suggestions about the proposed improvement projects, please call my office at 941-2262 or stop in at the Village Hal 1. We will be most happy to talk with you. Very trul ours, Carl J. Jul ie, P.E. Village Engineer • W csr 7e ST. 1.-n s • // oAK / HwPOs • , e le ocaiio�aaT 1 Z a • t vcID.Ecc I I 1 id 1 t. J • I "'. RC7 €RCDGK - 4E �' Co •4• •• . . LCC&I'ICDN 1"k h Q • • PLATE • ; . BRAUER & ASSOCIATES,INC .PLANNERS 6 I 6440 FLYING CLOUD ORINE • EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55343.J,. 1 "• • .. • a - ; ' I - • • - 1 i . • • r 2•) I . el 4 . CH.' { I 11 1 L. w - II 03 1 ..1LF.ilk .71 . J',1 a `' t lif �cQ .0 i a- • • i' ,Z: I I ..., - . 4 - . • • .l l•� i • '• :i 1..•II • 1 PLANNING STAFF REPORT Date: July 3, 1973 Applicant: Gelco Corp., Hopkins, Minnesota Request: Concept Plan Approval for 30 acre site for corporate office and park use. Location: The Bren Woods parcel on the north edge of Anderson Lakes, south of 494 and West 78th Street From: Richard A. Putnam, Village Planner Thru: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager • Outline: . 1. Existing zoning. 2. Compatibility with M.C.A. planning. 3. Compatibility with surrounding uses. 4. Conceptual site planning evaluation. 5. Issues and recommendations. 1. Existing zoning: Most of the north shore of Anderson Lakes was zoned prior to 1970 to I-5 Park and Park, or public usage. Industrial zoning district would be utilized for office warehouse or industrial manufacturing operations. The industrial categoryis not intended for corporate office locations. The public zoning was to extend back from the lake elevation approximately 250 ft. along the main shore line of the lake. This would not follow the shore line of the inland marsh on the eastern third of Gelco's property. The Gelco site of a little over 30 acres would have approximately 7.7 -8 acres of park zoned today with 22 acres of industrial development land, by the old zoning. It seems apparent that the 250 ft. strip along the north shore of the lake was to preserve the lake's marshy shore character and wooded slopes while providing the opportunity for public use and access without disturbing its natural character. The industrial designation seems to be a response to the visual proximity with Interstate 494 and the access from Trunk Highway 5 or West 78th Street. However, the natural features of this area seem in conflict with the designation as industrial land if the goals and objectives of the 1 968 Guide Plan are considered. 2. Compatibility with M.0.A. planning: a. Transportation: Within the M.C.A. Plan, the Transportation Section addresses itself to the efforts which should be made to encourage pedestrian and alternate use of transportation systems, such as buses, car pooling, and bicycle pathways. The intent expressed in recommendation 6 is'the Ring Route is not conceived or designed as the ultimate transportation solution for the M.C.A. but must be supplemented with other systems as development and trip demands increase." The provision of alternate traffic systems Gelco Corp. Staff Planning Report Page 2 will most certainly have influence upon this site as it relates to the parking demand, the location of the employee's housing, and residents. The M.C.A. Plan recognizes the function of West 78th Street as a feeder road or frontage road connecting development along Anderson Lakes with the Major Center Area, taking its primary access to the Interstate system from the Ring Route interchanges. The use of parking decks and minimum ground coverage with parking is to be encouraged in the initial stages and in the liter stages. b. Environment: Recommendations by the Environment Section of the M.C.A. Plan deal with the information provided the Village during 'development, suggesting that P.U.D. standards be used in all developments and that suitable environmental impact statements be submitted. Within the M.C.A., the Anderson Lakes area is identified as one of the seven prominent natural features and that the public interest in all prominent natural features should be part of every development proposal while encouraging intense urban development. Also, that development encroachment into these areas would be greatly restricted. The intent is to require all develop- ments near the sensitive natural areas to respect the natural site features and to assure the public interest in the retention of these natural features can be guaranteed through dedication or by legally binding easement agreements for the use of these areas. c. Land Use: The Land Use Group identified this area as highly desirable for office use with an intense building form (medium rise rather than low one or two story structures)which would minimize ground coverage while blending into the existing site. Many recommendations of the Land Use Group dealing with the urban design, site preservation, and access by pedestrian and vehicular systems should be used in designing the final product for the Gelco site. The Land Use Group did recognize the potential of the north shore of the lake for park but felt that realistically the funding through Federal and State Agencies are not sufficient to purchase the north shore of the lake; therefore, the alternate development and well designed office would be logical. d. Fiscal: The intent of the Fiscal Group's concern was th at the development which would occur be of sufficient value considering the Fiscal Disparities legis- lation to justify the provision of Village services. Encouraging the intense development of limited amounts of ground and minimizing parking coverage would seem to produce higher value structures which are esthetically pleasing while preserving a great amount of open lands. 1 Gelco Corp. Staff Planning Report Page 3 3. Compatibility with surrounding uses: The Gelco proposal of a four to six story office overlooking the Anderson Lakes area would seem to offer a great deal of compatible features with adjacent sites and the natural features. Adjacent to the west is the land owned by The Preserve, which is an open, sloping meadow with many of the similar characteristics of the land fronting onto Anderson Lakes on the Gelco site. Development of office use in this areawould be extremely compatible with Gelco's proposal or some highway commercial uses such ae restaurant or a motel. The property to the east owned by Northwestern Bell Telephone and McAllister Properties across the marsh is proposed for development as office and residential usage. McAllister Properties'condominium, terraced structure would seem well suited to work with the Gelco office building as the separaticn across the marsh and heavy vegetation would produce adequate buffer. The office use on the land adjacent to West 78th Street would be consistent with Gelco's proposal. The impact of 494 on the Gelco site,if the wooded area adjacent to West 78th is protected,would be minimized with less noise from the freeway. Visual contact for the office structure with the freeway is desirable for image and advertising reasons and identification. The most critical relationship for the Gelco office site is Its treatment and impact upon the Anderson Lakes marsh and park areas. The construction of the structure at the 890 elevation,which is approximately 40-50 ft. above the lake elevation, would produce excellent vistas from the structure and if the structure is sited sensitively within the woods, the scale of the larger trees would blend with the four to six story building. The structural character being of glass curtain—wall would, I believe,complement the park and views from across the lake in that the reflective quality and lightness