HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 06/26/1973 e . .
0 I
Y EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL,
TUESDAY, NNE 26, 1973 7:30 P.M., Village Hall
INVOCATION - - - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — -- ROLL CALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, Joan Meyers, John McCu h
Wolfgang Fenzel, Roger Boerger.
COUNCIL STAFF: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich,. illage Attorney
Harlan Perbix,Clerk John Frans.j
AGENDA
I. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD NNE 12, )973.
r
II. SALE OF $2,500,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER AND BONDS,
•
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 725 authorizing the sale of$2,500,000
General Obligation Sewer and ,Vater Bonds to for
$ at a net interest rate of %. (Bond bids will be
opened at 7 p.m., Tuesday, June 26, 1973)
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. public hearing reviewing the proposed Major Center Area Planned Unit
pevelopment (MCA-PUD), approximately 1,000 acre area located in all
four quadrants of the 1-494 and 2)2 interchange . (Attached)
Action: Final action on the Major Center Area Planned Unit Development is
anticipated to occur at the regular July 10, 1973, meeting of the
Village Council.
B. Presentation of final feasibility report and preli urinary hearing on the Ring
Road Project STR 72-9-26, (Attached)
Action: Notion adopting Resolution No. 726 receiving final feasibility report
on Ring Road Project SIR 72-9-26 and calling for a public hearing on
July 11, 1973, at 7:30 p.m.
C. ;denwest Office But iding by the Oak Manor Corp. located across the street
from Fairway ',Afoods Condominiums. Request rezoning of approximately
3.8 acres from P.U.D. to O.F.C. (Attached)
Action: First reading of Ordinance #225 for Edenwe st Office Building rezoning
approximately 3.9 acres from P.U.D. to O .F.C.
D. fairway Woods Condominium and Townhouse Project, 2nd Phase, in
Ed ,envale review of development stage application for townhouses and
condominium units.
Action: Approve revised development stags within original zoning classifi-
cation.
r. ,
Council Agenda -2 - Tune 26, 1973
IV. PET1IONS, REMESTS&COMMUNICATIONS
I.. A, Petition from G.M. Carter, Jr., President, The Preserve, dated May 16,
1973 requesting removal of 42 acres (Moorings) from Village tax rolls.
(Attached)
Action: Refer to Village Manager for Study and recommendation.
B. Letter from H.O. Kiossner, Hennepin County Engineer, dated June 13,
1973, concerning CSAH 4 (speed survey& flasher). (Attached)
Action: Receive and file.
C. Letter from Village of Burnsville concerning legal costs in challenge of
Fiscal Disparities Bill. (Attached)
Action: Authorize expenditure of $1,00 0_00 from the General Fund Contin-
gency appropriation to assist the Village of Burnsville in defending
the State's appeal on the District Court's ruling on the Fiscal
Disparities Act.
D. Letter from George M. Hansen Company (I. Gregory Murphy) dated
April 18, 1973, concerning suggestions for control of internal operations.
(Attached)
Action: Invite repre sentative of the Village auditing firm to a Work Session
meeting to discuss their audit and the 1972 financial report.
E. Petition from Warren Shultz for sanitary sewer trunk extension. (attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 727 receiving petition from Warren
Shultz and approving Change Order No. 3 to Improvement Contract
51-243 with 0rfei & Sons Inc. on a unit price basis for trunk sewer
extension on Co. Rd. 4 from Park Terrace Drive to approximately
300' north at an estimated cost of$6,200.00. Said sewer extension
to be described as Project FAN 73-7-19.
F, Petition from Lochanbum Addition residents for sanitary sewer and water
laterals. (Attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 728 receiving petition.from
Lochanbum Addition residents and ordering preparation of a report
on Projects fAN 73-1-21 and .VTR 73-2-21.
V. RESOLUTIONS i OR DINANCES,:
A. Second reading of Ordinance No. 213, an ordinance amending Ordinance
No. 135, reclassifying 87.75 acres of the total Homart site of approxi-
mately 117 acres to C-Regional Commercial. (copy of zoning sketch and
legal description is attached).
Action: Motion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No_ 213.
Council Agenda — 3- Tune 26, 1973
V. RESOLUT EONS & ORDINANCES (CONT.)
B. Second Reading of Ordinance#224 approving reclassification to R1-22
for Alex Dorenkemper's Maplewood Park Estates' Crestwood Terrace.
Action: Notion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No. 224.
V1. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS,AND COMM(E DNS:
A. Beport of Councilman Penzel on the activities of the South Hennepin
Human Services Board. (Request to appear before Village Council on
July 24, 1973, meeting for brief presentation.
Action:
B. Memo from Robert Williams. Chairman. Human Rights Commission,
supporting the references to housing contained in the proposed Major
Center Area Planned Unit Development. (Attached)
Action: Receive and file.
C. Reports of Village Engineer:
1. Approve final plat of The Trails 2nd Addition . (Attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 729 approving final plat of
The Trails 2nd Addition.
2. Consider street lighting contfact with Northern States Power Co.
(Attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 730 approving Street Lighting
Contract with Northern States Power Co.dated Tune 26, 1973.
D. Village Clerk's Report:
Village Clerk's Recommended License Application List. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving License Application List.
E. Reports of Village Manager:
1. Request authorization to rent the Village-owned cottage on the
north end of Staring Lake (formerly Blest property) for living space
for Eden Prairie Coordinator of Community Education at the monthly
rental rate of$140.00.
Action: Authorize Village Manager to rent cottage at the rate of 9140
per month.
2. Request authorization to increase compensation of the Village
Planner in the amount of.S50.pe{month effective July 1, 1973.
Action: Authorize an increase of$50 per month effective 7/1/73.
If f•
Council Agenda -4- June 26, 1973
E. Beports of Village Manager(contt)
3, Discussion of City of Minnetonka's proposed Community Develop-
ment Guide Plan.
Action:
VII. FINANCES:
A. Payment of Claims No. 2127 through 2176. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving payment of Claims No. 2127 through 2176.
VIII. ADTOURNMENT.
fijati,._
RESOLUTION NO. 726
•
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING
FOR HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, a report has been given by the Village Engineer
through Mr. James Murphy, P.E. of Howard Needles Tanner& Bergendorf to the
Village Council on June 26, 1973, recomending the following improvement to
wit:
PROJECT STR 72-9-26, Construction of the Major Center Area
Ring Road. including grading, concrete curb and gutter,
sidewalks, surfacing, lighting, signals, landscaping, turf
estabi ishment, bridges, ramps, underpass, stone sewer
facilities, miscellaneous sanitary sewer and watermain ex-
tensions and appurtenant construction.
NOV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in
accordance with the report and the assessment of property
abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion
costof the of 11iaesatul� . Sect.
429.011o429.1 , t an timatedtotacostof the
improvement as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improve-
ment on the llth day of July, 1973, at the Eden Prairie
Village Hall at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The Village Council
shall give published notice of such hearing and improvement
as required by law.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on
Paul R. Redpath. Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
• John O. Frans. Clerk
r . . .l
813
VOWS'OFFICES 111S0 EDEN NAME ROAD / EOM PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 555/2/TELEPRIONE R1121 941•2212 ^
acJa
prairie
€,- NOTICE OF PRELIMINARY PIMBLIC HEARING
ON 111E MAJOR CENTER AREA RING ROAD
PROJECT STR 72-9-26
Notice is hereby given that the Eden Prairie Village Council will hold a pre-
liminary public hearing at 9:00 P.M. on Tuesday, June 26, 1973 at the Village
Hall for discussion of the proposed Major Center Area Ring Road. This dis-
cussion will follow the public hearing for the Major Center Area Planned Unit
.R ( Development.
John D. Franc
Village Clerk
• VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF HEARING
ON MAJOR CENTER AREA RING ROAD
PROJECT STR 72-9-26
Notice is hereby given that the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie
will meet at the Eden Prairie Village Hall, 8950 Eden Prairie Road (Co. Road 4)
at 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday, July 11, 1973 to consider making of the following
described improvements:
Construction of the Major Center Area Ring Road, including
grading, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, surfacing,
lighting, signals, landscaping, turf establishment, bridges,
ramps, underpass, storm sewer facilities, miscellaneous
sanitary sewer and watermain extensions and appurtenant con-
struction. Project STR 72-9-26.
Total Estimated Cost a 810,000,000.
Pursuant to MSA Section 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed
for such improvements is within Sections 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 23 and 24
of Township 116, Range 22. Written or oral comments relating to these improve-
ments will be received at this meeting.
John Frane
Village Clerk
Village of Eden Prairie
Publ ished in Eden Prairie-Minnetonka
Sun on June 28 and July 5, 1973.
(It
1313 Ens t High wa 13 • Burnsville, Minnesota 55378
Y �
June 6, 1973 (j ` °3. •
Mr. Robert Heinrich, Manager
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Bob:
As you are well aware, the Fiscal Disparities Bill which Burnsville
challenged in the District Court in Hastings was declared uncon-
stitutional by the District Judge. Please find enclosed a copy
of that decision.
This decision by the District Judge has been appealed and will be
heard by the Supreme Court...I presume. . .sometime in the fall. We
here in Burnsville had hoped that the decision would not be appealed,
and further, we did have our Representative, Bradley Pieper, intro—
duce a bill which would have removed this statute from the books
completely. This bill was not approved in the legislature.
I am corresponding with you at this time in the hopes that your
community would see fit to help us defray some of the costs which
we have incurred in the District Court case, and which we will
further incur on the Supreme Court appeal. The Village cost through
the District Court hearing was approximately $7,500.00. In addition
to that amount we are anticipating our cost for the appeal will run
in the vicinity of $2,500.00. Up to this writing we have received
contributions from two communities in the amount of $1,000.00 each,
and we are hoping that you would see fit to add your contribution.
Thank you for your consideration, and should you feel the need, I
would be glad to personally discuss this request with you.
Sincerely yours,
e0 OF BUPNSVILLE
40/4111r/i1Cx-1......-0
PJM/res • rick J. McInnis,
encl.: Court Decision Manager
Resolution No. 946
supporting House File #498
1
RESOLUTION NO. 727
•
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, Mr. Warren Schultz, owner of the property described
as RLS No. 664 has petitioned the Village Council for extension of sanitary
sewer along County Road 4 from Park Terrace Drive to approximately 300 feet
north (Project SAN 73-7-19), and
WHEREAS, the Village Engineer recamends that this sewer extension
should be considered as part of the Village's Trunk Sanitary Seller System be-
cause of oversizing and extra depth required to serve many additional properties
to the north and should be constructed and financed accordingly, and
WHEREAS, funding for this sewer extension project,to be known
as Project SAN 73-7-19 is available from the Village's Sewer and Water Trunk
Construction Fund per the Village Finance Director.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF EOEN PRAIRIE:
Project SAN 73-7-19 as above described shall be constructed
according to approved plans and specifications as prepared
by Rieke, Carroll, Muller Assoc. , Inc. and shall be added,
on a unit price basis to Improveement Contract 51-243 with
Orfei & Sons, Inc. as Change Order#3 at an estimated con-
tract cost of $6,200.00.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on
Paul R. liedpath, Mayor
ATTEST: SE'
John D. Frame, Clerk // V
• Warren Shultz
8000 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie,Minn.55343
612/941-1078
May 23,1973
Mr. Carl Jullie,Village Engineer
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie,Minneso8* 55343
Dear Sir;
Please accept this letter as a request for an
extension of the trunk sanitary sewer service
from the present manhole at Park Terrace Drive
and County Road 4,North to serve the lateral
sewer line which we intend to installi RIBS
• 664.
It is my understanding that the trunk water
main is in place along County Read 4 th a
point at the intersection of Kurtz Lane.
If possible we intend to install the lateral
during the present construct ion season.
Thank you for your consideration,
.nce rely, f
ti
Warren Shhuul(ta
/ :-. iviiiiki,00,111„.„- . igloo, , iar-...1=11,. ..0. 7. ...._ 1
,:.,-.:.. .*p...47:16.00....1 .:......: 11,01 \ 1,m. .. .... _.,
: ,•
,,,, - .404voli..... •.. 4,-,.....:•10 .7 .:__-_.. ni 4,47 ...,,, • , L, . ,
410 -: L�
4• ' I-
, LI fi rir,,,f:4441 ililiri I I 14111,21 r I . - . . ''-' 4 WiV. .- L :: 1.,::.t 'j .'VI, ---..-'I. * ': .'.''..: :
, sulm A.M.` 0 - . or .. ''‘. . Tr ill%) ' . .
\ti SCHOOL 01lT >l 7=. '
, . 1). .
1 IA4 30 1 11 1111r --
.,y-..-pi .�
,.c. MY p/R1I rlL+tMN /
d
fl
RESOLUTION N0: 728
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION
OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS
b1*EREAS, it is proposed to in ve: ,
PROJEC SAN 73-1-21 and WTR 73-2-21 Ty Sexier and Watermain service
to the L turn-Addition a ent areas.
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement,. pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE
COUNCIL: - • - - '
That the proposed improvements be referred to the Village
Engineer for study with the assistance of Rieke. Carroll.Muller Assoc.. Inc.
and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the Village
Council with all convenient speed. advising the Council in a preliminary
way as to the scope, cost, assessment and feasibility of the proposed improve-
ments.
ADOPTED by the Village Council
Paul R. Redpath,Nayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John 0. Frane,Clerk
15r
, . . .....
al' 7 2 t-i-tr-r-.=.0,v Ss 4 N a-40,s-
,..... . • 2519:944Vd• .....
I Inc/ST 1170 ....
I iT431 40 I .. :4Z , 14 it.1 r a 1
. if • II -4.- t- ••44 6 Ilkt4 1 Ni
4 *vb 55 -: I •:,- ° • 1 . 4: 5 - I 4 . 2 1 ,..lz Z/
,i
i ..- 01
i II _
0
''' 2. s. our i
_
4i40 up -
no' tie
1.1
2 ''..•-.- •
1., .. .4 ' ''''.1 itt.4‘a HARROGATE
• . ottr - •
• . .- , tr4T 414.
a.
4
-
I: -'-' kr.0 1
• , ---• 14 t* , z , /04. ..., •
.- ,„ • ‘t -"" firm .
O. „." s • - A ... ;04 15. _
2
"II% ..,,,• ••,,
• r% , • ,,
- ,•:,- 7 , •••• Ilr• . - A
os •,t
o,
em. 1.
t "i ....
• a. 44 1 4
4 4
• • './..., .. . , 41
• e 5 .•
.... y 100 ‘4.8 0.4 A,.4 , • , :k t
t , 1
4" ' to ii
‘ft
ft, ,4.-
C
'
tl •;..5'..46". ...i",.Z 04,
il , •
6 ••.
9 */ '' i. *' I •.
' •
• .,. #s 4. Ze
4,
c 1 L41 0) • • 8 •-•...41. %. Azr
3 • vi4
w 44'4
t 1
1. S •
.c j
C3CR ,„„‹,,,,,- ,..•...,.........0.3471"11-....-— •-
4 • , IA
NJ "
i• --......... .
454/0) = "....
•
...I.E.Ke rinedy
6
• ''
. • '...,.
•
a
.... .
_ . .
SI 0 200) -
lio • • •
• . .
-4•44-44-€f?:.1,a e 1:8 ...' ....:'44.,-..),
4—,3_7 3 •
•
• VILLAGE OF" EDEN PRAIRIE
PETITION FOR LOCAL"IMPROVEMENT
To the Council of the Village of Eden Prairie:
The ii dornigtend, being prcpcety o:-^ors in the Village of Eden Prairie
' interested in the following dencribed i:nproveaent, do hereby petition for
SA4'iTMy Sc t L IAr6-i
in the following location: LO GLIA,t/RtRN 1;01)h r/n r,J IN F.Di e'p/fAiAie
•
1
and that the total cost thereof be assessed against property benefited byithe „w L+�.4`��
improvement , ,,. ... .
. Each petitioner waives all notice required by law before construction or
installation of said improvement, end _u.ther waives all notice required by law
prior to asseosing the lane o: potitieaor for beasiits so said Ian.. beca.asn of
such inprove,nent.
NNES.OF PETITTO:1EILS ,
r1 ' LEGAL DESCItIP Tlla OF PPA?ERTY OWNED BY PETITIONERS
i/ o• < Choi T/a a .-°
. -4i1f1.- '
�./lam i
g i 6 6z
L-1,3-'7 3
VILLAGE OFEDN PRAIRIE
PETITION FOR LOCAL'IMPROVEMENT
To the Council of the Village of Edon Prairie:
The undarnignsd, being prcpcaty owners in the Village of Eden Prairie
interested in thn folio:tng described improvement. do hereby petition for
Ski.TA )1 Sew&A + 1.411:1TE:R
in the following location: &oc.44WAutd ADD► Mori j N EDE•✓ PRAIR/r
•
l •
and that the total cost thereof be assessed against property benefited by the
improvement.
Each petitioner waives all notice required by law before construction or
installation of said improvement, and further waives all notice required by law
prior to assessing the land of petitioner for benefits to said land because of
such improvaonnt.
NAMES'0F PETITIONERS LEGAL DESCRIFTL I OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PETITIONERS
L ?� 6 78/
d2 •
-
6 7•
•
�;Gym /�- - -�
• • 440 e
0:03o c ee.A.A,6yZL
TO THE HERS OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL NW THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
On behalf of the members of the Human Rights Commission, I would like to commend
the people who participated in the Major Center Area Task Force. The fine and
.thorough job they did is reflected in the IM.C.A. report itself.
' A section of the report on land use is of specific interest to the members of this
Commission. This particular item is concerned with housing types and opportunities
within the M.C.A. area. "The principle of economic integration in a amenity".
says the report. "will also apply to the M.C.A. -Housing shoul d be mixed within
projects and structures, if at all possible,to provide for a wide range of income
levels". This reaffirmation of long standing Village policy is com endable, and we
would ask that in adopting any P.U.D. for the M.C.A. that this philosophy be made
an explicit part of any 'super" P.U.O.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Vmo truly yours
pLet v.tAti....tz,
Robert K. Williams. Chairman, Human Rights Commission
j
r'
• VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 729
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL
PLAT OF THE TRAILS 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of The Trails 2nd Addition has been submitted
in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code
and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the Village
plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and ordinances of the Village of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for The Trails 2nd Addition is
approved upon ccmpl lance with the recommendation of the
Village Engineer's Report on this plat dated 6/21/73.
B. Variance is herein granted from Village Ordinance No. 93,
Sec. 8, Subd. 1 waiving the six month maxima time elapse
between the approval date of the preliminary plat and
filing of the final plat as described in said Engineer's
Report.
C. That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified
copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of
Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required
by NSA 462.358, Subd.. 3.
D. That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to supply a
certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers
of the above named plat.
E. That the Mayor and Village Manager are hereby authorized to
Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the Village
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on
Paul.R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL.
John D. Frane, Clerk �`/ L
I~ r
VILLAGE OF EDE 1 PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT.ON FINAL PLAT
TOs Mayor and Village Council
FROM: Carl Jullie, Village Engineer
THROUGH: Robert Heinrich, Manager
SUBJECT: THE TRAILS 2NO ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The owner, Hirsch Development Corporation is requesting Village
Council approval of the final plat of "The Trails 2nd Addition".
This is a multiple-family residential plat (RM 2.5) located at
E-M Parkway and Neill Lake Road within The Preserve. It is
usual procedure with townhouse plats to construct the buildings
prior to final platting so that precise surveying data can be
obtained for the final plat; however, in this case the developer
is requesting the reverse procedure because of mortgage require-
ments. As a result, very careful surveying will be necessary
to locate the building according to the plat dimensions.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat of The Trails 2nd Addition was approved by
the Village Council on October 24, 1972 per Resolution No. 601.
Zoning to RN 2.5 was finally read and adopted on November 14,
1972 per Ordinance No. 191.
The final plat now submitted for approval conforms to the approved
prel iminary plat.
VARIANCES: A variance from Village Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1 will be
necessary waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
plat. This variance request is reasonable because the staff
agrees that no changes from the approved preliminary plat are
necessary.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
All utilities and streets within the plat will be constructed
according to Village standards but will be privately owned and
maintained.
.0..
Engineering Report - The Trails 2nd Addition
Page 2'
PARK DEDICATION:
There will be no land dedication for park purposes within thispla r--
and . The thereare currentnegotiations withils 2nd Addition is ThePreserve The owners
concerning park dedication requirements for the entire P.U.D.
area.
A 15' wide utility easement across the north end of the plat
will be utilized for trailway purposes. The developer should
submit a letter agreeing to this use.
BONDING: Since all streets and utilities are on-site (private) no bonding
will be required.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Recommend approval of THE TRAILS 2ND ADDITION final plat subject
to the following:
1- Receipt from the developer of written acknowledgement of the
Village's intent to use the 15' sewer easement for trailway
purposes.
2. Receipt of fee for Village administrative costs in the amount
of $1,350.00.
3- Council approval of a variance waiving the six month require-
ment of Sec. 8, Subd. 1 of Ordinance No. 93.
Res��+C subaitted,
Carl J. Ju e, P.E.
Village Engineer
CJJ:jr
RESOLUTION NO. 730
RESOLVED that the Village Council of the Village of Eden
Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby accepts the proposal of the
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMWPANY, A Minnesota corporation, to furnish street
lighting service will all lights located or to be located in said Village,
and hereby approves all rates, terms,conditioms, and specifications in the
Street Lighting Contract made a part of the proposal of said company, and the
proper officers of the Vi llage are hereby authorized and directed to execute
the aforesaid Contract for and in the name of the Village, and to affix the
corporate seal thereto.
I
; I
ADOPTED by the Village Council on
IF
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
FORM IMLUae 17.711 Rate Schedule A
To Street Lighting Contract Dated
• OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING
(Company Owned)
AVAILABILITY:Available be year-sound illusinatiom of public streets, parkways, and highways by elec-
tric lamps In luminaires supported on wood poles, eehere the facilities for this service are furnished by
Company.
RATE:
Number of Homehly
Lamps per Rate per
Designation of Lamps Luminaire Luminaire
175 watt Mercury Vapor 1 3.95
250 watt Mercury Vapor 1 4.90
SERVICE INCLUDED IN PATE:Company shall own, operate, and maintain the Overhead Street Lighting
spates using Company's standard street lighting equipment.
DAILY OPERATING SCHEDULE: The daily operating schedule of the above lamps shall be hoe appmr
Isastely one-half hour after sunset until one-half hour before sunrise.
OUTAGES If illumination from any lamp is interrupted and said illwainadon is not resumed within 24
borers fro,die time Camgpay receives notice thereof from Custom, 1/30 of the monthly rate for such
lamp shall be deducted for each night of nonilluaination after such notice Is received.
Date
Supersedes Rate Schedule A Dated loft
DORY In-105917.711 STREET LIGHTING CON TRACT
. , .1
THIS CONTRACT,dated ,19_,between NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY,
a Minnesota Corporation,hereinafter called"Company,"and the Village of Eden Prairie ,
a municipal corporation of Hennepin County,in the State of Minnesota hereinafter called
"Customer,"
WITNESSETH:That the parties hereto,each in consideration of the agreements of the other, agree as follows:
1. KIND OF SERVICE: Company agrees to supply Customer with illumination or service as designated in the Rate
Schedule(s) A attached hereto and made a part of this contract from facilities located as shows m
Exhibit(,) A attached.
2. CHANGES AND ADDITIONS: When requested by Cusoomet and pursuant to the additional conditions on the reverse
hereof, Company will provide additional street lights. When there is a major change in the number, size,or type of
light source, or at least once each calendar year when there hive been changes in service,Company will prepare re.
vised or new exhibits. Such revised or new exhibits shall be considered incorporated herein when die parties have
caused said exhibits to be executed. In the event additional sizes or types of street lights are available from Company
and desired by Customer, die applicable Rate Schedule shall be expanded to include these additional lights and their
respective rates.
3. TERMS: This contract shall be in force for a period of 5 years commencing on ,19 ,
and shall continue in force thereafter for periods of 5 years unless terminated by written notice of cancellation gives
by either party to the other not less than 30 days prior to die expiration of any of said 5 year periods, provided tins is
no event shall this Contract be extended beyond the period for which Customer may legally bind itself.
4. PAYMENT OF BILLS: All bills are payable at Company's office on or before the thirtieth day succeeding the date
bill is rendered.
5. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS: The Customer agrees to accept and pay for such service is accordance with the rates,
rules,and regulations of the Company in effect from time to time for this class of service. Rates presently in effect for
services hereunder are shown in die attached rate schedules. Service hereunder shall be supplied for Customer's use
subject to agreements contained herein and in the"Additional Conditions"shown on the reverse hereof and made a part
of this Contract.
6. TERMINATION OF PRIOR CONTRACTS:It is agreed that,on the effective date hereof,this Contract terminates all
prior contracts covering street lighting service furnished hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this contract oo be duly executed.
In presence of NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
By
And
Witnesses As To Company
Village of Eden Prairie
By-- I
Maass_ .Witnesses As To Customer
CLERK'S LICENSE APLLICATION LIST
JUNE 26, 1973
SET—UP LICENSE
Dutch's Resort
CONTRACTORS (1 6 2 Family)
Oertel Construction Co_, Inc.
Lemancik Building Remodeling, Inc.
Aladdin Pools, Inc.
PLUMBING
Mound Plumbing Co.
GAS FITTER
E. S. P., Inc.
These licenses have been approved by the program head responsible for
the licensed activity.
n . ne, erk
JDF/ys
A
1
•
ecJe , prairie
MAJOR CEMTEEA
task force reportune,73`
MAJOR CENTER AREA TASK FORCE PARTICIPANTS
•
Chairman, Richard Putnam, Eden Prairie Village Planner
Secretary, Marty Jessen, Eden Prairie Director of Parks and Recreation
Environmental Sub—Committee Fiscal Sub-Committee
Marty Jessen, Chairman Bob Heinrich, Chairman,Eden Prairie Mgr.
Fran Blacklock, Eden Prairie resident Joan Meyers, Eden Prairie Councilwoman
Al Gebhard, Barr Engineering Company Wolf Fenzel, Eden Prairie Councilman
John Dickson, Barr Engineering Company Don Peterson,Eden Land Corporation
Don Hess, The Preserve Lee Johnson, The Preserve
Charleen Beltt, Barton-Aschman Assoc. Evelyn Larson, Metropolitan Council
Norma Schee, Chairman, Planning Comm. John Frane, Eden Prairie Finance Director
Dick Putnam, Eden Prairie Planner Ken Chambers, Eden Prairie Assessor
Les Blacklock, Citizen, Naturalist Dick Putnam, Eden Prairie Planner
Land Use Sub-Committee Transportation Sub-Committee
Dick Putnam, Chairman Larry Dallam, Chairman, Howard Needles
Don Hess, The Preserve Tammen& Bergendoff
Joan Meyers, Eden Prairie Councilwoman Craig Spencer, Hennepin County Highway
Norma Schee, Chairman, Planning Comm. Department
Larry Dallam, HNTB Don Peterson, Eden Land Corporation
Ghaleb Abdulrahman, Metropolitan Council Bob Vockrodt, Minnesota Highway Dept.
Paul Jensen, Eden Land Corporation Ghaleb Abdulrahman, Metropolitan Council
Don Brauer, Brauer &Assoc, Inc. Norma Schee, Chairman,Planning Comm
Charleen Beltt, Barton-Aschman Assoc. Dick Putnam, Eden Prairie Planner
Bob Vockrodt, Minnesota Highway Dept.
Drew Daniluk, Eden Prairie resident
Fred Houisington, Brauer & Associates
The M.C.A. report is the product of 6 months of intensive study by the 27
member Task Force. My thanks to all who participated in the Task Force.
Without the great amount of volunteer time and effort expended and the broad
cross-section of agency, landowners, professionals, Village officials and Citizens
the M.C.A. report would not be possible.
The purpose is to provide a suggested guide for development of Eden Prairie's
Regional Diversified Center. Presentation of the M.C.A. report to the Village
officials is in an advisory capacity, with the hope that Village decisions might be
based upon the research and recommendations of the report.
Richard Putnam Chairman
•
•
introduction
In 1968, the Metropolitan Council for the Twin Cities Area proposed a scheme
for overall metropolitan growth based on the concept of"Constellation Cities" .
Briefly, this concept involves the evolution of numerous major centers located
throughout the Metropolitan Area, which centers would include all of the basic
institutions and activity centers necessary to satisfy the needs and desires of
local populations. Schematic locations for these diversified centers appeared
in the 1968 version of the Twin Cities Area Metropolitan Development Guide.
One such center was located in the Village of Eden Prairie. Partly in response
to the Metropolitan Development Guide Proposal, and partly in response to the
access features of two interchanging freeways in the northeast portion of the
Village, a "Ring Road" was proposed in the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan, also in 1968. The original Ring Road concept was intended to be a
collector/distributor facility, channeling freeway trips to and from various land
uses located in the major center. As first conceived, the Ring Road called for
half—diamond access at four locations: Interstate 494 on the north, T.H. 212 on
the east, Interstate 494 on the southeast and T.H. 212 on the southwest. A
basic feature of the Ring Road was to distribute the trips generated by the center
in such a manner as to avoid the need for travel through the major freeway to
freeway cloverleaf now located at the junction of I-494 and T.H. 5.
History of Project
In 1969, the Village of Eden Prairie retained the firm of Howard, Needles,
Tammen & Bergendoff to conduct preliminary engineering studies for that portion
of the Ring Road running south from C.S.A.H. 60 to I-494. 'These studies indi-
cated a feasible location for such a roadway, and further indicated that any such
roadway would need to pass over rather than under I-494. Even in the study of
a very short segment of the proposed route, it became apparent that a piecemeal j
approach to the Ring Road concept was not a practical means of implementing
such a scheme. The many diverse property interests involved and the multi-
jurisdictional problems in the area dictated that a more comprehensive approach
be taken toward planning the entire area. Consequently, in February of 1971,
HNTB was again retained by the Village to conduct planning, traffic, and engi—
neering studies for the Ring Road and vicinity.
1
This work, conducted with the assistance of Village staff and planning consul- 1
tant, entailed initial liaison with local property owners and with State, Regional,
and Local agencies responsible for transportation and land use planning- The
preliminary land use plan, responsive to the aspirations of local developers,
was completed and resulting trip generation and traffic flow in the area was
computed and analyzed. This approach yielded much valuable information con-
cerning the wisdom of planning for such a major center, and did result in one
key development milestone: in late 1971, the Homart Development Corporation
• announced plans to construct a regional retail center in the southern portion of
the Ring Road area. This milestone was and is extremely critical in that the
retail center(proposed at a size of approximately 800,.000 sq.ft.)serves as the
nucleus of all other development in the area.
The preliminary land use plan also revealed several major problems to be solved,
principally in the area of transportation. First of all, it was discovered that if
development in the region occurs as originally anticipated, the entire south-
western metropolitan area traffic network would be seriously jeopardized in terms
of its efficiency and function. This revelation necessitated the imposition of
certain restraints imposed by the Department of Highways. Secondly, discussions
with the Metropolitan Transit Commission indicated that no fast link connection
between the Eden Prairie Center and other centers could be anticipated within the
foreseeable future. Consequently, traffic analysis showed that the expected
network of roadways which will serve the area in 1995 would be able to accommo-
date roughly 2/3 of the trips generated by the development originally anticipated.
These regional impacts led to the formation in late 1971 of a regional task force
chaired by a representative of the Metropolitan Council, and composed of repre-
sentatives of the Minnesota Department of Highways, Hennepin County, Metro-
politan Transit Commission, Village of Eden Prairie, and Planning Consultants.
Numerous meetings were held in early 1972 in an attempt to arrive at a clear under-
standing of the problems by all parties concerned. It became apparent through
these task force meetings that the first and foremost problem for the Village was to
determine what transportation network could and would likely be implemented to
serve the area. Thus, in the autumn of 1972 the scope of the original HNTB
contract was changed. Briefly, HNTB was charged with re-evaluating develop-
ment proposals in the area, re-assigning traffic volumes, evaluating thosevolumes
based on several different network possibilities, and to recommend solutions to
the problems identified. Work was to be coordinated closely with the Village and
with the Planning Consultants of development interests as well as with agencies
responsible for transportation planning in the area.
Major Center Area Task Force Formation
In late 1972, the Village initiated the Major Center Area Task Force as a method
of implementing the Comprehensive Guide Plan and previous work by consultants
and the Metropolitan Council Task Force. The M.C.A.Task Force, using much
of the preliminary data and recommendations from the previous work, was conceived
to produce a workable and implementable Planned Unit Development of about 1,000
acres around the 212 and 494 interchange. The technique employed in developing
the M.C.A. development framework are those common to all planning efforts.
The areas are:
RECOGNITION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS:
These include the natural features of the land, manmade facilities,
the relationship of the M.C.A. to the remainder of the community, and
most importantly, the identification of the physical, social, and economic
force s which either are or can be expected to strongly influence the •
rate and character of development. Assessment,of the existing forces
will include plans, policies, and programs of the Village Comprehensive
Guide Plan, Metropolitan Council, highway departments, and other
agencies involved in the 1,000 acre M.C.A.
ANALYSIS OF NEEDS AND DETERMINATION OF OBJECTIVES:
The most difficult, yet most meaningful, part of the total process will
assess such tangible items as varied housing needs, employment,
range of commercial services, educational/recreational opportunities,
and community needs for economic stability,adequate transportation
systems, and a development process characterized by order related
to the community's capability for provision of necessary public services.
Subjective needs, such as visual attractiveness, social vitality,
human scale, enhancement of individual identity and worth are more
diffic ult to establish by virtue of the value judgments involved, but
no less important.
Once these tangible and subjective needs have been identified and
analyzed, those selected as appropriate for the M.C.A. will be
translated into the stated objectives which the plans, programs, and
policies are intended to achieve.
DEVELOPMENT OF PLAN:
The inventory of existing conditions will be combined with the need
analy sis and the determined obj ectives to produce a plan or program for
action. The Plan is more than a map, appropriate at a given time; rather,
it indicates anticipated or desired patterns of development. The Plan also
includes statements indicating what steps need to be taken to assure
development within the M.C.A. to achieve the physical, social, and
economic plan objectives. The Plan may identify strategies or specific
action programs which public agencies can adopt to assist in the
implementation of the Plan components and objectives.
PLAN UPDATE:
Comprehensive plans are produced from conditions and attitudes which
are constantly changing. Plans need to be constantly reviewed to
see that they respond well to the changes as they did with the original
set of circumstances. The experiences and insights gained through
the process of development within the M_C.A. must be recycled into
thb "existing conditions" and "need and objective" phases of the
planning process,and the whole process repeated. The "M.C.A. Plan"
will, therefore, not simply be a map and policy document, but rather a
method of coping with change.
•
The Task Force began meetings in early 1973 and defined the method of proceeding
to be to divide into working groups considering four general areas: land use and
method for control, transportation systems, environmental considerations, and
fiscal impacts. The working groups met and conducted research work, and pro-
duced recommendations that were submitted back to the entire Task Force. These
recommendations and research material are presented in this M.C.A. Planned
Unit Development.
The Task Force defined the study boundary as a primary and secondary impact
area. The secondary area of approximately 5,800 acres encompasses sixplanning
sector areas within the Village of Eden Prairie. These sectors --some privately
developed such as The Preserve and Edenvale of over 1,000 acres-- will provide
a mixed residential, industrial, and commercial mini-village within the community.
Others, such as Bryant Lake, Smetana, or Red Rock, will employ the planned unit
development approach for residential development, stimulated by the public
planning of the area for the many land owners. The quality of life experienced
within the residential sectors around the M.C.A. will be closely akin to that
currently being developed within many new towns in the United States. Inclusion
of pedestrian and alternate transportation systems from the automobile as well as
mixed residential housing types and income levels coordinated closely with
community facilities and in close proximity to other urban services such as
commercial and employment will offer the widest range of personal opportunity
within the suburban Metropolitan Area. The Task Force evaluation of the secondary
area was more concerned with the identification of major existing systems, such
as transportation, housing patterns, and open space, and to evaluate their impact
upon the primary area adjacent to the 212/494 interchange.
The primary area of this study is approximately 1,200 acres which surrounds the
212/494 interchange. The primary study area of the M.C.A. is defined with
environmentally sensitive boundaries in three of the four quadrants, with resi-
dential development providing the boundary in the fourth quadrant. The M.C.A.
Planned Unit Development Report, which follows, makes recommendations for
these areas within the primary area. Application of the concepts, procedures,
and recommendations within the M.C.A. Report to other planning sectors of the
Village of Eden Prairie will not be appropriate. The M.C.A. primary area as con-
ceived by the Task Force is a unique and distinct planning area within the Village
and Metropolitan Area. Land use, transportation, land development requirements
will be specially tailored to development of the regional diversified center.
Over the first five months of 1973, the Task Force has worked to produce this
document and specific recommendations regarding the development of a regional
r
diversified center known as the Major Center Area, around the 212/494 inter—
change. The recommendations aepresented to the Village and other metropolitan
agencies as a public planned unit development to be adopted by the Village of
Eden Prairie and designated on the official zoning map as an amendment to the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
M.C.A. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:The following planning objectives are considered as essential policy directives
in the process of evolving the Eden Prairie Major Center Plan.
A. General Objectives
1. The Major Center Plan should provide for an integrated regional scale
development of retail, service, medical,cultural, civic, entertainment
and office facilities located within a relatively compact land area,
blended with high density residential development and certain kinds of
manufacturing, warehousing, and research operations.
2. The Major Center Plan should be developed in accordance with the
policies, system plan and program of the Major Diversified Centers
section of the Metropolitan Development Guide.
3. The Major Center Plan should be developed in a manner that will promote
the policies and objectives of the Village's Comprehensive Guide Plan.
4. The Major Center Plan should be both politically and economically
capable of implementation.
B. "Major Diversified Centers" Objectives"*
1. Develop a Major Center by clustering regional shopping, service,
cultural, entertainment, governmental and highdensity residential
facilities.
2. Identify the potential Major Center location and encourage the Center
to develop new and expanded functions as its tributary market expands.
3. Plan for the integrated development of the Center, including in such
planning provision for transportation and pedestrian circulation within
the Major Center with service to nearby employment centers and
residential areas.
4. Provide a fast-link transit terminal in the Major Center, and provide
local public transit facilities to the tributary area for those who cannot
or choose not to use an automobile.
*Selected and appropriately modified policy statements from the Metropolitan
Development Guide.
' I
5. Develop a long-range comprehensive plan that deals with the staged
development of the Major Center and its supporting public services.
6. Locate the Major Center where it is compatible with local natural
resources, and manage Center growth to protect important natural
features.
7. Coordinate development of the Major Center with metropolitan and
local capital improvements programming.
8. Provide a variety of housing types, including rental housing and
housing for sale, both in and near the Major Center.
9. Locate the regional center component of the Major Center so that
entrance points will occur at least s mile from freeways and express-
ways, and provide access to the site from several roads.
C. Specific Village Objectives
1. Develop a vehicular transportation system within the Major Center
that will adequately connect the Major Center to the regional highway
system without adversely affecting the through traffic functions of
the highway facilities.
2. Develop a supporting system of local arterials that will permit move-
ment of inter-Village vehicular traffic without the necessity of
utilizing the road system within the Major Center.
3. Provide for the retention and possible expansion of significant existing
non-residential uses within the Major Center and the orderly and
reasonable relocation of all other existing uses.
4. Recognize the constraints, if any, that might be imposed on the Plan
by virtue of previous municipal zoning actions or other public agency
commitments.
5. Provide for the "melding" of the Major Center Plan and the concept
plans of the Edenvale and The Preserve Planned Unit Developments.
6. Recognize in the Major Center Plan the need for adequate protective
plan elements between the intensive land uses in the Major Center and
the established and anticipated low density residential areas on the
Major Center perimeter.
7. Identify the plan relationships between the Major Center regional retail
facilities and the needed community retail facilities.
8. Consider the needs of the public educational agencies for major facility
sites and identify possible locations.
r �comrroen ions
•
iMajor recommendations of the M.C.A. report are listed under the four
report sections: Environment, Transportation, Land Use and Fiscal.
TRANSPORTATION
1. T.H. 5 should not connect with proposed T.H. 212 within a
distance of 4,000 feet immediately west of the Ring Road.
2. Existing T.H. 5 east of Mitchell Road should connect with the
Ring Road (dead end).
3. There should be continuity of T.H. 5 - and therefore some type
of connection of T.H. 5 with another trunk highway of com-
parable quality should be provided.
4. Full access should not be provided at any point on the Ring
Road from I-494 and T.H. 212.
5 . The roadway system comprised of Highways 60, 4, 101, and 5
should be upgraded as traffic demand rsquires and as the total
system can accommodate.
6 . The ring-route is not conceived or designed as the ultimate
transportation solution for the M.C.A. but must be supplemented
with other systems as development and trip demand increase.
7_ Encourage the use of Village and County- arterials, or "feeders" of
traffic to the Ring Route activities,thereby relieving the major freeways
of short trips and spread out access to Ring Route to prevent congestion
at a few locations.
8_ Recommend use of the Land Use Influence Model as a continuing tool in
evaluating the impact of land development upon M.C.A. movement systems.
9- As the need develops Activity Center Transit should be provided in the
M.C.A.
10 . Connection of the Village and M.C.A. transit system with the metro-
politan system will be required. The high trip demand in the M.C.A.
would justify a primary terminal connection with the metropolitan system.
11_ Transit for the Village or M.C.A. should serve a variety of uses; personal
mobility, cargo/freight and educational connections.
12_ Provide an integrated pedestrian system which connects to the major
Village systems and accomodates these principles:
a. Expand the efforts to make better use of parking spaces through
development of parking decks which would incorporate less
• walking, controlled environment, and less maintenance.
b. Develop an urban or town center concept that has definite nodes
for pedestrian focus.
c. Use planting and lighting to make the pedestrian areas attractive
and easily defined.
d. Provide attractive views from within buildings, such as the retail
mall, out on to pedestrian corridors that are pleasing and would
encourage people to walk,on-these:
e. Complement the pedestrian system with a well—coordinated graphic
and street furniture package.
f. Vary the paving materials on the interior and the exterior so as
to provide an interesting surface.
g. A key to any walk system is its maintenance; therefore, choice
of tasteful but simple materials that can be maintained at a high
level is desirable.
. h. Create interesting, usable spaces along the pedestrian routes
within the M.C.A. that have varied uses. Small boutique shops
and other commercial service uses could be located along major
pathways. Also, the creation of small plaza or vest pocket park
areas would be useful.
i• The exact location and alignment of the pedestrian systems
should serve structures, transit points, and major parking nodes.
The ability to connect these primary uses is integral to any system's
success.
J. Separation of pedestrian from major vehicular movement is advisable
with barriers, overpasses, and underpasses.
13. Bike paths may be constructed outside the ring road right-of-way to permit
a flexible, building oriented, bikeway alignment while minimizing ring
road right-of-way.
14. The design and construction of the Ring Route should minimize impact
upon flood plains, slopes, wooded areas, and existing residential areas.
15. Accepting the interchanges with Freeways 494 and 212, the ring road will
have graded intersections with signalization at major locations, T.H.5,
T.H. 169 and at other intersections as warrants are generated.
16. 'The ring-road is classified as a "collection distribution"roadway with a
projected capacity range of 30,000 to 36,000 average daily two-way trips.
17. Access to the ring-road will be careful ly controlled requiring shared
property access, median breaks, and curb cuts at major intersections.
18. 'The ring-road right of way will provide for storm drainage systems
and water and sewer laterals, thereby reducing utility easements through
developable property.
19. The ring-road should be constructed in 4 phases to minimize initial costs
and provide access to properties in a staged and efficient manner.