of the structure would work well with the site. Limitation of the use of the lake edges and marsh Is critical to minimizing the adverse impacts of office development upon this area. 4. Conceptual site plan evaluation: a. Building type and location: The building is proposed in two phases, located on the highest elevation of the site, taking advantage of the views over Anderson Lakes and the visibility above the trees toward the north and 494. Location of the structure in this area will also minimize the tree removal by siting portions in the open meadow and the wooded edge. The orientation of the building to the south and Anderson Lakes will have varied visual impacts when viewed from the park. The tapered building facade and curtain—wall construction will tend to minimize the massive impact, as well as the angle at which the structure is located to the lake. Varied building locations are indicated In the land use alternates a, b, and c. During the design, development, and rezoning stage,detailed studies Gelco Corp. Staff Planning Report Page 4• should be done as to the elevation and potential impact to the lake when viewed from the south. The structural style built as a slab rather than a square would provide more exterior room exposure while producing a more massive building facade. Due to the program for the Gelco Corporation and their space needs as well as the site's features, this building approach In contrast to a square block building was utilized. The ability to orient the building in primarily two or three directions to the south and into the woods makes this type structure highly desirable. b. Parking impact: The parking in the first phase of 350 cars can be handled in numerous ways, three of which are indicated in the land use alternates. Another method would be for ramping and structuring of parking on the site. This option is currently being investigated by Gelco as it relates to its second phase and will have to be weighed with its economic impact as related to its advantages on the site plan. The second phase parking would add approximately another 350 automobiles making a total of 700 cars for 160,000 sq.ft. The Village parking require- ments require 8 spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. of office space, which would produce 1,280 cars on this site. Important to the successful use of this site is the amount of ground coverage with urban development and where that occurs. The alternatives of parking within the woods vs. meadow or the point present options that are very difficul t to evaluate. The requirement of 8 spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. seems somewhat excessive. For example, other one occupant office building complexes, such as Prudential Insurance which has a gross total footage of over 400,000 sq.ft. averages approximately 9.3 trips per),000 sq.ft. of floor area,or the Farmers Union Building with 121,000 sq.ft. averages 3.6 trips per 1,000 sq.ft. Other buildings such as the Federal Building at Ft. Snelling with 674,000 sq.ft. averages 13.5 trips per 1,000 sq.ft. If we compare the trips per 1,000 sq.ft. for Southdale, which has 940,000 sq.ft. , and averages 35.9 trips per 1,000 sq.ft., with their parking ratio, which is approximately 6 parking spaces per 1,000 sq.ft., we find that the ratio between spaces provided and trips is many times higher for trips than spaces provided. The office building does not have as high a ratio -- in other words, 7to I in the case of the shopping center; in the office, because of the longer stay of the u;ps, the ratio would be much higher such as 3 or 2 to 1 in terms of trips compared to spaces. Gelco Corp. Staff Planning Report Page 5 Parking through ramping, siting, and corporate encouragement of alternate transportation modes should be encouraged to reduce the damage to this site. Also, the phasing of the parking and the development should be sited so that if additional parking is not • necessary that irreparable damage is not done to the site, such as locating all the parking in the forest during the first phase with the second phase on the open meadow. Rather, there should be location of parking in the open areas as much as possible, and if alternate movement systems or fewer requirements do not materialize, the second phase in the wooded area. The flexibility offered would be useful to Gelco as well as the protection of the significant site features. c. Access: Access to the site would be from West 78th Street, which connects with 18 on the east and 169 to the west. Plans for the Ring Route's construction with access to 494 and 212 will make the primary direction of approach to this site after 1975 from the west. Access to Co. Rd. 18 will be limited and when upgraded, would be eliminated. The first phase construction should produce between 800 and 1,200 trips per day. These trips would occur during the morning and evening peak hours, 7 - 9 a.m. and 4 - 5:30 p.m. The high volume which existstoday on West 78th Street of over 5,000 trips per day is a result of the lack of access to 169 on the west and the use of Co. Rd. 18 for those trips destined to the south and west on the Crosstown. With the completion of new 212 and the construction of either temporary east ramps with 169 or as proposed in the M.C.A. Plan, the construction of easterly access from 494 to the Ring Routo, many of the through trips now using West 78th Street would be routed to faster routes. West 78th Street, viewed as a feeder road to the Ring Route, providing access directly to adjacent properties, is not viewed as a through arterial street. d. Park and natural feature preservation: Three significant areas have been identified and should be ranked in terms of order of importance on this site. The first is the Anderson Lakes shore and related slopes ris well as the inland marsh on the eastern side of the site. The second area is Bren's Woods, which is a mature forest located to the northwest of the marsh. The third area is the open meadow which has high visibility with both the marsh and the lake shore. In evaluating these three distinct areas of the site, a priority listing when considered in light of the function of Anderson Lakes Park as a major wildlife habitat and water fowl nesting area would in my opinion indicate the#1 priority as the marsh and related lake shore edge. Secondly, because of the somewhat limited and isolated nature of the chunk of Bren's Woods which has been cut off from the Smetana area by 494, the wooded area should be of second priority in terms of preservation and its primary function should be Gelco Corp. Staff Planning Report Page 6 that of a visual amenity with limited use of a woodland habitat. The third and most developable area seemingly would be the open meadow fronting to the southwest onto Anderson Lakes. Encroachment on the shore line and marsh would seem undesirable with limited encroachment for parking and structure in the wooded areas. Rezoning today of approximately 7 - 9 acres for park based on the 250 ft. back from the water indicates that the Gelco proposal with four acres dedicated park is approximately t which exists in zoning today. If the 6.7 acre wet marsh area is included, the total open space area would be approximately 10-12 acres which would be in excess of what the zoning map would indicate as park today. The protection of the lake and natural wildlife environment would indicate that the north marsh in Pintail Point should be protected from urban encroachment. The method to accomplish this could vary from deeding and dedication of the property by Gelco to the Village to the negotiation of the scenic easement between