�7
•
ENVIRONMENT
1. All developments within the MCA will be governed by Village
P.U.D. standards for the Major Center Area.
2. All development proposals will require a suitable environmental
impact statement.
3. Development of the MCA, in an effort to minimize encroachment
into the natural features of the area, encourages "intense
urban development". The "trade-off"of more intense uses on
the developable land for the preservation of the natural features
will be encouraged. Compliance with the policies for the
preservation and protection of the natural resources in the MCA
is a prerequisite.
4. Areas identified in the Village Open Space System Plan will be
subject to a "reduced tax and no assessment policy" upon
satisfactory agreement between the landowner and the Village
to dedicate this land to the Village for public use.
5. The M.C.A. has seven extremely prominent natural areas which will require
various degrees of protection, modification and enhancement. They are:
i I
-Anderson Lakes and its related flood plain and wooded slopes.
- Bryant Lake and its related flood plain and wooded slopes.
- "Lake Edenvale" and its related slopes.
- Nine Mile Creek, its related flood plain and wooded slopes.
- Purgatory Creek, its related flood plain and wooded slopes.
-Rosemount Pond and the wooded slope to the south.
- Smetana Lake, its related flood plain and wooded slopes.
6. Public interest in all prominent natural features be a part
of every development proposal while encouraging intense
urban development.
7. The Ring Road alignment be designed to stay above the ~
Purgatory Creek Flood Plain eastern slope, above the
western slope of Smetana Lake, and west of the North
Anderson Lakes Flood Plain.
9. The highway crossings for the#212 and#5 upgradings
along Purgatory Creek be designed so as to limit the
number of crossings and so that bridges of significant
size be included to allow for the safe and relatively
enjoyable passage of pedestrian and other recreational
traffic. (Preferably no more than three crossings-- two
for#212 and one for #5.)
9. Development encroachment into the seven very prominent
areas be greatly restricted.
10. A program of Reforestation, Noise Abatement, and Beautifi-
cation be undertaken along I-494 and that these same
components be included in the initial planning for Hwy.#212
as well as the Ring Road.
11. Landscaping, lighting, walkways, berms, plantings, people
spaces, mini-parks, and other micro—climates be included
in development plans for the MCA to provide visual and use
relief from the hard-surfaces of the buildings and parking
areas.
LAND USE
1. The M.C.A. be divided into a primary and secondary impact area. The
secondary impact area is approximately 5,800 acres in the northeastern
portion of the Village, with the primary impact area approximately 1,000—
1,200 acres surrounding the 494/212 interchange.
2. The development of the M.C.A. as the community or southwest sector
focal point will have a large impact upon the character of Eden
Prairie.
3. The M.C.A., located In one school district and one community, offers a
great deal of potential for planning and development. Likewise, its
function as a regional focal point coordinated with other major diversified
centers throughout the seven county Metropolitan Area will certainly
require regional scale coordination provided by the Metropolitan Council
or other state and regional authorities.
4. The concept of the M.C.A. is to provide regional diversified center services,
such as office, entertainment, finance, shopping, employment, and
recreation in relatively close proximity to a wide variety of residential
areas.
5. The M.C.A. will function closely with the educational complex developing
along 169 with the Vocational Technical School, potential junior college,
and possible secondary high school site. Likewise, its relationship with
existing employment areas, such as along Hwy. 5 and within the Smetana,
Lake—Golden Triangle area, offers great potential for integrated development.
6. The M.C.A.'s close proximity to Flying Cloud Airport will offer limited
air cargo service and basing of corporate aircraft. The limited expansion
of Flying Cloud is expected, the extent of which is yet undetermined.
7. The M.C.A. is served by the regional routes 494 and 212. However,
the location of warehousing operations in the M.C.A.does not seem
likely with the excellent access to the roadway and rail systems provided
in other industrial areas of this community.
8. The primary movement mode will be the automobile during the next decade
within the M.C.A. Land development should take into consideration the
requirements for parking, efficient circulation, and building density will
be reflecting the requirements of the automobile.
9. Incorporation of a new technology"peoplo mover transportation systems that
would serve the four quadrants of the Major Center Area would be highly
desirable to reduce internal automobile trips within the M.C.A. This
system would function as a cargo handling mode and pedestrian movement
system.
10. Tile M.C.A. should be connected.with a workable transit system to the
neighborhoods as the needs warrant.
11. Location of a major transportation terminal for the metropolitan system
interfacing with the M.0.A. and community transit systems will be
required as future development occurs.
12. As the Ring Route is completed and development occurs in all four
quadrants, the linking of these quadrants with a combination of automobile,
transit and pedestrian systems will become critical to the success of the M.C.A.
downtown core activities; therefore, transit should be provided initially
as a bus or mini-bus system with a link to the express bus system of the
Metropolitan Transit System.
13. The developments within the M.C.A. should be accessible to all income
levels and, hence, those that do not have the mobility afforded by the
automobile must be provided with alternate movement systems that are
economical and provide acceptable service levels.
14. Eden Prairie is developing as a public new town with planned
mixed residential areas surrounding the M.C.A. The community's goal of
providing a wide range of housing, both in type and in economic level,
will be reinforced by the variety of opportunities in employment, shopping,
and service offered by the M.C.A.
15. The M.C.A. will have a rather large population within the radius of a mile
from the center, ranging from approximately 60,000 to 80, 000 residents at
full development.
16. Adopting the M.0.A. plan will clearly state the Village policy of contain-
ment or grouping of regional commercial activities as well as community
commercial activities to more efficiently serve these facilities while
being the focal point for the community. Designation of the M.C.A.
as the major commercial area in the community, the spread of commercial
activities along major automobile routes will be restricted and controlled.
A. Developments within the M.C.A.will serve two levels of insti-
tutional function:
1, the community-scale institution, such as neighborhood groups,
community-wide organizations, local political bodies, trade
associations, cultural groups, professional organizations, and
the local school system.
2. the regional-scale institution,such as hospitals, museums,
cultural, regional libraries, regional educational facilities.
These institutional functions located in the M.C.A. will provide awide
range of services for the residents of the community and the southwest
sector.
17. The urban design of the M.0 .A. will produce a strong visual distinction
between the downtown core and the surrounding residential sectors. The
ability to intensely develop commercial, residential, office uses combined
with the focus of the Village transportation system on the M.0.A. will
produce a city form which is easily visualized and understood by the
community citizens.
18. The preservation of skyline features, significant vistas, overlooks
and the significant natural features, such as major flood plains, lakes,
wetlands, woodlands which surround the M.C.A. are very important to
the preservation of the community image and environmental assets.
19. The development and enhancement of small-scale,urban open space features,
vest pocket parks, plazas, interior courts, shopping arcades and
sensitive site design of the pedestrian systems will be required
for development within the M.C.A.
20. As development occurs, coordination between sites to link pedestrian
connections, potential transit systems, and automobile circulation will be
required.
21. Eden Prairie's M.C.A. will provide the exclusive location for those uses
requiring the accessibility, intensity, and inter-relationships required for
uses in a regional diversified center. The high capacity requirements, such
as transportation, communications, utilities, police, fire, and land
use intensity will be offered exclusively within the M.C.A., thereby con-
fining these commercial uses in an identifiable area which is
economically serviced.
22. The plan for the M.C.A. recognizes the need for residential units in close
proximity to the downtown core and has medium and high density residential
in close proximity with the commercial uses while, with primary orientation
to the extremely high amenity areas surrounding the M.C.A.
23. Housing within the M.C.A. will most likely be of a specialty nature
appealing to age groups and family styles not typical of normal suburban
housing patterns. Consistent with the community's policy towards a full
range of housing opportunities, the M.C.A. should strive for a mix
between rental and ownership units,while encouraging each project to
provide for a mix of incomes and unit types!
24. Housing types will be of a special design due to the varied topography
and limited building site locations in proximity to high amenity areas,.
Clustered building design offering an opportunity for higher density
housing ranging from 15 to over 50 units per acre will be possible in
the M.ir.A. providing a high quality of life.
•
25. Regional commercial use, such as a discount center or shopping mall,
are the catalysts to stimulate the regional diversified center to attract
employment and housing. The regional commercial facilities should be
located to encourage activity and balance traffic throughout the entire
M.0.A. area.
26. Free-standing commercial and office uses should be connected not only
with the automobile movement system but with usable pedestrian and
transit corridors.
27. Highway commercial uses locate ',here there is excellent visual contact
with the freeway systems as well as high capacity arterial road systems
which link directly to the freeways.
28. Industrial development within the M.C.A.will be those uses which are
considered labor intensive, requiring little manufacturing space in com-
parison with management, marketing, research, and development.
29. 'The concept of multiple use development which would integrate a variety of
uses within a single structure or between adjacent sites is encouraged.
Special design and zoning considerations will be used in evaluating
mixed use development in the M.C.A.
30. All development within the M.C.A. shall complete a natural resource
inventory of the site and its impact on surrounding properties. The inventory
shall deal with the natural and man—created features discussed by zone in
the Land Use Section, and where appropriate, should enlarge on these
areas or create newevaluative criteria.
31. Approval of proposed projects should consider heavily the
natural considerations identified in the resource inventory and the design
of the project should fit those constraints.
32. Land use in Zone 1 would be regional commercial within the Ring Route
with other complementary office, commercial, and residential uses on the
outside of the Ring Route. On the north shore of Anderson Lakes approxi-
mately 70 acres of developable land is well suited for high quality,
sensitively designed,regional office consistent with the goals and objectives
of the Anderson Lakes Park.
33. The natural features of Nine Mile Creek and Smetana Lake dictate sensitive
design of medium and high density residential or office uses in close proximity
to those areas. fret standing commercial and highway commercial uses
would be appropriate along the remainder of the open land with high freeway
visibility.
34. Zone 3 has open lands within and adjacent to the Ring Route with high
freeway visibility. Highway commercial, free standing commercial,
and regional office uses are possible. The wooded knolls overlooking Bryant
Lake should be developed in medium density housing with specialized
design of structures accommodating the steeply sloping terrain and
heavily wooded character. Preservation of the entire Bryant Lake/Nine
Mile Creek Flood Plain as well as the significant knoll adjacent
to the lake is proposed.
35. Zone 4 will have regional commercial, regional service, regional office,
and highway commercial uses within the Ping Route. Defending west
in to Edenvale will be high buildable areas for regional service, office
and highway commercial. Provision of medium density housing within
the Ring Route between the single family area,Topview,and the Ring Route with a specialized building type is proposed.
36. Within Zones 5 and 6, all of the land with the exception of Rosemount
Pond and woods will be utilized for a wide range of commercial, office,
industrial, and housing uses. Preservation of the steep slopes between
the flood plain and the high plateau is required with medium and high
density housing clusters located adjacent to the toe of the slope with a
cluster of highway commercial, regional service, regional office located
on the north end of the flood plain adjacent to 212 and the base of the
slope.
37. The Ring Route location may be on top of the slope or at the base of the
slope, dependent upon comparative costs and land owner's site plans.
38. The major reason for developing high intensity uses on the buildable land
within the M.C.A. is the proximity to the high natural resource areas
adjacent to the M.C.A. Preservation, modification, and enhancement
of these amenities is felt to be of the highest priority and consistent
with the community's goals and objectives.
39. The M.C.A., through limitation of commercial/industrial acreage, and
phased road and transportation developments will be able to intensify the
normal suburban development pattern by reducing ground coverage while
increasing allowable square footage, thereby encouraging structures of
multiple stories which would allow their placement in closer groupings,
stimulating pedestrian and transit usage.
40. Development of a more intense town center in the M.C.A will dictate
great care in building, site planning design, which influences public
health, safety, and welfare while providing suburban amenities for the
public.
41. Transportation systems will provide the throttle mechanism for develop-
ment within the M.C.A. It is realized that the land use densities proposed
will eventually overload the Ring Route automobile system, therefore
requiring complementary development of transit systems to function within
the M.C.A., the community, and Metropolitan Area.
42. It is recommended that a modified set of P.U.D.procedures outlined in
the report, "High Intensity Sector Procedures and Requirements",be
utilized in processing all developments within the M.C.A. These proce-
dures and requirements would be specifically tailored for the M.C.A. and
would not be applicable to other sectors of the Village.
43. It is recommended that the Village undertake the development of a
comprehensive development ordinance,relying heavily upon performance
standards, to establish the specific criteria to which development must �.
conform in the M.C.A. The hiring of consultant services to assist in
research and development of this ordinance will be required, with the
cost to be applied back to all development within the M.C.A.
FISCAL
1. General economic forecast for the Village of Eden Prairie-The concept of
a municipality with a defined focal point, such as a central business
district, and balanced land utilization has become obsolete with the
emergence of the Metropolitan Region. The economic entity of which
Eden Prairie is an intricate part and with which individuals and enter:-
prises identify, is the Minneapolis-St.Paul metropolitan area. Among
the seven key metropolitan areas of the midwestern United States,
Minneapolis-St. Paul has maintained a strong leadership position as
indicated by its population growth rate of over 2.5% annually during the
last quarter century. The economy of the metropolitan area and the region
which it dominates has been described in numerous public and private
publications. Suffice it to note in this context that the diversity of
commerce and industry, the well-known high level of skills and educa-
tional achievements, and the progressive and energetic attitude of the
people of the Twin Cities account for its present prosperity and its
promise of an equally prosperous future.
2. The clustering of like uses in intensive project areas is consistent with
market tendency and increases efficiency and reduces support and service
costs.
3. Eden Prairie has been unique in its approach to land use development.
The emphasis shifted years ago from growth at any cost to providing an
improved quality of life. Eden Prairie officials are well aware of the
fallacy of past efforts in other communities with respect to land utili-
zation. The cure-all of financial problems of local government for years
has been authorization of higher density or of non-residential uses, a
practice sometimes referred to as "fiscal zoning". The fundamental
requisite of development policy does not flow from tax data and can be
derived only by definition of goals and objectives which reflect the
aspirations of our community.
4. Nationwide experience indicates that non-residential uses rarely if
evbr throw off a substantial tax revenue surplus. They pay for the
community services received and, therefore,do not constitute a burden
on the community. But, they also do not normally generate the excess
revenues which might be used to offset residential tax deficits. It is
assumed that if the Fiscal Disparities Law will be found to be unconsti—
tutional that a new state-tax-based sharing law would be passed by the
Legislature and it would continue to operate against the principle of
surplus benefits-
5. The analysis of the Homart Shopping Center proposal in the Major Center
Area would indic ate that the Village of Eden Prairie,i.e., the Village a s
a municipal corporation will not receive a substantial tax revenue surplus.
6. The obvious benefit to the Eden Prairie School District is substantially
increased valuat ions for tax purposes without a corresponding increase
of school age children.
7. The principal value of well integrated commercial uses, including a
regional shopping center, is the fact that they render a major service to
the public and by this function become real assets to the community.
development of the
p
Hundreds of jobs will be available as a result of the d
M.C.A. It is also correct to assume that employees in the M.C.A. will
find it desirable to reside in the surrounding neighborhoods.
S. Development of the Major Center Area and its effect on Eden Prairie's
indebtedness -- Borrowing policy of a municipality should be related to
the stability of a community. Stability can be measured by such factors
as population trends and the type and diversification of a municipality's
economic resources. The development of the Major Center Area will
require the Village of Eden Prairie to increase its bonded indebtedness.
Estimates of future growth in population and in assessed valuations
indicate that the Village does have the capacity to incur the debt
necessary to develop the Major Center Area.
9. The development of the Major Center Area is contingent upon the con-
struction of a four-land facility encircling the 212-494 cloverleaf. The
recommended policy on financing the Major Center Ring Road improvement
is as follows:
a. 95% of the local share or net cost of the Ring Road shall be assessed
to the benefited properties.
b. 5% of the local share shall be considered general community benefit.
The Village Council should consider increasing Village-wide partici-
pation of all or nearly all new commercial and industrial assessed
valuations, which would remain in Eden Prairie.
c. The benefited area includes those properties abutting the Ring Road, ,
• and those properties receiving their principal access to the federal
and state highway systems by the Ring Road.
d. Benefited rates, i.e., assessment rates, shall be computed by the
following three methods:
1. Base Rate Method. The entire assessment district will ultimately
be assessed for 25%of the tot&assessable project cost on an
equal, per acre basis.
2. Front Foot Method. All properties abutting either side of the Ring
Road shall be assessed at the rate of $50 per front foot.
3. Land Use/Trip Generation Method. This assessment rate shall be
in direct proportion to the trips generated by each property as •
related to land use indicated by the Major Center P,U.D.
e. Existing single-family residential properties and religious institutional
land uses shall not be assessed until such times as:
1. A change in land use shall occur through official rezoning of the
Village Council, and
2. There is a deterrnination by resolution of the Village Council that
collection of such assessments is necessary to provide sufficient
funds for the prompt payment of principle and interest on bonds
issued by the Village to finance the improvement.
f. The Village intends to periodically review all land uses within the
M.C.A. and adjust assessment rates accordingly. If special legislation
is required, the Village will approach the Legislature in January, 1974.
g. The Village Council should continue to strive for greater cost partici-
pation by the County and State Highway Departments because the Ring
Road serves facilities of regional significance.
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 1973 7:30 p.m., Village Hall
INVOCATION -- - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - -- ROLL CALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, Joan Meyers,John McCulloch,
Wolfgang Penzel,Roger Boerger.
COUNCIL STAFF: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich, Village Attorney
Harlan Perbix, Clerk John Franc
AGENDA
I. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD MAY 22, 1973, and MAY 29, 1973.
II. APPOINTMENTS:
A. Mayor's appointments of members of the Eden Prairie Drug Committee.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Condor Corporation, request for rezoning from Rural District to I-2
Industrial Park for land west of Washington Avenue and south of Valley
View Road. (Attached - continued from 5/22/73)
Action: First reading,Ordinance No. 222, rezoning from Rural District to
1-2 Industrial Park in accordance with Planning Report dated 5/1/73 .
B. Alex Dorenkemper, Maplewood Park Estates' Crestwood Terrace,
requesting rezoning to RI-22 and preliminary plat approval. (Refer to
5/22/73 Village Council Minutes, page 3, Item VIA)
Action: 1. First reading of Ordinance No. 229 approving reclassification to
RI-22.
2. Motion adopting Resolution No. 721 approving preliminary plat
for Maplewood Park Estates'Crestwood Terrace.
C. Protects SAN 73-7-06, Sanitary Sewer on Creek Knoll Road; SAN 73-7-05
(Stage U Sanitary Sewer along Co. Rd. 1; WTR 73-8-07 (Stage I) along
Creek Knoll Road and Co. Rd. 1. (Bring report previously distributed)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 718 ordering Improvement Projects
SAN 73-7-051 SAN 73-7-06, and WTR 73-8-07 (Stage I).
IV. PETITIONS,REQUESTS&COMMUNICATIONS:
A. Letter dated Mav 15, 1973, from `William C. Geimer, President, Eden
Prairie Athletic Association re. Hockey Program of EPAA. (Attached)
Action: Refer to Park and Recreation Commission for review and recommen-
dation.
B. jetter dated May 31, 1973, from Paul D. Stein, President, The General
Plumbing Co. (Attached)
Action: Receive and file.
Council Agenda -2- June 12, 1973
V. RESOLUTIONS & ORDINANCES:
A. Resolution No. 719 approving final plat of Atherton 2nd Addition. Plat
is located east of Mitchell Road, south of Scenic Heights Road in
Section 15. (Engr. report attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 719 approving final plat of
Atherton 2nd Addition.
B. resolution No. 720 approving final plat of Eden Farms 12 lot single
family sub-division. Plat is located east of Co. Rd. 4 at Duck Lake
Trail in Section 5. (Engr. report attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 720 approving final plat of Eden
Farms 12 lot single family sub-division.
C. Resolution No. 717 authorizing the issuance of Municipal Industrial
Development Bonds for Rosemount Inc. (Mgr. report and resolution att.)
Action: Motion adopting resolution No. 717 authorizing the project and
issuance of the bonds.
D. Second reading of Ordinance No. 223. Northern States Power Co.
Franchise Ordinance granting NSP the right to operate in the Village of
Eden Prairie. (Please bring copy, attached to 5/8 agenda)
Action: Motion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No. 223.
E. Consideration of the Village of Eden Prairie entering into Joint Coopera-
tive Agreement establishing a Metro Rate Authority to jointly and
cooperatively administer the rate provisions of uniform franchises
granted to the Northern States Power Company.
Action: Motion authorizing Joint Cooperative Agreement establishing a
Metro Rate Authority.
VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS. BOARDS, & COMMISSIONS:
A. Mayor's Report:
Discussion of 1973-74 memberships in Hennepin County League of
Municjpalities and/or Metropolitan Leamue of Municipalities.
Action:
B. Village Engineer's Reports:
1. Receivefcasibillty report on Projects SAN 73-1-04 and WTR 73-2-04_
Report covers sanitary sewer and watermain lateral service to King's
Court Addition along Canterbury Lane, Kingston Drive,Castle Lane,
and Crown Drive. (Report attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 722 receiving report and calling
for a public hearing on July 10, 1973, at 7:30 p.m. on Projects
SAN 73-1-04 and WTR 73-2-04.
Council Agenda - 3 - June 12, 1973
B. Village Engineer's Reports (cont.)
2. Receive feasibility report on Protects SAN 73-1-12 ,WTR 73-2-12,
and STR 73-3-12. Report covers sanitary sewer, watermain, and
street surfacing along Hiawatha Avenue from Scenic Heights Road to
south of Hillside Drive. (Report attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 723 receiving report and calling
for a public hearing on July 10, 1973, at 8:30 p.m. on Projects
SAN 73-1-12, WNTR 73-2-12, and STR 73-3-12 .
3. Receive letter from Black& Veatch regarding heating and air con-
ditioning for the Public Safety offices in the Water Plant. (Attached)
Action: Receive and file.
C. Village Manager's Reports:
1. 1973-74 funding of South Hennepin Human Services Planning Board.
(Letters attached)
Action
2. Summer Youth Employment. (Memo attached)
Action: Motion authorizing Village of Eden Prairie to enter into contract
for the Summer Youth Employment Program with the Minnesota
Department of Manpower Services with Eden Prairie's cost not to
exceed $300.
3. )tesolution No.724 authorizing land division in Section 29 for
Tames Sands. (Attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 724 authorizing land division.
4. Increased Inspectional requirements of Village Building Dept. (Att.)
Action: Motion authorizing additional position of Fire/Building Inspector
the funds supporting position to be derived from increased revenur
from permit fees.
D. Village Clerk's Report:
Village Clerk's Recommended License Application List. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving License Application List.
VII - FINANCES;
A. Payment of Claims No. 1980 through 2126. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving payment of Claims No. 1980 through 2126.
B. Cash and Investment Report. (Attached)
Action: Motion accepting Cash and Investment Report dated June 12, 1973.
VIII . MOTION TO ADJOURN.
•
IMUTES
EDEH PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
TUESDAY. ,IAY 22, 1S73 7:30 P.M. VILLAGE HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath , Councilwoman Joan !leyers,
Counc linen John McCulloch, Wolfgang Penzel,
and Roger Roerger.
COUNCIL STAFF: Village (tanager Robert Heinrich, Village Attor-
ney Harlan Perbix
I. PRESENTATION OF COLORS AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE BY EVEN PRAIRIE
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTlIEtiT POLTCE CADETS.
The seven cadets, the first of their kind in Eden Prairie, were
introduced by Mr. Jack Hacking. Tien Riggs, Steve Eisch, Chris
Fisch, Roy Johnstone, Lyle Hooke, Gary Clark and Hark Carey
are receiving first aid , traffic direction, Public relations,
personal identification number program training Tuesday evenings
7-10 and uednesday evenings 3-10.
II. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEET IPG HELD MAY ?, 1973.
Penzel moved the the minutes be accepted as publ fished with
the following correction:
Page 2, Paragraph 1, Sentence 3: Should read as fol lows: The
approximate assessment rate of $244 per lot unit....
After a second to that motion from !fir. McCulloch, the motion
carried unanimously.
III. BID AWARDS:
A. Consideration of bids for seven-gang reel mowers. (Bids
opened Monday, May 21, 1973.)
A motion was made by Mr-. McCulloch to award the bid in the amount
of S9176.50 to R. L. Gould & Company , 3711 N. Lexington Avenue,
St. Paul, Minn., 55112 for a Jacobson E1O tractor and seven-gang
hydraul is lift mower with all-hydraulic broom attachment and all-
weather cab. Mrs. Meyers seconded. On roll call, all voted aye.
Motion carried.
IV. APPOINTIIENTS:
A. Mayor's appointments of members of the Eden Prairie Drug
Committee.
As 11r. Komschlies has bean out of torso, action was delayed until
the next council meeting, June 12, 1973.
B. Discussion on appointments of student members for various
commissions.
This topic will be discussed at Council meeting scheduled for
Tuesday , May 29.
Council Meeting -2- May 22, 1973
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Condor Corporation, request for rezoning from Rural District
to- - Industri al Park for land west of !Washington Avenue
and south of Valley View Road.
lir. Heinrich informed the Council that a resolution to the road
problem had not been reached and it was requested that the hear—
ing be delayed unti 1 June 12.
11r. Penzel moved that the public hearing and first reading of
Ordinance No. 222, rezoning land from District Rural to I-2
Industrial Park be rescheduled for June 12, 1973 . Mr. Boerger
seconded. Motion carried.
B. Land Division on Plat 56976 Parcel 1500 requested byMr.
Warren Shultz. cNo officlaf pubTie hearing required. Oppor-
tunity for neighboring residents to comment. )
Members of the Vi 11 age Staff reported that the 1 and division does
not violate any Vil lage Ordinances and recommended approval of
the request.
Mr. Shultz stated that he purchased the land from the Kurtzes and
up until that eveni ng he himself had not been contacted in re-
gard to the purchase of the land by the residents of the area.
He felt that a simi lar request by any other developer would be
granted and it was his hope that he would receive approval.
Mr. Jack Burke reported that a regular letter had been sent to
the Kurtzes with no response and a second letter sent registered
received a telephone response indicating that the land had been
sold but not to whom. He further felt that the area could not
be adequately servi ced by fire or snow removal equipment and
that the concept would defy the backyard to backyard planning
concept.
Mr. Rosholt, attorney representing the Paradise Valley residents,
indicated that the lots would not meet Village requirements if
the proper size road were built with the cul-de-sac. Proper
screening was not i ncluded with the request for land division.
Mr. Putnam explained that Mr. Shultz's original subdivision of
five lots had been rejected and the matter before the Council was
a mere land division. If and when Mr. Shultz applied for build—
ing permits, proper screening as well as other Village Staff re—
quirements would be recommended.
Mrs. Meyers moved to endorse the administrative action of the
Village to grant Mr. Shultz's request for land division based on
the Village Assessor's memo of April 20, 1973. lir. Boerger
seconded. All voted aye with the exception of Mr. McCulloch who
voted nay. Motion carried.
Mr. Heinrich was instructed to inform the building inspector to
strongly recommend heavy buffering between the roadway and Pare—
s di se Valley lots when building permits ' ere requested.
Council Meet ing -3- May 22, 1973
In consideration of traffic on County Road 4 between Kurtz Lane
end South Lund Drive, Mr. Penzel moved to adopt Resolution No.
714 requesting reports from the County Highway Department on the
feasibility of turning lanes between Kurtz Lane and South Lund
Drive and of their install ation. Mr. Boerger seconded. Motion
carried.
C. Vacation of Franlo Road through the t•!estwind Addition.
t1r. Jullie reported that the bonded developer has assured the Vil-
lage that the existing road bed will be maintained until the
Village finds the other roads satisfactory. Utilities do not
object to theecation since they have no facilities in that part
of Franlo Road.
A motinn was made by Mr. Penzel adopting Resolution No. 706 vaca-
ting portion of Franlo Road through the llestwind Addition and in-
structing the Staff to procure a temporary easement for the con-
tinued use of Franlo Road until such time that the new road be-
comes usable . drs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
VI. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND C0FIMUNICATI0NS:
A. Request by Alex Dorenkemper to discuss the Planning Commission
ana Planner recommenratTons regaraing the platting of Maple-
wood rarK Estates' Crestwood Terrace. (Public hearing on the
preliminary plat will be heard June 12, 1973.)
Mr. Heinrich informed the Council that the public hearing could
not be held because sufficient notice to the public had not been
given. ir. Putnam explained fir. Dorenkemper's request and his
staff report of April 11, 1973. He felt that because of the
special circumstances that effect this property an excention
should he made to grant fir . Dorenkemper's request for rezoning
and approval of preliminary plat granted subject to the signing
of a land-hold agreement.
Mr. Allan Al brecht. representing Mr. Dorenkemner, did not feel
that the land-hold agreement vas necessary since the Planning
Commission "lould have to be petitioned prior to any platting. fir.
Heinrich explained that the land-hold agreement was a tool used
by the Village to prevent development--and in this case it an
area not serviced by utilities.
Ho action was taken on the part of the Council .
B. Letter dated May 9, 1973, from Homart Development Company.
Received for file.
C. Letter from Hennepin County Highway Department dated flay 10.
T?f73, concerning design criteria for lighting on CSAH 62.
This letter etas in response to the Council's expression of con-
cern about the over lighting in this section of the highway. The
letter did not address itself to this concern but merely indicated
that this is the type of 1 ighting used for all County lighting
projects. Received for file.
•
Council Meeting -4- Flay 22, 1973
VII.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES:
A. Resolution amending maintenance agreement with Minnesota
Highway Department for signals at t.11. wand CSAH 4.
A motion was made by 11r. Penzel seconded by Mr. Boerger to
adopt Resolution No. 706 approving reimbursable maintenance
agreement MHD for signalize tion at T.H. 5 and CSAH 4. Motion
carried unanimously. The Council requested to be informed
of the cost for a typical service call.
B. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 210, Consolidated Fee Ordi-
nance.
Action was delayed until June 12, 1973.
C. Resolution authorizing use of facsimile signatures by public
officials.
'Ir. Penzel moved that Resol ution No. 712 be adopted authoriz-
ing use of facsimile signatures by public officials on c hecks
of less than S5000. Mr. McCulloch seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
VIII.REPORTS OF DFFICERSlBOARDS AND COMMISSIONS:
A. Reports of Vil lage Engineer:
1. Approve pl ans and specifications for I.C. 51-2i Project
SAN 72-7-2 5. Sanitary sewer trunk and lateral rvi ce
along Pest 78th Street from the Purgatory Creek inter-
ceptor east to Rosemount Company. Plans and specs pre-
pared by Rieke, Carroll , Muller Assoc . Inc.
A motion was made by Mr. McCulloch adopting Resolution No.
707 approving plans and specifications and ordering adver-
tisement for bids on I.C. 51 Project SAN 72-7-25. Mr.
Penzel seconded. Motion carr ed nanimously.
Bids will be taken June 21 . 1973.
2. Receive feasibility report on Projects SAN 73-7-05,
SAN 73-7-06, and NTR 73-8-07. Projec is involve sani tary
sewer and water trunks on Creek Knoll Road, County Road 1
(Pioneer Trail) , and Franco Road. Feasibility Report
prepared
yRieke,
Carroll, Muller & Assoc. Total esti-
a cost ER
It was the Council's feeling that although the report en-
compassed three stages of construction, only Stage I should
be approved at this time. Stage I is needed now, is an in-
dependent stag ing project, and by approving only Stage I
those landowners in Stages II and III would not be subject
to assessment and public hearings.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel adopting Resolution Mo. 708
receiving report cal ling for public hearing approving pl ans
Council Meeting -5- May 22, 1973
and specifications for Stage I combining projects for bidding
and ordering advertisement for bids on Projects SAN 73-7-05,
SAN 73-7-06 and I•!TR 73-8-07, I.C. 51-253. P1r. Boerger
seconded that motion. Carried unanimously.
The public hearing was set for June 12, 1973.
3. Approve final plat of !destwind Addition. —
P1r. Penzel moved to adopt Resolution No. 709 approving fi nal
plat of !!estwi nd in The Preserve. firs. Meyers seconded.
Notion carried unanimously.
4. Approve final plat of Edenborough Addition.
;Ir. Penzel moved to adopt Resolution No. 710 approving fi nal
plat of Edenborough subject to the Engineering report recom-
mendations dated May 22, 1973,
5. Approve final plat of Kakach Addition.
A motion was made by fir. Penzel seconded by Mrs. fleyers to
adopt Resolution 711 approving final plat of Kakach Addit ion.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
6. Change Order for N.ater Treatment Plant contract.
The Council was informed of the proposed Public Safety office
area in the northern portion of the chemical storage area in
the Water Treatment Plant. This area would otherwise be
vacant for perhaps ten years at which time it would be used
for storage of chemicals.
Heinrich suggested that the financing could be supported
by the general fund over a period of years but advance monies
would come from the water trunk fund.
fir. Penzel fel t more explana tion was needed in regard to the
$2,000 difference in the cooling and heating methods for the
proposed office space. 'I
r •
:Ir. McCulloch m o approve Change Order No. 1 to Improve-
ment Contract 1-25 , Project WTR 71-8-30, with Gunner I.
Johnson and Son,Inc in the amount of ;16.236 for alterations
in the chemical storage floor according to the cost breakdown
from said contractor dated April 16, 1973. Further explanation
on the heating and cooling methods was requested. Mr. Penzel
seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. lotion carried.
B. The Report of Public Safety Director.
Director Hacking reviewed his report and commented on the
diligence of his officers. The Council commended the Public
Safety Department members--both fire department and public
safety--for the tremendous work they are doing.
Council fleeting -6- May 22, 1973
C. Reports of Vil lage Manager:
1. Major Center Area Progress Report.
Things are going well . A letter from Homart dated May 9 was
received explaining the parking within the ring road. Re-
lating to the ring road a letter was also received from the
State Highway Department indicating their unwillingness to
reroute 169 via the Ring Road.
A petition was received signed by Donald Peterson, Eden Land
Corporation, and Halter Carpenter, Minnesota Tree Inc. dated
May 21. 1973, requesting improvements of the Major Center
Area Ring Route from TH 5 to Valley View Road.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to accept the petition and
include the request in the ring route feasibility report.
Ftr. Penzel seconded. Fiction carried.
2. Letter from Midland Carriers, Inc., complimenting Public
Safety Department and Fire Department.
iir. Heinrich stated that other such letters have been re-
ceived praising the work of these two departments.
3. Availability of Emergency Employment Act funds.
Pir. Heinrich reported that one-year funds are available with
George Rolls. a local man, being considered.
D. Report of Village Clerk:
1. Village Clerk's Recommended License Appl ication List.
Mrs. Meyers moved to approve the License Application List
dated May 22, 1973. Mr. Penzel seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
IX. FINANCES:
A. Payment of Claims No. 1931 through 1979.
A motion was made by firs. Meyers to approve payment of Claims
1931 through 1979. Mr. Penzel seconded. On roll call, all
voted aye. Motion carried.
B. Cash and Investment Report.
A motion was made by Fir. Penzel to accept the Cash and Investment
Report dated May 8 . 1973. Fir. Redpath seconded. Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at midnight .
Suzanne K. Lane. Deputy Clerk
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 29, 1973 7:30 P.M. Vi llage Hall
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, Councilmen John McCulloch,
Wolfgang Penzel, Roger Boerger and Councilwoman
Joan iieyers.
COUNCIL STAFF: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich; Clerk John
Frane.
I. Board of Review.
The Village Council sitting as the Board of Review reconvened
their meet ing of May 10. 1973, the minutes of which can be se-
cured from Ken Chambers, Village Assessor.
II. Presentation of Major Center Area Ring Route Feasibility Report.
fir. Jim Murphy of Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff presented
the feasibility report. explaining the design criteria , phasing,
and cost estimates. Although the alignment of the southwest
quadrant (along the flood plain) is not settled. Phase I con-
struction begins at County 39 and 169, continues southwest (under-
passing 494) to 169, procedes northwest to TH 5 and 212 (tempor•
ary overpa ss), then north ending at Valley View Road- Phase II
begins at Valley View. procedes north and east to a two-lane
bridge on County 60 (overpassing 494), continues along 60 to the
existing bridge over 212 and ends at County 39.
Total cons truction for the two phases would be approximately
$8,317,100 . To that amount 4% funding, contingencies, and fees
must be added but ABC and NSA (Municipal State Aid) is subtracted.
Therefore. the Village obligation would be about 59.150,000.
Mr. Jullie stated that storm sewer costs will be kept at a mini-
mum. Also considerable savings are possible by underpassing 494;
by constructing the road at the top of the hill in the flood
plain area ; and by coordinating construction and development
grading.
Mr. Heinri ch presented the three assessment methods which would
be combined to minimize inequities:
1. Base Rate Method--The entire assessment district will ulti•
mately be assessed for 25% of the total assessable project
cost on an equal, per acre basis.
2. Front Foot Method--All properties abutting either side of the
Ring Route shall be assessed at the rate of $50 per front
foot.
3. Land Use/Trip Generation Method--This assessment rate shall be
in direct proportion to the trips generated by each property
as rel ated to land use indicated by the Major Center PUD.
Council Meeting -2- May 29, 1973
Mr. Redpath commended the Staff and Task Force for the fine re-
port--a job well done.
A motion was made by firs. Meyers seconded by Mr. Penzel to accept
the Major Center Area Ring Route feasibility report and to set
June 26, 1973, as the date for a public hearing on the proposed
Major Center Area Ring Route. All voted aye. Notion carried.
III. Discussion of Housing Task Force Report.
firs. Sonja Anderson expressed her disappointment in the response
on the part of Eden Prairie ci tizens to the meeting where the
Task Force Report was presented. The Housing Ta sk Force was
formed in late 1971 and charged to study the hou sing market and
its problems. The Force was to recommend a program which would
provide orderly residential growth in Eden Prairie and which
would be implemented by Village Boards and Staff.
Redpath stated that it is his concern that Eden Prairie is
not providing low and moderate income housing. It was discussed
that subsidy housing seems to be the only feasible way to offer
this type of housing. Mrs. Anderson said that experts who spoke
to the Force could not be pinned down as to how much land should
be devoted to this type of hou sing in any area and that the Force
could not make a Judgment either.
Whereas Mr. ficCulloch felt the Task Force Report did not answer
many of his questions, the other Council members felt the study
was a fruitful one and the recommendations sound .
firs. Meyers moved that the Task Force Report be adopted as the
official housing policy of Eden Prairie. Mr. Boerger seconded.
All voted aye wi th the excepti on of Mr. McCulloc h who voted nay.
',lotion carried.
IV. Discussion of option on the Ho lasek property at Bryant Lake.
Mr. Jessen explained that in order to use Bryant lake Park this
summer a new agreement with the Holaseks would have to be made.
Funds in the amount of $542,115 have been received from the State
of Minnesota for one half of the total purchase price of the
Bryant Lake Park. Receipt of a like amount is very probable from
the Federal Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. This funding would
cover the approximate purchase price of $942,000.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers seconded by Mr. Penzel to adopt
Resolution No. 716 authorizing the Mayor, Village Manager and
Village Attorney to prepare documents for the settlement of op-
tions for the acquisition of Bryant Lake Park. On roll call, all
voted aye. floti on carried.
V. Resolution No. 715 reestablishing date of bond sale on June 26,
1973.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel seconded by Mr. Boerger to adopt
Resolution 715 reestablishing the date of bond sale to June 26,
1973. All voted aye. notion carried.
.►• w
Council Meet ing -3- May 29, 1973
VI . Award of Insurance.
Mr. Frane presented the four proposals and his recommendations.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers seconded by Mr. Fenzel to award
Workman's Compensation Insurance to the N. E. Lane Agency--Iowa
National. On roll call, all voted aye. notion carried.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel seconded by Mr. Boerger to award
Fire and Related Coverage to the M. E. Lane Agency--Home. On
roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger seconded by Mr. Fenzel to award
Liability Coverage to the M. E. Lane Agency--Home. On roll call,
all voted aye. [lotion carried.
A motion was made by Hr. Penzel seconded by Mr. Boerger to award
the "Umbrella" Covers ee to the Hopkins Insurance Agency--American
Empire. On rol cl all, all voted aye. Notion carried.
VII . Resolution No. 713 designating the appropriation of Federal
Revenue Shar ing Funds.
A motion was made by Hr. Boerger seconded by Mr. Penzel to adopt
Resolution No. 713 designating the appropriation of Federal
Revenue Sharing funds. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion
carried.
VIII. Letter dated May 18, 1973 from Lower Minnesota River Watershed
District submitting the 1i72 Annual Report for the Watershed
District.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel seconded by Mr. Boerger to receive
and file the 1972 Annual Report for the Watershed District.
[lotion carri ed unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 11:15.
Suzanne K. Lane, Deputy Clerk
• PLANNING STAFF'REPORT
DATE: • June 8, 1973
TO: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich,' e
FROM: Village Planner Dick Putnam
SUBJECT: Letters from Stuart E. Gale, Attorney, and John J. Smuda,
Condor Corporation, regarding industrial project on
Washington Avenue
In reviewing the two letters, from Condor Corporation and Mr. Stuart E. Gale,
representing Mr. Herlely Halle, owner of the property adjacent to Condor's to
the north and west, it is obvious there is disagreement between the landowners
on the method of developing this parcel. The Village's interest is to protect
the adjacent properties and those interests of the Village relating to public
health, safety, and welfare. Under this category, three areas may be considered.
The first would be the utility and engineering problems, such as storm drainage.
Mr. Tullie's report covers this very well and I would concur with his recornmen-
dation related to the storm sewer and other utilities. Secondly, the concern about
the extension of West 74th Street on the north edge of Condor's property --without
the overall planning framework for the area, it is impossible to determine the exact
location of West 74th Street if extended. However, operating with the information
available, I would concur with Mr. Jullie's recommendation that we would require
an additional 20 feet of property to make a 60 ft. right-of-way street running east/
west_ The 20 feet of right of way may come from either of the properties. However,
with Helle's property already contributing 40 feet of right of way, the additional
20 feet would most logically come from the Condor parcel. if agreement between
the landowners to dedicate to the Village a total of 60 feet of right of way is
resolved, that would be possible; however, if there is no resolution between
owners, 20 feet should be required from the Condor parcel.
The third concern is the screening and building orientation of the Condor property
to that of Helle's property. The construction of one building on Mr. Helle's
property has established a pattern for his land. This would front the building
north of Condor onto West 74th Street and/or Washington Avenue. The commitment
made by the Village to Mr. Ilelle in his site development should he honored with
respect to adjacent development. Therefore, the Condor site plan should accommodate
the proposed location of adjacent buildings. To do this, proper screening-- meaning
earth berming and vegetation of a sufficient height -- to screen the loading area as
well as treatment of the building architecturally would be required if the loading were
to face the proposed West 74th Street. The total enclosure with a screen wall as
proposed by Mr. Hello as executed in the Inland buildings across Washington
Avenue presents many problems In terms of security and other operational matters
that are not totally desirable. Therefore, a combination of screening techniques
would be advisable on the north buildings.
If these considerations, combined with Mr. Jullie's recommendations, can be met,
I would recommend approval of the Condor site plan, if modified.
•
DP:kg
II
" 1
��wr>war
•
ar 1 •
lid 0 `MiJ Vat I OM} �.lCLJ 'Ufa o�1l_l
r-
June 6, 1973
n,'. obur'i Ile itirlclj
Village Manager
8900 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Heinrich:
Re: Samways Property
11 acres, Washington Ave.
As you have requested we have met with Nir. Herlieve Helle, the property
owner of the land adjacent to our site on both the north and the west.
The object of the meeting was threefold. One, to satisfy the Village
as to a spirit of cooperation between ourselves and Mr. Helle with
regard to the development of our land as it relates to the Helle
property and the proposed West 74th Street.