Gelco and the Village pertaining to the limitation of use of the marsh area and its related slopes. The interest of the Village is to provide an adequate area for public and walkway if desirable and for the protection of areas reserved for wildlife. The method of accomplishing these goals may vary as to the economics of the Village and Gelco. The concept of preservation for the lake edge and the northern marsh and its related slopes is critical and a method must be devised to accomplish this objective. e. Phasing: The first phase of 95,000 gross sq.ft. with 20,000 sq.ft. of ground coverage would produce a 4-5 story structure with parking for 350 cars at grade. The second phase sxpansion enlarging to 160,000 grosssi.ft. and 40,000 sq.ft. ground coverage or approximately one acre would require by Gelco's best projection 700 parking spaces. The provision of these additional spaces to be handled with additional 350 at-grade spaces or ramping and structuring of spaces over existing areas. The development of the 160,000 gross sq.ft. second phase would be the maximum allowable development upon this site and would not permit additional development on unused sections of the property. 5. Issues &recommendations: a. Site use 1. Recommend the use for corporate office for Gelco Corp. of first phase size of 95,000 gross sq.ft.with second phase expansion to a maximum 160,000 gross sq.ft. and maximum parking for 700 automobiles at full development. Geloo Corp. Staff Planning Report Page 7• b. Building treatment 1. Encourage the use of a medium rise(4-6 story) structure minimizing the ground coverage sited in such a fashion to minimize the impact upon the Anderson Lakes area. 2. Encourage the use of staggered facade and curtain-wall construction to blend the facade with the natural surroundings. 3. Orientation of the structure in such a fashion as to minimize the encroachment upon the wooded area and the visual massiveness as viewed from the lake. c. Park land, size and location 1. That the protection of the lake edge be a ssured through deeding and public dedication to a distance back which is agreed upon by the developer and Village, which follows the natural terrain. 2. That 6.7 acre marsh be re served for wild life habitat and open space • use for perpetuity either through deed or dedication to the public with restrictions upon use as natural, conservation space, or through restrictive scenic easements with the private ownership with public interest through scenic easement restrictions on use. 3. Protection of the character of Bren's Woods as viewed from the marsh and Anderson Lakes by maintaining a significant edge between any development occurring within the woods as well as protection of the overall vistas from the park. d. Parking 1. Encourage the use of ramped or structured parking to minimize the urban encroachment upon the site's high amenity features, of the woods and open meadow. 2. Permit a maximum parking at grade of, in the first phase, 350 automobiles, and in later phases, 700 autos;if additional parking space is required, it would require structuring at a second level. 3. Require extensive berming and landscaping of the parking area occurring in the meadow to screen them from the lake and park as viewed from the south and to the west of the site. 4. Recommend that Gelco investigate the use of carpools and other inducements to encourage employees to utilize grouped transpor- tation or public transit when available. This would minimize the parking requirements nece ssary. e. Access 1. Coordinate opening of the Gelco offices with the road improvements to West 78th Street and its intersection with Co. Rd. 18 on an interim basis as well as the improvements to the Village Ring Route and 494 to be opened in late 1975. 2. After the opening of new 212, examine the traffic patterns on West Gelco Corp. Staff Planning Report Page 8 78th Street to determine if significant reductions of volume have been recognized and take appropriate action to restrict the use of West 78th Street as a through road by signing, speed limits or vacations of parts of the road. • • DP July 3, 1973, Planning Commission Meeting • D. Gelco Corporation, office building located on the north shore of Anderson Lakes. Request concept plan approval and future zoning under the FICA PUD;preliminary presentation. Staff report and recommendations. Mr. Em Greenburg stated that the four to six story building would be placed at the high point of the 18 usable acre site to maximize the view across the meadow to the lake. Gelco hopes to be in the ground by October and occupying the facili- ty by late 1974. Mr. Ray Geiger gave a slide presentation of the site and illus- trated the three land use proposals being considered. Ramping is being considered for parking. The staff report of July 3, 1973, was explained by Mr. Putnam. after which lir. Greenburg stated that Delco is not in agree- ment with Section (c) Park land, size and location, number 2 regarding the perpetual reservation for open space of the 6.7 acre marsh. An alternative will be discussed with Mr. Perbix, the Village Attorney. Action Taken: A motion was made by Hrs. Meyers seconded by Mr. Lynch to recommend concept plan approval for the 30 acre site for corporate office and park use based on the staff report of July 3, 1973 and its recommendations (a) through (e). All voted aye except Mr. Sorensen who abstained based on lack of time to consider the presentation. Park & Recreation Commission 6/25/73 Meeting B. Qelco Corporation. Jessen stated that the Staff had reviewed the Gelco Corporation site plan and that they felt that the Commission ought to establish priorities in terms of the most valuable natural features of the site. This priority assignment would then allow the Staff to work with Gelco in developing the best possible site plan within the parameters of the priorities. Jessen reviewed the Village's financial situation for park land acquisition, stating that he felt there would be no Federal or State money for the north shore of Anderson lakes for at least 15-18 months, if ever. Given this situation, it appears that development will occur in this area and that one of the basic questions was the consideration of Gelco as an appropriate land use for the north shore. Mr. Greenberg stated that Gelco has reconsidered their program for the site and they have reduced the number of cars programmed to approximately 350 from the 431 mentioned previously. Garens asked if they had further con- sidered the potential of the site to handle expansion of the corporation. Mr. Greenberg again stated that Gelco is a paper-moving company, not an industrial company, and thus they didn't feel that their growth would be as ' rapid as it has in the past given new computer technology, etc.which makes the processing of paper relatively easy without greatly increasing staff. Mr. Greenberg indicated that while Gelco purchased 30.7 acres, they actually have approximately 18 acres on which to develop. In their Judgment, the meadow was the place to intensify their use while protecting the woods front severe encroachment. Blacklock asked about the open space zoning on the north shore of Anderson Lakes. She said that she recollected that the open space area was to be 250 feet from the lake and that the industrial zoning went from that line, 250 feet from the lakeshore, to West 78th Street. Putnam replied that were the Gelco plan approved with less than 250 feet, it would merely require rezoning of that land and that in fact, their proposed land use was more I' desirable than the industrial I-5 zoning presently on the remainder of the property. As a