Two, to satisfy Mr. Helle as to his concern regarding the placement of
our buildings and the drainage of the si te.
Three, to satisfy ourselves that our project would be an asset to the
Village, that it would in no way be detrimental to Mr. Hel le's property,
and that we would neither suffer a loss of land nor incur expense for
West 74th Street if and when it would be constructed.
Mr. Helle's chief concerns were twofold. One, screening our loading
area on the north property line. We are agreeable to providing such
screening as is required by the Village ordinances in this matter.
We would prefer, however, to wait until the earlier of either the
construction of West 74th Street or unti 1 Mr. Hello or the purchaser
of hi s land constructs a building which would face our loading area
(it i s possible to build a building faci ng Washington Avenue in which
case the problem would not exist).
Two, drainage to Mr. Helle's property. Our proposed grading plan
indicates that the majority of our drainage will be to the storm drain
in Washington Avenue. We do not anticipate draining any irore water
to Mr. Helle's land than at present. We are agreeable to be guided
430 oak grove.minrsespolis.minntsota•5540;•612•33.8364
Mr. Robert Heinrich
Page 2
June 6, 1973
by Zile reco:,3,,el.di:t iurfL of t1n' iiil'y.^. Engirrpr in this r...'.ttnr_
Mr. Helle was made aware of our position on the above points and
seemed satisfied as to our proposed resolutions.
We further di scussed the proposed road (West 74th Street). It is
our belief that its present route (along our north boundary) is of no
benefit to our property and is solely for the benefit of providing
access to Mr. Nile's property. Mr. Helle has 80 acres of land
while we have only 11 acres.
We do not object to the road as 1..re realize Mr. Hel le must have access
to his proper ty. There was no possible configuration of buildings,
however, which would be of advantage to us with West 74th Street in
its present 1 ocation.
We, therefore, made the followi ng proposal to Mr. Helle: We would
locate West 74th Street directly through the middle of our property
dedicating the full right of way required provided we could obtain an
additional 40 feet of land across our north boundary from Mr. Helle
and the Village and also it Mr. Helle would share equally in the cost
of the road through our property.
We felt the above proposal was fair to both parties because it woul d
provide good workable access to Fir. Helle's property as well as
resulting in a workable layout of our property whi ch would then be
divisible to four buildings instead of three.
Mr. Helle was not agreeable to our proposal, however, and he indica ted
that he would prefer West 74th Street to remain where it is presently
aligned. He further indicated his will ingness to dedicate the balance
of the right of way required as he has a great deal of land.
We have, therefore, no objection to West 74th Street and are agreea ble
to properly screening if and when it is constructed. As we have
provided our own system of internal circulation and do not intend to
use the street for ingress or egress o;e do not expect to share any
assessments for the construction of the road.
Mr. Robert Veinrich
Page 3
June 6, 1973
As you can see we hove eadc cunsid;:rable effort to corn to 1 sati sfartnry
resolution of this matter which we believe is now resolved.
We request, therefore, that you place us on the agenda for the next
council meeting and trust you will favorably recommend the approval of
our zoning request.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Very truly yours,
CONDOR CORPORATION
Jo J. Smu
da
Executive Vice President
bjs
cc: Mr. Dick Putnam, Village Planner
Mr. James Cwayna, Attorney
Mr. Harold W. Carlson
•
= 1
MEMO
TO: Robert Heinrich
li
FROM: Carl J. Jullie
RE: A letter from Mr. Gale regarding the Condor project on Washington
Avenue
DATED: June C, 1973
My comments on Mr. Gale's letter are as follows:
1. Condor will be required to submit a preliminary uti lity plan for our
review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit for this
project. The plan must be prepared by a registered civil engineer
and shall show the proposed sanitary sewer, waterma in and storm sewer
connections. These utilities are all available along Washington Avenue
and are designed to serve only the easterly 400 feet of a Condor pro—
perty. However, a variance to include 500 feet of said property will
be granted by the Village of Eden Prairie per their engineer Mr. Dunn.
All stom water runoff must be directed to the in place storm sewer
on Washington Avenue and overland drainage across other adjacent pro—
perties will not be allowed.
2. It appears reasonable to expect that West 74th St. will be extended
to the west at some future time as the internal properties develop.
This would provide 1/4 mile spacing of intersections along Washington
Avenue which is desirable. It would also provide a corridor for water-
main looping and other utilities. Recommend that Condor dedicate 20 feet
of right of way at their north property line for future 74th Street. This
additional wi 11 provide a total right of way of 60 feet which is adequate
for a 42 foot wide street.
3. Sanitary sewer service for the remainder of the Condor property will
probably come from the west.
CJJ:jr
GALE LAW OFFICES
STUART E.PALE May 2.1, 1973 9901 1.222041.2 AVe. 00.
RALPH A.GALE.JR. BLOOMIMOTOM.H [30TA 55420
VU MMC 02
0
..)A
Tn thr llinn of Fria prairie
8950 County Road 4
Eden Pra$ie, Minnesota
RE: Condor Corporation Development on
Ma shington Avenue
Attentions Robert Heinrich, Village Manager
Dear Mr. Heinrich,
I an writing to you as the attorney for Herleiv Helle, the owner of the
property that is adjacent to the Condor Development project on the North
and :'Jest.
At the outset, my client wants to make it clear that he does not oppose
the proposed rezoning to industrial, nor does he oppose building up the
area. In fact, in his view, building in the area is helpful to the whole
area.
However, there ere certain items which merit your consideration.
LAY OUT - Essentially, it appears that: the Condor project is a good
lay out within itself. It does appear as to disregard the surrounding
property and my client would saggest two specific suggestions in that regard.
The loading docks in the project buildings could be facing the interior of
the project thereby providing better interior circulation. This is particularly
true of the northerly most building in that project. If that were to prove
too expensive, then suitable screenings between the loading rercp and West
74th Street should be provided. An example of what my client vices as suitable
screening is directly across Washington Avenue from the proposed project,
and its screening is accomplished by laying ordinary concrete block in a
patterned manner. In view of the fact that in the future a road running
from Washington Avenue West across my client's property and connecting to
Valley View Road will be constructed, my client feels that the Westerly
most building in the project could very well have the leading ramps facing
in a Westerly direction as now proposed. By the same token, in order to
provide over all access, my client feels that it is essential that Condor
Development dedicate Land for West 74th Street, as my client was previously
required to do, and as he was assured future developer shuld be roquired to do.
CONTROLLING SURFACT WATERS- Presently, on my client's property, the low
point is at 870 feet. The Condor project will have a grade of 880 feet.
Washington Avenue, in front of the Condor project is at 884 feet. Of necessity,
therefore, surface waters will have to drain to my client's property. A
future problem exists here, because, run off from the Condor project and other
7
projects can carry materials with them which will seal off the bottom of
this depression. Presently, surface water drains away by percolation only.
a er continued to allow
sealed off, t
s a .
Were this low spot 1 e and the surface u
P
to collect there, then excess waters would tend to run back towards Washington
Avenue. My client is presently digging through a ridge in his property,
which may permit some additional temporary relief, but the result is that
surface water may tend to drain to the south to the Pearson property, or
West across my client's property to someoneelse's property, or north towards
an existing culvert which in presently inadequate to handle surface waters.
1
The base grade on my client's property after digging will be approximately
' one per cent, the temporary problems of surface waters should be solved by
Condor Corporation presently and in the future in connection with an established
storm sewer system wIthin the Village and by virtue of which C.nnrinr wi.l) he
a benefitted property owner.
PADS AND SANITARY SEWERS - I previously indicated that my client was required
to dedicate a forty foot right of way for West 74th Street, and he was advised
that his neighbors did have to do likewise. Because Condor Corporation feels
they con develop their project without a street on the north side of it, it
has been suggested that they may not have to dedicate land for West 74th Street.
I believe this proceeds from a wrong premise.
A. The Condor parcel is 775 feet East to West, the Easterly 400 feet
can use Edina utilities for sewage.. The westerly 350 feet will require some
kind of service. It would appear to me that a sanitary sewer line will have to
reach this property from the West, which brings it across my client's property,
and it suggests to me that good coordinated planning would anticipate the need
for West 74th Street to be cut through with provisions for storm sewer and
sanitary sewer therein. Naturally, because Condor Corporation would benefit
from having these services available, I feel that they should bear their fair
share of these costs.
B. With respect to the road, I previously indicated that my client's land
will have about a one percent grade. Thus a much better street for carrying
traffic, particularly the type of -traffic going to offices and warehouses,
could be established by properly laying out West 74th Street at this time.
This would avoid a considerable increase in traffic on Valley View Road which
is a hilly, winding road and is particularly dangerous in the winter. To summarize
my client's wishes are these:
1. He wishes to cooperate on the Condor Corporation project and to consider
planning for the development of the overall area for the future, as well as the
present.
2. The northerly building of the Condor protect should either face the
loading ramps to the interior of the project or have structural screening.
3. Consistent with the recommendation of the Village Engineer, my client
requests that West 74th Straet, together with utility services be planned for
at this time and that Condor Corporation Project be built consistent with that
plan.
Yours truly,
ti‘.' 7f/Ail
Stuart E. Gale
SEG:cw
1
RESOLUTION NO. 718
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, a resolution of the Village Council adopted the 22nd
day of May, 1973, fixed the 12th day of June, 1973 as the date for a public
hearing on the following proposed improvements:
Projects SAN 73-7-05 (I), Sanitary Sewer along Co. Road 1,
SAN 73-7=06;-S-a.nffary Sewer on Creek Knoll Road and
W iR 73-8-01 LI.Z water a long Creek Knoll Road and Co_ Road I.
WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be
assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days' publ i shed notice of
the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice and
the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 12th day of June, 1973.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
Such improvement as set out in Council Resolution No. 703
of May 22, 1973 and as above indicated is hereby ordered.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on June 12, 1973.
}
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
May 15, 1973
Mr. Robert Eeinrich _
Village Manager
c/o Administrative Offices
Village of lden Praiiie
8950 County Road No. 4
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Re: hockey Program of Eden Prairie
Athletic Association
Dear Pr. Heinrich:
I am writing you on behalf of. the Eden Prairie Athletic Association
and in particular with regard to our youth hockey program. This pro-
gram has provided much enjoyment to the youth of Eden Prairie and is
of substantial value in developing the minds and bodies of the parti-
cipants for their own betterment and that of the community.
This program has developed and grown largely through the devoted
effort of. Per. Stephen Sopczak and his assistants. In order for the
program to continue and grow it is essential that Eden Prairie pro-
vide at least one more outdoor rink this coming winter. The demands
on our present rinks will only mean curtailment of the current program.
Therefore, we respectfully request that an additional ice rink be
provided immediately so that this valuable program to the community
and our youth will not be jeopardized.
Very truly yours,
EDEN PRAIRIE ATHLLEETIC ASSOCIATION
by William C. Geir'er
Its President
cc: E. M. Jessen, Jr.
E.P.A.A. - 14015 Crown Drive - Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Phone:54-4-2131
_ s
.f C,II tthjoo"GENE24 "L
eVe
7507 WES(271h STREET
MINNEAPOLIS,1^INNESOTA 55426
May 31, 1973
To the honorable Mayor
and the City Council
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 County Road R
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Dear Sirs:
In. the past year we have had a lot of problems with the plumbing
inspector, and we have had no results in attempting to iron out our
differences.
We have been trained to do plumbing according to the Minnesota State
Code, and the whole state is based on this code. Our company has eight-
een licenses in the state, and we have absolutely no problems what:roever
in any other village.
Every city or village has their water department repair water meters.
Your village requires that we take the meter to your village and have it
repaired and then return and re-install it. This is the only city that
makes contractors repair eater meters.
This is the only city that makes contractors install teo vacuum
breakers on each lawn faucet, and then changing to only one on the
laundry tubs now. They are also making contractors put relief valves on
all heaters when they should have hewn put on when the house was built.
Also, he had no business making our plumber take out permits for past
work when he went to get a particular permit.
We get along perfectly well with every other plumbing inspector in
Minnesota except this one. If things can't be straightened out, we may as
well cancel our license because we certainly don't need this kind of
aggravation. All the plumbers can't be wrong and this particular inspec-
tor _;..,'nnly right one in the whole state.
I am making a list of contractors who are fed up with being made
to do unnecessary things. Maybe we should go before the village council
and get things straightened out.
Sinter, y yo s,
/
Paul S it(, es.
r
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEER IOG REPORT ON FINIAL PLAT
TO: Mayor and Village Council
FROM: Village Engineer
THROUGH: Villoge Manager
DATE: June 8, 1973
SUBJECT: ATHERTON 21 O ADDIT ION - Report on Final Plat
PROPOSAL: The owner and developer, Atherton Townhousec, requests Village
Council approval of the final plat of ATHERTON 2tiD ADDITION.
This is a townhouse development located east of Mitc hell Road
and south of Scenic Heights Road in Section 15.
HISTORY: Zoning to RM 6.5 was finally read and adopted on April 11, 1972
per Ordinance No. 170.
The preliminary plat of Atherton 2nd Addition was approved by the
Village Council on July 25, 1972 per Resolution No. 548.
The final plat now submitted for approval is in essential con-
formance with the approved prelimi nary plat.
• VARIANCES: A variance will be necessary from the requirements of Village
Ordinance No, 93 waiving the maximum allowable time elapse of
6 months between approval of the preliminary plat and filing of
the final plat. This variance is justified because the developer
has proceeded with construction on a reasonable schedule:
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
All units will be served by municipal sanitary sewer, watermain
and storm sewer. Mitchel Road and Atherton Road wi 11 have
bituminous surfacing with concrete curb and gutter.
PARK DEDICATION:
The overall requirements for park dedication within the Mitchell
Heights P.U.D. have been properly pi alined per the Village Parks and
Recreation Director.
BONDING: All streets and uti iities within the plat will be privately owned
and maintained. Therefore, no bonding for these improvements will
be necessary.
•
--- Engineering Report - Atherton 2nd Addition
Page 2
•
RECOi."1ENDATION: Recommend approval of ATHERTON 2ND ADDITION final plat
subject to the following:
I. Council approval of variance from Ordinance 93 waiving
the maximum 6 month time elapse between approval of
the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat.
2. Receipt of fee for Village services.
Respectft ly ubmitted,
coAp
Carl J. Ju llhe, P.E.
Village Engineer
•
•
•
•
•
r�
•
•
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION iJO_ 719
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL
PLAT OF ATHERFON 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Atherton 2nd Addition has been submitted in the
manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and
under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly
had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the Village
plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minne-
sota and ordinances of the Village of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE
OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Atherton 2nd Addition is approved upon
compliance with the requirements of the Engineering Report dated
June 8, 1973.
B. Variance is herein granted from the requirements of Village
Ordinance No. 93 waiving the maximum time elapse of 5 months
between approval of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
plat.
C. That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy
of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds and/or
Registrar of Titles for their use as required by NSA 462.358,
Subd. 3.
D. That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above
mauled pli.t.
E. That the Mayor and Village !tanager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the. Vi llage Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on June 12, 19/3
ATTEST:
Peu� R. i2edpath,Mayor
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
•
• ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor and Village Council
FROE1: Vil lage Engineer
THROUGH: Vil loge Manager
DATE: June 8, 1973
SUBJECT: EDE"i FARMS - Report on Final Plat
PROPOSAL: The owner, Shelter Homes Corporation, requests Village
Council approval of the final plat of Eden Farms. TM s
is a single family residential plat (R1 22) located east
of Co. Road 4 at Duck Lake Trail.
HISTORY: The Eden Farms plat is within the Eden Farms P.U.D. which
was approved on January 23, 1973 and March 13, 1973 per
Resolution Nos. 641 and 666.
Zoning to Rl 22 was finally read and adopted on May 22,
1973 per Ordinance No. 221.
Preliminary plat was approved by the Village Council on
Apr i 1 24, 1973 per Resolution No. 687.
now submitted for The final plat approval is in essential
conformance with the approved reliminary plat.
PP prel
No variances from applicable Village Ordinances will be
required for approval of this plat.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
Municipal sanitary sewer, watennain and storm sewer to—
gether with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous
surfacing will be made available to all lots in this plat.
PARK DED C(;TlG,'1: Park dedication consists of a strip of land along the north-
eas t limits of the plat. This dedication is satisfactory
according to the Vi I lage Parks and Recreation Director. ';
The designation of "Park" should be replaced by "Outlot A."
BONDING: Bonding for streets and utilities shall be required as
fol lows:
•
i
• Engineering Report - Eden Farms
Page 2
•
Description of Improvement Estimated Cost
1. Sanitary sewer, waterrein and $50,000
storm sewer and street con-
struction including sodding
any; street signs per approved
plans and specifications pre-
pared by Bather, Ri ngrose,
Wol sfeld Inc.
2. Construction of Duck Lake Trail $36,000
on new alignment to match with
Duck Lake Court by October 1, $86,000
1974.
Plus 20;d $17,200
$103,200
Total Bond Amount Use $105,000
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of EDEN FAR?1S final plat subject to
the following:
1. Execution of the Developer's Agreement to be prepared
by the Village Engineer which shall specify the following:
A. Performance Bond in the amount of $105,ODO.
B. Receipt of fee for Vi llage services in the amount
of $1,290.
C. Completion date of October 1, 1974 for all street
and utility construction including re-alignment
of Duck Lake Trail.
D. Na occupancy until Duck Lake Court has its initial
bituminous base surface.
2. Receipt of a Warranty Deed to the Village for Outlot A.
Respectfully submitted,
• Carl J. '£tc e, P.E.
Village Engineer
r
o
'1') ,
�'
• •
-
.
ti
.
r �R
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
it EDDEPIN COUNTY, MI NNESO fA
RESOLUTION NO. 720
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL
PLAT OF EDEN FARMS F-
r
WHEREAS. the plat of Eden Farms has been submitted in the manner
required for ulattinn land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS. said of at is in all resoects consistent with the Village
Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minne-
sota and ordinances of the Village of Eden Prairie.
NOW. THEREFORE. RE IT RESOLVED BY TIE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Eden Farms is approved upon
compliance with the following requirements:
1. Execution of the Developer's Agreement to be prepared
by the Village Engineer.
2. Conformance with the requ i rements of the Engineering
Report dated June 8, 1973.
B. That the Vil lage Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified
copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds
and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA
462.353, Subd. 3.
C. That the Vil lave Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy at this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plot.
0. That the Mayor and Village Mane er are hereby authorized to
Ecocute the certificate of approval on behalf of the Village
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADJPTED by the V illage Council on June 12, 1973.
Paul 11.—Redpath, Mayor
Al TEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
DATE: , June 7, 1973
TO: Mayor and Members of Village Counciq_
FROM: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich
SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS
FOR ROSEMOUNT INC.
On April 10th, Rosemount Inc. presented their request to the Village Council
for the issuance of Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of
$1,500,000 for the purpose of expanding their present plant on West 78th
Street by 75,0 00 sq.ft.
The Village Staff, in conformance with Resolution No. 596, a resolution
adopting guidelines for issuing Municipal Industrial Development Bonds, has
completed their review of the Rosemount request. The six main points of the
resolution are covered as follows:
1. Rosemount's expansion plans of$1,500,000 exceed the minimum of
$500,0 00.
2. Complete set of audits for two previous years have been provided and
reviewed, and found to be completely satisfactory.
3. Copy of Dun & Bradstreet's most recent rating report has been provided
and found to be most satisfactory.
4. The provision that requires a "minimum coverage" of two times the
principal and interest due earned annually the previous year before
taxes has been demonstrated by Rosemount's experience and recorded
in their annual report. Rosemount Inc. has also demonstrated a
record of yearly increases in earnings before taxes.
5. The fifth provision suggesting that the fair market rental value of the
building must equal or exceed the total amount of bonds and interest
due is not met in this case. Rosemount has stated that in this case
they wish to use their earning power as the security.
6. Rosemount Inc. will pay for all administrative and legal costs involved
in issuing the bonds incurred by the Village of Eden Prairie.
Depending upon the Village Attorney's satisfactory review of all legal documents,
the Village Staff's recommendation is that Council adopt Resolution No. 717
(copy of resolution attached) authorizing the project and issuance of bonds.
RPH:kg
YI
VILLIS.C,E 07 iiE", PRAIRIE
!!ET:EPT.. Cei;N"TY,
ITFOLUTIO!; :70. 717
• P.E ; LuTio': . T02r s rT7, r ::;';17.-CTI."7,!: Yr)
(.17 v!;".CT:n.,7, !!;,7-5-
717.TAT, p.7!) T r.7.7' n-
F*".7(.7 "71-1 '• ' 1•17';'•'..;
A '1
LE IT 7.'7.:707.1.".i:P tt-e Curie"), ef thee Vil1a7-,e of 1:d.ert
ninnosohe on fOil C7%;
].. It he:: Loon proposed ;.-",.et the. ".':71cgc .:enr:cire certein ro.d.
rop-
er t7 and lees the ;; no, tegether 7 no. ;,:i[117.!: and 1-.2:76:.,onants
to be constructed t!,et-P.)n and ccrtaln to. the., :11,7,1 og o.iptsi qul:r,ent, to
P.oserinuat Inc- , a !!!_nne.;):::: cornorati.on, .:17.ch 7:ill use the Project as an
o.if itsne-zistinl facility to nno...ricle 71;Innfacnriep,,, research
and office space to he Ilsol in the tie *-en.;CacturE-- nod solo
tatper.ttere end pres14.17, sensors end. othen 1;,.;hr-nent'...;. Tee Cnteicil
r-eli.nainary apilrovzil to L'.12 pro7e.;e1 by resol.etior::. adooted orii 19,
1973, and 73....n.,..1;uant to those 'ehe nr;
to the Projant o.xve n snbcdr.te.1 to the Counil asp are nor, or clean_ be
placed, os file in t!-e i.) ce of the "."::11:1;--1
(a) 1,7arr.enty Deerl, ine, to t'ne Yill.ac.,e title to the
leased Innd whlch is slthercnr! in hcnnr.nr.p!n. Colnehy,
Minz,e.;ota;
(b) Lease, dated as of 1, 1273, eropen:d to be ,zsle
end ent,ered into bet,,..-:,en tee V::rJege. p rid Pont trio ,
or; Teapot;
(c) Eortga;-,e and Indenture o T-:nr:,;:, dater! es of. Nay 1,
1173, proper;ed to he 0i . 0. ehhcre.6 into between
thou 7.1 and the Nc.•:r1h;e:;t',rn ir,nel Bank of
Itinne. ::,)1it, NI tel'ontrs, ri Prt;;rre;
(6) Of f feint Stste-hont, cit7-,1;nectus,
2. It end de-!.erti thet:
Ca) the real propenty, ,;, i:enro-.-encnts
and 14.2,;sed equ!--o.eat f7.e.erihed
Lease .!.:11 In 1k:11:e-ere ra to 71 ph--inraph 1 ernstitu te
a Project iced .by the flrrUcipn1 :nCentrial Develop-
ment tort;
(b) the pe.-:rm.:e of. the Projeet. Li, .r the ....loot thorenr w III
he, in :r6eote tn.!le on',I!-• -0.1 faro hy h'ee en—
hcy.eue;te..rint and deve!-;.:)-ent of recle-nf...--7elly
and eon-net-he en as no. -er,:ent, so ler .1n eo,;;:!)ie, the
Enc y:‘..•ri! tO 1111. ' t i- -i ilr. 1s 'WI area': Of.'