result, it might well be in the Village's best interest to rezone and reduce the open space area. Garens suggested that the priority assignment on the natural features of the site be as follows: Priority 1: Lake and marsh--these features not be touched In development. Priority 2: Woods--encroachment be minimized. Priority 3: Meadow--Blacklock urged that whatever development occurs in the meadow should not intrude on the regional park across the lake and along the Lakeshore, thus calling fora very sensitive site design. • . Minutes Park&Recreation Commission Erickson stated that there appeared to be Commission agreement on the Gelco plan as an appropriate land use on the north shore of Anderson Lakes,and on the assignment of priorities for the natural features of the area, and that the Staff should work with Gelco in developing a plan consistent with those priorities. This plan will be presented at the next Commission meeting oh July 9, 1973, and the P.U.D. hearing will be held before the Council on July 10, 1973. • June 19, 1973, Planning Commission Meeting C. Gelco Corporation, office building located on the north shore of Anderson Lakes. Request concept plan approval and future zoning under the HA PURpreliminary presentation. Mr. Putnam explained that this request has been reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission. The Commission and resi- dents of the area would prefer to have the area used for park however acquisition of funds for purchase i s remote. It i s • the staff's opinion that office use would be a good use. Mr. Em •Greenburg described Gelco as a computer oriented, world-wide leasing firm. The four or five story building erected would be oriented toward the lake and the woods on the northern part of the site would be preserved. Because Gelco wished to exercise their option to purchase the land in Mid July, The Commission indicated that they had no reservations about the concept. However, they did wish to be assured that the wooded area would be preserved. The request was referred to the Staff for review and recom- mendations. ;, � I Parker Klein Associates Fourthirty Oak Grove 3336364 Minneapolis Minnesota 55403 I 1 - 1 - I I I I I I I I A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL TO THE VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE BY THE I GELCO CORP CONTENTS • PLAN AREA IDENTIFICATION Legal Description Boundary Map rExisting Land Use Map Existing Zoning/Guide Plan Soil Analysis and Conclusions Soils/Topography Map t: Photographs [. t PLAN PROPOSAL • L Concept Plan Objectives 1' Land Use Data Land Use A Map Land Use B Map Land Use C Map South/North Profil e Transportation Utilities Utilities Map • t PLAN AR EA A IDENTIFICATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 That part of Government Lot 6, Section 13, Township 116, Range 22, lying 1 South of the Original Center line of State Highway No. 5, excepting that part described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the East line of said Government Lot 6 and the southerly right of way line of said State Highway; thence West along said Southerly right of way line a distance of 261 feet; thence South in a straight line to a point in a line drawn parallel with and 250 feet South of said Southerly right of way line, which point is 264.7 feet West of the East line of said Government Lot 6, measured along said parallel line; thence East along said parallel line to a point therein which is 14.7 feet West of the East line of said Govern- ment Lot 6, measured along said parallel line; thence South on a line parallel with and 14.7 feet West of the East line of said Government Lot 6 (_ to a point 1563.95 feet South of the Southerly line of State Highway No. 5; thence East to the Southeast corner of said Government Lot 6; thence North on the East line of Government Lot 6 to the point of beginning. Subject to easement for highway purposes in State Highway No. 5. This description taken from a survey by Egan Field and Nowak on 4 May 1973. �t ., • . • I - , ,--....-- - --..-----..-1---- ,,) ...•,:j- _ _ 1 - ---- ,.'\. e•-•;_.____L/ c_,... -- .-_._.__,.::!_;-71:---.--L:-,i,, I ---.---,-.-,-,- sr''.----t-- 1_-./_:".'•' +---.4- ----;.----.----,-,— . , - .... . ._.x.. tt1:11...... • / 1..,------ ; • 1 1 i _ ' 'I ' ''''''''''''' . ' ( '' - • \:-.1 1 _-1 , c1 .' \\ -.;-7---;:-. '' { ''' 1; ''''''' '(-"-- ' \ ..,''''',:-..-.)-r'.' ..'-.4....'`,. ''''-.‘)/31),//11,,ii:i.itik,....',- ,A,,t, ..•,‘...‘..: /41;,',1:11-,:—.., 1 \ , \' . -•-.. —,,,:N ,,,‘ ,., :. , ,/ i / ,\,. i ';.• .'' , , Lj) ‘,"- ' . "'-".7-`-•"'; , ' 1 '// • , , . ,. • , ... \ / ,1 , \\ ./. ,/,/, / i‘r / .44. ' 4 i A k .•',. ' 1 r ' i •."- ,\ ' .',-..- ' .///, ' ,) i.;/ i .../ I '\ '' -\`''' s' '•''''.- >714 /":- '-/yl \ \•,,,:-..' ',,''i i I I • ;\ 46',.: ‘‘.\ IC\ \ ' Is, '\ .'• '; ,,,,/- -"----/7 1,---i S 7- S 4. [ )) 1 \ L '''S'•''— --/i)I Os(i r--;----',,': / ..4 i • ----,;, ,,,,x„, ,,-._ 1 , ,) i 1.401.,- / 7 , -il,‘ 1 ' I •..-ft ',...„..,.. .",..'-.:''''' •\. N.,.... ')'1`11 ' \ ' ,' , ,1 ,,,'' 1 ' ''.s.. 'S,"NN• \\V\ ''-,:.‘‘,\ ,\, \:::.\'. ,„,\ ...... ... .4 1.. 41, r.t .., ' ' ,/ 4,4 •:-,s, \\ \\`‘`---_. _./ , ,\...,'":\ '\ 4) - , , .8, ,• I I ......../ , ..,,.., .. `. ', - _I c •\' ,',\ 4. '''' ' • -- \ '. I i'''' . • s% "; . ' \'''''‘' ' ' . -/ ),,---,'\''\ \,,\, ' ` \ / •' . .' )i'',' I, , ‘,.. ''''',.— -- 11/'// ‘`‘‘,"‘--) s., . \i, l''• -C: '''' A i' --- I 1/42, -..- ,:• , /•., ,,,i,„, .4 ' .e. , ., ..,.. I -‘‘•. ', , •-•:',. _.„ „,--- ,'., . I ) I t I.. .;---- .. _--".:-/ l \ , \I.:-' \\\ \ I. !, :. ' \i lily' \ 1 I 1 I. i I ••' ) 1 t I - - I I I -r BOUNDARIES , '- rmien. N i I. ... I . . 111 W Mth_ST_ __ —— .._,-, ....--4,4-. -.--..--• ,...- '*V••••••••''•'e•••*.••%.•••••••4•:.•:•$,V•100!;..!:•'1.0:4..'''*****•••••••',,•••• we,•••••.4;••••••:Ire0.44.••••••4".•• •a•..•••••,....4••••••. ........ . . . x 14%,441..... bld.rit , 1 .• %,:ti: .‘4.5,y,rero; ':',...i.):), ./),. . .,-tt ,., .. 1 '' I \ i ,'4, ‘1:.") , .I.., ,I.V 0 , 1 /•.,"1. A i .PNI ) ))'• .. ,:), •,f ? .1 ');1 J .) ' '). ,o'i-' '1';'?''''''' • ''>•X44.1. ' !a':', 11 ' •Ir • k • \v.. ,-•••.,..!. •4,,, .- 1r4.., •$: -..• ro ,,,,z... BrOILL• '..--- ' '-'°"''''''^. $,Jtl., .k• )-)•,-4-.•,,J4t,-.,..1., , :,,,•- -•-•t it....-:•••• • I , •' ,„ ;-?..01;1S-)7k:I, -ki_., .13P "Pp-iyq,44'): It: 7 -- , ..,,,„, ,, .), ..". ,,..„L ,..• 4 . , ,,,,F,,, 7,.3,5. '.. . ',0 ....,--- — I •4-s w--. ,t, ,..... 1 '- - 4.''. .' 1 ......)..,.• •,,i.-,,,, .,1,41, N.. :.. . , 7. 0).;, *-5 ,,,.....). •,p 11,,.. il, 41).0- 1 , A, .4 J. --le)- 1 .•1 ", I.., ,N + ,,,• \ • '\ • , 1,1,• „ :004 * ':',0•*-4 •"•.' 4 4, _ 4 Ili1. ,, J• • , -- •1 lki.)4i. .S24.1, 4 4 •••• . 4•1' frV, / I 4,1 1 . -1-,:.. ) '.,t T' - - - - -., - -'7. - . - / ei..-% -;. ..•-._ • .!.. . I it.... ,-;., ...R....14 IS, !Pt...A.,....4i .,• S... ''' i f. t * 4 4 ,te ,,f, •,.. ••••i• ""t:•t,16_4•',-- , \ v . rg-:.,4‘.4,- -r7.---t"4 ,,,, ,. . . ..... 4 4 4.- 1 .6.'16,7,... 4•••ne' ,t',...4. \ ,, 'I __-.44----, '..te7.•4,' .40.. .,...tl ••:.14. *'. -',d, 'SO , L.I.:1•.1 , i'i,-.:) , r l'::'NA_ % .. ; * ..•. / " * 4 '' ---—4.— / IP' )xa. I .k. — . •.. .. • . ' * '... - • • , * 4,,* , ----,-,-- I \ , 46% s'l'' 4trso / \ '4. , if I Z..... MEADOW 9 acres - _ 4 _ , 1 $ .41$ / / - ' ! 1 4. * MARSH 1.9 IICTIO meander to water 6.7 seri Inland wit nsersh \ , (.,,.. \• tit fi 1 'WOODS 481 9 OCT•111 4142 il 1 i I* P ,4 1 1:s '''• SHORELINE 4 acres__ , 1 I ri iiiirip \ E)CJSTIINIG LAN) USE I I 1 .. 1 il St) \r& .\,,,.',,,s,,,:.,,,:kt,,,:k c\i( \......t.)1... w ' M, ,. 1 _ 1 [ Ma Ca Cs \�� ( J I J • -- 215 fKt .. 