C111-.`":tiC 7,ne-;;,10-.-nnunt; th.; ria'' of inda-.tny to
. .
•
re:;^,IrC0; or rt4,--;,1•11.ty cvt,lo-_-
tt, rot..;1•1 t
,t w 1..t-
CO
,1 •t,rvi ,••:: Cie -o-,a
Oz.v!lo : ' ;;;•: co, .!,•: r•rov
;tn. 'otto..:". • L.1... !;:,; t-, th,
(c) tlna 71-ajoo:- Ville7o
at uili ;:; o
C.1:2
- -•;?ort.-ttf t,-.; of ne.,:er.iiirs!
and pl-ct!act:; • aDd 11:••
(d) t1i roi , t7o7platt;.!, 11111 'oil:!can't-; to
brn:o. n.,•,:nty,
School in loca;:.,d;
(e) the Pro:loot Itc!,-;11 :,;ro.:c•Ilv tlica
ot tl:,. TO
t.tin!ditri; 20 ft1,• - o0 !,orpo!to:; ao.I y,liciof; of tho
(f) the arqu'.sition contt,;:tiation of tho l'ro:ject, tha
cf t.., tly•
ct. tab c••,ttnt i!.•,:d the
porfot-rrance ef r,f !fact
; con".i in,: ..21 0212 200 Lnd T_0. n22T1tP 1101 n!"
1. w ▪ ;Ind •t:hit.";;; roluitaci noot.,- the
tut tr.,1 :011 1.070 of th:`, Statf.7 0; '.11111,.,;,-,t-:, 1-c, /7-0
I.e;;•;0"t, ▪ 811C.1 valid aat..: binding clii f.ono
of the ;r-rcrcl,1,1:yrk. dtfi do aIr tot.713, Lra
ilat:aorri- • t.12 I liviontini 31ilovelop!"-,ttl-
A,-,':;
( ) it do5in.',17,••• di. t t'n! 201101 by ._,.t.tt:toriz•ad,
accerctinve ".-!, 'fit; pro7i-1oas
Out : i StibieCtto
010.1,1 3'7...C. forth 772: Aoticle 3
of taro.; Lnd rondit:ioa,-; the Village
dett!.rni-e; ho di' do I and nropor,
to •ortit;,;;; n th" eon;:trtiotiott, ,crini!;;.tion and
11•;!.,•10 tot, 1;;Htli,:•" or trill dO•-•_;, ir•lpto...e-
nt•at•; ad e.tzlo!! to Ito In 11•,!1•! iii rho
,I0.'ilil,lh CO
Ton!tnt: .a1 i•t hOr•innor dotormittod by TO Tenant,
'olth Or thoot di'ort-';-;e:ront for.•.,i_dt.; no
required for rho co:istroc tinn t;t1 ticacquisition of
ot'oar mindoio,i1 fac il!tics
•
—2-
A
•
•
(h) t'rtst •y-lor,tt--11 D-o-71 rlont
ron: ,5n.,7) ,^.77 to
Zor th.-••t. rC-p.,irri. to rov'se,' 'tot,
o ,s to
' 71
(Ho, thc,
nit, • ' s to pt.::
c tr.o ▪ c:
-;
t
77. ! On r..-erso-.1; or 1-no72tt,
f CtP: , ill 011,1 S:".1
le.. 117 or 1--7tO -r('or, •i- thi• cOd
pre.sir tern o the.
dorio;; "..-7;;Lco, to.r -Ts -oft'' 00.stitti25,
• 474,tr1 ort: • n!
thin ,-. :.: sorte
.s LIi tont tho
t".,1‘.1 rrott-rt:r '071r.)tiS•inT; the Sii7T;
(1) tho ros.:7.olo:t; .„: '.0,1.-,nic•:tet:! St
: .7n. the Lcore s; Indenture,
r,r.1 oor
to
the p , t M.:1 t
to 1 i Li'': Lri.tr.no, no hoidi the
F;1“11 o-oir th.,; ..it to cot;:,-) oserei_oe
• t.'io Le lty cf. t;o ot
7) 010:0 1.7,2. i' : tficcof
,tht
• Hei
'to- '-o t7:tt
L...1111 nOt 7.4.00
tho 12: :t"so„,ot 'rojert t; Cl
1...ndor 11 ref: ite
f 5 p ty.1.1, , 1;o1,1, from
I Lie '"'•`71:
dC1,t: r): Finn ,::15.1
the o'17,1i1:7; —lid or5t.015:Or
3. The forms oT 77it'ro:ity ' nortt-„ir;to II-1.2.entiire of
Triti;t ;se:ierrciiil to in e!rite,rd7e 1 ;one iorteved . The I:ill:kis, ac-ceets the con%ip3,--
ance by :file 7:zirrantv tired of hind. The Lease, wit.th such variations ,
ii.icos o:16 od::!t'.-,,.:-1'.., as tho '..5.1.':,.,o ,••...!•ar.)..,:,- 71,..' hete.-.)..fter ,, r.,.71 .',',,,,)1.-Crri•itt.!,
to •-• ,..:,-.,.,..ILL.,.! it, ,I'L• .:"••••• ..:1•.1 CY.1 .1,:-•'1..Y". Oi the Vi:i ',.-, '.''.• CY,...'L
nyor a,y1 ',.."...1 .....,.! ."..a,.:..,.-- t, 1,,,",..,•,,. t:"...,.. .-.. ...o.ol ... Lh,.., t.,,:1, , I,,
t.',,...1 :,..'. , ': .."•I'LLI,•-• L.-,•corp,-" t ..- ,. ,:a,)....C.3- L'...,ace.. Ltl,'.),.••••21':.,..:2, .i.3
,l..!;:o...---__"•-c.,'.1 ":.- ".•,O .,:',.‘',A,,.'•-• i i"-.. •,....,,•.,. ,...--:., .-.-.-1 .--.1'•..,.'!...1.f :-. t::,-.! \i-i.'..1,:::-.•?. 1,-..: 'L:',,.o
rayor ar.d Vi-.1.1.-. .: :..'•.a.t1.-,:r.. and cC,.."1.i..:,::.1 f.:c 7!...."1 77'.7.:1T.7',,. C.O:C."`.ti of all si
— the cl.:.-..-.):.7.-....ats a',-`1. ,-.- '')-",-.)::-.).(1, ...'.c.-_-1 ....-.:.. racardod a3 ,a7.70f,,idc,.1 tr.7.erin..
Il....2 ol.'.'.eic.1 tr:at,a-....:-:ta , :-.-..- rra,.-..-.a.-:t...-., •,;-.::_t.:-. .:oaa:•. •,,7!....y....:,:or_s, ir.,:o.tt.ion.
and acifi.t.i.ons ao t...e. Va.,.1o.;cc, 2,.ttot7n.':7 :-.-aL,- ::.:,-2,...af tar th,ci, (......po-.-opri.cate is
Tioni:Lo7 a.-)7,-..,),...a.:1., aIta t...! C7.709 ::.:!-.1 i;. t: ...2. aL:::C:1:.:1`..!,. ..7:-.1.,-.Laii,L2,:, L.......,2.-ce1r,
-
cons.....1.,_:!.; to tha din t.:.:',...1.2-'r, G:..7. Li`..'-:1', CII.ie:i:1 statto7.ont,
or ivrespactua.., to ,,-o:aL-.-,,o-tiava ra-f,..-:::a5eis cf oh: r.,nris.
4. In ;Intl c.1p.etf_on of tc-..?. ':.--'17_ i.37 ci rtv.nu.ca..s of to ?ro.j2Ct,
00.2 Villawo cliall p-ocicci fort`a-cit'a to : 11311!O..s ia.,... .tri2.1 Dove2.......p.00nd
., Ravel-Ica lio..)::.3 (in:e,...o.,tr.t Inc.), iL,-.tad as o: '..'.ay 1, 1"..113, -in LI:ca.
amount of 'CO1,503,':`..10, in t'ara. to-ar and ::,..,-a.., tfin tcrt:.; .7..:t. ai'o7-11 in. t.Cle.
ilortr);ar: ....lad fain tar .-.';'. ....:1:,.,.',i':, ,...:1-..-...la 1_,at:....i ara, !col' faic..- parpo'oTa,
inco-L-pot-atcd in tIld... : :pi. tio..,.. il..7..Li 7,..7,.:,:i LI lart talairoo:. Tho pi:o2esal of
Padtv.i.-in ICalioc--_-, Jac'rcaici-). C. 3.oart.C.;, Io.totTo rate'. to poita:,...a(o sto'o. bc:ns at a
of 9.12t of their. ;nr val.ao pl....a zaza zu.:,:t 1r.t0:2!.i'a, •apot. tl-le total; nod
CO,.....•!Titi.enr., sot forth in :-.....n.e ...-sr,...r.:: e and .:.-.-lot'.t.....re of 'fr.:st i... T.,.oneby
.r..‘,..via.1 and e.i...,termin'..!Ci .•:-.O. be 7:C:riG,:::...):,., aa...c is 11,-...r,a‘iy ,-...,-.cp....7 tot. l'ao. ILvyar
and. coo 1..'"...aaf,e."7 ':'.7_:,..' :''.1'..:!:‘,r,r1".Y.:Y..., ::::::'. c"..irod).-id to r.:....•poa-o i...-...,:i r.:-...a•:.,e
the Eloada. as prescItib,ad 1..i the ciart;a7e. ;at:, in:e.nturn o: "Intat. ..-.y.: to
r'elf-....o.• t....7..7.1 to the '77i...:;003, '...-.::-.i:::-...r ...;.t:'. ... co.:-at:..c.Cayl .-.07; of hi:t. ,
....-.i ot.....2:?.. :a--rant: /......cair,a1 1): '....:io. !.c.....,rtni... a-ad Ip=aaaturo
of T rant, f or a.v.tl-ant- ratio:: end :1211,:00:: to -..1..-... pott11-).:;:a.-r. I:, oa tho 1
date K c1.0L..i.a.'..,, thi r'..,.City‘.t....,•) :',•.-.'..";'; i''.-:—., 7:,-.)!: ,.7-...".,..:17 1.0,. '....f::,.,.-..,.1Y.j.,::1., par.2in.:;
Irtep:dtat.'a..a rr t..1).o it,........1-1,.,) r.....,',...h., t..... . " yo•: ..o.: V...,,lo:....._ 1:.•.,.,. ...v ..y...o.
aatt'a..at.i.T...1 topop re -o,.. ol th, .,,:to....;a-aa .o: Li:: d,...;i..,.i..,:.i. ., !.;').1),..3, to e•....-..c......to
and (12l1var to scch ro',roil...It...2r .:.Pe. Cr a':-:77. .L.,..:•::'Cr i...ry :':,),t.,-,:.; , Ill i.7.")rdn2C,T,
S3,7.L."-.7_0';'. ri.':,.0i, '.'.i......-....:-...-.,ta Stat...1....e , ..::)..(:_1......1-.1-... 1... .. .f.. trttio.1.1:: ir. 0...,-a
pros cti.b......t for the .....a C:in4..t1-:o. 1.%L...165 '0,..t in ty17.,...atritte:a. fora, -car,-alla.1..) ...0
7..,:(7.11.....,..;er at it: or:.:t., tnot,ari.-1..; en ..-...iptz .--or.: J., 1973, to ....,2 ?a....1 *a; ,....n
r..:-.211..a.,::::', :,7`. ,,. 7.1:: f,-•": ':.::7- ha; :;, :..;-..- '::-..... ','.i.:'.i.::',. ,2. ..1, --7::".; '.,:i.-..,,, 7.1,2 ...•ill ..:,u
:::1.12-2 i'..:+...'1•_, :::.1 a:: :::::"'-_-': 3',.?,:.. -.2.7 7 ..., .::_.'7?. ...-.- '....,-.;!.. 9.2--7.7.72000" ' ",''.'i n-r v.iotes
LlIts.,....1 :)o. ir. cie-at.,..t.lha,.:_),...; L., LLI"' ."..:',7,.....LL.i.A.O. L,:, '‘'.."1... 17.11:Ch111...: aad 7.::...,-.o_- rant
V111_oa;2 "2....-.?..;,..r..
5. lha nt;'7'7 '':.1 1 7;11.1,..; ::.-.1..-.v..,.r ar1 otCao,.. ().C:f is:)a...-F ra. tha VI.2.1a.;.-.:
,a.,.,:, ,...... :....:;...:-.c.: 1..-1 ..1'....r,.r.o,1 to or,.'.::,7! ..1.1.1 faro,..,:a to tIo.a o.ataiha,•et C: .t11.'.'.
.1:02,71':', ',....,••,:t iTi,.1L,,,2,, •••Y.'': ....:;.,7...1 L..L.L.?....n of
111.11.1:I. naoietii.4 to :.:"..2 '3.=31;, .,....: t........'..1 .-.'::'.._r7 ....l'..7..!". `.'.-i.:2,-.7. ,i..•,,, ,I -:.!..-J,,.......-.:; no
rtri c.oc,. rd^:aattoLl 'on •:.-,..,.! tCan. ac'is tc.1..t..7..7.. ,..7) Ciao .!,22,ac..11.'tay roo,.! ...,..-.';'.-..at.....,o-ilit.• 1
of =II?. :ls2...; •,...i 00•..:.1 1:.09 .:: ,0:-:- f 7:.)7:: ..:-:L ....`0,.:; c.,1(.1 ion-root ir.
000t.:067 and. Canardt 0 7 i'...:. C)7170.17;.,;1 k.nC7•7:1 t..” t'l,',...:[1.; ;1:1C1 :11.I. F: !"_''. C017:::,:i.'..:•I
CO2i-,2:1, cortificat.c.: atai .2.:Cff.....:-.[..t...), incl...d!....19 :7-..•.'.1'IL:'::2t•_../fOr". fY.!.-7,1.ifi'Le.•11, 3:1:111
corta tittte representations c:..' :.I.it.': '.'.11a.•.-_._72 ;:a to L.::'.: t,:utli es: ;ill..
con=ai..r2d therein.
...
.... . .
-4-
,...
• - . -••,..-'.•••.Ot e. .;.,...:-......,... ..
- '.•'1".... .-.......r... ... .
•
• 6. The r.anITT( in beh,...lf
of the ct,;•,,1 1;le C,a-, it rp,t1 tc c:110. Se'cvic:
a 0: CI:, I in:! 11 71 t .1V0107-
e.•nt: r..)1,;.T1 pr :1,11 ;.,-.,,011; , ,nit eU' 0rn
.1,00 , •T T;I 1,7 no. " of :19.7.!,,
`3.
ATT` I'En of tb.c! of P'!" this
(1,1y of: , 1973.
Pau] R. Ra•Ipal:11.
Attest:
John Frane, cicrh
DATE: June 7, 1973
TO: M nyor & Members of Village Council
FROM: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich p
SUBJECT: METRO RATE AUTHORITY - NSP FRAI'C FUSE ORDINANC E
Attached is a copy showing the action taken at the May 8 , 1973, Council
meeting
NSP has forwarded information on the communities which have approved the
Joint Cooperative Agreement establishing the Metro Rate Authority,which are
as follows:
Farmington Bloomington
Lakeville Edina
Lake St. Croix Coon Rapids
Maplewood Fridley
Golden Valley Maple Grove
Chanhassen Osseo
Deephave n Plymouth
Excelsior St. Anthony
Mound Cottage Grove
Spring Lake Park Lauderdale
As of the writing of this memo, no specific questions were raised by members
of the Council;therefore, I made no inquiry to Mr.Hess or Mr. LeFevere,
RPFI:kg
1:
I
ti
May El, 1973 Council Meeting I
A. Renewal with modifications of franchise ordinance granting Northern
States Power Company the right to o aerate in the Vial eae of Eden Prairie.
Mr. Heinrich, speaking about the ordinance, stated the t both Bloomington
and Edina have passed such an ordinance, Discussion followed regarding the
ordinance and the Metro Rate Authority (item F). Mr. Heinrich informed the
Council of Mr. Keefe's and Mrs. Crowe's commitment to a state regulatory
agency.
Mr. McCulloch e;cpre ssed concern over smaller communi ties lacking a voice
since members of the authority would receive only one vote per 100 users.
Mrs_ Meyers questioned the reasoning of the franchise ordir..ance.
With the understanding that the Council could submit the ir questions on the
ordinance and joint cooperative agreaTent to Mr. Heinrich for reply at the
June 32, 3973, meeting, Mr. Fennel moved to adopt the first reading of
Ordinance No. 223, Northern States Po,..ver Company franchise ordinance. Mr.
McCulloch seconded_ Motion carried unanimously.Y
F. Consider'tion of Joint Cooperative_A=reementestiblishing a Metro Rate
Authority to jointly and cooperatively administer the rate provisions of
uniform franchises granted to the Northern States Po-.aer Company.
This item was discussed with !.tem VA and will be carried over until the June 12
meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 722
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING
FOR HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, a report has been given by the Village Engineer to the
Village Council on June 12, 1973, reconmrending the following improvement to wit:
Projects SAN 73-1-04 and WTR 73-2-04 involving sani tary sewer and
watermain lateral service to the Kings Court Additions
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE
OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in
accordance with the report and the assessment of property
abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of
the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Sect, 429.011
to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvement
as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement
on the 10th day of July, 1973, at the Village Administrative
Offices at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The Village Council shall give
published notice of such hearing and improvement as required
by law.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on June 12, 1973.
Paul P, Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
44�
RESOLUTION NO. 723
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING
FOR HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, a report has been given by the Village Engineer to the Village
Council on June 12, 1973, recommending the following improvement to wit:
Projects SAN 73-1-12, WTR 73-2-12 and STR 73-3-12 involving
sanitary sewer and watermain lateral service and street sur-
facing along Hiawatha Ave. from Scenic Heights Road to south
of Hillside Drive.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE
OF EDEN PRAI RIE:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in
accordance with the report and the assessment of property
abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of
the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Sect. 429.011
to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvement
as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement
on the 10th day of July, 1973, at the Village Administrative
Offices in the Village of Eden Prairie at 8:30 o'clock P.M.
The Village Council shall give published notice of such hearing
and improvement as required by law,
ADOPTED by the Village Council on June 12, 1973.
1
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D, Frane, Clerk
FEASIBILITY REPORT ON PROPOSED
PUBLIC ICRI(S IMPRWEEN[S TO
HIAWATHA AVENUE
VILIAOE OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
ll1PRWBNE?VfS PROPOE:
SANITARY SEVB LATERAL CCIVSTRUCTION, SAN 73-1-12
WATER LATERAL CWSWJJCTION, WIR 73-2-12
STREET IMPROVEMENTS, SIR T3-3-12
APPROVED AND FORWARDED FOR COUNC L ONSIVERATION:
Web b3 ea .44141
Date Cana J. e, P.E.
RegUttation No. 9323
Village Eitgfneat
•
•
INDEX
COVER
INDEX
CERTIFICATE
FEASIBILITY REPORT
PLATES - PROJECT DETAILS
PROJECT COST SUMMARIES
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL (TABLE I)
NOTICE OF HEARING
1 hereby centi.6y.that thie nepont uaa ptepaned
by me on under my cU ct dupenvi&on and .that 1
am a duty Reg.ie.tened ➢noieedtionat Eng.ineen. under
.the taw* o6 .the State o6 IAlnneao-ta,
/ ,
George A, Fannewonth, P.E.
r: Reg.ie.tkation No. 9737
June 6, 1973
�. .
•
FEASIBILITY REPORT ON PROPOSED PUBLIC
WORKS IMPROVEMENTS ON HIAWATHA AVENUE WITHIN THE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
I. INTRODUCTION
This report examines the feasibility of constructing several pro-
posed public works improvements within the right-of-way of Hiawatha
Avenue in the Village of Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Prior to initiati on
of this feasibility study the Vi llage Council caused a letter to be
sent to Hiawatha Avenue residents outlining rough costs of sewer,
water and street improvements and in which residents were asked to
indicate their interest in obtaining improvements during summer 1973.
Informal response to the letter was generally in favor of undertaking
the proposed sewer, water and street improvements at this time.
II. AUTHORITY FOR STUDY
Brauer & Associates, Inc. was retained by the Village of Eden Prairie
to undertake a feasibility study of the proposed improvements to Hiawatha
Avenue. Authorization to proceed was issued in a memo addendum of
May 22, 1973 to a letter contract dated September 27, 1973 for pro-
fessional services in developing Red Rock area publ is works projects
during 1973.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The location of the proposed projects is shown on Plate 1 attached
to this report.
PROJECT SAN 73-1-12
Project SAN 73-1-12 consists of construction of an 8" diameter
lateral sewer line and services serving both sides of Hiawatha Avenue
and Scenic Heights Road, extendi ng south through the Hiawatha Avenue
right-of-way and ending approximately 1300' south of the Hiawatha-
Scenic Heights Road intersection.
This proposed lateral sewer will flow to an existing lateral sewer
line located in Heather Avenue some 100' east of Hiawatha Avenue.
Plate 2 shows the preliminary layout of this proposed line.
The estimated total assessable project cost for the sanitary sewer
is $32,826 as shown on the Summary of Project Cost, page 9. It is
proposed that the project cost be assessed to those benefited by equal
1
t
share for each Residential Equivalent Connection (R.E.C.) served. The
total number of Residential Equivalent Connections served is 23, see
Table I - Note that parcel 3615 has potential for division into an
additional buildable lot and has, therefore, been judged to represent
two (2) R.E.C. units.
The rate of assessment for each R.E.C.'s equal share in the con-
struction of the sanitary sewer lateral is computed as follows:
$32,826, _ $1,427/R.E.C.
23
The above rate is noted as Rate "A' in Table I.
PROJECT WTR 73-2-12
Project WTR 73-2-12 consists of construction of an 8" diameter
watermai n with related appurtenances and services within the Hiawatha
Avenue right-of-way beginning at the 16" trunk watermain in Scenic
Heights Road and extending south approximately 1300 1.f. Connections
will be made to existing water laterals in Hiawatha Circle arrd Heather •
Avenue to provide proper looping in this area. Project layout is shown
in Plate 2.
The estimated total assessable cost for this proposed water lateral
is $23,718 as shown on the Summary of Project Cost, page 10. It is
again proposed to assess each R.E.C. (see Table I) an equal share of
the project. The rate of assessment for each R.E.C.'s equal share of
constructing the proposed lateral watermain is computed as follows:
$23,718 = $1,031/R.E.C.
23
The above rate is noted as Rate "B" in Table I.
PROJECT STR 73-3-12
Project STR 73-3-12 involves construction of improvements to the
existing Hiawatha Avenue roadway surface including minimum grading and
widening to 28' width, construction of bituminous "deep strength" base
and surface, installation of either curb and gutter or bituminous shoe
curb and construction of minimum storm sewer. Layout is shown in
Plate 2. Proposed street structural secti ons are shown in Plate 3.
• The proposed street width and structural section were selected
after considering estimated traffic in the area, soil conditions,
anticipated maintenance problems and after review of Eden Prai rie
standards for residential street construction. The minimal storm
sewer proposed is needed to drain a low area which will become land-
locked as the surrounding area develops.
2
•
Construction of the proposed street improvements will require
acquis ition of additional right-of-way. Present right-of-way on
Hiawatha Avenue is 60' wide except for the area adjacent to Parcel
3615 where the right-of-way is 33'. An additional 27' wide strip
approximately 265' long will be required from Parcel 3615 for a con-
sistent 60; right-of-way along Hiawatha Avenue. The minimum additional
right—of-way required from Parcel 3615 for constructiononof the pro-
posed street is a strip 17' in width.
ALTERNATE "A" PROJECT STR 73-3-12
The cost of this project has been developed in two Alternates.
Alternate "A" street improvements includes concrete curb and gutter
plus other items noted above. The total estimated assessable cost of
this Alternate is $41,656 as shown on the Summary of Project Cost,
page 11. It is proposed that this cost be assessed to the R.E.C.'s
adjacent to the improved street (23) on an equal share basis. The
rate of assessment for each R.E.C.'s equal may be computed as follows:
$41,656 = $l,811/R.E.C.
23
The above rate is noted as Rate "D" in Table I.
ALTERNATE "B" PROJECT STR 73-3-12
Alternate "B" street improvements includes bituminous "shoe" curb
plus other items noted above. The total assessable project cost for
Alternate "B" is estimated as $35,040 as shown on the Sunmary of Project
Cost, page 12. If this Alternate is selected, it is proposed that an
equal share of the project be assessed to each R.E.C. adjacent to the
improvement. The rate of assessment of an equal share of Alternate "B"
project cost is as follows:
$35 040 = $1,523/R.E.C.
The above rate is noted as Rate "E" in Table I.
IV. OTHER ASSESSMENTS AND COSTS
In addition to the costs of the proposed improvements, the following
costs will be borne by landowners:
a. Trunk Sewer and Water Costs:
If water and sewer projects are authorized and constructed,
each R.E.C. unit wi 11 also be assessed$520 for water and sewer
trunk service. This rate has been established by previous action
of the Village Council. This item is Rate "C" in Table I.
3
•
I
b. Metro Sewer Board (MSB) Sewer Availability Charge
By MSB action a sewer availability charge has been levied and
becomes due when connection to the sewer lateral is made For hookups
to new homes made in 1973 the charge wi 11 be $275. For hookup to
homes built prior to January 1, 1973, the charge is $138. These
costs will be greater for hookups made in 1974.
c. Other Costs
Other costs borne by residents when hooking up to sewer
and water laterals are as fol lows:
Charges by Village of Eden Prairie
1) Water meter charge at $50 per meter.
2) Building permit fees for hookup construction at $20 est.
3) Water connection charge at$100.
Construction Cost •
1) Construction of sewer and water hookup at $525 - 650
estimated average.
Total estimated average Other Costs at $530.
d. Total Cost to Property Owner
Total estimated costs to the affected property owner are
determined by adding the appropriate project total from Table I
(Alternate "A" or "B" as selected) plus sewer availabilit
charge and other average costs. A total minimum charge to
a typical Hiawatha landowner may be $5,623.
VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
COST SUM1ARY
(See Table I)
FUNDING
Funds will be available from Village internal funds for temporary
project financing. Permanent financing will be obtained through 1974
bond issue. All project costs will be assessed benefited properties in
accordance with Minnesota State Law.
FEASIB ILITY
The proposed projects are feasible and will result in benefit to
adjacent properties.
4
VII. PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
Phase Estimated Date
Counci 1 Receive Feasibility Report June 12, 1973
Hold Public Hearing July 10, 1973
Approve Plans and Specifications, July 10, 1973
Authorize Project
Open Bids August 9. 1973
Construction Substantial ly Complete October 15, 1973
Special Assessment Hearing September, 1973
Assessments Payable January 1, 1974
5
/
/
-_./, W.tlT 7!5'1. Th-
I
/ /
;
% K
�. ' t
�L�s' l bir Nwds
0 04 et!1 1 r MG tOw�GNT >
-----,-.0-- v f �I
.,
,1 .. .,
:"-,.. , . ir ` ar� ,
t '�
p4LA t 1
p i
a
W,
'' K@fl1cvGK LDKE z
\, e
I \ /
\ l7 �T6iy[lyb
l�was
v /'
/ ' ,,,o,,n . �..
LCc/L;IC)N MAP S
PLATE
P `
6 v. 4 ?'
4,:, M, ells ~ar.m, 4`.
I
—
•in inotir-11- --
awbr b 4201,1111).
3. II
• 1i a t
.-
Il
0 i
i
I I t
1 1 LI 1
It .2mmas 1 ..X
A 00(21 ,q,
cr,"911,111 liNINi' °1IN 1'1 1
1------
...•
1-4 L
4f1 4" 1 L.--- _______
i 0 :
A
il
:-..•.r,
1 "
‘....) I ...307..''. .. :......--.6 ...'
—
• 1 d -- -;.;;.: or;:s-now—— •
I g
—•
lit 0
i•''. 51 .... ,
.
1
0 I I 11 1
N
" • 1111
. .
......,
'1 • .".:
1
6,1,
7 41.._____,•.;,
0 4 .
•
,
•a.j Z 1
, • U ,
,
P .
E .'
... )
i 0
J...„,
21
4 ..
• li,
. •
i
i
•
ia i o 1 ... ; I
? , ....
...0
i MO Idbilirdid II- I
1 : ,
- e
;I I
,.....- ,
1 .
li
ii,
i 00 I -1- I It II
I. I
--1--
I
I
i rwir I
—
r..
...
•
•
' I
i . 14
v
m Z' ..
o
o I 4 . 111)
�J
! �, M
g ; J
4-
a , ! U
I
1
A Z $1 , • - j
,. Ili1 " Ili a.
1 ., 1 In J
`r ! • Q 1
i d.' , 4I
a ;4
j L
• I 1 P
R I ..
f I I i i
•
.5
SOP►-^- 8
HIAWATHA AVENUE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST
PROJECT NO: SAN 73-112
DESCRIPTION: Sanitary Sewer in Hiawatha, 1300' South from
Scenic Heights Road
COST ITEMS: AMOUNT
Construction & Contingencies $25,950.00
Engineering 16% 4,671.00
Legal & Administration 11/4% 389.00
Funded Interest & Bond Service 7% 1 ,816.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $32,826.00
CONTRIBUTING FUNDS None
NET TOTAL ASSESSABLE PROJECT $32,826.00
COST (ESTIMATED)
TEMPORARY FUNDING SOURCE: City Internal Funds
PERMANENT FUNDING SOURCE: 1974 Bond Issue
I have aevLewed the above data and kind
the ptopo.sed method o6 6 • .to be
6eua.cbte.
. taut
ce D.iaec.ton
9
HIAWATHA AVENUE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST
PROJECT NO: WTR 73-212
DESCRIPTIDN: Watermain in Hiawatha Avenue, 1250 ' South from
Scenic Heights Road
COST ITEMS: AMOUNT
Construction & Contingencies ;18,750.00
Engineering 18% 3,375.00
Legal & Administration 11/2% 281.00
Funded Interest & Bond Service 7% 1,313.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $23,718.00
CONTRIBUT ING FUNDS None
NET TOTAL ASSESSABLE PROJECT S23,718.00
COST (ESTIMATED)
TEMPORARY FUNDING SOURCE: City Internal Funds
PERMANENT FUNDING SOURCE: 1974 Bond Issue
I have n.evLewed .the above data and bind
the ptopoeed method o6 La ' to be
6ea4 bfe. /�
d
. vane
.finance VAvec taa
10
HIAWATHA AVENUE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE. M INNESOTA
SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST
PROJECT NO: STR 73-312 (ALTERNATE "A")
DESCRIPTION: Street Improvement wi th Concrete Curb, 1300'
South of Intersection of Scenic Heights Road
and Storm Sewer
COST ITEMS: AMOUNT
Construction & Conti ngenci es $32,450.00
Engineering 18% 5,846.00
Legal & Administrati on 11% 490.00
Funded Interest &Bond Service 7% 2,270.00
Right—of-Way 600.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $41 ,656.00
CONTRIBUTING FUNDS None
NET TOTAL ASSESSABLE PROJECT $41,656.00
COST (ESTIMATED)
TEMPORARY FUNDING SOURCE: City Internal Funds
PERMANENT FUNDING SOURCE: 1974 Bond Issue
I have hevA.eaed .the above data and 6.cnd
.the ptoposed method o6 Sanding,to be
6eaethk.
. /Lane
e VJn.ec toa
11
HIAWATHA AVENUE
VILLAGE OF EOEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST
PROJECT NO: STR 73-312 (ALTERNATE "B")
DESCRIPTION: Street Improvement with Bituminous Shoe Curb ,
1300' South of Intersection of Scenic Heights
Road and Storm Sewer
COST ITEMS: AMOUNT
Construction b Contingencies $27,200.00
Engineering 18% 4,900.00
Legal & Admin istration 11/2% 420.00
Funded Interest & Bond Service 7% 1 ,920.00
Right-of-Way 600.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $35,040.00
CONTRIBUTING FUNDS None
NET TOTAL ASSESSABLE PROJECT $35,040.00
TEMPORARY FUNDING SOURCE: City Internal Funds
PERMANENT FUNDING SOURCE: 1974 Bond Issue
I have neviewed.the above data and Sind
.the proposed method o6 sanding to be
6eae-ibte.
. e
e U.viceetoh.
12
•
..i.711m2 000o00000 0o0o0 88. a°oa°o8a°o 00 00 0
A ocA 'tn o
F 4.. /.!.7.t 4.!.7 Q 4•!J 4 e l en en e l e.1 en .t ••7.T O.
•
.4
•
•� •` 0000000 0eh0 eh Oo0 NN. NN 00 O0. OO CO 2
Eup • • u 0.NeT cr.NNN eT NN O.eT O. N. nN NN N I.eT U4
W O •� ^.. N.nn 1.N. nn I\nn N N,NN•NN n 0.vs. N •
0t M
.n en an en .n.n.n u1
rJ WO M to en.1.1.n M eh en.n en en en en .n e+1.n .n 0,0^11 10 0
0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .0
0 • 41
eJ g.uyy •ut.n.n in in an0inen u. u1 en./1 O
gN eil•-1.-I.1.i.-1.-I ed'/.-1.-1.-1 .-4 4-4 .-1.1 .4.4 .1 .-I.-1 01 Ypy
. 4J t,
L yy
.I HI.-I 4.•1.•1.-1 .I.•1..-1.-1 HI.-1 .-1.i .-1.-1 .I .-1.4 N 9
0 H I.I.I.•1.-I W.4.-1.-I.-1 .-I 6-1 6-1.4 .-1.-1 .-1 .-I, .1 N O
(' HI.-
0 0 • 0 CO COeC CO CO CO 00 CO CO CD CO CO CO 00 CO CD CO CO CO CO .4, .-1
i� u) • • w •• w • •w 0
A g f. a'1.-1.i d.i.I .I.I.i.i.i ••1.I .i.1.I•/ .1 .-1.-4 M P
U M 0000000 00000 0 00 O M
-
e•i y L At1+ Cl NN N NNNN NNNNN N NN .0 0
q g0g u .n.n v n 5.n.n. .n .n.n.n.n.n �1 4e it It ie K .n .n IN O *
{iN3 . 4-4 •O
.1.4.-4.4.1.-1.-1 .4.I.-1.-1.•1 .-I.-I .-1.4 6-1.-1 ..4 .-1.-1 N
M .1.'1 en M.+1M In .101MM OWM 0, r1.n M.1 .n Mt+l .O .1
.4): 000000000000 000000 0 00 o a
04 .'3 e�C•ei.-1./.i.•1 e� .i.i.-1.-I.-I .-I .-I .-1.I e�.i .-1 .-I.M Na
M
0
nnn I.n1.1. NN I.I.I. N.N. nn I.n n N.N. d
.-� M NNN NNNN NNNNN NNNN NN N N.• .n .)
;+a ?v.s.er 4 4 a .e s.r.0.a .7.0 .0 s.s 4 .r ,. •� ao .Ci1
.tl. y y.I 4-1.-1.I.-1.-I .-1.I.-1.-I.-1 e�.-I .i.I r-1./ .1 .-I.-1 N u
3.1
F- } O4 g
r o p p p 41 m� •
iii1 q'LO..� .1 ill l�t,) UU a8. CA1 N� Ma
.0 M,O.0 0 C0 O 0 p m }e . FI u u ae u u i+ O 00-ig .-1
4.. O tq OO i.le 1C PT9 OHO l+H.-I+i C 0 qq 0 q ++Mall .M-1�.1 Y O
SAe°� a .ia �a;ti44. 3v �°18c`3�4 . 4 • 1 41
N 04 0 eO � 0 C! m M 41 q ib,. of CI A 0• CO p�E+ y
N.
.�-1 3 y y os•7 t4 Q i g AMO V R7 V ig -) '7►'S a
v 0
N •
C1 •
j3 .I-.1.-1.-1.1.-1.-4 .-1.I .-4.-I. 1 .-4.-1 .• 1- 1-4 N qi.I. .4 .4 .-1. i
07 A
.-I
3 0 OI .4 N e+1.t.n.O N. CO O.0.1 N N.� .-1 N M.! I N.-1 I ti 4
12 .1 7
1p1I..
O •
01 HI./.i .-1.a.�.1 .-I.I.-I J.7 to M .-1.a.i.1 I .-1.-1 1 i A
oa .i I.sUI
F F yypq Ol i
Y in a
0 HI Ya to
u4.10 l000 ei..01 .�Os
01 00 . A • .n
HI ,��• g m S �V .41
0.
•o�f++ ' u u
$ 13 IVA m•a Me a « �
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF HEARING ON
PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECTS SAN 73-112, VTR 73-212, STR 73-312
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the Village Council of the Village
of Eden Prairie, Minnesota will meet at the Council Chambers, 8950
Eden Prairie Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota at 7:30 O'Clock P.M.
D.S.T., Tuesday, July 10, 1973, to consider the making of the following
described improvements:
PROJECT SAN 73-112, Construction of sanitary sewer lateral and
appurtenances to serve both sides of Hiawatha Avenue from Scenic
Heights Road to approximately 1300 1.f. south along Hiawatha Avenue.
Total estimated cost equal to $32,826.
PROJECT WTR 73-212, Construction of watennain lateral and appurten-
ances to serve both sides of Hiawatha Avenue from the intersection of
Scenic Heights Road to approximately 1300 l.f. south along Hiawatha
Avenue. Total estimated cost equal to $23,718.
PROJECT STR 73-312, Construction grading, bituminous base and surfacing,
drainage structures and appurtenances on Hiawatha Avenue from Scenic
Heights Road to approximately 1300 1.f. south. Total estimated
cost equal to $41,656.
Pursuant to MESA Section 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be
assessed for such improvements is all that property within or abutting
on above described limits for each project. Wri tten or oral comments
relating to said improvements will be received at this meeting.
Village Clerk
Village of Eden, Prairie, Minnesota
•
14
iI�I
B LACK & V EA T C FI AM A Cue:: sc<;
CONSULT Tel- 361-7000)
--_ - — _ 1500 MEADOW LAIC I, PARKWAY
KANSAS CITY.MISSOU FYI 64114
Eden Prat r':a, 1•finne U&V Project 5171
sata f
Water i'ork;. i:iprovenents IVFile I
June 4, 1973
Mr. Carl J. Jullie
Village Engineer
Village Ilall.
8950 Eden. Prairie road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Carl:
In response to your request for additional descriptions of the proposed
and alternative system for heating and air conditioning for the public
safety office, we will attempt to describe the systems herein.
The proposed air conditioning system consists of a refrigeration con—
densing unit, air handling unit, dampers, damper motors, controls, and
ductwork.
The air handling unit will have hot water heating coil, direct expansion
cooling coil, and filters. The unit is installed in the chemical storage
area. The return ductwork to the unit is provided with a motor operatedt
motor operated damper in th
danger in the space return air duct and a p
outside air intake duct. The two motor operated dampers are operated by
a single damper no tar with linkage provided to cause the dampers to be
opposite acting. (One damper opens es the second damper closes and vice
versa.) The dampers motor is controlled by a remote bulb thermostat having
the sensin3 element located in the sized air stream. This is provids-d to
permit mac of outride air to be used for cool.in;when the outside air
Fermi to, which results in a waviest; in the operating coat. A second
remote bulb thermcotet is provided, a'i i scnsin;; ele:^ent in the outside
air stream, to override. the damper eater control and drive the epame
return air damper to the full open pno1 rion and the outside air d asap ter to
a predetermined minirurs setting, when the outside air temperature rises to
a point that would net permit effective cooling with fresh air. The damper
motor will have an end switch that will prevent operation of the condensing
unit until the danprrs are positioned with space return full open and out—
side air intake at minimum position. Primary space temperature control
will be by a room heating thermostat controlling the flow of hot water
through a modulating valve and the air handling unit heating coil, and a
room cooling thermostat to the control operation of a refrigerant liquid
line solenoid valve and a control relay in the condensing unit.
`f
H L ACK :a ' Fa 1 C it
' I
Mr. Carl J. Jullic - 2 - June 4, 1973
Air iron the a r handling un it is distributed by ductwork above the
ceiling and through diffuserm in the ceiling, thus providing uniform
conditioning of the air. A relief danger is provided in the room wall
to relieve air irto the storage room when outside air is being used for
cooling.
The condensing unit is to be located on the filter area roof outside the
chemical storage room.
The alternative methods of air conditioning the space would be with a
single package air handling unit, located in the space, with a refriger-
ation condensing unit as described above or with a cinble package unit,
located in the space, and including the condensing unit as port of the
package. These units would have no ductwork and would depend on discharge
velocity to distribute the air, thus creating possible hot and cold areas
within the offices. Exhaust fans and short partition walls would be
required with the alternative in order to distribute the air. Both of
these methods would use floor space within the conditioned area thereby
reducing office floor space (3' x 5' area required). Heating could be
provided by water coils in the units.
The first alternate method could be adapted to use outside air for cooling
when availei,le; ho,rever, the cost would be decree sad and the net savings
between this alternative and the proposed system would be less. Space
required would he very similar to that required by the unit as shown on
1-31-73 droving. Dampers, damper trotor, controls , intake duct, and roof
intake hood would be the sa!r.a as described for the proposed system.
The second alternate method would be a complete packaged unit including all
controls and therefore would not readily lend itself to use of outside air
for cooling. A Minimum of outside air for ventilation can be provided for
11s1.11 r,aof intake hood and duct similar to that provided under the
original propo e. :.ysten. The installation would require two louvered
opeei,i;s in so est,_riot wall to provide inlet and outlet air for the con-
densing twit. As 17,2nticrcad in the first albrnat'ive., the modification of
this systole would result In additional cost.
in su:a.r c':v, the syncam proposed in the charge order is the host designed
and cost desirable system. It will provide snail ar space conditioning as
toured in rho remaining portions of the plant building. It is somewhat
more expensive but may pay for itself in the long run by being a more
efficient sw•stem. Therefore, It is our recommendation to construct the
heating and air conditioning system as proposed La the change order.
1
BLACK aV :n1 CFI
Mr. Carl J. Jullie - 3 — June 4, 1973
7f you hrwe any additional yuesttor;s concerning the above information,
please contact us.