1494 1 • .J11§141 [ \(P ,Il ( ' ! t GEI.CO M' SITE • 4 4W -,''''''''''7.,,:,*..,, , lir". #:ImiiiR I . • g ii IMMERCIAL I L IONO ACCESS 0 ACCESS I EXISTING ZONING I GUIDE PLAN . i I SOIL ANALYSIS The uplands area, represents approximately 83.5% of the total available site area. Soil conditions in this region are very favorable for building development. The ground water table in the uplands area is more than 20 feet below site surface, and will in no way effect the construction or subsequent performance of the foundations. In general, the soils at 4 foot depth or more below present grade would have an allowable load bearing capacity in the order of 4000 lbs. per sq ft. The small pocket of sand in the vicinity of Borehole 4 would have to be removed or densified prior to building construction. It is our opinion that the organic soils.in the swamp area at the east edge of the property are so compressible as to be totally unsuited for even parking lot construction. Furthermore there is a distinct possibility that the swamp area is required for tempor- ary storm water ponding. It is recommended that this area should not be developed, if at all possible. These conclusions are only of a very general nature. When definite building location, size and height has been determined, further soil exploration should be done and specific foundation rec— ommendations derived. From a report submitted May 10, 1973 by SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. I - L, _-- ,-, I ------- — -- --. • ---. •••— •.%---"-.' ' ... .7----P-- IN IN Mt.M .)' -1 • .I,4. ,____ NU.•MI•77•77----7 j------_.. ".•'-' ' .. -." 7.;—_— _ -- :,....... ..X. .:•••••vow 1 T---..„, .,,- ,s, ,,, 7' ,.•.:',/ ;',.---c----/- 1(('4, 1„.:r..-7-- / ') .\ _ 1 -. ..._. %\ .., , f,4•' s- '--- •;;p•l'; '-,' ---- -- -- --I ' • ' 1 -,, I , -s, _z,._- .. -‘,N.-- -4 •-_, . , ,-'4 -. \-,'•`, • •i•••-" - ,‘,s.--__., . ‘; . ' ..,,,,,s;\ -.N-— ,:',, ( ,--:_-_-_ _,-.--) .1'\'--,..-----,--• id 1-• \---` '',:-.--'- -/ \-:----:-.;,\'' •,-....2,,s-.Y.`rcz"--,--'':'-----) V..-- ..-----):;i '1 \ /,-., --,) /1 c....N.-;N--,,.• !--:: y,',..,,;k - ,,,,.-:,.•,,, 's,-----:', --__ Jj( ,,-••,- .,...0--// ,, , ,!!!,/ r-Mbi','.,„ ,,,;.-__, ,-- ,,<,..-, ,-- - ,- - -, \ .,./7 -- ' • — \ 1 1,),0 ,. . , 1 ,1 ' ',, '• In , ' //)' `-----.. •..„:--„:„,,--.. I / (( t4 I 0 f 1 -/i----/ :-.----,----- "---.. --.:- .., ---4- , ....,"5"-----...„.1,..:.> ,......'„,'--...i...---;:,,,,, , ,., „-- . 11. ill .7 I / 1 (''''", ''''''',\\:::. \\.(1.1 :.\•)\\\":".,, ..\ .I. 4. 1 i/ ft\-- \\'' '' - "\\ -'' 2 i . ' i( ,;, ,.. ---N , ' \\\v,,,, ,-- _ ,r--- ... \\ -, 47 -7_., ".\•.,' . 1 \ ‘ I ; I ... • -._..\-=\ ----' ) 1),- , `-%\ \ ,/"..-,--;_ , - . ,),., .;,•,.. \----; , -..5,--,,...- / _ \ :-. ,11,7 / '\ ) \ r`L,\,-.,.. ' -- / 1 - . ' \' \ • ''' ';.\ •, / 1 ,/, I _ __ _ ,,- k,, - / ',/ ,', /4-, 4,- 4. ---, ..,, . , --7 /—/--- - --- - I i A-k-J.1'---' <•‘, . ' . ..."_1'jy 4 / I. '\ , - // 'i \ ‘. \ s j 46%•,..,_ I --... 1, / ,1 , ir1 4- / •-" /I' I .4.6.. I I a irtIL ANALYSIS - _ I \ 1 SOILS! TOPOGRAPHY • 1 . I . . • • '• ,' .,.. . I • • I I • I I I I 1 I • } / . . .. f: y ; y . . . I . ` \« w K ° \ . :wry\ | - _ \ � �� �\ \%�± � . \\}\ » \ \ > 2 : «z »?� y © ! t - N Q I \ \ k\�:�\ "�/z�r : a '. » ®\ 2 4ƒ «T 3 �� . . : { . ~» /2\d& . ... % A. . ' \ §%©\ - . , I . " i - ` � � , g. % »y\%� I % d. f I ~\\ ��>� , z « z \\\y, I d?'\/ \ i \ I / < , I ~ \ I I I . i . I @ • 1 �` • • I y}` 1 rI• kw eG' Mh N1k I t,i v F I ' , I I � ..:. .., _.F'4 .. _ 4� Y}t gg M1.s -- .-:'.I'''.::':',"''..' , .s as } 4� ° PLAN PROPOSAL CONCEPT PLAN OBJECTIVES: - 1. To locate 95,000 GSF in an initial stage of office building space wi th future expansion potential of 160,000 GSF. ( 2. To locate 350 cars in an initial stage with expansion in the future to 700 cars. 1: 3. To take advantage of and maintain the integrity of the natu ral amenities such as: a. View towards and across Anderson Lakes b. High point of site as building location Cc. The woods to north, marsh to east and lake to south as natural barriers to encroachment d. Natural slope of meadow to terrace parking 4. To minimize within economic considerations the impact of parking Iupon the site. 1 5. To dedicate to the Village of Eden Prairie 4± acres of natural t shoreline and open water. it I, „6ti r . • k I 6. To retain title to inland wet marsh of 6.7 acres and the Cnatural shoreline adjacent to it. 7. To contain height of building to 6 floors above grade. 8. To request change from I5 industrial park to MCA zoning regula- 7 Ctions. is • i • 4 cpr,; I LAND USE DATA • Building: Phase 1 95,000 GSF 20,000 sq ft ground coverage F Phase 2 160,000 GSF 40,000 sq ft ground coverage 1- 1 IParking: Phase 1 350 cars Phase 2 700 cars Marsh: 6.7 inland wet marsh acres 1.9 meander to water acres Park Dedication: 4± acres Woods: Phase 1 Phase 2 A 6 acres 4 acres 0 7.5 acres 4 acres C 8.5 acres 6 acres I I Y ti • I n tlt:J 9 Lam' y f:°r41. � �.fir► t4Y"`Yj"` �V ,,,,J�. I I , 4r . /,, 4 • .4'. , I. „ .•- Uri‘,.r,,,,„ k ut!"..4 . q\ \pitiktv 4 .,, • / , I - ..., _..... , --, \,,,,,--, --_,,,,, II I 0 MARSH _..../N��III ,..`,e�` _� 1 ■ BUILDING phasel I "-, BUILDING phase2 e'er ►_s war I 0 PARKING phasel V, PARKING phase 2 I 0 WOODS ' tilil� PARK DEDICATION 1\ •, y LAND USE A o 4,. N I I I .. _ . 7 __, • , LvV , �ski yVa .`.F t vye +s1 yo.\ . .,.. .. , ls x +` • ¢.ram, tS " ' I ,A;it;: I tb ril' ' n k\\ �111N1111q� �� �4EII�c��iuUo�� \ i / I C MARSH _ l�l.0. _1, • BUILDING Phase.' '__ [_] BUILDING phase2 ij I 0 PARKING Phase.' �� �3 PARKING phase 2 7 En WOODS �- I OM PARK DEDICATION V LAND USE B Y ?'�>�N I I I - r . ..:6 '••- iii-$"••••••,,,c,'':'..6,t .,.t,.1.'s •..i 1-- i,,,,-`4..,:..4,. , IA./ y `j et' f".u./'.b , V:,V,ostt, I4.,, — „.7,0. — .',::4::7.;:+44(,;:.7::1,1:- . ' Cii L r�0'i*/.1 tr'‘.x t'!'44,��'� 1 i��\111111,4 G..‘,„ . / 1 11'\Ittti\I 11 I! / ' I O . I era , 111 MARSH �y IIL P ■ BUILDING phasel [.] BALDING phase 2 mE. I D PARKING phase! I E PARKING phase 2 1 a• 1 WOODS im I 'A PARK DEDICATION I LAND USE C o 1,rN I I --u I1 En ,1 II II f I , ,, _ . r - •h 4 O co H 1 En 111 1 IL 1 _ :,\ ,,, -- , f. 2 4 CC 1 2 ___ , ..,. 1 _--:)4---- A.,___ I ;_-- � i N., z r 1 TRAI'ISPORTATION Initial vehicle access to site from north and east -- would be the interchange at County Road 18 and Interstate 494 then f along west 78th Street. From the south and west access would be County Road 18 to west 78th Street, 169-212 to west 78th Street and State Highway 5 to west 78th Street. As the Ring Road is developed with its access from Interstate 494, State Highways 159, 212 and 5, more of the vehicle movement will be from the west along 78th Street. Only when the current access from Interstate 494 to County Road 18 is removed will the move- ment be predominantly from the west. See Guide Plan drawing on preceeding pages. No mass transit is planned for the immediate future. I ' • • • I UTILITIES 1. Gas and electricity presently exist along west 78th Street. 2. City sewer is available on the east edge of the Preserve or approxi- mately 800 feet to the west of subject property and would be brought along 78th Street as a lateral upon request. 3. City water is presently being constructed at approximately State Highway 169 and Stage Highway 5 and could be provided as a trunk lalong 73th Street based upon request to serve subject property. • • • l C 1 - i• l: _ ------ --- ---- --„, - - ---"-7.--.\,_- - •—._.,„,_. • ___ - .,,, -.____... . „„ii. . .4d I. stairerssauFa I • ' ".. i....ni_vlin i I .. ...--....,-- .- - ..-,- .• z............,, ,••• - ,...,mom go. -r- n_ A a 54. --.Wil-iir ....., ,— I %7IN ' ••• !c----,,.;„„:-.-- 4,, 11 _,..--,N._,......... k.\\ , ._ 1, \s,„„.„. , 7-r-- ---___-_.