Very truly yours,
BLACK & \7C ICH
i James L. Patton
JLP:sw
cc: Mr. Fred Whiting
f
sot;lll 1;1.\Ki.1,1N tn'\1 0 st I \'I(PS I'! \� l\G IlO\RI)
l • 6401 Fran::e Avenue south • Ecter.Minnesota 55435
Phone 920-1194
Marilyn Weatherman Serving:
Planning Health Consultant Bloomin,top
Eden Prairie
Edina
Richfield
June 6, 1973
To: Members of the South Hennepin Human
Services Planning Board
From: Camillo DeSantis, Chairman
Subject: Hennepin County Funding
As of the writing of the attached letter, the County
Commissioners still have not made firm decisions
relative to 1973 Program b-:;iget.:. (ems you know we
are currently onperating on a month to month basis)
The attached letter seeks the sunocir L of our two
County Cot rlissioners for our full 19'73 budget.
Now i.s the time to contact To Ticen and Tom Olson
and impress upon then the importance of funding and
continuing our program. Our "feelers" indicate that
we have the support of Torn Olson. Tom Ticen has voted
against a similar budget proposal as ours which serves
a di ffcr.ent part of the County. Thi a does not neces-
sari iv mean that wet do nut have Tom Ticen'a support
but we will have to seek some rsuranct that he is sup—
porting our program.
I would suggest that you feel free to share the enclosed
letter with follow councilmen, City Idanagers, and other
city personnel and friends and ask them to contact the
County Commissioners and support of our program.
Let us hope that our of forts pay off .
•
Enclosure
SOI HI Ii!\\I !'I\ I1l'111\ SI WI(1-S 1'I.,1\\I\G 19H110)
54 01 France Avenue South • Edina,Minnesota 55435
Phone 920-1194 ,
Serving:B Ic.ommgto n 1
arilyn Weatherman
„nning Health Consultant Eden Prairie,
Ediea
Richfield
June 6, 1073
•
Mr. Thomas Ticen
County Cc niscloner
130 Court rouse
Minneapolis, i-linnesota 55415
Dear Mr. Ticen:
We understand that you are in the process of making your ii
final decisions on funding of County Programs and Services
for the balance of the year.
As you know, the South Hennepin Human Services Planning
Lard was for_:;ud in ,7anucry, 3.972, out of a concern and
effort of the cities of hinrninr,t-nn. trirn Prairie: Friin:,
and Richfield to study and net the needs of its residents.
This endeavor was undertaken with the help of the Mental
Health-Mental Retardation Area Office as part of it imple-
mentation of area and neighborhood boards which would plan,
coordinate and if needed deliver services in selected geo-
graphic areas .
i
The South Hennepin Human Services Planning Beard was formed
under the Joint Powers Art: and has the snnpnrt :nd partic-
ipation of all. four municipalities.
•
We have comptcted planning in our area and now we are ready '
to further coordinate programs and to explore, programs which
we will operate if other agencies and orvani zat:ions are not
able to meet the need. We arc submitting) to the County for
1974 two budges: requests. One for our operating budget for
our central staff and 'Board activity which will primarily
engage in coordination and implementing our plan which was
developed out of considerable surveys, person-to-person
contacts, meetings with students, teachers, city officials
I
Mr. ?'l;o Ticen
- 2 - June 6, 1973
and'pri\rat:- doctors and dent i arts. The other budnet is for
operating funds nri.mari IT for counseling services for in-
dividuals and f<..„il.ie.- This servi cc cnme up as our number
e
one psi e,rity base on core.:^i t_' responses and information.
We feel we hove a solid b::.._ eocn which to proceed. Now
tl us. to continue to attempt
we need your sir?�ort to cnr..
to meet the needs ofappro;:i:r.a tely 200.000 people, many
of whore have mental, physical, social and emotional need.
We have welcomed the opportunity to engage in planning
activities to date and now are extremely anr:ious to
deliver services and rner. scoot of the needs of our resi-
dents. We hope that you will support us for the balance
of this year and provide_ us with the support to continue
and fulfill these tasks and obligations.
Sincere ly,
Camillo G. DeSantis
CiiaitieS n
South iienncpin dunce Se rvi ces Planning Board
cc: South IIennepin iiunan Services Planning Board Memhers
Stanley R. Cowie
Dale Simonson
CGD/1d
•
DATE: June 5, 1973
TO: Mayor& Members of Village Council
FROM: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich�1
SUBJECT: SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT
On May 17th, the State Legislature passed a bill appropriating funds for a
Summer Youth Employment program. This bill will be administered by the
Minnesota Department of Manpower Services. It provides for the employment
of youth up to age 22 al $1 .60 per hour foi 30 hours per week for 10 weeks.
The Minnesota Department of Manpower Services will enter into a contract with the
- county and municipalities within the county with a population of 2,500 or more
who, under the act allocation formula,would be entitled to funds for one or more
slots .
The amount of funds a community receives is dependent upon the proportion of its
population to the total county population.
The total allocation for Hennepin County is $251,002. Within this total allocation ,
the amount which is allocated to municipalities is $244,312. The amount which
the Village of Eden Prairie may contract with the Minnesota Department of Manpower
Services is $1,814. Eden Prairie must provide 1219 matching funds. They cannot
be in—kind contributions. In addition, Eden Prairie must absorb any administrative
costs. The funds from this program may be used only to pay wages and FICA
contributions of youth so employed.
We have indicated to the M innesota Department of Manpower Services that we
are willing to participate in this program. As soon as the contract documents
are received and completed , I will present them to the Council for official action.
Eden Prairie's cost for this program would be $259. We would hire at the prescribed
rate of$1.60 per hour. The work week will be 30 hours, and the duration of the
program is approximately 10 weeks. We are planning a program that would include
funding for four people for 1 0 weeks.
Areas of work for the four young people probably includes two, maybe three,
positions in park/street maintenance work; possibly one position in public
safety;and one clerical position.
RPH:kg
A
•
r
DATE: June 5 , 1973
TO: Mayor & Members of Village Council�1`
FROM: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich '
SUBJECT: INCRF'ASED INSPECTIONAL. REQUIREMENTS OF
VISAGE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
The continuing responsibility of government of a growing municipality is to
provide adequate levels of service. Perhaps no municipal service is more
vigil than inspectional services of new building construction.
The Planning Commission and Village Council processed many new develop-
mental proposals the past year and that high level of planning activity is now
having the expected causal effect on the Inspections Department.
• Last fall during budget review time and again in December at staff salary
review time, I stated that the Village will have to consider additional help
in Building Ins pectional services when the developers submit building permit
applications as expected.
Building permit revenue estimated in the 1973 Annual Budget was $27,630.
An amount of$7,476 in fees has been collected during the first five months
of this year. The Building Inspector and Finance Director have projected
permit fees for the entire year in the amount of $40,266. I have reviewed the
projects and agree with their estimates.
The estimated permit fees for the last seven months are as follows:
Single family units $18,750.00
Commercial and Industrial 10,000.00
Multiple family residential 4,000.00
Total last 7 months $32,750.00
first 5 months 7,476.00
TOTAL for the year $40,266.00
The 1973 Building Inspections Program appropriation is approximately $26,000.
The resulting balance would be more than sufficient to cover compensation and
benefits of an additlona 1 Inspector for the last half of 1973 as well as occasional
part-time clerical help.
"Fire Protection" and "Life Safety"Codes are an important part of plan checking
on multiple family dwellings and commercial buildings. Presently there are
approximately 70 businesses operating in the Village. We need annual
Page 2
inspections of these facilities. A better code enforcement program will
allow building owners and home owners the benefit of better insurance rates.
Insurance companies inspect commercial buildings often and set their rates
accordingly. Insurance companies do not enforce building codes, they only
adjust their rates according to the risk involved.
huildini architccis utid enginaeFs often fr.ii to implement proper firs resistive
design as well as the use of fire resistive material in the construction of
buildings.
Fire safety in buildings can be divided Into three areas:
1. Design
2. Construction
3. Maintenance.
it is in these areas where safety deficiencies can exist. In the past, maintenance
was the main concern for fire protection. It is the opinion of the Building
Inspector and the Fire Chief that we can prevent fires by concentrating on design
and construction.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that in addition to the present Building Inspector and Plumbing
Inspector, a Building Inspector should be hired. The new Inspector in the
Building Department must have a good knowledge of building and fire protection
codes. I have consulted with the Public Safety Director and the Fire Chief and
the Volunteer Fire Marshal and received a strong recommendation that such a
combined Building/Pire Inspector position be established as soon as possible.
It may be possible that a present member of the Eden Prairie Volunteer Fire
Department may qualify for this position. If this is possible, additional benefits
would accrue: in having a fireman available in the community during the day.
The salary necessary to fill this position would be in the $1I,000-$13,000 range.
A minimum of three to five years of building and/or fire inspection experience
would be required.
RPll:kg
r
•
CLER<'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
JUNE 12, 1973
CONTRACTORS 1 & 2 Family)
Robert II. Mason
J. H. Lien Construction Company
John H. Palmer Builder
UTILITY SERVICE INSTALLER
Avol es Plumbing Service, Inc.
H. A. Christenson Excavating Company
Production Plumbing and Heating Company
HEATING C VENTILATING
Minnesota Sheet Metal
PLU'l3I NG
Produc Lion Plumbing and Heating Company
GAS FITTERS
Production Plumbing and Heating Company
SET-UP LICENSE
Olympic Hills Golf Club
CUM LICE"SL
Nan Prairic Leg ion Association
3.2 BEER LICEUSE
Cedar Hills Golf and Ski
These licenses have been approved by the program head responsible for
the licensed activity.
Min D. Franc,'C.1 erk
JUF/ys
VI D
r- •
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss.
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting Clerk of the Village of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the
attached Resolution No. 724 of a meeting of the Village
Council of said Village held on the date therein indi-
cated with the original minutes thereof on file in my
office and that the same is a full, true and correct
transcript - June 12, 1973.
WITNESS my hand officially and the official
seal of the Village this 13th day of June, 73.
SEAL)
J n . rane, er
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
IUTrNEPIr COUNTY, haIsuE3oTA
RESOLUTION IfO. 724
DE IT RESOLVED, by the Village Council of the
v iii:a„e or Ede11 P�aii•ir. i+iiiuieNu La
That the proposed land division located
in Section 29, Township 116, Range 22,
lega11y described as the south 290 feet
of the east 752 feet of the northwest 1/4
of the northwest 1/4
be approved. Said division is found to be in con-
formance with the provisions of Eden Prairie Ordinance
No. 93 (Subdivision Ordinance) and all amendments
thereto.
Adopted by the Village Council on Juno 12, 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST: Ste,
John D. Irene, Clerk
To: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
From: Kenneth W. Chambers, Village Assessor
Date: June 7, 1973
Subject: Land Division for James Sands —
History: James Sands owns a parcel of
land that is 5 Acres
at the end of Cedar Crest Road. Mr. Sands has sold the prop-
erty and is attempting to close the loan. The new purchaser
has a title opinion that indicates the property does not meet
the 300' foot width requirement setforth in the Minnesota
Statutes.
The new purchaser is requesting a resolution authorizing
this division so this may be put on record.
The site measures 290' x 752' = 5 Acres. I have discussed
this with the Planning Department and we recommend granting
the division.
Thank You.
Ken Chambers
•
._.. .
• ,,
..-
..r •
1\..: '
. ,
o
1,
-J .4
2.6'.77 5.•7e5• ;,
1 -4.
I
,----
1 ,
I 0
j*-4,+• II ,
Ni
t 4 (2-- • rs_.. \'
C, sN •• ,....?.
. \ •-:)
1.
( i
Ckt(01 ft/Lk ---1/4
1
1
•'nli ,
i
I
1
1 i 1
C
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
SAN 73-1.04
VTR 73-2-04
JUNE 12, 1973
Sanitary sewer and waterna% serving homes adjacent to Canterbury
Lane. Crown Drive and Castle Lane in Kings Court and Kings Court
Second Addition to the Village of Eden Prairie.
APPROVED:
•
•
Air
V111age sinter
I
INDEX
COVER
INDEX
• CERTIFICATE
FEASIBILITY REPORT
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
SUMMARIES OF PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING
C PROJECT SCHEDULE
C
I
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR
LATERAL SEWER AND WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
•
SAN 73-1-04
WTR 73-2-04
JUNE 12, 1973
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional
Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
v us y, .
t
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
RE: Project SAN 73-1-04
NTR 73-2-04
HONORABLE MAYOR AND VILLAGE COUNCIL
ROBERT HEINRICH, VILLAGE MANAGER
I. GENERAL
This report presents the results of a feasibility study on the above
referenced improvement projects. The report covers the nature and scope
of proposed construction work, estimated total costs, assessment rates,
financing sources and scheduling data.
The proposed improvemen
ts are located In the north central portion of the
s Court and Kings Kin 1n
Village
n Court Second Additions. The proposed
a g 9
peti tion from abutting
t
verve nt projects were initiated by p
impro p j
owners as designated on the project map.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed projects are:
SAN 73-1-04 8 sanitary sewer on Canterbury Lane south of
Holly Road, Crown Drive and Castle Lane
WTR 73-2-04 6" watenrein on Canterbury Lane south of Holly
Road, Crown Drive and Castle Lane
These two projects provide lateral sanitary sewer and lateral water service
to approximately 26 homes in Kings Court and Kings Court Second Additions.
Lateral utilities were provided to homes immediately to the north of this
project area in 1972. This project area was not included at that time be-
cause the network of lateral sewer to which this project would most econ-
omically connect had not been constructed. A new development to the south
of this project area will provide the necessary sanitary sewer connection
on Kingston Drive south of Crown Drive. This new development is scheduled
for construction in 1973. It is proposed that the lateral sanitary sewer
and watermaln projects discussed in this report be constructed In the
Fall of 1973.
I
III. CONCLUS IONS
The estimated total project costs for new construction are as follows:
SAN 73-1-04 S97,825
WTR 73-2-04 S31,5O5
The assessment policy of the Village of Eden Prairie is that lateral
util ity project costs swill be financed entirely by special assessment
levied against benefited properties. It is therefore proposed that the
above project costs for new lateral construction be assessed against
those properties recei ving sanitary sewer and water services as a direct
result of this project. There are 26 properties receiving sanitary sewer
service and 26 properties receiving lateral water service as a direct
result of this project. Based on the estianted project costs for new
construction, the assessments per benefi ted property (REC) are:
SAN 73-1-04 $ 3,760
WTR 73-2-04 $ 1,260
The proposed projects, SAN 73-1-04 and WTR 73-2-04 are feasible and will
result in a benefit to the properties proposed to be assessed.
IV. ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS AND COSTS
Trunk sewer and water assessment:
With the installation of lateral sanitary sewer and watermain, the previously
authorized assessments for trunk utilities of $520 per REC will become due.
Metro Sewer Board sewer availability charge:
The Metro Sewer Board, which owns and operates interceptor collection and
treatment facilities, levies a connection cha a for each residential_
unit that connects to its facilities. connection charge. vied
at tfn~time lateral sewer Mies are Actedl..JThe rate that app es to
this project is $137.50 per residential unit existing prior to January 1, 1973
and S275.0O per residential lot or unit constructed after January 1, 1973.
Charges by Village of Eden Prairie:
1. Watermeter charge of$5D per residential meter.
2. Permit and inspection fees of $15-$20 for house connections.
3. Water connection charge of $100 per residence.
C
1
Connection Costs:
The lateral sewer and water projects will provide individual sewer and water
services at the property line. These services will be located at the most
feasible point for connection to each home. Each home owner will bear the
additional cost of the individual sewer and water connections to the home.
These costs vary with the length of service required and the amount of
pl sating modifications required.
C
PROJECT MAP
SAN 73-01-04
WTR 73-02-04
J1 _-L.le11�..'.-'• r '-4.r,-,Fqw ww..,.• :.s,•`•':.k N•.
6 . f EIGHTS z
— )•, • 10 `6 �: t 2 1 1:' • Cyr . ` '�s
3 , •7 d:.it j-dN" . 1'tiii 4 Z. .. t'1 ...01.-- L•- � • .w!1 _.
—
—.— s_- w i .HEIGHTS'
v. i•Zf{ it _ :h
HOLLY . ,,,,,,i ROAD�f, f• ':
v
., .1. ••♦ -1 Q r�t.i•a c rl
•— 4;r- 6‘
, _ II" 2 Z �. :al
—-
• •.../ --.2 I �A S 711
_t i a ,i F..--_0:•S>r9--- • -i,71 ;
-
'<S _ ._. _.. ;___U[,3.__ • _ifs i� fM•••a 1.
_ r
_ 4` — d ...
• ; 4;- -..fl._�S.!1 -1r t • s/4w P.
J
yr, .1.4 r• , •.&� +. .. ♦ 1
ASTLE;, .. . cs lid •++•41.r U . 1
nr.• in,.•l.....' 1 . 2 I Si- 2'KNhr ••
.s �` ••A ' J • •A
z
r.
r
I•£ I I + _.. .
.• r.� t4: • Ali
I _. --2 -tn• f _A
2
S. ~p fA
g s 1
KINGS 4 COURT 3 z 4 SECOND a ADD,•
d. ny'
▪ ,t i•• - 1•11LormS=NO lrileiL.: .
•.•O` 4 .1 5 1 6 1 6 rI 5 .- 4 •.. .•
rII
1.. t• 1• i` ■ ; •2 r
•A •• ie :•l , •A • •Ai•U . ♦ T:'••A ..
0, .p'I Nt i .
•
l •
—SANITARY SEWER
y — WATERMAIN
' • LATERAL SEWER ASSESSMENT
• LATERAL WATER ASSESSMENT
• TRUNK UTILITY ASSESSMENT
ii
SUMMARY OF
PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING
PROJECT NO.: SAN 72-1-14
DESCRIPTION: Sanitary sever and street restoration on Canterbury Lane,
Crown Drive and Castel Lane
•
I '
COST ITEM AMOUNT
CONSTRUCTION MD CONTINGENCIES $ 80,550
ENGINEERING — 12% 9,665
ADMINISTRATIVE- 1.5% 1,210
SUB TOTAL $ 91,425
CAPITALIZED INTEREST - 7.0 $ 6,400
( TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST 97,825
OTHER COSTS:
NET ASSESSABLE COST $ 97,825
TEMPORARY FUNDING SOURCE: CITY INTERNAL FUNDS
PERMANENT FUNDING SOURCE: 1974 BOND ISSUE
I have reviewed the above data and
find the proposed method o funding to be
feasible.
o n . r e
Finance Director
.
I
SUMMARY OF
PROJECT COSTS AND FINDING
PROJECT NO: MTR 72-2-14 _
DESCRIPTION: Matenaein construction on Canterbury Lane, Crown Drive
and Castle Lane
COST ITEM AMOUNT
CONSTRUCTION AND CONTINGENCIES $ 25,940
ENGINEERING - 12% 3,115
ADMINISTRATIVE - 1.5% 390
SUB TOTAL $ 29,445
CAPITALIZED INTEREST - 7.0 2,060
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 31,505
OTHER COSTS:
NET ASSESSABLE COST $ 31,505
TEMPORARY FUNDING SOURCE: CITY INTERNAL FUNDS
PERMANENT FUNDING SOURCE: 1974 BOND ISSUE
I have reviewed the above data and
find the proposed method of funding
to be feasible.
o n . ra
inance Director
,
fir PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
SAN 73-1-04
WTR 73-2-04
TRUNK TOTAL
- LATERAL LATERAL SEWER ESTIMATED
KINGS COURT ADDITION OWNER SEWER WATERMAIN WATER ASSESSMENT
Block 1. Lot 4 R. T. Ungerman $ 3,760 $ 1.260 $ 520 S 5,510
5 J. A. Repphun 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
6 L. H. Christiansen 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
Block 2, Lot 1 R. L. Redick 3,760 1.260 520 5,510
2 A. B. Chudyk 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
3 D. L. Solie 3,760 1.260 520 5,510
4 J. J. Carlin 3,760 1.260 520 5,510
KINGS COURT 2ND
Block 1. Lot 1 W. M. McRostie 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
2 R. L. Lindeman 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
3 G. A. Johnson 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
( 4 H. J. Elliott 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
1 5 E. G. Dresser 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
6 J. 0. Westlund 3,760 1.260 520 5,510
Block 2, Lot 1 J. H. Campe 3,760 1.260 520 5,510
4 J. 0. Kise 3,760 1.260 520 5,510
Block 3, Lot 2 J. A. Marino 3,760 0 0 3,740
3 M. E. McCartan 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
4 R. D. Friche 3,760 1.260 520 5,510
Block 4, Lot 1 D. R. Anderson 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
2 A. R. Schendel 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
3 J. A. Scanlon 3,760 1.260 520 5,510
4 W. C. Geimer 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
5 D. R. Harris 3,760 1.260 520 5,510
6 L. J. Well 3,760 1.260 520 5,510
KINGS COURT 3RD
Block 1 , Lot 7 W. F. Martin 3,760 1,260 520 5,510
B W. G. Garens 3.760 1.260 520 5,510
( TOTALS $97,760 $31,500 S13,000
,
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC IMPRDVEMENT HEARING
SAN 73-1-04 _
WTR 73-2-04
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The Eden Prairie Village Council will meet at the Village Hall, 8950
Eden Prairie Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday,
July 10, 1973, to consider the following proposed improvements to be
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 429.
Construction of lateral sanitary sewer and watermain on Canterbury
Lane south of Holly Road, Crown Drive and Castle Lane.
Total estimated assessable costs, including partial assessments:
Total Estimated Assessable Cost $128,725
The properties proposed to be assessed for these improvements are those
residences on Canterbury Lane south of Holly Road, Crown Drive and
Castle Lane.
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
Phase Date
Feasibility Report Presented to Council June 12, 1973
Hold Public Hearing July 10, 1973
Approve Plans and Specifications July 10, 1973
• Receive Bids August 9,1973
Award Contract August 14, 1973
Construction Substantially Complete October 15, 1973
Final Assessment Hearing September, 1973
Assessments Payable January 1, 1974
{
y