„, ‘,i - '\ 7!,i• --f, - ._- \''c\;, \._77,' )31,1,/,,/,—ig,, •— - '-'-';'-r- —; —: f„/,, --\ ,W),/ 7/,1,'// \.,•Nto -- --,, --'---- t---'''',-''\.„\•-'''',,‘1.1.''''-`7.1 -.------,-LI) 1 /,'I( i, /: ',,_.,‘\‘,\•,',-. ,,,,,, ,;.4/ / ., ,, ,\-, ,, ‘ , '--—- -, 'S' ..-:1•,-. --•', /1 I" \ \ •'\''' -f/ / \ \• , , \ \ '".), \\' ,‘.>''''',';-'\.-. '•.2,W,,,. i ' I' 0.\\\`‘'-/, ./////./ 'V' 4' 4 *, '''''''''''''''-‘: I \ N... 'N'•\\'‘'' ,-/;)\ '7,-11---:' /.'/- \:-.S.--- :'''7;t/ ,, \ \\• •-. .1 // ,--------":":/,-- _.-„.., ,////'% ....._- ' I ) ))) ,, --_'- ,2 i r )1'•\, /-,/-r--/ --!,:_,,,, , oi 1I ..\. _ W3 „,''\\'',, 1, (-("2 7---1/ '17 4'• -4.` * :---:-:-77. - -- i 1 // / 3,-— ? --<,'\'''• -.,,\,---,"--- \\ .„ -\ , , i ( 11 I 4.'-."' . '-\•''' .\\\•\\'''-)''' ''''\'N—''-- s• \\, 7 . -7• , \-;,.,, \--_____,-- I \ ''‘‘‘\\ \ •••-•-, • ,,?....s.,./.., „- __4„.. __ _______, , k„, ) ,)7 y ` \\ii\ .*"‘ . ''. •'''-':• •.!y/ ..,"'....,, ,- ---- 4 4. ..-- .....,...,,,, i 7- /----, , i; . I \,\ \•,.. -' .:, 1 ..,‘,,,, -• --"",, -zd.7//, , 4\4; _ -•_,,/ / 7-, \ ‘ i. \,) • I- I 4O 1 's.'---' •.-- -4// I / r / ."- •'''---, ,--_/- ''' ; it , ,,'", , IENVIIIIIIM.M. LECTRIC existing I ,/*// •-•• ; \ \ I es ATER TRUNK p.tIton. ‘c , ) 1 . SANITARY SEWER ATERAL petitioned 1,\ I ii 41 I ___— GAS existing ,..,.. 1 I Ii, ,' - ---- -- ‘\4‘ - .2 1 I \ UTIdITIES - I I .. • ... . , • . • 7 /0 7 T 4AKE 494 was Imue FACE MM. STERLING FIELD ASSOCIATION, 1 NC. 11110/4.44 EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343 /We oMwNwsstN ' 0<7 C.fr June 11,1973 ua J/NR'Ofq'f cso Ai ro Ai,PAaPr Mr. Bob He tar ich i Village Manager Eden Prairie, Ilion. Dear Bob: Now that my term as president of the Sterling Field Association is about to expire, I feel it is appropriate that I thank the Village for some very fine cooperation in providing great speakers at our business meetings this past year. Your presentation.at our November meeting was very well received and created considerable interest; Marty Jessen's at our March meeting on our park program was very interesting and informative; and Keith'aall's presentation at our recent Jurae meeting on the drug situation was very enthusiastic and of equally high caliber. Since we know the time you have devoted to us was "above and beyond" and at 1 sacrifice to your own families, we want you t o know how deeply ur^ ap?reciate it. Very Truly Yours, 116-7 Raymond 11.Carey, Pres. 41,ced 494 MACS STERLING FIELD ASSOCIATION, INC. "WC rail EIDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55349 ONAA//MlSEN 0 C:1 June ll,It 973 AFE R csoy�JAMn N #e r ls'. Bob Heinrich VLl1age Manager Eden Prairie, Nirm. Dear Bob; Now that my term as president of the Sterling Field Association is about to. expire, I feel. it is appropriate that I thank the Village for some very fine cooperation in providing great speakers at our business meetings this past year. Your presentations at our November meeting was very well received and created considerable interest; Marty Jessen's at our March meeting on our park program was very interesting and inform,.tive; and Keith:Tail's 7:>resentrtion at our recent June meeting on the drug situation was very enthusiastic and of equally high caliber. Since we knots the time you have devoted to us was "above and beyond" and at sacrifice to your am families, we want you to knea how deeply w-s arnrec iate it. Very Truly Yours, h Raymorsd H. Carey, Pres. ' j+ate • VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 210 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING LICENSE FEES, PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES AND AMENDING ORRDINANCES SETTING FEES AND CHARGES. Section 1. Fees, Charges and Rates Authorized and Defined. The fees, charges and rates for the purposes set forth in this Ordinance for licenses, permits and eunicipal serv- ices shall be in the amounts set forth in the following sections. Reference to the amounts set forth herein in other Ordinances of the Village may be made in such terms as "required fee", "established fee", "required license fee", and "license fee in the required amount", without specific reference to this Ordinance, in which event the amounts herein set forth shall be applicable. Section 2. Priority of Application. If fees, charges and rates are set forth in other Ordinances of the Village which are now in effect, but have not been set forth in this Ordinance, then the fees, charges and rates thereby spe- cifically set forth shall be effective for all purposes. In the event that such amounts shall appear in other Ordinances of the Village, but shall appear in this Ordinance, the amounts appearing in this Ordinance shall supersede the others and those sections of Ordinances containing references to fees and charges which are contained herein are herein repealed. • Section 3. Business Licenses and Permits. The fees, charges and • rates for business licenses and permits, the duration or term thereof, and the conditions applied thereto, shall be as set forth in the subdivisions which follow: Ordinance No. 210 Page Two • LICENSES Terms and Type of License Conditions Fee Subd. 1 BUILDING: Contractors (Ord. #200) Annual One and Two Family $15.00 M11ti—Family 25.00 Gas Fitters (Ord, #157) Annual 10.00 Heating and Ventilating Annual 15.00 (Ord. #200) Individual Sewage Disposal Annual 15.00 (Ord. #34) Signs (Ord. #34) See Permit Section Water Softening and Fil tering Annual 10.00 (Ord. #201) Wells (Ord. #43) Annual 15.00 Utility Installer Annual 50.00 (Ord. #201) Subd. 2 Cigarettes (Ord. #32) Annual 12.00 Subd. 3 Dance Halls (Ord. #102) Annual • Public Dance 1) $400.00 if live musicians are employed. 2) $100.00 where music is provided exclusively by electrical or mechanical device. Incidental Dance 1) $300.00 if live musicians are employed. 2) $ 50,00 where music is provided exclusively by electrical or mechanical device. Ordinance No. 210 Page Three Terms and Type of License Conditions Fee $25.00 when live musicians are employed and when the applicant is a religious, charitable or other non-profit organization and the permit is for a special event or limited period;when music is to be provided exclusively by electrical or mechanical means for such a non-profit organization, the fee shall be $10.00. No fee is required for dances conducted by the Park and Recreation Department or any agency of the Eden Prairie School District. Subd. 4 Dogs (Ord. #134) Annual $ 15.00 Subd. 5 Dog Kennels Annual Commercial 50.00 Private 10.00* *Includes three individual dog licenses and tags. Subd. 6 Drive-In Theaters (Ord. #3) Annual 30O.DD Subd. 7 Excavations, Pits and Removal of Earthly Deposits (Ord. ;36) Application Fee Annual License Fee Land Alteration $ 50.00 $ 50.00 Any Pit-No Processing less 250.00 250.00 than 500,000 cu. yds. Any operation with processing 500.00 500.00 or more than 500,000 cu. yds. Subd. 8 LIQUOR: Non-Intoxicating Malt Annual Liquors (Ord. #29) On-Sale 50.00 0ff-Sale 10.00 Liquor On-Sale/Off-Sal e Annual 7,500.00 Liquor On-Sale (clubs) Annual 100.00 (Ord. #158) Set-Ups (Ord. #76) Annual - Expires 200.00 June 30 �- . Ordinance No. 210 Page Four Terms and Type of License Conditions Fee Subd. 9 Peddlers (Ord. 1122) Annual — Evidence of $ 5.00 State License Subd. 10 Platting and Subdividing $25.00 plus $1.00 Land (Ord. 193) . for each lot Subd. 11 PUBLIC SERVICES: Public Dumps (Ord. 112) Expires 30th of June 100.00 following granting rantin of 1 i cense Refuse and Garbage Annual Collectors (Ord. t151) 1st Vehicle 30,00 Each additional vehicle 15.00 Scavengers (Ord. 1198) Annual 10.00 PERMITS Subd. 12 Building (Ord. 1/156) TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1.00 to $500.00 $5.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $5.00 for the first $500.00 pl us $1.00 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including S2,000.00, $2.001.00 to $25,000.00 $20.00 for the first $2,000,00 plus $3.00 for each additional thousand or fraction thereof, to and including S25,000.00. S25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $89.00 for the first $25.000.00 pl us S2.50 for each additional thousand or fraction thereof, to and including S50,000.00, $50.001.00 to $100,000.00 $151,50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $1.50 for each additional thousand or fraction thereof, to and including S100,000.00. Ordinance No. 210 Page Five • li PLAN CHECKING FEE An additional amount equal to one half (1/2) of the basic building permit fee. NOTE Valuations will be determined by the Village of Eden Prairie. Applicant should estimate plan check fee to be submitted with application on the basis of his declared value. Razing or Demolishing Buildings. The fee for a permit as required in Section 301 of 1970 Uniform Building Code shall be $25.00. Subd. 13 Excavation of Streets Engineers Approval 5.00 (Ord- 1119) Subd. 14 Heating and Ventilation (Ord. #200) A fee for the issuance of a permit for work and for making inspections pursuant to applicable ordinances shall be as set forth in the sections which follow, except as provided in the State Building Code. Single and Two Family Residences A. New Work }seat Only - $20.00 for first furnace or boiler. $10.00 for each additional furnace or boiler. Heat and Air Conditioner - $30.00 for first furnace and $20.00 for each additional. Replacements or Additions Addition of air conditioner units 20.00 per unit Furnace or boiler replacement - gas to gas, oil to oil 10.00 Furnace or boiler replacement - gas to oil, oil to gas 15.00 Addition on duct work or radiator pipe runs 10.00 All other repairs or replaceemnts 0- $500 cost or repair 7.50 Each additional $10O.00 or fraction thereof 1.00 (There will be no charge for the ventilation fans on single and two family units) B. Apartments Heating Only 10.E Heating and Central Air Conditioning 15.00 C. Commercial, Industrial and Multi-Family Mechanical Warm Air Systems. (Fan-coil units - gas fired units direct fired units). Ordinance No. 210 Page Six Duct Work Charge 0 to 120,000 BTU output 10.00 Each additional 60,000 BTU 3.00 (Charge for each unit) Ventilating System 1st Unit -to 2,000 CFN 8.00 Each additional 2,000 CFN 4.00 Each additional unit per 1,000 CFM 4.00 Electric Heat 1st 28 kilowatts (95,000 BTU) 10.00 Each additional 14 kilowatts (48,000 BTU) 3.00 Boilers pressure steam or low temperature hot water to 200° F. 0 to 150,000 BTU output 10.00 Each additional 75,000 BTU output 3.00 High pressure steam (over 151) or high temperature hot water (over 200 degrees) 0 to 150,000 BTU output 15.00 • Each additional 75,000 BTU output 5.00 Air Conditioning Systems 0to 5 tons 15.00 Each additional 2.5 ton 5.00 Heaters and Ventilators Unit-Heater, each unit 5.00 Cabinet Heater, each unit 5.00 Unit Ventilators 5.00 Infra-red Heaters 5.00 (gas takes this charge plus burner permit) Refrigeration Systems 3 Horse power or less 7.50 3 Horse power but not over 15 10.00 15 Horse power but not over 50 25.00 Excess of 50 Horse power 50.00 Ventilation of Fumes as to paint and dipping, mfg. ,etc. Up to 2.000 CFM 12.00 Each additional 1.000 CFM 5.00 Incinerators (Ord. 1151) 5.00 Moving a Building (Ord. 1176) 50.00 Ordinance No. 210 Page Seven • Subd. 15 Plumbing (Ord. #157) Fixtures - Each 2.00 Rough-In Fixtures 1.50 Setting Fixtures on Previous 1.50 Beer Dispenser (when connected with water supply) 1.50 Blow Off Basin 3.25 Catch Basin 3.25 Electric Water Heater 2.00 Hydraulic Valve 3.25 Manholes 5.00 New Ground Run for Existing Building 3.25 Rainwater Leader Up to 10 stories 3.25 Each additional 15 stories 3.25 Sump and Receiving Tank 3.25 Water Treating Device (Softener) 5.00 For extending Water Lines Up to 11/2" 3.00 Over 1e" 5.00 Automatic washer Refrigerator cut into water line Air conditioning Sprinkler system (fire or lawn) Sewage Disposal (Individual) (Ord. #34) 10.00 Stop Box Level Change -Minimum Charge 10.00 Municipal Sewer per 100 feet 5.00 Municipal Water per 100 feet 5.00 Excavating and Abandonment 10.00 Inside Water Inspection 5.00 Change Over ($5.00 inside + $5.00 outside) 10.00 Water Turn On or Off By Village (after initial turn on) 5.00 Taps 3/4" $11.00 1" $14.00 Road Repair Gravel $10.00 per 2 x 4 hole Black Top 30.00 per 2 x 4 hole Concrete 40.00 per 2 x 4 hole For 3 Openings on Gas Up to 2" 2.00 Each additional opening .75 Over 2" 5.00 Each additional opening .75 Gas Stove 3.00 Hot Water Heater, Up to 99,000 BTU 3.00 Gas Lite 3.00 Bar-BQ 3.00 Incinerator 3.00 Minimum Permit Fee except Hot Water Heaters 5.00 Ordinance No. 210 Page Eight Gas Stoves, Ranges, Etc. For any permit for installing gas stoves, gas dryers, ranges, gas water heaters, process gas burners, or other similar gas burning devices not used in connection with a heating system, the fee charged shall be as follows for each such device included in such permit. Input Not exceeding 99,000 BTU 3.00 100,000 BTU but not exceeding 199,000 BTU 5.00 200,000 BTU but not exceeding 399,000 BTU 10.00 400,000 BTU but not exceeding 599,000 BTU 20.00 600,000 BTU but not exceeding 999,000 BTU 30.00 For inputs exceeding 999,000 BTU the fee shall be as provided in this Chapter for gas burners for use in connection with a heating system, which fee shall be in addition to the fee charged as above provided, for the installation of any gas piping for said devices and for any other gas fitting work, if any, included in said permit. Gas Burners For any permit for the installation of a gas burner and its equipment, for use in connection with a heating system, the fees shall be as follows: Input Not exceeding 199,000 BTU 5.00 200,000 BTU but not exceeding 399,000 BTU 10.00 400,000 BTU but not exceeding 599,000 BTU 20.00 600,000 BTU but not exceeding 999,000 BTU 30.00 1,000,000 BTU but not exceeding 2,499,000 BTU 57.50 2,500,000 BTU but not exceeding 9,999,000 BTU 69.00 10,000,000 BTU but not exceeding 49,999,000 BTU 92.00 50,000,000 BTU but not exceeding 74,999,000 BTU 115.00 75,000,000 BTU and over 172.50 Where more than one gas burner or multiple gas burners are to be installed in a single boiler, furnace or other device they shall, for the purpose of establishing permit fees therefore, be consid- ered as a single burner. The above fees shall be in addition to the fee charged for the permit for the installation of any gas piping for said burners or equipment. For any permit for alterations or repairs to any existing gas burners or gas burner equipment where the cost of such proposed work does not exceed $100, the fee shall be $5.00. For each additional $100 or fraction thereof, in the cost of such proposed work, $1.50 shall be added to the above prescribed fee for such permit. Re-Inspection due to negligence or error of permmittee 5.00 Ordinance No. 210 Page Nine Fees for Permits Appl led for After Commencement of Work. Any and all permits and permit fees therefor required shall be applied for and paid prior to commencement of any work or installation requiring any permit. Any application for any permit required which is made after the commencement of any work or other installation shall be accompanied by the appro- priate forth in said Ordinance multiplied bytwo. fee set P Subd. 16 Signs (Ord. #84) Up to 33 sq. ft. insize - - - - - - - - - $ 12.00 per year 33 sq.ft. through 60 sq.ft. in size - -- $ 15.00 per year (Up) 61 sq. ft. to 100 sq. ft. in size -- $ 18.00 per year Each additional 100 sq. ft. or portion thereof not exceeding 300 sq. ft. Additional - - - - - - - - -- $ 2.00 per year Each additional 100 sq. ft.or portion thereof over a total of 400 so. ft. Additional - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - $ 2.50 per year Directional Signs for Housing Projects (2.50 1/2) - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - $ 5.00 per year Temporary Sign -Up to 10 sq. ft. - - - - $ 3.00 30 days • Over 10 sq. ft. - - - - - $ 5.00 30 days Fees shall not be pro-rated for a period of time less than shown. The surfaces of double or multifaced signs shall be combined for the purpose of determining the amount of the fee. Subd. 17 Water Softening and Filtering (Ord. #201) 5.00 Subd. 18 Wells (Ord. #43) 10.00 { First read at a regular meeting of the Council of the Village of Eden Prairie. this 13th day of February and finally read. adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of said Village on the day of . 1973. Paul R. Redpath. Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Dina M. Holagren. Clerk • • _ Kr • VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO, 225 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135 EDENVALE :4th ADDITION The Council of the Village of Eden Prairie does ordain as follows: Section'1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to Section 10, Township 116, Range 22 as follows: Located on Outlot C, Edenvale 4th Addition in the NW 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 10, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota. POD to OFC The first reading was held at a regular meeting of the Council' of the Village of Eden Prairie, this 26th day of June and finally read, adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of said Village on the 10th day of July, 1973. Paul R. Redpath, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, Clerk • w w . o June 13, 1973 > w Village of Eden Prairie ° 8950 County Road 4 Eden Prairie, tti nnesota 55343 cc RE: Amendment to Proposal-Agreement dated June 26, 1972 z and Proposal-Agreement Extension dated October 10, 1972. Gentlemen: • This letter will serve, if approved, as a supplemental w agreement between the Village of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, herein referred to as the OWNER, and Brauer 5 Associates, Inc., herein referred to as the CONSULTANT. U The following modifications, revisions and additions are a hereby made to the above referenced a9 reem?nts: a 1. Delete Item No. 2(a ) of the Proposal-Agreement Extension and substitute the following: a. Re view existing design criteria established for ° the connecting portion of the Parkway east: of T.H. 169. cc b. Review existing site conditions including topograplt,y, drainage , soils , vegetation, habitat, etc. Q. c. Study and eval uate two basic alternate routes for ci alignment , grade, drainage requirements, access, environmental impact, etc. V1 d. Review findings with the Village Staff to produce an approved layout. U i2 Refine the approved layout us ing design criteria establishe4 by—Eli-Village Engineer to produce a ai final alignment and grade. cc QThe CONSULTANT shall furnish reproducible plan/profile a sheets at a scale of 1" = 100 ', and a reproducible layout plan at a scale of 1" = 100' or 1" = 200' indicating suggested scenic easement acquisitions if des ired. 6440 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55343 (612)941.1660 111 400 Sibley Street, St.Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612) 222-3701 1050 Wadsworth Boulevard, Lakewood,Colorado 80215 (303) 236.7363 2 • • Village of Eden Prairie -2- June 13, 1973 2. For the purposes of this Amendment only, the fee for completi on of item 1. above shall be a lump sum in the amount of NINE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS 09,200.00). 3. The OWNER shall provide topography of the project site at a scale of 1" = 100 ' (2' contour intervals ; soil borings as required for design evaluations; and other data pertinent to the project. 4. Further design development, working drawings and specifications necessary for construction of the Parkway shall be performed at a fee negotiated with the OWNER. All other items (A-4; B-2 to B-7; C-2 to C-9; and D, E, F) of the original Proposal Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, .the OWNER and .the PLANNER have made and executed thLe Agneemen.t, Thio day ob , 1913. OWNER: VILLAGE OF EVEN PRAIRIE Eden Pxa•in.Le, Minnesota In Pneeence o6: by and CONSULTANT: BRAUER 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Eden PK4.i.n.i.e, Minnesota In Pneee ee og: by Denn.ca K. 444een., P. . .Vice PKee.ident, Eng.c.nee.ning jab . l CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST JULY 10, 1973 PLUMBING Direct Hone Plumbing '— Hovde Plumbing & Heating Swanson &Schiager Ries Plumbing & Heating HEATING AND VENTILATING Frank's Heating E Sheet Metal Hovde Plumbing & Heating UTILITY SERVICE INSTALLER Swanson &Schiager Kusske Construction Inc. Cris Construction Co. Inc. CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Ron Jon Builders Inc. Wyman Builders Inc. Harold Swanson Builders GAS FITTER B Swanson &Schiager PRIVATE KENNEL Lyla M. Douglass SET-UP—LICENSE Edenvale Golf Club These licenses have been approved by the program head responsible for the licensed activity. n D. Fr e, erk F/ys • VLLLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE FINANCIAL REPORT JULY 10, 1973 Cash Balances: General and Special. Revenue Funds $ 394,085 Capital Projects (Improvements) (782,732) Park Acquisition and Development 163,973 Debt Service Funds 1,126,874 Utility Funds 74,768 As of 6/30/73 $ 976,968 Disposition of Cash: Repurchase Agreements* $ 490,000 Certificates of Deposit 300,000 Cash in Bank (per book) 12,885 Government Securities 174,083 $ 976.968 Expenditures presented for approval at the Council Pleeting. of July 10, 1973 total $762,981.06. These expenditures will be met by the following sources of funds: Cash in Bank 7/6/73 $ 20,311 Certificate of Deposit 300,000 Repurchase Agreements 442,670 $ 762,981 *Repurchase Agreements are investments at a bank secured by U.S. Government Securities. They are used when the in— vestment is less than 30 days and pay 7 1/4% , 30 day Certi— ficate of Deposits are paying 8 1/22. VI B �, �° i '1! • @ I ''yy.4� me-4 12m, �OA•D RzoJgcT 7/chz i �'" 'STIMl�TF_o_�s�E55MEur Pl.CTES : 0 1 rlr'" . -Z. .0Tp‘i____P 4FAT- 4SIS_- - ---- --- - --A;-A-,-I-tom- ---1 -5--- 4--PA:w,*k -- - i i 70i01 1�Atill- 94J1- --P. - ► 5$ l 67 H FA.:«,P F G/ssJr, 1 !: 439 Z00� 9 149� 9 1 j i 1..1,11__ _-1,1-4A.4.imi rT 8 49 Z. ki-V1 (D / I . V . • G, u +_T -.J"- _lac_. ; J-k--CAtar J.14, .1A414,42ei 1 CVj_L13 11-1 11SD x 34375# ' a142))1150� I — — --- Tea. — .:: Me.A . i-'_Rum — _ _ — [Z:,yr.01 sop___3$.5 .k, ' 550c17731 tr925—tit_%% j IJ� 6 s k. 1 B 414. b 1. 09 r l ---�-lS,e?_ 0 i ._ V_.�> ��� � It .�% �- , = i �� ��}Z•4_ 4c9 I�. �* _ SBA `b7_S _ 1+a93._. y iRo__ vi.I O tiLd. -i',,,,-.1.0i,s zoo _q:71 ' -_. 17_071212------;,-01-$----2,0 2 )40Ar. 64,1). - - _19,3 $0 A.,1_ __;,L pi.,1P-2- mi______7;54:00 ,��. �:,,� - - _ (�C,.9 __300.4 3 2Da�_t2S� V24—L. 3.oa z 1 217 100 C. 71 0 M I i�z►-� 6 23,zns k4 F•w.-Fa \0-71 Z r---� .1w:tiff - -4ihm..S4Arei •-____14_40_4;),..412.4.40#t) $x9 So 2$4_1 7,1)4c.Pa.-414. okr:- zsf, q- mil 13-1A- 6/44e/pui P - • /71 is • — r\' T =5 .. *9So /.A ;____ ______ -...1.1144.4..u. 41,1%.644. _ , P4 adoEi -/A2- _tvw./siut 4314 276_3o4 ____,14 .2.__13-0-)4_34-4 A.44.44,,,,4,-77- 4-°6-9,--s7&) - -- 4/50-x __altn 5_. 1 1 Nt- 2 019,979 n �430 — S'skeL-OLDAW_44.a 100_. 4 ,- 3 2S .. NALI 44 lor)_ 30